alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned officers of The Hartcourt  Companies,  Inc., a Utah corporation (the
"Company"),  does hereby  certify  with respect to the  Quarterly  Report of the
Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

         (1) the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                            THE HARTCOURT COMPANIES, INC.


Date:  November 14, 2003                    By: /s/ David Chen
                                                --------------------------------
                                                David Chen
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Principal Accounting Officer

Date:  November 14, 2003                    By: /s/ Richard Yan
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Richard Yan
                                                Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                                and Financial Controller



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.













                                   EXHIBIT 32
No. 11590.

#### Loy, Admx., *v.*The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Decided January 11, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Shelby county.

*Messrs. Wicoff, Emmons & Needles; Messrs. Elliott & Elliott; Mr. Wymond J. Beckett*and *Messrs. Pugh & Pugh,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Wilson & West; Mr. L. J. Hackney*and *Mr. Andrezu J. Fless,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2018-16111 Filed 7-24-18; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
**Exhibit 23**

 

CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-164416, 333-164415, 333-122136, 333-122137,333-03201, 333-75187, 333-75189 and 333-118033 on Form S-8 of our reportsdated November 24, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statementsand financial statement schedule of Courier Corporation, and the effectivenessof Courier Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, appearingin this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Courier Corporation for the yearended September 25, 2010.

 

*/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP*

 

Boston, Massachusetts

November 24,2010

 

----
#### Mildred COSCIA, Appellant, v. Albert COSCIA, Appellee.

No. 71-423.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 9, 1972.

*255Edward G. Stephany, of Shaw, Marko, Stephany & Lyons, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

John M. McCants, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs and the record on appeal we are of the opinion that the appellant has failed to make error clearly appear except with respect to that part of the final judgment partitioning the marital residence. As a general rule, in the absence of an agreement of the parties or appropriate pleadings praying for partition of jointly owned property upon the entry of a decree of divorce, a chancellor has no authority either to partition jointly owned property or effect what might amount to a property settlement between the parties nor dispose of property belonging to them as an incident to the divorce. Bergh v. Bergh, Fla.App.1961, 127 So.2d 481. A more detailed discussion of this proposition is set forth in the very recent opinion of Rankin v. Rankin, Fla.App.1972, 258 So.2d 489.

Accordingly, that part of the final decree partitioning the real property is reversed and the cause remanded for further consideration in light of the procedure set forth in Rankin v. Rankin, supra; in all other respects the final judgment is affirmed.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
# C_2011357EN.01000201.xml

| 7.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 December 2011

2011/C 357/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3394 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 104,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4348 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85655 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0552 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2388 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7160 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,230 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 300,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6978 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4548 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3540 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4618 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3094 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3640 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4095 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7209 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7223 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 513,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,7993 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4847 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5100 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 124,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1990 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,111 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,8780 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,294 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3995 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1040 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,7310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3394

JPY

Japanese yen

104,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4348

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85655

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0552

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2388

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7160

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,230

HUF

Hungarian forint

300,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6978

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4548

RON

Romanian leu

4,3540

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4618

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3094

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3640

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4095

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7209

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7223

KRW

South Korean won

1 513,76

ZAR

South African rand

10,7993

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4847

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5100

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 124,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1990

PHP

Philippine peso

58,111

RUB

Russian rouble

41,8780

THB

Thai baht

41,294

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3995

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1040

INR

Indian rupee

68,7310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 99.1

     Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      I, Marshall W. Pagon, the Chief Executive Officer of Pegasus Media &
Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of Pegasus Media &
Communications, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the "March
31, 2003 Form 10-Q"), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the March 31, 2003
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Pegasus Media & Communications, Inc.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Pegasus Media & Communications, Inc. and will be retained by
Pegasus Media & Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  May 14, 2003

                                     /s/ Marshall W. Pagon
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                      Marshall W. Pagon
#### Joseph H. CROSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-888.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|/s/ | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | (Signature)            
|    | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | Chief Executive Officer



|    |                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ | David R. McHale                                  
|    | (Signature)                                      
|    | David R. McHale                                  
|    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Date:  March 7, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2012064EN.01000301.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6413 — OJSC Power Machines/Toshiba/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 64/02

On 24 February 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6413. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6413. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1



                        AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED           NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    SEPTEMBER 30,                SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                2000           1999           2000          1999
                                                             -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------
<S>                                                          <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>
Net earnings (loss) ......................................   $   323,000   $ (4,961,000) $    630,000   $(4,906,000)
                                                             ===========   ============   ===========   ===========

Common shares outstanding at beginning of period .........     6,496,623      6,475,069     6,480,194     6,475,069

     Effect of shares issued during the period ...........            91             --         8,089            --
                                                             -----------   ------------   -----------   -----------

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares .........     6,496,714      6,475,069     6,488,283     6,475,069
                                                             ===========   ============   ===========   ===========

     Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share .........   $      0.05   $      (0.77)  $      0.10   $     (0.76)
</TABLE>
#### In re The Marriage of Hopie ARNOLD, Appellant, v. Holly Addison ARNOLD, Appellee.

No. 72-802.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 28, 1973.

Fred J. Wood's, Jr., Tampa, for appellant.

John R. McArthur, Lakeland, for appel-lee.

LILES, Judge.

Appellant Hopie Arnold petitioned the Circuit Court in and for Hillsborough County for dissolution of marriage. The trial judge granted appellee Holly Arnold’s motion for a change of venue to Polk County the place of his residence. Mrs. Arnold takes this interlocutory appeal.

Florida Statutes § 47.011, F.S.A. provides that actions may be brought where the defendant resides, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located. There is no property to be litigated.

Does the place where the marriage is alleged to have become irretrievably broken constitute the locus of the cause of action under the venue statute? This question has not heretofore been decided since the amendment of Chapter 61, Fla. Stat. (1971), providing for the dissolution of marriage. However, we hold that the place of the cause of action alleged by the petitioner is sufficient; and, where contested, the locus of the cause of action must be decided by the judge consistent with Fla.Stat. § 47.011.

Since the facts are not in dispute in this appeal, we have only the question of where the marriage became irretrievably broken, thereby creating a cause of action under the venue statute.

Petitioner alleged that her husband came to her place of employment in Hillsbor-ough County, after she had removed herself from the marital residence in Polk County, and caused her undue embarrassment and threatened to do it again. It was after these visits that she filed her petition. It therefore appears that the cause of action arose in Hillsborough County, and the trial judge erred in transferring venue to Polk County. See, Bannerman v. Bannerman, 204 So.2d 234 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1967), cert. dismissed 210 So.2d 220 (Fla.1968).

Reversed and remanded for action consistent with this opinion. ,

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
### Memo to the Docket EPA- HQ - OPPT - 2009 - 0187

– submitted by Karen Hoffman

Topic: American Chemistry Council (A CC ) Meeting with EPA Date: September 17, 2010 Topic: IUR Modification Proposed Rule Attendees: Robert Kiefer, ACC, Sarah Bronzena, ACC; A.W.Beers, Omnova,Robert W. Freerksen, DuPont; Imogene Treble, Dow; Kathleen Roberts, Bergesen & Campbell; Jim Willis, EPA; Sara Hisel
- McCoy , EPA; Chenise Farquharson, EPA; Karen Hoffman, EPA; Susan Sharkey , EPA; Diane Sheridan, EPA.
EPA Meeting with the A merican Chemistry Council (ACC) EPA met with American Chemistry Council (ACC) representatives to discuss the IUR Proposed Rule. Topics included the timing and scope of the final rule , extension of the comment period in order to allow mo re tim e to respond to Sect ion 5 and lowering the 300,000 lb threshold for the production and use information reporting requirement. ACC inquired about hold ing a n EPA- sponsored public workshop for industry to help inform industry ’s development of data bases to interface with the el ectronic Form U
. Another topic included retrieving industry records of chemical substance formulas that change from year to year. ( S ee attachments )
#### Jo Ann Henry, wife of David C. HENRY v. David C. HENRY.

No. 62425.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Jo Ann Henry applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ denied: On the showing made, we cannot say the previous courts erred in result.

SUMMERS and DIXON, JJ., would grant the writ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than August 20, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City*                     (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

                    1.                     *Ernest E. (Gene) Dillard, Sheila A. Dillard, and Aaron D. Dillard, all of Tulsa Oklahoma, and Sarah E. Dillard, Dallas, Texas;*                     to acquire voting shares of First Pryor Bancorp, Inc., Pryor, Oklahoma, and thereby be approved as members of the Dillard family group, which owns voting shares of First Pryor Bancorp, Inc. and thereby indirectly owns First Pryority Bank, Pryor, Oklahoma, and Locust Grove Banshares, Inc., Locust Grove, Oklahoma, which owns Lakeside Bank of Salina, Salina, Oklahoma, and Bank of Locust Grove, Locust Grove, Oklahoma.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 31, 2018.

Yao-Chin Chao,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-16701 Filed 8-3-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
#### Thomas J. D’ALBORA v. TULANE UNIVERSITY et al.

No. 53514.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: Thomas J. D’Albora applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 274 So.2d 825.

Writ denied. Under facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error.