alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Time and Date:

Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

# Place:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC

# Status:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Dayna C. Brown,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2018-16700 Filed 7-31-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

            We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 333-39690, 333-42753, 333-42747, 333-00537, 033-60169, 033-33373
and 033-69922 of Datascope Corp. on Form S-8 of our report dated July 24, 2000
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Datascope Corp. for the year
ended June 30, 2000.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
August 14, 2000
#### In the Matter of Abram F. Almosnino, an Infant.

City Court of the City of New York, Special Term, New York County,

June 11, 1953.

*Irving Kirschenbaum*for Pauline Goldstein, as general guardian, petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

*58Markewich, J.

The facts presented herein are virtually identical, except for minor changes effected by the passage of time, with those before the court when it denied an application made by the petitioner mother to change her infant son’s name to that of his stepfather (petitioner’s present husband) because — and only because — of the opposition of petitioner’s former husband, father of the child *(Matter of Almosnino,*204 Misc. 53). Then the father objected, using what are best characterized as dog-in-the-manger tactics. In arriving at that decision I did so most reluctantly because the interpretation by our appellate courts of the applicable statute had approached the problem from the standpoint of a property right in the name of the child rather than from the socially desirable angle of the welfare of the child. Accordingly in the last paragraph of my decision, I recommended that the Law Revision Commission or other appropriate body “ give due study to possible amendment to Section 60, Civil Rights Law, if such amendment be necessary, in the light of modern social progress in human relations.”

The Law Revision Commission, with commendable dispatch, undertook study of the question, and, happily, such a change has now been accomplished on their recommendation (N. Y. Legis. Doc., 1953, No. 65 [E]) by the enactment of chapter 690 of the Laws of 1953. Hence, nothing now prevents this court from doing what it should have been able to do, but for the father’s objection, over a year ago. Even the father apparently realizes this for, though personally served herein, he has defaulted in appearance.

Petition granted; order signed.
#### LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Mary BELL and James Bell, Sr., Individually and as man and wife, Respondents.

No. 73-582.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 2, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari granted.
From: LEVIN, NANCY

To: "Belen Leon"; monicasoucier@co.imperial.ca.us

Cc: Reyes Romero; Steckel, Andrew; Sutkus, Carol@ARB; Melgoza, Elizabeth@ARB; Lewis, Monica@ARB; Tasat,

Webster@ARB

Subject: RE: Draft Rule 217 - Tri-Agency - Informal Comments

Date: Friday, September 04, 2015 3:59:00 PM

Attachments: Draft Rule 217 Rv7 (Aug 19 2015) comments.docx

Dear Monica and Belin,

Thank you the opportunity to provide preliminary comments on Draft Rule 217 (August 19,

2015 version). I have attached the comments (generally we discussed on 8/31) as track

changes to the draft rule. We understand that ICAPCD plans to workshop the rule soon, and

that there may be additional changes to the rule prior to adoption. Please let me know if you

have any questions on these preliminary comments, or if you would like us to review another

draft prior to adoption.

Regards,

Nancy

______________________________________________

Nancy Levin Air Rules Office

415.972.3848 levin.nancy@epa.gov

US EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St (AIR-4) San Francisco, CA 94105

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Belen Leon [mailto:BelenLeon@co.imperial.ca.us]

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:59 AM

To: Belen Leon; Brad Poiriez; Reyes Romero; monicasoucier@co.imperial.ca.us; LEVIN, NANCY;

Steckel, Andrew; Sutkus, Carol@ARB; Drake, Kerry; Melgoza, Elizabeth@ARB; Lewis,

Monica@ARB; Tasat, Webster@ARB

Subject: Draft Rule 217 - Tri-Agency - Informal Comments

When: Monday, August 31, 2015 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

Where: Conference Call

When: Monday, August 31, 2015 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

Where: Conference Call
Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

A conference Call-in number has been set up for the Rule 217 – tri-agency meeting.

Date: Friday August 31, 2015

Time: 2 pm

Dial-in-Number: 1-605-475-6333

Access Code: 8456465
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000949859
<NAME>                        CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             538,596
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,164,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,523,669)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,082,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,900,689
<PP&E>                                          44,687,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (18,448,518)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,217,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,855,506
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        11,792,116
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,217,328
<SALES>                                         53,340,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,340,065
<CGS>                                           27,276,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,909,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,090,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,836,654
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 838,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,664,796
<INCOME-TAX>                                       565,799
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,098,997
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,098,997
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.10)


</TABLE>
#### Otis JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 36019.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Appeal dismissed without opinion. 204 So.2d 224.
#### Walter O’Neal BOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-639.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
260 La. 413

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Elbert JACKSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52054.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 17, 1972.

In re: Elbert Jackson, applying for writ of mandamus & habeas corpus.

Writ refused. Since the district judge has ordered an evidentiary hearing, it would serve no useful purpose to grant this application.
#### Christopher GIAN-CURSIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Bernard M. EPSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Nos. 35058, 35050.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 12, 1966.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1966.

Manners & Amoon, Miami, for Christopher Gian-Cursio.

Sam Daniels, Miami, for Bernard M. Epstein.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Herbert P. Benn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari and have heard oral argument. The decisions under review are Gian-Cursio v. State, and Epstein v. State, Fla.App., 180 So.2d 396. Our study of the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there is no jurisdictional conflict of decisions and that the writ was therefore improvidently issued and should be discharged. See, Hampton v. State, 50 Fla. 55, 39 So. 421, and, State v. Heines, 144 Fla. 272, 197 So. 787.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and O’CONNELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and SEBRING (Ret.), JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, J., dissents with opinion.

DREW, J., dissents and agrees with ROBERTS, J.

ROBERTS, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent because of my view the decision under review conflicts with the decision of this Court in Baldor v. Rogers, 81 So.2d 658, 55 A.L.R.2d 453. I would adhere to Baldor and quash the decision now before us.

DREW, J.p, concurs.
# C_2013025EN.01002701.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/27

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 January 2013

2013/C 25/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3469 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,71 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4626 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85140 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6889 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2444 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4240 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,605 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 297,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6987 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1769 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3633 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3787 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2917 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3553 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4440 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6099 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6586 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 451,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1300 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3790 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5813 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 999,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1114 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,821 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,4430 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,304 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7339 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0448 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,4630 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3469

JPY

Japanese yen

122,71

DKK

Danish krone

7,4626

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85140

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6889

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2444

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4240

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,605

HUF

Hungarian forint

297,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6987

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1769

RON

Romanian leu

4,3633

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3787

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2917

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3553

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4440

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6099

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6586

KRW

South Korean won

1 451,15

ZAR

South African rand

12,1300

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3790

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5813

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 999,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1114

PHP

Philippine peso

54,821

RUB

Russian rouble

40,4430

THB

Thai baht

40,304

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7339

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0448

INR

Indian rupee

72,4630

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CN.82SP **Contact:**  Oficina de Información Pública
301-763-3691
 PARA PUBLICACIÓN INMEDIATA:  MARTES, 26 DE OCTUBRE DE 2010 COMUNICADO DE PRENSA DE LA OFICINA DEL CENSO — Director de Oficina del Censo ofrece rueda de prensa para hablar de operaciones del Censo del 2010 Robert Groves, director de la Oficina del Censo de los Estados Unidos informará a los medios de comunicación acerca de cómo continúan llevándose a cabo las operaciones del Censo del 2010.  Groves hablará sobre las tasas finales de participación por correo, además de revelar información sobre la planificación del Censos 2020.  Esta rueda de prensa incluirá una sesión de preguntas y respuestas.
      National Press Club, piso 13
    Holeman Lounge
    529 14th St. NW
  Washington, DC 20045
 Periodistas que lo deseen, pueden participar por teléfono. Por favor llame con anticipación al inicio del evento para que la operadora pueda conectar su llamada Número a marcar:  888-603-8938
Código:  2010 CENSUS  Los materiales de prensa estarán disponibles en línea poco después de que se inicie la rueda de prensa en <http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/operational-press-briefing/>
  La rueda de prensa será transmitida en vivo por Internet en <http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=73902> 2 p.m. (EDT) en el día del evento.
 Por favor confirme su asistencia antes de las 5 p.m. del viernes, 29 de octubre llamando a la oficina de información pública del censo 301-763-3691 o enviando un mensaje por correo electrónico a <pio.2010@census.gov>.
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Appendix D: Student Interview Protocol

Protocol G: 

15 randomly selected students

These questions are from the School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)1and Individual Students 

Systems Evaluation Tool (ISSET) 2and stay the same at each wave.

Date:

Interviewer_ID: District_ID: School_ID: 

Introduction (introduction will be repeated for each randomly selected student at each 

wave; no identifiable information will be collected from the respondent): 

Hi, my name is _________ and I work with the MTSS-B Study. We are here to learn more about 

your school. Would you like to answer two questions about your school? 

1) What are the _________________ (school rules, high 5's, 3 bee’s)?

(Define what the acronym means based on information learned in principal interview.)

2) Have you received a ___________________________ since ________________? 

 (reward for appropriate behavior) (2 months ago)

 

1

Sugai et al., 2005 

2 Anderson et al., 2014.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2861 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2861

  To amend the Act of September 30, 1950, to require the Secretary of 
Education to calulate each payment to a local educational agency under 
   section 2 of such Act on the basis of assessed valuation figures 
 provided by the local official responsible for assessing the value of 
  real property located in the jurisdiction of such local educational 
             agency for purposes of levying a property tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 1993

 Mr. Fawell (for himself, Mr. Sangmeister, Mr. Poshard, Mr. Costello, 
and Mr. Hyde) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Act of September 30, 1950, to require the Secretary of 
Education to calulate each payment to a local educational agency under 
   section 2 of such Act on the basis of assessed valuation figures 
 provided by the local official responsible for assessing the value of 
  real property located in the jurisdiction of such local educational 
             agency for purposes of levying a property tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1950.

    Section 2(a) of the Act of September 30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st 
Congress; 20 U.S.C. 237(a)), is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``Such aggregate assessed value of such acquired Federal 
property shall be determined (on the basis of the highest and best use 
of such property as of the time such value is determined), and provided 
to the Secretary, by the local official responsible for assessing the 
value of real property located in the jurisdiction of such local 
educational agency for purposes of levying a property tax.''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1934 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1934

To direct the Administrator of General Services to convey the Clifford 
      P. Hansen Federal Courthouse back to Teton County, Wyoming.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 15, 2014

Mr. Barrasso (for himself and Mr. Enzi) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Administrator of General Services to convey the Clifford 
      P. Hansen Federal Courthouse back to Teton County, Wyoming.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clifford P. Hansen Federal 
Courthouse Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Administrator.--The term ``Administrator'' means the 
        Administrator of General Services.
            (2) County.--The term ``County'' means Teton County, 
        Wyoming.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL COURTHOUSE TO TETON COUNTY, WYOMING.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Administrator shall convey to the County, without consideration, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the building 
and site located at 145 East Simpson Street, Jackson, Wyoming, known as 
the ``Clifford P. Hansen Federal Courthouse''.
    (b) Administrative Costs.--The Secretary shall require the County 
to pay all survey costs and other administrative costs necessary for 
the conveyance required under subsection (a).
    (c) Application of Other Laws.--The conveyance under subsection (a) 
is not subject to the provisions of the McKinney-Vento Homeless 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11301 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
#### Revlon Products Corporation, Plaintiff, *v.*Samuel Bernstein, Doing Business under the Name of Tedburn Co., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 13, 1953.

*81*Klein, Wilder & Gottlieb*for Samuel Bernstein, doing business under the name of Tedburn Co., defendant.

*Blumberg, Miller, Singer & Heffen*for plaintiff.

Steuer, J.

One of the defendants moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a manufacturer of various cosmetics. Plaintiff sells these products direct to retail stores throughout the country. In addition it sells to jobbers under contracts, each contract limiting the jobber to a specific territory and limiting his right of resale to beauty parlors and beauty schools. The moving defendant is a retailer who, knowing of this contract, induced a jobber to sell to him. The action is for damages for inducing a breach of contract and for an injunction.

The grounds of the motion are that the contract is in restraint of trade and consequently illegal. Plaintiff’s first contention, that even if this be the fact the action is maintainable, is erroneous. It is true that a contract which may be avoided by the other party is nevertheless the subject of an action for inducing its breach but this does not apply to a contract void for illegality.

Restraint of trade is a phrase of art in that it is not every contract which can be found to put limits on the flow of merchandise or the prerogatives of buyer or seller that comes within its restriction. In fact, in this very case it is conceded that the restriction embraced in the provision that the jobber may not sell outside his allotted territory does not restrain trade. This concession, made necessary by the established law, does not mean that such a clause does not restrict the jobber and limit him in the disposal of the goods he has bought. It does, but the limitation is of a kind which is recognized not to come within the technical meaning of the words *“*restraint of trade”.

It is well recognized that a manufacturer need not go into competition against himself. If he elects to deal with a certain class of customers personally he can not be required to allow those to whom he sells for distribution to compete with him for those customers. The restriction in this case being in that category it is not in restraint of trade. It is true that examples can be found where either this was not the bona fide purpose of the restriction or where in addition there were other factors which amounted to an unfair restraint and in these instances the contracts were found void. The motion is denied.