35616 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2018 / Notices 

13See Preliminary Results, 83 FR at 5606. 

14See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). 

15See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 

52265, 52267 (November 13, 2017). 

16See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 

(17) Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., 

Ltd.; (18) Liaoyang Zhongwang 

Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd.; (19) Midea 

International Training Co., Ltd.; (20) 

Midea International Trading Co., Ltd.; 

(21) Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum 

Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (22) 

Sincere Profit Limited; (23) Summit 

Heat Sinks Metal Co, Ltd; (24) USA 

Worldwide Door Components (PINGHU) 

Co., Ltd.; (25) Whirlpool Canada L.P.; 

and (26) Whirlpool Microwave Products 

Development Ltd.13

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.14 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity in the 

instant review, the entity is not under 

review, and the entity’s current rate, i.e., 

86.01 percent,15 is not subject to change. 

Adjustments for Countervailable 

Subsidies 

Because no company established 

eligibility for an adjustment under 

section 777A(f) of the Act for 

countervailable domestic subsidies, for 

these final results, Commerce did not 

make an adjustment pursuant to section 

777A(f) of the Act for countervailable 

domestic subsidies for separate-rate 

recipients. Furthermore, because the 

China-wide entity is not under review, 

we made no adjustment for 

countervailable export subsidies for the 

China-wide entity pursuant to section 

772(c)(1)(C) of the Act. 

Assessment 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

will determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of review in the Federal 

Register. Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice in non-market 

economy (NME) cases, if Commerce 

determines that an exporter under 

review had no shipments of subject 

merchandise, any suspended entries 

that entered under the exporter’s case 

number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will 

be liquidated at the China-wide rate.16

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that received a separate rate 

in a prior segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the exporter-specific rate published for 

the most-recently completed segment of 

this proceeding in which the exporter 

was reviewed; (2) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that established for the China-wide 

entity, which is 86.01 percent; and (3) 

for all non-Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter that supplied that non-Chinese 

exporter with the subject merchandise. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

and/or countervailing duties occurred 

and the subsequent assessment of 

doubled antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Regarding Administrative Protective 

Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing notice 

of these final results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and sections 351.213(h) and 

351.221(b)(5) of Commerce’s 

regulations. 

Dated: July 23, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Adjustment of Liquidation 

Instructions 

Comment 2: Xin Wei/Regal Separate Rate 

5. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–16071 Filed 7–26–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–979] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2015– 

2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) continues to find that 

manufacturers/exporters of crystalline 

silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or 

not assembled into modules (solar cells) 

sold solar products at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

December 1, 2015, through November 

30, 2016. 

DATES: Applicable July 27, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen and Krisha Hill, AD/CVD 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2018 / Notices 35617 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015– 

2016, 83 FR 1018 (January 9, 2018) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2015– 

2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or 

Not Assembled into Modules, From the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the 

Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated 

January 23, 2018 (Tolling Memorandum). All 

deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have 

been extended by three days. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘2015–2016 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Certain Crystalline 

Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not 

Assembled into Modules, from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated May 8, 2018. 

5For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

6See Preliminary Results and accompanying PDM 

at 6. 7See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

comments 2 and 10. 

8See Preliminary Results, 83 FR 1018. 

9See PDM at 4–5. 

10See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties); see also the ‘‘Assessment’’ 

section of this notice, below. 

11See Preliminary Results, 83 FR 1018; see also 

PDM at 11–12. 

Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2769 and (202) 482–4037. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 9, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary results of the 2015–2016 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on solar cells 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China).1 For events subsequent to the 

Preliminary Results, see Commerce’s 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The 

final weighted-average dumping 

margins are listed below in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

Commerce has exercised its discretion 

to toll deadlines for the duration of the 

closure of the Federal Government from 

January 20 through 22, 2018.3 On May 

8, 2018, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), Commerce extended 

the deadline for issuing the final results 

by 60 days,4 postponing the final results 

until July 11, 2018. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is crystalline silicon photovoltaic 

cells and modules, laminates, and 

panels, consisting of crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

partially or fully assembled into other 

products, including, but not limited to, 

modules, laminates, panels and building 

integrated materials.5 Merchandise 

covered by this order is currently 

classified in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

under subheadings 8501.61.0000, 

8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, 

and 8501.31.8000. Although these 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this 

review are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. A list of the 

issues that parties raised, and to which 

we responded in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, follows as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov and to all parties in the 

Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of 

the main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper 

copy and electronic version of the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum are 

identical in content. 

Affiliation and Single Entity 

Determination 

We preliminarily found that 

Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./ 

Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and 

Technology Co., Ltd./Yancheng Trina 

Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd./ 

Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy 

Co., Ltd./Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., 

Ltd./Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. 

are affiliated with Trina Solar (Hefei) 

Science and Technology Co., Ltd., 

pursuant to section 771(33)(F) of the Act 

and that all of these companies should 

be treated as a single entity, i.e., Trina 

Solar (Hefei) Science and Technology 

Co., Ltd. (Trina), pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.401(f)(1)–(2).6 No interested party 

has disputed this treatment, and so 

these findings remain unchanged for 

these final results. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 7

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, and for the reasons explained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

we made revisions to our preliminary 

calculations of the weighted-average 

dumping margin for the mandatory 

respondent Trina. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

that the following eight companies had 

no shipments during the POR: De-Tech 

Trading Limited HK, Dongguan 

Sunworth Solar Energy Co., Ltd., Jiawei 

Solarchina Co., Ltd., Ningbo ETDZ 

Holdings, Ltd., Shenzhen Sungold Solar 

Co., Ltd., Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd., 

Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., 

Ltd., and Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic 

Co., Ltd.8 We did not receive comments 

from interested parties regarding our 

preliminary finding on no shipments. 

Consistent with Commerce’s assessment 

practice in non-market economy cases, 

we completed the review with respect to 

the above-named companies. Based on 

the certifications submitted by the 

aforementioned companies, and our 

analysis of Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) information,9 we 

continue to determine that these 

companies did not have any reviewable 

transactions during the POR. As noted 

in the ‘‘Assessment’’ section below, 

Commerce will issue appropriate 

instructions with respect to these 

companies to CBP based on our Final 

Results.10 In addition, these companies 

will maintain their rate from the most 

recent segment in which they 

participated. 

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

that evidence provided by Trina and 21 

other companies/company groups 

supported finding an absence of both de 

jure and de facto government control, 

and, therefore, we preliminarily granted 

a separate rate to each of these 

companies/company groups.11 We 

received no information since the 

issuance of the Preliminary Results that 

provides a basis for reconsidering these 

determinations with respect to the 

separate rate status of these 22 

companies/company groups. Therefore, 

for the final results, we continue to find 

that these entities are eligible for 

separate rates. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
35618 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2018 / Notices 

12See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). 13See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014–2015, 

82 FR 29033 (June 27, 2017). 14See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

15 Id. 

16See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the POR: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd./Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd./Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd./Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Hubei Trina 

Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Hefei) Science and Technology Co., Ltd ................................................................................ 15.85 

Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................. 15.85 

Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................ 15.85 

ET Solar Energy Limited ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15.85 

Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................. 15.85 

Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co. Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... 15.85 

JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ 15.85 

Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................... 15.85 

JingAo Solar Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................................... 15.85 

LERRI Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (aka LONGi Solar Technology Co. Ltd.) ..................................................................................... 15.85 

Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................. 15.85 

Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................ 15.85 

Risen Energy Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................................... 15.85 

Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................. 15.85 

Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................... 15.85 

Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... 15.85 

Sunpreme Jiaxing Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................................... 15.85 

tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................. 15.85 

Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd/Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................... 15.85 

Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited/Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Baoding 

Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd./Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................. 15.85 

Zhejiang ERA Solar Technology Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 15.85 

Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Limited Liability Company ........................................................................ 15.85 

Commerce’s change in policy 

regarding conditional review of the 

China-wide entity applies to this 

administrative review.12 Under this 

policy, the China-wide entity will not be 

under review unless a party specifically 

requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a 

review of the entity. Because no party 

requested a review of the China-wide 

entity, we did not conduct a review of 

the China-wide entity. Thus, the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the China-wide entity (i.e., 238.95 

percent) is not subject to change as a 

result of this review.13

Assessment 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the publication date of these Final 

Results of review. In accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating 

importer- (or customer-)specific 

assessment rates for the merchandise 

subject to this review. For any 

individually examined respondent 

whose weighted-average dumping 

margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 

percent), Commerce will calculate 

importer- (or customer-)specific 

assessment rates for merchandise 

subject to this review. Where the 

respondent reported reliable entered 

values, Commerce calculated importer- 

(or customer-)specific ad valorem rates 

by aggregating the dumping margins 

calculated for all U.S. sales to the 

importer (or customer) and dividing this 

amount by the total entered value of the 

sales to the importer (or customer).14

Where Commerce calculated an 

importer- (or customer-)specific 

weighted-average dumping margin by 

dividing the total amount of dumping 

for reviewed sales to the importer (or 

customer) by the total sales quantity 

associated with those transactions, 

Commerce will direct CBP to assess 

importer- (or customer-)specific 

assessment rates based on the resulting 

per-unit rates.15 Where an importer- (or 

customer-)specific ad valorem or perunit rate is greater than de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to collect 

the appropriate duties at the time of 

liquidation. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, or an 

importer- (or customer-)specific ad 

valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de 

minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate appropriate entries without 

regard to antidumping duties.16

For merchandise whose sale/entry 

was not reported in the U.S. sales 

database submitted by an exporter 

individually examined during this 

review, but that entered under the case 

number of that exporter (i.e., at the 

individually-examined exporter’s cash 

deposit rate), Commerce will instruct 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2018 / Notices 35619 

17See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion 

of this practice. 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty, Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 83 FR 9284 

(March 5, 2018). 

2See Letter from ATC, ‘‘Certain New Pneumatic 

Off-the-Road Tires from India: ATC Tires Private 

Limited’s Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated March 30, 2018. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 

19215 (May 2, 2018). 

4See Letter from ATC, ‘‘Certain New Pneumatic 

Off-the-Road Tires from India: ATC Tires Private 

Limited’s Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated May 17, 2018. 

China-wide rate. Additionally, if 

Commerce determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number will be 

liquidated at the China-wide rate.17

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the Final Results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of this notice in the 

Federal Register, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate listed for each 

exporter in the table in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice, except if the rate is zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), then 

the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters that received a 

separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate previously established for the 

PRC-wide entity (i.e., 238.95 percent); 

and (4) for all non-China exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied the nonChinese exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these Final Results within 

five days of publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: July 11, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix—Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1. Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Partial Adverse Facts Available to 

Trina’s Unreported Factors of Production 

for Purchased Solar Cells 

Comment 2. Ministerial Error Allegations 

Comment 3. Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the U.S. Price for ‘‘USDUTYU’’ 

Expenses 

Comment 4. Whether Commerce Should 

Include Trina’s Sale to a Salvage 

Company in the Margin Calculation 

Comment 5. Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust U.S. Price for the Export Buyer’s 

Credits Program 

Comment 6. Zero-Quantity Import Data 

Comment 7. Surrogate Value for 

Aluminum Frames 

Comment 8. Surrogate Value for 

International Freight 

Comment 9. Surrogate Value for Nitrogen 

Comment 10. Selection of Surrogate 

Financial Statements 

Comment 11. Surrogate Value for Labor 

Comment 12. Separate Rate Status for 

LONGi Solar Technology Co. Ltd. 

Comment 13. Differential Pricing 

Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–16072 Filed 7–26–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–869] 

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires From India: Notice of Rescission 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2017–2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR 

Tires) from India for the period of 

review (POR) February 2, 2017, through 

February 28, 2018. 

DATES: Applicable July 27, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Trisha Tran, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4852. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 5, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the AD order 

on OTR Tires from India for the period 

February 2, 2017, through February 28, 

2018.1 On March 30, 2018, ATC Tires 

Private Limited (ATC) and Alliance 

Tires Americas, Inc. (ATA) (collectively 

ATC) timely requested that Commerce 

conduct an administrative review of this 

AD order with respect to ATC.2 No 

other party requested a review of the 

order. On May 2, 2018, Commerce 

initiated an administrative review with 

respect to ATC, in accordance with 

section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i).3 On May 17, 2018, ATC 

timely withdrew its request for an 

administrative review.4 No other party 

requested a review of ATC. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1