alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 38693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of Intent To Terminate 
Receivership

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC or Receiver) as Receiver for the institution listed 
below intends to terminate its receivership for said institution.

                                   Notice of Intent To Terminate Receivership
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Date of
               Fund                   Receivership name            City               State       appointment of
                                                                                                     receiver
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10407.............................  Decatur First Bank...  Decatur.............  GA                   10/21/2011
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The liquidation of the assets for the receivership has been 
completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance 
with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to 
proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing, 
identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and sent 
within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, 
Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, 
Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on August 2, 2018.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16833 Filed 8-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Fourth Quarter:  2004 and 2005
         (in percent)
                                    90-percent
                   Fourth   Fourth  confidence   90-percent confidence
Age of householder Quarter  Quarter interval(&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>   interval (&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>
                    2004     2005   of 2005 rate   of difference

United States.....    69.2     69.0      0.5           0.4

    Under 25 years    25.9     24.8      1.5           1.4
    25 to 29 years    40.1     41.6      1.5           1.4
    30 to 34 years    58.0     57.1      1.4           1.3
    35 to 39 years    67.0     67.4      1.3           1.2
    40 to 44 years    72.7     71.8      1.2           1.1
    45 to 49 years    76.0     75.1      1.1           1.2
    50 to 54 years    78.9     78.5      1.1           1.2
    55 to 59 years    81.2     80.0      0.8           0.9
    60 to 64 years    82.0     81.6      0.9           1.0
    65 to 69 years    82.9     82.8      1.4           1.2
    70 to 74 years    83.3     82.7      1.5           1.3
    75 years and over 78.0     78.5      1.1           1.0

    Under 35 years    43.3     43.1      0.9           0.8
    35 to 44 years    70.0     69.7      0.9           0.8
    45 to 54 years    77.4     76.7      0.8           0.8
    55 to 64 years    81.6     80.6      0.6           0.6
    65 years and over 80.5     80.6      0.8           0.7


aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliablilty.  The larger 
the confidence interval is, in relation to the size of the estimate, the less reliable the estimate.
Financial Service Division Sale Completion Incentive Program American General Finance  The mechanics of the program will be as follows:  Award Amount Each participants total Sale Completion Award will be equivalent to the annual salary rate at which the employee is being paid as of the date of the sale agreement is signed.  Award Installments Two installment are proposed.  The first installment will be equal to 30% of the total award amount and the second installment equal to 70% of the total award amount.  Each participant will receive their first installment at the time that the sale is closed, provided that the participant is in active status and the performance objectives outlined below have been met.  This first installment shall be the responsibility of AGF.  The final installment, remain 70% of the total award, will be paid to active participants six months following the close of the sale.  The expense of the first installment will be incurred by AGF while the second installment shall be that of the Buyer.  Performance Objectives AIG deems the following business objectives to be critical to maintaining the present value of the AGF enterprise. 1. Contribute to the due diligence process and effectively manage transition through close. 2. Maintain an average monthly origination volume $200 million. 3. Achieve targeted net change-offs of $787 million by the end of 2010.  The Buyer may identify accomplishments in conjunction with the payout of the final installments to ensure a smooth transition process.  Participant Details See attached for an individualized listing of the recommended program participants and their current compensation details.  In summary:  No. Participants Total Awards Installment I Total    Installment II Total*  9 $2,518,250 $605,475 $1,412,775  *Excludes R. Geissinger installments, pending discussion with the Office of the Special Master.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: List of Gear by Fisheries and Fishery Management Council.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0346.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved 
information collection).
    Number of Respondents: 6.
    Average Hours per Response: 90 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 15 hours.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for an extension of a currently 
approved information collection.
    Under the provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery and 
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) [16 U.S.C. 1801 
et seq.], as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act [Pub. L. 104-
297], the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) is required to publish a 
list of all fisheries under authority of each Regional Fishery 
Management Council (Council) and all such fishing gear used in such 
fisheries (see section 305(a) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act). The list 
has been published and appears in 50 CFR part 600.725(v). Any person 
wishing to use gear not on the list, or engage in a fishery not on the 
list, must provide the appropriate Council or the Secretary, in the 
case of Atlantic highly migratory species, with 90 days of advance 
notice. If the Secretary takes no action to prohibit such a fishery or 
use of such a gear, the person may proceed.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#511e1803100e0224333c382222383e3f113e3c337f343e217f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9f6f0ebf8e6eaccdbd4d0cacad0d6d7f9d6d4db97dcd6c997ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: August 3, 2018.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-16932 Filed 8-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2011359EN.01000402.xml

| 9.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6136 — JCI/Automotive business of Keiper Recaro Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 359/04

On 16 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6136. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6136. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### John Tennie SAPP v. STATE.

No. 36611.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 201 So.2d 268.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0621

_____________________________

STEFAN PHILLIP GISLASON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

June 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, ROWE, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jason Cromey of Cromey Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# C_2012281EN.01000201.xml

| 18.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 September 2012

2012/C 281/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3086 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 102,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4552 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80695 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6243 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2160 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4725 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,505 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1034 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4885 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3542 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2452 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2733 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1444 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5786 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6020 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 462,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,8353 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2745 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4005 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 388,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9853 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,401 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,1550 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,318 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6411 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7236 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,7360 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3086

JPY

Japanese yen

102,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4552

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80695

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6243

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2160

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4725

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,505

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1034

RON

Romanian leu

4,4885

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3542

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2452

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2733

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1444

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5786

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6020

KRW

South Korean won

1 462,17

ZAR

South African rand

10,8353

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2745

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4005

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 388,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9853

PHP

Philippine peso

54,401

RUB

Russian rouble

40,1550

THB

Thai baht

40,318

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6411

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7236

INR

Indian rupee

70,7360

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012339EN.01000802.xml

| 7.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6706 — SK Innovation Co./Continental AG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 339/06

On 30 October 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6706. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6706. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Business Ownership Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.23 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, MAY 2, 2012 2010 Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS) This Census Bureau brief highlights the most recent update to the Business Dynamics Statistics, which found that U.S. business startups have been declining since the 1980s and especially during the 2008-2009 recession. The report concludes that the U.S. has become less entrepreneurial as a result of the decline in startups and the lack of activity by young businesses. The BDS, which provides annual statistics from 1976 to 2010 by firm age and size, is crucial to understanding current and historical U.S. entrepreneurial activity. The BDS results from collaboration between the U.S. Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, the largest American nonprofit organization that focuses on entrepreneurship. Internet address: <http://www.kauffman.org/bds2012>. Further information on the BDS release can be found at <https://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/data.html>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Ben WHITEHOUSE, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. LEASING ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1118.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 7, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Earnest P. RICHARDSON v. STATE.

No. 36251.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
#### Marwell Jon SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43897.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### Eugene JORDAN, Petitioner, v. FOOD FAIR STORES, INC. and the Florida Industrial Relations Commission, an Administrative Agency, Respondents.

No. 43502.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 3, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J„ and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
# C_2013018EN.01000101.xml

| 22.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6709 — Alpha Group Investments/Janoland Properties/NEU Property Holdings/Liberty Mall)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 18/01

On 14 January 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6709. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6709. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Leo J. PILON and Doris M. Pilon, his wife, Appellants, v. John W. FAULKNER, Appellee.

No. 1344.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 8, 1967.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Charles Eugene WELLS, alias Pete Wells v. STATE.

6 Div. 405.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 15, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1974.

AFTER REMANDMENT

In accordance with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama in this case, we have made a determination as to whether the error furnishing the basis for the judgment probably injuriously affected substantial rights of appellant-defendant. After an examination and review of the entire record, we are of the opinion that it does not appear that said error probably injuriously affected substantial rights of the appellant-defendant. In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 45, Title 7, Appendix, Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled 1958, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Judges concur except CATES, P. J., not sitting.
#### CURTISS NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI SPRINGS v. Jimmy JAMES.

No. 38571.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 221 So.2d 806.