alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-18-035]

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

August 3, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-608 and 731-TA-1420 (Preliminary) (Steel Racks from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations on August 6, 2018; views of the Commission are currently scheduled to be completed and filed on August 13, 2018.

5. Vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-583 and 731-TA-1381 (Final) (Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission by August 20, 2018.

6. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: July 27, 2018.

William Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-16552 Filed 7-30-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Crystal Garner, Appellant.

[736 NYS2d 217]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J.), rendered July 12, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees and attempted robbery in the first and second degrees, and sentencing her to concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years, 3 to 6 years, 3 to 6 years and 2 to 4 *315years, and judgment, same court (Carol Berkman, J., at plea; Harold Beeler, J., at sentence), rendered July 12,1999, convicting defendant of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing her to a consecutive term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal *(see, People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133, *lv denied*91 NY2d 976; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119, *lv denied*81 NY2d 884). We note that defendant’s arguments are generally similar to arguments rejected by this Court on the codefendant’s appeal *(People v Ramos,*284 AD2d 136).

Defendant’s procedural challenge to her sentencing is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find no reason to remand for resentencing based on a new presentence report. We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur — Williams, J.P., Tom, Rosenberger, Wallach and Marlow, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As AdoptedPursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

**Certification**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Logan CountyBancShares, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:           February 28, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/  Eddie Canterbury    |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Eddie  Canterbury        |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Donald Gene WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-189.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 12, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LSP-COTTAGE
GROVE L.P.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,002
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,252
<BONDS>                                        155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   267,008
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,350
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,662
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Margie THOMAS, Appellant, v. GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-88.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 21, 1967.

Donald S. Rose, Miami, for appellant.

Dean, Adams, George & Wood, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of the rule stated in Lindgren Plumbing Co. v. Doral Country Club, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 196 So.2d 242:

> * * * It was within the discretion of the jury to refuse to allow punitive damages, or to allow them in such amount as they determined proper based on the evidence, and on the law as given them in charge by the court.”

See also Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. McRoberts, 111 Fla. 278, 149 So. 631, 94 A.L.R. 376 (1933); Fisher v. City of Miami, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 57.

Affirmed.
#### WEIL-McLAIN COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. FLORIDA HEAT PUMP, INC., and Clifford A. Young, Appellee.

No. 72-491.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 20, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2012294EN.01000101.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 September 2012

2012/C 294/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2930 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4555 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79805 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,4498 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2099 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3695 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,141 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 284,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1038 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5383 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3203 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2396 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2684 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0258 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5536 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5848 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 439,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,7125 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1261 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4468 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 380,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9596 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,961 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,1400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,811 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6232 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6086 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,3480 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2930

JPY

Japanese yen

100,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4555

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79805

SEK

Swedish krona

8,4498

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2099

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3695

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,141

HUF

Hungarian forint

284,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1038

RON

Romanian leu

4,5383

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3203

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2396

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2684

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0258

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5536

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5848

KRW

South Korean won

1 439,33

ZAR

South African rand

10,7125

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1261

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4468

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 380,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9596

PHP

Philippine peso

53,961

RUB

Russian rouble

40,1400

THB

Thai baht

39,811

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6232

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6086

INR

Indian rupee

68,3480

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 15.1



August 9, 2000



The Board of Directors
United Stationers Inc.


We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of United Stationers Inc. for the registration of 8,200,000 shares of
its common stock of our report dated July 21, 2000, relating to the unaudited
condensed consolidated interim financial statements of United Stationers Inc.
which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000.
Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our reports are not part
of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within the
meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
December 15, 2011



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RED ROOF INNS, INC. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 00344

- CV V.

DONNA JOLLY AND JAME S GLICK , Appellees

____________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, DONNA JOLLY AND JAMES GLICK , signed February 24, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment that appellees, DONNA JO LLY AND JAMES GLICK , take nothing from appellant RED ROOF INNS, INC. We order appellees, DONNA JOLLY AND JAME S GLICK , jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM CONE
MILLS CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED DECEMBER 28, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                              856
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    45,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,500
<INVENTORY>                                     115,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                179,547
<PP&E>                                          459,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                  208,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  506,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           121,166
<BONDS>                                         139,656
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                      38,395
<COMMON>                                          2,620
<OTHER-SE>                                      155,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    506,646
<SALES>                                         716,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                716,853
<CGS>                                           641,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   641,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (20,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (8,001)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (9,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (9,365)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.47)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           41529
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           20664
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     433782
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          142436
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            138226
<LOANS>                                        1102128
<ALLOWANCE>                                       8619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1832582
<DEPOSITS>                                     1173989
<SHORT-TERM>                                    371321
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              12535
<LONG-TERM>                                     150537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1611
<OTHER-SE>                                      122589
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1832582
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  68099
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                31385
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  1450
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                100934
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               38323
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               58482
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            42452
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 391
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  28530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22991
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        7934
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     15057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.41
<LOANS-NON>                                       4790
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  8074
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      505
<RECOVERIES>                                       250
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 8619
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              8619
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011370EN.01000101.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/1

---

2011/C 370/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 362, 10.12.2011

OJ C 362, 10.12.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 355, 3.12.2011

OJ C 347, 26.11.2011

OJ C 340, 19.11.2011

OJ C 331, 12.11.2011

OJ C 319, 29.10.2011

OJ C 311, 22.10.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1689 

To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect to certain 

firefighters as exempt payments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2013 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect 

to certain firefighters as exempt payments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Firefighters As5 sistance Tax Clarification Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENTS BY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS WITH 

7 RESPECT TO CERTAIN FIREFIGHTERS TREAT8 ED AS EXEMPT PAYMENTS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986, payments made to— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1689 IS

1 (1) any firefighter who was injured as a result 

2 of the ambush of firefighters responding to an emer3 gency on December 24, 2012, in Webster, New 

4 York, 

5 (2) the spouse of any firefighter who died as a 

6 result of such ambush, or 

7 (3) any dependent (as defined in section 152 of 

8 such Code) of any firefighter who died as a result 

9 of such ambush, 

10 by an organization described in paragraph (1) or (2) of 

11 section 509(a) of such Code shall be treated as related 

12 to the purpose or function constituting the basis for such 

13 organization’s exemption under section 501 of such Code 

14 if such payments are made in good faith using a reason15 able and objective formula which is consistently applied. 

16 (b) APPLICATION.—Subsection (a) shall apply only to 

17 payments made on or after December 24, 2012, and be18 fore the later of— 

19 (1) January 1, 2014, or 

20 (2) the date which is 30 days after the date of 

21 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Registrant has no parent; see proxy statement for Registrant's principal
shareholders. The following are Registrant's subsidiaries which are included in
the consolidated financial statements:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                         Name of Subsidiary                           State or Other
                   (Each Owned 100% by Registrant                      Jurisdiction
                     Except as Otherwise Stated)                     of Incorporation
      ------------------------------------------------          ---------------------------
<S>                                                                  <C>
      Castle Concrete Company                                        Colorado
      Continental Catalina, Inc.*                                    Arizona
      Continental Copper, Inc.                                       Arizona
      Continental Quicksilver, Inc.                                  Idaho
      Continental Uranium, Inc.                                      Colorado
      Edens Industrial Park, Inc.                                    Illinois
      Phoenix Manufacturing, Inc.                                    Arizona
      ProSoft International, Inc.**                                  Colorado
      Transit Mix Concrete Co.                                       Colorado
      Transit Mix of Pueblo, Inc.                                    Colorado
      Williams Furnace Co.                                           Delaware

</TABLE>



   * owned by Continental Copper, Inc.

   **owned by Transit Mix Concrete Co.
#### John HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-356.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 6, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.