alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
           Fourth Quarter 2006 and 2007

           (Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   Fourth Quarter 2006

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................     10.0       7.5       9.9      12.0       8.7
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.1       3.3       3.6       2.4
      For sale only......................      1.7       1.2       1.9       1.9       1.4
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.7       0.7       0.9       0.8
      Held off market....................      4.6       3.5       4.0       5.7       4.2
        For occasional use...............      1.5       0.7       0.8       2.1       1.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.8       0.8       1.0       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.2       2.0       2.3       2.6       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.2       4.3       2.7       3.1       2.9

    Occupied.............................     86.8      88.2      87.4      84.9      88.4



                                                   Fourth Quarter 2007


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................     10.4       8.3      10.3      12.3       8.7
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.2       3.1       3.6       2.4
      For sale only......................      1.7       1.3       2.0       1.8       1.5
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.7       0.8       0.9       0.7
      Held off market....................      4.9       4.1       4.3       6.1       4.1
        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.1       0.8       2.1       1.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.7       1.0       0.9       0.7
        For other reasons................      2.5       2.2       2.6       3.1       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.5       4.1       3.0       3.5       3.4

    Occupied.............................     86.2      87.6      87.0      84.2      87.8
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  Second Quarter 2002r and 2003

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   Second quarter 2002r

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      8.9       7.4       8.2      11.0       7.5
      For rent...........................      2.7       1.9       2.6       3.2       2.4
      For sale only......................      1.0       0.8       1.2       1.2       0.8
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.8       0.8       0.8       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.5       3.9       3.6       5.8       3.6
        For occasional use...............      1.5       1.2       0.6       2.1       1.5
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.9       0.8       0.9       0.6
        For other reasons................      2.2       1.8       2.2       2.8       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.0       3.7       3.2       2.8       2.4

    Occupied.............................     88.1      89.0      88.6      86.2      90.1



                                                   Second quarter 2003


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................       100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.6       7.9       8.6      12.3       7.5
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.3       2.9       3.6       2.6
      For sale only......................      1.0       0.7       1.1       1.3       0.8
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.8       0.8       0.9       0.9       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.8       4.0       3.7       6.5       3.4
        For occasional use...............      1.7       1.5       0.7       2.5       1.6
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.8       0.7       0.7       1.0       0.5
        For other reasons................      2.3       1.9       2.3       3.0       1.3

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.0       3.3       3.4       2.8       2.5

    Occupied.............................     87.4      88.8      88.0      84.9      90.0
       rRevised
~--!---~-__'..:.0.:zj~~~@-f--1---1-::.::;__,_·J _·'_. -~_:__t-"/-1---~

1--1----1-

·-.. ------·---

L__._. __ : _

LL= 

----~'-----; -

1-==-->-<~~"""""~L....J...iL.~;<z;μ:~:--'-~~--"'=.:;.,...---~~--~-_;__£:::...~UOi:~~1...:..:::;~...::..:..:42-4~~4-Xl~~~-"-~ll=

c.L....--'1'3L..~'E-l~~-~~-'-'~--'-~----'·.1~-~-1~·:____;·~-~l~"-'-~~~-"""'~'"---..J-:.2..1-~l---:-21c~o...Jli"-IJ!IW25~"-'-"'-·~!'~-~~
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

As of December 28, 2002, the following are wholly owned subsidiaries of Bush
Industries, Inc.:

          Bush Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

          Bush Industries of Ohio, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

          Bush Management, Inc., a Florida Corporation

          Bush Service Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

          Fournier Furniture, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

          Bush Industries De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V., a Mexican Corporation

          Bush Comercial De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V., a Mexican Corporation

          The ColorWorks, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation

          Bush Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

          Bush Viotechnik GmbH, a German Corporation

          Bush Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, a German Corporation

          Rohr-Bush GmbH & Co., a German Limited Partnership
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, FORM 10-K AND THRIFT FINANCIAL REPORT AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,197
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                20,237
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    255,902
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        905,507
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,269,137
<DEPOSITS>                                     945,322
<SHORT-TERM>                                   112,264
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,449
<LONG-TERM>                                    102,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,764
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,269,137
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 79,125
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,722
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                96,847
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              39,321
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,843
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           44,004
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,317
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 118
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 34,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,899
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,710
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,811)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.58
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,266
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,350
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,976
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,212
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,903
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,852
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,051
        

</TABLE>
cSt 0) = numbered 2, 1 and 17 are not to be acked im respect to infants. Inquiries numbered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are to be answered (if at all
Page:No, 4 a Inquiries 6, merely by an affirmative mark, as /. iain veep oe

Scuepctz 1. sinliitee in 2 tind -cBhadatriee in the County of Cage Lege _, State
of hich enumerated by me om the La day- of 29 TSH. _-
Lahti ae 2

Post Oo 7 fa

————— $$$

="

4, |
hp LlLC ee Ass't Marshal.

CONSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONS,

)
|

.
| ]
VALUE a EstaTE fs nee caw

<

~

|

|

i

ite (W.), Mrick

|

of
2! yeurs of age and up

wurils,

Whether deaf
and dumb,

than re-

vellion of other enme,

Place of Birth, naming State
or Territory of U. S.; or the
Country, if of foreign birth.

The name of every person whoee
place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

te vote ba

» give wonths
deuiel of abridged on

—————

blind, insane,

tte (M.), Chi-

or idiotic.

i

of vieitativa,
nat birthalny. If
year,
jona, thus, Yr
ales (M,),

Poruules (F.)

=W

(Bo Mu

If born within the year, state
month (Jan., Feb., &ce.)

If married within the yenr, state
month (Jun., Feb., &c.)

Attended school within the year

years of age and opwards,

Male Citivensof U.S. of 2!

in frac
Sex.—}
nere (C.), Indian (1.)
Father of foreign birth.
Mother of foreign birth
Cannot read.
Cannot write,
Male Citizens of TLS
whowe rivht

Dwelling-honaes. numbered ip
the order of visitation

| other groands

Age at
| under

te Families, pnmbered tn the order
@® | Value of Real Estate.
@ | Value of Personal Estate,

By
=
=a
te
as
Oe
co
fo
ms
=P)
as
~?

10

—

One ola.

'Be Broke

Aaslina te

Historic census records are ualeriadiaed and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

KR
PS

http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

WZ 2 f08| 2.0L | fie Ce

—

(Hola cf
L0 LZO Ltn. Craft

“asa families, 7 Ct ee | colored males, / ta Sas, ae “6 Gg
ry “ females, _ & & blind,
EXHIBIT 32.1SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     I, Ronald W. Hovsepian, Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), hereby certify that: (1) The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-K for the yearended October 31, 2006(the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.* * *CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER   /s/ Ronald W. Hovsepian Ronald W. Hovsepian  Date: May 25, 2007
#### Richard AUGUSTINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-729.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 10, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Vaughn J. Rudnick, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Gladyce Inez FORD, Petitioner, v. BAY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Respondent.

No. 41798.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 18, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 253 So.2d 727.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### James M. O’BRIEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-294.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 24, 1968.

James M. O’Brien, in pro. per.

*43Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As AdoptedPursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

**Certification**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Logan CountyBancShares, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:           February 28, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/  Mark Mareske        |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Mark  Mareske            |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1679 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1679

        To require a study on the Russian RD-180 rocket engine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 12, 2013

  Mr. Toomey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To require a study on the Russian RD-180 rocket engine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Security Rocket Engine 
Study Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON RUSSIAN RD-180 ROCKET ENGINE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report on the Russian RD-180 rocket 
engine.
    (b) Elements.--The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include the following elements:
            (1) An assessment of the feasibility of manufacturing an 
        alternative rocket engine in the United States.
            (2) An estimate of the cost of manufacturing an alternative 
        rocket engine in the United States, including any cost savings 
        that manufacturing a domestic alternative provides compared to 
        the cost of buying Russian engines over the life of the Evolved 
        Expendable Launch Vehicle program.
            (3) A description of policy benefits and policy concerns 
        related to where the rocket engine is manufactured.
    (c) Comptroller General Review.--The Comptroller General shall 
review the report submitted under subsection (a) and submit the results 
of its study to the congressional defense committees.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SARAH BLYTH and JOSEPH GUARACINO,

Appellants,

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-537

[August 18, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 14-

6149(11).

F. Scott Fistel of the Fistel Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellants.

Adam G. Schwartz of Fox McCluskey Bush Robison PLLC, Stuart, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s order denying their entitlement to 

attorney’s fees after they prevailed in appellee’s foreclosure action against 

them on the grounds that appellee did not have standing to foreclose under 

the mortgage and note. We reverse on the authority of Page v. Deutsche 

Bank Trust Co. Americas, 308 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 2020).

In Page, the court construed section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes (2019),

which allows for a reciprocal award of prevailing party attorney’s fees. The 

statute requires in the first clause “the existence of ‘a contract [that] 

contains a provision allowing attorney’s fees to a party when he or she is 

required to take any action to enforce the contract.’” Id. at 959 (citing § 

57.105(7), Fla. Stat.). And “the statutory language [of section 57.105(7)] 

also requires that the plaintiff and defendant not be strangers to the 

contract.” Id. The statute requires in the second clause that the party 

must prevail. Id.
2

Here, the mortgage and note upon which appellee filed suit to foreclose 

contained an attorney’s fees provision. Appellants prevailed in the action 

when appellee, who obtained its position by assignment, failed to prove 

standing.

Moreover, the parties in this case are not strangers to the contract. 

While appellee claims that it was not a party to the note, because it was 

never assigned the note, it sued on both the note and mortgage and 

represented in its complaint that it was entitled to enforce the note and 

held the note. It also sought to establish a lost note, stating that it had 

acquired the note. Both the note and mortgage contained an attorney’s 

fee provision. Even if appellee had not been assigned the note, appellants

would still be entitled to fees under section 57.105(7), because of the fee 

provision in the mortgage. See Madl v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 244 So. 3d 

1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), and Harris v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 311 So. 3d 

66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018), approved in Page, 308 So. 2d at 961. Pursuant to 

Page, appellants are entitled to their prevailing party attorney’s fees.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

CONNER, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, Appellant, v. Joel MILLER, Appellee.

No. 71-473.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth. District.

Aug. 16, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart F. LaMotte, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
i

seething nl
Towns of orven owisiow oF county. Fe

erantwen or CéuMENCE-aUNEAU OF THE-CENGUD oven °

FOURTEENTH OENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1820-POPULATION 204 leucunon ost nose?

cereale uannny MME OF Neato rast Paranda ical
~ 2

[SUPERVISORS DISTRICT NO... _ | ‘Sueer No. ii

Ware i Rasen he. 828K

UMERATC OY ME OH TE.

fot or-(Wwhisadag md GPotdliaBoylatere as

‘census records are maintained

ist http://www archives.gov for more information about publicly avallable records like the one shown here.

and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

ieocea

i

a

Tae

al a

pon A
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.6
 
                     CAL FED BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                          COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS
 
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    OUTSTANDING BALANCE OF COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS
                         ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
         YEAR OF           0-    750K-  1,000K- 2,000K- 3,000K- 4,000K- 5,000K-                % OF
       ORIGINATION        749K   999K   1,999K  2,999K  3,999K  4,999K  5,999K  6,000K+ TOTAL  TOTAL
       -----------       ------  -----  ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ -----
                                                   (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S>                      <C>     <C>    <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>    <C>
1996.................... $  0.5  $  --   $  --   $  --   $  --   $  --   $ --    $  --  $  0.5   0.1%
1995....................    1.5     --      --      --      --      --     --       --     1.5   0.3
1994....................    3.8    1.8     5.2      --      --     5.0     --     28.3    44.1   8.9
1993....................    3.3    0.9      --      --      --      --     --       --     4.2   0.9
1992....................    0.8     --     1.3      --     6.8      --     --      7.7    16.6   3.3
1991....................    0.2     --      --      --      --      --     --       --     0.2    --
1990....................    0.7     --      --      --      --      --     --       --     0.7   0.1
1989....................   16.7     --     1.0     2.1      --      --     --      7.7    27.5   5.5
1988....................   61.4   17.7    22.6     2.2     7.0     9.0     --       --   119.9  24.1
1987....................   55.4   14.1    29.2    10.3    10.1      --    5.2       --   124.3  25.1
1986....................   49.3    8.3    11.8     5.0      --     4.6     --       --    79.0  15.9
1985....................   23.6    9.3    11.3     2.0      --      --     --       --    46.2   9.3
1984....................    4.4     --     1.2     2.8      --      --     --       --     8.4   1.7
1983....................     --    0.8      --      --      --      --     --     10.6    11.4   2.3
1982....................     --     --      --      --      --      --     --       --      --    --
1981....................     --     --      --      --      --      --     --       --      --    --
Prior to 1981...........   12.6     --      --      --      --      --     --       --    12.6   2.5
                         ------  -----   -----   -----   -----   -----   ----    -----  ------ -----
 Total ................. $234.2  $52.9   $83.6   $24.4   $23.9   $18.6   $5.2    $54.3  $497.1 100.0%
                         ======  =====   =====   =====   =====   =====   ====    =====  ====== =====
% of Total..............   47.3%  10.6%   16.8%    4.9%    4.8%    3.7%   1.0%    10.9%
                         ======  =====   =====   =====   =====   =====   ====    =====
</TABLE>
 
                                       46