alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<------"

~s

flYMCW'

,,-,' v -:J "__ / 'J J

Mason City Municipal Airport

March 20, 2014

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer

Chief, Essential Air Service Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

LJI~:;.',R20 P J Sl

RE: Request/or Comments/or Essential Air Service Proposals Submitted February 21,2014

Docket Number: OST-2001-10684; Mason City

Docket Number: OST-2001-10682; Fort Dodge

Dear Mr. Schlemmer:

The Mason City Airport Commission met in special session yesterday afternoon and unanimously voted

to reject both of the RFP's submitted by Air Choice One and Great Lakes Aviation to the Department of

Transportation on February 21, 2014 and allow for another round of solicitation for proposals for Mason

City and Fort Dodge.

The reason for this request is to be able to explore all opportunities and avenues with air carriers on

proposals that will meet the needs of our communities.

In addition, we have the following concerns with the two proposals submitted:

• Great lakes Aviation, LTD, concerns with past experience regarding unreliability and

non-competitive fares.

• Multi-Aero Inc. d/b/a Air Choice One utilizing a single engine aircraft as opposed to a

twin engine aircraft and the affect that has on the duration of the flight.

Our communities have been able to support larger seat aircraft with more available annual seats. We are

extremely concerned with the language of 49 USC 41742 which could jeopardize our ability to receive

twin-engine aircraft if we have single-engine aircraft service for 60 consecutive days.

It is counterproductive to the long term development and success of air service to keep reducing the seat

capacities at our respective communities.

We will respectfully await the EAS Department of Transportation's decision regarding our request.

Sincerely,

Pamela Osgood,

Airport Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000106170
<NAME>WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  799,372
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                103,426
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      73,733
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   213,606
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,190,137
<COMMON>                                    26,812
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  150,911
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         97,045
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             274,768
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       21,000
<PREFERRED>                                 20,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       334,742
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          47,400
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               14,700
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                 29,269
<LEASES-CURRENT>                             2,965
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             445,293
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>            1,190,137
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  421,337
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         4,927
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 389,319
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 395,314
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     26,023
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           2,953
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              30,044
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    26,122
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,922
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  5,305
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               (1,383)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    16,494
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   24,094
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      68,512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
#### Johnnell Lee LOCKETT, Petitioner, v. Hon. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 73-967.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 6, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1990 

To prohibit aliens who are not lawfully present in the United States from 

being eligible for postsecondary education benefits that are not available 

to all citizens and nationals of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2014 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit aliens who are not lawfully present in the United 

States from being eligible for postsecondary education 

benefits that are not available to all citizens and nationals of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT 

4 FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS. 

5 Section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and 

6 Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1623) is 

7 amended to read as follows: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1990 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 505. INELIGIBILITY FOR ALIENS NOT LAWFULLY 

2 PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES TO RE3 CEIVE PREFERENTIAL POSTSECONDARY 

4 EDUCATION BENEFITS. 

5 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—An alien who is not lawfully 

6 present in the United States shall not be eligible for any 

7 postsecondary education benefit unless every citizen and 

8 national of the United States is eligible to receive such 

9 a benefit (in no less an amount, duration, and scope). 

10 ‘‘(b) ENFORCEMENT THROUGH CIVIL ACTION.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any citizen or national of 

12 the United States who is enrolled at a postsecondary 

13 educational institution in the United States that is 

14 alleged to have violated subsection (a) may petition 

15 the district court of the United States in which such 

16 institution is located to enforce the restriction de17 scribed in such subsection by commencing a civil ac18 tion, on his or her own behalf, in such court against 

19 any State official that oversees such institution. 

20 ‘‘(2) RELIEF.—If the plaintiff in a civil action 

21 commenced under paragraph (1) proves by a prepon22 derance of the evidence that the postsecondary edu23 cational institution in which the plaintiff was en24 rolled violated subsection (a), the court shall— 

25 ‘‘(A) provide all appropriate relief to the 

26 plaintiff, including damages equal to the moneVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:17 Feb 05, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1990.IS S1990

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1990 IS

1 tary value of any benefit provided to an alien 

2 who is not lawfully present in the United States 

3 that was denied to the plaintiff; and 

4 ‘‘(B) award attorneys’ fees and court costs 

5 to the plaintiff.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  First Quarter 2003 and 2002

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                    First     First    Standard
                                   quarter   quarter   error on  Standard     2003
Type                                 2003     2002r      2003    error on   Percent
                                   estimate  estimate  estimate difference  of total

All housing units.................  120,249   118,721       217        319       100

  Occupied........................  105,407   104,421       228        334        88
    Owner occupied................   71,645    70,811       227        333        60
    Renter occupied...............   33,762    33,610       182        266        28

  Vacant..........................   14,842    14,300       128        186        12
    Year-round vacant.............   11,319    10,755       113        164         9
      For rent....................    3,553     3,393        65         94         3
      For sale only...............    1,242     1,197        39         56         1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy..........      825       759        32         45         1
      Held off market.............    5,699     5,406        82        118         5
        For occasional use........    1,992     1,780        49         69         2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence elsewhere.    1,145     1,073        37         53         1
        For other reasons.........    2,562     2,553        55         81         2

    Seasonal vacant...............    3,523     3,545        65         95         3
rRevised
NOTE:  The Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancies and Homeownership (CPS/HVS) estimates are now controlled to independent
housing unit counts.  This should make the CPS/HVS counts of housing units more comparable to other Census Bureau
housing surveys.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00422- CV

Jeff rey T. Hanson, App ellant

v. NNN 1 & 2 Met

Cente r 1, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Me t Ce nter 2, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met

Cente r 3, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Me t Ce nter 4, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met

Cente r 5, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Me t Ce nter 7, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met

Cente r 10, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Me t Ce nter 11, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met

Cente r 12, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Me t Ce nter 13, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met

Cente r 17, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Me t Ce nter 18, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met

Cente r 19, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Me t Ce nter 20, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met

Cente r 21, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Me t Ce nter 22, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met

Cente r 23, LLC, Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 250 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 2-0 0259 5, H ONO RAB LE AMY CLARK MEACH UM, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O PI N I O N Appellee s filed a status repor t in this a bated appea l r equesting that we c ontinue the abate ment of this appea l for 30 day s pending continuing settlement neg otiations. Appellant does not oppose this reque st. We abate the appea l until June 4, 2014. All a ppellate deadlines will be tolled during the period of abate ment. The parties shall submit either a motion to reinstate or a joint status repor t conce rningthe status of settlement neg otiations no later than June 4, 2014._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Field Abated Filed: May

9, 2014

2
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CPI Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements No.
33-50082 and No. 002-86403, on Forms S-8 of CPI Corp. of our report dated April
4, 2002, except for paragraph 3 of Note 4, which is as of April 12, 2002 and
Note 2, which is as of May 7, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of CPI Corp. and subsidiaries as of February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001 and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended February 2, 2002 which report appears in the February 2, 2002
annual report on Form 10-K/A of CPI Corp. Our report refers to a change in the
Company's method of accounting for revenue recognition effective February 6,
2000, and to the restatement of the consolidated balance sheets as of February
2, 2002 and February 3, 2001, the related consolidated statements of operations
for the years ended February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and
cash flows for the years ended February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001.


/s/ KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
May 7, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 27,
1998 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1,000
       
<S>                               <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                                     642  
<SECURITIES>                                                 0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                           96,949  
<ALLOWANCES>                                             2,425  
<INVENTORY>                                            143,557  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       256,315  
<PP&E>                                                 195,582  
<DEPRECIATION>                                          78,595  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         591,178  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  206,462  
<BONDS>                                                134,166  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0  
<PREFERRED>                                                  0  
<COMMON>                                                   323  
<OTHER-SE>                                             206,585  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           591,178  
<SALES>                                                284,652  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       284,652  
<CGS>                                                  186,614  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          186,614  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        61,026  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      11,047  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         25,965  
<INCOME-TAX>                                            10,400  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     15,565  
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         (1,660)
<CHANGES>                                                    0  
<NET-INCOME>                                            13,905  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0.46  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.45  
                                                      


</TABLE>
#### Kenneth Herbert WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Rita Kay WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. 1601.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 8, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Thomas R. Waddell, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October

29, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00741-CV

ANNA ABATECOLA, ROBERT ABATECOLA, AND ABATECOLA 

LEASING, Appellants

V.

2 SAVAGES CONCRETE PUMPING, LLC, AND JOSEPH LOWRY, 

INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 212th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-CV-0186

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed September 23, 2019. On October 15, 

2019, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted. 
2

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
# C_2012017EN.01000901.xml

| 20.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 January 2012

2012/C 17/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2911 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4358 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83560 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7605 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2076 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6620 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,298 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 302,11 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7002 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3250 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3438 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3620 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2391 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3012 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0206 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6102 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6449 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 466,73 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2423 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1545 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5660 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 590,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0069 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,147 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5596 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,837 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2804 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1321 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,9170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2911

JPY

Japanese yen

99,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4358

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83560

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7605

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2076

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6620

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,298

HUF

Hungarian forint

302,11

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7002

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3250

RON

Romanian leu

4,3438

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3620

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2391

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3012

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0206

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6102

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6449

KRW

South Korean won

1 466,73

ZAR

South African rand

10,2423

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1545

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5660

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 590,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0069

PHP

Philippine peso

56,147

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5596

THB

Thai baht

40,837

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2804

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1321

INR

Indian rupee

64,9170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2011324EN.01001101.xml

| 9.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/11

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.6397 — G4S/ISS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 324/08

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 27 October 2011, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between G4S and ISS. On 2 November 2011, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.

---
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          38,428
<SECURITIES>                                    54,737
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,641
<PP&E>                                          25,207
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,747
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,744
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,531
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,519)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,519)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
#### Agnes PHILLIPS, Widow of Leroy POST v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 5452.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

April 17, 1973.

James O. Manning, Metairie, for plaintiff-appellant.

Stephen L. Huber, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before SAMUEL, BOUTALL and SCHOTT, JJ.

SCHOTT, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a dismissal of her claim for damages arising out of a fall she suffered at premises owned by defendant’s insureds, Mr. and Mrs. Wilson J. Le-Compte.

At about 8:00 A.M. on May 6, 1970, plaintiff was walking from her apartment toward her automobile, carrying several dresses over her left arm, a night case in her left hand and her automobile keys in her right hand, on her way to a baby sitting assignment.

Running parallel to the front of the house is a concrete walkway, 21 inches wide, leading from the entrance to plaintiff’s apartment on the left of the residence as one faces it to a gate entering the driveway on the right side of the house. Running perpendicular to this walk and the residence is another concrete walk leading from the sidewalk to the front steps of the main residence. At the place where the two walks intersect, there was along the walk running parallel to the main house and the one on which plaintiff was proceeding a step down of approximately four inches and then after traversing the walk from the street an incline of approximately two and a half inches. On plaintiff’s right side of the latter step-up a four and a half inch piece of the parallel walk was broken and missing from the edge of the walk and a piece of gardening slate extended into the walkway about two inches from that edge. It was at this point that plaintiff believes she caught her foot and lunged forward.

Mr. LeCompte testified that he had constructed these walks 19 years previous to the accident and all of the conditions described, and shown in various photographs introduced at the trial, are exactly as they were when the original construction took place. Plaintiff testified that she had been a tenant at the premises for 18 months and acknowledged that all of the conditions described have been the same throughout the entire period in which she had resided there.

*328In written reasons for judgment the trial judge pretermitted the question of any negligence on the part of the LeComptes and found that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence barring her recovery. He found that her negligence consisted in her failure to see the broken pavement and the corrugated slate in her pathway when she admitted that she was looking ahead as she walked, and in her failure to take precaution in view of these conditions which were present in an area she had passed by daily for 18 months, the existence of which she was well aware.

We are convinced that the trial judge correctly found that plaintiff was contribu-torily negligent and consequently the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### Forrest E. WATSON, Appellant, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, and Mildred H. Watson, Appellees.

No. 71-43.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.