alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

COURIER CORPORATION
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Registrant
has the following subsidiaries:

|Name                                             |  | Immediate Parent                                 |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation |  | % Owned
by Immediate
Parent |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | -
|Book-mart Press, Inc.                            |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | New Jersey                    |  | 100                         | %
|Courier New Media, Inc.                          |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | Massachusetts                 |  | 100                         | %
|Courier Companies, Inc.                          |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | Massachusetts                 |  | 100                         | %
|Courier Custom Publishing, Inc.                  |  | Courier New Media, Inc.                          |  | Massachusetts                 |  | 100                         | %
|Courier Kendallville, Inc.                       |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | Indiana                       |  | 100                         | %
|Courier Properties, Inc.                         |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | Massachusetts                 |  | 100                         | %
|Dover Bookstore, Inc.                            |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | New York                      |  | 100                         | %
|Dover Publications, Inc.                         |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | New York                      |  | 100                         | %
|Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | National Publishing Company                      |  | Massachusetts                 |  | 100                         | %
|National Publishing Company                      |  | Courier Corporation                              |  | Pennsylvania                  |  | 100                         | %
|Courier Foreign Sales Corporation Ltd.           |  | National Publishing Company                      |  | Jamaica                       |  | 99                          | %

---

QuickLinks
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
#### The SEASONS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. The CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-632.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 19, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2013205EN.01000101.xml

| 19.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6887 — Snam/GICSI/TIGF)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 205/01

On 12 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6887. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6887. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6335

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus ROBERT WILLIAM PUCKETT, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-98-12; CA-99-161-7-F) Submitted: September 15, 2004 Decided: September 27, 2004 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert William Puckett, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For the purpose of this appeal, we construe Puckett’s first request for a certificate of appealability as a notice of appeal and find that the date appearing on that document is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert William Puckett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on April 22, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on October 21, 2003. * Because Puckett failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny Puckett’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal- 3 - contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
### StormKlear EPA Case Study

Project: Arundel Preserve, Hanover, MD

Master Developer: Somerset Construction

Developers: Bozzuto Development, Southern Mgmt.,

Toll Brothers, COPT

Product: StormKlear DPS Segmented Socks

Dose Rate: 5 mg/L

Description: Arundel Preserv e is a 268 acre, mixed

‐ use community located in the heart of the Baltimore

‐ Washington Corridor, which is part of the 1,100

‐ acre Arundel Mills Development. In areas near BWI

International Airport, sediment basins must be dewatered within 48 hours after a rain event, and meet a

125 NTU discharge limit; even though the site was thoroughly stabilized, the fine suspended particles in

the runoff required additional chemical treatment. StormKlear DPS Segmented Geosynthetic Socks were

presoaked and placed in an 8” dual chambered schedule 40 PVC manifold. The DBP

‐ 2100 Socks were

installed in the first chamber, and the GelFloc Socks in the second; the discharge hose was then routed

to a 15’ x 15’ TerraTex N10 filterbag.

Results – Influent: 570 NTU, Filterbag Discharge: <50 NTU

Residual Biopolymer Test: Negative
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

SLSCO, Ltd. ) ASBCA No. 63152

)

Under Contract No. W912PP

- 19

- C

- 0018 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Dean W. Baxtresser, Esq.

David R. Hazelton, Esq.

Walter A. Perry, Esq.

Latham & Watkins LLP

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Joseph C. Mobbley, Esq.

Joseph E. Merrion, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys

U.S. Army Engineer District, Phoenix

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: September 6, 2022

DAVID B. STINSON

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63152

, Appeal of SLSCO, Ltd.

, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: September 6, 2022

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-186895) and Amendment No. 374 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Tunisia
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
No. 12007.

#### The Cincinnati, Lawrenceburg & Aurora Electric Street Railway Co. *v.*Barrow, Admx.

Decided January 18, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Plamilton county.

*Messrs. Robertson & Buchwalter,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Dudley P. Wayne*and *Mr. W. A.*
      *550
      *Hicks,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, Davis, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2012103EN.01000201.xml

| 11.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 April 2012

2012/C 103/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3114 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4395 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82690 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8730 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2027 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5815 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,795 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6993 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1706 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3707 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3624 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2741 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3092 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1834 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6043 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6532 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 495,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,4085 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2760 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4738 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 014,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0331 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,187 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,8980 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,588 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3836 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0680 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,5040 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3114

JPY

Japanese yen

106,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4395

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82690

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8730

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2027

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5815

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,795

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6993

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1706

RON

Romanian leu

4,3707

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3624

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2741

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3092

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1834

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6043

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6532

KRW

South Korean won

1 495,43

ZAR

South African rand

10,4085

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2760

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4738

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 014,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0331

PHP

Philippine peso

56,187

RUB

Russian rouble

38,8980

THB

Thai baht

40,588

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3836

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0680

INR

Indian rupee

67,5040

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Governments
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.26 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 Consolidated Federal Funds Report: 2010 and Federal Aid to States for Fiscal Year 2010 These two reports provide an overview of virtually all federal spending at the national, state and county levels. The Consolidated Federal Funds Report shows spending for procurement contracts, salaries and wages, direct payments and loans, grants and insurance. The Federal Aid to States report show federal grants to state and local government. Internet addresses: Consolidated Federal Funds Report: 2010 <https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/cffr-10.pdf> [PDF] and Federal Aid to States for Fiscal Year 2010 <https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/fas-10.pdf> [PDF]. **Highlights** [PDF] **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Eddie ROBINSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. H-411.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

April 18, 1968.

George G. Phillips, Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record on appeal, the briefs filed and the cases cited and find that no reversible error occurred in the lower court. Therefore, the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed. Law v. State, 204 So.2d 741 (Fla.App.2d, 1967); Kelly v. State, 202 So.2d 901 (Fla.App.2d, 1967); and Moffett v. State, 179 So.2d 408 (Fla.App.2d, 1965).

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Fred O. DICKINSON, Jr., etc., Appellant, v. Alto ADAMS, Appellee.

No. 42596.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 24, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
260 La. 133

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Fred S. VAN BLAIR.

No. 51980.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1971.

In re: Fred S. Van Blair applying for certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ denied. A jury trial is not required when, as here, the maximum sentence does not exceed six months. Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66, 90 S.Ct. 1886, 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970). Cf. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Bates, 258 La. 1049, 249 So.2d 127 (1971).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0564 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KASEY NICHOL HUGS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 2 2022

11/02/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0564
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Argon ST, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Aaron N. Daniels
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases News Conferences
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				News Releases
 				**Press Kits**
 				Tip Sheets
 Data Access Tools for Reporters and Editors Thursday, Jan. 12, 2012, 1 p.m. EST | Media Advisory **Slides** [PDF] **Archived Webinar** [WMV] **Data Access Tools** **American FactFinder**
Use this data access tool for looking up a variety of Census Bureau statistics, including information from the Decennial Census, American Community Survey, Economic Census and Population Estimates Program. American FactFinder Tutorial **County Business Patterns and Demographics Interactive Map**
This map provides the total number of establishments, annual payroll, and total employees for a county, along with the number and percent of total businesses across 20 industry sectors such as, manufacturing, retail trade and health care and social assistance. Additionally, the map displays several top 10 lists, including the top 10 counties with the most full-service restaurants and the top 10 states with the most hotels. More information: County Business Patterns The map also includes demographic and housing information from the 2010 Census, such as sex, age, race, Hispanic origin and housing tenure and occupancy.
More Information: 2010 Census Press Kits **Economic Indicators**
This page contains more information about the economic indicators found on the census.gov dashboard, including the current press release, archived releases and historical time series. **Voting and Registration Statistics**
Information on reported voting and registration by various demographic and socioeconomic characteristics is collected for the nation in November of Congressional and Presidential election years in the Current Population Survey (CPS). **Quick Facts**
Using the Quick Facts, you can quickly get to a factsheet about your state, county or city.  The factsheet shows demographic information, social characteristics and business statistics. **Media Resources**ReleasesTip SheetsFacts for FeaturesEmbargo SubscriptionContact Us
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy