alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL STEVENSON VIANDS, a/k/a Mike, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CR-00-57; CA-03-42-3) Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 1, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Stevenson Viands, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Stevenson Viands, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Viands has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Viands’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
#### William MARKHAM, as Tax Assessor of Broward County, Appellant, v. James H. McHALE and Alan C. Kauffman, Receivers, The Queen Ltd., Appellees.

No. 71-200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 24, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### NATIONAL BOAT MARTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. REGAL MARINE INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-549.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 6, 1972.

PER' CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard A. Wisot, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transpro, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 18, 2004                                  /s/ Richard A. Wisot
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Richard A. Wisot
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       22
```
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Third Quarter 2002 and 2001

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     Third quarter 2002
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       9.1        8.3       11.9
      For rent............................       2.8        2.9        2.5
      For sale only.......................       1.0        1.0        1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.7        0.7        0.7
      Held off market.....................       4.5        3.7        7.4
        For occasional use................       1.5        1.2        2.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.1        1.7        3.8

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.6        7.7

    Occupied..............................      88.0       90.1       80.4



                                                     Third quarter 2001
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       9.0        8.2       11.8
      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.3
      For sale only.......................       1.2        1.1        1.5
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.8        0.8
      Held off market.....................       4.4        3.7        7.1
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.3        2.7
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.0        1.6        3.6

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.6        7.8

    Occupied..............................      88.2       90.2       80.5
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 145 (Friday, July 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16240]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Temporary Emergency Committee of the Board of Governors; Sunshine 
Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, August 8, 2018, at 9:00 a.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    Wednesday, August 8, 2018, at 9:00 a.m.
    1. Financial Matters.
    2. Strategic Items.
    3. Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items and 
Temporary Emergency Committee governance.
    General Counsel Certification: The General Counsel of the United 
States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed 
under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Michael J. Elston, Acting 
Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, 
Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16240 Filed 7-25-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:

           First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

1997.....    65.4     65.7     66.0     65.7
1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2

1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4

\r Revised.
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  First Quarter 1998 and 1997

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                     First quarter 1998
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.9        8.3       10.9
      For rent............................       2.5        2.7        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.0        1.0        1.2
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.7        0.8        0.6
      Held off market.....................       4.6        3.9        7.0
        For occasional use................       1.5        1.1        2.7
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.9
        For other reasons.................       2.3        2.0        3.4

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.8        1.6        7.5

    Occupied..............................      88.3       90.1       81.6



                                                     First quarter 1997
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.7        8.2       10.5
      For rent............................       2.5        2.6        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.0        1.0        1.2
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.7        0.7        0.6
      Held off market.....................       4.5        3.9        6.5
        For occasional use................       1.5        1.2        2.7
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.2        1.9        3.1

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.6        7.6

    Occupied..............................      88.4       90.2       81.9
Exhibit 10.27.1

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                 CONGOLEUM CORPORATION 1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                           FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

      The Congoleum Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan For Non-Employee
Directors (the "Plan") is hereby amended in accordance with the attached
resolutions, as follows:

1.    Section 5 of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following new
      paragraphs (d) and (e) thereto, as follows:

            (d) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 5, the
            annual grant to eligible non-employee members of the Board of a
            Nonqualified Stock Option to purchase 1,000 shares of Stock
            originally scheduled to be made on July 1, 2002 shall not be granted
            on that date and, instead, shall be automatically granted to each
            then eligible non-employee member of the Board upon the date on
            which the Company grants replacement options to option holders (the
            "Replacement Grant Date") participating in the Company's offer to
            exchange outstanding options which commenced on December 4, 2001
            (the "Exchange").

            (e) Subject to the terms and conditions of the Exchange, upon the
            Replacement Grant Date, there shall be an automatic grant of
            replacement options under the Plan to then eligible non-employee
            members of the Board in exchange for each option previously granted
            under the Plan to such non-employee members that were, pursuant to
            and in accordance with the Exchange, tendered by them and accepted
            for exchange and canceled by the Company. The replacement options
            shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Exchange.

This Amendment to the Plan shall not be effective unless and until the Company
shall cancel any options previously granted under the Plan which were, pursuant
to and in accordance with the Exchange, tendered by an eligible non-employee
member of the Board and accepted for exchange by the Company. If such actions do
not occur, this Amendment shall be null and void and of no force or effect.
October 27, 2014 BYFACSIMILE Mr. Paul Gretch Director Office des transports du Canada

Office ofInternationalAviation U.S. Department ofTransportation X40, suite 6402 400 7th Street S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Mr. Gretch Reference: OST2006-24269 Canadian Transportation Agency
M4820-U5-19

This letter confirms that the Canadian Transportation Agency considers applications by United States air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Canada, including charters between Canada and third countries, in accordance with the provisions ofthe AirTransport Agreementbetween Canada and the United States ofAmerica, signed March 12, 2007 (Agreement). In addition, as established in the Agreement, charterservices not specified in the Annex to that Agreement, are considered on the basis ofcomity and reciprocity.

M nager International Agreements

ruce Christie, ANA arc Rioux, ACEA. rian Hedberg, US DoT
Ottawa (Ontario) K1A ON9 www.otc.gc.ca Ottawa Ontario K1A ON9 www.cta.gc.ca 

# Canada
chances for promotion 

good. 

Connecticut, chairman 

committee of the las

mentioned for tho place

Sintering of Shipwrec

St. John's, N. P., 

schooner Mattio Collins 

and was lost on Harbo

crow managed to got ,o

tho sea was making a cl

it. Thoy (Kcured rop

themselves to the rock 

spent the night. Th

effected in the morning

great difficulty, each ono 

pulled through tho wate

to a boat.

, l)e "W

Paius, July 8. Tho st

lished that Count Ferd

whose health has b

long timo, has suddenly 

Much anxioty is felt reg

dition.

Death of a Well Kno

San Francisco, Jul

Drew Barrymore, the w

ress, died suddenly at 

yesterday. Sho had be

Jong time.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40960

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCO ANTONIO GARCIA-ESPARANZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-286-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marco Antonio

Garcia-Esparanza (Garcia) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garcia has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 17, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40960 Document: 00511205632 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LS POWER FUNDING CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,473
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 338,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,794
<BONDS>                                        329,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           1
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   338,473
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,472
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Richard A. Wisot, the chief
financial officer of Proliance International, Inc. (the "issuer"), does hereby
certify that the report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the
"report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Richard A. Wisot
-------------------------------------
Richard A. Wisot
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (chief financial officer)
Proliance International, Inc.
May 15, 2007
```
No. 11098.

#### The Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. *v.*The Village of Kent.

Decided October 5, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Portage county.

*Messrs. Rogers, Rowley & Rockzvell*and *Mr. A. S. Cole,*for plaintiff in error.

*487*Mr. C. H.*Curtiss, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Spear and Spiauck, JJ., concur.