alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             989
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,484
<INVENTORY>                                     64,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,546
<PP&E>                                          90,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,647
<BONDS>                                         43,273
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,703
<SALES>                                         65,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,603
<CGS>                                           50,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   342
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,443
<INCOME-TAX>                                       997
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,446
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,446
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011349EN.01000101.xml

| 30.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6388 — Ecolab/Nalco Holding Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 349/01

On 8 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6388. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6388. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph B. Leonard, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Stanley J. Gadek, Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                                                       
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  | 
|August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/ JOSEPH B. LEONARD
|               |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Joseph B. Leonard Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer                                
|               |  |  |  |    
|               |  |  |  |     |  | By:                   |  | /s/ STANLEY J. GADEK                                                                  
|               |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Stanley J. Gadek Senior Vice
President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Jesus Alberto SIRA, Stanley Warren, and Caribbean Concessions, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. Samuel B. ASCH and Marsha D. Asch, Appellees.

No. 71-267.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 25, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1603 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1603

To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust for the benefit 
 of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatami Indians, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2013

Ms. Stabenow (for herself and Mr. Levin) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust for the benefit 
 of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatami Indians, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF INDIAN TRUST LAND.

    (a) In General.--The land taken into trust by the United States for 
the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians 
and described in the final Notice of Determination of the Department of 
the Interior (70 Fed. Reg. 25596 (May 13, 2005)) is reaffirmed as trust 
land, and the actions of the Secretary of the Interior in taking that 
land into trust are ratified and confirmed.
    (b) No Claims.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an 
action (including an action pending in a Federal court as of the date 
of enactment of this Act) relating to the land described in subsection 
(a) shall not be filed or maintained in a Federal court and shall be 
promptly dismissed.
    (c) Retention of Future Rights.--Nothing in this Act alters or 
diminishes the right of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of 
Pottawatomi Indians from seeking to have any additional land taken into 
trust by the United States for the benefit of the Band.
                                 <all>
```
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________ No. 95-10515 Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. RONALD W. HUGHES, SR.

Defendant - Appellant

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:94 CR 075 X 2)

_________________________________________________________________ July 3, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Construing the application of defendant-appellant Ronald W. Hughes for release pending sentencing as an appeal of the district court's order denying release, 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c); Fed.R.App.P. 9(a); Fifth Circuit Policy 14(f), the district court's order is
AFFIRMED. A district court's finding that a defendant poses a riskof flight is a factual finding that is reviewed for clear error.

See United States v. Cantu-Salinas , 789 F.2d 1145, 1145 & n.1 (5th Cir. 1986) (order denying release pending trial). A factual
fin ding is not clearly erroneous as long as it is plausible in light of the record of the case as a whole. U nited State s v. Maseratti, 1 F.3d 330, 340 (5th Cir. 1993), c ert. denied , 114 S.
Ct. 1096, and cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 1552, and cert. denied , 115
S. Ct. 282 (1994). We are not persuaded, based on the material that Hughes has submitted with his application, that the district
court's finding that Hugh es poses a flight risk is clearly

erroneous.
AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner. v. Noah J. CARTER, Respondent.

No. 41825.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 18, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 254 So.2d 230.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00093-CV

In the INTEREST OF A.C.L. and L.A.L., Children

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PA-01262

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Judge Presiding1

Opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 18, 2012

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED 

J.E.L.2 appeals a final order in a suit affecting the parent child relationship filed by the 

Department of Family and Protective Services. We affirm the order. 

The Department removed the children A.C.L. and L.A.L. from their mother J.E.L.’s 

home and sought to terminate the parental rights of both parents. By the time of trial, however, 

the Department recommended the best interests of the children would be served by appointing 

the children’s father their permanent managing conservator and making J.E.L. a possessory 

 1 This case was assigned to the 131st Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas, in which the Honorable John 

D. Gabriel is the presiding judge. However, the case was tried by and the final order was signed by the Honorable 

Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge, appointed pursuant to section 201.201 of the Texas Family Code. See

TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 201.201, et seq. (West 2008 & West Supp. 2011). 2 To protect the identity of the minor child, we refer to the appellant and the children by their initials. See TEX. FAM.

CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (West 2011); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8.
04-12-00093-CV

- 2 -

conservator. Following a bench trial, the court dismissed the Department as conservator, 

appointed the father permanent managing conservator of the children, and appointed J.E.L. a 

possessory conservator. J.E.L. filed a timely notice of appeal.

J.E.L.’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief 

containing a professional evaluation of the record and concluding there are no arguable grounds 

to be advanced and the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, *4 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure to appeals in cases 

in which termination of parental rights is sought), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). Appellant was provided a copy of the 

brief and informed of her right to review the record and file her own brief. See Nichols v. State, 

954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio, July 23, 1997, no pet.); In re R.R., 2003 WL 

21157944, at *4. Appellant did not file a pro se brief.

We have reviewed the record and the attorney’s Anders brief, and we agree with counsel 

that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the 

trial court’s order.

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
| Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 1. | This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Logan W. Kruger                       |   | /s/ Michael A. Bless                      |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
| By:  Logan W. Kruger            |   | By:  Michael A. Bless           |
| Title:  Chief Executive Officer |   | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:  August 10, 2009          |   | Date:  August 10, 2009          |
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0371. KATERINA WILLIAMS v. EUGENE WILLIAMS.

The trial court found Katerina Williams in contempt for failing to pay

temporary alimony and attorney fees in a pending divorce matter. Williams filed this

direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Under the Georgia Constitution of

1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6), the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over

“[a]ll divorce and alimony cases.” Accordingly, we hereby TRANSFER this case to

the Supreme Court of Georgia for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/08/2015

December 08, 2015
No. 11632.

#### Heidlebaugh, Probate Judge, *v.*Recker.

Decided November 9, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Putnam county.

*Mr E. R. Eastman; Messrs. Malone & Griffiths; Mr.*

*W. B. Wheeler*and *Mr. B. A. Unverferth,*prosecuting attorney, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Straman & Straman; Messrs. Watts & Moore*and *Messrs. Henry & Robert Newbegin,*for defendant in error.

The circuit court having erred in allowing a peremptory writ of mandamus, its judgment should not be affirmed. The contested election case having been effectively certified to the court of common pleas, a judgment of reversal would now be unavailing. The petition in error is therefore dismissed.

Spear, Davis, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


 <ARTICLE>             5
 <MULTIPLIER>          1
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     6-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           JUN-30-1997
 <PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1996
 <CASH>                                                          820,960
 <SECURITIES>                                                          0
 <RECEIVABLES>                                                   802,653
 <ALLOWANCES>                                                     92,971
 <INVENTORY>                                                     337,307
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              2,190,895
 <PP&E>                                                          194,006
 <DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                2,486,186
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,615,921
 <BONDS>                                                               0
 <COMMON>                                                      4,237,517
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
 <PREFERRED>                                                   1,900,198
 <OTHER-SE>                                                    1,034,738
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  2,486,186
 <SALES>                                                       2,129,483
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              2,129,483
 <CGS>                                                           682,496
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   682,496
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              2,475,051
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               28,480
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (1,056,544)
 <INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (1,056,544)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
 <CHANGES>                                                             0
 <NET-INCOME>                                                 (1,056,544)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      (.18)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (.18)
 
 
</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael MILLER.

No. 59769.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

Carey J. Ellis, Jr., Glynn D. Roberts, Ray-ville, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Don K. Carroll, Dist. Atty., William R. Coenen, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Karen M. Spaun
    --------------------------

Karen M. Spaun
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2006
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 245 (Thursday, December 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 75412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30662]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOD-2012-OS-0016]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 
22, 2013.
    Title and OMB Number: Joint Personnel Adjudication System; OMB 
Control Number 0704-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 22,225.
    Responses per Respondent: 95.
    Annual Responses: 2,111,375.
    Average Burden per Response: 20 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 703,792 hours.
    Needs and Uses: JPAS requires personal data collection to 
facilitate the initiation, investigation and adjudication of 
information relevant to DoD security clearances and employment 
suitability determinations for active duty military, civilian employees 
and contractors requiring such credentials. As a Personnel Security 
System it is the authoritative source for clearance information 
resulting in accesses determinations to sensitive/classified 
information and facilities.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 
VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: November 21, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-30662 Filed 12-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```