alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012134EN.01000301.xml

| 8.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6501 — Scholz Austria/Asamer Familienholding/RPE Recyclingpark Eisenerz)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 134/05

On 2 May 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6501. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6501. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.12 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2012 Census Bureau Launches Interactive 1940 Census Web Page In anticipation of the April 2 release of 1940 Census records from the National Archives, the U.S. Census Bureau is launching a new page on its website. Strict confidentiality laws ensure that census records are only unsealed after 72 years have passed, so genealogists, historians and researchers have waited with great eagerness for this release. The site features an interactive overview of the 1940 Census, including questions asked on the census form, history facts, blogs, a 1940 Census video, pictures and a countdown clock. From the site, users will also find a direct link to the National Archives website for looking up individual 1940 Census records. In addition, there is a newly released infographic providing a rich visual depiction of how characteristics of the U.S. population have changed between 1940 and 2010. This is the first in a series of three infographics that will explore topics related to the 1940 Census. For more information, visit https://www.census.gov/1940census. This site will be updated regularly with new interactive features in the days leading up to April 2. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Order filed, March 26, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00118-CR

____________

AHMAD PEYRAVI, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 919251

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 11, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Pam Knobloch, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
# C_2012283EN.01000201.xml

| 19.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6644 — APG/PGGM/Challenger LBC Terminals)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 283/03

On 31 August 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6644. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6644. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Greg Harper

### Demographer, Local Government Estimates and Migration Processing BranchPopulation Division, U.S. Census Bureau

Greg began his career at the Census Bureau in 1989 working on the Consumer Expenditure Survey in the Demographic Surveys Division. Greg has spent the past 19 years in the Population Division producing, reviewing, and disseminating state, county and subcounty population estimates. Greg serves as a media contact for the state, county, and subcounty population estimates.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40033-40034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17350]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-2144-000]


Big Sky North, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
Big Sky North, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is August 27, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's

[[Page 40034]]

Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the website that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#feb8bbacbdb1909297909bad8b8e8e918c8abe989b8c9dd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="23656671606c4d4f4a4d46705653534c515763454651400d444c55">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 7, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17350 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered July 3, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00134-CR

HAMID SHOHREH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-82213-2013

ORDER

Appellant’s June 27, 2014 motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is before 

the Court. In his motion, appellant requests that the time to file his brief be extended until after 

the court of criminal appeals issues an opinion on an unrelated case that addresses a similar 

issue. The Court will not grant an indefinite extension that tethers this case to the resolution of 

the matter pending in the court of criminal appeals.

Accordingly, appellant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART. The time to file appellant’s 

brief is EXTENDED to FORTY-FIVE DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Larry L. Enterline, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Venturi Partners,
Inc. (the registrant);

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

|                        |  |                       
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Date: November 10, 2003 |  | /s/ Larry L. Enterline
|                        |  |                       
|                        |  | Larry L. Enterline    

33
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Greenland Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated February 18, 2000,
appearing in the Annual Report Form 10-K of Greenland Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1999.






/s/ LEVITZ, ZACKS & CICERIC
-------------------------------------------
LEVITZ, ZACKS & CICERIC
San Diego, California


September 11, 2000
#### Leonce HERNANDEZ v. COMCO INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 62456.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Leonce Hernandez, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of St. Bernard. 357 So.2d 1368.

Writ denied.

TATE, CALOGERO and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 21   Subsidiaries of Springleaf Finance Corporation   As of March 30, 2011Jurisdiction of
IncorporationSpringleaf Finance Management CorporationIndianaSpringleaf Financial Services of Alabama, Inc.DelawareSpringleaf Financial Services of Arizona, Inc.ArizonaSpringleaf Financial Services of Arkansas , Inc.DelawareSpringleaf Financial Services of New Hampshire, Inc.DelawareSpringleaf Financial Funding CompanyDelawareSpringleaf Financial Cash Services, Inc.DelawareSpringleaf Financial Services, Inc.DelawareSpringleaf Documentation Services, Inc.CaliforniaSpringleaf Financial Services of America, Inc.DelawareSpringleaf Home Equity, Inc.DelawareSpringleaf Auto Finance, Inc.DelawareSpringleaf Financial Services of Florida, Inc.FloridaSpringleaf Financial Services of Hawaii, Inc.HawaiiSpringleaf Financial Services of Illinois, Inc.IllinoisService Bureau of Indiana, Inc.IndianaSpringleaf Financial Technology, Inc.IndianaSpringleaf Financial Services of Indiana, Inc.IndianaSpringleaf Commercial Corp.IndianaInterstate Agency, Inc.IndianaSpringleaf Financial Services of America, Inc.IowaSpringleaf Financial Services of Louisiana, Inc.LouisianaSpringleaf Financial Services of Massachusetts, Inc.MassachusettsSpringleaf Finance, Inc.NevadaMorEquity, Inc.NevadaWilmington Finance, Inc.DelawareThird Street Funding LLCDelawareSixth Street Funding, LLCDelawareSpringleaf Financial Services of New York, Inc.New YorkSpringleaf Financial Services of America, Inc.North CarolinaSpringleaf Financial Services of North Carolina, Inc.North CarolinaSpringleaf Financial Services of Ohio, Inc.OhioSpringleaf Financial Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.PennsylvaniaSpringleaf Financial Services of South Carolina, Inc.South CarolinaSpringleaf Auto Finance, Inc.TennesseeCrossroads Mortgage, Inc.TennesseeENM, Inc.TennesseeState Financial Services - Springleaf, Inc.TexasSpringleaf Finance of Utah, Inc.UtahSpringleaf Funding, Inc.DelawareSpringleaf Financial Services of Washington, Inc.WashingtonSpringleaf Home Equity, Inc.West VirginiaSpringleaf Financial Services of Wisconsin, Inc.WisconsinSpringleaf Financial Services of Wyoming, Inc.WyomingYosemite Insurance CompanyIndianaCommoLoCo, Inc.Puerto RicoCREDITHRIFT of Puerto Rico, Inc.Puerto RicoMerit Life Insurance Co.IndianaOcean Finance and Mortgages LimitedEngland and WalesOcean Money (II) LimitedEngland and WalesOcean Money LimitedEngland and Wales   244
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (161)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,742
<PP&E>                                         103,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                (29,303)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,719
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,798
<COMMON>                                        19,032
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,729
<SALES>                                         37,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,418
<CGS>                                           19,017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,266)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,055)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,055)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 20
- 00506
- CV

C. V., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 19
- 1044, THE HONORABLE DAVID JUNKIN, JUDGE PRES I DING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

C.V

. (Mother) appeals from the trial court ’ s order terminating her parental rights
to her child ren , H.E.N. Jr., J.V., and F.V.N

. 1 See Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001. Following a de novo hearing , the trial court fo und by clear and convincing evidence that statutory grounds for terminating her pare ntal rights existed and that termination was in the child ren ’ s best interest.
See id. § 161.001(b)(1)( D ), (E) , (O), (2).

On appeal, Mother ’ s court

- appointed attorney h a s filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. Ca lifornia , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Taylor v. Texas Dep ’ t of Protective & Regulatory Servs ., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646

– 47 (Tex. App.

—

1 We refer to appellant by her initials or as Mother and to the children by their initials

. See Tex. Fam. Code § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. P. 9.8. In this Court ’ s cause number 03

- 20

- 00 507

- CV, Mother ap p e als from the trial court ’ s order in suit affecting the parent

- chi ld relationship concerning her child C.G

.2

Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying A n ders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rig hts). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See 386
U.S. at 74 4 ; Taylor , 160 S.W.3d at 646

– 47. Mother ’ s counsel has cert ified to this Court that s he provided Mother with a copy of the Anders brief and informed her of her right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. To date, Mother has not filed a pro se brief.

Upon receiving an Anders brief, we must conduct a full examination of the proceedings to determine whethe r the appeal is wholly frivolous. Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75,
80 (1988). We have reviewed the entire record, including the Ande r s brief submitted on
Mother ’ s behalf, and have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. Our review
included the trial court ’ s endangerment findings, see Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001(b)(1)(D), (E),
and we have found no issues that could be raised o n appeal with respect to those findings, see In
re N.G. , 577 S.W.3d 230, 237 (Tex. 2019). We agree that the appeal is frivol ous and without
merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court ’ s order terminating Mother ’ s parental rights. 2

___________________ _______________________ Melissa Goodwin , Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Kelly
Affirmed
Filed: March 4, 202 1

2 We deny counsel ’ s mo tion to withdraw as attorney of record. See In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam). If Mother , after consul t i ng with counsel, desires to file a petition for review, counsel should timely file with the Texas Supreme Court “ a petition for review that satisfies the standards for an Ande rs brief. ” See id. at 27

– 28.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 7/29/15

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with Jamaica National Environment and Planning 

Agency

SUMMARY: 

Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to the Jamaica National Environment and 

Planning Agency in Atlanta, GA, on December 1, 2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Ken Mitchell/EPA R4

Al Korgi/EPA R4

External Stakeholders

Jody Ann Marston, Jamaica National Environment and Planning Agency

Steven Panton, Jamaica National Environment and Planning Agency

ATTACHMENT