alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Eugene BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-273.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

*Nov.*1, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON, and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### ALFIES, INC., a Florida corporation, and Alfred Mart, Appellants, v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, and Earl Faircloth, as Attorney General of the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 67-585.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 12, 1968.

Rehearing Denied April 8, 1968.

A. Michael Clein, Miami, Leonard R. Mellon Tallahassee, for appellants.

*127Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Stephen Marc Slepin (Tallahassee), Asst. Atty. Gen., Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Peters v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel., Fla.1954, 70 So.2d 547; Green v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel., Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 310; Ames v. Ames, Fla.App. 1963, 153 So.2d 737; Goldstein v. Pettinger, Fla.App. 1966, 183 So.2d 740.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,034,613               4,038,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,734,519              12,292,974
<PP&E>                                         307,616                 395,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,576                 163,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,450,294              19,191,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,380,876               1,626,725
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       31,391,182              42,191,181
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       240,736                 240,590
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,562,500              24,867,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,450,294              19,191,416
<SALES>                                        933,565               1,053,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               933,565               1,053,620
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,135,365              61,640,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,319,627               4,775,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,661                   4,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,469,213)            (65,073,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,709               (802,211)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,498,922)            (64,271,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,498,922)            (64,271,787)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)                  (1.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES.

PHSPOPOLATION, (ar

SCHEDULE N

When

2 Fon other division of county. hfe iormemee =a ae — Name of. tio
“Mame of incorporated city, town, or village, within the above-named tron ile — wm Waar of ity Xn
Enumerated by me on the (tay of Sine, 7000, Gecsrata AM Deuylaz.., Enumerate.
TEEATON TERNAL DEACRORON COOOrEEpEEPE on | aDvONTION
Eg i ltt iff tech pester umn tase | |
ere BIER IL] mameeee
AitAedbe ‘nldealap 26a! Haifa tere
Lge \ed\P\asaaler7a\2e 22
ane fe da isl C
AL. Asoc ud
(oer 3 |
A EN a |
a Sdtdin Fes ew ssn Cada, Fee
ess as
oa arom ric Gad F a
Vig ante ee Hed, mA | bee
& (EF. as |Zceert _ _ |
Be Ae | Se, es ik oi
| a Klay! a lend a23s i ed:
p aH Keefe WA Fed ters 04 2) Kasecheidce
Zt Brasles Cae | alaut| i) ew, amar WAP
Celhanives| Least} tty 1(\ Ul, ener. 0| *
< Hg?! ak|  Leracead= 0} _|
Cale | fal ¢ atl eeeeree
fees... Bprbllt. AAA sLeweint...1.0
_ Cverdt \eve/a) wil evant | 0
ust lat|  ece¥ | O|
Bn ee oe a I ea at| Leech | 0
on Meh 1886, 99) fi "ty| 6 at. Len @
OC pebleg| chaste | ol ran rastion| | 62] “foro leal ra
autre Geidlsiog Hole aca liecalaals| | | | Breehcwced | Eceplensed. . beapdinsed..Viyd (0 ae|.. Learn... 9.
teldee |arlae Po hind ad laud VP9s| Tat} ieretarg | 0
Ley | teal roel ese 30 Pr Bhi 7 ft t 7) i Arta! o
Gg, ahd, ed A Yew €6297| _|. | keaallaang uke 09) 1 Net. tO.
~ i “hrs eek PRILZ (0 le esha Cuadul  Cuelitn! \euig \aj| Wuscenader |
basta tad | buateud ty? lull veer 6
et Veestoel pecklael ( lly.
7434 cw, gf
de se z ipethe ime
PREC. awed feeble hd > 4
124 7601 | So x4 | kiythawg \rolis tal Garvier a
E Mende S Lowy Giscad” sc Qe —|0
4 e L tod ofa lee ert S| LN Deel | Nyplecca | Uelacced. beyris Pal.
Oo Pe ee ee gee la
i VR PRA Dosen VO edo Wise halen ol oT Talk Witereheon | DesaTock erols/ i oO i

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Ges ES EZ

(2 is
lscaonmn zat
airs

ei
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 63853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22138]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment for Land Exchange at New 
Bedford Airport in New Bedford, MA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47153(d), notice is 
being given that the FAA is considering a request from New Bedford 
Airport in New Bedford, MA, to exchange .65 acres of airport land for 
1.14 acres of land owned by the Tifereth Israel Congregation in order 
to construct the Runway Safety Area and provide for a maintenance/
emergency road for Runway 14-32 at New Bedford Airport in New Bedford, 
MA.
    The .65 acres of airport land being exchanged by the airport is not 
required for current of future aviation use. The land is remote, non-
contiguous to the airport land and is primarily wooded. The two parcels 
that will be acquired from Tifereth Israel Congregation will be used to 
meet FAA design requirements for the Runway 14 Runway Safety Area and 
provide a maintenance/emergency access road for this runway end.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 17, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the instructions on providing comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents 
by contacting the FAA at the address listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and 
Land Use Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration New England Region 
Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts, 
Telephone 781-238-7618.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 6, 2016.
Mary T. Walsh,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-22138 Filed 9-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
```
#### In the Matter of Carlos Castanon, Appellant, v Ruben Franco, as Chair of the New York City Housing Authority, et al., Respondents.

[736 NYS2d 337]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (William McCooe, J.), entered March 15, 2000, which dismissed the petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination dated April 17, 1996 overruling a hearing officer’s decision dated September 14, 1995 and denying petitioner’s remaining family member grievance, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as the hearing officer’s decision, finding that petitioner was entitled to succeed to the Housing Authority tenancy of his late mother, was contrary to law, respondent’s determination overruling that decision was not “ ‘arbitrary and capricious, affected by error of law or an abuse of discretion’ ” and, accordingly, may not be judicially disturbed *(Matter of Kaphan v DeBuono,*268 AD2d 909, 911). Petitioner failed to meet the requirements to succeed to a public housing lease as a remaining family member since, in light of his incarceration in Massachusetts for what would be equivalent to a class D New York felony within five years of his succession application, he was “not otherwise eligible” for a public housing tenancy *(see,*New York City Housing Authority Management Manual, ch VII, § E [1]; ch I, § H [2] [a] [2]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, respondent has the right to impose screening and eligibility requirements for remaining family member claimants *(see, Matter of Faison v New York City Hous. Auth.,*283 AD2d 353).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Buckley and Marlow, JJ.
#### Patricia Ann JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Stella B. Hoffman, Respondents.

No. 40838.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Your comment was submitted successfully!

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Other: The Boeing Company - Exemption/Rulemaking

For related information, Open Docket Folder 

3

Your Receipt

Your Comment Tracking Number: 1jy-8fu0-

cwru

Your comment may be viewable on 

Regulations.gov once the agency has reviewed 

it. This process is dependent on agency public 

submission policies/procedures and processing 

times. Use your tracking number to find out 

the status of your comment. 

Email Receipt

Your comment:

Comment:

The attached PDF file contains a petition for revisions to Exemption 8825C and is 

intended to supersede the petition for renewal submitted on August 29, 2014, via 

Boeing letter 9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-14-0562. However, due to the limited time remaining 

before the current Exemption 8825C expires (1/31/2015), Boeing is amenable to 

continuing with the renewal process requested by letter 9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-14-0562 

and following with the revisions requested with this submittal in Boeing letter 9R-TEBBXA-BRB-14-0769.

Uploaded File(s) (Optional)

This information will appear on 

Regulations.gov:

First Name:

Colin

Last Name:

City:

Seattle

Country:

This information will not appear on 

Regulations.gov:

Email Address:

colin.s.fender@boe

ing.com

colin.s.fender@boeing.com

• 9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-14-0769_Exempt 8825 Renew_120214.pdf: success

Regulations.gov - Your Receipt Page 1 of 2

http://www.regulations.gov/ 12/2/2014
Fender

Mailing Address:

The Boeing 

Company

Mailing Address 

2:

P.O. Box 3707, 

M/C 14-KF

United States

State or 

Province:

WA

ZIP/Postal Code:

98124-2207

Phone Number:

206-544-1974

Fax Number:

206-544-9875

Use 

this 

field 

to 

identify 

yourself 

or 

your 

comment 

(e.g. 

Individual, 

Academic, 

or 

Industry)

This 

information 

will 

allow 

an 

agency 

to 

contact 

you 

if 

they 

have 

any 

follow 

up 

questions 

about 

your 

comment

Enter 

your 

name 

or 

if 

you 

prefer 

not 

to 

be 

identified 

this 

field 

will 

subsequently 

populate 

with 

"Anonymous"

Enter 

your 

name 

or 

if 

you 

prefer 

not 

to 

be 

identified 

this 

field 

will 

subsequently 

populate 

with 

"Anonymous"

The 

government 

agency 

that 

the 

submitter 

represents

The 

government 

agency 

that 

the 

submitter 

represents

The 

type 

of 

government 

agency 

that 

the 

submitter 

represents

This 

attribute 

refers 

to 

the 

organization 

that 

is 

submitting 

a 

comment 

on 

a 

federal 

agency's 

regulatory 

action

This 

information 

will 

allow 

an 

agency 

to 

contact 

you 

if 

they 

have 

any 

follow 

up 

questions 

about 

your 

comment

Someone 

who 

is 

submitting 

a 

comment 

on 

behalf 

of 

another 

individual

(s) 

or 

entity

Please 

agree 

to 

the 

disclaimer 

before 

submitting 

your 

comment

Regulations.gov - Your Receipt Page 2 of 2

http://www.regulations.gov/ 12/2/2014
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2022

No. 04-20-00267-CV

Joe Jesse PONCE III,

Appellant

v.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-04768

Mary C. Brown, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On May 25, 2022, we issued a memorandum opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment 

that, among other things, disbarred appellant. Since then, we have granted appellant five 

extensions of time to file a motion for rehearing. The last extension fixed a deadline of 

November 4, 2022. In our order granting appellant a fifth extension of time, we cautioned that 

“no further extensions of time for this filing will be entertained.” On November 7, 2022, 

appellant filed a letter stating that he became ill the previous week and stating: “I’m also having 

issues with my computer. I will try to use Fed X [sic] to electronically send my Motion for 

Rehearing.” We construe appellant’s letter as his sixth motion for extension of time. 

Appellant’s sixth motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2022.

_________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
        Andrew
        A. Farina, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”),
        certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, that:
  (1)           the
        Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
        year
        ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
        78m or
        780(d)); and
  (2)           the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
        October 29, 2007
 
 /s/  ANDREW
                  A. FARINAAndrew
                  A. Farina,Principal
                  Financial Officer
#### In re Virgil BROADWAY v. STATE. Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

SC 713.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 21, 1974.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Charles R. Hare, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Albertville, for the State, petitioner.

No brief for the respondent.

HARWOOD, Justice.

Petition of the State by its Attorney General for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Broadway v. State, 52 Ala.App. 249, 291 So.2d 338.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, MADDOX and FAULKNER, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission's website (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012429-003.                

*Agreement Name:*                     THE Alliance Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Hapag Lloyd AG & Hapag-Lloyd USA, LLC (acting as a single party); Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.; and Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation & Yangming (UK) Ltd. (acting as a single party).                

*Filing Party:*                     Joshua Stein, Cozen O'Connor.                

*Synopsis:*                     The Amendment authorizes the Parties to increase the amount contributed by each party to the contingency fund after the transition from five Parties to three, and deletes provisions that are no longer necessary since the transition of membership from the three Japanese lines to Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. The Parties have requested Expedited Review.                

*Proposed Effective Date:*                     9/1/2018.                

*Location: http://fmcinet/​Fmc.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​1912*.                

Dated: July 19, 2018.

Rachel Dickon,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-15809 Filed 7-23-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-109345, 333-109346, 333-38435, 333-02879, 33-48395, 33-54483, 333-04775, 333-04823, 333-62087, 333-62103, 333-95409, 333-41328,333-71502, 333-97713 and 333-158454) of Novell, Inc. of our report dated December 22, 2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

December 22, 2009
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1006 

To preserve existing rights and responsibilities with respect to waters of 

the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. VITTER, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. COATS, Mr. RISCH, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Mr. WICKER, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. ENZI, Mr. HELLER, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. HATCH, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. LEE, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, 

Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. BURR, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. SCOTT, 

Mr. FLAKE, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. COBURN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 

and Public Works 

A BILL 

To preserve existing rights and responsibilities with respect 

to waters of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserve the Waters 

5 of the United States Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1006 IS

1 SEC. 2. IDENTIFICATION OF WATERS PROTECTED BY THE 

2 CLEAN WATER ACT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Neither the Secretary of the Army 

4 nor the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

5 Agency shall— 

6 (1) finalize the proposed guidance described in 

7 the notice of availability and request for comments 

8 entitled ‘‘EPA and Army Corps of Engineers Guid9 ance Regarding Identification of Waters Protected 

10 by the Clean Water Act’’ (EPA–HQ–OW–2011– 

11 0409) (76 Fed. Reg. 24479 (May 2, 2011)); or 

12 (2) use the guidance described in paragraph 

13 (1), or any substantially similar guidance, as the 

14 basis for any decision regarding the scope of the 

15 Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 

16 1251 et seq.) or any rulemaking. 

17 (b) RULES.—The use of the guidance described in 

18 subsection (a)(1), or any substantially similar guidance, 

19 as the basis for any rule shall be grounds for vacation 

20 of the rule. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### J-M POULTRY PACKING CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 6487.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 24, 1978.

Daniel E. Broussard, Jr., Stephen E. Everett, Gold, Little, Simon, Weems & Bruser; Henry B. Bruser, III, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

William J. Doran, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.

Before GUIDRY, FORET and CUTRER, JJ.

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of *Guin v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways et al.,*our Docket No. 6486, 360 So.2d 1185, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

AFFIRMED.
CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW -2014-0598

DCN: SGE00110

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.