alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tower One Wireless Corp.: Exhibit 10.10 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com


    

    CREDIT AGREEMENT

    This credit agreement is made on the day of July 26, 2018 by and among, EXECUTIVE INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC., FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 14900 NW 42nd Avenue, Suite # 108, MIAMI, FL 33054. Hereinafter known as "Lender".

    and

    TOWER ONE WIRELESS CORP. A COMPANY ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA. 600-535 Howe Street,Vancouver,BC.V6C 227 Hereinafter known as "Borrower".

    Borrower and Lender shall collectively be known herein as "the Parties". In determining the rights and duties of the Parties under the Credit Agreement, the entire document must be read as a whole.

    CREDIT TERMS

    The Borrower and Lender, hereby further set forth their rights and obligations to one another under the Credit Agreement and agreed to be legal bound as follows:

    Loan Payment Terms: Borrower to pay $50.000 US Dollars to Lender, plus 18% annual interest for the life of the loan. Payment of the principal loan and accrued interests shall be due 90 days from the date of execution of this agreement. If the loan is not paid on the due date, the borrower will pay a monthly penalty fee of $250 US per month. In addition to the interest rate the Tower One Wireless Corp. will also issue 500,000 stock options for @ .15 Canadian. The term of these options is for 24 months from issue date.

    Demand by Lender: This is a "demand" loan agreement under which borrower is required to pay back in full the entire outstanding Loan Balance within 15 days of receiving a written demand from Lender or full repayment of the Loan Balance. Delivery of the written notice by Lender to Borrower via U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail shall constitute prima facie evidence of delivery.

    Method of Loan Payment: The Borrower shall make all payments called for under this loan agreement by wire transfer, according to the information included on EXHIBIT A.

    Default: The occurrence of any of the following events shall constitute a Default by the borrower of the terms of this loan agreement:

    • Borrower's failure to pay any amount due as principal or interest on the date required under the loan agreement

    • Borrower seeks an order of relief under the Federal Bankruptcy laws

    • Borrower becomes insolvent

    

    Exclusive Jurisdiction for Suit in Case of Breach: The parties, by entering into this agreement, submit to Jurisdiction in British Columbia, Canada for adjudication of any disputes and/or claims between the parties under this agreement. Furthermore the parties hereby agree that the courts of British Columbia, Canada shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any disputes between the party's relatives to this agreement, whether said disputes sound in contract, tort or other areas of the law.

    State Laws: this agreement shall be interpreted under, and governed by, the laws of British Columbia, Canada.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF and acknowledging acceptance and agreement of the foregoing, Borrower and Lender affix their signatures hereto.
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

237) IV-E-112 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:59 PM Sheet 23 7 of 242 
P.2 

01-25-94 05:23PM FROM EPA RDSD ANN ARBOR TO AIR DOCKET P003/009 

A-Kmf^% W-E-in 

(JBL\ UNITE D STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

SyiSSm+J ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

OFFICE OF 

A«R ANO RADIATION 

JAN 1 3 1994 

MEMORANDUM. 

SUBJECT: Meeting with AAMA regarding ORVR 

FROM: Glenn W, Passavant, Chief y^LmrrmCrr- 10>lHr-lAX^rA 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch 

TO: Public Docket A-87-11 

on January 5, 1994 EPA met briefly with four representatives 

of the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) to 

discuss their concerns regarding the pending onboard refueling vapor 

recovery (ORVR) rule. AAMA was represented by Sam Leonard (GM) , 

Kelly Brown (Ford) , Gordon Allardyce (Chrysler) and Richard Klimisch 

(JVAMA) . EPA yrAs. represented by Dick Wilson, Chet France, and Glenn 

Passavant. AAMA presented their views regarding the inclusion of 

light-duty trucks in the rule, and discussions were held regarding 

concerns about incomplete vehicles and an appropriate definition of 

incomplete vehicle.
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Karen M. Spaun
   ---------------------------------------


Karen M. Spaun
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2004
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Fourth Quarter 1998 and 1997


                             Fourth     Fourth    Standard   Standard
Age of householder           Quarter    Quarter   error on   error on
                                 1998       1997  1998 rate difference

United States..............      66.4       65.7        0.2        0.2

    Less than 25 years.....      19.2       16.7        0.6        0.8
    25 to 29 years.........      36.3       35.2        0.6        0.9
    30 to 34 years.........      53.7       53.5        0.6        0.8
    35 to 39 years.........      64.7       62.8        0.5        0.7
    40 to 44 years.........      70.3       69.0        0.5        0.7
    45 to 49 years.........      73.6       74.3        0.5        0.7
    50 to 54 years.........      76.5       77.5        0.5        0.7
    55 to 59 years.........      81.5       80.3        0.6        0.8
    60 to 64 years.........      82.0       80.2        0.6        0.8
    65 to 69 years.........      82.4       81.8        0.6        0.8
    70 to 74 years.........      81.5       82.0        0.6        0.9
    75 years and over......      76.0       75.8        0.5        0.7

      Less than 35 years...      39.6       38.7        0.4        0.5
      35 to 44 years.......      67.6       65.9        0.4        0.5
      45 to 54 years.......      74.9       75.7        0.4        0.5
      55 to 64 years.......      81.7       80.3        0.4        0.6
      65 years and over....      79.2       79.1        0.3        0.5
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7948

RONNIE VAUGHAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-03-628-AM)

Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 4, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Vaughan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Vaughan seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition

for failure to exhaust state remedies. An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a

§ 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of

appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate

both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether

the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional

right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’”

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Vaughan has not made the

requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 4.A(1)

               INDENTURES OF CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY


The Indentures and Supplemental Indentures between Consolidated Natural Gas
Company and its debenture Trustees, as listed below, are incorporated by
reference to material previously filed with the Commission as indicated:

        Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (now Chemical Bank)
             Indenture dated as of May 1, 1971 (Exhibit (5) to Certificate
                of Notification at Commission File No. 70- 5012)
             Eleventh Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of December 1,
                1986 (Exhibit (5) to Certificate of Notification at Commission
                File No. 70-7079)        
             Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of February 1,
                1989 (Exhibit (5) to Certificate of Notification at Commission
                File No. 70-7336)        
             Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of June 1, 1989
                (Exhibit (5) to Certificate of Notification at Commission File
                No. 70-7336)
             Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of October 1,
                1989 (Exhibit (5) to Certificate of Notification at Commission
                File No. 70-7651)        
             Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of October 1,
                1992 (Exhibit (4) to Certificate of Notification at Commission
                File No. 70-7651)        
             Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of August 1,
                1993 (Exhibit (4) to Certificate of Notification at Commission
                File No. 70-8167)        
             Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of December 1,
                1993 (Exhibit (4) to Certificate of Notification at Commission
                File No. 70-8167)        
             
        United States Trust Company of New York
             Indenture dated as of April 1, 1995 (Exhibit (4) to Certificate of
                Notification at Commission File No. 70-8107)
             
        The Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association)
             Indenture dated as of December 15, 1990 (Exhibit (4A)(1) to
                Consolidated Natural Gas Company's Form 10-K for the year ended
                December 31, 1990, File No. 1-3196)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6077

RONNIE PHILLIPS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-313-3-13BC) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie Phillips appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Phillips v. South Carolina , No. CA-99-313-3-13BC (D.S.C. Dec. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# etab10
#### Preston HENN and Betty Henn, Appellants, v. A. Weldon COOK and Hazel Cook, Appellees.

No. 72-200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification*




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Transderm Laboratories Corporation,
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic
      Report”) pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
      (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), Andy Yurowitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
      Ronald Burghauser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies
      that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for
      the period covered by the Periodic Report.




Date: July 16, 2007
            By:
            /s/Andy
              YurowitzAndy
              YurowitzChief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)




Date: July 16, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Ronald BurghauserRonald
              BurghauserChief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)





*  This
      certification accompanies the Periodic Report to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of Health-Chem Corporation under the Securities
      Act
      of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
      made before or after the date of the Periodic Report), irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.
262 La. 1091

#### Adam G. NUNEZ v. John C. RICKS et al.

No. 52649.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1972.

In re: Adam G. Nunez applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 262 So.2d 585.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
| | 
| | 



|Exhibit 31.2                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|                                                                                            
|CERTIFICATIONS                                                                              
|I, Lawrence A. Heilbronner, certify that:                                                   
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            



|February 18, 2005 |  | /s/ Lawrence A. Heilbronner                     
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date              |  | Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Principal Financial and
|                  |  | Accounting Officer
#### DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Petitioner, v. Hilton CARR et al., Respondents.

No. 69-771.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 6, 1971.

Stuart L. Simon, County Atty., for petitioner.

Carr & Warren, Miami, for respondents.

Before SWANN, C. J., and HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on February 24, 1970 (231 So.2d 844) quashing in part and affirming in part the order of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, in the above cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed July 12, 1971 (250 So.2d 865) and mandate dated July 28, 1971, modified as indicated and otherwise approved this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for appropriate proceedings ;

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the final order of this court heretofore issued in this cause on March 12, 1970 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed February 24, 1970 as modified by the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court where the opinion of this court is in conflict or inconsistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, and the cause is remanded for appropriate proceedings as indicated. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
Exhibit
32.1

SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION



I, Scott M. Carson, Chief Financial Officer of Eye Care International, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted by
sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) |  | the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial  condition and result of
operations of Eye Care International, Inc..    

Dated: September 2, 2004

| | /s/ Scott M.
                                                                  Carson
                                                                  Scott M. Carson
                                                                  Chief
                                                                  Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
##### 



CERTIFICATION
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
Countrywide Financial Corporation; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.
  /s/ Angelo R. MoziloAngelo R. MoziloChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  



           First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

1999.....    66.7     66.6     67.0
1998.....    65.9     66.0     66.8     66.4
1997.....    65.4     65.7     66.0     65.7
1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2

1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4

\r Revised.