alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32          Section 1350
Certifications.

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Beach First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
               with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/  Walter E. Standish, III
| |  | ----------------------------
| |  | Walter E. Standish, III     
| |  | Chief Executive Officer     
| |  | August 11, 2006             

| |  | /s/  Richard N. Burch  
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | Richard N. Burch       
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | August 11, 2006
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  First Quarter: 2007 and 2008

          (in percent)

                                    90-percent

                    First    First  confidence   90-percent confidence

Age of householder Quarter  Quarter interval     interval (&plusmn;)a

                    2007     2008   of 2008 rate of difference



United States.....    68.4     67.8      0.5           0.4



 Under 25 years...    25.2     23.6      1.5           1.4

 25 to 29 years...    40.7     39.7      1.4           1.4

 30 to 34 years...    54.0     54.8      1.4           1.4

 35 to 39 years...    65.7     64.7      1.3           1.3

 40 to 44 years...    70.8     68.6      1.3           1.2

 45 to 49 years...    74.5     73.8      1.1           1.2

 50 to 54 years...    77.2     76.3      1.1           1.2

 55 to 59 years...    79.8     80.1      0.8           0.8

 60 to 64 years...    81.3     80.8      0.9           0.9

 65 to 69 years...    82.8     81.1      1.4           1.2

 70 to 74 years...    82.8     82.3      1.5           1.3

 75 years and over..  79.0     78.2      1.1           1.0



   Under 35 years...  41.7     41.3      0.9           0.8

   35 to 44 years...  68.3     66.7      0.9           0.9

   45 to 54 years...  75.8     75.0      0.8           0.8

   55 to 64 years...  80.4     80.4      0.6           0.6

   65 years and over. 80.9     79.9      0.8           0.7

aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliablilty.  

The larger the confidence interval is, in relation to the size of the estimate, 

the less reliable the estimate.
EXHIBIT 31.3

# CERTIFICATION

I, Allen E. Larson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The Companys other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and Rule 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation.

c) disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors
and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors:

a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: | 1-14-04 |  | /s/   Allen E. Larson                  
|----- | ------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|      |         |  |                                        
|      |         |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer



---
# C_2011365EN.01000601.xml

| 15.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/6

---

Special Report No 13/2011 ‘Does the control of customs procedure 42 prevent and detect VAT evasion?’

2011/C 365/07

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 13/2011 ‘Does the control of customs procedure 42 prevent and detect VAT evasion?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Document

Exhibit No. 10(g)


Summary of the 
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Executive Long-Term Disability Plan


The Kimberly-Clark Corporation Executive Long-Term Disability Plan (the "Executive LTD Plan") is an insured disability plan funded by an individual disability income ("IDI") insurance policy issued to each plan participant.  The Executive LTD Plan provides participants with an enhanced level of long-term disability ("LTD") insurance coverage over that provided under the Kimberly-Clark Corporation Group Long-Term Disability Plan (the "LTD Plan"), effective as of January 1, 2023.


Eligibility
Participation is limited to officers that are elected by the Board of Directors of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and other employees on U.S. payroll with compensation above a specified threshold which causes them to receive less than the maximum income replacement percentage permitted under the LTD Plan.  Eligible employees are automatically enrolled in the Executive LTD Plan.


Executive LTD Plan Coverage
Generally, the LTD Plan provides a monthly disability benefit of 60% of base salary, which can be increased to 70% if optional LTD coverage is elected by an eligible plan participant, for a maximum monthly disability benefit of up to $20,000.  The Executive LTD Plan provides a monthly disability benefit of 70% of eligible compensation capped at $20,000 per month; however, this amount is reduced by the amount paid by the LTD Plan.  Therefore, the LTD Plan and the Executive LTD Plan together provide a combined maximum monthly disability benefit of 70% of eligible compensation up to a maximum of $40,000 per month.  Under the Executive LTD Plan, eligible compensation includes base salary and certain eligible bonuses 


Determination of Benefits
Benefits under the Executive LTD Plan will be determined pursuant to the terms of the IDI insurance policy issued by the insurance company and in accordance with the coverage rules described above. 


Insurance Policy
Coverage under the Executive LTD Plan is provided through an IDI insurance policy issued directly to the plan participant by the insurance company. Premiums for the IDI insurance policy are paid by Kimberly-Clark Corporation.
No. 11032.

#### The Home Building & Realty Co. et al. *v.*Blasberg et al.

Decided September 28, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Foster, Foster & 'Hartman,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. W. B. Neff*and *Mr. Joseph Moore,*for defendants in error.

Petition in error dismissed on authority of *Thatcher*v. *Watson et al.,*51 Ohio St., 561.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Sitauck and Price, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Citizens, Inc. We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements (No. 333-58698 and
333-118134) on Form S-3 of Citizens, Inc. of our reports dated March 30, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated statements of financial position of Citizens, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders
equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, and all related financial statement schedules, managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports
appear in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Citizens, Inc. Our report dated March 30, 2005, on managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004, expresses our opinion that the Company did not maintain effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 because of the effect of a material
weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory
paragraph that states that as of December 31, 2004, the Company had inadequate and ineffective
oversight and review of the Companys financial reporting process. /s/KPMG LLP Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2005 106
# C_2011361EN.01000601.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6409 — Gazprom Schweiz/Promgas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 361/02

On 2 December 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6409. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6409. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011379EN.01000102.xml

| 28.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6357 — Koninklijke Philips/Indal Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 379/02

On 23 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6357. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6357. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors of Bestfoods:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms
S-8 (No. 2-92248 and 33-49847) and on Form S-3 (No.333-64301) of Bestfoods of
our report dated February 10, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Bestfoods and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1998 which report
appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Bestfoods.



                                             /S/ KPMG LLP
                                                (KPMG LLP)


New York, New York
March 23, 1999



                                       17
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12



                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (Amounts in Millions, Except Ratios)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                                                             March 31,
                                                                                             ---------

                                                                                       2000             1999
                                                                                       ----             ----

<S>                                                                                  <C>              <C>
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes ...................          $ 124.8          $  6.4

Add (deduct) distributions greater (less) than
     income of unconsolidated affiliates ..................................              2.2            (0.1)

Fixed charges from below ..................................................             50.6            65.9

Capitalized interest included in fixed charges ............................               --            (0.1)
                                                                                     -------          ------

         Earnings available for fixed charges .............................          $ 177.6          $ 72.1
                                                                                     =======          ======


Fixed charges:
     Interest expense, including amortization of debt expense/discount ....          $  48.9          $ 64.3
     Portion of rentals representing an interest factor ...................              1.7             1.5
     Interest capitalized .................................................               --             0.1
                                                                                     -------          ------
         Total fixed charges ..............................................          $  50.6          $ 65.9
                                                                                     =======          ======


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................................              3.5             1.1
                                                                                     =======          ======
</TABLE>
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 22- 460 LT Case No. 2021

- CF

- 000085 -A

_____________________________ H IRAM A NTONIO B ONILLA , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________
On a ppeal from the Circuit Court f or Citrus County

. Richard A

. Ho ward , J udge

. Matthew J

. M etz,, P ublic D efender, a nd Glendon George Gordon, Jr. , A ssistant P ubl ic D e fender, D ayto na B each, f o r A ppe llant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G e neral, Tallahasse e , a nd Daniel P. Caldwell , A ssistant A ttorney G e ne ral, D aytona B e ach, for Appellee. October 31, 2023

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. E DWA RDS , C.J ., W ALLIS , and H ARRIS , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 509,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        493,868
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   509,787
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,540
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    604
<INCOME-TAX>                                       248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                356
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       356
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.51

AMENDMENTmade this 1st day of November, 2007 to the[Option Agreement
Name]("Option Agreement") dated[2004 Grant Date]between Countrywide Financial Corporation
(the "Company") and you (the "Optionee").

W  I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H:

WHEREAS,the Optionee and the Company have previously entered into the Option Agreement; and

WHEREAS,the Optionee and the Company desire to extend the exercise term of the Option Agreement as described below.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Optionee and the Company agree to amend the Option Agreement, effective November 1, 2007, as follows:

1.     The
last sentence of Section 1 of the Option Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

"The
Option shall expire at 5:00 p.m., central time, on theseventh anniversaryof the Grant Date (the "Expiration Date").

2.     As
amended by this Amendment, the Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, by signing below, the Optionee acknowledges acceptance of the terms and conditions of the Amendment and understanding
of the potential tax implications.

| |  | [Employee Name]:
| |  | ----------------
| |  |                 
| |  | Date:           
| |  | Employee ID:    

---



QuickLinks
### Negotiated Rulemaking for Distribution Transformers Medium- and Low

- Voltage Working Group Meeting Schedule



## October 12-14, 2011

Working Group Date and Time Address

Medium

- Voltage October 12; 9:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m. October 13; 9:00 a.m. – 12:00p.m. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 4301 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22203

Low- Voltage October 13; 1:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. October 14; 9:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 4301 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22203



## November 8-9, 2011

Working Group Date and Time Address

Medium

- Voltage November 8; 9:00 a.m. – 6:00p.m. Edison Electric Institute 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004

- 2696

Low- Voltage November 9; 9:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. 950 L’Enfant Plaza Washington, DC 20024 Room: ?



## November 30 – December 2, 2011

Working Group Date and Time Address

Medium

- Voltage November 30; 9:00 a.m. – 5:00p.m. December 1; 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. American Public Power Association 1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20009

- 5715

Low- Voltage December 1; 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. American Public Power Association 1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20009

- 5715

Low- Voltage December 2; 9:00 a.m. – 3:30 DOE, Forrestall Building 1000 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20585 Room: 8E

- 089