alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Melia Marcel DAMBAKLY, Appellant, v. James Rooney MASON, Appellee.

No. 66-252.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 24, 1967.

Ligman & Shepherd, Miami, for appellant.

Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Stephens and Edward A. Perse, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

*36HENDRY, Chief Judge.

The trial court entered judgment for the defendant, James Rooney Mason, after granting his motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case in an automobile negligence action.

Plaintiff, Melia Marcel Dambakly, testified that on November 22, 1964 at about 6 30 P.M., she was returning to Miami from Marco Island on the Tamiami Trail, which is U. S. Highway 41. She was traveling at a speed of fifty to fifty-five miles per hour and was approximately four to five car lengths behind another car which was also heading east. Though it was not completely dark, plaintiff, the car in front of her and west bound vehicles had their headlights on. Plaintiff first saw the defendant’s vehicle when it was turning from her left and already partially in her lane approximately twenty to thirty feet in front of her. In an attempt to avoid hitting defendant’s vehicle, plaintiff swerved off the highway, lost control of her car and eventually came to rest in a canal. The defendant came to plaintiff’s aid while she was in the canal.

The defendant, testifying as an adverse witness, stated that he entered Tamiami Trail from a dirt road known as Turner River Grade. At that time, he either saw or it was called to his attention that defendant’s automobile had gone into the canal.

Plaintiff submits that the trial court invaded the province of the jury in directing a verdict.

A prima facie case of negligence on the part of defendant was established by the evidence presented by plaintiff. It is reasonable to find from the evidence that the defendant turned onto a highway in disregard of the near presence of plaintiff’s oncoming car which he should have seen and which had the right of way.

The defendant argues that plaintiffs contributory negligence was established as a matter of law by her own testimony that she did not see defendant’s vehicle until it was in her lane twenty or thirty feet in front of her.

Whether plaintiff should have seen defendant’s vehicle turning into her lane in time to take some other action is a question to he submitted to the jury. Liefer v. Walton, Fla.App.1962, 140 So.2d 350.

The evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom do not point to but one reasonable conclusion, thus, it was error for the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant. Brookbank v. Mathieu, Fla.App.1963, 152 So.2d 526.

Therefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
#### James Vivien CRUM, II v STATE.

No. 38545.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 219 So.2d 461.
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002George W. Hamlin, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer and Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, of Canandaigua National Corporation (the Company), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Company.The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.February 13, 2008/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV/s/ Lawrence A. HeilbronnerGeorge W. Hamlin, IVLawrence A. HeilbronnerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32(1)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger S. Marcus,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


March 30, 2004

/s/ Roger S. Marcus
------------------------
Roger S. Marcus
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30, 1997
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IAC, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000947431
<NAME>                        IAC, INC.
<CURRENCY>                    US$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   6,205
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     7,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             54,244
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        2,500
<COMMON>                                           4,273
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       7,994
<SALES>                                           29,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  29,074
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  45,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (16,160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (16,160)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.00)
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Nick DEBENEDETTO.

No. 61391.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 19, 1978.

In re: Nick Debenedetto applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. E. Baton Rouge Parish.

Writ granted. Relator is ordered released.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge,
that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007 of
the Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Michael E. DeDomenicoMichael
      E. DeDomenicoChief
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      11, 2008
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.   /s/Leon J. Olivier(Signature)Leon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer  /s/David R. McHale(Signature)David R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date:  February 28, 2008  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Winifred Huey KIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. N-441 and N-442.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 12, 1971.

H. Clay Mitchell, Jr., Pensacola, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Kimmons v. State, 178 So.2d 608 (Fla.App.1965).

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K. and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
year ended 12/31/97 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,259                  28,259
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,028                 151,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (6,955)                 (6,955)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,979,063               1,979,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,556,601               6,556,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          271,075                 271,075
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,556,601               6,556,601
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               417,973               1,610,364
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,839                 491,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,361                 404,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,666                 202,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (133,698)               (189,988)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (55,823)                (53,496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (77,875)               (136,492)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.29)                  (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.29)                  (0.50)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1571 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1571

 To permit the District of Columbia to obligate and expend local funds 
   in accordance with the local budget adopted by the Council of the 
District of Columbia during any period of fiscal year 2014 in which no 
Federal law appropriating such local funds is in effect, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 12, 2013

  Ms. Landrieu (for herself, Mr. Carper, and Mr. Udall of New Mexico) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit the District of Columbia to obligate and expend local funds 
   in accordance with the local budget adopted by the Council of the 
District of Columbia during any period of fiscal year 2014 in which no 
Federal law appropriating such local funds is in effect, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING USE OF LOCAL FUNDS BY DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WHEN 
              NO FEDERAL APPROPRIATION OF LOCAL FUNDS IS IN EFFECT FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2014.

    (a) Use of Local Funds.--Notwithstanding any provision of the 
District of Columbia Home Rule Act, during any period of fiscal year 
2014 in which no Act of Congress is in effect to approve the obligation 
or expenditure of local funds by the District of Columbia government, 
the District of Columbia may obligate and expend local funds for 
programs and activities at the rate set forth under ``District of 
Columbia Funds--Summary of Expenses'' as included in the Fiscal Year 
2014 Budget Request Act of 2013 (D.C. Act 20-127), as modified as of 
the date of the enactment of this Act, except that the obligation or 
expenditure of such local funds for a program or activity shall remain 
subject to any terms and conditions which were imposed on the 
obligation or expenditure of local funds for such program or activity 
pursuant to section 1101 of the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113-6; 127 Stat. 412).
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any 
obligation or expenditure of funds occurring on or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed ChargesExhibit 12(In thousands)Years Ended December 31,Earnings, as defined:20062005200420032002Net income/(loss) from continuing operations beforecumulative effect of accounting change$126,150$(266,576)$69,776$77,266$148,529Income tax (benefit)/expense(81,429)(187,796)21,76519,87972,682Equity in earnings of regional nucleargenerating and transmission companies(334)(3,311)(2,592)(4,487)(11,215)Dividends received from regional equity investees2,1456873,8798,90411,056Fixed charges, as below258,524260,907236,500228,908290,590Interest capitalized (not including AFUDC)----(2,085)Preferred dividend security requirements ofconsolidated subsidiaries(9,265)(9,265)(9,265)(9,265)(9,265)Total earnings/(loss), as defined$295,791$(205,354)$320,063$321,205$500,292Fixed charges, as defined:Interest on long-term debt$141,579$131,870$107,365$88,700$134,471Interest on rate reduction bonds74,24287,43998,899108,359115,791Other interest22,21719,7558,76210,39816,998Rental interest factor5,3006,7337,0677,3665,433Amortized premiums, discounts andcapitalized expenses related to indebtedness5,9215,8455,1424,8206,547Preferred dividend security requirements ofconsolidated subsidiaries9,2659,2659,2659,2659,265Interest capitalized (not including AFUDC)----2,085Total fixed charges, as defined$258,524$260,907$236,500$228,908$290,590Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges1.14(0.79)(a)1.351.401.72(a) Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $466.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     11,701,020               11,701,020   
<SECURITIES>                                        0                        0   
<RECEIVABLES>                               7,596,365                7,596,365   
<ALLOWANCES>                                  285,000                  285,000   
<INVENTORY>                                   648,654                  648,654   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           23,203,401               23,203,401   
<PP&E>                                     46,122,116               46,122,116   
<DEPRECIATION>                             21,170,569               21,170,569   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            130,437,545              130,437,545   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      23,764,252               23,764,252   
<BONDS>                                    81,784,650               81,784,650   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                        0   
<PREFERRED>                                         0                        0   
<COMMON>                                        1,700                    1,700   
<OTHER-SE>                                 21,119,545               21,119,545   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              130,437,545              130,437,545   
<SALES>                                    13,592,803               25,867,135   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           13,592,803               25,867,135   
<CGS>                                               0                        0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              12,125,077               24,035,933   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              130,889              (4,469,439)   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                        0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,867,451                6,020,415   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1,530,614)                  280,226   
<INCOME-TAX>                                   50,000                   50,000   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1,580,614)                  230,226   
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                        0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                        0   
<CHANGES>                                           0                        0   
<NET-INCOME>                              (1,580,614)                  230,226   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (9.30)                     1.35   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (9.30)                     1.35   
        

</TABLE>
#### John J. LEGENDRE and Catherine Lasseigne Legendre v. Wally RODRIGUE and the Travelers Insurance Company.

No. 61770.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: John J. Legendre and Catherine Lesseigne Legendre, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche. 358 So.2d 665.

Writ denied.
Table 7.  Homeownership Rates by Age of Householder:  First Quarter 2000 and 1999


                              First      First    Standard   Standard
Age of householder           Quarter    Quarter   error on   error on
                                 2000       1999  2000 rate difference

United States..............      67.1       66.7        0.2        0.2

    Less than 25 years.....      20.8       18.4        0.6        0.9
    25 to 29 years.........      37.5       36.6        0.6        0.9
    30 to 34 years.........      54.8       53.5        0.6        0.8
    35 to 39 years.........      63.8       64.1        0.5        0.7
    40 to 44 years.........      70.7       69.7        0.5        0.7
    45 to 49 years.........      74.1       74.4        0.5        0.7
    50 to 54 years.........      78.2       78.3        0.5        0.7
    55 to 59 years.........      81.0       80.9        0.6        0.8
    60 to 64 years.........      80.6       81.4        0.6        0.8
    65 to 69 years.........      83.3       83.2        0.6        0.8
    70 to 74 years.........      83.4       82.1        0.6        0.9
    75 years and over......      76.7       76.6        0.5        0.7

      Less than 35 years...      40.5       39.4        0.4        0.5
      35 to 44 years.......      67.3       67.0        0.4        0.5
      45 to 54 years.......      76.0       76.2        0.4        0.5
      55 to 64 years.......      80.8       81.1        0.4        0.6
      65 years and over....      80.1       79.8        0.3        0.5