alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99(1)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger S. Marcus,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


April 15, 2003

/s/ Roger S. Marcus
-------------------------
Roger S. Marcus
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 00-7014.

#### Ramon Vega *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1350 

To exclude from gross income compensation provided for victims of the 

March 29, 2013, pipeline oil spill in Mayflower, Arkansas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2013 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself and Mr. PRYOR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To exclude from gross income compensation provided for 

victims of the March 29, 2013, pipeline oil spill in 

Mayflower, Arkansas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mayflower Oil Spill 

5 Tax Relief Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAYFLOWER, ARKANSAS, OIL SPILL COMPENSA7 TION EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME. 

8 For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 

9 1986— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1350 IS

1 (1) the March 29, 2013, pipeline rupture and 

2 oil spill in Mayflower, Arkansas, shall be treated as 

3 a qualified disaster under section 139(c) of such 

4 Code, and 

5 (2) any compensation provided to or for the 

6 benefit of a victim of such disaster shall be treated 

7 as a qualified disaster relief payment under section 

8 139(b) of such Code. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6518

In Re: MICHAEL MCEVILY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-297-7)

Submitted: June 23, 2003 Decided: July 11, 2003

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael McEvily, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael McEvily petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the

district court has unduly delayed acting on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. He seeks an order from this court directing the

district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is

not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the

mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another

mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously.

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
#### TOWN OF MANGONIA PARK, Appellant, v. Raymond C. JONES, Appellee.

No. 1316.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 19, 1968.

George L. Pink, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Raymond C. Jones, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the entry of a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling the defendant, Town of Mangonia Park, to cancel five (5) licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages. Four of the licenses are for the sale of beer and wine only and fall within the classification under F.S. Section 561.34(2), F.S.A.1965. The other license comes within F.S. Sections 561.34 (3)-(8), F.S.A.1965, and permits the sale *144of beverages of any alcoholic content. This latter license clearly falls within the population restrictions of Section 561.20(1) limiting the number of licenses that may be issued within a municipality. Inasmuch as the defendant town has less than 1,251 residents the issuance of such a license to George’s Smokehouse was clearly improper, a fact that defendant now concedes. State ex rel. Village of North Palm Beach v. Cochran, Fla.1959, 112 So.2d 1.

The other four licenses, being for beer and wine only, are not among those limited by population. Their issuance was therefore not improper. To the extent the peremptory writ seeks to compel cancellation of beer and wine licenses it is reversed. As to all other aspects the entry of the writ is affirmed.

Affirmed, in part; reversed in part.

WALDEN, C. J., McCAIN, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Fornaro, President and Chief Executive Officer and Stanley J Gadek, Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |     |  |                                                                      
|---------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|November 5, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ ROBERT L. FORNARO                                                
|                 |  |     |  | Robert L. Fornaro                                                    
|                 |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                                
|                 |  |    
|                 |  | By: |  | /s/ STANLEY J. GADEK                                                 
|                 |  |     |  | Stanley J. Gadek                                                     
|                 |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Leo BRAMSON and Marvin J. Welfeld, Appellants, v. Eugene A. McCABE, Bernard Bagan, Seymour Bagan, George D. Sax, Harold H. Harrison, Raymond L. Lutgert, Sherwin Shapiro, Robert H. Winer, Maurice A. Rosenthal, Alvin W. Cohn, Sheldon Kaplan, Elson B. Cahn, and Samuel Delevitt, individually and as co-partners of a Florida limited partnership doing business as Chiglades Farms, Ltd., Appellees.

Nos. 70-152, 70-381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 28, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1971.

John R. Beranek, Jones, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

J. Reid Heuer, Heuer & Albury, West Palm Beach, for appellee McCabe.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the record on appeal, and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, it is the conclusion of this court that the appellants have failed to make error appear. Accordingly, the orders from which the present appeals have been taken are affirmed,

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
#### Harvey A. FLEISHER, M.D. and Robert E. Willner, M.D., Appellants, v. POINT EAST ONE CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-969.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States: 1965 to 2001



           First   Second    Third   Fourth
   Year   Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter

2001.....    67.5     67.7     68.1
2000.....    67.1     67.2     67.7     67.5

1999.....    66.7     66.6     67.0     66.9
1998.....    65.9     66.0     66.8     66.4
1997.....    65.4     65.7     66.0     65.7
1996.....    65.1     65.4     65.6     65.4
1995.....    64.2     64.7     65.0     65.1
1994.....    63.8     63.8     64.1     64.2
1993\r...    63.7     63.9     64.2     64.2
1993.....    64.2     64.4     64.7     64.6
1992.....    64.0     63.9     64.3     64.4
1991.....    63.9     63.9     64.2     64.2
1990.....    64.0     63.7     64.0     64.1
1989\r...    63.9     63.8     64.1     63.8

1989.....    63.9     63.9     64.0     63.8
1988.....    63.7     63.7     64.0     63.8
1987.....    63.8     63.8     64.2     64.1
1986.....    63.6     63.8     63.8     63.9
1985.....    64.1     64.1     63.9     63.5
1984.....    64.6     64.6     64.6     64.1
1983.....    64.7     64.7     64.8     64.4
1982.....    64.8     64.9     64.9     64.5
1981.....    65.6     65.3     65.6     65.2
1980.....    65.5     65.5     65.8     65.5
1979\r...    64.8     64.9     65.8     65.4

1979.....    65.3     65.1     66.0     65.8
1978.....    64.8     64.4     65.2     65.4
1977.....    64.8     64.5     65.0     64.9
1976.....    64.6     64.6     64.9     64.8
1975.....    64.4     64.9     64.6     64.5
1974.....    64.8     64.8     64.6     64.4
1973.....    64.9     64.4     64.4     64.4
1972.....    64.3     64.5     64.3     64.4
1971.....    64.0     64.1     64.4     64.5
1970.....    64.3     64.0     64.4     64.0
1969.....    64.1     64.4     64.4     64.4
1968.....    63.6     64.1     64.1     63.6
1967.....    63.3     63.9     63.8     63.5
1966.....    63.5     63.2     63.3     63.8
1965.....    62.9     62.9     62.9     63.4

\r Revised.
<PAGE> 50




Exhibit 21 - List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant

   The following is a list of subsidiaries  meeting the  requirements of Exhibit
   21.

   a)  The Grant County Bank  (incorporated in West Virginia),  doing business
       as The Grant County Bank.

   b)  Capon Valley Bank  (incorporated  in West Virginia),  doing business as
       the Capon Valley Bank.

   c)  HBI  Life  Insurance  Company,  Inc.  (incorporated  in  the  state  of
       Arizona), doing business as HBI Life.

   d)  Highlands  Bankshares Trust Company  (incorporated in the state of West
       Virginia), doing business as Highlands Bankshares Trust Company

                                                                   Exhibit 21
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Coates International, Ltd. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Form
      10-QSB”), I, George J. Coates, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Form 10-QSB fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.





Date:
                  November 13, 2007
              By:
              /s/
                  George J. CoatesGeorge
                  J. CoatesPresident,
                  Chief Executive Officer
                and
                  Principal Executive Officer
#### GORDON THOMPSON CHEVROLET, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. Starling J. GARMON, Respondent.

No. 41801.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 18, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 256 So.2d 87.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.


         Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of International Wire Group,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  August 14, 2003                        /s/ DAVID M. SINDELAR
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Name: David M. Sindelar
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF JUNE 30,  1998 AND THE  UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 OF
TEL-SAVE  HOLDINGS,  INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         33,148,000
<SECURITIES>                                   566,307,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  61,950,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,215,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               739,384,000
<PP&E>                                         66,308,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,043,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 873,408,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          254,557,000
<BONDS>                                        500,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       659,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     84,517,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   873,408,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,244,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,638,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               126,357,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,037,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (97,561,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   40,388,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (137,949,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (137,949,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.14)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21


                                  Subsidiaries

                                   VPGI Corp.
                                   ----------
                                  June 30, 2004

                                      State           Date
 Name                                  of           Acquired/
 ----                             Incorporation      Created      Status
 (100% ownership,                 -------------      -------      ------
 unless otherwise shown)

 uniView Technologies Products
   Group, Inc.                        Texas          08-10-98    Inactive

 uniView Softgen Corporation (61%)    Texas          10-27-99    Inactive

 uniView Asia Limited        (60%)    Hong Kong      06-26-02    Inactive

 Curtis Mathes Corporation            Delaware       11-12-93    Inactive
# A

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/hvs/annual11/ann11def.html
‘jeg SSSR Ms = 55

York eo PARTMENT OF COMMERCE—B [D1—s78) he che
C,-2-—— | a apa mei sy oe aoc SUPERVISOR'S DISTRICT NO........ os SHEET No. .

FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED. TATES: 1920—POPULATION - ENUMERATION DISTRICT No../A:S........ JB

TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF COUT ara ee ; iastractions J ~~ NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE ellea Oy atten p ties UG £9 eRe et Sat ee WARD OF CITY ..../Zror Mak 9... $F / °

NAME. OF INSTITUTION 0. ---cg:2-c00-ccoc2ee-02 (SM x nlite ote Snes we oes coger ee ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE : Whee. Bilicize. ENUMERATOR.

{insert name of institution, ifany, and indicate the lines on which the entries are made. See instrucilons. }
OCCUPATION.

PLACE OF ABODE. NAME RELATION. | TEMURE | PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. | CITIZENSHIP. | EDUCATION. NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE.

= Fe of each person whose place of abode on

House t| Nom- January 1, 1920, was In this family.

¢ | Bumber
| beraf -
or farm Relationship of this
2 te! family} Enter sureame Orst, then the given name and middle nt the head of

inorde laltisl, if asy. e faaily.

f vi
m itation Include every person living om January 1, 1920. Omit
chiidrea bors slace Jaumary 1, 19%0.

STATE......A)-Catat!

peak

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If bora in the United States, give the state or territory, If of foreign birth, cive the place of birth
and, im addition, the mother tomgue. (Nee instructions.)

to

most] ©

Eagiich.

Trade, ees or partic. | Indestry, beainces, or eatab-
alar of work dome, as lishment in which at work, worker.or
apinner, saleeman, labor- aa colton mill, dry goods working ;
er, etc. otere, farm, cic. on Own 4 y

account.

—

earof oataral-

Fratton.

FATHER. WOTHECL.

mortgaged.

Street, avenue,
road, etc

If owned, free or

Color or race,

Single, married,
widowed, or dl-
vorced.

Year of immizra-
tion tothe Unait-
od States.

Naturallsed or
allen.

If naturalized,

Attended achool
apy time sinee
Sept. I, 1919.

Whether able

Whether able

i
Whether able ton

= | Age at last birth-
day

| Home owned or
rented.

ar
Piace of birth. 2 Place of birth. | Mother tongue.

Cy
=!
J
=
-
ame
-
i—)

a
iS

.

RRRKR
a

*

ra] Tas ea ea er Te Sa aa
Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,

not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http:/www.archives.gov for more information about publicly

available records like the one shown here.

(ett all Dea: bid Lie | dre td. er ea BV, ANT cA
c ‘ i $0 7 v/, 4
ae 4 ao -

os - =." 0 Sah

| ~ | v ~,
Lica Larat- femuch.. athe.
‘4,
7.

Y ha

SN

Ee (SSS ae Bae
0, P\ ES
SS ~
|e
bh \
Hy ‘ eS
é H e . ‘
f , ?
Q { ' ; 4 | .
( H ‘ ry
t ' ‘ Lg
~—N SY = ~ = —
‘ . w
\ Q :
NS 1 te v R : i
} N
be S PN 3
h is :
f ai . : ‘
’ ° f ‘ * ‘
: }
\ by,
i .

ERE E|

No

i
;

~~)
iH

Si eo Eras Shoe

X

ik
R
\

a

=

\
\

RR

S5s

|
|

“
=

|

f

t

it

|

ie

E t
\

t t
i

i :
rl —

'

|
t —

c- £
Hi

r

[

'

\

|

STEEN Sy
oy POE fo ae CST i OS ay
A ny ee

|

~~ -

ore repo -

PEE RKE CER EKEEERERE

diced

i
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)

[KPMG LETTERHEAD]

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Syntellect Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-58029, 333-58027, 333-44587, 333-2368, 333-2302, 33-96472, 33-96464,
33-63642, 33-48638, 33-35976, 33-48637, 33-35973, 33-42704, 33-35974 and
333-48870) filed on Form S-8 of Syntellect Inc. of our report dated February 7,
2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Syntellect Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000,
which report appears in Form 10-K of Syntellect Inc.

                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 30, 2001
#### Nathan HOLLOMAN, Petitioner, v. DADE COUNTY and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43012.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 21, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 20, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 20, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0020. LEONARD A. SILVERSTEIN v. ELLEN S. FRAUENTHAL et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2019CV318750