alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNION
PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION AT JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             105
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      457
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12
<INVENTORY>                                         91
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   685
<PP&E>                                          13,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              987
<BONDS>                                          4,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,866
<SALES>                                          1,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,120
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (6)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (20)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 14
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        14
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

41)
SA A a7,

Hisiols i AAW, abi EAPITNT)
Exhibit 23.2



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-17169 of Strategic Futures and Options, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report,
dated August 15, 2002, relating to the statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the period from January 22, 2001 (date of inception),
to September 30, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of TELS
Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2002.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 22, 2003
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth JOHNSON.

No. 61411.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Kenneth Johnson, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Granted. See *State v. Clark,*La., 317 So.2d 623 and *State ex rel. Booth v. Becker,*La., 345 So.2d 897. Applicant is ordered removed from Angola and incarcerated in Orleans pending his appeal.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., dissent from the order.
Black Swamp Productions, LLC 318 Thomas Drive Midway, GA 31320

October 19, 2015

US Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590

RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of FAA Reform Act and Part 11 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Ma'am:

Pursuant to section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012, Black Swamp Productions, LLC seeks an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations detailed below to allow commercial Unmanned Aerial Systems ("UAS") operations for photography, videography, mapping, inspections, and data collection services.

Application Information Black Swamp Productions, LLC Contact: Robert Stanford 318 Thomas Drive Midway, GA 31320 Phone: 912.272.5104 Email: Stanford.robert@gmail.com

Black Swamp Productions LLC will use the following unmanned aircraft ("UA'') for aerial photog:aphy, videography, mapping, inspections and data collection services. The UA are widely used in the aenal photography and mapping industry and have been approved in the listed exemptions:

11062 Astraeus Aerial: 11109 Clayco, Inc.: 11112 VDOS Global LLC:

Aircraft and Equipment: DJI Phantom 3 Pro DJIInspire Tarot 650 Tarot 900 Walkera QR X350 Docket No. FAA2014-0352 Docket No. FAA2014-0507 Docket No. FAA2014-0382

### ReRUiatlonsfrom which exemption is requested: 14 CFR 45.23 (b) Aircraft markings 14CFR 21 (h) Certification procedures; Airworthiness Certificates 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) Pilots, Flight Instructorand Ground Instructors 91.7(a) Airworthiness certificate 91.9(b)(2) Aircraft flight manual 91.103 Preflightactions 91.109 Flight instructions 91.119 Minimum safe altitudes 91.151(a) Fuel requirements forflights VFR conditions 91.203 (a)&(b) Aircraft certifications and registrations 91.405 Operations after Maintenance 91.409(a)(1)&(2) Inspections 91.417(a)&(b) Maintenance records

Black Swamp Productions, UC understandsthe Conditions and limitationsthatare likelyto be included withthe approved request forexemption and we are prepared tofully complywith them.

Black Swamp Productions, LLC is committedto operating UA safely. Flight operation will be conducted in accordance with the approved conditions and limitationsfromthe FAA. Specifically, flight operations with be performed within line ofsightwith a Pilot in Command (PIC) and avisual observer (VO). Flight operations will take place under400' AGL. Safety and operational guidelines from DJI, Tarot and Walkera will be followed foreveryflight. The safety systems built intothese platforms allows for return to launch technology with GPS ifflight control signal lost.



### Public Interest

The collection ofaerial photograph and data is currently obtained bythe use ofmanned aircraft. The use ofUAS technology benefits the public by reducing the risk due to manned aircraft accidents. Additionally, UAS platforms reduce the environmental impact such as the absence ofcombustible fuels and the reduction ofexhaust emissions and noise.

Thankyou foryour consideration of Black Swamp Productions, UC'sexemption request. Please contact us ifyou have any questions or need additional information.
#### Earl L. CORWIN, Appellant, v. Edward G. BUDD, Jr., Albert M. Greenfield, Edward Hopkins, Jr., W. Maxey Jarman, Robert W. Kenyon and Edmund L. Zalinski, as Trustees of the Greenfield Real Estate Investment Trust, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-1023.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. FELI CI A N O M EM I J E- SA N TO S, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 10339 D. C . No . 5 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 5 9 6 - J DF ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J e r e m yD . F oge l , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t23, 2010 ** B e f o r e : L E A V Y , H A W K I N S , a n d T H O M A S , C ir c u it J u d g e s . F el i ci ano M em i

j e- S ant os appeal s f

rom the 60 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rille g a l r e e n tryf

o llo w in g d e p o rta tio n , in vi ol a t i on of

8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED SEP 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 10339 2 M e m i j e - S a nt os c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d by i m pos i ng as e nt e nc e w i thoutpr ope r l yc ons i de r i ng hi s a r gum e nt s w i th r e s pe c tt o the appl i c a t i on of

a16- l e ve l e nha nc e m e ntba s e d upon e i the rof hi s tw o pr i orf

e l ony conv i ct i on s f

or cr i m es of vi ol ence . T he re cord ref l ec t s thatthe di stri ctcourt l i s t e ne d t o a nd c ons i de r e d M e m i j e - S a nt os ’ a r gum e nt s i n thi s r e ga r d, butf ound the c ir c u m s ta n c e s in s u f

f ic ie n t to w a rr a n t as e n te n c e lo w e rth a n th e o n e im p o s e d . See U n ite d S ta te s v . Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 d 9 8 4 , 9 9 5 - 9 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) ; see a l so U ni ted States v. R uiz- Cha i rez , 4 9 3 F .3 d 1 0 8 9 , 1 0 9 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ; cf . U ni ted States v. A m ez cua-V

asqu ez , 5 6 7 F .3 d 1 0 5 0 , 1 0 5 3 - 5 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . M e m ije - S a n to s a ls o c o n te n d s th a t th e s e n te n c e im p o s e d is s u b s ta n tiv e ly un re as on abl e bec ause i tw as grea t erthan n ec es saryt o acc om pl i sh the st atut ory purpos e s of

s e nt e nc i ng w he n c ons i de r e d i n l i ghtof the s i gni f

i c a ntm i t i ga t i ng f a c t or s tha the pr e s e nt e d. T he r e c or d r e f l e c t s tha tthe s e nt e nc e be l ow the G ui de l i ne s r a nge i s s ubs t a nt i ve l yr e a s onabl e unde rthe t ot a l i tyof the c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 -52 (20 07 ). AF F I RME D.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JASON MILISITS,

Petitioner

v.

BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 162 MM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or 

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 OF
TALK.COM INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         000948545
<NAME>                        TALK.COM
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                          70,436,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,311,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,189,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,038,000
<PP&E>                                         102,046,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,255,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 443,351,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,310,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           784,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,838,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   443,351,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               413,071,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,703,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               181,052,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,581,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,281,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,281,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,281,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.33)



</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Richard A. Wisot, the
chief financial officer of Transpro, Inc. (the "issuer"), does hereby certify
that the report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the "report")
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Richard A. Wisot
---------------------------
Richard A. Wisot
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)
Transpro, Inc.
October 8, 2004
```
#### Mearon COPELAND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-230.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Mearon Copeland, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, *87*S.Ct. *1396,*18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40204

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HECTOR RAMOS-MENDIOLA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1287-1 

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hector Ramos-Mendiola (Ramos) appeals his conviction and

sentence following his guilty plea to possession of more than 100

kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute. Ramos argues

for the first time on appeal that the district court abused its

discretion when it imposed a condition of supervised release that

requires him to cooperate in the collection of his DNA. Ramos’s

claim is not ripe for review. See United States v.

Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition
No. 05-40204

-2-

for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). Therefore, this

court lacks jurisdiction to review this claim, and this portion

of the appeal is dismissed.

Ramos correctly notes that his argument, made for the first

time on appeal, that the district court lacked jurisdiction to

convict and sentence him because 21 U.S.C. § 841 is

unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000), is foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d

580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000). Ramos’s conviction is affirmed.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNION
PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP, INC. CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
POSITION AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED
INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      282
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         42
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    31
<PP&E>                                           6,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              523
<BONDS>                                            673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,768
<SALES>                                            953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   976
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    281
<INCOME-TAX>                                        89
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                192
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      11,446,901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,602,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                   263,000
<INVENTORY>                                    432,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,378,099
<PP&E>                                      44,221,579
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,886,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             127,737,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,951,743
<BONDS>                                     81,686,154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,700
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,338,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               127,737,598
<SALES>                                     12,302,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,302,743
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,939,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (4,600,328)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,152,964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,810,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,810,840
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,810,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.65
        


</TABLE>
No. 11055.

#### The Midland Company *v.*Buell.

Decided November 9, 1909.

Error to Circuit. Court of Washington county.

*Mr. J. A. Gallaher,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Rztfus A. Underwood,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Larry THOMPSON, a/k/a Mark Anthony LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-231.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 22, 1974.

Cause transferred.