Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39675 

15See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

16See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011). 

1PT Enterprise, Unicatch, and Mid Continent 

Steel & Wire, Inc. (Mid Continent), a domestic 

producer and interested party, requested the instant 

administrative review. See PT July 31, 2017 Request 

for Administrative Review; Unicatch July 31, 2017 

Request for Administrative Review; Mid Continent 

July 31, 2017 Request for Administrative Reviews. 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 

42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the 

Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated 

January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of 

the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from 

Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated March 22, 2018 (First Prelim 

Extension). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from 

Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated July 12, 2018 (Second Prelim 

Extension). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Steel Nails from 

Taiwan; 2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

all appropriate entries covered by this 

review.15 If the preliminary results are 

unchanged for the final results, we will 

instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment rate of 82.05 percent to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR which were exported by the 

non-selected respondents eligible for a 

separate rate. If Commerce determines 

that an exporter under review had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries that entered 

under that exporter’s case number (i.e., 

at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated 

at the China-wide rate.16 Commerce 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of the final results of 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject 

merchandise exported by the companies 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will be that established 

in the final results of review (except, if 

the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero 

cash deposit will be required); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that received a separate rate 

in a prior segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for 

all Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter that 

supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: August 6, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

A. Non-Market Economy Country Status 

B. Separate Rates 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–17065 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–854] 

Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Partial 

Rescission of Administrative Review; 

2016–2017 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that Bonuts Logistics Co., LLC made 

U.S. sales of subject merchandise below 

normal value. Commerce preliminarily 

determines that Unicatch Industrial Co. 

Ltd., PT Enterprise, Inc. and its 

affiliated producer Pro-Team Coil Nail 

Enterprise, Inc. did not make U.S. sales 

of subject merchandise below normal 

value. We are rescinding the review 

with respect to 92 companies for which 

the request for review was timely 

withdrawn. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Hoefke or Chelsey Simonovich, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4947 or 

(202) 482–1979, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain steel 

nails from Taiwan. The period of review 

(POR) is July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017. 

This review covers Bonuts Logistics Co., 

LLC (Bonuts); PT Enterprise, Inc. (PT 

Enterprise) and its affiliated producer 

Pro-Team Coil Nail Enterprise, Inc. (ProTeam) (collectively, PT); and Unicatch 

Industrial Co. Ltd. (Unicatch). 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of this administrative review 1

on September 13, 2017.2 The 

preliminary results are listed below in 

the section titled ‘‘Preliminary Results 

of Review.’’ 

On January 23, 2018, Commerce 

exercised its discretion to toll all 

deadlines for the duration of the closure 

of the Federal Government from January 

20, 2018, through January 22, 2018.3 On 

March 22, 2018, we extended the 

deadline for the preliminary results to 

July 16, 2018.4 On July 12, 2018, we 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results to August 3, 2018.5

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.6


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
39676 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 

7See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of 

Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 

2015) (Order). 

8Those companies are: Air Sea Transport, Inc.; 

All Precision Co., Ltd.; Apex Maritime Co., Inc.; 

Aplus Pneumatic Corp.; Astrotech Steels Private 

Ltd.; Basso Industry Corporation; Bollore Logistics 

(Vietnam) Co. Ltd.; C.H. Robinson Freight Services; 

Challenge Industrial Co., Ltd.; Cheng Ch 

International Co. Ltd.; Chia Pao Metal Co. Ltd.; 

China International Freight Co. Ltd.; Chite 

Enterprises Co., Ltd.; Crown Run Industrial Corp.; 

Daejin Steel Company Ltd.; E&E Transport 

International Co., Ltd.; Easylink Industrial Co., Ltd.; 

ECI Taiwan Co., Ltd.; Everise Global Logistics Co., 

Ltd.; Faithful Engineering Products Co. Ltd.; 

Fastenal Asia Pacific Ltd.; Four Winds Corporation; 

Fuzhou Important Countries Import & Export; 

Fuzhou Royal Floor Co., Ltd.; Fuzhou Top Golden 

Import & Export Co.; General Merchandise 

Consolidators; Ginfa World Co. Ltd.; Gloex 

Company; H&W International Forwarders Co., Ltd.; 

Hanbit Logistics Co., Ltd.; Hecny Shipping Limited; 

Hi-Sharp Industrial Corp. Ltd.; Home Value Co., 

Ltd.; Honour Lane Logistics Co., Ltd.; Hor Liang 

Industrial Corp.; Hyup Sung Indonesia; Inmax 

Industries Sdn. Bhd.; Jade Shuttle Enterprise Co., 

Ltd.; Jia Jue Industry Co. Ltd.; Jinhai Hardware Co., 

Ltd.; Jinsco International Corp.; Joo Sung Sea & Air 

Co., Ltd.; K Win Fasteners Inc.; King Freight 

International Corporation; Korea Wire Co., Ltd.; 

Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd.; Locksure Inc.; Lu 

Kang Hand Tools Industrial Co., Ltd.; ML Global 

Ltd.; Master United Corp.; Nailermate Enterprise 

Corporation; Newrex Screw Corporation; NMC 

Logistics International Company; Noble Shipping 

Pvt. Ltd.; NS International Ltd.; OOCL Logistics 

Ltd.; Orient Express Container Co., Ltd.; Oriental 

Power Logistics Co., Ltd.; Oriental Vanguard 

Logistics Co. Ltd.; Pacific Concord International 

Ltd.; Pacific Star Express Corp.; Panda Logistics Co., 

Ltd.; Panther T&H Industry Co.; Patek Tool Co., 

Ltd.; Point Edge Corp.; President Industrial Inc.; 

Romp Coil Nail Industries Inc.; Scanwell, Schenker, 

Seamaster Logistics Sdn Bhd; Star World Product 

and Trading Co., Ltd.; Sun VN Transport Co.; T.H.I. 

