alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 5.  Homeownership Rates for the United States:  1965 to 2003

   Year     First    Second     Third     Fourth
           Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter

2003���.        68.0      68.0      
2002\r��..      67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2002���.        67.8      67.6      68.0      68.3
2001���.        67.5      67.7      68.1      68.0
2000���.        67.1      67.2      67.7      67.5

1999���.        66.7      66.6      67.0      66.9
1998���.        65.9      66.0      66.8      66.4
1997���.        65.4      65.7      66.0      65.7
1996���.        65.1      65.4      65.6      65.4
1995���.        64.2      64.7      65.0      65.1
1994���.        63.8      63.8      64.1      64.2
1993\r��..      63.7      63.9      64.2      64.2
1993���.        64.2      64.4      64.7      64.6
1992���.        64.0      63.9      64.3      64.4
1991���.        63.9      63.9      64.2      64.2
1990���.        64.0      63.7      64.0      64.1
1989\r��..      63.9      63.8      64.1      63.8

1989���.        63.9      63.9      64.0      63.8
1988���.        63.7      63.7      64.0      63.8
1987���.        63.8      63.8      64.2      64.1
1986���.        63.6      63.8      63.8      63.9
1985���.        64.1      64.1      63.9      63.5
1984���.        64.6      64.6      64.6      64.1
1983...��.      64.7      64.7      64.8      64.4
1982���.        64.8      64.9      64.9      64.5
1981���.        65.6      65.3      65.6      65.2
1980���.        65.5      65.5      65.8      65.5
1979\r���.      64.8      64.9      65.8      65.4

1979���.        65.3      65.1      66.0      65.8
1978���.        64.8      64.4      65.2      65.4
1977���.        64.8      64.5      65.0      64.9
1976���.        64.6      64.6      64.9      64.8
1975���.        64.4      64.9      64.6      64.5
1974���.        64.8      64.8      64.6      64.4
1973���.        64.9      64.4      64.4      64.4
1972���.        64.3      64.5      64.3      64.4
1971���.        64.0      64.1      64.4      64.5
1970���.        64.3      64.0      64.4      64.0
1969���.        64.1      64.4      64.4      64.4
1968���.        63.6      64.1      64.1      63.6
1967���.        63.3      63.9      63.8      63.5
1966���.        63.5      63.2      63.3      63.8
1965���.        62.9      62.9      62.9      63.4
\r Revised.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                   ------------------------------------------

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Charles E. Johnson, the chief
executive officer of Transpro, Inc. (the "issuer"), does hereby certify that the
report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the "report") fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Charles E. Johnson
----------------------
Charles E. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
Transpro, Inc.
August 16, 2004

                                       23
```
#### The State vs. Sartain et al.

A scire facias upon a forfeited recognizance must show that the recognizance was entered into before a court or officer authorized to take it. *(Darby el al. vs. Stale,*21 *Ark.)*

*Appeal from Perry Circuit Court.*

Hon. John J. Clendenin, Circuit Judge.

Hollowell, Attorney General, for the State.

Mr. Justice Compton delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding by scire facias on a forfeited recognizance. The scire facias does not show that.fhe recognizance was entered into before the court in which the prosecution was had, or before any of the officers authorized by law *542to take it, which this court held in *Darby et al. vs. The State,*21 *Ark.*523, must be shown. The judgment of the court below quashing the *scire jadas*is, therefore, affirmed. Of course the State may sue out an *alias.*
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  First Quarter 1999 



                                    Rental vacancy rates


                           First        First      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           1999         1998       1999 rate   difference


United States..........         8.2          7.7          0.2          0.3

  Inside MAs...........         8.0          7.5          0.2          0.3
    In central cities..         8.4          8.0          0.3          0.4
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         7.6          7.0          0.3          0.4
  Outside MAs..........         9.0          8.8          0.5          0.7

 Northeast.............         6.5          6.3          0.4          0.6
 Midwest...............         8.4          7.7          0.4          0.6
 South.................        10.4          9.2          0.4          0.5
 West..................         6.3          7.0          0.3          0.5



                                    Homeowner vacancy rates


                           First        First      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           1999         1998       1999 rate   difference


United States..........         1.8          1.7          0.1          0.1

  Inside MAs...........         1.8          1.7          0.1          0.1
    In central cities..         2.1          1.9          0.1          0.2
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         1.6          1.6          0.1          0.1
  Outside MAs..........         2.0          1.9          0.1          0.2

 Northeast.............         1.4          1.8          0.1          0.2
 Midwest...............         1.4          1.3          0.1          0.2
 South.................         2.4          2.1          0.1          0.2
 West..................         1.8          1.5          0.1          0.2
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
85-A  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB  for
the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of Net Lease Management
85-A,  Inc.,  the  Managing General Partner of  the  Partnership,
certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                           /s/ Patrick W. Keene
                               Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                               Net Lease Management 85-A, Inc.
                               Managing General Partner
                               December 31, 2003
### Sample E **- mail**  (DOL received 4,141 identical e
- mails during the comment period)

From: ---- Sent:

____ To: EO 13126 Subject: Extend EO 13126 to chocolate and garments

Executive Order 13126 prohibits the acquisition of certain products produced by forced or indentured child labor by the federal government, but some of the goods on the list

– such as cocoa and cotton

– are procured by the US Government in much smaller quantity than products made from those components, such as chocolate bars and garments. As a result, if the US Government purchases cocoa from Cote d’Ivoire or cotton from Uzbekistan, the supplier to the US Government must “certify” that they have made a “good faith effort to determine whether forced labor was used to” produce the cocoa or co tton. However, if the cocoa is turned into chocolate bars, or if the cotton is processed into yarn, fabric, garments or even cotton seed oil before the government procures it, the prohibition does not apply. Therefore, I believe that the most effective wa y to implement the order’s intent of eradicating forced child labor from government supply chains is by listing the products the government actually purchases, such as chocolate bars and cotton garments, products containing components that may have been p roduced with forced child labor, as already identified by the US Government. In addition, I encourage the US Government to use the US Department of Agriculture Guidelines for Third - Party Monitoring and Verification when deciding whether a company has made a “good faith effort” to root out forced child labor in its supply chain.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
                             
<PERIOD-END>                                   jun-30-1996
<CASH>                                         28,809
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    83,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,467
<PP&E>                                         1,627,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,783,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,819,672
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,963
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,783,475
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               37,375
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  364,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (332,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (332,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (332,906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)
        


</TABLE>
0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020

Percent

Annual Homeowner Vacancy Rates for the United States and Regions: 1968-2022

Recession

Figure 4

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey, March 15, 2023

Recession data: National Bureau of Economic Research, <www.nber.org>

South

Midwest

United States

Northeast

West

2022
ore Agsachacile DEPARTMENT OF ODMMEROE AND LABOR-BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
counry Basket. ~ THIRTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1910—POPULATION

{wren comer ef,

sens” _ Me oF mstunon fg : Ewuuesareo By we OH 1

ee mare

t
Aoradlal 1 Z Taxctinao}
ar 77

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

EREERSS

TARR TAREE

gacca
Exhibit
10.3


 





FORM
OF AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS
FORM OF AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATEDEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), dated [●], and effective as
of [●] (the “Effective Date”) is between Progressive Care Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and its wholly owned
subsidiaries (the “Employer” or the “Company”), and [●], an individual (“Employee”).


 


R
E C I T A L S:


 


	A.	Company
    and Employee entered into that certain Employment Agreement, effective as of [●] (the “Original Agreement”).’
	 	 
	B.	Employee
    is knowledgeable with respect to the business of the Company.
	 	 
	C.	Company
    desires to continue employment to Employee and Employee desires to continue employment by Company.
	 	 
	D.	On
    [●], the Company and the Employee agreed to enter into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement.
	 	 
	E.	The
    Company and Employee wish to amend certain compensation provisions of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties agree as follows:


 


	1.	Section
    4, Compensation, is revised and amended as follows:
	 	 	 
	 	Paragraphs
    (d) and (e) are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
	 	 	 
	 	(d)	Employee
    shall be granted [●] million restricted stock units (the “RSU’s”) under and subject to all of the provisions
    of the related Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (the “Founders Award Agreement”). The restricted shares shall be vested
    immediately.


 


[the
remainder of the page has intentionally been left blank. signature page follows]


 




    	1



    	 



    

 


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	PROGRESSIVE
    CARE INC.	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
    		 	Dated:
    October [●], 2022
	 	Alan
    Jay Weisberg	 	 
	 	Chief
    Executive Officer	 	 


 


	EMPLOYEE	 	 
	 	 	 
		 	Dated:
    October [●], 2022
	[  ], an individual	 	 


 




    	2
3 | | os
SCHEDULE I.—Free Inhabitants in 4¢— ZZecA -Socae-,/_ in the County.ef ax! fate
of “o22.2-22-.7 enumerated by me, on the fe. day of _ 1850. 2Z6- Fez V Asst Marshal

Z ;

547

;

The Name of every Perscn whose usual place Profession, Occupation, or Trade

arried within the

year,

—

dumb, blind, insane,
| idiotic, pauper, or
| convict.

'

Puace or Birrs.

chool

of abode on the first day of June, 1850, was of each Male Person over 15

Naming the State, Territory,
or Country.

black, or
mulatto,

in the order of

visitation,

in this family.

|

years of age.

order of visitation,
alue of Real Estate

numbered in the
Families numbered

owned,

within the year,
who cannot read & write,

Dwelling-houses

ttended 8

ma | Aten

——

| | V
rs 4
&

a ee

jt «| «Persons over 20 y'rs of age

||.

@ | Color,

ma
ty

eh

Oe tele meme ae

|
Is |

Ny

N
iN
\

all —

, ons a ee

ont @ A wm & ®

eonerwak » W W&

ee
2

ims

S

)

SSRERERQERS

8
a

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,

not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly

available records like the one shown here.

‘i
_ -~

‘ on a

Le Fit me, pe

sae ’ .

ih ct rye ‘
Ai may ;
had
p. 1



# OAR Box 1784 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 31 ) II-C-2 Docket Number: 

# A-84-4 4

Printed 10/31/2008 8:05:39 AM Sheet 31 of 143

# c UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO NAGENC Y 

### 1 4 HQV |9 8 5

Mr

. Christi e Johnso n Pennwal tCorporatio n 3 Parkwa

y Philadelphia , Pennsylvani a 1910 2 Dea r Mr . Johnson : Thi s i s t o confir m

ou r telephon e conversatio n o n Novembe r 6 , 1985 , concernin g methyldiethanolamin e (MDEA) , a tertiar yamin e produce d b y Pennwal t Corporation
. Th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y1 s i n th e proces s o f reviewin g th e ne wsourc e performanc e standar d fo r petroleum refineries , specificall y refiner yfue l gas . Ou r researc hvi a literatur e an d contact s wit hpetroleum refinerie s indicate s tha t alkanolamin e treatin g i s th e mos t prominen t metho d o f removin g hydroge n sulfid e fro mrefiner yfue l gas . W e hav e also. , learne d tha t thre e differen t type s o f amine s ar e used : primary , secondary , and tertiary
. Fortunately , ther e i s a larg e amoun t o f publishe d informa

tio n o n bot hprimar yan d secondar yamines ; unfortunately , ther e i s ^ecy littl e publishe d informatio n o n tertiar yamines
. Therefore , 1 woul d lik e t o reques t tha t yo u send m e an yinformatio n yo u ma yhav e o n MDEA . I woul d appreciat e informatio n o n th e followin g specifi c characteristic s o f MDEA : Molecula r weigh t Basicit y(reactivity ) Capacit y(scf/gal ) Corrosivity : desig nlimitation s (%solutio nand m/m )

metallurgica l requirement s Strippin g character : CO 2 (Btu/lb ) H 2 S (Btu/lb ) Hydrocarbo nsolubilit y(relative) : amin e i n liqui d hydrocarbo n gaseou s hydrocarbo ni n amin e Solven t losse s (l bo f amine/M Msc f o f gas ) Reclaimin g (temperatur e and typ e o f reclaimer ) Reboile r Temperatur e a t IZ psi g Therma l properties : Hea t capacit ya t 180° F (Btu/lb°F ) L/ R exchange r hea t transfe r coefficien t (Btu/hr ) Therma l stabilit y Freezin g poin t (a t typica l solutio n concentrations ) Cos t (cents/lb ) Availabilit y(numbe r o f majo r supplier s i n U.S. ) Application : pressure , specification , and limi t o n capacit y Mercapta n remova l Chemica l degradation : H^ S 

### £2 ^

_____ 

### CO

S CONCURRENCE S SYMBO L SURNAM E DAT E & 

### tpr***-' 

# ^\



# w tf EPAForm 1320- 1 (;12-70 ) OFFICIA L FIL E COP Y GP O : 198 3 0 - 40J-20 1P. 3

I woul dappreciat e receivingthi s informatio na s soona s possibl e s o tha t i t ca nbe include dinth e review proces s fo r ou r forthcomin gdocument . You r assistanc e i nprovidin gthi s informatio nwil l be greatl y appreciated . I f yo uhave an y questions , pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o cal l me a t (919 ) 541-5595 . Sincerely ,
Willia m Larr yElmore , P.E

. Industria l Studie s Branc h Emissio n Standard s an d Engineerin g Divisio n
ESED/ISB/SDSyWLElmore/xhbake r11/6/8 5 x559 6 Rm.75 5 M U (MD-13) Fil e No

. H/P-^'/'/S'S

Projec tNo

. -33/0 3 retype d 11/7/8 5 ch b
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (Amounts in Millions, Except Ratios)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Six Months Ended
                                                                                  June 30,
                                                                              ----------------
                                                                               1999      1998
                                                                              ------    ------
<S>                                                                           <C>       <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes .........................................   $  0.8    $(43.7)

Add (deduct) distributions greater (less) than
     income of unconsolidated affiliates ..................................     (0.6)     (1.2)

Fixed charges from below ..................................................    118.7     114.2

Capitalized interest included in fixed charges ............................     (0.4)     (3.0)
                                                                              ------    ------

         Earnings available for fixed charges .............................   $118.5    $ 66.3
                                                                              ======    ======

Fixed charges:
     Interest expense, including amortization of debt discount/premium ....   $115.0    $107.0
     Portion of rentals representing an interest factor ...................      3.3       4.2
     Interest capitalized .................................................      0.4       3.0
                                                                              ------    ------
         Total fixed charges ..............................................   $118.7    $114.2
                                                                              ======    ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a) ....................................      1.0       0.6
                                                                              ======    ======
</TABLE>


(a) For the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, earnings are insufficient
by $0.2 million and $47.9 million, respectively, to cover fixed charges of the
Company.
EXHIBIT 32.1

AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph B. Leonard, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |     |  |                                     
|-------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|August 9, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Joseph B. Leonard               
|               |  |     |  | Joseph B. Leonard                   
|               |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Randall Greenough, Appellant

No. 06-18-00021-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 402nd District Court of 

Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 22,721-

2015). Memorandum Opinion delivered by

Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and 

Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Randall Greenough, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 13, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1474 

AN ACT 

To amend the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act 

of 2013 to repeal a special rule for the State of Alaska, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1474 ES

1 REPEAL OF SPECIAL RULE FOR STATE OF ALASKA. 

2 Section 910 of the Violence Against Women Reau3 thorization Act of 2013 (18 U.S.C. 2265 note; Public Law 

4 113–4) is repealed. 

Passed the Senate December 9, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1474 

AN ACT 

To amend the Violence Against Women Reauthorthe State of Alaska, and for other purposes. ization Act of 2013 to repeal a special rule for
#### COMMERCIAL CREDIT BUSINESS LOANS, INC., Appellant, v. JONNIE KWIK, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-947.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 11, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.