alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                  Exhibit 11

                          Statement on Computation of
                               Per Share Earnings

                 (dollars in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                Years Ended January 31,
                                        -----------------------------------
                                            1997          1996       1995
                                        -----------    ----------  --------
<S>                                     <C>            <C>         <C>
Weighted average common
  shares outstanding
  during the year                            2,076       1,862       1,758
Effect of dilutive stock
  options; net of shares
  assumed repurchased at
  average market                               -           -           113
                                          --------    --------    --------
Weighted average common
  share and common
  share equivalents                          2,076       1,862       1,871
                                          ========    ========    ========

Net Loss as reported                      $(16,693)   $(13,424)   $(73,792)
                                          ========    ========    ========

Adjustment for dilative effect
  of subsidiary stock options               (1,422)     (1,249)       (244)
                                          --------    --------    --------
Net (Loss) Income Per Earnings
  Per Share Calculation                   $(18,115)   $(14,673)   $(74,036)
                                          ========    ========    ========

Earnings per share:

Net Loss as reported                      $  (8.73)   $  (7.88)   $ (39.57)
                                          ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>

(1) Not dilutive.

See Note _ to the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding the earnings per
share calculation.
261 La. 540

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Captain Joseph Young WILLIAMS, III.

No. 52352.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 1972.

In re: Captain Joseph Young Williams, III applying for writ of prohibition, cer-tiorari and mandamus with stay order.

Writ refused. The application is premature in consideration of the trial judge’s return and subsequent action in this matter. Relator’s rights are fully reserved to reapply should an adverse judgment be ultimately rendered against him.
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-1461

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

MITCHELL MCGUIRE,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Lipez, Selya and Howard, Circuit Judges.

Mitchell McGuire on brief pro se.

Renée M. Bunker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Paula D.

Silsby, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

January 14, 2009
Amendment 706, effective November 1, 2007, reduced the base 1

offense levels for crack offenses by two levels. Amendment 713,

effective March 3, 2008, made amendment 706 retroactive.

-2-

Per Curiam. This is defendant Mitchell McGuire's pro se

appeal from the district court's denial of a sentence reduction

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 and the recently amended crack guidelines.1

The only argument that defendant makes on appeal is that the

district court denied him due process by treating his motion for

appointment of counsel as a motion for a sentence reduction and

denying it as such.

We need not consider the merits of that due-process

argument because any error in denying a reduction without first

giving defendant an opportunity to be heard was harmless; it is

clear that the reduction would have been correctly denied in any

event. United States v. Ganun, 547 F.3d 46, 47 (1st Cir. 2008)

(per curiam). As recognized by the district court, defendant was

statutorily ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) because his guideline range was based on the career

offender guideline rather than the crack guideline and therefore

was not "based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been

lowered" by the recent crack cocaine amendments. United States v.

Ayala-Pizarro, 2008 WL 5338459, at *1 (1st Cir. Dec. 23, 2008);

United States v. Caraballo, 2008 WL 5274853, at *5 (1st Cir. Dec.

22, 2008).
-3-

Accordingly, the district court's order denying a

sentence reduction is affirmed.
#### CARLYLE HOUSE, INC., Appellant, v. Bernard WEISINGER and Bettle Weisinger, his wife, Appellees.

No. 72-450.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 2, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Hearing Requirements 

At Least 30 day notice prior to hearing date 

Notice given in promenant advertisement with dates, times and place of 

hearing(s) 

Plan available for review 

Notification of Regional Administrator through Region 

Notification to each Air Pollution Control Agency which will be significantly 

impacted 

Notification to the State 

For AQMA Plans, Notification to; 

a) Affected local Governments 

b) Planning Agencies 

c) Transportation Agencies 

d) Environmental control Agencies 

e) Economic Development Agencies 

f) Other affected states 

Maintain a record of the hearing with list of witnesses and text of 

presentations 

Submit with the TIP, certification that the hearing was held in accordance 

with the notice.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 2, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00621

- CV

Donald LEMPAR

, Appellant

v.

Patrick BALLANTYNE , Cynthia Orr, Goldstein & Orr, PLLC, Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CI05174 Honorable Angelica Jimenez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’ s motion for an extension of time to file his reply brief in response to Appellee Ballantyne’s brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief is due on or before February 15, 2023

.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of February, 2023

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### JUNONIA PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, and William O. Bancroft, jointly and severally, Appellants, v. LEASE MOTOR VEHICLE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-846.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 29, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                      TELTECH RESOURCE NETWORK CORPORATION

                   PROXY FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

                               SEPTEMBER 8, 2000

    The undersigned hereby appoints Jack Johnson and Andrew L. Michuda, and each
of them, with full power of substitution, as Proxies to represent and vote, as
designated below, all shares of stock of Teltech Resource Network Corporation
(the "Company") registered in the name of the undersigned at the Special Meeting
of Shareholders of the Company to be held at the offices of the Company, 2850
Metro Drive, Seminar Room 108, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55425, on September 8,
2000, at 8:00 a.m. local time, and at any adjournment thereof.

        THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL #1 BELOW.

1.  Approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization
    ("Agreement"), dated as of January 21, 2000 and amended April 28, 2000 and
    July 31, 2000, among Sopheon plc, Sopheon Corporation, a wholly owned
    subsidiary of Sopheon plc, and the Company, and the Plan of Merger included
    therein, providing for the merger of the Company with and into Sopheon
    Corporation.

            / /  FOR            / /  AGAINST            / /  ABSTAIN

                          (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
<PAGE>
2.  OTHER MATTERS. In their discretion, the Proxies are, or either of them is:

                / /  AUTHORIZED               / /  NOT AUTHORIZED

    to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Meeting.

    THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO
DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSAL 1, AND WILL BE DEEMED TO GRANT
AUTHORITY UNDER PROPOSAL 2.

    This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors

                                              Dated ____________________________

                                              __________________________________

                                              __________________________________

                                              PLEASE DATE AND SIGN ABOVE exactly
                                              as name(s) are shown on the stock
                                              certificate(s). Indicate, where
                                              appropriate, official position or
                                              representative capacity. For stock
                                              held in joint tenancy, each joint
                                              owner must sign.
#### BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF COLLIER COUNTY, Florida, a public authority, for the use and benefit of Naples Builders Supply Co., Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Connecticut, Respondent.

No. 35812.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 26, 1967.

Walters, Moore & Costanzo and Arthur D. Deckelman, Miami, for petitioners.

Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt and Julian D. Clarkson, Fort Myers, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari was issued to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in this case appearing at 190 So.2d 32. The history, factual background, questions presented and disposition are clearly set out in the opinion of the District Court. Argument having been heard and the court having considered the record and briefs, it is our opinion that the ruling of the District Court is correct and it is adopted as the opinion of this court.

The writ of certiorari is therefore discharged.

THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

THOMAS, J., dissents.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2101

_____________________________

DENIS ANDRE PARENT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Leandra G. Johnson, Judge.

April 22, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and BILBREY and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Denis Andre Parent, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Miranda L. Butson, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### William R. URQUHART, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42333.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 27, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 535.

ROBERTS, C. J, and CARLTON, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ, concur.

ERVIN, J, dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15624 and #15625; California Disaster Number CA-
00292]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of California

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of California (FEMA-
4382-DR), dated 08/04/2018.
    Incident: Wildfires and High Winds.
    Incident Period: 07/23/2018 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 08/04/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/03/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/06/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/04/2018, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Shasta.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 156245 
and for economic injury is 156250.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-17265 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1981 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1981

  To provide that the rules of the Federal Communications Commission 
    relating to preserving the open Internet and broadband industry 
     practices shall be restored to effect until the date when the 
  Commission takes final action in the proceedings on such rules that 
 were remanded to the Commission by the United States Court of Appeals 
                 for the District of Columbia Circuit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2014

 Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 
  Franken, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Merkley) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that the rules of the Federal Communications Commission 
    relating to preserving the open Internet and broadband industry 
     practices shall be restored to effect until the date when the 
  Commission takes final action in the proceedings on such rules that 
 were remanded to the Commission by the United States Court of Appeals 
                 for the District of Columbia Circuit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Open Internet Preservation Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF OPEN INTERNET RULES DURING REMANDED PROCEEDINGS.

    (a) In General.--The rules adopted by the Federal Communications 
Commission in the Report and Order in the matter of preserving the open 
Internet and broadband industry practices (FCC 10-201; adopted on 
December 21, 2010) that were vacated by the United States Court of 
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Verizon v. Federal 
Communications Commission (No. 11-1355; decided on January 14, 2014) 
shall be restored to effect during the period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act and ending on the date when the Commission 
takes final action in the proceedings remanded to the Commission in 
that decision.
    (b) Adjudication Authority.--After the end of the period described 
in subsection (a), the Federal Communications Commission may continue 
to adjudicate cases regarding violations of the rules described in such 
subsection that occurred during such period.
                                 <all>
```
#### Roger H. HARPER, Relator, v. L. Clayton NANCE, Respondent.

No. 1655.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1967.

Prohibition denied.
#### Robert WEBSTER, E. S. King, E. B. King, individually and on behalf of the citizens, residents and taxpayers in that area known as the North Orange Memorial Hospital Tax District, Appellants, v. James MAHAFFEY, Myrtle Rogers Womble, M. M. Hooper, Walter Sheppard, Elizabeth Grossenbacher, Audrey Friederich, S. S. Sadler, Jr., individually and in their official capacity as the Board of Trustees of North Orange Memorial Hospital Tax District, Ford S. Hausman, as Tax Assessor of Orange County, Florida, Earl K. Wood, as Tax Collector for Orange County, Florida, and Fred O. Dickinson, Jr., Comptroller of the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 1954.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 25, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1969.

Johnie A. McLeod, Apopka, for appellants.

*925William G. Mitchell, of Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Lanier v. Bronson, Fla.App. 1968, 215 So.2d 776; Dade County v. Eastern Air Lines, Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 13; Board of Public Instruction of Hendry County v. State, ex rel. Hilliard, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 337.

WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., and VANN, HAROLD, Associate Judge, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
December 31, 1999 consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements
of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the twelve-month period
ended 12/31/99 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                          6,201
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 133,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    6,002
<INVENTORY>                                                   168,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              335,528
<PP&E>                                                      3,739,390
<DEPRECIATION>                                              1,185,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              3,526,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         311,260
<BONDS>                                                       802,000
<COMMON>                                                       91,141
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  1,354,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                3,526,173
<SALES>                                                     1,838,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            1,838,795
<CGS>                                                       1,572,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               1,572,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             82,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               110,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   44,051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            66,076
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   66,076
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     .73


</TABLE>
# C_2013339EN.01000301.xml

| 20.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7046 — Parkwind/Summit renewable Energy Belwind 1/Belwind)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 339/02

On 11 November 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7046. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7046. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
# C_2013336EN.01000202.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/2

---

Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of three Judges

2013/C 336/03

At a meeting on 1 October 2013, the Judges of the Court of Justice elected, pursuant to the Article 12(2) of the Rules of Procedure, Mr Borg Barthet as President of the Sixth Chamber, Ms Da Cruz Vilaça as President of the Seventh Chamber, Mr Fernlund as President of the Eighth Chamber, Mr Safjan as President of the Ninth Chamber and Mr Juhász as President of the Tenth Chamber for the period from 8 October 2013 to 6 October 2014.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY SUTTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 132 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
#### Ruby Light LEONARD, Appellant, v. Ernestine McSORLEY, Appellee.

No. 67-39.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 1, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.