alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee (#13883).                

*Date and Time:*                     September 20, 2018; 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.                

September 21, 2018, 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314, Room E 2030.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open. Attendance information for the meeting will be forthcoming on the website:                     *https://www.nsf.gov/​mps/​ast/​aaac.jsp*.                

*Contact Person:*                     Dr. Christopher Davis, Program Director, Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite W 9136, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-4910.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies.                

*Agenda:*                     To hear presentations of current programming by representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for achieving them.                

Dated: August 13, 2018.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-17690 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# C_2013263EN.01000102.xml

| 12.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6978 — Banco Popular/Credit Mutuel/ATM Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 263/02

On 3 September 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6978. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6978. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                              3062
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      85041
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                        77512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  181919
<PP&E>                                            396040
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (169183)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    480386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             126926
<BONDS>                                           147273
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                            9228
<OTHER-SE>                                        146726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      480386
<SALES>                                           610655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  610655
<CGS>                                             531961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     531961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 12929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     5422
<INCOME-TAX>                                        2058
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 3364
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                            983
<NET-INCOME>                                        4347
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.49



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ron Schutte, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Brooklyn Cheesecake &
Desserts Company, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 12, 2005


/s/ Ronald L. Schutte
------------------------------------
Ronald L. Schutte
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Table B-2.  Standard Errors of Estimated Percentages for Characteristics of Vacant Rental and Homeo
                    Housing Units:  2003
 
 
 
                                    Estimated percentage
 
                                1 or     2 or     5 or    10 or    15 or    20 or    25 or
                                 99       98       95       90       85       80       75       50
 
 
Vacant rental units........     0.1      0.1      0.2      0.3      0.4      0.4      0.5      0.5
Vacant homeowner units.....     0.2      0.2      0.4      0.5      0.6      0.7      0.7      0.8
# C_2013258EN.01000102.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7002 — M&G/Alliance Medical)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 258/02

On 2 September 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7002. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7002. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                      Consent of Independent Auditors
                                     
                                     
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective
Amendment number 6 to Registration Statement number 2-54429 on Form S-8,
Post-Effective Amendment Number 9 to Registration Statement Number 2-42388
on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-23709 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement Number 33-23710 on Form S-8, Registration Statement
Number 33-54176 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-64729 on Form
S-8, and Registration Statement Number 33-64731 on Form S-8 of our report
dated January 30, 1996, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of A.T.Cross Company as of December 31, 1995, and
for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1995, included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Providence, Rhode Island
March 25, 1997
July 1, 2015

Mr. Jared Oleson

5 865 93 rd Ave

Pinellas Park, FL 33782

Dear Mr. Covert :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 26, 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 2015

-

2494 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you mus t send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sec tions of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your reques t.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before th e proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 3.2


         Article IV of the  Company's  By-laws  was  amended to include  Section
4.15, Voting Ties, as written below:

         Section  4.15.  Voting Ties.  If a quorum of Directors is present,  and
during  the course of a  Directors  meeting a vote is taken on a  resolution  or
other  matter  which  results in an initial  tie among the  Directors,  then the
Chairman of the Board of Directors  shall have the right to break the voting tie
by casting an  additional  vote and the  resolution  or other  matter voted upon
shall be carried in accordance  with the  Chairman's  tie-breaking  vote. If the
Chairman of the Board is not present at the  meeting,  no other  Director  shall
have a tie-breaking vote.





                                       12

<PAGE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ECCO 2018 TX1 AS ASSIGNEE OF 

ADVANTAGE ASSETS II, INC.,

Appellant,

V.

ROBERT G. ALVIDREZ,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00188-CV

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Andrews County, Texas

(TC# 21,538)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### Gerald M. WORMSER d/b/a Wormser’s of Lafayette, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald I. FRICKE et al., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 4461.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 12, 1974.

*500Dragon & Kellner by Victor E. Kellner, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant.

Caliste Beard, Jr., Lafayette, for defendant-appellee.

Before HOOD, MILLER and DOMEN-GEAUX, JJ.

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

Gerald M. Wormser, d/b/a Wormser’s of Lafayette, appeals a city court judgment on an open account in his favor and against one of the defendants, Virginia G. Fricke, only insofar as the nomenclature of the parties in the judgment is concerned.

The facts show that during the marriage of Donald I. and Virginia G. Fricke, the plaintiff Gerald M. Wormser, d/b/a Wormser’s of Lafayette, sold and delivered merchandise to the Frickes on open account. This suit was filed for a balance of $980.57 due on said account. Prior to the suit, defendant, Virginia G. Fricke, had become divorced from her husband, Donald, and married Caliste Beard, Jr., to whom she is presently married and residing with. Defendant, Donald I. Fricke, was never found for service of petition and citation in the instant case.

At trial, on stipulations, Virginia Fricke confessed judgment on the open account in the amount alleged. Thereafter, plaintiff’s attorney submitted a formal judgment which identified the defendant as “Virginia G. Fricke Beard”. Both sides presented arguments on the desired nomenclature of the parties in the submitted judgment, the attorney for the defendant objecting to any inclusion of the name “Beard” in the judgment.

After taking the matter under advisement the trial judge prepared and signed a judgment for the plaintiff and against “Virginia G. Fricke, divorced wife of Donald I. Fricke, and now married to Caliste Beard, Jr.”

The plaintiff appeals maintaining that the trial judge erred in identifying the defendant only by her- former marriage name. Plaintiff alleges (although the record is silent thereon) that due to the wording of the judgment herein, the Clerk of Court of Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, indexed the judgment in the mortgage records under “Fricke, Virginia G.” and not also under “Beard”. Thus, it is maintained that plaintiff has a right to a judgment identifying the defendant as “Virginia G. Fricke Beard”. We feel plantiff’s position lacks merit.

This present suit was filed against “Virginia G. Fricke”. She answered plaintiff’s petition as “Virginia G. Fricke, divorced wife of Donald I. Fricke, now married to Caliste Beard, Jr.” The city judge rendered judgment against “Virginia G. Fricke, divorced wife of Donald I. Fricke, now married to Caliste Beard, Jr.”

In our opinion the judgment is clear and leaves no doubt as to the parties for, or against whom it was rendered.

*501For the aboye and foregoing reasons we find no error in the judgment of the trial court, and accordingly, the same is affirmed at the cost of plaintiff-appellant.

Affirmed.
No. 11851.

#### Harmon, Receiver, *v.*Lippincott.

Decided February 8, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Mr. Edward Colston; Mr. Jay I^each; Mr. I. R. Longsworth*and *Mr. Morrison R. Waite,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. D. C.*Henderson, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Spear, Spiauck and Price, JJ.', concur.
J

~ SED STq l

~ S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY o 

# ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 2 

### O=

~ yT qt PROj -G

~

\ 

### J U N 1 8 2012

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Mr. J.R. Stroble Director, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221 Dear Mr. Stroble: We received your letter dated June 18, 2012, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertification expansion memo the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Argonne National Laboratory (ANI.,). We concur with CBFO's draft recertification expansion memo will allow ANL to ship Solidified Liquid Waste which EPA approved on June 14, 2012, as a Tier 1 change. The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH and RH TRU waste are appropriately included in Attachment 4 of the draft recertification expansion memo. The waste characterization equipment, procedures and processes included in the memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site. Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification memo for INI, CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462. Sincerely,
hr~

Edward Feltcorn Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100 % Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Papercc: (Electronic Distribution)

Joe Franco, CBFO Ed Ziemianski, CBFO Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP Court Fesmire, CBFO QA Site Documents, CBFO Tom Peake, EPA Raymond Lee, EPA