36878 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2018 / Notices 

16This rate is applicable to the Vinh Hoan Group 

which includes: Vinh Hoan, Van Duc, and VDTG. 

17 Includes the trade name Anvifish Co., Ltd. 

18This rate is also applicable to QVD Dong Thap 

Food Co., Ltd. (Dong Thap) and Thuan Hung Co., 

Ltd. (THUFICO). In the second review of this order, 

Commerce found QVD, Dong Thap and THUFICO 

to be a single entity, and because there has been no 

evidence submitted on the record of this review that 

calls this determination into question, we continue 

to find these companies to be part of a single entity. 

Therefore, we will assign this rate to the companies 

in the single entity. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 71 FR 53387 (September 11, 2006). 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 83 FR 9284 

(March 5, 2018). 2See GEO’s Request for Review, dated March 30, 

2018. 3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 

19215 (May 2, 2018). 4See Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review, dated May 30, 2018. 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(dollars per 

kilogram) 

Vinh Hoan Corporation 16 .................................................................................................................................................................... 0.13 

Anvifish Joint Stock Company 17 ......................................................................................................................................................... 2.39 

An Giang Agriculture and Food Import-Export Joint Stock Company ................................................................................................ 1.28 

Asia Commerce Fisheries Joint Stock Company ................................................................................................................................ 1.28 

Binh An Seafood Joint Stock Company .............................................................................................................................................. 1.28 

Cadovimex II Seafood Import-Export and Processing Joint Stock Company .................................................................................... 1.28 

Hiep Thanh Seafood Joint Stock Company ........................................................................................................................................ 1.28 

Hung Vuong Corporation ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1.28 

Nam Viet Corporation .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1.28 

NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company ................................................................................................................................................ 1.28 

QVD Food Company Ltd 18 ................................................................................................................................................................. 1.28 

Saigon Mekong Fishery Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................... 1.28 

Southern Fisheries Industries Company Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... 1.28 

Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation ...................................................................................................................................................... 1.28 

Accordingly, Commerce will continue 

the suspension of liquidation of the 

subject merchandise pending the 

expiration of the period of appeal or, if 

appealed, pending a final and 

conclusive court decision. In the event 

the Court’s ruling is not appealed or, if 

appealed, upheld by the CAFC, 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to assess 

antidumping duties on unliquidated 

entries of subject merchandise exported 

by the companies mentioned above 

using the assessment rate calculated by 

Commerce in the AR8 Remand Results 

and listed above. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Unless the applicable cash deposit 

rates have been superseded by cash 

deposit rates calculated in an 

intervening administrative review of the 

AD order on frozen fish fillets from 

Vietnam, Commerce will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection to 

require a cash deposit for estimated AD 

duties at the rate noted above for each 

specified exporter and producer 

combination, for entries of subject 

merchandise, entered or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption, on or 

after June 3, 2018. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(e), 

751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: July 20, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16338 Filed 7–30–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–836] 

Glycine From the People’s Republic of 

China: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 

2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the People’s Republic of China (China) 

for the period March 1, 2017, through 

February 28, 2018, based on the timely 

withdrawal of the request for review. 

DATES: Applicable July 31, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Edythe Artman or John Drury, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3931 or (202) 482–0195, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 5, 2018, Commerce 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

China in the Federal Register. The 

period of review covers March 1, 2017, 

through February 28, 2018.1 On March 

30, 2018, in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 

351.213(b), Commerce received a timely 

request from GEO Specialty Chemicals, 

Inc. (GEO), a domestic producer of 

glycine, to conduct an administrative 

review of the order with respect to 

entries of subject merchandise made by 

Kumar Industries, Rudraa International, 

Salvi Chemical Industries, Avid 

Organics Pvt. Ltd., and Baoding 

Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd.2 On 

May 2, 2018, pursuant to this request, in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we 

initiated a review of those companies.3

On May 30, 2018, GEO filed a timely 

withdrawal of its request of review for 

each of the five companies.4 No other 

party requested an administrative 

review of this order. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the party 

that requested the review withdraws the 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2018 / Notices 36879 

1See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper 

Review; 2011–2012, 79 FR 19053 (April 7, 2014) 

(AR9 Final Results). 

2See Amended Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2010–2011, 79 FR 

37714 (July 2, 2014) (AR9 Amended Final Results) 

and accompanying Ministerial Error Memorandum. 

3These include An Giang Fisheries Import and 

Export Joint Stock Company, Asia Commerce 

Fisheries Joint Stock Company, Cuu Long Fish Joint 

Stock Company, Hiep Thanh Seafood Joint Stock 

Company, International Development and 

Investment Corporation, NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock 

Company, QVD Food Company Ltd., Southern 

Fishery Industries Company, Ltd., and Vinh Hoan 

Corporation (collectively Agifish et al.). 

4Catfish Farmers of America and the following 

individual U.S. catfish processors: America’s Catch, 

Consolidated Catfish Companies, LLC dba Country 

Select Catfish, Delta Pride Catfish, Inc., Harvest 

Select Catfish, Inc., Heartland Catfish Company, 

Pride of the Pond, and Simmons Farm Raised 

Catfish, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners). 

5See An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint 

Stock Company et al. v. United States, Court No. 

14–00109, Slip Op. 16–55 (CIT June 7, 2016). 

6 Vinh Hoan was one of two mandatory 

respondents selected by Commerce. (Vinh Hoan) 

includes Vinh Hoan Corporation and its affiliates 

Van Duc Food Export Joint Company and Van Duc 

Tien Giang (VDTG). 

7See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock 

Company et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 

14–00109, and Slip Op. 16–55, dated February 9, 

2017 (First Remand Results). 

8 Id. 

9See An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint 

Stock Company et al. v. United States, Consol. 

Court No. 14–00109, Slip Op. 17–00082 (July 10, 

2017) (An Giang Fisheries). 

10See Vinh Hoan Corporation et al. v. United 

States, Court No. 14–00109, Slip Op. 17–82 (CIT 

July 10, 2017). 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. As noted above, 

GEO withdrew its request for review by 

the 90-day deadline and no other party 

requested an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order. 

Accordingly, we are rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

China for the period 

March 1, 2017, through February 28, 

2018, in its entirety, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of glycine from China. 

Antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to 

issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: July 23, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16336 Filed 7–30–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–801] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice 

of Court Decisions Not in Harmony 

With Final Results of Administrative 

Review and Notice of Amended Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On May 24, 2018, the United 

States Court of International Trade 

(Court) issued final judgments in An 

Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint 

Stock Company et al. v. United States, 

Consol. Court No. 14–00109, sustaining 

the Department of Commerce’s 

(Commerce) remand results for the 

ninth administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen fish fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) covering 

the period of review (POR) August 1, 

2011, through July 31, 2012. Commerce 

is notifying the public that the Court’s 

final judgment is not in harmony with 

Commerce’s final results of the 

administrative review, and that 

Commerce is amending the final results 

with respect to certain exporters. 

DATES: Applicable June 3, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2243. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 7, 2014, Commerce issued 

its AR9 Final Results.1 On July 2, 2014, 

Commerce issued its AR9 Amended 

Final Results.2 Agifish et al.3 and the 

petitioners 4 timely filed complaints 

with the Court and challenged certain 

aspects of the AR9 Amended Final 

Results. On June 7, 2015, the Court 

remanded Commerce’s AR9 Amended 

Final Results.5

In the first remand, in accordance 

with the Court’s instructions, Commerce 

reconsidered its selection of the 

surrogate value (SV) for rice husk and 

provided further explanation 

concerning the cap to the fish oil byproduct offset in Vinh Hoan 

Corporation’s 6 margin calculation.7

Additionally, and in accordance with 

the Court’s instructions, Commerce 

made changes to Vinh Hoan’s margin 

calculation, specifically, by adjusting 

the denominators for Vinh Hoan’s 

factors of production (FOPs) to exclude 

water weight, and subsequently 

recalculating Vinh Hoan’s net U.S. price 

of sales for subject merchandise on a net 

weight basis exclusive of water weight.8

The Court upheld our findings on all 

but one of these issues, i.e., the fish oil 

by-product offset.9

On July 10, 2017, the Court remanded 

Commerce’s First Remand Results.10 In 

the second remand, in accordance with 

the Court’s instructions, Commerce 

provided further explanation with 

respect to the calculated fish oil byVerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jul 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES