alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES OF CALMAT CO.
---------------------------------
(100% owned and California corporation, unless otherwise indicated)


Allied Concrete & Materials Co. (ARIZONA)
Allied Concrete, Inc. (ARIZONA) (Subsidiary of Allied Concrete & Materials Co.)
CalMat Co. of Arizona (ARIZONA)
CalMat Co. of New Mexico (NEW MEXICO)
CalMat Land Co.
CalMat Leasing Co.  (ARIZONA)
CalMat of Central California
CalMat Properties Co.
CC Plaza Co. (Subsidiary of CalMat Properties Co.)
Mission Valley Development Co. (Subsidiary of CalMat Properties Co.)
River Vista Development Co. (Subsidiary of CalMat Properties Co.)
Kirst Construction Co., Inc.
Azusa Rock, Inc. (Subsidiary of Kirst Construction Co., Inc.)
Palomar Transit Mix Co.
Reliance Land Co.
Reliance Transport Co.
Rio Norte Este Co.
River Bend Corp.
Sanger Rock and Sand
Sloan Canyon Sand Co.
Triangle Rock Products, Inc.
Western Environmental Contracting, Inc.
Western Thermal Soils Co.
Exhibit 23.




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 2-86602, 33-15775, 33-37567, 33-45482 and 333-01465
of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration
Statement No. 33-59582 on Form S-3 and    Registration Statement No.
333-62469 on Form S-4      of our report dated September 9, 1998,
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. for the year ended July 31,
1998.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
October 21, 1998
# C_2011265EN.01000101.xml

| 9.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 September 2011

2011/C 265/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4044 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 108,41 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4478 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87670 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9556 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2135 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5585 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,405 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 276,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2374 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2515 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4815 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3212 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3825 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9476 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6815 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7006 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 509,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0704 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,9629 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4885 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 023,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2055 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,573 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,5153 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,160 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3221 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5311 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,8760 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4044

JPY

Japanese yen

108,41

DKK

Danish krone

7,4478

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87670

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9556

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2135

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5585

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,405

HUF

Hungarian forint

276,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2374

RON

Romanian leu

4,2515

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4815

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3212

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3825

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9476

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6815

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7006

KRW

South Korean won

1 509,33

ZAR

South African rand

10,0704

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,9629

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4885

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 023,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2055

PHP

Philippine peso

59,573

RUB

Russian rouble

41,5153

THB

Thai baht

42,160

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3221

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5311

INR

Indian rupee

64,8760

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
##### 



Exhibit 12 CNF INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS (LOSS) TO FIXED CHARGES
Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    39,695
    
    
    $
    29,597
    
    
    $
    22,825
    
    
    $
    27,009
    
    
    $
    29,967Capitalized interest
    
    
    173
    
    
    
    241
    
    
    
    455
    
    
    
    864
    
    
    
    3,082Amortization of debt expense
    
    
    3,952
    
    
    
    1,118
    
    
    
    1,114
    
    
    
    857
    
    
    
    837Dividend requirement on Series B
Preferred Stock (1)
    
    
    9,797
    
    
    
    10,072
    
    
    
    10,331
    
    
    
    10,606
    
    
    
    10,808Interest component of
rental expense (2)
    
    
    6,590
    
    
    
    8,976
    
    
    
    8,974
    
    
    
    12,675
    
    
    
    9,830Fixed Charges
    
    $
    60,207
    
    
    $
    50,004
    
    
    $
    43,699
    
    
    $
    52,011
    
    
    $
    54,524Earnings (Loss):Income (Loss) from continuing
operations before taxes (3)
    
    $
    246,823
    
    
    $
    197,517
    
    
    $
    152,328
    
    
    $
    85,007
    
    
    $
    212,054(Income) Loss from equity-method investment
    
    
    (18,253
    )
    
    
    (20,718
    )
    
    
    (18,188
    )
    
