alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**
**FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0890** Docket Number
**2011 -**  **SW -**  **019 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket MD Helicopter s Service Bulletin No. SB369D - 207, SB369E - 102, and SB369F 087, dated July 20, 2010.


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1648 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1648

  To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide 
        observance of two minutes of silence each Memorial Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 2013

    Mr. Kirk (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Manchin, and Mr. Durbin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide 
        observance of two minutes of silence each Memorial Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Memorial Day Moment of Silence 
Act''.

SEC. 2. OBSERVANCE OF MEMORIAL DAY.

    (a) Two Minutes of Silence.--Chapter 1 of title 36, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 145. Memorial Day
    ``The President shall issue each year a proclamation calling on the 
people of the United States to observe two minutes of silence on 
Memorial Day in honor of the service and sacrifice of members of the 
Armed Forces throughout the history of the United States, beginning 
at--
            ``(1) 3:00 p.m. Atlantic standard time;
            ``(2) 3:00 p.m. eastern daylight time;
            ``(3) 2:00 p.m. central daylight time;
            ``(4) 1:00 p.m. mountain daylight time;
            ``(5) 12:00 p.m. mountain standard time for states that do 
        not observe daylight saving time;
            ``(6) 12:00 p.m. Pacific daylight time;
            ``(7) 11:00 a.m. Alaska daylight time;
            ``(8) 10:00 a.m. Hawaii-Aleutian daylight time; and
            ``(9) 9:00 a.m. Hawaii-Aleutian standard time for areas 
        that do not observe daylight saving time.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 1 of 
title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``145. Memorial Day.''.
                                 <all>
```
Page No mene 16, and'17-are not to be asked in respect to infants. Inquiries numbered ‘11, 12, 16, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are to be answered (if at all) -
' merely by an affirmative mark, as /.

Scuzputz 1.—Inhabitants in 2 3° le Ltr. talet Ste. / Tin _, in the County of Meet Zi 7) fo _, State

of Aer Yahoo eY7, ted by me on the _/4% day of et , 1878
ost batting ce: os ZZL, Lote Michael a, Goss Marshal.

-— -——— ~ — + ~ 2 ]

| VaLvuz ov Reat Estate | Epvca- CONSTITUTIONAL
OWNED. P ARENTAGE. | TION. RELATIONS.
=. eee

LL

& re Families, numbered In the order
of visitation.

rE
|

—
-_——

Male Citizens of U, S. of

Attended school] within the year.

Whether deaf

and dumb,
blind, insane, |
or idiotic.

rime.

| Plact of Birth, naming State
jor Territory of U. S.; or the
| Country, it of foreign birth. |

The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day of
Jane, 1870, was in this family.

Profession, Occupation,
or Trade of each person,
male or female. |

—
—

Male Citizens of U. 8. of 21

ve mouths!
< Fe)
4
Chi
we EE

—White (W.), Black|
(Bf.)

.), Mulatto (M.

L OB, +g:

~—

year,

iu fractions,
—_—“

the order of visitation.

whore right to vote is
denied or abridged on

month (Jau., Feb., &o.)
otber grounds than re-

month (Jan., Feb., &o,)

 ‘Pewmales (F.)

wards.
bejlion ur utber c

Dwelling-honses. nnmbered itn

Age at last birth-day. If
under] gi

If born within the year, state
If married within the year, state
21 years of age and up-
yenra of age and upwarda,

Sex,—Males (M.),

nese (C.), Indian (1.)
Value of Real Estate.
Value of Personal Estate.
Father of foreign birth
Motker of foreign birth.

g
=
E
S
5
8
sc)

|
sie)

Cannot read.

Color.
(B.)

~o-
|

|
|

7

\

y,
ALO Mand fee | _

ao ww

Cc mn oc KH fk

eo
—]

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Lad Goede. EG Visit http:/www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
Gag 7 . , available records like the one shown here.

et

FRE aie a ie Re ne ee
‘as « en Ae

—s = ee

. Crore SSF shew te ibroiotent se
rf pam na ee — ies es aes

<. _ Stas ee

f e 6

owe

| Ne . of dwellings, _ GO No. of white temales, — No. of males, foreign born,

' families, . 6 “ “ colored males,  —s_. “ | females, *

“ white males, ad ay 4g “« females, “«  dlind,

rae *
# C_2011308EN.01000501.xml

| 20.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 October 2011

2011/C 308/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3828 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4455 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87495 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1245 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2428 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7350 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,873 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7055 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3351 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3389 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5637 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3402 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3981 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7532 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7306 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7436 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 566,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0459 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8203 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4650 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 167,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2957 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,678 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,8700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,438 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4280 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4878 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,9850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3828

JPY

Japanese yen

106,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4455

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87495

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1245

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2428

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7350

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,873

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7055

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3351

RON

Romanian leu

4,3389

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5637

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3402

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3981

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7532

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7306

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7436

KRW

South Korean won

1 566,48

ZAR

South African rand

11,0459

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8203

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4650

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 167,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2957

PHP

Philippine peso

59,678

RUB

Russian rouble

42,8700

THB

Thai baht

42,438

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4280

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4878

INR

Indian rupee

67,9850

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

[PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP LETTERHEAD]



August 14, 2001


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated August 14, 2001 on our review of interim
financial information of The Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(the "Company") as of and for the period ended June 30, 2001 and included in the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in its Registration Statement dated March 27, 1997,
October 28, 1997, April 9, 1998 and June 4, 1998.


Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
<Page>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1.1

   Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Eugene R. McGrath, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison,
Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002, which this statement accompanies, (the
"Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                   /s/ Eugene R. McGrath
                                                   ---------------------
                                                   Eugene R. McGrath


Dated: February 27, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF:

M.J.G.,

a Child.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00037-CV

Appeal from the

65th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2022DCM0309)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes that there was no error 

in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It has been determined that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal; therefore, this 

Court makes no other order with respect to the payment of costs on appeal. This decision shall 

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
#### PRUDENCE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Melvin A. DORAY, Appellee.

No. 66-487.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District

March 7, 1967.

Hawkesworth & Kay, Miami, for appellant.

Henry W. Krystow, Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal the defendant in the trial court attacks a final judgment in a non-jury trial. The single point presented urges a failure to prove negligence. The judgment is affirmed upon the rule stated in Dehon v. Heidt, Fla. 1948, 38 So.2d 39, and Chaney v. Headley, Fla. 1956, 90 So.2d 297.

Affirmed.
#### Kenneth OWENS, Appellant, v. KEN’S PAINT AND BODY SHOP, Appellee.

No. 66-275.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District

Feb. 28, 1967.

*18Engel & Pollack and Jack Taffer, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The plaintiff appeals an order dismissing his cause in the trial court for failure to prosecute. See Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.420(e), 30 F.S.A. and 45.19(1) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The order was entered by the court upon its own motion.

First we note that the appellant did not make a motion to reinstate provided by the rule. Under some conditions of the record this failure has been held to be a fatal defect. See National Surety Corp. v. Grahn, Fla. 1952, 57 So.2d 457; Carn v. Quarles, Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 536; Reilly v. Fuss, Fla.App.1964, 170 So.2d 475.

In Zukor v. Hill, Fla.1956, 84 So.2d 554, the Supreme Court held that the dismissal of an action under statute dealing with abatement of action pending one year without prosecution, becomes absolute after the passage of one month. We therefore conclude that the instant order is final and appealable. See art. 5, sec. 5(3) Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

 It should be noted that a ruling on a motion for order of dismissal for failure to prosecute is subj ect to attack only on the ground that it constitutes an abuse of discretion, and this heavy burden must be borne by the losing party. Adams Engineering Co. v. Construction Products Corp., Fla.1963, 156 So.2d 497. The same test is to be applied in an appeal from an order on a motion to reinstate an action dismissed for want of prosecution. Young v. Pyle, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 659 [opinion filed January 12, 1967], See Adams Engineering Co. v. Construction Products Corp., supra.

*19It affirmatively appears that the trial judge misconceived the state of the record at the time of the entry of his order. Within the one year prior to the order, the plaintiff had made apparent efforts to prosecute his cause by the filing of a notice to take the deposition of the defendant, and by a motion to strike defendant’s pleadings for failure of defendant to make discovery. Upon the condition of this record, which reveals that the defendant has removed himself from the jurisdiction, and counsel of record for the defendant have asked leave of court to withdraw, the plaintiff cannot he said to have failed in his duty to take some active measure intended and calculated to hasten the suit to judgment. Gulf Appliance Distributors, Inc. v. Long, Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 706, Reilly v. Fuss, Fla. App.1964, 170 So.2d 475.

We therefore conclude that the instant ruling constituted an abuse of discretion.

Reversed and remanded.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8418

DYLAN LOPEZ TYREE, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

WARDEN C. HOLLAR, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior 

District Judge. (7:08-cv-00374-JLK-MFU) 

Submitted: September 9, 2009 Decided: September 18, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Dylan Lopez Tyree, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Dylan Lopez Tyree seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition 

and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Tyree has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We deny Tyree’s motion to appoint counsel and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Tommy Ross FERGUSON, Appellee.

No. 66-938.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 28, 1967.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Joseph Durant, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Eugene Spellman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Shelby v. State, 1944, 155 Fla. 182, 21 So.2d 787.
----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**SECTION        906 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)    | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September                  30, 2006                  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | the                  information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                  of The                  Amacore Group, Inc..                |

|   | /s/                  Clark A.                  Marcus         Clark                  A. MarcusChief                  Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### John S. HAGER, Jr., and Francis Hager, his wife, Appellants, v. Fred WALDRON and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a corporation, Appellees.

No. 71-1100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 1973,

Timothy P. Poulton of Deschler, Reed, Mowry & Poulton, Boca Raton, for appellants.

Steven R. Berger of Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, P. A., Miami, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants-plaintiffs, John S. Hager and Francis Hager, appeal a summary final judgment entered in favor of appellees-defendants, Fred Waldron and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, in an action for damages arising out of an automobile-horse collision. We have reviewed the record in the light of the points raised on appeal, and reverse.

We do so because we find that a genuine issue as to a material fact exists as to whether the appellee-defendant, Fred Wal-dron, agreed to board the horse, and as to whether the appellee-defendant, Fred Waldron, was negligent in maintaining and operating the pasture. Such circumstance bars use of the summary judgment procedure. Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40; Hartnett v. Fowler, Fla.1957, 94 So.2d 724; Enes v. Baker, Fla.1952, 58 So.2d 551.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents, without opinion.
steam

_ record - Re: Ke y stone ICR Extension Request (2)

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.
Sincerely,

-----"Lafontaine, James K" <jlafontaine@rrienergy.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Lafontaine, James K" <jlafontaine@rrienergy.com> Date: 06/24/2010 11:59AM cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Jacklin, Mark J" <mjacklin@rrienergy.com>, "Berkebile, Rodney J" <rberkeb ile@rrienergy.com> Subject: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2) From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: "Lafontaine, James K" <jlafontaine@rrienergy.com> Date: 6/28/2010 3:24 PM Sub j ect: Re: Keystone ICR Extension Request (2) Pa g e 1 of 2

3/1/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C28BE90DO

...Dear Ms. Alicea:

Please see the attached Keys tone ICR Extension Request.

Thank you,

James Lafontaine

General Manager

Keystone Gene rating Station

724-354-5450

[ attachment "Keystone ICR Extension Request (2).doc" removed by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] Pa g e 2 of 2

3/1/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C28BE90DO

...
#### James Olin YEARGIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-67.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Fornaro, President and Chief Executive Officer and Arne G. Haak, Vice President of Finance, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |     |  |                                                                     
|-------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|April 23, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert L. Fornaro                                               
|               |  |     |  | Robert L. Fornaro                                                   
|               |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                               
|               |  |    
|               |  | By: |  | /s/ Arne G. Haak                                                    
|               |  |     |  | Vice President of Finance, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3904

_____________________________

DERRICK FREDERICK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell Healey, Judge.

November 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Derrick Frederick, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven E. Woods, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### James Lewis HILL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-953.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

Habeas corpus denied.
261 La. 526

#### Corbett E. NINI, Jr. v. SANFORD BROTHERS, INC. and Surplus Underwriters, Inc.

No. 52363.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 1972.

In re: Sanford Brothers, Inc. and Surplus Underwriters, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Mary.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Full Report on Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories and Orders

August 2013

Due to the lapse in funding, August figures for all manufacturing industries were not released on October 

3, 2013.