Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39683 

13This rate was calculated as discussed in 

footnote 11, above. 

14See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

15See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of 

Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 80 FR 75056, 75057 (December 1, 

2015). 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Dongkuk Steel Mill ...................... 16.58 

EEW Korea Co, Ltd .................... 16.58 

HISTEEL Co., Ltd ....................... 16.58 

Husteel Co., Ltd .......................... 16.58 

Keonwood Metals Co., Ltd ......... 16.58 

Kolon Global Corp ...................... 16.58 

Korea Cast Iron Pipe Ind. Co., 

Ltd ........................................... 16.58 

Miju Steel MFG Co., Ltd ............. 16.58 

MSTEEL Co., Ltd ....................... 16.58 

NEXTEEL Co., Ltd ..................... 16.58 

Poongsan Valinox (Valtimet Division) ........................................ 16.58 

POSCO ....................................... 16.58 

Sam Kang M&T Co., Ltd ............ 16.58 

Sin Sung Metal Co., Ltd ............. 16.58 

Soon-Hong Trading Company .... 16.58 

Steel Flower Co., Ltd .................. 16.58 

TGS Pipe .................................... 16.58 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

amended final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where Hyundai Steel and SeAH 

reported the entered value of their U.S. 

sales, we calculated importer-specific 

ad valorem duty assessment rates based 

on the ratio of the total amount of 

dumping calculated for the examined 

sales to the total entered value of the 

sales for which entered value was 

reported. Where Hyundai Steel did not 

report entered value, we calculated the 

entered value in order to calculate the 

assessment rate. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

average 13 of the cash deposit rates 

calculated for Hyundai Steel and SeAH. 

The amended final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the amended 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable.14

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP for Hyundai Steel, 

SeAH, and the companies subject to the 

review-specific average rate 15 days 

after publication of these amended final 

results of this administrative review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective 

retroactively for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after July 18, 2018, 

the date of publication date of the Final 

Results, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for each specific company 

listed above will be that established in 

the final results of this review, except if 

the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for previously investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit will continue 

to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the company participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent segment for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 4.38 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.15 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

These amended final results and 

notice are issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(h) and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e). 

Dated: August 6, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17164 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–863] 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products From India: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2016–2017 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that certain corrosion-resistant steel 

products (CORE) from India are being, 

or are likely to be sold, at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR), January 4, 2016, through 

June 30, 2017. We invite interested 

parties to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rachel Greenberg or Kabir Archuletta, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0652 or 

(202) 482–2593, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
39684 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 

1See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China, 

the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India 

and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 

48390 (July 25, 2016) (Order). 

2 Id. at 48393. 

3See Memorandum for The Record from 

Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, performing the nonexclusive functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 

‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal 

Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), dated 

January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of 

the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated March 12, 2018. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Corrosion-Resistant 

Steel Products from India; 2016–2017,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CORE from 

India in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).1 The review covers 

one producer/exporter of the subject 

merchandise, JSW Steel Ltd. and JSW 

Steel Coated Products Limited 

(collectively, JSW). During the 

investigation, Commerce found JSW to 

be a single entity and, because there 

were no changes to the facts that 

supported that determination, we 

continue to find that these companies 

are a part of a single entity for this 

administrative review.2 Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

Commerce exercised its discretion to 

toll all deadlines affected by the closure 

of the Federal Government from January 

20 through 22, 2018.3 On March 12, 

2018, Commerce postponed the 

preliminary results of this review until 

August 3, 2018.4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are CORE from India. For a full 

description of the scope, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

dated concurrently with and hereby 

adopted by this notice.5

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

topics included in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is included at 

the Appendix to this notice. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is made available 

to the public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov, and it is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

available at http://enforcement.trade.

gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum and the 

electronic version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that, for 

the period of January 4, 2016, through 

June 30, 2017, the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

JSW Steel Ltd./JSW Coated 

Products Limited ..................... 15.33 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties within five days 

after public announcement of the 

preliminary results. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c), interested parties may 

submit case briefs not later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed 

not later than five days after the date for 

filing case briefs. Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue, (2) a brief summary of the 

argument, and (3) a table of authorities. 

Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed 

using ACCESS. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic 

records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time within 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

those raised in the respective case 

briefs. Commerce intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of the issues raised in any 

written briefs, not later than 120 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. If JSW’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in 

the final results of this review, we will 

calculate an importer-specific ad 

valorem antidumping duty assessment 

rate based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

importer’s examined sales to the total 

entered value of those same sales in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review when the 

importer-specific assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review is not zero or de minimis. If 

JSW’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. The final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by this review 

where applicable. 

In accordance with Commerce’s 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by JSW for which it 

did not know that the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at 

the all-others rate if there is no rate for 

the intermediate company(ies) involved 

in the transaction. We intend to issue 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of administrative review for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for JSW will be 

the rate established in the final results 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39685 

6See Order. 

1See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and 

Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy, 61 FR 

38547 (July 24, 1996) (AD Order). 2See the ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Pasta from Italy; 

2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently and hereby 

adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

of this administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this 

administrative review but covered in a 

prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 0.00 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the investigation.6 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and 

increase the subsequent assessment of 

the antidumping duties by the amount 

of the antidumping duties 

reimbursement. 

The preliminary results of review are 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the 

Act and sections 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1) 

and 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: August 3, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

A. Comparisons to Normal Value 

1. Determination of the Comparison 

Method 

2. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

V. Date of Sale 

VI. Product Comparisons 

VII. Export Price 

VIII. Normal Value 

A. Home Market Viability as Comparison 

Market 

B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test 

C. Level of Trade 

D. Cost of Production 

1. Calculation of COP 

2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 

3. Results of the COP Test 

E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Comparison Market Prices 

IX. Currency Conversion 

X. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–17160 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–818] 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2016–2017 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. (previously known as 

Ghigi lndustria Agroalimentare Srl) 

(Ghigi) and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (Pasta 

Zara) (collectively Ghigi/Zara) made 

sales of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR) and that Industria 

Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco) did 

not. We invite interested parties to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Applicable August 10, 

2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy 

Zhang or George McMahon, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1168 or (202) 482–1167, 

respectively. 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain pasta 

(pasta) from Italy. The period of review 

(POR) is July 1, 2016, through June 30, 

2017. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the 

Order 1 is certain pasta from Italy and is 

currently classifiable under items 

1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to the order is dispositive. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.2

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). Constructed export price or export 

price is calculated in accordance with 

section 772 of the Act. Normal value is 

calculated in accordance with section 

773 of the Act. For a full description of 

the methodology underlying our 

preliminary results, see Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, Room B–8024 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision memorandum can 

be accessed directly at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

A list of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as an Appendix to this notice. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

calculated a weighted-average dumping 

margin of 5.97 percent for Ghigi/Zara 

and a de minimis margin for Indalco for 

the period July 1, 2016, through June 30, 

2017. Therefore, in accordance with 

section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we 

assigned the weighted-average dumping 

margin of 5.97 percent calculated for 

Ghigi/Zara to the seven non-selected 

companies in these preliminary results, 

as referenced below. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES