alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, James W. Klingler, certify that:

 

 1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/Aof North American Scientific, Inc.;

 

 2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

 3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

 4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

 5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
|  Date: March 11, 2005                         |
|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |
| /s/  James W. Klingler                             |   |   |
| James  W. Klingler                                 |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### David L. EPPS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-320.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1973.

*562Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Bennett H. Brummer, and Mel Black, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant below from conviction of possession of a short-barreled shotgun, for which he was sentenced to imprisonment for three years less certain jail time served.1 The question presented in the brief of the appellant is: “Whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal because the state failed to prove that the defendant had possession of the shotgun.” On consideration thereof in the light of the record and briefs we hold, on the evidence presented, that the challenged ruling of the trial court was not error, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

We note, however, the judgment entered by the trial court recited that the defendant David L. Epps *pleaded guilty*to the charge in question, whereas the record shows his conviction was based on a trial before the court after a plea of not guilty. Accordingly, the judgment is hereby amended to delete therefrom the statement that the defendant pleaded guilty, and by substituting therefor the statement that said David L. Epps was tried before the court and found guilty of possession of a short-barreled shotgun. As so amended the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

1

. The offense is a felony punishable by confinement in the state penitentiary not to exceed five years. § 790.221(1) and (2) Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

PEARSON, Judge

(dissenting).

I would reverse because in my view evidence as to possession was entirely lacking. Arant v. State, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 515; Kirtley v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 245 So.2d 282; Langdon v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 321.
#### Roy Jerome HILL v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 39486.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
# C_2013092EN.01000402.xml

| 28.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6812 — SFPI/Dexia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 92/05

On 21 February 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6812. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6812. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
256 La. 892

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles W. TIDWELL v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50901.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1970.

In re: Charles W. Tidwell applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The ruling complained of is correct.
# C_2013122EN.01001501.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/15

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 April 2013

2013/C 122/09

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2999 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4559 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84000 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5579 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2273 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6215 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,744 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 301,57 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6999 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1590 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3397 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3420 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2651 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3256 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0922 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5277 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6099 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 445,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,8612 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0139 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5985 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 635,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9444 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,612 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,7105 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,087 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6005 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,8523 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,6170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2999

JPY

Japanese yen

128,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4559

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84000

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5579

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2273

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6215

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,744

HUF

Hungarian forint

301,57

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6999

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1590

RON

Romanian leu

4,3397

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3420

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2651

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3256

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0922

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5277

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6099

KRW

South Korean won

1 445,38

ZAR

South African rand

11,8612

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0139

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5985

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 635,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9444

PHP

Philippine peso

53,612

RUB

Russian rouble

40,7105

THB

Thai baht

38,087

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6005

MXN

Mexican peso

15,8523

INR

Indian rupee

70,6170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### MASTERS, INC. v. Tina M. CORLEY, et al.

No. 38678.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 222 So.2d 465.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.96**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office							301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)		301-457-1037 (TDD)		e-mail: 2000usa@census.gov		Statistical Information Staff		Population Division		301-457-2422		e-mail: pop@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12:01 A.M. EDT, MAY 17, 2001 (THURSDAY)

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Demographic Profile for New Hampshire

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the *Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000*  for New Hampshire, a one-page table providing Census 2000 data on age and sex distribution, race, Hispanic origin, household relationship and type, housing occupancy and tenure (whether the housing occupant owns or rents).

 The profile includes nearly 100 data items in all, plus percentage distributions.

 In addition to the profile of the state as a whole, similar demographic profiles for counties, places and other geographic components of the state can be accessed on an embargoed basis at <https://www.census.gov/dcmd/www/embargo/embargo_demoprofile.html>. After the release time, go to the Census Bureau's online search-and-retrieval database American FactFinder <http://factfinder2.census.gov> or to its Demographic Profile Page <https://www.census.gov/census2000/demoprofile.html>. You will also be able to download the profiles from the bureau's file transfer protocol site <http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/>.

 For information about how to order paper copies of Census 2000 demographic profiles, contact Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, 301-457-4100; or e-mail:<webmaster@census.gov >. 

 For local context, contact the New Hampshire State Data Center, 603-271-2155; e-mail: <t_duffy@osp.state.nh.us >.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### Violet WILLIAMS v. Dr. M. S. LOVE et al.

No. 47081.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 9, 1973.

Stephen L. Beach, Jackson, for appellant.

Bryant & Stennis, White & Morse, Gulf-port, Simrall, Aultman & Pope, Dorrance Aultman, Hattiesburg, for appellees.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; Harry G. Walker, Judge.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and ROBERTSON; JJ.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32(a)











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of Dataram Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), John H.
Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.











July
29,
2010                      /s/
John H. Freeman


_____________________________________


John
H. Freeman


President
and Chief Executive Officer





[A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Dataram Corporation and will be retained by Dataram Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 1988 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 085

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Change AFM 1.0 $ 85.00 $ 85.00 

### 120 $ 10,200.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 10,200 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also b e used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include sp ecific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Clifford Edward Vadakin, Appellant. 

County Court, Columbia County,

October 28, 1953.

*Burns F. Barford, Jr.,*for appellant.

*J ohn N. McLaren, District Attorney,*for respondent.

Coinsror, J.

This defendant was convicted before Justice of the Peace Keller of the Town of Kinderhook on the 25th day of April, 1953, for violating subdivision 8 of section 14 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law and was fined the sum of $100.

*905This conviction must he set aside for two reasons. The proof as to the weight of the vehicle was introduced over the objection of the defendant that the proper foundation for its proof had not been laid in that there was no proof that the scales upon which the vehicle was weighed were accurate. There is no presumption that the scales of the State of New York are accurate, and where an objection is made that the proper foundation has not been laid, it is incumbent upon the State, as it should be upon any individual, to first establish the accuracy of its scales.

Moreover, this subdivision of the statute is in my opinion unconstitutional in that it violates the due process clause of the State Constitution (art. I, § 6) in that it deprives a man of his livelihood without due process of law. A defendant charged with the violation of this section, as in the case at bar, can be convicted of a crime which he does not know that he committed, and which it is impossible for him to ascertain whether or not he is committing. The driver of this vehicle did not load the truck and it would be impossible for him to check the weight of the truck. Especially would it be impossible for him to check the weight upon each of the wheels and the drive wheels of his tractor. The driver-employee of the truck herein received from his employer a bill of lading specifying the weight of the load on the truck. That weight was within the limits of the load for the type of vehicle he was driving. When this has been done, he has done everything humanly possible for him to do in order to comply with the law. Yet, if it so turns out that the vehicle delivered to him by his employer exceeds the limits allowed by law, he may be found guilty of violating the section and upon several convictions he is subject to having his license to drive a vehicle taken from him and thus has been deprived of his opportunity to earn a living, all of which can occur without his knowingly having violated any statute of the State.

I therefore hold that insofar as the statute applies to persons who unknowingly violate this section, it is unconstitutional.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Korea, South source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
LYNTON GROUP, INC.

                       PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES


Registrant:

Lynton Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation.


Subsidiaries, all of whose voting  securities  are  owned  directly or
indirectly by the Registrant:

Lynton Jet Centre, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

Lynton Aviation Services, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

Lynton Properties, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

Ramapo Helicopters, Inc., a New York corporation.

Lynton Aircraft Maintenance Services, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

Lynton Group Limited, organized under the laws of England.

Lynton  Aviation  Limited,  organized  under  the  laws  of England.

European Helicopters Limited, organized under the laws of England.

Magec Aviation Limited, organized under the laws of England.

Air Hanson Limited, organized under the laws of England.

Air Hanson Engineering Limited, organized under the laws of England.

Air  Hanson  Aircraft  Sales  Limited,  organized  under  the  laws of
England.


Subsidiary,  20%  of  whose  voting  securities  are owned directly or
indirectly by the Registrant:

LynStar Aviation, Inc., a New York corporation.
#### STATE ex rel. GREATER WASHINGTON INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENTS, INC., and Mark Rollinson, Relators, v. The Honorable Henry L. BALABAN, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-1235.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 12, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.