alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012186EN.01000601.xml

| 26.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 June 2012

2012/C 186/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2488 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4335 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80285 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8165 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2008 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4980 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,813 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 287,53 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2548 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4678 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2703 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2480 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2861 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6908 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5881 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6023 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 451,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5618 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9465 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 836,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9903 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,256 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,4700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,824 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5932 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3833 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,2000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2488

JPY

Japanese yen

99,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4335

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80285

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8165

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2008

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4980

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,813

HUF

Hungarian forint

287,53

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2548

RON

Romanian leu

4,4678

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2703

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2480

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2861

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6908

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5881

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6023

KRW

South Korean won

1 451,66

ZAR

South African rand

10,5618

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9465

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 836,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9903

PHP

Philippine peso

53,256

RUB

Russian rouble

41,4700

THB

Thai baht

39,824

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5932

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3833

INR

Indian rupee

71,2000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this S-8 Registration Statement of our report
dated August 2, 1999 included in Dot Hill Systems Corp.'s Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999.


/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
-----------------------------
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
August 11, 2000
# C_2012162EN.01000301.xml

| 8.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 June 2012

2012/C 162/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2595 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4335 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80860 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9664 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2011 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5885 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,325 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6970 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2700 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4658 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2964 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2613 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2892 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7716 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6272 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6025 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 472,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,4025 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0152 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5645 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 864,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9843 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,384 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6410 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,649 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5557 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5537 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,2030 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2595

JPY

Japanese yen

100,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4335

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80860

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9664

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2011

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5885

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,325

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6970

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2700

RON

Romanian leu

4,4658

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2964

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2613

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2892

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7716

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6272

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6025

KRW

South Korean won

1 472,47

ZAR

South African rand

10,4025

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0152

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5645

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 864,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9843

PHP

Philippine peso

54,384

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6410

THB

Thai baht

39,649

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5557

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5537

INR

Indian rupee

69,2030

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2013072EN.01000101.xml

| 12.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6708 — BMS/Astrazeneca/Amylin Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 72/01

On 1 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6708. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6708. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6083
YAHYA Z. HAKIZIMANAH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97- 1583-AMD) Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 9, 1998 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yahya Z. Hakizimanah, Appellant Pro Se. Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hakizimanah v. Corcoran , No. CA-97-1583-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.155 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau to Release 2010 Census Summary File 1 for Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Nebraska and North Carolina Next week, the U.S. Census Bureau will release the 2010 Census Summary File 1 for Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Nebraska and North Carolina. During June through August, the Census Bureau will provide statistics for states each week on a flow basis. These Summary File 1 tables will provide the most detailed information available so far from the 2010 Census, including cross-tabulations of age, sex, households, families, relationship to householder, characteristics of owners and renters, detailed race and Hispanic or Latino origin groups, and group quarters. The Summary File will be available for each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The information will be available for a variety of geographic areas, with most tables available down to the block or census tract level.
  The Summary File 1 for these states will be available on an embargoed basis for accredited media who are registered for access on Tuesday, June 28 at 10 a.m. The embargo will be lifted and the information released publicly on Thursday, June 30 at 12:01 a.m. To apply for embargo access, go to our Newsroom at <https://www.census.gov/newsroom> and click on “Embargoed Releases.” Please review the Embargo Policy carefully before submitting the embargo registration form.
  For more information about the release of Summary File 1, please visit <http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/summary-file-1.html>
  Twitter Facebook Flickr YouTube Ustream
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.40 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, FEB. 22, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to Hawaii http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  https://www.census.gov/rdo http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html Please visit http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/ for an interactive map showcasing county-level population change from 1960 to 2010, as well as state-level data on race and Hispanic or Latino origin for 2010. The widget will be updated as states are released and can be embedded on your website. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Charles Wilmer GRIGGS v. STATE.

No. 36652.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Registration Statement on Form
S-1 of our report dated February 25, 2000, except for Note 11, as to which the
date is July 21, 2000, and Note 12 as to which the date is August 24, 2000,
relating to the financial statements of AeroGen, Inc. (a company in the
development stage) at December 31, 1998 and 1999, for each of the three years
ended December 31, 1999 and for the cumulative period from November 18, 1991
(date of inception) to December 31, 1999, which appear in such Registration
Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts"
in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
August 25, 2000
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Education
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.57 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, OCT. 9, 2012 School Enrollment in the United States: 2011 The Census Bureau's annual, national-level statistics on the characteristics of students, from nursery to graduate school. According to the statistics, enrollment in private elementary and high schools was 4.1 million in 2011, down from 4.8 million in 2005 and a high of 6.3 million in 1965. Furthermore, non-Hispanic white children now make up only a slight majority of elementary school students (54 percent), down from 58 percent in 2005. For the first time, the Census Bureau has developed a series of charts illustrating trends in enrollment from 1947 to the present. These include the distribution of school enrollment by level from 1955 forward, trends in college enrollment by sex and by race, and dropout rates of students in 10th through 12th grades. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/hhes/school/data/cps/historical/index.html>. The tables provide information by age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, family income, type of college, employment status, nativity, foreign-born parentage, attendance status (full or part time), control of school (public or private), and vocational course enrollment. They explore issues such as nursery school and kindergarten enrollment, the likelihood of being enrolled below modal grade, and the percentage of young adults enrolled in college. The statistics are produced from the October School Enrollment Supplement to the Current Population Survey; historical tables are provided. 
Internet addresses: Main page: <https://www.census.gov/hhes/school/index.html>
and Tables: <https://www.census.gov/hhes/school/data/cps/2011/tables.html>. Tomorrow, the Census Bureau will release two short reports from the 2011 American Community Survey on the relationship between field of bachelor's degree, earnings and other characteristics, along with an associated infographic. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### MANN v. BELL.

No. 38603.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 221 So.2d 244.
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Certified Public Accountant


Board of Directors
Highlands Bankshares, Inc.


   We consent to the use of our report, dated January 15, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. as of December 31,
1997 and 1996, and the related statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 1997, which report appears on page 23 in the December 31, 1997
Annual Report to Shareholders of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. and page 45 of this
10KSB.


                                        S. B. HOOVER & COMPANY, L.L.P.





Harrisonburg, VA
March 26, 1998
#### Charles BUCHANAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-377.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. .Gen. and William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sheridan Weinstein, Legal Intern, for ap-pellee.

Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The court has carefully reviewed the record and briefs and considered same. No reversible error having been made to appear, it is ordered the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
# C_2013130EN.01000101.xml

| 7.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6293 — Thermo Fisher/Phadia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 130/01

On 18 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6293. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6293. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2012276EN.01001001.xml

| 13.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/10

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

2012/C 276/07

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| — | EPSO/AD/244/12 — Croatian administrators (AD 5) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/244/12 — Croatian administrators (AD 5)

| — | EPSO/AD/245-246/12 — Heads of unit (AD 9/AD 12) in the field of translation having Croatian as their main language |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/245-246/12 — Heads of unit (AD 9/AD 12) in the field of translation having Croatian as their main language

The competition notices are published in Official Journal C 276 A of 13 September 2012 in English, French and German only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://www.eu-careers.info

---
#### Elmer WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-470.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1973.

Wallace, Kreutzer & Breslow and Alexander L. Martone, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian and William L. Rogers, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Elmer Watson was convicted by a jury of first degree murder and was sentenced by the trial court to life imprisonment. His major point on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant a mistrial following an allegedly prejudicial outburst in the courtroom during the course of the trial.

The evidence adduced at trial reveals that the fatal shooting of Archibold Pinder occurred after the defendant entered the deceased’s print shop and asked Pinder if he could borrow a sum of money. The shooting occurred after Pinder refused to make the loan. It is admitted that the defendant shot the deceased. The only question is whether the shooting was accidental. From testimony given at defendant’s trial the jury was made aware of a previous unsuccessful attempt by defendant to borrow money from the deceased a few days before the shooting occurred. Immediately following the first refusal, defendant threatened Pin-der by saying in part, “One of these days I going to have to kill you . . .”

During defendant’s trial, while the prosecutor was giving his closing argument to the jury, a bystander in the courtroom screamed, “He killed two people and he’s not going to get away with this one.” Immediately after this disturbance the demonstrator was removed from the courtroom and the trial judge polled the jury to determine whether the jurors had been prejudiced by this outburst thereby denying de*408fendant’s right to a fair trial. All of the jurors affirmatively stated that they were not influenced and that they could remain fair and impartial. Defendant moved for a mistrial based upon prejudice accruing to defendant as a result of this incident, but this motion was denied.

It has long been recognized in Florida jurisprudence that the granting or denial of a motion for mistrial is a matter within the discretion of the trial judge. Hoover v. State, Fla.App.197l, 252 So.2d 872; Reis v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 666; McCoy v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 588; Garcia v. State, Fla.App.1962, 142 So.2d 318. On review of the record on appeal we find that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the defense motion for a mistrial. Goodman v. State ex rel. Furlong, Fla.1971, 247 So.2d 47; Adkins v. Smith, Fla.1967, 205 So.2d 530.

We have examined defendant’s remaining points on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.