alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11180.

#### Freericks, doing business as the New Mohn Laundry, *v.*Drilling, an Infant, by etc.

Decided September 28, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Frank FI. Freericks,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Karch & Quasser*and *Mr. Thos. L. Michie,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Spear, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
congreSr ot toe 'nU teDb tatet

* *astin gton, € 20515 #tr7 -FC, October 30, 2000

Dear Colleague: . , .. E-fv/S/<-cg 2-

Want a Halloween fright that will stay with you, your family, and everyone in America for their entire lives?

Which washer in Sunday's ad

: :can jI we still buy under a

-F^ {DoE proposed mandate?

HOTPOIMPTbya / >

o *wst LJmit 1 pair._ - Large capacity aer 2 wash cycles. #6012004 Mfr. #VULLR120A or Large capacity automatic electric dryer

Autormaic dy control. #7011006 Mr. #NLLR113EWO

;X ^ - 2 - 0--:-i r'^ - - :10 - _ - 0 : % cash back

i'"' ' '' -tX-t ;

< _-,r-o . ....

.. * "'-"* '~Whi~~~RlDo~l ~only $10 a month: -..-......... ~ ............ Super capacity washer

8 wash cycles, 2 speed

combinations. #6813719 --.--- ~ =---__~ - ~/ -- -- -Mfr. #LSR8233JO

.^^ = = = = =^ :^ ; * ^ i

~~^"*, 29999

only $10 a month.

5-cycle electric dryer

5.9 cu.ft. drum, 4 temps. #7809711 Mfr. #LER5644JO

La'rgest Capacity . G tra. Similar to model

You Can Buy: i - 3.3 Cu.Ft. .

.CAPA=TL.US 0 PU ; I0 :

-0---- -

I0% cash back :- 120 loads of

with th is pa ir

3. pay.. -.. 2 only2 $1 omonth 329you 2 99

Heavy-duty 3-speed Giant capacty heavy ty ony 10month only $10 a month

combination washer Auger ele dryer D ruiht, light ctric dryer agitator 2 speed combinations 6;0 cu.ft. capacity for better rollover. automatic or time-controlled cycles. for delicates 6506712 dryer drum. #7506715 #6764714 Mfr. #LNC 6764A71 #7784717 Mfr. #LNC7764 Gas extra. Mf #WJSR1070AWW Mfr. #DBXR43EAWW Gas ext# Mfr. #WJSR1070AWW Mfr. #DBXR453EAWW Gas ext a.

plus...$2-SlOO m anufacturer

'"'^"^--b~t-^ :r -' ' ' ' ~t ,-soe---- e . .ea 

j -- ~~ , 120 ... o s f

->. -I'I iEFRIGIDAIRE i 120 Ic of,,

your choice j 10% cash bac 10% cash bat k

-27T ,-- , $399 36h- 9

on.$10 a month after $30 mal-in rebat, only $10 a month

Super capacity o -Electridryer you pay$429. Electric dryer! 17512718

washer s69s807 #770808 Washer #6512715 Mfr. #DPSR465AWW Mfr. #FWS96g9HW M. #DE7970EW Gas extra. Mfr. #WMSE4190AWW Gasextra.

; .. ,, -e -- --.. . .. ..- . I I D-. . , ' -. by- , InE 

your choice l -r i

^ : .:: f ; . .. G

t ^ B tf l O ' ' ' - ^ ^ '*'* *** "' ^ -: .' I I!

regular or delicate fabrics. 3 temperature settings washer #6340712 settings #7340715 washer #6371714 #73717174A #6201714 Mfr. #RAX7244JQ #7201717 Mf. #REX4634J Gas extra. .Mfr.MAV6200WW: Mfr#M 200 s a Mfr. MAH4 AWW

18 'See pages 18-19 for payment credit details. All FREE and RE TE offe with purchase of Items shown; coupons details In tore. Appliances shown may not be displayed In all stores, but are available on customer order.

ANSWER ON REVERSE *

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 73FFC
WEmAsV8TDW-A';73 -F - F-C

On. the y $988.99 (before tax) model

Only the $988.99 (before tax) model

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 73FFC
# m3-outp-invp
#### John Wesley WARD et al., Appellants, v. Theresa OCHOA, Appellee.

No. 72-1000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 27, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Okeechobee County; James E. Alderman, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### John HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-506.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 27, 1972.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It appears that appellant filed his notice of appeal on June 9, 1971. However, his judgment and sentence was not entered until June 14, 1971. Thus, the notice failed to confer jurisdiction upon this court and must be dismissed upon authority of Dam v. David, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 338; Martin v. Martin, Fla.App.1971, 258 So.2d 6; and State ex rel. Herring v. Allen, Fla. 1966, 189 So.2d 363.

Appeal dismissed.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Pa e No TY» | 1 Inquiries numbered 7, 16, and 17 are not to be asked in respect to infants. Inquiries numbered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20 aro tobe answered (if at all)
6 . a merely tp an nfirmative mark, as /.

SCHEDULE ji. inhabitants Oe MM d - hd Lilie — the County of EEE. < *__, State

of /Ze b. Juca_g enumerated by me on the Le Ry t ialy , 1870.

Post € Wficé: | ? ALLEL BS = 4 bate VILL =a Marshal.

VALUE OF REAL ESTATE
OWNED. pismrraat|

CONSTITU “OXAL
| RELATIONS.
=a

o
:
:
cS
Z

————

Whether deaf
an{i dumb,
blind. insane,

numbered in

Place of Birth, naming State
or Territory of U. S.; or the

Country, if of foreign birth.

Profession, Oceupation,
or Trade of each person,
male or female.

| The name 5f every person whose
| place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

Feb., &¢.)

rear, give months
ight to yote is
© abridged on}

ge ondupwards,
other grounds than ro-

of visitation.

be . .
or idiotic.

|

|

f

|

18

in fractions, thus, ¥4).

ne-houses,
the order of ylsitation,
Females (I.)

Male Citi
a 2:)

If married within the yenr, state
Attended school within the year,

If born within the year, state
month (Jau.,

month (Jan., Feb., &e.)
Male Citizens of U.S. of

21 years of age and up-

bellion or other crime.

(B.), Mulatto (M.), Chi-

Color: White (W.), Black| 3
nese (O,), Indian (I.)

Age at Inat birth-day, If

under!

Sex.—Males (M.),
Father of forcign birth.
Mother of foreign birth.
Cannot read.
Cannot write.

years of

whe
denied

Dwelli
«, | Families, numbered in the onler |

- !

@ | Value of Neal Estate,
© | Value of Personal Estate.

>

a
or
oO
—"
Py
ped
tw
oe
iv)
ee
ne
—_
=>)
=
=)
=
S
io

Lert ELLL2LLL WA Lh fe ZZ
x3 SL, ct FY ee
= eee 1 BLL : Va

ss th acd ha 7 /

VAY Led Loo, Historic census records are maintained and released by

. rae 7 the National Archives and Records Administration,
Catt Vip

A not the U.S. Census Bureau.

eS

ee

) Meg Hai,

12

(le ‘ci, Nisit http:/www.archives.gov for more information about publicly

13) | : Pee oF available records like the one shown here.
¢ | T77 : Sicthisr. axe ee 7 aca
= ma, Wa age Miés om A'IZ¥ “ a

1G |

Z

LL

LeL< Gh ze | Y// | 4 | V4
Sa

Qytice wait A, | Azz
AL Mote ps

4 Kc

No. of dwiellings, _ No. of white females, ey xs of males, foreign born, me
‘ * furnilies, y  “\colored males, _ ‘ females, ‘“‘ = © god
id white males, JA \ Se «e females, ty * blind,

J
$

—-

fre
No. 11945.

#### The State of Ohio *v.*Deiter.

Decided October 19, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court *505of Pike county.

*Mr. James A. Douglas,*prosecuting attorney, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. S.*L. *Patterson*and *Mr. C. PI. Henkel,*for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment of the court of common pleas affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry.

This court is of opinion that the circuit court did not err in refusing to reverse the judgment of the court of common pleas in so far as it overruled the defendant’s plea in abatement, this court being of opinion that the question of the legality of the selecting and drawing of the grand jury may not be raised by plea in abatement to the indictment, and with respect to that holding the said judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

But this court is of opinion that the discharge of the petit jury, and the ordering of a new petit jury, was within the discretion of the trial court, and it not appearing that such discretion was abused, or that the petit jury which tried the defendant was not an impartial nor disqualified jury, no error was committed by the trial court in that behalf, and the judgment of the circuit court in reversing the judgment of the court of common pleas for said alleged error is hereby reversed, and that of the common pleas affirmed.

Summers, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Fourth Quarter 2004 and 2005
                 (in percent)


                                    Rental vacancy rates


                          Fourth       Fourth          90-Percent
         Area             quarter      quarter   Confidence Interval (&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>
                           2004         2005     of 2005 rate of difference


United States..........        10.0          9.6          0.4          0.5

  Inside Core-Based
     Statistical Areas�        NA            9.4          0.5           NA
    In central cities..        NA            9.4          0.6           NA
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........        NA            9.3          0.7           NA
  Outside Core-Based
    Statistical Areas..        NA           10.9          1.6           NA

 Northeast.............         6.8          6.7          0.7          0.8
 Midwest...............        12.4         12.3          0.9          1.0
 South.................        12.5         11.4          0.9          1.0
 West..................         7.2          7.0          0.8          0.9



                                    Homeowner vacancy rates


                          Fourth       Fourth              90-Percent
         Area             quarter      quarter   Confidence Interval (&plusmn;)<sup>a</sup>
                           2004         2005     of 2005 rate of difference

United States..........         1.8          2.0          0.1          0.2

  Inside Core-Based
     Statistical Areas�        NA            2.0          0.2           NA
    In central cities..        NA            2.7          0.3           NA
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........        NA            1.7          0.1           NA
  Outside Core-Based
    Statistical Areas��        NA            2.1          0.3           NA

 Northeast.............         1.2          1.6          0.3          0.3
 Midwest...............         2.2          2.4          0.3          0.3
 South.................         2.0          2.2          0.2          0.3
 West..................         1.5          1.7          0.2          0.3
    aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence interval is, in
     relation to the size of the estimate, the less reliable the estimate.
NA Not available.  Core-Based Statistical Area data for 2005 and later are not comparable to earlier data.  Beginning
in first quarter 2005, the Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey is using the new metropolitan and micropolitan
statistical definitions which were announced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in June 2003, and were based on the
application of the 2000 standards to Census 2000 data.  OMB announced updates as of December 2003, based on application of the
2000 standards to more recent Census Bureau estimates.  The December 2003 definitions are available at:
http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html.
Opinion issued July 6, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00960-CR

———————————

LANCE TYLER CAMPBELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1635723

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Lance Tyler Campbell appeals from his conviction by a jury. 

Appellant was sentenced to seven years in the Correctional Institutions Division of 

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal. 
2

During a hearing held on December 20, 2022, appellant’s trial counsel stated 

that appellant did not wish to appeal and did not request counsel on appeal. 

Appellant’s trial court moved to withdraw and the trial court granted this motion, 

leaving appellant pro se. Although a clerk’s record was filed, the court reporter 

stated that no appellate record had been requested. 

The Court issued an order on March 21, 2023, abating the appeal and 

remanding to the trial court for a hearing to determine if appellant wished to pursue 

his appeal, and if so, whether appellant was indigent and entitled to appointment of 

counsel and a reporter’s record at no cost to appellant. A supplemental clerk’s 

record was filed on April 28, 2023, containing a finding in the trial court’s docket 

sheet that appellant appeared at the hearing by zoom and stated that he no longer 

wished to pursue his appeal. A hearing record filed on April 21, 2023 contained 

appellant’s statement that he does not want to appeal his conviction.

Appellant has not filed a motion to withdraw the appeal or to dismiss the 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). However, based upon appellant’s testimony at 

the hearing, appellant does not want to continue his appeal. Based on this 

testimony, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend operation of Rule 42.2(a) 

in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2; Jeffery v. State, No. 14-13-00987-CR, 2014 

WL 2039981, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 15, 2014, no pet.) 
3

(based on appellant’s testimony, court suspended operation of Rule 42.2(a) and 

dismissed appeal).

We dismiss the appeal. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00381-CV

In the Estate of Larry Ronald Neal, Deceased § § § § From County Court at Law No. 2 of Wise County (PR-3670) January 4, 2018 Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth



### JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

We withdraw our November 9, 2017 opinion and judgment and substitute the following. This court has again considered the re cord on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in part of the tr ial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is reversed in part. We reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment that awarded Larry Neal’s real proper ty to Valorie Jean (Neal) White and render judgment that Larry’s real property passed through intestacy to his heirs. It is further ordered that appellee Gary Neal shall pay all of the costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth Chief Just ice Bonnie Sudderth
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 21


                           Subsidiaries of Registrant


          The registrant owns 100% of the issued and outstanding Capital Stock 
of TruServ Real Estate Agency, Inc., TruServ Specialty Company, LLC, TruServ 
Acceptance Co., Inc., TruServ  Logistics Company, and General Paint and
Manufacturing Co., all Illinois  corporations, indirectly through TruServ
Acceptance, Co., 100% of the issued  and outstanding Capital Stock of Warner
True Value Hardware, Inc., a Minnesota  corporation and indirectly through
TruServ Real Estate Agency, Inc., 100% of  the issued and outstanding capital
stock of True Value de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.,  a Mexican Corporation. The
accounts of these subsidiaries have been  consolidated with the registrant's at
December 31, 1997, and December 28, 1996.
        
          In January 1992, the registrant formed a Canadian subsidiary, Cotter 
Canada Hardware & Variety Company, Inc., owning 100% of the issued and 
outstanding Capital Stock. Indirectly, through this subsidiary, the registrant 
owns 100% of the issued and outstanding voting Preferred Stock of the 
Canadian cooperative, Cotter Canada Hardware and Variety Cooperative, 
Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley J. Gadek, Senior Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1)             | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and                   
|--------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2)             | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                |                                                                                                                                                     
|August 13, 2003 | By:                                                                                                                                                 
|                |                                                                                                                                                     
|                |                                                                                                                                                     
|                |
Schneider Electric 

Manufacturer Stance – National Impact Analysis● Proposal – using EL2

● Equipment Class 4 (DL7 and DL8)

●Quads of savings

– EL2 1.09– EL4 1.24

●NPV 3% ($ billions)

– EL2 7.51– EL4 8.00

●NPV 7% ($ billions)

– EL2 1.88– EL4 1.85

●Manufacture expenses

Double between EL2 and EL4

● NEMA PREMIUM = TSL7 (EL3 & EL

● Equipment Class 4 (DL7 and DL8)

●Quads of savings

– TSL7 – TSL2 

●NPV 3% ($ billions)

– TSL7 – TSL2 

●NPV 7% ($ billions)

– TSL7 – TSL2 

●Manufacture expenses

Double between TSL7 and TS
Schneider Electric 

Change Manufacturer Stance to below(with scaling factor modified for 15, 750, and 1000kVA)

kVA Efficiency kVA Efficiency

15 97.70% 15 97.3725 98.00% 30 98.24

37.5 98.20% 45 98.41

50 98.30% 75 98.6075 98.50% 112.5 98.73

100 98.60% 150 98.82167 98.70% 225 98.95250 98.80% 300 99.02333 98.90% 500 99.14

750 99.26

1000 99.33

Equipment Class 3 Equipment Class 4

Efficiency @ 75°C and 35% Loading
Schneider Electric 

Manufacturer Data●DL7 @ EL3 or TSL7

● LCC savings: 1630 mean and 1567 median (EL4: 1695/1630)● 97.6% of consumers would see benefit (EL4: 97.3%)● Allows manufactures to build with multiple materials but also strive for lowest cost solution whi

EL4 units being offered into market based on modeling data

●DL8 @ EL2 or TSL7

● LCC savings: 2448 mean and 2297 median (EL4: 2632/2400)● 94.54% of consumers would see benefit (EL4: 84.59%)
Schneider Electric 

Modeling Data for Lowest Cost(using the exclusion scenario)

● dEL 3

● Still allows M6 

manufactures

● M4 and M3 cos

larger manufactmaterial

● M4 and M3 allow m

offer dEL 4 and dEearly adopters 
Schneider Electric 

Modeling Data for Lowest Cost(using the exclusion scenario)

● dEL 2

● Still allows M6 

manufacturers

● M5, and M3 co

larger manufactmaterial(M4 also an opt

● M3 allow manufact

to market for early 
Schneider Electric 

Modeling Data for Lowest Cost

● Comments

● New materials and process are low cost solutions for DL7 and DL8

●Manufacturer have ability to use the H0 and SA1 material and if model is correct – will m

towards since shows as lowest cost products at dEL2/3 and dEL3
|
anaes OF Abiferasicte eee DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS [D1—378)

County adit maak ee CENSUS OF THE UNITED SUATES: ee eee £58

VGE _... WARD oF city Metseaate#e a

TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF COUNTY... Vy Moker 2 NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE ... tasked.
“[insert proper name and, ec Rees slay 0 of class, as city, village, town, or borough. See insiructinns,)

( wtt yA 4
NAME OF INSTITUTION... Smee es ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE ae 132 ar > athe to ony OF . Bez added. 1920. Male, dy ISS Sa ENUMERATOR... *

(Insert name of institution, ifany, and ‘Indicate the lines on whieh the entries are made. See instructions. i>

CITIZENSHIP. | EDUCATION, NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE.

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumersied. If born inthe Ualted States, elve the state or territory. If of forelen birth, cire the place of birth
and, in additioa, the mother toneue. (See instractions.)

OCCUPATION.

—

peak

1
il

PLACE OF ABODE, NAME RELATION,

—— ae mat of each person whose place of abodo on

Homse | Mra F January 1, 1920, was In this family.

thamber
or farm, | {pelt it Ente first, then the given mame and middle Relationship of this
b ing unter suraame Gr Li porate to the head of

ole. Initial, fan

(See iy araas Ss —
ImatrBe- | oF vis. Inclade every person Ilving on maneary tet 1, re Omit
toms.) jration. chiidren born slare January

papers yer. ver =e
Trade, profession, or partic- | Industry, Desin or estab-
ular kind of work done, as lishment im which at work, ware sched:
spinner, salesman, labor- 43 coften mill, dry goods |"°'*er.ort ule.
store, farm, etc. working

PERSON, FATHER. MOTHER.

English.

Mortgased.
poarocentarels
tlon.
Attended school
any time since
hept. 1, 1919.

write,

‘ |
Place of birth. | Mother tongue. Place of birth. Mother tongur. Place of birth. | Mother toncue,

read,
Whether able ton

Street, avesar,

road, ete.

Ilome owned or

reated

If owned, free or

Color or race.

Single, married,
widowed, ordl-| *

Year of immicra-
tlon tothe Ualt-
ed States.

Naturallzed or
allen,

If natorallged,

Whether able to

Whether able to

= | Age at last birth-
day

c | Sex.

zs

FW. lye ML Win Um |. 0 it) DAMS. Ds A. DEY | Ase
yy 44 pe 883 Na J Hs _' Aid ELE eet fs Exeticd t | | Exe tlisecl’ Lu

, 2. KES Zughile 1 vob Sug lad

S93 174.2-192_ FH2 @ Artad
ee /

Salata us yao) 4g acghied eee pen el

il feed hake Eeaas AA wove a.
Ree Z 1S, 7 2 ee a
sa lant. seiner chad lew er ea nteacd.. Yiaid. A...

Le SUS sian ia

Ct ; 7 n> é s

a

| ‘== 1 Ar = ae
| | .

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http:/www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

ale Ivy ley

Med dy taskelea! Ugary, Gaael WA
W\ bigectooly | trafizr a

4

PEERDEPSTE
#### Felix MONTALDO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-452.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 24, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 20, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 20, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0020. LEONARD A. SILVERSTEIN v. ELLEN S. FRAUENTHAL et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2019CV318750