alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  Second Quarter 2001 and 2000

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   Second quarter 2001


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.1       7.2       8.6      11.3       7.6
      For rent...........................      2.6       1.8       2.8       3.2       2.0
      For sale only......................      1.1       0.7       1.3       1.2       0.9
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.6       0.9       0.9       0.8
      Held off market....................      4.6       4.0       3.6       6.0       3.9
        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.3       0.6       2.2       1.7
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.9       0.9       1.0       0.6
        For other reasons................      2.2       1.8       2.1       2.7       1.6

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.1       4.0       3.0       3.0       2.6

    Occupied.............................     87.8      88.8      88.4      85.7      89.8




                                                   Second quarter 2000

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      8.9       7.8       7.8      11.1       7.4
      For rent...........................      2.5       2.0       2.3       3.2       2.2
      For sale only......................      0.9       0.7       0.8       1.1       0.8
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.7       0.7       0.8       0.8       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.7       4.3       3.9       6.0       3.8
        For occasional use...............      1.7       1.5       0.7       2.4       1.7
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      1.0       0.8       1.2       1.1       0.7
        For other reasons................      2.1       2.1       2.0       2.6       1.3

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.0       3.9       2.8       2.7       2.7

    Occupied.............................     88.1      88.4      89.4      86.1      89.9
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Chanelle P. Hardy 

### Senior Vice President for Policy for the National Urban League and Executive Director of the National Urban League Policy Institute

Chanelle P. Hardy is the Senior Vice President for Policy for the National Urban League and Executive Director of the National Urban League Policy Institute, with primary responsibility for developing the League's policy, research and advocacy agenda and expanding its impact and influence inside the beltway. She serves as editor-in-chief of the NULPI signature publication, "The State of Black America," and coordinates the NUL Legislative Policy Conference.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Gregory K. Roeper, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vodavi Technology, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information ;and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 1, 2006                                                       /s/ Gregory K. Roeper   Gregory K. Roeper   Chief Executive Officer
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### December 14, 2005
Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. THOMAS EDWARD CALABAZA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-2238 (D.C. Nos. CV-04-0854 MV/RHS and

CR-00-1081 MV) (D. N.M.)

ORDER
Before BRISCOE , LUCERO, and MURPHY , Circuit Judges. Thomas Edward Calabaza, a federal prisoner proceedi ng pro se, requests a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition. For substantially the same reasons set f orth by the district court, we DENYCalabaza’s request for a COA and DISMISS
. Calabaza challenged his conviction for second degre e murder in the court below by bringing a motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 3 3. He asserted that new evidence has been uncovered that would produce a di fferent result if a new trial were held. Accordingly, the district court constru ed this motion as a motion for a new trial. “Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Crimin al Procedure, which authorizes- 2 -

motions for new trial, applies only to cases in whi ch a trial , either to the court or to a jury, has taken place.” United States v. Lamb ert , 603 F.2d 808, 809 (10th Cir. 1979) (emphasis in original). Because Calabaz a was convicted following a guilty plea, the district court denied the Rule 33 motion. The district court further held that although the motion invokes 28 U.S.C. § 2 255, it would, like this court in Lambert , “decline to consider sua sponte the [Rule 33] mot ion as one pursuant to § 2255.” Id. at 809 n.3. Calabaza’s subsequent request for a C OA was summarily denied. The district court correctly ruled that a Rule 33 m otion is a legally incorrect vehicle for challenging a guilty plea. Moreover, C alabaza’s request for a COA must be denied because a § 2255 petition was not pr operly before the district court. Thus, we do not have the denial of a habeas petition before us to consider on appeal. Finally, even if the district court con strued this pro se filing liberally,
seeHall v. Scott , 292 F.3d 1264, 1266 (10th Cir. 2002), and converted Calabaza’s Rule 33 motion into a § 2255 petition, the petitionwould nevertheless be timebarred under the one-year limitation period of § 22 55 because final judgment was entered in this proceeding more than four years ago . 28 U.S.C. § 2255(1). Calabaza’s application for a COA is therefore DENIED and the case is- 3 -

DISMISSED . Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED
.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
• Program Description Addendum

May 15, 1998

This Program Description addendum revises the State's authorized program to include the nontrust lands within the 1873 Survey Area ofthe Puyallup Reservation pursuant to the August 27,

1988 settlement agreement between the Puyallup Tribe, Federal, State, and local governments

(Settlement Agreement), ratified by Congress and incorporated in Federal law on June 21, 1989

as the Puyallup Tribe ofIndians Settlement Act of 1989, 25 USC Sections 1773, et. seq.

(Settlement Act).

Upon authorization ofthis program revision, the State will carry out all aspects ofthe authorized

dangerous waste program subject to the limitations below. The State authorized program that

will be implemented on the non-trust lands within the Puyallup reservation includes waste

designation requirements; generator, transporter, and recycling requirements; treatment, storage,

and disposal (TSD) facility requirements; permitting procedures; corrective action requirements;

and compliance monitoring and enforcement procedures.

The State will carry out the authorized dangerous waste program subject to the following

limitations: The authorizedprogram does not extend to Indians or Indian activities within the

1873 survey area. EPA retains primary responsibility for implementing RCRA on the trust

lands, and over Indians and Indian activities on the non-trust lands within the 1973 survey area.

• EPA and Ecology have developed an implementation strategy (part ofthe Memorandum of

Agreement addendum submitted with this authorization application) that will be used to

communicate changes in jurisdiction from Ecology to EPA, or from EPA to Ecology. The

"Implementation Strategy for Regulatory Agency Lead Changes" will be used to facilitate

information sharing and communicating jurisdictional changes on the non-trust lands within the

1873 Survey Area ofthe Puyallup Reservation.

The State will participate in providing intergovernmental consultation and coordination of

federal, tribal, state and local governmental environmental laws pursuant to the January 13, 1997

Intergovernmental Agreement among the Puyallup Tribe ofIndians, the Washington State

Department of Ecology, and the US Environmental Protection Agency (Intergovernmental

Agreement) .

•
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Children
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.49 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, NOV. 17, 2011 Disability Characteristics of School Age Children: 2010 This brief, based on 2010 American Community Survey estimates, examines disability type, school enrollment and geographic distribution for school-age children in the United States. The brief compares disability rates of children among states and metropolitan vs. nonmetropolitan areas. Highlights: Of the 53.9 million school-age children 5 to 17, about 2.8 million were reported as having a disability in 2010.

Across the states, the percentage of metro area children with disabilities who were enrolled in public schools ranged from 76.5 percent to nearly 100 percent.

Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Ohio and the District of Columbia had public school enrollment rates for children with a disability that was less than the national estimate, while Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas, Virginia and Wyoming had enrollment rates above the national estimate.

Rates of disability among school-age children for metropolitan statistical areas ranged from 1.2 to 13.0 percent, while the disability rates for those enrolled in public schools ranged from 1.4 percent to 14.6 percent.

About 89.4 percent of school-age children with a disability living in metro areas were enrolled in public schools, 7.3 percent were enrolled in private schools and 3.3 percent were not enrolled in school. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acsbr10-12.pdf>. [PDF] **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Roderick J. Harrison 

### Senior Research Scientist at Howard University, and a Senior Research Fellow within the Civic Engagement and Governance department at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies

Roderick J. Harrison is a Senior Research Scientist at Howard University, and a Senior Research Fellow within the Civic Engagement and Governance department at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. He is also the founding director of DataBank, an online clearinghouse of data on African Americans and other ethnic populations. Previously, he served as chief of the U.S. Census Bureau's Racial Statistics Branch where he helped to expand the content and number of the Bureau's publications and releases on racial and ethnic populations. 

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
# C_2012308EN.01000701.xml

| 12.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 October 2012

2012/C 308/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2918 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 101,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4588 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80525 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6627 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2087 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3825 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,940 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 281,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0910 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5703 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3407 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2573 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2645 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0148 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5796 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5857 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 438,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2664 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1086 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5225 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 389,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9622 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,548 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,1155 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,671 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6339 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6904 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,0200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2918

JPY

Japanese yen

101,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4588

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80525

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6627

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2087

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3825

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,940

HUF

Hungarian forint

281,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0910

RON

Romanian leu

4,5703

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3407

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2573

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2645

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0148

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5796

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5857

KRW

South Korean won

1 438,56

ZAR

South African rand

11,2664

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1086

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5225

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 389,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9622

PHP

Philippine peso

53,548

RUB

Russian rouble

40,1155

THB

Thai baht

39,671

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6339

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6904

INR

Indian rupee

68,0200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Blueprint










Exhibit
10.8




NOTE






 


September
30, 2016


 


            FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, BLUE DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY (the "Borrower"), hereby promises to pay to the order of
LAZARUS CAPITAL,
LLC ("Payee"), the principal sum of $422,373.79
pursuant to the terms and conditions
set forth herein.


            PAYMENT
OF PRINCIPAL.  The
principal amount of this Promissory Note (the "Note") and any
accrued but unpaid interest shall be due and payable on January 1,
2018. 


            INTEREST. 
This Note shall bear interest, compounded annually, at eight
percent.


PREPAYMENT.  The Borrower shall have the right at any
time and from time to time to prepay this Note in whole or in part
without premium or penalty.


            REMEDIES. 
No delay or omission on part of the holder of this Note in
exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any
such right or of any other right of such holder, nor shall any
delay, omission or waiver on any one occasion be deemed a bar to or
waiver of the same or any other right on any future occasion. 
The rights and remedies of the Payee shall be cumulative and may be
pursued singly, successively, or together, in the sole discretion
of the Payee.


            SUBORDINATION. 
The Borrower's obligations under this Note are subordinated to all
indebtedness of Borrower to any unrelated third party lender to the
extent such indebtedness is outstanding on the date of this Note
and such subordination is required under the loan documents
providing for such indebtedness.


            EXPENSES. 
In the event any payment under this Note is not paid when due, the
Borrower agrees to pay, in addition to the principal and interest
hereunder, reasonable attorneys' fees not exceeding a sum equal to
15% of the then outstanding balance owing on the Note, plus all
other reasonable expenses incurred by Payee in exercising any of
its rights and remedies upon default.


            GOVERNING
LAW.  This Note shall be
governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the
State of Texas.


            IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower
has executed this Note as of the day and year first above
written.


 


___/s/ JONATHAN P.
CARROLL____ (LENDER SIGNATURE)


LAZARUS CAPITAL,
LLC                                                                                                                      
September 30, 2016


 


__/s/ TOMMY L.
BYRD___ (BORROWER SIGNATURE)


BLUE DOLPHIN ENERGY
COMPANY                                                                                                
September 30, 2016
No. 00-7241.

#### Jones *v.*Hall, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Manufacturing    >Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories, & Orders    >Benchmark
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQS	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQS	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories, & Orders - Benchmark
  Benchmark Reports Highlights
 Benchmark Reports released May 12, 2023 at 10:00 A.M EDT Full - Text and Tables
 Table 1 - Shipments
 Table 2 - New Orders
 Table 3 - Unfilled Orders
 Table 4 - Inventories
 Table 5 - Topical Series
 Table 6 - Stage of Fabrication
 Table 7 - Ratios
 All Tables
 Table 1 - Shipments
 Table 2 - New Orders
 Table 3 - Unfilled Orders
 Table 4 - Inventories
 Table 5 - Topical Series
 Table 6 -  Stage of Fabrication
 Table 7 - Ratios
 Summary of Revisions and Survey Information
 Annual Benchmark Data and Benchmark Procedures
 Trading Day Diagnostics
 Seasonal Summary Measures
 Last Revised: May 12, 2023


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Stephen Merrill DEPNER v. Dorothy Paxon BARKER.

No. 61271.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Stephen Merrill Depner, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the *1341Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche. 351 So.2d 1264.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Christopher McALISTER.

No. 59873.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

Fred C. Jackson, Saint Francisville, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leon A. Picou, Jr., Dist. Atty., William E. Woodward, Asst. Dist. Atty., A. Z. Bútterworth, Sp. Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.