alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MELLON PARTICIPATING MORTGAGE TRUST
                       COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES SERIES 85/10

                 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
                              DECLARATION OF TRUST


     AMENDMENT  NO. 1 (the  "Amendment")  to the  Second  Amended  and  Restated
Declaration  of Trust  (the  "Declaration  of  Trust")  of MELLON  PARTICIPATING
MORTGAGE TRUST COMMERCIAL  PROPERTIES  SERIES 85/10 (the "Trust") dated February
6, 1985, made at Atlanta,  Georgia this 13th day of March,  1996 by the Board of
Trustees hereunder.

     WHEREAS,  the third  paragraph of Section 1.1 of the  Declaration  of Trust
provides,  among other things,  that upon receipt of a written request by Mellon
Bank Corporation ("Mellon"),  the Trustees shall change the name of the Trust to
a name that does not contain the name "Mellon."

     WHEREAS,  Section 9.3 of the  Declaration of Trust provides that actions by
the Trustees  pursuant to the third  paragraph of Section 1.1 of the Declaration
of Trust  that  result in  amending  the  Declaration  of Trust may be  effected
without the vote or consent of any shareholder of the Trust;

     WHEREAS,  Mellon  has  requested  that  the  Trust no  longer  use the name
"Mellon" in the Trust's name; and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees desires to amend the Declaration of Trust to
change  the  name  of  the  Trust  from  "Mellon  Participating  Mortgage  Trust
Commercial Properties Series 85/10" to "Vinings Investment Properties Trust";

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  the undersigned,  being all the Trustees of the Trust, do
hereby state:

     1. In accordance with Sections 1.1 and 9.3 of the Declaration of Trust,

          (a) The first  sentence of the first  paragraph  of Section 1.1 of the
     Declaration of Trust is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

               "This  Trust  created  by this  Declaration  of Trust  is  herein
          referred  to as the  "Trust"  and shall be known by the name  "Vinings
          Investment Properties Trust."

          (b) All references to "Mellon Participating  Mortgage Trust Commercial
     Properties Series 85/10" (or any similar words) in the Declaration of Trust
     shall  hereafter  be  deemed  to  be  references  to  "Vinings   Investment
     Properties Trust."

     2. This Amendment may executed in separate  counterparts,  each of which so
executed and delivered  shall be an original,  but all such  counterparts  shall
together constitute one and the same instrument.

         EXECUTED as of the 13th day of March, 1996.


   TRUSTEES



 /s/ Peter D. Anzo
 -----------------
 Peter D. Anzo


 /s/ Martin H. Petersen
 ----------------------
 Martin H. Petersen


 /s/ Stephanie A. Reed
 ---------------------
 Stephanie A. Reed


 /s/ Gilbert H. Watts, Jr.
 -------------------------
 Gilbert H. Watts, Jr.


 /s/ Phill D. Greenblatt
 -----------------------
 Phill D. Greenblatt
#### Shannon HARRISON and S. Gordon Reese v. LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY.

No. 53506.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: Shannon Harrison and S. Gordon Reese applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 274 So.2d 785.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | this annual report on Form 20-F of BT Group plc fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BT Group plc.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 23, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Ian Livingston             
|                   |  |  |  | Name: Ian Livingston           
|                   |  |  |  | Title:   Chief Executive       
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 23, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Tony Chanmugam             
|                   |  |  |  | Name: Tony Chanmugam           
|                   |  |  |  | Title:   Group Finance Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MIDWEST EXPRESS HOLDINGS, INC. AS OF
AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         6,246
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,530
<ALLOWANCES>                                   246
<INVENTORY>                                    4,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32,293
<PP&E>                                         279,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                 86,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          88,755
<BONDS>                                        3,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       145
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,786
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               98,881
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  87,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (3)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,262
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,103
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .50
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50678

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ABEL HUMBERTO SERRANO-GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-78-ALL

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Abel Humberto

Serrano-Gomez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
#### Sal AIUPPA, Petitioner, v. Maynard SWANSON, Judge of County Court of Pinellas County, Respondent.

No. 74-116.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 5, 1974.

Prohibition denied.
262 La. 968

#### Sterling J. CARDON v. Victor J. DAUTERIVE and the St. Bernard Parish Democratic Executive Committee.

No. 52663.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 19, 1972.

In re: Victor J. Dauterive applying for writs of certiorari and/or review. 264 So.2d 806.

, Writs refused. The showing made is unsufficient to warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs.

The result reached by the Court of Appeal is correct, but Crothers v. Jones, 239 La. 800, 120 So.2d 248 is not distinguishable in law from the present case. However, in my opinion the holding in that case is in error. “[Cjonvicted of any crime which may be punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary” in former Art. 8, Section 6, La. Constitution — should have been construed to mean any conviction in any court in any state which is also a felony in Louisiana, i. e. punishable by imprisonment at hard labor, “the penitentiary.”
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Video Display Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities,
particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date:
June 12, 2007
    
    /s/ Ronald D Ordway

Ronald D OrdwayActing Chief Financial Officer
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  

               Fourth Quarter:  2003 and 2004



                                          90-percent

                     Fourth  Fourth   confidence interval<font size="-1">(+/-)</font><sup>a</sup>

Age of householder   Quarter Quarter 

                      2003    2004  of 2004 rate  of difference



United States.....     68.6    69.2     0.2           0.4



    Under 25 years     22.8    25.9     0.9           1.3

    25 to 29 years     40.6    40.1     0.9           1.3

    30 to 34 years     57.3    58.0     0.9           1.2

    35 to 39 years     66.2    67.0     0.8           1.1

    40 to 44 years     71.6    72.7     0.7           1.0

    45 to 49 years     76.0    76.0     0.7           1.0

    50 to 54 years     78.6    78.9     0.7           1.0

    55 to 59 years     80.8    81.2     0.7           1.0

    60 to 64 years     82.1    82.0     0.8           1.1

    65 to 69 years     82.3    82.9     0.9           1.3

    70 to 74 years     82.2    83.3     0.9           1.3

    75 years and o     79.3    78.0     0.7           1.0



      Under 35 years   42.7    43.3     0.5           0.8

      35 to 44 years   69.0    70.0     0.5           0.8

      45 to 54 years   77.2    77.4     0.5           0.7

      55 to 64 years   81.3    81.6     0.5           0.8

      65 years 

             and over  80.8    80.5     0.5           0.7

a\A 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliablilty.  The 

larger the confidence interval is, in relation to the size of the estimate, the less 

reliable the estimate.
August 12, 2003 Page of Revised INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P030567 Assessor: Flessner ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number ofRelease Sites: . Release Activity: Manufacturing 1 Release Description: WATER LANDFILL 1NCINEF. LADINCI FUGITIVE 

### TotalReleases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr:363. Per SiteRelease: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:

Ri, 11INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

-- Page of CASE NUMBER: P030567INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of CASE NUMBER: P030567INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page Of CASE NUMBER:P030567Page of INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CaseNumber: P030567 Assessor: ENVIRONENAL RELEASES Scenario#: 2 Number ofRelease Sites: Release Activity. Manufacturing 2 lease Descriptio;%: WA-TER LANDFILL .ICIE L......I .UIT Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kglyr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

### ReleaseDays/yr: 

# [ [7

. Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kglyr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT --- Page of CASE NUMBER: P030567INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of CASE NUMBER: P030567Page of INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CaseNumber: P030567 Assessor:

.. ENVIR.ONMENTAL, RELEASES. Scenario#: 3 Number ofRelease Sites: Release Activity: Processing la eaweDese I tOn" WATE LANDMIL INCMNE LANDThNCIN FUIIVE 

### TotalReleases: 

# I (kglyr) (kglyr) (kglyr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

### ReleaseDays/yr: 

# [

Per SiteRelease: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kglyr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIALREVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

-- Page of CASE NUMBER: P030567INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page Of CASE NUMBER: P030567INITIALREVIEW EXPOSURE REPORTPae o Case Number: P030567 Assessor: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES. Scenanio#: 4 Number ofRelease Sites: Release Activity: Processing lb klase D UritOuM WATER LANIWIL NIE ADJCN FGT 

### TotalReleases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kglyr) (kg/yr) (kglyr) 

### Release Days/yr: 

# [ [

. Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kgfyr) (kglyr) (kglyr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIALREVIEWEXPOSURE REPORT

-- Page Of CASE NUMBER: P030567INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of CASE NUMBER: P030567
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  Third Quarter 1999 and 1998




                                     Third      Third     Standard    Standard
Area                                quarter    quarter    error on    error on
                                     1999       1998     1999 rate  difference

United States.....................      67.0       66.8        0.2         0.2

  Inside MAs......................      64.9       64.8        0.2         0.3
   In central cities..............      50.5       50.5        0.3         0.5
   Not in central cities (suburbs)      73.7       73.8        0.2         0.3
  Outside MAs.....................      75.8       75.0        0.4         0.5

 Northeast........................      63.6       63.4        0.4         0.6
 Midwest..........................      72.1       71.7        0.4         0.5
 South............................      69.3       68.8        0.3         0.4
 West.............................      60.8       61.1        0.4         0.5
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Smart-tek

Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,2005 as filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Donald Gee, Chief Executive

Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section

13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Donald Gee

---------------------------

Donald Gee

Chief Executive Officer

November 17, 2005
#### Percy PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 24, 1968.

Percy Payne, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender *41to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       17
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2435
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               56
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2435
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5655
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4913
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4913
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    422
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    45.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    45.84
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Eddie D. Canterbury, certifythat:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Logan County Bancshares, Inc.

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)              presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of  the disclosure controls and procedures basedon our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of  registrant’s board of directors (orpersons   performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to report, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annualreport whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in otherfactors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to thedate  of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 
| Date: | April 14,  2004 |   | /s/ Eddie D.  Canterbury |   | President  & CEO |   |
|-------|-----------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|

 

----