alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,206-01
EX P ARTE DERRICK

BERNARD G ILDON, Appl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2016-11-7717-AIN THE 24T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM CALHOUN COUN TY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated assault and sentenc ed to s i x t ee n y ear s’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Gildon v. State , No. 13-17-00692- CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi J une 7, 20 18) (not designated f

or publication). In three g rounds, Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffe ctive. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief
. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2 d 1 1 4 , 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstance s, additional fac ts2

are neede d. As we held in E x part e Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the t ri al court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel t o respond to Applicant’s g rounds. The trial court may u s e any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)
. Applicant appea

rs to be repr esente d by counsel. I f he is not and the trial court elec ts to hold
a hearing, it shall deter

mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent him at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. A f ter revie wing counsel’s response , the trial court shall make finding s of f a c t a n d c o n c lu s io n s of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was defic ient and Applicant was prejudice d. The trial court shall als o m ake any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s cla ims for habe as cor pus relief
. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolv ed wi thin 90 day s of this order
. A supplemental transcript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of this order. Any extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court.

Filed: Oc tober 23, 2019 Do not publish
Compressor White Paper submission

Dear Sir/Madam:

Attached are Solar Turbines comments for the white paper on methane emissions from compressors. 

Regards,

Anthony Pocengal

Principal Environmental Engineer

Solar Turbines Inc

858-505-8554

Anthony Pocengal <Pocengal_Anthony@solarturbines.com>

Mon 6/16/2014 11:44 PM

To:OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov>; 

 1 attachment

Solar Turbines Comment Letter.pdf; 

Compressor White Paper submission - OilandGas.Whitepapers Page 1 of 1

https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/ 8/27/2014
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing of the Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. Form
10-Q/A (the "Report") for the quarter period ended April 30, 2002, each of the
undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd.



/s/ Dr. Lionel L. Reilly
----------------------------------------
Dr. Lionel L. Reilly
President/Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Neal B. Soderquist
----------------------------------------
Neal B. Soderquist
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.29.2  AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO NORTHEAST UTILITIES INCENTIVE PLAN    The Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan (the Plan), is hereby amended, effective September 12, 2006, as follows:  A. Article II of the Plan, Subsection 2 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:  2. Committee Authority.  The Committee shall have the authority to amend or terminate the Plan as provided in Article XII.  The Committee shall have the sole authority to (i) establish, and review the Companys and the Grantees, as defined below, performance against, annual goals for purpose of the annual incentives to be distributed and determine the individuals to whom grants shall be made under the Plan, (ii) determine the type, size and terms of the grants to be made to each such individual, (iii) determine the time when the grants will be made and the duration of any applicable exercise or restriction period, including the criteria for exercisability and the acceleration of exercisability and (iv) deal with any other matters arising under the Plan.  B. Article XII of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:  1. Amendment and Termination of the Plan.  (a) Amendment.  The Board or the Committee may amend or terminate the Plan at any time; provided, however, that neither the Board nor the Committee shall amend the Plan without shareholder approval if such approval is required by Sections 162(m) or 422 of the Code.  (b) Termination of the Plan.  The Plan shall terminate on the day preceding the tenth anniversary of its effective date, unless the Plan is terminated earlier by the Board or the Committee, or is extended by the Board or the Committee with the approval of the shareholders.  (c) Termination and Amendment of Outstanding Grants.  A termination or amendment of the Plan that occurs after a Grant is made shall not materially impair the rights of a Grantee  unless the Grantee consents, unless the Committee acts under Article XI, Section 2(c), or unless the amendment or termination is required under statute, regulation, other law, or rule of a governing or administrative body having the effect of a statute or regulation.  The termination of the Plan shall not impair the power and authority of the Committee with respect to an outstanding Grant.  (d) Governing Document.  The Plan shall be the controlling document.  No other statements, representations, explanatory materials or examples, oral or written, may amend the Plan in any manner.  The Plan shall be binding upon and enforceable against the Company and its successors and assigns.
Larry Greene AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER

777 12th Street, 3rd Floor * Sacramento, CA 95814-1908 

916/874-4800 * 916/874-4899 fax 

www.airquality.org 

May 18, 2009 

Mr. Michael Guzzetta 

Stationary Source Division 

California Air Resources Board 

PO Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

Subject: State Implementation Plan Revision, SMAQMD Rule 466 

Dear Mr. Guzzetta: 

Enclosed is the information necessary for submittal of Rule 466, Solvent Cleaning, for revision 

to the State Implementation Plan. Rule 466 was adopted by the District’s Board of Directors on 

May 23, 2002. Please also forward the information for this submittal to U.S. EPA. 

If you have any comments or questions, please contact me at (916) 874-4851. 

Sincerely, 

Kevin J. Williams, Ph.D. 

Program Coordinator 

(sent via e-mail) 

Attachments: 

1. SIP Checklist Rule 466 

2. New Rule 466 

3. Public Notice Evidence 

4. Resolution 

5. Public Comments 

6. Rule Evaluation Form 

7. Board Memo 

8. Staff Report (includes responses to comments)
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Coates International, Ltd. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”),
I, Barry C. Kaye, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







Dated:
      May 13, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Barry
      C. KayeBarry
      C. KayeTreasurer,
      Chief Financial Officerand
      Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-3
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000759726
<NAME>              P-B/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-3
<MULTIPLIER>        1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          955,464

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          275,000

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,230,464

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           162,712

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,067,752

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,230,464

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0<F1>

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0<F1>

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0<F1>

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0<F1>

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0<F1>

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

<FN>
<F1>
Registrant adopted the liquidation basis of accounting
on October 1, 1996, and, accordingly, does not 
reflect operations subsequent to October 1, 1996. See 
Note A to the financial statements for further details.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<PAGE>  121


                              Exhibit 12
             Statements of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
           Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends

                                           September 30,            
                              ----------------------------------------
                                 1996           1995         1994   
                              ----------------------------------------

Computation of Earnings:
  Income before income taxes
    and extraordinary item      $11,672,117  $11,278,362  $ 8,798,522
Add:
  Interest expense               40,812,748   32,732,917   25,116,914
                                -----------  -----------  -----------

Earnings as adjusted            $52,484,865  $44,011,279  $33,915,436
                                ===========  ===========  ===========

Computation of Fixed Charges:(a)
  Interest expense (including
    amortization of debt
    expense)                    $40,812,748  $32,732,917  $25,116,914
  Preferred stock dividends(b)      681,842    1,207,166    1,296,372
                                -----------  -----------  -----------
                                $41,494,590  $33,940,083  $26,413,286
                                ===========  ===========  ===========
                                                                            
Ratio of earnings to combined                                              
  fixed charges and preferred                                         
  stock dividends                      1.26x        1.30x        1.28x
                                ===========  ===========  ===========

(a)  No portion  of rental expense could be demonstrated to be
     representative of the interest factor, and therefore none is
     included in fixed charges.

(b)  Preferred stock dividends have been increased to an amount
     representing the pre-tax earnings which would be required to cover
     such dividend requirements.


































                                   121
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1991
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1991
<CASH>                                           4,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,813
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,148
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       406,761
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,813
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,386)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

Perez, Idalia

From: Vanderspek, Sylvia@ARB <Sylvia.Vanderspek@arb.ca.gov>

Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:42 PM

To: Perez, Idalia

Cc: Whitney, Daniel@ARB; Hong, Jeanhee; Steckel, Andrew; Sutkus, Carol@ARB; Lo, Doris; 

Rowland, Scott@ARB; Salardino, David@ARB; Thompson, Douglas@ARB; Lowery, 

Neva@ARB

Subject: RE: reference for Moyer

Idalia

For the projects listed in the Incentives Measure Report, the changes to the 2011 Moyer guidelines were administrative 

in nature and increased project eligibility and the cost effectiveness limit. The changes did not impact any of the 

emission reductions specified in the Incentives Measure Report. The changes also did not impact the emission factors 

associated with the project.

Sylvia
#### McARTHUR JERSEY FARM DAIRY, INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. D. M. WOOLIN & SON, INC., a Florida corporation and Martin Woolin, Respondents.

No. 70-1236.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 28, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 4, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### R. G. MacKAY and Ruth E. MacKay, his wife, Appellants, v. GULF ATLANTIC PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

Nos. 69-17, 69-55.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 5, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 1, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Rule 103. PROCEDURE FOR ADOPTION, FILING AND PUBLISHING RULES

***

(d) Rules of procedure adopted by other courts of the System.

(1) For the purpose of this subdivision, the term ‘‘local rule’’ shall include

every rule, administrative order, regulation, directive, policy, custom, usage,

form or order of general application, however labeled or promulgated, which

is adopted by a court of common pleas [the Philadelphia Municipal CourtCriminal Division,]and the Philadelphia Municipal Court[-Traffic Division,] to

govern practice and procedure. This subdivision shall also apply to any

amendment of a local rule.

***
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37634-37635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Pricing for the Presidential Silver Medals Program

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing pricing for the 
Presidential Silver Medals Program as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Product                           Retail price
------------------------------------------------------------------------
George Washington Presidential Silver Medal.............          $39.95
John Adams Presidential Silver Medal....................           39.95
Remaining Presidential Silver Medals....................           39.95
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 37635]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Veronica Anderson, Program Manager for 
Numismatic and Bullion; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW; 
Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111(a)(2)

    Dated: July 27, 2018.
David J. Ryder,
Director, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2018-16441 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Form 10-Q Issuer
  (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer as of the
dates and for the periods indicated in the Form 10-Q.
 Date: November 9, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Larry L. EnterlineName:
Title:
    
    Larry L. Enterline
Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 9, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Joseph C. Tusa, Jr.Name:
Title:
    
    Joseph C. Tusa, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
#### James MEEKS, a/k/a James A. Meeks, Petitioner, v. W. Rogers TURNER, as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record, in and for Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-983.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 27, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 16, 1971.

William B. Barnett of' Edward J. Hanlon, Jr., & Partners, Orlando, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove and Rodney Durrance, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record in this case and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief requested. See Woodward, Relator v. Edwards, Judge, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 244 So.2d 438, opinion filed December 11, 1970, and State v. Carroll, Fla.App.1970, 240 So.2d 205.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied and the alternative writ is discharged.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. LAND SERVICES INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation, Relator, v. The Honorable Francis J. CHRISTIE, Judge of the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, General Jurisdiction Division, and Robert R. Frank, Respondents.

No. 74-236.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        486,008
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      2,587,335
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                80,551,294
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     15,366,072
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       15,328,300
<LOANS>                                   112,228,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (449,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            220,203,991
<DEPOSITS>                                116,513,549
<SHORT-TERM>                               10,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         1,929,190
<LONG-TERM>                                47,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       39,814
<OTHER-SE>                                 43,133,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            220,203,991
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             2,186,441
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           1,749,663
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            3,936,104
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          1,450,414
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,347,612
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       1,588,492
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             90,767
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             1,186,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               619,228
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    487,223
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  487,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.95
<LOANS-NON>                                   458,548
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              449,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             449,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          449,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        


</TABLE>