alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012390EN.01000601.xml

| 18.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 December 2012

2012/C 390/08

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3160 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4613 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81200 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7540 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2082 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3705 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,222 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 287,19 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0890 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4647 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3472 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2494 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2990 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1991 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5604 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6062 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 411,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2502 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2105 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5335 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 686,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0264 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,048 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5650 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,270 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7501 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8182 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,2160 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3160

JPY

Japanese yen

110,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4613

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81200

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7540

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2082

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3705

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,222

HUF

Hungarian forint

287,19

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0890

RON

Romanian leu

4,4647

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3472

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2494

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2990

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1991

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5604

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6062

KRW

South Korean won

1 411,50

ZAR

South African rand

11,2502

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2105

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5335

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 686,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0264

PHP

Philippine peso

54,048

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5650

THB

Thai baht

40,270

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7501

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8182

INR

Indian rupee

72,2160

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit
10.1


 


Fiscal Year 2017 Officer Bonus Plan


 


Our compensation committee and board of directors
have adopted a bonus plan for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017 for company executives, including its named executive officers.
The bonus plan provides an opportunity for each participant to earn an annual cash bonus, 50% of which will be based on the achievement
of target earnings before taxes and 50% of which will be based on two strategic initiatives supporting long-term growth and profitability.


 


If minimum earnings before taxes are achieved, then
the President and Chief Executive Officer will be eligible to receive a bonus equal to 12.50% of her annual base salary. If target
earnings before taxes are achieved, then she will be eligible to receive a bonus equal to 25.00% of her annual base salary.


 


If minimum earnings before taxes are achieved, then
the Chief Financial Officer will be eligible to receive a bonus equal to 7.50% of his annual base salary. If target earnings before
taxes are achieved, then he will be eligible to receive a bonus equal to 15.00% of his annual base salary.


 


Thirty percent of any earnings before taxes exceeding
the target will be allocated to a bonus pool for all bonus-eligible employees and allocated among the bonus-eligible employees
pro rata based on his or her targeted bonus payout. Depending on achievement of the strategic initiatives, each of the named executive
officers will be eligible to receive an additional bonus amount equal to between 6.25% and 37.50% of annual base salary with respect
to the President and Chief Executive Officer and between 3.75% and 22.50% of annual base salary with respect to the Chief Financial
Officer.
# CA2013294DE.01000101.xml

| 10.10.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 294/1

---

RESERVELISTE (1)

1

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN EPSO/AD/237/12

KONFERENZDOLMETSCHER (m/w) DEUTSCHER SPRACHE (DE)

(2013/C 294 A/01)

Besoldungsgruppe AD 5

| BAUER (EVSEN) | Jessica |
| --- | --- |
| DETHLEFS | Martina |
| HAMMACHER (RICKHOFF) | Astrid |
| KOSTYAL | Judith Linda |
| POTZ | Alexandra |
| RIEZINGER | Ursula |

BAUER (EVSEN)

Jessica

DETHLEFS

Martina

HAMMACHER (RICKHOFF)

Astrid

KOSTYAL

Judith Linda

POTZ

Alexandra

RIEZINGER

Ursula

Besoldungsgruppe AD 7

| BLACH | Susanne |
| --- | --- |
| CLAUSSEN | Christa |
| KOMMER | Xenia Katharina |
| LUTHY | Christine Irene Adjoavi |
| NGUYEN-TAT | Jens-Oliver Quy |
| PALACIOS EHRLICH | Natalia |
| PULTZ | Cordula |
| SCHIERING | Pia |

BLACH

Susanne

CLAUSSEN

Christa

KOMMER

Xenia Katharina

LUTHY

Christine Irene Adjoavi

NGUYEN-TAT

Jens-Oliver Quy

PALACIOS EHRLICH

Natalia

PULTZ

Cordula

SCHIERING

Pia

Die Reserveliste gilt bis zum 23. Juli 2016.

23. Juli 2016

---

(1)  Auf ausdrücklichen Wunsch einer erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmerin oder eines erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmers wird ihr bzw. sein Name nicht veröffentlicht.

1

---
# C_2013054EN.01000301.xml

| 23.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6852 — CVC/Cerved Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 54/02

On 15 February 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6852. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6852. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Tommy McDOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-491.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Mrs. Gladys POWELL, Individually and on Behalf of her minor daughter, Louise Powell v. LOGAN CAB COMPANY and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. Mrs. Wilhelmina COLE, Individually *and on*Behalf of her two minor daughters, Marie Cole and Georgia Mae Cole v. LOGAN CAB COMPANY and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

No. 53533.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: Mrs. Gladys Powell, Individually and on behalf of her minor daughter, Louise Powell, Mrs. Wilhelmina Cole, Individually, and on behalf of her two minor daughters, Marie Cole and Georgia Mae Cole, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 276 So.2d 324; 276 So.2d 325.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.

DIXON, J.,

dissents from the refusal to grant. The facts in the Court of Appeal opinion are convincing that the common carrier violated the high degree of care owed its passengers.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.189**REVISED****
**Contact:**  Public Information Office							301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)						301-457-1037 (TDD)Jeri Green301-457-1371

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2001

## DeKalb County Resident Named to Census Bureau Advisory Committee

Tracey-Ann Nelson, of Dekalb County, Ga., former director of the Georgia governor's Census Policy Office and a public relations and public affairs consultant, has been named to the Census Bureau's Advisory Committee on the African American Population.

"I'm looking forward to establishing effective working relationships with other census advisory committee members on behalf of African Americans and contributing to planning for the census of 2010," Nelson said in a statement.

As a member of the nine-person committee, Nelson will use her Census 2000 experience in Georgia to advise the Census Bureau on ways to achieve a complete and accurate count of African Americans in the 2010 census and the ongoing American Community Survey (ACS). The ACS is currently being tested in some areas of the country and is scheduled to go nationwide in 2003.

Nelson was Gov. **Roy** Barnes' personal representative during Census 2000 operations in Georgia. Before that, she was congressional aide and press secretary to U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney, D-Ga. As a congressional aide, she managed women's and children's issues and international affairs. Nelson holds a bachelor's degree in political science and is currently pursuing a master's degree in public administration.

Five race and ethnic advisory committees advise the Census Bureau on issues affecting African Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Hispanics, Asians, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders. The committees consist of members of the public at large, as well as representatives of national, state, local and tribal entities, and nonprofit and private sector organizations.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

September 15, 2015 

Petitioner: 

Hawk Aerial, LLC 

Kevin J. Gould, CEO 

114 Homesteads Rd. 

Placitas, NM 87043 

Cell: 425-218-3723 

Application to Amend 

Section 333 Exemption No. 11306 -·. ·;; 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1023 

Email: kevin.gould@hawkaerial.com 

Website: www.hawkaerial.com 

Greetings, 

-· l; 

. ~ ' 

,_ --,' 

·:: :l i 

By letter from the FAA dated April 8, 2015, an exemption was granted to Hawk Aerial for relief under Section 

333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11306 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1023. 

Hawk Aerial hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to the Autonomous Avionics 

SkyTractor model: 

• The SkyTractor is an "X-8 Coaxialn multi-rotor unmanned aircraft (UA), an electric vertical takeoff 

and landing (VTOL) platform with a maximum gross weight of 6800 grams (15 pounds), diagonal 

width dimension of 69 em and aircraft height of 30.4 em. 

• It uses GPS for navigational guidance. 

• In the event of a loss of communication link, the SkyTractor automatically returns to home and 

lands. 

• In the event of flight beyond range, the SkyTractor's flight termination system automatically returns 

the aircraft home and lands. 

• The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in the FAA's Exemption No. 11306 apply without 

modification to this application to include the Autonomous Avionics SkyTractor model in Exemption 

No. 11306. 

Copies of the Aircraft Flight Manual and Users Guide have been mailed to the FAA at the cc address shown 

below. 

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional information 

that is required • 

• Kevin J. Gould 

Airman Certificate #2830326 

CEO, Hawk Aerial LLC 

cc: ATIN: The Office of Rulemaking 

FAA Headquarters, Building lOA 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20951
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7714
In Re: ANDRE SYLVESTER WATTS, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: December 11, 2002 Decided: January 8, 2003 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Sylvester Watts, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Andre S. Watts petitions for a writ of mandamus. Watts seeks an order compelling the United States Parole Commission to grant a parole hearing. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Moreover, jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against an agency of the United States lies with the district courts, not this court. 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (2000); Estate of Michael v. Lullo , 173 F.3d 503, 506 (4th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny without prejudice the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Datascope Corp. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   o the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   o the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

September 13, 2005
                                         /s/ Lawrence Saper
                                         ------------------
                                         Lawrence Saper
                                         Chairman of the Board and
                                         Chief Executive Officer




                                         /s/ Murray Pitkowsky
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Murray Pitkowsky
                                         Senior Vice President,
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1115, -1246 GEORGE E. KERSEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS, Defendant-Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in case nos. 1:06-MC-416 and 1:07-MC-302, Judge Emmett G. Sullivan. Before MOORE, Circuit Judge. ORDER The court considers whether to waive the filing fee for these appeals. In the above-captioned appeals, George E. Kersey seeks review of orders of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia denying his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court determines that under these circumstances, waiver of the filing fee is warranted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The filing fee is waived for each of the above-captioned appeals. FOR THE COURT 

## APR 1 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date

cc: George E. Kersey Alan Burch, Esq. s17 Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT Or APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

APR 0 1 2009 CLERK
#### Paul E. ROSENBAUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2673.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### A. VARGAS, as legal and natural guardian of an infant female child, Petitioner, v. Dr. J. M. PRESLEY, Director, Dade County Youth Service, an Agency of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 67-845.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 25, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus denied.
# C_2013156EN.01000101.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/1

---

2013/C 156/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 147, 25.5.2013

OJ C 147, 25.5.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 141, 18.5.2013

OJ C 129, 4.5.2013

OJ C 123, 27.4.2013

OJ C 114, 20.4.2013

OJ C 108, 13.4.2013

OJ C 101, 6.4.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.33


TERMINATION  OF LEASE AGREEMENT


THIS TERMINATION OF LEASE AGREEMENT (this "Termination") is made as of September 15, 2016 (the "Effective Date"), by and between WF-FB NLTX, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Landlord"), and FARMER BROS. CO., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant").


RECITALS:


A. Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease Agreement dated July 17, 2015, as subsequently amended by First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated December 29, 2015,  and  by Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated March 10, 2016 (as amended, the "Lease"), whereby Tenant leases from Landlord that certain parcel of real property, and improvements thereon, located in Northlake, Denton County, Texas and more particularly described in the Lease (the "Property"). All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have their same meaning as assigned thereto in the Lease.


A.Pursuant to Section 45 of the Lease, Tenant has timely exercised the Purchase Option, and Tenant has selected  September 15, 2016 as the date of the Option Closing.


B.In conjunction with the Option Closing, Landlord and Tenant now desire to terminate the Lease./


AGREEMENT:


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


1.Termination.    Landlord and Tenant hereby terminate the Lease effective as of the Effective Date. Landlord and Tenant agree that on the date of the Option  Closing, the Termination of Memorandum of Lease Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" shall be recorded in the Real Property Records of Denton  County, Texas. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant's obligations under  Section 7 of the Lease, and the indemnity contained in Section 26 and Section 36 of the Lease are hereby remade by tenant and shall survive the termination of the Lease.


2.Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and no prior agreement, understanding, or representation pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose.


3.Authority. Landlord and Tenant each represent as follows: (a) Landlord and Tenant are duly organized and in existence in the state of their organization, (b) Landlord and Tenant have full right and authority to enter into this Termination.


4.Counterparts. This Memorandum may be executed in  multiple  counterparts,  each  of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.








[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES]













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord  and Tenant have executed this Termination as of the Effective Date.






LANDLORD:


WF-FB NLTX, LLC, 
a Delaware limited liability company


By:  John D. Altmeyer, Manager








(Signatures continue on the following page)











TENANT:


FARMER BROS. CO.,
a Delaware corporation




By: /s/ Isaac N. Johnston, Jr.
Name:   Isaac N. Johnston, Jr. 
Title:     Treasurer and CFO
#### Rose POWELL and William C. Powell, her husband, Appellants, v. W. A. HENRY, d/b/a W. A. Henry & Sons, Harold G. O’Quinn and Kenneth Adair, Appellees.

No. 67-387.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 6, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.
#### CITY OF STUART, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellant, v. Carl F. ELLWANGER et al., Appellees.

No. 74-113.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.