alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012044EN.01000101.xml

| 16.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6456 — EDF/Kogeneracja)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 44/01

On 8 February 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6456. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6456. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0039

SAT Date: 11/5/2013

Print Date: 6/4/2014

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E; SENS-S; UNCERT NEURO; AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0039

FATE: Estimations for low weight 

Solid with MP = 310 C (E)

log Kow = -5.48 (E) 

S > 10 g/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 1.00 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E) 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption; OECD 301B(Mod Sturm CO2 ev): 80%/28d RB.

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is moderate through the GI tract and good 

through the lung, while absorption of the neat material is nil through the skin, but poor through 

the skin for the material in solution, based on physical/chemical properties. Expect some 

digestion of the PMN substance in the GI tract. There are concerns for eye irritation and skin 

sensitization, as well as uncertain concern for neurotoxicity, based on 

compounds.

 Test Data: Submitted with the PMN (read across data for analogs 

Negative in the Salmonells assay with and without activation;

Negative in the E. coli reverse mutation assay with and without activation;

Not a dermal irritant in humans (EPISKIN in vitro test);

Not a dermal irritant in humans (EpiDerm Skin Model in vitro Toxicity Test);

Not a dermal irritant in humans (Repeat Patch Insult in vivo test);

Not a dermal irritant in humans (Occlusive Patch in vivo test);

Slight eye irritant in humans (Ocular Irritancy Potentials Test on cultured fibroblasts);

Slight eye irritant in chickens (Hen's Egg Chorioallantoic Membrane Test);

Not an eye irritant in humans (Skinethic Reconstituted Human Corneal Model test);

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 6.3

daphnid 48-h LC50 3.1

green algal 96-h EC50 1.7

fish _ chronic value 0.63

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.31

algal _ chronic 

value

0.63

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR nearest analog for Amphoteric 

 SAR chemical class = Amphoteric MW 269; pH7; effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <180.0 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

31

SARs amphoteric 

SAR Class -amphoteric

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat, 564-7653

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00035-CV

IN RE JEROME WALL RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and WALKER, J.

DELIVERED: March 3, 2011

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  1965 to 2004

   Year     First    Second     Third     Fourth
           Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter

2004....        68.6
2003....        68.0      68.0      68.4      68.6
2002\r....      67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2002....        67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2001....        67.5      67.7      68.1      68.0
2000....        67.1      67.2      67.7      67.5

1999....        66.7      66.6      67.0      66.9
1998....        65.9      66.0      66.8      66.4
1997....        65.4      65.7      66.0      65.7
1996....        65.1      65.4      65.6      65.4
1995....        64.2      64.7      65.0      65.1
1994....        63.8      63.8      64.1      64.2
1993\r....      63.7      63.9      64.2      64.2
1993....        64.2      64.4      64.7      64.6
1992....        64.0      63.9      64.3      64.4
1991....        63.9      63.9      64.2      64.2
1990....        64.0      63.7      64.0      64.1
1989\r....      63.9      63.8      64.1      63.8

1989....        63.9      63.9      64.0      63.8
1988....        63.7      63.7      64.0      63.8
1987....        63.8      63.8      64.2      64.1
1986....        63.6      63.8      63.8      63.9
1985....        64.1      64.1      63.9      63.5
1984....        64.6      64.6      64.6      64.1
1983....        64.7      64.7      64.8      64.4
1982....        64.8      64.9      64.9      64.5
1981....        65.6      65.3      65.6      65.2
1980....        65.5      65.5      65.8      65.5
1979\r....      64.8      64.9      65.8      65.4

1979....        65.3      65.1      66.0      65.8
1978....        64.8      64.4      65.2      65.4
1977....        64.8      64.5      65.0      64.9
1976....        64.6      64.6      64.9      64.8
1975....        64.4      64.9      64.6      64.5
1974....        64.8      64.8      64.6      64.4
1973....        64.9      64.4      64.4      64.4
1972....        64.3      64.5      64.3      64.4
1971....        64.0      64.1      64.4      64.5
1970....        64.3      64.0      64.4      64.0
1969....        64.1      64.4      64.4      64.4
1968....        63.6      64.1      64.1      63.6
1967....        63.3      63.9      63.8      63.5
1966....        63.5      63.2      63.3      63.8
1965....        62.9      62.9      62.9      63.4
\r Revised.
November , 2014 Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 - i

... _ ·

.._

Re: Continuation ofAlaskaAirlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wrangell, and Yakutat, Alaska, Docket OST-1998-4899 Dear Mr. Schlemmer : This letter is to express strong supportforthe selection ofAlaskaAirlines to continue to provide essential airservice to our community. Alaska's service connects SoutheastAlaska passengers to one or more major communities ofinterest, with single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access the airline's extensive route system and benefitfrom its marketing relationships with other carriers. The passenger and cargo aircraft, which AlaskaAirlines proposes to continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacitythat other carriers simply cannot provide. Further, AlaskaAirlines aircraft are equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology, which enables the airline to reliably accessthe airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the community. Simply put, Alaska Airlines' service is critical to the economicwell being ofour community and 

### 11 support their application to provide Essential AirService to Southeast Alaska. As a lodge ownerwe depend on being able to get our customers into Petersburg on regular scheduled flights. Withoutthem we would not be able to exist. Sincerely, Robert 

### & Deborah Bailey Alaska Sport Haven Lodge.
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Norman CORNWELL, Appellee.

No. 73-1091.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 17, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2012033EN.01000301.xml

| 7.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6091 — Galenica/Fresenius Medical Care/Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 33/02

On 5 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6091. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6091. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB09-CR.17 **Contact:**  Eun Kim

Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, DEC. 30, 2009 Media Advisory — National 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to Hartford Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 
13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. Beginning at New York City's Times Square, and at each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 
2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why "I count!" and view messages from other Road Tour participants.
  
  
  For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Augustine DeGENNARO, Appellant, v. Florence Ann DeGENNARO, Appellee.

No. 68-5.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 21, 1968.

Rehearing Denied June 10, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and

                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Fourth Quarter 2003 and 2004



(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)







                                                     Fourth Quarter 2003

Type of housing unit

                                              United   Inside     Outside

                                              States     MAs        MAs



All housing units.........................       100        100        100



    Year-round vacant.....................       9.7        9.2       11.8

      For rent............................       3.1        3.3        2.4

      For sale only.......................       1.1        1.0        1.3

      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.9        0.7

      Held off market.....................       4.7        3.9        7.4

        For occasional use................       1.6        1.3        2.7

        Temporarily occupied by persons

        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8

        For other reasons.................       2.3        1.8        3.9



    Seasonal vacant.......................       3.1        1.6        8.8



    Occupied..............................      87.2       89.2       79.4







                                                     Fourth Quarter 2004

Type of housing unit

                                              United   Inside     Outside

                                              States     MAs        MAs



All housing units.........................        100        100       100



    Year-round vacant.....................       9.5        9.1       11.2

      For rent............................       3.0        3.3        2.1

      For sale only.......................       1.1        1.1        1.3

      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.7        0.8        0.7

      Held off market.....................       4.6        3.9        7.1

        For occasional use................       1.6        1.2        2.9

        Temporarily occupied by persons

        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.9        0.9        1.0

        For other reasons.................       2.1        1.8        3.2



    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.6        7.5



    Occupied..............................      87.6       89.4       81.3
Exhibit 10.1

                                 DESCRIPTION OF
          EGAMES, INC. FISCAL 2001 EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


         On July 26,  2000,  the  Board  of  Directors  of  eGames,  Inc.  ("the
Company")   approved  the  adoption  of  a   company-wide   Employee   Incentive
Compensation Plan (the "Plan").  The amount of incentive  compensation that each
Company employee is eligible to earn under the Plan is contingent on the Company
achieving  certain  net income  objectives.  Under the Plan,  each  employee  is
eligible to earn a specified percentage of the employee's total annual salary in
incentive compensation.  These percentages range from 10% of the annual salaries
for  administrative  employees  to 50% of the  annual  salaries  for  the  Chief
Executive Officer and Executive Vice President.

         No bonuses will be earned until the Company has earned net income of at
least  $750,000  (the  "Minimum  Threshold")  during the 2001 fiscal year.  Upon
reaching  the  Minimum  Threshold,  plus the amount  required to pay the bonuses
earned if the Minimum  Threshold were achieved,  then 50% of the potential bonus
to which each employee was eligible would be earned. If net income of $1,500,000
(the 100%  Threshold")  is earned  during the 2001 fiscal year,  plus the amount
required to pay the bonuses earned when that net income level had been achieved,
then 100% of the potential  bonus to which each  employee was eligible  would be
earned.

         If the  Company  earns net  income  during  the 2001  fiscal  year that
exceeds  the  Minimum  Threshold,  plus the amount  required  to pay the bonuses
earned,  then each  employee  would earn a bonus equal to the  percentage of the
potential  bonus to which they were eligible equal to the percentage of earnings
as measured  against the 100%  Threshold.  For  example,  if an employee  earned
$50,000  per year and was  eligible  to earn a bonus  equal to 10% of his or her
salary if the 100% Threshold were met, then that employee would be paid a $5,000
bonus if the 100% Threshold were met.

         On the date of adoption of the Plan,  based on the number of  employees
of the Company and their  respective bonus  percentages,  the Company would have
been required to achieve pre-bonus  earnings of approximately  $1,100,000 during
the 2001  fiscal  year in order to earn the  minimum  bonus  (50%).  There is no
maximum incentive compensation level. If the Company exceeds the 100% Threshold,
then additional incentive compensation will be earned on a linear basis.

     Any  bonuses  earned  under  this  Plan  will  be  paid  subsequent  to the
completion of the 2001 fiscal year's financial statement audit.
#### FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, etc., Appellant, v. Carl POTTER and Myrtle Potter, his wife, and Roger A. Pilkington, Appellees.

No. 69-456.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 1, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
ALFONZA WARD,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1397

Opinion filed April 13, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari – Original Jurisdiction.

Alfonza Ward, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROBERTS, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
# <------" 

# ~s flYMCW'

,,-,' v -:J "

__ / 'J J 

### Mason CityMunicipalAirport March 20, 2014 Mr. Kevin Schlemmer Chief, Essential Air Service Division U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofthe Secretary ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 

## LJI~:;.',R 20 P J 

## Sl

RE: Request/or Comments/or Essential Air Service Proposals Submitted February 21,2014 Docket Number: OST-2001-10684; Mason City Docket Number: OST-2001-10682; Fort Dodge Dear Mr. Schlemmer: The Mason City Airport Commission met in special session yesterday afternoon and unanimously voted to reject both ofthe RFP's submitted by Air Choice One and Great Lakes Aviation to the Department of Transportation onFebruary 21, 2014 and allow for another round of solicitation for proposals for Mason City and Fort Dodge. The reason forthis request istobe able to explore all opportunities and avenues with air carriers on proposals that will meet the needs ofour communities. In addition, wehave the following concerns with the two proposals submitted:
• Great lakes Aviation, LTD, concerns with past experience regarding unreliability and

non-competitive fares.
• Multi-Aero Inc. d/b/a Air Choice One utilizing asingle engine aircraft as opposed to a

twin engine aircraft and the affect that has on the duration ofthe flight. Our communities have been able to support larger seat aircraft with more available annual seats. Weare extremely concerned with the language of49 USC 41742 which couldjeopardize our ability toreceive twin-engine aircraft ifwehave single-engine aircraft service for 60 consecutive days. It is counterproductive to the long term development and success ofair service to keep reducing the seat capacities atour respective communities. We will respectfully await the EAS Department ofTransportation's decision regarding our request. Sincerely,

Pamela Osgood, Airport Manager
# C_2011324EN.01000101.xml

| 9.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6243 — CE Gas Marketing & Trading/Verbundnetz Gas Aktiengesellschaft/VNG Austria)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 324/01

On 4 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6243. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6243. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---