alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MINUTES OF THE GOVERNING BOARD

OF THE ANTELOPE VALLEY AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA

AGENDA ITEM 

DATE: May 20, 2014

RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing to consider the amendment of Rule 

701- Air Pollution Emergency Contingency Actions: a. Open public hearing; b. Receive 

staff report; c. Receive public testimony; d. Close public hearing; e. Make a 

determination that the CEQA Categorical Exemption applies; f. Waive reading of 

Resolution; g. Adopt Resolution making appropriate findings, certifying the Notice of 

Exemption amending Rule 701- Air Pollution Emergency Contingency Actions and 

directing staff actions.

SUMMARY: The proposed amendment to Rule 701 will provide administrative cleanup 

of this rule by replacing out-of-date references and updating rule format.

BACKGROUND: The Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District (AVAPCD) was 

created by statute on July 1, 1997, with a jurisdiction of the Los Angeles County portion 

of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) that was not within the 

South Coast Air Basin. SCAQMD rules in effect in the AVAPCD remained in effect 

until the AVAPCD Governing Board superseded or amended them. On January 1, 2002 

the AVAQMD was formed pursuant to statute to replace the AVAPCD (Health & Safety 

Code §§41300 et seq.). The rules of the AVAPCD also remain in effect until the 

AVAQMD Governing Board supersedes or amends them

The proposed amendments to Rule 701 Air Pollution Emergency Contingency Actions

will provide administrative cleanup of this rule by replacing out-of-date references, 

updating rule format and adjusting Episode Criteria for PM.

This action was previously noticed by publication December 20, 2013, but no action was 

taken. This item was again noticed March 14, 2014 for the April 15, 2014 meeting. The 

Governing Board did not take action on this item at the April 15, 2014 meeting and 

deferred it to the next regularly scheduled meeting of May 20, 2014.

A Notice of Exemption, Categorical Exemption (Class 8; 14 Cal. Code Reg. §15308) will 

be prepared by the AVAQMD for the Amendment of Rule 701 pursuant to the 

requirements of CEQA.

Cc:Barbara Lods
MINUTES OF THE GOVERNING BOARD

OF THE ANTELOPE VALLEY AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA

AGENDA ITEM PAGE 2

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: Health & Safety Code §§40702 and 40703 require 

the Governing Board to hold a public hearing before adopting rules and regulations. Also, 42 

U.S.C. §7410(l) (FCAA §110(l)) requires that all SIP revisions be adopted after public notice 

and hearing.

REVIEW BY OTHERS: This item was reviewed as to legal form by Karen Nowak, District 

Counsel and by Eldon Heaston, Executive Director on or before May 5, 2014.

FINANCIAL DATA: No increase in appropriation is anticipated.

PRESENTER: Bret Banks, Operations Manager
#### Richard Floyd DEVOE v. STATE.

No. 35989.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Rehearing Denied April 7, 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 192 So.2d 96.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.33-57648, 33-81064, 333-15679, 333-33885, 333-47536, 333-47538 and 333-88387 on Form S-8 of our reports dated May 14, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Material Sciences Corporation(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption on March 1, 2007, of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48,*Accounting for Uncertaintyin Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*) and the effectiveness of Material Sciences Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Material SciencesCorporation for the year ended February 28, 2009. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Chicago, IL 

May 14, 2009 

 

1
EXHIBIT 1

Rules Adopted by the State

A. Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART)

a. BART Rule

b. Public and EPA Comments

c. DEP Response to Comments

   

Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 1 of 12
A.Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART)

Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 2 of 12
Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 3 of 12
Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 4 of 12
Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 5 of 12
Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 6 of 12
Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 7 of 12
Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 8 of 12
Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 9 of 12
Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 10 of 12
Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 11 of 12
Response to EPA comments on the Florida BART rule 62-296.340, F.A.C. – December 12, 2006 Letter 

from Kay Prince, Chief, Air Planning Branch to Joseph Kahn, Director, Division of Air Resource 

Management. 

Two comments were made in the EPA letter. The first comment notes that the compliance date for 

BART, as described in the Florida rule, is acceptable, but that formally the federal requirement is that 

compliance should be no later than five years after approval of the implementation plan revision. 

Response by DEP: Had the SIP revision been approved prior to the end of December 2008, then the 

compliance date in the Florida BART rule would not have met the federal requirement. However, the 

timing of the SIP submittal by the state, and approval of the revision by EPA, make this potentiality not 

possible. 

The second comment by EPA reminds the DEP that proper documentation of the modeling exemption 

threshold for BART of 0.5 deciviews must be included in the SIP submittal. 

Response by DEP: This documentation has been included the SIP submittal. 

Regional Haze SIP for Florida 

Exhibit 1

Page 12 of 12
Exhibit 32.2

      Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ R. Alan Miller
                                    -----------------------
                                    R. Alan Miller
                                    Chief Financial Officer


Date:  March 24, 2005
# STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JOE WASHINGTON NO. 2021 KW 1044 

### JANUARY 27, 2022 In Re: Joe Washington, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 03- 11- 0290. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ.



### WRIT DENIED. VGW AHP WIL

C 

### OF APEAL F ST CIRCUIT

Q OF COURT



### FOR THE COURT
/
rs

¢
Ftc
"es

Ae
74a, ad
4 Meck s =

OF
_ VEsyorzer
Pa

* YW Caey
_
hy got Vd

w/LL

fcc a7

A. acy a 7
‘"@
WA

hana le sof

pz

f
<

od. tly <a
(Sader Ccag

S:
Al
v4
SAE’

L

4

stg

gh arnele“et
A tLe jh Ape aad

fae
Lo te y Ds 5 y Ow

te C2l Os

4

al (
Karner,

tee re es
om carr XK
a
C#t Ch Le
Cl tc4 ter
r=.
Ay
LELEL

\

“LL

‘
lOUCAE tH OC
~)
LAs, 8
tn oludeng Z

|

}

chad .Beus ford

Voberr theark:

Foe Bole;

yVeee Lie tle»?
Mat Sh Sta?
(PtH hos Azz CL
Gelert Gree pefe’

2 (ateze’ haat LUGE?
vy
Pale. (a ised La as

oe Y § "a Gare g pe
|

he

| ~  s
ie

ot ? ee

| Gaon ~ 09) careliacs
 Iyaae Big ees Ja’?

| Lar lhay AlaOE’

‘2 2% Lee i 7am
: W, Whit fot / WLag Eb: VSI
| Witenes Alle
7 Colter Wh, yh ttn

Ww
TANG Ke ~

Senn S bers 9: 220d jor
ohn ir Bb es §. ay My | Yo higres SE ragaais

sede riche GO LL 2" nian PLL : Historic census records are maintained and released by
| Daruie Lagae j the National Archives and Records Administration,

not the U.S. Census Bureau.
Benjamin LOc24,

| Ais laird Cer? _ Visit htt Iwww.archives. OV for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown nee

| 9 ‘isa belle Ae (Min Se er ae J ee 0 Need CH Scr
MY |
err Ca et ey B “G C4 chadt Poor
| Aes ow Lx LLage\ } 7 } CO Q Chistian 0 brat
, | o--4i2 2ACt | EE. Carte
Pettha.. bP ny , , 4b. v.
iP. . DY C2 thé 7 LLC tie
: “& ees slp . 2 ibe. Be by CC] c pattijn-
wie Lkcecs DIPS © Oy

ee

QQ AS AOA

ee Y SIO SP Fo-nind
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-06-312-CV

FANTASY RANCH, INC.	APPELLANT	

	V.

CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS	APPELLEES

AND LICENSE AND AMORTIZATION 

APPEAL BOARD OF THE CITY OF 

ARLINGTON, TEXAS	

	----------

	FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On December 4, 2006, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed the court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2).  TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.  

	Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.   Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

	In addition, appellee’s Motion to Dissolve Post-Judgment Injunction is GRANTED.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(a)(4).  The trial court’s orders suspending enforcement of the judgment are hereby vacated.

	Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM 		 	

PANEL D:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.                                       

DELIVERED: January 11, 2007.
261 La. 827

#### STATE of Louisiana v. UNITED VEGETABLE GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Inc.

No. 52411.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 1972.

In re: United Vegetable Growers Association, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 260 So.2d 26.

Writ denied. Since no timely appeal was taken from the judgment of July 22, 1970, it became final.
se a ‘ = — rod, : A Sas Supervisors Disteiet Nov Ly Shes: to
eee |, SCHEDULE No. | POPULATION. | er

[I cof to : hip, town, precinct, district, or other ci fl te 3 0 cas mi 6 ins ior. 3 Na se of Institution, ae ae = Te eS ed et
_ Name of incorporated city, town, or village, within the above-named division, zs CL) Se : —____ Ward of city, — +

> J—224.

2 TWELFTH CENSUS OF “PD!

E UNITED STATES. B

SS a

aca District No. 2

Township_or other division of county

Lee ee ee
Le ote le Enumerator.

Enumerated by me on the - AL ae -9
as AS Lf

LOCATION. NAME PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. NATIVITY. CITIZENSHIP. OCCUPATION, ts OR EDUCATION, OWNERSHIP OF HOME.
. PROFESSI

: f Place of birth of each person and parents of cuch pérson enumerated. If born in the United T = ——s —
re Gites is 3 of rs ecg a aaa ema o- DATE OF 2 z States, give the Stale or Territory, if of foreign birth, give the Couatry only. s 2 of each person TEN YEARS of age Ss 3 =
ES Se | <3 in this family. arate a |e 8, |s and over. 3 ; & ;
Tr . [se | Be : ine awe f= | 8 == — — a = ; | 3s .
g | = a= Enter surname first, then the given name and Relationship of each = 2 Ss e3 = ~ = rr) z = g =
Satl se middle initial, ifany. person to tho head = Es |73| Wy fe FS s/5]3 2
E 23/5¢ : of the family. ‘= . sels Place of birth of this Place of birth of Farurn Place of birth of Mornzn £2 |sz] 3% a : F; se ~ | eB)a Ss

-= onth, ‘ear. : BSON, 9 rson. ‘0 person. a z| = |; S24s s =
re . s 2s zg 5 Inctupe every person living on June 1, 1900. 3 | 22 * S> | s3 z Occuratiox paf-4 Ee 5 : g = = S$ g
e = 5 22 EE Omir cliildren born since June 1, 1900, == s= ES =£ 5 2 3 = a = > £ = 5
rey we =— —
a | — ae Zz > z a a |< & 3 i oe | a
14 15 16 | 17 20] 21 2 23 = 25 | 26 | 27 28
Oy

ee Mur s7jzess| | | Zealand! |
Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,

not the U.S. Census Bureau.

? =f LAA
y Higa beer Ball Reston na Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
S M)
Re ears available records like the one shown here.
7 Gel c BAUS y: Mx __|P0 HOLL ESAYD IN VIN Daath YC \ Andee [pes
; mn psy

i——— i¥ - 4 -- let ladtad d bette hated oF -<-- = St oa «<- § --£--)...4-f #4. — -- ee ee es

-—-eeee - a wee wee es -—= woh wane es

.
Te wwe en ee eee -_ = — ee ee bee

al ees ee, ne a See, OF ee 8 Ses 2 a 4 ©. FE ES (PS 6 2 2 SS ee

. “a 7 bd
eee ne | --——- an - te - — ——- --- - en ee SS oe oe ew ee ee =

4 N/A Me 44 Vi

a bik

MOTT
+- VU Mn #e

whe YY

p Loandla| hgaag foamed

;
Pe) LA
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0289 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMES MICHAEL WEBB, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee ’ s motion for a 30 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 1 8 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 18 2020

08/18/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0289
#### GRIFFITH SERVICES, INC., a corporation, Appellant, v. WALTER KIDDE CONSTUCTORS, INC., a corporation, Appellee.

No. P-408.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 23, 1972.

S. Gordon Blalock, of Blalock, Holbrook, Lewis, Paul & Bennett, Jacksonville, for appellant.

James M. McLean, and David M. Foster, of Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an adverse final judgment rendered in a nonjury case in favor of appellee. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

In our review of the issues presented for decision we have given due consideration to the applicable principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. The record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting, there is substantial evidence to support the findings made and conclusions reached by the trial court. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous.1 The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and WIGGIN-TON, and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

1

. Old Equity Life Insurance Company v. Levenson (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 50; Stoller v. Jaffe (Fla.App.1961) 125 So.2d 310.
SEAPORT Seeger ena te Rea Sate tee TE Te
. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 8,D.No, 46. E.D.No. 7-42.
: 4 LO oon SIXTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1940 = a s
County ra —— - . é «= (tianin o inetstaiien aod lines su Wich eeiview ara chap POPULATION SCHEDULE 4 926 : ‘i, ok 0. bhhtn! Saas
PLACE OF BIRTH ‘i am

RESIDENCE, APRIL 1, 1086 PERSONS 14 YEAES'OLD AND OVER—EMPLOTMENT STATUS

Location | HOUSEHOLD DATA

i

4
=

AES sta eak i en ewe vin cag oo verlag geome nme
‘of reaidence of Apa 1, 1980, was ee if . arr. = See enving Sabet coo bison

ca oe te ge eee

2 SURE 70 IROLUDE: a | sulk adrvany,

ecnergency ith fo” te
st Sites es 90. enor petoret cacopetion, edtsayrend cae earns

t (a) EE he bas. weet experieeee. ome
Bisa

?
H
I

F
‘i
i

|

if

1, Pesmeme hecon trem hemmed
eres “ae aber mamearedones porns

2, Chitdren usher 1 ‘Writs “Tatas”
Be tm tay lg

Letenbeld tn order uf

prrentery

a,
‘Pistiageieh Geomde a ing her meee
cca Raed
ns ae

is big

i " Pesemnaglatnna nt

= fag li Jaden hea
Masse fin Daigs |dom Buse |

oe
‘Number of beers!)
BS) sardine
be

cet of money

‘elary seenived
anurves Wier Chan toon

Serene |
Rusiew of Peete Behedie

facntibeekons) wei
bot Hi

(igedrwens Mac-tone woukn)
cone

| Bema red we rains .
she

Tn iy her
mal
yak
rt
#2
EF
& Sumiet ¢ weeks worked in Tree

ait

t= | Boese nasser ile ction and woune)
«| Buber of
Dew ils Soyseheld Mee an a emt
be inwke
Sh &

e
=

hy
nd

3
Foe

‘ial

&
ST | — |u| cone

-

&
dis) gee] ®
E

PAL Le AD fee] sects to, primate

aay

i

)

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

mr

sF

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

ig Ef

eREE

| Debi , thwlond &
iinet sray (elke
: Mat

fee

RF

Ft

FORGE RE RE

Seer ek
i

Fer

Hox.

sou)

aL
Sah
juss}
}

nd

4

=

EREPE RE

FY F

fe

—

ar RET RP PRED REPL E

EFEEPLPEREEREEERI SPEER

ER EER

EE

a ee ees

EE
5

jolla...

j3ui- ail fo

3:

fe

eae te no a AY | : baw |

Miol-¥ Way |_| 5D = ler Me eee Dirge Catafrraia \vo |"
SUPPLEMENTARY FOR PEUBONB OF ALI AGED
QUESTIONS FOR PERSONS 14 YEARS OLD AND OVER
¢ Persona Enumerated cn Lines 14 and 29 FEACE OF BIRTH OF FATHER AND MOTEER ae ee Aas bhipreomeasicubqor per rofanryiomenpejeeenod
perme | LJ
SS Here ne Ste See Fay ae ~ursneter mane be be Serenata

qe pevrkren work axpecieamy water “Hwan in Gol (Send lanve Cala 48 cad &7

Pied
ha. ho.

SEF

WEAF FEFEEE EE

eisa]' PY |) |e |

| Seo vinrsoet The

=
pn
®

Wi seswutsee [Palle | oy i aka 2
ool Ravens, Maal C. | \ Aa] é i |

Cal & PALUR OF ROOK, IY OWNED:

STMBOLA
auD
EXPLANATORY
BOTES
#### Anne SMALLEY, joined by her husband, John Smalley, Appellants, v. William KEETER and Inez Keeter, d/b/a Gayety Skating Rink, and Chicago Roller Skate Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 72-519.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Stewart, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
r--

 

CODE

OF FEDERAL

REGULATIONS

 

TITLE 15

Revised as of January 1, 1968

CONTAINING A CODIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY AND

FUTURE EFFECT AS OF JANUARY 1, 1968

With Ancillaries

Published by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration, as a Special Edition of the Federal Register Pursuant to Section 1 1 of the Federal Register Act as Amended
CHAPTER I -BUREAU OF THE CENSUS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Part

20 Seal.

30 Foreign trade statistics.

40 Training of foreign participants in census procedures and general statistics.

50 Special services and studies by the Bureau of the Census.

60 Public information.

70 Cutoff date for recognizing boundary changes for the 1970 censuses.

PART 20—SEAL Sec. 20.1 Authority. 20.2 Description. 20.3 Custody.

Authority: The provisions of this Part 20 issued under R.S. 161, as amended, sec. 3, 68 Stat. 1012, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 22, 13 U.S.C. 3.

Source: The provisions of this Part 20 appear at 25 P.R. 2163, Mar. 16, 1960, unless otherwise noted.

§ 20.1 Authority.

Pursuant to section 3 of Title 13, United States Code, the Bureau of the Census official seal and design thereof, which accompanies and is made a part of this document, is hereby approved.

§ 20.2 Description.

Seal : On a shield an open book beneath which is a lamp of knowledge emitting rays above in base two crossed quills. Around the whole a wreath of single leaves, surrounded by an outer band bearing between two stars the words "U.S. Department of Commerce" in the upper portion and "Bureau of the Census" in the lower portion, the let tering concentric with an inner beaded rim and an outer dentilated rim.

§ 20.3 Custody.

The seal shall remain in the custody of the Director, Bureau of the Census or

such officer or employee of the Bureau as he designates and shall be affixed to all certificates and attestations that may be required from the Bureau. 

PART 30—FOREIGN TRADE

Subpart A—General Requirements—Exporters Sec. 30.1 General statement of requirement for Shipper's Export Declarations. 30.2 Related export control requirements. 30.3 Shipper's Export Declaration forms. 30.4 Preparation and signature of Ship per's Export Declarations.

83
#### MIDGETT, Alias BALLANCE v. WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 11,

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided June 15, 1962.*

*618Before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney, Marbury and SybERT, JJ.

PER Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal is denied for the specific reasons held by the trial judge in her opinion in this proceeding to be applicable to each of the applicant’s grounds for relief, respectively.

*Application denied.*
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of International Wire Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Dated: August 14, 2006
    
    /s/ RODNEY D. KENTName: Rodney D. KentTitle: Chief Executive Officer