alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,948,132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,212,744
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,625,867)
<INVENTORY>                                 27,662,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,962,567
<PP&E>                                       7,694,276
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,884,485)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,972,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,098,999
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    32,402,207
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,972,454
<SALES>                                     66,905,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,905,402
<CGS>                                       38,461,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,461,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,225,118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               419,037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (129,204)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,355,077
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,927,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,427,277
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,427,277
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1493 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to encourage the use of 

dispensing techniques that foster efficiency and reduce wasteful dispensing of outpatient prescription drugs in long-term care facilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to encourage 

the use of dispensing techniques that foster efficiency 

and reduce wasteful dispensing of outpatient prescription 

drugs in long-term care facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Efficient 

5 Drug Dispensing Act of 2013’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1493 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCENTIVES FOR USE OF DISPENSING TECHNIQUES 

2 THAT FOSTER EFFICIENCY AND REDUCE 

3 WASTEFUL DISPENSING OF OUTPATIENT 

4 DRUGS IN LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–4(c)(1) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–104(c)(1)) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(E) A payment structure that encourages 

9 the use of dispensing techniques that foster effi10 ciency and reduce wasteful dispensing of out11 patient prescription drugs in long-term care fa12 cilities.’’. 

13 (b) PHARMACY FEES.—Section 1860D–4(c)(3) of the 

14 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–104(c)(3)) is 

15 amended— 

16 (1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary shall’’ and in17 serting the following: 

18 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall’’; 

19 and 

20 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(B) CONSIDERATION IN PHARMACY

22 FEES.—The PDP sponsor of a prescription 

23 drug plan shall take into account in establishing 

24 dispensing fees for services provided in connec25 tion with dispensing covered part D drugs to 

26 enrollees who reside in a long-term care facility, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1493 IS

1 the utilization of dispensing techniques to mini2 mize the dispensing of unused drugs, and the 

3 incremental costs associated with the type of 

4 dispensing methodology and the requirements 

5 applicable to long-term care pharmacies under 

6 the program under this part. Each such spon7 sor shall not use payment structures, including 

8 prorated daily dispensing fees, that discourage 

9 the adoption of techniques to minimize the dis10 pensing of unused drugs with respect to covered 

11 part D drugs dispensed in long-term care facili12 ties. Each such sponsor shall disclose to the 

13 Secretary upon request and in accordance with 

14 the requirements of section 1860D–15(f) the 

15 amount of any such dispensing fee.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 166 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 166

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
 River connecting St. Louis, Missouri and southwestern Illinois as the 
                    ``Stan Musial Memorial Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAN MUSIAL MEMORIAL BRIDGE.

    (a) Designation.--The new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the 
Mississippi River that connects St. Louis, Missouri to southwestern 
Illinois shall be known and designated as the ``Stan Musial Memorial 
Bridge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan 
Musial Memorial Bridge''.

            Passed the Senate March 11, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 166

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
 River connecting St. Louis, Missouri and southwestern Illinois as the 
                    ``Stan Musial Memorial Bridge''.
```
Table B-1.  Standard Errors of Vacancy Rates by Area:  1998
                   (Range of 68 chances out of 100)



    Rental                       Rate   Standard   Year-to-   Standard
                                  for   error on year diff-   error on
                                 year       rate     erence difference1

United States..............       7.9        0.1        0.2        0.1
  Inside Metropolitan Areas       7.7        0.1        0.2        0.2
    In central cities......       8.2        0.2        0.1        0.2
    Not in central cities..       7.1        0.2        0.2        0.2
  Outside Metropolitan Area       9.2        0.3        0.4        0.4
  Northeast................       6.7        0.2       -0.1        0.3
  Midwest..................       7.9        0.2       -0.1        0.3
  South....................       9.6        0.2        0.5        0.3
  West.....................       6.7        0.2        0.1        0.3

                                   For-rent as a percent of all housing units

United States..............       2.6        (z)          -        0.1
  Inside Metropolitan Areas       2.7        (z)          -        0.1
  Outside Metropolitan Area       2.1        (z)          -        0.1
  Northeast................       2.4        0.1          -        0.1
  Midwest..................       2.3        0.1       -0.1        0.1
  South....................       2.9        0.1        0.1        0.1
  West.....................       2.6        0.1          -        0.1


     Homeowner
                                 Rate   Standard   Year-to-   Standard
                                  for   error on year diff-   error on
                                 year       rate     erence difference1

United States..............       1.7        (z)        0.1        (z)
  Inside Metropolitan Areas       1.6        (z)        0.1        0.1
    In central cities......       2.0        0.1        0.1        0.1
    Not in central cities..       1.5        (z)        0.1        0.1
  Outside Metropolitan Area       2.0        0.1        0.1        0.1
  Northeast................       1.5        0.1       -0.1        0.1
  Midwest..................       1.4        0.1        0.2        0.1
  South....................       2.0        0.1        0.1        0.1
  West.....................       1.7        0.1       -0.1        0.1


                                   For-sale-only as a percent of all housing units

United States..............       1.0        (z)          -        (z)
  Inside Metropolitan Areas       1.0        (z)          -        (z)
  Outside Metropolitan Area       1.2        (z)        0.1        0.1
  Northeast................       0.9        (z)          -        0.1
  Midwest..................       0.9        (z)        0.1        0.1
  South....................       1.2        (z)        0.1        0.1
  West.....................       0.9        (z)          -        0.1

  Z less than 0.05 percent.
  1Difference between 1998 rates and 1997 rates.
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-34622, 333-55142, 33-40156, 333-105273 and 333-108712 on Forms S-3 and
Nos. 33-44814, 33-63023, 333-52413, 333-52415, 333-63144 and 333-106008 on
Forms S-8 of Northeast Utilities (the Company) of our reports dated
February 23, 2004 (which express an unqualified opinion and include an
explanatory paragraph with respect to the Company's adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, effective January 1, 2001;
its adoption in 2002 of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets;
and its adoption in 2003 of EITF 03-11, Reporting Realized Gains and Losses
on Derivative Instruments that are Subject to FASB Statement No. 133 and not
"Held for Trading Purposes" as Defined in Issue No. 02-3 and Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities) appearing in and incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Northeast Utilities for the year ended December 31,
2003.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
March 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.1  Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Midwest Air Group, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Timothy E. Hoeksema Timothy E. Hoeksema Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer  /s/ Curtis E. Sawyer Curtis E. Sawyer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date: July 25, 2007    A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                        AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED            NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                               SEPTEMBER 30,                SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                            1997         1996           1997             1996
                                                          ----------  ----------      ----------      ----------

<S>                                                       <C>         <C>             <C>             <C>       
EARNINGS PER SHARE:

NET EARNINGS..............................................$1,006,000  $  576,000      $2,771,000      $1,452,000
                                                          ----------  ----------      ----------      ----------

COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING AT
   BEGINNING OF PERIOD.................................... 5,447,904   5,081,608       5,123,274       5,081,608

EFFECT OF SHARES ISSUED DURING THE PERIOD ................     1,773      12,852         242,200           4,284

EFFECT OF SHARES ISSUABLE UNDER STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
   USING THE TREASURY STOCK METHOD........................   183,536     365,421          74,829         365,411
                                                          ----------  ----------      ----------      ----------

SHARES USED IN COMPUTING EARNINGS PER SHARE .............. 5,633,213   5,459,881       5,440,303       5,451,303
                                                          ==========  ==========      ==========      ==========

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (a).............................$     0.18  $     0.11      $     0.51      $     0.27
                                                          ==========  ==========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>

(a) Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are the same.
#### In re ESTATE of Woolworth DONAHUE, Deceased.

No. 73-1477.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Paul T. Douglas, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No 21

- 774 0

EDWARD WITHERSPOON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. FRANK B. BISHOP; MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. ( 8:19

- cv - 01663

- TDC )

Submitted : March 24, 2022 Decided: March 29, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Edward Witherspoon , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Edward Witherspoon seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his
28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust his state court remedies. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealabilit y will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2 ). Because the district court denie d relief on procedural grounds, Witherspoon must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is d ebatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Witherspoon’s informal brief, we conclude that Witherspoon has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny Witherspoon’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dis miss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2.2



Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Robert N. Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (the Company) certify that the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which this statement accompanies, (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    Robert N. HoglundRobert N. Hoglund




Dated: February 22, 2006
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1542 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 

higher wages to their employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. COBURN, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. 

GRAHAM, Mr. ENZI, Mr. MORAN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. FLAKE, 

Mr. THUNE, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. WICKER, 

Mr. SCOTT, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. HATCH) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit 

employers to pay higher wages to their employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rewarding Achieve5 ment and Incentivizing Successful Employees Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RAISE Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1542 IS

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF HIGHER WAGES. 

2 Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

3 U.S.C. 159(a)) is amended— 

4 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding a labor organization’s exclusive 

7 representation of employees in a unit, or the terms and 

8 conditions of any collective bargaining contract or agree9 ment then in effect, nothing in either— 

10 ‘‘(A) section 8(a)(1) or 8(a)(5), or 

11 ‘‘(B) a collective bargaining contract or agree12 ment renewed or entered into after the date of en13 actment of the RAISE Act, 

14 shall prohibit an employer from paying an employee in the 

15 unit greater wages, pay, or other compensation for, or by 

16 reason of, his or her services as an employee of such em17 ployer, than provided for in such contract or agreement.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### BENEZ, INC., a corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Harvey GOODMAN, Appellee.

No. P-461.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 30, 1973.

John S. Duss, of Duss & Butler and Albert Datz, of Datz, Jacobson & Dusek, Jacksonville, for appellants.

David R. Lewis, of Blalock, Holbrook, Lewis, Paul & Bennett, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed herein is affirmed on authority of' the decision this day rendered in the companion case of David C. Goodman v. Harvey Goodman, Benez, Inc., a corporation, et al., Fla.App., 290 So.2d 552, with which this case has been consolidated for the purpose of appeal.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
DEPARTMENT OF OOMMEROE AND LABON-BUNEAU OF THE OENGUG surenrons Dear Wo. 12. )* Sher 6"
THIRTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 19]0—POPULATIQN ems om |
_ wane oF erry PI BL 24 Yi) Firs

‘Sour —

Fins on on ono oF com qaaparertmenwmrareseereinesecerereermer — Mt 07 wbaons hee.

Meee Niue oF an Enducrreow we Mooega Gait mms Eatonton
== ecu on [omen TT
Wh 7 4, aE lag| |B fa

et A

4% a Jo Lae [24Z 4%

uate as rz
Varaeal aez.0e leds phat Cpe
veal le =
Hr et — pam eae
ity ane kgs fe fel Babel ig
ra Le ie Lagat Tes
IB. idee Bi Wie Einpfea DY lal (oe «Woe ee |) oP
eye am we ima fe Ba a Fae
Para if alta le mit
Wy é fe || (La SE
Us i bes ¥
ie ve be nes
a ~ 2 VAT i
(rset Fa caress gia
| Ps IETAG
ti lag — LIP RNERG
ra 2 fet IDEM
islet ist} TT anx2
A {=| apse ame
ey zt z
(Whe.
a I eA
imines
Ws nea iz ite
ze Tania
a 5 (se Chaar
i Tae | uf
Pate ts lat aaa Tar
pele n
}
gz Hes, toric census records are maintain and release bythe Notional Archives and Records Administration na the U.S. Census Buren
Et 3 a |] 1
apenas a tani
i Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here. (7341, LT
=— Tea
— PEE ii tals

E WEAIRAEt Verssonis es 20 ayn rim)

a Wala else rakiva

rz
Exhibit 12.3  Orange and Rockland
Utilities, Inc. and Subsidiaries  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges  (Millions of Dollars)  For the Twelve Months
  Ended December 31,2003
  
  2002
  
  2001
  
  2000
  
  1999EarningsNet Income
  
  $
  45
  
  $
  45
  
  $
  40
  
  $
  39
  
  $
  15Federal Income &
  State Tax
  
  34
  
  24
  
  26
  
  25
  
  40Total Earnings Before
  Federal and State Income Tax
  
  79
  
  69
  
  66
  
  64
  
  55Fixed
  Charges*
  
  23
  
  30
  
  26
  
  27
  
  35Total Earnings Before
  Federal and State Income Tax and Fixed Charges
  
  $
  102
  
  $
  99
  
  $
  92
  
  $
  91
  
  $
  90*
  Fixed ChargesInterest on Long-Term
  Debt
  
  18
  
  20
  
  21
  
  22
  
  26Amortization of Debt
  Discount, Premium and Expense
  
  1
  
  1
  
  1
  
  1
  
  1Interest Component of
  Rentals
  
  2
  
  2
  
  1
  
  1
  
  3Other Interest
  
  2
  
  7
  
  3
  
  3
  
  5Total Fixed Charges
  
  $
  23
  
  $
  30
  
  $
  26
  
  $
  27
  
  $
  35Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges
  
  4.4
  
  3.3
  
  3.5
  
  3.4
  
  2.5