alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersignedhereby certify that pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008(the “Form 10-Q”) of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at and for theperiods indicated.

 

Dated:May 2, 2008
|   | By:    | /S/ DAVID J. BARRETT                                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | David J. Barrett                                      |
|   | Title: | President and Chief  Executive Officer                |
|   |   |                                                  |
|   |   |                                                  |
|   | By:    | /S/ HARRY T. HAWKS                                    |
|   | Name:  | Harry T. Hawks                                        |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### S. E. CORKHILL AND ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Allen L. MAYERSON, as Receiver of Exchange Casualty & Surety Company, a Michigan insurance corporation, Appellee.

No. 1113.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 4, 1967.

Alan G. Grant, Jr., Orlando, for appellant.

Frank A. Howard, Jr., of Nicholson, Howard, Brawner & Lovett, Miami, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant, S. E. Corkhill and Associates, Inc., from an interlocutory order directing the filing of an accounting of all monies owed to the plaintiff, Allen L. Mayerson, as Receiver of Exchange Casualty & Surety Company, a Michigan insurance corporation.

The court has carefully considered the appeal papers, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties. From such consideration we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and ANDREWS and CROSS, JJ., concur.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-17-00208-CR

DEVANTE DAMON DARDEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 45315-B

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as 

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security 

number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). Volume six of the reporter’s record includes a social security number. 

Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, 

including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX.R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because volume 

six of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, 

in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed volume six of the reporter’s record 

in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: October 29, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,657
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,590
<INVENTORY>                                    4,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,986
<PP&E>                                         8,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,718
<BONDS>                                        34,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    4
<COMMON>                                       9
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,880
<SALES>                                        8,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,444
<CGS>                                          6,240
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,456)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.69)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2012324EN.01000401.xml

| 25.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 October 2012

2012/C 324/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2942 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6558 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2100 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4350 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,973 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 280,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1357 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5765 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3365 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2526 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2807 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0304 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5887 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5832 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 428,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3602 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0858 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5640 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 437,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9619 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,613 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6250 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,758 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6213 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7825 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,6690 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2942

JPY

Japanese yen

103,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80830

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6558

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2100

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4350

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,973

HUF

Hungarian forint

280,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1357

RON

Romanian leu

4,5765

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3365

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2526

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2807

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0304

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5887

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5832

KRW

South Korean won

1 428,48

ZAR

South African rand

11,3602

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0858

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5640

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 437,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9619

PHP

Philippine peso

53,613

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6250

THB

Thai baht

39,758

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6213

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7825

INR

Indian rupee

69,6690

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Howard O’NEILL and Betty O’Neill d/b/a Betty O. Houseboat Rentals, Appellants, v. Martin BLACKWELDER, Appellee.

No. 70-422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1



                             MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

             Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, Independent Auditor


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Cone Mills Corporation's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-31977; 33-31979; 33-51951;
33-51953; 33-53705 and 33-67800) of our reports; dated February 11, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cone Mills Corporation for the fiscal year ended
January 2, 2000.



                                                     /s/McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
                                                     --------------------------
                                                        MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 27, 2000
# C_2011335EN.01000201.xml

| 16.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6212 — LVMH/Bulgari)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 335/02

On 29 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6212. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6212. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 23

           
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
DDL Electronics, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-02969) and the Registration Statements on 
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-18356, 33-45102, 33-74400 and 333-08689) of DDL 
Electronics, Inc. of our report dated September 6, 1996, except for the 
last paragraph of Note 12, which is as of October 9, 1996, relating to 
the consolidated balance sheets of DDL Electronics, Inc. and 
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity (deficit) 
for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1996,
 which report appears in the June 30, 1996 Annual Report on
 Form 10-K of DDL Electronics, Inc.




/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Los Angeles, California
October 9, 1996
# C_2012128EN.01000701.xml

| 3.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/7

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,00 % on 1 May 2012

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

2 May 2012

2012/C 128/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3131 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 105,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4385 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81205 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8884 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2018 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5525 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,903 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6994 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1693 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4268 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3134 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2718 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2977 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1873 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6165 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6292 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 484,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1650 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2397 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4975 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 085,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9767 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,495 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,7000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,535 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5105 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9849 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,4040 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3131

JPY

Japanese yen

105,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4385

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81205

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8884

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2018

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5525

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,903

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6994

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1693

RON

Romanian leu

4,4268

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3134

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2718

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2977

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1873

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6165

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6292

KRW

South Korean won

1 484,06

ZAR

South African rand

10,1650

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2397

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4975

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 085,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9767

PHP

Philippine peso

55,495

RUB

Russian rouble

38,7000

THB

Thai baht

40,535

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5105

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9849

INR

Indian rupee

69,4040

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-05-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-05-2000
<CASH>                                             475
<SECURITIES>                                    49,071
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                       287
<INVENTORY>                                     11,641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,464
<PP&E>                                         226,157
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,094
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,117
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,263
<SALES>                                        319,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               319,135
<CGS>                                           39,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  312,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,197
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (6,429)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,232)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.32)



</TABLE>
260 La. 125

#### Windom J. LAMBERT v. Cecil D. KELLEY et al. PENN MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Windom J. LAMBERT.

No. 51953.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1971.

In re: Cecil D. Kelley and Mrs. Marie Kelley applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Ascension. 253 So.2d 675.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41855

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

CHRISTOPHER JOHN NAGY ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 862

Filed: December 15, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. Lansing L. Haynes , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for aggravated assault and concurrent unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for aggravated battery, affirm ed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General ; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELAN SON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Christopher John Nagy pled guilty to aggravated assault , I.C. §§ 18

- 901 and 18

- 905, and

aggravated battery, I.C. §§ 18

- 903 and 18

- 907

. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional

charges were dismissed. The district court sentenced Nagy to a unified term of five years, with a

minimum period of confinement of thr ee years, for aggravated assault and a concurrent unified

term of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for aggravated

battery. Nagy filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Nagy appeals.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Na gy ’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
#### Sammie Lee MONROE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent. Sammie Lee MONROE, Petitioner, v. Raymond D. MASSEY, Superintendent, Florida State Prison, and Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondents.

Nos. 72-811, 72-838.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 8, 1974.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey and Stephen R. *392Koons, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

In each of these consolidated cases we granted writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of permitting delayed appellate review of the respective judgments and sentences on three charges of robbery and one charge of assault with intent to' commit first degree murder. Having considered the briefs and record, we find no reversible error. The respective judgments and sentences are severally affirmed and the writ discharged.

OWEN, *C.*J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.   /s/Leon J. Olivier(Signature)Leon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHale(Signature)David R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date:  February 28, 2008  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.