alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              THREE MONTHS     NINE MONTHS
                                                  ENDED            ENDED
                                               SEPTEMBER 30,   SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                  1996            1996
                                                  ----            ----
<S>                                          <C>             <C>
EARNINGS PER SHARE:

NET INCOME  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      $   576,000     $ 1,452,000
                                               -----------     -----------
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
  AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD  . . . . . . . .        5,081,608       5,081,608

EFFECT OF SHARES ISSUED  DURING
  THE PERIOD  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           12,852           4,284

EFFECT OF SHARES ISSUABLE UNDER
  STOCK OPTIONS USING THE
  TREASURY STOCK METHOD . . . . . . . . .          365,421         365,411
                                               -----------     -----------
SHARES USED IN COMPUTING
  EARNINGS PER SHARE  . . . . . . . . . .        5,459,881       5,451,303
                                               ===========     ===========
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE . . . . . . . .      $      0.11     $      0.27
                                               ===========     ===========
</TABLE>

(a)   Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are the same.

(b)   Net income per share for the three months and nine months ended September
      30, 1995 has been omitted because  through August 31, 1995 the Combined
      Companies were not a single entity with its own capital structure.





                                       16
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130176 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MAXINE WILSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130176 

 COA: 263890 

WCAC: 03-000246 

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
. 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

xw. ol8ua wolf 

Qowty AuaftNJlr 

~arurda0~~f 

Bl% S&4, Peua 

A 

0 8Oll 

the oumaon 

bwroa 

Ithin th* 

Of our Oon8Situ~ion, 

8 ~OMtitution tin4 the 

U.&h.) 106 S.W. 

.C.A.) 114 S.W. (?a) 

(0.a.A.) 264 8.W. 

73 B.W* 508, xllhc 
&e& euthorltf t0 make there ~-08. 

COMMITTEE
#### Elmer David PLESCOW, Appellant, v. GULF STATES ZAYRE, INC., a Foreign Corporation, and David Birch, Appellees.

No. 77-593.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 25, 1977.

Pozen & Gold and Ira Pozen, Miami, for appellant.

Thornton, Dougherty & Conroy and Bruce F. Simberg, Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Knight, Miami, for appel-lees.

*1148Before HENDRY, C. J., and NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, brought a complaint, as amended, against appellees, defendants below, alleging causes of action for malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and false arrest. After the cause was noticed for a jury trial, the trial court entered an order, along with pre-trial instructions, setting the cause for trial. Among other things, this order directed the parties to appear before the court on November 10, 1976, for call of the trial calendar. At this time, the cause was continued. Subsequently, pursuant to notice, an evi-dentiary hearing on the issue of probable cause was held on February 15, 1977, with counsel for all parties present. During this hearing, the court heard testimony from witnesses, received the deposition testimony of a witness, and heard argument of counsel. Thereafter, the court on February 17, 1977, issued an order titled “Order on Evi-dentiary Hearing and Summary Judgment,” and then, on March 3, 1977, it issued an additional order titled “Final Summary Judgment and Order on Probable Cause Hearing.” From these two orders, appellant brings this appeal.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in issuing the orders of February 17 and March 3, 1977, because they were in violation of Rule 1.510 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Additionally, appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in issuing the orders because, at the time of their issuance, genuine material factual issues existed which precluded the granting of summary judgment.

Appellant’s points are well taken. Rule 1.510 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure sets forth the procedure whereby a trial court can render a summary judgment. This Rule and the case law in Florida make clear that the taking of testimony, passing on the credibility of witnesses, and the determination of genuine material facts cannot be properly accomplished during a hearing for summary judgment. E. g., *Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Eakins,*337 So.2d 418 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); *Megdell v. Wieder,*327 So.2d 781 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); *Norman v. Hawthorne,*321 So.2d 112 (Fla.1st DCA 1975); *Rice*v. *Mercy Hospital,*275 So.2d 566 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); *Coquina Ridge Properties v. East West Company,*255 So.2d 279 (Fla.4th DCA 1971); and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510. The record in the instant case shows that the trial court, when it received and ruled upon the evidence relating to the issue of probable cause, failed to follow the requirements of the principles stated above. Therefore, the orders appealed are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certify that pursuant to theprovisions of 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Hearst-Argyle Television,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at and for the periods indicated.

Dated:  October 27, 2006
|        | By:    | /s/ DAVID  J. BARRETT                           |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | David J. Barrett                                     |
|   | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer                |
|   |   |                                                 |
|   |   |                                                 |
|   | By:    | /s/ HARRY  T. HAWKS                             |
|   | Name:  | Harry T. Hawks                                       |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### James R. CAVANAUGH, Appellant, v. Carol J. CAVANAUGH, Appellee.

No. 69-731.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2011330EN.01S00301.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/s3

---

NOTICE

On 11 November 2011, in Official Journal of the European Union C 328 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 29th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
Memo to the Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0187 – submitted by Karen Hoffman

Topic: American Chemistry Council (ACC) Meeting with EPA

Date: September 17, 2010

Topic: IUR Modification Proposed Rule

Attendees: Robert Kiefer, ACC, Sarah Bronzena, ACC; A.W.Beers, Omnova,Robert W. 

Freerksen, DuPont; Imogene Treble, Dow; Kathleen Roberts, Bergesen & Campbell; Jim Willis, 

EPA; Sara Hisel-McCoy, EPA; Chenise Farquharson, EPA; Karen Hoffman, EPA; Susan 

Sharkey, EPA; Diane Sheridan, EPA.

EPA Meeting with the American Chemistry Council (ACC)

EPA met with American Chemistry Council (ACC) representatives to discuss the IUR Proposed Rule. 

Topics included the timing and scope of the final rule, extension of the comment period in order to allow 

more time to respond to Section 5 and lowering the 300,000 lb threshold for the production and use 

information reporting requirement. ACC inquired about holding an EPA-sponsored public workshop for 

industry to help inform industry’s development of data bases to interface with the electronic Form U. 

Another topic included retrieving industry records of chemical substance formulas that change from year 

to year. 

(See attachments)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          56,289
<SECURITIES>                                    68,542
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,382
<PP&E>                                          18,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,984)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,035
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,242
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   387
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,783)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.51)     
        

</TABLE>
#### James Thomas LOWE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-712.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                         CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
                                EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN
                               (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED
                           EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 1989)



               The Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation Employee Savings

          Plan is hereby amended as follows:

               1.   The following new Section 7.08 is added to the Plan:

                    "7.08  (a)  During the period from December 6,
               1995 through December 22, 1995, Participants will be
               entitled to make an investment election under the Plan
               in addition to the one quarterly change allowed under
               the Plan.  This election will not be counted as the
               once per quarter change for any Participant who has
               already executed his quarterly change or for any
               Participant who has not yet executed a change during
               that quarter.  

                         (b)  Effective December 26, 1995, the "U.S.
               Government Income Trust Fund" investment option is
               eliminated.  If any Participant who has elected to have
               amounts invested in such Fund does not affirmatively elect
               otherwise, such investment direction will be deemed to be a
               direction to invest in the Stable Value Fund, effective
               December 26, 1995, and the investment of any such amounts,
               and future contributions, if applicable, shall be invested
               instead in the Stable Value Fund."

               2.   Except as hereinabove modified and amended, the Amended

          and Restated Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company hereby executes this Third

          Amendment this 31st day of October, 1995.

          ATTEST:                       CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION



          Mark Dudzik                   By: Frank Livingston
          --------------------------        ------------------------------
                                           Its Vice President<PAGE>
#### In re ESTATE of Annetta F. Causey ARBUCKLE, Deceased. Gordon A. ELFERDINK, Appellant, v. James M. WALLACE, Administrator, C.T.A. d. b. m., of the Estate of Annetta F. Causey Arbuckle, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 73-13.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 11, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
262 La. 1088

#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Dalton A. DIXON et al. Audrey L. WEBSTER et al. v. Dalton A. DIXON et al.

No. 52624.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1972.

In re: The Parish of East Baton Rouge applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 262 So.2d 141.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1993
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,529
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,510
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       406,761
<OTHER-SE>                                       (981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,529
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,305)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,763,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  880,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,698,452
<PP&E>                                       9,497,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,256,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          474,184
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,781,029
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,333,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,256,097
<SALES>                                        818,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               827,924
<CGS>                                          369,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,728,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,472)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (908,702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (908,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (908,702)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### J. C. FONTENOT v. Succession of Robert Glen GARLAND, Hasker Garland and Sandra G. Trahan.

No. 61284.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Succession of Robert Glen Garland, Hasker Garland and Sandra G. Trahan applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal Third Circuit. Parish of Evangeline. 352 So.2d 251. Denied.

TATE, J., would grant the writ,
OFFICE OF THE A7TORNEY GENERAL OF ‘ IX%= **AUSTIN**

HonorableC. J. Wilde 

### c0wp iuait OT Nuecee 

### county Corpus Christl, Texas
Dear Sir: Oplnion~No. O-3956 Re: Commissioners' Court may hire a librarianfor a county law library.
Your request ror the opinion of this departmentas to whr?ther

or not the Commissioners' Court has the authority to hire a librarianto take charge of a oounty law library to be established

under the terms and provisionsof Rouse Bill 1080, Acts of the 47th Legislature,is acknowledged.

House Bill 108C, supra,provides in part: "seatlon1. The Commissioners Courts of all countieswithin this State, having a population of not lees than eighty thousand (80,000) inhabitants

nor more than two hundred and twentyfive thousand (225 000)~ inhabitants,

according to the last preOed&g Federal Census, ana in which there is located no Court of Civil Appeals, shall have the power ana authority,by first enteringan order for that purpose, to provide for, maintain and establisha aounty law-library.

"sec. 2. For the Durpose of es,tablishing 'CountyLaw Libraries'after the Bntpy of such order, there shall be taxed, 

### 00ueOt9a ana paid as other oosts the sum of One Dollar ($1) in each oase, civil or criminal, exoept suits for delinquenttaxes, hereafter filed in every County or districtCourt; providedhowever, that in ,noevent shall the county be liable for aafd costs in any case. such coats &al& be colleated by'the Clerks bP the SLespWtlveCourta?HonorableC. J. Wilde, Page 2

in said counties and gala by said Clerk to the County Treasurerto be kept by said 'Treasurer

in a separate fund to be known asp the *CountyLaw Library Fund*. Such fund shsll be administered by said Courts for the purchaseand ma5nteuanceof a law library in a oonvenientand accessibleplace, ana said 

### runa shall not be usea for any other pumose. 'Sea. 3. &ii& COUrtei ar0 6rMted all necessarypower and authority to maka this Aot effective to make reasonablerules in regwa to said library and the use of the books thereof, and to oarry out the terms and provisione of thie Aot.

“.

. . n
It clearlyappears from Section 3 of the Aot, takea in conjunotion

with the last aentenoeappearingin Seotion l? thereof, that the Commissioners 1 Court 5s given broad power to establishand.maintain suoh librar&i~s

U the Comm5ee50nerst Court, therefore,deteneinesthat a laxlibrary eahnot be suoceeefully maintainsdw5thout hfring a~librariancharged w5th the responeibil5ty of kosping and ptioteoting the books, we think it alearlyw5tM.n its power to hire a,llbrarian and to provide ror h5a oompemation to be paid out of the Wounty I,RW Library Fund* createdby Section S of the above Aot.
Yours very tNly

Lloyd Amstrong Assistant