alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011262EN.01000201.xml

| 6.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6292 — Securitas/Niscayah Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 262/03

On 2 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6292. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6292. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2012322EN.01000101.xml

| 24.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 October 2012

2012/C 322/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3005 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4586 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81365 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6174 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2098 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4170 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,908 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 281,77 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1342 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5785 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3437 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2662 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2961 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0791 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6002 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5929 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 434,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3724 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1308 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5630 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 505,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9754 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,792 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,990 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6373 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8471 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,9210 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3005

JPY

Japanese yen

103,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4586

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81365

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6174

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2098

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4170

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,908

HUF

Hungarian forint

281,77

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1342

RON

Romanian leu

4,5785

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3437

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2662

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2961

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0791

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6002

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5929

KRW

South Korean won

1 434,96

ZAR

South African rand

11,3724

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1308

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5630

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 505,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9754

PHP

Philippine peso

53,792

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6150

THB

Thai baht

39,990

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6373

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8471

INR

Indian rupee

69,9210

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### William Eston et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Joseph Backer, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

February 17, 1953.

*Nathaniel L.*Goldstein, *Attorney-General (Henry P. Lips*comb, Jr., of counsel), for Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York.

*Sidney Sugerman*for defendant.

*Siegelbaum, Bosensweig é Palley*for plaintiffs.

Conroy, J.

This is a motion by the Attorney-General of the State of New York to vacate and set aside a subpcena duces tecum served upon the Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York. Section 537 of the Labor Law is clearly mandatory *163in its language and prevents the use, in any court in any action or proceeding pending therein unless the commissioner is a party therein, of information in his possession required by him in connection with unemployment insurance matters. The motion is granted and the subpoena is vacated.
No. 11475.

#### Phelps et al. *v.*The Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland.

Decided January 18, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of FEancock county. *Mr. George H. Phelps*and *Mr. William L. David,.*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Burket & Burket,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17194]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9982-12-OEI]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a New System of Records; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of 
Environmental Information (OEI), Office of Enterprise Information 
Programs (OEIP), eDiscovery Division, published a document in the 
Federal Register of July 27, 2018, giving notice that it proposes to 
establish a new system of records pursuant to the provisions of the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a). The document did not include the 
comments due by date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian K. Thompson, Acting Director, 
202-564-4256.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction

    In the Federal Register of July 27, 2018, in FR Doc. 2018-16117, on 
page 35637, in the first column, correct the DATES caption to read:

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on this system of records notice must 
do so by August 27, 2018. If no comments are received, the systems of 
records notice will become effective by August 27, 2018.

    Dated: August 7, 2018.
Amy Lamson,
Acting Director, Office of Policy, Regulatory Management Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-17194 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  Fourth Quarter 2004 and 2005

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                    Fourth    Fourth      90-Percent
                                   quarter   quarter Confidence interval(&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup> 2005
Type                                 2004      2005    of 2005       of     Percent
                                   estimate  estimate  estimate  difference of total

All housing units.................  122,740   124,509       (X)        (X)       100

  Occupied........................  107,546   108,888       325        296        87
    Owner occupied................   74,413    75,163       629        430        60
    Renter occupied...............   33,133    33,725       535        413        27

  Vacant..........................   15,194    15,621       350        310        13
    Year-round vacant.............   11,675    11,857       343        296        10
      For rent....................    3,731     3,626       169        190         3
      For sale only...............    1,375     1,566        95        116         1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy..........      901     1,059        71         97         1
      Held off market.............    5,668     5,606       243        212         5
        For occasional use........    1,916     1,819       141        124         1
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence elsewhere.    1,152     1,133       111         97         1
        For other reasons.........    2,600     2,654       169        146         2

    Seasonal vacant...............    3,519     3,764       223        192         3
	
    aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence interval is, 
in relation to the size of the estimate, the less reliable the estimate.
    (X)  Not Applicable.  Since the number of housing units is set equal to an independent national measure, there is no 
sampling error, and hence no confidence interval.
NOTE:  Since first quarter 2003, the Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey (CPS/HVS) estimates have been controlled to 
independent housing unit counts.  Doing so should make the CPS/HVS estimate of housing units more  comparable to other Census 
Bureau housing surveys.
#### Nathaniel JOHNSON, Relator, v. Hon. William K. LOVE, Judge, Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Polk County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 26, 1969.

Prohibition denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 11(a)
                            Blue Wave Systems Inc.

                      Computation of Per Share Net Income
                   (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               Three Months Ended
                                                                                                  December 31,
                                                                                           2000                  1999
                                                                                         -------               -------
<S>                                                                                     <C>                   <C>
 Basic Net Income Per Share:
  Net income applicable to common stock                                                  $   917               $   598
                                                                                         =======               =======

  Weighted average shares outstanding                                                     15,758                14,401

 Basic net income per share                                                              $  0.06               $  0.04
                                                                                         =======               =======

 Diluted Net Income Per Share:
  Weighted average shares outstanding                                                     15,758                14,401

  Effect of common stock equivalents:
    Options granted                                                                          845                 1,080
    Weighted average exercised options and warrants outstanding for portion of
     period, net of equivalent shares purchased at average fair market value                   9                   551
    Effect of using option proceeds to repurchase common stock at average
     fair market value                                                                      (349)                 (306)
                                                                                         -------               -------
      Total common stock equivalents                                                         505                 1,325
                                                                                         -------               -------
   Weighted average diluted shares outstanding                                            16,263                15,726
                                                                                         -------               -------

 Diluted net income per share                                                            $  0.06               $  0.04
                                                                                         =======               =======
</TABLE>
# C_2012367EN.01000501.xml

| 27.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 November 2012

2012/C 367/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2964 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4580 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80995 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5763 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2046 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3370 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,293 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 281,83 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1032 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5276 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3270 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2416 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2884 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0472 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5770 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5851 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 408,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5072 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0707 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5625 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 472,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9605 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,146 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2110 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,774 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6932 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8255 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,1120 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2964

JPY

Japanese yen

106,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4580

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80995

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5763

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2046

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3370

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,293

HUF

Hungarian forint

281,83

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1032

RON

Romanian leu

4,5276

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3270

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2416

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2884

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0472

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5770

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5851

KRW

South Korean won

1 408,22

ZAR

South African rand

11,5072

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0707

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5625

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 472,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9605

PHP

Philippine peso

53,146

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2110

THB

Thai baht

39,774

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6932

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8255

INR

Indian rupee

72,1120

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1986 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to provide for outreach, and 

coordination of services, to veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2014 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to provide 

for outreach, and coordination of services, to veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Streamlining Services 

5 for Older Veterans Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OUTREACH AND COORDINATION OF SERVICES TO 

7 VETERANS. 

8 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 102 of the Older Ameri9 cans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3002) is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (24)— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1986 IS

1 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

2 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

3 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the 

4 period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(D) status as a veteran.’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(55) The term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given 

9 the term in section 101 of title 38, United States 

10 Code.’’. 

11 (b) AREA PLAN.—Section 306(a) of the Older Ameri12 cans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3026(a)) is amended— 

13 (1) in paragraph (16), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

14 end; 

15 (2) in paragraph (17), by striking the period 

16 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

17 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(18) include information describing— 

19 ‘‘(A) how the area agency on aging will en20 gage in outreach to veterans who are eligible for 

21 services under this Act; and 

22 ‘‘(B) effective and efficient procedures for 

23 the coordination of services provided under this 

24 Act with services provided to veterans by the 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1986 IS

1 Department of Veterans Affairs and other pro2 viders.’’. 

3 (c) STATE PLAN.—Section 307(a) of the Older Amer4 icans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3027(a)) is amended by add5 ing at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(31) The plan shall include information de7 scribing— 

8 ‘‘(A) how the State agency will engage in 

9 outreach to veterans who are eligible for serv10 ices under this Act; and 

11 ‘‘(B) effective and efficient procedures for 

12 the coordination of services provided under this 

13 Act with services provided to veterans by the 

14 Department of Veterans Affairs and other pro15 viders.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

t0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

146829

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146829

COA: 309559 

Clinton CC: 11-008750-FH

LISA MARIE OLGER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
*

The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1988

___________

Edmund T. Biggs, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Southern

* District of Iowa.

Deere & Company; John Deere *

Company, sued as John Deere * [UNPUBLISHED]

Davenport Works; International Union, *

United Automobile, Aerospace & *

Agricultural Implement Workers of *

America, Local 281, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 20, 2006

Filed: May 2, 2006

___________

Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Edmund T. Biggs appeals the district court’s*

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in Biggs's Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) lawsuit.

Having conducted de novo review, see Torres v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 405
-2-

F.3d 670, 677 (8th Cir. 2005), we agree Biggs’s ERISA claims must fail: the issues

he raises are foreclosed by a settlement agreement he signed in 1991. Cf. Leavitt v.

Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 921 F.2d 160, 162 (8th Cir. 1990) (private settlements of ERISA

claims do not compromise policies underlying ERISA). Biggs offered no evidence

in support of his claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or improper conduct

involving either the settlement agreement or the calculation of his benefits. His

remaining assertions are either raised for the first time on appeal or are without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending

motion.

 ______________________________
**MODIFICATION AGREEMENT**

 

| MODIFICATION DATE: | August 31, 2007 |
|--------------------|-----------------|

 

| BORROWER: | i2 Telecom International, Inc. |
|-----------|--------------------------------|

 

| PROMISSORY NOTE DATED: | August 31, 2006 |
|------------------------|-----------------|

 

| ORIGINAL LOAN AMOUNT: | $273,000 |
|-----------------------|----------|

 

| MATURITY DATE: | August 31, 2007 |
|----------------|-----------------|

 

| TERMS TO BE MODIFIED: | Maturity date to be extended |
|-----------------------|------------------------------|

 

An additional 250,000 Warrants, exercisable at $.10, which expire three (3) years from the date of issuance. 

 

Maturity date to be extended to February 28, 2008.

 

i2 Telecom has recently brought current the principal and interest due.

 

i2 Telecom will make $4,000 per month principal payments commencing October 1, 2007.

 

The interest rate on the balance of the loan as of this date, $251,684.12 will accrue at 10% percent per annum. 

 

Default interest rate shall accrue at 18% per annum.

 

| NEW TERMS: | Maturity date to be extended to: |
|------------|----------------------------------|

February 28, 2008

 

The undersigned parties previously agreed to replace the terms of the original loan agreement set forth in the Promissory Note dated April 7, 2005 with a new Promissory Note dated August 31, 2006.  

 

| i2 Telecom International, Inc. | Hubert G. Phipps |
|--------------------------------|------------------|

 

 

 

| BY: | Paul R. Arena | BY: | Hubert G. Phipps |
|-----|---------------|-----|------------------|

| ITS: | CEO |
|------|-----|