alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1







35 Wilbur Street Associates, LLC


19 Wilbur Street


Lynbrook, NY 11563







November 1, 2016







Mr. Thomas Wegman


Advance Biofactures Corp.


35 Wilbur Street


Lynbrook, NY 11563








	
Re:

	
Lease dated November 21, 2013 between 35 Wilbur Street Assoc., LLC and Advance Biofactures Corp., premises; 35 Wilbur Street, Lynbrook, NY 11563.












Dear Mr. Wegman:







It is our understanding that you would like to renew the lease.  The current lease expires on November 30, 2016. We propose that the current terms of the lease remain in effect except where the following is concerned:








	
1)

	
The landlord will take occupancy of additional warehouse space in the rear of the building as discussed and agreed.








	
2)

	
The lease will be renewed for 1 (one) year at the rate of $129,082 annually. $10,756.83/ month.








	
3)

	
This will be less 14.89% of the utilities.








	
4)

	
The proposed warehouse space must be delivered to the landlord empty and broom clean.








	
5)

	
The Tenant has the option to cancel this lease, without penalty, by providing the Landlord with three (3) months prior notice at any time during the Term of this lease.












A current copy of the certificate of liability insurance is included.







Sincerely yours,


 


Valorie Mancuso


Controller


 


	
Thomas Wegman, President

	
 

	Richard Arote
	
Advance Biofactures Corp.

	
 

	35 Wilbur Street Assoc., LLC
	 	 	 
	
/S/ Thomas Wegman

	 	
/S/ Richard Arote





 



	
State of New York

	
 

	ss:
	
County of Nassau

	 	 



On this           1st           day of November , 2015, before me personally came,           Thomas Wegman          to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the President of Advance Biofactures Corp. and that he signed his name thereto by authority of the board of directors.










	
/S/ Helen L. Piazza
# C_2012234EN.01000501.xml

| 4.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 August 2012

2012/C 234/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2245 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 95,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4415 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78745 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,2797 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2012 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3700 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,285 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0892 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6470 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1897 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,1649 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2282 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4958 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5038 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5255 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 388,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1149 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8031 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5252 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 597,39 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8277 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,104 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,657 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5018 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2603 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,2720 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2245

JPY

Japanese yen

95,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4415

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78745

SEK

Swedish krona

8,2797

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2012

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3700

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,285

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0892

RON

Romanian leu

4,6470

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1897

AUD

Australian dollar

1,1649

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2282

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4958

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5038

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5255

KRW

South Korean won

1 388,56

ZAR

South African rand

10,1149

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8031

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5252

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 597,39

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8277

PHP

Philippine peso

51,104

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6850

THB

Thai baht

38,657

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5018

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2603

INR

Indian rupee

68,2720

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### OLD EQUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Joseph SUSIN, Appellee.

No. 67-213.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 28, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1967.

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl and James Knight, Miami, for appellant.

Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Holland v. Gross, Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 255, 63 A.L.R.2d 920; In re Baldridge’s Estate, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 658.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Croff Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald L. Jensen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
   (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) I
further certify to the best of my knowledge that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.
  
 
 Date:
April 30,
2008                                                                         By  /s/ Gerald L.
Jensen
 Gerald L. Jensen,
 Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                        AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31,
                                                           1999          1998
                                                        ----------    ----------
<S>                                                     <C>           <C>       
Net earnings .......................................    $  173,000    $1,185,000
                                                        ==========    ==========

Common shares outstanding at beginning of period ...     6,475,069     6,452,904

    Effect of shares issued during the period ......            --         4,322
                                                        ----------    ----------

Basic weighted average common shares ...............     6,475,069     6,457,226

Incremental shares from assumed conversions:

    Stock options ..................................         2,782       163,520
    Warrants .......................................            --        28,494
                                                        ----------    ----------

Diluted weighted average common shares .............     6,477,851     6,649,240
                                                        ==========    ==========

    Basic earnings per share .......................    $     0.03    $     0.18

    Diluted earnings per share .....................    $     0.03    $     0.18
</TABLE>
**Exhibit15**

To the Board of DirectorsandShareholders of Investors Financial Services Corp.

We have reviewed, inaccordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States), the unaudited consolidated interim financial information of InvestorsFinancial Services Corp. andsubsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, as indicated in ourreport dated May 2, 2007; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed noopinion on that information.

We are aware that ourreport referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, is incorporated by reference in thefollowing Registration Statements:

Files on Form S-8:

Registration Statement No. 333-131145

Registration Statement No. 333-72786

Registration Statement No. 333-79639

RegistrationStatement No. 333-43353

Files on Form S-3:

Registration Statement No. 333-54830

Registration Statement No. 333-51278

Registration Statement No. 333-76885

Registration Statement No. 333-61951

RegistrationStatement No. 333-58031

We also are aware that theaforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared orcertified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountantwithin the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE& TOUCHE LLP

May 2, 2007

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board, August 14, 2018, 1:00 p.m. to August 14, 2018, 4:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Conference Room TE406, Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 02, 2018, 83 FR 37820.                

The meeting notice is being amended to change the meeting times for the open and closed sessions. The open session will be held from 1:00 p.m. to 3:45 p.m. The closed session will be held from 3:50 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: August 6, 2018.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-17104 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF REGISTRANT**

 

Registrant has no parent; see proxy statement for Registrant’sprincipal shareholders.  The followingare Registrant’s subsidiaries included in the consolidated financialstatements:

 
| **Name  of Subsidiary  (Each Owned 100% by Registrant  Except as Otherwise Stated)** | ** ** | **State or Other  Jurisdiction  of Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                 |       |                                               |
| Castle  Concrete Company                                                             |       | Colorado                                           |
| Continental  Catalina, Inc.*                                                    |       | Arizona                                            |
| Continental  Copper, Inc.                                                       |       | Arizona                                            |
| Edens  Industrial Park, Inc.                                                    |       | Illinois                                           |
| McKinney  Door and Hardware, Inc.                                               |       | Colorado                                           |
| Phoenix  Manufacturing, Inc.                                                    |       | Arizona                                            |
| Rocky  Mountain Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. (Sold July 17, 2009)              |       | Colorado                                           |
| Transit  Mix Concrete Co.                                                            |       | Colorado                                           |
| Transit  Mix of Pueblo, Inc.                                                    |       | Colorado                                           |
| Williams  Furnace Co.                                                                |       | Delaware                                           |

 

----

* owned by Continental Copper, Inc.

 

----
#### MOULIN ROUGE MOTEL, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Rose Ann ABRAMS, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Harry Abraham Abrams, Appellees.

No. 72-549.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 8, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE EARNINGS STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  THIS FINANCIAL
DATA SCHEDULE IS RESTATED DUE TO THE CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING STANDARD
FOR EARNINGS PER SHARE (SFAS 128). 
</LEGEND> 
<RESTATED>  
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996 
<CASH>                                             641 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,800 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        95 
<INVENTORY>                                      1,012 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,895 
<PP&E>                                           6,261 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,659 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,173 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,503 
<BONDS>                                            567<F1> 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                        287 
<COMMON>                                             5 
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,949 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,173 
<SALES>                                          7,176 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,286 
<CGS>                                            2,116 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,116 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,266<F2> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    838 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       276 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                562 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       562 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07 
<FN> 
<F1>EXCLUDES COMPANY'S GUARANTEE OF ESOP DEBT: 256 
<F2>ONLY INCLUDES R&D EXPENSE. 
</FN> 
        


</TABLE>
#### KEYSTONE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Zula JACOBS et al., Respondents.

No. 37223.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 15, 1968.

Jesse F. Sparks, Jr., of Gurney, Gurney & Handley, Orlando, for petitioners.

Irvin A. Meyers, of Meyers, Mooney & Langston, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 25, 1968.

*219We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied. The motion for respondents’ attorney’s fee is granted in the sum of $250.00.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ-, concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

NANCY FERNANDEZ

- GRAHAM,

Appellant,

v.

KENNETH GRAHAM,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00198

- CV

Appeal from the

456th Judicial District Court

of Guadalupe County, Texas

(TC# 18

- 1579

- CV

- A)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant ’ s unopposed motion to dismiss the

appeal and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed

. We

therefore dismiss the appeal

. We further order Appellant pay all costs of this appeal, and this

decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 2 N D DAY OF AUGUST , 20 23

.

Y VONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, J.J.
# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 12-5287 September Term, 2013 1: 06-c v -007 42-RWT Filed O n: Jan uary 15, 201 4 Dianne D. Sle dge, Co-p erson al rep resen tative of the Esta te o f

Rico W ood land , etal., App ellant s
v . Fede ral Bure au of

Prisons, App ellee
BEFORE: Kavana ugh, Circuit Ju dge; S ent elle a nd Rand olph , Se nior Circuit

Judges O R D E R Upon con siderat ion o f

the cou rt’s order t o sh ow cause f iled Dece mb er 13 , 20 13, and the respo nse the reto, it is ORDERED tha t th e o rder to sho w cau se b e d ischarged. It is FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e se aled op inion f iled Dece mb er 13 , 20 13, be unse aled . T he Clerk is directed to unse al th e o pinion an d issue it pu blicly . Itis FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e reco rd m ate rial f iled u nde r seal in the Joint App end ix

at JA 2 10-9 37 rema in un der se al.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Jenn ifer M. Clark Depu ty Cl erk
#### BERTRAM YACHT YARD, Appellant, v. Daniel BURNS and the Home Insurance Co., Appellees.

No. 73-885.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 5, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

REAFFIRMATION AGREEMENT 

November 7, 2016 
 Reference is made to
that certain Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2013 (the “Amended and Restated Management Agreement”) by and between Global Indemnity (Cayman) Limited (“GBLI Cayman”)
and Fox Paine & Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Fox Paine”), such agreement amending and restating the original Management Agreement, dated September 5, 2003 (the “Original Management
Agreement”). 
 Reference is made to that certain Guaranty (the “Guaranty”), executed by the undersigned
(“Guarantor”) in favor of Fox Paine to guaranty GBLI Cayman’s obligations under the Original Management Agreement. 
 Reference
is made to that certain Reaffirmation Agreement, executed October 31, 2013, wherein the Guarantor agreed and confirmed that all terms of the Guaranty continue to apply to the Amended and Restated Management Agreement. 

Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Guaranty. 

This reaffirmation agreement (this “Agreement”) is delivered in connection with the letter agreement dated November 7, 2016 from Fox Paine
regarding the assignment of the Amended and Restated Management Agreement from GBLI Cayman to Global Indemnity Limited (“New GBLI Parent”) and the assumption of the Amended and Restated Management Agreement by New GBLI Parent
(the “Letter Agreement”). The Letter Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 
 The undersigned Guarantor hereby consents to
the terms of the Letter Agreement and agrees that the terms of the Guaranty continue to apply to the Amended and Restated Management Agreement, all of which obligations and liabilities shall remain in full force and effect and each of which is
hereby reaffirmed and remain in full force and effect. The Guarantor further acknowledges and agrees that any payments, liabilities and obligations, however arising, owed by New GBLI Parent to Fox Paine of every kind and description (whether or
not evidenced by any note, instrument or agreement and whether or not for the payment of money), direct or indirect, absolute or contingent, due or to become due, now existing or hereafter arising pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated
Management Agreement and any costs of collection hereunder, including without limitation, attorneys’ and other professionals’ fees, shall be Obligations under the Guaranty. 

The undersigned Guarantor hereby confirms that no amendments to the Guaranty are intended hereby. 

(The remainder of the page has been intentionally left blank) 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

  

			
	GLOBAL INDEMNITY GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas M. McGeehan

		 	Name: Thomas M. McGeehan
		 	Title: Chief Financial Officer


 [Signature Page to Reaffirmation Agreement]
Order filed March 8 , 20 12

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 11

- 00 925

- CV

____________

EXTERRA ENERGY, INC. , Appellant

V.

SHAREWELL ENERGY SERVICES, LP , Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008

- 32032



### O R D E R

Appellant = s brief was due January 26 , 20 12

. No brief or motion for extension of

time has been filed.

Unless appellant files a brief with the c lerk of this c ourt on or before March 26

,

20 12

, the c ourt will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(b).

PER CURIAM