alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Victor
Zhou and Yungeng Hu, Chief Executive Officer, and President and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      April 10, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      Victor ZhouVictor
      Zhou
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              
              /s/
      Yungeng Hu
              Yungeng
      Hu
              President
      & Chief Financial Officer




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under

E.O.	13563	and	12866	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.

**9 Comments on U.S.**  **Environmental Protection Agency Proposed Rule, “**  **Control of Air Pollution f rom**  **Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards ,” RIN 2060** 

**- AQ86** 

V.F.6. a. Gasoline Used in Military Applications

In our diesel fuel program, we provided an exemption for diesel fuel used in tactical military vehicles and nonroad engines and equipment with a national security exemption (NSE) from the vehicle and engine emissions standards. Due to national security co nsiderations, some of EPA’s existing regulations allow the military to request and receive NSEs for vehicles, engines, and equipment from emissions regulations if the operational requirements for such vehicles, engines, or equipment warrant such an exempti on. Fuel used in these applications would also be exempt if it is used in tactical military vehicles, engines, or equipment that are not covered b y an NSE but, for national securit y reasons (such as the need to be ready for immediate deploy ment overseas), these applications need to be fueled on the same fuel as those with an NSE. We are proposing this exemption under the proposed Tier 3 gasoline program.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Voting
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.19 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 2012 Voting Hot Report: State-Level Maps and Graphs on Voting The Census Bureau today released a menu-driven, interactive Web page permitting users to access for any state a series of graphs showing percentages of adults who voted and registered in every congressional and presidential election between 1996 and 2010. In addition to graphs showing voting and registration trends over the period, users may choose a given election year and find separate graphs showing voting and registration by one of the following characteristics: age, sex, educational attainment, and race and Hispanic origin. Some analysis of the 2010 election is provided as well, as are thematic maps of states showing percent voting during each election. The statistics come from the Current Population Survey. To access this page, go to the “Voting and Registration” page <https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/socdemo/voting/index.html> and click on “Voting Hot Report.” **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Rance SMITH, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Bradford Ernest WEBB, Jr., and Merlin, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 73-94.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2013034EN.01000401.xml

| 6.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 February 2013

2013/C 34/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3537 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4595 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85990 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5632 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2299 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4140 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,647 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,33 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6999 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1815 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3767 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3837 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3030 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3511 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4965 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6074 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6762 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 472,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,0170 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4341 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5910 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 094,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1908 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,022 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6480 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,273 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6934 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1341 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,9290 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3537

JPY

Japanese yen

126,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4595

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85990

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5632

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2299

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4140

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,647

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,33

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6999

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1815

RON

Romanian leu

4,3767

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3837

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3030

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3511

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4965

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6074

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6762

KRW

South Korean won

1 472,49

ZAR

South African rand

12,0170

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4341

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5910

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 094,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1908

PHP

Philippine peso

55,022

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6480

THB

Thai baht

40,273

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6934

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1341

INR

Indian rupee

71,9290

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-30-2005

USA v. Sicenavage

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-3095

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Sicenavage" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 198.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/198
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 November 7, 2005

No. 04-3095

 

 United States of America

v.

Leonard J. Sicenavage, Appellant

 (Eastern District of Pennsylvania(D.C.#03-cr-00370) 

 

Present: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, VAN ANTWERPEN and COWEN, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Appellant to Vacate Remand Order and for Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal

Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b).

2. Appellee’s Response to Appellant’s Motion to Vacate Remand Order and for

Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal.

 

 /s/ Carmella L. Wells 

Carmella L. Wells 267-299-4928

Case Manager

Opinion and Judgment issued on 10/31/05

Mandate due to issue on 11/22/05

 

 O R D E R 

After consideration of appellant’s motion to vacate remand order and for voluntary dismissal of the

appeal pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b) and appellee’s response thereto, it is ordered that the opinion and

judgment filed October 31, 2005, is vacated and the foregoing appeal is dismissed pursuant to F.R.A.P.

42(b).

By the Court,

 /s/ Anthony J. Scirica 

Chief Judge

Dated: November 30, 2005
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In  connection  with the annual  report of  DataMetrics  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  October 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
Bertram,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,  pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), that to my
knowledge:

            (1)   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

DATAMETRICS CORPORATION


By: Daniel Bertram
---------------------------------
    Daniel Bertram, CEO

Dated: July 6, 2006


                                       46
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Geos Communications,
Inc., formerly known as i2 Telecom International, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard H Robinson, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and




(2)
     The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.




Date:
            May
      3, 2010
            /s/ Richard H. RobersonRichard
      H. RobersonChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial andAccounting
      Officer)
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-186894) and Amendment No. 523 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
#### J. H. LAWSON, Appellant, v. FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK and Marine Office of America, Appellees.

No. 71-298.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 14, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.02 **Contact:**  Malkia McLeod
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JAN. 7, 2010 Media Advisory — Congressman McHenry, Mayor Stultz to Open Gastonia 2010 Census Office
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2012154EN.01000201.xml

| 31.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.6471 — Outokumpu/Inoxum)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 154/02

On 21 May 2012, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 / 22967244) or by post, under reference COMP/M.6471 — Outokumpu/Inoxum, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



I, Paul R. Arena, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of i2 Telecom International, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 12, 2004



/s/    Paul R. ArenaPaul R. Arena,Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
Table B-5.  Standard Errors of Homeownership Rates for the United States
            by Age of Householder and by Family Status:  1995 
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                         
                                             Married-                One person   Two or more 
                                      United couple   Other families households   person households
                                      States families Male   Female Male   Female Male   Female
                                                                                              
 Total                                   0.1      0.1    (X)    (X)    (X)    (X)    (X)    (X)
                                                                                               
   Nonmarried-couple family households   0.3      (X)    0.6    0.3    (X)    (X)    (X)    (X)
   One person households..............   0.2      (X)    (X)    (X)    0.3    0.3    (X)    (X)
   Two or more persons households.....   0.4      (X)    (X)    (X)    (X)    (X)    0.5    0.7
    Less than 25 years................   0.3      0.7    1.4    0.6    0.8    0.7    (X)    (X)
    25 to 29 years....................   0.3      0.5    1.6    0.7    0.8    0.9    (X)    (X)
    30 to 34 years....................   0.3      0.4    1.6    0.7    0.9    1.1    (X)    (X)
    35 to 39 years....................   0.3      0.3    1.5    0.7    0.9    1.2    (X)    (X)
    40 to 44 years....................   0.3      0.3    1.5    0.8    1.0    1.2    (X)    (X)
    45 to 49 years....................   0.3      0.3    1.6    0.9    1.0    1.1    (X)    (X)
    50 to 54 years....................   0.3      0.3    1.9    1.1    1.2    1.1    (X)    (X)
    55 to 59 years....................   0.3      0.3    2.2    1.3    1.4    1.1    (X)    (X)
    60 to 64 years....................   0.3      0.3    2.4    1.3    1.4    1.0    (X)    (X)
    65 to 69 years....................   0.3      0.3    2.3    1.3    1.3    0.8    (X)    (X)
    70 to 74 years....................   0.3      0.3    2.3    1.3    1.3    0.7    (X)    (X)
    75 years and over.................   0.3      0.4    1.7    0.9    0.9    0.5    (X)    (X)
                                                                                               
      Less than 35 years..............   0.2      0.3    0.9    0.4    0.5    0.6    0.6    0.7
      35 to 44 years..................   0.2      0.2    1.1    0.6    0.6    0.8    1.2    1.9
      45 to 54 years..................   0.2      0.2    1.3    0.7    0.8    0.8    1.7    2.1
      55 to 64 years..................   0.2      0.2    1.7    0.9    1.0    0.7    2.4    3.0
      65 years and over...............   0.2      0.2    1.2    0.7    0.7    0.4    2.5    2.4
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.  2-03-394-CR

BOON MOUNIVONG	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	Appellant Boon Mounivong appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.     The trial court imposed sentence on May 30, 2002, and appellant filed a motion for new trial on June 13, 2002.  Thus, in order to ensure a timely appeal, appellant needed to file his notice of appeal by August 28, 2002.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2.  Appellant filed his notice of appeal on September 11, 2003, along with a motion for permission to file untimely notice of appeal.  Although appellant’s motion could be construed as a motion to extend time to file a late notice of appeal under rule 26.3, it does not comply with the requirements of rule 10.5.  Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(2), 26.3.  Thus, we will not extend the deadline for filing the notice of appeal under rule 26.3. 

	On September 30, 2003, this court informed appellant that it was concerned it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal and gave appellant the opportunity to show grounds for continuing the appeal.  See id.; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  Appellant did not respond.  Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss the appeal firor want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 423.32(faf); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAY, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P.  47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  OcNovember 6, 2003
FlyMot ion Medi a LLC

. – ADDENDUM TO ADD ALL APPROVED UAS

- 1 of 1

March 15, 2016 U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590
Submitted Electronically via the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS)

Dear Sir or Madam : On behalf of R yan English , President of FlyMotion Media LLC (Applicant). I, Eric Andelin, President of Vertical Information Services, Inc., (VERTX) and consultant to the applicant have prepared the following addendum to Exemption No. 13803 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3451

. This addendum adds any aircraft identified on the List of Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) under Section 333 at regulatory docket FAA

– 2007

– 3330 at www.regulations.gov , (which is updated regularly) when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Allowing the use of any aircraft on the List of Approved Unmann ed Systems (UAS) has been approved recently in exemptions:

 Exemption No. 15233 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5418

 Exemption No. 15234 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5360

 Exemption No. 15235 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5272

 Exemption No. 15236 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5253

 Exemption No. 15237 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5236 The exemptions referenced above are identical in nature to VERTX’s prior approved client exemptions, including FlyMotion Media LLC ’s exemption and therefore no new precedent would be set by extending the same List to FlyMotion Media LLC

. This a ddendum makes no other changes to the currently approved Exemption No. 13803

. Please direct any ques tion or comment regarding this addendum to myself the Consultant for the Ap plicant. Consultant for Applicant Applicant Mr. Eric Andelin R yan English President President Vertical Information Services, Inc. FlyMotion Media LLC

. 301 W Platt St #654 1228 E. 7th Ave. Suite 200 Tampa, FL 33606 Tampa , FL 33605 Phone: 813.992.6612 Email: eric@vertisx.com