alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-03-0256-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

DECEMBER 15, 2004

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M. AND T.M., CHILDREN

_________________________________

FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NO. B31979-0202; HONORABLE ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Cindy Marriott appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights in her

children M.M. and T.M. We affirm. 

Following a non-jury trial, appellant Cindy Marriott’s parental rights in her children

M.M. and T.M. were terminated. Among other matters, the record contains a great deal of

evidence concerning illegal activity by Marriott which resulted in her incarceration. Her

activities included illegal drug use around the children for many years, extended

associations with persons who also used illegal drugs in Marriott’s home while the children
-2-

were present, and her refusal to modify her behavior despite numerous attempts to help

her do so by various agencies, entities and persons. 

Marriott gave notice of appeal. The trial court appointed counsel for her appeal.

See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(e) (Vernon 2002). 

Appointed counsel for appellant has filed a Motion to Withdraw and a Brief in support

thereof. In support of the motion to withdraw, counsel has certified that, in compliance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-745, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the

record has been diligently reviewed and that in the opinion of counsel, the record reflects

no reversible error or grounds upon which a non-frivolous appeal can arguably be

predicated. Counsel thus concludes that the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel has attached exhibits showing that a copy of the Anders brief and Motion

to Withdraw have been forwarded to appellant, and that counsel has appropriately advised

appellant of appellant’s right to review the record and file a response to counsel’s motion

and brief. Appellant has not filed a response to counsel’s motion and brief. The Texas

Department of Protective and Regulatory Services has filed an extensive brief in which the

Department concurs with Marriott’s appointed counsel’s opinion that the appeal is frivolous.

We have made an independent examination of the record to determine whether

there are any arguable grounds for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109

S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.Crim.App.

1991). We have found no such grounds. We agree that the appeal is frivolous.
-3-

Accordingly, counsel’s Motion to Withdraw is granted. The judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

Phil Johnson

Chief Justice
AFS

- 14

- 377

- E

15 August, 2014

Exemption No. 9775C

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2008

- 0994

Mr. Chuck Horgan

Director of Maintenance

Center for Emergency Medicine of Western Pennsylvania , Inc.

S TAT MedEvac

10 Allegheny County Airport

West Mifflin, PA 15122

Dear Mr. Horgan :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9775,

as amended . It explains the basis for our decision , describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated 7 July, 2014

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of the Center for Emergency Medicine, d/b/a STAT MedEvac (STAT) for an

exemption from § § 91.4 11(b) and 91.413(c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

(14 CFR) . The Exemption, if granted, would allow STAT to perform air traffic control (ATC)

transponder tests and inspections and altimeter systems and altimeter reporting equipment

tests and ins pections for its part 135 aircraft maintained under an approved aircraft inspect ion

program (AAIP).

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for g ranting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register beca use the requested extension of the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to STAT.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for th e issuance of Exemption No. 9775, as

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,

under the authori ty provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106 (f)

, 40113

, and 44701, which the FAA

Administrator has delegat ed to me, I grant Center for Emergency Medicine, d/b/a STAT

MedEvac an exemption extension to perform Air Traffic Control (ATC) transponder tests

and inspections and altimeter systems and altimeter reporting equipment tests and inspections

for its part 135 aircraft maintained under an approved aircraft inspection program (AAIP).

S ubject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. All ATC transponder tests and inspections and all altimeter reporting equipment tests

and inspections must be conducted under STAT’s part 135 AAIP.

2. All tests and inspections must be recorded in the aircraft’s maintenance log by the

person performing each insp ection and test. This record must identify the person

performing the inspection, the date of the inspection, and this exemption number.

3. All records of these tests and inspections also must be kept in STAT’s maintenance

recording system for its part 135 ai rcraft.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9775, as amended, to

October 31, 2016

, unless so oner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Leslie Smith

Ac ting Deputy Director, Flight Standards
#### In the Matter of STATE ex rel. Robert L. ROSHTO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilbert Lee YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3934.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 18, 1972.

*262Nolan J. Edwards and Homer E. Bar-ousse, Jr., Crowley, for defendant-appellant.

Robert L. Roshto, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and DO-MENGEAUX, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

This appeal seeks a reversal of the Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Control which revoked the license of Gilbert L. Young, holder of a retail liquor permit and operator of a lounge where alcoholic beverages are sold by the drink.

On July 21, 1971, two detectives assigned by the Sheriff’s Office of Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, visited the premises of Young and upon arrival found Nancy Carroll present on the premises. Nancy was under 18 years of age at the time of the incident.

The Board, apparently acting under LSA-R.S. 26:88, proceeded to have a hearing to revoke Young’s license.

The above section provides in part;

> “No person holding a retail dealer’s permit and no agent, associate, employee, representative, or servant of any such person shall do or permit any of the.,following acts to be done on or about the licensed premises:

> “(3) Invite or permit any person under the age of eighteen years to visit or loiter in or about any place where alcoholic beverages or beer are the principal commodities sold or handled.”

After a hearing, the Board revoked Young’s license. He appealed, and the case was tried de novo.

The evidence reveals that on the date the detectives visited the Young premises, Nancy was there. She was behind the bar but was’ not serving drinks. -Young was contemplating hiring Nancy' for work in the lounge, but she did' not go to work at that time because a uniform was being ordered for her. No drinks were served by Nancy on the occasion of the visit by the detectives.

There is no showing in the transcript that Young had ever been convicted of any crime or that he had any difficulty with the Board prior to this one occasion.

The record reveals that Nancy was born July 17, 1953, and the incident occurred on June 24, 1971. She was accordingly not eighteen years of age.

We believe that under the circumstances of this case, the penalty imposed by the Board was too severe. However, under a strict construction of the above act, the Bo'ard had the authority to revoke the license of Young.

It is hornbook law that the courts will not interfere with decisions of administrative boards unless they are arbitrary, capricious, and made without good cause.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the district court is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.

*263DOMENGEAUX, J.,

concurs in the result but expresses no opinion concerning the severity of the penalty invoked by the Board.
#### Harvey D. HAMILTON and M. L. Farris v. Raymond POTEET and Donald R. McGill.

No. 49479.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 21, 1977.

Billy J. Gilmore, Lexington, for appellant.

Barrett, Barrett & Barrett, Pat M. Barrett, Jr., Lexington, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Holmes County; B. B. Wilkes, Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM and LEE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21

COURIER CORPORATION  SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Registrant has the following subsidiaries:

|Name                                             |  | Immediate Parent                                 |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation |  | % Owned
by Immediate
Parent |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | -
|Book-mart Press, Inc.                            |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | New Jersey                    |  | 100                         | %
|Courier New Media, Inc.                          |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | Massachusetts                 |  | 100                         | %
|Courier Companies, Inc.                          |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | Massachusetts                 |  | 100                         | %
|Courier Kendallville, Inc.                       |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | Indiana                       |  | 100                         | %
|Courier Properties, Inc.                         |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | Massachusetts                 |  | 100                         | %
|Dover Bookstore, Inc.                            |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | New York                      |  | 100                         | %
|Dover Publications, Inc.                         |  | Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | New York                      |  | 100                         | %
|Massachusetts National Publishing Business Trust |  | National Publishing Company                      |  | Massachusetts                 |  | 100                         | %
|National Publishing Company                      |  | Courier Corporation                              |  | Pennsylvania                  |  | 100                         | %
|Courier Foreign Sales Corporation Ltd.           |  | National Publishing Company                      |  | Jamaica                       |  | 99                          | %

---

QuickLinks
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.16 **Contact:**  Samantha O’Neil
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, JAN. 26, 2010 Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to Mobile Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why “I count!” and view messages from other road tour participants.
    Near the O.H. Delchamps Jr. Student Life Conference Complex
 For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2012166EN.01001001.xml

| 12.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/10

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open selection procedure — Administrative Assistant — Reference: EF-TA-12-04

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 161 A of 7 June 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 161 A of 7 June 2012

2012/C 166/08

On page 2:

for:

‘Successful candidates may be recruited as Temporary Agents (AST 1) or Contract Agents (function group IV).’,

read:

‘Successful candidates may be recruited as Temporary Agents (AST 1) or Contract Agents (function group II).’.

---
# C_2012366EN.01000301.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/3

---

Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of five Judges

2012/C 366/05

At a meeting on 9 October 2012, the Judges of the Court of Justice elected, pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 16 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Mr Tizzano as President of the First Chamber, Ms Silva de Lapuerta as President of the Second Chamber, Mr Ilešič as President of the Third Chamber, Mr Bay Larsen as President of the Fourth Chamber and Mr von Danwitz as President of the Fifth Chamber for a period of three years expiring on 6 October 2015.

---
---

Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Nidhi
H. Andalon, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:





(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
September 25, 2009





/s/NIDHI H.
      ANDALONNidhi
      H. Andalon,Principal
      Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Scott Boggess 

### Chief, American Community Survey Coordination Staff 

Scott Boggess is the Chief of the American Community Survey (ACS) Coordination Staff in the Social, Economic, and Housing Statistics Division.  The primary responsibility of the Coordination Staff is to oversee the editing, review, and tabulation of the ACS data. Dr. Boggess started his Census career in the Education and Social Stratification Branch where he was the lead ACS analyst for education and language. Prior to Census he worked as an Assistant Professor of Demography at Georgetown University. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Michigan.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
Exhibit 7.1

Financial ratios

|                                                   |  |  |      |  |  |  |              |   |  |  |              |   |  |  |              |   |  |  |              |  
|-------------------------------------------------- |  |  | ---- |  |  |  | ------------ | - |  |  | ------------ | - |  |  | ------------ | - |  |  | ------------ | -
|Year ended 31 March                                |  |  | 2014 |  |  |  | 2013Restated | a |  |  | 2012Restated | a |  |  | 2011Restated | a |  |  | 2010Restated | a
|Return on capital employedb                        |  |  |      |  |  |  |              |   |  |  |              |   |  |  |              |   |  |  |              |  
|Adjustedc %                                       |  |  | 22.9 |  |  |  | 22.1         |   |  |  | 20.4         |   |  |  | 18.5         |   |  |  | 16.1         |  
|Reported  %                                       |  |  | 21.1 |  |  |  | 20.6         |   |  |  | 19.3         |   |  |  | 16.7         |   |  |  | 13.3         |  
|Interest coverd                                    |  |  |      |  |  |  |              |   |  |  |              |   |  |  |              |   |  |  |              |  
|Adjustedc times                                   |  |  | 5.8  |  |  |  | 5.1          |   |  |  | 4.5          |   |  |  | 3.4          |   |  |  | 2.9          |  
|Reported  times                                   |  |  | 3.8  |  |  |  | 3.8          |   |  |  | 3.7          |   |  |  | 2.0          |   |  |  | 1.9          |  
|Net debt to adjusted EBITDAc times                |  |  | 1.1  |  |  |  | 1.3          |   |  |  | 1.5          |   |  |  | 1.5          |   |  |  | 1.7          |  
|Capital expenditureeas a percentage of revenuec % |  |  | 12.8 |  |  |  | 13.3         |   |  |  | 13.4         |   |  |  | 12.8         |   |  |  | 12.1         |  



|a | Restated, see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------

|b | The ratio is based on profit before taxation and net finance expense to capital employed. Capital employed is represented by total assets less current liabilities (excluding corporation tax, current borrowings,
derivative financial liabilities and finance lease creditors) less deferred and current tax assets, retirement benefit asset, cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial assets and investments.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|c | Before specific items.
|- | ----------------------

|d | The number of times net finance expense is covered by operating profit.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

|e | Before purchases of telecommunications licences.
|- | ------------------------------------------------
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases American Community Survey (ACS) Housing Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.36 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, OCT. 20, 2011 Public Assistance Receipt in the Past 12 Months for Households: 2009 and 2010 This brief, based on the 2009 and 2010 American Community Survey results, notes geographic differences in the distribution of public assistance as well as change between 2009 and 2010. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acsbr10-13.pdf> [PDF]. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Doris R. FREDERICK, Appellant, v. William H. FREDERICK, Appellee.

No. 71-54.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 26, 1971.

Eli Breger, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Charles M. Rieders, Cocoa Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The court has carefully considered the briefs, record and argument of counsel. The appellant has failed to demonstrate error. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.
No. 11108.

#### Johns *v.*Kiser, Treasurer.

Decided October 5, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Miami county.

*Mr. B. F. Harwitz,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. S. Forgy,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2012281EN.01000501.xml

| 18.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/5

---

Call for proposals under the work programme of the Seventh EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2012/C 281/08

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the work programmes of the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call in the Cooperation Specific Programme: Information and Communication Technologies: FP7-ICT-2013-11.

Cooperation Specific Programme: Information and Communication Technologies: FP7-ICT-2013-11.

Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the website:

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/home

---