45532 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

language from the VPMD Procedures 

Manual into the regulatory text. 

Definitions 

As a result of the codification process, 

some additional terms were added to 

the definitions section. These include 

Audit, Clean piping, Clean scanning, 

Covert audit, Covert surveillance, 

Emissions analyzer, Emissions 

inspection system or EIS, Fleet, Gas cap 

test, Overt audit, Pretesting, and Vehicle 

information database or VID. Definitions 

adopted for these terms are those that 

are commonly used in the industry or 

similar to terms defined in the federal 

regulations. We propose to approve 

these definitions. 

Other Revisions 

In the process of codifying language 

from the Procedures Manual, the I/M 

rules were reorganized with some 

sections being moved from one 

numbered section to another. Useless 

and/or anachronistic references were 

removed or revised to be more 

meaningful. We propose to approve 

these non-substantive changes. 

III. Proposed Action 

EPA is proposing to approve revisions 

to the New Mexico SIP for the City of 

Albuquerque/Bernalillo County 

submitted on July 28, 2011. These 

include revisions to the fuel type subject 

to testing, the model years subject to 

testing, certain test procedures, an 

opportunity for a time extension for 

motorists that are financially incapable 

of paying for repairs of $300 or more, 

codification of procedures from the 

Procedures Manual, addition of 

definitions, and other non-substantive 

revisions. We believe these revisions 

will enhance the SIP and improve the 

effectiveness of the I/M program. This 

action is being taken under section 110 

of the Act. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this 

action merely proposes to approve state 

law as meeting Federal requirements 

and does not impose additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

state law. For that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 20, 2012. 

Samuel Coleman, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2012–18795 Filed 7–31–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2008–0520; FRL–9708–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Michigan; 

Detroit-Ann Arbor Nonattainment Area; 

Fine Particulate Matter 2005 Base Year 

Emissions Inventory 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 2005 

base year emissions inventory, a portion 

of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision submitted by the Michigan 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(MDEQ) on June 13, 2008. The 

emissions inventory is part of the June 

13, 2008, SIP revision that Michigan 

submitted to meet the nonattainment 

requirements related to the Detroit-Ann 

Arbor (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, 

Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and 

Wayne Counties) nonattainment area for 

the 1997 annual PM2.5 national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS). EPA is 

taking this action pursuant to sections 

110 and 172 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before August 31, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2008–0520, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 

4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2008– 

0520. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Proposed Rules 45533 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional instructions on 

submitting comments, go to Section I of 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

of this document. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Carolyn 

Persoon, Environmental Engineer, at 

(312) 353–8290, before visiting the 

Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carolyn Persoon, Environmental 

Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8290, 

persoon.carolyn@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

II. Analysis of the State’s Submittal 

III. Proposed Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38652), EPA 

established an annual PM2.5 NAAQS at 

15.0 micrograms per cubic meter (mg/ 

m3) based on a 3-year average of annual 

mean PM2.5 concentrations. On January 

5, 2005 (70 FR 944), EPA published its 

air quality designations and 

classifications for the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS based upon air quality 

monitoring data for calendar years 

2001–2003. These designations became 

effective on April 5, 2005. The DetroitAnn Arbor area (Livingston, Macomb, 

Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, 

and Wayne Counties) was designated 

nonattainment for the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS. 

Designation of an area as 

nonattainment starts the process for a 

state to develop and submit to EPA a 

SIP under title I, part D of the CAA. This 

SIP must include, among other 

elements, a demonstration of how the 

NAAQS will be attained in the 

nonattainment area as expeditiously as 

practicable, but no later than the date 

required by the CAA. Under CAA 

section 172(b), a state has up to three 

years after an area’s designation as 

nonattainment to submit its SIP to EPA. 

For the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, these SIPs 

were due April 5, 2008. See 40 CFR 

51.1002(a). 

On June 13, 2008, Michigan submitted 

an attainment demonstration and 

associated reasonably available control 

measures (RACM), a reasonable further 

progress (RFP) plan, contingency 

measures, a 2005 base year emissions 

inventory and other planning SIP 

revisions related to attainment of the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS in Detroit 

Ann-Arbor area. Subsequently, on July 

5, 2011, MDEQ submitted a 

redesignation request for the DetroitAnn Arbor area showing that the area 

had attained the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS based upon complete, qualityassured and certified ambient air 

monitoring data for the 2007–2009 and 

2008–2010 design value periods. On 

July 5, 2012 (77 FR 39659) EPA 

proposed to determine that the area has 

attained the 1997 annual and 2006 24- 

hour PM2.5 NAAQS based on the most 

recent three-years of complete certified 

data. If EPA finalizes these proposed 

determinations, it would suspend the 

obligation for the area to submit an 

attainment demonstration and 

associated RACM, RFP plan, 

contingency measures, and other 

planning SIP revisions related to 

attainment of each of these PM2.5

standards so long as the area continues 

to attain the NAAQS. See 40 CFR 

51.1004(c). 

With regard to the 1997 PM2.5

standard, EPA notes that its proposed 

determination of attainment did not 

suspend the obligation for the State to 

submit an emissions inventory under 

CAA section 172(c)(3), and EPA is 

therefore proposing to act upon this 

portion of the submission. Section 

172(c)(3) of the CAA requires 

submission and approval of a 

comprehensive, accurate, and current 

inventory of actual emissions. EPA is 

proposing to approve the emissions 

inventory portion of the SIP revision 

submitted by MDEQ on June 13, 2008, 

as meeting the requirements of section 

172(c)(3). 

II. Analysis of the State’s Submittal 

As discussed above, section 172(c)(3) 

of the CAA requires areas to submit a 

comprehensive, accurate and current 

inventory of actual emissions from all 

sources of the relevant pollutant or 

pollutants in such area. MDEQ selected 

2005 as base year for the emissions 

inventory per 40 CFR 51.1008(b). 

Emissions contained in MDEQ’s June 

13, 2008, SIP revision cover the general 

source categories of electric generating 

unit (EGU) point sources, non-EGU 

point sources, area sources, non-road 

mobile sources, marine-airport-rail 

(MAR) sources, on-road mobile sources, 

and modeled ammonia (NH3) sources. A 

detailed discussion of the emissions 

inventory development can be found in 

Appendix C of the MDEQ submittal; a 

summary is provided below. 

The table below provides a summary 

of the annual 2005 emissions of nitrogen 

oxides (NOX), direct PM2.5, volatile 

organic compounds (VOCs), sulfur 

dioxide (SO2), and modeled NH3

included in MDEQ’s submittal. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

45534 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

TABLE 1—2005 ANNUAL NOX EMISSIONS FOR THE DETROIT-ANN ARBOR AREA

[Tons per year] 

County Area source Non-EGU 

point source 

On-road 

source 

Nonroad 

source 

EGU point 

source MAR source 

Livingston ......................................................................... 647.95 654.19 5417.90 1288.10 5.91 83.97 

Macomb ........................................................................... 2498.84 720.91 14121.20 5054.00 134.42 589.24 

Monroe ............................................................................. 606.83 3774.97 5454.40 1404.17 38483.26 958.21 

Oakland ............................................................................ 4535.97 1096.91 31088.00 7153.48 71397 822.22 

St. Clair ............................................................................ 563.69 1978.16 3812.60 1519.17 19690.31 557.31 

Washtenaw ...................................................................... 1056.74 1050.26 9962.20 2999.65 1.45 203.64 

Wayne .............................................................................. 6039.67 9408.81 43981.40 9410.39 11369.40 4166.30 

TABLE 2—2005 ANNUAL DIRECT PM2.5 EMISSIONS FOR THE DETROIT-ANN ARBOR AREA

[Tons per year] 

County Area source Non-EGU 

point source 

On-road 

source 

Nonroad 

source 

EGU point 

source MAR source 

Livingston ......................................................................... 1424.61 7.35 89.47 120.62 0.10 2.55 

Macomb ........................................................................... 468.79 113.13 265.44 339.65 12.83 13.91 

Monroe ............................................................................. 1176.54 668.31 91.00 121.96 597.66 29.11 

Oakland ............................................................................ 761.34 124.44 559.86 614.54 8.86 23.91 

St. Clair ............................................................................ 341.99 112.50 71.06 108.58 142.13 18.30 

Washtenaw ...................................................................... 245.58 86.86 170.02 2632.17 0.02 6.02 

Wayne .............................................................................. 920.34 1342.36 792.05 644.00 352.76 99.30 

TABLE 3—2005 ANNUAL VOC EMISSIONS FOR THE DETROIT-ANN ARBOR AREA

[Tons per year] 

County Area source Non-EGU 

point source 

On-road 

source 

Nonroad 

source 

EGU point 

source MAR source 

Livingston ......................................................................... 4338.29 176.95 1696.90 1927.32 0.19 23.38 

Macomb ........................................................................... 11807.62 2271.05 5784.70 4910.60 39.67 114.92 

Monroe ............................................................................. 3663.62 3555.73 1742.60 1893.76 300.92 61.48

Oakland ............................................................................ 17387.40 2487.15 11918.00 9862.11 8.54 93.30

St. Clair ............................................................................ 2671.18 1379.00 1550.90 2166.18 285.49 43.26 

Washtenaw ...................................................................... 5406.23 388.83 3348.70 2632.17 0 19.96 

Wayne .............................................................................. 24887.81 6319.64 16931.10 8396.96 175.34 460.03 

TABLE 4—2005 ANNUAL SO2 EMISSIONS FOR THE DETROIT-ANN ARBOR AREA

[Tons per year] 

County Area source Non-EGU 

point source 

On-road 

source 

Nonroad 

source 

EGU point 

source MAR source 

Livingston ......................................................................... 226.78 13.70 71.32 139.72 0.07 7.53 

Macomb ........................................................................... 930.59 48.26 221.44 426.07 4.32 38.28 

Monroe ............................................................................. 181.05 7733.15 72.83 139.75 120386.70 82.64 

Oakland ............................................................................ 1187.41 274.99 458.48 683.20 3.43 64.67 

St. Clair ............................................................................ 238.80 1752.75 59.06 125.05 66576.72 72.99

Washtenaw ...................................................................... 325.00 20.75 136.90 342.20 0.28 16.93 

Wayne .............................................................................. 1540.36 6396.53 647.06 883.35 40780.46 398.38 

TABLE 5—2005 ANNUAL NH3 EMISSIONS FOR THE DETROIT-ANN ARBOR AREA

[Tons per year] 

County Area source Non-EGU 

point source 

On-road 

source 

Nonroad 

source 

EGU point 

source MAR source Modeled NH3

Livingston ................................................. 3.32 0.15 200.7 1.30 0 0.05 280.31 

Macomb ................................................... 13.42 16.24 645.87 4.42 0 0.27 224.2 

Monroe ..................................................... 2.88 79.41 205.50 1.44 2.59 0.57 638.69 

Oakland .................................................... 24.91 19.73 1319.26 7.24 0 0.44 84.74 

St. Clair .................................................... 3.29 10.33 171.71 1.71 11.78 0.34 273.56 

Washtenaw .............................................. 6.71 4.48 388.25 2.66 0 0.12 738.07 

Wayne ...................................................... 32.01 132.61 1859.10 8.48 1.80 1.46 113.69 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Proposed Rules 45535 

States develop the 172(c)(3) emissions 

inventory by the incorporation of data 

from multiple sources. States were 

required to develop and submit to EPA 

a triennial emissions inventory 

according to the Consolidated Emissions 

Reporting Rule for all source categories 

(i.e., point, area, nonroad mobile and 

on-road mobile). This inventory often 

forms the basis for data that states 

update with more recent information 

and data that they use in their 

attainment demonstration modeling 

inventory. Such was the case in the 

development of the 2005 emissions 

inventory that MDEQ submitted in its 

attainment SIP for the Detroit-Ann 

Arbor area. The 2005 emissions 

inventory was based on data developed 

with the Lake Michigan Air Directors 

Consortium (LADCO) and the Midwest 

Regional Planning Organization (MRPO) 

and submitted by the states to the 2005 

National Emissions Inventory (NEI). 

Data from many databases, studies and 

models (e.g., Vehicle Miles Traveled, 

fuel programs, the NONROAD 2002 

model data for commercial marine 

vessels, locomotives and Clean Air 

Market Division, etc.) resulted in the 

inventory submitted in this SIP. The 

data were developed according to 

current EPA emissions inventory 

guidance ‘‘Emissions Inventory 

Guidance for Implementation of Ozone 

and Particulate Matter National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) and Regional Haze 

Regulations’’ (August 2005) and a 

quality assurance project plan that was 

developed through LADCO and 

approved by EPA. 

EPA has reviewed MDEQ’s emissions 

inventory and proposes to determine 

that it is adequate for the purposes of 

meeting section 172(c)(3) emissions 

inventory requirement. Further, EPA’s 

review shows that the emissions were 

developed consistent with the CAA, 

implementing regulations and EPA 

guidance for emission inventories. 

III. Proposed Action 

EPA is proposing to approve the 2005 

base year emissions inventory portion of 

the SIP revision submitted by MDEQ on 

June 13, 2008. EPA is making the 

determination that this action is 

consistent with sections 110 and 172 of 

the CAA. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed 

action merely approves state law as 

meeting federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 F43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed rule does 

not have tribal implications as specified 

by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the Commonwealth, and EPA 

notes that it will not impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and record-keeping 

requirements. 

Dated: July 13, 2012. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2012–18799 Filed 7–31–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0163; FRL–9355–8] 

RIN 2070–ZA16 

Aldicarb; Proposed Tolerance Actions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to revoke 

certain tolerances for the insecticide and 

nematocide aldicarb because, in followup to voluntary requests from a 

registrant, EPA amended an aldicarb 

registration to delete specific uses, 

leaving no aldicarb registrations for 

those uses. Also, in accordance with 

current Agency practice, EPA is 

proposing to revise the nomenclature of 

specific tolerances and make minor 

revisions to the tolerance expression for 

aldicarb. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 1, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0163 by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), Mail Code: 28221T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://www.

epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph Nevola, Pesticide Re-evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS