alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted February 11, 2019 *

Decided February 11, 2019

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

AMY C. BARRETT, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER, Circuit Judge

No. 17

‐ 3561

J AMES EDWARD GRANT,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant

,

v

.

J EFFREY GILL,

Defendant

‐ Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

No. 14

‐ cv

‐ 436

‐ jdp

J ames D. Peterson,

Chief Judge

.

O R D E R

James Grant, a former Wisconsin inmate, appeals from a jury verdict against him

on claims that correctional officer Jeffrey Gill used excessive force on him during an

escort and retaliated against him after he chose to defend himself at a prison

‐ disciplinary hearing. Because Grant did not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence

before the district court or provide us with a trial transcript, we dismiss Grant’s appeal.

* We have agreed to decide this case without oral argument because the briefs

and record adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and oral argument would

not significantly aid the court. F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 34(a)(2)(C). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited onl y in accordance with Fed. R. A pp

. P. 32.1No. 17

‐ 3561 Page 2

This case concerns the use of force during an escort. After Grant disobeyed

instructions on the way to a prison disciplinary hearing, Gill pushed him into a wall.

Other guards helped Gill restrain Grant and then strip

‐ searched him. Grant sued all the

officers involved but the only claims that eventually proceeded to trial were his

excessive

‐ force and retaliation claims against Gill. The jury returned a verdict in Gill’s

favor on both counts. At no time did Grant file a motion for judgment as a matter of law

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50.

On appeal, Grant asserts that a rational and unbiased jury would have returned a

verdict in his favor because his evidence is “clear and convincing.” But Grant did not

move for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50 before or after the jury’s verdict, so

we are “‘powerless’ to review the sufficiency of the evidence after trial.” Ortiz v. Jordan

,

562 U.S. 180, 189 (2011) (quoting Unitherm Food Sys., Inc. v. Swift

‐ Eckrich, Inc.

, 546 U.S.

394, 400–02 (2006)); Haze v. Kubicek

, 880 F.3d 946, 950 (7th Cir. 2018). What’s more, Grant

has not supplied us with transcripts of the trial proceedings, as he must if he wished to

raise a sufficiency

‐ of

‐ the

‐ evidence challenge. F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 10(b)(2); see Morisch

v. United States

, 653 F.3d 522, 529 (7th Cir. 2011).

We therefore DISMISS the appeal.
# C_2013030EN.01000402.xml

| 1.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6738 — Goldman Sachs/KKR/QMH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 30/03

On 19 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6738. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6738. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,483-02

EX PARTE ANDRE OSAGIE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 16642B IN THE 21 DISTRICT COURT

ST

FROM WASHINGTON COUNTY

ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion.

CONCURRING OPINION

Ijoin this Court’s remand order because I agreewith its observation that applicant has alleged

facts that “if true, might entitle him to relief.” Because applicant has pleaded a colorable

ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, Iwould orderthe habeas court on remand to appoint counsel

for him upon request if he is indigent, regardless of whether the trial court holds a hearing. See Ex

partePointer, 492 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (per curiam) (Alcala, J., concurring).

At a minimum, however, in addition to the order’s current admonition that the appointment of

counsel is mandatory for an indigent applicant upon request if the habeas court holds a hearing, I

would include a further admonishment that an indigent applicant is “entitled” to the appointment of

counsel upon request “if the court concludes that the interests of justice require representation.” See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ART. 1.051(d). 

Filed: October 5, 2016

Do Not Publish
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1




                                  VERITY, INC.

                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  AUGUST 31,
                                                                1996       1997
                                                              -------    ------
Primary and Fully Diluted:
  Weighted average common shares 
   outstanding for the period..............................    10,744    11,033
                                                             --------  --------
Shares used in per share calculation.......................    10,744    11,033
                                                             --------  --------
Net loss applicable to common stockholders ................  $ (1,283) $ (9,766)
                                                             ========  ========
Net loss per share ........................................  $  (0.12) $  (0.89)
                                                             ========  =========
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C .

Agreement s Adopte d byth e Traffi c Conference s of th e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n OST-2011- . 0< D { 3

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

B Y TH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR TASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNIZE D DOCKETOSl-X,^' ^ - 0 0 > 2 > ACTFON DAT

E3 ^' ^ ^ ' ' Thi s approval andgran t

o f antitrus t immunity i s subject , wher e applicable , t o condition s previousl y imposed . Thi s actio n i s effectiv e after 7 day s unles s apetitio n i s file dunde r 14 CF RJ85.3 0 o r

arevie w i s undertake n o n th e Department' s ow n motion . I n view o l th e agreement' s noncontroversia l natur e an dth e availability o f th e abov e niacedure , th e 21-day Miiodi n UkCFR303.4 2 i s waived .



### 2 5 Januar

y201 1 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Intemationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 K.St.N.W . #12 * Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATION
I, Amy Vidrine Samson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period endedMarch 28, 2004 of Crown Crafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and;  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that was materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 16, 2004     /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson   Amy Vidrine Samson Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
# C_2013023EN.01000901.xml

| 25.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 January 2013

2013/C 23/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3349 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,73 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4620 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84390 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6879 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2417 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4135 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,597 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 294,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6985 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1909 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3685 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3661 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2737 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3374 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3497 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5881 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6393 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 426,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,0664 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3069 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5743 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 847,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0682 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,205 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2012 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,780 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7171 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9385 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,7580 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3349

JPY

Japanese yen

119,73

DKK

Danish krone

7,4620

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84390

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6879

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2417

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4135

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,597

HUF

Hungarian forint

294,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6985

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1909

RON

Romanian leu

4,3685

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3661

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2737

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3374

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3497

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5881

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6393

KRW

South Korean won

1 426,70

ZAR

South African rand

12,0664

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3069

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5743

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 847,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0682

PHP

Philippine peso

54,205

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2012

THB

Thai baht

39,780

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7171

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9385

INR

Indian rupee

71,7580

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2013118EN.01000101.xml

| 25.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6879 — Mitsui Group/Gestamp Automoción/Target Companies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 118/01

On 17 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6879. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6879. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### NEAL LUMBER AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc., and Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Troy Lee McMILLAN, Sr., Harry E. Casion, Harry M. Casion, Rex Lumber Company, Continental National American Group and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 36363.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 15, 1968.

J. Donelson Jones, for petitioners.

Steve M. Watkins of Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, for Troy Lee McMillan, Sr.

John D. Buchanan, Jr. of Moore, Henderson, Buchanan & Moore, Tallahassee, for Harry E. Casion and Harry M. Casion.

Ernest W. Welch of Isler & Welch, Panama City, for Rex Lumber Co.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 7, 1967.

After oral argument and upon consideration of the petition, the briefs and the record, we conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Respondents is granted in the sum of $350.00.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Negotiated Rulemaking for Distribution Transformers

Medium- and Low-Voltage Working Group Meeting Schedule

October 12-14, 2011

Working Group Date and Time Address

Medium-Voltage

October 12; 9:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m.

October 13; 9:00 a.m. – 12:00p.m.

National Rural Electric Cooperative 

Association

4301 Wilson Blvd.

Arlington, VA 22203

Low-Voltage October 13; 1:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

October 14; 9:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m.

National Rural Electric Cooperative 

Association

4301 Wilson Blvd.

Arlington, VA 22203

November 8-9, 2011

Working Group Date and Time Address

Medium-Voltage November 8; 9:00 a.m. – 6:00p.m.

Edison Electric Institute

701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004-2696

Low-Voltage November 9; 9:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m.

950 L’Enfant Plaza

Washington, DC 20024

Room: ?

November 30 – December 2, 2011

Working Group Date and Time Address

Medium-Voltage November 30; 9:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m.

December 1; 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.

American Public Power Association

1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 1200, 

Washington, DC 20009-5715

Low-Voltage December 1; 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.

American Public Power Association

1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 1200, 

Washington, DC 20009-5715

Low-Voltage December 2; 9:00 a.m. – 3:30 

DOE, Forrestall Building

1000 Independence Ave, SW

Washington, DC 20585

Room: 8E-089
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          92,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         58,809
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,130
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,115
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    592
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       592
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39


</TABLE>
# C_2013313EN.01000201.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/2

---

Election of the President of the General Court

2013/C 313/02

On 16 September 2013, the Judges of the General Court, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of the Rules of Procedure, elected Mr Marc Jaeger President of the General Court for the period from 16 September 2013 to 31 August 2016.

---
#### SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Joseph PASCIUTA and American Can Company, a corporation, Appellees.

No. 69-368.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 14, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2013130EN.01000102.xml

| 7.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6722 — FrieslandCampina/Zijerveld & Veldhuyzen and Den Hollander)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 130/02

On 12 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6722. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6722. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Charles Robert CAPLINGER, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41610.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 4, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. 251 So.2d 297.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Luftrarsa Cargo AG Frankfurt F lughafen, Tor 21, 60546 Frankfurt sm Main Federal Aviation Administration Regulatory Dockets Orville Wright Building (FOB-10A) 800 IndependenceAvenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 USA lhre Ze1chen Your Ref. 

# rgo Networking theworld.

Unsere Ze1chen /Oaturr Our Ref./Date February 23, 2017 Tel./Fax Phone/Fax E-Mail Email +49 69 696-55818 +49 69 696 55830



### Time-limited Exemption from 14CFR 91.227 (c)(1)(i) and (iii)- Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) Out Equipment Performance Requirements
Reference: Grant of Exemption Number 12555, regulatory docket No

. FAA
-2015-0971
Grant of Exemption No. 12555 provides for a time-limited grant of exemption from the ADS-B Navigation Integrity Category (NIC) and Navigation Accuracy Category for position (NACp) requirements of 14 CFR section 91.227(c)(1)(i) and (iii) from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2024. Lufthansa Cargo AG, Frankfurt Flughafen, Tor21, Gebaude 322, 60546 Frankfurt/Main, Germany herby notifies the FAAthat we intend to comply with the conditions and limitations expressed in the exemption cited above. Lufthansa Cargo AG, Captain DirkVogel Nominated Person Flight OPS Lufthansa Cargo

Gesellschaftsrechtllche Angaben, Anschrift und weitere lnformationen auf der Ruckseite. For corporate details, address and further information please turn over.Lufthansa Cargo AG Frankfurt Flughafen, Tor 21 Gebiiude 322 60546 Frankfurt am Main Mitglied der lATA/Member of lATA www.lufthansa-cargo.com Deutsche Bank AG BIC Code: DEUTDEFFXXX IBAN DE17 5007 0010 0202 6029 00 US!
-ID
-Nr. DE 811 163 245 Sitz der Gesellschaft/Corporate Headquarters: Frankfurt am Main Registereintragung/Registration: Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main HRB 90085 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/ Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Harry Hohmeister Vorstand/Executive Board: Peter Gerber (Vorsitzender/Chairman) Dr. Alexis von Hoensbroech Dr. Martin Schmitt Si:iren Stark I ••**'t?': ~~** **~I**