alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011309EN.01000101.xml

| 21.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6141 — China National Agrochemical Corporation/Koor Industries/Makhteshim Agan Industries)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 309/01

On 3 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6141. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6141. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document

Exhibit 10.13
AMENDMENT TO
2014 PG&E CORPORATION LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARD AGREEMENT


The Non-Annual Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated March 1, 2021 (the “Agreement”) between Patricia K. Poppe (the “Participant”) and PG&E Corporation (the “Corporation”) under the 2014 PG&E Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) that provides for settlement in shares of common stock (“Stock”) of the Corporation, is hereby amended as described below, effective as of the date on which the Participant consents to such amendment, with respect to such portion of the award as may vest or has vested on or after January 1, 2022:
1. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, the Corporation may withhold shares of Stock or otherwise account for the tax obligations of the Corporation or any of its affiliates with respect to the grant of shares of Stock by considering applicable withholding rates, including the maximum applicable statutory withholding rates, taking into account any social security and Medicare taxes due under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act and the California State Disability Insurance tax.
2.With respect to that portion of the award under the Agreement that vested in January, 2022, the Corporation shall re-calculate the applicable California state withholding obligations taking into account the maximum state statutory withholding rate, and the undersigned Participant hereby authorizes and directs the Corporation and its agents and representatives to take such actions as may be necessary to transfer such additional number of Participant’s shares held directly or indirectly in brokerage accounts as may be necessary to satisfy such state withholding obligations as directed, and remit payment of additional state withholdings equal to the fair value of the transferred shares to the applicable authorities.  The undersigned acknowledges that the Corporation shall determine the fair value of any transferred shares based on  the closing price of a share of PG&E Corporation common stock on September 15, 2022, which was the date such amendment to the Agreement was approved by the PG&E Corporation Board of Directors.
3.This amendment to the Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment effective as of the date set forth below.
PG&E CORPORATION
			
	














By        /s/ JULIUS COX            
Julius Cox
Executive Vice President – People, Shared Services and Supply Chain
PARTICIPANT


    /s/ PATRICIA K. POPPE            
Patricia K. Poppe
Date:      9/22/22        
			
	



2
#### John Fite ROBERTSON, as Administrator Ad Litem of the Estate of Lota C. Mundy, Deceased, Appellant, v. NEW COLLEGE, INCORPORATED, Appellee.

No. 72-288.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 13, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
260 La. 408

#### William WOOTEN v. Howard V. WIMBERLY, Jr.

No. 52012.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 17, 1972.

In re: William Wooten applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 254 So.2d 120.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
No. 11107.

#### Steagall *v.*Bannon.

Decided December 14, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Scioto county.

*Mr. James S. Thomas,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Oscar W. Newman,*for defendant in error.

Judgment 'affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
260 La. 400

#### Priestly VERDUN et al. v. SCALLON BROS. CONTRACTORS, INC., Intervenor, Board of Commissioners for the Atchafalaya Basin Levee District.

No. 51955.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 6, 1972.

In re: Priestly Verdun, Sedonia Verdun, Lucy Verdun and Anna V. Davis, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Mary. 255 So.2d 808.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Connecticut Light and Power
Company (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl
W. Grise, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and John H. Forsgren,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

/s/ Cheryl W. Grise
    (Signature)
    Cheryl W. Grise
    Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and
will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONE MILLS
CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED JANAURY 3, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
(In thousands, except earnings per share data)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000023304
<NAME>                        CONE MILLS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-3-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-3-1999
<CASH>                                             639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,500
<INVENTORY>                                    120,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,746
<PP&E>                                         469,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 488,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,710
<BONDS>                                        161,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     38,395
<COMMON>                                         2,543
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   488,517
<SALES>                                        728,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               728,626
<CGS>                                          635,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  635,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (12,113)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,768)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (7,907)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,651)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,651)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.37)
        


</TABLE>
No. 11231.

#### Glenn et al. *v.*Eicher, Admr., et al.

Decided January 25, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. John J.*Gasser, for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Closs & Leubbert*and *Mr. Jacob Krummel,*for defendants *554in, error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., .Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Barbara Ann BILGER a/k/a Barbara A. Newton, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-912.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 1971.

Law Offices of Alex D. Finch, Clear-water, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

MANN, Judge.

The trial judge did not follow Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, and the guilty plea received cannot stand without a record supporting its voluntariness. Appellant’s contention that she was promised probation if she would waive extradition from Ohio and plead guilty is disputed by the State, which claims that no promises were made. It is clear, however, that the State’s agents discussed probation with appellant’s Ohio counsel, were advised that she would be accepted as a probationer there and there is here at least the degree of misunderstanding present in Brown v. State, Fla. 1971, 245 So.2d 41.

Reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the guilty plea.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.
#### STARKVILLE COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY v. Mrs. Emmie RUTHERFORD.

No. 47024.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 26, 1973.

Tubb & Stevens, H. Lee Morrison, West Point, for appellant.

Walter Buchanan Meek, Eupora, for appellee.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and RODGERS, PATTERSON, INZER and BROOM, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Webster County; Marshall Perry, Judge.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 24
                                
               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                
                                
                                
     We   consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the
registration  statement of Continental Materials Corporation  and
Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 33-23671) of our report  dated
February  28,  1997  on our audits of the consolidated  financial
statements   and  financial  statement  schedule  of  Continental
Materials  Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December  28,  1996
and  December  30, 1995, and for the three years  in  the  period
ended  December  28,  1996, which reports are  included  in  this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.




                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Chicago, Illinois
March 26, 1997
#### Archie STUART et ux. v. J. E. CARTER et al.

No. 50328.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 26, 1978.

Edward L. Cates, John C. Underwood, Jr., Jackson, for appellants.

Green, Cheney, Hughes & McKibben, Charles E. Hughes, Jackson, for appellees.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LS Power Funding Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas F. Schwartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ Thomas F. Schwartz
Thomas F. Schwartz
Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2002
#### William W. BEARD, Appellant, v. Doris E. BEARD, Appellee.

No. 77-923.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 31, 1978.

*1314James H. McAnly, Arcadia, for appellant.

RYDER, Judge.

Mr. Beard appeals the award to his wife of the real property and certain of the personal property of the parties, the amount of permanent alimony awarded to her, and the requirement that he pay certain debts, a portion of his wife’s attorney’s fees, and court costs in connection with the dissolution of the parties’ marriage. Except with respect to the award to the wife of all personal property located in, on and around the marital home, we find no error or abuse of judicial discretion.

The wife claimed and proved a special equity in the marital home. She also sought the award of certain specified pieces of personal property — certain automobiles and an insurance policy — which she was awarded by stipulation and which are not in issue on this appeal. However, there was no plea for the personal property in and around the marital home in either the husband’s petition for dissolution or in the wife’s counterpetition. Further, there was no evidence or testimony offered regarding this property at the final hearing.

A trial court may not dispose of property belonging to the parties as an incident to a divorce in the absence of an agreement between the parties or an appropriate pleading for such relief. *Helsel v. Helsel,*138 So.2d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). There being no such agreement or pleading here, that portion of the final judgment of dissolution awarding the personal property in, on and around the marital home to the wife must be reversed. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES, J., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 31(b) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED I, David E. Mangum, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CheckFree Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing equivalent functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: February 8, 2005 /s/ David E. Mangum
David E. Mangum
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
CheckFree Corporation
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

JIMMY JONES

- SCOTT SR. , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 22

- 2831

[ February 16, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Frank David Ledee

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 86

- 012809

- CF

- 10A

.
Jimmy Jones

- Scott Sr.

, Blountstown , pro se.

No appearance required for appell ee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C IKLIN , C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Social Security Administration

          - [Docket No. SSA-2018-0036]

# AGENCY:

Social Security Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board Membership.

                    Title 5, U.S. Code, 4314 (c)(4), requires that the appointment of Performance Review Board members be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     before service on said Board begins.                

The following persons will serve on the Performance Review Board which oversees the evaluation of performance appraisals of Senior Executive Service members of the Social Security Administration:

Bonnie Doyle

Stephen Evangelista *

Joanne Gasparini

Erik Hansen

John Lee

Joseph Lytle

Dan Parry

Van Roland *

Patrice Stewart

* New Member

Marianna LaCanfora,

Deputy Commissioner for Human Resources.

[FR Doc. 2018-16945 Filed 8-7-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
# CA2011278EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 278/1

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION

EPSO/AD/185/10

ENGLISH-LANGUAGE (EN) TRANSLATORS (AD 5)

(2011/C 278 A/01)

Option 1

| ALEXANDER | Daniel |
| --- | --- |
| AMOS | Rhona Margaret |
| BARRATT | Charlotte |
| BELL | Alexander |
| BIRDSEYE | Kevin |
| BRADBURY | Alex |
| CAMBAS | Caroline |
| DUDENHOEFER | Marina |
| DYER-MEENENGA | Charlotte Serena Kate |
| ETSE | Sophie |
| HARTNELL | Alan |
| HUDSON | Kate |
| MAMDANI | Geoffrey Aasif |
| PARTRIDGE | Laura |
| PORTER | Ryan |
| PRICE | Ross |
| ROWE | David |
| SAVILLE | Melanie |

ALEXANDER

Daniel

AMOS

Rhona Margaret

BARRATT

Charlotte

BELL

Alexander

BIRDSEYE

Kevin

BRADBURY

Alex

CAMBAS

Caroline

DUDENHOEFER

Marina

DYER-MEENENGA

Charlotte Serena Kate

ETSE

Sophie

HARTNELL

Alan

HUDSON

Kate

MAMDANI

Geoffrey Aasif

PARTRIDGE

Laura

PORTER

Ryan

PRICE

Ross

ROWE

David

SAVILLE

Melanie

Option 2

| BEESON | David |
| --- | --- |
| COYARD-GANDER | Alison |
| EARLS | Selim |
| GERENCSER | Ádám |
| GRAY | Sarah |
| HAYES | Laura |
| MOORE | Kerry |
| MOORE | Richard |
| PAINE | Eleanor |
| PARRY | Matthew |
| PEAKE | Marc |
| PREECE | David |
| SANDERS | Thomas |
| TINDLE | Suzanne |
| TINGA | Jens |
| TOWNEND | Paul Morris |
| WALLER | Sarah |

BEESON

David

COYARD-GANDER

Alison

EARLS

Selim

GERENCSER

Ádám

GRAY

Sarah

HAYES

Laura

MOORE

Kerry

MOORE

Richard

PAINE

Eleanor

PARRY

Matthew

PEAKE

Marc

PREECE

David

SANDERS

Thomas

TINDLE

Suzanne

TINGA

Jens

TOWNEND

Paul Morris

WALLER

Sarah

The reserve list will be valid until 14 July 2012 and may be extended.

14 July 2012

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
# C_2012168EN.01000601.xml

| 14.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/6

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2012/C 168/06

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition

EPSO/AST/121/12 — Conference technicians (AST 3)

The competition notice is published in 23 languages in Official Journal C 168 A of 14 June 2012.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://www.eu-careers.info

---