alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Chemosensory Systems.                    

*Date:*                         August 1, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         M. Catherine Bennett, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5182, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1766,                         *bennettc3@csr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 30, 2018.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-16591 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
State. ACh af “le ce. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERG# at gREAU OF THE'CENSUB” 168 a SUPERVISOR'S DISTRICT NO.

SOUNTY «533 FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE if r rep STATES: 1920—-POPULATION ENUMERATION DISTRICT No

ibgnntey piace... Z aes
PC VV;
TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF COUNTY neni cer NAME OF INCORPQRAT! tp PLACE wn Ai OBR Lot aes ae recipe WARD OF CNY a

NAME OF INSTITUTION === ya ate if GbibtSG7 TH Wy ed Tolontw 6 Maas WHR Ue Sas sds” Wa Mastnsae > ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE... 4E A .. DAY of Lanscacss. =~ 1920. .2c&bh¢

PLACE OF ABODE. NAME RELATION. , . } . NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE.

of each person whose place of abode on [~~ : r ; wn : Flace of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If boru in the United States, ive the state or territory. If of foreign birth, give the place of birth
miei, January 1, 1920, was in this family. r and, in addition, the mother tongue. (Soe insirwctions,)

her of Relationship of th . ° = a . ‘eesiow, or part .
tamily| Enter eurmeme Orst, (hea the given name and middle : te tho Need n ° LON. 2 oTNRE raseee proteanten. of, partie
taord ; of Gaye the tara nrete ag eae — spinner, coleman, lobery

vie + « — — ~. EE —_ - —
ttatien} Lucteds every person living on Janaary 1, 1920. Omit
drem bora since January |, ibto.

Place of birth. ° * Mother tongee. Place of birth.

ee = ee

Be ee UE ARe
, aeae ae Sha eae
3 PH Long A Bete S | 8976

i iwtedns igectge ram ed
eB |
aa :

24

—
.
‘
.

Say *
33

82S 3
bs)

SS

9

SRBRERERBBSES YE we

Lapahimn fi pee

Ss

.
as

x

- BEER DDUDE PDE ;

eS
Bw

“S
“SS

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Ss
&

F366 2.8
Ws

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

..)

WY el Aig PELE A ‘tn: ME E722 |
Nk ihe IO Ale ge Fost
gee eee
A anacs es ie

& a

SSERSSRREBSESES SES
Albert Einstein
Old Grove Rd.
Nassau Point
Peconic, Long Island
August 2nd, 1939
¥.D. Roosevelt,
President of the United States,

White House
Washington, D.c.

Sirs

Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com-
municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran-
ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the in-
mediate future. Certain aspects of the situation which has arisen seem
to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action en the part
of the Adninistration. I believe therefore that it is my duty to bring
to your attention the following facts and recommendations:

In the course of the last four months it has been made probable -
through the work of Joliot in ?rance as well as Yermi and Szilard in
America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction
in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant-
ities of new radium-like elemente would be generated. How it appears
almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.

This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by

air.

o2-

The United States has only very voor ores of urenium in moderate .+
quantities. There is some good ore in Canada and the former Czechoslovakia,
while the most important source of uranium is Belgian Congo.

In view of this situation you may think it desirable to have some
permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
of physicists working on chain reactions in America. One possible way
of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
capacity. Ilis task misht comprise the following:

a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the
further development, end put forward recormendations for Government action,
giving particular attention to the problem of securing a supply of uran-
dum ore for the United States;

b>) to speed uv the experimental work,which is at present being car-

» by
providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with

ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratori

private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause,
and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of incustrial laboratories
which have the necessary equipment.

I understand that Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium
from the Czechoslovakian mines which she has taken over. That she should
have taken such early action mizit perhaps be understood on the ground
that the son of the Geruan Under-Secretary of State, von Weizeiicker, is
attached to the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut in Berlin where some of the
American work on uranium is now being repeated.

Yours very truly,
Dt tee
(Albert Binstein)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                        AMERICAN COIN MERCHANDISING, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE (LOSS) EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Three Months Ended              Six Months Ended
                                                                    June 30,                       June 30,
                                                               1999            1998           1999           1998
                                                           -----------     -----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                                        <C>             <C>             <C>            <C>
Net (loss) earnings ...................................    $  (119,000)    $ 1,373,000     $   55,000     $2,558,000
                                                           ===========     ===========     ==========     ==========

Common shares outstanding at beginning of period ......      6,475,069       6,467,903      6,475,069      6,452,904

     Effect of shares issued during the period ........             --             857             --         10,121
                                                           -----------     -----------     ----------     ----------
Basic weighted average common shares ..................      6,475,069       6,468,760      6,475,069      6,463,025

Incremental shares from assumed conversions:

     Stock options ....................................             --         177,774          6,285        170,506
     Warrants .........................................             --          31,572             --         30,121
                                                           -----------     -----------     ----------     ----------

Diluted weighted average common shares ................      6,475,069       6,678,106      6,481,354      6,663,652
                                                           ===========     ===========     ==========     ==========

     Basic (loss) earnings per share ..................    $     (0.02)    $     0.21     $     0.01     $     0.40

     Diluted (loss) earnings per share ................    $     (0.02)    $     0.21     $     0.01     $     0.38
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,435
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,275
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,326
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,069
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,079
<LOANS>                                         71,553
<ALLOWANCE>                                        681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,380
<DEPOSITS>                                      95,233
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                732
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,274
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 107,380
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,699
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,135
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   525
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,359
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,980
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,988
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,371
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       40
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,305
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,538
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.64
<LOANS-NON>                                        687
<LOANS-PAST>                                       739
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   622
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       25
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  681
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               681
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### ARVIDA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Richard W. DODGE, Carl C. J. Fischer, and Royal Palm Improvement Association, Inc., Appellees.

No. 70-1025.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
M A N D A T E

TO THE 445TH DISTRICT COURT of CAMERON COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 20th day of

October, 2016, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Alberto Alba Villarreal, Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-15-00037-CR (Tr.Ct.No. 2013-DCR-3189-I)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part (Count II)

and reversed and rendered in part (Count I). The Court orders the judgment of the trial

court AFFIRMED IN PART (COUNT II) and REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART

(COUNT I).

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 10th day of January, 2018.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 10.9  CONFIDENTIAL  Redacted. Confidential Treatment of redacted portions requested of the Securities and Exchange Commission.   AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT is made as of December 31, 2008 to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 22, 2008 (the "Agreement"), by and among Greentree Capital Management, L.L.C. ("Seller"), Peter J. Gaess ("Principal"), T.C. Lewis (for the purposes of Section 3.02 only) ("Lewis") and The Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company ("Buyer"). The parties hereto agree that Schedule 1.04 as originally attached to the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced to read in its entirety as follows: Schedule 1.04Illustration of Adjusted Purchase Price Calculation [*]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have duly executed this Amendment on December 31, 2008. BUYER: THE CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY By: /s/ George W. Hamlin, IV      George W. Hamlin, IV 
      President and CEO SELLER: GREENTREE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.  By: /s/ Peter J. Gaess      Peter J. Gaess
      Principal PRINCIPAL: /s/ Peter J. Gaess Peter J. Gaess     2
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.A
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of First Liberty Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File Nos.
33-24733 and 333-00385) of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph
concerning a change in the method of accounting for impaired loans and mortgage-
servicing rights in 1996, dated November 6, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of First Liberty Financial Corp. and
Subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997 and 1996 and for the years ended September
30, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
 
                                          Coopers & Lybrand LLP
 
Atlanta, Georgia
December 19, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          50,934
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 646,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        563,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   646,849
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,147
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    567
<INCOME-TAX>                                       232
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                335
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       335
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(pad i^uu^, W, ie,&9^ 

)EPAr]TMEi\iT OF 

"IUJJ . fs •'^^4jy<J ik'uuK^ ' -irnJtjuuj^ Cu^JjjvJUi -ihi t
#### Lester Paul KETCHUM v. STATE.

No. 36488.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 197 So.2d 321.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Victoria Spark, Appellant. Canter Valvano, L.L.P., Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[736 NYS2d 639]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 31, 2000, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that, inter alia, claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the , finding of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant left her employ*915ment as a legal secretary and receptionist for personal and noncompelling reasons and that she made willful false statements in order to obtain benefits. Claimant quit her job after five weeks, informing the employer that she had found a position that offered more flexible hours, which would make it easier for her to run errands during the day. In her subsequent application for unemployment insurance benefits, however, claimant reported that she had been fired.

Dissatisfaction with one’s work hours has been held not to constitute good cause for leaving employment, especially in cases such as the matter under review, where the claimant was made aware of the required work schedule prior to starting the job (see, *Matter of Hunt [Commissioner of Labor],*286 AD2d 819; *Matter of Anthony [Commissioner of Labor],*257 AD2d 876). Claimant’s assertion that she did not quit her job but was fired on the last day of her employment raised a question of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, *Matter of King [Sweeney],*243 AD2d 802). Under the circumstances presented here, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s finding that claimant made willful false statements to obtain unemployment insurance benefits (see, *Matter of Epps [Commissioner of Labor],*276 AD2d 997). The remaining contentions raised by claimant have been reviewed and found to lack merit.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 4 0 9 6 0 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. M A R C O A N T O N I O G A R C I A

- E S P A R A N Z A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 2 : 0 9

- C R

- 2 8 6

- 1

B e f o r e D A V I S , S M I T H , a n d W I E N E R , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t M a r c o A n t o n i o G a r c i a - E s p a r a n z a ( G a r c i a ) h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. G a r c i a h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f

r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 17, 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-40960 Document: 00511205632 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010