alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
261 La. 313

#### Albert V. RICH et al. v. Wade O. MARTIN, Jr., et al.

No. 51978.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1971.

In re: Albert V. Rich, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 259 So.2d 113.

Writ denied. Relator has favorable mandamus judgments in both courts ordering his name to be placed on the ballot at the State General Election in February, 1972. He complains only that we should review the court of appeal judgment so that it may become executory. The relator is fully protected under R.S. 18:631, R.S. 18:-362. See last sentence.
# Introduction

# Subsectors

# Appendix A

# Appendix B

# Appendix C
Exhibit 21.1  CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.  SUBSIDIARIES  1.Consolidated Edison Company of
New York, Inc .(Con Edison of New York), a New York corporation, all of
the common stock of which is owned by Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con
Edison).  2.Orange and Rockland
Utilities, Inc.(O&R), a New York corporation, wholly-owned by Con
Edison, and O&Rs subsidiaries: Rockland Electric Company, a New Jersey
corporation, and Pike County Light & Power Company, a Pennsylvania
corporation, each of which is wholly-owned by O&R.  Neither Con Edison, Con
Edison of New York nor O&R have any significant subsidiaries other than as
indicated above. Pursuant to Item 601(b) (21) of Regulation S-K, the
names of subsidiaries, which considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary,
would not constitute a significant subsidiary (as defined under
Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X) as of December 31, 2002 have
been omitted.
CAUSE NO. 12-13-00262- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

WASSON INTERESTS, LTD, § APPEALED FROM 2ND

Appellant, §

§

V. § DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR

§

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, TEXAS, §

Appellee. § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON REMAND

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

NOW COMES Appellant, Wasson Interests, Ltd., filing this, its Unopposed First

Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Supplemental Brief on Remand, and in support

thereof, respectfully shows the Court as follows:

1. On June 13, 2016, this Court rendered a Per Curium Order, granting Petitioner

thirty (30) days, until July 13, 2016, to file any supplemental brief it deemed necessary

for the Court’s consideration on remand.

2. Appellant is asking the Court for a fourteen (14) day extension, until July 27,

2016, to file its supplemental brief.

3. Appellant seeks this extension because its attorney now works for the Nueces

County Attorney’s Office, and is therefore only able to work in his capacity as

Appellant’s attorney during nonbusiness hours.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully prays the Court

grant this motion, thereby extending Appellant’s deadline to fil e its supplemental brief on ACCEPTED

12-13-00262-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/11/2016 4:15:32 PM

Pam Estes

CLERKremand until July 27, 2016, and for all other relief to which Appellant may be entitled to

at law or in equity.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Jeffrey R. Pruitt____

J EFFREY R. P RUITT

A TTORNEY AT L AW

Bar No. 24070453

400 Breez eway

Corpus Christi, TX 78404

Phone: (336) 749

- 6477

Jeffrey_pruitt@att.net

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTCERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned hereby certifies that he conferred with Appellee’s attorney of

record, Brett Brewer, on July 11, 2016, and Appellee is unopposed to Appellant’s motion.

/s/ Jeffrey R. Pruitt

Jeffrey R. Pruitt

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the for go ing was served

on July 11, 2016 as follows:

Via Email: brettbrewer@normanlawfirm.com

Mr. Brett Brewer

The Norman Law Firm

215 E. Commerce St.

P.O. Box 1870

Jacksonville, TX 75766

/s/ Jeffrey R. Pruitt

Jeffrey R. Pruitt
# C_2011335EN.01001401.xml

| 16.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/14

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 November 2011

2011/C 335/08

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3532 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 104,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4427 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85345 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1238 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2405 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,768 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,77 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7002 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4145 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3495 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4299 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3351 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3866 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5313 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7591 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7487 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 527,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0087 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5842 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4815 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 170,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2714 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,909 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,5550 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,746 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3904 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3765 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,5800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3532

JPY

Japanese yen

104,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4427

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85345

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1238

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2405

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,768

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,77

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7002

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4145

RON

Romanian leu

4,3495

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4299

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3351

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3866

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5313

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7591

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7487

KRW

South Korean won

1 527,99

ZAR

South African rand

11,0087

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5842

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4815

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 170,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2714

PHP

Philippine peso

58,909

RUB

Russian rouble

41,5550

THB

Thai baht

41,746

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3904

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3765

INR

Indian rupee

68,5800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Jerry FERGUSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1115.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 23, 1972.

Rehearing Denied June 7, 1972.

Engel & Halpern, Miami, and David Javitz, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Campbell v. State, 155 Fla. 359, 20 So.2d 127 (1944).
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38763-38764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16874]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable 
legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property 
subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. 
persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with 
them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Associate Director for Global 
Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions 
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490; Assistant Director for 
Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory 
Affairs, tel. 202-622-4855; or the Department of the Treasury's Office 
of the General Counsel: Office of the Chief Counsel (Foreign Assets 
Control), tel.: 202-622-2410.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action(s)

    On August 1, 2018, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are 
blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.

Individuals

    1. SOYLU, Suleyman; DOB 21 Nov 1969; POB Istanbul, Turkey; 
nationality Turkey; Gender Male (individual) [GLOMAG].
    Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(ii)(C)(1) of Executive Order 
13818 of December 20, 2017, ``Blocking the Property of Persons 
Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption'' (E.O. 13818) 
for being or having been a leader or official of Turkey's

[[Page 38764]]

Ministry of Interior, an entity that has engaged in, or whose 
members have engaged in, serious human rights abuse relating to the 
leader's or official's tenure.
    2. GUL, Abdulhamit; DOB 12 Mar 1977; POB Nizip, Gaziantep, 
Turkey; nationality Turkey; Gender Male (individual) [GLOMAG].

    Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(ii)(C)(1) of E.O. 13818 for 
being or having been a leader or official of Turkey's Ministry of 
Justice, an entity that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged 
in, serious human rights abuse relating to the leader's or official's 
tenure.

    Dated: August 1, 2018.
Andrea Gacki,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2018-16874 Filed 8-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Northeast Utilities (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.    /s/Charles W. ShiveryCharles W. ShiveryChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  February 26, 2010   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38759-38760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15618 and #15619; Vermont Disaster Number VT-
00035]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Vermont

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 38760]]

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of VERMONT (FEMA-
4380-DR), dated 07/30/2018.
    Incident: Severe Storm and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 05/04/2018 through 05/05/2018.

DATES: Issued on 07/30/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/28/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/30/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 07/30/2018, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Chittenden, Grand Isle, Lamoille, Orange, Orleans
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 156186 
and for economic injury is 156190.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-16868 Filed 8-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
LLOYD PHELPS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-3887

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 27, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

Terry P. Roberts of Law Office of Terry P. Roberts, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lloyd Phelps, challenges his convictions and sentences for firstdegree murder and evidence tampering and raises three issues on appeal. We find 

no merit in Appellant’s arguments that the trial court erred in refusing to give his 

requested jury instruction and in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on 
the tampering charge. In his remaining argument, Appellant contends that the trial 

court erred in calling Johnny Flowers as a “court witness” pursuant to section 

90.615(1), Florida Statutes,1 in light of the 1990 amendment to section 90.608, 

Florida Statutes, which allows for any party, including the party calling a witness, 

to attack the witness’s credibility. In essence, Appellant argues that the court 

witness rule is no longer necessary or appropriate based upon section 90.608. 

However, our review of the record shows that the primary basis upon which 

Appellant objected to Mr. Flowers being called as a court witness was that the 

State improperly relied upon contradictory evidence provided by its other 

witnesses in representing that it could not vouch for Mr. Flowers’ credibility. 

Because the specific argument raised on appeal was not argued below, it was not 

preserved for appeal. See State v. Petroni, 123 So. 3d 62, 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) 

(“To preserve an argument for appeal, an appellant must timely and 

contemporaneously object at the trial level, on a stated legal basis, and then raise 

that specific contention again on appeal.”). 

Accordingly, we AFFIRM. 

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.

1 Section 90.615(1) provides that a court “may call witnesses whom all parties may 

cross-examine.” The court witness rule was designed for those instances “where a 

party cannot vouch for the witness’s credibility, yet the witness’s evidence is so 

important that the interest of justice demands an evidentiary vehicle to have the 

person testify.” Shere v. State, 579 So. 2d 86, 92 (Fla. 1991). 

2
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0400 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2009 - SW - 48 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,585                   5,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166,747                 166,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               205,794                 205,794
<PP&E>                                         339,640                 339,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,860,969               3,860,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,899                  78,899
<BONDS>                                      1,549,596               1,549,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          2                       2
<COMMON>                                           949                     949
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,426,924               1,426,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,860,969               3,860,969
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,546                 366,476
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               133,841                 265,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,016                  59,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,219                  38,641
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,870                  17,776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,349                  20,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,349                  20,995
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17                    0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17                    0.22


</TABLE>
# C_2011362EN.01000101.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/1

---

2011/C 362/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 355, 3.12.2011

OJ C 355, 3.12.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 347, 26.11.2011

OJ C 340, 19.11.2011

OJ C 331, 12.11.2011

OJ C 319, 29.10.2011

OJ C 311, 22.10.2011

OJ C 305, 15.10.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---