alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012212EN.01000201.xml

| 19.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 July 2012

2012/C 212/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2234 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 96,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4388 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78400 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,4927 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4825 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,278 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 285,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1795 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5653 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2131 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,1867 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2399 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4893 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5397 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5416 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 398,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0063 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7937 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4810 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 587,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8702 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,021 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6991 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,794 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4756 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1445 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,8280 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2234

JPY

Japanese yen

96,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4388

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78400

SEK

Swedish krona

8,4927

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4825

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,278

HUF

Hungarian forint

285,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1795

RON

Romanian leu

4,5653

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2131

AUD

Australian dollar

1,1867

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2399

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4893

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5397

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5416

KRW

South Korean won

1 398,54

ZAR

South African rand

10,0063

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7937

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4810

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 587,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8702

PHP

Philippine peso

51,021

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6991

THB

Thai baht

38,794

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4756

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1445

INR

Indian rupee

67,8280

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012037EN.01002001.xml

| 10.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/20

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 February 2012

2012/C 37/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3288 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 102,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4320 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83665 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8045 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2103 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6300 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,985 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 290,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6989 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1971 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3535 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3331 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2295 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3219 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3056 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5896 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6548 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 483,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0959 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3717 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5857 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 855,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0004 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,132 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,5546 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,861 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2882 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8765 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,5830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3288

JPY

Japanese yen

102,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4320

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83665

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8045

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2103

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6300

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,985

HUF

Hungarian forint

290,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6989

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1971

RON

Romanian leu

4,3535

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3331

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2295

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3219

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3056

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5896

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6548

KRW

South Korean won

1 483,80

ZAR

South African rand

10,0959

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3717

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5857

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 855,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0004

PHP

Philippine peso

56,132

RUB

Russian rouble

39,5546

THB

Thai baht

40,861

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2882

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8765

INR

Indian rupee

65,5830

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50729 Summary Calendar

RICKY NEALS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ELTON D. BROCK, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-96-CV-006

- - - - - - - - - - March 24, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The motion of Ricky Neals, Texas prisoner #639448, to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. Because Neals’ current balance in his prison account is $0.00, we assess no initial partial filing fee against Neals. However, Neals henceforth shall make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The agency having custody of Neals is directed to forward payments from his prisoner account to the clerk of theNo. 96-50729 - 2 - district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the appellate filing fee of $105 is paid. Id. Concerning Neals’ contentions that prison officials failed to protect him from his cellmates and that the officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, we have reviewed Neals’ brief and the record, and we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Neals’ civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Neals’ appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Neals is cautioned that future frivolous civil suits and appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Neals is further cautioned to review any pending suits and appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 15 , 2016

NO. 03

- 15

- 00768

- CV

Carolyn Barnes, Appellant

v.

Austin American Statesman; Austin Legal Blog; Zach Ryall; and KXAN

- TV, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment and orders signed by the district court on November 4,

2015. Having reviewed the record

, it appears to the Court that appellant has not prosecuted her

appeal by failing to file a brief th at complied with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.143 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3691
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 2010 2010 Census: Delaware Approaches Its 2000 Mail Participation Rate A number of counties and cities across the country have already matched or exceeded their Census 2000 rates (see: http://2010.census.gov/news/xls/match_surpassed_4-16.xlsLink to a non-federal Web site [Excel] for the full list). "If you mail back your 2010 Census today you can ensure that your household is counted," U.S. Census Bureau Director Robert Groves said. Households that normally pick up their mail from a post office box are already slated for in-person follow-up from census workers. The rates for all states, counties, places, towns and townships are updated each afternoon through April 23 at 4:00 p.m. on the Take 10 Challenge Map (http://2010.census.gov/2010census/take10map/). A final rate will be announced May 3. ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are used to apportion congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to tribal, state and local governments each year and to make decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census form is one of the shortest in U.S. history, consisting of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict confidentiality laws protect the respondents and the information they provide.
 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office/troubleshoot/excel/get-latest-excel-viewer
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2011363EN.01001801.xml

| 13.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/18

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 December 2011

2011/C 363/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3251 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84800 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0525 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2349 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7015 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,578 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,16 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6979 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5395 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3491 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4687 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3104 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3576 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3109 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7293 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7193 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 523,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9105 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4284 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4975 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 987,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1946 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,842 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,8289 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,277 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4068 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2660 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,0470 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3251

JPY

Japanese yen

103,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84800

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0525

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2349

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7015

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,578

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,16

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6979

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5395

RON

Romanian leu

4,3491

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4687

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3104

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3576

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3109

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7293

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7193

KRW

South Korean won

1 523,48

ZAR

South African rand

10,9105

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4284

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4975

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 987,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1946

PHP

Philippine peso

57,842

RUB

Russian rouble

41,8289

THB

Thai baht

41,277

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4068

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2660

INR

Indian rupee

70,0470

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                       358
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,723
<PP&E>                                          86,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,139
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,862
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,748
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,066)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                       250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
        

</TABLE>
# C_2013061EN.01000201.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,75 % on 1 March 2013

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 March 2013

2013/C 61/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3000 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4562 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86470 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3660 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2245 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4855 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,677 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7006 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1477 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3640 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3457 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2741 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3437 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0829 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5759 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6120 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 415,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,8092 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0908 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5912 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 601,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0262 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,867 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,727 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5825 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7042 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,3880 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3000

JPY

Japanese yen

120,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4562

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86470

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3660

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2245

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4855

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,677

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7006

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1477

RON

Romanian leu

4,3640

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3457

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2741

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3437

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0829

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5759

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6120

KRW

South Korean won

1 415,56

ZAR

South African rand

11,8092

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0908

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5912

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 601,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0262

PHP

Philippine peso

52,867

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9750

THB

Thai baht

38,727

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5825

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7042

INR

Indian rupee

71,3880

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned Directors of PHOENIX FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC. do hereby constitute
and appoint James R. Riedman and Kenneth E. Wolf their true and lawful attorneys and agents, to execute the Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 and any
further amendments to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for us and in our names as Directors, to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection
therewith.



|                                         |  |                      
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                                         | 
|/S/    FREDRICK
PORT Fredrick Port       |  | Dated: April 11, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    STEVEN
DEPERRIOR Steven DePerrior |  | Dated: April 11, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    GREGORY
HARDEN Gregory Harden     |  | Dated: April 11, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    JAMES R.
RIEDMAN James R. Riedman |  | Dated: April 11, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    WILHELM
PFANDER Wilhelm Pfander   |  | Dated: April 11, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    JOHN
KRATZER John Kratzer         |  | Dated: April 11, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    ROBERT
GUNST Robert Gunst         |  | Dated: April 11, 2007
|                                         | 
|/S/    JOHN
ROBBINS John Robbins         |  | Dated: April 11, 2007
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00133-CR

Theodore Koeppel, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. B-07-1013-S, HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury found appellant Theodore Koeppel guilty of the aggravated sexual assault of

a child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2008). The district court assessed

punishment at forty years’ imprisonment.

The five-year-old complainant testified that appellant penetrated her vagina with his

finger. The sexual assault nurse examiner who examined the complainant following her outcry

testified that she observed trauma to the complainant’s genitals that was consistent with digital

penetration. Appellant testified and denied the accusation. 

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record,

including an exhaustive summary of the evidence, demonstrating why there are no arguable appellate
2

issues to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State,

485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate

record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

___________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: March 18, 2009

Do Not Publish
No. 11736.

#### Berman *v.*The State of Ohio.

Decided October 26, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Walter C. Ong*and *Mr. D. M. Bader,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John A. Cline,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. P. L. A. Leighley,*assistant prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Siiauck and Price JJ., concur.
#### Patricia DELIA, Appellant, v. Dorothy STAUDT and Jerry Staudt, her husband, Appellees.

No. 69-428.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2013012EN.01000901.xml

| 16.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/9

---

Corrigendum to the calls for proposals under the work programme for 2012 of the Information and Communication Technologies Policy Support Programme as part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 396 of 21 December 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 396 of 21 December 2012

2013/C 12/05

In the title of the calls for proposals, in the table of contents and on page 20:

for:

‘Calls for proposals under the work programme for 2012 ...’,

read:

‘Calls for proposals under the work programme for 2013 ...’;

on page 20:

for:

‘...launch of the call for proposals under the work programme for 2012 ...’,

read:

‘...launch of the call for proposals under the work programme for 2013 ...’.

---
#### Frank CLARK III, Appellant, v. Stephanie M. CLARK, Appellee.

No. 73-55.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 23, 1973.

Larry Klein, of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson & McKeown, West Palm Beach, and Frank Clark, III, Cocoa, for appellant.

John M. Cain, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN, J., concur.

CROSS, J., dissents, with opinion.

CROSS, Judge

(dissenting):

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. On appeal ap*626pellant-husband contends abuse of discretion on the part of the chancellor in awarding alimony and attorney’s fees to the appellee-wife. In granting alimony and attorney’s fees two elements must exist to justify such an award: necessity of the wife and ability of the husband to pay. In the case sub judice, the record on appeal clearly demonstrates that the wife is financially independent and quite able not only to care for herself but to compensate her counsel for his services.

Accordingly, I would reverse and remand to the trial court to enter judgment denying alimony and attorney’s fees.