Logistics Co. Ltd.; Taiwan Wakisangyo Co. Ltd.; The 

Ultimate Freight Management; Topps Wang 

International Ltd.; Trans Wagon International Co. 

Ltd.; Trans-Top Enterprise Co., Ltd.; Transwell 

Logistics Co., Ltd.; Transworld Transportation Co., 

Ltd.; Trim International Inc.; Tsi-Translink 

(Taiwan) Co. Ltd.; UC Freight Forwarding Co. Ltd.; 

U-Can-Do Hardware Corp.; Universal Power 

Shipping Ltd.; UPS Supply Chain Solutions; VIM 

International Enterprise Co., Ltd.; Wictory Co. Ltd.; 

Yeh Fong Hsin; Yehdyi Enterprise Co., Ltd.; Yu Tai 

World Co., Ltd.; and Yusen Logistics (Taiwan) Ltd. 

9See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

12See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

13See 19 CFR 351.303. 

Scope of the Order 7

The merchandise covered by this 

order is certain steel nails. The certain 

steel nails subject to the order are 

currently classifiable under HTSUS 

subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 

7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05, 

7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 

7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 

7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 

7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40, 

7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 

7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80, 

7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 

7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. 

Certain steel nails subject to these 

orders also may be classified under 

HTSUS subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 

8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS 

subheadings. 

The full description of the scope of 

the order is contained in the 

memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum 

for Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review: Certain 

Steel Nails from Taiwan; 2016–2017’’ 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

The written description of the scope of 

the order is dispositive. 

Methodology 

For PT and Unicatch, Commerce has 

conducted this review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act). Normal 

value (NV) is calculated in accordance 

with section 773 of the Act. Export price 

or constructed export price is calculated 

in accordance with section 772 of the 

Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, Room B–8024 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

A list of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as the Appendix to this notice. 

Application of Facts Available and 

Adverse Facts Available 

Pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of 

the Act, Commerce has preliminarily 

relied upon facts otherwise available 

with adverse inferences (AFA) for 

Bonuts because this respondent did not 

respond to Commerce’s antidumping 

duty questionnaire, and thus failed to 

cooperate to the best of its ability in 

responding to Commerce’s requests for 

information. For a complete explanation 

of the methodology and rationale 

underlying our preliminary application 

of AFA, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

Commerce received timely requests to 

conduct an administrative review of 

certain exporters covering the POR. On 

December 8, 2017, Mid Continent Steel 

& Wire, Inc. (Mid Continent), a domestic 

producer and interested party, timely 

withdrew its review requests for certain 

companies. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind 

an administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested the 

review withdraws its request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

review. Accordingly, we are rescinding 

this administrative review with respect 

to the companies for which all review 

requests have been withdrawn.8 For a 

full description of the methodology and 

rationale underlying our conclusions, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist: 

Producer/exporter 

Dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Bonuts Logistics Co., LLC ........ 78.13 

PT Enterprise, Inc./Pro-Team 

Coil Nail Enterprise, Inc ........ 0.00 

Unicatch Industrial Co. Ltd ....... 0.00 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

preliminary results within five days of 

the date of publication of this notice.9

Interested parties may submit cases 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.10

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than five days after the due date for 

filing case briefs.11 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.12 Case and rebuttal briefs 

should be filed using ACCESS.13 In 

order to be properly filed, ACCESS must 

successfully receive an electronically 

filed document in its entirety by 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices 39677 

14See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

15See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

16 Id. 

17 Id. 

18See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

19For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

20See Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 

FR 28959 (May 20, 2015). 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS, within 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice.14 Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 

the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs. 

Unless otherwise extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

the issues raised in any written briefs, 

not later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

this review. 

Where the respondent reported 

reliable entered values, we calculated 

importer- (or customer-) specific ad 

valorem rates by aggregating the 

dumping margins calculated for all U.S. 

sales to each importer (or customer) and 

dividing this amount by the total 

entered value of the sales to each 

importer (or customer).15 Where 

Commerce calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin by dividing the 

total amount of dumping for reviewed 

sales to that party by the total sales 

quantity associated with those 

transactions, Commerce will direct CBP 

to assess importer- (or customer-) 

specific assessment rates based on the 

resulting per-unit rates.16 Where an 

importer- (or customer-) specific ad 

valorem or per-unit rate is greater than 

de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), 

Commerce will instruct CBP to collect 

the appropriate duties at the time of 

liquidation.17 Where an importer- (or 

customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.18

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Bonuts, PT, or Unicatch, 

for which the producer did not know 

that its merchandise was destined for 

the United States, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 

all-others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.19

For the firms covered by this review, 

we intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. For the non-reviewed firms for 

which we are rescinding this 

administrative review, Commerce 

intends to instruct CBP 15 days after 

publication of these preliminary results 

of review to assess antidumping duties 

at rates equal to the rates of cash 

deposits for estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption, during the period May 20, 

2016, through June 30, 2017, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Bonuts, PT, 

and Unicatch will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for other 

manufacturers and exporters covered in 

a prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which that manufacturer 

or exporter participated; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the manufacturer of subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 2.24 

percent, the all-others rate in the LTFV 

investigation.20 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notifications 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: August 3, 2018. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

5. Duty Absorption 

6. Use of Facts Available With an Adverse 

Inference 

7. Comparisons to Normal Value 

8. Date of Sale 

9. Export Price and Constructed Export 

Price 

10. Normal Value 

11. Currency Conversion 

12. Verification 

13. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–17163 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–825] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From India: 

Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES