alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000948218
<NAME> MINN DAK FARMER'S COOP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                             277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,937
<PP&E>                                         145,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (50,391)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,216
<BONDS>                                         12,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     17,144
<COMMON>                                           121
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,458
<SALES>                                        133,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,993
<CGS>                                           44,364
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

COURTNEY DESMOND ZIELER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3594

[May 14, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

432014CF000380A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### LEDE, INC., Appellant, v. Alton B. WIGGINS, Appellee.

No. 72-321.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION:**

 

I,Eddie Canterbury, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Logan CountyBancShares, Inc.;

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a.       Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.      [Reserved];

 

c.       Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

d.      Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthis registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.       All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  February  28, 2005 |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                | /s/  Eddie Canterbury |   |
|                                | Eddie  Canterbury |
|                                | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Bernardo PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-449.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for appellant.

Taylor, Brion, Buker, Hames, Greene & Whitworth, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and SPECTOR, SAMUEL, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a final judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint for a declaratory judgment. The appellant is the appellee’s insured. The complaint sought a declaration as to appellant’s rights under the policy of insurance. It appears from the allegations of the complaint that the appellant was entitled to maintain the action. The basis for the court’s action in dismissing the complaint with prejudice is stated to be failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have not been favored with an appellee’s brief.1

*378It has often been held that disagreements as to the coverage of insurance policies are a proper subject for declaratory judgment. See Jones v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, Fla.App. 1968, 213 So.2d 502; Zeagler v. Commercial Union Insurance Company of New York, Fla.App. 1964, 166 So.2d 616; Cruger v. Allstate Insurance Company, Fla.App. 1964, 162 So.2d 690. It has also been held that purely factual disputes are not the proper subject of an action for declaratory judgment. See New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Intercity Supply Corporation, Fla.App. 1968, 212 So.2d 110; Burns v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Fla.App. 1963, 157 So.2d 84. Our examination of this complaint convinces us that appellee’s refusal to admit or deny coverage without specifying a reason for the refusal affords a sufficient basis for the circuit court’s jurisdiction under Chapter 86, Fla.Stat., F. S.A. See Jones v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, supra.

Reversed and remanded with directions to deny the motion to dismiss and for an order setting a date for defendant’s answer.

Reversed.

1

.Appellee’s motion to dismiss listed six possible grounds as follows :

> s¡: s]s & ;Js }{;

> “1. Insufficiency of process.

> 2. Insufficiency of service of process.

> 3. Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.

> 4. Lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant.

> 5. Failure to state a cause of action.

> 6. Failure to join an indispensable party.

> “WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that the above cause be dismissed.”

It is noted that this motion does not comply with Rule 1.100(b), ROP, F.S.A.
Exhibit 
32.1.1  Certification Required Under Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Eugene R. McGrath, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated
Edison, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 2003, which this statement accompanies, (the Form
10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Eugene R. McGrathEugene R. McGrathDated:  February 24, 2004
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2011

0321 

# Order

March 29, 2011

142193

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142193 COA: 299488 Kalamazoo CC: 94-000678-FC RONALD TORINO DYSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 19, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.1





Certification


of


PSB Holdings, Inc.


under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  August 15, 2011





PETER W. KNITTPeter W. KnittPresident and CEOSCOTT M. CATTANACHScott M. CattanachTreasurer(Chief Financial Officer)
i: Cnn ccm
ISUS OF |THE UNITED STATES. 1 A
187

