alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013296EN.01000101.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6979 — DSM R&D Solutions/Maastricht UMC-Holding/Device Company JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 296/01

On 4 October 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Dutch and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6979. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6979. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                              <C>              <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                SEP-30-1998      SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1998      OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1998      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 6,410            8,036
<SECURITIES>                                           7,240            8,038
<RECEIVABLES>                                          7,378            4,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                           1,026              840
<INVENTORY>                                            7,440            6,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      28,164           27,920
<PP&E>                                                24,952           27,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                         9,513           11,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        44,304           38,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 13,713            9,487
<BONDS>                                                3,118            3,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0                0
<PREFERRED>                                                0                0
<COMMON>                                                  91               91
<OTHER-SE>                                            27,382           25,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          44,304           38,517
<SALES>                                               11,132           10,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      11,660           11,234
<CGS>                                                  5,999            5,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          5,999            5,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       4,318            4,229
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       122              116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        1,465            1,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                              92              126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    1,373            1,137
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0                0
<CHANGES>                                                  0                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           1,373            1,137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0.15             0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.14             0.12
        

</TABLE>
From: McKaughan, Colleen

Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 4:31 PM

To: vmartz@srmaterials.com; Gary.Bohnee@SRPMIC-nsn.gov

Cc: Nudd, Gregory; Webb, Thomas; Kelly, Shaheerah; ecm@azdeq.gov

Subject: New Court-Ordered Deadline for Regional Haze FIP

Dear Verle and Gary,

I’m writing to let you know that the court-ordered deadline for EPA to propose a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) 

addressing regional haze in Arizona has been extended to September 6, 2013. Our deadline for final action on Arizona’s State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) remains July 15, 2013. The deadline for commenting on our December 20, 2012 proposed action 

on Arizona’s SIP is March 6, 2013. 

If EPA finalizes disapproval of any aspect of the Arizona Regional Haze SIP, we are obligated to propose and later finalize a FIP 

to address these disapproved portions. The deadlines for these proposed and final actions are set in a consent decree. The 

parties to the consent decree recently agreed to extend these deadlines and the United States District Court for the District 

of Columbia issued an order granting a motion to amend the consent decree to reflect these new deadlines. The new 

deadlines of September 6, 2013 for the proposed action and February 6, 2014 for the final action provide the agency more 

time for the technical work that will form the basis of the FIP. 

If you are planning to provide technical information that you think would be helpful to EPA in preparing our FIP proposal, 

please provide that information no later than May 10, 2013. This will allow us enough time to review and consider the 

information in preparing the proposal.

In the case of Kiln 4 at the Phoenix Cement Company in Clarksdale, Arizona, we are particularly interested in getting your 

feedback regarding the effectiveness of potential controls and the control costs estimated by our contractor, as well as 

information about whether the kiln employs existing inherent or add-on controls for minimizing nitrogen oxide emissions. 

If you have any questions, please let me know. We look forward to hearing from you soon. I have contacted Gary in order to 

arrange the meetings and consultation that the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community has requested. We are awaiting 

potential dates.

Colleen McKaughan

520-498-0118

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Program Files (x86)\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\9135381906324229... 5/13/2013
# C_2012070EN.01000801.xml

| 8.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6475 — AXA REIM/CBRE PFCE Management/Warsaw III)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 70/04

On 5 March 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6475. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6475. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-125870) of Consolidated Edison, Inc. relating to the Con Edison Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and CashPayment Plan; (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-04463-99) relating to the Con Edison 1996 Stock Option Plan; (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-118159) relating to The Consolidated Edison Stock Purchase Plan;(iv) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-108903) relating to The Consolidated Edison, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan and Senior Executive Restricted Stock Awards; and (v) the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-136267) relating todebt and equity securities of Consolidated Edison, Inc. of our report dated February 19, 2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

New York, NewYork 

February 23, 2009
**Exhibit 32(d)**

 

**The Dayton Powerand Light Company**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Theundersigned officer of The Dayton Power and Light Company (the “Issuer”) herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Issuer’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2007, which this certificateaccompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Issuer as of the dates and for theperiods expressed therein.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Issuer and will beretained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 
|   /s/  John J. Gillen                    |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John  J. Gillen                                    |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date:February 22, 2008

 

The foregoing certificate is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of theIssuer’s Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934: RULES 13a-14, 13a-15, 15d-14, and 15d-15 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Gerald L. Jensen, certify that:
-  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Croff Enterprises, Inc.; 
-  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or  omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report; 
-  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash  flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
-  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
- Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
- Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  
- Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 
-  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to  the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:
- All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
- Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 
Date: March 28, 2007 By
 /s/ Gerald L. Jensen  Gerald L. Jensen,  Chief Executive Officer
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.05 **Contact:**  Malkia McLeod
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, JAN., 15 2010 Media Advisory — National 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to West Columbia, S.C. Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 
13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 
2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why "I count!" and view messages from other road tour participants.
      For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Maria Di lulio PAVAN, a/k/a Maria Di lulio, Petitioner, v. Benjamin PAVAN, Respondent.

No. 42379.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 27, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 211.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3051 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3051

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide that certain property located in the State of Oklahoma owned 
by an Indian housing authority for the purpose of providing low-income 
housing shall be treated as Federal property under the Act of September 
               30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress).






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3051

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To provide that certain property located in the State of Oklahoma owned 
by an Indian housing authority for the purpose of providing low-income 
housing shall be treated as Federal property under the Act of September 
               30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA OWNED BY INDIAN 
              HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR PURPOSE OF PROVIDING LOW-INCOME 
              HOUSING TREATED AS FEDERAL PROPERTY UNDER PUBLIC LAW 874, 
              81ST CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Any real property located in the State of Oklahoma 
that--
            (1) is owned by an Indian housing authority and used for 
        low-income housing (including housing assisted under the mutual 
        help homeownership opportunity program under section 202 of the 
        United States Housing Act of 1937), and
            (2) at any time prior to the date of the enactment of this 
        Act--
                    (A) was designated by treaty as tribal land, or
                    (B) satisfied the definition of Federal property 
                under section 403(1)(A) of the Act of September 30, 
                1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress),
shall be treated as Federal property under such section.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to 
payments made under the Act of September 30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st 
Congress) for fiscal year 1994.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of World Air Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Towe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



/s/ Michael W. ToweMichael W. ToweChief Financial Officerof World Air Holdings, Inc.


July 3, 2007



32
NOVEMBER 2009 ADVANCE REPORT 

The November 2009 Advance Report is not available. The Census Bureau encountered a 

processing error when revising historic seasonally adjusted data for the November 

Advance and Full Reports. We re-issued the November 2009 Full Report in a Special 

Release on January 29. See 

http://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/historical_data/pressreleases/prel/2009/nov09p

rel.pdf. We, however, were unable to recreate the November Advance Report. For 

additional information, please contact Chris Savage or Jessica Young at 301 763-4832.
DENIED and Opinion Filed March 15, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-24-00298-CV

IN RE MICHAEL A. RUFF, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-11-02825-2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness

Before the Court is relator’s March 12, 2024 petition for writ of habeas corpus 

or, alternatively, writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief. In 

his petition, relator challenges a trial court’s writ of attachment commanding that 

relator be taken into custody and delivered to jail for his failure to appear at a showcause hearing and to ensure his appearance at the next hearing. In his emergency 

motion, relator seeks a stay of the writ of attachment and all proceedings related to 

his contempt or incarceration pending this Court’s action on his petition. 

After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, whether properly 

construed as a writ of habeas corpus or a writ of mandamus, we conclude that relator 
–2–

has failed to demonstrate entitlement to relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

We also deny as moot relator’s emergency motion.

240298f.p05

/Robbie Partida-Kipness//

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS

JUSTICE
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases News Conferences
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				News Releases
 				**Press Kits**
 				Tip Sheets
 **Event Materials** Presentation:Slides [PDF] Media Advisory: Census Bureau Webinar to Release County Business Statistics News Release: Census Bureau Reports U.S. Employer Firms Show Declines in Number of Establishments and Employees | Spanish version Tables:  
    - Table 1.   2009 County Business Patterns w/Noise, Sector Summary [PDF]
    - Table 2.   2009 County Business Patterns w/Noise, State Summary [PDF]
    - Table 3.   2009 County Business Patterns w/Noise, Top 50 Counties by Number of Establishments [PDF] Speaker Biographies: 
   - Shirin Ahmed, chief of the Economic Planning and Coordination Division, U.S. Census Bureau
    - Stephen H. Andrews, senior economist, assistant to the chief, National Income and Wealth Division, 
       U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
    - Stanley Rolark, chief, Public Information Office Background Materials Searching and Accessing Survey of Business Owners Data on American FactFinder [PDF]
County Business Patterns Web site
How to access County Business Patterns [PDF]
Census Bureau Blog entry: County Business Patterns
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy