alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 16, 2018.

PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing Room 10800.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Jackson, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 9, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17473 Filed 8-9-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          63,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,811
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,328
<PP&E>                                          73,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,826
<BONDS>                                          6,748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           563
<OTHER-SE>                                     176,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,878
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,353
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,042)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,581)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,461)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
# AC **C CPI Saf** **et y**  **& Health Tr** **aining Thr** **ough July 2012** 

**June 2012 July 2012**  **To tal Through**  **July 2012** 

Job Description Fully Complete Fully Complete Fully Complete In Progress Instructor Online Instructor Online Instructor Online Started, not finished Applicator 0 85 9 94 182 1163 626 Helper 0 10 0 0 29 183 92



## Te **st Scor** **es thr** **ough July**  **2012 100%**  **90 -**  **99% 70**  **- 89%**  Pe rcent achieving test scores 48% 40% 12% Helper 0 10 0 0 29 183 92 Other 0 26 2 19 198 1201 602 Supervisor 0 39 19 28 298 670 486 To tal **0 160**  **30 141**  **703 3217**  **1806** 

## To **tal Students Fully Completed Thr** **ough July**  **2012 To**  **tal Students Started**  **or Finished Thr** **ough July 2012**  **3920 5726**
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: July 20, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-0320 

GLOBAL ARMS AND AMMUNITION 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2012NM710034 

Respondent 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On June 27, 2016, an Order Setting a Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and 

Directing the Parties to Confer and File a Rule 26(f) Proposed Discovery Plan was filed. 

On July 19, 2016, the Respondent, Global Arms and Ammunition, filed a Notice of 

Settlement and Appeal Withdrawal, stating that the parties had settled the issues in the case, and 

that the Respondent was withdrawing its appeal. 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The September 1, 2016 deadline for the parties to file a joint scheduling/discovery plan is 

cancelled. 

2. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for September. 8, 2016, is cancelled 

3. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, 

and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
Docket No. F AA-2014-0320 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Mr. Kyle Lomazow 

Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave., S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAJ(: 425-227-1007 

Mr. Vincent Williams 

Respondent's Representative 

Global Arms and Ammunition 

501 South Jackson St., Suite 305 

Seattle, W A 98104 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

F AJ(: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

Mr. David Carl Williams, President 

Global Arms and Ammunition, Respondent 

28 -37th Street N.E., Suite A 

Auburn, W A 98002 

TEL: 206-325-9400 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Geos Communications,
Inc., formerly known as i2 Telecom International, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrew L. Berman, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
      :May 3,
      2010
              /s/ Andrew L. BermanAndrew
      L. Berman
                Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

l0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138756

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138756 COA: 281763 Muskegon CC: 06-054255-FH ANGELO GERR OD CHANDLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Larry Richard TYLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 25, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Anthony CHIARENZA, Appellant, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI SPRINGS, a Florida banking corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-30.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Richard W. DODGE, Petitioner, v. SEA LEDGE PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 44626.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 14, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed. 283 So.2d 55.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                          5,021
<SECURITIES>                                   38,565
<RECEIVABLES>                                 103,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                      738
<INVENTORY>                                   109,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              261,310
<PP&E>                                        635,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                339,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                600,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         179,985
<BONDS>                                       127,506
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       50,291
<OTHER-SE>                                    157,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  600,967
<SALES>                                     1,609,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,609,083
<CGS>                                       1,435,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,435,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              130,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (266)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                31,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            19,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   19,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.94
        

</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1981 

To provide that the rules of the Federal Communications Commission relating 

to preserving the open Internet and broadband industry practices shall 

be restored to effect until the date when the Commission takes final 

action in the proceedings on such rules that were remanded to the 

Commission by the United States Court of Appeals for the District 

of Columbia Circuit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2014 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To provide that the rules of the Federal Communications 

Commission relating to preserving the open Internet and 

broadband industry practices shall be restored to effect 

until the date when the Commission takes final action 

in the proceedings on such rules that were remanded 

to the Commission by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1981 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Open Internet Preser3 vation Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF OPEN INTERNET RULES DURING 

5 REMANDED PROCEEDINGS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The rules adopted by the Federal 

7 Communications Commission in the Report and Order in 

8 the matter of preserving the open Internet and broadband 

9 industry practices (FCC 10–201; adopted on December 

10 21, 2010) that were vacated by the United States Court 

11 of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Verizon 

12 v. Federal Communications Commission (No. 11–1355; 

13 decided on January 14, 2014) shall be restored to effect 

14 during the period beginning on the date of the enactment 

15 of this Act and ending on the date when the Commission 

16 takes final action in the proceedings remanded to the 

17 Commission in that decision. 

18 (b) ADJUDICATION AUTHORITY.—After the end of 

19 the period described in subsection (a), the Federal Com20 munications Commission may continue to adjudicate cases 

21 regarding violations of the rules described in such sub22 section that occurred during such period. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER
Appellate case name: Meria James Bradley v. Robert F. Authur

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00065

- CV

Trial court case number: 2011

- 57020

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Appellant Meria James Bradley , an inmate, appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his underlying civil action. On February 9, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that he has neither paid the $195 appellate filing fee nor establis hed indigence for purposes of appellate costs. Appellant was further notified that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellate filing fee was paid by March 11, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5, 20.1 On February 27, 201 5
, appellant filed an “Affidavit and Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis” but appellant’s filings fail to comply with the additional requirements of Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code governing inmate litigation.
Section 14.004 of the Texas Civil Practice and Rem edies Code provides that an inmate who files an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay costs must file an additional affidavit or declaration identifying each prior lawsuit, other than an action under the Family Code, filed by the inmate with out legal representation. T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE § 14.004(a). As to each prior lawsuit, the affidavit or declaration must specify the operative facts, the case name or style, the cause number, the court in which it was brought, the names of the partie s, and the result of the suit. Id . If a previous action or claim was dismissed as frivolous or malicious, the affidavit or unsworn declaration of previous filings must state the date of any final judgment or order affirming the dismissal. T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE § 14.004(b). Appellant has not filed an additional affidavit or declaration relating to previous filings

. Accordingly, this appeal may be dismissed without further notice unless, within 20 days of this order , appellant either (1) files all documents required by Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code or (2) pays the $195 appellate filing fee. See Gozowski v. T.D.C.J.

– I.D. , No. 12

- 14

- 00350

- CV, 2014 WL 6983246, *1 (Tex. App.

— Tyler Dec. 10, 2014, no pet. ) ; Hickman v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice , No. 13

- 12

- 00437

- CV, 2013 WL 3770916, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi July 18, 2013, no pet.); Douglas v. Turner , 441 S.W.3d 337, 339 (Tex. App.

—

Waco May 9, 2013, no pet.).It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 26, 2015
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                         DATUM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                ------------------------------------------
                                                   1995            1994            1993
                                                ----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>             <C>
Primary earnings:

Net Income                                      $   60,000      $  936,000      $   72,000
                                                ----------      ----------      ----------
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding                      3,713,710       2,628,727       2,558,356

Effect of common stock equivalents                 240,597         104,085
                                                ----------      ----------      ----------

Weighted average common shares
  outstanding as adjusted                        3,954,307       2,732,812       2,558,356
                                                ----------      ----------      ----------
Primary earnings per common share               $      .02      $      .34      $      .03
                                                ==========      ==========      ==========


Assuming full dilution:

Net income                                      $   60,000      $  936,000      $   72,000
                                                ----------      ----------      ----------

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding                      3,713,710       2,628,727       2,558,356

Effect of common stock equivalents                 253,157         126,706
                                                ----------      ----------      ----------
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding as adjusted                        3,966,867       2,755,433       2,558,356
                                                ----------      ----------      ----------
Earnings per common share assuming
  full dilution                                 $      .02       $     .34      $      .03
                                                ==========      ==========      ==========

</TABLE>
#### Anne PETTERSEN et al., Appellants, v. Gordon NELSON, Appellee.

No. 43252.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1973.

Appeal dismissed, sua sponte. 269 So.2d 22.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, L. Michael Cutrer,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof North American Scientific, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: June 9, 2005                |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| /s/  L. Michael Cutrer                 |   |
| L.  Michael Cutrer                     |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### Bryan B. CRERAR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-938.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1973.

Leonard Robbins and Jerome M. Rosen-blum, Hollywood, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lashley v. State, Fla.1953, 67 So.2d 648; Kraus v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 214.