alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
261 La. 524

#### Mrs. Frances W. JAGERS v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY et al.

No. 52275.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 1972.

In re: Royal Indemnity Company and Wesley Lynn Jagers applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 257 So.2d 806.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Now, therefore, the said Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the case above entitled.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1647 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1647

   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal 
  distributions for medicine qualified only if for prescribed drug or 
                                insulin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 2013

 Mr. Roberts (for himself, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johanns, Mr. 
Inhofe, Mr. Heller, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Enzi, and Mr. Flake) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal 
  distributions for medicine qualified only if for prescribed drug or 
                                insulin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Access to Medication 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MEDICINE QUALIFIED ONLY IF FOR 
              PRESCRIBED DRUG OR INSULIN.

    Section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(Public Law 111-148) and the amendments made by such section are 
repealed, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if 
such section, and amendments, had never been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
!--------"-------- ~.l-~..a<~~"""'"'"'----1;1.L.-1 

1------"--"---1~~-l-_.c..L:.:5.dAdu:&L---1!.L-I 

1

1

, ____ ___.,_· _____ __&g_, _ __.,,_!::f&~:!cl.Gl._-l) __ _J_,

1..u~~';i;.J:,..__kJ~'h..fl.'un~~-1~1----LLL:t:cUd.~'---ILL-l 

~a,A,..,oL,_,.,- --·------1-----<L----¥-'--I 

~&rz:~ryv<W/U.P...,._~/~ef~Q-a(,~•~h~1-----1~l-__;_J<a!:u:A~e..t...t____i.r,:.._,.i/ 

i----"'J_"". 'L....,4""' .. ....,.""Jr"".,,___, ___ --__!/tJ__[___:_,#J:i4'l:U.:i~r4--i.t. 

·l

1

1------""----1--·-----9Ll-___j.dd.~~~.:__'-l.1! 

l------~---1----~l-~"-"'~~ ...... --'-l.I'.---

·l----"-HL-LfhxL4.<>U"""'4'""'1'""4-1"'A..._ ,, 1 ____ __h_J_:.__!~~~~iu.....-Lr._;_ _ J:...

1

·l'

J___..dd,&{.!'au.:s.a:::a.'.....-Y':-- ,-·1--1

1-~~l&<.4::t.C274o.LO..-J.Y-· __ :_j_l-

N•~·lcllotlc, _ _'- :_.. 

No. ~~i°-·--~··. ·.
Crop Am ount Commodities 5,000 NPMA food processing structures (cocoa beans removed) 17,365 Mills and processors 135,299 Dried Cured Pork 3,730 Total Post Harvest 161,394 Cucurbits 195,698 Eggplant - field 19,725 Forest nursery 93,547 Nursery stock - fruit, nut, flower 7,955 Orchard replant 183,232 Ornamentals 64,307 Peppers - field 206,234 Strawberry

- field 812,709 Strawberry

runners 6,036 Tomatoes - field 292,751 Sweet potato slips 11,612 Total Pre-Plant 1,893,806 Total Use Limit 2,055,200 as % of baseline 8.1% CRITICA L USES in DECISION XXI/11 (kg)Pre-plant total use (as percent of total use) 92.1% Total pre-plant CUA Allowances 1,382,206

Post-harvest total use (as percent of total use) 7.9% Total postharvest CUA Allowances 117,794 Sum of above percentages 100.0% Total CUAs 1,500,000

As % of baseline 5.9% CUA Allocation Calculations

PRE-PLANT vs. POST-HARVEST CUA A LLOCA

TIONS (kg)Company Relative Share Pre-Plant

Al location Pre-Plant

Rounded Post Harvest

Al location Post Harvest

Rounded Chemtura Corp. 0.6077 839,966.358 839,966 71,583.642 71,584 Alberm arle 0.2499 345,413.186 345,413 29,436.814 29,437 ICL-IP (Ameribrom) 0.1381 190,882.597 190,883 16,267.403 16,267 Trical 0.0043 5,943.484 5,943 506.516 507 Subtotal 1.0000 1,382,205.625 1,382,206 117,794.375 117,794 Total (kg) 1,500,000 Company Specific CUA Allowances

Proposed CUE Allowance AllocationAlbem arle ICL-IP America Bill Clark Pest Control, Inc. Industrial Fumigant Co. Burnside Services, Inc. Pacific Ag Cardinal Professional Products Pest Fog Sales Corp. Chemtura Corp. Prosource One Crop Production Services Reddick Fumigants Degesch America, Inc. Trical, Inc. Helena Chemical Co. Trident Agricultural Products Hendrix and Dail Univar Hy-Yield Products, LLC We stern Fumigation Total (kilograms) 482,333

CRITICA L STOCK ALLOCA TIONS

Note: Specific company stocks data are CBI material. EPA has company specific data in the classified portion of the docket.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eldridge E. PAYTON.

No. 62469.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Eldridge E. Payton applying for mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Denied. The matter is moot. Applicant’s appeal to this Court was decided on May 31, 1978, # 60,917.
#### PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. W. C. FATJO, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2348.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

May 3, 1968.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant; Burgess McCranie, Lafayette, of counsel.

Caffery, Duhe & Davis, New Iberia, for plaintiff-appellee; Jerry Oubre, New Iberia, of counsel.

Before LEAR, CULPEPPER, and HOOD, JJ.

LEAR, Judge.

This is an appeal from a default judgment.

On June 14, 1967, plaintiff filed suit for $14,451.51 allegedly owed on open account. Defendant was personally served on the same date. Subsequently, on June 26, 1967, defendant paid $10,840.88 on the account, leaving a balance of $3,610.63. On January 18, 1968, plaintiff entered a preliminary default against the defendant, which default was confirmed and judgment rendered and signed on January 26, 1968. On February 8, 1968, defendant moved for and was granted a suspensive appeal.

Defendant does not complain of any error in the judgment and does not deny the indebtedness, his only argument being that defendant was “under the impression” that no action would be taken on the suit.

On this basis, appellant asks that we remand the case to the District Court for trial.

There being no errors assigned to the proceeding in the trial court, we find no basis for such relief.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6747
EVANS LEE JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. M. PETTIFORD, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:06-cv-02597-CMC) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Evans Lee Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Evans Lee Jones, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion for order to show cause. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Pettiford , No. 3:06-cv-02597-CMC (D.S.C. filed Apr. 30, 2008; entered May 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  



           First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

1999.....    66.7     66.6
1998.....    65.9     66.0     66.8     66.4
1997.....    65.4     65.7     66.0     65.7
1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2

1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4

\r Revised.
248 POPULATION OF CIVIL DIVISIONS LESS THAN COUNTIES.

Taste UL—STATEH OF PENNSYLVANIA—Continued. .

1870 1860 | 1850 | 1870 1s6o | 1850
7 5 3 q " COUNTIES. s)ale +2 lelelels
comms fe l/SlalElai bial? g/elPlelbljalelalt
21a | sl|a|/8l(2\2 2 3 2/8|8
j@|2 8 (ELS |ELS IE Ls él|e.je|FlS|2 |S 2 ls
Cormpta—Cont'a. CuvneRtanp—Cont’d.
. f 739| 13) Silver Spring. 2259]
Mount Pleasant tos Bq) 7G Mechanlesbatg.(bor0'-| 2569] 2510
71] 741| 10] Sonthampton........ 2050) 203t
4 462) al South Middleton 3226) 3184)
i ‘Upper Al 134i] 1314

scott.
Sugar Loaf:
‘CRAWFORD.

len
few Cumberiand, ¢bo-

101
“Weat Pennsboroug

Athens (a)... DAUPHIN,

Ricerile {borongh) «
Cambridge (b) .--....
Ganache, (borough)
Conneant

Bast Fairfield (c) -
Sochranton, (boron
airfield (¢} (9).
Grocnrro0t
Hayilel

Londonderr
Sitcrea Lower Paxton.

Tower Seatac

ou Cheek parougt)

‘td | arial
Sadsbu: B05) 29 Dauy oe
Gvansbarg, (borough) ) 174} 7] Minin
South Shenango whee: 1049) 965] 77] Borrysburg, (boron;
Spa 113i) 1083) 43 Bavoutows (orsush)

301| - 60 Portsmouth (k)
Spring 1457] 5) Re
Connenitviile,chorough}| 1000) 908] 99)
Spring, Moret) 333) 310) fanover.
Ste Susquehanna.

ockville ..

Wiconiseo (m).
‘Williams (m) 2.

Yonange, (vosough)

31 33] DELAWARE.
‘Vernon (y) 1615) 203
Yallonia, (borough). 463 153
ud 105)

Weat Faliowfiolé: 503 E>) Birmingham’:
Hartstown, (borough) «| 188 3 Chester (0) ..
‘West Shenango is 357] 3 13 ‘Chester (9) -

roodcock. 1723] 1633] 90) ‘Middle ward -

Beogstows (bh theroagh

it

‘Woodcock, Borate) jorough).
CUMBERLAND.

Dickingon (A).
East Penusborough.
aukford..

ward»
South Chester, (borough)
‘pland, (borough)

Goucord :

rby,«boroagh) —
| Bazemont.

i Haverford.
Lower Chichester
Harons Hook, coe

Mattawan
| Nether Providence.
Newtown

SHE
ca

North aidoven, (

Carlisle, (borough) 28} 3

HH
yeu (ora a =
West war fa || Upper Chichcst =
Penn (id. “i i - Bbper Davis ee
Shippensburg Saul) al 98) i8i) Sa] Uber Broviiass zw
Shippensburg, (borough) 35] 3g941 ami! G80 1541 14001 oall atedia, borough) - sail 32dl ogol 100! 2332! :
(a) In 1850 Steuben from Athens, (j) In 1850 was a borough.
() In 1851 Cambridge from (%) In 1851 Portsmouth merged in Middletown borough.
(2) 3a 1000 ane Dated Fon danela. (Exclusive of city of Hawrsbig.
(@) Exclusive of city of Meadville. @ In 1869 Williams from Wiconis«
(@) Also 1 Indian. in) Eeaustes of city of Titusville.
G) Jn 2869 West Shenango from Sonth Shenango, (0) elusive of ey of Cheater.
8 In 1868 Union from Greenwood, Fairfield, and Vernon. (p) Tn 1853 from Montour County. 4
(2) In 1859 Penn from Dickinson, {@) In 1966 incorporated.

(i) In 1850 Middlesex from North Middleton,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000948086
<NAME> PEPSI COLA PUERTO RICO BOTTLING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          46,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,027
<INVENTORY>                                      4,137
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,141
<PP&E>                                          63,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,152)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,700
<BONDS>                                          6,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,785
<SALES>                                         29,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,417
<CGS>                                         (18,924)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (30,246)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   814
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (148)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (154)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (317)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (266)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,206)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanley J. Gadek, Senior Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |     |  |                                  
|---------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------
|November 1, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stanley J. Gadek             
|                 |  |     |  | Stanley J. Gadek                 
|                 |  |     |  | Senior Vice President Finance and
|                 |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C.

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of our report dated October 7, 2004, with respect to our auditof the consolidated financial statements of Logan County BancShares, Inc. andsubsidiary as of December 31, 2003, in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

 
|                    | S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.     |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|
|                    |                     |
|                    | /s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C. |   |
|                    |
|                    |
| Wheeling, West Virginia |
| November 24, 2004  |

 

----
262 La. 1086

#### CITY OF CROWLEY FIREMEN v. CITY OF CROWLEY.

No. 52680.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1972.

In re: City of Crowley, Louisiana applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia, 264 So.2d 368.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Granted. As a matter of right certiorari will issue. Seé Bradford v. Dept. of Hospitals, 255 La. 888, 233 So.2d 553.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947986
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          6,488,653
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 123,592,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                      327,222
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                192,666,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                       131,587,203
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     58,804,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  192,666,288
<SALES>                                         3,003,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,096,163
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,167,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  150,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,531,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      247,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.36
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
Order entered May 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00343-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.T., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-10316-Z

ORDER

By order entered May 4, 2015, we granted court reporter Glenda E. Finkley’s second 

request to extend time to file the reporter’s record and directed her to file the record no later than 

May 14, 2015. To date, however, the record has not been filed. Because this is an accelerated 

appeal from a decree terminating Mother’s parental rights and the record was first due March 16, 

2015, we ORDER the record be filed no later than May 26, 2015. We CAUTION Ms. Finkley 

that failure to comply with this order may result in an order that she not sit as a court reporter 

until she complies. Accordingly, if necessary the trial court shall arrange for a substitute 

reporter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(b)(1).

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable David 

Lopez, Presiding Judge of the 256th Judicial District Court; Ms. Finkley; and counsel for the 

parties.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
#### Douglas M. CARLTON, Appellant, v. Lillian H. CARLTON, Appellee.

No. 72-817.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 27, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Graylin Rusk, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00099

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR 11

- 023 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley,

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for

further proceedings consistent with the opinion

. We further order that the appell ee
, The State of Texas , pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 12, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT
JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40887

Summary Calendar

__________________

ROBERTO GARCIA, also known as

ROBERT N. GARCIA,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-V-94-41

- - - - - - - - - -

April 18, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roberto Garcia appeals the district court's grant of summary

judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security's

determination that Garcia is not disabled within the meaning of

the Social Security Act. He argues that his injuries meet the

criteria of a listed impairment, that the ALJ gave insufficient

weight to his subjective complaints of pain, that the ALJ posed a

faulty hypothetical to the vocational expert, and that there was 
No. 95-40887

-2-

not substantial evidence that there were jobs available in the

national economy that he was capable of performing. Our review

of the arguments and the record reveals no error. See Villa v.

Sullivan, 895 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1990). 

AFFIRMED.
No. 00-1120.

#### Koukios *v.*Ganson et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.