alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases News Conferences
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				News Releases
 				**Press Kits**
 				Tip Sheets
 Webinar: Population Estimates **January 19, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. EST** **Event Materials** Presentation:Slides [PDF]

Archived webinar [WMV] Media Advisory: Census Bureau Technical Webinar to Highlight Upcoming Population Estimates Releases
News Release: Census Bureau Announces Dates for Upcoming Population Estimates Releases Speaker Biographies: 
   - Greg Harper, Demographer, Local Government Estimates and Migration Processing Branch, 
   Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau Background Materials Population Estimates Methodology
Blog
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix D: Cost Effectiveness Analysis December 1 5, 2011

Final Staff Report with Appendices for

Revised Proposed Amendments to Rule 4682 D - 1 

## APPENDIX D

Cost Effectiveness Analysis for

Permanent Total Enclosure/Regenerative Thermal Oxid izer System

in a Cup Molding Facility

December 15, 2011SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix D: Cost Effectiveness Analysis December 1 5, 2011

Final Staff Report with Appendices for

Revised Pro posed Amendments to Rule 4682 D - 2 This page intentionally blank.SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICTAppendix D: Cost Effectiveness AnalysisDecember 15, 2011Final Staff Report with Appendices forRevised Proposed Amendments to Rule 4682D - 3Determination of Capital & Operating Cost (using EPA OAQPSGuidelines)Production Area Emissions w/ PTE w/o AC; 120,000 cfm23.3 TPYCAPITAL COSTDirect CostCost Direct Operating Cost of RTOCostPurchased Equipment - Total A = 1.00 $1,250,000 Operating LaborCapture equipment cost (building mods & ducts) $250,000 rate ($/hr) 15Control equipment cost- RTO from EPA's tech sheet $1,000,000 hrs/day = 4TaxesA*.04 $50,000 days/wk = 7 $21,000Freight A*.05 $62,500 SupervisionSubtotal B= 1.18 $1,362,500 15 % of operating labor $3,150MaintenanceDirect Installationlabor; $15/hr * 4 hr/day * 360 day/yr $21,600Foundations & Supports B*.08 $109,000 materials = 5 % cap$50,000Erection & Installation B*.14 $190,750 UtilitiesElectrical Wiring B*.04 $54,500 electric &gas from budget quote$801,014Subtotal$354,250 Subtotal$896,764Indirect CostIndirect Operating Cost (fixed)CostEngineering & Supervision B*.10 $136,250 Overhead (60% of operating, supervision, and maintenance) $57,450Construction Fees B*.10 $136,250 Property tax (1 % oftotal capital investment (TCI) )$20,710StartupB*.02 $27,250 Insurance (1 % of TCI)$20,710Performance Testing B*.01 $13,625 Administration (2 %of TCI)$41,420Contingencies B*.03 $40,875 Capital recovery (CapitalRecovery Factor * TCI)$337,573Subtotal$354,250 Subtotal$477,863TOTAL CAPITAL COST = $2,071,000 TOTAL ANNUALIZED COST =$1,374,627cost /ton = $58,997SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT

Appendix D: Cost Effectiveness Analysis December 1 5, 2011

Final Staff Report with Appendices for

Revised Proposed Amendments to Rule 4682 D - 4 This page intentionally blank.
#### DISTRICT RED CROSS SHOE STORES, INC., Appellants, v. SHOE VILLA, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellee.

No. 72-547.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 26, 1973.

Jack F. Weins, of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick & Schneider, Hollywood, and Goldner, Marger, Davis & Richtmyer, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Jerald C. Cantor of Meyer, Leben, Pixel & Gaines, Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Abner’s Beef House Corp. v. Abner’s Internat’l, Inc., Fla.1969, 227 So.2d 865; Junior Food Stores of W. Fla. v. Jr. Food Stores, Inc., Fla.1969, 226 So.2d 393; Tampa Wholesale Co. v. Foodtown, U.S.A., Inc., Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 711; Jet Air Freight v. Jet Air Freight Delivery, Inc., Fla.App.1972, 264 So.2d 35; Florida Statutes § 495.151, F.S.A.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
# C_2011261EN.01000501.xml

| 3.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 September 2011

2011/C 261/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4255 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4496 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1237 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1132 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6765 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,304 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,43 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1821 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2405 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4860 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3328 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3944 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1012 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6737 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7157 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 513,08 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9699 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0977 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4860 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 161,81 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2300 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,082 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,4500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,651 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3170 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5878 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,2700 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4255

JPY

Japanese yen

109,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4496

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87890

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1237

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1132

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6765

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,304

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,43

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1821

RON

Romanian leu

4,2405

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4860

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3328

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3944

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1012

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6737

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7157

KRW

South Korean won

1 513,08

ZAR

South African rand

9,9699

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0977

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4860

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 161,81

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2300

PHP

Philippine peso

60,082

RUB

Russian rouble

41,4500

THB

Thai baht

42,651

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3170

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5878

INR

Indian rupee

65,2700

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
256 La. 885

#### Mrs. Hilda VIZENA et al. and Jeanette V. Soileau et al. v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 50873.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1970.

In re: Hilda Vizena et al. and Jeanette V. Soileau et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline. 238 So.2d 238; 238 So.2d 242.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 1675

THOMAS F. SWEENEY, Plaintiff

- Appellant.

v. PETE BUTTIGIEG, Secretary of the Department of Transportation, In his official capacity only, Defendant

- Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00204

- CMH

- JFA )

Submitted : October 21, 2022 Decided: November 16, 2022

Before DIAZ, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Thomas F. Sweeney , Appellant Pro Se. Peter B. Baumhart , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1675 Doc: 17 Filed: 11/16/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Thomas F. Sweeney appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss Sweeney’s employment discrimination complaint. Defendant has moved to dism iss the appeal , arguing that Sweeney did not timely file his notice of appeal. Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A), a district court order is entered when the “judgment or order is entered in the civil docket under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 79(a).” Se e Hughes v. Halifax Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 823 F.2d 832, 835 (4th Cir. 1987). Here, the district court entered its memorandum opinion and order in the docket on April 19, 2022. As a result, Sweeney had until June 21, 2022, to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B) ; Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1)(C), (6)(B). We therefore conclude that Sweeney’s notice of appeal , filed on June 21, was t imely, and we deny Defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Nonetheless, we have reviewed the record and find no r eversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweeney v. Buttigieg , No. 1:21

- cv - 00204

- CMH

- JFA (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 18, 2022 & entered Apr. 19, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1675 Doc: 17 Filed: 11/16/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2013113EN.01000101.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6743 — Talanx International/Meiji Yasuda Life Insurance Company/HDI Poland)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 113/01

On 22 November 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6743. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6743. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit32.2**

 

# **CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

# **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

# **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PacificNorthwest Bancorp (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filedon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bette J. Floray, Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Dated:                                                | August 12, 2003 |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------|
|   |
|   |
|   | /s/ Bette J.  Floray                                  |            |
|   | Bette J. Floray                                       |
|   | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                                                       |                 |        |  |  |

 

1

----
#### Donald L. TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-524.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 30, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1973.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Bruce J. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Thomas M. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Ordered that appellee’s Motion to Dismiss appeal filed October 12, 1973 is hereby granted, and the above-styled case commenced by the filing of a Notice of Appeal on April 26, 1973 in the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida, in Case No. 71-950, is hereby dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

UPON PETITION FOR REHEARING

We dismissed appellant’s Rule 3.-850, 33 F.S.A. appeal on October 30, 1973, and appellant has filed the instant petition for rehearing, wherein he complains about having been more severely sentenced after a new trial contrary to the pronouncements found in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U. S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656. These self-same matters were raised by this same appellant in a Rule 3.850, 33 F. S.A. petition which was denied in the trial court on July 17, 1972. This denial was appealed to this court in 268 So.2d 205 and we dismissed same at appellant’s behest on October 6, 1972. Furthermore, it is our view that the point, had it been brought on for consideration, was likely without merit as North Carolina v. Pearce, supra, is not *608to be applied retroactively, Michigan v. Payne, 1973, 412 U.S. 47, 93 S.Ct. 1966, 36 L.Ed.2d 736. Successive Rule 3.850, 33 F. S.A. petitions and appeals concerning the same facts and legal grievances or points cannot be considered. Fields v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 226.

The petition for rehearing is denied.
# C_2012261EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6657 — Marubeni Corporation/Gavilon Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 261/01

On 24 August 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6657. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6657. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,597
<SECURITIES>                                    57,338
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (922)
<INVENTORY>                                     34,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,264
<PP&E>                                          86,821
<DEPRECIATION>                                (42,079)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,862
<SALES>                                        225,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,600
<CGS>                                           80,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,716
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 28, 2014

h0324

Order 

Clerk

March 28, 2014

148025

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148025

COA: 316268

Wayne CC: 09-010479-FC

MEECHEE DEMONT MORRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Certification Requirements for Distributors of NOAA 
Electronic Navigational Charts/NOAA Hydrographic Products.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0508.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved 
information collection).
    Number of Respondents: 8.
    Average Hours per Response: 1 hour to provide a distribution report 
twice a year, 12 hours for reporting of errors in the ENC 
(approximately 4 per month, usually each distributor will catch the 
same issue).
    Burden Hours: 88.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for extension of a currently 
approved information collection.
    NOS Office of Coast Survey manages the Certification Requirements 
for Distributors of NOAA Electronic Navigational Charts (NOAA 
ENCs[supreg]). The certification allows entities to download, 
redistribute, repackage, or in some cases reformat, official NOAA ENCs 
and retain the NOAA ENC's official status. The regulations for 
implementing the Certification are at 15 CFR part 995. The 
recordkeeping and reporting requirements of 15 CFR part 995 form the 
basis for this collection of information. This information allows the 
Office of Coast Survey to administer the regulation, and to better 
understand the marketplace resulting in products to that meet the needs 
of the customer in a timely and efficient manner.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions; business or other 
for-profits organizations.
    Frequency: Semiannually and on occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eea1a7bcafb1bd9b8c83879d9d878180ae81838cc08b819ec0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f60667d6e707c5a4d42465c5c4640416f40424d014a405f01484059">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: August 6, 2018.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-17055 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JE-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Dr. Eugene A. BUSH, Sr. and W. D. Bush v. CITY OF LAUREL.

No. 47052.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 26, 1973.

Pack & Ratcliff, Laurel, for appellants.

Deavours, Weems & Gilchrist, Laurel, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Jones County; J. Shannon Clark, Chancellor.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and ROBERTSON, JJ.

Affirmed.