alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013208EN.01000301.xml

| 23.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 July 2013

2013/C 208/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3166 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4579 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85900 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5577 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2370 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8230 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,976 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 293,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7025 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2175 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4216 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5244 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4272 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3618 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2143 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6600 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6618 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 472,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,9458 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0856 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5095 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 251,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1873 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,876 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,5430 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,762 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9497 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4786 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,6320 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3166

JPY

Japanese yen

131,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4579

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85900

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5577

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2370

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8230

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,976

HUF

Hungarian forint

293,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7025

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2175

RON

Romanian leu

4,4216

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5244

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4272

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3618

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2143

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6600

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6618

KRW

South Korean won

1 472,90

ZAR

South African rand

12,9458

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0856

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5095

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 251,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1873

PHP

Philippine peso

56,876

RUB

Russian rouble

42,5430

THB

Thai baht

40,762

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9497

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4786

INR

Indian rupee

78,6320

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Craig R. Neish, Respondent.

[722 NYS2d 815]

Rose, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered April 13, 2000, which classified defendant as a risk level I sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

In December 1999, defendant was convicted on his plea of guilty to one count of sexual abuse in the first degree arising out of sexual contact with his five-year-old daughter, and he was subsequently sentenced to a six-month jail term and five years of probation. In April 2000, a risk assessment hearing was held pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]). At the hearing, the prosecution requested an opportunity to be heard in order to argue that defendant should be assessed a level II risk for a repeat sex offense. County Court permitted the prosecution to place its position on the record but then denied its request and determined defendant to be risk level I sex offender. The prosecution appeals.

While we agree with the prosecution’s contention that SORA was amended prior to defendant’s risk assessment hearing to, *inter alia,*afford the District Attorney the right to be heard in determining the risk level to be assigned *(see,*L 1999, ch 453, § 6 [eff Jan. 1, 2000]), we hold nevertheless that County Court did not err by denying the request or by assessing defendant as a risk level I. Rather, we are persuaded that the prosecution’s right to be heard was waived by its failure to provide the court and defendant with prior notice of the assessment sought, and that County Court’s determination of defendant’s risk level has a substantial basis in the record.

As amended, SORA imposes on the prosecution the burden of proving the basis for a requested assessment by clear and convincing evidence. More to the point, it requires that the offender be afforded a prior written statement of the assessment sought by the prosecution and the reasons for seeking it *(see,*Correction Law § 168-d [3]). Without such notice, the offender’s opportunity to be heard in response, which SORA expressly recognizes, cannot be a meaningful one *(see, e.g., Mathews v Eldridge,*424 US 319, 348-349). As this due process prerequisite was not satisfied here, the prosecution’s request was properly denied. Moreover, the record shows that the prosecution requested to be heard not in order to present relevant evidence, but only to argue that defendant’s failure to accept *818responsibility for his crime was demonstrated by evidence already before County Court. County Court heard this contention by permitting a recitation of the aggravating circumstances supporting the prosecution’s recommendation of a level II assessment. We conclude that County Court’s finding as to defendant’s acceptance of responsibility for his offense is supported by his full allocution to the crime charged and the terms of the negotiated plea agreement.

Mercure, J. P., Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
# C_2013244EN.01000301.xml

| 24.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6973 — Axa PE/Fosun/Club Méditerranée)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 244/02

On 19 August 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6973. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6973. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### David Lee EDMONDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 71-96—71-100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### EAGAN v. JOHNNY’S WELDING SHOP.

No. 38501.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 9, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned Directors of PHOENIX FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC. do hereby constitute
and appoint James R. Riedman and Kenneth E. Wolf their true and lawful attorneys and agents, to execute the Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006, for us and in our names as
Directors, to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection therewith.



|                                         |  |                     
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|                                         | 
|/S/    FREDRICK
PORT Fredrick Port       |  | Dated: April 5, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    STEVEN
DEPERRIOR Steven DePerrior |  | Dated: April 5, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    GREGORY
HARDEN Gregory Harden     |  | Dated: April 5, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    JAMES R.
RIEDMAN James R. Riedman |  | Dated: April 5, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    WILHELM
PFANDER Wilhelm Pfander   |  | Dated: April 5, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    JOHN
KRATZER John Kratzer         |  | Dated: April 5, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    ROBERT
GUNST Robert Gunst         |  | Dated: April 5, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    JOHN
ROBBINS John Robbins         |  | Dated: April 5, 2007
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB09-CN.27 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, OCT. 26, 2009 Census Bureau Launches 2010 Census Campaign With New Web Site The U.S. Census Bureau today kicked off its communications campaign to reach every resident in America with the launch of its 2010 Census Web site, 2010CENSUS.GOV. The Web site will serve as a platform for a national dialogue about how the census develops a "Portrait of America." 2010CENSUS.GOV features an animated marquee that symbolizes the Census Bureau's place at the intersection of the American experience. By clicking on images representative of the population, visitors can view video vignettes that ease fears about the census and encourage participation in the once-a-decade population count. The marquee will evolve over time, bringing the diverse voices of America to the site. "2010CENSUS.GOV puts the census in the hands of the public," said U.S. Census Bureau Director Robert M. Groves. "You can find out when you will get the form, and how to fill it out and mail it back. The site also provides a substantial amount of information regarding our commitment to privacy and confidentiality." Inside the site, the director's blog will offer a look at census efforts nationwide. Comments will be enabled so that readers can share their thoughts and participate in the conversation. As they go live, social media sites and tools will provide additional opportunities for the public to get involved. Site features include an interactive census form that provides a history and explanation for each of the 10 questions. This form is one of the shortest in history and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. In order to track census progress and motivate localities, the site will include next year a map widget that displays interactive mail back response rates. The Web site also demonstrates the Census Bureau's commitment to reaching traditionally hard-to-count populations. In mid-November, a one-page destination about the census will be available on the site in 59 languages. In addition, users will be able to download an in-language guide about how to answer the form. By the end of 2009, the entire site will be presented in Spanish.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2882

To amend section 615(e) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

to limit the award of attorneys’ fees under the section to fees incurred

for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of a civil

action.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1993

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend section 615(e) of the Individuals with Disabilities

Education Act to limit the award of attorneys’ fees under

the section to fees incurred for or in connection with

the commencement and prosecution of a civil action.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES.

4 Section 615(e)(4) of the Individuals with Disabilities

5 Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1415(e)(4)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting

7 the following:
2

•HR 2882 IH

1 ‘‘(B) In any civil action brought in a State court or

2 in a district court of the United States under this sub3 section, the court, in its discretion, may award reasonable

4 attorneys’ fees incurred for or in connection with the com5 mencement and prosecution of the civil action as part of

6 the costs to the parents or guardian of a child or youth

7 with a disability who is the prevailing party.’’;

8 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘action or

9 proceeding’’ and inserting ‘‘civil action’’;

10 (3) in subparagraph (4)(D)—

11 (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by

12 striking ‘‘action or proceeding’’ and inserting

13 ‘‘civil action’’;

14 (B) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘Procedure

15 or,’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘Proce16 dure.’’; and

17 (C) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘or adminis18 trative officer’’;

19 (4) in clauses (i) and (iii) of subparagraph (F),

20 by striking ‘‘action or proceeding,’’ and inserting

21 ‘‘civil action,’’; and

22 (5) in subparagraph (G), by striking ‘‘action or

23 proceeding’’ and inserting ‘‘civil action’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5


<CAPTION>

                                                           EXHIBIT 27 (a)

                Crown Central Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries
                           Financial Data Schedule
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                     Year ended
                                                    December 31, 1999
                                                    -----------------
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                $    9,652
<SECURITIES>                                               2,795
<RECEIVABLES>                                            104,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                                (552)
<INVENTORY>                                               69,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         187,402
<PP&E>                                                   690,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                           376,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           523,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    202,525
<BONDS>                                                  129,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  50,356
<OTHER-SE>                                                98,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             523,108
<SALES>                                                1,270,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,270,181
<CGS>                                                  1,164,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,164,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         138,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        15,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (44,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (14,675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (30,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (30,026)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (3.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (3.04)



</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7981** 

RICHARD PRICE TUCKER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CHAPLAIN RUSSELL HELBIG, sued in his personal

- individual capacity and in his official capacity for injunctive relief , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson
. Richard M
. Gergel , District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 00401

- RMG )

Submitted : April 9, 2014 Decided: April 18, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Richard Price Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appell ee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard Price Tucker appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), based on his failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the d istrict court. See Tucker v. Helbig , No. 8:13

- cv - 00401

- RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Business Ownership Women
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-100 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JUNE 2, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Webinar to Highlight Company Summary on Women-, Veteran- and Minority-Owned Businesses The U.S. Census Bureau will hold an audio news conference to release data for all business groups cross-tabulated by gender, ethnicity, race and veteran status of owners. Separate data estimates are provided for minority-, and nonminority-owned businesses and those owned equally by minorities and nonminorities. The data cover employer and nonemployer firms and include sales and receipts, annual payroll and employment for 2007. Data are classified by industry, geography, employment and receipts size. The event will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. There will be no physical event associated with this conference. Information on accessing the online presentation is provided below. Reporters will be able to ask questions once the data presentation is complete. We suggest reporters log in and call in early.
    
  **Audio conference — access information**
    Toll free number: 800-779-9312
    Participant passcode: CENSUS**Note: Stay on the line until operator asks for the passcode. Do not key in passcode.** **Online presentation — access information
  Please login early, as some setup is required.**
  URL: <https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/> 
  Conference/meeting number: PW5025465
  Conference/meeting passcode: CENSUS If closed captioning is required:
<http://livewrite.nccsite.com/view/cb0607>
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Raymond CLOUD, Appellant, v. SHELBY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF SHELBY, OHIO, Appellee.

No. 69-893.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 19, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Order entered January 30, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00424-CR

JOHNELLE RENEE HALL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA17-13792-L

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated the appeal for a hearing to determine why no brief has been filed. On January 

29, 2019, the supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing was filed. We ADOPT the trial 

court’s January 23, 2019 findings that (1) appellant wishes to prosecute this appeal; (2) appellant, 

who is indigent, is represented by appointed counsel Jeff P. Buchwald; and (3) counsel has not 

abandoned the appeal and will have a brief filed within 25 days.

We ORDER appellant’s brief filed no later than February 19, 2019.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Etta Mullin, 

Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court No. 10; Jeff Buchwald; and to the Dallas County 

District Attorney.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### Clair M. ETTINGER, Appellant, v. Phillip ETTINGER, Appellee.

No. 71-1055.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 8, 1972.

Sinclair, Louis, Sand & Siegel, and Frank Nussbaum, Miami, for appellant.

Burton R. Levey, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Folmar v. Davis, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 772.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Paul R. Arena, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of i2 Telecom International, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 15, 2006



/S/ Paul R. ArenaPaul R. Arena,Chairman of the Board,Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer