alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Burl W. McCRANEY, Petitioner, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 44630.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 14, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed. 282 So.2d 878.
# C_2013110EN.01000102.xml

| 17.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6746 — Mitsui/Severstal/Severstal-SSC-Vsevolozhsk JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 110/02

On 6 February 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6746. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6746. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2013034EN.01000302.xml

| 6.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6748 — Magna/Ixetic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 34/06

On 29 November 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6748. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6748. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
No. 11525.

#### Keslar *v.*Barnard & Karns, a Partnership.

Decided February 8, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Wood county.

*Messrs. Troup & Riegle*and *Messrs. Blackford & Blackford,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. N. R. Harrington,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Pablo H. LaSALLE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 35683.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 28, 1967.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

*15PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court so we issued the writ. However, after hearing argument of the parties and upon further consideration of the briefs and record we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore the writ of certiorari heretofore issued is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 24.1

KPMG

           KPMG LLP
           Chartered Accountants
           Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street              Telephone (604) 691-3000
           Vancouver BC V7K  1K3                        Telefax (604) 691-3031
           Canada                                                  www.kpmg.ca

Mr. Ed Renyk
President
Naptau Gold Corporation
5391 Blundell
Richmond BC  V7C 1H3

June 2, 1999

Dear Mr. Renyk

Please be advised that we decline to stand for re-appointment as auditors of
Naptau Gold Corporation (the "Company").

We recommend that you seek legal advice to ensure all relevant legal, statutory
and regulatory requirements are met.

Yours very truly


/s/ D. C. Peniuk

D.C. Peniuk
 Partner
(604) 691-3105

DCP:cec/83 185

cc   Board of Directors

            KPMG LLP, a Canadian owned limited liability partnership
                     established under the laws of Ontario,
             is a member of KPMG International, a Swiss association
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17150]



[[Page 39807]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10494]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Rembrandt: Painter as Printmaker'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Rembrandt: Painter as Printmaker,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Denver Art Museum, Denver, 
Colorado, from on or about September 16, 2018, until on or about 
January 6, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ffceaecfbe6e0e1bdbbbab6cffcfbeefbeaa1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f5c4a4c5b4640411d1b1a166f5c5b4e5b4a01484059">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-11 of July 27, 2018.

Jennifer Z. Galt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-17150 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2013094EN.01000102.xml

| 3.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6503 — La Poste/Swiss Post/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 94/02

On 4 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6503. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6503. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Continental Information Systems Corporation 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      656
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (352)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,065
<PP&E>                                          23,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,040)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,558
<BONDS>                                          2,710
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,344
<SALES>                                          7,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,856
<CGS>                                            6,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   276
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,448
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,086)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,827)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)


</TABLE>
#### INDIAN LAKE CLUB, a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of Florida, T. L. Goff and Andre A. Demarcillac, Appellants, v. Reginald G. HAINSWORTH and Ruth P. Hainsworth, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 7436.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Feb. 8, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Charles FRIEND, Petitioner, v. Irwin R. LIPPMAN et al., Respondents.

No. 43997.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied, 277 So.2d 318.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### John Westley ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-264.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Leon G. SCHACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and L. L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Appellees.

Nos. 1-435, 1-436.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 26, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2013111EN.01000301.xml

| 18.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6773 — Canon/Iris)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 111/05

On 18 February 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6773. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6773. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
No. 11303.

#### American Bonding Company of Baltimore *v.*Wayne Cooperage Co.

Decided February 8, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Crawford county.

*Messrs. Beer & Beer*and *Mr. J. Walter Wright,*for plaintiff in error,

*Mr. R. V. Sears*and *Mr. R. W. Johnston,*for defendant in-error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, Spear and Shauck, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MEMORANDUM

To: Public Information (MS 5030) Plans Section, Office of Field Operations (MS 5231)

Public Information copy of Exploration Plan Control # - R-05104 Type - Revised Exploration Plan Lease(s) - OCS-G26251 Block - 390 Mississippi Canyon Area Operator - Newfield Exploration Company Subsea Wells A, B, C, and D
Not Found

Attached is a copy of the subject plan for public comments on issues that should be addressed in an Environmental Assessment. It has been deemed submitted as of this date and is under review for approval.

Michelle Griffitt Plan Coordinator Description - Rig Type - Subject: From: May 4, 2011MC390 REP (Control R-5104) Record Log 09/15/2010 –submittal per NTL 2010-N06, Blowout relief well, Pages B-1 thru B-5 and H-1 09/22/2010- RE requested structure map and seismic data, Page C-1 10/19/2010- Regional OSRP W CD calculation, Page H-1 02/01/2011- Public and pr op. EA forms, Page C-1 02/25/2011 – Amended CZM, biological information, Attachments M-1 and M-2, page A-1 03/01/2011- Biological/chemo info per NTL 2009-G39/40, Page E-1 04/01/2011-Waste/discharge forms, Page F-1, K-1 and L-1
No. 11507.

#### The Lake Erie & Western Railroad Co. *v.*Good, Admr., et al.

Decided February 1, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Mercer county.

*Air. John B. Cockrum; Mr. Walter B. Richie*and *Mr. John W. Joree,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Ford & Ruudaibaugh,*for defend*560ants in error.

On petition in error, judgment affirmed.

Crew, Spear and Price, JJ., concur.

On cross-petition in error, judgment against cross-petitioner reversed as per journal entry.

Summers, C. J., Davis, Sitauck and Price, JJ., concur.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed as to the plaintiff in error, The Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company, and on the cross-petition in error, the judgment is reversed, and the petition dismissed as to the cross-petitioner in error, Reuben Hickock, Crew, Spear and Price, JJ., being of the opinion that the judgment as to the railroad company should be affirmed; Summers, C. J., Davis and Shauck, JJ., being of the opinion that upon the undisputed evidence the negligence of the decedent, Arminda Good, contributed as a proximate cause to her death, and Price, J., being of the opinion that a cause of action was not proven against the defendant Hickock.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB00-CN.66**
**Contact:**  Decennial Media Relations													301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)301-457-1037 (TDD)e-mail: 2000usa@census.govCathy McCully Marshall Turner 301-457-4039

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 27, 2000

## Census Bureau Begins Releasing Census 2000 Geographic Files for Redistricting

The Commerce Department's Census Bureau began releasing on a state-by-state basis the Redistricting Census 2000 TIGER/Line® files, designed to support the needs of state redistricting officials. The files contain geographic data for all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, and will be available within the next several weeks. It should be noted that these files do not contain Census 2000 population data but will allow state legislatures to begin preparation for the analysis of the Census 2000 redistricting data scheduled for release no later than April 1, 2001.

The TIGER/Line files are extracts of selected geographic and cartographic information from the Census Bureau's TIGER (Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing) database. They are the first release of the Census 2000 tabulation areas, including the censustract and block numbers that are the foundation for the redistricting process.

Documentation, including a list of which states are available, may be obtained by clicking on the "TIGER" link on the Census Bureau's Internet homepage https://www.census.gov.

Information about other products associated with the Census 2000 Public Law 94-171 Redistricting Data Program also may be obtained by contacting the Census Redistricting Data Office via e-mail at  RDO@census.gov.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1755 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1755

  To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a study on 
matters relating to the claiming and interring of unclaimed remains of 
                   veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 21, 2013

  Mr. Toomey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a study on 
matters relating to the claiming and interring of unclaimed remains of 
                   veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dignified Interment of Our Veterans 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS STUDY ON MATTERS RELATING TO 
              CLAIMING AND INTERRING UNCLAIMED REMAINS OF VETERANS.

    (a) Study and Report Required.--Not later than one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall--
            (1) complete a study on matters relating to the 
        identification, claiming, and interring of unclaimed remains of 
        veterans; and
            (2) submit to Congress a report on the findings of the 
        Secretary with respect to the study required under paragraph 
        (1).
    (b) Matters Studied.--The matters studied under subsection (a)(1) 
shall include the following:
            (1) Determining the scope of issues relating to unclaimed 
        remains of veterans, including an estimate of the number of 
        unclaimed remains of veterans on the day before the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Assessing the effectiveness of the procedures of the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs for claiming and interring 
        unclaimed remains of veterans.
            (3) Identifying and assessing State and local laws that 
        affect the ability of the Secretary to identify, claim, and 
        inter unclaimed remains of veterans.
            (4) Developing recommendations for such legislative or 
        administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
### THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

(512) 463-1312

July 01, 2016

Michael Brett Anthony

Anthony & Peterson, L.L.P

500 N. Water Street, Suite 1010

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. Charles (Chad) E. Baruch

Johnston Tobey Baruch, P.C.

3308 Oak Grove Avenue

Dallas, TX 75204

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Ms. Barbara E. Rosenberg

Assistant City Attorney

1500 Marilla Street, Room 7B North

Dallas, TX 75201-6318

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 15-0094

Court of Appeals Number: 05-13-01651-CV

Trial Court Number: DC-13-08320-J

Style: CITY OF DALLAS

v.

DIANE SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF MATTHEW SANCHEZ, DECEASED, AND ARNOLD SANCHEZ

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion and judgment in the abovereferenced cause. You may obtain a copy of the opinion and judgment through Case Search on

our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/supreme.aspx

. On the Case Search page

simply enter the case number and push the Search button to find the docket page for your case.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

cc: Ms. Lisa Matz (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Gary Fitzsimmons (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John FELTUS v. Rudolph F. BECKER, III, Judge Criminal District Court, Orleans Parish.

No. 62290.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: John Feltus, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. Moot.
EPA-452/R-11-011

December 2011

Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

Research Triangle Park, NC