alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert H. ARNOW, Appellant, v. Robert K. OVERSTREET, as Dade County Tax Collector, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-321.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34850-34851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE

[GAO-18-568G]


2018 Revision--Government Auditing Standards

AGENCY: U.S. Government Accountability Office.

ACTION: Notice of document availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued its 
2018 revision to Government Auditing Standards, known as the ``Yellow 
Book.'' To help ensure that the standards continue to meet the needs of 
the government auditing community, the Comptroller General of the 
United States established the Yellow Book Advisory Council to provide 
input on revisions to the Yellow Book. This 2018 revision of the 
standards includes the Advisory Council's input regarding the changes. 
It also includes input from public comments received on the 2017 
exposure draft. The changes contained in the 2018 revision to 
Government Auditing Standards reflect major developments in the 
auditing, accountability, and financial management professions.
    The 2018 revision to Government Auditing Standards is available in 
electronic format for download from GAO's web page at www.gao.gov using 
GAO-18-568G as a report number. It will also be available for sale in 
hardcopy from the Government Publishing Office in the near future at 
http://bookstore.gpo.gov or other GPO locations listed there. GAO-18-
568G may be used to find its GPO stock number and ISBN.

DATES: The 2018 revision will be effective for financial audits, 
attestation engagements, and reviews of financial statements for 
periods ending on or after June 30, 2020, and for performance audits 
beginning on or after July 1, 2019. Early implementation is not 
permitted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on Government Auditing 
Standards, please submit questions electronically to James R. Dalkin,

[[Page 34851]]

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7128141d1d1e06331e1e1a3116101e5f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c099a5acacafb782afafab80a7a1afeea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a> or telephonically to 202-512-9535.

    Authority:  Pub. L. 67-13, 42 Stat. 20 (June 10, 1921).

James R. Dalkin,
Director, Financial Management and Assurance, U.S. Government 
Accountability Office.
[FR Doc. 2018-15629 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1610-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
      Edward
      B. Meyercord, III, Chief Executive Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. have
      reviewed Talk America Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) and, based on the inquiries I
      have made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as
      the
      Chief Executive Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., I hereby certify
      that:





(i)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)
      the
      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America Holdings,
      Inc.





/s/
      Edward B. Meyercord, III


Edward
      B.
      Meyercord, III


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


November
      9 ,
      2006
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 7, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 23, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Sean M. McCarthy                      
|                      |  |  |  | Sean M. McCarthy                          
|                      |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich
Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of First Investors Financial Services, Inc., (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, TommyA. Moore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Act of 1934; and

(2)                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  December12, 2003

 
|   | By: /s/ Tommy A. Moore, Jr. |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Tommy A. Moore, Jr.         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 12

                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (Amounts in Millions, Except Ratios)
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                                                          March 31,
                                                                                   1999             1998
                                                                               ------------     ------------

<S>                                                                            <C>              <C>         
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes ...................    $        6.4     $       28.5

Add (deduct) distributions greater (less) than
     income of unconsolidated affiliates ..................................            (0.1)            (2.2)

Fixed charges from below ..................................................            65.9             37.7

Capitalized interest included in fixed charges ............................            (0.1)            (1.8)
                                                                               ------------     ------------

         Earnings available for fixed charges .............................    $       72.1     $       62.2
                                                                               ============     ============


Fixed charges:
     Interest expense, including amortization of debt expense/discount ....    $       64.3     $       34.0
     Portion of rentals representing an interest factor ...................             1.5              1.9
     Interest capitalized .................................................             0.1              1.8
                                                                               ------------     ------------
         Total fixed charges ..............................................    $       65.9     $       37.7
                                                                               ============     ============


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................................             1.1              1.7
                                                                               ============     ============
</TABLE>
1

BECKHAM, LISA

From: SHOJI, KERRY

Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 1:17 PM

To: Lee, Anita

Cc: COHEN, Deborra; Ziegler, Cynthia

Subject: RE: literature search on acid deposition to milk vetch - 

Attachments: Mancos-milk-vetch-5-yr-review-2011.pdf

Hi Anita, 

 Both Cynthia and I searched for recent journal articles. We could not locate any on your specific topic using the 

search terms you provided. Aside from similar references which repeated the statement in the 1989 FWS recovery 

plan, we could not locate any journal articles providing evidence or further research conducted supporting the 

statement that acid deposition from power plants are a potential threat to the plant. The following webpage lists 

research on this plant under the reference 

header: http://www.centerforplantconservation.org/collection/cpc_viewprofile.asp?CPCNum=414 

 The only report I can find supporting the statement that acid deposition from power plants are a threat to the plant 

is FWS 2011 Five Year Review on the Mancos Milk Vetch which I have attached for your review. On page 17 the review 

notes a proposed Desert Rock Energy Project where a biological assessment found the project will expose the plant to 

and impact it from deposition of contaminants from two existing power plants. The report was by Ecosphere 

Environmental Services in 2008 for the Bureau of Indian Affairs. I will attempt to locate a copy of the report for you. 

--Kerry Shoji 

From: Lee, Anita 

Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 11:22 AM 

To: SHOJI, KERRY 

Subject: literature search on acid deposition to milk vetch 

Hi Kerry, 

Thanks for walking me through what you would need to do a literature search. I am interested in determining whether 

there is any recent literature looking at effects of acid deposition on endangered plants in the Four Corners area. 

Specifically, I am interested in sulfuric acid and the endangered Mancos milk-vetch. 

This stems from a very broad statement in a 1989 USFWS Recovery Plan for the Mancos milk-vetch stating that acid 

deposition from power plants are a potential threat to the species. The document acknowledges that there is no data to 

suggest that acid deposition is an actual threat, but simply notes that there are power plants in the area and acid 

deposition can affect plants. 

I am not sure if anything will come up with those specific terms. If not, then we could try and broaden the search a 

little. 

Maybe “acid uptake” (or “acid deposition”) and “milk vetch” ? 

I am hoping to close the loop on by next Wednesday, May 14, but my schedule is somewhat flexible. Is that doable? 

Thank you very much! 

Anita 
2

Anita Lee, PhD 

Environmental Scientist 

US EPA, Air Division, Planning Office (Air-2) 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

(415) 972-3958
**Exhibit 32.2.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.(the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: February 22, 2008
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header History
 You are here: Census.gov ›
  History ›
  Programs › Agriculture Skip top of page navigation
 History Main
      Agency History
        Director Biographies
          Census Facilities
          Suitland, MD
          Notable Alumni
      Innovations
        Data Collection
          Technology
      Programs
        Agriculture
          Demographic
          Housing
          Economic
          Geography
          Governments
      Through the Decades
        Fast Facts
          Overview
          Index of Questions
          Questionnaires
          Census Instructions
      Genealogy
        Decennial Census Records
          Other Resources
      Reference
        Data@Museums
          Artifacts
          Lesson Plans
          Legislation
          Maps
          Oral Histories
          Privacy & Confidentiality
          Apportionment
          Publications
 Home Page Archive
        2024
          2023
          2022
          2021
          2020
          2019
          2018
          2017
          2016
          2015
          2014    
      FAQs
        Genealogy
          Agency History
          Demographic
          Economic
          Governments
          Agriculture
          Geography
          Innovations
          Miscellaneous
  In this Section: Census of Agriculture
  Title 7, Chapter 55
 Agriculture The United States has collected data on the nation's agriculture since U.S. marshals inquired about families' agricultural pursuits in 1820. Over the next 190 years, the census of agriculture grew to reflect changes in American agriculture, including types and uses of machinery, irrigation, and fertilizer.  The census of agriculture also incorporated changes and innovations pioneered by other censuses, including the use of electronic tabulation in 1900, statistical sampling in the 1940s, and the collection of Hispanic-origin data beginning in 1978.  Fayette County, WV, FarmFeeding chickens on a Fayette County, WV, farm in the 1930s.Photo courtesy of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
For the Docket

Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters Docket ID No. OW - 2009 - 0596 Meeting with Representatives from Mosaic and counsel September 8, 2010 In Attendance: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

– Ephraim King, OST Jim Keating , OST Mosaic

– James Voyles Arnold & Porter, LLP

– Jerem y Karpatkin

Lest er Sotsky Summary : Mosaic requested the meeting to discuss the Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters ; S upplemental Notice of Data Availability and Request for Comment (SNODA) , published in August 2010. Specifically , Mosaic provided comments on:

 Proposed criteria for the Bone Valley  Scientific defensibility of the proposed criteria in the SNODA  Timing and schedule of the rulemaking process and subsequent implementation phase  Procedure for Site
- specific Alternative Criteria (SSACs )  The effect of the criteria on permits  Opportunity

for public and stakeholder involvement in the implementation process EPA did not provide any

information about EPA positions regarding addressing comments received or possible final rule requirements.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gerald PARKER.

No. 62561.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Gerald Parker applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. It is ordered that relator be furnished with a transcript of any of the proceedings in this matter with leave to file additional assignments of error with the trial court for review by this Court.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header History
 You are here: Census.gov ›
  History ›
  FAQs › Economic FAQs Skip top of page navigation
 History Main
      Agency History
        Director Biographies
          Census Facilities
          Suitland, MD
          Notable Alumni
      Innovations
        Data Collection
          Technology
      Programs
        Agriculture
          Demographic
          Housing
          Economic
          Geography
          Governments
      Through the Decades
        Fast Facts
          Overview
          Index of Questions
          Questionnaires
          Census Instructions
      Genealogy
        Decennial Census Records
          Other Resources
      Reference
        Data@Museums
          Artifacts
          Lesson Plans
          Legislation
          Maps
          Oral Histories
          Privacy & Confidentiality
          Apportionment
          Publications
 Home Page Archive
        2024
          2023
          2022
          2021
          2020
          2019
          2018
          2017
          2016
          2015
          2014    
      FAQs
        Genealogy
          Agency History
          Demographic
          Economic
          Governments
          Agriculture
          Geography
          Innovations
          Miscellaneous
  In this Section: Has a census ever been canceled?
  When was the first economic census?
  When was Puerto Rico first included in a census of the United States?
  When is the economic census conducted?
  When did the U.S. Census Bureau begin using NAICS?
  When was the economic census first taken separately from the decennial census?
 Economic FAQs The United States has measured its economy since the 1810 census when the first questions about manufacturers and the goods they produced were asked at the time U.S. Marshals collected population data.  For the first time in 1905, the census of manufactures was taken separately from the population census.  In the years that followed, the collection of economic data grew in response to war, economic downturns, and the emergence of new industries. The questions to the left are a few of those frequently asked about the history of the U.S. Census Bureau's economic data collection programs. census employeesThe amount of economic and demographic data collected by the Census Bureau kept thousands of employees, like these key punch operators, busy year-round.
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Carey LAW, Appellee.

No. 73-1026.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 10, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IRIDIUM
WORLD COMMUNICATIONS LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001035442
<NAME> IRIDIUM WORLD COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       246,102
<OTHER-SE>                                    (88,808)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,294
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (69,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (69,974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (69,974)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.70)
        

</TABLE>
#### Edwinna Watford PAUL, Appellant, v. Millard PAUL, Appellee.

No. R-176.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 1, 1973.

Thomas F. Woods, of Woods & Johnston, Tallahassee, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal herein and the brief of appellant having been fully considered, and it appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the judgment appealed is erroneous, the said judgment is therefore affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.