alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 
 I, Edward
B. Meyercord, III, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Talk America Holdings,
Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)  [omitted
pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)]
 
 c)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 April 25,
2005
 
 /s/
Edward B. Meyercord, III
 Edward B.
Meyercord, III
 Chief
Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Form 10-Q Issuer
  (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer as of the
dates and for the periods indicated in the Form 10-Q.
 /s/ Larry L. Enterline
    
    /s/ Amy BobbittLarry L. Enterline
    
    Amy BobbittChief Executive Officer
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerMay 12, 2008
    
    May 12, 2008
 31
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 1655** 

WEST VIRGINIA CWP FUND, As Carrier for Ragland Coal Co., Inc. , Petitioner ,

v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ROGER D. ADKINS , Respondent s
.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board ( 11

- 0450 BLA , 11

- 0450 BLA

- A )

.

Submitted : May 8, 2014 Decided: June 3 , 2014

Before SHEDD and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ashley M. Harman, Tiffany B. Davis, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner. M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Rae Ellen James, Associate Solicitor, Gary K. Stearman, Rita A. Roppolo, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Leonard J. Stayton, Inez, Kentucky, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
West Virginia CWP Fund s eeks review of the Benefits

Review Board ’ s decision and order affirming the administrative
law judge ’ s award of black lung benefits to Roger D. Adkins
pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901

- 945 (2012) . Our review of the

record discloses that the Board ’ s decision is based upon

substan tial evidence and is without reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board. West Va. CWP Fund v. Dir

. , OWCP , No s
. 11

-
0450 BLA , 11

- 0450 BLA

- A (B.R.B. Mar. 23, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument beca use the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1727 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1727

To require a Comptroller General of the United States report assessing 
       a study of the Army on the Combat vehicle industrial base.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2013

 Mr. Toomey (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a Comptroller General of the United States report assessing 
       a study of the Army on the Combat vehicle industrial base.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Army Combat Vehicle Industrial Base 
Study Validation Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT ON ASSESSMENT 
              OF ARMY STUDY ON THE COMBAT VEHICLE INDUSTRIAL BASE.

    (a) Report Required.--The Comptroller General of the United States 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting 
forth an assessment by the Comptroller General of the study of the Army 
on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle industrial base submitted to Congress 
pursuant to the Conference Report to Accompany H.R. 4310 (112th 
Congress), the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 
(House Report 112-705).
    (b) Elements.--The report required by subsection (a) shall--
            (1) address each of the combat vehicles included in the 
        study of the Army;
            (2) include an assessment of the reasonableness of the 
        study's methods including, but not limited to the sufficiency, 
        validity, and reliability of the data used to conduct the 
        study; and
            (3) include findings and recommendations on the combat 
        vehicle industrial base, but should not replicate the study of 
        the Army.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Mr. John L. Martin 

Airport Director 

San Francisco International Airport 

PO Box 8097 

San Francisco, CA 94128 

Dear Mr. Martin: 

Assistilnt Secretary 

July 3, 2012 

... ... ···· .. 

··. ! 

1_200 New JcrseyA;cnt.;<:.SE , 

':.tashlilston. DC 20590 

Thank you for your letter addressed to Secretary LaHood supporting the proposal submitted by 

the Ventura County/Oxnard Airport for a grant under the U.S. Department of Transportation's 

Small Community Air Service Development Program. The Secretary has requested that I 

respond on his behalf. 

The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies. particularly issues related to high airfares or 

insurticicnt service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 grant 

awards each year, although no mo_r~ than 4 ~lW<_mls may be to communities in the, same State. 

In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service 

deticiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types of projects that can be funded. 

On ivlay 15, the Department issued an order requesting that communities interested in receiving a 

grant this year tile their applications by June II. J\s these grant requests arc pending before the 

Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any pat1icular proposal. I assure you that the 

Di.!partmcnt will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly tiled. 

As is our nonnal practice, lam placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2012-0069 as a contact outside the record of this matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Sinc~:rdv vours. ol •. • 

Susan L. Kurland 

Assistant Sccrt.:tary for 

Aviation and International Affairs 
f-. . ·' -. · ~'l '"ri'~'id 

' ...... !i~;;~ ~··,··~· .. : ,.. ,, .. ' . 

, 

The Honorable Ray La Hood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

• ·SJ . r '~ • -.-;.. 

June 7, 2012 

I am \vTiting to express my support for Ventura County/Oxnard Airport's application for 

a Small Community Air Service Development grant under the Department of 

Transportation. This grant will greatly assist the airport in its effort to bring new 

commercial air service to their community and close a current gap in the California air 

transportation system. 

SfO is supportive of efforts..that lead to additi@nal ~1ir service for other commtm~t_ies 

within California. By allowing Oxnard Airport to restore air service that had, until 

recently been provided by them since 1946, it will enhance the economic development of 

all other airports and the entire State. 

We believe that a grant to the Ventura County/t)xnard Airport would be a boost for all of 

California commercial aviation at a time when it is.much needed and urge your full 

consideration of their application. 

(r7ours, 

--~ J 

John 'L.-Martin 

Airport Director 

i" .. 

'- ... • - -! 

. :' ::_·
No. 11586.

#### White et al. *v.*Drew.

Decided October 12, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of *496Hocking county.

*Mr. Edwin D. Ricketts*and *Mr. S. H. Bright,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. John C. Pettit,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.
Steve Reifenstuhl, General Manager Northern Southeast Regional Aquaculture Association Sincerely, I encourage US DOT to approve Harris Air's application for Air Carrier Certification. Harris Air provides a critical service to the communities it serves in southeast Alaska, including transporting people in need of medical services to Sitka and Juneau. Air service is the only practical mode of transportation to address rapid response. In addition, Harris Air provides critical food supplies and equipment to NSRAA's programs throughout the year. application for Air Carrier certification. Harris Air has been an outstanding southeast Alaska community member for two decades. NSRAA has programs at remote locations in Kasnyku Bay, Mist Cove (both in Chatham Strait), Kuiu Island, and Haines, Alaska. We depend on safe, reliable air service to conduct our work. We depend on Harris Air's scheduled and chartered air services year round. Northern Southeast Regional Aquaculture Association (NSRAA) fully supports Harris Aircraft Services



### , Re: Support Harris Aircraft Services Application for Air Carrier Certificate U.S

. Dept. of Transportation August 29,2014 1308 Sawmill Creek Road Sitka, Alaska 99835 SOUTHEAST REGIONAL AQUACULTURE ASSOCIATION, INC.
#### AMERICAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance corporation authorized to do business in Florida, Appellant, v. VOLKSWAGEN SOUTH, INC., a Florida corporation, f/k/a Over-Seas Motors, Inc., Appellee.

No. 71-246.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 4, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 4, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Charles Matlock, individually and * From the 35th District

d/b/a Matlock Insurance Agency, Court of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CV-1207249.

Vs. No. 11-14-00159-CV * October 2, 2014

Kenneth Fitzgerald and Gayle Fitzgerald * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

and Buford Narramore and (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Sharon Narramore, Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal 

are taxed against Charles Matlock.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARK TOMEI, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF MARIE

TOMEI
, Appellant,

v.

THOMAS TOMEI
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2660

[ October 7, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jessica Ticktin , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502017CP0001627XXXXSB

.

James G. Pressly, Jr. of Pressly, Pressly, Randolph & Pressly, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Wi ght of Mettler Randolph Massey Ferguson Carroll & Sterlacci, P.L., Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS
, M AY
, and D AMOORGIAN
, JJ. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2022244EN.01002801.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Boshab v Council

(Case T-103/21) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

(2022/C 244/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Évariste Boshab (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Lejeune, acting as Agent)

Re:

By his action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 30) and, second, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 5) in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Évariste Boshab to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Évariste Boshab to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.

---
#### MILES FRUIT COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, and Leroy William Ausburn, Appellants, v. Terry D. CONGER, a minor, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-560.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 18, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 11.1



UNITIL CORPORATION



COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                      |  |                         |        |      |   |       |  |   |      
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | -----
|                                                      |  | Year Ended December 31,
|                                                      |  | 2009                    |        | 2008 |   | 2007 
|EARNINGS PER SHARE (000s, except per share data)     |  |                         |        |      |   |       |  |   |      
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|Net Income                                            |  | $                       | 10,049 |      | $ | 9,735 |  | $ | 8,746
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|Less: Dividend Requirements on Preferred Stock        |  |                         | 134    |      |   | 135   |  |   | 136  
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|                                                      |  |                         |        |      |   |       |  |   |      
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|Net Income Applicable to Common Stock                 |  | $                       | 9,915  |      | $ | 9,600 |  | $ | 8,610
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|                                                      |  |                         |        |      |   |       |  |   |      
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|Average Number of Common Shares OutstandingBasic     |  |                         | 9,647  |      |   | 5,830 |  |   | 5,659
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|Dilutive Effect of Stock Options and Restricted Stock |  |                         |       |      |   |      |  |   | 13   
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|Average Number of Common Shares OutstandingDiluted   |  |                         | 9,647  |      |   | 5,830 |  |   | 5,672
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|Earnings Per ShareBasic                              |  | $                       | 1.03   |      | $ | 1.65  |  | $ | 1.52 
|                                                      |  |                         |       
|Earnings Per ShareDiluted                            |  | $                       | 1.03   |      | $ | 1.65  |  | $ | 1.52
**Exhibit 32.2.2**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

 

I, Robert Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2008, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: February 23, 2009
### THE SECRETARY TRANSPORTATION

The Honorable Doc Hastings U.S. House ofRepresentatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Hastings: W AS!-11NGTON, DC 20590 September 19, 2014

Thank you for your letter supporting the application submitted by the city ofYakin1a for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community Air Service Development Program. 

# .• The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares and insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum or40 grant awards each year, although no more lhan four may be to cmnmunities in the same Stale. To provide communities •vith latitudein developing solutions to their air service dellciencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofair service development. projects that can be funded. On June 30, the Department issued an order.setting a deadline of.luly 31 for applications. As these grant requests are pending before the Department I cannot comment on the merits ofany particular proposal. I assure you. however, that the Department will give full and fair consideration to 

### all proposals that have been properly filed. · As is our standard practice, 

### I am placing a copy ofyour letter and this response in Docket DOT-OST-2014-0113 as a contact outside the record orthis matter. 

## rappreciate your interest in this program.

Anthony R. FoxxDOC HASTINGS

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES CHAIRMAN

## <teongre~s 

# of tbe Wntteb**~tates** J!)ouse of**~eprestntatibes**

Ms. Brooke Chapman Associate Director July 29, 2014



### Small Community Air Service Development Program Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200

### New Jersey Ave, SE · Washington, D.C. 20590



### Dear Secretary Foxx, 1203 LONGWORTH Ho

..se**OF~tCE** BUtLOtljG WAS>I

.. CTON. DC 20515 1202122&-5616 2715 s...NT**ANORE~ Luu~.**  Sut!E D PASCO, WA 99301 15091 54)-93!13 402**E~ST** Y**~<.MA** AVENUE. SutTt 760 YA<IMA, WA 911901

1509) 452-3243 www.ha&tings.houso.gov



### Iwrite today to request full and fair consideration for the grant application submitted by the City ofYakima, Washington, underthe Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP). Access to safe, affordable, and efficient transportation is critical for rural and underserved areas- this is no more evident than in 

### Central Washington. Ensuring that our aviation system is integrated, and has the ability to move people and products throughout Central Washington and acr.oss our nation safely and efficient is vital. As aresult, Irequest that full and fair consideration be 

### given to the City ofYakima and its SCASDP grant application. Thank you for your consideration ofthis request. Should you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact myselforAnnick Miller on my staffat (202) 225-5816. 

# lJR**DocHastin~**

Member ofCongress
#### Oscar R. SCHROEDER, Appellant, v. LAUDERDALE LAKES COUNTRY CLUB, INC., a Florida corporation, and Adobi Realty Company, Inc., a corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-675.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Tedder, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# A

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/hvs/annual09/ann09def.html