alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



MANGOSOFT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of MangoSoft, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2003 (the Periodic Report), I, Dale Vincent, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  |  |  | MANGOSOFT, INC.
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | By:            
|                       |  |  |  |
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1890 

To ensure that decisions by the Secretary of Education to award grants 

or other assistance to States or local educational agencies are not contingent upon the adoption of specific educational curricula. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2013 

Mr. COCHRAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To ensure that decisions by the Secretary of Education to 

award grants or other assistance to States or local educational agencies are not contingent upon the adoption 

of specific educational curricula. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Education 

5 Access and Autonomy Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1890 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING THE ADOPTION OF 

2 SPECIFIC CURRICULA. 

3 (a) DEFINITION OF EDUCATION GRANT OR ASSIST4 ANCE.—In this section, the term ‘‘education grant or as5 sistance’’— 

6 (1) means any grant, contract, cooperative 

7 agreement, or other assistance provided through a 

8 program administered by the Secretary of Edu9 cation; and 

10 (2) includes any waiver of a statutory or regu11 latory requirement of the Elementary and Secondary 

12 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) 

13 granted by the Secretary of Education under the au14 thority provided under section 9401 of such Act (20 

15 U.S.C. 7861). 

16 (b) NO REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIFIC CURRICULA.— 

17 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary 

18 of Education shall not require, as a condition of any edu19 cation grant or assistance, that a State or local edu20 cational agency adopt a specific elementary school or sec21 ondary school curriculum. 

22 (c) NO PRIORITY FOR SPECIFIC CURRICULA.—Not23 withstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 

24 Education shall select recipients for any education grant 

25 or assistance without providing any priority, preference, 

26 or special consideration to a State or local educational 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1890 IS

1 agency based on the adoption by the State or local edu2 cational agency of a specific elementary school or sec3 ondary school curriculum. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CheckFree Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David E. Mangum, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                            /s/ David E. Mangum
                       --------------------------------------------------------
                       David E. Mangum, Executive Vice President and Chief
                       Financial Officer of CheckFree Corporation
                       May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CheckFree Corporation and will be retained by CheckFree Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          73,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,496
<INVENTORY>                                     11,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,666
<PP&E>                                         325,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 437,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,329
<BONDS>                                        230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   437,189
<SALES>                                         89,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,541
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,091
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (451)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,873)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
#### Stephanie ASHE, wife of Ronald J. RAKOSKY v. Ronald J. RAKOSKY.

No. 53534.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: Ronald J. Rakosky applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 275 So.2d 421.

Writ denied. On facts found by Court of Appeal, no error of law.
No. 11166.

#### Brannon et al. *v.*The Board of County Commissioners of Columbiana County et al.

Decided October 19, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana county.

*Mr. W. F. Lones,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. J. H. Brooks; Mr. C. S. Speaker*and *Mr. M. J. McGarry,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
July 3, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51286 Summary Calendar

RENEE SHEREE O’CAROLAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TATE PURYEAR; TODD RIFFE; ROLAND CUNNINGHAM; JOHN DOES 1-10; WILLIAM DON MANTAGUE, Individually,

and as Hays County Sheriff,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-02-CV-41-SS

-------------------- Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Renee Sheree O’Carolan (O’Carolan) appeals the district

court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants on her civil

rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Texas state

court. She argues that her petition was timely filed and served

under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which she contends

should be applied in this case.No. 02-51286 -2-
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “apply to civil actions

removed to the United States district courts from the state courts

and govern procedure after remo val

. ” F E D

. R. C IV

. P. 81(c)

(emphasis added); see also Matter of Meyerland , 960 F.2d 512, 520

(5th Cir. 1992) (en banc) (“A case removed from state court simply

comes into the federal system in the same condition in which it

l eft the state system.”). Accordingly, because O’Carolan’s case

originated in state court, and the events relevant to its

timeliness occurred prior to its removal, the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure do not govern the issue whether O’Carolan tolled

the applicable statute of limitations while her case was pending in

Texas state court. S ee F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 81(c); Meyerland
, 960 F.2d

at 520. Because O’Carolan’s claim is time barred in state court,

Hainsler v. Mainka
, 807 S.W.2d 3, 5 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi

1991), it is also time barred here.

AFFIRMED.
#### Robert Rocco CONSANTINO v. STATE of Florida.

No. 38929.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 13, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
In corporation of Dockets by Reference June 22, 2012 Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2002 - 0051, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry, and Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2007 - 0877, Standards of Performance (NSPS) for Portland Cement Plants, are incorporated by reference into this docket (Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2011 - 0817.
No. 11050.

#### Zinn *v.*Martin.

Decided December 21, 1909.

Error to .Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Mr. Aaron A. Ferris,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Jno. M. Thomas, Jr.,*tor defendant m error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
----

**Exhibit        32.2**

**SECTION        906 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)    | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,                  2006 fully                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the                  Securities                  Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | the                  information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                  of The                  Amacore Group, Inc.           |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |

|   | /s/                  *James                  L. Koenig         *James                  L. KoenigActing                  Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Notice of Death Page 1 

No. 04-14-00751-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

JOSEFINA ALEXANDER GONZALEZ, ET AL,

 Appellants

v. 

RAYMOND S. DE LEON II, ET AL,

 Appellee

NOTICE OF DEATH

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellants inform the Court of the death of Josefina Alexander 

Gonzalez on December 9, 2014.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Robinson C. Ramsey______

 ROBINSON C. RAMSEY

 State Bar No. 16523700

 Email: rramsey@langleybanack.com

JOYCE W. MOORE

 State Bar No. 14357400

jwmoore@langleybanack.com 

PAULA C. BOSTON

 State Bar No. 24089661

pboston@langleybanack.com

 LANGLEY & BANACK, INC.

Trinity Plaza II

 745 E. Mulberry, Suite 900 

 San Antonio, Texas 78212

 Telephone: 210.736.6600

 Telecopier: 210.735.6889

ACCEPTED

04-14-00751-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

1/8/2015 2:30:14 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 01/8/2015 2:30:14 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Notice of Death Page 2

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on this 8th day of January, 2015, to the following 

counsel of record:

James Maverick McNeel

Laura C. Mason

STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP

2301 Broadway

San Antonio, Texas 78215

Attorneys for Raymond S. De 

Leon II, Trustee of the Family 

Trust

Jeffrey T. Knebel

Michael B. Knisely

OSBORNE, HELMAN, KNEBEL &

DELEERY, LLP

301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1910

Austin, Texas 78701

Attorneys for Rocio G. Guerra

/s/Robinson C. Ramsey______

ROBINSON C. RAMSEY

L & B 16052/0003/L0933914.DOCX
260 La. 127

#### HOLMES BRICK & SALVAGE COMPANY, Inc. v. REO CONSTRUCTION, INC.

No. 51954.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1971.

In re: Reo Construction, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 253 So.2d 562.

Writ refused. Since the case has been remanded, the judgment is not final.
#### Thomas Charles PIERRO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 24, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 12, 1973

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Corning Natural Gas Corporation Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act-filed as part of the 10-K for Year Ended September 30, 2005.

Presented on signature page of 10-K

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Corning Natural Gas Corporation (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Dated: January 13, 2006
# C_2012122EN.01000101.xml

| 27.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 April 2012

2012/C 122/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3215 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8760 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2016 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5765 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,758 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 287,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6997 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1820 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3775 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3359 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2736 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2968 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2543 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6196 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6409 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 501,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2582 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3069 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 140,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0359 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,192 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,7420 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,808 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4873 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3843 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,4510 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3215

JPY

Japanese yen

106,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81640

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8760

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2016

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5765

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,758

HUF

Hungarian forint

287,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6997

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1820

RON

Romanian leu

4,3775

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3359

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2736

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2968

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2543

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6196

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6409

KRW

South Korean won

1 501,14

ZAR

South African rand

10,2582

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3069

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 140,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0359

PHP

Philippine peso

56,192

RUB

Russian rouble

38,7420

THB

Thai baht

40,808

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4873

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3843

INR

Indian rupee

69,4510

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**EXHIBIT 23(b)****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Citizens, Inc.:We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos.333-77698, 333-58698, 333-118134, 333-139473, and 333-143518) and in the related Prospectuses ofCitizens, Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedules of Citizens, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Citizens, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLPAustin, Texas
EXHIBIT 32.1



906 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended February 28, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   November 27, 2006
        /s/   David H. RochePresident andChief Executive Officer/s/   Steven M. CaspersExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer


---
#### STATE of FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Oneal Henry PEARSON, Respondent.

No. 70-486.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Paris Diane Brown, Appellant

No. 06-13-00080-CV v.

Kathy Keith, Appellee

Appeal from the 429th District Court of 

Collin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 429-

02071-2011). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Paris Diane Brown, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 1, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135520 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. _________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

IN RE TAYLOR WHITE, Minor. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 135520 

 COA: 275043

 Oakland CC

ROBIN RENEE KESSLER, a/k/a 

ROBIN RENEE SALDANA,

Respondent-Appellant. 

 Family Division: 06-716244-NA 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0108 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 11, 2008 

Clerk
260 La. 404

#### Percy BURFICT, etc. v. Fred TROSCLAIR et al.

No. 52037.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1972.

In re: Percy Burfict, individually and as the Administrator of the estate of his minor daughter, Bernadette, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. John the Baptist. 254 So.2d 640.

Application denied: On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                          859,541
<SECURITIES>                    000
<RECEIVABLES>                   90,685
<ALLOWANCES>                    000
<INVENTORY>                     000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                000
<PP&E>                          20,027,287
<DEPRECIATION>                  (7,380,618)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  15,417,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           000
<BONDS>                         2,780,986
<COMMON>                        000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           000
<PREFERRED>                     000
<OTHER-SE>                      8,350,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    15,417,054
<SALES>                         2,574,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,629,593
<CGS>                           000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,214,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,219,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		430,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (234,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                    000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (234,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                  000
<EXTRAORDINARY>			000
<CHANGES>                       000
<NET-INCOME>                    (234,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (4.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (4.12)
        

</TABLE>