alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1616

ELENI TADELE, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, 

 Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: January 27, 2010 Decided: February 17, 2010 

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Irena I. Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA I. KARPINSKI, 

Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney 

General, Michael P. Lindemann, Assistant Director, Ethan B. 

Kanter, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Eleni Tadele, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration 

judge’s decision denying her requests for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. 

We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and agree that 

Tadele is statutorily barred from asylum and withholding of 

removal on the ground that she provided material support to a 

terrorist organization. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(2)(A)(v) (2006); 

8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(B)(iv) (2006); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(d)(2) 

(2009).* We therefore deny the petition for review for the 

reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tadele (B.I.A. Apr. 30, 

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

PETITION DENIED

 *

 Although the statutory bar does not extend to deferral of 

removal under the Convention Against Torture, see 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1208.17(a) (2009), Tadele does not challenge the denial of 

this form of relief on appeal. She has therefore waived 

appellate review of this claim. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 

F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004) (finding that failure to raise 

a challenge in an opening brief results in abandonment of that 

challenge).
Joyce Ide 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

November 22,2013 

Shasta Lake Gateway Library 

4150 Ashy Court 

Shasta Lake, California 96019 

Subject: 

Dear Ms. Ide: 

Request to retain public documents at the Shasta Lake Gateway Library for public 

inspection 

Please retain the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's documents sent to you on 

November 7, 2013 at the Shasta Lake Gateway Library for at least 90 days, rather than sixty (60) days 

as stated in the previous letter dated November 7, 2013, for public inspection. These documents 

contain the preliminary decision for the prol'osed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

permit for the expansion of the Sierra Pacific Industries facility located in Anderson, California. We 

have extended the public comment period for this preliminary decision. A copy of the public notice 

regarding the extended public comment period is enclosed. 

Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Enclosure 

Shaheerah Kelly, Env onmental Engineer 

Air Division, Permits Office
#### TURNER v. TURNER.

No. 36008.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 192 So.2d 787.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TRANSPRO,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,459
<INVENTORY>                                     83,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,047
<PP&E>                                          77,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 187,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,167
<BONDS>                                         58,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   187,113
<SALES>                                         48,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,430
<CGS>                                           38,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,455
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    79
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,180)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,519)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,661)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     440
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,221)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Biella, Jan, DCA <jan.biella@state.nm.us>

Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 7:12 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: dmallory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@ResoluteEnergy.com; dinetahdoo@yahoo.com

Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation - New Mexico Historic Preservation Office

For future submittals, we ask federal agencies to submit electronic files to nm.shpo@state.nm.us.  The current New

Mexico State Historic Preservation Officer is Dr. Jeff Pappas.   

Jan V. Biella, RPA

Deputy SHPO, NM State Archaeologist

Historic Preservation Division

407 Galisteo Street, Suite 236

Santa Fe, NM 87501

Ph:  505‐827‐4045

Fax: 505‐827‐6338

Cell: 505‐235‐3968

http://nmhistoricpreservation.org

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 4:03 PM 

To: Biella, Jan, DCA 

Cc: dmallory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@ResoluteEnergy.com; dinetahdoo@yahoo.com; Kelly, Shaheerah 

Subject: NHPA Consultation - New Mexico Historic Preservation Office 

Good afternoon,

Please review the attached documents. Feel free to contact me for questions.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00255

- CR



### L ATRICIA 

### T YLER



### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Criminal

Court No. 2

of Tarrant Cou nty (1460191)

November 1 , 2018

Opinion by Justice Meier

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is a ffirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
Status of Terminal Plan Submittals

October 2009

The Air Resources Board has received 28 terminal pl ans for facilities located at the ports of Hueneme, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakl and, San Diego, and San Francisco. These plans indicate that all facilitie s plan to install grid-based shore power systems. In addition, three terminals will r eceive visits from fleets using alternative control technologies. For questions on the terminal plans, please contact Grant Chin, at 916-327-5602 or at gchin@arb.ca.gov

.
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  First Quarter 2006 and 2007

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   First Quarter 2006

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West 
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.7       7.8       9.6      11.6       8.1
      For rent...........................      2.9       2.5       3.6       3.1       2.3
      For sale only......................      1.3       0.9       1.6       1.4       1.0
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.9       0.7       0.8       0.9       0.9
      Held off market....................      4.7       3.7       3.7       6.1       3.9
        For occasional use...............      1.5       1.0       0.8       1.9       1.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      1.1       1.1       0.8       1.4       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.1       1.7       2.1       2.8       1.3

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.1       4.0       2.7       3.0       3.0

    Occupied.............................     87.2      88.2      87.8      85.3      88.9



                                                   First Quarter 2007


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................       100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................     10.5       8.1      10.2      12.8       9.0
      For rent...........................      3.1       2.4       3.4       3.8       2.3
      For sale only......................      1.7       1.1       1.9       2.0       1.5
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.9       0.7       0.8       0.9       0.9
      Held off market....................      4.8       3.9       4.1       6.1       4.3
        For occasional use...............      1.6       0.9       0.9       2.1       1.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      1.0       0.9       0.8       1.3       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.3       2.1       2.5       2.7       1.6

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.3       4.3       2.8       3.1       3.2

    Occupied.............................     86.2      87.6      87.0      84.1      87.8
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver) as Receiver for the institution listed below intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. Notice of Intent To Terminate Receivership
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Date of
                             appointment 
                             of receiver10407
Decatur First Bank
Decatur
GA
10/21/2011
 The liquidation of the assets for the receivership has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors. Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing, identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201. No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame. Dated at Washington, DC, on August 2, 2018. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2018-16833 Filed 8-6-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1913 

To make permanent the Payments in Lieu of Taxes program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 13, 2014 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To make permanent the Payments in Lieu of Taxes program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES. 

4 Section 6906 of title 31, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘of fiscal years 2008 through 2013’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘fiscal year’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Bennie Eddie DEMPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-585.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Robert W. HENDERSON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 72-944.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 14, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury United States Mint
 AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing pricing for the Presidential Silver Medals Program as follows: Product
Retail priceGeorge Washington Presidential Silver Medal
$39.95John Adams Presidential Silver Medal
39.95Remaining Presidential Silver Medals
39.95
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Veronica Anderson, Program Manager for Numismatic and Bullion; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW; Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500. Authority:
                        31 U.S.C. 5111(a)(2) Dated: July 27, 2018. David J. Ryder, Director, United States Mint.


[FR Doc. 2018-16441 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gladys MONETTE.

No. 61260.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Gladys Monette, applying for cer-tiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Natchitoches.

Writ denied.
No. 11061.

#### First National Bank of Upper Sandusky *v.*The People's Savings Banking Co.

Decided October 19, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Wyandot county.

*Mr. D. C. Parker*and *Messrs. Carter & Goodrich,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Balyeat & Conn*and *Messrs. Carey & Carey,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Spear and Shaucic, JJ., concur.
No. 00-7181.

#### Rogers *v.*Robinson, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11295.

#### McCallip, Adminstratrix, et al. *v.*Sharp.

Decided November 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Mr. J. W. Mooney*and *Mr. Edmund, Smith,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. W. II. Jones; Mr. F. A. Davis*and *Messrs. Booth, Keating & Peters,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**BAGELL, JOSEPHS, LEVINE & COMPANY, L.L.C.**Certified Public Accountants

High Ridge CommonsSuites 400-403200 Haddonfield Berlin RoadGibbsboro, New Jersey 08026(856) 346-2828  Fax (856) 346-2882

Securities and Exchange CommissionWashington, D.C. 20549

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We consent to the use in this 10-KSB of our report dated September 30, 2005, relating to the financial statements of Conolog Corporation ;and to the reference to our Firm under the caption “Experts” in the Prospectus.

|   | /s/  Bagell, Josephs, Levine & Company, LLC |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                      |
|   | Bagell, Josephs, Levine & Company, LLC           |

Gibbsboro, New JerseyOctober 26, 2005

----
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1780 

To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated pursuant 

to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Investor 

Protection Corporation, and the Public Company Accounting Oversight 

Board is not subject to the sequester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. MURPHY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated pursuant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act 

of 1933, the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, 

and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 

is not subject to the sequester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION. 

4 Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer5 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) does 

6 not apply with respect to the funding of— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1780 IS

1 (1) the standard setting body designated pursu2 ant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 

3 (15 U.S.C. 77s(b)); 

4 (2) the Securities Investor Protection Corpora5 tion; or 

6 (3) the Public Company Accounting Oversight 

7 Board. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Gabriel Battista, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Talk America Holdings, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 August 12, 2003
 /s/ Gabriel Battista
 Gabriel Battista
 Chief Executive Officer
#### Richard Duane BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43975.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 24, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 278 So.2d 642.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
**Record of Ex Parte Contacts**

Docket No. FAA
- 2011
- 1419 Directorate Identifier: 2010
- NM - 281
- AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  (You might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ **Ex Parte Contacts** .”) ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE Boeing Don Jenson 7/14/2010 ATA Jo e White 12/7/2010

Other/Additional Information: