alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                             DIEDRICH COFFEE, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Twelve Weeks               Twelve Weeks
                                              Ended                      Ended
                                        September 20, 2000         September 22, 1999
                                        ------------------         ------------------
<S>                                     <C>                        <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net loss............................           $ (1,112,464)              $  (389,491)
                                               ============               ===========
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period ......             12,645,356                12,022,467
                                               ============               ===========

Basic net loss per share ...........           $      (0.09)              $     (0.03)
                                               ============               ===========

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Diluted net loss ...................           $ (1,112,464)              $  (389,491)
                                               ============               ===========

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period ......             12,645,356                12,022,467

Incremental shares attributable to the
exercise of outstanding options ....                      -                         -
                                               ------------               -----------

    Total shares ...................             12,645,356                12,022,467
                                               ============               ===========

Diluted net loss per share                     $      (0.09)              $     (0.03)
                                               ============               ===========

</TABLE>
#### Koral K. FERRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-665.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 1971.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Gene H. Auvil, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of the crime of robbery after a trial before the court without jury. On this appeal the only point presented by appellant urges that the testimony of the victim is unworthy of belief. He relies upon Williams v. State, 100 Fla. 814, 130 So. 456 (1930), Callaway v. State, 112 Fla. 599, 152 So. 429 (1933) and Haag v. State, 111 Fla. 781, 149 So. 566 (1933).

We have examined the testimony in the light of the principles set forth in the cited cases but find that the decision here is to be determined upon the discussion of the Supreme Court of Florida in State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 893. The evidence is sufficient and the finder of fact *627is charged with the determination of its believability unless the evidence is patently so lacking in weight as to constitute a failure of proof to the degree required.

Affirmed.
BEFORE THE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ )

Joint Application of ) ) AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. )

and ) DOCKET OST

- 20 00

- 6824
CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED ) )
under 14 CFR Part 212 for statements of ) authorization (code

- sharing) ) __________________________________________)

JOINT NOTICE OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
AND CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED
OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John R. Mietus, Jr. LAW OFFICE OF JOHN MIETUS, LLC 6701 Democracy Boulevard Ste 300 Bethesda, Maryland 20817 (202) 747

- 5212 john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for CATHAY PACIFIC Robert A. Wirick Managing Director, Regulatory and

International Affairs AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5635 DFW Airport, Texas 75161 (817) 963

- 0394
robert.wirick@aa.com

November 4, 2014
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                            STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE 
                                                 HPR INC.

<S>                                                                                  <C>            <C>    
Type of security

For the quarter ended September 30,                                                      1997           1996

Common stock outstanding, beginning of period ...................................    15,325,000     15,012,000
Weighted average common stock issued during the period ..........................        22,000         63,000
Assumed exercise of common share options ........................................     1,960,000      1,340,000
Purchase of common stock under the treasury stock method ........................      (983,000)      (317,000)
Weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding    16,324,000     16,098,000

</TABLE>
#### Donald CRAWLEY v. Clyde R. BEASLEY.

No. 44936.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 4, 1967.

Suggestion of Error Overruled Jan. 15,1968.

Patterson, Senter & King, Aberdeen, for appellant.

Mitchell & Rogers, Tupelo, for appellee.

BRADY, Justice.

The facts and issues in this cause are the same as those in the companion case of Francis v. Sisk, 205 So.2d 254 (Miss.Dec. 4, 1967). For the reasons stated therein, this cause is affirmed.

Affirmed.

All Justices concur.
262 La. 1095

#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Luther E. BRANCH, Jr., et al.

No. 52652.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1972.

In re: Willie Campbell applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 262 So.2d 547.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
Page 123

Exhibit 23.1



                            McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

            Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, Independent Auditor

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Cone Mills Corporation's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-31977; 33-31979; 33-51951;
33-51953; 33-53705 and 33-67800) of our reports; dated February 19, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cone Mills Corporation for the fiscal year ended
January 3, 1999.





                                             /s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
                                             ---------------------------
                                                 McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 29, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1348 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 196
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1348

                          [Report No. 113-109]

              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2013

 Mr. Carper (for himself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           September 23, 2013

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Award Program 
Reauthorization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION.

    Section 108 of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 808) is 
amended by striking ``October 1, 2013'' and inserting ``October 1, 
2018''.
                                                       Calendar No. 196

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1348

                          [Report No. 113-109]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 23, 2013

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCo2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Michael E. DeDomenico
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          May 15, 2003
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 38140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9040-6]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7156 or https://www2.epa.gov/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 07/23/2018 Through 07/27/2018
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20180170, Final, BLM, NV, Greater Phoenix Project, Review 
Period Ends: 09/04/2018,Contact: Christine Gabriel 775-635-4000
EIS No. 20180171, Draft, USFS, AK, Chugach National Forest Land 
Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Comment Period 
Ends: 11/01/2018, Contact: Denise Downie 907-743-9426
EIS No. 20180172, Draft, NPS, TN, Contaminated Mine Drainage Mitigation 
and Treatment Programmatic/Site Specific Draft EIS, Comment Period 
Ends: 09/17/2018, Contact: Michael B. Edwards 303-969-2694
EIS No. 20180173, Draft, FHWA, SC, Carolina Crossroads I-20/26/126 
Corridor Project, Comment Period Ends: 09/17/2018, Contact: J. Shane 
Belcher 803-253-3187
EIS No. 20180174, Draft, NPS, FL, Gulf Islands National Seashore 
Personal Watercraft Plan, Comment Period Ends: 09/17/2018, Contact: Dan 
Brown 850-934-2613
EIS No. 20180175, Final, FERC, CA, Lassen Lodge Final Environmental 
Impact Statement, Review Period Ends: 09/04/2018, Contact: Kenneth 
Hogan 202-502-8434
EIS No. 20180176, Draft, BLM, NM, Carlsbad Draft Resource Management 
Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Comment Period Ends: 11/05/
2018, Contact: Hector Gonzales 575-234-5968

Amended Notice

    Revision to the Federal Register Notice published 07/20/2018, 
extend comment period from 08/20/2018 to 08/27/2018, EIS No. 20180164, 
Final, USFS, CA, Exchequer Restoration Project, Contact: Elaine Locke 
559-885-5355.

    Dated: July 30, 2018.
Kelly Knight,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2018-16572 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 2, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 27, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 456 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-200, CP2018-278.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-16519 Filed 8-1-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 23.2


                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 Nos. 33-31977; 33-31979; 33-51951; 33-51953; 33-53705, 333-37054,  333-60954
and 33-67800) of our report dated February 15, 2002, with respect to the balance
sheet of Parras Cone de Mexico,  S.A. de C.V. as of December 31,  2001,  and the
related  statements of income,  stockholders'  equity and cash flow for the year
then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report on Form
10-K/A of Cone Mills Corporation.



KPMG Cardenas Dosal, S.C.



/s/ Jose Luis Hernandez Garcia
    Jose Luis Hernandez Garcia



Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
June 13, 2002
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. E. C. LUNSFORD, Relator, v. The Honorable Arthur E. HUTTOE, Judge of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, and H. K. Terry, Respondents.

No. 71-1331.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1499 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 278 Main Street in Chadron, Nebraska, as 

the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1499 ES

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT CORY MRACEK MEMORIAL POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 278 Main Street in Chadron, Ne5 braska, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

6 Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek 

11 Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate November 12, 2013. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1499 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMracek Memorial Post Office’’. Chadron, Nebraska, as the ‘‘Sergeant Cory al Service located at 278 Main Street in
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DIEDRICH 
COFFEE INC. UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED AND 
AS OF OCTOBER 29, 1997 CONTAINED IN COMPANY'S AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   10-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-29-1997
<CASH>                                       1,550,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  265,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,480,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,860,904
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,841,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,498,811
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,917
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,841,174
<SALES>                                     17,241,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,241,114
<CGS>                                        8,619,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,619,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,328,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,817,135)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,890
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (6,820,025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,820,025)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
MICHAEL SINDRAM, Plaintiff,

v. DERRICKMONROE, Defendants. 

### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED JUN 1 6

## 2009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

# 09 1099

This matter comes before the court onreview ofplaintiffs application to proceed in formapauperis, his request for leave to file the complaint, and thepro se civil complaint itself. The court will grant leave to file, grant the application to proceed informapauperis, and dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffalleges that the defendant, described as an individual "with oversight over civil division filings in [the] Superior Court [ofthe] District ofColumbia," has refused to "accept [or] permit [plaintiffs] filings" in a civil action now pending in that court, in order "to fetter [plaintiffs] access to courts andjustice." Compi.**~** 4. For these allegedly unconstitutional acts, plaintiffdemands injunctive reliefand unspecified monetary damages. See 

## id. at 3 (prayer for relief). In general,judges are immune from suit for money damages. See, e.g., Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9 (1991); Cleavinger v. Saxner, 474 U.S. 193 (1985); Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478 (1978); Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967); seeMoore v. Motz, 437 F. Supp. 2d 88, 91 (D.D.C. 2006). "The common law immunity of judges is fully applicable in suits under 42 U.S.c. § 1983 alleging deprivations ofconstitutional rights." Clark v. Taylor, 627 F.2d 284,287 (D.C. Cir.



# 31980) (per curiam) (citingPierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. at 553-55). "Case law has recognized that the protection of judicial immunityis not confined onlytojudgesbut may extend to other officers ofgovernment whose duties are related to thejudicial process." Nwachukwu v. Rooney, 362 F. Supp. 2d 183,192 (D.D.C. 2005) (citations omitted). In this Circuit, absolutejudicial immunity extends to clerks ofthe court. Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460-61 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (per curiam). "[I]mmunity applies to all acts ofauxiliary court personnel that are 'basic and integral part[s] ofthejudicial function,' unless those acts are done 'inthe clear absence ofall jurisdiction.'" !d. at 1461 (quoting Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Dist. of Nevada, 828 F.2d 1385, 1390 (9th Cir. 1987)). It appears that a Superior Court clerk's decisions to accept orreject a litigant's filings are basic and integral to the court's function and such decisions fall within the defendant'sjurisdiction. The Court will dismiss the complaint in its entiretybecausejudicial immunityprotects the defendant from suit. See Hurt v. Clerks, Superior Court of District of Columbia, No. 06-5308,2006 WL 3835759, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 22, 2006) (per curiam) (affirming the dismissal ofan action againstjudicial clerks to whom absolute judicial immunity is extended); McAllister v. District of Columbia, 653 A.2d 849,851 (D.C. 1995) (holding that "court clerks, likejudges, should be immune from damage suits for performing tasks that are integrallyrelated to thejudicialprocess."). An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

United

# Stat~ Date: