alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
12/03/2015 03:45PM 8085221551 

FEDERAL AVIATION 

ADMINISTRATION 

CHRIS FERRARA LAW 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

I 

I 

Complainant, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FAA CASE NO. Z012WPU0065 

fDMS NO. FAA koB-1080 ~ 

v. ! 

SCHUMAN AVIATION COMPANY, LTD 

Respondent. 

__________________________ ) 

I 

I 

AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPL~ BRIH 

i 

PAGE 02/02 

PURSUANT to a telephone conference on November 30,2015, Counsel for ~he FAA, Enforcement 

Division, AGC-300, Casey E. Gardner and Respondent's Counsel have agree? to extend the time for filing 

a reply brief to January 15, 2016 to allow time for further negotiations. i 

i 

• I 

' WHEREFORE, the Respondent, respectfully requests that the FAA Declslonrraker approve said 

extension. r 

DATED: 

' 

~$&< .;; 2RJ ~ONOLULU, HAWAII 

~~ CHRISTOPHER D. FERRARA I 

Attorney for Respondent I · 

I 

j 
12/03/2015 03:42PM 8085221551 CHRIS FERRARA LAW 

CHRISTOPHER D. FERRARA 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

FACSIMILE COVER SHEET 

DATE: December 3,2015 

TO: Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-430 I 

FROM: Christopher D. Ferrara \ 

RE: Schuman Aviation, FAA #2012WP30065, OMS #FAA-2013-0~80 MEMO: Enclosed Agreement to Extend Time to File Reply Brief 

PAGES SENT: 2 

3555 HARDING AVENUI'<, STE. 2F • HoNOI.l!LU, HAWAIJ g6816 

0FPICE; (8o8) 522-1660 • FACSIMIL>:: (808) 52.2~1661 • 0-JRIS@fERRARAlAWHAWAII.COM 

PAGE 01/02
# C_2012195EN.01000302.xml

| 3.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6617 — Trafigura/Baycliffe/Blue Ocean)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 195/06

On 25 June 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6617. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6617. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## County Business Patterns

The Newsroom site has been redesigned and relocated.  This is the archive area.

For the most current releases please visit the redesigned newsroom at:https://www.census.gov/newsroom.html

For previous press releases please contact the Public Information Office at 301-763-3030.

### 2012

                          - June 26:   U.S. Employer Businesses Show Declines in Establishments and Employees in 2010, Census Bureau Reports

### 2011

                          - June 30:   La Oficina del Censo informa una reducción en la cantidad de establecimientos y empleados de empresas estadounidenses
                          - June 30:   Census Bureau Reports U.S. Employer Firms Show Declines in Number of Establishments and Employees
                          - June 30:   County Business Patterns News Conference Thursday, June 30, 2011
                          - June 23:   Media Advisory — Census Bureau Webinar to Release County Business Statistics 

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### CONTINENTAL ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. Janies M. ALBERT, Appellee.

No. 68-85.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 10, 1968.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 8, 1968.

Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, Edward A. Perse and Jesse W. Miller, Miami, for appellant.

Dean, Adams, George & Wood and Don R. Livingstone, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

This appeal is from a final judgment rendered after the trial court directed a verdict for the appellee, James M. Albert.

The appellant claims that error was committed by the trial court in directing a verdict for the plaintiff at the close of all the evidence. We have reviewed the record on appeal and do not find that reversible error was committed in this regard. See New York Life Ins. Co. v. Bird, 152 Fla. 532, 12 So.2d 454 (1943) ; New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Huckins, 127 Fla. 540, 173 So. 696 (1937); Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. McKeithan, 119 Fla. 486, 160 So. 883 (1935) ; Equitable Life Assurance Society of U. S. v. Neill, 243 F.2d 193 (5th Cir. 1957); and Blaustein v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co., 207 F.Supp. 223 (D.D.C.1962).

Appellant’s last two points are directed toward the alleged error of the trial court in awarding attorney’s fees under the authority of Fla.Stat. § 627.0127, F.S.A. The order fixing the amount of attorney’s fees reflects that it was based on the sworn testimony of two local attorneys who were *81members of the Dade County Bar Association. No record of their testimony or of any evidence submitted at the hearing on attorney’s fees has been presented to this court. We are, therefore, unable to say that the trial court committed reversible error in this regard. See Wilder v. Altman, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 250; Pence v. Ennis, Fla.App. 1964, 163 So.2d 330; and Pan American Metal Products, Inc. v. Healy, Fla.App. 1962, 138 So.2d 96. The final judgment herein appealed be and the same is hereby

Affirmed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LS POWER FUNDING CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 332,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        332,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           1
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   332,001
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,943
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00385-CV

Ronald Harden

v.

Shan Merriman

§

§

§

§

From the 362nd District Court

of Denton County (2011-41013-362)

October 31, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in some of the trial court’s order. The order is modified to delete 

the sanctions award to Shan Merriman. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed as modified.

It is further ordered that appellant Ronald Harden shall pay all of the costs 

of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Theundersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,2006 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| *  **December 7, 2006* | * *   | *By:*                     | * s/ Peter M. Folger* | * * |
|----------------------------------|------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|----------|
| Date                             |       | Peter M. Folger           |
| ** **                       | ** ** | Senior Vice President and |
|                             |       | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shallit be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

----
#### Peter Frank TIARKS, Appellant, v. I. B. H. LIQUOR CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-475.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 10, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Richard A. Wisot, the chief
financial officer of PROLIANCE INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the "issuer"), does hereby
certify that the report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the
"report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Richard A. Wisot
-------------------------------------------
Richard A. Wisot
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)
PROLIANCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
November 14, 2006

                                       35
```
,^•L.^•^^• |

0 1 Octobe r201 0 Ms . Aloh a Ley Associat e Directo r Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Departmen t o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysis , X86-31 0 120 0 Ne wJerse yAveriu e S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re . DOT-OST-2010-012 4 Ms . Ley : Allegian t Ai ri s a low-cos t ai rcarrie rofferin g non-sto p flight s fro m approximatel y6 5 smal l communitie s throughou t th e Unite d State s t o majo rleisur e destination s (ike : La s Vega s (LAS) , Phoeni x(AZA) , Orland o (MC O & SFB) , Tamp a (PIE) , For t Lauderdal e (FLL) , an d Lo s Angele s (LAX & LGB) . W e constantl yevaluat e ne waddition s t o ou rnetwork , bot h smalle rcommunit yan d destinatio n airports . W e hav e bee n evaluatin g th e Northeas t Florid a Regiona l Airport (SGJ ) a t St . Augustin e fo rsom e time . Th e Airport an d surroundin g regio n appea rt o hav e potentia l a s a ne wAllegian t Ai rdestinatio n city . Th e Airport ha s recentl ymad e a n applicatio n fo ra Smal l CommunityAi rServic e Developmen t Grant . Th e Airport' s applicatio n i s fo rmarketin g an d promotiona l funding . Th e abilit yo f a n Airport an d communit yt o provid e marketin g an d promotiona l fundin g i s a n importan t facto r i n Allegiant' s consideratio n o f ne wmarke t opportunities . Allegian t Ai rurge s th e Departmen t t o giv e favorabl e consideratio n t o th e Airport' s gran t application . Sincerely , Bria n Davi s Directo ro f Airport Plannin g & Charter s

ejO O S Dui.intj o Dli, B L.1- , /eq.i'. , Novjd j d'.' l 1 1 p 70 2 8^. 1 710 0 t 70 1 HS 1 7301 Trave l i s ou rdeal .
Exhibit 10.41.2
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 23, 1999, amends 
Section 6.1(f) of the Employment Agreement, dated as of August 21, 1996, 
between Northeast Utilities Service Company and Bruce D. Kenyon, to read as 
follows:


(f)  "Termination upon a Change of Control" shall mean a Termination of 
Employment during the period beginning on the earlier of (a) approval by the 
shareholders of NU of a Change of Control or (b) consummation of a Change of 
Control and, in either case, ending on the second anniversary of the 
consummation of the transaction that constitutes the Change of Control (or if 
such period started on shareholder approval and after such shareholder 
approval the Board abandons the transaction, on the date the Board abandoned 
the transaction) either:

(i)  initiated by the Company for any reason other than Executive's (w) 
disability, as described in Section 5.1 hereof, (x) death, (y) retirement on 
or after attaining age 65, or (z) "cause," as defined in Section 5.3 hereof, 
or 

(ii) initiated by Executive (A) upon any failure of the Company materially to 
comply with and satisfy any of the terms of this Agreement, including any 
significant reduction by the Company of the authority, duties or 
responsibilities of Executive, any reduction of Executive's compensation or 
benefits due hereunder, or the assignment to Executive of duties which are 
materially inconsistent with the duties of Executive's position as defined in 
Section 1.2 above, or (B) if Executive is transferred, without Executive's 
written consent, to a location that is more than 50 miles from Executive's 
principal place of business immediately preceding such approval or 
consummation; provided, that the imposition on Executive following a Change 
of Control of a limitation of Executive's scope of authority such that 
Executive's responsibilities relate primarily to a company or companies whose 
common equity is not publicly held shall be considered a "significant 
reduction by the Company of the authority, duties or responsibilities of 
Executive" for purposes hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, intending to be legally bound, have 
executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


		NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY
/s/Bruce D. Kenyon
3/5/99
							By /s/Cheryl Grise
							Senior Vice President, Secretary
							and General Counsel
							3/4/99
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Parking Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Emanuel Eads, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ EMANUEL EADS
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Emanuel Eads
                                           Chief Executive Officer

      A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS
BEEN PROVIDED TO CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CENTRAL
PARKING CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR
ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing. This certification is executed as of May 10, 2006.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, James G. Gidwitz, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-K of Continental Materials Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 13, 2005
|   |  By: | /s/  James G. Gidwitz      |   |
|--------|-----------|----------------------------|--------|
|   |      | James  G. Gidwitz          |
|   |      | Chairman  of the Board and |
|   |      | Chief  Executive Officer   |

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis SMITH, Jr. and James Campbell.

No. 60793.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs.

Application not considered. Not timely mailed on October 7th.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Business Ownership
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.29 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 2012 2012 Capital Spending Report: U.S. Capital Spending Patterns: 2001-2010 This report provides a historical look at the capital spending patterns for structures and equipment by U.S. businesses with and without employees at the national level and for businesses with employees at the industry sector level. Data for this report come from the Annual Capital Expenditures Survey. Internet address is: <www.census.gov/econ/aces/report/2012/csr.html>. **No news release associated with this report.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
262 La. 1100

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Giles O. STANTON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52673.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1972.

In re: Giles O. Stanton applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, certio-rari and/or prohibition.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction. See relator’s affidavit.
259 La. 997

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Howard ROBERTS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51889.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1971.

In re: Howard Roberts applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.