alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bo . a
un ‘ @ VS DEPANTMENT OF COMMERCE—HUREAU OF THE CENSUS anm...4¢ eon 42-5 Sak
seate LT ett Incorporates piace Ascites tlisat an Ward o ory Jt Unincorporated piace asian ae eres SIXTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1940
: Township on other Bh. TF, y; Keumernied by me oe ye | eB
County 64 thc mtte dvimon of county [Deeee. g pe __ Bioch Nes. ewe si —— is POPULATION SCHEDULE OL 5 ry Liss

,
GLa telbsea cit ta dter, __. Erumeratet

BOvaEBOLD DATA sane pascairrios E PERSONS 14 TEARS OLD AxD OVER EMFLOTMERT sTaTeR

ScorraTiek OEDERTYT. ABD (Lats OF WOREES

i
i

me) ea
aad

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Tatlend,

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

a 2 fo Wl |! gdh Ino Seatin| I |Ciasaalas yl 2 OF 201M (24) Mo OT-
LYE tu) jez tin Iriel 2 Sashal ___} HOW lo Plo ra tra
lm bile BRS y a =

\b

ads, Coun eel
sal ever e
Atte 2 |b
Lanna. 2

E

i

EFEEEFEFEF
E
me | Te di}

RB ERIS

EEFEEE

=F

was

jt Pelt hy
By

FP

=

Pere esses

{'|! 1 |i

=

2

Mfantnscae

Baa

SUPPLEMENTARY
QUESTIONS

Pus Permaas Exnioareied on Lines 6) ant 6

wal eorotn, SOSH Ano Gam oF ove
aerate htt nt]
Sas ee ee
amowa a - me
ES ae een te nk wat
-_

maa

Scorasen ai
3) tte
r

8) a tee meres

drgphith Vow taco} | , he [Prapaac $e
itl sue anal __Lthahee aca Waasamand EL: Ei Li-t1,_é ~ oe
¢ M

Sy
fel

8

Ga A TAREE OF BORE ORE A A RET Mod oF meaOOL ComurTED

M
i

iy
i

l
i

Oe ea ree. BSA CKES
A OF

y
Hi
I
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 8 5 0

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T u e s d a y

, J u l y 2 8

, 2 0 1 5 1 0 : 1 7 A M

T o : r y a n j c a t h e y @ g m a i l

. c o m

D e a r M r

. C a t h e y :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

‐ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 8 5 0 )

.

T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 9 6 7 7

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
Order entered May 3, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01088-CV

VIVIAN O. TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

CHARLES E. TAYLOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-21619

ORDER

The reporter’ record is past due. By post card notice dated April 14, 2021, 

we instructed Francheska Duffey, Official Court Reporter for the 330th Judicial 

District Court, to file the reporter’s record within thirty days. Before the Court is 

appellant’s April 30, 2021 letter informing the Court that Ms. Duffey will not file 

the reporter’s record without payment. Appellant filed a Statement of Inability to 

Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond in the trial court on December 

15, 2020. Because nothing in the record reflects appellant has been ordered to pay 
costs, appellant is allowed to proceed without payment of costs. See TEX. R. CIV.

P. 145(a). Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Duffey to file the reporter’s record on or 

before June 2, 2021.

On the Court’s own motion, we DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send 

appellant a paper copy of the (1) corrected clerk’s record filed on January 4, 2021, 

(2) supplemental clerk’s record filed on December 22, 2020, and (3) reporter’s 

record when it is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Duffey and all parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
** EXHIBIT 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, David G. Zahka, Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., have reviewed Talk America Holdings, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 and, based on the inquiries I have made or caused  to  be  made  in  the  fulfillment  of  my responsibilities as the Chief Financial Officer of  Talk  America  Holdings,  Inc.,  I  hereby certify that:

 

(i) the Talk America Holdings, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii)  the  information  contained  in  such  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America  Holdings, Inc.

 

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Talk America Holdings, Inc.

 

/s/ David G. Zahka

David G. Zahka

Chief Financial Officer

November 9, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAEMAR POWELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 398 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1481 

To require issuers of long term care insurance to establish third-party review 

processes for disputed claims. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require issuers of long term care insurance to establish 

third-party review processes for disputed claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long Term Care In5 surance Integrity Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LONG TERM CARE INSURANCE DISPUTE RESOLU7 TION REVIEW PROCESS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, an insurance issuer that offers a long term 

10 care insurance plan shall develop and implement claims 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1481 IS

1 dispute resolution procedures that comply with the re2 quirements of this section that shall be applicable to such 

3 plan. 

4 (b) REQUIREMENT.—A claims dispute resolution pro5 cedure under subsection (a) shall— 

6 (1) be designed to expeditiously resolve disputes 

7 concerning claims under the plan involved; 

8 (2) with respect to such disputes, provide for 

9 the application of one or more alternative means of 

10 dispute resolution involving independent third-party 

11 review under appropriate circumstances by entities 

12 that are mutually acceptable to the issuer and the 

13 enrollee involved, with the decision of such reviewer 

14 being binding on the issuer; and 

15 (3) ensure that an enrollee is eligible to obtain 

16 claims review only to the extent and in the manner 

17 provided for in the applicable insurance contract. 

18 (c) APPEALS.—An enrollee may appeal the decision 

19 of an independent reviewer under subsection (b)(2) to an 

20 appropriate State court as provided for under State law. 

21 (d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec22 tion shall be construed to provide authority for an inde23 pendent third-party reviewer under subsection (b)(2) to 

24 modify the terms of any long term care insurance contract. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### PEERLESS INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, a public corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-759.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 20, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1544 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 

provisions of the Heartland, Habitat, Harvest, and Horticulture Act 

of 2008 relating to timber, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent certain provisions of the Heartland, Habitat, 

Harvest, and Horticulture Act of 2008 relating to timber, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Timber Revitalization 

5 and Economic Enhancement Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF TIMBER GAINS. 

7 (a) SPECIAL RATE MADE PERMANENT.—Paragraph 

8 (1) of section 1201(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1544 IS

1 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘ending after the date’’ and 

2 all that follows through ‘‘after such date’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘beginning after the date of the enactment of the Timber 

4 Revitalization and Economic Enhancement Act of 2013’’. 

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF SPECIAL RATE.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 

7 1201(b)(1)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘15 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘20 percent’’. 

9 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 55(b) 

10 of such Code is amended by striking paragraph (4). 

11 (c) COMPUTATION FOR TAXABLE YEARS IN WHICH

12 RATE FIRST APPLIES.—Paragraph (3) of section 1201(b) 

13 of such Code is amended to read as follows: 

14 ‘‘(3) COMPUTATION FOR TAXABLE YEARS IN

15 WHICH RATE FIRST APPLIES.—In the case of any 

16 taxable year which includes the date of the enact17 ment of the Timber Revitalization and Economic 

18 Enhancement Act of 2013, the qualified timber gain 

19 for such year shall not exceed the qualified timber 

20 gain properly taken into account for the portion of 

21 the year after such date.’’. 

22 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MARCUS B. HARRIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4364 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 2, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. Marcus B. Harris, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, LUCAS and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jacqueline HUGHES, Respondent.

No. 68-99.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 2, 1968.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty. and Joseph Durant, Asst. State Atty., for petitioner.

Mosca & Barone, Miami, for respondent.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By notice of appeal, the State attempts to review an interlocutory order in a criminal matter pursuant to § 924.-071(1), Fla.Stat., 1967, F.S.A.1

The order in question purports to relate to the suppression of an admission by the defendant. If in fact there was an admission, it was not to the crime charged and, therefore, we find the order to be not appealable. Under such circumstances, the State urges us to consider and review the order by considering its notice of appeal as a petition for common *66law certiorari [see: State v. Coyle, Fla. App.1966, 181 So.2d 671], which we have done.

Examining the transcript to determine if the trial court has departed from the essential requirements of the law in entering the order here under review, we fail to find that he has and decline to exercise our discretion in entertaining the petition. See: Brinson v. Tharin, 99 Fla. 696, 127 So. 313; Gay v. City of Gainesville, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 41.

Petition for certiorari denied.

1

. For future guidance of counsel, we point out that appeals pursuant to this statute are of an interlocutory nature, and should be governed by provisions of the Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., relating to such.
CODE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR FINANCIAL MANAGERS

In  my  role  as  a  finance  manager  of  Eye  Care  Centers  of America, Inc.,

I  recognize  that  financial  managers  hold  an important and elevated role in
corporate  governance.  I  am  uniquely  capable  and  empowered  to ensure that
stakeholders'  interests  are  appropriately  balanced, protected and preserved.
Accordingly,  this  Code  provides  principles  to  which financial managers are
expected  to  adhere  and advocate. The Code embodies rules regarding individual
and  peer  responsibilities,  as  well  as  responsibilities to the company, the
public  and  other  stakeholders.

I  certify  to  you  that  I adhere to and advocate the following principles and
responsibilities  governing  my  professional  and  ethical  conduct.

To  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  ability:

1.     I  act  with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts
of  interest  in  personal  and  professional  relationships.

2.     I  provide  constituents  with  information  that  is accurate, complete,
objective,  relevant,  timely  and  understandable.

3.     I  comply  with  rules  and regulations of federal, state, provincial and
local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.

4.     I  act  in  good  faith,  responsibly,  with  due  care,  competence  and
diligence,  without  misrepresenting  material  facts or allowing my independent
judgment  to  be  subordinated.

5.     I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of my
work  except  when  authorized  or  otherwise  legally  obligated  to  disclose.
Confidential  information  acquired  in  the  course  of my work is not used for
personal  advantage.

6.     I  share  knowledge  and  maintain  skills  important  and relevant to my
constituents'  needs.

7.     I  proactively  promote  ethical  behavior as a responsible partner among
peers  in  my  work  environment  and  community.

8.     I  achieve  responsible  use of and control over all assets and resources
employed  or  entrusted  to  me.



____________________________________________
Name:
Title:
#### Kermit MARCUS, Appellant, v. Edward Z. COONIN and Rose Coonin, his wife, Appellees.

No. 66-973.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 17, 1967.

Gilbert A. Frank, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Larkin & Decker and David Lewis, Jacksonville, Leonard E. Abel, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

*13PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Franklin Acceptance Corp. v. Superior Elec. Industries, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 116.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1505 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1505

 To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to clarify the jurisdiction 
of the Environmental Protection Agency with respect to certain sporting 
  good articles, and to exempt those articles from a definition under 
                               that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2013

  Mr. Thune (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to clarify the jurisdiction 
of the Environmental Protection Agency with respect to certain sporting 
  good articles, and to exempt those articles from a definition under 
                               that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hunting, Fishing, and Recreational 
Shooting Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION.

    Section 3(2)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 
2602(2)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (v), by striking ``, and'' and inserting ``, 
        or any component of any such article including, without 
        limitation, shot, bullets and other projectiles, propellants, 
        and primers,'';
            (2) in clause (vi) by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``, and''; and
            (3) by inserting after clause (vi) the following:
            ``(vii) any sport fishing equipment (as such term is 
        defined in section 4162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986) the sale of which is subject to the tax imposed by 
        section 4161(a) of such Code (determined without regard to any 
        exemptions from such tax provided by section 4162 or 4221 or 
        any other provision of such Code), and sport fishing equipment 
        components.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### KECK v. SCHUMACHER.

No. 36517.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 198 So.2d 39.
Ss

~“aQaeevorneee sane eet @ ea SRR ERERRERERARRRRB!

The
ii
te ) ey)
33 -; =| F
338 Z
merece | |_| Sei So OE
wena | SINT SIAAE TS ~~} $+} “
o ome unm | =] | |
pF || } |
a: |
ge.
ags
Ss 3 | S$ na) \\ ) &
@8 = | ‘
ty : ‘al IN ye ‘ak as \N
= |
A) .

SO

rWaee a

ue o
e
Estate.

-,

eens 70 el
SE eereans
noy-dujaag

>
2
> ©
a 2
@ 6 =
D = °
f] 3 of 3 2
, ‘| # se 8¢
J sEa 85
— i} HolelS) |Ne<s §e SES Te
< > Q
3 PL Evm £2 ‘ Sh
be 3 5 | £82 o0
| 3° | S = © 5S =~ @
\ a i Fa 2 es i
_ IN if.) 38) | 88° Ss tS
\ 3 ra |< nn 2 | a
aft \ g2>5 ae |
: O' 2 y| O N ve
o e3 OOo S a} 2 JN Bs
Gg a Oo: > so =
—— n =< 2| i= @ :
S|) | Bex ek: HP LN zs
‘ory AA Vy) A =i , ‘
s €5 gS As
Sea SS ESS INES RESISES NESESESINE SIs Rater Bs ERD SSS OO
Ay ge g%8 TTL : TAN TIT SI 4 ,
3 wot de g5 :
: ~ aro = y° -
i t "a £2
| = a > | “ : . a
ba \ rss Sy |
7 E: \ 1 5.33 . | «| A “hi - 8
pb ri YN od NG r * a A iu
a : |
5 : i Jak NSS are ,

Page No. 2/7

of 2
Post Office

steer ea aan aT
poroquinu sory

JiISss ii} td

5 Sag & F RR FS

ain

\.

J
#### RETZKY v. J. A. CANTOR ASSOCIATES, INC.

No. 35993.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 192 So.2d 24.
CRASS TL Se ae etre eae ho Besah sg Scteinn raster oad Waskonas ertton’” Boar Genoes Noprwts Woes a Went les Berges Sf Yammnens depckaea e fosemipee

oy - wt af a - , DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 8.D. No WUT E.D. No Rf =f A
tare i Adenied 2 = Aud tncorpacted pce Ppaah— for hic ada ara DE aa ste alg” mmpoy la mr orceryr ee grenyey fenders er SIXTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1940

Towushig or. other ; f Boumernted by me on Daal 2. Sage j ,

County ig eckreee paee ae es POPULATION SCHEDULE

om
7 tocaTios | SOCSEWOLD Data NAME EDUCATION PLACE OF BILTit 4 RESIDENCE, APRIL 1, 1935 PERSONS 14 YEARS OLD AND OVER—EMPLOYMEXT STATUS

6m Tb THE PERAON LIVE OM APRIE 1, 10017 | Bo |
1e

ss ech ase ee hy

Same of each persen whote usual
1, Tine

* ri of reentonce am April t, 1040.
j 4 ry thee hw meh

#8 Sees To Iertene

‘i bears i the UY citend Mate. OCCUPATION, INDOETED. aBD Clam OF WORT:
a the th
aire Mabe, oe

AT baretem kere, give ras
we

‘ete shaued an betessy
4 om,

| Poewas wemperarila shemet tram bensshelt
Rime Ab ofan somes of oie pores

e Daud “4 all Distinguied male

sctteeties starts Sey
ae
ys C.F 4

ee ee

— Yok. Lb S zi
; nongto nf
ee ae 23

W ihe
wt
wif |
wibl
MST
Wedel
| WN

7A)
GAY,
fee/
ROL Sp aye | ah yes
YO)
+ 737) V
173 ])\ Wa 10 20-10
YS) ya | tf
457 ne | atid PS
Thi
(Kil
Bil
holo

pm semi (bad bed hastened

SALLE jecud
a Oh Wife
PM! Mong. (hiner fel

> nent Wd eh

m3 3

3

hh

Pegs. Sosdbnche W. | Mant bm) ul lator
- DPretutrr wegas_\/ F| At) on
‘Jeon [Diane ght Ap) vat

Wagner, grs—h R fhe awel\ bm) w ST on)

ELC ELE

ee. B- Weft VA 37 et Dias ee eet phew | Pe URE i 4
pepe. thal. *}. Weaed mm USO WK he % Mok Pll rye] Nee 2 pol

— here 8. | Weft |!) FW 9 oe q 12> Vt . p
Wilkinger. Leo miskect) Mead | wl age.
hanes ple Weft |!) F wal
—Pisemanrag Aun A fo Lact Jan. 1d 152 w
- “moan 2 wfe VE) Wigai ny

1B Cernnans Lawton YO to IC

———- Morrern~ Ff Ug
= Ste abies Re ato
11 FA og thot. & ieod
Sa BSS Sy pees Ce 2 =. Wal

MWtstakhail o

ti el) ® Rl RR] Gale! E|

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

| eh. Lonel
ot fn wcto~ |

atlo~te.. |

SUPPLEMENTARY
QUESTIONS

for Parnana Enumerated om Lines 47 054 27° worn at seman or = ae sd ser ry nae Scena Sroqeipimm tenon ngpepenr te
ses like i Sh eee ee
if st Fl ha? csi

5 i ni
as

5 a | ew fa

ape eget PT pelt arm mm TL

/ Ont it, ASD AT LAST RERTHDAT, nesnachara alo anne Ae Reale ere ae oe
Elemo mary a ta 1A ete te Seana po ar

¢ ted

igh chek, Lat Mh pear... HEL, HA, 4, A a i we

Reenter — Caltage, Lat be Ath poor O04 04,04 ‘per tha =
(Cs mt inca eee, Rh oF wee UAE TORE cnsneesceee OB ad tre ome toe

POR PERSONS 14 YEARS OLD AND OVER

Aanquegy sxeting jp home bw