alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing of the Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. Form
10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended April 30, 2003, each of the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd.



/s/ Dr. Lionel L. Reilly
------------------------
President/Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Neal B. Soderquist
----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
#### Antonio G. FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1359.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 23, 1974.

Phillip Hubbart, Public Defender, and Eva Weisner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Linda C. Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and conviction in this cause must be reversed because the trial court has certified that due to the death of the court reporter who took the testimony, and the inability of counsel and the trial court to reconstruct a record, the Clerk is unable to prepare the necessary record that would be needed in order to review the errors assigned.

Therefore, the appellant be and he is hereby granted a new trial, pursuant to the authority of Simmons v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 200 So.2d 619; Yancey v. State, Fla. App.1972, 267 So.2d 836.

Reversed and remanded with directions.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Novell, Inc. of our report dated December 12, 1995, included in the
1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of Novell, Inc.
 
     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Novell, Inc.,
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-14531, No. 33-29798, No. 33-31299, No. 33-36673, No.
33-41719, No. 33-48395, No. 33-54483, No. 33-64998, No. 33-65440, No. 33-66704,
No. 33-67276 and No. 33-68336) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option and Stock
Purchase Plans of Novell, Inc. of our report dated December 12, 1995, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by
reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to
the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Novell, Inc.
 
                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
San Jose, California
January 22, 1996
 
                                       22
#### In re TRUST under Will of Edward M. HYZER, Deceased. David BIGELOW, Appellant, v. Robert HYZER and William G. Hyzer, Appellees.

No. 72-400.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 31, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### DUNES DEVELOPMENT CORP., INC., Petitioner, v. John R. TRINKLE, Jr., Respondent.

No. 43652.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 274 So.2d 610.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate for Military Reservist Economic Injury Disaster Loans (13 CFR 123.512) on a quarterly basis. The rate will be 3.675 for loans approved on or after July 27, 2018.

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2018-15650 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certifications**
I, Dennis R. Wolters, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Day International Group, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
    a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date:May 13, 2005 By:           /s/ Dennis R Wolters      Dennis R. Wolters  President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
〇.〇〇〇l 

# ○占○昭一 〇.〇〇〇N 〇.〇〇〇の 

## tOuOm00N.}0」山ト』 〇.〇〇〇寸
〇.〇寸 〇.〇N 〇.〇∞ 〇.〇u
#### Edward Miller ELLISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-924.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 4, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,572,646               4,038,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,696,961              12,292,974
<PP&E>                                         267,742                 395,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 119,690                 163,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,310,221              19,191,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,284,102               1,626,725
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       31,391,182              42,191,181
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       240,736                 240,590
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,605,799              24,867,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,310,221              19,191,416
<SALES>                                        938,665               1,053,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               938,665               1,053,620
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,770,609              61,640,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,786,819               4,775,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,661                   4,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,528,550)            (65,073,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,138               (802,211)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,505,412)            (64,271,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,505,412)            (64,271,787)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)                  (1.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstInvestors Financial Services, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tommy A. Moore, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

(2)                   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Date: Sept 8,2005

 

 
|   | By: /s/ Tommy A. Moore, Jr. |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Tommy A. Moore, Jr.         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer          |

 

----
#### Robert Louis BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2023.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 25, 1977.

Albert L. Carricarte, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Lawson v. State,*251 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); *State v. Hanigan,*312 So.2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); *State v. Butler,*325 So.2d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

KENNAN EASLEY,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 290 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Memorandum 

Opinion and Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 2237 CD 

2015 entered on June 23, 2016, 

affirming the Order Dated of the Board 

of Probation & Parole at Nos. JY-8670 

and Parole No. 256-GA entered on 

October 16, 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and this matter is 

REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration in light of Pittman v. 

Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, __ A.3d __, 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. filed 

April 26, 2017).
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1214 

AN ACT 

To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the 

United States of America for use by the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1214 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘All-American Flag 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PURCHASE OF DOMESTICALLY 

5 MADE UNITED STATES FLAGS FOR USE BY 

6 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under sub8 section (b), only such flags of the United States of Amer9 ica, regardless of size, that are 100 percent manufactured 

10 in the United States, from articles, materials, or supplies 

11 100 percent of which are grown, produced, or manufac12 tured in the United States, may be acquired for use by 

13 the Federal Government. 

14 (b) WAIVER.—The head of an executive agency may 

15 waive the requirement under subsection (a) on a case-by16 case basis upon a determination that— 

17 (1) the application of the limitation would cause 

18 unreasonable costs or delays to be incurred; or 

19 (2) application of the limitation would adversely 

20 affect a United States company. 

21 (c) AMENDMENT OF FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGU22 LATION.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

23 enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory 

24 Council established under section 1302 of title 41, United 

25 States Code, shall amend the Federal Acquisition Regula26 tion to implement this section. 
3 

†S 1214 ES

1 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

2 (1) EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term ‘‘executive 

3 agency’’ has the meaning given the term in section 

4 133 of title 41, United States Code. 

