alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. L. B. F., a child, Appellee.

No. 78-137.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 21, 1978.

*1301Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Martha J. Cook and Eula T. Mason, Asst, Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and David J. Abbey, Asst. Public Defender, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Because of the factual circumstances presented here we hesitate to affirm the order of the trial court discharging appellee, L.B.F., a child, for want of speedy trial, however, the rule1 is explicit in its terms, applies to all equally, and to be effective must be enforced. Therefore, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., OTT, J., and PIERCE, WILLIAM C., J. (Ret.), concur.

1

. Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.180(b) Speedy Trial provides:

> If the adjudicatory hearing is not begun within ninety (90) days or an extension thereof as hereinafter provided the petition shall be dismissed with prejudice.
# C_2014026EN.01000201.xml

| 29.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6924 — Refresco Group/Pride Foods)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 26/03

On 4 October 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6924. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6924. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
No. 11792.

#### The Sun Publishing Co. *v.*Clark.

Decided February 1, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Clark county.

*Mr. John M. Cole*and *Mr. Burt Rabbitts,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Stafford & Arthur,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 183 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 183

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for fairness 
            in hospital payments under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2013

 Mrs. McCaskill (for herself and Mr. Coburn) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for fairness 
            in hospital payments under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hospital Payment Fairness Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. SUNSET OF MEDICARE HOSPITAL PAYMENT PROVISION.

    Section 3141 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395ww note) is amended by inserting ``and before October 1, 
2013,'' after ``October 1, 2010,''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

**THEDAYTON POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

The undersigned officer of The Dayton Powerand Light Company (the “Issuer”) hereby certify that the Issuer’s Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, which this certificateaccompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Issuer.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 

 

 

 
| /s/ John J. Gillen                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------|
| John  J. Gillen                                    |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Date: March 14, 2005

 

 

 

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


Board of Directors and Shareholders
Crown Crafts, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Crown Crafts,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 1, 2001 and April 2, 2000 and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in
shareholders' (deficit) equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended April 1, 2001. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed at Item 14. These financial statements and financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Crown Crafts, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of April 1, 2001 and April 2, 2000, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
April 1, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Also in our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basis consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
July 6, 2001
(July 23, 2001 as to Notes 6 and 14)


<PAGE>   2
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
033-64499 of Crown Crafts, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report
dated July 6, 2001 (July 23, 2001 as to Notes 6 and 14), appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Crown Crafts, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year
ended April 1, 2001.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
September 20, 2001
Jeff L. Nehring Nehring Law Office 113 E. Broadway Suite 1 Williston, North Dakota 58801 Phone (701) 577-5555 info@nehringlaw.com Attorneys for Appellant



### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0599

SKYLER LEVNO,

Plaintiff and Appellant, ORDER TO
DISMISS APPEAL

vs.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Defendant and Appellee

.

[¶1.] This matter having come before this Honorable Court upon the Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal. The Court having revi ewed the motion of the Appellant, being fully advised and appraised of these matters, now therefore makes the following decisions:

[¶2.] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Appe llant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal is
GRANTED.

Dated: _____________

____________________________ Montana Supreme Court Justice

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 9 2022

12/09/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0599
#### GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Armando C. HERNANDEZ et al., Appellees.

No. 72-211.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00505

- CR

JUAN GARCIA CERVANTES A/K/A JUAN CERVANTES v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR

- 3283

- 22

- A

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APP EALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 9, 2023
#### In the Interest of S. J. Y. (16), a child.

No. 72-617.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 14, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 13, 1973.

Carling H. Stedman, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Peter F. LaPorte, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The minor appellant was adjudged “to be a traffic offender” and assigned punishment by the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court in and for Dade County, Florida. During the pendency in this court of an appeal from the judgment, this court granted appellant’s motion for a temporary release of jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of supplementing the record. Thereafter, the trial judge entered an order as follows: “That it now appears that said child was in fact convicted and assessed a fine in another jurisdiction for the same offense for which she was brought before the court.”

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence herein appealed are reversed and set aside. See Bizzell v. State, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 735.

Reversed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before September 7, 2018. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before September 7, 2018.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for hearing must be 
                        ( print page 39128)
                        sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All request for hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division (“Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on June 29, 2018, Clinical Supplies Management Holdings, Inc., 342 42nd Street South, Fargo, North Dakota 58103-1132 applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleMarihuana
7360
ITetrahydrocannabinols
7370
I
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substances to manufacture bulk controlled substances for use in clinical trials only. Dated: July 31, 2018. John J. Martin, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-16939 Filed 8-7-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32

 

FORM OF 906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

David G. Whalen, the Chief Executive Officer and Kevin F. Mahoney, the Chief Financial Officer of A.T. Cross Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
Exhibit 10.6







ASSIGNMENT OF LLC MEMBERSHIP INTEREST

















For good and valuable consideration. the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Ronald Louis Knori, a resident of Longview, Washington (the "Holder") and the sole owner of 100% of the membership interests (the "Membership Interests") of EcoCab Portland, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company (the "LLC") does hereby assign, transfer, and convey to Liberated Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the "Company") 100% of the Membership Interests of LLC.  The Holder warrants that he is the sole owner of 100% of the Membership Interests of the LLC and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Liberated Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation, as his attorney-in-fact to transfer the Membership Interests on the books of the LLC with full power of substitution in the premises.  The Holder hereby represents and warrants to the Company as follows:







1.    The Holder is the sole owner of 100% of the Membership Interests of the LLC.







2.    The Holder has all necessary capacity, power and authority to execute and deliver this assignment, to make and agree to the representations and warranties contained herein, and to carry out the Holder's obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.







3.    The Holder is the sole legal and beneficial owner of the LLC and all of the Membership Interests, , free and clear of all liens, charges, security interests and other encumbrances or adverse claims.







4.    Other than the Membership Interests being conveyed hereby, the Holder owns no other ownership interest(s) in the LLC or options, warrants or other rights to purchase interests of the LLC and has no interest in, or right of any kind to, any other securities of the LLC.







5.    The Holder is not a party to any voting trusts, shareholder agreements, proxies, rights of first refusal, rights of first offer or any other agreements or understandings with respect to the Membership Interests.







6.    This transfer does not constitute a breach of any agreements, violate any terms of any agreements which the Holder and LLC are a party, or cause an acceleration of any provisions of any agreements to which the Holder and LLC are a party.







Electronic delivery of a signed copy of this Assignment will have the same binding effect as delivering a signed paper copy, and will be deemed an original.







HOLDER

















RONALD LOUIS KNORI                                                                                                                                          


Ronald Louis Knori







Dated effected as of October 31, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                       153
<INVENTORY>                                     24,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,914
<PP&E>                                          28,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,825
<BONDS>                                         14,533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,376
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,920
<SALES>                                        101,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,233
<CGS>                                           65,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,408)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (951)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,457)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)
        

</TABLE>
New Business Development

    The area's largest employer and globally renowned Fortune 500
organization, Corning Incorporated, is having a revival of its own.  It is
obviously important that we follow and understand the progress of this ever
expanding organization due to the tremendous impact it has upon the economy
and well being of the citizens and businesses that make up the City of
Corning.  In the next few years to come, culminating in the spring of 2000,
Corning Incorporated will be investing approximately $250 million in new and
expanded manufacturing facilities, research facilities and its famous Museum
of Glass.  Several years ago Corning Incorporated decided to totally renovate
the Glass Museum by year 2000 to celebrate its 50th anniversary and the 150th
anniversary of Corning Incorporated.  This massive renovation represents an
investment of $58 million and is expected to draw 650,000 visitors annually,
nearly double the current figure.  In order to welcome these visitors and
benefit from these resources, the entire community needed to make numerous
physical and promotional changes.  This undertaking was carefully put together
as the project came to be known as April 2000.  This project encompasses so
many facets that it is reviewed as a separate section in this report.
    Without a doubt, the most important economic development to occur in the
past several years was the announcement that Corning Incorporated would
construct a 400,000 square foot, $40 million manufacturing facility in Erwin
to produce products for its Opto-Electronic Components Division.  This plant
will provide up to 1,000 new manufacturing jobs and will be partially operable
by year end, 1997.  The plant will produce products that combine with fiber
optic cable to upgrade the system, amplify optical signals, couple optic
systems, etc.  Corning Incorporated will also expend $4 million to enlarge its
center for fiber optic testing.
    Perhaps the most ambitious of Corning Incorporated's many projects is
the expansion of its impressive Sullivan Science Research Center located
adjacent to the new components plant.  This $125 million expansion will double
the size of the research center.  These additional buildings, totaling 328,000
square feet, will provide additional laboratories to create and test products,
conference space and a five story draw tower for specialty optic fibers.  500
additional employees will be needed, many who will have advanced scientific,
engineering and mathematics degrees.
    The expansion-minded company, which earned $487 million on $3.7 billion
in sales in 1996 is also investing $20 million to add to its recently
constructed world headquarters building in the center of the city.  The new
west wing will house some 350 workers in the Telecommunications Products and
Photonics Technologies Divisions.  All of these major projects will eventually
have a significant impact in terms of new job opportunities, local tax
revenues, tourist related businesses and new housing developments to name a
few.
#### Natalie R. HOFFMAN, Appellant, v. Donald A. HOFFMAN, Appellee.

No. 595.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 25, 1967.

Frank James Kruzich, Lake Park, for appellant.

Harry Lée Anstead, of Sullivan & An-stead, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Natalie R. Hoffman, appeals from a final decree of divorce granting plaintiff a divorce and ordering the defendant, Donald A. Hoffman, to pay alimony and support, contending that the award is insufficient.

There is substantial competent evidence in the transcript of testimony to support the award and we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.

Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees is denied.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs, and oral argument of counsel, and from such consideration, no reversible error is found.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, J., and SPECTOR, SAMUEL, and NANCE, L. CLAYTON, Associate Judges, concur.