alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.3
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, David G. Zahka, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Talk America Holdings, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)  [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)]
 
 c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 May 7, 2004
 
 /s/ David G. Zahka
 David G. Zahka
 Chief Financial Officer
No. 12085.

#### Hirsh et al., Partners, *v.*The State of Ohio.

Decided February 15, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Flancock county.

*Mr. G. W. Ross,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. John E. Priddy*and *Mr. Charles A. Blackford,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Spear, Davis, Spiauck. and Price, JJ., concur. Crew, J., dissents.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LSP-COTTAGE
GROVE, L.P.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,534
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 262,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,786
<BONDS>                                        155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   262,334
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,783
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,453
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,453
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Alphonso WIGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 3, 1972.

Alphonso Wiggins, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Farmer v. Beto, 446 F.2d 1357 (5th Cir., 1971).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Tower One Wireless Corp.: Exhibit 10.12 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com


    

    CREDIT AGREEMENT

    This credit agreement is made on the day of March 31, 2017 by and among, HUGO OCHOA, a resident of Miami, Florida. Hereinafter known as "Lender".

    and

    TOWER ONE WIRELESS 600 - 535 Howe Street. ,Vancouver BC. V6C 2Z7 (Canada) Hereinafter known as "Borrower".

    Borrower and Lender shall collectively be known herein as "the Parties". In determining the rights and duties of the Parties under the Credit Agreement, the entire document must be read as a whole.

    CREDIT TERMS

    The Borrower and Lender, hereby further set forth their rights and obligations to one another under the Credit Agreement and agreed to be legal bound as follows:

    Loan Payment Terms: Borrower to pay $300.000 US Dollars to Lender, plus 24% annual interest for the life of the loan. Payment of the principal loan and accrued interests shall be due 120days from the date of execution of this agreement. If the loan is not paid on the due date, the Borrower will pay a monthly penalty fee of 10 % of the principal loan, and continue paying the accrued interest. This Loan will also be repayable in 360 Days from reception of Wire. In addition to the Interest Rate the Tower One Wireless Inc. will also issue 300,000 Stock Options at a Deemed Value of .25 (CAD). The term of these Options is 24 Months from Issue Date.

    Demand by Lender: This is a "demand" loan agreement under which borrower is required to pay back in full the entire outstanding Loan Balance within 15 days of receiving a written demand from Lender or full repayment of the Loan Balance. Delivery of the written notice by Lender to Borrower via U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail shall constitute prima facie evidence of delivery.

    Method of Loan Payment: The Borrower shall make all payments called for under this loan agreement by wire transfer, according to the information included on EXHIBIT A.

    Default: The occurrence of any of the following events shall constitute a Default by the borrower of the terms of this loan agreement:

    	Borrower's failure to pay any amount due as principal or interest on the date required under the loan agreement
	Borrower seeks an order of relief under the Federal Bankruptcy laws
	Borrower becomes insolvent


    

    Exclusive Jurisdiction for Suit in Case of Breach: The parties, by entering into this agreement, submit to Jurisdiction in Canada for adjudication of any disputes and/or claims between the parties under this agreement. Furthermore the parties hereby agree that the courts of Vancouver, Canada shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any disputes between the party's relatives to this agreement, whether said disputes sound in contract, tort or other areas of the law.

    State Laws: this agreement shall be interpreted under, and governed by, the laws of Canada

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF and acknowledging acceptance and agreement of the foregoing, Borrower and Lender affix their signatures hereto.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conolog Corporation
(the "Company") certifies to his knowledge that:

      (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
July 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 13, 2003


                                          /s/ ROBERT BENOU
                                          ----------------
                                          (Robert Benou)
                                          Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# A
```

[Federal Register: November 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 226)]
[Notices]               
[Page 71669-71670]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24no10-58]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Friday, December 3, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EST.

Place:  624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Program Planning.
     Approval of School Choice, the Blaine Amendments and Anti-
Catholicism Briefing Report.
     Approval of Eminent Domain Briefing Concept Paper & 
Scheduling of Briefing.
     Update on FY 2011 Cy Pres Enforcement Report.
     Update on Status of Briefing on Disparate Impact in School 
Discipline Policies.
     Update on Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts College 
Admissions--Some of the discussion of this

[[Page 71670]]

agenda item may be held in closed session.
III. State Advisory Committee Issues.
     North Carolina SAC.
     Vermont SAC.
     Wisconsin SAC.
     Update on Status of Remaining SACs to Recharter.
IV. Approval of Minutes of November 19 Meeting.
V. Announcements.
VI. Adjourn.

Contact Person for Further Information: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116. Persons with a 
disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the 
hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days 
prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

    Dated: November 22, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-29777 Filed 11-22-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Second Quarter 1997 and 1996





                               Second     Second    Standard    Standard

Age of householder            Quarter    Quarter    error on    error on

                                1997       1996     1997 rate  difference



United States..............      65.7       65.4        0.2         0.2



    Less than 25 years.....      18.7       19.2        0.6         0.9

    25 to 29 years.........      35.0       33.7        0.6         0.8

    30 to 34 years.........      51.6       53.7        0.6         0.8

    35 to 39 years.........      62.5       62.2        0.5         0.7

    40 to 44 years.........      70.3       68.9        0.5         0.7

    45 to 49 years.........      73.8       74.4        0.5         0.7

    50 to 54 years.........      77.8       77.0        0.5         0.8

    55 to 59 years.........      79.8       79.6        0.6         0.8

    60 to 64 years.........      80.8       80.4        0.6         0.9

    65 to 69 years.........      81.9       82.0        0.6         0.8

    70 to 74 years.........      81.9       81.8        0.6         0.9

    75 years and over......      75.9       75.1        0.5         0.7



      Less than 35 years...      38.6       39.3        0.4         0.5

      35 to 44 years.......      66.3       65.5        0.4         0.5

      45 to 54 years.......      75.6       75.5        0.4         0.5

      55 to 64 years.......      80.3       80.0        0.4         0.6

      65 years and over....      79.1       78.9        0.3         0.5

    

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
EPA Meeting on UST Regs at National Tanks Conference
March 19 , 2012

EPA staff gave a brief explanation of the proposed changes to the UST regulations, explained how to comment on the proposal

, and answered questions from states, tank owners, manufacturers, and other interested stakeholders.

**Attendees:**

Linda Gerber, EPA Bob Renkes, PEI Donnie Greenwalt, Wallis Companies Kevin Kyle, The Wills Group, Inc. Josh Worth, Wawa, I nc Bob Minissale, Cro mpco Ed Kubinsky , Crompco Jim Howard, Hess Corp Patty L eonhardt, Thorntons Inc. Bjorn Brinkman, EPA R7 Brian Patterson, MVI David Dodson, Sheetz
Miche lle Johnston, Warren Rogers Assoc iates William Jones, Warren Rogers Associates Kevin Keegan, Tanknology
Vi ncent Pereira, Guam EPA Todd Ferguson, Tank

n ology Tom Kenney , EPA Region 5
Shawn Suri , Oneida Tribe of WI Brian Knapp, API Kris Shiffer, PA DEP Margaret Stockdale, EPA Region 7 Johanna Griscik, Carmax Auto Superstores Inc. Mike Morgan, Practical American Safet y Solutions Bill Truman, EPA Region 4 Erik Sirs, EPA Region 10 Josh Presley , Chickasaw Nation Chuck Tillman, Choctaw Nation Patrick Vuchetich, Williams and Company Ed Haselwood, Haselwood I nc. Claudette Reed, EPA R3 Erin Knighton, EPA Lee Davis, AL DE M Paul Kane, P.E.S. Alan Cubberley , Circle K Rainier Viera, Circle KDann y Murdaugh, PMI

Ken Koon, MO DNR

He a t her Peters, MO DNR Dary l Moore, National Institutes of Health Don Gilson, Gilson Environmental Russ Brauksieck, NY DEC Ron Fulenchek, 7

- Eleven Inc

.
Joyce Ide UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

November 22,2013

ShastaLake Gateway Library 4150 Ashy Court ShastaLake, California 96019 

### Subject:

Dear Ms. Ide: 

### Request to retain public documents atthe Shasta Lake Gateway Library for public inspection

Please retain the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's documents sent to you on November 7, 2013 at the ShastaLake Gateway Library for at least 90 days, rather than sixty (60) days as stated inthe previous letter dated November 7, 2013, for public inspection. These documents containthe preliminary decision for the prol'osed Clean Air Act Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration permit for the expansion ofthe Sierra Pacific Industries facility located inAnderson, California. We have extended the public comment period for this preliminary decision. A copy ofthe public notice regarding the extended public comment period is enclosed. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 orkelly.shaheerah@epa.gov ifyouhave any questions.

Enclosure Shaheerah Kelly, Env onmental Engineer AirDivision, Permits Office
# C_2011336EN.01001801.xml

| 17.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/18

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2011/C 336/12

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition:

EPSO/AST/117/11 — Assistants (AST 1) in the secretarial field for the following languages: (EL) Greek, (EN) English, (ET) Estonian, (FI) Finnish, (FR) French, (GA) Irish, (HU) Hungarian, (IT) Italian

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
# C_2012029EN.01001101.xml

| 2.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/11

---

Call for proposals under the 2012 Ideas work programme of the Seventh EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2012/C 29/08

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2012 Ideas work programme of the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call. Call deadlines and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the Participant Portal website.

Ideas Work Programme

Ideas Work Programme

| Call Title | The ERC Proof of Concept Grant |
| --- | --- |
| Call Identifier | ERC-2012-PoC |

Call Title

The ERC Proof of Concept Grant

Call Identifier

ERC-2012-PoC

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2011) 4961 of 19 July 2011.

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2011) 4961 of 19 July 2011.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the relevant European Commission website:

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/appmanager/participants/portal

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jerry R. BOYKIN.

No. 62391.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: The State of Louisiana, through District Attorney John M. Mamoulides, ap*1300plying for remedial writs to the 24th Judicial District Court. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ denied.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., would grant the writ.
<PAGE>
                                                       EXHIBIT 21


                UNIVIEW TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Name                                    State of Incorporation
----                                    ----------------------
uniView Technologies Advanced
     Systems Group, Inc.                Texas

uniView Technologies Products
     Group, Inc.                        Texas

Video Management, Inc.                  Texas
     Network America, Inc.              Oklahoma
     CompuNet Support Systems, Inc.     Texas

Corporate Network Solutions, L.C.       Texas (limited liability company)

Curtis Mathes Corporation               Delaware

uniView Marketing Corporation           Texas

uniView Xpressway Corporation           Texas

Warranty Repair Corporation             Texas
#### Haskel LIBERMAN and Leatrice Liberman, Appellants, v. GABLES LIGHTING FIXTURE COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-788.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 21, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 20, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Table 9.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the

                United States:  2004 and 2005



(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)





                                                            90-Percent

                                              Confidence Interval (+/     2005

Type                             2004  2,005    of 2005       of      Percent

                            estimate estimate  Estimate   difference of total



All housing units...........  122,187  123,925       (X)         (X)      100



  Occupied..................  106,588  108,231        263         247      87

    Owner occupied..........   73,575   74,553        566         482      60

    Renter occupied.........   33,013   33,678        477         422      27



  Vacant....................   15,599   15,694        278         254      13

    Year-round vacant.......   11,884   11,916        289         263      10

      For rent..............    3,802    3,721        136         141       3

      For sale only.........    1,307    1,451         64          71       1

      Rented or sold,

      awaiting occupancy....      991    1,060         47          61       1

      Held off market.......    5,784    5,684        207         191       5

        For occasional use..    1,967    1,884        121         113       2

        Temporarily occupied

        by persons with

        usual residence else    1,068    1,128         94          85       1

        For other reasons...    2,749    2,672        144         133       2



    Seasonal vacant.........    3,715    3,778        192         179       3





(X) Not applicable.  Since the number of housing units is set equal to an independent national measure,

there is no sampling error, and hence no confidence interval.

\1 A 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence interval

is, in relation to the size of the estiamte, the less reliable the estimate.
No. 11169.

#### The State, for the use and benefit of Richland county, by Huston, Prosecuting Attorney, *v.*Esswein et al.

Decided January 25, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Richland county.

*Mr. Lewis Brucker; Mr. G. M. Sidles*and *Mr. W. H. Bowers,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. George E. Crane; Mr. John J. Adams; Messrs. Vorys, Safer, Seymour & Pease; Mr. C. H. Workman*and *Mr. S. M. Douglass,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, Spear and Shauck, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I,
        David
        G. Zahka, Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. have reviewed
        Talk America Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
        March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) and, based on the inquiries I have made or caused
        to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief Executive
        Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., I hereby certify that:
 
 (i)
        the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (ii)
        the
        information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America Holdings,
        Inc.
 
 
 
 /s/
        David G. Zahka
 David
        G.
        Zahka
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 May
        10,
        2006