alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Clark A. Marcus,  Chief Executive Officer of Eye Care International, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

| (1) | the quarterly report on Form10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") which this statementaccompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |  the information containedin this Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofEye Care International, Inc..                                                         |

Dated: February 1, 2004

|  | /s/ Clark A. Marcus        Clark A. MarcusChief Executive Officer |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
" n
STATISTICS OF NEW YORK. 107
TABLE I—-POPULATION BY SURDIVISIONS OF COUNTIES—Continued,
40.—-8CHOHARIE COUNTY,
Wire, TREK COLORED,
ea, precincts, Warde, a AconeaayR
ForULAtION,
M, ¥ ‘out, mM
G40 4,24 13
418 4, 40H 2368
Carlislo. «. OM Uslt
Cobleskill... ur eet
Coneaville.. THe 1,588
78 1,48
Ae 2, 665
1a a. 04
BIS 1,748
ARAL 2 M7
ant 1, 666
12 2, 688
17 2, 203
1, 2805 2, 0%
aye 1,80
RIL 1,716
TOIL ace erect ence ew eeeeetewe seen eeees 16070 33, 8
1, 160 1, 008 2,918 3 2 s 2, 953
1, 0 13 M772 Ww 4 u 8, 786
a0 cu 1,814 1 1 2 1,616
1, hive Way 2201 uM 7 18 209
Laat 100 Qa i i uw 2, 248
1 uty 1,01 QO Py By BOO
9, 0 2, 120 A wre WG a 428
ny Abed Ay ih 1 oar l Lake
68 4,850 7 f 0 1,872
1,883 1,007 4, 730 20 30 05 3,798
44, 703 12,407 25, 200 a6 | 6 18h 25, 44h

Bradiord.
Cameron
Comphelt
Cuniatoo

Painted Post.
Prattsburgh,
Pauline

Ato TEUBEN COUNTY,

2, 08 1,056 3,709
BaD 7h Lard).
43,0623 2 1Ni7 a, 030
4,012 $158 1,07
at 760 1,700
OM H6L 1,175 |.
1,105 HOE 2, ad
aan SL Lato
erty mt 1, O84
1 ed Qt
vital Gag 1,400
ti ot
AST AG
707 07
1,457 4, 107
1, 605, 1,087 2
ed 77 A TAD fee ce eee ee fee were reas leeeeeeeeee 1,79
Ho 205 id 6 6 MW 680
1,050 1,005, BUM [orceceecseferecarececlernr sence
2,272 2, 002, 4, 304
1,44 1,24 2, 7H
wit ea aK
cere 7 1,4a4
36H 78
ar Ry ATA
960 Wt 1, Hu
1,050 J, IN 2, 06H
1, 068 1, 00 2, 067
{iH ro) 4,7
417 ABS WU
Tm rave 1471
on7 800 1,767
a, 000 0, 310

G8, 400 178 193, a7
#### Eliot C. FLETCHER, R. James Robbins and Frank S. Valenti, Appellants, v. SEVERUD-ELSTAD-KRUEGER ASSOCIATES, a New York partnership, Appellee.

No. 71-259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  Third Quarter 2004 and 2005




                                     Third      Third        90-Percent
Area                                quarter    quarter   Confidence Interval (&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>
                                     2004       2005    of 2005 rate  of difference

United States.....................      69.0       68.8        0.5         0.4

  Inside Core-Based
     Statistical Areas............       NA        67.3        1.3          NA
    In central cities.............       NA        54.0        1.0          NA
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs).....................       NA        76.3        1.2          NA
  Outside Core-Based
    Statistical Areas.............       NA        76.0        2.6          NA

 Northeast........................      64.4       65.1        0.9         0.8
 Midwest..........................      73.8       73.3        1.0         0.7
 South............................      71.0       70.6        0.9         0.6
 West.............................      64.7       64.2        1.2         0.8
    aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence interval is, in
    relation to the size of the estimate, the less reliable the estimate.
NA  Not Available.  Core-Based Statistical Area data for 2005 and later are not comparable to earlier data.  Beginning in first
quarter 2005, the Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey is using the new metropolitan and micropolitan definitions that were announced by
were announced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in June 2003, and were based on the application of the 2000 standards to Census 2000 data.
OMB announced updates as of December 2003, based on application of the 2000 standards to more recent Census Bureau estimates.  The December 2003
definitions are available at  http://www.census.gov./population/www/estimates/metrodef.html.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1807 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1807

 To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the corn ethanol mandate for 
                renewable fuel, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 12 (legislative day, December 11), 2013

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Coburn, Mrs. Hagan, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
 Toomey, Mr. Flake, Mr. Corker, Mr. Burr, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Manchin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the corn ethanol mandate for 
                renewable fuel, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Corn Ethanol Mandate Elimination Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CORN ETHANOL MANDATE FOR RENEWABLE FUEL.

    (a) Removal of Table.--Section 211(o)(2)(B)(i) of the Clean Air Act 
(42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(2)(B)(i)) is amended by striking subclause (I).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 211(o)(2)(B) of the Clean Air 
Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(2)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by redesignating subclauses (II) through (IV) 
                as subclauses (I) through (III), respectively;
                    (B) in subclause (I) (as so redesignated), by 
                striking ``of the volume of renewable fuel required 
                under subclause (I),''; and
                    (C) in subclauses (II) and (III) (as so 
                redesignated), by striking ``subclause (II)'' each 
                place it appears and inserting ``subclause (I)''; and
            (2) in clause (v), by striking ``clause (i)(IV)'' and 
        inserting ``clause (i)(III)''.
    (c) Administration.--Nothing in this section or the amendments made 
by this section affects the volumes of advanced biofuel, cellulosic 
biofuel, or biomass-based diesel that are required under section 211(o) 
of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)).
    (d) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary to 
carry out the amendments made by this section.
    (e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11272.

#### Crawford *v.*Crawford, et al.

Decided November 16, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Hancock county.

*Messrs. McConica & Dwiggins*and *Mr. J. C.*Biller, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Axline &*Betts, for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.
#### Anna Mabel WEAVER, Petitioner, v. DEAUVILLE HOTEL et al., Respondents.

No. 43878.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ„ concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1609 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1609

 To amend title 14, United States Code, to authorize the Commandant of 
 the United States Coast Guard to lease tidelands and submerged lands 
  under control of the Coast Guard for periods longer than five years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2013

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 14, United States Code, to authorize the Commandant of 
 the United States Coast Guard to lease tidelands and submerged lands 
  under control of the Coast Guard for periods longer than five years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Submerged Lands 
Transportation Development Act''.

SEC. 2. LEASE OF TIDELANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS UNDER CONTROL OF THE 
              COAST GUARD FOR PERIODS LONGER THAN FIVE YEARS.

    Section 93 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Lease of Tidelands and Submerged Lands.--(1) Notwithstanding 
subsection (a)(13), a lease described in paragraph (2) may be for such 
term in excess of five years as the Commandant considers appropriate.
    ``(2) A lease referred to in paragraph (1) is a lease of the 
following:
            ``(A) Tidelands under the control of the Coast Guard.
            ``(B) Submerged lands under the control of the Coast 
        Guard.''.
                                 <all>
```
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  Fourth Quarter 1998 and 1997

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                    Fourth    Fourth   Standard
                                   quarter   quarter   error on  Standard     1998
Type                                 1998      1997      1998    error on   Percent
                                   estimate  estimate  estimate difference  of total

All housing units.................  117,589   115,892       235        334       100

  Occupied........................  104,035   102,624       245        347        88
    Owner occupied................   69,097    67,424       242        342        59
    Renter occupied...............   34,938    35,200       197        280        30

  Vacant..........................   13,554    13,268       132        186        12
    Year-round vacant.............   10,514    10,078       117        164         9
      For rent....................    2,978     2,966        64         90         3
      For sale only...............    1,242     1,187        41         58         1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy..........      909       813        35         49         1
      Held off market.............    5,385     5,112        85        119         5
        For occasional use........    1,868     1,805        51         71         2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence elsewhere.      920       793        36         49         1
        For other reasons.........    2,597     2,514        60         84         2

    Seasonal vacant...............    3,040     3,190        64         92         3
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.4

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements 
Nos. 33-80993, 33-80995, 33-91506 and 33-93148 on Form S-8 and in Registration
Statements Nos. 333-03351 and 333-03766 on Form S-3 of Cox Communications, Inc.
of our report dated February 7, 1997 (relating to the combined consolidated
financial statements of Cox Communications PCS, L.P. and Cox California PCS,
Inc., development stage enterprises) appearing in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K of Cox Communications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 27, 1997
260 La. 1116

#### BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF the PORT OF NEW ORLEANS, an Agency of the State of Louisiana v. SPLENDOUR SHIPPING & ENTERPRISES COMPANY, Inc., et al.

No. 52156.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1972.

In re: Splendour Shipping & Enterprises Co., Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 255 So.2d 869.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from the granting of writs. See La.Const. Art. Ill, Sec. 35.
262 La. 1097

#### Barbara Anne Klein WHITE v. Norman George KLEIN, Sr.

No. 52664.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1972.

In re: Norman George Klein, Sr. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 263 So.2d 496.

Writ denied: No error of law.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. Collection of this 16 year old “debt” “charge” for child support out of the assets of the second community offends my sense of justice. Fazzio v. Krieger, 226 La. 511, 76 So.2d 713 (1954) is equivocal in its alternative holding and may be distinguished or it should be limited in application in light of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Green, 252 La. 227, 210 So.2d 328 (1968).
EPA Region 4 “All States” Meeting

December 8, 2011

EPA OUST and EPA Region 4 met with representatives of each of the states in EPA Region 4. 

During this meeting EPA and the States had one session where they talked about the proposed 

changes to the UST regulations. EPA handed out the comparison document from the EPA 

OUST website (www.epa.gov/oust) which explains the 16 changes and how they compare to the 

previous regulations. EPA answered questions about the proposed changes.

In attendance were: 

Bill Truman EPA R-4

Larry Sorrell South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 

Curt Johnson AL Department of Env Mgmt

Martha Martin MS Dept. of Env Quality

Dorothy Malaier AL Dept of Env Mgmt

Lee Monts South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 

Donna Rogers MS Dept. of Env Quality

Rick Strickfaden GA Env Protection Div

Darnell Manning GA Env Protection Div

Lynn Chambers MS Dept. of Env Quality

Bob Davies North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 

Edward Winner Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection 

Lee Davis AL Department of Env Mgmt

Grover Nicholson North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 

Derrick Williams GA Env Protection Div

Eric Cathcart South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Lisa Lewis GA Env Protection Div

Stephen Kent Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection 

Sarah Jon Gaddis Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection 

Stan Boyd TN Department of Environment and Conservation 

Sonja Massey AL Department of Env Mgmt

Chris Doll South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Mihir Mehta South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Steve Burton EPA R-4

FL Department of Environmental Protection (call-in)
# C_2011340EN.01000101.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/1

---

2011/C 340/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 331, 12.11.2011

OJ C 331, 12.11.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 319, 29.10.2011

OJ C 311, 22.10.2011

OJ C 305, 15.10.2011

OJ C 298, 8.10.2011

OJ C 290, 1.10.2011

OJ C 282, 24.9.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-11-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       6,054,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,114,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,169,597
<PP&E>                                      36,002,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,171,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,355,849
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,815,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,171,597
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### CITY OF CAPE CORAL, Florida, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. GULF COAST FARMS, INC., etc., Appellee.

No. 43210.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 5, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CALVIN LEONARD WORTHEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:08-cr-00010-MR-6)

Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 13, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Leonard Worthen, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Leonard Worthen appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Worthen, 1:08-cr-00010-MR-6 (W.D.N.C. June 6, 2012). 

We deny Worthen’s motion for appointment of counsel. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and for
the period then ended.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thos E. Capps                                       
|Thos. E. Capps Chief Executive Officer February 28, 2005



|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas N.Chewning                                                                    
|Thomas N. Chewning Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer February 28,
2005
#### Jimmy James BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-128.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 19, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; E. Summers Sheffey, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.