alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4 _*
ram, zs .

TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES. ° B

D> —— .
wn ee) SCHEDULE No. 1.~POPULATION. Swim) ag

Enumeration District Xo,

Le Rassy Tim. Name of Institution,

Township or other division of county, wp Besces

Name of incorporated city, town, or vitage, within the above-named division, Wand of city, .X.

Enumerated by me on the. Sf. day of Jue, 1900, | Barry Bnumerator

RELATION. ‘PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. ‘SAR. ‘errizessmre | oocuPATION.raaDE. oF

re) tee, Mocs tire Mel
a fomay
Lilt Wik are i loz

a a is BPEL aed

:

be unt issu Al 2246 5°
ee gee
2] Bere. |e lh eg. tena 4 8

Mwaper, pe21S) |__|
by wake ante 6 |_|

teal
6 Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau. _1_.
& i ulos
38 Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here. wal
»
sa tec, \puiphten..fo.'A. hull x93 16 8. f pe]
— ° lo & Ope pit g ea
Abts 2 es | ‘
spl. Po. 24%, |Meat pe4|
ft ae ec sb
Wacol, R ea
in MO PHeea Ws. Wes deoy dec otd
Y Heed} We ey ebb a pe
S 2
“oad

ANE

.
e

(

ESE

° leerey. Lor Ul oS yore 99 he
, mez 6) |
Apes Pala ies acl
a Lint” | te f
Dacron, qearbenl | lM rl et |
— oe PT unpe = eh See push
» my Ire... loeadatir. WHE
af er ee ogucek
* i |——_ L m agen saors Lt
" i Ameticr 9 bab hire WR det ga) 978.1.
* Johenst we look geseglili 2
San Loal_105 It lek pata '8ofth'a | |
He don. |ul qu  & |]
tee te les aed ol ads
po oll 39 Uh! 0
ars le7lag m0} oo. - peyote!
taly i y ppeojgee| ||
oF pone Zs mm "0
. s65.ple 7 °
hon iSejeeped | =) |
aie iF PAY 4
ne a
Lea}
pope 6
7 oadiee es
2 Goeelzs yea |
oS;
lee.

a
#### In the Matter of Juan Rodriguez, Petitioner, v New York City Department of Correction et al., Respondents.

[735 NYS2d 763]

Determination of respondent Commissioner, dated August 28, 2000, finding petitioner inmate guilty of narcotics possession and imposing a penalty of 90 days in punitive segregation, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County [Peter Benitez, JJ, entered on or about March 16, 2001) dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner’s argument that substantial evidence is lacking to support the hearing officer’s finding that petitioner possessed heroin because the NIK drug test results relied upon by the hearing officer were received without a proper foundation is unavailing. Petitioner makes no claim that he timely objected to the admission of the NIK test results at the disciplinary hearing. We note, in any case, that NIK test results have been recognized by courts as facially competent evidence *(see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*71 NY2d 135, 144; *Matter of Angel A.,*92 NY2d 430, 435). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         447,761
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         854,563
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 75,277,376
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      12,819,426
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        12,842,700
<LOANS>                                    117,558,425
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (454,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             216,134,524
<DEPOSITS>                                 115,589,580
<SHORT-TERM>                                12,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,822,009
<LONG-TERM>                                 43,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,814
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,785,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             216,134,524
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,443,242
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,224,748
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,667,990
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,810,873
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,538,427
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,129,563
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              90,767
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,842,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                589,846
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     565,312
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   565,312
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.95
<LOANS-NON>                                    231,931
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               449,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              454,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           454,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### George CURTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 20, 1972.

Carr & Emory, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William L. Rogers, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Washington, Fla. (No. 41,256 May 10, 1972).
EXHIBIT
31.1  CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302   I, Edward B. Meyercord, III,
certify that:  1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of Talk America Holdings, Inc.;  2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;  4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:  a)         designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b)   
 [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5,
2003)]  c)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)         all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and  b)         any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  April
25, 2005  /s/  Edward B. Meyercord, III Edward
B. Meyercord, III Chief
Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Steven M. Caspers, certify that:



1.

        I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;




2.

        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.

        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.

        The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)

        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)

        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.




c)

        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.

        The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)

        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)

        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.






Date:

        January 12, 2009

        

        /s/ Steven M. CaspersExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




---
No. 00-1193.

#### Porro et ux. *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
0a inet to adn. Sogo antes 112, 15,10, 1,1, 98829 aze to bo arn iat al
merely Gran an afirmative mark, as /. r >

in the County of Alaa State

pe 5: ae Run ember 726 an 7 ae

Sofeporn-1 “inhabitants is in [=z i
of Bzedoezese!, entimeratéd by me on'the._ut7“day of La

yl

roa
& | smeariacea

esr

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Censi

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

47 aa

a

LZZzZ

ACA AIOE

pio stamatees sh sini AA nin on ry

piers
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobile Services Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Allan
Villegas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|

|Date: December 17, 2007 |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       
|                       
|                       
|                        |  | /s/ Allan Villegas     
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          65,807
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  312,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,360
<INVENTORY>                                  1,416,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,827,044
<PP&E>                                      44,574,951
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,854,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,502,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,765,688
<BONDS>                                      9,655,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,575,522
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,213,921
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,502,121
<SALES>                                     35,084,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,084,663
<CGS>                                       11,874,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,874,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,315,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             533,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,261,156
<INCOME-TAX>                                   378,347
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            882,809
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   882,809
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 0 2 7 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. A U R E L I O M A R T I N E Z , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 1 : 0 9

- C R

- 7 5 0

- 2

B e f o r e D A V I S , S M I T H , a n d W I E N E R , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t A u r e l i o M a r t i n e z h a s

m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. M a r t i n e z h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 17, 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40027 Document: 00511206117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
7-224.

TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES. ; 164 - A

State ERO een ine = | | SCHEDULE No. {.—_POPUL ATION. ( Supervisor's District No. se \ ms No.

len umeration District No. 222:

County ideas Sia aac

Township or other division of county ------- aaa CAN ARG an at Ary). adn Sa Selina tieiniaeneiaaas “NON: OF Insheilion, Pe i ee en f 5 Kos oath vs wes eee
[Insert name ¢ of to wnship, town, precinct, district, or other civil division, as the case may ‘be. See instructions. ]
C Ward of citi, 22h

Name of tneorporated city, town, or village, within the above-named division. LAR .._fa/ra_,- Be ee en St eee ee

. f rf / { ; _ f
Enumerated by me on the —---—---+—...----. day of June, 1900, Naat Malone bitin Mt A Ap _..., Enumerator. 6 / / 0

OCCUPATION, TRADE, OR EDUCATION. OWNERSHIP OF HOME.
PROFESSION = _ =a a

of each person TEN YEARS of age
and over.

LOCATION, NAME RELATION. PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. NATIVITY. CITIZENSHIP.

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If born in the United
States, give the Stale or Territory: if of foreign birth, give the Cowatry only.

of each person whose place of
abode on June 1, 1900, was RTH.
in this family.

IN CITIES.

wr mortgaged

of dwelling-

house, in the order of

Visitation.

mraliverecd,

et

Relationship of each
person to the head
of the family.

Enter surname first, then the given name and
middle initial, if any.

United States,

Place of birth of this Place of birth of Fatrurr Place of birth of Mornen
Person. of this person. of this person.

|

Month. Year. Ocevratios,

|

United States,
employed,
months).

living.

INciupe every person living on Jane 1, 1900
Oset children born «nce June 1, 1900,

Mother of low many |
the

Nomber of years married

Nutober of thovechildren
Year of immigration te
Number of yeara in the
Attended school (in
Can apeak Englleh.
Number of farm schedule.

Number of family, in the
order of visitation,
Whether single, married,
1
Ohwnedor rented

Faim or hone,

Age at last birthday,
Naturalization,
Mouths not
Can read,

Can write,
Owned Cree «

children,

whlowed, «

House Number,

Color or race.

Number

>

(3 yy se 2t Tic@e Sis
BT | Vinanltiys 3 |
TK ey de
BV vane 27 2D a VE WADIA
3 ae ve lEe n = Semcon MA . ae Wins

. “ete

a S| cc 2 ee a i pV. ~L U. wh" AAA oh, Winn Mr
he ( mn ed = a ees ona B Pann UCR A Ain ch. CAateawme

/ oN r _—
A (w mw ‘ es a fe
,

‘

i, * Sle yn é é LLVA

nD. CG, 1F2% a ‘ne dadiewna ¥ hare Vrain
Oly seas La W AL aa. ) ean A bacdeny
| aaa! 4/ ) a a. Yr». / Li ‘ 3 Se ao
Rene EWES T y°2 Oda .
b i a paar wel Aas bit YY) 2-21 VAAAIMARA ue MK aay
A OF Yyaalingiea a | VWyis2 3 nana! YW. Aconartona
phy Behl aye L ardinann Fe alan eden
fot: reer: ra SWIM Do] Leen, — Finneaee
Dy non | Bel ei |_| yn 2 aan! YYincavna
ne Vien
Yrwaae ADA

Paz VV Anan hana:
“Taw Yaad nana Praca, Nic alan

Ynnrzecuna”

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http:/Awww.archives.gov for more information about publicly ><—-
available records like the one shown here. |

jt iis = 2 is.

Ph ieqs, ite td
252 La. 701

#### Lonzo S. MILAM v. MUNICIPAL FIRE AND POLICE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF DeRIDDER, Louisiana.

No. 49149.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 21, 1968.

ORDER

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable James C. Terrell, Jr. Judge of the Thirtieth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Beauregard to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 12th day of November, 1968, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through its attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be. granted.

Writs granted; but limited to the correctness vel non of the district court’s judgment dismissing the appeal.
No. 10711.

#### Konst *v.*The Christ Diehl Brewing Co.

Decided February 16, 1909.

Error to Circuit- Court of Putnam county.

*Messrs. Bailey & Leasure,*for- plaintiff in error.

*Mr. B. F.*
      *470
      *Enos*and *Messrs. Risser & Smith,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Foye Lee TURNER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-629.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.