alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1442 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1442

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
 minimum low-income housing tax credit rate for unsubsidized buildings 
 and to provide a minimum 4 percent credit rate for existing buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2013

  Ms. Cantwell (for herself, Mr. Roberts, Ms. Collins, Mr. King, Mr. 
Cardin, Mr. Brown, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Franken, 
   Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Harkin, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Whitehouse, Mrs. 
  Feinstein, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Schatz, Ms. Warren, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 
Markey, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
 minimum low-income housing tax credit rate for unsubsidized buildings 
 and to provide a minimum 4 percent credit rate for existing buildings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving the Low Income Housing Tax 
Credit Rate Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF MINIMUM LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX 
              CREDIT RATE FOR CERTAIN BUILDINGS.

    (a) Permanent Extension.--Paragraph (2) of section 42(b) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Temporary minimum credit rate'' in the 
        heading and inserting ``Minimum credit rate'', and
            (2) by striking ``with respect to housing credit dollar 
        amount allocations made before January 1, 2014'' in 
        subparagraph (A).
    (b) Minimum 4 Percent Credit Rate for Certain Existing Buildings.--
Subsection (b) of section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4), and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(3) Minimum credit rate for non-federally subsidized 
        existing buildings.--In the case of any existing building--
                    ``(A) which is placed in service by the taxpayer 
                after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, and
                    ``(B) which is not federally subsidized for the 
                taxable year,
        the applicable percentage shall be not less than 4 percent.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to buildings placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Memorandum to File

Subject: Meeting with CalPortland on Proposed Reasonable Progress FIP

From: Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division

To: File

Date: March 26, 2014

Participants: 

CalPortland: Jay Grady Director, Environmental Affairs, CalPortland

 Bruce Shafer, Senior VP Cement Operations, CalPortland

 Wayne Nastri, Co-President, E4 Strategic Solutions, Inc.

 Howard Berman, Co-President, E4 Strategic Solutions, Inc.

EPA: Deborah Jordan, Director, Air Division, EPA Region 9 

 Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division 

 Eugene Chen, Engineer, Permits Office

 Shaheerah Kelly, Engineer, Permits Office

 Thomas Webb, Project Lead, Planning Office

 Charlotte Withey, Attorney-Advisor, Office of Regional Counsel

 

Summary: Representatives of CalPortland went over their comments on the proposed FIP in 

advance of submittal. They went over several areas in EPA’s technical analysis where they 

asserted that EPA had made errors. Their overall position was that no controls should be 

required at CalPortland because the visibility benefits are minimal. Their major points were:

 They did not want the option of an annual tonnage limit (cap) because it would limit 

production.

 They believed EPA had made errors in its modeling. CalPortland redid the modeling 

with revised inputs and planned to submit that as part of its comments.
 CalPortland asserted that a 50% control efficiency number was too high and EPA should 

use a 35% control efficiency number because the kiln was a retrofit design.

 CalPortland planned to submit revised cost information with its formal comments
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1348 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1348

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Award Program 
Reauthorization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION.

    Section 108 of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 808) is 
amended by striking ``October 1, 2013'' and inserting ``October 1, 
2018''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect as of October 1, 2013.

            Passed the Senate September 26, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1348

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

YOUNG WOMEN’S CHRISTIAN

ASSOCIATION OF EL PASO

DEL NORTE,

Appellant,

v.

JEREMY JORDAN,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00302

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2014

- DCV1190)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Appellant, Young Women’s Christian

Association of El Paso Del Norte, to dismiss the appeal pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1 because

the dispute between the parties has been resolved . We grant the motion and dismi ss the appeal

.

Costs of th e appeal are taxed against the party incurring same

. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1 (d)

.

May 15, 2015

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, J J.

Hughes, J., not participating
#### Billy ROQUE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41311.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 26, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 249 So.2d 712.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 5424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01730]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday February 1, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stacy Yochum, 202-418-5157.

Stacy D. Yochum,
Counsel to the Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-01730 Filed 1-23-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### William D. McDANIEL, Sr., Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. L-262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 23, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 23, 1969.

Antinori, Cazin, Cohen & Thury, Tampa, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of a judgment of conviction based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree murder with a recommendation of mercy.

Petitioner challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the essential element of premeditation. Although the evidence adduced for the purpose of proving the fact of premeditation is circumstantial, there is sufficient competent evidence in the record from which the jury might lawfully have inferred beyond a reasonable doubt that petitioner shot the deceased with the premeditated design to effect her death.1

Secondly, petitioner contends that the manifest weight of the evidence establishes that either he was so intoxicated at the time of the homicide that he could not have entertained any intent to commit the offense for which he has been convicted, or that he was legally insane at the time of the murder and therefore not responsible for his act. Both the lay and expert testimony on these points of contention are in irreconcilable conflict. The record reveals competent evidence, which, if believed, would be sufficient to support the' jury’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt that petitioner was sane at the time he committed the crime with which he was charged, and was not so intoxicated that he did not know the nature and consequences pf.the act he was about to commit.

The last point urged by petitioner has been carefully considered, but found to be without substantial merit.

In our review of the issues presented for decision we have given due consideration to the applicable principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches this court clothed with a presumption of correctness. It is not our province to substitute our judgment for that of the trier of *857the facts. These findings will not he disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous.2 The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

1

. Larry v. State (Fla.1958), 104 So.2d 352.

2

. Parrish v. State (Fla.App.1957), 97 So.2d 356.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00312-CV

Marcel MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

GOLD STANDARD PLUMBING, LLC,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-17644

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2020

JUDGMENT SET ASIDE AND REMANDED

On March 17, 2020, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Marcel Martinez and Appellee/CrossAppellant Gold Standard Plumbing, LLC filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” The parties 

assert that they have reached an agreement to settle their dispute and request that the judgment of 

the trial court be set aside and the cause remanded to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in 

accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the final 

judgment of the trial court signed on February 14, 2019, and corrected on March 20, 2019, is set 
04-19-00312-CV

- 2 -

aside without regard to the merits, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for rendition of 

judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

PER CURIAM
#### Donald D. BARNES v. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 36122.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
#### Dorothy Westlake HULSEY, Appellant, v. The ESTATE of M. J. HULSEY, Jr., a/k/a Marion Jennings Hulsey, Jr., Appellee.

No. 73-904.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 4, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15553 and #15554; NEW JERSEY Disaster Number NJ-00048]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-4368-DR), dated 06/08/2018.

*Incident:*                         Severe Winter Storm and Snowstorm.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/06/2018 through 03/07/2018.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 07/13/2018.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/07/2018.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/08/2019.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of NEW JERSEY, dated 06/08/2018, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Burlington                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2018-15588 Filed 7-19-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### John Peacher, Adm’r &c., Plaintiff in Error, *vs.*Sallie Patrick, *et al.,*Defendants in Error.

1. *Bill of exceptions*— Motion *in arrest, not reviewed without.*— In the absence of any bill of exceptions, the Supreme Court will not review the action of the trial court on motion in arrest. Such motion being no part of the record proper, can only be brought up by bill of exceptions.

*Error to Boone Oircuit Court.*

*Prewitt' S¡- Jones,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*O. Guitar,*for Defendants in Error.

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action under the mechanic’s lien law, for lumber provided for a house. There was a finding and judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

A motion in arrest of judgment was filed by the defendants and the judgment was arrested, and a final judgment rendered in favor of the defendants.

The record contains no bill of exceptions. And the clerk in his return to a writ of *certiorari,*certifies that no bill of exceptions was filed.

*We*are asked to review the judgment of the court on the motion in arrest.

As there was no bill of exceptions saving the points presented by counsel in their briefs, we have no authority to pass on them.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

The other Judges concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      10,701,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,306,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (468,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,570,000
<PP&E>                                     974,355,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (23,924,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,072,258,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,459,000
<BONDS>                                    393,281,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 618,460,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,072,258,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,921,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,532,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,480,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,716,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                22,716,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
        

</TABLE>
Conclusion

With the submission of Isaac Huger’s returns for South Carolina on

February 5, 1792, the sixteen U.S. marshals, Governor Blount, and their 

approximately 650 deputies completed the first census of the nation’s 

population—counting 3,929,214 people.229 230 When President 

Washington and Secretary of State Jefferson received the final census 

results they were disappointed in the final count.231 According to 

President Washington, he believed that the 1790 returns were so low 

because some people failed to complete the census for religious 

reasons, fears of being taxed, a general mistrust of the federal 

government, or because lazy deputies failed to count entire 

households.

232

 President Washington’s reasoning reveals some of the 

challenges that the marshals and their deputies experienced during the 

enumeration—some of which enumerators still experience today. 

Since 1790, the U.S. Census Bureau has evolved into a complex federal 

agency that collects, analyzes, and interprets a vast amount of data 

related to the United States and its territories and island areas. While 

the scope of the Census Bureau’s mission has grown in scale, its primary 

objective, as specified in the U.S. Constitution, remains the foundational bedrock upon which 

the organization was built. Today, the United States has a population 327,167,434 people and 

encompasses a landmass of 3,531,905 sq. miles. The Census Bureau remains committed to 

expanding upon the legacy of public service that the first class of the U.S. Marshal Service

established in 1789-1790.

233

 

 

229 W.S. Rossiter, “The First Census of the United States,”pg. 46.

230 "The First Census," in Heads of Families/1790/A Century of Population Growth Maine, New Hampshire, & 

Vermont, 1:4.

231 “1790 Overview,” United States Census Bureau, last estimated release October 21, 2019, 

https://www.census.gov/history/www/through_the_decades/overview/1790.html. (Accessed October 21, 20190. 

232“From George Washington to Gouvernur Morris., 28, July 1791,” Online Library of Liberty, last estimated release 

2004, https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/washington-the-writings-of-george-washington-vol-xii-1790-

1794?q=census#Washington_1450-12_53. (Accessed November 15, 2019). [Original source: The Writings of 

George Washington, vol. 12, 1790-1794, ed. Editor: Worthington Chauncey Ford (New York and London: G. P. 

Putnam’s Sons, 1890, pp.NA]

233 “QuickFacts: United States,” United States Census Bureau, last estimated release October 31, 2019, 

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045218. (Accessed October 31, 2019). 

For the first five census in American 

history, the Secretary of State was 

responsible for ensuring the marshals

completed their census returns. Thomas 

Jefferson, the first Secretary of State, 

presided over the 1790

Courtesy of Independence National 

Historical Park
### CMP-1

Revised: May 3, 2004 

## San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Supplemental Application Form



# Conservation Management Practices: ALFALFA

Farm Name: CMP Plan Years: to

Maximum Crop Acreage:

Fallow Acreage Last Planted in Alfalfa:

Land Preparation/

Cultivation Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the maximum crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.
Chemigation/Fertigation, ac Night Farming, ac Combined Operations, ac Non-Tillage/Chemical Tillage, ac Conservation Irrigation, ac Precision Farming (GPS), ac Equipment Change/Tech. Improvements, ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category
Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above:



### Harvest Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the maximum crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.
Baling/Large Balers, ac Night Harvesting, ac Green Chop, ac Shuttle System, ac Equipment Change/Tech. Improvements Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category, ac Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above:



### Other Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the maximum crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.
Application Efficiencies, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category

Bulk Materials Control No Burning, ac Cover Crop, ac Surface Roughening, ac Irrigation Power Units Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: CMP

1
HUNTSMAN 

Enriching lives through innovation 

HUNTSMAN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CENTER 

TESTING SERVICES- ANALYTICAL 

SUBMITTED BY: SALAZLC REPORTDATE: 10/20/2011 

REPORTED BY: W. Yan REPORT GROUP: 11-0784 

SampleiD Notebook Material Description 

BA53340 8957-66-A XOF-25S [Acid Form] 

BA53341 8957-66-B XOF-25SNA [Neutralized Form] 

TECHNIQUE: LC-MS 

CONDITIONS: ESI(-)-Q-Tof, methanol mobile phase; Flow rate 0.2 mllmin; data collected by flow injection, 

sample was dissolved in methanol (BA53340) or methanol:Water=5:1 (for BA53341), 200 !tg/ml; injection 

volume 1 11!. 

RESULTS: 

Page I of2 
ATTACHMENT TWELVE: PMN SUBSTANCE ONE AND PMN SUBSTANCE TWO LCMS 

CONFIDENTIAL