alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RCRAREVISION CHECKLIST44 B Corrective Action Beyond the Facility Boundary

FEDERAL ANALOGOUS STATE ANALOG IS: MOREBROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV- STRIN- ER IN REQUIREMENT CITATION CITA TJON ALENT GENT SCOPE PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR THE OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART F

- RELEASES FROM SOUD WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM new introductory wording 264.100(e} WAC 173-303-645(1l)(e) X compliance point/ downgradient property boundary 264.100(e}(1) WAC 173-303-645(]] He) X release beyond the facility boundary 264.1 00(e)(2) WAC 173-303-645(II He) X CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR SOUD WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS

## ~.\ corrective action beyond facility boundaries 264.101(c) WAC 173-303-646{2{b)

December 1, 1987

- Page 3 of 8 

### X
#### Mary ROUGHGARDEN, Appellant, v. Robert REAHARD, individually, and as father and next friend of Pamela K. Reahard, a minor; James H. McConnell, as Administrator of the Estate of Jack Williams, Appellees.

No. 67-67.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 8, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Maria Schultz, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

[736 NYS2d 611]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated March 30, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant established, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance *550Law § 5102 (d), thereby shifting the burden to the plaintiff to submit sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact on that issue (see, *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955). The evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, *Massey v She Shang Jung,*280 AD2d 586; *Goldin v Lee,*275 AD2d 341; *Smith v Askew,*264 AD2d 834; *cf., Scheer v Koubek,*70 NY2d 678; *Lopez v Senatore, 65*NY2d 1017). Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 28, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00146-CV

MARTHA MELENDEZ, Appellant

V.

ALMARIE PEOPLES EDDIE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-05857-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Molberg, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Molberg

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past 

due. By postcard dated February 4, 2020, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee 

was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly 

cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. 

Also by postcard dated February 4, 2020, we informed appellant the docketing 

statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the 

docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal. By 

letter dated April 10, 2020, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been 
–2–

filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to 

provide, within ten days, (1) verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the 

clerk’s record, or (2) written documentation that appellant had been found entitled 

to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so 

would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the 

filing fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with 

the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

200146f.p05

/Ken Molberg/

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MARTHA MELENDEZ, Appellant

No. 05-20-00146-CV V.

ALMARIE PEOPLES EDDIE, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-05857-

A.

Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. 

Justices Schenck and Nowell 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee ALMARIE PEOPLES EDDIE recover her 

costs of this appeal from appellant MARTHA MELENDEZ.

Judgment entered this 28th day of April, 2020.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      12,062,710
<SECURITIES>                                 6,004,874
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,553,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,838,533
<INVENTORY>                                    462,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,062,762
<PP&E>                                      11,693,149
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,821,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,850,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,300,574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,009
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,151,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,850,860
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,658,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,075,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,126,366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,226,239
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,363,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,363,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,363,222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Arlen F. Henock, the chief financial officer of Proliance International, Inc. (the ‘‘issuer’’), does hereby certify that the report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the ‘‘report’’) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Arlen F. Henock

Arlen F. Henock
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)
Proliance International, Inc.

November 15, 2007

---
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  Third Quarter 1998 and 1997




                                     Third      Third     Standard    Standard
Area                                quarter    quarter    error on    error on
                                     1998       1997     1998 rate  difference

United States.....................      66.8       66.0        0.2         0.2

  Inside MAs......................      64.8       63.9        0.2         0.3
   In central cities..............      50.5       50.2        0.3         0.5
   Not in central cities (suburbs)      73.8       72.6        0.2         0.3
  Outside MAs.....................      75.0       74.0        0.4         0.5

 Northeast........................      63.4       63.0        0.4         0.6
 Midwest..........................      71.7       70.7        0.4         0.5
 South............................      68.8       68.2        0.3         0.4
 West.............................      61.1       59.8        0.4         0.5
#### William G. RITTENBERY, Appellant, v. Wilson N. KIRKLAND and Thelma Kirkland, Appellees.

No. M-220.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 18, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

EyeCare Centers of America, Inc.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Exhibit 12.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 12/28/1996  1/3/1998    1/2/1999   1/1/2000    12/30/00
                                                 ----------  --------    --------   --------    --------
<S>                                              <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>

Net earnings (loss)..............................   1,418      5,215     (26,273)    (5,257)    (15,534)
Add: Income tax provision........................     188        335          13        384         766
                                                   ------     ------     -------     ------     -------
                                                    1,606      5,550     (26,260)    (4,873)    (14,768)

Fixed Charges:
     Interest expense, net.......................  10,341     14,380      23,804     25,091      28,964
     Interest factor portion of rent expense.....   4,368      6,254       6,888      8,466       9,923
                                                   ------     ------     -------     ------     -------
     Total fixed charges.........................  14,709     20,634      30,692     33,557      38,887

Earnings before income
     taxes and fixed charges.....................  16,315     26,184       4,432     28,684      24,119

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges...............    1.11       1.27        0.14       0.85        0.62

</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & 

TERMINALS L.P., 

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

U.S. VENTURE, INC., U.S. OIL CO., INC., 

Defendants-Appellants

______________________

2023-1739

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:15-cv-08178, Judge 

Rebecca R. Pallmeyer.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

December 5, 2023

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 5, 2023

Case: 23-1739 Document: 23 Page: 1 Filed: 12/05/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1446 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1446

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve the affordability 
         of the health care tax credit, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2013

Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. Brown, Ms. Stabenow, and Ms. Hirono) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve the affordability 
         of the health care tax credit, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Care Coverage for Displaced 
Workers Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF THE AFFORDABILITY OF THE HEALTH CARE TAX CREDIT.

    (a) Increase in Credit.--Subsection (a) of section 35 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``72.5 percent'' 
and inserting ``80 percent''.
    (b) Permanent Extension.--Subparagraph (B) of section 35(b)(1) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``, and before 
January 1, 2014''.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subsection (b) of section 7527 of the Internal Revenue 
        Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``72.5 percent'' and 
        inserting ``80 percent''.
            (2) Paragraph (1) of section 7527(e) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``72.5 percent'' and inserting ``80 
        percent''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to coverage months beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1614 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1614

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
 To require Certificates of Citizenship and other Federal documents to 
reflect name and date of birth determinations made by a State court and 
                           for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Accuracy for Adoptees Act''.
SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF STATE COURT DETERMINATIONS OF NAME AND BIRTH 
DATE.
    Section 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1431) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) A Certificate of Citizenship or other Federal document issued 
or requested to be amended under this section shall reflect the child's 
name and date of birth as indicated on a State court order, birth 
certificate, certificate of foreign birth, certificate of birth abroad, 
or similar State vital records document issued by the child's State of 
residence in the United States after the child has been adopted or 
readopted in that State.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32-1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of MangoSoft, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Dale Vincent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Dale Vincent
    ---------------------------
    Chief Executive Officer (principal executive and
    financial officer)

    November 12, 2004


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 03/03-0249]

Notice is hereby given that Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P., 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2900, Wayne, PA 19087, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P. is seeking post-financing approval from SBA for loan and equity financings it made to POSC Holdings LLC, formerly known as Panhandle Oilfield Service Companies, Inc., 14000 Quail Springs Parkway, Suite 300, Oklahoma City, OK 73134.

                    The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Argosy Investment Partners V, L.P., an Associate of Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P., owns more than ten percent of POSC Holdings LLC, and therefore this transaction is considered                     *Financing an Associate*                     requiring prior SBA approval. Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P. has already made its investments in POSC Holdings LLC and is seeking post-financing SBA approval.                

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on this transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2018-16206 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 4.2

 


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED VIACOMCBS
EXCESS 401(k) PLAN- 


PART A (2021 RESTATEMENT) &


PART B (2021 RESTATEMENT)


 


 


Effective as of February 16, 2022, the ViacomCBS Excess
401(k) Plan (each of Part A and Part B) is amended such that, for all periods on or after February 16, 2022, all references to “ViacomCBS”
or “ViacomCBS Inc.” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount Global”, including such that: all references to the
“ViacomCBS Administrative Committee” or “ViacomCBS Investments Committee” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount
Global Administrative Committee” and “Paramount Global Investments Committee”, respectively; all references to “ViacomCBS
401(k) Plan” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount Global 401(k) Plan”; and reference to “ViacomCBS Inc.”
in the definition of “Company” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount Global”.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to a resolution of the
Paramount Global Administrative Committee, the undersigned hereby executes this amendment this 7th day of October, 2022.


 


 


 


	 	 
	 	By:	 	
    /s/ Mark Beatty

	 	 	 	Name: Mark Beatty
	 	 	 	
    Its: Member, Paramount Global


    Administrative Committee
I,  David  E.  McComas,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report on Form 10-K of Eye Care Centers of
     America,  Inc.;

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any untrue
     statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make  the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this  report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
          supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which  this  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of  the  period  covered  by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          fourth  fiscal  quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely  to  materially  affect, the registrant's internal control over
          financial  reporting.

5.   The  registrant's  other  certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the  registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  function):

     a)   all  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting which are
          reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the registrant's ability to
          record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information;

     b)   any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees  who  have  a  significant role in the registrant's internal
          control  over  financial  reporting.

Date:  March  24,  2004
/S/  DAVID  E.  MCCOMAS
-----------------------
David  E.  McComas
President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer