alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012092EN.01000101.xml

| 29.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 March 2012

2012/C 92/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3337 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83900 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8800 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2063 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6110 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,603 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,66 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7005 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1568 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3733 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3763 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2824 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3289 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3536 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6304 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6761 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 514,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2030 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3967 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5060 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 232,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0834 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,280 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,9312 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,038 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4262 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9715 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,7250 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3337

JPY

Japanese yen

110,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83900

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8800

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2063

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6110

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,603

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,66

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7005

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1568

RON

Romanian leu

4,3733

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3763

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2824

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3289

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3536

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6304

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6761

KRW

South Korean won

1 514,05

ZAR

South African rand

10,2030

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3967

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5060

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 232,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0834

PHP

Philippine peso

57,280

RUB

Russian rouble

38,9312

THB

Thai baht

41,038

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4262

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9715

INR

Indian rupee

67,7250

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Santiago RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. Victor TUETA, Otto Rohrer, and Marine Bank & Trust Company, Appellees.

No. 7115.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Feb. 3, 1967.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1967.

Norman S. Brown, of Brown & Brown, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert T. Mann, Tampa, for appellee Victor Tueta.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has filed an interlocutory appeal from two orders entered by the lower court. The first order, filed February 3, 1966, taxed the attorney fees of Appellee Victor Tueta against appellant. Unfortunately for the appellant, the notice of appeal as to this order was not filed within the 60-day period prescribed by Rule 4.2(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. Therefore, this court does not have jurisdiction and cannot consider the appeal on this order.

The second order, filed February 28, 1966, taxed the attorney fees of Appellee Marine Bank & Trust Company against appellant. The notice of appeal as to this order was filed timely so this court has jurisdiction of the appeal on this order. The appellant has not alleged any error with respect to this order and, after an examination of the record, no error can be found. Therefore, the order of the lower court, filed February 28, 1966, concerning attorney fees for Marine Bank & Trust Company is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and LILES and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
# C_2012096EN.01000301.xml

| 31.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6531 — Toshiba/HDD Assets of Western Digital)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 96/04

On 26 March 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6531. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6531. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
LYDIA ANN R U SH , Appellant ,

v.
STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

____________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CA SE NO. 1D 15

- 4631 and 1D15

- 4791 ( Consolidated )

Opinion filed August 12, 2016. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. William F. Stone, Judge. Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Ap pellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Appellant Lydia Ann Rush appeals from the trial court’s order revoking her probation and imposing a prison sentence f ollowing the court’s finding that she willfully and substantially violated a condition of her probation. Appellant argues that the evidence does not support a finding that her violation was willful, and the record2 supports her argument. Furthermore, the State concedes error. See State v. Carter , 835 So. 2d 259, 261 (Fla. 2002) (“Trial courts must consider each violation on a case

- by

case basis for a determination of whether, under the facts and circumstances, a particular violation is willful and substan tial and is supported by the greater weight of the evidence.”); Van Wagner v. State , 677 So. 2d 314, 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (“Where a probationer makes reasonable efforts to comply with a condition of probation, violation of the condition cannot be deemed ‘willful.’”). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for Appellant’s probation to be reinstated. B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
30, No ctor wih] Chirp Boi SiN
1
0, a

ba | 4 eine

mr
os of Jame, Ab A
|! x — 2

+ ege f
ie Kisuae. diay | |
plies UE

Historie census records are maintained and r

Visit http://www.orchives.gov fo

2a

;eleased by the National Archives and Records A‘

\dministra

‘more information about publicly available records like th

a i

tion, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

1e one shown here.

it

t
iz
i
i
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Cray Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certify, to such officers' knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 8, 2006

                               /s/ PETER J. UNGARO
                               -----------------------------------------------
                                   Peter J. Ungaro
                                   Chief Executive Officer and President

                               /s/ BRIAN C. HENRY
                               -----------------------------------------------
                                   Brian C. Henry
                                   Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020

Percent

Annual Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates for the United States: 1968-2022

Rental Vacancy Rate

Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Recession

Figure 1

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey, March 15, 2023

Recession data: National Bureau of Economic Research, <www.nber.org>

2022
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

|                                                 |                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                August 20,                2007 |                                                      |
|                                                 | */s/                Clark A. Marcus*                      |
|                                                 | Clark                A. Marcus                            |
|                                                 | Chief                Executive Officer                    |
|                                                 |                                                      |
| Dated:                August 20,                2007 |                                                      |
|                                                 | /s/                *Michelle                I. Greenberg* |
|                                                 | Michelle                I. Greenberg                      |
|                                                 | Acting                Controller Pro Tem                  |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

               AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


August 14, 1998

Union Pacific Resources Group Inc.
801 Cherry Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102

We are aware that Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. has incorporated by
reference in its Registration Statements No. 333-22655 and No. 333-52605 on Form
S-3 and No. 333-22613 and No. 333-35641 on Form S-8 its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1998, which includes our report dated July 27, 1998
covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant
to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report
prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Act.

Very truly yours,



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Fort Worth, Texas
Exhibit 10.18 

LETTER OF AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OFKIM S. BRACE

 

June 8, 2001

 

Kim S. BraceExecutive Vice President andChief Administrative OfficerPacific Northwest Bank

 

RE:       EmploymentContract

 

Dear Kim:

 

This is to certify that on May 7, 2001the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, Pacific Northwest Bankapproved an additional two year extension of your Employment Contract to June15, 2003.

 

The “window” for lump sum payment remainsexecutable at your option throughout this period, and all other terms andconditions remain in effect.  CorporateCounsel is drafting the formal extension but you may consider it to be in fullforce and effect.  The formal agreement,when completed, will supercede this letter.

 

The board and I greatly appreciate yourwillingness to continue on this great adventure.

 

Sincerely,

 
| /s/ PATRICK M. FAHEY |
|----------------------|
|                      |
| Patrick M. Fahey     |
| President & CEO  |

 

PMF/cm

 

Bcc:      GlenGarrison, Keller-Rohrback             Eric Jensen, Finance             Chandler Dalbey, HumanResources
Dear Mr. Gallaway:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3697). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/26/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/S/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
Exhibit 23   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-141425 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-63144, 333-121364 and 333-142724 on Forms S-8 of our report dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the related consolidated financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Northeast Utilities as of December 31, 2008 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as of January 1, 2008) appearing in the Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northeast Utilities for the year ended December 31, 2008.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-141425 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the related consolidated financial statement schedules of The Connecticut Light and Power Company as of December 31, 2008 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as of January 1, 2008) appearing in the Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northeast Utilities for the year ended December 31, 2008.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-141425 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the related consolidated financial statement schedules of Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Western Massachusetts Electric Company appearing in the Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northeast Utilities for the year ended December 31, 2008.   /s/Deloitte & Touche LLPDeloitte & Touche LLP   Hartford, Connecticut
February 27, 2009
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.55 **Contact:**  Malkia McLeod
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, MARCH 31, 2010 Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to Chicago to Celebrate National Census Day Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why “I count!” and view messages from other road tour participants.
    
  
 For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
No. 00-7179.

#### Anderson *v.*Williams, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Millard R. HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-193.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Leonard H. FELTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, County of Dade, Respondent.

No. 67-426.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 19, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MELODY L. COCHRAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

TRUST COMPANY, N.A.; WESTERN

PROGRESSIVE, LLC; OCWEN LOAN

SERVICING, LLC, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-56203

D.C. No. 

2:15-cv-03209-GHK-JC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. King, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 7, 2017

Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Melody Cochran appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her complaint, alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices

Act (“FDCPA”) and dependent state law claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

FILED

FEB 28 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Schlegel v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 720 F.3d

1204, 1207 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm. 

The FDCPA only imposes liability when an entity is attempting to collect a

debt. 15 U.S.C. § 1692(e). In her complaint, Cochran complains of DefendantsAppellees’ conduct related to the initiation of a nonjudicial foreclosure sale of her

property, i.e., sending three pre-foreclosure notices. Such activity, which is

required under California nonjudicial foreclosure laws, is not debt collection

activity as defined by the FDCPA. Ho v. ReconTrust, 840 F.3d 618, 621 (9th Cir.

2016) (“[A]ctions taken to facilitate a non-judicial foreclosure, such as sending the

notice of default and notice of sale, are not attempts to collect a ‘debt’ as that term

is defined by the FDCPA.”). Therefore, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of

the FDCPA claim and the dependent state law claims. 

AFFIRMED. The issuance of the mandate in this case is STAYED

pending the issuance of the mandate in Ho v. ReconTrust, No. 10-56884. The

requests for judicial notice are GRANTED. 

2
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 7, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1190

Lower Tribunal No. F15-22330B

________________

Ricky Canot,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge.

Ricky Canot, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.