T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a )( 2 ). A cc o rd in g ly, ap p ellan t’ s r e que s tf oror a l a r gum e nti s de ni e d.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OH N D AV I D CASTL E, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. KEVI N A . SP EE SE ; ATTORNEY G EN ERA L O F TH E U N I TED STA TES, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 16379 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 3 2 5 - J C MLRL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da J a m e s C . M a han, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , O ’S C A N N L A I N , an dF I S H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . J ohn D a vi d C a s t l e appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt di sm i ss i ng hi s a ct i on al l egi ng cl ai m s und erthe F eder alT ortC l ai m s A ct(“ F T C A ”) and B i ve ns v. Si

x U nkno w n N

am ed A gent

s of FederalB ureau o

f N arcot i cs , 403 

# FI LED JU N 27 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16379 2 U . S . 388 ( 1971) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de n o v o ad is m is s a l u n d e rF e d e r a l R u le o f C iv il P r o c e du r e 1 2 ( b ) ( 1 ) a n d1 2 ( b ) ( 6 ) . B rady v. U

ni ted States , 2 1 1 F .3 d4 9 9 , 5 0 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ; Fi nk v. Sh edler , 192 F. 3 d9 1 1 , 9 1 3 - 1 4 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 9 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y d i sm i ssedC ast l e’ s B i ven s c l a i m a ga i ns tde f e ndant S pe e s e f orf a i l ur e t o s t a t e ac l a i m be c aus e C a s t l e f i l e d thi s a c t i on a f

t e rthe ap p lic ab le tw o - y e ars ta tu te o f lim ita tio n s e x p ir e d . See N e v . R e v . S ta t. § 1 1 .1 9 0 ( 4 ) ( e ) ; Va n Str u m v . La wn , 94 0 F . 2d 40 6, 40 8-10 (9th C i r. 19 91 ) ( pers on al i nj urys t a tut e of

l i m i t a t i ons unde rs t a t e l aw appl i e s t o B i ven s cl ai m s) . C as t l e f ai l ed to a lle g e f

a c ts to e s tab lis h ab a s is f o rto llin g o f

th e lim ita tio n s p e r io d . See N e v. R e v . S ta t. § 1 1 .2 5 0 ( lis tin g g r o u n d s f o rs ta tu to ryto llin g ) ; Sei n o v. E m p lo yers In s. C o. of N e v ada , 1 1 1 P .3 d1 1 0 7 , 1 1 1 2 ( N e v . 2 0 0 5 ) ( d is c u s s in g e q u itab le to llin g ) ; se e a ls o P es n e ll v . A rs e n a u lt , 543 F . 3d 1038, 1043 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( t ol l i ng pr ovi s i ons unde rs t a t e l aw appl yt o B i ven s cl ai m s) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d C a s t l e ’ s F T C A c l a i m f orl a c k of s ubj e c tm a tt e rj ur i s di c t i on be c aus e C a s t l e f a i l e d t o e xhaus thi s a dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e d ie s b e f

o r e f ilin g th is a c tio n . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 6 7 5 ( a ) ; B rady , 21 1 F . 3d at 502.09- 16379 3 C as t l e’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s, i ncl ud i ng tho se concerni ng the A l i en T ort S t atut e, ar e unp er suas i ve. AF F I RME D.