alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 1, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           AUG-1-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              AUG-3-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-1-1997
<CASH>                                          64,933
<SECURITIES>                                     1,666
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     73,269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,411
<PP&E>                                         831,397
<DEPRECIATION>                                 153,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 828,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,757
<BONDS>                                         62,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,533
<OTHER-SE>                                     629,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   828,705
<SALES>                                      1,123,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,123,851
<CGS>                                          387,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  540,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,859
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             86,598
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,598
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
        

</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1570 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize advance 

appropriations for the Indian Health Service by providing 2-fiscal-year 

budget authority, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 10, 2013 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, and 

Mr. SCHATZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize advance appropriations for the Indian Health 

Service by providing 2-fiscal-year budget authority, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian Health Service 

5 Advance Appropriations Act of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1570 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADVANCE APPROPRIATIONS FOR CERTAIN INDIAN 

2 HEALTH SERVICE ACCOUNTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 825 of the Indian Health 

4 Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. 1680o) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘There are au6 thorized’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(b) For each fiscal year, beginning with fiscal year 

9 2015, discretionary new budget authority provided for the 

10 Indian Health Services and Indian Health Facilities ac11 counts of the Indian Health Service shall include advance 

12 discretionary new budget authority that first becomes 

13 available for the first fiscal year after the budget year. 

14 ‘‘(c) The Secretary shall include in documents sub15 mitted to Congress in support of the President’s budget 

16 submitted pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United 

17 States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and each succeeding fis18 cal year detailed estimates of the funds necessary for the 

19 Indian Health Services and Indian Health Facilities ac20 counts of the Indian Health Service for the fiscal year fol21 lowing the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted.’’. 

22 (b) SUBMISSION OF BUDGET REQUEST.—Section 

23 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended— 

24 (1) by striking ‘‘(37) the list’’ and inserting 

25 ‘‘(39) the list’’; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1570 IS

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

2 paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(40) information on estimates of appropria4 tions for the fiscal year following the fiscal year for 

5 which the budget is submitted for the following ac6 counts of the Indian Health Service: 

7 ‘‘(A) Indian Health Services. 

8 ‘‘(B) Indian Health Facilities.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1834 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

depreciation rules for property used predominantly within an Indian 

reservation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17, 2013 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the depreciation rules for property used predominantly within an Indian reservation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEPRECIATION 

4 RULES FOR PROPERTY ON INDIAN RESERVA5 TIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (j) of section 168 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

8 paragraph (8). 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1834 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

3 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  Second Quarter 1998 and 1997

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                    Second     Second  Standard
                                   quarter   quarter   error on  Standard     1998
Type                                 1998      1997      1998    error on   Percent
                                   estimate  estimate  estimate difference  of total

All housing units.................  117,401   115,722       235        334       100

  Occupied........................  103,521   102,046       245        347        88
    Owner occupied................   68,347    67,094       242        341        58
    Renter occupied...............   35,174    34,952       198        280        30

  Vacant..........................   13,880    13,676       133        188        12
    Year-round vacant.............   10,672    10,356       118        166         9
      For rent....................    3,112     3,043        65         92         3
      For sale only...............    1,167     1,107        40         56         1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy..........      980       905        37         51         1
      Held off market.............    5,413     5,301        85        120         5
        For occasional use........    1,818     1,920        50         72         2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence elsewhere.      921       960        36         51         1
        For other reasons.........    2,674     2,421        60         84         2

    Seasonal vacant...............    3,208     3,320        66         94         3
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
April 10, 2008

135820

IN THE MATTER OF

HONORABLE MARY BR OUILLETTE BARGLIND JUDGE, 41 ST CIRCUIT COURT

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

On order of the Court, the request by the Judicial Tenure Commission for appointment of a master is considered and Honorable Patricia L. Micklow is appointed Master to hear Form al Complaint No.83.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
April 10, 2008
Clerk
#### Tommie Lee KENNEDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 6, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Fourth Quarter 2001 and 2000

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     Fourth quarter 2001
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.9        8.1       12.0
      For rent............................       2.7        2.8        2.4
      For sale only.......................       1.1        1.1        1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.6        0.6        0.6
      Held off market.....................       4.5        3.6        7.7
        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        2.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.9        0.8        1.0
        For other reasons.................       2.1        1.6        3.8

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.8        1.5        7.6

    Occupied..............................      88.3       90.4       80.4



                                                     Fourth quarter 2000
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.5        7.8       11.1
      For rent............................       2.5        2.6        2.1
      For sale only.......................       1.0        0.9        1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.6        0.6        0.6
      Held off market.....................       4.4        3.7        7.0
        For occasional use................       1.5        1.1        2.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.9
        For other reasons.................       2.1        1.7        3.4

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.5        7.9

    Occupied..............................      88.6       90.7       81.1
No. 11310.

#### The East Liverpool Publishing Co. *v.*Todd.

Decided November 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana county.

*Messrs. Brookes & Thompson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. H. Spence,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Leo JACOBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-482.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 20, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Vaughn J. Rudnick, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  First Quarter 2003 and 2004

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   First quarter 2003

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.4       7.5       8.4      12.0       7.6
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.1       2.7       3.7       2.7
      For sale only......................      1.0       0.6       1.1       1.2       0.9
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.7       0.7       0.8       0.7       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.7       4.2       3.7       6.4       3.4
        For occasional use...............      1.7       1.5       0.7       2.4       1.5
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      1.0       0.9       0.9       1.2       0.6
        For other reasons................      2.1       1.8       2.1       2.8       1.3

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.9       3.5       3.4       2.6       2.4

    Occupied.............................     87.7      89.0      88.2      85.3      90.0



                                                   First quarter 2004


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................       100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.9       8.1       9.4      12.5       7.6
      For rent...........................      3.2       2.7       3.3       3.7       2.7
      For sale only......................      1.0       0.5       1.4       1.2       0.8
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.7       0.7       0.9       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.9       4.2       4.0       6.6       3.5
        For occasional use...............      1.7       1.4       0.7       2.6       1.4
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.9       0.8       1.0       0.6
        For other reasons................      2.4       2.0       2.4       3.0       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.0       3.9       3.0       2.7       2.9

    Occupied.............................     87.0      88.0      87.6      84.8      89.4
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 183 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for fairness 

in hospital payments under the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2013 

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself and Mr. COBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for fairness in hospital payments under the Medicare 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hospital Payment 

5 Fairness Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUNSET OF MEDICARE HOSPITAL PAYMENT PROVI7 SION. 

8 Section 3141 of the Patient Protection and Afford9 able Care Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww note) is amended by 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 183 IS

1 inserting ‘‘and before October 1, 2013,’’ after ‘‘October 

2 1, 2010,’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-61080) pertaining to the Qualstar Corporation 1998 Stock Incentive Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-162169) pertaining to the Qualstar Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated September 18, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Qualstar Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2010.







/s/  Ernst & Young LLP


Los Angeles, California


September 23, 2010
#### In the Matter of Lenny Pearson, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[736 NYS2d 636]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), entered June 27, 2001 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed petitioner’s motion for reargument as time barred.

Petitioner, an inmate at Gouverneur Correctional Facility in St. Lawrence County, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination of the amount of previously served jail time to be credited against his State prison sentence. Supreme Court partially granted the petition by crediting petitioner with additional periods of jail time.

Respondents’ subsequent motion for reargument was granted and, in an order entered January 8, 2001, Supreme Court amended its earlier decision by recalculating petitioner’s jail time credit. Petitioner was served with a copy of the court’s order on January 10, 2001. Petitioner submitted the subject motion for reargument on February 21, 2001. Supreme Court dismissed the motion as untimely as it was filed over 30 days after petitioner had been served with the court’s original order on January 10, 2001. Petitioner appeals.

A motion to reargue must be made within 30 days after service of a copy of the prior order with notice of entry *(see,*CPLR 2221 [d] [3]; *see also, Matter of Glicksman v Board of Educ. / Cent. School Bd. of Comsewogue Union Free School Dist.,*278 AD2d 364). Our review of the record reveals that petitioner’s motion papers were not filed until after the 30-day limitations period had expired. Accordingly, we find that the motion was properly dismissed as time barred.

*911Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
#### FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. William NETTLES, the Florida Industrial Commission and C. J. King, Respondents.

No. 36618.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 8, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1967.

Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster and John R. Beranek, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Dudley Burton, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lake-land, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 22, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The attorney for the respondent William Nettles is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7519

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ABBAS SADEGH, a/k/a Abby,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-95-113-A)

Submitted: February 26, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999

Before ERVIN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abbas Sadegh, Appellant Pro Se. Justin W. Williams, Assistant

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is dated September 17,

1998, the district court’s records show it was entered on the

docket sheet on September 18, 1998, which is the date we take as

the effective date of the court’s order. See Wilson v. Murray, 806

F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, 79(a).

2

PER CURIAM:

Abbas Sadegh appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for appointment of counsel to prepare a successive motion

pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Sadegh, No. CR-95-113-A (E.D.

Va. Sept. 18, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
260 La. 401

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Taylor CRITTLE.

No. 52040.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1972.

In re: Taylor Crittle applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Guy E. Humphries, Jr., Judge of the Ninth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Rapides, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 30th day of March, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A. M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald FLEMING.

No. 59796.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

Robert E. Lee, Gretna, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mam-oulides, Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Director, Research and Appeals Division, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 1 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of February , 2019, the “Emergency Application to

Appoint Counsel to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Extend Time to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal” and the Application to Expedite are DENIED.