alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                          21,042
<SECURITIES>                                     1,036
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,344
<INVENTORY>                                      7,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,203
<PP&E>                                          43,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,695
<BONDS>                                          1,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           197
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,608
<SALES>                                         64,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,354
<CGS>                                           39,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,860
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,973
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,887
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,887
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51


</TABLE>
# USVI

# Working
#### PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. Joan McCARSON, Appellee.

No. 73-216.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1973.

Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings and Carl K. Hoff-mann, Miami, for appellant.

Tobias Simon and Elizabeth duFresne, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

*629PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Adams v. Royal Exchange Assur., Fla.1952, 62 So.2d 591; Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Winn, 9th Cir. 1934, 71 F.2d 126; Old Republic Insurance Company v. Alexander, 245 Ark. 1029, 436 S.W.2d 829; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Kuhlenschmidt, 218 Ind. 404, 33 N.E.2d 340; Vol. 7, Couch on Insurance, 2nd Ed., § 37:306; Vol. 1, Jones on Evidence, 6th Ed., §§ 4:9, 4:10; Slough, Relevancy Unraveled, 6 Kansas Law Review 38.
#### Angel L. NIGAGLIONI, Appellant, v. CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-51.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 21, 1973.

*571Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for appellant.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner & Hardy, and John M. Parker, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant appeals an order dismissing his complaint with prejudice.

On May 18, 1971 the plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident with a hit-and-run driver. He notified his automobile liability insurance carrier, the defendant Century Insurance Company of New York, and thereby activated the uninsured motorist provision of the contract. In accordance therewith, the plaintiff appointed an arbitrator and the defendant appointed an arbitrator. However, the two arbitrators were unable to agree upon the selection of a third impartial arbitrator. Subsequently, plaintiff-appellant filed a complaint requesting a declaration of the appellant’s rights, the appointment of an impartial third arbitrator, and an award of attorney’s fees and costs. The defendant-appellee filed a motion to appoint an arbitrator and to dismiss the complaint, and subsequently the trial judge dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

Appellant contends that the trial court committed error in dismissing the complaint which sought to have a third impartial arbitrator appointed. We are in agreement.

Although the complaint in the case sub judice prayed for a declaration of rights and an award of attorney’s fees and costs in addition to the appointment of a third impartial arbitrator, we find that same was sufficient to meet the requirements of F.S. § 682.17 F.S.A., and should have been considered as a motion under said section. See Keith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Fla.App.1970, 240 So.2d 202.

In addition, we hold that the court below committed error in failing to consider the appellant’s application for costs and attorney’s fees.

Therefore, the order under review be and the same is hereby reversed with directions to grant the plaintiff a hearing on his complaint, considering it to be a motion filed pursuant to F.S. § 682.17 F.S.A., and to further consider whether the appellant’s action in bringing the matter of the failure of arbitrators to agree to the attention of the court was reasonably necessary under the circumstances in order to pursue his claim arising under his insurance policy. If the court finds that the action was reasonably necessary, it shall assess reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to F.S. § *572627.428 F.S.A. In any event, the court is to award costs to the plaintiff. See Whitfield v. Century Insurance Company of New York, Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 569 (opinion filed July 17, 1973).

Reversed and remanded with directions.
# C_2012374EN.01000101.xml

| 4.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6767 — Bain Capital Investors/Atento)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 374/01

On 28 November 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6767. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6767. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                        90
<INVENTORY>                                        953
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,455
<PP&E>                                           5,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,798
<BONDS>                                            401<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        280
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,385
<SALES>                                          1,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,586
<CGS>                                              486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   285<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    268
<INCOME-TAX>                                        94
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       174
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Does not include guarantee of ESOP dept of $218.
<F2>Only includes R&D expense.
<F3>Restated for 8/31/99 merger accounted for as a pooling of interests.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

October 2, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00875

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF S.O.W

.,

From the 386t h Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1994

- JUV

- 211 5 Honorable Laura Parker, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant , a juvenile certified to be tried as an adult, was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment on November 12, 1996

. Appellant appealed and this court affirmed the trial court’s judgment in an opinion issued on May 20, 1998

. See Williams v. State

, 974 S.W.2d 324 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1998, pet. ref’d), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 908 (1999). Appellant recently filed a new notice of appeal and motion to set aside the judgment seeking to challenge the juven ile court ’s transfer order signed on October 18, 1994 in which it waiv ed its jurisdiction and transferr ed appellant to the criminal district court for prosecution as an adult

. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 54.02 (West 2014 ) (establishing the procedures for wa iver of juvenile court jurisdiction and certification for trial as an adult)

.

P rior to January 1, 1996, an immediate appeal from a section 54.02 transfer order could be taken directly from the juvenile court to the court of appeals in the manner of civil cases

. See Moon v. State , 451 S.W.3d 28, 39 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (citing Acts 1973, 63d Leg., ch. 544, § 1 p. 1483, eff. Sept. 1, 1973, codified at T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. 56.01 (a)

— (c)). I n appellant’s
case, no immediate appeal was filed from the Oct ober 18, 1994 transfer order

, and no issues were raised challenging the t ransfer order in the direct appeal from appellant’s capital murder conviction.

Appellant ’s current notice of appeal was filed in this court on December 15, 2014 . Under the applicabl e rules, a notice of appeal from the juvenile court’s October 18, 1994 transfer order was due on November 17, 1994. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1 (requiring notice of appeal to be filed within thirty days after the order or judgment is signed). Here, appellan t’s notice of appeal was filed twenty years after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal expired. See id.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within thirty ( 3 0) days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a). If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appealwill be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). All deadlines in this matter are suspend ed pending resolution of the jurisdictional issue.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have he reunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of October, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
#### Frank T. BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida et al. Respondents.

No. 43730.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 8, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J, and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ, concur.
EXHIBIT 4.6

                       AMENDMENT TO 1989 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                           EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 13, 1996

                                   RESOLUTION

               WHEREAS,  on  December  22, 1995 the Board of  Directors  of U.S.
        Energy Corp.  ("USE" or the "Company")  adopted an amendment to the U.S.
        Energy Corp.  1989 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan")  whereby the number of
        shares  available  for issuance  under the Plan was increased to 925,000
        shares; and

               WHEREAS,  the Compensation  Committee  advised the Board, and the
        Board agreed that it was in the best  interest of the Company to request
        shareholder  ratification  of the Board's  decision to amend the Plan to
        increase the number of options  issuable to 925,000,  which would permit
        conversion of all outstanding non-qualified options to qualified options
        without  any other  change in the terms of such  options (as to exercise
        price, conditions of employment and terms of exercise); and

               WHEREAS,  ratification  of the December 22, 1995 Amendment to the
        Plan was submitted to  shareholders  for vote at the 1996 Annual Meeting
        of Shareholders on December 13, 1996; and

               WHEREAS,  the  shareholders of U.S. Energy Corp. by majority vote
        at the 1996 Annual  Meeting of  Shareholders  ratified  the December 22,
        1995  Amendment to the 1989 Stock Option Plan  increasing  the number of
        shares available for issuance to 925,000.

               NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of U.S.
        Energy does hereby convert all outstanding  non-qualified  stock options
        as of December  13,  1996,  granted  under the 1989 Stock Option Plan to
        qualified  options.  All other terms and  conditions of the Stock Option
        Agreements shall remain in full force and effect.




<PAGE>
# C_2014046EN.01000601.xml

| 18.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 February 2014

(2014/C 46/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3699 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,60 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4620 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81885 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8286 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2221 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,396 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1471 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4899 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9858 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5159 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5015 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6238 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6381 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7239 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 452,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8483 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3071 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6565 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 144,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5130 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,768 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,1519 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,161 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2752 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1145 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,7386 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3699

JPY

Japanese yen

139,60

DKK

Danish krone

7,4620

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81885

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8286

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2221

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,396

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1471

RON

Romanian leu

4,4899

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9858

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5159

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5015

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6238

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6381

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7239

KRW

South Korean won

1 452,81

ZAR

South African rand

14,8483

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3071

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6565

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 144,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5130

PHP

Philippine peso

60,768

RUB

Russian rouble

48,1519

THB

Thai baht

44,161

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2752

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1145

INR

Indian rupee

84,7386

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 6
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                          162,804
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                         176,213
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                   6,918
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,131
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                         65,024
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                       24,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                             89,444
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                        99,000
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                               91
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                               44
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                        2,232
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                        13,409
<NET-ASSETS>                                    93,687
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                               17,337
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                   7,958
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          9,379
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                        64,178
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                        2,560
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                           73,941
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                        9,379
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                        64,562
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                             47
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                          88,284
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                            615
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                            3,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,358
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                  7,958
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                            74,576
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                         1,260.55
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                 145.81
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                       1,037.55
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                            145.81
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                     1,003.74
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                           1,456,54
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.11


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WALTER BURKS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 4327

[ January 11, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502014CF005260A

.

Anthony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O'Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2013294EN.01000201.xml

| 10.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 October 2013

2013/C 294/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3515 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4595 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7445 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2313 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1100 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,598 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7027 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1995 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4658 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6857 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4299 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4029 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4801 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6269 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6918 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 453,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,5072 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2709 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6125 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 068,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3222 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,346 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,7300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,488 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9800 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8128 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,5980 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3515

JPY

Japanese yen

131,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4595

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84640

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7445

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2313

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1100

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,598

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7027

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1995

RON

Romanian leu

4,4658

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6857

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4299

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4029

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4801

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6269

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6918

KRW

South Korean won

1 453,88

ZAR

South African rand

13,5072

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2709

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6125

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 068,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3222

PHP

Philippine peso

58,346

RUB

Russian rouble

43,7300

THB

Thai baht

42,488

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9800

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8128

INR

Indian rupee

83,5980

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---