alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Interest of M. H. and E. Q.

No. 70-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 10, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In re GUARDIANSHIP OF Susan F. FOLTZ, a/k/a Claudia Grace Foltz, Incompetent.

No. 71-252.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 3, 1971.

Appeal from County Judge’s Court, Broward- County; Paul M. Marico, III, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
10.14


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO


 


LICENSE,
FUNDING AND OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT


 


THIS
IS THE FIRST AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) to the License, Funding and Operational Agreement for rabies immunotherapy (the
“Agreement”) between Mid-Atlantic BioTherapeutics, Inc. (“Licensor”) and Curative Biotechnology, Inc., formerly
Connectyx, (“Licensee”) originally executed September 30th, 2020.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS,
the Licensor and Licensee have executed the Agreement referred to above;


 


and


 


WHEREAS,
in the Agreement Sections 8 and 12 refer to the obligation of Licensee to raise money to fund the rabies immunotherapy program and also
includes a termination date if a minimum amount of money has not been raised; and


 


WHEREAS,
the method and timing for raising that money has changed and the parties wish to update the Agreement to reflect that;


 


WHEREAS,
the Licensor and Licensee wish to amend the Agreement as set forth herein,


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, Licensor and Licensee amend the Agreement as follows:


 


8.
Project Funding. Section 8 is amended to state that all obligations of the Licensor shall be contingent upon Licensee raising at least
$6.5 million dollars within 180 days of Licensee’s S1 going effective.


 


12.
Term and Termination. The termination date of December 31, 2020, is amended to March 30, 2022.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this First Amendment this 30thth day of December, 2021.


 


	LICENSOR	 	LICENSEE
	 	 	 
	Mid-Atlantic
    BioTherapeutics, Inc.	 	Curative
    Biotechnology, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 /s/ David Horn 	 	 /s/ Richard Garr 
	By:	David
    Horn, M.D.	 	Richard
    Garr
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 2, 2012

t0425 

# Order

May 2, 2012

144013

MARY A. WALDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144013 COA: 298178 Genesee CC: 09-091572-NO ST. JOHN THE EVANGELI ST PARISH, a/k/a THE ORDINARY (BISHOP) OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF LANSING IN TRUST FOR ST. JOHN THE EVANGELIST, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 27, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH



### , M ARILYN 

### K ELLY



### , and H ATHAWAY 

### , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: R.C.A., JR.

PETITION OF: R.C.A., JR. :

:

:

:

: No. 114 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
P.1 

OAR Box 1875 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

26) I I-E-44 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/1/200811:12:45 AM Sheet 26 of 86 
P.2 

A-90-19 

MAY 28 I992 ll-E-44 

tiosr^m 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

I -.<9K^1 \ Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

\ -4Ml£fr- / Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

MAY 2 8 I992 

ntc i B 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Teleconference on the Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON) 

FROM: Daphne McMurrer t2 

Standards Development Branch, ESD (MD-13) 

TO: The Files 

On March 23, 1992 representatives of the Standards 

Development Branch, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) conducted a teleconference 

with representatives of the Chemical Manufacturers Association 

(CMA) and representatives of CMA member companies. This 

teleconference was held to discuss ideas that had been raised in 

a February 13, 1992 meeting attended by representatives of OAQPS, 

CMA and CMA member companies. The February meeting was held so 

that OAQPS staff could explain the provisions of the draft 

proposed HON. The March teleconference was used to clarify the 

reguirements in the December 24, 1991 draft proposed HON and to 

discuss, in a preliminary way, some ideas for potential changes 

to that draft proposal. 

The following aspects of the HON were discussed during the 

March 23, 1992/: (1) the HON Implementation plan; (2) the 

definition of a process vent; (3) the possibility of adding a low 

flow cut-off to the process vent provisions; (4) the need for 

control of intermittent process vents; (5) the need for specific 

language excluding low leg drains, high point bleeds and bypasses 

from the process vent definition; (6) the possibility of using a 

Department of Transportation regulation to ensure the vapor 

tightness of trucks and rail cars transporting chemicals 

regulated by the HON; (7) the need for parameter monitoring for 

Group 2 process vents, especially those without a recovery device 

in place; (8) the need for combining process vents for Total 

Resource Effectiveness (TRE) calculations; and (9) the 

possibility of using engineering estimates instead of parameter 

monitoring results in TRE calculations.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 3405 Not in labor force Number in thousands 40 to 44 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value**LNU05024935Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 40-44 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:09:09 PM)
#### REELFOOT PACKING COMPANY, a corporation, Tennessee Packers, Inc., a corporation, d/b/a Reelfoot Packing Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Chester Alexander DECAIRE, Appellee.

No. 71-28.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 31, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                                   |                                                                              |                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                                   |                                                                              |
| Date: January                18, 2006   | By:                                                                     | /s/ CARRIE                HARTWICK |
|                                                   | Name:                Carrie HartwickTitle:                Chief Executive Officer |

|                                             |                                                                                      |                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                             |                                                                                      |
| Date: January                18, 2006  | By:                                                                             | /s/ CARRIE                HARTWICK |
|                                             | Name:                Carrie HartwickTitle:                Interim Chief Financial Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Euticals 
Inc.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration on or before October 9, 2018.

ADDRESS:  Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division 
(``Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, 
appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on June 
25, 2018, Euticals, Inc., 2460 W Bennett Street, Springfield, Missouri 
65807-1229 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the 
following basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid..............     2010  I
Amphetamine............................     1100  II
Lisdexamfetamine.......................     1205  II
Methylphenidate........................     1724  II
Phenylacetone..........................     8501  II
Methadone..............................     9250  II
Methadone intermediate.................     9254  II
Oripavine..............................     9330  II
Tapentadol.............................     9780  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the above-listed controlled 
substances in bulk for distribution to its customers.

    Dated: July 31, 2018.
John J. Martin,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-16942 Filed 8-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# C_2011358EN.01000602.xml

| 8.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6235 — Honeywell/Sinochem/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 358/04

On 2 December 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6235. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6235. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersignedhereby certify that pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008(the “Form 10-Q”) of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at and for theperiods indicated.

 

Dated:July 31, 2008

 
|   | By:    | /s/ DAVID J. BARRETT                                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | David J. Barrett                                      |
|   | Title: | President and Chief  Executive Officer                |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ HARRY T. HAWKS                                    |
|   | Name:  | Harry T. Hawks                                        |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# C_2012242EN.01000601.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6528 — Dow Europe/Aksa Akrilik/Aksa Karbon/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 242/04

On 6 June 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6528. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6528. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Lillian Mae HUBBARD and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Oscar BROWN and Alberta M. Brown, husband and wife, Appellees.

No. 71-406.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 19, 1972.

*268McNeill, Boyer & Dahlgaard, Sarasota, for appellants.

Kurt F. Lewis, of Law Offices of Dick Lee, Sarasota, for appellees.

LOVE, WILLIAM K., Associate Judge.

Appellant contends error in the trial court’s order granting a new trial in a negligence action.

Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial in a negligence action. The order recited:

> “the judicial conscience of this Court was shocked by the verdict of the jury and it is this Court’s reaction that racial prejudice, among other things, entered into the considerations of a member or members of the jury”.

The discretion of the trial judge in granting a new trial is very broad, but is subject to appellate review, and its validity must be weighed in the light of the disclosures of the record. Russo v. Clark, Fla., 147 So.2d 1.

The trial judge is better positioned than any other person to comprehend the processes by which the decision of the jurors is reached. When he has exercised his talents, knowledge and experience and concludes that the verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence, it is his duty to grant a new trial, and he should always do so if the jury has been deceived as to the force and credibility of the evidence or has been influenced by considerations outside the record. Such ruling should not be disturbed absent a clear showing that it has been abused. Hodge v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., Fla., 234 So.2d 645.

It is obvious that the Court below found the verdict to be contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, and that justice required his action.

Having read the record on appeal, we are unable to conclude that there has been any abuse of the discretion of the trial Court, and affirm his order.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
#### CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. Kenneth G. BARRETT, and Fire Fighters of Fort Lauderdale, Local 1545, I.A.F.F., Inc., a labor organization, Appellees.

No. 71-913.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 25, 1972.

Ronald B. Sladon and Dean Andrews, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert E. Stucker, of Reasbeck & Feg-ers, Hollywood, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs, record, and oral argument, it is the opinion of this court that the appellant has failed to make reversible error appear. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., MAGER, J., and WEHLE, VICTOR O., Associate Judge, concur.
#### William C. VALLES, Appellant, v. Aida S. VALLES, Appellee.

No. 1514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 31, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Augustine BORGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-7.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 21, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-460 

LT Case No. 2021-CF-000085-A 

_____________________________

HIRAM ANTONIO BONILLA, 

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County. 

Richard A. Howard, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz,, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon,

Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P.

Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for

Appellee. 

October 31, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., WALLIS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
# C_2012208EN.01000101.xml

| 14.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6557 — AGC Glass Europe/Interpane International Glas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 208/01

On 29 May 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6557. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6557. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      51,670,895
<SECURITIES>                                12,371,618
<RECEIVABLES>                               44,776,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,209,492
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           110,041,907
<PP&E>                                      66,961,818
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,403,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             226,389,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       57,001,894
<BONDS>                                      8,216,288
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       557,330
<OTHER-SE>                                 160,613,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               161,171,313
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,087,307
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,269,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             17,544,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,773,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,771,489
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,771,489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012287EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/1

---

2012/C 287/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 273, 8.9.2012

OJ C 273, 8.9.2012

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 258, 25.8.2012

OJ C 250, 18.8.2012

OJ C 243, 11.8.2012

OJ C 235, 4.8.2012

OJ C 227, 28.7.2012

OJ C 217, 21.7.2012

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---