alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

951 

CAF 13-00206 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF LISA A. GALLAGHER, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL T. GALLAGHER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

WELCH & ZINK, CORNING (JEFF N. EVANS OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

BETZJITOMIR & BAXTER, LLP, BATH (SUSAN BETZJITOMIR OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

CAROLYN KELLOGG JONAS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, WELLSVILLE.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Joseph

W. Latham, J.), entered April 26, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 4. The order, insofar as appealed from,

denied the amended petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is 

unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the amended petition is

reinstated, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Steuben

County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following

Memorandum: Petitioner mother commenced this proceeding seeking an

upward modification of respondent father’s child support obligation as

set forth in the parties’ separation agreement. We agree with the

mother that Family Court erred in concluding, following a hearing,

that she failed to establish a sufficient change in circumstances to

warrant modification of the father’s child support obligation.

The parties’ separation agreement, which was incorporated but not

merged into the judgment of divorce, provided, inter alia, that the

parties were opting out of the requirements of the Child Support

Standards Act based on several factors, including that the children

would spend a significant portion of time with the father pursuant to

the visitation schedule set forth in the separation agreement. In her

petition, the mother alleged that there had been a breakdown in the

father’s relationship with the children such that there was only

sporadic visitation with them, leading to a concomitant increase in

her child-rearing expenses. The evidence presented at the hearing

establishes that such a breakdown occurred.

We agree with the mother that “the complete breakdown in the
-2- 951 

CAF 13-00206 

visitation arrangement, which effectively extinguished [the father’s]

support obligation, constituted an unanticipated change in

circumstances that created the need for modification of the child

support obligations” (Matter of Gravlin v Ruppert, 98 NY2d 1, 6; see

Matter of McCormick v McCormick, 97 AD3d 682, 683; Matter of Joslin v

Sullivan, 12 AD3d 1070, 1070). We therefore reverse the order insofar

as appealed from, reinstate the amended petition, and remit the matter

to Family Court for a determination of the appropriate amount of

support to be paid by the father, after a further hearing if

necessary.

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### HOLDER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Virginia Searcy BARR, Appellee.

No. J-52.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Nov. 21, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1967.

Justin J. Lipman, of Coker & Carlon, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

*251Charles D. Stewart, Fort Walton Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the decree of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See 6 Fla.Jur., Conditional Sales, § 57.62; Garrett & Co. v. Mercantile Natl. Bank (5th Cir. 1941), 120 F.2d 821; Linick v. Lamm (Fla.App.1962), 143 So.2d 551.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2001 

To require that textile and apparel articles acquired for use by executive 

agencies be manufactured from articles, materials, or supplies entirely 

grown, produced, or manufactured in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2014 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require that textile and apparel articles acquired for use 

by executive agencies be manufactured from articles, materials, or supplies entirely grown, produced, or manufactured in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wear American Act 

5 of 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2001 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PROCURE TEXTILE AND AP2 PAREL ARTICLES MANUFACTURED ENTIRELY 

3 OF DOMESTIC COMPONENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition 

6 Regulation Council shall amend the Federal Acquisition 

7 Regulation to require Federal agencies to procure textiles 

8 and apparel articles, including components for such arti9 cles, that are manufactured in the United States wholly 

10 from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or 

11 manufactured in the United States. The Federal Acquisi12 tion Regulation, as so amended, shall provide that the re13 quirement applicable to textiles and apparel articles is sub14 ject to the same exceptions applicable to other articles, 

15 materials, and supplies under paragraphs (1) and (2) of 

16 section 8302(a) of title 41, United States Code. 

17 (b) TRAINING.—The head of each Federal agency 

18 shall ensure that each member of the acquisition work19 force of the agency who participates substantially in the 

20 agency’s acquisition of textiles and apparel articles on a 

21 regular basis receives training on the requirements imple22 mented pursuant to subsection (a) not later than 180 days 

23 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,811<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,391
<INVENTORY>                                     27,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,353
<PP&E>                                         122,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,006
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,750
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,021<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,241
<SALES>                                        188,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,320
<CGS>                                          140,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  140,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   345
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,637
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,637
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.15
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE NET OF ALLOWANCES
<F2>OTHER SE INCLUDES TREASURY STOCK
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2014362EN.01001101.xml

| 14.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/11

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 362/08

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 13.9.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.9.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or group of stocks | SOL/8AB. |
| Species | Common sole (solea solea) |
| Zone | VIIIa and VIIIb |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 45/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

13.9.2014

Duration

13.9.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Belgium

Stock or group of stocks

SOL/8AB.

Species

Common sole (solea solea)

solea solea

Zone

VIIIa and VIIIb

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

45/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2013293EN.01000601.xml

| 9.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7026 — Amvest/NPM Capital/DGH Participaties/Jopli Participaties/Erve Hulsgorst Participaties/DLH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 293/02

On 2 October 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7026. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7026. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB02-CN.58**
**Contact:**  Mark TolbertPublic Information Office(301) 457-3691/457-3620 (fax)(301) 457-1038 (TDD)e-mail:  2000usa@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2002

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Demographic Profile for the U.S. Virgin Islands

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the Population and Housing Profile: 2000 for the  U.S. Virgin Islands, a table that includes Census 2000 data on topics such as age and sex, race, household relationship, school enrollment, place of birth, income and poverty, and housing occupancy and tenure (whether the occupant owns or rents).

The profile includes 56 data items in all, plus percentage distributions.

For information about how to order paper copies of the Census 2000 demographic profiles, contact Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, (301) 763-INFO (4636); or email:  webmaster@census.gov  .

For local context, contact the U.S. Virgin Islands Eastern Caribbean Center, University of the Virgin Islands, (340) 693-1027.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6


September 23, 1999


Mr. Laurence Leslie
8310 208th Street SW
Edmonds, WA 98026


Dear Laurence,

We are very pleased to offer you the position of Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer with Data Dimensions, Inc. (DDI). You will assume your
new positions and associated duties effective September 23, 1999.

Your compensation package will consist of:

-     Monthly salary of $14,583.33 paid in accordance with our payroll schedule,
      which is currently biweekly. This is an exempt position as classified by
      the Fair Labor Standard Act and is not eligible for overtime pay for hours
      worked in excess of forty per week.

-     Options to acquire 60,000 shares of Data Dimensions, Inc. stock in
      accordance with our Incentive Stock Option Program. These options will be
      priced at the fair market value at the close of business the day prior to
      your start date.

-     Your 1999 bonus will be based on your current 1999 bonus structure.

-     You will continue to receive your current benefits in accordance with the
      DDI benefit plans commensurate with your position.

-     In the event your employment is terminated for other than cause, your
      salary, benefits and stock options will be extended for six months. In the
      event there is a change in Company ownership, your salary and benefits
      will be extended for six months and your stock options will be completely
      vested.

Your employment with DDI is voluntarily entered into and you may resign at any
time. Similarly, DDI is free to end the employment relationship at any time with
or without notice or cause, where it believes it is in DDI's best interest to do
so. This relationship is and will always be one of voluntary employment,
terminable at will.

Laurence, I look forward to continue working with you to make our company the
industry leader.

Sincerely,


Peter A. Allen
President and
Chief Executive Officer
# C_2013008EN.01000201.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 January 2013

2013/C 8/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3274 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,18 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4611 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82320 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6248 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2157 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3490 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,613 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,56 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6975 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1000 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3792 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3489 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2561 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3060 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2900 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5801 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6270 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 401,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5471 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2523 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5735 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 789,62 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0101 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,950 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2307 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,180 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7013 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7598 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,6880 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3274

JPY

Japanese yen

118,18

DKK

Danish krone

7,4611

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82320

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6248

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2157

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3490

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,613

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,56

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6975

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1000

RON

Romanian leu

4,3792

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3489

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2561

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3060

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2900

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5801

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6270

KRW

South Korean won

1 401,12

ZAR

South African rand

11,5471

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2523

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5735

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 789,62

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0101

PHP

Philippine peso

53,950

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2307

THB

Thai baht

40,180

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7013

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7598

INR

Indian rupee

72,6880

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Glenda Louise CARTER, Petitioner, v. Larry J. CARTER, Respondent.

No. 40221.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 19, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 238 So.2d 461.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ„ concur.
----

----

EXHIBIT(32)(b)

| (1)   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |                                                   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      February 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Donna L. Belusar                              |   |
|                         |   | Donna      L. Belusar                                  |   |
|                         |   | Senior      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                         |   |                                                   |   |
# S

- 260

(sump pit)

Cooling tower

blowdown

ASU

blowdown RCC distillate

Water Treatment Pond Petcoke pile runoff &

Adjacent roadway

Slag pile

runoff Stormwater

runoff

Stormwater Pond Outfall to

Wabash River RCC distillate

– This is the sample point that appears to be part of the basis for the

proposed limits on the gasification process

. RCC distillate water is very clean

distillate water

.

S

- 260

– Generally, the waters in this sump pit are placed back into the process

.

However during outages or other times when the amount of water is too much for

the process to handle, this water is sent to the water treatment pond when

appropriate

. Waters that could be fed into this S

- 260 area include :

• Steam drains

• Oxygen & air compressor sumps

• Concrete wash down

• Boiler blowdown

• Building drain

• Stormwater runoff from within gasification plant pad

• Process line & equipment cleaning (generally limited to outages)

ASU blowdown

- Air separation unit (ASU) chiller (industrial water) blowdown 

# sgSolutions , LLC (Indiana)

– Flow Diagram of Gasification Wastestreams

January 31, 2014
#### Willie Earl BIVINS v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39355.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 228 So.2d 922.
No. 11473.

#### The City of Columbus et al. *v.*Vogle.

Decided January 18, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of.Franklin county.

*Mr. George S. Marshall,*city solicitor, and *Messrs. Weinland, Hoover, Carter & Davies,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Arnold, Morton & Irvine,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Davis, Sitauck and' Price, JJ., concur. Summers,- C. J., dissents.
# C_2013330EN.01000401.xml

| 14.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 November 2013

2013/C 330/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3415 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4589 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83990 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9928 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2316 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3380 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,055 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,66 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7029 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2020 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4638 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7528 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4409 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4071 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4008 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6283 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6747 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 438,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8806 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1735 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 319,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3085 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,722 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,0550 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,365 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1205 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6696 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,1060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3415

JPY

Japanese yen

133,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4589

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83990

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9928

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2316

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3380

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,055

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,66

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7029

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2020

RON

Romanian leu

4,4638

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7528

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4409

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4071

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4008

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6283

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6747

KRW

South Korean won

1 438,53

ZAR

South African rand

13,8806

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1735

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 319,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3085

PHP

Philippine peso

58,722

RUB

Russian rouble

44,0550

THB

Thai baht

42,365

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1205

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6696

INR

Indian rupee

85,1060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

p0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140058

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140058 COA: 292732 Wayne CC: 05-010134-FC THOMAS THEODORE DIXON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).