alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012042EN.01000101.xml

| 15.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 February 2012

2012/C 42/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3169 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 102,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4333 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83765 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7814 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2075 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5350 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,097 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 291,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6988 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1910 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3488 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3307 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2298 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3162 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2107 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5822 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6650 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 481,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1800 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2900 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5821 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 856,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0073 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,260 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,5780 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,613 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2633 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7766 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,0610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3169

JPY

Japanese yen

102,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4333

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83765

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7814

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2075

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5350

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,097

HUF

Hungarian forint

291,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6988

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1910

RON

Romanian leu

4,3488

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3307

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2298

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3162

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2107

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5822

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6650

KRW

South Korean won

1 481,62

ZAR

South African rand

10,1800

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2900

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5821

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 856,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0073

PHP

Philippine peso

56,260

RUB

Russian rouble

39,5780

THB

Thai baht

40,613

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2633

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7766

INR

Indian rupee

65,0610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012116EN.01000201.xml

| 20.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 April 2012

2012/C 116/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3086 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4389 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81710 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8416 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2021 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5485 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,842 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 297,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6985 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1870 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3750 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3444 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2652 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2971 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1560 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6031 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6382 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 491,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2507 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2492 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5080 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 014,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0115 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,857 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,6575 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,449 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4693 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2750 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,2370 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3086

JPY

Japanese yen

106,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4389

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81710

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8416

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2021

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5485

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,842

HUF

Hungarian forint

297,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6985

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1870

RON

Romanian leu

4,3750

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3444

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2652

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2971

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1560

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6031

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6382

KRW

South Korean won

1 491,07

ZAR

South African rand

10,2507

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2492

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5080

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 014,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0115

PHP

Philippine peso

55,857

RUB

Russian rouble

38,6575

THB

Thai baht

40,449

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4693

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2750

INR

Indian rupee

68,2370

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Richard P. Dutkiewicz, as Chief FinancialOfficer and Principal Accounting Officer of New World Restaurant Group, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 29,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Dated: May 6, 2005 | By: /s/ RICHARD P. DUTKIEWICZ |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|               | Richard P. Dutkiewicz         |
|               | Chief Financial Officer       |
|               | Principal Accounting Officer  |

 

----
#### Arnold NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-717.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 5, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION

We, Ronald W. Kaplan, President and Chief Executive Officer, and J. L.
Dickinson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Continental Global
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.          The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
            annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully
            complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
            in all material respects, the financial condition and
            results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald W. Kaplan                        /s/ J. L. Dickinson
-------------------------------------       ----------------------------------
Ronald W. Kaplan, President and Chief       J. L. Dickinson, Vice President and
   Executive Officer                           Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  March 31, 2006


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by Continental Global Group, Inc. for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that Continental Global Group, Inc. specifically
incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT      32.0

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 4, 2006 (the“Form                10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of                the                Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Paul Rasmusssen     |   | /s/                Gary W. Douglass              |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Paul                Rasmussen          |   | Gary                W. Douglass                  |
| Chief                Executive Officer |   | Executive                Vice President, Finance |
|                                   |   | and                Chief Financial Officer       |
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-138-CR

MICHAEL BLAKE BOURNE	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On April 1, 2009, the trial court entered judgment on the jury’s verdict after the jury found Appellant Michael Blake Bourne guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and assessed twenty-eight years’ confinement as punishment.  Bourne did not file a motion for new trial; therefore, his notice of appeal was due May 1, 2009.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b), 26.2(a)(1). 

	On June 4, 2009, we notified Bourne’s appellate counsel of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because Bourne’s notice of appeal was not filed in the trial court until May 4, 2009.2  We informed him that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless he filed a response on or before June 15, 2009, advising us whether the mailbox rule would apply in this case.  See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b).  Bourne’s appellate counsel’s reply, dated June 8, 2009, and received by the court on June 9, 2009, fails to provide this court with a basis to exercise jurisdiction.

	A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 of the rules of appellate procedure is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction over an appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).  The court of criminal appeals has expressly held that without a timely filed notice of appeal or motion for extension of time, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal.  See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (“When a notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period [in rule 26.3] but no timely motion for extension of time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction.”).  Here, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction.  See id. at 523.  Therefore, we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.3  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1), 43.2(f).

							PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MEIER, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 2, 2009
#### Joseph DIMITRI and Frank Dimitri v. Hugh C. SNELL, John C. Snell and H. Charles Snell, d/b/a John-Charles Restaurant.

No. 62413.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Joseph Dimitri and Frank Dimitri applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ denied.
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: Re: Clarification regarding Rice et al. 2011 paper

From: Daniel N Weber <dweber@uwm.edu>

To: Meredith Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/19/2012 05:02 PM

Subject: Re: Clarification regarding your paper Rice et al. 2011

Dr. Lassiter;

Thank you for including our paper in your chapter. You did not miss anything. Exposure 

concentrations were nominal based on serial dilutions from the stock solution. We were 

unable to accurately measure media concentrations. For the purposes of the 

experiment, embryo concentrations were more critical so those were measured using 

100 embryos per sample to ensure a significant concentration could be measured. If 

you have any other questions, please feel free to ask.

Daniel N. Weber, Ph.D.

Senior Scientist

Neurobehavioral Toxicology Facility

Children's Environmental Health Sciences Center

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

600 E. Greenfield Ave.

Milwaukee, WI 53204

Dr. Weber:

I am contacting you in regards to your 2011 paper entitled; "Developmental lead exposure causes startle 

response deficits in zebrafish" published in Aquatic Toxicology (Aquatic Toxicology 105:600-608). I may 

have missed this in reading the study but did you quantify the Pb in the exposure medium (10nM and 

30nM concentrations)? I see that ICP-MS was used to check the Pb-free medium but I did not see a 

specific statement regarding the quantification of the exposure concentrations . In the statistical analyses 

section it does state that ICP-MS analyses were subjected to a one-way ANOVA. We are including your 

study in the EPA Integrated Science Assessment for Pb (Chapter 7, Ecological Effects of Pb) and prefer 

to report measured concentrations when they are available, especially since effects were observed at 

very low concentrations.

Meredith Gooding Lassiter, Ph.D.

Ecologist 

National Center for Environmental Assessment

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

lassiter.meredith@epa.gov
Exhibit 32

         Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The  undersigned, Bernhard Steiner and David W. Whitwell, in their capacities as
Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Clean  Diesel
Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") do each hereby certify with respect to the
Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31,
2006,  as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof
(the  "Report"),  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
          1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and results of operations of Registrant as of, and for, the
          periods presented in this Report.


                    /S/  BERNHARD  STEINER
                    ----------------------------------------
                    BERNHARD  STEINER
                    PRESIDENT,  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER AND DIRECTOR
                    MAY  11,  2006

                    /S/  DAVID  W.  WHITWELL
                    ----------------------------------------
                    DAVID  W.  WHITWELL
                    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER
                    MAY  11,  2006


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act") this
certification accompanies the Report and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Act, be deemed filed by Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.
and will be retained by Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

 

Registrant has no parent; see proxy statement for Registrant’sprincipal shareholders.  The followingare Registrant’s subsidiaries included in the consolidated financialstatements:

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**                  | ** ** | **State or  Other**   | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------|------------|
| **(Each Owned 100% by Registrant**      | ** ** | **Jurisdiction**      | ** ** |
| **Except as Otherwise Stated)**         | ** ** | **of  Incorporation** | ** ** |
|                                    |       |                  |       |
| Castle Concrete Company                 | ** ** | ** **            | Colorado   | ** ** |
| Continental Catalina, Inc.*             | ** ** | ** **            | Arizona    | ** ** |
| Continental Copper, Inc.                | ** ** | ** **            | Arizona    | ** ** |
| Edens Industrial Park, Inc.             | ** ** | ** **            | Illinois   | ** ** |
| McKinney Door and Hardware, Inc.**      | ** ** | ** **            | Colorado   | ** ** |
| Phoenix Manufacturing, Inc.             | ** ** | ** **            | Arizona    | ** ** |
| Rocky Mountain Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. | ** ** | ** **            | Colorado   | ** ** |
| Transit Mix Concrete Co.                | ** ** | ** **            | Colorado   | ** ** |
| Transit Mix of Pueblo, Inc.             | ** ** | ** **            | Colorado   | ** ** |
| Williams Furnace Co.                    | ** ** | ** **            | Delaware   | ** ** |

 

----

* owned by Continental Copper, Inc.

 

**owned by Transit Mix Concrete Co.

 

----
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Fourth Quarter 1998 and 1997

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     Fourth quarter 1998
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.9        8.3       11.4
      For rent............................       2.5        2.6        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.1        1.0        1.2
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.8        0.7
      Held off market.....................       4.6        3.8        7.4
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        3.0
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.9
        For other reasons.................       2.2        1.9        3.5

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.6        1.5        6.8

    Occupied..............................      88.5       90.3       81.8



                                                     Fourth quarter 1997
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.7        8.2       10.7
      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.0        0.9        1.4
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.7        0.7        0.6
      Held off market.....................       4.4        3.8        6.6
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        2.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.7        0.7        0.7
        For other reasons.................       2.2        1.9        3.1

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.8        1.6        7.1

    Occupied..............................      88.6       90.3       82.2
Exhibit 32.1



COMSYS IT PARTNERS, INC. AND AFFILIATES



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the
Form 10-Q) for the three months ended July 3, 2005 of COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. (the Issuer).



In connection with the Form 10-Q, the undersigned, Michael T. Willis, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Issuer,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of his knowledge:



(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and



(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer as of the dates and for the periods indicated in the Form 10-Q.



Dated: August 17, 2005.



By:

/s/ Michael T. WillisName:

Michael T. WillisTitle:

Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. and will be retained by COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.