alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012307EN.01000201.xml

| 11.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 October 2012

2012/C 307/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2889 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4582 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80495 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6068 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2110 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,950 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,15 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0825 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5710 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3375 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2574 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2594 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9922 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5732 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5833 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 436,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1516 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1210 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4920 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 385,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9623 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,470 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,582 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6199 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5624 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,3150 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2889

JPY

Japanese yen

100,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4582

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80495

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6068

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2110

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,950

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,15

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0825

RON

Romanian leu

4,5710

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3375

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2574

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2594

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9922

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5732

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5833

KRW

South Korean won

1 436,57

ZAR

South African rand

11,1516

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1210

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4920

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 385,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9623

PHP

Philippine peso

53,470

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0900

THB

Thai baht

39,582

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6199

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5624

INR

Indian rupee

68,3150

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Posey L. CUNDIFF v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39247.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 6, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 898.
260 La. 1122

#### Omelia LaFitte Normand POSTON v. FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, et al. FIREMEN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 52195.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1972.

In re: Firemen’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 256 So.2d 700.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Richard P. Dutkiewicz, as Chief FinancialOfficer and Principal Accounting Officer of New World Restaurant Group, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          the Quarterly Report ofthe Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 5, 2004 | By: /s/ RICHARD P. DUTKIEWICZ |
|---------------------|-------------------------------|
|                | Richard P. Dutkiewicz         |
|                | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                | Principal Accounting Officer  |

 

----
No. 11606.

#### Erie Railroad Co. *v.*Coulter.

Decided November 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana county.

*Messrs. Hine, Kennedy & Manchester*and *Messrs. Billingsley & Clark,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Charles A. Clark*and *Messrs. Potts Sr Wells,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           40593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2613
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 78089
<PP&E>                                          626414
<DEPRECIATION>                                  211330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  754090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           123276
<BONDS>                                         784033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        137386
<OTHER-SE>                                      468425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    754090
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                220870
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   225143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               91680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (95953)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (6800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (89153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (89153)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2026 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2026

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
  any prizes or awards won in competition in the Olympic Games or the 
                           Paralympic Games.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2014

    Mr. Thune (for himself, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Kirk, Mrs. 
  Gillibrand, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Hoeven, and Mr. Isakson) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
  any prizes or awards won in competition in the Olympic Games or the 
                           Paralympic Games.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MEDALS AND USOC PRIZE MONEY EXCLUDED 
              FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 74 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Exception for Olympic and Paralympic Medals and Prizes.--
Gross income shall not include the value of any medal awarded in, or 
any prize money received from the United States Olympic Committee on 
account of, competition in the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to prizes and awards received after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
Document



September 12, 2022




Nick Powell
Nick.powell@univarsolutions.com 


BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
RE: Extension of USA Working Assignment




Dear Nick:


This is an amendment (“Amendment”) to the letter agreement (“Letter Agreement”) between yourself and Univar Solutions Inc. (“Univar”), dated September 13, 2021, which set forth the details of your USA working Assignment that is currently underway.  If not defined herein, all capitalized words or phrases used in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Letter Agreement.


In pertinent part, the Letter Agreement states as follows:


“The intended length of the terms proposed in conjunction with this Assignment will not exceed twelve (12) months unless express written authorization to extend the Assignment is approved by the CEO and General Counsel of Univar Solutions.”


Following discussions between us, the term of your Assignment is hereby extended until December 31, 2022.  All other terms and conditions of the Letter Agreement remain unchanged.




The duly authorized representatives of the parties have executed this Amendment, whereupon it enters into full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


									
	UNIVAR SOLUTIONS INC	

	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
		

	
		

	
		

	
	/s/ David C. Jukes
	

	/s/ Nick Powell
	By: David C. Jukes	

	Nick Powell
	Title: President & CEO	

	Date: 15/09/2022

	Date: 9/19/2022	

	
		

	
		

	
	/s/ Noelle J. Perkins	

	
	By: Noelle J. Perkins	

	
	Title: SVP, General Counsel	

	
	Date: 9/19/2022
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNo. 333-85580 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 28, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph as to changes in accounting principles for pension and other postretirement benefit plansand purchases and sales of inventory with the same counterparty in 2006, and for conditional asset retirement obligations in 2005), relating to the consolidated financial statements of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (a wholly-owned subsidiary ofDominion Resources, Inc.), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Consolidated Natural Gas Company for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Richmond, Virginia 

February 28, 2007
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2732

_____________________________

PAUL BURNS,

Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

July 10, 2024

PER CURIAM.

The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance 

of appellate counsel on the merits. 

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and M.K. THOMAS and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Paul Burns, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

# **CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

# **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

# **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PacificNorthwest Bancorp (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filedon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick M. Fahey, President andChief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Dated:                                           | August 12, 2003 |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                             |
|   |                                             |
|   | /s/ Patrick M.  Fahey                            |            |
|   | Patrick M. Fahey                                 |
|   | Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### Samuel J. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-270.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 23, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 18, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender; and Brian T. Hayes, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Thomas B, Calhoun, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURTAM.

Appellant was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to be confined at hard labor for the term of six months to five years after a jury trial on charges of unlawful escape from confinement.

A careful study and consideration of the record on appeal, briefs and oral arguments of counsel in this case reveals that the evidence wás sufficient to sustain a conviction under the charge of escape. The facts constituted a jury question and was resolved by the jury adversely to appellant, and this court will not substitute its judgment therefor.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
# C_2012242EN.01000701.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 August 2012

2012/C 242/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2262 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 96,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4427 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78610 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,2077 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2009 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,2700 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,205 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0961 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5345 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1942 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,1661 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2192 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5121 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5162 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5296 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 386,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9772 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7989 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4865 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 632,35 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8222 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,261 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,1440 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,589 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4772 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1368 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,7900 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2262

JPY

Japanese yen

96,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4427

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78610

SEK

Swedish krona

8,2077

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2009

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,2700

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,205

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0961

RON

Romanian leu

4,5345

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1942

AUD

Australian dollar

1,1661

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2192

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5121

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5162

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5296

KRW

South Korean won

1 386,66

ZAR

South African rand

9,9772

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7989

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4865

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 632,35

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8222

PHP

Philippine peso

51,261

RUB

Russian rouble

39,1440

THB

Thai baht

38,589

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4772

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1368

INR

Indian rupee

67,7900

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11



                         SPEEDFAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND  1995
           (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                   Three Months
                                                      Ended
                                                    August 31,
                                                  ---------------
                                                    1996    1995
                                                  -------  ------
<S>                                               <C>       <C>
Net earnings                                      $ 4,038  $  704
                                                  =======  ======
Weighted average shares:

Common shares outstanding                          10,534   7,468
Common equivalent shares issuable upon
      exercise of employee stock options              743     780
                                                  -------  ------
Shares used in net earnings per share              11,277   8,248
                                                  =======  ======
Net earnings per share                            $   .36  $  .09
                                                  =======  ======

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: LOUIE CARBAJAL,

 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00238-CR

Appeal from the

346th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2019DCV2075)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until February 22, 2020. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Michael R. Gibson, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before February 22, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of January, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.

(Rodriguez, J., not participating)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. GERALD TRAVIS BUTERBAUGH, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 403 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 26th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-133-CV[APPEAL NO.]

CHARLES RANDOLPH SMITH[STYLE 1]	APPELLANT(S)

	V.

DETA YVONNE SMITH[STYLE 2]	APPELLEE(S)

	------------

	FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTYFROM (THE) [TRIAL COURT NAME] OF [TRIAL COURT COUNTY] COUNTYNO. 2-07-   -        158-CV

FiIlLoOmMeEnNoO GaArRcCiIaA, InNdDiIvViIdDuUaAlLlLyY aAnNdD d/b/a Garcia Painting Contractor	APPELLANT	

dD/bB/aA GaArRcCiIaA PaAiInNtTiInNgG CoOnNtTrRaAcCtToOrR

	V.

NiInNaA GoOnNzZaAlLeEsS	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 THE        DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT            COUNTY

	------------

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court’s  [DATE OF JUDGMENT]April 23, 2007 7  March 23, 2006 “[TITLE OF JUDGMENT]Final Default JudgmentFinal Decree of Divorce.”  The trial court subsequently granted appellant’s motion for new trial on July 9, 2007May 19, 2006, while it still had plenary jurisdiction over the case.  See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(e).

	On May 24, 2006 October 16, 2007, [DATE OF 10-DAY NOTICE], we informed the parties that it appeared the trial court’s granting of the motion for new trial rendered this appeal moot and that the appeal would be dismissed as moot unless, on or before June 5, 2006 Fridy, Oay, October 26, 2007, [DATE RESPONSE WAS DUE], any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  Appellant responded, agreeing that the appeal should be dismissed as moot. [OR Neither party filed a response.]

	Therefore, we dismiss the appeal as moot on our own motion.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). ; [OR Accordingly, on this court’s own motion, we dismiss the appeal as moot.  ;] sSee State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Smith, No. 02-03-00046-CV, 2003 WL 22071455, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 29, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D[PANEL LETTER] D:      DAUPHINOT, HOLDMMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.[PANEL MEMBERS] LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED:  March 30, 2006   [DELIVERED DATE]  November 7815, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.0

                            COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                              -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                1996          1995           1994             1993               1992
                                              --------      --------        --------        --------           --------
 <S>                                          <C>           <C>             <C>             <C>                <C>
 Interest Expense                             $142,100      $151,000        $ 73,300        $ 80,900           $ 92,500

 Estimated Interest Portion of
   Rent Expense (One-Third)                     17,362        16,865          19,289          20,701             16,178
                                              --------      --------        --------        --------           --------
 Fixed Charges                                $159,462      $167,865        $ 92,589        $101,601           $108,678
                                              ========      ========        ========        ========           ========

 Income From Continuing
   Operations Before Income Taxes             $558,000      $478,000        $504,700        $506,000           $392,100

 Add:       Fixed Charges                      159,462       167,865          92,589         101,601            108,678

            Dividends From Less Than
            50% Owned Companies                    359            968            835           2,395              2,278

 Less:      Equity in Earings of
            Less Than 50%
            Owned Companies                     (1,281)       (1,000)         (1,900)         (1,200)            (1,900)
                                              --------      --------        --------        --------           --------
 Earnings Before Fixed Charges                $716,540      $645,833        $596,224        $608,796           $501,156
                                              ========      ========        ========        ========           ========
 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges              4.5x         3.8x            6.4x            6.0x               4.6x
</TABLE>