alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Parking Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Emanuel Eads, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                          /s/ JEFF HEAVRIN
                                          ------------------------
                                          Jeff Heavrin
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

   A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CENTRAL PARKING
CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF
UPON REQUEST.

   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing. This certification is executed as of February 9, 2006.
<PAGE> 103
                                                                      Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
           American General Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



<CAPTION>
                                          Years Ended December 31,
                           2003        2002         2001        2000       1999
                                           (dollars in thousands)
<S>                       <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>        <C>
Earnings:
  Income before
    provision for
    income taxes          $  571,587  $   496,270  $  394,217  $  408,803  $352,751
  Interest expense           538,858      553,877     620,487     677,372   563,966
  Implicit interest
    in rents                  18,382       17,690      16,863      16,310    15,641

Total earnings            $1,128,827   $1,067,837  $1,031,567  $1,102,485  $932,358


Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense        $  538,858   $  553,877  $  620,487  $  677,372  $563,966
  Implicit interest
    in rents                  18,382       17,690      16,863      16,310    15,641

Total fixed charges       $  557,240   $  571,567  $  637,350  $  693,682  $579,607


Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges                 2.03         1.87        1.62        1.59     1 .61
</TABLE>
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Russell DONOVAN and Gary D. Fitchlee, Appellees.

No. 71-530.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases African American Business Ownership
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-R.19 **Contact:**  Briana Kaya Public Information Office
301-763-3030/3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, FEB. 8, 2011 Census Bureau Reports a 70 Percent Increase in the Number of Black-Owned Businesses in the Miami Metro Area The number of black-owned businesses in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, Fla., metropolitan statistical area increased to 99,512 in 2007 from 58,559 in 2002, a 69.9 percent increase, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today. Over the same period, receipts generated by these businesses increased 61.8 percent to $4.9 billion. Nationally, the number of black-owned businesses rose to 1.9 million, a 60.5 percent increase, and sales by these businesses increased to $137.5 billion, a 55.1 percent increase. Industries in the metro area with the largest number of black-owned businesses included health care and social assistance (21,267 businesses); repair, maintenance, personal and laundry services (20,808 businesses); and administrative and support and waste management and remediation services (12,050 businesses). These new data come from the 2007 Survey of Business Owners, which is part of the 2007 Economic Census. This survey provides detailed information every five years for black-owned businesses, including the number of firms, sales and receipts, number of paid employees and annual payroll for states, counties, cities and metropolitan areas.  https://www.census.gov/econ/sbo/methodology.html
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
```

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard A. Wisot, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Proliance
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005                 /s/ Richard A. Wisot
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard A. Wisot
                                        Chief Financial Officer
```
Exhibit
32.2

SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION



I, Scott M. Carson, Chief Financial Officer of Eye Care International, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted by
sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) |  | the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial  condition and result of
operations of Eye Care International, Inc..     

Dated: October 15, 2004

| | /s/ Scott M.
                                                                  Carson
                                                                  Scott M. Carson
                                                                  Chief
                                                                  Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSOLIDATED EDISON OF NEW YORK, INC.

                           Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                               Twelve Months Ended
                             (Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          YEAR        YEAR           YEAR          YEAR           YEAR
                                          1995        1996           1997          1998           1999
<S>                                       <C>        <C>            <C>           <C>            <C>

Earnings
     Net Income                           $  723,850  $  694,085 ** $  712,823      $745,140       $711,843
     Federal Income Tax                      328,600     355,590       357,100       327,805        857,818
     Federal Income Tax Deferred              78,330      49,510        31,450        95,140       (454,578)
     Investment Tax Credits                   (9,310)     (8,910)       (8,830)       (8,710)       (37,159)
     Deferred

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Total Earnings Before          1,121,470   1,090,275     1,092,543     1,159,375      1,077,924
            Federal Income Tax

Fixed Charges*                               350,254     343,308       353,689       345,513        340,344
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Total Earnings Before Federal Income
            Tax
               And Fixed Charges          $1,471,724  $1,433,583    $1,446,232    $1,504,888     $1,418,268
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



     * Fixed
     Charges

     Interest on                           $ 287,842    $296,443      $306,109      $294,894       $291,747
     Long-Term Debt
     Amortization of Debt Discount,           14,075      11,376        12,049        13,777         13,514
     Premium and Expense
     Interest on Component of                 19,383      18,157        18,448        18,442         17,720
     Rentals
     Other                                    28,954      17,332        17,083        18,400         17,363
     Interest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            Total Fixed Charges            $ 350,254    $343,308      $353,689      $345,513       $340,344
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



     Ratio of Earnings to Fixed                4.20        4.18          4.09          4.36           4.17
     Charges
</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-2050

_____________________________

AMY DIANA LAVANDIER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

September 14, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
AAM-12-261-E April 11, 2012

Exemption No. 10502 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0138

Mr. Tony L. Lindstrom Sunset Helicopters, Inc. 23115 Airport Road #12 Aurora, OR 97002

Dear Mr. Lindstrom:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 5, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Sunset Helicopters, Inc. (Sunset) for an exemption from §§ 120.117(d) and 120.225(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Sunset to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Sunset.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Sunset Helicopters, Inc. an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Sunset to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Sunset are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the Sunset part 135 operation, not under part 91

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SERGEI KOVALEV,

Petitioner

v.

AKASH ASHOK BAROT, DDS., NORTHWOOD DENTAL GROUP, LLC

AKA/DBA NORTHWOOD AESTHETIC DENTAL, JANE DOE I, JANE DOE II, AND HIRABEN PROPERTIES, LLC,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 25 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Alexander F. SZUBA, Appellant, v. Frank MORA, Jr., Appellee.

No. 7338.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 18, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.
# m3-outp-isp
## NJDEP Best Management Practices for Dental Facilities

Adopted under N.J.A.C. 7:14A-21.12(d)



### DO:

• Use mercury-free material when appropriate;

• Use precapsulated alloys only;

• Recycle used disposable capsules containing amalgam ;

• Maintain and operate the amalgam separator when ins talled according to its manufacturer’s specifications;

• Install chair-side amalgam traps in both the vacuum system and cuspidor of each operatory where restoration work is done;

• Change and clean chair-side amalgam traps frequentl y;

• Use only non-bleach, non-chlorine cleaners to clean vacuum system lines;

• Appropriately disinfect and store amalgam pieces fr om removal and restoration with amalgam waste;

• Store amalgam waste in airtight containers;

• Have a licensed recycling contractor, mail-in servi ce or hazardous waste hauler remove amalgam waste;

• Recycle all amalgam waste containing mercury;

• Train staff in the proper handling, management, and disposal of mercury containing material; and

• Keep records to document that the BMP requirements are being met.



### DON’T:

• Use bulk elemental mercury;

• Rinse traps or vacuum pump filters over drains or i n the sinks;

• Throw or place the disposable trap, sludge from reu sable trap, or vacuum pump filter or contents with regular garbage;

• Throw or place the disposable trap, sludge from reu sable trap, or vacuum pump filter or contents into sharps containers or b iohazard bag; and

• Flush amalgam waste down the drain.

## NJDEP Best Management Practices for Dental Facilities

Adopted under N.J.A.C. 7:14A-21.12(d)

Best Management Practices require a dental facility to, at a minimum:

1. Use mercury-free material when appropriate; 2. Eliminate all use of bulk elemental mercury; 3. Use precapsulated alloys only; 4. Recycle used disposable capsules containing ama lgam; 5. Maintain and operate the amalgam separator when installed according to its manufacturer’s specifications; 6. Install chair-side amalgam traps in both the va cuum system and cuspidor of each operatory where restoration work is done; 7. Change and clean chair-side amalgam traps frequ ently; 8. Not rinse traps or vacuum pump filters over dra ins or in the sinks; 9. Not throw or place the disposable trap, sludge from reusable trap, or vacuum pump filter or contents with regular garbage; 10. Not throw or place the disposable trap, sludge from reusable trap, or vacuum pump filter or contents into sharps c ontainers or biohazard bag; 11. Not flush amalgam waste down the drain; 12. Use only non-bleach, non-chlorine cleaners to clean vacuum system lines; 13. Appropriately disinfect and store amalgam piec es from removal and restoration with amalgam waste; 14. Store amalgam waste in airtight containers; 15. Have a licensed recycling contractor, mail-in service or hazardous waste hauler remove amalgam waste; 16. Recycle all amalgam waste containing mercury; 17. Train staff in the proper handling, management , and disposal of mercury containing material; and 18. Keep records to document that the BMP requirem ents are being met.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

W.M., a minor child, by and through his guardian JACQUELINE 

WEAVER, and EARL J. LLOYD,

Appellees.

Nos. 4D15-1194 and 4D15-1349

[ July 13, 2017 ]

Consolidated appeals and cross-appeals from the Circuit Court for the 

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Patti Englander Henning, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE09025532 (26).

Melinda S. Thornton and Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., 

Miami, for appellant/cross-appellee Progressive American Insurance 

Company.

Paul Morris of Law Offices of Paul Morris, P.A., Miami, and David L. 

Deehl of Deehl PLLC, Coral Gables, for appellee/cross-appellant W.M., a 

minor child, by and through his guardian Jacqueline Weaver.

Weslee L. Ferron, Daniel A. Martinez and Kelly J. McAuley of Martinez 

Denbo, LLC, St. Petersburg, for appellee/cross-appellant Earl J. Lloyd.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CheckFree Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Peter J. Kight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                          /s/ Peter J. Kight
                        -------------------------------------------------------
                        Peter J. Kight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
                        CheckFree Corporation
                        May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CheckFree Corporation and will be retained by CheckFree Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 11849.

#### The Edward H. Everett Co. *v.*The German American Insurance Co.

Decided February 23, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Licking county.

*Messrs. Flory & Flory*and *Mr. Robbins Hunter,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. W. Mooney,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.