alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Lt)Jllfar\ Mis*) M\^^ (hud o£ Apf&ds ~fet^&ik^fof Tarn,I o *% ' A 

### 3v /<? /^y^ 4*^ #//** &/J^:'>>* / ^>


### ^ >^?^*5 CfApvs de£*r*t <2»u*L<f0-£Ap^h tftuy.

DotJ/*^P*. a^«« •*»</ ^Ju/03£*»'<:J/jrr* ##_ £>i?<y/gifjg Oa&U] 

### Zjl g*R*k //askTM. jrv„ //^»$ o^ ^ fl<J,s^t7,z

IP^ 4/ti CWW c^/y (oPrt 7^? i^4/i6 8^; ^/4iW asttpfUrK. S./htA-VTzAAs 431 ^vazX 44% &fa T$x <!;DAn/f1W n ^*f+>*£*•*? . f* n Hppxals -teem 71e Uj^lh/c 

## *"&*tT«o^, ^ July A>3*0 /^, oCl / ^^ IV' <5<T<^Oklwn CJW'S SUl*4 "That's w^v* ~js*_ ^w -r^/*/ ' 

### 1^-7»t (kuucf tfHSn -Px pteJZ&ifJ Timi fe*bJ*?f* % ^TX -Th* d&u*-1 dm frfdf/er*- Ji" //*& y#7» ( /fad /trfsf^y \ 

### (Mlcnn Cmotc uM* 1&/J &n jfafil 33 son <ThM &l*fcft

U)frr4*-9 Q tftA&^i&K Vndnrr^ S2a~ /)/g*o ~f~£7*/ So AH ^

O&ulJ) &. V7 A&*rMs*£f /V^y^ fee*/?J &7iJ ~72 /&~SU U^cJkk. -^fhr jQotHc&y &C"p\e. Texts Qana-rfbtfr^ /ffLhiii 

### fU-chftps'



### £&$£* k-*vf/55 —77,?fbuMf- &£-> J&rMttbf g£a Ckusz.f 7% ^I5ti/u+/s>- d(L Js/)cop &AftCLT*a ^7^£?usnJs/: ///s W,ilcnf 

# -This <hu4 ^stnXsttdb&-TZ*as /fad a^ffind 0~i "T?^s a.% ^r Ofrm.^fe*«Jfi?e. 

### yf^c^'f'^ rrt

6-2-

## ~73Utfs &#k 1^/sUfu^ 7?x*<> dtt46^'7faku>< ^ ^siuiuiM^ is -a*. A«ifaJ<j c*r>£***J *f<m a cWr iy ^

QMstMtrt^ PfKdt i/Wi^^i <^^ #*'« a/A#? CauAi? § to fiX.&t**]* Whew* G'glr* *** M^k/j \)uJf***T: * 

### <f>cf (LauaT (^l&K^&iMf fad lOfr\U/L Qf^n^f, \ 

## £A>X /&*/>?&«**^ cm-fh* <&5t/7f**$*yjiiAjprlA*JddOtwhtg** (iXfrJ U)aJ/m (hb^n^i sr) -ihtjfifa&tfli$^ty3&\J4n*A** ft*® UM/)£« ^^d'jdUJ h^^tf danskbitfrr^ prK&Tkj Qi^\^Aa/ Afru)^ &£ 7%Anf<> And d'ESs/tms a<T Oeujc/s> 

### (& S&k&sU^t Shd Ojbm/A+IUW*M d*«*± hoick 4^ |x«t TtOd 72/^S ^ <&«*/ ^e^ (/£/?* T>7 ^c( dW^ CH'6.'icf) fetoAtr/** S*6^<gh kJkjck 6>]oacL.Thi/Lrtb
<2$S S

### ^^lSD.lh''t*s&<$*£>*>Q)l<*y Has H44*mp*J Timdbc J/Zajn 2.pii> 1i><rp*U»~'7h££ti fec<s£c/& ty',// s^dx) ~r7ifJ' % //a4s7)/y *~~2>><=J'P'* ^o^/hi "pTs-tAkLt /Uf«.i /Serf fr/m^ ^ 

### goscLne-T i& A^P-fpn.zy a/6/zPhoo/u^J -pi -?-*-><. Oas&, ^

/h>c/ IvAs /&*>** /ptTS&fi/fsL Uj,-kntssf£~*fi**7 u)££^ , ^ nuns aUwFAf^'rF; ?/"7^5 fr*£?~^'l-/'r?f(fef*~ \



### A&ftjfr £*4/-l2p> 'K3**e'/T*jfrlXbMf,/ rff. 7h-f ~T?iiK.\-r5 4- d>Hfs/ia^. (2emc?K-ntn<^ -ft* &%£/ q<P 

### fiffl*-*\ $£*-+*{*. m*U6<r, 7f /s /» fr\&H*£_ uji/nr* To JstfJso fi tf/Zd/tO. 0u>;M*«/' ^/a-Ux-kry jQi-tfa*// ^ /& .5^/<£ 

### ^ £us*A too ifit ^rfj<jfp '€/p^ $aa/ 

### •An on3m Zn-fctjeJ pit/to*/ /3»-rtaAyfy~/s Uo,J, A?J) //Uf\- O&uttt &k4*/l$ /y \jaiJ Sue*'gwjwW s< qtJff. -. O7^^ o^cT"

### feU-Lft r&*VS ^^.T^ir //jrxa«4l/r (2&CX-J'trfAtpZ&ls 2* OncfJeS /J/3 bdAtt <*& ,fl)fir7\JiwKis- /h -tfos ?-> Ttf? g

^ rY\/4'il "72 <^f -&£*$t &s/*tci 0&<cz.f J* 4p*&U 3dI

.*X-~7trs J</^2W«<ff/d<J&«loetL


### {pf^fo£$~~W -K

v- \o ^ *•**_ j*"" ft /^, r>;'- ( Is--' i/i v f— «w \- y d >- -T-^ N /N
"I" U V^ C M^ N p ,!*>.; •'

•0 3 O -JO - (^

.3 <n
u; O CM I'M f'j 0 

### <3*>-i

\£2 0- \| C=> •< \i » <s \\ -^ ^

\ b 1 fc UJ i-" •i v C3 X wl i O r-'| St

,i-^ 1 **«s*
#### Marcella G. POUNDS v. NEW YORK FIRE & MARINE UNDERWRITERS, INC., et al.

No. 7309.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

April 8, 1968.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1968.

Edward B. Dufreche, Ponchatoula, for plaintiff, Marcella G. Pounds.

Robert L. Kleinpeter, Baton Rouge, for defendants, C. J. Dufreche, Intercities Bus Line, Inc., and New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc.

Before LOTTINGER, ELLIS, and CUTRER, JJ.

*68ELLIS, Judge.

This case is consolidated with the case of Cooper v. Hargreve, No. 7308, 210 So.2d 64 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1968), decided by us this day.

For the reasons therein assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs to be shared equally by the parties.

Affirmed.
#### Robert L. LANDERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1387.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1973.

Robert L. Landers, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
#### HOWLAND v. STRAHAN.

No. 38476.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 28, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 219 So.2d 472.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard N. Feist
III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

March 13, 2007


/s/ Howard N. Feist III
-----------------------
Howard N. Feist III
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Nathan I. GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. Barbara C. GOLDSMITH, Appellee.

No. 70-872.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Felton WILLIAMS v. Ross MAGGIO, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 61109.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Felton Williams applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ refused.
#### Jack J. DeGRACE and Grace DeGrace, his wife, Appellants, v. Robert F. CROMWELL, John L. Remsen and Thomas H. Johnson, a co-partnership doing business under the name and style of Cromwell, Remsen & Johnson, Attorneys at Law, and Norman Higgins and Dale Harrington, doing business under the name and style of Higgins Plastering, Appellees.

No. 445.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 10, 1967.

Elton H. Schwarz, Stuart, for appellants.

John R. Beranek, of Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster, W¿st Palm Beach, for appellees Cromwell, Remsen and Johnson.

James S. Robinson, West Palm Beach, for appellees Higgins and Harrington.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Jack J. DeGrace et ux., appeal an order dismissing without leave to amend their second amended complaint for slander of title to real property by the defendants, Robert F. Cromwell et al.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argu*43ment of counsel for the parties. From such consideration we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., ANDREWS, J., and SAMPLE, WALLACE, Associate Judge,, concur.
259 La. 995

#### William P. RYAN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 51801.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1971.

In re: William P. Ryan applying for writ of haebas corpus.

Writ granted. See order.

The petition of relator in the above entitled and numbered cause having been duly considered,

It is ordered that this case be remanded to the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Section F, for the amendment of sentence, on or before December 6, 1971, giving credit for eleven (11) months time served from June 19, 1966 to May 19, 1967, or that the said Judge show cause to the contrary in this Court on December 16, 1971 at 11:00 a. m.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1298 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1298

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust the limits on 
           expensing of certain depreciable business assets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 16 (legislative day, July 15), 2013

  Mr. Begich introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust the limits on 
           expensing of certain depreciable business assets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPENSING CERTAIN DEPRECIABLE BUSINESS ASSETS.

    (a) In General.--Section 179(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(C), by striking ``$25,000'' and 
        inserting ``$250,000'', and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``$200,000'' and 
        inserting ``$800,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
From: Donley, Charles F. To: Hedberg, Brian (OST) ; Wellington, George (OST) Cc: Finamore, Robert (OST) Subject: Volaris Exemption Application Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 11:25:40 AM Attachments: volaris.pdf
Brian/George, I am writing to confirm that we have completed the polling on the attached Volaris exemption application. There are no comments and no objections. Thanks.
Best regards.

Charlie

From: Donley, Charles F. Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 10:59 AM To: 'sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com'; 'sametta.c.barnett@delta.com'; 'jeff.morgan@delta.com'; 'dan.weiss@coair.com'; 'steve.morrissey@united.com'; 'efaberman@wrf.com'; Sinick, Marshall S.; 'howard_kass@usairways.com'; 'benjamin.slocum@usairways.com'; 'jhill@dowlohnes.com'; 'mlbenge@zsrlaw.com'; 'dkirstein@yklaw.com'; 'carl.nelson@aa.com'; 'pmurphy@lopmurphy.com'; 'pmurphy@ggh-airlaw.com' Cc: 'Brian.Hedberg@dot.gov'; George.Wellington@dot.gov Subject: POLLING: Volaris Exemption ApplicationAttached please find Volaris' application for an exemption to serve AguascalientesChicago, Monterrey-Las Vegas, Morelia-Oakland, Toluca-Chicago and ZacatecasOakland. This is not an extrabilateral application. Please let me know if you have any comment. Thanks.

Charlie

--------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system; you must not copy or disclose the contents of this message or any attachment to any other person. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (US) LLP is part of the international legal practice Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, which operates worldwide through a number of separate legal entities. Please visit www.ssd.com for more information.

#SSDUS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
crge_ex102.htm

EXHIBIT 10.2
  
  
 	 
	1
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	2
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	3
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	4
#### Haywood OLIVER and John H. Striggles, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-25.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 8, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 11020.

#### The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. *v.*Sweet & Summers.

Decided October 12, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Huron county.

*Mr. F. A. Durban*and *Mr. Robert J. King,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. C. R. Summers,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                             (Shares in Thousands)
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       Three Months
                                                                                      Ended March 31,
                                                                                      ---------------
                                                                                  1996               1997
                                                                                  ----               ----
<S>                                                                            <C>               <C>
Average number of shares outstanding  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        248,923            250,096

Average shares issuable on exercise of stock
    options less shares repurchasable from proceeds   . . . . . . . . . .            928                890
                                                                                 -------           --------

Total average number of common and common
    equivalent shares   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        249,851            250,986
                                                                                 =======            =======



Net income (millions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        $  59.2            $ 117.2
                                                                                 =======            =======


Earnings per share  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        $  0.24            $  0.47
                                                                                 =======            =======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Randall J.
Fagundo, the Chief Executive Officer of American Coin Merchandising, Inc. (the
"Company"), and W. John Cash, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that, to the best of his respective knowledge:

1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
     2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
     "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     and Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
     period covered by the Periodic Report and results of Operations of the
     Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: August 14, 2002


/s/ Randall J. Fagundo                         /s/ W. John Cash
--------------------------------               --------------------------------
Randall J. Fagundo                             W. John Cash
Chief Executive Officer                        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.4

                         AMENDMENT TO WARRANT AGREEMENT

         This Amendment to Warrant Agreement (the "Agreement") is made as of
APRIL 6, 2001 by and between Silicon Valley Bank ("Holder") and GIGA INFORMATION
GROUP, INC. ("Company").

                                    RECITALS

         A. Company and Holder are parties to a Warrant to Purchase Stock, dated
MAY 25, 2000, together with all schedules and exhibits thereto (the "Warrant
Agreement").

         B. Company has agreed to modify the Initial Exercise Price as defined
in the Warrant Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         1. THE INITIAL EXERCISE PRICE IS $1.50 PER SHARE

         2. LEGAL EFFECT; INTERPRETATION. This Agreement amends certain terms of
the Warrant Agreement. Company confirms that, except as amended by this
Agreement, the Warrant Agreement remain in full force and effect. Unless
otherwise defined, all terms capitalized in this Agreement shall have the
meanings assigned in the Warrant Agreement. This Agreement, together with the
Warrant Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect
to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior agreements and
negotiations.

         3. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

         4. TIME OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for the performance of all
obligations set forth in this Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of
the date first written above.

COMPANY:                                                HOLDER:

GIGA INFORMATION GROUP, INC.                            SILICON VALLEY BANK

By: /s/ V.M. LYNCH                                      By: /s/ MIKE FIELD
    -------------------------------------                   ------------------
Name:  Victoria M. Lynch                                Name: Mike Field
Title: Vice President & Corporate                       Title: SVP
       Controller
#### Melvina THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-65.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 25, 1971.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full considera- • *641tion, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### In the Interest of Russell GIANGROSSO, Lonnie Gros, and Scott Hood.

No. 62393.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Russell Giangrosso, Lonnie Gros and Scott Hood applying for writ of certio-rari. Parish of Ascension.

Writ denied.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 20, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 20, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0183. CARTERSVILLE CITY SCHOOLS, et al. v. CELIA JOHNSON.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2016CV1118
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11314 Summary Calendar

JIMMY L. WILLIAMS

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

STATE WIDE CLAIM SERVICE; FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; MICHELLE DENISE PRICE: PHILLIP HERNANDEZ, Fort Worth Transportation Authority

,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CV

- 734

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Jimmy L. Williams, Texas pri s oner # 01904141 appeals the dismissal of

his civil negligence action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Willi a ms alleged that , prior to his incarceration, he suffered injuries while he was a
passenger on a bus that was involved in a traffic accident.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 31, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11314 Document: 00514217610 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2017No. 16

- 11314

2 The burden is on Williams to show federal jurisdiction. See Stafford v.
Mobil Oil Corp ., 945 F.2d 803, 804 (5th Cir . 1991 ). He alleges diversity
jurisdiction, but there is no diversity between Willi a ms and any of the
defendants, because all of the parti es are citizens of Texas. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1332 ; Owen Equip. and Erect. Co. v. Kroger , 437 U.S. 365, 373 (1978) (noti ng that § 1332 requires complete diversity of citizenship)

. Neither W ill i a ms nor
the record shows any other ba sis for federal subjec t matter jurisdiction.
Accordingly the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS . 5 TH C IR

. R

. 42.2. Williams’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED

. Case: 16-11314 Document: 00514217610 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>




  
<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000315256
<NAME>PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                1,722,572
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 27,274
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                     342,520
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   744,793
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,837,159
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  423,713
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                        170,501
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             594,215
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       75,000
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       516,485
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>              170,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                   25,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                799,450
<LEASES-CURRENT>                           122,363
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             534,646
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>            2,837,159
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                1,108,459
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                        88,841
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 877,985
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 964,435
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                    144,024
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           2,071
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>             143,704
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    51,532
<NET-INCOME>                                92,172
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 11,925
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               80,247
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    85,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   51,259
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                     232,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00