alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Kenneth W. Edic, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American CoinMerchandising, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and to the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004       By: /s/ KENNETH W. EDIC       Kenneth W. Edic   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          76,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  831,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,947)
<INVENTORY>                                    154,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,401,566
<PP&E>                                       3,741,709
<DEPRECIATION>                               (822,798)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,090,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,615,523
<BONDS>                                        845,124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,717,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,090,656
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,876,356
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,291,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (5,694)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                231,114
<INCOME-TAX>                                    61,967
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            169,147
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   169,147
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Lewis BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1-301.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

April 4, 1967.

Lewis Brown, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ON MOTION TO QUASH

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the court on the State’s motion to quash this appeal on the *33grounds that it is frivolous. We have examined the record and appellant’s brief filed with the court, and it appears from such examination that the appeal is successive, frivolous, and without merit.

The appellee’s motion to quash is granted, and the appeal herein is dismissed.

WIGGINTQN, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification

of

PSB Holdings, Inc.

under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the Company) certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date:  May 14, 2007



PETER W. KNITT

Peter W. Knitt

President and CEO





SCOTT M. CATTANACH

Scott M. Cattanach

Treasurer

(Chief Financial Officer)
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 05-15-00485-CR OFFENSE: 10.03

Cleveland Nixon v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Dallas

II5S-/5

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: Criminal District Court No. 6

DATE: 08/04/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-1121243-X

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Cleveland Nixon v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

&PP£LLA>JT*< Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: fl_

JUDGE:

CCA#: »/s$-;g

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Lt)Jllfar\ Mis*) M\^^ (hud o£ Apf&ds

~fe t^&ik^f ofTarn, I

o

*% ' A 3v /<? /^y^ 4*^ #//** &/J^:'>>* / ^>

^ >^?^*5 CfApvs de£*r*t <2»u*L<f0-£ Ap^h tftuy.

DotJ/ *^P*. a^«« •*»</ ^Ju/03£*»'<: J/jrr* ##_ £>i?<y/gifjg Oa&U]

Zjl g*R*k //askTM. jrv„ //^»$ o^ ^ fl<J,s^t7,z

IP^ 4/ti CWW c^/y (oPrt 7^? i^4/i6 8^; ^/4iW

asttpfUrK. S./htA-VTzAAs 431 ^vazX 44% &fa T$x <!;D An/f1W

n ^*f+>*£*•*? . f* n Hppxals -teem 71e Uj^lh/c

*"&* t T«o^, ^ July A> 3*0 /^, oCl / ^^

IV' <5<T<^
Oklwn CJW'S SUl*4 "That's w^v* ~js*_ ^w -r^/*/ '

1^-7»t (kuucf tfHSn -Px pteJZ&ifJ Timi fe*bJ*?f* %

^TX -Th* d&u*-1 dm frfdf/er*- Ji" //*& y#7» ( /fad /trfsf^y \ (Mlcnn Cmotc uM* 1&/J &n jfafil 33 son <ThM &l*fcft

U)frr4*-9 Q tftA&^i&K Vndnrr^ S2a~ /)/g*o ~f~£7*/ So AH ^

O&ulJ) &. V7 A&*rMs*£f /V^y^ fee*/?J &7iJ ~72 /&~SU

U^cJkk. -^fhr jQotHc&y &C"p\e. Texts Qana-rfbtfr^ /ffLhiii

fU-chftps'

£&$£* k-*vf/55 —77,? fbuMf- &£-> J&rMttbf g£a Ckusz.f 7%

^I5ti/u+/s>- d(L Js/)cop &AftCLT*a ^7^£? usnJs/: ///s W,ilcnf

-This <hu4 ^stnXsttdb&-TZ*as /fad a^ffind 0~i "T?^s a.% ^r Ofrm.^f e*«Jfi?e.

yf^c^'f'^

rrt

6-2-
~73Utfs &#k 1^/sUfu^ 7?x*<> dtt46^'7faku>< ^

^siuiuiM^ is -a*. A«ifaJ<j c*r>£***J *f<m a cWr iy ^

QMstMtrt^ PfKdt i/Wi^^i <^^ #*'« a/A#? CauAi? §

to fiX.&t**]* Whew* G'glr* *** M^k/j \)uJf***T: *

<f>cf (LauaT (^l&K^&iMf fad lOfr\U/L Qf^n^f, \

£A>X /&*/>? &«**^ cm-fh* <&5t/7f**$*yjii Ajprl A*J ddOtwhtg**

(iXfrJ U)aJ/m (hb^n^i sr) -ihtjfifa&t fli$^ty3&\J4n*A** ft*® UM/)£«

^^d'jdUJ h^^tf dans kbitfrr^ prK&Tkj Qi^\^Aa/ Afru)^ &£

7%Anf<> And d'ESs/tms a<T Oeujc/s>

(& S&k&sU^t Shd Ojbm/A+I UW*M d*«*± hoick 4^

|x«t TtOd 72/^S ^ <&«*/ ^e^ (/£/?* T>7 ^c( dW^

CH'6.'icf) fetoAtr/** S*6^<gh kJkjck 6>]oacL.Thi/Lrtb

<2$S S
^^lSD.lh''t*s &<$*£>*> Q)l<*y Has H44*mp*J Timdbc

J/Zajn 2.pii> 1i><rp*U»~'7h££ti fec<s£c/& ty',// s^dx) ~r7ifJ' %

//a4s7)/y *~~2>><=J'P'* ^o^/hi "pTs-tAkLt /Uf«.i /Serf fr/m^ ^

goscLne-T i& A^P-fpn.zy a/6/ zPhoo/u^J -pi -?-*-><. Oas&, ^

/h>c/ IvAs /&*>** /ptTS&fi/fsL Uj,-kntssf£~*fi**7 u)££^ ,^

nuns aUwFAf^'rF; ?/"7^5 fr*£?~^'l-/'r?f(fef*~ \

A&ftjfr £*4/-l2p> 'K3**e'/T* jfrlXbMf,/ rff.

7h-f ~T?iiK.\-r5 4- d>Hfs/ia^. (2emc?K-ntn<^ -ft* &%£/ q<P fiffl*-*\ $£*-+*{*. m*U6<r, 7f /s /» fr\&H*£_ uji/nr*

To JstfJso

fi tf/Zd/tO. 0u>;M*«/' ^/a-Ux-kry jQi-tfa*// ^ /& .5^/<£ ^ £us*A too ifit ^rfj< jfp '€/p^ $aa/

•An on3m Zn-fctjeJ pit/to*/ /3»-rtaAyfy~/s Uo,J, A?J) //Uf\-

O&uttt &k4*/l$ /y \jaiJ Sue*'gwjwW s< qtJff. -.

O7^ ^ o^cT"
feU-Lft r&*VS ^^.T^ir //jrxa«4l/r (2&CX-J'trf AtpZ&ls 2*

OncfJeS /J/3 bdAtt <*& ,fl)fir7\JiwKis- /h -tfos ?-> Ttf? g

^

rY\/4'il "72 <^f -&£*$t &s/*tc i 0&<cz.f J* 4p*&U 3d I

.*X-~7trs J</ ^2W «<ff/d<J&« loetL

{pf^fo£$~~
W

-K

v- \o ^ *•**_

j*"" ft r>;'- /^, ( Is--' i/i v f— «w \-

y d >-

-T-^ N /N

"I" U

V^ C M^ N

p

,!*>.; •'

•0

3

O

-JO - (^

.3

<n

u;

O

CM

I'M

f'j

0

<3*>-i

\£2 0- \|

C=> •< \i »

<s \\

-^

\

^

b 1 fc UJ i-" •i v C3

X wl i O r-'| St

,i-^ 1

**«s*
-  HIPAA for Professionals 
-  Regulatory Initiatives 
-  Privacy      -  Summary of the Privacy Rule 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Combined Text of All Rules 
  -  HIPAA Related Links 
-  Security      -  Summary of the Security Rule 
  -  Security Guidance  
  -  Cyber Security Guidance 
-  Breach Notification      -  Breach Reporting 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  Regulation History 
-  Compliance & Enforcement      -  Enforcement Rule 
  -  Enforcement Process 
  -  Enforcement Data 
  -  Resolution Agreements 
  -  Case Examples 
  -  Audit 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  State Attorneys General 
-  Special Topics      -  HIPAA and Part 2 
  -  Change Healthcare Cybersecurity Incident FAQs 
  -  HIPAA and COVID-19 
  -  HIPAA and Reproductive Health        -  HIPAA and Final Rule Notice 
  -  HIPAA and Telehealth 
  -  HIPAA and FERPA 
  -  Research 
  -  Public Health 
  -  Emergency Response 
  -  Health Information Technology 
  -  Health Apps 
-  Patient Safety      -  Statute & Rule        -  PSQIA Statute 
    -  Patient Safety Rule 
  -  Enforcement 
  -  Guidance 
-  Covered Entities & Business Associates      -  Business Associate Contracts 
  -  Business Associates 
-  Training & Resources 
-  FAQs for Professionals 
-  Other Administrative Simplification Rules 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# Numbers at a Glance

(As of August 31, 2012)

**Topics on this page:**
                          - Status of All Privacy Rule Complaints
                          - Total Investigated Resolutions
                          - Investigated Resolutions

----

* Referrals to DOJ - 502

Back to Top

----

 

Back to Top

----

Back to Top	 

Content last reviewed October 21, 2015
No. 11936.

#### Herning *v.*The State of Ohio.

Decided November 9, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Tuscarawas county.

*Mr. J. G. Patrick,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. B. Stevens*and *Mr. W. H. Phillips,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 31.4
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULE 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mobile Storage Group, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 e)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;f)
    
    Not applicable
 g)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 h)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 c)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 d)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/  Allan VillegasChief Financial Officer
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  Second Quarter 2003 and 2004




                                    Second     Second     Standard    Standard
Area                                quarter    quarter    error on    error on
                                     2003       2004     2004 rate  difference

United States.....................      68.0       69.2        0.1         0.2

  Inside MAs......................      66.2       67.4        0.2         0.2
   In central cities..............      52.0       52.9        0.3         0.4
   Not in central cities (suburbs)      74.6       76.1        0.2         0.3
  Outside MAs.....................      75.9       77.2        0.3         0.4

 Northeast........................      64.2       65.4        0.4         0.5
 Midwest..........................      72.8       74.2        0.3         0.4
 South............................      69.9       70.9        0.2         0.3
 West.............................      63.2       64.5        0.3         0.5
#### David Clarke HARNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1077.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 5, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50342

Summary Calendar

 

JOSEPH LOUIS TOVAR ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

JOSEPH LOUIS TOVAR; ANDREA DE LA CRUZ; LEO SALAS,

Plaintiffs-Counter Defendants-Appellants,

LUIS R. VERA, JR.; MICHAEL D. BERNARD,

Appellants,

versus

STEVEN C. HILBIG ET AL.,

Defendants,

STEVEN C. HILBIG; BEXAR COUNTY,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-95-CV-384

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joseph Louis Tovar, Andrea de la Cruz, and Leo Salas have

appealed the grant of summary judgment dismissing their action 
No. 98-50342

-2-

seeking civil rights and other relief against Bexar County,

Texas, and its Criminal District Attorney, Steven C. Hilbig. 

Appellants have not appealed the judgments dismissing their

claims against the other 11 defendants. Attorneys Luis R. Vera,

Jr., and Michael D. Bernard appeal the district court’s

imposition of sanctions against them, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

11. The appellants’ brief does not address the bases for the

district court’s rejection of their claims. No error is

identified. The appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Appellees’ request for their attorneys’ fees to be assessed

against appellants, on grounds that the appeal is frivolous, is

DENIED. Appellees have not filed a separate motion therefor,

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; RULE 38 DAMAGES DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 23**

Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
| The Board of Directors and Shareholders |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Countrywide Financial Corporation:      |   |   |

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-131707;333-131707-01; 333-131707-02; 333-131707-03; 333-114270, 333-114270-01, 333-114270-02;333-114270-03; 333-72484; 333-06473)on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-136401; 333-118363; 333-112994; 333-107649;333-106560; 333-73089; 333-75990; 333-47096; 333-47128; 333-87417; 333-66095;333-08638; 33-69498; and 33-17271) on Form S-8 of Countrywide FinancialCorporation of our reports dated February 28, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Countrywide Financial Corporation as of December31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, changesin shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and all relatedfinancial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006, Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Countrywide Financial Corporation. Our report on the aforementionedfinancial statements and schedules refers to the adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (asamended); SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, anamendment of SFAS No. 140 and SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for DefinedBenefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.
| /s/ KPMG LLP           |   |   |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| LosAngeles, California |   |   |
| February 28, 2007      |   |   |

 

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 20, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 6, 2006 |  | /s/ Stephen V. Coffey  
|                        |  | Stephen V. Coffey      
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich
Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2262

In Re: CHARLES A. RIPPY, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition.

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 19, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles A. Rippy, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charles A. Rippy, Jr., a North Carolina prisoner, petitions for a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition. He challenges his criminal conviction and seeks the appointment of a new attorney and DNA testing. We deny the petition. A writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition are drastic remedies to be used only in extraordinary circumstances.

See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) (writ of mandamus); In re Vargas , 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir. 1983) (writ of prohibition). Relief under these writs is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted. In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). The party seeking relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has “no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and that his right to such relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Rippy has not made such a showing. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED