Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39673 

12See 19 CFR 351.310. 

13See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

1See the Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades 

and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently with and 

hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

2See the February 9, 2018, no-shipment letter 

from Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., 

Ltd., and the February 12, 2018, no-shipment letters 

from Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd., 

Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Jiangsu 

Huachang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shanghai 

Starcraft Tools Company Limited, and Wuhan 

Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

3See the CBP message numbers 8129311– 

8129313 dated May 9, 2018, and 8130301–8130303 

dated May 10, 2018, available at http://

adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb/. 

4See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4 

for a detailed discussion. 

5See, e.g., Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final 

Rescission, In Part, of Administrative Review and 

Final Results of New Shipper Review; 2013, 80 FR 

34619 (June 17, 2015). 

6See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4–8, 

for more details. 

7 Id. at 8. 

name, address, and telephone number, 

the number of participants, whether any 

participant is a foreign national, and a 

list of the issues to be discussed. If a 

request for a hearing is made, Commerce 

will inform parties of the scheduled 

date of the hearing which will be held 

at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230, at a time and 

date to be determined.12 Issues 

addressed during the hearing will be 

limited to those raised in the briefs.13

Parties should confirm by telephone the 

date, time, and location of the hearing 

two days before the scheduled date. 

Parties are reminded that all briefs 

and hearing requests must be filed 

electronically using ACCESS and 

received successfully in their entirety by 

5 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of our analysis of 

the issues raised by the parties in their 

comments, within 120 days after 

publication of these preliminary results. 

This administrative review and notice 

are in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: August 3, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Period of Review 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Rescission of the 2015–2016 

Administrative Review, in Part 

VI. Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, 

in Part 

VII. Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

VIII. Subsidies Valuation Information 

IX. Analysis of Programs 

X. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–17156 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–900] 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 

2017 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

certain companies covered by this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value. 

DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yang Jin Chun or Joshua Poole, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–1293, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on diamond 

sawblades and parts thereof (diamond 

sawblades) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China). The period of review 

(POR) is November 1, 2016, through 

October 31, 2017. Commerce has 

preliminarily determined that certain 

companies covered by this review made 

sales of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is diamond sawblades and parts thereof. 

The diamond sawblades subject to the 

order are currently classifiable under 

subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS), and may also 

enter under 6804.21.00. While the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description is dispositive. A full 

description of the scope of the order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.1

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Six companies that received a 

separate rate in previous segments of the 

proceeding and are subject to this 

review reported that they did not have 

any exports of subject merchandise 

during the POR.2 We requested that U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

report any contrary information.3 To 

date, we have not received any contrary 

information from either CBP in response 

to our inquiry or any other sources that 

these companies had any shipments of 

the subject merchandise sold to the 

United States during the POR.4 Further, 

consistent with our practice, we find 

that it is not appropriate to rescind the 

review with respect to these companies 

but, rather, to complete the review and 

issue appropriate instructions to CBP 

based on the final results of review.5

Separate Rates 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that 14 respondents are eligible to 

receive separate rates in this review.6

Separate Rates for Eligible NonSelected Respondents 

Because we denied the separate rate 

eligibility for the two respondents 

selected for individual examination, 

Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Danyang 

Huachang) and Jiangsu Youhe Tool 

Manufacturer Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Youhe), 

and treated them as part of the Chinawide entity, we preliminarily applied to 

non-selected respondents the separate 

rate assigned to eligible respondents in 

the last completed administrative 

review, which is 82.05 percent.7

China-Wide Entity 

Under Commerce’s current policy 

regarding the conditional review of the 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
39674 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 

8See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

9See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China; Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8, 2015). 

10See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 

1329, 1331–32 (January 11, 2018) (‘‘All firms listed 

below that wish to qualify for separate rate status 

in the administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as appropriate, either a 

separate rate application or certification, as 

described below.’’). Companies that are subject to 

this administrative review that are considered to be 

part of the China-wide entity are ASHINE Diamond 

Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., 

Ltd., Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., 

Danyang Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd., 

Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd., 

Hebei XMF Tools Group Co., Ltd., Henan Huanghe 

Whirlwind Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Hao Xin 

International Group Limited, Hubei Changjiang 

Precision Engineering Materials Technology Co., 

Ltd., Hubei ShengBaiRui Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., 

Orient Gain International Limited, Pantos Logistics 

(HK) Company Limited, Pujiang Talent Diamond 

Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools 

Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., 

Ltd., Sino Tools Co., Ltd., Wuhan Baiyi Diamond 

Tools Co., Ltd., Wuhan Sadia Trading Co., Ltd., and 

Wuhan ZhaoHua Technology Co., Ltd. See 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 8–9. In 

addition, Danyang Huachang, Jiangsu Youhe, and 

Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., are 

preliminarily treated as part of the China-wide 

entity. Id. at 6, 9. 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 

12See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 

13See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

14See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

China-wide entity,8 the China-wide 

entity will not be under review unless 

a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity in this 

review, the entity is not under review 

and the entity’s rate is not subject to 

change (i.e., 82.05 percent).9 Aside from 

the no-shipments and separate rate 

companies discussed above, Commerce 

considers all other companies for which 

a review was requested (which did not 

file a separate rate application) to be 

part of the China-wide entity.10

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). For Danyang Huachang and 

Jiangsu Youhe, we denied the separate 

rate eligibility and treated them as part 

of the China-wide entity. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room B8024 of the main Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following weighted-average 

dumping margins exist: 

Exporter Margin 

(percent) 

Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Henan Huanghe Whirlwind International Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity .............................................................................................................................................................. 82.05 

Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation .............................................................................................................................................. 82.05 

Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 82.05 

Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. 82.05 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce discloses to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with a 

preliminary results of review within five 

days after public announcement of the 

preliminary results of review in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Because Commerce preliminarily 

denied the separate rate eligibility for 

the two respondents selected for 

individual examination and treated 

them as part of the China-wide entity, 

there are no calculations to disclose. 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of these preliminary results 

of review.11 Parties who submit case 

briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.12 Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

issues raised in the case briefs, may be 

filed no later than five days after the 

cases briefs are filed.13

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, filed 

electronically using ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time within 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.14

Hearing requests should contain (1) the 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number; (2) the number of participants; 

and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 

Issues raised in the hearing will be 

limited to those raised in the respective 

case briefs. Unless extended, Commerce 

intends to issue the final results of this 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of issues raised by parties in 

their comments, within 120 days after 

the publication of these preliminary 

results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results of 

review, Commerce will determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39675 

15See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

16See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011). 

1PT Enterprise, Unicatch, and Mid Continent 

Steel & Wire, Inc. (Mid Continent), a domestic 

producer and interested party, requested the instant 

administrative review. See PT July 31, 2017 Request 

for Administrative Review; Unicatch July 31, 2017 

Request for Administrative Review; Mid Continent 

July 31, 2017 Request for Administrative Reviews. 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 

42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the 

Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated 

January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of 

the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from 

Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated March 22, 2018 (First Prelim 

Extension). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from 

Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated July 12, 2018 (Second Prelim 

Extension). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Steel Nails from 

Taiwan; 2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

all appropriate entries covered by this 

review.15 If the preliminary results are 

unchanged for the final results, we will 

instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment rate of 82.05 percent to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR which were exported by the 

non-selected respondents eligible for a 

separate rate. If Commerce determines 

that an exporter under review had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries that entered 

under that exporter’s case number (i.e., 

at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated 

at the China-wide rate.16 Commerce 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of the final results of 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject 

merchandise exported by the companies 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will be that established 

in the final results of review (except, if 

the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero 

cash deposit will be required); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that received a separate rate 

in a prior segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for 

all Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter that 

supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: August 6, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

A. Non-Market Economy Country Status 

B. Separate Rates 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–17065 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–854] 

Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Partial 

Rescission of Administrative Review; 

2016–2017 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that Bonuts Logistics Co., LLC made 

U.S. sales of subject merchandise below 

normal value. Commerce preliminarily 

determines that Unicatch Industrial Co. 

Ltd., PT Enterprise, Inc. and its 

affiliated producer Pro-Team Coil Nail 

Enterprise, Inc. did not make U.S. sales 

of subject merchandise below normal 

value. We are rescinding the review 

with respect to 92 companies for which 

the request for review was timely 

withdrawn. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Hoefke or Chelsey Simonovich, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4947 or 

(202) 482–1979, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain steel 

nails from Taiwan. The period of review 

(POR) is July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017. 

This review covers Bonuts Logistics Co., 

LLC (Bonuts); PT Enterprise, Inc. (PT 

Enterprise) and its affiliated producer 

Pro-Team Coil Nail Enterprise, Inc. (ProTeam) (collectively, PT); and Unicatch 

Industrial Co. Ltd. (Unicatch). 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of this administrative review 1

on September 13, 2017.2 The 

preliminary results are listed below in 

the section titled ‘‘Preliminary Results 

of Review.’’ 

On January 23, 2018, Commerce 

exercised its discretion to toll all 

deadlines for the duration of the closure 

of the Federal Government from January 

20, 2018, through January 22, 2018.3 On 

March 22, 2018, we extended the 

deadline for the preliminary results to 

July 16, 2018.4 On July 12, 2018, we 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results to August 3, 2018.5

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.6


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES