alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7519

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABBAS SADEGH, a/k/a Abby, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-95-113-A) Submitted: February 26, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999 Before ERVIN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abbas Sadegh, Appellant Pro Se. Justin W. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is dated September 17, 1998, the district court’s records show it was entered on the docket sheet on September 18, 1998, which is the date we take as the effective date of the court’s order. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, 79(a). 2 PER CURIAM: Abbas Sadegh appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel to prepare a successive motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sadegh , No. CR-95-113-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

August 26, 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Ford Motor Company regarding Tier 3

FROM: Michael Olechiw

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

This memo documents a meeting held on August 26, 2013 between representatives of Ford 

Motor Company and EPA to discuss Tier 3.

The agenda as well as the attendees are shown below. The purpose of the meeting was to clarify

points in the Tier 3 rule.

Attendees:

Glen Passavant EPA

Dominic DiCicco Ford

Jeff Glodich Ford

Dan Adsit Ford

Michael Olechiw EPA

Will Ruona Ford

Tony Fernandez EPA

John Hedges Ford

Ken Middleton Ford

Joe McDonald EPA (by phone)

Agenda

1. Welcome and Introductions

2. Review of Ford’s comments

3. Focus topics

a. Sulfur Case

b. R-Factor

c. Lead time / program start

d. US06 PM

4. Next steps
```

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                   ------------------------------------------

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Richard A. Wisot, the chief
financial officer of Transpro, Inc. (the "issuer"), does hereby certify that the
report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the "report") fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Richard A. Wisot
--------------------
Richard A. Wisot
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)
Transpro, Inc.
November 11, 2004

                                       23
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<CIK>                           0000949240
<NAME>                          WORLD AIRWAYS
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                           7,776
<SECURITIES>                                     1,296
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                       331
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,675
<PP&E>                                          95,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,328
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      (8,030)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,480
<SALES>                                         67,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,529
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     43
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 43
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        43
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1.2  AMENDMENT AND RENEWAL OF SERVICE CONTRACT NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY AND [NAME OF COMPANY]   This Amendment and Renewal of Service Contract (Agreement) is made and entered into as of the 31st of December 2007, by and between Northeast Utilities Service Company (Service Company) and [name of company] (Associate Company).  WHEREAS, under the terms of the Service Contract by and between Service Company and Associate Company, Service Company is willing to render certain services to Associate Company at cost, determined in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (the 35 Act); and  WHEREAS, the 35 Act was repealed in 2006, and jurisdiction over certain of Service Companys activities was transferred from the SEC to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under the Federal Power Act, as amended (the Act), including the provision of services for affiliated companies at cost; and  WHEREAS, the Service Contract between Service Company and Associate Company expires as of December 31, 2007; and  WHEREAS, both parties deem it to be in the their best interests to renew the Service Contract for an additional period of one year on the same terms and conditions and in accordance with the requirements of FERC.  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements herein contained, it is agreed as follows:  1. Amendment of Service Contract.  The Service Contract between Service Company and Associate Company is hereby amended as follows:  (a) All references to the Act in the Service Contract and attachments shall be deemed to refer to the Federal Power Act.  (b) The reference to the SEC in Section 4 of the Service Contract shall be deleted and replaced with FERC.  (c) The phrase Rule 91 of the SEC contained in Section 3 of the Service Contract and on Appendix A shall be replaced with the phrase applicable rules and requirements of FERC.   2. Renewal of Service Contract.  (a) The Service Contract between Service Company and Associate Company, as heretofore amended, is hereby renewed as of January 1, 2008, for a period of one year.  (b) Except as modified and amended by this Agreement, all terms and conditions of the Service Contract shall continue in full force and effect during such renewal period.   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, all as of the date first above written.  NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY   Attest: By:____________________________________  Name:  Title:  __________________________ Assistant Secretary    [NAME OF COMPANY]   Attest: By: _________________________________ Name: Title:  ______________________________ Assistant Secretary
No. 11497.

#### The State, ex rel. Meyer, *v.*Buckingham.

Decided January 25, 1910.

Error *555to Circuit Court of Putnam county.

*Mr. W. W. Sutton*and *Mr. George Frits,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. E. F. Weiser,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Spear, Davis, Spiauck and Price, JJ., concur.
#### ALICE McLOUGHLIN v. PHILADELPHIA.

APPEAL BY PLAINTIFF FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 2 OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY.

Argued April 10, 1891

Decided April 21, 1891.

Where the owner of a building abutting upon a city street was in the habit of keeping heavy window screens leaning unfastened against the front of his building, and the screens fell and injured a child on. the sidewalk, the municipality was not liable for such injury.*

*81Before Paxson, C. J., Green, Clark McCollum and. Mitchell, JJ.

No. 264 January Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 88 June Term 1888, C. P. No. 2.

On July 17, 1888, Alice McLoughlin, by her next friend Thomas McLoughlin, brought trespass against the city of Philadelphia, to recover for personal injuries received. Issue.

At the trial, on November 28, 1890, testimony was introduced to show that on April 17, 1888, at Nineteenth and Carpenter streets, the plaintiff, then a child of five years of age, was lawfully upon the sidewalk, in company with another child, and was injured by the falling upon her of certain iron-wire window screens, left upon the sidewalk by one T. W. Patchell, the proprietor of a cigar store. The screens, two together, had been leaning unfastened against the wall of the house. In the daytime, they were habitually kept standing against the wall, and at night were put upon the windows. A witness testified to finding the screens fallen upon the plaintiff, but there was no testimony showing the cause of their fall. The plaintiff was severely injured.

At the close of the plaintiff’s testimony, the court, Hare, P. J., on his own motion entered a judgment of nonsuit, with leave, etc. A rule to show cause why the judgment should not be lifted having been argued, the rule was discharged; whereupon, the plaintiff took this appeal, assigning the orders entering said judgment and discharging said rule, for error.

*Mr. Francis Q. Q-allager,*for the appellant.

Counsel cited: Newlin Tp. v. Davis, 77 Pa. 317; Providence v. Clapp, 17 How. 161; Dillon on Mun. Corp., §§1012-1013; Norristown v. Moyer, 67 Pa. 355; Monongahela City v. Fischer, 111 Pa. 9; Fritsch v. Allegheny City, 91 Pa. 226; McLaughlin v. Corry, 77 Pa. 109; Scott Tp. v. Montgomery, 95 Pa. 444; North Manheim Tp. v. Arnold, 119 Pa. 380; Born v. Plankroad Co., 101 Pa. 334; West Chester R. Co. v. McElwee, 67 Pa. 311.

*Mr. Charles B. McMichael*and *Mr. Charles F.*Warwick, for the appellee, were not heard.

*82In the brief filed, counsel cited: King v. Thompson, 87 Pa. 365; Burns v. Bradford City, 137 Pa. 361.

*

 Cf. Collins v. Leafey, 124 Pa. 203.

Per Curiam:

There was nothing in this case to show any liability on the part of the city. The nonsuit was properly entered.

Judgment affirmed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1951 

To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

Liability Act of 1980 to make responsible parties liable for certain 

costs relating to the release of pollutants or contaminants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2014 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 

and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 to make responsible 

parties liable for certain costs relating to the release 

of pollutants or contaminants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY. 

4 Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental 

5 Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 

6 U.S.C. 9607(a)) is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(or pollutant or contaminant 

8 if the President takes any response measure under 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1951 IS

1 section 104(a) with respect to the pollutant or con2 taminant)’’ after ‘‘hazardous substance’’ each place 

3 it appears; 

4 (2) by inserting ‘‘(or pollutants or contaminants 

5 if the President takes any response measure under 

6 section 104(a) with respect to the pollutants or con7 taminants)’’ after ‘‘hazardous substances’’ each 

8 place it appears; and 

9 (3) in paragraph (4)— 

10 (A) by striking subparagraph (C); 

11 (B) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as 

12 subparagraph (C); 

13 (C) in subparagraph (C) (as so redesig14 nated) by striking the period at the end and in15 serting ‘‘; and’’; and 

16 (D) by adding at the following: 

17 ‘‘(D) except a person described in para18 graphs (2) through this paragraph who engages 

19 in conduct prohibited under those paragraphs 

20 with respect to pollutants or contaminants, 

21 damages for injury to, destruction of, or loss of 

22 natural resources, including the reasonable 

23 costs of assessing the injury, destruction, or 

24 loss resulting from the release.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
z AQB Home 

z Public Notices 

z Site Map 

z Contact Us 

z FAQs 

 

 

Air Quality Bureau 

 

 

The mission of the New Mexico Environment Department's Air Quality Bureau (AQB) is to protect the inhabitants

and natural beauty of New Mexico by preventing the deterioration of air quality. 

This includes: 

z strategic planning to ensure that all air quality standards are met and maintained 

z issuing air quality Construction and Operating Permits 

z enforcing air quality regulations and permit conditions 

 

NMED Homepage

 Search AQB Quick Links...

New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau Home Page Page 1 of 2

file://H:\6PD\6PD-L\NM SIP-FIP Docket\Echo of NMED web site as of 12-21-10\aqb.htm 1/6/2011
The Air Quality Bureau has authority over air quality in all New Mexico counties except Bernalillo County and 

except facilities on Tribal Lands

Click on the categories on the yellow bar above to get menus listing the many areas of interest on our web site. 

Our address is 1301 Siler Road, Building B, Santa Fe, NM 87507. Our phone number is (505) 476-4300. 

 

Recovery Act Dollars Jump-Start Clean Diesel Projects

page last updated 12/15/2010 

© 2008 New Mexico Environment Department. All Rights Reserved. 

What's New - Click here for Invitations to Bid on Procurement of Air Monitoring Equipment updated 

12/15/10 

New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau Home Page Page 2 of 2

file://H:\6PD\6PD-L\NM SIP-FIP Docket\Echo of NMED web site as of 12-21-10\aqb.htm 1/6/2011
Table 20.  Homeownership Rates by Race and Ethnicity of Householder:  1994 to 2006


                                                             1994      1995   1996\1       1997      1998      1999      2000      2001      2002   2002\r


U.S. total.............................................     64.0      64.7      65.4      65.7      66.3      66.8      67.4      67.8      67.9      67.9

