alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC MAR - 6 2012 

"FARING DOCKET 

In the Matter of Western Tire Equipment 

and Supply Co., Inc., 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. not assigned 

FDMS No.: FAA 2011-1291 

FAA Region: Western Pacific 

Judge: Richard C. Goodwin v 

^MOTIONTO WITHDRAW-GOMPLAINTU 

To; The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin and Respondent; ^ 

The Regional Counsel for the Western-Pacific Region, Federal Aviation ^' 

Administration (FAA) through counsel, hereby files this Motion for Withdrawal of the 

Complaint and seeks dismissal of this action. This motion is based on the fact the parties 

have settled this matter, therefore a hearing is no longer required. 

Respectfully submitted, 

NAOMI TSUDA 

Regional Counsel 

O^i'^ ' 

By: 

Dated: 

Christopher/Merrill 

Attorney 

FEB 2 8 2012 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certily that on this date I have sent by facsimile where indicated and 

placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified mail - return receipt requested 

Complainant's Motion to Withdraw Complaint, addressed as follows: 

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 hidependence Avenue, SW 

" ' ^ WashingtonrDC-20591—•• 

ONE COPY 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000 

Fax:(202)493-5142 

Hon. Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-230 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

Balog & Rasch, LLP 

Attn: Robert M. Rasch 

1601 Dove Street, Suite 184 

-Newport-BcachrCA-92660-

Fax:(949)851-2520 

Dated: FEB 2 8 2012 

Jeff Kamt^rg, Legal Technici; 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Western-Pacific Region 

Lawndale. California
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00065-CV

Jimmy and Karen Lewis

v.

Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.

§

§

§

§

§

From the 431st District Court

of Denton County

(2013-70726-431)

June 4, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We affirm that 

portion of the trial court’s judgment as to Appellants Jimmy and Karen Lewis’s 

claim for injunctive relief. We reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment as 

to Appellants Jimmy and Karen Lewis’s claim for damages and remand this case 

to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is further ordered that each party shall bear their own costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
No. 11852.

#### The Cleveland City Railway Co. *v.*Von Quiram.

Decided November 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. J. P. Dawley*and *Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Berkeley Pearce*and *Mr. W. PI.*Boyd, for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed. Grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is reversed. And this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered, it is considered and adjudged *524that the judgment of the said court of common pleas be, and it hereby is, reversed, for the following reasons: First, for the admission of evidence as to the manner in which the plaintiff walked, pages 67 and 68 of the printed record; Second, for error' in the instructions to the jury in the following particulars: that, although in said charge the jury were correctly instructed that the “defendant did not insure the absolute safet of the plaintiff but did contract with her to employ a high degree of care and skill to carry her safely to her destination.” yet, in other portions of the charge, it gave and repeated the erroneous instruction that the defendant “engaged to carry her safely to her destination.”

Spear, Davis, Sháuck and Price, JJ., concur.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 22

- 00117

- CV

IN RE GERMANIA SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Proceeding

From the 12th District Court

Madison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21

- 17080

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Germania Select Insurance Company’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus”

is denied. Relator’s “Motion for Emergency Stay” is dis missed as moot.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson , and

Justice Smith

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed May 18, 2022

[OT06]
#### John Lawrence HONCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-712.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 2, 1971.

Motion to transfer granted, and cause transferred to the Supreme Court.
No. 00-7201.

#### Shofner *v.*Comacho et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

Summary of Director, Committee and Chairperson Compensation 

The Board of Directors of the Company approved cash director fees, committee member fees and chairperson fees to be paid to non-management
directors of the Company in fiscal 2017. Director fees, committee fees and chairperson fees are only paid to non-management directors as summarized below: 

Each non-management director will receive a director fee of $15,000 per Board meeting attended in person or by teleconference, paid quarterly
and not to exceed $60,000 per year. 
 Each non-management director who serves on a committee of the Board of Directors will receive a fee of
$1,250 per committee meeting attended in person or by teleconference, paid quarterly and not to exceed $5,000 per year. 
 Each
non-management director who serves as the chairperson of a committee of the Board of Directors shall receive a fee of $625 per committee meeting attended in person or by teleconference, paid quarterly and not to exceed $2,500 per year.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.36 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, FEB. 16, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to Texas http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  For more information on the Census Bureau's Redistricting Data Program, visit  <https://www.census.gov/rdo> and <http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html>. Please visit <http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/> for an interactive map showcasing county-level population change from 1960 to 2010, as well as state-level data on race and Hispanic or Latino origin for 2010. The widget will be updated as states are released and can be embedded on your website. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              68
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                        54
<INVENTORY>                                        792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,204
<PP&E>                                           3,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,368
<BONDS>                                          1,842
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        151
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                         689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,232
<SALES>                                          8,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            4,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                       384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                717
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       717
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.48


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATIONS








Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C.
Section 1350








The
undersigned, Michael L. Asmussen and Ann B. Ruple, in their capacities as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Clean Diesel
Technologies, Inc. (the “Registrant”) do each hereby certify with respect to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this Report.




/s/  Michael L.
      AsmussenMichael
      L. AsmussenPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and DirectorMay
      11, 2009/s/  Ann B.
  RupleAnn
      B. RupleChief
      Financial Officer, Vice President and TreasurerMay
      11, 2009





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), this certification
accompanies the Report and shall not, except to the extent required by the Act,
be deemed filed by Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be
retained by Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### NORTHWEST SEVENTH STREET APARTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, and Joseph S. Popkin, Appellants, v. Suzanne H. SHOCHET, Appellee. 100 N.W. 7TH TERRACE APARTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, and Joseph S. Popkin, Appellants, v. Suzanne H. SHOCHET, Appellee. HAMMONDVILLE APARTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, and Joseph S. Popkin, Appellants, v. Suzanne H. SHOCHET, Appellee. NORTHWEST ELEVENTH AVENUE APARTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, and Joseph S. Popkin, Appellants, v. Suzanne H. SHOCHET, Appellee.

Nos. 73-72, 73-73, 73-75 and 73-74.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 25, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 11065.

#### Rice, Trustee, *v.*Klamut et al.

Decided February 15, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Lorain county.

*Messrs..Klein & Harris*and *Mr. Clayton*Chapman, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. F. M. Stevens; Mr. John M. Pindras*and *Messrs. Ingersoll, Stettson & Wilcox,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew and Davis, JJ., concur.
# C_2012074EN.01000501.xml

| 13.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6441 — Senoble/Agrial/Senagral JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 74/02

On 20 February 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6441. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6441. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of New World Restaurant Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") for
the period ending April 2, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony D. Wedo, as Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|             |  |                                                                                                                                      
|------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 14, 2003 |  | /s/ANTHONY D. WEDOAnthony D. Wedo Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

39

---

QuickLinks
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1180

SHIRE LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SANDOZ, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in

case no. 07-CV-00197, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

ON MOTION

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The William Mitchell College of Law Intellectual Property Institute moves for leave

to file a brief amicus curiae in support of Sandoz, Inc.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

MAY 18 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk	

PILE

US. COURT QF ApDpgAts Fon

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

MAY 1 8 2009

Pt; iiükeshLY

CLERK

Date

cc:	Keith D. Parr, Esq.

Edward H. Haug, Esq.

R. Carl Moy, Esq.

s19
# C_2011308EN.01000401.xml

| 20.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6255 — Terex/Demag Cranes)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 308/04

On 5 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6255. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6255. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-44399, 33-80993, 33-80995, 33-91506 and 33-93148) on Form S-8 and the
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-03351 and 333-03766) on Form S-3 of Cox
Communications, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 1998 on the consolidated
financial statements of Sprint Spectrum Holding Company, L.P. and subsidiaries
(which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
referring to the emergence from the developmental stage of Sprint Spectrum
Holding Company, L.P. and subsidiaries) for each of the three years ended
December 31, 1997 appearing in the Annual Report, as amended, on Form 10-K/A of
Cox Communications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 26, 1998
#### Earnest HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. K-182.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 5, 1968.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 9, 1968.

Earnest Hall, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*66PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
No. 11779.

#### Lynch *v.*The State of Ohio.

Decided October 5, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Delaware county.

*Messrs. Marriott & Freshwater,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Eugene S. Owen,*city solicitor, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Spear and Shauck, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,833
<INVENTORY>                                     77,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,053
<PP&E>                                          15,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,172
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,620
<SALES>                                        158,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,383
<CGS>                                          114,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   459
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,778
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,778
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1647 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal 

distributions for medicine qualified only if for prescribed drug or insulin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2013 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. HELLER, Mr. HATCH, Mr. ENZI, and Mr. FLAKE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to repeal distributions for medicine qualified only if for 

prescribed drug or insulin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Access to 

5 Medication Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1647 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MEDICINE QUALI2 FIED ONLY IF FOR PRESCRIBED DRUG OR IN3 SULIN. 

4 Section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Afford5 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148) and the amendments 

6 made by such section are repealed, and the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such section, and 

8 amendments, had never been enacted. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS