alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Larry L. Enterline, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Venturi Partners,
Inc. (the registrant);

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

|                      |  |                       
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2003 |  | /s/ Larry L. Enterline
|                      |  |                       
|                      |  | Larry L. Enterline    

33
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,257,483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,664,041
<PP&E>                                          14,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,521,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          281,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       215,200
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,847,006)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,521,656
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,991,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,498,724)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,985,361)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (13,484,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.63)
        


</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 17, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1333 Lower Tribunal No. 20-896

________________ 

### Cynthia Monger , Appellant,
vs. 

### Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission , Appellee.
An Appeal from the State of Florida, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission. Cynthia Monger, in proper person. Katie E. Sabo, Appellate Counsel (Tallahassee), for appellee. Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Filomia v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc., 271 So. 3d 1199, 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); see also Hood v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 72 So. 3d 273, 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (affirming order and explaining that where the Commission acts within its authority, the appellant has the burden to establish “on appeal any of the grounds, under section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes, upon which the Commission's final order might be set aside”).
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION



I, Allen E. Larson, certify that:



1.
        I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;




2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.




c)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
        The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date:
        January 14, 2008
        
        
        /s/ Allen E. LarsonController and Chief Accounting Officer




---
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <TShumway@TEP.com>

Date: 7/27/2010 12:02 PM

Subject: Re: Springerville Generating Station- Steam Electric ELG Questionnaire Request for 

Extension

Attachments: pic27594.gif; Springerville Generating Station Request for Extension.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has received and reviewed your extension request for the steam

electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the Springerville

Generating Station. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 of

the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please

note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and

remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic27594.gif)

 

 From: <TShumway@TEP.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: <EBakken@Tep.com>, <APulsifer@TEP.com>, <RKane@TEP.com>, <SDevlin@TEP.com>

 Date: 07/26/2010 07:19 PM 

 Subject: Springerville Generating Station- Steam Electric ELG Questionnaire Request for Extension

<<Springerville Generating Station Request for Extension.pdf>>

This letter will be followed by the original copy sent via US Postal

Service.

Tracy Shumway

Department Assistant
Springerville Generating Station

Tucson Electric Power Company

928. 337.7426

 (See attached file: Springerville Generating Station Request for

Extension.pdf)
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header History
 You are here: Census.gov ›
  History ›
  Reference › Publications Skip top of page navigation
 History Main
      Agency History
        Director Biographies
          Census Facilities
          Suitland, MD
          Notable Alumni
      Innovations
        Data Collection
          Technology
      Programs
        Agriculture
          Demographic
          Housing
          Economic
          Geography
          Governments
      Through the Decades
        Fast Facts
          Overview
          Index of Questions
          Questionnaires
          Census Instructions
      Genealogy
        Decennial Census Records
          Other Resources
      Reference
        Data@Museums
          Artifacts
          Lesson Plans
          Legislation
          Maps
          Oral Histories
          Privacy & Confidentiality
          Apportionment
          Publications
 Home Page Archive
        2024
          2023
          2022
          2021
          2020
          2019
          2018
          2017
          2016
          2015
          2014    
      FAQs
        Genealogy
          Agency History
          Demographic
          Economic
          Governments
          Agriculture
          Geography
          Innovations
          Miscellaneous
  In this Section: Publications - Genealogy
  Statistical Abstracts
  Statistical Atlases
  Publications - Demographic
  Publications - Economic
  Historical Housing Data
  Publications - Governments
  Publications - Agriculture
  Working Papers
  Publications - Other
  Executive Reports
 Publications There are many U.S. Census Bureau publications that provide information about the history of the Census Bureau and its programs.  In this section, we provide links to a variety of publications that can be used as a starting point for historical research.  Use the links on the left to find documents and data from past censuses and surveys. In addition, many historical records are available through the National Archives and Records Administration, Federal Depository Libraries, or the Government Printing Office. Librarian at the Folger Library, Washington, DC, 1938Photo courtesy of the Library of Congress
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
No. 11908.

#### The Alva Realty Co. *v.*Beeman.

Decided October 26, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Goulder, Holding & Masten,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. C. L. Shaw*and *Mr. A. D. Licey,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of *Benner*v. *Benner,*63 *511Ohio St., 220.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1603 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1603

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2014

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust for the benefit 
 of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatami Indians, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF INDIAN TRUST LAND.

    (a) In General.--The land taken into trust by the United States for 
the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians 
and described in the final Notice of Determination of the Department of 
the Interior (70 Fed. Reg. 25596 (May 13, 2005)) is reaffirmed as trust 
land, and the actions of the Secretary of the Interior in taking that 
land into trust are ratified and confirmed.
    (b) No Claims.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an 
action (including an action pending in a Federal court as of the date 
of enactment of this Act) relating to the land described in subsection 
(a) shall not be filed or maintained in a Federal court and shall be 
promptly dismissed.
    (c) Retention of Future Rights.--Nothing in this Act alters or 
diminishes the right of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of 
Pottawatomi Indians from 

              

seeking to have any additional land taken into trust by the United 
States for the benefit of the Band.

            Passed the Senate June 19, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00626-CR

Mark Anthony GUAJARDO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR7064

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 9, 2015

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Marc Anthony Guajardo pled guilty to aggravated 

sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to thirty years and a fine of $1500 in accordance with 

the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On September 1, 2015, the trial court signed a certification 

of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO 

right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Guajardo filed a notice of appeal, the trial 

court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The 
04-15-00626-CR

- 2 -

clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id.

25.2(d). 

“In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to 

appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the 

punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor 

and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed 

and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. 

See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a pleabargain case and that Guajardo does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” 

Id. 25.2(d). 

We, therefore, informed Guajardo that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification showing that he

had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; 

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). No such amended trial 

court certification has been filed. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
#### Willie Meiton SHIVERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-903.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; J. W. McCauley, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,816
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,538
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,519
<SALES>                                            400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   917
<CGS>                                              433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     92
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 92
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        92
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32-A

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of True Value Company (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
         Report.


Date: March 3, 2005


/s/ THOMAS S. HANEMANN
----------------------

Thomas S. Hanemann
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ DAVID A. SHADDUCK
---------------------

David A. Shadduck
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to True Value Company and will be retained by True Value Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Curley FAULKNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 25, 1968.

Robert E. Pierce, Public Defender, Lees-burg, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant brings this appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence on the charge of larceny of an automobile. Ap--pellant was convicted and sentenced after voluntarily entering a plea of guilty to the charge of auto larceny. Appellant at that time stated that he was satisfied with the public defender as his counsel.

We must agree with counsel for appellant that the record reflects no error in the decision of the trial court. We therefore must and do affirm the decision of the lower court.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129387 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129387 

 COA: 254186 

Jackson CC: 03-000564-FC 

 CHESTER PHIL LLOYD COLE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk