alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,114
<INVENTORY>                                      2,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,349
<PP&E>                                         477,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 457,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,729
<BONDS>                                        172,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,054
<COMMON>                                         8,732
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   457,841
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,385
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (114)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,073
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,822
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
        

</TABLE>
258 La. 248

#### Grace SURRIDGE and Russell T. Surridge v. Philip BENANTI, Jr. and Security Insurance Company.

No. 51239.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 29, 1971.

In re: Grace Surridge and Russell T. Surridge applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 243 So.2d 354.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 2732

_____________________________
P AUL B URNS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

T HE S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

July 10, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on the merits.

O STERHAUS , C.J., and M.K. T HOMAS and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Paul Burns, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 21, 2013

NO. 03-13-00293-CV

T. W. and C. N., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s 

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the order of the trial court is 

in all things affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that appellants have filed affidavits

of inability to pay costs, it is FURTHER ordered that no costs of appeal are assessed against 

appellants; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of The First
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, DeeDee Lowery, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      DeeDee LoweryName:
                      DeeDee
      LoweryTitle:
                      Executive
      Vice President and ChiefFinancial
      OfficerDate:
                      May
      20,
2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to The First Bancshares, Inc., and will be
retained by The First Bancshares, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11809.

#### Seal *v.*Goebel, Executor, et al.

Decided November 23, 1909.

Error to Circúit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Willard B. Stier*and *Mr. John C. Hermann,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. B. Shroder; Messrs. Worthington & Strong*and *Mr. Edwards Ritche,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2011346EN.01000501.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 November 2011

2011/C 346/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3229 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 102,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4372 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85585 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2505 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2253 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,031 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,32 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6978 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5143 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3653 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4946 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3664 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3912 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3145 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7907 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7363 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 541,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3565 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4307 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4924 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 994,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2296 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,289 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,8960 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,552 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5127 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,8841 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,1080 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3229

JPY

Japanese yen

102,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4372

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85585

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2505

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2253

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,031

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,32

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6978

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5143

RON

Romanian leu

4,3653

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4946

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3664

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3912

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3145

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7907

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7363

KRW

South Korean won

1 541,34

ZAR

South African rand

11,3565

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4307

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4924

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 994,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2296

PHP

Philippine peso

58,289

RUB

Russian rouble

41,8960

THB

Thai baht

41,552

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5127

MXN

Mexican peso

18,8841

INR

Indian rupee

69,1080

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 11

                               WORLD AIRWAYS, INC.
                      CALCULATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE



                                     For the Three Months Ended March 31, 1999
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                       Loss           Shares         Per-Share
                                    (Numerator)    (Denominator)      Amount
                                  --------------    ------------    ------------
Basic EPS
    Net loss                      $   (2,706,000)     7,000,064     $     (0.39)
                                                                     ===========

Effect of Dilutive Securities
    Options                                   --             --
    8% convertible debentures                 --             --
                                       ----------      --------

Diluted EPS
    Net  loss                     $   (2,706,000)     7,000,064   $       (0.39)
                                      ===========     =========    =============



                                     For the Three Months Ended March 31, 1998
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                        Loss          Shares         Per-Share
                                    (Numerator)    (Denominator)       Amount
                                  ---------------   -----------   --------------
Basic EPS
    Net loss                      $   (2,987,000)     7,419,000   $       (0.40)
                                                                   =============

Effect of Dilutive Securities
    Options                                    --            --
    8% convertible debentures                  --            --
                                      -----------     ---------

Diluted EPS
    Net loss                      $   (2,987,000)     7,419,000    $      (0.40)
                                      ===========     =========     ============
#### Mamie DAVIS, and her husband Reverend Sam Davis, Appellants, v. S & H HOTEL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 72-545.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 5, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1973.

Ser & Keyfetz, and Edward P.. Busch, Miami, for appellants.

Adams, George & Wood and Thomas J. Schulte, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for ap-pellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Trusell, Fla.1961, 131 So.2d 730. See also Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Patty, Fla. 1959, 109 So.2d 5; Bay Machine and Boat Works, Inc. v. Ray-Brooks Machinery Company, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 270.
# C_2011311EN.01000301.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/3

---

Composition of the Chambers and attachment of the Judges to Chambers

2011/C 311/03

By decision of 30 November 2005, (1) the Tribunal decided to sit in three Chambers and as a full Court. By decision of 10 October 2011, for the period from 7 October 2011 to 30 September 2014, the Tribunal elected as Presidents of the Chambers Judges H. KREPPEL and M. I. ROFES I PUJOL and attached the Judges to the Chambers as follows:

1

First Chamber

First Chamber

| | H. KREPPEL, President of Chamber, |
| --- | --- |

H. KREPPEL, President of Chamber,

| | E. PERILLO and R. BARENTS, Judges, |
| --- | --- |

E. PERILLO and R. BARENTS, Judges,

Second Chamber

Second Chamber

| | M. I. ROFES I PUJOL, President of Chamber, |
| --- | --- |

M. I. ROFES I PUJOL, President of Chamber,

| | I. BORUTA and K. BRADLEY, Judges, |
| --- | --- |

I. BORUTA and K. BRADLEY, Judges,

Third Chamber, sitting with three Judges

Third Chamber, sitting with three Judges

| | S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH, President of the Tribunal, |
| --- | --- |

S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH, President of the Tribunal,

| | I. BORUTA, E. PERILLO, R. BARENTS and K. BRADLEY, Judges. |
| --- | --- |

I. BORUTA, E. PERILLO, R. BARENTS and K. BRADLEY, Judges.

| | In the Third Chamber, the President will sit, alternately, either with Judges I. BORUTA and E. PERILLO or with Judges R. BARENTS and K. BRADLEY, subject always to connections between cases. |
| --- | --- |

In the Third Chamber, the President will sit, alternately, either with Judges I. BORUTA and E. PERILLO or with Judges R. BARENTS and K. BRADLEY, subject always to connections between cases.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 C 322, p. 16.

1

---
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  1965 to 2006
               (in percent)
   Year       First    Second     Third     Fourth
             Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter

2006....        68.5      68.7      69.0
2005....        69.1      68.6      68.8      69.0
2004....        68.6      69.2      69.0      69.2
2003....        68.0      68.0      68.4      68.6
2002\r....      67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2002....        67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2001....        67.5      67.7      68.1      68.0
2000....        67.1      67.2      67.7      67.5

1999....        66.7      66.6      67.0      66.9
1998....        65.9      66.0      66.8      66.4
1997....        65.4      65.7      66.0      65.7
1996....        65.1      65.4      65.6      65.4
1995....        64.2      64.7      65.0      65.1
1994....        63.8      63.8      64.1      64.2
1993\r....      63.7      63.9      64.2      64.2
1993....        64.2      64.4      64.7      64.6
1992....        64.0      63.9      64.3      64.4
1991....        63.9      63.9      64.2      64.2
1990....        64.0      63.7      64.0      64.1
1989\r....      63.9      63.8      64.1      63.8

1989....        63.9      63.9      64.0      63.8
1988....        63.7      63.7      64.0      63.8
1987....        63.8      63.8      64.2      64.1
1986....        63.6      63.8      63.8      63.9
1985....        64.1      64.1      63.9      63.5
1984....        64.6      64.6      64.6      64.1
1983....        64.7      64.7      64.8      64.4
1982....        64.8      64.9      64.9      64.5
1981....        65.6      65.3      65.6      65.2
1980....        65.5      65.5      65.8      65.5
1979\r....      64.8      64.9      65.8      65.4

1979....        65.3      65.1      66.0      65.8
1978....        64.8      64.4      65.2      65.4
1977....        64.8      64.5      65.0      64.9
1976....        64.6      64.6      64.9      64.8
1975....        64.4      64.9      64.6      64.5
1974....        64.8      64.8      64.6      64.4
1973....        64.9      64.4      64.4      64.4
1972....        64.3      64.5      64.3      64.4
1971....        64.0      64.1      64.4      64.5
1970....        64.3      64.0      64.4      64.0
1969....        64.1      64.4      64.4      64.4
1968....        63.6      64.1      64.1      63.6
1967....        63.3      63.9      63.8      63.5
1966....        63.5      63.2      63.3      63.8
1965....        62.9      62.9      62.9      63.4
\r Revised.
##### 



(Dollars in thousands)
    

2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    37,501
    
    
    $
    39,695
    
    
    $
    29,597
    
    
    $
    22,825
    
    
    $
    27,009Capitalized interest
    
    
    136
    
    
    
    173
    
    
    
    241
    
    
    
    455
    
    
    
    864Amortization of debt expense
    
    
    964
    
    
    
    3,952
    
    
    
    1,118
    
    
    
    1,114
    
    
    
    857Dividend requirement on Series BPreferred Stock (1)
    
    
    9,114
    
    
    
    9,797
    
    
    
    10,072
    
    
    
    10,331
    
    
    
    10,606Interest
component of rental expense (2)
    
    
    7,733
    
    
    
    6,590
    
    
    
    8,976
    
    
    
    8,974
    
    
    
    12,675Fixed Charges
    
    $
    55,448
    
    
    $
    60,207
    
    
    $
    50,004
    
    
    $
    43,699
    
    
    $
    52,011Earnings (Loss):Income from
continuing operations before taxes (3)
    
    $
    351,121
    
    
    $
    246,823
    
    
    $
    197,517
    
    
    $
    152,328
    
    
    $
    85,007(Income) Loss from equity-method investment
    
    
    (16,061
    )
    
    
    (18,253
    )
    
    
    (20,718
    )
    
    
    (18,188
    )
    
    
    9,415335,060
    
    
    
    228,570
    
    
    
    176,799
    
    
    
    134,140
    
    
    
    94,422Fixed charges
    
    
    55,448
    
    
    
    60,207
    
    
    
    50,004
    
    
    
    43,699
    
    
    
    52,011Capitalized interest
    
    
    (136
    )
    
    
    (173
    )
    
    
    (241
    )
    
    
    (455
    )
    
    
    (864
    )Preferred dividend requirements (4)
    
    
    (9,114
    )
    
    
    (9,797
    )
    
    
    (10,072
    )
    
    
    (10,331
    )
    
    
    (10,606
    )$
    381,258
    
    
    $
    278,807
    
    
    $
    216,490
    
    
    $
    167,053
    
    
    $
    134,963Ratio
    
    
    6.9
    x
    
    
    4.6
    x
    
    
    4.3
    x
    
    
    3.8
    x
    
    
    2.6
    x
 
 (1)
    
    Dividends on shares of the Series B cumulative convertible preferred stock are used to pay debt
service on notes issued by the CNFs Thrift and Stock Plan.(2)
    
    Estimate of the interest portion of lease payments.(3)
    
    For the year ended December 31, 2001, Menlo Worldwide Logistics results included a $47.5
million loss from the business failure of a customer.(4)
    
    Preferred stock dividend requirements included in Fixed Charges but not deducted in
the determination of Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes.
## NUMBER 13 - 22 - 00 376 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN R E BERRY CONTRACTING, LP D/B/A BAY LTD. AND JUAN HERNANDEZ

On Petition for Writ o f Mandamus

.


## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras 1
R elators Berry Contracting, LP d/b/a Bay Ltd. and Juan Hernandez filed a petition for writ of mandamus seek ing to set aside a July 28, 2022 order concluding that relators “ha ve failed to prove the affirmative defense of exclusive remedy” in a case concerning

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so . When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case

. ” ); id. R. 47.1 ( “ The court of appeals must hand down a written opinion that is as brief as practicable but that addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal. ” ); id. R. 47.4 ( explaining the differences between opinions and memorandum opinion s).2 workers’ compensation. See T EX

. L AB

. C ODE A NN . § 408.001(a). B y previous order, this Court ordered the trial court proceedings to be stayed and requested that the real parties in interest, Gernal Mann and Jennifer Mann, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.2, 52.4, 52.8, 52.10( b). Subsequently, this Court abated th e petition for writ of mandamus because the parties ha d entered into settlement discussions . The parties have now filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss Mandamus Proceeding and to Lift Stay.” According to this motion, the pa rties have resolved the matters in the underlying case , thereby “rendering moot any further proceedings in this Court.” The parties thus request that we lift the stay previously imposed in this case and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. The Court, having examined and fully considered the joint motion , is of the opinion that it should be granted. S ee In re Contract Freighters, Inc. , 646 S.W.3d 810, 813 (Tex. 2022) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Heckman v. Williamson C ou nty , 369 S.W.3d 137,
1 62 (Tex. 2012); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. , 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding)

. Accordingly, we grant the “Joint Motion to Dismiss Mandamus Proceeding and to Lift Stay.” We reinstate this case. We lift the stay previously imposed in t his original proceeding, and we dismiss this petition f or writ of mandamus as moot. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8, 52.10(b). DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice Delivered and filed on the 27th day of October , 202 2

.
CORNING NATURAL GAS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the years ended September 20, 1999 and 1998

Utility Operations                            1999               1998
Operating revenue:
 Residential, commercial and industrial    $12,668,536         13,311,539
 Transportation                              3,479,189          3,201,884
 Capacity assignment                           128,445            159,872
                                            ----------         ----------
    Total operating revenue                 16,276,170         16,673,295
                                            ----------         ----------
Operating expenses and taxes:
 Natural gas purchased                       9,459,613          9,409,388
 Operating and maintenance                   3,593,462          3,557,025
 Taxes other than federal income taxes       1,570,206          1,650,950
 Depreciation                                  488,631            574,372
 Federal income taxes                           42,835            162,792
                                            ----------         ----------
     Total operating expenses and taxes     15,154,747         15,354,527
                                            ----------         ----------
     Operating income from utility
       operations                            1,121,423          1,318,768
                                            ----------         ----------
Unregulated Operations

Unregulated revenue                          6,746,804          2,664,462

Unregulated expenses                         6,528,527          2,415,797
                                             ---------         ----------
     Operating income from unregulated Ops     218,277            248,665
                                            ----------         ----------
Other income(incl net realized gains on
 marketable securities of $25,375 in 1999
 and $31,592 in 1998)                           63,353             31,885
                                            ----------         -----------
     Income before interest expense          1,403,053          1,599,318

Interest expense-regulated                     965,105            959,161
                                             ---------          ---------
     Net income                             $  437,948            640,157
                                           ===========          =========
Weighted average number of shares outstanding-
  basic and diluted                            460,000            460,000
Basic and diluted earnings per common share $     0.95               1.39
                                           ===========           =========

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.