alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Charge 2 

### Test System Elements & Conditions

Kenneth Portier
FIFRA SAP March 6

- 7, 2012

## Design Issues

• Specify a level of confidence for all label claims.

• Require both positive (known pesticide) and negative (untreated) controls for most studies.

• In dose response studies, there should be at least one dose above and one dose below the dose target (LD90) and/or one time above and one time below the time target (LT90).

## Analysis Issues

• Use model

- based inference

• Choose analysis model based on goodness

- of

fit assessment.

• Limit the models that should be examined for the standard analysis.

## Other Issues

• Be consistent in phrase use

– “concentration response” or “dose response”.

## Charge 3 

## Resistance Ratio Estimation

Kenneth Portier
FIFRA SAP March 6

- 7, 2012

### Example of importance of uncertainty in selection of the discriminating dose

Field Population LD90 Lower 95% Bound Upper 95% Bound 1 0.05 0.04 0.07 2 0.06 0.03 0.10 3 0.07 0.03 0.08
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-36208, 33-47891, 33-58872, 33-81994, 333-00877, 333-05077
and 333-21833) pertaining to the 1988 Stock Option Plan, 1995 Stock Option
Plan, 1995 Outside Directors Stock Plan, 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
certain stock option agreements issued in connection with the acquisition of
Virtual Machine Works, Inc. and certain individual employee stock option
agreements of IKOS Systems, Inc., of our report dated October 15, 1997, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of IKOS Systems,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September
27, 1997.
 
                                          Ernst & Young LLP
 
San Jose, California
December 15, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          9
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000

 <S>                                        <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
  <PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
  <CASH>                                          9,424
  <INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             75
  <FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   16
  <TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
  <INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    47,757
  <INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         13,232
  <INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           12,888
  <LOANS>                                       209,330
  <ALLOWANCE>                                     2,299
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                285,080
  <DEPOSITS>                                    221,981
  <SHORT-TERM>                                   14,822
  <LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,210
  <LONG-TERM>                                    25,000
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
  <PREFERRED>                                         0
  <COMMON>                                        1,805
  <OTHER-SE>                                     19,262
  <TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                285,080
  <INTEREST-LOAN>                                 8,433
  <INTEREST-INVEST>                               1,732
  <INTEREST-OTHER>                                   48
  <INTEREST-TOTAL>                               10,213
  <INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              4,407
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,564
  <INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           4,649
  <LOAN-LOSSES>                                     300
  <SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
  <EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 3,236
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,792
  <INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      1,792
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
  <CHANGES>                                           0
  <NET-INCOME>                                    1,253
  <EPS-BASIC>                                    1.44
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.44
  <YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.77
  <LOANS-NON>                                       640
  <LOANS-PAST>                                        0
  <LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
  <LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 1,155
  <ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                2,099
  <CHARGE-OFFS>                                     120
  <RECOVERIES>                                       20
  <ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               2,299
  <ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            2,299
  <ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
  <ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0


</TABLE>
No. 11786.

#### Griner *v.*The State of Ohio.

Decided October 5, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Messrs. Becker & Becker,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. B. F. Weíty,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. B. E. O’Connor,*assistant prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                      OF
                              PSB HOLDINGS, INC.
                UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
PSB Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

      Date: May 13, 2005

                                           DAVID K. KOPPERUD
                                           David K. Kopperud
                                           President and CEO


                                           SCOTT M. CATTANACH
                                           Scott M. Cattanach
                                           Treasurer
                                           (Chief Financial Officer)
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jesse Obendale ROBERTS, Appellee.

No. P-159.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 14, 1971.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Joanos, Parsons & Hayes, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State seeks reversal of the trial court’s order denying its motion for a change of venue.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein. Upon our consideration thereof, we are of the view that appellant has failed to demonstrate a palpable abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge, and the order denying the motion for change of venue is therefore affirmed. Singer v. State, 109 So.2d 7 (Fla.1959); Rhoden v. States, 179 So.2d 606 (Fla.App. 1st, 1965).

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM  THE
     CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF MIDWEST  EXPRESS HOLDINGS, INC. AS OF
     AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDING  MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY
     BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          20,328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                       154
<INVENTORY>                                      7,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,209
<PP&E>                                         305,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,580
<BONDS>                                          3,031
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           145
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,990
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,764
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (924)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,562)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       (4,713)
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,275)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.45)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      544
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,946
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,204
<SALES>                                            225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   512
<CGS>                                               95
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    100
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       100
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
#### James R. NESMITH et ux., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al., Respondents.

No. O-202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1971.

Richardson, Canada, Henry & Munroe, Tallahassee, for petitioners.

Howard Hadley and Geoffrey B. Dob-son, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied. Canal Authority v. Litzel, Case No. 39,469 in the records of the Florida Supreme Court, opinion filed December 16, 1970, 243 So.2d 135.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.61


 


Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.


4955 Directors
Place


San Diego,
CA 92121


 


October 17, 2022


 


Scilex Holding Company


960 San Antonio Road

Palo Alto, CA 94303


Attn: Jaisim Shah


Its: CEO


 


Re: Certain Loan Commitments


 


Reference is made to that certain (a) Contribution
and Satisfaction of Indebtedness Agreement (the “Debt Exchange Agreement”), entered into as of September 12, 2022,
by and among Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Sorrento”), Scilex Holding Company, a direct wholly
owned subsidiary of Sorrento (“Scilex”), and Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Sorrento
and direct wholly owned subsidiary of Scilex; and (b) Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), entered
into as of March 17, 2022 (as amended), by and among Vickers Vantage Corp. I, a Cayman Islands exempted company (which shall migrate to
and domesticate as a Delaware corporation, “Vickers”), Vantage Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of Vickers, and Scilex. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms
in the Debt Exchange Agreement.


 


Sorrento
and Scilex hereby acknowledge and agree that, upon the written request of Scilex (which request Scilex shall make to the extent necessary
to satisfy the condition set forth in Section 8.3(i) of the Merger Agreement), Sorrento shall fund one or more loans to Scilex in the
amount set forth in such written request (a “Loan Request”); provided, that any amounts funded by Sorrento in respect
of any Loan Request shall be treated as Outstanding Indebtedness for all purposes under the Debt Exchange Agreement and included in the
calculation of the Aggregate Outstanding Amount thereunder. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, in no event shall the aggregate
amount of loans made and funded by Sorrento pursuant to Loan Requests exceed the lesser of (a) $10,000,000 and (b) an amount that, when
taken together with all other Outstanding Indebtedness, will result in the Aggregate Outstanding Amount equaling $310,000,000.


 


This letter agreement shall automatically terminate
without any further action by any party upon the earlier of (a) the Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement) and (b) the termination
of the Debt Exchange Agreement or Merger Agreement in accordance with their respective terms, and this letter agreement shall be of no
force and effect from and after any such termination.


 


[Signature Page to Follow]


 



     


     


    

 


	Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Henry Ji,
    Ph.D.	 
	Name: Henry Ji, Ph.D.	 
	Its: CEO	 




 


	 	Scilex Holding Company
	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/ Jaisim Shah
	 	Name: Jaisim Shah
	 	Its: CEO




 


[Signature Page to Letter
Agreement Re: Certain Loan Commitments]
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE PROBATE COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COU NTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 18th day of November, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

In re: The Estate of Carolyn C. Hardesty, Deceased No. 06

- 13

- 00048

- CV

Trial Court No. 2010

- PR01500

- 2

- A

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 5th day of February , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 164 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                         Calendar No. 8
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 164

 To prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to 
               Pakistan until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2013

 Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                            January 29, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to 
               Pakistan until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO PAKISTAN.

    The United States may not obligate or expend any direct financial 
assistance to the Government of Pakistan unless the President certifies 
to Congress that--
            (1) Dr. Shakil Afridi has been released from prison in 
        Pakistan;
            (2) any criminal charges brought against Dr. Afridi, 
        including treason, have been dropped; and
            (3) Dr. Afridi has been allowed to leave Pakistan, if such 
        departure is necessary to ensure his freedom.
                                                         Calendar No. 8

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 164

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to 
               Pakistan until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 29, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WENDELL GRAVES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 104 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Fourth Quarter:  2006 and 2007
          (in percent)
                                    90-percent
                    Fourth    Fourth  confidence    90-percent confidence
Age of householder Quarter  Quarter interval(&plusmn;)a  interval (&plusmn;)a
                    2006     2007   of 2007 rate  of difference

United States.....    68.9     67.8      0.5           0.4

    Under 25 years    25.7     24.9      1.5           1.4
    25 to 29 years    41.8     39.4      1.4           1.4
    30 to 34 years    55.8     53.9      1.4           1.4
    35 to 39 years    66.5     64.3      1.3           1.2
    40 to 44 years    71.1     70.1      1.2           1.2
    45 to 49 years    75.3     73.7      1.1           1.2
    50 to 54 years    77.6     76.7      1.1           1.2
    55 to 59 years    79.9     79.4      0.8           0.9
    60 to 64 years    81.6     81.5      0.9           0.9
    65 to 69 years    82.7     80.9      1.4           1.2
    70 to 74 years    83.6     82.5      1.6           1.3
    75 years and over 79.3     78.8      1.1           1.0

    Under 35 years    42.8     41.0      0.9           0.8
    35 to 44 years    68.9     67.2      0.9           0.8
    45 to 54 years    76.4     75.1      0.8           0.8
    55 to 64 years    80.7     80.4      0.6           0.6
    65 years and over 81.2     80.3      0.8           0.7
    
    
aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliablilty.  
The larger the confidence interval is, in relation to the size of the estimate,
the less reliable the estimate.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1187 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1187

   To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on forgiven 
                          mortgage loan debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2013

 Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Mr. Heller, Mr. Menendez, and Mr. Isakson) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on forgiven 
                          mortgage loan debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF DISCHARGE OF 
              QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 108(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 
2014'' and inserting ``January 1, 2016''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to indebtedness discharged after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```