alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Susan Carboni, Respondent-Appellant, v New York Medical College et al., Defendants, and Ramamohana R. Kancherla et al., Appellants-Respondents.

[736 NYS2d 250]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Ramamohana R. Kancherla, Diane E. Lake, Tauseef Ahmed, and Karen P. Seiter appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated November 28, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which sought a protective order denying their requests for discovery of the psychiatric and psychological records of the plaintiffs decedent, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied that branch of her motion which sought a protective order denying the defendants’ requests for collateral source information.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as cross-appealed from, and that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for a protective order denying the defendants’ requests for collateral source records is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

It is well settled that a party waives the physician-patient privilege by affirmatively placing his or her physical or mental condition in issue (see, *Cynthia B. v New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr.,*60 NY2d 452, 456-457; *Prink v Rockefeller Ctr.,*48 NY2d 309; *Koump v Smith,*25 NY2d 287; *Zimmer v Cathedral School of St. Mary & St. Paul,*204 AD2d 538, 539). However, a party does not waive the privilege with respect to unrelated illnesses or treatments (see, *Sadicario v Stylebuilt Accessories,*250 AD2d 830; *Zappi v Pedigree Ski Shop,*244 AD2d 331). In the instant case, since the plaintiff withdrew claims based on the decedent’s psychiatric and psychological injuries, the Supreme Court properly determined that the decedent’s psychiatric and *474psychological records were not subject to disclosure (see, *Kohn v Fisch,*262 AD2d 535; *Strong v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp. Med. Ctr.,*240 AD2d 726).

However, the Supreme Court also should have granted the plaintiff a protective order denying the defendants’ requests for collateral source information as the plaintiff has not sought to recover the costs of any medical care, custodial care, or rehabilitation services, loss of earnings or other economic loss *(see,*CPLR 4545 [a]). Ritter, Acting P.J., Feuerstein, Goldstein, Friedmann and Crane, JJ., concur.
No. 11159.

#### Peters *v.*Harrison.

Decided November 9, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Wood county.

*Messrs. Troup & Riegle,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Baldwin & Harrington,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed..

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
II 

Calendar No. 8 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 164 

To prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to Pakistan 

until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2013 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JANUARY 29, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To prohibit the United States from providing financial 

assistance to Pakistan until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO 

4 PAKISTAN. 

5 The United States may not obligate or expend any 

6 direct financial assistance to the Government of Pakistan 

7 unless the President certifies to Congress that— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 164 PCS

1 (1) Dr. Shakil Afridi has been released from 

2 prison in Pakistan; 

3 (2) any criminal charges brought against Dr. 

4 Afridi, including treason, have been dropped; and 

5 (3) Dr. Afridi has been allowed to leave Paki6 stan, if such departure is necessary to ensure his 

7 freedom. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
Calendar No. 8 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 164 

A BILL 

To prohibit the United States from providing finanis freed. cial assistance to Pakistan until Dr. Shakil Afridi 

JANUARY 29, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with
1 The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chie f Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2336

___________ Anthony James Moore, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Timothy Schuetzle, in his individual * and official capacities, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 31, 2008 Filed: August 25, 2008

___________ Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. North Dakota inmate Anthony James Moore appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having conducted de novo review of the record, see Johnson v. Blaukat , 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. However, as to Moore’s claim alleging a lack of exercise in administrative segregation, we amend the dismissal to bewithout prejudice, as the record shows he-2- did not administratively exhaust this claim before filing the instant lawsuit. See Johnson v. Jones , 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2003) (inmate must exhaust before filing suit, or dismissal is mandatory).

______________________________
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  Second Quarter 2002 and 2001

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   Second quarter 2002


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.0       7.4       8.3      11.1       7.6
      For rent...........................      2.7       1.9       2.6       3.2       2.4
      For sale only......................      1.0       0.8       1.2       1.2       0.8
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.8       0.9       0.8       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.5       3.9       3.6       6.0       3.6
        For occasional use...............      1.5       1.2       0.6       2.2       1.5
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.9       0.8       0.9       0.6
        For other reasons................      2.2       1.8       2.2       2.9       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.8       3.7       2.8       2.7       2.4

    Occupied.............................     88.1      89.0      88.9      86.2      90.0




                                                   Second quarter 2001

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.1       7.2       8.6      11.3       7.6
      For rent...........................      2.6       1.8       2.8       3.2       2.0
      For sale only......................      1.1       0.7       1.3       1.2       0.9
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.6       0.9       0.9       0.8
      Held off market....................      4.6       4.0       3.6       6.0       3.9
        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.3       0.6       2.2       1.7
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.9       0.9       1.0       0.6
        For other reasons................      2.2       1.8       2.1       2.7       1.6

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.1       4.0       3.0       3.0       2.6

    Occupied.............................     87.8      88.8      88.4      85.7      89.8
#### David UNTERBERG, and Arlene Unterberg, Appellants, v. Martin WHITE and Lillian White, Appellees.

No. 73-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed ChargesExhibit 12(In thousands)Years Ended December 31,Earnings, as defined:20072006200520042003Net income/(loss) from continuing operations beforecumulative effect of accounting change$245,896$132,936$(256,903)$70,423$77,105Income tax expense/(benefit)109,420(76,326)(184,862)22,38819,751Equity in earnings of regional nucleargenerating and transmission companies(3,983)(334)(3,311)(2,592)(4,487)Dividends received from regional equity investees4,5422,1456873,8798,904Fixed charges, as below264,311258,682260,428236,324228,764Preferred dividend security requirements ofconsolidated subsidiaries(9,265)(9,265)(9,265)(9,265)(9,265)Total earnings/(loss), as defined$610,921$307,838$(193,226)$321,157$320,772Fixed charges, as defined:Interest on long-term debt$162,841$141,579$131,870$107,365$88,700Interest on rate reduction bonds61,58074,24287,43998,899108,359Other interest15,82422,37519,2768,58610,254Rental interest factor8,5335,3006,7337,0677,366Amortized premiums, discounts andcapitalized expenses related to indebtedness6,2685,9215,8455,1424,820Preferred dividend security requirements ofconsolidated subsidiaries9,2659,2659,2659,2659,265Total fixed charges, as defined$264,311$258,682$260,428$236,324$228,764Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges2.311.19(0.74)(a)1.361.40(a) Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $453.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, AT HOUSTON

No. 14

- 14

- 00903

- CV

Latricia Smith

v.

RRE Westhollow Holdings, LLC

(No. 1054024 IN CO UNTY CIVIL C OUR T AT LAW NO 2 OF HAR RIS COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

FILING

S TATEWIDE EFILING $175.00
$20.00 11/10/2014

11/10/2014 NOT PAID

NOT PAID ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Housto n, Texas

are $195.00

.

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court

.

I, CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK OF THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT
OF APPEALS for the Fo urteenth District of Texas, April 24, 2015

.
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Barry
C. Kaye, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Coates International, Ltd., certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coates International, Ltd. (the
"Company");





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and I
have:





(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and





(c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and to
the audit committee of the Company's board of directors:





(a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and





6. I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.




August
      13, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Barry
      C. KayeBarry
      C. KayeTreasurer,
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1761 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1761

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 
and establish a private right of action to enforce compliance with such 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 21, 2013

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Brown, and Ms. Warren) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 
and establish a private right of action to enforce compliance with such 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Permanently Protecting Tenants at 
Foreclosure Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION.

    Section 704 of the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 
(12 U.S.C. 5201 note; 12 U.S.C. 5220 note; 42 U.S.C. 1437f note) is 
hereby repealed.

SEC. 3. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.

    The Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009, as amended by 
section 2 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the 
following new section:

``SEC. 704. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.

    ``(a) Right of Action.--Any person aggrieved by a violation 
referred to in subsection (b) may bring a civil action in a court of 
competent jurisdiction for damages resulting from such violation, and 
may obtain other appropriate relief, including equitable relief. If the 
plaintiff prevails in any such action, the court shall award the 
plaintiff any litigation costs reasonably incurred, together with 
reasonable attorneys' fees and reasonable expert witness fees, as 
determined by the court.
    ``(b) Violation.--A violation referred to in this subsection is a 
violation of--
            ``(1) section 702 of this title; or
            ``(2) the matter in subparagraph (C) or (F) of section 
        8(o)(7) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 
        1437f(o)(7)) that was added by the amendments made by section 
        703 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Eddie W. BATES et al. v. Hon. Edwin W. EDWARDS, Governor, etc., et al.

No. 54601.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 26, 1974.

In re: Edwin W. Edwards, et al applying for Supervisory Writs.

Granted. See Order.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Steve A. Alford, Jr., Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 29th day of March, 1974, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 29th day of March, 1974, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
Table B-5.  Standard Errors of Homeownership Rates for the United States by Age of Householder and by Family Status:  1999

                                                                                           One              Two or more
                                                   Married-       Other families     person  household    person households
                                           United    couple
                                           States  families      Male    Female      Male     Female      Male    Female

Total                                         0.1       0.1       (X)       (X)       (X)        (X)       (X)       (X)

  Other family households...............      0.3       (X)       0.5       0.3       (X)        (X)       (X)       (X)
  One person households.................      0.2       (X)       (X)       (X)       0.3        0.3       (X)       (X)
  Two or more persons households........      0.4       (X)       (X)       (X)       (X)        (X)       0.6       0.7
   Less than 25 years...................      0.4       0.9       1.4       0.8       0.9        0.8       (X)       (X)
   25 to 29 years.......................      0.4       0.6       1.5       0.8       0.9        1.0       (X)       (X)
   30 to 34 years.......................      0.3       0.4       1.7       0.8       1.0        1.2       (X)       (X)
   35 to 39 years.......................      0.3       0.3       1.5       0.8       1.0        1.3       (X)       (X)
   40 to 44 years.......................      0.3       0.3       1.5       0.8       1.0        1.2       (X)       (X)
   45 to 49 years.......................      0.3       0.3       1.6       0.9       1.0        1.1       (X)       (X)
   50 to 54 years.......................      0.3       0.3       1.9       1.1       1.1        1.0       (X)       (X)
   55 to 59 years.......................      0.3       0.3       2.2       1.3       1.3        1.0       (X)       (X)
   60 to 64 years.......................      0.4       0.3       2.4       1.5       1.4        1.0       (X)       (X)
   65 to 69 years.......................      0.3       0.3       2.9       1.4       1.4        0.9       (X)       (X)
   70 to 74 years.......................      0.4       0.4       2.6       1.3       1.4        0.8       (X)       (X)
   75 years and over....................      0.3       0.4       1.6       0.9       0.9        0.5       (X)       (X)

     Less than 35 years.................      0.2       0.3       0.9       0.5       0.6        0.6       0.6       0.8
     35 to 44 years.....................      0.2       0.2       1.1       0.6       0.7        0.9       1.3       1.8
     45 to 54 years.....................      0.2       0.2       1.2       0.7       0.8        0.8       1.6       1.8
     55 to 64 years.....................      0.2       0.2       1.6       1.0       1.0        0.7       2.2       2.3
     65 years and over..................      0.2       0.2       1.3       0.7       0.7        0.4       2.4       2.3
State _fR

7—224

TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES.

94

SCHEDULE No. J.—POPULATION.

LOCATION. NAME

of each person whose place of
abode on June 1, 1900, was

DATE OF

EN CEFIES. BIRTH.

A
Sheet No.

3
he ae

Supervisor's District No. _ Whe LLL

Enumeration District No. Sf

Vi ame of Institution, —

tis naten (ereeris cr rett ete _ Ward. of city, -

, Enumerator.

NATIVITY. CITIZENSHIP. OCCUPATION, TRADE, OR

PROFESSION

EDUCATION, OWNERSHIP OF

Place of birth of cach person and parents of each person enumerated. If born in the United
States, give the Slate or Terrilory; if of foreign birth, give the Country only.

in this family.

Enter surname first, then the civen name ani
middle initial, ifauy.

Kelationship of each
yerson to the head
of the family.

Inctuper every person ving on June 1, 190.
Oxutr children bore since June 1, 1900.

Number of theao children

widowed, or divorced,
living,

house, in tho order of

visitation.
order of visitation,

Number of dwelling-
Whother single, married,

Number of family, In the

Place of birth of this
Penson.

é. My LIE.

—— aa eee eS ee

TAGE,

ae /,

i
AAV ALA _V

(] }

ee me Dn ee wwe ee ee eee eee

(ALE
}
= Aidt AD

yy

mo =2 Qa or Cad oO ~ Lao

L MUTQUNN NONMha
V
CY

i]
VALLI EMM GALLS

SG

~ | Number of years in the

of each person TEN YEARS of age
and over.

rot

at
omployed,
w | Attended school (in

Place of birth of Fatrure
of this person.

Place of birth of Morure

of this person, Occvratiox.

the United States,

United tates,

mientha),

Year of tinmigration to
Owned froe or mortgaged.

Can speak Engilah,
Own! of rented,

Farm or louse,

Naturniization,
Month

| Number of farm achodule,

oo |
‘

i=)
~
Pr)
i]
af

———

A ALAA
I A

4

eC A (A ak 2

A, .

VLE S PAMTVUAL

LAVA ANHYY

MPYVWYHV AND

yy

if7,
bi

La)

2

J
a

Y f
4 ;

—
~~

mw
a

=
i

“
vba |

~
o

fore feo We

i, WN)
YALA §

VIVA

seeeee

iW pred '
|Z ltmoitbravec

o

_
~

! lL MEG}

Ldates

i, "
SALAMA
4 e

G C LOM (ose ee ee

PED IL OOM

—
Pa)

—
oe

_
i

AA LA

7 a

WAS SOO

ary
or

pA FO ; || Ly AEE Live PIA]

i
oa

MGAM A

Vy ha

iM)

POV YET

en ee ee

LAALAL

he
om 2

LLG

if ‘

f
SIFY GYLAN LEMAZ

oS

Wi;

ee ee

Visit

the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly

available records like the one shown here.

—

eee lee me ne ee eee eee

I at 44 VZA ALA __ !
WW

x LUI XA
FFL OLS 4:

G /
ES
i/

2. AALALD

y

As
Lh
ia

i

i
(Z Vy:
MAMAN LAZDPUIEE

; 7 |

wo

os

ANIL IAAL.

ww ws 2 rw] 72 -

we

AV VAMNLAALY LA

om

co

ae

co

~ 7 7 wy 7

os

Qe
oS

i)
_

Nei
ws

Se
wn

wo
co oe

~ os
-? Cc

oS
~

im c «£
So 8

fecdoas f

ie
~

peep PAY)

ALyyvanA

HH
- Oo ww

| sed
ao io

==

it.
“2

Dod
if]

we
o

or
So