Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules 36837 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

this action does not involve technical 

standards; and 

• does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where the EPA or an Indian 

tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), nor will it impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 23, 2018. 

Chris Hladick, 

Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16371 Filed 7–30–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 68 

[EPA–HQ–OEM–2015–0725; FRL–9981–66– 

OLEM] 

RIN 2050–AG95 

Accidental Release Prevention 

Requirements: Risk Management 

Programs Under the Clean Air Act 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; notification of 

data availability and extension of 

comment period; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) issued a proposed rule in 

the Federal Register on May 30, 2018 to 

request public comment on several 

proposed changes to the final Risk 

Management Program Amendments rule 

(Amendments rule) issued on January 

13, 2017. This document is being issued 

to correct technical errors in the 

Regulatory Impact Analysis and the 

Notification of Data Availability and 

Extension of Comment Period for the 

proposed rule. 

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule 

(83 FR 24850, May 30, 2018), as 

extended by the Notification of Data 

Availability and Extension of Comment 

Period (83 FR 34967, July 24, 2018) 

must be received by August 23, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments and 

additional materials, identified by 

docket EPA–HQ–OEM–2015–0725 to 

the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James Belke, United States 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Office of Land and Emergency 

Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW (Mail Code 5104A), Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 

564–8023; email address: belke.jim@

epa.gov, or Kathy Franklin, United 

States Environmental Protection 

Agency, Office of Land and Emergency 

Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW (Mail Code 5104A), Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 

564–7987; email address: 

franklin.kathy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Detailed 

background information describing the 

proposed RMP Reconsideration 

rulemaking may be found in a 

previously published document: 

Accidental Release Prevention 

Requirements: Risk Management 

Programs Under the Clean Air Act; 

Proposed Rule (83 FR 24850, May 30, 

2018). 

I. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is correcting incorrect date 

references to the version of the Risk 

Management Plan (RMP) database used 

to extract accident history information 

for the years 2014 through 2016. EPA 

used this accident information to update 

the trend of accidents from RMP 

facilities discussed in the Regulatory 

Impact Analysis for the proposed 

Reconsideration rule (EPA. Regulatory 

Impact Analysis, Reconsideration of the 

2017 Amendments to the Accidental 

Release Prevention Requirements: Risk 

Management Programs Under the Clean 

Air Act, Section 112(r)(7), April 27, 

2018). EPA also referred to the 2014– 

2016 accident information in the 

Accidental Release Prevention 

Requirements: Risk Management 

Programs Under the Clean Air Act; 

Notification of Data Availability and 

Extension of Comment Period (83 FR 

34967, July 24, 2018). In both 

documents, EPA made incorrect 

references to the date of the RMP 

database version used to extract these 

accident data. This document serves to 

correct the incorrect date references. 

II. What does this correction do? 

This document corrects incorrect date 

references to the RMP database in two 

locations in the regulatory record for the 

Accidental Release Prevention 

Requirements: Risk Management 

Programs Under the Clean Air Act; 

Proposed Rule (83 FR 24850, May 30, 

2018). One location is on page 33 of the 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
36838 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). Page 

33 of the RIA discusses the availability 

of annual accident data for 2014–2016, 

and includes a footnote (footnote 32) 

indicating the source of the accident 

data. The footnote states: ‘‘EPA. April 

2018. Risk Management Plan (RMP) 

Facility Accident Data, 2014–2016. 

USEPA, Office of Emergency 

Management.’’ This footnote should 

read ‘‘EPA. March 2018. Risk 

Management Plan (RMP) Facility 

Accident Data, 2014–2016. USEPA, 

Office of Emergency Management.’’ 

The other location is on page 34968 

of ‘‘Accidental Release Prevention 

Requirements: Risk Management 

Programs Under the Clean Air Act; 

Notification of Data Availability and 

Extension of Comment Period,’’ 83 FR 

34967, 34968 (July 24, 2018), in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. 

Column two of this page also discusses 

the 2014–2016 accident data, but 

incorrectly indicates that EPA 

developed the docketed spreadsheet 

containing these data from the 

November 2017 version of the RMP 

database. The last sentence of the 

carryover paragraph at the top of 

column two should read: ‘‘EPA 

developed the latter spreadsheet from 

the March 2018 version of the 

database.’’ 

While the facility count information 

discussed in the Notification of Data 

Availability was based on the November 

2017 version of the RMP database, EPA 

extracted the 2014–2016 accident data 

from the March 2018 version of the RMP 

database, as indicated above. EPA notes 

that the previously docketed 2014–2016 

accident spreadsheet contains an 

additional 25 accident records for the 

2014–2016 period that were not 

available when the November 2017 

version of the database was created. By 

using a later version of the database to 

extract accident records, EPA provided 

more up-to-date accident information to 

support the regulatory record. However, 

users who attempt to replicate EPA’s 

2014–2016 accident spreadsheet by 

extracting accident data from the 

November 2017 version of the RMP 

database (which was recently added to 

the rulemaking docket as EPA–HQ– 

OEM–2015–0725–0989) would not see 

the additional 25 accident records. 

EPA has added a memo to the 

rulemaking docket dated July 25, 2018, 

with the subject line: Corrections to 

References to Risk Management Plan 

Accident Information for 2014–2016. 

This memo explains the corrections 

discussed above and includes a list of 

the 25 accidents that are included in the 

2014–2016 spreadsheet but not in the 

November 2017 version of the RMP 

database. 

Dated: July 25, 2018. 

Reggie Cheatham, 

Director, Office of Emergency Management. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16372 Filed 7–30–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002; FRL–9981– 

39—Region 6] 

National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan; National Priorities List: Partial 

Deletion of the South Valley Superfund 

Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Region 6 is issuing a 

Notice of Intent to Delete Operable 

Units 1, 2, and 5 of the South Valley 

Superfund Site (Site) located in 

Albuquerque, New Mexico, from the 

National Priorities List (NPL) and 

requests public comments on this 

proposed action. The NPL, promulgated 

pursuant to section 105 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is 

an appendix of the National Oil and 

Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and 

the State of New Mexico, through the 

New Mexico Environment Department, 

have determined that all appropriate 

response actions at these identified 

parcels under CERCLA have been 

completed, other than five-year reviews 

and operation and maintenance 

activities. However, this deletion does 

not preclude future actions under 

Superfund. This partial deletion 

pertains to Operable Units 1, 2, and 5. 

The remaining Operable Units 3, 4, and 

6 will remain on the NPL and are not 

being considered for deletion as part of 

this action. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

August 30, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ– 

SFUND–1983–0002, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov . Follow 

the online instructions for submitting 

comments. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish 

any comment received to its public 

docket. Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

• Email: hebert.michael@epa.gov. 

• Mail: Michael A. Hebert, Remedial 

Project Manager, EPA Region 6, Mail 

Code—6SF–RL, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

• Hand delivery: 

Æ Michael A. Hebert, Remedial Project 

Manager, EPA Region 6, Mail Code— 

6SF–RL, 7th Floor Reception Area, 

1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 

75202–2733. 

Æ Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Docket’s normal hours of 

operation (Monday through Friday, 7 

a.m. to 4 p.m.) and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983– 

0002. The http://www.regulations.gov 

website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system, which means EPA will not 

know your identity or contact 

information unless you provide it in the 

body of your comment. If you send an 

email comment directly to EPA without 

going through http://

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS