Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 37437 

1PM2.5 refers to particulate matter of 2.5 microns 

or less in diameter, often referred to as ‘‘fine’’ 

particles. 

VERMONT NON-REGULATORY

Name of non-regulatory SIP provision 

Applicable 

geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State submittal 

date/effective 

date 

EPA 

approved 

date 

Explanations 

*******

Transport Element of the Infrastructure 

SIP for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS.

Statewide ................ 11/2/2015 8/1/2018 

[Insert Federal 

Register 

citation] 

Approved submittal meets the requirements of Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for 

the 2010 SO2 NAAQS 

* * * * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2018–16413 Filed 7–31–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0065; FRL–9979– 

40—Region 1] 

Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; 

Infrastructure State Implementation 

Plan Requirements; Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration Permit 

Program Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving elements of 

a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

submission from Connecticut regarding 

the infrastructure requirements of the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2012 

fine particle (PM2.5) National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), and a 

SIP submission addressing interstate 

transport requirements of the CAA for 

the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. In addition, we 

are approving one statute included in 

the SIP for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The 

infrastructure requirements are designed 

to ensure that the structural components 

of each state’s air quality management 

program are adequate to meet the state’s 

responsibilities under the CAA. The 

EPA is also approving revisions to the 

SIP submitted by Connecticut on 

October 18, 2017, satisfying 

Connecticut’s earlier commitment to 

adopt and submit provisions that meet 

certain requirements of the federal 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

(PSD) permit program. In addition, we 

are converting the June 3, 2016 

conditional approval to full approval for 

elements of Connecticut’s infrastructure 

SIP regarding PSD requirements to treat 

nitrogen oxides (NOX) as a precursor to 

ozone and to establish a minor source 

baseline date for PM2.5 emissions for the 

1997 and 2006 PM2.5, 1997 and 2008 

ozone, 2008 lead, 2010 nitrogen dioxide, 

and 2010 sulfur dioxide NAAQS. This 

action is being taken under the Clean 

Air Act. 

DATES: This rule is effective on August 

31, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR– 

2017–0065. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the https://

www.regulations.gov website. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available at https://

www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 

New England Regional Office, Office of 

Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality 

Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square— 

Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests 

that if at all possible, you contact the 

contact listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alison C. Simcox, Air Quality Unit, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 

New England Regional Office, 5 Post 

Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail code 

OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, tel. 

(617) 918–1684; simcox.alison@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Background and Purpose 

II. Response to Comments 

III. Final Action 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background and Purpose 

On March 19, 2018 (83 FR 11933), 

EPA published a Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of 

Connecticut. The NPRM proposed 

approval of three formal SIP 

submissions from the Connecticut 

Department of Energy and 

Environmental Protection (CT DEEP). 

These included a SIP revision 

addressing the ‘‘Good Neighbor’’ (or 

‘‘transport’’) (Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of 

the CAA) provisions for the 2006 PM2.5 1

NAAQS submitted on August 19, 2011, 

and an infrastructure SIP (including the 

transport provisions) for the 2012 PM2.5

NAAQS submitted on December 14, 

2015. In addition, on October 18, 2017, 

CT DEEP submitted a SIP revision 

addressing applicable requirements for 

the PSD permit program in Part C of the 

CAA that are codified in 40 CFR 51.166. 

This rulemaking does not cover three 

substantive areas that are not integral to 

acting on a state’s infrastructure SIP 

submission: (i) Existing provisions 

related to excess emissions during 

periods of start-up, shutdown, or 

malfunction at sources (‘‘SSM’’ 

emissions) that may be contrary to the 

CAA and EPA’s policies addressing 

such excess emissions; (ii) existing 

provisions related to ‘‘director’s 

variance’’ or ‘‘director’s discretion’’ that 

purport to permit revisions to SIPapproved emissions limits with limited 

public process or without requiring 

further approval by EPA, that may be 

contrary to the CAA (‘‘director’s 

discretion’’); and, (iii) existing 

provisions for Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) programs that may 

be inconsistent with current 

requirements of EPA’s ‘‘Final New 

Source Review (NSR) Improvement 

Rule,’’ 67 FR 80186 (December 31, 

2002), as amended by 72 FR 32526 (June 

13, 2007) (‘‘NSR Reform’’). Instead, EPA 

has the authority to address each one of 

these substantive areas separately. A 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
37438 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 

detailed history, interpretation, and 

rationale for EPA’s approach to 

infrastructure SIP requirements can be 

found in EPA’s May 13, 2014, proposed 

rule entitled, ‘‘Infrastructure SIP 

Requirements for the 2008 Lead 

NAAQS’’ in the section, ‘‘What is the 

scope of this rulemaking?’’ See 79 FR 

27241 at 27242–45. 

The rationale for EPA’s proposed 

action is explained in the NPR and will 

not be restated here. 

II. Response to Comments 

EPA received 12 comments during the 

comment period, three of which are 

essentially identical. The nine distinct 

comments discuss subjects outside the 

scope of an infrastructure SIP action, do 

not explain (or provide a legal basis for) 

how the proposed action should differ 

in any way, and make no specific 

mention of the proposed action. As 

such, they are not germane. 

Only the three identical comments 

make direct reference to the proposed 

rule or to Connecticut’s SIP, but even 

these comments lack specificity and are 

unclear. They state that, ‘‘as much as the 

rule gives clear mandate and 

responsibility of the state in SIP [sic], it 

does not give out the responsibilities of 

other agencies and stakeholders in 

absolute terms.’’ The comments, 

however, provide no further explanation 

for this statement, such as articulating 

what particular ‘‘responsibilities’’ the 

SIP should, but does not currently, 

‘‘give out,’’ offering any ‘‘absolute 

terms’’ to be included, or providing any 

specifics regarding the ‘‘other agencies 

and stakeholders.’’ Moreover, it is not 

even clear that the commenter(s) 

opposes EPA’s proposed approval of 

Connecticut’s submittals. In short, most 

of the comments are not germane and 

none of them provide a cogent 

explanation of how the proposed action 

should differ in any way nor any 

relevant legal basis for any changes. 

Consequently, the comments require no 

further response, and we are finalizing 

the action as proposed. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is approving Connecticut’s 

infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2012 

PM2.5 NAAQS, as well as the transport 

provisions (CAA section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)) of the state’s 

infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2006 

PM2.5 NAAQS as revisions to the 

Connecticut SIP. EPA is also approving, 

into the Connecticut SIP, revisions to 

the PSD permit program pertaining to 

treating NOX as a precursor to ozone 

(RCSA Section 22a–174–3a(k)(1)(C)) and 

establishing a minor source baseline 

date for PM2.5 (RCSA Section 22a–174– 

1(71)). Additionally, EPA is approving 

revised CGS section 16a–21a, ‘‘Sulfur 

content of home heating oil and off-road 

diesel fuel. Suspension of requirements 

for emergency. Enforcement.’’ effective 

July 1, 2015. Finally, we are converting 

to full approval the June 3, 2016 

conditional approval of Connecticut’s 

infrastructure SIP submittals for the 

PSD-related requirements in section 

110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and J for the 1997 

and 2006 PM2.5, 1997 and 2008 ozone, 

2008 lead, 2010 nitrogen dioxide, and 

2010 sulfur dioxide NAAQS. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is finalizing the 

incorporation by reference of the 

General Statutes of Connecticut and 

state regulations described in the 

amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 

below. Specifically, EPA is finalizing 

the incorporation by reference of 

Connecticut General Statute Title 16a, 

Chapter 296, Section 16a–21a, and state 

regulations, namely the provisions at 

Regulation 22a–174–1(71) and at 22a– 

174–3a(k)(1)(C). The EPA has made, and 

will continue to make, these documents 

generally available through https://

www.regulations.gov and at the EPA 

Region 1 Office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• This action is not an Executive 

Order 13771 regulatory action because 

this action is not significant under 

Executive Order 12866. 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 37439 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by October 1, 2018. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: July 26, 2018. 

Alexandra Dunn, 

Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1. 

Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations is amended 

as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart H—Connecticut 

■ 2. Section 52.370 is amended by 

adding paragraphs (c)(103)(i)(C) and 

(c)(118) to read as follows: 

§ 52.370 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(103) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) Connecticut General Statute 

Section16a–21a, which was approved in 

paragraph (c)(103)(i)(B) of this section, 

is removed and replaced by Connecticut 

General Statute 16a–21a, see paragraph 

(c)(118)(i)(A) of this section. 

* * * * * 

(118) Revisions to the State 

Implementation Plan submitted by the 

Connecticut Department of Energy and 

Environmental Protection on August 19, 

2011, December 14, 2015, and October 

18, 2017. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 

‘‘Definitions,’’ Regulation 22a–174– 

1(71), the definition of ‘‘Minor source 

baseline date,’’ amended October 5, 

2017. 

(B) ‘‘Permit to Construct and Operate 

Stationary Sources,’’ Regulation 22a– 

174–3a(k)(1)(C), amended October 5, 

2017. 

(C) Connecticut General Statute, Title 

16a, ‘‘Planning and Energy Policy,’’ 

Chapter 296, ‘‘Operation of Fuel Supply 

Business,’’ Section 16a–21a, ‘‘Sulfur 

content of home heating oil and off-road 

diesel fuel. Suspension of requirements 

for emergency. Enforcement,’’ effective 

July 1, 2015, as published in the State 

of Connecticut General Statutes, 

Revision of 1958, Revised to January 1, 

2017. 

(ii) Additional materials. (A) The 

Connecticut Department of Energy and 

Environmental Protection document, 

‘‘Addendum to the CAA 

§ 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) Portion of 

Connecticut’s Infrastructure Submittal 

for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS,’’ August 19, 

2011. 

(B) The Connecticut Department of 

Energy and Environmental Protection 

document, ‘‘Connecticut State 

Implementation Plan for Clean Air Act 

Section 110(a) Infrastructure Elements: 

2012 PM2.5 NAAQS,’’ December 14, 

2015. 

(C) The Connecticut Department of 

Energy and Environmental Protection 

document, State Implementation Plan 

Revision Concerning the Consumer 

Products, Architectural and Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings and Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration Permit 

Programs,’’ October 18, 2017. 

§ 52.380 [Amended] 

■ 3. Section 52.380 is amended by: 

■ a. Under paragraph (e)(2), removing 

the text ‘‘Note 1 to paragraphs (f) 

through (h)’’ and adding in its place 

‘‘Note 1 to paragraphs (f) through (g)’’; 

and 

■ b. Removing and reserving paragraph 

(h). 

■ 4. In § 52.385, Table 52.385 is 

amended by adding entries for state 

citations 22a–174–1 and 22a–174–3a in 

numerical order by state citation and 

date approved by EPA and revising the 

entry for state citation Section 16a–21a 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.385 EPA-approved Connecticut 

regulations. 

* * * * * 

TABLE 52.385—EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS

Connecticut 

state citation Title/subject 

Dates Federal 

Register 

citation 

Section 

52.370 

Comments/ 

Date adopted description 

by state 

Date approved 

by EPA 

*******

22a–174–1 ..... Definitions ........................... 10/05/17 08/01/17 [Insert Federal Register citation].c (118) Modified definition of ‘‘minor 

source baseline date’’ for 

purposes of adding 

PM2.5. 

* * * * * * * 

22a–174–3a ... Permit to Construct and Operate Stationary Sources.10/05/17 08/01/17 [Insert Federal Register citation].c (118) Amendment of subsection 

(k)(1)(C). 

* * * * * * * 

Connecticut 

General 

Statutes 

Section 16a– 

21a.

Sulfur content of home 

heating oil and off road 

diesel fuel. Suspension of 

requirements for emergency. Enforcement.

07/01/15 08/01/17 [Insert Federal Register citation].c (118) Allowable sulfur content of 

fuels provided. Criteria for 

suspension of requirements and for enforcement identified. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
37440 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 

TABLE 52.385—EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS—Continued 

Connecticut 

state citation Title/subject 

Dates Federal 

Register 

citation 

Section 

52.370 

Comments/ 

Date adopted description 

by state 

Date approved 

by EPA 

*******

■ 5. Section 52.386 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c) to read as follows: 

§ 52.386 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure 

requirements. 

* * * * * 

(c) The Connecticut Department of 

Energy and Environmental Protection 

submitted the following infrastructure 

SIPs on these dates: 2006 PM2.5

NAAQS—August 19, 2011 (CAA section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) transport provisions), 

and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS—December 14, 

2015. These infrastructure SIPs are 

approved. Also with respect to the 1997 

and 2006 PM2.5, 1997 and 2008 ozone, 

2008 lead, 2010 nitrogen dioxide, and 

2010 sulfur dioxide NAAQS, elements 

related to PSD, which are in CAA 

section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and (J) 

and were previously conditionally 

approved, are now approved. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16431 Filed 7–31–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0150; FRL–9980–39] 

Titanium dioxide; Exemption From the 

Requirement of a Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation amends the 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of titanium 

dioxide (CAS Reg. No. 13463–67–7) 

when used as an inert ingredient in 

pesticide formulations applied to 

growing crops to allow for use as a 

carrier. SciReg. Inc., on behalf of Bayer 

CropScience Biologics GmbH, submitted 

a petition to EPA under the Federal 

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 

requesting establishment of an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance. This regulation eliminates the 

need to establish a maximum 

permissible level for residues of 

titanium dioxide resulting from this use. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

August 1, 2018. Objections and requests 

for hearings must be received on or 

before October 1, 2018, and must be 

filed in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0150, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Goodis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 

20460–0001; main telephone number: 

(703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 

through the Government Printing 

Office’s e-CFR site at http://

www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/ 

40tab_02.tpl. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2018–0150 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before October 1, 2018. Addresses for 

mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2018–0150, by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES