alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE
                                INFINITY GROUP

                               January 22, 1997

VIA FAX

Steeplechase Partners Limited Partnership
c/o The Balcor Company
2355 Waukegan Road
Suite A-200
Bannockburn, Illinois  60015
Attention:  Ilona Adams

                         RE:  STEEPLECHASE APARTMENTS
                              LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is hereby made to that Agreement of Sale (the "Agreement"), dated
November 20, 1996, which was reinstated and amended by a Reinstatement Of, And
First Amendment To, Agreement of Sale, dated December 20, 1996 (the "First
Amendment"), between Steeplechase Partners Limited Partnership, as Seller, and
Infinity Acquisitions, L.L.C., as Purchaser, for the purchase and sale of the
above property.

Pursuant to Paragraph 4 of the First Amendment, please be advised that we are
extending the Closing Date to March 17, 1997.  With a copy of this letter, we
are sending to the Escrow Agent a check for $100,000 as additional earnest
money under the Agreement.


                         Very truly yours,

                         INFINITY ACQUISITION, L.L.C.

                         BY:   /s/ Steven A. Stender
                              --------------------------------

CC:  The Balcor Company, attn:  Mr. James Mendelson; Lawyers Title Insurance
Corporation, attn:  Kathleen S. Campbell; Phillip Schechter; Rick Scarola;
Katten, Muchin & Zavis, attn:  Daniel J. Perlman, Esq. and Steven Ginsberg,
Esq. (all via fax) Charter Title Company, attn:  Lea Fendley (with enclosure,
via overnight mail)
<PAGE>
CENSUS YEAH. Population. 

L""C!tE \SC 0\'Elt l'U.ECI~I1INH 

(E!iSUS. 

Number. J!er cenL. 

! 1erc.unt of increase 

for the 

U111te,1 

Ftatcs. 

--------------------1------11 ~--~~. ~~~-- ~.1-- ""--~:-~-

1920..... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ~~2· 8?~ 

llllO........................................ il11,0•1h I 2i>7,!Jl0 H0.8 21.0 

i~~~:: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : I ~!~i:: l,:~'.; Ii· ... ~ :~·- ~ t::'. ...... l'.'." ~ .. : .... ~~·. '. .. 

Counties.-North Dakota has 53 counties, 4 of 

which (Golden Valley, Grant, Sioux, and Slope) havo 

hccn organizetl from parts of 2 others (Billings imd 

Morton) since 1010. Of the remaining '17 counties 

whose boundaries have remained unchtmge<l, 30 show 

increases and 11 decreases as compared with 1910. 

(See Table 1.) Because of the changes in area duo to 

the organization of the new counties it has been necessary, in preparing the maps on page 3, showing rntcs 

,of increase or decrease in total and rural population, 

to combine Grant, Morton, and Sioux Counties and 

to combine Billings, Golden Valley, and Slope Counties. 

26588-21-1 

Density of popnlation.-'l'he total lan<l an•a of t.]J(I 

state is iO, 183 square miles. The 11vernge numht'l' 

Of i11Jmbit:mts to the square UliJ(\ in lf!20 is 9.2 (S<\C 

TalJle 1), t1S against 8.2 in 1910 and '1.5 in moo. 

Minor civil divisions.--The political units into whieh 

the connti(•s are divided are collectively temw(l "miuor 

c.i\ril divisions." The counties of North Dnkotr1 are 

mu1k up of 2,119 primary divisions, comprising 1,268 

civil iownsl1ips, 297 unorganized townships (ineluding 

5 for which no population was reported in 1920), 212 

sehool to\v11Ships, 32 sehool districts, 18 olcctim1 preciucts, 92 cit.ies, 198 villages, and 2 towns. 'l'lw only
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. William ROBERTS, Relator, v. The Honorable M. Ignatius LESTER, Judge of the Circuit Court in and for Monroe County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-196.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1413 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1413

    To exempt from sequestration certain fees of the Food and Drug 
                            Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2013

  Mr. Pryor (for himself, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Franken, Mr. Moran, and Mr. 
Coats) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                     to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To exempt from sequestration certain fees of the Food and Drug 
                            Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FDA User Fee Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FROM SEQUESTRATION CERTAIN USER FEES OF FOOD AND DRUG 
              ADMINISTRATION.

    The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is 
amended--
            (1) in section 255(g)(1)(A) (2 U.S.C. 905(g)(1)(A))--
                    (A) by inserting after ``Financial Agent Services'' 
                the following new item:
                    ``Food and Drug Administration, Salaries and 
                Expenses, but only the portion of appropriations under 
                such account corresponding to fees collected under the 
                Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and section 
                354(r)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (75-9911-0-
                1-554).''; and
                    (B) by inserting after ``Reimbursement to Federal 
                Reserve Banks'' the following new item:
                    ``Revolving Fund for Certification and Other 
                Services (75-4309-0-3-554).;''; and
            (2) in section 256(h)(4) (2 U.S.C. 906(h)(4)), by adding at 
        the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(G) The portion of administrative expenses 
                incurred by the Food and Drug Administration that are 
                funded through fees collected under the Federal Food, 
                Drug, and Cosmetic Act and section 354(r)(1) of the 
                Public Health Service Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Carlos L. SOTOLONGO, Petitioner, v. The COUNTY OF DADE, State of Florida and the Honorable Harold G. Featherstone, as Judge of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, Respondents.

No. 43816.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 24, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 275 So.2d 628.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Russell TALLENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-751.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 2, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; M. Daniel Futch, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           57689
<SECURITIES>                                     49130
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6130
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                121947
<PP&E>                                            7606
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3108)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  150126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            47622
<BONDS>                                            136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                      102270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    150126
<SALES>                                           4980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4980
<CGS>                                             8349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1822)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (639)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1182)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
#### Julia S. GRIMSLEY, Petitioner, v. The FLORENCE CRITTENDEN HOME et al., Respondents.

No. 36526.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1967.

Robinson & Randle, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Mathews, Osborne & Ehrlich, Jacksonville, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there *167has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorneys’ fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ„ concur.
#### Dorothy G. McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Percy A. CHAMPAGNE, Jr., and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 6268.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1978.

Domengeaux & Wright by Terry E. Ther-iot, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant Percy A. Champagne.

McBride & Brewster by Norman P. For-et, Lafayette, for intervenor State Farm Mutual.

Bean & Rush by Ernest L. Parker, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee Dorothy G. McDonald.

Allen, Gooch & Bourgeois, Ltd. by Randal K. Theunissen, Lafayette, for defendant-ap-pellee Fireman’s Ins.

Before GUIDRY, FORET and JOHNSON, JJ.

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of *Percy A. Champagne, Jr. v. Dorothy G. McDonald, and Fireman’s Insurance Company,*355 So.2d 1335 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1978), we conclude that the accident giving rise to this litigation was caused solely and proximately by the negligence of Dorothy G. McDonald. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit. Costs both on the trial level and on appeal are to be borne by plaintiff.

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00743

- CV

John David HODGES, Appellant

v.

Isabel HODGES, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar C ounty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 18089 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Ap pellant

, proceeding pro se , s eeks to appeal t he trial court’s judgment granting a final

divorce in this cause

. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have been filed. The reporter’s record contains a trial transcript reflecting the trial court’s ruling granting the divorce and the

c lerk’s record contains judge’s notes denoting the terms of the divorce decree . However, the

clerk’s record does not contain a written final judgment signed by the trial court

. The deputy clerk of this court inquired with the trial court clerk and w as informed that no final judgment has been signed by the trial court judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this appeal is ABATED for a period of thirty (30) days to permit the trial court to e nter a written judgment granting a final divorce decree so that an appeal from the judgment may proceed. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 27.2 . Appellant’s pre maturely filed notice of appeal is effective and will be deemed filed “on the day of but after” the date the trial court’s signed final judgment. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 27.1(a).

The trial court clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk ’s record containing the

trial court ’s written judgment in this court withi n thirty (30) days from the date of this order.

If a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s written judgment is not filed within the prescribed time period, this appeal will be dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3. All other appellate deadl ines in this appeal are suspended pending further order of the court._________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez

, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of April, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRU Z

, Clerk of Court
living om the iat day of June, 1680." No others wit, Children BORN SINCE

mr

Received.Nov.23'80

\ as

sin the be Goa of —Z Acines.., State of buen u

ue [Inhabitants in

enumerated by me of the __day of Hane, 1880,

Dehee Dave

=o .

[eee

VBlawtaez.\ Hlargford Upirvenre.

| Lectlaced
Bawanine

Historie census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit httas//wnvw archives.gov for more information about pul

blicly available record

ke the one shown here.

a Fravann:

n te Meawcecee (daar
4 Viscrwee. Pigeceiean Meta

Lise. Mesreeries Mesraeed

1
|
Opsernat“Gudianre| hin =:

Clowns Ge | da deowe|
“Aacener. {ae Ariane

"ies ies Bin
uw arn,

is, La

[ Wrerene |B yA tmdeh Rteney teak
ch errs} Aef biioy tne

(Zizi | Pgeees Vaencdactd|
2

Al
ie pins
eee ee |

(Dawe etd Goad

Actual

iw pay aiga orey|

2 tee cee Dele ds

LSA
ee bag see j

Chea. G
Dela vas LET che ie

Weruent she lola

ap

i
bail

eeeea F

ae

aI IS

ry u

oF

?
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15991]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than August 10, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice 
President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. WNB Holding Company, Winona, Minnesota; to acquire 100 percent 
voting shares of First State Insurance Wabasha, Inc., Wabasha, 
Minnesota, and thereby indirectly engage in general insurance 
activities in a community that has a population not exceeding 5,000 
pursuant to section 225.28(b)(11)(iii)(A) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 23, 2018.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-15991 Filed 7-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AN AROR BUREAU OF THE CENSUS , o--thee

ir eC p5 /\ | i rere : | a a }
: : Cav — “hud |
ae \ SUPERVISOR'S DisTRICT No J i Sneet No

county Abo Food | THIRTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED\STATES:.J910 (Pi CULATION 44 “Vewumeration istic No, °O@., ys A
TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF COUNTY " = ee uct dee hin Nbecbe bas NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE ran etn emery nw ace ee. WARD OF CITY WA ¢ ia ic

wetae te fF hanes aod, alms, Cia i ll i spree buet, dieteiet, he dtelewed, Leh, ete. Mew beter thy } } sillace, few on
¢ a ¢

NAME OF INSTITUTION Santee ENUMLRATYZO BY ML ON THE DAY Of ities C i : apace Feed | Bede  ENUMERATOR

tid Crtbeete Chie Pithe cite wetebe da ELiee euebe be adr tieeeben, Beem bioetetis u

of
(both

Year of toomigra-

Mother of | Place of birth of cach person and parents of cach person coumerated. If born f the United States,
how many give the state or territory. If of foreign birth, give

children. aRe eORNET: fy BC) d

f

ofeach person whose place of abode on April 15,
110, was in this family.

ifan employer

or

Whether

LOCATION, | \ : RELATION, PERSONAL DESCRIPTION, NATIVITY, f CITIZENS. OCCUPATION. EDUCATION, OWNERSHIP OF OME

Whether able to speak an Wheth- Nom-

employer.der out ber of
employer, or weeks
werk oootof

on work

me slnee
d.

English; or, if not, Trade of profession of, or Genrral natare of Tadustes,
lve lanraage spoken, particular kind of work busine r establishment
: done ly this person, as jn which this person works,
apinner, salesman, las | as cotton mill, dry gauts

| afore, Jari, ele.

Relatlonsilp of this per-
son to the head of the
familly.

Enter sarname first, then the ghyen name aod middle

Name
Inktial, If any.

Nam- ber ‘lace “, . ‘Iaee
ber pow Vlace of birth of this Person Mace of birth of Father of Mace of birth of Mother of

r this person, this persou.
bora, tiv U j
| Ing.

day.

the Unton or Confed-
erate Army or Navy,

in order of vise)

itatloo.
tlon tothe Lalt-

derof visitation.
or dlvorced.
ed States.
fred or allen,
ed free

jug house do or

ortgarr

ach

Include every person Hvlow on April 15, 1910. Omit

on own April during
children born since April 15, 1U10.

arcounl. i. year
turd. | pte,

Street, avenue,
louse number lo
cltles or towns).
Number of family
Ace ot last birth.

Whether  bllad

Numberofyearsof
Whether a survivor

present marriage.

Whether single,
Whether able to
(woed or rented.
Varo of hotse.

Number of dwell
zs married, witewed,

(olor or race.

— Whether natural.

~
“
=

$ Sumber of farm

> fiwn

74. Oo ed sane od
tPadn

“ss Whether deaf and

a

CELIA “A yaa Th 2 0 |, Qo

Aral. i? F| Unve ue |
“Oke 6H 7 | twwlyy >” [-
ama mle |_|
l4~ Vi Ari
“ye! M F | oS <7 Fy ¢ If
LAL, TA x lar as| C|
Bruel j ts 37 pr Ol a ,
oa ed tr vl Pes Ini. 3g) i>

Cam us ZL? bis H
GOtL Cas | fz Ay 2x

o

\

4

o

any,
“of

ee

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.
#### Tom DICKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 23, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jordan Brown, Also Known as Jack Pitt, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 517]

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J.), rendered May 14, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a *341controlled substance in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant’s speedy trial motion was based entirely on CPL 30.30, a ground waived by defendant’s guilty plea, he failed to preserve his constitutional speedy trial claim *(People v Rowe,*244 AD2d 295, *lv denied*91 NY2d 930), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find, after balancing the factors set forth in *People v Taranovich*(37 NY2d 442), that defendant was not entitled to dismissal of the indictment. We note that the delay in executing the outstanding bench warrant was entirely attributable to defendant, since it was defendant who absconded in the first place, and because defendant impeded his apprehension by using aliases and providing conflicting pedigree information *(see, People v Sigismundi,*89 NY2d 587).

After affording defendant a reasonable opportunity to advance his claim of innocence, upon which defendant declined to elaborate, the sentencing court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to allow defendant to withdraw his knowing, intelligent and voluntary plea *(see, People v Ortiz,*221 AD2d 176). Defendant received effective assistance of counsel in connection with his plea withdrawal application *(id.).*Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Jacques-Miller Realty Partners, L.P. III Year-End 1995 10-KSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000757775
<NAME> JACQUES-MILLER REALTY PARTNERS LP III
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
257 La. 458

#### CHICAGO METALLIC CORPORATION v. J. PAUL SMITH AND COMPANY, Inc.

No. 51066.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 18, 1971.

In re: J. Paul Smith and Company, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 240 So.2d 918.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Raymond LONG, Appellee.

No. 70-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.