alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013176EN.01001201.xml

| 21.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 June 2013

2013/C 176/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3200 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4588 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85450 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6724 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2319 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8500 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,806 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7014 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3183 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5260 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5324 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4323 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3651 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2375 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6927 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6813 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 523,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4884 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0892 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4860 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 100,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2288 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,796 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,9600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,078 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9514 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5380 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,7840 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3200

JPY

Japanese yen

129,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4588

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85450

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6724

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2319

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8500

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,806

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7014

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3183

RON

Romanian leu

4,5260

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5324

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4323

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3651

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2375

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6927

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6813

KRW

South Korean won

1 523,98

ZAR

South African rand

13,4884

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0892

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4860

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 100,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2288

PHP

Philippine peso

57,796

RUB

Russian rouble

42,9600

THB

Thai baht

41,078

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9514

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5380

INR

Indian rupee

78,7840

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40300

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO DANIEL MONTIEL-RUIZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:10-CR-2316-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederalPublic Defender appointed to represent Mario DanielMontielRuiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montiel-Ruiz has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40300 Document: 00511640613 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 11-40300

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-40300 Document: 00511640613 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
#### TIERRA VERDE CITY, INC., and/or Berlanti Construction Company, Inc., and Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, Petitioners, v. Fred BERLANTI, (Deceased) and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 35364.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 23, 1966.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1967.

Blackwell, Walker & Gray and John L. Welborn, Miami, for petitioners.

James T. Earle and Leslie D. Franklin, of Earle, Jones, Chambers & Franklin, W. Gray Dunlap, St. Petersburg, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

DREW, Justice.

Petitioner controverts an order of the Industrial Commission affirming an award of compensation for death benefits.

The deputy found, upon consideration of abundant circumstantial evidence detailed *115in his order, that Fred Berlanti met his death by accident occurring in the scope and course of employment with the petitioner corporation. Our review of the record indicates the award predicated on this finding was properly affirmed, upon application of the rule set out in the recent opinion in Melbourne Airways & Air College, Inc. et al. v. Thompson.1 Additional issues presented, relative to sufficiency of the order and propriety of fees awarded, have been determined in respondent’s favor.

The petition is therefore denied.

THORNAL, C. J., ERVIN, J., and WAYBRIGHT, Circuit Judge, concur.

CALDWELL, J., dissents.

1

. Fla., 190 So.2d 305, opinion filed July 27, 1966.
#### Edward J. McCORMACK, Petitioner, v. SENTINEL STAR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Publishers of the Orlando Sentinel, Brevard edition, Respondent.

No. 40244.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 19, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 238 So.2d 700.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2055 

To allow for the collection of certain user fees by non-Federal entities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2014 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs. MCCASKILL, and Mr. PRYOR) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To allow for the collection of certain user fees by nonFederal entities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corps of Engineers 

5 Cooperative Joint Management Restoration Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHALLENGE COST-SHARING PROGRAM FOR MAN7 AGEMENT OF RECREATION FACILITIES. 

8 Section 225 of the Water Resources Development Act 

9 of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2328) is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2055 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub2 section (d); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(c) USER FEES.— 

6 ‘‘(1) COLLECTION OF FEES.—The Secretary 

7 may allow a non-Federal public or private entity 

8 that has entered into an agreement pursuant to sub9 section (b) to collect user fees for the use of devel10 oped recreation sites and facilities, whether devel11 oped or constructed by that entity or the Depart12 ment of the Army. 

13 ‘‘(2) USE OF FEES.—A non-Federal public or 

14 private entity that collects user fees under para15 graph (1) may— 

16 ‘‘(A) retain up to 100 percent of the fees 

17 collected, as determined by the Secretary; and 

18 ‘‘(B) notwithstanding section 210(b)(4) of 

19 the Flood Control Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 

20 460d–3(b)(4)), use that amount for operation, 

21 maintenance, and management at the recre22 ation site at which the fee is collected. 

23 ‘‘(3) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The authority 

24 of a non-Federal public or private entity under this 

25 subsection shall be subject to such terms and condiVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:29 Mar 01, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2055.IS S2055

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2055 IS

1 tions as the Secretary determines necessary to pro2 tect the interests of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
rAK WHITE 

omey Geneml 

I N. Talol. SAW F 

“tml. TX. 70241 

mo24E47 

The Attorney Generals of Texas 

July 31, 1979 

Ronorable Joa Resweber 

&UT& County Attorney 

1001 Preston, Suite 634 

Houston, Texas 77002 

.Opinion No.. RW-36 

Re: Authority of the Harris 

County Department of R&cation 

to expend tax funds to buy and mail 

Christmas cards 

Dear Mr. .Jtesweber: 

You have. requested our opinion regarding the’ authority of Rarrii 

County Department of Rducation to expend tax funds to buy and mail 

Christmas cards. Article 3, section 52(a) of the Texas Constitution provides: 

Rxcept as otherwise provided by ~this.section, the 

Legislature shall have no power to authorixe any 

county, city, town or other political corpor@on.or 

subdihsion of the State to lend its credit or to grant 

public maney or thing of value in aid of, or to eny 

individu& association or corporation whatsoever, or 

to ..become a stockholder in such Corporatiat, 

associatico cc ‘oompany. 

This office has frequently said .that, in the absence of an adequate quid 

pro quo, a public body has no authcrity to contribute publii, funds to or on 

behalf of an individual or organization. See Attorney General C@nions 

Ii-II89 (1978) (unconditional donation by &y of federal revenue sharing 

funds to a private day care center constitutes an improper grant of public 

fund& R-620 (l976) (county may not contribute public funds to the 

construation of a privately owned and operated livestock show banr); R-397 

U974) (county may not become a dues paying member .of a chambers of 

commerce); R-70 (l973) (school district ma not purchase personal liability 

insurance for school trustees); M-661 (1970) r county has no authority to make 

a grant of public funds to a religious charitable institution); +7197 (19461, 

G-6563 (19431, G-l001 (1939) (county may not contribute funds to a private 

charitable institution). 

In the present instance, it is not asserted thet the county receives any 

benefit from the activity you have described. It is therefore our opinion 

p. 106 
Honorable Joe Resweber - Page TWO (MN-36) 

that article 3, seetiar 52(a) of the Texas Constitution prohibits a county from expending 

public funds for the purchase and mailing of Christmas cards. See also Tex. Canst. art. 8, 

s 3. 

SUMMARY 

Article 3, section 52(a) and article 8, section 3 of the Texas 

Constitution prohibitwe couhty from expenw pubuc fun+ for the 

puMaas and mailing of Christmas cards. 

MARK WHITE " 

Attorney General of ‘bx~ 

JOHNW.I'AINTRR, JR. 

Pit Assistant Attomey Generel 

TRD L. HARTLRY 

Rxecutive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Rick Gil@ 

Assistit Attorney General 

APPROVBD: 

OPINION COMM?lTRR 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

DavidB.Brooka 

Walter Davis 

SUSMGarrieon 

Rick Giii 

William G Reid 

BruceYolmgblood 

p. 107
Exhibit 10.4




 October 10, 2016



Mr. Alfred Lumsdaine, CFO


Sharecare


701 Cool Springs Blvd.


Franklin, TN 37067







Dear Alfred,


You and Healthways, Inc., its subsidiaries, affiliates and related entities (the "Company") entered into a Separation and Release Agreement with an Effective Date of August 8, 2016 ("Release Agreement"). After discussions with you, both parties executed letter agreements with the same subject matter, dated September 26, 2016, and October 4, 2016, that are replaced in their entirety by this letter agreement.  This letter agreement extends the termination date of your employment with the Company to October 17, 2016. Therefore, all references to September 30 in Section 2(a) of the Release Agreement shall be changed to October 17, 2016, as follows:



Mr. Lumsdaine shall remain employed by the Company until October 17, 2016. The Company will continue to provide the same pay and benefits as set forth in Paragraphs (A) and (D) of Section V of the Employment Agreement through October 17, 2016. As to the Bonus Plan described in Paragraph (B) of Section V of the Employment Agreement, Mr. Lumsdaine will be eligible to receive any bonus payments for performance towards individual objectives during the period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, and prorated bonus payments on Company's performance through October 17, 2016, which Bonus Plan will be determined after the end of the fiscal year for which the Bonus Plan was in place and paid in accordance with the terms of such Bonus Plan.  Neither the Company nor Mr. Lumsdaine will terminate Mr. Lumsdaine's employment prior to October 17, 2016 unless Mr. Lumsdaine engages in conduct constituting "Cause" as defined in the Employment Agreement. No provisions of the Employment Agreement shall survive following the termination of the Employment Agreement except as specifically described in this Section (2)(a).









Except as stated above, all other terms of the Release Agreement shall remain unchanged. Please sign this letter below to acknowledge your agreement to this amended provision. For avoidance of doubt, nothing in the Release Agreement, as amended by this letter, should be construed as prohibiting you from employment by Healthways SC, LLC while you remain employed by the Company. We appreciate your service to the Company.








Sincerely,







/s/ Mary Flipse




Mary Flipse


Chief Legal Officer


AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


 



	
/s/ Alfred Lumsdaine

	
 

	
October 10, 2016


	
Alfred Lumsdaine

	
 

	
Date
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,647-01

EX PARTE JOSHUA COBBS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2010-428,786-A IN THE 137 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM LUBBOCK COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault and sentenced to sixty years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Cobbs v. State, No. 07-11-00202-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo July 8, 2011). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that he could file a pro se petition for discretionary review. 

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court
2

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify

Applicant that he could file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommends

that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). 

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Seventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 07-11-0202-

CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 2010-428,786 from the 137 District Court of Lubbock th

County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of

the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: January 28, 2015

Do not publish
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2948 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2948

 To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fibers containing 
 84 percent or more by weight of vinyl chloride and 14 percent or more 
                      by weight of vinyl acetate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 1993

   Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself, and Mrs. Kennelly) (by 
   request) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fibers containing 
 84 percent or more by weight of vinyl chloride and 14 percent or more 
                      by weight of vinyl acetate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That subchapter II of 
chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.55.03  Synthetic staple fibers, not carded, combed or otherwise                    No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        processed for spinning (provided for in heading 5503):                                                        31/95           ''
                        Containing 84 percent or more by weight of vinyl                                                                               .
                        chloride and 14 percent or more by weight of vinyl                                                                              
                        acetate.................................................  Free                                                                  

    Sec. 2. The amendment made by the first section of this Act applies 
with respect to article entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000949373
<NAME>                        New World Coffee-Manhattan Bagel, Inc.

<S>                                            <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                         2,351
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,970
<PP&E>                                         6,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 43,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,422
<BONDS>                                        15,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   43,420
<SALES>                                        7,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,146
<CGS>                                          5,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                651
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            651
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   651
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .06



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6457

STEVEN MARTINEZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BRYAN M. ANTONELLI, Warden USP Hazelton; WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. 

Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:19-cv-00059-GMG)

Submitted: June 18, 2020 Decided: June 23, 2020

Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Martinez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Martinez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Martinez’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2018) petition in which he sought to challenge his convictions and sentence by way of the 

savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018). Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge 

his convictions and sentence in a traditional writ of habeas corpus under § 2241 if a § 2255 

motion would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. Here, the 

district court correctly determined that Martinez may not challenge the validity of his 

convictions and sentence through a § 2241 petition, as the conduct for which he was 

convicted remains criminal, In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000), and he failed 

to identify a retroactive change in the substantive law affecting his sentence, United States 

v. Wheeler, 886 F.3d 415, 429 (4th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Martinez v. Antonelli, No. 3:19-cv-00059-GMG (N.D.W. Va. 

Mar. 11, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Parking Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004 (the "Report"),
I, Monroe J. Carell, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                           /s/ MONROE J. CARELL, JR.
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Monroe J. Carell, Jr.
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

     A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS
BEEN PROVIDED TO CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CENTRAL
PARKING CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR
ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing. This certification is executed as of February 17, 2004.