alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011365EN.01000101.xml

| 15.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6407 — Apache/Mobil North Sea)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 365/01

On 8 December 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6407. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6407. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 32.2.1**

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated EdisonCompany of New York, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

 

Dated: February 21, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE DECEMBER 12, 1997 
THREE-FOR-TWO STOCK SPLIT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,537
<PP&E>                                          80,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           263
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,744
<SALES>                                         70,269
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,975
<CGS>                                           54,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,457
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
| (1)   | The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended February 6, 2010 (the “Form 10-K/A”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |   |   |                                                                 |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/Renato Cataldo                    |   |   | /s/Dale Heins                                                        |   |
| Renato Cataldo                       |   |   | Dale Heins                                                           |   |
| President andChief Executive Officer |   |   | Senior Vice President, Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          44,316
<SECURITIES>                                    55,986
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,357
<PP&E>                                          20,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,827)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,280
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,818
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   494
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,756)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.46)
        

</TABLE>
#### Gloria AZAR, Appellant, v. Charles Theodore AZAR, Appellee.

No. 71-896.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 7, 1972.

Cushman & Cushman, Miami; for appellant.

Manners & Amoon, and Harold L. Men-delow, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the plaintiff from a divorce judgment. The pleadings raised substantial issues relating to property rights of the parties in certain businesses and other assets. The trial court struck the pleadings of the plaintiff wife and entered a default against her, for her disobedience of an order relating to discovery. However, notwithstanding the default, the court permitted the wife to participate on final hearing with relation to the properties. The judgment granted the defendant husband a divorce on his counterclaim, and ruled on the property rights of the parties. Thereby the wife was allowed to retain the property which was solely owned by her. The residence of the parties was ordered to be listed by them for sale, with the proceeds of the sale to be divided between them. The wife was given the furnishings thereof. The husband was declared to be the owner of the corporations Sevilla International, Inc. and G.M.C.A. Corporation, except that as to a certain note of the latter corporation, secured by a chattel mortgage, which had been made to and was possessed by the wife, it was held the husband should have an equal interest with her therein. A diamond ring deposited by the parties with a jeweler for sale was declared to be the property of the husband. Another diamond ring, of 7.8 carats was declared to be the property of the husband “and or his mother.” The wife was declared to be the owner of "any interest in M.B.G. Investments Corp.” and any saving accounts in her name. The parties’ joint savings and checking accounts were held to be joint.

*267The first contention presented by the appellant is that the court committed error in striking her pleadings and entering the default. The trial court was empowered to so order, in the circumstances, under Rule 1.380(b) FRCP, 30 F.S.A.

Entry of the default and denial of plaintiffs’ motion to set it aside was not error, by virtue of the provisions of the rule cited above, and for the further reason that the plaintiff, at trial, was permitted to be heard and to litigate her property claims, and to oppose those of the defendants.

The further contention of the appellant that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment is found to be without merit upon consideration thereof on the basis of the record and briefs.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment is affirmed.

BARKDULL, C. J., concurs in judgment.
# C_2012082EN.01000701.xml

| 21.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 March 2012

2012/C 82/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3198 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4353 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83220 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9120 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2059 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6060 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,464 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 289,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6966 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1270 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3788 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4000 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2586 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3098 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2480 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6160 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6672 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 486,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0581 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3395 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5335 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 083,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0678 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,768 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,6432 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,637 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4112 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7681 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,5940 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3198

JPY

Japanese yen

110,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4353

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83220

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9120

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2059

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6060

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,464

HUF

Hungarian forint

289,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6966

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1270

RON

Romanian leu

4,3788

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4000

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2586

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3098

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2480

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6160

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6672

KRW

South Korean won

1 486,75

ZAR

South African rand

10,0581

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3395

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5335

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 083,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0678

PHP

Philippine peso

56,768

RUB

Russian rouble

38,6432

THB

Thai baht

40,637

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4112

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7681

INR

Indian rupee

66,5940

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Virginia Cox SMITH, Appellant, v. Farrell M. SMITH, Appellee.

No. 66-546.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 28, 1967.

Leonard Edward Abel, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Hendricks & Hendricks, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL, and BARKDULL, JJ.

BARKDULL, Judge.

The parties to this cause were divorced in the State of Georgia. As a part of the final decree, there was an agreement incorporated providing for child support and other matters.

The appellant brought the instant action in the Circuit Court of Dade County, seeking to establish the Georgia decree to recover arrearages thereunder and sought a modification by increasing the amount of support payments. Following a final hearing, the chancellor established the decree, refused to award a judgment for arrearages, and required the appellee to make periodic support payments in accordance with the terms of the original decree. The appellant appeals and seeks reversal because of the failure of the chancellor to award a judgment for the arrearages and to entertain, during the course of the proceedings, a motion to increase the amount of support. We affirm.

In determining whether arrear-ages should be awarded under a proceeding to enforce a foreign decree, the chancellor was entitled to consider equitable defenses, such as a subsequent modification between the parties. See: Sackler v. Sackler, Fla.1950, 47 So.2d 292, 18 A.L.R.2d 856; Haas v. Haas, Fla.1952, 59 So.2d 640; Kramer v. Kramer, Fla.App.1962, 146 So.2d 586. No *17error is found in the chancellor’s refusing to entertain the motion to modify by increasing the amount of support during the pendency of the case, because at the time it was presented the foreign decree had not been established in this State. Of course, this would not prevent the appellant from seeking modification [pursuant to the provisions of § 65.15 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.] of the decree as ultimately rendered by the chancellor, provided the appellant justifies the need for change. See: Terry v. Terry, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 890; Simon v. Simon, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 849; Smith v. Smith, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 351; § 65.15 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; 10 Fla.Jur., Divorce, etc., § 198 et seq.

Therefore, the decree is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
ACCEPTED 01-15-01089-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/29/2015 10:23:21 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
# C_2012196EN.01000201.xml

| 4.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6477 — BP/Chevron/ENI/Sonangol/Total/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 196/03

On 16 May 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6477. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6477. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT (23.0)



                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CPI Corp.:


     We consent to incorporation by reference in the
registration statements Nos. 33-50082 and 002-86403 on Forms S-8
of CPI Corp. of our report dated April 6, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of CPI Corp. and subsidiaries as of
February 5, 2000 and February 6, 1999 and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the
three-year period ended February 5, 2000, and the related
schedule, which report appears in the 1999 annual report on Form
10-K of CPI Corp.






/s/ KPMG LLP
-------------------------
    KPMG LLP



St. Louis, Missouri
April 6, 2000
# C_2012286EN.01002101.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/21

---

Special Report No 12/2012 ‘Did the Commission and Eurostat improve the process for producing reliable and credible European statistics?’

2012/C 286/13

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 12/2012 ‘Did the Commission and Eurostat improve the process for producing reliable and credible European statistics?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Anthony D.Wedo, as Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of NewWorld Resaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2003,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| August 15,  2003 | /s/ ANTHONY  D. WEDO                                            |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|             | Anthony D. Wedo

Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer          |
|             | (Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

----
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**SECTION      906 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the                information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                of The                Amacore Group, Inc. |

|   | /s/                *James                L.                Koenig                           *James                L. KoenigActing                Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 I, Stefan
A. Bird, President of Salton Sea Funding Corporation (the “Company”), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date: May
6, 2005
 
 
 /s/
Stefan A. Bird
 Stefan A.
Bird
 President
 (chief
executive officer)