alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
 
 I, David
G. Zahka, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Talk America Holdings,
Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)  [omitted
pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)]
 
 c)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 April 26,
2005
 
 /s/
David G. Zahka
 David G.
Zahka
 Chief
Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Iridium
LLC's financial statements for the year ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000948421
<NAME> IRIDIUM LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          33,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,620
<PP&E>                                       3,718,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                 345,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,528,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          621,394
<BONDS>                                      1,701,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     42,853
<COMMON>                                     2,030,741
<OTHER-SE>                                   (877,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,528,563
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               357,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (448,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (448,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (448,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.81)
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00701-CV

Terry Christopher Bounds, Appellant

v.

David Fernea; Bounds and Pinto Marketing, Inc.; and Austrends, Inc., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-07-003874, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed an agreed joint motion advising this Court that they have

reached a full and final settlement agreement and requesting that we vacate the district court’s

judgment, dismiss the case in its entirety, order that each party bear its own costs of appeal, and

orderthat this Court’s mandate issue immediately. We grant the motion, reinstate the appeal, vacate

the district court’s judgment, and dismiss the case. See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c), 42.1(a)(2)(A),

43.2(e), 43.6.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Goodwin

Vacated and Cause Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: May 2, 2014
Exhibit 10.23.1 - Form of Amendment to 1995 Stock Option Plan

                        FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                      CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
                      1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN


         Pursuant to  Section  8(e) of the  Congoleum Corporation 
1995 Stock  Option  Plan  (the "Plan"), the Board of Directors of 
Congoleum   Corporation   and  the   stockholders  of   Congoleum 
Corporation  have approved an amendment to Section 5 of the Plan, 
effective  as of May 12, 1997, so that such Section shall read in 
full as follows:

          5.   Stock Subject to the Plan.

            The maximum  number of  shares of  Stock reserved for 
            the grant  of Awards under the  Plan shall be 800,000 
            shares of  Stock,  subject to  adjustment as provided 
            herein.  Such  shares  may, in  whole  or in part, be 
            authorized but  unissued  shares or shares that shall 
            have been or may be reacquired by  the Company in the 
            open  market, in  private  transactions or otherwise.  
            Notwithstanding  the  foregoing,  grants  of  Options 
            under  the Plan to any individual shall be limited to
            Options to  purchase  no more  than 200,000 shares of 
            Stock per calendar year.  If any shares subject to an 
            Award   are   forfeited,   canceled,   exchanged   or  
            surrendered  or if an  Award  otherwise terminates or 
            expires  without  a  distribution  of  shares  to the 
            Grantee, the  shares  of  Stock with  respect to such 
            Award  shall, to  the  extent of any such forfeiture,
            cancellation,  exchange,  surrender,  termination  or
            expiration, again be  available  for Awards under the 
            Plan.
       
            In the  event that the Committee shall determine that 
            any  dividend  or  other distribution (whether in the 
            form  of  cash, Stock, or other property), recapital-
            ization, stock  split, reverse split, reorganization, 
            merger,  consolidation,  spin-off,  combination, rep-
            urchase, or share exchange,or other similar corporate 
            transaction or event, affects the Stock such  that an 
            adjustment  is   appropriate   in  order  to  prevent 
            dilution or  enlargement of the  rights  of  Grantees 
            under  the  Plan, then  the Committee shall make such 
            equitable   changes  or   adjustments   as  it  deems 
            necessary  or  appropriate  to  any or all of (i) the 
            number  and  kind  of   shares  of  Stock  which  may 
            thereafter be issued in  connection with Awards, (ii) 
            the  number  and kind of  shares  of  Stock issued or 
            issuable in respect of outstanding Awards, and  (iii) 
            the exercise price,  grant  price, or  purchase price 
            relating to  any  Award; provided  that, with respect
            to ISOs, such  adjustment shall be made in accordance 
            with Section 424(h) of the Code.

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, William J. Gervais, Chief Executive Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(1) the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: October 28, 2011




/s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAISWilliam J. Gervais,

Principal Executive Officer
Table 20.  Homeownership Rates by Race and Ethnicity of Householder


                                       1994 Standard     1995 Standard     1996 Standard     1997 Standard     1998 Standard
                                              error             error             error             error             error

U.S. total.................            64.0      0.1     64.7      0.1     65.4      0.1     65.7      0.1     66.3      0.1

  White, total.............            67.7      0.1     68.7      0.1     69.1      0.1     69.3      0.1     70.0      0.1
    White, nonhispanic.....            70.0      0.1     70.9      0.1     71.7      0.1     72.0      0.1     72.6      0.1
  Black, total.............            42.3      0.3     42.7      0.3     44.1      0.3     44.8      0.3     45.6      0.3
  Other race, total/1......            47.7      0.5     47.2      0.5     51.0      0.6     52.5      0.6     53.0      0.6
    American Indian, Aleut, Eskimo..   51.7      1.3     55.8      1.4     51.6      1.3     51.7      1.2     54.3      1.2
    Asian or Pacific Islander...       51.3      0.7     50.8      0.7     50.8      0.7     52.8      0.6     52.6      0.6
    Other................              36.1      1.1     37.4      0.9       NA       NA       NA       NA       NA       NA


  Hispanic.................            41.2      0.4     42.1      0.4     42.8      0.4     43.3      0.4     44.7      0.4
  Non-Hispanic.............            65.9      0.1     66.7      0.1     67.4      0.1     67.8      0.1     68.3      0.1


                                       1999 Standard
                                              error

U.S. total.................            66.8      0.1

  White, total.............            70.5      0.1
    White, nonhispanic.....            73.2      0.1
  Black, total.............            46.3      0.3
  Other race, total/1......            53.7      0.5
    American Indian, Aleut, Eskimo..   56.1      1.2
    Asian or Pacific Islander...       53.1      0.6
    Other................                NA       NA


  Hispanic.................            45.5      0.4
  Non-Hispanic.............            68.9      0.1


/1 Beginning in 1996, those answering 'other' for race were allocated to one of the 4 race categories--
White, Black, American Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo (one category), or Asian or Pacific Islander.
NA - Not Applicable.
#### Rogers BROWN, Petitioner, v. SOUTHERN CHEMICALS, INC., and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 42440.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 7, 1973.

Charles C. Hurt, Winter Park, for petitioner.

E. J. Gierach, of Gierach &' Ewald, Orlando, and Kenneth H. Hart, Jr., Tallahassee, for respondents.

CARLTON, Chief Justice:

This case is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to the Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, to review the Commission’s reversal of a compensation award.

*530Petitioner sustained compensable injuries in January and May of 1970. His original claim, however, alleged that the injuries occurred in February and March of that year. At the final hearing on the claim, the Judge of Industrial Claims allowed the dates alleged to be amended. Subsequently, he awarded petitioner permanent partial disability and other benefits.

The Industrial Relations Commission reversed the award on the ground that the employer/carrier “did not receive adequate notice of the amended claim to allow proper preparation of a defense against it.” The Commission also held that the record did not support any acquiescence to the amendment by the employer/carrier. We cannot agree with these conclusions.

The record demonstrates that the employer/carrier knew of only two accidents suffered by petitioner and were aware of the correct dates. It is also obvious from the record that petitioner could not remember the exact dates, that his counsel had attempted to get copies of reports reflecting the correct dates but was unable to do so, and that these dates were not ascertained until, at the hearing, the reports were produced by the employer/carrier. Under these circumstances, it is unquestionable that the employer/carrier did have notice of the actual claim against them.

Even if notice were nor so apparent, we would find that respondents acquiesced to the amendment. When the Judge allowed the dates to be amended, he also proposed a continuance. Counsel for respondents replied:

> “If Your Honor please, if the Judge would allow an amendment of the claim instanter to reflect the proper dates of accident, then I would see no reason to continue that as if the case were not dismissed on the basis of improper action. Uh, then I would have no objection to proceeding because the evidence will be the same.”

If allowing the amendment presented a new and different claim which the employer/carrier were unprepared to defend against, as they now contend it did, they were offered additional time to prepare and they refused it. The compensation award, therefore, should not have been reversed on this basis under these circumstances.

This cause is remanded to the Industrial Relations Commission with directions to enter a new order consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### James Albert MACK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-445.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 17, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 14, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 14, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15A0351. THOMAS A. ORIANS v. JASON CHIAN et al..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications:**

 

**CERTIFICATION:**

 

I,Eddie Canterbury, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/Aof Logan County BancShares, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a.               Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthis registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a.               All significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting; and

 
| Date:  November 24, 2004 |
|------------------------------------|
|                               | /s/ Eddie Canterbury |   |
|                               | Eddie Canterbury |
|                               | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### MONTGOMERY WARD & CO. v. HAYES.

No. 35646.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IRIDIUM
WORLD COMMUNICATIONS LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001035442
<NAME> IRIDIUM WORLD COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       489,421
<OTHER-SE>                                   (186,872)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   302,549
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (60,399)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,399)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,399)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>