alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011312EN.01000901.xml

| 25.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/9

---

Call for proposals under the 2012 Ideas work programme of the Seventh EC Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities

2011/C 312/04

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2012 Ideas work programme of the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call. The call deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the Participant Portal website.

Ideas work programme:

Ideas work programme:

| Call title | ERC Synergy Grant |
| --- | --- |
| Call identifier | ERC-2012-SyG |

Call title

ERC Synergy Grant

Call identifier

ERC-2012-SyG

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2011) 4961 of 19 July 2011.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the relevant European Commission website:

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/appmanager/participants/portal

---
2 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A 

ININANtaidail EIN=IIIINERVEMEXIMEMINIMINCE 

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge 

Frank Milford Peck 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk
Exhibit 4.8


 





 






    	 	 	 



     


    

 











The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on
the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


 


	TEN COM - as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -	 	Custodian	 
	TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties	 	 	(Cust)	 	(Minor)
	JT TEN -    as joint tenants with rights of survivorship and not as tenants in common	 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
	 	 	 		 
	 	 	 	(State)
	 	 	UNIF TRF MIN ACT -	 	Custodian (until age)	 
	 	 	 	(Cust)	 
	 	 	 	 	under Uniform Transfers
	 	 	 	(Minor)		 
	 	 	 	to Minors Act		 
	 	 	 	 	(State)


 


Additional abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list.


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ____________________________ hereby sell,
assign and transfer unto


 


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER


IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE ____________________________ 





 





 






(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS,
INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)





 


 






 





 



 





 






Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate,
and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


 





 






Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within
named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


	Dated	 	 


 


	 	x



	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	x




	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	NOTICE:	THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

SADIE MARIE TODD,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 22

- 30064

D.C. No. 9:21

- cr

- 00038

- DLC

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 14, 2023 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Sadie Marie Todd appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

her guilty

- plea conviction and 48

- month sentence for possession with intent to

distribute controlled substances , in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)

. Pursuant to

Ande rs v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Todd ’s counsel has filed a brief stating

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 21 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 30064

that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Todd the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Todd waived her right to appeal her conviction and sentence. Our

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss

the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1724 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1724

 To provide that the reinsurance fee for the transitional reinsurance 
program under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act be applied 
    equally to all health insurance issuers and group health plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2013

   Mr. Thune (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. 
 Vitter, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Scott, 
Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Roberts) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that the reinsurance fee for the transitional reinsurance 
program under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act be applied 
    equally to all health insurance issuers and group health plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Union Tax Fairness Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF REINSURANCE FEE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the payments required 
to be made by health insurance issuers and third party administrators 
(on behalf of group health plans) under section 1341(b)(1)(A) of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18061(b)(1)(A)) 
shall be applied equally to all such issuers and administrators and may 
not be waived on behalf of any such issuer, administrator or group 
health plan.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 411,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        395,285
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   411,337
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,106
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,354
<INCOME-TAX>                                       555
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                799
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LSP-COTTAGE GROVE, L.P. AS OF
AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         103,638
<SECURITIES>                                29,055,681
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,638
<PP&E>                                     145,071,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             180,879,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,711,073
<BONDS>                                    155,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,168,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               180,879,073
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Clarence BETHEL v. STATE.

No. 38682.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

224 Certiorari denied without opinion. So.2d 810.
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Second Quarter 2001 and 2000



                                    Rental vacancy rates


                          Second       Second      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           2001         2000       2001 rate   difference


United States..........         8.3          8.0          0.2          0.3

  Inside MAs...........         7.9          7.6          0.2          0.3
    In central cities..         8.4          8.2          0.3          0.4
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         7.4          7.0          0.3          0.4
  Outside MAs..........        10.5         10.1          0.5          0.8

 Northeast.............         5.3          5.8          0.4          0.5
 Midwest...............        10.3          8.3          0.5          0.7
 South.................        10.8         10.5          0.4          0.5
 West..................         5.7          6.0          0.3          0.5



                                    Homeowner vacancy rates


                          Second       Second      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           2001         2000       2001 rate   difference


United States..........         1.8          1.5          0.1          0.1

  Inside MAs...........         1.6          1.3          0.1          0.1
    In central cities..         2.2          1.7          0.1          0.2
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         1.3          1.2          0.1          0.1
  Outside MAs..........         2.5          1.9          0.2          0.2

 Northeast.............         1.2          1.2          0.1          0.2
 Midwest...............         1.9          1.3          0.1          0.2
 South.................         2.0          1.8          0.1          0.1
 West..................         1.6          1.4          0.1          0.2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 2, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 27, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 85 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                           ( print page 37831)    *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-196, CP2018-274.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-16525 Filed 8-1-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 8, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16878]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0152; FRL-9981-05--Region 3]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Delaware; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2012 Fine 
Particulate Matter Standard; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the amendatory language of 
a final rule pertaining to EPA's approval of a state implementation 
plan (SIP) revision submitted by Delaware to address the infrastructure 
requirements for interstate transport of pollution with respect to the 
2012 fine particulate (PM<INF>2.5</INF>) national ambient air quality 
standards (NAAQS).

