alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,614
<INVENTORY>                                     61,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,942
<PP&E>                                          89,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,519
<BONDS>                                         38,970
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,461
<SALES>                                         80,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,181
<CGS>                                           61,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,018
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                               ACCELGRAPHICS, INC.
    STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                  (amounts in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Three Months
                                                                    Ended March 31
                                                                    --------------

                                                                     1997      1996
                                                                     ----      ----

<S>                                                                  <C>       <C>  
Weighted average common shares outstanding for period                1,226     1,071

Dilutive employee stock options and warrants                           335        --
                                                                   -------   -------
                                                                     1,561     1,071

Common Equivalent Shares pursuant to Staff Accounting
  Bulletin No. 83 (1)                                                5,137     5,137
                                                                   -------   -------


Shares used in per share calculations                                6,698     6,208
                                                                   =======   =======

Net income (loss)                                                  $   834   $  (560)
                                                                   =======   =======


Pro forma net income (loss) per share                              $  0.12   $ (0.09)
                                                                   =======   =======
</TABLE>



(1)  - Includes all Preferred Stock on an as-if converted basis and stock
       options and warrants granted after February 7, 1996 (using the treasury
       stock method).
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF  TITLE 18,UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
California Independent Bancorp, a California corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:



|Dated: August 12, 2002 |  | /s/ John I. JelavichJohn I. Jelavich
President and Chief Executive Officer        
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2002 |  | /s/ Kevin R. WatsonKevin R. Watson
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION



I, Allen E. Larson, certify that:



1.
        I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;




2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:




a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.




c)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
        The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors:




a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.




Date:
        July 13, 2007
        
        /s/   Allen E. LarsonController and Chief Accounting Officer




---
#### Richard L. WOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-499.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 17, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,108,581                 503,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,477                 115,571
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,000)                 (6,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,210,268               3,173,792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,399,673               3,944,478
<PP&E>                                       2,404,810               2,325,993
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,994,822)             (1,938,188)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,819,464               4,339,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          207,132               1,488,357
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           77,500                  77,500
<PREFERRED>                                        597                     597
<COMMON>                                     3,724,773               2,803,473
<OTHER-SE>                                     809,462                (30,175)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,819,464               4,339,752
<SALES>                                        746,420               1,123,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               746,420               1,123,390
<CGS>                                          529,958                 917,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  940,717                  945,80
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,548,446               2,054,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,447                  82,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,765,190)             (1,959,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200                  10,084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,765,390)             (1,969,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0             (1,841,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,765,390)             (3,810,736)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.54)                  (2.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)                  (2.41)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-84156) of Consolidated Edison, Inc. relating to the Con EdisonAutomatic Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Payment Plan (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-04463-99) relating to the Con Edison 1996 Stock Option Plan; (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-118159) relating to TheConsolidated Edison Stock Purchase Plan; and (iv) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-108903) relating to The Consolidated Edison, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan and Senior Executive Restricted Stock Awards and (v) the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (No. 333-114222) relating to debt and equity securities of Con Edison of our report dated February 17, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

New York, NY

February 25, 2005
#### Bobby JACKSON, a/k/a Bobby Crane, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 27, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 22, 1974.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, Ronald B. Cosgrove, Stephen H. Donohoe and James 0. Brecher, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Addison v. Florida Parole Board, 281 So.2d 906 (1 Fla.App. 1973); and Russ v. State, Fla.App., 291 So.2d 73, Opinion filed August 14, 1973.

RAWLS, C. J., WIGGINTON, J., and CARROLL, CHARLES K., Associate Judge, concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129875 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129875 COA: 260649 Jackson CC: 00-006018-FH MARK ALAN BIBLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0424 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2006

Clerk
#### JACMAR BUILDERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, a Minnesota corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-640.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 30, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Anthony ESPERTI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43896.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 23, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 58.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements of operations and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
                              
<PERIOD-END>                                   jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         16,263
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    219,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               247,841
<PP&E>                                         1,602,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,869,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,515,518
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,963
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     640,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,869,207
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (421,907)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (421,907)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (421,907)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.07)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Federal Register Citation Notice of Previous Announcement:

83 FR 35476

# Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting:

 Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

# Changes in the Meeting:

This meeting will also discuss:

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * *

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2018-16325 Filed 7-26-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1779 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1779

 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire hydrants from the 
 prohibition on the use of lead pipes, fittings, fixtures, solder, and 
                                 flux.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2013

   Mr. Toomey (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Portman, and Mr. Casey) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire hydrants from the 
 prohibition on the use of lead pipes, fittings, fixtures, solder, and 
                                 flux.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Fire Safety Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FIRE HYDRANTS FROM PROHIBITION ON USE OF LEAD.

    Section 1417(a)(4)(B) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 
300g-6(a)(4)(B)) is amended by inserting ``fire hydrants,'' after 
``shower valves,''.

SEC. 3. EVALUATION OF SOURCES OF LEAD IN WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS AND 
              ALTERNATE ROUTING SYSTEMS.

    The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall--
            (1) consult with and seek the advice of the National 
        Drinking Water Advisory Council on potential changes to the 
        regulations pertaining to lead under the Safe Drinking Water 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.); and
            (2) request the National Drinking Water Advisory Council to 
        consider sources of lead throughout drinking water distribution 
        systems, including through components used to reroute drinking 
        water during distribution system repairs.
                                 <all>
```
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  Second Quarter 2004 and 2005









                                    Second     Second          90-Percent

Area                                quarter    quarter    Confidence Interval(&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>

                                     2004       2005     of 2005 rate  of difference



United States.....................      69.2       68.6        0.5         0.4



  Inside Core-Based

     Statistical Areas............       NA        67.1        1.3          NA

    In central cities.............       NA        54.3        1.0          NA

    Not in central citie

    (suburbs).....................       NA        75.8        1.3          NA

  Outside Core-Based

    Statistical Areas.............       NA        76.2        2.6          NA



 Northeast........................      65.4       64.7        0.9         0.8

 Midwest..........................      74.2       73.4        1.0         0.7

 South............................      70.9       70.4        0.9         0.6

 West.............................      64.5       63.8        1.2         0.8



    <sup>a</sup>A 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.

The larger the confidence interval is, in relation to the size of the estimate, the less 

reliable the estimate.

    NA  Not Available.  Core-Based Statistical Area data for 2005 and later are not 

comparable to earlier data.  Beginning in first quarter 2005, the Current Population 

Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey is using the new metropolitan and micropolitan definitions 

that were announced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in June 2003, and 

were based on the application of the 2000 standards to Census 2000 data.  OMB announced 

updates as of December 2003, based on application of the 2000 standards to more recent 

Census Bureau estimates.  The December 2003 definitions are available at  

http://www.census.gov./population/www/estimates/metrodef.html.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 136439 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 136439 COA: 282052 Kalkaska CC: 06-002747-FH CHARLES LEON SAILLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 19, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
#### Michael DUDDY, Appellant, v. INDIAN RIVER GAS COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 279.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 12, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Karen M. SpaunKaren M. SpaunSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2011