alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,OFFICE,OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

,. .-: 

AUSTIN _ 

‘. 

Q-GUANN I 

.” ? 

IlrwmlsYopr- _ 

. . 

, 

- . 

gonorable i. S. UurchiOOn 

the fiftecntb of' 

dated on tha day 

arrants 

pient of assistance dies 

but prlor to the cashing 

nissible under existing 

*If the first question is answered in the 

negative, is it peAulssiblefor the Department to 

can&e1 the warrant issued to the recipient and reissue a warrant to the administrator of the estate 

or some porson legally responsible for the pwgment 

of the rcoipfent's debtst* '. ~, 

._ 

, 
. ' !'?<""' 

: 

\ . .' 

.: : 

~, ~. py- m 

. . .. ,, ,I 

.~_._ :. - . . . 

. . 

n0norpb10 J , 8. Murohieon - page 8 . i '. :,, 

. ;.- 

, *.:_ _ 

: 

" ._, 

* .~. '. ,.'~. 

In our Opfaion the varrrrnts inquired about are , 

transferable, and m;ay be paid to any one who hold8 sue, ~, I 

properly endorsed. .. 

z 

If tb0 payee~namod~~ the warrant dIea before 

he endOrscs'sanw3, the warrant aan only be,paid to liio a& 

dnlstrator, hoire.or.pard.ian. 

The unpa%Q’..arrant can not be o+ny~ll& by pu . 

pad a m3v'aarrant i'ssued.~n'lleu thereof. 

':. 

. . 

eeo. u. Bar01113 

- . 

. . 

. 

;. 

. . 

* 

I 

: 

,.: 

. : 

.
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  First Quarter 2002 and 2001

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     First quarter 2002
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       9.2        8.5       11.7
      For rent............................       2.9        3.1        2.2
      For sale only.......................       1.0        1.0        1.2
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.6        0.6        0.6
      Held off market.....................       4.6        3.8        7.7
        For occasional use................       1.5        1.1        2.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.9        0.9        0.9
        For other reasons.................       2.2        1.7        4.0

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.5        7.9

    Occupied..............................      88.0       90.0       80.4



                                                     First quarter 2001
Type of housing unit
                                              United   Inside     Outside
                                              States     MAs        MAs

All housing units.........................       100        100        100

    Year-round vacant.....................       8.9        8.1       11.8
      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.3
      For sale only.......................       0.9        0.8        1.3
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.7        0.7        0.6
      Held off market.....................       4.7        4.0        7.6
        For occasional use................       1.5        1.2        2.8
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere....       1.0        1.0        1.0
        For other reasons.................       2.3        1.8        3.8

    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.5        8.0

    Occupied..............................      88.2       90.3       80.1
258 La. 250

#### Succession of Noemie CAMPBELL, wife of Justin BLANCHARD, and Justin Blanchard. Succession of Raymond H. CAMPBELL. Succession of Elizabeth C. Kean CAMPBELL, widow of Raymond H. Campbell.

No. 51234.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 29, 1971.

In re: Elizabeth E. Campbell, Althee M. Campbell, Raymond H. Campbell and Ruth V. Campbell and Martin B. Campbell applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. Under the facts found, there is no error of law.
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  


           First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

2000.....    67.1     67.2     67.7     67.5
1999.....    66.7     66.6     67.0     66.9
1998.....    65.9     66.0     66.8     66.4
1997.....    65.4     65.7     66.0     65.7
1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2

1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4

\r Revised.
#### Oscar C. TILGHMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-149.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 22, 1969.

George T. Kelly, III, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have surveyed the record on the basis of the defendant’s two appellate points. We find the verdict to he supported by adequate competent evidence and are of the opinion that error has not been demonstrated.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.78


 


AMENDMENT TO


 


MEMBERSHIP INTEREST PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment dated as of
September 15, 2022 (“Amendment”) amends the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (this “Agreement”),
dated as of December 21, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), by and among La Rosa Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation
(the “Buyer”), and MARIA FLORES-GARCIA, (the “Seller”), and HOREB KISSIMMEE REALTY LLC, a Florida
limited liability company located at 3032 Dyer Blvd., Kissimmee Florida 34741 (the “Company,” and together with the
Buyer and Seller, the “Parties,” and individually, the “Parties”).”


 


The Parties hereby agree to
amend the Agreement as follows:


 


		1.	Schedule A of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



 


SCHEDULE A


 


	Buyer:	 	La Rosa Holdings Corp.
	Company:	 	HOREB KISSIMMEE

REALTY LLC
	Seller:	 	MARIA FLORES-GARCIA
	Percentage of Seller’s Membership Interest in the Company being sold to the Buyer:	 	51%
	Aggregate Purchase Price:	 	$3,068,133.50
	Cash:	 	$500,000.00
	Common Stock (1):	 	Shares valued at $2,568,133.50


 


	 	(1)	The number of shares issued will be the dollar amount of the Common Stock divided by the final sales price of the Company’s common stock in its underwritten public offering.


  


 1.       Except as otherwise stated herein, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.




 


2.       All
matters relating to this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Florida without
giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of Florida or any other jurisdiction).


 


3.       This
Amendment and the schedules and exhibits to be delivered hereunder constitute the sole and entire agreement of the Parties with respect
to the subject matter contained herein, and supersede all prior and contemporaneous understandings and agreements, both written and oral,
with respect to such subject matter hereof.


 


4.       This
Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to be
one and the same agreement. A signed copy of this Amendment delivered by facsimile, e-mail, or other means of electronic transmission
shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy of this Agreement.


  


[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE NEXT PAGE.]


 




    	 



     


    

  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties
hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date set forth above by their respective representatives thereunto duly authorized.


 


	Buyer:	LA ROSA HOLDINGS CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Joseph La Rosa

	 	Name:	Joseph La Rosa
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	Company:	HOREB KISSIMMEE REALTY LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Maria Flores-Garcia

	 	Name:	Maria Flores-Garcia
	 	Title:	Authorized Member
	 	 	 
	Seller:	MARIA FLORES-GARCIA
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Maria Flores-Garcia

	 	Name:	Maria Flores-Garcia
	 	Address: 	3032 Dyer Blvd., Kissimmee Florida
	 	 	34741
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Second Quarter 1995 and 1994      
                                                                                         
                                                                                        
                                           Rental vacancy rate                   Homeowner vacancy rate     
                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                      
                                      Second  Second  Standard   Standard  Second   Second  Standard   Standard  
                                      quarter quarter error on   error on  quarter  quarter error on   error on  
                                       1995    1994   1995 rate  difference  1995    1994   1995 rate  difference 
                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                      
 United States........................ 7.7     7.4       0.2      0.2        1.6     1.4       0.1      0.1 
                              
  Northeast........................... 7.5     7.1       0.4      0.5        1.5     1.4       0.1      0.2 
  Midwest............................. 7.1     7.1       0.4      0.5        1.3     1.1       0.1      0.1
  South............................... 8.2     7.7       0.3      0.4        1.8     1.6       0.1      0.1
  West................................ 7.7     7.3       0.3      0.5        1.8     1.5       0.1      0.2
                     
 Note:  Metropolitan/nonmetropolitan data not shown this quarter, see  
        page 2 of the press release for explanation.
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
                         CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
                             UNION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN
                               (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED
                           EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 1989)



               The Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation Union Employee
          Savings Plan is hereby amended as follows:

               1.   The following new Section 7.08 is added to the Plan:

                    "7.08  (a)  During the period from December 6,
               1995 through December 22, 1995, Participants will be
               entitled to make an investment election under the Plan
               in addition to the one quarterly change allowed under
               the Plan.  This election will not be counted as the
               once per quarter change for any Participant who has
               already executed his quarterly change or for any
               Participant who has not yet executed a change during
               that quarter.

                         (b)  Effective December 26, 1995, the "U.S.
               Government Income Trust Fund" investment option is
               eliminated.  If any Participant who has elected to have
               amounts invested in such Fund does not affirmatively elect
               otherwise, such investment direction will be deemed to be a
               direction to invest in the Stable Value Fund, effective
               December 26, 1995, and the investment of any such amounts,
               and future contributions, if applicable, shall be invested
               instead in the Stable Value Fund."

               2.   Except as hereinabove modified and amended, the Amended

          and Restated Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company hereby executes this Fourth

          Amendment this 31st day of October, 1995.

          ATTEST:                       CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION



          Mark Dudzik                   By:  Frank H. Livingston
          -----------------------            -----------------------------
                                           Its  Vice President<PAGE>
262 La. 1101

#### Arthur ARABIE v. HARDWARE MUTUAL CASUALTY et al.

No. 52678.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1972.

In re: Arthur Arabie and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of More-house. 263 So.2d 421.

Application denied; on the facts found by the court of appeal, its judgment is correct.
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Barry
C. Kaye, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Coates International, Ltd., certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coates International, Ltd. (the
"Company");





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and I
have:





(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and





(c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and to
the audit committee of the Company's board of directors:





(a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and





6. I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.




May 14,
      2008
              
              /s/Barry
      C. KayeBarry
      C. KayeTreasurer,
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofParticle Drilling Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Chris Boswell, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ J. Chris Boswell                |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Chris Boswell                    |
| Chief Executive Officer  and        |
| Chief Financial Officer             |
|                                |
| Date:   December 14, 2005 |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ParticleDrilling Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Particle DrillingTechnologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
#### Jerry Wayne BLOW, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43522.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 29, 1973.

Dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          TransMontaigne Oil Company
                             List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             State/Country of     Ownership of   
                      Name of Subsidiary                       Organization        Subsidiary     Trade Name
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>                <C>             <C> None
Bear Paw Energy Inc.                                           Colorado              100%             None
GOIN, Inc.                                                     Colorado              100%             None
Interenergy Sheffield Processing Company (Canada) Ltd.         Canada                100%             None
K123 Corporation                                               Colorado              100%             None
Razorback Pipeline Company                                     Delaware               60%             None
Republic Natural Gas Company                                   Kansas                100%             None
TransMontaigne Canada Ltd.                                     Canada                100%             None  
TransMontaigne Holding Inc.                                    Arkansas               65%             None
TransMontaigne Pipeline Inc.                                   Arkansas              100%             None
TransMontaigne Product Services Inc.                           Arkansas              100%             None
TransMontaigne Terminaling Inc.                                Arkansas              100%             Razorback Terminaling Co.
TransMontaigne Transportation Services Inc.                    Arkansas              100%             None
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED I, Peter J. Kight, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CheckFree
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ Peter J. KightPeter J. KightChairman and Chief Executive Officer
CheckFree Corporation
#### In re ESTATE of Albert C. BURKITT, Deceased. Kathryn ANTULSKA, Appellant, v. Edward BOOTH et al., Appellees.

No. 70-861.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.