alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                              (Shares in Thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Nine Months Ended
                                                                                September 30,
                                                                       -----------------------------
                                                                           1999             1998
                                                                       ------------     ------------
<S>                                                                    <C>              <C>

Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding ..............          248,934          247,687

Dilutive weighted average shares issuable on exercise of stock
     options less shares repurchasable from proceeds .............              218             --
                                                                       ------------     ------------

Diluted weighted average number of common and common
     equivalent shares ...........................................          249,152          247,687
                                                                       ============     ============


Income (loss) from continuing operations (millions) ..............     $       78.3     $      (22.2)
Income from discontinued operations (millions) ...................            133.2             18.8
                                                                       ------------     ------------
Net income (millions) ............................................     $      211.5     $       (3.4)
                                                                       ============     ============


Per share - basic and diluted
Income (loss) from continuing operations .........................     $       0.31     $      (0.09)
Income from discontinued operations ..............................             0.54             0.08
                                                                       ------------     ------------
Net income (loss) ................................................     $       0.85     $      (0.01)
                                                                       ============     ============
</TABLE>
#### Edward Francis MALLOY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-763.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 14, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1971.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Frank H. White, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reyes v. Kelly, Fla.1969, 224 So.2d 303.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                      18,887
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         286
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,089
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      69,682
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        71,859
<LOANS>                                    257,511
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             360,623
<DEPOSITS>                                 307,966
<SHORT-TERM>                                10,600
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,948
<LONG-TERM>                                    990
<COMMON>                                     8,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             360,623
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             21,046
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,070
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               389
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            25,505
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,797
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,797
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       16,708
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,490
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             15,147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,985
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,947
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                18.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                18.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                8.29
<LOANS-NON>                                 11,279
<LOANS-PAST>                                    76
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,258
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,637
<RECOVERIES>                                   564
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,675
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 15




                  AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




August 14, 1997

Union Pacific Resources Group Inc.
801 Cherry Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. for the periods ended June
30, 1996 and 1997, as indicated in our report dated July 16, 1997; because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-22655 on Form S-3
and No. 333-22613 on Form S-8.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Fort Worth, Texas
Table 9.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  2001 and 2000

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                          Standard
                                          error on Standard     2001
Type                        2001     2000     2001 error on  Percent
                        estimate estimate estimate differencof total

All housing units....... 121,480  119,628      171      243      100

  Occupied.............. 107,010  105,720      180      255       88
    Owner occupied......  72,593   71,250      181      256       60
    Renter occupied.....  34,417   34,470      146      206       28

  Vacant................  14,470   13,908      101      141       12
    Year-round vacant...  10,916   10,439       88      124        9
      For rent..........   3,203    3,024       49       68        3
      For sale only.....   1,301    1,148       31       43        1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy     882      856       26       36        1
      Held off market...   5,530    5,411       64       90        5
        For occasional u   1,887    1,892       38       53        2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence    1,064    1,037       28       40        1
        For other reason   2,579    2,482       44       62        2

    Seasonal vacant.....   3,554    3,469       52       72        3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000757262
<NAME> FNB BANKING COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      13,000,934
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         500,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               215,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,571,333
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,078,893
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,439,648
<LOANS>                                    151,482,414
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,707,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             202,781,915
<DEPOSITS>                                 174,544,401
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,842,081
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,837,303
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       807,800
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,750,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             202,781,915
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             15,703,957
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,637,713
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               400,018
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            17,741,688
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,264,309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,394,838
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,346,850
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  530,075
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              11,535
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,776,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,385,993
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,385,993
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,920,459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.58
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,259,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   256,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,012,795
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,031,039
<RECOVERIES>                                   196,082
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,707,913
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,707,913
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3


 


Chain Bridge I


 


Registration and Shareholder Rights Agreement
Joinder


 


By executing and delivering
this signature page, David G. Brown (the “Participant”) hereby acknowledges and agrees that Chain Bridge I (the “Company”)
has agreed to grant to Participant 30,000 RSUs subject to and in accordance with that certain Letter Agreement, dated as of October 13,
2022, as may be amended, by and among the Company and the Participant. Further each of the Company and Chain Bridge Group, a Cayman Islands
exempted limited liability company (“Sponsor”) and the Participant hereby acknowledge and agree that the Participant
hereby joins in, becomes a party to and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of that certain Registration and Shareholder Rights
Agreement dated as of November 9, 2021, as may be amended, by and among the Company, the Sponsor, CB Co-Investment LLC and the Holders
(as such term is defined therein) (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which the Participant shall be
bound by and subject to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement as a “Holder” (as defined in the Registration Rights
Agreement).


 


The undersigned hereby authorizes this signature
page or a copy hereof to be attached to the Registration Rights Agreement or counterparts thereof.


 


Dated: October 13, 2022


 


	COMPANY:	 
	 	 
	CHAIN BRIDGE I	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Michael Rolnick	 
	Name: Michael Rolnick	 
	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 


 


	SPONSOR:	 
	 	 
	CHAIN BRIDGE GROUP	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Michael Rolnick	 
	Name: Michael Rolnick	 


 


	PARTICIPANT: 
	 
	By:	/s/ David G. Brown	 
	Name: David G. Brown
#### Joseph POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 811.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 19, 1968.

See also Fla.App., 206 So.2d 47.

*147W. D. Frederick, Jr., Public Defender, and William B. Barnett, Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WHITE, JOSEPH S., Associate Judge.

Appellant was tried and convicted on an information charging murder in the second degree. H was represented by a public defender throughout the trial.

Two questions are argued on this appeal. The first is:

> “The trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial or to strike the testimony of the witness Marie Hill, of its own motion, when it appeared that Mrs. Hill constantly referred to the victim as her husband, throughout her testimony.”

A similar question was before this court in Wolfe v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 133.

In the case at bar deceased’s widow was called to testify on the state’s behalf. Important events in the case had taken place in her presence. Her testimony was offered in support of the prosecution. It was against the defendant. No objection was made when the particular testimony now challenged was offered. There may have been a good reason for withholding objection. It is possible that defendant’s counsel at the time preferred to have the witness establish the relationship for impeachment purposes. It would be arguable that the witness’ testimony should be discounted because of her close relationship to the deceased. Thus it might well have been considered at the time that the testimony in question was useful to the defendant.

It is well-settled that questions of this character may not be raised for the first time on appeal. See Fitzgerald v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 511.

The second question is:

> “The Court committed error in failing to strike the testimony of the witness, Jack Bushor, over objection of the defense when Jack Bushor testified that he had seen the defendant strike the victim’s wife, Mrs. Marie Hill.”

The incident in question as described by the witness was part of the res gestae and the testimony was not objectionable.

Affirmed.

REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 24, 2011

d1017 

# Order

October 24, 2011

142964(20)(23)(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142964 COA: 302803 Oakland CC: 2009-229563-FC JOSEPH MELVIN ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 28, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. The motions to remand are DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1560 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1560

 To allow certain emergency relief amounts to be made available to the 
   Federal Highway Administration to use for disasters occurring in 
                          calendar year 2013.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 2013

   Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself and Mr. Bennet) introduced the 
following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, 
                               and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow certain emergency relief amounts to be made available to the 
   Federal Highway Administration to use for disasters occurring in 
                          calendar year 2013.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deficit Neutral Disaster Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY RELIEF PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of Transportation may obligate not more than $450,000,000 of 
the amounts made available to carry out section 125 of title 23, United 
States Code, under chapter 9 of title X of division A of the Disaster 
Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113-2; 127 Stat. 34) under 
the heading ``emergency relief program'' under the heading ``federal-
aid highways'' under the heading ``Federal Highway Administration'' for 
emergency relief projects in the State of Colorado arising from damage 
caused by flooding events in that State in calendar year 2013.
    (b) Emergency Designation for Congressional Enforcement.--In the 
Senate, this Act is designated as an emergency requirement pursuant to 
section 403(a) of S. Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the concurrent 
resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010.
    (c) Emergency Designation for Statutory PAYGO.--This Act is 
designated as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 4(g) of the 
Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-139; 2 U.S.C. 
933(g)).
                                 <all>
```
fecal

i CRED ©
z romped 85 te Li t Amt i
BEE fiterde nos. | ie
a os mt dy ot Jam, A, wan ‘ii eneens
i Heise ew. } } rx —
; wil OIE Lf iid
12 se 7 e ° tomim = 1 4
7 T

a! Yul. Bids er , bas | hHe, wy

f(a Datta [abe] ra B .

by iE Varah ; 42 iy | Teorderr 4 2

ae OO be 20 Sizahan telat 5 4
hig! Geer? ” 16) jee W ; ri s

fe al losincl.) Phendih 19 | me r Ale

7 “oo ?

> eet Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau. |g
° Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here. Sia .
Watehiae, 7 woyey | | Madd, 2” f
tel ” AFG.
Te .

4 He,

hy Me A SA att 1/

i ee 17 A A “ / 1
| bdwnasd, fe 6
aes | 1s
£4 TT Ld

b. 1 Hacrfed. hy [2d Al ts
ee wr ED | 6al onl | once ”
: K. [one ibe ib uo

eet det [oly | +

i | oo wane Hc aad Va : bee
oy PA a er oe 7 | bat
thy Mary Buctt 78) t |_| tt Homost | ig)

nai Weelia Geeelrebh.. | Maud | iy

h | 4
|. ai }

b bushy a i | HPL A it ier
15 EE LF 9 A A thea | 7 ”
j 88) 36) Pe sav oO Morse L|15\TM| | Mone {Ssooe A Hb, | bt
pg ME 7 ee a

bgt YAEL sais dace | 98) one, Merten | Bene Haus, / fant!

ny | Bung rs cw See j ws 1.” Se

jg A a ES : Mya | 4 a
py EE ZA 4 c/a wp | ae
Wt Wille “Liaerte, 7 wl those Ammons | one Prune on
ape dl : +7 138i ft | | Be pi

i “Tarra BaTag| 9 7 | | 7
Dag uy Free 2 «| || Wir | a
las ] T ] | What | T
mie A bial
Abo Magne | , —
| D/A hi
Ei ede p
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2200

IN RE: JAMES E. REID,
Debtor,

--------------------------- JAMES E. REID, Debtor - Appellant, versus
KNARF INVESTMENTS, Defendant - Appellee, and ELLEN W. COSBY, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-2899-BEL; BK-01-50422-SD) Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 1, 2006 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James E. Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Richard L. Costella, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: James E. Reid appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders dismissing his Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition and entering a consent order lifting the automatic stay. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeReid v. Knarf Investments , Nos. CA-04-2899-BEL; BK-01-50422-SD (D. Md. filed Sept. 28, 2005 & entered Sept. 29, 2005). We deny Reid’s motions for stay pending appeal and to vacate the district court’s order and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED