alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Promissory Note

On this date of January 22, 2010, in return for valuable consideration received, the undersigned borrower promises to pay to Seatac Digital Resources, Inc., the Lender, the sum of Fifty
Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of five percent (5%) percent per annum.

Payable On
Demand: The entire unpaid principal and accrued interest thereon, if any, shall become immediately due and payable on demand by the holder of this Note.

Default - In the event of default, the borrower agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by the Lender, including all reasonable attorney fees (including both hourly and contingent attorney
fees as permitted by law) for the collection of this Note upon default, and including reasonable collection charges (including, where consistent with industry practices, a collection charge set as a percentage of the outstanding balance of this
Note) should collection be referred to a collection agency.

Acceleration of Debt - In the event that the borrower fails to make any
payment due under the terms of this Note, or breach any condition relating to any security, security agreement, note, mortgage or lien granted as collateral security for this Note, seeks relief under the Bankruptcy Code, or suffers an involuntary
petition in bankruptcy or receivership not vacated within thirty (30) days, the entire balance of this Note and any interest accrued thereon shall be immediately due and payable to the holder of this Note.

Modification - No modification or waiver of any of the terms of this Agreement shall be allowed unless by written agreement signed by both parties.
No waiver of any breach or default hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the same or similar nature.

Transfer of the Note - The borrowers hereby waive any notice of the transfer of this Note by the Lender or by any subsequent holder of this Note, agree to remain bound by the terms of this Note subsequent to any transfer, and agree
that the terms of this Note may be fully enforced by any subsequent holder of this Note.

Severability of Provisions - In the event
that any portion of this Note is deemed unenforceable, all other provisions of this Note shall remain in full force and effect.

Choice of
Law - All terms and conditions of this Note shall be interpreted under the laws of The State of California.

Dated: January 22, 2010



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert Cambridge                   
|Americas Minority Health Network, Inc.
|Borrower
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.07 **Contact:**  Jennifer Smits
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.govKat Smith
Dallas Regional Census Center
(214) 794-7948
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, JAN. 19, 2010 Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to Biloxi, Miss. Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 
13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why "I count!" and view messages from other road tour participants.
      For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### John Henry DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-245.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 8, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradehton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and P. A. Pacyna, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Davis’ plea of guilty, entered after Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, is alleged to have been coerced. This allegation is not refuted on the face of the record and consequently Davis is entitled to an evi-dentiary hearing. See Johnson v. Wainwright, Fla.1970, 238 So.2d 590. See also State v. Reynolds, Fla.1970, 238 So.2d 598 at page 600. *Cf.*Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.

Reversed and remanded.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
# C_2011321EN.01000201.xml

| 4.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,5 % on 1 November 2011

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 November 2011

2011/C 321/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3627 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,58 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4414 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85515 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0625 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2174 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,758 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,03 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,48 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7037 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4774 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3528 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4508 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3237 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3855 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,592 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7152 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7402 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 529,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1484 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6613 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,501 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 121,45 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2525 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,289 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,14 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,162 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3945 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6867 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,154 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3627

JPY

Japanese yen

106,58

DKK

Danish krone

7,4414

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85515

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0625

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2174

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,758

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,03

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,48

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7037

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4774

RON

Romanian leu

4,3528

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4508

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3237

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3855

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,592

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7152

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7402

KRW

South Korean won

1 529,33

ZAR

South African rand

11,1484

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6613

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,501

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 121,45

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2525

PHP

Philippine peso

58,289

RUB

Russian rouble

42,14

THB

Thai baht

42,162

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3945

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6867

INR

Indian rupee

67,154

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure will hold a meeting on November 1, 2018. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at:                         *http://www.uscourts.gov/​rules-policies/​records-and-archives-rules-committees/​agenda-books.*

# DATES:

November 1, 2018

# TIME: 

9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, Mecham Conference Center, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, One Columbus Circle NE, Washington, DC 20544.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: August 6, 2018.

Rebecca A. Womeldorf,

Rules Committee Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-17091 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
#### Hector G. SUNDT, a/k/a H. G. Sundt, and Alyce M. Sundt, his wife, Appellants, v. Sandra STEDER, Appellee.

No. 71-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 25, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2890 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2890

 To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to promote recognition of 
    the human rights of people with disabilities and elimination of 
                  discrimination against such people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1993

   Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Gilman, and Mr. Fish) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to promote recognition of 
    the human rights of people with disabilities and elimination of 
                  discrimination against such people.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disability Rights in American 
Foreign Policy Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) at least 500 million people throughout the world have a 
        disability, most of whom live in developing countries;
            (2) legal and other forms of discrimination against people 
        with disabilities are pervasive worldwide;
            (3) such discrimination involves not only active exclusion, 
        but a lack of accommodations and accessibility that would allow 
        participation by people with disabilities;
            (4) discrimination against people with disabilities is a 
        violation of their human rights; and
            (5) discrimination against people with disabilities has not 
        historically been addressed by existing standards of human 
        rights employed in United States foreign policy.
    (b) Purpose.--It is the purpose of this Act to promote recognition 
of the human rights of people with disabilities and to promote the 
elimination of discrimination against such people.

SEC. 3. UNITED STATES FOREIGN POLICY.

    Section 502B(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2304(a)(1)) is amended by inserting ``disability,'' after 
``language,''.

SEC. 4. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES TO BE INCLUDED 
              IN ANNUAL HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT.

    Section 116(d) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2151n(d)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (2);
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) discrimination toward people with disabilities in 
        each foreign country which is a member of the United Nations; 
        and''.

                                 <all>
```
# CA2012215EN.01000101.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 215/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 215/1

---

CORRIGENDUM TO THE NOTICES OF COMPETITIONS

| — | EPSO/AD/233/12 — CROATIAN-LANGUAGE (HR) TRANSLATORS (AD 5) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/233/12 — CROATIAN-LANGUAGE (HR) TRANSLATORS (AD 5)

| — | EPSO/AD/234/12 — INTERPRETERS (AD 5/AD 7) FOR CROATIAN LANGUAGE (HR) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/234/12 — INTERPRETERS (AD 5/AD 7) FOR CROATIAN LANGUAGE (HR)

| — | EPSO/AD/235/12 — CROATIAN-LANGUAGE (HR) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/235/12 — CROATIAN-LANGUAGE (HR) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 180 A of 21 June 2012
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 180 A of 21 June 2012

(2012/C 215 A/01)

On pages 5, 11 and 18, at the end of Section I.2, the following text should be added:

‘Candidates should be aware that the main purpose of this competition is to guarantee the integration into the European public service of a minimum workforce in anticipation of the accession of Croatia. It is an essential guarantee that the principle of administrative continuity recognised by the jurisdictions of the Union and the efficient operation of the public service may be upheld. The intention is to commence preparatory work in view of the accession without prejudice to the ratification of the accession treaty and the regulations necessary for its effective implementation. The validity of the reserve list is therefore subject to the condition of ratification of the accession treaty by all Member States. Should the accession treaty not be ratified, or the regulations not enter into force, candidates are informed that this selection procedure may be terminated at any moment and, should the selection procedure already be completed, candidates placed on the reserve list would not derive any rights from this circumstance.’.

---
sana-ex1011_273.htm



Exhibit 10.11

 

SANA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.

2021 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

AMENDMENT

This Amendment No. 1 to the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (this “Amendment”) is made by Sana Biotechnology, Inc. (the “Company”) as of October 27, 2022 (the “Effective Date”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended, the “Plan”). 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.5 of the Plan, the Board may, in its sole discretion, amend, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time and from time to time, and shall obtain stockholder approval of any Plan amendment to the extent necessary to comply with Section 423 of the Code (or any successor rule or provision), with respect to the Section 423 Component, or any other applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule; 

WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the actions set forth in this Amendment do not require the approval of the Company’s stockholders; and

WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan as set forth in this Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the foregoing, the Plan is amended as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
Section 4.3(c) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:




 

“(c)Intentionally omitted.”


	
 
	
2.
	
Except as modified by this Amendment, all terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.

 

 

Sana Biotechnology, Inc.

 

/s/ Bernard J. Cassidy                                         

By: Bernard J. Cassidy

Its: Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
#### Bedros AZAROGLU, Appellant, v. Gladys B. JORDAN et al., Appellees.

No. 72-136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 21, 1972.

Walsh, Nottebaum & Laks and Robert R. White, Miami, for appellant.

McCune, Hiaasen, Crum, Ferris & Gardner and Davis W. Duke, Jr., Ft. Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant, Bedros Azaroglu, seeks review of an adverse final judgment in a proceeding to recover approximately $29,000 in back wages from his deceased employer’s estate.

The decedent, Harry M. Burt, was instrumental in assisting plaintiff to come to the United States and once in the United States Burt helped find him employment. In addition an oral agreement was made between plaintiff and decedent which provided that plaintiff would receive one hundred dollars per week for the performance of various personal services for Burt. Burt died on November 8, 1969 and plaintiff, following publication of the notice to' creditors in August 1970, timely filed a claim against the estate in October 1970 for back wages allegedly unpaid since 1963 in the amount of $28,976.85. Plaintiff’s claim was not paid by the executors and the cause came on for trial on January 8, 1971, at which time the court found that plaintiff’s action was barred by F.S. § 95.11 (7) (b), F.S.A., which set a one year time limit for actions to recover wages. Thereafter this appeal ensued.

Plaintiff urges this court to find that the compensation sought was a salary as distinguished from a wage thereby making the statute of limitations inapplicable. Broward Builders Exchange, Inc. v. Goebring, Fla.1970, 231 So.2d 513. After careful review of the record on appeal we hold that the services performed by plaintiff were personal in nature, the money sought must be considered wages rather than salary and this action falls within the statute of limitations. Buenger v. Kennedy, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 463.

The only remaining issue on appeal is whether F.S. § 95.11(7) (b), F.S.A., completely bars plaintiff’s action. Plaintiff maintains that his action is saved by the *423fact that a timely claim was filed against decedent’s estate in accordance with F.S. § 733.16(1), F.S.A., and the statute of limitations under F.S. § 95.11(7) (b), F.S.A., is tolled. Controlling in this situation is the case of Lucom v. Atlantic National Bank of West Palm Beach, 354 F.2d 51 (5th Cir. 1965) which holds that in Florida when two statutes of limitation are applicable to a particular situation, both statutes limit the time in which an action may be brought and the dilatory litigant is caught by whichever runs first. As a result of this, plaintiff’s claim against decedent’s estate does not toll the application of F.S. § 95.11 (7) (b), F.S.A., and the trial court correctly interpreted the interaction of these two statutes.

Accordingly the judgment herein appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                               5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            5107988
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4368261
<ALLOWANCES>                                        59237
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2123652
<PP&E>                                          161678086
<DEPRECIATION>                                   59107605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  151578346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            22229963
<BONDS>                                         152306729
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    151578346
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14569553
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14053301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4767322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3322899)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        


</TABLE>