alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2934 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2934

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that the 
  Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands shall be covered under the 
   minimum wage provisions of that Act on the same basis as American 
                                 Samoa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 1993

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that the 
  Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands shall be covered under the 
   minimum wage provisions of that Act on the same basis as American 
                                 Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDUSTRY COMMITTEES.

    (a) Section 5.--Section 5 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 
(29 U.S.C. 205) is amended--
            (1) in the title, by inserting and commonwealth of northern 
        mariana islands after american samoa, and
            (2) in the first sentence, by inserting ``and in the 
        Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands'' after ``American 
        Samoa'', and
            (3) in the second sentence, by inserting ``or the 
        Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, as the case may be,'' 
        after ``American Samoa'' each place it appears.
    (b) Section 6.--Section 6(a)(3) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 
1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(3)) is amended by inserting ``or in the 
Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands'' after ``American Samoa''.
    (c) Section 8.--Section 8 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 
(29 U.S.C. 208) is amended--
            (1) in the title, by inserting and the commonwealth of 
        northern mariana islands after american samoa, and
            (2) in subsection (a), by inserting ``and in the 
        Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands'' after ``American 
        Samoa'' each place it occurs, and
            (3) in subsection (b), by inserting ``or in the 
        Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands'' after ``in American 
        Samoa'' and by inserting ``or the Commonwealth of Northern 
        Mariana Islands'' after ``of American Samoa''.

                                 <all>
```
# C_2013231EN.01000201.xml

| 9.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6697 — OW Bunker/Bergen Bunkers)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 231/03

On 11 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6697. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6697. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 11

- 00802

- CV

Robert David NALBACH

, Appellant

v.

Stephanie Dawn NALBACH

, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010

- CI

- 14091

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

It is ORDERED that appellee Stephanie Dawn Nalbach recover her costs of this appeal

from appellant Robert David Nalbach.

SIGNED April 17, 2013.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
# C_2012126EN.01000101.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/1

---

2012/C 126/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 118, 21.4.2012

OJ C 118, 21.4.2012

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 109, 14.4.2012

OJ C 89, 24.3.2012

OJ C 80, 17.3.2012

OJ C 73, 10.3.2012

OJ C 65, 3.3.2012

OJ C 58, 25.2.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### Harry Kaye, Plaintiff, *v.*Irwin A. Shane et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 21, 1953.

*Sale a Sale*for defendants.

*Sidney H. Rosen*for plaintiff.

Dickstein, J.

Motion for reargument is granted. Upon such reargument the original decision is recalled and defendants’ motion to dismiss the first cause of action of the amended complaint is granted. The first cause sounds in unlawful arrest and false imprisonment. Although there are general allegations that defendants caused and procured plaintiff’s arrest, these allegations are found in conjunction with allegations that the arrest was made after a magistrate had ordered a complaint. If the arrest followed action by a magistrate, defendants cannot be held liable for false arrest and imprisonment, whatever their liability might be for malicious prosecution. In the cases of *Vallon*v. *Ramage*(196 Misc. 740); *Zeichner*v. *Pludwin*(81 N. Y. S. 2d 300), and *Davern*v. *Drew*(153 App. Div. 844, affd. 214 N. Y. 681) (relied upon by plaintiff), the arrests were made by police officers at the instigation or procurement of the defendants. However, where a court has authorized an arrest, the acts of the.court are not those of the complainant in the case and there can be no charge against him for false imprisonment. (See Prosser on Torts, p. 74, and Salmond on the Law of Torts *83[10th ed.], p. 332.) The first cause of action is deficient in not alleging how plaintiff was arrested, i.e., whether arrested under valid process or by a police officer at the instigation and procurement of the defendants.

The complaint should inform the defendants of the charges they are to meet and not obscure them in ambiguity. The present pleading, in the first cause of action fails to allege sufficiently the facts upon which the conclusory statements, that defendants procured the arrest of the plaintiff, are based.

The first cause is therefore dismissed with leave to plaintiff to serve a further amended complaint, if he is so advised, which shall adequately plead the facts concerning plaintiff’s arrest, within twenty days after service of a copy of the order to he entered hereon, with notice of entry. Settle order.
# C_2013355EN.01000301.xml

| 5.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6851 — Baxter International/Gambro)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 355/02

On 22 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6851. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6851. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
#### TARAN DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, and Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, Cross-Respondents, v. George SKINNER and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents, Cross-Petitioner.

No. 35971.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 26, 1967.

Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, for petitioners, cross-respondents.

Charles F. Lindsay, Miami, for respondent, cross-petitioner.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 25, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, cross-petition, the record’and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

Attorney’s fees in the amount of $250.00 are granted.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Order entered February 13, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01222
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF D .C. AND Q.C., CHILDR EN On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 0 1053
- 2013 

### O RDER The clerk’s and reporter’s records are past due. On January 12, 2015, we granted appellant an extension to February 23, 2015 to file the records. Before the Court is appellant’s February 11, 2015 second motion seeking a sixty

- day extens ion of time to file the clerk’s record and reporter’s record. We GRANT the motion as follows:
We ORDER Andrea Stroh Thompson, Collin County District Clerk, to file, by MARCH 16, 2015 , either: (1) the clerk’s record; or (2) written verification that app ellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We caution appellant that, if the Court receives written notification of no payment or payment arrangements, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution without further notice

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).
We ORDER Shawn Gant, Official Court Reporter for the 429th Judicial District Court of Collin County, Texas, to file, by MARCH 23, 2015 , either: (1) the reporter’s record; or (2) written verification that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’srecord. We caution appellant that if the Court receives written verification of no payment or payment arrangements, the Court will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic transmission to Andrea Stroh Thompson, Shawn Gant, appellant, and counsel for appellee. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
# C_2013115EN.01000601.xml

| 23.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 April 2013

2013/C 115/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3037 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,00 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4549 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85630 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5139 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2188 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6090 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,930 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,79 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7002 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1079 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3573 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3515 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2696 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3375 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1221 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5461 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6161 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 459,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1109 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0592 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6020 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 667,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9746 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,888 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,2138 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,377 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6237 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0012 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,5910 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3037

JPY

Japanese yen

130,00

DKK

Danish krone

7,4549

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85630

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5139

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2188

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6090

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,930

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,79

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7002

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1079

RON

Romanian leu

4,3573

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3515

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2696

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3375

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1221

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5461

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6161

KRW

South Korean won

1 459,94

ZAR

South African rand

12,1109

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0592

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6020

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 667,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9746

PHP

Philippine peso

53,888

RUB

Russian rouble

41,2138

THB

Thai baht

37,377

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6237

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0012

INR

Indian rupee

70,5910

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Population
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.02 **Contact:**
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, FEB. 2, 2011 State Population Estimates: April 1, 2010 The Census Bureau is releasing a preliminary set of April 1, 2010, estimates of total population for the nation, states and Puerto Rico. An Internet table will show the estimates in comparison with official April 1, 2010, Census counts released in December 2010. The estimates are based on the 2000 Census and were prepared using the current estimates methodology without knowledge of 2010 Census results. An additional Internet table will show preliminary estimates of the July 1 populations for each year since the 2000 Census. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/popest/>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
June 9, 2015 

Mr. Mathew Berman 

LA Sky Aerials 

377 Fresh Meadows Road 

Simi Valley, CA 93065 

Dear Mr. Berman: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your March 10, 2015, exemption request on behalf of LA Sky Aerials into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2015-0573), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINING SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT FEBRUARY 28, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           3,909
<SECURITIES>                                    11,663
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                       560
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,031
<PP&E>                                          17,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,396
<BONDS>                                             10
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,072
<SALES>                                         18,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,733
<CGS>                                            2,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,896
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (87)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  95
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,385)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,535)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,535)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00468-CR

Allen Lee Polk

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (1226888D)

July 3, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of CFC
International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory M. Jehlik, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2005 |  | /s/ Gregory M. Jehlik                
|                     |  | Gregory M. Jehlik                    
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided by CFC International, Inc., and will be retained by CFC International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



31