alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-10849

Conference Calendar

 

ROQUE T. ARANDA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JON KEY, Gaines County Sheriff; RICKY B. SMITH, District

Attorney; GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; BOARD OF PARDONS

AND PAROLES,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:00-CV-198-C

--------------------

February 14, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roque T. Aranda, Texas prisoner # 805045, appeals the

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in which he alleged

that his sentence had been improperly enhanced by the use of

unauthenticated prior conviction records and that the Texas Board

of Pardons and Paroles was improperly using those prior

conviction records against him. 
No. 00-10849

-2-

Aranda’s claim that his sentence was improperly enhanced is

not cognizable because neither his conviction nor his sentence

has been invalidated. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487

(1994). 

Aranda’s claim against the Texas Board of Pardons and

Paroles is also without merit. Since, in Texas, it is entirely

speculative whether an inmate will actually obtain parole, there

is no constitutional expectancy of parole. Madison v. Parker,

104 F.3d 765, 768 (5th Cir. 1997). Because Aranda cannot show

the violation of a clearly established constitutional right to

parole, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim must fail. See West v.

Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (U.S. 1988).

Aranda’s appeal is without arguable merit. See Howard v.

King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). It is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

The three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

“prohibits a prisoner from proceeding IFP if he has had three

actions or appeals dismissed for frivolousness, maliciousness, or

failure to state a claim.” Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 819

(5th Cir. 1997) (citing Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385

(5th Cir. 1996)). Aranda has previously had at least one strike

against him. Aranda v. Millsaps, No. 99-11394 (5th Cir. Aug. 29,

2000). Aranda has acquired another two strikes as a result of

this frivolous complaint and appeal. See Adepegba, 103 F. 3d at

386-88. Additionally, Aranda today accumulates two more strikes

in another appeal before this court. Aranda v. Shaw, No. 00-

10844. He now has at least five strikes. Accordingly, Aranda
No. 00-10849

-3-

may no longer proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed

while he is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED; 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11415

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAFAEL REYES-MORALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:05-CR-31-1

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rafael Reyes-Morales appeals from his guilty-plea conviction

and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation. For the

first time on appeal, he argues that the district court erred by

assessing separate criminal history points for his prior

sentences for sexual assault of a child and possession of a

controlled substance. As the Government concedes, those two

sentences are related for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2)

because they occurred on the same occasion. See United States v.

Moreno-Arredondo, 255 F.3d 198, 205 (5th Cir. 2001); United
No. 05-11415

-2-

States v. Johnson, 961 F.2d 1188, 1189 (5th Cir. 1992). Because

the correct advisory guideline range is less than the sentence

imposed, we vacate Reyes-Morales’s sentence and remand for

resentencing consistent with this opinion. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 275 (5th Cir. 2005).

Reyes-Morales’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Reyes-Morales contends that Almendarez-Torres was

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such

arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. 

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Reyes-Morales properly

concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of AlmendarezTorres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve

it for further review.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM Reyes-Morales’s conviction, but we

VACATE his sentence and REMAND for resentencing.
No. 11057.

#### Schoenberg *v.*Schoenberg.

Decided October 5, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Spangenberg & Spangenberg,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Horstman & Horstman,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Spear and Shaucic, JJ., concur.
LG Electronics 

LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc . 

1000 Sylvan Avenue 

Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 

Certification 

This is to certify that LG Electronics, Inc. has sent by next day delivery a notice 

of its petition for waiver for LG Multi V III YRF multi-split air-source heat recovery and 

heat pump systems to manufacturers, known to LG, of domestically marketed units of the 

same product type (as listed the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 

U.S.c. § 6311). 

Attached arc the names and addresses of each person to whom a notice of the 

petition was sent by next day delivery. 

Date: September 6, 20 II 

Certified by: 

John l. Taylor 

Vice President 

Government Relations and Communications 

LG Electronics USA, Inc. 

1750 K Street NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Phone: 202-719-3490 

Fax: 847-941 -8177 

Email: john.tayior@lge.com 
G Electronics 

September 6, 20 II 

To Whom It May Concern : 

Re: LG Electronics. Inc. Petition for Waiver 

LO Electronics U.S.A., Inc . 

