alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
891 A.2d 336

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Stephen F. MARSALEK, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 78,

Sept. Term, 2005.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Feb. 3, 2006.

*ORDER*

The Court having considered the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Stephen F. Marsalek, to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of (30) days, it is this 3rd day of February, 2006

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be and it is hereby granted and the Respondent, Stephen F. Marsalek, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of thirty (30) days; and it is further

ORDERED, that said suspension shall commence on he date of this Order, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Stephen F. Marsalek from the register of attorneys, and shall certify that to the Trustees of the Client Protection *739Fund of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.
Exhibit 10.1

             Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated By-laws of
                          Giga Information Group, Inc.


           By resolution of the Board of Directors of Giga Information Group,
Inc, (the "Company") on June 4, 2001, the following amendment to Article 1 of
the Company's Amended and Restated By-laws has been adopted:

           The following has been added to the end of the third sentence of the
first paragraph of Section 1.10 after the word "stockholders," effective only
with respect to Annual Meetings of stockholders held after the 2001 Annual
Meeting:

           "; provided further that if during the prior year the corporation did
           not hold an annual meeting or if the date of the annual meeting is
           more than 30 days earlier than the annual meeting in the prior year,
           then notice must have been received by the Secretary at least 30 days
           prior to the mailing of notice for the next annual meeting."

           The following has been added to the end of the fifth sentence of the
first paragraph of Section 1.11 after the word "stockholders," effective only
with respect to Annual Meetings of stockholders held after the 2001 Annual
Meeting:

           "; provided further that if during the prior year the corporation did
           not hold an annual meeting or if the date of the annual meeting is
           more than 30 days earlier than the annual meeting in the prior year,
           then notice must have been received by the Secretary at least 30 days
           prior to the mailing of notice for the next annual meeting."
#### AUTO CARBURETOR & SEE-MOR CLUTCH CO., Appellants, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH MIAMI, Appellee.

No. 70-141.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jerome THAMES.

No. 53486.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1973.

In re: Jerome Thames applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.

Writ denied. Application premature— defendant has adequate remedy if convicted.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00461-CR

Style: State of Texas.

v Isaias Santos III

Date motion filed*: December 20, 2013

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: September 16, 2013

Number of previous extensions 

granted:

 

2 Current due date: December 11, 2013

Date requested: December 31, 2013

The motion to extend time to file a brief is DENIED. Appellant’s brief was originally due on 

September 16, 2013. On September 25, 2013, this Court notified appellant that appellant’s brief had not 

been filed and required a response within 10 days. On October 3, 2013, counsel requested an extension 

of time because he had “various trial settings at [that] time.” We granted the motion and appellant’s 

brief was due on October 28, 2013. On November 20, 2013, this Court notified appellant that 

appellant’s brief had not been filed and required a response within 10 days. On November 26, 2013, 

counsel requested a second extension without an explanation of why additional time was necessary. We 

granted the motion with an admonition that no further extensions would be granted and appellant’s brief 

was due on December 11, 2013.

In the current motion to extend time, filed on December 20, 2013, counsel again provides no 

explanation for his requested extension. Accordingly, we deny the motion because counsel has not 

established extraordinary circumstances for a further extension.

If appellant’s brief is not filed within 10 days of the date of this order, then the case will be 

abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

38(b).

Judge's signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: December 31, 2013
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Apolinar Marquez Camposano v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00041-CR

Trial court case number: 08-05-04380-CR

Trial court: 284th District Court of Montgomery County

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw on June 10, 2015, 

and amended brief on June 17, 2015, concluding that the above-referenced appeal is 

frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). On 

July 3, 2015, appellant, acting pro se, filed the form motion requesting access to a copy 

of the record to prepare a response and requesting a 30-day extension of time to file his 

pro se Anders brief response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2014).

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s pro se motion requesting the record and order

the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to provide a copy of 

the clerk’s and reporter’s records, and any supplemental records, to the pro se appellant. 

The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this 

order, the date upon which delivery of the record to the appellant is made.

Finally, we grant appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a pro se

Anders response. Appellant’s pro se response to his counsel’s Anders brief shall be filed

within 45 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually 

Date: July 9, 2015
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. 

### 2023 KW 0747
CALVIN BERNARD JEFFERSON 

### SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

In Re: Calvin Bernard Jefferson, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

## Tammany, No. 

### 521289.
BEFORE: GUIDRY, 

### C.J., CHUTZAND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. No appeal 

### lies from a 

### judgment 

## denying an application 

### for postconviction relief. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 

### 930.6 (A) . If relator elects to seek review of the 

### denial of his application 

### for postconviction relief, 

### he may do so 

## by 

## invoking the 

### supervisory jurisdiction of the court of appeal 

## withoutthenecessityofobtaining a return date. Should relator wish to 

### file an application with this court, 

### he must 

### include with the application a 

### copy of the application 

### for postconviction relief, the state's answer ( 

## ifany), the district court' s 

### ruling, 

### the bill of 

### information, the uniform commitment order, pertinent 

### district court minutes, and 

### any other portion of the 

### district court record that might support 

### any claims 

### raised in the writ application.JMG WRC WIL



### OURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

EPUTY CLERKOF COURT 

### FORTHE COURT
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Larry Joe PHILLIPS v. John E. UNSWORTH, Jr. and Louisiana State Bar Association.

