alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1699 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1699

   To permit individuals to renew certain health insurance coverage 
 offered in the individual or small group markets and to provide that 
    such individuals would not be subject to the individual mandate 
                                penalty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 2013

  Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit individuals to renew certain health insurance coverage 
 offered in the individual or small group markets and to provide that 
    such individuals would not be subject to the individual mandate 
                                penalty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continuous Coverage Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING INDIVIDUALS WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO RENEW THEIR 
              HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE.

    Notwithstanding any provision of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) or the Health Care and 
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152), and the 
amendments made by such Acts--
            (1) a health insurance insurer shall offer an individual 
        the opportunity to renew enrollment in health insurance 
        coverage offered in the individual market if such individual 
        was enrolled in such coverage on September 30, 2013, and such 
        individual continues to meet the requirements of eligibility 
        for such coverage (such as timely payment of premiums);
            (2) an individual may renew enrollment in health insurance 
        coverage described in paragraph (1) for plan years through 
        December 31, 2015;
            (3) health insurance coverage described in paragraph (1) 
        shall not be required to meet the requirements of 1302 of the 
        Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022); 
        and
            (4) health insurance coverage described in paragraph (1) 
        shall be deemed to be minimum essential coverage for purposes 
        of section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986l.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11197.

#### Kling et al., Partners, *v.*Jamison et al., Partners.

Decided February 1, 1910.

*557Error to Circuit Court of Darke county.

*Messrs. Robeson & Yount*and *Messrs, Fitzgerald & Sprigg,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Marts & Hughes*and *Mr. George W. Mannix, Jr.,*for defendants in error.

Judgment reversed and cause-remanded for new trial. Grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed for .error in not reversing the judgment of the court of common pleas for error in overruling the motion for a new trial on the ground that that court erred in receiving the verdict and discharging the jury without recluir ing the jury to answer the tenth interrogatory. And this court proceeding to render the judgment that said circuit court should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of common pleas be, and the same is hereby, reversed for error in overruling the motion for a new trial on the ground that that court erred in receiving the verdict and discharging the jury without requiring the jury to answer interrogatory number ten, and this cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for a new trial.

Summers, C. J., Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Second Quarter 1997





                                    Rental vacancy rates





                             Second       Second      Standard     Standard

Area                        quarter      quarter      error on     error on

                               1997         1996     1997 rate   difference





United States..........         7.9          7.8          0.2          0.3



  Inside MAs...........         7.8          7.5          0.2          0.3

    In central cities..         8.2          7.8          0.3          0.4

    Not in central cities

    (suburbs)..........         7.3          7.2          0.3          0.4

  Outside MAs..........         8.7          8.8          0.5          0.7



 Northeast.............         6.7          7.6          0.4          0.6

 Midwest...............         8.2          7.2          0.4          0.6

 South.................         9.3          8.6          0.3          0.5

 West..................         6.8          7.2          0.3          0.5





                                    Homeowner vacancy rates



                             Second       Second      Standard     Standard

Area                        quarter      quarter      error on     error on

                              1997         1996      1997 rate   difference





United States..........         1.6          1.5          0.1          0.1



  Inside MAs...........         1.6          1.4          0.1          0.1

    In central cities..         1.9          1.7          0.1          0.2

    Not in central cities

    (suburbs)..........         1.5          1.2          0.1          0.1

  Outside MAs..........         1.7          1.9          0.1          0.2



 Northeast.............         1.6          1.4          0.1          0.2

 Midwest...............         1.1          1.1          0.1          0.1

 South.................         1.9          1.9          0.1          0.1

 West..................         1.9          1.3          0.1          0.2



    

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15616 and #15617; IOWA Disaster Number IA-00078]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Iowa dated 07/30/2018. *Incident:*
                         Tornado. *Incident Period:*
                         07/19/2018.
 DATES: Issued on 07/30/2018. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/28/2018. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/30/2019.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Marshall *Contiguous Counties:* Iowa: Grundy, Hardin, Jasper, Poweshiek, Story, Tama The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.938Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
7.220Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.610Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.610Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15616 C and for economic injury is 15617 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Iowa. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: July 30, 2018. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-17022 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go
to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 23 -BG-0 480

I N RE RICHARD L. SLOANE
DDN : 2023 -D 046
A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

B ar Reg istration No. 489140

B EFORE: McLeese and Deahl , Associate Judges, and Washington , Senior Judge.

O R D E R (FILED
— February 1, 2024)

On c onsideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s consent motion requesting the court lift the August 16, 2023, stay ; and on further consideration of the certified order from the state of Maryland indefinitely suspending respondent with the right to petition for reinstatement after six months; th is court’s June 16, 2023, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing him to show

cause why the functional ly equivalent discipline of a six month suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed as reciprocal discipline ; respondent’s response thereto wherein he requests a suspension of no t more than six month s without fitness; respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed on June 30, 2023; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel

, it is

OR DERED that the consent motion to lift the stay is granted and this case shall proceed. It is

F URTHER ORDERED that Richard L. Sloane is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for six months nunc pro tunc to June 30

, 2023 , with reinstatement conditioned on a showing of fitness

. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483, 487

- 88 ( D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to this presumption shoul d
b e rare) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (explaining that a rebuttable presumption in favor of identical reciprocal discipline applies unless one of theNo. 2 3

- BG

- 0 4 80

exceptions is established). Although respondent contends that a lesser sanction should be imposed, these arguments merely attempt to relitigate the discipline imposed by the state of Maryland, which is not permitted in reciprocal discipline

cases. See In re Chaganti , 144 A.3d 20, 24 (D.C. 2016) (“[O]ur responsibility in reciprocal discipline matters is not to sit in appellate review of the foreign disciplinary proceedings, in order to determine whether they conformed in every respect to local procedural and substantive law.”); In re Zdravkovich , 831 A.2d 964, 969 (D.C. 2003) (holding that, in a reciprocal matter, respondent “is not entitled to relitigate or coll aterally attack the findings or judgment of the [original disciplining court] ” and the infirmity of proof exception “is not an invitation to the attorney to relitigate in the District of Columbia the adverse findings of another court in a procedurally fair setting”) (citations omitted).

PER CURIAM
EX-4.18


   

  EXHIBIT 4.18

  COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE

   

  1 July 2022

  Liz Doolin

  50 Devereux Road

  HAZELWOOD PARK  SA  5066

  Dear Liz

  After completing several reviews at the end of the financial year, including your salary, I am pleased to advise that your Total Remuneration Package will increase, effective from 1 July 2022 from $230,000.00 per annum to $243,000.00 per annum. Out of this package, superannuation payments will be made by Bionomics to cover its obligations under the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992.

  The Nomination & Remuneration Committee has also recognised your commitment over the last year and I am pleased to advise that a bonus of $34,500 will be paid to you. The bonus amount will appear in your July pay and will be taxed accordingly.

  Further to this, the Board has also approved the issue of 2,000,000 bonus options to you in recognition of the company's achievements, and your personal goals in the 2021/2022 financial year. The offer letter for the options will be forwarded to you separately.

  Thank you for your loyalty, support and continued contribution to Bionomics. 

  Yours sincerely

  /s/ Adrian Hinton

  Adrian Hinton

  Acting Chief Financial Officer

  Bionomics Limited ABN 53 075 582 74031 
Dalgleish Street Thebarton SA Australia 5031 Phone 61 8 8354 6100 Fax 61 8 8354 6199 Email info@bionomics.com.au
website www.bionomics.com.au

   

  Exh. 4.18-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPUTER
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES,  INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF  OPERATIONS  AS OF AND FOR THE  SIX  MONTHS  ENDED  JUNE 30,  1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                     8,521,560
<SECURITIES>                                               5,500,085
<RECEIVABLES>                                             11,230,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          30,282,284
<PP&E>                                                    15,257,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                             2,559,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            54,435,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      4,041,275
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                     134,857
<OTHER-SE>                                                49,950,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              54,435,762
<SALES>                                                   33,773,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          33,773,666
<CGS>                                                     20,733,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             20,733,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            10,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            6,792,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                               2,620,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        4,172,706
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               4,172,706
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.28
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1820 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1820

    To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the costs of official 
  portraits of Members of Congress, heads of executive agencies, and 
        heads of agencies and offices of the legislative branch.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 12 (legislative day, December 11), 2013

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Mr. Coburn, and Mrs. Fischer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the costs of official 
  portraits of Members of Congress, heads of executive agencies, and 
        heads of agencies and offices of the legislative branch.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsible Use of Taxpayer Dollars 
for Portraits Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR OFFICIAL PORTRAITS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``executive agency'' has the meaning given the 
        term in section 133 of title 41, United States Code;
            (2) the term ``Member of Congress'' includes a Delegate or 
        Resident Commissioner to Congress; and
            (3) the term ``portrait'' means a painting.
    (b) Prohibition.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), no 
        Federal funds may be used to pay for the production of a 
        portrait of--
                    (A) a Member of Congress;
                    (B) the head of an executive agency; or
                    (C) the head of an agency or office of the 
                legislative branch.
            (2) Individuals in line of succession to presidency.--Not 
        more than $20,000 in Federal funds may be used to pay for the 
        production of a portrait of an individual who is in the line of 
        succession to the Presidency under subsection (a), (b), or (d) 
        of section 19 of title 3, United States Code.
    (c) Rules of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
to prohibit--
            (1) the use of Federal funds to publicly display a portrait 
        of an individual described in subsection (b)(1); or
            (2) the use of funds other than Federal funds to produce a 
        portrait of an individual described in subsection (b)(1), 
        including, in the case of a portrait of an individual described 
        in subsection (b)(2), the use of funds other than Federal funds 
        to pay the entire cost of producing the portrait or the portion 
        of the cost that exceeds $20,000, if any.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012202EN.01000301.xml

| 10.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6506 — Groupe Auchan/Magyar Hipermarket)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 202/02

On 18 April 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6506. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6506. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### T. H. DAVIDGE et al. v. Philip MAGLIOLO.

No. 61509.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: T. H. Davidge, et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Tangipahoa. 353 So.2d 289.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
Exhibit 21 - List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant



   The following is a list of subsidiaries meeting the requirements of Exhibit
21.

   a)  The Grant County Bank  (incorporated in West Virginia),  doing business
       as The Grant County Bank.

   b)  Capon Valley Bank  (incorporated  in West Virginia),  doing business as
       the Capon Valley Bank.

   c)  HBI  Life  Insurance  Company,  Inc.  (incorporated  in  the  state  of
       Arizona), doing business as HBI Life.

   d)  Highlands  Bankshares Trust Company  (incorporated in the state of West
       Virginia), doing business as Highlands Bankshares Trust Company

                                                                   Exhibit 21
#### Ramond BEATENCOURT et al. v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39268.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

I,Clark A. Marcus,  Chief Executive Officer of Eye Care International, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") which this statementaccompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |  the information containedin this Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofEye Care International, Inc..                                                         |

Dated: September 22, 2003

|  | /s/ Clark A. Marcus        Clark A. MarcusChief Executive Officer |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|