alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 
	
	SEE REVERSE FOR IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING OWNERSHIP ANDTRANSFER RESTRICTIONS AND CERTAIN OTHER INFORMATION
CUSIP 13000T 10 9SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARECOMMON STOCK
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
0000001
SPECIMENFULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK $0.0001 PAR VALUE, OF CALIBERCOS INC.transferable on the books of the Company in Person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate and the shares represented hereby, are issued and shall be held subject to all of the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, as it may be amended, and the Bylaws, as they may be amended, of the Company (copies of which are on file with the Company and with the Transfer Agent), to all of which each holder, by acceptance hereof, assents. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.





     


     


    	
	Continental StockTransfer    Continental Stock TTransfer   Continental StockTStock Transfer   Continental StockTContinental StockTransfer   Continental StockTTransfer   Continental StockTStock Transfer   Continental StockTContinental StockTTransfer   Continental StockTStock Transfer   Continental StockTContinental StockTTransfer   Continental StockTStock TContinental StockTTransfer   Continental StockTStock TContinental StockTTStock TTStock TTStock TTransfer   Transfer   Transfer   Continental Transfer   Transfer   Continental Transfer   Transfer   Continental Stock Transfer   Continental ransfer   Continental StockTransfer   Transfer   Continental Stock Transfer   Continental Transfer   Continental StockTransfer   Transfer  Continental Stock ransfer   Continental StockTransfer   Continental Transfer   Continental StockTransfer   Transfer   Continental Stock Transfer   Continental StockTransfer   Continental Transfer   Continental StockTransfer
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Stefan A. Bird, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Salton Sea Funding Corporation;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 3, 2004
 
 /s/ Stefan A. Bird
 Stefan A. Bird
 President
 (chief executive officer)
# C_2011358EN.01005001.xml

| 8.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/50

---

Call for applications 2012

Second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-2013)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 358/08

A call for applications ‘Health — 2012’ is launched today within the framework of the second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-2013) (1).

1

This call for applications consists of the following parts:

| — | a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of projects, |
| --- | --- |

—

a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of projects,

| — | a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of conferences, |
| --- | --- |

—

a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of conferences,

| — | a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to the functioning of non-governmental bodies and specialised networks (operating grants), |
| --- | --- |

—

a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to the functioning of non-governmental bodies and specialised networks (operating grants),

| — | an invitation to Member States and participating countries for submission of joint actions. |
| --- | --- |

—

an invitation to Member States and participating countries for submission of joint actions.

The deadline for submissions of the proposals under each call is 9 March 2012.

9 March 2012

All the information, including the Commission Decision of 1 December 2011 on the adoption of the work plan for 2012 for the implementation of the second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-2013), and on the selection, award and other criteria for financial contributions to the actions of this programme (2), are available on the website of the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers at the following address:

2

http://ec.europa.eu/eahc

---

(1)  Decision No 1350/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 establishing a second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-2013) (OJ L 301, 20.11.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  See page 8 of this Official Journal.

2

---
#### Pauline G. WILSON and Russell H. Wilson, Jr., Appellants, v. Hanson A. MITCHELL and Shirley D. Mitchell, his wife, Henry Lubin and Evelyn Lubin, his wife, B. N. Inman and Margaret Inman, his wife, and Irving Zimmerman, Appellees.

No. 67-8.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 24, 1967.

*214Ralph F. Miles, Hialeach, for appellants.

Martin Lemlich, Miami, for Inmans, ap-pellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, the Wilsons,, have appealed from an adverse summary final decree entered by the Chancellor below.

The burden of a party moving for a summary decree is that of showing conclusively the non-existence of any material •issues of fact. See Holl v. Talcott, Fla. 1966, 191 So.2d *40.*

It would appear that there was an unresolved issue of fact as to whether one of the defendants, Irving Zimmerman, acted in the capacity of agent for two of the other defendants, the Inmans. The movants have failed to resolve this issue conclusively as there are reasonable inferences which may be drawn in favor of the non-moving parties. The question of whether the Inmans were bona fide purchasers for value under the circumstances similarly should not have been determined by a summary final decree.

Accordingly the summary final decree is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.42 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, OCT. 26, 2011 American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States Wall Map: 2010 This map shows the American Indian and Alaska Native areas reported or delineated for the 2010 Census. The map also contains related graphics that reflect 2010 Census statistics. The printed map is 48-by-36 inches with a map of the U.S. on the front and an enlargement for Alaska on the reverse side. Internet address: < https://www.census.gov/geo/www/maps/aian2010_wall_map/aian_wall_map.html>. **No news release associated with this map. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2012317EN.01000101.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6702 — Carlyle/BC Partners/Hamilton Sundstrand Industrial)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 317/01

On 10 October 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6702. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6702. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### The EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, a United States banking corporation, Appellant, v. Arne ROCK and Grand Turk Line, Ltd., a corporation, and Prudence Mutual Casualty Company, a corporation, Appellees.

No. 66-1109.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 21, 1967.

*53Ward, Ward, Straessley, Hiss & Kluttz, Miami, for appellant.

Alfred M. Carvajal, Moore & Moore, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In a suit for declaratory decree filed in Dade County, Florida, the appellant, a national bank resident and “established” in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, was joined as a defendant, and a mandatory injunction was sought against the bank. It was alleged the bank had entered into a contractual arrangement in Dade County through a certain individual as its agent. Service on the bank was made in Dade County by serving said individual as its agent. The bank moved to quash service, claiming improper venue. The motion and a supporting affidavit disclosed the location of the national bank in Illinois and that it maintained only one banking office, which was in that state. The bank’s claim of improper venue was based on § 94 of Title 12, U.S.C.A., relating to national banks, which provides as follows:

> "Actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the United States held within the district in which such' association may be established, or in any State, county, or municipal court in the county or city in which said association is located having jurisdiction in similar cases.”

The chancellor denied the motion, and the bank filed this interlocutory appeal. The federal statute prescribing venue in the district or county in which the bank is located is mandatory, unless waived. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau, 371 U.S. 555, 83 S.Ct. 520, 9 L.Ed.2d 523.

We consider inapplicable the case of County of Okeechobee v. Florida Nat. Bank, 112 Fla. 309, 150 So. 124, relied on by appellees. It was held there that a national bank sued in a county other than where located, had waived the improper venue. In addition, in that case there was presented the special circumstance that the action was upon a joint obligation of two national banks, one being located in the county in which the action was filed.

In our opinion the motion filed on behalf of the defendant national bank should have been granted, and accordingly the order appealed from is reversed.

Reversed.
----

**U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION****WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549**

**FORM 10-KSB
**(Mark One)[X]      ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES             EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2003**o**r**

**[  ]       TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES             EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

For the transition period from  To

Commission file number         0-4846-3                                                   

**MEMS USA, Inc.**(formerly LumaLite Holdings, Inc.)(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

                                                                                   Nevada                                                                                  82-0288840                     State or other jurisdiction of                                                     (I.R.S. Employer                     incorporation or organization)                                                    Identification No.)

                                                                                                                        378 North Main, #124, Layton, Utah 84041                                                (Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip code)

(Former address)**
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39510-39511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17011]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 18, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(202) 317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, September 18, 
2018, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is 
invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for 
consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent 
to participate must be made with Antoinette Ross. For more information 
please contact: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-4110, or

[[Page 39511]]

write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 1509, National 
Office, Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The committee will be discussing various issues related to Taxpayer 
Communications and public input is welcome.

    Dated: August 1, 2018.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-17011 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases African American Business Ownership En Español
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-R.18SP **Contact:**  Briana Kaya Public Information Office
301-763-3030/3762 (fax)
 PARA PUBLICACIÓN INMEDIATA:  MARTES, 8 DE FEBRERO DE 2011 La Oficina del Censo Revela un Aumento de 14 Por Ciento en el Número de Empresas Cuyos Propietarios son de Raza Negra en el Área Metropolitana de Los Ángeles El número de empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra en el área estadística  metropolitana de Los Ángeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, Calif., aumentó a 64,038 en el 2007 de 56,228 en el 2002, lo cual representa un aumento de 13.9 por ciento, anunció hoy la Oficina del Censo de los Estados Unidos. Durante el mismo período, los ingresos generados por dichas empresas aumentaron 120.5 por ciento $12.1 mil millones. A nivel nacional, el número de empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra aumentó a 1.9 millones de empresas, un aumento de 60.5 por ciento, y las ventas de dichas empresas aumentaron a $137.5 mil millones, un aumento de 55.1 por ciento. Las industrias en el área metropolitana con el mayor número de empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra incluyen cuidado de salud y asistencia social (12,320 empresas) y servicios de reparación, mantenimiento, personales y  de lavandría (9,406 empresas). Dichos datos provienen de la Encuesta de Empresarios de 2007, la cual forma parte del Censo Económico de 2007. La encuesta provee información detallada cada cinco años sobre empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra, incluyendo el número de firmas, ventas e ingresos, número de empleados remunerados y nómina anual para estados, condados, ciudades y áreas metropolitanas.  La Encuesta de Empresarios se levanta cada cinco años como parte del censo económico. La encuesta de 2007 recopiló datos de una muestra de más de 2.3 millones de empresas. Los datos recopilados en la muestra de una encuesta están sujetos a la variabilidad de la muestra y a errores ajenos al muestreo. Los errores ajenos al muestreo se deben a errores en las respuestas, falta de respuestas o cobertura. Para más información acerca del diseño, metodología y limitaciones de los datos de la Encuesta de Empresarios, consulte  <https://www.census.gov/econ/sbo/methodology.html>. Nota del editor: Los datos están disponibles en  https://www.census.gov/econ/sbo/.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
##### 



Exhibit 32(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of CheckFree Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter J. Kight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 8, 2005
    
    /s/ Peter J. KightPeter J. Kight
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
CheckFree Corporation
 This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.