alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000949244
<NAME> ALTERNATE MARKETING NETWORKS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              97
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                        87
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,031
<PP&E>                                             672
<DEPRECIATION>                                     431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,332
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,545)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,522
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,448
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (74)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (77)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (77)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 80**  **54**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. REGINALD ANTHONY FALICE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 3:98

- cr - 00244

- GCM

- 1 )

Submitted : February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Reginald Anthony Falice , Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, U NITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D
. C
. ; Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpubl ished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Reginald Anthony Falice seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order s denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as second or successive and his motion to correct tax assessment
. We dis miss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court ’ s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil cas e is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court ’ s order s w ere entered on the docket

on October 19, 2012, and February 6, 2013 . The notice of appeal was filed on November 7 , 2013
. * Because Falice failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny his motion to appoint counsel and

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 , 276 (19 88).3 dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census Native Hawaiian
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-74 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030 Press kit
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, MAY 2, 2012 Media Advisory — Census Bureau to Release 2010 Census Statistics on Nation's Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Population What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau will hold an online news conference to release a 2010 Census brief on the Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander population in the United States. During the event, Census Bureau statisticians will provide details on the size, growth and geographic distribution of the nation's Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander population as well as provide analysis of the largest detailed Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups. The event will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. A question-and-answer session will follow the presentation. We suggest participants log in and call in early.
 When:
 Tuesday, May 8, 2 p.m. (EDT)
 Who:
 Nicholas Jones, chief, Racial Statistics Branch, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau
Lindsay Hixson, statistician, Racial Statistics Branch, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau
 Details:
 **Audio conference ― access information**
	Toll free number: 888-603-9748
     Participant passcode: NHOPI
     Note: Stay on the line until operator asks for the passcode. Do not key in passcode. **Online presentation ― access information****Please login early, as some setup is required.**
URL: https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/
Conference number: PW5343213
Audience passcode: NHOPI Participants can join the event directly at: <https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join.php?i=PW5343213&p=NHOPI&t=c> If closed captioning is required: <http://livewrite.nccsite.com/view/cb0508> **Online Press Kit:**
<http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/briefs/briefs.html>
 Follow @uscensusbureau on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and Ustream
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6346

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DWAYNE MITCHELL LITTLEJOHN, a/k/a Manson , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Bryson City

. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 2:08

- cr - 0036

- MR

- DLH

- 2 )

Submitted : July 27, 2017 Decided: July 31, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dwayne Mitchell Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Jennifer A. Youngs, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dwayne Mitchell Littlejohn appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
distri ct court. United States v. Littlejohn , No. 2:08

- cr - 0036

- MR

- DLH

- 2 (W.D.N.C.
Mar. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the de cisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

Contact:
John Mejia
SERENA Software
(650) 696-6567
jmejia@serena.com

              SERENA SOFTWARE ACQUIRES COMPLETE RIGHTS TO STARTOOL
                   ACQUISITION SECURES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

BURLINGAME, CA--(SEPTEMBER 5, 2000)--SERENA Software, Inc. (Nasdaq: SRNA), an
industry-leading supplier of eBusiness infrastructure change management
solutions, today announced the acquisition of the intellectual property rights
to StarTool-Registered Trademark-, SERENA's popular file and data management
solution for enterprise legacy systems. Today's announcement is a strategic move
by SERENA giving it greater control and flexibility over its StarTool product.

    StarTool is used by organizations that are committed to installing a robust
backend technology infrastructure for conducting eBusiness. StarTool provides a
comprehensive and easy-to-use environment for editing and managing PDS, PDSE,
sequential, extended sequential, direct, VSAM, DB2 and IMS files.

    "We now own the intellectual property rights to all of our products, so we
can move more quickly to capitalize on our eFull.Cycle-TM- strategy", said
MarkWoodward, president and chief executive officer, SERENA Software, Inc. "We
gain additional leverage in pursuing the large market opportunity associated
with StarTool. Finally, this transaction allows us to sell these products
without recording royalty expense to the former owner."

ABOUT SERENA SOFTWARE

    SERENA Software, Inc. is an industry leading provider of software
infrastructure products and consulting best practices that automate enterprise
software and Web content changes. SERENA's EFull.Cycle manages the change
process throughout the entire eBusiness lifecycle, across multiple
platforms--from the mainframe to the Web. SERENA maintains a global presence
with headquarters in Burlingame, California, international offices in Canada,
France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, and a network of international
distributors for local support and service. SERENA products are used at over
2,500 customer sites, including 84% of the Fortune 50. SERENA can be reached
through the World Wide Web at www.serena.com.

                                      ###

StarTool is a registered trademark of SERENA Software, Inc. EFull.Cycle is a
trademark of SERENA Software, Inc. All other products or company names are used
for identification purposes only, and may be trademarks of their respective
owners.

Copyright -C- 2000 SERENA Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Back to Contents

 

| **EXHIBIT 23.1** |
|------------------|

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-75420, 333-75422, 333-39690, 333-42753, 333-00537, 033-60169, 033-69922 and 033-33373 on Form S-8 of our report dated September 13, 2006 (which report expressed an unqualifiedopinion and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*), relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Datascope Corp. and of our reportdated September 13, 2006, relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, each appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Datascope Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2006.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPParsippany, New JerseySeptember 13, 2006

----
# C_2013036EN.01001201.xml

| 8.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6405 — Banco Santander/Rainbow)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 36/04

On 29 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6405. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6405. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Nidaal Jubran 

Nidaal Jubran works in the Automated Export System Branch and conducts a number of webinars, software demos, and AES compliance seminars and workshops in support of the U.S. Census Bureau's ongoing outreach efforts to the trade community.  In addition, Jubran assists exporters and forwarders with their export transactions in the AES, helping to resolve fatal errors and reporting problems.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### Roberta Libson, Plaintiff, *v.*Joseph Novack, Doing Business as Laurels Bungalows, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

July 28, 1953.

*David H. Storper*for plaintiff.

*Morris Turetsky*for defendant.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff to examine the defendant before trial in a negligence action. The only issue is as to the time and place for the taking of the deposition.

The defendant maintains an office for the regular transaction of his business in New York County; that is where the plaintiff seeks to conduct the examination. And the plaintiff wishes to proceed with the pretrial deposition at the present time. On the other hand, the defendant urges that he is a resident of Sullivan County, actively operating and managing a large bungalow and hotel colony there, which employs about 300 persons, and accommodates approximately 1,200 guests; and that since the present is *“*his busy season ”, it would be an *490undue hardship to require him to attend now in New York City. He consents to the examination, but urges- that it be held in Sullivan County.

The facts here point up the distinction I sought to make in *Lowenberg*v. *Stafford,*(204 Misc. 487), decided simultaneously herewith. If the plaintiff insists upon an immediate examination, it will be held in Sullivan County. Otherwise, the defendant will be directed to appear in New York County, but during the month of October, 1953. Settle order (Civ. Prac. Act, § 300).
#### Robert SESSOMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-17.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 5, 1970.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is'affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2

Independent Auditors Consent

The
Board of Directors
SMTEK International, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-02969 and 333-31349) on Form S-3 of SMTEK International, Inc.
and the registration statements (Nos. 333-74400, 333-08689, 333-72139, 333-44612, 333-49954 and 333-49956) on
Form S-8 of our report dated August 16, 2002, except for the fourth paragraph of note 5 to the consolidated financial statements which is as of September 25,
2002, and except for the restatement for discontintinued operations as described in the second paragraph of note 3 to the 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements, which is as of
September 24, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of SMTEK International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, which report appears in the June 30, 2003 annual report on
Form 10-K of SMTEK International, Inc.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Los
Angeles, California
September 24, 2003

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of APAC Customer Services, Inc.(the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Robert J. Keller, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and George H.Hepburn III, as  Chief Financial Officerof the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to hisknowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 
| /s/ Robert J.  Keller                                     |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                      |
| Name: Robert J.  Keller                                   |
| Title: Chief  Executive Officer                           |
| Date:  November 10, 2005                             |
|                                                      |
| /s/ George H.  Hepburn III                                |   |
|                                                      |
| Name: George H.  Hepburn III                              |
| Title: Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:  November 10, 2005                             |

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7917

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BYRON KEITH COLLINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-91-312, CA-01-2729-1-22) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 28, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Byron Keith Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Byron Keith Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). Because Collins failed to obtain authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255 motion, the district court properly denied the motion. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Collins , Nos. CR-91-312; CA-01-2729-1-22 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 17, 2001; entered Oct. 18, 2001); see also United States v. Sanders , 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , U.S. , 122 S. Ct. 573 (2001) (holding claims pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), are not cognizable on collateral review). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2013031EN.01000601.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6671 — LBO France/Aviapartner)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 31/03

On 30 November 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6671. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6671. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---