alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Midwest Express Holdings, Inc., a
Wisconsin corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


/s/ Timothy E. Hoeksema
----------------------------------------
Timothy E. Hoeksema
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert S. Bahlman
----------------------------------------
Robert S. Bahlman
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2003



          A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.
          Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
          the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
          its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard P. Dutkiewicz, as Chief Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          the Quarterly Report ofthe Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 4, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ RICHARD P. DUTKIEWICZ    |
|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|               |   |   |   | Richard P. Dutkiewicz        |
|               |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
|               |   |   |   | Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
JllM^ l^,^l ' 

Noyac Helicopter Noise Issues 

To: PO-f^ l^^a^ T OP^^^^'^^ ^ A'^ O ^oi o a 3. ^ 

Reference Docket Number FAA 2010 0302: 

Dear: S r R 

Thank you for your interest and support to mitigate helicopter traffic noise over eastern 

Long Island. However, the proposed FAA rules as stated do not adequately address the 

issues related to the towns of Southampton and East Hampton. 

It is my understanding that, under the proposed regulations, helicopters using the 

NORTHERN route over Long Island Soimd would still be able veer off to reach East 

Hampton airport and pass over populated areas such as Noyac and North Sea. Although 

the proposed 2500 feet limitation is a step in the right direction, helicopters do not attain 

this altitude for several miles from the airport Thus, the noise and safety issues in Noyac 

and North Sea are still serious concerns. 

Helicopters using the NORTHERN route should be REQUIRED to stay over water xmtil 

Orient Point and then travel over Gardiners Bay and Barcelona Neck directly into the 

airport They should also be reqxiired to follow the same route on return trips to New 

York. 

The land areas near this over water route - Barcelona Neck in East Hampton and 

Mashomack preserve on Shelter Island - are essentially unpopulated. 

In addition to the above, there should be a more equal distribution of trafBc between the 

NORTHERN (Long Island Sound) and SOUTHERN (ocean) routes. 

Please consider these comments'as part of the public conunent on the proposed 

regulations FAA 2010 0302. 

Thank you. 

Sincerel 

CMA^i-^ll ^ (/ir)t(2.<><^ ./u<fT~
#### Robert D. HAYS, Appellant, v. Ruia C. HAYS, Appellee.

No. 71-392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 29, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 7, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50680 Summary Calendar

JOSEPH M. MEDRANO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JO ANN BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. 5:04-CV-75)

_________________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Joseph M. Medrano appeals the denial by the district court of his request for attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). We affirm for these reasons:

### 1. Because there was extensive evidence in the record supporting both sides of

the dispute and the evidence did not conclusively weigh in favor of either side, the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the government’s position was substantially justified. Pierce v. Underwood , 487 U.S. 552, 565, 108 S.Ct. 2541, 2550, 101 L.Ed.2d 490 (1988) (the position of the government will be deemed to be substantially justified “if there is a ‘genuine dispute’ ... or ‘if reasonable people could differ as to [the appropriateness of the contested action]’”).
2. The fact that the district court ultimately remanded the case back to the agency to further develop the factual record does not lead to a finding of no substantial justification. Id. at 566 n.2 (stating that “a position can be justified even though it is not correct”).
AFFIRMED.
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Third Quarter:  2004 and 2005

                                          
                      Third    Third    90-percent confidence
Age of householder   Quarter  Quarter      interval  (&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>
                       2004     2005   of 2005 rate  of difference

United States.....      69.0     68.8      0.5           0.4

  Under 25 years..      25.4     27.0      1.5           1.4
  25 to 29 years..      39.9     40.7      1.5           1.4
  30 to 34 years..      57.7     56.1      1.4           1.3
  35 to 39 years..      65.4     65.8      1.3           1.2
  40 to 44 years..      71.5     71.1      1.2           1.1
  45 to 49 years..      75.7     74.7      1.1           1.2
  50 to 54 years..      79.4     78.9      1.1           1.2
  55 to 59 years..      80.7     80.4      0.8           0.9
  60 to 64 years..      81.8     81.6      0.9           1.0
  65 to 69 years..      84.0     83.4      1.4           1.2
  70 to 74 years..      84.5     82.5      1.5           1.3
  75 years and over..   79.5     78.4      1.1           1.0

    Under 35 years..    43.1     43.0      0.9           0.8
    35 to 44 years..    68.6     68.6      0.9           0.8
    45 to 54 years..    77.4     76.7      0.8           0.8
    55 to 64 years..    81.2     80.9      0.6           0.6
    65 years and over.. 81.8     80.6      0.8           0.7
aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliablilty.  The larger the confidence interval is,
in relation to the size of the estimate, the less reliable the estimate.
#### Thomas CASEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-773.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 30, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2012030EN.01000301.xml

| 3.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/3

---

Calls for proposals under the work programme for 2012 of the Information and Communication Technologies Policy Support Programme as part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013)

2012/C 30/03

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the call for proposals under the work programme for 2012 of the Information and Communication Technologies Policy Support Programme (ICT PSP) as part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call: CIP-ICT PSP-2012-6.

Call documentation including content, deadline and budget is given in the call texts which are published on the ICT PSP website:

http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/ict_psp/participating/calls/index_en.htm

---
# C_2011297EN.01000101.xml

| 8.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6315 — Hochtief/Geosea/Beluga Hochtief Offshore JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 297/01

On 30 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6315. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6315. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of World Air Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.


                                                         /s/ Gilberto M. Duarte
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr.
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                     of World Air Holdings, Inc.

August 15, 2005
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate [dentifier: 2010-N1\tl-071-AD Costs: Labor per airplane (up to 6 work hours x S85/hour) Parts per airplane Cost per airplane Number ofU.S.-rcgistered airplanes Total fleet cost Executive Order 12866: Could the AD beconsidered a "significant regulatory action"? DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? $ 510 $ +

## ---.2 $ 126 x

### -.fil upto

## $M12Q

YES () explain NO (X)

YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have asignificant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might bethe only mode of transportation? YES ( )explain NO (X)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Con-way Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas W. Stotlar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 27, 2008



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Douglas W. Stotlar
|Name:                  |  | Douglas W. Stotlar     
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
Joseph D. Barbera 

14706 NE Erickson Dr. 

La Center, WA 98629 

Tel: 360 263 5359 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings 

Washington, DC 

In the Matter of: Joseph D. Barbera 

FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 

FDMS No. FAA 2013-1083 

Judge Richard Goodwin 

RECEIVED 

OCT 2 8 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

Response to Order Entering Default Judgement (dated 15 Oct 2014) 

Requesting basis for decision, and offering evidence of timely submittal 

In the Show Cause Order dated 9 September, 2014, I was instructed to respond to all 

pleading on or before 1 October. To the best of my knowledge I complied with that 

order fully. The wording in the Order Entering Judgment states that I failed to do so. 

Please provide the basis for that decision. 

a) Was the response by certified mail received on the due date is not early enough? 

( .. for example a few days are required for the documents to enter the 

system ... ) 

b) Or was it that the documents were deemed inadequate or defective, not in the 

right form, etc.? 

The following USPS tracking numbers will show that the documents were received on or 

before 1 October. 

Tracking info via www.usps.cOIJ1 

7012 1640 0001 4343 3843 

7012 1640 0001 4343 3850 

7012 1640 0001 4343 3867 

Respec···.tf. ·.i·f·u.r.su?b~rJ ed, 25 September, 2014 

' I ?/ I 

/.1 '! /1// 

1;/(Jc> 

1 
Service list 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Ave. SW 

Washington D.C. 20591 

David Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave., SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

2
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.94 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to Florida **What:**
Today, the Census Bureau shipped local 2010 Census data to the governor and leadership of the state legislature in Florida. After confirmation of receipt, usually within 24 hours of shipment, the Census Bureau will issue a news release with five custom tables of data for the state. Thursday's release is expected around 2 p.m. EDT. At that time, the full set of data will be available via FTP download at http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/. Within 24 hours after release, the data will be posted on the Census Bureau's new American FactFinder site http://factfinder2.census.gov. The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011. **For More Information:**
For more information on the Census Bureau's Redistricting Data Program, visit https://www.census.gov/rdo and http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html. Please visit http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/ for an interactive map showcasing county-level population change from 1960 to 2010, as well as state-level data on race and Hispanic or Latino origin for 2010. The widget will be updated as states are released and can be embedded on your website. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2012088EN.01000301.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6452 — Nomura/HLV/DLP/DLA/DLL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 88/02

On 16 March 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6452. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6452. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  First Quarter 2000 and 1999

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                    First     First    Standard
                                   quarter   quarter   error on  Standard     2000
Type                                 2000      1999      2000    error on   Percent
                                   estimate  estimate  estimate difference  of total

All housing units.................  119,105   118,445       234        331       100

  Occupied........................  105,293   104,461       244        346        88
    Owner occupied................   70,701    69,638       243        344        59
    Renter occupied...............   34,592    34,823       197        279        29

  Vacant..........................   13,812    13,984       133        189        12
    Year-round vacant.............   10,306    10,897       116        166         9
      For rent....................    2,989     3,132        64         91         3
      For sale only...............    1,161     1,296        40         58         1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy..........      748       835        32         47         1
      Held off market.............    5,408     5,634        85        122         5
        For occasional use........    1,858     1,955        51         72         2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence elsewhere.      985       933        37         51         1
        For other reasons.........    2,565     2,746        59         85         2

    Seasonal vacant...............    3,506     3,087        69         95         3