alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clipped By:

sharon_lacey68766

Mon, Apr 15, 2019

Copyright © 2019 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices 

# Order

March 21, 2007

133127

ROY KEVIN RUSS-BEY, #164629

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 133127

CoA: 274385 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the partial filing fee as required by the order of Fe bruary 6, 2007, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this file.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 21, 2007

jm
PROMISSORY NOTE

$ _______________________

SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA

Dated: __________________

Debtor: Landmark International, Inc.

Lender: William J. Kettle

1. NOTE. In consideration for a loan in the principal amount of $____________
the Debtor promises to pay to the order of Lender, the principal amount plus
interest thereon at the rate of ten percent per annum.

2. COLLECTION COSTS. Debtor agrees to pay the actual expenditures made in any
attempt to collect the amount due pursuant to this Note.

3. ATTORNEY'S FEES. Debtor agrees that if any legal action is necessary to
enforce or collect this Note, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
reasonable attorneys' fees in addition to any other relief to which that party
may be entitled. This provision shall be applicable to the entire Note.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Note as of the date
hereinabove.


DEBTOR: Landmark International, Inc.


By: ______________________________________


                                       21
EXHIBIT 21.1


                     List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                     --------------------------------------


American Journal Inc., a New York corporation

King World Media Sales Inc., a Delaware corporation

Four Crowns Inc., a Delaware corporation

Inside Edition Inc., a New York corporation

K.W.M., Inc., a Delaware corporation

King World Corporation, a Delaware corporation

King World Direct Inc., a Delaware corporation

King World FSC Corporation, a Virgin Islands corporation

King World/GSN Inc., a Delaware corporation

King World/LR Inc., a California corporation

King World Merchandising, Inc., a Delaware corporation

King World Studios West Inc., a California corporation

Topper Productions Inc., a California corporation
#### Dudley M. SCIPLE v. Rita D. Sciple CROMBIE.

No. 50678.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 27, 1978.

Goldman & Goldman, Robert M. Dreyfus, Jr., Meridian, for appellant.

Lawrence W. Rabb, Meridian, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Noxubee County; Lenore L. Prather, Chancellor.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
No. 11073.

#### Perry et al. *v.*Miller.

Decided October 12, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Licking county.

*Messrs. Jones & Jones*and *Mr. J. R. Fitzgibbon,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Kibler & Montgomery,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Hudson THOMAS, Administrator of the Succession of Mrs. Emma T. Jackson v. Johnnie A. JONES.

No. 61496.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Johnnie A. Jones, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 353 So.2d 301.

Denied.
#### 27 TRUCK STOP, INC., a Florida corporation, and David B. Higginbottom, Appellants, v. Richard J. DEASE et al., Appellees.

No. 71-66.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 10, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1972.

Robert E. Pyle, Lake Alfred, for appellants.

Michael W. Crews, of Woolfolk, Myers, Curtis, Craig & Gibson, Lake Wales, for appellees.

*270PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein and reversible error not having been shown, the final judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J, and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BRENDA HARRIS,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (ALLIED BARTON SECURITY 

SERVICES, LLC),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 36 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Paul ICKES, Appellant, v. GRASSHOPPER DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-1279.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 17, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Frederick Pfeiffer, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24634 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24635 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24636 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24637 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24638 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24639 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24640 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24641 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24642 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24643 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24644 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24645 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24646 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24647 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24648 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24649 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24650 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24651 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24652 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24653 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24654 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24655 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24656 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24657 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24658 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24659 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24660 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24661 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24662 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24663 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24664 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24665 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24666 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24667 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24668 1987
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 24669 1987
#### WOLFSON v. MOYE.

No. 36493.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 199 So.2d 795.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 13, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: January 25, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen V. Coffey  
|                        |  |  |  | Stephen V. Coffey      
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich
Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Table 9.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  2005 and 2006

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                                 90-Percent
                                          Confidence Interval +/-  2006
Type                         2005  2006     of 2006      of      Percent
                        estimate estimate  Estimate  difference of total

All housing units.......  123,925  126,012       (X)        (X)      100

  Occupied..............  108,231  109,575        252        235      87
    Owner occupied......   74,553   75,380        563        481      60
    Renter occupied.....   33,678   34,195        480        424      27

  Vacant................   15,694   16,437        284        257      13
    Year-round vacant...   11,916   12,459        295        266      10
      For rent..........    3,721    3,737        136        141       3
      For sale only.....    1,451    1,836         72         78       1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy    1,060    1,108         49         62       1
      Held off market...    5,684    5,778        209        191       5
        For occasional u    1,884    1,858        121        111       1
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence     1,128    1,198         97         88       1
        For other reason    2,672    2,722        145        133       2

    Seasonal vacant.....    3,778    3,978        197        182       3


(X) Not applicable.  Since the number of housing units is set equal to an independent national measure,
there is no sampling error, and hence no confidence interval.
\1 A 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence interval
is, in relation to the size of the estiamte, the less reliable the estimate.
* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation. 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-30616

 

JANICE WILLIAMS; LEODREY WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,

versus

WAL-MART STORES, INC.; ET AL,

Defendants,

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(97-CV-1119-A)

--------------------

June 9, 2000

Before WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE*, District

Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                       Williams Holdings of Delaware, Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                              (Dollars in millions)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Three months ended
                                                                            March 31, 1999  
                                                                          ------------------

<S>                                                                       <C>
Earnings:
   Income before income taxes, extraordinary loss, and
      change in accounting principle                                         $     10.6
   Add:
      Interest expense--net                                                        50.2
      Rental expense representative of interest factor                             10.5
      Minority interest in (income) loss of consolidated subsidiaries              (3.0)
      Interest accrued--50% owned company                                           1.8
      Equity losses in less than 50% owned companies                               20.2
      Other                                                                         1.6
                                                                             ----------

         Total earnings as adjusted plus fixed charges                       $     91.9
                                                                             ==========

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense--net                                                     $     50.2
   Capitalized interest                                                             8.7
   Rental expense representative of interest factor                                10.5
   Interest accrued--50% owned company                                              1.8
                                                                             ----------

         Total fixed charges                                                 $     71.2
                                                                             ==========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                 1.29
                                                                             ==========
</TABLE>
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Housing Vacancies and Homeownership    >Data
 Skip to looking for section Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Housing Vacancies and Homeownership (CPS/HVS) - Data
  Data Tables, Products, and Reports
  Detailed Tables
 Historical Tables
 Quarterly Vacancy and Homeownership Rates by State and MSA
 Annual Statistics
 Annual and Quarterly Charts of Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates and Homeownership Rates
  Prior Releases
  Previous Quarters
 Archived Releases
  Publications
  Housing Vacancies and Homeownership Past Publications
 Last Revised: April 17, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7153

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTWAIN O. CARTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:08-cr-00357-REP-1)

Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antwain O. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arlen Jagels, 

Special, Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Wiley Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antwain O. Carter appeals a district court order 

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c) (2006). The court denied the motion because the 

Guidelines amendments did not lower Carter’s Guidelines sentence 

because he was sentenced as a career offender. We conclude that 

the district court did not abuse its discretion. United 

States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating 

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, David G. Zahka, Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), have reviewed the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30 , 2003 and, based on the inquiries I have made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., I hereby certify that:
 
 (i) the Talk America Holdings, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30 , 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America Holdings, Inc.
 
 This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Talk America Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Talk America Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 /s/ David G. Zahka
 David G. Zahka
 Chief Financial Officer
 November 11, 2003
#### Ricardo RAMOS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-78.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 26, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
1 

## Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 10:28 AM

To: 'info@pvam.net'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA); C ooper, Thuy (FAA); Ferritto, Michelle (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information - Perfect View Aerial Media, LLC



## January 7, 2015

Mr. Ben Richardson Perfect View Aerial Media, LLC 7379 Lions Gate Road, Suite 108 Coconut Creek, FL 33073

Dear Mr. Richardson:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0845). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration to process your petition. Please submit the additional information to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headqua rters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov

.

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed.

 Provide description of proximity to airports.

Please provide the additional information by January 21, 2014.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
#### J. Bruce VINING, Appellant, v. Charles SUTTON, Appellee.

No. 70-438.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 12, 1971.

Edward C. Vining, Jr., and R. M. MacArthur, Miami, for appellant.

*731J. Leo McShane, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment for the plaintiff entered after a trial without jury. The essential question presented on the appeal is whether the record reveals evidence as to a consideration for the written personal promise of a corporate officer to pay a corporation debt. The evidence before the court was sufficient to support a finding that the . plaintiff agreed to forego legal action, including possible lien rights, in return for the written promise. The record is sufficient to support the judgment. Knight & Wall Co. v. Tampa Sand Lime Brick Co., 55 Fla. 728, 46 So. 285 (1908) ; Henderson v. Kendrick, 82 Fla. 110, 89 So. 635 (1921); see 7 Fla. Jur., Contracts § 49.

Affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 1 624

_____________________________
D. A. B., a child
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Thomas H. Williams , Judge

. February 8, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , B ILBREY , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Coates International, Ltd. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Form
10-Q”), I, George J. Coates, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




Dated: November 13, 2008
                By:
                /s/ George
      J. CoatesGeorge
      J. CoatesPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer
                  and Principal Executive Officer
or DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—SUREAU OF THE CENSUS mi epenssne bimmier No HES i nr nb

“sua. x -
coun.
‘Tom on ona MSI OF COUNTY apres orem wecracecemciaoy re wees vat er nes aL ae a cme eer — wae orem fect paaanlen S¥0y

FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1920--POPULATION [Exuuanamon Distuct Wo—74le__|__1o. A

ENUMERATED BY ME ON fH. -12=aa_2 DAY OF. 1620 Apa ad 7 /'

sour Las errsiretapanir w 1
. H
7 le Zt =z 2
Ma la cf fol
ana
Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau “op 4a} fone
£ é aman
Visit tt://wavw.orcives.aov for more information about publicly avallable records like the one shown here.
reer a aA t i
“tt Howimur'se ava 2 Pha Te ATTA ET
PE arts aed neck Zi Z fs
Wheels nA 7s ee 7? 4 (4. he
Lb rl ielel at 2 is
vA PUTT a UP spall Y 4 Es te, r ua! 2
Whee AAG a ROT OW BEETS a ECOY POO tpn
ery Weal tesla 4. foetal eT nse
ly: ale PY Maha aasassst sponds Ye 10
ra lca tp ry bat Hs z ava
= Z alge lal tele coll aah vA Fe a a
a] eral bee Dennad dL rar rama ee)
3 Lit 7 cota ? zi ie
TM L la ts ao AS Yet ui
st Zi iva Hs Bennaed ths is
aa va DoGlte alee bia Bz Bs: yy, ton
a zs rae) We 7 vs Le
at rs NEE ia iaapdl Z ea TI Ia wo
a Heal TIS (alll aol i 7 lad < 235
ok rm Waal Tee dely tha
e ve Ell Pate flo | iced Het
3 ORIN Wlaes Satcebdh oT fs
= Ferpoie m cInHEe eat Sm fe rae
“| E a abel a 15°
of ub Lwler Pea = Bread Ved
a. Heat Foetal Halal 2 Lofnaledt 1 atiaiLal | I
q aad F :
q 4 atiict Vell a
3 Tas mE? =
_ dee Wa TS tL
ng
eg 4st ulielS tha: a
. f alot tals
al Diaamack, Ew u 4. Z| Baader
Q ead CEVA Lacie EY oealed | eagle Med Oe
s om Lue rma laf 4 ‘7
bg lb apa ook Wi Dacdagacs ara
a] Bek 0 Bawghta = ia Md = rn
= Le tallnade wiact Sad Se I RP A