alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11.1

                                   ACCOM, INC.
            STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                BASIC AND DILUTED
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Three months ended    Nine months ended
                                                                ------------------    -----------------
                                                                June 30,   June 28,  June 30,   June 28,
                                                                  1998       1997     1998        1997
                                                                --------------------------------------- 
<S>                                                             <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>     
Net income (loss)                                               $  (952)   $    77   $(1,388)   $(4,678)
                                                                ======================================= 

Shares used in computation of net income (loss) per share:
    Basic
       Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding        6,672      6,592     6,658      6,577
                                                                --------------------------------------- 
           Shares used in basic net income (loss) per share
           computation                                            6,672      6,592     6,658      6,577
                                                                ======================================= 
    Diluted:
       Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding        6,672      6,592     6,658      6,577
       Net effect of dilutive stock options                        --          273      --         --
                                                                --------------------------------------- 
           Shares used in diluted net income (loss) per share
           computation                                            6,672      6,865     6,658      6,577
                                                                ======================================= 

Net income (loss) per share:
    Basic                                                       $ (0.14)   $  0.01   $ (0.21)   $ (0.71)
                                                                ======================================= 
    Diluted                                                     $ (0.14)   $  0.01   $ (0.21)   $ (0.71)
                                                                ======================================= 
</TABLE>
#### William J. LEWIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-895.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 2, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit 32     **Section 1350 Certifications.

----

**Exhibit        32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the        Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Beach First National Bancshares,        Inc. (the “Company”), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this        certification:                   

1.   The        quarterly report of the Company for the period endedSeptember30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission        on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the        financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                                                                            /s/ Walter E. Standish,        III          

                                                                                                             Walter E. Standish, III                                                                                                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                                                                                            November 9,        2007 

                                                                                                          /s/ Gary S.        Austin          

                                                                                                          Gary S.        Austin                                                                                                          Chief Financial        Officer

                                                                                                                 November 9, 2007
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leroy BROWN.

No. 59919.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

Larry D. Book, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., John W. Sinquefield, Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### James K. MANVILLE, Appellant, v. Howard B. GASKILL, Henry Grien and Eileen Grien, his wife, and Charlotte Fairweather, Appellees.

No. 2671.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 22, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:
            1965 to 1996


            First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2

1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4

\r Revised.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Corning Natural Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2011 (the "Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael I. German, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and I, Firouzeh Sarhangi, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Dated: December 28, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                             1
<CURRENCY>                               U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           APR-01-2000               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-2000               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1                         1
<CASH>                                     1,123,000                 1,123,000
<SECURITIES>                                       0                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 33,000                    33,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  312,000                   312,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              35,000                    35,000
<PP&E>                                        34,000                    34,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,537,000                 1,537,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        772,000                   772,000
<BONDS>                                            0                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0                         0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,000                     1,000
<COMMON>                                     133,000                   133,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   631,000                   631,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,537,000                 1,537,000
<SALES>                                       59,000                   365,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              59,000                   365,000
<CGS>                                         25,000                    47,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             708,000                 1,300,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (13,000)                  (22,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (829,000)               (1,291,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                         0
<CHANGES>                                          0                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (829,000)               (1,291,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.32)                    (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.32)                    (0.49)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Conolog Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert
S. Benou Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The
 Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, as amended; and                  
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |                                                 
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------
|Dated:
 October 29, 2007 | /s/
 Robert Benou                               
|                         |                                                 
|                         | Name:
 Robert Benou                             
|                         | Title: Chairman, Chief
 Executive Officer, Chief
|                         | Financial
 Officer and Treasurer                

The foregoing certification is
being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

FAVIO ROJAS, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0824 PRPC

Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2013-004779-001

The Honorable Phemonia L. Miller, Commissioner

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Lisa Marie Martin

Counsel for Respondent

Favio Rojas, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 5-15-2018
STATE v. ROJAS

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jon W. Thompson, Judge Peter B. Swann, and Judge James 

P. Beene delivered the decision of the Court.

P E R C U R I U M:

¶1 Petitioner Favio Rojas seeks review of the superior court’s 

order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to 

Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 576-77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s 

burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the 

petition. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not shown an abuse of discretion. 

¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny relief.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.132 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3691
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 2010 2010 Census: Indiana Approaches Its 2000 Mail Participation Rate Census Director says: “Fill Out Your Form and Mail it Back Today!” As of Thursday, April 15, Indiana is just two percentage point away from matching the mail participation rate it achieved in the 2000 Census, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today.  New rates released today show that 74 percent of Hoosiers have mailed back their forms so far, compared with 76 percent in 2000. The nation as a whole -- at 68 percent -- is still four percentage points away from matching the mail response rate achieved in 2000 (72 percent). “We're asking all Indiana residents who've received a census form to fill it out and mail it back today," said U.S. Census Bureau director Robert Groves. "Your actions can save taxpayers a significant sum of money because mailing the form back is much easier and less expensive than having a census worker come to your door to complete the form with you.” The U.S. Census Bureau is emphasizing the Friday, April 16, mail deadline because forms put in the mail by tomorrow will likely be received and processed in time to delete those households from the list of addresses it will visit starting May 1. Households that normally pick up their mail from a post office box are already slated for follow-up in May from census workers. If successful, Indiana can join North Carolina, South Carolina, Kentucky and Tennessee on the list of states that have met or surpassed their 2000 mail-back participation rate. The rates for all states, counties, places, towns and townships are updated each afternoon through April 23 at 4:00 p.m. on the Take 10 Challenge Map (http://2010.census.gov/2010census/take10map/). A final rate will be announced May 3. ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are used to apportion congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to tribal, state and local governments each year and to make decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census form is one of the shortest in U.S. history, consisting of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict confidentiality laws protect the respondents and the information they provide.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Irene J. HUGHES, Appellant, v. Edward STONE, Jr., Jacqueline M. Stone, and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellees.

No. 70-948.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 3, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; L. Clayton Nance, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          OCT-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               OCT-31-1999
[CASH]                                             200
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                   24,923
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                    436,155
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               461,278
[PP&E]                                         295,497
[DEPRECIATION]                                  29,900
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 753,271
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                        2,079,042
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                         6,914
[OTHER-SE]                                   1,552,018
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   753,271
[SALES]                                        148,429
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               148,429
[CGS]                                           54,280
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   54,280
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                             1,325,553
[LOSS-PROVISION]                           (1,231,404)
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                             109,312
[INCOME-PRETAX]                            (1,340,716)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                        (1,340,716)
[DISCONTINUED]                                 110,348
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                               (1,230,368)
[EPS-BASIC]                                     (0.18)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (0.18)
</TABLE>
#### Lawrence COUSINEAU v. STATE.

No. 35831.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 190 So.2d 366.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Paul J.B. Murphy, III, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A ofNew World Restaurant Group, Inc.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)            Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

c)            Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)            Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
|   | Dated:  May 6, 2005             | By: /s/ PAUL J. B. MURPHY, III |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul J.B. Murphy, III                |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----