alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1784 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

31) II-C-2 

Docket Number: 

A-84-44 

Printed 10/31/2008 8:05:39 AM Sheet 31 of 143 
c UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

1 4 HQV |9 8 5 

Mr. Christie Johnson 

Pennwalt Corporation 

3 Parkway 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 

Dear Mr. Johnson: 

This is to confirm our telephone conversation on November 6, 1985, 

concerning methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), a tertiary amine produced by 

Pennwalt Corporation. 

The Environmental Protection Agency 1s in the process of reviewing 

the new source performance standard for petroleum refineries, specifically 

refinery fuel gas. Our research via literature and contacts with petroleum 

refineries indicates that alkanolamine treating is the most prominent 

method of removing hydrogen sulfide from refinery fuel gas. We have also., 

learned that three different types of amines are used: primary, secondary, 

and tertiary. Fortunately, there is a large amount of published information on both primary and secondary amines; unfortunately, there is ^ecy 

little published information on tertiary amines. Therefore, 1 would like 

to request that you send me any information you may have on MDEA. I would 

appreciate information on the following specific characteristics of MDEA: 

Molecular weight 

Basicity (reactivity) 

Capacity (scf/gal) 

Corrosivity: design limitations (% solution and m/m) 

metallurgical requirements 

Stripping character: CO2 (Btu/lb) 

H2S (Btu/lb) 

Hydrocarbon solubility (relative): amine in liquid hydrocarbon 

gaseous hydrocarbon in amine 

Solvent losses (lb of amine/MM scf of gas) 

Reclaiming (temperature and type of reclaimer) 

Reboiler Temperature at IZ psig 

Thermal properties: Heat capacity at 180°F (Btu/lb°F) 

L/R exchanger heat transfer coefficient (Btu/hr) 

Thermal stability 

Freezing point (at typical solution concentrations) 

Cost (cents/lb) 

Availability (number of major suppliers in U.S.) 

Application: pressure, specification, and limit on capacity 

Mercaptan removal 

Chemical degradation: H^S 

£2^ 

_____ COS CONCURRENCES 

SYMBOL 

SURNAME 

DATE 

& 

tpr***-' 

^\ w tf 

EPA Form 1320-1 (;12-70) OFFICIAL FILE COPY 

GPO : 1983 0 - 40J-201 
P.3 

I would appreciate receiving this information as soon as possible so that 

it can be included in the review process for our forthcoming document. 

Your assistance in providing this information will be greatly 

appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 

me at (919) 541-5595. 

Sincerely, 

William Larry Elmore, P.E. 

Industrial Studies Branch 

Emission Standards and 

Engineering Division 

ESED/ISB/SDSyWLElmore/xhbaker 11/6/85 x5596 Rm.755 MU (MD-13) 

File No. H/P-^'/'/S'S Project No. -33/03 retyped 11/7/85 chb
#### Philip SIMON, Appellant, v. CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSONVILLE, a national banking institution chartered under the laws of the United States, Appellee.

No. N-443.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 9, 1971.

Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, for appellant.

James M. McLean, of Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff seeks appellate review of a final judgment judicially declaring his status, rights, duties, and liability under a collateral promissory note given by him to defendant and awarding defendant a money judgment on its counterclaim for the balance due on the note after credit for the collateral sold by defendant upon default.

It is appellant’s sole contention that ap-pellee failed to comply strictly with the requirements of that section of our statutes which provides for the sale of collateral securities,1 as a result of which the sale of the collateral was void and did not pass to the purchaser a valid title thereto. From the evidence we find that the controlling statutory requirements were sub*635stantially complied with and appellant has failed to demonstrate that his rights were prejudiced as a result of any material deviation therefrom. We therefore conclude, as did the trial court, that appellant’s contention is without merit. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

1

. F.S. §, 685.02, F.S.A., now replaced by Uniform Commercial Code, F.S. § 679.9-504, F.S.A.
01/11/2010 10:43 8163294106 SAD PAGE 02/02 

CUBCRAFTERS TO 

Novemb« 13.2009 JVv ^ | ) Q . 

Ms. Kim Smith 

Manager 

Small Airplane Directorate 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust Street 

Kansas City Missouri G4106 

Re: Request for Exemption (FAA -2009-1161) 

Dear Ms Smith: 

Thank you for your letter dated December 16, 2009. Below is a summary that may be published 

in the Federal Register in accordance with 14 CFR, part 11, § 11.81(f): 

Cubcraflers, Inc. petitions the FAA for an exemption for the CC18-181 from Section 23.562, 

Amendment 23-50 of Trtte 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. In lieu of this regulation, 

Cubcrafters will perform static tests on the seat and harnesses and equip the CC18-181 with a 

4~point harness with a TSO. Justification for this exemption is also based on the low stall speed 

of the aircraft and the fact that head impact is unlikely. 

Please note that the correct address of Cubcrafters is: 

1918 South 16'" Avenue 

Yakima. WA 98903. 

(The P.O. Box is no longer being used.) 

Sincerely, 

Eric Leaver 

Program Manager/Administrative DER 

Cubcrafters. Inc. 

Cub Grafters, Inc. -191 8 S 16"* Ave. . Yal|cima WA 98903 

Phone: (509) 248-9491 - Fax: (509) 248-1421 - Irrtemet: www.cubcrafters.com
#### E. C. PUBLICATIONS, INC., d/b/a Mad Magazine, a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF POLICE, a Non-profit Florida Corporation and Gerald Arenberg, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellees.

No. 71-1164.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1544 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1544

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 
provisions of the Heartland, Habitat, Harvest, and Horticulture Act of 
            2008 relating to timber, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2013

Mr. Pryor (for himself and Mr. Boozman) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 
provisions of the Heartland, Habitat, Harvest, and Horticulture Act of 
            2008 relating to timber, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Timber Revitalization and Economic 
Enhancement Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF TIMBER GAINS.

    (a) Special Rate Made Permanent.--Paragraph (1) of section 1201(b) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``ending 
after the date'' and all that follows through ``after such date'' and 
inserting ``beginning after the date of the enactment of the Timber 
Revitalization and Economic Enhancement Act of 2013''.
    (b) Adjustment of Special Rate.--
            (1) In general.--Clause (i) of section 1201(b)(1)(B) of 
        such Code is amended by striking ``15 percent'' and inserting 
        ``20 percent''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 55(b) of such Code is 
        amended by striking paragraph (4).
    (c) Computation for Taxable Years in Which Rate First Applies.--
Paragraph (3) of section 1201(b) of such Code is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(3) Computation for taxable years in which rate first 
        applies.--In the case of any taxable year which includes the 
        date of the enactment of the Timber Revitalization and Economic 
        Enhancement Act of 2013, the qualified timber gain for such 
        year shall not exceed the qualified timber gain properly taken 
        into account for the portion of the year after such date.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# age_reg
#### Almond H. THOMAS and Irene Thomas, his wife, Appellants, v. ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation; Henry Roberts and Maureen Roberts, Appellees.

No. 70-343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 8, 1970.

Taylor, Brion, Buker, Hames, Greene & Whitworth, and Robert J. Paterno, Miami, for appellants.

Fowler, White, Humkey, Burnett, Hurley & Banick, and Fred R. Ober, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY and SWANN, JJ., and NATHAN, RAYMOND G., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Appellants, Plaintiffs in the trial court, from a final judgment as a result of a non jury trial in favor of the appellees.

Previously this cause was remanded to the trial court for trial following review by the Supreme Court of Florida of this Court's judgment, by certiorari, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d, 920; Fla.1969, 226 So.2d 100; Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 831.

The testimony adduced before the trial judge, which is the subject of this appeal, is materially the same as in the prior appeal and, therefore, need not be reviewed here. Upon review of such facts it appears there was ample competent evidence to support the judgment of the trial court.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-6354 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABEL PARAMA BORROMEO, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 95-7621 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABEL PARAMA BORROMEO, Defendant - Appellant.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge. (CR-89-241, CA-94-950, CA-95-755-2) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 2, 19962 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abel Parama Borromeo, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the r easoning of the district court. United States v. Borromeo , Nos. CR-89-241; CA-94-950; CA-95-755-2 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 17, 1995 & Sept. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED3
‘STATE eden. DEPARTHRNT OF COMMEROE-BUREAU, OF THE CENSUS oem [eres Disract No_—A__

come. : FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1920-POPULATION emoenwron isrmct No Z|
‘TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF com ated ltt th Resta let [NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE. serra srr were wae Waro oF cry

ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE 2. DAY OF 1320. _C. Oot Enuweraror 316 0/

NAME OF INSTITUTION yaar STOR MERE TT

Fuck oy ome 7a os 7] peer Sanne io eran TOrOTE 7 rovers
Pn pm ee iE; arstrentnaesreceentaar ener nen renremrmsnan |i

5G) aarmncomgpeggemersemnn | mu 4 HH i pcm Beery

al
I

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www .orchives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

a
t

PEP EYRE

wl
m7

aa

BE SPP]

acd Ea

EE ESE IEEE ele
PRBEBER ER Plaloby

os
vol
‘al
x
aol
|
xl
nl
|
al
|
of
a
|
al
|
of
a
al
ol
109
# United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 19-1794 TOWN OF WEYMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS; ROBERT HEDLUND, Mayor of Town of Weymouth; PATRICK M. O'CONNOR, State Senator; MICHAEL SMART, Vice President District Six; KENNETH J. DIFAZIO, District Three Councilor; JANE HACKETT, Councilor at Large; ED HARRINGTON, District Five Councilor; REBECCA HAUGH, District One Councilor; ARTHUR MATHEWS, District Four Councilor; MICHAEL MOLISSE, Councilor at Large; SCOTT DOWD, Conservation Commissioner;

GEORGE LORING, Conservation Commissioner; THOMAS TANNER, Conservation Commissioner; FRANK SINGLETON, Conservation Commissioner; JOHN REILLY, Conservation Commissioner; CITY OF BRAINTREE, MASSACHUSETTS; TOWN OF HINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS; CITY OF QUINCY, MASSACHUSETTS,

Petitioners,

v.

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,

Respondent,

ALGONQUIN GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC,

Intervenor.

No. 19-1797

ELIZABETH MOULDS; JENNIFER MATHIAN; OLIVIA LANNA; PRIYA HOWELL;
KATHERINE ROGERS; MICHAEL MULLALEY; HEATHER KAAS; KATIE MCBRINE; JANICE DEYOUNG; A. SILVIA FABRIZIO; KATHLEEN CRONIN,

Petitioners,

v.

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,

Respondent,ALGONQUIN GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC,

Intervenor.

No. 19-1803

DOROTHY ANDERSON; ALICE ARENA; MARGARET BELLAFIORE; WENDY
CULLIVAN; SUSAN GREENE; REBECCA HAUGH; ANDREA HONORE; MICHAEL LANG; CURTIS NORDGAARD, M.D.; THOMAS PENDERGAST; JUDY ROBERTS; FRANK SINGLETON; BETSY SOWERS; BERNADETTE WILSON,

Petitioners,

v.

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,

Respondent,

ALGONQUIN GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC,

Intervenor.

Before

Thompson, Lipez, and Kayatta, Circuit Judges.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on June 3, 2020, is
amended as follows:

On page 17, line 17, "dispatch" is replaced with "dispense"
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  Second Quarter 2000 and 1999




                                    Second     Second     Standard    Standard
Area                                quarter    quarter    error on    error on
                                     2000       1999     2000 rate  difference

United States.....................      67.2       66.6        0.2         0.3

  Inside MAs......................      65.2       64.6        0.2         0.3
   In central cities..............      50.7       50.1        0.3         0.5
   Not in central cities (suburbs)      74.0       73.7        0.2         0.3
  Outside MAs.....................      75.3       74.8        0.4         0.5

 Northeast........................      63.4       62.8        0.4         0.6
 Midwest..........................      72.2       71.2        0.4         0.5
 South............................      69.2       68.9        0.3         0.4
 West.............................      61.9       61.3        0.4         0.5
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birner Dental Management
Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

                                            Date:    August 12, 2004.

                                              By:    /s/ Frederic W.J. Birner
                                                     -------------------------
                                            Name:    Frederic W.J. Birner
                                           Title:    Chief Executive Officer

                                              By:    /s/ Dennis N. Genty
                                                     -------------------------
                                            Name:    Dennis N. Genty
                                           Title:    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1420 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1420

 To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for transparency of 
                 payments made from the Judgment Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2013

  Mrs. Fischer (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Crapo, and Mr. Risch) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for transparency of 
                 payments made from the Judgment Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Judgment Fund Transparency Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. JUDGMENT FUND TRANSPARENCY.

    (a) Transparency Requirement.--Section 1304 of title 31, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Unless the disclosure of such information is otherwise 
prohibited by law or court order, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
make available to the public on a website, as soon as practicable, but 
not later than 30 days after the date on which a payment under this 
section is tendered, the following information with regard to that 
payment:
            ``(1) The name of the specific agency or entity whose 
        actions gave rise to the claim or judgment.
            ``(2) The name of the plaintiff or claimant.
            ``(3) The name of counsel for the plaintiff or claimant.
            ``(4) The amount paid representing principal liability, and 
        any amounts paid representing any ancillary liability, 
        including attorney fees, costs, and interest.
            ``(5) A brief description of the facts that gave rise to 
        the claim.
            ``(6) The name of the agency that submitted the claim.''.
    (b) Implementation.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall implement 
the amendment made by this section beginning not later than 60 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Coates International, Ltd. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”),
I, Barry C. Kaye, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







August
      13, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Barry
      C. KayeBarry
      C. KayeTreasurer,
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 445TH DISTRICT COURT of CAMERON COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 20th day of

October, 2016, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Alberto Alba Villarreal, Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-15-00037-CR (Tr.Ct.No. 2013-DCR-3189-I)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part (Count II)

and reversed and rendered in part (Count I). The Court orders the judgment of the trial

court AFFIRMED IN PART (COUNT II) and REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART

(COUNT I).

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 10th day of January, 2018.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK