1 SUPPORTING STATEMENT NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (NESHAP) FOR CLAY CERAMICS MANUFACTURING AND GLASS

MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES

PART A 1.0 Identification of the Information Collection (a) Title and Numb er of the Information Collection.

“NESHAP for Clay

Ceramics Manufacturing , Glass Manufacturing , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing Area Sources (40 CFR part 63, subparts RRRRRR, and SSSSSS, TTTTTT) (Final Rule) .” This is a new information collection request (I CR) , and the EPA tracking number i s 2274.02

. (b) Short Characterization. This I CR covers information collection requirements in the final area source rule s for C lay C eramics M anufacturing ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart RRRRRR) , Glass Manufacturi ng (40 CFR part 63, subpart SSSSS) , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing (40 CFR part 63, subpart TTTTTT)

. The p otential respondents are owners or operators of any existing or new clay

ceramics manufacturing facility, glass manufacturing facility, o r secondary nonferrous metals processing facility that is an area source of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emissions

. There are an estimated 5 1 facilities subject to the NESHAP for the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing area source category, an estimated 21 faci lities subject to the NESHAP for the Glass Manufacturing area source category, and an estimated 10 facilities subject to the NESHAP for the Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing area source category

. The affected source at a clay ceramics facility includ es all kilns that fire glazed ceramic ware and all glaze spray booths that use an atomizing (spray

) application technique

. The affected source s at a glass manufacturing facility
are the continuous glass m elti ng furnace s . The affected source at a secondar y nonferrous metals processing facility

is the collection of all furnace melting operations and crushing and screening operations (if applicable) located at a secondary nonferrous metals processing facility

. Clay2

ceramics , glass manufacturing , and secondary nonferrous metals processing facilities are currently well

- controlled in terms of urban metal HAP emissions as a result of State and national standards, permitting requirements, and management practices already taken by the industry to reduce urban metal HAP

. Under the final Clay

Ceramics Manufacturing area source rule, affected sources will be subject to a series of equipment standards and/or management practices . Affected sources will be required to maintain the peak temperature of kilns that fire glazed ceramic ware below 1 5 40°C (2 8 00°F) and either use natural gas, or an equivalent clean

- burning fuel (e.g., propane) , as the kiln fuel ; alternatively, a ffected sources w ill have the option of using an electric

- powered kiln. Affected sources will also be required to maintain annual wet glaze usage records to document whether the facility ’s wet glaze usage is above or below 250 ton s per year (tpy )

. Affected sources located at a facility that uses more than 250 tpy of wet glaze will be required to route
em issions from their glaze spray booths to an air pollution control device (APCD ) and operate and maintain the APCD according to the equipment manufacturer’s specifications ; alternatively, affected sources could u se glazes containing less than 0.1 (weight) p ercent HAP metals

. Affected sources located at a facility that uses 250 tpy

or less of wet glaze will be required to employ waste minimization practices (e.g., high

- volume, low

- pressure (HVLP) spray equipment); alternatively, affected sources could comply with the equipment standard or management practice listed for facilities using more than 250 tpy of wet glaze

. C ompliance requirements for clay ceramics facilities include conducting daily check s of the kiln peak firing temperature ; conducting initial and periodic control device inspections , conducting daily

visible emissions (VE) tests , or complying with EPA

- approved alternative monitoring requirements for glaze spray booths; submitting initial notification s of applicability and comp liance status ; and mai ntaining records of monitoring and inspection data and notifications submitted to EPA

. Existing and n ew sources will also be subject to requirements in the General Provisions (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A) , as specifically noted. Under the final Glass Manufa cturing area source rule , owners and operators of continuous glass m elting furnaces that produce at least 50 tpy of glass containing one or more HAP metal compounds as raw materials w ill be required to meet emission limits. Owners and operators of3

affecte d furnaces w ill be required to conduct a one

- time performance test on each affected furnace to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits. However, if the furnace had been tested within the previous 5 years and the test demonstrated compliance with the emission limits in the final Glass Manufacturing area source rule, no additional testing will be required. Owners and operators will be allowed to demonstrate compliance for identical furnaces by testing only one of the furnaces. For any existing affec ted furnace that is controlled with an electrostatic precipitator (ESP), the final rule also w ill require monitoring of secondary voltage and electrical current to each field of the ESP. For any existing affected furnace that is controlled with a fabric f ilter, the final rule also w ill require monitoring of the fabri c filter inlet temperature. The required monitoring must be performed any time the affected furnace is producing glass that is charged with one or more of the glass manufacturing metal HAP and also during all transition phases from glass containing metal HAP to glass that does not contain metal HAP (i.e., until all HAP

containing glass has left the furnace melter). The rule will require monitoring systems to measure the appropriate parameter at least every 15 minutes, and the average value w ill have to be recorded at least once every 8

- hour shift. For any

new affected furnace controlled with an ESP, the owner or operator w ill have to install a continuous parameter monitoring system (CPMS) that continuously measures and records the secondary voltage and electrical current to each field of the E S P. For any new affected furnace controlled with a fabric filter, the owner or operator w ill have to install a bag leak detection system. Owners and operators of any affected existing or new furnaces also w ill be required to conduct annual inspections of furnace emission control devices and monitoring systems. The final Glass Manufacturing area source rule w ill require affected facilities to submit
an Ini tial N otification and a Notice of Compliance Status. Affected facilities also w ill be required to keep records of glass production and control device and monitoring system operation and maintenance activities , including annual inspections

. Under the final Secondary Nonferrous Metals area source rule, affected sources will be required to install a capture system that collects the particulate and fumes released at each crushing and screening operation and duct those emissions to a particulate matter (PM) control4

device that achieves a specified control efficiency or outlet PM concentration . Affected sources will also be required to install, operate, and maintain one or more fabric filter/cartridge collector baghouses on each furnace melting operation. For a new or existing affected source with a crushing or screening operation, the final rule
w ill require a daily

visual inspection, including airflow verification, of the associated capture device. For an existing affected source with furnace melting operation s, the final rule w ill require a daily

visible emissions check or a daily visual bag inspection of each baghouse. For a new affected source with furnace melting operations, the final rule w ill require owners and operators to install, operate, and maintain a bag leak detection system for each baghouse used to comply with the standards. Owners and operators of any new affected source w ill also be required to conduct a daily check of each bag leak detection system. The final rule w ill also require affected facilities to submit initial notifications of applicability and compliance status. Existing and new sources will also be subject to requirements in the General Provisions (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A), as specifically noted. The information collection requirements for existing and new sources in the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing , Glass Manufacturing , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing source categories are listed in Attachment s 1 A , 1 B , and 1C

. 2. Need For and Use of the Collection (a) Need/Authority for the Collection

. Section 112 of the C lean Air Act (C AA) require s EPA to establish NESHAP for both major and area sources of HAP that are listed for regulation under CAA section 112(c). An area source is a stationary

source that is not a major source (i.e., an area source does not emit and does not have the potential to emit more than 10 t py of any single HAP and more than 25 t py of any combination of HAP )

. Requirements for area sources in CAA sections 112(c) (3) and 112(k) direct EPA to (1) identify at least 30 air toxics that p resent the greatest potential health threat in the largest number of urban areas and (2) to identify sufficient area source categories to ensure that sources representing 90 percent or more of the of the emissions of the 30 “lis ted” HAP are subject to regulation . EPA implements these requirements through the Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy

(64 FR 38715, July

19, 1999). EPA added Glass Manufacturing and Secondary5

Nonferrous Metals to the Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy area source category list on June 26, 2002 (67 FR 43112) and added C lay P roducts M anufacturing on November 22, 2002 (67 FR 70428). The Clay Products Manufacturing area source category was later split into the two categories of Brick and Structural Clay P roducts (BSCP) Manufacturing and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing to better match the categories already scheduled to be regulated by major source NESHAP. The Clay

Ceramics Manufacturing area source category is being addressed in the area
source rule currently being issued , while the BSCP Manufacturing area source category will be addressed in a future action. The initial listing of the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing area source category was based on emissions of chromium, manganese, nickel, and lead , while the i nitial listing of the Glass Manufacturing area source category was based on emissions of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese, and nickel

. The initial listing of the Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing area source category was based on emissions of arsenic, chromium, lead, manganese, mercury, and nickel. Each of these HAP metals is on the list of 30 HAP identified in the 1999 strategy

. Under CAA section 112(d)(5), EPA may elect to promulgate HAP standards for area sources based on the use of generally available control technology (GACT) or management practices used by

the sources

. EPA can consider costs and economic impacts in determining GACT, which is particularly important when developing regulations for source categories that may have few e stablishments and many small businesses, or when determining whether additional control is needed for sources that are already well

- controlled as a result of other air emissions standards. Certain records and reports are nec essary for the Administrator to confir m the compliance status of area sources , identify any new or reconstructed s ources subject to the standards, and confirm that the standards are being achieved on a continuous basis. These recordkeeping and reporting requirements are specifically authorized by

section 114 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7414) and set out in the part 63 NESHAP General Provisions

. The recordkeeping and reporting requirements for title V permits are contained in 40 CFR 70.6 and 40 CFR 71.6. Under parts 63 and 70 or 71 , the owner or operator must keep each record for 5 years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record.6

(b) Use/Users of the Data. The information will be used by the delegated authority (State agency

or Regional Administrator if there is no delegated State agency ) to ensure that the standards and other requirements are being achieved. Based on review of the recorded information at the site and the reported information, the delegated permitting authority can identify facilities that may

not be in compliance and decide which facilitie s, records, or processes may need inspection

. 3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria (a) Nonduplication. A computer search of EPA ’ s on going I CRs revealed no duplication of information

gathering efforts. (b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB. An announcement of a public comment period for this I CR was published as part of the proposed rulemaking. (c) Consultation s. The final rule s were developed in consultation with individual companies , State agencies, and trade association s . The non

- EPA persons consulted on the information collection activities are identified in Table 1. TABLE 1. PERSONS CONSULTED ON THE INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITIES

Contact Applicable

subpart Organization Telephone n umber Greg Andrews Subpart

RRRRRR R.T. Vanderbilt Co., Ceramic Manufacturers of

America (CerMA) (203) 853

- 1400 Eric Astrachan Tile Council of North America (TCNA) (864) 646

- 8453 Todd Barson Ferro Corp., CerMA (216) 750

- 6432 Mike Cassidy Kohler Co. (920) 457

- 4441, ext. 77263 Bob Hurt Dal

- Tile Corp. (214) 309

- 4891 Myra Warne Society of Glass and Ceramic Decorators, C erMA (740) 588

- 9882 Steve Wi e derwax American Marazzi Tile, Inc. (972) 2 26

- 0110 John Brown Subpart

SSSSSS Glass Manufacturing Industry Council (GMIC) (614) 818

- 9423 Marshall Bullard Automotive Components Holdings Joe Kane Corning Inc

. (607) 974

- 9000 Kurt Kissling P epper Hamilton LLP (313) 393

- 73137

Contact Applicable

subpart Organization Telephone n umber Patricia Pride PPG Industries, Inc. (412) 492

- 5278 Phil Ross Glass Packaging Institute (GPI) (949) 493

- 7293 Pamela Rygalski Pilkington NA (910) 276

- 5630 Michael Turnbull Guardian Industries (248) 340

- 2227 John Bullock Subpart

TTTTTT International Precious Metals Institute (203) 784

- 3181 Merideth Curren Pease & Curren, Inc. (401) 739

- 6350 Roger Fumey Atlas Pacific Corporation (909) 421

- 1200 Christopher Kiser Magretech, Inc. (216) 518

- 9165 James Mallory Non

- Ferrous Founders’ Socie ty (847) 299

- 0950 George Phillips Sipi Metals Corp. (773) 276

- 0070 Charles Tatakis Metalor Technologies USA Refining Corp. (508) 699

- 8800, ext. 224 (d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection. If the relevant information were collected less frequently, the delegated permitting authority (State or EPA) would not be reasonably assured that a facility is in compliance with the standards. (e) General Guidelines

. None of the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6 are being exceeded. (f) Confidentiality. All informatio n submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart B

-- Confidentiality

of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1 , 1976; amended by

43 FR 39999, September 28, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 28, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). (g) Sensitive Questions. This I CR does not involve matters of a sensitive nature. 4. The Respondents and the Information Requested (a) Respondents/NAIC S Codes

. Potential respondents under S ubpart RRRRRR are owners or operators of any existing or
new clay ceramics manufacturing facility that is an area source o f HAP emissions

. The North American Industry

Classification System (NAI CS ) code s for clay ceramics manufacturing are8

3271 11, 327 11 2, and 3271 2 2

. There are an estimated 5 1 facilities subject to the NESHAP for the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing area source category ; no new clay ceramics area so urces are expected during the 3- ye ar period of this I CR. Potential respondents under Subpart SSSSSS are owners or operators of any existing or
new glass manufacturing facility that is an area source o f HAP emissions. The NAI CS code s for glass manufacturing are 327211 , 327212 , and 327213

. There are an estim ated 21 facil ities subject to the NESHAP for the Glass Manufacturing area source category ; no new glass area
so urces are expected to be affected sources during the 3- ye ar period of this I CR. Potential respondents under Subpart TTTTTT are owner s or o perators of any existing or new secondary

nonferrous metal s processing facility that is an area source of HAP emissions and emits arsenic, chromium, lead, manganese, or nickel . The NAI CS code for secondary nonferrous metal s processing is 331492. This are a source category was originally

established under SI C code 3341, a broader classification which included brass and bronze ingot makers. The corresponding NAI CS code for brass and bronze ingot makers is 331423. There are an estimated 10 facilities subjec t to the NESHAP for the Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing area source category ; no new secondary nonferrous metals area sources are expected during the 3

- ye ar period of this I CR. (b) Information Requested. (i) Data Items, Including Recordkeeping Requirements. Attachment s 1 A ,1 B , and 1C, In formation Requirements, summarize the data items, including recordkeeping and reporting requirements , for the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing , Glass Manufacturing , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing area source categories

. (ii) Respondent Activities. The respondent activities required by the final Clay

Ceramics Manufacturing , Glass Manufacturing , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing rules are identified in Table s 2 A , 2B , and 2C an d are introduced in sec tion 6(a). 5. The Information Collected

–Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management (a) Agency Activities.9

The Agency

activities associated with the final Clay Ceramics Manufacturing , Glass Manufacturing , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing rules are provided in Table s 3 A , 3B , and 3C and are introduced in section 6(c). (b) Collection Methodology and Management

. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs of the delegated permitting authority . The notifications of compliance status and monitoring records required under the final rules are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations. EPA is the permitting authority until the State agency

is delegated authority

to implement the final rule s . Therefore, i nformation contained in the reports submitted to the Regional Administrator will be entered into the Air Facility System (AFS), which is operated and maintained by

EPA ’ s Office of Compliance. AFS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by

local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated a

uthorities can edit, store, retrieve and analy ze the data. (c) Small Entity Flexibility. The Small Business Administration defines a small entity as a firm having no more than 500 to 750 employees for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing , less than 750 to 1,000 employees for Glass Manufacturing, and less than 750 employees for Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing depen ding on the size definition for the affected NAI CS code

. There will not be adverse impacts on any small entities in the C lay C eramics Manufacturing , Glass Manufacturing , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing area source categories . The final Clay Ceramics Manufacturing rule do es not create any

new requirements or burdens for existing sources other than minimal notification requirements . The final Glass Manufacturing rule w ill require additional costs for 2 1 glass manufacturing facilities , but only three of those facilities w ill be expected to install control devices and incur costs beyond those associated with annual inspections of control devices; only

one of these facilities is a small business. The final Secondary Nonferrous Metals10

Processing rul e does not create any new requirements or burdens for existing sources other than minimal notification requirements. (d) Collection Schedule

. The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown in Table s 2 A , 2B , and 2C for the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing , Glass Manufacturing , and Secondary

Nonferrous Metals Processing area source categories

. 6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection (a) Estimating Respondent Burden. The annual burden estimates for the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP , Glass Manufacturing NESHAP , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing NESHAP are shown in Table s 2 A , 2B , and 2C

. These numbers were derived from estimates based on EPA’s experience with other standards. No burden estimates are provided for new area sources because no new facilities are expected to become affected sources during the 3

- ye ar period of this I CR. (b) Estimating Respondent Costs. The information collection activities for the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP , Glass Manu facturing NESHAP , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing NESHAP are presented in Table s 2 A , 2B , and 2C

. Because the data are already collected by

respondents as required by the existing permit requirements , no respondent development costs are associat ed with the information collection activities. (i) Estimating Labor Costs . L abor rates and associated costs are based on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data. Technical, management, and clerical average hourly rates for private industry workers were taken from the United States Department of L abor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2005 , “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group” available at http://www.bls.gov/news.rel ease/ecec.t02.htm . Wages for occupational groups are used as the basis for the labor rates with a total compensation of $4 1

. 89 /hour for technical, $4 8

. 09 /hour for managerial, and $20. 86 /hour for clerical. These rates represent salaries plus fringe benef

its and do not include the cost of overhead. An overhead rate of 110 percent is used to account for these costs. The fully

- burdened hourly wage rates used to represent respondent la bor costs are: technical at $87.98 , management at $100. 98 , and clerical at $43. 80

.11

(ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance (O& M) Costs

. Although the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP includes requirement s for facilities to install and operate control devices , HVLP spray

equipment, and monitoring systems , it has been determined that existing clay ceramics facilities are already in compliance with the requirements of the final NESHAP

. Capital and O&M costs were not estimated for new sources because no new sources are expected during the next 3

- ye ar period. Therefore, n o (zero) capital and O&M costs are associated with the final Clay

Ceramics NESHAP during the 3

- ye ar period of this I CR. The capital costs associated with the information collection requirements of the final Glass Manufacturing NESHAP w ill include the co sts to purchase and install monitoring systems, conduct performance tests , and purchase file cabinets for keeping records. Monitoring systems
w ill need to be installed on three existing furnaces that w ill be subject to the rule and w ill require emission c ontrols to meet the emission limits. We estimate that one of the new control systems
w ill be an ESP and w ill require systems to monitor secondary voltage and electrical current to each field of the ESP. We estimate that fabric filters will be installed o n the other two existing furnaces that w ill need emission controls to meet the standard; for the fabric filters, systems for monitoring inlet temperature will be required. The final rule w ill require a one

- time performance test on each affected furnace. However, this requirement w ill be waived if the furnace had been tested within the previous 5 ye ars , and the test demonstrated compliance with the emission limit in the final Glass Manufacturing Area Source NESHAP. We assumed that performance tests
w ill b e required on ly

on the three existing affected furnaces installing a control device . The O&M costs associated with the final Glass Manufacturing NESHAP include the costs of conducting annual inspections of control systems on affected sources. It is assum ed that there are a total of 27 affected sources at the 2 1 f acilities subject to the final Glass Manufacturing NESHAP and that 1 3 of the 27 affected sources can meet the required emission limit without a control device . Therefore, it is assumed that these control device inspections w ill be conducted
on each of the remaini ng 14 affec ted furnaces annually

. Although the final Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing NESHAP includes requirements for facilities to install and operate capture devices, control devices, and monitoring systems, it has been determined that existing secondary nonferrous metals facilities are already in12

compliance with the requirements of the final NESHAP. Capital and O&M costs were not estimated for new sources because no new sources are expected during the next 3

- ye ar period. Therefore, no (zero) capital and O&M costs are associated with the final Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing NESHAP during the 3

- ye ar period of this I CR. (i ii ) Annualizing Capital Costs

. No capital costs are associated with the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP or the final Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing NESHAP

. Therefore, no (zero) annualized capital costs are associated with the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP or the final Secondary

Nonferrous Metals Process ing NESHAP during the 3

- ye ar period of this I CR. For the final Glass Manufacturing NESHAP, the annualized capital costs include the costs for monitoring systems, performance tests , and file cabinets. (c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

. Because the in formation collection requirements were developed as an incidental part of standards development, no costs can be attributed to the development of the information collection requirements. Because reporting and recordkeeping requirements on the part of the respondents are required under the operating permits rules in 40 CFR part 70 or part 71 and the part 63 NESHAP General Provisions, no operational costs w ill be incurred by the Federal Government. Publication and distribution of the information are part of the Compliance Data System, with the result that no Federal costs can be directly attributed to the I CR. Examination of records to be maintained by the respondents will occur incidentally as part of the periodic inspection of sources that is part of EPA’ s overall compliance and enforcement program, and, therefore, is not attributable to the I CR. The only costs that the Federal government w ill incur are user costs associated with the analysis of the reported information, as presented in Table s 3 A , 3B , and 3C for Clay

Ceramics Manufacturing , Glass Manufacturing , and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing

. The Agency

labor rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2006 General Schedule which excludes locality rates of pay . These rates can be obtained from Salary Table 200 6

- GS available on the OPM website, http://www.opm.gov/oca/06tables/html/gs_h.asp

. The government employee labor rates are $14. 35 /hour for clerical (GS

- 6, Step 3), $2 6

. 53 for technical (GS

- 12, Step 1), and $35. 75 /hr for management (GS

- 13, Step 5). These rates were13

increased by

60 percent to include fringe benefits and overhead. The fully

- burdened wage rates used to represent Agency labor costs are: clerical at $22

. 96 ; technical at $4 2 .4 5, and management at $57.20

. (d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

. There are an estimated 5 1 existing facilities subject to the C lay C eramics M anufacturing
area source NESHAP . No new sources are expecte d during the next 3 years. Consequently, the average number of Clay

Ceramics respondents during the 3

- ye ar period of this I CR is 1 7

. There are an estimated 21 existing glass manu facturing area source facilities that w ill be subject to the final rule , and none of the new glass manufacturing facilities expected to begin operations during the next 3 years are expected to be subject to the rule

. Therefore, the average number of Glass Manufacturing respondents during the 3

- ye ar period of this I CR is 7

. There are an estimated 10 existing facilities subject to the Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing area source NESHAP. No new sources are expected during the next 3 years. Consequently, the average number of Secondary

Nonferrous Metals respondents during the 3

- ye ar period is 3. The only components of the total annual responses attributable to this I CR for the Clay Ceramics NESHAP and the Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing NESHAP are one - time initial notification s o f applicability and compliance status for each existing facility

. For the final Glass Manufacturing NESHAP , the components of the total annual responses attributable to this IC R are one

- time initial notifications and one

- time notifications of compliance status for the 2 1 facilities that w ill be subject to the rule. The number of total annual responses for subpart RRRRRR is estimated as: 34 ( 1 7 annual average respondents × 2 notification s ). The number of total annual responses for subpart SSSSSS is estimated as: 14 ( 7 annual average respondents × 2 notifications ). The number of total annual responses for subpart TTTTTT is estimated as: 6 (3 annual average respondents × 2 notifications ). (e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables. (i) Respondent tally. The bottom line respondent burden h ours and costs, presented in Table s 2 A , 2B , and 2C are calculated by adding person

- hours per year down each column for technical, managerial, and clerical staff, and by adding down the cost column.14

The average annual burden for the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements in subpart RRRRRR for the 5 1 existing facilities subject to the C lay Ceramics M anufacturing
area source NESHAP is 196 person - hours , with an annual average cost of $ 16,560 and no capital and O&M costs. The average annual burden for the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements in subpart SSSSSS for the 21 existing glass manufacturing area source s is 190 person - hours , with an annual average cost of $ 16,126 and annualized capital and O&M costs of $ 12,964

. The average annual burden for the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements in part TTTTTT for the 10 existing facilities subject to the Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing area source NESHAP is 15 person

- hours, with an annual average cost of $1,299 and no capital and O&M costs. The total annual burden for the three source categories i s 401 hours at $ 33,985 , wi th annualized capital and O&M costs of $ 12,964

. (ii) The Agency tally. The average annual Federal Go vernment cost is $ 4 ,85 6 for 117 hours for subpart RRRRRR , $ 3,261 for 6 7 hours for subpart SSSSSS , and $ 318 for 7 hours for subpart TTTTTT . The total annual Federal Government cost associated with the three final rules is $ 8, 435 for 1 9 1 total annual hours. The bottom line Agency burden hours and co sts presented in Table s 3 A , 3B , and 3C for the three final rules are calculated by adding person

hours per year down each column for technical, managerial, and clerical staff, and by adding down the cost column. (iii) Variations in the annual bottom lin e. This section does not apply since no significant variation is anticipated. (f) Reasons for Change in Burden. This section does not apply because this is a new I CR. (g) Burden Statement The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this c ollection of information is estimated to average 6 hours per response for the NESHAP for clay ceramics manufacturing
area sources , 14 hours per response for the NESHAP for glass manufacturing area sources , and 3 hours per response for the NESHAP for second ary nonferrous metals processing area sources.15

Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency . This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verify ing information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing w ays to comply with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA ’ s regulations in 40 CFR part 63 are listed in 40 CFR part 9. To comment on the Agency ’s need for this information the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggestions for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID No s . EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2006

- 0 424 (Clay Ceramics) , EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2006

- 0360 (Glass) , and EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 200 6

- 0940 (Secondary Nonferrous Metals) which are available for online viewing at http://www.regulations.gov , or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket and In formation Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566

- 1742

. An e lectronic version of the public do cket is avai lable at http://www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket th at are available electronically . When in the system, select “search,” then key in one of the Docket ID Number s identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17 th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the relevant EPA16

Docket ID Number ( EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2006

- 0 424 , EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2006

- 0360 , or EPA

- HQ

- OAR

200 6

- 0940 ) and OMB Control Number 2060

-NEW in any c orrespondence. PART B This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used in data collection associated with the final rules

.17

TABLE 2 A . ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST
-- NESHAP FOR CLAY CERAMICS MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES

Burden item (A) Person
hours per occurrence (B) No. of

occurrences per respondent (C) Person
hours per respondent (C=A*B) (D)

Respondents per year a (E)

Technical person hours per year (E=C*D) (F)

Management person - hours per year (E*0.05) (G) Clerical

person - hours per year (E*0.1) (H) Cost b , $ 1 . Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems N/A 4. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructions 4 1 4 17 68 3.4 6.8 $ 6, 624 B. Required ac tivities Initial notification of applicability 2 1 2 17 34 1.7 3.4 $ 3, 312 Notification of compliance status 4 1 4 17 68 3.4 6.8 $ 6, 624 C. Create information See 4B D. Gather existing information See 4B E. Write report See 4B 5. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read instructions See 4A B. Plan activities See 4A C. Implement activities See 4A D. Record data c N/A E. Time to transmit or disclose information c N/A F. Time to train personnel c N/A G. Time for audits c N/A TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST 196 h ours $ 16,560 N/A = not applicable.
a There are an estimated 5 1 existing clay ceramics facilities subject to the area source NESHAP . No new source s are projected during the 3

- year term of this ICR. Therefore, the average number of respondents per year is 1 7 ( 5 1 ÷3= 17 ). b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $100.98 for managerial labor, $87.98 for technical labor, and $43.80 for clerical la bor. These rates are from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2005, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. The rates are from column 1, Total compensation. The r ates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. c No hours or costs are associated with this item because the rule imposes no additional burden for th is item.18 TABLE 2B . ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST
-- NESHAP FOR GLASS MANU FACTURING AREA SOURCES

Burden item (A) Person
hours per occurrence (B) No. of

occurrences per respondent (C) Person
hours per respondent (C=A*B) (D)

Respondents per year (E)

Technical person - hours per year (E=C*D) (F)

Management person - hours per year (E* 0.05) (G) Clerical

person - hours per year (E*0.1) (H) Cost, $ a 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Acquis., Install., and Util. of Technology and Systems N/A 4. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructio ns b 2 1 2.0 7.0 14.0 0.7 1.4 $1,364 B. Required activities Initial notification of applicabilityc 2 1 2.0 7.0 14.0 0.7 1.4 $1,364 Notification of compliance status d 4 1 4.0 7.0 28.0 1.4 2.8 $2,727 C. Create information See 4B D. Gather existing information See 4B E. Write report See 4B 5. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read instructions e 2 1 2.0 7.0 14.0 0.7 1.4 $1,364 B. Plan activities See 5E C. Implement activities See 5E D. Record dataf 0.1 1,095 109.5 0 0 0 0 $ 0 E. Time to transmit or disclose information g 0.25 3.3 0.8 14.0 11.6 0.6 1.2 $1,125 F. Time to train personnel h 12 1 12.0 7.0 84.0 4.2 8.4 $8,182 G. Time for audits N/A TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST 190 hours $ 16,126 TOTAL NUMBER OF ANNUAL RESPONSES i 14 ANNUAL CAPITAL COSTS Performance tests j $ 8,740 Monitoring equipmentk $ 5,603 File cabinets l $1,645 Total annual capital $ 15,988 ANNUALIZED CAPITAL COSTS m Perfo rmance tests (5 yr life, 7% interest; CRF =0.2439) $ 2,130 Monitoring equipment ( 10 yr life, 7% interest; CRF =0.1424) $ 800 File cabinets (15 yr life, 7% interest; CRF =0.1098) $ 1 8 0 Total annualized capital $ 3,110 TOTAL ANNUAL COST S (O&M) n $ 9,854 TOTAL ANNUALIZED COSTS (Annualized capital + O&M costs) $ 12,96419

N/A = not applicable.
a This ICR uses the following labor rates: $100.98 for managerial labor, $87.98 for technical labor, and $43.80 for clerical la bor. These rates are from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2005, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. The rates are from column 1, Total compensation. The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. b There are an estimated 21 existing glass manufacturing facilities that use HAP metals and no new facilities are expected; the average number expected to read the rule during the 3

- yr ICR clearan ce period is 21 /3 = 7. c Each of the 21 existing noted above would be required to submit an Initial Notification

. d The estimated 2 1 existing plants that use HAP compounds as raw materials and would be required to submit Notifications of Compliance Statu s, f or an average of 2 1 /3 = 7 per year for the 3

- yr ICR compliance period

. e The estimated 21 existing plants would be required to keep records of the n otification s and other records, or an average of 2 1 /3 = 7 per year during the 3

- yr ICR compliance perio d

. f It is assumed that 1 3 of the 27 affected furnaces can meet the emission limit without installation of a control device. It is assumed that each of the remaining 1 4 affected furnaces have automatic monitoring and recording systems. g Transmittals wi ll include Initial Notifications for 21 plants and Notifications of Compliance Status for 21 plants, for an average of (21+21)/3 = 14 for each year of the 3

- yr ICR clearance period

. h Training will be required for one person at each of the 21 affected plants or an average of 21/3=7 per year over the 3

- yr clearance period. i The total annual number of responses is calculated by summing the product of columns B and D for each of the reports listed i n 4E. j Assumes emission tests will be conducted on 3 furn ace control systems or 3 /3 = 1. 0 affected sources per year using Method 5 at an average cost of $8,740 per test. k Monitoring equipment will be needed for the 3 new emission control systems: 1 system for monitoring ESP voltage and current at $9,570 per s ystem, and 2 systems for monitoring fabric filter inlet temperature at $3,620 per system; an average of 1 system will be installed per year during the 3

- yr ICR clearance period. l Assumes one standard four

- drawer file cabinet for each of the 21 facilities , or an average of 21/3=7 per year required to maintain records at a cost of $235 per cabinet.
m Annualized costs are calculated by multiplying the capital recovery factor (CRF) by the capital cost. CRF=(i)* (1+i)^t/((1+i) ^t

- 1) where i = interest rate (%) and t = equipment life (years)

. n Costs of annual inspections of emission control systems , assuming 8 hr per inspection for each of the 14 affected furnaces with a control device

.20 TABLE 2C . ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST
-- NESHAP FOR SECONDARY NONFERROUS METALS PROCESSING AREA SOURCES

Burden item (A) Person
hours per occurrence (B) No. of

occurrences per respondent (C) Person
hours per respondent (C=A*B) (D)

Respondents per year a (E)

Technical person hours per year (E=C*D) (F)

Manag em ent person - hours per year (E*0.05) (G) Clerical

person - hours per year (E*0.1) (H) Cost b , $ 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems N/A 4. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructions 2 1 2 3 7 0.3 0.7 $649 B. Required activities Initial notification of applicability 1 1 1 3 3 0.2 0.3 $325 Notification of compliance status 1 1 1 3 3 0.2 0.3 $325 C. Create info rmation See 4B D. Gather existing information See 4B E. Write report See 4B 5. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read instructions See 4A B. Plan activities See 4A C. Implement activities See 4A D . Record data c N/A E. Time to transmit or disclose information c N/A F. Time to train personnel c N/A G. Time for audits c N/A TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST 15 h ours $1,299 N/A = not applicable.
a There are an estimated 10 existing secondary nonferrous metals processing facilities subject to the area source NESHAP . No new sources are projected during the 3

- year term of this ICR. Therefore, the average number of respondents per year is 3 ( 10 ÷3= 3 ). b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $100.98 for managerial labor, $87.98 for technical labor, and $43.80 for clerical labor. These rates are from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2005, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. The rates are from column 1, Total compensation. The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. c No hours or costs are associated with this item because the rule imposes no additional burden for th is item.21

TABLE 3 A . ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST TO THE AGENCY
-- NESHAP FOR CLAY CERAMICS MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES

Burden i tem (A) Person
- hours per occurrence (B) Occurrences

per respondent (C) Facilitie s

per year a (D) Technical

p erson hours/year (D =A*B*C) (E) Managem ent

person hours/year (E =0.05*D) (F) Clerical

person hours/year (F =0.1*D) (G) Cost b , $ Report Review: Initial notification of applicability 2 1 17 34 1.7 3. 4 $ 1 ,6 19 N otification of compliance status 4 1 17 68 3. 4 6.8 $ 3, 237 TOTAL BURDEN AND COST 1 17 h ours $ 4 , 85 6

a There are an estimated 5 1 existing clay ceramics manufacturing facilities subject to the area source NESHAP . No new sources are projected during the 3

- year term of this ICR. Therefore , the average number of respondents per year is 1 7 ( 5 1 ÷3= 1 7 ). No travel is expected. b This ICR uses the followin g average hourly labor rates: $ 57

. 20 for managerial (GS

- 13, Step 5, $35. 75 x 1.6), $4 2.45 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $2 6.53 x 1.6) for technical and $22 .96 (G S

6, Step 3, $14.35 x 1.6) for c lerical. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2006 General Schedule , which excludes locality rates of pay

.22 TABLE 3B. ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST TO THE AGENCY
-- NESHAP FOR GLASS MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES

Burden item (A) Person
hours per occurrence (B)

Occurrences per respondent (C) EPA

person hours/year (C=A * B) (D ) Facilities

per year ( E ) Technical

person hours/year ( E =C *D ) ( F ) Managem ent

person hours/year ( F =0.05* E ) ( G) Clerical

person hours/y ear ( G=0.1* E ) ( H) Cost a , $ Attend performance test b 16 1 16 .0 1 .0 16 .0 0.8 1.6 $762 Report Review: Initial notification of applicabilityc 2 1 2 .0 7 .0 14.0 0.7 1.4 $ 666 Notification of performance testd Notification of compliance status e 4 1 4 .0 7 .0 28

. 0 1 .4 2.8 $ 1,333 TOTAL BURDEN AND COST (SALARY) 5 8.0 2.9 5.8 $2, 761 Travel expenses for tests attended f $500 TOTAL BURDEN AND COST 6 7 hours $ 3 , 261

a This ICR uses the following average hourly labor rates: $ 57.20 for managerial (GS

- 13, Step 5, $35.75 x 1.6), $42.45 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $26.53 x 1. 6) for technical and $22.96 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $14.35 x 1.6) for clerical. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2006 General Schedule , which excludes locality rates of pay

. b Assumes Agency personnel will attend the performance test for one affected source per year

. c Assumes 21 existing and no new plants will complete Initial Notifications for an average of 21 /3 = 7 per year during each year of the 3

- yr ICR clearance period. d Not required e Assumes 2 1 existing facilities will submit N otifications of Compliance S tatus for an average of 2 1 /3 = 7 per year of the 3

- yr ICR clearance period

. f Assumes Agency personnel (1 person) will spend 2 days per plant, at $50 pe r diem per day, and $400 transportation expense per round trip to attend performance tests

.23 TABLE 3C. ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST TO THE AGENCY
-- NESHAP FOR SECONDARY NONFERROUS METALS PROCESSING AREA SOURCES

Burden item (A) Person
- hours pe r occurrence (B) Occurrences

per respondent (C) Facilitie s

per year a (D) Technical

person hours/year (D=A*B*C) (E) Managem ent

person hours/year (E=0.05*D) (F) Clerical

person hours/year (F=0.1*D) (G) Cost b , $ Report Review: Initial notification of applicability 1 1 3 3 0.2 0.3 $ 159 Notification of compliance status 1 1 3 3 0.2 0.3 $ 159 TOTAL BURDEN AND COST 7 hours $ 318

a There are an estimated 10 existing secondary nonferrous metals processing facilities subject to the area source NESHAP . No new sources are projected during the 3

- year term of this ICR. Therefore, the average number of respondents per year is 3 ( 10 ÷3= 3 ). No travel is expected. b This ICR uses the following average hourly labor rates: $ 57.20 for managerial (GS

- 13, Step 5, $35.75 x 1.6), $42.45 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $26.53 x 1.6) for technical and $22.96 (GS

6, Step 3, $14.35 x 1.6) for clerical. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2006 General Schedule , which excludes locality rates of pay

.24

AT TACHMENT 1 A . INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
-- NESHAP FOR CLAY CERAMICS MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES

Requirement Citation for existing sources Citation for new sources General Provisions citation Monitoring Kiln peak temperature §63.11440(a) §63.11440(a) NA APCD parameter check NA §63.11440(b)(1) NA Visible emissions test NA §63.11440(b)(2) NA AP CD inspection §63.11440(c)(1) NA NA Alternative monitoring technique Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.11440(c)(2) Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.114 40 (b ) (3) 40 CFR 63.8(f)

Notifications Notification of applicability Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.11442(a) Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.11442(a) 40 CFR 63.9(a)(2) Notification of construction/reconstruction NA NA 40 CFR 63.9(b)(5) Notification of special comp liance requirements Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR 40 CFR 63.9(d) Notification of performance test NA NA 40 CFR 63.9( e ) Notification of opacity/VE observations NA NA 40 CFR 63.9(f) Additional CMS notifications NA NA 40 CFR 63.9(g) Notification of compliance status Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.11442(b) Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.11442(b) 40 CFR 63.9(h) Notification of changes in information Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR 40 CFR 63.9(j)

Plans SSM pl an NA NA 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) Performance test plan NA NA 40 CFR 63.7(c)(2) CMS quality control plan NA NA 40 CFR 63.8(d) CMS performance evaluation test plan NA NA 40 CFR 63.8(e)(3)

Records Records of notifications Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / 63.1144 3(a)(1) Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / 63.11443(a)(1) 40 CFR 63.10 M onitoring/inspection information Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / 63.11443(a)(2) Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / 63.11443(a)(2) 40 CFR 63.10

Reports Reports of deviation NA NA NA Semiannual mon itoring reports NA NA NA Initial/repeat performance tests NA NA 40 CFR 63.7(e)(1) / 40 CFR 63.6(h)(7) Quality assurance test plan NA NA 40 CFR 63.7(c) CMS performance evaluation/report NA NA 40 CFR 63.8(e)(5) SSM reports NA NA 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) Exces s emissions reports NA NA 40 CFR 63.10(e)(3)25 ATTACHMENT 1 B . INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
-- NESHAP FOR GLASS MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES Requirement Citation for existing sources Citation for new sources Part 63 General Provisions citation Monitoring Furnace ESP secondary voltage and current §63.11454(b) §63.1145 4 ( d) N/A Furnace fabric filter inlet temperature §63.11454(c) §63.1145 4 ( e ) N/A

Notifications Notification of applicability §63.11456(a) §63.11456(a) 40 CFR 63.9(b ) Notification of construc tion/reconstruction N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.9(b)(5) Notification of special compliance requirements N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.9(d) Notification of performance test N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.9(e ) Notification of opacity/VE observations N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.9(f) Additional CMS notifications N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.9(g) Notification of compliance status §63.11456(b) §63.11456(b) 40 CFR 63.9(h) Notification of changes in information N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.9(j)

Plans SSM plan N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) Performance test plan N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.7(c)(2) CMS quality control plan N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.8(d) CMS performance evaluation test plan N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.8(e)(3)

Records Records of notifications §63.11457(a)(1) §63.11457(a)(1) 40 CFR 63.10 Records of startups, shutdowns and malfunct ions N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.10 Records that demonstrate continuous compliance §63.11457(a)(3) §63.11457(a)(3) 40 CFR 63.10 Records of glass production §63.11457(a)(4) §63.11457(a)(4) 40 CFR 63.10 M onitoring/inspection information §63.11457(a)(5)

- (8), §63.1 1457(c) §63.11457(a)(5)

- (8), §63.11457(c) 40 CFR 63.10

Reports Reports of deviation N/A N/A N/A Semiannual monitoring reports N/A N/A N/A Initial/repeat performance tests N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.7(e)(1) / 40 CFR 63.6(h)(7) Quality assurance test plan N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.7(c) CMS performance evaluation/report N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.8(e)(5) SSM reports N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) Excess emissions reports N/A N/A 40 CFR 63.10(e)(3)26

ATTACHMENT 1 C . INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
-- NESHAP FOR SECONDARY NONFERROU S METALS PROCESSING AREA SOURCES Requirement Citation for existing sources Citation for new sources General Provisions citation Monitoring Visual inspection of capture device §63.114 66(a) §63.11466(a) NA Visible emissions check §63.11466(b) NA NA Visual bag inspection §63.11466(b) NA NA Bag leak detection system NA §63.11466(c) NA

Notifications Notification of applicability Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.114 69 (a) Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.114 69 (a) 40 CFR 63.9(a)(2) Notification of co nstruction/reconstruction NA NA 40 CFR 63.9(b)(5) Notification of special compliance requirements Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT 40 CFR 63.9(d) Notification of performance test NA NA 40 CFR 63.9( e ) Notification of opacity/VE observations NA NA 40 CFR 63.9(f) Additional CMS notifications NA NA 40 CFR 63.9(g) Notification of compliance status Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.114 69 (b) Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.114 69 (b) 40 CFR 63.9(h) Notification of changes in information Tabl e 1 to subpart TTTTTT Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT 40 CFR 63.9(j)

Plans SSM plan NA NA 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) Performance test plan NA NA 40 CFR 63.7(c)(2) CMS quality control plan NA NA 40 CFR 63.8(d) CMS performance evaluation test plan NA NA 40 CFR 63.8 (e)(3)

Records Records of notifications Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / § 63.114 70 (a)(1) Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / § 63.114 70 (a)(1) 40 CFR 63.10 M onitoring/inspection information Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / § 63.114 70 (a)(2) Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / § 63 .114 70 (a)(2) 40 CFR 63.10

Reports Reports of deviation NA NA NA Semiannual monitoring reports NA NA NA Initial/repeat performance tests NA NA 40 CFR 63.7(e)(1) / 40 CFR 63.6(h)(7) Quality assurance test plan NA NA 40 CFR 63.7(c) CMS performance evaluation/report NA NA 40 CFR 63.8(e)(5) SSM reports NA NA 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) Excess emissions reports NA NA 40 CFR 63.10(e)(3)