5 (2) FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION.—The 

6 term ‘‘Federal Acquisition Regulation’’ has the 

7 meaning given the term in section 106 of title 41, 

8 United States Code. 

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 Section 2 shall apply to purchases of flags made on 

11 or after 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

12 Act. 

13 SEC. 4. CONSISTENCY WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREE14 MENTS. 

15 This Act shall be applied in a manner consistent with 

16 United States obligations under international agreements. 

Passed the Senate September 16, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1214 

AN ACT 

To require the purchase of domestically made flags 

Federal Government. of the United States of America for use by the
Customer Service Hotline: 1 - 800 - 438 - 2474 UNITED ST AT ES ENVIRONMENT AL PROTECTION A GENCY REGION III 1650 A rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 - 2029 September 16, 2010 Mr. George S. Aburn, Jr., Director Mary land Department of the Environment Air and Radiation Management Administration 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21230 Dear Mr. Aburn: On April 23, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Mary land State Implementation Plan (SI P) from the Mary land Department of t he Environment (MDE). The SI P revision pertains to the adoption of EPA’s Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) for flat wood paneling coatings, and includes amendments to Regulation .32 and new Regulation .33 under COMAR 26.11.19

– Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes. On June 3, 2010, EPA received Errata from MDE to this SI P correcting a codification error to the new Regulation COMAR 26.11.19.33. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically

complete, and is review ing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. If members of your staff have an y questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory Becoat, at (215) 814

- 2036. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerel y, /s/ Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division cc: Brian Hug, MDE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


            LETTER TO THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T



                       ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM II-2, L.P.
                           12405 Powerscourt Drive
                          St. Louis, Missouri 63131







                                March 29, 2002




Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        Pursuant to temporary note 3T, Enstar Income Program II-2, L.P. has
obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen stating that the
December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their quality control system for the
U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit,
and availability of national office consultation.  Availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen was not relevant to the audit.

                              Very truly yours,

                              ENSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
                                CORPORATION, General Partner of
                                Enstar Income Program II-2, L.P.



                              By: /s/   Paul E. Martin
                                ---------------------------------
                                Name:   Paul E. Martin
                                Title:  Vice President and Corporate
                                        Controller (Principal Financial Officer
                                        and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### William B. MILLS, as Trustee under the Last Will and Testament and Codicils thereto of Alfred I. duPont, Deceased, Appellant, v. Edward BALL, J. C. Belin, T. S. Coldewey, Alfred duPont Dent, W. L. Thornton, Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville, as Trustees under the Last Will and Testament and Codicils thereto of Alfred I. duPont, Deceased, T. Edward Austin, Jr., State Attorney in and for the Fourth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida and the Nemours Foundation, a corporation organized under the laws of Florida, Appellees.

No. II-50.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 30, 1978.

*1209John H. Wilbur and Christine Rieger Milton, of Milam & Wilbur, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Claude Ogilvie, Jacksonville, for appellee, The Nemours Foundation.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court denying a motion of appellant, William B. Mills (a defendant below) to dismiss and to strike a cross-claim filed by appellee, The Nemours Foundation, (a defendant below) and treating the cross-claim as affirmative defenses. This is a declaratory judgment action which was brought by Edward Ball and other trustees under the Last Will and Testament and Codicils of Alfred I. duPont, deceased, against Mills, also a trustee under said Will and Codicils. The Nemours Foundation, beneficiary under the aforesaid Will and Codicils was also made a defendant in the cause. The petition for declaratory judgment of Ball and other trustees seeks a judicial declaration as to the validity of an increase in the number of trustees and the actions of the trustees — Ball contending that the trustees were validly selected and their actions were legal and Mills contending to the contrary. By its cross-claim which the trial court designated and treated as affirmative defenses, Nemours, in support of the validity of the selection of the additional trustees and their acts subsequent thereto, raises questions of estoppel, waiver, and res judicata against Mills’ contention to the contrary. In a sense these affirmative defenses are directed to Mills, but in reality they are directed to the cause of action itself and are questions which should properly be ruled upon in this proceeding. While this pleading in this declaratory judgment action is not in compliance with strict rules of pleading, we consider, as did the trial judge, that these are questions which Nemours should be allowed to raise and have determined in this suit. The ruling of the trial court is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., MILLS, J., and McLANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Rare Medium Group, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Rare Medium Group, Inc. Nos. 33-37036, 33-37037, 33-85634, 33-85636, 33-89122,
33-89124 and 333-76957 on Form S-8, and the registration statements Nos.
333-76107, 333-95829 and 333-30170 on Form S-3, of our reports dated February
14, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Rare Medium Group, Inc.
as of December 31, 1998 and 1999 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), cash flows and financial statement
schedule for the years then ended which reports are included in the annual
report on Form 10-K.

                                          /S/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
February 22, 2000
#### Roy YOUNG et ux. v. Richard J. CLEMENT, M. D., et al.

No. 62789.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1978.

In re: Roy Young et ux., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Calcasieu. 359 So.2d 1070.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.