39688 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 

4For a full discussion of this clarification, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 

5See PET Film from Taiwan Amended Final 

Determination. 

1See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case briefs. Commerce 

intends to issue the final results of this 

administrative review, including the 

results of its analysis of the issues raised 

in any written briefs, not later than 120 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice, unless extended, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of this 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine and U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) shall assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) 

in the final results of this review, we 

will calculate importer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rates on the basis of 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for an importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of such 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an 

importer-specific rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Commerce clarified its ‘‘automatic 

assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003.4

This clarification applies to entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by a respondent for which it 

did not know its merchandise was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 15 days after publication of the 

final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of 

PET Film from Taiwan entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the company 

under review will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is zero or de 

minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required); (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters is 2.40 percent.5 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Dated: August 3, 2018. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Finding of No Shipments for 

SMTC 

V. Product Comparisons 

VI. Comparison to Normal Value 

A. Determination of Comparison Method 

B. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

C. Date of Sale 

D. Export Price 

E. Normal Value 

F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Comparison Market Prices 

G. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparisons 

H. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–17179 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) has received requests to 

conduct administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with June 

anniversary dates. In accordance with 

Commerce’s regulations, we are 

initiating those administrative reviews. 

DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with June 

anniversary dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

Commerce discussed below refer to the 

number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting time. 

Notice of No Sales 

If a producer or exporter named in 

this notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the period of 

review (POR), it must notify Commerce 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. All 

submissions must be filed electronically 

at http://access.trade.gov in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.303.1 Such 

submissions are subject to verification 

in accordance with section 782(i) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served 

on every party on Commerce’s service 

list. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event Commerce limits the 

number of respondents for individual 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39689 

2Such entities include entities that have not 

participated in the proceeding, entities that were 

preliminarily granted a separate rate in any 

currently incomplete segment of the proceeding 

(e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new 

shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their 

separate rate in the most recently completed 

segment of the proceeding in which they 

participated. 

3Only changes to the official company name, 

rather than trade names, need to be addressed via 

a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding 

new trade names may be submitted via a Separate 

Rate Certification. 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, Commerce 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the 

period of review. We intend to place the 

CBP data on the record within five days 

of publication of the initiation notice 

and to make our decision regarding 

respondent selection within 30 days of 

publication of the initiation Federal 

Register notice. Comments regarding the 

CBP data and respondent selection 

should be submitted seven days after 

the placement of the CBP data on the 

record of this review. Parties wishing to 

submit rebuttal comments should 

submit those comments five days after 

the deadline for the initial comments. 

In the event Commerce decides it is 

necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, Commerce has found that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (e.g., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will 

not conduct collapsing analyses at the 

respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this antidumping 

proceeding (e.g., investigation, 

administrative review, new shipper 

review or changed circumstances 

review). For any company subject to this 

review, if Commerce determined, or 

continued to treat, that company as 

collapsed with others, Commerce will 

assume that such companies continue to 

operate in the same manner and will 

collapse them for respondent selection 

purposes. Otherwise, Commerce will 

not collapse companies for purposes of 

respondent selection. Parties are 

requested to (a) identify which 

companies subject to review previously 

were collapsed, and (b) provide a 

citation to the proceeding in which they 

were collapsed. Further, if companies 

are requested to complete the Quantity 

and Value (Q&V) Questionnaire for 

purposes of respondent selection, in 

general each company must report 

volume and value data separately for 

itself. Parties should not include data 

for any other party, even if they believe 

they should be treated as a single entity 

with that other party. If a company was 

collapsed with another company or 

companies in the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

where Commerce considered collapsing 

that entity, complete Q&V data for that 

collapsed entity must be submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that has requested a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that Commerce may 

extend this time if it is reasonable to do 

so. Determinations by Commerce to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (NME) countries, Commerce 

begins with a rebuttable presumption 

that all companies within the country 

are subject to government control and, 

thus, should be assigned a single 

antidumping duty deposit rate. It is 

Commerce’s policy to assign all 

exporters of merchandise subject to an 

administrative review in an NME 

country this single rate unless an 

exporter can demonstrate that it is 

sufficiently independent so as to be 

entitled to a separate rate. 

To establish whether a firm is 

sufficiently independent from 

government control of its export 

activities to be entitled to a separate 

rate, Commerce analyzes each entity 

exporting the subject merchandise. In 

accordance with the separate rates 

criteria, Commerce assigns separate 

rates to companies in NME cases only 

if respondents can demonstrate the 

absence of both de jure and de facto 

government control over export 

activities. 

All firms listed below that wish to 

qualify for separate rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as 

appropriate, either a separate rate 

application or certification, as described 

below. For these administrative reviews, 

in order to demonstrate separate rate 

eligibility, Commerce requires entities 

for whom a review was requested, that 

were assigned a separate rate in the 

most recent segment of this proceeding 

in which they participated, to certify 

that they continue to meet the criteria 

for obtaining a separate rate. The 

Separate Rate Certification form will be 

available on Commerce’s website at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nmesep-rate.html on the date of publication 

of this Federal Register notice. In 

responding to the certification, please 

follow the ‘‘Instructions for Filing the 

Certification’’ in the Separate Rate 

Certification. Separate Rate 

Certifications are due to Commerce no 

later than 30 calendar days after 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. The deadline and requirement 

for submitting a Certification applies 

equally to NME-owned firms, wholly 

foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers 

who purchase and export subject 

merchandise to the United States. 

Entities that currently do not have a 

separate rate from a completed segment 

of the proceeding 2 should timely file a 

Separate Rate Application to 

demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. In addition, 

companies that received a separate rate 

in a completed segment of the 

proceeding that have subsequently 

made changes, including, but not 

limited to, changes to corporate 

structure, acquisitions of new 

companies or facilities, or changes to 

their official company name,3 should 

timely file a Separate Rate Application 

to demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. The Separate 

Rate Status Application will be 

available on Commerce’s website at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nmesep-rate.html on the date of publication 

of this Federal Register notice. In 

responding to the Separate Rate Status 

Application, refer to the instructions 

contained in the application. Separate 

Rate Status Applications are due to 

Commerce no later than 30 calendar 

days of publication of this Federal 

Register notice. The deadline and 

requirement for submitting a Separate 

Rate Status Application applies equally 

to NME-owned firms, wholly foreignowned firms, and foreign sellers that 

purchase and export subject 

merchandise to the United States. 

For exporters and producers who 

submit a separate-rate status application 

or certification and subsequently are 

selected as mandatory respondents, 

these exporters and producers will no 

longer be eligible for separate rate status 

unless they respond to all parts of the 

questionnaire as mandatory 

respondents. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
39690 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 

4The name of the company listed above was 

misspelled in the initiation notice that published on 

July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). The correct spelling 

of the company name is listed in this notice. 5The companies listed above were misspelled in 

the initiation notice that published on July 12, 2018 

(83 FR 32270). The correct spelling of these 

companies names are listed in this notice. 6The company listed above was inadvertently 

omitted from the initiation notice that published on 

July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). 

7The company listed above was inadvertently 

omitted from the initiation notice that published on 

July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). 8The name of the company listed above was 

misspelled in the initiation notice that published on 

July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). The correct spelling 

of the company name is listed in this notice. 9Commerce inadvertently listed two companies 

as one in the initiation notice that published on July 

12, 2018 (83 FR 32270). The companies listed above 

are individual companies. 10 In the initiation notice that published on July 

12, 2018 (83 FR 32270), the period of review for the 

referenced case was incorrect. The period listed 

above is the correct period of review for this case. 

Initiation of Reviews 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating 

administrative reviews of the following 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders and findings. We intend to issue 

the final results of these reviews not 

later than June 30, 2019. 

Period to be 

reviewed 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

BELGIUM: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length Plate,4 A–423–812 ............................................................................. 11/14/16–4/30/18 

Hengelhoef Concrete Joints NV 

GERMANY: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length Plate,5 A–428–844 ........................................................................... 11/14/16–4/30/18 

Ilsenburger Grobblech GmbH 

Rudolf Rafflenbeul Stahlwarenfabrik GmbH & Co. 

Salzgitter Flachstahl GmbH 

VDM Metals GmbH 6

VDM Metals International GmbH 7

REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length Plate,8 A–580–887 ....................................................... 11/14/16–4/30/18 

Hyundai Steel Company 

SPAIN: Finished Carbon Steel Flanges, A–469–815 ......................................................................................................... 2/8/17–5/31/18 

Ateaciones De Metales Sinterizados S.A. 

Central Y Almacenes 

Grupo Cunado 

Transglory S.A. 

Tubacero, S.L. 

ULMA Forja, S.Coop 

SPAIN: Chlorinated Isocyanurates, A–469–814 ................................................................................................................. 6/1/17–5/31/18 

Ercros, S.A. of Spain 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Aluminum Extrusions,9 A–570–967 ................................................................... 5/1/17–4/30/18 

Asia Alum Group 

Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd. 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Chlorinated Isocyanurates, A–570–898 ............................................................ 6/1/17–5/31/18 

Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. 

Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co. Ltd. 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Polyester Staple Fiber, A–570–905 ................................................................... 6/1/17–5/31/18 

Yangzhou Tinfulong New Technology Fiber Co., Ltd. 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Silicon Metal, A–570–806 .................................................................................. 6/1/17–5/31/18 

Yunnan Fu yang Trade Co., Ltd. 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Tapered Roller Bearings, A–570–601 ............................................................... 6/1/17–5/31/18 

Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd. 

CNH Industrial Italia SpA 

GGB Bearing Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 

GSP Automotive Group Wenzhou Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou Hanji Auto Parts Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou Radical Energy-Saving Technology Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou Xiaoshan Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. 

Ningbo Xinglun Bearings Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Aokai Bearing Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai General Bearing Co., Ltd. 

Taizhou Zson Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Jingle Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Machinery Import & Export Corp. 

Zhejiang Zhaofeng Mechanical and Electronic Co., Ltd. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length Plate,10 C–580–888 ...................................................... 4/4/17–12/31/17 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: High Pressure Steel Cylinders, C–570–978 ...................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

Beijing Tianhai Industry Co., Ltd. 

Langfang Tianhai High Pressure Container Co., Ltd. 

Tianjin Tianhai High Pressure Container Co., Ltd. 

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

Duty Absorption Reviews 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39691 

11See section 782(b) of the Act. 

12See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also the frequently asked 

questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_

info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 

1See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty 

Order, 83 FR 37465 (August 1, 2018) (Antidumping 

Duty Order). 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine whether antidumping duties 

have been absorbed by an exporter or 

producer subject to the review if the 

subject merchandise is sold in the 

United States through an importer that 

is affiliated with such exporter or 

producer. The request must include the 

name(s) of the exporter or producer for 

which the inquiry is requested. 

Gap Period Liquidation 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the POR. 

Administrative Protective Orders and 

Letters of Appearance 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with the procedures 

outlined in Commerce’s regulations at 

19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures 

apply to administrative reviews 

included in this notice of initiation. 

Parties wishing to participate in any of 

these administrative reviews should 

ensure that they meet the requirements 

of these procedures (e.g., the filing of 

separate letters of appearance as 

discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). 

Factual Information Requirements 

Commerce’s regulations identify five 

categories of factual information in 19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are 

summarized as follows: (i) Evidence 

submitted in response to questionnaires; 

(ii) evidence submitted in support of 

allegations; (iii) publicly available 

information to value factors under 19 

CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the 

adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 

351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on 

the record by Commerce; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)–(iv). These regulations 

require any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also 

provide specific time limits for such 

factual submissions based on the type of 

factual information being submitted. 

Please review the final rule, available at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 

1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to 

submitting factual information in this 

segment. 

Any party submitting factual 

information in an antidumping duty or 

countervailing duty proceeding must 

certify to the accuracy and completeness 

of that information.11 Parties are hereby 

reminded that revised certification 

requirements are in effect for company/ 

government officials as well as their 

representatives. All segments of any 

antidumping duty or countervailing 

duty proceedings initiated on or after 

August 16, 2013, should use the formats 

for the revised certifications provided at 

the end of the Final Rule.12 Commerce 

intends to reject factual submissions in 

any proceeding segments if the 

submitting party does not comply with 

applicable revised certification 

requirements. 

Extension of Time Limits Regulation 

Parties may request an extension of 

time limits before a time limit 

established under Part 351 expires, or as 

otherwise specified by the Secretary. 

See 19 CFR 351.302. In general, an 

extension request will be considered 

untimely if it is filed after the time limit 

established under Part 351 expires. For 

submissions which are due from 

multiple parties simultaneously, an 

extension request will be considered 

untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on 

the due date. Examples include, but are 

not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal 

briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; 

(2) factual information to value factors 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, 

clarification and correction filed 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) 

comments concerning the selection of a 

surrogate country and surrogate values 

and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

data; and (5) quantity and value 

questionnaires. Under certain 

circumstances, Commerce may elect to 

specify a different time limit by which 

extension requests will be considered 

untimely for submissions which are due 

from multiple parties simultaneously. In 

such a case, Commerce will inform 

parties in the letter or memorandum 

setting forth the deadline (including a 

specified time) by which extension 

requests must be filed to be considered 

timely. This modification also requires 

that an extension request must be made 

in a separate, stand-alone submission, 

and clarifies the circumstances under 

which Commerce will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time 

limits. These modifications are effective 

for all segments initiated on or after 

October 21, 2013. Please review the 

final rule, available at http://

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ 

html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 

submitting factual information in these 

segments. 

These initiations and this notice are, 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: August 6, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17162 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–469–817] 

Ripe Olives From Spain: Notice of 

Correction to Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable August 1, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bryan Hansen or Peter Zukowski, AD/ 

CVD Operations Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–0189, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 1, 2018, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) published the 

Antidumping Duty Order on ripe olives 

from Spain.1 In the Antidumping Duty 

Order, Commerce made typographical 

errors with respect to the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin and 

cash deposit rate for Aceitunas 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES