alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

                       AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT

         AMENDMENT NO. 2, dated May 6, 2004, (this "Amendment") to that certain
Rights Agreement, dated September 29, 1995, as amended (the "Rights Agreement"),
between TRANSPRO, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and AMERICAN
STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY ("Rights Agent").

         WHEREAS, a Distribution Date pursuant to the Rights Agreement has not
occurred as of the date of this Amendment and the Rights are currently
redeemable; and

         WHEREAS, the Company wishes to cure an ambiguity in the drafting of the
Rights Agreement and change the Final Expiration Date thereof;

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound
hereby, agree to amend the Rights Agreement as follows:

1. The final sentence of Section 27 of the Rights Agreement is hereby deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following:

         "Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no
supplement or amendment shall be made at such time as the Rights are not then
redeemable which (i) decreases the stated Redemption Price, (ii) decreases the
period of time remaining until the Final Expiration Date or (iii) modifies a
time period relating to when the Rights may be redeemed."

2. Section 1(k) of the Rights Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:

         "(k) "Final Expiration Date" shall mean September 30, 2004."

3. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts each of which shall be deemed
to be an original and all of which shall together constitute one and the same
instrument.

4. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Rights Agreement.

                            (signature page follows)

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the day and year first written above.

TRANSPRO, INC.                           AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY

By: /s/ Richard A. Wisot                 By: /s/ Joseph F. Wolf
Name: Richard A. Wisot                   Name: Joseph F. Wolf
Title: Vice President                    Title: Vice President
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 176 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 176

To reject the final 5-year Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing 
 Program for fiscal years 2013 through 2018 of the Administration and 
   replace the plan with a 5-year plan that is more in line with the 
            energy and economic needs of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2013

 Mr. Vitter (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, and Mr. Sessions) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reject the final 5-year Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing 
 Program for fiscal years 2013 through 2018 of the Administration and 
   replace the plan with a 5-year plan that is more in line with the 
            energy and economic needs of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEASING PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (c), the Draft Proposed 
Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program 2010-2015 issued by 
the Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this section as the 
``Secretary'') under section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands 
Act (43 U.S.C. 1344) shall be considered to be the final oil and gas 
leasing program under that section for the period of fiscal years 2013 
through 2018.
    (b) Final Environmental Impact Statement.--The Secretary is 
considered to have issued a final environmental impact statement for 
the program applicable to the period described in subsection (a) in 
accordance with all requirements under section 102(2)(C) of the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
    (c) Exceptions.--Lease Sales 214, 232, and 239 shall not be 
included in the final oil and gas leasing program for the period of 
fiscal years 2013 through 2018.
    (d) Eastern Gulf of Mexico Not Included.--Nothing in this section 
affects restrictions on oil and gas leasing under the Gulf of Mexico 
Energy Security Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note; Public Law 109-432).
                                 <all>
```
#### Harold W. HOLCOMBE, Appellant, v. Bettie GAY et al., Appellees.

No. 73-71.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 2, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# CA2011367EN.01000301.xml

| 16.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 367/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 367/3

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION

EPSO/AD/205/10

ADMINISTRATORS (AD 7)

(2011/C 367 A/02)

Taxation

| BUONO | Dario |
| --- | --- |
| BUSSINK | Jannetje |
| DANIELESCU | Dan-George |
| GUILLOU | Morgan |
| HEMMELGARN | Thomas |
| HRDINKOVA | Milena |
| KOLESHANSKA | Malina |
| LANZA | Costantino |
| LAPALUS | Bertrand |
| MITROGIANNI | Ioanna |
| MOLES PALLEJA | Pere |
| MUNIZ SANCHEZ | Maria Del Carmen |
| ROCHALA | Agnieszka |
| TILSTRA | Jaap Walter |

BUONO

Dario

BUSSINK

Jannetje

DANIELESCU

Dan-George

GUILLOU

Morgan

HEMMELGARN

Thomas

HRDINKOVA

Milena

KOLESHANSKA

Malina

LANZA

Costantino

LAPALUS

Bertrand

MITROGIANNI

Ioanna

MOLES PALLEJA

Pere

MUNIZ SANCHEZ

Maria Del Carmen

ROCHALA

Agnieszka

TILSTRA

Jaap Walter

The reserve list will be valid until 12 October 2014.

12 October 2014

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Corning Natural Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending September 30, 2011 (the "Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael I. German, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and I, Firouzeh Sarhangi, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Dated:  January 27, 2012
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1536 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 

include in any proposed rule that limits greenhouse gas emissions and 

imposes increased costs on other Federal agencies an offset from funds 

available to the Administrator for all projected increased costs that 

the proposed rule would impose on other Federal agencies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2013 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. HELLER, and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to include in any proposed rule that limits 

greenhouse gas emissions and imposes increased costs 

on other Federal agencies an offset from funds available 

to the Administrator for all projected increased costs 

that the proposed rule would impose on other Federal 

agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1536 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agency PAYGO Act 

3 of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. OFFSETS FOR INCREASED COSTS TO FEDERAL 

5 AGENCIES FOR REGULATIONS LIMITING 

6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—If the Administrator of the Envi8 ronmental Protection Agency proposes a rule that limits 

9 greenhouse gas emissions and imposes increased costs on 

10 one or more other Federal agencies, the Administrator 

11 shall include in the proposed rule an offset from funds 

12 available to the Administrator for all projected increased 

13 costs that the proposed rule would impose on other Fed14 eral agencies. 

15 (b) NO OFFSETS.—If the Administrator proposes a 

16 rule that limits greenhouse gas emissions and imposes in17 creased costs on one or more other Federal agencies but 

18 does not provide an offset in accordance with paragraph 

19 (1), the Administrator may not finalize the rule until the 

20 promulgation of the final rule is approved by law. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# 2022 NAPCS Structure
# C_2011273EN.01000101.xml

| 16.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6302 — F2i/AXA Funds/G6 Rete Gas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 273/01

On 24 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6302. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6302. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-125870) of Consolidated Edison, Inc. relating to the Con Edison AutomaticDividend Reinvestment and Cash Payment Plan; (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-04463-99) relating to the Con Edison 1996 Stock Option Plan; (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-118159) relating to The ConsolidatedEdison Stock Purchase Plan; (iv) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-108903) relating to The Consolidated Edison, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan and Senior Executive Restricted Stock Awards; and (v) the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-114222) relating to debt and equity securities of Consolidated Edison, Inc. of our report dated February 16, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

New York, New York 

February 22, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1616

ELENI TADELE, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: January 27, 2010 Decided: February 17, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irena I. Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA I. KARPINSKI, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Lindemann, Assistant Director, Ethan B. Kanter, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eleni Tadele, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Con vention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and agree that Tadele is statutorily barred from asylum and withholding of removal on the ground that she provided material support to a terrorist organization. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(2)(A)(v) (2006); 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(B)(iv) (2006); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(d)(2) (2009). * We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tadele (B.I.A. Apr. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

* Although the statutory bar does not extend to deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture, see 8 C.F.R. § 1208.17(a) (2009), Tadele does not challenge the denial of this form of relief on appeal. She has therefore waived appellate review of this claim. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004) (finding that failure to raise a challenge in an opening brief results in abandonment of that challenge).
#### Henry T. SPIEK, Appellant, v. Betty J. SPIEK, Appellee.

No. 70-963.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 14, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Housing Vacancies and Homeownership
 Skip to looking for section Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  2024 Release Schedule for Housing Vacancies and Homeownership (CPS/HVS)
  **Period Covered**
			**Quarterly Residential Vacancies and
			Home Ownership Report**2024 Quarter 1
			April 30, 2024 (Tuesday)2024 Quarter 2
			July 30, 2024 (Tuesday)2024 Quarter 3
			October 29, 2024 (Tuesday)


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Exhibit
21   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT  State of
IncorporationNortheast Utilities (a
Massachusetts business trust)
MAThe
Connecticut Light and Power Company
CTCL&P
Funding LLC
DEHolyoke Water
Power Company
MANorth
Atlantic Energy Corporation
NHNorth
Atlantic Energy Service Corporation
NHNortheast
Nuclear Energy Company
CTNortheast
Utilities Service Company
CTNU
Enterprises, Inc.
CTNortheast
Generation Services Company
CTE. S. Boulos
Company
CTSelect
Energy, Inc.
CTPublic
Service Company of New Hampshire
NHPSNH Funding
LLC
DEThe
Quinnehtuk Company
MAThe Rocky
River Realty Company
CTWestern
Massachusetts Electric Company
MAWMECO Funding
LLC
DEYankee Energy
System, Inc.
CTYankee Gas
Services Company
CT
**Exhibit 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF REGISTRANT**

 

Registrant has no parent; see proxy statement for Registrant’sprincipal shareholders.  The followingare Registrant’s subsidiaries included in the consolidated financialstatements:

 
| **Name of  Subsidiary  (Each Owned 100% by Registrant  Except as Otherwise Stated)** |   | **State or Other  Jurisdiction  of Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                 |   |                                               |
| Castle Concrete Company                                                              |   | Colorado                                           |
| Continental Catalina, Inc.*                                                          |   | Arizona                                            |
| Continental Copper, Inc.                                                             |   | Arizona                                            |
| Continental Quicksilver, Inc.                                                        |   | Idaho                                              |
| Continental Uranium, Inc.                                                            |   | Colorado                                           |
| Edens Industrial Park, Inc.                                                          |   | Illinois                                           |
| McKinney Door and Hardware, Inc.**                                                   |   | Colorado                                           |
| Phoenix Manufacturing, Inc.                                                          |   | Arizona                                            |
| ProSoft International, Inc.**                                                        |   | Colorado                                           |
| Rocky Mountain Ready Mix Concrete, Inc.                                              |   | Colorado                                           |
| Transit Mix Concrete Co.                                                             |   | Colorado                                           |
| Transit Mix of Pueblo, Inc.                                                          |   | Colorado                                           |
| Williams Furnace Co.                                                                 |   | Delaware                                           |

 

----

* owned by Continental Copper, Inc.

 

**owned by Transit Mix Concrete Co.

 

----
Minn E.=

cc: Francisco Ortiz Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
#### Boy McPHERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-116.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 20, 1967.

John W. Burton, Wauchula, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Dickinson v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 170 So.2d 594; Moffett v. State, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 408; Robertson v. State, 1927, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534; Talley v. State, 1948, 160 Fla. 593, 36 So.2d 201, and Williams v. State, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 654.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

SADIE MARIE TODD, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 22-30064 

D.C. No. 9:21-cr-00038-DLC-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 14, 2023**

Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Sadie Marie Todd appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges 

her guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for possession with intent to 

distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Todd’s counsel has filed a brief stating 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 21 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-30064 

that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record. We have provided Todd the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. 

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Todd waived her right to appeal her conviction and sentence. Our 

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United 

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss 

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the

                United States:  Second Quarter 2004 and 2005



(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)





                                    Second    Second   90-Percent

                                   quarter   quarter Confidence interval(&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>  2005

Type                                 2004      2005    of 2005       of      Percent

                                   estimate  estimate  estimate  difference  of total



All housing units.................  122,002   123,732       (X)        (X)       100



  Occupied........................  106,066   107,850       336        307        87

    Owner occupied................   73,449    73,974       633        432        60

    Renter occupied...............   32,617    33,876       536        412        27



  Vacant..........................   15,936    15,882       352        314        13

    Year-round vacant.............   11,947    11,970       345        298        10

      For rent....................    3,775     3,720       171        192         3

      For sale only...............    1,261     1,370        89        110         1

      Rented or sold,

      awaiting occupancy..........    1,079     1,073        72        101         1

      Held off market.............    5,832     5,807       247        215         5

        For occasional use........    1,965     1,946       145        127         2

        Temporarily occupied

        by persons with

        usual residence elsewhere.    1,066     1,112       110         95         1

        For other reasons.........    2,801     2,749       172        150         2



    Seasonal vacant...............    3,989     3,912       227        200         3



    <sup>a</sup>A 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.

The larger the confidence interval is, in relation to the size of the estimate, the less 

reliable the estimate.

    (X)  Not Applicable.  Since the number of housing units is set equal to an independent 

national measure, there is no sampling error, and hence no confidence interval.

NOTE:  Since first quarter 2003, the Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey 

(CPS/HVS) estimates have been controlled to independent housing unit counts.  Doing so 

should make the CPS/HVS estimate of housing units more comparable to other Census Bureau 

housing surveys.
#### Fred R. GANGELHOFF, Appellant, v. LOKEY MOTORS COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.

No. 71-870.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 17, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.