alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**585 KA 12-02148** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JORGE DEJESUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SHERRY A. CHASE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered October 19, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a nonjury verdict of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). Supreme Court properly refused to suppress defendant’s statements and the weapons seized from the basement of his mother’s home. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the People established that defendant’s mother voluntarily consented to the search of her home ( see People v May , 100 AD3d 1411, 1412, lv denied 20 NY3d 1063; People v McCray , 96 AD3d 1480, 1481, lv denied 19 NY3d 1104). Defendant’s remaining contentions regarding the suppression hearing are not preserved for our review ( see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). “To the extent that defendant contends that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to raise [those issues] at the suppression hearing, we reject that contention because [t]here can be no denial of effective assistance of . . . counsel arising from [defense] counsel’s failure to make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of success” ( People v Watson , 90 AD3d 1666, 1667, lv denied 19 NY3d 868 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Defendant next contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence because he had only temporary innocent possession of the weapons. We reject that contention ( see People v Hicks , 110 AD3d**-2- 585 KA 12-02148** 

1488, 1488, lv denied 22 NY3d 1156). A person may be found to have had temporary and lawful possession of a weapon if, for example, “he found the weapon shortly before his possession of it was discovered and he intended to turn it over to the authorities” ( People v Almodovar , 62 NY2d 126, 130). The court here rejected that defense inasmuch as defendant did not turn over the weapons to the police despite the opportunity to do so. Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime in this nonjury trial ( see People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v Bleakley
, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or

severe.

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James WASHINGTON, Jr.

No. 60789.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 13, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. The ruling is correct.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, David A. Husband, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vodavi Technology, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize, and report financial information ; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 13 , 2006                                                       /s/ David A. Husband   David A. Husband   Chief Financial Officer  
18
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.77**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office 	301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax) 301-457-1037 (TDD) e-mail: 2000usa@census.gov Statistical Information Staff Population Division 301-457-2422 e-mail: pop@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12:01 A.M. EDT, (TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2001)

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Demographic Profile for Georgia

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the *Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000* for Georgia, a one-page table providing Census 2000 data on age and sex distribution, race, Hispanic origin, household relationship and type, housing occupancy and tenure (whether the housing occupant owns or rents). 

The profile includes nearly 100 data items in all, plus percentage distributions.

In addition to the profile of the state as a whole, similar demographic profiles for counties, places and other geographic components of the state can be accessed on an embargoed basis at <https://www.census.gov/dcmd/www/embargo/embargo_demoprofile.html>. After the release time, go to the Census Bureau's online search-and-retrieval database *American FactFinder* <http://factfinder2.census.gov> or to its Demographic Profile Page <https://www.census.gov/census2000/demoprofile.html>. You will also be able to download the profiles from the bureau's file transfer protocol site <http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/>. 

For information about how to order paper copies of Census 2000 demographic profiles, contact Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, 301-457-4100; or e-mail:<webmaster@census.gov>. 

For local context, contact the Georgia State Data Center, 404-463-1115; e-mail: <robert.giacomini@sdrc.gadata.org>.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert E.
Gowdy, Jr., as Principal Accounting Officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                              |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: August 6, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert E. Gowdy, Jr.                                    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Robert E. Gowdy, Jr. Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
# C_2012214EN.01000102.xml

| 20.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6615 — Nuvia/Coor/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 214/02

On 12 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6615. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6615. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# m SlO-100304-05 5

MtWCBi M 

# Mau i Hotel & Lodgin

g ASSOCIATIO N February 26 , 201 0

• { C D Secretary Ra y LaHoo di n U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n ^ 120 0 New Jerse y Ave. , S E, • Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Applicatio n o f

Hawaiia n AirKncsinih c 2010^tJTSr-iiancd aGombinatio nService s Allocatio n Proceeding , DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Deei r Secretary LaHood, I represen t

th e Mau i Hote l & Lodgin g Associatio n(MHLA) . MHL A i s comprise do f ove r 120 accommodatio n propertie s an dbusinesse s o nMaui ; an dcollectively, ou r membershi p employ s ove r 10,00 0 residents . MHL A i s th e legislativ e ar mo f th e Visito r

Industry . MHL A strongl y support s Hawaiia n Airlines ' applicatio nfor authority t o serv e Tokyo' s Haned a Airport . Fo r

man y years , visitor s fromJapa nhav e bee na nintegra l part

o f th e visito r

industr y i n Hawaii . Thes e value dvisitor s positivel y impac t ou r businesse s - a s Japanes e traveler s ar e amongs t th e highes t spettdijjg-visitor s i n Hawaii . Hawaiia nAirlines ' propose dne w dail y servic e fromHaned awil l provid e aconvenien t

wa y t o acces s t o ou r

islan dparadise , thu s makin g fravel eve nmor e desirabl e t o th e highl y freasuredJapanes e consumer . Th e economi c impac t

o f allowin g thi s servic e woul db e substantia l t o ou r visito r industr y base d economy . Touris mi s th e economi c engin e o f Hawaii ; an dth e majority o f ou r businesse s i nHawai i rel y upo n visito r

revenue s t o survive . Th e approva l o f thi s applicatio nwoul db e asignifican t boos t t o ou r strugglin g economy . MHL A strongl y urge s yo u t o gran t Hawaiia nAirlines ' application. Sincerely , Caro l Reiman n Executiv e Directo r

1727- B w mP aLoo p • Wailuku , H I 9679 3 • 808/244-862 5 • 808/244-309 4 fa x - mfo@mamhla.or g
#### Marie Louise Cambre Richard, wife of David Charles RICHARD v. David Charles RICHARD.

No. 62454.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Marie Louise Cambre Richard, wife of David Charles Richard, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.

DIXON, J., would grant the writ.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases American Community Survey (ACS) Miscellaneous Poverty
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.37 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, OCT. 20, 2011 Poverty: 2009 and 2010 This brief, based on the 2009 and 2010 American Community Survey results, compares poverty rates for the nation, states and large metropolitan statistical areas. The report also summarizes the distributions of income-to-poverty ratios for states and the District of Columbia. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acsbr10-01.pdf> [PDF]. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Dot Hill Systems Corp. on Form S-8 of our reports dated (1) January 25, 2000
related to the consolidated financial statements of Dot Hill Systems Corp. and
its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and for the year then ended, and (2)
May 5, 1999 related to the consolidated financial statements of Artecon, Inc.
and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999, and for each of the two years in the
period ended March 31, 1999 (not presented separately herein), appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dot Hill Systems Corp. for the year ended December
31, 1999.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
------------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Costa Mesa, California
August 11, 2000
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7055

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus VICTOR ADENIYI ALADEKOBA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-93-18, CA-00-1423-WMN) Submitted: October 3, 2001 Decided: October 18, 2001 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Victor Adeniyi Aladekoba, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Victor Adeniyi Aladekoba seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Aladekoba , Nos. CR-93-18; CA00-1423-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### NEWPORT MOTEL, INC., Appellant, v. DADE COUNTY and Richard Gerstein, State Attorney for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellees.

No. 69-135.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 20, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual Report of Medizone  International,  Inc. on
Form  10-KSB/A  for the  period  ended  December  31,  2003,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Edwin G.
Marshall, Chief Executive Officer and Steve M. Hanni, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


Date: April 15, 2004

                                 /s/ Edwin G. Marshall
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Edwin G. Marshall
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer
                                 Medizone International, Inc.

                                 /s/ Steve M. Hanni
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Steve M. Hanni
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 (Principal Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>
 
 EXHIBITS

 Computation of per share earnings - Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                          Three months ended                Nine months ended
                                             September 30,                     September 30,
                                      --------------------------       -----------------------
                                           1996        1995                1996        1995
                                      -------------  -----------       -----------  ----------
<S>                                   <C>            <C>              <C>           <C>
Average shares outstanding                 5,136,662   5,182,208          5,247,364   5,170,956
Average dilutive option shares               139,115     171,887            129,585     151,363
                                          ----------  ----------         ----------  ----------
Total average shares                       5,275,777   5,354,095          5,376,949   5,322,319
                                          ==========  ==========         ==========  ==========
 
Net income                                $3,041,000  $2,614,000         $8,855,000  $7,441,000
                                          ==========  ==========         ==========  ==========
Earnings per share                        $     0.58  $     0.49         $     1.65  $     1.40
                                          ==========  ==========         ==========  ==========
 
 
</TABLE>
 Selected Financial Data - Exhibit 99
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                  Three months ended           Nine months ended
                                                     September 30,               September 30,
                                                  -------------------          ------------------
                                                    1996       1995              1996      1995
                                                  --------   --------          --------   -------
<S>                                             <C>         <C>               <C>        <C>
Return on average assets (annualized)              1.16%       1.07%            1.15%       1.02%
Return on average equity (annualized)             12.94       11.60            12.41       11.37
 
</TABLE>

                                       23