alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Population
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.04 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JAN. 12, 2012 Island Areas: Supplemental Population Counts Population counts for lower levels of geography are now available for American Samoa, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Supplemental population counts were released last week for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands at the village level. The demographic profiles for the Island Areas are scheduled for release this summer, and the summary files are scheduled for release in the fall. The supplemental population counts and other information about the Island Areas can be found on the Island Areas press kit page, <http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/island-areas/island-areas.html>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clarence COLE.

No. 59903.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

Samuel M. Cashio, Cashio & Cashio, C. Alvin Tyler, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., John W. Sinquefield, Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanley J.
Gadek, Senior Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  | 
|------------------ |  |  | 
|September 18, 2003 |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |
# C_2013010EN.01000101.xml

| 15.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6752 — CVC/Cunningham Lindsey Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 10/01

On 3 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6752. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6752. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We
have issued our report dated November 3, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 588 contained in Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-266862) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report
in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/
Grant Thornton LLP


 


Chicago,
Illinois


November
3, 2022
#### Richard MEDLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-503.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          79511
<SECURITIES>                               43,016,243
<RECEIVABLES>                                 227,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           43,590,445
<PP&E>                                      1,224,092
<DEPRECIATION>                               (796,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             44,056,349
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                            8,752,515
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       53,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERED>                                 35,250,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               44,056,349
<SALES>                                       324,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,629,438
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 961,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,561,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            484,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (377,315)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   43,145
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (420,460)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (420,460)
<EPS-INCOME>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANTOS ESCOBAR-TORRES, a.k.a.

Santos Escobar,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-72841

Agency No. A089-859-595

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 1, 2013** 

Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Santos Escobar-Torres, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying withholding of removal and relief

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8

FILED

AUG 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-72841

U.S.C. § 1252. We review factual findings for substantial evidence, Zehatye v.

Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for

review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision that there is an absence of

changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse the untimely filing of

Petitioner’s asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(4)-(5).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s finding that there is no nexus

between Petitioner’s fear of future harm and a protected ground. See DelgadoOrtiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th Cir. 2010); Zetino v. Holder, 622

F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the denial of CAT relief, because

Petitioner failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured

if he returns to El Salvador. See Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir.

2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2035 

To provide funding to the National Institute of Mental Health to support 

suicide prevention and brain research, including funding for the Brain 

Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2014 

Mr. BEGICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide funding to the National Institute of Mental 

Health to support suicide prevention and brain research, 

including funding for the Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Suicide Prevention Re5 search INnovaTion Act’’ or the ‘‘SPRINT Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2035 IS

1 SEC. 2. SUICIDE PREVENTION AND BRAIN RESEARCH. 

2 Subpart 16 of part C of title IV of the Public Health 

3 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 285p et seq.) is amended by adding 

4 at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 464U–1. FUNDING FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION AND 

6 BRAIN RESEARCH. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The National Institute of Mental 

8 Health shall use the funds made available to such institute 

9 under subsection (b) exclusively for the purpose of con10 ducting and supporting— 

11 ‘‘(1) research on the determinants of self-di12 rected and other violence in mental illness, including 

13 studies designed to reduce the risk of self-harm, sui14 cide, and interpersonal violence, especially in rural 

15 communities with a shortage of mental health serv16 ices; and 

17 ‘‘(2) brain research through the Brain Research 

18 Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies 

19 (BRAIN) Initiative. 

20 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—In ad21 dition to amounts otherwise made available to the Na22 tional Institute of Mental Health, including amounts ap23 propriated under section 402A(a), there are authorized to 

24 be appropriated to such institute $40,000,000 for each of 

25 fiscal years 2015 through 2019 to carry out this section.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered July 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00325-CV

TEODORA RIVAS CARRION, Appellant

V.

GILBERTO CARRION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-18880-V

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated April 21, 2014, we notified 

the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue and directed the Dallas 

County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record within thirty days. To date, the clerk’s record has 

not been filed and we have not received any correspondence from the Dallas County District 

Clerk’s office regarding the status of the clerk’s record.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record 

within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 
Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
**Antidegradation and Variances discussion with ASIWPCA Wednesday, November 17, 2:00**  **– 3:30 pm**  **EPA Headquarters (conference call)**  **Attendees:**  EPA OW - OST - Grace Robiou, Shari Barash, Christina Christensen, Fred Leutner, Chelsea Morris, Heather Goss  States: [get full list from Sean (?)] **Topics covered:**  Regulatory

revision possibilities for antidegradation - possible effects on states, and state feedback  Regulatory

revision possibilities for variances - possible effects on states, and state feedback
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id:**

**Series title: Labor force status:**  **Type of data: Age:**  **Years:**

**Year Jan**  **Feb Mar**  **Apr May**  **Jun Jul**  **Aug Sep**  **Oct Nov**  **Dec 2001**  4181 4206 417542894304 4367 4426 4432 4339 4384 4332 4341 **2002** 43994296 4357 4361 4334 4396 4507 44554306 4356 4333 4341 **2003** 4431 44484344 4356 44194490 4611 4642 4590 45294433 4503 **2004** 4586 4497 4597 4691 4687 4817 4912 4800 4787 4767 4759 4789 **2005** 4961 4876 4858487848684925 5026 4960 4871 4924 49054959 **2006** 4969 503549994915 5063 5045 5044 5086 4973 4998 5124 5094 **2007** 5116 5122 4973 5156 5051 5159 5145 5253 5094 5110 5007 4897 **2008** 4892 4931 4900 5036 5073 5033 5047 5003 5034 4821 4912 4891 **2009** 4893 4931 4920 4993 4978 5123 5137 5285 5215 5133 5219 5161 **2010** 5067 5097 5016 5027 5099 5174 5249 5236 5173 5304 5208 5210 **2011** 5165 5217 5267 5345 5435 5471 5501 5467 5227 Not in labor force Number in thousands 55 to 59 years 2001 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value**

LNU05000094 **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 55-59 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:35 AM)Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Annual** 4315 4370 4483 4724 4918 5029 5090 4964 5082 5155

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:35 AM)
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2041 

To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2014 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘May 31, 1918 Act Re5 peal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) 1918 ACT.—The term ‘‘1918 Act’’ means 

9 the Act of May 31, 1918 (40 Stat. 592, chapter 88). 

10 (2) TRIBES.—The term ‘‘Tribes’’ means the 

11 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Indian 

12 Reservation. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2041 IS

1 SEC. 3. REPEAL. 

2 The 1918 Act is repealed. 

3 SEC. 4. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Tribes shall have the exclu5 sive right of first refusal to purchase at fair market value 

6 any land— 

7 (1) set aside or set apart under the 1918 Act; 

8 and 

9 (2) offered for sale. 

10 (b) ACQUIRED LAND HELD IN TRUST.—The United 

11 States shall hold in trust for the benefit of the Tribes or 

12 a member of the Tribes, as applicable— 

13 (1) any land acquired by the Tribes or a mem14 ber of the Tribes before the date of enactment of 

15 this Act; and 

16 (2) any land— 

17 (A) acquired by the Tribes or a member of 

18 the Tribes on or after the date of enactment of 

19 this Act; and 

20 (B) set aside or set apart under the 1918 

21 Act. 

22 SEC. 5. EFFECT. 

23 Nothing in this Act affects any valid right to any land 

24 set aside or set apart under the 1918 Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NORTHEAST UTILITIES SYSTEM                   Exhibit 21
                     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Northeast Utilities

        The Connecticut Light and Power Company (100%)
                -       CL&P Capital, L.P. (3%)
                -       Research Park, Inc. (100%)
                -       The City and Suburban Electric and Gas Company (100%)
                -       Electric Power Incorporated (100%)
                -       The Connecticut Transmission Corporation (100%)
                -       The Nutmeg Power Company (100%)
                -       The Connecticut Steam Company (100%)
                -       CL&P Receivables Corporation (100%)
                -       Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (34.5%)
                -       Yankee Atomic Electric Company (24.5%)
                -       Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (12%)
                -       Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (9.5%)

        Public Service Company of New Hampshire (100%)
                -       Properties, Inc. (100%)
                -       New Hampshire Electric Company (100%)
                -       Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (5%)
                -       Yankee Atomic Electric Company (7%)
                -       Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (5%)
                -       Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (4%)

        North Atlantic Energy Corporation (100%)

        North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation (100%)

        Western Massachusetts Electric Company (100%)
             -    WMECO Receivables Corporation (100%)
                -       Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (9.5%)
                -       Yankee Atomic Electric Company (7%)
                -       Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (3%)
                -       Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (2.5%)

        Holyoke Water Power Company (100%)
                -       Holyoke Power and Electric Company (100%)

        Charter Oak Energy, Inc. (100%)
                -       COE Development Corporation (100%)
                -       COE Argentina II Corp. (100%)
                -       COE Ave Fenix Corporation (100%)

        Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (100%)

        Northeast Utilities Service Company (100%)

        The Quinnehtuk Company (100%)

        The Rocky River Realty Company (100%)



        
        NU Enterprises, Inc. (100%)
                -       Northeast Generation Company (100%)
                -       Northeast Generation Services Company (100%)
                -       Mode 1 Communications, Inc.  (100%)
                -       Select Energy, Inc. (100%)
                -       HEC Inc. (100%)
                        -       HEC International Corporation (100%)
                        -       HEC Energy Consulting Canada, Inc. (100%)
                        -       Southwest HEC Energy Services L.L.C. (99%)
# C_2013168EN.01000101.xml

| 14.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6871 — Mohawk Industries/Spano Invest)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 168/01

On 23 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6871. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6871. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-25-2018]

On April 10, 2018, Textiles Coated International Inc., submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facilities within Site 4 of FTZ 81, in Manchester and Londonderry, New Hampshire.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 17790, April 24, 2018). On August 8, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14, and to a restriction that woven glass fiber mats and woven glass fiber fabrics (colored and not colored) be admitted to the zone in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41).                

Dated: August 8, 2018.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-17418 Filed 8-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P