alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013272EN.01000601.xml

| 20.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/6

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2013/C 272/05

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Hellenic Republic

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Hellenic Republic

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: The Hellenic Republic

Subject of commemoration: 2 400th Anniversary of the founding of Plato’s Academy

Description of the design: Portrait of Plato (in profile). On the left: the words ‘2 400 years since the founding of Plato’s Academy’ and ‘Hellenic Republic’ in ancient Greek lettering. On the right: ‘2013’ and the monogram of the Greek Mint. In exergue, ‘ΣΤΑΜ’ (monogram of the author G. Stamatopoulos).

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: up to 750 000

Date of issue: Autumn 2013

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CENTRAL PARKING FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          46,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,784
<PP&E>                                         438,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,061,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,963
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          110,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           366
<OTHER-SE>                                     368,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,061,963
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               554,350
<CGS>                                          425,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  494,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,485
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,607
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (195)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,412
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION




I, Emanuel Eads, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Central Parking
Corporation;

 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2005              By:   /s/ EMANUEL EADS
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Emanuel Eads
                                       Chief Executive Officer
#### Roberto MORALES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 70-777, 70-940.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 11, 1971.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Lewis S. Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of breaking and entering an automobile with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: grand larceny, and of grand larceny. We sustain the appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the property in question was of value in excess of $100. See Todd v. State, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 908. The judgment and sentence are reversed and set aside, and the cause is remanded with direction to enter judgment for the lesser offenses of breaking and entering an automobile with intent to commit a misdemeanor, and of petit larceny, and for re-sentence thereon.

On the separate appeal challenging the order revoking the probation granted for a prior offense, we affirm.

It is so ordered.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020

NO. 03

- 18

- 00703

- CR

Veronica Ann Arroyo, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTI CE R OSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

t he record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION


I, Jeff Heavrin, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Central Parking
Corporation;

 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2005                By:    /s/ JEFF HEAVRIN
                                           ------------------------
                                           Jeff Heavrin
                                           Senior Vice President and Chief
                                           Financial Officer
# C_2013293EN.01000701.xml

| 9.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 October 2013

2013/C 293/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3576 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4599 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84265 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7023 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2284 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0820 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,518 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,22 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7026 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1931 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4357 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6939 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4316 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3994 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5271 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6303 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6944 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 458,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4645 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3133 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 153,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3274 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,558 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,7462 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,565 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9847 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7394 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,8930 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3576

JPY

Japanese yen

131,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4599

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84265

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7023

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2284

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0820

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,518

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,22

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7026

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1931

RON

Romanian leu

4,4357

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6939

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4316

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3994

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5271

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6303

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6944

KRW

South Korean won

1 458,12

ZAR

South African rand

13,4645

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3133

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 153,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3274

PHP

Philippine peso

58,558

RUB

Russian rouble

43,7462

THB

Thai baht

42,565

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9847

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7394

INR

Indian rupee

83,8930

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2013203EN.01000301.xml

| 17.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/3

---

Special Report No 3/2013 ‘Have the Marco Polo programmes been effective in shifting traffic off the road?’

2013/C 203/03

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 3/2013 ‘Have the Marco Polo programmes been effective in shifting traffic off the road?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
No. 11538.

#### Der Schwaben Verein *v.*Bendure.

Decided February 15, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Jefferson county.

*Mr. J. C. Bigger*and *Mr. Fred M. Coleman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. McClave & McClave,*for defend-^ant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. *568J., Crew, Spear, Davis,_ Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10495]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition--Determinations: Exhibition of Two Renaissance-Era 
Italian Paintings

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that two objects to be exhibited in the Italian 
Renaissance Paintings Gallery of The J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty 
Center, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United 
States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant 
to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The 
J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Center, Los Angeles, California, from 
on or about December 17, 2018, until on or about August 5, 2019, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bdced8dec9d4d2d38f898884fdcec9dcc9d893dad2cb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c2f393f283533326e6869651c2f283d2839723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-11 of July 27, 2018.

Jennifer Z. Galt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-17148 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Everett GRAVES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 7411.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 23, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.
#### LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION v. MANTOR.

No. 39261.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20277

HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; 

DII INDUSTRIES LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

NL INDUSTRIES INC., Formerly Known as National Lead Co.; 

TREMONT LLC; 

TRE HOLDING CORP., Formerly Known as Bentonite Corp.; 

TRE MANAGEMENT CO., Formerly Known as Baroid Management Co.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:05-CV-4160

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 7, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-20277

2

The plaintiffs appeal a judgment confirming an arbitration award. We

have reviewed the briefs and applicable law and pertinent portions of the record

and have heard the arguments of counsel. 

The district court, in a thorough and convincing opinion, correctly held

thatthe plaintiffs have failed to satisfy the steep burden required to overturn an

arbitration award. One of the issues presented is whether the “manifest disregard” standard for reviewing arbitration awards survives Hall Street Assocs.,

L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008). We need not decide

that question, because the plaintiffs have not met the “manifest disregard” test

even if it is still applicable.

The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

On the day before oral argument, the plaintiffs filed a motion to stay the

appeal, or in the alternative to stay issuance of an opinion, and for limited remand to allow the district court to consider a motion filed contemporaneously in

that court for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) based on a claim

of newly-discovered evidence. We DENY the motion filed in this court but express no view on the merits of the motion pending in the district court. 

By issuing the mandate, we cede jurisdiction. The district court now has

whatever jurisdiction it would have had, absent an appeal,to consider post-judgment motions. See Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976) (per

curiam); see also Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Perambangan Minyak Dan

Gas Bumi Negara, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 27765, at *13-*19 (5th Cir. Mar. 5,

2003) (per curiam) (unpublished).
No. 00-7247.

#### Paul *v.*Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael C. Wheeler, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 446]

Judgment *950unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, *People v Flores,*84 NY2d 184, 189). County Court’s *Sandoval*compromise reflects a proper exercise of the court’s discretion (see, *People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459; *People v Davis,*168 AD2d 218, *lv denied*77 NY2d 876). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), is legally sufficient to support the conviction. Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641, 642), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Furfure, J. — Aggravated Unlicensed Operation Motor Vehicle, 1st Degree.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.