alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VOLODYMYR KUZMENKO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-73154

Agency No. A098-157-041

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 22, 2015** 

Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Volodymyr Kuzmenko, a native of the former Soviet Union and a citizen of

Ukraine, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed

by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

FILED

JUN 30 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
reopen, review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual determinations, and

review de novo constitutional claims. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-

92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Kuzmenko’s motion to

reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel, where Kuzmenko failed to

establish prejudice resulting from his former attorney’s alleged ineffective

assistance. See id. at 793 (to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim,

a petitioner must demonstrate that counsel failed to perform with sufficient

competence and that he was prejudiced by counsel’s performance). The record

does not support Kuzmenko’s contention that his attorney failed to understand that

his claim was for an imputed political opinion, and because substantial evidence

supports the IJ’s determination that, even if Kuzmenko had been deemed credible,

his claim for asylum and related relief fails on the merits, Kuzmenko cannot

establish prejudice resulting from any alleged attorney errors related to the IJ’s

adverse credibility determination. 

We lack jurisdiction to consider Kuzmenko’s unexhausted contention that

his attorney erred in earlier filing a motion to reopen to apply for adjustment of

status. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court lacks

2 10-73154
jurisdiction to consider legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative

proceedings before the agency). 

Further, we deny Kuzmenko’s request for judicial notice of non-relevant,

extra-record information discussed in his opening brief. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(b)(4)(A) (“the court of appeals shall decide the petition only on the

administrative record on which the order of removal is based”); Ruiz v. City of

Santa Maria, 160 F.3d 543, 548 n.13 (9th Cir. 1998) (judicial notice is

inappropriate where the facts to be noticed are not relevant to the disposition of the

issues before the court).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Kuzmenko’s remaining

contentions. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 10-73154
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                           6,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                       994
<INVENTORY>                                     19,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,916
<PP&E>                                         118,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,486
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,210
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,899
<SALES>                                         43,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,183
<CGS>                                           27,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    81
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,923
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06


</TABLE>
## Petitioning for Exemption under Section 333

Shell	Docket	FAA

- 2007

- 0001

Damian	Thomas

True	Point	of	View	LLC.

3550	Diamond	Leaf	Lane

Oviedo,	FL	32766

Contact#	407

- 451

- 7020

Email: damian@truepointofview.com

Please	note: I’m	transitioning	from	full

- time	employee	to	Independent	Contractor. I	w ill	resume

contract ing work	with	present company/clients as New	Company:	True	Point	of	View	LLC. Fu lly

operational	as	of	November, 2015.

I	am	petitioning	for	authorization	to operate	a	UAS	for	civil purposes.

I	am	a	professional	videographer	and	photographer	work ing	on	assignment	for	several

major	hotels	and	resorts.		I	provide	Ariel	POV’s	for villa inventory	sales ,	new

construction and for	use	in	the	creation	of digital	content for	sale	displays.

I	am	on	assignment	all	through out the	United	States	and	abroad.

I also	provide	Ariel	Surveys	for	builders	and	Land	plotting	companies.

I	take	care	in	operating my UAS by	abiding	by	the	rules	and	us e my aircraft	to	perform	in

a	professional	manner, with a	watchful	eye	of	the	public.

I	am	now	seeking	to	volunteer	my	ai rcraft	and	services	to	help	Fire/	Rescue	and	first

responders	in	the	search	and	recovery	of	persons	in	need.

Thank	you	for	your	consideration.

Damian	Thomas
EXHIBIT 11
                                
                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
         for the fiscal years ended 1996, 1995 and 1994
      (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
                                
                                
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                
                                
                               1996       1995       1994
<S>                            <C>        <C>        <C>
Primary Earnings Per Share:                           

Net Earnings                   $ 2,355    $   681    $ 1,385
                                                   
Weighted Average Shares                                   
Outstanding:                   
  Common Shares                  1,125      1,129      1,140
                                                          
Primary Earnings Per Share     $  2.09    $   .60    $  1.21
                                                                
                                                               
Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:                                 
                                                          
Net Earnings                   $ 2,355    $   681    $ 1,385
                                                          
Weighted Average Shares                                   
Outstanding:                                                  
  Common Shares                  1,136      1,129      1,140
                                                          
Fully Diluted Earnings                                       
 Per Share                     $  2.07    $   .60    $  1.21
                                

</TABLE>

                                
Notes:
Common  stock equivalents are excluded from the primary  earnings
per  share weighted average shares outstanding on the face of the
Consolidated  Statements of Operations and Retained  Earnings  as
their effect is immaterial.

Fully  diluted earnings per share for 1996 are not  disclosed  on
the  face  of  the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations  and
Retained Earnings as their effect is immaterial.

The above weighted average shares outstanding can also be used to
compute  the  primary and fully diluted earnings  per  share  for
continuing and discontinued operations.
<PAGE>
                                     EXHIBIT 23.1


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of EIP Microwave, Inc (the "Company") of our report dated
December 18, 1998, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the
Company and subsidiary appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended September 30, 1998.  Our report contains an explanatory
paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

/s/   BDO Seidman, LLP

BDO Seidman, LLP

San Jose, California
January 12, 1999
CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 16, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Michael L. AsmussenMichael L. AsmussenDirector, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Joseph SELMON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49719.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 18, 1978.

Halat & Pisarich, Peter Halat, Biloxi, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Frankie Walton White, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; Floyd J. Logan, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., concur.
# C_2012384EN.01000501.xml

| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 December 2012

2012/C 384/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3040 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 108,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4604 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80775 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6275 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2109 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3295 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,265 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,33 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0969 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5268 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3198 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2358 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2850 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1061 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5504 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5926 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3109 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1480 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5225 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 558,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9792 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,502 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9645 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,928 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7112 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6319 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,7490 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3040

JPY

Japanese yen

108,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4604

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80775

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6275

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2109

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3295

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,265

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,33

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0969

RON

Romanian leu

4,5268

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3198

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2358

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2850

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1061

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5504

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5926

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,12

ZAR

South African rand

11,3109

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1480

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5225

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 558,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9792

PHP

Philippine peso

53,502

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9645

THB

Thai baht

39,928

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7112

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6319

INR

Indian rupee

70,7490

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.146 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, APRIL 21, 2010 Georgia Matches Its 2000 Census Mail Participation Rates According to the latest 2010 Census mail participation rates released today, the state of Georgia has now matched the rate it had achieved during the 2000 Census — 69 percent. Georgia is one of 19 states, in addition to Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, that have met or surpassed their rates from the 2000 Census. The Census Bureau will continue to post updates to the participation rate throughout the week as the last of the mailed-back forms are processed. After Friday, April 23, no rate updates will be posted until the final mail participation rate is calculated and announced at a news conference during the week of April 26. The complete list of states that have reached this milestone follows: Alabama
  Delaware
  Florida
  Hawaii
  Illinois
  Indiana
  Kentucky
  Maine
  Minnesota
  New York
  North Carolina
  Rhode Island
  South Carolina
  Tennessee
  Utah
  Vermont
  Virginia
  Washington ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are used to apportion congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to tribal, state and local governments each year and to make decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census form is one of the shortest in U.S. history, consisting of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict confidentiality laws protect the respondents and the information they provide.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-12 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, JAN. 13, 2012 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Technical Webinar to Highlight  Upcoming Population Estimates Releases What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau will hold a technical webinar to provide the media with a look ahead at multiple population estimates releases scheduled for the upcoming year. These are the first set of annual population estimates to be published since the official 2010 Census state population counts were released a year ago. The webinar focuses on the methodology and the uses of population estimates, as well as the schedule of releases during 2012. The news conference will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. Information on accessing the online presentation is provided below. Reporters will be able to ask questions once the presentation is complete. We suggest reporters log in and call in early.
 When:
 Thursday, Jan. 19, 2012; 10 a.m. (EST)
 Who:
 Gregory Harper, demographer, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau
 Details:
 **Audio conference — access information**Toll free number: 888-982-4490
Passcode: 2011POPEST
Note: Stay on the line until operator asks for the passcode. Do not key in passcode. **Online presentation — access information****Please login early, as some setup is required.**
URL:  https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/
Conference/meeting number: PW2702879
Conference/meeting passcode: 2011POPEST
  Follow @uscensusbureau on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and Ustream.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Monroe J. Carell, Jr., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Central Parking
Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 17, 2004                By: /s/ MONROE J. CARELL, JR.
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Monroe J. Carell, Jr.
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Victor Zhou and Rachel Zhang, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 18, 2010
By:
/s/ Victor ZhouDated: May 18, 2010
By:
Victor Zhou

Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Rachel Zhang

Rachel Zhang

Chief Financial Officer