alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1692 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1692

  To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule 
relating to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger 
  operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air 
                   carriers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 2013

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself, Ms. Cantwell, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Markey) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule 
relating to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger 
  operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air 
                   carriers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Skies Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO FLIGHTCREW MEMBER DUTY 
              AND REST REQUIREMENTS FOR PASSENGER OPERATIONS TO APPLY 
              TO ALL-CARGO OPERATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall modify the 
final rule specified in subsection (b) so that the flightcrew member 
duty and rest requirements under that rule apply to flightcrew members 
in all-cargo operations conducted by air carriers in the same manner as 
those requirements apply to flightcrew members in passenger operations 
conducted by air carriers.
    (b) Final Rule Specified.--The final rule specified in this 
subsection is the final rule of the Federal Aviation Administration--
            (1) published in the Federal Register on January 4, 2012 
        (77 Fed. Reg. 330); and
            (2) relating to flightcrew member duty and rest 
        requirements.
    (c) Applicability of Rulemaking Requirements.--The requirements of 
section 553 of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to the 
modification required by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Order filed, February 05, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00022-CV

____________

CLAUDIA HARPER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT COEXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JAMES WESLEY CLERK, JR., AND 

ALICE CLARK, Appellant

V.

KIRBY CORPORATION AND KIRBY INLAND MARINE, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 11th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-09913A

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 04, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Terri Anderson, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 2, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 27, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 455 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-199, CP2018-277.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-16523 Filed 8-1-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALI ASGHAR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71679

Agency No. A058-472-408

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Ali Asghar, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s removal order and denying his motion to remand. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo constitutional claims and

FILED

JAN 06 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-71679

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand. Castillo-Perez v.

INS, 212 F.3d 518, 523 (9th Cir. 2000). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Asghar’s motion to remand.

Asghar contends that his due process rights were violated by the interpretation of

his master calendar hearings into Urdu, rather than his native language of Hindko,

but he has not established prejudice resulting from the alleged violation. See

Perez-Lastor v. INS, 208 F.3d 773, 780 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring both error and

prejudice to prevail on a due process claim based on an incompetent

interpretation). 

 PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1490 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1490

To delay the application of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 2013

Mr. Flake (for himself, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Scott, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Burr, 
Mr. Chambliss, and Mr. Coburn) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To delay the application of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELAY IN APPLICATION OF PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE 
              CARE ACT.

            (1) One-year delay in ppaca provisions scheduled to take 
        effect on or after january 1, 2014.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law, any provision of (including any amendment 
        made by) the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public 
        Law 111-148) or of title I or subtitle B of title II of the 
        Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2011 (Public 
        Law 111-152) that is otherwise scheduled to take effect on or 
        after January 1, 2014, shall not take effect until the date 
        that is one year after the date on which such provision would 
        otherwise have been scheduled to take effect.
            (2) One-year suspension of certain tax increases already in 
        effect.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the 
        case of any tax which is imposed or increased by any provision 
        of (including any amendment made by) the Patient Protection and 
        Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) or of title I or 
        subtitle B of title II of the Health Care and Education 
        Reconciliation Act of 2011 (Public Law 111-152), if such tax or 
        increase takes effect before January 1, 2014, such tax or 
        increase shall not apply during the 1-year period beginning on 
        such date.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charles C. SEARS, Deceased, Adele D. Sears, Petitioner, v. TIDEWATER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 37540.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 18, 1968.

Charles C. Hurt, Orlando, for petitioner.

Monroe E. McDonald, of Sanders, Mc-Ewan, Schwarz & Mims, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks to have this court review by writ of certiorari an order of the Full Commission ruling on an interlocutory order of the deputy commissioner. In accordance with our decision in Direct Oil Corporation v. Brown, 178 So.2d 13 (Fla.1965) the writ is denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,705
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,305
<INVENTORY>                                     72,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,250
<PP&E>                                         316,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                 137,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 643,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,554
<BONDS>                                        512,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,357)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   643,113
<SALES>                                        485,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               485,606
<CGS>                                          343,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  343,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,956
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,366
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        2,319
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,047
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Allen Fowler STEARNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-684.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 16, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Dick DIMOND et al., Appellants, v. Jeanne CIMAROLI, d/b/a Travelers Lounge, Appellee.

No. 71-337.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 15, 1971.

Maynard F. Swanson, Jr., Clearwater, for appellants.

Edwin F. Blanton, of Phillips, McFarland, Gould & Korones, Clearwáter, for ap-pellee.

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

Appellants Dick Dimond, Jerry Alfonso and Carl Lattimer, appeal from an order dismissing Count II of their complaint, transferring the remaining cause to the Civil and Criminal Court of Record, and allowing appellants twenty days within which to plead further. The case was one at law.

Appellee filed her Motion to Quash Interlocutory Appeal and this Court deferred action thereon until the appeal had been heard and considered on the merits.

*259The order appealed from not being final, and not being appealable under FAR 4.2, 32 F.S.A., the appeal must be dismissed on authority of Hancock v. Piper, Fla.1966, 186 So.2d 489; Southern Laundry Co. of Marianna v. Home Ins. Co., Fla.App., 1966, 190 So.2d 39; Simon v. Tampa Electric Company, Fla.App.1967, 198 So.2d 379; Berman Leasing Company v. Brumage, Fla.App.1969, 217 So.2d 359.

Appeal dismissed.

HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
MIDWEST EXPRESS HOLDINGS, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR
THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          24,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                       376
<INVENTORY>                                      3,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,776
<PP&E>                                         156,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,872
<BONDS>                                          3,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,797
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,663
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.83
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.70

     


  ASSIGNMENT FORM


   


  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Craig W. Philips hereby sells, assigns and transfers all of the rights of the undersigned under the attached Warrant (NVCW-79) with respect to the number of shares
    of Non-Voting Common Stock covered thereby set forth below, to:


   


  	
          Name of Assignee

        	
          Address/Email

        	
          No. of Shares

        
	 	 	 
	
          Whetstone Ventures LLC

        	
          [***]

        	
          180,000 (i.e., all vested shares)

        



  

     


  

     


  

     


  

     


  

     


  

     


  

     


  

     


  

     


  
    	 Date as of: 1/1/2020

             	Signature:     

             	 /s/ Craig
                Philips
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Fourth Quarter 1996 and 1995


Rental vacancy rates

                             Fourth       Fourth     Standard     Standard
                            quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                               1996         1995    1996 rate   difference


United States..........         7.7          7.7          0.2          0.2

  Inside MAs...........         7.6          7.7          0.2          0.3
    In central cities..         8.3          8.4          0.3          0.4
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         6.8          6.9          0.3          0.4
  Outside MAs..........         8.3          8.0          0.5          0.6

 Northeast.............         7.1          6.9          0.4          0.5
 Midwest...............         8.2          7.6          0.4          0.6
 South.................         8.5          8.5          0.3          0.4
 West..................         6.7          7.5          0.3          0.5

Homeowner vacancy rates

                             Fourth       Fourth     Standard     Standard
                            quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                               1996         1995    1996 rate   difference


United States..........         1.7          1.6          0.1          0.1

  Inside MAs...........         1.7          1.5          0.1          0.1
    In central cities..         2.1          2.1          0.1          0.2
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         1.5          1.3          0.1          0.1
  Outside MAs..........         1.7          1.7          0.1          0.2

 Northeast.............         1.8          1.5          0.2          0.2
 Midwest...............         1.4          1.3          0.1          0.1
 South.................         1.8          1.7          0.1          0.1
 West..................         1.9          1.8          0.1          0.2
D-1

APPENDIX D

Data Substitution Results for Individual Sites
D-2

The charts and tables on the following pages detail the substitutions that were used for

the sites in and around VISTAS, including BRET1, CHAS1, COHU1, SAMA1, SHRO1,

and SWAN1. The following charts/tables are provided for each site:

• 1st chart: Bar charts by year indicating original RHR data in blue, and substituted

data by species in the standard IMPROVE colors. Substituted days are also

indicated by a black bar underneath the day. The red line indicates the threshold

above which days are counted in the 20% worst days for that year. A red line is

not included for any year that was incomplete and not substituted.

• 2nd chart: Bar charts by year indicating speciation of all data. Days in which all

or part of the day was substituted are indicated by a black bar underneath the day.

The red line indicates the threshold above which days are counted in the 20%

worst days.

• Table: The table lists the regression statistics used to calculate substituted values.

Data represent raw mass value correlations for aerosol collected during 2000-04

for all days, and by quarter.

• Scatter plots: A series of nine scatter plots, showing the distribution of points and

the line fits for the regression statistics that were used to calculate substituted

values. Plots indicate raw data collected at the sites during 2000-04, with donor

sites represented on the x-axis.
D-3
D-4
D-5
D-6
D-7
D-8
D-9
D-10
D-11
D-12
D-13
D-14
D-15
D-16
D-17
D-18
D-19
D-20
D-21
D-22
D-23
D-24
D-25
D-26
D-27
D-28
D-29
D-30
D-31
D-32
D-33
D-34
D-35
D-36
D-37
D-38
D-39
D-40
D-41
D-42
D-43
D-44
D-45
D-46
D-47
D-48
D-49
D-50
D-51
D-52
D-53
D-54
D-55
D-56
D-57
D-58
D-59
D-60
D-61
D-62
D-63
D-64
D-65
D-66
D-67
D-68
D-69
D-70
D-71
D-72
D-73