alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-46,473-16 IN RE RONNEY EARL WILLIAMS, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 74312 IN THE 412 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM BRAZ ORIA COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 412 District Court of Br azoria County , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the

t h application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ um s t ances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Br azoria County , is order ed to file a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus a

pplication, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates iss ues t o be investigated ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

Relator has not filed an application for a wr i t o f h ab eas corpus in Br azoria County
. Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was
serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitted with the response. T his application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has su b m i t t ed the appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: De cembe r 10, 2014 Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38130-38131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16645]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Pacific Islands Logbook Family of Forms.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0214.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved 
information collection).
    Number of Respondents: 527.
    Average Hours Per Response: Logbooks and sales reports, 5-35 
minutes based on fishery, entry/exit and landing notices, Protected 
Species Zone entry/exit notices, 5 minutes; landing/offloading notices, 
3 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 13,731.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for extension of a currently 
approved information collection.
    Fishermen in Federally-managed fisheries in the Pacific Islands 
Region are required to provide certain information about their fishing 
activities, catch, and interactions with protected species by 
submitting reports to National Marine Fisheries Service, per 50 CFR 
part 665. These data are needed to determine the condition of the 
stocks and whether the current management measures are having the

[[Page 38131]]

intended effects, to evaluate the benefits and costs of changes in 
management measures, and to monitor and respond to accidental takes of 
endangered and threatened species, including seabirds, sea turtles, and 
marine mammals.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations; 
individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e8a7a1baa9b7bb9d8a85819b9b818786a887858ac68d8798c68f879e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="420d0b10031d1137202f2b31312b2d2c022d2f206c272d326c252d34">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: July 31, 2018.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-16645 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 2349 LT Case No. 2010

- CF

- 14001

- A

_____________________________ A NTONIO D EWAYNE A DAMS

M AXWELL , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

3.8 0 0 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. London M. Kite , Judge

. Antonio Dewayne Adams

- Maxwell , Milton , pro se
. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristie Regan , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

March 12 , 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

.

K ILBANE , M AC I VER , AND P RATT , JJ., concur
.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
262 La. 1091

#### Sandra Jean FAYARD, wife of Mayer Jules HEIMAN v. Dr. Mayer Jules HEIMAN.

No. 52647.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1972.

In re: Sandra Jean Fayard applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 263 So.2d 69.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
#### Jerome Saitta, Plaintiff, v City of New York, Respondent, and Bicent Properties, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[722 NYS2d 522]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kibbie Payne, J.), entered May 16, 2000, which, in a slip and fall action, denied the motion of defendant-appellant property owner Bicent Properties (Bicent) and the cross motion of defendant City of New York for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law and upon a search of the record, to grant summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against the City of New York, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-respondent City of New York dismissing the complaint.

Summary judgment was properly denied to Bicent since triable issues remain as to whether it created or heightened the *334icy hazard on the sidewalk that is alleged to have caused plaintiff to slip and fall *(compare, Gaudino v 511 W. 232nd St. Owners Corp.,*279 AD2d 272; *Bale v Pyron,*256 AD2d 1128). The action should, however, have been dismissed as against the City in view of the meteorological evidence showing that the precipitation ended on the morning preceding plaintiff’s accident, with sub-freezing temperatures on that day and the two preceding days *(see, Sing Ping Cheung v City of New York,*234 AD2d 91; *Valentine v City of New York,*86 AD2d 381, *affd*57 NY2d 932; *compare, Rugova v 2199 Holland Ave. Apt. Corp.,*272 AD2d 261, 263). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
ea |
~

——

yn tS
/ ? ai ihman wena ae 16; and 17 not to be asked in respect to infants. numbered: 11,12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20
Page No. OF ‘ spo tp ti ip pr aro 2, ya are

Someporg 1.—Inhabitants tn od $7224. « LU, Of Sr ,» in the County of _

?

fo Ww Maj
of LCz eage “21, enumerated by me on the _/7~_ day ‘of __& 7 1870, DY
Post fermi KOLB A | LS Load L larly, Ass't Marka?

VALUE OF Real EsTaTE
OWNED.

——

—~-

RELATIONS.
Ss &

rt
is

—~—

Whether deaf
and dumb,

_ | blind, insane,
or idiotic,

Place of Birth, naming State
or Territory of U. 8.;. or the

2d pT
ht to vote

The name of every person whioge
place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

—

)
(

iyo months
la
rth, 5
r, state

us, +4.

‘&
o
nds than re-

numbered in tho order

of visitation.
"Aes
Fomales (F.)

the order of visitation,

CONSTITUTIONAL |-

month (Jan., Fob., &¢.)

month (Jan,, Feb., &c.)

ears ofage and u

x
w

hore rig
denied or abridged on

——_—
—

Dwelling-houses, numbered in
If born within tho year, state

Father of foroign birth
bellion or other crime.

Male Citizens of U. 8. ¢
Male Citizensof U. 8. of 2

21 years of age

(B.), Mulatto (M.
wards.

| Sex.—Moles (M.),
nese (C.), Indian (I.
Value of Real Estate.
| Motbor of foreign bi
If married within the

| Color.—Whito (AV,),

under 1
in froct
other grou

‘| Age at Inat birthday. If
oar,

wD Familics,

—_
or
pot
we

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

LDLSIA “ ttl feng WUMMMULMUE) DLV CF At, PAG SUN Fi
UA HM gio oH)
L Ue V MM bGALY) 2 Y\A: PUVLOCV _-

alg viph GZ
Lit 1)

Hie lee” : Ii

EMA | Lad file fee Vib Fit u
LoaLty fete 24 Liga Ltt’ _| LY, aS }
Lr 7 MWsAfiek |X | : Wupetd chau
olilagiaafl Me? Mt aaa by LU | m9 WALZ Eis. = |
Lu fe a P lta P44 ss Rattle LGTY 0 Daw Va

5) D2 BIW \ Divelkigwn |

V Mhyy | Y

Vy Uh pn)

¢/

-

+ No. of dwellings, _ 7 No. of white femalgs, / J a No. of males, foreign born, ZS
‘<b familics, P ) ] “i COE colored males, / sk OE females, é 6h 2 f 4 ov a
“¢ & white males, wp» Lf ek se fernales, “ik blind, ———

= :

3 ie o-

om

ec @N fo oH =e OH WH

= _ : “2 — =
a ee - = rye are —s = ea Yoo a >
pre glee ofr Es 0s dela ett me Sad pS ee 1 Rhett er cent oes te ut ee Se wey, c
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 6, 2014 518809 

________________________________

In the Matter of SCOTTIE 

MORRISON,

Petitioner,

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ALBERT PRACK, as Director of 

Special Housing and Inmate 

Disciplinary Programs,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________

Scottie Morrison, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and

Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating

certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was scanned with a hand scanner that activated

near his waist, prompting a strip frisk to be authorized. He

attempted to retrieve an item from his waist when his wrist

restraints were removed for the frisk, and correction officers

were obliged to subdue him. He was thereafter charged in a

misbehavior report with attempting to assault staff and failing

to comply with frisk procedures. A sharpened piece of metal was

recovered from the area soon after the incident occurred, and
-2- 518809 

petitioner was charged in a second misbehavior report with

possessing a weapon. Following a combined tier III disciplinary

hearing on both reports, he was found guilty of failing to comply

with frisk procedures and possessing a weapon. The determination

was affirmed upon administrative review, and this CPLR article 78

proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence, in the form of the

misbehavior reports, related documentation and hearing testimony,

supports the determination of guilt (see Matter of Fowler v

Fischer, 106 AD3d 1344, 1345 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 865

[2013]; Matter of Jackson v Fischer, 98 AD3d 766, 767 [2012]). 

Petitioner was not charged with disobeying a direct order and,

contrary to his contention, no direct order to comply with

established frisk procedures was necessary. Rather, his actions

in forecfully attempting to reach into his waistband and the

ensuing struggle were sufficient evidence of his active

resistance and failure to comply with the efforts to frisk him.

His remaining claims, to the extent preserved, have been

considered and found to lack merit.

Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10526

Summary Calendar

JERALD JEROME DORSEY,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

REBECCA TAMEZ; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CV-856

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerald Jerome Dorsey appeals the dismissal of a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

challenging his 180-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. 

Dorsey argued that he was actually innocent of his sentence under the Armed

Career Criminal Act in light of Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137 (2008). 

As a general rule, a federal prisoner who seeks to collaterally challenge the

legality of his conviction or sentence must file a § 2255 motion. Padilla v. United

States, 416 F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir. 2005). Such claims may be raised in a

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 29, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10526 Document: 00511805633 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2012
No. 11-10526

§ 2241 petition under the savings clause of § 2255(e) only if the prisoner shows

that the § 2255 remedy is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his

detention.” § 2255(e). 

Dorsey has not made such a showing because he has not established that

his claims are based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision

establishing that he was convicted of a nonexistent offense. See Reyes-Requena

v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Moreover, a claim of actual

innocence of a career offender enhancement is not a claim of actual innocence of

the crime of conviction and, thus, not the type of claim that warrants review

under § 2241. See Kinder v. Purdy, 222 F.3d 209, 213-14 (5th Cir. 2000); see also

Padilla, 416 F.3d at 426-27. Dorsey has not shown that he is entitled to proceed

under § 2241 based on the savings clause of § 2255(e). 

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the

motion for extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-10526 Document: 00511805633 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2012
#### James H. McCONNELL, as Administrator of the Estate of Jack Williams, Appellant, v. Robert REAHARD, Individually and as father and next friend of Pamela K. Reahard, a minor, Appellee.

No. 67-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 8, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Richard A. Wisot, the
chief financial officer of Transpro, Inc. (the "issuer"), does hereby certify
that the report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the "report")
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.



/s/ Richard A. Wisot
--------------------
Richard A. Wisot
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)
Transpro, Inc.
May 11, 2004






                                       22
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40262 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ISRAEL CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-561-3

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Israel Cruz has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cruz was informed of counsel’s motion but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
#### John Henry OLIVER, Petitioner, v. Hon. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 74-12.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 11, 1974.

Habeas corpus denied.
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Edward
B. Meyercord, III, Chief Executive Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. have
reviewed Talk America Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) and, based on the inquiries I
have made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the
Chief Executive Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., I hereby certify
that:
 
 (i) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (ii) the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America Holdings,
Inc.
 
 /s/
Edward B. Meyercord, III
 Edward B.
Meyercord, III
 Chief
Executive Officer and President
 November
9, 2005
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert BENVENISTE and Louise A. Guidice, Appellees.

No. 72-1073.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I ,. ~ 

r,~ ~ 

f_--

t f, 

1: 

Page:No.//r .     _;. . ..,c . . __ ...... , ··:·'~"'·"''" .. ,.,,.,.F!:::.<;? .. ".~~, ,

~ULE·L~Free Inhabitants .in~f~~~~~#Mbl:W- ~~- in the Co~ty-of·'-~/);~·~j(

_I 

m 

3 

41 

fD 

6 

7 

6 

9 

no 

of ~a4j#z,,a. cu2 · enumerated by me, on the ,.ff ~ day. of ~ -· 1860i Auit

Post Office · _/ 4vn, di,; ~,;d'A(-- . 

The llAllle or Overy person whose usual 

place or abode on the fint day or June, 

18601 WU in thil fomily. 

D&l_CRIPTlO!l. 

Profession, Occupotion, or Trade of 

each person, male and· female, over 

15 y .. ro Of"ll"• . 

\ 

Valueo1 

Real&state. 

8 

Valueol 

Personal 

Estate. 

9 

· Place or Birth1 

. NllJlling the State, Territory, 

or Qoun!l'Y• 

·~ 

u- 

llJ 

13 .L 

- H. 

UJ 

l6 

11 

IS 

to 

go 

~1 

2~_ 

23 

2il 

23 

96 

27 

98 

29 

30 

31 

33 

3<i 

M 

36 

t7 

38 

39 

40 

No. white mu.le•, _lbf_ No. colored malea, _ No. foreign born,_ No. blind,_.·_: - - lf · · · · · 1v · .No.whiteremalea, ~ No.coloredf1moleo,_ No.deafanddumb,_ No.inlano,'...:__ \ 

'h 

No. paupen,I_
#### Eddie McCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-549.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 18, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Consumer Rule III

GDS Mandate
2 

Airline Reservation Systems

Global Distribution Systems

Travelport Amadeus Sabre

Online Travel 

Agents Travel Agents

Consumers

Yesterday
3 

Airline Reservation Systems

Global Distribution Systems

Travelport Amadeus Sabre

Online Travel 

Agents Travel Agents

Consumers

Airline 

Web 

Sites

Today

 Higher Costs GDS incentive payments Monopoly pricing Antiquated technology Little incentive to evolve

 L C
4 

Airline Reservation Systems

Consumers

 Lower Costs More competition Personalization More choice Transparency

Coming soon...

Open Standard (API)

Online 

Travel 

Agents

Airline 

Web 

Sites

Travel 

Agents

Start 

Ups GDS
5 

Commercial Aviation:Engine for Growth Major contributor to GDP

4.9% of US GDP and 9.3 million jobs

 Major tax and charges contributor

$16.6 billion in taxes, fees, and charges$57 billion including tax receipts for employees and corporate taxes

 Highly productive jobs

Average $105,300 in GVA annually – above national average

 Connects the U.S. to the world

787M passengers and 23M tons of freight to, from and within the U3201 routes connecting major U.S. airports to the world

 Great value

Passengers gain $475B more in value than they pay
##### 



First
Amendment Borrower Banks
 BACKGROUND
 Loan Agreement
    AMENDMENTS TO LOAN AGREEMENT
 Maturity Date Section 1.1
 Maturity Date Section 2.9 9.1
 Article IV Section 4.24
 Anti-Terrorism Laws
 Anti-Terrorism Laws Executive Order
 1




---



##### 



USA PATRIOT Act
       clause (b)
 Article XI Section 11.19
 USA PATRIOT Act Notice
 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES TRUE; NO DEFAULT
 2




---



##### 



CONDITIONS TO EFFECTIVENESS
      3




---



##### 



REFERENCE TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT
   COSTS, EXPENSES AND TAXES
 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS
 GOVERNING LAW; BINDING EFFECT
 HEADINGS
 ENTIRE AGREEMENT
 4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



BORROWER:
CITIZENS, INC.By:Mark A. OliverPresident 6




---



##### 



ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:
REGIONS BANKBy:Robin IngariSenior Vice President BANKS:
REGIONS BANKBy:Robin IngariSenior Vice President GUARANTY BANKBy:Dan LeonardVice President 7
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  Third Quarter 2004


                              Third      Third    Standard   Standard
Age of householder           Quarter    Quarter   error on   error on
                              2003       2004     2004 rate difference

United States..............      68.4       69.0        0.2        0.2

    Under 25 years.........      23.3       25.4        0.6        0.8
    25 to 29 years.........      40.2       39.9        0.6        0.9
    30 to 34 years.........      56.6       57.7        0.5        0.8
    35 to 39 years.........      65.6       65.4        0.5        0.7
    40 to 44 years.........      71.7       71.5        0.4        0.7
    45 to 49 years.........      75.3       75.7        0.4        0.6
    50 to 54 years.........      77.8       79.4        0.4        0.6
    55 to 59 years.........      80.4       80.7        0.4        0.7
    60 to 64 years.........      81.8       81.8        0.5        0.7
    65 to 69 years.........      83.0       84.0        0.5        0.8
    70 to 74 years.........      82.3       84.5        0.5        0.8
    75 years and over......      78.9       79.5        0.4        0.6

      Under 35 years.......      42.5       43.1        0.3        0.5
      35 to 44 years.......      68.8       68.6        0.3        0.5
      45 to 54 years.......      76.5       77.4        0.3        0.5
      55 to 64 years.......      81.1       81.2        0.3        0.5
      65 years and over....      80.7       81.8        0.3        0.4