alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3155 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3155

 To repeal the increase in tax on social security benefits made by the 
                  Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1993

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the increase in tax on social security benefits made by the 
                  Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS.

    The Congress hereby finds the following:
            (1) The Social Security tax increase will immediately 
        affect over 5,000,000 beneficiaries nationwide.
            (2) By 1998, the number of recipients who will be burdened 
        by this tax hike will increase to 7,000,000.
            (3) The average tax increase during 1994 for those 
        beneficiaries affected will be $720.
            (4) While all families will see on average a 3.8 percent 
        increase in Federal taxes, the average senior family will be 
        forced to pay 7.5 percent more.
            (5) Unlike other age groups, senior families will see tax 
        increases at every level of income, including the poorest of 
        the elderly.
            (6) Senior citizens have historically been the target of 
        numerous measures, such as a freeze in their cost-of-living 
        adjustment and the implementation of the Social Security tax.
            (7) This tax hike, on top of the Social Security earnings 
        test, places an inordinate burden on seniors that is not 
        experienced by the rest of the American population.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TAX INCREASE ON SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    Section 13215 of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 is hereby 
repealed, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and 
administered as if such section (and the amendments made thereby) had 
not been enacted.

                                 <all>
```
Order entered March 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01592-CV

LAVANTIA HAMILTON, Appellant

V.

MARY LEE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD-11-00436-X

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated December 23, 2014, we 

notified the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue. We directed the 

district clerk to file the clerk’s record within thirty days. To date, the clerk’s record has not been 

filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of 

the date of this order, either the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant has not been 

found indigent and has not paid for the record. We NOTIFY appellant that if we receive 

verification she is not indigent and has not paid for the record, we will, without further notice, 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order by electronic 

transmission to Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk and to all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Anthony J. Merante, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Brooklyn Cheesecake &
Desserts Company, Inc;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly report,  fairly presents in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e) for the
issuer and I have:

            a) designed such  disclosure  controls and procedures to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's  disclosure  controls
and procedures;  and presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation:

            c)  disclosed  in this report any changes in the  issuer's  internal
controls over financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent  fiscal  quarter ( the issuer's  fourth  quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect the issuer's internal controls or financial reporting: and

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit  committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

            a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of
internal  controls which could adversely  affect the issuer's ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

            b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls.


Date: December 6, 2006


/s/ Anthony J. Merante
------------------------------------
Anthony J. Merante
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012389EN.01000101.xml

| 15.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/1

---

2012/C 389/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 379, 8.12.2012

OJ C 379, 8.12.2012

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 373, 1.12.2012

OJ C 366, 24.11.2012

OJ C 355, 17.11.2012

OJ C 343, 10.11.2012

OJ C 331, 27.10.2012

OJ C 319, 20.10.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/03/2010 01:10 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |"Bromberg, Kevin L." <kevin.bromberg@sba.gov> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |08/03/2010 12:59 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Description of MACT Floor for Proposal - See language on 4SRB and 4SLB | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------|

(See attached file: 0006_Memo to EPA_less than 500 hp Subcats and Floor.pdf)
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 297

To permit States in certain cases to waive application of the requirements

of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 with respect to

a vehicle which is being operated for the purpose of removing snow

or ice from a roadway by plowing, sanding, or salting.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. PETRI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To permit States in certain cases to waive application of

the requirements of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety

Act of 1986 with respect to a vehicle which is being

operated for the purpose of removing snow or ice from

a roadway by plowing, sanding, or salting.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHI4 CLE REQUIREMENTS TO VEHICLES USED FOR

5 SNOW OR ICE REMOVAL.

6 (a) STATE WAIVER AUTHORITY.—Subject to sub7 section (b), a State may waive application of the require-
2

•HR 297 IH

1 ments of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of

2 1986 (49 U.S.C. 2701 note) with respect to a vehicle

3 which is being operated within the boundaries of an eligi4 ble unit of local government by an employee of such unit

5 for the purpose of removing snow or ice from a roadway

6 by plowing, sanding, or salting.

7 (b) LIMITATION.—The waiver authority contained in

8 subsection (a) shall only apply in a case in which the em9 ployee described in subsection (a) is needed to operate the

10 vehicle because the employee of the eligible unit of local

11 government who ordinarily operates the vehicle and has

12 a commercial driver’s license is temporarily unavailable or

13 is in need of additional assistance due to a snow emer14 gency.

15 (c) ELIGIBLE UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT DE16 FINED.—For the purposes of this section, the term ‘‘eligi17 ble unit of local government’’ means a city, town, borough,

18 county, parish, district, or other public body created by

19 or pursuant to State law which has a total population of

20 3,000 individuals or less.

Æ
#### KIRKLEY v. HAINES.

No. 39151.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 312.
cbli093016ex101







[***]= CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 160 (Friday, August 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 41102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]


Indian Gaming; Approval of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact 
Amendments in the State of Oklahoma

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Oklahoma entered into compact amendments with the 
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and with the Fort Sill Apache Tribe of 
Oklahoma governing certain forms of class III gaming; this notice 
announces the approval of the State of Oklahoma Gaming Compact Non-
house-Banked Table Games Supplement between the State of Oklahoma and 
the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and the Fort Sill Apache Tribe of 
Oklahoma.

DATES: The compact amendments take effect on August 17, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by IGRA and 25 CFR 
293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval 
by the Secretary. The compact amendments authorize the Tribes to engage 
in certain additional class III gaming activities, provide for the 
application of existing revenue sharing agreements to the additional 
forms of class III gaming, and designate how the State will distribute 
revenue sharing funds.

    Dated: August 6, 2018.
Tara Sweeney,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018-17728 Filed 8-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
# C_2014013EN.01000201.xml

| 17.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6927 — Goldman Sachs/TPG Lundy/Barclays/Intertain)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 13/03

On 9 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M6927. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M6927. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc.: Exhibit 10.48 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.48 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT 

Amendment No. 2 dated November 16, 2016 (this “Amendment”) to
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2016 and as amended on November
3, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and between Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the “Company”) and N2 Partners Ltd., a Bahamian
corporation (“Purchaser”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Purchaser desire to further amend the
Agreement to change the date of closing. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and
agreements set forth herein, the Company and Purchaser hereby agree as follows:


1.         
Change of Date of Closing. Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended
to provide that the date of Closing (as defined in the Agreement) shall occur on
the earlier of (i) a date to be specified by the Company in writing to Purchaser
which date shall be no earlier than January 23, 2017, and no later than February
28, 2017; provided however, that such date must be at least five business days
after such notice is delivered; and (ii) a date to be specified by the Purchaser
in writing to the Company which date shall be no earlier than January 23, 2017,
and no later than February 28, 2017; provided however, that such date must be at
least five business days after such notice is delivered.

2.          No
Further Changes. Except as amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain unchanged 

3.         
Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 

4.         
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be
an original and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same
agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this
Amendment on the date first written above. 

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

By: /s/ Serge C.P. Belamant 
Serge C.P. Belamant 
Chief
Executive Officer 

N2 PARTNERS LTD. 

By: /s/ WND Limited 
WND Limited 
Director
#### James Lewis BURNS, a/k/a James Lewis Burns, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43469.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 29, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 272 So.2d 874.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Anthony J. Bettencourt, Chief Executive Officer of Verity,
Inc. (the Company), and Steven R. Springsteel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:



1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2005, and to which this Certification
is attached as Exhibit 32, (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 8th day of April, 2005.



/s/ ANTHONY J. BETTENCOURTAnthony J. BettencourtChief Executive Officer and President/s/ STEVEN R. SPRINGSTEELSteven R. SpringsteelSenior Vice President of Finance and Administration and
Chief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Verity, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### Beverly Ann RINESMITH and Ray W. Bolt, co-executors of the estate of Ray Harold Bolt, Sr., deceased, Petitioners, v. Royce D. JOHNSON, Ida Korff Johnson, his wife, and Harry Korff, III, a minor, by his next friend and mother, Ida Korff Johnson, Respondents.

No. 40229.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 19, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 238 So.2d 659.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cani I. Shuman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cani I. Shuman     
|Cani I. Shuman         
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 15, 2005
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2



                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         DYNAMIC HEALTH PRODUCTS, INC.


Pursuant to the provisions of section 607.1006, Florida Statutes, this
corporation adopts the following articles of amendment to its Articles of
Incorporation:

FIRST:    The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be amended by
striking Article One in its entirety and replacing therefor:

                               "Article I - Name

          The name of this Corporation is Innovative Health Products, Inc."

SECOND:   The date of the amendment's adoption: July 22, 1998.

THIRD:    The amendment was approved by the director and sole shareholder of
the corporation.

     Signed this 22nd day of July, 1998.



                                             /s/ Kotha Sekharam
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Kotha Sekharam, President
250 La. 100

#### Anatole J. ZERINGUE et al. v. J. Louis BLOUIN et al.

No. 48533.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 3, 1967.

In re: Anatole J. Zeringue et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Lafourche. 192 So.2d 838.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
#### Martin James LUTHER, Appellant, v. PERSHING AUTO LEASING, INC., and Gus Samuel Jacobson, Appellees.

No. 72-79.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 26, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.