alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Conolog Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Benou Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report
 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         
|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|                        |                                                                                                                          | 
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Dated:
 January 7, 2013 | /s/ Robert
 S. Benou                                                                                                     | 
|                        |                                                                                                                          | 
|                        | Robert S.
 Benou                                                                                                         | 
|                        | Chief
 Executive Officer (Principal
 Financial Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer (Principal
 Financial Officer) | 

The foregoing certification is
being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
#### Herman PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-194.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1973.

Lawrence S. Katz, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of robbery and sentenced to seven years in prison. On this appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment and in addition urges that the court should have dismissed the cause pursuant to Rule 3.190 (c)(4), CrPR, 33 F.S.A.1

We have reviewed the record as required to decide the point addressed to the sufficiency of the evidence. The proof of appellant’s guilt is full and convincing. Davis v. State, Fla.App.1972, 3rd D.C.A., 267 So. 2d 85, filed October 10, 1972.

The second point does not present reversible error because appellant’s motion which was presented at the onset of trial was untimely. Nevertheless, we have considered the motion on its merits and find that the trial court would have been correct in denying the motion if it had been timely filed.

Affirmed.

1

. “Rule 3.190. Pre-Trial Motions

> 

> “(c) Time for Moving to Dismiss. — Unless the court grants him further time, the defendant shall move to dismiss the indictment, information or affidavit either before or upon arraignment. The court in its discretion may permit the defendant to plead and thereafter to file a motion to dismiss at a time to bo set by the court. Except for objections based upon fundamental grounds, every ground for a motion to dismiss which is not presented by a motion to dismiss within the time herein-above provided for shall be taken to have been waived. However, the court may at any time entertain a motion to dismiss on any of the following grounds :

> 

> “(4) There are no material disputed facts and the undisputed facts do not establish a prima facie case of guilt against the defendant. The facts on which such motion is based should be specifically alleged and the motion sworn to.”
# C_2012400EN.01000202.xml

| 28.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/2

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.6782 — HIG Capital/Petrochem Carless Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 400/04

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 28 November 2012, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between HIG Europe Capital Partners LP and Petrochem Carless Holdings Limited. On 19 December 2012, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.

---
Se ete
6 boKS la} or fio}

a EE CP 7 DEEEEREEEEEGE

WES COC ACOCRC CT BAGG nn aaa
oe ERT ECR REEARRRRECEERRERERREEEUEECESESEE

orvrenccronn a i Ww TNC Yoel Te Tw A ow Tol al) el el | ll
A CB YB SA SS GS a

= Ss Sess I cs Bias | tsa || BSS ts
ROMS ERSESESES SAMS BESS SEREEESEERE

swarers IECK RI CCGUERECAOT AE BRNERTOGRERBDT NIA

Nt RTS ih
ak ; ) ai , y ay,

feet ACL eT

eco [fet lM et SY it) =i oY nt a i SY Ot ALY

SERDERORRERECECERONECORKE

Te OP OEC OR Suro coor er ern
SE UOPEOrE COP Cer ee cnererrcnn

2 CEP er enone
oo GEERT PEPPER ECEREEREL EEE
PAIS CEP ER SE EWES Rs. EEESSEERN

errela] WHER ATR EAH ee ee eae a a

ARIAS eT | UT
HEA HL Wh

gre) Jao/aeeeueel SEEESESEEESOECE R
Se REEREMSRERERERREESEERE

a
ia fi] a4 . ie Wil 3
flee a CODORERRER NC lt dla ’

emma SS else ela sl eloalsisis eal
rertooremnonowornn 21 YW SY YN SS YL Ss
sareramerm || gal al al al al a al al al al i tl al wl ei ae hrs

comers fl a Wala WAT al al ol Pea Na
SRNR CERNE REE

SSCRANKERRENREEAN ERE EEE

(4) opemeg *(aE) OTE —zOg | &

SLAC RRAT RARER RRL EREASEAR

O10!

B,D, Me,
Job "Tes"
qWUA{

VV

or with a
worker.

K36G)

on omigen
: CPLR REN OURS
goney week. A

assigned to jpublic emer
, enter present coc upe

|
4
{i
q
|
i
:
|
::
:

tor ulcises,
&. D, Ma, At:

at work,
or 24)

(Omg 20 80x) geodo BUTT e20ux
pepseal Weed TvisoA Hy Fey

bout publicly

a

iona

Ey Wier
Ah
t

POPULATION SCHEDULE

as his usual

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENAUA

_ SIXTEENTH CENGUS OF THR UNITED BTATEE: 1940

Regia pps. Pm .

this, enter that
and a which he ‘s physically able to work.

-  poRm: :
Seamless

Elementary ochesl, latte Mhgrede.___ 1, S.ete.,S es >

is was ble to

Phir,
ee
2

18
of
6

USUAL OCCUPATION, INDUSTRY, AND CLASS OF WORKER

eccupation which the perssa

FOR PERSONS 14 YEARS OLD AND
ae eek. Tee
pee dvd

Enser that
wy and

Cadlego, 02 co ou bien each pear ogee”

College, iat to Mth yeetennn. O-4,0-4,00,04 =

(Name of institution ae
Col. 14. HIGHEST GRADE OF SCHOOL COMPLETED:

not the U.S. Census Bureau.
rchives.gov for more informat

isit http://www.a q

em

available records like the one shown here.

Inetitutian eeeneerrerrene
March 1940...

the National Archives and Records Administration,

EDUCATION

ad a. fick la) Unines rperated place vhhinbpaialed pleek Woslad Wi ae ea pa yernat

i rie es
a” ce . ee Block Noa. AG...
. .

“Historic « census vecords'2 are maintained and released by

V

Ane
ee
absent from household.
Write “Ab” after names of such persons.
Col. 18. COLOR OR RACE:

division of coun

Ine -rporated places. o¥.. 2

Township or other
8. Caidren under | pour of age. Write “Infant”

if child has net been given a

Enter (& after name of person furnishing information.

this household.

1. Persons tem

f Name of each person whose usual place
of residence on April 1, 1940, was in

‘ 8 WO Gag] plrqesncy Hy) Seog

parses 7 ‘Teyaes
fyqyaou 20 ‘peuao f ‘eur0q Jo ene,

oot CRERERE

RS) Raa 1%

Col. 5. VALUE OF HOME, IY OWNED:

111478

HOUSEHOLD DATA

“SUPPLEMENTARY
QUESTIONS
Fcr Persons Enumerated on Lines 55 and 68

a
ay alia mee
“

o © VERT PHiNTIMe GrrteS

wate
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 15


                     INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT
                     --------------------------------------


The Stockholders and Board of Directors
ARV Assisted Living, Inc.:

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of ARV Assisted
Living, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997, and the related
condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three
and six-month periods ended September 30, 1997 and 1996. These condensed
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's 
management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which
is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above
for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of ARV Assisted Living, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein); and in our report dated June 20, 1997, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of March 31, 1997, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Orange County, California
November 13, 1997
# C_2012261EN.01000201.xml

| 30.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 August 2012

2012/C 261/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2545 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 98,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4502 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79180 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3375 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3125 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,810 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,41 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1555 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4775 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2768 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2088 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2402 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7307 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5612 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5728 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 423,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5579 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9696 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4745 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 986,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9153 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,120 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3424 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,316 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5736 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6269 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7880 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2545

JPY

Japanese yen

98,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4502

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79180

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3375

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3125

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,810

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,41

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1555

RON

Romanian leu

4,4775

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2768

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2088

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2402

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7307

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5612

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5728

KRW

South Korean won

1 423,13

ZAR

South African rand

10,5579

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9696

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4745

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 986,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9153

PHP

Philippine peso

53,120

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3424

THB

Thai baht

39,316

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5736

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6269

INR

Indian rupee

69,7880

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2011257EN.01000101.xml

| 1.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6309 — Macquarie Group/Airwave Solutions)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 257/01

On 18 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6309. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6309. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2013096EN.01002201.xml

| 4.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/22

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,75 % on 1 April 2013

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 April 2013

2013/C 96/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2828 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4535 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84840 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3258 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2167 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,828 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 302,10 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7013 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1908 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4208 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3205 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2237 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3010 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9575 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5198 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5877 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 432,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,8463 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9639 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6095 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 504,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9540 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,485 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,676 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5912 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,7274 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,8550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2828

JPY

Japanese yen

119,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4535

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84840

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3258

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2167

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,828

HUF

Hungarian forint

302,10

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7013

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1908

RON

Romanian leu

4,4208

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3205

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2237

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3010

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9575

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5198

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5877

KRW

South Korean won

1 432,77

ZAR

South African rand

11,8463

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9639

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6095

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 504,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9540

PHP

Philippine peso

52,485

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5150

THB

Thai baht

37,676

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5912

MXN

Mexican peso

15,7274

INR

Indian rupee

69,8550

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
# C_2011358EN.01000101.xml

| 8.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6331 — KKR/Silver Lake/Go Daddy Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 358/01

On 12 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6331. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6331. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley J. Gadek, Senior Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1)          | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and                   
|------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2)          | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|             |                                                                                                                                                     
|May 10, 2004 | By:                                                                                                                                                 
|             |                                                                                                                                                     
|             |                                                                                                                                                     
|             |
MODESTO CITYCOUNTY AIRPORT December

8 ,2015 Mr. Randall
S .Fiertz Director

,Airport Compliance and Management Analysis Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue

,SW Washington

,DC 20591

City of Modesto Public Works Department Airport Division 617 Airport Way Modesto CA 95354 209 577-5318 FAX 209 576-1985 Re
:FAA Policy Change 79 FR 66282

-01, Docket FAA 2013-0988 Action Plan for Aviation Fuel Tax Dear Mr. Fiertz

: The City of Modesto, Modesto City-County Airport, has not imposed any general sales tax on aviation fuel that werenot in effect on December 30
,1987, and therefore does not require an action plan

. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter

,please contact meat (209
) 577-53 19 ore-mail to mgermanows ki@modestogov.com. Mark Germanowski Airport Manager Public Works

,City of Modesto
#### Burton GOLDBERG and Joyce Goldberg, his wife, Appellants, v. Burt SASSO, Appellee.

No. 66-762.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 1, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.