alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3086

To reduce the size of the Federal civilian workforce.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 15, 1993

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. BOEHNER) introduced the

following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Post Office

and Civil Service and House Administration

A BILL

To reduce the size of the Federal civilian workforce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Government Employee

5 Limitation Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN FEDERAL CIVILIAN WORKFORCE.

7 (a) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

8 term ‘‘civilian employees in the executive branch’’ means

9 all civilian employees within the executive branch of the

10 Government (other than in the United States Postal Serv11 ice or the Postal Rate Commission).
2

•HR 3086 IH

1 (b) LIMITATIONS.—The average total number of civil2 ian employees in the executive branch may not exceed—

3 (1) 2,095,600 in fiscal year 1994;

4 (2) 2,045,200 in fiscal year 1995;

5 (3) 1,994,800 in fiscal year 1996;

6 (4) 1,994,400 in fiscal year 1997; or

7 (5) 1,894,000 in fiscal year 1998.

8 (c) AVERAGING.—The average total number of civil9 ian employees in the executive branch in a fiscal year shall,

10 for purposes of this section, be the average number in such

11 fiscal year, as determined under regulations prescribed

12 under subsection (e). Any such average shall be deter13 mined on a ‘‘full–time equivalent’’ basis.

14 (d) VOLUNTARY MEASURES.—To the extent prac15 ticable, any reductions necessary to achieve compliance

16 with any limitation under subsection (b) shall be effected

17 through attrition or other voluntary measures.

18 (e) REGULATIONS.—The President shall prescribe

19 regulations to carry out this section.

20 SEC. 3. SENSE OF THE HOUSE.

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—It is the sense of the House of

22 Representatives that appropriate measures should be

23 taken to provide that, effective beginning with the 104th

24 Congress, the maximum number of permanent positions

25 authorized for each Member under the Clerk Hire Allow-
3

•HR 3086 IH

1 ance shall not exceed the number which is 2 less than the

2 maximum number so authorized for the 103d Congress.

3 (b) DEFINITION.—For the purpose of this section,

4 the term ‘‘Member’’ means a Member of the House of

5 Representatives, a Delegate to the House of Representa6 tives, and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico.

Æ
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0589 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-189-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA-IR-M-8040.1C. DOUBLE CLICK to follow the link

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Panama source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2998

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the limitation on the

maximum amount of the estate of certain veterans without dependents

who are receiving hospital treatment or institutional or domiciliary care

from the United States before disability compensation, pension, and

certain other benefits are suspended.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. SLATTERY (by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the

limitation on the maximum amount of the estate of certain veterans without dependents who are receiving hospital treatment or institutional or domiciliary care from

the United States before disability compensation, pension, and certain other benefits are suspended.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2998 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN ESTATE SIZE LIMITATION FOR

2 CERTAIN VETERANS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5503(b)(1)(A) of title 38,

4 United States Code, is amended by striking out ‘‘$1,500’’

5 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$5,000’’.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

7 subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 1993.

Æ
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
                                   FIXED CHARGES

                                                                    Exhibit 12

                                                                   Twelve months
                                                                       ended
                                                                   December 31,
                                                                        1997
                                                                   -------------

Computation of Earnings:

Pretax income from continuing operations                                  457.0

Adjustments to income:

             Add: Distributed income from less than
                    50% owned companies                                     2.3

             Add: Portion of rent expense representative
                    of interest expense                                     6.6

             Add: Interest incurred net of amounts
                    capitalized                                           378.6

             Add: Amortization of interest previously
                    capitalized                                             3.2

             Add: Amortization of debt issue costs and discount
                    or premium on indebtedness                              2.4
                                                                        -------
             Earnings                                                     850.1
                                                                        -------

Computation of Fixed Charges:

             Interest incurred                                            384.6

             Amortization of debt issue costs and discount
                 or premium on indebtedness                                 2.4

             Portion of rental expense representative
                  of interest                                               6.6

             Preferred stock dividend requirements                         34.6
                                                                        -------
                                      Fixed Charges                       428.2
                                                                        -------

             Ratio of Earnings to  Fixed Charges                            2.0
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Governments
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.38 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2012 2007 Enterprise Statistics New statistics showing the industrial specialization and diversification of U.S. businesses are now available from the Census Bureau's Enterprise Statistics Program. In developing a complete series of reports to be published with the 2012 Economic Census results, Census Bureau researchers have created an Enterprise Classification System and prototype tables based on the 2007 Business Register. The statistics provide a new perspective for the analysis of enterprises, businesses and their establishments under common ownership or control. The 2007 tables and more information about the Enterprise Statistics Program are available at <https://www.census.gov/econ/esp>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Figure 1.

Percentage With Disability for Population Aged 90 and Over by 

Living Arrangement and Type of Disability: 2008 

(Data based on sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and

definitions, see www.census.gov/acs/www)

Note: “Institutionalized” includes population aged 90 and over living in institutional group quarters such as nursing 

facilities/skilled-nursing facilities. 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2008.

40.5

24.3

72.8

80.8

98.2

44.1

29.4

89.2

30.5

94.0

85.2

59.8

34.6

60.2

Noninstitutionalized Institutionalized

Difficulty 

doing 

errands 

alone

Difficulty 

dressing/

bathing

Difficulty 

walking/

climbing 

stairs

Difficulty 

remembering/ 

concentrating/ 

making decisions

Difficulty 

seeing

Difficulty 

hearing

With any 

disability
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.28 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 Spanish-Language Version of American FactFinder http://factfinder2.census.gov/bkmk/navigation/1.0/es/d_dataset:DEC_10_PL **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the annual report of DataMetrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending October 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Rafik
Moursalien, Controller of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

DATAMETRICS CORPORATION


By:    /s/ Rafik Moursalien
       ------------------------------
       Rafik Moursalien, CFO
Dated: July 6, 2006
#### Reuben W. CARLTON, Mrs. Margaret Carlton, Wayne Carlton, Mrs. Margaret Talbot, and Ru-Mar, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellants, v. The FLORIDA CITRUS COMMISSION, an Administrative agency of the State of Florida, and the Indian River Citrus League, a non-profit grower owned and grower controlled citrus fruit cooperative association in the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 76-1424.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 28, 1978.

Charles H. Damsel, Jr. and-Marjorie D. Gadarian of Jones, Paine & Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Harry 0. Thomas and Robert P. Murray of Holland & Knight, Tampa, and Monterey Campbell of Dunlap, Coward & Blakeman, Bartow, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

In the trial court, the appellants, Reuben W. Carlton, Mrs. Margaret Carlton, Wayne Carlton, Mrs. Margaret Talbot, and Ru-Mar, Inc., sought to enjoin the appellee, The Florida Citrus Commission, from enforcing its regulations which prohibit the appellants from marketing their citrus fruit as “Indian River” fruit. The appellants sought the injunction on grounds similar to those successfully asserted by the grove owner in *Florida Citrus Commission v. Owens,*239 So.2d 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). However, the trial court, as the trier of facts, found that appellants did not meet the requirements for injunctive relief set out in *Florida Citrus Commission v. Owens,*supra, and denied appellants’ petition. We believe *1294there is an adequate basis in the record to support the findings of the trial court. Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ„ and DAKAN, STEPHEN LEE, Associate Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT (21)
<TABLE>

        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF APRIL 9, 1998

<CAPTION>
                                     STATE/PROVINCE   COUNTRY
                                     -------------- ------------ 
<S>                                      <C>        <C>         

CPI Corp.                                Delaware   United States

  Consumer Programs Holding, Inc.        Delaware   United States

    Consumer Programs, Incorporated      Missouri   United States
      d/b/a Sears Portrait Studios
        CPI Images L.L.C.                Missouri   United States
          d/b/a Sears Portrait Studios
          d/b/a Mainstreet Portraits

        CPI Management Services L.L.C.   Missouri   United States

        CPI Properties L.L.C.            Missouri   United States

        Consumer Programs Partner,Inc.   Delaware   United States

    CPI Research and Development, Inc.   Delaware   United States

    CPI Prints Plus, Inc.                Delaware   United States

        Ridgedale Prints Plus, Inc.      Minnesota  United States
          d/b/a Prints Plus

            Prints Plus, Inc.            California United States
              d/b/a Prints Plus
              d/b/a Prints & Posters

    CPI Technology Corp.                 Missouri   United States

CPI Corp. Canada                         Ontario    Canada      

  d/b/a Sears Portrait Studios

</TABLE>

                              33
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases News Conferences
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				News Releases
 				**Press Kits**
 				Tip Sheets
 Webinar to Discuss 1940 Census Records Release **March 29, 2012 - 1:00 p.m. EDT**  **Audio conference -- access information**
    Toll free number: 888-913-9972
    Participant passcode: 1940CENSUS**Note: Stay on the line until operator asks for the passcode. Do not key in passcode.** **Online presentation -- access information
    Please login early, as some setup is required.**
    URL: <https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/>
    Conference/meeting number: PW7478285
    Conference/meeting passcode: 1940CENSUS **Presentation Slides** [PDF] **Media Advisory:** Census Bureau Webinar to Discuss 1940 Census Records Released **Speakers:** David Pemberton, historian, History Staff/Administrative and Customer Services
      Division, U.S. Census BureauConstance Potter, archivist, National Archives and Records AdministrationRebecca Warlow, Supervisor, Digitization and
Description in the Open Government Division of Information Services **Resources:**1940 Census Interactive Web page
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         4,887,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,117,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (401,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,897,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10,208,000
<PP&E>                                         3,540,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (2,331,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11,466,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,299,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      21,464,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (13,297,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11,466,000
<SALES>                                        3,037,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,037,000
<CGS>                                          1,363,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,321,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                40,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (571,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (576,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (576,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Node.Js Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 25, 2018, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Node.js Foundation (``Node.js 
Foundation'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, SAP SE, Waldorf, GERMANY, has withdrawn as a party to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Node.js Foundation intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On August 17, 2015, Node.js filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on September 28, 2015 (80 FR 58297).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 6, 
2018. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on May 4, 2018 (83 FR 19836).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-17277 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P