alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN EXHIBIT 99 OF CONSOLIDATED
NATURAL GAS COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,054,656
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,168,147
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,453,641
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       413,350
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 223,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,313,694
<COMMON>                                       262,964
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      526,475
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,539,587
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,358,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,552,890
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 238,700
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  154,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,039,078
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,313,694
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    5,710,020
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           147,053
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   5,164,834
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   5,311,887
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        398,133
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              13,516
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 411,649
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       107,269
<NET-INCOME>                                   304,380
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  304,380
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       184,942
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      121,682
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         742,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.15
        

</TABLE>
1

From: Hulse, David G. [David.Hulse@alcoa.com]

Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 4:53 PM

To: Boyd.Rochelle@EPA.gov

Subject: Revised Files for Alcoa Inc. - Wenatchee Works

Attachments: CategoryHAPs_NEI42328.xls; Aluminum Co of America Wenatchee Works_NEI42328.kmz; 

ReleasePoint_NEI42328.xls

Attached, please find the revised kmz, ReleasePoint, and CategoryHAPs files for the Alcoa Inc. – Wenatchee 

Works facility (NEI42328).

<<CategoryHAPs_NEI42328.xls>> <<Aluminum Co of America Wenatchee Works_NEI42328.kmz>> 

<<ReleasePoint_NEI42328.xls>> 

The kmz file includes both the emission points and the property boundary.

We used the fugitive (area) source approach to represent the Potline Roof Vents and the Anode Bake Oven 

Roof Vents. Where we believe that the point should be deleted, the cell is shaded red. The cells not shaded in 

red matched MACT emissions sources and the coordinates were confirmed. 

Please contact me if you have any questions.

David Hulse
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  



           First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

2001.....    67.5     67.7     68.1     68.0
2000.....    67.1     67.2     67.7     67.5

1999.....    66.7     66.6     67.0     66.9
1998.....    65.9     66.0     66.8     66.4
1997.....    65.4     65.7     66.0     65.7
1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2
1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4

\r Revised.
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  Second Quarter 2002r and 2003




                                    Second     Second     Standard    Standard
Area                                quarter    quarter    error on    error on
                                     2002r      2003     2003 rate  difference

United States.....................      67.6       68.0        0.2         0.2

  Inside MAs......................      65.8       66.2        0.2         0.2
   In central cities..............      51.4       52.0        0.3         0.4
   Not in central cities (suburbs)      74.4       74.6        0.2         0.3
  Outside MAs.....................      74.9       75.9        0.3         0.4

 Northeast........................      63.8       64.2        0.4         0.5
 Midwest..........................      72.8       72.8        0.3         0.4
 South............................      69.3       69.9        0.2         0.4
 West.............................      62.4       63.2        0.3         0.5
       rRevised
251 La. 749

#### Wallace LeBLANC et al. v. Warren J. BROU et al.

No. 49057.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 2, 1968.

In re: Wallace LeBlanc and Olivia B. LeBlanc applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Ascension. 205 So.2d 141.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, the judgment complained of is correct.
**EXHIBIT 23****Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants**To the Board of Directors     Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.     As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report datedJune 3, 2005, except as to Notes 6 and 10 which is July 6, 2005, relating to the financialstatements of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd., which report appears in the Amendment to theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 30, 2005 of Professional VeterinaryProducts, Ltd.        July 28, 2005 /s/ Quick & McFarlin, P.C.   Quick & McFarlin, P.C.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-10603

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ryan Michael Anderson, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:21-CR-30-1

______________________________

Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ryan Michael Anderson has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Anderson has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 3, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10603 Document: 00516633916 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/03/2023
No. 22-10603

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10603 Document: 00516633916 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/03/2023
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                             289,412
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,385,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                   30,139,154)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,741,187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,276,803
<PP&E>                                          11,924,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,085,411)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,804,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,761,852
<BONDS>                                         11,131,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         14,696
<COMMON>                                           488,879
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,732,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,804,092
<SALES>                                         63,609,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,140,592
<CGS>                                           41,066,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,541,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,098,743
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,780,025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,043,756
<INCOME-TAX>                                       792,316
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,251,440
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,251,440
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.02


</TABLE>
Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up). our) Products 

Inspection 1.0 300 

Removal 1.0 60 

' " .. ·• 

' 

' 

' 

" ' 

' 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $30,600 

Costs covered under warranty (ffknown) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and close- up) 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
g

y 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* 0 NO [2J 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No 

YES 0 NO [2J 

Explanation: This AD is not considered to be "significant" 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ·-

YES* 0 NO [2J 

*Explanation:
August 3 , 2015

Mr. Aaron Reedy

EvoI magery, LLC

127 West Main

Lexington, KY 40507

Dear Mr. Reedy :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It ex plains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your M ay 4 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1611 ), but

we are unable to process your request any f urther. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; t hat is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
J. Second, Boss argues that the district court abused its discretion and usurped the authority of the parole board by imposing the maximum sentence provided by the relevant statutes. Boss does not allege that the statues fixing punishment are unconstitutional, see 

### Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996), and his consecutive terms of 24-60 months for being a felon in possession of a firearm, 48-120 months for burglary, and 24-60 months for eluding a police officer, fall within the parameters authorized by the relevant statutes, see NRS 202.360(1), NRS 205.060(2), NRS 484.348(3)(b). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing. 

### Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987).

Having considered Boss' contentions and concluded that they are without merit, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Gibbons J.

J. Douglas
Saitta cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Washoe County Alternate Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

2
#### Donald SENEVEY and Gladys J. Senevey, his wife, Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SARASOTA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-59.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 18, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanley J. Gadek, Senior Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 

|September 18, 2003 |  | /s/ Stanley J. Gadek                                                                  
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | Stanley J. Gadek Senior Vice President,
Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNION
PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC. CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
POSITION AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE RELATED CONDENSED STATEMENT
OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          27,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               340,200
<PP&E>                                       5,981,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,069,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,367,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          471,500
<BONDS>                                        571,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,484,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,367,100
<SALES>                                      1,264,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,264,700
<CGS>                                          920,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  920,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                304,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    98,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            206,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   206,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Lebanon

On August 1, 2007, by Executive Order 13441, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Lebanon pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions of certain persons to undermine Lebanon's legitimate and democratically elected government or democratic institutions; to contribute to the deliberate breakdown in the rule of law in Lebanon, including through politically motivated violence and intimidation; to reassert Syrian control or contribute to Syrian interference in Lebanon; or to infringe upon or undermine Lebanese sovereignty. Such actions contribute to political and economic instability in that country and the region.

Certain ongoing activities, such as Iran's continuing arms transfers to Hizballah—which include increasingly sophisticated weapons systems—serve to undermine Lebanese sovereignty, contribute to political and economic instability in the region, and continue to constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on August 1, 2007, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond August 1, 2018. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Lebanon declared in Executive Order 13441.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2018-16550

Billing code 3295-F8-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1603 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1603

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust for the benefit 
 of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatami Indians, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF INDIAN TRUST LAND.

    (a) In General.--The land taken into trust by the United States for 
the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians 
and described in the final Notice of Determination of the Department of 
the Interior (70 Fed. Reg. 25596 (May 13, 2005)) is reaffirmed as trust 
land, and the actions of the Secretary of the Interior in taking that 
land into trust are ratified and confirmed.
    (b) No Claims.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an 
action (including an action pending in a Federal court as of the date 
of enactment of this Act) relating to the land described in subsection 
(a) shall not be filed or maintained in a Federal court and shall be 
promptly dismissed.
    (c) Retention of Future Rights.--Nothing in this Act alters or 
diminishes the right of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of 
Pottawatomi Indians from seeking to have any additional land taken into 
trust by the United States for the benefit of the Band.

            Passed the Senate June 19, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1603

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust for the benefit 
 of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatami Indians, and for 
                            other purposes.
```