alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
252 La. 703

#### Johnny B. JENNINGS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 49453.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 22, 1968.

In re: Johnny B. Jennings applying for writ of certiorari.

The application is denied. Having considered the response of the State of Louisiana (herein filed August 16, 1968) to applicant’s petition for writ of certiorari and the documents thereto attached, we conclude that the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J., recused.
Exhibit 4.2


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM


 


We have issued our report dated October 18, 2022, with respect to the
financial statement of m+ funds Trust, Series 1-29 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-267614)
and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use
of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


 


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 18, 2022
#### BOLEN INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Illinois corporation, (formerly known as Terox Corporation of America), Appellant, v. Robert S. MEDOW, Appellee.

No. 67-741.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 13, 1967.

' PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal quashed.

Appeal after remand, Fla.App., 191 So.2d 51.
#### Johnny Mitchell WHITFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-99.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 16, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Underwood v. State (1944), 154 Fla. 839, 19 So.2d 405; Robertson v. State, 64 Fla. 437, 60 So. 118; Smith v. State, 74 Fla. 44, 76 So. 334; F.S. § 924.33, F.S.A.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1570 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1570

 To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize advance 
appropriations for the Indian Health Service by providing 2-fiscal-year 
               budget authority, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 10, 2013

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself, Mr. Begich, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, and 
  Mr. Schatz) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize advance 
appropriations for the Indian Health Service by providing 2-fiscal-year 
               budget authority, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Indian Health Service Advance 
Appropriations Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ADVANCE APPROPRIATIONS FOR CERTAIN INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE 
              ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 825 of the Indian Health Care Improvement 
Act (25 U.S.C. 1680o) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``There are authorized''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) For each fiscal year, beginning with fiscal year 2015, 
discretionary new budget authority provided for the Indian Health 
Services and Indian Health Facilities accounts of the Indian Health 
Service shall include advance discretionary new budget authority that 
first becomes available for the first fiscal year after the budget 
year.
    ``(c) The Secretary shall include in documents submitted to 
Congress in support of the President's budget submitted pursuant to 
section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and 
each succeeding fiscal year detailed estimates of the funds necessary 
for the Indian Health Services and Indian Health Facilities accounts of 
the Indian Health Service for the fiscal year following the fiscal year 
for which the budget is submitted.''.
    (b) Submission of Budget Request.--Section 1105(a) of title 31, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(37) the list'' and inserting ``(39) the 
        list''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(40) information on estimates of appropriations for the 
        fiscal year following the fiscal year for which the budget is 
        submitted for the following accounts of the Indian Health 
        Service:
                    ``(A) Indian Health Services.
                    ``(B) Indian Health Facilities.''.
                                 <all>
```
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Second Quarter:  2004 and 2005



                                          90-percent       90-percent

                        Second   Second   confidence       confidence

Age of householder      Quarter  Quarter  interval (&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>    interval (&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>

                         2004     2005    of 2005 rate     of difference



United States.......      69.2     68.6       0.5           0.4



    Under 25 years..      25.7     25.9       1.5           1.4

    25 to 29 years..      40.8     39.9       1.5           1.4

    30 to 34 years..      57.6     56.8       1.4           1.3

    35 to 39 years..      66.1     65.8       1.3           1.2

    40 to 44 years..      72.3     71.3       1.2           1.1

    45 to 49 years..      77.1     74.9       1.1           1.2

    50 to 54 years..      76.8     77.9       1.1           1.2

    55 to 59 years..      81.6     81.0       0.8           0.9

    60 to 64 years..      83.4     81.8       0.9           0.9

    65 to 69 years..      83.5     81.8       1.5           1.3

    70 to 74 years..      83.5     83.2       1.5           1.3

    75 years and over..   78.8     78.2       1.1           1.0



     Under 35 years..     43.6     42.8       0.9           0.8

     35 to 44 years..     69.4     68.7       0.9           0.8

     45 to 54 years..     77.0     76.3       0.8           0.8

     55 to 64 years..     82.4     81.3       0.6           0.6

     65 years and over..  81.1     80.3       0.8           0.7



<sup>a</sup>A 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliablilty.  

The larger the confidence interval is, in relation to the size of the estimate, the 

less reliable the estimate.
261 La. 529

#### Saul A. MINTZ et al. v. Herbert L. BREARD, Jr., et al.

No. 52309.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 1972.

In re: Herbert L. Breard, Jr. and Mrs. Lady Bird Breard applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Ouachita. 258 So.2d 106.

Writ denied. The result is correct.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORIO SANTIAGO SANTIAGO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent. 

No. 15-71307 

Agency No. A088-923-474 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 24, 2017**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, 

Circuit Judges.

Gregorio Santiago Santiago, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal and voluntary 

departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71307 

evidence the agency’s factual findings, and we review de novo questions of law.

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for 

review.

The agency did not err in determining that Santiago Santiago was statutorily 

barred from establishing the good moral character required for cancellation of

removal and voluntary departure, where substantial evidence supports the agency’s 

finding that he did not sufficiently establish that his periods of incarceration did not 

exceed 180 days. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(f)(7), 1229b(b)(1)(B), 1229c(b)(1)(B).

We do not consider the extra-record evidence submitted for the first time 

with Santiago Santiago’s opening brief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A) (judicial 

review is limited to the administrative record); Dent v. Holder, 627 F.3d 365, 371 

(9th Cir. 2010) (stating standard for review of out-of-record evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      707
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,436
<PP&E>                                          14,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,570
<SALES>                                         25,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,051
<CGS>                                            9,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,341
<INCOME-TAX>                                       889
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,452
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,452
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
#### Gladys BARLEY, Appellant, v. W. R. GRACE & COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 71-116.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 2, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 22

- 00133

- CV

IN RE Rudy Wilkins DE LA GARZA , Maria Ysais and Idea Apps, LLC , Relators

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 16 , 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 3, 2022 , relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the

petition and the record, this court concludes relator s did not show they are entitled to the relief

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019

- CV

- 06052 , styled Dawn Prieskorn v. Rudy Wilkins De La Garza,

Marie Ysais, and Idea Apps LLC , pending in the County Court a t Law No. 10

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable

David J. Rodriguez presiding.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 COMSYS IT PARTNERS, INC. AND AFFILIATES CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 26, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Michael T. Willis, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies that to his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Michael T. WillisMichael T. WillisPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 10, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to COMSYS IT Partners,
Inc. and will be retained by COMSYS IT Partners, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 31
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00133-CV

IN RE Rudy Wilkins DE LA GARZA, Maria Ysais and Idea Apps, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 16, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 3, 2022, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition and the record, this court concludes relators did not show they are entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019-CV-06052, styled Dawn Prieskorn v. Rudy Wilkins De La Garza, 

Marie Ysais, and Idea Apps LLC, pending in the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable 

David J. Rodriguez presiding.
#### Eunice WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Clyde WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellee.

No. 72-565.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 12, 2014

No. 04-14-00564-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF WADE R. BEDELL, JR., DECEASED,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PC-0636

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 31, 2014, this appeal was abated to the trial court with instructions to enter 

findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court clerk was ordered to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions by December 1, 2014. The 

clerk’s office of this court has verbally notified the trial court clerk that the supplemental clerk’s 

record is late. The trial court clerk stated that the clerk who prepares supplemental clerk’s 

records was not available; however, the trial court clerk faxed the findings of fact and 

conclusions of law to this court on December 12, 2014. It is therefore ORDERED that this 

appeal is REINSTATED on the docket of this court. It is further ORDERED that if appellant 

intends to file an amended brief in view of the findings of fact and conclusions of law, the 

amended brief must be filed no later than thirty days from the date of this order. The clerk of 

this court is directed to electronically provide a copy of the findings of fact and conclusions of 

law to both the appellant’s attorney and the appellee’s attorney.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court clerk shall file a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law no later than December 22, 2014. 

Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate 

record is timely filed,” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c), the clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy 

of this order on the Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge of Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, 

Texas.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Centenary International Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Hector A. Patron Costas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of
                the
                Company.

















/s/
        Hector A. Patron Costas


Hector
      A.
      Patron Costas


Chief
      Financial Officer


April
      11,
      2007





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated
      by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
      or
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
      the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
      Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


0759.5






35
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
          United States:  Fourth Quarter 1995            
                                                        
(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)
                                                                     
                                    Fourth Quarter 1995             
                                                                   
                                                 Standard   Percent 
          Type                                   error on   Distri-
                                    Estimate     estimate    bution
                                                                  
All housing units.................   112,987         230       100
                                                                  
  Occupied........................   100,363         237        89
    Owner occupied................    65,355         230        58
    Renter occupied...............    35,008         190        31
                                                                  
  Vacant..........................    12,624         123        11
    Year-round vacant.............     9,529         108         8
      For rent....................     2,966          61         3
      For sale only...............     1,050          37         1
      Rented or sold,                                             
      awaiting occupancy..........       763          31         1
      Held off market.............     4,750          77         4
        For occasional use........     1,671          46         1
        Temporarily occupied                                      
        by persons with                                           
        usual residence elsewhere.       786          32         1
        For other reasons.........     2,293          54         2
                                                                  
    Seasonal vacant...............     3,095          63         3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,694
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (924)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,068
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,119
<PP&E>                                         499,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 465,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,771
<BONDS>                                        171,771
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,044
<COMMON>                                         8,968
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,059
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   465,699
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,556)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,879
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,559
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,076
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,737)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        

</TABLE>