alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Daxor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Feldschuh, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor Corporation.





/s/ Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.Joseph FeldshcuhPresident

Chief Executive Officer

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Principal Executive OfficerMarch 29, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Daxor Corporation and will be retained by Daxor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Voting

The Newsroom site has been redesigned and relocated.  This is the archive area.

For the most current releases please visit the redesigned newsroom at:https://www.census.gov/newsroom.html

For previous press releases please contact the Public Information Office at 301-763-3030.

### 2012

                          - June  5:   Voting Hot Report: State-Level Maps and Graphs on Voting 
                          - February 15:   Graphs on Historical Voting Trends
                          - January  5:   Estimates of State Voting-Age Population: July 1, 2011 

### 2011

                          - September 28:   Census Bureau Reports Hispanic Voter Turnout Reaches Record High for Congressional Election

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Amy Vidrine Samson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 1, 2007 of CrownCrafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: June 20, 2007       /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson Amy Vidrine Samson
#### Julius P. BROXSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1-76.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

March 28, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation, Petitioner, v. Joyce M. BASS, Respondent.

No. 36615.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 24, 1968.

Donald L. Gattis, Jr., of Maguire, Voor-his & Wells, Orlando, for petitioner.

Albert Yurko, Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After oral argument and upon further consideration we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

CALDWELL, C. J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the annual report of DataMetrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending October 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
Bertram, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

         DATAMETRICS CORPORATION

         By: Daniel Bertram
             -------------------
             Daniel Bertram, CEO

         Dated: February 12, 2007
# C_2013061EN.01000101.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6831 — General Motors Company/Parts of Ally Financial)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 61/01

On 22 February 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6831. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6831. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# CA2011369EN.01000101.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 369/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 369/1

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION

EPSO/AD/200/10

LAWYERS QUALIFIED IN ENGLISH, SCOTTISH OR NORTHERN IRISH LAW (AD 5) SPECIALISING IN LEGAL RESEARCH

(2011/C 369 A/01)

| EMBLEY | Patrick |
| --- | --- |
| HANLEY | Victoria |
| VALLERA | Giovanni |

EMBLEY

Patrick

HANLEY

Victoria

VALLERA

Giovanni

The reserve list will be valid until 29 October 2014.

29 October 2014

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
#### Jesse SELF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-240.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
From: Gene Robinson [mailto:texhills@verizon.net] 

Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 4:21 PM

To: Kenney, James (FAA)

Subject: Re: Petition for exemption, docet # FAA-2013-0127

Hello Jim,

You know what they say about being a "Frontiersman". We get to catch the first spears and arrows!

In reference to my exemption request FAA-2013-0127, please consider that exemption withdrawn. It will be 

superseded by the current 333 Exemption now in process. 

If there is anything else I can do for you concerning unmanned aircraft integration, please do not hesitate to call or 

email me.

As an aside, did you ever see my book "First to Deploy - Unmanned Aircraft for Search & Rescue and Law 

Enforcement"?

Gene

RPFlightSystems, Inc.

www.rpflightsystems.com
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6676

AARON LITTLE FRENCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JAMES SMITH, individual capacity; GARY HORNBAKER, individual 

capacity; RICHARD GRAHAM, individual capacity; JOHN ROWLEY, 

official & individual capacity; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, 

official & individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore, Maryland. Catherine C. Blake, District 

Judge. (1:08-cv-03476-CCB)

Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided: August 27, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Little French, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Little French appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. French v. Smith, No. 1:08-cv-03476-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 9, 

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
ex1054.htm












HCI VIOCARE


 







 


NOTICE OF STOCK AWARD


 







 


              of                                                                               , you have been granted a stock award of the Common Stock (the “Common Stock”) of HCI Viocare as follows:


 







 



	
Grant number:

	  	
 


	
Date of Grant:

	  	
October 24, 2016


	
Vesting Commencement Date:

	  	
See vesting schedule below


	
Total Number of Award Shares Granted:

	  	
5,000 COMMON SHARES


	
Term/Expiration Date:

	  	
N/A


	  	  	  










 


VESTING SCHEDULE:  This Award may be issued, in whole or in part, in accordance with the following schedule:


 



	
·

	
Fully vested on grant date
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Hispanic Origin Population
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.34 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JUNE 21, 2012 Who's Hispanic in America? Live on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" "America By the Numbers" Segment The U.S. Hispanic population grew more than 450 percent between 1970 and 2011. Find out more on Friday, June 22, at approximately 9:15 a.m. EDT as Roberto Ramirez, chief of the Ethnicity and Ancestry Branch at the U.S. Census Bureau, discusses statistics about the Hispanic population. Each Friday, C-SPAN's "America By the Numbers" segment features information from the federal statistical system. The program highlights the trends and allows the public to call in or email their views. More information on previous C-SPAN programs is available at <https://www.census.gov/newsroom/cspan.html>. **No news release associated with this product. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Mollie Netcher BOSTWICK, Appellant, v. Albert C. BOSTWICK, Jr., Appellee.

No. 1009.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 8, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATION
I, Amy Vidrine Samson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 3, 2005 of CrownCrafts, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 15, 2005                                                                   /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson   Amy Vidrine Samson   Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012144EN.01000201.xml

| 23.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6504 — Linde/Air Products Homecare)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 144/03

On 18 April 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6504. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6504. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LSP-WHITEWATER LIMITED PARTHERSHIP AS OF AND FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000949486
<NAME> LSP-WHITEWATER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          86,843
<SECURITIES>                                62,913,421
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,418
<PP&E>                                     118,384,598
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             188,316,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,315,011
<BONDS>                                    177,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               188,316,011
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DENIED and Opinion Filed March 15, 2024

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 24
- 00298
- CV IN RE MICHAEL A. RUF F , Relator Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR
- 11
- 02825
- 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida

- Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Partida

- Kipness Before the Court is relator’s March 12, 2024 petition for writ of habeas corpus or, alternatively, writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief. In his petition, relator challenges a trial court’s writ of attachment commanding that relator be taken into custody and delivered to jail fo r his failure to appear at a show

cause hearing and to ensure his appearance at the next hearing. In his emergency motion, relator seeks a stay of the writ of attachment and all proceedings related to his contempt or incarceration pending this Court’s action on his petition.
After re viewing relator’s petition and the record before us, whether properly construed as a writ of habeas corpus or a writ of mandamus, we conclude that relator– 2

–

has failed to demonstrate entitlement to relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.8(a). We also deny as moot relator’s emergency motion.

2 40298f.p05 /Robbie Partida

- Kipness/ / ROBBIE PARTIDA

- KIPNESS JUSTICE
No. 11408.

#### The Springfield Gas Co. *v.*The City of Springfield.

Decided December 21, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Clark county.

*Messrs. Martin &*Martin, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Roger V. Smith,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Stewart L. Tatum,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur. Summers, J., not participating.