Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: 

 Project No.: 0317.00.005.522 Page 1 of 4 

 Project Name: TRI2011 CBI? 

 Yes 

 No 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Incoming 

 Outgoing 

Date: 01/17/2013 Time: 2:00 am 

 pm 

Company Name: Columbian Chemical Co. ERG Staff Name: Kim Wagoner 

Contact Name: Michael Reasoner Contact Phone Number: 337-836-6270 

General Subject: 2011 TRI PAC Discharges 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

On January 15, 2013, I called Columbian Chemical Co. to speak with Larry Scheinpflug regarding 2011 TRI 

PAC discharges. Larry’s number was disconnected, so I redirected my call to Barry Rowe, the regulatory 

contact listed in Envirofacts. On January 16, 2013 I left a message for Mr. Rowe stating my name, the reason 

for calling, and if he could call me back or pass on my information to the correct personnel for TRI data. 

I received a call back at 2:00 pm from Michael Reasoner on January 17, 2013. He confirmed that the reported 

11.1 pounds of PAC in 2011 was correct and that it is estimated, not directly measured. They assume that their 

carbon black has PACs in it correlating to the amount of TSS in the wastewater discharge. He indicated that 

this may be an over estimation, however, because they assume all the TSS is from the carbon black, which may 

not be the case. In addition, the wastewater discharged is non-contact. 

I also asked Mr. Reasoner why their PAC discharge jumped from 4.13 in 2010 to 11.1 in 2011. He indicated it 

was because they had several high TSS samples in 2011. The average TSS in 2010 was 8 ppm and the average 

jumped to 22 pmm in 2011. 

I then asked Mr. Reasoner if he would be willing to share their methodology for calculating PACs with us. He 

indicated that they would. I told him that I would send a follow up email with this request and would also 

provide additional background about the program, why we need the data, and how we use it. 

Follow up Email – Sent 1/18/2013

Dear Mr. Reasoner, 

Thank you for returning my phone call. As discussed, EPA is requesting clarification of 2011 TRI data as part 

of our 2013 annual review of industrial discharges under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act. I am writing to 

request clarification for the Columbian Chemicals Co., on behalf of EPA under Contract No. EP-C-12-021. 

Please see below for further background. 

EPA, Office of Water (OW), reviews TRI data to fulfill its review obligation under Section 304(b) of the Clean 

Water Act. The CWA requires EPA to annually review and, if appropriate, revise its water pollution control 

technology-based regulations, called "effluent limitations guidelines" or "effluent guidelines," that limit the 

discharge of pollutants to waters of the U.S. from various categories of industrial facilities. EPA is currently 

conducting its 2013 annual review of existing effluent guidelines and potential industrial guidelines which may 

need to be included (see http://www.epa.gov/guide/304m/ for further information). EPA will discuss this review 
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: 

and the results in its 2013 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan scheduled for publication in the Federal Register 

sometime in 2013 or 2014. 

As part of the 2013 annual review, EPA is evaluating the data reported to the 2011 TRI and needs further 

information to complete the review. Specifically, we would like to clarify the amount of PACs reported to the 

2011 TRI. Please review the following questions below. 

1. You had mentioned that you estimate PAC discharges based upon monitoring data for TSS. Could you 

provide us with a copy of the method you use to estimate the load? Could you please also indicate the 

specific PACs you expect to be in your discharge? 

2. Also, you mentioned that the reason for the significant increase in PAC discharge between 2010 and 

2011 is a result of an increase in your measured TSS from 8 ppm to 22 ppm. Do you know why your 

TSS may have increased during this period? 

We appreciate your help in interpreting TRI data correctly. If you have any questions regarding this request, 

please call me at (703) 633-1620. If you would like to speak directly with EPA regarding this request, you can 

contact William F. Swietlik of EPA's Office of Water/Engineering Analysis Division by phone at (202) 566-

1129 or by email: swietlik.william@epa.gov. 

Regards, 

Kim Wagoner 

 I followed up with a phone call to Mr. Reasoner and left a message on January 24, 2013 at 2:20pm asking him 

to respond to my email or return my phone call. 

Follow-up email – Received January 24, 2013

Ms. Wagoner, 

I received your message today. I have consulted with our corporate environmental manager to help answer your 

questions. I will speak to him again, and get back to you as soon as possible. 

Thanks 

Michael Reasoner 

Follow up email - Sent January 31, 2013

Mr. Reasoner, 

I was wondering if you were able to make any progress on getting the answers to our questions and if you had 

an idea for when we might expect to see a response. As I have mentioned, EPA is evaluating the data reported 

to the 2011 TRI as part of its 2013 annual review of industrial discharges and needs further information from 

Columbian Chemicals Co. to complete the review. 

Regards, 

Kim 
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: 

Follow up email – Received January 31, 2013

Ms. Wagoner, 

To calculate PACs released in our discharge water we use an equation that multiplies the lbs of water 

discharged by the average TSS content of the water by the PAC concentration on carbon black. We pull water 

outfall samples monthly to test for TSS. The monthly values are averaged to give us our yearly average TSS 

concentration in our discharge water. Looking at the calculation, we now believe the number we have reported 

as lbs of PACs release to water to be high. The calculation we are using assumes all TSS in our discharge water 

to be carbon black, which we know is not the case. The majority of the TSS in our water discharge is sediment 

and organic matter present in the ditch where the TSS samples are pulled. 

We have sent a sample of our discharge water to our testing lab to be tested for PAC content. This will give us a 

PAC concentration number to use in our calculation that will be more realistic as to the PAC content of the 

discharge water. We are currently waiting on these results to be returned from the testing lab. 

The increase in PAC release from 2010 to 2011 was due to an abnormally high discharge water TSS content 

measurement in December of 2011. The sample was pulled after a rain event when the water flow in the outfall 

had a high sediment concentration. As stated above, our calculation assumes all TSS content in discharge water 

is carbon black. Therefore, the high PAC content was a direct reflection of high sediment level in the water 

when the December 2011 TSS sample was collected. 

Once we receive the PAC results from our lab, we will reevaluate the method we use to calculate the PAC 

concentration in our discharge. If you would like, I will send you a copy of the test results. 

Follow up email – Sent February 21, 2013

Michael, 

I am following up to see if you have had a chance to get your PAC test results back from the lab. If so, EPA 

would like to request the sampling results, including the specific PACs detected (if available) and the 

corresponding concentrations. For the purposes of EPA's annual review of industrial wastewater discharges we 

would like to revise your PAC concentration to more accurately characterize your discharge. 

Thank you for your time. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. 

Kim 

Follow up email – Received February 26, 2013

Ms. Wagoner, 

I have attached the lab results for the PAC test we ran on our discharge water. All the test results were below 

the detection limits. We will test again to verify, and we will begin reporting PAC release to discharge water as 

0 on our TRI reports 

Let me know if you have any questions. 

Thanks 
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: 

Michael Resoner 

Follow up email – Sent February 28, 2013

Mr. Reasoner, 

Thank you for providing a copy of your PAC test results. 

With regard to any changes that you would make on your TRI reports, please note that our questions about 

detections only apply to EPA's use of TRI data to support its annual review of industrial wastewater discharges. 

TRI has specific guidance for persistent, bioaccumulative toxins, including PACs, which require special 

consideration of how to report. As you are probably aware, you can find additional PACs reporting guidance at 

http://www.epa.gov/tri/reporting_materials/guidance_docs/pdf/2001/2001pacs.pdf. 

The TRI program requirements must be followed for reporting, including the following: 

"EPA eliminated the de minimis exemption for EPCRA Section 313 PBT chemicals, including the PAC 

category. This means that facilities are required to include all amounts of PACs in threshold determinations and 

release and other waste management calculations regardless of the concentration of the PACs in mixtures or 

trade name products (40 CFR 372.38(a)). However, the elimination of the de minimis exemption for PBT 

chemicals does not affect the applicability of the de minimis exemption to supplier notification requirements." 

Our use of the TRI data is a secondary use and should not override how you are required to report to TRI. 

Thank you again for your prompt feedback. Please let us know if you have any additional questions or concerns. 

Kim 
January 29, 2013

Columbian Chemicals Company

Michael Reasoner

Dear Michael Reasoner:

RE: PAH Testing Order No.: 13011234

FAX: (337) 836-0225

TEL: (337) 836-5641

P O Drawer 1149

Franklin, LA 705381149

Sherry Laboratories - Louisiana

2417 W. Pinhook Road

Lafayette, LA 70508-3344

Website: www.sherrylabs.com

TEL: 337.235.0483 FAX: 337.233.6540

Sherry Laboratories Louisiana, LLC received 1 sample(s) on 1/24/2013 for the analyses 

presented in the following report.

Annie Reedy

In accordance with your instructions, Sherry Laboratories/Louisiana conducted the analysis 

shown on the following pages on samples submitted by your company. The results related only 

to the items tested. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were conducted using EPA approved 

methodologies and all test results meet all requirements of TNI. All relevant sampling 

information is on the attached Chain-of-Custody form.

All soil data, except for 29-B, are on a wet-weight basis unless otherwise indicated in the units 

field as –dry.

LELAP Certification No.: 01997. A scope of accredited parameters is available upon request. A 

"#" by the test method or analyte indicates this parameter is outside the scope of accreditation.

Estimated uncertainty is available upon request. This report shall not be reproduced except in 

full, without the written approval of the laboratory.

If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

Assistant Lab Director

2417 W. Pinhook Road

Lafayette, LA 70508-3344

Page 1 of 9 
Project: PAH Testing

CLIENT: Columbian Chemicals Company

1/29/2013

Case Narrative

13011234

Date:

WO#:

Sherry Laboratories - Louisiana

2417 W. Pinhook Road

Lafayette, LA 70508-3344

Website: www.sherrylabs.com

TEL: 337.235.0483 FAX: 337.233.6540

Unless specified by the client, a duplicate or MS/MSD, wherever applicable, is randomly selected and 

analyzed from each analytical batch provided sample volume is sufficient. The sample chosen for 

duplicate or MS/MSD may or may not be a sample submitted in this workorder. A method blank and/or 

a lab control sample (LCS)/lab control sample duplicate (LCSD), wherever applicable, are processed as 

a quality control check for each analytical batch. When the matrix QC data is not available due to 

insufficient sample volume or when the results indicate possible matrix effect, the validity of the batch 

is determined by the method blank and LCS/LCSD. 

Any other exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the results page(s) or the QC 

summary page(s).

Page 2 of 9 
Project: PAH Testing

Client Sample ID: PAH Testing

Collection Date: 1/24/2013 2:30:00 PM

Matrix: AQUEOUS

CLIENT: Columbian Chemicals Company

Lab ID: 13011234-001

1/29/2013

Analytical Report

13011234

Date Reported:

WO#:

(consolidated)

Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

Sherry Laboratories - Louisiana

2417 W. Pinhook Road

Lafayette, LA 70508-3344

Website: www.sherrylabs.com

TEL: 337.235.0483 FAX: 337.233.6540

PAH BY SW8310 IN WATER - RECAP

POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS

SW8310 SW3510C Analyst: CRM

2-Methylnaphthalene < 0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Acenaphthene < 0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Acenaphthylene < 0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Anthracene < 0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Benzo(a)anthracene < 0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Benzo(a)pyrene < 0.000150 0.000150 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Benzo(b)fluoranthene < 0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Benzo(k)fluoranthene < 0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Chrysene < 0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene < 0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Fluoranthene < 0.0100 0.0100 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Fluorene < 0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene < 0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Naphthalene < 0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Phenanthrene < 0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Pyrene < 0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

 Surr: p-terphenyl 105 56-105 %REC 1 1/28/2013 6:02:00 PM

Qualifiers: 

* Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level. B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

C Value is below Minimum Compound Limit. E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits

M Matrix Interference N Tentatively identified compounds

ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit P Second column confirmation exceeds

PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits

RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Page 3 of 9 
Project: PAH Testing

Client: Columbian Chemicals Company

BatchID: 6467

29-Jan-13

QC SUMMARY REPORT

WO#: 13011234

Sherry Laboratories - Louisiana

2417 W. Pinhook Road

Lafayette, LA 70508-3344

Website: www.sherrylabs.com

TEL: 337.235.0483 FAX: 337.233.6540

Sample ID: MB-6467

Batch ID: 6467 TestNo: SW8310 Analysis Date: 1/28/2013

Prep Date: 1/24/2013

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual

Units: mg/L

PQL

Client ID: PBW

RunNo: 20578

SeqNo: 439779

SampType: MBLK TestCode: 8310_W

SW3510C

2-Methylnaphthalene < 0.000500 0.000500

Acenaphthene < 0.00100 0.00100

Acenaphthylene < 0.00100 0.00100

Anthracene < 0.000500 0.000500

Benzo(a)anthracene < 0.000500 0.000500

Benzo(a)pyrene < 0.000150 0.000150

Benzo(b)fluoranthene < 0.000500 0.000500

Benzo(k)fluoranthene < 0.000500 0.000500

Chrysene < 0.000500 0.000500

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene < 0.00100 0.00100

Fluoranthene < 0.00100 0.00100

Fluorene < 0.000500 0.000500

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene < 0.000500 0.000500

Naphthalene < 0.00100 0.00100

Phenanthrene < 0.00100 0.00100

Pyrene < 0.00100 0.00100

Surr: p-terphenyl 0.00208 0.002000 104 56 105

Sample ID: LCS-6467

Batch ID: 6467 TestNo: SW8310 Analysis Date: 1/28/2013

Prep Date: 1/24/2013

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual

Units: mg/L

PQL

Client ID: LCSW

RunNo: 20578

SeqNo: 439780

SampType: LCS TestCode: 8310_W

SW3510C

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.00501 0.000500 0.006000 0 83.5 46 96

Acenaphthene 0.00492 0.00100 0.006000 0 82.0 50 102

Acenaphthylene 0.00500 0.00100 0.006000 0 83.4 43 105

Anthracene 0.00569 0.000500 0.006000 0 94.9 62 107

Qualifiers: 

* Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level. B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank C Value is below Minimum Compound Limit.

E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits

M Matrix Interference ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit P Second column confirmation exceeds

PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit

S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Page 4 of 9 
Project: PAH Testing

Client: Columbian Chemicals Company

BatchID: 6467

29-Jan-13

QC SUMMARY REPORT

WO#: 13011234

Sherry Laboratories - Louisiana

2417 W. Pinhook Road

Lafayette, LA 70508-3344

Website: www.sherrylabs.com

TEL: 337.235.0483 FAX: 337.233.6540

Sample ID: LCS-6467

Batch ID: 6467 TestNo: SW8310 Analysis Date: 1/28/2013

Prep Date: 1/24/2013

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual

Units: mg/L

PQL

Client ID: LCSW

RunNo: 20578

SeqNo: 439780

SampType: LCS TestCode: 8310_W

SW3510C

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.00571 0.000500 0.006000 0 95.1 63 102

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.00471 0.000150 0.006000 0 78.4 46 135

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.00532 0.000500 0.006000 0 88.6 67 104

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.00549 0.000500 0.006000 0 91.5 65 101

Chrysene 0.00589 0.000500 0.006000 0 98.2 65 102

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.00484 0.00100 0.006000 0 80.7 46 99

Fluoranthene 0.00555 0.00100 0.006000 0 92.5 61 104

Fluorene 0.00512 0.000500 0.006000 0 85.4 56 102

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.00517 0.000500 0.006000 0 86.1 61 102

Naphthalene 0.00480 0.00100 0.006000 0 80.0 49 94

Phenanthrene 0.00568 0.00100 0.006000 0 94.6 58 103

Pyrene 0.00592 0.00100 0.006000 0 98.6 60 103

Surr: p-terphenyl 0.00185 0.002000 92.6 56 105

Sample ID: LCSD-6467

Batch ID: 6467 TestNo: SW8310 Analysis Date: 1/28/2013

Prep Date: 1/24/2013

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual

Units: mg/L

PQL

Client ID: LCSS02

RunNo: 20578

SeqNo: 439781

SampType: LCSD TestCode: 8310_W

SW3510C

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.00564 0.000500 0.006000 0 94.1 46 96 0.005008 12.0 40

Acenaphthene 0.00530 0.00100 0.006000 0 88.4 50 102 0.004918 7.52 40

Acenaphthylene 0.00501 0.00100 0.006000 0 83.5 43 105 0.005003 0.190 40

Anthracene 0.00599 0.000500 0.006000 0 99.8 62 107 0.005692 5.05 40

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.00586 0.000500 0.006000 0 97.6 63 102 0.005709 2.55 40

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.00485 0.000150 0.006000 0 80.8 46 135 0.004706 2.91 40

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.00534 0.000500 0.006000 0 89.1 67 104 0.005318 0.476 40

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.00558 0.000500 0.006000 0 93.1 65 101 0.005492 1.65 40

Qualifiers: 

* Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level. B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank C Value is below Minimum Compound Limit.

E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits

M Matrix Interference ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit P Second column confirmation exceeds

PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit

S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Page 5 of 9 
Project: PAH Testing

Client: Columbian Chemicals Company

BatchID: 6467

29-Jan-13

QC SUMMARY REPORT

WO#: 13011234

Sherry Laboratories - Louisiana

2417 W. Pinhook Road

Lafayette, LA 70508-3344

Website: www.sherrylabs.com

TEL: 337.235.0483 FAX: 337.233.6540

Sample ID: LCSD-6467

Batch ID: 6467 TestNo: SW8310 Analysis Date: 1/28/2013

Prep Date: 1/24/2013

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual

Units: mg/L

PQL

Client ID: LCSS02

RunNo: 20578

SeqNo: 439781

SampType: LCSD TestCode: 8310_W

SW3510C

Chrysene 0.00599 0.000500 0.006000 0 99.9 65 102 0.005889 1.76 40

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.00332 0.00100 0.006000 0 55.4 46 99 0.004843 37.2 40

Fluoranthene 0.00605 0.00100 0.006000 0 101 61 104 0.005550 8.62 40

Fluorene 0.00543 0.000500 0.006000 0 90.5 56 102 0.005124 5.77 40

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.00524 0.000500 0.006000 0 87.4 61 102 0.005165 1.53 40

Naphthalene 0.00504 0.00100 0.006000 0 83.9 49 94 0.004799 4.83 40

Phenanthrene 0.00614 0.00100 0.006000 0 102 58 103 0.005678 7.89 40

Pyrene 0.00604 0.00100 0.006000 0 101 60 103 0.005916 2.11 40

Surr: p-terphenyl 0.00170 0.002000 85.0 56 105 0 40

Qualifiers: 

* Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level. B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank C Value is below Minimum Compound Limit.

E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits

M Matrix Interference ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit P Second column confirmation exceeds

PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit

S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Page 6 of 9 
Client Name: COLCHEM_FRANKLIN Work Order Number: 13011234 RcptNo: 1

Sample Log-In Check List

Sherry Laboratories - Louisiana

2417 W. Pinhook Road

Lafayette, LA 70508-3344

Website: www.sherrylabs.com

TEL: 337.235.0483 FAX: 337.233.6540

Cooler Information

1/24/2013 4:30:00 PM

How was the sample delivered? Sherry

Were seals intact? Yes No Not Present

Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes No Not Present

Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No NA

Are samples (except VOA and ONG) properly preserved? Yes No

Was preservative added to bottles? Yes No NA 

Were any sample containers received broken? Yes No

Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No

Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No

Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No

Is the headspace in the VOA vials less than 1/4 inch or 6 mm? Yes No No VOA Vials

1.

2.

3.

5.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

(Note discrepancies on chain of custody)

Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No

Chain of Custody

Log In

(If no, notify customer for authorization.)

6. Were all samples received at a temperature of >0° C to 6.0°C Yes No NA

7. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No

8. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No

Logged by:

Completed By:

Reviewed By:

1/24/2013 4:56:20 PM

1/28/2013 4:07:28 PM

Heather Delay

Heather Delay

Caitlin Duplantis

Special Handling (if applicable)

17.

18.

Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes No NA

Person Notified: Date:

Regarding:

Via: eMail Phone Fax In Person

Created coc as per samples received. No sampler’s signature by client. Client did not relinquish chain of custody.

Additional remarks:

Client Instructions:

By Whom:

4. Coolers are present? Yes No NA

Cooler No Temp oC Condition Seal Intact Seal No Seal Date Signed By

1 4.3 Good Not Present

Page 7 of 9 
Client Name: COLCHEM_FRANKLIN Work Order Number: 13011234 RcptNo: 1

Sample Log-In Check List

Sherry Laboratories - Louisiana

2417 W. Pinhook Road

Lafayette, LA 70508-3344

Website: www.sherrylabs.com

TEL: 337.235.0483 FAX: 337.233.6540

Page 8 of 9 
DBPix Evaluation

www.ammara.com

Page9of 9