alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012052EN.01000201.xml

| 22.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 February 2012

2012/C 52/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3222 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 105,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4358 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8107 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2073 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,912 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 288,03 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6977 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1837 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3565 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3182 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2385 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3172 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2547 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5839 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6613 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 488,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2166 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3258 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5820 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 888,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9997 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,421 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,4500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,671 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2670 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8286 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,2240 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3222

JPY

Japanese yen

105,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4358

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83640

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8107

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2073

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,912

HUF

Hungarian forint

288,03

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6977

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1837

RON

Romanian leu

4,3565

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3182

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2385

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3172

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2547

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5839

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6613

KRW

South Korean won

1 488,88

ZAR

South African rand

10,2166

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3258

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5820

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 888,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9997

PHP

Philippine peso

56,421

RUB

Russian rouble

39,4500

THB

Thai baht

40,671

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2670

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8286

INR

Indian rupee

65,2240

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
No. 11610.

#### Schultz, Guardian, *v.*Huber, Executor, et al.

Decided February 23, 1910.

*573Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Bates & Meyer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Coppock & Coppock,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew and Price, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF REGISTRANT**

 

Registrant has no parent; see proxy statement for Registrant’sprincipal shareholders.  The followingare Registrant’s subsidiaries included in the consolidated financialstatements:

 
| **Name of Subsidiary  (Each Owned 100% by Registrant  Except as Otherwise Stated)** | ** ** | **State or Other  Jurisdiction  of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------|
|                                                                                |       |                                               |       |
| Castle Concrete Company                                                             |       | Colorado                                           |       |
| Continental  Catalina, Inc.*                                                   |       | Arizona                                            |       |
| Continental  Copper, Inc.                                                      |       | Arizona                                            |       |
| Edens Industrial  Park, Inc.                                                   |       | Illinois                                           |       |
| McKinney Door and  Hardware, Inc.                                              |       | Colorado                                           |       |
| Phoenix  Manufacturing, Inc.                                                   |       | Arizona                                            |       |
| Rocky Mountain Ready Mix  Concrete, Inc.                                       |       | Colorado                                           |       |
| Transit Mix Concrete Co.                                                            |       | Colorado                                           |       |
| Transit Mix of  Pueblo, Inc.                                                   |       | Colorado                                           |       |
| Williams Furnace Co.                                                                |       | Delaware                                           |       |

----

     * owned by Continental Copper, Inc.

 

----
# C_2011353EN.01000501.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 353/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 353/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6394 — Gilde/Eismann)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 353/04

On 28 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6394. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6394. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
262 La. 970

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Evariste V. WASHINGTON v Alwynn J. CRONVICH, Sheriff of Jefferson Parish.

No. 52748.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 14, 1972.

In re: Evariste V. Washington applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. *Furman*is still pending in the U. S. Supreme Court. The matter is not final. Under the circumstances the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
Exhibit 10.92

AMENDMENT TWO        TO        Countrywide Financial Corporation  Selected Employee Deferred Compensation Plan

WHEREAS, Countrywide Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), wishes to amend the Selected
Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") in accordance with Section 3.02 of IRS Notice 2006-79, 2006-43 I.R.B. 763 (Oct. 4, 2006), to permit certain Plan
participants to elect, by September 30, 2007, to receive a lump sum payment on or about January 2, 2008 with respect to all or a portion of their vested Plan account balances that are
attributable to amounts credited to their Plan accounts after December 31, 2004.

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective August 16, 2007, in accordance with Section 13.2 of the Plan in the following
manner:

<Signature
page to follow>

---



WHEREFORE,the Company has caused this Amendment Two to be signed by it duly authorized officer this 16th day of August 2007.

|        |  |                    |                                                         |  | COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|------- |  | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|        |  |                    |                                                         |  | By:                              
|        |  |                    |                                                         |  |                                  
|        |  |                    |                                                         |  |                                  
|Attest: |  |                    |                                                         |  |                                  
|By:     |  | /s/ Leora I. Goren |                                                         |  |                                  
|        |  | Name:              | Leora I. Goren                                          |  |                                  
|        |  | Title:             | Senior Managing Director,
Chief Human Resources Officer |  |                                  

2

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

 

Registrant has no parent; see proxy statement for Registrant’s principal shareholders.  The following are Registrant’s subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements:

 
| **Name of Subsidiary   (Each Owned 100% by Registrant   Except as Otherwise Stated)** | ** ** | **State or Other   Jurisdiction   of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
|                                                                                                                               |       |                                                                |       |
| Castle Concrete Company                                                                                                            |       | Colorado                                                            |       |
| Continental Catalina, Inc.*                                                                                                   |       | Arizona                                                             |       |
| Continental Copper, Inc.                                                                                                      |       | Arizona                                                             |       |
| Edens Industrial Park, Inc.                                                                                                   |       | Illinois                                                            |       |
| McKinney Door and Hardware, Inc.                                                                                              |       | Colorado                                                            |       |
| Phoenix Manufacturing, Inc.                                                                                                   |       | Arizona                                                             |       |
| Transit Mix Concrete Co.                                                                                                           |       | Colorado                                                            |       |
| Transit Mix of Pueblo, Inc.                                                                                                   |       | Colorado                                                            |       |
| Williams Furnace Co.                                                                                                               |       | Delaware                                                            |       |

 

----

* owned by Continental Copper, Inc.

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMADOR LUEVANOS

- GARCIA, AKA Guillermo Garcia Espinosa,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 72944

Agency No. A090

- 344

- 153

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Immigration Judge’s Decision

Submitted March 13, 2018 **

Before: LEAVY , M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Amador Luevanos

- Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a)

that he did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in Mexico, and thus

is not entitled to relief from his reinstated removal order. We ha ve jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 72944

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evide nce the IJ’s factual

findings, Andrade

- Garcia v. Lynch , 828 F.3d 829, 83 3 (9th Cir. 2016), and w e

deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Luevanos

- Garcia

failed to establish a reasonable possibility of f uture persecution in Mexico on

account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir.

2010) (“An [applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by criminals mot ivated

by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected

ground.”).

Substantial evidence also supports the conclusion that Luevanos

- Garcia

failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or

acquiesce nce of the government of Mexico. See Andrade

- Garcia , 828 F.3d at 836

-

37.

We reject Luevanos

- Garcia’ s contention that the IJ failed to consider all of

his claims and evidence.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
CCM and the 2020 Censu

Program

Burton Reist, U.S. Census Burea
Key Observations Relevant To The 

Program

1. The Differential Undercount Continues2. Renters Show a Higher Net Undercount3. Overall Increase in Duplication4. Data From Respondents Who Returned Their F

More Accurate than Data from Non-Response Fup Operations

2
2020 Research Addressing The

Observations

• Optimizing Self-Response

– Leverage new technologies/multiple modes t

more opportunities to respond

– Increase Language Support– Explore Social Networks

3
2020 Research Addressing The

Observations

• Questionnaire Content, Design and Mode 

– Explore optimal designs and modes for Limited E

Proficiency Populations

– Explore methods for ensuring consistent content 

modes and translations 

– Explore the modification and improvement of resi

rules

– Conduct research focusing on over- and under-co

questions, and interviewing approaches by mode

4
2020 Research Addressing The

Observations

• Reducing/Improving Person Follow-up

– Reducing the time for data collection in the fie– Tailoring follow-up operations and contact str

by geography/demographics

5
2020 Research Addressing The

Observations

• Matching Process Improvement

– Research and assess matching techniques to 

optimal methods for address and person matand unduplication

– Identify data needed to improve the quality of 

matching

– Research and evaluate new software and 

technologies 

6
2020 Research – Next Steps

7
Additional Observations

• Update/Leave (U/L)

– Interesting mystery around the extent of duplication o

U/L areas.

– Possibly partially due to seasonal 2nd homes where p

erroneously enumerated, while being correctly enumtheir 1st homes (more likely to be in Mailout/Mailback 

– Need further analysis to understand the extent to wh

duplication is due to person duplication at multiple reperson duplication caused by the same housing unit the address list more than once. 

– We need to explore the extent to which these duplica

geographically clustered.

8
Additional Observations

• Update/Enumerate (U/E)

– Higher rates of all records requiring imputatio

than in Mailout/Mailback areas (2.0%)

– Is this due to more seasonal addresses? Mor

difficulty finding someone home?

9
Additional Observations

• Housing Unit (HU) Coverage

– Main net results show and undercount of HUs of 

Not significantly different from Census 2000 resu

– Continue to show a much higher undercount of v

housing units. We continue to be challenged by tdistinction between vacant housing units and “nohousing unit”.

– Need to look at differences by Type of Enumerati

(TEA). Higher error in U/E areas (both overcountundercounting) and higher duplication in U/L. 

10
Thank you

Contact information:

burton.h.reist@census.gov

11
CONNIE MACK 

IdTH DiSlfiiCT, FiriilDA 

BUDGET COMMinEE 

FOReiGN AFFAIRS 

COMMITTEE 

TRANSPORTATION AND 

INFRASTRUCTURE COMMinEE 

Congress of tfje VAnitta State s 

mammoii B«U 20515-0014 

September 7,2010 

CAPECORftl OH ICC: 

804 NiCHOi AS PARKWA Y EAST 

Suii f 1 

CAPtCdXALjf L 33990 

<2.39t673-t83? 

NAPaS OFFICE. 

3aOT TA^nM/iaM i TFWrL 

NAPiFS,FL311I i 

WASHiriQTOfl OFFICE: 

115 CAN^oN HOUS E OFFICE BUILDI^:C 

WAeHinciTok, OC 20&li i 

(203) 22b-2E3G 

tinp^/matk. house.gov 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood; CO 

I am writing to offer my support for the application being submitted by the City of 

Naples Municipal Airport for funding under the U.S. Department of Transportation's 

Small Community Air Service Development Program. 

The City of Naples Municipal Airport is the only fully certified Part 139 airport in 

Collier County ready to offer scheduled airline service. This program will enable the City 

of Naples Municipal Airport to pui'chase equipment for their commercial terminal and 

develop a strong mai'keting campaign and business model, which will assist them in reestablishing and maintaining a reliable air service program. 

Funding through the Small Community Air Service Development Program will 

provide the City of Naples Municipal Airport with the necessary tools to enhance the 

quality of aiiport services for its passengers and for the citizens of Southwest Florida. 

I commend the City of Naples Municipal Airport for their commitment to this 

important goal and urge the U.S. Department of Transportation to support their 

application. 

Sincerely, 

Connie Mack 

Member of Congress 

fP.lHTeD oil BEtYtllO PAPtfl
Exhibit 12

                         Continental Global Group, Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                        (In thousands, except for ratios)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Years ended December 31
                                               2004         2003            2002             2001           2000
                                           ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>         <C>              <C>              <C>           <C>

Computation of Earnings:
Income (loss) before income taxes and
   accounting change                          $  7,127    $ (12,629)       $ (8,689)        $ (8,413)     $ (11,200)
Add:
   Interest expense (1)                          6,909       15,280          15,408           15,787         15,826
   Portion of rent expense
     representative of an interest
     factor                                        921          845             677              703            691
                                           ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Earnings                                      $ 14,957    $   3,496        $  7,396         $  8,077      $   5,317
                                           ==============================================================================

Computation of Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense                            $ 6,909     $ 15,280        $ 15,408         $ 15,787       $ 15,826
   Portion of rent expense
     representative of an interest
     factor                                        921          845             677              703            691
                                           ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges                                  $ 7,830     $ 16,125        $ 16,085         $ 16,490      $  16,517
                                           ==============================================================================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                1.91            - (2)           - (3)            - (4)          - (5)
                                           ==============================================================================
</TABLE>

(1)  Amortization of deferred financing costs of $520 is included in interest
     expense.

(2)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges in the year ended December
     31, 2003 by $12,629.

(3)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges in the year ended December
     31, 2002 by $8,689.

(4)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges in the year ended December
     31, 2001 by $8,413.

(5)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges in the year ended December
     31, 2000 by $11,200.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.121 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, MARCH 23, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to New York http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  https://www.census.gov/rdo http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html Please visit http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/ for an interactive map showcasing county-level population change from 1960 to 2010, as well as state-level data on race and Hispanic or Latino origin for 2010. The widget will be updated as states are released and can be embedded on your website. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Gilbert HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1055.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 17, 1972.

James L. Graham, Titusville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs and record we find no error and, therefore, affirm the judgment below.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.