SOURCE AND ACCURACY OF ESTIMATES

Changes in 2013

In the second quarter 2013, historical housing inventory estimates were revised based on 

the latest series of independent housing controls, the vintage 2012 independent housing estimates 

issued by Population Division. This includes the housing inventory time-series data from 2010 

through the first quarter 2013. The vintage 2012 estimates are benchmarked to the 2010 Census. 

The same general procedure will be followed each year in revising housing inventory estimates 

with the most up-to-date independent housing estimates available. 

For an explanation of the methodology used in producing the housing inventory 

independent estimates, please see: http://www.census.gov/popest/methodology/

Note: This time series is by the latest “vintage year.” For example, vintage 2012 means that all of 

the estimates in this time series are identified as belonging to "vintage 2012." The 2010 data are 

from the 2012 vintage, the 2011 data are from the 2012 vintage, and so on.

Changes in 2012

In the second quarter 2012, historical housing inventory estimates were revised based on 

the latest series of independent housing controls, the vintage 2011 independent housing estimates 

issued by Population Division. This includes the housing inventory time-series data from 2010 

through the first quarter 2012. The vintage 2011 estimates are benchmarked to the 2010 Census. 

The same general procedure will be followed each year in revising housing inventory estimates 

with the most up-to-date independent housing estimates available. 

Beginning in the first quarter 2012, the population controls reflect the results of the 2010 

decennial census. This change has virtually no effect on vacancy and homeownership rates, as 

described below. 

Research has shown that the new 2010-based controls increased the rental vacancy rate in 

April 2010 from 10.43 percent to 10.45 percent---a difference of less than 1/10 of one percent. 

The homeowner vacancy rate remained the same at 2.63 percent, while the homeownership rate 

was up from 66.67 percent to 66.74 percent.

Changes in 2011

In the third quarter 2011, historical housing inventory estimates were revised based on 

the latest series of independent housing controls, the vintage 2010 independent housing estimates 

issued by Population Division. This includes the housing inventory time-series data from 2000 

through the second quarter 2011. The Vintage 2010 estimates are benchmarked to the 2010

Census. The same general procedure will be followed each year in revising housing inventory 

estimates with the most up-to-date independent housing estimates available. 

Changes in 2010
In the third quarter 2010, historical housing inventory estimates were revised based on 

the latest series of independent housing controls, the vintage 2009 independent housing estimates 

issued by Population Division. The vintage 2009 estimates are benchmarked to the 2000 Census. 

Changes in 2007

In first quarter 2007, the CPS/HVS began using Blaise, a powerful computer-assisted 

interviewing (CAI) system and survey processing tool for the Windows operating system. It is

being used for many of the surveys conducted by the Census Bureau. 

Methodology Changes in 2003

Population controls that reflect the results of the 2000 decennial census were used in the 

CPS/HVS estimation process for the first time in the first quarter 2003. This change had a slight 

effect on vacancy and homeownership rates, as described below. As a final additional step in the 

estimation process, the estimates were controlled to independent housing counts used for the first 

time in order to produce a more accurate estimate of housing units. This makes the CPS/HVS 

estimates of housing units more consistent with other Census Bureau housing surveys. The new 

housing controls affected the count of all housing units in the sense that both occupied and 

vacant units were ratio estimated to the new control total. Vacancy rates and homeownership 

rates were not affected by this change.

The CPS/HVS began computing first-stage factors (used for weighting purposes) based 

on year-round and seasonal counts of housing units from the 2000 decennial census in the first 

quarter 2003. From 1980 to 2002, the CPS/HVS first-stage factors were based on year-round 

estimates only. We believe that this improves our counts of year-round and seasonal units. 

The shift from 1990-based to 2000-based population controls (including the weighting 

revision) had a very slight effect on vacancy rates and homeownership rates. Research has shown 

that the new 2000-based controls dropped the rental vacancy rate in the first quarter 2002 from 

9.14 percent to 9.08 percent---a difference of less than 1/10 of one percent. The homeowner 

vacancy rate was revised from 1.67 percent to 1.65 percent, while the homeownership rate was 

revised from 67.82 percent to 67.81 percent. 

The questions on race on the CPS were modified beginning in the first quarter 2003 to 

comply with the revised standards for federal statistical agencies. Respondents may now select 

more than one race. The Hispanic/Nonhispanic origin question continues to be asked separately.

INTRODUCTION OF COMPUTER ASSISTED SURVEY COLLECTION (CASIC) AND 

REWEIGHTING CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY/HOUSING VACANCY SURVEY 

(CPS/HVS)–BASED ON THE 1990 CENSUS

Major changes related to the Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey 

(CPS/HVS) were effective beginning with the first quarter 1994 data. First, a new weighting 

procedure was implemented based on the 1990 decennial census. The 1990-based weighting 

produces, on average, estimates of the total housing inventory that were about 0.1 percent lower 

than the 1980-based weighting. Generally, the vacancy rates were only minimally affected, 

while the homeownership rate was about one-half of a percentage point lower with the new 

weighting procedures. 
A second change was that the CPS/HVS became a totally computerized survey with the 

implementation of the Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection (CASIC). The CASIC 

tools consist of state-of-the-art computer-assisted modules for data collection and processing. 

Although the concepts, definitions, and questionnaire items remain the same, the shift to CASIC 

may affect vacancy rates and homeownership rates. We were unable to determine the 

quantitative effects of the use of CASIC on the vacancy and homeownership rates. Data users 

should use caution when comparing data for 1994 and later with earlier data.

Beginning the second quarter of 1999, a change was made in the way data for housing 

units in structure were collected. In the past, there was one category to show 1-unit in structure. 

That has been broken into two categories: 1-unit attached and 1-unit detached.

SOURCE OF DATA 

The estimates presented in this report were based on data obtained from two surveys 

conducted by the Bureau of the Census. Data concerning vacancy rates and tenure of occupied 

housing units were from the monthly sample of the Current Population Survey (CPS). 

Characteristics of occupied housing units in table 3 were from the American Housing Survey 

(AHS). 

CPS AND AHS DESIGNS 

Since the inception of the CPS in 1940, the sample has been redesigned several times to 

upgrade the quality and reliability of the data and to meet changing data needs. From July 1995 

to March 2004, the CPS/HVS sample was selected from a frame based on the 1990 decennial 

census and was spread over 754 sample areas, which represent 2,007 geographic areas in the 

United States. Beginning in April 2004, the new sample drawn from Census 2000 was phased in 

over a 15-month period. From April 2004 to June 2005, the sample consisted of sample units 

drawn from both the 1990 and 2000 decennial censuses. Beginning in July 2005, the sample 

consists only of housing units drawn from Census 2000, along with housing units built after 

April 1, 2000. This sample is spread over 824 sample areas and represents the 2,025 geographic 

areas of the United States that existed at the time of Census 2000.

Beginning in the first quarter 1986, vacant seasonal mobile homes were included in the 

count of vacant seasonal units. This change resulted in a 12 percent increase in the number of 

vacant seasonal housing units. 

Beginning with the first quarter 2002 Housing Vacancy Report, the size of the CPS/HVS 

sample increased to approximately 72,000 housing units. This expansion was one of the Census 

Bureau’s plans to meet the requirements of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program 

(SCHIP) legislation. Of the 72,000 housing units contained in the CPS/HVS sample, 

approximately 61,200 are eligible for interview each month; of this number, 3,900 occupied 

units, on the average, are visited but interviews are not obtained because occupants are not found 

at home after repeated calls or are unavailable for some other reason. In addition to the 61,200, 

there are also about 10,800 sample units in an average month which are visited but are found to 

be vacant or otherwise not to be interviewed. About half of the 10,800 are vacant and 

interviewed for the HVS. 

 
The CPS estimation procedure for occupied units involves the inflation of the weighted 

sample results to independent estimates of the total civilian noninstitutional population of the 

United States by age, race, sex, and Hispanic/non-Hispanic categories. These independent 

estimates were based on statistics from the decennial censuses of population; statistics on births, 

deaths, immigration, and emigration; and statistics on the strength of the Armed Forces.

The HVS estimation procedure for vacant units is similar to that used for occupied units. 

Weighted sample results were adjusted at the state level using 2000 census vacant counts. A 

second adjustment inflated these results based on the CPS coverage of occupied units by 

geographic areas. As a final step for both the CPS and HVS, all housing unit counts were 

adjusted to reflect independent housing control totals. This change was effective, beginning in 

the first quarter 2003.

Data shown in all tables (except table 2) on vacancy rates and tenure of occupied units 

are based on a 12-month average for 2013. The data concerning the distribution of 

characteristics for occupied housing units, shown in table 2, were obtained primarily from the 

AHS national sample. Distributions of characteristics of occupied housing units from the AHS 

estimates were applied to CPS current housing inventory independent estimates to obtain the 

characteristics of occupied housing units used in this report. The Survey of Construction (SOC) 

and the Consumer Price Index also were used to improve estimates of the rent distribution.

 

The 2011 AHS sample was spread over 394 sample areas comprising 878 counties and 

independent cities with coverage in each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. Of the 

177,500 housing units both occupied and vacant contained in the AHS sample, 154,700 were 

interviewed and 22,800 were classified as "Type A noninterviews" for various reasons. 8,900 

units were visited but were not eligible to be interviewed for the purposes of AHS. A detailed 

description of the AHS sample design and estimation procedure can be found in the H-150 report 

for 2011. 

COMPARABILITY WITH CENSUS OF HOUSING DATA 

The most recent research has shown that the CPS/HVS and the 2010 census produced 

significant differences for vacancy characteristics. The rental vacancy rate from the April 2010 

census was 9.2 percent, whereas the CPS/HVS reported the rental vacancy rate of 10.6 percent 

for the first half of 2010. The April 2010 census had a homeowner vacancy rate of 2.4 percent, 

while the CPS/HVS had a vacancy rate of approximately 2.6 percent for the first half of 2010. 

For occupied housing, the April 2010 census produced a homeownership rate of 65.1 percent, 

while for the first half of 2010, the CPS/HVS produced a rate of 67.0 percent. These differences 

illustrate that, for these characteristics as well as others, caution should be used when making 

comparisons between the 2010 census and the CPS/HVS. 

Further research has shown that the CPS/HVS and the 2000 census produced significant 

differences for vacancy characteristics. The rental vacancy rate from the April 2000 census was 

6.8 percent, whereas the CPS/HVS reported the rental vacancy rate of 7.9 percent for the first 

half of 2000. The April 2000 census had a homeowner vacancy rate of 1.7 percent, while the 

CPS/HVS had a vacancy rate of approximately 1.5 percent for the first half of 2000. For 

occupied housing, the April 2000 census produced a homeownership rate of 66.2 percent, while 

for the first half of 2000, the CPS/HVS produced a rate of 67.2 percent. These differences 
illustrate that, for these characteristics as well as others, caution should be used when making 

comparisons between the 2000 census and the CPS/HVS. 

Research has shown that the CPS/HVS and the 1990 census produced significant 

differences for vacancy characteristics. The rental vacancy rate from the April 1990 census was 

8.5 percent, whereas, the CPS/HVS reported the rental vacancy rate of 7.2 percent for the first 

half of 1990. The April 1990 census had a homeowner vacancy rate of 2.1 percent, while the 

CPS/HVS had a vacancy rate of approximately 1.7 percent for the first half of 1990. For 

occupied housing, the April 1990 census produced a homeownership rate of 64.2 percent, while 

for the first half of 1990 the CPS/HVS produced a rate of 63.9 percent. These differences 

illustrate that, for these characteristics as well as others, caution should be used when making 

comparisons between the 1990 census and the CPS/HVS. 

Most of the concepts and definitions were the same for items that appear in 1980, 1990, 

2000 and 2010 censuses and the Housing Vacancy Survey. However, there was one minor 

difference in the housing unit definition between the CPS/HVS and the 1980 and 1990 decennial 

censuses. The difference was that, in the CPS/HVS prior to 1983, living arrangements containing 

five or more persons, not related to the person in charge, were classified as group quarters; for 

the 1980 and 1990 census, the requirement was raised to nine or more persons not related to the 

person in charge. For Census 2000, the conversion requirement was eliminated. There were some 

differences in what has been counted as housing units between the earlier censuses and the 

CPS/HVS. Descriptions of the differences between earlier censuses and the HVS appear in the 

1985 and earlier reports of this series.

Prior to the first quarter 1990, there were significant differences between the CPS/HVS 

and the decennial censuses. The 1980 and 1990 decennial censuses included vacant mobile 

homes as housing units, whereas prior to 1986 the CPS/HVS did not. However, beginning in the 

first quarter 1986, vacant seasonal mobile homes were counted as housing units in the CPS/HVS. 

In addition, year-round vacant mobile homes were counted as housing units, beginning in the 

first quarter 1990 in the CPS/HVS. Another difference in the housing unit definition between the 

CPS/HVS (prior to 1986) and the 1980 and 1990 censuses was that the CPS/HVS required units 

to be separate living quarters and have direct access or have complete kitchen facilities. For the 

1980 and 1990 decennial censuses, the complete kitchen facilities alternative was dropped with 

direct access required of all units. However, beginning in 1990, the CPS/HVS requirement for 

complete kitchen facilities was dropped with direct access required of all units. Thus, the earlier 

definitional differences were eliminated. 

In addition, there are differences between the methodologies used to collect data for the 

CPS/HVS and the censuses. These differences include interviewing procedures, staff experience 

and training; differences in processing procedures and sample designs; the sampling variability 

associated with the CPS/HVS and the sample data from the census; and the non-sampling errors 

associated with the CPS/HVS and census data. 

COMPARABILITY WITH EARLIER DATA 

As stated earlier in this report, beginning with the first quarter 1994 new weighting 

procedures based on the 1990 decennial census were implemented. In addition, the survey data 

collection procedures became totally computerized. Caution should be used when comparing 

current data with unrevised data prior to 1994.
In the fourth quarter 1989, new edit procedures were implemented in the Current 

Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey (CPS/HVS). These new procedures were used to 

allocate cases that would have been classified as "not reported" under previous procedures.

 

In the first quarter 1990, year-round vacant mobile homes were included for the first time 

as part of the year-round vacant count of housing units. This change was made to make the 

composition of the housing unit inventory for the CPS/HVS similar to the decennial census and 

other surveys, which count all mobile homes as housing units when occupied or vacant 

(available for occupancy on the site). Research has shown that the inclusion of vacant mobile 

homes increased the vacancy rate significantly in some cases. We have revised 1989 data in this 

report to reflect all changes. Caution should be used when comparing data from 1990 or later 

with unrevised data prior to 1990.

In addition to the design and estimation changes mentioned in the previous section, 

caution should be used in comparing data for 1980 and beyond in this report with data from 1979 

and earlier years. Starting with the first quarter 1980, several changes were implemented in the 

survey to improve the reliability of the data presented. These included adding a supplemental 

sample, refining the estimation procedures, and changing the source of occupied characteristics 

from the Quarterly Housing Survey to the AHS.

Although the above mentioned changes resulted in more reliable estimates, data for 1980 

and later in this report are not completely comparable to data for the fourth quarter 1979 and 

previous quarters, as published in Housing Vacancies reports, series H-111, Nos. 1 to 79-Q4. 

Furthermore, unrevised data prior to 1990 were not completely comparable to 1990 data and 

beyond, due to the inclusion of year-round vacant mobile homes, beginning in the first quarter 

1990. Thus, particular caution should be observed in drawing conclusions about trends that 

extend from before 1980 to 1980 and beyond, and also trends from before 1990 to 1990 and 

later. For comparative purposes, 1979 data in this report were revised to incorporate all changes 

made in 1980, and 1989 data were revised to incorporate all changes made in 1990. Unrevised 

1989 and 1979 data are provided to show the magnitude of the various changes. 

VACANCY RATES FOR CHARACTERISTICS IN TABLE 2

Vacancy rates in table 2 are based in part on forecasts of occupied housing units. These 

forecasts are periodically revised to incorporate more recent data and improved forecasting 

procedures. Data shown on table 2 for 2013 and 2012 are based on the 2011 AHS.

For the occupied unit forecasts for the monthly rent categories, we update the AHS data 

quarterly to reflect the rise in the cost of renting through the use of the residential rent index, and 

the latest available asking rent data for newly constructed rental units. 

CAUTION IN USING SEASONAL VACANT DATA 

Analysis of seasonal vacant data prior to the first quarter 1987 has shown that estimates 

for these characteristics have been underestimated by approximately 28 percent. The estimates 

beginning with the first quarter 1987 were adjusted to reflect this. This revision had an effect on 

other categories (especially the percentage occupied) in addition to seasonal vacant units in the 

distributions shown in tables 7.
ACCURACY OF THE ESTIMATES 

Since the CPS/HVS estimates are based on a sample, they may differ somewhat from the 

figures that would have been obtained if a complete census had been taken using the same 

questionnaires, instructions, and enumerators. There are two types of errors possible in an 

estimate based on a sample survey: sampling and non-sampling. The accuracy of a survey result 

depends on both types of errors, but the full extent of the non-sampling error is unknown. 

Consequently, particular care should be exercised in the interpretation of figures based on a 

relatively small number of cases or on small differences between estimates. The standard errors 

provided for the CPS/HVS estimates primarily indicate the magnitude of the sampling error. 

They also partially measure the effect of some non-sampling errors in responses and 

enumeration; but do not measure any systematic biases in the data. (Bias is the difference 

averaged over all possible samples, between the estimate and the desired value). Approximately 

2 percent of the CPS/HVS households are selected for quality control reinterview each month 

based on the previous month’s outcome.

NON-SAMPLING VARIABILITY 

Nonsampling errors can be attributed to many sources, e.g., inability to obtain 

information about all cases in the sample, definitional difficulties, differences in the 

interpretation of questions, inability or unwillingness on the part of respondents to provide 

correct information, inability to recall information, errors made in collection such as recording or 

coding the data, errors made in processing the data, errors made in estimating values for missing 

data, and failure to represent all units with the sample (undercoverage). Undercoverage in the 

CPS/HVS results from missed housing units and misclassifying housing units. Ratio estimation 

to independent controls, as described previously, partially corrects for the bias due to survey 

undercoverage. However, biases exist in the estimates to the extent that missed households have 

different characteristics than interviewed households. While highly unusual, HVS interviews 

may not always be complete. In the case of missing information, the data will be allocated. An 

HVS interview is not considered a Type B Noninterview unless the question “Is this interview by 

observation only?” is answered. 

SAMPLING VARIABILITY 

The standard errors shown in the tables are primarily measures of sampling variability, 

that is, of the variations that occurred by chance because a sample rather than the entire 

population was surveyed. The sample estimate and its standard error enable one to construct 

confidence intervals; ranges that would include the average results of all possible samples with a 

known probability. For example, if all possible samples were selected, each of these being 

surveyed under essentially the same general conditions and using the same sample design, and if 

an estimate and its standard error were calculated from each sample, then approximately 90-

percent of the intervals from 1.645 standard errors below the estimate to 1.645 standard errors 

above the estimate would include the average result of all possible samples.

The average estimate derived from all possible samples is or is not contained in any 

particular computed interval. However, for a particular sample, one can say with specified 

confidence that the average estimate derived from all possible samples is included in the 

confidence interval. 
Standard errors may also be used to perform hypothesis testing, a procedure for 

distinguishing between population parameters using sample estimates. The most common types 

of hypotheses appearing in this report are: (1) the population parameters are identical, and, (2) 

the population parameters are different. An example of this would be comparing the vacancy 

rate in MAs versus the vacancy rate outside MAs. Tests may be performed at various levels of 

significance, where a level of significance is the probability of concluding that the characteristics 

are different when, in fact, they are identical.

To perform the most common test, let x and y be sample estimates for two characteristics 

of interest. Let the standard error on the difference x-y be SEDIFF. If the ratio R = (xy)/SEDIFF is between -1.645 and +1.645, no conclusion about the difference between the 

characteristics is justified at the 0.10 level of significance. If, on the other hand, this ratio is 

smaller than -1.645 or larger than +1.645, the observed difference is significant at the 0.10 level. 

In this event, it is a commonly accepted practice to say that the characteristics are different. Of 

course, sometimes this conclusion will be wrong. When the characteristics are, in fact, the same, 

there is a 10 percent chance of concluding that they are different. All statements of comparison 

in the text have passed a hypothesis test at the 0.10 level of significance or better. This means 

that, for most differences cited in the text, the absolute value of the estimated difference between 

characteristics is greater than or equal to 1.645 times the estimated standard error of the 

difference. 

Comparisons of characteristics of the vacancies for the first quarter 1990, (which include 

year-round vacant mobile homes as part of the year-round vacant housing inventory for the first 

time) with previous unrevised quarters revealed significant differences in some cases. Thus,

caution should be used when comparing current data with unrevised data prior to 1990.

ILLUSTRATION OF THE USE OF TABLES OF STANDARD ERRORS 

The sample estimate and its standard error enable one to construct a confidence interval. 

A confidence interval is a measure of an estimate’s variability. The larger a confidence interval is 

in relation to the size of the estimate, the less reliable the estimate. For example, the estimated 

percent of all housing units vacant and available for rent is 2.8 percent (Table 9) and the standard 

error on the estimate is 0.1 percentage points (Table B-1). Then the 90-percent confidence 

interval is calculated as 2.8 percent ± (1.645 x 0.1), or 2.8 percent ± 0.2, or from 2.6 percent to 

3.0 percent. If all possible samples were surveyed under essentially the same general conditions 

and the same sample design, and if an estimate and its standard error were calculated from each 

sample, then approximately 90 percent of the intervals from 1.645 standard errors below the 

estimate to1.645 standard errors above the estimate would include the average result of all 

possible samples.

Standard errors are also used to perform hypothesis testing--a procedure for 

distinguishing between population parameters (whose values are not known) using sample 

estimates. The most common type of hypothesis is that two population parameters are different. 

These tests may be performed at various significance levels. The significance level is the 

probability of concluding that the parameters are different when, in fact, they are the same. For 

example, to conclude that two parameters are different at the 0.10 level of significance, the 

absolute value of the difference between their corresponding sample estimates must be greater 

than or equal to1.645 times the estimated standard error of the difference.
The Census Bureau uses 90-percent confidence intervals and 0.10 levels of significance 

to determine statistical validity. The 90-percent confidence intervals are shown in the text or in 

the tables for selected items. The standard errors for other figures in this report are given in the 

tables. In addition to sampling error, the figures in this report, both the estimates and their 

standard errors, are also subject to rounding error.