alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013309EN.01000301.xml

| 24.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/3

---

New national sides of euro circulation coins

2013/C 309/03

On 9 July 2013 the Council of the European Union decided that the Republic of Latvia fulfils the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro on 1 January 2014 (1).

1

From 1 January 2014 the Republic of Latvia will therefore issue euro coins, subject to the approval by the ECB of the volume of the issue (cf. Article 128(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union).

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (2) with a view to informing all parties required to handle coins in the course of their work as well as the public at large.

2

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 EURO CENT | 2 EURO CENT | 5 EURO CENT | 10 EURO CENT |
| | | | |
| 20 EURO CENT | 50 EURO CENT | 1 EURO | 2 EURO |

Image

Image

Image

Image

1 EURO CENT

2 EURO CENT

5 EURO CENT

10 EURO CENT

Image

Image

Image

Image

20 EURO CENT

50 EURO CENT

1 EURO

2 EURO

Issuing country: Republic of Latvia

Date of issue: January 2014

Description of the designs: The 1-, 2- and 5-euro cent coins show the small coat of arms of the Republic of Latvia. At the bottom, the country of issuance ‘LATVIJA’. On the left, the year ‘2014’.

The 10-, 20- and 50-euro cent coins depict the large coat of arms of the Republic of Latvia. On the bottom, the year ‘2014’ and the country of issuance ‘LATVIJA’.

The 1- and 2-euro coins show a portrait of a Latvian folk-maid, originally depicted on the reverse of the 5-lats silver coin in 1929. On the left, in semi-circle, the word ‘LATVIJAS’ and the year ‘2014’ and on the right, in semi-circle, the word ‘REPUBLIKA’.

The coin's outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

The edge-lettering of the 2-euro coin is the first line of the State anthem — ‘DIEVS SVĒTĪ LATVIJU’ (‘GOD BLESS LATVIA’).

---

(1)  Council Decision of 9 July 2013 on the adoption by Latvia of the euro on 1 January 2014 (OJ L 195, 18.7.2013, p. 24).

1

(2)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, OJ C 254, 20.10.2006, p. 6 and OJ C 248, 23.10.2007, p. 8 for a reference to the other euro coins.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6984
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIS ALONZO GEORGE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-00-25, CA-03-13-2-BO) Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willis Alonzo George, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Willis Alonzo George seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that George has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-51039

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Lana K. Crown, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:19-cr-126-5

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Lana K. Crown pleaded guilty to a drug crime. She timely appealed. 

Her attorney moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967). See also United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Our court 

denied that motion, holding the case involved one nonfrivolous issue: 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-51039 Document: 00516256277 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
No. 20-51039

2

“whether the conditions of supervised release identified in the written 

judgment as ‘Mandatory Conditions’ and ‘Standard Conditions’ constitute 

discretionary conditions that the district court did not orally pronounce at 

sentencing.” United States v. Crown, No. 20-51039 (July 23, 2021) (citing 

United States v. Diggles, 957 F.3d 551, 556–63 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc)). The 

parties have now briefed that issue.

In the interim, our court has determined that failing to pronounce 

standard conditions that are contained in a district’s standing order is not 

error. See United States v. Martinez, 15 F.4th 1179, 1180–81 (5th Cir. 2021). 

Crown contests four conditions, but she does not contest that each of those

conditions is contained in a Western District of Texas standing order.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-51039 Document: 00516256277 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
DECORATOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
             COMPUTATION OF DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                 FOR THE FIVE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                1997               1996                1995              1994               1993
                                ----               ----                ----              ----               ----
<S>                            <C>                 <C>                <C>               <C>                <C>
Net income                     $2,898,339          $3,065,220         $2,414,678        $2,823,770         $2,370,232
                           ==============    ================    ===============    ==============    ===============

Average number of
common shares
outstanding                     2,971,870           2,917,464          3,231,960         3,286,619          3,163,089

Dilutive effect of
stock options on
net income                        202,834             222,048            255,761           331,217            452,238
                           --------------    ----------------    ---------------    --------------    ---------------

                                3,174,704           3,139,512          3,487,721         3,617,836          3,615,327
                           ==============    ================    ===============    ==============    ===============

Diluted earnings
per share:

Net income                      $0.92              $0.98              $0.70              $0.78             $0.66
                                =====              =====              =====              =====             =====
</TABLE>



Note:  Per share amounts and shares outstanding have been adjusted for a
       five-for-four stock split effective June 13, 1997, a four-for-three stock
       split in June 1996 and a two-for-one stock split in April 1993.
#### S. & V. CORPORATION, Appellant, v. MIAMI BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

No. 66-429.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 7, 1967.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1967.

*195Dubbin, Schiff, Berkman & Dubbin and Paul E. Gifford, Miami, for appellant.

Copeland, Therrel, Baisden & Peterson and Meek Robinette, Miami Beach, for ap-pellee.

Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, filed a complaint against the appellee-bank, seeking to recover corporate funds deposited in the bank which had been misappropriated by its president. The facts were not in dispute and both parties moved for a summary judgment. A summary final judgment was rendered in favor of the bank and this appeal ensued. We affirm.

On opening the bank account, the corporation caused a resolution with very broad powers 1 to be served upon the bank, authorizing solely its president to sign the checks of the corporation. There was no contention that the bank was guilty of fraud, collusion, or any active negligence in the honoring of the checks drawn by the corporation’s president and, in the absence of such, a banking institution generally is not liable to a corporation for converted funds drawn from such depository upon the checks of the corporation, signed by a duly authorized officer pursuant to a corporate resolution on file with the bank. See: Gate City Bldg. & Loan Ass’n. v. National Bank of Commerce, 126 Mo. 82, 27 S.W. 633; McCullam v. Third National Bank, 209 Mo.App. 266, 237 S.W. 1051; Griffin v. National Bank of Commerce in St. Louis, S.Ct.Mo.1922, 246 S.W. 180; Klachko v. Lawyers Trust Co., 170 Misc. 134, 9 N.Y.S.2d 309.

Therefore, the final summary judgment here under review is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

 * * * * * *

“That said bank be and is hereby authorized and required to accept, honor and pay without further inquiry, all checks and other orders for the payment or withdrawal of money deposited with said bank in the name of this corporation, including cheeks drawn to the individual order of the officers signing same and including also all such instruments payable or indorsed to the order of this corporation, when such checks or other orders for money shall be signed or indorsed in the name of this corporation by its officers signing below.”

* * * * * * *
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 55413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21811]

[[Page 55413]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0706; FRL-9916-57-OAR]
RIN 2060-AP06

Standards of Performance for Grain Elevators

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing that 
the period for providing public comments on the July 9, 2014, proposed 
rule titled ``Standards of Performance for Grain Elevators'' is being 
extended by 30 days.

DATES: Comments. The public comment period for the proposed rule 
published July 9, 2014 (79 FR 39241), is being extended by 30 days to 
November 6, 2014, in order to provide the public additional time to 
submit comments and supporting information.

ADDRESSES: Comments. Written comments on the proposed rule may be 
submitted to the EPA electronically, by mail, by facsimile or through 
hand delivery/courier. Please refer to the proposal (79 FR 39241) for 
the addresses and detailed instructions.
    Docket. Publicly available documents relevant to this action are 
available for public inspection either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, EPA WJC 
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. 
The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. A reasonable fee may be 
charged for copying. The EPA has established the official public docket 
for this rulemaking under Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0706.
    World Wide Web. The EPA Web site containing information for this 
rulemaking is: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/nsps/grain/genspspg.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William Schrock, Natural Resources 
Group (E143-03), Sector Policies and Programs Division, Research 
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number (919) 541-5032; 
fax number (919) 541-3470; and email address: schrock.bill@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comment Period

    The EPA is extending the public comment period for an additional 30 
days. The public comment period will end on November 6, 2014, rather 
than October 7, 2014. This will ensure that the public has sufficient 
time to review and comment on all of the information available, 
including the proposed rule and other materials in the docket.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: September 5, 2014.
Mary E. Henigin,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014-21811 Filed 9-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business & Economy    >Wholesale    >Monthly
   Monthly Wholesale Trade
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  The Monthly Wholesale Trade report provides national estimates of monthly sales, inventories, and inventories-to-sales ratios by kind of business for wholesale firms located in the United States (excluding manufacturers’ sales branches and offices). Data from this survey provide business leaders and policymakers with an up-to-date picture of the nation’s economic condition, and are a key element in estimating the quarterly Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
 Read More
 Latest Advance Economic Indicators Report
   Latest Monthly Wholesale Trade Report
   Release Schedule
 Announcements Notice of Revision -
   Notice:
 June 2024: July 24, 2024
September 2024: October 29, 2024 
 For all of our 2024 release dates please see our Economic Indicator Release Schedule.Special Notice - The Census Bureau is releasing Monthly Real Dollar Estimates of Wholesale Sales as an experimental data product. These experimental tables will be released at the same time as the Monthly Wholesale Trade report each month. Those tables can be found at census.gov/wholesale/realsales.html.API - The URL for the economic indicators data in the Census Bureau API (Application Programming Interface) has been updated to add /timeseries/. Examples can be found on the Developers’ webpage.
 You May Be Interested In You May Be Interested In  Interactive Tool Time Series/Trend Charts
                        Create your own customizable time series.
                        View More
   Mobile Application FRED Economic Data
                        Receive the latest updates on the nation's key economic indicators by downloading the FRED App for both Apple and Android devices. FRED, the signature database of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, now incorporates the Census Bureau's 13 economic indicators.
                        View More
   Around the Bureau Related Topics
                        See other pages that are related to this program.
                        View More


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2013337EN.01000501.xml

| 19.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6954 — KNB/UWI/Mitsui/Medini Iskandar Malaysia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 337/03

On 11 November 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6954. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6954. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
# C_2013035EN.01000102.xml

| 7.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6799 — Mitsui/Pag/Pag Italy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 35/02

On 31 January 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6799. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6799. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00685-CR

Derwin Jamaal STRAUGHTER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 360666

The Honorable John D. Fleming, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

MODIFIED as follows:

It is ORDERED that any assessment of attorney’s fees against Derwin Jamaal 

Straughter be deleted from the judgment.

As modified, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED June 4, 2014.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7194

MACARTHUR DAVIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-248-R) Submitted: January 12, 1999 Decided: March 4, 1999 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.MacArthur Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We agree with the district court’s denial of relief on the merits, but express no opinion concerning its discussion of the limitations issue. 2 PER CURIAM: MacArthur Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. * See Davis v. Hinkle, No. CA-98-248- R (W.D. Va. July 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2014262EN.01000602.xml

| 12.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/6

---

Notice concerning the implementation of Article 9a(7) of Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of air navigation services in the single European sky

(Publication of Member States' decisions establishing Functional Airspace Blocks)

(2014/C 262/07)

| Member State(s) | Reference | Name of functional airspace block | Entry into force |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Portuguese Republic, Kingdom of Spain | State Agreement signed on 17 May 2013 | SOUTHWEST FAB | 18 April 2014 |

Member State(s)

Reference

Name of functional airspace block

Entry into force

Portuguese Republic, Kingdom of Spain

State Agreement signed on 17 May 2013

SOUTHWEST FAB

18 April 2014

---