alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Raymond, Gabrielle [mailto:graymond@rti.org]  

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 1:04 PM

To: Rosenthal, Steven <rosenthal.steven@epa.gov>; Munoz, Breda <breda@rti.org>

Cc: D'Agostino, Kathleen <dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov>; Liljegren, Jennifer <Liljegren.Jennifer@epa.gov>; Parker,

Barrett <Parker.Barrett@epa.gov>; Mulrine, Phil <Mulrine.Phil@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: taconite petitions for review; UPL equations

Hello,

The consensus between Barrett, Breda, and I is that:  

‐They should use the 720‐average values to set the non‐parametric limit if they are using 720‐average values to meet

compliance.

‐The data format to set a limit should match the data format for compliance.

‐We also do not agree with their statement about removing high values.

“By contrast, if the non‐parametric equation uses individual hourly data to set the standard, the highest 5% are the

peaks in the hourly data set.  The limit is established by excluding the highest 5% of those hourly peaks.”

They are truncating the distribution to remove the high values.

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone:  (919) 541‐7015
-. >
4&2

enumerated by me on the LPH _ day of June, 1880.

Ce | Lez Z

- .s<

- a Seas

ae a nnn nnn tne E se er A
ee...

SCHEDULE I.—Inhabitants in. /zyzcrCakh  _- - in the County of Lice IZ irasac ea., State of hoashen CO tae

lh

#0, If under }

Color—White, W BM ons Chinas
' ag 3 Black, ulatto, Muy Chinese,

\ tei tation.

birthday prior to June 1, 1880,

=

© 2-OMeDy PLS J 4 | 4
. ae) TNT ET ED yt en ee PP ape ee ee TE
ph ON Sk NEEL EE, eR eee ald or > a

Pemilies nambereet fn onder of efeltation

Dwelling houses numbered in acter of

Sex—Male, M.; Female, F.
during the Consus year

| Age at lest

|

year, give mouths in fractions, thus: A.
ot | If bern within the Consus year, give the month,

:
+
S
*
4 ?> ry
vA
5
“°
b 4

ic
2

“— “-..
.
k 4
eo,
Oe
RU SS
‘er 7
enn
ae
_s 4
——
~ a
Boe
;

8
4?
ib
(a
13
iM
, .. 4
a 6
:
’

—
es

ee ~

| Number of months this person has been unemployed

/

60 %0|\A> 4d Uy 0 Gee

> *
@
Sie

:

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

7

Zz ho |’
i |

| SS
:
t
IS

_-
TT

Go 23, an affirmative mark only will be used—thus / , except in the case of divorced persons, coliamm 11. when the letter “D” ie to be nerd.
an affirmative answer has been given either tu question 10 or to questivu 11. SEAS
a gainful occupation bas been reported in column 13.
month may be used, as Jan., Apr., Dec. ae Mi :

~~ s
**Exhibit 32.1.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the“Company”) certify that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: February 22, 2008
From: Beaver, Melinda To: Kordzi, Joe ; Lorang, Phil Subject: FW: Materials for the February 10 Pre-call for the Meeting on Regional Haze in RTP Date: Thursday, October 08, 2015 4:20:27 PM Attachments: Agenda for February 10 pre-meeting conference call.docx Invited March 3-4 attendees as of Feb 3 2015.pdf Draft Agenda for the EPA-FLM-RPO-States meeting on regional haze program changes (to RPO state & tribal reps).docx Topics III-IV Questions - New Guidance on Regional Haze (to RPO state & tribal reps).docx Explanation of Pre-meeting materials for the EPA-FLM-RPO-States-Tribes meeting on regional haze program changes (Feb. 3 to RPO state & tribal reps).docx Topics I II Questions - Rulemaking on RHR Revisions (to RPOs states & tribes).docx

Hi Joe,

I’m not exactly sure what you’re looking for (sorry if I missed an email), but I have this email in my inbox that Phil sent on Feb 3? I believe I sent the Feb 17 since Phil was on leave?

Let me know if you’re looking for something different, Melinda

From: Lorang, Phil Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 5:10 PM To: djohnson@westar.org; hornback@metro4-sesarm.org; Theresa Pella; Wood, Anna; Rob Kaleel; dfoerter@otcair.org; swierman@marama.org; tmoore@westar.org; Bob Lebens Cc: Jones, Rhea; Beaver, Melinda; Viswanathan, Krishna; Kelly, Bob; Terry, Sara; Tonnesen, Gail; Morales, Monica; McKaughan, Colleen; Webb, Thomas; Ruvo, Richard; Lakin, Matt; Timin, Brian; Misenis, Chris Subject: Materials for the February 10 Pre-call for the Meeting on Regional Haze in RTP

Greetings,

Here are the materials to help us during our conference call on Tuesday, February 10, from 12:30-2 pm. The 2-page “Explanation” is a good place to start reading.

We in EPA are expecting the RPO directors to distribute these materials to state/local people who need them, beyond the people addressed in this email. EPA-OAQPS will distribute the materials to the FLM staff who will be joining the conference call. EPA does not plan to post these on any of our websites.

Phil Lorang, Senior Policy Advisor Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS 919-541-5463
Table 2.  Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates, by Area:  Fourth Quarter 1998



                                    Rental vacancy rates


                          Fourth       Fourth      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           1998         1997       1998 rate   difference


United States..........         7.8          7.7          0.2          0.3

  Inside MAs...........         7.5          7.5          0.2          0.3
    In central cities..         8.0          7.9          0.3          0.4
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         6.9          7.1          0.3          0.4
  Outside MAs..........         9.3          8.6          0.5          0.7

 Northeast.............         6.1          6.9          0.4          0.6
 Midwest...............         8.0          7.3          0.4          0.6
 South.................         9.5          9.3          0.3          0.5
 West..................         6.6          6.5          0.3          0.5



                                    Homeowner vacancy rates


                          Fourth       Fourth      Standard     Standard
Area                      quarter      quarter     error on     error on
                           1998         1997       1998 rate   difference


United States..........         1.8          1.7          0.1          0.1

  Inside MAs...........         1.7          1.6          0.1          0.1
    In central cities..         2.3          2.0          0.1          0.2
    Not in central cities
    (suburbs)..........         1.5          1.4          0.1          0.1
  Outside MAs..........         1.9          2.2          0.1          0.2

 Northeast.............         1.3          1.6          0.1          0.2
 Midwest...............         1.5          1.3          0.1          0.2
 South.................         2.1          2.1          0.1          0.1
 West..................         1.8          1.7          0.1          0.2
#### In re Estate of Gerold V. DAUGHERTY, Deceased. Pauline P. SNYDER, Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Gerold V. Daugherty, Deceased, Appellant, v. Carl R. DAUGHERTY et al., Appellees.

No. 72-161.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 16, 1972.

Appeal from County Judges’ Court, Palm Beach County; Paul T. Douglas, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-44399, 33-80993, 33-80995, 33-91506 and 33-93148) on Form S-8 and the
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-03351, 333-03766 and 333-58531) on Form S-3 of
Cox Communications, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 1999, on the
consolidated financial statements of Cox Communications PCS, L.P. and
subsidiaries for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cox Communications, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1998.


                                            /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
                                           --------------------------------

Kansas City, Missouri
March 24, 1999
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Nidhi H. Andalon, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
  (1)           the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
  (2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: October 28, 2010


/s/  NIDHI H. ANDALONNidhi H. Andalon,

Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Wehereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ourreport dated February 3, 2005 on the consolidated balance sheets of LoganCounty BancShares, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the relatedconsolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cashflows for years then ended.  Said reportappears in this Form 10-K under Part II, Item 8.

 
| /s/  S. R. Snodgrass, A.C. |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|
|                       |   |
| Wheeling,  West Virginia   |   |
| March  28, 2005            |   |

 

----
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00376

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

00376\00376_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00376\00376_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00376\00376_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00376\00376_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00376\00376_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00376\00376_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00376\00376_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 00376\Follow up\AEP Oklaunion Followup Responses.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

x 00376\Follow up\EPA OK ICR review ques.doc Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

x 00376\Follow up\Steam Electric Questionnaire Follow Up Questions for Oklaunion.rtf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

00376\Supporting Documents\AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00376\Supporting Documents\AEP OK 00376 A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00376\Supporting Documents\AEP OK 00376 A5-3 WB Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00376\Supporting Documents\AEP OK 00376 C 3-23 Bottom Ash Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00376\Supporting Documents\AEP OK 00376 C3-23 Conveyor Drawing.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00376\Supporting Documents\AEP OK 00376 C3-23 Conveyor Specifications.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00376\Supporting Documents\AEP OK 00376 Cont. Tables A-4 & A-5.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00376\Supporting Documents\AEP OK 00376 D3-1 block diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00376\Supporting Documents\AEP OK 00376 D4-5 Dredged Material.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00376\Supporting Documents\SPD 11, 12, A costs.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00376\00376_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00376\00376_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Dolores CARTER et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN MUTUAL INS. CO. et al., Appellees.

No. 72-547.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 27, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-80993, 33-80995, 33-91506 and 33-93148) on Form S-8 and the
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-03351 and 333-03766) on Form S-3 of Cox
Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 1997 on the consolidated
financial statements of Sprint Spectrum Holding Company, L.P. and subsidiaries
(which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
referring to the developmental stage of Sprint Spectrum Holding Company, L.P.
and subsidiaries) for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
1996, for the period from October 24, 1994 (date of inception) to December 31,
1994 and for the cumulative period from October 24, 1994 (date of inception) to
December 31, 1996 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cox
Communications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
March 25, 1997
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Coates International, Ltd. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”),
I, George J. Coates, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







August
      13, 2008
              By:
              /s/ George
      J. CoatesGeorge
      J. CoatesPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Centenary International Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Hector A. Patron Costas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of the
            operation of the Company.



--------------------------------
Hector A. Patron Costas
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
March 2, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by ss.906 has been provided
to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       21
October 20, 2015 

Federal Aviation Administration 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Len Davis 

Telephone: (630) 406-7990 x202

Mobile: (630) 301-0090 

Email: ldavis@purei.com

Website: www.purei.com

Company: Pure Imagination, Inc 

Address: 12 E Wilson St., Batavia, IL 60510 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2925

Re: Additional information to comply with the requirements of § 11.81(d) in order to 

process our petition for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 

CFR). 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Granting the petitioner an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 

CFR) would have a positive impact on the public as a whole in the following ways:

1. Granting an exemption would allow the public to be able to legally acquire aerial 

photography and videography to assist in educational, corporate, sales, promotional, 

training and instructional purposes safely, efficiently, and economically.

2. The petitioner would be able to provide live video feed to assist with search and 

rescue operations in cases of an emergency or natural disaster only when the local 

authorities or government has requested it by contract or donation.

3. The petitioner would be able to train persons individually or belonging to both private 

and/or public organizations to increase awareness and improve safety for current and 

future UAS operations within the NAS.

4. Providing this service at a lower cost and ensuring operational and legal safety to the 

individuals of the United States has a positive impact. Using small UAS, we will pose no 

threat to the public given its small size and lack of combustible fuel when compared to 

larger manned aircraft. Our UAS will minimize ecological damage and promote 

economic growth by providing a service to to our clients.

5. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography 

missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during 

the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations.
6. Aerial video/photography with the small UAS will greatly benefit the public by 

drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during traditional 

aerial video and still photography flight operations.

Respectfully submitted, 

Len Davis
EXHIBIT
31.2  CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  I, David G. Zahka, certify
that:  1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of Talk America Holdings, Inc.;  2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;  4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:  a)         designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b)   
 [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5,
2003)]  c)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)         all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and  b)
        any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  April
25, 2005  /s/ David G.
Zahka David G. Zahka