alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON PAGES 25 THROUGH 49 OF THE
COMPANY'S 1997 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                        45
<INVENTORY>                                      1,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,147
<PP&E>                                           5,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,049
<BONDS>                                          3,301
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        521
<COMMON>                                           779
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,306
<SALES>                                          8,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,495
<CGS>                                            6,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    30
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    457
<INCOME-TAX>                                       148
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                302
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          (8)
<NET-INCOME>                                       294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.10


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the quarterly report of Geos Communications, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrew L. Berman,
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
            November
      15, 2010
            /s/ Andrew L. BermanAndrew
      L. BermanChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Meria James Bradley v. Robert F. Authur

Appellate case number: 01-15-00065-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-57020

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Appellant Meria James Bradley, an inmate, appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing 

his underlying civil action. On February 9, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that 

he has neither paid the $195 appellate filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of 

appellate costs. Appellant was further notified that the appeal would be dismissed unless the 

appellate filing fee was paid by March 11, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1 On February 27, 

2015, appellant filed an “Affidavit and Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis” but 

appellant’s filings fail to comply with the additional requirements of Chapter 14 of the Texas 

Civil Practices and Remedies Code governing inmate litigation.

Section 14.004 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code provides that an inmate 

who files an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay costs must file an additional 

affidavit or declaration identifying each prior lawsuit, other than an action under the Family 

Code, filed by the inmate without legal representation. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 

14.004(a). As to each prior lawsuit, the affidavit or declaration must specify the operative facts, 

the case name or style, the cause number, the court in which it was brought, the names of the 

parties, and the result of the suit. Id. If a previous action or claim was dismissed as frivolous or 

malicious, the affidavit or unsworn declaration of previous filings must state the date of any final 

judgment or order affirming the dismissal. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 14.004(b).

Appellant has not filed an additional affidavit or declaration relating to previous filings. 

Accordingly, this appeal may be dismissed without further notice unless, within 20 days of this 

order, appellant either (1) files all documents required by Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil 

Practices and Remedies Code or (2) pays the $195 appellate filing fee. See Gozowski v. 

T.D.C.J.–I.D., No. 12-14-00350-CV, 2014 WL 6983246, *1 (Tex. App.—Tyler Dec. 10, 2014, 

no pet.); Hickman v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice, No. 13-12-00437-CV, 2013 WL 3770916, at 

*2 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi July 18, 2013, no pet.); Douglas v. Turner, 441 S.W.3d 337, 339 

(Tex. App.—Waco May 9, 2013, no pet.).
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 26, 2015
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 24, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1079 Lower Tribunal No. F94-11235

________________ 

### Tracy McLin, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Diana Vizcaino, Judge. Tracy McLin, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
#### Clifford L. BENNETT, Appellant, v. Porter HOMER, as County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. 67-109.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 28, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Edward L. ANDRE and Lois E. Andre, his wife, Petitioners, v. BOSTON MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 67-680.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 27, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner** 

**v. JAMES ALLEN STEINER,**  **Respondent :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 1965 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**No. 103 DB 2013 Attorney Registration No.**  **39650 (Allegheny County)** 

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 7 th**  **day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the Report and**  **Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated June 18, 2015; it is hereby**  **ORDERED that James Allen Steiner is suspended from the Bar of this**  **Commonwealth for a period of one year retroactive to December 16, 2013, and he shall**  **comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay costs to**  **the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).**
# C_2012286EN.01000701.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5979 — KGHM/Tauron Wytwarzanie/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 286/06

On 23 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M5979. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M5979. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6100

DONTEZ JOHNSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. S. KALLIS; JARED RARDIN, Associate Warden; J. A. DUNN, Associate Warden; J. RIVERIA, M

- Unit Manager; F. ENTZEL, Warden; C. BENNETT, Correctional Officer; B. BENSON; A. HIGGINBOTTOM; C. MAGERKO; ROSENBURG, Case Manager M

- Unit; YONNUS, Case Manager M

- Unit; MS. MORGAN, Counselor M

- 4 Unit; W. BARR; P. FOLTZ; F. ARRMENTO; J. HANO; RELIGIOUS SERVICES; FCI HAZELTON; MID

- AT LANTIC REGIONAL DIRECTOR , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins

. John Preston Bailey , District Judge. ( 2:17

- cv - 00148

- JPB

- JPM )

Submitted : September 22, 2020 Decided: September 24, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dontez Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dontez Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed eral Bureau of
Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. W e have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Kallis , No. 2:17

- cv - 00148

- JPB

- JPM (N.D.W.V. Dec. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and leg al contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.44

               [LETTERHEAD OF GE CAPITAL COMMERCIAL FINANCE, INC.]

May 11, 2001

David Husband
VP Finance/CFO
Vodavi Communications Systems, Inc.
8300 East Raintree Dr.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260

     Re:  Waiver and Amendment of Credit Agreement

Dear David,

This Waiver and Amendment is written in response to your request for a waiver of
a default under Section 7.10(c) (Maximum Inventory Turnover Days covenant) and a
modification  of the  definition of EBITDA for the purposes of  calculating  the
Fixed Charge Coverage covenant in Section 7.10(b) of the Credit Agreement by and
between   General   Electric   Capital   Corporation   ("Lender")   and   Vodavi
Communications  Systems,  Inc. ("Vodavi") as amended and restated as of June 11,
1997 and as amended from time to time (the "Credit Agreement").

Per your  letter  dated  May 5,  2001  you have  indicated  that  Vodavi  was in
violation of the maximum inventory  turnover days covenant and that Vodavi would
recognize  approximately  $1.8 million in special  charges in the first  quarter
relating to a  restructuring  plan aimed at  reducing  the  company's  operating
expenses to coincide with its current sales outlook.

Pursuant to your request, Lender hereby waives the default under Section 7.10(c)
for the period ended March 31, 2001 and hereby amends the definition of "EBITDA"
to exclude the special  charges taken during the fiscal  quarter ended March 31,
2001 (in an amount not to exceed $1.8 million).

Except as  expressly  provided  in this  Waiver and  Amendment,  the  execution,
delivery,  and  effectiveness  of this  letter  agreement  shall not (i)  limit,
impair,  constitute a waiver of, or otherwise affect any right, power, or remedy
of Lender under the Loan Agreement or any other Loan Document, (ii) constitute a
waiver  of any  provision  in the Loan  Agreement  or in any of the  other  Loan
Documents, or (iii) alter, modify, amend, or in any way affect any of the terms,
conditions,  obligations,  convenants,  or  agreements  contained  in  the  Loan
Agreement,  all of which are  ratified  and  affirmed in all  respects and shall
continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  hereto have caused this  Amendment to be duly
executed by their  respective  duly  authorized  officers,  as of the date first
above written.


                                        VODAVI COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.


                                        By: /s/ David A. Husband
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: David A. Husband
                                            Title: CFO


                                        GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION


                                        By: /s/ Timothy J. Rafanello
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Timothy J. Rafanello
                                            Title: Duly Authorized Signatory
# C_2011370EN.01000301.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/3

---

Appointment of the First Advocate General

2011/C 370/05

At its meeting on 4 October 2011, the Court of Justice appointed Mr Mazák as First Advocate General for a period of one year expiring 6 October 2012, pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

---
#### Robert LOWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-735.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 8, 1971.

*751Lee R. Horton, Public Defender, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Public Defender, Winter Haven, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

Appellant Robert Lowman purports to appeal to this Court from an order entered by the Polk County Criminal Court of Record on September 11, 1970, denying his previously filed motion in said Court entitled “Motion for Jail Time In Mitigation Form”, which we construe to be a motion for an order granting jail time credit.

While no motion has been made to dismiss the appeal in this Court, it remains our duty to do so when it appears that we have no appellate jurisdiction in the case either because the appeal is from a nonap-pealable order or otherwise. We hold here that the attempted appeal by Lowman was from a non-appealable order. The case of James v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 226 So.2d 468, decided by this Court on September 19, 1969, is directly in point. In that case there was an attempted appeal on the part of James from an order denying a “Motion For An Order Granting Jail Time Credit”, and we dismissed the appeal ex mero motu as being impermissible under either F.S. § 924.06, F.S.A. or CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

Upon authority therefore of James v. State, supra, the appeal in the instant case is—

Dismissed ex mero motu.

HOBSON, J., concurs.

MANN, J., concurs in the result.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                          10,607
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  262,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,708
<INVENTORY>                                    356,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               715,049
<PP&E>                                         474,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                 416,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,548,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          363,088
<BONDS>                                        896,291
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,733
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,823)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,548,820
<SALES>                                      1,851,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,851,180
<CGS>                                        1,196,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,626,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (27,817)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                148,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,675
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             92,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,242)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                           EX-10

                                  BANCO POPULAR

July 31, 2000

Mr. James F. Callahan
Corporate Controller
Syratech Corporation P.O. Box 9114
E. Boston, MA  02128-9114

Dear Mr. Callahan:

We are pleased to confirm that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico has favorably
considered the renewal of the line of credit facilities available to Wallace
International de Puerto Rico, Inc. in the amount of $1,000,000.00, until May 31,
2001.

Please, be advised that the current Line of Credit Agreement with amendments and
guarantees will continue in full force and effect.

We trust this information is useful to you.

Cordially,





/s/  Jose Alfredo Moreda
      Vice President & Manager
      Mayaguez Commercial Banking Center (412)



c  E. Merle Randolph
   Pablo a. Toro
   Joffre Gomez
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH

DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL

PASO, TEXAS

DEREK HASSAN PRIDE,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

§

§ 

Appellant,

§

§

§ 

State.

§

No. 08-16-00313-CR 

Appeal from the

112th District Court

Of Upton County, Texas

(TC# 15-09-U1083-DPO)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s fourth motion for extension of time to file the 

brief until November 11, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Gonzalo P. Rios, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 11, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2017.

PER CURIAM 

Before McClure, CJ, Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12



                              DEAN HOLDING COMPANY

                        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                  TO FIXED CHARGES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
                     31, 2002, THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2001
   TO DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND FISCAL YEARS ENDED MAY 2001, 2000, 1999, AND 1998



<Table>
<Caption>
                                           Successor                                   Predecessor
                                          -----------       ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Year Ended              Period                     Fiscal Year Ended May
                                          December 31        from May 28, 2001     -----------------------------------------
                                             2002           to December 31, 2001     2001       2000       1999       1998
                                          -----------       --------------------   --------   --------   --------   --------

<S>                                        <C>                   <C>               <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income from continuing operations
  before taxes .........................    241,548               36,501           110,550    135,810     94,945    117,341
                                           --------              --------         --------   --------   --------   --------
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense .....................     56,287                38,655           74,053     50,147     39,098     21,101
  Portion of rentals (33%) .............     13,645                 8,963           14,924     14,181     12,488     11,029
                                           --------              --------         --------   --------   --------   --------
  Total fixed charges ..................     69,932                47,618           88,977     64,328     51,586     32,130
                                           --------              --------         --------   --------   --------   --------
Earnings from continuing operations
  before taxes and fixed charges .......    311,480                84,119          199,527    200,138    146,531    149,471
                                           ========              ========         ========   ========   ========   ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .....       4.45                  1.77             2.24       3.11       2.84       4.65
                                           ========              ========         ========   ========   ========   ========
</Table>