alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11-i

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

11.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 11-1

11.2 IMPACTS OF PURCHASE PRICE.............................................................................. 11-1
11-1

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

11.1 INTRODUCTION

The life-cycle cost (LCC) subgroup analysis evaluates impacts on identifiable groups of

customers who may be disproportionately affected by a national energy efficiency standard. The 

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) conducts the LCC subgroup analysis in preparation for the 

notice of proposed rulemaking. DOE will conduct this analysis, in part, by analyzing the LCC 

and payback periods (PBPs) for customers who fall into an identifiable group. DOE plans to 

evaluate variations in energy use and energy prices and use that might affect the net present 

value of a standard to customer subpopulations. To the extent possible, DOE will obtain 

estimates of the variability of each LCC and PBP input parameter and will consider that

variability in calculating customer impacts. DOE plans to perform sensitivity analyses to 

consider how differences in energy use will affect subgroups of customers.

DOE will determine effects on customer subgroups using the LCC spreadsheet model, 

which allows for different data inputs. The standard LCC analysis (described in Chapter 8) 

focuses on various types of distribution transformers and user groups. DOE can use the 

spreadsheet model to analyze the LCC for any subgroup of customer types by sampling only that 

subgroup. In the case of distribution transformers, some of the subgroups DOE may choose to 

consider are: (1) rural electric cooperatives, (2) municipal utilities and (3) owners of equipment 

with specific installation requirements, for example: vault installed transformers. (Chapter 8 

preliminary technical support document explains in detail the inputs to the model used to

determine LCC and PBP.)

11.2 IMPACTS OF PURCHASE PRICE

DOE is especially sensitive to increases in product purchase prices related to new 

standards. DOE wishes to avoid negative impacts on identifiable population groups that may be 

unable to afford significant increases in equipment price. Because increases in first costs of 

equipment can preclude the purchase of a new model, some customers may retain equipment

past their useful life. Older equipment are generally are less efficient to begin with, and their 

efficiency may deteriorate further if they are retained beyond their useful life. Increases in first 

cost also can preclude the purchase of new equipment altogether, resulting in a potentially large 

loss of utility to the customer.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3052

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to correct

the tariff treatment of certain nickel catalysts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1993

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States to correct the tariff treatment of certain nickel

catalysts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN NICKEL CATALYSTS.

4 The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

5 States is amended by striking subheading 3815.11.00 and

6 inserting the following new subheadings, with a superior

7 heading thereto having the same degree of indentation as

8 subheading 3815.12.00, and with the subheadings
2

•HR 3052 IH

1 3815.11.10 and 3815.11.20 having the same degree of in2 dentation as subheading 3815.90.10:

‘‘ With nickel or nickel compounds as

the active substance:

3815.11.10 Containing nickel powder, or nickel

compound powder, suspended or

encapsulated in vegetable oil or tallow .................................................. 3.7% Free

(A,CA,E,IL)

25%

3815.11.20 Other .............................................. Free 25%

’’.

3 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

5 respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse

6 for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date

7 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          90,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         60,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,503
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,511
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,573
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (513)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (513)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (513)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.109**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office								301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)301-457-1037 (TDD)e-mail: 2000usa@census.govStatistical Information StaffPopulation Division301-457-2422e-mail: pop@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12:01 A.M. EDT, MAY 22, 2001 (TUESDAY)

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Demographic Profile for Tennessee

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the *Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000* for Tennessee, a one-page table providing Census 2000 data on age and sex distribution, race, Hispanic origin, household relationship and type, housing occupancy and tenure (whether the housing occupant owns or rents).

 The profile includes nearly 100 data items in all, plus percentage distributions.

 In addition to the profile of the state as a whole, similar demographic profiles for counties, places and other geographic components of the state can be accessed on an embargoed basis at <http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/>. After the release time, go to the Census Bureau's online search-and-retrieval database *American FactFinder* <http://factfinder2.census.gov< or to its Demographic Profile Page <https://www.census.gov/census2000/demoprofile.html>. You will also be able to download the profiles from the bureau's file transfer protocol site <http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/>.

 For information about how to order paper copies of Census 2000 demographic profiles, contact Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, 301-457-4100; or e-mail:<webmaster@census.gov>.

 For local context, contact the Tennessee State Data Center, 423-974-6080; e-mail: <bvickers@utk.edu.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7186

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:05-cr-01163-HMH-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: January 7, 2009

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

David Wright appeals the district court’s order

determining that he is ineligible for a sentence modification

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Wright , No. 6:05-cr-01163-HMH-1 (D.S.C. July 11, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Valerie ZARR, also known as Valerie J. Thompson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-291.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 30, 1972.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2012171EN.01000701.xml

| 16.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 June 2012

2012/C 171/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2596 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4313 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81190 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8353 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5240 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,592 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,64 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6969 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2984 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4632 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2910 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2564 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2901 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7742 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6046 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6037 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 466,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5621 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0258 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5501 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 863,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9841 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,288 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,9368 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,652 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5924 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5336 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7980 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2596

JPY

Japanese yen

99,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4313

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81190

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8353

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5240

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,592

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,64

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6969

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2984

RON

Romanian leu

4,4632

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2910

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2564

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2901

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7742

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6046

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6037

KRW

South Korean won

1 466,34

ZAR

South African rand

10,5621

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0258

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5501

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 863,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9841

PHP

Philippine peso

53,288

RUB

Russian rouble

40,9368

THB

Thai baht

39,652

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5924

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5336

INR

Indian rupee

69,7980

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012375EN.01000101.xml

| 5.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 375/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 375/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 December 2012

2012/C 375/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3092 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4604 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81230 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6265 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2136 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,243 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,39 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1291 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5343 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3367 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2497 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3013 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1463 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5866 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5941 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 419,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5504 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1506 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5265 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 580,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9830 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,449 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3515 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,179 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7575 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9802 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,5710 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3092

JPY

Japanese yen

107,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4604

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81230

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6265

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2136

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,243

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,39

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1291

RON

Romanian leu

4,5343

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3367

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2497

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3013

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1463

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5866

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5941

KRW

South Korean won

1 419,25

ZAR

South African rand

11,5504

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1506

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5265

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 580,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9830

PHP

Philippine peso

53,449

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3515

THB

Thai baht

40,179

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7575

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9802

INR

Indian rupee

71,5710

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Walter W. LUCE, Appellant, v. Lawrence LEDGER and Charldon Construction Company, a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-903.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry L. THORPE and Chester R. Strickland.

No. 59776.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

Robert J. Zibilich, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, William L. Crull, III, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plain tiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
4.11 

OFFlCEOFTHEAlTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

OROVER SCLLCRS 

Amom OINIML 

m. Leroy L. hiowe 

county Attorney 

Aouston County 

Crockett, Texas 

Desr Sir: Upinion iJ0. C-7303 

ne: -ilen a o-dt is 

Tour letter of act 

eff’ect our apinl-xl as to 

mve overruled osr prior 

end e-6558, we 

amended in 19 

triiir for SCtlOO 

ing, avail nin 

15, 04435, 3-olS$ 

7238, .x. J., as 

in a euit against 

ffirwtive pleadk ten year limits- 

&o. v. G:fty of ihouston, 

on Gourt of uivil Ap.eals 

cle 7298 lixing a ten year 

district and. ro?d district 

rst declining to grmt a writ, ttle Texas 

motion for r&earing, nanted the appliSUCII cause, beiq i4o. X-926 on 
KS. Loroy L. Moon, Pa&s 2 

tne dockct of tho Supraaa Court 1s 8et for l ubalralon in 

tha Su,prome Court on Wove&or 13, 1946. Point No. I in 

the lpplioation for writ of error challenges th8 aorrect 

ne8s of the lowsr oourt*s deairfon on tiu constltutionallt~ 

of the 1931 amndmont to Artiale 7298. The Suoreme Court 

ihe writ of e&or with the notation tiit it wa8 

on Point8 f, II and III. 

iie trust that this is tile ir;fmmation desired by 

Yours very truly 

_(_ _ .....
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1791 

To provide for the treatment of certain hospitals under the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2013 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the treatment of certain hospitals under the 

Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Competition for 

5 Hospitals Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN HOSPITALS. 

7 (a) TREATMENT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

9 provision of law, effective for discharges occurring 

10 on or after October 1, 2014, for purposes of making 

11 payments under section 1886(d) of the Social SecuVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:53 Dec 13, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1791.IS S1791

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1791 IS

1 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww) to a hospital described 

2 in paragraph (2), the wage index that applies to 

3 such hospital under such section shall be the highest 

4 wage index assigned to hospitals in the core-based 

5 statistical area in which the hospital is located (re6 gardless of which State the hospital is located in) as 

7 a result of the application of section 4410(a) of the 

8 Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww 

9 note). 

10 (2) HOSPITAL DESCRIBED.—A hospital de11 scribed in this paragraph is a hospital— 

12 (A) that is located in a core-based statis13 tical area which is comprised of counties from 

14 more than 1 State; 

15 (B) that is not located in a core-based sta16 tistical area in which 1 or more hospitals are 

17 subject to the minimum wage index under para18 graph (h)(4) of section 412.64 of title 42, Code 

19 of Federal Regulations; and 

20 (C) that is not located in a core-based sta21 tistical area in which the highest wage index de22 scribed in paragraph (1) applies to hospitals de23 scribed in such paragraph under a State reim24 bursement system under section 1814(b)(3) or 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1791 IS

1 1886(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

2 1395f(b)(3); 1395ww(c)). 

3 (b) RULES.—Any increase in the wage index of a hos4 pital as a result of the application of subsection (a) shall 

5 be treated as the result of a decision of the Medicare Geo6 graphic Classification Review Board under paragraph (10) 

7 of section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1395ww(d)) and subject to budget neutrality under para9 graph (8)(D) of such section. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2012146EN.01000901.xml

| 24.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/9

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

2012/C 146/06

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| | EPSO/AST/119/12 — Proofreaders (AST 3) with Czech as their main language (CS) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AST/119/12 — Proofreaders (AST 3) with Czech as their main language (CS)

| | EPSO/AST/120/12 — Proofreaders (AST 3) with Danish as their main language (DA) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AST/120/12 — Proofreaders (AST 3) with Danish as their main language (DA)

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 146 A of 24 May 2012 in Czech and Danish only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Colombia
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy