alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,717,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  419,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,136,392
<PP&E>                                      21,977,118
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,927,070)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,186,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          590,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,596,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,186,440
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,067,625
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               705,444
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                362,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            362,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   362,181
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 05/05-0288 issued to Stonehenge Opportunity Fund II, LP, said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Dated: April 6, 2018.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2018-17578 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
[ PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 13005

____________________ DONALD J. TRUMP, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 9:22

- cv
- 81294

- AMC

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-13005 Date Filed: 12/01/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Order of the Court 22

- 13005
Before W ILLIAM P RYOR , Chief Judge, G RANT , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Absent a stay or withholding of the mandate in the appeal towhich this order is appended, the clerk is directed to issue the mandate after seven (7) days of the date of this opinion. Consistent with Eleventh Circuit Rule 41

- 2, the clerk is directed to provide the active members of this Court with notice of the issuance of this opinion and our direction to expedite issuance of the mandate. SO ORDERED

. USCA11 Case: 22-13005 Date Filed: 12/01/2022 Page: 2 of 2
#### Varis BARENIS v. Joseph GERANCE, the Administrator, Dept. of Employment Security, a Div. of the Dept. of Labor of the State of Louisiana, et al.

No. 62400.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Varis Barenis applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, in the Court of Appeal First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 357 So.2d 892.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant the writ.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases American Community Survey (ACS)
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information REVISED CB12-92 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, MAY 21, 2012 REVISED WEBINAR ACCESS INFORMATION: Media Advisory — Census Bureau to Host Embargo-Period Technical Webinar on New American Community Survey Race, Tribal, Hispanic and Ancestry Group Data Sets What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau will hold an embargo-period technical webinar on two new American Community Survey data sets: **The 2006-2010 American Community Survey Selected Population Tables.****The 2006-2010 American Community Survey American Indian and Alaska Native Tables.** This is the first time this level of statistical detail has been available for groups since Census 2000. The data sets compile five years of data to produce detailed estimates at multiple levels of geography for hundreds of race, Hispanic origin, ancestry and tribal groups. The webinar will also include a brief tutorial to show data users how to access the new data sets in American FactFinder, including new features designed to facilitate searches. The event will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. Reporters will be able to ask questions once the presentation is complete. We suggest reporters log in and call in early.
 When:
 Tuesday, May 22, 2 p.m. (EDT)
 Who:
 Roberto Ramirez, chief, Ethnicity and Ancestry Branch, Population Division
Nicholas Jones, chief, Racial Statistics Branch, Population Division
Jackie Mommsen, American FactFinder
 Details:
 **Audio conference — access information******The webinar is accessible to current embargo holders only; revised access information will be posted in the Census Bureau embargo page prior to the start of the event.**** **Info: <https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/special_data_release/>**
  Follow @uscensusbureau on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and Ustream
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00290-CV

In the Interest of S.R.B., a Child

On appeal from the

430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-4327-17-J

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The Court 

orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION in accordance with its 

opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 2, 2018
Opinion filed June 4 , 2021



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _____


### No. 11

- 20

- 00 223

- C V

_____ _ _____ 

### QUAD A, INC. , Appellant

V.
THE G & M HARRIS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, L.P., GARY HARRIS, MARY HARRIS, AND CJ REAL ESTATE, LLC , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 70 th District Court

Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. A

- 20

- 06

- 0626

- CV

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The parties to this appeal have filed in this court a n agreed motion to di smis s
this appeal. In the motion, the parties state that they have settled the case a nd that
all parties have agreed to bear their own costs

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a) , (d)

. Accordingly, we dismiss th is appeal pursuant to the parties’ agreed motion

.2

The motion to dismiss is granted, and th e appeal is dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

June 4 , 202 1

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter , J., and W ill iams , J.
#### Jerotha Calvin HARDEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-415.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 8, 1972.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and W. E. Whitlock, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Hines v. State (Fla.App.1966) 186 So.2d 820, quashed by State v. Hines (Fla.1967) 195 So.2d 550; Odom v. State (Fla.1959) 109 So.2d 163.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 67 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-61554) and Amendment No. 526 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
#### Arthur B. CUNNINGHAM and Philip T. Weinstein, Appellants, v. HOLLYWOOD FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, a corporation under the laws of the United States of America, et al., Appellees.

