alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Second Quarter 2002 and 2001



                                    Rental vacancy rates


                          Second       Second      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           2002         2001       2002 rate   difference


United States..........         8.5          8.3          0.2          0.3

  Inside MAs...........         8.2          7.9          0.2          0.3
    In central cities..         8.6          8.4          0.2          0.4
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         7.7          7.4          0.3          0.4
  Outside MAs..........        10.2         10.5          0.5          0.7

 Northeast.............         5.6          5.3          0.3          0.5
 Midwest...............         9.7         10.3          0.4          0.6
 South.................        10.7         10.8          0.3          0.5
 West..................         6.7          5.7          0.3          0.4



                                    Homeowner vacancy rates


                          Second       Second      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           2002         2001       2002 rate   difference

United States..........         1.7          1.8          0.1          0.1

  Inside MAs...........         1.6          1.6          0.1          0.1
    In central cities..         2.3          2.2          0.1          0.2
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         1.3          1.3          0.1          0.1
  Outside MAs..........         2.1          2.5          0.1          0.2

 Northeast.............         1.4          1.2          0.1          0.2
 Midwest...............         1.8          1.9          0.1          0.2
 South.................         1.9          2.0          0.1          0.1
 West..................         1.4          1.6          0.1          0.2

     (z) Less than 0.05.
# EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Allen E. Larson, certify that:

1.    
          I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;

2.    
          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    
          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
          included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
          condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
          the periods presented in this report;

4.    
          The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for
          establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
          Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a)    
          designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
          information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
          made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
          in which this report is being prepared;

b)    
          evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
          by this report based on such evaluation.

c)    
          disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent
          fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
          materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting;
          and

5.    
          The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
          most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
          Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of
          directors:

a)    
          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
          of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
          adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and
          report financial information; and

b)    
          any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
          who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over
          financial reporting.

|Date: 71405 | /s/  Allen E. Larson                   
|------------- | ---------------------------------------
|              |                                        
|              | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

---
#### Raymond FAIRCHILD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-361.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rare Medium
Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Glenn S. Meyers as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Michael A. Hultberg
as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, and Craig C. Chesser as
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                      By: /s/ GLENN S. MEYERS
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Name:  Glenn S. Meyers
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                          Date:  March 4, 2003


                                      By: /s/ MICHAEL A. HULTBERG
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Name:  Michael A. Hultberg
                                          Title: Principal Accounting Officer
                                          Date:  March 4, 2003


                                      By:  /s/ CRAIG C. CHESSER
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Name:  Craig C. Chesser
                                           Title: Principal Financial Officer
                                           Date:  March 4, 2003


         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00561-CV

CITY OF WESLACO, TEXAS

v.

CHRISTOPHER DE LEON, D/B/A DE LEON

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL

On Appeal from the

93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-2190-20-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in 

accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 25, 2022
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947986

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          3,846,073
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 131,353,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                       75,000
<INVENTORY>                                       173,920
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 92,903,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                        14,385,279
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     27,041,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   92,903,706
<SALES>                                         1,558,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,558,019
<CGS>                                             311,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  546,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                574,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      125,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.40
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-81,487-01 IN RE OSCAR ORLANDO ORTIZ, Re lator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1150848-A IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursua n t t o the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an a pplication for a

writ of habe as cor

pus in the 182nd District Court of Har ris County , that mo re t h an 3 5 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et been forwa rded to this Court. The district court enter ed an order desig nating issues on J uly

16, 2013. Respondent, the J udg e of the 182nd District Court of Har ris County , shall file a resp o nse with this Court by having the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such habea s corpus application. I n the alterna tive, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order desig nating issues and then have-2-

the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such application. I n either case , Respondent’s answe r shall be submitt ed within 30 day s of the date of this o rd er . T h i s appli cation for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abe y ance until R espondent ha s submitt ed his response

.

Filed: May

20, 2015 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Allen E. Larson, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:


a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


c)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and


5.
        The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors:


a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.




Date:
        November 27, 2006
        
        
        /s/  Allen E. LarsonController and Chief Accounting Officer


---
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Richard Harrison POORE, Appellee.

No. 70-250.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 87TH DISTRICT COURT OF ANDERSON COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 13th

day of August, 2014 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

CHRISTOPHER JOEL DAVEY, Appellant

NO. 12-13-00002-CV; Trial Court No. 87-11313

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

MARGARETT JORDAN ROYALTIES, INC., Appellees

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the oral arguments, appellate record, and 

briefs filed herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no 

error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of 

the court below be in all things affirmed, and that all costs of this appeal are hereby adjudged 

against the appellant, CHRISTOPHER JOEL DAVEY, for which execution may issue, and 

that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 5

th day of May, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             607
<SECURITIES>                                     8,988
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                       647
<INVENTORY>                                      6,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,387
<PP&E>                                           4,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                     280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,445
<BONDS>                                          1,526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              139
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,841
<SALES>                                            489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   643
<CGS>                                              385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (280)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (280)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31(i)(a)**
**Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**
I, Dr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Professional Veterinary Products,Ltd.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registration, and we have:
     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based onsuch evaluation; and
     (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 14, 2005.      /s/ Dr. Lionel L. Reilly      Dr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and Chief      Executive Officer
#### MR. LAND, INC., Appellant, v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, a public corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-758.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 20, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Walter (Bud) HILL, Appellant, v. Donald F. HERR and Ruby A. Herr, his wife, Appellees.

No. 71-220.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 28, 1971.

E. Paul Beatty, Miami, for appellant.

Ward, Ward, Straessley, Hiss & Heath, Miami, for appellees.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Trowbridge, Inc. v. Hathaway, Fla.1970, 233 So.2d 129.