# Line 106

NAIMA/U.S. EPA

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:



# Johns Manville International

**Winder Plant**

**713 Bankhead Hwy**

**Winder, GA 30680-3428**

**BTEC Project No. 10-3990.09**

**January 13, 2011**

**BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.**

**2615 Wolcott Street**

**Ferndale, Michigan 48220**

**(248) 548-8070**

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.09

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 13, 2011 

## i Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate formaldehyde,

methanol, and phenol emission rates from four exhau st stacks (641E, 642E, 653E, 654E)

associated with Line 106 located at the Johns Manvi lle International (Johns Manville) Plant in

Winder, Georgia.

Reference test methods used and test program method ologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Table I summarizes the overall results of the

emissions test program.

Table I

Overall Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Stack Pollutant Emission

Rate

(lbs/hr) Emission Rate

(lbs/ton glass) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 1.3 x 10 -2 

## 3.6 x 10 -2



## Methanol <1.2 x 10 -3 

## <3.4 x 10 -3 

## 641

Phenol <1.8 x 10 -3 

## <5.1 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 1.5 x 10 -2 

## 3.5 x 10 -2



## Methanol <1.5 x 10 -3 

## <3.7 x 10 -3 

## 642

Phenol <2.3 x 10 -3 

## <5.5 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 1.5 x 10 -2 

## 1.7 x 10 -1



## Methanol <3.0 x 10 -4 

## <3.3 x 10 -3 

## 653

Phenol <4.5 x 10 -4 

## <5.0 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 2.1 x 10 -2 

## 6.0 x 10 -1



## Methanol <1.2 x 10 -4 

## <3.3 x 10 -3 

## 654

Phenol <1.8 x 10 -4 

## <5.0 x 10 -3



### Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

1 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

2 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.09

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 13, 2011 

## ii TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................

................................................... ..................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ................................

................................................... ............ 2

2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING



## ................................................... ................................................... . 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............. ................................ 2

3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY



## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT



## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 2

3.2 F ORMALDEHYDE



## , M ETHANOL



## , AND 

## P HENOL 

## (USEPA M ETHOD 

## 316)................................ 3

4.0 TEST RESULTS .......................................

................................................... ....................... 4

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel

Table 2 – Overall Emissions Test Program Results Su mmary

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Forming and Collection 641 Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 2 – Forming and Collection 642 Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 3 – Cooling 653 Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 4 – Curing 654 Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 5 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng

Figure 6 – Method 316 Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results

Appendix B – Process Data

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Shee ts and Notes

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.09

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report Janury 13, 2011 1 

## 1.0 Introduction

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate formaldehyde,

methanol, and phenol emission rates from four exhau st stacks (641E, 642E, 653E, 654E)

associated with Line 106 located at the Johns Manvi lle International (Johns Manville) Plant in

Winder, Georgia.

Reference test methods used and test program method ologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on

September 18 and 21, 2010. The test program consis ted of triplicate emission tests at each

location for each parameter. The field sampling po rtion of the emissions test program included

the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

Matthew Smith BTEC

Jeff Peitzsch BTEC

Paul Molenda BTEC

John Beach BTEC

Thomas Snyder BTEC

Patti Blevins Johns Manville

3 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

4 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.09

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report Janury 13, 2011 2 

## 2.0 Process Description

Glass batch materials are fed into an electric melt er and melted to form fiberglass. The glass

then proceeds through the forming and collection pr ocess and then through a binder curing oven

and then through a cooling process.

2.1 Process Monitoring

During the emissions test program, the electric mel t furnaces were operated under normal

conditions. In addition to production rate during each test run, process operating data recorded

during the emissions test program included (1) melt er temperature, (2) raw material feed rate

(ton/hr), (3) baghouse pressure drop, (4) venturi ( flow, pressure), (5) WESP (flow, voltage,

amps), and (6) RTO (temp, pressure). Process produ ction data is available in Appendix B.

Control equipment data will be available to U.S. EP A on request.

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emiss ions test program can be separated into two

categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content; and

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas formaldehyde, methanol, and phenol concentrations and

emission rates.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologi es by category are summarized by Sections

3.1 and 3.2.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moistur e Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content was conducted

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate”

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concent rations in

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Ana lyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust ga s flowrates in conjunction with the

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate pollutant emission rates.

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in acco rdance with the procedures outlined in

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figures 14- for a traver se location drawings). An S-type pitot tube

with a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accorda nce with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.09

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report Janury 13, 2011 3 

## to measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location

during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions w ill be within specified limits, therefore, a

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionl ess) will be assigned.

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O 2 

## content of the

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 1 00-L O 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent)

and the CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a Ca lifornia Analytical Instruments

(CAI0 600 Series CO 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sampl e of the gas stream was

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe wi th an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing an evacuated sample lung. At the completion of

each test the gas sample was introduced to the anal yzers. Data was recorded at 4-second

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition so ftware. A schematic drawing of the emission

monitoring system is provided as Figure 5.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Me thod 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was

be determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger).

3.2 Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol (USEPA Method 31 6)

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 316, “Sampling and Analysis for Formaldehyde Emissions

from Stationary Sources in the Mineral Wool and Woo l Fiberglass Industries” with analysis by

NCASI CI/WP-98.01 was used to measure formaldehyde, methanol, and phenol concentrations

and calculate emission rates (see Figure 6 for a sc hematic of the sampling train). Triplicate 64-

minute or 72-minute test runs were conducted for ea ch source.

BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m consisted of (1) a

glass nozzle, (2) a glass probe, (3) a set of four modified Greenburg-Smith (GS) impingers with

the first two impingers each containing 100 ml of d eionized ultrafiltered water, a third empty

impinger, and a fourth impinger containing approxim ately 300 g of silica gel desiccant, (5) a

length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and

calibrated orifice.

A sampling train leak test was conducted before and after each test run. After completion of the

final leak test for each test run the nozzle, probe , and impingers were triple rinsed with

ultrafiltered water which was collected in a pre-cl eaned sample container.

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.09

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report Janury 13, 2011 4 

## 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions test program a re summarized by Table 2.

Table 2

Overall Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Stack Pollutant Emission

Rate

(lbs/hr) Emission Rate

(lbs/ton glass) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 1.3 x 10 -2 

## 3.6 x 10 -2



## Methanol <1.2 x 10 -3 

## <3.4 x 10 -3 

## 641

Phenol <1.8 x 10 -3 

## <5.1 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 1.5 x 10 -2 

## 3.5 x 10 -2



## Methanol <1.5 x 10 -3 

## <3.7 x 10 -3 

## 642

Phenol <2.3 x 10 -3 

## <5.5 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 1.5 x 10 -2 

## 1.7 x 10 -1



## Methanol <3.0 x 10 -4 

## <3.3 x 10 -3 

## 653

Phenol <4.5 x 10 -4 

## <5.0 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 2.1 x 10 -2 

## 6.0 x 10 -1



## Methanol <1.2 x 10 -4 

## <3.3 x 10 -3 

## 654

Phenol <1.8 x 10 -4 

## <5.0 x 10 -3



### Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.



## Detailed results for individual emission test run a re summarized in Appendix A. Process

production data is included in Appendix B. Field a nd computer-generated data sheets are

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibr ation documents and Appendix E includes

laboratory analytical reports.

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.09

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report Janury 13, 2011 5 

## Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this repor t are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or

Johns Manville International. BTEC will not distri bute or publish this report without NAIMA’s

consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent

performance of its duties in executing the assignme nt and preparing reports in accordance with

the normal standards of the profession, but disclai ms any responsibility for consequential

damages.

This report was prepared by:

Brandon V. Chase

Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by:

Randal J. Tysar

Senior Environmental Engineer

# Figures

### diameter = 120 inches

Points Distance "

1 3.84

2 12.6

3 23.28

4 38.76

5 81.24

6 96.72

7 107.4

8 116.16



## Figure No. 1

Site: Sampling Date:

Johns Manville Test Date: September 18, 2010

Winder, Georgia

Stack 641 BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan N ot to Scale > 2 diamters

> 8 diamters

### diameter = 120 inches

Points Distance "

1 3.84

2 12.6

3 23.28

4 38.76

5 81.24

6 96.72

7 107.4

8 116.16



## Figure No. 2

Site: Sampling Date:

Johns Manville Test Date: September 18, 2010

Winder, Georgia

Stack 642 BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan N ot to Scale > 2 diamters

> 8 diamters

### diameter = 42"

Points Distance "

12 0.9

11 2.8

10 5.0

9 7.4

8 10.5

7 15.0

6 27.0

5 31.5

4 34.6

3 37.0

2 39.2

1 41.1



## Figure 3

Site:

Johns Manville Test Date: September 21, 2010

Winder, Georgia

Stack 653 BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan N ot to Scale > 2 diamters

> 8 diamters

### diameter = 47.5"

Points Distance "

12 1.0

11 3.2

10 5.6

9 8.4

8 11.9

7 16.9

6 30.6

5 35.6

4 39.1

3 41.9

2 44.3

1 46.5



## Figure 4

Site:

Johns Manville Test Date: September 21, 2010

Winder, Georgia

Stack 654 BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan N ot to Scale > 2 diamters

> 8 diamters

### Bags Samples

to analyzers



## Figure 5

Site:

USEPA Method 3 A Test Date: September 19 & 21, 2010

Johns Manville

Winder, Georgia

106 Line BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan Data Acquisition System



### Calibration Gases

(Fed to Probe Tip) M&C Model 100-L

O 2 

### Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO 2 

### Analyzer pump tedlar

bagFigure 6Site:USEPA Method 316 Test Date: September 19 & 21, 2010Johns ManvilleWinder, Georgia106 LineBT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 Wolcott FerndaleMichigan 48220PumpSilica gel100 ml Ultrafiltered H2OHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5

# APPENDIX A

DETAILED TEST RUN RESULTS

## Plant 641E F&C Stack Job #

Location Method 316 Test

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/18/2010 9/18/2010 9/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 8:55:00 10:28:00 12:01:00

Run Finish Time 10:06:00 11:39:00 13:13:00

Net Traversing Points 16 16 16



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64 64



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.14 30.14 30.11 30.13



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.30 1.30 1.32 1.31



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 40.925 41.118 41.675 41.239



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 75.13 81.91 86.84 81.29



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 41.336 41.012 41.153 41.167



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 45 44 46 45.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.12 2.07 2.17 2.12



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.9 4.8 5.0 4.9



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.951 0.952 0.950 0.951



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.0 19.9 19.7 19.9



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.7 79.8 79.8 79.8



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.85 28.84 28.87 28.85



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.32 28.32 28.32 28.32



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.20 30.20 30.17 30.19



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 94 94 96 95



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.148 0.146 0.148 0.148



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 22.2 22.1 22.3 22.2



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 78.5 78.5 78.5 78.5



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 95,889 95,319

95,490

95,566



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 104,785 104,171

105,050

104,669



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.0 100.8 101.0 100.9



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 54.0 36.0 37.0 42.3



### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 4.6E-02 3.1E-02 3.2E-02 3.6E-02



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.7E-02 1.1E-02 1.1E-02 1.3E-02



### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0



### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 3.4E-03 3.4E-03 3.4E-03 3.4E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-03 1.2E-03 1.2E-03 1.2E-03



### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0



### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 5.1E-03 5.2E-03 5.1E-03 5.1E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-03 1.8E-03 1.8E-03 1.8E-03



### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.09

Johns Manville

Winder, GA JP Personnel

## Plant 642E F&C Stack Job #

Location Method 316 Test

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/18/2010 9/18/2010 9/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 8:55:00 10:28:00 12:01:00

Run Finish Time 10:07:00 11:41:00 13:14:00

Net Traversing Points 16 16 16



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64 64



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.277 0.277 0.277 0.277



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.01 1.00 0.97 0.99



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 39.240 39.220 39.020 39.160



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 77.44 86.41 93.94 85.93



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 39.047 38.385 37.668 38.367



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 38 35 35 36.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.79 1.65 1.65 1.69



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.2



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.956 0.959 0.958 0.958



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.0 19.9 19.8 19.9



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.8 79.8 79.7 79.8



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.83 28.84 28.87 28.85



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.36 28.40 28.42 28.39



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O 1.1 1.10 1.10 1.10



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.22 30.22 30.22 30.22



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 96 96 98 97



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.208 0.202 0.194 0.201



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 26.4 26.0 25.5 25.9



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 78.5 78.5 78.5 78.5



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 114,066 112,571

109,909

112,182



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 124,297 122,329

120,094

122,240



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.4 100.1 100.6 100.4



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 47.0 44.0 23.0 38.0



### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 4.3E-02 4.0E-02 2.2E-02 3.5E-02



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-02 1.7E-02 8.9E-03 1.5E-02



### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0



### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E-03 3.7E-03 3.7E-03 3.7E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E-03 1.6E-03 1.5E-03 1.5E-03



### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0



### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 5.4E-03 5.5E-03 5.6E-03 5.5E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.3E-03 2.3E-03 2.3E-03 2.3E-03



### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.09

Johns Manville

Winder, GA MS Personnel

## Plant 653E Cooling Stack Job #

Location Method 316 Test

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/21/2010 9/21/2010 9/21/2010

Start Run Start Time 8:00:00 9:50:00 11:29:00

Run Finish Time 9:22:00 11:11:00 12:50:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.208 0.208 0.208 0.208



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.10 30.10 30.05 30.08



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 0.97 0.99 1.03 1.00



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 42.925 43.920 45.150 43.998



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 79.79 93.17 100.29 91.08



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 42.467 42.403 42.969 42.613



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 21 21 23 21.7



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 0.99 0.99 1.08 1.02



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.3



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.977 0.977 0.975 0.977



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.9 79.7 79.6 79.7



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.80 28.84 28.85 28.83



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.56 28.59 28.59 28.58



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.11 30.11 30.06 30.09



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122 122 119 121



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.640 0.642 0.652 0.644



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 46.7 46.8 47.1 46.9



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 24,060 24,082

24,298

24,147



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 26,958 26,996

27,192

27,049



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.1 99.8 100.2 100.0



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 210.0 200.0 190.0 200.0



### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E-01 1.7E-01 1.6E-01 1.7E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-02 1.5E-02 1.4E-02 1.5E-02



### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0



### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 3.3E-03 3.3E-03 3.3E-03 3.3E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.0E-04 3.0E-04 3.0E-04 3.0E-04



### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0



### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 5.0E-03 5.0E-03 4.9E-03 5.0E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.5E-04 4.5E-04 4.5E-04 4.5E-04



### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.09

Johns Manville

Winder, GA JP Personnel

## Plant 654E Oven Stack Job #

Location Method 316 Test

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/21/2010 9/21/2010 9/21/2010

Start Run Start Time 8:00:00 9:50:00 11:29:00

Run Finish Time 9:22:00 11:11:00 12:50:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.371 0.371 0.371 0.371



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.05 30.05 30.05 30.05



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.10 1.17 1.09 1.12



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 42.370 43.910 42.650 42.977



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 78.75 88.77 96.81 88.11



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 42.361 43.106 41.256 42.241



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 92 89 80 87.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 4.33 4.19 3.77 4.10



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 9.3 8.9 8.4 8.8



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.907 0.911 0.916 0.912



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.4



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 17.7 18.2 18.2 18.0



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.9 80.5 80.2 80.5



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.93 28.94 28.98 28.95



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.92 27.97 28.07 27.98



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.38 -0.38 -0.38 -0.38



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.02 30.02 30.02 30.02



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 497 498 499 498



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.110 0.114 0.104 0.109



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 25.3 25.7 24.6 25.2



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 9,383 9,590

9,207

9,393



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 18,678 19,016

18,184

18,626



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 103.0 102.5 102.2 102.5



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 710.0 750.0 700.0 720.0



### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 5.9E-01 6.1E-01 6.0E-01 6.0E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.1E-02 2.2E-02 2.1E-02 2.1E-02



### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0



### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 3.3E-03 3.3E-03 3.4E-03 3.3E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04



### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0



### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 5.0E-03 4.9E-03 5.1E-03 5.0E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-04 1.8E-04 1.8E-04 1.8E-04



### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.06

Johns Manville

Winder, GA MS Personnel

# APPENDIX B

PROCESS DATA

# APPENDIX C

FIELD AND COMPUTER-GENERATED DATA

SHEETSBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.09 Probe # 12A Pollutant Points/Port 8Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB 6 Method 316 Total Points16Location Winder, GARate (cfm)Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 4.0Source 641 Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 18-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JPBws (%)4.87 # of Ports 2 Total Run64.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 35Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.20Barometric30.14 Silica Gel Weight Gain 10DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)30.14Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.77Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)20 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 10.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.3Md28.85Stack Area (sf)78.54Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.32Act. Flow (cfm)104,785Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 41.28Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)100,802Moisture % 4.88Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)95,889Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.80.0 4.0 8:5593.09 0.14 93 69 691.221.22 240 243 63 274.0 8.0 8:5995.56 0.15 94 72 701.301.31 243 250 61 268.0 12.0 9:0398.12 0.15 94 72 701.301.31 245 250 60 2512.0 16.0 9:07100.65 0.15 94 74 701.301.31 245 250 58 2416.0 20.0 9:11103.22 0.16 94 75 701.391.4 245 250 57 2320.0 24.0 9:15105.87 0.15 94 77 711.301.31 246 250 57 2224.0 28.0 9:19108.46 0.16 94 78 721.391.4 245 250 58 2128.0 32.0 9:23111.13 0.16 94 79 731.391.4 245 250 59 2832.0 36.0 9:27113.80 0.14 94 75 731.221.23 246 250 58 2736.0 40.0 9:34116.28 0.16 94 80 741.391.4 247 248 58 2640.0 44.0 9:38118.97 0.15 94 81 741.301.32 246 247 57 2544.0 48.0 9:42121.57 0.14 94 81 741.221.23 245 248 58 2448.0 52.0 9:46124.04 0.14 94 82 751.221.23 246 248 58 2352.0 56.0 9:50126.51 0.14 94 82 751.221.23 248 250 58 2256.0 60.0 9:54129.00 0.14 94 82 761.221.23 248 248 59 2160.0 64.0 9:58131.52 0.14 94 83 761.221.23 248 247 59 264.0 10:06134.01Average:40.93 0.15 93.9 77.6 72.61.291.30 246 249 58.625 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.09 Probe # 12A Pollutant 0 Points/Port 8Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB 6 Method 316 Total Points16Location Winder, GARate (cfm)Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 4.0Source 641 Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 18-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JPBws (%)4.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run64.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 35Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.20Barometric30.14 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)30.14Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.77Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)19.9 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 10.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.3Md28.84Stack Area (sf)78.54Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.32Act. Flow (cfm)104,171Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 40.96Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)100,133Moisture % 4.81Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)95,319Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.80.0 4.0 10:28134.21 0.15 94 77 771.321.33 247 250 65 274.0 8.0 10:32136.80 0.16 94 81 771.411.42 246 250 62 268.0 12.0 10:36139.50 0.15 94 82 771.321.33 248 251 61 2512.0 16.0 10:40142.09 0.15 94 83 771.321.33 250 253 61 2416.0 20.0 10:44144.67 0.14 94 84 781.231.24 254 250 59 2320.0 24.0 10:48147.20 0.15 94 84 781.321.33 248 249 60 2224.0 28.0 10:52149.78 0.14 94 84 791.231.24 248 251 60 2128.0 32.0 11:00152.28 0.14 94 85 791.231.24 252 249 58 2832.0 36.0 11:07154.79 0.14 94 81 791.231.24 255 250 58 2736.0 40.0 11:11157.28 0.14 94 84 801.231.24 255 243 58 2640.0 44.0 11:15159.80 0.15 95 85 901.321.33 256 255 58 2544.0 48.0 11:19162.44 0.14 95 86 801.231.25 250 250 57 2448.0 52.0 11:23164.94 0.15 95 87 811.321.34 252 249 57 2352.0 56.0 11:27167.54 0.14 95 87 811.231.25 250 253 57 2256.0 60.0 11:31170.10 0.15 95 88 811.321.34 250 249 57 2160.0 64.0 11:35172.71 0.15 95 88 811.321.34 251 251 57 264.0 11:39175.33Average:41.12 0.15 94.4 84.1 79.71.291.30 250.8 250.2 59.1 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.09 Probe # 12A Pollutant 0 Points/Port 8Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB 6 Method 316 Total Points16Location Winder, GARate (cfm)Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 4.0Source 641 Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 18-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JPBws (%)5.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run64.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 38Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.17Barometric30.11 Silica Gel Weight Gain 8DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)30.11Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.77Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)19.7 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 10.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.5Md28.87Stack Area (sf)78.54Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.32Act. Flow (cfm)105,050Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 41.10Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)100,514Moisture % 5.00Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)95,490Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.80.0 4.0 12:01175.57 0.14 96 83 831.231.25 247 250 65 274.0 8.0 12:05178.07 0.15 96 86 831.321.34 250 250 64 268.0 12.0 12:09180.66 0.15 96 88 831.321.34 250 251 60 2512.0 16.0 12:13183.27 0.15 96 88 831.321.34 250 246 59 2416.0 20.0 12:17185.88 0.15 96 89 831.321.34 251 248 59 2320.0 24.0 12:21188.53 0.16 96 90 841.411.43 250 248 60 2224.0 28.0 12:25191.22 0.17 96 90 841.501.52 252 250 60 2128.0 32.0 12:33194.01 0.16 96 91 841.411.43 250 250 60 2832.0 36.0 12:41196.71 0.14 96 87 851.231.25 250 255 60 2736.0 40.0 12:45199.27 0.14 96 90 851.231.25 250 248 60 2640.0 44.0 12:49201.79 0.15 97 90 861.321.34 248 253 59 2544.0 48.0 12:53204.40 0.14 97 90 861.231.25 250 251 60 2448.0 52.0 12:57206.92 0.14 97 91 861.231.25 254 255 60 2352.0 56.0 13:01209.48 0.14 97 91 861.231.25 250 250 60 2256.0 60.0 13:05212.06 0.15 97 91 861.321.34 251 249 59 2160.0 64.0 13:09214.69 0.14 97 91 861.231.25 249 250 60 264.0 13:13217.24Average:41.68 0.15 96.4 89.1 84.61.311.32 250.1 250.3 60.3125 2.0Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.09 Probe # 5ft D PollutantFormaldehyd Points/Port 4Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-5 Method 316 Total Points16Location Winder, GARate (cfm)0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 4.0Source 642 Delta∆H@ 1.53 Date 18-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MSBws (%)4.38 # of Ports 4 Total Run64.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 30Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.22Barometric30.14 Silica Gel Weight Gain 8DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.14Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)1.1Actual Dn (in)0.277O2 (%)20 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 10.00 An (ft^2)0.00042CO2 (%)0.2Md28.83Stack Area (sf)78.54Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.36Act. Flow (cfm)124,297Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 39.06Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)48.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)119,291Moisture % 4.38Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)114,066Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.40.0 4.0 8:55337.20 0.21 95 71 711.021.01 250 250 66 234.0 8.0 8:59339.68 0.21 95 73 721.021.01 248 250 62 228.0 12.0 9:03342.15 0.21 96 75 721.021.01 249 249 61 2112.0 16.0 9:07344.59 0.21 96 76 731.021.01 249 250 61 2416.0 20.0 9:13347.04 0.20 95 75 730.970.97 250 250 61 2320.0 24.0 9:17349.43 0.20 96 78 740.970.97 250 250 61 2224.0 28.0 9:21351.82 0.20 96 80 750.970.97 249 250 61 2128.0 32.0 9:25354.22 0.20 95 81 750.970.97 249 250 61 2432.0 36.0 9:34356.65 0.20 96 79 760.970.97 249 250 61 2336.0 40.0 9:38359.05 0.21 96 82 771.021.02 253 250 61 2240.0 44.0 9:42361.50 0.21 96 82 771.021.02 252 249 61 2144.0 48.0 9:46364.00 0.20 96 83 780.970.97 250 250 61 2448.0 52.0 9:51366.41 0.22 95 82 781.061.07 250 247 62 2352.0 56.0 9:55368.93 0.22 96 84 791.061.07 248 250 62 2256.0 60.0 9:59371.41 0.22 96 84 791.061.07 250 250 64 2160.0 64.0 10:03373.95 0.21 96 85 791.021.02 251 250 64 264.0 10:07376.44Average:39.24 0.21 95.7 79.4 75.51.011.01 250 250 61.875 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.09 Probe # 5ft D PollutantFormaldehyd Points/Port 4Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-5 Method 316 Total Points16Location Winder, GARate (cfm)Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 4.0Source 642 Delta∆H@ 1.53 Date 18-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MSBws (%)4.1 # of Ports 4 Total Run64.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 27Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.22Barometric30.14 Silica Gel Weight Gain 8DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.14Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)1.1Actual Dn (in)0.277O2 (%)19.9 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 10.00 An (ft^2)0.00042CO2 (%)0.3Md28.84Stack Area (sf)78.54Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.40Act. Flow (cfm)122,329Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 38.39Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)117,403Moisture % 4.11Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)112,571Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.40.0 4.0 10:28376.45 0.20 96 82 800.990.98 250 250 65 234.0 8.0 10:32378.90 0.21 97 84 811.041.03 251 250 65 228.0 12.0 10:36381.33 0.21 97 85 811.041.03 250 249 65 2112.0 16.0 10:40383.78 0.20 89 86 820.990.99 251 250 64 2416.0 20.0 10:44386.22 0.20 95 86 820.990.99 250 250 64 2320.0 24.0 10:48388.70 0.19 95 87 830.940.94 249 250 64 2224.0 28.0 10:52391.10 0.20 95 88 830.990.99 250 250 64 2128.0 32.0 10:56393.54 0.19 96 89 840.940.94 251 249 63 2432.0 36.0 11:07395.92 0.19 95 88 840.940.94 250 250 63 2336.0 40.0 11:11398.32 0.21 96 91 851.041.04 250 251 62 2240.0 44.0 11:15400.80 0.20 96 91 850.990.99 250 249 62 2144.0 48.0 11:19403.22 0.20 97 92 850.990.99 250 249 62 2448.0 52.0 11:25405.65 0.21 96 91 861.041.04 249 251 62 2352.0 56.0 11:29408.12 0.21 97 93 871.041.04 250 251 62 2256.0 60.0 11:33410.64 0.21 97 94 871.041.04 251 251 62 2160.0 64.0 11:37413.16 0.20 97 95 880.990.99 250 250 63 264.0 11:41415.67Average:39.22 0.20 95.7 88.9 83.91.001.00 250.1 250.0 63.3 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.09 Probe # 5ft D PollutantFormaldehyd Points/Port 4Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-5 Method 316 Total Points16Location Winder, GARate (cfm)Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 4.0Source 642 Delta∆H@ 1.53 Date 18-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MSBws (%)4.2 # of Ports 4 Total Run64.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 26Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.22Barometric30.14 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.14Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)1.1Actual Dn (in)0.277O2 (%)19.8 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 10.00 An (ft^2)0.00042CO2 (%)0.5Md28.87Stack Area (sf)78.54Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.42Act. Flow (cfm)120,094Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 37.68Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)114,716Moisture % 4.19Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)109,909Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.40.0 4.0 12:01415.78 0.20 97 92 901.001 251 250 66 234.0 8.0 12:05418.20 0.20 98 95 901.001 250 249 65 228.0 12.0 12:09420.67 0.20 98 95 911.001 249 251 65 2112.0 16.0 12:13423.20 0.20 98 96 911.001 250 250 64 2416.0 20.0 12:22425.64 0.19 98 96 910.950.95 252 250 64 2320.0 24.0 12:26428.10 0.19 98 96 910.950.95 251 250 64 2224.0 28.0 12:30430.51 0.19 98 96 920.950.95 250 250 64 2128.0 32.0 12:34432.92 0.19 98 97 920.950.95 248 250 64 2432.0 36.0 12:40435.38 0.19 99 96 920.950.95 250 250 63 2336.0 40.0 12:44437.74 0.19 98 97 930.950.95 249 250 63 2240.0 44.0 12:48440.17 0.19 99 97 930.950.95 250 250 63 2144.0 48.0 12:52442.61 0.19 99 97 930.950.95 250 250 63 2448.0 52.0 12:58445.04 0.20 98 95 931.001 250 250 62 2352.0 56.0 13:02447.50 0.20 99 96 931.001 249 248 63 2256.0 60.0 13:06450.00 0.19 99 97 930.950.95 251 252 63 2160.0 64.0 13:10452.41 0.19 99 97 930.950.95 250 251 63 264.0 13:14454.80Average:39.02 0.19 98.3 95.9 91.90.970.97 250.0 250.1 63.6875 2.0Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.09 Probe # 5ftB PollutantFormaldehyd Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB5 Method 316 Total Points24Location Winder, GARate (cfm)Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 3.0Source 653E Cooling Delta∆H@ 1.53 Date 21-Sep-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator JPBws (%)2.27 # of Ports 2 Total Run72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 13Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.11Barometric30.10 Silica Gel Weight Gain 8DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.10Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.13Actual Dn (in)0.208O2 (%)20.1 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.50 An (ft^2)0.00024CO2 (%)0.0Md28.80Stack Area (sf)9.62Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.56Act. Flow (cfm)26,958Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 42.38Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)24,621Moisture % 2.28Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)24,060Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 3.0 8:00477.66 0.40 120 73 730.610.6 248 253 54 1.5113.0 6.0 8:03479.07 0.50 120 73 730.760.75 250 250 57 1.5106.0 9.0 8:06480.66 0.65 122 74 730.990.98 248 251 58 299.0 12.0 8:09482.45 0.69 122 74 731.051.04 249 250 58 2812.0 15.0 8:12484.31 0.76 121 75 731.161.14 251 251 56 2715.0 18.0 8:15486.26 0.82 122 76 741.251.23 252 251 55 2618.0 21.0 8:18488.27 0.85 122 78 741.301.28 250 250 54 2521.0 24.0 8:21490.34 0.82 122 79 741.251.23 248 251 54 2424.0 27.0 8:24492.40 0.73 122 80 751.111.1 252 250 54 2327.0 30.0 8:27494.30 0.65 122 81 750.990.98 250 251 54 2230.0 33.0 8:30496.10 0.47 122 82 760.720.71 251 250 54 2133.0 36.0 8:33497.67 0.32 122 83 760.490.48 250 250 55 21236.0 39.0 8:46498.97 0.25 122 80 790.380.38 245 249 60 1.51139.0 42.0 8:49500.11 0.37 122 83 790.560.56 245 250 60 1.51042.0 45.0 8:52501.51 0.50 122 84 800.760.75 249 250 60 1.5945.0 48.0 8:55503.10 0.57 122 85 800.870.86 254 249 60 2848.0 51.0 8:58504.80 0.61 122 86 810.930.92 249 250 59 2751.0 54.0 9:01506.58 0.76 122 86 811.161.15 251 250 59 2654.0 57.0 9:04508.54 0.85 122 87 821.301.29 252 250 58 2557.0 60.0 9:07510.66 0.87 122 88 821.331.32 249 250 58 2460.0 63.0 9:10512.78 0.85 122 89 831.301.29 250 249 58 2363.0 66.0 9:13514.89 0.81 122 89 831.241.23 249 250 58 2266.0 69.0 9:16516.94 0.65 122 89 840.990.99 251 251 58 2169.0 72.0 9:19518.80 0.60 122 89 840.920.91 250 250 58 272.0 9:22520.58Average:42.93 0.64 121.8 81.8 77.80.980.97 250 250 57.0416667 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.09 Probe # 5ftB PollutantFormaldehyd Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB 5 Method 316 Total Points24Location Winder, GARate (cfm)Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 3.0Source 653E Cooling Delta∆H@ 1.53 Date 21-Sep-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator JPBws (%)2.3 # of Ports 2 Total Run72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 13Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.11Barometric30.10 Silica Gel Weight Gain 8DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.10Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.13Actual Dn (in)0.208O2 (%)20.1 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.50 An (ft^2)0.00024CO2 (%)0.2Md28.84Stack Area (sf)9.62Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.59Act. Flow (cfm)26,996Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 42.31Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)24,643Moisture % 2.28Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)24,082Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 3.0 9:50521.22 0.30 123 87 870.470.46 250 250 64 1.5113.0 6.0 9:53522.48 0.38 123 89 870.590.58 249 251 63 1.5106.0 9.0 9:56523.91 0.47 123 89 870.730.72 248 250 61 1.599.0 12.0 9:59525.46 0.56 123 90 880.880.86 249 251 56 2812.0 15.0 10:02527.18 0.66 123 91 881.031.02 250 250 52 2715.0 18.0 10:05529.06 0.77 123 92 881.201.19 253 249 51 2618.0 21.0 10:08531.06 0.84 123 93 891.311.29 250 251 50 2.5521.0 24.0 10:11533.18 0.82 123 94 891.281.26 248 249 50 2.5424.0 27.0 10:14535.27 0.83 123 95 891.301.28 252 251 50 2.5327.0 30.0 10:17537.35 0.80 123 96 901.251.23 250 249 50 2.5230.0 33.0 10:20539.44 0.65 123 96 901.021.00 250 250 50 2133.0 36.0 10:23541.31 0.58 123 96 910.910.90 250 250 50 21236.0 39.0 10:35543.06 0.43 123 93 920.670.66 250 250 58 1.51139.0 42.0 10:38544.56 0.55 124 95 920.860.85 248 250 57 21042.0 45.0 10:41546.28 0.66 124 96 921.031.02 249 251 55 2945.0 48.0 10:44548.15 0.71 124 97 931.111.10 250 251 55 2848.0 51.0 10:47550.10 0.85 125 98 931.331.32 251 250 54 2.5751.0 54.0 10:50552.26 0.88 125 99 941.381.36 252 250 53 2.5654.0 57.0 10:53554.42 0.86 125 99 941.341.33 247 250 55 2.5557.0 60.0 10:56556.56 0.82 119 100 941.281.27 251 252 55 2.5460.0 63.0 10:59558.66 0.70 117 100 951.091.09 249 249 55 2363.0 66.0 11:02560.60 0.56 116 100 950.880.87 247 251 56 2266.0 69.0 11:05562.33 0.45 116 100 950.700.70 251 248 56 2169.0 72.0 11:08563.91 0.27 116 100 950.420.42 250 250 56 272.0 11:11565.14Average:43.92 0.64 122.1 95.2 91.11.000.99 249.8 250.1 54.7 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.09 Probe # 5ftB PollutantFormaldehyd Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB 6 Method 316 Total Points24Location Winder, GARate (cfm)Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 3.0Source 653E Cooling Delta∆H@ 1.53 Date 21-Sep-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator JPBws (%)2.5 # of Ports 2 Total Run72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 16Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.06Barometric30.05 Silica Gel Weight Gain 7DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.05Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.13Actual Dn (in)0.208O2 (%)20.1 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.50 An (ft^2)0.00024CO2 (%)0.3Md28.85Stack Area (sf)9.62Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.59Act. Flow (cfm)27,192Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 42.87Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)24,910Moisture % 2.46Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)24,298Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 3.0 11:29565.35 0.38 117 96 960.600.6 250 250 63 1.5113.0 6.0 11:32566.80 0.47 116 98 960.750.74 249 250 63 1.5106.0 9.0 11:35568.41 0.66 117 98 971.051.04 250 250 62 299.0 12.0 11:38570.30 0.73 118 99 971.161.15 251 249 62 2812.0 15.0 11:41572.31 0.82 118 99 971.301.3 251 252 62 2715.0 18.0 11:44574.44 0.86 118 99 971.361.36 251 250 61 2618.0 21.0 11:47576.59 0.83 118 100 971.321.31 250 251 61 2521.0 24.0 11:50578.75 0.81 118 101 971.281.28 250 250 61 2424.0 27.0 11:53580.86 0.72 119 101 971.141.14 250 250 61 2327.0 30.0 11:56582.83 0.56 119 101 980.890.89 251 250 61 2230.0 33.0 11:59584.60 0.46 119 102 980.730.73 250 249 62 1.5133.0 36.0 12:05586.20 0.34 119 102 980.540.54 252 248 62 1.51236.0 39.0 12:14587.59 0.33 120 100 990.520.52 250 250 63 1.51139.0 42.0 12:17588.95 0.41 120 102 990.650.65 250 250 63 1.51042.0 45.0 12:20590.44 0.53 120 102 990.840.84 248 249 62 1.5945.0 48.0 12:23592.16 0.63 120 103 1001.001 251 250 61 2848.0 51.0 12:26594.05 0.70 120 103 1001.111.11 253 250 60 2751.0 54.0 12:29596.00 0.81 120 104 1001.281.28 248 251 59 2654.0 57.0 12:32598.13 0.85 120 105 1001.351.34 251 250 58 2557.0 60.0 12:35600.30 0.87 120 105 1011.381.38 250 250 57 2460.0 63.0 12:38602.51 0.85 120 106 1011.351.34 250 250 58 2363.0 66.0 12:41604.68 0.80 121 106 1011.271.27 248 251 58 2266.0 69.0 12:44606.80 0.64 120 106 1021.021.01 250 250 58 2169.0 72.0 12:47608.70 0.58 120 107 1020.920.92 251 251 59 272.0 12:50610.50Average:45.15 0.65 119.0 101.9 98.71.031.03 250.2 250.0 60.7083333 1.9Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.06 Probe # 5 ft. D Pollutant Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-6 Method 316 Total Points24Location Winder, GARate (cfm)0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 3.0Source 654E RTO Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 21-Sep-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator MSBws (%)9.27 # of Ports 2 Total Run72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 83Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.02Barometric30.05 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)30.05Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.38Actual Dn (in)0.371O2 (%)17.7 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.96 An (ft^2)0.00075CO2 (%)1.4Md28.93Stack Area (sf)12.32Est.DH(in H2O) Ms27.92Act. Flow (cfm)18,678Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 42.21Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)54.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)10,342Moisture % 9.31Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)9,383Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 3.0 8:00243.56 0.07 493 70 700.670.7 250 251 46 2113.0 6.0 8:03244.98 0.08 496 71 700.770.8 248 250 46 2106.0 9.0 8:06246.50 0.08 493 72 710.770.8 251 250 50 299.0 12.0 8:09247.97 0.10 501 73 710.961 249 250 50 2812.0 15.0 8:12249.64 0.11 499 73 711.051.1 253 251 48 2715.0 18.0 8:15251.40 0.12 496 75 721.151.2 249 251 49 2618.0 21.0 8:18253.24 0.13 498 77 721.251.3 249 249 48 2521.0 24.0 8:21255.16 0.14 502 78 731.341.4 249 250 48 2424.0 27.0 8:24257.13 0.15 500 79 731.441.5 253 251 48 2327.0 30.0 8:27259.17 0.13 499 81 741.251.3 250 250 49 2230.0 33.0 8:30261.09 0.12 494 83 741.151.2 249 249 50 2133.0 36.0 8:33262.95 0.09 494 84 750.860.9 252 250 51 21236.0 39.0 8:46264.56 0.07 498 79 770.670.7 250 253 55 21139.0 42.0 8:49266.00 0.08 495 83 780.770.8 248 250 57 21042.0 45.0 8:52267.52 0.08 494 83 780.770.8 248 250 55 2945.0 48.0 8:55269.05 0.11 498 84 791.051.11 251 251 56 2848.0 51.0 8:58270.80 0.14 495 85 791.341.4 254 251 55 2751.0 54.0 9:01272.80 0.14 496 87 801.341.4 249 251 55 2654.0 57.0 9:04274.82 0.14 503 88 801.341.4 252 250 55 2557.0 60.0 9:07276.83 0.13 496 89 811.251.3 250 251 56 2460.0 63.0 9:10278.82 0.13 500 90 811.251.3 251 251 57 2363.0 66.0 9:13280.80 0.12 495 90 811.151.22 251 251 57 2266.0 69.0 9:16282.65 0.09 493 91 820.860.9 248 251 58 2169.0 72.0 9:19284.30 0.09 496 91 820.860.9 250 249 59 272.0 9:22285.93Average:42.37 0.11 496.8 81.5 76.01.051.10 250 250 52.4166667 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.06 Probe # Pollutant 0 Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-6 Method 316 Total Points24Location Winder, GARate (cfm)0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 3.0Source 654E RTO Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 21-Sep-10 Time/reading 3.0OperatorBws (%)8.9 # of Ports 2 Total Run72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 78Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.02Barometric30.05 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)30.05Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.38Actual Dn (in)0.371O2 (%)18.2 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.96 An (ft^2)0.00075CO2 (%)1.3Md28.94Stack Area (sf)12.32Est.DH(in H2O) Ms27.97Act. Flow (cfm)19,016Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 42.94Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)54.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)10,522Moisture % 8.89Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)9,590Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 3.0 9:50286.14 0.09 499 85 830.880.92 249 250 61 2113.0 6.0 9:53287.76 0.09 497 87 840.880.92 253 253 61 2106.0 9.0 9:56289.39 0.09 498 88 840.880.92 250 249 61 299.0 12.0 9:59291.00 0.11 498 88 841.081.13 249 251 60 2812.0 15.0 10:02292.83 0.13 495 88 841.281.33 248 249 62 2715.0 18.0 10:05294.80 0.14 502 89 841.381.44 251 249 61 2618.0 21.0 10:08296.80 0.15 496 90 841.471.54 249 250 60 2521.0 24.0 10:11298.91 0.14 499 91 851.381.44 252 254 56 2424.0 27.0 10:14300.97 0.13 501 92 851.281.34 250 250 56 2327.0 30.0 10:17302.95 0.12 498 92 851.181.23 252 250 56 2230.0 33.0 10:20304.83 0.11 500 93 851.081.13 249 250 56 2133.0 36.0 10:23306.63 0.10 495 93 860.981.03 252 252 56 21236.0 39.0 10:35308.34 0.07 495 88 860.690.72 250 251 53 21139.0 42.0 10:38309.78 0.07 498 91 860.690.72 250 251 53 21042.0 45.0 10:41311.22 0.10 495 91 860.981.03 252 252 58 2945.0 48.0 10:44312.98 0.11 495 91 861.081.13 248 249 59 2848.0 51.0 10:47314.75 0.12 497 92 871.181.24 253 253 58 2751.0 54.0 10:50316.61 0.13 496 93 871.281.34 250 253 57 2654.0 57.0 10:53318.58 0.14 497 95 881.381.44 250 253 57 2557.0 60.0 10:56320.63 0.14 503 96 881.381.44 250 250 57 2460.0 63.0 10:59322.70 0.14 496 96 881.381.44 251 250 58 2363.0 66.0 11:02324.71 0.11 499 97 891.081.14 249 249 60 2266.0 69.0 11:05326.58 0.10 498 97 890.981.03 252 251 61 2169.0 72.0 11:08328.30 0.10 493 96 890.981.03 249 252 61 272.0 11:11330.05Average:43.91 0.11 497.5 91.6 85.91.121.17 250.3 250.9 58.3 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.06 Probe # 5ft.D Pollutant 0 Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-6 Method 316 Total Points24Location Winder, GARate (cfm)0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 3.0Source 654E RTO Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 21-Sep-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator MSBws (%)8.4 # of Ports 2 Total Run72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 72Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.02Barometric30.05 Silica Gel Weight Gain 8DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)30.05Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.38Actual Dn (in)0.371O2 (%)18.2 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.96 An (ft^2)0.00075CO2 (%)1.6Md28.98Stack Area (sf)12.32Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.07Act. Flow (cfm)18,184Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 41.11Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)54.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)10,048Moisture % 8.39Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)9,207Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 3.0 11:29330.32 0.07 495 91 890.700.73 249 251 66 2113.0 6.0 11:32331.79 0.07 495 94 900.700.73 249 248 66 2106.0 9.0 11:35333.22 0.09 496 94 900.900.94 252 249 65 299.0 12.0 11:38334.88 0.10 503 95 911.011.04 249 252 63 2812.0 15.0 11:41336.61 0.11 498 96 911.111.14 252 250 63 2715.0 18.0 11:44338.43 0.12 503 98 921.211.25 251 249 57 2618.0 21.0 11:47340.37 0.14 498 99 921.411.46 250 253 57 2521.0 24.0 11:50342.42 0.14 500 99 921.411.46 249 249 55 2424.0 27.0 11:53344.48 0.13 503 100 931.311.35 251 250 55 2327.0 30.0 11:56346.47 0.11 502 101 931.111.14 249 250 55 2230.0 33.0 11:59348.29 0.09 498 101 940.900.94 249 250 55 2133.0 36.0 12:02350.00 0.09 495 102 940.900.94 250 250 58 21236.0 39.0 12:14351.66 0.08 497 96 930.800.83 250 250 62 21139.0 42.0 12:17353.21 0.08 498 100 940.800.84 250 250 60 21042.0 45.0 12:20354.78 0.09 498 100 950.900.94 253 249 57 2945.0 48.0 12:23356.40 0.11 498 101 951.111.15 250 250 54 2848.0 51.0 12:26358.22 0.13 499 101 951.311.36 251 250 53 2751.0 54.0 12:29360.22 0.13 506 103 951.311.36 254 251 51 2654.0 57.0 12:32362.22 0.12 500 104 961.211.25 250 250 51 2557.0 60.0 12:35364.15 0.11 500 105 961.111.15 252 247 52 2460.0 63.0 12:38366.02 0.11 501 105 961.111.15 253 251 53 2363.0 66.0 12:41367.90 0.10 498 105 971.011.05 251 249 53 2266.0 69.0 12:44369.62 0.09 496 105 970.900.94 247 251 55 2169.0 72.0 12:47371.30 0.09 495 105 970.910.94 248 250 56 272.0 12:50372.97Average:42.65 0.10 498.8 100.0 93.61.051.09 250.4 250.0 57.1666667 2.0Leak Check

# APPENDIX D

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION DOCUMENTSOxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryJohns Manville - Winder, GeorgiaBTEC Project No. 10-3990.09Sampling Dates: September 18, 2010Forming and Collection 641Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 AverageTest Run Date 9/18/2010 9/18/2010 9/18/2010Test Time 11:54 12:07 14:06Oxygen concentration (%) 20.5 20.4 20.4 20.5Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 20.0 19.9 19.7 19.9Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A)0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3CO2Correction O2Correction1 2 3 12 3Co-0.02 -0.01 -0.01Co0.00 0.03 0.15Cma10.10 10.10 10.10Cma9.97 9.97 9.97Cm9.9 9.9 9.92Cm10.2 10.3 10.41Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gasesOxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryJohns Manville - Winder, GeorgiaBTEC Project No. 10-3990.09Sampling Dates: September 18, 2010Forming and Collection 642Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 AverageTest Run Date 9/18/2010 9/18/2010 9/18/2010Test Time 11:57 12:09 14:09Oxygen concentration (%) 20.5 20.4 20.6 20.5Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 20.0 19.9 19.8 19.9Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A)0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3CO2Correction O2Correction1 2 3 12 3Co-0.02 -0.01 -0.01Co0.00 0.03 0.15Cma10.10 10.10 10.10Cma9.97 9.97 9.97Cm9.9 9.9 9.92Cm10.2 10.3 10.41Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gasesOxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryJohns Manville - Winder, GeorgiaBTEC Project No. 10-3990.09Sampling Dates: September 21, 2010653 - CoolingParameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 AverageTest Run Date 9/21/2010 9/21/2010 9/21/2010Test Time 10:42 12:07 13:37Oxygen concentration (%) 20.6 20.5 20.5 20.6Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A)-0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1CO2Correction O2Correction1 2 3 12 3Co0.01 0.02 0.03Co-0.10 -0.14 0.14Cma10.10 10.10 10.10Cma9.97 9.97 9.97Cm10.0 10.0 9.98Cm10.2 10.1 10.26Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gasesOxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryJohns Manville - Winder, GeorgiaBTEC Project No. 10-3990.09Sampling Dates: September 21, 2010654 - CuringParameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 AverageTest Run Date 9/21/2010 9/21/2010 9/21/2010Test Time 10:45 12:11 13:39Oxygen concentration (%) 18.1 18.5 18.7 18.4Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 17.7 18.2 18.2 18.0Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.4Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A)1.4 1.3 1.6 1.5CO2Correction O2Correction1 2 3 12 3Co0.01 0.02 0.03Co-0.10 -0.14 0.14Cma10.10 10.10 10.10Cma9.97 9.97 9.97Cm10.0 10.0 9.98Cm10.2 10.1 10.26Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gasesMETHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE: 8/12/2010 METER SERIAL #: 1817 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.8 29.8 29.8 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB 6 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °F ELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUMDGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN)DGMΔH(1) (2) (3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)ΔH@1 0.8778 15 570.245 575.950 5.705 85 86 88 85 85 86 5.00 4.175 5.55235.60411.0091.822 0.8778 15 575.950 581.730 5.780 85 88 86 85 85 86 5.00 4.175 5.62535.60410.9961.823 0.8778 15 581.730 587.441 5.711 85 86 87 85 86 86 5.00 4.175 5.55825.60411.0081.82AVG = 1.005-0.811 0.5057 16 587.441 596.625 9.184 85 87 90 86 87 87.5 14.00 1.325 8.85179.03991.0211.722 0.5057 16 596.625 612.380 15.755 85 90 94 87 88 89.75 24.00 1.325 15.122715.49691.0251.723 0.5057 16 612.380 618.290 5.910 85 94 94 88 89 91.25 9.00 1.325 5.65745.81131.0271.71AVG = 1.0241.141 0.3367 16 618.290 623.635 5.345 85 93 93 89 89 91 12.00 0.61 5.10995.15901.0101.772 0.3367 16 623.635 628.985 5.350 85 93 93 89 89 91 12.00 0.61 5.11465.15901.0091.773 0.3367 16 628.985 635.664 6.679 85 93 93 89 90 91.25 15.00 0.61 6.38236.44881.0101.77AVG = 1.010-0.32(1) =Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =1.013Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)ΔH@=0.75θΔH Vm(std) AVERAGEΔH@=1.77(2) =Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conVcr(std)VmTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3) =DGM calibration factor321812METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE: 9/8/2010 METER SERIAL #: 1672 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.67 30.67 30.67 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB5 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °F ELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGMΔH(1)(2)(3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)ΔH@1 0.8778 16 546.40 553.240 6.840 78 78 78 78 78 78 6.00 3.75 6.94426.96621.0031.592 0.8778 16 553.240 560.090 6.850 78 78 78 78 78 78 6.00 3.75 6.95446.96621.0021.593 0.8778 16 560.090 566.890 6.80 78 78 79 78 79 78.5 6.00 3.75 6.89726.96621.0101.59AVG = 1.0050.181 0.5057 16 564.640 570.560 5.920 78 79 81 79 79 79.5 9.00 1.2 5.95726.01981.0111.522 0.5057 16 570.560 576.480 5.920 78 81 82 79 79 80.25 9.00 1.2 5.94896.01981.0121.523 0.5057 16 576.480 582.420 5.940 79 82 84 79 80 81.25 9.00 1.2 5.95806.01421.0091.52AVG = 1.0110.751 0.3367 16 582.420 587.790 5.370 79 83 83 80 80 81.5 12.00 0.52 5.37505.33910.9931.482 0.3367 16 587.790 593.160 5.370 79 83 83 80 81 81.75 12.00 0.52 5.37255.33910.9941.483 0.3367 16 593.160 598.530 5.370 79 83 83 81 81 82 12.00 0.52 5.3705.33910.9941.48AVG = 0.994-0.93AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =1.003AVERAGEΔH@=1.53(1) =Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)ΔH@=0.75θΔH Vm(std)Vcr(std)Vm(2) =Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditionsTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3) =DGM calibration factor321812ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANYUSING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the criticalorifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.()2()TmHPbarVmKVmstd)6.13/(1)(Δ+∗∗=TambPbarKVcrstdΘ∗∗=')()()(stdstdVmVcrY=Meter box 5 cals

# APPENDIX E

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS

### Your Project #: 10-3990.09

Site: JM WINDER

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/10/08



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0D3266

Received: 2010/09/23, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 26

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Formaldehylde (M316) 13 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 BRL SOP-00113 EPA 316

Final Volume of Impinger 13 N/A 2010/10/01

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) ( 1 ) 13 N/A 2010/09/28 BRL SOP-00211 NCASI WP99.01mod

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) C



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: Lina.Barreto@maxxamanalytics.com

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D3266 Client Project #: 10-3990.09

Report Date: 2010/10/08 Project name: JM WINDER



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H G 4 5 1 8 H

G 4 5 1 9 H

G 4 5 1 9 H

G 4 5 2 1 H

G 4 5 2 2

Sampling Date 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/18

U n i t s BLANK-DI RDL R1-641-M316 R1-641-M316 RDL R2-641-M316 RDL R3-641-M316 RDL QC Batch

H2O-M316 Lab-Dup

Formaldehyde ug ND 15 54 54 14 36 16 37 15 2284706

Volume ml 590 1 560 1 640 1 600 1 2288290

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H G 4 5 2 3 H

G 4 5 2 5 H

G 4 5 2 6 H

G 4 5 2 7

Sampling Date 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/21

U n i t s R1-642-M316 R2-642-M316 RDL R3-642-M316 RDL R1-COOLING-653-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 47 44 13 23 14 210 16 2284706

Volume ml 540 520 1 570 1 620 1 2288290

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H G 4 5 2 9 H G 4 5 3 0 H G 4 5 3 1

Sampling Date 2010/09/21 2010/09/21 2010/09/21

U n i t s R2-COOLING-653-M316 RDL R3-COOLING-653-M316 RDL R1-OVEN-654-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 200 14 190 13 710 17 2284706

Volume ml 570 1 510 1 680 1 2288290

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H G 4 5 3 3 H G 4 5 3 4

Sampling Date 2010/09/21 2010/09/21

U n i t s R2-OVEN-654-M316 RDL R3-OVEN-654-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 750 16 700 15 2284706

Volume ml 640 1 590 1 2288290

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D3266 Client Project #: 10-3990.09

Report Date: 2010/10/08 Project name: JM WINDER



### MISCELLANEOUS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H G 4 4 9 4 H

G 4 4 9 4 H

G 4 4 9 6 H

G 4 4 9 7 H

G 4 4 9 8 H

G 4 5 0 0 H

G 4 5 0 1

Sampling Date 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/18 2010/09/18

U n i t s R1-641 R1-641 R2-641 R3-641 R1-642 R2-642 R3-642 RDL QC Batch

ALIQUOT ALIQUOT ALIQUOT ALIQUOT ALIQUOT ALIQUOT ALIQUOT

Lab-Dup

Methanol ug ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4 2278862

Phenol ug ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 6 2278862

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H G 4 5 0 2 H

G 4 5 0 4 H

G 4 5 0 5 H

G 4 5 0 6 H

G 4 5 0 8 H

G 4 5 0 9

Sampling Date 2010/09/21 2010/09/21 2010/09/21 2010/09/21 2010/09/21 2010/09/21

U n i t s R1-COOLING-653 R2-COOLING-653 R3-COOLING-653 R1-OVEN-654 R2-OVEN-654 R3-OVEN-654 RDL QC Batch

ALIQUOT ALIQUOT ALIQUOT ALIQUOT ALIQUOT ALIQUOT

Methanol ug ND ND ND ND ND ND 4 2278862

Phenol ug ND ND ND ND ND ND 6 2278862

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H G 6 4 9 1

Sampling Date 2010/09/21

U n i t s BLANK-DI RDL QC Batch

H20-NCASI98.01

Methanol ug ND 4 2278862

Phenol ug ND 6 2278862

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D3266 Client Project #: 10-3990.09

Report Date: 2010/10/08 Project name: JM WINDER



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HG4494 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R1-641 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4494 D u p Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R1-641 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4496 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R2-641 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4497 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R3-641 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4498 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R1-642 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4500 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R2-642 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4501 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R3-642 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Page 4 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D3266 Client Project #: 10-3990.09

Report Date: 2010/10/08 Project name: JM WINDER



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HG4502 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R1-COOLING-653 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4504 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R2-COOLING-653 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4505 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R3-COOLING-653 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4506 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R1-OVEN-654 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4508 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R2-OVEN-654 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4509 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R3-OVEN-654 ALIQUOT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Maxxam ID HG4518 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID BLANK-DI H2O-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Page 5 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D3266 Client Project #: 10-3990.09

Report Date: 2010/10/08 Project name: JM WINDER



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HG4519 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R1-641-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG4519 D u p Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R1-641-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Maxxam ID HG4521 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R2-641-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG4522 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R3-641-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG4523 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R1-642-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG4525 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R2-642-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Page 6 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D3266 Client Project #: 10-3990.09

Report Date: 2010/10/08 Project name: JM WINDER



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HG4526 Collected 2010/09/18

Sample ID R3-642-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG4527 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R1-COOLING-653-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG4529 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R2-COOLING-653-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG4530 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R3-COOLING-653-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG4531 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R1-OVEN-654-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG4533 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R2-OVEN-654-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Page 7 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D3266 Client Project #: 10-3990.09

Report Date: 2010/10/08 Project name: JM WINDER



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HG4534 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID R3-OVEN-654-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2284706 2010/10/01 2010/10/01 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2288290 N/A 2010/10/01 FMO

Maxxam ID HG6491 Collected 2010/09/21

Sample ID BLANK-DI H20-NCASI98.01 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/09/23

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2278862 N/A 2010/09/28 LTO

Page 8 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D3266 Client Project #: 10-3990.09

Report Date: 2010/10/08 Project name: JM WINDER

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HG4494-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4496-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4497-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4498-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4500-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4501-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4502-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4504-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4505-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4506-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4508-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG4509-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Sample HG6491-01: MDL's adjusted for volume received and for dilution. Volume=43 ml

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 9 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.09

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WINDER



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D3266

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2278862 LTO Matrix Spike Methanol 2010/09/28 113 % N/A

Phenol 2010/09/28 92 % N/A

Spiked Blank Methanol 2010/09/28 93 % N/A

Phenol 2010/09/28 104 % N/A

Method Blank Methanol 2010/09/28 ND, RDL=50 ug

Phenol 2010/09/28 ND, RDL=6 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Methanol 2010/09/28 NC % N/A

Phenol 2010/09/28 NC % 50

2284706 LLE Matrix Spike

(HG4519) Formaldehyde 2010/10/01 101 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Formaldehyde 2010/10/01 100 % 91

- 107

Method Blank Formaldehyde 2010/10/01 ND, RDL=5 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Formaldehyde 2010/10/01 NC % 20

N/A = Not Applicable

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 10 of 10