alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.9

                                U.S. ENERGY CORP.
                            2001 STOCK AWARD PROGRAM


     U.S. Energy Corp. ("USE"), a Wyoming corporation with executive offices at
877 North 8th West, Riverton, Wyoming 82501, adopts this 2001 Stock Award Plan
effective as of January 15, 2002.

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of USE agreed to provide an annual
incentive compensation in the form of its common stock to certain officers of
USE as defined in SEC Rule 162-1(f) and such compensation arrangement was
approved by the shareholders of USE at its 2001 Annual Meeting in December,
2001.

     NOW THEREFORE, U.S. Energy Corp. adopts the following 2001 Stock Award
Program:

     1. An aggregate of up to 60,000 shares per year for the years 2001 through
2006 is available to be issued to five officers of USE including: John L.
Larsen, Keith G. Larsen, Daniel P. Svilar, Harold F. Herron and Robert S.
Lorimer, and Peter G. Schoonmaker, the president of its subsidiary Rocky
Mountain Gas, Inc. The taxes owed on such issuance shall be paid by USE and
provided the officer is employed by USE on the date of the grant.

     2. If fewer than 60,000 shares are issued during any year, the unissued
balance of the 60,000 share maximum will be available for issue in subsequent
years.

     3. The number of shares to be awarded each year out of such 60,000 shares
aggregate limit will be determined by the Compensation Committee of the USE
Board of Directors, and will be based on a variety of factors including the
Company's stock price, prior year's stock performance, the Company's financial
condition and business prospects and other factors deemed appropriate. Other
factors bearing on the prior year's profitability may be taken into
consideration by the USE Compensation Committee in determining the number of
shares to be issued.

<PAGE>


     4. The actual number of shares recommended by the Compensation Committee to
be awarded to the officers will be submitted for approval by the Company's CFO
to determine the amounts. However, it is anticipated at the number of shares
shall be 10,000 per officer per year.

     5. The total number of shares issued will be divided equally among the
officers.

     6. Such shares shall be issued annually on or before January 15 of each
applicable year as long as each officer noted above is employed by USE or Rocky
Mountain Gas, Inc. However, the Board of Directors reserves the right to defer
authorization to issue the shares at a later date during the same calendar year.
One half of said compensation shall be paid by USE's subsidiary Crested Corp.

     7. Such shares shall be registered under the Securities and Exchange Act of
1933, as amended, under a Form S-8 registration statement.

U.S. ENERGY CORP.



  /s/  Keith G. Larsen
------------------------------------
Keith G. Larsen, President
# C_2013180EN.01001101.xml

| 26.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6613 — Watson/Actavis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 180/04

On 5 October 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6613. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6613. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Ben W. KERN v. Gus NOBLE et al.

No. 44706.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 15, 1968.

Suggestion of Error Overruled Feb. 5, 1968.

Satterfield, Shell, Williams & Buford, Jackson, for appellant.

Nelson Cauthen, Canton, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NUMBER 13-18-00526-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

LEOBARDO ARAGUZ, APPELLANT,

v.

DEMPSIE CLINTON AND VICTORIA 

CLINTON, ET AL. APPELLEES.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 107th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas

____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

On September 25, 2018, appellant advised the Court that appellees City of 

Harlingen, Texas, and City of Harlingen, Texas Police Department have filed a “Notice of 

Removal” removing the case and all parties to the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Texas, Brownsville Division on September 18, 2018. 
2

Once removal is effected, the state court loses jurisdiction over the case. 28 

U.S.C. § 1446(d); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Murray, 935 F.2d 89, 92-93 (5th Cir. 1991). 

Any order entered by a state court after the case is removed is void for want of jurisdiction. 

Resolution Trust, 935 F.2d at 92-93. Jurisdiction re-vests in the state court when the 

federal district court executes the remand order and mails a certified copy to the state 

court. Quaestor Invs., Inc. v. Chiapas, 997 S.W.2d 226, 229 (Tex. 1999).

Given these circumstances, we remove this appeal from the Court's docket. This 

appeal is abated and will be treated as a closed case. The cause may be reinstated on 

prompt motion by any party showing that the cause has been remanded to state court 

and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed

this the 12th day of October, 2018.
#### Ralph N. MILLS v. STATE.

No. 36630.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
cpanrwan oF SowtienOR AND LABOR-BUREAU.OF THE OBnaUe wrjg omen oemerns
ae CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1910, SBSpuaTion Enuwanarion Diermicr No.

Tie oF mcontonareD race (oie. ns Wag or es

1 a nt ot rT Tee OO

lh

|e an

Guguslacte.
ye 4:

im bal || te ‘

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit hetp//wwarchives.gov for more information about publicly available the one shown here,

bir Arnesane hie 2 Meng, SEG
‘Get pagina. lorntGngini oa
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 70

                                                                   Exhibit 12


<TABLE>
              American General Finance, Inc. and Subsidiaries
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<CAPTION>
                                         Years Ended December 31,         
                               1997      1996      1995      1994      1993  
                                          (dollars in thousands)
<S>                          <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings:
  Income before provision
    for income taxes and 
    cumulative effect of
    accounting changes       $204,353  $ 53,483  $115,549  $392,001  $336,830
  Interest expense
    (including $23,221  
    for 1997 to fund  
    assets held for sale)     484,496   493,051   517,475   416,233   379,764
  Implicit interest in rents   10,810    12,007    12,817    10,741    10,462

Total earnings               $699,659  $558,541  $645,841  $818,975  $727,056


Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense
    (including $23,221 
    for 1997 to fund  
    assets held for sale)    $484,496  $493,051  $517,475  $416,233  $379,764
  Implicit interest in rents   10,810    12,007    12,817    10,741    10,462

Total fixed charges          $495,306  $505,058  $530,292  $426,974  $390,226


Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges                  1.41      1.11      1.22      1.92      1.86
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
#### William Alfred LAMOS, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 72-869.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1973.

Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Welsh & Carroll, Miami, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant brought an action seeking to recover against the defendant under his homeowner’s policy, for an automobile accident which occurred off the premises. The automobile in question was owned by *553the homeowner and being driven by his son.

The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company, because of the provision in the policy that contained the following exclusion:

> * * * * * *

> “Section II of this Policy Does not Apply:

> ifc ‡ >}c >fi ‡ *

> “(b) under Coverages E and F, to the ownership, maintenance, operation, use, loading or unloading of (1) automobiles or midget automobiles while away from the premises or the ways immediately adjoining, * * *”

> * * * * * ' *

This appeal ensued.

The appellant contends that notwithstanding this exclusion the homeowner should be liable under the policy because of his execution of an application for his minor son to obtain an operator’s permit to drive a motor vehicle, pursuant to § 322.09, Fla.Stat.1 F.S.A. We affirm.

We find the exclusion to be valid in the homeowner’s policy and, under the state of the record, the trial judge was correct in his ruling. Morari v. Atlantic Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 105 Ariz. 573, 468 P. 2d 564; Herzog v. National American Insurance Company, 2 Cal.3d 192, 84 Cal. Rptr. 705, 465 P.2d 841; Huggins v. Yoshiwara, 2 Cal.3d 200, 84 Cal.Rptr. 709, 465 P.2d 845; La Bonte v. Federal Mutual Insurance Company, 159 Conn. 252, 268 A.2d 663; Lang v. General Insurance Company of America, 268 Minn. 36, 127 N.W.2d 541.

Affirmed.

1

. Which provides in part, as follows:

> 

> “(3) Any negligence or willful misconduct of a minor under the age of eighteen years when driving a motor vehicle upon a highway shall be imputed to the person or head of a family who has signed the application of such minor for a permit or license, which person shall be jointly and severally liable with such minor for any damages caused by such negligence or willful misconduct.”
#### AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation, Petitioner, v. Dessie E. GRESHAM, Respondent.

No. 36614.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 24, 1968.

Donald L. Gattis, Jr., of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando, for petitioner.

Albert Yurko, Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After oral argument and upon further consideration, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

CALDWELL, C. J., dissents.
# **Exhibit 15**

# ** **

**LETTER OF AWARENESS FROM DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP**

 

To the Board of Directors and

Shareholders of Investors Financial Services Corp:

 

We have made a review, in accordance with standardsof the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of theunaudited interim financial information of Investors Financial Services andsubsidiaries for the periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, as indicated inour report dated August 9, 2005; because we did not perform an audit, weexpressed no opinion on that information.

 

We are aware that our report referred to above,which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2005, is incorporated by reference in the followingRegistration Statements:

 

Filed on Form S-8:

RegistrationStatement No. 333-72786

RegistrationStatement No. 333-79639

RegistrationStatement No. 333-43353

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is notconsidered a part of the Registration Statements prepared or certified by anaccountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within themeaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

 
|  /s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Boston, Massachusetts                   |
| August 9, 2005                     |

 

----
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 71

                                                                 Exhibit 23






                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We  consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3  Number 33-47865) of  American General  Finance, Inc. and  in the
related Prospectus of our  report dated February 16, 1999, with  respect to
the consolidated  financial statements  and  schedule of  American  General
Finance, Inc. and subsidiaries  included in this Annual Report  (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                           ERNST & YOUNG, LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana
March 17, 1999
<PAGE>
# C_2012006EN.01000101.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/1

---

2012/C 6/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 370, 17.12.2011

OJ C 370, 17.12.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 362, 10.12.2011

OJ C 355, 3.12.2011

OJ C 347, 26.11.2011

OJ C 340, 19.11.2011

OJ C 331, 12.11.2011

OJ C 319, 29.10.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Center for 
Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Inherited Disease Research Access 
Committee.
    Date: September 7, 2018.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR), McHenry 
Conference Room, 1812 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205.
    Contact Person: Barbara J. Thomas, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Ste. 
4076, MSC 9306, Bethesda, MD 20892-9306, 301-402-0838, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0b2b1a2b2b1a2b1fea4b8bfbdb1a390beb9b8feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="066467746467746728726e696b677546686f6e28616970">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 7, 2018.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-17340 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2012400EN.01000401.xml

| 28.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 December 2012

2012/C 400/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3218 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4616 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8175 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6323 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,207 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3695 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,127 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 290,19 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0816 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4181 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3769 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2715 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3124 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2447 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6071 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6129 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 419,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,342 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2394 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,544 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 762,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0511 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,362 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,503 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,46 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7487 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0977 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,64 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3218

JPY

Japanese yen

111,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4616

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8175

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6323

CHF

Swiss franc

1,207

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3695

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,127

HUF

Hungarian forint

290,19

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0816

RON

Romanian leu

4,4181

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3769

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2715

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3124

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2447

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6071

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6129

KRW

South Korean won

1 419,69

ZAR

South African rand

11,342

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2394

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,544

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 762,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0511

PHP

Philippine peso

54,362

RUB

Russian rouble

40,503

THB

Thai baht

40,46

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7487

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0977

INR

Indian rupee

72,64

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Martin A. FLEISCHMAN, Appellant, v. Marvin Odell ADAMS and Carl C. Rising, Appellees.

No. 67-1087.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 2, 1968.

Ligman, Shepherd & Nettlow, Miami, for appellant.

Alfred Gustinger, Jr., Kenneth L. Rys-kamp, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rules stated in Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So. 2d 669, and Simpson v. Clay, Fla.App. 1962, 139 So.2d 494.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 28, 2011

h1219

Order 

December 28, 2011

143714 & (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143714

COA: 301859

LARRY WHIDDILL McNEAL STOVALL, Mason CC: 05-201503-FC

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 22, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion for stay of proceedings is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR CHARTER MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001043325
<NAME> CHARTER MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      45,094,076
<SECURITIES>                               684,773,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,530,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                   138,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               417,327
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             762,229,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       92,219,057
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 330,010,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               762,229,340
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,502,804
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,332,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,977,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,192,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,192,457
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56


</TABLE>