alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF JUNE 30,  2000 AND THE  UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF INCOME  FOR THE SIX MONTHS  ENDED  JUNE 30,  2000 OF
TALK.COM INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         000948545
<NAME>                        TALK.COM INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         89,084,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  69,089,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   11,113,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               152,739,000
<PP&E>                                         87,132,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,190,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,882,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          57,101,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       670,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,944,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,882,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,817,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,202,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               98,871,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,957,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,739,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   250,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,489,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,489,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.19



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Evergreen Solar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard G.
Chleboski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard G. Chleboski
-----------------------------
Richard G. Chleboski
Chief Financial Officer
May 2, 2005
- or2
- or1
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Roosevelt BENJAMIN, Appellee.

No. 71-568.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 18, 1972.

Marvin U. Mounts, Jr., County Sol., and James T. Carlisle, Asst. County Sol., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Norman J. Kapner, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record in this case. On the basis of the foregoing we conclude that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error. Accordingly, the order is affirmed. Brochu v. State, First District Court of Appeal, 258 So.2d 286 opinion filed February 29, 1972; but see Naylor v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 250 So.2d 660.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
No. 00-6432.

#### Wilson *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000759641
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-A LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,572,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,584,970
<PP&E>                                       3,194,254
<DEPRECIATION>                               (731,538)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,047,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,916,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,047,686
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               549,406
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,142,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,142,451
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,142,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   159.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   159.75
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      I, Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Novell, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

      (1)   The Company's periodic report on Form 10-K for the period ended
            October 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                      * * *

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

/s/ Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr.
-------------------------------------------
Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr.

Date: January 13, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DIEDRICH COFFEE, INC. UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THIRTY-NINE
WEEKS ENDED AND AS OF OCTOBER 28, 1998 CONTAINED IN COMPANY'S 3RD
QUARTER 1999 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-1998
<CASH>                                         863,730
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  289,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,334,488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,797,494
<PP&E>                                      14,405,709
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,017,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,792,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,758,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,478
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,967,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,792,097
<SALES>                                     17,996,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,996,128
<CGS>                                        8,113,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,113,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,730,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             291,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,112,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,690
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,115,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,115,722)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
254 La. 128

#### STATE ex rel. Albert Louis Todd DEAN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 49899.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 5, 1969.

In re: Albert Louis Todd Dean applying for writ of mandamus.

Application denied. Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. See 15:574.9, subd. E.
Exhibit 32.1



906 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The accompanying Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:

        January 12, 2009

        

        /s/ David H. RochePresident andChief Executive Officer




/s/ Steven M. CaspersExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer










---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August

29 , 2024

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00970

- CV

DREUX LAWES , Appellant

V.
WRH PARK ROW LLC , Appellee
On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No
. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1215102

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 26, 2023 . On August 20, 2024, the parties filed a n agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. We dismiss the appeal

. PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
#### I. Q. SCOGIN, Jr., a/k/a Buck Scogin, Appellant, v. HARMONY HOMES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-997.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative Officer of Enstar Income
Program II-2, L.P. (the Partnership) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that, the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership. /s/  Steven A. SchummSteven A. SchummChief Administrative OfficerApril 14, 2004
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **7053**

VISTON SHYROCK MARTIN , Plaintiff

– Appell ant ,
v. SERGEANT HATFIELD; T. LOWE, IHO; SERGEANT OWENS; RANDY C. MATHENA, Warden , Defendant s – Appell ees .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the We stern District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Jackson L. Kiser , Senior District Judge. ( 7:10

- cv - 00262

- jlk

- mfu )

Submitted : October 19 , 2010 Decided: October 28, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circui t Judge s .
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Viston Shyrock Martin , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Viston Shyrock Martin appeals the district court ’ s order d ismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint without prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Martin v. Hatfield , No. 7: 10

- cv - 00262

- jlk

- mfu (W.D. Va. July 23, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
nex” Inquiries numbered 7, 16, and 17 are not to be asked in respect to infants. Inquiries numbered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are to be on : é
) merely by an affirmative mark, as /. Ws

f
__, In the County of Mtr palhe . State

of LAL , enumerated by me on the LP des ot Le , 1870. 132
Post Ofjice: = Ge bLna) Ml flee Z 7 ef , Asst Marshal.

CONSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONS,

tate

VALUE pe Bane EsTATB PARENTAGE.

=)

:

5

Z
ate

|

ba |

wards,
rote |

S. of

Whither deaf
and dumb,
blind, insane,

, &¢)
Ss.
nn re-

i

denied or obridred on

other groures th

Place of Birth, naming State
or Territory of U. S.; or the
Country, if of foreign birth.

y. If
ge and up-

isitation.

Profession, Occupation,
or Trade of each person,
male or female.

The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

numbered in|
(W.), Black] °

ive months
Us, +5.

th

Sox.—Males (M.),

or idiotic.

of visitation,

year
ious

bellion or other crime,

Females (1",)
month (Jan., Peb., &e.)
month (Jan,, eb.
L years of o
years ofage andy
where right to

wrirdda.

Attended school within the yeur,
»

(1.), Mulatto (M.), Ghi-

Value of Personal Estate.
Mother of foreign birth,

| If born within tho yenr, et
If married within the year, 5

nese (C.), Indian (1.)
Father of foreign birth,

Male Citizens of U.
Male Citizens of U.

Valuo of Real Matate.

the order of ¥
Cannot read.
Cannot write,

in fracti

under]

Families, numbered in tho onler

Age aot Inst birth-da

Dwelling-honses,
Color.—W hite

—

10

7

other

nds 6 = a) 1 mel
yellion or other crimas...

va)
©
i
w
ae
Ow
—_
i
=
<P)
wes
a}
=
©
ih)
S

—_

wwe

‘

———

Mb A. Pow
V An Pitas
“Ft

“ec

f/

,

TM~

SP =

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

iY
OD

L, ff Visit http://w

Ws. Vth
ww.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Z Whiws

e-
Bit,
a
F
i
i
|
IV!
(
7
a
E
4g
id
4
4
‘?
t

ee

No. of dwellings, _ GB No. of white females, i ae No. of males, foreign born, BS | No. of insane,

© families, ie “ “colored males, .§.—=—s— “ - ** females, “ § Ke

« © white males, SZ + “ females, ce” O° Blind,

|
#### Henry Adolph KELLER, Jr., Appellant, v. Christal Clark KELLER and Margaret Keller, Appellees.

No. 72-1006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 18, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 21, 1974.

Heller & Kaplan, Miami, for appellant.

Koeppel, Stark, Marks & NeWmark, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On this action for divorce brought by the husband, issues relating to alimony and custody of a child of the marriage were contested and extensively litigated. From the judgment entered, the husband appealed seeking reversal of the court’s award of alimony to the wife and challenging as excessive the fee allowed to the wife’s attorneys. Based on cross-assignments of error the defendant wife sought reversal of the ruling of the court awarding custody of the child to the plaintiff.

Upon consideration of the several contentions of the parties, in the light of the record, briefs and argument, we conclude no reversible error has been shown.

The judgment is affirmed.

PEARSON, Judge

(dissenting in part).

The award of only $7,200.00 as alimony to the cross-appellant wife was, in my view, an abuse of discretion. The record shows that the wife has no assets and no income. She has no special skills and does not even have a high school education. The trauma of this marriage and the loss of custody of her child indicate the truth of her contention that she needs to continue under the care of a psychotherapist.

The cross-appellee husband has a stipulated net worth of over $3,000,000.00 and receives a yearly income of over $90,000.-00. The parties met while the prospective wife was working as a grocery store check-out girl. The wife was eighteen; she was married to her husband for seven years and bore him a son.

It is my view that the emancipation of women does not require that this former wife be cast adrift without resources or prospects. I would reverse that portion of the judgment allowing lump sum alimony in the amount of $7,200.00 payable at the rate of $50.00 per week and remand the cause for the assessment of rehabilitative alimony in accordance with the holding in Dash v. Dash, Fla.App.1973, 3rd D.C.A., 284 So.2d 407.

In all other respects, I would affirm the j udgment.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1276 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1276

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2013

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To increase oversight of the Revolving Fund of the Office of Personnel 
                              Management.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Security Clearance Oversight and 
Reform Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. OVERSIGHT OF THE REVOLVING FUND OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 
              MANAGEMENT.

    Section 1304(e) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), in the first sentence, by inserting 
        before the period the following: ``, and for the cost of 
        audits, investigations, and oversight activities relating to 
        the fund and the functions financed by the fund, conducted by 
        the Inspector General of the Office''; and
            (2) in paragraph (5), by adding at the end the following: 
        ``Each budget submitted under this paragraph shall include an 
        estimate from the Inspector General of the Office of the amount 
        required to pay the reasonable expenses to adequately audit, 
        investigate, and perform other oversight activities relating to 
        the fund and the functions financed by the fund for the 
        applicable fiscal year, which shall not exceed 0.33 percent of 
        the total budgetary authority requested in the budget estimates 
        submitted to Congress by the Office for that fiscal year.''.

            Passed the Senate October 10, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# History

###### You are here: Census.gov ›  History ›  FAQs › Geography FAQs › Are historic maps available?

Skip top of page navigation

                - History Main
                - Agency History                    - Director Biographies
                  - Census Facilities
                  - Suitland, MD
                  - Notable Alumni
                - Innovations                    - Data Collection
                  - Technology
                - Programs                    - Agriculture
                  - Demographic
                  - Housing
                  - Economic
                  - Geography
                  - Governments
                - Through the Decades                    - Fast Facts
                  - Overview
                  - Index of Questions
                  - Questionnaires
                  - Census Instructions
                - Genealogy                    - Decennial Census Records
                  - Other Resources
                - Reference                    - Data@Museums
                  - Artifacts
                  - Lesson Plans
                  - Legislation
                  - Maps
                  - Oral Histories
                  - Privacy & Confidentiality
                  - Apportionment
                  - Publications 
                - Home Page Archive                    - 2024
                  - 2023
                  - 2022
                  - 2021
                  - 2020
                  - 2019
                  - 2018
                  - 2017
                  - 2016
                  - 2015
                  - 2014 
                - FAQs                    - Genealogy
                  - Agency History
                  - Demographic
                  - Economic
                  - Governments
                  - Agriculture
                  - Geography
                  - Innovations
                  - Miscellaneous

### Geography FAQs

### Also in this Section:

                          - How does the census help keep me from getting lost?
                          - Are historic maps available?

## Are historic maps available?

The Census Bureau's History Web Site has a number of historic maps available online in its Reference section.  Links to additional resources are also available in this section.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?