alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                      27,536,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              258,771,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,324,940
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             326,772,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    275,510,953
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,567
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,119,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               326,772,692
<SALES>                                     22,591,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,591,054
<CGS>                                       10,170,739
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,170,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,003,256
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             4,308,450
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,914,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                   698,919
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            999,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   999,560
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18


</TABLE>
# C_2012203EN.01001301.xml

| 11.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/13

---

Corrigendum to Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6672 — HHR Euro C.V./Starwood/Le Meridien Nuremberg) — Candidate case for simplified procedure

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 202 of 10 July 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 202 of 10 July 2012

2012/C 203/08

On page 9, in point 4, second paragraph:

for:

‘Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication.’,

read:

‘Observations must reach the Commission not later than 5 days following the date of this publication.’.

---
# C_2012210EN.01001001.xml

| 17.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 July 2012

2012/C 210/08

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2177 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 96,25 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4397 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6185 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4525 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,388 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 288,15 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1844 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5650 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2115 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,1934 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2367 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4456 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5338 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5426 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 398,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0722 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7687 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4840 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 530,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8727 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,968 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,7916 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,530 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4851 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2379 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,3700 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2177

JPY

Japanese yen

96,25

DKK

Danish krone

7,4397

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78440

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6185

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4525

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,388

HUF

Hungarian forint

288,15

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1844

RON

Romanian leu

4,5650

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2115

AUD

Australian dollar

1,1934

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2367

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4456

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5338

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5426

KRW

South Korean won

1 398,88

ZAR

South African rand

10,0722

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7687

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4840

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 530,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8727

PHP

Philippine peso

50,968

RUB

Russian rouble

39,7916

THB

Thai baht

38,530

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4851

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2379

INR

Indian rupee

67,3700

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012390EN.01000302.xml

| 18.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6760 — Clariant/Wilmar/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 390/06

On 13 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6760. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6760. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 8, 2011 

p0228 

Order 

 

March 8, 2011 

142054 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142054 

 COA: 299572 

Ionia CC: 2009-014277-FH 

MICHAEL LEE DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Parking Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Emanuel Eads, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                                /s/ EMANUEL EADS
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Emanuel Eads
                                           Chief Executive Officer

 A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CENTRAL PARKING
CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF
UPON REQUEST.

 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing. This certification is executed as of August 9, 2005.
#### LOUISVILLE CHAIR COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JULIAN FURNITURE COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11778.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Feb. 29, 1972.

Eugene J. Coen, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

Robert E. Eatman, Henley A. Hunter, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before AYRES, BOLIN and HALL, JJ. •

BOLIN, Judge.

Louisville Chair Company, Inc., sued Julian Furniture Company, Inc., in the City Court of Shreveport for $285.90, allegedly due on open account for furniture sold by plaintiff to defendant. For oral reasons judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff as prayed for and defendant appeals. We affirm the judgment of the lower court.

The issue on appeal is whether Eugene J. Coen, Jr., manager of defendant corporation, had the authority to bind defendant corporation of which his father, Eugene J. Coen, was president.

The testimony was not transcribed but in lieu thereof a stipulation of facts was filed, together with a deposition of Eugene J. Coen, Jr. From these documents we find the facts to be:

Eugene J. Coen, Jr., was the manager and sole employee of Julian Furniture Company which company was engaged in the repair and occasional sale of used furniture. In the conduct of its business the corporation maintained a large warehouse for storage and repair of furniture principally used in furnishing residential rent property owned by Coen, Sr. Coen, Jr., also ran a sewing machine business on the premises of the furniture company. The merchandise involved in this suit was purchased new, which was apparently the first time any new furniture had been bought by defendant corporation. Coen, Sr., testified his son had no authority to bind the corporation. He further testified he had no knowledge of the indebtedness until he was served with citation in this suit.

Coen, Jr., also testified he had no authority to bind the corporation. However, in *429his deposition, taken prior to trial and introduced for the purpose of impeachment, he stated he had the general authority to operate defendant corporation. He further testified he ordered the furniture, the unpaid price of which is the basis of this suit, believing he had authority to buy the furniture. He admitted his father at a later date admonished him about making the purchase.

From our view of the limited evidence in the case, we conclude Coen, Jr., as general manager of defendant corporation, was clothed with the implied authority to bind Julian Furniture Company, Inc., for the purchase price of the merchandise made the basis of this suit. Coen, Sr., as president of defendant corporation, having clothed his son with general authority to manage the corporation, cannot retroactively withdraw his agent’s authority to bind the corporation in the operation of its usual course of business.

For the reasons assigned the judgment of the lower court is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
#### A. J. FOSTER v. COUNTY OF ERIE.

APPEAL BY PLAINTIFF FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ERIE COUNTY.

Argued April 27, 1891

Decided May 18, 1891.

City recorders, under § 2, act of March 24, 1877, P. L. 48, having like jurisdiction with justices of the peace, subject to a like right of appeal and certiorari, a civil action before a recorder is within the provisions of § 22, act of March 20, 1810, 5 Sm. L. 171, and the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas in certiorari thereon is final.*

Before Paxson, O. J., Green, Clark, Williams, Mc-Collum and Mitchell, JJ.

No. 332 January Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 163 February Term 1889, C. P.

On January 22,1889, a certiorari issued from the court below to Mr. Selden Marvin, city recorder of the city of Erie, directing the return of the record in an action by A. J. Foster against the county of Erie.

*408The record returned showed that on December 20, 1888, A. J. Foster had brought suit before the city recorder against the county of Erie, to recover the sum of $4, for two days’ service on November 27, 28, 1888, as a member of a coroner’s jury; and that on January 5,1889, the recorder had entered judgment for plaintiff for $4 and costs.

Exceptions filed by the defendant having been argued, the court, Gunnison, P. J., on June 24, 1889, entered a judgment reversing the judgment of the recorder. Thereupon, the plaintiff took this appeal, assigning the judgment of reversal for error.

*Mr. J. Ross*Thompson, for the appellant.

*Mr. T>. A. Sawdey,*for the appellee.

*

 See Mahanoy City Bor. v. Wadlinger, ante 308.

Per Curiam:

We are of opinion that the judgment of the court below was final, under the twenty-second section of the act of March 20, 1810. It is true the suit was brought before the recorder of the city of Erie, but the act of March 24, 1877, P. L. 47, defining the duties of recorders of cities, provides, inter alia, that they “shall have and exercise like civil and criminal jurisdiction as justices of the peace of this commonwealth have and exercise, and shall be entitled to like fees, with a like right of appeal or certiorari by the parties aggrieved, from any judgment of said recorder to the Court of Common Pleas of the county in which said city is situate.”

Appeal quashed.
# C_2013112EN.01000601.xml

| 19.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/6

---

Special Report No 23/2012 ‘Have EU Structural Measures successfully supported the regeneration of industrial and military brownfield sites?’

2013/C 112/03

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 23/2012 ‘Have EU Structural Measures successfully supported the regeneration of industrial and military brownfield sites?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
II 

Calendar No. 211 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1569 

To ensure the complete and timely payment of the obligations of the United 

States Government until December 31, 2014. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 8, 2013 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read the first time 

OCTOBER 9, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To ensure the complete and timely payment of the obligations 

of the United States Government until December 31, 2014. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Default Prevention Act 

5 of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1569 PCS

1 SEC. 2. ENSURING TIMELY PAYMENT. 

2 Section 2 of the No Budget, No Pay Act of 2013 

3 (31 U.S.C. 3101 note) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘date of the enactment of this 

5 Act’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘date of 

6 enactment of the Default Prevention Act of 2013’’; 

7 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘May 18, 

8 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’; and 

9 (3) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘May 19, 

10 2013’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘January 

11 1, 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 211 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1569 

A BILL 

To ensure the complete and timely payment of the 

until December 31, 2014. obligations of the United States Government 

OCTOBER 9, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17250]



[[Page 40106]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83784; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2017-006]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, 
To List and Trade Shares of Twelve Monthly Series of the Cboe Vest S&P 
500 Enhanced Growth Strategy ETF Under the ETF Series Solutions Trust 
Under Rule 14.11(c)(3), Index Fund Shares

August 7, 2018.
    On November 21, 2017, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') 
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and 
trade, under BZX Rule 14.11(c)(3), shares of twelve monthly series of 
the Cboe Vest S&P 500[supreg] Enhanced Growth Strategy ETF under the 
ETF Series Solutions Trust. The proposed rule change was published for 
comment in the Federal Register on December 11, 2017.\3\ On January 22, 
2018, the Commission extended the time period within which to approve 
the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or 
institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the 
proposed rule change to March 11, 2018.\4\ On March 9, 2018, the 
Commission instituted proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 
\5\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule 
change.\6\ On April 13, 2018, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the 
proposed rule change.\7\ On June 6, 2018, the Commission designated a 
longer period for Commission action on the proposed rule change.\8\ The 
Commission received no comments on the proposed rule change. On July 
31, 2018, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82216 (December 5, 
2017), 82 FR 58235.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82552, 83 FR 3819 
(January 26, 2018).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82843, 83 FR 11264 
(March 14, 2018).
    \7\ Amendment No. 1, which amended and replaced the proposed 
rule change in its entirety, is available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2017-006/cboebzx2017006-3458512-162202.pdf.
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83388, 83 FR 27356 
(June 12, 2018).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17250 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 00208

- CR

DEVANTE DAMON DARDEN, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 45315

- B

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 O R D E R Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitiv e data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar gover nment

- issued personal identification number.”
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(1). Volume six of the reporter’s record includes a social security number. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because volume six of the reporter’s record co ntains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed volume six of the reporter’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: October 29, 2018
JOHf.r-; YiSAKSO M l-.l!i. - ••.\-;;-;, . D C 2'y : ^i -

^H: ^Br.-'.itE-'^AK'P , S;.-(T! ^ 97 ! ..•.NT.^ . G A,W53 9 

# State s ;6cnatc tULt u ;:»* ; Vi?ASHIi\iGTON , O

C 20b l Augus t 26 , 201 0 Ms . Heide hShahmorad i Actin g Deput y Assistan t Secretan ' for

Govtimincnta l Ai'hur s U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y A%-enuc , S E Wasliington , D C 2059 0 Dea f Ms . Shahmoradi : 

### XI-100915-00 4

COMMEKOE , SCI£fJC t A;>iO TRANSPORTATiO N HEALTH , EDUCATSOr^i , LABOR , AN D PENSION S .^i.i:'C.:;>WMrrrt:;- : o' - rji^ETv , RA:;KIM G MrV^^Sf l VETERANS ' AFFAIR S SELEC TCQMMfTTE E O N ETHIC S Vicr - OiAtPtVAf j SMAL L BUSINES S Atg D ENTREPflENeOBSHf P

Ia mwjitin g i nsuppor t o f th e Savanna hAirjiorf

CoiTunission' s applicatio nfo r th e Smal l Community ' ^Ai

i Servic e Developmen t

Progra mGran t

administere db y th e U.S . Dcpatmicn t

o f Transportation . Fundin g fro mthi s gran t i s particularl y importan t t o Savannah/Hilto nHea d Internationa l ;\irpor t

b y atttactin g affordabl e ai r servic e t o di e communitj- . Thes e trave l need s simpl y ar e no t

bein g me t

today , Tli e presenc e o f alow-far e carrie r

a t th e Airpor t woul dpla y amajo r

rol e i nsatisfyin g di e need s o f th e communit y an dbenefi t bot hGeorgi a an dSout hCarolina . I nrespec t

fo r you r policie s an dprocedures , Treques t dia t yo u giv e th e Savanna h Airpor t Cormnissdo nyou r

ful l consideratio nfo r

thi s grant . Iwoul dappreciat e yo u keepin g u s informe do f

tlii s applicatio nan dan y award s mad e imde r thi s fundin g ride. If

yo u hav e an y questions , pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contac t

my gran t

director , Kat y McEve r a t ("/TO ) 661-0999 . Than k yo u i nadvanc e fo r

you r consideration . Sincerel y yours ,

tso n .'nite dStite s Senat e

JHI/ke m