alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Reinaldo G. JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 72-375.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 11, 1973.

Weissenborn, Burr & Hyman, Miami, for appellant.

Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HAVER-FIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In an action to recover insurance proceeds plaintiff-appellant, Reinaldo G. Jimenez, seeks review of an adverse summary judgment.

On January 1, 1970 an automobile accident occurred in which appellant was injured due to the alleged negligence of a Mr. Winkfield. At the time of the accident appellant had uninsured motorist coverage with appellee, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and Winkfield had liability insurance with First American Insurance Company which was later adjudicated insolvent on February 23, 1971 (see O’Malley v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Fla.1971, 257 So.2d 9). From the record on appeal it appears that the tort-feasor’s insurer became insolvent more than one year after the accident; therefore, the judgment should be affirmed. Insurance Company of North America v. Strauss, Fla.App. 1970, 231 So.2d 548; Bartholomew v. Glens Falls Insurance Group, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 698; F.S. § 627.727(3), F.S.A.

Affirmed.
Exhibit








AMENDMENT TO THE 
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of August 8, 2016, by and between Astoria Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Monte N. Redman (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have entered into that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 28, 2015 (the “Merger Agreement”), with New York Community Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), pursuant to which, at the Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the Company will merge with and into Parent, with the Parent surviving (the “Merger”);
WHEREAS, in connection with the Merger, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, Section 5.2 of the Company Disclosure Schedule (as defined in the Merger Agreement) permits the adoption of this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 25 of the Employment Agreement, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective as of immediately prior to the Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement):
		
	1.
	A new Section 11(c) is hereby added as follows:


(c)    From and after a Change of Control, whether or not the Executive’s employment terminates, at the Executive’s election, the Executive shall be entitled to purchase the automobile provided by the Bank that the Executive is using (or has ordered) as of October 28, 2015 at book value as reflected in the Company’s books, plus any sales tax and registration fees.
		
	2.
	Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts entered into and to be performed entirely within the State of New York.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.  If the Merger Agreement is terminated by the parties thereto without the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, this Amendment shall be null and void ab initio.


[Signature Page Follows]


W/2622856











2










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


ATTEST:                    ASTORIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION






/s/    David J. DeBaum            By:    /s/    Gerard C. Keegan        
Name:    David J. DeBaun                   Name:    Gerard C. Keegan
Title:    Senior Vice President &                     Title:    Vice Chairman, Senior Executive
Assistant Secretary                    Vice President & Chief Operating 
Officer    






/s/    Monte N. Redman        
Monte N. Redman




[Signature Page to A&R Employment Agreement Amendment]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6673

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NATHANIEL JONES, a/k/a Devon Najee Hinton,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:06-cr-00044-REP-1)

Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Jones appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error, given that Jones is ineligible for the 

reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of 

the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 3:06-cr-00044-

REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FRANKLIN LAMAR BUTLER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 748 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

655 

CA 14-02110 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

PRISCILLA MORRIS, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE 

ESTATE OF FRANCIS LEE MORRIS, DECEASED, 

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

ROCHESTER-GENESEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 

AUTHORITY, LIFT LINE, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,

ET AL., DEFENDANT. 

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (GRETA K. KOLCON OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., ROCHESTER (K. JOHN WRIGHT OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J.

Scott Odorisi, J.), entered April 7, 2014. The order, among other

things, denied in part the motion of defendants Rochester-Genesee

Regional Transportation Authority and Lift Line, Inc., to dismiss

certain causes of action.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by the attorneys for the parties on April 26 and 28, 2015,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### Frank Latorre, Respondent, *v.*Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

March 12, 1953.

*185
      *Charles A. Nolan, Jr.,*and *B. C. Kelly*for appellant.

*Joseph H. Sand*and *Milton Berelson*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

A party securing a discovery and inspection is not required to furnish a copy of his own expert’s report to his adversary. *(Glichenhouse*v. *Pepsi-Cola,*N. Y. L. J., Aug. 6, 1942, p. 288, col. 1; *Hanover*v. *Kelly Dry Ginger Ale,*N. Y. L. J., Nov. 2, 1944, p. 1152, col. 2.)

The order should be unanimously modified upon the law by striking therefrom the provision requiring defendant to furnish a copy of the report of the discovery and inspection to plaintiff’s attorney and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The inspection shall proceed on March 25, 1953, at 10:30 a.m., at the place fixed in the order or at such other time and place to which the parties may stipulate.

Walsh, Cuff and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 285

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize voluntary withholding

of State income tax from monthly annuity payments under programs

providing annuities for survivors of retired members of the uniformed

services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mrs. MORELLA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize voluntary withholding of State income tax from monthly

annuity payments under programs providing annuities

for survivors of retired members of the uniformed services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VOLUNTARY WITHHOLDING OF STATE INCOME

4 TAX FROM MILITARY SURVIVOR BENEFIT AN5 NUITY PAYMENTS.

6 (a) AUTHORITY FOR WITHHOLDING.—Subsection (a)

7 of section 1045 of title 10, United States Code, is amend-
2

•HR 285 IH

1 ed by inserting ‘‘, or from the monthly annuity payment

2 of any annuity beneficiary,’’ after ‘‘entitled to such pay’’.

3 (b) DEFINITIONS.—Subsection (e) of such section is

4 amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(3) The term ‘annuity payment’ means a pay6 ment made under a program providing annuities for

7 survivors of members and former members of the

8 uniformed services, including chapter 73 of this title,

9 section 4 of Public Law 92–425, section 5 of Public

10 Law 96–402, and section 653 of the National De11 fense Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1989 (Public

12 Law 100–456; 10 U.S.C. 1448 note).

13 ‘‘(4) The term ‘annuity beneficiary’ means a

14 beneficiary of a program referred to in paragraph

15 (3).

16 ‘‘(5) The term ‘member’ includes a former

17 member entitled to retired pay under chapter 67 of

18 this title.’’.

19 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

20 (1) Such section is further amended—

21 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘or

22 former member’’;

23 (B) in subsections (b) and (c), by striking

24 ‘‘former member’’ each place it appears and in25 serting ‘‘annuity beneficiary’’; and
3

•HR 285 IH

1 (C) in subsection (d)—

2 (i) in paragraph (1)—

3 (I) by striking ‘‘former member’’;

4 and

5 (II) by inserting ‘‘, or any annu6 ity beneficiary entitled to monthly an7 nuity payments,’’ after ‘‘retired or re8 tainer pay’’; and

9 (ii) in paragraphs (2) and (3), by in10 serting ‘‘or from monthly annuity pay11 ments’’ after ‘‘retired or retainer pay’’.

12 (2) The heading of such section is amended to

13 read as follows:

14 ‘‘§ 1045. Voluntary withholding of State income tax

15 from retired or retainer pay and from an16 nuity payments’’.

17 (3) The item relating to such section in the

18 table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of

19 such title is amended to read as follows:

‘‘1045. Voluntary withholding of State income tax from retired or retainer pay

and from annuity payments.’’.

Æ
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: CEMEX CONSTRUCTION

MATERIALS PACIFIC SOUTH, L.L.C.

,

Relator. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 13 5

- C V

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Relator ’s motion to stay all proceedings, including the

discovery order signed by the Honorable Linda Y. Chew, Judge of the 327 th District Court of El

Paso County, Texas, on July 17, 2018 , in cause number 2017

- DCV1047, styled Christine Borrego,

as Executor of the Estate and Statutory Death Beneficiary of Johnny Borrego; and Melissa Ruiz,

Individually, and Robben Lee Betancourt, as Executor of the Estate and Statutory Death

Beneficiary of R uben Betancourt Ramirez, and Jose Gabino Garcia and Humbero Muela, both

individually, v. Cemex El Paso, Inc., Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC, Jobe Materials,

LP, and Ranchos Real Land Holdings, LLC . The motion to stay is granted only with respect to

the July 17, 2018 discovery order. The request to stay all proceedings in the case is denied. T he

stay will remain in effect p ending resolution of this original proceeding o r further order of this

Court.2

Further, the Court has determined that no action will be taken on the Relator’s Petition for

Writ of Mandamus pending a response from the Real Party(ies) in Interest. The response is due

on or before August 30, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3 1 st day of July

, 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

No. 19–0731

Pottawattamie County No. JVJV020462

Pottawattamie County No. JVJV020463

Pottawattamie County No. JVJV020464

Pottawattamie County No. JVJV020548

ORDER

IN THE INTEREST OF T.G., N.G., A.G. AND J.G., 

Minor Children.

C.G., Father, 

Appellant,

D.B., Mother,

Appellant.

The court, Christensen, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, 

declares this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 

(2019). 

Waterman, Mansfield, and McDonald, JJ., would affirm the 

judgment of the district court; Cady, C.J., and Wiggins and Appel, JJ., 

would reverse the judgment of the district court. See State v. Effler, 769 

N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the supreme court is equally divided 

on an issue upon which the district court and court of appeals differ, the 

decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”). 

Copies to:

Roberta J. Megel

State Public Defender

300 W Broadway, Suite 125

Council Bluffs, IA 51501–9011

Jon J. Narmi

535 West Broadway, Suite 202

Council Bluffs, IA 51503
2

Mary Alissa Triick

Anna Stoeffler

Assistant Attorneys General

Hoover State Office Building

1305 E. Walnut Street, 2nd Floor

Des Moines, IA 50319

Eric D. Strovers

Assistant Pottawattamie County Attorney

227 South Sixth Street

Council Bluffs, IA 51501

Amanda Heims

523 – 6th Avenue

Council Bluffs, IA 51503
#### Alton H. LITTLEFIELD, Appellant, v. Claudia LITTLEFIELD, Appellee.

No. 73-374.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 23, 1973.

Hal H. McCaghren, of Hal H. Mc-Caghren Law Offices, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Donald E. Brodbeck, of Simpson, An-stead & Brodbeck, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the briefs and oral argument of the parties, we are of the opinion that the post decretal order on appeal should be modified by deletion therefrom of numbered paragraph two. See Rule 1.110(h), Fla.RCP, 30 F.S.A., regarding subsequent pleading for divorce judgment modification.

Affirmed, as modified.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JT., concur.
# C_2012313EN.01000801.xml

| 17.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/8

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2012/C 313/04

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Vatican City

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Vatican City

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: The Vatican City

Subject of commemoration: The Seventh World Families’ Meeting

Description of the design: The inner ring features a family with the Cathedral of Milan. The inscription ‘VII INCONTRO MONDIALE DELLE FAMIGLIE’ surrounds the design, forming a semi-circle which is complemented at the upper right side by the name of the issuing state ‘CITTÁ DEL VATICANO’. The year 2012 appears on the right side and the name of the artist ‘G. TITOTTO’ followed by the indication of the engraver ‘LDS Inc’ is displayed on the left side. The mintmark ‘R’ appears at the bottom of the design, between the mother and the child.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued:

Date of issue: October 2012

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# Technical Documentation

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-1

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-2

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-3

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-4

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-5

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-6

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-7

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-8

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-9

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)	

# GU-10

Advance Report for Selected Characteristics for Guam(Island Area Level)
EXHIBIT 13.d

    CORPORATE INFORMATION

    Crown Central Petroleum Corporation is one of the largest independent
    refiners and marketers of petroleum products in the United States. The
    Company operates two high conversion refineries in Texas with a combined
    capacity of 152,000 barrels per day. Crown markets its refined products at
    343 retail gasoline facilities and convenience stores in seven Mid-Atlantic
    and Southeastern states. Crown's wholesale operations extend from its Texas
    refineries into the Southeastern, Mid-Atlantic and Midwestern regions of the
    United States via 13 product terminals along the Colonial, Plantation and
    Texas Eastern Products pipelines.
September 9, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LEON LAVIOLETTE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00555

- CV V.

MICHAEL RUTHERFORD , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on May 20, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Leon Laviolette.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Monroe J. Carell, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Central Parking Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.




Date: August 14, 2003                  By: /s/ MONROE J. CARELL, JR.
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Monroe J. Carell, Jr.
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# CA2013005EN.01000101.xml

| 10.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 5/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 5/1

---

Corrigendum to vacancy notice ECA/2012/74 — Director (function group AD, grade 14/15) — Secretariat-General — Translation Directorate

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 369 A of 29 November 2012
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 369 A of 29 November 2012

(2013/C 5 A/01)

The Court of Auditors has decided to publish vacancy notice ECA/2012/74 in the 23 official languages of the European Union.

The deadline for applications has therefore been extended.

The final date for submitting applications is 1 February 2013 at midnight.

1 February 2013

Candidates who have already applied are not required to resubmit an application.

---