alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul J.B. Murphy, III, as Chief Executive Officerof Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          the Quarterly Report ofthe Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 4, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ PAUL J. B. MURPHY, III  |
|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|               |   |   |   | Paul J.B. Murphy, III       |
|               |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer     |
|               |   |   |   | Principal Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2012139EN.01001702.xml

| 15.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6527 — Rio Tinto/Richards Bay Minerals)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 139/06

On 4 May 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6527. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6527. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-34653 and 333-84387) pertaining to the Congoleum Corporation
1995 Stock Option Plan and the Non-Qualified, Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan of our report dated April 10, 2003, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Congoleum Corporation included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 10, 2003
#### The T M COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and Orange Cablevision, Inc., a corporation, Appellees.

Nos. 72-1029, 72-1030.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 27, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
Table 12.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  1960, 1965, 1970, 1975, and 1980 to 1996


                            1960    1965    1970    1975    1980    1981    1982    1983


United States............   62.1    63.3    64.2    64.6    65.6    65.4    64.8    64.6
  Inside Metropolitan Areas (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)
    In central  cities/1.   (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)/1..........   (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)
  Outside Metropolitan Areas (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)    (NA)

  Northeast..............   55.5    57.7    58.1    59.2    60.8    60.8    61.1    61.5
  Midwest................   66.4    68.6    69.5    70.2    69.8    69.7    69.4    69.3
  South..................   63.4    64.4    66.0    66.0    68.7    68.2    66.7    67.0
  West...................   62.2    59.3    60.0    60.8    60.0    60.2    59.4    58.2


                            1984    1985    1986    1987    1988    1989    1990    1991


United States............   64.5    63.9    63.8    64.0    63.8    63.9    63.9    64.1
  Inside Metropolitan Areas (NA)    (NA)    61.2    61.4    61.3    61.3    61.3    61.4
    In central  cities/1.   (NA)    (NA)    48.5    48.7    48.3    48.7    48.7    48.7
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)/1..........   (NA)    (NA)    70.8    70.8    70.6    70.2    70.1    70.2
  Outside Metropolitan Areas (NA)    (NA)    72.3    72.8    72.6    72.8    73.2    73.2

  Northeast..............   61.2    60.8    61.4    61.7    61.3    62.0    62.6    62.3
  Midwest................   68.4    66.9    66.9    67.3    67.5    67.7    67.5    67.2
  South..................   67.0    66.4    66.1    66.3    65.8    65.9    65.7    66.1
  West...................   58.5    59.0    58.3    58.4    58.5    57.8    58.0    58.6



                            1992    1993  1993/r    1994    1995    1996


United States............   64.1    64.5    64.0    64.0    64.7    65.4
  Inside Metropolitan Areas 61.6    62.0    61.5    61.7    62.7    63.4
    In central  cities/1.   49.3    49.2    48.6    48.5    49.5    49.7
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)/1..........   70.1    70.7    70.3    70.3    71.2    72.2
  Outside Metropolitan Areas72.8    72.9    72.6    72.0    72.7    73.5

  Northeast..............   62.5    62.4    61.8    61.5    62.0    62.2
  Midwest................   67.2    67.4    67.1    67.7    69.2    70.6
  South..................   65.8    66.1    65.7    65.6    66.7    67.5
  West...................   59.3    60.4    59.9    59.4    59.2    59.2


Data from 1986 to 1994 are based on 1980 metropolitan/nonmetropolitan definitions,
while 1995 and later data are based on 1990 metropolitan/nonmetropolitan definitions.
See Source and Accuracy section for explanation.

NA Not available.
rRevised.
1Rates for 1986 to 1994 are not comparable to earlier or later  years.  Rates for 1995 and later
are not directly comparable to earlier years. See Source and Accuracy section for explanation.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CONTINENTAL MATERIALS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report of Continental MaterialsCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James G. Gidwitz, the Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph J. Sum, the Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiods presented in the Report.

 

 

April 13, 2005

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ James G. Gidwitz                       |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | James G. Gidwitz                           |   |
|   |   | Chairman of the Board and                  |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer                    |   |
|   |   |                                       |   |
|   |   |                                       |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Joseph J. Sum                          |   |
|   |   | Joseph J. Sum                              |   |
|   |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|        |        |                                            |        |  |  |

 

----
#### Oliver LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-722.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1973.

Oliver Lee, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Oliver Lee, pro se, appeals from a conviction based on a jury verdict on the charge of robbery.

Appellant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial.

We have considered appellant’s contentions in light of the record on appeal and the briefs and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. See: Luster v. State, Fla.App.1972, 262 So.2d 910; Cf., State v. Sears, 148 Fla. 89, 3 So.2d 721. We have reached our decision without considering the merits of an affidavit of another prisoner, George Hagin, which purports to absolve appellant of complicity in the commission of the crime for which he was convicted. That information was not considered since it is not properly before us in this appeal. This is not to say that it cannot be brought to the attention of the trial court in an appropriate proceeding.

Therefore, for the reasons stated the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  1965 to 2005

   Year     First    Second     Third     Fourth
           Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter

2005....        69.1      68.6
2004....        68.6      69.2      69.0      69.2
2003....        68.0      68.0      68.4      68.6
2002\r..        67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2002....        67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2001....        67.5      67.7      68.1      68.0
2000....        67.1      67.2      67.7      67.5

1999....        66.7      66.6      67.0      66.9
1998....        65.9      66.0      66.8      66.4
1997....        65.4      65.7      66.0      65.7
1996....        65.1      65.4      65.6      65.4
1995....        64.2      64.7      65.0      65.1
1994....        63.8      63.8      64.1      64.2
1993\r..        63.7      63.9      64.2      64.2
1993....        64.2      64.4      64.7      64.6
1992....        64.0      63.9      64.3      64.4
1991....        63.9      63.9      64.2      64.2
1990....        64.0      63.7      64.0      64.1
1989\r..        63.9      63.8      64.1      63.8

1989....        63.9      63.9      64.0      63.8
1988....        63.7      63.7      64.0      63.8
1987....        63.8      63.8      64.2      64.1
1986....        63.6      63.8      63.8      63.9
1985....        64.1      64.1      63.9      63.5
1984....        64.6      64.6      64.6      64.1
1983....        64.7      64.7      64.8      64.4
1982....        64.8      64.9      64.9      64.5
1981....        65.6      65.3      65.6      65.2
1980....        65.5      65.5      65.8      65.5
1979\r..        64.8      64.9      65.8      65.4

1979....        65.3      65.1      66.0      65.8
1978....        64.8      64.4      65.2      65.4
1977....        64.8      64.5      65.0      64.9
1976....        64.6      64.6      64.9      64.8
1975....        64.4      64.9      64.6      64.5
1974....        64.8      64.8      64.6      64.4
1973....        64.9      64.4      64.4      64.4
1972....        64.3      64.5      64.3      64.4
1971....        64.0      64.1      64.4      64.5
1970....        64.3      64.0      64.4      64.0
1969....        64.1      64.4      64.4      64.4
1968....        63.6      64.1      64.1      63.6
1967....        63.3      63.9      63.8      63.5
1966....        63.5      63.2      63.3      63.8
1965....        62.9      62.9      62.9      63.4
\r Revised.
<PAGE>


                               COURIER CORPORATION
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

                                   EXHIBIT 21

Registrant has the following subsidiaries:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                                 % Owned
                                                                                        Jurisdiction of        by Immediate
               Name                                   Immediate Parent                   Incorporation            Parent
------------------------------------        --------------------------------------    ---------------------   ---------------
<S>                                         <C>                                       <C>                      <C>
Courier-Citizen Company                     Courier Corporation                       Massachusetts                100%

Courier Investment Corporation              Courier Corporation                       Massachusetts                100%

Book-mart Press, Inc.                       Courier Corporation                       New Jersey                   100%

The Home School, Inc.                       Courier Corporation                       Massachusetts                100%

Courier Westford, Inc.                      Courier Delaware Holding Corp.            Massachusetts                100%

National Publishing Company                 Courier Delaware Holding Corp.            Pennsylvania                 100%

Courier Stoughton, Inc.                     Courier Delaware Holding Corp.            Massachusetts                100%

Courier Companies, Inc.                     Courier Delaware Holding Corp.            Massachusetts                100%

Courier Kendallville, Inc.                  Courier Delaware Holding Corp.            Indiana                      100%

Courier New Media, Inc.                     Courier Delaware Holding Corp.            Massachusetts                100%

Courier Foreign Sales Corporation Ltd.      National Publishing Company               Jamaica                      99%

Courier Delaware Holding Corp.              Courier-Citizen Company                   Delaware                     100%

Courier Properties, Inc.                    Courier-Citizen Company                   Massachusetts                100%

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 38694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16872]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 4, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc., Mattoon, Illinois; to 
acquire 100 percent of SCB Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
acquire Soy Capital Bank and Trust Company, both of Decatur, Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice 
President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. Park Financial Group, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota; to acquire 
48.46 percent of Mesaba Bancshares, Inc., Grand Rapids, Minnesota; and 
thereby indirectly acquire The Lake Bank, Two Harbors, Minnesota, and 
American Bank of the North, Nashwauk, Minnesota. In addition, Park 
Financial Group, Inc., has acquired an option to purchase the remaining 
51.54 percent of the voting shares of Mesaba Bancshares, Inc., Grand 
Rapids, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 2, 
2018.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-16872 Filed 8-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3287

_____________________________
M ICHAEL J OSEPH N ILIO , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Linda F. Mc C allum , Judge

. May 31, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , O STERHAUS , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael Joseph Nilio, Appellant , pro se

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# A

# Sheet1
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles E. Johnson, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transpro, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  August 11, 2003                     /s/ Charles E. Johnson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles E. Johnson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Karen M. Spaun
    -----------------------------

Karen M. Spaun
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2003