alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012001EN.01000201.xml

| 4.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 January 2012

2012/C 1/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3014 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4360 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83510 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9283 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2183 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7350 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,688 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6993 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4744 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3185 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4505 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2595 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3170 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1102 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6541 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6737 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 496,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,4925 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1941 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5360 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 017,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0857 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,914 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,3199 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,916 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4069 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,9613 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,1300 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3014

JPY

Japanese yen

99,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4360

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83510

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9283

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2183

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7350

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,688

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6993

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4744

RON

Romanian leu

4,3185

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4505

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2595

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3170

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1102

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6541

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6737

KRW

South Korean won

1 496,00

ZAR

South African rand

10,4925

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1941

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5360

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 017,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0857

PHP

Philippine peso

56,914

RUB

Russian rouble

41,3199

THB

Thai baht

40,916

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4069

MXN

Mexican peso

17,9613

INR

Indian rupee

69,1300

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Asian Business Ownership
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-69 **Contact:**  Briana KayaPublic Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, APRIL 21, 2011 Media Advisory — U.S. Census Bureau to Release New Data About Asian-Owned Businesses What:
 
 When:
  Who:
 
 Details:
 Audio conference ― access information      Online presentation ― access information
Please login early, as some setup is required.  https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/      http://livewrite.nccsite.com/view/cb0428
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
No. 11505.

#### Sterling *v.*Gillespie.

Decided January 25, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Wood county.

*Mr. John W. Grabiel*and *Messrs. James & Kelly,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. N. R. JJarrington,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J:, Crew, 'Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2012226EN.01000501.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 July 2012

2012/C 226/08

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2317 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 96,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4390 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78295 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5008 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4730 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,310 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6966 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1275 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6110 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2386 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,1807 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2407 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5544 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5287 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5407 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 402,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1634 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8591 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5252 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 660,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8938 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,639 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,7060 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,836 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4875 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4814 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,1560 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2317

JPY

Japanese yen

96,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4390

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78295

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5008

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4730

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,310

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6966

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1275

RON

Romanian leu

4,6110

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2386

AUD

Australian dollar

1,1807

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2407

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5544

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5287

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5407

KRW

South Korean won

1 402,30

ZAR

South African rand

10,1634

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8591

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5252

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 660,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8938

PHP

Philippine peso

51,639

RUB

Russian rouble

39,7060

THB

Thai baht

38,836

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4875

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4814

INR

Indian rupee

68,1560

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
ORDER PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Cause No. DA 21-0645

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

vs.

JUNE LEE WOLVERINE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

 

______________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s counsel’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s counsel is granted an extension of 

time to and including April 6, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s 

Opening Brief on appeal. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2023

02/28/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0645
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.141 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 2010 2010 Census: Hawaii Approaches Its 2000 Mail Participation Rate As of Friday, April 16, Hawaii is just two percentage points away from matching the mail participation rate it achieved in the 2000 Census, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today.  New rates released today show that 66 percent of Hawaiians have mailed back their forms so far, compared with 68 percent in 2000. The nation as a whole — at 69 percent — is still three percentage points away from matching the mail response rate achieved in 2000 (72 percent). A number of counties and cities across the country have already matched or exceeded their Census 2000 rates (see: http://2010.census.gov/news/xls/match_surpassed_4-16.xls [Excel] for the full list). “If you mail back your 2010 Census today you can ensure that your household is counted,” U.S. Census Bureau Director Robert Groves said. Households that normally pick up their mail from a post office box are already slated for in-person follow-up from census workers. The rates for all states, counties, places, towns and townships are updated each afternoon through April 23 at 4:00 p.m. on the Take 10 Challenge Map (http://2010.census.gov/2010census/take10map/). A final rate will be announced May 3. ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are used to apportion congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to tribal, state and local governments each year and to make decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census form is one of the shortest in U.S. history, consisting of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict confidentiality laws protect the respondents and the information they provide.
 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office/troubleshoot/excel/get-latest-excel-viewer
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### The Toledo Soldiers' Memorial Association *v.*City of Toledo.

*Supreme Court*— iReversal *by agreement of parties.*

(No. 18108

Decided June 17, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Lucas county.

*Mr. Ralph Emery*and *Mr. Charles P. Carroll,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. F. M. Dotson,*director of law,, and *Mr. M. S. Dodd,*for defendant in error.

This day came the plaintiff in error, by its attorneys, and the defendant in error the city of Toledo, by its attorneys, and represented to the court that an amicable settlement of the several matters in controversy, as appears in the pleadings and record in said cause, had been agreed upon; and whereas in order to carry into effect and complete the terms of such settlement it would require the action of the court of appeals of Lucas county, Ohio; and whereas the said plaintiff in error and said defendant in error, by their *826said attorneys, request and consent that the said cause be reversed and remanded to the said court of appeals for the purpose of completing and carrying into effect such settlement:

It is ordered that the judgment and decree of the court of appeals of Lucas county, Ohio, mentioned and referred to in the petition in error in the above entitled cause and proceeding in error, be and the same is hereby, reversed and said cause remanded to the court of appeals for the purpose of further proceedings in said court of appeals carrying into effect the terms of such settlement with such order and decree as the parties agree upon and said court may approve.

The action of this court in so reversing said judgment and remanding said cáse is taken solely upon the request and consent of said parties as aforesaid without this court passing upon or determining the matters complained of in the said petition in error or involved in the record and proceeding herein except as aforesaid.

*Judgment reversed by stipulation of parties.*
Document

Exhibit 10.1




September 13, 2022


Michael Duncan
Via e-mail delivery


Dear Michael


Congratulations on your new appointment within the Travel + Leisure Co. family of companies! You have been recognized as an integral part of the success of our company. This letter confirms your Executive Leadership level appointment to SVP, Chief Accounting Officer effective September 30, 2022.


Your base salary will increase to $400,000 effective on October 3, 2022. You will be eligible to participate in the Company's 2022 Annual Incentive Plan, provided that you meet our performance measures or other such criteria as the Company determines in its sole discretion. The plan currently provides for a target payment of 50% of your eligible earnings (as defined in the plan), based on the Company achieving financial goals. The Annual Incentive Plan distribution is typically in the first quarter of the following year.


While there is no guarantee of future awards, your position continues to be eligible for a long term incentive plan grant on an annual basis. Award values vary from year to year, are subject to change without notice and are generally contingent upon such criteria as personal performance, scope of responsibility and company financial performance, subject to the approval of the Travel + Leisure Co. Compensation Committee. Your next eligibility for an annual LTIP award will occur in 2023.


Subject to Compensation Committee approval, you will also receive a special one-time LTIP award in November 2022 with an expected grant date value of $250,000. This special one-time LTIP award will vest pro-rata on an annual basis over a four year period subject to continued employment in good standing.


You continue to be eligible to participate in the company’s Health and Welfare Benefits and the company’s 401(k) plan managed by Merrill Lynch.


As part of our executive perquisites program you continue to be eligible to participate in the following: Travel + Leisure Co.’s Executive Level Corporate Fleet Program which provides a Company automobile and our Officer Deferred Compensation Program which provides a dollar-for-dollar match of up to six percent of your compensation as described in the Plan. Our executive perquisites program also includes premium class air travel and an executive physical every other year.


Thank you for the integral role you play in achieving our mission to put the world on vacation. I look forward to your leadership and your meaningful contributions to our continued success.


Sincerely,


/s/ Michael Hug
Michael Hug
Chief Financial Officer


Accepted:


/s/ Michael Duncan


Michael Duncan










Travel + Leisure Co. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive Orlando, FL 32821
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6984

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIS ALONZO GEORGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,

Chief District Judge. (CR-00-25, CA-03-13-2-BO)

Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willis Alonzo George, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Willis Alonzo George seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct.

1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S.

941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that George has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
From: Rahul Pendse <RPendse@trinityconsultants.com>

Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 1:12 PM

To: Fortin, Kelly

Cc: Land, Eva; Kathryn Maness (Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com); Carlson, 

Sara; Grygar, Bill

Subject: Revisions to the Proposed Main Engine BACT Limits in BlackHawk and 

BlackHornet PSD/Title V Permit Applications

Attachments: BHBH BACT Hybird Approach (07182014).pdf

Hello Kelly,

Per your phone call with Sara Carlson, please find the ‘Revisions to the Proposed Main Engine BACT 

Limits in BlackHawk and BlackHornet PSD/Title V Permit Applications’ memorandum attached herewith. 

Note that this memo is very similar to the one prepared and submitted for Bob Douglas PSD/Title V 

Permit Application. The key difference is the BACT limits in the attached memo are based on the actual 

stack test data for the main engines on the BlackHawk. Anadarko and Trinity will be happy to discuss 

how the proposed BACT limits were developed. Please feel free to contact Sara Carlson or I if you have 

any questions or if we could be of any assistance.

Thanks and have a great weekend!

Rahul

................................................................................................................

Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants – Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225-346-4003 | Mobile: 714-454-0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received

this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any

computer.

_________________________________________________________________________
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**SECTION        906 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)    | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,                  2006 fully                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the                  Securities                  Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    | the                  information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                  of The                  Amacore Group, Inc.          |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |

|   | /s/                  *James                  L. Koenig         *James                  L. KoenigActing                  Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the

                United States:  Second Quarter 1997 and 1996



(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)





                                    Second    Second   Standard

                                    quarter   quarter  error on   Standard     1997

Type                                 1997      1996      1997     error on   Percent

                                   estimate  estimate  estimate difference  of total



All housing units.................  115,722   114,207       237        336       100



  Occupied........................  102,046   101,082       246        348        88

    Owner occupied................   67,094    66,147       241        340        58

    Renter occupied...............   34,952    34,935       198        279        30



  Vacant..........................   13,676    13,125       132        186        12

    Year-round vacant.............   10,356     9,949       116        163         9

      For rent....................    3,043     2,975        64         91         3

      For sale only...............    1,107       997        39         54         1

      Rented or sold,

      awaiting occupancy..........      905       894        35         50         1

      Held off market.............    5,301     5,083        85        118         5

        For occasional use........    1,920     1,678        51         70         2

        Temporarily occupied

        by persons with

        usual residence elsewhere.      960       883        36         50         1

        For other reasons.........    2,421     2,522        58         82         2



    Seasonal vacant...............    3,320     3,176        67         94         3

    

Source: U.S. Census Bureau