alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              17
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      743
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1155
<PP&E>                                           10873
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1644
<BONDS>                                           7000
<COMMON>                                            40
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             7500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6211
<SALES>                                           2554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2554
<CGS>                                             1513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1049)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       175
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1224)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1539)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.04)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Public Service Company of New
Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we,
Cheryl W. Grise, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and John H.
Forsgren, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

/s/ Cheryl W. Grise
    (Signature)
    Cheryl W. Grise
    Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and
will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011351EN.01001601.xml

| 2.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/16

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,25 % on 1 December 2011

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 December 2011

2011/C 351/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3492 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 104,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4330 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1258 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2264 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7830 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,279 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 302,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6975 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5050 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3550 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4718 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3182 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3736 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4868 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7347 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7312 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 518,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9350 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5890 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5085 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 136,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2087 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,391 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,4650 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,636 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4189 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3008 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,3080 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3492

JPY

Japanese yen

104,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4330

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85910

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1258

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2264

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7830

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,279

HUF

Hungarian forint

302,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6975

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5050

RON

Romanian leu

4,3550

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4718

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3182

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3736

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4868

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7347

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7312

KRW

South Korean won

1 518,01

ZAR

South African rand

10,9350

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5890

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5085

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 136,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2087

PHP

Philippine peso

58,391

RUB

Russian rouble

41,4650

THB

Thai baht

41,636

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4189

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3008

INR

Indian rupee

69,3080

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
#### Simon Willie JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
1200 Rue Des Etoiles – Carencro, LA 70520    (337) 896‐2880

02‐03‐11

Bureau of Ocean Energy, Management, Regulation and Enforcement  

Director Michael R. Bromwich  

1849 C Street, N. W. Washington, D.C. 20240 

Email Letters to: Thomas Lillie, Chief of Staff, Thomas.Lillie@boemre.gov 

Copy: Lori LeBlanc, GEST, lori@lorileblancllc.com

Gentlemen, 

     The Interim Final Safety Rule’s “should” to “must” issue is a critical one. We at Energy Solutions

Technology, LLC are aligned with and support the efforts of Louisiana DNR Secretary Scott Angelle and

the Back to Work Coalition to work with you on a swiftly adopting a solution.  

     The change from “should” to “must” for documents incorporated by reference is unnecessarily

burdensome to operators and results in some cases of increased safety risk and some cases where

compliance is impossible.

The purpose of the Interim Final Rule is to improve drilling safety – and we believe that the compromise

proposed by the Coalition does this – it sharpens the focus of the rule to drilling safety and the specific

areas of concern that were the cause for the rule.  

      We are not aware of any added safety benefit to be gained from revising the language from “should”

to “must” in over 14,000 provisions; and we are actually aware of several instances where safety would

be compromised or compliance would be impossible. We urge you to consider the solution put forth by

the Back to Work Coalition so that we can safely return to work in the Gulf.  

     It is past‐due‐time for skilled workers in the oil and gas industry to return to work in the Gulf of

Mexico and get this country and this industry moving again.

Regards,

Maurice Breaux

Energy Solutions Technology
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             318
<SECURITIES>                                     6,216
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                       444
<INVENTORY>                                      6,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,863
<PP&E>                                           4,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                     190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,630
<BONDS>                                          2,579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,162
<SALES>                                            956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,175
<CGS>                                            1,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,105)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (72)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (772)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
**United States Environmental Protection Agency**

**Docket Index for**  **Final Rulemaking**  **EPA**

**- R09** 

**- OAR** 

**- 20**  **1 6** 

- **0119**

**Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Modoc County Air Pollution Control District,**  **Permit Programs**

Note: Copies of t he Federal Register (FR) notices listed in Section D are included in the docket only if they are pre

- 1994 FR notices. FR notices dated from 1994 to the present are publicly accessible
at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FR

.

**Docket Index**  **Number Document**  **Date**

1 June 2016 Docket Index for Direct Final Proposal/Approval Rulemaking; Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Modoc County Air Pollution Control District, Permit Programs June 2016

**Section A**

**- SIP Submittal Documents**  A.1 1990 Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan Submission 1 2/31/1990

A.2 SIP Submittal Completeness Determination

– David P. Howekamp, EPA Region 9 to William W. Sylte, CARB 2/28/1991

A.3 Supplemental Information to the Modoc County State Implementation Plan 10 /2 4/1988

**Section B**

**– Copies of Submitted Rules and Statutes**  B.1 Submitted Rule 2.3 Adopted and effective dates vary; see text of documents for B.2 Submitted Rule 2.5 B.3 Submitted Rule 2.7 B.4 Submitted Rule 2.10 **Section C**

**– Supporting Material and Other Documents**  C.1 EPA’s Technical Support Document for Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Modoc County Air Pollution Control District, Permit Programs June 2016

C. 2 Existing SIP

- Approved Rule 2.3 Adopted and effective dates vary; see text of documents for dates C.13 Existing SIP

- Approved Rule 2.5 C.14 Existing SIP

- Approved Rule 2.7 C.15 Existing SIP

- Approved Rule 2.9

**Section D**

**– Referenced Federal Register Notices**  D.1 37 FR 19812

– Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans

– Miscellaneous Amendments 9 /22/1972
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Third Quarter 2000 and 1999

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     Third quarter 2000
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.8        8.1       11.6
      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.0
      For sale only.......................       1.0        0.8        1.5
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.9        0.9        0.8
      Held off market.....................       4.4        3.7        7.2
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        2.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        1.0
        For other reasons.................       2.0        1.6        3.3

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.8        1.6        7.5

    Occupied..............................      88.3       90.3       81.0



                                                     Third quarter 1999
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       9.2        8.4       12.3
      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.4
      For sale only.......................       0.9        0.8        1.4
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.9        0.9        0.9
      Held off market.....................       4.7        3.9        7.6
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        3.3
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.2        1.9        3.6

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.8        6.8

    Occupied..............................      87.9       90.0       80.9
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:National Consumers League (NCL) - Report September 23, 2013
- 20-· 

OUlm BO. 111. 

137Tlrtue of the authorU7 coata111&4. ill 8 •• t10». >+ of 

the Aot ot "e1"."u.&17 14, 1,0,. e.,a1>l$l11_ tU :Oepar-.' 01 

OollllHrC8 (,2 a's.t. ,26. , U.S. o. bOI). I. t 11 lalreby orCitJ'ettba t 

the authority ucl ftmotloas "ala tl-. to the 0011e.t10a8&d o~U&'lttn of for • ., t"~ .1I:&$1$ti,. atw eX$I'".le.4 \ly the 

J1vitd.on of J'o:r.l&a~raa.. 'ta,l.tlol _4 the SeotlQa o.t Jlllshm. 

$t!ll.t 1.tlt WI at •• v l'oJik 0'1'1. of the JlU"eau of 'ore11!J11. aadDcuultlo 

(Jommer", b" traneten_ trOll the JV$R ot :rorel~ QAPo ••• tlc 

CO._8roe to the Bureau. ot the O.au,. . 

it S8 furth ••• rl~ tket the p.r8ou..l.etul~at, Bn.11 

cvrent 8to. ot~11.$ ut1111.1 bl tho. Iva .. rtt :rore~ _, »o ••• tle Oouu. 1a·~tDa tut tb.l. fIm.'tQJl$$hel.l 'be 

treiasterred to the Bu?.eau •. f the C._'. _ the ..,ol.t84 fDAI 

app1"o:p1"taki or &11.oat84 '10%'U89 u_nri., OU..tthc!is8 taaotlenl 

t01: tb.t18oli~1,e. 1,941. t*hall. be a110t,e410J' U;p1Jl4UUN 'b7 the 

Jureau efthe QeAS'I1I~ •• ,.~.o:tUdl. eqQj;pm.'. u.iluppU.es '0 be 

Wdttene4; aadtht f.at to bfll allo'li".'.thal1 'be '.ilentiae4 by 

~ 10_1" .. (It)1'111Itlag ()f the ~1n!'s'l"atS:". Asd.lllunt'c the 

Secretary, the Dtrector' otthe Jveau of for.~ u4 DomeBtl-a Ooaert., 

amd the ral"ect&1" ot the 0........11.' '0 the appro'fal of ~ 

lecreta17 o.f OO~"fII. 

the proTttl<.ntt .r thll()rder 8Mll be et1.,t.\v •• ,. 1, 1941.
No. 11051.

#### The Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. et al. *v.*Spaulding.

Decided October 19, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Butler county.

*Mr. Charles Darlington*and *Mr. Charles L. Darlington,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Culla J. Smith*and *Messrs. Andrews, Harlan & Andrezvs,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Spear, Sitauck and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2012125EN.01000401.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/4

---

Special Report No 3/2012 ‘Did the Commission successfully deal with deficiencies identified in the Member States’ management and control systems?’

2012/C 125/04

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 3/2012 ‘Did the Commission successfully deal with deficiencies identified in the Member States' management and control systems?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 11.1
                        IRIDIUM WORLD COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

                  COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER CLASS A COMMON SHARES
                        (In Thousands Except Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                  -----------------------------------------------
                                                                           1998                     1999
                                                                  ----------------------   ----------------------

<S>                                                               <C>                      <C>
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO CLASS A COMMON SHARES:

Net loss                                                            $            17,426      $            60,399

Incremental equity loss pick-up upon assumed exercise of
    options, warrants and conversion of Class B Common Shares                     1,789                    4,092
                                                                  ----------------------   ----------------------

Net loss applicable to Class A Common shares                        $            19,215      $            64,491
                                                                  ======================   ======================

AVERAGE NUMBER OF CLASS A SHARES:

Average number of Class A Common shares outstanding                          12,008,654               17,541,493

Diluted adjustments (2):
    Assumed exercise of options and warrants                                  1,369,630                1,362,272
                                                                  ----------------------   ----------------------

Average number of Class A Common shares assumed to be
    outstanding, assuming dilution                                           13,378,284               18,903,765
                                                                  ======================   ======================

NET LOSS PER CLASS A COMMON SHARE:

Basic (1)                                                           $              1.45      $              3.44

Diluted (2)                                                         $              1.44      $              3.41
</TABLE>


(1) The assumed exercise of options and warrants and coversion of Class B Common
    Shares in periods of net loss are anti-dilutive and are not included in the
    computation and presentation of loss per Class A Common share.

(2) The assumed exercise of options and warrants are anti-dilutive but are
    included in the calculation of diluted loss per Class A Common share in
    accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 601 (a) (11).
#### John HARRIS v. PATENT SCAFFOLDING CO. et al.

No. 9315.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

April 24, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 31, 1973.

A. G. Seale and Ken Barnette, Seale, Smith, Phelps, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellants Pacific Signal Ins. Co. and Sky Climbers, Inc.

John I. Moore and Wm. L. Wilson, Taylor, Porter, Brooks & Phillips, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellees Travelers Ins. Co., Patent Scaffolding, and others.

H. Alva Brumfield, Jr. and H. Alva Brumfield, III, Baton Rouge, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before LOTTINGER, ELLIS, and CRAIN, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge:

This case, which is consolidated with cases Nos. 9313, 9314, 9316, and 9317, in*487volves the identical parties and issues as does Harris v. Patent Scaffolding Company et al., 277 So.2d 483 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1973), this day decided.

For reasons therein assigned, the judgment herein is affirmed, at appellants’ cost.

Affirmed.
#### Billy HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-195.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 29, 1972.

Ordered, that this appeal, is quashed as frivolous. Miles v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 101. Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Appeal quashed.