alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.11



 Exhibit 10.11 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This is an Amendment, dated and effective as of November 7, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), to the Executive Employment Agreement,
dated as of June 8, 2009, by and between Penn-America Insurance Company (“PAIC”) and Matthew B. Scott (the “Agreement”): 

WHEREAS, Global Indemnity plc (“Global Ireland”) entered into a Scheme of Arrangement (the “Scheme”) with Global
Indemnity Limited (“Global Cayman”), which was consummated on the Effective Date and which resulted in the replacement of Global Ireland by Global Cayman as the ultimate parent holding company of the Global Indemnity group of companies,
including PAIC, and the exchange of Global Ireland ordinary shares for Global Cayman ordinary shares on a one-for-one basis; and 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement to reflect such changes that are deemed necessary or appropriate to reflect the
consummation of the Scheme; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein and in the
Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is mutually acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement, effective as of the Effective Date, as follows: 

1. All references to “United America Indemnity, Ltd.,” “UAI,” “UAI, Ltd.,” and “UAI Ltd.” in the
Agreement shall instead be references to “Global Indemnity Limited,” all references to “UAI Board” in the Agreement shall instead be references to the “Board of Directors of Global Indemnity Limited (or its authorized
delegate),” and all references to “United America Indemnity Group, Inc.” in the Agreement shall instead be references to “Global Indemnity Group, Inc.” 

2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement, as so amended, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 

[signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Executive
Employment Agreement as of the Effective Date. 
  

			
		 	 /s/ Matthew B. Scott

	Name:	 	Matthew B. Scott
		
		 	PENN-AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas M. McGeehan

	Name:	 	Thomas M. McGeehan
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
From: Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:57 AM

To: Cassidy Mike

Subject: RE: 114 letter and enclosures

Dear Mike,

We agree that it is not necessary to measure PM 2.5 or condensables. We

also agree with your request that metals not be measured from glaze

lines.

As I indicated to you when we spoke on the phone, if dioxins are

me asured from any of your uncontrolled kilns, it will be necessary to

obtain dioxin data from the Spartanburg kiln while the scrubber is

operating. Such data would then be considered when determining

emissions associated with the MACT floor for existing un its, "beyond the

floor" emissions for existing units, and MACT for new units.

Even though the scrubber is not currently functioning, it is our

understanding that it remains as an existing control device that is

capable of being operated as it was during p rior tests. We would agree

with an approach wherein the Wisconsin and Texas facilities would be

tested first, with testing of the scrubber proceeding immediately if

dioxin is detected at kilns located at either of those two plants.

Jeff Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

(D243

- 02)

RTP, NC 27711

919

- 541

- 5427

919

- 541

- 5450 (FAX)

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243

- 02

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC 27709From: Cassidy Mike

Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:44 PM

To: Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: 114 letter and enclosures

Thanks Jeff. A question and a comment:

Based on our April 8 conversation, I understoo d that RM5 testing was

acceptable in place of PM2.5 testing, and that RM29 testing was not

needed at the spray booths as we can determine metals emissions based on

glaze HAP composition. This is not reflected in the ICR; what changed

since then on these m atters?

Also, as previously stated, we do not intend to notify any permitting

agencies about any ICR stack testing as this testing is not permit

required nor compliance demonstration and is outside their jurisdiction.

If you’d like permitting agencies to witness any ICR testing as

representatives of the Administrator, it’s your responsibility to notify

them.

Mike
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph GOINER v. Hayden J. DEES, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute.

No. 62497.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Joseph Goiner, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Orleans.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Bernard J. Bagert, Judge of the Criminal District Court, Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 14th day of July, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this *1303court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
#### Marion ROBERIE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Levie THOMAS et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 3786.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 16, 1972.

Marion Overton White, Opelousas, for defendants-appellants.

Preston N. Aucoin, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, HOOD, and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

The appellants did not appear in person or through counsel when this case was called for argument on the date it had been docketed for hearing, and no brief was filed in their behalf. The appeal, therefore, is considered abandoned, and, accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed. Beaver v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, 218 So.2d 677 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1969). Rule VII, § 5(b), Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal (1963), 8 LSA-R.S. page 392.

The costs of this appeal are assessed to defendants-appellants.

Appeal dismissed.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesInternational Population

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB12-131**
**Contact:**  Robert BernsteinPublic Information Office301-763-3030

Print versionFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, JULY 23, 2012U.S. Launches Interactive HIV/AIDS Database on Census.gov
The U.S. Census Bureau today launched an interactive global resource on the prevalence of HIV infection and AIDS cases and deaths. The database was developed in 1987 and now holds 149,000 statistics, an increase of approximately 10,800 new estimates in the last year, making it the most complete of its kind in the world. The launch comes as thousands of people worldwide meet in Washington, D.C., for the International AIDS Conference this week.

The resource is maintained by the Census Bureau with funding from the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator Ambassador Eric Goosby, head of PEPFAR, said on the launch, “This release of the HIV/AIDS database will expand global access to data that are critical to understanding the epidemic. This information is invaluable for the evidence-based response PEPFAR is championing.”

Census Bureau Director Robert Groves said “This database provides the people who need it with quality statistics — supporting the life-saving efforts of our partners at PEPFAR and USAID and the doctors, nurses and public health officials working to reach the end of AIDS.”

The tool is a library of statistics from more than 12,000 articles in international scientific and medical journals, individual countries' annual HIV/AIDS surveillance reports, and papers and posters presented at international conferences.

The menu-driven access tool permits users to search for statistical information in countries and territories across the world, as well as by subpopulation, geographic subarea (such as urban and rural), age, sex and year (back to 1960).

Statistics for the United States are available separately from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
-X-CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?   Source: U.S. Census Bureau |  Public Information Office |  PIO@census.gov |   Last Revised: May 19, 2016
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



The Board of Directors
Cotton States Life Insurance Company


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-30696) on Form S-8 of Cotton States Life Insurance Company of our report
dated February 24, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Cotton
States Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity,
comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1998, and all related schedules, which report appears
in the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of Cotton States Life
Insurance Company.


/s/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 1999



                                       61
# C_2013231EN.01000202.xml

| 9.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6891 — Agrofert/Lieken)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 231/04

On 15 May 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6891. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6891. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### BUCKLEY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD., Appellant, v. Irving TAGRIN, Appellee.

No. 72-319.

District. Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

*434Lopez, Hannon & Harris, Miami, for appellant.

Kahn & Clein, P. A., and Hugh L. Black, North Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal wherein defendant-appellant, Buckley Development Co., Ltd., seeks review of the lower court’s order finding- it in contempt in an action for damages. The contempt order was issued by the lower court due to the alleged failure of defendant to produce certain books and records as part of plaintiff’s, Irving Tagrin, discovery procedures. In defense of its actions defendant claimed that the books and records requested were not in its possession, custody or control and it was additionally claimed that those items sought were not sufficiently particularized or described.

RCP 1.350, 30 F.S.A., permits a court to order a party to produce any designated documents, papers, books, etc., which are in his possession, custody and control for the purpose of examination by his adversary as part of the discovery process. Pursuant to this rule a party not in possession or control of documents sought during discovery cannot be-held in contempt for failure to produce such documents. In addition, if the description of the items sought is too broad and lacks the sufficient specificity necessary for one to know what is demanded, no action can be taken against a party for his failure to produce the uncertain items. Hollywood Beach Hotel and Golf Club, Inc. v. Gilliland, 140 Fla. 24, 191 So. 30 (1939); Dade County v. Monroe, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 598; 10 Fla.Jur. Discovery § 8 (1956).

A review of the record on appeal discloses that the items sought by plaintiff were not sufficiently described nor were they in the possession or control of defendant. Therefore, the contempt order was improperly filed by the lower court and must be reversed.

Reversed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2988

To enhance the resources available to community development credit unions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. ORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To enhance the resources available to community

development credit unions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Union Commu5 nity Development Enhancement Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. POLICY.

7 It is the policy of the Congress to facilitate commu8 nity development through the enhancement of programs

9 which have proven to be successful in serving predomi10 nantly low income areas.
2

•HR 2988 IH

1 SEC. 3. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CREDIT UNION ASSIST2 ANCE.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Federal Credit Union Act is

4 amended by inserting after section 129 (12 U.S.C.

5 1772c)) the following new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 130. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REVOLVING LOAN

7 FUND FOR CREDIT UNIONS.

8 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

9 is authorized to be appropriated $25,000,000 for the pur10 poses of the Community Development Revolving Fund.

11 ‘‘(b) INVESTMENT OF FUNDS.—The Board may in12 vest any idle fund moneys in United States Treasury secu13 rities. Any interest accrued on such securities shall become

14 a part of the Fund.

15 ‘‘(c) AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any other provi16 sion of law, the Board may exercise the authority granted

17 it by the Community Development Credit Union Revolving

18 Fund Transfer Act (Public Law 99–609, section 1, No19 vember 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3475), including any additional

20 appropriations made and earnings accrued, subject only

21 to this section and to regulations prescribed by the

22 Board.’’.

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 120 of the

24 Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1766) is amended

25 by striking subsection (k).

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of World Airways, Inc.
certify that:  1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of World Airways,
Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: 11/12/04
    
    /s/ Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr.Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr.Chief Financial Officerof World Airways, Inc.
# C_2013318EN.01000101.xml

| 1.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6967 — BNP Paribas Fortis/Belgacom/Belgian Mobile Wallet)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 318/01

On 11 October 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6967. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6967. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          40,988
<SECURITIES>                                     2,515
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,164
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,772
<PP&E>                                           8,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,609
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           128
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,600
<SALES>                                          8,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,951
<CGS>                                              653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,832
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    19
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                       621
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,040
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
                                               


</TABLE>