alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
TRANSPRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,109
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,192
<INVENTORY>                                     73,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,325
<PP&E>                                          99,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,168
<BONDS>                                         58,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,179
<SALES>                                        127,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,423
<CGS>                                           94,861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   364
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (821)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,615
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,615
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Daniel E. CHENOWETH, Appellee.

No. 72-434.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 5, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 204 (Friday, October 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 72803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25533]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9029-7]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 10/10/2016 Through 10/14/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20160237, Final, USFS, FL, Beasley Pond Analysis Area, Review 
Period Ends: 12/05/2016, Contact: Branden Tolver 850-926-3561.
EIS No. 20160238, Final, NPS, NY, Fire Island National Seashore General 
Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 11/21/2016, Contact: Kaetlyn 
Jackson 631-687-4770.
EIS No. 20160239, Draft, USFS, OR, Ten Cent Community Wildfire 
Protection Project, Comment Period Ends: 12/05/2016, Contact: Andrew 
Stinchfield 541-427-5397.
EIS No. 20160240, Draft, BR, CA, Long-Term Plan to Protect Adult Salmon 
in the Lower Klamath River, Comment Period Ends: 12/05/2016, Contact: 
Julia Long 530-276-2044.
EIS No. 20160241, Final, BLM, WA, Vantage to Pomona Heights 230kV 
Transmission Line Project, Review Period Ends: 11/21/2016, Contact: 
Robin Estes 541-416-6728.
EIS No. 20160242, Draft, NMFS, NAT, Amendment 5b to the 2006 
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan, 
Comment Period Ends: 12/22/2016, Contact: Margo Schulze-Haugen 301-427-
8503.
EIS No. 20160243, Draft, USFWS, CA, Otay River Estuary Restoration 
Project San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Comment Period Ends: 
12/05/2016, Contact: Brian Collins 619-575-2704, extension 302.
EIS No. 20160244, Final, NOAA, AK, Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in 
the Arctic Ocean, Review Period Ends: 11/21/2016, Contact: Jolie 
Harrison 301-427-8401.
EIS No. 20160245, Final, BR, MT, Lower Yellowstone Intake Diversion Dam 
Fish Passage Project, Montana, Review Period Ends: 11/21/2016, Contact: 
Tiffany Vanosdall 402-995-2695.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20160197, Draft, NOAA, HI, Heeia National Estuarine Research 
Reserve, Comment Period Ends: 10/30/2016, Contact: Jean Tanimoto 808-
725-5253. Revision to the FR Notice Published 09/02/2016; Extending 
Comment Period from 10/17/2016 to 10/30/2016.

    Dated: October 18, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-25533 Filed 10-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
No. 11047.

#### The Cleveland Trust Co. *v.*Moore.

Decided October 5, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Warren county.

*Messrs. Kline, Tolies & Goff,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. M. Dawson*and *Mr. Willard J. Wright,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew*, C. J., Summers, Spear, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Woodman J. COLLINS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53526.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: Woodman J. Collins applying for writs of habeas corpus, prohibition and certiorari. .

Writ refused. The showing made by applicant is insufficient.

DIXON, J.

is of the opinion that the application discloses *NO*double jeopardy.
No. 11040.

#### Alford, Admr., *v.*Compton, Admr., et al.

Decided October 5, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Putnam county.

*Messrs. Watts & Moore,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Poe & Poe; Messrs. Handy & Unverferth*and *Mr. D. M. Bailey,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### A. M. Appleby, Defendant in Error, *vs.*John McElhannon, *et al.,*Plaintiffs in Error.

1. *Practice, Supreme Court*— Statement *and brief.*— Where plaintiff in error fails to file a statement and brief, the writ will be dismissed.

*Error to Green Oirctdt Court.*

*W- C. Price 8? Wright,*for Plaintiff's in Error.

*McJlfee Sf Phelps,*for Defendant in Error.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This ease is brought here by writ of error. *The*plaintiff in error has entirely failed to file a statement and brief as the statute requires. The writ will therefore be dismissed.

The other Judges concur.
#### Richard Dallas POTTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-384.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 6, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

Appellant Richard Dallas Potts appeals to this Court from an order entered by the Hillsborough County Criminal Court of Record summarily denying a post-conviction motion brought under CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

*730On October 13, 1966, information was filed charging Potts with robbery. On February 3, 1967, he was tried on said information, and when convicted was so adjudged by the Court and sentenced to a term in the State Prison. His motion for new trial was denied and he took a direct appeal from the judgment as entered, on the sole ground that the trial court erred in admitting testimony concerning the commission of another crime by appellant. This Court affirmed the conviction.

On August 28, 1969, he filed motion to vacate the judgment and sentence under CrPR 1.850 and on September 15, 1969, the motion was denied by the Court. On April 9, 1970, he filed a second motion for post-conviction relief, which was likewise denied by the trial Court on May 5, 1970. From the latter order of denial he appeals to this Court.

Only one contention is made here in furtherance of his post-conviction motion, namely, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at the trial.

But no substantial facts are set forth in the motion to sustain such conclu-sory allegation of ineffectiveness. In the absence of sufficient allegations of fact to support such naked averment the Courts of Florida have been uniform in holding such petitions, grounded upon such contention, to be insufficient. Boone v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 869. In fact, such allegations of fact must be so strong as to show that such alleged incompetency of counsel made the trial a mockery or a farce. Plymale v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 57; Coleman v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 854; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 243; Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 695; Crusoe v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 600.

The trial Court is not required to have an evidentiary hearing upon such petition for relief when the allegations of the petition itself are not factually sufficient to warrant relief.

Because of such fatal deficiency of the petition in the instant case, the order appealed from is—

Affirmed.

HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
Order entered January 14, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00868-CR

JUAN GABRIEL SOSA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-12055-L

ORDER

The record was due November 12, 2019. When it was not filed, we notified court 

reporter Debi Harris by postcard dated November 20, 2019 and directed her to file the reporter’s 

record by December 20, 2019. On December 31, 2019, Ms. Harris filed a request for extension 

of time until January 10, 2020. In her request, Ms. Harris notes she was the “main reporter” but 

that “[t]wo other reporters also took testimony.” The reporter who took voir dire has not 

completed her portion of the record which has resulted in the request for additional time. Ms. 

Harris did not inform the Court of the names of the other two court reporters and our attempts to 

contact Ms. Harris by phone have been unsuccessful.
We GRANT the request to the extent we ORDER the complete reporter’s record filed by 

January 21, 2020. We caution Ms. Harris that the failure to file the reporter’s record by that date 

may result in the Court taking whatever action it deems appropriate to ensure this appeal 

proceeds in a more timely fashion, which may include ordering she not sit until the complete 

reporter’s record is filed.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
#### Allimire MIRHOSSEINY v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY and Agricultural and Mechanical College et al.

No. 61236.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Allimire Mirhosseiny applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of *1340Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 351 So.2d 1318.

Writ denied.

TATE, DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.'
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: June 13, 2011 Meeting with Industries Concerned with Implementation of the 

2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

Industries interested in forests products and other fuels met with Suzanne Rudzinski, ORCR 

Director; June 13, 2011 to discuss their issues and concerns with the final rule entitled, 

“Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste,” which was 

published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is referred to as the 

2011 NHSM Final Rule. 

The industry participants discussed the fuel constituent data and their difficulty in implementing 

the contaminant comparisons in the legitimacy criteria assessment in the 2011 NHSM Final 

Rule. 

During that meeting, the industry representatives expressed concerns with the implementation of 

the legitimacy criteria assessments. EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the information 

presented. EPA discussed the method to implement the analysis per the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. 

Attachments:

The Industry representatives shared a handout titled “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary 

Materials That are Solid Waste; Final Rule (40 CFR Part 241) Implications For Forest Product 

Industry Fuels.” 

Additional background data: 

- Forest Products NHSM Data 6-9-11 

- NCASI Statistical Analysis of Boiler MACT Fuels Data from March 2009 

- NHSM Fuel Contaminant Analysis Mill Assessment 4-11 
Expected Meeting Attendees

Representatives from: 

AF&PA 

American Home Furnishings Alliance 

API 

Biomass Power Association 

Composite Panel Association 

Construction Materials Recycling Association 

National Oil Recycling Association 

Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) 

USWAG 

Treated Wood Council 

International Paper 

Invited EPA participants: 

Suzanne Rudzinski, EPA ORCR, Office Director 

James Berlow, EPA ORCR, Division Director 

Tracy Atagi, EPA, ORCR 

Kenneth Dixon, EPA, ORCR 

George Faison, EPA ORCR 

Mimi Guernica, EPA, ORCR 

Charlotte Mooney, EPA, ORCR 

MaryBeth Sheridan, EPA, ORCR 

Matt Straus, EPA, OSWER 

Tab Tesnau, EPA, ORCR 

Marc Thomas, EPA, ORCR
**Exhibit 32.2**Certification     I, Larry E. Carson, certify that:     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citizens, Inc. (the “*Company*”) for theperiod ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “*Report*”), I, Larry E. Carson, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Larry E. Carson Name: Larry E. Carson    Title: Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer    Date: March 30, 2007
#### The State of Missouri, *ex rel.,*Philip Pipkin, Relator, *vs.*George B. Clark, State Auditor, Respondent.

Slate ex rel. Vail v. Draper, 50 Mo. 353, affirmed.

*Mandamus.*

*Jnu. L. Thomas,*<§> *Bro.,*for Eelator.

1. If it be doubtful whether a law be constitutional or not, *70the doubt shall by the court be resolved in favor of the law, and it shall be upheld. (Cool. Con. Lim., 182; 7 Ind. 326 ; 2 Iowa, 280 ; 12 Wheat., 270; 3 Dali., 386; 6 Cranch., 872 ; 2 Pet., 522 ; 1 Cow., 550 ; *é*Dali., 309.)

II. The General Assembly possesses the power to create new circuits, and to ehange the limits of old ones. (Oon. of Mo., Art 6, § *U.)*

III. The General Assembly can pass laws requiring the Judges of the Circuit to remove their residences, or vacate their offices. The shifting of the territorial jurisdiction of a judge is a widely different thing from abolishing his circuit, or attempting to oust him. The latter cannot be done ; the former can. (Atty. Gen. vs. Missmore, lé Wis., 163 ; Iris vs. Choate, 11 Ohio, 511; State vs. Staching, 7 Ind., 328.)

IV. The permanent establishment of the St. Louis Circuit Court, excludes the presumption, that any other is to be permanent, “ *JExpressio unius est exclusio alterms.”*(Sec. 15 Art. 6, Con.)

*H. Olay Ewing,*Attorney General, for Respondent, relied on, Vail vs. Draper, 50 Mo., 353, and the brief of Leonard in that case.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an' application for a mandamus by the relator to require the State Auditor to draw a warrant in his favor for services, as Judge of the 26th Judicial Circuit. The question was before the court at the last July Term, in the case of State *ex rel.*Vail vs. The Auditor, when we determined that Vail was entitled to his salary, as judge for the said Circuit, and that the relator was not. We are now asked to review and reverse that decision. I have re-examined the question, and can perceive no reason for changing the views then entertained.

I fully concur in the reasoning, and in the conclusion arrived at by the court at that time, and am therefore in favor of dismissing the writ.

The other Judges concurring,

the writ will therefore be dismissed.
**Exhibit10.c.**

 

**Summary of Compensation ToBe Paid to Chief Executive Officer**

 

On December 7, 2004, the Board of Directors of Logan County BancShares,Inc. (the “Company”) met to review the performance of the Company for 2004, toestablish the Chief Executive Officer’s and the other executive officer’s basesalary for 2005, and to determine bonuses for the Company’s executive officersfor 2004.

 

Mr. Eddie Canterbury, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, is theonly named executive officer in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement.

 

Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Canterbury’s Employment Agreement with theCompany, the Board of Directors increased Mr. Canterbury’s salary for 2005 to$126,000, which represents an increase of $3,000 from Mr. Canterbury’s salaryfor 2004.  The Board of Directors alsoawarded Mr. Canterbury a bonus for 2004 in the amount of $20,000.

 

----
261 La. 828

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joe S. CUSH and Rufus Wesley Thomas.

No. 52412.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 1972.

In re: Joe S. Cush and Rufus Wesley Thomas applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and/or mandamus.

Application denied; the showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction.
S. 1512 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1335 Jefferson 

Road in Rochester, New York, as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post 

Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST THEODORE MATTHEW GLENDE POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew 

Glende Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1826 

To provide predictability and certainty in the tax law, create jobs, and 

encourage investment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13 (legislative day, DECEMBER 11), 2013 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. BURR, Mr. COCHRAN, Mrs. HAGAN, Mr. 

HELLER, Mr. NELSON, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. MORAN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and 

Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide predictability and certainty in the tax law, create 

jobs, and encourage investment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motorsports Fairness 

5 and Permanency Act’’. 

maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1826 IS

1 SEC. 2. 7-YEAR CLASS LIFE FOR MOTORSPORTS ENTER2 TAINMENT COMPLEX FACILITIES MADE PER3 MANENT. 

4 Section 168(i)(15) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

5 1986 is amended by striking subparagraph (D). 

Æ 

maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



COMSYS IT PARTNERS, INC. AND AFFILIATES



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the
Form 10-Q) for the three months ended October 2, 2005 of COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. (the Issuer).



In connection with the Form 10-Q, the undersigned, Joseph C. Tusa, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of his knowledge:



(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and



(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Issuer as of the dates and for the periods indicated in the Form 10-Q.



Dated: November 16, 2005.



By:

/s/ Joseph C. Tusa, Jr.Name:

Joseph C. Tusa, Jr.Title:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. and will be retained by COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page No y, y ; say Inquiries numbered 7, 16, and 17 are not to be asked in respect to infants. Inquiries numbered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are to be answered haiee a
5 : ne merely by an affirmative mark, as /.

Yy, Y fi \
SCHEDULE 1. stuliaiaats In q MELE 2, ~ of , mM thesC ounty of _. GK VIE Sake”
of _( Wbeaitit. pnt by me on the ff day of TF , 1870.

Post Office: @. itd Lb LoL ue “ala y bees Z dex S ssn Asst Marshal.

| VALUE OF REAL ESTaTs , ip | s | Epvu ct] Coxs STITUTIONAL |
OWNED. = ARENTAGE. TION RELATIONS

=]
-| 8
I
PA

¥.), Black] :

|

If

y
lve month |
us, sy
state
year, stato

&ce.)

| Whether deaf |.

| and dumb,

| blind, insane,
or idiotic.

car
&ce.)

numbered In

Place of Birth, naming State |
or Térritory of U. S.; or the
| Country, if of foreign birth.

M.), Chi-

un (I,)

Profession, Occupation,
or Trade of each person,
male or female.

The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

Fob.,

)
F.)
» Veb.,

your Ki
ons,

Sex.—Males (M.),

tho order of visitation,

“«l or obridged on
ier grounds than r

1070 right to vote is
| bellion or ether crime.

ears of age and uy
ofage andupwards,

Fomales
la,

r
Male Citizens of U.S, of 2

Families, numbered In the order
of visitation
Attonded school within the yen r,

Father of foreign birth.
Mother of foreign birth.

Male Citizens of U.

month (Jan.,

If born within the year,
If married within the

Ago nt last birth-day.

under 1
(B.), Malatto
neso (C,), Indl

month (Jan

Dweolling-houses,
Color.—W hite (

Cannot read,
Cannot write.

in froct

2Q1y
Ww

@ | Value of Real Estate,

©) | Value of Personal Estate.

10

bu oa ill
/

="
—
—
iw
met
Ww
at
om
ae
~)

US LDhiuonts Lt 23 Mi) ——.
, _eutsa Df fF Wh, Lhe nec®)
meee So La tf Mi) te My | =

Ss Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

ay,

SS ae Hh |

\

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

a
oy L2 Np Uf)
Lg Aol UW Hien boakisg

SRKEES

No. of dwellings, No. of white females, No. of males, foreign born,

« © families, * ** colored males, «“ “ females, “

« “ white males, af ta “females, “ © blind,

—— -
————— ~ ——_—— —