alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2984 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2984

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
   relating to an urban mobility project for New York City, New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 1993

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
   relating to an urban mobility project for New York City, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That item 9 of the 
table set forth in section 1106(b)(2) of the Intermodal Surface 
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2044) is amended by 
striking ``Improvements on Miller Highway in New York City, NY'' and 
inserting ``Improvements to the 72nd Street station of the Interborough 
Rapid Transit line located at intersection of West 72nd Street and 
Broadway, New York, NY''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40225-40226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17419]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-24-2018]

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 293--Limon, Colorado; Authorization of 
Production Activity Laser Galicia America LLC (Bending and Assembly of 
Trafo Wall); Aurora, Colorado

    On April 6, 2018, the Town of Limon, Colorado, grantee of FTZ 293, 
submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ 
Board on behalf of Laser Galicia America LLC, within FTZ 293, in 
Aurora, Colorado.

[[Page 40226]]

    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (83 FR 17143, April 18, 2018). On 
August 6, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: August 8, 2018.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17419 Filed 8-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     In connection with the Form 10-K of DeanHolding Company (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Barry A. Fromberg, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ BARRY A. FROMBERG      Barry A. Fromberg     *Executive Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer*
Date: March 30, 2004
Note: This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required bythe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated May 14, 1999 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in adam.com, Inc.'s
(formerly A.D.A.M. Software, Inc.) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 1999 and of our report dated February 28, 2000, except as to the
second paragraph of Note 17, which is as of March 30, 2000, relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in
adam.com, Inc.'s Transition Report on Form 10-K/A for the nine months ended
December 31, 1999. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
September 6, 2000
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2986

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for inflation adjustments to the income threshold amounts applicable in determining the

portion of social security benefits subject to tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. NADLER (for himself and Mrs. LOWEY) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

for inflation adjustments to the income threshold

amounts applicable in determining the portion of social

security benefits subject to tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) subsection (c) of section 86 of the Internal Reve4 nue Code of 1986, as amended by the Revenue Reconcili5 ation Act of 1993, is amended by adding at the end there6 of the following new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(3) INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS.—In the case of

8 any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after
2

•HR 2986 IH

1 1994, each dollar amount contained in the preceding

2 provisions of this subsection shall be increased by an

3 amount equal to—

4 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by

5 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter6 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar

7 year in which the taxable year begins, by sub8 stituting ‘calendar year 1993’ for ‘calendar year

9 1992’.

10 If any increase determined under the preceding sen11 tence is not a multiple of $50, such increase shall

12 be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $50.’’

13 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

14 apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1993.

Æ
# C_2013042EN.01000601.xml

| 14.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/6

---

Public holidays in 2013: EEA EFTA States and EEA institutions

2013/C 42/04

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway | EFTA Surveillance Authority | EFTA Court |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 January | X | X | X | | X |
| 2 January | | X | | X | X |
| 6 January | | X | | | |
| 2 February | | X | | | |
| 11 February | | | | | X |
| 12 February | | X | | | |
| 19 March | | X | | | |
| 28 March | X | | X | | X |
| 29 March | X | X | X | X | X |
| 31 March | X | X | X | X | X |
| 1 April | X | X | X | X | X |
| 25 April | X | | | | |
| 1 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 9 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 10 May | | | | X | X |
| 17 May | | | X | | |
| 20 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 30 May | | X | | | |
| 17 June | X | | | | |
| 24 June | | | | | X |
| 5 August | X | | | | |
| 15 August | | X | | | X |
| 2 September | | | | | X |
| 8 September | | X | | | |
| 1 November | | X | | X | X |
| 8 December | | X | | | |
| 24 December | | | | | X |
| 25 December | X | X | X | X | X |
| 26 December | X | X | X | X | X |
| 27 December | | | | | X |
| 30 December | | | | | X |
| 31 December | | X | | | X |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

