alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
\-e-ie\Y Vac<f^-V i^v^'oo? 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

. •r.viTMDrior— 

>VvS-^ORTATICN 

.-::: T OPERATIONS 

C 2 ^ A q: Li 1 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Tuesday, December 20, 2011 8:36 AM 

'Thomas Adams' 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

RE: Brainerd, MN Airport 

Order2009-8-10.pdf 

Dear Mayor Adams^ 

Thanks, for your email. I will place your' comments in Brainerd's EAS Docket, #2011-0135, 

which you can access on Regulations.gov. If you wish, I can assist you in accessing that 

docket --my direct line is below. 

Regarding the issue of capacity for Brainerd, Order 2011-11-30 selected Great Lakes to 

provide 24 nonstop round trips per week to Brainerd with 19-seat aircraft. I have attached 

above a recent order where the same issues you have raised were discussed -- Order 2009-8-10. 

As discussed in that order, the maximum capacity we can guarantee any community under the EAS 

program is 67 seats per day. Great Lakes proposes to provide 76 seats, and we have selected 

that option. We only selected four round trips per day, 76 seats being more than 67, because 

we cannot select a portion of an aircraft. 

Regarding the issue of baggage flow through, I note that Delta Airlines has indicated it will 

be working very closely with Great Lakes for a seamless service transition on that and other 

matters. 

Finally, I note that Brainerd Airport is 114 miles from the l^inneapolis airport, the shortest 

distance of any of the l^innesota/Iowa communities where Delta notice. While Great Lakes 19-

seaters do not have many of the important passenger features afforded by Saab 340 or regional 

jets, it is a common rule in the airline industry that the closer an airport to a hub, the 

more important is the frequency of air service provided. The simple reason is that the 

biggest competitor is the highway and the private automobile. With only two round trips per 

day provided with a 50-seat regional jet or 34-seat Saab 340, the most we could subsidize, 

many prospective passengers from Brainerd and surrounding communities would choose to drive. 

As such, I am hopeful that Great Lakes' service will better meet the needs of the community 

than the less frequent service it is replacing, and hopefully reduce the level of subsidy 

required to support air service at Brainerd when the current rate expires in two years and we 

need to again request proposals. 

Best Regards, 

Kevin Adams 

202-366-1047 

Original Message 

From: Thomas Adams rmailtorthadamsiSuslink.netl 

Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 11:45 PM 

To: Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Subject: Brainerd, MN Airport 

Dear Mr. Adams,
#### Ivory Joe MOBLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43253.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 5, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 270 So.2d 29.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Dulovich, Joseph R." <JDulovich@rrienergy.com>

Date: 7/21/2010 12:39 PM

Subject: Re: RRI New Castle Request for Extension

Attachments: pic08326.gif; New Castle Extension Request Letter 7-2-10.doc

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the RRI Energy New Castle Plant. The

deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 of the completed

questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the

deadline for Part G is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of

the questionnaire.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic08326.gif)

 

 From: "Dulovich, Joseph R." <JDulovich@rrienergy.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Frank, Stephen" 

<SFrank@rrienergy.com>, "Whelan, Kerry

 M." <KWhelan@rrienergy.com> 

 

 Date: 07/02/2010 12:39 PM 

 Subject: RRI New Castle Request for Extension 

Please find attached a request for an extension for submitting the ICR

data.

Sincerely,

Joe Dulovich

RRI Energy New Castle Plant(See attached file: New Castle Extension

Request Letter 7-2-10.doc)
Transport Transports Canada Canada TP 7245E



# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your na me. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued b y the Continuin g Airworthiness Division ( AARDG ) , National Aircraft Certification Branch, Trans p ort Canada, Ottawa, tele p hone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communicat ions Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1-800-305-2059 , or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ addr ess.asp
2 4-0022 ( 01-2005 ) 1/1 No

. CF-2011-21 Issue Date 12 July 2011

Number: CF-2011-21 Subject: Fuel System – Chafing of High Pressure Fuel Line
Effective: 28 July 2011 Applicability: Bombardier Inc. DHC-8 Aeroplan e Models 400, 401 and 402 Serial Numbers 4001, 4003 through 4354, and 4356 through 4363. Compliance: As indicated below, unless already accomplished. Background: During routine maintenance, an operator discovered evidence of chafing on a high pressure (HP) fuel line. The source of chaf ing was related to the improper installation of an expandable pin on the lower cowl assembly, which caused the lanyard to foul against the HP fuel line. This condition, if not co rrected, may cause fuel leakage in a fire zone. Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin ( SB) 84-71-13 to introduce spring clips to positively retain and control the lanyards, regar dless of the installati on orientation of the expandable pin to rectify this problem.
Corrective Actions: Within 6000 hours air time or 36 months afte r the effective date of this directive, whichever occurs first, install spring clips, reposition the lanyard attachment points and complete all required actions in acco rdance with Bombardier SB 84-71-13, dated 19 May 2011, or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada.

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities


### ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Derek Ferguson Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Contact: Mr. Robin Lau, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 613- 996-9178 or e-mail CAWWEBFeedback@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
SERVED: OCTOBER 23, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

PAZ AVIATION, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0807 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

1bis proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011S0190272) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J .E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

---~-··![2····-·-· --. ·~ ;··/·..--···. ~ 

····-. ·~ --· ~/~ Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Jud e _. / 

_ _.._ ........ --···:-·---··. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Paz Aviation Inc., Respondent 

c/o Jay Allen, President 

7455 W 2nd Court 

Hialeah, FL 33014-4301 

ONE COPY 

David M. McDonald, Respondent's Counsel 

McDonald & McDonald 

Attorneys at Law 

P.O. Box 669122-9428 

Miami, FL 33135-2321 

TEL: 305-643-5313 

FAX: 305-643-4990 

William Vines, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

·TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-2014-0807 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
#### Gus DUNCOMB, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1117.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1973.

Gus Duncomb, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty, Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
#### Irvine, Admx., *v.*Erie Railroad Co.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *debatable constitutional question involved.*

(No. 18479

Decided July 1, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Marion county.

*Messrs. Justice, Yourng S*Mouser, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. \Orissinger, Guthery & Strelitz*and *Messrs. Cook, McGowan, Foote, Bushnell é Burgess,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

          CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Richard A. Wisot, the
chief financial officer of Transpro, Inc. (the "issuer") does hereby certify
that the report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the "report")
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.



/s/ Richard A. Wisot
--------------------
Richard A. Wisot
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)
Transpro, Inc.
May 12, 2003


                                       19
#### Betty McCutcheon YOUNG, as administratrix of the Estate of Donald T. McCutcheon, Deceased, and Madeline McCutcheon, Petitioners, v. Steven M. SMILES et al., Respondents.

No. 43450.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 23, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 29, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 798.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### Veronica MITRISIN, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Andrew Mitrisin, Deceased, Appellant, v. Helen HILL et al., Appellees.

No. 72-729.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 11, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Amendment of By-Laws


                CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.

                                BOARD OF TRUSTEES

                                FEBRUARY 17, 2000



            The  Chairman of the Board stated that the next item of business was
a recommendation to amend the By-Laws of the Company.  The purpose for which the
amendment is proposed is as follows:

            Effective  February 17, 2000,  to increase from eleven to twelve the
number of Trustees  eligible to serve on the Board.  This action is  recommended
because Dr.  George  Campbell,  Jr. has accepted the  invitation of the Board of
Trustees  to  become a member,  commencing  with the  February  17,  2000  Board
meeting.

            After discussion, on motion, duly seconded and carried, it was
unanimously

            RESOLVED,  That,  effective February 17, 2000, the first sentence of
Section 8 of the By-Laws be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:

            "Section 8. The affairs of the  Company  shall be managed  under the
            direction of a Board  consisting  of twelve  Trustees,  who shall be
            elected annually by the stockholders by ballot and shall hold office
            until their successors are elected and qualified."
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 19, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: November 5, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen V. Coffey  
|                        |  |  |  | Stephen V. Coffey      
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich
Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Ollie DAILEY et al. v. ACME FINANCE CORP.

No. 45766.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 27, 1970.

R. W. Boydstun, Jr., Louisville, for appellants.

Fair & Mayo, Louisville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# 2016
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 6, 2001 (March 6, 2001 as to Note 18) appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Cox Communications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000,
in the following Registration Statements of Cox Communications, Inc. and to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                           Form                           File No.
                           ----                       -----------------
                           <S>                        <C>
                           S-8                          33-80993
                           S-8                          33-80995
                           S-8                          33-91506
                           S-8                          333-44399
                           S-8                          333-85055
                           S-8                          333-43738
                           S-3                          333-03766
                           S-3                          333-82575
                           S-3                          333-82575-01
                           S-3                          333-82575-02
                           S-3                          333-54450-01
</TABLE>


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 16, 2001
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 12

                      Williams Holdings of Delaware, Inc.
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (Dollars in millions)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Nine months ended
                                                                September 30, 1996
                                                                ------------------
<S>                                                                   <C>    
Earnings:
   Income from continuing operations before income taxes              $ 220.1
   Add:
      Interest expense - net                                             21.2
      Rental expense representative of interest factor                   10.6
      Other                                                                .7
                                                                      -------

         Total earnings as adjusted plus fixed charges                $ 252.6
                                                                      =======

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense - net                                             $  21.2
   Capitalized interest                                                   2.1
   Rental expense representative of interest factor                      10.6
                                                                      -------

         Total fixed charges                                          $  33.9
                                                                      =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                       7.45
                                                                      =======
</TABLE>
#### Dorothy MORWELL, Appellant, v. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 68-67.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 17, 1968.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 8, 1968.

Norman K. Rutkin and Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellant.

Sherouse & Corlett and Michael D. Sikes, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See All Florida Surety Company v. Coker, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 508, 510, and cases cited there.
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT #1 TO THE PROMISSORY
NOTE


ISSUED ON JUNE 7, 2022


 


THIS AMENDMENT
#1 to the Note (as defined below) (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of October 11, 2022 (the “Effective Date”),
by and between BETTER FOR YOU WELLNESS, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and MAST HILL FUND, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (the “Holder”) (collectively the “Parties”).


 


BACKGROUND


 


A. The
Company and Holder are the parties to that certain promissory note originally issued by the Company to the Holder on June 7, 2022, in
the original principal amount of $310,000.00 (as amended from time to time, the “Note”); and


 


B.
The Parties desire to amend the Note as set forth expressly below.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of
the execution and delivery of the Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1. Section
3.19 of the Note shall be replaced in the entirety with the following:


 


“3.19 Registration
Statement Failures. The Borrower fails to (i) file a registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) covering the
Holder’s resale at prevailing market prices (and not fixed prices) of all of the Conversion Shares (as defined in the Purchase Agreement)
(the “Conversion Shares”) and Commitment Shares (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) (the “Commitment Shares”)
on or before February 9, 2023, (ii) cause the Registration Statement to become effective on or before May 10, 2023, (iii) cause the Registration
Statement to remain effective until the Holder no longer owns the Note, Conversion Shares, or Commitment Shares, (iv) comply with the
provisions of the Registration Rights Agreement in all respects, or (v) immediately amend the Registration Statement or file a new Registration
Statement (and cause such Registration Statement to become effective as provided in the Registration Rights Agreement) if there are no
longer sufficient shares registered under the initial Registration Statement for the Holder’s resale at prevailing market prices
(and not fixed prices) of all of the Conversion Shares and Commitment Shares.


 


2. This
Amendment shall be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the Note.
Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the Note, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment,
shall remain in full force and effect.


 


[Signature page to follow]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties
hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 





	BETTER
    FOR YOU WELLNESS, INC.	 	MAST
    HILL FUND, L.P.
	 	 	 
	By:	/S/	 	By:
    	/S/
	Name:
    	Ian
    James	 	Name:
    	Patrick
    Hassani
	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer	 	Title:	Chief
    Investment Officer