alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ZYCON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                             OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                   (unaudited)
                      (In thousands, except per share data)



                                          Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                             September 30,       September 30,
                                          ------------------   -----------------
                                            1996      1995       1996      1995
                                           ------    ------     ------    ------

Net income                                $ 1,914              $ 7,413
                                          =======              -------
Pro forma net income                                 $ 2,370             $ 4,634
                                                     =======             =======

Weighted average shares outstanding
     during the period                     11,053      8,000    11,020     8,000
           
Common shares issued and stock options
     granted in accordance with Staff
     Accounting Bulletin No. 83                           97                  97

Common Stock Equivalents                       38                   70

Shares deemed outstanding to fund final
     shareholder distribution                            553                 553
                                         --------    -------   -------    ------

Total shares outstanding for purposes
 of calculating primary and fully
 diluted earnings per share                11,091      8,650    11,090     8,650
                                         ========    =======   =======   =======

Net Income per common and
     common stock equivalent share       $   0.17              $  0.67
                                         ========              =======

Pro forma primary earnings per common and
     common stock equivalent share                   $  0.27             $  0.54
                                                     =======             =======
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 38759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16903]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 9, 2018.

PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing Room 10800.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 2, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16903 Filed 8-3-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
SERVED: MARCH 4, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WORLD LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS, LLC 

DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-0207 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

~-~ T r . ____ _ ··- . ... n ; __ . ·: 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014-GL-70-0263) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
--------------------------............. ...... 

SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

' ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI ooo1 

/ 

Amielina Elhassani, Principal 

Viabox, Respondent 

25883 N Park A venue 

Elkhart, IN 46514 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue, AGL-7 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7862 

FAJ<: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAJ<: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0207 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

4
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1963 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 298
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1963

      To repeal section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 2014

   Mr. Pryor (for himself, Mrs. Hagan, Mrs. Shaheen, and Mr. Begich) 
      introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                            January 28, 2014

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To repeal section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REDUCTIONS MADE BY THE BIPARTISAN BUDGET 
              ACT OF 2013.

    Section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113-
67) is repealed as of the date of the enactment of such Act.
                                                       Calendar No. 298

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1963

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

      To repeal section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 28, 2014

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertify that pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) ofHearst-Argyle Television, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at and for the periods indicated.

 

Dated:  July 28, 2006

 
|   | By:    | /S/ DAVID J. BARRETT                   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | David J. Barrett                       |
|   | Title: | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 
|   | By:    | /S/ HARRY T. HAWKS                                    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Harry T. Hawks                                        |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

585 

KA 12-02148 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JORGE DEJESUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SHERRY A. CHASE OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County

(Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered October 19, 2012. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of criminal possession of

a weapon in the second degree (two counts). 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon a nonjury verdict of two counts of criminal possession of a

weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). Supreme Court

properly refused to suppress defendant’s statements and the weapons

seized from the basement of his mother’s home. Contrary to

defendant’s contention, the People established that defendant’s mother

voluntarily consented to the search of her home (see People v May, 100

AD3d 1411, 1412, lv denied 20 NY3d 1063; People v McCray, 96 AD3d

1480, 1481, lv denied 19 NY3d 1104). Defendant’s remaining

contentions regarding the suppression hearing are not preserved for

our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power

to review those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest

of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). “To the extent that defendant

contends that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to raise

[those issues] at the suppression hearing, we reject that contention

because [t]here can be no denial of effective assistance of . . .

counsel arising from [defense] counsel’s failure to make a motion or

argument that has little or no chance of success” (People v Watson, 90

AD3d 1666, 1667, lv denied 19 NY3d 868 [internal quotation marks

omitted]).

Defendant next contends that the verdict is against the weight of

the evidence because he had only temporary innocent possession of the

weapons. We reject that contention (see People v Hicks, 110 AD3d
-2- 585 

KA 12-02148 

1488, 1488, lv denied 22 NY3d 1156). A person may be found to have

had temporary and lawful possession of a weapon if, for example, “he

found the weapon shortly before his possession of it was discovered

and he intended to turn it over to the authorities” (People v

Almodovar, 62 NY2d 126, 130). The court here rejected that defense

inasmuch as defendant did not turn over the weapons to the police

despite the opportunity to do so. Viewing the evidence in light of

the elements of the crime in this nonjury trial (see People v

Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not

against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley,

69 NY2d 490, 495). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or

severe.

