Dear Abel Acosta, (CCA), Clerk, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
March 6, 2015
RE: EX PARTE ARTHUR DAVID LOWS, WR-25,679-22; CAUSE No.659154-B Please find**enclos~d** Applicant's Original Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, in your official records-wR-25,679-22. referred to and supplying a**~opy** here-with. Being Applicant is unable to make ciDpies. Being incarcerated (TDCJ-ID), Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division, at the Hughes Unit. NO offender{s), are**perm~t~d** to make copies. nor is there any copy unit supplied for Offender(s) use. Please filed the same and present to the Court**th~** !Motion For Reconsideration', in reference to the above Writ**Numb~r** and Cause Number. Being this Motion and**Re~** cords to the attention of the**H~norable Justic~**  of the Court's attention. And Please, up-date me on any actions taken. I, truly**appreci~te** your consideration
...THANK YOU
...May GOD Bless Yuo, Yuor Family and Friends.
Sincerely 

# Wzi!zw1 

# d&J.Jt ARTHUR DAVID LOWE#669750 HUGHES UNIT. RT. 2. BOX 4400. GATESVILLE, TEXAS 76597

### REC!E~VED 

# IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS

### ~AR 

## 09 

## 2015COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS WR-25,679-22; CAUSE No.659154-B EX PARTE ARTHUR DAVID LOWE Applicant,


### v. THE STATE: OF TEXAS §
§ § Representative(s), ASSISTANT. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, [Sharon Y. Chu], Respondant. § IN.THE 339TH DISTRICT COURT

OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO TBE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL**APPEALS:~** NOW COMES, Arthur D·avid Lowe, [J:leteinafter referred to as Applicant}, and respectfully, submits this •Motion For Reconsideration'. And will show the following: [APPLICANT IS ILLEGALLY**RESTRAINE~]** Applicant was convicted by a jury, On October 25, 1993, and**Sen~'** ·tenced October 28, 1993. To [LIFE]--In the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Diyision (TDCJ-ID), Formerly the Texas Department Of Corrections. I On January 19, 1995, the First Court of Appeals affirmed Applicant's appeal. Lowe 

## v. State,**01-93-0~985-CR,** 1995 WL 19052 (Tex.**App~-** Houston [lst. Dist.] Jan. 19* 1995»(mem. Op., not designated for publication).

1.II Applicant filed an initial Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging the convictton. Cause No.659154-A.the trial Court On the 'State's Original Answer and Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Orders.'-Adopted the State's Assistant District Attorney's Proposed Findings and**Order~** by signing the [same]. That**effective~.** iy [DISPOSED] -ALL Appl'icant 's**cl~aims** [WITHOUT CONSIDERATION], and ALL the 'Motions' filed with the initial Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus; presented with supported certified records and**affida~** vits. JL[][ Pursuant to Texas Code Criminal Procedure Ann. article 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 1993 & 201-3). The Harris County, District Clerk, as Ordered by and through the State's Assistant District Attorney [Sharon Y. Chu] I in accordence with Section 3(c), forwarded limited records, filed in the Habeas Corpus proceeding. IV The Texas**Suprem~** Court of Criminal Appeals, On ['December 18, 2013] [DENIED WITHOUT WRITTEN ORDER] Applicant's initial**Ap~lication** for Writ of**H~beas** Corpus. 

### v After the final disposition of Applicant's First Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus [December 18, 2013]. Applicant came in knowledge that the trial Court was not afforded

2

### to consider Applicant's**~s~parate** 

### Memorandum' with attached certified records and affidavits, and**Mot~ohs',** 

### in support of his claims. Theref6re,. Applicant refiled the 'Motion Reformation Aggravated kidnapping Judgment.'**T~~** 

### records reflect that, the trial Court**rece~** 

### ived, the 'Motion' On April 14, 2014, and On [April 21, 2014], the trial Court [GRANTED], Applicant's 'Motion', and made Orders ·'NUNC PRO**TUNC'~\~earing** 

### and further Orders the Correction of Applicant's

'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE'. Conducting such hearing ALL in Applicant's [ABSENCE]. Actions taken in Violation of Statutory provision. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.03, §l(a)(Vernon Supp.**20l~)[Sen** 

### tence**sh~ll** 

### be pronounced in the Defendant's Presence]. VI The trial Court· actionsiri:n [GRANTING], Applicant's 'Motion' was to conform with the'Jury's Actual Verdict'to the 'Special Issue' pursuant to**T~X.PENAL** 

### CODE ANN.**§20~04(b)(Vernon** 

### 1993); See also Williams V. State, 851 S.W. 2d 282 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)(AS A MATTERQF LAW]. VII In the instant case, the records unequivocally reflect the trial Court's Order Correction of Applicant's 'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE' from ) 

### the egregious entry in the Original 'Judgment and Sentence' of**[Pir~t** 

### Degree Aggravated kidnapp;i·ng Judgment] the trial Court made the lawful Correction to Applicant's 'JUDGMENT AD SENTENCE'--Reduced the Offense to [SECOND DEGREE AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPING]--The records NOW being Corrected by the trial Court reflect 'SECGND DEGREE AGGRAVATED KIDNAPP:::--·

3lNG RELEASE VICTIM IN .A SAFE PLACE]: See TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. §20.04{b) (Vernon 1993); See also TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. §12.33 [Second Degree Pun-- ishment]. Compared to TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. §12.32 [First Degree Punishment]. The trial Court Ordered the Correction of Applicant 'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE" the Orders Reduced the Offense to"Second Degree Aggravated Kidnapping'. However, Applicant remain under Sentence [LIFE]. VIII The trial'Court ERRED in signing--Adopted the State's Original Ans- ' wer and Proposed Finding of**F~cts** and**Concl~sions** of. Law and Order.**T~** [DISMISS]--Applicant's Applicati6n for Writ of Habeas Corpus as nonecompliance with Article 11.07, §4. Whereas, the records.reflect and**~pplicant** Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus,**aTht~ough** being a Second Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the trial Court [GRANTED] Applicant 'Motion• On [April 21, 2014] Corrected Applicant's 'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE' Reduced the Offense from lst Degree Aggravated Kidnapping [TO] 2nd Degree Aggravated Kidnapping. The [GRANTING] of Applicant's 'Motion• and Correction of records in Reduced Applicant's 'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE" occurred [AFTER]--the final [DISPOSITION] of the initial Application On [December 18, 2013]. Therefore, the**~urrent** claim was not and could not have been presented in the initial Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, because the factual and legal basis for the claim was unavailable on the date disposition of Applicant First Application [DENID]--December 18, 2013. The current claim became an issue for legal basis On April 21, 2014. In



### 4

### addressing**wh~ther** 

### the instant Application is barred as a 'Subsequent Application' Under Section 4, Or whether if it falls within
an exception, 6f:.Section, 4(a)(l), provides; (a) 'If a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus, if fil-**~·** 

### ed after final disposition of an initial application, challenging the same conviction; a court may not consider the merits of or grant relief based on the subsequent application; 'unless thE);

### apfi,.iib~tibri''**c6i.tiiifi's·~ sti£tit'i~rit**  ;_facts establishing that; (1) 'the current claim and issue have not and could not have

been presented previously in an original application or a previously considered application under this Article because the "factual or legal basis for the:.cliiim was unavailable on, the

date the applicant filed the previous application[.] (c)'for the purpose of subsection (a)(l), a factual basis of a

Claim is unavailable on or about a date described by subsection (a)(l) the**f~ttual** 

### basis was rtot asertainable through the**exer~'** 

### cise of**re~sonable** 

### diligence on or before the date. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. 

### ANN. art. 11.07, 

### §4(a)(l), Thu$ the court's are barred from considering the merits of an applicant's application, 'Unless the facts:givill'llg rise to the claim, made in the instant Application could not hawe been presented in the initial Application because they were "not asertainable through the exercise of reasonable diligence on or before the date of the initial Application.• In the instant AppJication for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records

5

## .. unequivocally reflect, and' as Applicant has demoristrated above and the referred to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus.shows that the current claim was not and could not have been presented in the initial Application for Writ of**H~beas** Corpus. {DENIED][DECEMBER 18,**2013]~** The Claims being raised in the instant Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus--WR-25,679-22, Cause No.659154-B. was not available for any factual or legal basis to be raised for consideration until [APRIL 21, 2014].

6

### make Orders to comply with Statutory provision. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.03, §l(a)(Vernon 2014)[the Sentence shall be Pronouced in the Defendant's Presence]. ***IJ;iJ,this case [The Sentence has NOT been Pronouced i1111 ([Applicant's]) Presence]. Applicant is entitle to Due Process Rights and Due Course of Law,
as well as a Constitutional Right to have the Sentence in which He is to serve Pronuonced in His Presence. ORAL PRONOUNCEMENT OF SENTENCE The trial Court's Ordered 'NUNC PRO TUNC' 'CORRECTION' of Applicant's 'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE'. In Applicant's [ABSENCE]. Applicant have a Due Process Right to have the Sentence Orally Pronounced in His Presence. See Marshall 

## v. State, 860 

## s.w. 2d 142 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1993, no pet); Ex parte Madding, 70 s.w. 3d 131 (Tex.**Cri~.** 

### App.**2002)~Taylor** 

### V. State, 131 s.w. 3d 500 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004)(citing Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.03, §I(a)(Vernoll1l 2006). The trial Court's Orders 'NUNC PRO TUNC' hearing reflects that the trial Court presiding Judge Corrected Applicant's 'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE'. Pursuant to TEX.P.EJNIAL CODE ANNr.;_§20.• 04.(bi)(Vernon Supp. 1993 § 

### 2014). See also Hughes V. State, 493 S.w.· 2d 166, 170 (Tex. Crim. A:pp. 1973)("A judgment may be reformed so as to show the offense of which the accused was found guilty by the court or Jury) 

### s:ee 9-lso Ex Parte Philip, 176 S.W._.3d 818 (Tex.- Crim. App. 2005)["The expectation of having the oral prouncement match the written judgment applies to sentencing issues, as the term of confinement assessed and whether

7multiple sentence would be**s~rved** concurrently"). It is ERROR for the trial Court to enter Orders 'NUNC PRO TNC' hearing Correction of Applicant's 'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE' without affording Applicant
an opporunity to be at the hearing, sentencing, represented by Counsel in avvord to Applicant's Due Process of Law. See Shaw V. State, 539 

## s.w. 2d 887 (Tex. Cr. App. 1976). In Mitchell 

## v. State, 942 

## s.w. 2d 170 (Tex. App.-Amerillo, 1997) ("the appellant court, held that, when valid judgment of conviction for first degree felony offense was not nunc pro tunc judgment, but merely a correction made during**th~** term time, was ho requirement for**netic~,** hearing and proof in defendant's presence"). Whereas, In Vallez V. S'tate, 21 

### s.w. 3d 778 (Tex. App-San Antonio 2000) (''entry of nunc pro tunc judgment indicated that defendant's three controlled substance prosecuting has not been**conso~idated** for plea apd sehtencing, was ERROR, where .defendant was not given opportunty to be present**~t** the**hea~ing** and be**hea~d** and represented by counsel, to accord him due**process")~** ON FEDERAL REVIEW A defendnat is constitutional entitled .to due process, at a bare**minimu~,** due process requires that a defendant be give notice if the punishment to which he has been sentenced. See e.g.,Landford 

### v. Idaho, 500 

## u.s. 110, 111 

## s.ct. 1723 (199l)("[A] notice of issue to be resolved by the adverary process is a fundamental charactisic of fair procedure:);Baldwin V. Hale, 68 

## u.s. 68, 233. I. well (1863)([C]ommon justice requires that no man be condemned in his person or property

8**withb~i** 

### notice and an opproturiity to make his defense'') ;In re oliver, 333 u.s. 257, 68 s.ct. 499 (1945)(due process requires that a person be given reasonable notice of a charge aganist him1 and an opportunity to examine the witnesses**~gainst** 

### him to offer testimony/ to be represented by counsel);e.g.,doweney v. United States, 67 App. 192, 91 F.3d 233, 239**(1937)(~changes** 

### in the records of judgment made without notice to defendant or**oppo~tun~y** 

### to be heard would deprive person of liberty without due process of law; [P]roceeding in absence of appellant to correct the record would have been improper/ sence the ulimate question involved/ extent of a valid imprisonment which he might be subjected/ was one of vital interest. to him'');United States**v.~Spiers,** 

### 82 F.3d 1274, 1282 (3d Cir.**1996)(bec~use** 

### had notice and was**prese~t** 

### in court-room rights were not effected by the**failu~e** 

### to give effect to a complete defense to prosecution. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 43/ [Defendant shall be Present during the Pronouncement of Sentence]; See also United States v. Vega, 332 F.3d 849, 852 (5th Cir. 2003); FED.R. CRIM. P. 43{a) (3) (**~reguiring** 

### the defendant
... be present at**sentencing~)~** 

### th[is] Constitutional Right
... is rooted to
a large extent in the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendmant1 but
...is [also] protected by the Due Process clause in some situations. Where the defendant is not. actually confronting witnesses or evidence against him''); See United States v. Gagnon, 470 

## u.s. 522, 526, 105 s.ct. 1482 (1985)(internal citation omitted).**There~ore1** 

### if the written judgment conflicts with the sentence proriounced at sentencing/ the pronouncement cbntrols. See United States

9r 

## v. Martinez, 254 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir. 2000). If, :however, the difference between the two is only an determine the sentence. See United States 

## v. Warden, 291**F~3d** 

### 363, 365 (5th Cir.), cert. denied. 537 

## u.
s. 935, 123 s.ct. 35 {2000). In this instant case, reaching this conclusion, on the States level. TEX.COJI)E CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.03, §l(a)(Vernon 2014);Abon 

## v. State, 997 s.w. 2d 281, 282 (Tex. App.-Dall.as 1998)(A Defendant has a Constitutional Right to be**Pres~nt** 

### at Sentence):Aguilar V. State, 202 s.w. 3d 840, 843 {Tex. App.-Waco [lOth Dist], 2006)(Art**icl~** 

### 42.03, Sectibn l(a), of the**Texas0Cod~~Crimina~-Procedure,** 

### pro**vides~** 

### that**"Sentenc~** 

### sha11 be pronounced in the**D~fendant's** 

### Presence." TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.03, §l(a)(Vernon supp. 2005), [2] When**th~** 

### defendant is convicted of more than one offense in**th~** 

### same proceeding, the court must pronounce whether the sentence will run concurrently or consecutively. See id. art. 42.08 (Vernon Supp. 2005). See also Blakely V. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531 {2005). Therefore, based on the records of the 'NUNC' PRO-'TUNC!, hearing proceeding, [A]LL in Applicant's [ABSENCE]. Corrected the 'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE'. Is ERROR on a magnitude .that Violates Applicant's Due Process of Law, to hold such a· hearing with'out Appl itant being present, to afford the opportunity to be represented by Counsel, in accord to Applicant's Due caurse: of Law
... [this actual] 'Nunc Pro Tunc •, hearing in open Court where the presiding Judge the Honorable [Maria T. (Terri) Jackson of the 339th District Court can only be found on the Court's actual minutes, because the Deputy Clerk [L. Guevara], DID

10

### NOT filed the**~cfual Ord~ra,1by**  

### the trial Court. However, the Correction of Applicant's 'JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE' 

### can also be found in the official records o£ the Court of Criminal Appeals, Clerk'. The {CCA), Order On July 28, 2014 [Supplemental to the Court Clerk's offic.ial records]. 

### See WR-25,679-15. 

### Thus, the Court should follow the well-settled law set-out in Vasquez, 

### because it violates a defendant's Constitutional Rights to Due Process and due Caurse of Law, to Orally Pronuonce Sentence· to Him and then later without giving Applicant an opportunity to be heared, enter a written judgment imposing a significant harsher Sentence. See Ex parte Vasquez, 712 

## s.w. 2d 754 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975). CONCLUSION OF PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES, CONSIDERED, 

### Applicant prays 

### this Honorable Ccutt of Criminal Appeals,**~ustice,** 

### ,Reconsider each and every point raised herein and take the appropriate legal actibns, as the**la~** 

### and justice requires, in protection of Applicant's Due Process Rights, and Due Course of Law,**ThuS~~this** 

### ERROR being on Constitutional Rights, that the court should NOT just turn a blind eye. The Sentence should be Pronounce, in Applicant's Presence. Respectfully Submitted 

# f21tAwJ 

# dome ARTHUR DAVID LOWE#669750 HUGHES UNIT. RT. 2. 

### BOX 4400 GATESVILLE, TEXAS 76597 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### I, Arthur David Lowe, being thec·Applicant herein, and hereby certify

11that the foregoing•Motion for reconsideration' and 'Exhibits appended
. with!1this 'Motion' herein, has been delivered by U.S. Postal service. To the Court oL Criminal Appeals, and I SWARE UNDER PENITLY OF PERJURY, that ALL the contents and statements made herein and Exhibits are**T~DE** and CORRECT. and that this Honorable Court can verify the same. I filed and submits this to this Court, for Reconsideration. On this 

## ___,b

__, day of

## ~~'~:.L.JA..r:::..-tC-~~-·

## _, 2015
.



### 12 Respectfully Submitted 

# Ctti!J11/J**~** ARTHUR DAVID LOWE#669750 HUGHES UNIT. RT. 2. BOX 4400 GATESVILLE, TEXAS 76597the above captured cause numer. On this 

# __ fa

__, day of _11_,_1\.....:..

### I{L~C~H 

## __ I 2015
. Respectfully Submitted



# /};tJ!Jw**d~** ARTHUR DAVID LOWE#669750 HUGHES UNIT. RT. 2. BOX 4400 GATESVILLE, TEXAS 76597
MASTER INDEX 'EXHIBXTS' No. Vol

2 Trial Court's Oder Corrected Judgment and Sentence 2 1 of 2 Judgment and Sentence 2 1 The1 339th Deputy Clerk [ L. Guevara], altered Orders &·: 1 1 of 2 Judgmeht arid Seritence 2 1 The Jury's Actual Verdict On •·special Issue' Form 1 1 District Clerk's acknowledgment of**[Disp~sition** of 1 initial Applicanion for Writ of habeas Corpus.

13 Respectfully Submitted 

# &thwJdOL<tt. ARTHUR DAVID LOWE#669750 Pro Se.

# CHRIS DANIEL HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK 

# I 

# I 1 

### I**~** 

## .**~ :'fJ'~OFi~~**  

### Direct Dial Line: 

# l

# ARTH~R LOWE#669750
. I 

### HUGHfSUNIT 

### RT. 2. BOX 4400 I 

### GATESVILLE, TX 76597
.

Dear 1 • 

### LOWE, · 

# I:8J Ylur motion/request NUNC PRO TUNC was filed with the District Clerk and on 

### o4121114 the Court: 

# I 

# I

l .1 

### 1 

# J-·······

D Tookno aCtion 

## D Denied your Motion/Request 

# I l [g1 Granted your motion/request 

### 1 

### D Took action 

## D Advised attorney ofrecord 

## 0 Other 

# I:8J 0 her: PLEASE FIND ATTACHED A COPY OF THE CORRECTED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE. ALSO, OUR RECORDS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED TO REFLECT 2N° 

### DEGREE FELONY

- AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPING RELEASE VICTIM IN A SAFE PLACE.

By:

P.O. BOX ;4651 • .HOUSTON, TEXAS 77210-4651 • (713) 755-5749 · l 

### l 

# l 

# l i 

# l 

# I

# l...........

......**a·~-~f** 

# HA..v;;,····... ,·**~ .4·~······**  

### \5' "' • 

# ··**/.~.J·'u....** 

# ···....**~\ -~·**  

### "....._. :,.v·: . • .,. • a ,.--._ • . : ...,. :

.. "*'-'"
....... 

### !**~!** 

### . :**~** 

### ·: 

# .**-..~.** - 

# .**~-** 

# . .**~** . ... 

# . '1.**::;.-.~..** .•**·~** :



## ......

## ~'~··············~ 

# •..:**·-I.~** (J 'tl 

# s ..··**·············~···** I, Chris 

### Daniel District Clerk of

### Hams County, Texas certify that this is a true

### ~d correct c6py ofthe original record filed and or 

### recordedt· my office. electronically or hard copy, as i appears onthis date. Witness official hand and seal of office this 

# May 2. 2014 ·
Certified E>ocwnent Nwnber: 

### 60519986

# ~~ Chris

# DJeL DISTRICT 

### CLERK HARRIS CbUNTY, TEXAS

) 

### In accordance with Texas Government Code 406.013 electronically 1ransmitted authenticated documents are valid. 

### H there 

### is a question regarding the validity ofthis document and or seal please e-mail

### ~upport@hcdistrictclerk.com · 

# i l 1 

# I I 

# l I 

# I\\ 

# (ii) itECiJHIJElrs MEMORANDUM: rl1i=-
.. instrume!H is Of !)IIOf {jllillity and 1lflt ;u1t.i5fdt:tory ft•r ph(t¥Jgraphic**n;c!;rd;~thm; ;,n~fi;lr** **:~l:.~r;~tinrls** we1e pn!'5enl r:t**th~~ tir.1~** **~,!** r;lnllnl{.**&Jfff0£Ct~** /!)·'f .UUNC. 

### 1'Qo I{_;JJ(_ 

## 6<,- 

### t( 

## I

# t: <-1 

### GIJTt'(

### D~i?l). 4

# \ll \zolt
NO.

______________________ ___ 

### }]1

## ~ THE STATE OF TEXAS vs.**~** ON JURY**~ICT** OP GUILTY Judge

## Presidi~g:**LA£1"'~(** 

## {Jf fl;r Attorney for State: ·f<../2'2-6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Change of Venue From:
_____

# ~-;'~,~~~j4-·-------- PUNISBMEHT FIXED BY**COUR~** OR JURY

Date of Judgment: 

## tlc fobf.'r 

# J.-3(9 'i 

## 3 Attorney for Defendant: ) Waived Counsel Offense: 

# A1 j I •1

## ~( ·1 

# I v 

## t-1 

# .f**I~)'"'** If' (

## ~1J \ 

## ·;

..iJ Date Offense
. IM"'··· I Degree: Committed: f" .,, - {!1 

## L/ / '113**------------------~~~--------------------------~~----------~--------en** Charging 

## -... Instrument:**Indictment/~Afe~atiap** (.n

Plea to Enhancement Paragraph( e): 

## ff 6 

### -f Findings on Enhancement:**~~~**
HATE Affirmative Findings: (Cin:le appropriat.eodccUon:... N/A =Dillavailable or DDl.q,plicab

DEADLY WEAPON: Yes :No /A) FAMILY VIOLENCE: Yes :No :(H/A , Date Sentencef\ll 1,-,r. 0. 

### '"'0...,**~** 1fV1 CT\ Punishment Imposed:
. 

## 6A.J0rd::**~** 

## ::Jt> 1/lfT) costs: 

## ·yl L'\...f ,:::t.J Assessed by: Punishment and 

## lt

## fe. Itu..-PYI SCll.fYlt2./1:{ /Fine <P Place of Confinement: 

### J0(::J ( D Date to 

## {Jf · e. r; 'f. Commence: 

### f_t{) '/V7.(**?~./1.** 

# . .. ",_;/'(. r

Time Credited:

### ~.3**~** 

## cLQ.t.,..

concurrent Unless Otherwia·e Total Amount of Restitution/Reparation/Reward:
Restitution/Reward o be Paid to:**Name:.~------~--~~----------~** Address:

__________**~---------------** Statement of Amount of Payment{&) required/Terms of**Amount=----------------,L------------~~** TbUo cauoe being c:allcd for trial. lhe StaLe appearedbylbe above named aaomcy, ODd lhe defcadallt**ap~** iJI penon inopen court, lbc abovJ named c.,......l for Ocfcndaalabobeing pn:K111, or wbcr:: • ckfcnd.an! ia ""' repr:..nted l,y**c~'Unsel,** lhe Dcfcnd.alllla!owingly. intcmeenlly, and voluntarily waived lhe right to**~q>n:acntation** by counsel u indicated above, ODd lbe aaid Defendantbovina beeoduly arnigncd ODd it appearingto the Court lbat Dcfcndalll waa mentally competent and baving pleaded u lhowu abOve to lhe cba!Jing instrumclll, bolb partia annoua&:ed """'fortrial and lbcn:upoa a jury,**~wit,** lhe above named f<mmaJ> and elcvcu olben·woa duly seleetcd, impaoelcd, ODd awom, thejurybovine beardlbe oba<Jing instrument read ODd lbe Defendant"aplea lbercto and baving bean! the evidcuce aubmincd ODd baviugbeeo duly obarJCd by the Court, Rliled iJ1 clwge oflbe proper offiCer to considerlbe verdict, and. aft.erward were brought into Court by the properoftker,theDcfendaatODd ckfendaat"a counsel, ifauy, beirlg prcacut, ODd I'CIUI1ICd into open court lbe verdict oct forth above, which waa received by lbe Court and ia here aow cnt.ercd uponlbc minuLea oflbe Court u ahowllobove. 0n
. \));

# t a.Joey
.. C:F6 ,19 

# Q**~** the o.rcndan1bavu.nn:viously ele<:Led to bave punilhmcnt aueaacd by the above

### ahowo aaaenorofplllliahmcnt, ODd when lbowo above lbat the oba'IPna imlnlmcutcOIIIainl cultaa&:emctit pangnoph(a), whieb were not waived ODd allegct Dcfcndanl to bavebeeoconvicted

__ 

## ·_J

__

w __

:'

__ <-.L

________ _,rcvioullyofany felony or offeaaeo for lbc purpoae of
enbanl:emelllofpunilhmcnt. the Court aaked Dcfeadanl ifweb aUegationa were true or faloc ODd Dcfcadant aJDWercd u abowa above. And when Defendant ia shOWD above to bave elecLed to have lbejiny ....,..puailhment, aueb.jury wu called baek intothe box ODd bean! evidcoc:e relative to lhe question ofpunilhmcnt and bavingbeen duly ebarged by lbe Court; they retired to coDJider aueb question and after bavia& dclibentcd lbey rclumed. into Court the verdictlhowa under punishiiiCDl above; and wbcn Defcndonl ia shOWD above to bave elected to bave puniahmcnllixal by the Court. iJI due form oftaw fUrther evidencewaa heard by lhe Court relative to the question ofpunishmcnl ODd the Courtr.X..S puniJhmcnl oflhe Dcfcadalltu showaabove.
. 

### 4 I 

# •

IT·IS. THEREFORE, CONSIDERED AND ORDERED by the Court. iJithe presence oflhe Dcfendont.lbat the aaidjudgmcut be and lhe aame is hereby iJI aU things approved ODd confirmed. ODd lbat lbe Defcndonl ia adjudaed guilty oflbe offenx aet forth above u found by lbc verdict ofthejury, and said Defcndonlbe punished iJI**acco~·tb** the Jill}' verdkt or lhe Court"o finding, u shown above and lbat lbe Defendonl ia aent.em:ed to a Lenn of impriaoruncnt**~** •'\''- or line or bolb. as aet forth abov •· lbat lhe aaid**~fcndanl**be cklivercd by the Sheriffto lbe Director oflhe Texaa Departmenl ofCriminal Juati<e, Institution Diviaioa, or other penon legally authorized 10 receive web**~nvicta** for lhe puniahmenl aaaeued herein, ODd lbe aaid**Defe~m** shall be confined f<?r the obove named term iJI accordaa&:e with the provisiona oflaw governing web punishmcnlll ODd execution may iuue as neceuary. Further, lhe court linda the Presentence lnveatigation, if 10 ordered, was done according to lhe applicablejnoviaioaa'ofArt. 41.12. Sec. 9, Code ofCrimiaal Procedure. AND lbe aaid DefcO.Illnl waa n:manded tojail until aaid Sheriffcan obey lbe directiona oflbiajud,.;.c.n.
Plea Before Jury

- Court/Jury Assessing Punisturient CRM-"4 Rl0-07-93 Page 1** TO BE COMPLETED ONLY WHEN IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE _SUSPENDED AND DEFENDANT GRANTED PROBATION• 

# .
••( I Ou lhia·lhe

------ day of -------'---'-----' 19_..---.....:... impolilionoflhia ICIIICDCe ilmipCIIdedand 

# ----· defendantia plaeed oo Adult Plobatioo for --'------.:.>·yeanpendU..biaabidUJa by_and
-**v~** lho tcrma and oonditiooa ofprobation,**~-.~** approvedby lhia court aad &lladied u a part oflhiajud,_..sbaewith.

BILL 0.-P C 0 S T. S Payment· Type:
__ (S, ';:--o,":-M-ar L:) (NOTE: If. •I•. or •o• see**attac~ed** order) 1 Jail Time:

_ B/D/M/Y**~-/H~ ~aYes**  N=N_o _(jail/fine/eclat concurrent) I Time Assessed Texas Department cf**Crimina1-.r~ce,Institutional** Div.:

_ D/M/YI Jail credit:

_ B/D/M/Y**Sentence~egin** Date: 1 Jail as a Term of Probation:

____ B/D/M/Y**Additional~il** Credit: _8/D/M/YI Payable on or Before: · PLO: Reward _SPR:·...., OOC: I Hours -of sentence to be Served by**Performing""~tnlnunity** Service : Defendant to Serve sentence by Electronic Monitoring? (Y or R): · ·. l NOTE TO SHERIFF: I Transcript at: Pages........
. I Crime Stoppers Fee••••••• ·I 2 I 001 serving Capiaaz

___ /Summonaz

___•• I Jury Fee••••••••**~........** I OJO lOCi I Sununoning

___ Witneaa/Mileage••••**~....** 

# s-k.X> CJPF· •••••••• , ...**~.......** 20 I 00 I Jury Fee
................ " •·• • • • .. • .. • .. 1 LEOSEF .••••••••••••••• • •• • 1 I SO I Takirig: Bonds••••**-~·-...............** I cVCF:**~--** ••••••••••••••• •... 

### aS>: 00I**C.;mmi.tme~**•.•**~** •••.•••**~** •••• ·• • • • • . . • • I DCLCF ••••• _. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I I Release• ••••••••• ·• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I JCTF••**~** •**~** •••••••••**-~** • • • • • • 1 I

.00 I Attachment·.••••**~** ••••••**~...............** I Video Fee••••••••••••••·•• J ·Arrest W/0 Warrant/Capias•••••• ·••••••• I DWI .Evaluation Pee....... l

-------------- RECAPITULATION

--------- -------- 1 Reward Repayment. • • • • • • • • I I Fine Amount••••••••••••**~-** •••·••••••••••• I Security Pee•••••••**~..... --5-j~OI**  Miscellaneous coats•••••••••;. •........ I Record11 Preservation Fee. --,16-f-66-l • 1 Judicial Fund Fee• ._.................... I ACCA •••••••••••••**~.......** I I
-

Special Expense•••••••••**~.............** I Financial Responsibility. c Trial Fee .•••••••••••••**~** •••••**~........** I I PTR Pee•••••••••••••••.•• District Attorney Fee•••••••••••·•••••• I I Attorney Fee•• • •••••••••• Clerk's Fee••**~........................** 40 1 001 Breath Alcohol**T~ating** ••• Sheriff's Fees (Total)................**~~()I** Rehabilitation Fund•••••• Misdemeanor Costa..................... I Amount Probated/Waived••• MAP Traffic coats..................... I TOTAL AMOuNT OWED ••••••••

signed and entered this the Notice of Appeal:- Probation Expires: Mandate Received: After Mandate Received, Sentence to Begin Date is: (OtocltONLY iC Applicable)
. ( I I • I I ( I I I

. I· (

## /01.~~-~

I I DcCcodanlto be plaeed in lhc**~S.A.I.P.**• (Boot Camp) programin lhc Tcxaa.DcpartmeatofCriminal Jullk:c, 'lnllituu.;,.l Diviaionpcnualllto Art. 62.03 (c)-9 Rcviaod Statu!co/.Micle 42.11, Scdioo 8, C.C.P. Received on _____ day of-----------------' A.D., 19

____ at Sheriff, Barris County, Texas

Verified.

________ _ -I**~--~-------------- ~~-4**  Rl0-07-93 -2- ------- o'clock

____ M.

Defendant's Right Thumbprint c c

### Cause No. 0659.15601010 

### The State ofTexas 

## v. LOWE, 

### ARTHUR DAVID a/k/a In the 339TH District Court or County Criminal Court at Law No.
__ Harris County, Texas
ENTRY OFJUDGMENT NUNC PRO TUNC 

### Today, the Court 

### held a hearing on 

### 0

. the State's written motion forjudgment nunc pro tunc.**~** 

### the Defendant's written motion forjudgment nunc pro tunc. 

### 0 its own motion. Satisfied from its own recollection and I 

### or from the evidence presented the Court 

### grants the motion and ORDERS entry ofthe following judgment in the minutes ofthe cburt 

### in the above styled and numbered case to make the following correction: 1-IOFFENSE FOR WHICH DEFENDANTCONVICTEDSHOULDREAD: AbGRAVATED KJDNAPPING RELEASE VICTIM IN A SAFE PLACE Cl00714) 2-IDEGREE OF OFFENSE SHOULD READ: 2N° DEGREE FELONY.



### f8l If applicable, the judgment nunc pro tunc supersedes the erroneous judgmentpreviously entered and attached.



# l !

### ..... 0 

## v.**LOWE,.~T** 

### 1URDAVID 

# I STATE ID No.: TX02465170 I 

### CASENo. 065915601010 INCIDENT

### NO./TRN: 9000184029-AOOI 

### ,,§ 

## § § 

### § § 

### § § 

### IN THE 339TH DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY,

### TExAs


## JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION BY JURY Judge Presiding: 

# I · HON. CAPRICE COSPER Date Judgment Entered: 

### 10/22/1993 I Attorney for Statej 

### DAN RIZZO Offense for which Defendant Convicted: Attorney for Defendant: 

### JIM RUST AGGRA VA!fED KIDNAPPING RELEASEVICTIM IN A 

### SAFE PLACE (100714) Charging Instrument: Statute for Offense: 

### INDICTMENT NIA**D~te** ofOffen§e: 

# I 3/4/1993 DeK!ee ofOffenseJ Plea to Offense: 

### 2ND DEGREE; FELONY NOT GUILTY Verdict ofJurv: 

# I Findine-s on Deadlv Weapon: 

### GUILTY N/A Plea to 151 Enhanc4ment Plea to 2"d Enhancement/Habitual Paragraph: 

## I NOT TRUE Paragraph: 

### NOT TRUE Findings on 1•• Enhancement Findings on 2nd Paragraph: 

## I TRUE EnhancementiHabitual Paragraph: 

### TRUE Punished As§gssed bv: Date Sentence Imposed: Dat;g Sentence to Commence: 

### JURY 

## I 10/2811993**~** 

### 10/28/1993 ' Punishment and Place 

### LIFE INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, TDCJ ofConfinement: 

## I 1\


# II ' 

# l l l i l ! 

## l 1 1 j 

# l l 

### ! J 

# I

.I THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN 

### CONCURRENTLY. 

# ll 0**SENTEN~E** OF CONFINEMENT SUSPENDED, DEFENDANT PLACED ON COMMUNITYSUPERVISION FOR N/A 1.1 Fine: 

# I Court Costs: Restitution: Restitution Pavable to: 

# ! 

# I $ 

### N/A $ 

### 134.50 $ NIA 

### 0 VICTIM (see below) 

### 0 AGENCY/AGENT (see**!;>~low)** Sex Offender Re!Pstration Requirements do not apply to the Defendant. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. chapter_62. J The age ofthe victJn at the time ofthe offense was

### N/A
. J

to 10/28/1993 From 

### rtn 3/12/1993 to &:!Time**~Credited:** 00 0\ 0\ to From to 

## I From to From to



### I

. IfDefendant is to serve sentence in county jail or is given credittoward fine and costo:;. enter days credited below.

## ~~--~~-2~3~!~D_A~Y~S--~N~O~TE~S~:~T~O~W~A~R~D~IN~CAR~-C~E•R•A•T-IO~N~,-F~I~N-E~,AND_.~C~O~S-T_S~~~~~--**~** All**pertinen~"nformation.** names and assessments indieated above are incorporated iDto the language ofthejudgment below b)· referen'cb.

### ~ This ca was called for trial in Harris County, Texas. The State appeared by herDistrictAttorney. )**~** Counsel/Waiver ofCounsel (select one) 

### j E 

## 181 Defendant**ap~ared** in person with Counsel. 

### l

### ~ 

## 0 Defendant k.n?wingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to representation by counsel in writing in open

### cour~ g Itappeared to the Court thatDefendantwas mentally competent and had pleaded as shown above to the charging J 0**~nstrument.** Both

## I parties announced ready for trial. Ajury was selected, i_mpaneled, and sworn. Th_e I!\!TIICTMEI\TT was**re~** · to the 

### 13 JUry, and Defendahtentered a plea to the charged offense.·The Courtreceived the plea and entered Itofrecord. j**~** 

### l 

# l 

# I U F-Convictiou byJury wilb TDC checklist_OG5915401010_3.dacm Pnr,:e I ofS • 

# I

## .,.,

....... 0 .,

--· ._ 

# __....... d**;.~"'** '

## ~-~-**T~e-j** heard the evidence submitted and argumentofcounseL The Court charged thejury as to its duty to dete

## i~e ihe guilt or innocenc ofDefendant, and thejucyretired to consider the evidence. Upon returning to open court, thejucy deliver.! d its ve.'dict in the pnlsence ofDefendant and defense counsel, ifany. ' 

## j

.. The CoJ.-t received the verdict and ORDERED it entered upon the minutes ofthe Court. i . '

### Punish~ent Assessed hy Jury I Court_I No

### eleo~ion (select

### o~e) . . . 

# I

.**~** JIJlry. Defendantentered a plea and filed a wntten election to have the JUr')' assess pu•1lsh-ent. T.beJ1ll'Yheard eYldenu
. .otive to the question ofpJnishment. The Court charged thejury anditretired to consider the question ofpunishment. After due**delib~~a**tion, theju1-y was broJghtinto Court, and, in open court, it·returned its verdictas indicated above.. 

## j 0 Court. Defer 1dantelected**~** have the**~u~** assesspunishment. Afterhearingevidence relative to the question of**punish~** nt, the Court assessed D fendant's purushment as mdicated above.

- j 

### 0 No Election. Defendant did notfile a written election as to whether thejudge orjury should assess punishment. After**hea~·**g evidence relative to the question ofpunishment, the Court assessed Defendant'spunishment as indicated above. 

# I The Cou ·t FINDS Defendantcommitted the above offense and ORDERS.ADJUDGES Al\T]) DECREES thatDefeo ant is GUlL TYofthe jbove offense. The Court FINDS the Presentence Investigation, 

### ifso ordered, was done according to the

# app~ able provisions ofTE:d CODE CRIM. PRoc. art. 42.12 § 9. 

### j The**Co~** ORDERS Defendant punished as indicated above. The Court ORDERS Defendantto pay all fines, court cos , and restitution as indicated above.
.

### l~ PunishJnent Options (select one) · 

## j l8J**Confineme~t** in State Jail or Institutional Division. The Court ORDERS the authorized agent ofthe State ofTexas,

# r the Sheriffofthis County to take, safely convey, and deliver Defendant to the Director, Institutional Division, TDCJ. The**C~urt** ORDERS Defendart to be confined for the period and in the mamier indicated above. The Court ORDERS Defendantremande1 to the custody ofthe Sheriffofthis county until the Sheriffcan obey the directions ofthis sentence. The Court ORDERS that upon

# t lease from confinemenf. Defendantproceed immediately to the Harris County District Clerk's office. Once there, the Court

# o: DERS Defendant to paYI1 1

, or make an·angements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the C.·rurt above. 

# l 0 County Jnii

### 1 Confinernent I Confinement in Lieu ofPayment. The Court ORDERS Defendantimmediately commi,tfed to the custody ofthe SheriffofHarris County, Texas on the date the sentence is to commence. Defendant shall be confined · the Harris County**~ail** for the period indicated above. The Court ORDERS that upon release from confinement, Defendant sha proceed immediately to the Harris County District Clerk's office. Once there, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pay, or

### rei ke an·angements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. 

## I 0 Fine Only Pryment. The punishment assessed against Defendant isfor a FINE ONLY. The Court ORDERS Defendant

## tb proceed immediately to**t~e** Office ofthe Harris County
. Once there, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pay ormake arrangemenfl o pay all fines and cou'f costs as ordered bythe Courtin this cause. . 

## j Execution I Suspension ofSentence (select one)
. ·1 

### 181 The Court**O~DERS** Defendant's sentence EXECUTED. · · 

### 0 The Court**O~DERS** Defendant's sentence ofconfinementSUSPENDED. The Court ORDERS Defendantplaced on communit supervision for tlie adjudged period (above) so long as Defendant abides by and dties not violate the terms and conditions of 

### l community**supe~sion.** The order setting forth the terms and conditions ofcommunity supervision is incorporated into thisj judgmentby reference. The Cour 1 ORDERS that Defendantis given credit noted above on this sentence for the time spentincarcerated. 

# I

· Furthermore, the following special findings ororders apply: 1 Signed and 1 ntered on 10/28/13 

### X JliDGEPRES
"<t Notice ofAppeal Filed: 10/28/1993 · 

# l

. 

# r Mandate Received: 6/28/1995_Type of.Mandate: AFFIRMANCE- iST COURT OFAPPEALS \0 00**~** After Mandate Received. Sentence to Begin Date is: 10/28/1993


# - ·:g Jail Credit: 232 D YS CREDIT \0 kj ,rJ 

# s z ' 

## c Def. Receivedon_i-

__________at
___ 

## 0 AM 

## 0 PM

# ~ By:

# ------7~-----------. Deputy SheriffofHarris County 

## 8 

# ;GUEVl ENIKR04:

___ LCBT:

__ _

. F--Con\oiction byJul')" ,.;o.h TDC checldist_OG5915401010_3.clocm Right Thumbprint

LCBU:

__ _ ENIKR18:

__ _ Pa,.ro 2 of3

### vs. 

# I**'~** CADSE NO. 6591.56 i
I J .'-'

ARi'BDB DAVID LOWE Dl 'fJIE 339ft DZSBl:C!f OOIIR!l' or JWUUS CXJm1'.l'Y, t".DASADGUS'f 'fBBit, A. D., 1993

SPECIAL ISSUE
Now, if you have ifound tbe Defendant -guilty of aggravated I kidnapping, as _defineq in this**~ge.-** L'Dtl only in that event,**y~u** aust deteaaine vf'etber or ·aot tbe .defendant voluntarily released tbe victUa alive and -in a safe place9


### ! Do you the .Jury f+Dd tbe**defe~t** vol.unt:arUy re1eased tbe victia al.ive ·aDd· in 

### Ia safe place, in the COP"'iss.ioo of the offense for vhicb be baa been convicted?**VERDI~**
We, tbe jury, ret
.. rn in opeo eourt**~ ~**  aaawer as 011r answer tC? the special, +sane sublaitted to us, an4 tbe 

### saae· iS our verdict in this case.


## I 

## piLBDi

. 1CA1'BIIltJNB 1'DA

-·**···--t~**



## .... 0Cl2} 

### ,....

# CHRIS DANIEL HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK 

### December 22, 2014 ARTHUR DAVID LOWE, JR. #669750 HUGHES UNIT ROUTE 2 BOX 4400 GATESVILLE, TEXAS 76597 RE: CAUSE #659154-B 339th District Court Dear Applicant: Your post conviction application for Writ ofHabeas Corpus was received and filed on 12-22-14. Article 11.07 ofthe Texas code ofCriminal Procedure affords the State 15 days in which to answer the application after having been served with said application. After the 15 days allowed the State to answer the application, the Court has 20 days in which it may order the designation ofissues to be resolved, ifany. Ifthe Court has not entered an order designating issues to be resolved within 35 days after the State having been served with the application, the application will be forwarded to the Court ofCriminal Appeals for their consideration pursuant to Article 11.07, Sec. 3 (c) ofthe Texas Code ofCriminal Procedure. The records ofthe office reflect the following: 

### CAUSE NO. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISPOSITION 659154-A 12-18-13 DENIED All future correspondence should indicate the above listed cause number.

Leslie emandez, Dep Criminal Post Trial CC: District Attorney Judge, Presiding Court

120I FRANKLIN • P.O. BOX 4651 • HOUSTON, TEXAS 77210-4651 PAGE I OF I REV. 01-02-04i >.

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS WR-25,679-22; CAUSE No.659154-B EX PARTE ARTHUR DAVID LOWE Applicant, § IN THE 339TH DISTRICT COURT



### v. §
THE**ST~TE** OF TEXAS, § REPRESENTATIVE(s), ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY(s). Respondant(s).· § ORDER OF
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

MOTION FOR**R~CONSIDERATION** BE IT REMEMBER, that on this day came to be considered that Applicant's 'Motion For Reconsideration'. After considering the pleading herein and the evidence presented, the Court is of the Opinion that the following Order should issue: It is hereby ORDERED that the Applicant's 'Motion' is GRANTED DENIED



### r THE PRESIDING· JUSTICE (CCA).



### ,.