alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012283EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6670 — Bridgepoint/Orlando/Limoni)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 283/01

On 12 September 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6670. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6670. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3057

To renew patent numbered 3,387,268, relating to a quotation monitoring

unit, for a period of ten years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1993

Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To renew patent numbered 3,387,268, relating to a quotation

monitoring unit, for a period of ten years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Com4 missioner of Patents, shall, as soon as possible after the

5 enactment of this Act, renew patent numbered 3,387,268

6 (relating to a quotation monitoring unit) for a period of

7 ten years beginning on the date of such renewal, with all

8 the rights pertaining thereto.

Æ
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Manufacturing    >Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, & Orders    >Press Release
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQS	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQS	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  Tuesday, March 26, 2024
 Monthly Advance Report on Durable Goods Manufacturers' Shipments Inventories and Orders
 March 26, 2024
 New orders for manufactured durable goods in February, up following two consecutive monthly decreases, increased $3.7 billion or 1.4 percent to $277.9 billion, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today.  This followed a 6.9 percent January decrease.  Excluding transportation, new orders increased 0.5 percent.  Excluding defense, new orders increased 2.2 percent.  Transportation equipment, also up following two consecutive monthly decreases, led the increase, $2.9 billion or 3.3 percent to $90.4 billion.
                                    
                                        Additional Release Materials	         Table 1 - Shipments and New Orders            Table 1 - Shipments and New Orders            Table 2 - Unfilled Orders and Inventory            Table 2 - Unfilled Orders and Inventory            Advance Total Manufacturing Estimates
 Contact
 Data Inquiries       Media Inquiries
 Related Information
 Business and Industry
 Manufacturing Sector
 Annual Survey of Manufacturers
 Economic Census
 Manufacturers' Unfilled Orders (M3UFO) Survey
 E-Stats
 North American Industry Classification System


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.106**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office								301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)301-457-1037 (TDD)e-mail: 2000usa@census.govStatistical Information StaffPopulation Division301-457-2422e-mail: pop@census.gov  

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12:01 A.M. EDT, MAY 23, 2001 (WEDNESDAY)

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Demographic Profile for Rhode Island

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the *Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000* for Rhode Island, a one-page table providing Census 2000 data on age and sex distribution, race, Hispanic origin, household relationship and type, housing occupancy and tenure (whether the housing occupant owns or rents).

 The profile includes nearly 100 data items in all, plus percentage distributions.

 In addition to the profile of the state as a whole, similar demographic profiles for counties, places and other geographic components of the state can be accessed on an embargoed basis at <https://www.census.gov/dcmd/www/embargo/embargo_demoprofile.html>. After the release time, go to the Census Bureau's online search-and-retrieval database *American FactFinder* <http://factfinder2.census.gov> or to its Demographic Profile Page <https://www.census.gov/census2000/demoprofile.html>. You will also be able to download the profiles from the bureau's file transfer protocol site <http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/>.

For information about how to order paper copies of Census 2000 demographic profiles, contact Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, 301-457-4100; or e-mail:<webmaster@census.gov>.

 For local context, contact the Rhode Island State Data Center, 401-222-6183; e-mail: <mbrown@planning.state.ri.us>.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### Nelda S. CAULFIELD, also known as Nelda S. Humphries, Appellant, v. Hubert E. CAULFIELD, Appellee.

No. 67-294.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

March 8, 1968.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1968.

Michael B. Piper, of Harris, Barrett, Dew & Sieber, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

C. J. Abernathy, of Jenkins, Abernathy & Dugan, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

At the .outset, appellant contends that she was not notified of a hearing at which an adjudication was made affecting certain of her rights. However, the record discloses that appellant was given adequate *268notice of the hearing, and thus appellant was not denied due process of law.

Appellant, in her other points on appeal, contends that the chancellor abused his discretion by making certain amendments to a final decree of divorce. Upon considering those contentions of appellant which are not now moot, we believe that she has failed to show that the chancellor committed reversible error. Therefore, the order is affirmed.

Attorney for appellant has filed motions for attorney’s fees for prosecuting this appeal. Upon consideration, the motions are denied.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 10.71
 
          SECOND AMENDMENT TO ADDENDUM TO SECURITY AND LOAN AGREEMENT
                        ("SECURITY AND LOAN AGREEMENT")
               BETWEEN DATAMETRICS CORPORATION AND IMPERIAL BANK
                             DATED: MARCH 21, 1995
 
  The Security and Loan Agreement between Datametrics Corporation ("Borrower")
and Imperial Bank ("Bank"), dated March 21, 1995, is amended as follows:
 
Borrower agrees that it will not:
 
1.) Make or incur obligations for capital expenditures in excess of $1,900,000
      during the 1995 fiscal year or in excess of $1,900,000 during any one
      fiscal year thereafter.
 
  All other terms and conditions of Bank's loan to Borrower remain unchanged.
 
Agreed: December 5, 1995
 
    Datametrics Corporation
 
                                                   Imperial Bank
 
By: /s/ John J. Van Buren                 By: /s/ Roger Kratz
-------------------------------           -------------------------------
Title: C.F.O.                             Title: Vice President
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Canada source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2

- 10

- 170

- CV

PERFORMANCE TRAILERS, INC. APPELLANT

V.

LAURA PICKERING, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEE S

VIRGIL PICKERING, INDIVIDUALLY,

AND KATHY LEA PICKERING AS

INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF

THE ESTATE OF RICKEY CHARLES

PICKERING, DECEASED

----------

FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “A ppellant Performance Trailers, Inc.’s Unopposed

Motion To Dismiss Appeal. @ It is the court = s opinion that the motion should be

granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1),

43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.Costs of the appe al shall be paid by appellant , for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 30, 2010
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic 

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of 

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go 

to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 23-BG-0480

IN RE RICHARD L. SLOANE

DDN: 2023-D046

A Member of the Bar of the 

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 489140

BEFORE: McLeese and Deahl, Associate Judges, and Washington, Senior Judge. 

O R D E R 

(FILED— February 1, 2024)

On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s consent motion requesting the 

court lift the August 16, 2023, stay; and on further consideration of the certified 

order from the state of Maryland indefinitely suspending respondent with the right 

to petition for reinstatement after six months; this court’s June 16, 2023, order

suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing him to show 

cause why the functionally equivalent discipline of a six month suspension with a 

fitness requirement should not be imposed as reciprocal discipline; respondent’s 

response thereto wherein he requests a suspension of not more than six months 

without fitness; respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed on June 30, 

2023; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, it is 

ORDERED that the consent motion to lift the stay is granted and this case 

shall proceed. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Richard L. Sloane is hereby suspended from the 

practice of law in the District of Columbia for six months nunc pro tunc to June 30, 

2023, with reinstatement conditioned on a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 

A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in

favor of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to this presumption should

be rare); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (explaining that a rebuttable

presumption in favor of identical reciprocal discipline applies unless one of the
No. 23-BG-0480

exceptions is established). Although respondent contends that a lesser sanction 

should be imposed, these arguments merely attempt to relitigate the discipline 

imposed by the state of Maryland, which is not permitted in reciprocal discipline 

cases. See In re Chaganti, 144 A.3d 20, 24 (D.C. 2016) (“[O]ur responsibility in 

reciprocal discipline matters is not to sit in appellate review of the foreign 

disciplinary proceedings, in order to determine whether they conformed in every 

respect to local procedural and substantive law.”); In re Zdravkovich, 831 A.2d 964, 

969 (D.C. 2003) (holding that, in a reciprocal matter, respondent “is not entitled to 

relitigate or collaterally attack the findings or judgment of the [original disciplining 

court]” and the infirmity of proof exception “is not an invitation to the attorney to 

relitigate in the District of Columbia the adverse findings of another court in a 

procedurally fair setting”) (citations omitted). 

PER CURIAM
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.36 **Contact:**  Jennifer Smits
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, MARCH 11, 2010 Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to the Navajo Nation in Window Rock, Ariz. Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why “I count!” and view messages from other road tour participants.
    
 For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit <2010census.gov> and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 10-0040 Focus Ready Draft 11/23/2009 ENGINEER: Prothero \ AG PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER: USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: safety gloves / eye protection / mechanical exhaust with HEPA filters recommended Respirator: half-face respirator with N95 or better filterrecommended Health Effects: Eyes: may cause mild irritation / Skin: may cause mild irritation / Inhalation: under common processing conditions and practices current testing indicates this material does not release respirable particles / Ingestion: do not ingest / Complete toxicological properties have not been investigated TLV/PEL:

CRSS : Chemical Name: Single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Neat: Solid Mfg: Solid Proc/Form: NK End Use: Solid. The molecular weight is variable and depends on the size of the nanotube. Consumer Use: SAT (concerns) (11/13/2009): Migration to groundwater: Direct and indirect photolysis: Negligible to Rapid PBT rating: P3B3T1 Health: 1 Not Required Eco: 1 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. The PMN is a nanomaterial (carbon nanotubes). Full assessment required.POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None.
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 10-0040

Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis:Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation: Dermal: INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 10-0040

Number of Sites/ Location: Unknown Sites Days/yr: Basis:Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:Dermal:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50063

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Robin Jean Schaub, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:19-CR-192-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Robin Jean Schaub has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Schaub has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 24, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50063 Document: 00516176969 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/24/2022
No. 20-50063

2

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-50063 Document: 00516176969 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/24/2022
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 3(ii).7

                        BURNHAM PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.

                               (the "Corporation")

                               AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS

         On August 31, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Corporation amended
the Bylaws of the Corporation by:

         Deleting therefrom the second sentence of ARTICLE II, Section 13(a)(2)
in its entirety and inserting the following in lieu thereof:

                     "To be timely, a stockholder's notice shall be delivered to
         the secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not
         later than the close of business on the 41st day nor earlier than the
         close of business on the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the
         preceding year's annual meeting; provided however, that in the event
         that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or
         delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date or if the
         Corporation has not previously held an annual meeting, notice by the
         stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the
         close of business on the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and not
         later than the close of business on the later of the 41st day prior to
         such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public
         announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the
         Corporation."
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000109 24-NOV-2017 10:49 AM
#### Richard J. McMASTER, Appellant, v. E. Wilson PURDY, Jack Sandstrom, Appellees.

No. 72-933.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1973.

Bretan, Marks, Attias & Raskin, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty. and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Higginbotham v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 769; Hillhouse v. State, Fla.1963, 159 So.2d 228; Hohenstein v. Wainwright, Fla.1963, 158 So.2d 527; Ivey v. State, Fla.1963, 157 So.2d 811.