alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re the ESTATE of Grace ZALOUDEK, Deceased.

No. 77-1606.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 4, 1978.

Robert M. Curtis, of Saunders, Curtis, Ginestra & Gore, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

John V. Russell, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellee-Richard M. Sauls.

Robert A. Ware, of English, McCaughan & O’Bryan, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Landmark First Nat. Bank of Fort Lauder-dale.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellants bring for our review an order of the trial court which quashed a subpoena duces tecum. They have designated their appeal as being an interlocutory appeal and we recognize it as such. We derive our authority for interlocutory review from Fla. *1327App. Rule 4.2. In this probate matter Fla. Probate and Guardianship Rule 5.100 also defines the right of appeal. In neither rule does a party have the right to interlocutory appeal from a non-final order in a probate action. *In re Estate of Baker,*327 So.2d 205 (Fla.1976); *Tyler v. Huggins,*175 So.2d 239 (Fla. 2 DCA 1965); *In re Estate of Leterman,*238 So.2d 695 (Fla. 3 DCA 1970); *Johnson v. General Motors Corp.,*350 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 4 DCA 1977).

Appeal DISMISSED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and MOORE, J., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of World Air Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.

                                                /s/ Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr.
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr.
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                of World Air Holdings, Inc.

May 13, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          50,335
<SECURITIES>                                    34,899
<RECEIVABLES>                                       29
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,943
<PP&E>                                           4,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,729)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,577
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,127
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   446
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,720)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.30)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 16, 2017

t0613 

# Order

Clerk June 16, 2017

155399

In re MORFORD/ELLISON

- MORFORD,

Minors. SC: 155399

COA: 332541

Monroe CC Family Division:

14

- 023167

- NA

_____________________________________/

By order of March 31, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the December 22,

2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in In

re Hicks/Brown, Mino rs (Docket No. 153786). On order of the Court, the case having

been decided on May 8, 2017, ___ Mich ___ (2017), the application is again considered,

and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be

reviewed by this Co urt.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

WISBEN SANON , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D22

- 71 3

[ April 12, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Lawrence M

. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562017CF001914

. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach , for appellant

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant Attor ney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

F ORST , J

. Appellant Wisben Sanon appeals his conviction for several sexual assault crimes, raising two arguments on appeal. First , Sanon argues his conviction by a six

- person jury violated his rights under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution . We have recently addressed this issue and affirm without discussion. See Guzman v. State
, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

Second, Sanon contends the State made improper rebuttal closing argument when it showed the jury a placard with the reasonable doubt instruction juxtaposed with the phrase “ motive plus opportunity is not reasonable doubt

. ” The State explained this was a r eference to Sanon’s defense that he had been fram ed for the charged crimes and the jury should find reasonable doubt attributable to the accusers’ motive and opportunity to plant damaging evidence

. We review a trial court’s control of prosecutorial clos ing co mments for abuse of discretion. Narcisse v. State , 166 So. 3d 954, 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)

. I n exercising that discretion, trial courts will properly permit theparties “wide latitude in closing argument to a jury

. ” Stephens v. State
, 975 So. 2d 4 05, 421 (Fla. 2007)

.
As a response to Sanon’s primary defense, the State’s rebuttal closing argument was well within that latitude. See State v. Compo , 651 So. 2d 127, 130 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (“Fundamental notions of fairness require[] that the state be allowed to comment on . . . issues raised by the defendant.”)

. Moreover, the State informed the jury that the objected

- to statement “is obviously not part of the instruction [on reasonable doubt]

. ”

Upon further defense objection , the trial cour t clarified that the prosecution was merel y emphasizing what was and what was not in the agreed

- upon reasonable doubt jury instruction, with the court informing the jury “what is and what isn’t reasonable doubt, ladies and gentlemen, will ultimately be for you to decide.” The trial court’s comments, on top of the State ’s explanation , “ remov [ed] any question of an improper taint on the jury ’ s understanding of the burden of proof .” Thomas v. State , 726 So. 2d 369, 372 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We accordingly fi nd no error

. Affirmed

.

G ROSS and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CONTINENTAL MATERIALS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report of Continental Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Gidwitz, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph J. Sum, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.

 

Date: March 18, 2013

 
|   | By:    | /s/   James G. Gidwitz                       |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | James   G. Gidwitz                           |
|   |   | Chairman   of the Board and                  |
|   |   | Chief   Executive Officer                    |
|   |   |                                         |
|   |   |                                         |
|   | By:    | /s/   Joseph J. Sum                          |
|   |   | Joseph   J. Sum                              |
|   |   | Vice   President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification accompanies the issuer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-4751 and IC-25967, dated November 16, 2007.

 

----
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  First Quarter 2001 and 2000


                              First      First    Standard   Standard
Age of householder           Quarter    Quarter   error on   error on
                                 2001       2000  2001 rate difference

United States..............      67.5       67.1        0.2        0.2

    Less than 25 years.....      21.0       20.8        0.6        0.9
    25 to 29 years.........      37.3       37.5        0.7        0.9
    30 to 34 years.........      55.3       54.8        0.6        0.8
    35 to 39 years.........      65.2       63.8        0.5        0.8
    40 to 44 years.........      70.8       70.7        0.5        0.7
    45 to 49 years.........      74.9       74.1        0.5        0.7
    50 to 54 years.........      78.3       78.2        0.5        0.7
    55 to 59 years.........      80.1       81.0        0.6        0.8
    60 to 64 years.........      81.7       80.6        0.6        0.8
    65 to 69 years.........      82.4       83.3        0.6        0.8
    70 to 74 years.........      83.9       83.4        0.6        0.8
    75 years and over......      78.1       76.7        0.5        0.7

      Less than 35 years...      40.4       40.5        0.4        0.5
      35 to 44 years.......      68.1       67.3        0.4        0.5
      45 to 54 years.......      76.5       76.0        0.4        0.5
      55 to 64 years.......      80.8       80.8        0.4        0.6
      65 years and over....      80.7       80.1        0.3        0.5
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  Fourth Quarter 1997 and 1996

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                    Fourth    Fourth   Standard
                                   quarter   quarter   error on  Standard     1997
Type                                 1997      1996      1997    error on   Percent
                                   estimate  estimate  estimate difference  of total

All housing units.................  115,892   114,555       237        336       100

  Occupied........................  102,624   101,264       246        348        89
    Owner occupied................   67,424    66,277       241        340        58
    Renter occupied...............   35,200    34,987       198        280        30

  Vacant..........................   13,268    13,291       131        185        11
    Year-round vacant.............   10,078     9,979       115        162         9
      For rent....................    2,966     2,950        64         90         3
      For sale only...............    1,187     1,146        40         57         1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy..........      813       763        34         47         1
      Held off market.............    5,112     5,120        83        118         4
        For occasional use........    1,805     1,742        50         70         2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence elsewhere.      793       877        33         48         1
        For other reasons.........    2,514     2,501        59         83         2

    Seasonal vacant...............    3,190     3,312        66         94         3
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1989
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1989
<CASH>                                           6,097
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,620
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       406,761
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,097
<SALES>                                        224,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   222,342
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
Order entered July 30, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-15-00888-CV

IN RE AMY E. DAVIS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 06-06944



### ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Just ice Bridges and Justice Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATIONS








Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








The
undersigned, Bernhard Steiner and Ann B. Ruple, in their capacities as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Clean Diesel
Technologies, Inc. (the “Registrant”) do each hereby certify with respect to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended September
30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this Report.








/s/  Bernhard
Steiner





Bernhard
Steiner


President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director


November
10, 2008








/s/  Ann B.
Ruple





Ann
B. Ruple


Chief
Financial Officer, Vice President and Treasurer


November
10, 2008





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), this certification
accompanies the Report and shall not, except to the extent required by the Act,
be deemed filed by Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be
retained by Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11523.

#### Uebbing, Trustee, *v.*Koester, Trustee, et al.

Decided February 8, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. L. S. Litzler*and *Messrs. Hamilton & Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Walter D. Meals*and

*565*Messrs. Dawley & Meals,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Registration Statement on Form
S-1 of our report dated August 23, 2000, relating to the financial statements of
Cerus Limited (a company in the development stage) at December 31, 1998 and
1999, for the two years then ended and for the cumulative period from
December 16, 1997 (date of inception) to December 31, 1999, which appear in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the
headings "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Limerick, Ireland
August 25, 2000
# C_2012079EN.01000401.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 March 2012

2012/C 79/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3116 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4356 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82950 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8560 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2070 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,511 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 290,64 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6970 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1300 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3823 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3583 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2401 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2990 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1818 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5942 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6529 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 475,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9661 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2926 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5368 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 997,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0067 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,387 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,4790 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,332 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3617 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5700 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,7570 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3116

JPY

Japanese yen

109,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4356

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82950

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8560

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2070

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,511

HUF

Hungarian forint

290,64

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6970

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1300

RON

Romanian leu

4,3823

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3583

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2401

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2990

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1818

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5942

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6529

KRW

South Korean won

1 475,65

ZAR

South African rand

9,9661

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2926

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5368

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 997,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0067

PHP

Philippine peso

56,387

RUB

Russian rouble

38,4790

THB

Thai baht

40,332

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3617

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5700

INR

Indian rupee

65,7570

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Bernie APPELBAUM, Relator, v. Honorable Alfonso SEPE, Judge of the Circuit Court, Criminal Division, in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-1187.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 23, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.