alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,401
<SECURITIES>                                     7,022
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                       748
<INVENTORY>                                      1,449
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,183
<PP&E>                                           1,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                     520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,941
<BONDS>                                            314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,878
<SALES>                                         21,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,806
<CGS>                                           14,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,885
<INCOME-TAX>                                       526
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,359
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,359
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10(e)**

**The rights andremedies of Ronald D. Ordway under this instrument are subject to the terms andconditions of that certain Debt Subordination Agreement dated as of February 27,2006 between Ronald D. Ordway and Bank of America, N.A., as it may be amendedfrom time to time, which is incorporated herein by specific reference theretoto the same extent as if fully set forth herein.**

SUBORDINATED NOTEAGREEMENT$6,800,000.00
| State of Georgia | ) | February 27, 2006 |
|------------------|---|------------------------|
|             | ) |                   |
| County of Dekalb | ) |                   |

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, theundersigned, Video Display Corporation promises to pay to the order of RonaldD. Ordway (together with any holder hereof, the “Holder”) at any such place theprincipal sum of Six Million Eight Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars($6,800,000.00) plus all accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid balance ofsuch principal amount, at the rate of interest described below, installments asfollows:

| April 1, 2006 |   | $800,000   |   | August 1, 2006    |   | $1,000,000 |
|--------------------|--------|------------|--------|------------------------|--------|------------|
| May 1, 2006   |   | $1,000,000 |   | September 1, 2006 |   | $1,000,000 |
| June 1, 2006  |   | $1,000,000 |   | October 1, 2006   |   | $1,000,000 |
| July 1, 2006  |   | $1,000,000 |   |                   |   |       |

 

Interest on the unpaidbalance hereof shall accrue at an annual rate (computed on the basis of actualdays elapsed over a 360 day year) of the higher of six percent (6%) or theprime rate plus 1⁄4 of one percent (.25%) which interest shall be paid monthlyuntil expiration of the Note. The prime rate for purposes of this Note shall bedetermined on a month to month basis, using the consensus prime rate publishedby the Wall Street Journal effective on the first day of each such month.

The rights and remedies of Ronald D. Ordway under thisinstrument are subject to the terms and conditions of that certain DebtSubordination Agreement dated as of February 27, 2006 between Ronald D.Ordway and Bank of America, N.A., as it may be amended from time to time, whichis incorporated herein by specific reference thereto to the same extent as iffully set forth herein.

The undersigned shallhave the right to repay the indebtedness represented by this Note in whole orin part without premium or penalty.

The Holder is herebygranted a lien on all assets of Video Display Corporation subordinated only tothose liens filed by Bank of America, N. A.

This Note supercedes anyand all demand notes outstanding between the lender, Ronald D. Ordway and theborrower, Video Display Corporation.

[REMAINDER OF PAGEINTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

----

 

This Note is executedunder the hand and seal of the undersigned on the date first above written.
|        | BY:    | VIDEO DISPLAY CORPORATION |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   | Borrower                  |
|   |   |                      |
|   |   | /s/ Michael D. Boyd       |   |
|   |   | Michael D. Boyd           |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
#### Tyrone PARLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-96.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 86 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Dr. Shakil Afridi 

is an American hero and that he should be immediately released from 

custody by Pakistan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2013 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. HIGGINS, 

Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. SALMON, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. 

GOHMERT, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mrs. LUMMIS, and Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ

of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

Dr. Shakil Afridi is an American hero and that he should 

be immediately released from custody by Pakistan. 

Whereas Dr. Shakil Afridi is a hero to whom the people of 

the United States owe a debt of gratitude for his help in 

finding the hiding place of Osama bin Laden; 

Whereas Dr. Afridi, a Pakistani physician, demonstrated the 

universally respected attributes of courage, dignity, and 

honor in aiding the United States in bringing to an end 

the reign of the terrorist leader Osama bin Laden who 

masterminded the September 11, 2001, attacks which 

murdered 3,000 United States citizens; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 86 IH 

Whereas Dr. Afridi is currently imprisoned by the Government of Pakistan, a deplorable situation which constitutes a hostile act by Pakistan against the United 

States and belies the notion that Pakistan is an ally in 

the war against terrorism: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Dr. Shakil Afridi is an American hero 

3 and that he should be immediately released from custody 

4 by Pakistan. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Juan Antonio Deleon, Jr.

, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 29231

- A

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 1 13

- CR * February 23 , 2023

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section


906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Matthew Natalizio, CEO of Qualstar Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and





(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:    September 27, 2002





/s/    MATTHEW NATALIZIOMatthew Natalizio Chief Financial Officer
#### Albert PALMIERI et al. v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE CO.

No. 53547.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: E. M. Frierson, Luther Williams, and the Travelers Indemnity Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany, 275 So.2d 214.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Andrew
A. Farina, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:




(1)           the
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
780(d)); and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
October 28, 2008





/s/  ANDREW A.
    FARINAAndrew
      A. Farina,Principal
      Financial Officer
#### Reuben W. GROOMS and Joyce Grooms, his wife, Appellants, v. INDIANAPOLIS MORRIS PLAN CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-83.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 5, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4368-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2018-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-4368-DR), dated June 8, 2018, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 13, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Jersey is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of June 8, 2018.

Burlington County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2018-15840 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, David H. Roche, certify that:



1.
        I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;




2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.




c)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
        The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date:
        April 14, 2008
        
        /s/ David H. RochePresident and Chief Executive Officer




---
TTS 5 ARPERS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND LABOR-BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
CHF County af Lt om whale oe THIRTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1910—POPULATION sueetno_ 77 B
tetnne i Padhes i HAWAII Enumeration District NO... 75° L¥2 £
Distrct - A serehale NAME OF CITY, TOWN, OR VILLAGE Neat ln bo. Co & = oo tetre cm WARD OR DISTRICT OF CITY >. S Piss, Es
NeAMOE OF GISTYTUTION 3 ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE. 2 ¥ DAY OF tpt maton Igto. Maun Cereiee Fall, spec. actnt.

pat

CL

seeneseeteeeseseseseeeeeseseeses &

LecaTies. SANE PERSONAL DESCRIPTIO‘S.

z rT 7? of cach pereen whee place of abode om April Li T Te lat.¥a 2 | een crs Sh @
ii 4 %

1508, was te this family.
Gene cqrneme Gul, eo Gp Saw came and atti
esr

i,
A i Ue) cere

ene a mente ae

asada Ge. CanadaClin...._lé

7 ie Cr

oe

pitsted sen

Po
+,

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.
#### Doris M. APPERSON (In re Estate of Howard L. Apperson), Appellant, v. Lee H. MOORE, Appellee.

No. Q-441.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 11, 1973.

Edward H. Robinson, of Robinson, Slater & Randle, Jacksonville, for appellant.

S. Gordon Blalock, of Blalock, Holbrook, Lewis, Paul & Isaac, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, the briefs filed herein and oral argument of able counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, .we are of the opinion that Appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error, and the judgment appealed herein is therefore affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., JOHNSON, J., and NESBITT, JOSEPH, Associate Judge, concur.
#### In re ESTATE of Walter F. GRAVES, Jr., Deceased.

No. 71-720.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1972.

Appeal from County Judge’s Court, Indian River County; Miles Mank, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Douglas Esposit et al., Respondents, v Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky, P. C., Appellant.

[655 NYS2d 401]

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant appeals (1), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order, of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated June 22, 1995, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismiss*247ing the complaint, or in the alternative, for a stay pending resolution of an action in the Supreme Court, New York County, entitled *Esposit v Best Med. Supply Corp.,*Index No. 109708/ 93, and (2) from an order of the same court (Berler, J.), entered February 26, 1996, which denied its motion for renewal.

Ordered that the order dated June 22, 1995, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered February 26, 1996, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiffs are awarded one bill of costs.

The defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment was properly denied. The defendant failed to satisfy its burden of showing entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562; *Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.,*3 NY2d 395, 404).

The defendant’s alternative request for a stay of the action pending resolution of *Esposit v Best Med. Supply Corp.*in Supreme Court, New York County, was properly denied as well. Although the actions arose out of the same set of transactions, they do not share complete identity of issues or parties which would warrant granting a stay *(see, e.g., Bennell Hanover Assocs. v Neilson,*215 AD2d 710; *Bridgemarket Assocs. v City of New York,*190 AD2d 561; *Hope’s Windows v Albro Metal Prods. Corp.,*93 AD2d 711; *Abrams v Xenon Indus.,*145 AD2d 362). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### Rossie JONES, Jr., a/k/a Jr. Jefferson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-988.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 12, 1972.

Kenneth A. Studstill, of Twyford & Studstill, Titusville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs filed in this cause. We are of the opinion that the prosecutor’s statements concerning the defendant’s previous criminal activity were properly admitted under the rule enunciated in Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654. The remainder of *250defendant’s arguments are equally without merit. We therefore,

Affirm.

WALDEN, MAGER and OWEN, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
August 31, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00761

- CV In re Commitment of Kevin Johnson,
From the 175th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CI23245 Honorable C atherine Torres

- Stahl , Judge Presiding 

### ORDER

On August 19 , 2020 , this court issued its opinion and judgment in this appeal. A motion for rehearing i s due on September 3 , 2020

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1 After t he due date , Appellant filed a motion for a forty

- five

- day extension of time to file a motion for rehearing and a motion for en banc reconsideration

. Because of the COVID

- 19 pandemic circumstances, Appell ant ’ s motion s are GRANTED

. Appellant’s motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration must be filed with this court not later than Octo ber 19 , 2020

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereu nto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of August, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
Ci
il
eee

oO.

16-2820
Sheet N
1940. |__ Pa A
» Enumerator.

— | (oy ee) rm)
g 3 a wey 4 some seomnos
ai Wody a40ar ewoo

nish-American Wag,

Col. 41. WAR OR MILITARY SERVICE:
Werld War.........-
Spe
bilip
or Boxer Rebellicn_. _._...-.
Spanish-American War
War_
avy. oF
olber war or

pine Insurrection,
and
establichment (A. my,
ser vive oaly —_
expeditice.__._..

(eqeem ouryy-([0y yuoteayndg)
G86} &} peqsom eqeee po sequag

i

TJ

E.D.No. 24-3¢¢

Data
sJpix

Enumerated by me on

S.D. No. __ 9
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY—DO NOT WRITE IN THESE COLUMNS

2
PERSONS 14 YEARS OLD AND OVER—EMPLOYMENT STATUS

+)

>

SS SO Oe = Oe ee ee ee ee ee ee eee = | eee
*

(SqYTQ ITS epnyouy you oc) :

- 4 |
seer 3 an i
aa

———- Bes
it

ah
a

’
‘
‘

3 uosse
om 20994) 408-96 YUVA Jo

xoou SapMp (‘0 ‘OOO'WAM'YEM) | o2 3
WUQM AONTOUINA Tq0

o 40t-46
jo 00a Sump ’ J0m
wedowouo" Jo o7va

BSEESErSUEEOEE
At TR

like the one shown here.

and at
pation at

* in Col. 45 and leave Cols. 46 and 47

that occu

POPULATION SCHEDULE

hysically able to work.

his usual occupation
this, enter

o determine

SIXTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1940
et to pearoand o¢ Which be 18 p

past

USUAL OCCUPATION, INDUSTRY, AND CLASS OF wo
10
of waar.

the
—— person
the
class

—__._

FOR PERSONS 14 YEARS OLD AND OVER

Sato te mek. pis
try and

For a person without previous work experience, enter “‘ None
0

Enter that

HHH

SUES TERN UESUERERICEOATEESES
SS SLSRSISSSS ESE SINGIN SRE ESI Se Se

High school, ist to 4th year___.._ H-1, H-8, #4, 54
College, Ist to 4th year... ©-1,C-2,04 54

Elementary school, istto Sth grade..... 1, 2, dawg
College, %h or subsequent year________--—_.... 0-5

(Name of institution and lines on which entries are made)
Col. 14. HIGHEST GRADE OF SCHOOL COMPLETED;

Unincorporated place -—-—————-s2i plas baving 100 or more inhabitants)

:

aa
:
i
:
:
:
a

ttp://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records

MOTHER TONGUE
r4 A NATIVE

Ward of city
Block Nos./0/- 40 institution
On

Visit A
FOR PERSONS OF ALL AGES

i

Cane tf
eS
S| | x

SUPPLEMENTARY
QUESTIONS
For Persons Enumerated on Lines 2 and 6

frocamsox| novsnsor vara | mau | marion |

6. 6. GOVERERENT Prtwrine Orrice 16—1 1576
f