alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Governments
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.63 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, SEPT. 27, 2012 Quarterly Survey of Public Pensions: 2nd Quarter 2012 https://www.census.gov/govs/qpr/ Also, for the first time, historical data from the Quarterly Survey of Public Pensions will be available in the Census Bureau's Economic Indicator Database <https://www.census.gov/econ/currentdata/>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2014038EN.01000201.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 February 2014

(2014/C 38/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3574 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,79 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4623 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83140 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8595 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2237 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4120 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,503 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,81 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1875 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4825 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0162 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5178 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5025 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5532 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6462 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7223 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 459,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0675 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2310 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6495 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 507,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5295 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,081 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,1200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,612 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2395 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1125 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,7270 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3574

JPY

Japanese yen

138,79

DKK

Danish krone

7,4623

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83140

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8595

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2237

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4120

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,503

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,81

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1875

RON

Romanian leu

4,4825

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0162

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5178

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5025

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5532

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6462

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7223

KRW

South Korean won

1 459,46

ZAR

South African rand

15,0675

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2310

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6495

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 507,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5295

PHP

Philippine peso

61,081

RUB

Russian rouble

47,1200

THB

Thai baht

44,612

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2395

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1125

INR

Indian rupee

84,7270

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF C ONTINUING A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: Rolando Acevedo, et al., v. The O’Quinn Law Firm, et al.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00138

- CV

Trial court case number: 392,247

- 416

Trial court: Probate Court Number 2 of Harris County

On December 23 , 2014 , this Court’s Order of Abatement granted the intervenors

a ppellant s ’ “ Unopposed Second Motion to Abate Appeal Pending Settlement Approval ” until March 20, 2015 , and stated that this appeal would be reinstate d on March 23, 2015,

absent another motion

. O n March 17, 2015, appellants filed an “ Unopposed Third Motion to Abate Appeal Pending Settlement Approval” for another 90 days until June 20,

2015. Appellants explain that, since the last update, finalizing the release has been delayed by the large number of lawyer

- defendants and their counsel. However, appellants contend that a third 90

- day abatement is nec essary because “the Parties are confident that a final formal release will be forthcoming relatively soon,” and then “the releases will be sent to Appellants as well as all other clients connected to this suit (approximately 1075 clients),” which will take about 60

- 90 days to complete , and then appellants expect to dismiss this appeal. Because appellants state that there are now

about 1,075 total clients involved, the ir unopposed third motion to abate is granted

. Accordingly, t his appeal ’s abate ment is continued

. However, c ounsel is instructed to update this Court regarding the status of settlement every thirty days from the date

of this order . Unless otherwise advised via motion to extend the abatement

, which will not be granted absent extraordinary c ircumstances, or a motion to dismiss the appeal

, the Court will reinstate this appeal on J une 2 2 , 201 5 . Upon reinstatement, appellants’

brief will be due July 22 , 2015.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: March 26, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         297,520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,944,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,551,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,127,677
<PP&E>                                      18,551,581
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,128,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,892,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,584,738
<BONDS>                                     10,020,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,794
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,277,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,892,599
<SALES>                                      3,895,460
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,895,460
<CGS>                                        3,168,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,168,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,892,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             442,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,607,445)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,607,445)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                361,837
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,245,608)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>
# C_2013335EN.01000601.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 November 2013

2013/C 335/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3460 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4588 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83770 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9438 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2346 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2535 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,155 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,41 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7025 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1829 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4513 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7443 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4422 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4085 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4363 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6216 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6791 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 431,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,7085 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2005 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6315 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 640,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3103 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,623 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,9833 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,527 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1146 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4647 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,9600 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3460

JPY

Japanese yen

134,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4588

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83770

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9438

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2346

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2535

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,155

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,41

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7025

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1829

RON

Romanian leu

4,4513

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7443

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4422

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4085

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4363

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6216

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6791

KRW

South Korean won

1 431,79

ZAR

South African rand

13,7085

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2005

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6315

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 640,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3103

PHP

Philippine peso

58,623

RUB

Russian rouble

43,9833

THB

Thai baht

42,527

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1146

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4647

INR

Indian rupee

84,9600

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7140

ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WELLPATH HEALTH CARE; ELI LILLY AND COMPANY; DOCTOR CUNNINGHAM; DOCTOR BASHOLM; MRS. WILLIAMS; ROCKY JOYNER; MAJOR R. E. SLATER; CAPTAIN C. WARREN; FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF ’ S DEPARTMENT; FORSYTH COUNTY COUNCIL; HIG CAPITAL EQUITY FIRM; DR. ALAN RHOADES; BOBBY KIMBROUGH , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Mid dle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv
- 01034

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : October 22, 2020 Decided: October 27, 2020

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Anton Thurman Mcallister , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Anton Thurman Mcallister seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing the majority of the claims raised in Mcallister’s civil complaint. The court, however, explicitly allowed several of Mcallister’s
claims related to the alleged deliberate indifference to medical needs to proceed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Mcallister seeks t o appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Mcallister’s motion to amend the case caption and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# C_2013010EN.01000201.xml

| 15.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6703 — FlRoWA Handels GmbH/OSI Europe Foodworks/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 10/03

On 13 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6703. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6703. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          72,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         48,560
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               15
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,396
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,585
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,146
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,146
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.07
        

</TABLE>
### APPENDIX 9A S ummary o f E st i mate d M o bil e S ource E m i ss i ons f or 2009 Eastern Massachusetts Non-Attainment Area (in tons per summer day) Primary Source: Massachusetts Statewide Travel Demand Model * MPO Region VMT VOC NOx Cape Cod 7,245,085 3.141 7.844 Central Massachusetts 15,101,259 6.514 17.078 Martha's Vineyard 299,211 0.135 0.309 Merrimack Valley 10,956,259 4.690 12.743 Boston 61,672,185 31.463 89.875 Montachusett 6,645,753 2.854 7.305 Nantucket 174,416 0.080 0.181 Northern Middlesex 9,071,326 3.916 10.080 Old Colony 7,529,750 3.285 8.074 Southeastern Massachusetts 16,961,935 7.330 19.637 Sub-total 135,657,178 63.407 173.125

Other Eastern Mass. n/a 0.093 1.838 Eastern Mass. Total 135,657,178 63.500 174.962 Western Massachusetts Non-Attainment Area (in tons per summer day) Primary Source: Massachusetts Statewide Travel Demand Model * MPO Region VMT VOC NOx Berkshire 5,841,241 2.544 6.827 Franklin 3,586,235 1.534 3.938 Pioneer Valley 15,410,367 6.656 16.969 Sub-total 24,837,844 10.734 27.734

Other Western Mass. n/a 0.000 0.000 Western Mass. Total 24,837,844 10.734 27.734

NOTE: Two different emission rate files from MOBILE6 were applied to travel model output: One file for expressways, one file for all other facility types (arterials, collectors, etc). NOTE: The latest version of the Statewide Travel Demand model, incorporating all the latest planning assumptions, was used for all of Massachusetts EXCEPT for the Boston and Berkshire MPO areas (where regional models were used). These regional models also used the latest planning assumptions for both these MPOs. NOTE: Calculations are adjusted by "HPMS factors" as required by the regulations. These factors equal the ratio of 2000 vehicle miles traveled (VMT) from HPMS data to 2000 VMT from the latest statewide travel demand base year model (or regional base year model if used), and vary by region. NOTE: Other Eastern Mass. results include net "off-model" emissions from park and ride lots, and commuter rail emissions outside the Boston region (the Boston region's net commuter rail, bus, and boat emissions are included within the Boston region's model results). Other Western Mass. off-model results are not yet applicable (none in place by 2009).
#### Richard H. KEMPER and Mabel E. Kemper, his wife, Appellants, v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, a public corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-770.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 20, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2012242EN.01000501.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6594 — Aegon/Liberbank/Liberbank Vida)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 242/02

On 19 June 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6594. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6594. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### AIR CONTROL INDUSTRIES, a Florida corporation, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Jack SECHREST and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43671.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 1999-CP-01667-SCT**  **JESSE ROLAND BULLOCK, JR.**

**v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI**  DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/13/1999 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. R. I. PRICHARD, III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MARION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: PRO SE ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: BILLY L. GORE DISTRICT ATTORNEY: RICHARD L. DOUGLASS NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 9/14/2000 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: 10/5/2000

**BEFORE BANKS, P.J., WALLER AND DIAZ, JJ. BANKS, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:** 

¶1. This matter is before the Court on appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion County dismissing Jesse Roland Bullock, Jr.'s Petition for Post Conviction Relief. Because Bullock's petition is time barred, we affirm. **I.** ¶2. Jesse Roland Bullock, Jr. pled guilty in October of 1991 to manslaughter and aggravated assault. On November 1, 1991 he was sentenced to twenty years for manslaughter and twenty years for aggravated assault, with ten years of the aggravated assault to run concurrently with the sentence for manslaughter and ten years to run consecutively. ¶3. In August of 1999, Bullock filed a Motion for Post-Conviction Relief. The circuit court dismissed the motion as procedurally barred. Bullock filed a timely notice of appeal. **II. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED BY RULING THAT THE APPELLANT'S**  **MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION COLLATERAL RELIEF IN TRIAL COURT WAS BARRED UNDER MISS. CODE ANN. § 99-39-5(2)?** ¶4. Bullock's motion for post-conviction relief was barred by Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2) (1994).

Pursuant to § 99-39-5(2) a defendant has three years after being sentenced to bring an action. Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2). The statute also establishes three exceptions to the three-year time bar. **Luckett v. State**  , 582 So.2d 428, 430 (Miss. 1991). However, Bullock does not fit under any of the exceptions. **III. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE TO**  **SUPPORT THE APPELLANT'S CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?**  ¶5. Were we to reach the merits of Bullock's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we would conclude that there was not enough evidence in the record to support this claim. See **Strickland v. Washington** , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984). **IV.** ¶6. Accordingly, the circuit court's judgment is affirmed. ¶7. **DISMISSAL OF POST CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED. PRATHER, C.J., PITTMAN, P.J., McRAE, SMITH, MILLS, WALLER, COBB AND**  **DIAZ, JJ., CONCUR.**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Theundersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,2006 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| *  **December 7, 2006* | * * | *By:*                   | *s/James F. Conway III* | * * |
|----------------------------------|----------|-------------------------|-------------------------|----------|
| Date                             |     | James F. Conway III     |
|                             |     | Chairman, President and |
|                             |     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

----