alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.   /s/Leon J. Olivier(Signature)Leon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHale(Signature)David R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date:  February 26, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
           Third Quarter 2006 and 2007

           (Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   Third Quarter 2006

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................     10.0       8.1       9.8      11.9       8.4
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.6       3.5       3.4       2.2
      For sale only......................      1.5       1.0       1.8       1.7       1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.9       0.8       1.0       0.9       0.9
      Held off market....................      4.5       3.7       3.6       5.8       4.0
        For occasional use...............      1.5       0.7       0.8       2.1       1.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.9       0.6       1.1       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.2       2.1       2.1       2.6       1.4

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.2       3.8       2.9       3.1       2.9

    Occupied.............................     86.9      88.0      87.3      84.9      88.7



                                                   Third Quarter 2007


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................     10.4       8.3       9.9      12.6       8.9
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.4       3.3       3.5       2.4
      For sale only......................      1.6       1.2       1.7       1.9       1.5
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      1.0       0.9       1.0       1.1       0.8
      Held off market....................      4.8       3.9       4.0       6.1       4.3
        For occasional use...............      1.5       0.9       0.8       2.1       1.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.8       0.7       0.9       0.9
        For other reasons................      2.4       2.1       2.5       3.1       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.6       4.1       3.0       3.8       3.3

    Occupied.............................     86.0      87.6      87.0      83.7      87.8
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  Fourth Quarter 1996 and 1995

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)

Fourth quarter 1996

                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      8.7       8.4       7.5       9.9       8.2
      For rent...........................      2.6       2.6       2.4       2.7       2.7
      For sale only......................      1.0       1.0       0.9       1.1       1.0
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.7       0.7       0.6       0.7       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.5       4.2       3.7       5.5       3.9
        For occasional use...............      1.5       1.3       0.6       2.2       1.6
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.8       0.8       0.7       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.2       2.1       2.2       2.6       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.9       3.8       2.6       2.9       2.3

    Occupied.............................     88.4      87.8      89.8      87.2      89.5


Fourth quarter 1995

                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      8.4       8.1       6.9       9.6       8.5
      For rent...........................      2.6       2.5       2.3       2.7       3.0
      For sale only......................      0.9       0.8       0.9       1.0       0.9
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.7       0.6       0.6       0.8       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.2       4.1       3.2       5.1       3.9
        For occasional use...............      1.5       1.2       0.6       2.0       1.7
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.7       0.7       0.6       0.7       0.7
        For other reasons................      2.0       2.1       2.0       2.4       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.7       3.3       2.5       2.9       2.2

    Occupied.............................     88.8      88.7      90.6      87.5      89.3
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

I, William J. Gervais, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Qualstar Corporation;
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this amendment does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this amendment; and
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amendment, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amendment.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 28, 2003/s/ William J. GervaisWilliam J. GervaisPrincipal Executive Officer
SSSA ea see pt ea Sa” Fo SES a ea a nase re er

? . DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS apne _/
Incorporated place — Warde diy USB POR EN aitimaieveminies = SIXTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1940
"Ge ity cen tere beac Won Jowsiction POPULATION SCHEDULE BPE.

Z ‘Oificrm af Paci end Mines ce Walch caizie are ma

—

WAME PERSONAL RESTDERCK, APurT 1, 1058

= rR L weet T
Mume of oxch person whose areal place fe cae be ee ere |
: | of residence 6 ‘Apri 1, 1040, was in tire fn Suey Seed peyote a
e this bousebol adhere ‘tee nso at wen.
3 | ox sues to ractona : peeps ia oat Sant talon cn a ae at i

1, Parerns Sempararily atunat fram Datamhalt.
eee "Ab aller mertew of see pawmra,

eu anda 1 paar f te. Wri “alua*
uli had et beam gore rw sass,

Toure 2) afer ra neo! perms tarsiabing lalermatha.

‘OCCPATION, INDGETEY, AND CLASS OF WORKER
a Eres emi

ee Siminsaeentee

fics Sates been 2 i
ae,
Piieaer
=

a

ule?

ce
sg

.

{eet

Es
cy
=
“care ot

a

dune
docs |
WG pers tae |

¢! Bamber of Fare beardeln

ee Seem :
places. “
D

t 19

me fee

i

ip

Sete
®,
: FE

Cc --—

:

fae
Sy

i

» Fa

CER SRP RR Eee
[oe a
io [9 jo 16

ih

¥

lo fs [is [Nis

SOS SE

r

yo | 191 0 ve womel
4) O\¢ You Hel Akeepe Ak

a
“
E

=

TRI
bh &

Ity

hla fale
Ee
|

a

MTA'A

NIG SIS SIS

7a
fy

Ze: eA i AAE

Y Iu jh

rF

F

bw Lael at a1) 7g pas bos ‘145 asta ree Poripoly

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Pig ogy? «i

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

oO

R

SUPPLEMENTARY
QUESTIONS | FOR FERGONS 14 YEARS OLD AND OVER

|

POR OFFICE USE ONLY—DO WOT WRITE IW THESE CoLUMES

ty Pa

ecavns Baumernted on Lu 5 eal 6 ‘TUUAL OCOMFATION, INUEWIEY, AHD CLA OF WORKER

St ees

ee cae aoe akontineneue

See

wm

i a

—

i WeNAt oooTPATION vaeAs Dab UerEr per Chane tks
| 7 =S

| 35

v
—  joolal2
| Oo joc | ols |

(Cte, Mont C. CLAS OF WORKER MOITART SEATROE:

Rg sky oere FE cc Wan,

" - ry @ Al eT
* aly Clara + ‘ 5 EEVET)
Laake? Wb Us I= os Sek :

Cal. & TAREE OF BORE, 7 OWRED:

Od A InGeeT 2. was

rune: Where swears hectabeldl amy> 4 IDGEIEY GRADE GP SCHOOL: (CL OTRSRNNNLY OF WHE OREMA — Cel, #. W481
srmBois hue eat . § a =, 20M oS =
4eD Hamactary sted, inte Mh grea 3, 9, ap =

murLexAront ® somes oon, a th ge HH, Sore

— C.04.0804 Sos ae es

A 8
jem

=
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 623,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        597,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   623,274
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    557
<INCOME-TAX>                                       228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       329
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Memorandum to File**

**Subject:** Meeting with CalPortland on Proposed Reasonable Progress FIP **From:** Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division **To:** File **Date:** March 26, 2014 **Participants** : **CalPortland :**  Jay Grady Director, Environmental Affairs , CalPortland

Bruce Shafer , Senior VP Cement Operations , CalPortland Wayne Nastri , Co

- President , E4 Strategic Solutions, Inc. Howard Berman , Co

- President , E4 Strategic Solution s, Inc.

**EPA:** Deborah Jordan, Director, Air Division, EPA Region 9

Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director , Air Division Eugene Chen, Engineer , Permits Office Shaheerah Kelly, Engineer, Permits Office Thomas Webb, Project Lead, Planning Office Charlotte Withey, Attorney

- Advisor, Office of Regional Coun sel

**Summary:** Representatives o f CalPortland went over their comments on the proposed FIP in advance of submittal. They went over several areas in EPA’s technical analysis where they asserted that EPA had made errors. Their overall position was that no controls should be required at Cal Portland because the visibility benefits are minimal. Their major points were:

 They did not want the option of an annual tonnage limit (cap) because it would limit production

.  They believed EPA had made errors in its modeling. CalPortland redid the modeli ng with revised inputs and planned to submit that as part of its comments. CalPortland asserted that a 50% control efficiency number was too high and EPA should

use a 35% control efficiency number because the kiln was a retrofit design.
 CalPortland planned to submit revised cost information with its formal comments
#### Carlie MATHIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1089.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 19, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
John McHugh is substituted for his predecessor, Francis J. Harvey, as *

Secretary of the Army, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent **

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. Accordingly Davenport’s request for oral argument is

denied.

IL/Research

07-55803

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT DAVENPORT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JOHN McHUGH, Secretary of the Army; *

et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 07-55803

D.C. No. CV-06-02669-H-CAB

MEMORANDUM **

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010***

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

FILED

MAR 31 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
IL/Research

2 07-55803

Robert Davenport, an attorney, appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his action seeking relief under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.

§ 552a, in connection with the Department of Defense’s refusal to change certain

factual findings set forth in a decision to revoke Davenport’s security clearance. 

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Dorfmont v. Brown, 913 F.2d

1399, 1400-01 (9th Cir. 1990), and we affirm in part, vacate in part and remand.

The district court properly dismissed Davenport’s action because it lacked

subject matter jurisdiction to review the factual findings underlying a decision to

revoke a security clearance. See id. at 1401-02.

Because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, Davenport’s

action should have been dismissed without prejudice. See Kelly v. Fleetwood

Enters., Inc., 377 F.3d 1034, 1036 (9th Cir. 2004). Accordingly we vacate the

judgment and remand for the limited purpose of entry of judgment dismissing the

action without prejudice.

We grant defendants’ requests to strike set forth in their answering brief.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part and REMANDED with

instructions.
#### Joseph A. FASONE, Appellant, v. Melvin L. REESE, City Manager of the City of Miami, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-593.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Frederick C. STOCK and his wife, Estelle F. Stock, Appellants, v. BILCON DEVELOPERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. *67-75.*

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 20, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 9, 1967.

*182John Montgomery Greene, Ocala, for appellants.

Arthur E. Roberts, Groveland, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, brought suit against defendant, Bilcon Developers, Inc., to recover on two promissory notes given by the defendant corporation to plaintiffs. Appellee corporation counterclaimed alleging misappropriation of corporate funds by appellant, Frederick C. Stock, for use and benefit of himself and his wife, Estelle F. Stock. The cause was heard before a referee who was mutually agreed upon by both parties. After an extensive hearing and a review by the trial judge, a final judgment was entered in favor of appellee corporation against appellants, Fred C. Stock and his wife, Estelle F. Stock, in the amount of $11,-398.05.

The appellants have appealed and assigned for our consideration the findings of fact on which the final judgment was based and the entry of the judgment against plaintiff, Estelle F. Stock.

The evidence was heard by a referee who made findings, all of which were reviewed by the trial judge. No reversible error has been demonstrated by the appellants, and upon an examination of the record we cannot hold that the trial court’s findings were erroneous.

Estelle Stock joined her husband in suing on the promissory notes. She was named as a counter-defendant in the ap-pellee’s counterclaim. She appeared at the trial and was called to testify. At no time did she question the trial court’s jurisdiction over her. Under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.11(h) (now Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.140, 30 F.S.A.) any defense Estelle Stock may have had concerning lack of jurisdiction over her person was waived, and she is now bound by the final judgment.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.
#### Charles O. DANISON and Sara K. Danison, his wife, Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and George S. Smith, Appellees.

No. 72-751.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 11, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: March 20, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: March 20, 2015 Meeting with Advanced Energy Economy Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** On March 20, 201 5 , Kevin Culligan of OAR and I met with Arvin Ganesan and Matt Stanberry of Advanced Energy

Economy to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan for existing power pl ants.
<Page>

              ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.3
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                               Twelve Months Ended
                             (Thousands of Dollars)

<Table>
<Caption>

                                                              December    December    December    December    December
                                                                1998        1999        2000        2001        2002
                                                             -----------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>

EARNINGS
        Net Income                                             $44,968    $14,726      $39,069     $40,182      $44,896
        Federal Income & State Tax                              24,877     40,101       24,654      25,937       24,574

        Total Earnings Before Federal and State Income Tax      69,845     54,827       63,723      66,119       69,470

FIXED CHARGES*                                                  36,973     35,454       27,141      26,373       30,118
                                                             -----------------------------------------------------------
                    Total Earnings Before Federal and State
                       Income Tax and Fixed Charges           $106,818    $90,281      $90,864     $92,492      $99,588
                                                             ===========================================================



        * Fixed Charges

        Interest on Long-Term Debt                              23,867     26,326       21,873      21,855       21,218
        Amortization of Debt Discount, Premium and Expense       1,138      1,208        1,060         994          961
        Interest Component on lease Payment                      2,505      2,583        1,257       1,305        1,598
        Other Interest                                           9,463      5,337        2,951       3,213        7,302
                                                             -----------------------------------------------------------

                    Total Fixed Charges                         36,973     35,454       27,141      27,367       31,079
                                                             ===========================================================



        Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                        2.89       2.55         3.35        3.38         3.20
                                                             ===========================================================
</Table>