SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST(in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V)SIP Submitted by: PA DEP/Allegheny County Health DepartmentDate Submitted: June 4, 2008Subject: Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) Prevention of Significant Deterioration ProgramCompleteness ReviewCompleted by: Sharon McCauleyDate Completed: August 21, 2008Administrative MaterialsACCEPTABLEEPA REQUIREMENTSTATE SUBMITTAL(X)1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or hisdesignee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revisionthereof.1. June 26 letter from designee - Secretary PA DEP to EPAforwarding June 4 letter from Allegheny County. Enclosed is aletter dated May 7, 2008 from ACHD addressing the county’scompliance with Section 110 (a)(2)(c), (D)(i) and (J) for the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 NAAQSX2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State codeor body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consentagreement in final form. That evidence shall include the dateof adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of theplan, if different from the adoption/issuance date.2.Certification of Approval and Adoption included (dated5/15/08)Section 2102.07 of Article XXI Allegheny County HealthDept. RulesX3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authorityunder State law to adopt and implement the plan.3. Plan revision submitted through the PA DEP.X4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted forapproval and incorporation by reference into the plan,4.EPA REQUIREMENTSTATE SUBMITTAL(X)including indication of the changes made to the existingapproved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copyof the official State regulation/document signed, stamped,dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fullyenforceable by the State. The effective date of theregulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated inthe document itself.X5. Evidence that the State followed all of the proceduralrequirements of the State's laws and constitution in conductingand completing the adoption/issuance of the plan.5.X6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposedchange consistent with procedures approved by EPA, includingthe date of publication of such notice.6. Public notice and public hearing held on regulation. Letterof May 7, 2008 accompanied the submittal for addressing thecounty’s compliance with Section 110 (a)(2)(c), (D)(i) and (J)for the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 NAAQSX7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordancewith the information provided in the public notice and theState's laws and constitution, if applicable.7. Certification enclosedX8. Compilation of public comments and the State's responsethereto.8. No comments were receivedX1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan.1. PSD areasX2. Identification of the locations of affected sources includingthe EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locationsand the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s).2. PSD areas in Allegheny CountyX3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissionsfrom the affected sources; estimates of changes in currentactual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate,quantification of changes in actual emissions from affectedsources through calculations of the differences between certainbaseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a resultof the revision.3. N/AEPA REQUIREMENTSTATE SUBMITTAL(X)4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient airquality standards, prevention of significant deteriorationincrements, reasonable further progress demonstration, andvisibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approvedand implemented.4. IBR of PSD as of July 1, 2007. Also letter dated May 7,2008 addressing the county’s compliance with Section 110(a)(2)(c), (D)(i) and (J) for the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5NAAQSX5. Modeling information required to support the proposedrevision, including input data, output data, models used,ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used,justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes ofmodels used, assumptions, and other information relevant tothe determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis.5. N/A6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations arebased on continuous emission reduction technology.6. IBR of PSD RegsX7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, workpractice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements,where necessary, to ensure emission levels.7. IBR of PSD RegsX8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including howcompliance will be determined in practice.8. IBR of PSD RegsX9. Special economic and technological justifications requiredby any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate,explain why.)9. IBR of PSD Regs. Also May 7, 2008 County letteraddressing the county’s compliance with Section 110 (a)(2)(c),(D)(i) and (J) for the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 NAAQSX10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by amaintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevantNAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.10. N/A