alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Robert Wesley FOWLER, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-656.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus dismissed.
#### NATIONAL COLD TRANSPORT, INC., Petitioner, v. William T. MAYO, Chairman, et al., Respondents.

No. 43248.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 9, 1973.

John P. Bond, Coral Gables, for petitioner.

Prentice P. Pruitt and Jerry M. Johns, Tallahassee, for Florida Public Service Commission, respondent.

Martin Sack, Jr., Jacksonville, for Atlantic Cold Storage Corp., intervenor.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review Orders of the Florida Public Service Commission No. 10339, dated October 16, 1972; and No. 10420 dated December 5, 1972.

After oral argument and upon consideration of the petition, the briefs, and the record, we conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and DREW (Retired), JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      11,542,305
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,022,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,564,805
<PP&E>                                      38,480,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,045,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,402,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,643,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,045,624
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 21 Subsidiaries of Registrant State of
    
    
    
    PercentageCompany Name
    
    Incorporation
    
    Tax I.D.
    
    OwnershipCitizens Insurance Company of
America (CICA)
    
    Colorado
    
    84-0583103
    
    100% DirectCitizens USA Life Insurance
Company (CUSA)
    
    Illinois
    
    37-0862705
    
    100% IndirectCitizens National Life
Insurance Company (CNLIC)
    
    Texas
    
    75-0892859
    
    100% IndirectComputing Technology, Inc.
(CTI)
    
    Colorado
    
    84-1037266
    
    100% IndirectFirst Alliance Insurance
Company (FAIC)
    
    Kentucky
    
    61-1274538
    
    100% IndirectFuneral Homes of America, Inc.
(FHA)
    
    Louisiana
    
    72-1148400
    
    100% IndirectInsurance Investors, Inc. (III)
    
    Texas
    
    74-1458561
    
    100% IndirectKYWIDE Insurance
Management, Inc. (KYWIDE)
    
    Kentucky
    
    31-1561998
    
    100% IndirectMid-American Alliance
Corporation (Mid-American)
    
    Missouri
    
    43-1211028
    
    100% IndirectMid-American Alliance
Insurance Agency, Inc. (MAAIA)
    
    Missouri
    
    43-1211028
    
    100% IndirectMid-American Associates
Agency, Inc. (MAAAI)
    
    Missouri
    
    43-1437941
    
    100% IndirectMid American Century Life
Insurance Company (MACLIC)
    
    Missouri
    
    43-1309533
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Alliance Insurance
Company (SAIC)
    
    Arkansas
    
    71-0572974
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Life Insurance
Company (SPLIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    72-1308780
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Fire Insurance
Company (SPFIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    72-1308781
    
    100% Indirect
 105
#### Tina Marie ARNOLD, a minor, by her next friend, Merritt M. Arnold, and Merritt M. Arnold, Individually, Appellants, v. The CLARKE-GRAVELY CORPORATION, formerly known as Gravely Corporation, Appellee.

No. R-251.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 22, 1973.

Elmer Norton, of Norton & Wood, Jacksonville, for appellants.

George L. Hudspeth of Mahoney, Had-low, Chambers, & Adams, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal and the briefs of the parties herein having been fully considered, and it appearing therefrom that appellants have failed to demonstrate that the judgment appealed is erroneous, the said judgment is therefore affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Document

Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT


The Companies and Executive are currently parties to the Second Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement dated as of August 3, 2020 (the “Agreement”; capitalized terms used and not defined herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement).


           WHEREAS, the Executive’s United States automobile lease referenced in Section 3(i) of Schedule 6 to the Agreement has expired and a new lease for a similar model automobile will exceed the current maximum monthly payment;


WHEREAS, Company and Executive wish to amend Section 3(i) of Schedule 6 to the Agreement so as to increase the maximum amount for lease or loan payments;


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12(c) of the Employment Agreement, any modification of the Agreement must be agreed to in a writing signed by Executive and an officer of the Company (other than Executive);


Accordingly, in consideration of the premises and the respective covenants and agreements of the parties set forth below, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:


A.US Automobile Payments.  Section 3(i) of Schedule 6 to the Agreement is amended to replace “$1,400 per month” with “$2,067 per month”.


B.No Other Changes. Except as amended by this Amendment, all other terms of the Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.




[Remainder of Page Left Blank Intentionally; Signature Page Follows]








































IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Amendment have executed this Amendment as of August 12, 2022.
EXLSERVICE HOLDINGS, INC.


By: /s/ Ajay Ayyappan____________
       Name: Ajay Ayyappan
       Title: Corporate Secretary


ROHIT KAPOOR


By: /s/ Rohit Kapoor______________
       Name: Rohit Kapoor
# C_2012330EN.01000101.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6684 — Vivescia/Atrixo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 330/01

On 22 October 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6684. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6684. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2012133EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/1

---

2012/C 133/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 126, 28.4.2012

OJ C 126, 28.4.2012

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 118, 21.4.2012

OJ C 109, 14.4.2012

OJ C 89, 24.3.2012

OJ C 80, 17.3.2012

OJ C 73, 10.3.2012

OJ C 65, 3.3.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
This opinion is subject to administrative correction befor e final disposition.

Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and ATTANASIO Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Juan CORREA Sergeant (E

- 5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 20 2000185

Decided: 30 March 2021 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge : K . Scott Woodard

Senten ce adjudged 14 April 2020 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune , North Carolina, consist ing of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 30 months , a fine of $ 3,000 .00, and a dishonorable discharge.
For Appellant: Captain Thomas P. Belsky , JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.United States v. Correa , NMCCA No. 20 2000185 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFI RMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
#### Jay MORTON, Appellant, v. U-M PUBLISHING, INC., a Florida corporation, (formerly known as Tampa Hills, Inc.), Appellee.

No. 70-1249.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 13, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  1965 to 1996
                                                                                                       
                 First    Second     Third     Fourth
    Year       Quarter   Quarter   Quarter    Quarter
                                                    
 1996......      65.1                              
 1995.......     64.2      64.7      65.0       65.1
 1994.......     63.8      63.8      64.1       64.2 
 1993\r.....     63.7      63.9      64.2       64.2
                                                   
 1993.......     64.2      64.4      64.7       64.6
 1992.......     64.0      63.9      64.3       64.4
 1991.......     63.9      63.9      64.2       64.2
 1990.......     64.0      63.7      64.0       64.1
 1989\r.....     63.9      63.8      64.1       63.8
                                                    
 1989.......     63.9      63.9      64.0       63.8
 1988.......     63.7      63.7      64.0       63.8
 1987.......     63.8      63.8      64.2       64.1
 1986.......     63.6      63.8      63.8       63.9
 1985.......     64.1      64.1      63.9       63.5
 1984.......     64.6      64.6      64.6       64.1 
 1983.......     64.7      64.7      64.8       64.4
 1982.......     64.8      64.9      64.9       64.5
 1981.......     65.6      65.3      65.6       65.2
 1980.......     65.5      65.5      65.8       65.5
 1979\r.....     64.8      64.9      65.8       65.4
                                                    
 1979.......     65.3      65.1      66.0       65.8
 1978.......     64.8      64.4      65.2       65.4
 1977.......     64.8      64.5      65.0       64.9
 1976.......     64.6      64.6      64.9       64.8
 1975.......     64.4      64.9      64.6       64.5
 1974.......     64.8      64.8      64.6       64.4
 1973.......     64.9      64.4      64.4       64.4
 1972.......     64.3      64.5      64.3       64.4
 1971.......     64.0      64.1      64.4       64.5
 1970.......     64.3      64.0      64.4       64.0
 1969.......     64.1      64.4      64.4       64.4
 1968.......     63.6      64.1      64.1       63.6
 1967.......     63.3      63.9      63.8       63.5
 1966.......     63.5      63.2      63.3       63.8
 1965.......     62.9      62.9      62.9       63.4
                                                    
 \r Revised.
   
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.75**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office 	301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax) 301-457-1037 (TDD) e-mail: 2000usa@census.gov Statistical Information Staff Population Division 301-457-2422 e-mail: pop@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12:01 A.M. EDT, MAY 18, 2001 (FRIDAY)

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Demographic Profile for the District of Columbia

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the *Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000* for the District of Columbia, a one-page table providing Census 2000 data on age and sex distribution, race, Hispanic origin, household relationship and type, housing occupancy and tenure (whether the housing occupant owns or rents). 

The profile includes nearly 100 data items in all, plus percentage distributions.

In addition to the profile of the state as a whole, similar demographic profiles for counties, places and other geographic components of the state can be accessed on an embargoed basis at <https://www.census.gov/dcmd/www/embargo/embargo_demoprofile.html>. After the release time, go to the Census Bureau's online search-and-retrieval database *American FactFinder* <http://factfinder2.census.gov> or to its Demographic Profile Page <https://www.census.gov/census2000/demoprofile.html>. You will also be able to download the profiles from the bureau's file transfer protocol site <http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/>. 

For information about how to order paper copies of Census 2000 demographic profiles, contact Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, 301-457-4100; or e-mail:<webmaster@census.gov>. 

For local context, contact the District of Columbia State Data Center, 202-442-7603; e-mail: <herb.bixhorn@dc.gov>.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### MOYA v. CASAS.

No. 36076.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 193 So.2d 60.
NUMBER 13-08-00720-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT, Appellant,

v.

ALICIA FUENTES, Appellee. 

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 370th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, State Office of Risk Management, perfected an appeal from a judgment

entered by the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-900-05-

G. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds appellant
2

no longer wishes to pursue its appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 21st day of May, 2009.
Estimate of PM10 fugitive dust from coal trains (controlled verus uncontrolled)

Adapted from page C-16 of the State submittal

Rail Coal Dust Emission Factor (kg dust/tonne of coal transported) = 0.1*(0.62*D)0.6*((365-P)/365)*(SD/D)*((100-CE)/100)*SF

Where: D = total rail distance from origin to destination (km) = 2414

P = number of precipitation days = 177

CE = coal dust control efficiency (i.e. surfactant efficiency) = 21.25

SF = scaling factor from TSP to PM10 = 0.5

SD = segment distance through the maintenance area (km) = 3.8

10.51

3.01

Base emission 

factor Precipitation

Segment 

distance

level of 

control

Emission 

factor

2011 coal 

exports 

(tons)

Kent controlled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0016 0.7875 0.002566 4,854,451

Kent uncontrolled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0016 1 0.003258 4,854,451

Seattle controlled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0044 0.7875 0.007096 4,854,451

Seattle uncontrolled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0044 1 0.009011 4,854,451

Tacoma controlled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0012 0.7875 0.002032 4,854,451

Tacoma uncontrolled 8.036692898 0.52 0.0012 1 0.002581 4,854,451

total change in fugitive dust emissions

Change in 

fugitive dust 

emissions 

(controlled 

versus 

uncontrolled)

Total PM10 

inventory 

(tons)

Change in 

estimated 

fugitive dust as 

a percentage 

of total 

inventory

Kent 3.704772093 140.4 2.64%

Seattle 10.24661966 734.5 1.40%

Tacoma 2.934569474 528.2 0.56%

Total 16.88596122 1403.1 1.20%
P)/365)*(SD/D)*((100-CE)/100)*SF

 (0 for 9 months, and then 85 for last 3 months of 2011 withadopted surfactant requirement)

Kent

Seattle

Tacoma

fugitive 

dust (kg)

fugitive 

dust 

(tons)

delta 

(tons)

12455.16 13.72945

15816.08 17.43422 3.704772

34448.36 37.97277

43743.94 48.21939 10.24662

9865.799 10.87517

12528 13.80974 2.934569

e in fugitive dust emissions 16.88596
#### Harris HALIBURTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-843.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

We, Robert W. Hale, President and Chief Executive Officer, and J. L. Dickinson,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Continental Global Group, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
       ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
       as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

/s/ Robert W. Hale                          /s/ J. L. Dickinson
-------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Robert W. Hale, President and Chief         J. L. Dickinson, Vice President and
   Executive Officer                           Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  March 31, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.