alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                      Dean Foods Company and Subsidiaries


                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
                       ---------------------------------
                     (In thousands, except per share data)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             1997            1996             1995
                                           ---------       ----------       ---------
<S>                                        <C>            <C>               <C>
Net Income (Loss)                           $86,704        $(49,688)         $80,059
                                            =======        ========          =======


Weighted Average Number of
  common shares outstanding
  during the period                          40,181          40,122           39,890
                                            =======        ========          =======


Primary Earnings (Loss)
  Per Common Share                          $  2.16        $  (1.24)         $  2.01
                                            =======        ========          =======
</TABLE>






                                      121
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

                               September 6, 2000

adam.com, Inc.
1600 RiverEdge Parkway
Suite 800
Atlanta, Georgia 30328

    RE:  ADAM.COM, INC. REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-3

Ladies and Gentlemen:

    We have acted as counsel for adam.com, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the
"Company"), in connection with the preparation of a Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement") to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission relating to 1,200,000 Purchase Shares and 154,286 First
Tranche Commitment Shares, each as defined in and to be issued pursuant to that
certain Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2000 by and
between the Company and Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC (collectively, the
"Shares").

    As such counsel, we have examined and relied upon such records, documents,
certificates and other instruments as in our judgment are necessary or
appropriate to form the basis for the opinions hereinafter set forth. In all
such examinations, we have assumed the genuineness of signatures on original
documents and the conformity to such original documents of all copies submitted
to us as certified, conformed or photographic copies, and as to certificates of
public officials, we have assumed the same to have been properly given and to be
accurate.

    The opinions expressed herein are limited in all respects to the corporate
law of the State of Georgia and no opinion is expressed with respect to the laws
of any other jurisdiction or any effect where such laws may have on the opinions
expressed herein. This opinion is limited to the matters stated herein, and no
opinion is implied or may be inferred beyond the matters expressly stated
herein.

    Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Shares will be
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

    This opinion is given as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to
advise you after the date hereof of facts and circumstances that come to our
attention or changes in the law that occur which could affect the opinions
contained herein. This letter is being rendered solely for the benefit of
adam.com, Inc. in connection with the matters addressed herein. This opinion may
not be furnished or relied upon by any person or entity for any purpose without
our prior written consent.

    We consent to the filing of this opinion as an Exhibit to the Registration
Statement.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          King & Spalding
# C_2012154EN.01000301.xml

| 31.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 May 2012

2012/C 154/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2438 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 98,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4312 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79775 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9555 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5145 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,658 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6982 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3873 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4675 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2930 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2729 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2784 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6551 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6402 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5948 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 465,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5086 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8920 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5555 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 976,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9329 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,116 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5650 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,627 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4921 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3868 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,9420 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2438

JPY

Japanese yen

98,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4312

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79775

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9555

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5145

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,658

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6982

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3873

RON

Romanian leu

4,4675

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2930

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2729

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2784

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6551

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6402

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5948

KRW

South Korean won

1 465,19

ZAR

South African rand

10,5086

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8920

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5555

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 976,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9329

PHP

Philippine peso

54,116

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5650

THB

Thai baht

39,627

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4921

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3868

INR

Indian rupee

69,9420

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2013263EN.01000201.xml

| 12.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6971 — Warburg Pincus/General Atlantic/Santander/Santander Asset Management)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 263/03

On 22 August 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6971. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6971. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-148 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, AUG. 8, 2012 Media Advisory — Census Bureau to Demo Mobile App with Economic Indicators What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau will provide a media demonstration of its first mobile app, America’s Economy, prior to its launch. The mobile app combines 16 economic indicators and other economic statistics from the Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and will provide updates to a user’s smartphone or tablet. The app will be available Thursday for Android mobile devices and will be available for Apple users in the coming weeks.
 When:
 Thursday, Aug. 9
Session 1--8:45 to 9:30 a.m. (EDT) 
Session 2--10:15 to 11:15 a.m. (EDT)
 Who:
 William Bostic Jr., associate director, Economic Programs, U.S. Census BureauMark Wallace, chief, Services Sector Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau
Stephen Buckner, chief, Center for New Media and Promotions, U.S. Census Bureau
 Where:
 U.S. Department of Commerce 
  Room 5074 (Economic Indicator Lock Up Room)
  1401 Constitution Ave., NW
  Washington, DC 20052
 Details:
 Please RSVP by 5 p.m. (EDT), Wednesday, Aug. 8 to the Public Information Office at 301-763-3030 or to <pio@census.gov> For more information about the release of the mobile app, please visit <http://blogs.census.gov/2012/07/25/pardon-our-dust-census-gov-transformation/>.
  Follow @uscensusbureau on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and Ustream
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Income & Wealth
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.11 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, MARCH 8, 2012 Household Income Inequality Within U.S. Counties: 2006-2010 This report presents measures of household income inequality for counties in the United States, based on data pooled from 5 years (2006 to 2010) of American Community Survey (ACS) data. For example, the data show that the more unequal counties were also more populous. Thirty-four percent of Americans lived in a county that ranked in the top 20 percent of U.S. counties by Gini index (the Gini index is a measure of income inequality). In every region, the counties in the most unequal fifth of U.S. counties accounted for a disproportionately large share of that region's population. For example, only 8 percent of Midwestern counties had Gini indexes ranking among the top fifth of U.S. counties, but they contained 26 percent of the region's population. Also, the South region had a disproportionately large number of counties with high income inequality, while counties in the Midwest had lower levels of income inequality. Specifically, 32 percent of the counties in the South had Gini indexes ranking among the top fifth of U.S. counties, while 31 percent of Midwest counties ranked among the bottom fifth of U.S. counties. 
  Internet address: 
<https://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/acsbr10-18.pdf>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>
  
                                                 Exhibit 10(d)
  
  THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM
  CORPORATION RETIREMENT PLAN, made on this 18th day
  of December, 1997 BY CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM
  CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation:
  
                                    WITNESSETH
                                    ----------
  
    WHEREAS, Crown Central Petroleum Corporation
  (the "Company") maintains the Crown Central
  Petroleum Retirement Plan, originally effective as
  of January 1, 1950 and as subsequently amended and
  restated (the "Plan").  The Company has the power
  to amend the Plan and now wishes to do so.
  
    NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:
  
    I.   Effective July 1, 1993, Section 5.8 is
  amended by addition of new subsection (h) to read
  as follows:
              "(h) The annual benefit payable to or
  in respect of a Participant which is otherwise
  limited by the dollar limitation described in this
  Section 5.8(a)(i)(x), shall be increased in
  accordance with cost-of-living adjustments of such
  limitation as prescribed by the Secretary of the
  Treasury or his delegate, including for such
  adjustments made after the commencement of the
  Participant's Pension."
  
    II.  Section 6.1(d)(i) is amended to read in
  its entirety as follows:
  
    "(i)  Effective January 1, 1998, except as
  provided in subsection (d)(ii), if the present
  value of a Pension payable under the Plan,
  including Pensions payable to Beneficiaries, is
  $5,000 or less on the commencement date of the
  Participant's or Beneficiary's benefit, the
  Actuarial Equivalent present value shall be paid
  in a single-sum payment.  However, in the case of
  distributions to Participants and Spouses, if the
  present value of a benefit has ever exceeded
  $5,000, the Participant and his  Spouse, if any,
  must consent in writing to the distribution before
  it may be made.  Payment shall be made as soon as
  practicable following the Participant's last day
  of service or as soon as practicable after an
  election is made by a Beneficiary."
  
  III.   Section 1.8(a) is amended by striking
     "and" at the end of  paragraph (5) and by
     striking the period and inserting the
     following in lieu thereof:
  
  ", and
  
    (7)  individual recognition awards under an
  established program, paid in cash or property."
  
    IV.  In all respects not amended, the Plan is
  hereby ratified and confirmed.
                              *   *   *   *   *   *
  
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this
  Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized
  officer and its corporate seal duly attested as of
  the day and year first above written.
  
         ATTEST:          CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM
                            CORPORATION
  
  
  
  /s/ - - Dolores B. Rawlings                 By /s/ - -
  Henry A. Rosenberg, Jr.
  ----------------------------      ------------------------
  ----------
        Secretary                      Chairman of the
  Board
#### National Manufacturing Corporation, Plaintiff, *v.*Buffalo Metal Container Corporation, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Erie County,

May 26, 1953.

*Magavern, Magavern, Lowe $ Gorman*for defendant.

*Penney, Penney $ Buerger*for plaintiff.

Hagerty, J.

Service of the summons herein on the Secretary of State as designated agent for such purpose constituted proper *personal*service on the defendant corporation, under the provisions of section 228 of the Civil Practice Act. The defendant has submitted no decision or statute which directly or impliedly would justify a holding that the service was null or void merely because the Secretary of State erred in mailing the copy of the summons to an incorrect address, resulting in the defendant corporation’s failure to receive the same.

*270Inasmuch as it appears conclusively, however, that the Secretary of State did not mail the summons to the defendant at the proper address, the court would be justified in vacating the judgment had the defendant submitted on this motion a copy of a proposed answer and an affidavit of a meritorious defense. Whether this form of service be considered *“*personal ” as set forth in the statute, or *“*constructive ”, as it actually is, the requirement of a copy of a proposed answer and an affidavit of a meritorious defense should be fulfilled by the movant. *(Carpenter*v. *Weatherwax,*277 App. Div. 264.)

The motion to set aside the service of the summons and complaint and to dismiss the action is denied.

The motion to vacate and set aside the judgment is denied, with leave to renew upon proper motion papers, including a proper and adequate affidavit of meritorious defense and a proposed answer, to be served on the attorneys for the plaintiff within three days after service upon the attorneys for the defendants of a copy of this order and notice of entry thereof, and in such an event the stay herein is continued until the hearing and determination of such renewed motion.

Submit order.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 128683 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### DEBORAH S. VanZANDT, Petitioner-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 128683 COA: 251666 Ingham CC: 02-000948-AA STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 31, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
# C_2013224EN.01000101.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6934 — Norges Bank/Generali/Group of buildings in Paris)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 224/01

On 29 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6934. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6934. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2013266EN.01000401.xml

| 17.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/4

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2013/C 266/04

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Monaco

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Monaco

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Monaco

Subject of commemoration: the 20th anniversary of the ONU joining

Description of the design: The coin depicts a dove with an olive branch, with in the middle of the arc, on the left side the cornucopia, and on the right side the punch, as the workshop Paris Mint mark. At the top, in semi-circle, the indication of the issuing country ‘MONACO’ and at the bottom, in semi-circle, the inscription ‘1993 ADMISSION À L'ONU 2013’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued:

Date of issue: July 2013

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

366 CAF 12-01784 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER G. SALO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATRICIA A. SALO, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PAUL M. DEEP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Joan E. Shkane, J.), entered July 30, 2012 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petitions for lack of jurisdiction.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner filed two petitions alleging violations of a prior custody order, and a modification petition based on a change in circumstances. Petitioner appeals from an order in which Family Court dismissed the petitions for lack of jurisdiction because a divorce action was pending in Supreme Court. We dismiss the appeal as moot because, while the appeal was pending, the parties and the Attorney for the Child entered into a stipulation modifying their custody and visitation arrangement “in full satisfaction of all petitions.” Upon consent of the parties, the court awarded petitioner primary physical custody, with visitation to respondent, and ordered that “all prior orders are hereby vacated.” Thus, “because the stipulation resulted in a new order that super[s]eded the order being appealed, this appeal is moot” ( Matter of Mace v Miller , 93 AD3d 1086, 1086; see Matter of Justeen T. , 17 AD3d 1148, 1148).

Entered: March 28, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court