alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header History
 You are here: Census.gov ›
  History ›
  Programs › Demographic Skip top of page navigation
 History Main
      Agency History
        Director Biographies
          Census Facilities
          Suitland, MD
          Notable Alumni
      Innovations
        Data Collection
          Technology
      Programs
        Agriculture
          Demographic
          Housing
          Economic
          Geography
          Governments
      Through the Decades
        Fast Facts
          Overview
          Index of Questions
          Questionnaires
          Census Instructions
      Genealogy
        Decennial Census Records
          Other Resources
      Reference
        Data@Museums
          Artifacts
          Lesson Plans
          Legislation
          Maps
          Oral Histories
          Privacy & Confidentiality
          Apportionment
          Publications
 Home Page Archive
        2024
          2023
          2022
          2021
          2020
          2019
          2018
          2017
          2016
          2015
          2014    
      FAQs
        Genealogy
          Agency History
          Demographic
          Economic
          Governments
          Agriculture
          Geography
          Innovations
          Miscellaneous
  In this Section: Decennial Census
  American Community Survey
  Current Population Survey
  Survey of Income and Program Participation
 Demographic Enumeration at Laundry in 1960Collecting census data at a Chinese-ownedlaundry during the 1960 census. Over the decades, the reach of the census spread to new states and areas under U.S. sovereignty or jurisdiction.  Census officials, even when they led temporary offices, have constantly sought to increase both the amount and the diversity of information they collected about the people of the United States. From mortality to home ownership, statistics have given Americans a better idea of the demographic profile of the United States.  Click on the link below for more information on the decennial census: The Decennial Census of Population and Housing The development and implementation of statistical sampling techniques for the 1940 census gave birth to several mid-decade demographic surveys at the U.S. Census Bureau.  These surveys give businesses, policy planners, and the public the opportunity to use updated national and state- or local-level (depending on sample size) statistics for relatively little cost or difficulty.  Some of these surveys include: The American Community SurveyThe Current Population SurveyThe Survey of Income and Program Participation The American Housing Survey
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S  AUDITED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DEC 31, 1998 AND AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF OPERATIONS FOR [YEAR] THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       37336 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              9023541 
<ALLOWANCES>                                291868 
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          14451319 
<PP&E>                                    11017914 
<DEPRECIATION>                              330878 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            25138355 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      5641371 
<BONDS>                                   12235708 
<COMMON>                                   8000000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (913824)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              25138355 
<SALES>                                  113163078 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         113163078 
<CGS>                                     89908460 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            110957761 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (1118224)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            184672 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2286422 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             857132 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 75710 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         781422 
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                781422 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04 
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011353EN.01000402.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 353/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 353/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6383 — Cargill/KoroFrance)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 353/03

On 16 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6383. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6383. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of income (loss) on pages
F-2 through F-5 of the  Company's  annual report on Form 10-KSB and is qualified
in it's entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3,120
<SECURITIES>                                     828 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,899
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,022
<PP&E>                                         3,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                   598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            566
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        5
<COMMON>                                       3,900  
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12,203
<SALES>                                          571
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,033
<CGS>                                            969
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,336     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (184)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (11)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,227)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.19)
        


</TABLE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors

Corning Natural Gas Corporation

Corning, New York

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Corning Natural Gas Corporation, ("the Company") as of September 30, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity,and cash flows for the year then ended.  These financial statements are theresponsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to expressan opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.  Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement.  An audit also includes assessing the accountingprinciples used and significant estimates made by management, as well asevaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believethat our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of theCompany at September 30, 2000, and the results of their operations andtheir cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accountingprinciples generally accepted in the United States of America.

/S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Rochester, New York

November 17, 2000
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50859 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALFREDO DELGADILLO-ALEMAN, also known as Alfredo Delgidillo, also known as Tomas Aleman, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-545-ALL

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Alfredo Delgadillo-Aleman appeals the 41-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Delgadillo-Aleman complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his priorNo. 01-50859 -2- removal following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause. Alternatively, Delgadillo-Aleman contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Delgadillo-Aleman acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issues for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). DelgadilloAleman’s arguments are foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### JOHN DURHAM *vs.*DAVID GREENLY, surviving executor of JOHN EVANS, deceased.

A bond will be presumed paid after twenty years, unless there be' some acknowledgment or other circumstance to rebut such presumption.

Debt on bond. Pleas, non est factum; payment ad diem ; payment post diem; plene administravit, and performance.

The bond was dated 20th April 1807, for #400 00, conditioned to pay #200 on or before the 1st of April 1811. The plaintiff resided in the State of Indiana since 1807. In February 1819, his agent here called on Evans, who admitted that there were unsettled claims or transactions between him and Durham. The conversation was about this bond. Evans died in the same year.

The only question was on the presumption of payment arising from lapse of time, as to which, the *Court*by

*Ridgely,*for plaintiff.

*Brinckloe,*for defendant.

Black, *Justice,*

charged the jury:

That if the holder of a bond allows it to stand for twenty years, without any demand for payment, either in whole or in part, the law presumes the bond to be paid or satisfied. But this is a mere presumption, and may be rebutted by facts or circumstances, such as payment of interest, or other acknowledgment that the debt is unpaid. 1 *Phil. Ev.*114; 2 *Stark.*310; 1 *Wheat. Selw.*423; 1 *Stark. Rep.*81; 1 Yeates’ *Rep.*584; 4 *East,*599; 16 *do.*420. The jury are to judge of the extent of defendant’s admissions as an acknowledgment that this bond had not been paid.

Verdict for plaintiff.
#### Robert LOVE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 71-430.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 3, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                      UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                            (Shares in Thousands)
                                 (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Nine Months
                                                            Ended September 30,
                                                            -------------------

                                                             1996          1997
                                                             ----          ----

 <S>                                                      <C>           <C>
Average number of shares outstanding..................     248,392       250,158

Average shares issuable on exercise of stock
   options less shares repurchasable from proceeds....         913           853
                                                           -------       -------

Total average number of common and common
   equivalent shares..................................     249,845       251,011
                                                           =======       =======


Net income (millions).................................     $ 206.5       $ 258.8
                                                           =======       =======

Earnings per share....................................     $  0.83       $  1.03
                                                           =======       =======
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT        10.59

*INDEMNIFICATION        AGREEMENT*

*        Company*
*        Indemnitee*

| 1.*  * | *Certain                Definitions*.                As used herein the following terms shall have the following meanings: |
|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

*Board        of Directors*

*Change        of Control*
*Exchange        Act*
*Incumbent        Board*

*Claim*

*Expenses*

*Indemnifiable        Event*

*Independent        Legal Counsel*

*Person*

*Voting        Securities*

*Basic        Indemnification Arrangement*

*Expense        Advance*

*Indemnification        for Additional Expenses*

*Partial        Indemnity*

*Independent        Legal Counsel Fees*

*No        Presumption*

*Non-exclusivity*

*No        Construction as Employment Agreement*

*Liability        Insurance*

*Period        of Limitations*

*Amendments        and Waiver*

*Subrogation*

*No        Duplication of Payment*

*Miscellaneous*

*Severability*

*Governing        Law*

| By:          |   | /s/ J.                  David Pierson                         |
|--------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         |   |  J.                  David Pierson                            |
|         |   |                                                               |
|  Title: |   | Chairman                  of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|         |   |                                                               |
|         |   | /s/                                                                |
|         |   | Indemnitee                                                         |
EXHIBIT 31.1
       (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
    Date: November 7, 2008
    /s/ PETER J. UNGAROPeter J. UngaroChief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT 13

STOCK DATA

Cox's Class A Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Ticker symbol: COX. Daily newspaper stock table listing: CoxComm A.

As
of February 28, 2002, there were 5,924 shareholders of record of Cox's Class A Common Stock, two shareholders of record of Class C Common Stock and three
shareholders of record of Preferred Stock. There is no established trading market for Cox's Class C Common Stock or Preferred Stock. There have been no stock dividends paid on any of Cox's
equity securities. Cox does not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. See "Management's Discussion and AnalysisLiquidity and Capital ResourcesOther" in the
company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

QUARTERLY MARKET INFORMATION

Class A Common StockHigh

Low2001First Quarter

$
50.25

$
39.36Second Quarter


47.00


39.75Third Quarter


44.44


36.73Fourth Quarter


42.66


36.402000First Quarter

$
58.38

$
41.25Second Quarter


51.50


37.31Third Quarter


47.88


31.69Fourth Quarter


48.00


36.00


---
#### Kate WEAVER, Appellant, v. UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-583.

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Third District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1973.

Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for appellant.

Daniel G. Satin, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and WARD, CHARLES LA VON, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Bergh v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co., Fla.1968, 216 So.2d 436; Columbia Casualty Co. v. Zimmerman, Fla. 1952, 62 So.2d 338; New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Intercity Supply Corp., Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 110; State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Couch, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So.2d 786, cert. denied, Fla., 173 So.2d 146.

*405This affirmation is only as to the propriety of the dismissal of the complaint for declaratory decree and is without prejudice to the plaintiff to seek appropriate relief for damages, if there be any, or for other relief which may be appropriate. Cf. Hunter v. Holtman, Fla.App.1970, 233 So. 2d 197; Swain v. Reliable Ins. Co., Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 862.

Affirmed.
Table 20.  Homeownership Rates by Race and Ethnicity of Householder:  1994 to 2001


                               1994     1995     1996     1997     1998     1999     2000     2001


U.S. total.................    64.0     64.7     65.4     65.7     66.3     66.8     67.4     67.8

  White, total.............    67.7     68.7     69.1     69.3     70.0     70.5     71.1     71.6
    White, nonhispanic.....    70.0     70.9     71.7     72.0     72.6     73.2     73.8     74.3
  Black, total.............    42.3     42.7     44.1     44.8     45.6     46.3     47.2     47.7
  Other race, total/1......    47.7     47.2     51.0     52.5     53.0     53.7     53.5     54.2
      American Indian, Aleu    51.7     55.8     51.6     51.7     54.3     56.1     56.2     55.4
      Asian or Pacific Isla    51.3     50.8     50.8     52.8     52.6     53.1     52.8     53.9
      Other................    36.1     37.4       NA       NA       NA       NA       NA       NA


  Hispanic.................    41.2     42.1     42.8     43.3     44.7     45.5     46.3     47.3
  Non-Hispanic.............    65.9     66.7     67.4     67.8     68.3     68.9     69.5     69.9


/1 Beginning in 1996, those answering 'other' for race were allocated to one of the 4 race categories--
White, Black, American Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo (one category), or Asian or Pacific Islander.
NA - Not Applicable.