alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LOCATION,

IN CITIES.

Mouse Number,

Street,

as Lcaiecolley ene =

County LLond 1

Township or other division of county. = hy A, LL ¢ te ti “ps

wore eeu eee

~ [Insert name ¢ of township, town, precinct, district, or other ci vil division, | ta tbe case may be. See instructions ]

Enumerated by me on the 27 # 2 3. :

NAME

of each person whose place of

7—224.

TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES.

SCHEDULE No. J.—POPULATION.

Vame of Institution, XK

RELATION.

Name of incorporated city, town, or village, within the above-named division, as ——— Sn Sea eonspeeetaaapaes esa

PERSONAL DESCRIPTION.

Supervisor's District No. ~

Enumeration District No. ~

NATIVITY. CITIZENSHIP.

Place of birth of seach and nts of each person enumvrated. If born in the United

person pare n
States, give the Biase or Terrstory; if of foreign birth, give the Country only.

y

oo i a a ee 8 ee ee eee

., Enumerator.

OCCUPATION, TRADE, OR
PROFESSION

=

co arvrieina@ua , &

oO 4

zo zw

wt
i

eo

w

a

cr

a

~2

‘oO

te 25 ze Po) 72 zw 2

a

V4

wg"

oS ww
—_- >

a] i=) Q
oo i) te

5 ese ww & &
Oo 2 A &

WU Leb-l¥5p 4
tL 192092. Yo. . Gb |

anal LSTOLE

df
lets sd
wl Ae L YW. ba bp GE

vps

as

BS S

a

LA wa

» -] = os = 5
° be Pe Fa 2 8s =
Z . - ’ abode on June 1, 1900, was eee , Es E F £ es = of eacli person TEN YEARS of are
a ee: in this family. 2 2 3] @ = sz |5 and over.
Zo =% Ss |eo| 248 F Es E
- Enter rname fi then the nam Relationship of each = —k a = xz 2 = PR
32 ; a3 7 middie tn itial, if Seah ¥ — person to the head $ as |a° Z s Es nS 3
Se) se of the family. £ 3/22] = Ss = Place of birth of Fatnex Place of birth of Morurn Ze |%z F
3 - . Month. Yer, | S | Se] & 7. & se of this person. of this person. = = — =
343 +4: INCLUDE every person Living o whey 3, 1900. ° = |42/) 218s ze c= | :s CCUPATION, =
? E Omrr chil ren born since June 1, 1900, & > |s=|ef2 =e -2 |B 2
gar | 35 = & |e | 5 [2 | = f= | 56 E
3 a | 8 |} 0 od 14 15 16 17 | o

Se ee ees

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,

not the U.S. Census Bureau.

fix \isit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
Elvan OW records like the one shown here.

Lieber lke

Mes wa \ Poe te fly

Os ehepol —
alg lahat

| GLa. eff,
eS Boney | —

- Lartnclly. test

eee

we eee tee ene ens|*

te wr ee www wn nh wm

Ward of city,

ee ee oe ee eee ewe eee

EDUCATION, OWNERSHIP OF HOME.

|

Numter of farm ecliedule.

employed,
es | Attended school (in

tnonthea),

= | Owned free of mortenard

a
cl
=

“

-
Z
=

E

—

5
s
-

2)

is | Can write.

Oe sate meee

ee ee

4
. > }
/ |
A=
4
7-- - ——
. |

'

(991) Han. LO ae, 7
95) 7

theraA a aehupl! epalablee, (0.

—~
i. 'S
~~
nN

a pad
oS ~*~

ao
©

z & PRA “Bl

| hays.

i pabsoes

“a

—"
jo
(>

co ant Gen eye lhUhOUlUMD

22 ~ — — ~ — oT —_
_ i) i) m2 ~= a a od
an
TM

30
Order issued October 5 , 2012 

In The 

(Court of Appeals 

.fiftI Bistrirt øf rxas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00438-CV 

MARY PAT MCDOWELL, ET AL., Appellants 

V. 

JEFF FRITTS, Appellee 

ORDER 

The Court has been notified that a petition for bankruptcy has been filed in United States 

Bankruptcy Court concerning appellant, Mary Pat McDowell. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, further 

action in this cause is automatically stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this cause is ABATED and will be treated as a 

closed case. It may be reinstated on prompt motion by any party showing that the stay has been lifted 

and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3.
#### Diamond HESTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, a municipal corporation, and the Travelers Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. N-531.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 2, 1971.

Henderson & Buchanan, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Hall, Hartwell, Michaels & Hall, Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on *748appeal having been read and given full consideration and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., RAWLS, J., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Willie HESTER and Minnie Lee Hester, Appellants, v. ATLANTIC LOAN COMPANY OF CONCORD, Appellee.

No. 72-774.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Sally Weintraub, Miami, for appellants.

Robert B. Fensholt, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After a review of the record on appeal we find that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by entering a final judgment based upon a default by the defendants. There has been no showing of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect by defendants as required by RCP 1.540 (b), 31 F.S.A. that would compel this court to set aside the final judgment.

Accordingly, the final .judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
- 19201
- 19202
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1346 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1346

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the alternative 
  tax liability limitation for small property and casualty insurance 
                               companies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2013

Mr. Harkin (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Rockefeller, 
and Mr. Blunt) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the alternative 
  tax liability limitation for small property and casualty insurance 
                               companies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION FOR ALTERNATIVE TAX LIABILITY FOR 
              SMALL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES.

    (a) In General.--Clause (i) of section 831(b)(2)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``$1,200,000'' and 
inserting ``$2,012,000''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Paragraph (2) of section 831(b) of such 
Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any 
                taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2013, 
                the dollar amount set forth in subparagraph (A)(i) 
                shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for such 
                        calendar year by substituting `calendar year 
                        2012' for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph 
                        (B) thereof.
                If the amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence 
                is not a multiple of $1,000, such amount shall be 
                rounded to the next lowest multiple of $1,000.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service**  **Plant Protection and Quarantine** 

## Administrative action **to revise**  **treatment schedule T101**  **- b**  **- 1**  **, the**  **methyl bromide fumigation of**  **asparagus for external**  **feeders Treat**  **ment Evaluation Document**  **Date** : December 6. 2012 **New Treatment/ Revision/Deletion**  **Treatment Type Target Pests**  **Commodity Applicable**  **Country(ies) of**

**origin** Revision Methyl Bromide

(MB) External Feeders Asparagus All **Objective :**  To provide justification for a revision of treatment schedule T101 -b - 1 in the PPQ Treatment Manual. The change, a half - an -hour increase in treatment duration for all temperature range s , is to help continue the importation of asparagus into the United States while safeguarding f rom target pests . **Overview:** In 2007, live Copitarsia sp. larvae were detected on Peruvian asparagus during a post- fumigation inspection. As prescribed by treatment T101 -b - 1 in the PPQ Treatment Manual (see below) , the asparagus had been fumigated using a 4 lbs MB /1000 ft3 dosage for two hours at 40 - 49° F. PPQ evaluated the treatment information and determined that while the treatment was efficacious against all stages of the pest , it s effectiveness against eggs was insufficient and a longer treatment d uration or a higher dose of MB would be needed for complete mortality of the eggs. A subsequent study by PPQ noted that fresh asparagus also had a tendenc y to absorb the chemical thereb y resulting in lower gas concentration s in the enclosure and a portion of eggs surviving the treatment (M yers , 2008 , pers. comm.) . Therefore , a s an interim measure and to ensure trade would continue uninter rupted , PPQ increased the treatment duration by half an hour for all temperature ranges and monitored its effectiveness against all stages of the pest . S ince 2007 when the treatment was revised there has been no interception of Copitarsia sp . This has therefore confirmed the efficacy of the extended treatment.2

**E valuation**  **:** After reviewing the available research and PPQ’s experience with importation of asparagus treated with extended treatment , APHI S’ Treatment Quality Assurance Unit (TQAU) determined that an increase in treatment duration or MB dose was necessary

to ensure treatment efficacy for all stages of the pest , and that half an hour increase in duration was sufficient to achieve the desired level of efficacy . PPQ’s Treatment Advisory

Committee (TAC) reviewed the information and recommended its approval . Old Treatment Schedule T101 -b - 1

New Treatment Schedule T101 -b - 1 as proposed showing an increase in treatment duration. Temperature Dosage Rate 0.5 hours 2 .5 hours 80 F or above 1.5 lbs 19 14 70 - 79 F. 2. 0 lbs 26 19 60 - 69 F. 2.5 lbs 32 24 50 - 59 F. 3.0 lbs 38 29 40 - 49 F. 4. 0 lbs 48 38 **Decision :**  Amend treatment schedule T101 -b - 1 as proposed above . **Originator s**  **:** Laura Jeffers. PPQ - CPHST - TQAU, Pest Exclusion Specialist Josie Cooley . PPQ - RPM, Team Leader/Writer
: 1 ‘ScHeDULE It

rT

alibi

ete
ts

© County of usikliriye |, Btare
vith. day of June, 1880,

of, Firs

si

an

———s

Se

—

2 ateeiemnetmrm Z

|
Deppptice. Horny
A Ee

eam ivr

[Aretha oe 4)'3 10
64.251) Zatarsce, albert, tI 6)
hjabslt

aie

SSE Gee

T6257) hecharerr, band, 1, I r+

1) o

ile > &

Sap ani

mea RS

a7 53

ee.

i;

|

Ec
weer
2hSy

=

S55

po lerteter
EER SS oP

'R 7 “a
SS

Bee

=

Historic census records are maintained and rel

Visit http://www.archives.gov for

the National Archives and Records Administrati

information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

oa 20 907 Z

jon, not the U.S. Census Bureau. Fiat

Pat

%
Opinion issued December 2, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-21-00580-CR

———————————

IN RE JOSEPH NELSON, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Joseph Nelson, acting pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

asserting that he is entitled to an examining trial and complaining of his pre-trial 

detention.

1 Among other things, the petition does not comply with the requirements 

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Joseph Nelson, cause number 20-CR3161, pending in the 122nd District Court of Galveston County, Texas, the 

Honorable John Ellisor presiding.
2

enumerated in the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(a)–

(h), (j)–(k); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7. Accordingly, we deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Landau.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UROQUEST MEDICAL
CORPORATION, INCLUDING THE NOTES THERETO, OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,757,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,852,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,797,611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,606,081
<PP&E>                                       7,632,141
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,805,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,139,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,118,090
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,118
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,079,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,139,352
<SALES>                                     12,947,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,947,140
<CGS>                                        6,520,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,520,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,088,405
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,412,863)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    76,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,488,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,488,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        


</TABLE>
#### Dan JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. The CECO CORPORATION et al., Respondents.

No. 43672.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7714

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAFAEL HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:11-cr-00309-WO-5)

Submitted: April 5, 2017 Decided: May 3, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez appeals the district court’s order granting his motion 

for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). On appeal, he challenges 

the extent of the district court’s reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. The district court reduced his sentence to the bottom of his amended 

Guidelines range based on Amendment 782. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. See United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez, No. 1:11-cr00309-WO-5 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
- cooper1
- cooper2
#### Richard W. DODGE, Appellant, v. PHIL WEINER, INC., Appellee.

No. 69-464.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 24, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Graylin Rusk, Appellant

No. 06-12-00099-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR 11-023). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, 

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of 

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for

further proceedings consistent with the opinion.

We further order that the appellee, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 12, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Table 20.  Homeownership Rates by Race and Ethnicity of Householder


                               1994     1995     1996     1997     1998     1999     2000


U.S. total.................    64.0     64.7     65.4     65.7     66.3     66.8     67.4

  White, total.............    67.7     68.7     69.1     69.3     70.0     70.5     71.1
    White, nonhispanic.....    70.0     70.9     71.7     72.0     72.6     73.2     73.8
  Black, total.............    42.3     42.7     44.1     44.8     45.6     46.3     47.2
  Other race, total/1......    47.7     47.2     51.0     52.5     53.0     53.7     53.5
      American Indian, Aleu    51.7     55.8     51.6     51.7     54.3     56.1     56.2
      Asian or Pacific Isla    51.3     50.8     50.8     52.8     52.6     53.1     52.8
      Other................    36.1     37.4       NA       NA       NA       NA       NA


  Hispanic.................    41.2     42.1     42.8     43.3     44.7     45.5     46.3
  Non-Hispanic.............    65.9     66.7     67.4     67.8     68.3     68.9     69.5


/1 Beginning in 1996, those answering 'other' for race were allocated to one of the 4 race categories--
White, Black, American Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo (one category), or Asian or Pacific Islander.
NA - Not Applicable.
#### Williams, Exrx., et al. *v.*Christopher.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *debatable constitutional question involved.*

(No. 18615

Decided October 21, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

*Mr. L. A. Alcott*and *Messrs. Pugh &*Pugh, for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. James M. Eengst*and *Mr. L. W.*Jones, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Matthias, Day and Conn, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



      I, Jack L. Messman, Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

      (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-K for the period ended
October 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      * * *

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

/s/      Jack L. Messman
---------------------------
Jack L. Messman

Date:  January 28, 2003
SCPW-19-0000432

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

FRANCIS P. GRANDINETTI, Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CR. NO. 93-0141)

ORDER DENYING PETITION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

On December 18, 2019, petitioner Francis P. Grandinetti

filed a document entitled, “On Petition, SC-HI: Supervisory

Writs, Mandamus, Injunctions, and/or Governor’s Stay”. The

document was filed as a petition. Upon consideration of the

document and the record, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied. 

Petitioner should seek the assistance of his recently-appointed

counsel, the Office of the Public Defender, who was appointed by

the third circuit court in Cr. No. 93-0141. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 7, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-19-0000432

07-JAN-2020

02:07 PM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from McCombs
Realty Partners 1998 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759198
<NAME> MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNRS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      115
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,947
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,474)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          5,669
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,457)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,404
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,396
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (95)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.47)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Parthenis BROWN, a/k/a Parthenia Brown, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-541.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.