alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### INDUSTRIAL GUNITE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITIES SERVICE OIL CO. et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 4184.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 30, 1973.

Camp, Carmouche, Palmer, Carwile & Barsh by Karl E. Boellert, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant.

Scofield, Bergstedt & Gerard by Robert L. Dow, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellees.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOYj and DOMEN-GEAUX, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Refractory Construction, Inc. v. Cities Service Oil Company, et al., 278 So.2d 510 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1973) our docket number 4183, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mandeep K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mandeep K. Taneja                
|Mandeep K. Taneja                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|March 14, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10.1(z)

                                    AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                           1999 SAUER INC. BONUS PLAN

         1. Article V of the 1999 Sauer Inc. Bonus Plan (the "Plan") provides
that it may be amended by action of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors ("Compensation Committee") of Sauer Inc. (the "Company"). In
accordance with the provisions of that paragraph and pursuant to resolutions
duly adopted by the Compensation Committee, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows:

         Paragraphs 1. and 2. of Article I are deleted in their entirety and the
following are substituted in place thereof:

              1.           The "Plan" means this 1999 Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Bonus
                     Plan with all amendments and supplements hereafter made.

              2.           The "Company" means Sauer-Danfoss Inc., a Delaware
                     stock corporation, its successors, and the surviving
                     companies or corporations resulting from any merger
                     or consolidation of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. with any other
                     corporation or partnership.

         2. The changes made by this Amendment shall be subject to, and
effective upon, the completion of the combination of the fluid power business of
Danfoss A/S and the Company.

                                                 The above Amendment was
                                                 duly adopted by resolutions
                                                 passed by the Compensation
                                                 Committee of the Board of
                                                 Directors of the Company at
                                                 its meeting held on
                                                 March 3, 2000



                                                 ----------------------------
                                                 Johannes Kirchhoff, Chairman
                                                 Compensation Committee
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

Appendix D: Cost Effectiveness Analysis December 15, 2011 

Final Staff Report with Appendices for 

Revised Proposed Amendments to Rule 4682 

D - 1

APPENDIX D 

Cost Effectiveness Analysis for 

Permanent Total Enclosure/Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer System 

in a Cup Molding Facility 

December 15, 2011 
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

Appendix D: Cost Effectiveness Analysis December 15, 2011 

Final Staff Report with Appendices for 

 Revised Proposed Amendments to Rule 4682 

D - 2

This page intentionally blank. 

 
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

Appendix D: Cost Effectiveness Analysis 

 Final Staff Rep

 Revised Proposed Ame

D - 3

 Determination of Capital & Operating Cost (using EPA OAQPS Guidelines)

Production Area Emissions w/ PTE w/o AC; 120,000 cfm  23.3 TPY

CAPITAL COST

Direct Cost Cost Direct Operating Cost of RTO 

Purchased Equipment - Total A = 1.00 $1,250,000 Operating LaborCapture equipment cost (building mods & ducts) $250,000 rate ($/hr) 15Control equipment cost- RTO from EPA's tech sheet $1,000,000 hrs/day = 4Taxes A*.04 $50,000 days/wk = 7 Freight A*.05 $62,500 SupervisionSubtotal B= 1.18 $1,362,500 15 % of operating labor 

Maintenance

Direct Installation labor; $15/hr * 4 hr/day * 360 day/yr 

Foundations & Supports B*.08 $109,000 materials = 5 % cap 

Erection & Installation B*.14 $190,750 UtilitiesElectrical Wiring B*.04 $54,500 electric & gas from budget quote Subtotal $354,250 Subtotal Indirect Cost Indirect Operating Cost (fixed) Engineering & Supervision B*.10 $136,250 Overhead (60 % of operating, supervision, and maintena

Construction Fees B*.10 $136,250 Property tax (1 % of total capital investment (TCI) ) 

Startup B*.02 $27,250 Insurance (1 % of TCI) Performance Testing B*.01 $13,625 Administration (2 % of TCI) 

Contingencies B*.03 $40,875 Capital recovery (Capital Recovery Factor * TCI) 

Subtotal $354,250 Subtotal 

TOTAL CAPITAL COST = $2,071,000 TOTAL ANNUALIZED COST = 

cost /ton = $58,997
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

Appendix D: Cost Effectiveness Analysis December 15, 2011 

 

 Final Staff Report with Appendices for 

Revised Proposed Amendments to Rule 4682 

D - 4

This page intentionally blank.
TOKIOMARINE 

NICHIDO 

March 8,2010 r • n f'-. j • ;rnnTiy;A) 

- ••: 1 '•-/'• ••• •;. :_'J i ;'/•; ! iU:' i 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary . ^ ^ 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and 

Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in 

reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by 

U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and 

Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's 

financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. 

American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angles - both vital focal points of business, 

trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing unsurpassed air service since the 

mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from 

these proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need 

your help to make the JFK/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly from 

Kennedy to Haneda! 

Sincerely, 

HayatoJso|a i' 

''Chief Executive Officer 

/ -

Tokio Marine Management Inc. 

U.S. Manager and/or Manager for Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (U.S. Branch) 

Trans Pacific Insurance Company, TM Casualty Insurance Company, TNUS Insurance Company 

230 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10169 

Phone-. (212) 297-6600, Main Fax; (212) 297-6062, Claims Fax: (212) 297-6064 

TOKIO 

MARINE
Date 4/8/11 Page of 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Summary Page 

Updated based on Post-Focus Draft Revision1, 3/31/2011, 

Test Data Review Engineering Report. 

Chemical ID: P-11-0098 Reviewer: Kwon 

Endpoints-Assessed Table 

Endpoints/Assessment 

Cycles1

Releases 

Assessed 

in 

NCEM2? 

Reasons for not assessing releases 

No XB 

Testing 

Required 

No 

Hazard 

Concern 

No 

Releases 

Release 

Below 

Acute 

Threshold5

Release 

Below 

Chronic 

Threshold5

Other 

Ingestion 

 Surface water 

 Ground water (landfill) 

 Consumer Use: DtD2

Inhalation 

 Air: incineration (stack) 

 Air: fugitive 

 Consumer Use: CEM3

Dermal 

 Consumer Use: CEM 

Eco 

 Surface water: ADR 

conc and/or PDM4

 Consumer Use: DtD

1

Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model. 2

Down-the-Drain 

3

Consumer Exposure Model 

4

Probabilistic Dilution Model 

5

The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses. 

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure 

assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch=s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report). 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 1
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases African American Business Ownership
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-R.16 **Contact:**  Briana Kaya Public Information Office
301-763-3030/3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, FEB. 8, 2011 Census Bureau Reports a 71 Percent Increase in the Number of Black-Owned Businesses in the Detroit Metro Area The number of black-owned businesses in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., metropolitan statistical area increased to 53,380 in 2007 from 31,208 in 2002, a 71.0 percent increase, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today. Over the same period, receipts generated by these businesses increased 16.9 percent to $3.7 billion. Nationally, the number of black-owned businesses rose to 1.9 million, a 60.5 percent increase, and sales by these businesses increased to $137.5 billion, a 55.1 percent increase. Industries in the metro area with the largest number of black-owned businesses included repair, maintenance, personal, and laundry services (14,199 businesses); health care and social assistance (13,662 businesses); and administrative and support and waste management and remediation services (5,569 businesses). These new data come from the 2007 Survey of Business Owners, which is part of the 
2007 Economic Census. This survey provides detailed information every five years for black-owned businesses, including the number of firms, sales and receipts, number of paid employees and annual payroll for states, counties, cities and metropolitan areas.  The Survey of Business Owners is conducted every five years as part of the economic census. The 2007 survey collected data from a sample of more than 2.3 million businesses. Data collected in a sample survey are subject to sampling variability, as well as nonsampling errors. Sources of nonsampling errors include errors of response, nonreporting and coverage. More details concerning the SBO survey design, methodology and data limitations can be found at <https://www.census.gov/econ/sbo/methodology.html>. Editor’s note: The data can be accessed at https://www.census.gov/econ/sbo/.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Cox Communications, Inc. (the Company)
for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of
the date hereof, I, James O. Robbins, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ James O. RobbinsName: James O. RobbinsTitle: President and ChiefExecutive OfficerDate: March 16, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other documentation
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Cox Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Cox Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of Cox Communications, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the annual
report on Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Mayumi Escalante

### Supervisory Survey Statistician for Commodity Analysis Branch, Foreign Trade Division

Mayumi Escalante works in the Census Bureau's Foreign Trade Division on commodity analysis and classification. As Classification Area supervisor, she was responsible for coordinating nearly 18,000 Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers for U.S. imports and 9,000 Schedule B export codes with other domestic and international classification systems. She works to ensure the quality of the trade statistics in her current role as supervisor for the Foods and Textiles commodity sections. Ms. Escalante earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the University of Maryland and a Master's Certificate in Project Management from The George Washington University.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases2010 Census

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB13-TPS.91**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office301-763-3030

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, SEPT. 26, 2013

## U.S. Island Areas: 2010 Census Detailed Crosstabulations (Part 2)

This file contains 2010 Census data showing crosstabulations of demographic, social and economic characteristics for the U.S. Island Areas, which include American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands. These characteristics are crosstabulated by place of birth, educational attainment, labor force status, occupation, industry, income and earnings.

The detailed crosstabulations (Part 2) can be accessed directly from the following links:American SamoaCommonwealth of the Northern Mariana IslandsGuamU.S. Virgin Islands

Part 1 — featuring crosstabulations by age, sex, ethnic origin or race — were released in July. For more information about 2010 Census products for the U.S. Island Areas, please visit the online press kit.

**No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1922 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prevent the illegal trafficking of supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits by requiring 

all program beneficiaries to show valid photo identification when purchasing items with program benefits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 14, 2014 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prevent 

the illegal trafficking of supplemental nutrition assistance 

program benefits by requiring all program beneficiaries 

to show valid photo identification when purchasing items 

with program benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Stamp Fraud 

5 Prevention and Accountability Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1922 IS

1 SEC. 2. PHOTO IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. 

2 (a) DISQUALIFICATION FOR USING ANOTHER EBT 

3 CARD.—Section 6 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

4 (7 U.S.C. 2015) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(r) DISQUALIFICATION FOR USING ANOTHER EBT 

7 CARD.—Subject to any requirements established by the 

8 Secretary, any person who has been found by a State or 

9 Federal court or administrative agency in a hearing under 

10 subsection (b) to have intentionally used an EBT card 

11 that was issued to a household of which the person is not 

12 a member shall be ineligible for benefits under this Act.’’. 

13 (b) OPTIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION.— 

14 Section 7(h)(9) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

15 (7 U.S.C. 2016(h)(9)) is amended by adding at the end 

16 the following: 

17 ‘‘(C) LISTED BENEFICIARIES.— 

18 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—If a State agency 

19 elects not to require that an EBT card 

20 contain a photograph described in subpara21 graph (A), the State agency shall list on 

22 the EBT card the name of each member of 

23 the household who may use the card. 

24 ‘‘(ii) PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION

25 REQUIRED.—A member of a household 

26 with an EBT card issued by a State agenVerDate Mar 15 2010 07:18 Jan 16, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1922.IS S1922

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1922 IS

1 cy described in clause (i) shall be required 

2 to show photographic identification at the 

3 point of sale when using the EBT card.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Salwa A. ABODEELY and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a foreign corporation, Appellants, v. Mary Ela LACOCK, Executrix of the Estate of Ellen H. Carter Orphan, Deceased, Appellees.

No. 73-859.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 24, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Quinten Skipwith, Individually and Doing Business as “Red’s Taxi”, Plaintiff, *v.*Hattie M. Collins et al., Defendants.

County Court, Orange County,

January 22, 1953.

*514
      *Frank Cline*for Hattie M. Collins, defendant, appearing specially.

*Thomas F. Herbert*for plaintiff.

Egan, J.

This is a motion by the attorneys for the defendants herein, appearing specially for the motion, for an order pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice dismissing the complaint herein on the ground that the court has not jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, Hattie M. Collins.

The action is an action to recover damages for the negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant which allegedly caused certain damage to an automobile owned by the plaintiff.

The defendant is a resident of the State of Texas and was served in this action pursuant to section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law by serving the Secretary of State and mailing a copy of the summons and complaint by registered mail to her address in Stockdale, Texas.

The defendant contends that as the jurisdiction of the County Court is limited to a cause in which all of the defendants reside within the county or have a place of business therein and she is a nonresident of the State, such service was illegal; that if she were physically present in New York State and not a resident of Orange County nor having a place of business therein, the County Court could not acquire jurisdiction of her person.

Section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law provides that service of the complaint pursuant to that section *“*shall be of the same legal force and validity as if served on him personally within the state and within the territorial jurisdiction of the court from which the summons issues.”

The basis upon which section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was founded was that nonresident users of our highways impliedly consent to conform and be amenable to our laws. It was designed to simplify the procedure in matters of this particular kind.

The motion is denied.