alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B E R T HA AL I C I A R E YN OS O D E T OR O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72103 A ge nc yN o. A 056- 510- 802 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2011 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , C L IF T O N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B ertha A l i ci a R eyno so de T oro, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s pro se for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her appe a lf r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on f i ndi ng he ri na dm i s s i bl e f ore nga gi ng i n a l i e n s m u g g l i n g . We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. 

# FI LED APR13 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72103 2 W e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w R e yn o s o d e T o r o ’s c o n te n tio n th a t s h e is e l i gi bl e f oraw a i ve rof

i na dm i s s i bi l i tyunde r8 U . S . C . § 1182( d) ( 11) be c aus e s he f a i l e d t o e xhaus the ra dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e di e s byr a i s i ng thi s c ont e nt i on be f or e the B I A . See B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d67 4, 67 7-78 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of The Hartcourt Companies, Inc.. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Victor
      Zhou and Yungeng Hu, Chief Executive Officer, and President and Chief Financial
      Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                October 22, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Victor ZhouVictor
                Zhou
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              
              /s/
                Yungeng Hu
              Yungeng
                Hu
              President
                & Chief Financial Officer




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0862**
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation ) ) Under Contract No. W91 lW6-05-D-0003 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60565
Craig A. Holman, Esq.

Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Kara M. Klaas, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute which is the subject ofthe appeal having been settled, the appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within one year ofthe date ofthis Order. Dated: 27 July 2017

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 60565, Appeal ofAuroraFlight Sciences Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CN.57 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, APRIL 30, 2010 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Director to Provide Update on Status of 2010 Census Operations Members of the media may also participate by telephone. (Please dial-in early to allow time for the operator to place you in the call.) Dial-in number: 888-603-8938
    Passcode: 2010 CENSUS
     Please RSVP by 9 a.m., Monday, May 3, to the Public Information Office at 301-763-3691 or to pio.2010@census.gov.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                           Subsidiaries of Registrant


          The registrant owns 100% of the issued and outstanding Capital Stock
of TruServ Real Estate Agency, Inc., TruServ Acceptance Company, TruServ
Logistics Company, and General Paint and Manufacturing Co., all Illinois
corporations, ServiStar Paint Company and Advocate Services Incorporated, both
Pennsylvania Corporations, and indirectly through TruServ Real Estate Agency,
Inc., 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of True Value de Mexico,
S.A. de C.V., a Mexican Corporation, Mary Green, LLC, a Delaware Corporation,
and is the sole member of True Specialty Company, LLC. The accounts of these
subsidiaries have been  consolidated with the registrant's in December 31, 1998,
and December 31, 1997.
        
          In January 1992, the registrant formed a Canadian subsidiary, Cotter 
Canada Hardware & Variety Company, Inc., owning 100% of the issued and 
outstanding Capital Stock. Indirectly, through this subsidiary, the registrant 
owns 100% of the issued and outstanding voting Preferred Stock of the 
Canadian cooperative, Cotter Canada Hardware and Variety Cooperative, 
Inc.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned officers of Cray Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, to such officers’ knowledge,that:(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Dated: August 7, 2007               /s/ PETER J. UNGARO           Peter J. Ungaro      Chief Executive Officer and President           /s/ BRIAN C. HENRY           Brian C. Henry      Chief Financial Officer       The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
# C_2011336EN.01000202.xml

| 17.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6354 — CVC/Virgin Group Holdings/Virgin Active Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 336/04

On 14 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6354. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6354. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### In re INTERDICTION OF Mrs. Minnie Foster REDMOND.

No. 61286.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Willie Floyd Redmond, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of St. Helena. 351 So.2d 1256.

Writ denied.

DIXON and TATE, JJ., would grant the writ.
#### John R. KISHEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-4.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 8, 1974.

Louis Vernell, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Thomas M. Carney and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

MAGER, Judge.

Defendant appeals convictions of possession of marijuana and resisting an officer with violence to his person. The conviction came as a result of a warrantless search of a building owned by defendant’s father located some 30 feet from the building in which defendant and his father occupied as a residence.

We are of the opinion under the circumstances and facts of this case, that the building in question, although not occupied as a “residence” was part of the curti-lage included within the protection of the Fourth Amendment. Ashby v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 400. Furthermore, the evidence not having demonstrated any exemption from the requirements of the Fourth Amendment, a search warrant was necessary. Ashby v. State, supra. See also State v. Hetzko, Fla.App. 1973, 283 So.2d 49. In addition, we hold that the defendant, as a member of the family of the owner of the building, was legally on the premises which was subject to the search and therefore had the standing to attack the validity of the search under the decision in Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960). See also State v. Leveson, Fla.1963, 151 So.2d 283; Robinson v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 29; Russell v. State, Fla.App.1972, 270 So.2d 462; Godbee v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 441; McCain v. State, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 841; Tribue v. State, Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 630; Ashby v. State, supra; 78 A.L.R.2d 246, *415267; cf. Moore v. Wainwright, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 262.

The evidence which was illegally seized should have been suppressed; defendant’s arrest haying been predicated upon an illegal search and seizure such arrest was .unlawful thereby rendering defective the charge of resisting an officer. State v. Rameriz, Fla.App.1973, 284 So.2d 241; Kirby v. State, Fla.App.1969, 217 So.2d 619. See also 5 Am.Jur.2d Arrest § 94.

The convictions appealed from are reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 15

September 8, 2000

Bradlees, Inc.
One Bradlees Circle
Braintree, Massachusetts 02184

We have made a review, in accordance with the standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim
financial information of Bradlees, Inc. and subsidiaries, for the 13 and 26-week
periods ended July 29, 2000 and July 31, 1999 as indicated in our report dated
August 16, 2000. Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 29, 2000, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-38806 and
333-77555.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

                                              /s/ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                                     166
# C_2012057EN.01000301.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2012/C 57/03

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Spain

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Spain

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Spain

Subject of commemoration: UNESCO's World Natural and Cultural Heritage Sites — The Burgos Cathedral

Description of the design: The coin portrays a Burgos Cathedral view. The name of the issuing country ‘ESPAÑA’ appears at the upper left hand side. On the right hand side the year ‘2012’ and the mintmark.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 8 million

Date of issue:

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
           Fourth Quarter 2005 and 2006

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   Fourth Quarter 2005

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.5       7.3       9.5      11.6       7.8
      For rent...........................      2.9       2.2       3.4       3.2       2.4
      For sale only......................      1.3       0.9       1.6       1.4       1.0
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.9       0.7       0.8       0.9       0.9
      Held off market....................      4.5       3.5       3.7       6.1       3.5
        For occasional use...............      1.5       0.9       0.7       2.1       1.6
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.8       0.8       1.2       0.7
        For other reasons................      2.1       1.8       2.2       2.8       1.2

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.0       3.8       2.7       2.9       3.0

    Occupied.............................     87.5      88.9      87.8      85.5      89.2



                                                   Fourth Quarter 2006


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................     10.0       7.5       9.9      12.0       8.7
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.1       3.3       3.6       2.4
      For sale only......................      1.7       1.2       1.9       1.9       1.4
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.7       0.7       0.9       0.8
      Held off market....................      4.6       3.5       4.0       5.7       4.2
        For occasional use...............      1.5       0.7       0.8       2.1       1.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.8       0.8       1.0       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.2       2.0       2.3       2.6       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.2       4.3       2.7       3.1       2.9

    Occupied.............................     86.8      88.2      87.4      84.9      88.4
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 37 1 . KATERI NA W I LLI AMS v . EUGENE W I LLI AMS.

Th e t ri al co u rt fo u n d K a t e r i n a W i l l i am s i n co n t em p t fo r fai l i n g t o p ay

t em p o rary al i m o n y an d at t o rn ey fees i n a p en d i n g d i v orce m at t er. W i ll i am s fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap peal

. W e, h owev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n. Un der t h e G e o r gi a Co n s t it u t i o n o f
1 9 8 3
, Art

. V I, Sec. VI, Par. III (6 ), th e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ap p el l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er

“ [a] l l d i v o rce an d al i m o ny cas es .” Acco rd in g l y , w e h ereb y TRANSFER th i s cas e to

t h e Su prem e Co u rt o f Geo rg ia fo r d i s p o s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/08/2015 December 08, 2015
# C_2012252EN.01000601.xml

| 22.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 August 2012

2012/C 252/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2428 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 98,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4464 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78835 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,2595 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3235 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,783 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,18 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0624 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4855 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2334 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,1839 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2250 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6404 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5286 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5536 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 404,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2627 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9015 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4660 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 794,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8713 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,547 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,5400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,086 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4964 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2143 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,8450 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2428

JPY

Japanese yen

98,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4464

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78835

SEK

Swedish krona

8,2595

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3235

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,783

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,18

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0624

RON

Romanian leu

4,4855

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2334

AUD

Australian dollar

1,1839

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2250

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6404

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5286

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5536

KRW

South Korean won

1 404,80

ZAR

South African rand

10,2627

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9015

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4660

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 794,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8713

PHP

Philippine peso

52,547

RUB

Russian rouble

39,5400

THB

Thai baht

39,086

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4964

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2143

INR

Indian rupee

68,8450

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 2, 2016

p1026 

# Order

Clerk November 2, 2016

152790

- 2

FRANCIS JOSEPH HINSBERG,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152790

- 2

COA: 324046; 324455; 325807

Genesee CC: 07

- 275950

- DM

MARIA HINSBERG,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENI ED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.