alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           10871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    34693
<ALLOWANCES>                                       495
<INVENTORY>                                      27931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 75965
<PP&E>                                            9969
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  107984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            44772
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       60038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    107984
<SALES>                                         113880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                120170
<CGS>                                            78661
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   109079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   316
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  10883
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4266
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              11821
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     11821
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
        

</TABLE>
#### Diane ROSOKOFF, Petitioner, v. ZAYRE OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH, INC., Respondent.

No. 43551.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 275 So.2d 614.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT
TO THE 


FATHOM
HOLDINGS INC.


2019
omnibus STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Fathom Holdings
Inc. (the “Company”) deem it to be in the best interests of the Company to amend, and to have approved at the
next annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company, the amendment of the Fathom Holdings Inc. 2019 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) as set forth below;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows.


 


1. Section 3 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety
and the following substituted in lieu thereof:


 


3.     Stock
Subject to the Plan.


 


(a)     Subject to adjustment as described in
Section 13 below, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards (including Incentive Stock Options)
is Four Million Sixty Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy-Eight (4,060,778) Shares. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired
Common Stock.


 


(b)     Any Shares covered by an Award (or portion
of an Award) which is forfeited, canceled or expires (whether voluntarily or involuntarily) shall be deemed not to have been issued for
purposes of determining the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan, except that the maximum aggregate number
of Shares which may be issued pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options shall not exceed the number specified in Section 3(a).
Shares that actually have been issued under the Plan pursuant to an Award shall not be returned to the Plan and shall not become available
for future issuance under the Plan, except that if unvested Shares are forfeited or repurchased by the Company, such Shares shall become
available for future grant under the Plan. In the event any Option or other Award granted under the Plan is exercised through the tendering
of Shares (either actually or through attestation), or in the event tax withholding obligations are satisfied by tendering or withholding
Shares, any Shares so tendered or withheld shall not again be available for awards under the Plan. To the extent that cash in lieu of
Shares is delivered upon the exercise of a SAR pursuant to Section 6(m), the Company shall be deemed, for purposes of applying the limitation
on the number of shares, to have issued the number of Shares that it was entitled to issue upon such exercise or on the exercise of any
related Option, notwithstanding that cash was issued in lieu of such Shares. Shares reacquired by the Company on the open market or otherwise
using cash proceeds from the exercise of Options shall not be available for awards under the Plan.


 


2. Except as herein amended, the terms and provisions
of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as originally adopted and approved, as amended to date.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of
the Company attests that the foregoing Amendment to the Fathom Holdings Inc. 2019 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan was adopted by the Company’s
Board of Directors on September 6, 2022.


 


	 	FATHOM HOLDINGS INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Joshua Harley
	 	 	 
	 	 	Joshua Harley
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.84 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, MARCH 14, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to Montana http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  https://www.census.gov/rdo http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html Please visit http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/ for an interactive map showcasing county-level population change from 1960 to 2010, as well as state-level data on race and Hispanic or Latino origin for 2010. The widget will be updated as states are released and can be embedded on your website. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2012038EN.01000301.xml

| 11.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 February 2012

2012/C 38/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3189 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 102,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4322 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83630 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8065 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2098 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6180 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,245 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 293,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6990 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2188 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3540 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3305 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2381 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3225 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2302 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5948 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6635 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 483,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1900 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3013 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5890 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 848,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0042 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,086 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6746 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,741 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2767 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8943 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,2720 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3189

JPY

Japanese yen

102,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4322

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83630

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8065

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2098

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6180

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,245

HUF

Hungarian forint

293,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6990

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2188

RON

Romanian leu

4,3540

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3305

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2381

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3225

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2302

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5948

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6635

KRW

South Korean won

1 483,83

ZAR

South African rand

10,1900

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3013

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5890

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 848,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0042

PHP

Philippine peso

56,086

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6746

THB

Thai baht

40,741

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2767

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8943

INR

Indian rupee

65,2720

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Sinclair HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-417.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 17, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  Third Quarter 1997 and 1996

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)

                                                   Third quarter 1997

                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      8.6       8.1       7.0      10.4       8.0
      For rent...........................      2.6       2.5       2.3       2.8       2.6
      For sale only......................      0.9       0.9       0.8       1.1       0.9
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.7       0.9       0.9       0.7
      Held off market....................      4.3       4.0       3.1       5.6       3.8
        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.2       0.6       2.3       1.6
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.9       0.6       0.8       0.7
        For other reasons................      2.0       1.9       1.8       2.4       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.9       4.0       2.7       2.6       2.6

    Occupied.............................     88.5      88.0      90.3      87.0      89.3



                                                   Third quarter 1996

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      8.9       8.4       7.6      10.1       8.7
      For rent...........................      2.7       2.8       2.3       2.7       2.9
      For sale only......................      1.0       0.9       0.9       1.1       1.0
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.7       0.9       0.9       0.8
      Held off market....................      4.4       4.0       3.6       5.4       4.1
        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.3       0.7       2.1       1.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.7       0.7       0.8       0.7       0.6
        For other reasons................      2.1       2.1       2.1       2.6       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.8       3.8       2.4       2.9       2.2

    Occupied.............................     88.3      87.8      90.0      87.0      89.1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,815
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,796
<PP&E>                                         122,371
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,535)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,985
<BONDS>                                         90,049
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,683
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,859
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,097
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                       509
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       747
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.08
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) 

### ) Cutter Enterprises, LLC ) ) Under Contract No. W912TF-14-D-0513 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61936

Peter J. Martin, Esq.

Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP Hartford, CT Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney Harry M. Parent III, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: July 18, 2019

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 61936, Appeal ofCutter Enterprises, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### Bill L. ENGEL, Appellant, v. Edward J. STACK, Sheriff, Broward County, Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 27, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; J. Cail Lee, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000948218
<NAME> MINN DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                              25
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     58,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,069
<PP&E>                                         168,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,401
<BONDS>                                         11,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,483
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,202
<SALES>                                        142,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,683
<CGS>                                           57,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,327
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,577
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,577
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                          23,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  163,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,195
<INVENTORY>                                    124,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               320,144
<PP&E>                                         734,878
<DEPRECIATION>                               (324,697)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 817,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,208
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           465
<OTHER-SE>                                     341,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   817,498
<SALES>                                        389,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               389,251
<CGS>                                          286,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  346,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,697
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,295
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55


</TABLE>
260 La. 407

#### VERMILION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD v. Alphe BROUSSARD et al.

No. 52020.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 17, 1972.

In re: Alphe Broussard, Myrtis Odille Broussard, Martha Cade Broussard and Flying “J” Ranch Lane, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vermilion. 254 So.2d 699.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant he notified.

SUMMERS, L, is recused.
# C_2011355EN.01000101.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/1

---

2011/C 355/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 347, 26.11.2011

OJ C 347, 26.11.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 340, 19.11.2011

OJ C 331, 12.11.2011

OJ C 319, 29.10.2011

OJ C 311, 22.10.2011

OJ C 305, 15.10.2011

OJ C 298, 8.10.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin, Room 245

Houston, Texas 77002

To: County Clerk January 22, 2015

County: Brazoria (Criminal)

Subject: RETURN OF ORIGINAL EXHIBITS

Please acknowledge the receipt of the original exhibits listed below. Please sign and return 

the original to this court.

14-12-00642-CR Kenneth Lee Douds v The State of Texas 180270

Defendant’s Exhibit 2, a DVD

Received by: ________________________________________

Received on: ________________________________________
No. 11139.

#### L. P. Hazen & Co. *v.*The Brown & Ketcham Iron Co.

Decided November 9, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Raymond Ratliff,*for plaintiff' in error.

*Messrs. Cobb, Howard & Bailey,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of *The William Edwards Co.*v. *Goldstein,*80 Ohio St., 303.

Crew,' C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 13, 2006/s/ Douglas W. Stotlar

Name: Douglas W. StotlarTitle: Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 13, 2006/s/ Kevin C. Schick

Name: Kevin C. SchickTitle: Chief Financial Officer