alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATEOFALASKA)ss.FIRSTJUDICIALDISTRICT)AFFIDAVITOFORALHEARINGI,ScottSloane,EnvironmentalProgramSpecialistIII,oftheAlaskaDepartmentofEnvironmentalConservation,beingsworn,statethefollowing:OnFebruary3”,2009,at12:3Opm-l:30pm,inthe2°”floormainconferenceroom,at410WilloughbyAvenueinJuneau,Alaska,IpresidedoverapublichearingheldinaccordancewithAS44.62.210forthepurposeoftakingtestimonyinconnectionwiththeadoptionofchangestoTitle18,Chapter50oftheAlaskaAdministrativeCode.Thechangeswouldaccomplishthefollowing:1)updatetheStateAirQualityControlPlantoadoptbyreference“Juneau’sMendenhallValleyPM10LimitedMaintenancePlan,”and2)updatethereferenceat18AAC50.030(2)totheCodeoftheCityandBoroughofJuneaufordeclaring“Airpollutionalertsandemergencies”sothatitreferencesthecurrentCodeasamendedbytheCityandBoroughinSeptember2008.DATE:00Juneau,AlaskacottSloane,E‘iroAmentalProgramSpecialistIIISUBSCRIBEDANDSWORNTObeforemethis___dayof78,STATEOFALASKAOFFICIALSEALNotaryPublicinandfortheaB.Erickson‘WStateofAlaskaNiaARYPUBLIC“‘Mycommissionexpires:5/010MyCommissionExpIres05/10/10STATEOFALASKA))ss.FIRSTJUDICIALDISTRICTAFFIDAVITOFORALHEARINGI,ClintFarr,EnvironmentalProgramManagerI,oftheAlaskaDepartmentofEnvironmentalConservation,beingsworn,statethefollowing:OnFebruary3”’,2009,at12:3Opm-1:3Opm,inthe2floormainconferenceroom,at410WilloughbyAvenueinJuneau,Alaska,IpresidedoverapublichearingheldinaccordancewithAS44.62.210forthepurposeoftakingtestimonyinconnectionwiththeadoptionofchangestoTitle18,Chapter50oftheAlaskaAdministrativeCode.Thechangeswouldaccomplishthefollowing:1)updatetheStateAirQualityControlPlantoadoptbyreference“Juneau’sMendenhallValleyPM10LimitedMaintenancePlan,”and2)updatethereferenceatiSAAC50.030(2)totheCodeoftheCityandBoroughofJuneaufordeclaring“Airpollutionalertsandemergencies”sothatitreferencesthecurrentCodeasamendedbytheCityandBoroughinSeptember2008.DATE:____________Junehu,1AlaskaSUBSCRIBEDANDSWORNTObeforemethis___dayof,2007.NotyPublicinandfortheStateofAlaskaMycommissionexpires:t-to.i:4EiTATEOFALASKAOFFICIALSEALRalphB.EricksonNOTARYPUBLICMyComn,issjonExpire.05/10/go
#### Robert David ROY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. K-52.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 17, 1968.

Robert David Roy, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have given careful consideration to the briefs and record on appeal in this cause and have concluded that appellant received a fair and impartial trial. Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error the judgment appealed is hereby Affirmed. '

WIGGINTON, C. J., JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. C. F. BREAUX INVESTMENT CO., INC.

No. 61264.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana through the Department of Highways, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Terre-bonne. 351 So.2d 1321.

Writ denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board ofDirectors and Shareholders 

**Suffolk Bancorp**

We have issued our reports dated March 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Suffolk Bancorpand subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of Suffolk Bancorp on Form S-3 (File No. 333-160829, effective July, 27,2009). 

GRANT THORNTON LLP 

NewYork, New York 

March 12, 2010
#### Lenora DOCKERY, Administratrix of Estate of Tommy Lee Dockery, Jr., Deceased v. LeDEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., American Development Corporation and Noble Crigler.

No. 50397.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 26, 1978.

*1236Dulaney & Dulaney, William P. Dulaney, Tunica, for appellant.

Sullivan, Smith, Hunt & Vickery, Elzy J. Smith, Jr., Luckett, Luckett, Luckett & Thompson, William 0. Luckett, Sr., Clarks-dale, for appellees.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and WALKER, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
1 

### Medina, Dayana

From: Reitter, Annabeth <Annabeth.Reitter@domtar.com>

Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 2:18 PM

To: Medina, Dayana

Subject: Voice Mail Message

Attachments: removed.txt

Hi Dayana,

I am out with business travel this week but I did received your voice mail message regarding the scrubbing reagent for

use in the add

‐ on scrubber described in the Lundberg document. We are looking into this and will provide you with the

information.

We are currently working on our response to Question 9 pertaining to boiler temperature variability and the effects the

variability has on the technical feasibility of SNCR. We encountered a few delays as we conduct further research for our

response. As a result, we are targeting Friday to provide you with a response to Question 9 and the responses to your

additional questions involving the emission factor for TDF (developed from a fuel sample analysis as noted on page 4 of

our 8/29 response), diagram of the internals for the existing scrubber on PB #2 and scrubbing reagent for the add

‐ on

scrubber described in the Lundberg document.

You also asked for cost information for achieving additional SO2 reductions with the existing scrubber on PB #2 and

when we may be able to provide this additional information. I learned the Ashdown Mill will be beginning a very

extensive maintenance outage addressing the pulping, papermaking and ancillary processes. The outage will begin this

upcoming weekend and lasting for about 2 weeks, with the mill scheduled to begin equipment start

‐ up on September 29

or 30. During this time, our internal engineering resources at the mill will be focused on completing the maintenance

outage work and will have limited availability. We may need to engage outside engineering resources to assist with

reviewing scrubber performance capabilities and develop the requested cost information. With the timing of the

maintenance outage and the possibly need to retain outside engineering resources, we most likely will be able to

provide a response on the requested cost information at the end of the month.

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Thanks,

Annabeth

Annabeth Reitter

Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation

T 715-886-7785 | C 715-459-9257

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the co rrect file and location.

Domta r

301 Point Basse Avenue

Nekoosa, WI 54457

Domtar reminds you to print responsibly. Learn more about paper as a sustainable choice at paperbecause.com

This email is for the exclusive us e of the addressee and is subject to Domtar Confidentiality Notice.
891 A.2d 327

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Eric Jag KAPOOR.

Misc. Docket AG Nos. 3 & 9,

Sept. Term, 2005.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Feb. 3, 2006.

PER CURIAM ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 3rd day of February, 2006

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Eric Jag Kapoor, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Eric Jag Kapoor from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED, that the respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-715(c), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Eric Jag Kapoor.
#### ACME ELECTRIC INC. v. TRAVIS.

No. 38415.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 218 So.2d 788.
Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Coates  International,  Ltd. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2005 (the "Form
10-QSB"),  I,  George J.  Coates,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  and
Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  as of the date hereof,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, the Company's Form
10-QSB fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Security  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the  information  contained in the Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 27, 2006                  By: /s/ George J. Coates
                                             -------------------------------
                                             George J. Coates
                                             President and Chief Executive
                                             Officer and Principal Financial
                                             Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.44


                           [LETTERHEAD OF BANK EXIM]

                              CONFIRMATION LETTER

DATE     :OCTOBER 21, 1998
NUMBER   :***/**1/*/**
REF      :BANK GUARANTEE

DEAR SIR,

WE, PT. BANK EKSPOR IMPOR INDONESIA (PERSERO) JAKARTA PLAZA EXIM BRANCH JL.
GATOT SUBROTO KAV. 36-38, JAKARTA INDONESIA, DO HEREBY CONFIRMED THAT OUR LETTER
ISSUED THE INSTRUMENT AS FOLLOWS.

TYPE            :BANK GUARANTEE
NUMBER          :**8/****-**/*/**
AMOUNT          :US$ 25,000,000.00 (US DOLLARS TWENTY FIVE MILLION)
ISSUED DATE     :OCTOBER 21, 1998
MATURITY DATE   :OCTOBER 21, 2000

TYPE            :BANK GUARANTEE
NUMBER          :**9/****-**/*/**
AMOUNT          :US$ 25,000,000.00 (US DOLLARS TWENTY FIVE MILLION)
ISSUED DATE     :OCTOBER 21, 1998
MATURITY DATE   :OCTOBER 21, 2000

BANK ADDRESS    :JL. GATOT SUBROTO KAV 36-38 JAKARTA INDONESIA
TELEPHONE NO.   :****
FACSIMILE       :****
TELEX NO.       :****

THIS LETTER HAS BEEN REGISTERED IN OUR OFFICE JAKARTA AND ANY CLARIFICATION OR
VALIDATION OF THIS LETTER HAS TO BE ADDRESSED TO THE UNDERSIGNED AND OUR OFFICE
JAKARTA PLAZA EXIM BRANCH, JAKARTA, INDONESIA.

BEST REGARDS,
PT BANK EKSPOR IMPOR INDONESIA (PERSERO)
      JAKART PLAZA EXIM BRANCH

             [SEAL]

      /s/ ****
      ---------------------
             B.43.8


ENDORSEMENT BANK INDONESIA
           [SEAL]


/s/ ****
---------------------------
EXHIBIT 18

April 30, 2001

Board of Directors
Magma Power Company and wholly-owned subsidiaries
Salton Sea Funding Corporation
302 South 36th Street
Suite 400
Omaha, Nebraska  68131

Dear Members of the Board:

At your  request,  we have read the  description  included in Salton Sea Funding
Corporation's  (the "Company")  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  for the quarter  ended March 31,  2001,  of the facts
relating to the change in accounting by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Salton Sea Brine  Processing  L.P.,  Salton Sea Power Generation L.P., Fish Lake
Power  LLC,  and  Salton  Sea  Power  L.L.C.  (collectively,   the  "Salton  Sea
Guarantors")  and CalEnergy  Operating  Corporation,  Vulcan Power Company,  San
Felipe  Energy  Company,  Conejo Energy  Company,  Niguel  Energy  Company,  VPC
Geothermal  LLC, and CE Turbo LLC combined  with  wholly-owned  subsidiaries  of
MidAmerican  Energy Holdings Company,  Salton Sea Minerals Corp., and Salton Sea
Inc.,  (collectively,  the "Partnership  Guarantors") for geothermal well rework
costs  to the  direct  expense  method,  from  the  Salton  Sea  Guarantors  and
Partnership  Guarantors former policy of deferral and amortization of geothermal
well rework costs over the estimated  period between  reworks ranging from 18 to
24  months.  We  believe,  on the  basis of the  facts so set  forth  and  other
information  furnished to us by appropriate  officials of the Company and Salton
Sea Guarantors and Partnership Guarantors,  that the accounting change described
in the Company's  Form 10-Q is to an  alternative  accounting  principle that is
preferable under the circumstances.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company or of the Salton Sea
Guarantors  or the  Partnership  Guarantors  as of any  date or for  any  period
subsequent to December 31, 2000. Therefore,  we are unable to express, and we do
not express, an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q,
on the  related  information  furnished  to us by  officials  of the Company and
Salton  Sea  Guarantors  and the  Partnership  Guarantors,  or on the  financial
position,  results of operations, or cash flows of the Company or the Salton Sea
Guarantors  or the  Partnership  Guarantors  as of any  date or for  any  period
subsequent to December 31, 2000.

Yours truly,


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULE 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mobile Services Group, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    Not applicable
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/  Allan VillegasChief Financial Officer
Written Statement of the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Midwest Express
Holdings, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based
on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert S. Bahlman
----------------------------------------
Robert S. Bahlman
May 15, 2003



     A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section
     1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
     and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 171 

To appropriate such funds as may be necessary to ensure that members 

of the Armed Forces, including reserve components thereof, and supporting civilian and contractor personnel continue to receive pay and 

allowances for active service performed when a Governmentwide shutdown 

occurs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 29, 2013 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. UDALL of New 

Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To appropriate such funds as may be necessary to ensure 

that members of the Armed Forces, including reserve 

components thereof, and supporting civilian and contractor personnel continue to receive pay and allowances 

for active service performed when a Governmentwide 

shutdown occurs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Pay Continu5 ation Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 171 IS

1 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS TO PRO2 VIDE PAY AND ALLOWANCES FOR MEMBERS 

3 OF THE ARMED FORCES AND SUPPORTING 

4 CIVILIAN AND CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL 

5 DURING GOVERNMENTWIDE SHUTDOWN. 

6 During a Governmentwide shutdown, the Secretary 

7 of the Treasury shall make available to the Secretary of 

8 Defense (and the Secretary of Homeland Security in the 

9 case of the Coast Guard), out of any amounts in the gen10 eral fund of the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such 

11 amounts as the Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary 

12 of Homeland Security in the case of the Coast Guard) de13 termines to be necessary to continue to provide pay and 

14 allowances (without interruption) to the following: 

15 (1) Members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, 

16 Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, including reserve 

17 components thereof, who perform active service dur18 ing the funding gap. 

19 (2) At the discretion of the Secretary of De20 fense, such civilian personnel of the Department of 

21 Defense who are providing support to the members 

22 of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (1) as 

23 the Secretary considers appropriate. 

24 (3) At the discretion of the Secretary of De25 fense, such personnel of contractors of the Depart26 ment of Defense who are providing direct support to 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 171 IS

1 the members of the Armed Forces described in para2 graph (1) as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

3 SEC. 3. GOVERNMENTWIDE SHUTDOWN DEFINED. 

4 In this Act, the term ‘‘Governmentwide shutdown’’ 

5 means any portion of a fiscal year during which none of 

6 the appropriation bills for the fiscal year have become law 

7 and an Act or joint resolution making continuing appro8 priations for the fiscal year is not in effect. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
S. 1348 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen 

An Act 

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Award Program 

Reauthorization Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. TERMINATION. 

Section 108 of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 808) 

is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘October 

1, 2018’’. 

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

This Act shall take effect as of October 1, 2013. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

Sa n Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00909

- CV

REFUND ADVISORY CORP

.,

Appellant

v.

Albert URESTI , in his Official Capacity as Bexar County Tax Assessor

- Collector, and Bexar County, Appellee s

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, T exas

Trial Court No. 2018CI08726 Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on April 22, 2019. No further extensions will be granted absent extenuating circumstances

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of March, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### L. C. AYERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-773.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 2, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.