alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                         MEDICALOGIC/MEDSCAPE, INC.




COMMON STOCK

NUMBER

-----------------------------------


-----------------------------------
THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN
NEW YORK, NY OR RIDGEFIELD PARK, NJ



COMMON STOCK

SHARES

-----------------------------------


-----------------------------------
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS AND A
STATEMENT AS TO THE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES,
PRIVILEGES AND RESTRICTIONS ON SHARES


             INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

CUSIP 584642 10 2




THIS CERTIFIES THAT

SPECIMEN

IS THE OWNER OF


   FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE, OF
                         MEDICALOGIC/MEDSCAPE, INC.

transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer
Agent and registered by the Registrar.
  WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures
of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:


  David C. Moffenbeier
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
     AND SECRETARY


  Mark K. Leavitt, M.D.
       CHAIRMAN


SEAL


COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
     CHASEMELLON SHAREHOLDER SERVICES, LLC.
          TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

BY

                       AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
#### OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, Appellant, v. Brian D. STRALEAU, a minor, Canada Dry Bottling Company of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-742.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 15, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Joseph P. Metzger, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Income Opportunity Realty Investors,
Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald E. Kimbrough, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:   November 14, 2002                         /s/ Ronald E. Kimbrough
     ------------------------                -----------------------------------
                                             Ronald E. Kimbrough
                                             Executive Vice President
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial and
                                             Accounting Officer and
                                             Acting Principal Executive Officer)
#### Jack R. LUND, D. O., Appellant, v. EQUILEAS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of Eltra Corporation, a New York corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-669.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0536

IN THE MA1 1ER OF: 

# RLED APR 06 2021
Bovven Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana B.N., ORDER

A Youth in Need ofCare.

Counsel for the appellant mother of B.N. tiled a motion and brief asking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders v. Califirnia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The mother was granted time to file a response,but no response was filed. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in the mother's appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant mother personally. DATED this 4

c,—day ofApril,2021.
ChiefJustice/ 04/06/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0536

# 9e,
#### HESS OIL COMPANY, Appellant, v. Beverly GRIZZARD and his wife, Dora Lee Grizzard, Appellees.

No. 70-330.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 5, 1970.

Appeal disinissed.
#### George Robert WALDECK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-663.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 21, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT  11.1

CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE--DILUTED
FISCAL YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2003, FEBRUARY 2, 2002
AND FEBRUARY 1, 2001
                                   2002        2001         2000
                              ------------ ------------ ------------
Common shares outstanding
 at beginning of
 fiscal period                 18,201,743   17,885,645   17,791,450
Shares issued during
 the period-weighted average       76,709      194,809       36,813
Shares issuable under
 employee stock plans -
 weighted average                  31,823       38,154       38,775
Dilutive effect of exercise
 of certain stock options          14,500       60,150      175,039

Less: Treasury stock -
 weighted average             (10,238,303) (10,239,843)  (9,967,217)
                              ------------ ------------ ------------
Weighted average number
 of common and common
 equivalent shares              8,086,472    7,938,915    8,074,860
                              ============ ============ ============
Net earnings (loss)
 applicable to common shares:
  From continuing operations  $ 7,636,682  $ 7,022,337  $15,837,772
  Cumulative effect of change
   in accounting principle              -            -  (10,219,121)
  From discontinued operations (1,093,844)    (481,692)  (5,089,045)
                              ------------ ------------ ------------
      Net earnings            $ 6,539,838  $ 6,540,645  $   529,606
                              ============ ============ ============
Earnings (loss) per common
 share:
  From continuing operations  $      0.94  $      0.88  $      1.96
  Cumulative effect of change
   in accounting principle              -            -        (1.27)
  From discontinued
   operations                       (0.14)       (0.06)       (0.63)
                              ------------ ------------ ------------
     Net earnings             $      0.80  $      0.82  $      0.06
                              ============ ============ ============

Options to purchase 964,448, 1,006,620 and 689,412 shares of common
stock were outstanding during 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively, but
were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the
options' exercise price was greater than the average market price of
the common shares.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Manufacturing
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.67 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, OCT. 5, 2012 New "How Do We Know?" Infographic Focuses on Manufacturing Day Manufacturing plays a large role in our economy. To highlight this contribution, the Census Bureau has released an infographic focusing on manufacturing employment, cost of materials, value of shipments and exports. Part of the "How Do We Know" series, this infographic helps celebrate Manufacturing Day (Oct. 5) and highlights key Census Bureau data programs that track manufacturing. Tracking manufacturing has gotten easier than ever with the release of the Census Bureau's mobile app America's Economy, which helps users keep current on economic indicators from the Census Bureau and other agencies. The app can be downloaded for both iPhone and Android devices. How Do We Know? Infographics: <https://www.census.gov/how/index.html>
America's Economy: <https://www.census.gov/mobile/> **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2014015EN.01000101.xml

| 18.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/1

---

2014/C 15/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 9, 11.1.2014

OJ C 9, 11.1.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 377, 21.12.2013

OJ C 367, 14.12.2013

OJ C 359, 7.12.2013

OJ C 352, 30.11.2013

OJ C 344, 23.11.2013

OJ C 336, 16.11.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 10.3


 


November 7, 2016


 


Ian Blackley


c/o Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.

302 Knights Run Avenue #1200

Tampa, Florida 33602


 


Dear Ian:


 


This letter agreement (the “Letter
Agreement”) memorializes our conversations regarding your continued employment with Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) following the closing (the “Closing”) of the transactions contemplated by
the Separation and Distribution Agreement between the Company and International Seaways, Inc. (“INSW”), expected
to be entered into in connection with the separation of INSW from OSG on terms and conditions agreed to by INSW and OSG (such agreement,
the “Separation and Distribution Agreement”).


 


Following and conditioned upon the occurrence
of the Closing, you shall remain employed by the Company through December 29, 2016 (the “Transition Date” and
the period between the Closing and the Transition Date, the “Post-Spin Period”).


 


Upon the Transition Date, you will cease to
be employed by the Company or any of its affiliates, and you will be deemed to have resigned from any and all positions, titles,
duties, authorities and responsibilities at or with, the Company. Upon such Transition Date, assuming you remain employed by the
Company as of such date, your employment will terminate and you will be entitled to receive all payments and benefits for which
you are eligible (the “Termination Benefits”) upon a “Separation from Service due to termination by the
Company without Cause” under the Employment Agreement dated as of January 20, 2015 between you and the Company, as amended
on March 30, 2016 and August 3, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”), subject to the terms thereof. For all purposes,
this Letter Agreement constitutes and is in full satisfaction of any required notice from the Company.


 


For purposes of this Letter Agreement, during
the Post-Spin Period, you hereby agree that you shall not have nor shall you claim to have Good Reason to resign under the Good
Reason definition set forth in the Employment Agreement, any equity compensation award or any other agreement you may have with
the Company or its affiliates as a result of the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Separation and Distribution
Agreement or otherwise.


 




     


     


    

 


From the date hereof through the Post-Spin
Period, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement, as modified by this Letter Agreement, shall continue to apply to
you in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect. The terms of this Letter Agreement are conditioned upon the consummation
of the transactions contemplated by the Separation and Distribution Agreement and prior to the Closing, this Letter Agreement shall
have no force or effect.


 


	 	OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INC. 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Douglas D. Wheat	 
	 	 Douglas D. Wheat
	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	 
	 	Accepted and agreed: 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Ian Blackley	 
	 	Ian Blackley
Exhibit 32

 

FORM OF 906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

David G. Whalen, the Chief Executive Officer and Kevin F. Mahoney, the Chief Financial Officer of A.T. Cross Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0128

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

KURTTIS WARREN COPYAK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 14, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 9 2023

07/10/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0128
From: Chapman, Brooke (OST)

To: dalke@mt.gov; "jheaney@mt.gov"; info@townofwestyellowstone.com

Cc: Devany, Dennis (OST); brad.rawson@skywest.com

Subject: EAS Proposal Comment Period for WYS

Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:31:50 PM

Attachments: WYS_2013_EAS_Bid SkyWest.pdf

Everyone:

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at West Yellowstone and give you

an opportunity to submit any comments if you wish. As you know, by Order 2012-12-24, December

31, 2012, the Department solicited proposals from all interested air carriers to provide EAS at West

Yellowstone for a two-year term. In response to that order, we received a proposal from SkyWest

Airlines.

The proposal may be accessed online at http://www.regulations.gov by entering DOT-OST-2003-14626

in the “Enter Keyword or ID” section and I have attached a copy for your review.

Please note that the average passenger fares shown in the proposal do not necessarily reflect the

average local fare West Yellowstone passengers would actually pay. Also, the fare shown is net of

certain charges such as Federal transportation security fees, excise or ticket taxes, and Passenger

Facility Charges. Of course, carriers have the discretion to charge fares they deem appropriate, and the

passenger fares presented in this proposal have been developed for subsidy rate computation purposes

only.

You should also note that the schedules that the carrier has submitted are illustrative only, and that they

may make schedule changes to reflect changing conditions, e.g., to better meet shifting connecting

bank times at the hub. The Department expects subsidized air carriers to maintain well-timed and wellspaced flights in order to ensure full compensation.

We ask that you submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but in any case no later than

March 1. We will carefully consider your comments before we submit a recommendation to the

Assistant Secretary for a decision. Should you have any questions or need additional time to draft your

comments, please let us know.

Please send your comments via e-mail to EAS@dot.gov or Brooke.Chapman@dot.gov.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Brooke Chapman

Transportation Industry Analyst

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Room W86-307

202-366-0577
#### George KAPLAN, Appellant, v. COMPANIA PERUANA INTERNACIONAL DE AVIACION, S. A., a Peruvian company, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-328.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17022]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15616 and #15617; IOWA Disaster Number IA-00078]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of Iowa

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Iowa dated 07/30/2018.
    Incident: Tornado.
    Incident Period: 07/19/2018.

DATES: Issued on 07/30/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/28/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/30/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Marshall
Contiguous Counties:
    Iowa: Grundy, Hardin, Jasper, Poweshiek, Story, Tama

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere..................     3.875
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     1.938
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere..................     7.220
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     3.610
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere....     2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere.     2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      3.610
   Available Elsewhere........................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere.     2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15616 C 
and for economic injury is 15617 0.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Iowa.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

    Dated: July 30, 2018.
Linda E. McMahon,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-17022 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Order entered October 6 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00506
- CV STEVEN B. AUBREY, BE NEFICIARY OF THE AUB REY FAMILY TRUST CRE ATED UNDER THE WILL OF RI CHARD BUCK AUBREY, DECEASE D, Appellant
V. BETSY S. AUBREY, TRU STEE OF THE AUBREY F AMILY TRUST CREATED UNDER THE WILL OF RI CHARD BUCK AUBREY, D ECEASED, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 15
- 1 1685



### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s October 4, 2016, second unopposed motion for extension of time to file his amended brief. Appellant’s brief received by the Clerk of the Court on October 3, 2016, is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order. Appellee’s b rief shall be filed within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### Moses COCHRAN, Petitioner, v. MEDALLION PLASTERING CO., Inc., et al., Respondents.

No. 36952.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 21, 1968.

L. Barry Keyfetz, of Ser, Greenspahn, Keyfetz & Morrissey, Miami, for petitioner.

Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler & Pickle, Joseph V. Niemoeller, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Indus-tiral Commission bearing date October 26, 1967..

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
#### GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, etc., Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF DADE, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 40158.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 19, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 237 So.2d 839.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 15, 2016

NO. 03-15-00768-CV

Carolyn Barnes, Appellant

v.

Austin American Statesman; Austin Legal Blog; Zach Ryall; and KXAN-TV, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment and orders signed by the district court on November 4, 

2015. Having reviewed the record, it appears to the Court that appellant has not prosecuted her

appeal by failing to file a brief that complied with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

CONNECT WITH US**********

                          - Information Quality
                          - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                          - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                          - Accessibility
                          - FOIA
                          - Inspector General
                          - No FEAR Act
                          - U.S. Department of Commerce
                          - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?