alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Countrywide Financial Corporation (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Angelo R. Mozilo,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Angelo R. Mozilo    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Angelo R. Mozilo        |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| February 21, 2006       |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Countrywide Financial Corporation and willbe retained by Countrywide Financial Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Charles SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-715.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2879 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2879

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require a three-fifths 
vote in the House of Representatives to waive the applicability of any 
 provision of that Act to the House of Representatives, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5 1993

  Mr. Buyer (for himself, Mr. Fawell, Mr. Livingston, Mr. Quinn, Mr. 
  Istook, Mr. Huffington, Mr. Horn, Mr. Everett, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. 
   Greenwood, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Portman, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
  Calvert, Mr. Grams, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. McInnis, Mr. 
Miller of Florida, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. 
 McKeon, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
Boehlert, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Doolittle, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. Goss, 
Mr. Zimmer, Mrs. Fowler, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Linder, Mr. Petri, Mr. McHugh, 
  Mr. Herger, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Ravenel, Mr. 
 Ramstad, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Quillen, Mr. Bachus of Alabama, Mr. Canady, 
 Mr. Ballenger, Mr. McCollum, Mr. Hoke, and Mr. Talent) introduced the 
      following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require a three-fifths 
vote in the House of Representatives to waive the applicability of any 
 provision of that Act to the House of Representatives, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 904(c) of 
the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by inserting ``or the 
House of Representatives'' after ``Senate'' both places it appears.

                                 <all>
```
#### Faye Hancock BYRD, Appellant, v. BUD’S WRECKER SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation and Auto-Owners Insurance Company, a Michigan corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-587.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 7, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB00-CN.19**
**Contact:**  Decennial Media Relations								301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)	(301) 457-1037 (TDD)e-mail: 2000usa@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2000

## Census Bureau Postpones Operational Press Conference

### **CENSUS BUREAU MEDIA ADVISORY - REVISED**

	The Census Bureau has canceled the operational news briefing previously scheduled on Friday, Feb. 25, at 12:30 p.m. EST, on the status of Census 2000 operations.  We hope to hold the press conference early next week.

 The Census Bureau will send a new advisory with up-to-date information on the press conference.

 We apologize for any inconvenience this cancellation may have caused.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
# C_2011365EN.01000102.xml

| 15.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6328 — Socimac/Bollore/Société d'Exploitation du Terminal de Vridi)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 365/02

On 9 December 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6328. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6328. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
No. 11223.

#### The Village of Toronto *v.*Stevens.

Decided February 1, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Jefferson county.

*Mr. P. A.. Gavin*and *Mr. J. Oscar Naylor,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John IV. Porter*and *Mr. P. P. Lewis,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, Spear and Si-iauck, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2968 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2968

   To prohibit retroactive increases in individual income tax rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 1993

 Mrs. Maloney (for herself, Mr. Penny, and Mr. McHale) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit retroactive increases in individual income tax rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Retroactive Income Tax Increase 
Prohibition Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF RETROACTIVE INCOME TAX INCREASES.

    No provision of law increasing income tax rates applicable to 
individuals may apply to taxable years beginning before the date of the 
enactment of such law.

                                 <all>
```
200 La. 140

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Warren J. MOITY.

No. 51995.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 21, 1971.

In re: Warren J. Moity applying for writ of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ denied. There is no error of law under the only errors assigned by relator.
#### Birdie R. LOWENTHAL, Appellant, v. John D. LOVELLETTE, Appellee.

No. 72-433.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 27, 1973.

Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Nie-moeller & Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellant.

Fuller, Brumer, Moss & Cohen, Pod-hurst, Orseck & Parks, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, awarding the appellee $30,000.00 in damages for personal injuries as a result of a collision of appellee’s motorcycle and appellant’s automobile.

The complaint against appellant charged her with negligently operating her automobile so that it was caused to collide with a motorcycle being operated by the appellee at the intersection of S.W. 92nd Avenue and Sunset Drive, Miami, Florida, while appellee was traveling east on Sunset Drive and appellant was traveling north on 92nd Avenue which was controlled by a stop sign.

Appellant urges reversal on the grounds (1) that the trial court erred in striking her defense of contributory negligence at the close of all of the evidence, for failure of proof; (2) that it was error to refuse to grant a mistrial where plaintiff’s witness testified that she gave a statement to an insurance agent; (3) that the verdict and judgment were excessive.

In our review of the issues presented, we have given full consideration to the record on appeal, briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
I, E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ending March28, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C.§§78m or 78o(d); and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
Dated: June 16, 2004    /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 21.1


                       Subsidiaries of the Registrant

     SB Operating Co.
#### Laverne LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-326.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 4, 1972.

Charles W. Musgrove, Public Defender, and Carl V. M. Coffin, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

*388Robert L. Shevm, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The sole point on this appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support appellant’s conviction of assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree. From our review of the record, there appears to be ample evidence to support the conviction. The judgment and sentence from which this appeal was taken are affirmed.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
#### Duncan E. BRITT, Maurice P. Beeman, Charles S. Houha and James P. Thayer; D. E. Britt Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation; and Citizens Casualty Company of New York, a corporation, Petitioners, v. Joseph HENRY, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Gary L. Henry, Deceased, a minor, Respondents.

No. 70-597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.
# C_2013238EN.01000101.xml

| 17.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6948 — Telenor/Globul/Germanos)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 238/01

On 3 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6948. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6948. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>




                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                                   CONSENT OF

                           STONEFIELD, JOSEPHSON, INC.



<PAGE>



                                   CONSENT OF
                           STONEFIELD, JOSEPHSON, INC.
                    INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


thehealthchannel.com, Inc.
Newport Beach, California

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Registration Statement on Form S-8 and in the related Prospectus, of our report
dated February 21, 2000, relating to the financial statements of
thehealthchannel.com, Inc. as of December 31, 1999.

         We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the caption
"Experts" in such Prospectus.


 /s/  Stonefield, Josephson, Inc.
---------------------------------
STONEFIELD, JOSEPHSON, INC.

Santa Monica, California
Dated: August 15, 2000
EXHIBIT
      23.0













CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






The
      Board
      of Directors and Stockholders






CPI
      Corp.:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements No.
      333-08634, No. 333-08636, No. 333-64296, No. 33-19981, No. 33-41405, No.
      33-50082 and 002-86403 on Forms S-8 and No. 33-17582 on Form S-3 of CPI Corp.
      of
      our reports dated April 18, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
      of
      CPI Corp. and subsidiaries as of February 4, 2006 and February 5, 2005 and
      the
      related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity,
      and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February
      4,
      2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
      financial reporting as of February 4, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting as of February 4, 2006, which reports appear
      in
      the February 4, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of CPI Corp.





/s/
                KPMG LLPKPMG
                LLP

















St.
      Louis, Missouri


April
      18,
      2006
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133681 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133681 

 COA: 265197 
 Wayne CC: 04-011031-01

VERNICE RAY ROBINSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNION
PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION AT MARCH 31, 1999, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      322
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                         53
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   633
<PP&E>                                          10,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,253
<BONDS>                                          2,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,685
<SALES>                                            351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   415
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  64
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (36)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 42
<DISCONTINUED>                                     133
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2924

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to eliminate soft

money from Federal election campaigns.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. COX introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

eliminate soft money from Federal election campaigns.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds as follows:

5 (1) Special interest money has become largely a

6 source of guaranteed support for political incum7 bents and is subverting the democratic principles at

8 the heart of the electoral process in the United

9 States.
2

•HR 2924 IH

1 (2) In particular, so-called ‘‘soft money’’ is

2 making the current system of Federal election cam3 paign contribution limits untenable.

4 (3) Soft money enables political parties, labor

5 unions, and other organizations to spend unlimited

6 funds to influence Federal election campaigns and is

7 subject to no public reporting requirements.

8 (4) During the 1992 election cycle, labor unions

9 alone poured more than $400,000,000 of soft money

10 into political campaigns.

11 (5) The total amount of soft money expended in

12 the 1992 election cycle exceeded $750,000,000.

13 (6) Banning all soft money contributions will

14 decrease spending on Federal election campaigns

15 and will make individual contributions from small

16 donors the key to a successful Federal election cam17 paign.

18 (7) Eliminating soft money contributions will

19 mean that all contributions to Federal election cam20 paigns will be subject to Federal disclosure require21 ments.

22 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF POLITICAL PARTY SOFT MONEY.

23 (a) CONTRIBUTION DEFINITION AMENDMENT.—Sec24 tion 301(8)(B) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of

25 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(8)(B)) is amended—
3

•HR 2924 IH

1 (1) by striking out clauses (viii) through (xii);

2 and

3 (2) by redesignating clauses (xiii) and (xiv) as

4 clauses (viii) and (ix), respectively.

5 (b) EXPENDITURE DEFINITION AMENDMENT.—Sec6 tion 301(9)(B) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of

7 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(9)(B)) is amended—

8 (1) by striking out clauses (viii) and (ix);

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at

10 the end of clause (vii); and

11 (3) by redesignating clause (x) as clause (viii).

12 SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF CORPORATE AND LABOR UNION

13 SOFT MONEY.

14 Section 316(b)(2) of the Federal Election Campaign

15 Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441b(b)(2)) is amended by striking

16 out ‘‘(A) communications’’ and all that follows through

17 ‘‘and (C)’’.

Æ
#### The FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. SERVAN LAND CO., Inc., d/b/a Rolling Hills Golf & Country Club, Appellee.

No. 636.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Aug. 4, 1967.

Rex Conrad, of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Joseph A. Varón, Hollywood, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal filed by the plaintiff, The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, from a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Servan Land Company, Inc., d/b/a Rolling Hills Golf & *Country*Club. Plaintiff sought restitution of monies from the defendant because of unjust enrichment of the latter resulting from an overpayment made under a policy of theft insurance.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties. From such consideration we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS and CROSS, JJ., and LEA-VENGOOD, C. R., Associate Judge, concur.