alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1577 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the definitions provided 

for points and fees in connection with a mortgage transaction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2013 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. 

TOOMEY, and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the 

definitions provided for points and fees in connection 

with a mortgage transaction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Choice Act 

5 of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF POINTS AND FEES. 

7 (a) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 103 OF TILA.—Sec8 tion 103(bb)(4) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 1602(bb)(4)) is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1577 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)(A) and section 129C’’; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

4 (A) by inserting ‘‘and insurance’’ after 

5 ‘‘taxes’’; 

6 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘, except as 

7 retained by a creditor or its affiliate as a result 

8 of their participation in an affiliated business 

9 arrangement (as defined in section 2(7) of the 

10 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 

11 (12 U.S.C. 2602(7))’’ after ‘‘compensation’’; 

12 and 

13 (C) by striking clause (iii) and inserting 

14 the following: 

15 ‘‘(iii) the charge is— 

16 ‘‘(I) a bona fide third-party 

17 charge not retained by the mortgage 

18 originator, creditor, or an affiliate of 

19 the creditor or mortgage originator; or 

20 ‘‘(II) a charge set forth in section 

21 106(e)(1);’’; and 

22 (3) in subparagraph (D)— 

23 (A) by striking ‘‘accident,’’; and 

24 (B) by striking ‘‘or any payments’’ and in25 serting ‘‘and any payments’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1577 IS

1 (b) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 129C OF TILA.—Sec2 tion 129C of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639c) 

3 is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

5 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi6 nator’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’; and 

7 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(C)(i), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

8 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi9 nator)’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’. 

10 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

11 Not later than the end of the 90-day period beginning 

12 on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Bureau of 

13 Consumer Financial Protection shall issue final regula14 tions to carry out the amendments made by this Act, and 

15 such regulations shall be effective upon issuance. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1999
<CASH>                                      22,548,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,676,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                   469,435
<INVENTORY>                                  1,237,449
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,262,111
<PP&E>                                     228,279,919
<DEPRECIATION>                              72,949,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             209,247,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      240,668,923
<BONDS>                                      1,492,295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       27,079,520
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,128
<OTHER-SE>                                (60,033,744)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               209,247,122
<SALES>                                     13,239,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           113,783,400
<CGS>                                        5,967,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               96,133,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,171
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               343,314
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,249,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,015,239)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,015,239)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,015,239)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 1 1

- 00 173

- CR

MARK EDMONDSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

----------

On May 6, 2011, Appellant Mark Edmondson, proceeding pro se, filed a

notice of appeal, attempting to appeal from a March 31, 2011 order denying his

request for appointment of counsel to assist him in filing a motion for forensic

DNA testing of evidence. Edm ondson’s notice of appeal was one day late, and

he filed a motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal concurrently with

his notice of appeal.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

On April 28, 2011, unbeknownst to Edmondson, the trial court had granted

Edmondson’s motion to vac ate and set aside the order denying his request for

appointment of counsel, and the trial court appointed John Stickels as counsel for

Edmondson.

Edmondson has now filed a letter, asking that his notice of appeal “be

disregarded and/or dismissed.” We co nstrue Edmondson’s letter as a motion to

dismiss the appeal. The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of

appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having

been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER , JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )

DELIVERED: June 16, 2011
# A

http://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/files/annual17/ann17def.pdf
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 23, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40724

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS BARDALES STRURBER,

also known as Juan Carlos Figueroa-Landeros,

also known as Jose Luis Bardales Streber, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-01-CR-636-1

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis Bardales Strurber appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Strurber argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony”

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional.

Strurber acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), but
No. 02-40724

-2-

asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi

v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve

his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

 The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549

                                   FORM 10-QSB\A


         ( X ) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                For the quarterly period ended December 31, 1996

          ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                        For the transition period from      to

                      Commission File Number: 0-26676

                     MULTIMEDIA CONCEPTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Delaware                                  13-3835325
(State or other jurisdiction of           (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

                    448 West 16th Street, New York, NY 10011
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (212) 675-6666
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

              (Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
                         if changed since last report)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No

                      APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

     State the number of shares  outstanding of each of the issuer's  classes of
common equity, as of the latest practicable date:

     Common Stock, $.001 par value.  3,005,000 shares outstanding as of December
31, 1996
<PAGE>
 PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION


Item  1.      Legal Proceedings

There are no material legal  proceedings  against the Company or in which any of
their property is subject.


Item  2.      Changes in Securities

              None


Item  3.      Defaults upon Senior Securities

              None


Item  4.      Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

              None


Item  5.      Other Information

              None


Item  6.      Exhibits and Reports:

              (a) Exhibits

     See Notes to  Financial  Statements,  Note 5 regarding  computation  of per
share earnings

     27 - Financial Data Schedule

              (b) Reports on Form 8-K

                   None

<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES


In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  Report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.





Date: April 1, 1997                  MULTIMEDIA CONCEPTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.




                                                              By: /s/ Ilan Arbel
                                                           Ilan Arbel, President



                                         <PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1





Certification


of


PSB Holdings, Inc.


under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  May 16, 2011





PETER W. KNITTPeter W. KnittPresident and CEOSCOTT M. CATTANACHScott M. CattanachTreasurer(Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coates International, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Form
10-QSB"), I, George J. Coates, President and Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, the Company's Form
10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Security Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November  22, 2004               By: /s/ George J. Coates
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            George J. Coates
                                            President and Chief Executive
                                            Officer

                                       15
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Robert R. Galvin,  Chief  Financial  Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003
of the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                               /s/ Robert R. Galvin
                                               --------------------
                                               Robert R. Galvin
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               February 13, 2004
```
#### William Earl STAFFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-617.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1512 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST THEODORE MATTHEW GLENDE 

4 POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Roch7 ester, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1512 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Theodore 

5 Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           11885909
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     35438
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 11921347
<CASH>                                         702769
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             28462
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         474667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14101575
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                2166347
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            32433
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 4106107
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          248424
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       466239
<OTHER-SE>                                     6666124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14101575
<PREMIUMS>                                     7245660
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            863940
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             96863
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 0
<BENEFITS>                                     5211737
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    39894
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           1197658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (939972)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (939972)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 552235
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             4206402
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               618572
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                816500
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        66337





</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 12


                      Williams Holdings of Delaware, Inc.
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (Dollars in millions)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Six months ended
                                                                   June 30, 1997
                                                                  ----------------

<S>                                                                  <C>
Earnings:
   Income before income taxes                                        $   180.8
   Add:
      Interest expense - net                                              27.5
      Rental expense representative of interest factor                     4.0
      Other                                                                (.6)
                                                                     ---------

         Total earnings as adjusted plus fixed charges               $   211.7
                                                                     =========

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense - net                                            $    27.5
   Capitalized interest                                                    4.1
   Rental expense representative of interest factor                        4.0
                                                                     ---------

         Total fixed charges                                         $    35.6
                                                                     =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                        5.95
                                                                     =========

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41745

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERTO CARDOZA-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-616 

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Alberto Cardoza-Rodriguez (Cardoza) appeals his guilty plea

conviction and 46-month sentence for illegally reentering the

United States after having been previously deported. 

Cardoza challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b). Cardoza’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Cardoza contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule
No. 05-41745

-2-

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the

basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States

v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126

S. Ct. 298 (2005). Cardoza properly concedes that his argument

is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review.

Cardoza argues that the district court erred by ordering him

to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of

supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct

appeal. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100,

1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006)

(No. 05-8662). The claim is dismissed. See id. at 1102. 

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

               AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


August 11, 1999

Union Pacific Resources Group Inc.
777 Main Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102

We are aware that Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. has incorporated by
reference in its Registration Statements No. 333-62181 on Form S-3 and No.
333-22613 and No. 333-35641 on Form S-8, its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1999, which includes our report dated July 27, 1999 covering the
unaudited interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to
Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part
of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report
prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Act.

Very truly yours,



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Fort Worth, Texas