alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         326,094
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  267,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,001
<INVENTORY>                                    260,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,963,265
<PP&E>                                      28,455,224
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,285,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,745,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,061,759
<BONDS>                                      7,290,299
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,537,441
<COMMON>                                    12,664,752
<OTHER-SE>                                     457,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,745,555
<SALES>                                     26,658,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,658,764
<CGS>                                        8,291,621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,291,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,285,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             355,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                699,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                   279,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            419,851
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   419,851
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  First Quarter 2000 and 1999

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   First quarter 2000


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      8.7       7.5       7.9      10.5       7.5
      For rent...........................      2.5       1.9       2.3       3.1       2.3
      For sale only......................      1.0       0.7       0.9       1.1       1.0
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.6       0.5       0.7       0.7       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.5       4.3       3.9       5.6       3.5
        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.5       0.9       2.1       1.4
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.8       0.9       0.9       0.7
        For other reasons................      2.2       2.1       2.2       2.6       1.4

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.9       3.9       2.6       2.8       2.8

    Occupied.............................     88.4      88.6      89.5      86.7      89.8




                                                   First quarter 1999

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.2       7.9       8.2      11.3       7.8
      For rent...........................      2.6       2.3       2.4       3.1       2.4
      For sale only......................      1.1       0.8       0.9       1.4       1.0
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.7       0.6       0.8       0.8       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.8       4.2       4.1       6.0       3.8
        For occasional use...............      1.7       1.3       0.9       2.4       1.4
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.8       0.7       0.9       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.3       2.1       2.5       2.7       1.7

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.6       3.7       2.4       2.3       2.5

    Occupied.............................     88.2      88.4      89.4      86.4      89.7
#### SOL WALKER & COMPANY v. Fred HATFIELD, Jr.

No. 38688.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2003 and for
the period then ended.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|/s/    THOS. E. CAPPS                                             
|                                                                  
|Thos. E. Capps President and Chief Executive Officer March 1, 2004

|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/S/    THOMAS N. CHEWNING                                                            
|                                                                                     
|Thomas N. Chewning Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 1, 2004



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Consolidated Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Consolidated Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### James H. AKLES, Appellant, v. Lyle R. HOLLAND, Appellee.

No. 70-613.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 21, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 1971.

Robert J. Carroll, of Muscarella & Peren-ich, P. A., Clearwater, for appellant.

Carleton L. Weidemeyer, of Wightman, Rowe & Weidemeyer, Clearwater, for ap-pellee.

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

James H. Akles, plaintiff in the trial court, brings this appeal from a directed verdict entered in favor of defendant Lyle R. Holland. Testimony in the trial court showed that appellant Akles was hired by appellee Holland to assist in the demolition of a building in the City of Clearwater. Appellant’s job involved helping Holland load debris into a truck. Holland was placing the debris into the truck, and Akles was standing on top of the truck arranging the materials so that more could be put into one load. At some point, the crane bucket hit Akles and caused him to be thrown to the ground. As a result of the fall from the truck, appellant suffered injuries to his heels.

Akles brought suit against Holland alleging negligent operation of the crane. Holland’s answer to the complaint denied negligence and alleged contributory negligence by appellant Akles. At the close of appellant’s case, appellee moved for a directed verdict, and this motion was granted on the basis that appellant was contribu-torily negligent, as a matter of law. Specifically, the court said, “All facts which would show Mr. Holland negligent would also show * * * the plaintiff negligent.”

Contributory negligence is normally a question for the jury and only when there is *no basis*upon which the plaintiff should be permitted to recover because of his own negligence is a court justified in taking a case from the jury on the basis of contributory negligence. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Butler, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 499. This is not the case here. We do not agree that anyone who would find Mr. Holland negligent would also find Mr. Akles negligent. Reasonable men might differ in their findings. While a jury would be warranted in returning a verdict *721for defendant on a finding that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, the jury might instead reach the conclusion that the acts of the defendant were the sole proximate cause of Aides’ injuries. Wagner v. McCormick, Fla.App.1963, 153 So.2d 860.

A review of the record reveals questions of fact that should be decided by a jury. For these reasons we reverse and remand for action consistent with this opinion.

HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
#### LINDSLEY INDUSTRIES, INC., a corporation authorized to do business in Florida, Appellant, v. The DELTONA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation authorized to do business in Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-714.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 4, 1972.

Robert W. Beaudry, of Lyons & Beau-dry, Sarasota, for appellant.

Kirk, Pinkerton, Sparrow, McClelland & Savary, Sarasota, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Tarlow v. Helmholtz, Fla.App.2d 1967, 198 So.2d 109; Stancil v. Gardner, Fla.App.2d 1966, 192 So.2d 340; Crane Co. v. Fine, Fla.1969, 221 So.2d 145.

PIERCE, C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:

                  Fourth Quarter 2003 and 2004



(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)





                                                   Fourth Quarter 2003



Type of housing unit

                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West

                                           States     east      West



All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100



    Year-round vacant....................      9.7       8.0       8.7      12.3       8.0

      For rent...........................      3.1       2.3       3.0       3.8       2.8

      For sale only......................      1.1       0.6       1.2       1.4       1.0

      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.7       0.9       0.9       0.8

      Held off market....................      4.7       4.3       3.7       6.2       3.3

        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.4       0.6       2.4       1.5

        Temporarily occupied by persons

        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.9       0.7       0.9       0.6

        For other reasons................      2.3       2.0       2.4       2.9       1.2



    Seasonal vacant......................      3.1       3.5       3.4       2.7       3.0



    Occupied.............................     87.2      88.5      87.9      85.0      89.0







                                                   Fourth Quarter 2004





                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West

                                           States     east      West



All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100



    Year-round vacant....................      9.5       7.9       9.5      11.4       7.7

      For rent...........................      3.0       2.3       3.3       3.5       2.5

      For sale only......................      1.1       0.7       1.5       1.2       0.9

      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.7       0.7       0.7       0.8       0.7

      Held off market....................      4.6       4.2       4.0       5.8       3.5

        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.2       0.8       2.2       1.7

        Temporarily occupied by persons

        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       1.1       1.0       1.0       0.6

        For other reasons................      2.1       1.9       2.2       2.7       1.3



    Seasonal vacant......................      2.9       3.6       2.6       2.7       2.8



    Occupied.............................     87.6      88.5      87.9      85.9      89.6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act                           ( print page 38307)                        (12 U.S.C. 1461*et seq.*) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a savings association and nonbanking companies owned by the savings and loan holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 10(c)(4)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 28, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis*                     (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

                    1.                     *MidCountry Acquisition Corp., Minneapolis, Minnesota;*                     to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of MidCountry Bank, Bloomington, Minnesota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 31, 2018.

Yao-Chin Chao,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-16702 Filed 8-3-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
#### Frank NOLAN, Jr., doing business as Nolan Motor Co., Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN LAKE WORTH, a national banking corporation, Appellee.

No. 1526.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June *4,*1968.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Jerome WILCOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-95.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 25, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
254 La. 130

#### Allie McGee WEST, Individually and for her minor children v. RYDER TRUCK LINES, INC., et al.

No. 49747.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Allie McGee West, individually and for her minor children applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 218 So.2d 106.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
From: Christopher Bolduc [mailto:cabolduc@lbl.gov]  

Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 3:27 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: rick.anderson@faypwc.com; tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com;

john.caskey@nema.org; jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com;

john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; adelaski@standardsasap.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org;

gbf1@pge.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; rgreeson@federalpacific.com;

bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; jhodge@howard.com; mhyland@appanet.org;

dave.millure@metglas.com; snadel@aceee.org; wes.patterson@us.abb.com;

Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com;

artrosenfeld@gmail.com; srosenstock@eei.org; rroy@nrdc.org;

robert.saint@nreca.coop; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com;

Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; Jim.creevy@nema.org;

ahofmann@publicpower.org; pkumar@publicpower.org; jmauer@standardsasap.org;

Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com; jrossetti@mlgw.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com;

jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; mwaltner@nrdc.org;

kwinder@mleainc.com; cabolduc@lbl.gov; Brian Coffey; kcoughlin@lbl.gov;

brenda.edwards@ee.doe.gov; jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov; Caitlin Johnson; Zhimei

Luo; emily.marchetti@ee.doe.gov; Michael Rivest; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov;

charlied@uus.org; phopkinson@hvolt.com; James.Lass@cleco.com;

maheshsampat@bellsouth.net; DYoung@energy‐solution.com;

chad.kennedy@us.schneider‐electric.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com;

vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; thomas.patzner@us.schneider‐electric.com;

carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; Raba, Jim

Subject: MV Liquid‐immersed LCC and NIA Results Update

All,

It has been pointed out to me, that some of the labels in the document were

incorrect and may have caused unnecessary confusion. Also, there was an error in

how TSL 4 (domestically available material) was defined for designs lines 1 and

4; this only impacts the results presented on pages 18 and 19.

These oversights have been addressed in the attached file.

Thank you,

‐ Chris Bolduc

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Bolduc <cabolduc@lbl.gov> wrote:

> Dear Committee Members,

>

> Please find the draft LCC and NIA results for liquid‐immersed  

> medium‐voltage transformers (design lines 1 ‐ 5) attached.

>

> A summary of changes and additional sensitivities will be distributed  

> before next week's meeting.

>

> Thank you,

> ‐‐ Chris Bolduc

>

> ‐‐‐‐ 

> Chris Bolduc
> Energy Efficiency Standards Group

> Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National  

> Laboratory t. 416‐535‐7546 c. 647‐832‐4021

>

‐‐  

‐‐‐‐ 

Chris Bolduc

Energy Efficiency Standards Group

Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

t. 416‐535‐7546 c. 647‐832‐4021
261 La. 527

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Johnny DICKERSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52218.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 1972.

In re: Johnny Dickerson applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The relator’s allegations of error are without merit. See evidentiary hearing transcript and transcript of plea and sentence.
259 La. 995

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph GREMILLION v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51872.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1971.

In re: Joseph Gremillion applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. After considering the minutes of this Court and the evidence taken at the hearing below, we find that relator is not entitled to the relief prayed for.

DIXON, J. is of the opinion that the application should be granted. The mutilation of the bill of information by the prosecutor leaves no valid bill in the record to support the penitentiary sentence. This is a fatal defect apparent on the face of the record.
#### CAPITOL BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Walter ROSSER et al., Appellees.

No. 73-778.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 31, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stephen Booker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.