alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 11, 2012.

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THALIA DE SANTIAGO, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00664-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to withdraw notice of appeal. 

Having considered the motion the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED.

We order appellant to pay the costs incurred by this appeal.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2048 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2048

 To include New Zealand in the list of foreign states whose nationals 
   are eligible for admission into the United States as E-1 and E-2 
 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the 
                       Government of New Zealand.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 26, 2014

 Ms. Hirono (for herself, Mr. Lee, Mr. McCain, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Schumer, 
 and Mrs. Murray) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
             and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include New Zealand in the list of foreign states whose nationals 
   are eligible for admission into the United States as E-1 and E-2 
 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the 
                       Government of New Zealand.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Encouraging Trade and Investment 
from New Zealand Act''.

SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS.

    For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 101(a)(15)(E) of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), New 
Zealand shall be considered to be a foreign state described in such 
section if the Government of New Zealand provides similar nonimmigrant 
status to nationals of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012125EN.01000101.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 April 2012

2012/C 125/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3229 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4385 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81530 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9024 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2014 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5880 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,870 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 287,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6995 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1788 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3878 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3280 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2679 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2996 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2652 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6168 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6396 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 499,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2584 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3200 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5155 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 151,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0220 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,923 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,8750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,719 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4916 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3961 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,4650 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3229

JPY

Japanese yen

106,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4385

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81530

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9024

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2014

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5880

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,870

HUF

Hungarian forint

287,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6995

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1788

RON

Romanian leu

4,3878

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3280

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2679

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2996

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2652

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6168

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6396

KRW

South Korean won

1 499,22

ZAR

South African rand

10,2584

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3200

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5155

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 151,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0220

PHP

Philippine peso

55,923

RUB

Russian rouble

38,8750

THB

Thai baht

40,719

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4916

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3961

INR

Indian rupee

69,4650

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 

AMENDED & RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF JANUARY 2012 

This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement among Pacific Continental Bank, Pacific Continental Corporation and Casey Hogan, as amended
and restated as of January 31, 2012 (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 19th day of July, 2016. 
 In
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby expressly acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows, effective as
of the date hereof: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 9(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: 

“If, during the Term, the Bank or Corporation terminates Executive’s employment without Cause, or Executive terminates his employment
for Good Reason (defined below), the Bank will pay Executive: 
 (1) the base salary he would have been entitled to if his employment had not
terminated for a period of twelve months, and 
 (2) the greater of (a) $55,000 and (b) the amount of Executive’s most recent
annual cash incentive compensation payout pursuant to Section 6, in either case payable on the 90th day following termination of employment, and 

(3) if Executive timely elects to continue Executive’s medical, dental and vision benefits under COBRA (including, if applicable,
continuation of coverage for Executive’s spouse and dependents), then the entire amount of the monthly premium under COBRA under the Bank’s group plans for active employees and their dependents, if applicable, as along as Executive (or his
spouse and dependents, if applicable) remains eligible for COBRA, but not beyond twelve months following termination of employment, 

(collectively, the “Termination Payments”), provided that Executive shall be entitled to the payment and benefits described above if
and only if, within ninety (90) days after such termination of employment, Executive has executed and delivered to the Bank and Corporation the General Release substantially in form and substance as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto
and the General Release has become effective, and only so long as Executive has not breached the provisions of the General Release or breached the provisions of Sections 11 or 12 below, and any statutory or other rights that Executive may have to
revoke the General Release has expired prior to the end of the 90-day period.” 
 2. Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect. 
 [Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this First Amendment to the Agreement
in counterparts on the date first above written. 
 EXECUTIVE: 

 

	
	
	/s/ Casey Hogan
	Casey Hogan


 PACIFIC CONTINENTAL BANK: 

 

	
	
	
	/s/ Robert A. Ballin
	 By: Robert A. Ballin

Chairman of the Board



 PACIFIC CONTINENTAL CORPORATION: 

 

	
	
	
	/s/ Robert A. Ballin
	 By: Robert A. Ballin

Chairman of the Board
#### BADON’S EMPLOYMENT, INC. v. Dean R. SMITH.

No. 61500.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Dean R. Smith, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 353 So.2d 320.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0576

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF

STRATIS SYLVYN,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 and

CAMEO SCHERI HOWARD-SYLVYN,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Stratis Sylvyn, to all counsel of

record. and to the Honorable Gregory R. Todd, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2020

04/29/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0576
EXHIBIT 31.2
       (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures, and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
    Date: May 12, 2008
    /s/ BRIAN C. HENRYBrian C. HenryChief Financial Officer
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases African American
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.40 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JULY 5, 2012 Who's Black in America? Live on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" "America By the Numbers" Segment The size of the U.S. black population was 44 million as of July 1, 2011. Find out more on Friday, July 6, at approximately 8:30 a.m. EDT as Nicholas Jones, chief of the Racial Statistics Branch at the U.S. Census Bureau, discusses statistics about the black population. Each Friday, C-SPAN's "America By the Numbers" segment features information from the federal statistical system. The program highlights the trends and allows the public to call in or email their views.  More information on previous C-SPAN programs is available at <https://www.census.gov/newsroom/cspan.html>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Exhibit 12   American General Finance, Inc. and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges    Years Ended December 31,(dollars in thousands)20082007200620052004Earnings:
(Loss) income before provision
for income taxes$ (950,693)$   142,043$   638,621$   820,317$   693,671Interest expense1,254,0941,257,1881,175,210884,971636,304Implicit interest in rents27,09321,83320,63119,31418,040Total earnings$   330,494$1,421,064$1,834,462$1,724,602$1,348,015Fixed charges:
Interest expense$1,254,094$1,257,188$1,175,210$   884,971$   636,304Implicit interest in rents27,09321,83320,63119,31418,040Total fixed charges$1,281,187$1,279,021$1,195,841$   904,285$   654,344Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges*0.261.111.531.912.06  * Earnings were inadequate to cover total fixed charges by $950.7 million in 2008.   153
# C_2012134EN.01000102.xml

| 8.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6536 — CVC/Ahlsell)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 134/02

On 30 April 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6536. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6536. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2012275EN.01000101.xml

| 12.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6664 — Al Safi Danone/NDL International/ND Logistics LLC JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 275/01

On 4 September 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6664. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6664. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 10.53

COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

This Restricted Stock Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of[Date], between COUNTRYWIDE
FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), andName(the "Director").

In
accordance with the Countrywide Financial Corporation 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (the "EIP") and the Countrywide Financial Corporation Non-Employee Directors' Fee Plan
(the "Fee Plan"), the Company has awarded to the Director[Shares]shares of the Company's common stock (the "Restricted
Shares") upon the terms and conditions described in this Agreement, the EIP and the Fee Plan. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the EIP.

1

---





2

---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Company has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf by a duly authorized officer and Director has
executed this Agreement.

|DIRECTOR:               |  | COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|(Printed Name)          |  | By:                              
|(Signature)             |  |                                  
|(Address)               |  |                                  
|(City, State, Zip Code) |  |                                  
|Date                    |  |                                  

3

---



QuickLinks
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERTHA ALICIA REYNOSO DE

TORO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72103

Agency No. A056-510-802

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2011** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Bertha Alicia Reynoso de Toro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding her inadmissible for engaging

in alien smuggling. We dismiss the petition for review.

FILED

APR 13 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72103

We lack jurisdiction to review Reynoso de Toro’s contention that she is

eligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(11) because she

failed to exhaust her administrative remedies by raising this contention before the

BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CN.37 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, MARCH 30, 2010 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Director Encourages D.C. Area Residents to Return Census Forms at Iconic Ben's Chili Bowl on National Census Day As of today, the national mail back participation rate is 50 percent. Washington, D.C., ranks slightly behind the national average, at 44 percent. The Census Bureau recently launched its "Take 10" program, which features interactive maps showing 2010 Census mail participation rates. Communities across the region can track the percentage of households mailing in their census forms at http://2010census.gov/2010census/take10map. The data are updated daily at 4 p.m.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Ellis Henry WINDSOR, a/k/a Elixis Henry Windsor, a/k/a Shorty Long, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-968.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 20, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB00-CN.12**
**Contact:**  RCC Media Specialist														Phone Number

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2000

## Census Bureau Making Sure Every Household in (Region/City) Receives A Census 2000 Questionnaire

To ensure that a completed census questionnaire is obtained from every housing unit in the nation, the Census Bureau first must make sure that every housing unit, in the nation receives a census questionnaire. Three methods will be used to achieve this goal.

In mid-March the U.S. Postal Service will deliver census questionnaires by regular mail to more than 80 percent of all households. Householders are asked to mail their forms back promptly.

In areas where the addresses used for mail delivery are predominantly noncity-style (i.e., rural routes, post office boxes, etc.), census enumerators will leave self-addressed and postage-paid census questionnaires at each housing unit for the householder to complete and mail back. As enumerators deliver these questionnaires, they also will make any necessary corrections, additions or deletions to census maps and address lists. This operation will be conducted in March 2000.

"Under this method, we'll have enumerators from (your local area) doing the kind of detail work needed to ensure that Census 2000 is the most accurate and fairest count ever," said (name), (city) regional census center director. "We encourage all persons to cooperate fully with the census worker who comes to their door."

Finally, in sparsely settled or remote areas, census workers will conduct interviews, fill out a questionnaire for each housing unit, add the unit to an address list and spot it on a census map. This operation will take place from March through April and involves a much smaller percentage of the population.

"Census 2000's goal is to count every resident in the United States and its island areas," said Kenneth Prewitt, Census Bureau director.  "Using these three methods, we enhance our capability of doing just that."

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov