alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
a ae ) sig FIFTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1930
County LUten9 <0 POPULATION SCHEDULE

Township or other
division of coun Bch cacatantak tutte As ME One nincorporated place ________. ais “nes Institution _.___ sateen PE _-.. Enumerated by me on
pame of class, as township, town, precinct, etc. See instructions.) (Enter name of sny unincorporated place having approximately 40 inhebitants or more. Ses instructions.) (insert name of institution, if any, and indicate the lines om which the entries ere meade. See turtructions.)
NAME

(Insert proper name
HOME DATA PLACE OF BIRTH MOTHER TONGUE (OR NATIVE CITIZENSHIP, ETC. OCCUPATION AND INDUSTRY
LANGUAGE) OF FOREIGN BORN ecteally I urs eter 0 vet
eoren of U. 5.

Place of birth of each person enumerated and of his or her parents. If born in s
7| 33 the United Stat ar State or Territory. If of for give country in “os 3 OCCUPATION ERDUGERY: sore ieraan
53 eit chon ay 5 new situated. 1 See Instractions. Distinguish Canada- Langoies tien gypsy 5 <2 Trade; prefecsion, or particular | Industry or busineas, 20 cot- 2
Canada- i | bom mil .
i ren ‘om nglish, and Irish Free State from Northern ‘reland coming to the} ‘2 ©luinns) i mor athnadn begs thesBiag come shored ys cchool, Yes

» of
PERSON MOTHER United Gtates | su | coumy eon Re

PLACE OF ABODE
c= of — ee whose place of abode on ree
dwell- April 1, 1930, was in this family

Rater then the
surname fire, oe

Include persea living 1, 1930, Omit
torn atte April tase

dition

~ | Marital con-

lady
9g

Go

Elcirjt TIT [| Cotor ot race

7

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

st

1

Rear

SE | ee ee

;=

et cor, eal

“le

SSESRESSSAS

iN

aS

Cela. 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 96, 18, 19, 20, and 25—Der afl par-
ABBREVIATIONS TO BE USED wt B - ~ i =e
IN COLUMNS INDICATED: Gumition ‘harks or ~ = - = ¥ wera ee ae = ca Waals
i ca. i Seema eee
Ca, so press bo pearo of sgt nad over.

[Dee no abbreviation fer Slate ex country of birth SRE EATERS Mabe ______
or fer mother beagee (Cobamas 18, 19, 20, and 21)} me z a es ¥ ,
P

-  :\ iene 0

s—%
Exhibit 10.5.2 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO NORTHEAST UTILITIES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR TRUSTEES   The Northeast Utilities Deferred Compensation Plan for Trustees, as amended (the Plan), is hereby further amended, effective September 12, 2006, as follows:  Article 8 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:  This Plan may be amended or terminated by the Board of Trustees or by the Compensation Committee of the Board at any time; provided, however, that no such amendment or termination, unless required under statute, regulation, other law, or rule of a governing or administrative body having the effect of a statute or regulation, shall serve to diminish the rights of a Trustee with respect to amounts credited to his or her Deferred Cash and/or Deferred Stock Compensation Accounts or accelerate payment of such amounts.
#### Horris PHULLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-456.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
From: Pettis, Mike [ mailto:mike.pettis@owenscorning.com ]

Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:49 PM

To: Reeves, David

Cc: Angus Crane; Chris Pool

Subject: Owens Corning FG1 Data set follow

- up

Dave, Thanks for your time today.

As discussed on the call the Newark and Kansas City data sets reconcile but we were unable to do the FG1

particulate data reconciliation at the time of the call. Data from Nov 2002 was presented to us as being

.0048, .011, . 011 (lbs/ton) for the three individual tests. When we look at the data set we get 0.0066 + 0.0113

lb/ton for the first test, 0.0061 + 0.0173 lb/ton for the second usable test, and 0.0080 + 0.0187 lb/ton for the third

usable test. Resulting in test resul ts being 0.0179, 0.0234, and 0.0267 lb/ton for the three tests resulting in an

average of 0.0227 lb/ton which is significantly different that the .0089 which was related to us in the call and was

used to calculate the MACT floor. I was unable to reconci le your results for that data. I would like to point out

that the second test of the series of both stacks was not utilized due to a failed leak check on one stack. Without

discarding the other stack test result at the same time the production data hand ling gets to be an issue. Even so

your results are about half of what we calculate from the same data set.



# Michael Pettis

740

- 328

- 2468 740

- 877

- 7087 (cell)



## Make the World a Better Place
- - '-**--~-** --,--- 

### Devany, Dennis (OST) From: Lizzie Boolukos[beehivebeauty@gmail.com] Sent: :....Sunday, February 14, 2010 11 :59 PM To: Swahson, Brian (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST)**~ubJect:** Cape Airl Colgan Air DearDOT.; lam writing to express my concern that area legislators have voted to replace Cape Air with ColganAir as our area provider. Based onthe information that I have read and researched I feel that this is an erroneous decision. Cape Air has been a plus to our local airport and to end this relationship with them is flawedonmultiple levels. I urge you to reconsider and make the decision to keep Cape Air as our carrier. Sincerely, Elizabeth Boolukos

I

1
EPA Workshop for Communities with Environmental 

Justice Concerns on Proposed Rule to Reduce Carbon 

Pollution from Existing Power Plants

October 30, 2014

9:00 am – 4:30 pm

Crystal Gateway Marriott

1700 Jefferson Davis Highway

Arlington, VA 22202

On June 2, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency issued the proposed Clean Power Plan (CPP) 

rule. This rule proposes state-specific goals for reducing carbon dioxide from the power sector; states

will then need to make plans to to meet the goal. The proposed rule also promotes clean and 

renewable energy options. This is a federal rule that will have important implications for state air and 

energy policies. Therefore, we welcome stakeholders who have environmental justice concerns to

participate and share perspectives about how the rule can be reflective and responsive to the needs 

of environmentally overburdened, underserved, and economically distressed communities across the 

country.

If you are interested in learning how you can help your state achieve cleaner air, reduce the impacts 

of climate change, and promote renewable energy sources, it is important that you understand the 

Clean Power Plan. You have an opportunity to help shape this rule...come learn how!

We encourage you to take advantage of this 1-day workshop, which will:

● Provide an overview of the Clean Power Plan proposed rule.

● Prepare participants to engage effectively in the public participation process.

● Provide EPA staff with a better understanding of key community concerns about the CPP.

● Provide information about the elements of the CPP that are important to communities with 

environmental justice concerns.

● Provide information about how to participate in the public comment process, which is open 

until December 1, 2014.

We look forward to your participation!

To register for this event in-person or online via Adobe Connect click here or visit the link below:

http://events.constantcontact.com/register/event?llr=lzxnl5rab&oeidk=a07e9yvi0gjf3b864bc

Special Notes about Online Participation: 

 If you plan to participate in this workshop online, you must register in order to receive the information 

to participate in the webinar.

o In your registration, you must indicate that you are participating online “via Adobe Connect”

o You will receive the information to participate in the webinar by October 29th, 2014

 Only a limited number of webinar slots are available (130 slots).

 This is a pilot test for EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation using Adobe Connect technologies during a 

public training workshop. Technical difficulties may occur during the webinar with limited support 

available. We welcome your feedback on this session. 

 If you require special accommodations for participating in this webinar, please contact Holly Wilson 

(wilson.holly@epa.gov) by Monday, October 27th. 

REGISTER NOW!
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          65,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                       341
<INVENTORY>                                     11,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,635
<PP&E>                                         344,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 431,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,918
<BONDS>                                        230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   431,894
<SALES>                                        209,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,529
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    700
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                686
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Centenary International Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  Sousa


Carlos
Fabian De Sousa


Chief
Financial Officer


March 22,
2010





This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06542

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06542\06542_Checklist_110410_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06542\06542_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06542\06542_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06542\06542_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06542\06542_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06542\06542_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

06542\Certification Statement_06542.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06542\Supporting Documentation\06542_Reeves_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06542\Supporting Documentation\06542_Reeves_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 32.1



AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report
of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph B. Leonard,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |    
|----------------- |  | ---
|November 14, 2003 |  | By:
|                  |  |    
|                  |  |
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LS POWER FUNDING CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 13, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,473
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 338,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,472
<BONDS>                                        332,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   338,473
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contain summary financial information extracted from the Company's
condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 25, 1999 and the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 25,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                             986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,385
<INVENTORY>                                    104,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,815
<PP&E>                                         196,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 451,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,295
<BONDS>                                        101,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           326
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   451,279
<SALES>                                        360,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               360,721
<CGS>                                          237,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,657
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,334
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
#### Lillie Mae LEE and Lonnie E. Lee, her husband, Appellants, v. The SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-701.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 8, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1971.

George W. Phillips, Tampa, for appellants.

Scott Charlton, of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for appellee.

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

In this case Lillie Mae Lee and Lonnie E. Lee, her husband, appeal to this Court from a judgment entered against them by the Hillsborough County Circuit Court in a case wherein they were suing The South-land Corporation, a Delaware corporation, appellee here and defendant below, for injuries sustained when Mrs. Lee slipped and fell at the front entrance of a 7-Eleven store owned and operated by Southland, and an accompanying cost judgment against the Lees.

At the trial, the Lees testified that Mrs. Lee slipped on a piece of gummed tape. She stated that at the time she did not know what caused her to fall but assumed it was the piece of paper in question. Mr. *269Lee testified that the Store Manager after the accident picked up a piece of brown tape 4 to 6 inches long, from her foot. Neither knew, of course, how long the gummed tape had been on the floor, nor directly how it got there. The Store Manager stated that the only tape the 7-Eleven stores normally carried for sale was cellophane or scotch tape and that groceries and other products were normally unloaded in front of the store but that no deliveries were received on Sundays, which was the date of the accident.

The Lees tendered testimony of a former employee of 7-Eleven, one Bexley, who had worked in approximately ten different 7-Eleven stores and was familiar with their operating procedures, although he had never worked in this particular store. He stated that the uniform procedure at 7-Eleven stores was for merchandise to be unloaded at the front of the store and that gummed tape was used in packaging certain merchandise coming into the stores. The trial Court excluded the testimony of Bexley and at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case granted Southland’s motion for directed verdict, later entering final judgment and the cost judgment. The Lees appeal to this Court and contend that the case should not have been peremptorily taken from the jury. We agree and reverse.

It would serve no good purpose here to further attempt to analyze the evidence in more detail. In a tort action the trial Court should always be extremely chary in directing a verdict at trial, the same as entering a summary judgment before trial. The jury could have found as a reasonable inference that the gummed tape in question had been utilized by Southland in a previous delivery of merchandise to the store; in which event, by its very nature, it could have constituted a hazard for customers or others walking into or out of the store. This is not to even infer that such was actually the case or that the jury would necessarily have so found. It is simply to say that such was within the orbit of legal possibility. It is better that the factual issues be resolved by a jury.

Reversed.

HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.