alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2015

-0293 FROM: EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality SUBJECT: Calls with Jatropha Experts
This memorandum provides a record of conversations that EPA staff had with subject matter experts to gather information related to EPA’s evaluation of the greenhouse gas emissions attributable to producing and transporting jatropha oil for biofuels.

**Date of Conversation Subject Matter Experts**  **Topics Discussed** January 23, 2012 Harry Baumes ( USDA Office of the Chief Economist, Terry Coffelt (U SDA ARS, Maricopa, AZ. Performs agronomic studies of new crops), Terry Isbell ( USDA ARS, Peoria, IL. New crops research unit), Roy Scott ( USDA ARS ) USDA research on jatropha. USDA research has been limited becaus e it is not frost tolerant, and ARS tends to focus on plants with potential for domestic development.

February 2, 2012 Terry Coffelt ( USDA ARS, Maricopa, AZ ), Dan Parfitt ( Horticulturist at UC Davis. Researched U.S. jatropha cultivation under funding by Chevron ) Discussed current efforts to grow jatropha around the world, research at UC

- Davis and in Hawaii, the current state of knowledge, and data limitations.
February 15, 2012 Wagner Vendrame ( Tropical Research & Education Center. Horticul turist at University of Florida), Terry Coffelt ( USDA ARS, Maricopa, AZ ) Jatropha research at University of Florida. Limited data on jatropha globally. Relatively minor frost problems in Florida so far.
February 15, 2012 Terry Coffelt ( USDA ARS, Marico pa, AZ ), Jaime Barton ( HARC ), Bob Osgood ( HARC, Director) , Richard Oguchi and Joshua Knight ( University of Hawaii ) Jatropha research in Hawaii. Lack of success globally growing jatropha on marginal lands with low inputs.

February 15, 2012 Rob Bailis ( Ya le School of Forestry ) LCA research on jatropha. Current efforts to grow jatropha around the world. Data sources for jatropha production. January 8, 2013 Bruce Babcock (Iowa State University) Analysis of jatropha using the FAPRI

- CARD model
IC 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1847 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2013 

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

AN ACT 

To provide for the redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center 

for Security Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific 

Center for Security Studies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1847 RFH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC CEN2 TER FOR SECURITY STUDIES AS THE DANIEL 

3 K. INOUYE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR SECU4 RITY STUDIES. 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Department of Defense 

6 regional center for security studies known as the Asia-Pa7 cific Center for Security Studies is hereby renamed the 

8 ‘‘Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Stud9 ies’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

11 (1) REFERENCE TO REGIONAL CENTERS FOR

12 SECURITY STUDIES.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

13 184(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amend14 ed to read as follows: 

15 ‘‘(B) The Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific 

16 Center for Security Studies.’’. 

17 (2) ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS AND DONATIONS.— 

18 Subparagraph (B) of section 2611(a)(2) of such title 

19 is amended to read as follows: 

20 ‘‘(B) The Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific 

21 Center for Security Studies.’’. 

22 (c) REFERENCES.—Any reference to the Department 

23 of Defense Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in any 

24 law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of 

25 the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

S 1847 RFH

1 the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security 

2 Studies. 

Passed the Senate December 17, 2013. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
259 La. 996

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Isaac GRAY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51899.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1971.

In re: Isaac Gray applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
5 = ’ _—- >

; = : a?)
es: —_— 7 <>)
f ‘bar Inquiries numbered 7, 16, and 17 are not to be asked in respect to infants. Inquiries numbered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and : ape
“3 / P @ a: ¥
SonEepvuLe 1.—Inhabitants in Ward Wr =: as , in the County of Hay Slo __, State
~~ MA
of We Tneky, enumerated by me on the “7 * day of Baguat= 1870. ‘ 248
| Post Office: ___ as ithe 6 De bpd , Ass’t Marshal.

Pass
a

VALUS OF Reat Estates
OWNED.

CONSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONS.

atats

:
:
i

The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day of
Jane, 1870, was in this family.

Profeasion, Occupation,
or Trade of each person,
male or female.

and dumb,

or Territory of U. 8.; or the + blind, insane,

Country, if of foreign birth.

Dwelling-honses, numbered in

the erder of visitatioa.

© Families, numbered Ia the order
of visitation,

Age at last birthday. If

under 1

Bex.—Males (M.),

Color.—White (WV.), Black

(B.), Mulatto (M.), Chi-| °

nese (C.), Indian (I.)

Value of Real Estate,

If born withiu the year, state

month (Jan., Feb., &e.)

If married within the year,

o—
Ps

month (Jau., Feb., &c.)

Attended schoo] within

Male Citizens of U. 8. 0

2) years of age and op-

right to vote
denied or abridged
other grounds than.

bellion or other crime.

ears of age and up

y
whiee

Male Citizens of U. 8.

ce em 4* CO oH ee BH OH

=

=

=

te

is

i]

wm

wm Ww 6

te

2

{

:

:

£

53
| |
i .

we

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

a & oe ue . a
. a»
° — aT) = 5

Falene—

No. of dwellings, o/ No.of whitefemaley, No. of males, foreign born, 7+
“4 ferilies, a 7“ “ oolored-males,. Die “ 4 females, “
“ 4 white males,
#### Erby O. YOUNGBLOOD, Appellant, v. Darrine Parham YOUNGBLOOD, Appellee.

No. 70-537.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Jerry Rhodes CHANCE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41560.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 7, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 15, 1972.

Certiorari dismissed. 251 So.2d 11.

ROBERTS, C. 'J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Table 7. Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:
          First quarter 1996 and 1995
                                                                                
                                                                               
                         First       First      Standard     Standard
                       Quarter     Quarter      error on     error on
                          1996       1995      1996 rate   difference
                                                                    
 United States.........  65.1        64.2           0.2          0.2
                                                                    
   Less than 25 years..  17.0        13.8           0.6          0.8
   25 to 29 years......  35.1        34.3           0.6          0.8
   30 to 34 years.....   52.6        52.1           0.5          0.8
   35 to 39 years......  61.1        62.3           0.5          0.7
   40 to 44 years......  68.3        67.7           0.5          0.7
   45 to 49 years......  74.4        73.3           0.5          0.7
   50 to 54 years......  77.0        76.9           0.5          0.8
   55 to 59 years......  79.4        79.0           0.6          0.8
   60 to 64 years......  81.2        79.8           0.6          0.8
   65 to 69 years......  82.7        80.0           0.6          0.8
   70 to 74 years......  81.5        81.0           0.6          0.8
   75 years and over...  75.4        73.8           0.5          0.7
                                                                    
     Less than 35 years  38.8        37.7           0.4          0.5
     35 to 44 years....  64.6        64.9           0.4          0.5
     45 to 54 years....  75.5        74.9           0.4          0.5
     55 to 64 years....  80.2        79.4           0.4          0.6
     65 years and over.  79.1        77.5           0.3          0.5

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
#### Mrs. James E. KELLY, Jr., Individually and as Curatrix of James E. Kelly, Jr., and the minors, James E. Kelly, III and Tracy Kelly. v. U. S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO., Vulcan Materials Co., Gary Milhorne, Al Boudreaux, Jim Sheets, James D. Avants, Norman Neal, M. J. Mott, J. Lockwood, Jean Crook, Ted J. Bagwell and K. Babin.

No. 61505.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Mrs. James E. Kelly, Jr., etc. et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 353 So.2d 349.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Donald J. SVOBODA and Glaze Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, v. PORCELITE ENTERPRISES, INC., a District of Columbia Corporation and James D. Ketterman, Appellees.

No. 72-1104.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 2, 1973.

Appeal quashed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 180 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 180

To delay the enforcement of any rulings of the National Labor Relations 
      Board until there is a final resolution in pending lawsuits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2013

 Mr. Barrasso introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To delay the enforcement of any rulings of the National Labor Relations 
      Board until there is a final resolution in pending lawsuits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``NLRB Freeze Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. DELAY IN ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN RULES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
determinations made by the National Labor Relations Board with respect 
to which unconstitutional members were part of the Board's quorum, 
shall not be given any force or effect until the date on which final 
judgment is entered in all cases challenging the constitutionality of 
the appointment of members to such Board during a recess of the Senate 
that are pending before a Federal court on the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (b) Definition.--The term ``unconstitutional member'' means a 
member of the National Labor Relations Board who was appointed during a 
recess of the Senate and who is the subject of a cause of action 
relating to such appointment that is pending before a Federal court on 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
113447-1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. )

JOHN JAY HOOKER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) No. 01A01-9606-CH-00259

)

BROOK THOMPSON, et al., )

)

Appellees, )

)

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. )

LEWIS LASKA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) No. 01A01-9606-CH-00280

)

BROOK THOMPSON, et al., )

)

Appellees, )

)

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. )

LEWIS LASKA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) No. 01S01-9606-CH-00114

)

BROOK THOMPSON, et al., )

)

Appellees. )

____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

____________________________________________________________________

The matters currently pending before this Court are a Petition to Rehear filed

by Appellant Hooker, Appellees' Motion for Clarification and Appellees' Motion to

Supplement the Record filed by the Attorney General, Petition on behalf of Holly K.

Lillard and Jerry L. Smith to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Responding to

Appellees' Motion for Clarification, Petition for Rehearing and Motion to Supplement

the Record filed by appellant Laska, Appellees' Petition to Rehear filed by the Attorney

General and Motion of Penny J. White to Intervene.
113447-1 2

The Court has considered these matters and it is ORDERED:

1. With the exception of Appellees' Motion for Clarification, all of the

aforementioned motions and petitions are DENIED.

2. In response to Appellees' Motion for Clarification, the equitable relief

granted in this matter is limited to the case sub judice, involving the election for the

vacancy on the Supreme Court bench resulting from the resignation of Justice O'Brien,

which vacancy has been filled in the interim by Justice Penny White. No equitable

relief granted in this Court's orders of July 5, 8, and 9 shall apply to the intermediate

appellate court judges, who are not parties to this action, and this Court's order of July

5, 1996 at page 3, paragraph 3, is clarified and amended by deleting the words "and

all other similarly situated incumbent appellate judges who have declared their

candidacy prior to May 16, 1996".

ENTERED this 10th day of July, 1996.

________________________________________

WILLIAM H. D. FONES, CHIEF JUSTICE

________________________________________

MARTHA S. L. BLACK, JUSTICE

_______________________________________

LIN S. HOWARD, JUSTICE

_____________________________________

A. C. WHARTON, JR., JUSTICE

_________________________________

S. MORRIS HADDEN, JUSTICE
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Housing Vacancies and Homeownership
   Housing Vacancies and Homeownership
 Skip to looking for section Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  The Housing Vacancies and Homeownership provides current information on the rental and homeowner vacancy rates, and characteristics of units available for occupancy. These data are used extensively by public and private sector organizations to evaluate the need for new housing programs and initiatives.  In addition, the rental vacancy rate is a component of the index of leading economic indicators and is thereby used by the Federal Government and economic forecasters to gauge the current economic climate.
 Latest Quarterly Residential Vacancies and Homeownership Report
   Data Tables
   Annual Tables
 Annoucements Is it Over Yet? Assessing the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Housing Vacancy Survey Estimates for 2020 and 2021 [PDF]   API  application programming interface
 You May Be Interested In You May Be Interested In  Interactive Tool Time Series/Trend Charts
                        Create your own customizable time series.
                        View More
   Mobile Application FRED Economic Data
                        Receive the latest updates on the nation's key economic indicators by downloading the FRED App for both Apple and Android devices. FRED, the signature database of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, now incorporates the Census Bureau's 13 economic indicators.
                        View More
   Around the Bureau Related Topics
                        See other pages that are related to this program.
                        View More


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
No. 11288.

#### Pabst Brewing Company *v.*Peltz et al.

Decided February 15, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Klein & Harris,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Miller & Linder,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
No. 11319.

#### Howard, Admx., *v.*Bush et al.

Decided November 30, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Morgan county:

*Messrs. Barry & Lyne,*for plainti ff in error.

*Messrs. Ivers & Danford,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
Table 7. Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:
          Third Quarter 1995 and 1994 
                                     
                                    
                         Third       Third      Standard     Standard
                       Quarter     Quarter      error on     error on
                          1995       1994      1995 rate   difference
                                                                     
 United States.........  65.0        64.1           0.2          0.2 
                                                                    
   Less than 25 years..  17.0        15.0           0.6          0.8
   25 to 29 years......  33.8        33.4           0.6          0.8
   30 to 34 years.....   53.8        51.2           0.5          0.8
   35 to 39 years......  62.0        61.6           0.5          0.7
   40 to 44 years......  69.0        67.3           0.5          0.7
   45 to 49 years......  74.1        74.5           0.5          0.7
   50 to 54 years......  77.0        76.9           0.5          0.8
   55 to 59 years......  78.1        78.5           0.6          0.8
   60 to 64 years......  80.5        80.5           0.6          0.8
   65 to 69 years......  80.9        80.1           0.6          0.8
   70 to 74 years......  81.0        80.5           0.6          0.8
   75 years and over...  74.7        73.2           0.5          0.7
                                                                    
     Less than 35 years  39.1        37.5           0.4          0.5
     35 to 44 years....  65.4        64.3           0.4          0.5
     45 to 54 years....  75.4        75.5           0.4          0.5
     55 to 64 years....  79.3        79.4           0.4          0.6
     65 years and over.  78.1        77.2           0.3          0.5
                                                                                                             
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Exhibit 10.32.3  AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SPECIAL SEVERANCE PROGRAM FOR OFFICERS OF NORTHEAST UTILITIES SYSTEM COMPANIES   The Special Severance Program for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies (the Plan), is hereby amended, effective September 12, 2006, as follows:  Article VIII, Subsection (a) of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:  (a) Amendment or Termination.  Prior to the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board may amend or discontinue this Program at any time upon providing prior written notice to each Participant specifying the changes to be made.  Any amendment will not be effective until at least two years following such notice, except in the case of an amendment that does not materially impact the timing or amount of benefit provided or is required under statute, regulation, other law, or rule of a governing or administrative body having the effect of a statute or regulation.  Upon and following a Change of Control, this Program may not be amended or terminated in any way that would eliminate or reduce the payments and benefits owing to Participants under the Program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          33,290
<SECURITIES>                                    19,699
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,433
<PP&E>                                          35,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,756
<BONDS>                                        114,767
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                    (38,250)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,228
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,657
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,775)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,775)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.74)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Neurotech Development Corporation on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: January 31, 2003

/s/ Bernard Artz
---------------------------
Bernard Artz, Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer & Chief Financial Officer