alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 12-3274

___________________________ Elsie M. Mayard lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Anthony Tallarico; Carlos Wong; Chad Slagter; City of St. Paul lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________ Submitted: July 17, 2013 Filed: July 19, 2013 [Unpublished]

____________ Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Elsie M. Mayard appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse entry of judgment on a jury verdict in her 42 U.S.C . § 1983 action, and th e court’s subsequent 1 The Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, Unite d States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).denial of her motion for a ne w trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. Having reviewed the arguments raised in the Rule 59 motion, to the extent possible without a transcript of the three-day jury trial, th is court finds no clear abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of the Rule 59 motion. See Children’s Broadcasting Corp. v. Walt Disney Co. , 357 F.3d 860, 866-67 (8th Cir. 2004); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters and Joiners of Am. , 827 F.2d 384, 385-86 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). 2 And having carefully reviewed the arguments for reversal raised in Mayard’s brief, this court finds no other reversible error in these proceedings. This court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

2 In her brief, Mayard mentions or a lludes to certain other claims, but she stipulated to the dismissal of those claims be fore trial, so they will not be considered. -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,883
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,551
<INVENTORY>                                     12,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,869
<PP&E>                                         531,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 716,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,343
<BONDS>                                        533,048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       222,977
<OTHER-SE>                                   (188,636)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   716,102
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               664,058
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               571,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                42,659
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (693)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,553)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,424)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,175)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,152)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Midwest Air Group, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Timothy E. Hoeksema Timothy E. Hoeksema Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer  /s/ Curtis E. Sawyer Curtis E. Sawyer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date: April 25, 2007    A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Thomas Joseph ASSENZA, Appellant, v. Linda Adkins ASSENZA, Appellee.

No. R-301.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1331 

To extend the Generalized System of Preferences, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2013 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the Generalized System of Preferences, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF 

4 PREFERENCES. 

5 Section 505 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

6 2465) is amended by striking ‘‘July 31, 2013’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 

8 SEC. 2. CUSTOMS USER FEES. 

9 Section 13031(j)(3) of the Consolidated Omnibus 

10 Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)) 

11 is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1331 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘October 

2 22, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘January 21, 2022’’; and 

3 (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ‘‘Octo4 ber 29, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘January 28, 2022’’. 

5 SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED 

6 TAXES. 

7 Notwithstanding section 6655 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986, in the case of a corporation with assets 

9 of not less than $1,000,000,000 (determined as of the end 

10 of the preceding taxable year)— 

11 (1) the amount of any required installment of 

12 corporate estimated tax which is otherwise due in 

13 July, August, or September of 2018 shall be in14 creased by 1.25 percent of such amount (determined 

15 without regard to any increase in such amount not 

16 contained in such Code); and 

17 (2) the amount of the next required installment 

18 after an installment referred to in paragraph (1) 

19 shall be appropriately reduced to reflect the amount 

20 of the increase by reason of such paragraph. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

RYAN DUBOISE,

Appellant

v.

KIMBERLY SMITH, KERI MOORE AND BOB RUMCIK,

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 7 EAP 2020

Appeal from the Order entered on
December 16, 2019, exited on December 17, 2019, in the

Commonwealth Court at No. 465 MD

2019.

O RDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: August 18, 2020

AND NOW

, this 18 th day of August , 2020

, the order of the Commonwealth Court

is AFFIRMED

.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Gabriel Battista, Chief Executive Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company"),  have  reviewed  the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly  period  ended  March 31, 2003 and, based on the inquiries I have made
or  caused  to  be  made  in  the  fulfillment  of  my  responsibilities  as the
Chief  Executive  Officer of  Talk  America  Holdings,  Inc.,  I  hereby certify
that:

     (i)  the  Talk America Holdings, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly  period  ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii)
the  information  contained  in  such  Report  fairly  presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of operation of Talk America
Holdings,  Inc.

This  certificate  is  being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief  Executive Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other
purposes.  A  signed  original of this written statement required by Section 906
has  been  provided  to Talk America Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Talk
America  Holdings,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.


/s/  Gabriel  Battista
----------------------
Gabriel  Battista
Chief  Executive  Officer
May  14,  2003
#### Claude PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. SUN OIL COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 36607.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1967.

Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, for petitioner.

Boyd, Jenerette & Leemis, Jacksonville, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, - for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date June 22, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1521 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1521

To prohibit Federal agencies from requiring seafood to be certified as 
sustainable by a third party nongovernmental organization and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2013

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit Federal agencies from requiring seafood to be certified as 
sustainable by a third party nongovernmental organization and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsible Seafood Certification 
and Labeling Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SEAFOOD SUSTAINABILITY CERTIFICATION 
              REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Prohibition.--No executive agency may--
            (1) require or reference a certificate of sustainability, 
        or otherwise identify as sustainable, based on criteria or 
        standards developed by a third party nongovernmental 
        organization in awarding a contract for--
                    (A) the procurement of fish or seafood; or
                    (B) concessions or vending, including the sale of 
                fish or seafood; or
            (2) endorse the use of any label, standard, or other scheme 
        to certify fish or seafood as sustainable based on criteria or 
        standards developed by a third party nongovernmental 
        organization.
    (b) Executive Agency Defined.--In this section, the term 
``executive agency'' has the meaning given that term in section 133 of 
title 41, United States Code.
    (c) Effect on Regulations.--No rule, regulation, or guideline 
issued by an executive agency, including the Department of Health and 
Human Services, that requires or recommends that fish or seafood be 
certified as sustainable by a third party nongovernmental organization 
shall have any force or effect, including any rule, regulation, or 
guideline issued prior to the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Cutter & Buck Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on September 7, 2006 (“the Report”), I, Michael Gats,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respectsthe financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ MICHAEL  GATS                              |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael Gats                                   |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*                      |
|   | *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

1

----
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Housing Vacancies and Homeownership    >Homeownership Rates
 Skip to looking for section Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Housing Vacancies and Homeownership (CPS/HVS)
  Quarterly Vacancy and Homeownership Rates by State and MSA
  Table 1. Rental Vacancy Rates by State: 2005 - present
 Table 2. Homeowner Vacancy Rates by State: 2005 - present
 Table 3. Homeownership Rates by State: 2005-present
 Table 4. Rental Vacancy Rates for the 75 Largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas: 2015 to Present
 Table 4a. Rental Vacancy Rates for the 75 Largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas: 2005 to 2014
 Table 5. Homeowner Vacancy Rates for the 75 Largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas: 2015 to Present
 Table 5a. Homeowner Vacancy Rates for the 75 Largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas: 2005 to 2014
 Table 6. Homeownership Rates for the 75 Largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas: 2015 to Present
 Table 6a. Homeownership Rates for the 75 Largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas: 2005 to 2014
 Last Revised: January 30, 2024


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Appendix J: Interstate and Regional Coordination

1. Currently the State of New Mexico has not particip ate d in any re gional planning and/or inte rsta te co ordina tion o u tside ou r p a rticipa ti on with the W e stern Regional Air Partnership.

2. Currently there are no New Mexico Tribes participating in the im ple m e n tation plan.

NM Regi onal Haze SIP Page J-1 12/ 31/ 03
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 22, 2005
    /s/  Caryl P. ShepherdCaryl P. ShepherdChief Accounting Officer
#### Thomas BRODRICK, agent for Surety, Resolute Insurance Company, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and Charley Lee Thornton, Appellees.

No. 74-265.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 27, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Marvin U. Mounts, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>




                                  EXHIBIT 27.01

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

         This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from
Balance  Sheet,  Statement  of  Operations,  Statement  of Cash  Flows and Notes
thereto  incorporated in Part 1, Item 1, of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         351,568
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  243,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               1,746,645
<PP&E>                                                         72,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (69,096)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 2,934,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          352,472
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       3,005
<OTHER-SE>                                                     2,735,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   2,934,117
<SALES>                                                        1,405,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               1,407,582
<CGS>                                                          1,190,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  1,190,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               193,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                29,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   29,188
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            29,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   29,188
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.01



</TABLE>