alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                                 UT

<LEGEND>                                  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS
                                          SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                                          INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                                          FROM CONSOLIDATED
                                          BALANCE SHEET, INCOME
                                          STATEMENT AND STATEMENT OF
                                          CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED
                                          IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                                          TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                          AND THE NOTES THERETO

<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS

<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                 11,067,310

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  177,224

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                     1,132,487

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     695,882

<OTHER-ASSETS>                               984,282

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            14,057,185

<COMMON>                                     587,484

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    856,149

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                        4,283,935

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             5,727,568

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         84,550

<PREFERRED>                                  238,098

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       4,238,622

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                          0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                106,256

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                   42,661

<LEASES-CURRENT>                               2,591

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             3,616,839

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>             14,057,185

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  6,959,736

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         397,160

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 5,548,985

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 5,946,145

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                    1,013,591

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             4,016

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>             1,017,607

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     323,522

<NET-INCOME>                                 694,085

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   19,859

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                688,169

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     488,756

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                    307,820

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                     1,107,337

<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   2.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   2.93


</TABLE>
#### FLORIDA CITIES WATER COMPANY, Appellant, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.

No. 44310.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 13, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
Document






July 27, 2022




Thomas Castellano




Dear Tom,


I am very pleased to share that the Compensation and Leadership Committee of the Board of Directors has approved an increase to your Total Direct Compensation (“TDC”) comprising your base salary, short-term cash incentive and long-term equity incentives. The specific changes to your TDC are outlined below.


•Base Pay:  Effective July 21, 2022, your annual rate of pay will increase to $550,000.


•MIP Target: You will continue to participate in the Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”). Your MIP target for fiscal year 2023 (July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023) will increase to $450,000.


•LTIP Target: You will continue to participate in the Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”). Your LTIP target for the fiscal year 2023 – 2025 performance period has increased to $1,250,000.




									
		Current TDC
	New TDC
	Base Salary	$500,000
	$550,000

	MIP Target	$400,000
	$450,000

	Target Total Cash	$900,000
	$1,000,000

	LTIP Target	$600,000
	$1,250,000

	Target TDC *	$1,500,000
	$2,250,000

	% Change		+50.0%







All other terms and conditions of your employment remain unchanged. Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any questions.




Sincerely,

Alessandro Maselli
President & Chief Executive Officer


cc:    Ricardo Pravda
SVP & Chief Human Resources Officer
















Page 1 of 1
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1965 

To amend the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract Extension 

Act to permit the Secretary of the Interior to extend the contract for 

certain water services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2014 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract 

Extension Act to permit the Secretary of the Interior 

to extend the contract for certain water services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EAST BENCH IRRIGATION DISTRICT CONTRACT 

4 EXTENSION. 

5 Section 2(1) of the East Bench Irrigation District 

6 Water Contract Extension Act (Public Law 112–139; 126 

7 Stat. 390) is amended by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘10 years’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In re ADOPTION OF Randall Gary MORRISSETTE and Mark Robert Morrissette, minors, by Lynda Sue Morrissette, their stepmother.

No. 43372.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 5, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.
#### Ralph Otis DAVIS and Louise Davis Yaeger, Appellants, v. Wm. H. ARKENBERG et al., Appellees.

No. 459.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 13, 1967.

B. E. Hendricks, of Hendricks & Hendricks, Miami, for appellants.

Madison F. Pacetti, of Caldwell, Pacetti, Foster & Barrow, Palm Beach, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

This is a will construction case.

A testatrix disposed of eight items of her real and personal property “to E. R. Davis Jr., Ralph Otis Davis, W. W. M. Davis, Louise Davis Yaeger and Frances Davis Talcott, who are the children of my late husband E. R. Davis. * * * ” Three of the named beneficiaries predeceased the testatrix.

Was this a testamentary disposition to individuals or was it to a class ?

If the recipients are construed as “individuals”, then under the facts of this case the gift would lapse, according to F.S.A. § 731.20, and become, by the operation of the law of descent and distribution, the property of the testatrix’ lineal descendants, who are the appellees.

If the recipients are construed as members of a “class”, then the surviving members of the class would be entitled to receive the interests of the deceased class members. Such survivors are the appellants here.

The trial court decreed that the disposition “constituted gifts to individuals, and not gifts to a class, and, therefore * * * lapse in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 731.20(1) Florida Statutes.”

Considering the rules of construction and the proper indicia whereby a testatrix’ intention is measured, and particularly the fact that the beneficiaries were referred to by name, we are altogether persuaded that *47the proper construction was placed upon the will by the trial court. We, therefore, affirm by authority of Douglas v. Hardin, Fla.App.1960, 120 So.2d 190, and In re Eltzeroth’s Estate, Fla.1955, 83 So.2d 772. See also Magruder v. Magruder, Fla.App.*1963,*157 So.2d *86;*35 Fla.Jur., Wills, § 297.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., ANDREWS, J., and McDonald, PARKER LEE, Associate Judge, concur.
#### Thomas REDDICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2161.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2012032EN.01000101.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/1

---

2012/C 32/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 25, 28.1.2012

OJ C 25, 28.1.2012

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 13, 14.1.2012

OJ C 6, 7.1.2012

OJ C 370, 17.12.2011

OJ C 362, 10.12.2011

OJ C 355, 3.12.2011

OJ C 347, 26.11.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2012217EN.01000101.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/1

---

2012/C 217/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 209, 14.7.2012

OJ C 209, 14.7.2012

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 200, 7.7.2012

OJ C 194, 30.6.2012

OJ C 184, 23.6.2012

OJ C 174, 16.6.2012

OJ C 165, 9.6.2012

OJ C 157, 2.6.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 21.0

      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 2003

                                       STATE/PROVINCE     COUNTRY
                                       --------------  -------------
CPI Corp.                                 Delaware     United States

   Consumer Programs, Incorporated        Missouri     United States
     d/b/a Sears Portrait Studios
       Centrics Technology, Inc.          Delaware     United States
          d/b/a searsphoto.com
       Consumer Programs Partner,Inc.     Delaware     United States
       CPI Images L.L.C.                  Missouri     United States
          d/b/a Sears Portrait Studios
          d/b/a Mainstreet Portraits
       CPI Research and Development, Inc. Delaware     United States
       myportraits.com, Inc.              Missouri     United States

   CPI Corp. Canada                       Nova Scotia  Canada
     d/b/a Sears Portrait Studios

   CPI Technology Corp.                   Missouri     United States

   CPI Prints Plus, Inc.                  Delaware     United States
     Prints Plus Ridgedale                Minnesota    United States

   CPI Portrait Studios de Mexico
     S. de R.L. de C.V.                  Monterey,
                                          Nuevo Leon   Mexico
#### J. Ward KORMAN et al., Petitioners, v. Melissa O’DELL, a minor, by and through her father and natural guardian, C. M. O’Dell, Jr., and Regal Marine Industries, Inc., Respondents.

No. 73-441.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 5, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Manufacturing    >Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories, & Orders Data    >Release Schedule
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQS	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQS	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  **Release Dates for the M3 Survey** **Survey Month**
			**Advance Report on Durable Goods and Advance Total Manufacturing
			(8:30 a.m. release time)**
			**Full Report
			(10:00 a.m. release time)**September 2023
			10/26/2023
			11/2/2023October 2023
			11/22/2023
			12/4/2023November 2023
			12/22/2023
			1/5/2024December 2023
			1/25/2024
			2/2/2024January 2024
			2/27/2024
			3/5/2024February 2024
			3/26/2024
			4/2/2024March 2024
			4/24/2024
			5/2/2024April 2024
			5/24/2024
			6/4/2024May 2024
			6/27/2024
			7/3/2024June 2024
			7/25/2024
			8/2/2024July 2024
			8/26/2024
			9/4/2024August 2024
			9/26/2024
			10/3/2024September 2024
			10/25/2024
			11/4/2024October 2024
			11/27/2024
			12/4/2024November 2024
			12/24/2024
			Not available at this time


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Dedric Leon HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and Lester Lloyd Remaley, Appellees.

No. 70-800.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 11, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Third Quarter:  2005 and 2006
         (in percent)
                                    90-percent
                    Third    Third  confidence   90-percent confidence
Age of householder Quarter  Quarter interval (+)a  interval (&plusmn;)a
                    2005     2006   of 2006 rate  of difference

United States.....    68.8     69.0      0.5           0.4

    Under 25 years    27.0     25.3      1.5           1.4
    25 to 29 years    40.7     42.8      1.5           1.4
    30 to 34 years    56.1     55.8      1.4           1.4
    35 to 39 years    65.8     66.4      1.3           1.2
    40 to 44 years    71.1     71.1      1.2           1.1
    45 to 49 years    74.7     74.8      1.1           1.2
    50 to 54 years    78.9     78.3      1.1           1.2
    55 to 59 years    80.4     80.0      0.8           0.9
    60 to 64 years    81.6     81.4      0.9           1.0
    65 to 69 years    83.4     82.9      1.4           1.2
    70 to 74 years    82.5     83.3      1.5           1.3
    75 years and o    78.4     79.9      1.1           1.0

    Under 35 years    43.0     43.0      0.9           0.8
    35 to 44 years    68.6     68.8      0.9           0.8
    45 to 54 years    76.7     76.4      0.8           0.8
    55 to 64 years    80.9     80.7      0.6           0.6
 65 years and over    80.6     81.5      0.8           0.7

aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliablilty.  
The larger the confidence interval is,in relation to the size of the estimate, 
the less reliable the estimate.
#### In re ESTATE of Anthony BUSCAINO, Sr., Deceased. Paul BUSCAINO, Executor of the Estate of Anthony Buscaino, Sr., Appellant, v. Boss BUSCAINO et al., Appellees.

No. 71-405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2014 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| *January 26, 2015* | * *                  | By: | *s/James   F. Conway III* |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|-----|---------------------------|
| **Date**                | **James F. Conway III**   |
|                    | Chairman,   President and |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
#### OHIO MUNICIPAL JUDGES ASSN. et al. *v.*DAVIS et al.

No. 72-1010.

Decided March 26, 1973

Per Curiam.

The motion of American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as *amicus curiae,*is granted.

On the ground that it was beyond its authority to grant the primary relief sought, the United States District Court dismissed appellants’ suit which alleged that Art. IV, § 6 (B), of the Ohio Constitution denied equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The judgment is affirmed, but on the ground that appellants’ constitutional challenge to Art. IV, § 6 (B), was without merit.

*So ordered.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                        1,366,654
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 868,307
<ALLOWANCES>                  576,775
<INVENTORY>                   132,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              3,294,785
<PP&E>                        3,696,832
<DEPRECIATION>                2,879,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                11,774,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,934,986
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   10
<COMMON>                      27,563
<OTHER-SE>                    6,649,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  11,774,455
<SALES>                       348,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              348,228
<CGS>                         116,541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,909,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            38,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,740,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,671,138)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,671,138)
<EPS-BASIC>                 (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.06)
<FN>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY THE REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB
</FN>



</TABLE>
# C_2012111EN.01000101.xml

| 18.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6346 — APMT/Bolloré/Congo Terminal)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 111/01

On 12 April 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6346. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6346. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of CheckFree Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Peter J. Kight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: November 9, 2004
    
    /s/ Peter J. KightPeter J. KightChairman and Chief Executive OfficerCheckFree Corporation
 This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                    2,780
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          2,780
<PP&E>                                2,172,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        2,172,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,989,686
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  6,934
<OTHER-SE>                             (817,124)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          2,172,562
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         66,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       28,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (66,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (66,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (66,136)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.01)

        


</TABLE>