alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 6
                                       To
                             The Consolidated Edison
                           Retiree Health Program for
                              Management Employees

                           -------------------------------------

                             Dated December 30, 1998



<PAGE>


      Pursuant to authority granted to the Plan Administrator under the terms of
The  Consolidated  Edison Retiree  Health Program for Management  Employees (the
"Program") to amend the Program,  the undersigned  hereby approves the following
amendments to the Program:

      1. A new subdivision  (e), which shall read as follows,  shall be added to
Section 3.01 effective January 1, 1999:

       "(e) Effective January 1, 1999, Employees who retire and defer receipt of
       their  retirement  Pension under the Management  Plan and the spouses and
       surviving  spouses of such Employees  shall be eligible to participate in
       the Program and to defer  participation in the Program to the same extent
       as Employees  who retire and commence  receiving an immediate  retirement
       Pension  under  the  Management  Plan and  their  spouses  and  surviving
       spouses.  Effective  such date  Employees  who retire  shall no longer be
       required to commence  receipt of an  immediate  retirement  Pension to be
       eligible to participate in the Program."

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument this 30th
day of December, 1998.



                                   
                                          Richard P. Cowie
                                    Vice President-Employee Relations
                                          and Plan Administrator
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

37 38 39 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Centenary International Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Hector A. Patron Costas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of the
            operation of the Company.


--------------------------------
Hector A. Patron Costas
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
March 2, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by ss.906 has been provided
to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       22
1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

111

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 11

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

11

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

11111 1111

1

11 1 1

1

1 11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1 1

1

1

11

1

1

1

11

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

111

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

11

1

11

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1 11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

111

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

111 1

1

11

1

1 11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1 1 11

1 1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1 1 1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1 1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

Fort Berthold Indian Reservation;

North Dakota, US EPA Region 8

£

Disclaimer: EPA makes no claim regarding the accuracy or

precision of these data. Questions concerning the data should

be referred to the source agency. This map does not

necessarily represent EPA's position on any Indian Country

boundaries or the jurisdictional status of any specific location.

Date: June 27, 2012

Map Projection: UTM, Meters, Zone 13N,NAD83.

Data Sources:

Reservations - U.S. Census Bureau (2009);

Counties - U.S. Census Bureau (2009);

Poverty- U.S. Census Bureau Block Groups (2010);

Base - Microsoft Bing web service (2012).

1 Proposed Gas Wells

Fort Berthold Indian Reservation

Population Below Poverty Line

4% to 10%

10% to 16.8%

16.8% to 20%

20% to 32%

Area Enlarged

0 1.75 3.5 7 10.5 Miles

0 4 8 16 Kilometers

Lake Sakakawea
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States: 1965 to 2002 



           First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

2002.....    67.8     67.6
2001.....    67.5     67.7     68.1     68.0
2000.....    67.1     67.2     67.7     67.5

1999.....    66.7     66.6     67.0     66.9
1998.....    65.9     66.0     66.8     66.4
1997.....    65.4     65.7     66.0     65.7
1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2
1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4
\r Revised.
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020

Percent

Annual Rental Vacancy Rates for the United States and Regions: 1968-2022

Recession

Figure 3

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey, March 15, 2023

Recession data: National Bureau of Economic Research, <www.nber.org>

South

Midwest

United States

Northeast

West

2022
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50765 Summary Calendar

__________________ WALTER MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus SCOTT COMSTOCK, Warden; WAYNE SCOTT, Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-23
- - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE' and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Walter Morris appeals the dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) of his civil rights complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Morris alleges new claims against persons not named as defendants in the district court. We will not consider these claims. See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Morris contends that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint because the defendants failed toNo. 95-50765 -2- supervise their subordinates to ensure that he received due process in his disciplinary hearing. Supervisory officials sued under § 1983 are not vicariously liable for the actions of their subordinates. Thompkins v. Belt , 828 F.2d 298, 303 (5th Cir. 1987). A supervisor will have personal liability only if he is personally involved in the constitutional deprivation or if there is a sufficient causal connection between the supervisor's conduct and the violation. Id . at 304. The district court did not err in its dismissal. Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. Morris' motion to stay the § 1983 proceeding pending exhaustion of his state habeas remedies is DENIED.
#### H. A. DOMING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 7343.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

April 8, 1968.

