alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Pickle *v.*State.

(Division A.

April 29, 1935.)

[160 So. 909.

No. 31530.]

A. B. MeCraw, of Philadelphia, for appellant.

*564W. D. C.onn, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General for the state.

*566Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant was convicted of manufacturing intoxicating liquor. The evidence on which he was convicted was given by the sheriff and his deputies, who were searching the land in the neighborhood of the still when they discovered it and saw the appellant assisting in ■the operation of it. This evidence was objected to on the ground that it had been unlawfully obtained.

In support of the competency of the evidence, the state says: (1) That the sheriff acted on probable cause; (2) that the still was not located on land owned by or to which appellant had the right of possession; and (3) that the sheriff and his deputies were not on such land when they saw the still and the appellant thereat.

The information on which the sheriff acted was an anonymous letter received by him through the post office. This information was not such as to constitute probable cause for the search.

The land on which the still was located was south of the public road, and was owned by Smith. This land was joined on the south by land owned by.the appellant. Smith rented his land to the appellant’s brother, S. E. Pickle, who lived on the appellant’s land. Under a verbal agreement between them, the appellant and his •brother used the Smith land in common; the appellant paying one-half of the rent therefor. The still was located on the land rented from Smith, and it seems reasonably clear from the evidence that the sheriff and his *567deputies, when they discovered the still and saw the appellant thereat, were on either the land owned by the appellant or that rented from Smith, to which he had the right of possession. The search was therefore unlawful.

The trial judge in admitting the evidence expressed a doubt as to its competency, which doubt would probably have been removed had he had before him, as we have, the evidence afteri it had been transcribed by the stenographer.

The appellant requested the court below to instruct the jury to return a verdict in his favor, but it refused so to' do. He now says that we should hold this ruling of the court to have been wrong, and should reverse the judgment and render one here discharging him. The request for this peremptory instruction challenged simply the sufficiency of the evidence that was admitted, but not its competency. Consequently, the court below committed no error in refusing the instruction. It is true that without the wrongly admitted evidence the verdict cannot be sustained, but for aught we know, the state, had the evidence been excluded, might have introduced other evidence to the same effect.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Joseph GARRETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-774.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases American Community Survey (ACS) Health Care & Insurance Income & Wealth
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-R.01 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030 FTP site
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 19, 2012 (EMBARGO LIFTED) New York City's Household Income at $49,461 in 2011, American Community Survey Shows The median household income in New York was $49,461 in 2011, compared with  the national figure of $50,502, according to statistics released today from the 2011 American Community Survey by the  U.S. Census Bureau. In addition, 14.6 percent of people in New York did not  have health insurance coverage, compared with 15.1 percent nationally. A selected  profile of New York appears below, including statistics on education, housing  and the foreign-born population. "The American Community Survey provides a wide range of important  statistics about our nation's people, housing and economy for all communities  in the country - including New York," said Thomas Mesenbourg, the Census  Bureau's acting director. "The results are used by everyone from retailers,  homebuilders and police departments, to town and city planners." The survey is the only source of local estimates for most of the 40  topics it covers, such as educational attainment, housing, employment,  commuting, language spoken at home, nativity, ancestry and selected monthly  homeowner costs down to the smallest communities. Other selected highlights for New  York: Education In 2011, 58.9 percent of the preschool age population was enrolled       in school, compared with 47.4 percent in the nation as a whole.
  Among New York's 25-and-older population, 79.7 percent completed       high school or more, compared with 85.9 percent in the nation as a whole.
  Meanwhile, 34.1 percent of the 25-and-older population had a       bachelor's degree or higher, compared with 28.5 percent nationally. Housing In 2011, the median value for an owner-occupied home was $490,900.       In the nation as a whole, the value was $173,600.

  In 2011, the median gross rent (rent plus utilities) was $1,168,       compared with $871 in the nation as a whole. Foreign-Born Population About 37.2 percent of people in New York were foreign-born,       compared with 13.0 percent in the nation as a whole. More information about New York's social, economic and housing  characteristics, as well as information on other geographies, can be found on  the Census Bureau's *American FactFinder* website. The 2011 American  Community Survey one-year estimates are available for the nation, all 50  states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, every congressional district,  every metropolitan area, and all counties and places with populations of 65,000  or more. Estimates for areas with smaller populations will be available later  this year.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . A copy of the agreement is available through the Commission's website (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or                           ( print page 40514)                        by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012472-002.                

*Agreement Name:*                     Yang Ming/COSCO Shipping Slot Exchange Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd.; Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation; and Yang Ming (UK) Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Robert Magovern; Cozen O'Connor.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment revises the Agreement to clarify that the space provided to Yang Ming by COSCO SHIPPING will be provided on the CEN service and the AAC3 service, instead of the AAC service, effective on or around August 27, 2018.                

*Proposed Effective Date:*                     8/9/2018.                

*Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/​FMC.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​1969*.                

Dated: August 10, 2018.

