alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table with row headers in column A and column headers in rowd 5-7 (leading dots indicate sub parts).,,,,,,,Table 3. Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder: 2016 Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey,,,,,,,              and 2016 American Community Survey,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Age of Householder,2016 CPS/HVS,,2016 ACS ,,Difference CPS/HVS     vs ACS,Margin of Error of Difference,Difference Statistically Significant?,,,,,,,,Estimate,Margin of Error,Estimate,Margin of Error,,,,,,,,,,"United States, total....................",63.4,0.5,63.1,0.1,0.3,0.5, No   .Less than 25 years....................,21.9,1.1,12.9,0.3,9.0,1.1,Yes   .25 to 34 years...........................,38.6,0.7,37.0,0.3,1.6,0.8,Yes   .35 to 44 years...........................,58.6,1.0,56.4,0.3,2.2,1.0,Yes   .45 to 54 years...........................,69.3,0.6,68.1,0.2,1.2,0.7,Yes   .55 to 59 years..........................,74.0,0.5,73.5,0.2,0.5,0.6, No   .60 to 64 years..........................,76.1,0.5,76.0,0.2,0.1,0.6, No   .65 to 74 years..........................,80.1,0.7,79.4,0.2,0.8,0.7,Yes   .75 years and over...................,77.0,0.9,75.9,0.2,1.1,0.9,Yes,,,,,,,     .Less than 35 years....................,34.5,0.6,32.2,0.2,2.3,0.7,Yes     .35 to 54 years........................,64.2,0.7,62.6,0.2,1.6,0.7,Yes     .55 to 64 years.........................,75.0,0.4,74.7,0.1,0.3,0.4, No     .65 years and over..................,78.8,0.6,77.9,0.1,0.9,0.6,Yes,,,,,,,Foonotes:,,,,,,,"Internet Release Date: October 31, 2017",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.0

                            COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                          ----------------------------------------------------
                                            2000       1999       1998       1997       1996
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Interest Expense........................  $100,300   $ 55,200   $101,900   $ 90,400   $142,100
Capitalized Interest....................     3,946         --         --         --         --
Estimated Interest Portion of Rent
  Expense...............................    15,614     13,948     12,352     10,864     10,035
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Fixed Charges...........................  $119,860   $ 69,148   $114,252   $101,264   $152,135
                                          ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Income From Continuing Operations Before
  Income Taxes..........................  $549,900   $518,600   $523,600   $483,200   $470,700
Add:  Fixed Charges.....................   115,914     69,148    114,252    101,264    152,135
      Dividends From Less Than 50% Owned
      Companies.........................        --         --         --         --        287
Less: Equity in (Earnings) Losses of
      Less Than 50% Owned Companies.....    (3,367)    (1,069)       595       (320)    (1,609)
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Earnings Before Fixed Charges...........  $662,447   $586,679   $638,447   $584,144   $621,513
                                          ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges......    5.5x       8.5x       5.6x       5.8x       4.1x
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                      

                       

<ARTICLE>                        UT

<LEGEND>                         The schedule contains summary financial
                                 information extracted from Consolidated
                                 Balance Sheet, Income Statement and
                                 Statement of Cash Flows and is qualified
                                 in its entirety by reference to such financial
                                 statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

       
<S>                              <C>  

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                     Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-Mos

<BOOK-VALUE>                     Per-Book

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>        11,267,102

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>         292,397

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>            1,527,210

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            662,730

<OTHER-ASSETS>                      973,079

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   14,722,518

<COMMON>                            588,724

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           856,652

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>               4,484,703

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>    5,930,079

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                84,550

<PREFERRED>                         233,468

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>              4,188,906

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                     0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>              0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>         0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>       529,385

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>              0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>          39,879

<LEASES-CURRENT>                      2,768

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>    3,713,483

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>    14,722,518

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>         7,121,254

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                382,910

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        5,692,956

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        6,075,866

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>           1,045,388

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                      496

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>    1,045,884

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>            333,061

<NET-INCOME>                        712,823

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>          18,344

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       694,479

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            493,711

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>           318,158

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>            1,238,540

<EPS-PRIMARY>                          2.95

<EPS-DILUTED>                          2.95

        


</TABLE>
EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 SEE REVERSE FOR IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS AND CERTAIN OTHER INFORMATION CUSIP 01021X 10 0 SEE
REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COMMON STOCK 0000001 RIADH ZINE, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SPECIMEN FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK
IS THE OWNER OF $0.01 PAR VALUE, OF AKUMIN INC. THIS CERTIFIES THAT transferable on the books of the Company in Person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate and the shares represented
hereby, are issued and shall be held subject to all of the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, as it may be amended, and the Bylaws, as they may be amended, of the Company (copies of which are on file with the Company and with the
Transfer Agent), to all of which each holder, by acceptance hereof, assents. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers. ROHIT NAVANI, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT TSX TRUST COMPANY, CO-AGENT COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY {New York, N.Y.)
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 











 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- Custodian TENENT—as tenants by the entireties
(cust) (Minor) IT TEN -as joint tenants with right of under Uniform Gifts to Minors survivorship and not as tenants Act- in common (State) TIEE -trustee under Agreement
dated _ Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND
ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE. Shares of the common stock represented by this certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint    attorney, to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named
corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. DATED    NOTICE; The    signature to this assignment must correspond with the name aa written upon the face of the certificate In every particular
without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED: THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTUTION, (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TOS.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB09-CN.09 **Contact:**  Lisa Cochrane
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JUNE 25, 2009 Census Bureau Opens Data Processing Center in Maryland New 2010 Census facility will create thousands of area jobs The U.S. Census Bureau today  opened one of three data capture centers that will process the 2010 Census  questionnaires as they are mailed back by households across the nation. The  236,500-square-foot facility will bring more than 2,500 jobs to Baltimore  County, Md. "Processing the 2010  Census questionnaires accurately and safely at the data capture centers is a  crucial step to a successful census," said Census Bureau Acting Director Tom  Mesenbourg.  "The data from each form  processed at the facility will help provide a complete count of the nation's  population and a new portrait of America." The Baltimore Data Capture Center is  expected to process about 40 percent of the census forms mailed back by  respondents. The remaining forms will be sent to the Census Bureau's National  Processing Center in Jeffersonville, Ind., and the data capture center in  Phoenix, which is set to open in November. The 2010 Census forms will be mailed  in March, and the majority of the data processing will occur between March and  July. The Baltimore Data  Capture Center will be managed by Lockheed Martin. Its subcontractor partner,  CSC, will manage the hiring efforts for the 2,500 new employees, most of whom  will be hired starting in December of this year. Each worker will take an oath  for life to keep census information confidential. By law, the Census Bureau  cannot share respondents' answers with any other government or law enforcement  agency. Any violation of that oath is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000  and five years in prison. The 2010 Census is a count of  everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution.  Census data are used to distribute congressional seats to states and to  allocate more than $435 billion in federal funds to local, state and tribal  governments each year. The 2010 Census questionnaire will be one of the  shortest in history, consisting of 10 questions and taking about 10 minutes to  complete.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Wilbert P. MOORE v. A. C. SUHREN HOUMA CORP. et al.

No. 9048.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Nov. 13, 1972.

Henry L. Klein (Windhorst, Heisler, deLaup & Wysocki), New Orleans, for appellant.

Wood Brown, III (Montgomery, Barnett, Brown & Read), New Orleans, for appellees.

Before LOTTINGER, ELLIS and PETERS, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

■This is a workmen’s compensation case in which plaintiff Wilbert P. Moore is claiming to be permanently and totally disabled as the result of an injury to his left thumb. Defendants are A. C. Suhren Houma Corporation, his employer, and Casualty Reciprocal Exchange Insurance Company, its insurer. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff injured his left thumb in the course and scope of his employment as a small engine mechanic on August 27, 1970. He was treated by his family physician and continued on his job in a supervisory capacity until November 18, 1970. On October 23, 1970, he was seen by Dr. E. J. Da-bezies, an orthopedist. On November 20, 1970, a fusion of the metacarpal phalangeal joint of the left thumb was performed by Dr. Dabezies.

*477On January 18, 1971, Dr. Dabezies told plaintiff he could return to light work, with no stress on the left hand. By April 12, 1971, the doctor was of the opinion that plaintiff could return to full duty. Because of the loss in mobility due to the fusion of the joint, Dr. Dabezies estimated a 50% loss of use of the thumb. He was of the opinion that there was no pain in the joint. He stated that plaintiff could return to duty as a mechanic, although he would have to make some adaptive changes in the manner in which he did his work.

Plaintiff testified that he tried on two occasions to return to work, and was unable to do so. The main complaint was one of pain and swelling in the joint of the thumb after he had worked for some time. He demonstrated to the court his alleged inability to perform a number of tasks which he testified prevented him from fully performing the duties of his occupation.

Defendants rely on the principle that, when there is no conflict in the medical testimony, lay evidence will not be considered. They point out that the only two witnesses to testify were plaintiff and Dr. Dabezies, and that plaintiff’s testimony, uncorroborated, can not prevail.

Plaintiff relies for his corroborative evidence on the demonstrations conducted before the court. We note, however, that plaintiff was not unable to do these things. He simply demonstrated the tasks and then testified that doing them caused pain after some time. A demonstration of this type can be accorded no more weight than plaintiff’s testimony, and is not corroborative thereof.

The trial judge heard and saw plaintiff, and, after reading Dr. Dabezies’ deposition, rejected plaintiff’s testimony and adopted that of Dr. Dabezies. We can find no manifest error in his conclusion in this respect.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed, at plaintiff’s cost.

Affirmed.
#### Jacob SLAFIT et al., Appellants, v. LEO-JAMES BAYVIEW CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-729.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 20, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40754

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALFREDO FLORES-BUSTAMANTE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:10-CR-28-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alfredo FloresBustamante has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores-Bustamante has not filed a response. We have

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40754 Document: 00511515115 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2011
No. 10-40754

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-40754 Document: 00511515115 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2011
#### HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICE CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, d/b/a Plantation General Hospital, Appellant, v. Mary A. CILIO and Carmelo Cilio, Appellees.

No. 71-33.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stephen R. Bo'oher, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 11385.

#### Vulgamore, Jr., *v.*Daily.

Decided December 7, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Pike county.

*Messrs. Dougherty & Moore,*for *530plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Eylar ,& Douglas,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.
# 331
# C_2011348EN.01000501.xml

| 29.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 November 2011

2011/C 348/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3348 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,82 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4375 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85820 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2597 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2309 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8355 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,757 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,91 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6970 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5153 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3660 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4817 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3435 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3802 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4038 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7694 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7338 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 539,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1555 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5215 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4985 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 183,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2420 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,392 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,7500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,806 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4877 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7413 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,4560 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3348

JPY

Japanese yen

103,82

DKK

Danish krone

7,4375

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85820

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2597

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2309

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8355

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,757

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,91

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6970

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5153

RON

Romanian leu

4,3660

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4817

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3435

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3802

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4038

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7694

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7338

KRW

South Korean won

1 539,49

ZAR

South African rand

11,1555

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5215

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4985

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 183,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2420

PHP

Philippine peso

58,392

RUB

Russian rouble

41,7500

THB

Thai baht

41,806

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4877

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7413

INR

Indian rupee

69,4560

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128350 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128350 COA: 250908 Wayne CC: 03-006261-01 LEWYN FLOYD RODGERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
# C_2012103EN.01000301.xml

| 11.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2012/C 103/03

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by France

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by France

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: France

Subject of commemoration: The 100th anniversary of the birth of the Abbé Pierre, famous in France as protector of the Poor

Description of the design: The coin depicts a portrait of the Abbé Pierre, with its béret, and the logo of its foundation, with a microtext mentioning ‘Et les autres?’ which was its favorite motto to recall that one should never forget to help the others. The letters ‘RF’ do appear for ‘République française’ together with the horn of plenty, mintmark of Monnaie de Paris on the left side, and the ‘fleurette’, hallmark of the engraving workshop on the right side.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 1 million

Date of issue: July 2012

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---