alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Randall
J. Fagundo, the Chief Executive Officer of American Coin Merchandising, Inc.
(the Company), and Kenneth W. Edic, the Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of
his respective knowledge:



|1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2003 (the Periodic Report), to which this Certification is attached
as Exhibit 99.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the
Company.                                                            

|                                                                       |  |                                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2003                                                    |  |                                                                                           
|                                                                       |  |                                                                                           
|By: /s/ RANDALL J. FAGUNDO

Randall J. Fagundo
Chief Executive Officer |  | By: /s/ KENNETH W. EDIC

Kenneth W. Edic
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

21
##### 



Exhibit 12 COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES Year ended December 312004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002(Dollars in Millions)Earnings available for Fixed Charges:Loss from continuing operations
before minority interest, minority interest,
equity in net losses of affiliated
companies, and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle
    
    $
    (1,160.4
    )
    
    $
    (123.6
    )
    
    $
    (216.9
    )Income tax benefit
    
    $
    (916.5
    )
    
    
    (68.3
    )
    
    
    (113.0
    )Equity in net losses of affiliated companies
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    8.1
    
    
    
    19.9Fixed Charges (see below), excluding
capitalized interest
    
    
    467.9
    
    
    
    502.8
    
    
    
    631.5Total
    
    $
    (1,605.5
    )
    
    $
    319.0
    
    
    $
    321.5Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    429.1
    
    
    $
    467.8
    
    
    $
    549.9Minority interest expense (pre tax)
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    51.5Capitalized interest
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    0.0Interest component of rentals charges to
income
    
    
    38.8
    
    
    
    35.0
    
    
    
    30.1Dividends on subsidiary preferred stock
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    0.0Total fixed charges including capitalized
interest
    
    $
    467.9
    
    
    $
    502.8
    
    
    $
    631.5Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    (3.4
    )
    
    
    0.6
    
    
    
    0.5Excess of fixed charges over earnings
    
    $
    (2,073.4
    )
    
    $
    (183.8
    )
    
    $
    (310.0
    )
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15586 and #15587; Pennsylvania Disaster Number PA-00084]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania dated 07/24/2018. *Incident:*
                         Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         06/20/2018 through 06/21/2018.
 DATES: Issued on 07/24/2018. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/24/2018. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/24/2019.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Allegheny, Westmoreland. *Contiguous Counties:* Pennsylvania: Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Cambria, Fayette, Indiana, Somerset, Washington. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.938Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
7.220Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.610Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.610Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15586 6 and for economic injury is 15587 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Pennsylvania. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: July 24, 2018. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-16544 Filed 8-1-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A LI A SG H A R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 71679 A ge nc yN o. A 058- 472- 408 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dM cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A l i A s ghar , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of P a ki s t an, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s r e m ova l or de ra nd de ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e m and. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo c ons t i tut i ona l c l a i m s a nd 

# FI LED JAN 06 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 71679 2 r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e m an d . Cast i l lo-P er ezv. I NS , 2 1 2 F . 3 d5 1 8 , 5 2 3 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 0 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng A s gha r ’ s m ot i on t o r e m a nd. A s gharc ont e nds tha thi s due pr oc e s s r i ght s w e r e vi ol a t e d bythe i nt e rpr e t a t i on of hi s m a s t e rc a l e ndarhe ar i ngs i nt o U r du, r a the rthan hi s na t i ve l angua ge of H i ndko, b u t h e h a s n o t e s tab lis h e dp r e ju d ic e r e s u ltin g f

r o m th e a lle g e dv io la tio n . See Pe r ez -La s to rv . I

NS , 208 F . 3d 773, 780 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng both e rr ora nd pr e j udi c e t o pr e va i l on adue pr oc e s s c l a i m ba s e d on an i nc om pe t e nt in te rp r e ta tio n ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### Charles F. BRYAN, Petitioner, v. Jack JUSTICE, Respondent.

No. 41185.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 21, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 247 So.2d 340.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. TYRONE L. FISHER, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 78 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 17th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s

request for oral argument is denied.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN DAVID CASTLE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

KEVIN A. SPEESE; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-16379

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01325-JCMLRL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 

John David Castle appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”)

and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403

FILED

JUN 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-16379

U.S. 388 (1971). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). 

Brady v. United States, 211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir. 2000); Fink v. Shedler, 192

F.3d 911, 913-14 (9th Cir. 1999). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Castle’s Bivens claim against defendant

Speese for failure to state a claim because Castle filed this action after the

applicable two-year statute of limitations expired. See Nev. Rev. Stat.

§ 11.190(4)(e); Van Strum v. Lawn, 940 F.2d 406, 408-10 (9th Cir. 1991) (personal

injury statute of limitations under state law applies to Bivens claims). Castle failed

to allege facts to establish a basis for tolling of the limitations period. See Nev.

Rev. Stat. § 11.250 (listing grounds for statutory tolling); Seino v. Employers Ins.

Co. of Nevada, 111 P.3d 1107, 1112 (Nev. 2005) (discussing equitable tolling); see

also Pesnell v. Arsenault, 543 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir. 2008) (tolling provisions

under state law apply to Bivens claims).

The district court properly dismissed Castle’s FTCA claim for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction because Castle failed to exhaust his administrative

remedies before filing this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a); Brady, 211 F.3d at

502.
3 09-16379

Castle’s remaining contentions, including those concerning the Alien Tort

Statute, are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 7 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Barrick Gold Corporation (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report). I, Gregory C. Wilkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906
of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  a)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: May 19, 2004
    /s/ Gregory C. WilkinsName:
    Gregory C. WilkinsTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Northeast Utilities (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Michael G. Morris,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John H.
Forsgren, Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael G. Morris
    (Signature)
    Michael G. Morris
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

March 21, 2003
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.   /s/Leon J. Olivier(Signature)Leon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHale(Signature)David R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date:  February 26, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Tommy Edward DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-793.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 24, 1968.

*42Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Michael Cohen, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before . CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

The defendant, Davis, was tried by jury, found guilty of robbery and sentenced to the state penitentiary for twenty years.

On appeal, he claims reversible error was committed “in that the court permitted the state to make an improper and highly prejudicial closing argument to the jury.”

The defendant took the stand during his trial and admitted on cross-examination that he had previously been convicted of three felonies and a misdemeanor. There was no evidence adduced on the specific type of crimes for which he admitted conviction.

On closing argument the assistant state attorney made the following pertinent remarks :

> * * * * • * *

> “ * * * The State has the burden even of protecting each and every man, every woman, every child and every boy. Here is a man who has come to you; he has gotten on the witness stand; he has testified, ‘Yes, I have been convicted of three felonies.’

> Now, he brought a gentleman in here who testified, ‘Yes, he was in prison from 1964 to March 3rd of 1967.’ Less *than 44 days after he got out of prison he is back robbing and doing the very same thing for which he was put in there the first time.*

> ‡ jfc jjí

> Gentlemen, if this man is sent out on the street to do the very same thing, the only question that can never be resolved, if you will, or put in the same position to ask, ‘Am I to be next *?’*” [Emphasis Added]

> 

These remarks were objected to by the defense but the objections were overruled by the trial judge.

We find the prosecutor’s remarks to have prejudiced the defendant’s right to a fair trial under the authority of Grant v. State, Fla.1967, 194 So.2d 612; Adams v. State, Fla.1966, 192 So.2d 762; Stewart v. State, Fla.1951, 51 So.2d 494; Simmons v. State, 139 Fla. 645, 190 So. 756 (1939); Carlile v. State, 129 Fla. 860, 176 So. 862 (1937); Akin v. State, 86 Fla. 564, 98 So. 609 (1923); and Ailer v. State, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 348.

Consequently, the judgment and sentence herein are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

It is So Ordered.
Exhibit 99.1




                           CERTIFICATION
                                OF
                          PSB HOLDINGS, INC.
             UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the
 "Company") certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
 of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report")
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

     Date:  August 13, 2002

                                   DAVID K. KOPPERUD
                                   David K. Kopperud
                                   President and CEO


     The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the
 "Company") certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
 of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report")
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

     Dated: August 14, 2002

                                   SCOTT M. CATTANACH
                                   Scott M. Cattanach
                                   Treasurer
                                   (Chief Financial Officer)
#### Mona RAMSER and Ralph Ramser, her husband, Appellants, v. John SMITH a/k/a John R. Smith, Appellee.

No. 70-1030.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 18, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 4, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2011278EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6058 — Bank of Scotland/Barclays Bank/KEW Green Hotels)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 278/01

On 28 February 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6058. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6058. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.3


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Cox Communications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996 of our report
dated February 21, 1997 (February 28, 1997 and March 1, 1997 as to Note 3),
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Teleport Communications Group
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996 and in the following Registration
Statements of Cox Communications, Inc.:
 
                              Form          File No.  
                              ------        --------- 
                               S-8           33-80993 
                               S-8           33-80995 
                               S-8           33-91506 
                               S-8           33-93148 
                               S-3          333-03351 
                               S-3          333-03766  
 



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
March 28, 1997