alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jack L. Messman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc.,
certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Novell, Inc;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial information; and

      b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: January 13, 2005

/s/ Jack L. Messman
-------------------------------
Jack L. Messman
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### James Stuart GASTON, Petitioner, v. Honorable Don GENUNG, Sheriff, Pinellas County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-307.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 5, 1972.

Habeas corpus denied.
256 La. 763

#### Milton RICHARD et al. v. FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al.

No. 50821.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 31, 1970.

In re: Milton Richard applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 238 So.2d 386.

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Art. 7, Sect. 11, La.Const.
254 La. 137

#### Mrs. Mary H. TAIT et al. v. WESTERN WORLD INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 49835.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Mary H. Tait et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 220 So.2d 226.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
<PAGE>


                      [McGladrey & Pullen, LLP Letterhead]


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8, filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Commission")  on September 16, 1994 (Reg.  No.  33-84082) and the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 filed with the  Commission  on April 17,  1992 (Reg.  No.
33-47296) of our report,  dated February 25, 1997,  except for Notes 1 and 18 as
to which the date is March 24,  1997,  which  appears  on pages 49 and 50 of the
annual report on Form 10-K of First Central  Financial  Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1996.


/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

New Haven, Connecticut
April 14, 1997


<PAGE>
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

JOE WASHINGTON

NO. 2021 KW 1044

JANUARY 27, 2022

In Re: Joe Washington, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 03- 11- 0290. 

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

VGW

AHP

WIL

C OF APEAL F ST CIRCUIT

Q OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Table B-1.  Standard Errors of Vacancy Rates by Area:  1997
                   (Range of 68 chances out of 100)



    Rental                       Rate   Standard   Year-to-   Standard
                                  for   error on year diff-   error on
                                 year       rate     erence difference1

United States..............       7.7        0.1       -0.1        0.1
  Inside Metropolitan Areas       7.5        0.1       -0.1        0.2
    In central cities......       8.1        0.2       -0.1        0.2
    Not in central cities..       6.9        0.2       -0.1        0.2
  Outside Metropolitan Area       8.8        0.3                   0.4
  Northeast................       6.7        0.2       -0.6        0.3
  Midwest..................       8.0        0.2        0.1        0.3
  South....................       9.1        0.2        0.5        0.3
  West.....................       6.6        0.2       -0.6        0.3

                                   For-rent as a percent of all housing units

United States..............       2.6        (z)       -0.1        0.1
  Inside Metropolitan Areas       2.7        (z)       -0.1        0.1
  Outside Metropolitan Area       2.1        0.1                   0.1
  Northeast................       2.4        0.1       -0.3        0.1
  Midwest..................       2.3        0.1                   0.1
  South....................       2.8        0.1        0.1        0.1
  West.....................       2.6        0.1       -0.3        0.1


     Homeowner
                                 Rate   Standard   Year-to-   Standard
                                  for   error on year diff-   error on
                                 year       rate     erence difference1

United States..............       1.6        (z)                   (z)
  Inside Metropolitan Areas       1.6        (z)                   0.1
    In central cities......       1.9        0.1                   0.1
    Not in central cities..       1.4        (z)                   0.1
  Outside Metropolitan Area       1.9        0.1        0.2        0.1
  Northeast................       1.6        0.1                   0.1
  Midwest..................       1.2        0.1       -0.1        0.1
  South....................       1.9        0.1        0.1        0.1
  West.....................       1.8        0.1        0.1        0.1


                                   For-sale-only as a percent of all housing units

United States..............       1.0        (z)          -        (z)
  Inside Metropolitan Areas       0.9        (z)          -        (z)
  Outside Metropolitan Area       1.2        (z)        0.1        0.1
  Northeast................       0.9        (z)          -        0.1
  Midwest..................       0.8        (z)       -0.1        0.1
  South....................       1.1        (z)        0.1        (z)
  West.....................       1.0        (z)        0.1        0.1

  Z less than 0.05 percent.
  1Difference between 1997 rates and 1996 rates.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      445
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,812
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,920
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,852
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   326
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  80
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    107
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                107
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       107
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
#### Earl Bobby WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-86.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Georgene K. GROTHE, Appellant, v. Howard L. GROTHE, Appellee.

No. 70-935.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 30, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# A

http://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/data/ann12def.html
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1512 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1512 ES

1 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST THEODORE MATTHEW GLENDE 

2 POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Roch5 ester, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Theodore 

11 Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate November 12, 2013. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1512 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postdore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. Rochester, New York, as the ‘‘Specialist Theo- al Service located at 1335 Jefferson Road in
#### John McCRAW, Jr. v. Margaret M. MITCHELL, Jean M. Porter, Co-Executrices of the Estate of Sloane R. McCraw, Deceased.

No. 47167.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 5, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 18, 1973.

Lomax B. Lamb, Jr., Marks, for appellant.

Jacobs, Griffith & Hatcher, Cleveland, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Bolivar County; Partee L. Denton, Chancellor.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and SMITH, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BostonFed Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John A. Simas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                              
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
Report.



| | /s/ John A. Simas

Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
| | ------------------------------------------------------------
1

The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3440

___________

John K. Hulett, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Brink’s Home Security, Inc., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: August 28, 2006

Filed: August 29, 2006

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

John Hulett appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment in

his employment-discrimination action under the Age Discrimination in Employment

Act. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517,

520 (8th Cir. 2002) (de novo standard of review), we find the district court’s analysis

to be correct, thorough, and well-reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-126695) of Particle DrillingTechnologies, Inc. of our report dated December 14, 2005, except forNote 2 as to which the date is February 14, 2006 relating to theconsolidated financial statements of Particle Drilling TechnologiesInc.,  and our report dated December 14,2005, except as to the effect of the restatement described in MANAGEMENT’SREPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING (AS REVISED) as to whichthe date is February 14, 2006, relating to Particle DrillingTechnologies, Inc.’s management assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Particle Drilling Technologies Inc.,which appear on Form 10-K/A filed on February 14, 2006.

 
| /s/ UHY MANN FRANKFORT STEIN & LIPP CPAs, LLP |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |
| Houston, Texas                                         |
| February 14, 2006                                 |

 

----
-1------4f'.4''-U.JJL<L.<.j-- fuaz~lt. 

·l--------1------rJ,RYa;.d 

·'-·•------1------~ ~---

-1----------·--------1--LL----h----

-1--1--------I---___ .._4.£...... _ _,L,____

1-=e/u~At:......_ ___ , ____ l____c.,!;c[~P~/a~m~~~i~-I 

·l--''"'-'lfm~U'>-A:o«AA~/t--=::.M- __ __.-_ 1--------1---.#,-l------I 

1---~----?---1----~-l----4''------

,, 

C::., I 

r::/, 

1__,;~~~~--1------.l-"<'~~;~·~r,/ ____ I 

ri¥d£>LL 

J __ --.Jl-.U-...--A
II 

Calendar No. 135 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1292 

To prohibit the funding of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2013 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. RISCH, Mr. LEE, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

BLUNT, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. HELLER, Mr. 

BURR, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. ENZI, Mr. 

WICKER, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. MORAN, Mr. VITTER, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. CHAMBLISS, and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JULY 16 (legislative day, JULY 15), 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To prohibit the funding of the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defund Obamacare 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1292 PCS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi3 sion of law, no Federal funds shall be made available to 

4 carry out any provisions of the Patient Protection and Af5 fordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) or title I and sub6 title B of title II of the Health Care and Education Rec7 onciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152), or of the 

8 amendments made by either such Act. 

9 (b) LIMITATION.—No entitlement to benefits under 

10 any provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

11 Care Act (Public Law 111-148) or title I and subtitle B 

12 of title II of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation 

13 Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152), or the amendments 

14 made by either such Act, shall remain in effect on and 

15 after the date of the enactment of this Act, nor shall any 

16 payment be awarded, owed, or made to any State, District, 

17 or territory under any such provision. 

18 (c) UNOBLIGATED BALANCES.—Notwithstanding any 

19 other provision of law, all unobligated balances available 

20 under the provisions of law referred to in subsection (a) 

21 are hereby rescinded. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 135 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1292 

A BILL 

To prohibit the funding of the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act. 

JULY 16 (legislative day, JULY 15), 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ray EDGE et al., Appellees.

No. O-39.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Alice A. B. LATIMER, etc., et al., Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellee.

No. 71-1163.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 22, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
insd_ex1010.htm

EXHIBIT 10.10
  
  
  
  
  	 
	1
	

	 


 
  
  
  	 
	2
	

	 


 
  
  
  	 
	3
	

	 


 
  
  
  	 
	4
	

	 


 
  
  
  	 
	5
	

	 


 
  
  
  	 
	6
	

	 


 
  
  
  	 
	7
	

	 


 
  
  
  	 
	8
	

	 


 
  
  
  	 
	9
	

	 


 
  
  
  	 
	10
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

EyeCare  Centers  of  America,  Inc.
Ratio  of  Earnings  to  Fixed  Charges
Exhibit  12.1


<S>                                  <C>                                      <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
                                                                              1/3/1998  1/2/1999   1/1/2000   12/30/00   12/29/01
                                                                              --------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Net earnings (loss)                                                              5,215   (26,273)    (5,257)   (15,534)    (9,072)
Add: Income tax provision                                                          335        13        384        766      1,239
                                                                              --------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                                 5,550   (26,260)    (4,873)   (14,768)    (7,833)

Fixed Charges:
               Interest expense, net                                            14,380    23,804     25,091     28,964     27,537
               Interest factor portion of rent expense                           6,254     6,888      8,466      9,923     10,229
                                                                              --------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                     Total fixed charges                        20,634    30,692     33,557     38,887     37,766

Earnings (loss) before income taxes and fixed charges                           26,184     4,432     28,684     24,119     29,933

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                1.27      0.14       0.85       0.62       0.79
</TABLE>
#### In re ESTATE of Jose Antonio LOPEZ-SERRANO, Deceased. Milagros del Prado LOPEZ-SERRANO, Appellant, v. Joaquina Escapa LOPEZ-SERRANO and Eusebio Lopez, Appellees.

No. 73-1035.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DIEDRICH
COFFEE, INC. UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THIRTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED AND
AS OF MARCH 8, 2000 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S 3RD QUARTER 2000 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FIANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-08-2000
<CASH>                                       4,068,678
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,247,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,712,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,988,016
<PP&E>                                      31,944,878
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,378,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,756,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,820,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       126,168
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,756,040
<SALES>                                     52,150,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,150,784
<CGS>                                       25,487,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,487,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,628,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             892,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                306,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            289,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   289,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>