alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SCIENCES,  INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED 
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTH  PERIOD  ENDED JUNE 30,  
1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS. </LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                          19,479,331
<SECURITIES>                     1,836,506
<RECEIVABLES>                    8,762,740
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                30,838,545
<PP&E>                           4,324,613
<DEPRECIATION>                   1,314,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  43,005,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,677,600
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                            55,031
<OTHER-SE>                      40,132,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    43,005,507
<SALES>                         21,653,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                21,653,175
<CGS>                           13,290,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   13,290,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   4,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  4,866,098
<INCOME-TAX>                     1,911,669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              2,954,429
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     2,954,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .31
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 151 (Monday, August 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 38324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16706]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Integrated Photonics Institute for 
Manufacturing Innovation Operating Under the Name of The American 
Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 23, 2018, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Integrated Photonics Institute 
for Manufacturing Innovation operating under the name of the American 
Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics (``AIM Photonics'') 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Applied 
Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; The Board of Governors of the 
Colorado State University System acting by and through Colorado State 
University, Fort Collins, CO; Stonehill College, Inc., Easton, MA; 
University of Chicago Argonne LLC, as operator of Argonne National 
Laboratory, Lemont, IL; The George Washington University, Washington, 
DC; Marktech International Corporation dba Marktech Optoelectronics, 
Latham, NY; and Israeli Hi-Tech Association at the Manufacturer's 
Association of Israel, TelAviv, ISRAEL, have been added as parties to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and AIM Photonics intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 16, 2016, AIM Photonics filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on July 25, 2016 (81 FR 48450).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 26, 
2018. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 12, 2018 (83 FR 10750).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-16706 Filed 8-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          59,010
<SECURITIES>                                    63,095
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,467
<PP&E>                                          38,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,104
<BONDS>                                        113,378
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,470
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,904
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,264
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,186
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,186
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.42)


</TABLE>
# C_2011361EN.01001401.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/14

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 December 2011

2011/C 361/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3384 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4349 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85315 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0185 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2332 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6770 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,475 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,08 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6981 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5149 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3428 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4700 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3179 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3674 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4118 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7357 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7356 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 533,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9853 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4820 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5000 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 105,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2140 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,318 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,2020 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,423 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4243 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3191 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,6970 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3384

JPY

Japanese yen

103,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4349

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85315

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0185

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2332

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6770

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,475

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,08

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6981

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5149

RON

Romanian leu

4,3428

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4700

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3179

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3674

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4118

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7357

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7356

KRW

South Korean won

1 533,70

ZAR

South African rand

10,9853

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4820

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5000

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 105,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2140

PHP

Philippine peso

58,318

RUB

Russian rouble

42,2020

THB

Thai baht

41,423

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4243

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3191

INR

Indian rupee

69,6970

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03157**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 03157\03157_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03157\03157_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03157\03157_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03157\03157_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03157\03157_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03157\03157_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03157\03157_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03157\03157_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03157\03157_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03157\03157_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03157\Certification Statement Plant ID 03157.pdf Plant certification statement x 03157\Plant Contact\03157_Steam Electric Follow-up for Lake Road Generating Station.doc Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 03157\Plant Contact\Lake Road (03157) Follow-Up Questions Responses.pdf Plant submitted survey file

03157\Supplemental Documentation\03157 Diagrams LR.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03157\Supplemental Documentation\Follow Up Questions_Draft.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up

03157\Supplemental Documentation\ICR.LR.CoverPAge.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03157\Supplemental Documentation\SteamElectricFollowUp_010411.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### M & L CABLE, INC., Petitioner, v. Jess YARBOROUGH, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 41474.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 23, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 3, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
December 31, 1997 consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements
of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the twelve-month period
ended 12/31/97 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                         13,169
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 167,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    6,374
<INVENTORY>                                                   205,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              405,595
<PP&E>                                                      3,189,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                                883,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              3,347,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         209,361
<BONDS>                                                       868,665
<COMMON>                                                       45,005
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  1,317,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                3,347,510
<SALES>                                                     1,679,311
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            1,679,311
<CGS>                                                       1,386,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               1,386,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             49,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               190,394
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   72,350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           118,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  118,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    2.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    2.62


</TABLE>
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 10
- 00424
- CR LARRY RANDALL STEELE , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 278th District Court Madison County, Texas Trial Court No. 11,379

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Larry Randall Steele was convic ted in a bench trial of the offense of possession of cocaine less than one gram. T EX
. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN
. § 481.115 (West 2010). He was sentenced to two years confinement in a state jail facility. The trial court assessed attorney’s fees in the ju dgment. In one issue, Steele challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s assessment of attorney’s fees. We modify the trial court’s judgment, and affirm it as modified.Steele v. State Page 2

For the purposes of assessing attorney's fees, once an a ccused is found to be indigent, he is presumed to remain so through the proceedings absent proof of a material change in his circumstances. T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN . art. 26.04(p) (West Supp. 2011); Mayer v. State , 309 S.W.3d 552, 557 (Tex. Crim. App. 20 10); Watkins v. State , 333 S.W.3d 771, 782 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2010, pet. ref’d). Accordingly if the defendant is found to be indigent at the outset of trial, there must be some evidence presented to the trial court of a change in financial circumstances befo re attorney's fees can be assessed against the defendant. See Mayer , 309 S.W.3d at 553. In this case, Steele was found to be indigent prior to trial and was appointed trial counsel. No evidence indicating a change in his financial circumstances was prof fered during the trial. Additionally, the trial court determined that Steele was indigent for purposes of appeal, ordered the appointment of appellate counsel, and granted Steele a free record on appeal on account of his indigence. The State agrees that there is no evidence to support the trial court’s assessment of attorney’s fees. Accordingly, as the presumption of indigence remains, we hold that the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court's assessment of attorney’s fees. See T EX
. C ODE C RI M
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 26.04(p) (West Supp. 2011); Mayer , 309 S.W.3d at 557; Watkins , 333 S.W.3d 771, 782.
Steele’s sole issue is sustained. Having found the evidence to be insufficient, we modify the trial court's judgment to delete the order to pay attor ney's fees and order Steele to pay only the costsSteele v. State Page 3

of court in the amount of $280.00. See Mayer , 309 S.W.3d at 557. The trial court’s judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Affirmed as modified Opinion delivered and filed December 7, 2011 Do not publish [CR25]
<PAGE>   1


              JILLIAN'S ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                         Percentage of Ownership            Percentage of Ownership
                                                         as of March 31, 1997               as of June 20, 1997
                                                         --------------------               -------------------


<S>                                                      <C>                                <C> 
Jillian's, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)                 100%                               100%

Jillian's Billiard Club of Kendall, Inc.                 100%                               100%
(a Delaware corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Club of Seattle, Inc.                 100%                               100%
(a Delaware corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Club of Cleveland, Inc.               100%                               100%
(a Delaware corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Club of Coconut Grove, Inc.           100%                               100%
(an inactive Delaware corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Club of Cleveland Heights, Inc.       100%                               100%
(a Delaware corporation)

Carom Financial Corporation                              100%                               100%
(an inactive Florida corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Club of Champaign-Urbana, Inc.        100%                               100%
(an Illinois corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Club of Worcester, Inc.               100%                               100%
(a Massachusetts corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Club of Annapolis, Inc.               100%                               100%
(a Maryland corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Cafe, Inc.                            100%                               100%
(a Washington corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Club of Long Beach, Inc.              100%                               100%
(a California corporation)

Jillian's Billiard Club of Tacoma, Inc.                  100%                               100%
(a Delaware corporation)

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50729

Summary Calendar

 

RICKY NEALS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ELTON D. BROCK, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-96-CV-006

- - - - - - - - - -

March 24, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The motion of Ricky Neals, Texas prisoner #639448, to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. Because Neals’

current balance in his prison account is $0.00, we assess no

initial partial filing fee against Neals. However, Neals

henceforth shall make monthly payments of twenty percent of the

preceding month’s income credited to his account. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b). The agency having custody of Neals is directed to

forward payments from his prisoner account to the clerk of the 
No. 96-50729

- 2 -

district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10

until the appellate filing fee of $105 is paid. Id.

Concerning Neals’ contentions that prison officials failed

to protect him from his cellmates and that the officials were

deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, we have

reviewed Neals’ brief and the record, and we find that the

district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Neals’

civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Neals’ appeal is without arguable merit and

is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Neals is cautioned that future frivolous

civil suits and appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite

the imposition of sanctions. Neals is further cautioned to

review any pending suits and appeals to ensure that they do not

raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED. 5th Cir. R.

42.2.
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States: 1965 to 2001



           First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

2001.....    67.5     67.7
2000.....    67.1     67.2     67.7     67.5

1999.....    66.7     66.6     67.0     66.9
1998.....    65.9     66.0     66.8     66.4
1997.....    65.4     65.7     66.0     65.7
1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2
1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4

\r Revised.