alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 10, 2024

NO. 03 - 23 - 00665 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 0066 6 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 0066 7 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 0066 8 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 0066 9 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 70 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 71 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 72 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 73 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 74 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 75 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 76 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 77 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 78 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 79 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 80 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 81 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 82 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 83 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 84 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 85 - CR NO. 0 3 - 23 - 006 86 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 87 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 88 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 89 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 90 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 0 06 91 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 92 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 93 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 94 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 95 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 96 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 97 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 006 98 - CR NO . 03 - 23 - 006 9 9 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 00 700 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 00 701 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 00 7 02 - CRNO. 03 - 23 - 00 703 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 00 704 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 00 705 - CR NO. 03 - 23 - 00706 - CR

Michael Kleinman , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, T RIANA, AND KELLY REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

Th i s is an appeal from the order granting appellee ’ s application for writ of procedendo entered by the trial court

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reve r sible error in the order

. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s order and remands the case for further proceedings c onsistent with this Court ’ s opinion. A ppell ee shall pay all costs relating to th i s appeal , both in this Court and in the c ourt b elow.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0390

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JASON AARON CARRYWATER,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Yvonne Laird, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 20 2022

04/20/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0390
NUMBER 13-22-00376-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE BERRY CONTRACTING, LP D/B/A BAY LTD. AND JUAN 

HERNANDEZ

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras1

Relators Berry Contracting, LP d/b/a Bay Ltd. and Juan Hernandez filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus seeking to set aside a July 28, 2022 order concluding that relators 

“have failed to prove the affirmative defense of exclusive remedy” in a case concerning 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 

47.1 (“The court of appeals must hand down a written opinion that is as brief as practicable but that 

addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal.”); id. R. 47.4 (explaining the 

differences between opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

workers’ compensation. See TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 408.001(a). By previous order, this 

Court ordered the trial court proceedings to be stayed and requested that the real parties 

in interest, Gernal Mann and Jennifer Mann, file a response to the petition for writ of 

mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8, 52.10(b). Subsequently, this Court 

abated the petition for writ of mandamus because the parties had entered into settlement 

discussions. The parties have now filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss Mandamus Proceeding 

and to Lift Stay.” According to this motion, the parties have resolved the matters in the 

underlying case, thereby “rendering moot any further proceedings in this Court.” The 

parties thus request that we lift the stay previously imposed in this case and dismiss the 

petition for writ of mandamus.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the joint motion, is of the opinion 

that it should be granted. See In re Contract Freighters, Inc., 646 S.W.3d 810, 813 (Tex. 

2022) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Heckman v. Williamson County, 369 S.W.3d 137, 

162 (Tex. 2012); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. 

proceeding). Accordingly, we grant the “Joint Motion to Dismiss Mandamus Proceeding 

and to Lift Stay.” We reinstate this case. We lift the stay previously imposed in this original 

proceeding, and we dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8, 52.10(b).

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the

27th day of October, 2022.
Table 9.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  1997 and 1996

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                          Standard
                                          error on Standard     1997
Type                        1997     1996     1997 error on  Percent
                        estimate estimate estimate differencof total

All housing units....... 115,621  114,139      176      249      100

  Occupied.............. 102,202  100,984      182      258       88
    Owner occupied......  67,143   66,041      179      252       58
    Renter occupied.....  35,059   34,943      147      207       30

  Vacant................  13,419   13,155       97      137       12
    Year-round vacant...  10,114    9,946       85      120        9
      For rent..........   2,978    3,008       47       67        3
      For sale only.....   1,133    1,082       29       41        1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy     867      834       26       36        1
      Held off market...   5,136    5,022       62       87        4
        For occasional u   1,818    1,709       37       52        2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence      885      852       26       36        1
        For other reason   2,433    2,461       43       61        2

    Seasonal vacant.....   3,305    3,209       50       70        3
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03077**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  03077\03077_Certification Statement.PDF Plant certification statement x 03077\03077_Checklist_110910_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03077\03077_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03077\03077_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03077\03077_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03077\03077_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03077\03077_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03077\Supporting Documentation\03077_Attachments Part A Section 5.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


               MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Income             Shares              Per Share
                                                                (Numerator)       (Denominator)            Amount
                                                                -----------       -------------            ------
<S>                                                             <C>              <C>                       <C>

                                                                         FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2002
                                                                         ------------------------------------

Net income applicable to common shareholders                     $   909,706
                                                                 ===========

BASIC EPS
   Income applicable to shareholders                                                     8,512,194           $0.11
                                                                                                             =====
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
   Options                                                                                       -
                                                                                   ---------------
DILUTED EPS
   Income applicable to shareholders                                                     8,512,194           $0.11
                                                                                   ===============           =====


                                                                         FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2001
                                                                         ------------------------------------

Net income applicable to common shareholders                     $   153,374
                                                                 ===========

BASIC EPS
   Income applicable to shareholders                                                     8,512,161           $0.02
                                                                                                             =====
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
   Options                                                                                   5,700
                                                                                   ---------------
DILUTED EPS
   Income applicable to shareholders                                                     8,517,861           $0.02
                                                                                   ===============           =====
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.





|    |                              
|--- | -----------------------------
|/s/ | Cheryl W. Grisé              
|    | (Signature)                  
|    | Cheryl W. Grisé              
|    | Chief Executive Officer      
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)





|    |                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ | David R. McHale                                  
|    | (Signature)                                      
|    | David R. McHale                                  
|    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Date:  March 7, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
William J. Gervais, Chief Executive Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(1)           the
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
780(d)); and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
October 28, 2008







/s/  WILLIAM J.
      GERVAISWilliam
      J. Gervais,Principal
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                        AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                                               March 31,
                                                                           2000          1999
                                                                           ----          ----
        <S>                                                             <C>            <C>
        Net earnings.............................................       $  240,000     $  173,000
                                                                        ==========     ==========

        Common shares outstanding at beginning of period.........        6,480,194      6,475,069

            Effect of shares issued during the period............               82             --
                                                                        ----------     ----------

        Basic weighted average common shares.....................        6,480,276      6,475,069

        Incremental shares from assumed conversions:

            Stock options........................................              153          2,782
                                                                        ----------     ----------

        Diluted weighted average common shares...................        6,480,429      6,477,851
                                                                        ==========     ==========

            Basic earnings per share.............................        $ 0.04         $ 0.03

            Diluted earnings per share...........................        $ 0.04         $ 0.03
</TABLE>
#### DI-RAN PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. DON GREENE PROVISIONS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-1100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
There was no advance press release this month due to the government furlough.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 51470 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
FRANCISCO ROMERO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 497

- 1

Before BENAVIDES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Francisco Romero appeals his conviction for production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). According to Romero, his conviction violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution because the alleged production of child pornography was purely intrastate and non

economic . In advancing t his argument, Romero acknowledges that this court previously has rejected similar Commerce Clause arguments, see United States

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 6, 2017 Lyl e W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-51470 Document: 00514262920 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2017No. 16

- 51470

2 v. Kallestad , 236 F.3d 225, 22 6

- 31 (5th Cir. 2000) and United States v. D ickson , 632 F.3d 186, 192 (5th Cir. 2011) , but he contend s that this court ’ s prior rulings do not govern here, particularly in light of Bond v. United States , 134 S. Ct. 2077, 2086 (2014) and Nat ’ l Fed ’ n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius , 567 U.S. 519, 550 (2012) ( National Federation ). We review the constitutional challenge de novo

. Kallestad , 236 F.3d at
227. We have held that the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to prohibit local, intrastate production of child pornography where the materials used in the p roduction were moved in interstate commerce

. Dickson , 632 F.3d at 192 ; Kallestad , 236 F.3d at 226

- 31. The Supreme Court ’ s decision in Bond did not abrogate the holdings of these cases. See United States v. McCall , 833 F.3d 560, 564

- 65 (5th Cir. 2016)

. Likewise, under the rule of orderliness, “we are not at liberty to overrule our settled precedent because the Supreme Court ’ s decision in National Federation did not overrule it.” United States v. Alcantar , 733 F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 2013)

. Therefore, we are bound by Kallestad and
Dickson , which render Romero ’ s arguments unavailing. AFFIRMED. Case: 16-51470 Document: 00514262920 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2017
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 175 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 175

  To amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to 
           improve the use of certain registered pesticides.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2013

  Mr. Roberts (for himself, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
 Vitter, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Moran, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Inhofe, and 
 Mr. Boozman) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to 
           improve the use of certain registered pesticides.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF REGISTERED PESTICIDES.

    Section 3(f) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 
Act (7 U.S.C. 136a(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Use of registered pesticides.--Notwithstanding any 
        other law, no permit shall be required for--
                    ``(A) the use of a pesticide that is registered or 
                otherwise authorized for use under this Act, if that 
                use is in accordance with this Act; or
                    ``(B)(i) the use of a biological control organism 
                (as defined in section 403 of the Plant Protection Act 
                (7 U.S.C. 7702)) for the prevention, control, or 
                eradication of a plant pest or noxious weed, if that 
                use is in accordance with that Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et 
                seq.); or
                    ``(ii) the conduct of any other plant pest, noxious 
                weed, or pest control activity under that Act, if that 
                activity is conducted in accordance with that Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Roy R. SELLERS, v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary,

No. 54366.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1974.

In re: Roy R. Sellers applying for Writs of Habeas Corpus and Certiorari.

Writ denied. Insufficient showing to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 8 OF CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,924,121
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    988,284
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,068,661
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       347,616
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  89,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,418,293
<COMMON>                                       257,377
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      438,255
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,309,906
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,045,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,291,811
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 336,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   10,250
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,734,414
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                5,418,293
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    3,307,325
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,943
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,157,869
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,160,812
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        146,513
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (20,506)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 126,007
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       104,663
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,344
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   21,344
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       181,055
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       97,515
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         552,724
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>