alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A1954. BRIDGES et al. v. AMS SERVICING, LLC et al.

An appeal in the captioned case was docketed in this Court on June 19, 2014.

The Appellants’ brief, including enumeration of errors, was due to be filed within 20

days after the case was docketed – no later than July 9, 2014. Court of Appeals Rules

22 (a); 23 (a). Appellants did not comply with the rules of this Court requiring that

a brief and enumeration of errors be filed within 20 days after the case was docketed,

nor did Appellants request an extension of time before expiration of the 20-day filing

deadline. Accordingly, the appeal in the captioned case is DISMISSED. Court of

Appeals Rule 23 (a).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/29/2014

July 29, 2014
. DEPARTMENT OF OOMMEROE AND LABOR-GUREAU OF THE CENBUB
THIRTEENTH OENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1910—POPULATION
TED PACE a hat

ee ee

‘cowry. (A Any

“Towne on otwen vwou oF covuty

Wai oem

van NAME OF NSTTUT

a
aa = ——— a oo 2
seearmmarecairate TE a ual moses REST Tt an ri
; ~ [roams Hl Ses | SS SS HAH
| sect | ieee 1
fe Fi egy eget pie ia dled 4
E dhe atch Vncediat a

ba
no

ee" taal j
11s

Historie census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the US. Consus Bureau.

ri ionteseennencerearsnmnetnn aan

ata eae | Be al “Vital Tpactad, Ean a hee
i Fis, th: [hie erg bench Phintede el Panam

| = a
a He patel lil x te ia ran pang ut_\ns
cd ew Beis | | | Tratdicd....| enced WE
« ara Pela Lien Pure 7 ma
| ie ied bse. ulna!
a Listed | thu | Fences. I a
a] ara Lushan
3 it é Whe
m Eat Dre. x
1” rete
boon vi avandia
bon fF Ment
eon Daas.
"| neterara aon
1s) Laret.
: ia
nl S| Dera
oT i| Ld
” enw Send
‘© lw V4 hex.
rs PW Theme
coe iH Hs re
ow i Micah aad |lele Been
| LE la! Is3) Von.
. rar Ze
® Far fen. cn
Pea] bal it Dons =
oa rahi |S ES A
com lw. wives
a Fetus Max Us
» fara Daerah Teme ST Vl
«| Eel Wa) aanracad sont ti: Boone | Uf
| Lust Masbisiak | ardoion Maid im
«| 15] W jab) are
" Ee ivi Du
* bral Wy TIL rn
* ay Sent] i
19) mrs hess.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39

                           [LETTERHEAD OF BANK EXIM]


                                $25,000,000.00

                                BANK GUARANTEE
                                --------------
                              NO **8/****-**/*/**


CURRENCY       :UNITED STATES DOLLARS
AMOUNT         :US$ 25,000,000.00 (US DOLLARS TWENTY FIVE MILLION)
ISSUED AT      :JAKARTA-INDONESIA
ISSUED DATE    :OCTOBER 21, 1998
MATURITY DATE  :OCTOBER 21, 2000

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, WE THE UNDERSIGNED, PT. BANK EKSPOR IMPOR INDONESIA
(PERSERO) JAKARTA PLAZA EXIM BRANCH, JL. JEND GATOT SUBROTO KAV. 36-38
INDONESIA, HEREBY ISSUE OUR IRREVOCABLE, UNCONDITIONAL, TRANSFERABLE DIVISIBLE
AND WITHOUT PROTEST OR NOTIFICATION PROMISE TO PAY AGAINST THIS BANK GUARANTEE
TO THE ORDER OF **** **** THE BEARER OR HOLDER THERE OF WILL BE PAID AT MATURITY
OCTOBER 21, 1998 TO OCTOBER 21, 2000 THE SUM OF US$ 25,000,000.00 (US DOLLARS
TWENTY FIVE MILLION) IN THE LAWFUL CURRENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

UPON PRESENTATION AND SURRENDER OF THIS BANK GUARANTEE AT THE OFFICE OF PT. BANK
EKSPOR IMPOR INDONESIA (PERSERO), PLAZA EXIM BRANCH JL. JEND. GATOT SUBROTO
KAV. 36-38 JAKARTA-INDONESIA SUCH PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT SET OFF AND
CLEAR OFF ANY DEDUCTIONS OR CHARGES, FEES OR DEDUCTION OR WITHHOLDING OF ANY
NATURE NOW OR HEREAFTER IMPOSED OR LEVIED, COLLECTED, WITHHELD OR ASSESSED BY
THE GOVERNMENT OF REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR
AUTHORITY THEREOF THEREIN.

THIS GUARANTEE IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY
SECURITIES (1993 REVISION) INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, PUBLICATION NUMBER
ICC 500.

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
PT BANK EKSPOR IMPOR (PERSERO)
   JAKARTA PLAZA EXIM BRANCH


           [SEAL]


/s/ ****               /s/ ****
-----------------      -----------------
     B.43.8                 B.64.1



ENDORSEMENT BANK INDONESIA
           [SEAL]


/s/ ****
--------------------------
261 La. 313

#### Albert V. RICH et al. v. Wade O. MARTIN, Jr., et al.

No. 52028.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 1972.

In re: Wade O. Martin, Jr., Jack P. F. Gremillion and Douglas Fowler applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 259 So.2d 113.

Application denied; there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
No. 00-1160.

#### Salmon v. West Clark Community Schools.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                          Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<CASH>                                         1179
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5269
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                    1179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10852
<PP&E>                                        97724
<DEPRECIATION>                                33790 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                78323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         16874
<BONDS>                                       15963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        229
<OTHER-SE>                                    34365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  78323
<SALES>                                       32282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              32282
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 33071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (610)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1257)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1165)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.64)
        

</TABLE>
#### Francis Yvonne BROSI, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42647.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 31, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 263 So.2d 849.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF  TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of California Independent Bancorp, a California corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Form10-Q") that, to the best of their knowledge,:

|                         |  |                                                                                  
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2002 |  | /s/JOHN I. JELAVICHJohn I. Jelavich President and Chief Executive Officer        
|                         |  |                                                                                  
|Dated: November 12, 2002 |  | /s/KEVIN R. WATSONKevin R. Watson Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

---

QuickLinks
X°

y

Xx

va & gril ger ee ie ¢
:£ ae tie | Og Lee ie Meee
Ly % 4 “7 eg a ee
7 4 * a i
\ or a Te
* y

» *
4
8

*

” ”%

. ‘ \ Ne

\

®S Mie

*~

,

, ar
A OANS,

A %
‘
X

z
f
>
=
=

= AK NAS ALN \x We . oe. i
)

é
4A

® «2 one

¢
*
'

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.
#### Samuel MULLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 16, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

            CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND CASHIER
             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Volunteer  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Corporation")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  the President and Vice  President and Cashier of the  Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Corporation;

Date:  August 12, 2004             By: /s/ Reed D. Matney
                                       ---------------------------------
                                           Reed D. Matney
                                           President


Date:  August 12, 2004             By: /s/ Greg Oliver
                                       ---------------------------------
                                           Greg Oliver
                                           Vice President and Cashier
#### Frank J. SPARTI, Appellant, v. Ronald B. KAUFMAN et al., Appellees.

No. 72-106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 17, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Harry C. LONG, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of Olan W. Moore, and Olan W. Moore, Appellees.

No. 71-354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 5, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
April 24, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

QUINCY DOUGLASS SMITH, SR., Appellant

NO. 14-12-00019-CV V.

CAROL A. SMITH, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on January 6, 2012. Having considered the motion and found 

it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

QUINCY DOUGLASS SMITH, SR.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31281 USDC No. 97-CV-2123

TERRY MICHAEL JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

- - - - - - - - - - May 31, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Terry Michael Johnson, Louisiana prisoner No. 292732, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of certain of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 claims without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies and of other claims as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). COA is GRANTED and the case is VACATED AND REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.No. 98-31281 -2- The partial state records filed in this case are inadequate to support the district court’s assumption that Johnson has not exhausted his state remedies with regard to his claims of an illegal arrest and insufficient evidence. See Magouirk v. Phillips , 144 F.3d 348, 362-63 (5th Cir. 1998). Additionally, the district court did not address Johnson’s assertion, supported by documentary evidence in the record, that the limitations period was tolled by a state habeas application which was pending from April 1996 until March 14, 1997. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2).On remand, after obtaining all of Johnson’s relevant statecourt records, the district court should first address whether the limitations period was tolled by the pendency of Johnson’s state habeas application or whether Johnson’s federal habeas claims are time-barred. If the court determines that Johnson’s federal habeas application was timely, it should then address whether Johnson’s application contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims. If the district court determines that Johnson’s application is not time-barred, but that some of his claims are unexhausted, it should address whether the unexhausted claims are “technically exhausted” because they are procedurally barred under state law and, thus, subject to federal review under the standards applicable to procedurally defaulted claims. See
Jones v. Jones , 163 F.3d 285, 296 (5th Cir. 1998). If the court determines that Johnson’s application contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims, Johnson should be afforded an opportunity to amend his application to present only his claims which areNo. 98-31281 -3- exhausted before his application is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Rose v. Lundy , 455 U.S. 509, 5518-33 (1982). COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
**Exhibit 23**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C.

 

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of our report dated February 26, 2003, on the consolidated balance sheets of Logan County BancShares, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002.  Said report appears in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K/A.

 
|                 |   |   | /s/ McNEAL WILLIAMSON & CO. |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   |   |                            |   |   |
| Logan, West Virginia |   |   |                            |   |   |
| March 29, 2005       |   |   |                            |   |   |

 

----
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 14 

To provide for the partial settlement of certain claims under the Alaska 

Native Claims Settlement Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2013 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. BEGICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the partial settlement of certain claims under 

the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southeast Alaska Na5 tive Land Conveyance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) MAPS.—The term ‘‘maps’’ means the maps 

9 entitled ‘‘Sealaska Land Entitlement Finalization’’, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 14 IS

1 numbered 5 and 9 of 17, and dated October 17, 

2 2012. 

3 (2) SEALASKA.—The term ‘‘Sealaska’’ means 

4 the Sealaska Corporation, a Regional Native Cor5 poration established under the Alaska Native Claims 

6 Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.). 

7 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

8 the Secretary of the Interior. 

9 (4) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

10 of Alaska. 

11 SEC. 3. SOUTHEAST ALASKA PARTIAL NATIVE LAND CON12 VEYANCE. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the 

14 date of enactment of this Act and subject to valid existing 

15 rights and subsection (b), the Secretary shall convey to 

16 Sealaska the 2 parcels of Federal land comprising approxi17 mately 3,380 acres, as generally depicted on the maps, in 

18 partial fulfillment of the remaining land entitlement of 

19 Sealaska under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native 

20 Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)). 

21 (b) PUBLIC EASEMENTS.—The conveyance under 

22 subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that the 

23 Secretary identify and reserve, by the date that is 2 years 

24 after the date of enactment of this Act, public easements 

25 under section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims SettleVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:55 Feb 28, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S14.IS S14

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 14 IS

1 ment Act (43 U.S.C. 1616(b); 85 Stat. 708) with respect 

2 to the Federal land conveyed under subsection (a). 

3 (c) TREATMENT OF LAND CONVEYED.—The Federal 

4 land conveyed to Sealaska under subsection (a) shall be 

5 considered to be land conveyed by the Secretary under sec6 tion 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 

7 (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANTE CARLOS GAVILANO; et al.,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70979

 09-70982

 09-70984

Agency No. A095-198-936

 A095-198-938

 A095-198-939 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 20, 2011** 

San Francisco, California

Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated petitions for review, Dante Carlos Gavilano and his

family, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motions to reconsider and

FILED

MAY 04 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70979

reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider and reopen, Cano-Merida v. INS,

311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002), and we deny the petitions for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motions to

reconsider. The motions failed to specify any error of fact or law with respect to

the BIA’s dispositive determination that petitioners’ motions to reopen was

untimely and that they failed to establish they were entitled to equitable tolling. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1); see also Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th

Cir. 2003) (equitable tolling available “when a petitioner is prevented from filing

because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due

diligence”).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motions to

reopen where petitioners failed to demonstrate that their additional evidence was

previously unavailable. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1); Bhasin v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d

977, 984 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### William H. ARSENAULT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-772.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
DEPARTMENT-OF COMMERCEDUREAU OF am
‘THE CENSUS plate ister rae BE

en Et 4} FOURTEENTH OENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1020 J820 POPULATION ENUNERATION DisHICT HOF}

= Tomah oR oni Bison oF binlitesera-aecesauesarummmseee ten NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE,

* sa ei WARD OF cirY,
awe oF str = * EwiMéRATED BYE On os ZB ile fetane, Lalleeer LEM ahhe |

ora So - mae - ¥
cf 5 iT ee aoe t co 3
za TRAE TUMAIT Ee a H
MA It de qe | Tale a Fi
TWA EAE IEEE CIEE ce ees ime eee
: z = — = Zs
TTA AaatS: bly pect
T TAS Aas Blob az
TET Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.
Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here. is i:
EXy.
=I Laleo bed al 771775 Wass a?)
ae Tet hes Agee eeecce |
bard B 7 cl Aeaees ede. =
ran AAO fies
2a Xe I. EG
fee al ecco ihe, Cel Taleo ZS.
Z satscaihe|
rn ee ie aL Za
fl IAS WEA =
ZF ‘ali eho ~ Pade Lt. Ge
S a Find oe, vi a Yeap Geel fur ie
t Creo lose
Loe
Few Ham sl Get
eta Se U,
Le,
I erty cave)
aes Lake
“Cel, (zo
2
vl Ly Ahecllon
eesehlag inns
ta Le indeed
iI = i “ ee
f eee
/B| Cot | = us
aes IEE! Gi
3.) VOTI TOYS PEA
sat S xaaralt sccal
af im 2a OE
Docket No. FAA-2014-0179
ed ee Oe ee eR eon eee nnn

Township or o

LOCATION,

rl Pen

&S t-
IN CITIES, Se ~
se 4
Es 5
=
“ B B
Z is*.J€
a “ad | es
g 1.78|%
3 Fi z43 g
E | ° a2> 5
oa fos) “A i

omer of visitation,

dep

ther division of county —

NAME

of each person -wuose place of
abode on June 1, 1900, was
in this family.

Enter surname first, then the given name and
middie initial, Ifany.

INCLUDE cr

person living on Jone 1, 1900.
Orr chill

n born eince June 1, 1900.

we en we

Enumerated by me on the

—

7—224.

TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES.

SCHEDULE No. 1—POPULATION.

Cea fe

¢
e Prrcrrepe edicer cere
townahlp, town, district, or other civil division, as the case may be. See instructions]

Name of incorporated city, town, or viliage, within the above-named division,

YT = mare
a4 = . al Cis
Mt ote toh oh! at

( Supervisor's District No. gee
leeenerision District No. LOT:

Name of Institution,

B

Sheet No. () |

i

RELATION. PERSONAL DESCRIPTION.

y

DATE OF
BIRTH.

ease

tthe. day of June, 1900, ~~... ~

NATIVITY.

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If born in the United
States, give the Slats or Terrifory; if of foreign birth, give the Country only.

Corre Cactiz, Enumerator.

OCCUPATION, TRADE, OR
PROFESSION

of each person TEN YEARS of age

——

Relationship of cach
to the head
of the family. Place of birth of this

Prnsox.

widowed, or divorced,

children.
livitug,

Whether singlo, married,
Mother of how man

Number of years marricd,

———_—— -_

Place of birth of Farnrz
of this person.

=
»

Re
iS

- ee eee Cee

cw | Ago nt last birthday,
= | Naomber of thesechtldron

cr | Color or race,

—

and over.

wt ee ene oe

Ward of city,

EDUCATION.

Place of birth of Morura
of this person,

the United States,
United Btatea
employed,

Attended
montha)

|

Year of Immlgration to
Number of years tn the

Naturalization.
Monthe not

school (In

me
e

1
——————

Mew fiasy

en

in

Mew
eet,

Mae Ju

eps

2,

——-

Number of farm schedule, :

Farm or houses,

"
=

-|+eee en

ie toe