alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
          United States:  Second Quarter 1996                     
                                                                 
(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)
                                                                     
                                    Second Quarter 1996             
                                                                   
                                                 Standard    Percent
          Type                                   error on    Distri-
                                    Estimate     estimate     bution
                                                                   
All housing units.................   114,207         238        100
                                                                   
  Occupied........................   101,082         246         89
    Owner occupied................    66,147         240         58
    Renter occupied...............    34,935         197         31
                                                                   
  Vacant..........................    13,125         130         11
    Year-round vacant.............     9,949         114          9
      For rent....................     2,975          64          3
      For sale only...............       997          37          1
      Rented or sold,                                             
      awaiting occupancy..........       894          35          1
      Held off market.............     5,083          83          4
        For occasional use........     1,678          48          1
        Temporarily occupied                                       
        by persons with                                            
        usual residence elsewhere.       883          35          1
        For other reasons.........     2,522          59          2
                                                                  
    Seasonal vacant...............     3,176          66          3

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CountrywideFinancial Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Eric P. Sieracki, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Eric P. Sieracki    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Eric P. Sieracki        |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| February 21, 2006       |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CountrywideFinancial Corporation and will be retained by Countrywide Financial Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                                  NOVELL, INC.
 
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
     The computation of common and common share equivalents is as follows (in
thousands):
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                                                                ---------------------------------------
                                                                OCTOBER 29,   OCTOBER 28,   OCTOBER 26,
                                                                   1994          1995          1996
                                                                -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                                             <C>           <C>           <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding*.........    361,648       367,963       355,478
Number of common share equivalents resulting from stock
  options, computed using the treasury stock method*..........      6,684         6,621         2,441
                                                                  -------       -------       -------
Number of common and common share equivalents used in
  computation*................................................    368,332       374,584       357,919
                                                                  =======       =======       =======
</TABLE>
 
---------------
* All share amounts reflect the June 1994 merger with WordPerfect Corporation.
 
                                       17
No. 11062.

#### Mathias *v.*Arnoldi.

Decided October 19, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Putnam county.

*Messrs. Watts & Moore,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Bailey & Le asure*and *Messrs. Straman & Straman,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Spear and Si-iauck, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
302 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 I, Wayne
F. Irmiter, certify that:
 
 1.
    
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Salton Sea Funding
      Corporation;2.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;3.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;4.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Date: May
6, 2005
 
 /s/
Wayne F. Irmiter
 Wayne F.
Irmiter
 Vice
President and Controller
 (chief
accounting officer)
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-50859

Summary Calendar

CHARLES CADDELL, Individually

and on behalf of his mother, Mildred Caddell,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(MO-96-CV-82)

April 9, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Charles Caddell had a shirt t aken off his back in an Odessa

Wal-Mart store when he was detained as a shoplifting suspect. He

appeals from a jury verdict that found Wal-Mart was not liable for

conversion of the shirt. He also appeals the district court’s

grant of a partial summary judgment dismissing his claims on behalf

of his deceased mother under the theories of negligent infliction

of emotional distress and bystander recovery and the denial of his

motion for a new trial based upon jury misconduct and newly2

discovered evidence.

We have carefully reviewed the record and considered the

briefs of the parties. There was sufficient evidence presented

that a reasonable juror could find that the Baja shirt alleged to

have been shoplifted was not owned by Cad dell and thus was not

converted by Wal-Mart. See Pagan v. Shoney’s, Inc. , 931 F.2d 334,

337 (5th Cir. 1991).

Further, the district court did not err in dismissing claims

brought on behalf of Mildred Caddell. Texas law does not recognize

n egligent infliction of emotional distress as a cause of acti on.

Nor did the court err in finding that no dispute of material fact

existed that she did not witness a serious or fatal accident and in

dismissing her bystander recovery claim.

Whether a new trial should be granted because of alleged jury

misconduct is left to the sound discretion of the trial court and

must be decided on an ad hoc basis. V ezina v. Theriot Marine

Service, Inc.

, 554 F.2d 654 (5th Cir. 1977). In a review of the

hearing conducted on the motion for a new trial, we find no abuse

of discretion in the denial of that motion.

Accordingly, the decisions of the district court are AFFIRMED.
#### Andrew D. HITCHCOCK, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc., Respondent.

No. 74-115.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 4, 1974.

Habeas Corpus denied.
Charge 2

Test System Elements & Conditions

Kenneth Portier

FIFRA SAP

March 6-7, 2012
Design Issues

• Specify a level of confidence for all label 

claims.

• Require both positive (known pesticide) and 

negative (untreated) controls for most studies.

• In dose response studies, there should be at 

least one dose above and one dose below the 

dose target (LD90) and/or one time above and 

one time below the time target (LT90).
Analysis Issues

• Use model-based inference

• Choose analysis model based on goodness-offit assessment.

• Limit the models that should be examined for 

the standard analysis.
Other Issues

• Be consistent in phrase use – “concentration 

response” or “dose response”.
Charge 3

Resistance Ratio Estimation

Kenneth Portier

FIFRA SAP

March 6-7, 2012
Example of importance of uncertainty 

in selection of the discriminating dose

Field Population LD90 Lower 95% Bound Upper 95% Bound

1 0.05 0.04 0.07

2 0.06 0.03 0.10

3 0.07 0.03 0.08
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10484]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “Miraculous Encounters: Pontormo from Drawing to Painting,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Morgan Library & Museum, New York, New York, from on or about September 7, 2018, until on or about January 6, 2019, at The J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Center, Los Angeles, California, from on or about February 5, 2019, until on or about April 28, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-11 of July 27, 2018.                

Jennifer Z. Galt,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-16659 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.0

                             COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in Thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Year Ended December 31,
                                               -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    1998            1997           1996                1995             1994
                                                  ---------      ----------     -----------        -----------       --------- 
<S>                                               <C>            <C>            <C>                <C>               <C>      
Interest Expense                                  $ 101,900      $   90,400     $   142,100        $   151,000       $  73,300

Estimated Interest Portion of
Rent Expense (One-Third)                             12,352          10,864          10,035             10,064          10,321
                                                  ---------      ----------     -----------        -----------       --------- 
Fixed Charges                                     $ 114,252      $  101,264     $   152,135        $   161,064       $  83,621
                                                  =========      ==========     ===========        ===========       =========
Income From Continuing
   Operations Before Income Taxes                 $ 523,600      $  483,200     $   470,700        $   297,300       $ 314,600

Add:      Fixed Charges                             114,252         101,264         152,135            161,064          83,621

          Dividends From Less Than             
          50% Owned Companies                             -               -             287                968             549

Less:     Equity in (Earnings) Losses of Less
          Than 50% Owned Companies
                                                        595            (320)         (1,609)              (996)         (1,776)
                                                  ---------      ----------     -----------        -----------       ---------
Earnings Before Fixed Charges                     $ 638,447      $  584,144     $   621,513        $   458,336       $ 396,994
                                                  =========      ==========     ===========        ===========       =========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                      5.6x            5.8x            4.1x               2.8x            4.7x
</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

1D2022-0312

_____________________________

REMYFORD RESTORATION 

SERVICES, LLC dba APEX 

DISASTER SPECIALISTS, a Florida 

Limited Liability Company,

Appellant,

v.

FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL 

FLORIDA, INC., a Florida 

Corporation; SCOTT 

WHITTERMORE, an individual; 

GORDON BREEN, an individual; 

WILL MIXON, an individual; 

TAMMY KIMBLE, an individual; 

CONTRACTOR CONNECTION 

GROUP, LLC, dba RESTORE-ONE, 

a Florida LLC, COASTAL ELITE,

LLC, dba RESTORE-ONE, a 

Florida LLC, PJ JOHNSTON, an 

individual; BROWN INSURANCE 

SERVICES, LLC, a Florida LLC; 

ROBBY L. TALLENT, an 

individual; JOHN W. HANCOCK, 

an individual; LONG BEACH 

RESORT COMMUNITY 

ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida 

not-for-profit corporation; BAY 

POINT RESIDENCES 

ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida 

not-for-profit corporation,
2

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Judge.

January 18, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, M.K. THOMAS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Ciera L. Lipps, Kovar Law Group, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Scott D. Stevens, Starnes Davis Florie LLP, Mobile, Alabama, for 

Appellees Bay Point Residences Association, Inc., and Reflections 

Owners Association, Inc.

Peter Harutunian and Forrest L. Andrews, Lydecker LLP, Miami, 

for Appellees Brown Insurance Services, LLC, Robby Tallent, and 

John Hancock.

Mark D. Davis, Clark Partington, Santa Rosa Beach, for Appellees, 

Contractor Connection, LLC d/b/a Restore-One and P.J. Johnston.

Diane M. Longoria and Frank C. Bozeman, III, Quintairos, Prieto, 

Wood & Boyer, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellee Long Beach Resort 

Community Association, Inc.
3

Steven B. Bauman and Kyle S. Bauman, Anchors Smith Grimsley, 

Fort Walton Beach, for Appellees FirstService Residential Florida, 

Inc., Will Mixon, Gordon Breen, Scott Whittemore, and Tammy 

Kimble.
From: Adam Olsen [ mailto:aolsen@sconsetstrategies.com ]

Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 4:33 PM

To: Exparte Communications

Cc: Bruce Carnevale; Mark Taylor ; Armstrong, Ashley

Subject: Bradford White Corporation Ex Parte Memo re: 3

- 24

- 15 Meeting



### A DAM 

### S. O LSEN 

### | S CONSET 

### S TRATEGIES

(202) 400

- 2543 | AOLSEN @ SCONSETSTRATEGIES

. COM

1720 E YE S TREET

, NW; S UITE 400; W ASHINGTON

, DC 20006

T HE T RUMP B UILDING

- 40 W ALL S TREET ; 38 TH F LOOR ; N EW Y ORK

, NY 10005

WWW .S CONSET S TRATEGIES

. COM
889 A.2d 416

#### Heidi BEILIS v. AMERICAN RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A.

No. 108,

Sept. Term, 2005.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Jan. 9, 2006.

Mark D. Gately, Mark S. Saudek, and Michael J. O’Connor of Hogan and Hartson L.L.P., Baltimore, for appellant.

George A. Nilson, Russell H. Gardner, and Linda M. Boyd of DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP, Baltimore, for appellee.

Submitted before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.

*499PER CURIAM ORDER.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case, it is this 9th day of January, 2006,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the case be, and it is hereby, remanded to the Court of Special Appeals with directions to dissolve the injunction previously issued by that Court and to dismiss the appeal as moot. Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by the appellant, Heidi Beilis.
#### Otto DAVIS and Virginia Davis, Petitioners, v. Richard BLANKENSHIP and Jimmie Lou Blankenship, Respondents.

No. 41583.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 6, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 15, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 251 So.2d 141.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.