alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Syntellect Inc. and subsidiaries as of December
31, 1996 and the consolidated statements of operations of Syntellect Inc. and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,928
<SECURITIES>                                     1,275
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,233)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,235
<PP&E>                                          24,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,816)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,558
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,808
<SALES>                                         31,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,305
<CGS>                                           18,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   480
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,780)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>
hock: Birks |

\
. \
Tl bLke~~

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Deborah J. GRAVES, Appellee.

No. 72-977.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 7, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
**Rule 103. PROCEDURE FOR**  **AD OPTION,**  **FILING AN**  **D PUBLISHING RULES** 

*** (d) Rules of procedure adopted by other courts of the System. (1) For the purpose of this subdivision, the term ‘‘local rule’’ shall include every rule, administrative order, regulation, directive, policy, custom, usage, form or order of general application, however labeled or promulgated, which is adopted by a court of common pleas **[ the**  **Philadelphia Municipal**  **Court****** **Criminal Division,** **]**and the Philadelphia Municipal Court**[ -** **Traffic Division,]**  to govern practice and procedure. This subdivision shall also apply to any amendment of a local rule.

***
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D A N T E C A R L O S G A V I L A N O ; e t a l., P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70979 09- 70982 09- 70984 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 198- 936 A 095- 198- 938 A 095- 198- 939 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 20, 2011 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: R Y M E R , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n th e s e c o n s o lid a te dp e titio n s f o rr e v ie w , D an te C ar lo s G a v ilan o a n dh is f a m i l y , na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of P e ru, pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng the i rm ot i ons t o r e c ons i de ra nd 

# FI LED MA Y04 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70979 2 r e ope n. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of

am ot i on t o r e c ons i de ra nd r e ope n, Ca n o -Me r i da v . I NS , 3 1 1 F . 3 d9 6 0 , 9 6 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 2 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n s f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n s to r e c o n s id e r . T h e m o tio n s f a ile dto s p e c if

ya n ye rr o ro f

f a c t o rlaw w ith r e s p e c t to the B IA ’ s di sposi t i ve det erm i nat i on thatpet i t i on er s’ m ot i on s t o reopen w as u n tim e lya n dth a t th e yf a ile dto e s tab lis h th e yw e r e e n title dto e q u itab le to llin g . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; s e e a l s o I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 3 2 1 F .3 d8 8 9 , 8 9 7 ( 9 th C i r . 2003) ( e qui t abl e t ol l i ng a va i l abl e “ w he n ape t i t i one ri s pr e ve nt e d f r om f i l i ng be c aus e of

de c e pt i on, f

r aud, ore rr or , a s l ong a s the pe t i t i one ra c t s w i th due di l i gence”) . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n s to re op en w here pet i t i on er s f ai l ed t o d em on strat e thatthei r a dd i t i on alevi dence w as p r e v io u s lyu n a v a ilab le . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 1 ) ; B ha si n v. G on zales , 423 F . 3d 97 7, 98 4 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). PETI TI O N S FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1221 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1221

 To extend the existing suspension of duty on (6R,7R)-7-[(R)-2-Amino-2-
 phenylacetamido]-3-methyl-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-
                       carboxylic acid disolvate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 14 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

   Mr. Coats introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the existing suspension of duty on (6R,7R)-7-[(R)-2-Amino-2-
 phenylacetamido]-3-methyl-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-
                       carboxylic acid disolvate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON (6R,7R)-7-[(R)-
              2-AMINO-2-PHENYLACETAMIDO]-3-METHYL-8-OXO-5-THIA-1-
              AZABICYCLO[4.2.0]OCT-2-ENE-2-CARBOXYLIC ACID DISOLVATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.30.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and 
inserting ``12/31/96''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### WHITEHALL SOUTH ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Corporation not for profit, in its own behalf and on behalf of its members; and Joseph Castiello and Jean Castiello, his wife, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. RADICE REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Pennsylvania Corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 76-2610.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 7, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1978.

Stephen Lipton and Deborah Bovarnick of Becker, Poliakoff & Sachs, P. A., Miami Beach, for appellants.

M. A. Galbraith, Jr., and Cormac C. Cona-han, Boca Raton, for appellees City of Boca Raton and Frank Burther.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, J., and CRAWFORD, GRADY L., Associate Judge, concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

*1276ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially:

The trial court dismissed a suit brought by condominium apartment owners against the City of Boca Raton and its building inspector.1 The suit was for damages for alleged defects in the condominium structure and sought to impose liability on the city and its employee on the basis of alleged negligent inspections by the building inspector which failed to detect the defects claimed.

The trial court dismissed the action on the authority of *Modlin v. City of Miami Beach,*201 So.2d 70 (Fla.1967). I think the trial court was correct. In *Modlin*the Supreme Court held that a municipality was not liable for the negligence of its building inspector, because the building inspector himself owed no duty to any particular person (other than his employer, perhaps); but rather owed a duty to the public generally, the breach of which would not give rise to a private action in tort.

1

. This action predates the enactment of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes (1975) regarding the waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions.
# C_2022418EN.01005402.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/54

---

Order of the General Court of 26 July 2022 — WG v EUIPO

(Case T-567/21) (1)

(2022/C 418/70)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.

---
#### Louis A. GATHRIGHT v. Talmadge A. SMITH and Margie S. Lawrence.

No. 61289.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Talmadge A. Smith and Margie S. Lawrence, applying for certiorari or writ of *1334review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Morehouse.

Writ granted. It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### PAUL SMITH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and C. A. Fielland, Inc., Appellants, v. The CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-545.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 18, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### TROPIC-AIR DEVELOPMENT CO. v. Paul ROSEN.

No. 38668.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 222 So.2d 290.
#### Nolan SUMRALL et al. v. Ruben CASAS et al.

No. 9324.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

April 24, 1973.

Garic K. Barranger, Barranger, Bar-ranger, Jones, Covington, for appellants.

John J. Hainkel, Jr., Porteous, Toledano, Hainkel & Johnson, New Orleans, for ap-pellees.

Before LOTTINGER, ELLIS and CRAIN, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

This is a suit for personal injuries suffered by Frankie Brumfield Sumrall, and for special damages incurred by her husband, Nolan Sumrall, as a result of an in-tersectional collision between an automobile operated by Mrs. Sumrall and a tractor-trailer rig owned by C. H. Devaney and operated by Ruben Casa. Plaintiffs are Mr. and Mrs. Sumrall, and defendants are Mr. Casas, Mr. Devaney, and Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Company, their insurer. After trial on the merits, judgment was rendered in favor of defendants, dismissing the suit, and plaintiffs have appealed.

The accident happened at the intersection of Lee Road and Collins Boulevard, within the city limits of Covington, Louisiana, which intersection is controlled by a semaphore signal. Mrs. Sumrall was inbound on Lee Road, and brought her vehicle to a stop at the intersection in obedience to a red light. She testified that she looked to her left and saw Mr. Casas when he was about 400 feet away and again about 300 feet away, and did not thereafter see the truck until it hit her. She apparently kept her eye on the signal light, and, as soon as it turned green for her, drove into the intersection. The collision took place in the center of the intersection.

Mr. Casas was northbound on Collins Boulevard, approaching the intersection from Mrs. Sumrall’s left. When he first observed the signal light, it was green for traffic on Collins Boulevard, but turned amber when he was about 300 or 400 feet from the intersection, traveling at a speed of about 45 miles per hour. He immediately applied his brakes and began to sound his horn, but was unable to stop before entering the intersection and hitting Mrs. Sumrall’s vehicle. The rig left 300 feet of skid marks leading up to the point of the collision. By the time he arrived at the intersection, the light facing him had turned red.

The defense is that Mrs. Sumrall was contributorily negligent in driving into the intersection without looking to see if it was safe to do so, even though she had the green light. We agree with this contention.

*476In the case of Cavalier v. State Farm Insurance Company, 224 So.2d 22 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1969), we reviewed the jurisprudence and found that a motorist who has stopped for a red light cannot immediately start forward when the light turns to green without first ascertaining that there are no vehicles in the intersection, or in such proximity thereto as to be unable to stop before entering the intersection. By her own testimony, Mrs. Sumrall failed in her duty to do so, and was guilty of contributory negligence, which bars her from recovery.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed, at plaintiffs’ cost.

Affirmed.
New Hampshire: John Parker

Born on November 16, 1732, both John Parker’s law enforcement background and advanced 

age made him unique among his colleagues. For the majority of his career, Parker served as 

both the colonial sheriff and then state sheriff of Rockingham County, NH. Additionally, he

worked as a merchant and soldier at different points during the American Revolution. Perhaps 

it was because of his experience as a lawman and participation 

in the American Revolution that President Washington decided 

to appoint Parker as the U.S. marshal in New Hampshire in 

October 1789. Upon accepting the appointment, the 56-yearold Parker became the oldest marshal.

18

It is unclear if Parker had any deputies while he carried out his 

duty as a census enumerator.19 However, Parker submitted 

the 1790 Census returns for New Hampshire to Secretary of 

State Thomas Jefferson on August 10, 1791, a little more than 

a year after the census began on August 2, 1790.

20

 The final 

1790 returns show that New Hampshire had a population of 

141,885 people, thus making it the third most populous state 

in New England—a position it maintains today with a 

population of 1.356 million people.21 22 John Parker served his 

country to the end and passed away on October 4, 1791, just 

twenty days before Secretary of State Jefferson transmitted 

the initial returns to Congress.

 

18 “History - The First Generation of United States Marshals/The First Marshal of New Hampshire: John Parker,” 

U.S. marshals Service, last estimated release October 11, 2019, 

https://www.usmarshals.gov/history/firstmarshals/parker.htm. (Accessed October 11, 2019). 

19 "Summary of population, [of New Hampshire], by counties and towns: 1790," in Heads of Families/1790/A 

Century of Population Growth Maine, New Hampshire, & Vermont, 1:10.

 “Henry Dearborn,” National Park Service, last estimated release June 17, 2015, 

https://www.nps.gov/people/henry-dearborn.htm. (Accessed October 7, 2019).

20 “New Hampshire”. Return of the whole number of persons within the several districts of the United States: 

according to "An act providing for the enumeration of the inhabitants of the United States," passed March the first, 

one thousand seven hundred and ninety-one, pg. 19. PDF. Retrieved from

https://www.census.gov/content/census/en/library/publications/1793/dec/number-of-persons.html. (Accessed 

October 7, 2019).

21 “New Hampshire”. Return of the whole number of persons within the several districts of the United States: 

according to "An act providing for the enumeration of the inhabitants of the United States," passed March the first, 

one thousand seven hundred and ninety-one, pg. 19. 

22 “History - The First Generation of United States Marshals/The First Marshal of New Hampshire: John Parker”.

Article announcing John Parker’s 

appointment

Gazette of the United States (New York, 

NY), 30 September 1789
# .::i~!d&;Al!A...o<.·**-~-** FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE U TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF**COUNTY_-A-~-~~--~**
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
	

<ARTICLE> 5	
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<NAME> COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED


<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                   521,156
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                         18,549,626
<ALLOWANCES>                             198,476
<INVENTORY>                            3,745,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      22,745,620
<PP&E>                                22,740,103
<DEPRECIATION>                         7,683,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        46,132,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 10,581,834
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                              18,735,221
<OTHER-SE>                            15,950,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          46,132,129
<SALES>                               28,626,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      45,376,120
<CGS>                                  6,974,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         19,135,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      24,027,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         152,374
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        98,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        3,298,704
<INCOME-TAX>                           1,085,745
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    2,212,959
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           2,212,959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.43



</TABLE>
3 

4 

s 

IA bftJr 01 · ?! 

i 

... 

SUPPLEME TARY 

QUESTIO S 

•40 U:UTIO• 

--&M~:l.: ~ ........ •••1ll1 r, .l•lller, 

. _... ................ ........ 

- .. ..... 

PU.ca 01 IDft or 11.n:a ill> •ODD 

D~O• 

PDIO•il DUOATIO• 

~ 1 • I 

l 

'I 

.a 

1 ': 

••in. 

~ ........... la 

CW. lL .\ £ 'f lllllTSJ>.t..I I 

~ 

j 

1 

~ 0 

u 

I 

I 

: 

8 

PUCI or -.un 

........ ,,.... ...... IP" --. .... 

Jf ........ c:.: 

trJ _..._._,...,_ ia -~ 

l.197. 

.. 

.... _'6...._ ....... &111111..-. .......... llu 

Afril• ll/l.I .....__ ~ 

... - I ---------

,_ - Wll -------- har - 11 ._, ----- ..,.._ Till ---- 1111 ...,..._______ u ._.. ____ _ 

(11111 .......................... l. 

ca 

-

-

.I 

f I ! 

! .. 

.. • "' u 

0 I 

..: .... :et.•=..r......,...- ~ .............. ., ........ 5 • ..,_..... _.. ....-......wa ___ ... .._"...,_.,111._>:Jg. •to -·=C:e :=.=.ii.T"'r:s'C.:'~-. •. Jib: ... ...,.. .. ,.

DKPARTlaln' °' COlillllalC&-auu °'nm caaua a.o. No. _..h __ _ 

SIXTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1940 

POPULATION SCHEDULE 

' j9 

••Nam.uimi.u. 

-- la~--= f 1 

n•j oewm ....... ~ J · i jill ....... ) &-. .... ....... l. I 

.-. .. &e •• g A 

11 11 IO D II 17 19 ao 

---·i-----

..... .... 

·---

11 t1 i t 11 11 I ... '• w 1, I J • ·- t' 11 

CllL&F.~-U..at ........ .__Uft&leM ..._._. •• c:uaoirwoaa 

-· ~ ... ...,,...f:l,,...= ._ . ....., .... 

• ... ~-.: ...... ... • =~ .... .., c....,~ .... ....... • _ .... ... .. :&:~ ~ 

Its.:.;;:--· • --- ~ ... =·= ,, ~---- O& 

... ...... ----.. 

COJlll 

r 

2 

3 

36 

37
#### SAAB, USA, INC., Appellant, v. STRACHAN SHIPPING COMPANY, Appellee.

No. M-417.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 29, 1970.

Joseph P. Milton, of Kurz, Toole, Taylor, Moseley & Gabel, Jacksonville, for appellant.

*514Boyd, Jenerette, Leemis & Staas, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Stegemann v. Miami Beach Boat Slips, Inc., (5th Cir. 1954) 213 F.2d 561.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
DEPARTMENT OF GOMMERCE-SURERU OF fHe'c!
FOURTEENTH CENSUS\OF ‘THE UNITED STATES: 19:

Fue oF weonfosAe® UGE: ain BBC
nuraneo sv won we 2

PULATION::

a

(aa

SERPReRS Phe

ap] RR REB ES

3

aa

f
f
a

Cle

Historie census recor

ds. are maintained.

4202

Visit http://www archives.gov for more information about publicly available records i

and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not

ike the ones

hown here.

Mpaedas =|!

lek

eal

the U.S. Census Bureau,