alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1504 

To increase funds set aside for off-system bridges. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To increase funds set aside for off-system bridges. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRIDGES NOT ON FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS. 

4 Section 133(g)(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code, 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘15 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘25 

6 percent’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mandeep K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/Mandeep K. Taneja                 
|Mandeep K. Taneja                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|September 14, 2005
#### Pedro FLEITAS, Appellant, v. Richmond ROBINSON and Allstate Insurance Company, a corporation licensed to do business in the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 72-757.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1973.

*420Grover, Weinstein & Stauber and Arnold Lasky, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Talburt, Kubicki, Vogler & Carhart, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and LESTER, M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant appeals from a final judgment of the lower court entered upon a jury verdict awarding him $2,000 in damages.

As a result of an automobile accident, plaintiff sustained various injuries, including a permanent scarring of the lip. At the close of the trial, the judge informed the attorneys that the Florida Standard Jury Instructions would be read to the jury. No special instructions were requested by either counsel. In giving Florida Standard Jury Instruction 6.2(a), 31 F.S.A., to the jury, the court omitted the word “disfigurement” contained therein. The jury returned a $2,000 verdict for plaintiff. Thereafter, plaintiff’s attorney moved for a new trial as to the issue of damages. The motion was denied.

A search of the record below reveals that plaintiff’s attorney made no request for specific jury charges. In addition, he made no objection to instruction 6.2(a) as it was presented to the jury. Failure to timely object to a jury instruction precludes a party from assigning as error the giving of such instruction. See RCP 1.470(b), 30 F.S.A.

Accordingly, the judgment of the lower court must be and hereby is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Rex TOZER, Administrator of the Estate of Zene Tozer, Appellee.

No. 72-887.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1973.

Stephens, Magill, Thornton & Sevier, Miami, for appellant.

Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Fuller, Brumer, Moss & Cohen, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Jones v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp., 118 Fla. 648, 159 So. 804; Great American Insurance Company v. Cornwell, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 435.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6673** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. NATHANIEL JONES, a/k/a Devon Najee Hinton , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr - 00044

- REP

- 1 )

Submitted : August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Nathaniel Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bindi ng precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Jones appeals the district court’s order denying h is motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Jones is i neligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Jones , No. 3:06

- cr - 00044

- REP

- 1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2010)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ad equately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Jimmy Joseph LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-761.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Criminal Division, Brevard County; A. J. Hosemann. Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 39 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-138190) and Amendment No. 519 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 10, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Selective Service System

# AGENCY:

Selective Service System.

# ACTION:

Notice.

The following form has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for extension of clearance with change in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act:

## SSS Form 1

*Title:*                     The Selective Service System Registration Form.                

*Purpose:*                     Is used to register men and establish a data base for use in identifying manpower to the military services during a national emergency.                

*Respondents:*                     All 18-year-old males who are United States citizens and those male immigrants residing in the United States at the time of their 18th birthday are required to register with the Selective Service System.                

*Frequency:*                     Registration with the Selective Service System is a one-time occurrence.                

*Burden:*                     A burden of two minutes or less on the individual respondent.                

*Change:*                     Collecting telephone numbers from respondents.                

Copies of the above identified form can be obtained upon written request to the Selective Service System, Operations Directorate, 1515 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2425.

Written comments and recommendations for the proposed extension of clearance with change of the form should be sent within 30 days of the publication of this notice to the Selective Service System, Operations Directorate, 1515 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2425.

A copy of the comments should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer, Selective Service System, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 3235, Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: August 7, 2018.

Donald M. Benton,

Director.

[FR Doc. 2018-17625 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8015-01-P
# C_2013038EN.01000101.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

2013/C 38/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 32, 2.2.2013

OJ C 32, 2.2.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 26, 26.1.2013

OJ C 9, 12.1.2013

OJ C 399, 22.12.2012

OJ C 389, 15.12.2012

OJ C 379, 8.12.2012

OJ C 373, 1.12.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FARGO
ELECTRONICS, INC. CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000, AND CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (250)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,671
<PP&E>                                           7,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,766)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,026
<BONDS>                                         25,212
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,462
<SALES>                                         28,677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,677
<CGS>                                           16,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (60)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                       995
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    206<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,498
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
<FN>
<F1>WRITE OFF OF DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS-NET $110 OF INCOME TAX BENEFIT. THIS IS
APPROXIMATELY $.02 PER BASIC AND DILUTED SHARE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2013105EN.01000801.xml

| 11.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 April 2013

2013/C 105/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3086 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4563 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85480 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3353 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2183 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5060 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,865 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,11 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7007 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1160 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3890 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3370 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2429 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3290 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1587 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5300 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6200 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 480,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,6900 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1053 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6125 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 678,54 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9648 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,673 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,4050 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,976 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5968 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,8943 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,3510 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3086

JPY

Japanese yen

129,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4563

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85480

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3353

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2183

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5060

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,865

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,11

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7007

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1160

RON

Romanian leu

4,3890

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3370

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2429

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3290

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1587

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5300

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6200

KRW

South Korean won

1 480,61

ZAR

South African rand

11,6900

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1053

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6125

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 678,54

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9648

PHP

Philippine peso

53,673

RUB

Russian rouble

40,4050

THB

Thai baht

37,976

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5968

MXN

Mexican peso

15,8943

INR

Indian rupee

71,3510

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
250 La. 104

#### E. F. MINYARD v. CURTIS PRODUCTS, INC.

No. 48515.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 3, 1967.

In re: E. F. Minyard applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 192 So.2d 208.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff 'and defendant be notified.
# C_2013366EN.01000301.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6984 — EPH/Stredoslovenská Energetika)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2013/C 366/02)

On 20 November 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6984. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6984. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1681

AZADEH CHEGINI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HARBORVIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006

- 12; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Individually and as successor to: Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Home Loans, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P. ( “ Countrywide

- Bana ” ); SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; HARBORVIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006

- 12; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INCORPO RATED; DOES 1

- 100 , Defendants

– Appellees ,

a nd MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, ( “ MGIC ” ) , Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv - 00927

- TSE

- TCB )

Submitted : February 25, 2019 Decided: March 5, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.2 Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by un published per curiam opinion

. Azadeh Chegini , A ppellant Pro Se. William Dean Ledoux, Jr. , ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC , Richmond, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee , MCGUIREWOODS, LLP , Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER C URIAM: Azadeh Chegini seeks to appeal the district court’s order s dismissing her civil action arising out of her default on her home mortgage

. Before addressing the merits of Chegini’s appeal, we first must be assured that we have jurisdiction. Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015). We find that we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s November 2017 dismissal order becaus e Chegini designated only the district court’s May 2018 dismissal order in her notice of appeal, in contravention of Fed. R. Civ. P. 3(c)(1)(B), causing one D efendant to receive no notice of her appeal. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 176

- 77 (4th C ir. 2014). Accordingly, we dismiss Chegini’s appeal as to the November 2017 dismissal order. However, because the remaining D efendants received notice of Chegini’s appeal and have had an opportunity to brief all of the issues in this case, Chegini’s failure to designate the March 2018 dismissal order in her notice of appeal did not prejudice them

. T hus we may review this order in addition to the May 2018 dismissal order. See id

. Having reviewed the record , we find no reversible error. Ac cordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chegini v. Harborview Mortg

. Loan Tr

. , No. 1:17

- cv 00927

- TSE

- TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2018 & May 31, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequat ely presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED IN PART;

AFFIRMED IN PART
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 4.1


SEE LEGEND(S) ON REVERSE SIDE






	
			
	*CS-___*
	Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware
	*_____* Shares












SJW GROUP
COMMON STOCK






This certifies that ____________ is the record holder of _______________ (_____) shares of Common Stock of SJW Group transferable only on the books of said Corporation by the holder, in person, or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned.


A statement of all of the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon the respective classes or series of shares of stock of the Corporation and upon the holders thereof as established by the Certificate of Incorporation, and the number of shares constituting each series and designations thereof, may be obtained by any stockholder, upon request and without charge at the principal office of the corporation.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this ___ day of ______ , _____.




	
			
	Secretary
	 
	President




    



































	
					
	FOR VALUE RECEIVED I DO HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN, AND TRANSFER UNTO __________________________ SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE AND DO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT                                      AS ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE WITHIN NAMED CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES.










	
				
	DATED ___________, 20___
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	IN PRESENCE OF
	 
	 
	 

	 
	(Witness)
	 
	(Shareholder)

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	(Shareholder)








THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT AND NOT WITH A VIEW TO, OR IN CONNECTION WITH, THE SALE OR DISTRIBUTION THEREOF. NO TRANSFER MAY BE EFFECTED WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATED THERETO OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL IN A FORM REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED.
# C_2014350EN.01002201.xml

| 4.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 350/22

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2014/C 350/10)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain aluminium foil | Armenia | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 (OJ L 262, 6.10.2009, p. 1) | 7.10.2014 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain aluminium foil

Armenia

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 (OJ L 262, 6.10.2009, p. 1)

7.10.2014

---

(1)  OJ C 49, 21.2.2014, p. 7.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---