alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Ivonne Cunarro

### Chief Knowledge Officer

Ivonne Cunarro is the Chief Knowledge Officer for the U.S. Department of Commerce's Minority Business Development Agency.  She is responsible for developing MBDA's research and knowledge management programs. Under her leadership, MBDA has produced two reports in-house entitled, “The State of Minority Business Enterprises” and “Characteristics of Minority Businesses and Entrepreneurs.” She has also spearheaded the production of five other papers on issues of importance to minority business enterprises including: “Disparities in Capital Access between Minority and non-Minority Businesses,” “Increasing MBE Competitiveness through Strategic Alliances,” “MBEs: Mastering the Supply Chain” and “The Sophisticated Innovator: Practical Insights from Provocative Stories of Innovation in Minority Business Enterprises."

Prior to the Chief Knowledge Officer position, she served as Executive Director and CEO of the National Association of Hispanic Publications (NAHP), where she directed all efforts including, fundraising, congressional affairs, coalition building and convention management.  Cunarro worked on Capitol Hill as Director of Communications for Congressman José E. Serrano for over four years.  In addition, she served as Deputy Director of Communications for the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, and as Director of Communications for the Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility. She has served as a board member of NAHP, the Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility, and the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda. Cunarro holds a Master of Arts in Broadcast Journalism and a Bachelor of Science in Marketing, both from the University of Maryland.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
# C_2012304EN.01000402.xml

| 9.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6599 — Comsa Rail Transport/Naviland Cargo/Grupo Logistico SESE/Target)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 304/05

On 3 October 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6599. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6599. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2013313EN.01000503.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/5

---

Designation of the Judge replacing the President as the Judge hearing applications for interim measures

2013/C 313/10

On 23 September 2013, the General Court decided, in accordance with Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure, to designate Judge Forwood to replace the President of the General Court for the purpose of deciding applications for interim measures where the latter is absent or prevented from dealing with them, for the period from 23 September 2013 to 31 August 2016.

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 15, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 9, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 460 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-204, CP2018-
284.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-17500 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company")
   on Form 10K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
   Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Dan
   K. Wassong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
   Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
   Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company






/S/ DAN K. WASSONG
--------------------------
Dan K. Wassong
Chief Executive Officer
March 12, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4413000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9890000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    167000
<INVENTORY>                                    2446000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              21533000
<PP&E>                                        23910000
<DEPRECIATION>                                17035000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                31830000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         17088000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        341000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     7215000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  31830000
<SALES>                                       53265000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              53265000
<CGS>                                         43933000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 51719000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1101000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 493000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             493000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0      
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    493000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        


</TABLE>
Sierra Club/NPCA, TCEQ and Luminant Meetings in October 2015:

TCEQ: 

Attendees: Terry Salem, Steve Hagle, John Minter and others. RG6 – Joe Kordzi, Mark Hansen, Guy 

Donaldson, Lynde Schoellkopf. Carrie Thomas, Josh Olzsweski, Lea Anderson, Kristi Smith, Michael Ling 

and others. On 10-14-15 TCEQ and EPA Region 6, OGC and OAQPS met via teleconference to discuss 

implications of the DC Circuit’s remand of the CSAPR decision. The Region explained to TCEQ that we 

may not be able to take full final action on the Texas Regional SIP due to the court’s remand of the TX 

CSAPR budgets. Discussion over TCEQ’s ability to adopt CSAPR budgets to satisfy the Better Than BART 

requirements for RH. TCEQ explained process to adopt any budgets would likely require a major 

environmental rulemaking that has only been done once before. Further discussion on what would be 

most efficient and judicious action to address the remand by either TCEQ or EPA. EPA committed to get 

back to TCEQ on specific implication of the court remand and reliance on remanded budgets. 

Luminant: 

On 10-14-15, Luminant met with EPA Headquarters – Debbi Jordan, Phil Lorang. Attendees – Stephanie 

Moore and Stephen Gidiere and others. EPA Region 6 joined by telephone, although it was difficult to 

hear the parties speaking at headquarters. Luminant presented a powerpoint similar to what was 

presented to Region 6 in July 2015. They walked through several points over recent air quality data, 

CENRAP modeling, and a recent Kansas notice approving a 5-year progress report. Luminant asked 

whether or not EPA would consider a type of proposal that involved scrubber upgrades and not retrofits, 

as well as adjustment of emissions rates. Luminant submitted a supplemental comment letter. We 

committed to getting back to Luminant in a week from the meeting. 

NPCA, et al: 

On 10-02-15, EPA headquarters and Region 6 held a conference call with NPCA, Earth Justice and Sierra 

Club to discuss implications of the recent remand of the CSAPR budgets and how EPA believes it affects 

a final, full action of the Texas regional haze SIP. Issues presented concerned taking a taking a full, final 

action as proposed, taking no action on pieces that could be implicated by the CSAPR remanded 

budgets, seeking an extension of the TX Regional Haze action. EPA committed to getting back to the 

groups as soon as possible once EPA internally discussed timing issues and potential timelines for an 

extension. We have scheduled a follow-up for October 28, 2015.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17501]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 15, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 9, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 461 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-205, CP2018-
285.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-17501 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Janet Irene FUCHS, Appellant, v. James Aaron FUCHS, Appellee.

No. HH-83.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 7, 1978.

John Paul Howard, Jacksonville, for appellant.

John E. Hankal, St. Augustine, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs and arguments of counsel, we conclude the lower court erred in awarding to the husband a special equity in certain property jointly owned by the parties during the marriage. The husband neither pleaded nor presented substantial competent evidence of his entitlement for such award. *Suhor v. Suhor,*341 So.2d 277 (Fla.1st DCA 1977). The judgment is otherwise affirmed.

REVERSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A2112. ROSA MINER v. WILLIE LATIMORE.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, defendant Rosa Miner appealed to the superior court, which also

ruled in favor of the plaintiff. Miner then filed this direct appeal. We lack

jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, “appeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of

lower courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for

discretionary appeal.” (Punctuation omitted.) Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874,

875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Because Miner did not

follow the proper procedure for requesting appellate review in this case, we lack

jurisdiction over this appeal.

Second, this appeal is untimely. Although a notice of appeal generally may be

filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed, appeals from

judgments in dispossessory actions must be filed within 7 days of the date the

judgment was entered. See OCGA § 44-7-56; Radio Sandy Springs, Inc. v. Allen

Road Joint Venture, 311 Ga. App. 334, 335-336 (715 SE2d 752) (2011). Miner,

however, filed the notice of appeal in this case 21 days after the superior court’s order

was entered. For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

July 21, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/21/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      69,668,890
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            50,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                462,081,710
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     890,541,133
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       897,903,949
<LOANS>                                     78,329,537
<ALLOWANCE>                                    100,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,600,159,038
<DEPOSITS>                                 800,652,692
<SHORT-TERM>                               682,405,433
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         14,880,468
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       24,168,180
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,851
<OTHER-SE>                                  77,987,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,600,159,038
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                668,706
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           20,311,580
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            20,980,286
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,651,354
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,856,161
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,124,125
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             200,427
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             22,774,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,623,388
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,623,388
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,208,169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.08
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               100,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              100,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        100,000
        

</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**655 CA 14-02110**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

PRISCILLA MORRIS, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCIS LEE MORRIS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

ROCHESTER-GENESEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, LIFT LINE, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (GRETA K. KOLCON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., ROCHESTER (K. JOHN WRIGHT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered April 7, 2014. The order, among other things, denied in part the motion of defendants Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority and Lift Line, Inc., to dismiss certain causes of action.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on April 26 and 28, 2015,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131969 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. RONALD SWEATT, LYDIA SWEATT, Stephen J. Markman, and MOTOR CITY III, L.L.C., Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 131969 COA: 259272 Oakland CC: 1999-016379-CK EDWARD GARDOCKI, Defendant-Appellee,

and

ROBERT KATZMAN, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, Thomas W. Fife,
hereby constitutes and appoints William H. Parsons his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and
all capacities, to sign the Form 10-KSB of Data Dimensions, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996, and any amendments or
supplements thereto, and to file this Power of Attorney and the Form 10-KSB,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq National Market System,
granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and
perform each and every each and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and
agent, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         Dated this 25th day of March, 1997.



Signature:



/s/  THOMAS W. FIFE
-----------------------
Thomas W. Fife