alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**SECTION      906 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,                2005                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    |  the                information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                of The                Amacore Group, Inc..        |

|   | /s/                Clark A.                Marcus         Clark                A. MarcusChief                Executive Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39433-39434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-2140-000]


Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: Persimmon Creek 
Wind Farm 1, LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Persimmon Creek Wind Farm 1, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is August 23, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://

[[Page 39434]]

www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20666572636f4e4c494e45735550504f525460464552430e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87c1c2d5c4c8e9ebeee9e2d4f2f7f7e8f5f3c7e1e2f5e4a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 3, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17028 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                       SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF DANIEL


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY *                                        JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
--------------------                                        -----------------------------
<S>                                                         <C> 
Daniel Measurement and Control, Inc.                                             Delaware
       Daniel Industries Canada Inc.                                               Canada

Daniel Measurement Services, Inc.                                                Delaware
       Metco Services, Ltd.                                                United Kingdom

Daniel Industries Foreign Sales Corporation                                Virgin Islands

Daniel Valve Company                                                             Delaware
       Oilfied Fabricating & Machine, Inc.                                          Texas

Bettis Corporation                                                               Delaware
       Bettis Holdings, Ltd.                                               United Kingdom
             Bettis UK Ltd.                                                United Kingdom
             Prime Actuator Control  Systems UK Ltd.                       United Kingdom
       Bettis Canada Ltd.                                                          Canada
       Bettis GmbH                                                                Germany
       Bettis France SARL                                                          France
       Dantorque A/S                                                              Denmark
       Shafer Valve Company                                                          Ohio
       Bettis Electric Actuator Corporation                                      Delaware
       Bettis Foreign Sales Corp.                                                Barbados
       Bettis Controls Pvt. Ltd. (50%)                                              India

Daniel International Ltd.                                                  United Kingdom
       Daniel Europe Ltd.                                                  United Kingdom
             Spectra-Tek International Ltd.                                United Kingdom
                  Daniel Asia Pacific Ltd.                                      Singapore
             Spectra-Tek Holdings Ltd.                                     United Kingdom
             Spectra-Tek UK Ltd.                                           United Kingdom
                  Advanced Spectra-Tek Private Ltd. (40%)                           India
</TABLE>




*Ownership at 100% unless otherwise specified.
#### Richard HYDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-57.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 17, 1968.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 8, 1968,

*77Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Jeffrey M. Cohen, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion in the trial court for relief pursuant to Rule 1.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A., w.as based upon the grounds that (1) he was indigent, and (2) he was not offered or furnished the assistance of counsel at the time of his guilty plea. An examination of the files and records before us conclusively shows that the second ground for relief is false. We therefore affirm this appeal from the order denying relief.

We note also that this appeal is subject to dismissal pursuant to the rule set forth in Frappied v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 502, that relief under Criminal Rule One (now Rule 1.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure) would not be available to an appellant not in custody under sentence of the lower court. But since that point was not presented in the State’s brief, we do not act upon it.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,634
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,310,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       339,173
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,628,915)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,634
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               970,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (983,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (983,340)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (498,339)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,481,697)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
262 La. 1101

#### Audrey Stout WILDER v. Robert E. WILDER.

No. 52686.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1972.

In re: Robert E. Wilder applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 263 So.2d 730.

Application denied; the judgment complained of is not final.
**Exhibit10.1**

 

 

AMENDMENTNO. 1 TO

THECOURIER CORPORATION EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) iseffective as of the date of approval by the Compensation Committee of the Boardof Directors of Courier Corporation and amends that certain Courier CorporationExecutive Compensation Program (the “Program”), as amended and restated onDecember 5, 2005.  Capitalized terms usedherein and not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in theProgram.  All other provisions of theProgram shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby.

 

The Program is hereby amended by replacingthe references to “the January 31 of the new fiscal year” in the Sectionsentitled “Annual Cash Incentive” and “Long Term Stock Incentive” by the phrase“two and a half months into the new fiscal year.”

 

Approved and adopted by the CompensationCommittee of the Board of Directors of Courier Corporation on September 18,2007

 

 

----
# C_2012081EN.01000201.xml

| 20.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 March 2012

2012/C 81/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3150 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,73 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4356 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82845 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8770 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2067 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5505 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,533 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 289,44 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6968 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1255 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3788 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3801 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2452 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3037 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2086 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5967 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6549 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 476,89 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9593 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3092 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5307 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 998,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0147 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,417 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,4562 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,410 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3796 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6825 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,0330 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3150

JPY

Japanese yen

109,73

DKK

Danish krone

7,4356

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82845

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8770

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2067

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5505

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,533

HUF

Hungarian forint

289,44

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6968

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1255

RON

Romanian leu

4,3788

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3801

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2452

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3037

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2086

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5967

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6549

KRW

South Korean won

1 476,89

ZAR

South African rand

9,9593

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3092

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5307

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 998,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0147

PHP

Philippine peso

56,417

RUB

Russian rouble

38,4562

THB

Thai baht

40,410

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3796

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6825

INR

Indian rupee

66,0330

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
          United States:  First Quarter 1996             
                                                        
(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)
                                                                     
                                    First Quarter 1996              
                                                                   
                                                 Standard    Percent
          Type                                   error on    Distri-
                                    Estimate     estimate     bution
                                                                   
All housing units.................   113,258         239        100
                                                                  
  Occupied........................   100,472         246         89
    Owner occupied................    65,453         240         58
    Renter occupied...............    35,019         198         31
                                                                   
  Vacant..........................    12,786         128         11
    Year-round vacant.............     9,656         113          9
      For rent....................     3,026          64          3
      For sale only...............     1,066          38          1
      Rented or sold,                                              
      awaiting occupancy..........       723          32          1
      Held off market.............     4,841          81          4
        For occasional use........     1,604          47          1
        Temporarily occupied                                       
        by persons with                                            
        usual residence elsewhere.       853          34          1
        For other reasons.........     2,384          57          2
                                                                   
    Seasonal vacant...............     3,130          65          3
   
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00117-CV

IN RE GERMANIA SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Proceeding

From the 12th District Court

Madison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21-17080

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Germania Select Insurance Company’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” 

is denied. Relator’s “Motion for Emergency Stay” is dismissed as moot.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed May 18, 2022

[OT06]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

366 

CAF 12-01784 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER G. SALO, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATRICIA A. SALO, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

PAUL M. DEEP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Joan E.

Shkane, J.), entered July 30, 2012 in proceedings pursuant to Family

Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petitions for lack of

jurisdiction. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner filed two petitions alleging violations

of a prior custody order, and a modification petition based on a

change in circumstances. Petitioner appeals from an order in which

Family Court dismissed the petitions for lack of jurisdiction because

a divorce action was pending in Supreme Court. We dismiss the appeal

as moot because, while the appeal was pending, the parties and the

Attorney for the Child entered into a stipulation modifying their

custody and visitation arrangement “in full satisfaction of all

petitions.” Upon consent of the parties, the court awarded petitioner

primary physical custody, with visitation to respondent, and ordered

that “all prior orders are hereby vacated.” Thus, “because the

stipulation resulted in a new order that super[s]eded the order being

appealed, this appeal is moot” (Matter of Mace v Miller, 93 AD3d 1086,

1086; see Matter of Justeen T., 17 AD3d 1148, 1148).

Entered: March 28, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 10.54

COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION        RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

This Restricted Stock Agreement ("Agreement"), made as of[Grant Date](the "Grant Date"),
between COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and[Employee Name](the "Award Holder").

In
accordance with the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan of Countrywide Financial Corporation (Amended and Restated Effective June 16, 2004), as further amended (the "EIP"), the Company
has awarded the Award Holder[Shares]shares of common stock, par value $0.05 per share ("Shares"), upon the terms and
conditions described in this Agreement and the EIP (the "Restricted Stock"). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the EIP.

Grant of Restricted Stock.This Agreement evidences the Company's grant to the Award Holder, on the
Grant Date of the Restricted Stock, subject to the provisions of this Agreement and the EIP (the "Award"). The number of shares of Restricted Stock shall be subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 5 hereof. The Restricted Stock will be maintained on deposit with the Company or its agent.

Cumulative Total of
Restricted Shares Released

Release Dates33%

[One Year from Grant Date]66%

[Two Years from Grant Date]100%

[Three Years from Grant Date]




---







---





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be executed in its name and on its behalf, all as of the Grant Date and the
Participant hereby executes and acknowledges acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

|Countrywide Financial Corporation:             |  | [Employee Name]:
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|/s/ Becky BaileyBecky Bailey                   |  |                 
|MD, Global Benefits and Executive Compensation |  | Date:           

---



QuickLinks
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 0621

_____________________________ S TEFAN P HILLIP G ISLASON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John F. Simon, Jr. , Judge

. June 27, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jason Cromey of Cromey Law, P.A., Pensacola
, for Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.
Reader’s Guide for Chlorfenapyr 

CRM: Susan Bartow 

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Chlorfenapyr Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0467 

Publication Date: December 8, 2010 

The Agency is providing the “Readers Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and 

navigate the various entries contained in the chlorfenapyr docket. 

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents: 

Docket Item 1. Reader’s Guide to the Chlorfenapyr Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0467. 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division Document 

Docket Item 2. Chlorfenapyr Final Work Plan (FWP) for Registration Review. December 

8, 2010. 

Human Health Document 

Docket Item 3. Chlorfenapyr. Public Comments Regarding the Health Effects Division’s 

(HED’s) Human-Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support of 

Registration Review of 26-MAY-2010. HED’s Response to Public 

Comments. November 4, 2010. 

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents 

Docket Item 4. Registration Review – Problem Formulation Revised Based on Public 

Comments for Ecological Risk, Environmental Fate, and Endangered 

Species Assessments for Chlorfenapyr. October 28, 2010.

Docket Item 5. Response to Comments on the Preliminary Problem Formulation for 

Chlorfenapyr. October 28, 2010.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Otis J. WRIGHT, Respondent.

No. 44074.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 279 So.2d 70.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### KILOW, INC., individually, Appellant, v. JACKSONVILLE NATIONAL BANK, a national banking corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-340.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 3, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.