alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012026EN.01000301.xml

| 31.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 January 2012

2012/C 26/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3110 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4341 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83580 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8996 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2046 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6810 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,270 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,04 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6991 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2545 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3380 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3478 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2427 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3185 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1707 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6042 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6523 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 481,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3024 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2837 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5818 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 837,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0097 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,525 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8950 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,903 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2919 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0423 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,2350 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3110

JPY

Japanese yen

100,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4341

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83580

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8996

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2046

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6810

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,270

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,04

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6991

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2545

RON

Romanian leu

4,3380

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3478

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2427

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3185

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1707

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6042

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6523

KRW

South Korean won

1 481,36

ZAR

South African rand

10,3024

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2837

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5818

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 837,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0097

PHP

Philippine peso

56,525

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8950

THB

Thai baht

40,903

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2919

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0423

INR

Indian rupee

65,2350

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### R. L. PARKER, Petitioner, v. The HOME INSURANCE CO., Respondent.

No. 67-34.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 28, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

-Certiorari denied.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases News Conferences
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				News Releases
 				**Press Kits**
 				Tip Sheets
 **Event Materials** Presentation:Slides [PDF] Media Advisory: U.S. Census Bureau to Release New Data About American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Businesses News Release: Census Bureau Reports American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Businesses Generated $34 Billion in Receipts in 2007 Tables:
    - Table 1. Summary Statistics for American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms by State: 2007 [CSV] | [PDF]
    - Table 2. Summary Statistics for American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms in the 50 Most Populous Counties: 2007 [CSV] | [PDF]
    - Table 3. Summary Statistics for American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms in the 50 Most Populous Cities: 2007 [CSV] | [PDF]
    - Table 4. Summary Statistics for American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms in the 50 Most Populous Metropolitan Statistical Areas: 2007 [CSV] | [PDF]
    - Table 5. Summary Statistics for American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms by State and Kind of Business: 2007 [CSV] | [PDF]
    - Table 6. Summary Statistics for American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms by State (Percent Changes): 2007 & 2002 [CSV] | [PDF] Maps:  
    - Map 1. American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms, Percent of All Firms in Each State: 2007 [PDF]
    - Map 2. American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms, Percent of Change in Number of Firms: 2002 - 2007 [PDF] Charts:
    - Chart 1. American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms, Number of Firms by Kind of Business: 2007 [PDF]
    - Chart 2. American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms, Number of Firms by Receipts Size of Firm: 2007  [PDF]
    - Chart 3. American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned Firms, Number of Employer Firms by Employment Size of Firm: 2007 [PDF] Speaker Biographies:     
    - Thomas L. Mesenbourg Jr., Deputy Director, U.S. Census Bureau
    - Don Chapman, Senior Advisor on Native American Affairs, U.S. Department of Commerce
    - Stan Rolark, Chief, Public Information Office, U.S. Census Bureau
    - Anthony Caruso, Project Manager, Company Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau
    - Christina Redmond Daulton, Project Manager, National Congress of American Indians Background Materials Searching and Accessing Survey of Business Owners Data on American FactFinderSurvey of Business Owners Web siteCensus Bureau Blog entry: American Indian- and Alaska Native-Owned BusinessesMinority Business Development AgencyNational Congress of American Indians
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.35

                                   AMENDMENT 1
                          TO INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT

                                 BY AND BETWEEN

                       SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY

                                       AND

                       BIRCH TELECOM OF TEXAS LTD., L.L.P.

         The Interconnection Agreement ("the Agreement") by and between Pacific
Bell, Nevada Bell, The Southern New England Telephone Company, or Southwestern
Bell Telephone Company ("TELCO") and Birch Telecom of Texas Ltd., L.L.P.
("CLEC") is hereby amended as follows:

         (1)      Addition of APPENDIX FCC MERGER CONDITIONS

         (2)      Table of Contents modified to add additional Appendix

         (3)   This Amendment shall not modify or extend the Effective Date or
Term of the underlying Agreement, but rather, contains a termination date
specific to the FCC Appendix adopted into the Interconnection Agreement which
may or may not be coterminous with the underlying Agreement.

         (4)   EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN, ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
UNDERLYING AGREEMENT SHALL REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT, and
such terms are hereby incorporated by reference and the Parties hereby reaffirm
the terms and provisions thereof.

         (5)   This Amendment shall be filed with and is subject to approval by
the appropriate State Regulatory Agency of the state in which it was originally
filed and shall become effective immediately upon filing with such Agency.

<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Agreement was exchanged in
triplicate on this 14th day of April, 2000, by TELCO, signing by and through its
duly authorized representative, and CLEC, signing by and through its duly
authorized representative.

BIRCH TELECOM OF TEXAS, LTD., L.L.P.        SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY

                                            BY: SBC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
                                            ITS AUTHORIZED AGENT


By: /s/ Rina Y. Hartline                   By: /s/ Larry B. Cooper
    --------------------------------           ---------------------------------
Title:  Director of State Regulation        Title:  President - Industry Markets

Name:  Rina Y. Hartline                     Name:  Larry B. Cooper
           (Print or Type)                           (Print or Type)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

99 

KA 09-01381 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

ALAN TIDD, SR., ALSO KNOWN AS ALAN D. TIDD, SR.,

ALSO KNOWN AS ALAN D. TIDD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

MARY ANN BLIZNIK, CLARENCE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C.

Noonan, J.), rendered April 9, 2009. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the

second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the judgment insofar

as it imposed sentence is unanimously dismissed (see People v Haywood,

203 AD2d 966, lv denied 83 NY2d 967) and the judgment is otherwise

affirmed.

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 31.3*****CERTIFICATIONS***I, James A. Risher, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Del Global TechnologiesCorp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (theCompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date: November 22, 2006 /s/ James A, Risher       James A, Risher      President and Chief Executive Officer  
31
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3045

To extend through December 31, 1995, the existing temporary suspension

of the duty on diphenyldichlorosilane and phenyltrichlorosilane.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 9, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend through December 31, 1995, the existing temporary suspension of the duty on diphenyldichlorosilane

and phenyltrichlorosilane.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That heading 9902.30.77 of subchapter II of chapter 99

4 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States

5 is amended by striking out ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting in

6 lieu thereof ‘‘12/31/95’’.

7 SEC. 2. The amendment made by the first section of

8 this Act applies with respect to goods entered, or with9 drawn from warehouse, after December 31, 1992.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financialstatements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      2,675,657
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,021,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                121,268
<INVENTORY>                                 1,606,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            5,703,468
<PP&E>                                      3,141,571
<DEPRECIATION>                              382,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,557,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,037,672
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       850,000
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    35,352
<OTHER-SE>                                  8,701,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,557,791
<SALES>                                     9,465,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            9,465,798
<CGS>                                       8,385,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               8,385,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          132,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,827,986
<INCOME-TAX>                                3,964,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         6,863,519
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                6,863,519
<EPS-BASIC>                               1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                               1.94


</TABLE>
No. 11502.

#### Lynch *v.*The Ohio Wheel Co.

Decided February 1, 1910.

Error, to Circuit Court of Van Wert county.

*Mr. H. C. Glenn,*for plaintiff in error.-

*Mr.- FI. A. Reeve;'Mr. H. L. Conn*apd *Mr. O. A. Balyeat,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., -Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
MESA AIR GROUP 

410 North 44'" Street 

Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

Office (602) 685-4000 

Fax (602) 685-435P 

Januai7 29, 2010 ^OO ^

 - ^2X \ 

M. Clay Mortiz, Jr. 

United States Department of Transportation 

Research and Teclinology Administration 

Bureau of Transportation Statistics, OAl, RTS-42 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, East Building, E34 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re.; Confidential Treatment Request for BTS Form 41 for IVIesa Airlines, 

Inc.; BTS Form 298-C, Schedule F-1 for Air Midwest, Inc. and Freedom Airlines, 

Inc. (the "Forms") 

Dear Mr. M. Clay Mortiz, Jr., 

Please accept the following request in reference to the above listed Forms. As 

previously communicated to the Department of Transportation (the "Department"), 

Mesa Air Group, Inc's ("Mesa") fiscal year ends on September 30'^. As you know. 

Mesa along with its subsidiaries including the three airlines listed above file 

consolidated financial statements. All three of the airlines listed above have fiscal 

years ending on September 30'^. 

Mesa is currently preparing its fourth quarter and year end financial statements 

and expects to file with the SEC no later than February 28, 2010. The information 

contained in the Forms contains non-public information that will be included in Mesa's 

SEC filings. Mesa is providing to the Department unaudited financial information in the 

attached Forms and, if there are any changes, will resubmit updated financial 

information consistent with the final audited financials. 

Accordingly, Mesa requires that the Department keep the information provided in 

the Forms confidential and exclude it from any disclosures made pursuant to a 

Freedom of Information Act request or other request for information from any nongovernmental entity until after Mesa has filed its financial statements with the SEC that 

it expects to file as indicated above. 

If you need any additional information regarding this request, please do not 

hesitate to contact me at (602) 685-4052. 

Sincerely, 

p, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40084-40085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17280]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 23, 2018, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning Consortium, 
Inc. (``IMS Global'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, AccelerED, Bethesda, MD; Alief Independent School 
District, Houston, TX; Cobb County School District, Smyrna, GA; Essay 
Assay, Inc. dba ecree, Durham, NC; Idaho Digital Learning, Boise, ID; 
Italian Quality Company IQC Srl, Bologna, ITALY; Kyoto College of 
Graduate Studies for Informatics, Kyoto City, JAPAN; LearnPlatform, 
Raleigh, NC; Santillana Global, S.L., Madrid, SPAIN; University of 
Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN; and Wichita State University Office for 
Workforce, Professional and Community Education, Wichita, KS, have been 
added as parties to this venture.
    Also, ProExam, New York, NY; Macmillan Learning, New York, NY; 
Hancom Communication, Inc., Gyeonggi-do, KOREA; Funda[ccedil][atilde]o 
Get[uacute]lio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL; and Cerego, San 
Francisco, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project.

[[Page 40085]]

Membership in this group research project remains open, and IMS Global 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 30, 
2018. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 24, 2018 (83 FR 17850).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-17280 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 6, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00044

- CV

TITLE SOURCE, INC., Appellant

v.

HOUSECANARY, INC., formerly known as Canary Analytics, Inc., Appellee s

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI06300 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After considering appellant’s opposed motion for leave to file a supplemental appellant’s brief and appellee’s response in opposition, the court GRANTS appellant’s motion and accepts the supplemental brief filed on July 23, 2019 . Appellant is advised that it must still comp ly with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(2)(B) in that the aggregate of all of appellant’s briefs in this appeal may not exceed 27,000 words.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 6th day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
**Chemical Zebrafish**  **(TIQDT) In vitro**  **Alternative species**  **Mammal**

**KCLO 4**  **KSCN NaBr**  **NaNO 3**  **MMI PTU**  **BP2 Resorcinol**  **Phoroglucinol SMX**  **Amitrol ETU**  **Mancozeb Pyrazole**  **Genistein BPA**  **BP3 linuron**  **PFOS PFOA**  **BD -**  **47 BDE**  **- 209**  **HBCD TBBPA**  **DDT**DirecteffectIndirecteffect 

## Tier 1 in vitr o and 2 in vivo exposur es coupled to test f or disruption of th yr oid function

Figue 13. Comparison of tier 1 type assays ( zebrafish TIQDT screening assay and human focused i n vitro assays) and tier 2 type in vivo exposures [mammalian models (rat and mouse) and alternative species (fish and frog)] to predict and confirm thyroid disruption by a chemical. Red indicates positive, green indicates negative, white indicates no or conflicting data (adapted from Thienpont et al 2011).

### Xenopus tropicalis plasma TSH

Xenopus and Zebrafish TH /bZIP

- eGFP Thyroperoxidase

Hepatic Nuclear Xenoreceptors

Deiodinases

Thyroid Receptors  T4

– Serum Transport Protein Binding 

###  Serum T3 & T4  TSH

Tissue TH Changes Altered

Development Thyroid Hyperplasia Thyroid

Tumors

Birth Defects L ow IQ  T4 & T3 Synthesis  Phase 2 Catabolism

 Cellular Transporters
 Tissue

T4  T3 Conversion  Biliary Elimination



### Pathway 2 Population reduction

High social cost Perchlorate Methimazole, Ethylene

thiourea

PCBs, Phenobarbital, 3
- methyl

colanthrene, Triclosan Pr opyl

thiour acil, OMC, 4
- MC Sodium Iodide

Symporter

B isphenol A HydroxyPCBs HydroxylPCBs , pentachlorophenol Death

Figure 3. Major Adverse outcome pathways for thyroid disruption with ex ample toxicants, alternative species and non

- animal models applicable to human and ecological risk assessment. The red box indicates the critical event of serum level concentrations of thyroid h orm ones. 1. Rat pathway leading to tumors via thyroid hyperplasia. 2. Principle pathway of concern affecting humans. Figure modified from Mil ler et al 2009. a. Re porter gene ( eGFP ) detection of Thyroid Re ceptor (TR) activity ( Demeneix et al EST 2007 41:5908) b. Detection of developmental defects with zebrafish embryos ( Nesan D, Vija yan DM, 2012. Embryo exposure to elevated cortisol level leads to cardiac performance dysfunction in zebrafish , Mol Cell Endocrinol , 363: 85
- 91) c. Quantification of plasma thyroid Stimulating Hormone levels ( Ko rte et al 2011, fig from Hellsten et al. Science 2010;328:633

- 636 ) d. Detection of developmental defects with Xe nopus laevis metamorphosis assay ( Degitz et al 2005; OECD 2004) e. Direct quantification of thyroid hormone concentrations in zebrafish embryos ( Thienpont et al ES&T 2011) 

### To xicant Macro
molecular interaction Cellular

response Organ response Organism response Po pulation

effect

Zebrafish embryo TH levels

, 

### e b Xenopus laevis

developmental defects In situ detection of T4 in Zebrafish embryo d

a c

**U** 

### Pathway 1