alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                    TEL-SAVE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           FOR THE THREE MONTHS      FOR THE SIX MONTHS
                                                                ENDED JUNE 30,          ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                          --------------------------------------------------
                                                               1998         1997           1998           1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                       <C>           <C>           <C>             <C>      
Net loss                                                  $(96,154)     $ (5,865)     $(137,949)      $   (435)
                                                          =========     =========     ==========              
BASIC
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic:          64,486       63,898          64,320        63,171
                                                          =========     ========      ==========              
Net loss per share - Basic                                 $  (1.49)    $   (.09)     $   (2.14)     $     (.01)
                                                           =========    ==========    ==========               

DILUTED
Weighted average common and common equivalent
    shares outstanding - Diluted:
Weighted average shares                                      64,486       63,898          64,320        63,171
Weighted average equivalent shares                               --           --              --            --
Weighted average common and common equivalent
    shares - Diluted                                         64,486       63,898          64,320        63,171
                                                           ========     ========      ==========              

Net loss per share - Diluted                               $  (1.49)    $   (.09)     $   (2.14)     $    (.01)
                                                           =========    ==========    ==========               

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,422,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,132,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,874
<INVENTORY>                                    261,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,065,584
<PP&E>                                       4,104,989
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,047,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,523,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,123,980
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,722
<COMMON>                                     2,645,652
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,593,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,523,204
<SALES>                                      7,710,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,145,705
<CGS>                                        5,553,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,464,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,545,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             283,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,631,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (10,631,655)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (10,863,875)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.57)



</TABLE>
________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

The application for writ of certiorari filed on April

21, 2016 by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee, State of Hawai  i, is

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding

scheduling.

Justin Kollar and

Tracy Murakami

for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0003039

01-JUN-2016

11:08 AM

SCWC-13-0003039

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

STATE OF HAWAI  I, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

VICENTE KOTEKAPIKA HILARIO, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP -13-0003039; CR. NO. 11-1-0023)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, June 1, 2016.

Keith S. Shigetomi

for respondent
7—224. oF
TWELFTH CENSUS oF. ‘THE NED STATES.

- 39 A
oy | SCHEDULE No. 1 —POPULATION. Necges an re) “Y i

County LOA rf

Township or other division of county.———. aie : — -— wWame of Institution, . =
¥ visio ons.

Name of incorporated city, town, or village, within the above-named division, , om Ward of city, g 7. Fecinct Q i£ +2

Get of) ©
oor |
1G

Enumerated by me on the ae —, Enumerator.

LOCATION. NAME RELATION. SON 2 S N CITIZENSHIP. OCCUPATION, TRADE, OR EDUCATION, OWNERSHIP OF HOME,

Place of birth of cach person and parents of each person enumerated. If born in the Un‘ted PROFESSION
States, give the State or Territory; if of foreign birth, give the Country only. of each person TEN YEARS of age

and over.

of each person whose place of
abode on Jnne 1, 1900, was
in this family.

(in
gaged.

IN CITIES. | £

married
lyvorcod.
ee ae
y

rd

Enter sarnamo first, then the given name and Relationship of each
middle initial, ifany. person to the head
0 nc la '.

States,

Place of birth of this Place of birth of Farnen Place of birth of Morure
of this person,

ar of tmmigration to

Unlteu States,

/

OccvPaTion,

montha).

widownd, o
|
United

Ixctupr every person living on June 1, 1900.
Omit children born since June 1, 1900.

onler of v

Mother of how man
D
Number of yours In tho

Attended achool

Naturalization,

Whother siglo, ma

. | Number of family, In the
- { visitati

* | Namber of farm schedule.

A

3 | Can speak Frglish.

% | Owned free or mort

* the

i ~~ ee.

a RAT.
kd 85 th

ws

a“

o

2 2 od ws 2 ww ws
—

o

zs s ~w
aD =€

oO

Cc ws
- OS

| $5049. : .
oem

cs
2

te
o&

w
t dm

; Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

available records like the one shown here.
ben epee pee Kone pew anesoe Baas BS,
#### The State of Missouri, *ex rel.,*T. C. Nesbitt, Respondent, *vs.*The Board of Education of Appleton City, Appellants.

1. *Statute, construction of-*— School *districts*— Towns—Territory *outside of corporate limits attached.*— Territory outside of town limits may bo taken in and attached for school purposes. [W. S. 1262, §1]

*d'ppeal from Si. Clair Circuit Court.*

*Henry Flanagan, with Ferguson fy Clark,*for Appellants,

relied upon, Eort Dodge School District, vs. Dist. Township Wahkausa, 15 Iowa, 134; Ind. School District of Granville vs. Supervisors, 25 Iowa, 305 ; Gist vs. State, 21 Ohio St., 339.

*Smith fy Johnson,*for Respondents.

The law of 1870 only authorized: Any Oity, town, or village, the plat, &c., together with the territory attached, &c., to be organized into, and established as a single school district, but did not authorize inhabitants of said town, or any part of them, to include under said organization neighboring territory not before attached thereto. (State vs. Searl, 50 Mo., 268.)

Wagner, Judge

delivered the opinion of the court.

Jndgment was given for the plaintiff in the court below, upon demurrer, and the only question in the case is, whether certain proceedings, by which territory outside of the town limits was attached to Appleton City for school purposes, were regular and legal.

At an election held for that purpose in pursuance of notice, the town, with other territory lying out of the corporate limits, was organized and established as a separate school district under the provisions of the statute. (W. S. 1262, § 1.)

The voters of the town, and also those inhabiting the outside district, participated in the election on the adoption of the law, and in the choice and selection of trustees ; but it is now insisted that there was no authority for attaching' or annexing any territory not included within the corporate limits. The statute above referred to declares that “ any city, town *128or village, the plat of which has previously been duly filed and recorded in the Recorder’s office of the county wherein the same is situate, together with the territory attached, or which shall hereafter be attached, to any such city, town or village for school purposes, may be organized into, and established as a single school district.” It would seem obvious enough from the reading of this statute, that it was not intended to confine the land to the territory attached to the town in its corporate capacity. The language is, “ the territory attached, or which shall be hereafter be attached to any city, town or village, for school purposes.”

This clearly contemplates, that territory outside of the town limits may be taken in and attached for school purposes, as convenience may require, whenever the people interested may so desire. It then becomes dis-annex.ed from the former school district, and constitutes attached territory in’the sense of the law.

I therefore think the Circuit Court erred, and its judgment <

must be be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other Judges concur.
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: November 6, 2014 5 18809

________________________________ In the Matter of SCOTTIE MORRISON, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: September 16, 2014 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________ Scottie Morrison, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner was scanned with a hand scanner that activated near his waist, prompting a strip frisk to be authorized. He attempted to retrieve an item from his waist when his wrist restraints were removed for the frisk, and correction officers were obliged to subdue him. He was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with attempting to assault staff and failing to comply with frisk procedures. A sharpened piece of metal was recovered from the area soon after the incident occurred, and-2- 518809

petitioner was charged in a second misbehavior report with possessing a weapon. Following a combined tier III disciplinary hearing on both reports, he was found guilty of failing to comply with frisk procedures and possessing a weapon. The determination was affirmed upon administrative review, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. We confirm. Substantial evidence, in the form of the misbehavior reports, related documentation and hearing testimony, supports the determination of guilt (see Matter of Fowler v Fischer, 106 AD3d 1344, 1345 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 865 [2013]; Matter of Jackson v Fischer, 98 AD3d 766, 767 [2012]). Petitioner was not charged with disobeying a direct order and, contrary to his contention, no direct order to comply with established frisk procedures was necessary. Rather, his actions in forecfully attempting to reach into his waistband and the ensuing struggle were sufficient evidence of his active resistance and failure to comply with the efforts to frisk him. His remaining claims, to the extent preserved, have been considered and found to lack merit. Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
1957... 618.9

67.0

64.7

0.5

187.1

61.0

867.1

46.6

8.164

,967

617.9

80.6

463.8

81.4

64.6

9.2

828.

97.5

48.9

1966 7.6

544.9

58.7

611.2

624.1

606.3

84.4

14.4

141.2

161.6

179.6

134.1

S4.9

146.6

141.5

138.3

326.4

09.4

824.4

2,742

,698

2,479

2,380

2,266

463.4

49.6

476.8

469.7

460.4

407.4

07.7

420.8

409.6

892.9

46.0

1.8

55.0

60.1

67.6

284.7

78.8

276.2

267.4

254.7

45.3

1954....

1952 821.1

1961 88.5

1960 606.4

71.4

661.6

506.4

454.4

196.3

03.0

210.6

201.2

199.6

136.8

28.4

121.1

106.4

278.8

45.0

229.9

198.8

166.6

2,229

,125

1,824

1,464

1.025

444.6

16.2

407.0

363.7

822.6

876.3

62.5

842.9

291.9

246.1

68.2

2.7

64.1

71.8

76.6

244.4

1948

280.6

01.8

160.0

107.8

62.0

8.3

1947

1946 98.2 (40.0

1946 428.9

93.

813.6

260.0

247.2

197.9

91.8

166.5

128.7

126.4

91.8

7.4

70.9

68.8

52.8

134.2

14.8

10 901

75

841

851

817

299.8

76.8

215.3

178.8

168.8

216.7

85.0

148.8

184.2

124.0

83.6

0.3

66.5

44.6

44.8

88.1

3.0

81.1

81.8

78.0

37.8

4.8

81.8

29.6

27.6

1944

1948 86.2

2.6

69.5

10

1941..

216.6

83.8

167.1

164.6

122.8

112.6

113.3

8.6

89.2

88.6

76.6

62.6

42.1

6.0

34.0

28.0

22.7

14.9

60.2

0.2

43.9

48.1

24.0

S6.1

765

06

660

629

147.1

28.9

111.4

114.2

118.8

00.1

92.6

91.6

83.8

8.8

18.9

22.6

70.9

4.4

61.4

56.1

26.7

8.9

22.6

1939

1987

19S6.

1985 •661 86.6 14.6

efore Federal income taxes.

ot available.

ncludes experimental stati*

491
IV

House Calendar No. 186

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 475

[Report No. 103–597]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1188) to provide for disclosures

for insurance in interstate commerce.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 12, 1994

Mr. GORDON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1188) to provide

for disclosures for insurance in interstate commerce.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 1188) to provide for disclosures for

6 insurance in interstate commerce. The first reading of the

7 bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be con8 fined to the bill and the amendments made in order by
2

HRES 475 RH

1 this resolution and shall not exceed one hour equally di2 vided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minor3 ity member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.

4 After general debate the bill shall be considered for

5 amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order

6 to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amend7 ment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the na8 ture of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

9 Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill. The com10 mittee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

11 considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of

12 the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and re13 port the bill to the House with such amendments as may

14 have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

15 vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Com16 mittee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amend17 ment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question

18 shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments

19 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except

20 one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 186

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 475

[Report No. 103–597]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1188)

state commerce.to provide for disclosures for insurance in interJULY 12, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF JUNE 30,  1997 AND THE  UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF INCOME  FOR THE SIX MONTHS  ENDED  JUNE 30,  1997 OF
TEL-SAVE  HOLDINGS,  INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         $43,146,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,592,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,804,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,508,000
<PP&E>                                          46,842,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,648,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 290,273,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,114,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              647,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                     252,512,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,159,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146,192,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  146,081,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (714,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (279,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (435,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (435,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)
                                               


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35288-35289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-
Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

[[Page 35289]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: July 25, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[reg] hereby 
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 
19, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request 
to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class Package 
Service Contract 42 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-193, CP2018-271.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-15843 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Viola A. FAUL, Petitioner, v. FARM STORES, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 43089.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      I, Joseph W. Pooler, Jr., the Senior Vice President of Finance of Pegasus
Media & Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of Pegasus Media &
Communications, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "June 3,
2003 Form 10-Q"), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the June 30, 2003 Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Pegasus Media & Communications, Inc.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Pegasus Media & Communications, Inc. and will be retained by
Pegasus Media & Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  August 14, 2003

                                             /s/ Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.