EFTA Surveillance Authority

EFTA Court

1 January

X

X

X

X

2 January

X

X

X

6 January

X

2 February

X

11 February

X

12 February

X

19 March

X

28 March

X

X

X

29 March

X

X

X

X

X

31 March

X

X

X

X

X

1 April

X

X

X

X

X

25 April

X

1 May

X

X

X

X

X

9 May

X

X

X

X

X

10 May

X

X

17 May

X

20 May

X

X

X

X

X

30 May

X

17 June

X

24 June

X

5 August

X

15 August

X

X

2 September

X

8 September

X

1 November

X

X

X

8 December

X

24 December

X

25 December

X

X

X

X

X

26 December

X

X

X

X

X

27 December

X

30 December

X

31 December

X

X

---
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2037 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 96-hour 

physician certification requirement for inpatient critical access hospital 

services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2014 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

ENZI, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

BARRASSO, Mrs. FISCHER, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. JOHANNS, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. HOEVEN, and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove 

the 96-hour physician certification requirement for inpatient critical access hospital services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Critical Access Hos5 pital Relief Act of 2014’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2037 IS

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING MEDICARE 96-HOUR PHYSICIAN CER2 TIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR INPATIENT 

3 CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL SERVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1814(a) of the Social Se5 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (6), by adding ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in paragraph (7), at the end of subpara9 graph (D)(ii), by striking ‘‘and’’ and inserting a pe10 riod; and 

11 (3) by striking paragraph (8). 

12 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub13 section (a) shall apply with respect to items and services 

14 furnished on or after January 1, 2014. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Isaac M. Rothenberg, Plaintiff, *v.*Alexander Fields et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Orange County,

January 30, 1953.

*Scott & Hoyt*for defendants.

*Andrew S. Fraser*for plaintiff.

Bailey, J.

Motion for a change of venue from Kings to Ulster County upon the ground that the latter is the proper county. Cross motion by plaintiff to retain the venue in Kings County upon the ground that the convenience of witnesses will be served thereby.

*87Plaintiff contends in opposition to defendants’ motion that (1) the motion is improperly based upon the affidavit of the attorney (2) the demand for a change of venue was not timely served and (3) the action does not directly involve real property in Ulster County wherefore Ulster County is not the proper county.

The Judicial Council of the State of New York in its Seventh Annual Report recommended that rule 146 of the Rules of Civil Practice be amended to provide that the demand and motion for change of venue be made by the party instead of by the attorney. This recommendation was made “ in conformity with the usual practice * * * that these acts are to be performed by the party ” and was not intended to preclude an attorney from performing the acts on behalf of Ms client. As stated on page 297 of the report “ The attorney will still be able, however, to perform these acts on behalf of the party.” The rule was amended as recommended. Defendants’ attorney recites in his affidavit that he has records in his office pertaining to this case and is familiar with the proceedings therein. The general requirement that an affidavit be made by the party should not be pressed to a technical extreme where the attorney speaks with knowledge and is qualified to urge the issue wMch involves compliance with technical provisions of the law. *(Reed*v. *Smith,*122 App. Div. 795; *Weinman*v. *Weinman,*75 N. Y. S. 2d 880, 882.)

The demand for the change of venue was served *“*with the answer ” as required by rule 146 and accepted by plaintiff although not served within twenty days. The court will not prescribe a twenty-day period of limitation for service of this demand in the absence of a clear legislative expression to such effect.

Plaintiff is seeking a judgment herein wMch involves a change in the title to real estate and the action is therefore within the purview of section 183 of the Civil Practice Act and properly maintainable in Ulster County. *(Nassau Hotel Co.*v. *Barnett,*164 App. Div. 203; *Brunner*v. *Steinhardt,*111 N.Y.S. 2d 887.)

Plaintiff has failed to give the names and addresses of his proposed witnesses or to indicate the substance of their testimony and its materiality to the issues. The cross motion to retain the venue in Kings County must therefore be denied. *(McDermott*v. *McDermott,*267 App. Div. 171; *Sanders*v. *Prescott,*234 App. Div. 899.)

Motion granted. Cross motion denied. Submit order accordingly.
#### CITY OF BATON ROUGE v. Irving SMITH.

No. 61512.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Irving Smith, applying for writ of review and stay order. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied.
Order filed September 13, 2012. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-09-00364-CV

____________

GERARD STEPHAN LAZZARA, JR., Appellant

V.

JOYCE ANN LAZZARA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2007-14931

O R D E R

On May 21, 2009, this court abated this appeal because appellant petitioned for 

voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of 

Texas, under cause number 09-33361. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. 

Through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, the 

court has learned that the bankruptcy case was closed February 27, 2012. The parties 

failed to advise this court of the bankruptcy court action.
2

Unless within 20 days of the date of this order, any party to the appeal files a 

motion demonstrating good cause to retain this appeal, this appeal will be reinstated and 

dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Central National Bank of Yonkers, as Substituted and Successor Trustee under the Will of Stella A. Eagan, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County,

October 20, 1953.

*857*Arbuchle, Miles & Fitzgerald*for substituted and successor trustee, petitioner.

*Choate, Mitchell <& Ely*for Sherwood J. Andrus and another, respondents.

Griffiths, S.

The court determines that Marion Andrus Nichols, referred to by a daughter of testatrix as her “ foster child ” is not entitled to share in the remainder bequeathed to the “ lawful issue ” of such daughter of testatrix. It is undisputed that although a proceeding for adoption was instituted in 1918, the proposed order approving the adoption was not signed. Moreover, in a prior proceeding involving the lawfully adopted daughter of a son of testatrix, this court held that under another clause of the same will, identical in form with that requested to be construed herein, the term *“*lawful issue ” of such son did not include such adopted child. (See *Matter of Eagan,*110 N. Y. S. 2d 438.)

Nor is the adopted daughter of a son of testatrix entitled to share under the alternate provision whereby upon the death of such designated daughter without leaving lawful issue her surviving such remainder was given by testatrix “ to such of my children as shall survive her and the issue of any of my deceased children, per stirpes and not per capita ”. In the absence of a contrary intention the word ' ‘ issue ’ ’ is interpreted in its primary sense as referring to descendants and not to children by adoption. *(New York Life Ins. & Trust Co.*v. *Viele,*161 N. Y. 11.) There is no evidence of intention that the term *“*issue ” was here employed in any other sense. In *Matter of Upjohn*(304 N. Y. 366) the court construed the word “ issue ” to include a child known by the testator to have been adopted by his niece prior to the execution of the will. Here the adoption occurred not only subsequent to the date of the will but after the death of testatrix.

The will is construed accordingly and the remainder is determined to be distributable per stirpes equally among the lineal issue of testatrix surviving at the death of Estelle A. Nichols.

Settle decree accordingly.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this "Second Amendment") dated as of March 12, 2009 made by and among A.T. CROSS COMPANY, a Rhode Island corporation (the "Borrower"), A.T. CROSS LIMITED, a corporation organized under the laws of England and Wales ("Cross UK"), BANK OF AMERICA N.A., as Administrative Agent ("Agent") L/C Issuer and Lender, and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ("London Branch) ("UK Lender").

Background

The Borrower, Cross UK, the Agent and the UK Lender entered into a credit agreement dated as of March 24, 2008, which credit agreement was amended by first amendment to credit agreement dated March 24, 2008 (such credit agreement, as amended by such first amendment the "Original Credit Agreement").  The Borrower and Cross UK have requested that the Agent and the UK Lender, among other things, change the definition of Consolidated EBITDA to account for certain restructuring charges, change the Tangible Net Worth financial covenant with respect to the level and the frequency of the test, increase the permitted amount of stock repurchases and provide time for one of the Borrower's Subsidiaries to move its deposit accounts to the Agent.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the agreements, provisions and covenants herein contained, the Borrower, the Agent and the Lender hereby agree as follows:
Document

Exhibit 10.1




September 22, 2022
Torkel Rhenman
Houston, TX
Dear Torkel: 
I am pleased to confirm on behalf of LyondellBasell that your new role will be Executive Vice President, Advanced Polymer Solutions reporting directly to me. This change will be effective October 1, 2022.
Your annualized base salary, incentives (both STI and LTI), prior benefits and perquisites as well as share ownership guidelines remain unchanged.
You will continue to be eligible to participate in the amended and restated Executive Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”) in accordance with the terms of the Severance Plan and your applicable participation agreement.
Please read, sign, scan and return this letter to Michele Gest at [redacted] to indicate your acceptance as soon as possible.
Congratulations Torkel, I look forward to welcoming you on the Executive Committee as we work together to align our business strategy with execution towards our North Star.       


Sincerely, 


/s/ Peter Vanacker


Peter Vanacker
Chief Executive Officer


By signature, I acknowledge receipt of this letter and my intent to carry out the work that this new role will involve.
									
			
	/s/ Torkel Rhenman		September 27, 2022
	Signature		Date
			
	Torkel Rhenman
		
	Printed Name		
			










This does not change the existing terms and conditions of your current employment status. This letter is not a contract of employment for any specific or minimum term. Any prior oral or written representations to the contrary are void and our at-will relationship may not be modified except by a formal written employment contract signed by the senior officer for Human Resources at Lyondell Chemical Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3048 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3048

                     For the relief of Vivian Eney.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 1993

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Vivian Eney.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIM.

    Notwithstanding section 3 of House Resolution 449, adopted June 2, 
1971, as enacted by chapter IV of the Supplemental Appropriations Act 
of 1972 (40 U.S.C. 206b(e)), the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, 
out of money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of 
$17,230.53 to Vivian Eney, widow of Christopher Eney. This sum 
represents the value of the compensatory time off Christopher Eney 
accrued for duty as a member of the Capitol Police before his death. 
Payment of this sum shall fully satisfy any claim Vivian Eney has 
against the United States for the value of the compensatory time off 
accrued by Christopher Eney for duty as a member of the Capitol Police.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FEES.

    No amount exceeding 10 percent of the payment made under section 1 
shall be paid to or received by any agent or attorney in consideration 
for services rendered in connection with the payment. Any person who 
violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be 
subject to a fine in the amount provided under section 3571 of title 
18, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EIP MICROWAVE, INC.                                             1996 FORM 10-KSB
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(i)

                                 AMENDMENT TO
                             EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "AMENDMENT") is made as of
November 20, 1996 by and between EIP Microwave, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("COMPANY"), and John F. Bishop ("EMPLOYEE").

     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee are parties to an Employment Agreement
dated as of October 1, 1995 (the "EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT"), and desire to amend
the Employment Agreement pursuant to the provisions of this Amendment.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the provisions hereinafter set forth,
the parties agree as follows:

     1.   Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

          (a)  SALARY.  Company shall pay Employee a salary of Six Thousand Five
     Hundred Dollars ($6,500) per month, which salary shall be payable in
     advance on the first day of each calendar month during the Term, PROVIDED
     that such salary shall be reduced to Three Thousand Two Hundred Fifty
     Dollars ($3,250) per month during the period from January 1, 1997 until
     the Transition Date.

     2.   Except as expressly amended pursuant to this Amendment, the terms of
the Employment Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date first written above.

COMPANY:                      EIP MICROWAVE, INC.,
                               a Delaware corporation



                              By: /s/  Robert D. Johnson    
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                   Robert D. Johnson
                                   Authorized Representative


EMPLOYEE:                         /s/  John F. Bishop        
                              ----------------------------------------
                              John F. Bishop




                                      60
#### Willie Lee ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-934.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.