alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 38738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16811]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 7, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 1, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 458 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-202, CP2018-
281.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-16811 Filed 8-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                            7022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   111066
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      84255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                222651
<PP&E>                                          398878
<DEPRECIATION>                                  138761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  563450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           135722
<BONDS>                                         240447
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9207
<OTHER-SE>                                      151607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    563450
<SALES>                                         574414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                574414
<CGS>                                           481410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   481410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               15045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22975
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              16765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (8588)
<NET-INCOME>                                      8177
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88
        

</TABLE>
# C_2013057EN.01000201.xml

| 27.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 February 2013

2013/C 57/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3077 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,20 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4589 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86330 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,4594 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2167 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4595 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,561 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 294,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6996 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1678 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3780 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3637 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2763 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3418 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1467 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5805 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6209 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 425,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5378 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1481 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5925 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 694,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0566 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,373 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0105 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,009 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5922 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7459 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,7400 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3077

JPY

Japanese yen

120,20

DKK

Danish krone

7,4589

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86330

SEK

Swedish krona

8,4594

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2167

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4595

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,561

HUF

Hungarian forint

294,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6996

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1678

RON

Romanian leu

4,3780

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3637

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2763

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3418

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1467

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5805

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6209

KRW

South Korean won

1 425,53

ZAR

South African rand

11,5378

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1481

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5925

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 694,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0566

PHP

Philippine peso

53,373

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0105

THB

Thai baht

39,009

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5922

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7459

INR

Indian rupee

70,7400

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                       102
<INVENTORY>                                        984
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,543
<PP&E>                                           5,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,979
<BONDS>                                            289<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        275
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,131
<SALES>                                          1,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,774
<CGS>                                              493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   327<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    316
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                221
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       221
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
<FN>
<F1>Does not include guarantee of ESOP debt of $190.
<F2>Only includes R&D expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Richard Foster, Appellant.

County Court, Columbia County,

December 23, 1952.

*508
      *John J. Curran*for appellant.

*John N. McLaren, District Attorney,*for respondent.

ComsroR, J.

On July 9, 1952, the defendant, while operating his automobile on a public highway in this county, entered a turn in the road and his steering wheel failed to negotiate the turn, with the result that he went to the opposite side of the road and was in a head-on collision with another vehicle. Thereafter, the defendant was charged with violation of subdivision 1 of section 15 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of the State of New York, which section provides that *“*Every motor vehicle operated or driven upon the public highways of this state shall be provided with * * * steering mechanism in good working order and sufficient to control such vehicle at all times when the same is in use ”.

No depositions were attached to the information, and the informant himself did not personally witness the events, nor was the information alleged to be upon information and belief. The defendant was not represented by counsel at the time that he was arraigned, but when the information was read to the defendant he objected to the inclusion therein of language to the effect that he did *knowingly*operate his vehicle with an inadequate steering mechanism. He further stated to the Justice that he did not know, and had no reason to know, that his steering wheel was defective. The Justice of the Peace accordingly struck from the printed language of the information the word “ knowingly ”, after which the defendant entered a plea of guilty.

While the statute does not specifically state that one must have knowledge of the defective condition of his steering apparatus, it is obvious that such was the legislative intent, for otherwise a person who had purchased a brand new automobile could be guilty of a violation of this statute the instant he drove it away from the garage upon the public highway.

To be guilty of a violation of this subdivision 1 of section 15 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, one must either know that his steering apparatus is in defective condition, or it must be such a defect that in the exercise of due care one should have discovered the defect. No case has been submitted to me that so *509holds, but other courts have held that this theory applies to the subdivision providing penalties for operating automobiles with defective brakes. The similarity is obvious.

I therefore conclude that when the word ‘ ‘ knowingly ’ ’ was stricken from the information, that the information became a nullity, and the judgment of conviction should be and is reversed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131969 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RONALD SWEATT, LYDIA SWEATT, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, and MOTOR CITY III, L.L.C., Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 131969 

 COA: 259272 

Oakland CC: 1999-016379-CK 

EDWARD GARDOCKI,

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

ROBERT KATZMAN,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
#### Johnny ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-943.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 21, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Willie REMBERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1380.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 1, 1978.

Willie Rembert, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HAYERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM

Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.

Affirmed.
# C_2012158EN.01000301.xml

| 5.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 June 2012

2012/C 158/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2437 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 97,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4304 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80845 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0070 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2009 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6030 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,733 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 303,06 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6970 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3990 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4730 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3024 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2796 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2923 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6515 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6430 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6011 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 468,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5957 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9149 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5560 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 730,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9802 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,046 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,8100 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,226 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5388 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7016 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,2310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2437

JPY

Japanese yen

97,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4304

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80845

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0070

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2009

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6030

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,733

HUF

Hungarian forint

303,06

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6970

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3990

RON

Romanian leu

4,4730

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3024

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2796

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2923

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6515

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6430

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6011

KRW

South Korean won

1 468,74

ZAR

South African rand

10,5957

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9149

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5560

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 730,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9802

PHP

Philippine peso

54,046

RUB

Russian rouble

41,8100

THB

Thai baht

39,226

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5388

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7016

INR

Indian rupee

69,2310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 10.35


 


FIRST AMENDMENT OF SALE-PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT OF SALE-PURCHASE
AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made effective as of August 19, 2016, by and between RPG GLENRIDGE
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Seller”), and CARROLL ACQUISITIONS, LLC, a Georgia
limited liability company (“Purchaser”), on the following terms and conditions:


 


RECITALS:


 


A.           Seller
and Purchaser entered into that Sale-Purchase Agreement dated August 12, 2016 (the “Agreement”; all capitalized
terms in this Amendment, unless otherwise defined herein, having the same meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement) for
the sale by Seller to Purchaser of property located in Fulton County, Georgia, as more particularly described therein; and


 


B.           Seller
and Purchaser desire to amend the Agreement as herein provided.


 


AMENDMENT:


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
for the premises considered, and for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller
and Purchaser amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1.          Due
Diligence Date. The term “Due Diligence Period” as set forth in Section 35 of the Agreement and
referred to elsewhere in the Agreement is hereby amended and shall hereafter be defined as the period beginning on the Effective
Date and ending on August 24, 2016, at 5:00 P.M. (New York time).


 


2.          Full
Force and Effect. As amended in this Amendment, the Agreement continues in full force and effect.


 


3.          Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of such counterparts
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT
BLANK.]


 




    	 	1	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the Effective Date.


 


	 	SELLER:
	 	 
	 	RPG GLENRIDGE LLC,
	 	a Delaware limited liability comp
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Michael Betancourt
	 	 Name:  Michael Betancourt 
	 	 Title:   Authorized Signatory


 


	 	PURCHASER:
	 	 
	 	CARROLL ACQUISITIONS, LLC,
	 	a Georgia limited liability company
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Josh Champion
	 	 Name: Josh Champion
	 	 Title: President


 




    	 	2
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-53457) pertaining to the 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan and
Employees Savings Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-57847)
pertaining to the Employees Supplemental Savings Plan of Crown Central Petroleum
Corporation and Subsidiaries of our report dated February 25, 1999, except for
Note C, as to which the date is March 29, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Crown Central Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.






                                                       /s/ - - ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 29, 1999


                                       47
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 69

                                                                   Exhibit 12


<TABLE>
           American General Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries

             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<CAPTION>
                                         Years Ended December 31,         
                               1996      1995      1994      1993      1992  
                                          (dollars in thousands)
<S>                         <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings:
  Income before provision
    for income taxes and 
    cumulative effect of
    accounting changes       $ 79,633  $125,640  $388,926  $327,103  $259,363
  Interest expense            482,343   506,618   411,875   368,986   378,679
  Implicit interest in rents   14,620    14,732    11,975    10,887     8,643

Total earnings               $576,596  $646,990  $812,776  $706,976  $646,685


Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense           $482,343  $506,618  $411,875  $368,986  $378,679
  Implicit interest in rents   14,620    14,732    11,975    10,887     8,643

Total fixed charges          $496,963  $521,350  $423,850  $379,873  $387,322


Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges                  1.16      1.24      1.92      1.86      1.67
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 180 

To delay the enforcement of any rulings of the National Labor Relations 

Board until there is a final resolution in pending lawsuits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2013 

Mr. BARRASSO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To delay the enforcement of any rulings of the National 

Labor Relations Board until there is a final resolution 

in pending lawsuits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘NLRB Freeze Act of 

5 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DELAY IN ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN RULES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, any determinations made by the National 

9 Labor Relations Board with respect to which unconstitu10 tional members were part of the Board’s quorum, shall 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 180 IS

1 not be given any force or effect until the date on which 

2 final judgment is entered in all cases challenging the con3 stitutionality of the appointment of members to such 

4 Board during a recess of the Senate that are pending be5 fore a Federal court on the date of enactment of this Act. 

6 (b) DEFINITION.—The term ‘‘unconstitutional mem7 ber’’ means a member of the National Labor Relations 

8 Board who was appointed during a recess of the Senate 

9 and who is the subject of a cause of action relating to 

10 such appointment that is pending before a Federal court 

11 on the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2013037EN.01003101.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/31

---

Special Report No 21/2012 ‘Cost-effectiveness of Cohesion Policy Investments in Energy Efficiency’

2013/C 37/08

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 21/2012 ‘Cost-effectiveness of Cohesion Policy Investments in Energy Efficiency’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
#### Louise E. HINES, Appellant, v. W. M. HINES, Appellee.

No. G-312.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Feb. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

See also, Fla.App., 184 So.2d 510.