alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 

                  for Inside and Outside MAs:  Second Quarter 1997 and 1996



(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)



                                                     Second quarter 1997

Type of housing unit

                                              United     Inside    Outside

                                              States       MAs        MAs



All housing units.........................       100        100        100



    Year-round vacant.....................       8.9        8.5       10.6

      For rent............................       2.6        2.8        2.1

      For sale only.......................       1.0        0.9        1.1

      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.8        0.7

      Held off market.....................       4.6        4.0        6.7

        For occasional use................       1.7        1.3        2.8

        Temporarily occupied by persons

        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.8

        For other reasons.................       2.1        1.8        3.1



    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.9        1.6        7.5



    Occupied..............................      88.2       89.9       81.9





                                                     Second quarter 1996

Type of housing unit

                                              United   Inside     Outside

                                              States     MAs        MAs



All housing units.........................       100        100        100



    Year-round vacant.....................       8.7        8.2       10.7

      For rent............................       2.6        2.7        2.2

      For sale only.......................       0.9        0.8        1.2

      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..       0.8        0.8        0.8

      Held off market.....................       4.5        3.9        6.6

        For occasional use................       1.5        1.1        2.8

        Temporarily occupied by persons

        with usual residence elsewhere....       0.8        0.8        0.7

        For other reasons.................       2.2        2.0        3.0



    Seasonal vacant.......................       2.8        1.5        7.4



    Occupied..............................      88.5       90.3       81.9

    

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00561

- CV
CITY OF WESLACO, TEXAS

v. CHRISTOPHER DE LEON, D/B/A DE LEON AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL

On Appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 2190

- 20

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in accordance with its opin ion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 25, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INCOME
STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                           3,399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,329
<INVENTORY>                                     31,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,517
<PP&E>                                         227,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,406
<BONDS>                                         56,955
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,379
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   243,778
<SALES>                                        325,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               325,289
<CGS>                                          228,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    90
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,978
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,858
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,120
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,120
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52


</TABLE>
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  Second Quarter 2004 and 2005

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   Second Quarter 2004

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.8       7.9       8.7      12.6       7.7
      For rent...........................      3.1       2.3       3.1       3.7       2.7
      For sale only......................      1.0       0.6       1.2       1.3       0.8
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.9       0.8       0.9       0.9       0.8
      Held off market....................      4.8       4.2       3.5       6.7       3.4
        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.3       0.6       2.4       1.5
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.9       0.8       1.1       0.6
        For other reasons................      2.3       2.0       2.1       3.2       1.2

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.3       4.5       3.1       3.0       2.9

    Occupied.............................     86.9      87.6      88.3      84.4      89.4



                                                   Second Quarter 2005


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.7       7.7       9.2      11.9       8.1
      For rent...........................      3.0       2.0       3.4       3.4       2.7
      For sale only......................      1.1       0.8       1.3       1.3       0.8
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.9       0.9       0.8       0.9       0.8
      Held off market....................      4.7       3.9       3.6       6.2       3.8
        For occasional use...............      1.6       1.1       0.7       2.1       1.9
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.9       0.8       1.1       0.7
        For other reasons................      2.2       2.0       2.1       3.0       1.2

    Seasonal vacant......................      3.2       4.4       3.1       2.9       2.6

    Occupied.............................     87.2      87.9      87.7      85.2      89.2
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Barry
C. Kaye, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Coates International, Ltd., certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coates International, Ltd. (the
"Company");





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and I
have:





(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and





(c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and to
the audit committee of the Company's board of directors:





(a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and





6. I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.




Dated:
      August 11, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Barry
      C. KayeBarry
      C. KayeTreasurer,
      Chief Financial Officerand
      Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,114,934
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      11,282,997
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,151,093)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,448,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,871,684
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,448,454
<SALES>                                      2,509,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,555,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,109,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             535,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT d/b/a Indian River Memorial Hospital, Appellant, v. Charles H. STRAWDER, Appellee.

No. 69-211.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 7, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (Amounts in Thousands, Except Ratios)
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        Nine Months
                                                                                    Ended September 30,
                                                                                 -------------------------
                                                                                    1996            1997
                                                                                  ---------      ---------
<S>                                                                               <C>            <C>      
Income before income taxes ................................................       $ 304,802      $ 369,971

Add (deduct) distributions greater (less) than
     income of unconsolidated affiliates .................................          (1,866)        (2,744)

Fixed charges from below ..................................................          43,116         42,121


Capitalized interest included in fixed charges ............................            (124)        (1,551)
                                                                                  ---------      ---------


          Earnings available for fixed charges ............................       $ 345,928      $ 407,797
                                                                                  =========      =========



Fixed charges:
     Interest expense, including amortization of debt expense/discount ....       $  37,976      $  35,649
     Portion of rentals representing an interest factor ...................           5,016          5,101
     Interest capitalized .................................................             124          1,551
                                                                                  ---------      ---------

          Total fixed charges .............................................       $  43,116      $  42,121
                                                                                  =========      =========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................................             8.0            9.7
                                                                                  =========      =========
</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137022 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137022 

 COA: 277796 

Kent CC: 05-012604-FC 

MATTHEW LEE ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
#### COMMERCIAL CREDIT BUSINESS LOANS INC., Appellant, v. MORETRENCH CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-783.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 7, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,690
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      660
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,193
<PP&E>                                          44,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,813
<SALES>                                         38,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,723
<CGS>                                            9,511
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,558
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,558
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
#### John B. HOSKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 67-179, 67-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 12, 1968.

*146Engel & Pollack and Jack J. Taffer, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence after a jury verdict, for the crime of rape.

He claims reversible error was committed by the trial court in not suppressing an oral statement made after his arrest to a police officer. We find no error in this regard. See Narro v. United States, 370 F.2d 329 (5th Cir.1966).

He further argues that his arrest was illegal and that the trial court should have suppressed from evidence a beige hose stocking found on him when he was searched.

The record shows that the officer initially informed the appellant that the arrest was “for prowling”. The record reflects there was probable cause for an arrest of the appellant herein and an improper label will not make an arrest illegal which was based on probable cause. Chippas v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 180 So.2d 355; Ralph v. Pepersack, 335 F.2d 128 (4th Cir. 1964); Bell v. United States, 102 U.S. App.D.C. 383, 254 F.2d 82 (1958).

The appellant also seeks reversal because the trial court failed to give an instruction to the jury of the weight to be given by it to the appellant’s confession. He did not seek such an instruction at trial and, therefore, reversible error was not committed in this regard, Fla.Stat. § 918.10(4), F.S.A. See also Hamilton v. State, Fla.App.1963, 152 So.2d 793.

Error is claimed in that the trial judge did not explicitly determine whether the statement of the defendant was voluntarily given before admitting it into evidence. The voluntariness of the confession was properly determined. See Sims v. State of Georgia, 385 U.S. 538, 87 S.Ct. 639, 17 L.Ed.2d 593 (1967); Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964); Brown v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 578; Rollins v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 179 So.2d 377.

Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Barrick Gold Corporation (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report).

I, Gregory C. Wilkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906
of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | a) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                          
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | b) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ GREGORY C. WILKINS
Name: Gregory C. Wilkins
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### ROBEY v. CHAMBERLAIN.

No. 36487.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 199 So.2d 153.
S. 1499 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 278 Main 

Street in Chadron, Nebraska, as the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT CORY MRACEK MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 278 Main Street in Chadron, Nebraska, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.