alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6419

DAVID MICHAEL BOMBER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Elizabeth Kay Dillon , District Judge. ( 7:16

- cv - 00171

- EKD

- RSB )

Submitted : July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. David Michael Bomber, Appellant Pro Se. Victoria Lee Johnson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are n ot binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Michael Bomber seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate o f appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the mer its, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 53 7 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutiona l right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bomber has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Bomber’s motion for a certificate of appealability , deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.12


 








Loan Agreement 


 





 


Lender Toshio Ohshimo (The ”Lender”)
and Borrower Link Bit Consulting Co.,Ltd.


(“The “Borrower”)
entered into loan agreement with the following conditions as of today.


 





 


Article 1. (Loan Agreement)


 


The Lender agreed to advance the
sum of JPY100,000,000 (the “Loan”) by way of loan to the Borrower by money transfer to the bank account specified by
the Borrower and the Borrower received the amount today.


 





The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ
Ltd. 


Kojimachi Branch


Saving A/C (Futsu Yokin) 4524647


Link Bit Consulting Co,Ltd.


 





Article 2. (Interest)


 


The Loan shall bear interest at the
rate of 15% per annum.





 


 




    	 	1	 



     


    

 





 


Article 3. (Repayment of Loan)


 


The interest shall be repayable by
every 15th of month to the Lender by hand or money transfer to the bank account stated below by the Borrower.


The principal amount of the Loan
shall be repayable to the Lender by hand or money transfer to the bank account stated below by December 15th, 2016 by
the Borrower.


 





 


Article 4. (Forfeiture of Benefit
of Time)


 


The occurrence of any of the following
events by the Borrower shall forfeit the benefit of time without any notice from the Lender and the Borrower shall repay the principal
amount together with accrued interest immediately.


1) If the Borrower is filed for provisional
attachment, or filed for attachment, provisional disposition, auction, compulsory execution, disposition of failure to pay taxes
against property that belongs to the Borrower.


2) If the Borrower is filed for bankruptcy,
civil rehabilitation, reorganization, or special liquidation proceedings, or by other liabilities


3) If
the notes or cheques drawn, endorsed or secured by the borrower became dishonored


4) If the Borrower changes his address
without any notification to the Lender.


 


 





 


 


 




    	 	2	 



     


    

Article 5. (Delinquency Charges)


If the Borrower failed to repay by
the term stated in article 3 or forfeit the benefit of time, the Borrower shall pay the delinquency charge of 21.9% per annum to
the principal balance until paid off.


 





Article 6.


Mr. Shuya Watanabe shall pay the
loan to the Lender jointly and severally with the Borrower.


 


 





Each party hereto has executed
this Loan Agreement with their seals, and the Lender shall retain the original and the Borrower and Mr.Watanabe to retain one copy
each.
No. 11536.

#### The Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railway Co. *v.*Smith.

Decided February 15, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Clark county.

*Messrs. Keifer & Keifer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Stafford & Arthur,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Spear, Davis and Price,. JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2965 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2965

 To revive and extend until January 1, 1997, the suspension of duty on 
                     castor oil and its fractions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 1993

   Mr. Levy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revive and extend until January 1, 1997, the suspension of duty on 
                     castor oil and its fractions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CASTOR OIL AND ITS FRACTIONS.

    Heading 9902.15.15 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/96''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 applies with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Application to Certain Entries.--Notwithstanding 
section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other 
provision of law, upon a request filed with the appropriate customs 
officer before the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, 
of goods described in heading 9902.15.15 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992, and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
occurred on the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 16

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549


Commissioners:

We have read the attached statements made by Teltech Resource Network
Corporation, which we understand will be filed with the Commission, pursuant to
Sopheon plc's Form F-4 dated on or around August 22, 2000. We agree with the
statements concerning our Firm.

Very truly yours,




\s\ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
     Minneapolis, Minnesota
     August 21, 2000

<PAGE>

                              Attachment to Letter

                             CHANGES IN ACCOUNTANTS

         PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP ("PwC") performed and issued audit reports
for Teltech for the fiscal years 1994 through 1997. In August 1999, PwC chose to
resign to enable PricewaterhouseCoopers Securities, LLC to take an expanded role
as the Company's financial advisor. Also in August 1999, Teltech's board of
directors and audit committee decided to retain KPMG LLP as its independent
public accountants. There were no disagreements with the former auditors on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or
auditing scope of procedure at the time of the change with respect to Teltech's
financial statements for fiscal year 1997, which, if not resolved to the former
auditors' satisfaction, would have caused them to make reference to the subject
matter of the disagreement in connection with their report. Prior to retaining
KPMG LLP, Teltech had not consulted with KPMG LLP regarding accounting
principles.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 05, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 05, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0050. JOHNNY EDWARD SMITH v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 1988CR08395
# C_2013201EN.01000101.xml

| 13.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6917 — FSI/Merit/Yildirim/CMA CGM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 201/01

On 25 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6917. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6917. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### LAFAYETTE LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. STANLEY.

No. 39256.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 229 So.2d 19.
# C_2012239EN.01000101.xml

| 9.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 August 2012

2012/C 239/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2336 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 96,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4438 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78880 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,2770 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2012 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3040 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,173 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0905 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5499 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2094 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,1704 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2309 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5679 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5177 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5375 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 396,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1532 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8473 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4970 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 685,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8272 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,507 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,2460 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,883 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5103 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3722 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,3600 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2336

JPY

Japanese yen

96,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4438

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78880

SEK

Swedish krona

8,2770

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2012

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3040

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,173

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0905

RON

Romanian leu

4,5499

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2094

AUD

Australian dollar

1,1704

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2309

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5679

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5177

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5375

KRW

South Korean won

1 396,30

ZAR

South African rand

10,1532

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8473

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4970

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 685,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8272

PHP

Philippine peso

51,507

RUB

Russian rouble

39,2460

THB

Thai baht

38,883

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5103

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3722

INR

Indian rupee

68,3600

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ

- SANTOS,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 30187

D.C. No. 1:18

- cr

- 02042

- SMJ

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 8, 2020 * *

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Rodriguez

- Santos appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his jury

- trial conviction and 144

- month sentence for possession with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U. S.C. § 841(a)(1),
(b)(1)(B)(viii), and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 16 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 30187

crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)

. Pursuant to Anders v. California
, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez

- Santos ’ s counsel has filed a brief statin g that there
are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
Rodriguez

- Santos has filed a p ro se supplemental brief . No answering brief has

been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Contrary to Rodriguez

- Santos’s argument in his pro se brief, counsel’s brief
comports with the requirements of Ander s

. See Anders
, 386 U.S. at 744

.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
We conclude that the documentation before us demonstrates 

that Shoen poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public, and 

that her immediate temporary suspension is warranted under SCR 

102(4)(a). Accordingly, we hereby order attorney Lynn R. Shoen 

temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the resolution of 

formal disciplinary proceedings against her. 

We further conclude that Shoen's handling of funds 

should be restricted. Accordingly, pursuant to SCR 102(4)(a), (b), and (c), 

we impose upon Shoen the following conditions: 

1. Shoen is precluded from accepting new cases and is 

precluded from continuing to represent existing clients, effective 

immediately upon service of this order; 

2. All proceeds from Shoen's practice of law and all fees and 

other funds received from or on behalf of her clients shall, from the date of 

service of this order, be deposited into a trust account from which no 

withdrawals may be made by Shoen except upon written approval of bar 

counsel; and 

3. Shoen is prohibited from withdrawing any funds from any 

and all accounts in any way relating to her law practice, including but not 

limited to her general and trust accounts, except upon written approval of 

bar counsel. 

The state bar shall immediately serve Shoen with a copy of 

this order. Such service may be accomplished by personal service, 

certified mail, delivery to a person of suitable age at Shoen's place of 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e 2 
Pee4 

Pickering 

, J. 

Hardesty 

Gibbons 

C.J. 

Parraguirre Douglas 

• 

employment or residence, or by publication. 2Shoen shall comply with the 

provisions of SCR 115. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Cherry 

cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel 

Jeffrey A. Albregts, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Lynn R. Shoen 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

2When served on either Shoen or a depository in which she 

maintains an account, this order shall constitute an injunction against 

withdrawal of the proceeds except in accordance with the terms of this 

order. See SCR 102(4)(b). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 04p40 

3
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, David A. Husband, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vodavi Technology, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize, and report financial information ; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 1, 2006           /s/ David A. Husband David A. Husband
#### Lonnie RUMPH, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43782.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 8, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 559.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.05 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, JANUARY 28, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau to Release Local 2010 Census Data for Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey and Virginia According to Public Law (P.L.) 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  http://factfinder2.census.gov For more information on the Census Bureau's Redistricting Data Program, visit https://www.census.gov/rdo.
  http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html Twitter Facebook Flickr YouTube
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy