alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,483,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,793,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,243,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,562,000
<PP&E>                                           6,542,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,160,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,364,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,948,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        23,751,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,625,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,364,000
<SALES>                                          8,072,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,072,000
<CGS>                                            3,732,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,438,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (11,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (109,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (98,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (98,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)



</TABLE>
#### Melvyn KESSLER, Appellant, v. LAWYERS CO-OP PUBLISHING CO., Appellee.

No. 71-1202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 5, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Third Quarter 1999 and 1998

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     Third quarter 1999
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       9.2        8.4       12.3
      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.4
      For sale only.......................       0.9        0.8        1.4
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.9        0.9        0.9
      Held off market.....................       4.7        3.9        7.6
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        3.3
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.2        1.9        3.6

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.8        6.8

    Occupied..............................      87.9       90.0       80.9



                                                     Third quarter 1998
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       9.0        8.3       11.5
      For rent............................       2.7        2.8        2.2
      For sale only.......................       1.0        0.9        1.4
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.8        0.7
      Held off market.....................       4.4        3.7        7.1
        For occasional use................       1.5        1.1        2.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.7        0.7        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.2        1.8        3.6

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.7        7.2

    Occupied..............................      88.2       90.0       81.3
# C_2012163EN.01000101.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6585 — CNP Assurances/Swisslife France/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 163/01

On 25 May 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6585. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6585. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CARLOS BELTRAN FELIX, AKA

Juan Carlos Beltran,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 73387

Agency No. A205

- 414

- 882

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2019 **

Before: CANBY

, TASHIMA , and CHRISTEN , Circuit Judges.

Juan Carlos Beltran Felix, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for adjustment of

status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo clai ms of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 17

- 73387

due process violations

. Padilla

- Martinez v. Holder

, 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir.

2014) . We deny the petition for review.

Beltran Felix’s due process claim fails, where the IJ gave him the

opportunity to request a continuance to present his wife’s testimony, but he opted

to complete the hearing that day without her testimony

. See i d. (“ To prevail on a

due

- process claim, a petitioner must demonstrate both a violation of rights and

prejudice.” )

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.