alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.116**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office                        301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)301-457-1037 (TDD)e-mail: 2000usa@census.govStatistical Information StaffPopulation Division301-457-2422e-mail: pop@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12:01 A.M. EDT, MAY 23, 2001 (WEDNESDAY)

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Demographic Profile for Wisconsin

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the Profile of General Demographic Characteristics:Census 2000 for Wisconsin, a one-page table providing Census 2000 data on age and sexdistribution, race, Hispanic origin, household relationship and type, housing occupancy andtenure (whether the housing occupant owns or rents).

The profile includes nearly 100 data items in all, plus percentage distributions.

 In addition to the profile of the state as a whole, similar demographic profiles for counties,places and other geographic components of the state can be accessed on an embargoed basis at https://www.census.gov/dcmd/www/embargo/embargo_demoprofile.html. After the releasetime, go to the Census Bureau's online search-and-retrieval database American FactFinderhttp://factfinder2.census.gov or to its Demographic Profile Page https://www.census.gov/census2000/demoprofile.html. You will also be able to download the profiles from the bureau's file transfer protocol site http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/.

 For information about how to order paper copies of Census 2000 demographic profiles,contact Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, 301-457-4100; or e-mail:webmaster@census.gov. 

 For local context, contact the Wisconsin State Data Center, 608-266-1927; e-mail: bob.naylor@doa.state.wi.us.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### George BYRD and Jimmie Lee Byrd, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. T-338, T-288.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 22, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2012169EN.01001601.xml

| 15.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/16

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 June 2012

2012/C 169/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2551 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,51 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4312 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80920 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8373 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2008 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5070 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,540 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 297,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6968 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3150 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4578 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2890 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2626 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2885 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7379 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6143 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6102 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 464,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5901 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9411 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5508 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 844,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9990 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,460 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,0070 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,586 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5912 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6279 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,0530 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2551

JPY

Japanese yen

99,51

DKK

Danish krone

7,4312

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80920

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8373

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2008

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5070

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,540

HUF

Hungarian forint

297,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6968

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3150

RON

Romanian leu

4,4578

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2890

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2626

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2885

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7379

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6143

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6102

KRW

South Korean won

1 464,11

ZAR

South African rand

10,5901

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9411

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5508

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 844,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9990

PHP

Philippine peso

53,460

RUB

Russian rouble

41,0070

THB

Thai baht

39,586

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5912

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6279

INR

Indian rupee

70,0530

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Cone Mills Corporation's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-31977; 33-31979; 33-51951;
33-51953; 33-53705, 33-67800, 333-37054, and 333-60954) of our reports; dated
February 8, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cone Mills Corporation
for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2001.




/s/McGladrey & Pullen LLP


Greensboro, North Carolina
March 27, 2002
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2023 ND 167

Sergio Ruiz Ledezma, Petitioner and Appellant

v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20230055

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Dann E

. Greenwood , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND , for petitioner and appellant.

Amanda R. Engelstad, State’s Attorney, Dickinson, ND , for respondent and appellee ; submitted on brief.1 Ruiz Ledezma v. State No. 20230055

Per Curiam.
[¶1] Sergio Ruiz Ledezma appeals from a district court order denying his application for post

- conviction relief.
[¶2] On appeal, Ruiz Ledezma argue s the district court abused its discretion in denying his oral motion s for continuance made at the post

- conviction relief hearing. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ruiz Ledezma’s motion s for continuance . We summarily aff irm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4)

. [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3049 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3049

    To extend the current interim exemption under the Marine Mammal 
      Protection Act for commercial fisheries until April 1, 1994.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 1993

     Mr. Studds (for himself, Mr. Young of Alaska, and Mr. Saxton) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the current interim exemption under the Marine Mammal 
      Protection Act for commercial fisheries until April 1, 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 114(a)(1) 
of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1383a(a)(1)), is 
amended by striking ``October 1, 1993,'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``April 1, 1994,''.

                                 <all>
```
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Voting
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.08 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, FEB. 15, 2012 Graphs on Historical Voting Trends The Census Bureau has released 10 graphics that highlight national trends in voting by race, age, education, and other characteristics since 1964. Four graphics address presidential elections, four address congressional elections and two address all national elections. All are based on previously released tabulations from the November Voting and Registration Supplement of the Current Population Survey. The visualizations are available at <https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/socdemo/voting/publications/historical/index.html>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### DIAMOND HYDRAULIC REPAIR & RENTAL, INC. v. PIONEER FISHING AND RENTAL TOOLS, INC.

No. 53531.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: Diamond Hydraulic Repair & Rental, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson.

Writ denied. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Harvey KNOX.

No. 59902.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

William J. Doran, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., John W. Sinquefield, Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-ap-pellee. '

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DIXON, J.,

dissents, on the question of the excessive sentence.

CALOGERO, J.,

dissents, being of the view that there is merit in defendant’s assignments, 3, 5 & 6.
#### James HELVESTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 20, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2857

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the credit provided

by section 936 of such Code.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1993

Mr. COOPER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the credit provided by section 936 of such Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 936 of the Internal Revenue Code of

4 1986 (relating to Puerto Rico and possession tax credit)

5 is hereby repealed.

6 (b) The table of sections for subpart D of part III

7 of subchapter N of chapter 1 of such Code is amended

8 by striking the item relating to section 936.

9 (c) The amendments made by this section shall apply

10 to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1993.
2

•HR 2857 IH

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2051 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2051

   To provide States with greater flexibility in innovative highway 
                               financing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2014

 Mr. Kirk (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide States with greater flexibility in innovative highway 
                               financing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Highway Innovative Financing Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. INNOVATIVE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION FINANCING METHODS.

    (a) Value Pricing Pilot Program.--Section 1012(b)(1) of the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 149 
note; Public Law 102-240) is amended in the second sentence by striking 
``as many as 15 such State or local governments or public authorities'' 
and inserting ``States, local governments, and public authorities''.
    (b) Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot 
Program.--Section 1216(b)(2) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 
21st Century (23 U.S.C. 129 note; Public Law 105-178) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``3'' and inserting 
        ``10''; and
            (2) by striking the second sentence.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO GARCIA-ROMERO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-73149

Agency No. A088-666-090

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Garcia-Romero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. 

FILED

NOV 26 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We lack jurisdiction over the petition for review under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) because Garcia-Romero is challenging the agency’s

discretionary denial of cancellation of removal, see Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,

552 F.3d 975, 978 (9th Cir. 2009), and he has not set forth a colorable

constitutional claim or question of law over which we could otherwise exercise

jurisdiction, see id. (any challenge of an IJ’s discretionary determination must

present a colorable constitutional claim or question of law in order for this court to

exercise jurisdiction).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

2 12-73149
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00381

- CV

G REGORY W

AYNE C OON

, Appellant

V

.

V ICTORIA J ACOBS C OON (T HOMAS )

, Appellee §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 233rd Distri c t Court

of Tarrant County ( 233

- 694810

- 21 )

October 13, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dis m issed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
Order entered August 18, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00335-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.N.O., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-02229

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated June 29, 

2020, we informed appellant the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s record 

had not been filed because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid 

for or made arrangements to pay for the record. We directed appellant to provide 

the Court with written verification showing the reporter’s record had been

requested and that appellant had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the 

record or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We 

cautioned appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within ten 

days might result in the appeal being ordered submitted without the reporter’s 
record. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation nor 

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s record. 

Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. 

Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
No. 00-7218.

#### Thomas *v.*Cleburne County Commission et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Pasquale Cipriani, Assignor, to Michael Ricciardelli, Assignee.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

July 11, 1951.

*Benjamin H. Wides el*for assignee.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

The proposed ex parte order for the discharge of the assignee cannot be signed. Before me are the meagre allegations that the deponent, who is the assignee, “ has disbursed all of the funds in his hands as such assignee ” *‘'*pursuant to the orders of this Court' ’, and that the assignee *“*has no funds whatsoever in his hands to the credit of this estate ’ \ Cancelled vouchers are submitted, as is the last bank statement showing that the account is closed.

It should not have been necessary for the court to search in the voluminous files of the office of the County Clerk for the “ orders ” referred to and for the other papers in the proceeding. This the court nevertheless did, so as not to require the present presentation of copies of the filed papers necessary for an adequate disposition of this application.

*556But even so, the supporting affidavit now before me does not in any way fill the gap. If the assignee were persuaded to follow established procedure with appropriate — and, I feel sure, satisfying — professional artistry, he should be pleased to recite in his affidavit a short statement of the history and status of the proceeding, so that the court which is asked to discharge the assignee from the obligations of his fiduciary responsibilities and trust may be adequately informed of what has been done.

In any event, if required procedure is to be followed, the assignee should inform the court that he has filed a final report and account, which have been duly approved and allowed, and the assignee should present under oath a specific statement of the names of the creditors and others to whom payments were made by him, and the dates and amounts of such payments. The assignee should allege that he has made all the distributions directed by the court (rather than stating merely that payments made were “ pursuant ” to order), and that all the persons involved have received the respective sums to which they are entitled — particularly where, among the payments, there has been a percentage distribution to general creditors. Then the submission of the loose cancelled vouchers and the bank’s intermediate and closing statements has some value.

The present proposed order is rejected, without prejudice to the presentation of an order of discharge based upon adequate allegations of what is jurisdictionally required.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share


     A summary of the  reconciliation  from basic  earnings  (loss) per share to
diluted  earnings  (loss) per share for the three month  periods ended March 31,
1998 and 1997 follows:





                                                              March 31
                                                         1998          1997
                                                         ----          ----

Net earnings (loss)                                    1,666,592   (6,902,335)
Preferred stock dividends                                 77,875           --
                                                       ---------   -----------
Net income available to common stock holders           1,588,717   (6,902,335)
                                                       =========   ===========

Basic EPS-weighted average shares outstanding         10,380,260     7,853,134
                                                      ==========     =========
Basic earnings (loss) per share                           $ 0.15       $ (0.87)
                                                          ======       ========
Basic EPS-weighted average shares outstanding         10,380,260            --
Effect of diluted securities:
     Options and warrants                                276,860            --
     Convertible preferred stock                         569,638            --
                                                         -------
Dilutive EPS-weighted average shares outstanding      11,226,758            --
                                                      ==========
Diluted Earnings (loss) per share                         $ 0.14            --
                                                          ======

Convertible debt not included in diluted EPS since
antidilutive                                           1,801,749            --
                                                       =========
# C_2012162EN.01000201.xml

| 8.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6446 — Pratt & Whitney/International Aero Engines)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 162/03

On 4 June 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6446. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6446. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---