alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# congreSr 

# ot toe 

# 'nU teDb tatet * *astington, €20515 #tr7 -FC, October 30, 2000 Dear Colleague: . , .. E-fv/S/<-cg 2- 

## Want a Halloween fright that will stay with you, your family, and everyone in America for their entire lives? 

# Which washer in Sunday's ad : jI 

# :can we still buy under a

-F^ 

# {DoE proposed mandate? HOTPOIMPTbya / 

## >

o *wst LJmit 1 pair._ - Largecapacity aer 2 wash cycles. #6012004 Mfr. #VULLR120A or Large capacity automatic electric dryer Autormaic dy control.#7011006 Mr.#NLLR113EWO 

## ;X ^ 2 

## - r'^
- - _- 0 

## : - 0--:-i
- :10 %cashback i'"' ' '' -tX-t ; < _-,r-o . ....

.. * "'-"* 

### '~Whi~~~RlDo~l 

## ~only $10a month: -..-......... ~ ............ Super capacity washer 8wash cycles, 2 speed combinations. #6813719 --.--- ~ =---__~ ~/ - -- -- -Mfr. #LSR8233JO 

# .^^ ====

# =^ :^ ; 

# * ^i

# ~~^"*, 29999 only $10amonth. 5-cycle electric dryer 5.9 cu.ft. drum, 4temps. #7809711 Mfr. #LER5644JO La'rgest Capacity
. G tra. Similartomodel 

### You Can Buy: i

- 

### 3.3 Cu.Ft.


## . 

# .CAPA=TL.US0 ; 

# PU I0 

# : 

# -0---- -

I0% 

### cash back :- 120 loads of with this pair 

# 3. 

# .. 

# 2 you pay.. - only2 $1

omonth 

# 329 2 99 Heavy-duty 

### 3-speed Giant 

### capacty heavy 

### ty ony 10month only $10 amonth combination washer Auger ele dryer ruiht, ctric dryer D light 2 speed combinations 6;0 cu.ft. capacity 

### agitator for better rollover. automatic or time-controlled cycles. for delicates 6506712 dryer drum. #7506715 #6764714 Mfr.#LNC 6764A71 #7784717 Mfr.#LNC7764 Gas extra. Mf #WJSR1070AWW Mfr.#DBXR43EAWW Gas ext# Mfr. #WJSR1070AWW Mfr.#DBXR453EAWW Gas ext a. 

# plus...$2-SlOO 

# m

# anufacturer
'"'^"^--b~t-^ :r ' -' ' 

## ~t ' , . .ea e -soe---- j 

### -- ~~ 120 ... , s o f
->. -I'I 

## iEFRIGIDAIRE i 120 Ic 

## of,, yourchoice 

## j 10% cash bac 10% cash bat 

### k 

# -27T 

# ,-- , $399 

# 36h-9 on.$10 a month after $30 mal-in rebat, only $10 a month Super capacity o -Electridryer you pay$429. Electric dryer! 17512718 washer s69s807 #770808 Washer #6512715 Mfr. #DPSR465AWW Mfr. #FWS96g9HW M. #DE7970EW Gas extra. Mfr.#WMSE4190AWW Gasextra.

; ,, -e

.. -- --.. . .. ..- . I 

# I

. , ' -. D-. , InE by- 

### your choice l 

### -r i

### ^ : 

### .:: f ; . .. 

### G t ^ B tf l O ' ' ' - ^ ^ '*'* *** "' ^ -: .' I I!
regular or delicate fabrics. 

### 3temperature settings washer #6340712 settings #7340715 washer #6371714 #73717174A #6201714 Mfr. #RAX7244JQ #7201717 Mf. #REX4634J Gas extra. .Mfr.MAV6200WW: Mfr#M 200 s a Mfr. MAH4 AWW 18 'See pages 18-19 for payment creditdetails. All FREE and RE TE offe with purchase of Items shown; coupons details In tore. Appliancesshown may notbe displayed Inall stores, but are available on customer order. 

## ANSWER ON REVERSE *

# WEmAsV8TDW-A';73 - 

# -FF-C

On. y the $988.99 (before tax) model 

## Only the $988.99 (before tax) model
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-85580 of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dominion Resources, Inc.) on Form S-3 of our reports dated January 21, 2003 (which reports expressed an unqualified opinion and included an explanatory paragraph as tochanges in accounting principle for: goodwill and other intangible assets in 2002, derivative instruments and hedging activities in 2001, and the method of accounting used to develop the market-related value of pension plan assets in 2000),appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Consolidated Natural Gas Company for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Richmond, Virginia 

March 20, 2003
#### Jackson *v.*The Cleveland Ry. Co.

*Negligence*— Directed *verdict erroneous*— Evidence *to sustain allegations of petition.*

(No. 18387

Decided December 23, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Smith, Olds S Smith*and *Messrs. Payer, Winch, Mmshall é Karch,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Squire, Sanders S Dempsey,*for defendant in error.

By the Court.

This ease was tried upon the fourth amended petition, which averred, among other grounds of negligence, the following:

> “That at the time herein complained of defendant, the Cleveland Bailway Company * * *

negligently, as plaintiff was in the act of alighting from said ear and at or about the instant said collision occurred, closed or started to close the door of said exit, so that the same was forced against her in a violent and sudden manner, thereby causing or contributing to cause her to be thrown against said farebox railing; and negligently failed and neglected seasonably to warn or apprise plaintiff that said collision was imminent and that said door was about to be closed in the manner herein described.”

The record of the testimony of plaintiff and several of her witnesses discloses evidence tending to prove that she received her injuries, or at least a part of them, by the closing of the doors of the *632car against her, and that the doors were closed against her by the agent of the defendant company prior to the instant of the collision of the automobile with the ear of the defendant company.

The plaintiff’s evidence upon this issue, under the authority of the case of *C., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.*v. *Lee, ante,*391, 145 N. E., 843, the case of *Pope, Admx.,*v. *Mudge,*108 Ohio St., 192, 140 N. E., 501, the case of *McMurtrie*v. *Wheeling Traction Co.,*107 Ohio St., 107, 140 N. E., 636, and *Vignola*v. *New York Cent. Rd. Co.,*102 Ohio St., 194, 131 N. E., 357, was sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and it was error for the court to sustain the motion of the defendant for a directed verdict.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals and court of common pleas is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Conn, JJ., concur.
# C_2011279EN.01002801.xml

| 23.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/28

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6349 — Motherson/Cross Industries/Peguform/Wethje)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 279/04

On 16 September 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6349. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6349. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Marguarite E. DAMPIER, Appellant, v. H. Payge DAMPIER, Appellee.

No. 72-474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 30, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-11271

Summary Calendar

 

ANAND P. AGARWAL; URMILA AGARWAL,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

RHONALD MORRIS; BETTY MORRIS, Substitute Trustee; JOHN

BAYLESS; SHIRLEY SMITH,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(94-CV-2623-P)

- - - - - - - - - -

February 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Plaintiffs-Appellants Anand and Urmila Agarwal appeal the

district court’s denial of their motions for remand of their

complaint to state court and the court’s grant of DefendantAppellees’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing the Agarwals’

claims.

They argue first that the court erred by dismissing their

claims of (1) breach of contract; (2) promissory estoppel; (3)

wrongful acceleration and foreclosure; (4) unjust enrichment; 
2

(5) conspiracy; (6) interference with contractual relations, and

myriad other claims. As a preliminary issue, we conclude that

despite the Agarwals’ imprecise notice of appeal, we have

jurisdiction to review their claims that remand was warranted. See

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Deshotel, 142 F.3d 873, 884 (5th Cir.

1998). Regarding the remand issue, however, we find no abuse of

discretion. McClelland v. Gronwaldt, 155 F.3d 507, 519 (5th Cir.

1998).

 With regard to the merits of the Agarwals’ complaint, we have

reviewed de novo the record and the briefs of the parties and

conclude that the district court correctly granted summary

judgment. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons given by that

court. See Agarwal v. Morris, No. 3:94-CV-2623-P (N.D. Tex.; Jul

8, 1996, and Oct. 1, 1997). 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
     FROM  THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1999  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COATES INTERNATIONAL,
     LTD. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000948426
<NAME>                        Coates International, Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                         193,132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,186
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,318
<PP&E>                                       1,955,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                 396,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,874,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,401,341
<BONDS>                                        898,504
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,572
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (427,545)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,874,675
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   869
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               475,885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (573,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (573,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (573,899)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.09)





</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17

- 2030 V

Filed: March 4, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

MARISSA BIALEK

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , for

petitioner.

Alexis B. Babcock

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On December 26, 2017 , petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of an influenza vaccination received on October 15,

2016 . Petition at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 1, 2019

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in whic h he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent states that the Division of Injury Compensation Programs

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Pr omotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon re view, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

eas e of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).( “ DICP ” ) “ has determined that petitioner ’ s left shoulder injury is consistent wi t h an on

Table SIRVA related to the flu vaccine she received on October 15, 2016. ” Id. at 4

. Respondent further agrees that DICP did not identify other causes for petitioner ’ s SIRVA, petitioner suffered the s equela of her injury for more than six months, and petitioner meets the statutory requirements for entitlement to compensation

. Id at 4

- 5

. In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1778 

To require the Attorney General to report on State law penalties for certain 

child abusers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Attorney General to report on State law 

penalties for certain child abusers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kilah Davenport Child 

5 Protection Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL REPORT. 

7 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘State’’ 

8 means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, 

9 and each territory of the United States. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1778 IS

1 (b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 

2 after the date of enactment of this Act, and again 3 years 

3 thereafter, the Attorney General shall publish and submit 

4 to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the 

5 Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representa6 tives a report on the penalties for violations of laws prohib7 iting child abuse in each State, including whether the laws 

8 of each State provide for enhanced penalties when a victim 

9 of child abuse suffers serious bodily injury, or permanent 

10 or protracted loss or impairment of any mental or emo11 tional function. 

12 SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF PREDICATE FOR INCREASED PEN13 ALTIES FOR CERTAIN DOMESTIC ASSAULTS. 

14 Section 117(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

15 amended by inserting ‘‘, or against a child of, or in the 

16 care of, the person committing the offense’’ after ‘‘inti17 mate partner’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 11


                    TEL-SAVE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       For the Three Months               For the Six Months
                                                          Ended June 30,                    Ended June 30,
                                                   ----------------------------      ----------------------------
                                                       1997            1996              1997             1996
                                                   -----------     ------------      -----------       ----------
<S>                                                <C>               <C>               <C>              <C>    
Net income (loss)                                  $  (5,865)        $ 4,058           $(435)           $ 7,435
                                                   ===========     ============      ===========       ==========

PRIMARY

Weighted  average  common  and
  common   equivalent   shares
  outstanding - Primary:

     Weighted average shares                          63,898           53,374           63,171           46,186
     Weighted average equivalent shares                2,983            5,392            3,196            3,864
                                                   -----------     ------------      -----------       ----------
     Weighted average common and common
     equivalent shares - Primary                      66,881           58,766           66,367           50,050
                                                   -----------     ------------      -----------       ----------
Net income (loss) per share - Primary               $   (.09)       $     .07             (.01)             .14
                                                   ===========     ============      ===========       ==========

FULLY DILUTED

Weighted  average  common  and
  common   equivalent   shares
  outstanding - Fully Diluted:

     Weighted average shares                         63,898            53,374           63,171           46,186
     Weighted average equivalent shares               3,000             6,490            3,308            6,848
                                                   -----------     ------------      -----------       ----------
     Weighted average common and common
     equivalent shares - Fully Diluted               66,898            59,864           66,479           53,034
                                                   -----------     ------------      -----------       ----------
Net income (loss) per share - Fully Diluted        $   (.09)         $    .07        $    (.01)        $    .14
                                                   ===========     ============      ===========       ==========
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 13, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis*                     (David L. Hubbard, Senior Manager) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Comments.applications@stls.frb.org*:                

                    1.                     *First State Bancorp, Inc., Caruthersville, Missouri*; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Mississippi County Savings and Loan Association, Charleston, Missouri, and thereby engage in operating a savings association pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(ii).                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 24, 2018.

Yao-Chin Chao,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-16062 Filed 7-26-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P