alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 149 (Thursday, August 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 37831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 2, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
July 27, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 457 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-201, CP2018-
279.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-16521 Filed 8-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1695 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1695

   To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as 
                              wilderness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 2013

Ms. Cantwell (for herself and Mr. Kirk) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as 
                              wilderness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PORTION OF ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AS 
              WILDERNESS.

    Section 4 of the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act 
of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(p) Designation of Certain Land as Wilderness.--Notwithstanding 
any other provision of this Act, a portion of the Arctic National 
Wildlife Refuge in Alaska comprising approximately 1,559,538 acres, as 
generally depicted on a map entitled `Arctic National Wildlife Refuge--
1002 Area. Alternative E--Wilderness Designation, October 28, 1991' and 
available for inspection in the offices of the Secretary, is designated 
as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System under the 
Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
Abatement Order filed August 26, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00021-CV

IN RE JLG INDUSTRIES, INC., OSHKOSH CORPORATION AND 

SUNBELT RENTALS, INC., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

412th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 94538-CV

ABATEMENT ORDER

On March 5, 2021, the parties to this original proceeding notified the Court 

that the parties had reached a settlement. On August 11, 2021, the Court requested 

that the parties advise the Court of the status. Both parties responded on August 

23, 2021, and indicated that settlement efforts are on-going. Accordingly, we issue 

the following order.
2

This original proceeding is abated, treated as a closed proceeding, and 

removed from this Court’s active docket until November 1, 2021. The original 

proceeding will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket at that time, or when the 

parties file a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the original proceeding filed by 

any party, or the Court may reinstate the original proceeding on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         407,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,509,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                    76,187
<INVENTORY>                                    762,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,846,113
<PP&E>                                         232,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,402,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,888,096
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    260,000
<COMMON>                                     7,876,826
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,148,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,402,680
<SALES>                                      4,391,184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,391,184
<CGS>                                        1,636,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,636,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,949,646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                780,904
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,165
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            779,739
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   779,739
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IRIDIUM
OPERATING LLC'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001051721
<NAME> IRIDIUM OPERATING LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         195,443
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                       126
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               219,107
<PP&E>                                       4,278,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                 865,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,719,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,241,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,401,011
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,186,884)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,719,038
<SALES>                                          1,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,451
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               387,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (505,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (505,321)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (505,321)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Jamie S. HARMON, Appellant, v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT of the State of Florida, and Johnnie Jefferson Hicks, Appellees.

No. 2632.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 4, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
Table B-2.  Standard Errors of Estimated Percentages for Characteristics of Vacant Rental and Homeowner
                    Housing Units:  2001



                                    Estimated percentage

                               1 or     2 or     5 or    10 or    15 or    20 or    25 or
                                 99       98       95       90       85       80       75       50


Vacant rental units........     0.1      0.2      0.3      0.4      0.5      0.6      0.6      0.7
Vacant homeowner units.....     0.2      0.3      0.4      0.6      0.7      0.8      0.9      1.0
#### Marilyn Kay THAL, a free dealer, Appellant, v. Ruth E. FEEMSTER, as Executrix under the Last Will and Testament of Robert M. Feemster, Deceased, Appellee. Sidney PAVILACK et al., Appellants, v. Ruth E. FEEMSTER, as Executrix under the Last Will and Testament of Robert M. Feemster, Deceased, Appellee.

Nos. 71-785, 71-1001, 71-993.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 16, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeals dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              19
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      466
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1142
<PP&E>                                           10826
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1411
<BONDS>                                           7000
<COMMON>                                            40
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             7500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7082
<SALES>                                           1112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1112
<CGS>                                              721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (258)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (518)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### F. William MENGE, Appellant, v. Robert L. BROWN, Sr., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1183.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 14, 1973.

Gordon H. Harris, of Gray, Adams, Harris & Robinson, Orlando, for appellant.

August J. Stanton, Jr., of Colling, La-tham, Stanton & Sanders, Orlando, for appellee-Brown.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and on the basis thereof we are of the opinion that defendant, William Menge, has failed to demonstrate reversible error except as to that part of the final judgment awarding punitive damages, which finding is vacated. See Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. McRoberts, 1933, 111 Fla. 278, 149 So. 631. The final judgment is affirmed in'all other respects.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

WALDEN, CROSS, and MAGER, JJ, concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **CERTIFICATION OF    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**      I, William J. Gervais, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual    Report on Form    10-K of    Qualstar Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment does not contain    any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a    material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of    the circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this    amendment; and     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this amendment, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this amendment.    Date: October 27, 2006     /s/  WILLIAM    J.    GERVAISWilliam    J. Gervais
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,493
<INVENTORY>                                      3,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,256
<PP&E>                                          73,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                (26,955)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,185
<BONDS>                                         23,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           215
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,692
<SALES>                                         25,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,517
<CGS>                                         (17,199)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (25,892)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (104)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (663)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (991)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (991)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

     We have issued our report dated March 20, 2000, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference or included in the
Annual Report of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (formerly, Cooper Life Sciences, Inc.)
and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the two months ended December 31, 1999. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statement of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (formerly, Cooper Life
Sciences, Inc.) on Form S-8 (File No. 333-22287, effective February 25, 1997).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 20, 2000


                                       75
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1572 

To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to reimburse States that use State 

funds to operate National Parks during the Federal Government shutdown, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 15, 2013 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to reimburse States 

that use State funds to operate National Parks during 

the Federal Government shutdown, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting States, 

5 Opening National Parks Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1572 IS

1 SEC. 2. REIMBURSEMENT FOR COSTS TO STATES TO OPEN 

2 NATIONAL PARKS TO THE PUBLIC. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after 

4 funds are made available, the Secretary of the Treasury, 

5 using funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, 

6 and out of applicable corporate or other revenues, receipts, 

7 and funds, for the several departments, agencies, corpora8 tions, and other organizational units of government for the 

9 fiscal year 2014, shall reimburse any State for activities 

10 described in subsection (b). 

11 (b) ACTIVITIES ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT.— 

12 The Secretary of the Treasury shall reimburse States 

13 under subsection (a) for State funds expended for activi14 ties that meet all of the following criteria: 

15 (1) The activity was conducted in fiscal year 

16 2014 during a time when the Federal Government 

17 was not conducting that activity due to the partial 

18 shutdown of the Federal Government. 

19 (2) The activity was necessary to operate and 

20 open to the public a National Park located, in whole 

21 or in part, within the State. 

22 (3) The activity was authorized under Federal 

23 law. 

24 (4) The activity was conducted in a manner and 

25 at a level not substantially greater in scope or cost 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1572 IS

1 than how the activity would have been conducted by 

2 the Federal Government. 

3 (5) The activity is not a settlement of or de4 fense against a claim of liability on the part of the 

5 State. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 11657.

#### Hague et al., Exrs., et al. *v.*Hague et al.

Decided October 5, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Muskingum county.

*Mr. John R. Stonesipher*and *Mr. John J. Adams,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Winn & Bassett,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed:

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
10.8


 


Application
for shares


 


	To:	The
    directors
	 	DT
    Cloud Acquisition Corporation

    Company
    Number 392229

    (Company)



 


We,
[        ] of [        ] apply for the allotment and issue to us of the following fully paid shares (Shares) in the capital of the Company to
the amount of USD0.0001 per Share.


 


	Number
    of shares:	[          ]
	Class
    of shares:	Ordinary
	Amount
    payable per share:	USD0.0001
	Total
    payable	USD[          ]
    (Consideration)


 


If
this application is successful, we agree to pay the Company on demand the sum of USD[         ] payable as the Consideration.


 


Conditional
upon the allotment to us of the Shares, we request and authorise the Company to enter our name in the Company’s register of members
as the holder of the Shares.


 


We
confirm that we will hold the Shares on the terms of Company’s articles of association. We also confirm that the address we have
given will be our address recorded in the register of members and the address to which notices of meeting and other notices under the
Company’s articles of association are to be given.


 


In
addition, in the event of the Company’s initial public offering on a recognised stock exchange (the IPO) and the over-allotment
option granted to the underwriter(s) of the IPO is not exercised in full, we acknowledge and agree that the Company/we may forfeit any
and all rights of up to 225,000 Shares purchased and issued to us such that immediately following such forfeiture, we will own, in total,
an aggregate number of the ordinary shares (not including the ordinary shares underlying any private placement units or warrants or rights,
as the case may be, (whether comprised in any such units or standing alone) that may be issued to us upon exercise of any warrants or
any securities or rights purchased by us in the IPO or in the aftermarket) equal to 20% of the issued and outstanding ordinary shares
of the Company immediately following completion of the IPO. If any of the Shares are forfeited in accordance with this paragraph, then
after such time we shall no longer have any rights as a holder of such forfeited Shares, and the Company shall take such action as is
appropriate to redeem and cancel such forfeited Shares, which may include by way of the compulsory redemption and cancellation of such
Shares for nil consideration. In addition, we hereby irrevocably grant the Company a limited power of attorney for the purpose of effectuating
the foregoing and agree to take any and all action reasonably requested by the Company necessary to effect any adjustment in this paragraph
(including any such redemption as is referred to herein above).


 


Dated
[        ]


 


For
and on behalf of


[         ]


 


	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:
#### Charles A. PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-387.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 5, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Written Statement
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Midwest Express Holdings, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the Company),
hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Timothy E. HoeksemaTimothy E. HoeksemaChairman
of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert S. Bahlman Robert S. Bahlman
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2003

| | A
signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Johnny JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-881.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 8, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 8, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.