alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CN.52 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3691
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 2010 Two Days Left to Mail Back 2010 Census Forms Residents Encouraged to Help Save up to $1.5 Billion in Taxpayer Money Today marks the two-day countdown for residents across America to mail back their 2010 Census questionnaires. Households that return their forms after Friday, April 16, will likely be visited by census workers, who begin May 1 going door to door to collect census responses. Residents are encouraged to promptly mail back their forms, because doing so would reduce the cost of administering the census by $1.5 billion — funds that would be given back to taxpayers. After the 2000 Census, the Census Bureau was able to return $305 million in savings to the federal Treasury, because mail response rates exceeded expectations — a move the Census Bureau would like to repeat in 2010. Each 1 percent increase in the national mail participation rate saves taxpayers $85 million by not sending census workers door to door from nonresponsive households. It costs 42 cents for people to mail back their form, compared with an average of $57 for census takers to visit each home and collect census data. “Mailing back your form saves taxpayers money and ensures your community's fair share of $400 billion in federal funds,” U.S. Census Bureau Director Robert Groves said. “Residents who miss the April 16 deadline should be prepared to get a knock on their doors between May and July.” Nationwide, about 67 percent of households have mailed back their census forms. In 2000, the mail participation rate was 72 percent. ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are used to apportion congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to tribal, state and local governments each year and to make decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census form is one of the shortest in U.S. history, consisting of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict confidentiality laws protect the respondents and the information they provide.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2303

J. W. CLEMMER,

Defendant - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL A. SCOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

and

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION; DAVID R. GOODE;

STEPHEN CRAIG TOBIAS; JON L. MANETTA; DONALD

W. MAYBERRY; WILLIAM E. HONEYCUTT; LEWIS D.

HALE; TIMOTHY A. HEILIG; C. D. VITTUR; D. D.

GRAAB; A. L. LUTTRELL; JERRY R. GRAY; W. F.

HENLEY; J. E. PAIR; LANDMARK COMMUNICATIONS,

INCORPORATED,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-522-2)

Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: April 30, 1999

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Johnson Webster, Heather Ann Mullen, David Nash Payne,

WILLIAMS, KELLY & GREER, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael

A. Scott, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Jerry W. Clemmer appeals from the district court’s

order allowing Appellee Michael A. Scott to file an untimely notice

of appeal. Because we have decided the underlying appeal on the

merits, see Scott v. Norfolk Southern Corp., No. 98-1098 (4th Cir.

Jan. 15, 1999) (unpublished), we dismiss this appeal as moot. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately set forth in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Marcel FORT, Petitioner, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, Respondent.

No. 66-840.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 18, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph B. Leonard, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1)             | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and                   
|--------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2)             | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                |                                                                                                                                                     
|August 13, 2003 | By:                                                                                                                                                 
|                |                                                                                                                                                     
|                |
# Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications.

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Beach First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 as
               filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/  Walter E. Standish, III 
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | Walter E. Standish, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer      
| |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | November 9, 2006             

| |  | /s/  Richard N. Burch        
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | Richard N. Burch             
| |  | Chief Financial Officer      
| |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
| |  | November 9, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, L.M. (Theo) de Kool, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 14, 2006                                              
|                                                                       
|/s/ L.M. (Theo) de Kool,                                               
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 29, 2014

p0922

Order 

Clerk

September 29, 2014

148720

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 148720

COA: 317538

Bay CC: 09-010143-FC

JOSHUA JAMES ARCHEY, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ DATCARD SYSTEMS, INC ., Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

PACSGEAR, INC., Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2013

- 1445

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 10

- CV

- 1288, Senior Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

P AUL A. S TEWART , Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. With him on the brief was C RAIG S. S UMMERS

.

W ILLMORE F. H OLBROW , III , Blakely Sokol o ff Taylor & Zafman LLP, of Los Angel es, California, argued for d efendant

- appellee. With him on the brief were D ENNIS G. M ARTIN and J AMES A HN

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , W ALLACH , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                           Subsidiaries of Registrant


     The registrant owns 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of
TruServ Real Estate Agency, Inc., TruServ Acceptance Company, TruServ Logistics
Company, and General Paint and Manufacturing Co., all Illinois corporations,
ServiStar Paint Company and Advocate Services Incorporated, both Pennsylvania
Corporations, True Value.com, a Delaware Corporation and indirectly through
TruServ Real Estate Agency, Inc., 100% of the issued and outstanding capital
stock of True Value de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican Corporation, Mary Green,
LLC, a Delaware Corporation, and is the sole member of True Specialty Company,
LLC.  The accounts of these subsidiaries have been consolidated with the
registrant's in December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999.

     In January 1992, the registrant formed a Canadian subsidiary, Cotter Canada
Hardware & Variety Company, Inc., owning 100% of the issued and outstanding
capital stock.  Indirectly, through this subsidiary, the registrant owns 100% of
the issued and outstanding voting Preferred Stock of the Canadian cooperative,
TruServ Canada Cooperative, Inc.
#### In re ESTATE of Arthur W. SMITH, Deceased. Robert Eugene SMITH and Charles Curtis Smith, Appellants, v. FLORIDA SHERIFFS BOYS RANCH et al., Appellees.

No. 73-177.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.63 **Contact:**  Robert CrockettPublic Information Office
(202) 384-6284
John Willse
Media Specialist
(216) 338-5916
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, APRIL 5, 2010 Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to Cleveland Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why “I count!” and view messages from other road tour participants.
    
 For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
254 La. 123

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond Eugene CRUMM and Wilbert James Smith.

No. 49880.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 5, 1969.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph F. Becker, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 13th day of October, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondents through their attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 130176 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### MAXINE WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 130176 COA: 263890 WCAC: 03-000246 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk
#### Betty June WADDELL et al., Appellants, v. Robert SELIG et al., Appellees.

No. 71-132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 25, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
        officers of Amacore Group, Inc.., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
        does
        hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the
“Form
        10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
        in
        the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
        May 16, 2007
 */s/
                    Clark A.
                    Marcus*
                  Clark
                    A. Marcus
                  Chief
                    Executive Officer
 
 Dated:
        May 16, 2007


/s/*James
                    L.
                    Koenig*
                  James
                    L. Koenig
                  Acting
                    Chief Financial Officer****
EXHIBIT 21
 Subsidiaries of Registrant
 State of
    
    PercentageCompany Name
    
    Incorporation
    
    OwnershipCICA Life Insurance Company of America
(CICA)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% DirectCitizens Academy, LLC
    
    Texas
    
    100% DirectCitizens National Life Insurance Company (CNLIC)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectComputing Technology, Inc.
(CTI)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% IndirectInsurance Investors, Inc. (III)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectIntegrity Capital Corporation (ICC)
    
    Indiana
    
    87% Direct13% IndirectIntegrity Capital Insurance Company (ICIC)
    
    Indiana
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Life Insurance Company (SPLIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Fire Insurance Company (SPFIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% Indirect
CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 15, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Nikhil A. MehtaNikhil A. MehtaChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-93,763-01, WR-93,763-02, & WR-93,763-03

EX PARTE MARQUISE JEROME DAVIS, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W14-40153-M(A), W14-40269-M(A), & W14-75213-M(A)

IN THE 194TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

In three cause numbers, Applicant’s community supervision was revoked and Applicant was

adjudicated guilty. He was convicted of burglary of a habitation and received concurrent sentences

of 15 years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Davis v. State, Nos.

05-18-00100-CR, 05-18-00101-CR, and 05-18-00102-CR (Tex. App.–Dallas March 27, 2019) (not

designated for publication). Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the

county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07. 

The district clerk properly forwarded these applications to this Court under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(5). However, the record reflects that the last filing in the trial court
before the records were forwarded to this Court was the State’s Response which noted that further

information was required from trial counsel. Accordingly, we remand this application to the trial

court to complete its evidentiary investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the

record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to

hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants

to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent at the hearing. See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall

immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: August 24, 2022

Do not publish