alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John C. GRAVES, II, Appellant, v. Robert WIGGINS, Appellee.

No. 71-325.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 25, 1972.

Blackwell, Walker & Gray, and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellant.

Morgan, Carratt & O’Connor, Ft. Lau-derdale, Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Sher-ouse & Virgin, Miami, for appellee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict. The cause was submitted to the jury under the law of comparative negligence which the parties agreed was applicable because the action was for a maritime tort. The verdict was for the plaintiff-appellant and against the defendant-appellee in the amount of $15,000, and for the defendant-counterclaimant against the plaintiff-coun-terdefendant for $5,000. The appeal is from the $5,000 judgment entered against the plaintiff-appellant as counterdefendant. No issue is raised as to the way in which the cause was tried or to the form of the verdict.

The point presented challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to the negligence of the appellant. Most importantly, it is urged that the facts presented to the jury did not show a legal duty on the appellant to warn the appellee of a dangerous condition. In the alternative it is urged that the facts failed to show appellant’s knowledge of the dangerous condition and that negligence, if any, of appellant was a proximate cause of appellee’s injury.

Our examination of the record convinces us that the application of the rule that upon appeal the appellee is entitled to have the record viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict and that the appellee is entitled to all reasonable inferences from the evidence requires affirmance upon the issue as to appellant’s knowledge of the dangerous condition and the issue as to appellant’s negligence being a proximate cause of appellee’s injury. Land v. Patroni, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 94; Krasny v. Richter, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 612.

In addition we find that the evidence is susceptible to the view that the appellant and the appellee were engaged in a joint undertaking for their own pleasure and *269that appellant as a participant was aware of the danger involved and appellee was not, nevertheless, appellant proceeded with action which was a contributing cause to appellee’s injury. Cf. Judy v. Belk, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 694; Cashell v. Hart, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 559.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         220
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  77,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                   16,082
<INVENTORY>                                    11,695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               77,677
<PP&E>                                         6,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                 561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,463
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,891
<COMMON>                                       83
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,574)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,638
<SALES>                                        55,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               71,437
<CGS>                                          55,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  33,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               55
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               13,561
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24,246)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (24,246)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,621)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25,867)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (3.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (3.59)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                          EXHIBIT 21

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Registrant has no parent; see proxy statement for Registrant's principal 
shareholders. The following are Registrant's subsidiaries which are included 
in the consolidated financial statements:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

           Name of Subsidiary                         State or Other
      (Each Owned 100% by Registrant                   Jurisdiction
        Except as Otherwise Stated)                   of Incorporation
     --------------------------------                ------------------
      <S>                                                <C>
      Castle Concrete Company                            Colorado
      Continental Catalina, Inc.*                        Arizona
      Continental Copper, Inc.                           Arizona
      Continental Quicksilver, Inc.                      Idaho
      Continental Uranium, Inc.                          Colorado
      Edens Industrial Park, Inc.                        Illinois
      Phoenix Manufacturing, Inc.                        Arizona
      ProSoft International, Inc.**                      Colorado
      Transit Mix Concrete Co.                           Colorado
      Transit Mix of Pueblo, Inc.                        Colorado
      Williams Furnace Co.                               Delaware

</TABLE>


*owned by Continental Copper, Inc.

**owned by Transit Mix Concrete Co.
Exhibit 10.43.2
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 23, 1999, amends 
Section 6.1(f) of the Employment Agreement, dated as of February 25, 1997, 
between Northeast Utilities Service Company and Hugh C. MacKenzie 
("Executive"), to read as follows:

(f)  "Termination upon a Change of Control" shall mean a Termination of 
Employment during the period beginning on the earlier of (a) approval by the 
shareholders of NU of a Change of Control or (b) consummation of a Change of 
Control and, in either case, ending on the second anniversary of the 
consummation of the transaction that constitutes the Change of Control (or if 
such period started on shareholder approval and after such shareholder 
approval the Board abandons the transaction, on the date the Board abandoned 
the transaction) either:

(i)  initiated by the Company for any reason other than Executive's (w) 
disability, as described in Section 5.1 hereof, (x) death, (y) retirement on 
or after attaining age 65, or (z) "cause," as defined in Section 5.3 hereof, 
or 

(ii) initiated by Executive (A) upon any failure of the Company materially to 
comply with and satisfy any of the terms of this Agreement, including any 
significant reduction by the Company of the authority, duties or 
responsibilities of Executive, any reduction of Executive's compensation or 
benefits due hereunder, or the assignment to Executive of duties which are 
materially inconsistent with the duties of Executive's position as defined in 
Section 1.2 above, or (B) if Executive is transferred, without Executive's 
written consent, to a location that is more than 50 miles from Executive's 
principal place of business immediately preceding such approval or 
consummation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, intending to be legally bound, have 
executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


/s/Hugh C. MacKenzie			NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY
Executive						/s/Cheryl Grise
3/5/99						Senior Vice President, Secretary
							and General Counsel
							3/4/99
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CN.33 **Contact:**  Malkia McLeod
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2010 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Rolls Out New Interactive Google Maps Showing 2010 Census Participation Rates Communities Able to Track Percentage of Households Mailing Back Forms The Census Bureau encourages everyone to “Take 10” — that is to take 10 minutes to answer the 10 questions on the census form. The mail participation rate for the nation in 2000 was 72 percent.  For every 1 percent increase in the national participation rate by mail, the Census Bureau can save taxpayers $85 million by not having to send census takers door to door to households that failed to return the census form. If every household mailed back its 2010 Census form, the cost of taking the census would be reduced by $1.5 billion. The “Take 10” map, which includes the 2000 Census mail participation rates as a benchmark for which communities are encouraged to exceed, will also feature an easy-to-embed local rate tracker (widget) that local community officials, businesses and media can add to their Web sites to encourage residents to participate in the census. Download the **“Take 10” Rate Tracker** to embed on your Web site and the toolkit with templates and suggestions for implementing the “Take 10” challenge locally. Check out your community's 2010 Census mail participation rate and compare it to 2000 at http://2010.census.gov/2010census/take10map/.
    
  Members of the media may also participate by telephone. (Please dial-in early to allow time for the operator to place you in the call.) Dial-in number: 1-800-619-4415
  Passcode:  2010 CENSUS
  http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/operational-press-briefing/march-24-2010.html
  www.visualwebcaster.com/2010-census
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 OF
TEL-SAVE  HOLDINGS,  INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                          166,102,000
<SECURITIES>                                    162,075,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    47,452,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3,064,000
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                327,491,000
<PP&E>                                           58,023,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2,674,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  606,817,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            38,405,000
<BONDS>                                         300,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            658,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      267,754,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    268,412,000
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                226,506,000
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   224,298,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     469,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                        183,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 286,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        286,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.00
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


_________________________________________________________________________________________


I, John F. Woods, certify that:





|   |                                                                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Citizens Financial Group, Inc.;




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.




Date: March 1, 2018





/s/ John F. WoodsJohn F. WoodsChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
LSP-WHITEWATER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,553
<PP&E>                                           8,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                     851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,482
<BONDS>                                        177,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,419
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,591
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,662
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 20, 2017

s0913

Order 

Clerk

September 20, 2017

155995

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155995

COA: 329448

Wayne CC: 15-001020-FC

CLIFFORD DANIEL THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 27, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Dr. Z. L. WEATHERFORD v. Arlin BROWN and Mary Nell Brown.

No. 50677.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 27, 1978.

Sam M. Reedy, Fulton, for appellant.

Jimmy E. McElroy, Fulton, for appellees.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Itawamba County; James E. Bost, Chancellor.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., SUGG and BOWLING, JJ., and EDWARD C. PRI-SOCK, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Robert Benou, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Conolog
            Corporation.

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
            untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
            fact necessary to make the statement make, in light to the
            circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
            with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
            information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
            material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
            cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
            in this annual report.

Date: November 12, 2003


                                           /s/ Robert Benou
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert Benou, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.11


 


	Corporate Headquarters 	 




Intel Corporation 


2200 Mission College Blvd 


Santa Clara, CA, 95054-1549


 


June 1, 2022


 


Dear Amnon,


 


I am very excited about the opportunity that lies ahead
for Mobileye and Intel. As we discussed, upon completion of Mobileye’s IPO, you will become the CEO of the new public company (Mobileye),
reporting to me. Below outlines the parameters of how I am thinking about your going forward compensation.


 


Typical compensation for a public company CEO includes both
cash and annual equity grants, where annual equity grants represent a substantial portion of the arrangement. Our intention is to follow
a similar model for your compensation. Based on our review of the external benchmarks of comparable companies, we determined that $15,000,000
in target total compensation is a very strong compensation arrangement for you and consistent with other CEOs for comparable companies.


 


In addition to the annual target compensation, we think
it is important to give you the opportunity to reinvest in Mobileye. If you invest in Mobileye with your own capital up to $10,000,000,
we are prepared to match it 3:1 through a Mobileye equity grant that will vest 50% in year four and 50% in year five.


 


Below is a summary of the components of your compensation
that we’ve discussed with you:


 


		§	Target
                                            Total Compensation: $15,000,000






 


–
Annual base salary: $800,000 


–
Annual equity grant: $14,200,000


 





		§	Matching
                                            equity grant: 3:1 matching on your Mobileye investment up to $10,000,000






 


–
The specific terms of the buy-in will need to be established


 






    Page 1 of 2


     


    

 


We will continue to prepare the specific
terms of your compensation in the coming weeks, but this letter outlines the key components of your going forward compensation, which
is subject to the completion of the IPO. Our expectation is that any governance-related items would comply with typical market practice
and that future compensation actions will be determined by the Mobileye Board or its designated compensation committee.


 


Please reach out to Christy or me with any questions or
concerns here.


 


Sincerely,


 


	/s/ Pat Gelsinger	 




Pat Gelsinger 


Chief Executive Officer


 


Accepted and Agreed


  


	/s/ Amnon Shashua	 




Amnon Shashua


 


	DATE:	June 3, 2022	 




 






    Page 2 of 2