Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that thi s opinion should not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40489 Su m m ar y Cal endar

DA NNYA L L EN P l a i n tiff - A p p ell a n t v. C O U N T YO F G A L V E S T O N , T E XA S ; G E A N L E O N A R D , G a lve ston C ou n ty S h e riff D efen da n t s - A pp el l ees

A p p ea lf

rom the U n i tedS tates D i stri ct C ou rt f or t h e Sou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 3: 07- C V

- 341

B ef ore D AV IS, SM ITH , an d D E N N IS, C i rcui tJu dg es . P E R C U R IA M: * Pl ai nt i f f D annyAl l e n c l ai m s t hathe w as t e r m i nat e d f r o m hi s j o b w i t h t he G alvest on C ou n t y S h erif f ’ s O f f i ce because h e i s A f

ri can - A m eri can . Th e di st ri ct
c our tgr ant ed s um m ar y j udgm enti n t he def endant s’favoron t he bas i s t hat Al l e n h ad fa i l e d t o t i m e l y f i l e ac har ge o f

e m pl o ym e ntdi s c r i m i nat i o n wi t h t he E qu alEm pl o ym e ntO ppo r t uni t y Com m i s s i o n ( EE O C)

. The c o ur the l d, i n t he United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November

5, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 40489

2 al t erna t ive, t h a t A ll e n h ad fai l ed to est abli sh a p ri m a faci e case of di s c r i m i nat i o n a nd t hatt he C o unt y hadl e git i m at e , no ndi s c r i m i nat o r y r e as o ns f o rt e r m i nat i ng Al l e n. W e a f f i r m t he di s t r i c tco ur t ’ s g r anto f s um m ar y j udg m e nt b e c a u s e Al l e n fa i l e dt o t i m e l yf i l e ac h a r g e wi t h t h e EEOC. W e revi ew t h e di st ri ct court’ s grant of sum m ary j u dg m en tde n ovo. S ettlem ent Fu n d i ng, L L Cv. Tran sA m eri ca O cci d entalL if e I n s. Co. , 555 F. 3d 42 2, 4 24 ( 5t h Ci r . 2 00 9)

. Sum m ar y j udg m e nti s a ppr o pr i at e w he n “t he r e i s no ge nui ne i s s ue a s t o a ny m at e r i alfac ta nd .

. . t he m o va nti s e nt i t l e d t o j udg m e nt
a s am a tt e ro f la w .” F e d . R . C iv . P . 5 6 (c ). A Ti t l e VI I pl ai nt i f

f i n Te xa s m us tf

i l e ac har ge o f

di s c r i m i nat i o n wi t h t he E E O C w i t hi n 300 days af t erl ear ni ng of

t he unl aw f

ulem pl oym entpr ac t i c e t hat is a lle g e d

. Hu ckab ay v. Mo o re , 1 4 2 F .3 d2 3 3 , 2 3 8 (5 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ); 4 2 U .S .C . § 200 0e- 5( e) ( 1)

. Th i s l i m i t ati on peri od i s not t ol l ed byt h e pen den cy of a gri evan ce o ro t he rr e vi e w pr o c e s s t hatm ayt ak e pl ac e a f t e rt he e m pl o ye e i s i nf o r m e d o f

t he
a d v e r s e e m p l o y m e n td e c is io n . D e law areSt at eCol legev. R i c ks , 449 U

. S. 250, 261 (1980 )

. T h e d ate w h en the em pl oyee receives noti ce of t erm i n ati on , an d n ot t he f i naldat e of

em pl o ym e nt , i s t he da t e f r o m w hi c h t he l i m i t at i o n pe r i o d b e gi ns to ru n . E l l i ot t v. G r oup Me di c al & Su rg ical S erv. , 714 F

. 2d 556 , 563 ( 5th C i r. 1 9 8 3 ).Al l e n f

i l e d hi s c har ge w i t h t he E EO C o n M ay17, 2 00 6. Ac c o r di ng t o t he C ount y, he w as given not i c e o f t erm i n a ti on o n Jul y 6, 2005. Becaus e M ay 17, 20 06 , w as 3 16 da ys a f t er Ju l y 6, 2 00 5, Al l e n di d no tf i l e hi s c har ge w i t hi n t he 300

- da y l i m i t ati on peri od i f he w as given n o t i ce on Ju l y 6, 200 5. B u tA l l en contend s t h at he w as only given n ot i ce on Ju l y 27, 200 5. I f t h at w ere t h e cor rect da t e , t he n Al l e n woul d ha ve f i l e d hi s c har ge w i t hi n t he l i m i t at i o n pe r i o d. The di s t r i c tc o ur tdi d no te r ri n c o nc l udi ng t hat t he r e w as no g e nui ne i s s ue of m at er i alfac tas t o w het herA l l en w as given not i c e o f t er m i nat i on o n Jul y 6, 2 0 0 5
. T h e re c o r din c lu d e s afo r m d a te dJ u ly6 , 2 0 0 5 , in fo r m in gA lle n o f h isN o. 09- 40489

3 t e r m i nat i o n, w hi c h b e ar s Al l e n’ s s i gna t ur e . The r e c o r d al s o i nc l ude s a dif fe r e nt f o r m da t e d J ul y 27 , 2 00 5, a l s o i nf o r m i ng Al l e n o f

hi s t e r m i nat i o n, a l s o b e ar i ng A l l en’ s si gnat ure . Al l en c l ai m s t hat t he dat e o f Jul y 6 i s m er ely a t ypogr aphi c al
e r r o rw hi c h was c o r r e c t e d b y t he J ul y 27 f o r m . Butt he r ecord sh ow s tha tt he t w o dif fe r e ntno t i c e s o f

t e r m i nat i o n r e s ul t e d f rom tw o dif

fe r e nti nve s t i ga t i o ns i nt o s e pa r at e al l e ga t i o ns o f m i s c o nduc t by Al l e n. Al l e n’ s b ar e a s s e r t i o n t hatt he Ju l y 6 da t e w as a typog raph i calerror i s n oten ou gh to create a gen u i n e i ssue of
m ater i alfact
. “ S u m m ary j u dg m en ti s app ropri ate w h ere crit i cal evi den ce i s s o
w e a k o rte n u o u s o n a ne s s e n tia l fa c t t h a t itco u ldn o t s u p p o r ta j u d g m e n tin favor of t h e n o n m o v a n t, or w h ere iti s s o overw h el m i n g t h at itm an da t es j u d gm en t i n fav or of th e m ov a n t. ” Arm s t r o ng v . Ci tyof D al las , 997 F. 2d 62, 67 (5 th C ir. 1 9 9 3 ). T h e j u d g me n to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.