alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The VILLAGE BY THE SEA, INC., The Village By The Sea Condominium Apartments, Sections A and B, Inc., and Leonard A. Versluis, Trustee, Successor Trustee to William P. Doyle, Trustee, Appellants, v. ROCAILLE CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 2344.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
'«iUI:R

P.O:

AUSTIN,

BOX 12308,' CAPITOL STATION

TEXAS 78711

tf«fc£$ LLiSi

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE

RE: WR-80,826-02

QUIRINO MACHIN SANCHEZ

MOORE (MTC) - TDC #1665404

.^P\

=3* PIT

02-1M . '. $ 

0004279596 JA

MAILED FROM ZIP C
Exhibit 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Parking Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the Quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onAugust 9, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Emanuel Eads, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.              /s/ JEFF HEAVRIN   Jeff Heavrin   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer        A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TOCENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TOTHE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing. This certification is executed as of August 9, 2006.
1The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 01-1200WA

_____________

Shirley Syrus, *

*

Appellant, * On Appeal from the United

* States District Court

v. * for the Western District

* of Arkansas.

Harborview Mercy Psychiatric *

Hospital, * [Not To Be Published]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 11, 2001

 Filed: July 26, 2001

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Shirley Syrus appeals the District Court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment

in her race, disability, and religious discrimination case against Harborview Mercy

Psychiatric Hospital, her former employer. Syrus was terminated after she violated her

employer’s policies several times during her ninety-day probationary period. 
-2-

We agree with the District Court that Ms. Syrus’s claims of religious and

disability discrimination were barred because she failed to exhaust her administrative

remedies as to both claims. See Williams v. Little Rock Mun. Water Works, 21 F.3d

218, 222-23 (8th Cir. 1994) (prior to filing federal lawsuit, Title VII plaintiff must

exhaust administrative remedies by filing timely EEOC charge and receiving notice of

right to sue; plaintiff will be deemed to have exhausted administrative remedies as to

allegations that are like or reasonably related to substance of charge). As to the race

discrimination claim, which was administratively exhausted, we see nothing in the

record tending to show that Harborview’s legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for

terminating Ms. Syrus was pretextual. Thus, the District Court properly rejected this

claim on its merits. See Rose-Maston v. NME Hosps., Inc., 133 F.3d 1104, 1108-09

(8th Cir. 1998). The Court also did not abuse its discretion in refusing to appoint

counsel. See Stevens v. Redwing, 146 F.3d 538, 546 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of

review; relevant factors).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I,  Alan E. Wiley,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report on Form 10-K of Eye Care Centers of
     America,  Inc.;

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any untrue
     statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make  the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this  report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
          supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which  this  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of  the  period  covered  by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          fourth  fiscal  quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely  to  materially  affect, the registrant's internal control over
          financial  reporting.

5.   The  registrant's  other  certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the  registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  function):

     a)   all  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting which are
          reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the registrant's ability to
          record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information;

     b)   any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees  who  have  a  significant role in the registrant's internal
          control  over  financial  reporting.

Date:  March  24,  2004
/S/  Alan E. Wiley
-----------------------
Alan E. Wiley
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### GREAT DANE TRAILERS, INC., a corporation, Appellant, v. Robert W. JEFFERS, Appellee.

No. Q-311.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 6, 1973.

Steven A. Werber, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Edna L. Caruso, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Economic Surveys
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.17 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, MARCH 29, 2012 Information and Communication Technology Survey These statistics, based on the 2007 North American Industry Classification System, estimate capitalized and noncapitalized spending in 2010 for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) equipment and computer software at the sector level, as well as for three-digit and selected four-digit industries. Rapid advances in ICT equipment result in these assets having short useful lives and being replaced at a much faster rate than other types of equipment. As a result, rather than capitalizing the value of such assets and expensing the cost over two or more years, companies often expense the full cost of such assets during the current annual period. In some cases this same-period expense is also because companies have varying dollar levels for capitalization. Hence, the survey gives users a more complete idea of U.S. companies' total investment in ICT equipment. The statistics are used to assess future productivity and economic growth prospects and permit the reconciliation of important differences between reported production and consumption of technology. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/econ/ict/xls/2010/full_report.html> **No news release associated with this product. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2012270EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 September 2012

2012/C 270/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2638 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4514 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79360 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5026 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2049 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3725 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,703 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 285,44 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1594 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4828 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2951 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2341 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2470 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8028 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5830 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5743 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 432,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5615 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0177 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4450 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 093,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9381 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,845 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6844 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,468 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5756 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5162 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,3490 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2638

JPY

Japanese yen

99,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4514

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79360

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5026

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2049

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3725

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,703

HUF

Hungarian forint

285,44

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1594

RON

Romanian leu

4,4828

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2951

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2341

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2470

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8028

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5830

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5743

KRW

South Korean won

1 432,57

ZAR

South African rand

10,5615

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0177

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4450

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 093,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9381

PHP

Philippine peso

52,845

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6844

THB

Thai baht

39,468

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5756

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5162

INR

Indian rupee

70,3490

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Michael TAYLOR, Appellant, v. TOOL & DIE SUPPLY COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 70-761.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 14, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2013089EN.01000102.xml

| 27.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6829 — Investindustrial/Aston Martin)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 89/02

On 20 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6829. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6829. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 23.1



                      CONSENT AND REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of ProBusiness Services, Inc. of our report dated August 1, 2000
included in the 2000 Annual Report to Stockholders of ProBusiness Services,
Inc.

         Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of
ProBusiness Services, Inc. listed in Item 14(a)(2). This schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

                                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Walnut Creek, California
September 27, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         324,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,474,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (58,500)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,404,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,174,694
<PP&E>                                       1,758,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,715,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,810,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,745
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,513,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,715,100
<SALES>                                      2,368,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,745,119
<CGS>                                        6,182,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,182,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                229,546
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            229,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   229,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
No. 11025.

#### Myers, Trustee, *v.*Samuels et al.

Decided December 21, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey; Mr. Amos Burt Thompson*and *Messrs. White, Johnson, McCaslin & Cannon,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Allan T. Brinsmade; Mr. Aaron Hahn*and *Mr. Herman Preusser,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2013313EN.01000601.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/6 |
| ---------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Composition of the Chambers and attachment of the Judges to Chambers

2013/C 313/11

By decision of 30 November 2005,( 1 ) the Tribunal decided to sit in three Chambers and as a full Court. By decision of 8 October 2013, for the period from 8 October 2013 to 30 September 2014, the Tribunal attached the Judges to the Chambers as follows:

| | First Chamber
H. KREPPEL, President of Chamber, E. PERILLO and R. BARENTS, Judges, | | H. KREPPEL, President of Chamber, | | E. PERILLO and R. BARENTS, Judges, |
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | --------------------------------- | | ---------------------------------- |
| | H. KREPPEL, President of Chamber, | | | | |
| | E. PERILLO and R. BARENTS, Judges, | | | | |

| | Second Chamber
M.I. ROFES I PUJOL, President of Chamber, K. BRADLEY and J. SVENNINGSEN, Judges, | | M.I. ROFES I PUJOL, President of Chamber, | | K. BRADLEY and J. SVENNINGSEN, Judges, |
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | ----------------------------------------- | | -------------------------------------- |
| | M.I. ROFES I PUJOL, President of Chamber, | | | | |
| | K. BRADLEY and J. SVENNINGSEN, Judges, | | | | |

| | Third Chamber, sitting with three Judges
S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH, President of the Tribunal, E. PERILLO, R. BARENTS, K. BRADLEY and J. SVENNINGSEN, Judges. | | S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH, President of the Tribunal, | | E. PERILLO, R. BARENTS, K. BRADLEY and J. SVENNINGSEN, Judges. |
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ---------------------------------------------- | | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
| | S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH, President of the Tribunal, | | | | |
| | E. PERILLO, R. BARENTS, K. BRADLEY and J. SVENNINGSEN, Judges. | | | | |

In the Third Chamber, the President will sit, alternately, either with Judges E. Perillo and J. Svenningsen or with Judges R. Barents and K. Bradley, subject always to connections between cases.

---

( 1 )  OJ 2005 C 322, p. 16.

---
May 29, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHARLES ALLEN DONELLY, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00429-CR

NO. 14-12-00432-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2013118EN.01000201.xml

| 25.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6753 — Orkla/Rieber & Son)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 118/03

On 4 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vodavi  Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, David A. Husband, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m(a) or
          78o(d)); and

     (4)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ David A. Husband
--------------------------------
David A. Husband
Chief Financial Officer
April 29, 2003