alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013036EN.01001601.xml

| 8.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/16

---

AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND

2013/C 36/08

AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND — 2005

The annual average costs do not take into account the reduction of 20 % provided for in Articles 94(2) and 95(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 (1).

1

The net monthly average costs have been reduced by 20 %.

I.   Application of Article 94 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

Application of Article 94 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to the benefits in kind provided in 2005 to members of the family as referred to in Article 19(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (2) will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:

2

| | Annual | Net monthly |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ireland | EUR 3 691,51 | EUR 246,10 |

Annual

Net monthly

Ireland

EUR 3 691,51

EUR 246,10

II.   Application of Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

Application of Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to the benefits in kind provided in 2005 under Articles 28 and 28a of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 will be determined on the basis of the following average costs (only per capita from 2002):

| | Annual | Net monthly |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ireland | EUR 7 483,51 | EUR 498,90 |

Annual

Net monthly

Ireland

EUR 7 483,51

EUR 498,90

---

(1)  OJ L 74, 27.3.1972, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2.

2

---
#### William TRIPP, Appellant, v. Earl WILSON, Sr., as Executor, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 1973.

James R. Cunningham and Roe H. Wilkins of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando, for appellant.

William L. Eagan of Arnold, Matheny & Eagan, Orlando, for Appellee-Wilson, Sr., individually and executor.

Monroe E. McDonald and John Singer McEwan II of Sanders, McEwan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for Appellees-Pemberty, Hannis and Rinkard.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting).

I dissent because of my conviction that appellant’s complaint stated a cause of ac*441tion. The well pleaded allegations should be taken as true when considering a motion to dismiss — and if this were done— appellant would be entitled to the relief for which he prayed. It would be pointless inasmuch as the majority rationale is not expressed to explore the intricacies of this appeal by way of dissent. Suffice it to say that appellant’s position has merit and the decision unfavorable to him conflicts at the least with Norman v. Kannon, 1938, 133 Fla. 710, 182 So. 903.

I would reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate the complaint.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000038101-FEB-201308:05 AM
260 La. 1138

#### Kale VINING v. PHOENIX OF HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 52231.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 256 So.2d 698.

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Art. 7, Sec. 11, La.Const.1921.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mandeep K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|/s/ Mandeep K. Taneja                                                   
|Mandeep K. Taneja Chief Executive Officer and President November 6, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-27-2018]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 81--Portsmouth, New Hampshire; 
Authorization of Production Activity; Albany Safran Composites LLC; 
(Carbon Fiber Composite Aircraft Engine Parts); Rochester, New 
Hampshire

    On April 6, 2018, Albany Safran Composites LLC (ASC), submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within FTZ 81, in Rochester, New Hampshire. There is an 
application pending for FTZ designation at the ASC facility under FTZ 
81 (FTZ Docket S-97-2018).
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (83 FR 17644, April 23, 2018). On 
August 6, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: August 8, 2018.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17415 Filed 8-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Converted by EDGARwiz








AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 to Executive Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated as of October 21, 2016, is entered into by and among Viatar CTC Solutions Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Ilan Reich, an individual (the “Executive”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are party to an executive employment agreement, dated on or about May 23, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”);

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as more particularly set forth below; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:


1.

The third and fourth sentences of Section 5 are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced by the following which are hereby inserted in lieu thereof:




For purposes hereof, “Milestone Goal” shall mean (i) positive Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization, or EBITDA, for the Company’s last fiscal year, as reflected in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, and (ii) gross revenues of more than $20,000,000 for the Company’s last fiscal year, as reflected in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Bonus will be paid in stock, solely to the Executive, or, in the Executive’s sole discretion, fully or partially to employees and/or officers of the Company, in such amounts (up to the total amount of the Bonus) and to such employees and/or officers as designated by the Executive in writing to the Company.


2.

Except as modified herein, the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


3.

This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and shall be binding upon all parties, their successors and assigns, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment.  A signature delivered by facsimile shall constitute an original.

[Signature Page Follows]







			
	 
	 
	 

















[SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.

COMPANY

VIATAR CTC SOLUTIONS INC.

By: /s/ Ilan Reich

Name: Ilan Reich

Title: CEO




EXECUTIVE




/s/ Ilan Reich

Ilan Reich
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Richard P. Dutkiewicz, as Chief Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer of New World Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May  6, 2005 | By:                           | /s/ RICHARD  P. DUTKIEWICZ |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                | Richard P.  Dutkiewicz        |
|                | Chief  Financial Officer      |
|                | Principal  Accounting Officer |

 

----
#### Earline Roussell TRAPANI et al. v. CITY OF KENNER.

No. 62423.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: City of Kenner applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson. 357 So.2d 910.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., would grant a writ.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41843

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JOSHUA MICHAEL TRENT,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 704

Filed: August 28, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Michael E. Wetherell, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Joshua Michael Trent pled guilty to felony driving under the influence. I.C. §§ 18-8004, 

18-8005(6). The district court sentenced Trent to a unified term of eight years, with a minimum 

period of confinment of two and one-half years. Trent filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the 

district court denied. Trent appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 
2

record, we conclude no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order 

denying Trent’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the quarterly report of Geos Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrew L. Berman, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date:
May 13, 2011
/s/ Andrew L. BermanAndrew L. BermanChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, James R. Riedman, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Intentionally Omitted; 

4. TheRegistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: April 11, 2007 

A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
# C_2012332EN.01000801.xml

| 30.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 October 2012

2012/C 332/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2898 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 102,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4597 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80455 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6219 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2087 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4520 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 285,13 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1489 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5486 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3237 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2455 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2895 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9963 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5717 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5754 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 416,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2009 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0530 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5375 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 389,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9487 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,219 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5871 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,636 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6169 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8290 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7590 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2898

JPY

Japanese yen

102,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4597

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80455

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6219

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2087

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4520

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

285,13

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1489

RON

Romanian leu

4,5486

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3237

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2455

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2895

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9963

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5717

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5754

KRW

South Korean won

1 416,13

ZAR

South African rand

11,2009

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0530

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5375

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 389,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9487

PHP

Philippine peso

53,219

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5871

THB

Thai baht

39,636

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6169

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8290

INR

Indian rupee

69,7590

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2013251EN.01000101.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 August 2013

2013/C 251/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3235 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4594 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85395 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7503 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2310 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0905 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,735 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 300,78 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7028 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2633 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4320 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6868 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4820 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3936 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2627 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7041 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6867 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 468,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,6670 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0979 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5683 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 918,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3554 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,996 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,0050 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,557 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1122 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6158 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,8470 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3235

JPY

Japanese yen

130,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4594

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85395

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7503

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2310

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0905

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,735

HUF

Hungarian forint

300,78

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7028

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2633

RON

Romanian leu

4,4320

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6868

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4820

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3936

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2627

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7041

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6867

KRW

South Korean won

1 468,90

ZAR

South African rand

13,6670

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0979

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5683

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 918,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3554

PHP

Philippine peso

58,996

RUB

Russian rouble

44,0050

THB

Thai baht

42,557

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1122

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6158

INR

Indian rupee

87,8470

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. John S. KOZIOL, Appellee.

No. 72-367.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 26, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
260 La. 1133

#### Mary H. Eason PHILLIPS v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC FOOD STORES et al.

No. 52199.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Mrs. Mary Phillips applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 256 So.2d 652.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we cannot say the result is incorrect.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Cleveland HARRIS v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 61406.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Cleveland Harris, applying for writs of certiorari and review. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
EXHIBIT 21

			  SUBSIDIARIES

		                  DATRON SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
                          			SUBSIDIARIES

                    		       MARCH 31, 2000


                           				       Percentage of        Jurisdiction
				                                 Voting Securities        in which
Name                                  Owned by Parent       Incorporated

Datron World Communications Inc.           100%              California

Datron/Transco Inc.                        100%              California

  Datron Resources Inc. (a wholly
  owned subsidiary of
  Datron/Transco Inc.)                     100%              California

Datron/Trans World Communications
Int'l Ltd. (a Foreign Sales
Corporation)                               100%               U.S. Virgin
							                                                         Islands
# Trading Day Methodology

# Trading Day Diagnostics