alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012014EN.01000102.xml

| 17.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6400 — ECE/METRO/MEC JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 14/02

On 26 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6400. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6400. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
APSC Staff 4-18

Attachment 1

Page 1 of 1

Generating Unit MW In-Service SCR Type

Project Cost ($M) 

(1)(2)(3)

AMOS1 800 2004 SCR 140.1

AMOS2 800 2005 SCR 155.3

CONESVILLEV4 800 2009 SCR 45.4

MITCHELL1 800 2007 SCR

MITCHELL2 800 2007 SCR

MUSKINGUM RIVER5 600 2005 SCR 90.4

ZIMMER 1,300 2004 SCR 33.4

Total: 5,900

(1). Dollars are total cost including overheads and AFUDC.

AEP's 5,900 MW Installed SCR Controls

 Since 2004

 292.4

(2). Conesville 4 has joint ownership with Duke Energy and Dayton Power & Light (AEP 

Share - 43.47%) Cost shown is AEP only.

(3). Zimmer has Joint Ownership with Duke Energy and Dayton Power & Light (AEP 

Share - 25.4%) Cost shown is AEP only.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1594 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1594

  To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 East Pecan 
 Street in Sherman, Texas, as the Paul Brown United States Courthouse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2013

 Mr. Cruz (for himself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 East Pecan 
 Street in Sherman, Texas, as the Paul Brown United States Courthouse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 101 East Pecan Street in 
Sherman, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Paul Brown 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Paul Brown 
United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40027

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AURELIO MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:09-CR-750-2

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Aurelio Martinez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 17, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40027 Document: 00511206117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:    /s/ Robert S. Cubbin
    --------------------------

Robert S. Cubbin
Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1866 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1866

 To provide for an extension of the legislative authority of the Adams 
   Memorial Foundation to establish a commemorative work in honor of 
              former President John Adams and his legacy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 2013

Mr. Markey (for himself and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for an extension of the legislative authority of the Adams 
   Memorial Foundation to establish a commemorative work in honor of 
              former President John Adams and his legacy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR MEMORIAL 
              ESTABLISHMENT.

    Section 1(c) of Public Law 107-62, as amended by Public Law 111-
169, is amended by striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2020''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Newt V. MILLS v. Jerry A. ADAMS.

No. 61331.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Newt V. Mills, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Jackson. 352 So.2d 287.

Granted; appeal reinstated. See *Walker v. Jones.*

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., dissent from the granting of this writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 166 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 166

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
 River connecting St. Louis, Missouri and southwestern Illinois as the 
                    ``Stan Musial Memorial Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAN MUSIAL MEMORIAL BRIDGE.

    (a) Designation.--The new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the 
Mississippi River that connects St. Louis, Missouri to southwestern 
Illinois shall be known and designated as the ``Stan Musial Memorial 
Bridge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan 
Musial Memorial Bridge''.

            Passed the Senate March 11, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1798 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1798

 To ensure that emergency services volunteers are not counted as full-
 time employees under the shared responsibility requirements contained 
           in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2013

    Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Toomey, Mr. King, Ms. 
Collins, and Mr. Begich) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that emergency services volunteers are not counted as full-
 time employees under the shared responsibility requirements contained 
           in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Volunteer Firefighters 
and Emergency Responders Act''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY SERVICES VOLUNTEERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4980H(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Exception.--
                            ``(i) In general.--For purposes of this 
                        section, a qualified emergency services 
                        volunteer shall not be counted in determining 
                        the number of full-time employees who are 
                        employed by an employer.
                            ``(ii) Definition of qualified emergency 
                        services volunteer.--The term `qualified 
                        emergency services volunteer' means any bona 
                        fide volunteer, as defined by paragraph 
                        (11)(B)(i) of section 457(e) performing fire 
                        fighting and prevention services, emergency 
                        medical services, or ambulance services for an 
                        eligible employer, as defined by paragraph (1) 
                        of such section.''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section, or the 
amendment made by this section, shall be construed to modify the 
treatment of qualified emergency services volunteers (as defined in 
subparagraph (C) of section 4980H(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986, as added by subsection (a)) in any capacity other than the 
treatment of such volunteers under the shared responsibility provision 
for employers with respect to health coverage under the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Consolidated
Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and
for the period then ended.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas F. Farrell, II                                                
|Thomas F. Farrell, II President and Chief Executive
Officer March 6, 2006



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas N. Chewning                                                               
|Thomas N. Chewning Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer March 6,
2006
MEMORANDUM

TO: Portland Cement NESHAP Docket

FROM: Keith Barnett, USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

DATE: June 2, 2008

SUBJECT: Meeting on Portland Cement NESHAP

On June 2, 2008 a teleconference was held between representatives of the USEPA and 

several cement companies. The purpose of the call was to discuss issues related to the 

Portland Cement NESHAP

USEPA Representatives on calls:

Keith Barnett, USEPA

Mike Laney, RTI (EPA Contractor)

Steve Fruh

Steve Silverman

Cement Industry

Mike Pelan, Lafarge

Hector Ybanez, Holcim

Dan Nugent, Buzzi Unicem

Tim Matz, Lehigh

This was a general discussion of NESHAP issues including potential subcategorization 

schemes.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00414-CV

Whitney BREWSTER, in her capacity as Executive Director of the 

Texas Department of Motor Vehicles,

Appellant

v.

Drew ROICKI and Richard Roicki as Successors in Interest to Pinnacle Motors,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-06565

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. 

Costs of this appeal are taxed against the party that incurred them. 

SIGNED May 13, 2015.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
#### Larry Earl RAWLINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1054.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 23, 1972.

Philip J. Mandina, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of two counts of robbery. He was adjudicated and sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each count to run concurrently. The proof of guilt is clearly sufficient.

On this appeal, two points are presented. The first challenges the admission of certain evidence. The point is not well taken under the rule stated in Karl v. David Ritter, Sportservice, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 23. The second point is likewise unavailing because of the rule stated in State v. Melendez, Fla.1971, 244 So.2d 137.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph B. Leonard, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |     |  |                                     
|----------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|May 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Joseph B. Leonard               
|            |  |     |  | Joseph B. Leonard                   
|            |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11089.

#### Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Co. *v.*Williams et al.

Decided October 5, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Van Wert county.

*Mr. Charles A. Schmettau; Mr. George P. Greenhalgh*and *Mr. Clarence Brown,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr.*Lee *Elliott; Mr. O. A. Balyeat*and *Mr. FT. L. Conn,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Spear and Shauck, JJ., concur.
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Fourth Quarter 1997 and Fourth Quarter 1996



                                    Rental vacancy rates


                          Fourth       Fourth      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           1997         1996       1997 rate   difference


United States..........         7.7          7.7          0.2          0.3

  Inside MAs...........         7.5          7.6          0.2          0.3
    In central cities..         7.9          8.3          0.3          0.4
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         7.1          6.8          0.3          0.4
  Outside MAs..........         8.6          8.3          0.5          0.7

 Northeast.............         6.9          7.1          0.4          0.6
 Midwest...............         7.3          8.2          0.4          0.6
 South.................         9.3          8.5          0.3          0.5
 West..................         6.5          6.7          0.3          0.5



                                    Homeowner vacancy rates


                          Fourth       Fourth      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           1997         1996       1997 rate   difference


United States..........         1.7          1.7          0.1          0.1

  Inside MAs...........         1.6          1.7          0.1          0.1
    In central cities..         2.0          2.1          0.1          0.2
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         1.4          1.5          0.1          0.1
  Outside MAs..........         2.2          1.7          0.1          0.2

 Northeast.............         1.6          1.8          0.1          0.2
 Midwest...............         1.3          1.4          0.1          0.2
 South.................         2.1          1.8          0.1          0.1
 West..................         1.7          1.9          0.1          0.2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
of Citizens, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 I, Rick D. Riley, certify that: In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citizens, Inc. (the Company) for the
period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Rick D. Riley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Rick D. RileyName: Rick D. RileyTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 30, 2005
 111
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
               STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
              COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              ---------------------------
                                                               1998      1997      1996
                                                              -------   -------   -------
                                                                (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                                           <C>       <C>       <C>
Computation of Earnings:
  Income before income taxes and extraordinary item.........  $24,129   $18,844   $15,833
Add:
  Interest expense..........................................   60,303    57,603    50,159
                                                              -------   -------   -------
Earnings as adjusted........................................  $84,432   $76,447   $65,992
                                                              =======   =======   =======
Computation of Fixed Charges:(a)
  Interest expense (including amortization of debt
     expense)...............................................  $60,303   $57,603   $50,159
  Preferred stock dividends(b)..............................       --       163       669
                                                              -------   -------   -------
                                                              $60,303   $57,766   $50,828
                                                              =======   =======   =======
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred
  stock dividends...........................................     1.40x     1.32x     1.30x
                                                              =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
(a)  No portion of rental expense could be demonstrated to be representative of
     the interest factor, and therefore none is included in fixed charges.
(b)  Preferred stock dividends have been increased to an amount representing the
     pre-tax earnings which would be required to cover such dividend
     requirements.