alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S. C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCo2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended  September 30,
2002 of the Company (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                               /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
                                               -------------------------
                                               Michael E. DeDomenico
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               November 14, 2002
```
Township or other division of county——

Name of incorporated city, town, or village,

LOCATION.

Counties cass aaa an aan |

VP

7—224.

TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES.

SCHEDULE No. 1.—-POPULATION.

ee? oe

Sheet No.

Cee Sas

( Supervisor’s District No. sth.

Mietimsanaiion District No. fd :

Ls

ae ee ee

Enumerated by me on the eee

NAME

..... Name of Institution,

of June, 1900, —--

civil division, as the case may be. See instruct

ai MAN

ee

. [Insert name of township, town, precinct, district, or other

4 Ae a Enumerator.

2h.

eee

ER Kiex:
A

within the above-named division,

Le.

day

EDUCATION. OWNERSHIP OF HOME.

OCCUPATION, TRADE, OR
PROFESSION

NATIVITY. CITIZENSHIP.

RELATION. PERSONAL DESCRIPTION.

7

B

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If born in the United

IN CITIES.

dwelling-
he order of

house, in ¢t

House Number.
visitation,

Street.
Number of

of each person whose place of
abode on June 1, 1900, was
in this family.
Enter surname first, then the given name and
middle initial, if any,

Inctupe every person living on June 1, 1900.
Our children born since June 1, 1900,

Number of family, in the

order of visitation.

the State or Territory; if of foreign birth, give the Country only. of each person TEN YEARS of a ze

and over.

DATE OF States, give

BIRTH.

married,

ivorced,

d

Relationship of each
person to the head
of the family.

Place of birth of Faturr
of this person.

Place of birth of Morner

Place of birth of this
of this person.

PERSON. OccuPaTION.

Month.

widowed, or

childron.

living.

Year of immigration to
tho United States,

Number of years in the
United States,

Naturalization,
employed,
months),

Cau write.

Cun speak English,

Mother of how many

| Attonded echool (in

Number of these children

| z
By
| 4
" €
|$| 4
zis
ys | ¥

ze | =
£ | z
6 | 2% | 28

Number of years married,

$8 | Owned or rented,

1 Montha not

Whether single

7

No

th)
-

| oo | Age at last birthday.

SS

ee Soe — eee

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau

Visit

ww .archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

tO A Aen heh ee

|PLIA!

| 5+ — Er

TH |r 7 |,
, | 9 $6 |
phy HA SEO IT
[FD \36 |

hhy

Io
barvrade bh Vi:

ip

tr t pug oC a

y77 WS | |

A VPH4\F db

O\ 4.
14551

4p Qala CO een

nee ——

yas J
Fi “~~ iy £

by r1t \29| 3
th¢ BS ha

itv

[Aas a es “sf
4

or.

Ss! Ly. PT?
Inet VIN VG

iX y//
(Dlelping a

M4 if Mom rt

eo ay PERT ¢
ifle Art]

->-- ee

F | HAYTART ob) | || ph Gnrt
(5P7 \MO | Yee 7

7 me

Si

an

}

pF eae.

|
TORT |S |}
(BYR ~ 19)

mG | 1

SRR 5

([EERIB lyr

<< ee ee een

— een ee ees

= eS

1349

Us |F los ISI WM actrv€

— ee ee
j ,
}

is Ino phe.

3 ee eee ere

&
(extwte bno-rs-
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 14, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: January 30, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Sean M. McCarthy                      
|                        |  |  |  | Sean M. McCarthy                          
|                        |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Note: A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### HARBOUR TOWER BARBER SHOP et al., Petitioners, v. Eugenia HILLYER et al., Respondents.

No. 40518.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 4, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Dana C. Russell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350), that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * *



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dana C. Russell                              
|Dana C. Russell                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 22, 2009
#### Jullus L. FUNDERBURK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-236.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Order entered March 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01437-CV

EBAY INC., Appellant

V.

ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-01545-2014

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated January 15, 2015, we 

notified the official court reporter for the 296th Judicial District Court that the reporter’s record 

was overdue. We directed the court reporter to file the record within thirty days. To date, we 

have not received any response. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Court Reporter Janet Dugger to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS

of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification that no hearings 

were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has not requested or made payment 

arrangements for the record. We notify appellant that if we receive verification it has not 

requested, paid for, or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, we will order the 
appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                  Exhibit 27.01

                             Financial Data Schedule

                     MULTIMEDIA CONCEPTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                     EXHIBIT
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X


The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements  for the three  months  ended March 31, 1997 and is  qualified in its
entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                    <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      sep-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 591,577
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          757,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            30,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       2,476,905
<PP&E>                                                 29,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                         13,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         7,657,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  589,686
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               3,005
<OTHER-SE>                                             7,065,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           7,657,844
<SALES>                                                220,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       241,272
<CGS>                                                  145,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          145,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       311,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        215,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (215,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (215,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (215,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.07)
        

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### Allen Eric BUTLER, Relator, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-1109.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 12, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus dismissed.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 0 7 0

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 4, 2009

0128 

# Order

February 4, 2009

137421

ROBERT SUTKOWI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137421 COA: 283994 WCAC: 07-000068 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

----

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge: 

1.    this annual report on Form 20-F of BT Group plc fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2.    the information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BT Group plc. 

| Date: May 19 2004 |   | /s/ B. Verwaayen       |
|-------------------|--------|------------------------|
|              | Name:  | Bernardus Verwaayen    |
|              | Title: | Chief Executive        |
|              |   |                   |
| Date: May 19 2004 |   | /s/ I. Livingston      |
|              | Name:  | Ian Livingston         |
|              | Title: | Group Finance Director |

1

----
261 La. 824

#### Donald CORMACK v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.

No. 52392.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 1972.

In re: Donald Cormack applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 255 So.2d 340.

Writ refused. We find no error of law in the Court of Appeal judgment.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should issue. The policy provision as interpreted by the court of appeal gives a benefit for dental treatment that is largely illusory.
262 La. 1074

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Clarion BAY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52637.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 18, 1972.

In re: Clarion Bay applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. Considering the evidenti-ary hearing and the showing made, we find no error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-3
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000759726
<NAME>              P-B/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-3
<MULTIPLIER>        1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          1,089,835

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,089,835

<PP&E>                          275,000

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,364,835

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           220,331

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,144,504

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,364,835

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0<F1>

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0<F1>

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0<F1>

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0<F1>

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0<F1>

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

<FN>
<F1>
Registrant adopted the liquidation basis of accounting
on October 1, 1996, and, accordingly, does not 
reflect operations subsequent to October 1, 1996. See 
Note A to the financial statements for further details.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                      27,505,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              254,714,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,285,388
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             317,514,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    269,091,303
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,567
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,614,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               317,514,597
<SALES>                                     10,989,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,989,191
<CGS>                                        5,090,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,090,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,983,712
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,979,650
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                778,894
<INCOME-TAX>                                   284,296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            494,598
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   494,598
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
IC 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1499 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2013 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 278 Main Street in Chadron, Nebraska, as 

the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1499 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT CORY MRACEK MEMORIAL POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 278 Main Street in Chadron, Ne5 braska, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

6 Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek 

11 Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate November 12, 2013. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Successions of Duffy (Dolphe) Raphael PORCHE and Catherine Louise Loyacano Porche.

No. 53420.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1973.

In re: Duffy R. Porche, Jr. and Dorothy Porche Polozola applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson, 273 So.2d 665.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated November 6, 2000 included in this Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 29, 2000 into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-8, Registration Nos. 33-11818, 33-30879, 33-33329,
33-44002, 33-57825 and 333-53163, and on Form S-3, Registration Nos. 333-53161
and 333-63427.



                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
November 21, 2000