alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rudolph LeJEUNE, Individually, etc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The AMERICAN OIL COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 2428.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 29, 1968.

*161Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, by James Diaz, Lafayette, for defendant-third party plaintiff-appellant.

Edwards, Edwards & Broadhurst, by Nolan J. Edwards, Crowley, for plaintiff-appellee.

Mouton, Champagne & Colomb, by Wel-ton P. Mouton, Lafayette, for third party defendant-appellee.

Before TATE, FRUGÉ and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

TATE, Judge.

The plaintiff father brings suit individually and as administrator of the estate of his minor daughter to recover damages sustained when the little girl was injured while riding as guest passenger in her grandfather’s station wagon. Her grandfather was killed as a result of the same accident, when his vehicle was struck by a large truck operated by the American Oil Company. The case was consolidated for trial and appeal with a companion suit filed by the surviving spouse and children. Richard v. American Oil Co., La.App., 213 So.2d 158.

The defendants, American Oil and its driver, appeal from adverse judgment awarding the plaintiff damages. The chief issue of this appeal is American Oil’s contention, asserted by its third-party demand, that the negligence of the driver of another truck operated by the Baroid Division, National Lead Company, was a contributory cause of the accident, so that Baroid should be held to contribution for the damages recovered against American Oil.

"We reject this contention and affirm the trial court judgment, for the reasons set forth in the companion suit previously cited. The defendant-appellants are to pay the costs of this appeal.

Affirmed.
Order entered January 9, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00581
- CV
MAXIM N. MOYAL AND D ANIEL I. MOYAL, Appellant s V. SECURITY SERVICE FED ERAL CREDIT UNION, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 15059



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s January 4, 2019 opposed motion for leave to file a sur

reply brief

. Attached to the motion is appellee ’s proposed brief.
We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee to file the sur

- reply brief no later than January 14 , 2019

. We caution the parties that further briefing should not be tendered to the Court without leave first being obtained.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWEL L JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



I, Paul R. Arena, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of i2 Telecom International, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 16, 2004



/s/    Paul R. ArenaPaul R. Arena,Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
# C_2013203EN.01000302.xml

| 17.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/3

---

Special Report No 5/2013 ‘Are EU Cohesion Policy funds well spent on roads?’

2013/C 203/04

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 5/2013 ‘Are EU Cohesion Policy funds well spent on roads?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>
                                         World Airways FDS 3/31/97 - Restated
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000949240
<NAME>                                         World Airways
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollar
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.0
<CASH>                                         2,610
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,402
<ALLOWANCES>                                   413
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35,723
<PP&E>                                         66,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          68,139
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       12
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,862
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               78,748
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  72,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (250)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.45
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Gregory K. Roeper, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VodaviTechnology, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize, and report financial information ; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: April 27, 2004                                             /s/ Gregory K. Roeper   Gregory K. Roeper   Chief Executive Officer  
17
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6736

DANIEL ERIC COBBLE, a/k/a Johnathan Wayne Plemons, a/k/a Daniel Castleberry , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION EDGEFIELD , Respondent

- Appellee , and
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS , Respondent

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 6:23

- cv - 00250

- DCN )

Submitted : November 16, 2023 Decided: November 22, 2023

Before AGEE and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Daniel Eric Cobble , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6736 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Daniel Eric Cobble , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Cobble’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court ’s order

. Cobble v. Warden Edgefield Fed

. Corr. Inst ., No. 6:23

- cv - 00250

- DCN (D.S.C. July 13, 2023)

. We deny Cobble’s motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary and deny his motion to transfer motions from a prior appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6736 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2013046EN.01000101.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/1

---

2013/C 46/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 38, 9.2.2013

OJ C 38, 9.2.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 32, 2.2.2013

OJ C 26, 26.1.2013

OJ C 9, 12.1.2013

OJ C 399, 22.12.2012

OJ C 389, 15.12.2012

OJ C 379, 8.12.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
### From: Gene Robinson [ mailto:texhills@verizon.net ]

Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 4:21 PM

To: Kenney, James (FAA)

Subject: Re: Petition for exemption, docet # FAA

- 2013

- 0127

Hello Jim,

You know what they say about being a "Frontiersman". We get to catch the first spears and arrows!

In reference to my exemption request FAA

- 2013

- 0127, please consider that exemption withdrawn. It will be

superseded by the current 333 Exemption now in pro cess.

If there is anything else I can do for you concerning unmanned aircraft integration, please do not hesitate to call or

email me.

As an aside, did you ever see my book "First to Deploy

- Unmanned Aircraft for Search & Rescue and Law

Enforcement" ?

Gene

RPFlightSystems, Inc.

www.rpflightsystems.com
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-49-2018]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 18--San Jose, California; Notification 
of Proposed Production Activity; Tesla, Inc. (Electric Passenger 
Vehicles and Components); Fremont and Palo Alto, California

    Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) submitted a notification of proposed production 
activity to the FTZ Board for its facilities in Palo Alto and Fremont, 
California. The notification conforming to the requirements of the 
regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on August 1, 
2018.
    Tesla already has authority to produce electric vehicles and 
components of electric vehicles within Subzone 18G. The current request 
would add one foreign status material/component to the scope of 
authority. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), additional FTZ authority would 
be limited to the specific foreign-status material/component described 
in the submitted notification (as described below) and subsequently 
authorized by the FTZ Board.
    Production under FTZ procedures could exempt Tesla from customs 
duty payments on the foreign-status material/component used in export 
production. On its domestic sales, for the foreign-status material/
component noted below, Tesla would be able to choose the duty rates 
during customs entry procedures that apply to electric passenger 
vehicles and related components (duty-free to 3.4%). Tesla would be 
able to avoid duty on foreign-status components which become scrap/
waste. Customs duties also could possibly be deferred or reduced on 
foreign-status production equipment.
    The material/component sourced from abroad is an automotive 
navigation apparatus (electronic control unit) (duty-free).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the address 
below. The closing period for their receipt is September 24, 2018.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
Board's website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Juanita Chen at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#761c0317181f021758151e131836020417121358111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a607f6b64637e6b2469626f644a7e786b6e6f246d657c">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-482-1378.

    Dated: August 8, 2018.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17417 Filed 8-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, a municipal corporation, Appellant, v. William E. YOHAM and Sandra Jean Yoham, his wife, Appellees.

No. 73-1018.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### FIRST AMERICAN INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT CO. and Bernard H. Horowtiz, Appellants, v. Humberto SUAREZ, Appellee.

No. 73-620.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32(b)

                        Section 1350 Certification
                                  of
                           Mark E. Maddocks

     I certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dataram Corporation for
the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
information contained in the periodic report fully presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dataram
Corporation.



July 23, 2007                      MARK E. MADDOCKS
                                   ______________________________

                                   Mark E. Maddocks
                                   Vice President, Finance and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
#### Esther J. LUJAN, Appellant, v. Rolin D. LUJAN, Appellee.

No. 73-775.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Lewis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Economic Census

The Newsroom site has been redesigned and relocated.  This is the archive area.

For the most current releases please visit the redesigned newsroom at:https://www.census.gov/newsroom.html

For previous press releases please contact the Public Information Office at 301-763-3030.

### 2012

                          - December 17:   American Businesses Enter Major Phase of Economic Census
                          - November  5:   Latest Economic Indicators Through the Census Bureau's Mobile App
                          - October  4:   Media Advisory — Census Bureau Webinar to Discuss Upcoming  2012 Economic Census
                          - September 10:   Census Bureau Launches Business.census.gov Website to Promote 2012 Economic Census
                          - August 16:   New Survey of Business Owners Public Use Microdata Sample: 2007 
                          - August  6:   Infographic on America's Economy is Fourth in "How Do We Know?" Series 
                          - July  2:   Census Bureau Launches “How Do We Know?” Historical Infographic in Honor of Independence Day 

### 2011

                          - October 20:   Updated QuickFacts Tables Available from Census Bureau
                          - June  8:   Media Advisory — Census Bureau Webinar to Highlight Characteristics of Businesses and Business Owners
                          - April 28:   Census Bureau Reports the Number of Asian-Owned Businesses Increased at More Than Twice the National Rate
                          - March 28:   Quarterly Financial Report (QFR): Fourth Quarter 2010
                          - January 26:   Census Bureau Reports Steady Growth in Internet Publishing and Broadcasting Revenues

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
261 La. 528

#### Peter W. JARVI v. STATE of Louisiana, Honorable Frank Shea.

No. 52318.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 1972.

In re: Peter W. Jarvi applying for remedial writs.

Writ denied. There is no error of law in the judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the body of the accompanying Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 POUNDS STERLING
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.6650
<CASH>                                          61,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,184
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,987,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                 385,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,356,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    (1,157,841)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                   (49,607)
<COMMON>                                      (92,757)
<OTHER-SE>                                   (762,008)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (2,356,574)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (166,670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (115)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (166,785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (166,785)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Anthony F. BALZEBRE et al., Appellants, v. Kaye A. PEARSON et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1023.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 14, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 13, 1973.

Edward C. Vining, Jr. and R. M. MacArthur, Miami, for appellants.

Horton, Schwartz & Perse; Jeff D. Gautier, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the entry of a partial summary judgment on the issue of liability in favor of the defendants. Several aspects of the litigation between these parties have been before this court. See Balzebre v. 2600 Douglas, Inc., Fla.App.1972, 270 So.2d 433; Balzebre v. Pearson, Fla.App. 3rd 1973, 271 So.2d 788; Balzebre v. Pearson, Fla.App. 3rd 1973, 273 So.2d 427. The sum of these decisions is that the appellants have been determined not to have the rights they attempt to assert in the cause which was before the trial court and on which the summary judgment was entered. Therefore, upon authority of the opinions above cited, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.