alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bernard Ware, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10KSB of Preferred Financial Resources,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Preferred
Financial Resources, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4. The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for Preferred
Financial Resources, Inc and have:

i. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to Preferred Financial Resources, Inc., including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
prepared;

ii. Evaluated the effectiveness of Preferred Financial Resources, Inc.'s
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date"); and

iii. Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5. The other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the Preferred Financial Resources, Inc. auditors and the audit
committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
function):

i. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect Preferred Financial Resources, Inc.'s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
Preferred Financial Resources, Inc.'s auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and

ii. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and

6. I and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or
not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 4, 2004

/s/ Bernard Ware
    -----------------------
    Bernard Ware
    Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6545

GENE WAYNE HAYMOND,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

PAT CHAVIS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., District Judge. (5:13-cv-00019-RJC)

Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gene Wayne Haymond, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Babb, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gene Wayne Haymond seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Haymond has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny Haymond’s motion for a certificate of appealability, 

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         201,663
<SECURITIES>                                    45,390
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,127)
<INVENTORY>                                     86,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               454,762
<PP&E>                                          18,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,832)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                     379,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   505,502
<SALES>                                         80,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,008
<CGS>                                           51,629
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (303)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,797
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,208
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Fourth Quarter 2000 and 1999

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     Fourth quarter 2000
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.5        7.8       11.1
      For rent............................       2.5        2.6        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.0        0.9        1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.6        0.6        0.6
      Held off market.....................       4.4        3.7        7.0
        For occasional use................       1.5        1.1        2.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.9
        For other reasons.................       2.1        1.7        3.4

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.5        7.9

    Occupied..............................      88.6       90.7       81.1



                                                     Fourth Quarter 1999
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.8        8.0       11.7
      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.0        0.9        1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.7        0.7        0.7
      Held off market.....................       4.5        3.7        7.6
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        3.3
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.1        1.7        3.5

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.6        1.5        6.9

    Occupied..............................      88.6       90.5       81.5
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                            McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

            Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, Independent Auditor

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Cone Mills Corporation's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-31977; 33-31979; 33-51951; 33-
51953; 33-53705 and 33-67800) of our reports, dated February 10, 2001, with re-
spect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the An-
nual Report on Form 10-K of Cone Mills Corporation for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000.



/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
______________________________________
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 27, 2001

                                       61
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-2055

JOHN WILLIAMS MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

APPLE, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at

Columbia. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00844-TMC)

Submitted: June 22, 2023 Decided: June 26, 2023

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Williams Miller, Appellant Pro Se. William Harrell Foster, III, Katie Elizabeth 

Towery, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2055 Doc: 30 Filed: 06/26/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

John Williams Miller appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant summary judgment on 

Miller’s employment discrimination complaint. On appeal, Miller challenges the court’s 

prior order denying Miller’s motions for default judgment. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Miller 

v. Apple, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-00844-TMC (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2022). We deny Miller’s motion 

for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2055 Doc: 30 Filed: 06/26/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <ARTICLE>                          5
            
     <S>                                <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
     <PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998
     <CASH>                                2881303
     <SECURITIES>                                0
     <RECEIVABLES>                         4749480
     <ALLOWANCES>                            82193
     <INVENTORY>                                 0
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                      3276239
     <PP&E>                              133675214
     <DEPRECIATION>                       49090912
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                      199167210
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                23670507
     <BONDS>                             174143702
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
     <PREFERRED>                                 0
     <COMMON>                                    0
     <OTHER-SE>                                  0
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        199167210
     <SALES>                                     0
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                     17331068
     <CGS>                                       0
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                        17186401
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    5204463
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                             0
     <INCOME-TAX>                                0
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
     <DISCONTINUED>                              0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                       1201867
     <CHANGES>                                   0
     <NET-INCOME>                         (3857929)
     <EPS-PRIMARY>                               0
     <EPS-DILUTED>                               0
             


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KASEY NICOLE TODI, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1574

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 21, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota 

County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
# CA2011284DE.01000101.xml

| 28.9.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 284/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 284/1

---

RESERVELISTE (1)

1

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN

EPSO/AD/193/10

RECHTS- UND SPRACHSACHVERSTÄNDIGE (AD 7) FÜR DIE DEUTSCHE SPRACHE (DE)

(2011/C 284 A/01)

Zweig „Parlament/Rat“

| HAHN | Volker |
| --- | --- |
| KEIDEL | Andreas |
| KRAAK | Katharina Elisabeth Dagmar |
| MANTLIK | Emmanuelle Raphaela |
| PETERS | Tim |
| PUFFER-MARIETTE | Jean-Christophe |
| SCHONARD | Pascal |
| WIEMANN | Rebekka |

HAHN

Volker

KEIDEL

Andreas

KRAAK

Katharina Elisabeth Dagmar

MANTLIK

Emmanuelle Raphaela

PETERS

Tim

PUFFER-MARIETTE

Jean-Christophe

SCHONARD

Pascal

WIEMANN

Rebekka

Die Reserveliste gilt bis zum 29. Juli 2012. Ihre Geltungsdauer kann verlängert werden.

29. Juli 2012

---

(1)  Auf ausdrücklichen Wunsch einer erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmerin oder eines erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmers wird ihr bzw. sein Name nicht veröffentlicht.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          70,155
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 537,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        448,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   537,620
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,151
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    654
<INCOME-TAX>                                       269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                385
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Cecil Calvert CAMPER, Appellee.

No. 77-1899.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 4, 1978.

Maurice J. Hall, Asst. State’s Atty., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

MOORE, Judge.

The State appeals the granting of appel-lee’s motion for discharge pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.191(a)(1). In *Eaddy v. State,*352 So.2d 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) this court held that the speedy trial time does not begin to run in favor of an individual who is incarcerated in another jurisdiction and against whom a detainer has been lodged until the authority which filed the detainer obtains custody of the individual. It is unfortunate that the learned trial judge was without the benefit of *Eaddy, supra,*at the time of his decision. Accordingly, the trial court’s order discharging the appellee is REVERSED and this cause REMANDED with instructions to reinstate the charges against the appellee.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION**
 
 
 
 I, Clark
A. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer of The Amacore Group, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Eye
      Care International, Inc..
 
 Dated:
May 16, 2005
 
 /s/
      Clark A.
      Marcus
      Clark
      A. Marcus
      Chief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                         SPEEDFAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
  THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1997 AND FEBRUARY 29, 1996
           (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
 
                                                            Three Months Ended                    Nine Months Ended
                                                        February 28,  February 29,          February 28,      February 29,
                                                        ------------  ------------          ------------      ------------
                                                            1997          1996                  1997              1996
                                                        ------------  ------------          ------------      ------------
<S>                                                     <C>           <C>                   <C>                <C>
Net Earnings                                              $ 4,909       $ 4,360               $13,730            $6,689
                                                          =======       =======               =======            ======
Weighted average shares:
  Common shares outstanding                                10,957        10,397                10,694             8,978
  Common equivalent shares issuable upon
   exercise of employee stock options using
   the treasury stock method                                  844           814                   769               812
                                                          -------       -------               -------            ------
Shares used in net earnings per share                      11,801        11,211                11,463             9,790
                                                          =======       =======               =======            ======
Net earnings per share                                    $  0.42       $  0.39               $  1.20            $ 0.68
                                                          =======       =======               =======            ======
</TABLE>