alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012018EN.01000301.xml

| 21.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 January 2012

2012/C 18/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2902 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83390 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7804 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2077 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6990 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3196 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3440 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3640 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2379 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3076 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0145 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6071 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6463 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 463,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2858 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1732 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5670 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 541,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0016 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,940 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,4552 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,719 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2804 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1248 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,8730 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2902

JPY

Japanese yen

99,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83390

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7804

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2077

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,466

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6990

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3196

RON

Romanian leu

4,3440

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3640

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2379

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3076

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0145

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6071

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6463

KRW

South Korean won

1 463,46

ZAR

South African rand

10,2858

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1732

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5670

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 541,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0016

PHP

Philippine peso

55,940

RUB

Russian rouble

40,4552

THB

Thai baht

40,719

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2804

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1248

INR

Indian rupee

64,8730

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012015EN.01000201.xml

| 18.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 January 2012

2012/C 15/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2790 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 98,20 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4353 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83045 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8376 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2090 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6635 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,650 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7001 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3697 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3344 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3523 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2279 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2949 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9328 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5981 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6413 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 462,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2672 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0814 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5445 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 645,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9873 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,780 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2978 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,669 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2661 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2281 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,7780 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2790

JPY

Japanese yen

98,20

DKK

Danish krone

7,4353

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83045

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8376

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2090

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6635

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,650

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7001

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3697

RON

Romanian leu

4,3344

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3523

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2279

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2949

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9328

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5981

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6413

KRW

South Korean won

1 462,15

ZAR

South African rand

10,2672

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0814

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5445

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 645,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9873

PHP

Philippine peso

55,780

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2978

THB

Thai baht

40,669

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2661

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2281

INR

Indian rupee

64,7780

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 4/12/2012

Sample Number: 121550-001 Date Collected: 04/04/2012 08:00 Date Received: 4/4/2012

1st Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 381 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 04/12/2012 12:43 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 121550-002 Date Collected: 04/04/2012 08:00 Date Received: 4/4/2012

2nd Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 7.7 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 04/12/2012 12:48 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 121550-003 Date Collected: 04/04/2012 08:00 Date Received: 4/4/2012

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 0.8 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 04/12/2012 13:02 EPA 200.8

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 121550 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, William J. Gervais, Chief Executive Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
  (1)           the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
  (2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: October 28, 2010


/s/  WILLIAM J. GERVAISWilliam J. Gervais,

Principal Executive Officer
國家新聞草稿 – 地址普查

新聞稿:CB19-CN.08 (Traditional Chinese)

