alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cleve JONES v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50744.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 26, 1978.

A. Vincent Blackwell, Pascagoula, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### McArthur Wilson, Appellant, v Laung Hang Realty Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[721 NYS2d 290]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated April 5, 2000, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Laung Hang Realty Corp. which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that “an out-of-possession owner or lessor is not liable for injuries that occur on the premises unless the owner or lessor has retained control over the premises or is contractually obligated to repair unsafe conditions” *(Berado v City of Mount Vernon,*262 AD2d 513, 514; *accord, Stark v Port Auth.,*224 AD2d 681). The defendant Laung Hang Realty Corp. (hereinafter Laung Hang), the owner of the premises where the plaintiff allegedly fell, made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment. The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact that Laung Hang either retained control of that portion of the property where the plaintiff fell, or was contractually obligated to keep the property in good repair. Accordingly, Laung Hang was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
# C_2011365EN.01000201.xml

| 15.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6225 — Molaris/Commerz Real/RWE/Amprion)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 365/03

On 23 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6225. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6225. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0414

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANDREW JAMES McCURDY, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 11, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 4 2023

08/04/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0414
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Manufacturing    >Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories, & Orders    >Historical Data
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQS	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQS	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories, & Orders - Historical Data
  Latest Monthly Full Report on Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories, and Orders
  PDF and Excel files of Tables 1 through 8 from the most recent Full Report
  Historical M3 Press Releases
  Historical Advance Report on Durable Goods Press Releases
 Historical Full Report on Total Manufacturing Press Releases
  Historical Time Series and M3 Survey Revision Information
  Excel Time Series Files and Revision Information
 Last Revised: June 09, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000759641
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-A LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         137,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,141
<PP&E>                                       5,126,348
<DEPRECIATION>                               (896,171)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,367,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,265,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,367,318
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               523,846
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                317,664
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            317,664
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   317,664
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    44.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    44.29
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012034EN.01002701.xml

| 8.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/27

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 February 2012

2012/C 34/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3113 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4336 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83020 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8215 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2087 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6225 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,000 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 291,66 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6990 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1783 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3523 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3076 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2161 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3088 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1682 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5747 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6370 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 467,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9577 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2763 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5750 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 791,87 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9509 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,715 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,2870 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,611 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2636 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6601 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,7060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3113

JPY

Japanese yen

100,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4336

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83020

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8215

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2087

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6225

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,000

HUF

Hungarian forint

291,66

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6990

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1783

RON

Romanian leu

4,3523

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3076

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2161

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3088

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1682

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5747

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6370

KRW

South Korean won

1 467,38

ZAR

South African rand

9,9577

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2763

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5750

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 791,87

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9509

PHP

Philippine peso

55,715

RUB

Russian rouble

39,2870

THB

Thai baht

40,611

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2636

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6601

INR

Indian rupee

64,7060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                             IRREVOCABLE STOCK POWER

      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, WORLD AIR HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware
corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Assignor"), has fully and
irrevocably granted, assigned and transferred and hereby does fully and
irrevocably grant, assign and transfer to_______________________and the
successors, transferees, assigns and personal representatives thereof
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Assignee") the following property:

                  100% of the shares of common stock of NORTH AMERICAN
                  AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation, represented by
                  certificate number 10.


      Assignor hereby irrevocably appoints Assignee to be Assignor's true and
lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and empowers Assignee,
for and in the name and stead of Assignor, to sell, transfer, hypothecate,
liquidate or otherwise dispose of all of or any portion of the above-described
securities, from time to time, and, for that purpose, to make, sign, execute and
deliver any documents or perform any other act necessary for such sale,
transfer, hypothecation, liquidation or other disposition. Assignor acknowledges
that this appointment is coupled with an interest and shall not be revocable by
Assignor's dissolution or any other reason. Assignor hereby ratifies and
approves all acts that Assignee or any substitute therefor shall do by virtue
hereof.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and sealed this power as
of this_______day of April 2005.

                                            WORLD AIR HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware
                                            corporation

                                            BY: /s/
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name:___________________________
                                                Title:__________________________

WITNESSED:

By: /s/
    ------------------------------
    Name:_________________________
    Title:________________________

North American Airlines, Inc.
Irrevocable Stock Power
# C_2011336EN.01000201.xml

| 17.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6391 — Dow/Mitsui/Brazilian Polyethylene JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 336/03

On 27 October 2001, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6391. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6391. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases2010 Census

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB07-DR.08**
**Contact:**  Briana KayaPublic Information Office(301) 763-3030 (phone)(301) 763-3762 (fax)(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, APRIL 12, 2007

## Media Advisory — U.S. Census Bureau Kicks Off 2008 Dress Rehearsal 

### Commerce Under Secretary to Attend Stockton Event

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### Eddie FAIRFAX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 66-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 7, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1967.

Eddie Fairfax, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant below from a judgment of conviction of larceny ■of an automobile, rendered by the criminal ■court of record in Dade County on a non-jury trial.

The contentions presented on appeal have been considered in the light of the record and the briefs and are found to be without merit. The evidence furnishes adequate support for the adjudication of .guilt. The admission into evidence of statements made by the defendant to police officers, in the circumstances disclosed in the record, did not constitute error. See McCullers v. State, Fla.App. 1962, 143 So. 2d 909, 913.

Affirmed.
#### DIMUN INVESTMENT, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Eleanor LIPPMAN, as successor Administratrix to the Estate of Jeffrey Lippman, a deceased minor, and Eleanor Lippman, individually, Appellee.

No. 71-185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 14, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 8 -00 133 -CR

The odo r e K oe ppe l , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY , 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. B -07 -10 13- S , HO NORAB LE THO MAS J. GO SSETT , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N A j ury found appellant Theodore Koeppe l g uilty of the a g g rava

ted sexual assault of a child. See Tex. P enal Code A nn. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2008). The district co u rt assessed punis hme nt at f

or ty y e ars ’ i mpr iso nme nt. Th e fi ve -y e ar- old c omp la ina nt te sti fi e d that a

pp e lla nt p e ne tr a te d h e r v a g ina

wi th h is fing er. T h e s e xu a l a s s a

u lt nu r s e e xa mi n e r

w h o e xa mi n e d

th e c o mp la in an t f

o ll o w in g h e r

o u tc ry testified that she obser

ved tra uma to the complainant ’s g enitals that was c onsistent with digital penetr ation. Appellant testified a nd denied the a ccusation. A p p e l l an t ’ s c o u rt
- a

p p o i n t e d a t t o r

n e y h a s f i l e d a m o t i o n t o w i t h dr aw s u p p o rt e d b y a brief c oncluding that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. The br ief mee ts the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif

or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by prese nting a

profe ssional evaluation of the rec ord, i n c l u d i n g an e xha us tiv e summa

ry of the e vid e nc e , d e mon str a tin g why the re are no argua

ble a pp e llate2

issues to be advanc ed. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W .2d 807 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 5 16 S.W. 2d

68 4 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 74 ); J ac k so n v . S tate , 48 5 S. W.2 d 5 53 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Ap pe lla nt r e c e ive d a

c op y of c ouns e l’ s b ri e f a

nd wa s a dv ise d of his ri g ht to e xami ne the a pp e llate
rec ord and to file a

pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. We have r eviewe d the re cord a nd counsel’s b r ie f

and ag ree that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the rec ord that mig ht arguably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: Mar ch 18, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Randall J. Fagundo, the Chief Executive Officer of
American Coin Merchandising, Inc. (the Company), and Kenneth W. Edic, the
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that:



|1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the Periodic Report), to which this Certification is
attached as Exhibit 32, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the
Company.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 14, 2003

By: /s/ RANDALL J. FAGUNDO
    
    By: /s/ KENNETH W. EDICRandall J. Fagundo
    
    Kenneth W. EdicChief Executive Officer
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

29
Exhibit 32

| | Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Beach First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
               with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/  Walter E. Standish, III
| |  | ----------------------------
| |  | Walter E. Standish, III     
| |  | Chief Executive Officer     
| |  | August 12, 2003             

| |  | /s/  Richard N. Burch  
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | Richard N. Burch       
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | August 12, 2003
#### King DAVID, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-254.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 27, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 21, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00293

- CV

T. W. and C. N., Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUN TY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the tr ial court’s

order : IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the order of the trial court is

in all things affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that appellant s ha ve filed affidavit s

of inability to pay costs, it is FURTHER ordered that no costs of appeal are assessed against

appellant s ; and that this decision be certified below for observance.