alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Betty T. RANDAL, Appellant, v. Thomas J. BAKER, M.D., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-665.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1973.

Betty T. Randal, in pro. per.

Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, and Jonathon P. Lynn, Quinton, Leib & Aurell and Paul C. Huck, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and LESTER, M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Betty T. Randal, appeals a summary final judgment entered for the appellees who are medical doctors. Appellant’s complaint charged medical malpractice in the performance of cosmetic surgery. The trial judge entered a summary judgment for the appellees upon the basis of the pleadings, affidavits and discovery in the file. We have thoroughly examined the record in the light of appellant’s brief and we find that this case is governed by the principles set forth in Rosen v. Parkway General Hospital, Inc., Fla.App. 1972, 265 So.2d 93. See also Martin v. Parks, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 220; Crovella v. Cochrane, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 307.

Affirmed.
# C_2011270EN.01000102.xml

| 13.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5902 — LWM/RWI/F&F)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 270/02

On 26 October 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5902. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5902. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of APAC Customer Services, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 9, 2007
    /s/ Robert J. KellerRobert J. KellerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIB

| (1)   | The      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2008 (the “Form      10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;    and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/Renato      Cataldo       |   | /s/Dale      Heins                         |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| Renato      Cataldo          |   | Dale      Heins                            |
| President      and           |   | Senior Vice      President, Finance,  |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   | Chief      Financial Officer and Treasurer |
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Cox
Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I,
James O. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



                                       By: /s/ James O. Robbins
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          James O. Robbins
                                          Chief Executive Officer

                                       Date: March 31, 2003
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases2010 Census

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB11-CN.182**
**Contact:**Public Information Office301-763-3030763-3762 (fax)

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, SEPT. 20, 2011

## Media Advisory — Census Bureau to Release 2010 Census Statistics on Same-Sex Households

**Audio conference ― access information****Online presentation ― access informationPlease login early, as some setup is required.**

Follow @uscensusbureau on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and Ustream

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
No. 11437.

#### Roman et al. *v.*Leonard et al., Partners.

Decided December 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana county.

*Mr. W. S. Emmons,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. S. W. Ramsey,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2013036EN.01001202.xml

| 8.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6802 — Droege/Also-Actebis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 36/05

On 30 January 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6802. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6802. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### The AMERICAN FEDERATION OF POLICE, a non-profit Florida corporation, Appellant, v. W. Wirt CULBERTSON, as Tax Assessor of Dade County, Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-399.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2012398EN.01000901.xml

| 22.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 December 2012

2012/C 398/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3209 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4612 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81420 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5945 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2077 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3155 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,189 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 287,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0645 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4473 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3709 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2662 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3090 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2371 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6029 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6126 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 421,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3067 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2311 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5370 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 758,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0430 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,300 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5950 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,459 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7360 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0072 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,7490 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3209

JPY

Japanese yen

110,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4612

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81420

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5945

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2077

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3155

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,189

HUF

Hungarian forint

287,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0645

RON

Romanian leu

4,4473

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3709

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2662

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3090

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2371

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6029

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6126

KRW

South Korean won

1 421,45

ZAR

South African rand

11,3067

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2311

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5370

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 758,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0430

PHP

Philippine peso

54,300

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5950

THB

Thai baht

40,459

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7360

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0072

INR

Indian rupee

72,7490

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# 325
# C_2012275EN.01000201.xml

| 12.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6660 — Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse/Ecoval Holding BV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 275/03

On 31 August 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6660. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6660. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertify that pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”)of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information containedin the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company at and for the periodsindicated.

 

Dated: November 8, 2007
|   | By:    | /S/ DAVID J. BARRETT                   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | David J. Barrett                       |
|   | Title: | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 
|   | By:    | /S/ HARRY T. HAWKS                                    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Harry T. Hawks                                        |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### EAST COAST SUPPLY CORP., etc., Petitioner, v. A. P. I. OF FLORIDA, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 42359.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 27, 1972. .

Certiorari denied. 267 So.2d 704.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Paul J.B. Murphy, III, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A ofNew World Restaurant Group, Inc.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)            Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

c)            Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)            Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Dated: May 6, 2005 | By: /s/ PAUL J. B. MURPHY, III       |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------|
|               | Paul J.B. Murphy, III                |
|               | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Harold LOWE, Respondent.

No. 39016.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 3, 1970.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and James L. DeMoully, Asst. Public Defender, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition to review by certiorari the decision of the district court appearing as Lowe v. State, 226 So.2d 430 (2d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1969), is hereby denied. See State v. Reynolds, Fla., 238 So.2d 598, Opinion filed March 11, 1970.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.