1000 Sylvan Avenue 

Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 

This is to nmify you by next day delivery that the Department of Energy (DOE) 

has published in the Federal Register on August 30, 2011,76 Fed. Reg. 53889 (enclosed 

herewith), LG Electronics Inc.'s Petition for Waiver of the DOE regulations on energy 

conservation tcst procedures, and supporting documents from which confidential 

information, if any, as determined by DOE, has been deleted in accordance with 10 CFR 

1004.11. We are also advising you of your opportunity to comnlcnl 10 DOE on the 

petition for waiver as provided in the Federal Register. 

Pursuant 10 DOE's rules, please provide us with a copy of any comments. Please 

send comments to me at the address set forth below. 

Sincerely, 

John I. Taylor 

Vice President 

Government Rel ations and 

Communications 

LG Electronics USA, Inc. 

1750 K Street NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Phone : 202-719-3490 

Fax: 847-941-8177 

jtaylor@lge.com 
Carrier Corporation 

7310 West Morris Street 

Indianapolis, IN 46231 

Attn: Dr. John Galbraith, VP for RCS Engineering 

Daikin AC (Americas), Inc. 

1645 Wallace Drive 

Suite 110 

Carrnllton, TX 75006 

Attn: Akinori Atarashi, President 

Fujitsu General America, Inc. 

353 Route 46 West 

Fairfield, NJ 07004 

Attn: Roy Kuczera, Senior Vice President of HV AC Sales, and Arturo Thur De Koos, 

Engineering & Technical Support 

Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. 

3400 Lawrenceville-Suwanee Road 

IIV AC Advanced Products Division 

Suwanee, GA 30024-2403 

Attn: Paul Doppel 

Sarnsung Electronics America, Inc. 

18600 Broadwick Street 

Rancho Dominguez, CA 90220 

Attn: Michael Moss 

SANYO North America Corp. 

1690 Roberts Blvd., NW 

Suite 110 

Kennesaw, GA 30144 

Attn: Gary Nettinger, Vice President, Applied Products Group 

Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute 

2111 Wilson Blvd. 

Suite 500 

Arlington, V A 22201 

Attn: Stephen R. Yurek, Esq., President
October 22, 2015

Robert Todd Dean

1001 Northway Dr ive , Suite 202

Anchorage, AK 99508

Dear Mr. Dean :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your June 22 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of Denali Media Holdings filed

in D ocket No. FAA

- 20 15

- 33 7 0 , but we are unable to pro cess your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you s eek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely af fect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request

.

For more detailed informati on relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html

. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed eff ective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

November 23, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with PACCAR

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a teleconference held on Wednesday, November 17, 2010 

between Margaret Sullivan of PACCAR and Angela Cullen of the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). The discussion focused primarily on clarifications of the proposed definitions of 

averaging sets, warranty periods, and vehicle families.
P. 1



# OAR Box 1865 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 53 ) IV-E-4 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:29AM

Sheet 53 of 105R2

_ r~•- "-•• - 

## ^ e 

## °> * UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N 

# A-83-2 7 | ^W 7 S 0ff| c e o f Ai rQualityPlannin g an d Standard s IV-E-4 1 \mm+*

Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 ! +> . -r<T

I ^m*? 

## 2 0 NO V 198 7

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Meetin g Wit hOMB o n Industria l Boile r NSP S (SO2 ) FROM : Walte r H . Stevenso n

Standard s Developmen t Branch , ESE D (MD-13 ) TO : Docke t No . A-83-2 7 O n Novembe r18 , 1987 , an EPA/OM B teleconferenc e wa

s initiate d a t 10:0 0 a.m . The followin g individual s participate d i n th e teleconference :

EP AOM B Wal t Stevenso nNicola s Garci a Fre dPorte r A l McGartlan d Chri s Herma nSteve nAkin f Nanc y Ket e E d Watt s Joh nPfieffe r Th e meetin g had bee nrequeste db y OMB t o allow

EP A t o respondt o thre e questions : (1 ) th e reasonablenes s o f a n FG D exemptio nfo r boiler s wit hles s tha n3 0 percen t coa l o r oi l capacit y facto r versu s exemptio n fo r coa l an

d oi l boiler s wit hles s tha na 4 5 percen t capacit y factor ; (2 ) th e cos t effectivenes s o f a 7 0 percen t SO 2 reductio nrequiremen t versu s a 9 0 percen t reductio nrequirement ; an d (3 ) th e cost-effectivenes s o f th e us e o f desulfurize dfue l oils . Th e thre e subjects wer e discussed , an dth e meetin g conclude da t 11:0 0 a.m . cc : Bruc e Armstron g (ANR-443 ) Jac k Farme r (MD-13 ) Chri s Herma n(LE-132A ) Fre dPorte r (MD-13 ) Mik e Shelb

y (PM-221 )
No. 10998.

