alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Charles E. Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transpro, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 18, 2004                      /s/ Charles E. Johnson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles E. Johnson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       21
```
**Exhibit 99c**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ContinentalMaterials Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Joseph J. Sum, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| March 28, 2003 |   |                                       |
|----------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|           |   |                                       |
|           | By:    | /s/   Joseph J. Sum                   |   |
|           |   | Joseph J. Sum                              |
|           |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### SOUTHERN HOME INSURANCE CO. v. MANHATTAN FIRE & MARINE INS. CO.

No. 39238.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 691.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                         106,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,347,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,478,700
<PP&E>                                       6,917,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,683,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,681,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,323,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,400
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,752,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,681,300
<SALES>                                      2,222,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,637,300
<CGS>                                        3,854,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,482,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,418,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,279,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,279,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,279,800)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLARK EMMANUEL MEAD, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 813 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# C_2012238EN.01000101.xml

| 8.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6651 — Goldman Sachs/William C. Young/Plastipak Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 238/01

On 2 August 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6651. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6651. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHI NGTON, D.C. 20460 

MAR 2 2 2016 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Bjorn Skattberg 

FrigadonAB 

K vamdalsvagen 12 

SE-30241 

Halmstad, Sweden 

Re: Complete Determination of SNAP Submission for R-1270 (Propylene) in Chillers 

(Commercial Comfort Air Conditioning) and Cold Storage Warehouses 

Dear Mr. Skattberg: 

Thank you for Frigadon AB's submission to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) 

Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. The EPA established the SNAP program 

to implement section 612 ofthe Clean Air Act. Your application submitted on February 26, 

2015, and the additional information you provided on June 24, 2015, have been reviewed for 

completeness. We find the submission to be complete. 

Here is a summary of information concerning your submission: 

Substitute name: R-1270 (Propylene) 

Sector: Refrigeration and Air Conditioning 

End-uses: Chillers (Commercial Comfort Air Conditioning); Cold Storage Warehouses 

New or Retrofit usage: New Equipment 

Date received: February 26, 2015 

Date of most recent information received: June 24, 2015 

Status of submission: Complete 

Your submission was complete as of October 16, 2015. You may sell and import R-1270 in the 

United States in the refrigeration and air conditioning end-uses listed above as of January 14, 

2016, pending EPA's fmal decision. Please note that this is not the same as a determination that 

the substitute is acceptable; such a final determination can only be made in a notice or rule 

1 

Internet Address (URL ) • http //www epa gov 

Recycled/Recyc lable • Pnnted w1th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper 
published in the Federal Register. If you have questions about your submission, please contact 

me at (202) 564-7768 or Farguharson.chenise@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

~~~ Chenise Farquharson 

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch 

Stratospheric Protection Division 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1954 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1954

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on 
    supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in 
        critical access and small rural hospitals through 2014.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION ON SUPERVISION 
              REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTPATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN 
              CRITICAL ACCESS AND SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS THROUGH 2014.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall continue to apply 
through calendar year 2014 the enforcement instruction described in the 
notice of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services entitled 
``Enforcement Instruction on Supervision Requirements for Outpatient 
Therapeutic Services in Critical Access and Small Rural Hospitals for 
CY 2013'', dated November 1, 2012 (providing for an exception to the 
restatement and clarification under the final rulemaking changes to the 
Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system and calendar 
year 2009 payment rates (published in the Federal Register on November 
18, 2008, 73 Fed. Reg. 68702 through 68704) with respect to 
requirements for direct supervision by physicians for therapeutic 
hospital outpatient services).

            Passed the Senate February 10, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1954

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on 
    supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in 
        critical access and small rural hospitals through 2014.
```
#### The GENERAL DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION, Appellant, v. DEERFIELD BEACH BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, formerly Deerfield Beach Bank, a Florida banking corporation, Edmund L. MacDonald and Edith M. MacDonald, his wife, Hugh D. Stillman and Harold M. Kercheval, Appellees. The GENERAL DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION, Appellant, v. DEERFIELD BEACH BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, formerly Deerfield Beach Bank, a Florida banking corporation, Edmund L. MacDonald and Edith M. MacDonald, his wife, and Julian M. Bing, Appellees.

Nos. 1932, 1933.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 29, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 
32.3.1  Certification Required Under Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, John D. McMahon, the Chief Executive Officer of Orange and Rockland
Utilities, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 2003, which this statement accompanies, (the Form
10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ John D. McMahonJohn D. McMahonDated:  March 29, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1922 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1922

  To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prevent the illegal 
 trafficking of supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits by 
requiring all program beneficiaries to show valid photo identification 
              when purchasing items with program benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 14, 2014

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prevent the illegal 
 trafficking of supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits by 
requiring all program beneficiaries to show valid photo identification 
              when purchasing items with program benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Food Stamp Fraud Prevention and 
Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. PHOTO IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Disqualification for Using Another EBT Card.--Section 6 of the 
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2015) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(r) Disqualification for Using Another EBT Card.--Subject to any 
requirements established by the Secretary, any person who has been 
found by a State or Federal court or administrative agency in a hearing 
under subsection (b) to have intentionally used an EBT card that was 
issued to a household of which the person is not a member shall be 
ineligible for benefits under this Act.''.
    (b) Optional Photographic Identification.--Section 7(h)(9) of the 
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2016(h)(9)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Listed beneficiaries.--
                            ``(i) In general.--If a State agency elects 
                        not to require that an EBT card contain a 
                        photograph described in subparagraph (A), the 
                        State agency shall list on the EBT card the 
                        name of each member of the household who may 
                        use the card.
                            ``(ii) Photographic identification 
                        required.--A member of a household with an EBT 
                        card issued by a State agency described in 
                        clause (i) shall be required to show 
                        photographic identification at the point of 
                        sale when using the EBT card.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Cecil A. MOORE, Appellant, v. Hugh F. PURVIS et al., Appellees.

No. 66-231.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 10, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1967.

Holladay & Gardner and John M. Thomson, Miami, for appellant.

Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment dismissing his amended complaint. The complaint was in three counts. Counts one and two urged a breach of contract and negligent performance of contract, respectively. The order of dismissal must be affirmed as to these counts upon the rule stated in Sickler v. Indian River Abstract & Guaranty Co., 142 Fla. 528, 195 So. 195 (1940). Appellant’s count three charges fraud, but no facts to support fraud were alleged. See Rule 1.9(b), Fla.R.Civ.P., 30 F.S.A. The allegations were entirely by the conclusion of the pleader.

Appellant’s second point, which urges that he should have been allowed to file another amended complaint, is without merit. See Matson v. Tip Top Grocery Co., 151 Fla. 247, 9 So.2d 366, 368 (1942).

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0414 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANDREW JAMES McCURDY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 11 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 4 2023

08/04/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0414
No. 11115.

#### Caldwell *v.*Minelli et al.

Decided December 14, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court *533of Pickawáy couniy. *Mr. S. L. Patterson*and *Mr. Charles H. May,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Abernethy & Folsom,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
O ST, 4 .

) UNITEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION
IX 14

C’ PRO

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105.3901

OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR APR132011 Mary D. Nichols, Chairman California Air Resources Board 1001

1 Street P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 RE: Exceptional event requests regarding exceedances
of the 1-hour ozone NA4QS

at Folsom, California

in the Sacramento 1-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Dear Ms. Nichols: This letter responds
to ARB’s submittal regarding the 1-hour ozoneNational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) exceedances

atthe Folsom monitor
in Sacramento County on June 23, June 27, and July 10, 2008. ARB has requested that EPA exclude these exceedances from consideration when making regulatory decisions since they are directly due to exceptional events. Our response
toARB’s request
is governed by the “Treatment
of Data Influenced
by Exceptional Events” rule (72 FR 13560, March 22, 2007). After careffil consideration

of the information provided, weconcurwith the State’s flags. The basis for ourdecision

is setforth in the enclosed document. EPA’s decisions on exceptional event exclusions arenot considered final agencyaction until they areacted uponas partof afinal regulatory action, such asin anaction concluding that the affected data maybe excluded from usein a designation

ordetermination

of attainment, which
is subject to public notice and comment.
if youhave any questions
orwish to discuss this matter further, please have yourstaff contact Deborah Jordan, Director of the Air I)ivision

at (415) 947-8715. Sincerely, Enclosure cc:See next page

Printed on Recycled Papercc: James Goldstene, Executive Officer, California Air Resources Board Mike Applegarth, Interim Air Pollution Control Officer, El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District Tom Christofk, Air Pollution Control Officer, Placer County Air Pollution Control District Mat Ehrhardt, Air Pollution Control Officer, Yolo-Solano Air Quality Managemeht District Larry Greene, Air Pollution Control Officer, Sacramento Air Quality Management District David Valler, Air Pollution Control Officer, Feather River Air Quality Management District
Advanced Flight Maneuvers (* * * ) 

EJ Fly a 4 point square box clockwise and rotate the 

phantom in the dir&c:tion of travel. 

r----,.._---'""', , ' - ...._.. • 1 / - --"yiiil: ~~r- • 41' 

/, \ , ' , ' , ' 

. ------....,..----------· 

D Fly e circle counter-clockwise end keep the camera pointed 

in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the altitude the 

same end the circle ea uniform as possible. 

[J Fly a circle counter-clockwise with the camera pointed at the 

center ofthe circle. Be sure to keep the altitude the same 

and the circle as uniform as possible. 
Advanced Flight Maneuvers <* * *) 

iJ Fly a figure 8 without rotating the Phantom. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

[J Fly a Figure 8 with the camera of the Phantom pointed in the 

direction of travel. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and 

the circle as uniform as possible. 

r.'W Fly Figure 8 patterns wftile experimenting with different orientations. 

U For example, camera alwaya pointed in a given direction or opposite/ 

left/right the direction of travel, etc. Be aure to keep the altitude the 

Mme and the circle as uniform as poi'.Sible. 
Emergency Situations 

II Return Home a Land Mode 

Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, 

make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED 

indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom at least 50ft 

away from your take off point Tum off the Remote Controller. 

The Phantom will enter it's failsafe Return· To-Home Mode. 

let the Phantom finish it • a routine and land itself within 2 metenJ 

of the take off point 

15 meters 

Intercepting Return Home a Land Mode 

Be sure you are in a large open area. Bafore you take off, make 

sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators 

are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom 50ft away from your take 

off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. The Phantom will 

enter it's failsafe Return· T o·Home Mode. When the Phantom 

is returning home, you can intercept RTH Mode by switching 

the Sl Switch from the top position to the middle or lower 

position, then continue flying the Phantom. 

-=v -- -- .. 

• , 15 meters 
www.dji.com