alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012368EN.01001001.xml

| 28.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 November 2012

2012/C 368/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2961 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4581 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80810 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6420 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2043 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3575 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,304 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 280,06 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0905 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5050 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3240 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2372 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2846 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0449 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5743 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5832 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 406,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,4140 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0647 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5525 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 444,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9492 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,908 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,1510 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,764 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6878 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8137 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,7520 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2961

JPY

Japanese yen

106,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4581

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80810

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6420

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2043

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3575

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,304

HUF

Hungarian forint

280,06

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0905

RON

Romanian leu

4,5050

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3240

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2372

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2846

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0449

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5743

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5832

KRW

South Korean won

1 406,92

ZAR

South African rand

11,4140

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0647

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5525

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 444,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9492

PHP

Philippine peso

52,908

RUB

Russian rouble

40,1510

THB

Thai baht

39,764

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6878

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8137

INR

Indian rupee

71,7520

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Paul J.B, Murphy, III, as Chairman andChief Executive Officer of New World Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 29,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 6, 2005 | By: /s/ PAUL J. B. MURPHY, III       |   |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Paul J. B. Murphy, III               |
|               | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|               | Principal Executive Officer          |

 

----
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-13582

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-10014-JEM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

DANIEL MICHAEL SZABO, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(January 9, 2017)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Szabo appeals his sentence of 27 months of imprisonment for failing 

to obey an order from the Coast Guard to heave to his vessel. 18 U.S.C. 

Case: 16-13582 Date Filed: 01/09/2017 Page: 1 of 3 
2

§ 2237(a)(1). Szabo argues that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because 

the district court denied his request for a two-level reduction of his offense level 

for acceptance of responsibility. See United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual 

§ 3E1.1(a) (Nov. 2015). We affirm.

The district court did not clearly err by finding that Szabo had not accepted 

responsibility for his offense. Szabo offered to plead guilty to failing to heave to 

his vessel, but in so doing he refused to recognize that his conduct was unlawful, to 

express any “remorse or contrition” for his wrongdoing, see United States v. 

Rodriguez, 959 F.2d 193, 195 (11th Cir. 1992), or to disclose all of the misdeeds 

for which he was accountable, see U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 cmt. n.1(A). Szabo repeatedly 

disregarded marine officers’ orders to heave to and endangered them and other 

boaters. Szabo, who was inebriated, led the officers on a high-speed chase through 

populated waterways; fired his gun multiple times at the officers; sped toward their 

vessel while daring them to veer away; rammed their vessel with his dinghy;

insulted the officers by calling them “water pigs”; and boasted that he could not be 

caught unless shot in the forehead. Eventually, Szabo collided with the Coast 

Guard vessel. The officers arrested Szabo after subduing him with pepper spray. 

Szabo testified and disavowed virtually any memory of the incident. The district 

court, which enjoyed “a unique position to evaluate” Szabo, discredited his

testimony. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 cmt. n.5. “[W]e are [not] left with the definite and 

Case: 16-13582 Date Filed: 01/09/2017 Page: 2 of 3 
3

firm conviction that a mistake has been committed” by denying Szabo a reduction 

for acceptance of responsibility. See Crystal Entm’t & Filmworks, Inc. v. Jurado, 

643 F.3d 1313, 1320 (11th Cir. 2011) (internal quotation marks and citation 

omitted). Szabo’s sentence is procedurally reasonable.

We AFFIRM Szabo’s sentence.

Case: 16-13582 Date Filed: 01/09/2017 Page: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF AEARO CORPORATION AS OF MARCH 31, 2000
(UNAUDITED) AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND 1999
CONTAINED IN AEARO CORPORATION'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,149
<PP&E>                                          96,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,290
<BONDS>                                        198,158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   281,247
<SALES>                                        149,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,624
<CGS>                                           80,079
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,628
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,214
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (17.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (17.82)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 30, 2018

s1022 

# Order

Clerk October 30, 2018

157091

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157091

COA: 338899

Wayne CC: 10

- 010389

- FC

VINCENT LeCURTIS MOORE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 5.1
                     OPINION AND CONSENT OF BROAD AND CASSEL

                                BROAD AND CASSEL
                          201 South Biscayne Boulevard
                                   Suite 3000
                              Miami, Florida 33131



                                 August 17, 2000



NHancement Technologies Inc.
6663 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, California  94588


         Re:      NHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
                  REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-3

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         You have requested our opinion with respect to the shares of the
Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), included
in the Registration Statement on Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 (the "Form S-3")
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act").

         As counsel to the Company, we have examined the original or certified
copies of such records of the Company, and such agreements, certificates of
public officials, certificates of officers or representatives of the Company and
others, and such other documents as we deem relevant and necessary for the
opinions expressed in this letter. In such examination, we have assumed the
genuineness of all signatures on original documents, and the conformity to
original documents of all copies submitted to us as conformed or photostatic
copies. As to various questions of fact material to such opinions, we have
relied upon statements or certificates of officials and representatives of the
Company and others.

         Based on, and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the
shares of Common Stock being registered in the Form S-3 will, once issued as
contemplated under the Form S-3, shall have been duly and validly issued, and
shall be fully paid and non-assessable.

         In rendering this opinion, we advise you that members of this Firm are
members of the Bar of the State of Florida, and we express no opinion herein
concerning the applicability or effect of any laws of any other jurisdiction,
except the securities laws of the United States of America referred to herein.
<PAGE>

         This opinion has been prepared and is to be construed in accordance
with the Report on Standards for Florida Opinions, dated April 8, 1991, as
amended and supplemented, issued by the Business Law Section of The Florida Bar
(the "Report"). The Report is incorporated by reference into this opinion.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Form S-8. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we are included
within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Securities Act, or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                /s/ Broad and Cassel

                                                BROAD AND CASSEL
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
, Appellant,

v.

W.M., a minor child, by and through his guardian JACQUELINE WEAVER, and EARL J. LLOYD, Appellee s

.

No s . 4D 15

- 1194 and 4D15

- 1349

[ July 13, 2017 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s and cross

- appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Patti Englander Henning

, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE09025532 (26)

.

Melinda S. Thornton and Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & K issane, P.A., Miami, for appellant/cross

- appellee Progressive American Insurance Company.

Paul Morris of Law Offices of Paul Morris, P.A., Miami, and David L. Deehl of Deehl PLLC, Coral Gables, for appellee/cross

- appellant W.M., a minor child, by and thro ugh his guardian Jacqueline Weaver.

Weslee L. Ferron, Daniel A. Martinez and Kelly J. McAuley of Martinez Denbo, LLC, St. Petersburg, for appellee/cross

- appellant Earl J. Lloyd.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
ElJ!!1!ght January 4, 2008

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Mr. Damien Houlihan

Office of Ecosystem Protection

S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1

One Congress Street, Mail Code CIP

Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2023

Response to Information Request pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act to Supercede

Previous Letter dated December 30, 2004 for Mount Tom Station NPDES Permit Reissuance -

INPDES Permit No. : MA0005339)

Dear Mr. Houlihan:

Enclosed is the Cooling Water Information Document for the Mount Tom Generating Station

(NPDES Permit No. MA0005339) as required in Attachment A of your September 11 , 2007

letter Information Request pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act to Supercede

Previous Letter dated December 30, 2004 for Mount Tom Station NPDES Permit Reissuance 

NPDES Permit No. : MA0005339. Attachment B of the letter Requirements to SatisfY Collection

and Reporting of Impingement Monitoring Data is currently in progress and a final report wil be

submitted to EPA by December 31 2008 as required.

We are currently attempting to collect data as required in Attachment C, Requirements to SatisfY

Collection and Reporting of Ichthyoplankton Sampling Data as the required Section 7

consultation between EP A and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has not concluded.

NMFS Protected Resources Division has verbally agreed that this collection wil not affect

endangered shortnose sturgeon eggs and larvae as it is well documented that the shortnose

sturgeon spawn 20 miles upstream in Montague, MA, shortnose sturgeon eggs are demersal, and

adhesive and larval dispersion is not far downstream from the spawning ground. However John

Nagle, EP A, has indicated to our consultant Chris Tomichek, Kleinschmidt Associates, that the

Section 7 consultation has not been concluded as there are questions between the two agencies as

to how to document the consultation record. We are waiting to proceed with the required

sampling when EP A and NMFS resolves this issue and allows us to sample.

Should you have any questions, please call me at 413.536.9562.

Sincerely,

Murray

Station Manager
cc: Paul Hogan MA DEP

Gerald Szal, MA DEP

Julie Crocker NMFS

maronDeMeo, EPA

James Merchant, FirstLight Power Resources

Richard Merchant FirstLight Power Resources

Chris Tomichek, Kleinschmidt Associates
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles J. Hinkaty, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Del Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2006

                                                     /s/ Charles J. Hinkaty
                                                     ----------------------
                                                         Charles J. Hinkaty
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
#### In re Adoption of Minor Child by William S. BEVELS and Flora Mae Revels, his wife.

Nos. 546, 652.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 17, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 2, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk William Peterson

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) [947A
Exhibit 10.1


 


USELL.COM, INC.


171 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor,
PH


New York, NY 10016


212.213.6805


 


July __, 2016


 


Dear Brian and Scott:


 


This letter agreement
documents our understanding regarding your Placement Rights provided under Section 7.4 of that certain Stock Purchase Agreement
among BST Distribution, Inc., each of you and uSell.com, Inc. (the “Company”) dated October 23, 2015 (“SPA”).
The Company is implementing a Management Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which is attached as Schedule
A to this letter agreement. In consideration for each of you waiving your Placement Rights and amending your respective Employment
Agreement dated October 23, 2015 (“Employment Agreement”) by replacing the Bonus Target (under Section 4(b) with your
respective percentage rights under the Plan, you each will be allocated 30% of the Plan. Except for the waiver of your Placement
Rights and replacement of the Bonus Target with your rights under the Plan, you are not waiving any other rights under the SPA
or your Employment Agreement.


 


Upon execution of all
parties to this letter agreement and upon approval by the Company’s Board of Directors, the SPA and each of your respective
Employment Agreements shall be amended solely to the extent provided in this letter agreement.


 


If you are agreeable
to the foregoing, please sign below.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Nikhil Raman, Chief Executive Officer


 


	We agree:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Brian Tepfer	 	Scott Tepfer	 
	 	 	 	 
	BST Distribution, Inc.	 	We Sell Cellular, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 	 	 	By:	 	 
	Nikhil Raman, Chairman	 	Nikhil Raman, Manager	 


 




     


     


    

 


Schedule A


Management Incentive Compensation Plan


 


See attached.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Richard A. Wisot, the chief
financial officer of Transpro, Inc. (the "issuer"), does hereby certify that the
report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the "report") fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Richard A. Wisot
--------------------
Richard A. Wisot
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)
Transpro, Inc.
August 18, 2004

                                       24
```
# C_2013215EN.01000101.xml

| 27.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/1

---

2013/C 215/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 207, 20.7.2013

OJ C 207, 20.7.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 189, 29.6.2013

OJ C 178, 22.6.2013

OJ C 171, 15.6.2013

OJ C 164, 8.6.2013

OJ C 156, 1.6.2013

OJ C 147, 25.5.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
260 La. 1135

#### Max J. HEINBERG v. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY of the State Louisiana.

No. 52214.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Max J. Heinberg applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Civil Service Commission. 256 So.2d 747.

Writ refused. We find no error in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.