40786 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices 

and the purchase of conservation credits 

would not be provided to effect recovery 

actions for the impacted species. The 

‘‘No Action’’ alternative would not 

result in needed improvements to 

reduce the risk of on- and offsite 

flooding and would not result in 

benefits for the covered species; 

therefore, the applicant has rejected the 

‘‘No Action’’ alternative. Under the 

‘‘Redesigned Project’’ alternative, the 

applicant would further reduce the area 

of the proposed project to the smallest 

possible footprint; however, the 

Redesigned Project would not 

realistically accomplish the project goal 

of the reduction of on- and offsite 

flooding risk. Under this alternative, the 

applicant would not achieve the desired 

goal of reduced flooding risk, and fewer 

conservation credits would be 

purchased to effect recovery; therefore, 

the applicant has also rejected the 

‘‘Redesigned Project’’ alternative. 

Our Preliminary Determination 

The Service has made a preliminary 

determination that issuance of the 

incidental take permit is neither a major 

Federal action that will significantly 

affect the quality of the human 

environment within the meaning of 

section 102(2)(C) of NEPA (42 U.S.C. 

4321 et seq.) nor that it will, 

individually or cumulatively, have more 

than a negligible effect on the California 

red-legged frog and California tiger 

salamander. Therefore, in accordance 

with this preliminary determination, the 

permit qualifies for a categorical 

exclusion under NEPA. 

Next Steps 

We will evaluate the permit 

application, including the plan and 

comments we receive, to determine 

whether the application meets the 

requirements of section 10(a)(1)(B) of 

the Act. We will also evaluate whether 

issuance of the ITP would comply with 

section 7(a)(2) of the Act by conducting 

an intra-Service section 7 consultation. 

Public Review 

We provide this notice under section 

10(c) of the Act and the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as 

amended, and NEPA’s public 

involvement regulations (40 CFR 

1500.1(b), 1500.2(d), and 1506.6). We 

are requesting comments on our 

determination that the applicant’s 

proposal will have a minor or negligible 

effect on the California red-legged frog 

and California tiger salamander, and 

that the plan qualifies as a low-effect 

HCP as defined by our Habitat 

Conservation Planning Handbook. We 

will evaluate the permit application, 

including the plan and comments we 

receive, to determine whether the 

application meets the requirements of 

section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. We will 

use the results of our internal Service 

consultation, in combination with the 

above findings, in our final analysis to 

determine whether to issue the permit. 

If the requirements are met, we will 

issue an ITP to the applicant for the 

incidental take of California red-legged 

frog and California tiger salamander. We 

will make the final permit decision no 

sooner than 30 days after the date of this 

notice. 

Public Comments 

If you wish to comment on the permit 

application, HCP, and associated 

documents, you may submit comments 

by one of the methods described in 

ADDRESSES. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public view, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Authority 

We provide this notice under section 

10 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) 

and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). 

Dated: August 10 2018. 

Stephen P. Henry, 

Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and Wildlife 

Office, Ventura, California. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17669 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–DTS#–26141; 

PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000] 

National Register of Historic Places; 

Notification of Pending Nominations 

and Related Actions 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is 

soliciting comments on the significance 

of properties nominated before July 27, 

2018, for listing or related actions in the 

National Register of Historic Places. 

DATES: Comments should be submitted 

by August 31, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent via 

U.S. Postal Service and all other carriers 

to the National Register of Historic 

Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St. 

NW, MS 7228, Washington, DC 20240. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

properties listed in this notice are being 

considered for listing or related actions 

in the National Register of Historic 

Places. Nominations for their 

consideration were received by the 

National Park Service before July 27, 

2018. Pursuant to Section 60.13 of 36 

CFR part 60, written comments are 

being accepted concerning the 

significance of the nominated properties 

under the National Register criteria for 

evaluation. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Nominations submitted by State 

Historic Preservation Officers: 

ALABAMA 

Baldwin County 

American Legion Post 199, 700 S Mobile St., 

Fairhope, SG100002858 

INDIANA 

Carroll County 

American House Hotel, 205 Michigan Rd., 

Burlington, SG100002859 

Elkhart County 

Selmer, H. & A., Inc. Factory, 1119 N Main 

St., Elkhart, SG100002860 

Grant County 

Marion PCC & St. Louis Railroad Depot, 1002 

S Washington St., Marion, SG100002861 

Howard County 

Greentown Commercial Historic District, 1/2 

blk. on either side of Meridian St. between 

Walnut and Grant, Greentown, 

SG100002862 

Madison County 

Anderson High School Wigwam, 1229 

Lincoln St., Anderson, SG100002863 

Marshall County 

Arnold, Isaac and Ruth, House, 1003 N Main 

St., Bourbon, SG100002864 

Rush County 

Mount Pleasant Beech Church and Beech 

Cemetery, E side of Cty. Rd. 725 W 

between Cty. Rds. 1000 N & 1100 N, 

Carthage vicinity, SG100002865 

Sullivan County 

Sullivan Courthouse Square Historic District, 

Roughly bounded by Section, Wall, State & 

Harris Sts., Sullivan, SG100002867 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices 40787 

Wayne County 

Dublin Friends Meeting House, 2352 W 

Maple St., Dublin, SG100002868 

Fountain City Historic District, Roughly 

bounded by Noland’s Fork, North, Hartley 

& Vine Sts., Fountain City, SG100002869 

MICHIGAN 

Calhoun County 

Old-Merchants National Bank and Trust Co. 

Building, 25 W Michigan Ave., Battle 

Creek, SG100002887 

OHIO 

Cuyahoga County 

Astrup Company Building, The, 2397 W 25th 

St., Cleveland, SG100002875 

Darke County 

Knights of Pythias Hall, 118 E Washington 

St., New Madison, SG100002876 

Franklin County 

Hartman Hotel, 275 S 4th & 150 E Main Sts., 

Columbus, SG100002877 

Hamilton County 

Provident Savings Bank and Trust Co., 630– 

632 Vine St., Cincinnati, SG100002878 

Hancock County 

Boss Manufacturing Company, The, 317 W 

Main Cross St., Findlay, SG100002879 

Stark County 

Lavin, Carl and Audrey, House, 5240 Plain 

Center Ave. NE, Canton, SG100002880 

Summit County 

Cuyahoga Falls Downtown Historic District, 

111–245 Portage Trail, 138 Stowe Ave., 

2035 Oldetown Loop, 2091–2250 Front, 

2044–2220 2nd & 2055–2253 3rd Sts., 

Cuyahoga Falls, SG100002881 

OKLAHOMA 

Caddo County 

Rock Island Passenger Station, 301 E Main 

St., Anadarko, SG100002874 

Cleveland County 

Southridge Addition Historic District, 

Roughly bounded by Classen Blvd., 

Oklahoma & S Ponca Aves., E Boyd, Macy 

& Okmulgee Sts., Norman, SG100002882 

VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Independent City 

Oakland Baptist Cemetery, 4195 W Braddock 

Rd., Alexandria, SG100002883 

Petersburg Independent City 

Halifax Triangle and Downtown Commercial 

Historic District, Generally bounded by 

Washington, Adams, Sycamore, Halifax, 

Byrne & Harrison Sts., Petersburg, 

SG100002886 

WISCONSIN 

Sheboygan County 

Badger State Tanning Company, 1031 

Maryland Ave., Sheboygan, SG100002888 

A request for removal has been made for 

the following resource: 

OKLAHOMA 

Cleveland County 

DeBarr Historic District, 

Roughly bounded by Boyd St., DeBarr Ave., 

Duffy St. and the A T & S F RR tracks 

Norman, OT91001904 

A request to move has been received for 

the following resource: 

VIRGINIA 

Charlottesville Independent City 

Wyndhurst (Charlottesville MRA), 605 

Preston Pl., Charlottesville, MV82001816 

Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60. 

Dated: July 27, 2018. 

Julie H. Ernstein, 

Acting Chief, National Register of Historic 

Places/National Historic Landmarks Program 

and Deputy Keeper of the National Register 

of Historic Places. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17665 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–1127] 

Certain Microperforated Packaging 

Containing Fresh Produce (II); 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on July 

12, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of 

Windham Packaging, LLC of Windham, 

New Hampshire. A letter supplementing 

the complaint was filed on August 2, 

2018. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain microperforated packaging 

containing fresh produce (II) by reason 

of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,083,837 (‘‘the ’837 patent’’). 

The complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Hiner. The Office of Docket 

Services, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

August 9, 2018, ORDERED THAT— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

1–6, 11, and 13 of the ’837 patent; and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘bags for fresh produce 

and bags containing fresh produce. The 

bags contain microperforations that are 

specifically designed and arranged to 

increase the shelf-life of fresh produce 

by affecting the mixture of gases within 

the bag’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES