alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# (1)

AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVE

CIVIL AVI ATION AUTHORIT Y

CZECH RE PUBLIC

A i rp or t Ru zy ne, 160 0 8 Pr agu e 6

tel: 4 2 0 -2 -3 332 092 2, f a x : 420 -2 -20 562 270 

### Number: CAA-AD-T-1 12/1999R1

Supersedes CAA-AD-T-112/1999

Date of issue: Novem b e r23, 1999

LET, a

. s., Kunov i ce

AEROTE CH NIK CZ s.r. o., Kun o vice

L 13, L 13A, L 13AC, L 13S W

, L 13SE, ++



## SAILPLANE - TAIL-FUSELAG E ATTACHMENT FITTING -

INSPECTION/REPLACEMENT

Applicability : Sailp lan e L 1 3 , all m o d e ls and serial nu m b ers, ce rtificated in any categ or y

. P o we re d sai l pl ane

L 13 SW Vi v a t, L 13 SL Vi v a t an d L 13 SEH Viv a t, all m odels and se ria l num bers, cert i ficated in a n y category.

Reas on : To prev en t d e stru cti o n of tail-fu sel a g e attach m e n t fittin g wh ich can lead to l o ss o f con t ro l of t h e

sai l p l a ne. Thi s dest r u ct i o n c o u l d be cau sed d u e t o l o wer st r e ngt h of t h e m a t e ri al use d du ri n g pr od uct i o n.

Effecti v e d a te : Upon recei pt.

C o mp lia n c e : Action m u st be done prior to furt her flight in accorda n ce with LE T, a

. s. , M a ndat o ry B u lletin No.

L13/085a date d Novem b er 17, 1999 which becom e s here w ith part of thi s AD a n d m a y be obtaine d from : LET,

a.s., 6 8 6 04 K u no vi ce 11 7 7 , C ZEC H R E PUB L IC or i n acc or dance wi t h A E R O TEC H N I K C Z s.r

. o

. M a nd at ory

Bu lletin No

. SW 1 3 -0 48 a, SEH 1 3

- 005 a, SL 13 -00 4 a d a ted No v e m b er 18 , 19 99 , wh ich beco m e s h e r e w i th p a r t o f

t h i s A D a n d m a y be obt ai n e d fr om : AER O T E C H N I K C Z s

. r. o.

, 68 6 0 4 K u n o v i ce, C Z E C H R E P U B L I C

.

Re m a r k s: - W h er e ap p licab le, th e r e qu ir em en ts o f th is AD m u st b e in tegrated in to th e Air c r a f t Log book ( s )

. - Ad dress inqu iries co n c ern i n g th is AD to : Civ il Av iation Au t h ority, Airworth i n ess Divisio n

, R u zyn e A i rpo r t, 160 0 8 Pr ag u e 6, Czech R e p u b lic, tel: 420 2 3 332 092 2, f a x : 42 0 2 2056 227 0.



### Ing. Pavel MATOUŠEK

Director of Airw orthiness Division

CAA CZ

CA A- AD -T-11 2 / 1 999 R1

1/ 1
#### Harry Vernon CHRISTNER, Petitioner, v. Philip Leonidas CUMMINS et al., Respondents.

No. 43940.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 278 So.2d 349.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the Annual Report of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Dana C. Russell, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * *



|                                                  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Dana C. Russell                               |  | 
|Dana C. Russell                                   |  | 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                  | 
|Date: December 23, 2008                           |  |
No. 72-6102.

#### McCullough et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6570

THEODORE J. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MACK JARVIS; DANIEL L. STIENEKE; HATTIE

PIMPONG; LINWOOD E. STANCILL; JOHN TAYLOR;

HUGH MARTIN; CARL BATTLE; ZEB HEATH; HAROLD

SMALLS; JOHN MILLS; ROOSEVELT STRICKLAND; JIM

BEANE; DONALD PEACH; CAROL WHITAKER; PHIL

HOLHOUSER; FRED B. MURCHISON; WILLIAM

SOUTHERN; DAVID BOBO; MITCH JOHNSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-25-5-BO)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 23, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Theodore J. Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Williams v. Jarvis, No. CA-99-25-5-BO

(E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,596,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  497,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,525
<INVENTORY>                                    377,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,501,484
<PP&E>                                      32,639,599
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,360,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,458,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,611,362
<BONDS>                                      5,815,274
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    28,385,234
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,299,369)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,458,066
<SALES>                                     14,811,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,811,756
<CGS>                                        4,378,917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,378,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,657,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                606,684
<INCOME-TAX>                                   200,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            406,484
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   406,484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
#### Emilio C. GUERRA et al., Appellants, v. MUTUAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, J. C. Hollis and Nettie Hollis, Appellees.

No. I-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 17, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 6, 1967.

Cecil Jackson, Pensacola, for appellants.

Paul L. Cummings, Pensacola, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding have appealed- a post-decretal order denying their petition to set aside the sale of the property involved herein which was held pursuant to the mandate of the final decree.

The sole ground assigned in support of appellants’ petition is the inadequacy of the purchase price paid for the property by the successful bidder at'the sale. The'chancellor found from the evidence adduced .at the hearing on appellants’ petition that the value of the property was approximately twice the amount paid for it at.the foreclosure sale. No irregularities in connection with the conduct of the sale were either alleged or proved. The petition and proof are silent with respect to any other special grounds which’ might' justify rescission such as collusion, accident, mutual mistake, breach of trust, fraud, or misconduct upon the part of the purchaser or other party connected with the sale. The property sold for an amount sufficient to satisfy the monetary requirements of the final decree, so no question of a deficiency decree is involved. Under the circumstances reflected by this record we are of the view that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in holding that mere inadequacy of purchase price was not *16sufficient to justify rescission of the foreclosure sale.1 The order appealed is accordingly affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON, and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

1

. Maule Industries, Inc. v. Seminole Rock and Sand Company, (FIa.1956) 91 So.2d 307; Ruff v. Guaranty Title & Trust Co., 99 Fla. 197, 126 So. 383.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

[DESCRIPTION]    EXHIBIT 27  Financial Data Schedule
       
<CAPTION>

<S>                                 <C>                       
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<CASH>                               1,964,251                              
<SECURITIES>                           589,498
<RECEIVABLES>                        1,298,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                          5,584,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     9,917,047
<PP&E>                               3,124,238
<DEPRECIATION>                       1,574,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      11,807,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                2,751,398
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<COMMON>                                 6,636
<OTHER-SE>                           8,896,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        11,807,407
<SALES>                             12,221,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    12,221,364
<CGS>                                6,727,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        9,138,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       (45,517)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (3,599,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (3,599,414)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                        (3,599,414)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.57)
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                   DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                        SEP-30-1997
[PERIOD-TYPE]                             9-MOS
<EXHIBIT 27>  Financial Data Schedule - Cont.
<EPS-BASIC>                              (0.29)
[EPS-DILUTED]                            (0.29)
Laural yn("Laura") J. Remo

DOT Office of Aviation Analy sis Air Carrier Fitness Div i sion, X

- 56 1200 New Jers e y Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C.20590 United States of America

Re:I sland Air Express as US Mail Carrier

Dear Ms Remo,

My name is Van Ververs and I am the Terminal Manager for Northland Services here on Prince of Wales Island. We are a marine transportation company providing weekl y barge service to the island. I have worked in this industry for over15 y ears. Prior to my involvement in ma rine transportation I worked as a freight manager for a Ketchikan based air service. I believe m y past and current work experience provides me with unique insight into the transport of goods in Southeast Alaska. I have watched the development of Island Air Express and I can appreciate their growth and subsequent success through hard work and a solid plan. I am also a resident of the island, and I don't believe that it is much of a reach to say that I sland Air Express has changed the paradigm, in a positive way , for air travel to and from Prince of Wales I sland. In conclusion, I can see no reason what so ever wh y Island Air Express should not be found fit to

carr y the US mail.

Thank y ou for y our time,

Van Ververs Craig , Alaska
Annual Visitation Estimate

Visit Type Visits (1,000s) 90% Confidence Level (%)#

Total Estimated Site Visits* 136,733 ±3.7

→ Day Use Developed Site Visits 54,724 ±5.3

→ Overnight Use Developed Site Visits 11,970 ±5.4

→ General Forest Area Visits 63,960 ±6.4

→ Designated Wilderness Visits† 6,079 ±8.1

Total Estimated National Forest Visits§ 103,511 ±4.1

→ Special Events and Organized Camp Use‡ 696 ±0.0

Selected Regions:

Northern Region (R1) (FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012)

Rocky Mountain Region (R2) (FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012)

Southwest Region (R3) (FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012)

Intermountain Region (R4) (FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012)

Pacific Southwest Region (R5) (FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012)

Pacific Northwest Region (R6) (FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012)

Southern Region (R8) (FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012)

Eastern Region (R9) (FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012)

Alaska Region (R10) (FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012)

Round 3

* A Site Visit is the entry of one person onto a National Forest site or area to participate in recreation activities for 

an unspecified period of time. 

† Designated Wilderness visits are included in the Site Visits estimate.

‡ Special events and organizational camp use are not included in the Site Visit estimate, only in the National Forest 

Visits estimate. Forests reported the total number of participants and observers so this number is not estimated; it 

is treated as 100% accurate.

§ A National Forest Visit is defined as the entry of one person upon a national forest to participate in recreation 

activities for an unspecified period of time. A National Forest Visit can be composed of multiple Site Visits.

# This value defines the upper and lower bounds of the visitation estimate at the 90% confidence level, for example if 

the visitation estimate is 100 +/-5%, one would say “at the 90% confidence level visitation is between 95 and 105 

visits.”

12/16/2014 1
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smith Micro Software, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: August 5, 2010
    /s/ Andrew C. SchmidtAndrew C. SchmidtVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 4.7

 


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED VIACOMCBS
BONUS DEFERRAL PLAN- 


PART A (2021 RESTATEMENT) &


PART B (2021 RESTATEMENT)


 


 


Effective as of February 16, 2022, the ViacomCBS Bonus
Deferral Plan (each of Part A and Part B) is amended such that, for all periods on or after February 16, 2022, all references to “ViacomCBS”
or “ViacomCBS Inc.” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount Global”, including such that: all references to the
“ViacomCBS Administrative Committee” or “ViacomCBS Investments Committee” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount
Global Administrative Committee” and “Paramount Global Investments Committee”, respectively; all references to “ViacomCBS
401(k) Plan” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount Global 401(k) Plan”; and reference to “ViacomCBS Inc.”
in the definition of “Company” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount Global”.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to a resolution of the
Paramount Global Administrative Committee, the undersigned hereby executes this amendment this 7th day of October, 2022.


 


 


 


	 	 
	 	By:	 	
    /s/ Mark Beatty

	 	 	 	Name: Mark Beatty
	 	 	 	
    Its: Member, Paramount Global


    Administrative Committee
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of THE SAINT  JAMES  COMPANY  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Bruce  Cosgrove,  President & CEO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Bruce Cosgrove
                                         ---------------
                                             Bruce Cosgrove, President & CEO

Dated:  February 6, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


_________________________________________________________________________________________


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | This Amendment No.1 on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in this Amendment No.1 on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: March 1, 2018











/s/ John F. WoodsJohn F. WoodsChief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
#### Willie J. SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-252.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 28, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Deanne C. HYDE, Clara Deal, and Roger Lee Hall, Appellees.

No. 71-757.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 21, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### MISS. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Cecil Mangrum, Mayor of Town of Ethel, Miss. v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 44745.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 12, 1968.

Alton Massey, Kosciusko, Bennett E. Smith, Jackson, for appellant.

Wise, Carter & Child, Jackson, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.