alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SERVED SEPTEMBER24, 2012
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

In The Matter Of: ) ) ) ) ) FLEET AVIATION, LLC, Respondent DocketNo.**F~A-2011-1117** Case No. 2010EA110021

ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING On September 24, 2012, the Complainant, the Federal AviationAdministration

.(FAA), filed an Agency's Withdrawal ofComplaint. The FAA's Withdrawal of Complaint stated thatthe FAA and the Respondent, Fleet Aviation, LLC, had reached a settlement andthat the FAA was withdrawing its Complaint (served September 23, 2011).There is a Rule.16 Litigation Scheduling Conference currently set in this matter. ItIs Hereby Ordered: 1) The October 4, 2012 Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, set for 2:00pm EST, is cancelled. 2) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), has Withdrawnits Complaint (served September 23, 2011), and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: Service List

### FDMSNO. FAA-2011-1117

· (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 205.91 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 · Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1
ONE COPY 

### Gregory S. Whiton, Respondent's Counsel 

### The Aviation Law Firm One Research Court, Suite 45.0 Rockville, MD 2085.0 TEL:**301-294-85~0** 

### FAX: 301-294-2525 Zachery 

### M.. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AEA-7 Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 The Honorable J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC**2~591;** Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.


### -2-
260 La. 405

#### WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY v. INTRASTATE PIPELINE CORPORATION et al.

No. 52038.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1972.

In re: Intrastate Pipeline Corporation and James R. Mary applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 254 So.2d 643.

Writ denied. As to the denial of dismissal of appeal and preliminary injunction, there is no error of law. As to all other matters, the judgment is not final.
Table 9.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the

                United States:  2006 and 2007



(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)





                                                      90-Percent

                                                Confidence Interval +/-  2007

Type                        2006        2007      of 2007      of      Percent

                          estimate    estimate   Estimate  difference of total



All housing units.......     126,012     127,958       (X)        (X)      100



  Occupied..............     109,575     110,306        245        227      86

    Owner occupied......      75,380      75,159        564        480      59

    Renter occupied.....      34,195      35,147        483        426      27



  Vacant................      16,437      17,652        292        263      14

    Year-round vacant...      12,459      13,276        303        273      10

      For rent..........       3,737       3,848        138        142       3

      For sale only.....       1,836       2,117         77         85       2

      Rented or sold,

      awaiting occupancy       1,108       1,130         49         63       1

      Held off market...       5,778       6,181        216        195       5

        For occasional u       1,858       1,993        125        113       2

        Temporarily occupied

        by persons with

        usual residence        1,198       1,139         95         88       1

        For other reason       2,722       3,049        154        137       2



    Seasonal vacant.....       3,978       4,376        207        189       3





(X) Not applicable.  Since the number of housing units is set equal to an independent national measure,

there is no sampling error, and hence no confidence interval.

\1 A 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence interval

is, in relation to the size of the estiamte, the less reliable the estimate.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Cox Communications, Inc. (the Company)
for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of
the date hereof, I, James O. Robbins, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ James O. RobbinsName: James O. RobbinsTitle: President and ChiefExecutive OfficerDate: March 17, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other documentation
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Cox Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Cox Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification
accompanies the amended annual report on Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of Cox Communications, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or
after the date of the amended annual
report on Form 10-K/A, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
Exhibit 23.1 - Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)
of Congoleum Corporation, as amended, of our report dated February 9, 2001
included in the 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders of Congoleum Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Congoleum
Corporation, as amended, for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of Congoleum
Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-34653 and 333-84387) pertaining to the Congoleum Corporation
1995 Stock Option Plan and the Non-Qualified, Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan of this report on the financial statement schedule and our report
dated February 9, 2001, with respect to the 2000 financial statements of
Congoleum Corporation incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form
10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 17, 2001
No. 11046.

#### Hall *v.*Bates et al.

Decided December 14, 1909.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Anne S. Hall,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Bates & Meyer,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Victor Edward JENNINGS, Appellee.

No. K-268.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 28, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 16, 1969.

George D. Gabel, Jr., of Kurz, Toole, Taylor & Moseley, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Madsen & Briggs, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Ma r1 4 1 2 09:50 a ReepBeil & Lair d

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3
1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 ^ 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 3 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 4 Richar dA . Recp , Esq . REEP
. BEL L & UMRD
. P.C
. 295 5 Stockyar dRoac l P.O
. Bo x1696 0 Missoula , Monlan a59808-696 0 Telephone : (406 ) 54 1 -410 0 Facsimile : (406)541-410 1 Attorney s fo r

Annorcoa t

US A 406541410 1


### ifUNSPORTATIO N .jCr;[: : OPERAtlON S P- 2



# m

# ' m q P 1 : 5 1

UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC A DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC EO FHEAI^TNG S WASHINGTON . D.C . L NTH EMATTE ROF : ARMORCOATUSA . ) FAACaseNo.20lONM7l004 5 ) Administrativ e La w Judg e ) Richar dC . Goodwi n ) ARIVIORCOA T USA' S REQUES T FO R WITHDR-WVA LO FREQUES T FO RREARIN G COME S NOW , Aimorcoa t US Aan dpursuan t

t o th e Settlemen t

Agreemen t

reache di n tlii s matte r

hereb y request s tha t

it s reques t

fo r hearin g b e withdrawn . DATE D Uii s /

9 da y o f

iMarch , 2012 . REEP , BEL L

Ri<5har dA . Rec p Attorney s for

Armorcoa t

US A

PAG E 1 .Ma r1 4 1 2 09:50 a Res p Bell a Lair d 406541410 1 P. 3



### 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 

## 2 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 

### 2- 1 CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E

I , th e undersigned , d o hereb y certif y tha t o nth e I H " da y o f

March , 2012 . atni e an d
correc t cop y o f th e foregoin g wa s serve dupo nth e followin g a5 indicated : [)( ] U.S . Mai l [ 1 Han dDeliver y [ 1 Federa l Expres s pC ] Facsimil e [ ] Certifie dMail , Rctur u Receip t Requeste d 

# f , J U.S . Mai l ] Han dDeliver y I ] Federa l Expres s I ] FacsimiJ c I j Certifie dMail , Retur nReceip t Requeste d Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbc r Wrigii t Building , Suit e 2W100 0 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n SO O Independenc e Avenu e S W Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Kyl e E . Lomazo w FA AOffic e o f

Regiona l Counse l 160 1 Lin dAvenu e S W Renton , Washingto n9S05 7 

# uo.fiiAY^jj

u Lbi / n^\j^b \

PAG E 2 .
#### In re ESTATE of Louis SEDITA, Deceased. Alfonso L. SEDITA, Individually and as Executor, Appellant, v. Velia Sedita RAMETTA et al., Appellees.

No. 71-761.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 22, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
April 24, 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

QUINCY DOUGLASS SMIT H, SR. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00019

- CV V.

CAROL A. SMITH , Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment
signed by the court below on January 6, 2012. Having considered the motion and found
it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by r eason of this appeal be paid by

QUINCY DOUGLASS SMIT H, SR.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit15.1**

----

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-130371 and 333-14214) of BT Group plc of our report dated May 17, 2006 relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006.

| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers    LLP                     |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                            |
| 1 Embankment PlaceLondon WC2N 6RHUnited KingdomMay 31,2006 |
|                                                       |

----
Exhibit 10.4  Following is a summary of the compensation arrangement between Northeast Utilities and the members of its Board of Trustees.  Each Trustee who is not an employee of Northeast Utilities or its subsidiaries receives an annual retainer. The Lead Trustee and the Chairs of the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Finance Committees receive additional annual retainers specified below. All retainers are payable quarterly. One-half of the value of the retainers to the Chairs of the Audit and Compensation Committees is payable in the form of Northeast Utilities common shares. The following table sets forth the amounts of non-employee Trustee retainers for 2006:   RetainerAnnual AmountAnnual Retainer (all Trustees)$45,000Lead Trustee$50,000Audit Committee Chair$20,000Compensation Committee Chair$15,000Corporate Responsibility Committee Chair$7,500Corporate Governance Committee Chair$7,500Finance Committee Chair$10,000   In addition to the retainers, each non-employee Trustee receives $1,500 for each meeting of the full Board attended, in person or by conference telephone, during the year and $1,250 for each Committee meeting attended through March 7, 2006.  Subsequent to March 7, 2006, the rate for attendance at Committee meetings by each non-employee Trustee increased to $1,500.  Trustees participate in the Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan), under which each non-employee Trustee is eligible for share-based grants each calendar year. Effective in 2007, subject to any voluntary deferral election, each Trustee will receive common shares upon vesting of the grants one year after the date of grant  A non-employee Trustee who is asked by either the Board or the Chairman of the Board to perform additional Board-related services in the interest of the Northeast Utilities System will receive additional compensation of $750 per half-day plus necessary expenses. In addition, when the spouses of Trustees are invited to attend functions of the Board, the Company pays for the travel-related expenses of the spouses that attend such functions. The payment of a Trustees spousal expenses is considered imputed income to the individual Trustee, and the Company makes a gross-up payment to each such Trustee to cover the tax liability for the imputed income associated with such spousal expenses.
Site ID1874718747Inspections18747EnforcementActions18747Violations[1 to 10 of 10]ProgramAirPI IDNAMEACTIVEADDRESS[street_name][municipality][zip]TYPEREPORTS17965 AES RED OAK LLC N832 RED OAK LN, &JERNEE MILLS RD,Sayreville, NJ 08872AIRAir Permit SI18195 AES RED OAK LLC Y832 RED OAK LN,Sayreville, NJ 08872AIR OPERATINGPERMITSAir Permit SIDPCC121900660000 AES RED OAK, LLC Y832 RED OAK LN,Sayreville, NJ088722740DPCC MAJORFACILITIESEnf. Actions by PIHazardous WasteNJR000041350 AES RED OAK Y832 RED OAK LN,Sayreville, NJ 08872HW GENERATOREnf. Actions by PINJX000340075 AES RED OAK, LLC N832 RED OAK LN,Sayreville, NJ 08872HW GENERATOREnf. Actions by PILab CertificationPage 1 of 2NJDEP-OPRA browser base3/6/2010http://datamine2.state.nj.us/DEP_OPRA/OpraMain/pi_main?mode=pi_by_site&sort_order=PI_NAMEA&Select+a+Site:=1874712017 AES RED OAK LLC N832 RED OAK LN,Sayreville, NJ 08872ENVIRONMENTALLABAnnual Cert. ParametersRight-to-Know00000007050 AES RED OAK LLC Y832 RED OAK LN,Sayreville, NJ 08872POLLUTIONPREVENTION/RIGHTTO KNOWEnf.Actions byPITCPA5620 AES RED OAK LLC Y832 RED OAK LN,Sayreville Boro, NJ 08872TCPA FACILITIESEnf.Actions byPIWater Quality228236 AES RED OAK Y832 RED OAK LN,Sayreville Boro, NJ 08872NJPDESEnf.Actions byPIWater Supply1292 AES RED OAK LLC NRED OAK POWERPLANT, Sayreville Boro,NJ 08872PHYSICALCONNECTIONEnf. Actions by PI<1>department:njdep home|about dep|index by topic|programs/units|dep onlinestatewide:njhome|my new jersey|people|business|government|departments|searchCopyright © State of New Jersey, 1996-2003Department of Environmental ProtectionP. O. Box 402Trenton, NJ 08625-0402Last Updated: August 28, 2003Page 2 of 2NJDEP-OPRA browser base3/6/2010http://datamine2.state.nj.us/DEP_OPRA/OpraMain/pi_main?mode=pi_by_site&sort_order=PI_NAMEA&Select+a+Site:=18747
#### WATSON v. CITY OF HALLANDALE.

No. 36063.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Rehearing Denied April 26, 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 193 So.2d 195.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0795 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2008 - SW - 53 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  Third Quarter 2001 and 2000




                                     Third      Third     Standard    Standard
Area                                quarter    quarter    error on    error on
                                     2001       2000     2001 rate  difference

United States.....................      68.1       67.7        0.2         0.2

  Inside MAs......................      66.3       65.8        0.2         0.3
   In central cities..............      52.3       51.9        0.3         0.5
   Not in central cities (suburbs)      74.7       74.2        0.2         0.3
  Outside MAs.....................      75.5       75.5        0.4         0.5

 Northeast........................      64.1       63.9        0.4         0.6
 Midwest..........................      72.9       72.9        0.4         0.5
 South............................      70.1       69.7        0.3         0.4
 West.............................      63.1       62.2        0.4         0.5
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                         23,935
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               52,376
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 593,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          48,371
<BONDS>                                        532,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,366
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   593,636
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               32,756
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             31,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                214
<INCOME-TAX>                                   88
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            126
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   126
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-35760, 333-41427, 333-71839, 333-91345, 333-67442, 333-68958, 333-107692, 333-112615, 333-148011) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-18385, 33-60071, 333-71797, 333-96173, 333-158504, 333-155771) of Sara LeeCorporation of our report dated August 26, 2009 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August 26, 2009 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

August 26, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I,
Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Robert S. Cubbin
        ----------------

Robert S. Cubbin
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002