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH MALIK EVANS, III,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 699 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32.1

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph B. Leonard, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1)          | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and                   
|------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2)          | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|             |                                                                                                                                                     
|May 10, 2004 | By:                                                                                                                                                 
|             |                                                                                                                                                     
|             |
Robb Patton 5549 old plank rd iron station NC, 28080

980.241.3980

We are writing pursuant to the FAA modernization and reform act of 2012, to request that Patton and Son LLC DBA as Littlebirds View, an owner and operator of small unmanned aircraft, be exempt from the Federal Aviation Regulations listed below so that Littlebirds View may operate its small unmanned aircraft, commercially and airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration, as long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined here in or as may be established by the FAA as required by section 333.

Robb Patton is an ATP rated pilot as well as a part 125 check airman. His 16 years of experience as an ATP pilot includes part 91,121& 125 operations. The other operator in Littlebirds View is Mitzi Patton, Robb’s spouse. She is a commercially rated pilot as well as CFII with thousands of hours in various aircraft. Both parties have been in R/C modeling for a combined 35 years.

Littlebirds View exemption request would permit it’s operation of lightweight UAS’s in a tightly controlled and limited airspace predetermined, specifically marked areas of operation, cordoned off locations and corresponding enhancements to current safety controls will allow little Birdsview to operate within current safety parameters and new ones being implemented. Littlebirds View would perform a geographical online assessment, followed by an on-site assessment of any hazards, or airspace conflict. A job would only be carried out in VFR conditions where GPS RAIM was at an acceptable level according to fltplan.com. Standard Operating Procedures are in place for normal and abnormal operation. An on-site assessment will be completed and stored electronically.

Littlebirds View respectfully request the grant of an exemption allowing it to operate lightweight, remote-controlled UAS’s.

The specific sections of title 14 of the code of federal regulations, Littlebirds View request exemptions are: 14 CFR 21; 14 CFR 45.20 3(b); 14 CFR 61.113(a)&(b) ; 14 CFR 407(a)(l); 14 CFR 409(a)(2) and, 14 CFR 417(a)&(b).

Exemption request section 333 of the FAA reform act and part two of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 CFR 45.23(b); 14 CFR part 21; 14 CFR 61.113(a)&(b) ; 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a)&(b)

Littlebirds View submits this application in accordance with the Reform Act, relief from any current applicable FAR’s operating to prevent Littlebirds View contemplated commercial cinematic and other flight.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         235,969
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  301,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               537,647
<PP&E>                                       8,380,418
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,228,138)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,689,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,689,927
<SALES>                                        353,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               355,159
<CGS>                                          286,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  286,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,971
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,152
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

To: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ 

Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, "Laity, Jim" 

<James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 03/23/2012 08:36 PM

Subject: Interagency Comments on latest draft of NSPS EGU preamble

Attached are some additional comments for consideration on the executive summary portion of the 

latest draft of the EGU NSPS preamble. 

The intention is to have a short, readable, plain language summary that also includes a brief statement 

of the relevant legal authority for the rulemaking.

Please call me if first thing Monday if you have any questions. If you provide a time and number to 

reach you this weekend I am happy to discuss before hand as well.

Regards,

Nathan
# C_2011299EN.01000901.xml

| 11.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/9

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2011/C 299/08

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Malta

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Malta

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), the Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Malta

Subject of commemoration: First elected representatives

Description of the design: The centre of the coin shows a hand putting a vote into a ballot box. At the bottom, the year ‘2011’. At the top, extending to the right along the inner ring, the words ‘Malta — First elected representatives 1849’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued:

Date of issue: Second half of 2011

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# C_2011337EN.01000401.xml

| 18.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 November 2011

2011/C 337/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3480 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4427 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85400 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1747 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2387 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8205 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,646 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,17 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7031 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4388 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3638 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4465 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3403 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3821 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4965 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7645 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7453 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 527,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0981 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5669 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4960 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 152,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2577 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,579 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,5989 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,653 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4000 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4609 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,6740 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3480

JPY

Japanese yen

103,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4427

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85400

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1747

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2387

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8205

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,646

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,17

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7031

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4388

RON

Romanian leu

4,3638

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4465

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3403

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3821

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4965

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7645

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7453

KRW

South Korean won

1 527,79

ZAR

South African rand

11,0981

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5669

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4960

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 152,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2577

PHP

Philippine peso

58,579

RUB

Russian rouble

41,5989

THB

Thai baht

41,653

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4000

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4609

INR

Indian rupee

68,6740

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---