alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert Lee HAGANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. J-476.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

June 20, 1968.

Robert Lee Hagans, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

SPECTOR, Judge.

This is a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence of life imprisonment imposed against appellant after he entered a plea of guilty to a reduced charge of murder in the second degree. At the time of appellant’s plea of guilty, he was represented and accompanied by counsel.

It is reflected by the record on appeal that the appellant was indicted for first degree murder after he, together with a lady friend, brought about the death of one Lonnie Lee West by, it was charged, “hitting, striking, and beating him to death with an ax.” By pleading guilty to the lesser offense of second degree murder, appellant obviously made for himself what he thought to be a better bargain than the risk of dying in the electric chair should he have been found guilty of first degree murder as charged and a recommendation of mercy withheld by a jury. He now insists that his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made.

The record of the proceedings before the trial judge amply demonstrates that appellant was represented by counsel and that the trial judge expressly inquired of the appellant as to whether he desired to plead guilty and if his desire to do so was free and voluntary. To that inquiry, the appellant answered affirmatively. The court then proceeded to advise the appellant that the decision to plead guilty must be his own decision and that he would not later be permitted to withdraw the guilty plea.

*80We think the record amply reflects that the appellant was not tricked or coerced into pleading guilty to a reduced charge and that he did so after being adequately advised. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., J., concur.
# 2017 NAPCS Structure
# C_2012030EN.01000201.xml

| 3.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/2

---

Special Report No 14/2011 ‘Has EU assistance improved Croatia’s capacity to manage post-accession funding?’

2012/C 30/02

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 14/2011 ‘Has EU assistance improved Croatia’s capacity to manage post-accession funding?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Table 9.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the

                United States:  2003 and 2004

 

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)

 

 

                                                     90-Percent

                                               Confidence Interval (+/-    2004

Type                           2003    2004      of 2004        of       Percent

                            estimate   estimate  Estimate   difference  of total

 

All housing units........   120,834    122,187         281         388      100

 

  Occupied...............   105,560    106,588         297         409       87

    Owner occupied.......    72,054     73,575         298         410       60

    Renter occupied......    33,506     33,013         236         325       27

 

  Vacant.................    15,274     15,599         171         235       13

    Year-round vacant....    11,631     11,884         151         207       10

      For rent...........     3,676      3,802          88         120        3

      For sale only......     1,308      1,307          52          71        1

      Rented or sold,

      awaiting occupancy.       976        991          45          62        1

      Held off market....     5,671      5,784         108         147        5

        For occasional use    1,989      1,967          63          87        2

        Temporarily occupied

        by persons with usual

        residence elsewhere     994      1,068          47          63        1

        For other reasons..   2,688      2,749          75         102        2

                            

     Seasonal vacant.....     3,643      3,715          87         119        3

 

 

\1 A 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence

interval is, in relation to the size of the estiamte, the less reliable the estimate.
# C_2012014EN.01000201.xml

| 17.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 January 2012

2012/C 14/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2669 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 97,25 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4349 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82745 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8748 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2093 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6705 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,595 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6997 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3927 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3140 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3482 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2289 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2929 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8422 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5982 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6349 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 459,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2512 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0024 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5513 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 655,62 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9774 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,510 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2140 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,401 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2599 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1633 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,1500 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2669

JPY

Japanese yen

97,25

DKK

Danish krone

7,4349

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82745

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8748

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2093

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6705

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,595

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6997

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3927

RON

Romanian leu

4,3140

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3482

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2289

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2929

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8422

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5982

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6349

KRW

South Korean won

1 459,69

ZAR

South African rand

10,2512

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0024

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5513

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 655,62

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9774

PHP

Philippine peso

55,510

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2140

THB

Thai baht

40,401

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2599

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1633

INR

Indian rupee

65,1500

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 32.1**Certification     I, Harold E. Riley, certify that:     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citizens, Inc. (the “*Company*”) for theyear ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “*Report*”), I, Harold E. Riley, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: 1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Harold E. Riley         Name: Harold E. Riley    Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chairman     Date: March 14, 2008
#### Johnnie WILLIAMS, Jr. v. STATE.

No. 36120.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sections. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Robert S. Cubbin
   -------------------------------
Robert S. Cubbin
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2004
#### Mal OGDEN, Appellant, v. The LAKELAND LEDGER PUBLISHING CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 71-76.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 14, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 00-7071.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari. denied.
No. 11397.

#### Hangen *v.*Lutz et al., Trustees.

Decided December 14, 1909.

Error to Circuit *534Court of Darke county.

*Messrs. Trainor & Trainor,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Robeson & Yount,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  



           First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

2002.....    67.8     67.6     68.0     68.3
2001.....    67.5     67.7     68.1     68.0
2000.....    67.1     67.2     67.7     67.5

1999.....    66.7     66.6     67.0     66.9
1998.....    65.9     66.0     66.8     66.4
1997.....    65.4     65.7     66.0     65.7
1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2
1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4
\r Revised.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPUTER
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES,  INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF  OPERATIONS  AS OF AND FOR THE  SIX MONTHS  ENDED  JUNE 30,  1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                    14,354,065
<SECURITIES>                                               3,320,311
<RECEIVABLES>                                             14,512,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          39,047,732
<PP&E>                                                    25,934,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                             3,852,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            75,330,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      7,174,015
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                     145,999
<OTHER-SE>                                                67,861,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              75,330,399
<SALES>                                                   43,213,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          43,213,821
<CGS>                                                     25,962,611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             25,962,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             2,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            9,519,925
<INCOME-TAX>                                               3,565,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        5,954,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               5,954,925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.39
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Frank F. COSGROVE, Relator, v. JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, Florida, and Donald E. Stone, Judge, Respondent.

No. 71-1319.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 13, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947986
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          2,333,130
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 116,007,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,077,221
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                208,353,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                       130,825,644
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     76,270,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  208,353,190
<SALES>                                         4,655,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,664,562
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,415,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  200,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,801,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,247,616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.24
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
No. 11315.

#### Duffy, an Infant, by etc., *v.*The Queen City Box Co.

Decided November 30, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Cogan &*Williams, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Robertson & Buchwalter,*for defendant m error.

Judgment reversed and judgment of the common pleas court affirmed.

Summers, Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Iva Jane Merritt OWENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Doris Ann WOODARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. H-493, H-494.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 26, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 23, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 


                                                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                         MARCH 31,
                                                                                ----------------------------
                                                                                    1997            1996
                                                                                ------------    ------------
<S>                                                                            <C>             <C> 
Net loss ....................................................................   $ (4,977,000)   $ (3,736,000)
                                                                                ============    ============
Weighted average shares of Common Stock outstanding..........................     11,565,464         697,520 
Shares related to staff  accounting bulletin topic 4D :                           
  Stock options and warrants ................................................           --           270,351
  Common Stock ..............................................................           --           421,503
  Convertible Preferred Stock (Series C) ....................................           --         3,235,579
                                                                                -------------   ------------
Shares used in computing net loss per share .................................     11,565,464       4,624,953
Net loss per share ..........................................................   $      (0.43)   $      (0.81)
Calculation of shares outstanding for computing pro forma net loss per share:
  Shares used in computing net loss per share ...............................           --         4,624,953
  Adjusted to reflect the effect of the assumed conversion of
     Preferred Stock from the date of issuance ..............................           --         4,598,080
                                                                                                ------------
Shares used in computing pro forma net loss per share .......................           --         9,223,033
Pro forma net loss per share ................................................           --      $      (0.41)
============================================================================================================       
</TABLE> 



--------
/1/ Series A and B shares