  White, total.........................................     67.7      68.7      69.1      69.3      70.0      70.5      71.1      71.6      71.8      71.7
    Non-Hispanic White.................................     70.0      70.9      71.7      72.0      72.6      73.2      73.8      74.3      74.5      74.7
  Black, total.........................................     42.3      42.7      44.1      44.8      45.6      46.3      47.2      47.7      47.3      47.4
  All Other Races, total...............................     47.7      47.2      51.0      52.5      53.0      53.7      53.5      54.2      54.7      54.5
      American Indian or Alaskan Native................     51.7      55.8      51.6      51.7      54.3      56.1      56.2      55.4      54.6      54.0
      Asian or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander........     51.3      50.8      50.8      52.8      52.6      53.1      52.8      53.9      54.7      54.6
      Other............................................     36.1      37.4        NA        NA        NA        NA        NA        NA        NA        NA

  Hispanic or Latino...................................     41.2      42.1      42.8      43.3      44.7      45.5      46.3      47.3      48.2      47.0
  Non-Hispanic.........................................     65.9      66.7      67.4      67.8      68.3      68.9      69.5      69.9      70.0      70.2



                                                             2003      2004      2005      2006


U.S. total.............................................     68.3      69.0      68.9      68.8

  White alone, total...................................     72.1      72.8      72.7      72.6
    Non-Hispanic White alone...........................     75.4      76.0      75.8      75.8
  Black alone, total...................................     48.1      49.1      48.2      47.9
  All Other Races alone, total\2.......................     56.0      58.6      59.2      59.9
      American Indian or Alaskan Native alone..........     54.3      55.6      58.2      58.2
      Asian or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander alone..     56.3      59.8      60.1      60.8

  Hispanic or Latino...................................     46.7      48.1      49.5      49.7
  Non-Hispanic.........................................     70.8      71.5      71.2      71.2




\1 Beginning in 1996 to 2002, those answering 'other' for race were allocated to one of the 4 race categories--
White, Black, American Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo (one category), or Asian or Native Hawaiian.
NA - Not Applicable.
\2 Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, Americn Indian or Alaska Native (only one race reported) and Two or more races.
Honorable Tom 1. Beeuchamp Secretary

of State Austin,

Texas Attention: Mr. ClaudeA. Williams Dear Sir: Opinion Ho. O-1140 Re: Statutes

applicable

to a foreign corporation

issuing no psr value stock and applyingfor s permit to &business inTexas. We acknowledge

receiptof your letterof July 19, in vhich you request the opinionof this depertment on the follovlng

three questions: '1. In the matter of a foreigncorporation with non par value shares of stock, must such corporation show that at least $25,COCof the non par valus'shares have been subscribed

and paid for which in no event shellbe less than ten per cent of the capital stock? “2. In case of a foreign corporation vith both per and non par shares,

would such corporation have to show that 

### 5U$ of its par value shareshas been subscribed.: and lO$ paid in, providing that such non par value shares shall be not less than $25,000paid in? 

### "3. Would Article 1530 of the Revised Civil Statutes control in all instances in the matter of foreign corporations,

that is, muat each foreigncorporation, regedless of its division of capital

stock into par and non par shares, be controlled

by this articleof the Statutes, re@rdleas of the limitations conferred by virtue of the non par value Act?” As you indicate

in your letter,,in an OpiniondatedAugust 2, 

### 196, addresse&

to Eon. D. A. Gregg,Acting Secretary of State,Assistant Attorney

GeneralGeorge

E. Christian

answered-tie identical questions

set out above;the first two in the negative andU.e third in the affirmative.Honorable Tom L. Beauchamp,

Psge 2 (O-1140)

The provisions

of Chapter lga, Title 32, RevisedCivil Statutes of 195, apply only to the organization of Bomeatic

corporations

and the e?aendment of &a&em of domestic corporations.

The articlescontained in Chapter 19, Title -52,

RevisedCivil Statute8 of 1925, set forth the conditions underwhich a foreigncorporation vill be permitted

to do businessin Texas. We enclose a copy of the Opinionof Assistant Attorney

General Christian,

with which we fully concur. Yours very truly ATIXRNFX-OF~ s/ Ross Carlton

BY Ross Carlton Assistant RC:in-law ENC. APPRO~'~ JULY 28, s/w. F. KmlE 1939 FIRST ASSISTART ATTORUEf GAPPFiovEB

OPmIOH col4lmYTE RI R. w. F.,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         120,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  281,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               404,685
<PP&E>                                          44,844
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,241)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 472,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          923,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       945,569
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,396,246)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   472,970
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,678
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  999,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,014,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (101,110)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (913,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (913,011)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Arlen F. Henock, the chief financial officer of Proliance International, Inc. (the ‘‘issuer’’), does hereby certify that the report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the ‘‘report’’) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Arlen F. Henock                                                           Arlen F. HenockExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(chief financial officer)Proliance International, Inc.August 14, 2007

----