alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012199EN.01000202.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6567 — Bouygues/Amelia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 199/04

On 6 June 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6567. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6567. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)    The
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2004,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The
information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date:   July 14, 2004 |                                                     |  |  | /s/   David H. Roche    | 
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- |  |  | ----------------------- | 
|                      |                                                    
|                      | President and Chief Executive Officer               | 
|                      |                                                     |  |  | /s/   Steven M. Caspers | 
|                      |                                                    
|                      | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer | 

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Economic Indicators    >Manufacturing and Trade Inventories and Sales    >FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Manufacturing and Trade Inventories and Sales
  FAQs
 The data that is used as input for the Manufacturing and Trade Inventories and Sales economic indicator release is collected by three separate surveys: the Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories, and Orders Survey, the Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey, and the Monthly Retail Trade Survey. You can find the frequently asked questions (FAQs) for each respective survey by following the links below: Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories, and Orders Survey
 Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey
 Monthly Retail Trade Survey
 Last Revised: February 26, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
No. 11091.

#### Moser *v.*B. S. Porter & Son, a Partnership.

Decided October 19, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Messrs. Welty & Dozjvning,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. H. Leete,*for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment of the court of common pleas affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.
No. 00-6431.

#### Wiley *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors of Bestfoods:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms
S-8 (No. 2-92248 and 33-49847) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-64301) of Bestfoods of
our report dated February 1, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Bestfoods and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1999 which report
appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of BESTFOODS.



/S/ KPMG LLP
-------------------
   (KPMG LLP)


New York, New York
March 27, 2000
# C_2012214EN.01000201.xml

| 20.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6584 — Vodafone/Cable & Wireless)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 214/03

On 3 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6584. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6584. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011381EN.01000101.xml

| 30.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 December 2011

2011/C 381/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2889 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4343 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83600 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9414 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2186 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7740 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,910 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6990 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4411 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3025 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4650 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2799 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3189 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0181 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6815 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6805 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 488,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5089 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1461 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5375 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 861,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0981 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,511 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,5360 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,961 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4201 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0061 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,3790 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2889

JPY

Japanese yen

100,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4343

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83600

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9414

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2186

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7740

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,910

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6990

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4411

RON

Romanian leu

4,3025

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4650

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2799

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3189

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0181

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6815

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6805

KRW

South Korean won

1 488,70

ZAR

South African rand

10,5089

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1461

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5375

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 861,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0981

PHP

Philippine peso

56,511

RUB

Russian rouble

41,5360

THB

Thai baht

40,961

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4201

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0061

INR

Indian rupee

68,3790

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2011286EN.01001201.xml

| 30.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/12

---

Special Report No 8/2011 ‘Recovery of undue payments made under the common agricultural policy’

2011/C 286/04

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 8/2011 ‘Recovery of undue payments made under the common agricultural policy’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
#### GULF AMERICAN LAND CORP. v. MARKS.

No. 36015.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
#### DOTSON TIRE COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Hubbell YOUNG, as father and next friend of Karen Young, a minor, and Hubbell Young, Individually, Appellees.

No. 72-363.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**SECTION        906 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)    | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September                  30, 2006                  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| (2)    | the                  information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                  of The                  Amacore Group, Inc..              |

|   | /s/                  Clark A.                  Marcus         Clark                  A. MarcusChief                  Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### AERO-MAYFLOWER TRANSIT CO., INC., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Albert A. ZISK and Dorothy Zisk, his wife, Appellees.

No. 72-1011.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 19, 1973.

Glenn M. Woodworth, of Ulmer & Woodworth, St. Petersburg, and Barry M. Salzman, Clearwater, for appellants.

William J. Castagna, of MacKenzie, Castagna, Bennison & Gardner, Clear-water, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See*Rule 3, Florida Household Carrier’s Bureau, Tariff 11 (1969) (now Rule 25-5.168, Florida Public Service Commission (1971)); Fla.Stat. §§ 353.01, 353.02, F.S.A., (1973). See *also*Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Brewer, 258 So.2d 496 (Fla.App.2d 1972).

MANN, C. J., and McNULTY and BOARD MAN, JJ., concur.
#### Robert MARSDEN and Clair Marsden, his wife, Appellants, v. James H. McLENDON, Appellee.

No. 70-232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        91,891,271
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       18,104,440
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         18,608,644
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             125,943,070
<CASH>                                       1,303,739
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,376,473
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      29,842,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             165,337,309
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            104,269,283
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,754,504
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,641,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               165,337,309
<PREMIUMS>                                  17,620,184
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          8,056,400
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             110,699
<OTHER-INCOME>                               3,141,695
<BENEFITS>                                  11,940,589
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,271,407
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         6,239,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,477,094
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,172,536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,304,558
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,304,558
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .96
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thos. E. Capps, President and Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:



|1. |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December
31, 2002 and for the period then ended.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Thos. E. Capps                   
|-------------------------------------
|Thos. E. Capps                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 20, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID M. SOCKO, Respondent

v.
MID-ATLANTIC SYSTEMS OF CPA, INC., Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 544 MAL 2014
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 11th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED . The issues are:
(1) Did the Superior Court misconstrue the Uniform Written Obligations Act, 33 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 6 (West 2014) (“UWOA”) considering the UWOA is not a “substitute for consideration,” nor is it intended to “rectify a lack of consideration” as the Superior Court asserts, but instead, is a statute that merely prevents a party to a written agreement in which the party expresses an intention to be legally bound from later challenging that validity of the contract based upon lack of consideration? (2) Did the Superior Court erroneously rely upon allegedly analogous “seal” cases to support its determination that the UWOA does not provide consideration for a non-competition restrictive covenant entered into subsequent to the commencement of the employment relation, considering a seal on a document has long been held to input consideration, whereas, to the contrary, the UWOA does not input consideration, and the authority relied upon by the Superior Court did not support this conclusion[?] (3) Did the Superior Court impermissibly amend the UWOA under the guise of interpreting it? M.D. Appeal Dkt. 142 MAP 2014[544 MAL 2014] - 2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: The State of Texas v. Dennis Edward Gallien

Appellate case number: 01-19-00882-CR

Trial court case number: 1541083

Trial court: 339th District Court of Harris County

The State has filed a “Motion to Submit Appeal that is Given ‘Precedence in [this 

Court’s] docket’ by Statute.” The State’s motion is granted. 

The State’s appeal will be set for submission on the Court’s early February docket with 

the formal submission notice regarding details of the submission, including the panel assignment, 

to follow. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: Richard Hightower

Acting individually 

Date: December 10, 2020
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1650 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to exempt certain Alaska Native 

articles from prohibitions against sale of items containing nonedible migratory bird parts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2013 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to exempt certain 

Alaska Native articles from prohibitions against sale of 

items containing nonedible migratory bird parts, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM PROHIBITIONS FOR ALASKA 

4 NATIVE ARTICLES CONTAINING MIGRATORY 

5 BIRD PARTS. 

6 Section 2 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 

7 U.S.C. 703) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1650 IS

1 ‘‘(c) EXEMPTION FOR AUTHENTIC ALASKA NATIVE

2 ARTICLES OF HANDICRAFT OR CLOTHING.— 

3 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 

4 ‘‘(A) ALASKA NATIVE.—The term ‘Alaska 

5 Native’ means a person who is a member of any 

6 Native village, Village Corporation, or Regional 

7 Corporation, as those terms are defined in sec8 tion 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 

9 Act (43 U.S.C. 1602). 

10 ‘‘(B) ALASKA NATIVE HANDICRAFT.— 

11 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘Alaska 

12 Native handicraft’ means any handicraft or 

13 clothing item that— 

14 ‘‘(I) is composed, wholly or in a 

15 significant respect, of natural mate16 rials; and 

17 ‘‘(II) is produced, decorated, or 

18 fashioned— 

19 ‘‘(aa) by an Alaska Native; 

20 ‘‘(bb) in the exercise of tra21 ditional Alaska Native handi22 crafts; and 

23 ‘‘(cc) without the use of any 

24 pantograph or other mass copy25 ing device. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1650 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) INCLUSIONS.—The term ‘Alaska 

2 native handicraft’ includes— 

3 ‘‘(I) any weaving, carving, stitch4 ing, sewing, lacing, beading, drawing, 

5 or painting that meet the criteria de6 scribed in clause (i); or 

7 ‘‘(II) an item that combines the 

8 techniques described in subclause (I). 

9 ‘‘(2) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN ALASKA NATIVE

10 HANDICRAFTS.—Notwithstanding any other provi11 sion of this Act and subject to paragraph (3), noth12 ing in this Act prohibits the possession, offering for 

13 sale, sale, offering to barter, barter, offering to pur14 chase, purchase, delivery for shipment, shipment, 

15 causing to be shipped or delivered for transpor16 tation, transport, causing to be transported, car17 rying, causing to be carried, or receiving for ship18 ment, transportation, or carriage of any Alaska Na19 tive handicraft on the basis that the Alaska Native 

20 handicraft contains a nonedible migratory bird part. 

21 ‘‘(3) LIMITATION.—This subsection does not 

22 apply to any Alaska Native handicraft containing a 

23 part of a migratory bird that was taken in a waste24 ful manner.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS