alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17578]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 05/05-0288 issued to 
Stonehenge Opportunity Fund II, LP, said license is hereby declared 
null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

    Dated: April 6, 2018.
A. Joseph Shepard,
Associate Administrator for Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2018-17578 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
From: Mark Champion [mailto:mark@hearthlabsolutions.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:50 PM

To: Toney, Mike

Cc: Wood, Gil; Sanchez, Rafael; Brandon

Subject: Pellet cert using ASTM 2779

Mike,

England's stove works is nearly finished with development of two new pellet stove models which I have 

been helping them with. We expect to schedule EPA certification testing in the next few days for one 

and the second will follow a few weeks later.

We would like to get EPA's approval to use the new proposed test method for pellet heaters (ASTM 

2779-10) during this certification testing, even prior to EPA's new regulation going into effect. I 

understand that under the current NSPS, EPA has the authority to allow alternate test methods. For 

England's Stove Works, the benefit would primarily be financial in that testing costs may be significantly 

reduced with the proposed method and presumably, testing would be valid once the new regulations do 

go into effect; the later would possibly make testing on these models unnecessary in the future (other 

than audit testing as required).

Development laboratory results show emissions of about 1 g/hr using the current NSPS methods. We 

expect numbers approximately 30% lower using ASTM 2779-10 however testing has been very limited 

thus far since allowance of the method is undetermined.

In public and private meetings and conversations, I have never heard a negative comment or concern 

about the use of ASTM 2779-10. I realize this is no guarantee of it's inclusion in the new NSPS but 

allowance by EPA of this 'alternate' method would be applauded by all concerned. I believe the method 

to be more technically valid in that it includes transition periods of emissions, not just steady state 

operation using four discreet power settings. This better mimics field operation. (It would be nice to 

find a similar solution for wood stoves as well.)

Please consider allowing England's to use ASTM 2779-10 for these upcoming certifications. I assume a 

letter of allowance will be necessary and as available, this should be directed to:

Brandon Morrison

England's Stove Works, Inc

589 South Five Forks Road

Monroe, VA 24574

800-516-3636 x144

bmorrison@englanderstoves.com

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Sincerely,

Mark Champion

Hearthlab Solutions, LLC

650 302 5517
#### Frank KAYE, as father of Wayne Kaye, a minor, deceased and as husband of Rose Kaye, Appellant, v. Dr. Jordan K. DAVIS, M.D., Appellee.

No. 71-542.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 30, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Special Topic in Nephrology.                    

*Date:*                         August 22, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Atul Sahai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2188, MSC 7818, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1198,                         *sahaia@csr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 9, 2018.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-17472 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
TheHONORABLE DEAN WHIPPLE, United States District Judge for th e 1 Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3857

___________ Louie Wesley Crandall, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Dr. Catron; Bill Pierce, Sheriff of * Jasper County, MO; Jasper County, MO, * [UNPUBLISHED] *

Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 15, 1997 Filed: October 22, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Louie W. Crandall appeals from the district court & s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Mark Catron , Sh eriff William Pierce, and Jasper County in this 4 2-2-

U.S.C. § 1983 action. Crandall claimed that while he was det ained at the county jail, he was deprived of hi s constituti onal rights related to his medical needs. The district court granted summary judgment, concludin g Crandall failed to establish a serious-3-

medic al need. After careful review of the record, w e affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2012144EN.01000102.xml

| 23.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6530 — EDF/Edison)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 144/02

On 10 May 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6530. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6530. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00505-CR

JUAN GARCIA CERVANTES A/K/A JUAN CERVANTES

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR-3283-22-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 9, 2023
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009 fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the period indicated.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                     |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | INCOME OPPORTUNITY INVESTORS, INC.                                                  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |    
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Daniel J. Moos                                                                  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Daniel J. Moos                                                                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                 |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |    
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gene S. Bertcher                                                                |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Gene S. Bertcher                                                                    |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |  |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7714

In Re: ANDRE SYLVESTER WATTS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted: December 11, 2002 Decided: January 8, 2003

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Sylvester Watts, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Andre S. Watts petitions for a writ of mandamus. Watts seeks

an order compelling the United States Parole Commission to grant a

parole hearing.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a

clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan

Assn., 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a

drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary

circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S.

394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

Moreover, jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against an agency

of the United States lies with the district courts, not this court.

28 U.S.C. § 1361 (2000); Estate of Michael v. Lullo, 173 F.3d 503,

506 (4th Cir. 1999).

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny without prejudice the petition for writ of

mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
December 8, 2015 

Mr. Randall S. Fiertz 

Director, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Re: FAA Policy Change 79 FR 66282-01, Docket FAA 2013-0988 

Action Plan for Aviation Fuel Tax 

Dear Mr. Fiertz: 

The City of Modesto, Modesto City-County Airport, has not imposed any general sales 

tax on aviation fuel that were not in effect on December 30, 1987, and therefore does 

not require an action plan. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please contact me at (209) 

577-5319 or e-mail to mgermanowski@modestogov.com. 

Mark Germanowski 

Airport Manager 

Public Works, City of Modesto
260 La. 1131

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Earl J. BILLIOT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52158.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Earl J. Billiot applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

HAMLIN, J.,

concurs and observes that applicant does not contend that he is innocent of the crime charged.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. Counsel pleaded for the defendant in this felony case. Defendant must plead “in person.” See Code of Criminal Procedure Article 553 and redactor’s comment thereunder and see former R.S. 15:257.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the defendant himself must plead and say the words “guilty” or “not guilty” under the law of this State.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30229 (Summary Calendar)

__________________

AURELIO GARCIA RAMIREZ; MARTIN MADRIGAL VARGAS; ELMONZO FARMER; JOHN WYLY Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus CHARLES HARMON, Sheriff, Madison Parish; JAMES D. CALDWELL, District Attorney; CHARLES R. BRACKIN, Judge, Sixth Judicial District Court; SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, MADISON PARISH Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(USDC No. 95-CV-214)

- - - - - - - - - - May 16, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Appellants appeal from the district court's order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action for lack of standing. They argue that the district court's decision is contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in County of Riverside v. McLaughlin , 5002 In their § 1983 complaint, Ramirez and Vargas included a

reservation of rights to assert claims for monetary damages, but they have not pursued that issue here and we do not address it here, whether as to standing or otherwise.
2 U.S. 44, 51-52 (1991). Ramirez and Vargas also argue that although their claims may be moot, they are capable of repetition yet evade review. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the claims of Ramirez and Vargas for essentially the

reasons given by the district court. R amirez v. Harmon , No. 95-CV214 (W.D. La. March 2, 1995). We affirm the district court's determination that Farmer and Wyly lack standing on the alternative

gr ound that they do not have a cause of action for an unconstitutional detention without a prompt probable cause determination. See Bickford v. International Speedway Corp. , 654 F.2d 1028, 1031 (5th Cir. 1981). 2

AFFIRMED.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Senegal
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2024

NO. 03

- 22

- 00710

- CR

Marcus Johannsan Mitchell , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
Docket No: FAA-2015-1982 Dir ID: 2014-NM-108-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 5/23/14

Regional Airline Association 5/23/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 5/23/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 5/23/14
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cutter & Buck Inc. ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal year
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2004 ("the Report"), I, Frances M. Conley, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | /s/FRANCES M. CONLEY                                                   
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                        
| | Frances M. Conley
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

30

---

QuickLinks
No. 11496.

#### Lentz et al. *v.*Lentz.

Decided January 25, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Putnam county.

*Mr. W. W. Sutton*and *Mr. 'George Frits,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Cole,*

*Williams & Cole*and *Messrs. Handy & Uñverferth,*for defendant in error.

Judgment'affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, jj.-,-concur.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Northeast Utilities (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.   /s/Charles W. Shivery(Signature)Charles W. ShiveryChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHale(Signature)David R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date:  February 26, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.