alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1063

KENDALL H. BREEDLOVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SKY BRYCE ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED; L. E.

HOOLE; DENISE F. BARB; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; JOHN #1 DOE, and other defendants unknown

at present,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 98-1064

KENDALL H. BREEDLOVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES J. MIHALIK, In his capacity as President

of the Sky Bryce Association, Incorporated,

and in his individual capacity; SKY BRYCE

ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED; JOHN DOE,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (CA-97-41-H, CA-95-55-H)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kendall H. Breedlove, Appellant Pro Se. James Van Ingold, CHADWICK,

WASHINGTON, OLTERS, MORIARTY & LYNN, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia; Mark

Dudley Obenshain, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, Harrisonburg,

Virginia; Richard Cullen, Gregory E. Lucyk, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint and

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and the

district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Breedlove

v. Sky Bryce Assoc., Inc., No. CA-97-41-H (W.D. Va. Nov. 13 & Dec.

12, 1997); Breedlove v. Mihalik, No. CA-95-55-H (W.D. Va. July 1,

1996; Dec. 12, 1997). We deny Appellant’s “motion for certification” and “Sworn Motion for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

to Cause the Correction and the Certification of Each of the False,

Tampered, Incomplete, Uncertified Records on Appeal from the

Federal District Court, in each of the Two Instant Appeals.” We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                       177
<INVENTORY>                                        703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,765
<PP&E>                                             127
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,774
<SALES>                                         79,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,728
<CGS>                                           76,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    585
<INCOME-TAX>                                       181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  Third Quarter 2005 and 2006

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   Third Quarter 2005

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.6       7.1       9.6      11.6       8.0
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.0       3.7       3.4       2.5
      For sale only......................      1.2       0.8       1.5       1.4       0.9
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      1.0       0.9       1.0       1.0       1.0
      Held off market....................      4.4       3.4       3.4       5.9       3.6
        For occasional use...............      1.4       0.9       0.7       2.1       1.6
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.7       0.7       1.0       0.7
        For other reasons................      2.1       1.8       2.0       2.7       1.3

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.1       3.7       2.7       3.2       2.8

    Occupied.............................     87.4      89.1      87.7      85.2      89.2



                                                   Third Quarter 2006


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.9       8.1       9.8      11.9       8.4
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.6       3.5       3.4       2.2
      For sale only......................      1.5       1.0       1.8       1.7       1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.9       0.8       1.0       0.9       0.9
      Held off market....................      4.5       3.7       3.6       5.8       4.0
        For occasional use...............      1.5       0.7       0.8       2.1       1.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.9       0.6       1.1       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.2       2.1       2.1       2.6       1.4

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.2       3.8       2.9       3.1       2.9

    Occupied.............................     86.9      88.0      87.3      84.9      88.7
June 14, 2012

President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, D.C. 20500

The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson Administrator Environmental Protection Agency Room 3000, Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460

Dear Mr. President and Administrator Jackson:

Our organizations thank you for your leadership in carrying out clean air solutions that are securing healthier, longer lives for millions of Am ericans, and we respectfully convey our strong support for protective standards as you complete wo rk on the vitally important decision by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to revise the n ation's health-based ambient air quality standards for particulate pollution. Particulate pol lution is one of the most deadly airborne
contaminants in our environment and our communities , shortening and impairing the lives of numerous Americans afflicted by dangerous particula te pollution levels. Strong air quality standards for particulate pollution, hewing to the science, are both essential to protect the health and welfare of millions of Americans and required u nder the Clean Air Act.

Particulate pollution is associated with serious adv erse human health impacts, including premature death; cardiovascular disease such as hea rt attacks, strokes, heart disease; and respiratory disease. Consistent with the most recen t health science, we urge you to strengthen the annual standard for fine particulate matter to 11 micrograms per cubic meter and the 24- hour standard to 25 micrograms per cubic meter. Str engthening the nation's current health standards for particulate pollution in this way cou ld prevent as many as 35,700 premature deaths, 2,350 heart attacks, and 23,000 visits to t he hospital and emergency room each year. We also support adoption of the strongest visibility p rotection standard recommended by staff for particulate pollution.2

Americans across our nation are counting on you to provide healthier and longer lives, safer communities and a stronger nation by adopting vital ly important health-based ambient air quality standards, anchored in science, for these d eadly airborne contaminants. Thank you for your leadership.

Sincerely,

Center for Biological Diversity

Clean Air Task Force

Clean Water Action Earthjustice

Environment America
Environmental Defense Fund Greenpeace League of Conservation Voters

Natural Resources Defense Council Safe Climate Campaign
Sierra Club
Table B-2.  Standard Errors of Estimated Percentages for Characteristics of Vacant Rental and Homeowner
                    Housing Units:  1999



                                    Estimated percentage

                               1 or     2 or     5 or    10 or    15 or    20 or    25 or
                                 99       98       95       90       85       80       75       50


Vacant rental units........     0.1      0.2      0.3      0.4      0.5      0.6      0.6      0.7
Vacant homeowner units.....     0.2      0.3      0.4      0.6      0.7      0.8      0.9      1.0
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7228

JOHN H. BECKNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GERALDINE P. MIRO, Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-01-848-2-19AJ)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John H. Beckner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John H. Beckner appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Beckner v. Miro, No. CA-01-848-2-19AJ (D.S.C.

filed June 15, 2001; entered June 18, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Table 9.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  1996 and 1995

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                          Standard
                                          error on Standard     1996
Type                        1996     1995     1996 error on  Percent
                        estimate estimate estimate differencof total

All housing units....... 114,139  112,655      177      250      100

  Occupied.............. 100,984   99,985      182      258       88
    Owner occupied......  66,041   64,739      178      251       58
    Renter occupied.....  34,943   35,246      146      207       31

  Vacant................  13,155   12,670       96      135       12
    Year-round vacant...   9,946    9,571       85      119        9
      For rent..........   3,008    2,946       48       67        3
      For sale only.....   1,082    1,022       29       40        1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy     834      810       25       35        1
      Held off market...   5,022    4,793       61       85        4
        For occasional u   1,709    1,667       36       51        1
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence      852      801       25       35        1
        For other reason   2,461    2,325       43       60        2

    Seasonal vacant.....   3,209    3,099       49       69        3
#### William J. GODFREY, Jr., Appellant, v. Joan L. GODFREY, Joan L. Baumgarten, Appellees.

No. 72-906.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 11, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart LaMotte, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  1965 to 2005
               (in percent)
   Year       First    Second     Third     Fourth
             Quarter   Quarter   Quarter    Quarter

2005....        69.1      68.6      68.8      69.0
2004....        68.6      69.2      69.0      69.2
2003....        68.0      68.0      68.4      68.6
2002\r..        67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2002....        67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2001....        67.5      67.7      68.1      68.0
2000....        67.1      67.2      67.7      67.5

1999....        66.7      66.6      67.0      66.9
1998....        65.9      66.0      66.8      66.4
1997....        65.4      65.7      66.0      65.7
1996....        65.1      65.4      65.6      65.4
1995....        64.2      64.7      65.0      65.1
1994....        63.8      63.8      64.1      64.2
1993\r..        63.7      63.9      64.2      64.2
1993....        64.2      64.4      64.7      64.6
1992....        64.0      63.9      64.3      64.4
1991....        63.9      63.9      64.2      64.2
1990....        64.0      63.7      64.0      64.1
1989\r..        63.9      63.8      64.1      63.8

1989....        63.9      63.9      64.0      63.8
1988....        63.7      63.7      64.0      63.8
1987....        63.8      63.8      64.2      64.1
1986....        63.6      63.8      63.8      63.9
1985....        64.1      64.1      63.9      63.5
1984....        64.6      64.6      64.6      64.1
1983....        64.7      64.7      64.8      64.4
1982....        64.8      64.9      64.9      64.5
1981....        65.6      65.3      65.6      65.2
1980....        65.5      65.5      65.8      65.5
1979\r..        64.8      64.9      65.8      65.4

