alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011262EN.01000102.xml

| 6.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6336 — Walter Frey Holding/Mitsubishi Motors Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 262/02

On 29 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6336. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6336. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

March 31, 2010

p0324

Order 

March 31, 2010

139884

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139884

COA: 286046

Mason CC: 07-001876-FC

WILLIAM FRANCIS COCKREAM,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 12, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1878 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 138 ) ll-B-5 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 11/28/20081:21:26

PM Sheet 138of 145P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-B-5 1 

## PENDIN GCONFIDENTIA L

Th e following informatio n i s locate d in th e confidentia l file s o f th e Director , Emissio n Standard s Division , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standards , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina 27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia l pending fina l determinatio n b yth e Administrato r an

d i s no t availabl e fo r publi c inspection . W . Floyd , Radian Corporation , t o Proces s Vent s Docke t A-90-19 , Decembe r 1990 , HO NNESHAP : Industry Characteristics/Ethylen e Glyco l Monobuty l Ether . 4 7 pages . CB I Documen t Contro l No . 86/23 , PPS-51 .
# C_2011336EN.01001301.xml

| 17.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/13

---

Special Report No 11/2011 ‘Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective?’

2011/C 336/10

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 11/2011 ‘Do the design and management of the geographical indications scheme allow it to be effective?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1****OFFICER’S SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     Each of the undersigned officers of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevadacorporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that: (i) The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  (ii) The information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, atand for the periods indicated.Dated: November 7, 2005         By:                                           /s/ Robert N. Crouch II    Robert N. Crouch II, Executive Vice    President, Chief Financial Officer and
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Aging Population

The Newsroom site has been redesigned and relocated.  This is the archive area.

For the most current releases please visit the redesigned newsroom at:https://www.census.gov/newsroom.html

For previous press releases please contact the Public Information Office at 301-763-3030.

### 2012

                          - December 10:   2010 Census Report Shows More Than 80 Percent of Centenarians are Women

### 2011

                          - November 17:   Census Bureau Releases Comprehensive Analysis of Fast-Growing 90-and-Older Population

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 52717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21475]

[[Page 52717]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9724-1]

Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption--Class I Hazardous Waste 
Injection; Cornerstone Chemical Company, Waggaman, LA

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a no migration petition 
reissuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to 
the land disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid 
Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has 
been granted to Cornerstone for four Class I injection wells located at 
Waggaman, Louisiana. The company has adequately demonstrated to the 
satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency by the petition 
reissuance application and supporting documentation that, to a 
reasonable degree of certainty, there will be no migration of hazardous 
constituents from the injection zone for as long as the waste remains 
hazardous. This final decision allows the continued underground 
injection by Cornerstone, of the specific restricted hazardous wastes 
identified in this exemption, into Class I hazardous waste injection 
Wells 2, 3 4B and 5 at the Waggaman, Louisiana facility until June 30, 
2016, unless EPA moves to terminate this exemption. Additional 
conditions included in this final decision may be reviewed by 
contacting the Region 6 Ground Water/UIC Section. A public notice was 
issued June 28, 2012. The public comment period closed on August 13, 
2012, and no comments were received. This decision constitutes final 
Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal. This decision may 
be reviewed/appealed in compliance with the Administrative Procedure 
Act.

DATES: This action was effective as of August 20, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition and all pertinent information 
relating thereto are on file at the following location: Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Quality Protection Division, Source 
Water Protection Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

    Dated: August 23, 2012.
Wren Stenger,
Acting Deputy Director, Water Quality Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-21475 Filed 8-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EXHIBIT 11.1
<TABLE>

                                   ACCOM, INC.
             STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                            PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
<CAPTION>
 
                                                                                                                               
                                                                Three months ended                  Nine months ended
                                                                ------------------                  -----------------
                                                             June 28,        June 30,            June 28,        June 30,
                                                               1997            1996                1997            1996
                                                          ---------------- -------------- --- --------------- ----------------
<S>                                                               <C>           <C>                <C>               <C>


Net income (loss)                                                   $77          $(876)            $(4,678)           $(921)
                                                          ================ ============== === =============== ================


Shares used in Computation of Net Income (Loss)
Per Share (1):
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding               6,592          6,453               6,577            6,431
Net effect of potentially dilutive stock options                    273             --                  --               --
                                                          ---------------- -------------- --- --------------- ----------------
         Shares used in net income (loss) per share
computation                                                       6,865          6,453               6,577            6,431
                                                          ================ ============== === =============== ================


Net income (loss) per share                                       $0.01         $(0.14)             $(0.71)          $(0.14)
                                                          ================ ============== === =============== ================


<FN>

(1) In net loss  periods,  conversion  of  equivalent  shares  from  potentially
dilutive  stock  options are excluded from the  computations  as their effect is
anti-dilutive to the computation.
</FN>
</TABLE>


                                      -15-
#### BANNERMAN v. BANNERMAN.

No. 36915.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 204 So.2d 234.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1396 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1396

     To authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency to award 
mitigation financial assistance in certain areas affected by wildfires.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2013

   Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency to award 
mitigation financial assistance in certain areas affected by wildfires.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILDFIRE MITIGATION ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5187) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Post Disaster Mitigation Assistance.--The President may 
provide hazard mitigation assistance in accordance with section 404 in 
any area in which assistance was provided under this section, whether 
or not a major disaster had been declared.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 
and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 404(a) (42 U.S.C. 5170c(a))--
                    (A) by inserting before the first period ``, or any 
                area in which assistance was provided under section 
                420''; and
                    (B) in the third sentence, by inserting ``or event 
                under section 420'' after ``major disaster'' each place 
                that term appears; and
            (2) in section 322 (e)(1) (42 U.S.C. 5165(e)(1)), by 
        inserting ``or event under section 420'' after ``major 
        disaster'' each place that term appears.
                                 <all>
```
H. R. 2868

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 600 Camp Street in New Orleans,

Louisiana, as the ‘‘John Minor Wisdom United States Court of Appeals Building’’,

and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 600 Camp Street in New

Orleans, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John

Minor Wisdom United States Court of Appeals Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John

Minor Wisdom United States Court of Appeals Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
II 

Calendar No. 515 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1965 

[Report No. 113–228] 

To amend the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract Extension 

Act to permit the Secretary of the Interior to extend the contract for 

certain water services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2014 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. WALSH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JULY 31, 2014 

Reported by Ms. LANDRIEU, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract 

Extension Act to permit the Secretary of the Interior 

to extend the contract for certain water services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1965 RS

1 SECTION 1. EAST BENCH IRRIGATION DISTRICT CONTRACT 

2 EXTENSION. 

3 Section 2(1) of the East Bench Irrigation District 

4 Water Contract Extension Act (Public Law 112–139; 126 

5 Stat. 390) is amended by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘10 years’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 515 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1965 

[Report No. 113–228] 

A BILL 

To amend the East Bench Irrigation District Water 

water services. of the Interior to extend the contract for certain Contract Extension Act to permit the Secretary 

JULY 31, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered August 25, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00611-CV

THE CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee

V.

MILLWEE-JACKSON JOINT VENTURE AND STEPHEN M. MILLWEE,

Appellees/Cross-Appellants

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-04-07287-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees/cross-appellants’ unopposed first motion for 

extension of time to file their cross-appellants’ brief. Appellees/cross-appellants 

seek an extension to September 21, 2020, the same deadline as the current deadline 

for appellant’s brief. 

We note Local Rule 5 requires an appellee/cross-appellant to file a combined 

appellee’s and cross-appellant’s brief. See 5th Tex. App. (Dallas) Loc. R. 5(a)(2). 

Accordingly, we DENY the motion as premature.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Marital Status & Living Arrangements

The Newsroom site has been redesigned and relocated.  This is the archive area.

For the most current releases please visit the redesigned newsroom at:https://www.census.gov/newsroom.html

For previous press releases please contact the Public Information Office at 301-763-3030.

### 2011

                          - August 25:   Divorce Rates Highest in the South, Lowest in the Northeast, Census Bureau Reports
                          - May 18:   Census Bureau Reports 55 Percent Have Married One Time

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### Lucy Butler et al., Claimants, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 32131.)

Court of Claims,

November 7, 1953.

*649
      *John J. O’Connor, Jr.,*for claimants.

• *Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Fred I. ZabrisJcie*of counsel), for defendant.

Sylvester, J.

On this motion to dismiss the claim, it appears that the claimant, Lucy Butler, sustained injuries when she was caused to fall in the private residence of the Clerk of the Surrogate ’s Court, Suffolk County. Claimant had gone to the premises for the sole purpose of having her deposition taken as a subscribing witness to a will offered for probate and fell on a ‘' scatter rug ’ ’ placed over a highly polished and slippery floor of the entrance hall. It is not urged herein that the property was either owned, operated, maintained or rented by the State.

Without deciding the issue of whether the Clerk of the Surrogate’s Court was acting in the capacity of an agent of the State, it cannot be said that the negligence of the clerk in the maintenance of his own private quarters is attributable to the State.

Any alleged failure of due care on the part of the clerk in this regard cannot be said to have occurred while he was acting in the business of his master and in the scope of his employment. The doctrine of *respondeat superior*may not be so extended. The applicable rule would make for liability where the acts of the servant are done within the general scope of his employment while engaged in his master’s business and done with a view to the furtherance of that business and the master’s interest, whether the act be done negligently, wantonly or even willfully. (2A Warren on Negligence [2d ed.], § 2.68, pars. 22-24.) Here, the negligent maintenance of his dwelling had no direct relation to the performance of his duties as an employee of the State.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted. Submit order on notice. '
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

t0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148694 & (123)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148694

COA: 306499 

Wayne CC: 11-004382-FC

MAURICE WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

miscellaneous relief is DENIED.