alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jemima Shaw, Plaintiff in Error, *vs.*John J. Dinwiddie, Defendant in Error.

1. *Practice, civil*— >Supreme *Court*— Final *judgment.*— A writ of error will be dis. missed when, there was no final judgment in the court below.

*Error to Morgan Circuit Court.*

*A. W.*Anthony, for Plaintiff in Error.

*Draffin,*for Defendant in Error.

Sherwood Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no final judgment in this cause, and for that.reason the writ of error willbe dismissed.

Judge Adams absent. The other judges concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROMERO ORTIZ
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3508

[ June 21, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; William W. Haury, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 09

- 16915

CF10A and 09

- 19435 CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, C IKLIN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000948218
<NAME> MINN DAK FARMERS COOP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                             507
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     62,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,806
<PP&E>                                         163,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                (54,686)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,692
<BONDS>                                         12,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,483
<COMMON>                                           121
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,842
<SALES>                                        141,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,023
<CGS>                                           50,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,087
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,087
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS





<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           11765947
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     20438
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 11786385
<CASH>                                         714539
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             26677
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         433695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14147853
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                2661176
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            60009
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 3952060
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          183728
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       466239
<OTHER-SE>                                     5946721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14147853
<PREMIUMS>                                     11532718
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            859749
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             75754
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 0
<BENEFITS>                                     8591059
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    40972
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           1591094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (931612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (931612)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 816500
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             7022881
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               823846
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                1368630
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (12507)





</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**Certification**

I, Bennie H. Duck,certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc.

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The Company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and based on such evaluation:

a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport (based on such evaluation); and

c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)  Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  Sept 13, 2007
|        | By: /s/ BENNIE  H. DUCK  |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Bennie H. Duck           |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
-  HIPAA for Professionals 
-  Regulatory Initiatives 
-  Privacy      -  Summary of the Privacy Rule 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Combined Text of All Rules 
  -  HIPAA Related Links 
-  Security      -  Summary of the Security Rule 
  -  Security Guidance  
  -  Cyber Security Guidance 
-  Breach Notification      -  Breach Reporting 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  Regulation History 
-  Compliance & Enforcement      -  Enforcement Rule 
  -  Enforcement Process 
  -  Enforcement Data 
  -  Resolution Agreements 
  -  Case Examples 
  -  Audit 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  State Attorneys General 
-  Special Topics      -  HIPAA and Part 2 
  -  Change Healthcare Cybersecurity Incident FAQs 
  -  HIPAA and COVID-19 
  -  HIPAA and Reproductive Health        -  HIPAA and Final Rule Notice 
  -  HIPAA and Telehealth 
  -  HIPAA and FERPA 
  -  Research 
  -  Public Health 
  -  Emergency Response 
  -  Health Information Technology 
  -  Health Apps 
-  Patient Safety      -  Statute & Rule        -  PSQIA Statute 
    -  Patient Safety Rule 
  -  Enforcement 
  -  Guidance 
-  Covered Entities & Business Associates      -  Business Associate Contracts 
  -  Business Associates 
-  Training & Resources 
-  FAQs for Professionals 
-  Other Administrative Simplification Rules 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# Danbury Psychiatric Consultants (DPC)

Danbury Psychiatric Consultants (DPC), located in Massachusetts, failed to respond timely to a complainant’s access request.  DPC also withheld the complainant’s access on the basis that the complainant had an outstanding balance and required a signed request or authorization request. DPC has agreed to take corrective actions and has paid $3500 to settle a potential violation of the HIPAA Privacy Rule's right of access standard.
                          - Read the HHS Press Release
                          - Read the Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan

Content last reviewed July 15, 2022
A FS

- 13

- 064

- E December 03, 2012

Mr. Walter T. Miller

2998 East Fallentine Road Sandy, UT 84093

Dear Mr. Miller :

This letter is in response to your correspondence sent to the public docket dated November 8,

2012 (public docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0168 ) petitioning the Fe deral Aviation Administration

for an extension to Exemption No. 10249 . That exemption from 14 Code of Federal Regulations ( CFR ) § 91.109(a) and (b)(3) allowed you to conduct certain flight instruction in Baron, Beechcraft Bonanza, Debonair, and Travel Ai r aircraft equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel instead of functioning dual controls

.

On Aug ust 31, 2011 , the FAA amended 14 CFR p art 91 related to throwover control wheels ( 76 FR 54095 ) . A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your inf ormation.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airm e n and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1914

HA SIM, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-485-847) Submitted: January 26, 2007 Decided: February 16, 2007 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ha Sim, Petitioner Pro Se. James Arthur Hunolt, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Tracey Wood, Mona Maria Yousif, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ha Sim, a native and citizen of Burma, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find that substantial evidence supports the ruling that Sim failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution, as necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2006) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). Moreover, as Sim cannot sustain his burden on the asylum claim, he cannot establish his entitlement to withholding of removal. SeeCamara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004) (“Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).”). Although Sim did not present an argument concerning the denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture to the Board, the Board found that the record provided no basis for finding that Sim demonstrated eligibility for protection under the Convention. Even assuming we have jurisdiction to consider this- 3 - claim, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2000); Gandziami-Mickhou v. Gonzales , 445 F.3d 351, 359 n.2 (4th Cir. 2006) (citing Asika v. Ashcroft , 362 F.3d 264, 267 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004)), we agree with the Board as to its merits. We deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### ~**~**
VAC. PUMP

## ~ l

### ~ HEATEXCH. 

# ., CHILLER SYSTEM

# ~ REACTOR CONDENSER**~** THERMAL 

# ...__ VACUUM 

# ..._ OXIDIZER PUMP

# ~ 

# ... S"'
NITROGEN SYSTEM POWDER

### ~ COOLING DELIVERY TOWER SYSTEM 

# I 

# ., ., .4


# ., ., 1500-1

# n~ l 

# ., TANK SOLVENT TANK EDA 

# ., CONDENSATE (FUTURE) TANK

RECEIVER (FUTURE) THERMAL REACTOR2 

# ... OIL BOILER WIHEAT



# ...... EXCHANGER 

# l
FILTER&

# ~~ 

# ,. RAW MATERIALS PACKAGE 

## ........... IN DRUMS

PALMER INTERNATIONAL, INC. PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM SCALE: NONE SKIPPACK, PA REACTOR2 DATE: 4-11-2012
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 36659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16205]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 03/03-0263]

Argosy Investment Partners V, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption 
Under the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Argosy Investment Partners V, L.P., 950 
West Valley Road, Suite 2900, Wayne, PA 19087, a Federal Licensee under 
the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Argosy 
Investment Partners V, L.P. is seeking post-financing approval from SBA 
for loan and equity financings it made to POSC Holdings LLC, formerly 
known as Panhandle Oilfield Service Companies, Inc., 14000 Quail 
Springs Parkway, Suite 300, Oklahoma City, OK 73134.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P., an 
Associate of Argosy Investment Partners V, L.P., owns more than ten 
percent of POSC Holdings LLC, and therefore this transaction is 
considered Financing an Associate requiring prior SBA approval. Argosy 
Investment Partners V, L.P. has already made its investments in POSC 
Holdings LLC and is seeking post-financing SBA approval.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on this transaction within fifteen days of the date of 
this publication to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment 
and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20416.

A. Joseph Shepard,
Associate Administrator for Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2018-16205 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Birner Dental Management
      Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
      to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
      knowledge:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






Date:
      August 14,
      2007





By: /s/
      Frederic W.J. Birner


Name:  Frederic
      W.J. Birner


Title: Chief
      Executive Officer





By: /s/
      Dennis N. Genty


Name:
      Dennis N. Genty


Title:  Chief
      Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**Certification**

I, Bennie H. Duck,certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-Q of First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc.

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The Company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and based on such evaluation:

a)        Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)       Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport (based on such evaluation); and

c)        Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)        Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)       Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: Sept 11, 2006 |                     |
|---------------------|--------------------------|
|                | By: /s/ BENNIE H.  DUCK  |   |
|                | Bennie H. Duck           |
|                | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
#### Jose Manuel GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-43.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 11, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: September 17, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Angela Hackel, Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards, Office of Air and 

Radiation

SUBJECT: September 17, 2004, meeting with WE ACT for Environmental Justice, regarding 

Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on September 17, 2014 to 

discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants.

ATTENDEES

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Laura McKelvey, OAR

Ted Palma, OAR

Angela Hackel, OAR

Amanda Curry Brown, OAR

Arthur Zuco, OAR

Mikhail Adamantiades, OAR

Regina Chappell, OAR

Chebryll Edwards, OAR

Marguerite McLamb, OAR

Phil Lorang, OAR

Neal Fann, OAR 

Marva King, OEJ

Outside Organizations 

Mr. Brent Newell, Center for Race, Poverty & Environment

Rev. Leo Woodberry, Kingdom Living Temple

Dr. Nicky Sheats, New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance/Thomas Edison State College

Dr. Cecilia Martinez, Center for Earth, Energy and Democracy

Dr. Erica Holloman, Southeast CARE Coalition

Ms. Sharon Lewis, Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice

Mr. Cecil Corbin-Mark, WE ACT for Environmental Justice

Dr. Jalonne L. White-Newsome, WE ACT for Environmental Justice