1979....        65.3      65.1      66.0      65.8
1978....        64.8      64.4      65.2      65.4
1977....        64.8      64.5      65.0      64.9
1976....        64.6      64.6      64.9      64.8
1975....        64.4      64.9      64.6      64.5
1974....        64.8      64.8      64.6      64.4
1973....        64.9      64.4      64.4      64.4
1972....        64.3      64.5      64.3      64.4
1971....        64.0      64.1      64.4      64.5
1970....        64.3      64.0      64.4      64.0
1969....        64.1      64.4      64.4      64.4
1968....        63.6      64.1      64.1      63.6
1967....        63.3      63.9      63.8      63.5
1966....        63.5      63.2      63.3      63.8
1965....        62.9      62.9      62.9      63.4
\r Revised.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - 2013 - 0635 Directorate ID: 20 12 - SW - 081 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model EC225LP Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): Three Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect corrosion or a crack in the swashplates, which could lead to failure of the swashplates and subsequent loss of helicopter control. Costs :  Inspecting the rotating and stationary swashplates for corros ion or a crack require s 8 work- hours for a cost of $680 per helicopter and $2,040 for the U.S. fleet, per inspection cycle. Making and installing the placard require s 0.5 work- hour, for a cost of $43 per helicopter. The labor cost of installing paper in th e flight manual is negligible for a helicopter.  Replacing the MRH assembly require s 24 work - hours , and parts cost $5,000, for a total cost of $7,040 per helicopter.

Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Gary

Roach
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Randall J. Fagundo, the Chief Executive Officer ofAmerican Coin Merchandising, Inc. (the “Company”), and Kenneth W. Edic, theSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies that:
1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March31, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”), to which this Certification is attachedas Exhibit 32, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end ofthe period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of theCompany.
Dated: May 17, 2004       By: /s/ RANDALL J. FAGUNDO By: /s/ KENNETH W. EDIC       Randall J. Fagundo   Kenneth W. Edic Chief Executive Officer   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separatedisclosure document.
22
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7812

CHARLES LAMONT POLLARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-

2074-MJG)

Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: April 30, 1999

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Lamont Pollard, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Lamont Pollard appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Pollard v. Corcoran, No. CA98-2074-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Housing Vacancies and Homeownership    >Press Release
 Skip to looking for section Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  Tuesday, January 30, 2024
 Quarterly Residential Vacancies and Homeownership, Fourth Quarter 2023
 January 30, 2024
 National vacancy rates in the fourth quarter 2023 were 6.6 percent for rental housing and 0.9 percent for homeowner housing. The rental vacancy rate was higher than the rate in the fourth quarter 2022 (5.8 percent) and virtually the same as the rate in the third quarter 2023 (6.6 percent).
The homeowner vacancy rate of 0.9 percent was not statistically different than the rate in the fourth quarter 2022 (0.8 percent) and not statistically different from the rate in the third quarter 2023 (0.8 percent).
The homeownership rate of 65.7 percent was not statistically different from the rate in the fourth quarter 2022 (65.9 percent) and not statistically different from the rate in the third quarter 2023 (66.0 percent).
                                    
                                        Additional Release Materials	         Press Release            Rental Vacancy Rate Graph            Homeownership Rate Graph            Detailed Tables            Historical Tables            Source and Accuracy            Annual Statistics: 2023            Quarterly Vacancy and Homeownership Rates by State and MSA
 Contact
 Data Inquiries  
    E-mail Us!
   Media Inquiries  Email Us!
 Related Information
 Housing Topics
 Current Population Survey
 American Community Survey
 American Housing Survey
 Housing Inventory Estimate Methodology
 Survey of Market Absorption
 American FactFinder
 New Residential Construction
 Manufacturing and Construction Statistics
 Housing Affordability


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
**EXHIBIT 32.1**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned officers of Cray Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, to such officers’ knowledge,that:(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May7, 2007                   /s/ PETER J. UNGARO        Peter J. Ungaro        Chief Executive Officer and President              /s/ BRIAN C. HENRY        Brian C. Henry        Chief Financial Officer        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.