DATES: Effective August 13, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Schulingkamp, (215) 814-2021 or 
by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d4e5e55485154535a565c504d1357524e584d557d584d5c135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9deefef5e8f1f4f3faf6fcf0edb3f7f2eef8edf5ddf8edfcb3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 12, 2018 (83 FR 32209), EPA 
published a final rulemaking action approving Delaware's December 14, 
2015 SIP revision addressing the interstate transport requirements for 
the 2012 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS. In the published document appearing on 
page 32211, EPA inadvertently directed amendments to be published to 40 
CFR 52.470. The correct section for the state of Delaware is 40 CFR 
52.420.
    EPA does not expect adverse comments on this action.
    In FR Doc. 2018-14838 appearing on page 32209 in the Federal 
Register of Thursday, July 12, 2018, the following correction is made:


Sec.  52.420  [Corrected]

0
On page 32211, third column, under the heading ``Subpart I--Delaware'', 
the section heading ``Sec.  52.470 Identification of plan.'' is 
corrected to read ``Sec.  52.420 Identification of plan.''.

    Dated: July 26, 2018.
Cecil Rodrigues,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2018-16878 Filed 8-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Willie Ray SANDIFER v. Mrs. Elayn HUNT, Director, Department of Corrections, State of Louisiana.

No. 53454.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1973.

In re: Willie Ray Sandifer applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The plea was not withdrawn. Applicant asked the trial judge to correct an erroneous sentence, nothing else. Other issues may not be raised in this court for the first time.
SCAD-20-0000758

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner,

vs.

ROY M. YOSHINO (Bar No. 1419),

Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC NO. 19-0477)

ORDER TO TRANSFER TO INACTIVE STATUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon review of the December 15, 2020 petition filed by

the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) on behalf of, and with

the approval of, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of

the State of Hawai#i, requesting this court to immediately

transfer Respondent Roy M. Yoshino to inactive status, pursuant

to Rules 2.19 (b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State

of Hawai#i (RSCH), we conclude transfer to inactive status is

warranted. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Roy M. Yoshino is

immediately transferred to inactive status in this jurisdiction,

pursuant to RSCH Rules 2.19(b) and 2.19(c), effective with the

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCAD-20-0000758

18-DEC-2020

08:42 AM

Dkt. 4 ORD
filing of this order. Respondent Yoshino shall remain on

inactive status until further order of this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ODC shall suspend and hold

in abeyance proceedings against Respondent Yoshino to the extent

required by RSCH Rule 2.19(h).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Disciplinary Board

shall, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.19(d), cause a notice of this

transfer to inactive status to be published in a newspaper of

general circulation in the judicial circuit in which Respondent

Yoshino maintained his practice. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the clerk of the court,

pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.19(e), shall transmit a certified copy of

this order to all judges of the State of Hawai#i and shall

request their assistance and such action as may be indicated,

pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.20, to protect the interests of both

Respondent Yoshino and his clients, if any.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 18, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
889 A.2d 1026

#### Pierre A. WILSON and Tyrell Gray v. STATE of Maryland.

No. 117,

Sept. Term, 2005.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Jan. 11, 2006.

*516Celia Anderson Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen.), for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 11th day of January, 2006,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for reconsideration in light of *Stanley v. State,*390 Md. 175, 887 A.2d 1078 (2005). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Management’s Report on InternalControl Over Financial Reporting**

 

Barrick’s management isresponsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

Barrick’smanagement assessed the effectiveness of the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting as at December 31, 2008. Barrick’s Management used theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)framework to evaluate the effectiveness of Barrick’s internal control over financialreporting. Based on Barrick management’s assessment, Barrick’s internal controlover financial reporting is effective as at December 31, 2008.

 

Theeffectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31,2008 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, asstated in their report which is located on pages 80—81 of Barrick’s 2008Annual Financial Statements.

 

79

----
solarmax_ex1029.htm

EXHIBIT 10.29
 
 Letter Agreement
  
 August 30, 2022
  
 Yue Lian Liang
 #9-00, Hai Ding West Xia
 Hai Ding District
 Beijing City, China
  
 VIA EMAIL: YLLIANG5589@GMAIL.COM
  
 Dear Yue Lian Liang:
  
 This letter will confirm our agreement to extend the maturity date of the Amended and Restated Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated May 4, 2020 in the principal amount of $2,000,000 from August 31, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Interest will be payable on the unpaid principal balance at the rate of 6.00 percent (6.00%) per annum, payable quarterly on the last business day of June, September, December and March. The Company will pay the principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest, on December 31, 2023.
  
 AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED
 This 30th day of August, 2022
  
 	 YUE LIAN LIANG 
	  
	 SOLARMAX TECHNOLOGY, INC.
	  

	  
	  
	 3080 12th Street
	  

	 Beijing City, China 
	  
	 Riverside, CA 92507
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  

	 By: 
	 /s/ Yue Lian Liang
	  
	 By: 
	 /s/ Stephen P. Brown
	  

	  
	 Yue Lian Liang 
	  
	  
	 Stephen P. Brown
	  

	  
	  
	  
	 Title: 
	 Chief Financial Officer