alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Simon Boyce

### Deputy Director, Navajo Nation Washington, DC Office

Simon Boyce is the Deputy Director of the Navajo Nation Washington Office where he has represented the Navajo Nation in various capacities for nearly eight years, including as the Acting Executive Director.  Mr. Boyce focuses mostly on Energy and Natural Resources issues with a special emphasis on water rights, as well as telecommunication and economic development issues.  Prior to joining the Navajo Nation, Mr. Boyce represented a renewable energy and and recycling firm in New York state.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
# C_2012252EN.01000101.xml

| 22.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6561 — Cytec Industries/Umeco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 252/01

On 16 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6561. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6561. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10493]

Pursuant to section 7070(c)(1) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2018 (Div. K, Pub. L. 115-141), I hereby determine, by delegation from the Secretary of State, that the Government of Nauru has recognized the independence of, or has established diplomatic relations with, the Georgian territories of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali Region/South Ossetia.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and on the Department of State website and, along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be reported to Congress.                

Dated: July 30, 2018.

John J. Sullivan,

Deputy Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-17109 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
#### Rudolph GIBSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-153.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 17, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2012336EN.01000101.xml

| 6.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,75 % on 1 November 2012

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 November 2012

2012/C 336/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2975 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,82 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4597 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80315 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6398 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2072 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3705 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,226 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,22 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,127 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,534 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3251 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2491 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2969 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0557 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5685 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,583 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 416,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2351 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,097 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,523 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 485,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,96 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,487 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6714 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,846 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6352 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9402 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,682 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2975

JPY

Japanese yen

103,82

DKK

Danish krone

7,4597

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80315

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6398

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2072

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3705

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,226

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,22

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

PLN

Polish zloty

4,127

RON

Romanian leu

4,534

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3251

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2491

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2969

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0557

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5685

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,583

KRW

South Korean won

1 416,07

ZAR

South African rand

11,2351

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,097

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,523

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 485,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,96

PHP

Philippine peso

53,487

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6714

THB

Thai baht

39,846

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6352

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9402

INR

Indian rupee

69,682

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
**Exhibit23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-122136,333-122137, 333-03201, 333-71631, 333-75187, 333-75189 and 333-118033 on FormS-8 of our reports dated December 7, 2006, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule of Courier Corporationand subsidiaries (which report includes an explanatory paragraph concerning theadoption of SFAS 123R “Share-Based Payments” by application of the modifiedretrospective transition method), and management’s report on the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting appearing in and incorporated byreference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Courier Corporation for the yearended September 30, 2006.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPBoston, MassachusettsDecember 7, 2006

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 12, 2013 

# Order

Clerk August 12, 2013

146520 ( 93 )

LEON V. BONNER and MARILYN E.

BONNER,

Plaintiffs/Counter

- Defendants

Appellees, SC: 146520

v COA: 302677

Livingston CC: 09

- 024680

- CZ

CITY OF BRIGHTON,

Defendant/Counter

- Plaintiff

Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant/counter

- plaintiff

- appellant

to extend the time to file its appeal brief is GRANTED. The brief wi ll be accepted as

timely filed if received on or before September 23, 2013.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Phillip M. MOUNT, Appellee.

No. 69-533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Charles H. FLITMAN and Jill Arkin, Appellants, v. Edward R. McGLYNN et al., Appellees.

No. 66-965.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 31, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2012352EN.01000401.xml

| 16.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 November 2012

2012/C 352/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2756 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4587 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80545 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6480 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2042 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3595 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,566 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 284,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1600 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5383 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2982 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2350 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2782 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8876 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5727 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5622 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 388,09 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,4333 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9520 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5375 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 276,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9097 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,630 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3848 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,186 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6332 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9170 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7560 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2756

JPY

Japanese yen

103,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4587

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80545

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6480

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2042

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3595

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,566

HUF

Hungarian forint

284,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1600

RON

Romanian leu

4,5383

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2982

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2350

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2782

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8876

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5727

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5622

KRW

South Korean won

1 388,09

ZAR

South African rand

11,4333

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9520

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5375

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 276,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9097

PHP

Philippine peso

52,630

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3848

THB

Thai baht

39,186

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6332

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9170

INR

Indian rupee

69,7560

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Curtis Lee LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-374.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 24, 1972.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Russell H. McIntosh, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Order filed March 8, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00925-CV

____________

EXTERRA ENERGY, INC., Appellant

V.

SHAREWELL ENERGY SERVICES, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-32032

O R D E R

Appellant=s brief was due January 26, 2012. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with the clerk of this court on or before March 26, 

2012, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CN.05 **Contact:**  Jack Martin
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, JAN. 13, 2010 Census Bureau, Lockheed Martin Open Utah Call Center New 2010 Census Facility Creates 1,500 Jobs The U.S. Census Bureau today opened a call center in Sandy, Utah, that will assist callers with information on completing their 2010 Census questionnaires. The center is one of 11 national facilities that will serve as an information resource/hotline for U.S. residents. The Sandy professionals will answer questions about the process and completing the questionnaire and will follow-up with respondents if their returned form is not complete or potentially inaccurate. The facilities will be managed by Lockheed Martin. Its subcontractor partner, Vangent, will manage the hiring of 1,500 new employees. Each worker will take an oath for life to keep census information confidential. By law, the Census Bureau cannot share respondents' answers with any other government or law enforcement agency. Any violation of that oath is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and five years in prison. ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are used to distribute congressional seats to states and used to allocate more than $400 billion in federal funds to local, state and tribal governments each year. The 2010 Census questionnaire will be one of the shortest in history and consists of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. For more information, visit <http://2010.census.gov/2010census>.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Alfonso WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. GULF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-111.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 21, 1967.

Kelner & Lewis and Alan H. Dombrow-sky, Miami, for appellant.

Walton & Garrick, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellant, plaintiff below, fell and struck the rear of his head on the kitchen floor' tvhile‘Working at home. It was alleged that appellant lost the sight of both eyes as a result of this fall. At the time of the accident, appellant was insured by the appellee under a group policy which provided for payment of $3,000 for the loss of sight of both eyes due to accident. Appellant filed a suit against the appellee upon the policy and suffered a summary final judgment from which this appeal is taken.

Appellee suggests two bases for the summary judgment. First, that there is no genuine issue as to the fact that plaintiff’s pre-existing diabetic condition was the cause, or át least the partial cause, of the loss of sight. Secondly, that the policy requires written notice of injury within 20 days and written proof of claim within 90 days, and failure to comply with the notice requirements defeats the right to benefits.

The proofs before the trial court on the motion of the appellee for summary judgment upon the issue of the cause for the loss of sight consists of a deposition of one doctor and an affidavit of another doctor. Each of these doctors treated the appellant and, in fact, are members of the same clinic. The deposition and affidavit, while not diametrically opposed, are susceptible of interpretations which present a conflict on the essential fact of whether appellant’s visual loss was a direct result of the accident. We think that under the rules announced by the Supreme Court of Florida in Holl v. Talcott, Fla. 1966, 191 So.2d 40 and subsequent cases, a summary final judgment may not be entered on this issue.

*222We have examined the proofs as to the defense of failure to give notice of the accident and find that this defense is not conclusively established in the record. See Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla. 1965, 175 So.2d 780.

Reversed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2026 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

any prizes or awards won in competition in the Olympic Games or 

the Paralympic Games. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2014 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. KIRK, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. WICKER, Mr. HOEVEN, and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income any prizes or awards won in competition in the Olympic Games or the Paralympic Games. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MEDALS AND 

4 USOC PRIZE MONEY EXCLUDED FROM GROSS 

5 INCOME. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 74 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following new subsection: 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2026 IS

1 ‘‘(d) EXCEPTION FOR OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC

2 MEDALS AND PRIZES.—Gross income shall not include the 

3 value of any medal awarded in, or any prize money re4 ceived from the United States Olympic Committee on ac5 count of, competition in the Olympic Games or Paralympic 

6 Games.’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to prizes and awards received after 

9 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
258 La. 247

#### Fay ALLEN and Mrs. Thelma Allen Wise v. PAGGI BROTHERS OIL COMPANY.

No. 51226.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 29, 1971.

In re: Fay Allen and Mrs. Thelma Allen Wise applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches. 244 So.2d 116.

Writ denied. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.
No. 11344.

#### City of Mansfield *v.*Newlon.

Decided November 30, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Richland county.

*Mr. Glenn M. Cummings,*city solicitor, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Douglass & Mengert,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/09/2010 08:39 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Nagelhout/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael | |Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |08/09/2010 05:17 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |revised SI RICE NESHAP preamble/reg | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------|

Cortney, Attached is the revised preamble/reg that includes additional language discussed during the call today. As requested I'm also attaching a redline/strikeout against what was initially sent to OMB. (See attached file: Final SI RICE NESHAP Preamble-Reg 8-9-10 afternoon redline.doc)(See attached file: Final SI RICE NESHAP Preamble-Reg 8-9-10 afternoon.doc) Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov