alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  First Quarter 2003 and 2004

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                    First     First    Standard
                                   quarter   quarter   error on  Standard     2004
Type                                 2003      2004      2004    error on   Percent
                                   estimate  estimate  estimate difference  of total

All housing units.................  120,249   121,633       216        306       100

  Occupied........................  105,407   105,870       228        322        87
    Owner occupied................   71,645    72,666       228        322        60
    Renter occupied...............   33,762    33,204       181        256        27

  Vacant..........................   14,842    15,763       132        184        13
    Year-round vacant.............   11,319    12,067       117        162        10
      For rent....................    3,553     3,904        68         94         3
      For sale only...............    1,242     1,273        39         55         1
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy..........      825       935        34         46         1
      Held off market.............    5,699     5,955        83        117         5
        For occasional use........    1,992     2,031        49         69         2
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence elsewhere.    1,145     1,028        35         51         1
        For other reasons.........    2,562     2,896        59         81         2

    Seasonal vacant...............    3,523     3,696        66         92         3

NOTE:  The Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancies and Homeownership (CPS/HVS) estimates are now controlled to
              independent housing unit estimates.  This should make the CPS/HVS estimate of housing units more
              comparable to other Census Bureau housing surveys.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<CAPTION>



<S>
                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           Dec-31-2000
<CASH>                                      28,157
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          97
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,221
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      80,492
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        80,881
<LOANS>                                    459,971
<ALLOWANCE>                                  4,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             594,693
<DEPOSITS>                                 533,809
<SHORT-TERM>                                10,400
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,971
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,244
<COMMON>                                     8,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             594,693
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             37,647
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,353
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                76
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            42,076
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          17,434
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,801
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       23,275
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,028
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             26,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,702
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,487
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,487
<EPS-BASIC>                                22.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                21.86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                8.10
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,169
<LOANS-PAST>                                   205
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             4,136
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  957
<RECOVERIES>                                   505
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,712
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,712
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0












</TABLE>
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: September 1 7 , 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: Angela Hackel, Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards, Office of Air and Radiation SUBJECT: September 17, 2004, m eeting with WE ACT for Environmental Justice, r egarding

Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on September 17 , 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. **ATTENDEES United States Environmental Protection Agency**  Laura McKelvey , OAR Ted Palma, OAR Angela Hackel, OAR Amanda Curry

Brown, OAR Arthur Zuco, OAR Mikhail Adamantiades, OAR Regina Chappell, OAR Chebryll Edwards, OAR Marguerite McLamb, OAR Phil L orang, OAR Neal Fann, OAR Marva King, OEJ **Outside Organizations** Mr. Brent Newell, Center for Race, Povert y & Environment Rev. Leo Woodberry , Kingdom Living Temple Dr. Nicky Sheats, New Jersey Environmental Jus tice Alliance/Thomas Edison State College Dr. Cecilia Martinez, Center for Earth, Energy and Democracy Dr. Erica Holloman, Southeast CARE Coalition Ms. Sharon Lewis, Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice Mr. Cecil Corbin

- Mark, WE ACT for Environm ental Justice Dr. Jalonne L . White

- Newsome, WE ACT for Environmental Justice
#### CLEAN RITE COIN WASHER SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Richard DOETSCH, Appellee.

No. 72-782.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID SCREEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-143

[April 30, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.801 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Timothy L. Bailey, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-5671CF10A.

David Screen, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Louise HENDRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-868.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Roger F. Dykes, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Page 50

EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES


                     CONE MILLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                    Percentage
                                                                                    State or                        of Voting
                                                                                Jurisdiction of                     Securities
                  Name                             Address                       Incorporation                       Owned
--------------------------------------       ---------------------             -------------------              -----------------
<S>                                          <C>                               <C>                                      <C>
Cone Mills (Mexico), S.A.                    Mexico City                       Mexico, D. F.                             99 %
     de C.V.

Comercializadora Cone Mills,                 Mexico City                       Mexico, D.F.                              99
     S.A. de C.V.

Cone Mills (Europe) S.A.                     Zaventem, Belgium                 Brussels, Belgium                        100

Cone Singapore, PTE., Ltd.                   Singapore                         Republic of Singapore                    100

Cone Foreign Sales                           Greensboro, NC                    Barbados                                 100
     Corporation

Cone Mills International                     Greensboro, NC                    North Carolina                           100
     Corporation

Cone Global Finance Corp.                    San Francisco, CA                 California                               100

CIPCO S.C., Inc.                             Carlisle, S.C.                    Delaware                                 100

Cornwallis Development Co.                   Greensboro, NC                    North Carolina                           100

Boelas Pipeline                              Greensboro, NC                    Louisiana                                100
     Corporation

Cliffside Railroad                           Cliffside, NC                     North Carolina                            98
     Company

House 'N Home Fabrics                        New York, NY                      New York                                 100
     and Draperies, Inc.

Cone Receivables, LLC                        Greensboro, NC                    Delaware                                 100

Cone Foreign Trading, LLC                    Greensboro, NC                    North Carolina                           100
</TABLE>
### The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Western District of Missouri. ___________ No. 96-1572

___________ Jay L. Werner, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Stephen L. Hill, United States * [UNPUBLISHED] Attorney, Western District of * Missouri, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 30, 1996 Filed: August 2, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jay L. Werner appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 1 declaratory-judgment action challenging the constitutionality of Federa l Rule of C riminal Procedure 6(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 515 (1994). Havin g reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the district properlydismissed the action. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 149 (Thursday, August 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 37831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Parcel Select Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): August 2, 
2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
July 27, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request 
of the United States Postal Service to Add Parcel Select Contract 32 to 
Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2018-197, CP2018-275.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-16520 Filed 8-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 1 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2019, the “Emergency Application to 

Appoint Counsel to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Extend Time to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal” and the Application to Expedite are DENIED.
# A

http://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/files/annual22/ann22def.pdf
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

PERSONNEL GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. AND AFFILIATES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Personnel Group of America,
Inc.(the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Larry L. Enterline, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Larry L. Enterline

Larry L. Enterline
Chief Executive Officer
August 7, 2002

25
#### TRAVEL IS FUN, INC., Petitioner, v. William J. HARTNETT and Keystone Press of Miami, Inc., Respondents.

No. 77-2381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1978.

Timothy H. Kenney, Miami, for petitioner.

Ritter & Ritter, Coral Gables, for respondents.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By this petition for a writ of certiorari, the petitioner Travel Is Fun, Inc. seeks review of an order of the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida affirming in its appellate capacity an order of the County Court of Dade County, Florida. Said county court order set aside two final summary judgments entered in favor of the petitioner and against the respondents William J. Hartnett and Keystone Press of Miami, Inc. in two consolidated county court actions. In our view, the county court had no jurisdiction to enter the order setting aside these final judgments because the said order was entered upon a motion filed by the respondents which cannot be construed as (1) a timely petition for rehearing under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.530(a), (b), Fla.R.Sum.P. 7.020, or (2) a proper motion to vacate judgment under Fla.R.Sum.P. 7.190(b). As such, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in affirming this order on appeal. *Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pearson,*236 So.2d 1 (Fla.1970); *Nahoom v. Nahoom,*341 So.2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Fiber Crete Homes, Inc.*v. *Division of Administration,*315 So.2d 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Investment Corp. of South Florida v. Florida Thoroughbred Breeders Ass’n,*256 So.2d 227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); *In re Trust of Aston,*245 So.2d 674 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the order under review quashed, and the cause remanded with directions to reverse the county court order originally appealed from and to reinstate the final summary judgments entered herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                             576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,632)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,745
<PP&E>                                          40,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (14,750)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 729,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           331
<OTHER-SE>                                     367,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   729,827
<SALES>                                        216,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,856
<CGS>                                          155,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,074
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,042
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16


</TABLE>
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Third Quarter 2002 



                                    Rental vacancy rates


                           Third        Third      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           2002         2001       2002 rate   difference


United States..........         9.1          8.4          0.2          0.3

  Inside MAs...........         8.7          8.0          0.2          0.3
    In central cities..         9.5          8.8          0.3          0.4
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         7.8          7.1          0.3          0.4
  Outside MAs..........        11.0         10.4          0.5          0.7

 Northeast.............         6.0          5.5          0.3          0.5
 Midwest...............        10.3          9.3          0.4          0.6
 South.................        11.6         10.8          0.3          0.5
 West..................         6.9          6.6          0.3          0.5



                                    Homeowner vacancy rates


                           Third        Third      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           2002         2001       2002 rate   difference

United States..........         1.7          1.9          (z)          0.1

  Inside MAs...........         1.6          1.7          0.1          0.1
    In central cities..         2.2          2.3          0.1          0.2
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         1.3          1.5          0.1          0.1
  Outside MAs..........         2.0          2.4          0.1          0.2

 Northeast.............         1.2          1.3          0.1          0.2
 Midwest...............         1.7          1.8          0.1          0.2
 South.................         1.9          2.3          0.1          0.1
 West..................         1.6          1.7          0.1          0.2

     (z) Less than 0.05.
PUBLIC LAW 410-JUNE 18, 1954 [68 ST A T . 

Restriction. 

original Fort Buford, North Dakota, which is more particularly 

described as follows: 

Beginning at a point on the east-west quarter line, said point being 

located south eighty-nine degrees fifty-four minutes east two thousand 

three hundred and fifteen feet from the west quarter corner of section 

16, in township 152 north, range 104 west, of the fifth principal 

meridian, Williams County, North Dakota; thence north no degrees 

six minutes east one thousand four hundred feet; thence south eightynine degrees fifty-four minutes east one thousand feet; thence south 

no degrees six minutes west one thousand four hundred feet to the 

quarter line; thence along east-west quarter line north eighty-nine 

degrees fifty-four minutes west one thousand feet to the point of 

beginning, containing thirty-two and fourteen one-hundredtns acres, 

more or less, in said section. 

SEC. 2. The conveyance authorized in the first section shall not be 

made until the Legislative Assembly of the State of North Dakota 

and the North Dakota Kural Rehabilitation Corporation have assented 

thereto. 

Approved June 18, 1954. 

June 18, 1954 

[H. R. 2226] 

Public Law 410 CHAPTER 314 

AN ACT 

To repeal the provision of the Act of July 1, 1902 (32 Stat. 662), as amended, 

relating to pay of civilian employees of the Navy Department appointed for 

duty beyond the continental limits of the United States and in Alaska. 

Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the 

^Navy Depart- Uj^ited States of America in Congress assemhled^ That the second 

Employee transit paragraph Under the heading "Emergency Fund, Navy Department" 

^1'A use 506. of the Act of July 1, 1902 (32 Stat. 662), as amended (54 Stat. 383), 

which reads: 

Repeal. "The Secretary of the Navy, in his discretion, is authorized to pay 

all civilian employees appointed for duty beyond the continental limits 

of the United States, and in Alaska, from the date of their sailing from 

the United States until they report for duty to the officer under whom 

they are to serve, and while returning to the United States by the most 

direct route and with due expedition, compensation at a rate corresponding to their rate of pay while actually employed." is repealed. 

Approved June 18, 1954. 

June 18, 1954 

[H. R. 8487] 

Public Law 411 CHAPTER 315 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act of June 19, 1948, to provide for censuses of manufactures, 

mineral industries, and other businesses, relating to the year 1954. 

13 us e 121. 

Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the 

United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1 (a) 

of the Act of June 19,1948 (62 Stat. 478), is amended by the addition 

of the following proviso: '"'Provided further, That the censuses of 

manufactures, of mineral industries, and of other businesses, including 

the distributive trades and service establishments, directed to be 

taken in the year 1954 relating to the year 1953, shall be taken instead 

in the year 1955 relating to year 1954". 

Approved June 18, 1954.