alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census for American Samoa

Reflects January 2012 data revision.

For more information visit www.census.gov.

Ta'u

Fitiuta

Ofu

Faleasao

Olosega

Swains Island

SWAINS ISLAND

MANU'A DISTRICT

ROSE ISLAND

Rose Island

AMERICAN SAMOA - 2010 Census Results

Total Population by County

EASTERN AND WESTERN DISTRICTS

20,858

10,299

350 to 5,499

0 to 349

Number of People

Total American Samoa Population: 55,519

EASTERN DISTRICT District or Island (County Equivalent)

Ofu County (County Subdivision Equivalent)

WESTERN

DISTRICT

EASTERN

DISTRICT

Vaifanua (pt.)

Sua

Tualauta

Ituau

Lealataua

Leasina

Ma'oputasi

Tualatai

Sa'ole

Vaifanua (pt.)

0 1 mi

0 2 mi

0 2 mi

0 2 mi
256 La. 889

#### Dave L. PEARCE, Commissioner of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture, ex rel. LOUISIANA LIVESTOCK SANITARY BOARD v. Jessie JOHNSON.

No. 50893.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1970.

In re: Dave L. Pearce, Commissioner of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture. applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline. 238 So.2d 271.

Not considered. The application was filed too late. See Art. 7, Sect. 11, La. Const.
1

The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of North Dakota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-2336

___________

Anthony James Moore, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of North Dakota.

Timothy Schuetzle, in his individual *

and official capacities, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: July 31, 2008

Filed: August 25, 2008

___________

Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

North Dakota inmate Anthony James Moore appeals the district court’s1

 adverse

grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having conducted de

novo review of the record, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.

2006), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

However, as to Moore’s claim alleging a lack of exercise in administrative

segregation, we amend the dismissal to be without prejudice, as the record shows he
-2-

did not administratively exhaust this claim before filing the instant lawsuit. See

Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2003) (inmate must exhaust before

filing suit, or dismissal is mandatory).

______________________________
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6461

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:02-cr-00025-JCC-1)

Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for return of property, pursuant to Fed. R. 

Crim. P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse 

of discretion. United States v. Chambers, 192 F.3d 374, 376 (3d 

Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. See United States v. Mitchell, No. 1:02-cr00025-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 311 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 311

 To provide reduced rates for nonprofit senior citizens organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Quillen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide reduced rates for nonprofit senior citizens organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) section 3626 
of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following new subsection:
    ``(m)(1) In the administration of this section, the rates for 
third-class mail matter mailed by a qualified nonprofit organization of 
senior citizens shall be the rates currently in effect under former 
section 4452 of this title for third-class mail matter mailed by a 
qualified nonprofit organization.
    ``(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term `qualified 
nonprofit organization of senior citizens' means any nonprofit 
organization whose membership is composed of senior citizens and whose 
primary purpose is the advancement of activities and programs of 
benefit to senior citizens.''.
    (b) Section 2401(c) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``and 3626(a)-(h) and (j) to (k)'' and inserting ``and 
subsections (a)-(h), (j) to (k), and (m) of section 3626''.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Stefan A. Bird, President of Salton Sea Funding Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 
 Date: August 3, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Stefan A. Bird
 Stefan A. Bird
 President
 (chief executive officer)
# C_2013252EN.01000101.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/1

---

2013/C 252/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 245, 24.8.2013

OJ C 245, 24.8.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 233, 10.8.2013

OJ C 226, 3.8.2013

OJ C 215, 27.7.2013

OJ C 207, 20.7.2013

OJ C 189, 29.6.2013

OJ C 178, 22.6.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
260 La. 134

#### Frank H. PENDER v. NATIONAL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 51929.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1971.

In re: National Fire and Marine Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches. 255 So.2d 95.

Writ refused. No error of law.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, L. Michael Cutrer, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of North American Scientific, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: June 10, 2004

 
| /s/ L. Michael Cutrer                 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| L. Michael Cutrer                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                             918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,269
<INVENTORY>                                    154,846
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               291,495
<PP&E>                                         129,991
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 484,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,336
<OTHER-SE>                                     234,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   484,138
<SALES>                                        665,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               665,513
<CGS>                                          473,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  593,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (166)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   707
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,364
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,091
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,598
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 310 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 310

    To direct the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain real 
   property adjacent to the Andrew Johnson National Historic Site in 
  Greeneville, Tennessee, for inclusion within the national cemetery 
                         located in that site.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Quillen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain real 
   property adjacent to the Andrew Johnson National Historic Site in 
  Greeneville, Tennessee, for inclusion within the national cemetery 
                         located in that site.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACQUISITION AND ADMINISTRATION OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO 
              ANDREW JOHNSON NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall acquire by donation the real 
property described in section 2 for inclusion within the national 
cemetery located in the Andrew Johnson National Historic Site in 
Greeneville, Tennessee. Upon acquisition, such property shall be added 
to, and administered as part of, the Andrew Johnson National Historic 
Site.

SEC. 2. PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED.

    The property to be acquired by the Secretary consists of 1.2 acres 
situated in the 10th Civil District of Greene County, Tennessee, and 
being Lots Nos. 83, 84, 85, 86 and 87 of the Sunnyside Addition, as 
shown by plat of record in Plat Book No. 4, page 59, Register's Office 
for Greene County, Tennessee.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Henry G. NEYREY, Jr., et al.

No. 4413.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 2, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1970.

Order Recalling Refusal of Rehearing Dec. 9, 1970.

Writ Refused Dec. 14, 1970.

D. Ross Banister, Chester E. Martin, Jesse S. Moore, Jr., Johnie E. Branch, Jr., Baton Rouge, Jesse S. Guillot, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Soloman S. Goldman, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

Before REDMANN, TAYLOR and BARNETTE, JJ.

TAYLOR, Judge.

This is a suit for expropriation by the State, through the Department of Highways, in order to obtain the land necessary for the construction of an overpass on Cleary Avenue to carry vehicular traffic across Interstate Highway 10. The value of the land actually expropriated was agreed upon by the parties. The sole issue determined by the trial court was whether severance damages should be allowed.

After trial on the merits, the lower court rendered judgment in favor of defendants in the sum of $74,191.67 in addition to the amount already on deposit in the registry of the court together with interest. The State has appealed devolutively to this court.

*587The judgment of the lower court that exceeded the amount deposited by the Department was not an excess for the land taken but was for severance damages suffered by remaining lands. Mover contends that because of this fact the Department not having deposited this amount, the appeal should be dismissed.

We conclude that mover’s contention is without merit on the authority of the Supreme Court in State, Department of Highways v. Holmes, 251 La. 607, 205 So.2d 416 (1967) which held that the making of the deposit was not essential to the validity of the appeal.

Motion to dismiss denied.

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

On December 7, 1970 we refused an application for a rehearing of our November 2, 1970 denial of a motion to dismiss this appeal. We were incorrect in taking that action. Under Rule XI, Section 6 of the Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal the application should not have been considered because the judgment denying the motion to dismiss did not finally dispose of the appeal.

Accordingly, our refusal of the application for a rehearing is now recalled and the application is not considered.

Application not considered.
#### Sherry Lynn GREENBERG, formerly known as Sherry Lynn Estok, Petitioner, v. Stephen M. ESTOK, Respondent.

No. 42443.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 27, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 212.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000   JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                     526,000       526,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,000         8,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0             0
<INVENTORY>                                308,000       308,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,000        46,000
<PP&E>                                      31,000        31,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             919,000       919,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      646,000       646,000
<BONDS>                                          0             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0             0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,000         1,000
<COMMON>                                   133,000       133,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 136,000       136,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               919,000       919,000
<SALES>                                    112,000       477,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           112,000       477,000
<CGS>                                       41,000        88,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           578,000     1,878,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (11,000)      (34,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (682,000)   (1,973,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0             0
<CHANGES>                                        0             0
<NET-INCOME>                              (682,000)   (1,973,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.026)        (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.026)        (0.75)


</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04006**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 04006\04006_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 04006\04006_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 04006\04006_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 04006\04006_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey J. ONeill, as Chief Executive Officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                           
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Dated: November 6, 2009 |  | By: /s/ Jeffrey J. ONeill
|                        |  | Jeffrey J. ONeill        
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
# C_2012258EN.01000101.xml

| 25.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/1

---

2012/C 258/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 250, 18.8.2012

OJ C 250, 18.8.2012

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 243, 11.8.2012

OJ C 235, 4.8.2012

OJ C 227, 28.7.2012

OJ C 217, 21.7.2012

OJ C 209, 14.7.2012

OJ C 200, 7.7.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2013325EN.01000101.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/1

---

2013/C 325/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 313, 26.10.2013

OJ C 313, 26.10.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 304, 19.10.2013

OJ C 298, 12.10.2013

OJ C 291, 5.10.2013

OJ C 284, 28.9.2013

OJ C 274, 21.9.2013

OJ C 260, 7.9.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---