alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Elaine Linda RUIZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-242.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 11, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1974.

John Lazarus, Perrine, for appellant.

Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for ap-pellee.

Before CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Florida Insurance Exchange v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 178 So.2d 211.
Order entered September 23, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00682
- CV
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY A SSOCIATES, LLC, Appellant
V. BEN TALPLACIDO, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Tex as Trial Court Cause No. 004
- 421
- 2010 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s September 18, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file its brief on or before October 9, 2013. We caution appellant that no further extension of time wil l be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
II 

Calendar No. 240 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1512 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 6, 2013 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1512 RS

1 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST THEODORE MATTHEW GLENDE 

2 POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Roch5 ester, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Theodore 

11 Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 240 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1512 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postdore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. Rochester, New York, as the ‘‘Specialist Theo- al Service located at 1335 Jefferson Road in 

NOVEMBER 6, 2013 

Reported without amendment 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-10964

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANYEL BOLEY,

 Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:96-CR-129-1-Y)

---------------------------------------------

July 1, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Danyel Boley appeals his conviction and sentence for

distribution of cocaine base. He argues that the district court

abused its discretion in allowing an unduly suggestive in-court

identification and by admitting physical evidence with insufficient

evidence concerning the chain-of-custody. Boley also contends that

his sentence should not have been based on the quantity of cocaine
No. 97-10964

-2-

base concerned in Count Two of the indictment and that Boley should

have been sentenced on the amount of pure cocaine involved, not the

mixture that is cocaine base.

Boley waived his in-court-identification issue by failing

to brief the district court's denial of his motion for a lineup

based in part on Boley's failure to comply with a local rule that

motions be supported with a brief. See United States v. Wilkes, 20

F.3d 651, 652 (5th Cir. 1994); FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(4); Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Even if we

considered that issue as a plenary matter, the in-court

identification was not impermissibly suggestive. The evidence

concerning the chain of custody was sufficient for admission.

United States v. Casto, 889 F.2d 562, 568-69 (5th Cir. 1989). The

sentencing judge did not err by including the weight of the

diluents in cocaine base or by including the conduct concerned in

Count Two of the indictment. United States v. Smallwood, 920 F.2d

1231, 1237-38 (5th Cir. 1991); See United States v. Cartwright, 6

F.3d 294, 303-04 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1547 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to review the dialysis pilot 

program implemented by the Department of Veterans Affairs and submit 

a report to Congress before expanding that program, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 24), 2013 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to review the 

dialysis pilot program implemented by the Department 

of Veterans Affairs and submit a report to Congress 

before expanding that program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Dialysis Pilot 

5 Program Review Act of 2013’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1547 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXPANSION OF DIALYSIS PILOT 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 (a) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

4 shall not expand the dialysis pilot program to any facility 

5 that is not an initial facility until after the date that— 

6 (1) the Secretary has implemented the dialysis 

7 pilot program at each initial facility for a period of 

8 not less than two years; 

9 (2) an independent analysis of the dialysis pilot 

10 program has been conducted at each initial facility; 

11 and 

12 (3) the report required by subsection (b) has 

13 been submitted. 

14 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the date 

15 of the completion of the independent analysis required by 

16 subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall submit to Congress 

17 a report that— 

18 (1) includes the results of that independent 

19 analysis; and 

20 (2) addresses any recommendations with re21 spect to the dialysis pilot program provided in a re22 port prepared by the Government Accountability Of23 fice. 

24 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

25 (1) DIALYSIS PILOT PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘di26 alysis pilot program’’ means the pilot demonstration 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 1547 IS

1 program established by the Secretary in 2009 to 

2 provide dialysis care to patients at certain outpatient 

3 facilities operated by the Department of Veterans 

4 Affairs. 

5 (2) INITIAL FACILITY.—The term ‘‘initial facil6 ity’’ means one of the four outpatient facilities iden7 tified by the Secretary to participate in the dialysis 

8 pilot program prior to the date of the enactment of 

9 this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UROQUEST MEDICAL
CORPORATION, INCLUDING THE NOTES THERETO, OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,247,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,953,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,817,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,129,664
<PP&E>                                       7,794,444
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,465,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,413,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,459,304
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,453
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,283,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,413,507
<SALES>                                      9,183,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,183,170
<CGS>                                        4,555,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,555,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,884,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,156,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    60,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,216,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,216,720)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         198,342
<SECURITIES>                                    51,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  421,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                    69,098
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               992,005
<PP&E>                                         294,213
<DEPRECIATION>                                 181,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,230,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,080,516
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,751
<OTHER-SE>                                     859,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,230,752
<SALES>                                      1,686,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,686,267
<CGS>                                          694,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,692,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,798
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,702
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,702
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,702
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 59 ) ll-K - (B ) -4 7 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:50AM Sheet 59of 325P. 2 

# 2 7 II-K-(B)-4 7

CRICICA L REVIE

W O F MODE L INPUTS . Lette r fro

m T . Hogan , EE

A t o R . Short , EPArSASD . Jul y 30 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-4 7
#### Aaron Lester SARPY v. Theresa Locicero SARPY.

No. 62544.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Aaron Lester Sarpy applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson. 359 So.2d 750.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., would grant the writ.
#### Sarah Margaret ROBERTS, etc., and Duane Lawrence Tolliver, a minor, Appellants, v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, Florida, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1346.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 19, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         567,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  414,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,525
<INVENTORY>                                    377,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,528,019
<PP&E>                                      34,535,786
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,042,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,900,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,140,746
<BONDS>                                      5,670,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,282,032
<OTHER-SE>                                     856,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,900,249
<SALES>                                     27,837,878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,837,878
<CGS>                                        8,414,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,414,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,229,114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             305,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                836,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                   276,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            560,347
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   560,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 11

                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss per share is calculated as follows:
(in thousands)                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED                     NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    SEPTEMBER 30,                          SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              2000                1999               2000              1999
                                                        -----------------   -----------------    --------------   ---------------
<S>                                                     <C>                 <C>                  <C>              <C>
Net loss                                                        $ (2,029)           $ (4,434)         $ (7,255)        $ (14,157)
                                                        =================   =================    ==============   ===============

BASIC:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding                   10,357              10,018            10,214             9,988
                                                        =================   =================    ==============   ===============

     Net loss per common share                                   $ (0.20)            $ (0.44)          $ (0.71)          $ (1.42)
                                                        =================   =================    ==============   ===============

DILUTED:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding                   10,357              10,018            10,214             9,988
     Effect of dilutive securities:
         Convertible notes                                             -                   -                 -                 -
         Stock options                                                 -                   -                 -                 -
         Warrants                                                      -                   -                 -                 -
                                                        -----------------   -----------------    --------------   ---------------
     Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares outstanding                            10,357              10,018            10,214             9,988
                                                        =================   =================    ==============   ===============

     Net loss per common and common
         equivalent share                                        $ (0.20)            $ (0.44)          $ (0.71)          $ (1.42)
                                                        =================   =================    ==============   ===============

</TABLE>
#### Rosella W. EWING, Appellant, v. Joseph W. SNOW, Jr., Appellee.

No. 69-641.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Willie Lee WEBSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-163.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 7, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
11-~l--W.i.:t~~~~~:,;,;;z=q,:.:,¥-'iU~--'-+=l~~.w..::134¥I,c.f---!--!--J.-l'~~~~~~~~:+--_:__J.d~~~~l-------f-4'~::a..<'-'-'--+--,---:.-+--l--""'~<±:>~+'-----'-'-''--'--'-.f--+-

f-:_c:.~~~QJ,J.~~__:_-l--_-~~~~~~---l~~--P'-""--!-----!-=-!--"l~~~-l-"-=":_,,..,;,._-~-'-~-.-

L.l--~><-~~'4u,d,.;~~4Ji.;J__ __ ,_μ~.L<.,"""°t--l-t~-"'---H:;p;~"""""f-~-L:b..&'2"1~~4-<:::b~~-1--'--=---l----l-'.--

,Jl,Z~<ha~iL!b!J~;..;,_,~~!.Q!1L' 

4.c...c:.U!27.!4--..'...f&i~~'0Lj.2J'..j.22l,J._:.-l..c.--l--lc..'.::..:t~JffeL.k;<'4t~~l.4l--l-'-:-,~'...:!....,--'...:.jμ(~""'!-~-r-l----~#~"""'...._-l-----lfJ~--..:::z""""~=-lr-..,,..;~-~~-li-:C!

