alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



Dated:
November 8, 2002

| |  | /s/PHILIP G. HIRSCHPhilip G. Hirsch Chief Executive
Officer                                       
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/MATTHEW C. MCGUINNESSMatthew C. McGuinness Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer

---

QuickLinks
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44570

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

IVAN DEAN SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 436

Filed: April 18, 2017

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Valley County. Hon. Jason D. Scott, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years, for aggravated assault, affirmed. 

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Ivan Dean Smith pled guilty to aggravated assault. I.C. §§ 18-901 and 18-905(b). In 

exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge that he was a persistent violator was dismissed. 

The district court sentenced Smith to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of 

confinement of two years. Smith appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Smith’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit
10.12


 


THIRD
AMENDMENT TO

PROMISSORY NOTE


 


THIS
THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE, entered into on October 6, 2022 (this “Amendment”), is made to the
Promissory Note dated April 16, 2020 (as previously amended as of March 11, 2021 and October 8, 2021, the “Original Note”),
executed by ONS Acquisition Corp., a Cayman Islands exempted company (“Maker”), as maker thereof, payable to
the order of ONS Acquisition Management LLC (“Payee”).


 


Recitals.
Payee, as the current legal and equitable owner and holder, and the payee, of the Original Note, and Maker desire to amend the Original
Note to extend the maturity date of the Note to December 31, 2022.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants and agreements herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Maker and Payee agree as follows:


 


SECTION
1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings and uses assigned in the Original
Note; and the term “Note” when used in this Amendment means the Original Note, as amended hereby.


 


SECTION
2. Amendment. The date “September 30, 2020” in sections 1 and 3 of the Original Note which was
previously amended to be “September 20, 2022” is hereby further amended and restated to read “December 31, 2022.”


 


SECTION
3. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the law of
the State of New York.


 


SECTION
4. Confirmation. Except as expressly set forth herein, the Original Note is ratified and confirmed in all respects
and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


 


SECTION
5. Successors and Assigns. This Amendment is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of Maker and Payee and their
respective successors and assigns permitted by the Note, except Maker may not assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations
hereunder other than as provided in the Note.


 


SECTION
6. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and by each party hereto on separate
counterparts, each of which counterpart when so executed shall be an original, but all such counterparts taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. A counterpart signature page delivered by fax or internet transmission shall be as effective as delivery
of an originally executed counterpart.


 


[Remainder
of Page Left Intentionally Blank]


 






     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Third Amendment to be duly executed and delivered by their respective proper and duly authorized
officers on, and effective as of, the first date set forth above.


 


 


	 	MAKER:
	 	 
	 	ONS ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Alexander Crutchfield
	 	Name: 	Alexander Crutchfield
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	PAYEE:
	 	 
	 	ONS ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Frank Bachinsky
	 	Name:	Frank Bachinsky
	 	Title:	Manager



  


Signature
Page to Third Amendment to

Promissory Note


 


 


2
VI 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1492 

For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself and Mr. SCHATZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai 

Chaowasaree). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai 

7 Chaowasaree) shall be held and considered to have been 

8 lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent resi9 dence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon 

10 payment of the required visa fees. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1492 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Vichai 

3 Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree), as provided 

4 in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

5 officer to reduce by the appropriate number during the 

6 current fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas 

7 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

8 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                              (Shares in Thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Six Months Ended
                                                                               June 30,
                                                                      -------------------------
                                                                          1999          1998
                                                                      -----------   -----------
<S>                                                                   <C>           <C>
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding ...............       248,883       247,637

Dilutive weighted average shares issuable on exercise of stock
     options less shares repurchasable from proceeds ..............           162           551
                                                                      -----------   -----------

Diluted weighted average number of common and common
     equivalent shares ............................................       249,045       248,188
                                                                      ===========   ===========


Income (loss) from continuing operations (millions) ...............   $      57.6   $      (9.1)
Income from discontinued operations (millions) ....................         133.2          23.0
                                                                      -----------   -----------
Net income (millions) .............................................   $     190.8   $      13.9
                                                                      ===========   ===========


Per share - basic and diluted
Income (loss) from continuing operations ..........................   $      0.23   $     (0.03)
Income from discontinued operations ...............................          0.54          0.09
                                                                      -----------   -----------
Net income ........................................................   $      0.77   $      0.06
                                                                      ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
Table 6.  Homeownership Rates by Area:  First Quarter 1995 and 1994   
                                                                
                                                               
 Area                                                         
                                        First       First     Standard    Standard   
                                      quarter     quarter     error on    error on  
                                        1995        1994     1995 rate  difference 
                                                                     
 United States......................    64.2        63.8         0.2         0.2
                                                                                
   Inside MAs.......................    62.1          NA         0.2          NA
     In central cities..............    49.3          NA         0.3          NA
     Not in central cities (suburbs)    70.2          NA         0.2          NA
   Outside MAs......................    72.3          NA         0.4          NA
                                                                               
  Northeast.........................    61.9        61.7         0.4         0.6
  Midwest...........................    67.9        66.8         0.3         0.5
  South.............................    66.1        65.6         0.3         0.4
  West..............................    58.9        59.5         0.4         0.5
                                                                               
 NA Not available, see page 2 of the press release for explanation.             

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                            COMPUTRON SOFTWARE, INC.
 
             STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                   MARCH 31,
                                                              -------------------
                                                               1995        1996
                                                              -------     -------
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>
Net income (loss)...........................................  $ 1,438     $(8,071)
                                                              =======     =======
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
  outstanding:
  Shares outstanding at the beginning of the period.........   17,829      20,744
  Weighted average shares issued during the period..........       --          23
  Weighted average common stock equivalents.................    1,001          --
  Weighted average treasury shares acquired using the
     treasury stock method..................................     (393)         --
                                                              -------     -------
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
  outstanding:..............................................   18,437      20,767
                                                              =======     =======
Net income (loss) per common and common equivalent share....  $  0.08(1)  $ (0.39)
                                                              =======     =======
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
(1) All share information contained in the per share calculation has been
    adjusted to reflect the conversion of all series of Redeemable Convertible
    Preferred Stock and Class A and Class B Common Stock into Common Stock as of
    the original issuance dates. These equities were converted into Common Stock
    upon the closing of the initial public offering on August 29, 1995.
 
                                       24
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1538 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1538

  To enhance consumer rights relating to consumer report disputes by 
      requiring provision of documentation provided by consumers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2013

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Begich, and Mr. Nelson) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To enhance consumer rights relating to consumer report disputes by 
      requiring provision of documentation provided by consumers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FIX Credit Reporting Errors Act'', 
or the ``FIX Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED BY CONSUMERS.

    Section 611 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681i) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``, 
                        including documentation provided by the 
                        consumer,'' after ``relevant information''; and
                            (ii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``, 
                        including documentation provided by the 
                        consumer,'' after ``relevant information''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (4), by inserting ``, including 
                documentation,'' after ``relevant information''; and
            (2) in subsection (f)(2)(B)(ii), by inserting ``, including 
        documentation,'' after ``relevant information''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                          GREAT PLAINS SOFTWARE, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA NET INCOME PER SHARE (1)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Primary EPS                Fully Diluted EPS
                                                  Year ended May 31,            Year ended May 31,
                                                  1997           1996           1997           1996 
<S>                                           <C>             <C>           <C>             <C>
Weighted average common shares
 outstanding                                    7,629,460      7,352,820      7,629,460      7,352,820

Common Stock equivalents:
 Assumed conversion of mandatorily
  redeemable preferred stock                    1,847,627      1,847,627      1,847,627      1,847,627
 Stock option (2)                                 526,262        564,477        541,016        591,078

Pro forma weighted average common 
 and common equivalent shares
 outstanding                                   10,003,349      9,764,924     10,018,103      9,791,525

Net income                                    $ 3,644,000     $7,461,000    $ 3,644,000     $7,461,000

Unaudited pro forma net income per share      $      0.36     $     0.76    $      0.36     $     0.76

</TABLE>

(1) Unaudited pro forma net income per share is based on the unaudited pro 
    forma weighted average number of shares of common stock and common 
    equivalent shares outstanding for the period.  The unaudited pro forma 
    weighted average number of shares assumes the conversion of the Company's 
    Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series B Mandatorily 
    Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,847,627 shares of common 
    stock effective June 1, 1995.  Because of the significant impact of the 
    assumed conversion on the Company's capital structure and earnings per 
    share, historical earnings per share have been excluded from the 
    financial statements as they are not considered meaningful.

(2) Effect of applying the treasury stock method to weighted average stock 
    option outstanding during the period.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           9,486
<SECURITIES>                                    15,329
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (501)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,956
<PP&E>                                          11,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,348
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,550
<SALES>                                         46,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,096
<CGS>                                           10,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,418
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,023
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,395
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,395
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
#### Henry Newton WRIGHT, Jr. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 62513.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Henry Newton Wright, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Calcasieu. 357 So.2d 1213.

Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners XIV 1998 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759859
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS XIV
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      382
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          26,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,250)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         30,285
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,571)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,696
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,267
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,936
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   179.02<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant had an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>