alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J~SED STq l

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

2 O= 

~yTqt PROj -G~\ 

J U N 1 8 2012 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. J.R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

We received your letter dated June 18, 2012, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 

(EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertification expansion memo the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) 

plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Argonne National Laboratory (ANI.,). 

We concur with CBFO's draft recertification expansion memo will allow ANL to ship Solidified Liquid 

Waste which EPA approved on June 14, 2012, as a Tier 1 change. 

The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH and RH TRU waste are appropriately 

included in Attachment 4 of the draft recertification expansion memo. The waste characterization 

equipment, procedures and processes included in the memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals 

at the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification memo for INI, CCP. If 

you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 

343-9462. 

Sincerely, 

hr~ 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100 % Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Court Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Site Documents, CBFO 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA
EXHIBIT 31.2
       (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures, and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
    Date: August 4, 2008
    /s/ BRIAN C. HENRYBrian C. HenryChief Financial Officer
# C_2011275EN.01000102.xml

| 20.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6372 — OTPP/Macquarie/SFPI-FPIM/The Brussels Airport Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 275/02

On 14 September 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6372. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6372. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
January 12, 2016
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: EXEMPTION REQUEST SECTION 333 OF THE FAA REFORM ACT Amendment Request to add additional Aircraft Dear Sir/Madam,

Amendment to docket no. FAA-2015-1765 Aeroworks Productions, LLC. Would like to add the following aircraft to our original exemption request approved on 10/20/2015.
1. Yuneec Tornado H920 2. Yuneec Typhoon H These sUAS all weigh less than 25 lbs; have a built-in capability to limit the height it flies above the ground, to limit the radius of the distance it flies from the operator and to exclude it from Class B, C and D airspace including a no fly zone feature. Each system also has the failsafe function of the autopilot system, which means when the communication between the Main Controller and the transmitter is lost; the system will automatically trigger Return to Home and will land safely. Additionally, the fact that the Aeroworks Productions LLC pilots hold FAA Pilot certificates demonstrates that they have a high regard to safe operations with an understanding of FARs, pre-flight inspections, maintenance and repair, operations within airspace, as well as being trained to high safety standards. Under the requested exemption, Aeroworks Productions LLC ensures that all operators have completed a small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) education and training program including all applicable regulations and guidance documents; including aeronautical background information such as charts, NOTAMS and Aircraft Circulars, Radio Communications and Procedures, Human Factors and Crew Resource Management, Basic Small UAS Aerodynamics, Weather factors, Airmanship and Decision-making and Safe Operating Procedures.Aeroworks Productions LLC at all times will respect the space and privacy of citizens and property while keeping our skies safe. We respectfully request, without delay, an exemption under Section 333 to enable Aeroworks Productions LLC to operate safe, low-risk commercial sUAV operations for the activities stated.
Sincerely,

Adam S. Andrews Director of Operations Aeroworks Productions, LLC 7740 29 th Ave Kenosha, WI 53143 262-455-5135
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50227 Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENNETH MORRIS THOMPSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(MO-94-CR-89-1)

- - - - - - - - - - November 29, 1995 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kenneth Morris Thompson challenges his conviction on four

counts

-- conspiracy to possess and to distribute cocaine base,

distribution of cocaine base on September 2, 1994, possession with

intent to distribute cocaine base on September 2, 1994, and

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base on September 5,

1994.The district court did not abuse its discretion in overruling

Thompson's objection to the striking of potential jurors pursuant

to Batson v. Kentucky

, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) because the government

articulated race-neutral explanations for each challenged strike.

See Purkett v. Elem

, 115 S. Ct. 1769, 1771 (1995); United States v.

Krout

, 66 F.3d 1420, 1428 (5th Cir. 1995). Also, we conclude that

the district court did not abuse its discretio n when limiting

Thompson's cross-examination of Dodionne Watson. S ee United States

v. Restivo

, 8 F.3d 274, 278 (5th Cir. 1993)

, c ert. denied

, 115

S.Ct. 54 (1994); United States v. Campbell

, 49 F.3d 1079, 1085 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S.Ct. 201 (1995).

The district court did not err in denying Thompson's motion to

suppress. Thompson lacks standing to challenge evidence seized

from a search of his girlfriend's person and the officers had

probable cause to search th e red Hyundai. S ee , United States v.

Wilson , 36 F.3d 1298, 1302 (5th Cir. 1994); Charles v. Smith , 894

F.2d 718, 723 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom , Charles v. Butler

,

498 U.S. 957 (1990).

AFFIRMED.
gdp-ex104_411.htm



Exhibit 10.4

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED 

SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

 

This First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Severance Agreement (as defined below) is made and entered into effective as of this 11th day of October, 2016 by and between Goodrich Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”) and Mark E. Ferchau  (“Ferchau”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Company and Ferchau entered into the Amended and Restated Severance Agreement, effective as of November 5, 2007 (the “Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the Company and Ferchau desire to amend the Agreement to provide that the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and certain of its affiliates will not result in the occurrence of a “Change of Control” under the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants set forth below, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.The following sentence shall be added to the end of definition of Change of Control in the Agreement:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of the Company and certain of its affiliates nor any related or resulting (a) agreements, (b) transactions, (c) issuances or cancelations of debt or equity of the Company or its affiliates, or (d) changes in the composition of the membership of the board of directors of the Company or its affiliates will result in the occurrence of a Change of Control.

2.Except as expressly provided herein, the Agreement and all of its terms and conditions shall remain in full force and effect.




 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Ferchau have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

 

GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Mark E. Ferchau

Name: Mark E. Ferchau

Title: Executive Vice President, Operations

 

 

MARK E. FERCHAU

 

 

 

 

_________________________________________

 

US 4293534v.2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          35,677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,629
<PP&E>                                         383,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,019,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,917
<BONDS>                                        336,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          110,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           366
<OTHER-SE>                                     339,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,019,458
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,223
<CGS>                                          191,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (352)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,027)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,002
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,029)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
AVAQMD Rule 1134 D - 3

Final Staff Report, 03/17/10
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1848

JOHN L. WILSON, JR.; CONSTANCE A. WILSON,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 96-1889

JOHN L. WILSON, JR.; CONSTANCE A. WILSON,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (MISC-96-23-1-T)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 16, 1997
2
3

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John L. Wilson, Jr., Constance A. Wilson, Appellants Pro Se. Gary

R. Allen, Charles Edward Brookhart, Alice Lizbeth Ronk, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's orders granting the

Respondents' motion for summary enforcement of a third party

summons and denying Appellants' motion for a stay of enforcement

pending appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. United

States, No. MISC-96-23-1-T (W.D.N.C. May 29 & June 7, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2011335EN.01000301.xml

| 16.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6263 — Aelia/Aéroports de Paris/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 335/04

On 20 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6263. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6263. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
No. 00-7199.

#### Randall *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11(a)
                                   MIZAR, INC.

                         COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INCOME
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                September 30,
                                                              1997        1996
                                                            -------     -------
<S>                                                         <C>         <C>
PRIMARY INCOME PER SHARE:
  Net income                                                $   315     $   439
                                                            =======     =======

  Weighted average shares outstanding                         5,020       4,966

  Effect of common stock equivalents:
    Options outstanding                                         416         777
    Weighted average exercised options outstanding
     for portion of period, net of equivalent shares
     purchased at average fair market value                     162           -
    Effect of using option proceeds to repurchase
     common stock at average fair market value                 (194)       (164)
                                                            -------     -------
                                                                384         613
                                                            -------     -------
        Total common stock equivalents                        5,404       5,579
                                                            -------     -------

Primary income per share                                    $  0.06     $  0.08
                                                            =======     =======


FULLY DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE:
  Total weighted average shares from above                    5,404       5,579

  Effect of using ending vs. average market price
   for stock option calculations                                 54           -
                                                            -------     -------

        Total common stock equivalents                        5,458       5,579
                                                            -------     -------

Net income                                                  $   315     $   439
                                                            -------     -------

Fully diluted income per share                              $  0.06     $  0.08
                                                            =======     =======
</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Mee Moua

### President and Executive Director, Asian American Justice Center (AAJC)

Mee Moua is the president and executive director of the Asian American Justice Center (AAJC), a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice (Advancing Justice). Ms. Moua will lead AAJC's efforts to promote civic engagement, forge strong and safe communities, create an inclusive society and empower Asian Americans and other underserved communities.

Founded in 1991, AAJC is one of the nation's premier civil rights advocacy organizations and works to advance the human and civil rights of Asian Americans, and build and promote a fair and equitable society for all. Recognized for its expertise on affirmative action, broadband and media diversity, census, voting rights, immigration, immigrant integration and immigrant rights, AAJC accomplishes its goals through policy advocacy, litigation, public education and community building. AAJC has a network of 125 community-based organizations in 29 states and the District of Columbia.

Most recently, Ms. Moua served as vice president of strategic impact initiatives for the Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum (APIAHF), a national health justice organization with offices in San Francisco and Washington, D.C. Based in the nation's capital, Ms. Moua managed APIAHF's divisions on policy analysis, political advocacy, strategic communications, and research, evaluation and analysis. Prior to her position at APIAHF, Ms. Moua was a three-term Minnesota State Senator, where she chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee, and had oversight responsibility for all state agencies in matter related to criminal, civil and administrative law and procedures. Ms. Moua started her legal career in private practice in Minnesota.

Born in Laos, Ms. Moua immigrated to the U.S. in 1978. She attended Brown University as an undergraduate, earned a master's degree in public affairs from the University of Texas-Austin, and a law degree from the University of Minnesota.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned Directors of PHOENIX FOOTWEAR GROUP,
INC., each individually, does hereby constitute and appoint James R. Riedman and Greg W. Slack, and each or any of them, the undersigneds true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with power of substitution, for the undersigned and in the
undersigneds name, place and stead, to execute the Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011, including any and all exhibits, schedules, supplements, certifications and supporting
documents thereto, for the undersigned as Director, to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection therewith.



|                           |  |                      
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|/S/    FREDRICK R.
PORT    |  | Dated: April 14, 2011
|Fredrick R. Port           |  |                      
|                           | 
|/S/    STEVEN M.
DEPERRIOR |  | Dated: April 14, 2011
|Steven M. DePerrior        |  |                      
|                           | 
|/S/    JAMES R.
RIEDMAN    |  | Dated: April 14, 2011
|James R. Riedman           |  |