alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2303
J. W. CLEMMER, Defendant - Appellant, versus MICHAEL A. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellee, and NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION; DAVID R. GOODE; STEPHEN CRAIG TOBIAS; JON L. MANETTA; DONALD W. MAYBERRY; WILLIAM E. HONEYCUTT; LEWIS D. HALE; TIMOTHY A. HEILIG; C. D. VITTUR; D. D. GRAAB; A. L. LUTTRELL; JERRY R. GRAY; W. F. HENLEY; J. E. PAIR; LANDMARK COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-522-2) Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: April 30, 1999 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.2 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Johnson Webster, Heather Ann Mullen, David Nash Payne, WILLIAMS, KELLY & GREER, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael A. Scott, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant Jerry W. Clemmer appeals from the district court’s order allowing Appellee Michael A. Scott to file an untimely notice of appeal. Because we have decided the underlying appeal on the merits, see Scott v. Norfolk Southern Corp. , No. 98-1098 (4th Cir. Jan. 15, 1999) (unpublished), we dismiss this appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 166 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 166

 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
 River connecting St. Louis, Missouri and southwestern Illinois as the 
                    ``Stan Musial Memorial Bridge''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2013

   Mrs. McCaskill (for herself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Blunt, and Mr. Kirk) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
 River connecting St. Louis, Missouri and southwestern Illinois as the 
                    ``Stan Musial Memorial Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAN MUSIAL MEMORIAL BRIDGE.

    (a) Designation.--The new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the 
Mississippi River that connects St. Louis, Missouri to southwestern 
Illinois shall be known and designated as the ``Stan Musial Memorial 
Bridge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan 
Musial Memorial Bridge''.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTHONY CRUZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-284

[April 25, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-004601-CF-10A.

Anthony Cruz, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Adrian B. DAWSON, III, Petitioner, v. PAPPY’S PIZZA PARLOUR & PUB et al., Respondents.

No. 43130.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 15, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
1

Kordzi, Joe

From: Stevens, William

Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 6:55 PM

To: Kordzi, Joe

Subject: RE: Q on the S&L IPM 5-13 wet FGD cost algorithms

Correct, Joe!

Bill S

From: Kordzi, Joe

Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:23 AM

To: Stevens, William

Subject: Q on the S&L IPM 5‐13 wet FGD cost algorithms  

  

Hi Bill,

  

The documentation states:

  

The evaluation includes a user selected option for a wastewater treatment facility. The

base capital cost includes minor physical and chemical wastewater treatment. However,

in the future more extensive wastewater handling may be required. Although an option

for wastewater treatment is provided, no logic has been developed to accommodate the

additional wastewater treatment costs.

  

Am I correct that although there is a drop down menu for a WWTP option in the first line of the input, there is currently

no implementation for any wastewater treatment in either the capital or O&M costs beyond the default “minor

physical/chemical WWTP?   

  

And the BMWW, FOMWW, and VOMWW are future potential implementations of this more extensive WWTP?

  

So if I were converting these cost algorithms to a spreadsheet, there would be no need to even list wastewater

treatment as an input?   

  

Thanks.

Joe Kordzi

EPA Region 6

" . . . and miles to go before I sleep."

 - Robert Frost
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,541
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                       265
<INVENTORY>                                      3,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,143
<PP&E>                                         135,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,211
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,226
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,920
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    59
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,538
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
        

</TABLE>
#### Benjamin Cornelius JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-580.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 31, 1973.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, Bra-denton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error was made to appear.

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
FROM  THE
STATEMENTS  FOR THE THREE AND NINE  MONTHS  ENDED  MAY  31,  1996
AND AS OF
MAY  31,  1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO
SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000949113
<NAME> LANDMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Aug-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   May-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         693
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  77,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,600
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,484
<PP&E>                                         10,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,816,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,020
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    980
<COMMON>                                       11,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,034,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,816,631
<SALES>                                        331,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               331,740
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  417,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                   38,168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            66,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   66,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>           
               Form 10-Q For The Quarterly Period Ending September 30, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                                 898
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       37,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6,111
<INVENTORY>                                         13,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    47,224
<PP&E>                                              10,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                       4,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      87,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                7,636
<BONDS>                                             64,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                3,940
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                93
<OTHER-SE>                                          11,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        87,543
<SALES>                                             43,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    43,624
<CGS>                                               28,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       28,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    18,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (7,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0   
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (7,131)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.82)
        


</TABLE>
#### Dorothy Elizabeth RILEY, estranged wife of James W. KRUEBBE v. NATIONAL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO. and the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company.

No. 53519.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: National Fire and Marine Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 274 So.2d 832.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
#### Jerry HILL v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50467.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 26, 1978.

Paul Abston, Meridian, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Karen A. Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appel-lee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and SUGG, BROOM, LEE and COFER, JJ., concur. ,
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and
for the period then ended.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|/S/    THOMAS F. FARRELL,
II                                                 
|Thomas F. Farrell, II President and Chief Executive
Officer February 28, 2007



|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|/S/    THOMAS N.
CHEWNING                                                                
|Thomas N. Chewning Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer February 28,
2007
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1726 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1726

       To prevent a taxpayer bailout of health insurance issuers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2013

    Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Lee, Mr. 
    McConnell, Mr. Paul, Mr. Vitter, Mrs. Fischer, and Mr. Hoeven) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To prevent a taxpayer bailout of health insurance issuers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Obamacare Taxpayer Bailout 
Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF BAILOUT OF HEALTH INSURANCE ISSUERS.

    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is amended by 
striking section 1342 (42 U.S.C. 18062).
                                 <all>
```
**I support their efforts to thoroughly study the eff ects on our water supplies. I must also** 

**DEMAND full disclosure of the chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process, as well as**  **supporting the use of RECYCLING the water used in the fracing process.** 

**Respectfully,**

**Steve Kosek Fort Worth** 

YOUR HEALTH AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION Steve Kosek
to: Nick Parsons 08/01/2010 06:08 PM Show Details Page 1 of 1

8/9/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Set tings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web6596.h

...
# etab6
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Fourth Quarter 2000



                                    Rental vacancy rates


                          Fourth       Fourth      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           2000         1999       2000 rate   difference


United States..........         7.8          7.9          0.2          0.3

  Inside MAs...........         7.5          7.7          0.2          0.3
    In central cities..         7.9          8.2          0.3          0.4
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         7.1          7.1          0.3          0.4
  Outside MAs..........         9.5          9.6          0.5          0.7

 Northeast.............         5.3          5.3          0.4          0.5
 Midwest...............         8.7          9.0          0.5          0.7
 South.................        10.8         10.2          0.4          0.5
 West..................         5.3          6.1          0.3          0.4



                                    Homeowner vacancy rates


                          Fourth       Fourth      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           2000         1999       2000 rate   difference


United States..........         1.6          1.6          0.1          0.1

  Inside MAs...........         1.5          1.5          0.1          0.1
    In central cities..         1.9          1.8          0.1          0.2
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         1.3          1.4          0.1          0.1
  Outside MAs..........         2.1          2.0          0.1          0.2

 Northeast.............         1.2          1.5          0.1          0.2
 Midwest...............         1.3          1.0          0.1          0.1
 South.................         2.2          2.0          0.1          0.1
 West..................         1.4          1.8          0.1          0.2
Document

Exhibit 10.9

FIFTH AMENDMENT
TO
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY SEVERANCE PAY PLAN
WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company sponsors The Coca-Cola Company Severance Pay Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2020 and as further amended (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) may amend the Plan at any time; and
WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan to reflect the addition of a new participating affiliate.
NOW, THEREFORE, Appendix A of the Plan is amended, effective August 15, 2022, by adding an entity at the end thereof to read as follows: 


			
	“Red Tree Beverages, LLC”




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this Fifth Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized member as of this 9th day of August 2022.


									
			THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
BENEFITS COMMITTEE

			By:    /s/ Silvina Kippke_________________
       Silvina Kippke
#### Ira A. STEPHENSON, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-85.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 12, 1973.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, ■Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J, Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

*589PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
No. 11282.

#### The Herman Lininger Mfg. Co. *v.*The First National Bank of Crestline.

Decided November 16, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Crawford county..

*Messrs. Finley & Gallinger*and *Messrs. Wickham &*Feighner, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. R. U. Miller; Air. P. W. Poole*and *Mr. R. V. Sears,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.
Sensurion, Inc.

6300 – 34

th Ave. South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450

Sensurion, Inc., d.b.a. Sensurion Aerospace

6400 34th Avenue, South

Minneapolis, MN 55450

david.strohm@sensurion.com

February 25, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Request to amend and allow Sensurion Inc., d.b.a Sensurion Aerospace to utilize 

additional sUAS platforms under the same direction as provided within exemption #13522, 

docket # FAA-2015-3542, approved November 5, 2015.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Sensurion Inc. (d.b.a. Sensurion Aerospace) was issued an exemption under Section 333 of the 

“FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2013” (the Reform Act) numbered 13522 (the 

Exemption) for the purpose of conducting sUAS operations in the market research, aerial survey 

and mapping and inspection industries. Sensurion Inc., hereby requests an amendment to the 

Exemption to allow an additional type of “multi-rotor” unmanned aircraft (UAS) to be operated 

in full compliance set forth within the Exemption.

Sensurion Inc., requests permission to operate the following sUAS based on their type, size, 

weight and speed under the same parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations 

identified within the Operator’s Manual and Maintenance Manual.

 Model Type Size Weight Speed

 MP-4 Multi-rotor 39” O.D. 5# 12oz. < 25 mph

 (with sensor)

 MP-4T Multi-rotor 39” O.D. 5# 3oz. N/A (tethered) 

 (with sensor)
Sensurion, Inc.

6300 – 34

th Ave. South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450