alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**808 CA 11-01863**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

MARCIA G. BRYNDLE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH J. KNAB, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND THOMAS E. KNAPP, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL R. ARCHILLA, BUFFALO (DANIEL J. GURASCI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM K. MATTAR, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (APRIL J. ORLOWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (AMANDA L. MACHACEK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered April 18, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendant Thomas E. Knapp for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the complaint against him.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she allegedly sustained when the vehicle driven by defendant Joseph J. Knab rear-ended the vehicle driven by plaintiff, causing plaintiff’s vehicle to make contact with the vehicle driven by defendant Thomas E. Knapp. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was attempting to turn into a driveway that served as the entrance and exit to a parking lot. Knapp was attempting to exit the parking lot using the same driveway. According to plaintiff, she was unable to turn into the driveway because Knapp’s vehicle was in the center of the driveway, whereupon the vehicle driven by Knab rear-ended plaintiff’s vehicle while plaintiff was either coasting or had fully stopped.

We conclude that Supreme Court properly granted the motion of Knapp for summary judgment seeking, inter alia, dismissal of the complaint against him, but our reasoning differs from that of the court. Knapp established as a matter of law that he was not negligent, and both plaintiff and Knab failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see generally Zuckerman v City of New York , 49 NY2d 557,**-2- 808 CA 11-01863** 
562). “The fact that [Knapp] positioned his motor vehicle in the middle of the driveway does not raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the accident was caused by negligence on his part” ( Bous v Fahey , 250 AD2d 638).

Entered: June 29, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1258 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-184-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspect 2.5 $ 212.50 $0 $ 212.50 232 $49,300.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $49,300

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Rework 1.0 $ 85.00 $8 $ 93.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2024

NO. 03-22-00710-CR

Marcus Johannsan Mitchell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-85907, 33-56965, 333-16869 and 333-04971) and
in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-67175, 333-67173,
333-25837, 33-45900, 33-39529, 33-63732, 33-61240, 33-50369 and 33-52699) of
Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. of our report dated March 20, 2000 relating to
the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this
Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2000
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1941 

To establish requirements for the adoption of any new or revised requirement 

providing for the screening, testing, or treatment of an airman or an 

air traffic controller for a sleep disorder, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2014 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BEGICH, and Mr. JOHANNS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To establish requirements for the adoption of any new or 

revised requirement providing for the screening, testing, 

or treatment of an airman or an air traffic controller 

for a sleep disorder, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MEDICAL CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR 

4 AIRMEN AND AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS 

5 RELATING TO SLEEP DISORDERS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation 

7 may, consistent with accepted medical standards and prac8 tices, implement or enforce a requirement providing for 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1941 IS

1 the screening, testing, or treatment (including consider2 ation of all possible treatment alternatives) of an airman 

3 or an air traffic controller for a sleep disorder— 

4 (1) in the case of an airman, only if the re5 quirement is adopted pursuant to a rulemaking pro6 ceeding; and 

7 (2) in the case of an air traffic controller, only 

8 if the Federal Aviation Administration meets its ob9 ligations pursuant to chapter 71 of title 5, United 

10 States Code. 

11 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall not apply 

12 to a requirement that was in force before November 1, 

13 2013. 

14 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi15 nitions apply: 

16 (1) AIRMAN.—The term ‘‘airman’’ has the 

17 meaning given that term in section 40102(a) of title 

18 49, United States Code. 

19 (2) AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER.—The term ‘‘air 

20 traffic controller’’ means a civilian employee of the 

21 Department of Transportation described in section 

22 2109 of title 5, United States Code. 

23 (3) SLEEP DISORDER.—The term ‘‘sleep dis24 order’’ includes obstructive sleep apnea. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 11396.

#### The Phoenix Insurance Co. *v.*Petrie.

Decided December 14, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Mercer county.

*Mr. D. W. Bowman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Ford & Raudabaugh,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J;, Summers, Spear and Price, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.2




                    Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment
Number 6 to Registration Statement Number 2-54429 on Form S-8, Post-
Effective Amendment Number 9 to Registration Statement Number 2-42388 on
Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-23709 on Form S-8, Registration
Statement Number 33-23710 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-
54176 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-64729 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement Number 33-64731 on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement Number 333-42915 on Form S-8, of our report dated January 30,
1996, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
A.T.Cross Company as of December 31, 1995, and for the year then ended,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1997.



                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Providence, Rhode Island
March 23, 1998
256 La. 888

#### Dave L. PEARCE, Commissioner of Louisiana Department of Agriculture, ex rel. LIVESTOCK SANITARY BOARD v. Carl GUNTER.

No. 50894.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1970.

In re: Dave L. Pearce, Commissioner of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 221 So.2d 599; 238 So.2d 534.

Application not considered. The application was filed too late. See Article VII, Section 11 of the Louisiana Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3001 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3001

To amend section 110 of title 38, United States Code, to liberalize the 
 standard for preservation of disability evaluations for compensation 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 1993

  Mr. Slattery (by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 110 of title 38, United States Code, to liberalize the 
 standard for preservation of disability evaluations for compensation 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 110 of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out ``compensation, pension,'' in the first 
        sentence and inserting in lieu thereof ``pension''; and
            (2) by striking out ``twenty'' in the second sentence and 
        inserting in lieu thereof ``fifteen''.

                                 <all>
```
#### T. H. SIMS, Individually and d/b/a Sims Crane Service, Inc., Petitioner, v. TAMPA UNIFORM SERVICE, INC., etc., Respondent.

No. 43694.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 29, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 274 So.2d 272.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.13 **Contact:**  Lisa Cochrane
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, FEB. 1, 2010 Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to Super Bowl XLIV in Miami Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why "I count!" and view messages from other road tour participants.
    
 For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Mandeep K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Mandeep K. Taneja                
|                      |  |  |  | Mandeep K. Taneja                    
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Joseph C. Sharpe Jr.

### Director, National Economic Commission the American Legion

Joseph C. Sharpe Jr. was appointed to the position of Director of the Economic Division in April 2009. Prior to serving as Director, he served as Deputy Director of the Economic Division, Health Care Field Representative and Assistant Director of the Veterans Affairs and Rehabilitation Commission.

He is a graduate of The Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, DC, where he earned a M.A. in International Relations and Economics. He also has two Graduate Certificates in International Business and Trade and Health Care Management from Georgetown University. Joseph also earned his B.A. in Sociology from the University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

In 1982, he entered the United States Army. After completing initial training at Ft. Sill, OK, and Ft. Sam Houston, TX, he served as a Drug and Alcohol Counselor with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea. He also served as a Mental Health Counselor in Ft. Benning, GA, worked as a Behavioral Science Research Specialist at the Walter Reed Institute of Research, Heidelberg, Germany, and was appointed as the Non Commissioned Officer in Charge of Inpatient Social Work and Psychiatry Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, in Washington, DC. In addition to his active duty service, Joseph is currently serving with the 354th Civil Affairs Brigade, U.S. Army Reserve, Riverdale, MD, as the Non Commissioned Officer in Charge of the Brigades Economics and Commerce Team.

During his military service with the Army Reserve Sergeant First Class Sharpe was deployed twice overseas, in Operation Joint Forge, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and recently for the Global War on Terrorism, in which he received the Bronze Star Medal for work completed in the restoration and improvement of public and private financial institutions and banking services in Iraq.

Originally from Chicago, Illinois, he and his family currently reside in Bristow, Virginia.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
260 La. 131

#### FIREMAN’S FUND AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANIES v. T. E. MILSTID d/b/a C & M Contracting Co., et al.

No. 51940.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1971.

In re: Louisiana Concrete Products, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 253 So. 2d 571.

Writ denied. The result is correct. In Electrical Supply Co. v. Eugene Freeman, Inc., 178 La. 741, 152 So. 510, the contract and bond were recorded as required by R.S. 9:4802 (then Act No. 298 of 1926), and that bond was statutory. R.S. 9:4812 applies to private works both when there is no contract and when the contract is unrecorded as in the instant case.
261 La. 531

#### Dan A. RITCHEY, Jr. v. C. P. HILLIARD et al.

No. 52325.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 1972.

In re: C. P. Hilliard and Frank R. Bailey, Jr. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 257 So.2d 811.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
21 APRIL 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street

Suite 354

Tyler, TX 75702

Re: Walter Royer v. State

12-14-00074-CR

12-14-00075-CR

Ms. Lusk:

Attached, please find a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding the opinion issued by the 

Court and the right to file a PDR.

If there is anything else I need to do, please let me know. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson

27 MARCH 2015

Mr. Lee Vincent

Inmate: 01978797

Gurney Unit

1385 FM 3328

Palestine, TX 75803 

Re: Opinion

 

Mr. Vincent

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Twelfth Court of Appeals in your case. The 

Court has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary 

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your 

petition prior to the expiration of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion. That is by, 24 

April 2015. 

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know. 

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
# C_2012031EN.01000501.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 February 2012

2012/C 31/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3160 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4333 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83220 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8480 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2050 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6440 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,064 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 291,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6999 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1932 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3485 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3112 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2311 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3189 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2068 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5829 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6401 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 470,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0272 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3042 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5843 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 805,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9616 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,986 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8093 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,638 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2706 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8909 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,2270 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3160

JPY

Japanese yen

100,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4333

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83220

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8480

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2050

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6440

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,064

HUF

Hungarian forint

291,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6999

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1932

RON

Romanian leu

4,3485

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3112

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2311

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3189

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2068

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5829

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6401

KRW

South Korean won

1 470,78

ZAR

South African rand

10,0272

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3042

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5843

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 805,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9616

PHP

Philippine peso

55,986

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8093

THB

Thai baht

40,638

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2706

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8909

INR

Indian rupee

64,2270

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---