alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013296EN.01001601.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/16

---

Corrigendum to the call for proposals ‘Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy (CAP)’ for 2014

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 264 of 13 September 2013
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 264 of 13 September 2013

2013/C 296/07

On page 11, point 1, second paragraph:

for:

‘... between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2015.’,

read:

‘... between 1 May 2014 and 30 April 2015.’;

on page 19, point 14, 11th paragraph, ‘Electronic submission’:

for:

‘... by e-mail to agri-applications@ec.europa.eu ...’,

read:

‘... by e-mail to agri-grants-applications-only@ec.europa.eu ...’;

on page 19, point 14, 11th paragraph ‘Electronic submission’:

for:

‘... 15 November 2013 at 24.00.’,

read:

‘... 30 November 2013 at 24.00.’.

---
<TABLE>
                                       EXHIBIT 12

                         PHARMACIA & UPJOHN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (U.S. dollar amounts in millions)


<CAPTION>
                                      Six Months          Year Ended December 31,
                                        Ended
                                    June 30, 1998    1997    1996    1995    1994    1993
                                    --------------   ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
<S>                                    <C>          <C>     <C>    <C>     <C>     <C>
Earnings from continuing 
 operations before income taxes        $ 493        $ 468   $ 838  $1,136  $1,271  $  778

Less: Equity in undistributed 
 net income (loss) of companies 
 owned less than 50%                      21          (32)      5       7       8       8
                                       --------     -----  ------  ------  ------  ------
                                         472          500     833   1,129   1,263     770

Add:
 Amortization of previously 
   capitalized interest                    5           12      11      10       8       6

 Fixed charges included in the above:
   Interest and amortization of debt 
   expense                                23           58*     82     121     139     209

 Rental expense representative 
  of an interest factor                   20           38      37      35      35      32
                                       --------     -----  ------  ------  ------  ------
Earnings from continuing operations  
 before income taxes and fixed 
 charges                               $ 520        $ 608*  $ 963  $1,295  $1,445  $1,017
                                       ========     =====  ======  ======  ======  ======
Interest incurred and amortization 
 of debt expense                       $  39        $  90   $ 115  $  149  $  164  $  234

Rental expense representative of an 
 interest factor                          20           38      37      35      35      32
                                       --------     -----  ------  ------  ------  ------

Total fixed charges                    $  59        $ 128   $ 152  $  184  $  199  $  266
                                       ========     =====  ======  ====== =======  ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       8.8          4.8*    6.2     7.0     7.2     3.8
                                       =====         ====    ====    ====    ====    ====


*Revised from Form 10-K.
</TABLE>
# C_2013196EN.01000201.xml

| 9.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 July 2013

2013/C 196/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2850 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4594 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86160 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7898 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2404 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9650 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,938 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 294,52 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7021 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2959 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4483 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5025 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4145 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3567 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9662 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6573 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6470 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 475,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0845 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8818 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5180 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 793,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1144 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,129 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,7520 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,413 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8916 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7461 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,0700 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2850

JPY

Japanese yen

130,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4594

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86160

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7898

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2404

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9650

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,938

HUF

Hungarian forint

294,52

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7021

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2959

RON

Romanian leu

4,4483

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5025

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4145

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3567

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9662

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6573

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6470

KRW

South Korean won

1 475,65

ZAR

South African rand

13,0845

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8818

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5180

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 793,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1144

PHP

Philippine peso

56,129

RUB

Russian rouble

42,7520

THB

Thai baht

40,413

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8916

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7461

INR

Indian rupee

78,0700

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Education Foreign-Born Population
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.46 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, NOV. 17, 2011 The Foreign-Born with Science and Engineering Degrees: 2010 This brief, based on 2010 American Community Survey estimates, examines patterns of science and engineering educational attainment among the foreign-born population, with attainment of specific science and engineering degree types by place of birth and sex, as well as metropolitan statistical area. It also compares attainment of such degrees by the foreign-born and native-born populations. Highlights: In 2010, 48.5 million (28 percent) of the 170.7 million native-born population 25 and older and 9.1 million (27 percent) of the 33.6 million foreign-born population 25 and older had a bachelor's degree or higher.

Foreign-born residents represented 33 percent of all bachelor's degree holders in engineering fields, 27 percent in computers, mathematics and statistics; 24 percent in physical sciences; and 17 percent in biological, agricultural and environmental sciences.

Of the 4.2 million foreign-born science and engineering bachelor's degree holders in the U.S., 57 percent were born in Asia, 18 percent in Europe, 16 percent in Latin America and the Caribbean, 5 percent in Africa, 3 percent in Northern America and less than 1 percent in Oceania.

The majority (64 percent) of foreign-born residents with degrees in computers, mathematics and statistics were born in Asia, including 24 percent who were born in India and 14 percent who were born in China.

Overall, only 7 percent of foreign-born residents with science and engineering degrees had majored in psychology.

Of the 9.1 million foreign-born residents 25 and older with bachelor's degrees, 51 percent were female. However, only 37 percent of the 4.2 million foreign-born residents with science and engineering degrees were female.

Looking at areas with a foreign-born population greater than 100,000, the highest proportion of foreign-born residents with science and engineering degrees was in the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. metro area (29 percent), followed by the Baltimore-Towson, Md. metro area (24 percent). Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acsbr10-06.pdf>. [PDF] **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
The Honorable Susan L. Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation 

and International Affairs 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Essential Air Service to Pierre, South Dakota 

Dear Assistant Secretary Kurland: 

This is a letter of recommendation from the City of Pierre, South Dakota, to 

award an Essential Air Service (EAS) contract to Aerodynamics Incorporated (ADI). 

Thank you for issuing the request for EAS proposals for the City of Pierre, and thank 

you for granting a time extension to review and research the three proposals submitted 

by Aerodynamics Incorporated (AD I), Boutique Air, and Great Lakes Aviation. 

All three carriers were invited to interview in Pierre with a group of city 

representatives and local citizens. The interviews included a tour of the companies' 

respective aircraft and a discussion of detailed questions. Additional follow up with the 

carriers and city officials in Scottsbluff, North Platte, and Kearney, Nebraska, helped 

form our recommendation. 

After careful consideration, the City Commission voted unanimously to 

recommend ADI - Option 2 with one-stop service in Scottsbluff, Nebraska. While ADI is 

essentially unproven in Part 121 scheduled air service, we fully believe they have the 

ability to provide reliable scheduled air service based upon their proposed business plan 

and responses to the interview questions. 

The City of Pierre recognizes that Great Lakes President Doug Voss and CEO 

Chuck Howell treated Pierre better than any other cities they serve, and they helped 

divert a number of cancellations or suspended service altogether. However, 2014 

passenger enplanements in Pierre will still be the worst year on record since records 

were first kept in1978. The amount of cancellations and delayed flights in 2014 will 

potentially cause Pierre Regional Airport (PIR) to lose its Primary Airport status. 

Furthermore, Great Lakes Aviation did not convince the City during their EAS interview 

that the issues causing cancellations and delays in 2014 would be resolved in 2015. 

222 East Dakota • PO Box 1253 

Pierre, South Dakota 57501 -1253 

http:/ /ci. pierre ,sd. sd. us 

(605)773-7407 or (605)773-7341 , Fax (605)773-7406 
establish an EAS subsidy. Without it, air service from South Dakota

s Capital city would 

continue its recent trend of substandard service and diminishing emplanements. 

Cc: Sen. Tim Johnson 

Sen. John Thune 

Rep. Kristi Noem 

Sine=,~~ 

~eR.Gill 

Mayor 

City of Pierre 

Senator-Elect M. Michael Rounds 

Kevin Schlemmer 

Docket OST 2011-0138 

222 East Dakota • PO Box 1253 

Pierre, South Dakota 57501-1253 

http://ci. pierre ,sd .sd. us 

(605)773-7407 or (605)773-7341 , Fax (605)773-7406
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate Dis trict of Texas

at For t Wor th

_____ ______________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00324

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 342nd Di str ict Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 342

- 332546

- 22

Befor e Sud derth, C .J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ

. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker 

### P HILIP 

### H EARL 

### T HOMPSON 

### H AMILTON 

### , Appellant

V



### . J OHN 

### J ENSEN 

### , J ENSEN 

### & J ENSEN 

### , P.C., D ONALD 

### C. N EMEC 

### , K RISTINA 

### W HITTENBUR G 

### , A ND 

### L AW 

### O FFICE OF 

### K.R. W HI TTENBURG 

### P.L.L.C. , Ap pelle es2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Phil ip Hearl Thompson Hamilton attempts to appeal from the trial

court ’ s orders g ranting summary judgme nt that dismissed Ham ilto n ’ s claims agains t Ap pellees John Jensen , Jensen & Jensen, P .C. , Kristina Whittenburg, a nd Law Office
of K

. R

. Whittenburg , P.L.L.C. O n Octo ber 9, 2023, we notified th e parties of our concern that we may not h ave ju risdiction over this appeal becaus e the trial court ’ s orders do not appear to be a final judgment or appealable interlocutory orders

. We
informed the m that unless any par ty desiring to continue the appeal filed a response

w ith the court on or befor e October 19, 2023, s howing ground s for continuing the appeal, we might dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a)

. We
received no response. We have jurisdiction to consider appeals only from final judgments and from
certain interlo cutory orders made immedia tely appealable by statute. See Lehmann v.
Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (stating that “t he gene ral rule, with a few mostly statutory exceptions, is that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment ” ); see al

so Tex. Civ. P rac. & Rem. C ode Ann. § 51.014(a) ( delineating interlocutory orders f

rom which a party may appeal )

. Unless a statutory exception applies , an order that does not dispose of a ll pending parties and claims remains interlocutory and unapp ealable until the tri al court sign s a final judgment. See
Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195 ; City of Blue Mound v. Sw. Water Co. , No. 02

- 13

- 00255

- CV, 2013 WL 4679953, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Aug. 29, 2013, no pet.)

.3

Here, the trial cour t ’ s orders granting s ummary j udgment are n ot final and appealable because they do not dispose of the claims pending against Appellee
Donald C. Nemec , a nd no statutory exception ap pl ies to allow for an interlocutory appeal in th is case

. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.3( a), 43.2(f). /s/ Brian Walker
B rian Walker J ustice
Delivered: December 14, 2023
#### Kenneth Garland LOVERN v. Leroy HOBBS, Sheriff of Harrison County.

No. 47500.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 1, 1973.

Robert M. Acevedo, Biloxi, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Edwin A. Snyder, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and SUGG, JJ-

Appeal from County Court, Harrison County; Gaston H. Hewes, County Judge.

Affirmed.
# C_2012019EN.01000701.xml

| 24.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 January 2012

2012/C 19/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3017 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4358 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83625 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7791 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2061 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6645 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,349 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 301,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6986 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2853 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3423 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3690 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2332 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3129 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1013 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6008 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6478 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 471,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3027 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2179 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5703 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 644,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0130 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,344 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3340 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,860 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2825 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0627 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,0780 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3017

JPY

Japanese yen

100,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4358

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83625

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7791

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2061

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6645

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,349

HUF

Hungarian forint

301,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6986

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2853

RON

Romanian leu

4,3423

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3690

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2332

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3129

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1013

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6008

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6478

KRW

South Korean won

1 471,31

ZAR

South African rand

10,3027

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2179

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5703

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 644,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0130

PHP

Philippine peso

56,344

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3340

THB

Thai baht

40,860

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2825

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0627

INR

Indian rupee

65,0780

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
No. 11019.

#### Cockrell *v.*The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Decided December 14, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Logan county.

*Mr. A. Jay Miller*and *Mr. M. R. Brown,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. West & West,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reasons stated by the circuit court in its judgment reversing the judgment of the court of common pleas, and also for the reason that the court of common pleas erred in sustaining the plaintiff’s objection to the following question: “What risk, or hazard, or cause, or source of injury incident to transferring that cab from that push car on the 19th of April, 1905, *532was there that was known to the defendant company, or its foreman, Mr. Fisher, or could have been known by either, that was not known to the plaintiff, or that was not equally well known or obvious to the plaintiff as to the defendant company or its foreman?”

Crew, C. J., Summers, Davis, Shaucic and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2012073EN.01000101.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/1

---

2012/C 73/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 65, 3.3.2012

OJ C 65, 3.3.2012

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 58, 25.2.2012

OJ C 49, 18.2.2012

OJ C 39, 11.2.2012

OJ C 32, 4.2.2012

OJ C 25, 28.1.2012

OJ C 13, 14.1.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CN.60 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3691
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010 Nine Additional States Match or Exceed 2000 Census Mail Participation Rates Twenty-eight states matched or exceeded 2000 response rate Nine additional states have met or exceeded their 2000 Census mail participation rates for the 2010 Census, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today, bringing the total number of states to 28 that reached that milestone. Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico both surpassed their 2000 rates as well. The states' achievement comes despite trends over the past decade toward declining survey participation, a more diverse population, a difficult economic environment and a growing distrust of government. The Census Bureau also announced today that the nation reached a response rate of just more than 72 percent, matching the rate it achieved in the 2000 Census. The rates for all states, counties, cities, towns and neighborhoods are on the Census Bureau's interactive mail participation rate map at <http://2010.census.gov/2010census/take10map/>. The nine new states to the list include: Kansas
  Idaho
  Maryland
  Michigan
  Mississippi
  Nevada
  Oregon
  Pennsylvania
  Texas They join the following states that met or exceeded their rates earlier: Alabama
  Delaware
  Florida
  Georgia
  Hawaii
  Illinois
  Indiana
  Kentucky
  Maine
  Minnesota
  New York
  North Carolina
  South Carolina
  Tennessee
  Utah
  Vermont
  Virginia
  Washington In addition, there are 11 states that came within one point of matching their 2000 Census rates. These include: Arizona
  Arkansas
  Connecticut
  Iowa
  Lousiana
  Massachusetts
  Missouri
  New Hampshire
  New Jersey
  Ohio
  Wisconsin ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are used to apportion congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to tribal, state and local governments each year and to make decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census form is one of the shortest in U.S. history, consisting of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict confidentiality laws protect the respondents and the information they provide.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy