alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER16-1341-000 and ER16-1341-001]


Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; Notice Affording the Parties an 
Opportunity To File Briefs

    1. On January 5, 2018, Xcel Energy Services Inc. filed with the 
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 
(D.C. Circuit) a petition for review of the Commission's orders in 
Southwest Power Pool, Inc., 156 FERC ] 61,020 (2016) and Southwest 
Power Pool, Inc., 161 FERC ] 61,144 (2017). On July 19, 2018, the 
Commission filed an unopposed motion for voluntary remand of the above-
captioned proceedings \1\ so that it may consider the implications of 
the D.C. Circuit's decision in Old Dominion Electric Cooperative v. 
FERC.\2\ In the Voluntary Remand Motion, the Commission stated that it 
``will permit the parties to file, within 30 days of the Court's order 
on this motion, supplemental pleadings on the significance of the Old 
Dominion decision (or on any matter of relevance).'' \3\ On July 31, 
2018, the D.C. Circuit granted the Voluntary Remand Motion.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Xcel Energy Serv. Inc. v. FERC, Unopposed Motion of 
Respondent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for Voluntary 
Remand, No. 18-1005 (filed July 19, 2018) (Voluntary Remand Motion).
    \2\ Old Dominion Elec. Coop. v. FERC, No. 16-1111, 2018 WL 
2993205 (D.C. Cir. 2018) (Old Dominion).
    \3\ Voluntary Remand Motion at 2.
    \4\ Xcel Energy Serv. Inc. v. FERC, No. 18-1005, Order (issued 
July 31, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Accordingly, the parties are hereby afforded the opportunity to 
file briefs with the Commission by August 31, 2018, addressing the 
significance to these proceedings of the Old Dominion decision or any 
other matter of relevance.

    Dated: August 6, 2018.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17355 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Document

Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO RAIL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO RAIL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), is entered into and effective as of the 16 day of August, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Green Plains Logistics LLC (the “Operator”) and Green Plains Trade Group LLC (the “Customer”). Customer and Operator are sometimes referred to in this Amendment as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party”.


WHEREAS, Operator wishes to amend the Rail Transportation Services Agreement effective July 1, 2015, as amended, between the Parties (the “Agreement”) on the terms and conditions set forth herein with terms used herein not defined herein having the meaning set forth in the Agreement;


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises of the Parties and covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the Parties hereto agree as follows:


1.Section 9 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following:


Term. The initial term, of this Agreement shall continue for a period until June 30, 2029 (the "Initial Term") and shall automatically renew for successive twelve (12) month terms thereafter (each such term, a "Renewal Term" and all Renewal Terms, together with the Initial Term, the "Term") until terminated by either party by providing 360 days written notice of such termination to the other party.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.








OPERATOR: GREEN PLAINS LOGISTICS LLC


Signature:      /s/ Michelle Mapes                                      
Name:    Michelle Mapes
Title:    Chief Legal & Administration Officer




CUSTOMER: GREEN PLAINS TRADE GROUP LLC  


Signature:     /s/ Michelle Mapes                                       
Name:    Michelle Mapes
Title:    Chief Legal & Administration Officer
















EXHIBIT E-4


Effective as of August 16, 2022
LOADING POINTS


O’Neill, Nebraska
Central City, Nebraska
Fairmont, Minnesota
Hopewell, Virginia
Madison, Illinois
Mount Vernon, Indiana
Obion, Tennessee
Otter Tail, Minnesota
Shenandoah, Iowa
Superior, Iowa
Wood River, Nebraska
York, Nebraska
# C_2013130EN.01000301.xml

| 7.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 May 2013

2013/C 130/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3107 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,18 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4528 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84310 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5543 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2280 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6240 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,693 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7001 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1515 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3135 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3543 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2801 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3217 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1705 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5380 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6144 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 435,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,7695 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0826 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5721 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 758,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9026 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,551 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,7400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,744 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6373 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,8424 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,9940 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3107

JPY

Japanese yen

130,18

DKK

Danish krone

7,4528

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84310

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5543

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2280

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6240

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,693

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7001

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1515

RON

Romanian leu

4,3135

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3543

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2801

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3217

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1705

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5380

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6144

KRW

South Korean won

1 435,42

ZAR

South African rand

11,7695

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0826

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5721

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 758,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9026

PHP

Philippine peso

53,551

RUB

Russian rouble

40,7400

THB

Thai baht

38,744

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6373

MXN

Mexican peso

15,8424

INR

Indian rupee

70,9940

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.11 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FEBRUARY 2, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to New Jersey https://www.census.gov/rdo/data http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age. These data will be presented for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  https://www.census.gov/rdo http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html Follow us on http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html and follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11(b)

                            Blue Wave Systems Inc.

                  Computation of Per Share Net Income (Loss)
                   (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               Six Months Ended
                                                                                                December 31,
                                                                                            1999              1998
                                                                                          --------          --------
<S>                                                                                       <C>              <C>
Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
 Net income (loss) applicable to common stock                                             $   870          $  (741)
                                                                                          =======          =======

 Weighted average shares outstanding                                                       14,020           13,021

Basic net income (loss) per share                                                         $  0.06          $ (0.06)
                                                                                          =======          =======

Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share:

 Weighted average shares outstanding                                                       14,020           13,021

 Effect of common stock equivalents:
  Options granted                                                                           1,056              N/A
  Weighted average exercised options and warrants outstanding for portion of
   period, net of equivalent shares purchased at average fair market value                    408              N/A
  Effect of using option proceeds to repurchase common stock at
   average fair market value                                                                 (316)             N/A
                                                                                          -------          -------
    Total common stock equivalents                                                          1,148                -
                                                                                          -------          -------
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding                                                15,168           13,021
                                                                                          -------          -------

Diluted net income (loss) per share                                                       $  0.06          $ (0.06)
                                                                                          =======          =======
</TABLE>
#### Angel SERRANO, Petitioner, v. DEAUVILLE HOTEL et al., Respondents.

No. 40192.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 19, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
# C_2012023EN.01001201.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 January 2012

2012/C 23/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3145 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 101,18 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4335 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83685 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8966 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2078 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6450 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,156 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 293,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6991 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2207 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3457 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3389 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2326 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3129 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1947 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5949 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6485 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 475,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2035 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2995 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5698 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 809,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9941 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,313 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,7400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,920 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2903 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0004 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,9300 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3145

JPY

Japanese yen

101,18

DKK

Danish krone

7,4335

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83685

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8966

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2078

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6450

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,156

HUF

Hungarian forint

293,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6991

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2207

RON

Romanian leu

4,3457

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3389

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2326

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3129

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1947

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5949

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6485

KRW

South Korean won

1 475,64

ZAR

South African rand

10,2035

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2995

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5698

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 809,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9941

PHP

Philippine peso

56,313

RUB

Russian rouble

39,7400

THB

Thai baht

40,920

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2903

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0004

INR

Indian rupee

64,9300

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2013283EN.01000201.xml

| 28.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 September 2013

2013/C 283/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3537 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4573 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84000 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6863 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2248 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1030 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,690 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7028 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2280 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4692 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7566 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4542 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3967 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4975 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6373 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6985 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 456,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,7160 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2827 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6153 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 334,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3692 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,651 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,8740 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,344 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0589 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8128 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,6030 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3537

JPY

Japanese yen

133,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4573

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84000

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6863

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2248

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1030

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,690

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7028

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2280

RON

Romanian leu

4,4692

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7566

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4542

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3967

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4975

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6373

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6985

KRW

South Korean won

1 456,70

ZAR

South African rand

13,7160

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2827

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6153

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 334,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3692

PHP

Philippine peso

58,651

RUB

Russian rouble

43,8740

THB

Thai baht

42,344

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0589

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8128

INR

Indian rupee

84,6030

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012150EN.01000102.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6470 — TE/Deutsch)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 150/02

On 2 April 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6470. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6470. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40415 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. JOHN R. NEWMAN, also known as Dick Newman and VIRGINIA L. NEWMAN, also know as Jenny Newman, Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-18-1

_________________________________________________________________ April 16, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John R. Newman and Virginia L. Newman appeal their convictions and sentences for bankruptcy fraud. The district court did not err by refusing to dismiss the indictment for an alleged misstatement of law made to the grand jury as the Newmans have not shown that they were prejudiced by the misstatement.
See Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States , 487 U.S. 250, 2542

(1988); United States. v. McKenzie , 678 F.2d 629, 634 (5th Cir. 1982). The district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding, as hearsay, testimony by James Moon regarding what the Newmans had told him of how they had determined the value of their jewelry. United States v. Liu , 960 F.2d 449, 452 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court did not commit clear error in determining the amount of loss under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b). United States v. Wimbish , 980 F.2d 312, 313 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Samuel W. Long et al., as Trustees under the Will of John A. Beeler, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County,

October 6, 1953.

*Joseph J. Marrin*for Dorothy B. Long.

*McLaughlin, Stickles <& Hayden*for trustees.

*William Schroeder*for Amanda. G. Beeler and others.

*Abraham I. Menin,*special guardian.

Gbiffiths, S."

In this accounting proceeding the trustees seek an allowance of real estate management commissions with respect to interests in certain oil leases on properties, most of which are situated in Texas.

Subdivision 7 of section 285-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act authorizes a single commission on the gross rents collected where the trustee ‘' is * * * entitled or required to collect the rents of and manage real property ”.

*798The trustees cite *Matter of Brennan*(251 N. Y. 39), as authority for the allowance of commissions for managing real properties. In *Matter of Brennan (supra,*p. 44), although by the terms of the lease the trustee was relieved from the management of the real property, the court allowed management commissions on rents collected since the " entire responsibility for directing, supervising, overseeing, administering and controlling the property ’ ’ rested upon the trustee. The court stated that the trustee could not lawfully evade such responsibility and its exercise constituted management within the intention of the statute. *Matter of Brennan*did not, however, involve management commissions with respect to royalties received under oil leases.

So far as appears, the trustees paid the real estate taxes on said oil properties in addition to collecting or receiving the royalties as they became due and payable. The account does not indicate that the trustees performed any other duties in connection with the management of such properties. The court is accordingly of the opinion that the duties performed by the trustees with respect to such oil leases did not constitute the collection of rents and the management of real property within the intendment of subdivision 7 of section 285-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act.

Any additional compensation to the trustees by way of management commissions is accordingly disallowed.

Settle decree accordingly.
## VIRGINIA:

**In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court B**  **uilding in the**

**City of Richmond on Thursday**  **the 1st**  **day of July,**  **20 21** 

**.**

Present: All the Justices

Endalkachew Merid

, Appellant,

against Record No. 20 0799

C ourt of Appeals No. 1145

- 19

- 4

Commonwealth of Virginia

, Appellee.

Upon an appeal from a judgment

rendered by the Court of Appeals of

Virginia

.

In this case, we awarded Endalkachew Merid an appeal from the judgment of the Court

of Appeals, which affirmed his convictions for first degree murder and abduction by force

. See

Merid v. Commonwealth

, 72 Va. App. 104

, 119 (20 20 ).

We have considered the record, briefs, and arguments of counsel, and for the reasons

stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment. *

This order shall be published in the Virginia Reports and certified to the C ourt of Appeals

of Virginia and the Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria.

A Copy,

Teste:

Douglas B. Robelen, Clerk

By:

Deputy Clerk

* The Supreme Court of the United States decided Caniglia v. Strom

, 593 U.S. ___, 141

S. Ct. 1596 (2021), after the Court heard oral argument in this case. The Court finds that the

judgment of the Court of Appeals is consistent with Caniglia

.
#### Mac Ray WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-396.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### J. S. DAVIS, Appellant, v. Emma RICHTER et al., Appellees.

No. 2437.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.