alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,308,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  221,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,525
<INVENTORY>                                    410,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,832,738
<PP&E>                                      41,300,023
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,403,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,416,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,027,560
<BONDS>                                     13,701,872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,724,484
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,034,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,416,704
<SALES>                                     14,264,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,264,685
<CGS>                                        4,384,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,384,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,435,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             192,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                243,261
<INCOME-TAX>                                    58,383
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            184,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Gregorio AUDEVERT, Relator, v. Honorable Jack M. TURNER, Judge Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-871.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, David
G. Zahka, Chief Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., have reviewed
Talk America Holdings, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 and, based on the inquiries I have made or caused to
be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief Financial Officer
of Talk America Holdings, Inc., I hereby certify that:
 
 (i) the
Talk America Holdings, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America Holdings,
Inc.
 
 This
certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
Financial Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other
purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Talk America Holdings, Inc.
 
 /s/
David G. Zahka
 David G.
Zahka
 Chief
Financial Officer
 April 25,
2005
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                        Three months ended March 29, 1997

                                   (Unaudited)



(In millions)

Earnings:
   Earnings before income taxes                                      $226
   Fixed charges:
     Minority interest in net earnings of
       consolidated subsidiaries (1)                                   21
     Interest expense                                                  12
                                                                     ----
                                                                     $259
                                                                     ====

Fixed charges:
   Minority interest in net earnings of
     consolidated subsidiaries (2)                                   $ 30
   Interest expense                                                    12
                                                                     ----
                                                                     $ 42
                                                                     ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                   6.17
                                                                     ====


(1) Minority  interest in net  earnings of  consolidated  subsidiaries  includes
    dividends on subsidiary's preferred stock.

(2) The  fixed  charges  amount   for  minority  interest  in  net  earnings  of
    consolidated subsidiaries  represents the pretax earnings amount which would
    be required to cover such fixed charges as calculated below:


                Subsidiary's Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
                -------------------------------------------------         
                             100% - Income Tax Rate

    The  income  tax rate is based on the  relationship  of  the  provision  for
    income taxes to earnings before income taxes for the respective period.


                                        7
### Fw: single source question and TX public participation

Jeffrey Robinson to: Adina Wiley 12/10/2012 08:47 PM

From: Jeffrey Robinson/R6/USEPA/US

To: "Adina Wiley" <wiley.adina@epa.gov>

----- Forwarded by Jeffrey Robinson/R6/USEPA/US on 12/10/2012 08:46 PM -----

From: Bill Harnett/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Jeffrey Robinson/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Diggs/R6/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/30/2012 12:16 PM

Subject: Fw: single source question and TX public participation

Dear Jeff and Tom

Please docket the below e-mail in the Texas Public Participation Notice docket. I contacted Kelly today

and recommended if she wished to meet with the Agency she should work through the Region to set up

any such meeting. The other issue is not related to the rulemaking and I am following up on that issue.

Bill

E-mail: harnett.bill@epa.gov

Phone: (919)541-4979

Cell:(919)608-5276

----- Forwarded by Bill Harnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 10/30/2012 01:13 PM -----

From: Kelly Haragan <kharagan@law.utexas.edu>

To: Bill Harnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/29/2012 02:35 PM

Subject: single source question and TX public participation

Hi Bill

– hope all is well. Wondering if you might be able to recommend someone at EPA who could talk to my

students about the single source determination and, in particular, about how EPA determines whether a facility

has properly classified itself with respect to SIC code.

In addition, I’d like to touch base with you re. the Texas air permitting program and public participation. As you

probably know, the issues in our petition relating to public participation are still unaddressed and I hear EPA is

about to act on the Texas public participation in a way that, in my mind, is a change of past policy and will move us

backwards in terms of having transparent, accessible permitting.

Thanks.

Kelly HaraganEnvironmental Clinic, Director

University of Texas School of Law

727 East Dean Keeton

Austin, TX 78705

(512) 232

‐ 2654 office

(512) 232

‐ 2311 fax

(512) 587

‐ 9318 cell

kharagan@law.utexas.edu
MDE

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

1800 Washington Boulevard o Baltimore MD 21230

410-537 -3000 o l-800-633-6101

Martin O'Malley

Govemor

Anthony G. Brown

Lieutenant Governor

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D.

Secretarv

December 6,2011

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin

Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region 3

1650 Arch Street (3RA00)

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Dear Mr. Garvin:

The purpose of this letter is to supplementhe State Implementation Plan Revision #07-13 submitted to your

office on October 24,2007 concerning requirements for the construction of new major sources and major

modifications under Maryland's nonattainment New Source Review program. Maryland has existing

regulatory programs for sources that do not exceed the major source threshold.

On December 21,2007, EPA promulgated the final NSR rule regarding recordkeeping and reporting

requirements commonly referred to as the "reasonable possibility" provisions (72 FR 72607). Because these

requirements were finalized after the submission of SIP Revision #07-13, the proposed SIP revision does not

include these provisions. Howevel, as noted in the preamble to the final rule, in lieu of adopting the new

requirements States may maintain alternate SIP approved program requirements that have the effect of

making their. regulations more stringent than the new rules. Maryland believes that the preconstruction

permitting requirements of COMAR 26.1 1.02, which require permits for all but the smallest sources, exceed

the requirements of 40 CFR 51.165 (aX6) and (a)(6)(vi). Please accepthis letter as acknowledgement that

Maryland' s re gulations fulfi ll the se requirements.

We appreciate the opportunity to indicate these requirements have been part of our permitting program for

many years. If you wish to discuss these issues further, please do not hesitate to contact me at 410-537-3084

or George (Tad) Abum, Director of the Air and Radiation Management Administration, at 410)-537-3255.

Sincerely,

4/ffi(L Robert M. Summers. Ph.D.

Secretary

cc: George (Tad) Abum, Director, Air and Radiation Managembnt Administration

Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning Program

Karen Irons, Program Manager, Air Quality Permits Program

TTY Users 1-800-735-2258

Via Maryland Relay Service

@ Recycledtaper www.mde.state.md.us
Sa I TE a ral ne re 1 le eS ee nL at th NL We —— — ee eS eee ee

TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES.

s?

_ SCHEDULE No. J —POPUL ATION. | ee: District No, =.=

Enumeration District No.

Name of Institution,

[Insert name of townshiptown, Seek istrict, or other 7 divjsion, as the cage may be. See i ee oad

Name of incorporated city, town, or village, within the alove-named division, OEP Ge

4f
Enumerated by me on the (<2 __... day of June, 1900,.——_———

LOCATION. NAME RELATION. PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. NATIVITY. CITIZENSHIP. pe a re i OR EDUCATION, OWNERSHIP OF HOME.

of each person TEN YEARS of age
and over.

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If born In the United
States, give ie State or Territory; if of foreign birth, give the Country only,

—
y

Mother of how many

children,

of each person whose place of
abode on June.1, 1900, was Pars oe
in this family.

IN CITIES.

Relationship of cach
person to the head
of the family.

Enter surname first, then the given name and <
middle initial, ifany. Place of birth of this Place of birth of Fatuxn Place of birth of Moture

PEESON. : of this person. of this person, OccupArtox:

United States,
cinployed,
months),

Inciype every person living on June 1, 1900.
Omrr children born since June 1, 1900,

Ownod fren of morignged,
Number of farm schodule,

Attondod selool (in

house, In tho order of

vialtation,
widowed, or divorced.
Year of fiomigratlon to
tho United States,
Number of years in the

Whether single, married,
Number uf those children

Color or rnce,
Ago ut last birtlilay,
Number of yeara marricl,
living.
Naturulization,
Montha not
Can road
Can write,
Can apeak Hagllad,
Owned or rented,
Farm of house,

Number of dwelling-

Numbor of family, tn the
order of visitation

House Number.

i

ut
w
J!

A
NI

=
oH SN Fe ——_

ee ene

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

oo 2 fm o& ~~ © BD be

—
o

—
~~

_
no

Visit http:/Mwww.archives.gov for more information about publicly

available records like the one shown here.
tg AEs — CFV LOGI a |\42 Peg od gm oi Glee tet, CZgsor aetey.
roe

—
a)

="
ye

=
on

OES ol g VBE SF ae

LoovR. Zz ye aA ae ie ee
LenS Lipecffph lage lee.

~
oa

—
2

eH
Oo 7

ro)
o

~w
part

Bor

LP ZB Le
CA gt ett vey | LA Zot oe 3 —

fat ce

4

EZ preboushe

LLL
iu “Y
SA STE Th a oR LL Se

: a E 4 2 , ; : x he ae P : : ; ) 5 : J Py
= ithe r < ai = s FN r “7 fa d Ze eon | EES 2 it ££: =
Wa Aa Lipase Gp
LE: ; g eC Z
, VA Z 4 oZ 3

| fee:  tlbPC Lez AZ,

wi
Lh pa EZ

fberathles.

ew ee ee ee ee ee ee

| [een toe

ee = eee
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 99-60458 Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GLEN FREDERICK DIXON, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(4:98-CR-ALL-WS)

_________________________________________________________________ July 7, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Glen Frederick Dixon, Sr., appeals his jury-trial conviction

and sentence for stabbing Officer Bradley Alex with the intent to

do bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 113(a)(3).

Dixon contends the district court erred in enhancing his

sente nce three levels, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(b), for

resisting arrest. He claims the altercation did not occur during

a valid stop because the officer did n ot have a warrant wit h him

and was unsure whether there was one at the station.

We review the sentencing court’s application of the Sentencing

Guidelines de novo and accept its fact-findings unless they are- 2 -

clearly erroneous. U nited States v. Rodriguez-Guzman

, 56 F.3d 18,

20 (5th Cir. 1995). Of course, we defer to its credibility

determinations

. E.g., United States v. Sotelo

, 97 F.3d 782, 799

(5th Cir. 1996).

At the sentencing hearing, the court noted it had heard

Officer Alex’s testimony at trial and found t he offense occurred

while Dixon was resisting arrest, indicating it believed the

Officer’s testimony. Dixon has not demonstrated that this finding

was clearly erroneous.

Dixon maintains also that, prior to or during trial, the

district court should have ordered, sua sponte

, a mental competency

examination pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241. We review such failure

for abuse of discretion. U nited States v. Davis

, 61 F.3d 291, 303

(1995).

In his six-line appellate argument, Dixon alludes to testimony

concerning his substance abuse and resulting impairment to his

mental condition, mentions that his behavior at trial was erratic,

and refers to an attempted suicide. However, Dixon failed to

provide any c itations to the record in support of these

contentions. For an argument to be reviewed on appeal, it must

contain citations to the part of the record relied upon. F E D

. R.

A PP

. P. 28(a)(9)(A). Because it is n ot adequately briefed, the

issue is considered waived. S ee United States v. Gourley

, 168 F.3d

165, 172-73 n.11, cert. denied

, 120 S. Ct. 72 (1999). And, because

the suici de attempt, and resulting mental examination, occurred

after trial, the district court c ould n ot have relied on it as- 3 -

justification for questioning Dixon’s competency to earlier stand

trial.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


      In connection with the Annual Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,
that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





                                         /s/ R. ALAN MILLER
                                         -------------------------
                                         R. Alan Miller
                                         Chief Financial Officer


Date:  March  24, 2006
# C_2022198EN.01004401.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Stryker v EUIPO (RUGGED)

(Case T-204/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark RUGGED - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Competence of the Board of Appeal - Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2022/C 198/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Stryker Corp. (Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States) (represented by: I. Fowler, I. Junkar and B. Worbes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 January 2021 (Case R 370/2020-5), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark RUGGED.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Stryker Corp. is to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Stryker Corp. is to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.

---
G S T


G L O B A L
- S M A R T . T E CH 


S I N C E 2 0
2 2


 


 


 


85320, Tivat, Montenegro


+12052165924


office@global-smart.tech


 


 


 


Loan Agreement Between


Yehor Rodin(Lender) and


Global-Smart.Tech
(Company)


 


 


This Agreement made on May 30, 2022


 


This Loan Agreement (the
“Agreement”) is made between the first part Global-Smart.Tech, located at Kava b.b. 85320, Tivat, Montenegro (the “Company”),
and the second part, Yehor Rodin Kava b.b. 85320, Tivat, Montenegro (“Lender”). In respect that:


		·	The Company requires funding in connection with business operations;



·                                  
Lender has agreed to loan $100,000 (the “Loan Amount”) to the Company, on certain terms
and conditions contained herein; Now therefore these agreement witnesses:


In consideration, if the Company needs more than
THIRTY THOUSAND (30,000) US DOLLARS from Lender, this Agreement becomes useful. The parties hereto agree as follows:


·                              
Lender hereby has agreed to loan the Loan Amount to the Company in the event of not raising enough
funds from the offering in accordance with the Form S-1 registration statement of the Company;


		·	Lender hereby agrees to loan the Loan Amount to the Company on demand of the Company;



		·	Lender will be repaid from revenues of the Company when it starts earning significant revenues;



		·	Advanced Loan funds are non-interest bearing, secured and payable upon demand;



·                             
Any additional funds that Lender loans to the Company after this Agreement are subject to the same
terms as this Agreement unless otherwise agreed in writing.


In witness, whereof:


The
parties hereto have agreed to the terms above, and the Agreement becomes effective in the day and year first above written.


 


 


 


Signature of Yehor Rodin (Lender) 


 


Signature of Global-Smart.Tech (Company)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          129
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        5,077
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              0
<LOANS>                                      28,129
<ALLOWANCE>                                     173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               34,357
<DEPOSITS>                                   22,091
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             263
<LONG-TERM>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         77
<OTHER-SE>                                   11,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               34,357
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               1,655
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                79
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                164
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              1,898
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              787
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         1,111
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    12
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 388
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      388
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    257
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.36
<LOANS-NON>                                     695
<LOANS-PAST>                                    294
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 763
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                169
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     0
<RECOVERIES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               173
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            173
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0
        


</TABLE>