alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014376EN.01000202.xml

| 23.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/2

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 376/03

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 16.9.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 16.9.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or group of stocks | SOL/8AB. |
| Species | Common sole (solea solea) |
| Zone | VIIIa and VIIIb |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 53/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

16.9.2014

Duration

16.9.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Spain

Stock or group of stocks

SOL/8AB.

Species

Common sole (solea solea)

solea solea

Zone

VIIIa and VIIIb

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

53/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
260 La. 1137

#### Ambrose THERIOT et al. v. LA-TERRE COMPANY, Inc.

No. 52222.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Ambrose Theriot, et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne. 256 So.2d 710.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
City and CountyOrdinances
# C_2011283EN.01001001.xml

| 27.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/10

---

Call for proposals under the 2012 work programme ‘People’ of the Seventh EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2011/C 283/06

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2012 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following calls and a prize. Call deadlines and budgets are given in the call texts, which are published on the relevant European Commission website.

‘People’ Specific Programme:

‘People’ Specific Programme:

| Call title | Call identifier |
| --- | --- |
| Researchers’ Night | FP7-PEOPLE-2012-NIGHT |

Call title

Call identifier

Researchers’ Night

FP7-PEOPLE-2012-NIGHT

This call for proposals relates to the 2012 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2011) 5033 of 19 July 2011.

Information on the modalities of the calls and the prize, the work programmes and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the relevant European Commission website.

---
#### Robert Gene CARSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 27, 1967.

*341Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Marvin J. Emory, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against for the larceny of:

> “ * * * one certain motorcycle which is propelled by gasoline or kerosene, to-wit: 1965 HONDA MOTORCYCLE, a further and more particular description of said motorcycle being to the State Attorney unknown, the property of one BILLIE ANDERSON, which property was in the lawful custody, care or control of one RONNIE ANDERSON, as custodian. * * * ”

He was found guilty after a non-jury trial and was placed on probation for a period of two and one-half years. He now appeals his conviction.

The main thrust of appellant’s argument is that the State failed to meet the burden of proof in that there was no evidence admitted which identified the motorcycle found in his possession as the motorcycle described in the information. We have examined the record and find that appellant is correct and that there is no such testimony. It is conceded that appellant’s conviction, if it is sustained, must stand upon the unexplained possession of recently stolen property. See Kearson v. State, 123 Fla. 324, 166 So. 832 (1936).

The evidence here is simply that a motorcycle was found in appellant’s possession and that a 1965 Honda motorcycle was stolen at a certain time and place. The victim of the theft identified a motorcycle in Opa Locka as the one that was stolen from him, but the State completely failed to show that the motorcycle identified at Opa Locka was the one found in appellant’s possession. See Smith v. State, 139 Fla. 558, 190 So. 696 (1939); Morgan v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 795.

It being apparent that the State has failed to prove a prima facie case, the Court erred in failing to direct a verdict for the defendant. The judgment is therefore reversed.

Reversed.
Exhibit 32

 

FORM OF 906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

David G. Whalen, the Chief Executive Officer and Kevin F. Mahoney, the Chief Financial Officer of A.T. Cross Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
#### Brinkley BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1090.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 28, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Criminal Justice Division, Orange County; W. Rogers Turner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2013258EN.01000201.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6956 — Telefónica/CaixaBank/Banco Santander/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 258/03

On 14 August 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6956. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6956. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
# C_2014062EN.01000901.xml

| 4.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/9

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2014/C 62/08

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Slovenia

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Slovenia

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Slovenia

Subject of commemoration: The 600th anniversary of the crowning of Barbara Celjska

Description of the design: The central image of the coin shows, with lined pattern, the portrait of the Queen Barbara of Celje with her sceptre. On the image are placed three typical six-pointed stars of Celje counts. On the left side of the portrait is the inscription ‘SLOVENIJA’ and on the right side the inscription ‘BARBARA CELJSKA’ and the years ‘1414-2014’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 1 million

Date of issue: October 2014

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 7, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-00793-CV SCHYYRA HAYES, Appellant V. FRANK M. D'ALESSANDRO, KIPEN IE ANNE D'ALESSANDRO, A.P. INVESTMENTS, LLC, LIONE L AUSTIN, JR., Appellees On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-05514-2017



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, J ustice Whitehill, and Justice Molb erg Opinion by Chief Justice Burns We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from the trial court’s June 14, 2019 order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment as it did not a ppear the judgment resolved all claims. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (subject to mostly statutory exceptions, appellate c ourt has jurisdiction over app eals from final judgments that dispose of all parties and claims). We directed appellant to f ile a letter brief addressing our concern, but more than ten days have passed, and she has not re sponded. The summary judgment from which appellant appeals disposed of h er claims against appellees and determined appellees were entitled to attorney’s fees. However, it did not determine the amount of fees or address counterclaims asserted against ap pellant, and nothing in the record–2– before us reflects those claims have been resolved. Accordingl y, we lack jurisdict ion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a); Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195.

190793F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
SCHYYRA HAYES, Appellant
No. 05-19-00793-CV V. FRANK M. D'ALESSANDRO, KIPENIE ANNE D'ALESSANDRO, A.P. INVESTMENTS, LLC, LIONEL AUSTIN, JR., Appellees On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-05514-2017. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered October 7, 2019.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from a) the
condensed consolidated balance sheet at November 30, 1996 (unaudited) and the
consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended November 30, 1996
(unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such (b) financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,593
<SECURITIES>                                    23,481
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                       491
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,400
<PP&E>                                          16,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,356
<BONDS>                                            401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,774
<SALES>                                         16,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,408
<CGS>                                            1,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   258
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,061)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,061)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,061)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
Household Expenditures for Food at Home: 2008-2009

 Average annual amount Percentage of total

Area spent for food at home expenditures

United States $3,749 7.5

Northeast $4,032 7.4

Boston 4,905 8.3

New York 4,066 6.7

Philadelphia 3,805 6.7

South $3,488 7.5

Washington, D.C. 4,160 6.0

Miami 3,741 7.9

Houston 3,649 6.2

Dallas-Fort Worth 3,600 6.7

Baltimore 3,300 6.3

Atlanta 2,717 5.9

Midwest $3,605 7.6 

Chicago 4,250 7.5

Detroit 3,944 8.0 

Minneapolis-St. Paul 3,942 7.0

Cleveland 3,642 7.9

West $4,081 7.5 

Los Angeles 4,260 7.5

Seattle 4,596 7.0 

San Francisco 4,280 6.3

San Diego 3,644 6.8

Phoenix 3,596 6.7

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

-X-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UTILX CORPORATION FOR JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             561
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                       530
<INVENTORY>                                      5,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,834
<PP&E>                                          41,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,281
<SALES>                                         27,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,015
<CGS>                                           24,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    283
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                283
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       283
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
#### NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL BANK OF MIAMI, a national banking corporation of the United States of America, Appellant, v. Verdell FORBES, a single woman, and Carrie Forbes, a single woman, Appellees.

No. 72-381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1972.

Richard Krinzman, Peter Strelkow, and Robert R. Frank, of Frank, Strelkow & Marx, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Elliott Noel Zack, of Leff, Pesetsky & Zack, North Miami Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to clearly appear. The final judgment finding for the defendants is affirmed except to the extent as hereinafter modified. Inasmuch as the record reflects that the real property which was the res of the action for specific performance was conveyed to a third party, this cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination as to whether a decree of *427specific performance can be rendered in light of such conveyance. 29A Fla.Jur. Specific Performance § 51. Should the trial court find that it is impossible to grant the equitable relief requested then in that event the trial court shall be authorized to conduct an evidentiary hearing for the purpose of ascertaining and awarding damages incidental to the main relief sought. See Miller v. Rolfe, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 132.

Affirmed, as modified and remanded with instructions.

WALDEN, CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
This site uses Cascading Style Sheets to present information. Therefore, it may not display properly when disabled.

This site requires Javascript enabled to retrieve and display data.

# U.S. Census Bureau		Most Populous	

### 

 | 

###
# C_2014033EN.01000301.xml

| 5.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 February 2014

2014/C 33/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3519 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4623 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82905 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8231 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2215 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,530 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,32 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2045 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4482 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0411 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5195 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4970 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4969 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6570 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7152 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 462,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0304 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1963 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6570 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 496,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4999 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,259 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,4312 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,302 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2640 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1121 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,5310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3519

JPY

Japanese yen

137,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4623

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82905

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8231

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2215

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,530

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,32

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2045

RON

Romanian leu

4,4482

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0411

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5195

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4970

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4969

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6570

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7152

KRW

South Korean won

1 462,27

ZAR

South African rand

15,0304

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1963

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6570

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 496,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4999

PHP

Philippine peso

61,259

RUB

Russian rouble

47,4312

THB

Thai baht

44,302

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2640

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1121

INR

Indian rupee

84,5310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Children
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-109 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, JUNE 19, 2012 Monthly Child Support Payments Average $430 per Month in 2010, Census Bureau Reports Monthly child support payments in the United States averaged $430 per month in 2010, according to new U.S. Census Bureau statistics. The statistics from Support Providers: 2010 show that 59 percent of the $41.7 billion in total payments were for child support for children under 21 ($24.4 billion), which was paid by 4.8 million parents. The remainder was paid to children over 21, parents, and other relatives or nonrelatives of the providers. Monetary support in 2010 was primarily for children, although it also included support for other nonhousehold members, such as parents or other relatives. The statistics for these tables come from the Survey of Income and Program Participation, a national survey designed to provide comprehensive details about the social and economic well-being of individuals and households. Other highlights include: Child support payments averaged $5,150 annually, or $430 per month.

About 85 percent of child support providers were male and 15 percent were female.

Annual child support payments averaged $5,450 from male providers and $3,500 from female providers.

About three of every four child support providers had some type of an agreement or court order for support.

About six-in-10 child support providers paid support for one child, three-in-10 supported two children, and the remaining one-in-10 supported three or more children.

About 2.1 million providers supported people other than their children younger than 21, with 32 percent of these providing support for their parents.  The data were collected from May through August 2010 in the Survey of Income and Program Participation. As in all surveys, the data are subject to sampling and nonsampling error. For further information on the source of the data and accuracy of the estimates, including standard errors and confidence intervals, go to <https://www.census.gov/sipp/source.html>.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy