alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 59768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24796]

[[Page 59768]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7612]

In the Matter of the Designation of Jurdan Martitegui Lizaso, 
Also Known as Jurdan Martitegui, Also Known as Arlas, as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Jurdan Martitegui 
Lizaso, also known as Jurdan Martitegui, also known as Arlas, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 20, 2011.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-24796 Filed 9-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (Amounts in Thousands, Except Ratios)
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                                                               Three Months
                                                                                       Ended March 31,
                                                                                       ---------------
                                                                                   1996              1997
                                                                                   ----              ----
<S>                                                                             <C>                <C>
Income before income taxes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        $ 86,281          $172,677

Add (deduct) distributions greater (less) than
    income of unconsolidated affiliates   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           2,642            (1,055)

Fixed charges from below  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          15,101            12,505

Capitalized interest included in fixed charges  . . . . . . . . . . . . .            (122)             (114)
                                                                                 --------       ----------- 

         Earnings available for fixed charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        $103,902          $184,013
                                                                                 ========          ========


Fixed charges:
    Interest expense, including amortization of debt expense/discount   .        $ 13,038          $ 10,676
    Portion of rentals representing an interest factor  . . . . . . . . .           1,941             1,715
    Interest capitalized  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             122               114
                                                                                 --------        ----------

         Total fixed charges  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        $ 15,101          $ 12,505
                                                                                 ========          ========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             6.9              14.7
                                                                                     ====             =====
</TABLE>
#### PENNSYLVANIA LUMBERMENS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Cloyce L. BUZBEE, Appellee. PENNSYLVANIA LUMBERMENS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. John T. BOWLES and Geraldine G. Bowles, his wife, Appellees.

Nos. 67-181, 67-182.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Feb. 16, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50382 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
WARREN ANTHONY JOHNSON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:08

- CR

- 96

- 2

Before JONES , DENNIS , and GRAVES , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Warren Anthony
Johnson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Johnson h a s not filed a respo nse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50382 Document: 00514280652 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2017No. 17

- 50382

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-50382 Document: 00514280652 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2017
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00701- CV

Terr y Christopher Boun ds, App ellant

v. David Fe rnea; Bounds and Pinto Market ing, In c.; and Austrends, Inc., App ellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 250 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-0 7-0 0387 4, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRI ANA, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The parties have filed an agr ee d j o int motion advising this Court that they have
rea ched a full and final settlement ag re em en t an d reque sting that we vacate the district court’s judgme nt, dismiss the case in its entirety , order that eac h party bear its own costs of appea l, and order that this Court’s mandate issue immediately
. We g rant the motion, reinstate the appea l, vacate the district court’s judgme nt, and dismiss the case . See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c) , 42.1(a) (2)( A), 43.2(e) , 43.6.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Goodwin Vac ated a nd Cause Dismissed on J oint Moti on Filed: May

2, 2014
Exhibit 2
Form 10-KSB
VideoPlex, Inc.

                    CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                               TO

                  CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                               OF

                         VIDEOPLEX, INC.

     THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the Certificate of Incorporation of
Videoplex, Inc. is hereby amended as follows:

     1.   The name of the corporation is VIDEOPLEX, INC.

     2.   The original Certificate of Incorporation was filed on
August 29, 1983 in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Jersey.

     3.   There has been no prior amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation.

     4.   The amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
amends Article Four of the original Certificate of Incorporation
so as to provide as follows:

          "4.  The aggregate number of shares of stock which the
          corporation shall have authority to issue as 10 million
          shares of one class of common, capital stock, with no
          par value."

     5.   The amendment was approved by the unanimous consent of
the Board of Directors in lieu of meeting; was proposed to the
shareholders of the corporation; the shareholders of the
corporation unanimously approved the amendment at a special
meeting called for that purpose on the 2nd day of October 1984.

     6.   The amendment is to become effective immediately upon
filing of the certificate of amendment.

     7.   All other provisions of the certificate of
incorporation remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the President of
the corporation, hereby certifies that the foregoing certificate
of amendment to the certificate of incorporation was executed
pursuant to approval by the Board of Directors and by the
shareholders of the corporation on the 2nd day of October, 1984.


                                   /s/ Martin S. Horak, President

                               E-4
<PAGE>
Free Inhabitants in <7 Zc Leer p77. im the Oounty of LL Lic Ee-8

&
>
*
f

"
seed

%

& , ) ane ;
enumerated by me, on the a dl day of Caeait AW). Mat thay Ass't Marsi:: 3

—_——-

|

rear.

within the ye

=]

e
&

3
}

Z
ie |

Whether deaf e
dumb, blind, in. #4
idiotic, paup-;, :

iw

=| Profession, Occupation, or Trade Puace or Bintn.

bered
in the order of
visitation.

| The Name of every Person whose usual place

White,
black, or
mulatto. !

of abode on the first day of June, 1850, was of each Male Person over 15 Naming the State, Territory,

g-houses

BP
a
a

years of age. or Country. “convict.

—r) | Color, 1

in this family.

‘year.
Attended School

order of eat ae

in the order of
‘visitation.
Value of Real Estate
Persotis over 20 y'rs of age
who cannot read & write. |
order of visitation,

numbered in the

‘| Wamilies num

Married within U

we

Families numbered
Age.

Dwellin

—o

On | Sex.

|

3
Thain Wis |
Lzate Co LZ | | | : , LZ

LE a. Ceca ftzLC Li te 3 Fees 12047 Wy

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

=i
eS
=
=
rs
oo

4

Auahivgy

|

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

|

Mitzeeaz “ 42 2a : |

WY Zs Zz | Ze |
en

Lin oe NIN
£7 LEL22 DZe2LLe CAE
#### Burnerd HORWITZ, Appellant, v. GROVPAC, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-427.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 11, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1973.

*577Quarles & Mills, So. Miami, for appellant.

Prunty, Ross, DeLoach & Olsen, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action upon a contract in which the defendant agreed to sell certain land to the plaintiff. The chancellor found that the plaintiff failed to tender the balance of the contract purchase price which according to the contract was to be computed upon a price of $5,500 per net acre as established by a surety to be furnished by the seller. Final judgment was accordingly entered in favor of the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

We think that the chancellor’s treatment of plaintiff’s complaint, styled as an action for declaratory relief, as in fact an action for specific performance of the contract was correct. Garner v. DeSoto Ranch, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 150 So.2d 493; Swain v. Reliable Insurance Company, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 862; New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Intercity Supply Corp., Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 110.

Plaintiff argues that the chancellor erred in finding that he should have made a tender of the amount of the purchase price which he considered to be payable under the terms of the contract. He contends that he should not be required to make a tender only of what he believed to be the purchase price, and a tender would have been a vain and useless act because Grovpac, Inc. would not have accepted it. We cannot agree.

The basic dispute between the parties involved a discrepancy in two surveys of the property. Grovpac’s survey was completed on October 24, 1971 and showed a total of 18.62 acres. On October 28, Grov-pac communicated to plaintiff’s attorney that the closing date for the transaction would be November 3, 1971. The plaintiff then contacted defendant’s surveyor and obtained a recomputation of the acreage at 17.002 acres. The chancellor noted that the acreage was susceptible of ascertainment as of the date of closing, and he found that defendant had not acted unreasonably in setting the November 3 closing date.

Grovpac points out that the facts of this case are analogous to the case of Glave v. Brandlein, Fla.App.1967, 196 So.2d 780, in which the point on appeal was whether or not as a condition precedent to an action for specific performance of a land contract the purchaser must make a cash tender. The court therein recited the general rule as follows:

> “As a condition precedent to specific performance the seeking purchaser must either pay the contract sum; tender it; establish that he is ready, willing and able to do so; or establish that he has been excused from so doing.”

We have concluded that the trial court was correct in determining that plaintiff *578was obligated in this case to make a tender of the purchase price prior to bringing this action.

Therefore, for the reasons stated and upon the authorities cited, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                      EXHIBIT 15
                  AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


May 14, 1997

Union Pacific Resources Group Inc.
801 Cherry Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. for the periods ended March
31, 1996 and 1997, as indicated in our report dated April 16, 1997; because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-22655 on Form S-3
and No. 333- 22613 on Form S-8.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Fort Worth, Texas





                                     - 24 -
Mar 14 12 09:50a ReepBeil& Laird 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

3 

10 

11 

12 

13 

1^ 

15 

16 

17 

13 

19 

20 

21 

22 

22 

24 

Richard A. Recp, Esq. 

REEP. BEL L & UMRD. P.C. 

2955 Stockyard Roacl 

P.O. Box 16960 

Missoula, Monlana 59808-6960 

Telephone: (406) 541 -4100 

Facsimile: (406)541-4101 

Attorneys for Annorcoat USA 

4065414101 

ifUNSPORTATION 

.jCr;[:: OPERAtlONS 

P-2 

m 'm q P 1: 51 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEAI^TNGS 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 

LN THE MATTER OF: 

ARMORCOATUSA. 

) FAACaseNo.20lONM7l0045 

) Administrative Law Judge 

) Richard C. Goodwin 

) 

ARIVIORCOAT USA'S REQUEST FOR 

WITHDR-WVAL OF REQUEST FOR REARING 

COMES NOW, Aimorcoat USA and pursuant to the Settlement Agreement reached in 

tliis matter hereby requests that its request for hearing be withdrawn. 

DATED Uiis / 9 day of iMarch, 2012. 

REEP, BEL L 

Ri<5hard A. Recp 

Attorneys for Armorcoat USA 

PAGE 1. 
Mar 14 12 09:50a Resp Bella Laird 4065414101 P.3 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

25 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

2-1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that on the IH " day of March, 2012. a tnie and 

correct copy of the foregoing was served upon the following a5 indicated: 

[)(] U.S. Mail 

[ 1 Hand Delivery 

[ 1 Federal Express 

pC] Facsimile 

[ ] Certified Mail, Rcturu Receipt Requested 

f, 

J U.S. Mail 

] Hand Delivery 

I ] Federal Express 

I ] FacsimiJc 

I j Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbcr Wrigiit Building, Suite 2W1000 

Federal Aviation Administration 

SOO Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Kyle E. Lomazow 

FAA Office of Regional Counsel 

1601 Lind Avenue SW 

Renton, Washington 9S057 

uo.fiiA Y^jju Lbi/ n^\j^b\ 

PAGE 2.
Page No a seo Inquiries numbered 7, 16, ae Meteor ee ae ina Inquiries numbered: 11,-12, 15, 16, 17,19, and 20 are to be answ
is, 7 merely by an affirmative mark, as /.

Sonepute 1.—Inhabitants in Liat of Aasscdppdde 3 in the County of Lew lote

of Liwruchtethe, enumerated by me on the we day of _faly

1870.
ve oy Office: . ye Cathe AO PM diam Ass’t Marshal.

| ConstituTIONAL |
RELATIONS.

ls Ae

Whether deaf |i ©
and dumb, |= 4

blind, insane,
or idiotic,

oO
E |
yA
iy
a

e ls
fdged on
than re-

bh -_

of 21

The name of every person whose

place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

Age at last birth-day. If

ive months
us, yy

in fractions, fi Pe

nd apw
o vot

or Trade of each person,
male or female.

or Territory of U. 8.; or the
Country, if of foreign birth.

of visitation.
of U.S.

——_-—

the order of visitation.
Females (F.)
Citizens of
21 years of age

month (Jan., Feb., &c.)
wards,

olor.—White (VV.), Black| :
(B.), Mulatto (M.), Chi-
nese (C,), Indian (1.)

month (Jan., Feb., &c.)

other ground
bellion or o

hoee righ
denied or ab

ears ofage

M
y
¥

="
©
s|
—}

under 1 year,
ale Citizen

Families, numbered In the order
Jf married within the year, state
| Attended school within the year,|

Value of Persona) Estate.
If born within the year, state

| Sex.—Males (M.),

=
or
7)

Cannot wriie.

bea haere, numbered ip

Male

—

O | Mother of foreign birth,

—

|
|

—"
oo
a
Or

4

~

ped
5

x

K

.

ON

—

ES) a bb

co fF NHN OF OHO eke WD WW

—s N IN ~ iN N ~ N ~ N nN | oS Cannot read.

—

RAR

hake Sate = St os

—

RR RR KR

Ss

Doass dishes

i Opesaana Bie Be partes ri \

\

~NERRRR RRR RRR

scan

Y Vn 4 4 (i —

bs Goud Segige bd, = 4
an
/

NI

DjLauuy datas ak.
fe: a 2f | -\2 Blt £0,
QS | aa, 24, Si Cr rlonnAb? MA)
gn Historic census records are maintained and released by |
re tee i 8 —" “
the National Archives and Records Administration,

as, pila not the U.S. Census Bureau.

a

Lui j , , z Visit http:/www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
LLL available records like the one shown here.

42 Li zal Aa. 7 ==.

Ly Pass
Prcaushe fie

No. of dwellings, _ a No. of white females, ee No. of males, foreign born, i”
“‘ families, _ 4 “ “ colored males, “*« “ females, “ « f S=
| «« “ white males, / 20 «4 “* females, “ © blind,

ya is | Shas Ace Oy 32 eabe Wes .
a: ee) Oe! ene Se ee
Tos aS PS ea
oo ~
is a tree

mi ow oo

' . as M ‘ “2 < P| 4 é .
Fite, dN. 4, eat COSA SU Cth er RT ER ie .
ee. iene: mance mimasica aeabesias inenasins Wenstinads gm Ne hee h as
iu — cues raoe Bon slaees sow 5 a4) sey nt uta tt = — t ws
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia
ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals hereby passes

the followi

ng order: A14A1954. BRIDGE S et al. v. AMS SERVIC ING, LL C et al. An appeal in the captioned case was docketed in this Cour

t on June 19, 2014. The Appellan

ts’ brie f, includ

ing enum eration of

errors, was due to be filed within 20 days after the case was docketed – no later than July 9, 2014. Cour

t of Appea

ls Rules 22 (a); 23 ( a). Appellants di dnot comply with the rules of this Court requiring that a brief an d enum eration of errors b e filed w ithin

20 days after th e case wa s docketed, nor did Appell ants reque st an exten sion of tim e before expiratio n of the 20- day fi ling deadline. Accordi

ngly, the appeal in the ca ptioned cas e is DIS MISSED . Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certi fy that the above i

s a true extra ct from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Wit ness my signature a nd the seal of said cour t hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 07/29/2014 July 29, 2014
Table 11.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit, for the United States and Regions:
                  First Quarter 2002 and 2001

(Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                   First quarter 2002


                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      9.2       7.3       8.3      11.5       7.7
      For rent...........................      2.9       2.0       2.8       3.6       2.6
      For sale only......................      1.0       0.7       1.2       1.2       0.9
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.6       0.6       0.7       0.6       0.6
      Held off market....................      4.6       3.9       3.6       6.1       3.7
        For occasional use...............      1.5       1.1       0.7       2.3       1.5
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      0.9       0.9       0.7       1.1       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.2       1.9       2.2       2.8       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.9       3.9       2.9       2.5       2.4

    Occupied.............................     88.0      88.8      88.8      86.0      89.9




                                                   First quarter 2001

Type of housing unit
                                           United    North-     Mid-      South      West
                                           States     east      West

All housing units........................      100       100       100       100       100

    Year-round vacant....................      8.9       6.9       7.8      11.4       7.6
      For rent...........................      2.6       1.8       2.4       3.4       2.1
      For sale only......................      0.9       0.7       1.0       1.2       0.7
      Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy.      0.7       0.5       0.6       0.7       0.7
      Held off market....................      4.7       4.0       3.9       6.1       4.0
        For occasional use...............      1.5       1.1       0.7       2.2       1.7
        Temporarily occupied by persons
        with usual residence elsewhere...      1.0       0.9       0.9       1.1       0.8
        For other reasons................      2.3       2.0       2.2       2.8       1.5

    Seasonal vacant......................      2.9       4.4       2.6       2.6       2.5

    Occupied.............................     88.2      88.7      89.5      86.0      90.0
#### Jerry Franklin BECKWITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43804.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied, 275 So.2d 617.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Virginia L. WALDROP, Appellant, v. Calvin C. WALDROP, Appellee.

No. R-195.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 12, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leroy WHITE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53955.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 1973.

In re: Leroy White applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. Insufficient showing to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.