alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012372EN.01000102.xml

| 1.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6762 — Advent International Corporation/Mediq)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 372/02

On 27 November 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6762. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6762. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Approved under assigned authority

On March 22, 2010*

Linda L. Lundell (for) 

Director, Office of International Aviation

BEFORE THE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_____________________________________

Application of )

)

 MESA AIRLINES, INC )

) Docket DOT-OST-2009-0212

for an exemption pursuant )

to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 )

(Phoenix, Arizona – Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, )

and San Jose del Cabo, Mexico) )

_____________________________________ )

MOTION OF MESA AIRLINES, INC.

FOR A TEMPORARY DORMANCY WAIVER

(Phoenix, Arizona – Puerto Vallarta, Mexico)

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Brian S. Gillman

Executive Vice President & General Counsel

Mesa Air Group, Inc.

410 N. 44th Street, 

Suite 700

Phoenix, Arizona 85008

(602) 685-4051

Brian.Gillman@mesa-air.com

March 12, 2010

NOTICE: US Airways, Inc. plans to poll on this application on behalf of Mesa 

Airlines, Inc., and therefore requests that any parties wishing to support or 

oppose this application submit their answers on or before March 19, 2010.

__________________________________

* Based on the circumstances presented regarding Mesa’s temporary cessation of its PhoenixPuerto Vallarta service, we have granted Mesa’s request for a temporary dormancy waiver to 

allow the 90-day dormancy notice period to begin on August 21, 2010, the date Mesa proposes 

recommencement of the subject service. 

We acted on this request without awaiting expiration of the answer period with the consent of all 

parties served.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE EARNINGS STATEMENT AND THE BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  THIS FINANCIAL
DATA SCHEDULE IS RESTATED DUE TO THE CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING STANDARD FOR 
EARNINGS PER SHARE (SFAS 128). 
 
</LEGEND> 
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997 
<CASH>                                             893 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,673 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        96 
<INVENTORY>                                      1,005 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,882 
<PP&E>                                           6,045 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,582 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,880 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,535 
<BONDS>                                            568<F1> 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                        286 
<COMMON>                                             5 
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,687 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,880 
<SALES>                                          1,635 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,662 
<CGS>                                              503 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      503 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   283<F2> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    294 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                194 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       194 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37 
<FN> 
<F1>EXCLUDES COMPANY'S GUARANTEE OF ESOP DEBT:  240 
<F2>ONLY INCLUDES R&D EXPENSE. 
</FN> 
         


</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1954 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on supervision 

requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in critical access and 

small rural hospitals through 2014. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2014 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. THUNE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction 

on supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic 

services in critical access and small rural hospitals 

through 2014. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1954 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION 

2 ON SUPERVISION REQUIREMENTS FOR OUT3 PATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN CRIT4 ICAL ACCESS AND SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS 

5 THROUGH 2014. 

6 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

7 continue to apply through calendar year 2014 the enforce8 ment instruction described in the notice of the Centers for 

9 Medicare & Medicaid Services entitled ‘‘Enforcement In10 struction on Supervision Requirements for Outpatient 

11 Therapeutic Services in Critical Access and Small Rural 

12 Hospitals for CY 2013’’, dated November 1, 2012 (pro13 viding for an exception to the restatement and clarification 

14 under the final rulemaking changes to the Medicare hos15 pital outpatient prospective payment system and calendar 

16 year 2009 payment rates (published in the Federal Reg17 ister on November 18, 2008, 73 Fed. Reg. 68702 through 

18 68704) with respect to requirements for direct supervision 

19 by physicians for therapeutic hospital outpatient services). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
MSA deaths total NAME ST PM25_80 80 382 1390 AKRO OH 25.98638 200 672 2721 ALBU NM 12.88642 240 1710 5978 ALLE PA 19.52651 520 2415 9699 ATLA GA 22.56885 720 2510 9410 BALT MD 21.69226 1000 921 3799 BIRM AL 28.68795 1080 165 664 BCIT ID 18.00521 1120 1401 6140 BOST MA 18.0608 1280 885 3389 BUFF NY 26.51179 1480 356 1222 CHAR WV 21.67634 1520 1246 4503 CHAR NC 24.12144 1560 1064 3984 CHAT TN 20.39319 1600 7348 26459 CHIC IL 22.96822 1640 2278 8036 CINC OH 24.9979 1680 2204 8254 CLEV OH 27.89488 1920 2454 10354 DALL TX 18.75937 2000 1828 6732 DAYT OH 20.81202 2320 678 2505 EPAS TX 16.9023 2960 1866 6852 GARY IN 27.476 3280 972 4178 HART CT 18.39489 3360 1001 5000 HOUS TX 18.04209 3480 1449 5306 INDI IN 23.09249 3560 720 2479 JACK MS 18.13386 3640 478 1976 JCIT NJ 19.9121 3760 1427 5117 KANS MO 17.84884 4400 940 3153 LROC AR 20.57733 4480 6357 24403 LANG CA 26.75177 5120 3610 16472 MINN MN 15.51719 5160 1365 4433 MOBI AL 22.02958 5360 1553 5316 NASH TN 22.61227 5600 2871 10770 NYOR NY 23.90641 5720 1558 5313 NORF VA 19.54246 5880 31 157 OKLA OK 14.97667 5920 1173 4727 OMAH NB 15.276 6160 3913 15130 PHIL PA 24.07039 6200 3257 9700 PHOE AZ 18.48407 6280 3642 12311 PITT PA 30.0091 6440 1649 6043 PORT OR 19.80227 6480 1971 7511 PROV RI 14.23409 6560 138 602 PUEB CO 10.91556 6640 635 2501 RALE NC 21.02156 6720 92 335 RENO NV 13.11842 7040 2169 8428 SLOU MO 22.72947 7160 3371 9961 SLAK UT 17.49919 7320 1555 5093 SDIE CA 18.91896 7360 1868 6944 SFRA CA 16.35221 7400 1643 6480 SJOS CA 17.78845 7600 1709 6968 SEAT WA 14.91211 7840 567 2262 SPOK WA 13.51998 8000 615 2280 SPRI MA 17.56818 8080 568 1678 STEU OH 29.688288280 3630 10857 TAMP FL 13.73372 8440 623 2259 TOPE KS 11.7518 8840 4241 16917 WASH DC 25.92881 9040 997 3231 WICH KS 15.02217 9160 534 2102 WILM DE 20.37429 9240 340 1304 WORC MA 16.26415 9320 821 2776 YOUN OH 22.94041
#### Joan V. HUDSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 4408.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Jan. 25, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 25, 1974.

William T. Kivett, La. Dept, of Highways, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

Pharis & Pharis by F. Jean Pharis, Walter M. Hunter, Jr., Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee.

Gist, Methvin & Trimble by David A. Hughes, Alexandria, for defendant-appel-lee.

*506Before CULPEPPER, MILLER and DOMENGEAUX, JJ.

MILLER, Judge.

This case was consolidated for trial and appeal purposes- with Hudson v. State of Louisiana, 289 So.2d 503 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974) [# 4407]. The factual and legal issues are identical.

The parties do not seek to amend the amount awarded by the trial court. It would serve no purpose to name the third party intervenor and set forth the various awards.

For the reasons assigned in the cited case, the trial court judgment is affirmed. Costs of court are taxed to appellant as allowed by LSA-R.S. 13:4521.

Affirmed.
#### UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Margaret SISUNG and William H. Groner, Appellees.

No. 66-961.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 12, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 9, 1967.

George J. Baya, Miami, for appellant.

Bolles, Goodwin & Ryskamp, Miami, Shorenstein & Lewis, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., BARKDULL, J., and LOPEZ, AQUILI-NO, Jr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This case has previously been before the appellate courts. See: Underwriters Insurance Company v. Sisung, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 461; Groner v. Underwriters Insurance Company, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 123. Following the last opinion of this court, the matter came on for trial before the trial court, non-jury, on the issues as made by the pleadings. The appellant attempted to avoid liability upon the affirmative defense of estoppel by judgment or res adjudicata, upon the authority of Elizabethport Cordage Company v. Whitlock, 37 Fla. 190, 20 So. 255; McGregor v. Provident Trust Company of Philadelphia, 119 Fla. 718, 162 So. 323. The trial judge found adverse to the contention of the appellant-defendant and held it liable to the appellee-plaintiff, Margaret Sisung, as a named beneficiary under the mortgage clause of the insurance policy. This appeal seeks review of this final judgment, the appellant contenting the trial judge committed error in the entry thereof. The appellee, Margaret Sisung, has cross-assigned error on the failure of the trial judge to award attorney’s fees pursuant to § 627.0127, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.

We affirm the entry of the judgment, there being insufficient evidence to support the affirmative defenses urged by the appellant and sufficient, competent evidence to support the judgment in favor of the appellee. See: Wash Bowl, Inc. v. Miami Coin-O-Wash #3, Inc., Fla. App.1966, 184 So.2d 674; Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Company, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 551; Best Concrete Corporation v. Oswalt *232Engineering Service Corporation, Fla. App.1966, 188 So.2d 587.

We find merit to the appellee’s cross-assignment and hold that the trial court should have awarded [in the final judgment] an attorney’s fee to the appellee as the successful party in that litigation and as named beneficiary under the mortgage clause in the insurance policy. See: § 627.0127, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.; Salter v. National Indemnity Co., Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 147.

Therefore, the final judgment here under review is hereby affirmed, with directions to the trial court to amend same by including therein a reasonable amount to be awarded to the appellee, Margaret Sis-ung, for attorney’s fees.

Affirmed with directions.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.4

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                 DENNIS W. WALSH


       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, Dennis W. Walsh,
hereby constitutes and appoints Laurence C. Leslie or Peter A. Allen his true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign the Form 10-K of Data Dimensions, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, and any
amendments or supplements thereto, and to file this Power of Attorney and the
Form 10-K, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq National
Market System, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and
authority to do and perform each requisite and necessary to be done in and about
the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and
agent, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


        Dated this 22nd day of March, 2001.


Signature:


/s/ DENNIS W. WALSH
------------------------------
Dennis W. Walsh
# C_2012275EN.01000401.xml

| 12.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/4

---

Call for proposals under the work programme of the seventh EC framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities

2012/C 275/06

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the work programmes of the seventh framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call in the ‘Cooperation’ specific programme: Information and communication technologies: FP7-ICT-2013-EU-Brazil.

the ‘Cooperation’ specific programme: Information and communication technologies: FP7-ICT-2013-EU-Brazil

Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the website:

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/home

---
# C_2012203EN.01000501.xml

| 11.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6625 — Nordic Capital/Tokmanni)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 203/02

On 2 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6625. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6625. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      149
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   450
<PP&E>                                              35
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              217
<BONDS>                                            163
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,473
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,286)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       950
<SALES>                                            252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   252
<CGS>                                              120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (16)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (50)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (50)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (50)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2012134EN.01000501.xml

| 8.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 May 2012

2012/C 134/08

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3033 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 104,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4366 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80647 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9105 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2012 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5635 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,025 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 286,48 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6995 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1958 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4060 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3000 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2792 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2983 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1169 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6378 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6265 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 482,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2020 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1984 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5075 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 000,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9803 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,246 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,1819 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,402 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5098 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1840 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,9580 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3033

JPY

Japanese yen

104,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4366

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80647

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9105

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2012

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5635

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,025

HUF

Hungarian forint

286,48

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6995

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1958

RON

Romanian leu

4,4060

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3000

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2792

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2983

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1169

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6378

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6265

KRW

South Korean won

1 482,15

ZAR

South African rand

10,2020

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1984

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5075

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 000,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9803

PHP

Philippine peso

55,246

RUB

Russian rouble

39,1819

THB

Thai baht

40,402

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5098

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1840

INR

Indian rupee

68,9580

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 246 (Thursday, December 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 79679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32774]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a $74 million long-
term guarantee to support the export of approximately $87 million worth 
of mining equipment, locomotives and railcars to Canada. The U.S. 
exports will enable the Canadian mining company to increase production 
by about 5 million metric tons of iron ore per year during the 8.5-year 
repayment term of the guarantee. Available information indicates that 
all of the additional Canadian iron ore production will be sold in 
China. Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction by 
email to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue NW., 
Room 947, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of the date this notice 
appears in the Federal Register.

Angela Mariana Freyre,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-32774 Filed 12-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```