alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases News Conferences
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				News Releases
 				**Press Kits**
 				Tip Sheets
 *Tuesday, May 22 at 2:00 p.m. (EDT)* Media Advisory News Release **Presentation** [PDF] A Step-by-Step Guide to Finding the New ACS Estimates in American FactFinder [WMV] **Speakers:**Roberto Ramirez, chief, Ethnicity and Ancestry Branch, Population DivisionNicholas Jones, chief, Racial Statistics Branch, Population Division
Jackie Mommsen, American FactFinder **New ACS Data Sets in American FactFinder:**The 2006-2010 American Community Survey Selected Population TablesThe 2006-2010 American Community Survey American Indian and Alaska Native Tables **Background Information:**Available tables, thresholds, comparison guidance

ACS brief: The Population with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher by Race and Hispanic Origin: 2006-2010
 
More about the American Community Survey
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Amcast Industrial Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated October
13, 1998, included in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Amcast
Industrial Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Amcast Industrial
Corporation listed in item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement Number 33-2876 on Form S-8 dated November 27,
1987, in Registration Statement Number 33-18690 on Form S-8 dated December 21,
1987, in Registration Statement Number 33-28080 on Form S-8 dated April 11,
1989, in Registration Statement Number 33-28084 on Form S-8 dated April 11,
1989, in Registration Statement Number 33-38176 on Form S-8 dated December 20,
1990, in Registration Statement Number 33-28075 on Form S-3 dated April 11,
1989, in Registration Statement Number 33-61290 on Form S-8 dated April 19,
1993,and in Registration Statement Number 333-00133 on Form S-8 dated January
10, 1996, of our report dated October 13, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our report included
in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Amcast Industrial Corporation and
subsidiaries.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
---------------------

November 20, 1998
Dayton, Ohio
# C_2013105EN.01000901.xml

| 11.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/9

---

Special Report No 1/2013 ‘Has the EU support to the food-processing industry been effective and efficient in adding value to agricultural products?’

2013/C 105/04

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 1/2013 ‘Has the EU support to the food-processing industry been effective and efficient in adding value to agricultural products?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permit issued.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Nature McGinn, ACA Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-8030; email:                         *ACApermits@nsf.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On June 21, 2018, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. The permit was issued on August 7, 2018 to:                

1. Ron Naveen, Oceanites, Inc., Permit No. 2019-001

Suzanne H. Plimpton,

Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.

[FR Doc. 2018-17666 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7**  **378**

GREGORY LYNN GORDON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the We stern District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00441

- RJC )

Submitted : November 2 , 2012 Decided: November 6 , 2012

Before WILKINSON , KEENAN , and THACKER, Circuit Judges
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gregory Lynn Gordon , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Lynn Gordon , a state pretrial detainee **,** seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. A. § 2241 ( West 200 6 & Supp. 2012 ) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstratin g that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court den ies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independ ently reviewed the record and conclude that Gordon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Gordon’s motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# C_2014026EN.01000101.xml

| 29.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7131 — Compal Electronics/Toshiba Television Central Europe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 26/01

On 22 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7131. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7131. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Terry L. Collins, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Argon ST, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: December 14, 2006   /s/ Terry L. Collins   Terry L. Collins  Chief Executive Officer  
78
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                         393,161
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,896,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                   118,218
<INVENTORY>                                  5,094,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,451,247
<PP&E>                                       5,086,143
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,451,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,534,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,215,406
<BONDS>                                        109,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,251
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,194,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,534,099
<SALES>                                     12,382,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,382,551
<CGS>                                        8,077,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,077,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                95,327
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             836,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,141,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,141,973)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,141,973)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.60)
        

</TABLE>
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

June 04, 2004

Mr. J. Brett Busby

Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP

700 Louisiana St., Suite 3600

Houston, TX 77002-2730

Mr. Robert L. Ketchand

Boyer & Ketchand

9 Greenway Plaza, Suite 3100

Houston, TX 77046

Mr. Richard P. Hogan Jr.

Hogan & Hogan, L.L.P.

700 Louisiana St., Suite 4200

Houston, TX 77002-2793

RE:Case Number:  04-0194

Court of Appeals Number:  01-01-00079-CV

Trial Court Number:  97-29163

Style:EMZY T. BARKER, III AND AVA BARKER D/B/A BRUSHY CREEK BRAHMAN CENTER AND BRUSHY CREEK CUSTOM SIRES

v.

WALTER W. ECKMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NOMINEE AND TRUSTEE, ECKMAN, INC., AND LARRY ECKMAN

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas abated the petitions for review filed in the above-referenced case.  See enclosed order.

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Nancy J. Vega, Chief Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 04-0194Page 2**
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50342 Summary Calendar

JOSEPH LOUIS TOVAR ET AL., Plaintiffs, JOSEPH LOUIS TOVAR; ANDREA DE LA CRUZ; LEO SALAS, Plaintiffs-Counter Defendants-Appellants, LUIS R. VERA, JR.; MICHAEL D. BERNARD, Appellants,

versus STEVEN C. HILBIG ET AL., Defendants, STEVEN C. HILBIG; BEXAR COUNTY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-95-CV-384

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Joseph Louis Tovar, Andrea de la Cruz, and Leo Salas have appealed the grant of summary judgment dismissing their actionNo. 98-50342 -2- seeking civil rights and other relief against Bexar County, Texas, and its Criminal District Attorney, Steven C. Hilbig. Appellants have not appealed the judgments dismissing their claims against the other 11 defendants. Attorneys Luis R. Vera, Jr., and Michael D. Bernard appeal the district court’s imposition of sanctions against them, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. The appellants’ brief does not address the bases for the district court’s rejection of their claims. No error is identified. The appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Appellees’ request for their attorneys’ fees to be assessed against appellants, on grounds that the appeal is frivolous, is DENIED. Appellees have not filed a separate motion therefor, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38. APPEAL DISMISSED; RULE 38 DAMAGES DENIED.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Economic Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-191 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030 Press kit
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, OCT. 4, 2012 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Webinar to Discuss Upcoming  2012 Economic Census What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau is conducting a webinar  to discuss the 2012 Economic Census questionnaires that more than 4 million  businesses will receive in late October. The economic census is the U.S.  Government's official five-year measure of American business and the economy. It  provides accurate benchmark statistics that are fundamental building blocks of  economic indicators, including the gross domestic product, monthly retail sales  and the Producer Price Index. The economic census gives businesses the  information they need to make informed decisions that affect the health of  America's economy. Please dial in by phone to listen to a simultaneous audio conference  while viewing the online presentation. A question-and-answer session will  follow the presentation.
 When:
 Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012; 1 p.m. (EDT)
 Who:
 Charles Brady, chief, Customer and Respondent  Outreach Branch, Economic Planning and Coordination Division, U.S. Census  Bureau
  Kari Klinedinst,  survey statistician, Economic Planning and Coordination Division, U.S. Census  Bureau 
  Andrew Hait, data  products and data user liaison, Economic and Planning Coordination Division, U.S.  Census Bureau
 Details:
 **Audio  conference- access information** U.S.:  800-857-9726
  International:  630-395-0300
  Participant  passcode: 2421989**Online  presentation-access information** URL: https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/
  URL  (caption link): http://livewrite.nccsite.com/view/cb1011
  Conference  number: PW2955224
  Audience  passcode: 2421989 Please follow @uscensusbureau on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and Ustream.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3151

To revive and extend until January 1, 1997, the suspension of duty on

bendiocarb.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To revive and extend until January 1, 1997, the suspension

of duty on bendiocarb.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BENDIOCARB.

4 Heading 9902.30.78 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

6 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/96’’.

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

9 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

10 enactment of this Act.
2

•HR 3151 IH

1 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec2 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

3 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro4 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

6 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend7 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

8 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

9 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en10 actment of this Act;

11 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

12 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

13 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

14 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

15 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
# C_2013167EN.01000701.xml

| 13.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6930 — KKR/SMCP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 167/03

On 7 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6930. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6930. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---