alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ESP Inspire 1 Preflight Checklist

Before Energizing System

1. Arms up and locked in flight position

2. Props installed on correct motors

3. Prop s tight ened and locks in place

4. Props clean and undamaged

5. Motors turn smoothly

6. Batter y secure

7. Wiring in good condition

8. Flight control system connections secure

9. Transmitter on

a. Transmitter vehicle select: SeedScout

b. Transmitter battery level > flight minimum

10. Ground Control S tation (GCS) on

a. Waypoints loaded , as appropriate

b. Waypoints in clear airspace, according to UAS flight rules

11. Flight b attery voltage >

= 90% maximum pack voltage

a. >= 22.7V for 6S LiPo flight pack

12. Weather forecast

a. VMC for duration of planned flight + 30 minutes

b. Winds < 15 kts steady, 25 kts gust



## Energize System

13. Power system on

14. Monitor for correct startup sequence

15. On GCS :

a. Communications link established

b. GPS positioning locked

c. Accelerometers calibrated

d. Compass calibrated

e. Transmitter control direction correct

f. Altitude limitation set

g. Distance limitation set



## Starting Motors

16. Position UAS at launch location

17. Estab lish position as “home”

18. Reset flight timer

19. Verify desired flight control mode

20. Verify surroundings are clear

a. “Clear Props!”
#### Eli JENSEN and Virginia Jensen, Appellants, v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARRISBURG, a foreign corporation, Mary Spanolia and Charles Spanolia, Appellees.

No. 2162.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 3, 1968.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James F. Minnet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.12



FOURTH AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of October 17, 2016 by and between HANNIE DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Louisiana business corporation (“Seller”), and SENIORS INVESTMENTS II, LLC a Delaware limited liability company (“Buyer”).  
WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer previously entered into that certain Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Original Agreement”, and as amended from time to time, the “Agreement”) dated as of March 31, 2016 with respect to certain premises commonly known as “Rosewood Retirement & Assisted Living” located in the City of Lafayette, Louisiana, more particularly described on Schedule 3.1(a) to the Agreement.  
WHEREAS, the parties desire to make certain modifications to the Agreement as are more particularly described herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:  
1.    Defined Terms.  All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.   
2.    Extension of the Study Period.  The definition of “Study Period” (as defined in Section 12.1 of the Agreement) shall be amended in its entirety to mean “the period beginning on the Effective Date and ending at 11:59 PM PST on November 11, 2016” such that the Study Period shall expire at 11:59 PM PST on November 11, 2016.  All references in the Agreement to the “expiration of the Study Period” shall be deemed to occur at 11:59 PM PST on November 11, 2016.
3.    Closing Date.  Clause (A) of the third sentence of Section 5.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: “on November 30, 2016”.
4.    Other Portfolio Closing Condition.  Section 13.1(s) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.
5.    Except as expressly modified hereby, the Agreement is hereby ratified and shall remain in full force and effect, enforceable in accordance with its terms.”
6.    This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and executed counterparts may be delivered via facsimile or e-mail, the parties agreeing to be bound by such delivery.  
7.    In the event of any inconsistency between this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall govern.


	
			
	 
	1
	 

	 












This Amendment has been executed as of the date and year first above written.


BUYER:
	
			
	Seniors Investments II, LLC

	a Delaware limited liability company

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Carl Mittendorff

	Name:
	Carl Mittendorff

	Title:
	Sole Member






SELLER:
	
			
	Hannie Development, Inc.

	a Louisiana business corporation

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Maurice Hannie

	Name:
	President Maurice Hannie

	Title:
	President






	
			
	 
	S-1
# C_2012253EN.01000201.xml

| 23.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 August 2012

2012/C 253/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2448 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 98,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4484 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78785 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3412 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2009 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3520 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,968 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0761 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4930 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2360 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,1926 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2355 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6560 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5387 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5582 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 413,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3525 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9067 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4790 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 826,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8852 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,692 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,062 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5119 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4220 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,0760 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2448

JPY

Japanese yen

98,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4484

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78785

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3412

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2009

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3520

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,968

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0761

RON

Romanian leu

4,4930

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2360

AUD

Australian dollar

1,1926

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2355

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6560

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5387

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5582

KRW

South Korean won

1 413,50

ZAR

South African rand

10,3525

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9067

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4790

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 826,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8852

PHP

Philippine peso

52,692

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6900

THB

Thai baht

39,062

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5119

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4220

INR

Indian rupee

69,0760

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leon WILSON, Jr. v. Roy WEBB.

No. 53653.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 14, 1973.

In re: The State of Louisiana by and through the Town of Logansport applying for writs of certiorari, review, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

Writ denied. Argensinger v. Hamlin.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the trial judge was correct in his application of the law.
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

63) IV-C-29 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:54 AM Sheet 63 of 232 
P.2 

.*>'«" "«* . 

15522/ 

*•• PRO**0 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

JAN I 5 1988 

fi-QI-JLiOFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Michael G. Oxley 

House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Oxley: 

Thank you for passing along the comments of Mr. Theodore 

Schluter and Mr. Gerald Clark concerning EPA's proposal to 

require onboard refueling emission controls. Be assured that 

these comments will be considered in the next phase of our" 

rulemaking process. We will also be placing them in the public 

docket for the Rulemaking. 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>                   5
<CIK>                         0000949373
<NAME>                        New World Coffee - Manhattan Bagel, Inc.

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         MAR-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                                    3,152
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             3,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                               1,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         10,175
<PP&E>                                                    8,921
<DEPRECIATION>                                            1,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           36,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    10,233
<BONDS>                                                  15,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                     20
<OTHER-SE>                                               10,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             36,490
<SALES>                                                  16,926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         19,368
<CGS>                                                     7,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             7,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          4,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             892
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                892
<EPS-BASIC>                                               .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .04



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE EARNINGS STATEMENT AND THE BALANCE SHEET AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998 
<CASH>                                             969 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1418 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89 
<INVENTORY>                                       1000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4456 
<PP&E>                                            5860 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2592 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10363 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2855 
<BONDS>                                            384<F1> 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                        279 
<COMMON>                                             5 
<OTHER-SE>                                        5192 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10363 
<SALES>                                           3240 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3303 
<CGS>                                              978 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      978 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   566<F2> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    493 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       158 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                335 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       335 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64 
<FN> 
<F1>EXCLUDES COMPANY'S GUARANTEE OF ESOP DEBT OF 217. 
<F2>ONLY INCLUDES R&D EXPENSE. 
</FN> 
        


</TABLE>
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business & Economy    >Quarterly Services
   Quarterly Services
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  The Quarterly Services Survey (QSS) is the only source of service industry indicator performance providing timely estimates of revenue and expenses for selected service industries. The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) uses QSS data in its estimates of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
 Read More
 Latest Quarterly Services Report
   Latest Press Release Tables
   Release Schedule
 Announcements Benchmarking
Effective with the March 2024 release for the fourth quarter of 2023, seasonally adjusted quarterly services estimates have been revised to reflect historical corrections, new seasonal factors, and results of the 2022 Service Annual Survey. Not seasonally adjusted estimates were revised with the February 2024 advance release for the fourth quarter of 2023 to reflect historical corrections and results of the 2022 Service Annual Survey.**API**
The URL for the economic indicators data in the Census Bureau API (Application Programming Interface) has been updated to add /timeseries/. Examples can be found on the Developers' webpage.
 You May Be Interested In You May Be Interested In  INTERACTIVE TOOL Time Series/Trend Charts
                        Create your own customizable time series.
                        View More
   Mobile Application FRED Mobile App
                        Receive the latest updates on the nation's key economic indicators by downloading the FRED App for both Apple and Android devices. FRED, the signature database of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, now incorporates the Census Bureau's 13 economic indicators.
                        View More
   AROUND THE BUREAU Related Topics
                        See other pages that are related to this program.
                        View More


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Sinicropi,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Joseph Sinicropi
--------------------
Joseph Sinicropi
Chief Financial Officer
April 30, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4939

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARTEZ COLEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CR-01-506)

Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 28, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William T. Toal, JOHNSON, TOAL & BATTISTE, P.A., Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellant. J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., United States

Attorney, Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Martez Coleman was convicted after a jury trial of

membership in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and

to distribute cocaine base and powder, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 846 (2000), possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (2000), killing, or counseling,

commanding, inducing, or procuring, and aiding and abetting in a

killing while involved in a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000), 21 U.S.C. § 848(e)(1)(A) (2000), and

using a firearm in a drug crime or crime of violence, murder, and

aiding and abetting in murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2

(2000), 18 U.S.C. § 924(j) (2000). Coleman was sentenced to life

sentences for these offenses. Coleman has timely appealed. 

On appeal, Coleman asserts that the district court erred

by (1) allowing the Government to bolster the testimony of two

Government witnesses; (2) permitting the Government to introduce a

witness’ testimony that effectively punished Coleman for exercising

his right to remain silent; and (3) denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33

motion for a new trial. We review a district court’s evidentiary

rulings for abuse of discretion. General Elec. Co. v. Joiner, 522

U.S. 136, 141-42 (1997). A district court’s denial of a Fed. R.

Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial is also reviewed for abuse of

discretion. United States v. Arrington, 757 F.2d 1484, 1486 (4th

Cir. 1985).
- 3 -

Following careful review of the record, we reject

Coleman’s claims as meritless. The testimony of the two witnesses

in question was not impermissibly bolstered, United States v.

Lewis, 10 F.3d 1086, 1089 (4th Cir. 1993); Coleman’s right to

remain silent was not infringed by the testimony of another

witness, United States v. Whitehead, 618 F.2d 523, 527 (4th Cir.

1980); and Coleman failed to satisfy the requirements necessary to

receive a new trial, United States v. Chavis, 880 F.2d 788, 793

(4th Cir. 1989).

Accordingly, we affirm Coleman’s conviction and sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2001 4181 4206 4175 4289 4304 4367 4426 4432 4339 4384 4332 4341

2002 4399 4296 4357 4361 4334 4396 4507 4455 4306 4356 4333 4341

2003 4431 4448 4344 4356 4419 4490 4611 4642 4590 4529 4433 4503

2004 4586 4497 4597 4691 4687 4817 4912 4800 4787 4767 4759 4789

2005 4961 4876 4858 4878 4868 4925 5026 4960 4871 4924 4905 4959

2006 4969 5035 4999 4915 5063 5045 5044 5086 4973 4998 5124 5094

2007 5116 5122 4973 5156 5051 5159 5145 5253 5094 5110 5007 4897

2008 4892 4931 4900 5036 5073 5033 5047 5003 5034 4821 4912 4891

2009 4893 4931 4920 4993 4978 5123 5137 5285 5215 5133 5219 5161

2010 5067 5097 5016 5027 5099 5174 5249 5236 5173 5304 5208 5210

2011 5165 5217 5267 5345 5435 5471 5501 5467 5227

Not in labor force

Number in thousands

55 to 59 years

2001 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU05000094

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 55-59 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:35 AM)
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Annual

4315

4370

4483

4724

4918

5029

5090

4964

5082

5155

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:35 AM)
#### Julian Donald GREGORIE v. The HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY et al.

No. 60524.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline, 348 So.2d 186.

Writ denied.

MARCUS, J.,

would grant the writ.
#### Colin D. WEST, Appellant, v. Wylodene B. GRIFFIN, Appellee.

No. 1268.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 27, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; W. A. Pattishall, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.