Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 151 / Monday, August 6, 2018 / Notices 38325 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Revision of a currently approved 

collection. 

2. Title of the Form/Collection: The 

National Forensic Laboratory 

Information System Collection of Drug 

Analysis Data. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Medical Examiner/Coroner Office 

Survey; National Forensic Laboratory 

Information System Drug Survey of 

Drug Laboratories; and Toxicology 

Laboratory Survey for the component 

within the Department of Justice is the 

Drug Enforcement Administration, 

Diversion Control Division. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: 

Affected public (Primary): Forensic 

Science Laboratory Management. 

Abstract: The National Forensic 

Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) 

collections provide the DEA with 

national databases on analyzed drug 

samples from law enforcement 

activities, antemortem toxicology 

samples (toxiciology laboratories), and 

post-mortem toxicology samples 

(medical examiner/coroner offices 

(MECs) from federal, state, and local 

laboratories. Specifically, NFLIS-Drug 

data provide DEA current, precise, and 

representative estimates of drugs seized 

by law enforcement and analyzed by 

forensic laboratories. Since 2001, DEA 

has had case and drug report estimates 

for all drugs reported in NFLIS that are 

statistically representative of the nation 

and of census regions. The estimates, 

which are made possible by updating 

the laboratory profiles through the 

survey effort (see draft survey in 

Appendix), have given DEA the ability 

to track national and regional drug 

trends; a clearer national picture of 

illicit or diverted drug availability; 

additional information about the 

temporal changes in drug availability by 

geographic region; and the ability to 

detect new or emerging drugs. 

Information from NFLIS is combined 

with other existing databases to develop 

more accurate, up-to-date information 

on abused drugs. This database 

represents a voluntary, cooperative 

effort on the part of participating 

laboratories and MECs to provide a 

centralized source of analyzed drug 

data. Existing federal drug abuse 

databases do not provide the type, 

scope, timeliness, or quality of 

information necessary to effectively 

estimate the actual or relative abuse 

potential of drugs as required under the 

Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

811(b)) and international treaties in a 

timely and efficient manner. For 

example, much of the trafficking data 

for federal drug scheduling actions is 

presently obtained on a case-by-case 

basis from state and local laboratories. 

Occasionally scientific personnel from 

the DEA’s Diversion Control Division, 

Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, 

have contacted specific laboratories and 

requested files. In addition, some DEA 

field offices routinely subpoena MEC 

records for use in case work. The 

development of the National Forensic 

Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) 

greatly enhances the collection of such 

data. Submission of information for this 

collection is voluntary. DEA is not 

mandating this information collection. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: The DEA estimates that 140 

persons annually for this collection at 

1.6 hour per respondent, for an annual 

burden of 218 hours. 

6. An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

proposed collection: The DEA estimates 

that this collection takes 218 annual 

burden hours. 

If additional information is required 

please contact: Melody Braswell, 

Department Clearance Officer, United 

States Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, Suite 3E.405B, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: August 1, 2018. 

Melody Braswell, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16740 Filed 8–3–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1121–NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; New 

Collection: Survey of State Attorneys 

General Offices (SSAGO): Human 

Trafficking 

AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, 

Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until 

October 5, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Suzanne Strong, Statistician, 

Prosecution and Judicial Statistics Unit, 

Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh 

Street NW, Washington, DC 20531 

(email: Suzanne.M.Strong@usdoj.gov; 

telephone: 202–616–3666). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Bureau of Justice 

Statistics, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

New collection. 

(2) The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Survey of State Attorneys General 

Offices (SSAGO)—Human Trafficking. 

(3) The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

SSAGO–2. The applicable component 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
38326 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 151 / Monday, August 6, 2018 / Notices 

1Allocation of cable royalty funds to the 

Devotional Claimants category remains the subject 

of the allocation proceeding, Docket No. 14–CRB– 

0010 CD (2010–13). The schedule in the proceeding 

to determine allocation of satellite royalty funds 

among claimant categories, Docket No. 14–CRB– 

0011 SD (2010–13) is suspended pending 

completion of the cable allocation proceeding. 

within the Department of Justice is the 

Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the Office 

of Justice Programs. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Respondents will be state 

attorneys general or deputy attorneys 

within the state and territory attorneys 

general offices who work on human 

trafficking matters. Abstract: Among 

other responsibilities, the Bureau of 

Justice Statistics is charged with 

collecting data regarding the 

prosecution of crimes by state and 

federal offices. This survey will be 

directed towards state and territory 

attorneys general offices regarding their 

jurisdiction over civil and criminal 

human trafficking matters. This is BJS’s 

second survey of state attorney general 

offices, but the first survey from the 

Survey of State Attorneys General 

Offices (SSAGO) program. The survey 

collects data on the staffing of state 

attorneys general offices, including the 

total number of deputy attorneys general 

and access to support staff. The survey 

also collects information on the types 

and numbers of human trafficking 

matters referred to the state attorneys 

general offices, the sources of the 

referrals of human trafficking matters, 

the estimates of labor and sex trafficking 

cases, the types of victims in labor and 

sex trafficking cases, the types of 

offenders of labor and sex trafficking 

cases, the manner in which criminal 

and civil human trafficking cases were 

closed in court, and state attorneys 

general offices’ participation in state 

and federal human trafficking task 

forces. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: An agency-level survey will be 

sent to approximately 56 state and 

territory attorneys general offices. The 

expected burden placed on these 

respondents is about 25 minutes per 

respondent, with an additional 5 

minutes to locate any additional persons 

within the office necessary to complete 

the survey. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The total respondent burden 

is approximately 28 burden hours for 

the 56 respondents. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Melody Braswell, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405A, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: July 30, 2018. 

Melody Braswell, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16581 Filed 8–3–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Royalty Board 

[Docket 14–CRB–0010–CD/SD (2010–13)] 

Distribution of Cable Royalty Funds; 

Distribution of Satellite Royalty Funds 

AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board, 

Library of Congress. 

ACTION: Final Distribution 

Determination. 

SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges 

(Judges) announce final distribution of a 

portion of cable and satellite royalty 

funds for the years 2010, 2011, 2012, 

and 2013. The determination results 

from agreement among the participants 

that claim shares of the funds to be 

allocated to the Devotional Claimant 

category. The Judges issued their initial 

determination to the participants on 

July 19, 2018. 

DATES: Applicable: August 6, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: The final distribution order 

is also published in eCRB at https://

app.crb.gov/ and on the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at 

www.regulations.gov. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read submitted background documents, 

go to eCRB, the Copyright Royalty 

Board’s electronic filing and case 

management system, at https://

app.crb.gov/ and search for docket 

number 14–CRB–0010–CD/SD (2010– 

13). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anita Blaine, CRB Program Specialist, 

by telephone at (202) 707–7658 or email 

at crb@loc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

matter is before the Copyright Royalty 

Judges (Judges) on motion of Multigroup 

Claimants (MGC) for entry of a consent 

order adopting the distribution shares 

proposed by the Settling Devotional 

Claimants (SDC) and ordering a final 

distribution of cable and satellite 

television royalty funds to be allocated 

to the Devotional Claimants category in 

conformity with those agreed shares.1

The SDC do not oppose the final 

percentage distribution. 

The Judges find that the parties’ 

agreement regarding the final percentage 

distribution ends any remaining 

controversy with regard to the subject 

funds over which the Judges have 

jurisdiction and that neither party 

retains a significant interest related to 

this proceeding. Accordingly, good 

cause exists for entry of a final 

distribution determination relating to 

the subject funds. 

The Judges therefore order that the 

royalty shares proposed in the SDC’s 

Written Direct Statement (Dec. 29, 2017) 

are adopted, and that final distribution 

of the cable and satellite royalty funds 

allocated to the Devotional category 

shall be in accordance with the 

following relative shares. 

CABLE FUNDS ALLOCATED TO

DEVOTIONAL PROGRAMMING

Cable royalty year SDC share 

(percent) 

MGC 

share 

(percent) 

2010 ...................... 77.1 22.9 

2011 ...................... 82.6 17.4 

2012 ...................... 84.8 15.2 

2013 ...................... 89.1 10.9 

SATELLITE FUNDS ALLOCATED TO

DEVOTIONAL PROGRAMMING

Satellite royalty 

year 

SDC share 

(percent) 

MGC 

share 

(percent) 

2010 ...................... 75.3 24.7 

2011 ...................... 88.3 11.7 

2012 ...................... 90.7 9.3 

2013 ...................... 97.7 2.3 

The Judges further order that, as the 

parties have presented this as an agreed 

determination, they have waived their 

rights to seek rehearing. 

The Judges further order that this final 

distribution determination is without 

prejudice to the parties’ right to appeal 

the Judges’ interlocutory ruling in this 

consolidated proceeding with regard to 

both cable and satellite claims issues. 

Upon issuance of this final 

determination, the Register of 

Copyrights (Register) shall have 60 days 

to conduct a statutory review. The 

Librarian of Congress shall review and 

cause this final determination, and any 

correction thereto by the Register, to be 

published in the Federal Register no 

later than the conclusion of the 60-day 

review period. 

July 18, 2018. 

So ordered. 

Suzanne M. Barnett, 

Chief United States Copyright Royalty Judge. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES