alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-2522

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. William A. Shaffer, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 6, 2001 Filed: November 13, 2001

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. William A. Shaffer appeals his conviction upon his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), for which the district court 1 sentenced him to 96 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. Counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing (1) the Second Amendment was violated; (2) there was a violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and-2- Castillo v. United States , 530 U.S. 120 (2000), “because whether the shotgun fit the definition of a weapon as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845 was an element of the offense which should have been charged in the indictment, and was not merely a sentencing factor”; (3) Mr. Shaffer was coerced into signing his post-arrest statement; (4) the district court lacked jurisdiction under Article III; and (5) the prosecution was, among other things, dishonest and orchestrated to incite fear. We reject these arguments seriatim. First, “it is now well-settled that Congress did not violate the Second Amendment in enacting [§ 922(g)(1)].” United States v. Waller , 218 F.3d 856, 857 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam). Second, Mr. Shaffer’s section 5845 argument is misplaced, given that he did not receive an enhanced sentence for possessing a sawed-off shotgun as opposed to a firearm in general. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(B)(i) (10-year mandatory minimum prison term if firearm possessed is “short-barreled shotgun”). Third, Mr. Shaffer waived his argument concerning the voluntariness of his signed statement. See United States v. Vong , 171 F.3d 648, 654 (8th Cir. 1999) (by pleading guilty defendant waived all non-jurisdictional defenses). Fourth, the district court had jurisdiction because section 922 is a law of the United States enacted by Congress, see U.S. Const. art. I, § 1, and federal courts have jurisdiction over cases arising from federal laws, see U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1. Finally, Mr. Shaffer’s improper-prosecution argument is wholly conclusory and waived by his guilty plea. See Vong , 171 F.3d at 652. Upon further review of the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.-3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Estimate of PM10 fugitive dust from coal trains (controlled verus uncontrolled)**

Adapted from page C-16 of the State submittal
Rail Coal Dust Emission Factor (kg dust/tonne of coal transported) = 0.1*(0.62*D)0.6*((365-P)/365)*(SD/D)*((100-CE)/100)*SF

Where: D = total rail distance from origin to destination (km) = 2414 P = number of precipitation days = 177 CE = coal dust control efficiency (i.e. surfactant efficiency) = 21.25 SF = scaling factor from TSP to PM10 = 0.5 SD = segment distance through the maintenance area (km) = 3.8 10.51 3.01

Base emission factor PrecipitationSegment distance level of

control Emission

factor 2011 coal

exports (tons) Kent controlled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0016 0.7875 0.0025664,854,451 Kent uncontrolled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0016 1 0.003258 4,854,451

Seattle controlled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0044 0.7875 0.0070964,854,451 Seattle uncontrolled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0044 1 0.009011 4,854,451

Tacoma controlled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0012 0.7875 0.002032 4,854,451 Tacoma uncontrolled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0012 1 0.002581 4,854,451
total change in fugitive dust emissions

Change in fugitive dust emissions (controlled
versus uncontrolled) Total PM10

inventory (tons) Change in

estimated fugitive dust as a percentage of total inventory Kent 3.704772093 140.4 2.64% Seattle 10.24661966 734.5 1.40% Tacoma 2.934569474 528.2 0.56% **Total 16.88596122**  **1403.1** 1.20%-P)/365)*(SD/D)*((100-CE)/100)*SF

(0 for 9 months, and then 85 for last 3 months of 2011 withadopted surfactant requirement)

Kent Seattle Tacoma fugitive dust (kg) fugitive

dust (tons) delta

(tons) 12455.16 13.72945 15816.08 17.43422 3.704772

34448.36 37.97277 43743.94 48.21939 10.24662

9865.799 10.87517 12528 13.80974 2.934569
total change in fugitive dust emissions 16.88596
# C_2012340EN.01000101.xml

| 8.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 November 2012

2012/C 340/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2746 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 102,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4594 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79840 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5547 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2065 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3195 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,395 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,10 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1131 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5163 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2713 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2228 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2662 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8788 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5403 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5586 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 384,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0253 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9770 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5375 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 251,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8917 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,183 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0973 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,117 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5911 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5991 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,1020 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2746

JPY

Japanese yen

102,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4594

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79840

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5547

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2065

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3195

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,395

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,10

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1131

RON

Romanian leu

4,5163

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2713

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2228

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2662

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8788

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5403

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5586

KRW

South Korean won

1 384,34

ZAR

South African rand

11,0253

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9770

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5375

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 251,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8917

PHP

Philippine peso

52,183

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0973

THB

Thai baht

39,117

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5911

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5991

INR

Indian rupee

69,1020

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### MORGAN WILLIAMS INSURANCE CO. v. PEPPER.

No. 39176.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
# C_2014260EN.01003301.xml

| 9.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/33

---

Closure of complaint CHAP (2010) 723

2014/C 260/16

The European Commission has received numerous complaints concerning the mobility of staff working in the public health service in Navarre (Spain). The persons concerned cannot be appointed to positions in the public health service of other Spanish regions on account of a difference in the staff regulations applicable to employees in the regions concerned.

It is clear from the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union that the Community rules concerning the freedom of movement for workers, and in particular Article 45 TFEU, do not apply to situations which bear no relationship to those governed by Community law or where all the elements of such situations are purely internal to the individual Member State (1).

1

The situation described in these complaints concerns mobility between the various public health services existing within the territory of Spain, and does not, in principle, have any cross-border implications. Consequently, the EU rules referred to above do not apply. The issues raised by the complainants need to be examined in the light of the Spanish legislation applicable before the administrative or judicial instances concerned.

---

(1)  Judgment of the Court of Justice of 16 December 1992 in Case C-206/91 Koua Poirrez.

1

---
[PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-13005

____________________

DONALD J. TRUMP, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 9:22-cv-81294-AMC

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-13005 Date Filed: 12/01/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Order of the Court 22-13005

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit 

Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Absent a stay or withholding of the mandate in the appeal to 

which this order is appended, the clerk is directed to issue the mandate after seven (7) days of the date of this opinion. Consistent with 

Eleventh Circuit Rule 41-2, the clerk is directed to provide the active members of this Court with notice of the issuance of this opinion and our direction to expedite issuance of the mandate.

SO ORDERED.

USCA11 Case: 22-13005 Date Filed: 12/01/2022 Page: 2 of 2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105·3901
 

OFFICE OF THE 

REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR 

fa It am 

The Honorable William Rhodes 

Gila River Indian Community 

P.O. Box 97 

Sacaton, AZ 85247 

Re:	 Eligibility Determination under 40 C.F.R. Part 49 for a Clean Air Act (CAA) Air Quality 

Management Plan 

Dear Governor Rhodes: 

I am pleased to inform you that, in response to the November 17,2006 application by the Gila 

River Indian Conununity (the Tribe), EPA has determined that the Tribe is eligible for treatment in the 

same manner as a state (TAS) for the following four CAA programs, which make up the Tribe's Air 

Quality Management Plan (AQMP): (i) a tribal implementation plan (TIP) under CAA § 110; (ii) the New 

Source Performance Standards (NSPS) under CAA § 111; (iii) the National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) under CAA § 112; and (iv) a title V permit program. In addition, 

we conclude that the Tribe is eligible for TAS for notification as an "affected state" under CAA § 

505(a)(2) and air quality designations under CAA § 107(d). 

To obtain TAS eligibility, a tribal applicant must demonstrate that it meets the criteria set forth in 

Section 301(d)(2) of the CAA, 42 U.S.c. § 7601(d)(2), and codified in the Tribal Authority Rule at 40 

C.F.R. § 49.6. After reviewing the Tribe's application and other relevant materials, EPA has determined 

that the Tribe meets these criteria. 

EPA evaluates a Tribe's eligibility for TAS under the CAA on a case-by-case basis. Thus, this 

eligibility determination applies only to CAA Sections 107(d), 110, 111, 112, 114, and title V (which 

includes Section 505). Our conclusion relates solely to the Tribe's eligibility for TAS and does not 

address the approvability under the CAA of any regulatory program in the Tribe's AQMP. EPA will 

determine whether to approve the various components ofthe Tribe's AQMP for a particular CAA 

program in separate notice and comment processes, where appropriate. As a general matter, future 

requests for eligibility under this or another statutory authority may require additional eligibility analyses. 

If you have any questions about this eligibility detennination, please contact Vali Frank ofthe 

Office of Regional Counsel at (415) 972-3916 or Maeve Foley of the Air Division at (415) 947-4105. For 

questions regarding EPA's process for acting on the Tribe's AQMP, please contact Jeanhee Hong of the 

Office of Regional Counsel at (415) 947-3570 or Wienke Tax of the Air Division at 415-947-4192. 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
I appreciate the Tribe's dedication to protecting the environment on the Reservation, 

demonstrated by the application for this extensive eligibility determination. EPA Region 9 looks forward 

to working with the Tribe to continue developing and strengthening effective tribal environmental 

programs. 

Sincerely, 

Laura Yoshii 

Acting Regional Administrator 

cc:	 Margaret Cook, GRIC DEQ 

Dan Blair, GRIC DEQ
Pinnacl e Airlines Corp . pAri-'ViPN' T O h 168 9 Nonconna h Blvd . .,^ . J , U l IIIMVJ I ] Memphis , T N 3813 2 '' r\ OPrHATlUN' : 901-348-410 0 PNCL.co m 

## PINNACL E '^^ ^ - ^ I I ^ ^ 3 M 8 AIRLINE S COR R

Marc h 11,20 1 Mr . Denni s DeVan y Chief , EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Divisio n Offic e of Aviatio n Analysi s Departmen t

of Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : EA S a

t Alpen aMichiga n Docke t OST-2009-030 0 Dea r Mr . DeVany : T o th e exten t

necessary , Pinnacl e Airlines , Inc . ("Pinnacle" ) an dMesab aAviation , Inc. , d/b/ aMesaba Airline s ("Mesaba" ) jointl y reques t tha t eithe r carrie r b e deeme deligibl e t o receiv e th e EA S compensatio n establishe dby Orde r 2010-5-18 . Pinnacl e an dMesab aar e no w bot h wholl y owne d subsidiarie s o f

th e holdin g corporation . Pinnacl e Airlines , Corp . Bot h carrier s currentl y operat e an dwil l continu e t o operat e a s "Delt aConnection " carriers . Flight s operate dby Mesab awoul dus e Saab 34 0 aircraft , an dflight s operate db y Pinnacl e woul dus e 5 0 seat CRJ20 0 Regiona l Je t

Aircraft . Mesab aan dPinnacl e seek t o provid e EA S servic e on a n interi m basi s pursuan t

t o th e rate s establishe db y Orde r 2010-5-18 , an dwithou t

prejudic e t o thei r

ability t o seek ne w EA S rate s for

CRJ20 0 servic e onc e th e longe r termfleet

plan s of th e respectiv e carrier s ar e established . Sincerely , 

### ''/ ) D . Phili p Ree d Vic e Presiden t Networ k Schedulin g an dOperation s Analytic s Pinnacl e Airline s Corp . cc : Maximillia n Shemesh , Genera l Counsel , MesabaAirline s Caro l A . Shaffo , Mayo r

Alpena , M I Bil l McRoberts , Airport

Manager , Alpen aCounty Regiona l Airport
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Saudi Arabia
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Robert W. HOLLOWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-166.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 11516.

#### Patterson et al., Partners, *v.*Harvey, Admr.

Decided February 8, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Pike county.

*Messrs. Eylar &*Douglas, for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Dougherty &*Moore, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10499 ]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “Nordic Impressions: Art from Åland, Denmark, the Faroe Islands, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, 1821-2017,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Phillips Collection, Washington, District of Columbia, from on or about October 13, 2018, until on or about January 13, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-11 of July 27, 2018.                

Jennifer Z. Galt,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-17330 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
# GE <> Education exp
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133681 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133681 COA: 265197 Wayne CC: 04-011031-01 VERNICE RAY ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
# C_2013034EN.01000102.xml

| 6.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6784 — SFR/Librairie Fernand Nathan)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 34/02

On 25 January 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6784. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6784. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---