No. 61422.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Larry Joe Phillips applying for writ of mandamus and habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE WMA CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         9,559,187
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               9,559,187
<CASH>                                       1,534,632
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             299,454
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      36,513,351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,624,435
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              3,104,294
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             10,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,070,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,624,435
<PREMIUMS>                                   2,036,357
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            156,719
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                               2,621,867
<BENEFITS>                                   1,203,061
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,014,292
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           872,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,231,209
<INCOME-TAX>                                   420,401
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            810,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   810,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

			      BOSTONFED BANCORP, INC.
			      17 New England Executive Park
			      Burlington, MA   01803


				   Form 10-Q
			       September 30, 1996


Exhibit 11.  Statement re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

							  Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
							  September 30, 1996         September 30, 1996


							      (Dollars In Thousands, except
								    per share amounts)
									(Unaudited)
<S>                                                         <C>                       <C>
Net income(loss)                                            ($421)                    1,726

Weighted average common shares outstanding                   6,589,617                6,589,617

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
 effect of stock options                                     None                     None

Unallocated ESOP shares                                      (408,087)                (423,201)

Unawarded shares in the 1996 Stock-Based Incentive Plan      (21,084)                 (21,084)

Total weighted average common shares and
equivalents outstanding                                      6,160,446                6,145,332

Primary earnings per share                                   ($.07)                   $.28

Total weighted average common shares and
 equivalents outstanding                                     6,160,446                6,145,332

Additional dilutive shares using ending
 period market value versus average market
 value for the period when utilizing the
 treasury stock method regarding stock options                 N/A                      N/A 


Total shares for fully diluted earnings per share            6,160,446                6,145,332


Fully diluted earnings per share                             ($.07)                   $.28
</TABLE>
., LQOATION; NAJIE NATIVITY. C!TIZENBIDP.

. ' nr01111&' 

# .i' a



# . : · !a 

# ii

.. '.. f

...**~~**



# l

.

j !ft 

# Jf**,'of~e~nne"h"J.~gl** ln'thlafamllti.**Zntct,tllrw.:!!~:i_~t;,~·•t.i b~~d~u!!!;:t.11:,'ikJ.M** **Pla.:•ctJ~~'~:~~~~:,jf~~:i;::cu~~':,~ g.,t~~6i~UottfJ**  S**~ ·----~---~-----!**  

### g.i '

## i~ 

# ii g

## 1-----~-1 

# H 

# jj I Pla.:• et tlrth ('( FJ.UU**Pl~** ol Urth d Herran

clthilf-!nc:i or1U.r-eo-."a**l-f----1-----1----~1 l~-----t--t-1**
Exhibit 7.1

Financial ratios



|                                                     |  |      |      |  |      |  |      |      |  |  |      |  |  |      |      |  |  |  |      | 
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- | ---- |  |  | ---- |  |  | ---- | ---- |  |  |  | ---- | 
|Year ended 31 March                                  |  | 2016 |      |  | 2015 |  |      | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |     
|Return on capital employeda                          |  |      |      |  |      |  |      |      |  |  |      |  |  |      |      |  |  |  |      | 
|Adjustedb  %                                        |  |      | 13.8 |  |      |  | 25.2 |      |  |  | 22.9 |  |  |      | 22.1 |  |  |  | 20.4 | 
|Reported  %                                         |  |      | 13.0 |  |      |  | 23.6 |      |  |  | 21.1 |  |  |      | 20.6 |  |  |  | 19.3 | 
|Interest coverc                                      |  |      |      |  |      |  |      |      |  |  |      |  |  |      |      |  |  |  |      | 
|Adjustedb  times                                    |  |      | 8.2  |  |      |  | 6.7  |      |  |  | 5.8  |  |  |      | 5.1  |  |  |  | 4.5  | 
|Reported  times                                     |  |      | 5.2  |  |      |  | 4.1  |      |  |  | 3.8  |  |  |      | 3.8  |  |  |  | 3.7  | 
|Net debt to adjusted EBITDAb 
times                 |  |      | 1.5  |  |      |  | 0.8  |      |  |  | 1.1  |  |  |      | 1.3  |  |  |  | 1.5  | 
|Capital expenditurec as a percentage of
revenueb  % |  |      | 14.0 |  |      |  | 13.0 |      |  |  | 12.8 |  |  |      | 13.3 |  |  |  | 13.4 | 



|a | The ratio is based on profit before taxation and net finance expense to capital employed. Capital employed is represented by total assets less current liabilities (excluding corporation tax, current borrowings,
derivative financial liabilities and finance lease creditors) less deferred and current tax assets, retirement benefit asset, cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial assets and investments.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|b | Before specific items.
|- | ----------------------

|c | The number of times net finance expense is covered by operating profit.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
31.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George
J. Coates, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of
Coates International, Ltd., certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coates International, Ltd. (the
"Company");





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and I
have:





(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and





(c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and to
the audit committee of the Company's board of directors:





(a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and





6. I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.




Date:
      November 13, 2009
              By:
              /s/ George
      J. CoatesGeorge
      J. CoatesPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and
      Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000948547
<NAME> PHYSICIAN HEALTHCARE PLAN OF NEW JERSEY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,954,257
<SECURITIES>                                 3,938,420
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,844,280
<PP&E>                                       2,126,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                 924,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,985,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,036,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       23,744,722
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,795,419)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,985,326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,304,259
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,519,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,215,241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,215,241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,215,241)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (262)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (262)
        

</TABLE>
#### Harold E. MANNING v. WARDEN.

No. 36641.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   mar-31-1996
<CASH>                                         54,846
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    41,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               96,461
<PP&E>                                         1,628,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,766,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,822,559
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,963
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     49,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,766,826
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  376,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (460)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             21,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (397,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (397,201)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (397,201)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.07)
        


</TABLE>