alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1591 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the work opportunity 

credit to small businesses which hire individuals who are members of 

the Ready Reserve or National Guard, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2013 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

work opportunity credit to small businesses which hire 

individuals who are members of the Ready Reserve or 

National Guard, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire A Hero Act of 

5 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1591 IS

1 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO SMALL BUSI2 NESSES FOR HIRING MEMBERS OF READY 

3 RESERVE OR NATIONAL GUARD. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (H), by striking the pe7 riod at the end of subparagraph (I) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, 

8 and by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(J) in the case of an eligible employer (as 

10 defined in section 408(p)(2)(C)(i)), an indi11 vidual who is a member of— 

12 ‘‘(i) the Ready Reserve (as described 

13 in section 10142 of title 10, United States 

14 Code), or 

15 ‘‘(ii) the National Guard (as defined 

16 in section 101(c)(1) of such title 10).’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to wages paid or incurred 

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act in tax21 able years ending after such date. 

22 (2) CURRENT EMPLOYEES COVERED BY CRED23 IT.—For purposes of applying section 51 of the In24 ternal Revenue Code of 1986, individuals described 

25 in section 51(d)(1)(J) of such Code, as added by 

26 this section, who are employed by an eligible emVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:05 Oct 29, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1591.IS S1591

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1591 IS

1 ployer (as defined in section 408(p)(2)(C)(i) of such 

2 Code) on the date of the enactment of this Act shall 

3 be treated as beginning work for such employer on 

4 such date. 

5 SEC. 3. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY 

6 CREDIT FOR EMPLOYERS HIRING QUALIFIED 

7 VETERANS AND MEMBERS OF READY RE8 SERVE AND NATIONAL GUARD. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(c)(4) of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(other 

11 than any individual described in subparagraph (B) or (J) 

12 of subsection (d)(1))’’ after ‘‘individual’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

15 the employer after December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Benjamin SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-517.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 2018

On the 28th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), we celebrate this historic legislation, which echoed our Nation's founding promise to recognize and secure the equal rights of all men and women. Today, we reaffirm our commitment to cultivate further opportunities for all Americans to live full and independent lives, and recognize the many contributions enabled by expanded participation of Americans with disabilities in our society.

President George H.W. Bush signed the ADA into law on July 26, 1990. It has transformed the lives of millions of Americans living with disabilities by promoting their equal access to employment, government services, public accommodations, commercial facilities, and public transportation. Today, people of all ages with disabilities are better able to thrive in the community, pursue careers, contribute to our economy, and fully participate in American society.

Our Nation must continue to build upon this foundation and continue to further the participation of the more than 56 million Americans living with disabilities. My Administration continues to encourage research that will lead to advancements in technology, medicine, and other fields and better enable independent living. We are also expanding and promoting equal education and employment opportunities for Americans with disabilities to live and work. In this regard, in June of last year, I signed an Executive Order to develop more apprenticeship programs for all people, including those with disabilities. Additional training will encourage better involvement from businesses and allow people with disabilities to contribute meaningfully to a wide variety of industries.

As we commemorate the anniversary of the ADA, we recommit ourselves to fostering an environment in which all Americans have the opportunity to pursue the American Dream.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim July 26, 2018, as a day in celebration of the 28th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities that celebrate the contributions of Americans with disabilities and to renew our commitment to achieving the promise of our freedom for all Americans.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fifth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-third.

[FR Doc. 2018-16429

Billing code 3295-F8-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,738,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,581,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (772,974)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,585,081
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,398,549
<PP&E>                                       2,580,751
<DEPRECIATION>                               (946,600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,534,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,998,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,758,119
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,534,046
<SALES>                                     28,741,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,741,404
<CGS>                                       17,476,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,476,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,401,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                76,645
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (190,982)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,921,634
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (590,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,331,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,331,034
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, David H. Roche, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:


a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


c)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and


5.
        The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors:


a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.






Date:
        November 27, 2006
        
        
        /s/   David H. RochePresident and Chief Executive Officer


---
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 16, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________
No. 3D21

- 319 Lower Tribunal No s

. 20

- 273 AP, 11

- 27644 SP

________________



### United Automobile Insurance Company

, etc., Appellant,

vs.


### Best American Diagnostic Center, I nc ., a/a/o Jorge L. Fernandez

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the C ounty Court for Miami

- Dade County, Ayana Harris , Judge.

Michael J

. Neimand , for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A.

, and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines) ; and Marks & Fleischer, P.A. , and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale) , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON

, and LOBREE , JJ.

PER CURIAM.2 We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United

Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC , 47 Fla. L. Weekly

D175 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (“Millennium’s ‘identity’ is not the same

in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity

from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral

estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).

Reversed and re manded.
#### Robert D. MOLDORAH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 66-335.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 10, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1967.

Leonard R. Mellon, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Barry N. Semet, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., SWANN, J.,. and KANNER, A. O., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Freed v. State, 100 Fla. 900, 130 So. 459 (1930); Knight v. State, 94 Fla. 868, 114 So. 665 (1927).
EXHIBIT 10.9

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
                DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN OF THE BERKSHIRE BANK


         WHEREAS,  The Berkshire Bank (the "Bank" or the "Company") sponsors and
maintains the Deferred Compensation Plan of The
Berkshire Bank (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS,  the Bank  deems it  appropriate  to amend the Plan to provide
matching  contributions  by the  Bank  of up to 3% of  the  annual  salary  of a
participant  in the plan,  and to allow the President the  flexibility of adding
employees  to the plan not just based on annual  salary but also on  performance
and other criteria; and

         WHEREAS,  Article VII of the Plan reserves to the Board of Directors of
the Bank the right to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time.

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  the Plan is hereby amended,  effective as of November
29, 2007, as follows:

                                      FIRST

         The second sentence of Section 2.10 of the Plan shall be amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

"The  President  of the  Company  may  select  Employees  who  are  eligible  to
participate in this Plan based on any additional  criteria or alternative policy
established  by the  President,  including an  alternative  policy that does not
require an Employee to have an annual rate of Compensation at least equal to the
amount specified in the foregoing sentence."

                                     SECOND

         The first  sentence  of Section 3.3 of the Plan shall be amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

"The  Company  may, in its sole  discretion,  credit  additional  amounts to the
Deferred  Compensation Account of a Participant from time to time, including any
matching  contributions  based on a  Participant's  salary  deferrals made under
Section 3.1 of the Plan."

                                      THIRD

         Except as  amended  herein,  the Plan  shall  remain in full  force and
effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned being duly authorize,  has executed
this Amendment as evidence of its adoption.

                                           THE BERKSHIRE BANK


November 29, 2007                  Name:         /s/ David Lukens
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 David Lukens
                                                 Executive Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JARVIS JILES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1849 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 8, 2019 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Neil A. Roddenberry, Judge. Jarvis Jiles, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
#### RAKOFF v. WORLD INSURANCE CO.

No. 36042.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 191 So.2d 476.
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2010-0040 Directorate Identifier: 2008NM203AD 90-25-013,13 -12/19/01

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained inthe Supplemental AD Docket MAY BEVIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 LindAve. Sw., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9a.m. and 3p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Dale: 03J05f2008
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002George W. Hamlin, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer and Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, of Canandaigua National Corporation (the Company), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Company.The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.February 11, 2010/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV/s/ Lawrence A. HeilbronnerGeorge W. Hamlin, IVLawrence A. HeilbronnerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1

<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                  271,863
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         7,844,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         (3,249,847)
<INVENTORY>                                                           1,764,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      6,818,960
<PP&E>                                                                1,103,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         (798,568)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        7,385,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 3,608,209
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                              9,134,234
<OTHER-SE>                                                           (5,474,593)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          7,385,621
<SALES>                                                               4,307,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      4,307,666
<CGS>                                                                 1,900,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         1,900,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      2,371,922
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        7,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          27,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              2,821
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      24,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             24,181
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               .00


</TABLE>
254 La. 132

#### COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION v. Carl SHIPP, Jr.

No. 49805.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Louise Stevens Shipp applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Franklin. 220 So.2d 735.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
<Page>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2.2

   Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Joan S. Freilich, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, which this
statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                                      /s/ Joan S. Freilich
                                                      ----------------------
                                                      Joan S. Freilich


Dated: February 27, 2003
EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED ROYALTY TRUST INDENTURE 

OF 
 CROSS TIMBERS ROYALTY
TRUST 
 This Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Royalty Trust Indenture (this
“Amendment”) of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the “Trust”), is made and entered into effective as of October 13, 2022, by the undersigned Trustee of the Trust (the
“Trustee”), after receiving court approval of the Amendment. 
 W I T N E S
S E T H : 
 WHEREAS, on October 13, 2022, the District Court of Tarrant County, Texas,
153rd Judicial District (the “Court”) approved an order modifying that certain Amended and Restated Royalty Trust Indenture of the Trust dated as of February 12, 1991 (the “Indenture”) with
respect to the requirements to serve as successor trustee; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Trustee desires to amend the Trust
Agreement to reflect the amendment ordered by the Court, which amends and restates the third sentence of Article VI, Section 6.05 as follows: 

“Any such successor trustee shall be a bank or trust company having a capital, surplus and undivided profits (as of the
end of its last fiscal year prior to its appointment) of at least $20,000,000.” 
 [Signature Page Follows] 

  
 1 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee has executed this Amendment as of the day
and year first above written. 
  

			
	TRUSTEE:
	
	SIMMONS BANK
		
	By:	 	/s/RON HOOPER
	Name: Ron Hooper
	Title: Senior Vice President



  
 Signature Page to 

Amendment No. 1 to 
 Amended
and Restated Royalty Trust Indenture
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0289

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

C.K.,

 A Youth in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Elizabeth Best, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 15 2021

12/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0289