alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C 

### MA R 

### - 6 201 2



# "FARIN G DOCKE T I n th e Matte ro f Wester n Tir e Equipmen t an d Suppl y Co. , Inc. , Respondent . FA A Docke t No . no t assigne d FDM S No. : FAA 2011-129 1 FA A Region : Wester n Pacifi c Judge : Richar dC . Goodwi n v ^MOTIONT O WITHDRAW-GOMPLAINT

U To ; Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n andRespondent ; ^ The Regiona l Counse l fo

r th e Western-Pacifi c Region , Federal Aviatio n ^ ' Administratio n (FAA ) throug h counsel , hereb y files thi s Motio n fo r Withdrawal o f

th e Complain t

andseek s dismissa l o f

this action . Thi s motio n i s base do n th e fact th e partie s hav e settle dthi s matter , therefor e ahearin g i s no longer required . Respectfully submitted , NAOM I TSUD A Regiona l Counse l O^i'^ '

By :

Dated : Christopher/Merril l Attorne y FE B 2 8 201 2CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certil y tha

t o n thi s dat e I hav e sent

b y facsimil e where indicate dand place di n th e Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid , certifie dmai l - retur n receip t requeste d Complainant' s Motio n t o Withdra w Complaint , addresse da s follows : ORIGINA L AN D ONE COP Y

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 hidependenc e Avenue , S W " ' ^ WashingtonrDC-20591—• •

ON E COP Y Attn : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wright Building—Suit e 2WI00 0 Fax:(202)493-514 2

Hon . RichardC . Goodwi n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-23 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Facsimile : (202 ) 366-753 6 Balo g & Rasch , LLP Attn : Rober

t M . Rasch 160 1 Dov e Street , Suite 18 4 -Newport-BcachrCA-92660

- Fax:(949)851-252 0 Dated : FE B 2 8 201 2

Jef f Kamt^rg , Lega

l Technici ; Offic e o f th e Regional Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Western-Pacifi c Regio n Lawndale . Californi a
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.6
RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT
 APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 Agreement  Grant
Date Company  Participant
  Plan
  Grant of the Restricted Stock Award
 Vesting
 Service
 1




---



##### 



Disability
    Rights as a Shareholder
 No Employment Rights
 Transferability Transfer
 2




---



##### 



Repayment of Restricted Shares or Proceeds
 Withholding
 Notices
 Failure to Enforce Not a Waiver
 3




---



##### 



Authority of Committee
 Choice of Law
 Counterparts
 Complete Agreement; Inconsistencies
 Successors and Assigns
 Compliance with Code Section 409A.
 Section 83(b) Election
  4




---



##### 



APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.By:Name:Its: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerParticipant:
 5




---



##### 



SCHEDULE A
  6




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 
 Company Plan
   (a)
    
    o
    
    has consulted, and has been fully advised by, the
undersigneds own tax advisor, ____________, whose business address
is ____________, regarding the federal, state and local tax
consequences of receiving shares under the Plan, and particularly regarding the
advisability of making an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and pursuant to the
corresponding provisions, if any, of applicable state law, or(b)
    
    o
    
    has knowingly chosen not to consult such a tax advisor.
  (a)
    
    o
    
    to make an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the
Code, and is submitting to the Company, together with the undersigneds
executed Restricted Stock Award Agreement, an executed form entitled Election
Under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or(b)
    
    o
    
    not to make an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the
Code.
  Dated: _______________Participant:




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B
 
  1.
    
    The name, address, taxpayer identification number and taxable year of the undersigned are
as follows:
      2.
    
    The property with respect to which the election is made is described as
follows: _________ shares of Common Stock of APAC Customer Services, Inc., an
Illinois corporation (the Company).3.
    
    The date on which the property was transferred is _________.4.
    
    The property is subject to the following restrictions:
  5.
    
    The aggregate fair market value at the time of transfer, determined without
regard to any restriction other than a restriction which by its terms will never lapse,
of such property is $_________ (_________ dollars).6.
    
    The amount (if any) paid for such property is $0.00.




---



##### 



Dated: ____________Taxpayer
 2
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in 

the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the 

citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of 

Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-41438

ERIC JONES,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

BECKY JONES,

Respondent-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COLFAX COUNTY

Emilio Chavez, District Court Judge

Eric Jones

Raton, NM

Pro Se Appellant

Becky Jones

Albuquerque, NM

Pro Se Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BOGARDUS, Judge.

{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 

proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 

been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

KATHERINE A. WRAY, Judge
EXHIBIT 32

         Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned, Bernhard Steiner and Ann B. Ruple, in their capacities as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.
(the "Registrant") do each hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report"),
that, to the best of his or her knowledge:


               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this Report.


                  /S/  BERNHARD STEINER
                  ---------------------------------------------
                  BERNHARD STEINER
                  PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR
                  MAY 15, 2007

                  /S/  ANN B. RUPLE
                  ---------------------------------------------
                  ANN B. RUPLE
                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER
                  MAY 15, 2007

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act") this
certification accompanies the Report and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Act, be deemed filed by Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.
and will be retained by Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Special Projects 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Special 
Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, September 12, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 
or (510) 907-5274.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Special Projects 
Committee will be held Wednesday, September 12, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. 
Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Matthew O'Sullivan. For more information please contact Matthew 
O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 or (510) 907-5274, or write TAP Office, 
1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612-5217 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include various IRS issues.
    The agenda will include a discussion on various special topics with 
IRS processes.

    Dated: August 1, 2018.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-17016 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# C_2013164EN.01000101.xml

| 8.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/1

---

2013/C 164/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 156, 1.6.2013

OJ C 156, 1.6.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 147, 25.5.2013

OJ C 141, 18.5.2013

OJ C 129, 4.5.2013

OJ C 123, 27.4.2013

OJ C 114, 20.4.2013

OJ C 108, 13.4.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1360

ELSA TEKLE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-906-077)

Submitted: September 19, 2005 Decided: November 2, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for

Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M.

Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Michelle Gorden Latour,

Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Elsa Tekle, a native of Eritrea, petitions for review of

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as

untimely her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have

reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board

did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2005). Accordingly, we deny the

petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In

re: Tekle, No. A95-906-077 (B.I.A. Mar. 7, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases African American Business Ownership
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-R.22 **Contact:**  Briana Kaya Public Information Office
301-763-3030/3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, FEB. 8, 2011 Census Bureau Reports a 42 Percent Increase in the Number of Black-Owned Businesses in the Washington Metro Area The number of black-owned businesses in the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, D.C.-Va.-Md.-W.Va., metropolitan statistical area increased to 95,526 in 2007 from 67,213 in 2002, a 42.1 percent increase, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today. Over the same period, receipts generated by these businesses increased 44.2 percent to $9.3 billion. Nationally, the number of black-owned businesses rose to 1.9 million, a 60.5 percent increase, and sales by these businesses increased to $137.5 billion, a 55.1 percent increase. Industries in the metro area with the largest number of black-owned businesses included  health care and social assistance (14,996 businesses); and professional, scientific, and technical services (13,778 businesses). These new data come from the 2007 Survey of Business Owners, which is part of the 2007 Economic Census. This survey provides detailed information every five years for black-owned businesses, including the number of firms, sales and receipts, number of paid employees and annual payroll for states, counties, cities and metropolitan areas.  https://www.census.gov/econ/sbo/methodology.html
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Robert F. SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1181.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 25, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Neis R. Pearson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1






November 7, 2016


David C. Gray


Dear David:


This letter is intended to modify and amend the offer letter dated June 12, 2014 (the “Offer Letter”) between Brooks Automation, Inc. (“Brooks”) and you.  In light of your continued performance in the senior executive role as Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy and New Business Officer, Brooks has agreed to modify certain terms of offer letter relating to your eligibility for salary continuation in the event there is a termination of your employment as set forth below.
The following paragraphs are hereby added to the Offer Letter as new Sections 5 and 6:
		
	5.
	If Brooks terminates your employment without “cause” (as defined in Brooks’ equity grant documents), or you terminate your employment for “good reason” (as defined below), you will be eligible for salary continuation payments at your then current base salary for a period of six (6) months from your termination date.  If you have not secured employment following the initial six (6) months of salary continuation, Brooks will continue your salary on a bi-weekly basis for up to six (6) additional months while you are not employed.  In addition, you will continue to be covered under the Company’s medical, dental and vision plans at the same contribution level as current active employees.  In exchange, you agree to sign the Company’s customary Separation Agreement and Waiver of Claims.  For the sake of clarity, the salary continuation benefits described above shall not apply to any termination of employment that triggers a payment to you under the Change in Control Agreement dated as of November 7, 2016 between you and the Company.


		
	6.
	For purposes hereof, “good reason” shall mean, without your express written consent, the occurrence of any of the following:  (i) a material breach by the Company of any agreement that exists between you and the Company; (ii) a diminution of your responsibilities and authority resulting in responsibilities and authority in material respects inconsistent with the responsibilities and authority of the role of Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy and New Business Officer of the Company; (iii) a reduction of your base salary or of any material employee benefit enjoyed by you unless all senior executives of the Company suffer a substantially similar reduction; or (iv) a relocation of your office to a location more than 60 miles from the Company’s headquarters in Chelmsford, Massachusetts.”


Except as set forth above, all other terms and conditions contained in your Offer Letter remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms of this letter by signing and returning a copy hereof.
Sincerely yours,


/s/  William T. Montone


William T. Montone
Senior Vice President, Human Resources


ACKNOWLEDGED:


/s/ David C. Gray    


David C. Gray
Order entered August 18 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00335
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF N.N.O., A CHILD On Appeal from the 301st Ju dicial District Court

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 18
- 02229

O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated June 2 9 , 2020, we informed appellant the court reporter notified us tha t the r eporter’s record
ha d not been filed because appe llant had not (1) requested the re cord; or (2) paid
fo r o r m ade arrangements to pay for the record. We directed appellant to provide
the Court with written verifica tion showing the reporter’s re cord h ad be en requested and th at appellant had paid for or ma de arrangements to pay for the

rec ord or had been foun d e n ti tled to proceed without payment of costs. We
caution ed appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within ten days mi ght re su lt in the appeal being o r dered submitted without the reporter’srecord. To date, appel lant has not provid e d t h e required documentation nor

otherwise corresponded wit h the Court regarding the status of the reporter ’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER this a pp eal s ubmitted without a r eporter’s record. Appellan t ’ s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this or d e r
.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2966

To amend the National Trails Systems Act to designate the route from

Selma to Montgomery as a National Historic Trail.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. HILLIARD, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr.

CLYBURN, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. STOKES, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. MCCLOSKEY,

Mr. FOGLIETTA, Mr. FAZIO, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr.

CLAY, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. COYNE, Mr. JOHNSON of South

Dakota, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. RICHARDSON, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. KILDEE,

Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. MINK, Mr. REYNOLDS,

Mr. FROST, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. NEAL of North Carolina, Mr. HINCHEY,

Mr. EVANS, Mr. WHEAT, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Miss COLLINS of

Michigan, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. WATT, Mrs. MORELLA, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Trails Systems Act to designate

the route from Selma to Montgomery as a National

Historic Trail.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16

4 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end thereof

5 the following new paragraph:
2

•HR 2966 IH

1 ‘‘( ) The Selma to Montgomery National Historic

2 Trail, consisting of 54 miles of city streets and United

3 States Highway 80 from Brown Chapel to A.M.E. Church

4 in Selma to the State Capitol Building in Montgomery,

5 Alabama, traveled by voting rights advocates during

6 March 1965 to dramatize the need for voting rights legis7 lation, as generally described in the report of the Secretary

8 of the Interior prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this

9 section entitled ‘Selma to Montgomery’ and dated April

10 1993. Maps depicting the route shall be on file and avail11 able for public inspection in the Office of the National

12 Park Service, Department of the Interior. The trail shall

13 be administered by the Secretary of the Interior. In the

14 administration of the trail, the Secretary shall cooperate

15 with State and local authorities to preserve historic sites,

16 including (but not limited to) the Edmund Pettus Bridge

17 and the Brown Chapel AME Church.’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 11, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30470

 

G F THOMAS INVESTMENTS L P, on behalf of itself and all others

similarly situated

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

CLECO CORP

Defendant - Appellee

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:03-CV-2227

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, BENAVIDES and STEWART Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,417
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,523
<PP&E>                                         110,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 169,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,897
<BONDS>                                        106,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       145,512
<OTHER-SE>                                   (102,530)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,024
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,893
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,894)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,988)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,613
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,625
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>