alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10(iii)A(12)



Acuity Brands, Inc.
Compensation for Non-Employee Directors
(As of January 2022)


Annual Retainer
						
	Cash Portion	$80,000
	Non-Cash Portion	$145,000


Annual Committee Chair Retainers
						
	Audit Committee	$15,000
	Compensation Committee	$15,000
	Nominating and Governance Committee/Lead Director	$25,000


Additional Meeting Fees
						
	Board Meeting Fee (for each meeting attended in excess of 6 meetings)	$2,000
	Committee Meeting Fee (for each meeting attended in excess of 6 meetings)	$1,500


The annual retainer, including any committee chair retainer, is payable in a single payment after the annual meeting at which the director is elected by stockholders for a one-year term. Additional meeting fees, when earned, are paid in cash in September following the completion of the fiscal year by which the number of meetings attended is determined. Each director may elect the form of payment for each portion of their annual retainer, subject, in some cases, to our Stock Ownership Guidelines (available at www.acuitybrands.com at For Investors - Governance – Committee Charters & Governance Documents.
Cash Portion: Each director may elect to have the Cash Portion either paid in cash or deferred into the Amended and Restated 2011 Director Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Amended 2011 NEDC"). Amounts deferred into the Amended 2011 NEDC may be credited into either an interest-bearing cash fund or into a stock unit fund. The value of the stock unit fund mirrors the value of the Company's common stock and earns cash dividends that are credited to the interest-bearing cash fund. 
Non-Cash Portion: Each director may elect to have the Non-Cash Portion paid in either a restricted stock award ("RSA") or deferred restricted stock unit award ("DSU") pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2012 Omnibus Stock Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Omnibus Incentive Plan") if they have exceeded the Stock Ownership Guidelines requirement. Prior to exceeding the Stock Ownership Guidelines requirement, the Non-Cash Portion will be paid in the form of a DSU. RSAs and DSUs become fully vested on the first anniversary of the grant date, or, if earlier, the date of the next subsequent annual meeting of stockholders. Both RSAs and DSUs earn dividend equivalents during the vesting period at a rate equal to the dividends paid to other holders of our common stock if and when declared. DSUs continue to earn dividend equivalents until such time as they are distributed, and such earned dividend equivalents receive interest at the same rate as dividend equivalents earned on deferred stock units under the Amended 2011 NEDC. When a director ceases service with the Company during the one-year vesting period, the total number of shares earned will be prorated based on the ratio of the total number of days served to the number of days in the vesting period. Any awards not earned will be forfeited effective as of the date the director's service ends.
1
# C_2012300EN.01000201.xml

| 5.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6688 — KKR/Württembergische Metallwaren Fabrik)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 300/03

On 4 September 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6688. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6688. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Iridium
LLC's financial statements for the year ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0000948421
<NAME>IRIDIUM LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         192,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,214
<PP&E>                                       3,546,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                 227,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,628,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          557,783
<BONDS>                                      1,340,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     41,354
<COMMON>                                     2,029,079
<OTHER-SE>                                   (633,007)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,628,338
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               168,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (203,566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (203,566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (203,566)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.28)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2909 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2909

To provide that section 6248 of title 10, United States Code, shall not 
      apply to an award of the Medal of Honor to Richard G. Perez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1993

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that section 6248 of title 10, United States Code, shall not 
      apply to an award of the Medal of Honor to Richard G. Perez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That (a) notwithstanding section 6248 of title 10, United States Code 
(relating to time limitations in awards of certain medals to members of 
the naval service), the President is authorized to award the Medal of 
Honor in the name of Congress under section 6241 of such title to 
Richard G. Perez (service number 2251881), for acts of gallantry and 
intrepidity while serving in the United States Marine Corps on January 
7, 1967, in the Republic of Viet Nam.
    (b) The President is requested to provide an opportunity for 
Richard G. Perez to present evidence showing why he should be awarded 
the Medal of Honor.

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6050
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL A. EDWARDS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-94-147-MU, CA-96-197-3-MU) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Edwards , Nos. CR-94-147-MU; CA-96- 197-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Cray Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certify, to such officers' knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 8, 2006

                                       /s/ PETER J. UNGARO
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Peter J. Ungaro
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President

                                       /s/ BRIAN C. HENRY
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Brian C. Henry
                                           Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.
CORNING NATURAL GAS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended September 30, 1999 and 1998

                                            1999              1998
Cash flows from operating activities:
 Net income                          $   437,948            640,157
 Adjustments to reconcile net income
  to net cash provided by operating
  activities:
   Depreciation and amortizaiton         895,280            837,151
   Gain on sale of marketable sec        (25,375)           (31,592)
   Deferred income taxes                 105,415            (86,301)

