alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 


For good and
valuable consideration ILUSTRATO PICTURES INTERNATIONAL, INC, a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”), and AES
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC (the “Holder”), a Puerto Rico LLC with offices at 151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
PMB 546, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00901-1607, agree that certain provisions of the Convertible Promissory Note issued from the Company in
the amount of $375,000.00 on September 10, 2021 (the “Note”) are being amended as set forth in this agreement (“Agreement”):


 


		1.	The Maturity Date of the Note is hereby extended by a period of 6 months from the
original date of September 10th 2022 to March 10th 2023, during this period of time the Holder waives any penalty
interest that would otherwise have occurred due to the failure to timely repay the Note on or prior to the original maturity date



 


		2.	This Agreement, and the Note, are governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of Nevada applicable to contracts made and wholly to be performed within the State of Nevada and shall be binding upon the successors
and assigns of each party hereto. The Holder and the Company hereby mutually waive trial by jury and consent to exclusive jurisdiction
and venue in the courts of the State of Nevada or in the Federal courts sitting in the counties of either Washoe county, Nevada or Clark
County, Nevada.



 


		3.	All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning defined
to them in the Note.



 


 


All other terms
of the Note not modified by the terms of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed effective
October 28, 2021.


 


“Company”:


ILUSTRATO PICTURES INTERNATIONAL, INC.


 


 


By: /s/ Nicolas Link


Its: CEO


Print Name:


 


“Holder”:


AES CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC


 


 


By: /s/ Eli Alan Safdieh


Eli Alan Safdieh, Manager
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Otis James LEWIS.

No. 59885.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

*1198Sam Nelken, Natchitoches, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ronald C. Martin, Dist. Atty., John Stephens, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM:

In *State*v. *Lewis,*No. 58,774, decided by this Court on March 9, 1977, this defendant’s conviction was affirmed, but the sentence was vacated and set aside and the case remanded to the trial court for resentencing. *State*v. *Lewis,*343 So.2d 732 (La.1977). Subsequently the defendant was brought before the trial court and resen-tenced to twenty-five years at hard labor in the custody of the Department of Corrections without eligibility for probation, parole or suspension of sentence. A new appeal was then entered on behalf of the defendant. Defendant does have a right to appeal from the imposition of the new sentence. La.Const., Art. 5, § 5(D)(2X1974); La.C.Cr.P. art. 912.1. However, defendant’s conviction had already been affirmed and the judgment therein was final fourteen days after its rendition upon the failure of defendant to file an application for a rehearing. La.C.Cr.P. art. 922. Any additional issues defendant wishes to raise in connection with his conviction, including an argument relative to effective assistance of counsel, must be brought to the attention of the courts by application for writs of habe-as corpus. *See State*v. *Ross,*343 So.2d 722 (La.1977); *State v. Mouton,*327 So.2d 413 (La.1976).

As the sentence imposed upon the defendant is a legal one for the offense of armed robbery, La.R.S. 14:64, the sentence is affirmed.
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Second Quarter 1998 and 1997


                             Second     Second    Standard   Standard
Age of householder           Quarter    Quarter   error on   error on
                                 1998       1997  1998 rate difference

United States..............      66.0       65.7        0.2        0.2

    Less than 25 years.....      17.9       18.7        0.6        0.9
    25 to 29 years.........      36.1       35.0        0.6        0.8
    30 to 34 years.........      53.4       51.6        0.6        0.8
    35 to 39 years.........      62.9       62.5        0.5        0.7
    40 to 44 years.........      69.5       70.3        0.5        0.7
    45 to 49 years.........      73.2       73.8        0.5        0.7
    50 to 54 years.........      78.3       77.8        0.5        0.8
    55 to 59 years.........      78.7       79.8        0.6        0.8
    60 to 64 years.........      82.4       80.8        0.6        0.9
    65 to 69 years.........      81.4       81.9        0.6        0.8
    70 to 74 years.........      82.4       81.9        0.6        0.9
    75 years and over......      76.3       75.9        0.5        0.7

      Less than 35 years...      39.3       38.6        0.4        0.5
      35 to 44 years.......      66.2       66.3        0.4        0.5
      45 to 54 years.......      75.5       75.6        0.4        0.5
      55 to 64 years.......      80.4       80.3        0.4        0.6
      65 years and over....      79.2       79.1        0.3        0.5
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  
           1965 to 1995 

                 First    Second     Third     Fourth 
    Year       Quarter   Quarter   Quarter    Quarter
                                                        
 1995.......     64.2  
 1994.......     63.8      63.8      64.1       64.2
 1993\r.....     63.7      63.9      64.2       64.2
                                                   
 1993.......     64.2      64.4      64.7       64.6
 1992.......     64.0      63.9      64.3       64.4
 1991.......     63.9      63.9      64.2       64.2
 1990.......     64.0      63.7      64.0       64.1
 1989\r.....     63.9      63.8      64.1       63.8
                                                    
 1989.......     63.9      63.9      64.0       63.8
 1988.......     63.7      63.7      64.0       63.8
 1987.......     63.8      63.8      64.2       64.1
 1986.......     63.6      63.8      63.8       63.9
 1985.......     64.1      64.1      63.9       63.5
 1984.......     64.6      64.6      64.6       64.1
 1983.......     64.7      64.7      64.8       64.4
 1982.......     64.8      64.9      64.9       64.5
 1981.......     65.6      65.3      65.6       65.2
 1980.......     65.5      65.5      65.8       65.5
 1979\r.....     64.8      64.9      65.8       65.4
                                                    
 1979.......     65.3      65.1      66.0       65.8
 1978.......     64.8      64.4      65.2       65.4
 1977.......     64.8      64.5      65.0       64.9
 1976.......     64.6      64.6      64.9       64.8
 1975.......     64.4      64.9      64.6       64.5
 1974.......     64.8      64.8      64.6       64.4
 1973.......     64.9      64.4      64.4       64.4
 1972.......     64.3      64.5      64.3       64.4
 1971.......     64.0      64.1      64.4       64.5
 1970.......     64.3      64.0      64.4       64.0
 1969.......     64.1      64.4      64.4       64.4
 1968.......     63.6      64.1      64.1       63.6
 1967.......     63.3      63.9      63.8       63.5
 1966.......     63.5      63.2      63.3       63.8
 1965.......     62.9      62.9      62.9       63.4
                                                    
 \r Revised.                                        

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1431 

To permanently extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. THUNE, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. 

BEGICH, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs. HAGAN, Mr. HELLER, Mr. UDALL of New 

Mexico, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, Mr. SCOTT, and Mr. 

COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To permanently extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Tax Freedom 

5 Forever Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) The Internet has continued to drive eco9 nomic growth, productivity and innovation since the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1431 IS

1 Internet Tax Freedom Act was first enacted in 

2 1998. 

3 (2) The Internet promotes a nationwide eco4 nomic environment that facilitates innovation, pro5 motes efficiency, and empowers people to broadly 

6 share their ideas. 

7 (3) According to the National Broadband Plan, 

8 cost remains the biggest barrier to consumer 

9 broadband adoption. Keeping Internet access afford10 able promotes consumer access to this critical gate11 way to jobs, education, healthcare, and entrepre12 neurial opportunities, regardless of race, income, or 

13 neighborhood. 

14 (4) Small business owners rely heavily on af15 fordable Internet access, providing them with access 

16 to new markets, additional consumers, and an op17 portunity to compete in the global economy. 

18 (5) Economists have recognized that excessive 

19 taxation of innovative communications technologies 

20 reduces economic welfare more than taxes on other 

21 sectors of the economy. 

22 (6) The provision of affordable access to the 

23 Internet is fundamental to the American economy 

24 and access to it must be protected from multiple and 

25 discriminatory taxes at the State and local level. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1431 IS

1 (7) As a massive global network that spans po2 litical boundaries, the Internet is inherently a matter 

3 of interstate and foreign commerce within the juris4 diction of the United States Congress under article 

5 I, section 8, clause 3 of the Constitution of the 

6 United States. 

7 SEC. 3. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS 

8 TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND DISCRIMINATORY 

9 TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a) of the Internet 

11 Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by 

12 striking ‘‘ during the period beginning November 1, 2003, 

13 and ending November 1, 2014’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxes imposed after the date 

16 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Helene B. Benincasa et al., Appellants, v Village of Irvington, Respondent.

[737 NYS2d 295]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), entered December 14, 2000, which, upon the granting of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law made, at the close of evidence, is in favor of the defendant and against them, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law. On the evidence presented, there is no rational process by which the finder of fact could reach a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs *(see, Szczerbiak v Pilat,*90 NY2d 553). Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, the prior written notice requirements of Village Law § 6-628 apply *(see, Donnelly v Village of Perry,*88 AD2d 764). The plaintiffs conceded that the defendant did not have prior written notice of the defective condition, and failed to show that the defendant created the condition by an affirmative act of negligence or that its use of the property constituted a special use for its benefit *(see, ITT Hartford Ins. Co. v Village of Ossining,*257 AD2d 606; *Barnes v City of Mount Vernon,*245 AD2d 407). Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Prudenti, JJ., concur.
#### ALLIED DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CORAL GABLES, Appellee.

No. 71-574.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 21, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 20, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36590-36591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16399]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Correction and Approval of Minutes for June 28, 2018
Draft Advisory Opinion 2018-08: Issa
Draft Advisory Opinion 2018-10: United Utah Party Candidate Committee

[[Page 36591]]

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, 
at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

Dayna C. Brown,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-16399 Filed 7-26-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Patrick Goodwin, ERG

DATE: September 30, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the National Scale Immediate 

Receiving Water Model [DCN SE04553]

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the National 

Scale Immediate Receiving Water (IRW) Model, developed as part of the Environmental 

Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power 

Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA-821-R-15-006 (DCN 

SE04527). The supporting documentation for this model includes the files listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Supporting Documentation

Attachment 

ID Document Name Brief Description

A1

Attachment 1: CBI_Final 

Steam EA IRW Model -

Water Quality Module -

Comparison Database -

Option A (CCR) - DCN 

SE04553A1

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results 

between baseline and Option A. Generates inputs for the Water 

Quality Module Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for 

the CCR rulemaking.

A2

Attachment 2: CBI_Final 

Steam EA IRW Model -

Water Quality Module -

Comparison Database -

Option B (CCR) - DCN 

SE04553A2

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results 

between baseline and Option B. Generates inputs for the Water 

Quality Module Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for 

the CCR rulemaking.

A3

Attachment 3:

CBI_Final Steam EA 

IRW Model - Water 

Quality Module -

Comparison Database -

Option C (CCR) - DCN 

SE04553A3

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results 

between baseline and Option C. Generates inputs for the Water 

Quality Module Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for 

the CCR rulemaking.

A4

Attachment 4: CBI_Final 

Steam EA IRW Model -

Water Quality Module -

Comparison Database -

Option D (CCR) - DCN 

SE04553A4

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results 

between baseline and Option D. Generates inputs for the Water 

Quality Module Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for 

the CCR rulemaking.
A5

Attachment 5: CBI_Final 

Steam EA IRW Model -

Water Quality Module -

Comparison Database -

Option E (CCR) - DCN 

SE04553A5

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results 

between baseline and Option E. Generates inputs for the Water 

Quality Module Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for 

the CCR rulemaking.
#### In re ESTATE of Edgar C. McBRIDE, Deceased. William SANDERS, Appellant, v. William J. McLEOD, as Executor for the Estate of Edgar C. McBride, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 73-494.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:

           First Quarter 2007 and 2008



           (Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)





                                                   First Quarter 2007



Type of housing unit

                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West

                                           States     east      West



All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100



    Year-round vacant....................     10.5       8.1      10.2      12.8       9.0

      For rent...........................      3.1       2.4       3.4       3.8       2.3

      For sale only......................      1.7       1.1       1.9       2.0       1.5

      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.9       0.7       0.8       0.9       0.9

      Held off market....................      4.8       3.9       4.1       6.1       4.3

        For occasional use...............      1.6       0.9       0.9       2.1       1.9

        Temporarily occupied by persons

        with usual residence elsewhere...      1.0       0.9       0.8       1.3       0.8

        For other reasons................      2.3       2.1       2.5       2.7       1.6



    Seasonal vacant......................      3.3       4.3       2.8       3.1       3.2



    Occupied.............................     86.2      87.6      87.0      84.1      87.8







                                                   First Quarter 2008





                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West

                                           States     east      West



All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100



    Year-round vacant....................     10.7       8.4      10.8      12.5       9.3

      For rent...........................      3.1       2.5       3.3       3.8       2.5

      For sale only......................      1.8       1.2       1.9       1.9       1.8

      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.6       0.8       1.0       0.6

      Held off market....................      5.0       4.1       4.8       5.8       4.4

        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.0       1.0       2.0       2.0

        Temporarily occupied by persons

        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.8       1.0       1.0       0.8

        For other reasons................      2.5       2.4       2.8       2.8       1.6



    Seasonal vacant......................      3.6       4.2       3.2       3.8       3.4



    Occupied.............................     85.7      87.4      86.0      83.7      87.3
CERTIFICATE OF ADMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF
                                 NEW YORK, INC.

              Under Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law

                             --------------------


      We, JOAN S. FREILICH and ARCHIE M. BANKSTON,  being  respectively a Senior
Vice  President and the Secretary of  Consolidated  Edison  Company of New York,
Inc., a corporation  formed under the laws of the State of New York (hereinafter
sometimes called the "Company"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:

      1. The name of the  Company is  CONSOLIDATED  EDISON  COMPANY OF NEW YORK,
INC. It was originally  incorporated  under the name of Consolidated Gas Company
of New York.

      2.  The   Certificate   of   Incorporation   of  the  Company  (being  the
Consolidation  Agreement  dated  September  29,  1884,  pursuant to which it was
organized) was filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of New
York on November 10, 1884.  The Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of the
Company  was  filed  by the  Department  of  State  of the  State of New York on
December 31, 1984.

      3. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Company,  as amended, is hereby
further amended to change the authorized number of Trustees.

      4. To effect the foregoing:

            Article Eighth, is hereby amended, in the following form:

            "EIGHTH:  The number of Trustees shall be not more than 16."


      5. This amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation  was duly authorized
 and approved by the unanimous vote of the Trustees  present at a meeting of the
 Board of Trustees of the Company duly called and held on December 12, 1997,  at
 which meeting a quorum was present and acting throughout and by the vote of the
 holders  of more than a majority  of the  outstanding  shares of $5  Cumulative
 Preferred  Stock and Common Stock of the Company,  voting  together as a single
 class, at a meeting thereof duly called and held on December 12, 1997, at which
 meeting a quorum was present and acting throughout.








<PAGE>


                                    - 2 -






      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  we have made and subscribed  this  certificate,  and
affirm  the same as true  under  the  penalties  of  perjury,  this  17th day of
February, 1998.






                        ----------------------------
                               Joan S. Freilich
                            Senior Vice President




                        ----------------------------
                             Archie M. Bankston
                                Secretary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMADOR LUEVANOS-GARCIA, AKA 

Guillermo Garcia Espinosa, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-72944 

Agency No. A090-344-153 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an 

Immigration Judge’s Decision

Submitted March 13, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Amador Luevanos-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) 

that he did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in Mexico, and thus 

is not entitled to relief from his reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-72944 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual 

findings, Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016), and we 

deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Luevanos-Garcia 

failed to establish a reasonable possibility of future persecution in Mexico on 

account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 

2010) (“An [applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated 

by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected 

ground.”).

Substantial evidence also supports the conclusion that Luevanos-Garcia 

failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or 

acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See Andrade-Garcia, 828 F.3d at 836-

37.

We reject Luevanos-Garcia’s contention that the IJ failed to consider all of

his claims and evidence.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.