alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947986
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          9,639,243
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 140,757,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                      877,222
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                228,933,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                       142,053,768
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     78,542,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  228,933,630
<SALES>                                        12,103,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,392,150
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,197,927
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  700,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,937,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,556,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.90
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 
10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                       56,583
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                 7,923
<ALLOWANCES>                    394
<INVENTORY>                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             68,629
<PP&E>                       12,056
<DEPRECIATION>                5,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               82,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        11,343
<BONDS>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<COMMON>                        117
<OTHER-SE>                   68,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 82,159
<SALES>                       8,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              8,295
<CGS>                         2,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 6,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (994)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (358)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (631)
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                   (631)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.05)
        



</TABLE>
#### Patrick C. HARDIE and Guy W. Smith v. William M. JUSTICE, Jr., John F. Short and Gail B. Short.

No. 61518.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: William M. Justice, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson. 353 So.2d 384.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS and DENNIS, JJ., vote to grant.
#### IMPERIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, formerly Fallan-Smith Corporation, a Colorado corporation, Appellant, v. Samuel SEGAL, Appellee.

No. 70-986.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 10, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Otis Farrington, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
R18-2-216. Interpretation of Ambient Air Quality Standards and Evaluation of Air Quality 

Data

Unless otherwise specified, interpretation of all ambient air quality standards contained in this 

Article shall be in accordance with 40 CFR 50, incorporated by reference in Appendix 2 of this 

Chapter.

Historical Note

Adopted effective May 14, 1979 (Supp. 79-1). Former Section R9-3-216 repealed, new 

Section R9-3-216 adopted effective August 29, 1980 (Supp. 80-4). Former Section R9-3-

216 renumbered without change as Section R18-2-216 (Supp. 87-3). Amended effective 

September 26, 1990 (Supp. 90-3). Amended by final rulemaking at 15 A.A.R. 281, 

effective March 7, 2009 (Supp. 09-1).
EPARTHENT OF COMMEROE AND LABOR-BUREAU OF THE OEND

. ' wari
er “ 2 t { me SuPEAISORS: DISTAL . a
on 1) a CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1910—POPULATION anal ye

ewontearion Doracr OLAS Lae ¥ Be
oe Wt oF oY PP
& mstrur_ :

= = _Enwwenaror.
ia a el
: fa A : ~ :

Township on ovjign StisioN oF county
at Rt

aa

SRR
RE

Pee

ERE!

fier

ag

i

fled pando

SERRE

ze

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the

e one shown here.

al

Ssesseessissasese sees z
EXHIBIT 32-1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of MangoSoft, Inc. and Subsidiary
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine month ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dale Vincent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Dale Vincent
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive and
financial officer)
November 14, 2005

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.


                                       22
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50678 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ABEL HUMBERTO SERRANO-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-78-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Abel Humberto Serrano-Gomez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
of cL atisse Silberdted by me, on the atk day: of ff L cee saitatert

EF LE OG ES FT. ee
_—— —— . - Se se LO SS ey TE, eel oy

'| ‘Persons over 20 y’rs of age
who cannot read & write.

+ '
|

¢

,

;
°

Families numbered ;

t

2 ee ae a”
a Anon

. “DEACRIPTION.

=> ol
’
;

@

| Whether deaf and
dumb, blind, insane,
| idiotic, pauper, or
- convict.

Puace oF Biatu.

—~~

The Name of every Perscn whose usual place | Profession, Occupation, or Trade

White, |

houses

of each Male Person over 15

mulatto.

black, or}

ttended School

of abode on the first day of June, 1850, was Naming the State, Territory,

3

numbered in the

ea ee eee

Married within the |

years of age. or Country.

in the order of!

order of visitation
visitation.

within the year.

owned.

in this family,

year.

Value of Real oo }

Dwellin
Color,

lA

iy
D
e |

—_—_— ~~
— ——— —

} sae , - zs ; ; |
IKKE Loy Pd Aa a ae. S| z' | | @. S fae Soke aie
C_ Sie “mn | | | | Zee

(DO e ch te aoe ee &
7 '
—-
| COL Gt Oe C LU Ld A , | Cs
5 Of, ; } e sg , Ng ia -
MELE xiacr Plccbitina| Geox 4 Co

ahh wor = aida : Z | , | 4 aZL,

TPL f Le oz ) fe | Z_ / | | | ? ttt.
OC

4 ee ESS ee
cb Seis a Pe a re “f ~ | ote
PGP eo Awe La | ?

thn 4 cl ce~e CLE

: LOOP CS | | : | | LC,

eb obi tA

Har a oo

| aterla, |
|

Pe” ee 5

Bes ae (LE me

Pete tee ao
a eee p

Pe re

eH og Gg. <— Z | Se | Se i a i.)
ie ae y Lao
(Bo Cerere 12 | | Ce

= Historic census records are maintained and released by
pA eee Ae the National Archives and Records Administration,

Pp ree pee ne St sod not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Bis typn———— Visit http:/;www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

|

i
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-23-00190-CV

__________________

LEE PEVOTEAUX, Appellant

V.

DAVID NACKE, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 23-33202

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In June 2023, Lee Pevoteaux filed a notice appealing from the final judgment 

in Trial Cause Number 23-33202. But after perfecting his appeal, Pevoteaux failed 

to file a brief.

In October 2023, the Clerk of the Ninth Court of Appeals notified the parties 

that Pevoteaux had not filed a brief and advised the parties that his appeal would be 

submitted without briefs unless the Court received Pevoteaux’s brief by November 

2, 2023, and a motion to extend the deadline for filing the brief. We also warned
2

Pevoteaux that his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the Court 

submitted his appeal without briefs.

On November 15, 2023, the Clerk notified the parties that on December 6, 

2023, the Court had submitted the appeal without briefs and without oral argument. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Since no brief has been filed in the appeal assigning any 

error to a ruling of the trial court, we dismiss Pevoteaux’s appeal for want of 

prosecution. See id. 38.8(a)(1); id. 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 6, 2023

Opinion Delivered December 7, 2023

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
Table 9.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  2003 and 2002/r
 
(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding
 
 
                                           Standard
                                           error on Standard    2003
Type                      2003      2002/r    2003  error on  Percent
                         estimate estimate estimatedifferenc of total
 
All housing units....... 120,834  119,297      172      244      100
 
  Occupied.............. 105,560  104,965      181      256       87
    Owner occupied......  72,054   71,278      181      256       60
    Renter occupied.....  33,506   33,687      144      204       28
 
  Vacant................  15,274   14,332      103      144       13
    Year-round vacant...  11,631   10,771       91      127       10
      For rent..........   3,676    3,347       52       72        3
      For sale only.....   1,308    1,220       31       44        1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy     976      842       27       37        1
      Held off market...   5,671    5,362       65       90        5
        For occasional u   1,989    1,819       39       54        2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence      994      995       27       39        1
        For other reason   2,688    2,548       45       63        2
 
    Seasonal vacant.....   3,643    3,561       52       73        3
 
 
/r Revised.
ges Inquiries numbered 7, 16, and 17 are not to be asked in respect to infants. Inquiries numbered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are to be answered (if at all)
Page No. es, merely by an affirmative mark, as /.

Souepute 1.—Inhabitants in/7Z242% Ly felis we. een lca SES Le ie Z J , State
of Arata , enumerated . me on the aéF we of ~ he ; 1870. , ae |
chy. ,

Post Office : ie te wy Loot j sans et ae Ass’t Marshal.

—

EpUCA- CONSTITUTIONAL

| VALUE OF REAL ESTATE
TION, RELATIONS,

I

If born within the year, state
of

21 years of age and up-

|

Whether deaf
and dumb,
blind, insane,
or idiotic.

Place of Birth, naming State
or Territory of U. S.; or the
Country, if of foreign birth.

Profession, Occupation,
or Trade of each person,

The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

)
F,)

V.), Bluck| 2
M.), Chi-

an (1,)

of yisitation.

male or female.

emales
ulatto

nese (C.), Indi

ales (M.),
V hite (

the order of visitation.
I

month (Jan., Feb., &ce.)
month (Jun., Feb., &e.)

in fractions, thus, Pe:

warcda,

Male Citizens of U.S. of 21

(B.), 3

Dwelling-houses, numbered in

Families, numbered In the order

Age at Inst birth-day. If
under | year, give months

Father of foreign birth.

Mother of foreign birth.

If married within the year, state
years of age and upwards,
whore right to vote Is
denied or abridged on
otber grounds than re-
bellion or other crime

—_—

Male Citizena of U, 8.

Cannot write.

Sex,—)
Color.—

| Attended school within the year.

Q@® | Value of Real Estate.
© | Value of Personal Estate.

7

21y| er howe Lead jead

Oy | GAL hee Z Z
4 fe A

‘)

ead
tw
ro
or
on
_
—
—
i)
ce
ee
=
ne
we

t
—y
~)

=~

7

Spette)
2 I7 U /

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Aatelpnkh !\FWG |G ti llcace [2 K“2rtcezeca |/ \L

ee ae. A-| ‘S eT IRN
|Z Claw Zz Pee! LY ap } Le aa ee en

in Tips.

Nee ir ig
ea tae! Log
O wae
| Bea tHe

a

a

Gesease.
Le ay
Lato

NESSES

>

RW RS AKA HS

&

ke BS BS FEMS IA ke AS iss He [fs Ps |

SRN AN $ Be PS A ES Ko SS

SSIS

No. of dwellings, 7 No. of white females, ad x No. of males, foreign born,

“« “ families, es *« colored males, “« * females, ‘“ “ j

“ « white males, 4} ¢ “6  formales, “ & blind,

— ——r —— —— _——~ — —- ———_ —— —- ———
— — —__——— —_—_——
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-34653 and 333-84387) pertaining to the Congoleum Corporation
1995 Stock Option Plan and the Non-Qualified, Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan of our report dated March 5, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Congoleum Corporation included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.


                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                 ---------------------
                                                   Ernst & Young LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2005
From: Adams, Darryl [mailto:Adams.Darryl@epa.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 10:27 PM
To: Higgins, Cortney; Culligan, Kevin Cc: Wayland, Robertj; Curry, Bridgid; Eck, Janet Subject: RE: Final version of EGU GHG EG proposal

Okay, thank you. I'll do that first thing Monday morning 7am-ish. Have a good weekend.

Darryl Adams Regulatory Management Division Office of Policy, U.S. EPA 202 564-6569 Mail Code 1806A, Room 6440U WJC North

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 10:21 PM
To: Adams, Darryl; Culligan, Kevin Cc: Wayland, Robertj; Curry, Bridgid Subject: RE: Final version of EGU GHG EG proposal

Hi Darryl,

I will send a note with the drafts attached similar to what I did for the mods/reconstructed, along with instructions to upload.

Regards, Cortney

From: Adams, Darryl [mailto:Adams.Darryl@epa.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 10:18 PM
To: Culligan, Kevin; Higgins, Cortney Cc: Wayland, Robertj; Curry, Bridgid Subject: RE: Final version of EGU GHG EG proposal

Thanks Kevin. Confirming that this is EPA's official version for upload - correct?

Darryl AdamsRegulatory Management Division Office of Policy, U.S. EPA 202 564-6569 Mail Code 1806A, Room 6440U WJC North

From: Culligan, Kevin Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 10:12 PM
To: Higgins, Cortney Cc: Wayland, Robertj; Adams, Darryl; Curry, Bridgid Subject: FW: Final version of EGU GHG EG proposal
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 23, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-555

Lower Tribunal No. 17-18797

________________

Marv A. Hubbard,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto,

Judge.

Marv A. Hubbard, in proper person. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER, and FERNANDEZ, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Defendant filed this appeal of the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ

of Habeas Corpus. As the trial court correctly noted, the petition is actually a
motion to vacate judgment, which was denied by the trial court. We treat the

petition the same and affirm the trial court’s denial.

Affirmed. 

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7383

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH RAY STEVENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District 

Judge. (1:08-cr-00015-JPJ-1; 1:10-cv-80254)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 22, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Ray Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Ray Stevens seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Stevens has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1455 

To condition the provision of premium and cost-sharing subsidies under the 

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act upon a certification that 

a program to verify household income is operational. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. COBURN (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To condition the provision of premium and cost-sharing subsidies under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 

Act upon a certification that a program to verify household income is operational. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exchange Verification 

5 of Eligibility to Receive Income-Related Funds for Individ6 uals’’ or the ‘‘Requiring E-VERIFI Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1455 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONDITIONING PROVISION OF PREMIUM AND COST2 SHARING SUBSIDIES UNDER THE PATIENT 

3 PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT 

4 UPON CERTIFICATION THAT A PROGRAM TO 

5 VERIFY HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND OTHER 

6 QUALIFICATIONS FOR THOSE SUBSIDIES IS 

7 OPERATIONAL. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no pre9 mium tax credits shall be permitted under section 36B of 

10 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and no reductions in 

11 cost-sharing shall be permitted under section 1402 of the 

12 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 

13 18071) prior to the date on which the Inspector General 

14 of the Department of Health and Human Services certifies 

15 to Congress that there is in place a program that success16 fully and consistently verifies, consistent with section 1411 

17 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 18081), the household income and 

18 coverage requirements of individuals applying for such 

19 credits and cost-sharing reduction reductions. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS