alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================
                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-Q/A

                                 Amendment No. 1

                 FIRST INVESTORS FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                   Texas                               76-046508
        (State or other jurisdiction of    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
               Incorporation)

               675 Bering Drive, Suite 710
                    Houston, Texas                       77057
        (Address of principal executive offices)       (Zip Code)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (713) 977-2600

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes [X] No [ ].

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

               Class                               Shares Outstanding at
                                                     August 30, 1996

    Common Stock - $.001 par value                      5,566,669

================================================================================
<PAGE>

THIS FORM 10-Q/A HAS BEEN FILED TO COMPLY WITH ITEM 601(C) OF REGULATION S-K
WHICH REQUIRES A FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE TO BE SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT 27 WITH ANY
ELECTRONIC FILING.

                                     PART II

                                Other Information

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

        (a)    27     Financial Data Schedule


                                   SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                            First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc.
                                            (Registrant)


Date:  December 13, 1996            By: /s/ BENNIE H. DUCK
                                            Bennie H. Duck
                                            Secretary, Treasurer and Chief 
                                            Financial Officer 
                                            (Principal Executive, Financial and 
                                            Accounting Officer)
— a
Budget Hurcay No. 4) aaa,
is DATR SUERET STARTAD

This ing try (5 authorteed t » w ree 6 r ivi

co | < yy Act of Ooms % & Ma; 8. Om *) wt a sort be ty
FIDEN IA aad — Mion furnished is eOOOMW ban) eonditen! ) ts ~ we ; Dee | “ Bh oo mnet be ts OS PTs

mod 4 Oat uot Yhe Census TOPPA. Cannes by tated ie hong

N | > ted f af

» Vowl@adion, Or re SUsal jad

g. EN MERA TOR'S MUNATUR

FORM ia)
U. §. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

; Pp 1 BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
1950 CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING

SES LSE RE eee

FOR ALL PERSONS

FOR PERS }
LRSONS TARS , ; .

| I4 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER
he Wh ; b 7 :
old low hat State or foreign f - What at or Ot ri 4 at bo : a
was mar counts was he born in? | +2. was ' tm it nit toms” | Paral pers | :
wae mar. this Did this ié tans ‘ f all other per a ml
he thee Cn : Ie he person person Te
ie som ot natu doing de any

ral- most of | WOrk at
per- he

birth- | diver. :
h ized? last all last 5
SOR didn’t

Gay ce d,
4¢ pa sisting ‘ Py week— week, not look.
cpa | wats work counting |). work
er } ing, were for last
‘ keeping | “round Pings
coees
he

have
a job

or

How

Whe :
at kind of work was he | What kind of business or

Was
: Even doing?
industry wag he working in?

this theagh

. ?
the ween!
:

never
a house
. . or

SO Me

puse?

thing

else?
Dusi-

¥k.I
ness?

‘ ,

etatege ss LEAVE BLANK
t -

LINE NUMBER

rt
8 >t,

pid HT
Bt etre PPO, We ) i >
lee: ee - tae “Le Mgr ot) Fe

+o ey ae es

' aK
Oues,
i stLow

Lae << IG OS nea pr 4

4 VA , 4
L < ae | cha dlr tw J “4g }

tatla , J 4
ct Aton

PRA 4 at. Aa aim

a Fi
,

24 A i
of ee ee ee ee,

ee "8 A
,,
A Oak aw Ss

, a
ay eee
-

‘4 a a .
. a eat a.
ra — MMe Fthihapmesh

PPA AMiam. aap ft -
f an St ‘ct «

Cot ' ,
= A aghles > Mk sthadgroca

Otek ce PALA 4 4 4 ;
f ala ee

+

hack » ta yg cena
. LI Aw (Ut44 L. - - 4
4 on L FAL (24

released by

.

Historic census records are maintained and
the National Archives and Records Administration,

not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

ot BMX Le .
Ad

| - a
HOUSEHOLD CONTINUE / saacre 3 : ,
4 _ r = J Ot dd &

I} . ira « » i
iE QUESTIONS BELOW ARE Fr R PERSONS LIS? D> ON (MPI
‘ | . "LE LINES

AGI
FOP Prenrc ; ,
FOR PERSONS fi YEARS OF AGE AND OVER

2 eee
ORE nao BE ee

sessional
FOR DISTRICT oF
Ni cio ter mo Tine. re 4
A LIMA Pfs shen er ae ‘ me
' : on we : a Hew many hil af '
“rem Tat she eves
ferne, not comting stillbirths ?

ir 4 None

beta d
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Steven RosenbergSteven Rosenberg,Chief Executive Officer, Presidentand Chief Financial OfficerMarch 24, 2011
#### Homer Gerald OUTLAW et al. v. BITUMINOUS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 62418.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Bituminous Casualty Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to *1294the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 357 So.2d 1350.

Writ denied.

DIXON, CALOGERO, MARCUS and DENNIS, JJ.,

concur in the denial but note that it was error for the Court of Appeal to refuse to consider defendant’s objection to the jury charges, made by agreement after jury had retired. Such agreement does not conflict with CCP 1793. Nevertheless full review by Court of Appeal makes the error harmless.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1957
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               81
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1957
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   109
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.19)
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles B. HITT, Jr., by and through his father and next friend, Charles B. Hitt, Sr., and Charles B. Hitt, Sr., Individually, Appellant, v. DOCTORS’ HOSPITAL, a medical institution at Coral Gables, Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-799.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 19, 1968.

Donald F. March, Miami, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Musachia v. Terry, Fla.App.1962, 140 So.2d 605; Goldstein v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Fla.App.1962, 142 So.2d 115; Parmerter v. Osteopathic General Hospital, Fla.App. 1967, 196 So.2d 505; Spencer v. Florida-Georgia Tractor Company, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 466.
TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES. A

et em mses

: “ | SCHEDULE No. {—POPUL ATION. ( Supervisor's District No. ——n 3) Sheet No.

| ) é ; Ueokaration District No. .37 j es ees
Township or other division of county_.._.__ NE bin be of a : CS cum Name of Instituti x
LULsLOn of county —.._______ A JUNHO SA J FWY | —___... Name stitution, -

[Insert ndiné of 1 wnship, town, precinct, district, or other civil division, as the case may be. Bee instructions |

7----- - -+-+-+-
-_—
—=

Name_of incorporated city, town, or village, within the above-named division,
nana nnen ooeaeeeereeeeeeeeemmeee es errors WRI OF one

see at as a, oe
Enumerated by me on the ER day of June, 1900, _tharla. OY. Yoana

~-.-........_., Enumerator. -
An

LOCATION. NAME RELATION. PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. NATIVITY CITIZENSHIP
—— ‘ : NSHIP. | OCCUPATION, TRADE, © 1c
mv cemme [5 [2 | sgch,perem whens, pce of waa 1 Th Poh re mae eho emit, Bh tae an | Porson |__| nr eee
fi se in this family. BIBTH. F be a EE se 3 =. be of each person TEN YEARS of age |= z S
ffed,| 28] ommimammeresee [meters | B |e | fi| pate {jit [3
“t4 ‘ ‘ of the family. 5 es ioe - Be | s = |: +s ]2/5
i] i af 4) Musca sea 0 tanadl ined 6a) neil ili cae kt Ooce 2 ae ee
ala | 2|a|_ 5 le | # BY] 3 | ee} | E | Elalalal| d
1 2 3 4 s | 6 7 8 | 9 13 14 —_—|_= — Ee cS LS éysisje] x
; — at as 15 16 17 18 19 | 20 21 @: 2
a | / —_—_—_—
a ae mw soy |
nt ies | a ld aR ae | Abreu [20 12| fo | Fearne
bal 0 Pe | Fw Yok |_| Bromolr __|o| [yu lo bw 14) lal
j 2 2 e {
P| Bolle |e7e 123) oe | Ow iv |
ar Ly le | haw | spe | | 8 | A | |
6 | Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.
is ee ee ee (@) 1 ef 7 . .
g | laa r@ = ie Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.
Z ee
9
a WO ke W505 27 | nw isin O97
. LW aw Gow lon 118 | |
‘San ica in ies ete Ge
19 We\m| Indy eX Zelovl/s| | | Gywtan, | wGst | om, arp | | | | ow... vow UU Pte
CS aug |t 6) | 32) tw
13 Ww | |
| lao | Geawu | 1687/3 &
14 | ow |0 2 er
sa W | Ae | e4A- BH| BIE ~~
|
; Babe \/5 9713 |S
* CLA | MP ' dude 1899 760m yo) | 1 Oe
= OP | hs eles 37 aw is] ¢
W mo| metr | Sf 60 37 &
9 hE ET CE goer
: kl: le St draw ee 3y| §\ | | | a
r INS oop |lfes $ ’ Yon bt Koby
21 Pr a. wy, | Far 4 Sea ue Sobek) 3
TA | & ,
22 can ee - , — Tora aber Oo
yy’ | I/ | s bhp,
SP pap ae. | Bow, >| wo, mae 68'BL || | _Sptllr |e
. W | Mb He Yb 1
‘s Wr cS fens. |i 8e| 48) mu) Bx] o
a | ime we | bee) 33) 8) |
é + |’ |mdl|ahr |aaslye] | | | | Kew Yrk | UbkGok QuyYrr \ \ | |) Ah ZL).
S Wr || Seb | 686 | wo | f8
: LWP) St | Mar 65! 35\ ad) (3 | 7 |
: We nw | Sek | 16 96 14| &
| up 183%) 53 Wh 18
31 a a | oi lie’ c — 7
i nae lydal Ldduor | Berar \w no (Lino |/§723| 6
1 (— wut, Hh Azeea db Bien YY
S20 W| | noe be 33 |e OZ, ,

—— | 7 . TRAE j | le
Sole. (862 3) als 1% | BA gland 1g lav lees | a

\& Ay
hrudh DA
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1 
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                                                                
                                                                                
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated November 11, 1996 included in this Form 10-K for the fiscal year   
ended September 27, 1996 into the Company's previously filed Registration       
Statements on Form S-8, Registration Nos. 33-11818, 33-30879, 33-33329,         
33-44002, and 33-57825, and on Form S-3, Registration Nos. 33-47564, 33-52587   
and 33-64259.                                                                   
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP   
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania                                                      
   November 19, 1996
#### Roderick JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2635.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 3, 1969.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, and Edward G. Helvenston, Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant questions the denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule One (now Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.) on the ground that the record does not show that the trial court informed him as to the consequences of his guilty plea.

After carefully reviewing the record, in light of the law applicable at the time Johnson entered the guilty plea, we find his argument to be without merit.

Affirmed on the authority of Reddick v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 340.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
# Request for Tier 3 Exemptions

The Skylift team developed the first electric conversion kits for helicopters and built the heavy

- lift drone that carried Lady Gaga at her concerts. Our IP is focused on an innovative rotor system which provides a sustainable performance advantage over competitors us ing the same batteries or motors. Our tricopter designs are based on decades of experience with the benefits and risks of helicopters. We are requesting exemption from the 55

- lb. MTOW (Part 107) and external load limitations (Part 133) under 14 CFR.

Our p rototypes are based on the proven track record of full

- size helicopters and RC helicopters, however, we have added additional safety and reliability improvements. While keeping safety features like autorotation, we have removed the need for a swashplate. T hese reductions in moving parts and points of failure has resulted in a more reliable and serviceable vehicle. Balancing of torque between two of the main rotors reduces the load on the tail to 1/3 compared with single

- rotor helicopters. Additionally, by r emotely piloting the UAS, we have removed the pilot from d anger during flight operations.

At present, we do not fly autonomously, our international award

- winning pilot Reza Nemovi controls the vehicle within line of sight using an RC remote. The vehicle o perates below 400 ft. agl and does not fly near or over people. These vehicles are purely used for R&D to demonstrate the capability of Skylift’s intellectual property to potential customers and investors. Our hope is to continue developing this technology in coordination with FAA guidelines to create a safe and reliable commercial vehicle.

In addition to the hundreds of hours spent designing, machining and bench testing our vehicles, we have attached an Excel spreadsheet used to record our experimental f light logs. In addition to our 3D CAD drawings, please see the attached manuals and links for our components.

○ Attached

■ Align T

- rex 700 tail

■ DJI NAZA Flight Controller

■ YGE 320HV ESC

■ SAB HPS 3

■ SAB H0429

- S

○ Linked

■ Hitec Aurora 9x RC

■ Castle Creations HV160 ESC

■ Castle Creations 80 ESC

■ HiTec 8SB9360TH Servos

■ NeuMotor 1915 1.5Y

■ NeuMotor 2230 .5Y

■ NeuMotor 1910 2Y
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. David DENNIS, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections for the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-451.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus dismissed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Northrop Grumman Corporation ) ASBCA No. 61771 

) 

Under Contract No. F04701-02-C-0009 et al. ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Stephen J. McBrady, Esq. 

Charles Baek, Esq. 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

Washington, DC 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Carol Matsunaga, Esq. 

Senior Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Carson, CA 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER 

By letter dated June 19, 2018, a contracting officer issued a final decision, 

asserting a government claim against appellant. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal 

on August 27, 2018. Subsequently, the parties jointly requested the appeal be dismissed, 

asserting that the contracting officer's final decision had been rescinded. 

Where a contracting officer unequivocally rescinds a final decision asserting a 

government claim, there is no longer any claim before the Board to adjudicate, and the 

Board has dismissed the appeal as moot. URS Federal Support Servs., Inc., ASBCA 

No. 60364, 17-1BCA136,587 at 178,204; Combat Support Assocs., ASBCA 

Nos. 58945, 58946, 16-1BCA136,288 at 176,974. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed 

as moot. 

Dated: September 27, 2019 

(Signatures continued) 

ministrative Judge 

hairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I concur 

J.REIDPUTY 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

OWEN C. WILSON 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61771, Appeal of Northrop 

Grumman Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Investors FinancialServices, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Bennie H. Duck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesAct of 1934; and

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  March 14, 2005

 
|   | By: /s/ Bennie  H. Duck  |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Bennie H. Duck           |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
#### Kenneth Earl KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-382.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 18, 1972.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against upon a charge of robbery but was convicted and sentenced of conspiracy to commit robbery. The appellant urges that conspiracy to commit robbery is not an offense included under a charge of robbery and therefore his conviction was void. Finchen v. State, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 749; Robinson v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 133 So.2d 310; see also Brown v. State, Fla. 1968, 206 So.2d 371.

We concur, and accordingly the conviction and sentence here under review are reversed with directions to discharge the appellant from custody. However, this reversal is without prejudice to the State to proceed with further action not inconsistent herewith. Finchen v. State, supra; Mackey v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 223 So.2d 380.

Reversed.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, TT., concur.
251 La. 756

#### Ruth Parker TURNER v. CADDO PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, Harold J. and Francine Dumas.

No. 49021.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 2, 1968.

In re: Caddo Parish School Board applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 204 So.2d 294.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.