alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé and David R. McHale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



/s/ Cheryl W. Grisé

(Signature)

Cheryl W. Grisé

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ David R. McHale

(Signature)

David R. McHale

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



March 16, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We the
undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | this annual report on Form 20-F of BT Group plc fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BT Group plc.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  May 24, 2018



|                    |  |  |  |                               
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | /s/ Gavin Patterson           
|                    |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | Name: Gavin Patterson         
|                    |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive        
|                    |  | 
|Date:  May 24, 2018 |  |  |  | /s/ Simon Lowth               
|                    |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | Name: Simon Lowth             
|                    |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

CROSSTEX ENERGY SERVICES, 

LP, CROSSTEX LIG, LLC AND

CROSSTEX PROCESSING

SERVICES, LLC

VERSUS

NO. 2022 CW 0867

TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC, ET AUGUST 16, 2022

AL

In Re: Texas Brine Company, LLC, applying for supervisory

writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of

Assumption, No. 34202. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. The district court' s August 11, 2022

judgment, granting Legacy Vulcan, LLC' s Motion in Limine to

Preclude Proffer of Evidence Relative to Dismissed Claims is

reversed. Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 1636

provides, "[ w] hen the court rules against the admissibility of

any evidence, it shall either permit the party offering such

evidence to make a complete record thereof, or permit the party

to make a statement setting forth the nature of the evidence." 

The word " shall" is mandatory. Sanchez v. Georgia Gulf Corp., 

2002- 1617 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 8/ 13/ 03), 853 So. 2d 697, 704. 

Accordingly, the district court is instructed to allow Texas

Brine Company, LLC to either offer such evidence to make a

complete record thereof or to make a statement setting forth the

nature of the evidence. 

JMM

GH

EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Document

EXHIBIT 10.1 
Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement


WHEREAS, Philippe Krakowsky (the “Executive”) and The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (“Interpublic,” Interpublic and its subsidiaries being referred to herein as the “Company”) are parties to an Executive Change of Control Agreement dated as of May 27, 2010, as amended (the “Agreement”); 


WHEREAS, Section 5.1 of the Agreement states that the Agreement will expire as of September 30, 2022; 


WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company wish to extend the Agreement and make certain additional updates; and


NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended, effective immediately, as follows:


1.Incorporation by Reference. All provisions of the Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by reference and shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent that such provisions are expressly modified by the provisions of this Amendment. Words and phrases used in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement unless the context clearly indicates that a different meaning is intended.


2.Designated Number. Section 1.7 of the Agreement is amended by replacing “two (2)” with “two point five (2.5)”.


3.Extension. Section 5.1(a)(i) of the Agreement is amended by replacing “September 30, 2022” with “October 31, 2025”.


4.Notices.  Section 5.9 of the Agreement is amended by replacing “, 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036, Attention:” with “at the then current address for Interpublic headquarters with Attention to the”.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Interpublic, by its duly authorized officer, and Executive have caused this Amendment to the Agreement to be executed.


									
	The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
		Executive
	By: /s/ Andrew Bonzani
		By: /s/ Philippe Krakowsky

	Andrew Bonzani		Philippe Krakowsky
	EVP, General Counsel		
	Date: October 26, 2022
		Date: October 26, 2022
# C_2011258EN.01000201.xml

| 2.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6196 — Lenovo/Medion)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 258/02

On 26 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6196. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6196. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 16, 2010 

1209 

Order 

 

December 16, 2010 

140990 & (41) 

MIDWEST BUS CORPORATION, f/k/a 

MIDWEST BUS REBUILDERS 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140990 

 COA: 288686 

Ct of Claims: 06-000095-MT 

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and STATE 

TREASURER, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2010 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

 DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smith Micro Software, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: November 4, 2010
    /s/ William W. Smith, Jr.William W. Smith Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2014-0423 (2013-NM-233-AD)
No. 10916.

#### The Aetna Insurance Co. *v.*Penn et al.

Decided October 19, 1909.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Paxton &'*

*Warrington*and *Mr. James J. Muir,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. A. Hicks; AJr. W. F. North*and *Messrs. Obermeyre & Sharp,*for defendants in error.

On rehearing.

Former judgment adhered to.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          13,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,974
<INVENTORY>                                     46,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,753
<PP&E>                                          99,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,684
<BONDS>                                        100,236
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,572
<SALES>                                        192,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,610
<CGS>                                          109,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,957
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,607
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    5,607
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    5,607
        

</TABLE>
Table 9.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  2002 and 2001
 
(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding
 
 
                                           Standard
                                           error on Standard     2002
Type                      2002       2001     2002  error on  Percent
                         estimate estimate estimatedifferenc of total
 
All housing units....... 123,318  121,480      170      241      100
 
  Occupied.............. 108,539  107,010      180      255       88
    Owner occupied......  73,713   72,593      181      256       60
    Renter occupied.....  34,826   34,417      146      206       28
 
  Vacant................  14,779   14,470      102      143       12
    Year-round vacant...  11,272   10,916       90      126        9
      For rent..........   3,497    3,203       51       71        3
      For sale only.....   1,277    1,301       31       44        1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy     877      882       26       37        1
      Held off market...   5,621    5,530       64       91        5
        For occasional u   1,902    1,887       38       53        2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence    1,035    1,064       28       40        1
        For other reason   2,684    2,579       45       63        2
 
    Seasonal vacant.....   3,507    3,554       51       73        3
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George
J. Coates, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of
Coates International, Ltd., certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coates International, Ltd. (the
"Company");





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and I
have:





(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and





(c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and to
the audit committee of the Company's board of directors:





(a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and





6. I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.






May 14,
      2008
              
              /s/ George
      J. CoatesGeorge
      J. CoatesPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer

I, Frederic T. Boyer, certify that:

   1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
          of Qualstar Corporation;

   2.     Based on my knowledge, this amendment does not contain any untrue
          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this amendment; and

   3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in this amendment, fairly present in all material
          respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
          of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
          amendment.

Date:  October 27, 2004



                                                   /s/ Frederic T. Boyer
                                             --------------------------------
                                                       Frederic T. Boyer
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
Written Statement of the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Midwest Express
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert S. Bahlman
----------------------------
Robert S. Bahlman

November 14, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-11271 Summary Calendar

ANAND P. AGARWAL; URMILA AGARWAL, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus RHONALD MORRIS; BETTY MORRIS, Substitute Trustee; JOHN BAYLESS; SHIRLEY SMITH, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(94-CV-2623-P)

- - - - - - - - - - February 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Plaintiffs-Appellants Anand and Urmila Agarwal appeal the district court’s denial of their motions fo r remand of their complaint to state cour t and the court’s grant of DefendantAppellees’ motion for s ummary judgment, dismissing the Agarwals’ claims. They argue first that the court erred by dismissing their claims of (1) breach of contract; (2) promissory estoppel; (3) wrongful acceleration and foreclosure; (4) unjust enrichment;2

(5) conspiracy; (6) interference with contractual relatio ns, and myriad other claims. As a preliminary issue, we conclude that despite the Agarwals’ imprecise notice of appeal, we have jurisdiction to review their claims that remand was warranted. S ee
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Deshotel , 142 F.3d 873, 884 (5th Cir. 1998). Regarding the remand issue, however, we find no abuse of discretion. McClelland v. Gronwaldt , 155 F.3d 507, 519 (5th Cir. 1998). With regard to the merits of the Agarwals’ complaint, we have reviewed de novo the record and the briefs of the parties and
conclude that the district court correctly granted summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons given by that

court. See Agarwal v. Morris , No. 3:94-CV-2623-P (N.D. Tex.; Jul 8, 1996, and Oct. 1, 1997).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



## 906 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The accompanying Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
     January 14, 2010
     
     /s/ David H. RochePresident andChief Executive Officer/s/ Steven M. CaspersExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer














---