alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ref: Aviaservice, LLC seeking exemption for Title 14 C.F.R. 47.65 (US citizenship)

We need the non-citizen corporation exemption because as the authorized dealer for Robinson 

Helicopters in San Juan Puerto Rico, we are required to have a “dealer’s aircraft registration 

certificate”. 

The public as a whole will benefit by having a dealer for this US manufactured product on location 

that can sell, repair and assist in the use of these Helicopters.

This exemption should not adversely affect safety, Robinson Helicopters has processes that have 

been developed during many years of experience and they are using best practices in the industry 

and requiring these from all of their dealers and representatives, including ourselves.

Aviaservice, LLC is seeking the exemption of Title 14 C.F.R. 47.65 (US citizenship) rule, as a business 

located in San Juan Puerto Rico, which requires engaged in the distribution or sale of new aircraft, 

or the distribution or sale of used aircraft.

The Federal Aviation Act provided for issuance of dealer’s aircraft registration certificates to be 

used as an alternative for the certificate of aircraft registration. This form identifies the applicant 

as a person engaged in the business of manufacturing, distributing, or selling aircraft. A citizen of 

the United States means (a) an individual who is a citizen of the United States; or (b) a partnership 

each of whose partners is an individual who is a citizen of the United States; or (c) a corporation or 

association organized under the laws of the United States or a State, the District of Columbia, or a 

Territory or possession of the United States, of which the president and at least two-thirds of the 

board of directors and other managing officers are citizens of the United States, and in which at 

least 75 percent of the voting interest is owned or controlled by persons that are citizens of the 

United States. Title 49 United States Code 40102(a) (15). Aviaservice, LLC does not fulfill with these 

definitions and therefore is seeking the exemption.

As Robinson Helicopters representative for Puerto Rico, this is a requirement for standard 

operations and normal business procedures.
254 La. 138

#### Elizabeth S. LACY, Individually and Administratrix of Karen Lacy and W. O. Lacy v. CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, R. A. Fowler d/b/a R. A. Fowler Trucking Company and Billy M. Bailey.

No. 49839.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Elizabeth S. Lacy, individually, etc. et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bossier. 223 So.2d 200.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### Lucille GADSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1400.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1973.

Lucille Gadson, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme *546Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Tad M. Ballantyne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Capsalus Corp. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Capsalus Corp.





Date:  May 17, 2011
By:
/s/ Tad M. BallantyneTad M. Ballantyne , Chief Executive Officer





I, Patrick G. Sheridan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Capsalus Corp. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Capsalus Corp.





Date: May 17, 2011
By:
/s/ Patrick G. SheridanPatrick G. Sheridan, Chief Financial Officer
#### Charles J. BERGERON, Jr. v. Katherine B. BERGERON.

No. 61274.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Katherine B. Bergeron applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Terrebonne. 351 So.2d 1296.

Writ denied. There is no error of law. The application presents only a factual question.

TATE, DIXON and ' CALOGERO, JJ., would grant the writ.
No. 00-7198.

#### Sowell *v.*Walker, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (Amounts in Thousands, Except Ratios)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                           Three Months
                                                                                          Ended March 31,
                                                                                         -----------------
                                                                                     1998                1997
                                                                                     ----                ----

<S>                                                                                 <C>                <C>     
Income before income taxes...................................................       $  39,428          $172,677

Add (deduct) distributions greater (less) than
     income of unconsolidated affiliates.....................................          (2,190)           (1,055)

Fixed charges from below.....................................................          43,355            12,505

Capitalized interest included in fixed charges...............................          (1,763)             (114)
                                                                                   ----------       -----------

         Earnings available for fixed charges................................       $  78,830          $184,013
                                                                                   ==========       ===========

Fixed charges:
     Interest expense, including amortization of debt expense/discount.......       $  39,183          $ 10,676
     Portion of rentals representing an interest factor......................           2,409             1,715
     Interest capitalized....................................................           1,763               114
                                                                                   ----------        ----------
         Total fixed charges.................................................        $ 43,355          $ 12,505
                                                                                   ==========       ===========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges...........................................             1.8              14.7
                                                                                         ====             =====
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000023426
<NAME> THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            3,970,633
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                            307,468
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 517,041
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             1,235,593
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       6,030,735
<COMMON>                                               122,229
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                              637,981
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                    785,476
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                       1,545,686
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  155,000
<PREFERRED>                                            116,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                 1,812,646
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                      51,750
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                            9,372
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                    0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                            108,408
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                        63,856
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                       2,167,817
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                        6,030,735
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                            2,386,107
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                   181,324
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           1,883,735
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           2,062,081
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                324,026
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                      12,398
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                         333,446
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               128,230
<NET-INCOME>                                           205,216
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             21,185
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                          184,031
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                               164,154
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                              124,350
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                 528,923
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.00
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CheckFree Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Peter J. Kight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



                              /s/ Peter J. Kight
                         ------------------------------------------------------
                         Peter J. Kight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
                         CheckFree Corporation
                         November 14, 2002
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41616

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TOMAS RODRIGUEZ-LEDEZMA 

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-851-ALL

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Tomas Rodriguez-Ledezma

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523

U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision

and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant's motion for summary

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
01/13/201 2 1G:2 4 FA X 202493514 2 FAA+ QM S @l001/00 2



### Gordo n Turne r Attorney s a t

Law 332 5 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD , SUITE 135 0 LO S ANGELES , CALIFORNI A 9001 0 Tel : (213 ) 487-919 0 Fax : (213)487-948 4 

### Januai y 12,201 2 VT A FACSIMIL E<42S ) 227-100 7 KyleE , Lomazo w U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Northv/fis t Mountai n Regio n 160 1 Lin dAve
. S,W
. lx/ \{"^O n Renton , Washingto n 9805 7 (yloi r M /1 ^ Re : Entertainmffl t

Fusio n Group/FA A Cas e No
. 2011NM710CI0 1 Dear Mr
. Lomazow : Pursuan t t o ou r telephon e conversatio n regardin g an extensio n t o respon dt o th e Fina l Notic e o f Propose dCivi l Penalty , enclose di s aStipulatio n signe db y me , i n pleadin g foimat a s requested , for

you r signature
. Onc e signed , pleas e tbrwar dm e acopy . Thankin g yo u i n advanc e for you r continue dcourtes y andcooperation
. Very lTuly,vpuTS ,

GT/ s Z:\CordO D P^i\Cwci\£FO\Lonuzbw,L01.wp d01/19/201 2 19:2 4 FA X 202493514 2 FA A • » QM S 0002/00 2



### 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 Ti e ta w Office s O f

GORDO N TURNE R 332 5 'WOihii e Blvd.
. Suk e 135 0 Lo i Anceles , Gtlifom a9001 0 (ZU ) ^Sy-flSCfeFa x (213 ) 4«7-94 W Sni e Bar No
. 22321 5 ••|.E t
7 'A M 

### riMENTO F PGRWIO N 

### i q P U : 2 3

Attorney s for

Defendant
UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

NORTHWES T MOUNTAI N REGIO N
UNITED STATE S DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATION
. FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

V
. ENTERTAINMENT FUSIO N GROUP FA A CAS E NO
. 2011NM71000 1 STIPULATIO N T O ALLO W ENTERTAINMEN T FUSIO N GROU P T O FEBRUAR Y 3,201 2 T O RESPON D T O TH E FINA L NOTIC E O F PROPOSE D CIVI L PENALT Y

I T I S HEREB Y STIPULATED b y an dbetwee n th e parties , throufi h thei r respectiv e attorney s o f

record , a s follows : Defendant Entertainmen t

Fusio n Grou p ha s unti l Feljiyai y 3,2012 , t o respon dt o th e Final Notic e o f

Propose dCivi l Penalty
. DATED : Januar

y 12.201 2 By : GOKD ( .^itorae y for

Defendant ^ ^ GOKDONTURNE R

DATED : January 12,201 2 U.S : DEPARTMENT O FTRANSPORTATIO N By:
_


### ± KYLEE.LOMAZO W Attorne y for

FA A STffULATIO N 2:\Cv>niQ n Priiu\C3i!c3\EFG\SlipuUUki(i.ivp d
# C_2011301EN.01000101.xml

| 12.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6366 — RWE Innogy/Conetwork)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 301/01

On 5 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6366. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6366. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Charles HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1197.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 8, 1967.

*203Thomas M. Coker, Jr., Public Defender, and Ross E. Mowry, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vero Beach, for appellee.

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

After verdict, Charles Hall was adjudged guilty of murder in the second degree, and upon motion for a new trial being denied, he entered this appeal through the Public Defender. We affirm.

The appellant’s first four assignments of error are that (1) the *verdict*is contrary to the law; (2) the *verdict*is contrary to the evidence; (3) the *verdict*is contrary to the law and the evidence; and (4) the *verdict*is contrary to the weight of the evidence. The verdict of a jury is not a judicial act and is not assignable as error. Florida Appellate Rule 3.5(c), 32 F.S.A. To be of any force and effect assignments of error must be addressed to identified judicial acts.

Appellant’s first point argued is that there is a “material variance between the name of the victim as alleged in the information and that of the person proved to have been attacked by the defendant.” This point comes within the scope of the assignment that the “State failed to prove that the individual shot was the deceased.”

The information charges that the defendant shot and killed Waldo Cokerwolge, Jr., a/k/a Waldo Cokerwolde, Jr., on March 26, 1966. At trial, it was stipulated that “Waldo Cokerwolge, Jr. died on May 11th, 1966 of a gunshot wound.” The defendant testified that he and Mary and Dot and Coker went to the house of “Coker” and “Dot” on the morning of the shooting where “Coker Junior grabbed me” and on cross examination the defendant admitted he shot “Waldo”. The several witnesses identified the man shot on March 26th as “Coker Junior Waldo”, “Waldo”, or “Coker Junior”. The defendant used the name “Waldo” in reference to the man shot when he said, “Waldo, don’t crowd me”. ' There is nothing in the record to suggest that the defendant did not shoot Waldo Cokerwolge, Jr., and all the evidence shows that it was he that the defendant shot with a pistol and it is stipulated that he died of a gunshot wound. The point is without merit.

The defendant’s second point argued is: “Were the comments of the pros*204ecutor in the closing argument prejudicial to appellant?” which is within the scope an assignment of error that “the Prosecutor used improper remarks in his closing argument to the jury”. Appellant’s brief fails to show that any objection was made at trial to such remarks or that any judicial ruling relative thereto was made at trial. We have examined the record in this respect and find the point without merit.

Affirmed.

CROSS and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 06/06-0346]

Notice is hereby given that Stellus Capital SBIC, L.P., 4400 Post Oak Parkway, Suite 2200, Houston, TX 77027, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Stellus Capital SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide loan financing to KelleyAmerit Holdings, Inc. (d/b/a Amerit Fleet Solutions), 1331 North California Blvd., Suite 150, Walnut Creek, CA 94596.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(4) of the Regulations because Stellus Capital SBIC, L.P., seeks to purchase the loan financing to KelleyAmerit Holdings, Inc. from Stellus Capital Investment Corp., an Associate of Stellus Capital SBIC, L.P. Therefore, this transaction is considered discharging an obligation of an Associate, requiring a prior SBA exemption.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on this transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2018-16414 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P