alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE COOPER
LIFE SCIENCES, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER
31,  1995 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                         OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                                  341
<SECURITIES>                                         13,645
<RECEIVABLES>                                           194
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
<PP&E>                                                   91
<DEPRECIATION>                                           62
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       19,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                           16,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         19,102
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       (325)
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      1,132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       1,173
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        2,823
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1,173
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .53
<FN>
See the financial statements for an unclassified balance sheet.
        



</TABLE>
#### WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., and Eldede Corporation, Appellants, v. Ernest J. WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. P-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 16, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70044-70045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27981]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

[Public Notice: 2014-6009]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 14-01 Small Business Exporter Survey.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The small business exporter survey seeks to obtain feedback from 
customers on trade credit insurance policy purchases made in a Fiscal 
Year. This survey will help Ex-Im Bank better understand small business 
customers' perspectives on the bank's products, the level of service 
provided, and how Ex-Im Bank's assistance impacts their small business. 
The objective is to identify possible service improvements and better 
understand small business owners' experiences working with Ex-Im Bank.
    The survey can be reviewed at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/SBCustomerSurvey s/
SBCustomerSurvey.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before January 21, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV or by mail to Stephanie Thum, Export-Import Bank of 
the United States, 811 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 14-01 Small Business Exporter Survey.
    OMB Number: 3048-XXXX.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information requested enables Ex-Im Bank to 
identify possible service improvements to the benefit of small business 
exporters.
    The number of respondents: 1,808.
    Estimated time per respondents: 10 minutes.
    The frequency of response: Annually.
    Annual hour burden: 301.3 total hours.

Government Expenses

    Reviewing time per response: 5 minutes.

[[Page 70045]]

    Responses per year: 1,808.
    Reviewing time per year: 150.7 hours.
    Average Wages per hour: $42.50.
    Average cost per year:
    (time * wages) $6,403.
    Benefits and overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $7,684.

Kalesha Malloy,
Agency Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-27981 Filed 11-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.2


                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                    NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
                                                                                ---------------------------------------------
                                                                                  NUMBER          PERCENT        EQUIVALENT
                                                                                 OF SHARES      OUTSTANDING        SHARES
                                                                                 ---------      -----------      ----------
<S>                                                                            <C>              <C>             <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                                           2,300,000         100.00%         2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                                        2,488,572          91.14%         2,267,966
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                                     15,310,943         100.00%        15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                                                   11,242,857         100.00%        11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                                                    4,323,874         100.00%         4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                                                     6,000,000         100.00%         6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                                                   (6,588)        100.00%            (6,588)
   March 2000 Debt Swap                                                           3,789,715          74.82%         2,835,371
   Canadian Transaction                                                             714,286          88.69%           633,473
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                                       169,504          88.38%           149,809
   Warrants Exercised                                                               134,737          97.56%           131,456
                                                                                -----------                      ------------
                                                                                 46,467,900                        45,189,161

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                                45,189,161

NET LOSS                                                                                                         $(76,368,000)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                                                     ($1.69)
                                                                                                                 =============
</Table>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6030

WILLIAM T. SIMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, Southampton Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.

(CA-99-578-AM)

Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 2, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William T. Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

December 6, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on December 14, 1999. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we

take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

William T. Sims seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Sims v. Warden, No. CA-99-578-AM

(E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 1999).* We deny Sims’ request to order the

Virginia Department of Corrections to transfer him to another

facility. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             508
<SECURITIES>                                     1,006
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                        99
<INVENTORY>                                      1,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,200
<PP&E>                                             853
<DEPRECIATION>                                     708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,942
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,421
<SALES>                                         40,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,645
<CGS>                                           38,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (397)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    46
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    646
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                643
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       643
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Request for public comments.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from the Town of Southbridge, MA, to change the land use from aeronautical to non-aeronautical use for 8.5 acres of land for revenue generation. The parcel is located southwest of the runway and terminal building and will be used for a solar farm. The land lease rate is based on an appraisal and the annual lease will be placed in the airport's operations and maintenance account.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before August 23, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

You may send comments using any of the following methods:
      -  Federal eRulemaking Portal:                          Go to                          http://www.regulations.gov,                          and follow the instructions on providing comments.                    
      -  Fax:                          202-493-2251.                    
      -  Mail:                          U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W 12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.                    
      -  Hand Delivery:                          Deliver to mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.                    

                        Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents by contacting the FAA at the address listed under                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and Land Use Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration New England Region Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803. Telephone: 781-238-7618.

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 16, 2018.

Gail B. Lattrell,

Director (Acting), ANE-600.

[FR Doc. 2018-15831 Filed 7-23-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
page Noe 82

Sopanisor's Dist, No.2.

SCHEDULE I. —Tnbabitants i in ae

Jin9.1/1880, will be OMITTED. ‘Members of Famiiles/whio have
amnion Dit No ZEA, Noth C-—Gueetlons Nos: 19,14, 82 ana 22 lare otto be ake in renpoct Lo pore

en

1886, wil/be INCLUBED.

|, Children BORN SINCE

uly. eo)

(478:

i

SSG

i

“| A a

Historic census records are mai

intained and ré

Visit http://www. archives.gov for more

wer

CE Tiebaczal

‘eleased by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census

information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Bureau.

iran
‘ola

bile.

Uheoge

rae,

Leveiph ze

ye WAR ZZ

Yeas) |p| || a2

deny 71 fi

Serle] Te | Oba. Chen 5
sag ht | Boron | | P22. |
7 Wa Tiegaveca—|\ 1
: ¢ 7 i :
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Richard G. Chleboski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Evergreen Solar, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2003

                                            /s/ Richard G. Chleboski

                                            --------------------------------

                                            Richard G. Chleboski

                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### KOOY et al. v. VAN WINKLE et al.

No. 6150.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1937.

Bernard Feinberg and Victor Green-burg, both of Passaic, N. J., for appellants.

Wm. A. Sumner, of Paterson, N. J., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the bankruptcy case of Lambertus C. Bobbink in the court below, Peter and Agnes Kooy presented a claim to have themselves declared beneficiaries in an alleged trust fund and so to have preference over general creditors of the bankrupt. The matter was referred to a referee, who reported against them and his report was approved .by the court. Thereupon petitioners took this appeal. On consideration had, we are of opinion the court committed no error.

The facts are that Peter Kooy had worked for the bankrupt, who was a florist, since 1911. In 1923 the latter suggested to Kooy that he leave each year a. certain portion of his wages and he would thus have something for his old age. To this Kooy agreed and at the date of the bankruptcy Kooy was credited with $6,500. Upon the sums retained Kooy was regularly paid 6 per cent, interest. In 1931 the bankrupt gave Kooy a paper as follows:

> “July 1, 1931.

> “Received from Peter Kooy or Irene Agnes Kooy, his wife, payable to the survivor, Six Thousand ' Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($6,500.00) to be used by us, and to be considered as an Employee’s Saving Fund, interest to be allowed at the rate of *6%*payable quarterly on the first-day of January, April, July and October. The maker, Bobbink & Atkins, reserves the right to demand six (6) months notice ’ by the depositor, Peter Kooy or Irene Agnes Kooy, of their desire to withdraw this money and also reserves the right to repay this loan on any interest date on thirty (30) days written notice.

> “Bobbink & Atkins

> “Per L. C. Bobbink”

The referee held this did not constitute a trust. We agree therewith. The paper evidences not a trust, but an interest-bearing loan, viz., “($6,500) to be used by us.” It describes the signatories as “the maker.” It describes Kooy as “the depositor.” It characterizes the transaction as “this loan.” In point of fact, no trust fund was segregated, established, or entered on the books of Bobbink,

In view of these facts, it is clear that the money, while styled “an employee’s Saving Fund,” was in fact an interest-bearing loan and, therefore, Kooy is an unsecured creditor. So regarding, the decree below is affirmed.