alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1 

3a 75 79 

June 7, 2010 

Document Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

4 ~. 

. 

~ 

Re: EPA - HQ - OPPT - 2003 - 0012 

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal - Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

March 2010 Sample Data 

Dear Document Control Office : 

As per Part IV, Section G.5 .a of the NJPDES permit, we are submitting a summary of PFOA 

analytical results for the weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A to NJDEP on a 

monthly basis. Per your request, we are sending you a paper and electronic-copy of the report for 

samples taken during March 2010 . We will continue to send you the reports each month. 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (856) 540-3015 . 

Sincerely, 

Joe Greenfield 

SHE Consultant - Environmental 

DuPont Chambers Works 

Enclosures 

A,qPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

, "j Chambers Works 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

CONTAINS NO CBI 
Copies to: 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) 

Principal Environmental Engineer 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Point Source Permitting - Region 2 

401 E. State Street 

P.O. Box 029 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0029 
U N 

L 

>, CN 

CC 

C 

I II ' II I~ II i I 

i ii 

I 

I ~ 

I 

n ' O I C I jO 

C~~N I I I ' ,N i '~ I I 

I I 7 C~ NI I cI I I 

N ICl) ~~~ 

~ 

I 

i I ~ I 

I ~' ~ y I II I , I . I IL ' 

I 

~ ~ ~ 

~ i ~, I U_ 

Lr] IC O IC ,r d- I ' ~ > , 

Q 

~ ILr]' 

I i 7:3 

0~ ~C I iC 'O I '~ ~O ~ ~~ I - I ~ I '~ , 

Q I` ,, 

I 

, 

C°) ' i 

I i U I I O I N 

~ ~ '~ i 

p i 

CI I I ' ~ O ~ 'tDi '~ i 

, i I I i ~ I U I I ~ I I I , I 

n 'o jc Ic ~r J o ', I a .~ ', ~ a~ I I 

- 

, 

I 

ii 

U IM ' I ~ I O ~ , I , LL m'~ I 

i I ~ ~ ' I 

7 li 

I~I' I cn 

I 

G Q ..V 

L9i-i~l10 

,I I~~ H ~ I ~~' ~ I 

- ~ i 

, - ti I I 

X 

> O 

J 

O ` 

c 

N 

CO 

3 

O 

2 

E 

C 

C 

O 

U 

N 

N 

I I 

7 

V
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000023426
<NAME> THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            1,772,650
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                            607,964
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 317,285
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             2,600,385
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       5,298,284
<COMMON>                                               122,229
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                              665,598
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                    153,254
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                         941,497
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   79,789
<PREFERRED>                                            116,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                 1,241,051
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                     101,700
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                          159,005
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                               19,750
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                             50,969
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                        93,431
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                       2,495,308
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                        5,298,284
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                            2,452,855
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                    85,138
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           2,156,047
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           2,278,106
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                174,749
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                     (86,787)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                         124,883
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               138,451
<NET-INCOME>                                           (13,568)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             12,832
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                          (26,400)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                     0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                              127,533
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                 299,427
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.1


 


Supplemental
Agreement to Share Subscription Agreement


 


This
supplemental agreement (this “Agreement”) to the share subscription agreement dated June 3, 2022 (the “Share Subscription
Agreement”) is signed by the Party A and Party B (together, the “Parties”) on October 19, 2022. Unless otherwise specified,
terms used in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as those defined in the Share Subscription Agreement.


 


	Party
    A: 	 	Unex
    Holdings Inc. 
	Address:
    	 	31-A2,
    Jalan 5-32A
	 	 	6
    1/2 Miles Off Jalan Kepong 


 


	Party
    B: 	 	Wong
    Hon Wai
	Malaysia
    Passport Number: 	 	******
	Address:
    	 	******


 


WHEREAS:



 


		A.	Pursuant
                                            to the Share Subscription Agreement, Party A has agreed to issue and sell and Party B has
                                            agreed to subscribed for and to purchase, 5,000 shares of common stock of Party A, at a purchase
                                            price of US$2.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of US$12,500.00. 



 


		B.	Subject
                                            to Clause 2.2 of the Share Subscription Agreement, the Closing shall take place remotely
                                            by electronic means (i) five (5) business days from the date of the Share Subscription Agreement,
                                            or (ii) any other date as may be agreed by the Subscriber and the Company in writing (the
                                            “Closing Date”).



 


IT
IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:- 


 


		1.	The
                                            Parties hereby agree that the Closing shall take place remotely by electronic means on November
                                            1, 2022. 



 


		2.	All
                                            other provisions in the Share Subscription Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force
                                            and effect. In the event of any inconsistency between the Share Subscription Agreement and
                                            this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.



 


		3.	This
                                            Agreement and all questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation
                                            of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state
                                            of New York without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule thereof.



 


(Signature
page follows)


 




    	1



     


    

 


Party
A


 


	/s/
    Low Wai Koon	 
	For
    and on behalf of	 
	Unex
    Holdings Inc. 	 


 


Party
B


 


	/s/
    Wong Hon Wai	 
	Wong
    Hon Wai	 


 




    	2
# C_2012167EN.01001701.xml

| 13.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/17

---

Special Report No 7/2012 ‘The reform of the common organisation of the market in wine: Progress to date’

2012/C 167/06

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 7/2012 ‘The reform of the common organisation of the market in wine: Progress to date’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
#### Harry E. ROTH v. Katherine Gaidry ROTH.

No. 61487.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Harry E. Roth, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Terrebonne. 353 So.2d 352.

Denied.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.136 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3691
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 2010 2010 Census: Illinois Approaches Its 2000 Mail Participation Rate As of Friday, April 16, Illinois is just one percentage point away from matching the mail participation rate it achieved in the 2000 Census, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today.  New rates released today show that 72 percent of Illinoisans have mailed back their forms so far, compared with 73 percent in 2000. The nation as a whole — at 69 percent — is still three percentage points away from matching the mail response rate achieved in 2000 (72 percent). A number of counties and cities across the country have already matched or exceeded their Census 2000 rates (see: http://2010.census.gov/news/xls/match_surpassed_4-16.xls [Excel] for the full list). “If you mail back your 2010 Census today you can ensure that your household is counted,” U.S. Census Bureau Director Robert Groves said. Households that normally pick up their mail from a post office box are already slated for in-person follow-up from census workers. The rates for all states, counties, places, towns and townships are updated each afternoon through April 23 at 4:00 p.m. on the Take 10 Challenge Map (http://2010.census.gov/2010census/take10map/). A final rate will be announced May 3. ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are used to apportion congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to tribal, state and local governments each year and to make decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census form is one of the shortest in U.S. history, consisting of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict confidentiality laws protect the respondents and the information they provide.
 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office/troubleshoot/excel/get-latest-excel-viewer
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Bobby Lee JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-400.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 24, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 12, 1973.

Bobby Lee Jones, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, *53418 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
# C_2012076EN.01000801.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 March 2012

2012/C 76/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3062 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4349 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83140 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8830 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2110 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5470 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,615 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1545 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3459 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2474 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2927 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1390 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6082 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6546 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 474,59 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9960 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2719 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5298 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 977,40 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9954 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,025 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,4940 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,205 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3614 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4549 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,3430 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3062

JPY

Japanese yen

109,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4349

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83140

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8830

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2110

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5470

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,615

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1545

RON

Romanian leu

4,3655

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3459

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2474

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2927

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1390

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6082

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6546

KRW

South Korean won

1 474,59

ZAR

South African rand

9,9960

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2719

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5298

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 977,40

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9954

PHP

Philippine peso

56,025

RUB

Russian rouble

38,4940

THB

Thai baht

40,205

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3614

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4549

INR

Indian rupee

65,3430

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
##### 



Exhibit 32(b) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of CheckFree Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David E. Mangum, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: November 9, 2004
    
    /s/ David E. MangumDavid E. MangumExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerCheckFree Corporation
 This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
# C_2012182EN.01000101.xml

| 22.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6249 — Princes/ARIA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 182/01

On 4 April 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6249. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6249. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 02-4891

FREDERICK BELCHER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson.

Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-01-956)

Submitted: April 17, 2003

Decided: April 23, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Benjamin T. Stepp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellant. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Frederick Belcher pleaded guilty to cocaine base possession with

intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (2000). Belcher

was sentenced to 235 months incarceration and 5 years of supervised

release. Belcher’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting three claims. 

First, Belcher asserts the district court erred in conducting his plea

colloquy. Because Belcher did not seek to withdraw his guilty plea in

the district court, we review this claim for plain error. United States

v. General, 278 F.3d 389, 393 (4th Cir. 2002). This claim is meritless.

The district court did not err in conducting Belcher’s plea colloquy.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. 

Second, Belcher asserts the district court erred in calculating his

sentence. A sentencing court’s factual determinations are reviewed

for clear error, while its legal interpretation of the sentencing guidelines is reviewed de novo. United States v. Bartley, 230 F.3d 667, 669

(4th Cir. 2000). This claim is meritless. There was no error in Belcher’s sentence. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) (2000). 

Third, Belcher asserts his trial counsel was ineffective. This claim

is meritless. The record does not reveal Belcher’s counsel was ineffective, and consequently, Belcher’s claim must be raised in a habeas

motion. United States v. Richardson, 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir.

1999); United States v. King, 119 F.3d 290, 295 (4th Cir. 1997). 

Accordingly, we affirm Belcher’s conviction and sentence. In

accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire record in this

case and find no other meritorious issues for appeal. This court

requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the

client requests such a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such

a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for

leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state

that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral

2 UNITED STATES v. BELCHER
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

in the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

UNITED STATES v. BELCHER 3
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.26 **REVISED** **Contact:**  Robert Crockett
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
StacyAnn McBain
Media Specialist
208-277-6288
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, FEB. 16, 2010 *REVISED* Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to Boise, Idaho Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why "I count!" and view messages from other road tour participants.
  (MST)
  
 For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy