alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012070EN.01001901.xml

| 8.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/19

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 March 2012

2012/C 70/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3120 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 105,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4345 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83490 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9240 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2052 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,871 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6978 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1644 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3580 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3459 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2423 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3140 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1858 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6043 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6554 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 476,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0432 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2855 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5588 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 037,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9714 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,370 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,0299 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,370 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3209 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0308 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,1310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3120

JPY

Japanese yen

105,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4345

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83490

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9240

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2052

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,871

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6978

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1644

RON

Romanian leu

4,3580

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3459

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2423

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3140

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1858

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6043

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6554

KRW

South Korean won

1 476,91

ZAR

South African rand

10,0432

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2855

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5588

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 037,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9714

PHP

Philippine peso

56,370

RUB

Russian rouble

39,0299

THB

Thai baht

40,370

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3209

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0308

INR

Indian rupee

66,1310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 21
 Subsidiaries of Registrant
 State of
    
    PercentageCompany Name
    
    Incorporation
    
    OwnershipCICA Life Insurance Company of America (CICA)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% DirectCitizens Academy, LLC
    
    Texas
    
    100% DirectCitizens National Life Insurance Company (CNLIC)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectComputing Technology, Inc.
(CTI)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% IndirectFuneral Homes of America, Inc.
(FHA)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% IndirectInsurance Investors, Inc. (III)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectIntegrity Capital Corporation (ICC)
    
    Indiana
    
    87% Direct
13% IndirectIntegrity Capital Insurance Company
(ICIC)
    
    Indiana
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Life Insurance Company (SPLIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Fire Insurance Company (SPFIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% Indirect
# C_2011365EN.01000301.xml

| 15.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 December 2011

2011/C 365/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2993 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 101,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4326 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83900 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0852 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2317 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7660 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,649 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6973 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5607 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3450 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4467 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3023 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3475 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1126 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7254 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6975 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 505,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,8569 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2659 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5030 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 953,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1419 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,435 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,3100 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,642 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4275 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0475 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,0780 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2993

JPY

Japanese yen

101,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,4326

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83900

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0852

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2317

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7660

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,649

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6973

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5607

RON

Romanian leu

4,3450

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4467

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3023

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3475

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1126

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7254

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6975

KRW

South Korean won

1 505,57

ZAR

South African rand

10,8569

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2659

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5030

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 953,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1419

PHP

Philippine peso

57,435

RUB

Russian rouble

41,3100

THB

Thai baht

40,642

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4275

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0475

INR

Indian rupee

70,0780

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
From: Szabo, Aaron [ mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 2:36 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Cc: Jordan, Scott; Eck, Janet; Barnett, Keith; VanLare, Paula

Subject: Re: EO 12866_Brick Clay 2060_AP69 Final Submittal

Sharon,

You can upload the documents to ROCIS. Please let me know when they have been uploaded.

Thank you very much.

From: Nizich, Sharon

Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 12:57 PM

To: 'Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov'

Cc: Jordan, Scott; Eck, Janet; Barnett, Keith; VanLare, Paula

Subject: EO 12866_Brick Clay 2060_AP69 Final Submittal

Hello Aaron

Please find attached the final submittal for ROCIS along with the compare version between

08/24/2015 version and today, for subject rule.

Also note I am sending you the compare version of the RIA, between the 08/24/2015 submittal to

you, and the final we completed today.

Thank you.

Sharon Nizich

Environmental Engineer

U.S. EPA/OAR/OAQPS

Se ctor Policies and Programs Division (SPPD)

109 TW Alexander Dr. (D243

- 04)

RTP, NC 27711

(919) 541

- 2825

<< E O 12866_Brick Clay 2060

- AP69 RIA Final_Compare_2015 09 23.docx>>

<< E O 12866_Brick Clay 2060

- AP69 Compare_20150923.docx>>

<< E O 12866_Brick Clay 2060

- AP69_ROCIS Clean Copy 9 23 2015.docx>>
#### PAN-AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellant, v. Manuel Garcia FUENTES, Appellee. Manuel Garcia FUENTES, Appellant, v. PAN-AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellee.

Nos. 70-74, 70-206, 70-207.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1971.

James A. Dixon, of Dixon, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, and Sam Daniels, Miami, for Pan-American Life Ins. Co.

Donald J. Sasser, of Law Offices of Ronald Sales, Palm Beach, for Manuel Garcia Fuentes.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

By a petition for rehearing the appel-lee points out that the opinion of this court issued 12 March 1971, Fla.App., 258 So.2d 8, in the third paragraph, incorrectly refers to the date of issuance of the insurance policy to appellee’s father as “8 September 1966” whereas the date should have been “8 September 1946”. The appellee is correct, and the opinion is hereby modified to show the date of issuance of the policy as “8 September 1946” instead of “8 September 1966”. Except as otherwise stated the opinion formerly issued is adhered to, and the petition for rehearing is denied.

WALDEN and REED, JJ., and DRIVER, B. J., Associate Judge, concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

CANDELARIO GONZALEZ-GARCIA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50401 

D.C. No. 3:14-cr-00021-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 13, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Candelario Gonzalez-Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 72-month sentence imposed upon remand following his guilty-plea 

conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 

and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 16 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-50401 

Gonzalez-Garcia argues for the first time on appeal that the government 

breached the terms of the parties’ plea agreement by failing to honor its promise to 

advocate for a minor role adjustment at sentencing. The government argues that 

Gonzalez-Garcia waived this claim. We decline to decide whether GonzalezGarcia waived his breach claim because, even if merely forfeited, Gonzalez-Garcia

cannot show plain error.1 See United States v. Whitney, 673 F.3d 965, 970 (9th 

Cir. 2012). Any breach by the government did not affect Gonzalez-Garcia’s 

substantial rights. See United States v. Gonzalez-Aguilar, 718 F.3d 1185, 1187 

(9th Cir. 2013). The record reflects that the district court understood the arguments 

in favor of a minor role adjustment, but did not find them convincing and would 

not have granted the reduction even if the government had argued for it more 

strenuously. Furthermore, the record reflects that, even if the court had been 

convinced to grant a minor role adjustment, it would not have imposed a lower 

sentence. Under these circumstances, there is no reasonable probability that the 

alleged breach affected the court’s sentencing determination. See id. at 1188-89.

AFFRIMED.

 

1 Though we need not decide whether the government breached the plea 

agreement, we do not approve of its lukewarm support for its joint

recommendation for a minor role adjustment as contemplated by the plea 

agreement.
# C_2012092EN.01001001.xml

| 29.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/10

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.6201 — HSH/Malév)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 92/07

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 8 March 2012, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between HSH and Malév. On 22 March 2012, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.65 **Contact:**  Samantha O’NeilPublic Information Office
(202) 450-9556
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, APRIL 8, 2010 Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to Baltimore Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why “I count!” and view messages from other road tour participants.
    
 For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
EXHIBIT 23
GHASSEMI, PHOEL & COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
23 Langdon Place
Lynbrook, NY 11563
Phone:    516-887-4444
Fax:      516-887-4450


Board of Directors and Shareholders
Datatab, Inc.

The examination referred to in our opinion dated February 28, 2002 of the
financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and for each of the three years
then ended included the related supplemental financial schedules as listed in
Item 11(a)2, which, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements, presents fairly in all material respects the information shown
therein.


/S/ GHASSEMI, PHOEL & CO.
-----------------------------
Certified Public Accountants

Lynbrook, New York
February 28, 2002





<PAGE>
#### ROBERT PAGE CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. FIRST ASSOCIATES CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-594.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 22, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James F. Minnet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Document

Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


    This FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between Taylor Morrison, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Sheryl D. Palmer (the “Executive”), effective as of July 26, 2022.


    WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive previously entered into that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of October 12, 2021 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


    WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.


    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual promises, terms, provisions, and conditions set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereby agree as follows, effective as of the date hereof:


1.Modification of Company Obligations upon Termination of Employment.  Section 5(b) of the Employment Agreement (Termination without Cause or Resignation with Good Reason) is amended by adding a new subsection (v) that reads as follows:


“(v)    if such termination is a CIC Qualifying Termination, then the Company shall pay the Executive a prorated portion of the annual profit sharing program bonus payable with respect to the calendar year in which such termination occurs, determined on a daily basis, based solely on the actual level of achievement of the applicable performance goals for such year, and payable if and when annual profit sharing program bonuses are paid to other senior executives of the Company with respect to such year;”


2.Except as set forth in this Amendment, all terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.


3.Section 13 (Governing Law) and Section 21 (Dispute Resolution) of the Employment Agreement are incorporated by reference, mutatis mutandis, as though fully set forth herein. 


4.This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts (and may be delivered  by facsimile or in portable document format (.pdf)), each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the Company by its duly authorized representative, and by the Executive, as of the date first above written.


EXECUTIVE                        TAYLOR MORRISON, INC.




/s/ Sheryl D. Palmer                          By: /s/ Darrell C. Sherman
Sheryl D. Palmer                          Name:  Darrell Sherman    
                                  Title: EVP, Chief Legal Officer
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Fourth Quarter 1999 and 1998

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     Fourth quarter 1999
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.8        8.0       11.7
      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.0        0.9        1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.7        0.7        0.7
      Held off market.....................       4.5        3.7        7.6
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        3.3
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.1        1.7        3.5

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.6        1.5        6.9

    Occupied..............................      88.6       90.5       81.5



                                                     Fourth quarter 1998
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.9        8.3       11.4
      For rent............................       2.5        2.6        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.1        1.0        1.2
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.8        0.7
      Held off market.....................       4.6        3.8        7.4
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        3.0
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.9
        For other reasons.................       2.2        1.9        3.5

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.6        1.5        6.8

    Occupied..............................      88.5       90.3       81.8
#### Diana ADLINGTON, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 77-599.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 25, 1977.

*1149Martin J. Schwartz, Hollywood, Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Miami, for petitioner.

Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty. and John P. Durant, Asst. State Atty., for respondent.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner-cross-respondent, defendant in the trial court and appellant in the circuit court, seeks issuance of a writ of certiorari directed to an order of the circuit court which, *inter alia,*affirmed her conviction for petit larceny (shoplifting).

Respondent-cross-petitioner, prosecution in the trial court and appellee in the circuit court, has cross-petitioned this court to quash a portion of that same order which reversed petitioner-cross-respondent’s conviction for resisting arrest without violence.

Petitioner-cross-respondent was charged with the crimes of petit larceny, in violation of Section 812.021, Florida Statutes (1975); resisting arrest without violence, in violation of Section 843.02 Florida Statutes (1975); and reckless driving, in violation of Section 316.029, Florida Statutes (1975).

After pleading not guilty to all three charges, the case proceeded to non-jury trial in the county court. At the conclusion of the trial, petitioner-cross-respondent was found guilty on all three charges, fined $250.00 on each charge and sentenced to 30 days each on the shoplifting and resisting arrest convictions, sentences to run consecutively. On appeal, the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity affirmed both the reckless driving1 and shoplifting convictions. The resisting arrest without force conviction was reversed on the ground that no probable cause existed at the time to arrest petitioner-cross-respondent, thus making the arrest illegal.

Having carefully considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel it is our opinion that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in affirming petitioner-cross-respondent’s conviction for petit larceny in that respondent-cross-petitioner failed to prove the requisite ownership or superior possession of the alleged stolen property in one other than petitioner-cross-respondent. *Simkovitz v. State,*340 So.2d 959 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); *Johnson v. State,*190 So.2d 601 (Fla.3d DCA 1966).

As for the cross-petition for certiorari directed to that portion of the order which reversed petitioner-cross-respondent’s conviction for resisting arrest without violence, no departure from the essential requirements of law has been shown.

Accordingly, the petition for certio-rari is hereby granted and the petit larceny conviction is quashed. Cross-petition for certiorari is denied.

Petition for certiorari granted; cross-petition denied.

1

. The reckless driving conviction is not a part of this petition for certiorari and as such, will not be reviewed by this court.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.11 **Contact:**  Kamille Davis
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, JAN. 27, 2010 Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to Super Bowl Event in Miami Beach Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why "I count!" and view messages from other road tour participants.
    
 For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy