alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  83 FR 25496, June 
1, 2018.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:  Tuesday, June 5, 
2018 at 10:00 a.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:  The Open Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 
5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. has been changed to Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 
11:30 a.m. The following items will not be considered during the 
Commission's Open Meeting:
    <bullet> Whether to adopt a new rule as well as amendments to rules 
and forms to provide certain registered investment companies 
(``funds'') with an optional method to transmit shareholder reports.
    <bullet> whether to issue a release requesting comment about 
processing fees for delivering shareholder reports and other materials 
to fund investors.
    <bullet> whether to issue a release requesting comment from 
individual investors and other interested parties on how to enhance the 
delivery, design, and content of fund disclosures, including 
shareholder reports and prospectuses.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: June 4, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17390 Filed 8-9-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-18-036]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

August 24, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote on Inv. Nos. 731-TA-678-679 and 681-682 (Fourth Review) (Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission by September 11, 2018.

5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: August 7, 2018.

William Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-17260 Filed 8-8-18; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### STATE of Mississippi v. Charles LATHAM and David Marburry.

No. 47453.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 1, 1973.

Gerald W. Chatham, Hernando, A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Edwin A. Snyder, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellant.

Troutt & Moore, Senatobia, for appel-lees.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and SUGG, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tate County; Dick R. Thomas, Judge.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-2-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-2-1995
<CASH>                                           5,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,159)
<INVENTORY>                                     70,269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,397
<PP&E>                                         136,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                (61,045)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,902
<BONDS>                                         84,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,549
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   283,110
<SALES>                                        220,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,044
<CGS>                                          131,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  195,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   545
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,027
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.52
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




The Board of Directors
Kaneb Pipe Line Company:



     We consent to the use of our reports included herein and incorporated by
reference herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts"
in the Prospectus.

                                                     KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
August 25, 2000
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MICHAEL COLEMAN ,

Appellant , v. Cas e No. 5D 21 -2275 LT Case No. 2017
- CF

- 1849 -A STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed August 9, 2022 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Melissa Souto, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden , Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Michael Coleman, Madison, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. WALLIS, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

 

**THEDAYTON POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

The undersigned officer of The Dayton Powerand Light Company (the “Issuer”) hereby certify that the Issuer’s Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, which this certificateaccompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Issuer.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 
| /s/ James V. Mahoney                   |
|----------------------------------------|
| James  V. Mahoney                      |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

 

 

Date: March 14, 2005

 

 

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Corning Natural Gas
Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants




---



##### 



a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 By:
    
    /s/ Michael I. GermanMichael I. GermanChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate: June 1, 2007
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 70

                                                                 Exhibit 23








                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form  S-3 Numbers  33-57910  and  33-55803)  of American  General  Finance
Corporation  and in the related  Prospectuses of our  report dated February
14,  1997,  with  respect  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of American General Finance Corporation and subsidiaries  included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                            ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 18, 1997
<PAGE>
# C_2013144EN.01000601.xml

| 24.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 May 2013

2013/C 144/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2888 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4541 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85515 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5943 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2486 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5340 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,094 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,18 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7005 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2092 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3872 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3302 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3339 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0044 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5932 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6301 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 454,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,3661 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9055 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5765 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 608,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9060 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,778 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,4890 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,561 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6463 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1081 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,8050 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2888

JPY

Japanese yen

131,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4541

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85515

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5943

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2486

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5340

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,094

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,18

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7005

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2092

RON

Romanian leu

4,3655

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3872

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3302

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3339

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0044

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5932

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6301

KRW

South Korean won

1 454,95

ZAR

South African rand

12,3661

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9055

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5765

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 608,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9060

PHP

Philippine peso

53,778

RUB

Russian rouble

40,4890

THB

Thai baht

38,561

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6463

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1081

INR

Indian rupee

71,8050

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### PHILLIPS DISTRIBUTORS, INC., by its Officer, John J. Whitehead, Appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 46375.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 8, 1971.

Cumbest, Cumbest & Shaddock, Pasca-goula, for appellant.

William J. Palmer, Pascagoula, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Arthur D. ELSBERRY, Petitioner, v. JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY, Respondent.

No. 42507.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 27, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 262 So.2d 465.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
# C_2013183EN.01001401.xml

| 28.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/14

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6943 — Triton/Befesa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 183/05

On 17 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6943. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6943. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Jackie HARDIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-584.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2862

To assure compliance with the guarantees of the 5th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution by prohibiting the intentional creation of

legislative districts based on race, color, or language minority status

of voters within such districts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1993

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut (for himself, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. BARTLETT

of Maryland, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. BLUTE,

Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURTON of Indiana,

Mr. CAMP, Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr. CANADY, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. COLLINS of

Georgia, Mr. COMBEST, Mr. COX, Mr. CRANE, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr.

DOOLITTLE, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. DREIER, Mr. DUNN, Mr. EVERETT, Mr.

FAWELL, Mr. FOWLER, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. GILMAN, Mr.

GILLMOR, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. GOODLING, Mr. GOSS, Mr. GREENWOOD,

Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. HERGER,

Mr. HOBSON, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. INHOFE, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. KIM, Mr. KING,

Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. LEVY, Mr. LEWIS of Florida, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Mr.

LIVINGSTON, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. MYERS of Indiana, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. PETRI, Mr. POMBO, Mr.

PORTMAN, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. QUILLEN, Mr. QUINN, Mr. RAMSTAD,

Mr. REGULA, Mr. RIDGE, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. ROTH,

Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. SKEEN, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr.

STEARNS, Mr. STUMP, Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. TALENT, Mr. TORKILDSEN,

Mr. WALSH, Mr. WELDON, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, and Mr. ZELIFF) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To assure compliance with the guarantees of the 5th, 14th,
2

•HR 2862 IH

and 15th amendments to the Constitution by prohibiting

the intentional creation of legislative districts based on

race, color, or language minority status of voters within

such districts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

4 It shall be unlawful for any State or political subdivi5 sion, in the establishment of districts for the election of

6 members to any Federal, State, or local multi-member

7 body with legislative functions, to create any such district

8 with the intent to assure that a majority of the voters in

9 that district are people of a particular race or color or

10 language minority (as such term is used in title I of the

11 Voting Rights Act of 1965).

12 SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTION.

13 Any person who is aggrieved by a violation of section

14 1 may, in a civil action, obtain appropriate relief.

Æ
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp el l ant . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OS E AN DR E W NAV A, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. M I C H A E L KN O W L E S , W ar de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 55304 D . C. N o . 5 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 0 9 6 - PA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia P e r c yA nde r s on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B efo re: T R O T T , G O U L D , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia p riso n erJo se A n d re w N av a ap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED OC T 27 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 55304 2 N a v ac o n te n d s th a t th e e v id e n c e in tr o du c e da t h is tr ia l w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to supp ortthe j ury’ s true f i nd i ng on a c ri m i nal stre etgang enhancem ent . T he re cord re fl ec t s thatthe C al i forni a app el l at e c ou rt ’ s r ej ec t i on of thi s c l ai m w as no tcontrary t o, or an un re as on abl e app l i cat i on of, fe dera l l aw ; no r w as i tbase d o n an u n r e a s o n ab le d e te rm in a tio n o f th e f a c ts . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 ( d ) ; Jack son v. V ir g in ia , 4 4 3 U .S . 3 0 7 , 3 1 9 ( 1 9 7 9 ) ; P eople v . G ardeley , 14 C a l . 4th 605, 624 n. 10 (199 6). W e c ons true N a va ’ s a ddi t i ona l a r gum e nt s a s am ot i on t o e xpa nd the c e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ility . S o c o n s tru e d , th e m o tio n is d e n ie d . See 9th C i r . R . 22- 1 ( e ) ; Hi i v ala v . W

ood , 19 5 F . 3d 10 98 , 11 04 -05 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( per c uri am ). AF F I RME D.
AHCENE ZEMIRI,

Petitioner,

 v.

BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the

United States, et al.,

Respondents.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No. 04-2046 (CKK)

ORDER

(June 15, 2009)

The Court held a closed-session Status Hearing in the above-captioned case on June 12,

2009. The Court set a schedule for further proceedings based on the assumption that the

Guantanamo Review Task Force operating pursuant to Executive Order No. 13,492 has not made

any recommendations–and the Review Panel in connection with the same has made no

decisions–that would render unnecessary or otherwise inefficient the further expenditure of

judicial and party resources in this matter. To ensure that remains a correct assumption, it is, this

15th day of June, 2009, hereby

ORDERED that Respondents’ counsel shall have an affirmative obligation to ascertain

whether the Guantanamo Review Task Force has made any recommendations regarding the

disposition of Petitioner and, if it has, to notify the Court of the same. If a recommendation

regarding the disposition of Petitioner has been made, Respondents’ counsel shall also have an

affirmative obligation to ascertain whether the Review Panel has made any decisions in

connection with the recommendation and, if so, to notify the Court with the results of such

decisions; it is further
2

ORDERED that the obligations imposed on Respondents’ counsel pursuant to this Order

shall be immediate and ongoing.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

United States District Judge
#### Willis V. McCALL, Sheriff of Lake County, Florida, Relator, v. The GRAND JURY OF ORANGE COUNTY, Florida, et al., Respondents.

No. 72-539.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 5, 1972.

Prohibition denied.
J

,,,iED si Ars

s, UNITED STATES ENYIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 ~ F



# ~ "2rq < PflO0-`C~

# ~Ufw~a~9~