alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marlin C. TOWNSEND and wife, Marilyn H. Townsend, Appellants, v. MARTIN-McCLELLAN COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. Q-412.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 21, 1972.

G. Robert Barron, of Smith, Tolton, ■ Grimsley & Barron, Fort Walton Beach, for appellants.

F. B. Estergren, of Estergren, Fleet, Fortune & Anchors, Fort Walton Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. F.S. Section 725.01, F.S.A. 1; Miller v. Murray (Fla.1954) 68 So.2d 594; Chaney v. Brown (1947) 158 Fla. 489, 29 So.2d 209; Connolly v. Sebeco (Fla.1956) 89 So.2d 482.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
# C_2012020EN.01000501.xml

| 25.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 January 2012

2012/C 20/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3003 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,89 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4352 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83460 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7940 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2065 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6390 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,422 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 302,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6977 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2984 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3430 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3767 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2429 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3164 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0912 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6092 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6527 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 472,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3843 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2062 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5685 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 706,35 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0147 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,125 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,1911 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,920 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2923 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1965 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,1520 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3003

JPY

Japanese yen

100,89

DKK

Danish krone

7,4352

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83460

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7940

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2065

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6390

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,422

HUF

Hungarian forint

302,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6977

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2984

RON

Romanian leu

4,3430

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3767

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2429

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3164

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0912

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6092

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6527

KRW

South Korean won

1 472,98

ZAR

South African rand

10,3843

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2062

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5685

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 706,35

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0147

PHP

Philippine peso

56,125

RUB

Russian rouble

40,1911

THB

Thai baht

40,920

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2923

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1965

INR

Indian rupee

65,1520

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 23








Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
SMTEK International, Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-02969 and 333-31349) on Form S-3 of SMTEK International, Inc. and
the registration statements (Nos. 333-74400, 333-08689, 333-72139, 333-44612,
333-49954 and 333-49956) on Form S-8 of our report dated August 16, 2002,
except for the third paragraph of note 5 to the consolidated financial
statements which is as of September 25, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of SMTEK International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30,
2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash
flows and stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) for each of the
years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2002, which report appears in
the June 30, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of SMTEK International, Inc.

Los Angeles, California
September 25, 2002



Page
#### Mack TILLMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 71-1296, 72-569 and 72-595.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 11, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line Project Committee will be held Tuesday, September 11, 2018, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information please contact Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

The committee will be discussing Toll-free issues and public input is welcomed.

Dated: August 1, 2018.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2018-17003 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### James W. COCHRAN, Appellant, v. Pearl L. COCHRAN, Appellee.

No. 72-691.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 30, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Thomas E. Kirkland, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### William E. KLEIN, Appellant, v. Erica KLEIN, Appellee.

No. 73-550.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT (11.2)


<TABLE>
CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE--BASIC
FISCAL YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 5, 2000, FEBRUARY 6, 1999
AND FEBRUARY 5, 1998 (in thousands except per share amounts)
<CAPTION>
                                 1999        1998        1997
                              ---------   ---------   ---------
<S>                           <C>         <C>         <C>
Common shares outstanding
 at beginning of
 fiscal period                  17,730      17,499      17,239

Shares issued during
 the period -
 weighted average                   50         144         166

Less:  Treasury stock -
 weighted average               (8,111)     (7,708)    (5,758)
                              ---------   ---------   ---------
Weighted average number
 of common and common
 equivalent shares               9,669       9,935      11,647
                              =========   =========   =========
Net earnings (loss)
 applicable to common shares:
  From continuing
   operations                $  3,197    $ 21,276    $ 13,286
  From discontinued
   operations                  (6,429)        668        (573)
                             ---------   ---------   ---------
      Net earnings (loss)    $ (3,232)   $ 21,944    $ 12,713
                             ---------   ---------   ---------
Earnings (loss) per common
 share:
  From continuing
   operations                $   0.33    $   2.14    $   1.14
  From discontinued
   operations                   (0.66)       0.07       (0.05)
                             ---------   ---------   ---------
     Net earnings (loss)     $  (0.33)   $   2.21    $   1.09
                             =========   =========   =========
</TABLE>
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.19 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, FEB. 8, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to Maryland http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  https://www.census.gov/rdo http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         167,789                          
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               385,492
<PP&E>                                       8,380,418
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,448,101)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,317,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,054
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,317,809
<SALES>                                        605,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               607,783
<CGS>                                          543,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  543,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,737)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7322** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. DAVID ANTHONY WIGGINS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr - 00449

- RDB

- 1 )

Submitted : February 16, 2017 Decided: February 21, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN , Circui t Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. David Anthony Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Anthony Wiggins appeals the district court’s order remanding his state criminal prosecution to state court. We affirm. In certain circumstances, a state criminal prosecution may be rem oved to federal district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (2012). Such removal is improper absent “a showing that the defendant is being denied rights guaranteed under a federal law providing for specific civil rights stated in terms of racial equality.” South Carolina v. Moore , 447 F.2d 1067, 1070 (4th Cir. 1971) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Georgia v. Rachel , 384 U.S. 780, 792 (1966). “If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (20 12 ). We have reviewed the r ecord and conclude that Wiggins has not made the requisite showing for removal under § 1443. Thus, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the removed prosecution and appropriately remanded the case to state court. Accordingly, althoug h we grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the de cisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 30, 2014

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D13- 610

Lower Tribunal No. 11-38180

________________



### Jennifer Papa, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.



### Purebred Breeders, LLC, etc., et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer Eig,

Judge.

Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC, and Theodore J. Leopold and Diana

L. Martin (Palm Beach Gardens), for appellants.

Akerman, LLP, and Christopher S. Carver and Erika R. Shuminer, for

appellees.

Before WELLS, SALTER and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Jennifer Papa, et al., Plaintiffs below, appeal from an “Amended Final

Judgment of Dismissal” without prejudice. Appellants claim that no judgment

should have been entered, and that the action should, instead, have been dismissed

without prejudice.

Because we agree that the trial court intended to allow Plaintiffs to refile in

the county court and that a final judgment “without prejudice” is, in effect, not a

final judgment, we reverse and remand for entry of a dismissal of the action

without prejudice.

Reversed and remanded with instructions consistent herein.

2
#### Larry Cornelius PRYOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-404.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1


August 15, 2000


DOT HILL SYSTEMS CORP.
6305 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, California  92009


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         You have requested our opinion with respect to certain matters in
connection with the filing by DOT HILL SYSTEMS CORP. (the "Company") of a
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") with the
Securities and Exchange Commission covering the offering of up to 500,000 shares
of the Company's Common Stock, $0.01 par value (the "Shares"), pursuant to the
Company's 2000 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan (the "Plan").

         In connection with this opinion, we have examined the Registration
Statement and the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, as amended,
and such other documents, records, certificates, memoranda and other instruments
as we deem necessary as a basis for this opinion. We have assumed the
genuineness and authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the
conformity to originals of all documents submitted to us as copies thereof, and
the due execution and delivery of all documents where due execution and delivery
are a prerequisite to the effectiveness thereof. Our opinion is limited to the
effect of the Business Corporation Law of the State of New York as in effect on
the date hereof. Accordingly, we express no opinion with respect to the effect
of any other laws.

         On the basis of the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, we are of the
opinion that the Shares, when sold and issued in accordance with the Plan and
the Registration Statement, will be validly issued, fully paid, and
nonassessable (except as shares of the Shares issued pursuant to certain
deferred payment arrangements, which will be fully paid and nonassessable when
such deferred payments are made in full).

         Except as set forth in the preceding sentence, this opinion may not be
relied upon by any other person, or used by you for any other purposes, without
our prior written consent. We consent to the filing of this opinion as an
exhibit to the Registration Statement.

Very truly yours,

COOLEY GODWARD LLP

/s/ HARRY RUBIN
--------------------------
Harry Rubin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          21,752
<SECURITIES>                                    17,304
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,362
<PP&E>                                           5,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,177)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,894
<OTHER-SE>                                    (41,555)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,417
<SALES>                                          7,177
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,581
<CGS>                                            5,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,375
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,405)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.98)


</TABLE>
No. 00-7196.

#### Ray *v.*Wetherington, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 24
             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                              
                              
                              
We   consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in
the registration  statement of Continental Materials
Corporation  and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 33-
23671) of our report  dated March  14,  1996  on  our
audits of the  consolidated  financial statements   and
financial  statement  schedule  of  Continental Materials
Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December  30,  1995 and
December  31, 1994, and for the three years  in  the  period
ended  December  30,  1995, which reports are  included  in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                     COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 1996
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

I, Scott M. Carson, Chief Financial Officer of Eye Care International, Inc.
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
         2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
       all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
       of Eye Care International, Inc.

Dated: November 22, 2004

                                                  /S/ SCOTT M. CARSON
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Scott M. Carson
                                                  Chief Financial Officer