alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Matthew Rodriquez 

Secretary for 

Environmental Protection 

March 11 , 2016 

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

Regional Administrator 

Air Resources Board 

Mary D. Nichols, Chair 

1001 I Street • P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95812 • www.arb.ca.gov 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

Governor 

Enclosed are revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions 

consist of amended rules, listed in Enclosure A, from the following air pollution control and 

air quality management districts (districts). 

Butte County Air Quality Management District 

Placer County Air Pollution Control District 

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District 

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District 

Also enclosed is Air Resources Board Executive Order S-16-001 adopting the districts' 

rules as revisions to the SIP. To meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency criteria 

for determining that rule submittals are administratively and technically complete, we have 

enclosed evaluations of the effects of the rules on emissions, evaluations of the rules' 

consistency with 40 CFR 51, and other supporting documentation provided to us by the 

districts. One compact disc and one paper copy, each containing the revisions in their 

entirety, are enclosed. · 

If you have any questions, please have your staff contact Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief, 

Air Quality Planning and Science Division, at (916) 322-5350 or by email at 

Karen.Magliano@arb.ca.gov. 

Sincerelv. 

I'L .v. f£/" 

Richard W. Corey 

Executive Officer 

Enclosures 

cc: See next page. 

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. 

For a fist of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.gov. 

California Environmental Protection Agency 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

March 11 , 2016 

Page 2 

cc: Mr. James Wagoner 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

Butte County Air Quality 

Management District 

629 Entler Avenue, Suite 15 

Chico, California 95928 

Mr. Erik White 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

Placer County Air Pollution Control District 

11 0 Maple Street 

Auburn, California 95630 

Mr. Larry Green 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality 

Mana~ement District 

777 121 Street, Third Floor 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Mr. Michael Villegas 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District 

669 County Square Drive 

Ventura, California 93003 

Mr. Alan Abbs 

Executive Director 

California Air Pollution Control 

Officers Association 

1107 Ninth Street, Suite 210 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Mr. Andy Steckel, Chief 

Rulemaking Office (Air-4), Region 9 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 95105 

Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief 

Air Quality Planning and Science Division
Exhibit 23.2

         Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Accountants.





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Rare Medium Group, Inc. (formerly ICC Technologies, Inc.) (the
Company) on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-37036, 33-37037, 33-85634, 33-85636,
33-89122, 33-89124 and 333-76957) and Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File
No. 33-76107) of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph which
refers to conditions that raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern, dated March 20, 1998, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 1997 and for the years
ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, which report appears in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended December 31, 1998. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report, dated March 20, 1998, relating to
the financial statements of Engelhard/ICC as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and
for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which also appears in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended December 31, 1998.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 30, 1999
Honeywell’s Geismar Plant Personnel Monitoring Data for R-134a - SANITIZED
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Charles E. Johnson, the chief
executive officer of Transpro, Inc. (the "issuer"), does hereby certify that the
report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the "report") fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Charles E. Johnson
----------------------
Charles E. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
Transpro, Inc.
August 18, 2004

                                       23
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1495 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1495

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  issue an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2013

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  issue an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saracini Aviation Safety Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall 
issue an order that--
            (1) requires, on each commercial aircraft operating under 
        part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, the 
        installation of a barrier, other than the cockpit door, that 
        prevents access to the flight deck of an aircraft; and
            (2) requires, for an aircraft--
                    (A) that is equipped with a cockpit door, that the 
                barrier required under paragraph (1) remain locked 
                while--
                            (i) the aircraft is in flight; and
                            (ii) the cockpit door separating the flight 
                        deck and the passenger area is open; and
                    (B) that is not equipped with a cockpit door, that 
                the barrier required under paragraph (1) remain locked 
                as determined appropriate by the pilot in command.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard N. Feist
III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

March 19, 2006


/s/ Howard N. Feist III
-----------------------
Howard N. Feist III
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Guss HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1901.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Aug. 16, 1968.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 30, 1968.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James M. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Guss Hamilton, appeals a summary denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule One (now 1.850, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A.). We reverse.

Defendant’s motion alleges that he was not advised of his constitutional right to be represented by counsel. The trial court grounded its summary denial on the absence of any allegation of indigency citing King v. State, Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 440.

In so holding the trial court misapprehended the breadth of the King decision. There the court said,

> “In a right-to-counsel case, the burden rests upon the defendant in his collateral attack upon the judgment to rebut this presumption by first alleging and then proving by a preponderance of the evidence (1) that he was not represented by counsel; (2) that he was financially unable to employ counsel; and (3) that he did not competently and intelligently waive his right to counsel.” King v. State, supra at p. 444.

*27The rule set out in King is undoubtedly correct where a defendant bottoms his collateral attack on the failure of the court to appoint counsel or to inform him of his right to have counsel appointed or on the ineffectiveness of court-appointed counsel. These rights are obviously related to the insolvency of the defendant.

But here defendant was not indigent at the time of trial and the record so shows. His complaint is not that of an indigent not provided counsel but of a solvent defendant claiming not to have been informed of his right to retain private counsel. As the King case itself points out, “where an accused appears in court without a lawyer, the court should advise him of his constitutional right to the assistance of counsel and determine whether or not he is able to employ a lawyer to represent him.” King v. State, supra, at p. 443; Miranda v. State of Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694; Mason v. State, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 76. The record before the trial court in this case reveals that defendant appeared without counsel but is silent concerning whether or not he was ever informed of his right to retain counsel.

Obviously, to require that any defendant seeking post-conviction relief upon a right-to-counsel basis must first allege indigency would effectively deny the non-indigent the procedural rights granted the indigent by Criminal Procedure Rule One (now 1.850, Rules of Criminal Procedure). Equal protection of the law means equal rights for the rich as well as the poor.

Inasmuch as the motion and records do not conclusively show that defendant is entitled to no relief, the cause is reversed and remanded with directions for further proceedings in compliance with Rule 1.850, Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Coates International, Ltd. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Form
10-Q”), I, Barry C. Kaye, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 13, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Barry
      C. KayeBarry
      C. KayeTreasurer,
      Chief Financial Officer and
      Principal Financial Officer
No. 1388. SELECTED ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES-NUMBER AND PERCENT OF HOMES 

WITH APPLIANCES: 1960 TO 1978 

[As of December 31. Percentages based on total number of homes wired for electricity] 

HOMES WITH Al'PLI.A.NCES (mil.) PERCENT WITH .APPLIANCES 

ITEIYI 

1960 1965 1970 1975 1977 1978 1960 1965 1970 1975 1977 1978 

---------1------------- Number of wired homes-------- 51. 7 57.6 64.0 72.7 75.8 77.8 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 

Air-conditioners, room.--------- 7.8 13.9 26.0 38.4 41.9 43.1 15.1 24.2 40.6 52.8 55.3 55.4 

Bed coverings------------------ 12.2 20.0 31. 7 41.4 45.4 48.1 23.6 34. 7 49.5 57.0 59.9 61.8 

Blenders. ______ ------------- ___ 4.2 7.5 23.4 32.9 37.9 39.9 8.0 13.0 36.5 45.2 50.0 51.2 

Can openers .. ------------------ 2.5 14.2 29.1 39. 7 43.9 47 .3 4.8 24. 7 45.5 54.6 57.9 60.7 

Coffeemakers .• __________ ---- ___ 30.2 41.3 56.7 71.0 75.6 77.7 58.3 71. 7 88.6 97. 7 99.7 99.8 

Dish washers __________ -------- __ 3. 7 7.8 17.0 27.9 31.0 32.6 7.1 13.5 26.5 38.3 40.9 41.9 

Disposers, food waste----------- 5.4 7.8 16.3 28.2 32.4 33.4 10.5 13.6 25.5 38.8 42.8 42.9 

Dryers, clothes (incl. gas) _______ 10.1 15.2 28.6 42.0 44.9 46.9 19.6 26.4 44.6 57. 7 59.3 60.3 

Freezers, home _________________ 12.1 15. 7 20.0 31.6 33.9 34.9 23.4 27.2 31.2 43.5 44.8 44.9 

Frypans •.. --_ ------------------ 22.5 28.3 36.0 45.8 48.8 53.2 43.4 49.2 56.2 63.0 64.4 68.3 

Hotplates and buffet ranges ____ 12.5 13. l 15. 7 19.1 20.2 20.4 24.2 22. 7 24.5 26.2 26. 7 26.3 

Irons, total--------------------- 45.7 57.1 63.8 72.6 75.8 77.8 88.4 99.1 99. 7 99.9 99.9 99.9 

Steam and steam/spray ______ 30.6 43.5 56.5 70. 7 74.8 76. 7 59.2 75.5 88.2 97.2 98.6 98.G 

Microwave ovens.-------------- {NA) {NA) (NA) 2.3 5.0 5.5 (NA) (NA) (NA) 3.2 6. 7 7.1 

Mixers._----------------------- 29.0 41.9 52.8 65.6 70.1 71.8 56.0 72.8 82.4 90.2 92.4 92.2 

Radios. ____ ------------_------- 50.3 57.3 63.9 72.6 75.8 77.8- 194.3 199.5 99.8 99.9 99.9 99.9 

Ranges: Free-standing _________ 16.0 18.5 25.9 35.8 39.2 39.5 30.9 32.1 40.5 49.2 51.8 50,8 

Built-in •• ------------- 3.3 5.9 9.6 14.0 15.2 15.4 6.4 10.3 15.0 19.3 20.l 19.8 

Refrigerators ___________________ 50.8 57.3 68.9 72.6 75.8 77 .6 98.2 99.5 99.8 99.9 99.9 99.7 

Television: Black and white ____ 46.2 55.9 63.2 72.6 75.B 77.8 89.4 97.1 98. 7 99.9 99.9 99.9 

Color _______________ (NA) 5.5 27.2 54.1 61. 7 66.3 (NA) 9.5 42.5 74.4 81.3 85,2 

Toasters _______________ ------- __ 37.2 48.1 59.3 71. 7 75.8 77 .8 72.0 83.6 92.6 98.6 99.9 99.9 

Vacuum cleaners--------------- 38.4 48.1 58.9 72.l 75.8 77.7 74.3 83.5 92.0 99.2 99.9 99.9 

Washers, clothes ________________ 28.6 33.1 39.8 50.8 55.6 58.5 55.4 57.4 62.1 69.9 13.3 75.2 

Water heaters------------------ 9.8 13.5 20.2 29.4 (N.A.) (NA) 18.9 23.4 31.6 40.4 (NA) (NA) 

NA Not available. X Not applicable. i Based on 53,300,000 homes in 1960, and 58,566,000 in lll65. 

Source: Billboard Publications, Inc., New York, N. Y., Merchandising, annual statistical issues. (Copyright.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 03/03-0263]

Notice is hereby given that Argosy Investment Partners V, L.P., 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2900, Wayne, PA 19087, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Argosy Investment Partners V, L.P. is seeking post-financing approval from SBA for loan and equity financings it made to POSC Holdings LLC, formerly known as Panhandle Oilfield Service Companies, Inc., 14000 Quail Springs Parkway, Suite 300, Oklahoma City, OK 73134.

                    The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P., an Associate of Argosy Investment Partners V, L.P., owns more than ten percent of POSC Holdings LLC, and therefore this transaction is considered                     *Financing an Associate*                     requiring prior SBA approval. Argosy Investment Partners V, L.P. has already made its investments in POSC Holdings LLC and is seeking post-financing SBA approval.                

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on this transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2018-16205 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                             135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     85,978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,809
<PP&E>                                         169,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 226,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,992
<BONDS>                                         11,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,483
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   226,784
<SALES>                                         65,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,866
<CGS>                                           21,899
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,140
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
#### Austin LLOYD and Ruby Lloyd, his wife, Petitioners, v. The CITY OF FORT PIERCE, a municipal corporation, et al., Respondents.

No. 41127.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.75


 


AMENDMENT TO


 


STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment dated as of
September 15, 2022 (“Amendment”) amends the Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as
of January 6, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), by and among La Rosa Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Buyer”),
and NORKIS FERNANDEZ, (the “Seller”), and LA ROSA REALTY LAKE NONA, INC, a Florida corporation located at 8236 Lee
Vista Blvd. Orlando, FL 32829 (the “Company,” and together with the Buyer and Seller, the “Parties,”
and individually, the “Parties”).”


 


The Parties hereby agree to
amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1.          Schedule
A of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


SCHEDULE A


 


	Buyer:	 	La Rosa Holdings Corp.
	Company:	 	LA ROSA REALTY LAKE NONA, INC
	Seller:	 	NORKIS FERNANDEZ
	Percentage of Seller’s Membership Interest in the Company being sold to the Buyer:	 	51%
	Aggregate Purchase Price:	 	$1,674,993.50
	Cash:	 	$50,000.00
	Common Stock (1):	 	Shares valued at $1,624,993.50


 


	 	(1)	The number of shares issued will be the dollar amount of the Common Stock divided by the final sales price of the Company’s common stock in its underwritten public offering.


 


2.          Except
as otherwise stated herein, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


 


3.          All
matters relating to this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Florida without
giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of Florida or any other jurisdiction).


 


4.          This
Amendment and the schedules and exhibits to be delivered hereunder constitute the sole and entire agreement of the Parties with respect
to the subject matter contained herein, and supersede all prior and contemporaneous understandings and agreements, both written and oral,
with respect to such subject matter hereof.


 


5.          This
Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to be
one and the same agreement. A signed copy of this Amendment delivered by facsimile, e-mail, or other means of electronic transmission
shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy of this Amendment.


 


[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE NEXT PAGE.]


 




    	 



     


    

  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date set forth above by their respective representatives thereunto
duly authorized.


 


	Buyer:	LA ROSA HOLDINGS CORP.
	 	By:	/s/ Joseph La Rosa
	 	Name:	Joseph La Rosa
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	Company:	LA ROSA REALTY LAKE NONA, INC
	 	By:	/s/ Norkis Fernandez
	 	Name:	Norkis Fernandez
	 	Title:	President
	 	 	 
	Seller:	NORKIS FERNANDEZ
	 	By:	/s/ Norkis Fernandez
	 	Name:	Norkis Fernandez
	 	Address:	8236 Lee Vista Blvd.
	 	 	Orlando FL 32829