#### Hutton et al., Partners as W. E. Hutton & Co., *v.*Curry.

Decided November 30, 1909.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Ernst &*Cassatt, for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Thomas L. Michie,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur. Crew, C. J., Spear and Sitauck, JJ., dissent.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:42 AM To: Wayland, Robertj Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Chappell, Linda; Elman, Barry Subject: Let's do 11:30 for the RIA call

Shall we use the same call-in number we’ve been using?
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Gregory K. Roeper, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vodavi Technology, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information ;and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 13, 2006                                                       /s/ Gregory K. Roeper   Gregory K. Roeper   Chief Executive Officer  
17
# C_2011271EN.01000801.xml

| 14.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 September 2011

2011/C 271/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3645 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 105,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4476 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86315 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1260 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2037 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,551 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3339 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2803 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4280 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3214 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3545 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6476 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6557 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6973 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 506,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0141 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7316 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4963 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 881,56 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1842 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,687 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,2463 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,222 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3370 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5168 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,9430 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3645

JPY

Japanese yen

105,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4476

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86315

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1260

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2037

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,551

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3339

RON

Romanian leu

4,2803

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4280

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3214

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3545

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6476

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6557

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6973

KRW

South Korean won

1 506,35

ZAR

South African rand

10,0141

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7316

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4963

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 881,56

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1842

PHP

Philippine peso

58,687

RUB

Russian rouble

41,2463

THB

Thai baht

41,222

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3370

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5168

INR

Indian rupee

64,9430

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>   1

                           DATUM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-96564, 33-10035, 33-41709, 33-79772 and
333-46365) of Datum Inc. of our report dated February 17, 2000 relating to the
financial statements and financial statement scheduled, appearing on page F-1 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/   PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
----------------------------------------
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS  LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 27, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                        68
<INVENTORY>                                     20,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,525
<PP&E>                                          22,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,532
<BONDS>                                          8,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1005
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,137
<SALES>                                         67,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,257
<CGS>                                           40,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    214
<INCOME-TAX>                                       154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 60
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        60
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
05/27/201 1 10';5 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + QM S @l001/00 2

& U.S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATION. , FEDERA L AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFIC E OF HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . n "ARTMENTO F •••oPORWiO M : B OPERATION S :=!A i ? 1 A li : 5 5

I n th e Matte

r o f Empir e Fligh t Academ y FDM S No . FAA-2 e 11-029 0 

### AGENCY' S PROPOSE D PROCEDURA L SCHEDUL E The Federa

l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) , b y counsel , hereb y files it s propose d procedura l schedul e a s follows : Fil e discover

y requests : B y July 1 , 201 1 Fil e stipulations , witnes s list s (includin g summar y o f propose dtestimony) , andcopie s o f exhibit s to b e offereda

t hearing : B y Septembe

r 1 , 2011 . Propose dhearin g location : Ne w York, NY The partie s hav e been unabl e to reach asetdemen t t o date , bu

t th e Agenc y i s ope

n t o haying fiuthe

r discussions . Respectfull

y submitted , AlfredR . Johnson , Jr . Regiona l Counse l ry*M . Germa

n Date : Ma y 4 , 201 1 i jrT A r%i».- ^ 

## BEARIN G DOCKE T05/27/201 1 10:5 8 FAX 202493514 2 FA A + QM S 0002/00 2

CERTinCAT E O F SERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoing Agency' s Propose dProcedura l Schedul e ha s bee

n sen t thi s dat e b y first clas s mai l andfacsimile t o the following : Gregor y S . Winton , Esq . Aviatio n La w Expert s , LLC On e Researc h Court , Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 Telefax : (301)294-252 5 The Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yode r Chief Administrativ e La

w Judg e U.S . Departmen

t o f Hearings , M-20 , RoomE12-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jersey Avenue , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Telefax : (202)366-753 6 I hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoing Agency' s Propose dProcedura l Schedul e ha s bee

n sen t thi s dat e b y firs t clas s mai l t o th e following: : Federa l Aviatio n Admirastratio n (Origina l andon e copy ) 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docket

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbur Wrigh t Buildin g ^ Suit

e

Date : MA

Y - 4 201 1 ^ ^ ^ is aHooks Paralega l Specialis t Federa l Aviation Administratio n Ofific e of Regiona l Counsel 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4