    
    9,415
    
    
    
    560228,570
    
    
    
    176,799
    
    
    
    134,140
    
    
    
    94,422
    
    
    
    212,614Fixed charges
    
    
    60,207
    
    
    
    50,004
    
    
    
    43,699
    
    
    
    52,011
    
    
    
    54,524Capitalized interest
    
    
    (173
    )
    
    
    (241
    )
    
    
    (455
    )
    
    
    (864
    )
    
    
    (3,082
    )Preferred dividend requirements (4)
    
    
    (9,797
    )
    
    
    (10,072
    )
    
    
    (10,331
    )
    
    
    (10,606
    )
    
    
    (10,808
    )$
    278,807
    
    
    $
    216,490
    
    
    $
    167,053
    
    
    $
    134,963
    
    
    $
    253,248Ratio
    
    
    4.6
    x
    
    
    4.3
    x
    
    
    3.8
    x
    
    
    2.6
    x
    
    
    4.6
    x
   (1)
    
    Dividends on shares of the Series B cumulative convertible preferred stock
are used to pay debt service on notes issued by the CNFs Thrift and Stock
Plan.(2)
    
    Estimate of the interest portion of lease payments.(3)
    
    For the year ended December 31, 2001, Menlo Worldwide Logistics results
included a $47.5 million loss from the business failure of a customer.(4)
    
    Preferred stock dividend requirements included in Fixed Charges but not
deducted in the determination of Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Before Income Taxes.
DISTRICT OIFICE: 909 DECKER DRIVE BAYTOWN, TEXAS 77520 (832) 556-2002 FAX (832) 556-0319 CAPITOL OFFICE: P0. Box 2910 AusrIN, TEXAS 78768-2910 (512) 463-0733 (512) 463-1323 FAX TOLL FREE: 1(866) 423-5987

Ms. Lisa Jackson
Administrator of USEPA USEPA Headquarters 12000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
MailCode: 11O1A Washington, DC 20460

Re: Letter in Support of Wise County's Petition for Reconsideration of EPA's Designation of Wise County as Nonattainment for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS.

Dear Administrator Jackson:

I am writing to express my concern about EPA's recent decision to designate Wise County nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and include that county in the Dallas-Fort Worth ozone nonattainment area. EPA's decision was announced shortly after the discovery of comments by then-EPA Region 6 Administrator, Al Armendariz, stating that EPA's enforcement goal was to "crucify" the oil and gas industry. I am concerned about the impact of this decision on the citizens of Wise County and the precedent this decision may set for future Texas area designations.

Recently, Wise County has filed a petition with EPA requesting that EPA reconsider that designation. I would urge you to give careful consideration to that petition. As you know, Wise County does not have a federal ozone monitor. As such, in order to designate Wise County nonattainment EPA must demonstrate that emission sources in Wise County make a meaningful contribution to the DFW nonattainment area's ozone exceedances. EPA relies heavily upon HYSPLIT modeling analysis in finding a contribution. Yet HYSPLIT modeling only estimates hourly positions of wind parcels and is not capable of directly measuring the transport of ozone from one area to another. The fact that back trajectory analysis is of limited use in tracking ozone contribution and transport was made clear in EPA's Technical Support Document supporting its 2004 area designations for the 1997 ground-level ozone NAAQS:

*ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, CHAIR*

*COUNTY AFFAIRSk

### While trajectory analysis can be helpful it has significant limitations as it does not

take into consideration atmospheric chemical processes, the injection of emissions, or the deposition of material along the trajectory path.

Technical Support for State and Tribal Air Quality Designations and Classifications, April 2004, Chapter 3, at 3-202 (http :Ilwww.epa. govlozonedesi gnationsl 

### 1 997standards/tech .htm).

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has done a commendable job of demonstrating that Wise County emissions rarely, if ever, contribute to ozone violations in other counties. TCEQ has also presented evidence showing that urban portions of the Dallas-Fort Worth area contribute to ozone levels in Wise County, not the other way around. EPA has not provided sufficient justification to utilize a wind analysis in this case, when it has disregarded that same wind analysis in other instances.

For all of these reasons, I request that you consider Wise County's Petition for Reconsideration carefully and urge you take a fresh look at all facts presented to you in the reconsideration

process.

cc: Sam Coleman, Region 6 Acting Administrator
# C_2011278EN.01000102.xml

| 22.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6185 — Flabeg Holding/Schott Solar CPS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 278/02

On 14 September 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6185. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6185. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Clarence ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-333.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1807 

To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the corn ethanol mandate for 

renewable fuel, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12 (legislative day, DECEMBER 11), 2013 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. HAGAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. 

TOOMEY, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. CORKER, Mr. BURR, Mr. RISCH, and Mr. 

MANCHIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the corn ethanol 

mandate for renewable fuel, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corn Ethanol Mandate 

5 Elimination Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1807 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CORN ETHANOL MANDATE FOR 

2 RENEWABLE FUEL. 

3 (a) REMOVAL OF TABLE.—Section 211(o)(2)(B)(i) of 

4 the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(2)(B)(i)) is amend5 ed by striking subclause (I). 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 

7 211(o)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 7545(o)(2)(B)) is amended— 

9 (1) in clause (i)— 

10 (A) by redesignating subclauses (II) 

11 through (IV) as subclauses (I) through (III), 

12 respectively; 

13 (B) in subclause (I) (as so redesignated), 

14 by striking ‘‘of the volume of renewable fuel re15 quired under subclause (I),’’; and 

16 (C) in subclauses (II) and (III) (as so re17 designated), by striking ‘‘subclause (II)’’ each 

18 place it appears and inserting ‘‘subclause (I)’’; 

19 and 

20 (2) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘clause (i)(IV)’’ 

21 and inserting ‘‘clause (i)(III)’’. 

22 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—Nothing in this section or the 

23 amendments made by this section affects the volumes of 

24 advanced biofuel, cellulosic biofuel, or biomass-based diesel 

25 that are required under section 211(o) of the Clean Air 

26 Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1807 IS

1 (d) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

3 the Environmental Protection Agency shall promulgate 

4 such regulations as are necessary to carry out the amend5 ments made by this section. 

6 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall take effect on the date that is 180 days 

8 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          90,224
<SECURITIES>                                    40,254
<RECEIVABLES>                                       29
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,723
<PP&E>                                          15,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,263)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,549
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   253
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,681)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: Bradley R. Busby

To: Flagg, MichaelA

Subject: ADEQ Notice of Intent Addition...

Date: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:04:34 AM

Michael,

This email is to serve as an Notice of Intent to submit additional Exceptional Events to those

included in ADEQ’s Sept. 11, 2013 NOI Letter.  One Rillito event was erroneously left out of the

Sept. 11, 2013 letter, and three additional Maricopa County exceptional Events were not included

in the original NOI letter due to the timing of their occurring in August and October.

Rillito

-10/4/2011

Maricopa County

-8/17/2013

-8/26/2013

-10/9/2013

We plan on including these events in the submittal of the rest of the exceedance dates discussed in

the original 9/11/2013 NOI letter, during the first quarter of 2014.  Please let me know if you have

any questions or concerns regarding these additional events that ADEQ plans to pursue.

Brad Busby

Evaluation Unit Manager

ADEQ - Air Quality - Assessment

1110 W. Washington Street

Phoenix, AZ 85007

www.azdeq.gov

Office: 602-771-7676

Email: bb4@azdeq.gov

NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended

only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged

and confidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law,

and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this email and its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the person named

above by reply e-mail, and then delete the original e-mail. Thank you.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header History
 You are here: Census.gov ›
  History ›
  Through the Decades › Fast Facts Skip top of page navigation
 History Main
      Agency History
        Director Biographies
          Census Facilities
          Suitland, MD
          Notable Alumni
      Innovations
        Data Collection
          Technology
      Programs
        Agriculture
          Demographic
          Housing
          Economic
          Geography
          Governments
      Through the Decades
        Fast Facts
          Overview
          Index of Questions
          Questionnaires
          Census Instructions
      Genealogy
        Decennial Census Records
          Other Resources
      Reference
        Data@Museums
          Artifacts
          Lesson Plans
          Legislation
          Maps
          Oral Histories
          Privacy & Confidentiality
          Apportionment
          Publications
 Home Page Archive
        2024
          2023
          2022
          2021
          2020
          2019
          2018
          2017
          2016
          2015
          2014    
      FAQs
        Genealogy
          Agency History
          Demographic
          Economic
          Governments
          Agriculture
          Geography
          Innovations
          Miscellaneous
  In this Section: 2020 Fast Facts
  2010 Fast Facts
  2000 Fast Facts
  1990 Fast Facts
  1980 Fast Facts
  1970 Fast Facts
  1960 Fast Facts
  1950 Fast Facts
  1940 Fast Facts
  1930 Fast Facts
  1920 Fast Facts
  1910 Fast Facts
  1900 Fast Facts
  1890 Fast Facts
  1880 Fast Facts
  1870 Fast Facts
  1860 Fast Facts
  1850 Fast Facts
  1840 Fast Facts
  1830 Fast Facts
  1820 Fast Facts
  1810 Fast Facts
  1800 Fast Facts
  1790 Fast Facts
 Fast Facts Censuses are not conducted in a vacuum.  They occur amidst internal and external crisis, shifts in cultural interests, and events that become "defining moments" for each generation.  Census data reflect the growth of the population as well as the changing values and interests of the American people. Fast Facts provides a portrait of the United States both statistically and culturally.  In addition to census-related statistics, the innovations, events, and icons of each decade are highlighted.  Each page illustrates the thought and culture of the population counted during each decade's census.  American IndianBabe RuthPicassoAutomobiles and AirplaneStar WarsMarx BrothersMartin Luther King
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                               AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS
                                       OF
                         CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT BANCORP


I, ANNETTE BERTOLINI, CERTIFY THAT:

1.   I AM THE DULY ELECTED AND ACTING SECRETARY OF CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT
     BANCORP, (THE "COMPANY"), A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION.

2.   THE FOLLOWING IS A TRUE AND COMPLETE COPY OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTED AT A
     MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY HELD MAY 18,1999.

     "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE FOLLOWING BE ADDED TO THE
     BEGINNING OF PARAGRAH 4, SECTION 2.8 OF THE BYLAWS OF THE COMPANY:

     "PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTIONS 301.5 AND 708, AND ANY
     SUCCESSOR STATUTES, SO LONG AS THE CORPORATION REMAINS A `LISTED
     CORPORATION' AS DEFINED UNDER CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 301.5 OR ANY
     SUCCESSOR STATUTES, THE CORPORATION DOES NOT PERMIT CUMULATIVE VOTING FOR
     THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS. HOWEVER, IN THE EVENT THAT THE CORPORATION
     SHOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A "LISTED CORPORATION" AS DEFINED UNDER CORPORATIONS
     CODE SECTION 301.5 OR ANY SUCCESSOR STATUE, AND SUBJECT TO...[RETAIN THE
     REMAINING LANGUAGE OF PARAGRAPH 4.]

3.   THE RESOLUTION SET FORTH ABOVE HAS NOT BEEN MODIFIED OR RESCINDED AND IS IN
     FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

EXECUTED THIS 18TH, DAY OF MAY 1999, IN YUBA CITY, CALIFORNIA.



/s/ Annette Bertolini
----------------------------
ANNETTE BERTOLINI
CORPORATE SECRETARY



SEAL

                                       1