alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 51039 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Lana K. Crown,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:19

- cr

- 126

- 5

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson** , Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Lana K. Crown pleaded guilty to a drug crime. She timely appealed. Her attorney moved to withdraw under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See also United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Our court denied that motion, holding the cas e involved one nonfrivolous issue:

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not prec edent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 28, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-51039 Document: 00516256277 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2022No. 20

- 51039

2 “whether the conditions of supervised release identified in the written judgment as ‘Mandatory Conditions’ and ‘Standard Conditions’ constitute discretionary conditions that the district court did not orally pronounce at sentencing.” United States v. Crown , No. 20

- 51039 (July 23, 2021) (citing United States v. Diggles , 957 F.3d 551, 556

– 63 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc)). The parties have now briefed that issue.
In the interim, our court has determined that failing to pronounce
standard conditions that are contained in a district’s standing order is not

error. See United States v. Martinez , 15 F.4th 1179, 1180

– 81 (5th Cir. 2021). Crown contests four conditions, but she does not contest that each of those
conditions is contained in a Western District of Texas standing order.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-51039 Document: 00516256277 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
# C_2013266EN.01000101.xml

| 17.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 September 2013

2013/C 266/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3357 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4566 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83850 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6943 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2374 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8920 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,769 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,78 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7025 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1944 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4588 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6592 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4248 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3759 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3570 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6267 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6824 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 444,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0230 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1748 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5955 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 855,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3945 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,090 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,0625 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,342 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0086 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2205 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,9450 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3357

JPY

Japanese yen

132,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4566

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83850

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6943

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2374

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8920

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,769

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,78

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7025

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1944

RON

Romanian leu

4,4588

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6592

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4248

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3759

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3570

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6267

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6824

KRW

South Korean won

1 444,54

ZAR

South African rand

13,0230

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1748

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5955

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 855,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3945

PHP

Philippine peso

58,090

RUB

Russian rouble

43,0625

THB

Thai baht

42,342

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0086

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2205

INR

Indian rupee

83,9450

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 12.1

DEL LABORATORIES, INC.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               SUCCESSOR                                      PREDECESSOR
                                      ----------------------------    ----------------------------------------------------------
                                       JANUARY 1,     FEBRUARY 1,      JANUARY 1,
                                         2006 -          2005 -          2005 -
                                      DECEMBER 31,    DECEMBER 31,     JANUARY 31,               YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------------------------------------
                                          2006            2005            2005            2004           2003           2002
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------   ------------   ------------
                                                       RESTATED(1)                     RESTATED(1)    RESTATED(1)    RESTATED(1)

                                                                         (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                   <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
Pretax income                         $    (30,150)   $    (31,203)   $    (22,457)   $     24,837   $     31,050   $     24,011
Fixed charges (as calculated below)         39,520          29,727             426           5,745          6,025          6,381
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------   ------------   ------------

Earnings                              $      9,370    $     (1,476)   $    (22,031)   $     30,582   $     37,075   $     30,392
                                      ============    ============    ============    ============   ============   ============

FIXED CHARGES
Interest expense, net                 $     37,132    $     27,661    $        264    $      3,584   $      4,185   $      4,663
Rent expense interest factor                 2,388           2,066             162           2,161          1,840          1,718
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------   ------------   ------------

Total fixed charges                   $     39,520    $     29,727    $        426    $      5,745   $      6,025   $      6,381
                                      ============    ============    ============    ============   ============   ============

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES              --              --              --            5.3x           6.2x           4.8x
                                      ============    ============    ============    ============   ============   ============

Deficiency                            $     30,150    $     31,203    $     22,457
</TABLE>

(1) See Note 3 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information related to the restatements.
Date: ~ j, o} ..(o t'-l o.t tfp{Y) 

Meeting: {YJ e~ ur~. /v'l Arz.JUl h n -L.- 01vusf.e.e- E olu..~ ~ 

Rule(s) Discussed: T-e..t'Ylft;Yt-.e..-

Written Materials? ~ 

Name Organization Phone N umber 

b ~V~IJ c) 1"" ~\1"\{)U.I\C..,. &~"'>~"' D[- Ar.,<..-"ti\,." 

Jo~r Mol~" I l 

\S U\ C {. )"'"' >~+c Vtp~ _ 

I 

I 

I 

I
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.7

                                    SECOND AMENDMENT
                                TO OFFICER SEVERANCE PLAN


              THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is effective as of July 14, 2000 (the
"Effective Date"). In accordance with the terms of Section 9(g) of the Officer
Severance and pursuant to the action of the Board of Directors of Day Runner,
Inc., on July 12, 2000, the Officer Severance Plan is hereby amended as
follows:

1. Section 2(f) is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

       "EMPLOYMENT PERIOD" means the aggregate period of time during which an
       individual has been employed as a duly elected or appointed officer
       (other than solely as Chairman of the Board, Secretary and/or Assistant
       Secretary) by the Company prior to the Termination Date.

2. Section 3(b)(iii) is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

       The result of such officer having submitted to the Company his or her
       written resignation (even if such indicates that such resignation is
       "voluntary") upon and in accordance with (A) the request of the Board in
       writing or pursuant to a duly adopted resolution of the Board or (B) with
       respect to an Eligible Officer other than the Chief Executive Officer of
       the Company, the written request of the Chief Executive Officer;

3. Section 4(b) is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

       SEVERANCE BONUS. The amount of severance bonus shall be based on the
       highest office of the Company attained by the Eligible Officer at or
       prior to the Termination Date and shall be determined in accordance
       with the following schedule:

                                             HIGHEST OFFICE ATTAINED
                                             -----------------------

                                  Asst. VP/VP    SVP/EVP/COO      PRES/CEO

Number of months of severance      3 months       4 months        5 months


4. The Officer Severance Plan, except as expressly amended by this Amendment,
shall continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Second Amendment to the
Officer Severance Plan as of the date first written above.

                                               DAY RUNNER, INC.


                                               /s/
                                               -------------------------------
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned Director of PHOENIX FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC. does hereby constitute
and appoint James Riedman, Russell Hall and Dennis Nelson, and each or any of them, the undersigneds true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with power of substitution, for the undersigned and in the undersigneds name, place and
stead, to execute the Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009, including any and all exhibits, schedules, supplements, certifications and supporting documents thereto, for the
undersigned us as Director, to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection therewith.



|                                         |  |                      
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                                         | 
|/S/    FREDRICK
PORT Fredrick Port       |  | Dated: April 16, 2009
|                                         | 
|/s/    STEVEN
DEPERRIOR Steven DePerrior |  | Dated: April 15, 2009
|                                         | 
|/s/    GREGORY
HARDEN Gregory Harden     |  | Dated: April 16, 2009
|                                         | 
|/s/    JAMES R.
RIEDMAN James R. Riedman |  | Dated: April 16, 2009
|                                         | 
|/s/    WILHELM
PFANDER Wilhelm Pfander   |  | Dated: April 16, 2009
|                                         | 
|/s/    JOHN
KRATZER John Kratzer         |  | Dated: April 16, 2009
|                                         | 
|                                         |  |
II 

Calendar No. 455 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2057 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

198 Baker Street in Corning, New York, as the ‘‘Specialist Ryan P. 

Jayne Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2014 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JULY 9, 2014 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 198 Baker Street in Corning, New York, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Ryan P. Jayne Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST RYAN P. JAYNE POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 198 Baker Street in Corning, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2057 RS

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Spe2 cialist Ryan P. Jayne Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Ryan P. 

7 Jayne Post Office Building’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 455 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2057 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostJayne Post Office Building’’. ning, New York, as the ‘‘Specialist Ryan P. al Service located at 198 Baker Street in CorJULY 9, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2999

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the requirement that

a chronic disease becoming manifest in a veteran within one year of

the veteran’s discharge from military service must be at least 10 percent

disabling in order to be presumed to be service-connected for purposes

of veterans’ benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. SLATTERY (by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the requirement that a chronic disease becoming manifest in a

veteran within one year of the veteran’s discharge from

military service must be at least 10 percent disabling

in order to be presumed to be service-connected for purposes of veterans’ benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 1112 of title 38, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking out ‘‘to a degree of 10 percent or

5 more’’ each place it appears.
2

•HR 2999 IH

1 (b) The amendments made by subsection (a) shall

2 take effect on October 1, 1993.

Æ
Notice of Receipt of a Clean Air Act Waiver Application to Increase the Allowable Ethanol Content of 

Gasoline to 15 Percent

Date EPA Attendees Name of Organization Summary of Discussion Written 

Comments 

Provided?

Did they also 

submit to 

Docket?

Date sent to EPA

11/02/2009 Gina McCarthy

Mccarthy.gina@epa.gov

Lawrence Elworth

Elworth.Lawrence@epa.gov

In Person:

Representatives from 

Growth Energy met with 

Gina McCarthy and 

Lawrence Elworth. 

Attendees included Tom 

Buis and Rob Skjonsberg.

Growth Energy discussed their E15 waiver 

application and comments. Additionally, 

Growth Energy inquired about the upcoming 

Renewable Fuels Standard final rulemaking.

No. Growth 

Energy

submitted 

comments to 

the docket.

7/21/2009
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

GASTON, HOUTZ, and ATTANASIO

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Juan CORREA

Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202000185

Decided: 30 March 2021

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

K. Scott Woodard

Sentence adjudged 14 April 2020 by a general court-martial convened 

at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a 

military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment:

reduction to E-1, confinement for 30 months, a fine of $3,000.00, and a 

dishonorable discharge.

For Appellant: 

Captain Thomas P. Belsky, JAGC, USN

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.
United States v. Correa, NMCCA No. 202000185

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. 

§§ 859, 866.

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
# C_2011319EN.01000101.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/1

---

2011/C 319/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 311, 22.10.2011

OJ C 311, 22.10.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 305, 15.10.2011

OJ C 298, 8.10.2011

OJ C 290, 1.10.2011

OJ C 282, 24.9.2011

OJ C 269, 10.9.2011

OJ C 252, 27.8.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            3209
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       87
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3744
<PP&E>                                            1759
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1088
<BONDS>                                            188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13278
<OTHER-SE>                                      (9460)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5094
<SALES>                                            406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   406
<CGS>                                              630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (71)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1434)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALANAH F.F. PETERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 101 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all 

remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in rejecting, under a constructive possession 

theory, Petitioner’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support her 

conviction for carrying a firearm without a license?
#### Leland Herman PLYMALE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-740.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 4, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Leland Herman Plymale, in pro se.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen, Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr, Asst. Atty. Gen, Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Kelly v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 901; Aiuppa v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 615; and Stewart v. State, Fla.App.1959, 221 So.2d 155.

PIERCE, C. J, and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ, concur.
256 La. 889

#### Moelie L. BREAUX v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY.

No. 50890.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1970.

In re: Moelie L. Breaux applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 238 So.2d 274.

Not considered. The application was filed too late. See Art. 7, Sect. 11, La. Const.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,902
<SECURITIES>                                         8
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,279
<INVENTORY>                                     76,380
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               152,438
<PP&E>                                         279,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 378,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,174
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   378,801
<SALES>                                         94,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,237
<CGS>                                           78,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,997
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,522
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,475
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>