.,,,)~:;:3~ff0:'.~m-~~t~±~"fl;~Stf=t~~~j~~ff!!~~~=:'.l=tt=t;ti±~~~~ttl~~~4~~=L:~~g:,;::£:=~~:Z~i~~~~~4:~~~r:::t~=S:~=J=~\-j_·"'

C,.'. ~!.c.::it:::..::....:.--c::.!-:f/4~~_;_ ___:__ _ _.l.!~'t/1,4;~~~-#.s..U-~<IA!lid~~«U~~~~~w-

~1JI~11:i*-ll~~~ijt~~~~~f¥i~d~~~~~~~~~~stg6~~~~~~!~rr~t~f~ttr~~r;"~~~~t;-;-;-;-;-;-~tt~~~r~~~rt;--;~~~t~~r~t!~;-f~~~~rr~rrtr~~~r~~·-li_8~~-~--'1
EX-10.23





 Exhibit 10.23 

SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 

Independent non-employee directors of Mastech Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) will receive an
annual retainer fee of $65,000 in 2021, other than the Chair of the Audit Committee who will receive an annual retainer fee of $69,000 in 2021. In addition, independent non-employee directors of the
Company are eligible to participate in the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). On January 30, 2021, our independent non-employee directors each
received a restricted share grant under the Stock Incentive Plan of 3,985 restricted shares, which shares vest over a one-year period. 

Non-independent directors of the Company will not receive any compensation for their service as
directors of the Company. 
 All of the Company’s directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with
attending Board of Directors and committee meetings.
; j
ene eee ae
t i
=| 5
FA
g
2 4
“A 3
Fy >
2 ‘
2 | ;
& ¢
q a sd
ga o£
Ss
27 2
2 6
2 4
S
2 2
= 5
7
2 6
& yg
a ij
£8
- 2
3 83
Ss &
23
a
g 3
2 3
za
5 2
A Pa
2 3
gs a
za 3
= 26
a 8
£8
gS « +
2 § j
s 2
2 % (Ym al
Fy 7
gc
= 5 1
z
ze i
B 68
§ &£ ,
2 3 4
z 3
i 3
3 yg A
< 2
3s 3
2 §
= 3
2-7; = ‘6
a 4
= 3] i
5
2a g
s 3} &
i 2
3 5
s —
5
8
2 f
3 =
2 fs
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36588-36589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16152]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Radio Broadcasting Services; AM or FM Proposals To Change the 
Community of License

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: The agency must receive comments on or before September 28, 
2018.

[[Page 36589]]


ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, 202-418-2054.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following applicants filed AM or FM 
proposals to change the community of license: MARION R. WILLIAMS, 
WAKE(AM), Fac. ID No. 53057, Channel 1500 kHz, From VALPARAISO, IN, To 
HOBART, IN, BP-20180504ABA; MARSHFIELD BROADCASTING CO., INC., 
WMEX(AM), Fac. ID No. 12789, Channel 1510 kHz, From BOSTON, MA, To 
QUINCY, MA, BP-20180615AAH; REVIVAL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES, INC., 
WSGG(FM), Fac. ID No. 92857, Channel 207A, From NORFOLK, CT, To CANAAN, 
CT, BPED-20180430AAI; RIVER RAT RADIO, LLC, NEW(FM), Fac. ID No. 
198736, Channel 269C2, From BAGDAD, AZ, To CIENEGA SPRINGS, AZ, BMPH-
20180530AAZ; PHARIS BROADCASTING, INC., KHGG-FM, Fac. ID No. 12231, 
Channel 278A, From WALDRON, AR, To MANSFIELD, AR, BPH-20180619AAZ; 
PHARIS BROADCASTING, INC., KQBK(FM), Fac. ID No. 71701, Channel 284C2, 
From BOONEVILLE, AR, To WALDRON, AR, BPH-20180619ABA; and BRYAN A. 
KING, KOTY(FM), Fac. ID No. 83100, Channel 240C3, From MERTZON, TX, To 
CHRISTOVAL, TX, BPH-20180709AAU.
    The full text of these applications is available for inspection and 
copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference 
Center, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554 or electronically via 
the Media Bureau's Consolidated Data Base System, http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/cdbs_pa.htm.

Federal Communications Commission.
Nazifa Sawez,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2018-16152 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### Thomas CODE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1454.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 17, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Peter M. deManio, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.