alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6338

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH LEON KAY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Thomas E. Johnston, 

District Judge. (6:09-cr-00252-1)

Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Leon Kay, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Steven Loew, 

Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Leon Kay appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Kay, No. 6:09-cr-00252-

1 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012251EN.01000201.xml

| 21.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6618 — Raiffeisen Bank International/Raiffeisen Bank Polska)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 251/03

On 30 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6618. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6618. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
FORM 10-K                                    Page 209

Exhibit 10.1(a)

                   FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                 EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN

                             OF

                   CONE MILLS CORPORATION
         (As Amended and Restated December 1, 1994)

     FIRST AMENDMENT, dated May 9, 1995, to the Employees'
Retirement Plan of Cone Mills Corporation, As Amended and
Restated December 1, 1994 (the "Plan").

                           RECITAL

     The Plan presently provides that a distribution pursuant
to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order entered with respect
to a Member's Account may not be made prior to the Member's
"earliest retirement age," as defined in Section 414(p) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").  Under
Section 414(p) of the Code, an earlier distribution date is
permitted if provided for in the Plan and authorized by the
Qualified Domestic Relations Order.  To facilitate plan
administration, the Pension Committee has recommended that the
Plan be amended so that a distribution pursuant to a Qualified
Domestic Relations Order may be made prior to a Member's
"earliest retirement date."

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan be and hereby is amended,
effective May 9, 1995, by deleting the last three sentences of
Section 5.09 and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

     "Plan benefits will be paid pursuant to a Qualified
     Domestic Relations Order to such Alternative
     Payee(s) at such times and in such amounts as are
     stated therein, even if the affected Member has not
     separated from service and has not reached the
     "earliest retirement age", as defined in Code
     Section 414(p); provided, however, that a Qualified
     Domestic Relations Order may not require the Plan
     to provide any type or form of benefit or any
     option not otherwise provided and may not require
     the Plan to provide increased benefits.  The
     Pension Committee shall establish reasonable
     procedures to determine the qualified status of
     domestic relations orders and to administer
     distributions under orders that are determined to
     be Qualified Domestic Relations Orders."



<PAGE>
FORM 10-K                                    Page 210

Exhibit 10.1(a)   (continued)



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment, having been
approved by the Board of Directors of Cone Mills Corporation
at a meeting duly held on May 9, 1995, is signed by the
Secretary of the Corporation on the 19 day of May, 1995.

                         CONE MILLS CORPORATION

                         By:    /s/ Terry L. Weatherford     

                         Title: Vice President and Secretary
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Birner Dental Management
Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:





1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78, or 78o(d));
      and





2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the period covered by the
Report.





Date:
                          
                          May
      14, 2010By:
                          
                          /s/
      Frederic W.J. BirnerName:
                          
                          Frederic
      W.J. BirnerTitle:
                          
                          Chief
      Executive OfficerBy:
                          
                          /s/
      Dennis N. GentyName:
                          
                          Dennis
      N. GentyTitle:
                          
                          Chief
      Financial
Officer
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Second Quarter 1999 and 1998

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     Second quarter 1999
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       9.2        8.5       11.9
      For rent............................       2.6        2.8        2.1
      For sale only.......................       0.9        0.9        1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.9        0.9        0.8
      Held off market.....................       4.8        4.0        7.8
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        3.3
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.9        0.9        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.3        2.0        3.7

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.7        7.4

    Occupied..............................      87.9       90.0       80.7



                                                     Second quarter 1998
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       9.1        8.5       11.2
      For rent............................       2.7        2.8        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.0        0.9        1.2
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.9        0.7
      Held off market.....................       4.6        3.9        7.2
        For occasional use................       1.5        1.2        2.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.9
        For other reasons.................       2.3        2.0        3.4

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.7        1.6        7.1

    Occupied..............................      88.2       90.0       81.7
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0458 IN THE MATTER OF: B.F., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 15 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 5 2024

06/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0458
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                       SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF DANIEL


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY*                                                          JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
-------------------                                                          -----------------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>

Daniel Measurement and Control, Inc.                                                              Delaware
         Daniel Flow Products Ltd.                                                                  Canada

Daniel Industries Foreign Sales Corporation                                                 Virgin Islands

Daniel Valve Company                                                                              Delaware
         Oilfield Fabricating & Machine, Inc.                                                        Texas

Bettis Corporation                                                                                Delaware
         Bettis Holdings, Ltd.                                                              United Kingdom
              Bettis UK Ltd.                                                                United Kingdom
              Prime Actuator Control Systems UK Ltd.                                        United Kingdom
         Bettis Canada Ltd.                                                                         Canada
         Bettis GmbH                                                                               Germany
         Bettis France SARL                                                                         France
         Dantorque A/S                                                                             Denmark
         Shafer Valve Company                                                                         Ohio
         Bettis Electric Actuator Corporation                                                     Delaware
         Bettis Foreign Sales Corp.                                                               Barbados
         Bettis Controls Pvt. Ltd. (50%)                                                             India

Daniel International Ltd.                                                                   United Kingdom
         Daniel Europe Ltd.                                                                 United Kingdom
              Spectra-Tek International Ltd.                                                United Kingdom
                   Daniel Asia Pacific Ltd.                                                      Singapore
              Spectra-Tek Holdings Ltd.                                                     United Kingdom
                   Advanced Spectra-Tek Private Ltd. (40%)                                           India
</TABLE>




*Ownership at 100% unless otherwise specified.
#### David Patrick BEACH v. Martha Terry BEACH.

No. 62365.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Martha Terry Beach Statum applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.

TATE, DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 23.1

BAGELL,
JOSEPHS, LEVINE & COMPANY, L.L.C.Certified Public
Accountants

High Ridge Commons
Suites 400-403
200 Haddonfield Berlin Road
Gibbsboro, New Jersey 08026
(856) 346-2828 Fax (856) 346-2882

Securities
and Exchange Commission 
Washington,
D.C. 20549

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

We
consent to the use in this Amendment No. 1 of the 10-KSB of our report dated
October 8, 2007, relating to the financial statements of Conolog Corporation ;and to the reference to
our Firm under the caption Experts in the Prospectus.

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Bagell, Josephs, Levine & Company, LLC
| |                                           
| | Bagell, Josephs, Levine
 & Company, LLC   

Gibbsboro,
New Jersey 
October
25, 2007

---
No. 11532.

#### Bowman *v.*Schatzinger et al.

Decided February 8, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahog'a county.

*Messrs. Weed, Miller & Nason,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Paul G. Kassulker,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  First Quarter 2004 and 2005







                                    Rental vacancy rates





                           First        First           90-Percent

         Area             quarter      quarter   Confidence Interval (+)a

                           2004         2005     of 2005 rate of difference





United States..........        10.4         10.1          0.4          0.5



  Inside Core-Based

     Statistical Areas..       NA           10.1          0.5           NA

    In central cities..        NA           10.4          0.6           NA

    Not in central cities

    (suburbs)..........        NA            9.7          0.7           NA

  Outside Core-Based

    Statistical Areas..        NA            9.7          1.5           NA



 Northeast.............         7.9          7.2          0.7          0.8

 Midwest...............        12.3         12.2          0.9          1.0

 South.................        12.7         12.2          0.9          1.0

 West..................         7.6          7.5          0.8          0.9







                                    Homeowner vacancy rates





                           First        First           90-Percent

         Area             quarter      quarter   Confidence Interval (+)a

                           2004         2005     of 2005 rate of difference



United States..........         1.7          1.8          0.1          0.1



  Inside Core-Based

     Statistical Areas..       NA            1.8          0.1           NA

    In central cities..        NA            2.0          0.3           NA

    Not in central cities

    (suburbs)..........        NA            1.7          0.2           NA

  Outside Core-Based

    Statistical Areas..        NA            1.9          0.3           NA



 Northeast.............         0.9          1.8          0.3          0.3

 Midwest...............         2.1          2.3          0.3          0.3

 South.................         2.0          1.9          0.2          0.3

 West..................         1.3          1.2          0.2          0.3

    aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence interval is, in

     relation to the size of the estimate, the less reliable the estimate.

NA Not available.  Core-Based Statistical Area data for 2005 and later are not comparable to earlier data.  Beginning

in first quarter 2005, the Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey is using the new metropolitan and micropolitan

statistical definitions which were announced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in June 2003, and were based on the

application of the 2000 standards to Census 2000 data.  OMB announced updates as of December 2003, based on application of the

2000 standards to more recent Census Bureau estimates.  The December 2003 definitions are available at:

http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html.
# C_2011321EN.01000101.xml

| 4.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6356 — GE/IR/UEC/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 321/01

On 27 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6356. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6356. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10 (a)

                             CPC INTERNATIONAL INC.
                         1984 STOCK AND PERFORMANCE PLAN
                                 AMENDMENT NO. 5

THIS INSTRUMENT made this 17th day of February, 1998 by Bestfoods, formerly
known as CPC International Inc. (the "Company").

                                   WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, the Company maintains that CPC International Inc. 1984 Stock and
Performance Plan, effective as of April 26, 1984, and as subsequently amended
(the "Plan"); and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to reflect changes in applicable
law and for certain other matters;

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the required approval of stockholders of the Company
pursuant to Section 1.9(a) of the Plan, the Plan is amended as follows:

FIRST:   The name of the Plan is revised to be the Bestfoods 1984 Stock and
         Performance Plan.

SECOND:  The reference in Section 1.1 of the Plan to "CPC International Inc.
         (the "Company") is revised to "Bestfoods (the "Company").

THIRD:   Section 1.9(a) is revised to read as follows:

         "(a) The Board of Directors shall have the authority to amend, suspend
         or terminate the Plan or any portion thereof at any time, provided that
         no amendment shall be made without stockholder approval which shall (i)
         increase (except as provided in Section 1.5(b) hereof) the total number
         of shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the Plan, (ii) materially
         change the classes of Employees eligible to be Participants, (iii)
         decrease the minimum option pries stated in Section 2.2 hereof (other
         than to change the manner of determining Fair Market Value to conform
         to any then-applicable provision of the Code or regulations
         thereunder), (iv) extend the expiration date of the Plan, (v) withdraw
         the administration of the Plan from a committee consisting of two or
         more members, each of whom is a Non-Employee Director, or (vi)
         constitute amendment for which shareholder approval is required under
         applicable law. Subject to the proviso in the first sentence of this
         subsection (a), the Committee shall have the authority to amend the
         Plan if such amendment (i) is required by legislation or regulations or
         is requested by a government agency, or (ii) is administrative in
         nature. No amendment, suspension or termination shall alter or impair
         any right theretofore granted to any Participant, without the consent
         of such Participant."

FOURTH:  This Amendment is effective as of January 20, 1998, contingent upon
         approval by stockholders of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bestfoods has caused this Amendment to be executed by its
duly authorized officer and its corporate seal to be affixed hereto on the date
set forth above.

                                                      Bestfoods
                                             By

ATTEST:
(Corporate Seal)