alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Continuation of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Colombia

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2291-4), I hereby certify, with respect to Colombia, that: (1) interdiction of aircraft reasonably suspected to be primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in that country's airspace is necessary, because of the extraordinary threat posed by illicit drug trafficking to the national security of that country; and (2) Colombia has appropriate procedures in place to protect against innocent loss of life in the air and on the ground in connection with such interdiction, which includes effective means to identify and warn an aircraft before the use of force is directed against the aircraft.

                        The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                         *Federal Register*                         and to notify the Congress of this determination.                    

[FR Doc. 2018-17261

Billing code 4710-10-P
#### GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Randall Charles WHEELUS, a minor, by his father and next friend, Charles Raymond Wheelus, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-184.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Paul H. Lee, Jr., of Gurney Gurney & Handley, Orlando, for appellant.

Marion R. Shepard and John McNatt, Jr. of Mathews Osborne & Ehrlich, Jacksonville, and Cleveland & Mize, Sanford, for appellee Florida Coca-Cola.

Philip H. Blackburn of Billings, Frederick & Wooten, Orlando, for other appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of a review of the briefs, the record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in dismissing appellant’s claim of lien without notice inasmuch as it clearly appears that the appellant was never a party to these proceedings. We further conclude that appellant’s notice of lien was a nullity of no force and effect. Blue Cross of Florida, Inc. v. O’Donnell, Fla.App. 1970, 230 So.2d 706.

Accordingly, the final order dismissing appellant’s notice of lien is affirmed, without prejudice to the appellant to pursue its subrogation rights as provided by law (see International Sales-Rentals Leasing Co., etc., et al. v. Nearhoof, Fla.1972, 263 So.2d 569); the final judgment of dismissal stands modified to such extent.

Affirmed, as modified.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A2 11 2 . ROSA MI NER v . W I LLI E LATI MORE.

Th i s cas e b eg an as a di s p o s s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Fo l l o wi n g

an ad v ers e ru l in g , d efen d an t Ro s a M i n er ap p eal ed t o t h e s u p eri or co u rt , wh i ch al s o

ru l ed in fav o r o f t h e p l ai n ti ff. M i n er t h en fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal

. W e l ack
ju ri s d i ct i o n fo r t w o reas on s

. Fi rs t

, “ ap p eal s fro m d eci s i o n s o f th e s u p eri o r co u rt s rev i ewi n g d eci s i o n s o f

l o wer co u rt s b y cert i o rari or d e n o v o p ro ceed i n g s s h al l b e b y ap p li cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

. ” (Pu n ct u at i o n o m i t t ed

. ) Bu ll o ck v. S a n d

, 2 6 0 Ga. Ap p

. 8 7 4,

8 7 5 (5 8 1 SE2 d 3 3 3 ) (2 0 0 3 ); s ee al s o OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ). Becau s e M i n er d i d n ot

fo l l o w t he p ro p er p ro ced u re fo r re q u e s t i n g ap p el l at e rev i ew i n t h i s cas e, we l ack
ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is ap p eal

. Seco n d

, t h i s ap p eal i s u n t i m el y

. Al t h ou g h a n o ti ce o f ap p eal g en eral ly m ay b e

fi led w i t hi n 3 0 d ay s o f e n t r y o f t h e o rd er so u gh t t o b e ap peal ed

, ap p eal s fro m ju d g m en t s i n di s po s ses s o ry act i o n s m u s t b e f i l e d wi t h i n 7 d ay s o f t he d at e t h e ju d g m en t was en tered

. See OCGA § 4 4 -7 -5 6 ; Ra d i o S an d y S p r i ng s
, In c. v. Al l en

Ro a d Jo i n t Ven t u r e , 3 11 Ga. Ap p

. 3 3 4

, 3 35 -3 36 (7 1 5 SE2 d 7 5 2 ) (2 0 1 1). M i n er,

h o wev er, fi l ed t h e n o ti ce o f ap p eal in t h i s cas e 21 d ay s aft er t h e s u peri o r co u rt ’ s o rd er

was en t ered

. Fo r t h es e reas o n s , t h i s ap p eal i s h e r e b y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f
ju ri s d i ct i o n

. July 21, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 07/21/2015
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Economic Surveys
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.03 **Contact:**
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, FEB. 8, 2011 2009 Annual Capital Expenditures Survey https://www.census.gov/econ/aces/xls/2009/full_report.html **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00048

- CR

The STATE of Texas, Appellant

v.

Christopher Glen ADAMS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR120324 Honorable Spencer W. Brown, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this matter is ABATED and

REMANDED to the trial court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 44.4. This court’s Corrected Order, dated

Novem ber 4, 2013, and the submission date set therein, is hereby WITHDRAWN.

We further direct the Honorable Spencer W

. Brown, judge of the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas, to execute more specific findings of fact and conclusions of law, consistent with this opinion, as required by Cullen and Elias

. Specifically, the trial court must make “findings of fact with g reater specificity,” and any related conclusions of law, as to the following:

(1) the impact of the injuries sustained by Mr. Rice and the blood on his face and whether any such injuries supported Trooper Salaz’s probable cause to arrest Adams for driving whi le intoxicated;

(2) the extent of Trooper Salaz’s conversation with Adams, prior to Adams being transported back to the scene of the accident, wherein Adams admitted he was the driver of the vehicle and that he had been drinking, and

whether such conversation supported a custodial arrest or an investigatory detention; and

(3) whether Trooper Salaz ’s transporting Adams from the accident scene to the fire station was part of an investigatory detention, what transpired at the fire station, what factors were utilized in Trooper Salaz’s decision to arrest04

- 13

- 00048

- CR

Adams for driving while intoxicated, and whether such informati on amounted to probable cause to arrest Adams for driving while intoxicated.

We also direct the trial court to file its findings and conclusions with the clerk of this court, via a supplemental clerk’s record, on or before July 25, 2014 . Upon filing of t he supplemental clerk’s record containing the finding s and conclusions, the appeal will be reinstated and a new

submission date will be set.

SIGNED June 25, 2014.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

- 2

-
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Monroe J. Carell, Jr., certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Central Parking
Corporation;

 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 9, 2005                  By: /S/ Monroe J. Carell, Jr.
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Monroe J. Carell, Jr.
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# RECEIVED MAR -1 

# 2012 

# HEARING DOCKET

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

Federal Aviation Administration Complainant


### v. Continental Airlines Inc. Respondent FAA Docket CP11SWOOOO FDMS No. FAA-2011-0775 Judge Richard C. Goodwin

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT The Administrator and Respondent have entered into an agreementto settle the above styled matter; therefore the Administratorwithdraws his complaint. Respectfully submitted, David 

### L. Donnell Southwest Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration

# By:~~ Tim Duff Attorney (817) 222-5099 (817) 222-5945fax tim.duff@faa.gov
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-50655 Summary Calendar

_____________________________________ In the Matter of: T. ROBERT SHUGRUE,

Debtor
T. ROBERT SHUGRUE, Appellant,

VERSUS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(95-CV-191)

______________________________________________________ March 1, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Appellant's arguments on appeal have no colorable merit.

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. Double costs are awarded in favor of appellee and against appellant.

DISMISSED.
# C_2011292EN.01000101.xml

| 5.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 October 2011

2011/C 292/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3181 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 101,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4426 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85650 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1628 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2169 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,908 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4069 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3270 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5056 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3984 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3923 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2623 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7573 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7358 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 577,55 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9663 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3858 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5070 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 732,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2196 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,063 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,3350 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,125 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5024 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4850 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,1240 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3181

JPY

Japanese yen

101,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4426

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85650

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1628

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2169

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,908

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4069

RON

Romanian leu

4,3270

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5056

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3984

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3923

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2623

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7573

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7358

KRW

South Korean won

1 577,55

ZAR

South African rand

10,9663

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3858

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5070

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 732,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2196

PHP

Philippine peso

58,063

RUB

Russian rouble

43,3350

THB

Thai baht

41,125

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5024

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4850

INR

Indian rupee

65,1240

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 12





American General Finance, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges







|Years Ended December 31,                           |             |             |             |             |            
|-------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ----------- | ----------- | ----------- | -----------
|(dollars in thousands)                             | 2005        | 2004        | 2003        | 2002        | 2001       
|Earnings:
Income before provision
for income taxes | $   820,317 | $   693,671 | $   575,408 | $   492,168 | $   356,518
|Interest expense                                   | 884,971     | 636,304     | 546,716     | 559,291     | 635,483    
|Implicit interest in rents                         | 19,314      | 18,040      | 17,913      | 17,160      | 16,464     
|Total earnings                                     | $1,724,602  | $1,348,015  | $1,140,037  | $1,068,619  | $1,008,465 
|Fixed charges:
Interest expense                    | $   884,971 | $   636,304 | $   546,716 | $   559,291 | $   635,483
|Implicit interest in rents                         | 19,314      | 18,040      | 17,913      | 17,160      | 16,464     
|Total fixed charges                                | $   904,285 | $   654,344 | $   564,629 | $   576,451 | $   651,947
|Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges                 | 1.91        | 2.06        | 2.02        | 1.85        | 1.55       





118
#### Marion Lamar SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-526.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 13, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2014

No. 04-14-00850-CV

IN RE Dr. Nancy T. POBLENZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On December 8, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency 

motion for temporary relief pending a ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has considered 

the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary 

relief are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on December 9th, 2014.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of December, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-20890, styled Daniel Coindreau, Individually and Andrea 

Fernandez, Individually and as Next Friend of C. C., A Minor v. CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation 

d/b/a CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Hospital, pending in the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the 

Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3016 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3016

  To provide that individuals shall not be required to repay certain 
          overpayments of emergency unemployment compensation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 1993

  Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Fingerhut, Ms. Furse, Mr. 
Kopetski, Mr. Stokes, Mr. Sawyer, and Mr. Brown of Ohio) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that individuals shall not be required to repay certain 
          overpayments of emergency unemployment compensation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That if an individual 
received any emergency unemployment compensation to which such 
individual was not entitled and such individual would have been 
entitled to such compensation under section 102(b)(2)(B) of the 
Unemployment Compensation Amendments of 1992 had the subsequent benefit 
year referred to in clause (ii) of such section 102(b)(2)(B) not 
expired or terminated--
            (1) on and after the date of the enactment of this Act, no 
        repayment of such compensation (and no notice of an overpayment 
        by reason of the receipt of such compensation) shall be 
        required under section 105 of the Emergency Unemployment 
        Compensation Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-164, as amended), and
            (2) any amount heretofore recovered with respect to such 
        compensation shall be returned.
The preceding sentence shall only apply with respect to compensation 
paid for weeks beginning after July 3, 1992, and before March 7, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CFC International,  Inc.
and  subsidiaries  (the "Company") for the quarter period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I Dennis W. Lakomy,  Executive Vice  President,  and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



     /s/                                          Dennis W. Lakomy
     --------------------------------------------------------------
     Name:        Dennis W. Lakomy
     Title:       Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer
     Date:        July 29, 2003

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided by CFC International,  Inc., and will be retained by CFC International,
Inc.  and  furnished to the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
#### Willie WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-498.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Theodore McCORMICK, a/k/a Teddy McCormick, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 66-1106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 25, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.