 Changes in assets and liablilities:
  (Increase)decrease in:
   Accounts receivable                   (845,391)          (43,309)
   Gas stored underground               1,405,077          (192,045)
   Gas and appliance inventories          (52,583)           59,951
   Prepaid expenses                       108,755            69,258
   Unrecovered gas costs                  191,819          (158,886)
   Prepaid income taxes                  (311,380)          436,838
   Deferred cgarges-pension/other        (198,012)         (144,719)
   Other assets & longterm debt iss        22,397          (156,013)
  Increase(decrease in:
   Accounts Payable                       137,452          (413,922)
   Accrued general taxes                  (53,178)           14,426
   Supplier refunds due customers         198,131          (310,263)
   Other liabilities and def credits      265,834           419,813
                                          --------         ---------
   Net cash provided by op activities   2,282,189           940,544
                                       -----------         ---------
 Cash flows from investing activities:
  Purchase of securities available
   for sale, net                         (172,719)        (118,861)
  Acquisitions of businesses, net of
   cash acquired                         (600,907)       (1,407,068)
  Capital expenditures, net of minor
    disposals                          (1,150,718)       (1,270,305)
                                       -----------      ------------
   Net cash used in investing activi   (1,924,344)       (2,796,234)
                                       -----------      ------------
 Cash flows from financing activities:
  Net borrowings(repaymts)line-of-cred   (160,000)         1,550,000
  Dividends paid                         (598,000)          (598,000)
  Borrowings under long-term debt agmt    468,334            940,000
  Repayment of long-term debt            (146,818)           (14,635)
                                        ----------      --------------
    Net cash provided(used)by
    financing activities                 (436,484)        1,877,364
                                        -----------     -------------
    Net increase(decrease)in cash         (78,639)           21,674

Cash at beginning of year                 284,426           262,752
                                        ----------      -----------
# C_2013134EN.01000701.xml

| 14.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 May 2013

2013/C 134/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2988 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,455 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8443 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5511 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,243 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,526 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,808 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 293,18 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6998 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1435 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3298 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3403 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2978 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3113 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0793 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5623 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,607 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 436,5 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,8092 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9782 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5713 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 645,9 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8799 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,44 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,745 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,678 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6244 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,6689 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,311 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2988

JPY

Japanese yen

131,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,455

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8443

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5511

CHF

Swiss franc

1,243

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,526

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,808

HUF

Hungarian forint

293,18

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6998

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1435

RON

Romanian leu

4,3298

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3403

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2978

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3113

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0793

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5623

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,607

KRW

South Korean won

1 436,5

ZAR

South African rand

11,8092

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9782

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5713

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 645,9

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8799

PHP

Philippine peso

53,44

RUB

Russian rouble

40,745

THB

Thai baht

38,678

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6244

MXN

Mexican peso

15,6689

INR

Indian rupee

71,311

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0201

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

STEPHEN THOMAS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable John C. Brown, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 12 2020

08/12/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0201
#### Robert Marshall BILLINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 8, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2011358EN.01000701.xml

| 8.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 December 2011

2011/C 358/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3377 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4345 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85745 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0149 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2413 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6935 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,328 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 300,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6978 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4715 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3455 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4529 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3043 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3517 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3994 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7193 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7211 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 512,52 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,8165 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4905 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5115 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 081,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1850 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,977 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,8150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,255 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4018 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0790 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,1820 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3377

JPY

Japanese yen

103,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4345

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85745

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0149

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2413

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6935

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,328

HUF

Hungarian forint

300,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6978

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4715

RON

Romanian leu

4,3455

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4529

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3043

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3517

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3994

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7193

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7211

KRW

South Korean won

1 512,52

ZAR

South African rand

10,8165

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4905

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5115

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 081,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1850

PHP

Philippine peso

57,977

RUB

Russian rouble

41,8150

THB

Thai baht

41,255

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4018

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0790

INR

Indian rupee

69,1820

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CPI Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending
February 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
J. David Pierson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Subsection 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Subsection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly present,
in all material respects, the financial condition and the
results of operations of the Company.



By:  /s/ J. David Pierson
     --------------------------
         J. David Pierson
         Chief Executive Officer
         May 12, 2003
#### B. Roy GIBSON, Jr., and St. Joseph Telephone and Telegraph Company, a corporation under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellants, v. Joseph A. MALONEY, d/b/a the Apalachicola Times, Appellee.

No. J-145.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 27, 1968.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 7, 1968.

Starry & Thompson, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants seek review of a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding plaintiff-appellee compensatory and punitive damages in a libel and slander action. Damages forming the basis of this action were sustained, so found the jury, when the individual defendant made a speech before a civic club in Port St. Joe, and the corporate defendant printed and distributed copies of the speech to all of its telephone subscribers.

The defamatory matter complained of, in substance, stated that Apalachicola was the only exchange of the company that showed any loss in the number of telephones, and that such loss was attributed largely to the local newspaper and its publisher (appellee herein) who was accused of taking pleasure in berating and abusing any business interest in the community, particularly including the duPont estate interests; it was further said of the publisher that in some instances he stated outright falsehoods about the du-Pont estate interests.

As reversible error, appellants urge the trial court’s refusal to give certain requested instructions setting forth the need to find malice in the making of a statement to which a qualified privilege attaches. Our. review of the record and the instructions given to the jury by the court convinces us that the law in this particular instance was adequately stated to the jury in the court’s instructions, and no^ reversible error has been shown in this respect.

*90The remaining point upon which appellants rely for reversal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict for both compensatory and punitive damages. We cannot say on the basis of the record before us that the jury’s verdict was not supported by competent evidence. The test to be applied is not what an appellate court would have decided had they tried the case, but whether or not they can say after reviewing the case that the jury, as reasonable men, could not have found the verdict which they did. See Abraham Used Car Company v. Silva, Fla.App., 208 So.2d 500.

Appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower •court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD IC., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.