alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  1965 to 2005



   Year     First    Second     Third     Fourth

           Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter



2005���.        69.1

2004���.        68.6      69.2      69.0      69.2

2003���.        68.0      68.0      68.4      68.6

2002\r��..      67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3

2002���.        67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3

2001���.        67.5      67.7      68.1      68.0

2000���.        67.1      67.2      67.7      67.5



1999���.        66.7      66.6      67.0      66.9

1998���.        65.9      66.0      66.8      66.4

1997���.        65.4      65.7      66.0      65.7

1996���.        65.1      65.4      65.6      65.4

1995���.        64.2      64.7      65.0      65.1

1994���.        63.8      63.8      64.1      64.2

1993\r��..      63.7      63.9      64.2      64.2

1993���.        64.2      64.4      64.7      64.6

1992���.        64.0      63.9      64.3      64.4

1991���.        63.9      63.9      64.2      64.2

1990���.        64.0      63.7      64.0      64.1

1989\r��..      63.9      63.8      64.1      63.8



1989���.        63.9      63.9      64.0      63.8

1988���.        63.7      63.7      64.0      63.8

1987���.        63.8      63.8      64.2      64.1

1986���.        63.6      63.8      63.8      63.9

1985���.        64.1      64.1      63.9      63.5

1984���.        64.6      64.6      64.6      64.1

1983...��.      64.7      64.7      64.8      64.4

1982���.        64.8      64.9      64.9      64.5

1981���.        65.6      65.3      65.6      65.2

1980���.        65.5      65.5      65.8      65.5

1979\r���.      64.8      64.9      65.8      65.4



1979���.        65.3      65.1      66.0      65.8

1978���.        64.8      64.4      65.2      65.4

1977���.        64.8      64.5      65.0      64.9

1976���.        64.6      64.6      64.9      64.8

1975���.        64.4      64.9      64.6      64.5

1974���.        64.8      64.8      64.6      64.4

1973���.        64.9      64.4      64.4      64.4

1972���.        64.3      64.5      64.3      64.4

1971���.        64.0      64.1      64.4      64.5

1970���.        64.3      64.0      64.4      64.0

1969���.        64.1      64.4      64.4      64.4

1968���.        63.6      64.1      64.1      63.6

1967���.        63.3      63.9      63.8      63.5

1966���.        63.5      63.2      63.3      63.8

1965���.        62.9      62.9      62.9      63.4

\r Revised.
### Fw: Response to OMB Comments on CO NAAQS Rosalina Rodriguez to: Sherry Russell 08/11/2011 10:39 AM

----- Forwarded by Rosalina Rodriguez/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/11/2011 10:39 AM -----

From: Rosalina Rodriguez/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine

_ J.

_ Kymn@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lewis Weinstock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Somers/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, David Orlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, James Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Lamason/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Sherry Russell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 08/04/2011 04:38 PM Subject: Response to OMB Comments on CO NAAQS 

### Hi, Christine: Attached is a file with our response to the 2 comments we received with respect to monitoring under the CO NAAQS, currently under OMB review (with court ordered deadline for signature of August 12). Specifically, the two comments we addressed are: (1) rationale for the 1 million population threshold, and (2) consideration of comments regarding safety concerns for near-road monitors. Please let us know if you have further comments. Thank you. Rosalina M. Rodriguez Associate Division Director, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, USEPA 919-541-5298

Response to OMB 8-4-11 V3.docx
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1272 

To provide that certain requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act do not apply if the American Health Benefit Exchanges are 

not operating on October 1, 2013. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2013 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. COATS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide that certain requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act do not apply if the American Health Benefit Exchanges are not operating on 

October 1, 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exchange Sunset Act 

5 of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1272 IS

1 SEC. 2. NONAPPLICATION OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION 

2 AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. 

3 (a) TERMINATION OF EXCHANGE REQUIREMENT.— 

4 Section 1311 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

5 Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18031) is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following: 

7 ‘‘(l) FAILURE TO OFFER COVERAGE.—If one or more 

8 Exchanges fails to accept applications for enrollment in 

9 qualified health plans beginning on October 1, 2013, the 

10 requirements of this section shall cease to apply, and any 

11 other provisions of this Act (or an amendment made by 

12 this Act) relating to Exchanges shall not be applicable.’’. 

13 (b) REQUIREMENT OF COVERAGE.—Section 5000A 

14 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by add15 ing at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(h) TERMINATION.—The provisions of this section 

17 shall terminate on October 1, 2013, if the Secretary of 

18 the Treasury determines that one or more Exchanges fails 

19 to accept applications for enrollment in qualified health 

20 plans on such date.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1567 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2013 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. CARPER, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KAINE, Mr. 

LEAHY, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. UDALL of 

New Mexico, and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ret5 roactive Pay Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED FEDERAL EM7 PLOYEES. 

8 Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

9 in appropriations which begins on or about October 1, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1567 IS

1 2013, shall be compensated at their standard rate of com2 pensation, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, 

3 as soon as practicable after such lapse in appropriations 

4 ends. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### William CAMPBELL v. DIAMOND M. DRILLING CO. et al.

No. 53508.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1973.

In re: William Campbell applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Cameron. 274 So.2d 842.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Cox Communications, Inc. ("Cox") Nos. 333-03766, 333-65102, 333-65102-01 on Form
S-3 and Nos. 33-80993, 33-80995, 33-91506, 333-85055, 333-43738, 333-109440, and
333-104179 on Form S-8 (collectively referred to as the "Registration
Statements"), of our report dated February 27, 2004, (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
adoption, effective January 1, 2002, of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 142 and the adoption, effective January 1, 2001, of SFAS
No. 133, as amended), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cox for the
year ended December 31, 2003, and to the references to us under the heading
"Experts" in the Prospectuses, which are part of such Registration Statements.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 27, 2004
#### Dorothy M. MISTURA a/k/a Dorothy M. Mayhew, wife, Appellant, v. Stanley MISTURA a/k/a Stanley Mayhew, husband, Appellee.

No. 72-238.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 12496-002]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380, the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 12496-002), to be located on the upper South Fork Battle Creek in Tehama County, California, and has prepared a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project. The project would occupy no federal land or Indian reservations.

The final EIS contains staff's evaluations of the applicant's proposal and the alternatives for licensing the proposed Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project. The final EIS documents the views of governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, affected Indian tribes, the public, the license applicant, and Commission staff.

                    A copy of the final EIS is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Branch, Room 2A, located at 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. The final EIS also may be viewed on the Commission's website at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     under the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     (866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-8659 (TTY).                

                    You may also register online at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​esubscription.asp*                     to be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.                

                    For further information, contact Kenneth Hogan at (202) 502-8434 or at                     *Kenneth.Hogan@ferc.gov.*

      ( print page 37491)    
Dated: July 25, 2018.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-16397 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00 12 4

- CR

SEUNG

- YOUNG KIM APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered A Appellant’s Withdrawal Of Notice Of Appeal

. @ The

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

T ex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 27 , 2011
Table 10.  Percent Distribution by Type of Unit for the United States and 
            for Inside and Outside MAs:  Third Quarter 1995 and 1994     
                                                                        
 (Percent distribution may not add to total, due to rounding)          
                                                                      
                                                                     
                                            Third quarter 1995       Third quarter 1994
                       
                      
                                          United Inside Outside     United Inside Outside
                                          States    MAs     MAs     States    MAs     MAs
                                                                                             
All housing units.......................     100    100     100        100     NA     NA
                                                                                          
  Year-round vacant.....................     8.5    8.0    10.2        8.3     NA     NA
    For rent............................     2.6    2.8     2.0        2.5     NA     NA
    For sale only.......................     0.9    0.8     1.0        0.8     NA     NA
    Rented or sold, awaiting occupancy..     0.8    0.8     0.9        0.8     NA     NA
    Held off market.....................     4.2    3.6     6.4        4.2     NA     NA
      For occasional use................     1.4    1.1     2.7        1.5     NA     NA
      Temporarily occupied by persons                                                   
      with usual residence elsewhere....     0.6    0.6     0.7        0.8     NA     NA
      For other reasons.................     2.1    1.9     3.0        2.0     NA     NA

  Seasonal vacant.......................     2.8    1.6     6.9        2.8     NA     NA

  Occupied..............................    88.8   90.4    82.9       88.9     NA     NA
                                                                                           

 NA Not available.                            
                                             
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS I, Joseph C. Tusa, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMSYS IT
Partners, Inc. (the registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: November 10, 2004
    /s/ Joseph C. Tusa, Jr.Joseph C. Tusa, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 30
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeff Hawn, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Novell, Inc;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|Date: August 23, 2011                 
|                                      
|/s/ Jeff Hawn                         
|Jeff Hawn                             
|Chief Executive Officer, President and
|Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SYNTELLECT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF 
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF SYNTELLECT, 
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,236
<SECURITIES>                                     8,298
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                       932
<INVENTORY>                                      2,973
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,672
<PP&E>                                           5,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           137
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,133
<SALES>                                         22,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,953
<CGS>                                           13,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   597
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,618)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,618)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.19)
        

</TABLE>