alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37635-37636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16472]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses; 
Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Research Advisory Committee on 
Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses will meet on September 18, 2018 at the 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20420 in Room 230, at 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. (EST) on September 18, 
2018. All sessions will be open to the public, and for interested 
parties who cannot attend in person, there is a toll-free telephone

[[Page 37636]]

number 1 (800) 767-1750; access code 56978#.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice and make 
recommendations to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on proposed 
research studies, research plans, and research strategies relating to 
the health consequences of military service in the Southwest Asia 
Theater of operations during the Gulf War in 1990-1991.
    The Committee will review VA program activities related to Gulf War 
Veterans' illnesses and updates on relevant scientific research 
published since the last Committee meeting. Presentations will include 
updates on the VA Gulf War research program and descriptions and 
discussions of new areas of research technology and treatments that can 
be applied to the health problems of Gulf War Veterans. Also, there 
will be a discussion of Committee business and activities.
    The meeting will include time reserved for public comments in the 
afternoon. A signup sheet for 5-minute comments will be available at 
the meeting. Individuals who wish to address the Committee may submit a 
1-2 page summary of their comments for inclusion in the official 
meeting record. Members of the public may also submit written 
statements for the Committee's review to Dr. Karen Block by email at 
[email protected].
    Any member of the public seeking additional information should 
contact Dr. Block, Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 443-5600.

    Dated: July 27, 2018.
LaTonya L. Small,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-16472 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
#### Ernest S. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. Eula Bell BALDWIN, Appellee.

No. 71-634.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 10, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Stewart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  First Quarter 1995 and 1994   
                                                            
                                        
                                           Rental vacancy rate                   Homeowner vacancy rate 
                                                                                        
                                                          
                                      First   First   Standard   Standard   First   First   Standard   Standard
                                      quarter quarter error on   error on  quarter  quarter error on   error on 
                                       1995    1994   1995 rate  difference  1995    1994   1995 rate  difference
                       
                                                       
 United States........................ 7.4     7.5       0.2      0.2        1.5     1.4       0.1      0.1
                                                                         
   Inside MAs......................... 7.4      NA       0.2       NA        1.6      NA       0.1       NA
     In central cities................ 8.3      NA       0.3       NA        2.1      NA       0.1       NA
     Not in central cities (suburbs).. 6.4      NA       0.2       NA        1.3      NA       0.1       NA
   Outside MAs........................ 7.4      NA       0.4       NA        1.4      NA       0.1       NA
                                                                      
  Northeast........................... 7.3     7.3       0.4      0.5        1.6     1.4       0.1      0.2
  Midwest............................. 6.7     7.0       0.3      0.5        1.4     0.9       0.1      0.1
  South............................... 8.3     8.2       0.3      0.4        1.6     1.7       0.1      0.1
  West................................ 6.8     7.2       0.3      0.5        1.6     1.6       0.1      0.2
                                                                    
 NA Not available, see page 2 of the press release for explanation.      

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Exhibit 4.3



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated October 25, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 587 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-266193) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 25, 2022
Date 4/8/11 Page of



### POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Summary Page

Updated based on Post-Focus Draft Revision1, 3/31/2011, Test Data Review Engineering Report.

Chemical ID: P-11-0098 Reviewer: Kwon

Endpoints-Assessed Table

Endpoints/Assessment Cycles 1 Releases Assessed in NCEM2? Reasons for not assessing releases

No XB Testing Required No Hazard Concern No Releases Release Below Acute Threshold 5 Release Below Chronic Threshold 5 Other

Ingestion Surface water Ground water (landfill) Consumer Use: DtD 2 Inhalation Air: incineration (stack) Air: fugitive Consumer Use: CEM 3 Dermal Consumer Use: CEM Eco Surface water: ADR conc and/or PDM 4
Consumer Use: DtD

1 Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model.
2 Down-the-Drain
3 Consumer Exposure Model
4 Probabilistic Dilution Model
5 The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch = s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
##### 



Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CheckFree Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Peter J. Kight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 13, 2003
    
    
    
    /s/ Peter J. KightPeter J. KightChairman and Chief Executive OfficerCheckFree Corporation


This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-3206

___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee ,

v. Craig E. Williams, Jr., lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
.

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: December 27, 2022 Filed: January 6, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Craig Williams appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release for the second time and imposed a term of imprisonment, followed by an additional

1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.term of supervised release. Williams’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a

brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of his sentence. Williams raises additional arguments in a pro se brief. After reviewing the record under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, see United States v. Miller , 557 F.3d 910, 915-16, 917 (8th Cir. 2009), we conclude the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. The sentence is within the statutory limits, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(b); 3583(e)(3), (h), (k), and the term of supervised release is presumptively reasonable because it is within the applicable advisory range under the sentencing guidelines, see U.S.S.G. § 5D1.2(b)(2); United States v. DeMarrias , 895 F.3d 570, 572, 574 (8th Cir. 2018). The district court sufficiently considered the relevant statutory sentencing factors and did not overlook a relevant factor, give significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commit a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); Miller , 557 F.3d at 917. The court “was entitled to conduct its own analysis and reach a conclusion of its own, even if it deviated from the parties’ recommendations,” and acted within its broad discretion by imposing the term of supervised release. United States v. Steele , 899 F.3d 635, 639 (8th Cir. 2018); see also DeMarrias , 895 F.3d at 572, 574-75. Williams’s other arguments are contradicted by the record, and any attempt to challenge the reimposed conditions restricting his device usage fails. See United States v. Walker , 814 F. App’x 180, 182 (8th Cir. 2020) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
ACCEPTED12-15-00129-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS8/11/2015 3:44:15 PMCATHY LUSKCLERK
#### Viviane DAUMONT, Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND PARK, Appellee.

No. 70-1030.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 27272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11212]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Land Release for Dunkirk Airport

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice, request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration is requesting public 
comment on the Dunkirk Airport (DKK), Dunkirk, New York, Notice of 
Proposed Release from Aeronautical Use of approximately 2.666 +/- acres 
of airport property, to allow for non-aeronautical development.
    The 2.666 +/- acres of land are proposed to be transferred to the 
Town of Sheridan for use as public right-of-way for the relocation of 
Newell Road. The released lands will be exchanged for the 2.006 acres 
+/- of the existing Newell Road right-of-way currently owned by the 
Town of Sheridan.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Office of the Chautauqua County 
Executive and the FAA New York Airport District Office.

DATES: Comments must be received by June 8, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Otto N. Suriani, Acting Manager, FAA 
New York Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, 
Garden City, New York 11530. In addition, a copy of any comments 
submitted to the FAA must be mailed or delivered to Mr. Gregory J. 
Edwards, County Executive, Chautauqua County, at the following address: 
3 North Erie Street, Mayville, NY 14757.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Otto N. Suriani, Acting Manager, New 
York Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, Garden 
City, New York 11530; telephone (516) 227-3809; FAX (516) 227-3813; 
email Otto.Suriani@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 1st Century (AIR21) requires the FAA 
to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment before the 
Secretary may waive a Sponsor's Federal obligation to use certain 
airport land for aeronautical use.

    Issued in Garden City, New York on May 3, 2012.
Otto N. Suriani,
Acting Manager, New York, Airports District Office, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-11212 Filed 5-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### EVERGLADES LAUNDRY, INC., a Florida corporation, and W. D. Wilson and Kathe P. Wilson, his wife, Appellants, v. GEORGE OBENOUR, JR., & SONS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-174.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 21, 1967.

Klein, Moore & Kline, Miami Beach, Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Da-vant, Miami, for appellants.

Yates & Fann, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL, and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Tripp v. Henderson, 1947, 158 Fla. 442, 28 So.2d 857; Golub v. De Linardy Flooring Co., Fla.1950, 44 So.2d 75; Poranski v. Millings, Fla.1955, 82 So.2d 675.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS CREIGHTON SHRADER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at 

Bluefield. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00270-1)

Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 29, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Creighton Shrader, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Creighton Shrader appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion 

for Clarification and Immediate Release of Defendant Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583.” We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. United States v. Shrader, No. 1:09-cr-00270-1 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 13, 

2021). We deny Shrader’s “Motion for Voidable Application” without prejudice to him 

filing it in the district court in the first instance.

*

 We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We express no opinion on the ultimate disposition of the motion.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1821 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1821

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
    for the relief of victims of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Philippines Charitable Giving 
Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR CHARITABLE CASH 
              CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF OF VICTIMS OF TYPHOON HAIYAN IN 
              THE PHILIPPINES.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any contribution described 
in subsection (b) made after the date of the enactment of this Act, and 
before April 15, 2014, as if such contribution was made on December 31, 
2013, and not in 2014.
    (b) Contribution Described.--A contribution is described in this 
subsection if such contribution is a cash contribution made for the 
relief of victims in areas affected by Typhoon Haiyan, for which a 
charitable contribution deduction is allowable under section 170 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    (c) Recordkeeping.--In the case of a contribution described in 
subsection (b), a telephone bill showing the name of the donee 
organization, the date of the contribution, and the amount of the 
contribution shall be treated as meeting the recordkeeping requirements 
of section 170(f)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

            Passed the Senate March 6, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1821

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
    for the relief of victims of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                        13
<INVENTORY>                                     12,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,160
<PP&E>                                          59,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,638
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,041
<SALES>                                         56,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,389
<CGS>                                           12,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     82
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (27)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 55
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        55
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                      19,647
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    394
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      70,987
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        71,284
<LOANS>                                    304,097
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             418,942
<DEPOSITS>                                 324,761
<SHORT-TERM>                                49,671
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,582
<LONG-TERM>                                    996
<COMMON>                                     8,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             418,942
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             25,799
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,027
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                17
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            29,843
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,239
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       18,604
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  851
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             16,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,413
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,737
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                23.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                23.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                8.39
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,074
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,966
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,675
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  795
<RECOVERIES>                                   422
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,153
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, David
G. Zahka, Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. have reviewed
Talk America Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) and, based on the inquiries I have made or caused
to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief Executive
Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., I hereby certify that:
 
 (i) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (ii) the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America Holdings,
Inc.
 
 
 
 /s/
David G. Zahka
 David G.
Zahka
 Chief
Financial Officer
 May 9,
2005
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert Lee DAVIS.

No. 59763.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

Fred C. Jackson, St. Francisville, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leon A. Picou, Jr., Dist. Atty., A. Z. Butterworth, Sp. Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.