alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1753 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1753

 To extend Government liability, subject to appropriation, for certain 
       third-party claims arising from commercial space launches.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 20, 2013

  Mr. Nelson (for himself, Mr. Thune, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Rubio, Mr. 
  Heinrich, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend Government liability, subject to appropriation, for certain 
       third-party claims arising from commercial space launches.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAUNCH LIABILITY EXTENSION.

    Section 50915(f) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2016''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header History
 You are here: Census.gov ›
  History ›
  FAQs › Innovations FAQs Skip top of page navigation
 History Main
      Agency History
        Director Biographies
          Census Facilities
          Suitland, MD
          Notable Alumni
      Innovations
        Data Collection
          Technology
      Programs
        Agriculture
          Demographic
          Housing
          Economic
          Geography
          Governments
      Through the Decades
        Fast Facts
          Overview
          Index of Questions
          Questionnaires
          Census Instructions
      Genealogy
        Decennial Census Records
          Other Resources
      Reference
        Data@Museums
          Artifacts
          Lesson Plans
          Legislation
          Maps
          Oral Histories
          Privacy & Confidentiality
          Apportionment
          Publications
 Home Page Archive
        2024
          2023
          2022
          2021
          2020
          2019
          2018
          2017
          2016
          2015
          2014    
      FAQs
        Genealogy
          Agency History
          Demographic
          Economic
          Governments
          Agriculture
          Geography
          Innovations
          Miscellaneous
  In this Section: When was UNIVAC I installed at the U.S. Census Bureau?
  Does the U.S. Census Bureau still use punch cards to process census data?
  What is the connection between the U.S. Census Bureau and IBM?
  How does the census help keep me from getting lost?
  When did the U.S. Census Bureau begin using statistical sampling?
 Innovations FAQs The demands placed on the U.S. Census Bureau to collect, process, and tabulate data on the nation's population and economy create an environment that fosters innovation.  Herman Hollerith's electronic tabulator in 1890, the installation of UNIVAC I, the first commercial computer built for civilian use in 1951, and optical character recognition software that read 2010 census questionnaires are examples of the innovative technology employed by the agency to improve its data collection and processing operations. The questions to the left are a few of those frequently asked about the history of the Census Bureau's technological achievements and innovations. census employeesCensus Bureau employees compare census data to maps following the 1930 census.
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Magda Arzola, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 133]

—Judgment, Su*290preme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Tonetti, J.), rendered on or about August 12, 1999, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See Anders v*California, 386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Ellerin, J. P., Lerner, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6004

DARREL R. FISHER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MAUREEN LYONS REARDON; SARAH RALSTON; JUDGE W. EARL BRITT , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:21

- ct

- 03186

- D )

Submitted : August 31, 2023 Decided: October 17, 2023

Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.

Darrel R. Fisher , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6004 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/17/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Darrel R. Fisher seeks to appeal the district court’s order directing the clerk not to accept further filings other than a notice of appeal in Fisher’s previously dismissed civil action. The district court received the notice of appeal after the expiration of the appeal period. Be cause Fisher is institutionalized, the notice of appeal is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to officials at the institution for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 , 276 (1988). The record does not conclusively establish when Fisher deposited the notice of appeal in the institution’s internal mail system. Accordingly, we remand this case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to make this finding and to determine whether Fis her timely noted an appeal under Rule 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack . The record, as supplemented, will then be
returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6004 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/17/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                        AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Three Months Ended           Six Months Ended
                                                                  June 30,                    June 30,
                                                              2000         1999           2000          1999
                                                          -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------


<S>                                                       <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
Net earnings (loss) ...................................   $    68,000   $  (119,000)   $   308,000   $    55,000
                                                          ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========

Common shares outstanding at beginning of period ......     6,487,669     6,475,069      6,480,194     6,475,069

     Effect of shares issued during the period ........            98            --          3,828            --
                                                          -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------

Basic weighted average common shares ..................     6,487,767     6,475,069      6,484,022     6,475,069

Incremental shares from assumed conversions:

     Stock options ....................................            --            --             --         6,285
                                                          -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------

Diluted weighted average common shares ................     6,487,767     6,475,069      6,484,022     6,481,354
                                                          ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========

     Basic earnings (loss) per share ..................   $      0.01   $     (0.02)   $      0.05   $      0.01

     Diluted earnings (loss) per share ................   $      0.01   $     (0.02)   $      0.05   $      0.01
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Cox
Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I,
Jimmy W. Hayes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                               /s/ Jimmy W. Hayes
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Name: Jimmy W. Hayes
                                               Title: Executive Vice President,
                                               Finance and Chief Financial
                                               Officer
                                               Date: February 27, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other
documentation authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cox
Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Cox Communications, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification "accompanies" the annual report on Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cox Communications,
Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the annual
report on Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40724 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS BARDALES STRURBER, also known as Juan Carlos Figueroa-Landeros, also known as Jose Luis Bardales Streber, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-636-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Luis Bardales Strurber appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Strurber argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. Strurber acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), butNo. 02-40724 -2- asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Opinion issued January 30, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00763-CV

———————————

HARCHARAN NARANG AND RANJIT KAUR, Appellants

V.

DAVID TANG, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1110096

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Harcharan Narang and Ranjit Kaur, have filed a motion to dismiss 

this appeal. More than ten days have passed since the filing of the motion, and no 

party has objected to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). No opinion has issued 
2

in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss.
#### Charles Louis ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-170.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 10, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 99.12

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Barrick Gold Corporation (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report).

I, Kelvin P.M. Dushnisky,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 24, 2017



|                          |  |                      
|------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Kelvin P.M. Dushnisky
|Name:                     |  | Kelvin P.M. Dushnisky
|Title:                    |  | President
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1603 

AN ACT 

To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust 

for the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band 

of Pottawatami Indians, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1603 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Lake Trust Land 

3 Reaffirmation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF INDIAN TRUST LAND. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The land taken into trust by the 

6 United States for the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash7 She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians and described in 

8 the final Notice of Determination of the Department of 

9 the Interior (70 Fed. Reg. 25596 (May 13, 2005)) is re10 affirmed as trust land, and the actions of the Secretary 

11 of the Interior in taking that land into trust are ratified 

12 and confirmed. 

13 (b) NO CLAIMS.—Notwithstanding any other provi14 sion of law, an action (including an action pending in a 

15 Federal court as of the date of enactment of this Act) re16 lating to the land described in subsection (a) shall not be 

17 filed or maintained in a Federal court and shall be 

18 promptly dismissed. 

19 (c) RETENTION OF FUTURE RIGHTS.—Nothing in 

20 this Act alters or diminishes the right of the Match-E21 Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians from 
3 

†S 1603 ES

1 seeking to have any additional land taken into trust by 

2 the United States for the benefit of the Band. 

Passed the Senate June 19, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1603 

AN ACT 

To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into 

other purposes. She-Wish Band of Pottawatami Indians, and for trust for the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash-
#### Levonice Scrivens HOWARD, Appellant, v. Leron HOWARD, Appellee.

No. 70-775.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-109345, 333-109346, 333-38435, 333-02879, 33-48395, 33-54483, 333-04775, 333-04823, 333-62087, 333-62103, 333-95409, 333-41328, 333-71502 and 333-97713) of Novell, Inc. of our report
dated December 23, 2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|Boston, Massachusetts         
|December 23, 2008
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1384 

To help ensure that all items offered for sale in any gift shop of the 

National Park Service or of the National Archives and Records Administration are produced in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2013 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To help ensure that all items offered for sale in any gift 

shop of the National Park Service or of the National 

Archives and Records Administration are produced in 

the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Parks Amer5 ican Products Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1384 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING THAT ITEMS SOLD IN CERTAIN FED2 ERAL GIFT SHOPS ARE PRODUCED IN THE 

3 UNITED STATES. 

4 (a) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE.—The Secretary of the 

5 Interior shall ensure that all items offered for sale in any 

6 gift shop or visitor’s center located within a unit of the 

7 National Park System are produced in the United States. 

8 (b) NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINIS9 TRATION.—The Archivist of the United States shall en10 sure that all items offered for sale in any gift shop of the 

11 National Archives and Records Administration are pro12 duced in the United States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
January 28, 2015

Christopher Prine, Clerk of the Court

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

301 Fannin

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

 RE: Ex parte Riku Melartin, 14-14-0926-CR

Dear Mr. Prine:

This letter will confirm that I will be responsible for presenting oral

argument on behalf of Mr. Melartin on March 25, 2015, in the abovestyled and numbered case. 

Pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P.9.5(d), I have today served this notice on

opposing counsel via e-filing.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Brian W. Wice Brian W. Wice

BRIAN W. WICE

BWW:dje

cc: Melissa Hervey

 (HERVEY_MELISSA@dao.hctx.net)

 

ACCEPTED

14-14-0926-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

1/28/2015 11:26:18 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/28/2015 11:26:18 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1661 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 242
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1661

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards of up to $5,000,000 
 for information regarding the attacks on the United States diplomatic 
      mission at Benghazi, Libya that began on September 11, 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 2013

   Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Graham, and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the 
             following bill; which was read the first time

                           November 12, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards of up to $5,000,000 
 for information regarding the attacks on the United States diplomatic 
      mission at Benghazi, Libya that began on September 11, 2012.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED.

    In accordance with the Rewards for Justice program authorized under 
section 36(b) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 
U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State shall offer a reward of not 
more than $5,000,000 to individuals who furnish information--
            (1) regarding the attacks on the United States diplomatic 
        mission at Benghazi, Libya that began on September 11, 2012; or
            (2) leading to the capture of an individual who committed, 
        conspired to commit, attempted to commit, or aided in the 
        commission of the attacks described in paragraph (1).
                                                       Calendar No. 242

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1661

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards of up to $5,000,000 
 for information regarding the attacks on the United States diplomatic 
      mission at Benghazi, Libya that began on September 11, 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 12, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```