alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013201EN.01000102.xml

| 13.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6951 — Bain Capital/FTE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 201/02

On 8 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6951. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6951. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2013314EN.01000301.xml

| 29.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6941 — PIPER/G+J/G+J RBA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 314/03

On 24 October 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6941. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6941. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
#### Dennis A. BAKER v. E. J. NUNN, Receiver in Bankruptcy.

No. 47217.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 1, 1973.

Barnett, Montgomery, McClintock & Cunningham; James W. Nobles, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

Lott, Sanders, Gwin & Franklin, Floyd M. Melton, Jr., Greenwood, for appellee.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and INZER, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Holmes County; E. G. Cortright, Chancellor.

Affirmed.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.62**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office								301-457-3691/301-457-3670 (fax)301-457-1037 (TDD)Annetta Smith/Denise Smith/Renee Spraggins301-457-2378

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2001

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Information On Nation's Group Quarters

The Commerce Department's Census Bureau today released Census 2000 data via the internet on the country's group quarters population by race and Hispanic origin.

The statistical tables divide the group quarters population into residents of institutionalized facilities and residents of noninstitutionalized facilities. The tables subdivide the population by sex and four age groups. The tables show these data for the total population and by the population who reported one race only for the following categories:
                            - White;
                            - Black or African American;
                            - American Indian and Alaska Native;
                            - Asian;
                            - Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; and
                            - Some other race.

Other tables show the corresponding data for those who reported only White, not of Hispanic or Latino origin; Hispanic or Latino origin (who may be of any race), as well as for those who reported two or more races.

  More extensive data on age structure and types of group quarters, along with data on other short-form questionnaire items, such as households, families, household relationship, housing occupancy and housing tenure (whether the householder owns or rents) will be released later this year.

To view the group quarters tables, go to <https://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/grpqtr.html>.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### Jeff LAWSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. Q-89.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 14, 1971.

Jeff Lawson, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus raising the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel by virtue of the joint representation of petitioner and his codefendants by the same attorney at trial is dismissed on authority of Gardner v. Wainwright, 433 F.2d 137 (5th Cir. 1970), and Belton v. *272State, Fla., 217 So.2d 97, cert. den. 395 U.S. 915, 89 S.Ct. 1764, 23 L.Ed.2d 229.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
#### Helen Scheuer, Plaintiff, *v.*Clemens Scheuer, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

October 30, 1953.

*969
      *Nathaniel H. Brower*for plaintiff.

*Milton Solomon*for defendant.

Conroy, J.

By this action, the plaintiff seeks to have a trust imposed upon a house, title to which is in the defendant, her husband. It is her contention that some time in June, 1938, at the request of the defendant, the plaintiff turned over to him the sum of $6,000, which she had borrowed from her parents in order to facilitate the purchase of the house in question. This was done”, she says, with the oral understanding that title would be taken in both their names. On or about October 4, 1938, the purchase was made, but title was taken in the name of the defendant. Shortly thereafter the plaintiff learned that her name did not appear on the deed, and that the property was solely in the name of the defendant. She claims to have made repeated demands that title to the property be changed to both their names, but that the defendant refused to do so. In 1951, after marital difficulties arose between the parties, this action was commenced. The defendant denies the contentions of the plaintiff and insists that the conversation claimed by her never occurred nor that she ever gave him any money toward the purchase.

The defendant claims the ten-year Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 53) to be a complete bar to this action. With this contention, the court is forced to agree. The language contained in *Geller*v. *Schulman*(110 N. Y. S. 2d 862, 865, affd. 115 N. Y. S. 2d 824) seems to be conclusive of the situation at issue here. There the court stated: ‘' It is well settled that where, as here, an action is instituted against a trustee ex maleficio or by implication, or construction of law, the statute begins to run from the time the wrong was committed by which the party became chargeable in equity as trustee. Lammer v. Stoddard, 103 N. Y. 672, 9 N. E. 328. In the case at bar, the breach of the alleged trust relationship occurred at the time of the purchase of the real property in such form as to create a tenancy by the entirety, namely, on October 30, 1933. It was then that the defendant committed the alleged wrong and the statute began to run from that very time.” In the instant case, the Statute of Limitations began to run on October 4, 1938, when the purchase was made, and expired ten years thereafter.

The complaint is dismissed. Submit judgment.
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449 www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

June 9, 2015

Stan Schwieger

LAW OFFICE OF STAN SCHWIEGER
P.O. Box 975 Waco, TX 76703

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Brodie Burks

Assistant County and District Attorney

200 W. State Street Groesbeck, TX 76642

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-14-00278-CR, 07-14-00279-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 13,184-A, 13,185-A

Style: Teddie Davenport v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

By Order of the Court, Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is this day overruled.

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable Patrick H. Simmons (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Carol Jenkins (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
# C_2013163EN.01000801.xml

| 8.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/8

---

Corrigendum to the prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6921 — IBM Italia/UBIS)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 142 of 22 May 2013
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 142 of 22 May 2013

2013/C 163/07

On page 7:

for:

| ‘1. | On 14 May 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking IBM Italia SpA (“IBM Italia”) of Italy belonging to the group International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the undertaking Unicredit Business Integrated Solutions S.c.p.a. (“UBIS”, Italy), belonging to UniCredit SpA (“Unicredit”) by way of purchase of shares.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘1.

On 14 May 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking IBM Italia SpA (“IBM Italia”) of Italy belonging to the group International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the undertaking Unicredit Business Integrated Solutions S.c.p.a. (“UBIS”, Italy), belonging to UniCredit SpA (“Unicredit”) by way of purchase of shares.’,

read:

| ‘1. | On 14 May 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking IBM Italia SpA (“IBM Italia”) of Italy belonging to the group International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of parts of the undertaking Unicredit Business Integrated Solutions S.c.p.a. (“UBIS”, Italy), belonging to UniCredit SpA (“Unicredit”) by way of purchase of shares.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘1.

On 14 May 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking IBM Italia SpA (“IBM Italia”) of Italy belonging to the group International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of parts of the undertaking Unicredit Business Integrated Solutions S.c.p.a. (“UBIS”, Italy), belonging to UniCredit SpA (“Unicredit”) by way of purchase of shares.’.

---
#### COUNTY OF DADE, State of Florida, Petitioner, v. Phillip Jerome CUNIO, Respondent.

No. 73-1228.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. *5,*1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7264

LARRY COCHRAN
,
Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.

WARDEN
, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv

- 00220

- JKB )

Submitted : November 18, 2021 Decided: November 22, 2021

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS
, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Larry Cochran , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Larry Cochran , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his conviction by way of
the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255

. Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge

his conviction in a traditional writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2 241 if a § 2255 motion
would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.
[Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a conviction when: (1) at the time of conviction, settled law of this circuit or the Sup reme Court established the legality of the conviction; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the substantive law changed such that the conduct of which the prisoner was convicted is deemed not to be criminal; and (3) the p risoner cannot satisfy the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255 because the new rule is not one of constitutional law.

In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328, 333

- 34 (4th Cir. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Therefore, we affirm the

dist rict court’s order . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 11012.

#### Powers, Trustee, et al. *v.*Moodey et al.

Decided December 14, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Lake county.

*Mr.*
      *531
      *Thomas O’Connor*and *Messrs. Kline, Tolies & Goff,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. George W. Alvord*and *Mr. F. J. Jerome,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers and Price, JJ., concur.
#### POOLE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

No. 39285.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 228 So.2d 639.
#### DICK BOND ASSOCIATES, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. OAKLAND CONSOLIDATED CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-440.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 14, 1971.

William E. Kreuter, of Lovett & Kreuter, Orlando, for appellant.

Maurice M. Paul, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the *764appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is, therefore, affirmed. See Salter v. Knowles, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 138; Shuler v. Allen, Fla.1955, 76 So.2d 879; Mellet v. Henry, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 69; and Good v. Douglas Gardens, Fla.1951, 50 So.2d 349.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and MAGER, JJ., concur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 for American Samoa and the 2010 Census for American Samoa

Reflects January 2012 data revision.

For more information visit www.census.gov.

Ta'u

Fitiuta

Ofu

Faleasao

Olosega

Swains Island

SWAINS ISLAND

MANU'A DISTRICT

ROSE ISLAND

Rose Island

AMERICAN SAMOA - 2010 Census Results

Percent Change in Population by County: 2000 to 2010

EASTERN AND WESTERN DISTRICTS

10.0 to 23.7

0.0 to 9.9

-25.0 to -0.1

-54.1 to -25.1

Percent Change

Percent Change for American Samoa: -3.1%

EASTERN DISTRICT District or Island (County Equivalent)

Ofu County (County Subdivision Equivalent)

Sua

Tualauta

Ituau

Lealataua

Leasina

Ma'oputasi

Tualatai

Sa'ole

Vaifanua (pt.)

EASTERN

DISTRICT

Vaifanua (pt.)

WESTERN

DISTRICT

0 2 mi 0 1 mi

0 2 mi

0 2 mi
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed March 27, 2014.

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 1 2

- 0 1678

- CR

CHARLES RICHARD VAND IVER , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial Distri ct Court Dallas Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 12

- 56764

- M



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, O’Neill, and Brown Opinion b y Justice O’Neill

A jury convicted Charles Richard Vandiver of assault involving family violence, found

one enhancement paragraph true, and assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment and a

$2,500 fine. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN

. § 22.01(a)(1), (b)(2)(A) (West 2011); T EX

. F AM

. C ODE

A NN

. § § 71.0021, 71.005 (West 2008 & Supp. 201 3 ). On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a

brief in whic h s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets

the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional

evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grou nds to advance. See- 2

- High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a

copy of the brief to appellant.

Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues After reviewing counsel’s brief,

appellant’s pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit.

See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s

duty in Anders cases). We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47

121678F.U05 /Michael J. O'Neill/
MICHAEL J. O’NEILL JUSTICE- 3

- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

CHARLES RICHARD VANDIVER, Appellant

No. 05

- 12

- 01678

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12

- 56764

- M). Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill, Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

Ba sed on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered March 27, 2014.

/Michael J. O'Neill/
MICHAEL J. O’NEILL JUSTICE
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Morocco
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# CA2013308EN.01000801.xml

| 23.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 308/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 308/8

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION

EPSO/AST/122/12

PROOFREADERS/LANGUAGE EDITORS (AST 3) WITH CROATIAN AS THEIR MAIN LANGUAGE (HR)

(2013/C 308 A/05)

| BARIC | Marija |
| --- | --- |
| BARISIC OHAREK | Ivana |
| BECKER | Lidia |
| BILIC | Ana |
| BOLJEVAC | Anita |
| DEPRATO | Stojan |
| ERAK | Nevena |
| FAJKOVIC | Amira |
| GREDELJ VARGOVIC | Ksenija |
| HADJUR | Jadranka |
| JAGUSIC | Ranka |
| KRAMARIC | Martina |
| MEIC | Branka |
| MIHAJLOVIC | Ivo |
| MIKULIC | Ivan |
| MILOS | Mladen |
| MRSA | Vedrana |
| PESORDA | Jelena |
| PETROVIC | Sanjin |
| RADMAN | Branka |
| RATKOVIC | Tanja |
| SARIRI | Sanja |
| ZAJEC | Morana |
| ZLICAR | Daniela |

BARIC

Marija

BARISIC OHAREK

Ivana

BECKER

Lidia

BILIC

Ana

BOLJEVAC

Anita

DEPRATO

Stojan

ERAK

Nevena

FAJKOVIC

Amira

GREDELJ VARGOVIC

Ksenija

HADJUR

Jadranka

JAGUSIC

Ranka

KRAMARIC

Martina

MEIC

Branka

MIHAJLOVIC

Ivo

MIKULIC

Ivan

MILOS

Mladen

MRSA

Vedrana

PESORDA

Jelena

PETROVIC

Sanjin

RADMAN

Branka

RATKOVIC

Tanja

SARIRI

Sanja

ZAJEC

Morana

ZLICAR

Daniela

The reserve list will be valid until 9 July 2016.

9 July 2016

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
# C_2011311EN.01000201.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/2

---

Election of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal

2011/C 311/02

On 6 October 2011, in accordance with Article 4(1) of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice and Article 6(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the Judges of the Civil Service Tribunal elected S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH as President, for the period from 7 October 2011 to 30 September 2014.

---