alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Third Quarter 2002r and 2003


                              Third      Third    Standard   Standard
Age of householder           Quarter    Quarter   error on   error on
                              2002r      2003     2003 rate difference

United States..............      68.0       68.4        0.2        0.2

    Under 25 years.........      23.3       23.3        0.5        0.8
    25 to 29 years.........      39.4       40.2        0.6        0.8
    30 to 34 years.........      54.3       56.6        0.5        0.8
    35 to 39 years.........      65.5       65.6        0.5        0.7
    40 to 44 years.........      71.4       71.7        0.4        0.7
    45 to 49 years.........      75.5       75.3        0.4        0.6
    50 to 54 years.........      77.3       77.8        0.4        0.6
    55 to 59 years.........      80.9       80.4        0.4        0.7
    60 to 64 years.........      81.9       81.8        0.5        0.7
    65 to 69 years.........      83.1       83.0        0.5        0.8
    70 to 74 years.........      82.3       82.3        0.6        0.8
    75 years and over......      78.1       78.9        0.4        0.6

      Under 35 years.......      41.5       42.5        0.3        0.5
      35 to 44 years.......      68.6       68.8        0.3        0.5
      45 to 54 years.......      76.4       76.5        0.3        0.5
      55 to 64 years.......      81.3       81.1        0.3        0.5
      65 years and over....      80.4       80.7        0.3        0.4
rRevised
EXHIBIT 31.1Certification of Principal Executive OfficerI, William J. Gervais, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of QualstarCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this amendment; and  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this amendment, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisamendment.Date: October 28, 2005     /s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAIS      William J. Gervais  Principal Executive Officer
#### Lillian KELLY, Appellant, v. VALPARAISO REALTY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 1-224.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

March 23, 1967.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1967.

Ben L. Holley, of Barrow & Holley, Crestview, for appellant.

Gillis E. Powell, Crestview, for appellee.

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decree of the Circuit Court of Okaloosa County enjoining a continuing trespass and encroachment upon the property of the plaintiff-appellee.

Briefly stated, the facts are: the defendant and her husband, now deceased, purchased some lots in the City of Niceville about 1941, and had moved onto said lots a residence dwelling building. Subsequent thereto some extra rooms were added which caused the building to extend beyond the boundary of the lots owned by the defend*36ants. A yard fence was placed around the property which also encompassed part of lots belonging to the plaintiff-appellee. It appears there was a friendly attitude between the defendant and the plaintiff’s predecessors in title oyer a period of years and in fact, in the not too distant past, the plaintiff attempted to sell the defendant the two lots upon which the defendant’s house was encroaching. The sale was not effected and no satisfactory agreement was reached and therefore the plaintiff brought this action to enjoin the defendant from further encroachment and use of the property. The defendant defended against the complaint on the ground that equitable laches on the part of the plaintiff prevented the plaintiff from being entitled to the relief prayed.

The evidence is clear that the defendant had never paid taxes on said lots upon which the encroachment had occurred and therefore adverse possession under the Statutes could not be claimed by her. The defendant argues that even though she can not claim adverse possession she is entitled to the defense of equitable laches.

We can not agree with the appellant’s contention in this respect. Ordinarily equity follows the law and in the instant case the statutory defense of adverse possession not being available to the defendant-appellant as a defense nor available to her as a basis for an affirmative action to quiet title in her, based upon adverse possession, we do not feel that equity can be invoked to circumvent the statutory law of adverse possession. There is no allegation nor proof of mistaken boundary lines which creates an estoppel against the plaintiff. A mere delay for a long period of time in bringing action where the adverse claimant is in permissive possession only does not preclude the owner from maintaining the necessary action for recovery of possession of said property whether by the injunctive relief as involved here or some other appropriate relief.

For the reasons stated we do not find where the Chancellor erred and therefore must affirm the order appealed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and SPEC-TOR, J., concur.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Avery  Communications,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form  10-QSB/A for the period ending  September 30, 2001, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Patrick J. Haynes,  III,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Patrick J. Haynes, III
Patrick J. Haynes, III
Chief Executive Officer
December 16, 2002


<PAGE>
#### Dominick BRETTI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-477.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 17, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  First Quarter 2007 and 2008

          (in percent)







                                     First      First          90-Percent

Area                                quarter    quarter  Confidence Interval (&plusmn;)a

                                     2007       2008    of 2008 rate of difference



United States.....................      68.4       67.8        0.5         0.4



  Inside Metropolitan

     Statistical Areas............      67.0       66.3        1.3         0.5

    In principal cities...........      54.1       53.0        1.0         0.5

    Not in principal cities

    (suburbs).....................      75.7       75.2        1.2         0.5

  Outside Metropolitan

    Statistical Areas.............      75.1       75.6        2.6         0.7



 Northeast........................      64.8       64.7        0.9         0.8

 Midwest..........................      72.2       72.0        1.0         0.7

 South............................      70.6       69.7        0.9         0.6

 West.............................      63.6       62.8        1.2         0.8

 

    aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence interval is, 

in relation to the size of the estimate, the less reliable the estimate.

Note:  Metropolitan Statistical Area data for 2005 and later are not comparable to earlier data.  Beginning in  first quarter 2005, 

the Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey is using the new metropolitan and micropolitan definitions that were announced by the 

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in June 2003, and were based on the application of the 2000 standards to Census 2000 data.  OMB announced 

updates as of December 2003, based on application of the 2000 standards to more recent Census Bureau estimates.  In this report, outside Metropolitan 

Statistical Areas includes micropolitan and non-metropolitan statistical areas.  The December 2003 definitions

are available at: 

http//www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html and 
http:/www/census.gov/population/estimates/about metro.html.
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Third Quarter 1997 and 1996

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)

                                                     Third quarter 1997
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.6        8.2       10.4
      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.2
      For sale only.......................       0.9        0.9        1.1
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.8        0.7
      Held off market.....................       4.3        3.7        6.5
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        2.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8
        For other reasons.................       2.0        1.8        2.8

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.7        7.4

    Occupied..............................      88.5       90.2       82.1


                                                     Third quarter 1996
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.9        8.3       11.0
      For rent............................       2.7        2.9        2.0
      For sale only.......................       1.0        1.0        1.1
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.8        0.9
      Held off market.....................       4.4        3.7        7.0
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.1        3.2
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.7        0.7        0.7
        For other reasons.................       2.1        1.9        3.1

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.8        1.7        6.9

    Occupied..............................      88.3       90.0       82.1
#### Richard Shepard NIELSEN, Relator, v. Honorable Russell H. McINTOSH, as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-107.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 17, 1971.

Prohibition denied.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header History
 You are here: Census.gov ›
  History ›
   FAQs Skip top of page navigation
 History Main
      Agency History
        Director Biographies
          Census Facilities
          Suitland, MD
          Notable Alumni
      Innovations
        Data Collection
          Technology
      Programs
        Agriculture
          Demographic
          Housing
          Economic
          Geography
          Governments
      Through the Decades
        Fast Facts
          Overview
          Index of Questions
          Questionnaires
          Census Instructions
      Genealogy
        Decennial Census Records
          Other Resources
      Reference
        Data@Museums
          Artifacts
          Lesson Plans
          Legislation
          Maps
          Oral Histories
          Privacy & Confidentiality
          Apportionment
          Publications
 Home Page Archive
        2024
          2023
          2022
          2021
          2020
          2019
          2018
          2017
          2016
          2015
          2014    
      FAQs
        Genealogy
          Agency History
          Demographic
          Economic
          Governments
          Agriculture
          Geography
          Innovations
          Miscellaneous
  Also in this Section: Agency History FAQs
   
    
        Agriculture FAQs
   
    
        Demographic FAQs
   
    
        Economic FAQs
   
    
        Genealogy FAQs
   
    
        Geography FAQs
   
    
        Governments FAQs
   
    
        Innovations FAQs
   
    
        Miscellaneous FAQs
 FAQs This "FAQ" section has been divided into categories to assist you with finding answers to some of the most frequently asked questions the U.S. Census Bureau's History Staff receives.  Choose a category on the left to see if we have answered your questions before. FAQ image
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, James J. Waclawik, Sr., Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Material Sciences Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

c.) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d.) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: May 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     5,108
<RECEIVABLES>                                      300
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,127
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           22,591
<PREFERRED>                                    263,551
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
259 La. 907

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Van HOWARD.

No. 51839.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1971.

In re: Van Howard applying for writ of certiorari or writ of review, and stay order.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
ee ees Ce ee ‘
a a ES Aa
nT Lael | ot ee a
TF ES Fd :
ale TST TT | a a > as fies BS
PAcraries era 1” een — ' y t y rains
; TOTP OF ee! oa Serr

a al .

cceLeerl

ase

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

1.334 244234331955

12
WO 7 De” A BS er”
ww *-" 4 ae
TOOT a

*2i ii Sala a. -

Sare OF RERE eee

wa trai

ey ol A

ee oe ry

eee te

— ag tts

aa ve

onl a ee
~ BE.

‘2 oe

= fren.

"ar

|

Taian]
anand
Lowry
al let |
LT? ating. _|
ara
poo
DF 2
eta
eee
> Sy

SS:

I

a
i

e
:

: ;
‘iif
ii
259 La. 986

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clarence THOMAS.

No. 51092.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 8, 1971.

*270Walton J. Barnes, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst, Atty. Gen., Sargent Pitcher, Jr., Dist. Atty., Ralph L. Roy, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

BARHAM, Justice.

The defendant Clarence Thomas was charged by bills of information with actual and constructive possession and control of a barbiturate, in violation of R.S. 40:1033, and with simple criminal damage to property with damages totaling less than $500.00, in violation of R.S. 14 :56. Not guilty pleas were entered. to both charges, and after the court disposed of certain objections of defense counsel, the cases were tried, and defendant was found guilty of both offenses. For the possession of a barbiturate he was sentenced to six months in parish jail, the sentence to be suspended on good behavior, and for the simple criminal damage to property he was sentenced to pay a fine of $100.00 plus costs. He has appealed.

The State calls attention to our lack of appellate jurisdiction. Since each of the offenses for which the defendant was tried was a misdemeanor and since the sentence imposed in one did not exceed six months and the fine imposed in the other was not in excess of $300.00, this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal in either case. La.Const, of 1921, Art. VII, Sec. 10(5); State v. Brown’s Thrift City Ethical Pharmacy, Inc., 255 La. 827, 233 So.2d 531 (1970); State v. Allen, 256 La. 341, 236 So.2d 490 (1970); State v. Knox, 256 La. 379, 236 So.2d 771 (1970).

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.45

                           [LETTERHEAD OF BANK EXIM]


                         AMENDMENT OF BANK GUARANTEES
               Numbers **6/****-**/*/** through **9/****-**/*/**


CURRENCY                       :UNITED STATES DOLLARS
AMOUNT                         :US$ 25,000,000 EACH (US DOLLARS
                                TWENTY FIVE MILLION EACH)
ISSUED AT                      :JAKARTA, INDONESIA
ORIGINAL DATE OF ISSUE         :OCTOBER 21, 1998
ORIGINAL DATE OF MATURITY      :OCTOBER 21, 2000
EXTENDED MATURITY DATE         :OCTOBER 21, 2001

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, PT BANK EKSPOR IMPOR INDONESIA (PERSERO), PLAZA EXIM, JL.
JEND, GATOT SUBROTO KAV 36-38, JAKARTA 12190, INDONESIA, AND ON INSTRUCTION OF
OUR VALUED CLIENT ****, **** THE BEARER OR HOLDER OF THE ABOVE GUARANTEES. WE
HEREBY IRREVOCABLE, UNCONDITIONAL AND WITHOUT RESERVATION EXTEND THE MATURITY
DATE OF BANK GUARANTEES NUMBER **6/****-**/*/** THROUGH **9/****-**/*/** TO
OCTOBER 21, 2001.

UPON PRESENTATION AND SURRENDER OF THIS BANK GUARANTEES AT THE OFFICE OF PT BANK
EKSPOR IMPOR INDONESIA (PERSERO), PLAZA EXIM, JL. JEND, GATOT SUBROTO
KAV 36-38, JAKARTA 12190, INDONESIA SUCH PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT SET OFF
AND CLEAR OF ANY DEDUCTION OF CHARGES, FEES OR DEDUCTION OR WITHHOLDING OF ANY
NATURE NOW HEREAFTER IMPOSED OR LEVIED, COLLECTED, WITHHELD OR ASSESSED BY THE
GOVERNMENT OF REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR AUTHORITY
THEREOF THEREIN.

THESE GUARANTEES ARE SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR
DOCUMENTARY SECURITIES (1993 REVISION) INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE,
PUBLICATION NUMBER ICC 500.

DATE THIS 15TH DAY OF JULY, 1999

FOR AND BEHALF OF
PT BANK EKSPOR IMPOR (PERSERO)
   JAKARTA PLAZA EXIM BRANCH

           [SEAL]


/s/ ****                /s/ ****
---------------------   ------------------------
   B.43.8                   B.64.1
#### Ethel GRANOWITZ, Appellant, v. ESTATE of Jacob GRANOWITZ, deceased, Appellee.

No. 71-435.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.