No. 434.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 28, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Lamar Warren, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40903 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HECTOR GARCIA-CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-193-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hector Garcia-Camacho appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Camacho contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a), his judgment must be reformed to reflect a conviction only underNo. 03-40903 -2- that provision, and his sentence must be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment and one year of supervised release.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Garcia-Camacho acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Walter QUINN and Earl Batteau.

No. 53555.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 14, 1974.

J. David McNeill, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

*606William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Garrison, Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

MARCUS, Justice.

These defendants, Walter Quinn and Earl Batteau, were indicted by the Grand Jury for the Parish of Orleans for the crime of rape. They were jointly tried, convicted and sentenced to death. An appeal was taken to this Court, and, although several bills of exceptions were reserved ..during the trial, none of these bills so reserved were perfected.

Our review is thus limited to errors discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence. Article 920 Code of Criminal Procedure; State v. Lucas McCurady, 286 So.2d 638 on the docket of this Court handed down on December 3, 1973, and the cases therein cited.

One such error is patent on the face of the record. The sentence herein was imposed on the same date the motion for a new trial was denied. No waiver of the mandatory statutory delay provided for in Article 873 Code of Criminal Procedure is to be found in the minutes of court. This patent error requires a remand. State v. Hampton, 274 So.2d 383 (La.1973); State v. Augustine, 263 La. 977, 270 So.2d 118 (1972); State v. Douglas, 250 La. 480, 196 So.2d 799 (1967).

We also take note of the fact that the death penalty imposed upon these defendants must be set aside. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972). The imposition of a sentence, other than death, is required. See State v. Franklin, 263 La. 344, 268 So.2d 249 (1972).

Accordingly, for the reasons assigned, the conviction of the defendants is affirmed, but the death sentence so imposed is annulled and set aside, and the case is remanded to the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, Section “C”, with instructions to the trial judge to sentence the defendants, Walter Quinn and Earl Batteau, to life imprisonment.
Exhibit 4 to Annual
                                                             Report On Form 10-K
                                                              For the Year Ended
                                                               December 31, 1996

                                   April 22, 1996

Mr. William McMenemy
c/o Del Laboratories, Inc.
565 Broad Hollow Road
Farmingdale, New York  11735

Dear Mr. McMenemy:

            This will confirm that your Employment Agreement, as amended and
extended, is further extended to March 31, 2001.

            In all other respects the Employment Agreement, as amended and
extended, shall continue in full force and effect. Other changes to the
Employment Agreement may be made at a later date.

            Please signify your agreement with the foregoing by counter-signing
the copy of this letter and returning it to me.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        DEL LABORATORIES, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Dan K. Wassong
                                            ---------------------
                                            Dan K. Wassong
                                            Chairman of the Board

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


/s/ William McMenemy
--------------------
William McMenemy
# C_2013265EN.01000901.xml

| 14.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 September 2013

2013/C 265/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3295 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4573 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83990 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7048 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2376 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8695 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,775 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 300,54 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7024 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2120 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4671 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6955 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4380 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3739 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3091 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6323 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6866 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 444,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2467 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1349 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5828 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 921,54 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3760 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,282 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,3445 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,362 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0308 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4178 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,5300 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3295

JPY

Japanese yen

132,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4573

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83990

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7048

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2376

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8695

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,775

HUF

Hungarian forint

300,54

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7024

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2120

RON

Romanian leu

4,4671

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6955

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4380

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3739

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3091

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6323

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6866

KRW

South Korean won

1 444,97

ZAR

South African rand

13,2467

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1349

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5828

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 921,54

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3760

PHP

Philippine peso

58,282

RUB

Russian rouble

43,3445

THB

Thai baht

42,362

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0308

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4178

INR

Indian rupee

84,5300

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 59 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-63505) and Amendment No. 432 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 10, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          69,753
<SECURITIES>                                     3,586
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                       457
<INVENTORY>                                     29,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,743
<PP&E>                                         116,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 322,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,276
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           234
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   322,350
<SALES>                                        531,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               539,225
<CGS>                                          451,913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  451,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    241
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (433)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                674
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       674
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
No. 11400.

#### The Lake Erie & Western Railroad Co. *v.*Kayser.

Decided December 14, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Mr. John B. Cockrum; Messrs. Richie & Richie*and *Mr. W. JJ. I^eete,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. McKenzie & Weadock,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear,- Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.