alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03200

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03200\03200_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03200\03200_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03200\03200_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03200\03200_PART A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03200\03200_PART B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03200\03200_PART C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03200\03200_PART D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03200\03200_PART E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03200\03200_PART F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03200\03200_PART G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03200\03200_PART H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03200\Certification Statement Plant ID_03200.pdf Plant certification statement

03200\Supporting Documentation\03200_A5-2 Aerial Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03200\Supporting Documentation\03200_A5-3 Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03200\Supporting Documentation\03200_D3-1 (WWT-1).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03200\Supporting Documentation\03200_F5-6 (Well Map).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03200\Supporting Documentation\D3-1 (Pond-1).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Cox
Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I,
James O. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                           /s/ James O. Robbins
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Name: James O. Robbins
                                           Title: President and Chief Executive
                                           Officer
                                           Date: February 27, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other
documentation authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cox
Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Cox Communications, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification "accompanies" the annual report on Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cox Communications,
Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the annual
report on Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,841
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             517
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   903
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     30,781
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         132,950
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           131,538
<LOANS>                                        322,805
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,318
<DEPOSITS>                                     329,516
<SHORT-TERM>                                    77,128
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,541
<LONG-TERM>                                     44,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 505,318
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,144
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,105
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   574
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,823
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,562 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,926
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,335
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      460
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (58)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,605
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,066
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,066
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.16
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,171
<LOANS-PAST>                                       116
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   780
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,343
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,412
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,353     
<RECOVERIES>                                       296
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,827
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,827
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,226
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
February 28, 1999 consolidated financial statements] and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           4,676
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,582
<PP&E>                                         147,058
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,942
<OTHER-SE>                                    (153,424)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,899
<SALES>                                        197,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,508
<CGS>                                           67,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               165,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (39,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (39,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (39,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.0)


</TABLE>
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  Fourth Quarter 1999 and 1998




                                    Fourth     Fourth     Standard    Standard
Area                                quarter    quarter    error on    error on
                                     1999       1998     1999 rate  difference

United States.....................      66.9       66.4        0.2         0.3

  Inside MAs......................      64.8       64.4        0.2         0.3
   In central cities..............      50.9       50.3        0.3         0.5
   Not in central cities (suburbs)      73.3       73.3        0.2         0.3
  Outside MAs.....................      75.8       74.8        0.4         0.5

 Northeast........................      63.2       62.0        0.5         0.6
 Midwest..........................      72.5       71.5        0.4         0.5
 South............................      69.1       69.0        0.3         0.4
 West.............................      60.6       60.4        0.4         0.5
#### George BAIER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43965.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied, 277 So.2d 856.

CARLTON, C. J„ and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### COLLINS v. ZACK CO.

No. 35902.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellant, v. William M. BATTEN and Frances Z. Batten, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 2591.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 3, I960.

Michael Melvin and Robert Dyer of Van den Berg, Gay, Burke & Dyer, Orlando, for appellant.

Julian K. Dominick, of Fishhack, Davis, Dominick, Troutman & Salfi, Orlando, for appellees Batten.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Cheshire v. State Road Department, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 790.

Affirmed.

McCAIN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT CONSULTING SERVICES
AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into on this 17th day of October 2022 (“Effective
Date”), by and between Veris Residential, Inc. (“Veris” or the “Company”), having offices at Harborside
3, 210 Hudson Street, Suite 400, Jersey City, N.J. 07311 and Gary T. Wagner, an independent consultant, having an office at 11917
SW Poseidon Way, Port St. Lucie, FL 34987 (“Consultant”).


 


WHEREAS, Veris and Consultant
entered into an Independent Consulting Services Agreement effective April 16, 2022 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, by its terms, the
Agreement ends on October 16, 2022; and


 


WHEREAS, Veris and Consultant
wish to extend the Term of the Agreement;


 


NOW THEREFORE, In consideration
of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Amendment, and intending to be legally bound, Veris and Consultant agree as follows:


 


		1.	Term.



 


Consultant shall continue to perform the Consulting
Services, as described in the Agreement, through November 16, 2022 (“Extended Term”), unless the Agreement is
otherwise terminated pursuant to its terms. Upon the conclusion of the Extended Term, the Agreement may, upon the mutual agreement of
Veris and Consultant, be renewed for successive thirty (30) day periods, each an Extended Term, subject to the same terms and conditions
as set forth in the Agreement.


 


		2.	Compensation.



 


As compensation for the Consulting Services to
be provided by Consultant during each Extended Term, at the conclusion of each Extended Term or the termination of the Agreement, if earlier,
Veris shall provide Consultant with a lump sum of $5,000.00 (“Consulting Fee”). Veris shall issue an IRS Form 1099 to
Consultant reflecting the Consulting Fee.


 


		3.	Remaining Terms and Conditions.



 


All other terms and conditions of the Agreement
not otherwise amended by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect during each Extended Term.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Amendment to be effective as of the Effective Date.


 


	CONSULTANT:	 	VERIS RESIDENTIAL, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Gary T. Wagner	 	By:	/s/ Taryn Fielder
	GARY T. WAGNER	 	 	Taryn Fielder

 Executive Vice President & General Counsel
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14


                          [DIEDRICH COFFEE LETTERHEAD]



                                                                   July 21, 1997

Mr. John B. Bayley
2144 Michelson Drive
Irvine, CA 92612

Dear John:

        On April 25, 1997, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the "Company") approved certain changes to your
compensation and employment status with the Company. If you are in agreement
with the changes set forth below, please sign a copy of this letter (the
"Letter") and return it to me.

        1. Effective April 28, 1997, you shall assume the position of Acting
Vice President of Finance and Controller of the Company.

        2. Effective May 1, 1997, your annual base salary shall be adjusted from
$75,000 to $85,000.

        3. Upon the specific achievement of criteria to be developed between you
and the Company, you shall be entitled to a "success bonus" in an amount up to
20% of your annual base salary. These criteria are to be developed in connection
with the rebudgeting process for fiscal 1998 that is currently underway. You
shall not be entitled to any bonus hereunder unless you and the Company's Chief
Executive Officer have agreed upon specific criteria that are set forth in
writing and you fulfill the requirements set forth in such document for
receiving the success bonus.

        4. Effective April 25, 1997, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company granted stock options to you pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the Diedrich Coffee, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and upon the
following additional terms and conditions. You are granted options to purchase
20,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $3.17 (the
average closing price of the Company's common stock reported on the NASDAQ
National Market for the period beginning 15 trading days prior to April 25, 1997
and ending 15 trading days after April 25, 1997) with the following vesting
schedule: 30% of the option shares vest on the first anniversary of the date of
grant, 30% of the option shares vest on the second anniversary of the date of
grant and 40% of the option shares vest on the third anniversary of the date of
grant. These options shall expire on April 24, 2007.

        Congratulations and I look forward to working with you to build Diedrich
Coffee into a thriving and profitable company.

                                            Sincerely,


                                    /s/  LAWRENCE GOELMAN
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Lawrence Goelman
                                    Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer

I have reviewed the foregoing and agree to be bound by the terms hereof:



/s/  JOHN B. BAYLEY                       2/23/97
--------------------------------        ------------------------
John B. Bayley                          Date
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of First Investors Financial Services, Inc., (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, TommyA. Moore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: Dec 12, 2005

 
|   | By: /s/ Tommy A.  Moore, Jr. |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Tommy A.  Moore, Jr.         |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer          |

 

----
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1560 

To allow certain emergency relief amounts to be made available to the Federal 

Highway Administration to use for disasters occurring in calendar year 2013. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and 

passed 

A BILL 

To allow certain emergency relief amounts to be made available to the Federal Highway Administration to use for 

disasters occurring in calendar year 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deficit Neutral Dis5 aster Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY RELIEF PROJECTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, the Secretary of Transportation may obligate 

9 not more than $450,000,000 of the amounts made availVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:50 Oct 01, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1560.CPS S1560

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1560 CPS

1 able to carry out section 125 of title 23, United States 

2 Code, under chapter 9 of title X of division A of the Dis3 aster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113– 

4 2; 127 Stat. 34) under the heading ‘‘EMERGENCY RELIEF

5 PROGRAM’’ under the heading ‘‘FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS’’ 

6 under the heading ‘‘FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRA7 TION’’ for emergency relief projects in the State of Colo8 rado arising from damage caused by flooding events in 

9 that State in calendar year 2013. 

10 (b) EMERGENCY DESIGNATION FOR CONGRESSIONAL

11 ENFORCEMENT.—In the Senate, this Act is designated as 

12 an emergency requirement pursuant to section 403(a) of 

13 S. Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the concurrent resolu14 tion on the budget for fiscal year 2010. 

15 (c) EMERGENCY DESIGNATION FOR STATUTORY

16 PAYGO.—This Act is designated as an emergency re17 quirement pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay18 As-You-Go Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–139; 2 U.S.C. 

19 933(g)). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Nathan James GRANT, alias v. STATE.

5 Div. 213.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 5, 1974.

Larkin Radney, Alexander City, and John P. Oliver, Dadeville, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and George M. Van Tassel, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellee.

CATES, Presiding Judge.

Second degree murder: sentence, twenty years in the penitentiary.

Rule A, 49 Ala.App. XXI has not been complied with.

The State’s case rests on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant’s flight— part way in the deceased’s car. See Cobern v. State, 273 Ala. 547, 142 So.2d 869.

Circumstantial evidence may afford the basis for a conviction in criminal cases. Ala.Dig. Criminal Law '®=^S63. In a homicide case we stated the principle in Payne v. State, 48 Ala.App. 401, 265 So.2d 185.

We have considered the entire record under Code 1940, T. 15, § 389, including the following:

> a) The clerk’s certificate;

> b) The court reporter’s certificate;

> c) The statement of the organization of the court (■ — but see Supreme Court Rule 52);

> d) The indictment (caption, charge, conclusions, and required endorsements) ;

> e) Judgment entry (arraignment, presence of counsel, empanelling of jury, verdict, adjudication of guilt, allocu-tus, sentence and notice of appeal) ; • and

> f) Each ruling of the trial judge adverse to the appellant, including without limitation the written charges refused appellant.

*382From this examination we conclude the judgment below should be

Affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
#### Ley H. SMITH, etc., Appellant, v. CERTIFIED HEATING & COOLING, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 30, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Richard H. Cooper, Judge (as to Amended Final Judgment) W. A. Ratti-shall, Judge (as to order granting Remitti-tur)

Appeal dismissed.
**United States**

**Departm ent of**  **Agriculture Forest** 

**Service White Mountain** 

**National Forest 71**  **White Mountain Drive Campton**  **, NH 032 23**  **Comm : (603)**  **536**
**- 6100**  **TTY: (603) 536** 
**- 3665** 

**Caring for the Land and Serving People**  Printed on Recycled Paper **File Code:** 2580

- 2 **Date:** Ju ly 23, 2010 James P. Brooks Director Bureau of Air Quality Maine Department of Environmental Protection 17 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333
Dear Mr Brooks: On May 27, 2010, the State of Maine submitted a draft State Implementation Plan (SIP) describing your proposal to improve regional haze impacts at mandatory Class I areas across your region. We appreciate the opportunity to work closely with your state through the initial evaluation, development, and, now, subsequ ent review of this plan. Cooperative efforts such as these ensure that, together, we will continue to make progress toward the Clean Air Act’s goal of natural visibility conditions at our Class I wilderness areas and parks. This letter acknowledges that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service has received and conducted a substantive review of your proposed Regional Haze SIP. Please note, however, that only the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can make a final determination about the document's completeness, and therefore, only the EPA has the ability to approve the document. The Forest Service's participation in Maine’s administrative process does not waive any legal defenses or sovereignty rights it ma y have under the laws of the United States, including the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations. From the perspective of a Federal Land Manager, I have enclosed the Department of Interior’s comments and I concur with their response. I look forward to your response r equired by 40 CFR 51.308(i)(3). For further information, please contact air quality specialist Ralph Perron at (802) 222

- 1444. Again, we appreciate the opportunity to work closely with the State of Maine. The Forest Service compliments you on your hard work and dedication to significant improvement in our nation's air quality values and visibility.
Sincerely,

/s/ Thomas G. Wagner THOMAS G. WAGNER Forest Supervisor Enclosure cc: Jeff Crawford Tom Downs Ralph Perron Scott CopelandThomas R Doan e

Charles E Sams Bret A Anderson