alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Thursday, August 2, 2018.

# PLACE:

                        Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street                         *(All visitors must use Diagonal Road Entrance),*                         Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.                    

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. 2018 Mid-Session Budget.

2. Continuation of Federal Credit Union Loan Interest Rate Ceiling.

3. Final Suspension and Debarment Procedures.

4. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Loans to Members.

5. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Risk-Based Capital.

*Recess:*                     11:30 a.m.                

# TIME AND DATE:

11:45 a.m., Thursday, August 2, 2018.

# PLACE:

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Supervisory Action. Closed pursuant to Exemption (8).

2. Supervisory Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (8), (9)(i)(B) and (9)(ii).

3. Supervisory Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (6), (8), (9)(i)(B) and (9)(ii) and (10).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Gerard Poliquin,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-16340 Filed 7-26-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7749

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REGINALD LEVETTE GORDON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-99-24; CA-01-337)

Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: March 31, 2004

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Levette Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Scott Broyles,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Gordon seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Gordon has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
No. 00-6403.

#### Wilson *v.*Illinois.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.
#### FLORIDA GEORGIA TELEVISION CO. v. COHN.

No. 38421.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 23, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 218 So.2d 787.
#### Leon FARRINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-779.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 5, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Steven Rappaport, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Gary M. Carman, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant below appeals from conviction of the offenses of manslaughter and aggravated assault.

In a bar, the appellant shot and wounded a barmaid and then shot and killed a man who was present therein. For the latter offense he was indicted and tried for murder in the first degree, with a conviction of manslaughter resulting. He was convicted of aggravated assault as to the woman. The sentences imposed were for 10 and S years imprisonment, respectively, to be served concurrently. On appeal therefrom the appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the murder charge, on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to prove the corpus delicti. That contention is refuted by the record, by which it is disclosed there was competent substantial evidence sufficient therefor, taking into consideration the quantum of proof required. No useful purpose would be served by recitation of the evidence here.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,578,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  427,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,842
<INVENTORY>                                  1,323,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,139,742
<PP&E>                                      45,781,238
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,313,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,105,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,635,521
<BONDS>                                     15,556,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,755,418
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,100,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,105,999
<SALES>                                     19,587,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,587,393
<CGS>                                        6,822,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,822,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,624,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             358,959
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                718,978
<INCOME-TAX>                                   205,987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            512,991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   512,991
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1537 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1537

    To ensure that any new or revised requirement providing for the 
 screening, testing, or treatment of individuals operating commercial 
  motor vehicles for sleep disorders is adopted through a rulemaking 
                  proceeding, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2013

 Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To ensure that any new or revised requirement providing for the 
 screening, testing, or treatment of individuals operating commercial 
  motor vehicles for sleep disorders is adopted through a rulemaking 
                  proceeding, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATOR REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 
              SLEEP DISORDERS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation may implement or 
enforce a requirement providing for the screening, testing, or 
treatment (including consideration of all possible treatment 
alternatives) of individuals operating commercial motor vehicles for 
sleep disorders only if the requirement is adopted pursuant to a 
rulemaking proceeding.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to a requirement 
that was in force before September 1, 2013.
    (c) Sleep Disorders Defined.--In this section, the term ``sleep 
disorders'' includes obstructive sleep apnea.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jack LANGER and David Langer, as Executors of the Estate of Minnie Langer, deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Sidney W. LANGER, Appellee.

No. 67-576.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 19, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

                              THE GILLETTE COMPANY
                                 Certification
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
                                     Code)


Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, the undersigned, James M. Kilts,  Chief Executive Officer
of The Gillette Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Date:   July 29, 2004                      /s/ James M. Kilts
                                           ___________________________________
                                           James M. Kilts
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Gillette Company (the "Company") and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Nae oF stern

| DEPARTMENT OF COMMEROE-AND LABOR-BUREAU OF THE OENSUS

THIRTEENTH CENSUS OF THE- UNITED STATES: S10" FOPULATION

Peevey

sessseeOctszexeers Oe

Historie census records are maintain

ved an

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available

1d released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

records like the one shown here.

BL Paicieail did Soe aes
Fla/ads || .

we peitiee s || 1 | | Z

WG oom 2 | + it

tence pe | | gens
PY SLAIN LOT AIG OA Ee PEO ee I Rt ee ert ee a eee
“ rt * > « ato he es a al Bum Shins tae ye ae RYE Peak PP 5 Ar A r

I
t

vy) ? oe ages mabe 7 16, s0d-17 aro aot to bo ak in report to infant Inquiries numbered.11, 12, 15, 16 byt 19, a
+ | Dees merely by an affirmative mark, as /.

Scuepute 1.—Inhabitants in Phos e.. ____, in the County of ee , State
ae Vike, , 1870. |
a, | te ty <=
ees ee Ass't Marshal.

CONSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONS,

_——

| VALUE OF REat Estate
OWNED.

“|
| | Whether deaf
and dumb,
blind, insane,
or idiotic.

&o.)

8,

ts

cd or cbridged on

3

t 4
ve months

fraction
fractions,
Color.—White (W.), Black

The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

us, 545

If born within the year, state

s Jost birth-da

i

Profession, Occupation, Place of Birth, naming State
or Trade of each person, or Territory of U. §.; or the
male or female. Country, if of foreign birth.

—

of visitation,

Real Estate.

»
C r
rite,

—

© Families, numbered in the order

RTE TN eS ent Se R abepie c I ee”

Ce 5 er
‘

the order of visitation,
l year, 3
21 yeara of age and up-
e right to vate
grounds than re-
m or other crime.

month (Jan., Feb, &c.)
wards,

month (Jan,, Feb.

=

Nule Citizens of U.S. of

——

who
deni
othe

1) belli

| Attended school within the year.

Dwelllng-houses, numbered in
(B.), Mulatto (M.), Chi-| *
nese (C.), Indian (I,)

Value of Personnl Estate.
If married within the year, state

Sinle Citizens of U.S. of 21
years of age und upward

Fother of foreign birth
| Mother of foreign birth.

Value of
| Cannot read.
Cannot w

der
in

Age
u

|
|

) t
oy Sy ery

—

=

$$$ —____—_

pea
aes
="
ve)
="
|
—_
Gr
pl
a}
w
—

i

@
| ©

, TS
. se

er

a

'
|
1
.
———_

———

}
|

ao
CC 277! hy oP, a

|
|
|
|

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Ves i rd |
oj i eptaiy’ ad peos
~ eee oh cand nas -< o-

tos

22 \IAS c 7 _|_ Zee rae a | a=
2 “ Ve ? ; «4 é Pefejpjhip |
Pay
22\|y . | oe

2 PAS f ‘é : ; ° 2
| Qaeca Hebb acer: \SK cz Z ~i zz | SSA | Yecseveath par

2 =

|= CL ig abeel Js | , Le. ey & : : Meets 2s bet:

= Lha2 Xe BzG, As

WA c2ed art Dp
te ge aero jt {_

= De
=— euanper <9
é

banc pate

—— te mene ee

ow ere ete

| ae eres Arte

© emer eee Senta sae e
’

Kec ege ec: coYY

Z,

Qu t+4¢ DNS ect

«+ reet pame +0
’

Tew eet

ave 27 eh ee

Ie. =< | Mla t icin
ea ee =

i
| .
it
4
i
'
f
Pi
i
t
i
.

a MAB mone a Rese
“ ne en ee ooo
.

Mer 20

SRPAASE AER

SSPSSHSHSA|A

Re NS
Sh

—_

Saas

lala] -
srlul @ leet cul fk aaotl

No. of dwellings, 2 No. of white females, << No. of males, foreign born,

“< « families, _ 5 “ « colored males, _“@G  “ “females, “ “

= “ white males, Zz = Jo 66 hd females. x “ce blind,
= ————>} = —— ——
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Claude OTIS.

No. 61327.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., would grant the writ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-26-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           18,048
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     3,101
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 22,097
<CASH>                                         297
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             4,896
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         1,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,416
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                20,834

<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            2,385
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          1,749
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    150
<COMMON>                                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   36,416
<PREMIUMS>                                     3,396
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            573
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             336
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 87
<BENEFITS>                                     2,557
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    856
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                590
<INCOME-TAX>                                   167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            423
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   423
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0


</TABLE>
#### Gilbert POWELL, Petitioner, v. CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, Respondent.

No. 69-671.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 4, 1969.

Appeal quashed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANTHONY CRUZ , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 1 9

- 284

[ April 25, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.85 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara R. Duffy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09

- 004601

- CF

- 10A

.
Anthony Cruz

, Florida City

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , G ROSS and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134689 & (35) (36) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134689 

 COA: 275273 

Jackson CC: 03-000983-FH 

RICHARD JEFFREY KINT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motions for miscellaneous relief are DENIED. 

s1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2007 

 Clerk
#### The State vs. Grace.

In an indictment for playing cards on Sunday, it is not necessary to allege the name of the game played. *(Siot/den vs. The State,*18 *Ark-*1S6.)

*Error to Jefferson Circuit Court.*

Hon. John C. Murray, Circuit Judge.

Mr. Attorney General Hollowell, for the State.

Mr. Justice Compton

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendant in error was indicted under *sec. 9, chap.*51, *Gould's Dig.,*for playing cards on Sunday.

On motion *of*the defendant, the court quashed the indictment, *228because it did not allege the name of the game played. According to the principle decided in *Stogden vs. State,*18 *Ark.*18 (1, such allegation was not necessary. See also *The State vs. Purnell,*16 *Ark.*507-8.

The judgment must be reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1180
<ALLOWANCES>                                        66
<INVENTORY>                                        540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1663
<PP&E>                                           10771
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10257
<BONDS>                                           7000
<COMMON>                                            40
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             6500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6188
<SALES>                                           2139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2139
<CGS>                                              990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    248
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (25)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                273
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—SUREAU OF THE CENSUS 3 <80 ‘pes
| Behe) type OF THE UNITED STATES: 1920—-POPULATION —
NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE whee Phin, Soren.

joann deste dpiet a aS on ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE Meese’ Hx $3 DAY OF

PLACE OF ABODE. NAME RELATION. TOmaE. PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. CITIZENSHIP. | EDUCATION. . NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE
“of each person whose weet eee on ij Hel; 2 ; Place of birth ef cach perven aad paresis of cach perves sunmersied. Be Bsen bn tho Tatled Matos, pore Shs slate or tamtiary. Lf of faretga birth, give the place of birth

: e anuary 1, was in ow Hg $ and, iz addition, the mother teages.

mene presume iy ons | HH

= 2 —-

Nataralized of

alien.
ir matere it

oe

ih = a Place of birth. cet Se ER =a Seinen beta:

ie Lt

a ae i

Historic census records a are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

coe _tno ak &@ we

~~ —- Fe bee
eo we O&O

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

a
oe

ry
ao

ae
Heenan...

Lew ts Z

16
17
18
ip
20]
a1
2
23
al
25
26
27
28
29
« 80
31
82
83
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
asi
49
50