alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 34645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15587]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15584 and #15585; Texas Disaster Number TX-
00500]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for the State of 
Texas

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-4377-DR), dated 07/06/2018.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/19/2018 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 07/06/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/04/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/08/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 07/06/2018, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Cameron, 
Hidalgo
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Texas: Brooks, Kenedy, Starr, Willacy.

The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      3.875
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.938
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      7.220
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      3.610
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      3.610
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 155846 
and for economic injury is 155850.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)


James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-15587 Filed 7-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Table B-5.  Standard Errors of Homeownership Rates for the United States by Age of Householder and by Family Status:  2000

                                                                                                                 Two or more
                                                   Married-      Other family      One person  household         person households
                                           United    couple
                                           States  families      Male    Female      Male     Female      Male    Female

Total                                         0.1       0.1       (X)       (X)       (X)        (X)       (X)       (X)

  Other family households...............      0.3       (X)       0.5       0.3       (X)        (X)       (X)       (X)
  One person households.................      0.2       (X)       (X)       (X)       0.3        0.3       (X)       (X)
  Two or more persons households........      0.4       (X)       (X)       (X)       (X)        (X)       0.6       0.7
   Less than 25 years...................      0.4       0.9       1.4       0.8       0.9        0.8       (X)       (X)
   25 to 29 years.......................      0.4       0.6       1.6       0.8       0.9        1.0       (X)       (X)
   30 to 34 years.......................      0.3       0.4       1.6       0.9       1.0        1.2       (X)       (X)
   35 to 39 years.......................      0.3       0.3       1.5       0.9       1.0        1.3       (X)       (X)
   40 to 44 years.......................      0.3       0.3       1.4       0.8       1.0        1.2       (X)       (X)
   45 to 49 years.......................      0.3       0.3       1.6       0.9       1.0        1.1       (X)       (X)
   50 to 54 years.......................      0.3       0.3       1.8       1.1       1.1        1.0       (X)       (X)
   55 to 59 years.......................      0.3       0.3       2.2       1.3       1.3        1.0       (X)       (X)
   60 to 64 years.......................      0.4       0.3       2.6       1.4       1.4        1.0       (X)       (X)
   65 to 69 years.......................      0.3       0.3       2.8       1.4       1.5        0.9       (X)       (X)
   70 to 74 years.......................      0.4       0.4       2.5       1.4       1.3        0.8       (X)       (X)
   75 years and over....................      0.3       0.3       1.8       0.9       0.9        0.5       (X)       (X)

     Less than 35 years.................      0.2       0.3       0.9       0.5       0.6        0.6       0.7       0.8
     35 to 44 years.....................      0.2       0.2       1.0       0.6       0.7        0.9       1.3       1.7
     45 to 54 years.....................      0.2       0.2       1.2       0.7       0.8        0.7       1.6       1.7
     55 to 64 years.....................      0.2       0.2       1.7       1.0       1.0        0.7       2.2       2.2
     65 years and over..................      0.2       0.2       1.3       0.7       0.7        0.4       2.3       2.4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      16,298,540
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     157,900,064
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,026,547
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 31,180,375
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    153,486,630
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,588,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             219,710,923
<DEPOSITS>                                 187,176,924
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            785,833
<LONG-TERM>                                  8,902,779
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       788,924
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,056,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             219,710,923
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             15,481,198
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,928,012
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               421,559
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            17,830,768
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,092,923
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,491,748
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,339,020
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,460,332
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              9,111,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,054,469
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,054,469
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,103,638
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.92
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,342,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   281,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,707,913
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  839,009
<RECOVERIES>                                   259,461
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,588,697
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,588,697
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
#### Clyde RICHBOURG and Loretta Richbourg, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Maurice WALKER, Appellee.

No. S-60.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 18, 1973.

Roderic G. Magie, of Levin, Warfield, Graff, Mabie & Rosenbloum, Pensacola, for appellants.

*652Joe J. Harrell, of Harrell, Wiltshire, Bozeman, Clark & Stone, Pensacola, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

■ The sole questions presented on this appeal relate to evidentiary matters. The trial judge has, upon substantial evidence, resolved the disputed factual matters. The judgment appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lawrence WILLIAMS, v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 54465.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1974.

In re: Lawrence Williams applying for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Certiorari, Prohibition and other remedial writs.

Writ granted. Considering the return of the district attorney, the trial court is ordered to grant an out-of-time appeal, returnable upon such date as may be fixed by it.

SUMMERS, and MARCUS, JJ., dissent. This action of the Court is categorically opposed to this Court’s decision in State v. Ash, 257 La. 337, 242 So.2d 535 (1971).
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), and
is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                              /s/ Steven Rosenberg
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Steven Rosenberg,
                                              Chief Executive Officer, President
                                              and Chief Financial Officer

                                              March 21, 2003
August 21, 2013

By e-mail: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

Daniel Cohen

Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulatory Law

Office of the General Counsel

Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585–0121 

Re: Ex Parte Memorandum

Dear Mr. Cohen:

On Thursday, August 15, 2013, Meg Waltner and David Goldstein of the Natural Resources Defense 

Council (NRDC) initiated a telephone call with Joe Hagerman, Kym Carey, and Jeremy Williams of the 

Department of Energy’s Building Technologies Office and Kavita Vaidyanathan of DOE’s Office of the 

General Counsel. 

During the call, NRDC briefed DOE on some of the proposals and proposed modifications NRDC has 

submitted to the 2015 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). Specifically, NRDC discussed 

proposals RE-188, RE-123, and public comments submitted on these proposals. 

DOE representatives explained how it produces IECC code change proposals, and participates in the 

International Code Council (ICC) code development process, as presented in the Federal Register Notice

published on April 19, 2013 (78 FR 23550).

Respectfully submitted,

Meg Waltner

Manager, Building Energy Policy

Natural Resources Defense Council

111 Sutter Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

cc: Kit Kennedy Kym Carey

David Goldstein Jeremy Williams

Daniel Cohen Kavita Vaidyanathan

Joe Hagerman
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner  of
      ICON
      Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the
      Quarterly Report of ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven (the "Partnership”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify,
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      my knowledge:





1.  The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m); and





2.  The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.








*Dated:*  *May
      15, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner




ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven
#### FLORIDA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. MORRIS STEVENS NURSERIES, St. Vincent’s Hospital and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 36417.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1967.

Keen, O’Kelley & Spitz, A. Frank O’Kelley, Victor M. Cawthon, and Helen C. Ellis, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay and B. T. Miller, Jacksonville, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 23, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

That portion of the Commission’s Order awarding attorney’s fees to the claimant’s attorneys was not proper and is quashed. Florida Statutes Section 440.34 (1), F.S.A. provides only for payment of attorney’s fees for the “injured” employee.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law other than as indicated above.

The petition for writ of certiorari is, therefore, granted and the Order of the Full Commission is quashed in part and affirmed in part.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ„ concur.
# tab1
Exhibit 10.18.2

 

SECOND AMENDMENT

TO THE HUMACYTE, INC.

2005 STOCK OPTION PLAN


 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to the Humacyte, Inc. 2005
Stock Option Plan is dated as of October 28, 2011.


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Humacyte, Inc.
(the “Company”) has adopted and the shareholders of the Company have approved the Humacyte, Inc. 2005 Stock
Option Plan, as amended on March 31, 2008 (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors determines that
it is in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan in order to increase the number of shares of common stock issuable
pursuant to options granted under the Plan from Two Million Two Hundred Ten Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-Four (2,210,254) shares
to Four Million Five Hundred Twenty-Two Thousand Sixty-Four (4,522,064) shares.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:


 


1. The first sentence of Paragraph 5.1 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:


 


“Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14.1,
the aggregate number of shares of Stock reserved and available for Awards or which may be used to provide a basis of measurement
for or to determine the value of an Award (such as with a Stock Appreciation Right or Performance Share Award) shall be Four Million
Five Hundred Twenty-Two Thousand Sixty-Four (4,522,064), of which not more than one third may be granted as Awards of Restricted
Stock or unrestricted Stock Awards.”


 


2. Except as herein amended, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as originally adopted and
approved.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby certifies
that this Second Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors as of October 28, 2011 and by the shareholders of the Company
as of October 28, 2011.
#### Bob JANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-419.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 9, 1971.

Motion granted.
EXHIBIT 11

                 Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss per share is calculated as follows:
(Unaudited, in thousands)
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED                  SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                              JUNE 30,                           JUNE 30,
                                                      1999             1998              1999             1998
                                                  --------------  ----------------   --------------  ---------------
<S>                                               <C>             <C>                <C>             <C>
Net loss                                               $ (6,121)         $ (5,616)         $(9,723)         $(9,452)
                                                  ==============  ================   ==============  ===============

BASIC:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding           9,988             2,162            9,972            2,139
                                                  ==============  ================   ==============  ===============

     Net loss per common share                          $ (0.61)          $ (2.60)         $ (0.98)         $ (4.42)
                                                  ==============  ================   ==============  ===============

DILUTED:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding           9,988             2,162            9,972            2,139
     Effect of dilutive securities:
         Convertible notes                                    -                 -                -                -
         Stock options                                        -                 -                -                -
         Warrants                                             -                 -                -                -
                                                  --------------  ----------------   --------------  ---------------
     Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares outstanding                    9,988             2,162            9,972            2,139
                                                  ==============  ================   ==============  ===============

     Net loss per common and common
         equivalent share                               $ (0.61)          $ (2.60)         $ (0.98)         $ (4.42)
                                                  ==============  ================   ==============  ===============

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          32,688
<SECURITIES>                                     4,265
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,048
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,785
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,661
<PP&E>                                           9,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,041
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,662)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,931
<SALES>                                          2,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,669
<CGS>                                            1,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,071)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,071)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,071)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
No. 11188.

#### The Farmers' Mutual Relief Association *v.*McClain.

Decided October 19, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Mr. Charles F. Sprague*and *Mr. James W. Half-hill,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. C. L. Fess*and *Mr.*
      *502
      *W. H. Leete,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
No. 11024.

#### Gray et al. *v.*Arb.

Decided September 28, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana county.

*Mr. W. F. Tones,*for plaintiffs in error!

*Messrs. Wells & McDonald*and *Messrs. Potts & Wells,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear and Price, JJ., concur.