alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
; y¥

RB 7-300. |
4 H.D.j B
TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES.
SHEET No. 24 SHEET No: 27:

HONOLULU, pisrricr. CENSUS OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. (Je
a

SPECIAL AGENT No. 74 SCHEDULE No. 1.—POPULATION.
INHABITANTS IN HONOLULU, District, Island of Ba tndl. OAHU, | Name of Institution __

Enumerated by me on the = day of June, 1900, — | ., Special Agent.

PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. NATIVITY. CITIZENSHIP. OCCUPATION, TRADE, OR EDUCATION. OWNERSHIP

LOCATION. NAME RELATION.
PROFESSION OF Home.

of each person whose place of DATE OF
abode on June 1, 1900, was BIRTH.

in this family.

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If born in the Hawaiian Islands, write
Hawaiian Ids.; if born in the United States, give the Stale or Territory; if of foreign birth, give the Country only.

(in

of each person TEN YEARS of age
and ‘over.

Number of years in the

IN CITIES.

» kuleana,

~~ | Number of these children

as VE
ew

> | Months not

3

Place of birth of this Place of birth of Fatuxe Place of birth of Morurr
PERSON, of this person. of this personas

Relationship of each
Enter surname first, then the given name and person to the head
middle initial, if any. of the family.

of dwelling-

honse, in the order of

visitation,

| e Whether single, married,

OccuPATION.

the Hawaiian Islands,

Hawalian Islands,

employed,

Year of immigration to |
months).

Attended sehool

widowed, or divorced,
Naturalized or denizen,

order of visitation,
children,
living.
Can read.
Owned or rented,
Homestead lot
ur house,

IncLupe every person living on June 1, 1900.
Omit children born since June 1, 1900.

Number of years married,
Mother of how many |
| Can speak Hawaiian,

Number of fumily, in the
Age at last birthday,

House Number,

Number
Month.

© | Owned free or mortgaged. |

SLOF3 VY J2/ “ /
“ $ oi
ht... GX | | LAG a cece

&

[SO EFS Wiczxeecn»

Vitter. tere; ge a

YnasLuats ZL geht ft as

OE Sale i zee ces None Meares eh! _.
A. cere uk LACH 2 Dag ths zi

‘Za eee

Lite gar 2
|

elle Ca lca i, V7 Ea” tF | lew Ve é . (Pt ....-|.2_..| (<@ég es

LE. |

24. Fe ke \2
he sail

Ft Mae: pe tere 2.12 Viz Zac Mi | Se sisi Coane zat

_— *

7G ‘

— eee f-EZ-2

t ya . }
ead. ~ GWA | Ct YY a y ae |. Verlag ; a

c+

Loto Ca-|\F | fen HEEB ': So Ue mal | , o | LEG Lb aaat 12h

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.
#### CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Robert HORNSBY, Appellee.

No. 71-353.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 5, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Peter M. OWER, Appellant, v. Carol Ann OWER, Appellee.

No. 70-665.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 1, 1971.

Stephen D. Hughes, Largo, for appellant.

Crockett Farnell, Clearwater, for appel-lee.

*702PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Smith v. Smith, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 448; Katz v. Katz, Fla.App.1964, 159 So.2d 241, and Quarngesser v. Quarngesser, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 875.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
#### George L. JOHNSON v. BATON ROUGE MUNICIPAL FIRE & POLICE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD and Maxie E. Cox, State Examiner of Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service.

No. 12283.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 29, 1978.

Sam J. D’Amico, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-relator.

Charles H. Pilcher, Baton Rouge, for defendant-respondent.

Before LANDRY and ELLIS, JJ.

*1281ORDER

Considering the application for a stay order filed herein by George L. Johnson (Appellant), incident to his appeal:

It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court be stayed pending Appellant’s appeal and that Defendants, Baton Rouge Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board and Maxie E. Cox, State Examiner of Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service, be and they are hereby prohibited and restrained from holding or conducting a Civil Service admissions test for the position of Colonel in the Baton Rouge City Police Department, pending the outcome of this litigation.

It is further ordered that Appellant be and he is hereby ordered and directed to file a brief in this court on or before July 10, 1978, and that Defendants file a brief herein on or before July 25, 1978, whereupon this matter will be considered submitted to this court for decision without oral argument.

It is further ordered that the sole issue to be considered on this appeal is whether Appellant was qualified as of May 22,1978, to take the admission test for the position of Colonel in the Baton Rouge City Police Department and that if found not to be so qualified Appellant shall be ineligible to take the first such test given by Defendants for the above mentioned Civil Service position.

Thus done, rendered and signed at Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 29th day of June, 1978.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 32.2
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Craig J. Kaufmann, Controller and Treasurer of SkyTerra
Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
         December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


                              By:   /s/ CRAIG J. KAUFMANN
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    Name: Craig J. Kaufmann
                                    Title: Controller and Treasurer
                                           (Principal Accounting Officer)
                                    Date: November 10, 2005


     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Dennis BLANCHARD et al. v. Rita Griggs LANIER, Individually etc., et al.

No. 9489.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Aug. 23, 1973.

Horace C. Lane, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellants, Allstate Ins. Co. and State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Dean M. Mosely, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff s-appellees.

Before SARTAIN, BLANCHE and WATSON, JJ.

BLANCHE, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion this day rendered in Appeal No. 9488 in the case entitled “Cara Johnson v. Dennis Blanchard, et al.,” La.App., 283 So.2d 513, the judgment in Appeal No. 9489 is affirmed, with all costs of this appeal assessed to defendants-appellants.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-109345, 333-109346, 33-14531, No. 33-54483, No. 33-64998, No.
33-65440, No. 33-68336, No. 333-04775, No. 333-04823, No. 333-62087, No.
333-62103, No. 333-95409, No. 333-41328, No. 333-71502, No. 333-97713)
pertaining to employee equity compensation plans of Novell, Inc. of
our report dated November 18, 2003, (except for Note T, as to which the date is
January 20, 2004) with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Novell, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2003.

                                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
January 26, 2004
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.44


June 11, 1998


Catherine Saar
1217 West Bay Ave.
Newport Beach, CA 92661

Dear Catherine,

On behalf of Diedrich Coffee (Company), it is with great pleasure that we offer
you the position of Vice President, Marketing. In your role, you will guide
Diedrich Coffee's growth in the development and implementation of brand
development initiatives in marketing, merchandising, wholesale sales and public
relations.

Your cash compensation in this position will consist of $120,000 per annum,
earned and paid ratably on a bi-weekly basis, and an annual incentive of up to
25% versus your base salary, based on the Company's performance and your
performance versus specific objectives set for your areas of responsibility.

In addition to your cash compensation, as defined above, you will be eligible
for stock options under the Company's 1996 Stock Incentive Plan. Your initial
grant for 20,000 stock options will vest 50% annually for two years. During
subsequent years, you may qualify for additional option awards based on the
Company's Option Award Plan and your performance versus specific objectives set
for your areas of responsibility. Your option price for the initial grant of
20,000 shares is set at 7 3/4, the common stock price at close of business on
May 29, 1998.

As part of your employment, the Company will provide for accelerated vesting of
your stock options in the event of a change of control.

Your medical and dental plan (HMO) is a company sponsored plan for you, the
employee, and will be effective on the first day of the month after your start
date.

If Diedrich Coffee terminates your employment for any reason other than fraud or
other illegal acts, you will be eligible for a severance privilege equivalent to
four months of your annual salary. This sum will be paid in four equal
installments.

Catherine, I am very excited at the opportunity to work with you. I am confident
that you will make a difference at Diedrich Coffee.

Sincerely,

/s/ Timothy Ryan
----------------------------------
Timothy Ryan
President
Chief Executive Officer
#### Robert W. LEVY v. MARION COUNTY.

No. 38752.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
si elas f

| \| pepantment oF dowdktee be JagOR-BUREAU OF THE OENAUS’ | 1184 {overnsons onricr wo. SMP A." Bheey Wo:
Blue ache i | THIRTEENTH CENSUS OF) THE, ‘UNITE STATES: 1217 END Enyuerarion err i aig A
a inst oF coun ts, mconrotare fac hi. hea] 5 ‘ano of erty
Tl abe b maak Se ealuabeow orn Oe a Lint feign

{1h
ald
as
1F
a0
Me. |
ap ae
1g.
Le
far isa bsg|
Ka kl i ate
oe aa
Bee te ;
ran fu ¥
el Tiel Ool a Ve
ava i L i
elle Ef fe maa
asl lg: (peal [a ain
va 9 ed 2 laedged Lal sith
var , | Talal alataebe
0G baal ey
Arann baled lal
Eval t
Aid|
E fala, ae ae a al
Ae rade | Berk a
aa | a a :
cat ‘ Me ee — ey a acerata
| bon lis PARE e este |
af ae ral
a. sy elle |e teal To
Waitt
Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Adminstration nat the U.S. Census Bureau. cabal
4 Visi http://w archives.gov for more information about publicly availabe records ike the one shown here. an
: _ aac
HT ee pple piers
Ble 7 el ii ea a
#### James M. HUSTAD and Joan M. Hustad, Appellants, v. EDWIN K. WILLIAMS & CO.—EAST, a corporation doing business as Marcoin Management Services, Appellee.

No. 73-912.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 31, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0390

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JASON AARON CARRYWATER,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pu rsuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Yvonne Laird , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 20 2022

04/20/2022
Case Number: DA 20-0390
Page No. £y a a ee | |
SCHEDULE 1—Free Inhabitants in it rearmt et the County of _4<x’___ State
of —Wlea____ enumerated by-me, on the __ -~--7% day of Lesser 1860, ie Fe Ass’t Marshal.

Description. ) Vatve or Estate Ownen.

re of age
& write.

Whether deaf and

The name of every persen whose usual itm f Profession, Occupation, or Trade of Place of Birth, dumb. blind.;
, ,insane,

place of abode on the first day of June, each person, male and female, over Value of Value of Naming the State, Territory,
1860, was in this family. 15 years of age. ~ Real Estate. Personal - or Country.

-houses—
read

within the
year.
Attended School

idiotic, pauper, or

Estate. convict.

numbered in the
order of visitation..
Families numbered
in the order of
visitation.
within the year.

| Married
Persons over
who cannot

ae

Dwelli

rath 6 vo. ahead i
PA lees retdee sire lAlege tale ke OF 34
=p AT eet Ty ns eae,
PAG

c= gers te
ete? way .
me } Py =

4

—-
i.

se Ne a ng tN a Re a cet =

POON Perak toto ee RL het Pay sre ma Fee Gee Se th OWE Sec eee ys mrt to a dle me

'
_ ote ¢ ’ e Arey ome tbl eine ee
4 ie bet : " ely ae + ¥ -
y r =~

4 =. ou oe \ es ” ms
CDi GmIGSLS perronieits peiceseene een
— ye vey oo Weer

Ep a Nec ae ee he tk ae ae eee
DIVAN EE DSA Perr en DY wah icela eo

da Spee Sey
>
~

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Ca ch miemeetctae
ys = —

rent ee
‘<=

Dee re) ts
ai a ae tol ah ace

—

|

Wa paren we aN ere | eee 59

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

Tuts modi : / i ame - M '
wl is) 2. " % +3 Le et dhe « ), a4 4
wingeneaesnan sem sieren re we EEE NSE INT On ogee commen mete Weenie gat Ass

se, pace
Yi LL a "
Pen Sherk ee
* . : ,

{ 7
PD lly Vem ee | mere
a) a ereeaiet sents ve-eaaeie, tise

es ee

Mile elo ier t i Sor Dee eee Pee
+ yeep tial pirlites sper a Oe RyRR AER err ey onPt re Mii be pet te

MBit aad
‘
he Ao
<. ean a

ssigitepeete ee - eey A steno es

3 Sk hoeetad S,! i 0 mits) ~ é' Ey The, af vee y
sa tar a i ae a 6 a Ve IE a a
ye se { py = eee | om nA ee 1 He Wipe” —»

Spee —

It te. a fie ku’
= Ane | BIR (i

on ‘Se tele B48"

~ ay f Be her ~~

“ ~

ey) at
PIS were eae a:
ta ani ad Mee
forte deh are bere te ey ort “

;

q
es

* ="
’ °

’

|

4 ’
7

uw
na
A
- {,
2 3S

¥

‘

i
i]

—- ~ &

Zih

ae *

+

La

re

P3- 3s

i.

2 he
'
5.
*,

i
2. =e
: ve
ae
4 tt:
o®
4
re
.
rs

+! i

* tg
*3
Pome

= s

=> 'G

Moe:
J}

4
>
.

No. foreign born,
.
No. deaf and dumb, ___
#### Erben SCOTT and Margaret Scott, Appellants, v. ANCHOR INN APARTMENTS, INC., a corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. R-480.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 13, 1973.

S. Thompson Tygart, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellants.

Judson Freeman, Freeman, Richardson, Watson, Slade, McCarthy & Kelly, Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of a final judgment entered at the end of the plaintiffs’ evidentiary case dismissing their action for specific performance of an alleged oral contract.

The alleged contract sought to be enforced related to the number of shares or porportionate ownership that plaintiffs were entitled to in a real estate venture with plaintiff’s brother and his wife.

Following the taking of testimony, the trial court ruled that the evidence as to the respective amount of stock or interest in the venture that each brother and his wife were to have was so conflicting that the plaintiffs had failed to establish the existence of the contract that plaintiffs alleged in their complaint. In essence, the plaintiffs’ evidence was to the effect that they were to have forty-nine percent of the corporate stock and the appellees fifty-one percent, whereas the tenor of the appellees’ evidence given as an adverse witness for the plaintiffs was that appellant Erben Scott was to receive four shares as compared to five shares for each for appellees Allen Scott and his wife, Gloria. The evidence revealed that Erben contributed $2,000.00 for the four shares issued to and received by him and that he loaned the corporation $10,500.00 for which he received a corporate note which has since been paid on his demand. Appellant and his wife also signed the long-term notes and mortgage which financed the corporation’s acquisition of the realty, as did the appellees.

The trial court being confronted with this critical factual conflict correctly declined to grant specific performance. That result is consistent with the rule announced in Humphrys v. Jarrell, Fla.App., 104 So.2d 404, 410, viz:

> “. . . Specific performance is an equitable remedy and is not'granted as a matter of right or grace but as a matter of sound judicial discretion vested in the *641chancellor governed by principles of law and equity applicable to the particular facts or circumstances. The exercise of this discretion by the chancellor must be legally sound and not arbitrary. Moreover, the granting of a final decree in a specific performance suit requires that the proof be clear, competent, and satisfactory. This test imposes a greater degree of proof than that required under the preponderance of evidence rule.

It is obvious that the trial judge did not find that the essential elements necessary to authorize specific performance had been proved with that degree of clarity and certainty to justify granting the relief sought.

Accordingly, the judgment reviewed herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Steven Eugene JORDAN v. O’CONNOR.

No. 36124.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
#### William Lamar ROSE v. THE FLORIDA BAR.

No. 36182.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Petition to cease and desist denied without opinion.
South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178- (909) 396-2000 www.aqmd.gov September 10, 2008 Mafl Haber Deputy Director, Air Division USEPA REGION

9 75 Hawthorne Street Mail Code: AIR-i San Francisco, CA 94105 On-Road Mobile Source Emissions Submittal Dear Mr. Flaber: Per your request, the District staff is submitting anemissions inventory for on-road mobile sourcesto U.S. EPA in order to address the requirements
of CAA section 1 82(d)(1)(A) for the 2003 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the South Coast Air Basin. CAA section 182(d)(i)(A) requires that 1-hour SIPs for severeand above areas should demonstrate that emissions from motor vehiclesdecline each year through 2010, orinclude Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) to offset emission increases. Based. onthe mobile source inventory developed for the 2003 AQMP, the following table demonstrates that from 2003 to 2010, the emissions for VOC and NOx from on-road mobile sourcesdeclined. The emissions presented
in this table do not assume implementation
of anymobile sourcemeasuresincluded in the 2003 AQMP. On-road Mobile Source Emissions (Planning Inventory) VOC NOx Year (tpd) (tpd) 2003
312
609 2004

291

581 2005
270

553 2006

261
536 2007
247
505 2008
234
475 2009
222—444 2010
210
414*Source: Appendix 111,200 AQMP, exceptfor2004 and 2009which wereestimated by interpolationMatt flaber- 2- September 10, 2008

Ifyou haveany questions regarding this submittal, please contactmeat (909) 396-3186. Sincerely,/. Elaine Chang, DrPH / Deputy Executive Officer Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources

EC:EE cc: Barry Wallerstein, SCAQMD Barbara Baird, SCAQMD
MAYOR 

Jason Buckerman 

CITY COUNCIL 

Shirley Sessions, Mayor Pro Tem 

Wanda D. Doyle 

Bin Garbett 

Frank Schumaa, Sr 

Kathryn Williams 

Paul WolfiF 

CITY MANAGER 

Diane Schleicher 

CLERK OP COUNCIL 

Vivian 0. Woods 

CITY ATTORNEY 

Edward M. Hughfs 

CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND 

August 10,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

400 7" Street, SW Room 10200 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Small Community Air Service Development 

Docket OSr-2010-0124, for Savannah/Hilton 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Grant Application 

Head International Airport (SAV) 

C _ ' 

•rzTi 

C O 

' 

i 

XT 

> 

-J? 

IS) 

f v j 

.'• ^ 

)—'-r^IT) 

-'••±'g ^ 

m-y m ^^5 

CO 

As a frequent traveler flying in and gut of Savannah I am pleased to support Savannah/Hilton Head 

International Airport in Its effort to acquire the Department of Transportation's Small Community Air Service 

Development Program Grant. I have long supporteld the Airport's objective of attracting affordable air service 

to our community. The presence of a low-fere carrier at Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport would play 

a major role in satisfying the needs of our community and benefit both Georgia and South Carolina. 

I hope that the highest consideration will be given to the Airport's application for this grant in an effort to 

improve our local air service for the benefit of business and leisure travelers alike. It is crucial that all 

communities have access to a national air transportation system with competitive options without compromise 

by higher average airfares when compared to other communities. 

Sincerely, 

SAVANMAH AIRPORT COMMISSION 

ason Buelterman, Mayor 

Tybee Island, Georgia 

JB/vw 

A nnnnnn 

AUG 1 2 2010 

i kr j u u u UD [j. 

By 

P.O. Box 2749 - 403 Butler Avenue, Tybee.lsland, Georgia31328-2749 

(866) 786-4573- FAX (866) 786-5737 

www tityoftybecorg , f