alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013021EN.01000901.xml

| 24.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 January 2013

2013/C 21/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3330 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4629 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84070 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6909 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2385 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4015 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,597 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 294,57 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6979 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1638 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3755 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3591 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2635 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3222 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3351 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5827 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6347 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 421,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,9650 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2891 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5790 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 832,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0569 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,201 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2314 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,710 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7205 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8538 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,4590 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3330

JPY

Japanese yen

117,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4629

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84070

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6909

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2385

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4015

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,597

HUF

Hungarian forint

294,57

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6979

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1638

RON

Romanian leu

4,3755

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3591

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2635

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3222

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3351

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5827

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6347

KRW

South Korean won

1 421,90

ZAR

South African rand

11,9650

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2891

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5790

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 832,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0569

PHP

Philippine peso

54,201

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2314

THB

Thai baht

39,710

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7205

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8538

INR

Indian rupee

71,4590

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### In re ESTATE of Nellie E. RASEY, Deceased.

Nos. 2537, 69-162.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 14, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 16, 1970.

John W. Douglass, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants Syracuse University, Father Flanagan’s Boys’ Home, Children’s Home Society of Florida, Methodist Home for Children and Folts Home.

Robert P. Kelley, and Edwin O. Simon, of Redfearn & Simon, Miami, and G. H. Martin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees G. H. Martin and Mary Bogey, as Administrators of the Estate of Helen M. Rasey, deceased.

REED, Judge.

The appellants have filed an appeal from orders of the county judge for Broward County, Florida, striking their respective petitions filed in 1968 in the Estate of Nellie E. Rasey, deceased. By their petitions the appellants sought an order confirming in them an interest under the will of Nellie E. Rasey, deceased, in her estate.

Nellie E. Rasey died 16 April 1950 a resident of Florida. Her will was admitted to probate in the County Judge’s Court for Broward County, Florida, on 29 April 1950. On 7 May 1956, the county judge entered an order in the estate holding that the bequests to the appellants under the will of Nellie E. Rasey were invalid under F.S.1951, Section 731.19, F.S.A. This order was appealed to the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida, and affirmed on 4 October 1957. Certiorari was denied by the Florida District Court of Appeal for the Second District. See In re Estate of Rasey (Syracuse University v. Fox et al), Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 83.

When the 1968 petitions were filed by the appellants, the law of the case before the county judge was that the bequests to the appellants under the will of Nellie E. Rasey were invalid under F.S.1951, Section 731.19, F.S.A. This point of law became established as the law of the case when the earlier order of the county judge was affirmed by the circuit court in its appellate capacity and left undisturbed by the District Court of Appeal for the Second District. Once the law of the case was thus established, the trial judge was bound by it throughout the remainder of the cause. Kittel v. Kittel, Fla.1967, 210 So.2d 1; Walker v. Atlantic Coastline Railroad Company, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 713, 715. As we understand the appellants’ petitions, any relief that could have *648been granted thereunder would of necessity have been inconsistent with the prior order of the county judge holding the bequests to appellants invalid; therefore, the county judge in our opinion had no alternative except to strike or otherwise dismiss the petitions.

Affirmed.

OWEN, J., concurs.

WALDEN, J., concurs in conclusion only.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Employment & Occupations Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.72 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, OCT. 11, 2012 "The Employment Situation" Live on C-SPAN's "America by the Numbers" Did you know that the unemployment rate decreased to 7.8 percent in September 2012 and payroll employment rose by 114,000? To find out more and better understand the employment data and trends, tune in to "America by the Numbers" on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" on Friday, Oct. 12, 2012, at approximately 9 a.m. EDT. Thomas Nardone, Associate Commissioner for Employment and Unemployment Statistics at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, discusses the employment findings. Each Friday, C-SPAN's "America by the Numbers" segment features information from the federal statistical system. The program highlights the trends and allows the public to call in or email their views. More information on previous C-SPAN programs is available at  <https://www.census.gov/newsroom/cspan.html>. **No news release associated with this product. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3064 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3064

  To amend section 43 of title 18, United States Code, to extend its 
       protection to individuals who work in animal enterprises.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 1993

  Mr. Gekas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 43 of title 18, United States Code, to extend its 
       protection to individuals who work in animal enterprises.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 43(a) of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(2) travels in interstate or foreign commerce, or uses or 
        causes to be used the mail or any facility in interstate or 
        foreign commerce, for the purpose of causing physical harm to 
        another person or to the property of another person in order--
                    ``(A) to prevent that person from participating in 
                an animal enterprise; or
                    ``(B) to retaliate against that person for 
                participating in an animal enterprise;'';
            (2) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(1)'';
            (3) by striking ``(2)'' and inserting ``(B)''; and
            (4) by inserting ``or'' after ``conspires to do so;''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Samuel M. EDELSTEIN and Margaret Edelstein, his wife, et al., Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-849.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 24, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
novn-ex104_451.htm



 

Exhibit 10.4

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED, RESTATED AND CONSOLIDATED LICENSE AGREEMENT

This second amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Amended, Restated and Consolidated License Agreement dated June 27th, 2012 by and between The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (“University”) and Novan, Inc. (“Licensee”), as amended by the First Amendment to Amended, Restated and Consolidated License Agreement dated November 30, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”), is effective as of April 12, 2016.

WHEREAS, the parties now wish to amend the Agreement to update Appendix A of the Agreement to include the Improvement known as [***] as a University Invention and;

WHEREAS, the parties agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of the Agreement, as amended herein;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
The following Improvement is deemed to be included in the University Inventions, and all patents and/or patent applications claiming such Improvement are deemed to be included in the Patent Rights for all purposes under the Agreement, including but not limited to the license granted to Licensee and Its Affiliates pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Agreement:





	
 
	
•
	
[***]





	
 
	
2.
	
Appendix A of the Agreement is hereby deleted in the entirety and replaced with the attached Appendix A.





	
 
	
3.
	
Capitalized terms used herein have the same meaning as was given them in the Agreement.





	
 
	
4.
	
Other than as amended herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.





	
 
	
5.
	
This Second Amendment may be executed by one or more of the parties to this Second Amendment on any number of separate counterparts (including by facsimile transmission or PDF signature), and all of said counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.




[Signatures appear on following page]

 

 

 

[***]  Confidential treatment requested pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Commission.



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment to the Agreement, as indicated below.

 


	
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH

CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
	
 
	
NOVAN INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
/s/ Jacqueline Quay
	
 
	
/s/ Emily K. Hales

	
Jacqueline Quay
	
 
	
Name: Emily K. Hales

	
Director of Licensing, 

Office of Commercialization 

and Economic Development
	
 
	
Title: Corporate Counsel

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
4/22/16
	
 
	
5/6/16

	
Date
	
 
	
Date

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
INVENTORS
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
/s/ Mark Schoenfisch
	
 
	
 

	
Mark Schoenfisch
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
/s/ Robert Soto
	
 
	
 

	
Robert Soto 
	
 
	
 




 

 

 

2



 

APPENDIX A 

Patent Rights

University Invention

[***]

[***]  Confidential treatment requested pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Commission.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30154 14-DEC-2010 11:10 AM NO. SCWC-30154 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. A’OPOHAKUKU RODENHURST, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30154; CASE NO. 1DTC-09-062844) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Duffy, J., for the court 1 ) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant A’oPohakuku Rodenhurst’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on November 16, 2010, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, December 14, 2010. FOR THE COURT: /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. Associate Justice A’oPohakuku Rodenhurstpetitioner/defendantappellant pro se on the application Delanie D. Prescott-Tate, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney,for respondent/plaintiffappellee on the response

1 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ. and Circuit Judge To ' oto ' o, assigned by reason of vacancy.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES (de), INC. 

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO 2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

The 2009 Stock Incentive Plan of Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc., pursuant to Section 11(d) thereof, is hereby amended as follows:

 Section 7(b), which currently reads as follows: 

“(b) Terms and Conditions for All Restricted Stock Awards. The Board shall determine the terms and conditions
of a Restricted Stock Award, including the conditions for vesting and repurchase (or forfeiture) and the issue price, if any.” 
 is
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Section 7(b): 
 “(b) Terms and Conditions
for All Restricted Stock Awards. The Board shall determine the terms and conditions of a Restricted Stock Award, including the conditions for vesting and repurchase (or forfeiture) and the issue price, if any; provided, however, that the minimum
vesting period of any Restricted Stock Award made on or after November 17, 2016 shall be at least one year.” 
 The following
new Section 10(i) and Section 10(j) are hereby inserted at the end of Section 10: 
 “(i) Minimum
One-Year Vesting. The terms and conditions of any Award made or granted on or after November 17, 2016 shall provide that no part of such Award shall vest or become exercisable prior to the first anniversary of the date such Award is made or
granted, except that an Award may provide that it shall immediately vest or become immediately exercisable, in whole or in part, upon a Participant’s death, disability, termination from employment by the Company other than for Cause, or upon
the occurrence of a Change in Control Event.” 
 “(j) CEO Grants and Minimum Holding Period. Any Award made
or granted on or after November 17, 2016 to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer shall (i) have a vesting schedule of more than four years, and (ii) be subject to an additional one year holding period before any sale or transfer
of shares that shall have vested may take place, other than as provided for in Section 10(e) relative to the sale of shares to cover minimum statutory tax obligations in respect of the vesting of such shares.”
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (i) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Anthony J. Merante                                                          |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Anthony                  J. Merante                                                              |
|   | President,                  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial                  Officer |

----

** **
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
REGINALD LENARD SMITH, individually and as a class representative, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., Defendants - Appellants. No. 12-56690D.C. No. 2:11-cv-10666-GAFPJW
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted August 7, 2014 Pasadena, California Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Sheriff Lee Baca appeals the district c ourt’s denial of qualified immunity on his motion for judgment on the pleadings in this putative class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Reginald Smith a lleges that he has twice been wrongfully arrested on a Los Angeles County Superior Court felony warrant issued for another 

# FILED
AUG 29 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.person with a similar name and physical characteristics, resulting in his incarceration and the denial of his passport application. Smith claims that the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department’s refu sal to update its warrant database with readily available biometric informati on about warrant subjects and exonerees violates his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The only issue before us is whether Baca is entitled to qualified immunity regarding Smith’s Fourteenth Amendment claim based upon alleged violations of his right to international travel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse. The district court erred in concluding that the law was clearly established so as to put a reasonable official in Baca’s position on notice that his alleged conduct deprived Smith of the right to internati onal travel without due process of law. See Ford v. City of Yakima , 706 F.3d 1188, 1195 (9th Cir. 2013) (per curiam); see also Green v. City & Cnty. of S.F. , 751 F.3d 1039, 1052 (9th Cir. 2014) (requiring clarity in “the law governing the conduct at issue”). Although the right to international travel is clearly established in general, see Eunique v. Powell , 302 F.3d 971 (9th Cir. 2002), no law clearly establishes that a state official’s actions leading to the State Department’s discre tionary denial of a passport application may effect a deprivation of the right. See 22 C.F.R. § 51.60(b)(9).

2We decline to decide whether Smith has adequately pleaded a Fourteenth Amendment violation. See Pearson v. Callahan , 555 U.S. 223, 236 (2009). We also decline to address the Fourth Amendm ent issues discussed by the parties. We conclude only that Sheriff Baca is entitled to qualified immunity because the law governing Smith’s right to travel claim is not clearly established. Sheriff Baca’s motion for judicial notice is DENIED AS MOOT
. REVERSED AND REMANDED
.

3
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2868 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2868

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 16 (legislative date, November 2), 1993

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 600 Camp Street in New 
     Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``John Minor Wisdom United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 600 Camp Street in New Orleans, 
Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ``John Minor Wisdom 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Minor Wisdom 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mandeep K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mandeep K. Taneja                
|Mandeep K. Taneja                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|December 15, 2006
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2881

To transfer a portion of Fort Sheridan, Illinois, to the Department of

Veterans Affairs for use as a National Cemetery.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1993

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Veterans’ Affairs and Armed Services

A BILL

To transfer a portion of Fort Sheridan, Illinois, to the

Department of Veterans Affairs for use as a National

Cemetery.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAND TRANSFER, FORT SHERIDAN, ILLINOIS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall

5 transfer, without consideration, to the Secretary of Veter6 ans Affairs a parcel of real property consisting of approxi7 mately 200 acres of real property, including improvements

8 thereon, that is located at Fort Sheridan, Illinois, and ap9 propriate for use as a national cemetery. The Secretary

10 of Veterans Affairs may reduce the number of acres to
2

•HR 2881 IH

1 be conveyed if the Secretary determines that the acreage

2 required for a national cemetery is less than 200 acres.

3 (b) USE OF PROPERTY.—The Secretary of Veterans

4 Affairs shall use property conveyed pursuant to subsection

5 (a) as a national cemetery under chapter 24 of title 38,

6 United States Code.

7 (c) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact

8 acreage and legal description of the real property to be

9 conveyed under this section shall be determined by a sur10 vey that is satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.

Æ