**SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST** (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51
- App. V) SIP Submitted by : West Virginia Department of Environment al Protection Date Submitted: August 7, 2013 Subject: West Virginia’s Redesignation R equest and Mainten ance Plan for the Martinsburg
- Hagerstown , WV
- MD 1997

Annual Fine Particulate Matter ( PM 2.5 ) Nonattainment Area Completeness Review Completed by : Rose Quinto Date Completed: September 18 , 2013 **Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE** 

**EPA REQUIREMENT STA**  **TE SUBMITTAL (X)**  1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 1. Submittal l etter dated August 5, 2013 from West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Secretary R andy C. Huffman, to Shawn M
. Garvin, Regional Admin i strator , EPA Region 3
. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall inc lude the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 2. Not applicable. Not a regulatory change
- the submittal is a request for redesignation, a maintenance plan, and 2 007 b ase ye ar inventory

approval
. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. The West Virginia ’s plan states that it has the necessary legal authority and necessary

resources to enforc e its rules or permit provisions on which the plan is based. X2

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, whe re applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whe never possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4. Not applicable , see 2 above. X

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuanc e of the plan. 5. N ot applicable. X
6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. A n otice of public hearing and a public comment period was published in the West V irginia Reg ister , the Charleston Gazette and the Martinsburg Journal on June 1 4, 2013
. X
7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. A transcript of the public hearing showed the public hearing was held in accordance with the public notice. X
8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 8. Appendix G of the State submitta l includes a copy of the comments received and the response to comments
. X3

**Technical Materials**

**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL** 
1. I dentification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Section 3 of the Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan show that nitrogen oxide (NOx ) , sulfur dioxide ( SO 2 ) , PM 2.5 , volatile organic compound ( VOC ) and ammonia (NH 3 ) are the pollutants affected by the plan. X

2. I dentification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Martinsburg
- Hagerstown, WV
- MD PM 2.5 nonattainment area comprising Berkeley County in West Virginia. X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the dif ferences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 3. Detailed information on the point, area , nonroad and mobile source emissions estimates used in the request for redesignation, the PM 2.5 maintenan ce plan, and the 2007 base ye ar emissions inventory

for the Martinsburg
- Hagerstown Area is provided in the submittal. X

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments , reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility , as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. West Virginia has developed a base year (2007 ) and projected (2015 and 2025 ) emissions inventories showing continued att ainment of the PM 2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) during the plan period
. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorolog ical data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analy sis. 5. Not applicable. X4

6. Evidence, where necessary , that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology
. 6. Not applicable. X 7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary , to ensure em ission levels. 7. Based on permanent and enforceable measures, West Virginia has projected emissions inventories for int erim year 2015 and out year 2025 to demonstrate maint enance throughout the entire 10
- ye ar period. X
8. Compliance/enforcement s trategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8 . I dentified c ontingency measures will be implemented if the Area violates or exceeds the PM 2.5 standard. These measures are intended to bring the area back to attainment of the standard
. X
9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (I f a policy is not appropriate, explain why .) 9. N ot applicable.
10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrat ing maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. A Maintenance Plan was submitted to EPA Region I II on August 5, 2013 . This plan demonstrates maintenance for 20 15 through 202 5
. X