alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WMA CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        16,347,786
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     736,515
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              17,084,301
<CASH>                                       1,165,377
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              78,428
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      13,398,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,832,361
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,929,709
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,965,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,832,361
<PREMIUMS>                                   3,530,262
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            512,218
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 889,991
<BENEFITS>                                   1,836,419
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    628,015
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,008,599
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,095,845
<INCOME-TAX>                                   373,650
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            722,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   722,195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
3

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERC§—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS [D1—578)

county... ah Yo FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1920—POPULATION ENuwerarion District No..eS¢7 J JP :

Pr _A
TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF COUNTY... seal eo ree tele are We ne NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE DAE ot [ord W 7; Y
iar propa ws a, al, aan lin, Vows, tas, Hv, ALAR, ade, Wak, oe Ra Vara RPP (tase sibs cian of cms on Cy, Wags row banaaiic eakatrctieasy «= SYARD OF CITY —....2, penises *
NAUEV OE IRSTITIINION Ue eee en ee ie ee ENUMERATED BY ME ON HE ~ iy KR DAY OF Lo ? d gf |

[Vnsert name of iascitutlon, ifiny, und indicate tiie Ides oa Wilcli tiie entriee are made. See instructions.)

SHEET NO.

PLACE OF ABODE. NAME RELATION. TEMURE. | PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. | CITIZENSHIP. | EDUCATION. NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE. OCCUPATION.

of cach person enumerated. If born inthe United States, Ive the atate orterritory. If of foreign birth ve the place of birth

> | mumber Kom.
: Relationship of this
or form, Pater sarname fret, then the gtven name and middle sean ts the tend ax

bed J Inifial, Uf any. e family.

lastrace Hatlon| Tuciede every person living on daneary 4, 1920, Orit
: A ;

}
]

lem

— - Trade, profession, or partie- | Todect . bal estab. | *
FATHED. HOTHER, alos kind of werk doar, es Hakment ta whieh at weeks ware
laters | &s cofton mill, dry goods <
store, farm, etc.

Street, arenge, |
ie" | read, etc

earof natural.

Uaioe.
Attended school |

Howe owned ar
reated.
wiiowed, ordl-

vorced.

Lear of Immicra-
than fotdelalt-
any tle since

If nataralized,

mertgased.

rou born slnce Janunry 1, 1920. Mother tongue.

Naoturallzed or

Age at Last birth
day.

' Single, married,

Whether able to

|

& If owned, free or

to S | Color or race.
-_
we

© |.
BY a -

Rona

kK
42 j

a =
*

;

i
a
¢

~

Ce Fee

coe xn aocgnkr & Ww =

——s
=)

—
—_

nm

—
i

=
—

~
a

—
a

os
~I

to bt

_  Rartacen dh on

to

i fy
A £ { defi

Rassias
i>

| fered |

Ra sdece.

fe |
Te SE (EEA sees. 3/4 °F 9) Me

|
j
1;
|

Aceh. ie ee

storic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,

not the U.S. Census Bureau.

- Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly

Dodabin, available records like the one shown here. a
Lene! % Wy a02 Lede De Ow

c :
rm maaate~ Seu

Rass | tA

feet ow é

re

7e ~ af | . o” 7 —
. x =" [ 2 = —— =4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from McCombs
Realty Partners, Ltd. 1997 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759198
<NAME> MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,250)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          5,727
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,362)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,547
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,506
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        11
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors.

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.'s
33-77820, 33-77814, 33-69846, 33-69848, 33-66540, 33-66542, 33-63723, 333-02617,
333-38017, 333-50831, 333-90233, 333-90255 and 333-41812 of Bush Industries,
Inc. on Form S-8 and 333-14819 and 333-09291 of Bush Industries, Inc. on
Form S-3 of our report dated February 3, 2003 (February 28, 2003 as to Note 14)
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph regarding a change in accounting for goodwill), appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bush Industries, Inc. for the year ended
December 28, 2002.

Deloitte & Touche, LLP

Buffalo, New York
March 26, 2003
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert HARRISON v. Matthew S. BRANIFF, Judge, Criminal District Court.

No. 60974.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Robert Harrison, applying for writ of mandamus and prohibition. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
Record ofDiscussion Docket No. FAA- 

### )ot'l;-t:?I3D Directorate Identifier:

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED Hartzell Propeller Dick Edinger Several Concur. AOPA Rob Hackman

Other /Additional Information: Name TCDS Model Number PartNumber Hartzell Propeller Inc P-845 HC-12X HC-12X20-7 _.,- Hartzell Propeller Inc P46GL HC-12V HC-12V20-7../ Hartzell Propeller Inc P-845 HC-12X HC-12X20-8/ Hatizell Propeller Inc P46GL HC-12V HC-12V20-8 / TRW Hartzell Propeller P-917 HC-D2X HC-D2X20-7 _, Hartzell Propeller Inc P48GL HC-D2V HC-D2V20-7 / Hartzell Propeller Inc P48GL HC-D2MV HC-D2MV20-7/ TRW Hartzell PropellerP-917 HC-D2X HC-D2X20-8/ Hartzell Propeller Inc P48GL HC-D2V HC-D2V20-8 v Hartzell Propeller Inc P48GL HC-D2MV HC-D2MV20-8 -' Hartzell Propeller Inc P-888 HC-13X HC-13X20-8 ./ Hartzell Propeller Inc P51GL HC-D3V HC-D3V20-8 ./ Hartzell Propeller Inc P51GL HC-D3MV HC-D3MV20-8/

9
#### Paul Vincent SAVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-395.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 2, 1972.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; W. Rogers Turner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
## Exhibit H Pinnacl X Fixed Wing Aircraft Flight Restrictions

Fixed Wing Aircraft Flight Restrictions

The FWChameleon and the Ultra Stick 120 and 25e aircraft are experimental unmanned aircraft

system s , UAS, and ha ve the following flight restrictions.

 Cannot be flown over assembles of people, such as concerts, weddings, sporting events and

similar events.

 All personnel in the area must be notified that the aircraft will be flown.

 Cannot be flown over active road ways with operating traffic below.

 Cannot be flown over active waterways with heavy vessel traffic b elow unless approved by the

vessel operators.

 If the aircraft is flown around structures such as building power lines, power line structures,

stacks, bridges

, cell towers, radio tower

, permission is required from the owner / operator.

Additionally t he flight operation must be in compliance any local, state or federal laws

.

 The FWChameleon aircraft is qualified to fly a safe operating distance from energized power

lines with the proper permissions from the utility company owning and operating the line.

 Cannot be flown in any other airspace unless approved by the FAA and airspace controlling

authority.
October 20, 2015

Federal Aviation Administration U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Len Davis Telephone: (630) 406

- 7990 x202 Mobile: (630) 301

- 0090

Email: ldavis@purei.com Website: www.purei.com Company: Pure Imagination, Inc Address: 12 E Wilson St., Batavia, IL 60510

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 2925

Re: Additional information to comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (d) in order to process our petition for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

Dear Sir or Madam:

Granting the petitioner an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) would have a positive impact on the public as a whole in the following ways:

1. Granting an exemption would allow the public to be able to legally acquire aerial ph otography and videography to assist in educational, corporate, sales, promotional, training and instructional purposes safely, efficiently, and economically.

2. The petitioner would be able to provide live video feed to assist with search and

rescue oper ations in cases of an emergency or natural disaster only when the local authorities or government has requested it by contract or donation.

3. The petitioner would be able to train persons individually or belonging to both private and/or public organizat ions to increase awareness and improve safety for current and future UAS operations within the NAS.

4. Providing this service at a lower cost and ensuring operational and legal safety to the individuals of the United States has a positive impact. Using s mall UAS, we will pose no threat to the public given its small size and lack of combustible fuel when compared to larger manned aircraft. Our UAS will minimize ecological damage and promote economic growth by providing a service to to our clients.

5. Lik ewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations.6. Aerial video/photography with the small UAS will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations.

Respectfully submitted,

Len Davis
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7513
MICHAEL A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusUNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; JANE YOUNG, Doc tor; SHAW UNIVERSITY; NAOMI ONUORA; TALBERT SHAW, Doctor, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-97-566-5-BR-2) Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 7, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the districtcourt's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. United States , No. CA97-566-5-BR-2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties VII Limited Partnership 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000758009
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES VII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          20,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,134)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,084
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,687
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 917
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       220
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.56<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### William J. DENTON v. STATE of Florida, Constable, County of Volusia, County Court, State’s Attorney, et al.

No. 38487.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Mandamus denied without'opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15963]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Registration

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Registrants listed below have applied for and been granted 
registration by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as bulk 
manufacturers of various classes of schedule I and II controlled 
substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The companies listed below applied to be 
registered as bulk manufacturers of various basic classes of controlled 
substances. Information on previously published notices are listed in 
the table below. No comments or objections were submitted for these 
notices.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Company                             FR docket                           Published
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc..........  83 FR 5275                      February 6, 2018.
Cayman Chemical Company.................  83 FR 17678                     April 23, 2018.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of these registrants to manufacture 
the applicable basic classes of controlled substances is consistent 
with the public interest and with United States obligations under 
international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 
1971. The DEA investigated each of the company's maintenance of 
effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing each 
company's physical security systems, verifying each company's 
compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing each company's 
background and history.
    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 
CFR 1301.33, the DEA has granted a registration as a bulk manufacturer 
to the above listed companies.

    Dated: July 19, 2018.
John J. Martin,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-15963 Filed 7-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 99.9

CONSENT OF EXPERT

I, Robert Krcmarov,
hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the references to scientific and technical information relating to mineral properties of Barrick Gold Corporation (the Company) in the Annual Information Form for the year ended
December 31, 2016 (the AIF) and the related Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company.

I do also
hereby consent to the use of my name and the incorporation by reference of the information contained in the AIF and Annual Report on Form 40-F into the Registration Statements of the Company on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-121500, 333-131715, 333-135769), Form
F-3 (File No. 333-206417) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-216099).

Yours very truly,



|                    |  |                                                 
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert Krcmarov
|Name:               |  | Robert Krcmarov                                 
|Title:              |  | Executive Vice President, Exploration and Growth
|Dated:              |  | March 24, 2017
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7079

REGINALD FULLARD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LETITIA OWEN; JAMES W. MCRAE; SGT. OXENDINE; CPT. ROUSH , Defendants

- Appellees , and ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of NCDPS , Defendant

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. ( 5:15

- ct

- 03147

- BO )

Submitted : January 22, 2019 Decided: January 28, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE , Circuit Judge s, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Reginald U. Fullard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Reginald U. Fullard appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fullard v. Owen , No. 5:15

- ct

- 03147

- BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2018) . We deny Fullard’s mot ion to bar affirmative defenses and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED