Clear Sky Images, 7427 Matthews-Mint Hill Rd #105, Charlotte, NC 28227 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590 Re: Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from: 14 CFR 21 subpart H; 14 CFR 45.23(b); 14 CFR 61.113(a) and (b); 14 CFR 91.7(a); 14 CFR 91.9(b)(2); 14 CFR 91.103; 14 CFR 91.109; 14 CFR 91.119(c); 14 CFR 91.121; 14 CFR 91.151(a); 14 CFR 91.203 (a) and (b); 14 CFR 91.405 (a); 14 CFR 91.407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 91.409 (a)(1) and (2); 14 CFR 91.417(a) and (b)

Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Re

form Act”) and 14 CFR Part 11, George L Cole, operator of an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS), on behalf of Clear Sky Images, hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its UAS, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions out

lined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. Commercial operation of an UAS, as described herein, which are equipped with camera(s) and sensors, would operate in the following manner: Aerial photography and/or video for public and/or private use including real es

tate, architecture, land surveying, engineering and other related professional activities. Aerial video and/or photography for public and/or private use including television, public events, cinematography and news gathering. Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial structures under contract with the owners or local government authority. Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial utility infrastructure in

cluding but not limited to electrical power lines, wind turbines and cell towers.Aerial video/photography or providing live video feed to assist with search and rescue operations in cases of an emergency or natural disaster only when the local authorities or government has requested it by contract or donation. As described fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of a UAS under controlled conditions in the NAS that would be a) limited b) controlled c) predetermined and d) will provide safety enhancements to the already safe opera

tions in the industry presently using conventional aircraft. Approval of this exemp

tion would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “....establish requirements for the safe op

eration of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” The name and address of the applicant is: George Cole Pilot In Charge on behalf of Clear Sky Images 7427 Matthews-Mint Hill Rd #105-184, Charlotte, NC 28227
Regulations from which the exemption is requested: 14 CFR Part 21 subpart H 14 CFR 45.23 (b) 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.7 (a) 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) 14 CFR 91.103 14 CFR 91.109 14 CFR 91.119 (c) 14 CFR 91.121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 91.407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 91.409 (a) (2) 14 CFR 91.417 (a) & (b)Clear Sky Images will operate the Turbo Ace Matrix with a total weight of 12 pounds. The UAS dimensions are 34 inches long by 41 inches with by 11 inches high. In calm conditions the maximum airspeed of the aircraft is less than 40 miles per hour, with a cruising speed of 20 miles per hour. The Turbo Ace Matrix has the capability to hover and move along a horizontal and vertical plane at the same time. The Turbo Ace Matrix has four motors powered by a six cell 10,000mAh Lithium Polymer bat

tery. The Turbo Ace Matrix will be controlled by a 9 Channel computerized radio re

mote controller with an operating frequency of 2.400GHz – 2.483GHz, the Spektrum DX9. The live video feed will have an operating frequency of 5.728GHz – 5.850GHz. The applicant will operate the UAS in line of sight within a closed off and predetermined area owned and/operated by the property representative. Given the small size of the UAS and the controlled environment provided the pro

posed operations will adhere to the Reform Act’s safety requirements. The approval of this application presents no national security issues, regarding the level of safety surrounding the proposed operations and the public benefit, reduction in environ

mental impacts, including but not limited to reduced emissions and noise. The grant of the requested exemption is in the public interest, accordingly the applicant re

quests that the FAA grant the requested exemption with minimum delay. AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY The operation limitations proposed for an equivalent or higher level of safety be

cause operations will further enhance the safety of the persons and/or property us

ing conventional aircraft. These limitations and conditions to which the applicant agrees to and adhere to when conducting commercial operations under the FAA issued exemption as set forth in the Flight Operations Manual (FOM) include: The UAS will weigh less than 55 lbs. The UAS will have a maximum operating speed of no more than 50mph. Flights will be operated within line of sight of the Pilot in Command (PIC) and/or Visual Observer (VO). Maximum flight time for each operational flight will be 20 minutes. Flights will be terminated at 25% battery power reserve or 30 minutes of flight time which

ever occurs first.Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the UAS Pilot, and the Visual Observer (VO), and may include but not limited to a Camera Operator. A briefing will be performed regarding the planned UAS operations prior to each day’s flight consisting of all the days’ production activities. All flights will occur under Visual Flight Rules Meteorological Conditions (VMC) only. If operations will be within a 5 mile radius of the geographic center/Airport Refer

ence Point (ARP) of a tower controlled or uncontrolled airport the respective airports will be contacted advising them of the estimated flight time, flight du

ration, elevation of flight and other pertinent information. The operator will file FAA Form 7711-1, or its equivalent, as modified in light of the requested exemption, with the appropriate local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) no more than 72 hours but no less than 24 hours from planned operation. The operator will obtain verbal/written consent of all persons involved with the planned operation and ensure that only consenting persons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operation, and the radius may be reduced to 30 feet based upon an equivalent level of safety determination, as required un

der the FOM. With the advanced permission of the FSDO, operations at closer range may be approved.The PIC and VO will have been trained in operation of UAS and receive up-todate information for the particular UAS to be operated. The PIC and VO will be able to communicate by voice, radio, and/or text at all times. If the UAS loses communications with the remote controller or loses GPS signal, the UAS will have the capability to return to a pre-determined location within a designated location and land autonomously. The UAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obsta

cles, weather, or emergencies. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1) Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural require

ments for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a)(1). Given the size and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be util

ized by the Applicant, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular UAS. In all cases, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an airworthi

ness certificate, in the restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and conditions proposed. The UAS to be operated hereunder is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates exclusively within a secured and designated area. Unlike other civil air

craft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by both the operator and under the requirements and in compliance with local public safety requirements. The FAA will have advance notice of all operations. These safety enhancements provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners than conventional operations conducted with airworthiness certificates is

sued under 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to national security posed by the UAS, due to its size, speed of operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry a substantial external load. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft The regulation requires: When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," "experi

mental," or "provisional," as applicable. Even though the UAS will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be needed as the UAS will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the word “Experimental” can be placed. Given the size of the UAS, two-inch lettering will be impossible. The word “Experimental” will be placed on the fuselage in compliance with §45.29 (f).The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the UAS marked on its fu

selage as required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the UAS will see the identification of the UAS as “Experimental.” 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) and (b): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in Command. Pursuant to 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b), no person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire. Clear Sky Images may achieve an equivalent level of safety as achieved by current Regulations because the applicant’s UAS do not carry any pilots or passengers nor property. The risks attendant to the operation of UAS is far less than the risk levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 CFR 61. I feel the operation and limitations set forth in the FOM will equate to the safe operation of the UAS. 14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness. The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in air

worthy condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for deter

mining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft for maintenance and use of safety check lists prior to each flight an equivalent level of safety will be provided. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft. Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides: No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft ... (2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof. The UAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no room or capacity to carry such an item on the air

craft. The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flight manual at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate ac

cess to it. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action. This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be provided for the aircraft an exemption will be needed. The PIC will take all actionsas stated in the FOM in Section 4 under Normal Procedures including but not limited to reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight. 14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight Instruction. Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls. UAS and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the aircraft via radio communications. The FAA has approved exemptions for flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. The equivalent level of safety provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passen

gers will be carried in the aircraft and by the size and speed of the aircraft. 14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes. Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 (d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for a UAS that is a heli

copter and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 600 AGL, or not more than 200 above an elevated platform from which filming is planned, an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. As set forth herein, the UAS will never operate at higher than 600 AGL with the exception that in circumstances where the UAS is used to survey or photograph a structure whose height exceeds 400 feet AGL, the UAS will not be operated more than 200 feet above the highest point on the structure. It will however be operated in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre-obtained consent. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the UAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and participants in the filming activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Compared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55lbs. proposed herein and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL. In addition, the low-altitude operations of the UAS will ensure separation betweenthese UAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119. 14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings. This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising alti

tude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure air

port or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the UAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator, pur

suant to the safety check list and live flight data monitoring, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane un

der VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed – (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.” The battery powering the UAS provides approximately 20 minutes of powered flight. To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, UAS flights would be impossible. Given the limitations on the UAS’s proposed flight area and the loca

tion of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, waiving this require

ment for flight in daylight or twilight VFR conditions is reasonable. Applicant believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior exemptions. Operating the UAS, in a tightly controlled area where only peo

ple and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS. Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 20 minutes or 25% of battery power— whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the UAS to its planned land

ing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area. 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration The regulation provides in pertinent part:(a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following: (1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate. . . . (b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate re

quired by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passen

gers or crew. The UAS fully loaded weighs no more than 55 lbs. and is operated without an on

board pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents or to display them on the UAS. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate access to them, to the extent they are applicable to the UAS. 14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspec

tions. These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspec

tions, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies re

paired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or main

tain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43. Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness cer

tificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accom

plished by the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the UAS is very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted areas for a limited pe

riod of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAS can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 600 feet AGL. The operator will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most fa

miliar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condi

tion to provide the equivalent level of safety. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because maintenance and inspections will be performed in accordance with the UAS Manufacturer's User Manual. As pro

-vided in the FOM, the operator will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight and perform required maintenance needed. Additional Information The applicant, George L Cole, has been involved in the building and piloting of re

mote controlled aircraft for more than 9 years. He is also currently in training to re

ceive a private pilots license and currently has more than 20 hours experience ac

cumulated, and has had a successful solo flight in a Cessna 172. Also the primary pilot, George L Cole, has an in depth understanding of the capabilities and safety concerns involved in using this technology as an asset to the community. Satisfac

tion of criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012 provide more than adequate justification for the grant of the requested exemptions allowing the com

mercial operation of the applicant’s UAS. Sincerely,

George L Cole