39410 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Notices 

1See Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2015–2017, 83 FR 15129 

(April 9, 2018) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Preliminary Results, 83 FR at 15130. 

3One of the key measurements of any grade of 

paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter 

the paper the better the contrast between the paper 

and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE 

Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of 

light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest 

reflection, or what would be given to a totally black 

grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. 

‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition 

means a paper with a hue other than white that 

reflects one of the primary colors of magenta, 

yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a 

combination of such primary colors. 

4See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, 

Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, 

and Portugal: Affirmative Final Determination of 

Circumvention of the Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 41610 

(September 1, 2017). 

5 In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined to collapse, and treat as a single entity, 

the mandatory respondent, PT Anugerah Kertas 

Utama, PT Riau Andalan Kertas, and APRIL Fine 

Paper Macao Offshore Limited (collectively, 

APRIL), and its two affiliated parties, PT Sateri 

Viscose International and A P Fine Paper Trading 

(Hong Kong) Limited. The collapsed entity is 

hereinafter collectively referred to as APRIL. See 

Preliminary Results PDM at 3 and 5–6. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–560–828] 

Certain Uncoated Paper From 

Indonesia: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2015–2017 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) continues to find that the 

one subject producer/exporter of subject 

merchandise did not sell certain 

uncoated paper from Indonesia at less 

that normal value during the period of 

review (POR), August 26, 2015, through 

February 28, 2017. No interested party 

submitted comments on the preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable August 9, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Blaine Wiltse or David Crespo, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office II, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6345 or (202) 482–3693, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 9, 2018, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1

Although we invited parties to comment 

on the preliminary results of the 

review,2 no interested party submitted 

comments. Accordingly, no decision 

memorandum accompanies this Federal 

Register notice. Commerce conducted 

this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise under review 

includes uncoated paper in sheet form; 

weighing at least 40 grams per square 

meter but not more than 150 grams per 

square meter; that either is a white 

paper with a GE brightness level 3 of 85 

or higher or is a colored paper; whether 

or not surface-decorated, printed (except 

as described below), embossed, 

perforated, or punched; irrespective of 

the smoothness of the surface; and 

irrespective of dimensions (Certain 

Uncoated Paper). 

Certain Uncoated Paper includes (a) 

uncoated free sheet paper that meets 

this scope definition; (b) uncoated 

ground wood paper produced from 

bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical 

pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope 

definition; and (c) any other uncoated 

paper that meets this scope definition 

regardless of the type of pulp used to 

produce the paper. 

Specifically excluded from the scope 

are (1) paper printed with final content 

of printed text or graphics and (2) lined 

paper products, typically school 

supplies, composed of paper that 

incorporates straight horizontal and/or 

vertical lines that would make the paper 

unsuitable for copying or printing 

purposes. For purposes of this scope 

definition, paper shall be considered 

‘‘printed with final content’’ where at 

least one side of the sheet has printed 

text and/or graphics that cover at least 

five percent of the surface area of the 

entire sheet. 

On September 1, 2017, Commerce 

determined that that imports of 

uncoated paper with a GE brightness of 

83 +/¥ 1% (83 Bright paper), otherwise 

meeting the description of in-scope 

merchandise, constitute merchandise 

‘‘altered in form or appearance in minor 

respects’’ from in-scope merchandise 

that are subject to this order.4

Imports of the subject merchandise 

are provided for under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000, 

4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000, 

4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000, 

4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 

4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000, 

4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some 

imports of subject merchandise may 

also be classified under 4802.62.1000, 

4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 

4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 

4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000, 

4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000, 

4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Analysis 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that the sole mandatory 

respondent, APRIL,5 did not make sales 

of subject merchandise at prices below 

normal value during the POR. As no 

parties commented on the Preliminary 

Results, we are adopting the decisions 

outlined in the PDM in these final 

results of review. For additional details, 

see the PDM, which is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and in the Central 

Records Unit, room B8024 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the PDM 

can be accessed directly on the internet 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. The signed and the 

electronic versions of the PDM are 

identical in content. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we are 

assigning a dumping margin of zero to 

APRIL for the period August 26, 2015, 

through February 28, 2017, as follows: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Notices 39411 

6See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, 

Brazil, Indonesia, the People’s Republic of China, 

and Portugal: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and 

Indonesia and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 

11174 (March 3, 2016). 

1See the petitioner’s Request for Administrative 

Review, dated February 28, 2018. 

2See ASPA’s Request for Administrative Review, 

dated February 27, 2018. 

3See, e.g., Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock 

Company’s submission, ‘‘Request for Review,’’ 

dated February 27, 2018. 

4See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 

16298 (April 16, 2018) (Initiation Notice). 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

PT Anugerah Kertas Utama/PT Riau Andalan Kertas/PT Sateri Viscose International/A P Fine Paper Trading (Hong Kong) Limited/APRIL Fine Paper Macao Offshore Limited (collectively, APRIL) ................................................................................................ 0.00 

Assessment Rates 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Because APRIL’s 

weighted-average dumping margin in 

the final results of this review is zero, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate 

APRIL’s entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. In addition, for 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by APRIL for which 

it did not know its merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company or 

companies involved in the transaction. 

The all-others rate is 2.10 percent.6 We 

will also instruct CBP to take into 

account the ‘‘provisional measures cap’’ 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(d). 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of these 

final results of review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for APRIL will be 

zero; (2) for previously-investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, or the 

original less-than-fair value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent segment 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 2.10 

percent, the all-others rate made 

effective by the LTFV investigation. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility, under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 

sections 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: August 6, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17066 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2017–2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative review, in part, of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) 

for the period February 1, 2017, through 

January 31, 2018. 

DATES: Applicable August 9, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 16, 2018, based on timely 

requests for review for 94 companies by 

Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action 

Committee (the petitioner),1 97 

companies by the American Shrimp 

Processors Association (ASPA),2 and by 

various Vietnamese companies,3

Commerce published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from Vietnam 

covering the period February 1, 2017, 

through January 31, 2018.4

On July 11, 2018, Soc Trang Seafood 

Joint Stock Company withdrew its 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES