alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Mellor Willie

### Executive Director, National American Indian Housing Council

Mellor C. Willie is the Executive Director of the National American Indian Housing Council (NAIHC). He directs the non-profit organization's operations and programming, as well as publicly promotes and advances the American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian housing policy agenda in Washington, D.C. and abroad. 

Mellor is a member of the Navajo Nation, born and raised in Window Rock, Arizona. He was born into the Yei Dine' Tachii'nii clan and born for the Tsenahabilnii clan. In 1998, he received his bachelor's degree in political science from Southern Utah University. As a 1998 Udall intern, Mellor worked for former Congressman Jim Kolbe (R-AZ). In May 2009, he graduated from The George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management, being the first American Indian to graduate from the program. 

Before NAIHC, Mellor served as director of development for the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) headquartered in Washington, D.C. As the chief fundraising executive, he directed the fundraising efforts for NCAI. Mellor served on the faculty advisory board for the Harvard University Native American Program and as a former alumnus, he continues to serve on the advisory board for the Washington Internships for Native Students at American University. 

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### James S. ARCENEAUX v. Drew DOMINGUE, Jimmy Beard, and Allstate Insurance Company.

No. 62446.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: James S. Arceneaux, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Lafayette.

Writ Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5  
<LEGEND>  
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED  
FROM THE EARNINGS STATEMENT AND THE BALANCE SHEET AND IS  
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL  
STATEMENTS.  THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS RESTATED DUE TO THE
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING STANDARD FOR EARNINGS PER SHARE (SFAS 128). 
</LEGEND>  
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000  
         
<S>                             <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997  
<CASH>                                             926  
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,440  
<ALLOWANCES>                                        94  
<INVENTORY>                                        962  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,491  
<PP&E>                                           5,881  
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,586  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,487  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,245  
<BONDS>                                            554<F1>  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                        283  
<COMMON>                                             5  
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,655  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,487  
<SALES>                                          4,889  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,987  
<CGS>                                            1,529  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,529  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   832<F2>  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    684  
<INCOME-TAX>                                       233  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                451  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                       451  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .87 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86 
<FN>  
<F1>DOES NOT INCLUDE GUARANTEE OF ESOP DEBT OF 240.  
<F2>ONLY INCLUDES R&D EXPENSE.  
</FN>  
        


</TABLE>
No. 12029.

#### The City of Cincinnati *v.*DuBruhl.

Decided January 18, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Plamilton county.

*Mr. Edzvard M. Ballard,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Dudley V. Sutphin,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. A. W. Bruck*and *Mr. P. S. Phillips,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2012396EN.01001601.xml

| 21.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 396/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 396/16

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 December 2012

2012/C 396/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3246 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4612 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81460 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6349 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2079 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3645 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,228 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 286,13 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0730 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4743 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3670 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2632 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3106 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2657 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5882 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6148 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 423,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2790 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2554 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5333 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 786,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0473 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,424 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6570 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,559 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7308 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9287 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,6740 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3246

JPY

Japanese yen

111,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4612

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81460

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6349

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2079

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3645

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,228

HUF

Hungarian forint

286,13

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0730

RON

Romanian leu

4,4743

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3670

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2632

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3106

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2657

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5882

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6148

KRW

South Korean won

1 423,62

ZAR

South African rand

11,2790

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2554

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5333

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 786,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0473

PHP

Philippine peso

54,424

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6570

THB

Thai baht

40,559

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7308

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9287

INR

Indian rupee

72,6740

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136946 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136946 

 COA: 277902 

Oakland CC: 2006-209811-FC 

BRADLEY STEVEN CAREY,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit23(a)**

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

**DPL Inc.:**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-44370) onForm S-3, and Registration Statement (No. 333-39982) on Form S-8 andRegistration Statement (No. 333-139348) on Form S-8 of DPL Inc. andSubsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated February 22, 2007, with respectto the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and2005, and the related consolidated statements of results of operations,shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2006, and all related financial statement schedules,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.  Our report refers to a change in the methodof accounting for share-based payments and pension and other postretirementbenefit obligations in 2006.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP          |   |   |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                  |   |   |   |
| KPMG LLP              |   |   |   |
| Kansas City, Missouri |   |   |   |
| February 22, 2007     |   |   |   |

 

1

----
No. 11338.

#### Cellarius et al. *v.*Schleinitz et al.

Decided November 30, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Montgomery county.

*Mr. O. F. Davisson*and *Mr. W. FI. FI. Ecki,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. I. W. Kreitzcr*and *Messrs. McMahon & McMahon,*for defendants in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.

Summers, Davis, Shaucic and Price, JJ.,- concur.
COURT OF CHANCERY

OF THE

STATE OF DELAWARE

A NDRE G. B OUCHARD

C HANCELLOR L EONARD L. W ILLIAMS J USTICE C ENTER

500 N. K ING S TREET

, S UITE 11400

W ILMINGTON

, D ELAWARE 19801

- 3734

November 27 , 2019

Kevin R. Shannon, Esquire

Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP

1313 North Market Street

Wilmington, DE 19801

Jennifer C. Voss, Esquire

Skadden Arps Slate Meagher

& Flom LLP

920 North King Street, 7th Floor

Wilmington, DE 19801 Jeremy D. Eicher, Esquire

Eicher Law LLC

1007 North Orange Street, 4th Floor

Wilmington, DE 19801

Frank E. Noyes, II, Esquire

Offit Kurman, P.A.

1201 N. Orange Suite, Suite 10E

Wilmington, DE 19801

RE: In re: TransPerfect Global, Inc.

Civil Action No. 9700

- CB

Elizabeth Elting v. Philip R. Shawe, et al.

Civil Action No. 10449

- CB

Dear Counsel:

Pending before the court is the second motion for certification of an

interlocutory appeal that Respondents have filed within the past thirty days . This

time, Respondents seek to appeal two orders the court entered on November 1, 2019

(the “Second Orders”) arising out of the same disput e that w as the subject of a

Memorandum Opinion (“Opinion”) and Order (the “First Order”) issued on October

17, 2019

.In re TransPerfect Global, Inc., et al.

Civil A ction Nos. 9700, 10449

- CB

November 27, 2019

2 On November 18, 2019, the court den ied Respondents’ motion to certify an

interlocutory appeal of the Opinion and First Order (the “Interlocutory Order”)

. As

explained in the Interlocutory Order , “the risk of piecemeal appeals is manifest” in

this case. 1 For this reason, the court e xpressed its view that an interlocutory appeal

of the Opinion and the First Order and/ or of the Second O rders made no sense until

two other outstanding, directly

- related matters had been adjudicated , namely “ (i) the

amount of the Contempt Fee Award and (ii) the resolution of any objections

Respondents may make to the Fee Orders

. ” 2 Thereafter, a single interlocutory

appeal of all those rulings could be taken together

.

The court’s calculus of the costs versus the benefits of an interlocutory appeal

remains the same now as it did in the Interlocutory Order

. Accordingly, for the

reason s stated there, Respondents ’ motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal

of the Second Orders is DENIED.

I T IS SO ORDERED

.

Sincerely,

/s/ Andre G. Bouchard

Chancellor

AGB/gm

1 Dkt. 1410 ¶ 9.

2 Id. ¶¶ 9

- 10

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6091

WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Cumberland,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEPHEN EARL POLLARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:05-cv-01199-JCC)

Submitted: April 20, 2006 Decided: April 26, 2006

Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Earl Pollard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Earl Pollard, a federal prisoner, filed a

petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), raising claims under United

States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Although the district court

construed the § 2241 petition as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000), Pollard clearly intended to file a § 2241 petition. He

argued below that § 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the

legality of his detention and contended that his claims should be

considered in the context of his § 2241 petition. Because Pollard

does not meet the standard set forth in In re: Jones, 226 F.3d 328,

333-34 (4th Cir. 2000), we affirm the denial of relief. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
FORM
OF 


 


SUBSCRIPTION
AGREEMENT


 


GADSDEN
GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.


 


Dated
as of _______, 2016


 


1.
The undersigned hereby subscribes to ___________ (____) shares (“Shares”) of common stock, par value of
one cent ($0.01) per share, of Gadsden Growth Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
“Corporation”). Payment therefor will be made in cash at the price of fifty cents ($0.50) per share by
check or wire transfer.


 


2.
The Shares will be issued on the date of this agreement and when issued, shall be fully paid and non-assessable.


 


3.
The undersigned subscriber hereby:


 


3.1
Acknowledges that the Shares are part of the initial capitalization of the Corporation;


 


3.2
Acknowledges that the undersigned has been advised that the Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the “Act”), and, accordingly, that the undersigned may not be able to sell or otherwise
dispose of the Shares when the undersigned wishes to do so;


 


3.3
Represents and warrants that the Shares are being purchased by the undersigned for the undersigned’s own sole benefit
and account for investment and not with a view to, or for resale in connection with, a public offering or distribution
thereof;


 


3.4
Agrees that the Shares will not be resold (a) without registration thereof under the Act (unless an exemption from such
registration is available) or (b) in violation of any law; and


 


3.5
Consents that the certificate or certificates representing the Shares may be impressed with a legend indicating that the
Shares are not registered under the Act and reciting that transfer thereof is restricted.


 


[Signatures
to Follow]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned subscriber and the Corporation have each duly executed and delivered this Subscription Agreement
as of the date first written above.


 


	 	SUBSCRIBER
	 	 	 
	 	Signature:	                      
	 	Name:	 


 


	 	GADSDEN
    GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	 John
    E. Hartman
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer


 


[Signature
page - Gadsden Growth Properties, Inc. - Subscription Agreement]


 




    	2
Document

EXHIBIT 10.2

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE
CATERPILLAR INC.
2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


Caterpillar Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Caterpillar Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive (the “Plan”).  The Plan was originally approved by stockholders effective on June 11, 2014.  On June 14, 2014, stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the Plan that became effective on such date.  Pursuant to Section 5.2 of the Plan, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan, in whole or in part, at any time.  By a document dated October 16, 2019, the Company amended and restated the Plan.  By this instrument, the Company hereby further amends the Plan to reflect changes in the Company’s employee title structure by updating the references to the position with management responsibility for the Company’s compensation and benefits, or total rewards, function.
1.This First Amendment shall be effective as of July 1, 2022.


2.Section 5.4(b) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows:
“(b)    Nonqualified Stock Options and SARs (except for any Tandem SAR granted in tandem with an Incentive Stock Option), whether vested or unvested, held by (A) participants who are considered officers of the Company for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act; (B) participants who are Directors; or (C) any participants who previously held the positions in clauses (A) and (B) may be transferred by gift or by domestic relations order to one or more Permitted Transferees. Nonqualified Stock Options and SARs (except for any Tandem SAR granted in tandem with an Incentive Stock Option), whether vested or unvested, held by all other participants and by Permitted Transferees may be transferred by gift or by domestic relations order only to Permitted Transferees and, in the case of transfers other than in connection with a domestic relations order, upon the prior written approval of the Company's Vice President Total Rewards.”


3.This First Amendment amends only the provisions of the Plan as set forth herein, and those provisions not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and effect.  
			
	Caterpillar: Confidential Green


8576654








Notwithstanding the foregoing, this First Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions and the intent of this First Amendment.
* * * * *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of this 			
	9/6/2022

.




    CATERPILLAR INC.




			
	/s/ Cheryl Johnson





			
	Caterpillar: Confidential Green



2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,391                  44,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,686                  54,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,794                 133,826
<PP&E>                                         394,059                 430,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,801                   6,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,016,076               1,056,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          388,485                 181,194
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          110,000                 110,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           366                     369
<OTHER-SE>                                     351,481                 353,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,016,078               1,056,536
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               178,923                 185,333
<CGS>                                          132,932                 141,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,533                 167,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,562                   6,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,576                  14,670
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,437                   6,224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,139                   8,446
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                    (195)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,139                   8,251
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28                    0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27                    0.22


</TABLE>