SCHEDULE No. 1.-POPULATION, frien —£—) sun
. Enumeration District No... 2-__J
: ame of Inttaton 4
re ar RT
of inaorporated ity, town, or village, within tho above-named dvisi ratole. Vreorn . Ward of city, KX
: Brumeratid by mo on the_£7.__ day of June, 1900, rapicls A Godel bee, Enumeratr Cr
xe ‘RELATION, ‘PERONAL DESCRIPTION. ‘NATIVITY. °  CITIZENBEIP, ‘OcOTATION, TRADE, on ‘EDUCATION, (TaD oF
:
=| || “SBR Tear TE. | ceemgeenee [ Wi
i eo ee eo) Tile yt
# fa Eo | mepmen | megynsen H
ft) “ssumsine HP “we Hild
! jal | |e eld
Yhartix bla. t. \beht~ \aleldcvadd 5 Gecaa | Tena | For _ :
—— thaiahe del Sor ld lod duylerd sal § Vira \Fevae | Yexae | | | ,
“ ieee” Prcdvaad | | amici lamcseiee wn :
wom Labi \Yhle Wblelbveleestdmetiiat| Fras \Frwe Fexan 4
‘
Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau. mn
Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here. |"
‘
+ - ae 28 Zeoyusgt AKG Z yet Vices [Jo
Sed mn Gbiliats. bode ble las yend 4 6 Dugas eeed_| TeX, — fm - : 4"
a an Ganon \ottewan | Vexmy I 0
; [bashed = G. Elaine) eed | Tina | Fxae | Tex sud
3 oog |B telat lard syd bla|0| Grae | Kxar | Sev _
iu il apt hah P| Bliasddmlal | | Cogenc| Una) Cdr | | | |Maledc lal had
oa = ha. weg clriad 2 21 b,tatoncl| bololarcl bro tan | -|
i ae asi opp oh § ehig dated Bg Meodlisle....a\...yed
OD IBN pu VIF as lead reMdetle 4 etendlas | rrmens Goroe| | |_| mae
* Loco! Sphle Bit asles Texas | Berman | Floriels | | | mae
he - acanabeade |b Spht Aleta dd |. |_| Cig Lesaa..\..Sexcoct.....| | ee thot | le yal
ay de pota daviel \Boord YW. Tied Bree Aa
1 Bl FB sey Tecae
m8, lf. Va ¢-
“ Ci
LM So
* Weprole
a Hege  _|4
" Ley
te,
ia Von cr
el Soho Yh |
a Z p
a AEE Leman] i
a ta, lel Fpl Fecewa | Broo aw, hiyd |=
bal Shue 25 1 8|
iad by —
bl KA |
4 Cann
oe mee me |
0 TZ lA, lista i
: ‘ lon sl |
: sll j
« Ble Lh / f
4 pee bal Doxid hier lexis |tlaleaeae lal AeA"
é mst | | Zines | Aeerw | eke |i _| a
the = hfe Pecan |heresnaay | Ya
ti Dxee | Wah! | Geno |
ay Pasc Pran |Grar | eon
3 wg Putas \Fiyne Giz oh lo
ayo) hrelagchs
CATA i Lxos \Gvew | theories
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             991
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,165
<INVENTORY>                                      7,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,518
<PP&E>                                           8,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,161
<BONDS>                                         51,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,664
<SALES>                                         22,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,018
<CGS>                                           15,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,054)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.72)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41616 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. TOMAS RODRIGUEZ-LEDEZMA Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-851-ALL Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Tomas Rodriguez-Ledezma raisesarguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and thejudgment ofthe district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 36925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16356]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP18-982-001.
    Applicants: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amended Negotiated Rate and Non-
Conforming Agreements to be effective 7/20/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/23/18.
    Accession Number: 20180723-5196.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-989-001.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Atlantic Sunrise Tariff Rate 
Filing--Amendment to be effective 8/20/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/23/18.
    Accession Number: 20180723-5211.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-991-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: GT&C Section 3.13 Jul 2018 
Cleanup Filing to be effective 8/23/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/23/18.
    Accession Number: 20180723-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-992-000.
    Applicants: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners.
    Description: 2018 Cash Out Report of Dauphin Island Gathering 
Partners.
    Filed Date: 7/23/18.
    Accession Number: 20180723-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 25, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16356 Filed 7-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# A

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/hvs/annual08/ann08def.html
No. 00-6969.

#### Atkinson *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
SSM SIP final action_List by Reg

1

List of EPA’s Final Actions for All Affected States 

EPA 

Region State 

EPA’s Final Action 

on Petition, to Grant 

or Deny, in Whole or 

in Part 

Does EPA’s final action include a 

SIP call for SSM provisions? 

SSM 

address

prepublic

section 

I Maine Grant Yes B

New Hampshire Deny No BRhode Island Grant Yes B

II New Jersey Partially grant, 

partially deny Yes 

III Delaware Grant Yes D

District of Columbia Partially grant, 

partially deny Yes D

Virginia Grant Yes DWest Virginia Grant Yes D

IV Alabama Grant Yes E

Florida Grant Yes EGeorgia Grant Yes EKentucky Partially grant, 

partially deny 

Yes (for State, not for Jefferson 

County) E.4, E

Mississippi Grant Yes ENorth Carolina Grant Yes (for State and Forsyth County) E.7, ESouth Carolina Partially grant, 

partially deny Yes E

Tennessee 

Grant 

Yes (for State, Knox County and 

Shelby County) 

E.1

(pp. 

V Illinois Grant Yes F

Indiana Grant Yes FMichigan Grant Yes FMinnesota Grant Yes FOhio Partially grant, 

partially deny Yes F

VI Arkansas Grant Yes G

Louisiana Grant Yes G
SSM SIP final action_List by Reg

2

EPA 

Region State 

EPA’s Final Action 

on Petition, to Grant 

or Deny, in Whole or 

in Part 

Does EPA’s final action include a 

SIP call for SSM provisions? 

SSM 

address

prepublic

section 

New Mexico 

Grant 

Yes (for State and AlbuquerqueBernalillo County) G.3, G

Oklahoma Grant Yes GTexas Not applicable Yes G

VII Iowa Partially grant, 

partially deny Yes H

Kansas Grant Yes HMissouri Partially grant, 

partially deny Yes H

Nebraska 

Deny 

No (for State and LincolnLancaster) H.4, H

VIII Colorado Grant Yes 

Montana Grant Yes North Dakota Partially grant, 

partially deny Yes 

South Dakota Grant Yes Wyoming Deny No 

IX Arizona Partially grant, 

partially deny 

Yes (for State and Maricopa 

County, not for Pima County) 

J

(pp. 

California 

Not applicable 

Yes (for Eastern Kern APCD, 

Imperial APCD and San Joaquin 

Valley Unified APCD) 

J

(pp. 

X Alaska Grant Yes K

Idaho Deny No KOregon Deny No KWashington 

Grant 

Yes (for State, Energy Facility Site 

Evaluation Council and Southwest 

Clean Air Agency) 

K

(pp. 

Sum: 

41 states 

Grant or partially 

grant: 

34 states 

SIP call: 

36 states
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.   /s/Leon J. Olivier(Signature)Leon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer  /s/David R. McHale(Signature)David R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date:  February 26, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.