alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket Management Facility

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. West Building Ground Floor, Room W12 - 140 Dear Sir or Madam: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation requests an exemption to 1 4 CFR 61.57(e)(3) for night currency requirements to include type- rated aircraft, operated by a two - pilot crew . The primary contact for this petition is: James Wayne Chief Pilot/Safety Officer Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Office (310) 332 -0151, mobile (310) 200-3354 Email: james.wayne@ngc.com **Basis in Regulation** 14 CFR 61.57(b) requires night currency for pilot s- in - command of aircraft carrying passengers at night requiring at least 3 takeoffs and landings at night in the past 90 days in that category and class; and type, if the aircraft requires a type rating. 14 CFR 61.57(c)(3) provides exceptions to 14 CFR 61.57(b) only for the pilot- in - command of turbine- powered airplan e that are type certificated for more than one pilot crewmember. **Extent of Relief Requested** 14 CFR 61.57(c) (3) provides exceptions to a pilot of a type rated aircraft, that requires two pilot s by certification . Northrop Grumman requests approval to use the exceptions provided in 61.57(c)(3) in a type rated aircraft, that uses two - pilot s by operation al standards . **Reason for Seeking Relief** Only a few aircraft types are certificated requiring only one pilot . Northrop Grumman’s training and operating program uses a two person crew at all times, but is not afforded relief under this exception. We believe that our operating standards meet the intent of the rule. **Supporting Documentation and Public Benefit**  Northrop Grumman operates two BE - 1900 aircraft, a type - rated aircraft requiring one pilot crewmember by certification. Northrop’s operating standards require that all company aircraft are operated with two - pilot crews, including the BE - 1900, at all times . All Northrop corporate pilots complete annual recurrent aircraft training under a Part 142 simulator training programat Flight Safety International using only two - pilot crews . Northrop’s BE - 1900 aircraft are based

in southern California and the nearest B E- 1900 simulator is located in Seattle, Washington ; thus making the use of a simulator for night currency every 90 days impractical. The only other option is to use the actual aircraft for accomplishing the night takeoff and landings every 90 days which is not only an economic burden , but further overloads the already congested airspace in the Los Angeles area. **Safety Standards** Type - rated aircraft operated by a two - pilot crew are an obvious improvement in the level of safety over single pilot operations. Aircraft that already benefit from the exceptions in 14 CFR 61.57(c)(3) require two - pilot crews. R equiring two - pilot crews by company operational standards instead of by aircraft certification provides an equivalent level of safety . Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, James Wayne Chief Pilot/ Safety Officer Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
#### In re ESTATE of Abraham BROWN, Deceased.

No. 72-699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 31, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[4910-I3-Pj

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAnON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

Airworthiness Directives; RAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model SAe 146 and "1~S\"lIOl

r

(Docket No. FAA-2009-0912; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-047-AD; Amendmen

- ~

39-*****; AD  -** -**j

RIN 2120-AA64

Avro 146-RJ Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportatioll

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

~1Tw.s

<.0 ••

--' /l- t.

om

I 1'1/ = R<II,ITfN(i S"MIlOI

1'/>-(

,~

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list .

ROliI1N"SYMIUll

above. This AD resulis from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeA!)

originated by an aviation authority of another country to ideoli fy and con-eel an unsafe

condition on an aVIation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

Reports have been received of finding corrosion at the Frame 29 wing-tofuselage attachment lug plate joint. This condition, if not detected and

corrected, could result in a degradation of the structural integrity ofFramc

29 and the wing-to-fuselage attachment.

.'AI'li

* * * * * *

The unsafe condition is degradation of the structural integrity of Frame 29 and the win

to-fuselage attachment, which could result in loss of control of the airplane. We arc

issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

l'llNGSH'8D'

>AU
I, Tad M. Ballantyne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Mach One Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of Mach One Corporation.

| Date:      November 23, 2009 | By:                                                                                                    | /s/      Tad M. Ballantyne |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                         |           Tad      M. Ballantyne , Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

| Date:      November 23, 2009 | By:                                                                                                           | /s/      Patrick G. Sheridan |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                         |            Patrick      G. Sheridan, Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Paul J.B, Murphy, III, as Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)        the Quarterly Report ofthe Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)        the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 9, 2007 | By: /s/ PAUL J. B. MURPHY, III |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                    | Paul J. B. Murphy, III         |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer        |
|                    | Principal Executive Officer    |

 

----
# C_2013081EN.01001201.xml

| 20.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 March 2013

2013/C 81/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2944 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4555 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85585 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3421 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2218 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5205 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,647 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7015 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1548 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4060 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3509 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2475 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3265 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0455 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5712 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6179 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 440,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,9332 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0457 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5887 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 580,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0409 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,675 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9325 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,900 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5637 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0453 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,3830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2944

JPY

Japanese yen

123,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4555

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85585

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3421

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2218

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5205

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,647

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7015

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1548

RON

Romanian leu

4,4060

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3509

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2475

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3265

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0455

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5712

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6179

KRW

South Korean won

1 440,51

ZAR

South African rand

11,9332

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0457

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5887

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 580,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0409

PHP

Philippine peso

52,675

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9325

THB

Thai baht

37,900

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5637

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0453

INR

Indian rupee

70,3830

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012368EN.01000902.xml

| 28.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6564 — ARM/Giesecke & Devrient/Gemalto/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 368/04

On 6 November 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6564. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6564. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             281
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      199
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   544
<PP&E>                                           1,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              460
<BONDS>                                            271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,399
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,128)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       977
<SALES>                                            455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   455
<CGS>                                              116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (21)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (214)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (214)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (214)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.6

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                         ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP.


          ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP., a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies
that the amendment set forth below to the Corporation's Certificate of
Incorporation was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware:
          Paragraph (1)(a) of Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation
of Zenith National Insurance Corp. is amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

                    "FOURTH: (1)(a) The total number of shares of
                    stock which this corporation is authorized to
                    issue is fifty-one million (51,000,000). All of
                    such shares shall have a par value of One Dollar
                    ($1.00) each, and shall be divided into and
                    classified as fifty million (50,000,000) shares
                    of Common Stock and one million (1,000,000) shares
                    of Preferred Stock."

          This Certificate of Amendment shall become effective as of the close
of business on the day it is filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware in accordance with Section 103 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.
          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP. has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be signed and attested by

<PAGE>

its duly authorized officers this 22nd day of November, 1985.

                                  ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP.


                                  By: /s/ STANLEY R. ZAX
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Stanley R. Zax, President



[CORPORATE SEAL]


/s/ DONALD LIEB
-------------------------------
Donald Lieb, Secretary
#### JIM HARRELL PONTIAC, INC., Appellant, v. Louis CUETO and Nellie Cueto, Appellees.

No. 71-573.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 9, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1
       (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures, and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
    Date: May 12, 2008
    /s/ PETER J. UNGAROPeter J. UngaroChief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER   NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
                                                                  30,                            30,
                                                      ----------------------------  -----------------------------
                                                          1996           1995            1996           1995
                                                      -------------  -------------  --------------  -------------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
Net loss............................................  $  (4,825,000) $  (2,835,000) $  (12,740,000) $  (9,634,000)
                                                      -------------  -------------  --------------  -------------
                                                      -------------  -------------  --------------  -------------
Weighted average shares of Common Stock
 outstanding........................................      1,118,000        697,971       1,050,637        697,360
Shares related to staff accounting bulletin topic
 4D:
  Stock options and warrants........................        270,351        270,351         270,351        270,351
  Common Stock......................................       --              403,352          56,245        403,653
  Convertible Preferred Stock (Series C)............      3,235,579      3,235,579       3,235,579      3,235,579
Shares used in computing net loss per share.........      4,623,930      4,607,253       4,612,812      4,606,943
Net loss per share..................................  $       (1.04) $       (0.62) $        (2.76) $       (2.09)
Calculation of shares outstanding for computing pro
 forma net loss per share:
  Shares used in computing net loss per share.......      4,623,930      4,607,253       4,612,812      4,606,943
  Adjusted to reflect the effect of the assumed
    conversion of Preferred Stock from the date of
    issuance(1).....................................      4,598,080      4,598,080       4,598,080      4,544,536
Shares used in computing pro forma net loss per
 share..............................................      9,222,010      9,205,333       9,210,892      9,151,479
Pro forma net loss per share........................  $       (0.52) $       (0.31) $        (1.38) $       (1.05)
                                                      -------------  -------------  --------------  -------------
                                                      -------------  -------------  --------------  -------------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
(1) Series A and B shares
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2878 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2878

To require that stock option compensation paid to corporate executives 
     be recorded as a compensation expense in corporate financial 
                              statements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1993

  Mr. Bryant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that stock option compensation paid to corporate executives 
     be recorded as a compensation expense in corporate financial 
                              statements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Corporate Executives' Stock Option 
Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. STOCK OPTION COMPENSATION.

    Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78n) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Stock Option Compensation.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Commission shall require an issuer 
        to recognize as an expense in financial statements provided to 
        its security holders the fair value of any stock options 
        granted by such issuer to its directors, officers, senior 
        executives, or other persons in exchange for services.
            ``(2) Fair value.--For purposes of paragraph (1), the 
        Commission shall specify, by rule or regulation, the method for 
        determining the fair value of such stock options.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Not later than one hundred and twenty days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall promulgate final rules and 
regulations necessary to carry out this Act, unless the Securities and 
Exchange Commission certifies that the Financial Accounting Standards 
Board has, prior to the expiration of one hundred and twenty days after 
the date of enactment of this Act, promulgated generally accepted 
accounting principles which accomplish the purposes of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
No. 11052.

#### Garner et al. *v.*Baldwin.

Decided November 9, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Fairfield county.

*Mr. V/illiam Davidson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Henry K. Beck*and *Mr. C. W. McCleery,*for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment for. plaintiff in error.

Summers, Davis, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23




The Board of Directors
Cotton States Life Insurance Company


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 33-30696) on Form S-8 of Cotton States Life Insurance Company of our
report dated February 24, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Cotton States Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1997, and all related schedules, which report appears
in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of Cotton States Life
Insurance Company.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 30, 1998