Bruce Waters, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Percy, Macmurdo & Gray, Baton Rouge, for appellee.

Before LANDRY, REID and BAILES, JJ-

BAILES, Judge.

This matter is before us as an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment of the trial court denying his claim for damages allegedly arising ex delicto. Plaintiff contends that he was struck in the eye by a hub cap retaining clip while replacing the hub cap on an Oldsmobile automobile.

At the conclusion of the introduction of evidence the case was assigned for argument in the trial court on May 1, 1967. After argument, the court a quo> rendered judgment rejecting the demands of the plaintiff. On May 3, 1967, this judgment was signed. Plaintiff moved for and was granted an appeal on August 4, 1967, and the required appeal bond was filed on August 10, 1967.

*95The question herein for our resolution is whether the appeal was timely perfected, in the absence of which this court has no jurisdiction.

Under the terms of LSA-C.C.P. Article 1913, as amended, no notice of judgment to the plaintiff was required for the reason the case was not taken under advisement by the trial court. Judgment was rendered at the conclusion of the trial. Consequentially, the delay for applying for a new trial began on Thursday, May 4, 1967, the day following the signing of the judgment, and was completed on May 8, 1967, the following Monday. The intervening Saturday and Sunday, as holidays, are excluded in computing the delay. As no application for a new trial was made, the ninety-day delay or period for the moving for the appeal and the furnishing of bond began tolling on May 9, 1967, and was completed on August 6, 1967. While the plaintiff’s motion for the appeal was timely made on August 4, 1967, the appeal bond was not timely filed as it was not filed until August 10, 1967.

In passing we might mention that on June 2, 1967, the Clerk of Court sent the plaintiff a transcript of the oral reasons for judgment dictated on May 4, 1967. The covering instrument or letter for the transmittal of the oral reasons for judgment was what might be considered an altered form of a notice of judgment which merely stated that enclosed therewith were the reasons for judgment. The sending of this notice on June 2, 1967, even if it could be construed a notice of judgment, does not alter the law that no notice of judgment was required and does not postpone the tolling of the delays as above set forth.

For the foregoing reasons, we must, ex proprio motu, dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. All costs of court to be paid by plaintiff.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Northeast Utilities (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



|    |                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------
|/s/ | Charles W. Shivery                             
|    | (Signature)                                    
|    | Charles W. Shivery                             
|    | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



|    |                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ | David R. McHale                                  
|    | (Signature)                                      
|    | David R. McHale                                  
|    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Date:  March 7, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         100,105
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                       805
<INVENTORY>                                     10,346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,613
<PP&E>                                         291,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 458,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,600
<BONDS>                                        230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                    (37,124)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   458,567
<SALES>                                        128,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,408
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,027
<INCOME-TAX>                                       125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,902
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,902
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
No. 11001.

#### Orewiler *v.*Oberlander.

Decided October 12, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Wyandot county.

*Messrs. Meek & Stalter*and *Mr. Thomas*Beer, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Carter &*Goodrich, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
ENCLOSURE 3

Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision

MAG 2014 Eight Hour Ozone Plan — Submittal of Marginal Area

Requirements for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area
(page intentionally blank)
EXHIBIT 32.2   CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, Steven M Caspers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative, (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:  1.     The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of April, 2011.  By:
     /s/ STEVEN M CASPERSName: Steven M Caspers
Title: Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Cousins Properties Incorporated (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certifies that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gregg D. Adzema                                                                         
|Gregg D. Adzema Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date: February 21,
2012
##### 



Exhibit 32(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of CheckFree Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Peter J. Kight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:  May 14, 2004
    /s/ Peter J. KightPeter J. KightChairman and Chief Executive Officer
CheckFree Corporation This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
# C_2011262EN.01000101.xml

| 6.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6308 — VFC/Timberland)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 262/01

On 29 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6308. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6308. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
No. 9921.

#### The State, ex rel. Bodey, *v.*Clark et al.

Decided January 18, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Champaign county.

*Mr. E. L. Bodey; Mr. H. F. MacCracken*and *Mr. L. D. Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. George Waite*and *544
      *Mr. C. B. Heiserman,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Spear, Davis, Sitauck and Price, JJ., concur.