Rachel Dickon,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-17609 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
# C_2013028EN.01000101.xml

| 30.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 January 2013

2013/C 28/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3433 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4595 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85360 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6110 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2416 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4110 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,659 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 297,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6991 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2090 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3835 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3805 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2860 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3510 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4223 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6072 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6629 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 458,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1785 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3659 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5870 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 003,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1421 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,836 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,4900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,098 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6773 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1112 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,1960 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3433

JPY

Japanese yen

121,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4595

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85360

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6110

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2416

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4110

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,659

HUF

Hungarian forint

297,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6991

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2090

RON

Romanian leu

4,3835

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3805

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2860

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3510

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4223

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6072

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6629

KRW

South Korean won

1 458,03

ZAR

South African rand

12,1785

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3659

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5870

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 003,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1421

PHP

Philippine peso

54,836

RUB

Russian rouble

40,4900

THB

Thai baht

40,098

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6773

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1112

INR

Indian rupee

72,1960

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2013337EN.01000101.xml

| 19.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7071 — Telenor/Schibsted/Singapore Press Holdings/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 337/01

On 8 November 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7071. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7071. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of income and the
notes thereto on pages 28 thru 52 of the Company's 1999 Annual Report to
Shareholders and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                        48
<INVENTORY>                                      1,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,841
<PP&E>                                           5,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,414
<BONDS>                                          3,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        349
<COMMON>                                           779
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,545
<SALES>                                          7,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,732
<CGS>                                            6,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    13
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    18
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    309
<INCOME-TAX>                                       105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       181
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36<F1>
<FN>
<F1>1999 Diluted EPS is the same as Basic EPS due to the anti-dilutive effect
from the assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock and the addback
of preferred dividends.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Gertrude L. HOLMES, Appellant, v. Clyde H. SIMPSON, as Tax Collector of Duval County, Florida et al., Appellees.

No. 36485.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 10, 1968.

William C. Bostwick, of Bostwick & Bostwick, Jacksonville, Mallory E. Horne, of Horne, Rhodes & Lamb, Tallahassee, for appellant.

F. William Marr, Jacksonville, for Clyde H. Simpson, Tax Collector Duval County.

Walter C. Shea, Jacksonville, for Comptroller and Board of County Comrs.

O. O. McCollum, Jr., Jacksonville, for Duval County Budget Commission.

Wm. Joe Sears, Jr., and Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay and Frank X. Fried-mann, Jr., Jacksonville, for Tax Assessor.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Larry Levy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Fred O. Dickinson, Jr., Comptroller of State of Florida.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Just Valuation & Taxation League, Inc. et al. v. Simpson, Tax Collector et al., Fla., 209 So.2d 229, this day filed.

CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and WALKER and POPPER, Circuit Judges, concur.'
#### Sonja McINTYRE a/k/a Sonia McIntyre, Appellant, v. John C. McINTYRE, Appellee.

No. 256.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 9, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2013115EN.01S00301.xml

| 23.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/s3

---

NOTICE

On 23 April 2013, in Official Journal of the European Union C 115 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fourth supplement to the 31st complete edition’ and the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — third supplement to the 31st complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
# C_2014185EN.01003501.xml

| 17.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/35 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to open winding-up proceedings against ‘LA VIE GREEK PUBLIC LIMITED HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY’

(Publication pursuant to Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

(2014/C 185/07)

| Insurance undertaking | ‘LA VIE GREEK PUBLIC LIMITED HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY’
based in Filadelfeos & Kefalariou 1 145 62 Kifissia GREECE | based in Filadelfeos & Kefalariou 1 | 145 62 Kifissia | GREECE |
| ------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | --------------- | ------ |
| based in Filadelfeos & Kefalariou 1 | | | | |
| 145 62 Kifissia | | | | |
| GREECE | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of the decision | Decision 103/1 of 21.2.2014 of the Committee for Credit and Insurance Matters of the Bank of Greece to permanently withdraw the company’s business licence and to wind it up.
Entry into force: 21.2.2014 | | | |
| Competent authorities | Bank of Greece, Private Insurance Supervisory Division
Address:
El. Venizelou 21 102 50 Athens GREECE | El. Venizelou 21 | 102 50 Athens | GREECE |
| El. Venizelou 21 | | | | |
| 102 50 Athens | | | | |
| GREECE | | | | |
| Supervisory authorities | Bank of Greece, Private Insurance Supervisory Decision
Address:
El. Venizelou 21 102 50 Athens GREECE | El. Venizelou 21 | 102 50 Athens | GREECE |
| El. Venizelou 21 | | | | |
| 102 50 Athens | | | | |
| GREECE | | | | |
| Liquidator appointed | Eleni Atherinou
(Winding-up supervisor)
Address:
Ζefyrou 24 145 63 Kifissia GREECE | Ζefyrou 24 | 145 63 Kifissia | GREECE |
| Ζefyrou 24 | | | | |
| 145 63 Kifissia | | | | |
| GREECE | | | | |
| Applicable law | Greek law, pursuant to the provisions of Articles 3(3), (7) to (9), 10, 12(a), 17(a) to 17(c) of Legislative Decree 400/1970 | | | |

---
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, D.C. KING, S.A. DOMINGUEZ

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

BENJAMIN C. LEIGHTON

GAS TURBINE SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN THIRD CLASS

(E-4), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201500321

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 23 July 2015.

Military Judge: CAPT R.J. Crow, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Naval Station 

Mayport, Jacksonville, FL.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LT M. Martin, JAGC, 

USN.

For Appellant: Maj Michael Berry, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

14 January 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

 For the Court 

 R.H. TROIDL 

 Clerk of Court
#### Warren Charles LOWE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-328.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 2, 1973.

Samuel S. Jacobson, of Datz, Jacobson & Dusek, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Spencer v. State, 133 So. 2d 729 (Fla.1961), and Coleman v. State, 215 So.2d 96 (Fla.App.1968).

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.