alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bernard LIPOFSKY, Petitioner, v. AUTOMATIC MERCHANDISING, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 43055.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 6, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERWIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 29



                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C.  20549



                           FORM 11-K


        (Mark One)

     X  Annual report pursuant to Section 15 (d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (Fee Required)

        For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995   

                                OR

        Transition report pursuant to Section 15 (d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (No Fee Required)

        For the transition period from            to          

        Commission file number   1-4663 


A.     Full title of the Plan and the address of the Plan, if 
       different from that of the issuer named below:

                 CROMPTON & KNOWLES CORPORATION
                  EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

B.     Name of issuer of the securities held pursuant to the Plan 
       and the address of its principal executive office:

                 Crompton & Knowles Corporation
                One Station Place - Metro Center
                  Stamford, Connecticut  06902


                          Exhibit 29
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

Summary of Executive Compensation Notification 

Chief Financial Officer 
 Fiscal 2017
Compensation of Chief Financial Officer. 
 The Board of Directors also established and approved the fiscal 2017 annual base salary of
Mr. Wheat. The salary and other compensation approved are as set forth below in Table II. 
 Table II 

 

									
	 Name
	  	Office	  	Annual Base Salary
Fiscal 2017	 	  	Discretionary
Bonus Plan
Fiscal 2017
	 Bill W. Wheat
	  	Executive Vice
President and CFO	  	$	500,000	  	  	See Note II

 Note II: 

The Board of Directors may award discretionary bonuses to Mr. Wheat based on his performance in fiscal 2017. In addition, Mr. Wheat
may participate in two separate deferred compensation plans. The first plan allows the executive to make voluntary income deferrals. The second plan is a promise by the Company to pay benefits to the executive. If the executive is employed by the
Company on the last day of the current fiscal year (for example September 30, 2017), then the Company will establish a liability to him equal to 10% of his annual base salary as of first day of the current fiscal year (for example
October 1, 2016). This liability will accrue earnings in future years at a rate established by the administrative committee.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-3940 Directorate ID: 2015-SW-065-AD

Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-76A, S-76B, S-76C, and S-76D 

helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 198 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent loss of main rotor (M/R) or tail rotor 

(T/R) flight control and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $2,411 for a M/R pushrod assembly

$1,905 for a T/R pushrod assembly

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work hours X $85 for 

inspection)

(1.5 work hours X $85 for 

replacement)

$85

$128

Other

(Explain)

Minimal amount of time to apply the slippage 

marks for a negligible cost.

Total Cost per Helicopter $85 for the inspection

$2,539 for a M/R pushrod assembly replacement

$2,033 for a T/R pushrod assembly replacement

Total U.S. Fleet Cost $16,830 for the inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Blaine Williams
260 La. 1129

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Glen A. SONIAT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52095.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Glen A. Soniat applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The application considered in connection with the documents which are part of the record reveals that relator’s pleas of guilty were voluntarily, made with full knowledge of his rights.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that La. and U. S. law require the application be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         227,933
<SECURITIES>                                   144,054
<RECEIVABLES>                                  401,531<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,182
<INVENTORY>                                    273,785<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,132,754
<PP&E>                                         649,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                 313,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,855,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          345,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,364
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,463,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,855,437
<SALES>                                      1,517,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,517,743
<CGS>                                          811,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  811,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               622,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 85,302
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,735
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,567
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,567
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT IS NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR BAD DEBTS AND RETURNS.
<F2>AMOUNT IS NET OF OBSOLESCENCE RESERVES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8: Nos. 33-30696, 333-00795, 333-00793, 333-110738, and 033-30696) of
Cotton States Life Insurance Company of our reports dated February 13, 2004,
with respect to the 2002 and 2003 consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Cotton States Life Insurance Company included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR AEGIS REALITY, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,838,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,640,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                   330,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               845,829
<PP&E>                                     199,300,834
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,298,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             195,116,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,228,509
<BONDS>                                     61,245,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 120,494,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               195,116,467
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,154,433
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,728,520
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,389,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,036,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,036,823
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38


</TABLE>
#### The MASTAN COMPANY, Incorporated, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. BANK OF MIAMI BEACH, a hanking corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 67-54, 67-58.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 29, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeals dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39745-39746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL--9981-72-Region 6]


Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption--Class I Hazardous Waste 
Injection; Innophos, Inc. Geismar, Louisiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a UIC no migration petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that an exemption to the Land Disposal 
Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to 
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has been granted to 
Innophos for two Class I hazardous waste injection wells located at 
their Geismar, Louisiana facility. The company has adequately 
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the EPA by the petition application 
and supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree of certainty, 
there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from the injection 
zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This final decision 
allows the underground injection by Innophos of the specific restricted 
hazardous wastes identified in this exemption request, into Class I 
hazardous waste injection wells DW#1 and DW#2 until July 12, 2048, 
unless

[[Page 39746]]

the EPA moves to terminate this exemption or other petition condition 
limitations are reached. Additional conditions included in this final 
decision may be reviewed by contacting the EPA Region 6 Ground Water/
UIC Section. A public notice was issued May 24, 2018, and the public 
comment period closed on July 9, 2018, and no comments were received. 
This decision constitutes final Agency action and there is no 
Administrative appeal. This decision may be reviewed/appealed in 
compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act.

DATES: This action is effective as of July 12, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition and all pertinent information 
relating thereto are on file at the following location: Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Division, Safe Drinking Water Branch 
(6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

    Dated: July 12, 2018.
Charles W. Maguire,
Director, Water Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-17195 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
##### 



Exhibit 31(b) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED I, David E. Mangum, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CheckFree Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing equivalent functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 9, 2005 /s/ David E. MangumDavid E. MangumExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer


CheckFree Corporation
# C_2013177EN.01000101.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 June 2013

2013/C 177/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3180 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4582 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85330 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6927 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2257 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9090 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,825 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,87 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7016 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3289 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5350 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5515 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4296 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3705 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2239 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7004 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6790 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 521,52 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4906 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0832 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4905 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 088,24 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2222 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,707 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,2260 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,003 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9737 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5558 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,1200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3180

JPY

Japanese yen

128,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4582

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85330

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6927

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2257

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9090

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,825

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,87

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7016

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3289

RON

Romanian leu

4,5350

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5515

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4296

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3705

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2239

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7004

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6790

KRW

South Korean won

1 521,52

ZAR

South African rand

13,4906

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0832

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4905

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 088,24

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2222

PHP

Philippine peso

57,707

RUB

Russian rouble

43,2260

THB

Thai baht

41,003

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9737

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5558

INR

Indian rupee

78,1200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Henry DILLARD, Appellant, v. Francis WHITFIELD et al., Appellees.

No. 72-246.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
260 La. 128

#### Edward McDONALD, Individually and as Natural Tutor and Administrator of the Estate of his Minor Son, Gordon Steve McDonald v. TERREBONNE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD et al.

No. 51962.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1971.

In re: Edward McDonald applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne. 253 So.2d 558.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1984 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1984

   To enhance penalties for computer crimes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2014

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To enhance penalties for computer crimes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Credit Card Theft Sentencing Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED PENALTY.

    Section 1030 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)(A), by striking ``in section 
        1602(n) of title 15'' and inserting ``in section 103(o) of the 
        Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1602(o))''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B)(iii), by striking ``and'' 
                at the end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ``and'' after 
                the semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(D) a fine under this title, imprisonment for any term of 
        years not less than 25 or for life, or both, in the case of an 
        offense under subsection (a)(2) in which information of 
        1,000,000 or more cardholders (as defined in section 103(n) of 
        the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1602(n))) is 
        obtained;''.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.175**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office								301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)301-457-1037 (TDD)e-mail: 2000usa@census.gov						Idabelle B. Hovland301-457-8443Julia Buckley-Ess301-457-4033

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, JULY 3, 2001

## Census Bureau Releases Census  2000 Population Counts for American Samoa

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the official Census 2000 population count of 57,291 for American Samoa.

As part of Census 2000, the Census Bureau worked with the American Samoan government to collect detailed population and housing data. The count was provided to American Samoa Gov. Tauese P.F. Sunia.

American Samoa's population increased by 10,518 over the previous census in 1990. This represented a 22 percent increase in 10 years.

The Census Bureau will provide more detailed data for American Samoa in a demographic profile scheduled for release later this year and in a separate summary file and printed report, scheduled for release in February 2002 and November 2002, respectively.

 The following table shows the final census counts for small geographic areas in American Samoa:

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov