alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2992

To designate certain units of the National Park System as the Manhattan

National Historical Park, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To designate certain units of the National Park System

as the Manhattan National Historical Park, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MANHATTAN NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the Man5 hattan National Historical Park (hereafter in this Act re6 ferred to as the ‘‘park’’).

7 (b) UNITS OF PARK.—The park shall be comprised

8 of the following units: Castle Clinton National Monument,

9 Federal Hall National Memorial, Theodore Roosevelt

10 Birthplace National Historic Site, General Grant National
2

•HR 2992 IH

1 Memorial, Hamilton Grange National Memorial, Saint

2 Paul’s Church National Historic Site, and the head3 quarters facility located at 26 Wall Street, Manhattan.

4 SEC. 2. ADMINISTRATION OF MANHATTAN NATIONAL HIS5 TORICAL PARK.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Each of the units of the park shall

7 be administered in accordance with this Act, with the pro8 visions of law which established the respective unit, and

9 with the provisions of law generally applicable to units of

10 the national park system, including the Act entitled ‘‘An

11 Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other

12 purposes’’, approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16

13 U.S.C. 1, 2, 3, and 4) and the Act of August 21, 1935

14 (49 Stat. 666; 16 U.S.C. 461–467).

15 (b) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—(1) The Secretary

16 of the Interior is authorized to enter into cooperative

17 agreements with the city of New York, the State of New

18 York (or political subdivisions thereof), or any private or19 ganization to mark, interpret, maintain, restore, or pro20 vide technical assistance for the preservation, interpreta21 tion, and maintenance of any property, or portions there22 of, located within the units of the park.

23 (2) In administering the park, the Secretary is au24 thorized to enter into cooperative agreements with the

25 State of New York, or any political subdivision thereof,
3

•HR 2992 IH

1 for the rendering, on a reimbursable basis, of rescue, fire2 fighting, and law enforcement services and cooperative as3 sistance by nearby law enforcement and fire preventive

4 agencies.

5 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

6 There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as

7 may be necessary to carry out this Act, subject to the limi8 tation on amounts authorized to be appropriated for devel9 opment at Hamilton Grange National Memorial specified

10 in section 5 of the Joint Resolution of April 27, 1962,

11 as amended by Public Law 100–701 (102 Stat. 4641).

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1301

CARLOS EDWARD MARTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

TASHIANA ANITA MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEON LOTT, as Representative for the Office of the Richmond 

County Sheriff’s Department; DEPUTY BEN FIELDS, in his 

individual capacity as deputy with the Richland County 

Sheriff’s Department; DEPUTY JOSEPH CLARK, in his individual 

capacity as deputy with the Richland County Sheriff’s 

Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (3:07-cv-03782-JFA)

Submitted: December 30, 2010 Decided: January 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Carlos Edward Martin, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, 

II, Robert David Garfield, Kristy Markay Grafton, Andrew 

Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Edward Martin appeals the district court’s 

order granting summary judgment in part to defendants on his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Lott, No. 3:07-

cv-03782-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Securities and Exchange Commission  
450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20549 
 
 
 
               Re: Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. and Subsidiaries 
               Quarterly Report on Form 10Q 
 
 
 
We are aware that our report dated October 28, 1998 on our  
review of interim financial information of Pharmacia &  
Upjohn, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the three and nine month  
periods ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 and included in  
the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  
then ended is incorporated by reference in the Company's  
prospectus on Form S-8 Registration Statement (No. 033- 
63903) and the prospectus on Form S-8 Registration Statement  
(No. 333-03109).  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the  
Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered  
a part of the registration statements prepared or certified  
by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. 
 
 
 
 
Chicago, Illinois 
November 12, 1998
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Mandeep K. Taneja, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, and Cani I.Shuman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                                                                                                        |   |               |                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|--------------------|
| /s/ Mandeep K. Taneja                                                                                                                                  |   |     | /s/ Cani I. Shuman |
|   Mandeep K. Taneja President (Principal Executive Officer)August 14, 2002  Cani I. Shuman Chief Financial Officer August 14, 2002 |
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.67 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, MARCH 7, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to California http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  and http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html. 

Please visit http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/ for an interactive map showcasing county-level population change from 1960 to 2010, as well as state-level data on race and Hispanic or Latino origin for 2010. The widget will be updated as states are released and can be embedded on your website.

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
EXHIBIT 99.1


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


     I, John L. Larsen, the Chief Executive Officer of Crested Corp., certify
that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2002
accompanying this statement, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Crested Corp.

                                         /s/  John L. Larsen
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John L. Larsen, Chief Executive Officer

                                       Date:  September 11, 2002


<PAGE>





              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


     I, Robert Scott Lorimer, the Chief Financial Officer of Crested Corp.,
certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31,
2002 accompanying this statement, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Crested Corp.

                                         /s/  Robert Scott Lorimer
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Scott Lorimer,
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       Date:  September 11, 2002
#### G & B OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., d/b/a the Harem, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF BEVERAGE, Respondent.

No. DD-444.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 17, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 6, 1978.

Harry Katz, Jr. of Katz & Katz, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Charles F. Tunnicliff, Dennis E. LaRosa, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case, though involving a different establishment and different individuals, to G & B of Jacksonville, Inc., d/b/a Out Of Sight v. State of Florida, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage, Case No. DD—443, Opinion filed August 17, 1978. All of the points involved in this case, except the point relating to sufficiency of the evidence, are identical to points presented in, and resolved by, said companion case. As to sufficiency of the evidence, a review of the record reveals it to have been conflicting and contradictory. Under those circumstances it was the prerogative of the hearing officer, in the first instance, to resolve the conflicts and make findings of fact. He did. Those findings were adopted by the agency. We may not reweigh the evidence nor substitute our opinions for those of the hearing officer and agency on conflicting testimony. The record reveals substantial competent evidence, apparently believed by the hearing officer, to support his findings. They will not be disturbed by us.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 3.2
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           CURTICE-BURNS FOODS, INC.

               Under Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law

     The  undersigned,   being  respectively  the  President  and  Secretary  of
CURTICE-BURNS FOODS, INC. (the "Corporation"), hereby certify:

     1. The name of the Corporation is CURTICE-BURNS  FOODS, INC. The name under
which it was formed is CURTICE-BURNS, INC.

     2. The Certificate of Incorporation was filed by the Department of State on
January 16, 1961.

     3. The Certificate of  Incorporation,  as now in full force and effect,  is
hereby  amended to effect the  following  change as authorized by Section 801 of
the Business Corporation Law:


               To change the name of the Corporation from  CURTICE-BURNS  FOODS,
          INC. to AGRILINK  FOODS,  INC.  The  Paragraph  designated  "1" in the
          Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety
          as follows:


               1. The name of the corporation is AGRILINK FOODS, INC.


     4. This  Amendment to the  Certificate of  Incorporation  was authorized by
vote of the Board of Directors  followed by vote of the holders of a majority of
all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon at a meeting of Shareholders.
<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  we have signed this Certificate of Amendment this
12th day of September, 1997 and hereby affirm the truth of the statements
contained herein under penalty of perjury.




/s/ Dennis M. Mullen, President
    ---------------------------




/S/ William D. Rice, Secretary
    --------------------------
# C_2013237EN.01000201.xml

| 15.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 August 2013

2013/C 237/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3243 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4583 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6393 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2415 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8130 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,822 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,62 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7025 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2037 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4315 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5664 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4524 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3689 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2705 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6501 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6835 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 482,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2129 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1041 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5415 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 667,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3351 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,975 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,8995 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,504 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0586 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8756 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,3700 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3243

JPY

Japanese yen

130,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4583

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85440

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6393

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2415

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8130

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,822

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,62

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7025

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2037

RON

Romanian leu

4,4315

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5664

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4524

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3689

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2705

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6501

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6835

KRW

South Korean won

1 482,39

ZAR

South African rand

13,2129

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1041

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5415

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 667,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3351

PHP

Philippine peso

57,975

RUB

Russian rouble

43,8995

THB

Thai baht

41,504

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0586

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8756

INR

Indian rupee

81,3700

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# D ^ .I ^^^3DIN6IPI^LI^ CO^TY^1111 7 16^'S O^^C^

Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency Headquarters Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Mail Code 1IOIA Washington, DC 20460

Re: South Carolina Petition for Reconsideration: 2008 Ozone NAAQS Designations

Dear Administrator Jackson:

On April 30, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated the eastern part of York County, South Carolina "nonattainment" for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The EPA included this portion of York County in the Charlotte-Gastonia-Salisbury, NC-SC (Charlotte) nonattainment area based on their belief that this part of York County contributed to the ozone violations in Charlotte.

After consultation with the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) along with other private stakeholders and public jurisdictions in the area, York County believes this determination was rushed and made without adequate time to fully consider DHECs submissions, that the EPA provided insufficient consultation and detail in its Technical Support Documentation (TSD) to give us a clear understanding of the rationale used in making this decision, and, further, that there was an inconsistent application of scientific rationale. Consequently, the York County Council has authorized me to submit this letter of support; joining DHEC in their request that the EPA reconsider this decision in light of the Petition for Reconsideration referenced above as was submitted by DHEC to the EPA on July 20, 2Q12-

James E. Baker York County Manager

cc: Bill Harris, Chief, Catawba Indian Nation Randy Imler, Executive Director, Catawba Council of Governments Danny Funderburk, Mayor, Fort Mill, South Carolina George Sheppard, Mayor, Tega Cay, South Carolina Doug Echols, Mayor, Rock Hill, South Carolina Myra C. Reece, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality, DI-IEC

6 South Congress Street, Post Office Box 66, York, South Carolina 29745-0066 Telephone: (803) 684-8511 Fax: (803) 684-8550 Web: www.yorkcountygov.com
#### CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. Gene LONG, as Tax Assessor of Bradford County, Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. Q-269.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 1, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 3, 1973.

Edward McCarthy, Jr., of Freeman, Richardson, Watson, Slade & McCarthy, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Theron A. Yawn, Starke, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to Container Corporation of America v. Gene Long, etc., et al., 274 So.2d 571, in which an opinion of reversal has this day been filed. The judgment appealed herein is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings for the reasons and upon the authorities *576cited in the opinion rendered in the companion case mentioned above.

Reversed.

RAWLS, Acting' C. J., WIGGINTON, J., and POWELL, GILLIS E„ Associate Judge, concur.
# C_2012070EN.01000601.xml

| 8.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6509 — GE/KGAL/Extresol-2)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 70/02

On 1 March 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6509. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6509. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2013252EN.01000201.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/2

---

Taking of the oath by the new Member of the Court of Justice

2013/C 252/02

Following his appointment as Judge at the Court of Justice for the period from 1 July 2013 to 6 October 2015 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 1 July 2013, (1) Mr Rodin took the oath before the Court of Justice on 4 July 2013.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 184 of 3.7.2013, p. 6.

1

---
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 16, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00562-CV 

TERRY WILLS, Appellant 

V. 

1901 HARWOOD LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-01953-A 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Reichek 

Opinion by Justice Reichek 

After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, 

we ordered this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief 

to be filed by November 3, 2022. On November 7, 2022, we notified appellant the 

time for filing appellant’s brief had expired and directed appellant to file the brief 

within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the 

dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To 

date, appellant has not filed a brief or otherwise corresponded with the Court 

regarding the status of this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

220562F.P05 

 

/Amanda L. Reichek/

AMANDA L. REICHEK 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

TERRY WILLS, Appellant 

No. 05-22-00562-CV V. 

1901 HARWOOD LLC, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-01953-

A. 

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Reichek. Chief Justice Burns and 

Justice Molberg participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered December 16, 2022