**SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST** (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V) SI P Submitted by : West Virginia Division of Air Qualit y Date Submitted: July

1, 2013 (date EPA received submission) Subject: 2010 1

- hou r Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality S tandard (NAAQS) Infrastructure S tate I mplementation P lan (SI P) Revision Completeness Review Completed by : Ellen Schmitt Date Completed: July 17, 2013 **Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE** 

**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)** 1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA appro val of the plan or revision thereof. 1. Letter dated June 25, 2013 from Rand y C. Huffman Cabinet Secretary , West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection to Shawn Garvin Regional Administrator. X
2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance d ate. 2

. West Virginia’s submittal indicate s applicable state code and regulations that support the requirements of 110(a)(2) SI P In frastructure Requirements for implementation of the 2010 SO 2 NAAQS. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority

under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. As noted in the state’s submittal, West Virginia has authority pursuant to West Virginia Code SS 22

- 1

- 3(a), 22

- 5
- 4(a)(4) and 22

- 5
- 4(a)(17) to promulgate rules in acco rdance with the Administra tive P rocedures Act (WVA Code SS 29A3

- 1 et.seq)

. X**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)** 4. A cop y of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by

reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable

. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated b y the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable b y the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possibl e, be indicated in the document itself. 4. State regulations have been previousl y approved for the West Virginia SIP a nd are being certified or referenced in the submittal. X

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of t he State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. To meet this requirement, West Virginia submitted to EPA a cover letter dated June 25, 2013, the final SI P revision and the state’s response to comments wh ich were received during the April 19, 2013 to May

20, 2013 public comment period. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved b y EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Notice of the public comment period was provided on WV Department of Air Quality ’s (DAQ) public notice and comment webpage. X
7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. A public h earing was held on May 20, 2013. A ccording to WV DAQ , no substantive verbal comments concerning the proposed SI P revision were provided during the hearing. X
8. Compilation of public comments and the Stat e's response thereto. 8 . Public comments were received and, as required , WV DAQ responded to these comments. West Virginia provided EPA with a summary

of the comments received during the public comment period and DAQ’s response s. X**Technical Materials EPA REQUIREMENT**  **STATE SUBMITTAL (X)** 

1. I dentification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. The 2010 1

- hour SO2 NAAQS is incorporated by reference in West Virginia Legi slative Rule 45CSR8. X 2. I dentification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Most regulations apply statewide a s applicable. X
3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from aff ected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 3. This SI P submittal does not modify existing emission limits. X

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility , as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. The SI P revision address es the required section 110(a)(2) SI P elements

. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsi te data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analy sis. 5. The authorit y to do modeling is discussed in the revision under Element K. X

6. Evidence, where nece ssary , that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology

. 6. West Virginia has adopted control measures and emission limitations that are listed in the West Virginia SI P. X 7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limi tations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary , to ensure emission levels. 7. These authorities are discussed in the revision under Element s D and F
. X**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)**

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how co mpliance will be determined in practice. 8

. West Virginia has compliance/enforcement strategies as indicated in their SI P. X 9. Special economic and technological justifications required b y an y applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why .) 9. NA X 10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 y ears after redesignation. 10

. NA X