alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Essco BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-949.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 15, 1973.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

SMITH, CULVER, Associate Judge.

This appeal seeks reversal of a judgment of conviction, sentence and revocation of probation, all' entered in the Court of Record in and for Brevard County, Florida. Appellant, on July 12, 1970, had been charged with breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. After first pleading not guilty, he later changed his plea to guilty of the lesser included offense of breaking and entering with intent to commit petit larceny. The Court accepted this plea, withheld adjudication of guilt, and entered an order placing Appellant on probation.

On April 17, 1972, Appellant was charged with violating his probation, and on hearing his probation was revoked and he was sentenced to confinement for a period of five years.

Appellant has framed three points on appeal, but only point III need be considered since Appellee concedes it to be well taken and concludes in its brief that the judgment of conviction and sentence must be reversed for a new hearing on probation violation. We agree.

*584A review of the record reveals that the instant case falls squarely within the holding of Hooks v. State, Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 459. No hearing, as contemplated by Florida Statute ch. 948, was held. The cause must be returned to the Court below for a proper hearing, after the required notice, on probation violation.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
#### Gardenia DeARMAS et al., Appellants, v. Nathan BLONSTEIN and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 77-1022.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 4, 1978.

*1340H. C. Starkweather, Miami, for appellants.

Petersen & Feder, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs below from an order dismissing an action filed by them on April 28, 1976 for damages for personal injuries received by appellant, Gardenia DeArmas, as a result of an automobile accident alleged to have been caused by the defendant, Nathan Blonstein, against whom, with his indemnity liability insurer, the action was brought.

The defendant-insurer filed an answer denying coverage. On September 14, 1976, the attorneys for the defendant-insurer filed a suggestion of death, stating that the said Nathan Blonstein had died prior to the filing of the complaint. He had died in January of 1976, some three months prior to the filing of the action.

On February 1, 1977, the defendant-insurer filed a motion to dismiss. There was no substitution of parties. See: Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.260(a)(1) and (2). The motion was granted by an order wherein the court stated: “and judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiffs, with costs to be hereafter taxed, and the Plaintiff shall go hence without day”.

Appealing therefrom, appellant contends the dismissal of the action was error. We hold no error was thereby committed, but amend the dismissal order to be one without prejudice.

Judgment affirmed as amended.
# C_2014078EN.01000101.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/1

---

2014/C 78/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 71, 8.3.2014

OJ C 71, 8.3.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 61, 1.3.2014

OJ C 52, 22.2.2014

OJ C 45, 15.2.2014

OJ C 39, 8.2.2014

OJ C 31, 1.2.2014

OJ C 24, 25.1.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Anthony J. Bettencourt, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Verity, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: January 9, 2004



|/s/ ANTHONY J. BETTENCOURT           
|-------------------------------------
|Anthony J. Bettencourt               
|Chief Executive Officer and President
# C_2012339EN.01000702.xml

| 7.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6732 — Triton/European Directories)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 339/04

On 26 October 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6732. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6732. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 12
- 00124
- CR BILLY JOE HARRIS , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 278th District Court Leon County, Texas Trial Court No. CM
- 11 - 50

ORDER
On April 3, 2003, the State filed the "State's Amended Motion to Redact Record of All Victim's Identifying Information" seeking to redact identifying information of victims pursuant to Code of Criminal P rocedure article 57.02. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 57.02. In that motion the State seeks to redact any social security numbers of three victims contained in three exhibits admitted during the trial, numbers 1117, 1134, and
1148. This Court ab ated this proceeding for the trial court to conduct a hearing toHarris v. State Page 2

determine which portions of the record or exhibits should be redacted, if any. After a hearing conducted by the trial court, the trial court determined that the exhibits should
be redacted t o remove social security numbers of the three victims as follows: State's Exhibit number 1117 on page 1 State's Exhibit number 1134 on page 1 State's Exhibit number 1148 on pages 1 and 15 The trial court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law that the record should be redacted prior to the record being sent to Harris. The trial court's findings are approved and the State's motion is granted. Appellate counsel for Harris is hereby ordered to ensure that the social security
numbers of the victims in the exhibits set forth above are redacted from the record prior to submitting a copy of the record to Harris as required by the procedures set forth in Anders v. California . Counsel is further ordered to send the redacted record to Harris within ten ( 10) days of the date of this Order. Counsel is further ordered to send this Court proof of delivery to Harris within five (5) days of the date of delivery. Harris has filed several motions to extend the time to file his response to
counsel's motion to withdraw. Those motions are granted to the extent that Harris's response to appellate counsel's motion to withdraw and brief in support is due within 45 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAMHarris v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and J ustice Scoggins Order issued and filed on June 27, 2013 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony J. Merante, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Brooklyn Cheesecake &
Desserts Company, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 21, 2005

/s/ Anthony J. Merante
------------------------------------
Anthony J. Merante
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Robert R. FRANK, as Trustee, Appellant, v. LAND SERVICES, INC., Land Services Sebring, Inc., Orange Blossom Estates, Inc., Anna Devinsky, Dian Devins, and Imperial Corporation, Appellees.

No. 78-514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 26, 1978.

*1305Peter Strelkow, of Frank, Strelkow *&*Gay, North Bay Village, for appellant.

J. Hardin Peterson, Jr., of Peterson, Myers, Craig, Crews, Brandon & Mann, Lakeland, for appellees.

OTT, Judge,

We reverse that portion of the order of the trial court fixing and allowing attorney’s fees to Mr. J. Hardin Peterson, Jr. and remand the case for further proceedings in order to delete from such award any sums included therein for services rendered on appeal.1

SCHEB, A. C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

1

. While Section 59.46, Fla.Stat. (1977) now provides for attorney’s fees to the prevailing party on appeal, that provision was not in effect at the time the trial court awarded fees in this case. See *Ohio Realty*Investment *Corp. v. Southern Bank of West Palm Beach,*300 So.2d 679 (Fla.1974).
EXHIBIT 32.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of International Wire Group,
Inc. (the "Company "), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (i)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 10, 2007                           /s/ RODNEY D. KENT
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name: Rodney D. Kent
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer
U
. S
. Deportment o f T ransportation Federal Aviation Administration 

## MAR 0 3 2016

Paul M
. Egan , CEO Aero Medical Products Mf g., Inc. 223 0 Stonebrid ge Rd West Bend , WI 53095 Dear Mr. Egan: Transport Airp l ane D i rectorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S.W
. Renton , Washington 98057-3356

We have received yo ur petition for exemption lette r dat e d February 2 , 20 1 6 , request in g rel ie f from the req uireme nts of Title 14 , Code of Federal Re gulations (14 CFR) 25. 562 , and 25.7 85(b). The exemptio n , if granted, wou ld a ll ow installation of med i cal- patient litter assemb li es in Gu l fs tream Model Gal axy a nd G-2 00 business j e t s. We have su b mitted your petition to the Department of Tran sportation ' s Federal Documen t Management System on your b e hal f(docket no. FAA

- 2016

- 4358 at www.regu lations.gov). We w ill adv i se yo u of our fina l dec i s ion on you r petition as soon as possible. If yo u h ave any que stio n s or co ncerns regarding your p e tit ion o r the pet ition proce s s , please co ntact D an J acquet at (425) 227-2676 , e -m a il dan.jacquet @ faa.gov. S inc ere l y,

Mark Forseth Transport Airpla n e D i rectorate Aircraft Certification Service
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Switzerland
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LSP-WHITEWATER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AS OF AND FOR THE
THREE MONTH AND SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,746
<PP&E>                                           8,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,124
<BONDS>                                        177,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                            736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,118
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,320
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,034
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,764
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Dulovich, Joseph R." <JDulovich@rrienergy.com> Date: 7/21/2010 12:39 PM Subject: Re: RRI New Castle Request for Extension Attachments: pic08326.gif; New Castle Extension Request Letter 7-2-10.doc

Greetings, EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the RRI Energy New Castle Plant. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire. If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic08326.gif)

From: "Dulovich, Joseph R." <JDulovich@rrienergy.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Frank, Stephen" <SFrank@rrienergy.com>, "Whelan, Kerry M." <KWhelan@rrienergy.com>

Date: 07/02/2010 12:39 PM Subject: RRI New Castle Request for Extension

Please find attached a request for an extension for submitting the ICR data. Sincerely,

Joe Dulovich RRI Energy New Castle Plant(See at tached file: New Castle Extension Request Letter 7-2-10.doc)