alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases American Community Survey (ACS)
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-170 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030 Press kit
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, SEPT. 10, 2012 Media Advisory — Census Bureau to Host Prerelease Web Conference on 2011 American Community Survey Estimates What:
 The Census Bureau will hold a Web conference to discuss the Sept. 20 release of 2011 American Community Survey estimates. The webinar will include guidance on how to access and use the upcoming one-year estimates and a question-and-answer session. Embargo subscribers will have access to the estimates beginning Tuesday, Sept. 18. The American Community Survey produces estimates for numerous social, economic and housing characteristics including language, education, commuting, employment, mortgage status and rent, as well as income, poverty and health insurance. Estimates will be available for the nation, all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, every congressional district, every metropolitan area, and all counties and places with populations of 65,000 or more. The Web conference will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. Reporters will be able to ask questions once the presentation is complete.
 When:
 Monday, Sept. 17, 1 p.m. EDT
 Who:
 Scott Boggess, chief, American Community Survey Coordination Staff, Social, Economic and Housing Statistics Division
 Access:
 **Audio conference access information**
  Toll free number: 800-857-4620
  Participant passcode: CENSUS
  Questions and answers are limited to media **Online presentation access information**
  Please log in early, as some setup is required.
  URL: <https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/>
  Conference number: PW1025597
  Audience passcode: CENSUS
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1223

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Raymone Deshawn Walker, Sr. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ Submitted: June 6, 2023 Filed: June 9, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Raymone Walker, Sr. appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 24 months in prison and 6 months of supervised release.

1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the

sentence. After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Walker, as it properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors; and the sentence was within the advisory Guidelines range and below the statutory limit. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (maximum revocation prison term is 2 years for Class C felony; maximum supervised release term is 3 years, less any previous and current revocation prison terms); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence is reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard); see also United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004) (district court need not mechanically list every § 3553(a) factor when sentencing defendant upon revocation; all that is required is consideration of relevant matters and some reason for court’s decision). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

HANNAFORD ACQUISITION COMPLETED
07/31/2000

Salisbury, N.C. -- Delhaize America Inc. (NYSE: DZA, DZB) today announced that
it has completed its previously announced acquisition of Hannaford Bros. Co.

Hannaford Bros. is now the third wholly-owned subsidiary of Delhaize America,
which also owns Salisbury, N.C.-based Food Lion, L.L.C. and Tampa, Fla.-based
Kash n' Karry. With more than 1,400 stores from Maine to Florida today, Delhaize
America is the fifth largest grocery retailer in the nation.

CONTACTS

Media - Tawn Earnest, (704) 633-8250, ext. 2185
Investors - David Hogan, (704) 633-8250, ext. 2529
#### BUNEL OF NEW ORLEANS, INC. v. Elton A. CIGALI.

No. 60568.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: Bunel of New Orleans, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 348 So.2d 993.

Denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 22, 2018

Order 

Clerk

August 22, 2018

156823(53)

FRED PAQUIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 156823

v COA: 334350 

Mackinac CC: 2015-007789-CZ

CITY OF ST. IGNACE,

Defendant-Appellee, 

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Intervening Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of intervening appellee to extend the time 

for filing its supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as 

timely filed if submitted on or before September 25, 2018.
Exhibit 10.10


 


SECOND
AMENDMENT TO


SUBORDINATED
PROMISORY NOTE


DATED
NOVEMBER 1, 2018


 


WHEREAS ECOMMERCE FUNDING LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“Maker”)
and SWL INVESTMENTS LP, an Oklahoma limited partnership (“Holder”) entered into a subordinated note agreement (the “Note”)
on November 1, 2018 for the principal amount of $500,000; and


 


WHEREAS A First Amendment to Subordinated Note was entered into on
April 1, 2019 whereby the principal amount of the note was increased from $500,000 to $1,500,000; and


 


WHEREAS Maker has need for funds in addition to
that amount provided by the Note; it is


 


AGREED by both the Maker and Holder that the principal amount of the
Note be amended to increase the principal amount of the Note from $1,500,000, as amended on April 1, 2019 to $2,200,000, with the same
terms and conditions as stated in the original note.


 


This Amendment to the Note is hereby approved with an effective date
of January 1, 2022.


 


	 	“Maker” 
	 	eCommerce Funding LLC
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Keith
    L. Merrell
	 	 	 
	 	Name: 	Keith L. Merrell
	 	 	 
	 	Title:	CFO
	 	 	 
	 	“Holder”
	 	SWL Investments LP
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ S.Whitfield
    Lee
	 	 	 
	 	Name: 	S.Whitfield
    Lee
	 	 	 
	 	Title:	President
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 2050

_____________________________ A MY D IANA L AVANDIER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. William F. Stone , Judge

. September 14, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
K ELSEY , J AY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 4.7**

----

**PERSONAL**

Clay BrendishThe StablesHorseshoe HouseLondon RoadSunninghillAscotBerkshireSL5 7SE

21 June 2005

Dear Clay,

I am writing to confirm that the Board has agreed to extend your appointmentfor three years from 1 September 2005. Your appointment will continue in allother respects on the terms set out in your letter of appointment dated 16 December2003 including, in particular, that either you or the Board may give the otherat least three months’ written notice to terminate the appointment at anytime.

Please sign the attached copy of this letter to confirm your acceptance of thisextension on the above terms and return the copy to me.

 

Yours sincerely,

/s/ Larry Stone

**L W STONE**

----

|            |              |
|-----------------|-------------------|
| To:   | Larry Stone       |
|            | Company Secretary |

I accept this extension of my    appointment on the above terms.

| /s/ Clay Brendish |  | 27th June  2005 |   |
|-------------------|--|-----------------|--------|
|                   |  |                 |   |
| Clay Brendish     |  | Date            |   |

 

| **Larry Stone**Company Secretary      BT Group      BT Centre      81 Newgate Street      London EC1A 7AJ      United Kingdom | **tel****fax****mob****e-mail ** | +44 (0)20 7356 5237      +44 (0)20 7356 6135      +44 (0)7740 136290      larry.stone@bt.com**** | **BT Group plc**      Registered Office:      81 Newgate Street, London EC1A 7AJ      Registered in England and Wales no. 4190816**www.bt.com** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### Jacquelyn C. STARKS v. RICHARD’S FORD, INC., et al.

No. 61279.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Jacquelyn C. Starks applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ not considered. No rehearing applied for as court of appeal judgment is final.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.114**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office								301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)	301-457-1037 (TDD)	e-mail: 2000usa@census.gov	Statistical Information Staff	Population Division	301-457-2422	e-mail: pop@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12:01 A.M. EDT, MAY 23, 2001 (WEDNESDAY)

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Demographic Profile for Washington

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the *Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000* for Washington, a one-page table providing Census 2000 data on age and sex distribution, race, Hispanic origin, household relationship and type, housing occupancy and tenure (whether the housing occupant owns or rents).

 The profile includes nearly 100 data items in all, plus percentage distributions.

 In addition to the profile of the state as a whole, similar demographic profiles for counties, places and other geographic components of the state can be accessed on an embargoed basis at <https://www.census.gov/dcmd/www/embargo/embargo_demoprofile.html>. After the release time, go to the Census Bureau's online search-and-retrieval database *American FactFinder*http://factfinder2.census.gov or to its Demographic Profile Page <https://www.census.gov/census2000/demoprofile.html>. You will also be able to download the profiles from the bureau's file transfer protocol site <http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/>.

 For information about how to order paper copies of Census 2000 demographic profiles, contact Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, 301-457-4100; or e-mail:<webmaster@census.gov>.

 For local context, contact the Washington State Data Center, 360-902-0599; e-mail: <yi.zhao@fm.wa.gov>.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### Peter KARTIKES, James Zabetias, Michael Mackaronis and George Kartikes, Jr., Appellants, v. Angelo DEMOS, Appellee.

No. 67-795.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 25, 1968.

Rehearing Denied July. 24, 1968.

Robert J. Ramer, Miami, for appellants.

Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell and J. F. Dougherty, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants suffered a dismissal of their second amended complaint without leave to further amend. They had sought compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged malpractice of defendant-appellee, Demos, an attorney. The record brought to this court consists of the second amended complaint, the motion to dismiss that complaint, and the final judgment of dismissal. We reverse.

We hold that the complaint states a cause of action under the principle set out in Messana v. Maule Industries, Fla.1951, 50 So.2d 874, 876. We also continue to follow the rule in Weekley v. Knight, 116 Fla. 721, 156 So. 625 (1934), and Solomon v. Meyer, Fla.App. 1959, 116 So.2d 37: A client has a cause of action in contract against an attorney who neglects to perform services he explicitly or implicitly *87agreed to perform when he agreed to be employed by the client.

We expressly reject appellants’ proposition that the allegations of a complaint against an attorney for malpractice need contain only legal conclusions rather than ultimate facts, as in certain types of automobile negligence actions. See Form 1.945, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (1967), 31 F.S.A. We simply hold that the allegations of appellants’ second amended complaint, if proved, are sufficient to show a breach of the duty owed by the attorney to his client under the circumstances set forth in the complaint.

The complaint does contain legal conclusions and surplusage. We therefore reverse with directions to enter an order granting the appellant an opportunity to file a third amended complaint. Appellee suggests that this procedure is incorrect because, since there was no substantial difference between the allegations of the first amended complaint and the allegations of the second amended complaint, it was proper for the circuit court to dismiss the second amended complaint without leave to amend for failure to obey an order of the court. See Warriner v. Ferraro, Fla.App. 1965, 177 So.2d 723, cert. denied, Fla., 188 So.2d 319, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 995, 85 S. Ct. 610, 17 L.Ed.2d 454. We must reject this argument because the appellee did not see fit to supplement the record by cross-directing the clerk of the circuit court to include a copy of the first amended complaint in the record so that this court might take the allegations of that complaint into consideration.

Reversed and remanded with directions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10490]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Barbara Eisenbeiss, PM/DDTC, SA-1, 12th Floor, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0112; telephone (202) 663-2835 or email                         *DTAG@state.gov.*

Anthony M. Dearth,

Alternate Designated Federal Officer, Defense Trade Advisory Group, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-17085 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7



December 16, 1999



Mr. Howard Hayakawa
6115 159th Street SE
Snohomish, WA 98296


Dear Howard,

We are very pleased to offer you the position of Executive Vice President Data
Dimensions Test Centers with Data Dimensions, Inc. (DDI). We hope that you would
be able to start in your new position on January 3, 2000.

Your compensation package will consist of:

-   Monthly salary of $13,333.33 paid in accordance with our payroll schedule,
    which is currently biweekly. This is an exempt position as classified by the
    Fair Labor Standard Act and is not eligible for overtime pay for hours
    worked in excess of forty per week.

-   Options to acquire 100,000 shares of Data Dimensions, Inc. stock in
    accordance with our Incentive Stock Option Program. These options will be
    priced at the fair market value at the close of business the day prior to
    your start date.

-   Your 2000 bonus will be 50% of your base salary ($80,000) which we will make
    $30,000 available to you upon hire.

-   You will be eligible for benefits in accordance with the DDI benefit plans
    commensurate with your position.

Your employment with DDI is voluntarily entered into and you may resign at any
time. Similarly, DDI is free to end the employment relationship at any time with
or without notice or cause, where it believes it is in DDI's best interest to do
so. This relationship is and will always be one of voluntary employment,
terminable at will.

Howard, I look forward to continue working with you to make our company the
industry leader.

Sincerely,


Peter A. Allen
President and
Chief Executive Officer
#### Michael J. BELL, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-117.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 19, 1971.

Habeas corpus dismissal.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00323

- CV
In re The Commitment of George Olivarez
On Appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022DCV

- 2249

- E

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. No costs ar e assessed , as appellant file d an affid avit of in ability to pay costs. We further order this deci sion certified below for obser vance. July 5, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1919 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1919

  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 14, 2014

Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Lee, Mr. Tester, 
Mr. Merkley, Ms. Warren, and Mr. Murphy) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST 
              IRAQ.

    (a) Repeal.--The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 
Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243; 116 Stat. 1498; 50 U.S.C. 
1541 note) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed as limiting or prohibiting any authority of the President 
to--
            (1) provide security for United States facilities, military 
        assets, or military or diplomatic personnel located in Iraq; or
            (2) gather, provide, and share intelligence with the 
        Government of Iraq if the President determines it to be in the 
        national security interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```