alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form 15-6
DEPARTMENT OF COM}.ERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS

————-_tacorpoetet place gad een was FIFTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1930

sa bates...

7 POPULATION SCHEDULE

(County tes Be fer Y

Township or other

Institution_____ .... Enumerated by me on pratt 17 _--» 1930 ——
(Insert name of institation, if any, and indicate the lines on which the entries are made. See instructions.) 7 : ,

Unincorporated place __...______

division of county Sete Sse Solel leianeinenibneaiincomin
(Insert proper name and also nawie of class, as township, town, precinct, district, eto. See instructions.) (Enter name of any unincorporated place having approximately 600 inhabitants or more. See instructions.)

PLACE OF ABODE NAME

| Nom- of each person whose place of abode on

dock eer] April 1, 1930, was in this family

Eater surname first, then the given name and
middle Hany

Sustado avery pores ae ecco sot ee Omit

MOTHER TONGUE (OR NATIVE OCCUPATION AND INDUSTRY
Whether actually

EDUCATION PL BIRTH
cents! LANGUAGE) OF FOREIGN BORN :
2 far the etrece, | eran of U.S.

3 OCCUPATION INDUSTRY nd working d3y) | Silitary

5

Hi
all

HOME DATA

RELATION

Relationship of a

this person to 3 i
8

_ r)

s

Place of birth of each person enumerated and of his or her parents. If born in CODE

$3
> the United States, give State or Territo If of foreign ve country in
3 35 give ry. birth, gi try k F
which birthplace is now situated. (See Instructions.) Distinguisk Canada- ahcone helere a eee

: French from Canada-English, and Irish Free State from Northern Ireland coming to the| ‘es columns)

Trade, profession, or cular | Industry or business, an cof- 8
8 Oe Wo ga Bere ne s store, vg | Ham, tine You | What
war or

the head of the
family

Year of immigra-

at last
irthday

tion to the
United States

z
§ — riveter, teach- shipyard, pu
Gaem-
3 United States | si H ‘o or
ai T. nie |X | dita?

é

live on a farm?
Color or race
Marital con-
dition
Age at first

Does this family

-
2 30 rs) |

Sex
g

}

—
~

H
:
1
—
LC]
,

WES [|

vary Me aa

Els

1\

ax r
BPP

¥ '
1 '

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

AREVIATIONS TO BE USED
i IN COLUMNS INDICATED:

bbreviations fer State or country of birth
(Uae meaber Congne (Coluzans 18, 19, 20, ad 21)}

* eee
a ee Cols. 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, and 25—For all per-

Sikoee seer te Negro... Wi Hinde. ad First P spat “sen : i sons.
entry for -- 7 a; Soke hee ptt: va : ENTRIES ARE REQUIRED IN THE in
op uae Bie SE OO no Bae bode uy wes pcemet. = a, bade mega SEVERAL COLUMNS AS FOLLOWS: } TM 7otnren te coty fo ee emt ee (Cale 8
Col. ll—Male...... M . ip Tees Col, ‘x married persons only.
Female... F Wacken Cel. 17—Far ail persons 10 years of age sad over.

eR EE aR eT +
BRIAN QUINN Chief Justice
PATRICK A. PIRTLE Justice JUDY C. PARKER Justice
LAWRENCE M. DOSS Justice 

## Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas Potter County Courts Building 501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449 www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx BOBBY RAMIREZ Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 9540 79105-9540
(806) 342-2650 January 8, 2021 Cedric DeWayne McNeal TDCJ-ID #2317254 Montford Unit 8602 Peach Street Lubbock, TX 79404 John L. Owen Assistant District Attorney 501 South Fillmore Street, Suite 5A Amarillo, TX 79101 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Hillary Netardus Attorney at Law P.O. Box 50652 Amarillo, TX 79159 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-20-00013-CR, 07-20-00014-CR, 07-20-00015-CR, 07-20-00016-

CR Trial Court Case Number: 76,641-B, 76,642-B, 76,722-B, 77,067-B Style: Cedric Dewayne McNeal v. The State of Texas Dear Mr. McNeal and Counsel: The Court this day issued an opinion and judgment in the captioned cause. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 48. In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on file with this Court, if any , will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the Court. Very truly yours, 

# Bobby Ramirez Bobby Ramirez, Clerk

cc: Honorable John B. Board (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Honorable Dan L. Schaap (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Carley Snider (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Exhibit 4.6.1

                                JOINDER AGREEMENT

      THIS JOINDER AGREEMENT ("Joinder Agreement") dated as of December 21, 1998
among CONGOLEUM CORPORATION ("CONGOLEUM Corp."), CONGOLEUM INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTIES, INC. ("Intellectual"), CONGOLEUM FINANCIAL CORPORATION ("Financial";
Congoleum Corp., Intellectual and Financial shall be referred to collectively as
"Borrowers") and FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK ("Lender"). All terms capitalized but
not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Loan
Agreement (as such term is hereinafter defined).

                                   BACKGROUND

      A. Corporation and Lender entered into a certain Loan and Security
Agreement ("Loan Agreement") dated as of December 18, 1998 pursuant to which
Lender made available to the Borrowers the revolving credit facility described
therein.

      NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows, intending to be legally
bound.

      1. Intellectual and Financial, each individually, hereby: (a) shall be,
become and is a Borrower under, in accordance with and subject to the terms and
conditions of the Loan Agreement; (b) joins in and agrees to be bound by and to
perform in accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement; (c) confirms that
Borrowers are jointly and severally liable to Lender for all the Liabilities;
(d) hereby pledges, transfers, assigns and delivers and grants to Lender a lien
on and security interest in and to the Collateral; and (e) confirms the truth
and accuracy of the representations and warranties in the Loan Agreement as of
the date hereof insofar as they relate to it.

      2. Intellectual and Financial, each individually, hereby agrees to deliver
to Lender within twenty (20) days of the execution hereof such UCC-1 financing
statements and other documents and agreements as Lender may request to perfect
its interest in the Collateral owned by them. Borrowers hereby agree that
failure to deliver such agreements within twenty (20) days of execution hereof
shall constitute an Event of Default under the Loan Agreement.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound,
have caused this Joinder Agreement to be executed by their respective officers
thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.

CONGOLEUM CORPORATION                     CONGOLEUM INTELLECTUAL
                                          PROPERTIES, INC.

By:                                       By:
   ----------------------------              ----------------------------
   Howard N. Feist III                       Name:
   Sr. Vice President - Finance              Title:


CONGOLEUM FINANCIAL CORPORATION           FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK


By:                                       By:
   ----------------------------              ----------------------------
   Name:                                       Name:
   Title:                                      Title:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40262

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISRAEL CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-561-3

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Israel Cruz has requested

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cruz was informed of counsel’s 

motion but has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
NO. 07-11-00472-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 11, 2012

IVAN PAUDA, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2009-424,455; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Following an open plea of guilty, appellant, Ivan Pauda, was convicted of 

aggravated robbery with an affirmative finding of the use of a deadly weapon, and 

sentenced by a jury to 20 years incarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal 

Justice, Institutional Division. The clerk=s record was filed on January 6, 2012.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) requires that a trial court shall 

enter a Certification of Defendant=s Right of Appeal each time it enters a judgment of 

guilt or other appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); Hargesheimer v. State, 182 
2

S.W.3d 906, 911 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006). An appeal must be dismissed if the certification 

has not been made part of the record under the applicable rules. TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d). Additionally, the certification must be signed by the defendant and a copy must 

be given to him. Id. The certification must also include a notice that the defendant has 

been informed of his rights concerning appeal, as well as his right to file a pro se 

petition for discretionary review.1 

The certification contained in the clerk=s record in this case states that this was 

not a plea-bargain case, and that appellant has the right of appeal. However, the 

certification was not signed by appellant. Therefore, the certification on file is defective.

Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for 

further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means 

necessary to secure a certification of defendant=s right of appeal that complies with Rule 

25.2(d). Once properly executed, the certification shall be included in a supplemental 

clerk=s record and filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before February 8, 2012.

This order constitutes notice to all parties of the defective certification pursuant to 

Rule 37.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1. If a 

supplemental clerk=s record containing a proper certification is not filed in accordance 

with this order, this matter will be referred to the Court for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(d).

 

1

The proper form for Certification of Defendant=s Right of Appeal is contained in 

Appendix F of the 2011 Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
3

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
#### Willie Clyde SOLOMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Willie Clyde Solomon, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the *377appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
#### Alfreddie GRANT, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. O-352.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 9, 1971.

*633Alfreddie Grant, in pro per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

SPECTOR, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of an order denying his motion to vacate his conviction and sentence predicated upon his plea of guilty to charges of second degree murder. Petitioner was originally charged with first degree murder, which crime occurred during the commission of a robbery, and was found guilty of first degree murder by a jury which withheld its recommendation of mercy, in consequence whereof the death penalty was imposed. On direct appeal, the Florida Supreme Court reversed on the ground of improper comments by the prosecutor during the course of his argument to the jury. Grant v. State, 194 So.2d 612 (Fla.1967).

When the case went back for retrial after the reversal, petitioner being then and there represented by counsel elected to enter a plea of guilty to the lesser charge of second degree murder. After ascertaining the vol-untariness of said guilty plea and determining that it was knowingly made, the trial judge accepted the same and in due course imposed a life sentence upon petitioner. The plea and sentence thereon were entered in 1967.

Soon thereafter petitioner filed a motion to vacate the said judgment and sentence which was denied. Petitioner’s appeal from said order of denial was quashed by this, court on March 7, 1968, on grounds that the said appeal was frivolous. Shortly thereafter, petitioner again filed his second motion to vacate the judgment and sentence. It too was denied and said denial was affirmed by this court in February of 1969.

Now petitioner has filed an original petition for writ of habeas corpus in this court alleging the illegality of his detention by virtue of the allegedly erroneous denials of his prior efforts to set aside his conviction and sentence as related above.

We have reviewed all of petitioner’s contentions and find them to be without merit. On the contrary, the record in this cause and the records on appeal in petitioner’s prior appearances before this court, Cases Nos. J-306 and K-303, make it amply clear that petitioner’s guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily made and therefore cannot now be attacked. See Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747; McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763; and Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, 90 S.Ct. 1458, 1474, 25 L.Ed. 2d 785.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., concur.
#### MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH *&*ACCIDENT ASSOCIATION and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Earnest WEISS, Appellee.

No. 72-1056.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Milton F. STEINHARDT, Petitioner, v. The FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION and A. D. Saker, Respondents.

No. 72-930.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 7, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied,
EXHIBIT 11
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                     Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                        September 30,          September 30,
                                    1996         1995        1996        1995
<S>                             <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>   
Weighted average number of 
  common shares outstanding      10,920,449   7,264,411   10,815,498   6,969,309

Shares issuable pursuant to
  warrants and employee stock 
  option plan, less shares
  assumed repurchased at the 
  average fair value during the
  period (1)                              -   1,131,123            -   1,131,123
                                -----------   ---------   ----------   ---------

Number of shares for
  computation of earnings
  per share                      10,920,449   8,395,534   10,815,498   8,100,432
                                ===========   =========   ==========   =========


Net income (loss)               $(2,232,000) $  143,000  $(3,532,000) $    5,000

Minority interest (2)                     -       1,000            -     (22,000)
                                -----------  ----------  -----------  ----------

Net income (loss) for
  computation of net income
  (loss) per share              $(2,232,000) $  144,000  $(3,532,000) $  (17,000)
                                ===========  ==========  ===========  ==========


Net income (loss) per
  share (3)                         $ (0.20)     $ 0.02      $ (0.33) $    (0.00)
                                    =======      ======      =======       =====

<FN>
(1) Excluded in loss periods as impact would be anti-dilutive.
(2) To adjust net income (loss) for minority interest related to the minority
    shares exchanged.
(3) There is no difference between primary and fully diluted net income (loss)
    per share.
</TABLE>
#### JACK PARKER CONSTRUCTION OF FLORIDA CORP. NO. 3, Appellant, v. William MARKHAM, as Tax Assessor of Broward County, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 15, 1974.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
May 31, 1999 consolidated financial statements] and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,285
<PP&E>                                         147,058
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 235,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          205,516
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,942
<OTHER-SE>                                    (163,226)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,680
<SALES>                                        308,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               308,556
<CGS>                                          141,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               172,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,801)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,801)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,801)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.0)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

VENTURI PARTNERS, INC. AND AFFILIATES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Venturi Partners, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, James C. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ James C. HuntJames C. Hunt
Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Venturi Partners, Inc.
and will be retained by Venturi Partners, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

36
**Exhibit 21**

**VideoDisplay CorporationSubsidiary Companies**

| Lexel Imaging  Systems, Inc. |   | Aydin Displays, Inc.    |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
| 1501 Newtown Pike                 |   | 1 Riga Lane                  |
| Lexington, Kentucky               |   | Birdsboro, Pennsylvania      |
|                              |   |                         |
| Fox International Ltd., Inc. |   | Mengel Industries, Inc. |
| 23600 Aurora Road                 |   | 3110 West Ridge Pike         |
| Bedford Heights, Ohio             |   | Sanatoga, Pennsylvania       |
|                              |   |                         |
| Southwest Vacuum Devices, Inc     |   |                         |
| 1868 Tucker Industrial Drive      |   |                         |
| Tucker, Georgia                   |   |                         |
|                              |   |                         |
| Video Display (Europe), Ltd.      |   |                         |
| Unit 5 Old Forge Trading Estate   |   |                         |
| Dudley Road, Stourbridge          |   |                         |
| West Midlands DY9 8EL             |   |                         |
| England                           |   |                         |
|                              |   |                         |
| Z-Axis, Inc.                 |   |                         |
| 15 Eagle Street                   |   |                         |
| Phelps, New York                  |   |                         |
|                              |   |                         |
| Teltron Technologies, Inc.   |   |                         |
| 2 Riga Lane                       |   |                         |
| Birdsboro, PA                     |   |                         |

 

----