alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB09-CR.10 **Contact:**  Deni Luna
Seattle Regional Census Center
206-200-7935
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, OCT. 1, 2009 Media Advisory — Countdown to the 2010 Census: Census Bureau Director to Brief Media on 2010 Census Plans The 2010 Census questionnaire will be one of the shortest ever -- there are only 10 questions, requiring about 10 minutes to complete. Census data are used to apportion congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to local, state and tribal governments each year, and to make decisions about what community services to provide.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 192 

To enhance the energy security of United States allies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2013 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. LEE, Mr. 

COBURN, Mr. ENZI, Mr. BEGICH, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, Mr. VITTER, and Mr. HOEVEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To enhance the energy security of United States allies, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expedited LNG for 

5 American Allies Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPEDITED APPROVAL OF EXPORTATION OF NAT7 URAL GAS TO UNITED STATES ALLIES. 

8 Section 3(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 717b(c)) is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 192 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘For purposes’’; 

2 (2) by striking ‘‘nation with which there is in 

3 effect a free trade agreement requiring national 

4 treatment for trade in natural gas’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘foreign country described in paragraph (2)’’; and 

6 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(2) A foreign country described in this paragraph 

8 is— 

9 ‘‘(A) a nation with which there is in effect a 

10 free trade agreement requiring national treatment 

11 for trade in natural gas; 

12 ‘‘(B) a member country of the North Atlantic 

13 Treaty Organization; 

14 ‘‘(C) subject to paragraph (3), Japan; and 

15 ‘‘(D) any other foreign country if the Secretary 

16 of State, in consultation with the Secretary of De17 fense, determines that exportation of natural gas to 

18 that foreign country would promote the national se19 curity interests of the United States. 

20 ‘‘(3) The exportation of natural gas to Japan shall 

21 be deemed to be consistent with the public interest pursu22 ant to paragraph (1), and applications for such expor23 tation shall be granted without modification or delay 

24 under that paragraph, during only such period as the 

25 Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security, signed at 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 192 IS

1 Washington January 19, 1960, and entered into force 

2 June 23, 1960 (11 UST 1632; TIAS 4509), between the 

3 United States and Japan, remains in effect.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply with 

6 respect to applications for the authorization to export nat7 ural gas under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 

8 U.S.C. 717b) that are pending on, or filed on or after, 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Paris Diane Brown, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00080

- CV v.

Kathy Keith, Appellee Appeal from the 429th District Court of Collin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 429

- 02071

- 2011 ). Opinion delivered by C hief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order that the appellant, Paris Diane Brown, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 1, 2013
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Summary of interagency comments submitted under EO 12866 review of the Methyl Bromide Critical 

Use Exemptions Rule

King, Heidi R. 

to:

Jeremy Arling, Ross Brennan

04/19/2010 10:17 AM

Cc:

"Lee, Amanda I."

Show Details

Good morning,

Below is a summary of comments received from interagency reviewers participating in the EO 12866 review of 

the draft 2010 Methyl Bromide Critical Use Exemptions Final Rule:

1. Overarching comment: Interestingly the benefits to the phaseout of methyl bromide are not mentioned 

in the document. For readers not familiar with this subject, we suggest EPA consider adding a brief 

section or note to references that explain the benefits that are expected with the phaseout of this 

compound, i.e., greater ozone layer preservation afforded via the phase out of ozone depleting 

substances and what this means. We recommend using existing text from a previous rule.

2. Page 22, Background of Critical Use Amounts. This section provides a good background to understand the 

critical uses established in previous years. It might be better suited in a more forward section in the 

document. 

3. Page 27, last paragraph. The paragraph discusses the comment that non-critical users buy methyl 

bromide. EPA states it is not responsible for supply issues. This sounds like an important issue. Should 

EPA consider addressing this question within the rule?

4. Page 32: CUA is not defined until page 44, it should be defined on page 32. 

Best regards,

Heidi King

OMB/OIRA

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jarling\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web7486.htm 4/22/2010
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                       AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE (LOSS) EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Three Months Ended               Nine Months Ended
                                                                    September 30,                   September 30,
                                                               1999             1998            1999             1998
                                                           ------------     ------------    ------------     ------------
<S>                                                        <C>              <C>             <C>              <C>
Net (loss) earnings ...................................    $ (4,961,000)    $    906,000    $ (4,906,000)    $  3,465,000
                                                           ============     ============    ============     ============

Common shares outstanding at beginning of period ......       6,475,069        6,468,903       6,475,069        6,452,904

     Effect of shares issued during the period ........              --            1,136              --           12,485
                                                           ------------     ------------    ------------     ------------

Basic weighted average common shares ..................       6,475,069        6,470,039       6,475,069        6,465,389

Incremental shares from assumed conversions:

     Stock options ....................................              --          140,708              --          155,131
     Warrants .........................................              --           25,257              --           28,813
                                                           ------------     ------------    ------------     ------------

Diluted weighted average common shares ................       6,475,069        6,636,472       6,475,069        6,649,333
                                                           ============     ============    ============     ============

     Basic (loss) earnings per share ..................    $      (0.77)    $       0.14    $      (0.76)    $       0.54

     Diluted (loss) earnings per share ................    $      (0.77)    $       0.14    $      (0.76)    $       0.52
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
           This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
           Atlantic Realty Trust Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and
           Statements of Income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
           such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000948975
<NAME>                        ATLANTIC REALTY TRUST
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         22,778,837
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         37,775,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 60,553,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,240,418
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     56,313,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   60,553,837
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
# C_2011278EN.01000501.xml

| 22.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/5

---

Special Report No 7/2011 ‘Is agri-environment support well designed and managed?’

2011/C 278/06

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 7/2011 ‘Is agri-environment support well designed and managed?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
May 29, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
CHARLES ALLEN DONELL Y , Appellant NO. 14

- 12

- 00429

- CR NO. 14

- 12

- 004 32

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                           2,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,757)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,311
<PP&E>                                          45,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (17,866)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 754,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,805
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           331
<OTHER-SE>                                     377,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   754,025
<SALES>                                        223,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               223,954
<CGS>                                          158,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,318
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,742
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,742
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

                         Continental Global Group, Inc.

               Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31, 2006

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
Subsidiaries (1)                          Organization                            Parent Company

<S>                                      <C>                                     <C>
Continental Conveyor & Equipment Company  Delaware                                Continental Global Group, Inc.

Continental Axle Products, Inc.           Delaware                                Continental Conveyor & Equipment
                                                                                  Company

Continental Conveyor & Equipment Pty.     Australia                               Continental Conveyor & Equipment
Ltd.                                                                              Company

BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.                    Australia                               Continental Conveyor & Equipment Pty.
                                                                                  Ltd.

Continental ACE Pty. Ltd.                 Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Continental ACE Services Pty. Ltd.        Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Continental ACE Conveyor Components       Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.
Pty. Ltd.

A. Crane Pty. Ltd.                        Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Continental Control Systems Pty. Ltd.     Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Continental MECO Pty. Ltd.                Australia                               Continental Conveyor & Equipment Pty.
                                                                                  Ltd.

Continental Conveyor (Beijing) Trading    China                                   Continental Conveyor & Equipment Pty.
Company Limited                                                                   Ltd.

Continental Conveyor International Inc.   Delaware                                Continental Conveyor & Equipment
                                                                                  Company

Continental FSW Ltd.                      United Kingdom                          Continental Conveyor International
                                                                                  Inc.

Continental Conveyor Ltd.                 United Kingdom                          Continental FSW Ltd.

Continental MECO (Proprietary) Ltd.       South Africa                            Continental Conveyor International
                                                                                  Inc.

Goodman Conveyor Company                  Delaware                                Continental Global Group, Inc.
</TABLE>


(1)  Each of the subsidiaries listed is 100% owned by its parent company.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1821 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1821

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
    for the relief of victims of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 12 (legislative day, December 11), 2013

Ms. Hirono (for herself and Mr. Heller) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
    for the relief of victims of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Philippines Charitable Giving 
Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR CHARITABLE CASH 
              CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF OF VICTIMS OF TYPHOON HAIYAN IN 
              THE PHILIPPINES.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any contribution described 
in subsection (b) made after January 1, 2014, and before March 1, 2014, 
as if such contribution was made on December 31, 2013, and not in 2014.
    (b) Contribution Described.--A contribution is described in this 
subsection if such contribution is a cash contribution made for the 
relief of victims in areas affected by Typhoon Haiyan, for which a 
charitable contribution deduction is allowable under section 170 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    (c) Recordkeeping.--In the case of a contribution described in 
subsection (b), a telephone bill showing the name of the donee 
organization, the date of the contribution, and the amount of the 
contribution shall be treated as meeting the recordkeeping requirements 
of section 170(f)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    (d) PAYGO.--All applicable provisions in this section are 
designated as an emergency for purposes of pay-as-you-go principles.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.7 
   





 OBLIGATION EXTENSION AGREEMENT This OBLlGA TCON EXTENSlON AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred
to as "Extension Agreement") is entered into as of January 31, 2022, by and between Specialty Capital Lender LLC, a Wyoming
Limited Liability Company, (hereinafter called "Lender") and Public Company Management Corporation, a Nevada corp-oration (hereinafter
called "PCMC"). WHEREAS, Stephen Brock, as Assignor, did grant, bargain, sell, assign, transfer, and convey unto Lender, for
good and valuable consideration, all of Assignor's right, title and interest in and to all sums due to Assignor under that certain
Promissory Note effective as of September 30, 2016 that was due on October L 2021; WHEREAS, PCMC had entered into various Extension Agreements
prior to the date hereof; and WHEREAS, Lender and PCMC desire to enter into this Extension Agreement in order to extend the due date
of the Promissory Note. NOW, THEREFORE, Lender and PCMC hereby agree as follows: 1. The maturity date of the obligation is extended from
January 31, 2022 to August 3 I , 2022. 2. The unpaid principal of the obligation of $350,000.00 bears simple interest from October 1,
2016 at the interest rate of three (3%) percent per annum. 3. Interest together with the principal due shall be paid on August 31, 2022.
4. All other tem1s and conditions remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lender and PCMC have executed this Extension Agreement effective
as of January 31, 2022. SPECIAL TY CA PTT AL LENDER LLC PUBLIC COMPANY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION By: _---L..6--L~--""~=-__ Name:
Patrick McMahon Title: President-Chief Executive Officer
DISTRICT OFFICE: 150 MOTOR PARKWAY, SUITE 108 HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788 PHONE: (631) 951 2210 PHONF: (516) 505-1448

FAX: (631) 951-3308

Mr. Michael P. Huerta Acting Administrator 

### CCongress of tlp'**~lniteb ~ht±cs**  3Housc o·f**~{rprcsnnhttihcs** STEVE ISRAEL Second District, New York June 13,2012

U.S. Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

DearAdministrator Huerta, WASHINGTON OFFICE: 2457 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICI: BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 PHONE: (202) 225-3335

FAX: (202) 225-4669 www.houso.gov/•stacl

I write to urge the Federal Aviation Administration to lift its moratorium (FAA-2011-0286), which threatens important historic sites, like the American Airpower Museum based in Farmingdale, NY. The American Airpower Museum, located in Farmingdale, is an asset to the Long Island economy. Itis a historic landmark whichbrings in nearly 40,000 visitors each year. TheFAA'sMarch 2011 moratorium has deprived not only Living History Flight Exemption (LHFE) operators, but also veterans, their families, and the public that have yet to go through this historic experience. Even aircraft that have a LHFE exemption are at risk because there is no guarantee that their status will berenewed. Since its inception, the Living History Flight Experience (LHFE) has allowed over 100,000 people to experience aviation history firsthand. Manypassengers are veterans and their families. It would be a shame to prevent military aircraft from being accessible for flight experiences and living history events. I respectfully request you to reassess this policy. TheAmerican Airpower Museum isjustonecase where these historic aircraft help serve as a tribute to America's military and its stronghistory on Long Island. I know that the FAA supports ournation's veterans, which is why I thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

FAA-120711-002 sfhcerely,

# ~**d-~---.** II --.

# ~~S------...._2**?s~ vels** **~ ~ember**  ofCongress
#### Thomas VENN d/b/a Palm Beach Pools, Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION OF PALM BEACH, Appellee.

No. 70-256.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.