美國人口普查局宣佈啟動 2020 年人口普查第一項重大現場運作 

2019 年 8 月 12 日 — 今天,美國人口普查局向媒體宣告 2020年人口普查的第一項重大現場運作

地址普查開始啟動。地址普查改進並調整全國住戶的人口普查局位址清單,這是遞送人口普查邀

請的必要元素。地址清單對於完整、準確地統計美國居住人口的數量至關重要。

人口普查局局長 Steven Dillingham 說:「人口普查局的使命就是確保一切步入正軌,做好完成

2020 年人口普查任務的準備」。「過去十年,我們進行了多項改進和創新,包括更好的鄰里普查

技術,並制訂出了完整的、更新的地址清單和地圖」。

人口普查局開發了名為 Block Assessment, Research and Classification Application (BARCA)的新軟

體。它能不斷比較美國的衛星圖像,從而讓人口普查局的員工能發現新開發的住房、現有住宅的

變化和以前不存在的其他住房單元。審核人員還使用BARCA 比較每個街區當前圖像中的住房單元

數量和檔案中地址的數量。

「我們可以使用衛星圖像核實 65% 的地址 — 對於我們來說,這是一項巨大的成就」,人口普查

局地理部主任 Deirdre Bishop在公告會上這樣說。「2010年我們雇用了 150,000 個人核實所有現

場地址 ,這十年我們將只需在全國雇用大約 40,000 員工來核實剩餘的 35% 的地址量」。

人口普查局員工 (造冊人) 已開始在全國走訪鄰里,檢查BARCA 軟體未核實的 35% 的地址。現場

地址普查將持續到十月中旬。

為幫助識別地址造冊人,員工將佩戴身份牌並攜帶公事包,標識他們的人口普查局身份。他們將

敲門並詢問幾個簡單的問題,以便核真實地址和房產中任何要納入人口普查的其他住所。

員工將介紹他們是人口普查局的工作人員、出示他們的正式政府身份牌,並解釋此次走訪的目

的。主人也可以要求他們出示其他機構頒發的有照片的 ID 核實其身份。

2020 年人口普查: 現場地址普查(IFAC)檢視器提供了造冊人將走訪區域的縣區資訊。

這是人口普查局為完整、準確地計算數量開展的幾項活動之一。人口普查局還與美國郵政局、部

落、州和地方的官員合作來更新地址清單。

「人口普查的成功最終還要依靠每個人的參與」,芝加哥區域主任 Marilyn Sanders 說。「並請記

住,您對人口普查的回應是在塑造自己的未來和您所在社區的未來」。

2020 年人口普查將於 2020 年 1 月從邊遠的阿拉斯加東秀灣正式開始計算人口數量。在統計完阿

拉斯加的人口數量後,全國大部分住戶將于 2020年 3 月開始通過線上、電話或郵寄收到普查邀

請。

美國憲法強制規定,需要每 10年進行一次人口普查。人口普查資料用於確定各州在國會中的席位

數量,及每年如何向州和地方社區分配超過 6750億美元的聯邦資金用於服務和基礎設施,包括

醫療保健、工作機會、學校、道路和企業。

要瞭解地址普查的更多資訊,請登錄人口普查局網站。

###
國家新聞草稿 – 地址普查

Daniel Velez

公共資訊辦公室 census.gov

301-763-3030 / pio@census.gov 通過社交媒體聯繫我們
TS-CCGL81

Attachment #11

Test Data on the New Chemical Substances 

Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test 
TS-CCGL81
<PAGE>

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                           ---------------------------


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



      Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 22, 2000

                           TELECOMM INDUSTRIES, CORP.

             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



       Delaware                         0-4410                    34-1765902

   (State or other                 (commission file             (IRS employer
   jurisdiction of                      number)              identification no.)
    incorporation)



                         8450 Westfield Blvd., Suite 100
                           Indianapolis, Indiana 46240

              (Address of principal executive offices and zip code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (317) 202-3000


<PAGE>

Item 5.           Other Events.

                  The Company's President and CEO resigned his position as such
on September 18, 2000, as described more fully in the attached Press Release
filed on September 22, 2000. Mr. Satterthwaite will remain as a director of the
Company. Mr. Raymond W. Sheets, Jr., the Company's acting Chairman of the Board,
was named Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board until such time and
the Board selects a permanent replacement for Mr. Satterthwaite.

Item 7.           Financial Statements and Exhibits.

                  (c)      Exhibits

                           (99.3)            Press Release of the Company dated
                                             September 22, 2000


                                      -2-
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

                  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                            TELECOMM INDUSTRIES CORP.

                                            SS// Raymond W. Sheets

Date: September 22, 2000            By:     _____________________________
                                            Raymond W. Sheets, Jr.
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chairman of the Board.


                                      -3-
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
  No.                               Description
-------                             -----------


  99.3                                   Press Release of Telecomm
                                         Industries Corp. dated September
                                         22, 2000
Exhibit 4.2


  


Caravelle
International Group 


 


Number


 


Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands


 


Share capital is US$50,000 divided
into


500,000,000 Ordinary Shares of a par
value of US$0.0001 each


  


THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT                            
is the registered holder of                           Ordinary
Share(s) in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof.


 


EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the
                       
day of                                          
20     by:


   


	DIRECTOR
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                        1,366,654
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 868,307
<ALLOWANCES>                  576,775
<INVENTORY>                   132,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              3,294,785
<PP&E>                        3,696,832
<DEPRECIATION>                2,879,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                11,774,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,934,986
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   10
<COMMON>                      27,563
<OTHER-SE>                    6,649,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  11,774,455
<SALES>                       348,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              348,228
<CGS>                         116,541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,909,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              7,662,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            38,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,740,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,671,138)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,671,138)
<EPS-BASIC>                 (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.06)
<FN>
THIN SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### Marwell Jon SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-300.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 4, 1974.

Robert H. Schultz, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment on a charge of robbery, and to five years on the charge of person engaged in criminal offense, having weapon, the sentences to run concurrently.

We affirm the judgments on authority of Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Dean v. State, Fla.1973, 277 So.2d 13; and Reams v. State, Fla.1973, 279 So. 2d 839.

Although not raised on appeal, we conclude that the trial court erred in imposing upon appellant two separate sentences for the two crimes which the record reveals were facets of the same criminal act, since the only valid sentence that could have been entered was for the highest offense. Cone v. State, Fla.1973, 285 So.2d 12.

The sentence on the lesser offense is vacated, and the judgment is

Affirmed as modified.

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     UT

<LEGEND>                      The schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from Consolidated
                              Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Statement of
                              Cash Flows for Consolidated
                              Edison, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety
                              by reference to such financial statements
                              and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>  
<CIK>  0001047862
<NAME> Consolidated Edison, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C> 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-END>                  Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-Mos

<BOOK-VALUE>                  Per-Book

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>     11,406,543

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>      378,445

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>         1,093,543

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>         551,856

<OTHER-ASSETS>                   951,016

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                14,381,403

<COMMON>                         588,720

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>        857,175

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>            4,700,500

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ> 6,025,605

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             37,050

<PREFERRED>                      212,563

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>           4,050,108

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                     0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>              0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>         0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>    225,000

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>              0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>       37,295

<LEASES-CURRENT>                   2,584

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB> 3,791,198

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB> 14,381,403

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>      7,093,048

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>             407,639

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>     5,632,084

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>     6,039,723

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>        1,053,325

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                 2,249

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN> 1,055,574

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>         325,825

<NET-INCOME>                     729,749

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>       17,007

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>    712,742

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>         496,945

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>        308,671

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>         1,365,757

<EPS-PRIMARY>                       3.04

<EPS-DILUTED>                       3.04
        


</TABLE>
#### In re ESTATE of Robert E. WILLIAMS, Deceased. Emma Hayes WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Lucille R. WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. 73-241.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 12, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1974.

I. W. Williams of Minnis, Williams & Milton, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Jerry D. Bell, St. Petersburg, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Barretti v. Twomey, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 289.

MANN, C. J., GRIMES, J., and NANCE, L. CLAYTON, Associate Judge, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          44,205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,835
<PP&E>                                         439,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,056,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          110,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           365
<OTHER-SE>                                     353,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,056,974
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               367,984
<CGS>                                          283,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  333,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,384
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,826
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (195)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,631
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 09

- 00190

- CV

IN RE NANCY BAKER AN D MIKE EVERETT

AS THE PARENTS OF A. E., A CHILD

Original Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition f or writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna , and

Justice Davis

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 9 , 2009

[ OT06]
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-40791 Summary Calendar

WILLIE RAY COLE, Petitioner-Appellant

v. JODY UPTON, Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CV-257
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: * Willie Ray Cole appeals the dismis s a l o f a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his 3 6 0

- m o nth s e ntence for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Cole previously

was unsuccessful on direct appeal and pu r suant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Cole argued, in the instant § 2241 petition, inter alia, that he was actually innocent of being a career offender. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D May1, 201 2 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-40791 Document: 00511840647 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/01/2012No. 11-40791

As a ge neral rule, a federal prisoner who seeks to collaterally challenge the l e g ality of his conviction or sentence must file pursuant to § 2255. Padil la v . United States , 416 F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir. 2005). Such claims may be raised in a § 2241 petition under the savings clause of § 2255(e) only if the prisoner shows that the § 2255 remedy is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” § 2255(e). Cole has not made such a showing because he has not established that his claims are based on a retroactively a pplicable Supreme Court decision establishing that he was convicted of a nonexistent offense. See Reyes-Requena

v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Moreover, a claim of actual innocence of a career offender enhancement is not a claim of actual innocence of the crime of conviction and, thus, not the type of claim that w a rr a n t s review under § 2241. See Kinder v. Purdy , 222 F.3d 209, 213-14 (5th Cir. 2000); see also Padilla , 416 F.3d at 426-27. Cole has not shown th a t h e is entitled to proceed under § 2241 based on the savings clause of § 2255(e). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-40791 Document: 00511840647 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/01/2012