alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.2


  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

  SERIES C COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT

  	This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SERIES C COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of October 6, 2022, by and between Neptune Wellness Solutions Inc., a Quebec corporation (the “Company”), and Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. (the “Holder”).

  	WHEREAS, the Holder is the holder of a Series C Common Stock Purchase Warrant, issued as of June 23, 2022, to purchase up to 972,763 common shares of the Company, without par value (the “Original Warrant”); 

  	WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5(l) of the Original Warrant, the Original Warrant may be modified or amended or the provisions thereof waived with the written consent of the Company and the Holder; and

  	WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to amend the Original Warrant as set forth in this Amendment.

  	NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company and the Holder hereby agree as follows:

  1.Amendment to “Termination Date” Defined Term. The defined term “Termination Date” is hereby defined to mean June 23, 2029.


  2.No Further Amendment. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Original Warrant remains unaltered and shall remain in full force and effect.


  3.Jurisdiction. All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Amendment shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of that certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of June 21, 2022 between the Company and the Holder.


  4.Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. Signatures delivered by facsimile, electronic mail (including as a PDF file) or other transmission method shall be deemed to be original signatures, shall be valid and binding, and, upon delivery, shall constitute due execution of this Amendment.


  (Signature page follows)

   

   

  NAI-1533461640v2

  

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Company and the Holder has caused this Amendment to be executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above indicated.

   

  COMPANY

  NEPTUNE WELLNESS SOLUTIONS INC.

   

  By:  /s/ Raymond Silcock	

  Name: 	Raymond Silcock

  Title: 	Chief Financial Officer

   

   

  HOLDER

  ARMISTICE CAPITAL MASTER FUND LTD.

   

  By:  /s/ Steven Boyd	

  Name: 	Steven Boyd

  Title: 	CIO of Armistice Capital, LLC, the Investment Manager	

   

   

  	2

   

  NAI-1533461640v2
~“ Qed 6 © rh @ @ | a & a BRR RER RS

. Fe
\ \\ \

ARTE Pome
He HA

y fe Be
YN v He \

val BUDE FFREU EEE PRESSE SEEEPENEREL
W/MBGCESEEEESEC EEE EECRSESEREESERCE

La NSN SN
\ Wc
. ! \F .
\\s

| "UONWISLA JO Z9ps0 A
oy) G} perequinu
—soenoy-3ureag y gg

wae wee re eeezeeeseehtaga TETETE TERR REBAR

NIYVVA eee 9

A at Pd le a ll “a A a “a

7
CZZ, a

a
i
‘ol

Vator or Estates Owwezp.

222022 OZ Za
day of

tJé ZSLLAR Z
ayer Fe
2

not the U.S. Census Bureau.
available records like the one shown here.

Ae on the

the National Archives and Records Administration,

http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly

>
2
Ze)
d
v)
OY
&
®
toe
=
=
OF
=
d
=
gas
l=
©
=
a
thos
OF
”)
a
thes
O
rz)
®
thos
”
=.
v)
=
d
rz)
oO
=
O
hem!
2X
al

enumerated
Visit

place of abode on the first day of June,

The name of every person whose usual
1860, was in this family.

S?,
SCHEDULE 1—Free Inhabitants:in Z&

ee
Post Office

xen OE wd oA A a a

ité< pa a fe - a a ota) a
#### Anthony John BRUNO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 42312.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 6, 1972.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender'and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt and Enoch J. Whitney, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

DREW, Justice,

Retired:

The trial court in this case overruled defendant’s attack upon F.S.A. *790.01,*subsection (2), on the ground that the same was unconstitutionally vague and uncertain in its description of the condemned act. We find no merit whatever in this contention. Wayne Zachary v. State, Fla., 269 So. 669, opinion filed November 22, 1972, and authorities therein cited. We have also examined the other assignments of error and find that they, too, are without merit.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. *].,*and ERVIN, CARLTON, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### MARINA LAND COMPANY, Appellant, v. GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC., and Wilbur Brantley, d/b/a Wilbur Brantley Realty, Appellees.

No. 72-668.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 28, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Monroe BRANNEN, Sheriff of Polk County, Florida, et al., Petitioners, v. R. Craig LEON, a minor, by his father and next friend, Andrew J. Leon, and Andrew J. Leon, Individually, et al., Respondents.

No. 44039.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 25, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 278 So.2d 687.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Richard Carter NEWMAN, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 71-175.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 15, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### CITY OF MIAMI v. SCHONFELD.

No. 36498.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 197 So.2d 559.
Fh fe TA de eo

ee ee Si
J—224.
. . ‘PWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES.

2 oo D 7 : x } 7. : = : Sant Supervisor's District No. = hs =~ ‘Sheet - =
an, Perl Le SCHEDULE No. 1. POPULATION. — ! 70 la ale

Ueamearatian District No.

Yip 2 LAX i La ree —__—— Name of Institution, x sone

= —

or other civil divicion, OH may be. See instructions]
4 FU

Name of incorporated city, town, or village, within the above-named division, OTT te Co Ss Aare Ward of city,

eee

Township or other division of county——————

7 ao WE
Enumerated by me on the a) AaaT Rae __— day of June, 1900, -—-——--- Eno

LOCATION. NAME RELATION. PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. NATIVITY. . OCCUPATION, TRADE, OR EDUCATION. OWNERSHIP OF HOME.
PROFESSION ) 7

z

te

of each person TEN YEARS of age
and over.

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If born in the United
States, give the State or Terrilory; if of foreign birth, give the Country only.

— <2.

(in

=

Number of family, in the
omer of visitation

IN CITIES. abode on June 1, 1900, was BIETH.

in this family.

married,
(vorved

e man

Nutobor of these children

livlig.

Number of dwoelling-

——

Enter surname first, then the given name and Relationship of each

middle initial, if any, person to the head

of each person whose place of | DATE OF
of the famlfly. |

f how many

children,

Place of birth of this Place of birth of Farner Place of birth of Moruze
Prnson. of this person. of this person.

employed,

IncLupE avery person living on June 1, 1900,
Ott children born since June 1, 1900.

house, in the order of
Number of years tn tho
Owned free or mortga,
Number of farm schedule.

Year of Immigration to
the United States
United Statea,

Age at last birthday,
Number of years inoreled,
Months not
Owned or rented,
Farm or honse,

visitation.
Whethor sing
widowed, or

Mother o

Tlouse Namber, |
Attended school
Can write,

Can speak English

Color or rice,

ts
a

~ ( } ta fl }

Historic census records are maintained and released by

the National Archives and Records Administration, ee Ae on Latte SA.

not the U.S. Census Bureau. ASK Lek

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly

available records like the one shown here.
, |e d Pa > ee ee J s

f

" C4 . J
Z — 7 “Fj / fre SLAVE pi ters : ;
Lk ne PR EE at SN J. I ee GE IO Eee iS }
LR LSTA GAZT, IPF 92D 75 TW | \te7 © : eg
— et GF . ee ip \Af se . & s, df ‘ i id ) 4 £ ¢<- y A A a i jtdbacd

a fo
Ses ae

ee “4A
eee Pe
s f 7 v4
YM tet/)ca4 Vey

1 ‘

Don
as ts

ee so aa ine a / LFS
(2 Baad th. {rz gh(flesr Lh, id! po

r) 4

—
f ’

fs
- P

L#

j F J P, ty
” AAA Nett LOtAC Ps ‘oP ‘ Wi 4 ’ Vf | 4

ee ew a ee ewe SS ee eee oe

7 ‘ (Ea
Mi Za
~

Pa

tie

shal
a Ae ae
ee * =—— . 4 mas <
re EG.
{ Af

iS ae

Sccheieeetemeas ieee

I /
el ad ee (0-7 ‘

4, ood

“%

ZEAL OAL NA hi d\

eee ee eee
Z

letaced Vktn-fize, |. ee
: i ‘ 2 wt
f % J. he Laer) JAS Seni
A, 4 MN Ke
732
/}

Pte :
jee Uh
#### Felix Wheeler JONES, Appellant, v. Robert Wayne KLOHR and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. S-476.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 21, 1974.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### LERNER SHOPS v. HICKS.

No. 35572.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           907
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                     120
<INVENTORY>                                    7,156
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10,737
<PP&E>                                         1,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,325
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          12
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12,680
<SALES>                                        2,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,835
<CGS>                                          2,075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,198)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.27


</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1420 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for transparency of 

payments made from the Judgment Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for 

transparency of payments made from the Judgment Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Judgment Fund 

5 Transparency Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JUDGMENT FUND TRANSPARENCY. 

7 (a) TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT.—Section 1304 

8 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1420 IS

1 ‘‘(d) Unless the disclosure of such information is oth2 erwise prohibited by law or court order, the Secretary of 

3 the Treasury shall make available to the public on a 

4 website, as soon as practicable, but not later than 30 days 

5 after the date on which a payment under this section is 

6 tendered, the following information with regard to that 

7 payment: 

8 ‘‘(1) The name of the specific agency or entity 

9 whose actions gave rise to the claim or judgment. 

10 ‘‘(2) The name of the plaintiff or claimant. 

11 ‘‘(3) The name of counsel for the plaintiff or 

12 claimant. 

13 ‘‘(4) The amount paid representing principal li14 ability, and any amounts paid representing any an15 cillary liability, including attorney fees, costs, and 

16 interest. 

17 ‘‘(5) A brief description of the facts that gave 

18 rise to the claim. 

19 ‘‘(6) The name of the agency that submitted 

20 the claim.’’. 

21 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary of the Treas22 ury shall implement the amendment made by this section 

23 beginning not later than 60 days after the date of enact24 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Filed 9/21/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2010 ND 178

In the Interest of B.B., a minor child

Grand Forks County 

Social Services Center, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

B.J.F., Mother, Respondent

and

S.L.B., Father, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20100161

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Joel D. Medd, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant State’s Attorney, and Abby Siewart, appearing under the Rule on the Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, 124 South 4th Street, P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, ND 58206-5607, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Rebecca Heigaard-McGurran, Grand Forks Public Defender Office, 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 101, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Interest of B.B.

No. 20100161

Per Curiam.

[¶1]S.L.B. appeals from a district court judgment terminating his parental rights to B.B., a minor child, asserting compelling reasons existed to proceed with a guardianship.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom
#### James J. KOEPPEL, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Robert Koeppel, and Robert Koeppel, individually, Appellants, v. CITY STORES COMPANY, a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, d/b/a Richards Department Stores, Appellees. James J. KOEPPEL, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Robert Koeppel, and Robert Koeppel, individually, Appellants, v. OTIS ELEVATOR CO., a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, Appellee.

Nos. 70-657, 70-658.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

906 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
        The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
        November 27, 2006
        
        
        /s/   David H. RochePresident and Chief Executive Officer






/s/  Steven M. CaspersExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---
Document

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT


    This Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (this “Amendment”), is dated as of January 19, 2021. Each capitalized term used but not defined in this Amendment has the meaning given to it in the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Digital Media Solutions Holdings, LLC (the “LLC Agreement”).
RECITALS
    WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.1 of the LLC Agreement, the Blocker Member proposed this Amendment to the Board of Managers of the Company;
WHEREAS, the Board of Managers submitted the Amendment to the Members for approval by written consent;
WHEREAS, the LLC Agreement may be amended with the consent of the Blocker Member and the Consent of the Non-Blocker Members; 
    WHEREAS, this Amendment has been approved by the Blocker Member and the Consent of the Non-Blocker Members; and 
    WHEREAS, in light of the approval of the Blocker Member and the Consent of the Non-Blocker Members, this Amendment may be implemented and reflected in a writing executed solely by the Company, and the Members shall be deemed a party to and bound by this Amendment.
    NOW, THEREFORE, the LLC Agreement has been amended as follows:
1.Amendment to Section 14.1(b)(i) of the LLC Agreement. Section 14.1(b)(i) of the LLC Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the reference therein to “in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors” with “in the sole discretion of a majority of the members of the Board of Directors disinterested in the applicable decision.”
2.Amendment to Section 14.1(b)(ii) of the LLC Agreement. Section 14.1(b)(ii) of the LLC Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the reference therein to “in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors” with “in the sole discretion of a majority of the members of the Board of Directors disinterested in the applicable decision.”
3.Miscellaneous. Except to the extent specifically amended, modified or supplemented by this Amendment, the LLC Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect and this Amendment will be governed by and subject to the terms of the LLC Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.  From and after the date of this Amendment, each reference in the LLC Agreement to “this Agreement,” “hereof,” “hereunder” or words of like import, and all references to the LLC Agreement in any and all agreements, instruments, documents, notes, certificates and other writings of every kind of nature 








(other than in this Amendment or as otherwise expressly provided) will be deemed to mean the LLC Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, whether or not this Amendment is expressly referenced. Section 15.2(a) of the LLC Agreement is incorporated in this Amendment by reference and shall apply to this Amendment mutatis mutandis.
[Signature Pages Follow]


2









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.   
digital media solutions holdings, LLC


By: /s/ Joseph Marinucci
Name: Joseph Marinucci
Title: Chief Executive Officer






[Signature Page to Amendment No. 1]
#### Samuel PEDICAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a municipality, and General Printing Equipment & Supply, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-785.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 4, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 4, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 4.3



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated October 7, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 585 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-266191) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 7, 2022
#### Woodrow W. MEARS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-981.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 20, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1576 

To redesignate the Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System located 

at 10000 Bay Pines Boulevard in Bay Pines, Florida, as the ‘‘C.W. 

Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2013 

Mr. NELSON (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Department of Veterans Affairs 

Healthcare System located at 10000 Bay Pines Boulevard in Bay Pines, Florida, as the ‘‘C.W. Bill Young 

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans 

6 Affairs Healthcare System located at 10000 Bay Pines 

7 Boulevard in Bay Pines, Florida, known as the Bay Pines 

8 VA Healthcare System, shall be known and designated as 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1576 IS

1 the ‘‘C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs 

2 Medical Center’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper or other record of the United 

5 States to the Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare 

6 System referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to 

7 be a reference to the ‘‘C.W. Bill Young Department of 

8 Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Autry Lee JONES v. The Hon. Judge Luther F. COLE, 19th Judicial District Court.

No. 60192.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1977.

In re: Autry Lee Jones applying for Writ of Mandamus

Writ denied. Plaintiff’s request for a trial date is premature in view of the fact that he has not complied with the pretrial procedure contained in Rule VII of the Rules of the 19th Judicial District Court.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted and a trial date ordered fixed. A rule which requires a pre-trial conference before a case can be fixed for trial may be contrary to the intent and purpose of C.C.P. 1551 & 1571.

CALOGERO, J.,

is of the opinion writ should be granted.
EXHIBIT 10.2

    

    

    SCHEDULE A TO EXHIBIT 10.1

    

    

    The following individuals entered into Executive Group Life Split Dollar Plans with The Ohio Valley Bank Company identified below which are identical to
      the Executive Group Life Split Dollar Plan, dated December 31, 2011, between Thomas E. Wiseman and The Ohio Valley Bank Company filed herewith.

    

    

    	
            Name

          	 	
            Date of Agreement

          
	 	 	 
	
            Larry E. Miller II

          	 	
            August 19, 2009

          
	 	 	 
	
            Scott W. Shockey

          	 	
            March 19, 2009
#### REYNOLDS & SMITH, INC., Appellant, v. GILL EQUIPMENT AND AUCTION CO., Appellee.

No. 70-680.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 2, 1971.

M. S. Marlin, Miami, for appellant.

Feibelman, Friedman, Hyman & Brit-ton and William H. Benson, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

*745PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of Old Equity Life Insurance Company v. Levenson, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 50.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of First Investors Financial Services, Inc., (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bennie H. Duck,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| Date: Sept 11, 2006 |                    |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                |                    |
|                | By: /s/ Bennie H. Duck  |   |
|                | Bennie H. Duck          |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----