alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013021EN.01001101.xml

| 24.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/11

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2013/C 21/05

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Luxembourg

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Luxembourg

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Luxembourg

Subject of commemoration: the wedding of the Heir Grand-Duke Guillaume with the Countess Stéphanie de Lannoy

Description of the design: The coin depicts, on the left of its inner part, the effigy of His Royal Highness, the Grand-Duke Henri, and on the right of its inner part, the effigy of the Heir Grand-Duke Guillaume superimposed on the effigy of the Countess Stéphanie. The texts ‘PRËNZENHOCHZAÏT’ and ‘LËTZEBUERG’ and the year ‘2012’, flanked by the mint mark and the initials of the mint master, appear at the bottom of the inner part of the coin.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 1,4 million

Date of issue: December 2012

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
#### Joe Franklin, Plaintiff, *v.*Associated Musicians of Greater New York, Local 802, A. F. of M., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 23, 1953.

*Kevie Franklin*and *Samuel M. Bivelson*for plaintiff.

*Vladeck & Elias*for defendants.

Steuer, J.

In this action for an injunction plaintiff moves for a temporary injunction and defendant cross-moves to dismiss the complaint. The material facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff is in the business of putting on various types of entertainment. On New Year’s Eve he staged a vaudeville show at Carnegie Hall. One of the performers who was consulted *522in regard to appearing was one Rogers. He did not appear. Thereafter a dispute arose between Rogers and plaintiff as to this entertainment — Rogers claiming that plaintiff had contracted to pay him for this show and plaintiff denying that any contract had been made. Rogers notified defendant union of which he is a member, and defendant notified plaintiff to appear before a trial board of the union to determine the merits of Rogers’ claim. Plaintiff appeared and the trial board found that Rogers was entitled to $250 from plaintiff. Plaintiff refused to pay whereupon defendant placed plaintiff’s name on its *“*unfair list.” This latter is a sheet which defendant circulates among its members. It consists of a list of names with the words *‘'*Unfair List ’ ’ at the head and is generally understood among the trade to indicate persons who have been guilty of improper practices in their relations with union members so that these latter and others may be advised of the character of the persons named in it. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the circulation of his name on the list.

Defendant’s first contention, that this is a labor dispute and hence not subject to injunction without proof of compliance with the relevant provisions of law (Civ. Prac. Act, § 876-a) is unsound *(Exchange Bakery*v. *Rifkin,*245 N. Y. 260). Their second contention is that they have a right to do what, they are doing — that is publicize their grievance and seek support. The answer is that they have such right if their grievance is lawful but not if it isn’t *(Rochette & Parzini Corp.*v. *Campo,*301 N. Y. 228). The object here is to compel plaintiff to abide by defendant’s decision in a dispute in which one of its own members is a party. There is no contention that plaintiff consented to the union’s trial board as an arbiter. Just how defendant claims to acquire the right to adjudicate an issue of whether or not a contract exists between its members and a third party is not clear but the justification is more cynical than legal. The claim is that the people defendant’s members deal with are so insubstantial that resort to the regularly constituted tribunals is ineffective. To seek to compel a resort to a self-constituted tribunal is not a lawful purpose and the situation is not improved any by the fact that the membership of the tribunal in relation to the matters coming before it would not meet any known standard of disinterestedness.

Motion for injunction granted. Motion to dismiss complaint denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      26,210,584
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            70,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                372,813,416
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   1,070,519,319
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     1,072,355,198
<LOANS>                                     65,232,102
<ALLOWANCE>                                    100,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,714,765,035
<DEPOSITS>                               1,036,821,622
<SHORT-TERM>                               516,321,235
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         17,649,656
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       24,196,485
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       145,040
<OTHER-SE>                                 119,630,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,714,765,035
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                789,029
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           19,421,039
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            20,210,068
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,337,263
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,059,711
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,150,357
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             30,926,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,856,614
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   7,856,614
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,637,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.99
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               100,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              100,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           100,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONI, E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of CrownCrafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ending April 1, 2007 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: June 20, 2007       /s/ E. Randall Chestnut E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board,
\<PAGE>

                                  UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                              WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
                               September 13, 2000


                              VIRGINIA GAS COMPANY
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         Delaware                       000-21523               87-0443823
(State or other jurisdiction of  (Commission File Number)    (I.R.S. Employer
         incorporation)                                   Identification Number)


         200 East Main Street                                         24210
         Abingdon, Virginia                                         (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)


                                 (540) 676-2380
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)




<PAGE>



Item 5. Other Events

        See Exhibit 99.1

Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits


         99.1     September 20, 2000 Press Release



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized



                                         VIRGINIA GAS COMPANY


                                         ------------------------
                                               (Registrant)


Date: September 21, 2000                 By:      /s/ William L. Clear
                                              -------------------------
                                         William L. Clear
                                         Vice President and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of CFC
International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis W. Lakomy, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2005 |  | /s/ Dennis W. Lakomy                                
|                     |  | Dennis W. Lakomy                                    
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided by CFC International, Inc., and will be retained by CFC International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



32
Filed 3/15/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 47

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Carlos Mendez Jr., Defendant and Appellant

No. 20110273

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jacob T. Rodenbiker, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.  Submitted on brief.

Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.  Submitted on brief.

State v. Mendez

No. 20110273

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Carlos Mendez Jr. appealed from a district court criminal judgment entered after the district court revoked his probation.  On appeal, Mendez argues there is insufficient evidence to support the revocation of his probation.  Specifically, Mendez asserts the district court did not take judicial notice of his two criminal convictions, and the allegation that he violated the terms of his probation by using alcohol was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner
〇.〇〇〇の 〇.〇〇〇N ○占○昭一 

tOuOm00N.}0」山ト』 

〇.〇〇〇寸 

〇.〇寸 〇.〇N 

〇.〇∞ 

〇.〇u
1 The Honorable D. Brook Bartlett, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3044

___________ Sherri P. Gibson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 2, 1999 Filed: March 5, 1999

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Sherri P. Gibson appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing as untimely her complaint seeking review of the Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny her applicationfor supplemental security income. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an opinion-2-

wouldlack precedential value. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Third Quarter 2000 and 1999



                                    Rental vacancy rates


                              Third        Third       Standard     Standard
Area                         quarter      quarter      error on     error on
                               2000         1999       2000 rate   difference

 
United States..........         8.2          8.2          0.2          0.3

  Inside MAs...........         8.0          7.8          0.2          0.3
    In central cities..         8.5          8.6          0.3          0.4
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         7.5          6.8          0.3          0.4
  Outside MAs..........         9.1         10.8          0.5          0.8

 Northeast.............         5.8          6.3          0.4          0.6
 Midwest...............         9.6          8.9          0.5          0.7
 South.................        10.6         10.4          0.4          0.5
 West..................         5.7          6.3          0.3          0.5



                                    Homeowner vacancy rates


                                Third        Third      Standard     Standard
Area                           quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                                2000         1999       2000 rate   difference


United States..........         1.6          1.6          0.1          0.1

  Inside MAs...........         1.4          1.4          0.1          0.1
    In central cities..         1.8          1.7          0.1          0.2
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         1.2          1.3          0.1          0.1
  Outside MAs..........         2.4          2.2          0.1          0.2

 Northeast.............         1.2          1.4          0.1          0.2
 Midwest...............         1.3          1.3          0.1          0.2
 South.................         2.0          1.8          0.1          0.1
 West..................         1.5          1.7          0.1          0.2
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 1(5)(d)

                FIRST ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                         GUARANTEED DEATH BENEFIT RIDER

This endorsement is a part of the contract if it is attached to it and shown in
the Specifications Page.

REQUIRED GUARANTEED DEATH BENEFIT PAYMENT - This endorsement will take effect
upon receipt by the Company of the Guaranteed Death Benefit payment shown on
Specifications Page.

GUARANTEED DEATH BENEFIT - The contract will not lapse while this endorsement is
in force. The monthly deduction will be made from the Contract Value, if any,
until the Final Payment Date.

NET DEATH BENEFIT - While this endorsement is in force, the death benefit
provision of the contact is amended by the addition of the following:

If this endorsement is in effect on the Final Payment Date, a death benefit will
be provided thereafter unless the endorsement terminates. The net death benefit
will be the Face amount as of the Final Payment Date or the Contract Value as of
the date due proof of death is received by the company, whichever is greater,
reduced by Outstanding Loan through the contract month in which the Insured
dies. The monthly deduction will not be deducted after the Final Payment Date.

Termination - This endorsement will terminate and may not be reinstated on the
first to occur of the following:

foreclosure for Outstanding Loan; or
a request is made for a partial withdrawal or preferred loan after the Final
Payment Date; or upon your request.

It is possible that the surrender value will not be sufficient to keep the
contract in force on the first Monthly Processing Date following the date this
endorsement terminates. The net amount payable to keep the contract in force
will never exceed the surrender charge plus the amount required to pay the
monthly deductions for three months as of the day the grace period began.

                   SIGNED FOR THE COMPANY AT DOVER, DELAWARE.
#### Maria POLAND and Julia P. Poland, Appellants, v. Iris P. RICH, Appellee.

No. 2525.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21


                           DDL ELECTRONICS, INC.
                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


All subsidiaries are 100% owned by DDL Electronics, Inc., except as 
otherwise indicated, and are included in the consolidated financial 
statements.  Each subsidiary was organized in the jurisdiction specified 
under its name in the following list.


Aeroscientific Corp. (California) 
(99.9%-owned by DDL Electronics, Inc.)                     
California

Aeroscientific Corp. (Oregon)
(100%-owned by Aeroscientific Corp.(California))           
Oregon

A.J. Electronics, Inc.                                      
California

DDL Europe Limited                                          
Northern Ireland

DDL Electronics Limited 
(100%-owned by DDL Europe Limited)                         
Northern Ireland

Irlandus Circuits Limited 
(100% owned by DDL Europe Limited)                         
Northern Ireland

SMTEK, Inc.
California
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.89 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, DEC. 6, 2012 "Annual Energy Outlook:" Live on the "America by the Numbers" Segment of C-SPAN "Washington Journal" **CHANGES IN BOLD**  Is the U.S. growth in energy production outstripping consumption? Find out more on Friday, Dec. 7, 2012, from approximately **9:15 a.m.** to 10 a.m. EST as Adam Sieminski, Administrator of the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), **discusses the long-term outlook for U.S. energy production and consumption out to 2040**. Each Friday, C-SPAN's "America by the Numbers" segment on its "Washington Journal" show features information from the federal statistical system. The program highlights trends and allows the public to call in or email their views. More information on previous C-SPAN programs is available at <https://www.census.gov/newsroom/cspan.html>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Joseph LEE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 22, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court, for Palm Beach County; James C. Downey, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2012195EN.01000202.xml

| 3.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6583 — KIB/BDMI/Bidmanagement)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 195/04

On 19 June 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6583. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6583. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---