alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                       (in millions except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three months ended           Twelve Months ended
                                               December 31,                 December 31,
                                            1997          1996           1997           1996
<S>                                      <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>
Line
 1  Net income available to common       $ 31,991      $ 33,309       $270,652       $264,204
       shareholders

 2  Weighted average number of shares
      outstanding during period           128,374       128,319        128,436        122,468

 3 Net shares issuable upon exercise of
     dilutive outstanding stock options       270           505            513            357

 4  Weighted average convertible
      preferred stock*                     11,325        11,314         11,325          9,583

 5  Preference dividends                   $5,859        $5,926        $23,435        $19,789

 6  Basic earnings per common share        $ 0.25        $ 0.26        $  2.11        $  2.16

 7  Diluted earnings per common
                 share                     $ 0.25        $ 0.26        $  2.10        $  2.14
<FN>
* Preferred  shares are convertible  into common stock (at the discretion of the
holder) at a rate of .911.  For 1996 this assumed  conversion  was averaged from
the issuance date of February 26, 1996.
</FN>
</TABLE>
China Health Industries Holdings, Inc.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Supplementary Agreement 

Party A: Xiuzheng Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd 

Party B: Harbin Humankind Biology Technology Co., Limited 

Party C: Xin Sun 

Party D: Harbin Huimeijia Medicine Company 

On December 24, 2014, Party A, Party B, Party C, and Party D
(the “Four Parties”) entered into a stock transfer agreement (the “Stock
Transfer Agreement”) and on February 9, 2015, the Four Parties entered into a
supplementary agreement (the “2015 Supplementary Agreement”). In order to
accelerate the transfer of core assets, the Four Parties entered into the
following terms after friendly negotiation. 

I. The Four Parties agreed to rescind the 2015 Supplementary
Agreement signed on February 9, 2015. 

II. The Four Parties agreed to execute the transfer based on
the Stock Transfer Agreement signed on December 24, 2014. 

III. This Agreement is executed in four copies. Each party
holds one copy. This Agreement is taken into effect after the undersigned sign
or seal on the Agreement. 

1




Party A: Xiuzheng Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd (seal) 
/s/
Jianzhong Wang (corporate seal affixed) 
Date: October 12, 2016 

Party B: Harbin Humankind Biology Technology Co., Limited
(seal) 
(corporate seal affixed) 
Date: October 12, 2016 

Party C: Xin Sun 

/s/ Xin Sun 
Date: October 12, 2016 

Party D: Harbin Huimeijia Medicine Company (seal)

(corporate seal affixed) 
Date: October 12, 2016 

2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30347

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FRANKLIN B. ROBINSON,

 

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-1448)

_________________________________________________________________

January 6, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Franklin B. Robinson, federal prisoner #08390-035, appeals

from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set

aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

Franklin argues that 1) the evidence was insufficient to support

his conspiracy conviction; 2) his grand and petit juries were not

selected from a fair cross-section of the community; 
2

3) the district court erred in admitting the out-of-court

statements of his coconspirator; 4) the district court violated

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 at sentencing; 5) the district court failed

to give a jury instruction on Robinson’s defense;

6) prosecutorial misconduct occurred during the grand jury

proceedings and at trial; and 7) Robinson received ineffective

assistance of counsel at trial and on appeal.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons

adopted by the district court. See United States v. Robinson,

No. 95-CV-1448 (W.D. La. Mar. 26, 1996). If this court were to

hold that a certificate of appealability (COA) is required in a

case such as this, COA would be denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

AFFIRMED.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


South Africa
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION 

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF 

DONALD SAUNDERS LITMAN TO 

THE MARYLAND BAR 

• IN THE 

• COURT OF APPEALS 

• OF MARYLAND 

• Misc. Docket AG 

• No. 84 

• September Term, 2015 

ORDER 

The Court having considered the Petition for Reinstatement filed by Donald 

Saunders Litman, Bar Counsel's response thereto, and upon good cause shown, it is this 

19th day of May, 2016 

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland a majority of the Court, that the 

petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and that Donald Saunders Litman is hereby 

reinstated to the practice of law in Maryland, and it is further 

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall replace the name of Donald 

Saunders Litman on the register of the attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the 

Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and to the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this 

State. 

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera 

Chief Judge
#### Roy Albert MIKUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 30, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; John G. Ferris, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7948

RONNIE VAUGHAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-628-AM) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 4, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Vaughan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ronnie Vaughan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vaughan has not made the requisite showing. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 24,2005 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| * November 30, 2005* |   | By:                       |  *s/Robert  P. Story, Jr.* |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   Date                    |   | Robert P. Story, Jr. |
|                           |   | Senior Vice President and |
|                           |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

 

Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Gregory K. Roeper

Gregory K. RoeperChief Executive OfficerAugust 1, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE EARNINGS STATEMENT AND THE BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                        99
<INVENTORY>                                      1,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,337
<PP&E>                                           6,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,750
<BONDS>                                            340<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        278
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,267
<SALES>                                          4,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,010
<CGS>                                            1,493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   838<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    815
<INCOME-TAX>                                       261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                554
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       554
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
<FN>
<F1>DOES NOT INCLUDE GUARANTEE OF ESOP DEBT OF 218.
<F2>ONLY INCLUDES R&D EXPENSE
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Date 4/8/11 Page of



### POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Summary Page

Updated based on Post-Focus Draft Revision1, 4/5/2011, Test Data Review Engineering Report.

Chemical ID: P-11-0107 Reviewer: Kwon

Endpoints-Assessed Table

Endpoints/Assessment Cycles 1 Releases Assessed in NCEM2? Reasons for not assessing releases

No XB Testing Required No Hazard Concern No Releases Release Below Acute Threshold 5 Release Below Chronic Threshold 5 Other

Ingestion Surface water Ground water (landfill) Consumer Use: DtD 2 Inhalation Air: incineration (stack) Air: fugitive Consumer Use: CEM 3 Dermal Consumer Use: CEM Eco Surface water: ADR conc and/or PDM 4
Consumer Use: DtD

1 Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model.
2 Down-the-Drain
3 Consumer Exposure Model
4 Probabilistic Dilution Model
5 The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch = s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      16,468,651
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           110,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                428,531,090
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     966,045,722
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       978,190,198
<LOANS>                                     81,254,015
<ALLOWANCE>                                    100,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,659,527,697
<DEPOSITS>                               1,098,638,133
<SHORT-TERM>                               440,670,429
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         12,520,537
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       24,182,333
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,103
<OTHER-SE>                                  83,449,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,659,527,697
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                701,230
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           22,154,769
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            22,855,999
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,281,938
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,332,317
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,523,682
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             286,574
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             23,807,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,639,045
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   6,639,045
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,951,073
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.79
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               100,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              100,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           100,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
260 La. 1132

#### Mary Lou Mire JOHNSON v. McGEHEE BROS. FURNITURE COMPANY et al.

No. 52213.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Mary Lou Mire Johnson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Iberville. 256 So.2d 741.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
# C_2011268EN.01000602.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6167 — RWA/OMV Wärme)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 268/03

On 30 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6167. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6167. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
-77.8 -77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6 -76.4 -76.2

 38.4

 38.6

 38.8

 39.0

 39.2

 39.4

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

★

●

● ● ●
# C_2013248EN.01000101.xml

| 29.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6945 — ABB/Power-One)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 248/01

On 22 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6945. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6945. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---