alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Roy PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-459.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 8, 1972.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Vera Winter Lee, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

*298PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s conviction of the lesser included offense of assault with intent to commit manslaughter, after a jury verdict of guilty of the offense of assault to commit murder in the first degree, is affirmed, there being no demonstration of error in the record before us. See Sylvester v. State, 46 Fla. 166, 35 So. 142 (1903).

Affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
# C_2012086EN.01000101.xml

| 23.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6494 — Total/Novatek/OAO Yamal LNG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 86/01

On 20 March 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6494. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6494. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2012102EN.01002801.xml

| 5.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/28

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 April 2012

2012/C 102/09

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3142 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 108,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4397 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82850 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8185 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2038 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5730 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,595 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7002 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1548 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3750 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3584 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2785 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3079 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2058 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6136 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6550 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 486,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2735 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2764 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4840 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 029,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0293 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,361 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,6304 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,780 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4060 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8730 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,1420 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3142

JPY

Japanese yen

108,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4397

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82850

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8185

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2038

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5730

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,595

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7002

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1548

RON

Romanian leu

4,3750

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3584

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2785

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3079

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2058

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6136

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6550

KRW

South Korean won

1 486,18

ZAR

South African rand

10,2735

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2764

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4840

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 029,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0293

PHP

Philippine peso

56,361

RUB

Russian rouble

38,6304

THB

Thai baht

40,780

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4060

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8730

INR

Indian rupee

67,1420

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012166EN.01000201.xml

| 12.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 June 2012

2012/C 166/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2544 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,60 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4329 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80770 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8640 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5560 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,395 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,92 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6970 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2953 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4618 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2827 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2602 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2855 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7323 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6217 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6061 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 468,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,4910 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9604 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5445 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 837,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9796 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,871 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,9194 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,689 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5350 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4738 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,9270 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2544

JPY

Japanese yen

99,60

DKK

Danish krone

7,4329

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80770

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8640

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5560

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,395

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,92

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6970

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2953

RON

Romanian leu

4,4618

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2827

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2602

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2855

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7323

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6217

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6061

KRW

South Korean won

1 468,11

ZAR

South African rand

10,4910

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9604

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5445

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 837,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9796

PHP

Philippine peso

53,871

RUB

Russian rouble

40,9194

THB

Thai baht

39,689

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5350

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4738

INR

Indian rupee

69,9270

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:  Fourth Quarter 1994 and 1993 
                                                
(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)        
                                                                         
                     
                                                 Fourth quarter 1994                        Fourth quarter 1993r  
                                                                                
                                                                   
                                        United  North-    Mid-   South    West     United  North-    Mid-   South    West
                                        States    east    West                     States    east    West   
                                                                                               
All housing units........................  100     100     100     100     100        100     100     100     100     100 
                                       
   Year-round vacant.....................  8.4     8.0     6.8     9.7     8.3        8.0     7.1     6.4     9.7     7.6 
     For rent............................  2.6     2.6     2.1     2.8     2.7        2.4     2.4     2.0     2.4     2.8 
     For sale only.......................  1.0     0.9     0.8     1.2     0.9        0.8     0.8     0.7     0.9     0.8 
     Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..  0.7     0.6     0.7     0.6     0.7        0.6     0.5     0.5     0.6     0.7 
     Held off market.....................  4.2     3.8     3.2     5.2     4.0        4.2     3.5     3.2     5.8     3.4 
       For occasional use................  1.5     1.2     0.5     2.0     1.8        1.4     1.0     0.6     2.0     1.5 
       Temporarily occupied by persons                     
       with usual residence elsewhere....  0.7     0.7     0.7     0.8     0.8        0.9     0.7     0.8     1.2     0.7 
       For other reasons.................  2.0     1.9     2.0     2.4     1.4        1.9     1.7     1.8     2.6     1.1 
                                                                    
   Seasonal vacant.......................  2.5     3.3     2.8     2.5     1.5        2.7     3.8     2.7     2.5     2.0 
                                                                    
   Occupied.............................. 89.1    88.7    90.4    87.8    90.2       89.3    89.1    90.9    87.8    90.4 
                                                         
r Revised.                         

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
#### William Claude YOUNG v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 44668.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 8, 1968.

Swep S. Taylor, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

Joe T. Patterson, Atty. Gen., by G. Garland Lyell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Laurence Y. Mellen, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

ETHRIDGE, Chief Justice:

William Claude Young, appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court of Copiah County of obtaining money and property under false pretenses, and was sentenced to serve three years in the state penitentiary. Miss.Code 1942 Ann. § 2149 (1956).

The evidence was ample to sustain the conviction. Young sold a 1966 automobile to Johnson with a bill of sale, and received from him $1,000 in cash and a motor valued at $500. The jury was warranted in finding that Young falsely pretended and represented that the automobile belonged to him, when in fact it did not, and that he obtained the money and property from Johnson by color of such false pretenses.

Appellant asserts that the indictment was defective, because it did not allege the name of the owner of the automobile. (The testimony reflected that it belonged to a motor company in Louisiana, and had been stolen from their lot.) The gravamen of the offense of false pretenses is a false representation of a past or existing fact, made by accused with knowledge of its falsity and with intent to deceive, a reliance thereon, and the obtaining of something of value thereby without compensation. 35 C.J.S. False Pretenses § 6 (1960). Ordinarily, an indictment for obtaining property by false pretenses must *190allege to whom the property obtained belonged. 35 C.J.S. False Pretenses § 44(b) (1960). However, the present case is the converse of that situation. The ownership of the automobile is immaterial. Appellant obtained money and the motor from Johnson by representing that he owned the automobile. It did not belong to appellant, and with knowledge of that fact, he obtained the money and property from the prosecuting witness by falsely representing that he owned it. See State v. Ball, 114 .Miss. 505, 75 So. 373, L.R.A.1917 E, 1046 (1917). For these reasons, the indictment was not defective and the circuit court correctly overruled the demurrer to it.

Affirmed.

JONES, BRADY, INZER and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                               VIDEOSERVER, INC.

     Pursuant to Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law it is
hereby certified that:

     1. The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "corporation") is

                               VideoServer, Inc.

     2. The Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation is hereby amended by
striking out Article FIRST thereof and by substituting in lieu of said Article
the following new Article:

        "Article First:  The name of the Corporation is

                                 Ezenia! Inc."

     3. The amendment of the certificate of incorporation herein certified has
been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

Signed on November 4, 1999.

                                                /s/ Gary J. Kraemer
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name:   Gary J. Kraemer
                                                Title:  VP Finance
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Economic Census Economic Surveys Manufacturing Retail Industries
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS07 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MARCH 28, 2011 Quarterly Financial Report (QFR): Fourth Quarter 2010 The QFR survey has expanded its coverage to include data for corporations in selected service industries and released these new data for the first time on March 28 at 10 a.m. The expanded coverage includes all industry groups in the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) information sector (NAICS 51) and all industry groups in the professional, scientific and technical services sector (NAICS 54), excluding legal services. The new service sector data are part of the QFR's quarterly publication of financial data for corporations in the manufacturing, mining and trade sectors, which has been renamed the Quarterly Financial Report for manufacturing, mining, wholesale trade and selected service industries. Internet address: https://www.census.gov/econ/qfr/.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### G & B OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., d/b/a Four Winds, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF BEVERAGE, Respondent.

No. DD-446.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 21, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1978.

Harry Katz of Katz & Katz, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Charles F. Tunnicliff, Charles T. Collett, Dennis E. LaRosa, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case, though involving a different establishment and different individuals, *to G & B of Jacksonville, Inc., d/b/a Out of Sight v. State of Florida, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage,*Case No. DD-443, Opinion filed August 17, 1978. All of the points involved in this case, except the point relating to sufficiency of the evidence, are identical to points presented in, and resolved by, *959said companion case. As to sufficiency of the evidence, a review of the record reveals it to have been conflicting and contradictory. Under those circumstances it was the prerogative of the hearing officer, in the first instance, to resolve the conflicts and make findings of fact. He did. Those findings were adopted by the agency. We may not reweigh the evidence nor substitute our opinions for those of the hearing officer and agency on conflicting testimony. The record reveals substantial competent evidence, apparently believed by the hearing officer, to support his findings. They will not be disturbed by us.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.35 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, OCT. 27, 2011 2010 Census Summary File 1 National Update New geographic levels, including the U.S., regions, divisions and other areas that cross state boundaries, are now available for the 2010 Census Summary File 1. State and lower-level geographies were released during June through August. The summary file provides a number of detailed tables on age, sex, households, families, relationship to householder, housing units, detailed race and Hispanic or Latino origin groups, and on the population in group quarters. More information on Summary File 1 can be found online at <http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/summary-file-1.html>. Internet address:  
<http://factfinder2.census.gov>. **No news release associated with this product. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Kathryn COOPER, Appellant, v. Warren J. HOWER, Appellee.

No. 73-996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 23, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Jose Gonzalez, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2012377EN.01000301.xml

| 7.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6718 — Toyota Tsusho Corporation/CFAO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 377/02

On 13 November 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6718. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6718. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 21.1



Subsidiaries of Tanner's Restaurant Group, Inc.

1.   Fone.com, Limited, a corporation formed under the laws of England and Wales
2.   Hartan, Inc., a Texas corporation
3.   Harvest Restaurants, Inc., a Texas corporation
4.   Cluckers Restaurants, Inc., a Texas corporation
5.   Harvest Rotisserie on Tezel, Inc., a Texas corporation
6.   Red Lion Food Court, Inc., a Texas corporation

Subsidiaries of Hartan, Inc.

1.   That Chicken Place, Inc., a Georgia corporation
2.   Tanner's/Vinings, Inc., a Georgia corporation
3.   Tanner's Oaks, Inc., a Georgia corporation
4.   Tanner's Spalding, Inc., a Georgia corporation
5.   Tanner's Mill, Inc., a Georgia corporation
6.   Tanner's - Lawrenceville, Inc., a Georgia corporation
7.   Tanner's - Tucker, Inc, a Georgia corporation
8.   Northwest Store, Inc., a Georgia corporation
9.   Tanner's Lilburn, Inc., a Georgia corporation
10.  Tanner's Catering, Inc., a Georgia corporation
11.  Central Administration, Inc., a Georgia corporation
# Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009

APPENDIX A

AQMD Network DepictionsAir Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009A-1Santa ClaritaCrestlineResedaBurbankPasadenaAzusaGlendoraUplandSan BernardinoPomonaFontanaWest Los AngelesLos AngelesRedlandsPico Rivera Mira LomaRubidouxLAX/HastingsLynwood1Mira LomaBanning AirportCompton2La Habra(Jurupa)Palm SpringsAnaheimIndioLong BeachPerrisMission ViejoLake ElsinoreCosta Mesa1Site closed on 10/30/082Site replaced Lynwood 11/05/08Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009A-2Santa ClaritaCrestlineBurbank (C)Upland (C)AzusaGlendora (C)Fontana SanBernardino (C)RedlandsLos Angeles (C)Ontario FSMira LomaLAX/HastingsRubidoux (C) BanningAirportMira LomaPalmNorco (Van Buren) (C)Springs (C)LongBeach(C) AnaheimIndio (C)South LongPerrisBeachLake ElsinoreMission ViejoAir Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009A-3Santa ClaritaCrestlineResedaBurbankPasadenaAzusaGlendoraUplandSan BernardinoPomonaFontanaWest Los AngelesLos AngelesRedlandsPico Rivera Mira LomaRubidouxLAX/HastingsLynwood1RiversideBanning AirportCompton2La Habra Mira Loma PalmSpringsAnaheim(Jurupa)Long BeachLake ElsinoreCosta Mesa1Site closed on 10/30/082Site replaced Lynwood 11/05/08Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009A-4Santa ClaritaResedaBurbankPasadenaAzusaGlendoraUplandSan BernardinoPomonaFontanaWest Los AngelesLos AngelesPico Rivera Mira LomaRubidouxLAX/HastingsLynwood1RiversideCompton2La Habra Mira Loma PalmSpringsAnaheim(Jurupa)Long BeachMission ViejoLake ElsinoreCosta Mesa1Site closed on 10/30/082Site replaced Lynwood 11/05/08Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009A-5BurbankFontanaLos AngelesRubidouxLAX/HastingsLong BeachCosta MesaAir Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009A-6EXIDELos Angeles Upland San BernardinoPico RiveraRubidouxLAX/Hastings Trojan BatteriesLynwood1RiversideCompton2Long BeachLong BeachSouth1Site closed on 10/30/082Site replaced Lynwood 11/05/08Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009A-7Santa Clarita (2)PacoimaBurbank2, (1)Azusa 3 Upland 4, (1)OntarioLAX/Hastings (1)Pico Rivera 2Banning (2)Moreno ValleySNA Costa MesaAir Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009A-8Santa Clarita (B1)Crestline (B1)Reseda (B1)Burbank2(B)Upland (B1) Big BearAzusa1Pasadena Glendora (B1) FontanaSan BernardinoLos Angeles (B)Pico Rivera Ontario Fire StationRubidoux (B)Riverside (B1) Banning (B1)Lynwood4Mira LomaPalmCompton5(Van Buren)2(B)SpringsLong Beach (B)Anaheim (B) IndioMission Lake Elsinore (B1)ViejoTemecula3(B1)1Changed to 1-in-3 on 4/16/092Change to Daily on 4/16/09 for comparison to FEMBAM3Site planned during Fiscal Year 2009/20104Site closed on 10/30/085Site replaced Lynwood on 11/5/08