alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BIRNER
DENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,160,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,678,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                    97,700
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,074,499
<PP&E>                                       3,829,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                 762,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,850,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,253,979
<BONDS>                                        263,808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,691,963
<OTHER-SE>                                   (359,750)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,850,000
<SALES>                                      6,208,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,208,944
<CGS>                                        5,071,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,071,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               579,951
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             407,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                149,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,984
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            101,968
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   101,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      645
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,218
<PP&E>                                          24,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,964
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,299
<SALES>                                         39,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,823
<CGS>                                           10,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,398
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,771
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,771
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
        

</TABLE>
Transport Transports 

Canada Canada

 TP 7245E

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian 

Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X. Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H, the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. 

Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard. 

This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. 

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8, or 1-800-305-2059, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp 

24-0022 (01-2005)

1/1 No.

CF-2011-21

Issue Date 

 12 July 2011 

Number: CF-2011-21 

Subject: Fuel System – Chafing of High Pressure Fuel Line

Effective: 28 July 2011 

Applicability: Bombardier Inc. DHC-8 Aeroplane Models 400, 401 and 402 Serial Numbers 4001, 

4003 through 4354, and 4356 through 4363. 

Compliance: As indicated below, unless already accomplished. 

Background: During routine maintenance, an operator discovered evidence of chafing on a high 

pressure (HP) fuel line. The source of chafing was related to the improper installation of 

an expandable pin on the lower cowl assembly, which caused the lanyard to foul against 

the HP fuel line. This condition, if not corrected, may cause fuel leakage in a fire zone. 

Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin (SB) 84-71-13 to introduce spring clips to 

positively retain and control the lanyards, regardless of the installation orientation of the 

expandable pin to rectify this problem. 

Corrective 

Actions: 

Within 6000 hours air time or 36 months after the effective date of this directive, 

whichever occurs first, install spring clips, reposition the lanyard attachment points and 

complete all required actions in accordance with Bombardier SB 84-71-13, dated 

19 May 2011, or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, 

Transport Canada. 

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

Derek Ferguson 

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness 

Contact: Mr. Robin Lau, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 

613- 996-9178 or e-mail CAWWEBFeedback@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                        AMERCIAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Three Months Ended
                                                                                     March 31,
                                                                               1998             1997
                                                                               ----             ----
<S>                                                                        <C>              <C>         
          Net earnings ...............................................     $  1,185,000     $    881,000
                                                                           ============     ============

          Common shares outstanding at beginning of period ...........        6,452,904        5,123,274

              Effect of shares issued during the period ..............            4,322          127,523
                                                                           ------------     ------------

          Basic weighted average common shares .......................        6,457,226        5,250,797

          Incremental shares from assumed conversions:

              Stock options ..........................................          163,520          173,798
              Warrants ...............................................           28,494               --
                                                                           ------------     ------------

          Diluted weighted average common shares .....................        6,649,240        5,424,595
                                                                           ============     ============

              Basic earnings per share ...............................     $       0.18     $       0.17

              Diluted earnings per share .............................     $       0.18     $       0.16
</TABLE>




                                       14
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1512 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1512

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2013

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, as the ``Specialist 
                 Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST THEODORE MATTHEW GLENDE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate November 12, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JOSE SANDOVAL-VALADEZ, Defendant - Appellant. No. 18-3231 (D.C. No. 6:08-CR -10223-JWB-1) (D. Kan.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before BRISCOE , McHUGH , and CARSON , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Jose Sandoval-Valadez pleaded gu ilty to two counts of aggravate d identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S. C. § 1028A. He wa s sentenced to 48 months’ imprisonment, to run consecutivel y to an Arizona state court se ntence of 12 years and 11 months that he is currently s erving. Although the plea agre ement contained an appeal waiver, Mr. Sandoval-Va ladez appealed. The government m oves to enforce the appeal waiver under United States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata , and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 1 0th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### April 23, 2019
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 Under Hahn , we consider “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate r ights; (2) whether the defend ant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellat e rights; and (3) whether enforc ing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. Mr. Sandoval-Va ladez’s counsel filed a response to the government’s m otion, stating a belief that th ere are no non-frivolous grounds to oppose the motion to enforce the appeal waiver and r equesting permission to withdraw. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1 967) (authorizing counsel to request permission to withdraw where counsel determi nes that appeal would be wholly frivolous). Mr . Sandoval-Valadez then filed a pro se response stating that the govern ment’s motion to enf orce the appeal waiv er should be granted. We have independently reviewed th e parties’ filings and the rec ord, and we conclude that the requirements fo r enforcing the appeal waiver under Hahn have been satisfied. Accordingly, we gran t the motion to enforce the app eal waiver, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw , and dismiss the appeal.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
#### John W. GIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The SUCCESSION of Mercer SCOTT et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3910.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 5, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 1, 1972.

Makar & Whitaker by John B. Whitaker, John G. Gibbs, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gahagan & Kelly by Russell E. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, HOOD, and DOMEN-GEAUX, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This is a suit by a holder of a promissory note. The defendants are Robert Nix, a maker; and the widow, individually, and as administratrix of the Succession of Mercer Scott, the other maker. Robert Nix was discharged from the suit by a release. The suit was defended on a defense of lack of consideration for the note. From an adverse judgment plaintiff has appealed. Plaintiff has filed two motions for remand. We grant a remand on one of these motions.

Plaintiff-appellant urges that since the heirs of the succession unconditionally accepted the succession before trial they became indispensable parties to the suit. We think that it was a fatal error to *250proceed to a trial without joining or substituting the heirs as defendants. The succession representative appointed by a court of this state is the proper defendant in an action to enforce an obligation of the deceased or of his succession, while the latter is under administration. LSA-C.C.P. Article 734. This article indicates in the last clause that the representative is no longer a proper party defendant when the succession is closed and the representative is discharged. Cf. Davis v. Chapier’s Curator, 4 La. 133 (1832). In order to insure justice and a finality to this litigation, we remand this suit for a joinder of the heirs as defendants and for a new trial.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is annulled, and the case is remanded. The costs of this appeal to be paid by the appellant.

Annulled and remanded.
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation, and Clifford W. O’Key, City Manager of the City of Miami Beach, Appellants, v. Harry J. CHADDERTON, Appellee.

No. 72-1094.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 6, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1882 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend parity for exclusion 

from income for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2013 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

parity for exclusion from income for employer-provided 

mass transit and parking benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PARITY FOR EXCLUSION FROM 

4 INCOME FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED MASS 

5 TRANSIT AND PARKING BENEFITS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 132(f) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik8 ing ‘‘January 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1882 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to months after December 31, 

3 2013. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7322

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DAVID ANTHONY WIGGINS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:16-cr-00449-RDB-1)

Submitted: February 16, 2017 Decided: February 21, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Anthony Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

David Anthony Wiggins appeals the district court’s order 

remanding his state criminal prosecution to state court. We 

affirm. 

In certain circumstances, a state criminal prosecution may 

be removed to federal district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1443 

(2012). Such removal is improper absent “a showing that the

defendant is being denied rights guaranteed under a federal law 

providing for specific civil rights stated in terms of racial 

equality.” South Carolina v. Moore, 447 F.2d 1067, 1070 (4th 

Cir. 1971) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see 

also Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 792 (1966). “If at any 

time before final judgment it appears that the district court 

lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 

28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012). 

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Wiggins has 

not made the requisite showing for removal under § 1443. Thus, 

the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the 

removed prosecution and appropriately remanded the case to state 

court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to appeal in forma 

pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# C_2011281EN.01002001.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/20

---

Modification of the cut-off dates of the continuously open call for the proposals of the Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel as referred to in Article 25 of the Council Decision 2008/376/EC for the years 2012 and 2013

2011/C 281/09

In accordance with the provisions of Article 25 of the Council Decision 2008/376/EC on the adoption of the Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel and on the multiannual technical guidelines for this programme (1), allowing the Commission the possibility to alter the cut-off date of 15 September of each year for the submission of proposals for evaluation in accordance with Article 41(d) of this Decision, the Commission has decided that the cut-off date applicable for 2012 will be 18 September 2012 and the cut-off date applicable for 2013 will be 17 September 2013. This modification enters in force on the date of publication of this notice in the Official Journal.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 130, 20.5.2008, p. 7.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4-E



                               (TRUSERV LOGO (R))

                               % PROMISSORY NOTE


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, TRUSERV CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation (hereinafter
called the "Company") HEREBY PROMISES TO PAY to the registered owner hereof,
the following listed sum, being the face amount of this note, in lawful money
of the United States, at the principal office of the Company. This note shall be
payable in five (5) equal annual installments of principal, the first of which
shall be paid on the December 31 next following the date of the note and
thereafter on December 31 of each year, and shall bear interest on the
outstanding principal balance at the rate of ____________ percent (      %) per
annum, payable at the time of payment of principal installments.

The Company reserves the right and option of redeeming or prepaying this note,
in whole or in part at any time or from time to time, upon the making of such
total or partial principal payment together with accrued interest to the date
of redemption on the portion being redeemed or prepaid. There shall be no
premium payable upon such premature redemption or prepayment.

The Company shall have a LIEN on this note, and a RIGHT OF SETOFF against
amounts which may be or become payable hereunder, for such indebtedness to the
Company of the original holder and/or of any subsequent holder hereof as may
from time to time exist. In accordance with the Company's By-Laws, if the
company exercises its right of setoff, the company shall have the right to
discount the note to its then current cash value which shall be the lesser of
the face amount of the note or the yield to maturity of the note as discounted
at a rate per annum equal to the prime rate in effect at the time of setoff at
the Harris Trust and Savings Bank, Chicago, Illinois, plus two percentage
points.

No transfer of this note shall be valid unless made at the office of the
Company by the registered owner in person or by his/her duly authorized attorney
and noted hereon, and, except in the case of transfer to banks or other lending
institutions or associations, no transfer shall be made to any person other
than one who, on the date of such transfer, is a stockholder of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRUSERV CORPORATION has caused this note to be executed by
its officers thereunto duly enabled and its corporate seal to be hereunto
affixed the date of issue below.


         PRINCIPAL AMOUNT              VOID                    DOLLARS
                           __________________________________
                           REASON ISSUED - Redemption of TruServ Corporation
                                           Class B Common Stock  ($____________)

REGISTERED OWNER:          VOID

                        FINAL INSTALLMENT DATE -

                        DATE OF ISSUE -


                              TRUSERV CORPORATION
                          CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60631-3505



FN20 - 080100R