alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012010EN.01000101.xml

| 12.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 January 2012

2012/C 10/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2718 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 97,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4363 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82590 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8087 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2120 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6505 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,821 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6982 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4609 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3670 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3671 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2361 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2928 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8792 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6016 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6441 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 476,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3476 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0304 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5390 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 649,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9935 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,881 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3375 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,469 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2937 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3728 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,9620 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2718

JPY

Japanese yen

97,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4363

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82590

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8087

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2120

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6505

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,821

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6982

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4609

RON

Romanian leu

4,3670

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3671

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2361

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2928

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8792

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6016

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6441

KRW

South Korean won

1 476,82

ZAR

South African rand

10,3476

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0304

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5390

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 649,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9935

PHP

Philippine peso

55,881

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3375

THB

Thai baht

40,469

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2937

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3728

INR

Indian rupee

65,9620

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012307EN.01002101.xml

| 11.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/21

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2012/C 307/07

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising an open competition:

EPSO/AST/122/12 — Proofreaders/Language editors (AST 3) with Croatian as their main language (HR)

The competition notice is published in English, French and German only, in Official Journal C 307 A of 11 October 2012.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
#### John F. SANCHEZ v. TRUSTEES OF the PENSION PLAN, etc., et al. Louis DE JOHN v. TRUSTEES OF the PENSION PLAN, etc., et al.

No. 61465.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Trustees of the Pension Plan, Health & Welfare Plan and Education Fund of the United Association of Journeymen, et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 353 So.2d 327.

*1385Granted. It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30909

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TONY EARNEST WASHINGTON,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CR-20059

- - - - - - - - - -

July 25, 1996

Before KING, JOLLY and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tony Earnest Washington appeals his guilty-plea conviction

for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. He argues

that 1) the district court should not have considered his

statement to sheriff's deputies at sentencing because the

statement was unreliable; 2) the district court failed to comply

with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(1), which requires the district court

to rule on any unresolved objections to the presentence report
No. 95-30909

-2-

and, alternatively, if the district court complied with Rule 32,

the presentence report provided insufficient indicia of

reliability to support the district court's findings; and 3) the

district court should have required a standard of proof of

relevant conduct greater than a preponderance of the evidence.

 We review for plain error the issues whether Washington's

statement to the deputies was unreliable and whether the

presentence report provided sufficient indicia of reliability and

perceive none. See United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160,

162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266

(1995). Washington failed to object on these grounds at

sentencing after the district court amended the presentence

report and reduced the base offense level. Washington's

contention that the district court did not comply with Rule 32 is

unsupported by the record. To the extent that the argument

concerning the standard of proof required at sentencing was

properly raised in the district court, Washington's sentence did

not require a higher burden of proof. See United States v.

Carreon, 11 F.3d 1225, 1240 (5th Cir. 1994).

 AFFIRMED.
#### Samuel ST. CLAIR et ux., Appellants, v. SAM DAVIS CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-371.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 29, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 2, 1973.

Samuel St. Clair, in pro. per.

No appearance for appellees.

*647PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record in this case, which is wholly incomplete. On the basis of what we have before us we cannot say that the appellants have demonstrated reversible error. We are compelled, therefore, to the conclusion that the trial judge was in a better position to decide this case than we are and we will rely on the presumption that he was correct.

Affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON, and BOARDMAN, JJ, concur.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1258 

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously to First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during 

the Civil War. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal 

of Honor posthumously to First Lieutenant Alonzo H. 

Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress makes the following findings: 

5 (1) Alonzo H. Cushing was born in Delafield, 

6 Wisconsin, on January 19, 1841. 

7 (2) Alonzo H. Cushing graduated from the 

8 United States Military Academy at West Point, New 

9 York, on June 24, 1861. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1258 IS

1 (3) On July 3, 1863, First Lieutenant Alonzo 

2 H. Cushing commanded Battery A, 4th United 

3 States Artillery, Army of the Potomac, during the 

4 Battle of Gettysburg. 

5 (4) During the battle, First Lieutenant Alonzo 

6 H. Cushing was shot multiple times but refused to 

7 retreat. 

8 (5) First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing contin9 ued to command his battery until he was shot and 

10 killed. 

11 (6) The Union victory at the Battle of Gettys12 burg was one of the key turning points in the Civil 

13 War. 

14 (7) The Secretary of the Army and the Sec15 retary of Defense have determined that the actions 

16 of First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing do merit the 

17 award of the Medal of Honor. 

18 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF 

19 HONOR TO FIRST LIEUTENANT ALONZO H. 

20 CUSHING FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE 

21 CIVIL WAR. 

22 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding the time lim23 itations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States 

24 Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the 

25 awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1258 IS

1 Armed Forces, the President is authorized to award the 

2 Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to then 

3 First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for conspicuous acts 

4 of gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life and beyond 

5 the call of duty in the Civil War, as described in subsection 

6 (b). 

7 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

8 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of then First 

9 Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing while in command of Bat10 tery A, 4th United States Artillery, Army of the Potomac, 

11 at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on July 3, 1863, during the 

12 American Civil War. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2012136EN.01000501.xml

| 11.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 May 2012

2012/C 136/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,295 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 102,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80495 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9097 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,201 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,563 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,243 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 290,7 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6983 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2154 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,421 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3236 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2886 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3007 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,053 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6509 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6232 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 481,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3988 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1726 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,505 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 951,56 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9808 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,18 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,3 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,287 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5337 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4978 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,768 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,295

JPY

Japanese yen

102,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80495

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9097

CHF

Swiss franc

1,201

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,563

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,243

HUF

Hungarian forint

290,7

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6983

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2154

RON

Romanian leu

4,421

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3236

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2886

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3007

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,053

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6509

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6232

KRW

South Korean won

1 481,06

ZAR

South African rand

10,3988

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1726

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,505

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 951,56

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9808

PHP

Philippine peso

55,18

RUB

Russian rouble

39,3

THB

Thai baht

40,287

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5337

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4978

INR

Indian rupee

69,768

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,778                   3,498
<SECURITIES>                                     4,959                   6,297
<RECEIVABLES>                                      136                      55
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,309                  10,041
<PP&E>                                           1,776                   1,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                     935                     836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,197                  11,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,545                   1,470
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           105                     105
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,403                  10,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,197                  11,768
<SALES>                                              0                       7
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   102                     483
<CGS>                                                0                     579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      143                     930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,703                   9,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,662)                (10,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,662)                (10,140)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.25)                  (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
No. 11579.

#### Coleman *v.*The Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.

Decided November 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Mr. G. B. Keppel,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Doyle Sr Lewis,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Council BOHANNON, Appellant, v. FMC CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-908.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 10, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Indian River County; C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
:

SCHEDULE of the whole number 6f Persons within the Division allotted to

_ re mati eat — home heaeretons prenne antes n — ~

FREE WHATTE PRESO 4%

of tt ZEF

vy

nates

meer

ptt

oe en

ee ee

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http:/Awww.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

BUIF. CRELS, FALLS VER

dpeyatorrsavaarine it a Sie
# C_2012305EN.01001201.xml

| 10.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6668 — Mondi/Nordenia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 305/03

On 29 August 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6668. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6668. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Charles L. HOLMES v. DAVIS-OGDEN, INC. and Silhouette Figure Form, Inc.

No. 53535.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: Davis-Ogden, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 274 So.2d 821.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MIDWEST EXPRESS HOLDINGS, INC. AS OF
     AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         24,120
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125
<INVENTORY>                                    8,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               54,069
<PP&E>                                         333,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                 101,612
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 296,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,784
<BONDS>                                        2,937
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       145
<OTHER-SE>                                     137,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   296,052
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               359,609
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  342,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               16
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                18,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,801
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,594
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      (4,713)
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,881
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .49



</TABLE>
# C_2011321EN.01001901.xml

| 4.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/19

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.6262 — AGRANA/RWA/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 321/14

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 30 September 2011, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between AGRANA and RWA. On 27 October 2011, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1935 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore access to diabetic 

testing supplies for Medicare beneficiaries. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2014 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore 

access to diabetic testing supplies for Medicare beneficiaries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Diabetic Testing Sup5 ply Access Act of 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1935 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR RETAIL COMMUNITY PHARMACIES 

2 TO DELIVER DIABETIC TESTING SUPPLIES TO 

3 MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1847(a) of the Social Se5 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3(a)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(8) Nothing in this section shall be construed 

8 as authorizing the Secretary (through regulation, 

9 guidance, instruction, or otherwise) to restrict or 

10 eliminate an individual’s option of electing, regard11 less of delivery method (except by mail and private 

12 parcel service), to have diabetic testing supplies de13 livered to the individual by a retail community phar14 macy (as defined in section 1927(k)(10)), including 

15 a retail community pharmacy that contracts with a 

16 long-term care facility, assisted living facility, group 

17 home, or other type of residential setting recognized 

18 by the State. This paragraph shall not be construed 

19 as changing the amount of payment made under this 

20 part for diabetic testing supplies, but only as author21 izing delivery of such supplies to individuals through 

22 retail community pharmacies.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 subsection (a) shall apply to diabetic testing supplies deliv25 ered on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 11355.

#### Wagar *v.*Knopf, alias Knapp.

Decided December 7, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Tanney & Barber,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Mathews & Or gill,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, . C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Sriaucic and Price, JJ., concur.