alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012005EN.01000401.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 January 2012

2012/C 5/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2776 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 98,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4350 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8388 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2177 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,851 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 318,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6977 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4973 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3460 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3955 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2472 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3051 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9209 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6347 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6528 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 483,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,4241 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0689 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5350 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 632,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0161 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,364 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,8500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,474 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3523 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5457 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,3610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2776

JPY

Japanese yen

98,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4350

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82640

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8388

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2177

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,851

HUF

Hungarian forint

318,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6977

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4973

RON

Romanian leu

4,3460

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3955

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2472

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3051

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9209

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6347

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6528

KRW

South Korean won

1 483,11

ZAR

South African rand

10,4241

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0689

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5350

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 632,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0161

PHP

Philippine peso

56,364

RUB

Russian rouble

40,8500

THB

Thai baht

40,474

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3523

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5457

INR

Indian rupee

67,3610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Jeffory Alan WESA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1011.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 2, 1973.

Appeal quashed.
April22, 201~l 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Exemption No. 10344 from 14 CFR (FAR Section)- Part 121.311 (b); docket 

number F AA-2011-0815 

Dear U.S. Department of Transportation staff: 

I am requesting an extension of my exemption to use a previously approved car 

seat without my occupying an FAA-approved seat with a separate belt properly 

secured during movement on the surface, takeoff, and landing. The most recent 

use of my car seat on a jet plane was September/October 2012 to and from 

travel on Alaska Airlines/Horizon Airlines to Moscow, Idaho for my grandfather's 

memorial service. 

Please extend my exemption to the maximum extent allowed by law. We look 

forward to receiving a letter that my request was granted. 

If you have any questions for me, please contact Stephen Streeter, my father, or 

Nancy Streeter, my mother at (530) 758-7328 or by e-mail: 

nathestreeter@comcast. net. 

Stephen Streeter for Nathan Streeter 

Mini HD:Users:natestreeter:Desktop:Extension of Exemption No. 10344.docx
# C_2012215EN.01000202.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6608 — Tereos/Wilmar/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 215/03

On 11 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6608. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6608. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
256 La. 878

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Walter HALL, on Behalf of his Minor, Unemancipated Son, Louis Hall v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50910.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 6, 1970.

In re: Walter Hall, on behalf of his minor, unemancipated son, Louis Hall applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus or review, and alternative writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The ruling of the trial judge is correct.

HAMITER, C. J., absent.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Continental Information Systems
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May, 31 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jonah M. Meer , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                                         /s/  Jonah M. Meer
                                                         -----
                                                         Jonah M. Meer
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         August [____], 2002
August 18, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HAROLD BROWN, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00165-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 12   American General Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges    Years Ended December 31,(dollars in thousands)20082007200620052004Earnings:
(Loss) income before provision
for income taxes$ (924,693)$   106,512$   662,656$   809,839$   680,951Interest expense1,209,9201,205,6101,125,415866,203626,401Implicit interest in rents26,59221,33920,15218,83418,306Total earnings$   311,819$1,333,461$1,808,223$1,694,876$1,325,658Fixed charges:
Interest expense$1,209,920$1,205,610$1,125,415$   866,203$   626,401Implicit interest in rents26,59221,33920,15218,83418,306Total fixed charges$1,236,512$1,226,949$1,145,567$   885,037$   644,707Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges*0.251.091.581.922.06  * Earnings were inadequate to cover total fixed charges by $924.7 million in 2008.   152
#### William W. GRIFFITH, Appellant, v. Leslie K. GRIFFITH, Appellee.

No. 73-605.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
steam_record - Re: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2) 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Lafontaine, James K" <jlafontaine@rrienergy.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Lafontaine, James K" <jlafontaine@rrienergy.com> 

Date: 06/24/2010 11:59AM 

cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Jacklin, Mark J" 

<mjacklin@rrienergy.com>, "Berkebile, Rodney J" <rberkebile@rrienergy.com> 

Subject: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2) 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Lafontaine, James K" <jlafontaine@rrienergy.com>

Date: 6/28/2010 3:24 PM

Subject: Re: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2)

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28BE90DO... 3/1/2011
Dear Ms. Alicea:

Please see the attached Keystone ICR Extension Request.

Thank you,

James Lafontaine

General Manager

Keystone Generating Station

724-354-5450

[attachment "Keystone ICR Extension Request (2).doc" removed by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US]

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28BE90DO... 3/1/2011
#### SOUTHERN AIRWAYS, INC. and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Pauline P. WILSON, Appellee.

No. Q-197.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 18, 1972.

Robert P. Gaines, of Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for appellants.

Jerry W. Gerde, of Davenport, Johnston & Harris, Panama City, for appellee.

*269PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 112 (Wednesday, June 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 33550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13626]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0219; FRL-9911-66]

Pesticides; Consideration of Volatilization in Pesticide Risk 
Assessment: Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; re-opening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register issue of March 26, 
2014, concerning the availability of several guidance documents for 
public comment. This document reopens the comment period for 30 days. 
The comment period is being reopened to provide additional time for 
commenters to prepare their responses.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2014-0219, must be received on or before July 11, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES 
in the Federal Register document of March 26, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Health Effects Division 
(7509P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone 
number: (703) 305-0291; email address: smith.charles@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document reopens the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register issue of March 26, 2014 (79 
FR 16791) (FRL-9907-92), which requested comment on several draft 
guidance documents. Additional time to comment was requested by 
CropLife America. EPA is hereby reopening the comment period for 30 
days.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the March 26, 
2014, Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: June 2, 2014.
 Jack Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-13626 Filed 6-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
# C_2012300EN.01000102.xml

| 5.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6698 — Cheung Kong Holdings/Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings/Power Assets Holdings/MGN Gas Networks)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 300/02

On 26 September 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6698. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6698. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### MARSHALL HOUSING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-589.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 19, 1972.

Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Cristol, Rose & Aldrich, Miami, for appellant.

Albert L. Weintraub, Miami, for appel-lee.

*387Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Donch v. City of Miami, Fla.App. 1968, 214 So.2d 503.
# C_2012223EN.01000201.xml

| 27.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/2

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2012/C 223/02

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Monaco

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Monaco

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Monaco

Subject of commemoration: The 500th anniversary of the foundation of Monaco's Sovereignty, by founder Lucien 1er GRIMALDI

er

Description of the design: The inner part of the coin shows a portrait of Lucien 1er GRIMALDI in profile facing to the left. The words ‘SOUVERAINETE DE MONACO’ appear above the portrait in an arc along the upper edge of the inner part of the coin, flanked by the years ‘1512’ and ‘2012’. Two ornamental details are engraved at the beginning and at the end of the text. At the bottom, the horn of plenty, mintmark of the ‘Monnaie de Paris’, and the ‘fleurette’, hallmark of the engraving workshop, flank the portrait on the left hand side and the right hand side, respectively. Above the mintmark is engraved the inscription ‘Lucien Ier’.

er

er

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued:

Date of issue:

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# C_2013007EN.01000801.xml

| 11.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 January 2013

2013/C 7/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3113 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4607 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5666 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2104 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,2980 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,629 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 291,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6966 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0888 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3757 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3275 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2403 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2928 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1645 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5550 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6059 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 389,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3378 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1630 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5720 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 668,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9727 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,227 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,7292 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,732 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6720 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6112 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,6671 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3113

JPY

Japanese yen

115,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4607

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81720

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5666

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2104

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,2980

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,629

HUF

Hungarian forint

291,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6966

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0888

RON

Romanian leu

4,3757

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3275

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2403

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2928

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1645

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5550

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6059

KRW

South Korean won

1 389,38

ZAR

South African rand

11,3378

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1630

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5720

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 668,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9727

PHP

Philippine peso

53,227

RUB

Russian rouble

39,7292

THB

Thai baht

39,732

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6720

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6112

INR

Indian rupee

71,6671

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 090

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### David S. RENIER, Appellant, v. William G. NEWSOM, Jr., Appellee.

No. 73-776.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Frederick Pfeiffer, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
1

Kenneth Carlisle McAlister III

requests exemption from the CFR’s stated below in regards to operating a UAS for 

commercial/business purposes

UAS aircraft application-DJI Phantom 3

DJI Inspire

All exemption requests are made purely for the operation of UAV’s only 

61.101(e)(4) & (5), 61.113(a) & (b), 61.23(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) 

Petitioner name and address:

 Kenneth C. McAlister III

649 Watkins Road

Jamestown, Ohio

45335

 
2

With complete and total regards to safety, I will conduct situational awareness including but not 

limited to constant vigilance of my operation procedures and tactics. These steps will include 

maintaining legal flight conditions, proper maintenance of all equipment and adherence to all 

applicable regulations. Furthermore, as the operator I will keep current on any changes that 

should occur regarding UAV operations. Finally, application of good common sense will always 

be engaged before, during and after any flight operation. There is no substitute for being aware 

of changing conditions, keeping situational awareness, getting the “big picture” and keeping your 

eyes moving. I am a commercial driver with 28 years of driving excellence without a single 

accident and am actively involved in our company safety committee. I have held a private 

certificate since 1989, actively fly paramotors and fixed wing ultralights as well without incident. 

As for public interest, I feel responsible operation of UAVs for any commercial photography, 

filming video or observation is superior to full size aircraft being in close proximity to persons or 

property. UAVs clearly offer advantages not found just a few years ago and it is my desire to 

pursue the possibilities of these platforms thus greatly reducing the impact to the public by less 

noise and reduced signature over manned aircraft. There are numerous aspects of UAVs that are 

also superior, including but not limited to: no emissions, reduced noise, slower airspeeds, less 

mass and environmental impact over larger manned aircraft.

The proposed operations will include: aerial photography of structures, aerial photography of 

property for either sale or donation. In addition, I would be assisting in agriculture observation 

for crop conditions, damage verification such as storms, flooding, pests and drought. I would 

also like to be able to assist in any search and rescue if approached with such a request. All these 

items stated are examples however, I wish to be able to offer any services for hire where a UAV 

can safely and legally be utilized.

The UAVs I request to be authorized to use are the DJI Phantom 3 and the DJI Inspire.

I respectfully appreciate your consideration;

Kenneth C. McAlister III