alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**ON REHEARING**
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6365** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

**No. 12**  **- 6372** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. ( 2:03

- cr - 00010

- RBS

- 1 )

Submitted : June 14, 2012 Decided: October 18, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, New port News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and motion for reconsideration un der Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We affirm the denial of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) relief for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cross , No. 2:03

- cr - 000 10

- RBS

- 1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2012 )
. * Because the district court la cked the authority to consider Cross’s motion for reconsideration, see United States v. Goodwyn , 596 F.3d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the district court’s order denying the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* In our previous opinion, the date of the district court’s order was incorrect. The opinion after rehearing corrects the date.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Theresa Kingsberry, Program Support Specialist, Federal Trade Commission Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room CC-5301, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326-3100.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-16025 Filed 7-26-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.2

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
                                                        ----------------------------------------------
                                                           NUMBER           PERCENT       EQUIVALENT
                                                          OF SHARES       OUTSTANDING       SHARES
                                                        -------------     -----------     ------------
<S>                                                     <C>               <C>             <C>      
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                     2,300,000          100.00%       2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                    702,486           95.45%         670,519
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock               15,310,943          100.00%      15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                             11,242,857          100.00%      11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                              4,323,874          100.00%       4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                               6,000,000          100.00%       6,000,000
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                  58,431          100.00%          58,431
   1997 Warrants Exercised                                     48,300          100.00%          48,300
                                                        -------------                     ------------
                                                           39,986,891                       39,954,924

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                         39,954,924

NET LOSS                                                                                  ($10,600,389)


NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                              ($0.27)
                                                                                          ============
</TABLE>
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 12

- 00205

- CR

WILLIAM LOUIS WALTON, Appellant

V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 40741

- B

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 

### O RDER

J. Brandt Thorson, counsel for William Louis Walton, has filed a motion to extend time

to file the appellant’s brief. The brief was due March 4, 2013. In his motion, counsel does not provide the Court with a reasonable explanation of the need for an extension of time, stating only that “Counsel for Appellant has had inadequate time
[to] review the record and fully develop argument regarding the points of error to be asserted herein.” This Court interprets Rule 10.5(b)(2) of the Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure as requiring counsel to provide the Court with specific information to justify the req uested extension, including the cause numbers of other briefs filed, the dates they were filed, the dates of trials, how long those trials are expected to last, etc. Broad, general statements do not provide the required facts and are not adequate to meet the requirements of the rule. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
10.5(b)(2).

All future motions to extend time must contain case

- specific information adequate to justify the request, or they will be denied. In this instance, we grant the motion for an extension, for a period of thirty days, making appellant’s brief now due April 3, 2013. Further requests for extensions will not be looked upon

with favor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: March 5 , 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          9
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000

 <S>                                        <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
  <PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
  <CASH>                                         11,778
  <INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            605
  <FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
  <TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
  <INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    48,352
  <INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         13,485
  <INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           13,337
  <LOANS>                                       220,215
  <ALLOWANCE>                                     2,437
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                300,406
  <DEPOSITS>                                    232,051
  <SHORT-TERM>                                   22,629
  <LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,306
  <LONG-TERM>                                    22,000
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
  <PREFERRED>                                         0
  <COMMON>                                        1,805
  <OTHER-SE>                                     19,615
  <TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                300,406
  <INTEREST-LOAN>                                13,185
  <INTEREST-INVEST>                               2,606
  <INTEREST-OTHER>                                   89
  <INTEREST-TOTAL>                               15,880
  <INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              7,177
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              8,978
  <INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           6,902
  <LOAN-LOSSES>                                     450
  <SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
  <EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 4,943
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,543
  <INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      2,543
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
  <CHANGES>                                           0
  <NET-INCOME>                                    1,798
  <EPS-BASIC>                                    2.08
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.08
  <YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.65
  <LOANS-NON>                                       759
  <LOANS-PAST>                                        0
  <LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
  <LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 2,375
  <ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                2,099
  <CHARGE-OFFS>                                     135
  <RECOVERIES>                                       23
  <ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               2,437
  <ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            2,437
  <ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
  <ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Coates International, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”), I, George J. Coates, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 12, 2010
By:
/s/ George J. CoatesGeorge J. CoatesPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors of
  Jillian's Entertainment Corporation
Boston, Massachusetts

        We hereby consent to the use in Jillian's Entertainment Corporation's
Form 10-KSB, of our report dated May 21, 1997 relating to the Jillian's 
Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries consolidated balance sheet as of 
March 31, 1997 and 1996 and the consolidated statements of operations, changes 
in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended.



                                                              BDO Seidman, LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 29, 1997
Soc ~ pevanrnent Et ESSE canon-sunens oF Te cobain sag jewel poner Pa
Pare THIRTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED “STATES: 1910: POPULATION ‘Enguenation DistiieT:No. 424
a he) Maw oF wiconrovatid Mince - Plc Ce Ce aoe = a
nb eae z . ee

a
a i

nari
© tnt Fy [los
Lind em: Hiatinindom fzei all ics

ph a0

Aa. | nn nie_|
eh get 7 i OAs Ga ss taaend
peace : ae :

Eee
ened : ian 2 oe,
LE : Z 4 Bah

feat
Lyed

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Burs

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

TEPPePSUETEETeGreceseEEEs
ased by
the National Archives and Records Administration,

not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http:/Mwww.archives.gov for more information about publicly ; . ; bis

available records like the one shown here.
a i ek
, 

Th~ name of nery perwon wbON 

p~ of abode OD the Bm ifAj' of 

Johe, 1870, wu In th1e tatnllr. 

Protealon, · Oocupatl:Jn, 

or Tm.d9 of ~ ~oo, 

male oT female. · 

i ! 

! J 'II 'S 

_L_ ~ 

8 0 

I i 

[3 !3 a- ·~or Blrthi namldg 8t.te 1 1 ai !Ii i or Terillorj of· Ui 8.; or lht i f ~ .. Cotinl17, U otlorelgn blrth. I ;'l:f 'II 'II •' 1 f ,.o. 

j 1 !1 n I A A " 10 11 12 13 ... lO 10117 

Whtthe~dut 

.and dumb', 

bltnd, inMn~, 

or ldloUo. 

18 

i

--- ____ 

~~~1,__~_1___ - 

--- -t- . 

~----·--- ---~-

' 

--------------

CL.L..~~1L.._._,_L ____ ~ ___ : ----

_ _L_ e __ 

-------

I

. _. ,_·. _ ~ _, -· __ ,

- ___ ,,
I

Pago No! AF
apoini- Die. No.2

SCHEDULE Inhabitants in

ual ;

i
i

jine June 4, 1970, and «

ttl ann

st be OMETFED| Memes amin wd hve
Hand fe nt fb ake geo prans under 1 ee

ng on the tt say of i,

; ED IN sue 1

: | , in hy County of, asf
mn the. AE. day of Jung, 18:
i

No gos teen i Nee

nae!
1. 84

esi
fasica |

lot

ie

Mie Nae
ibe Gillin

Hien

Reece SS ANTE

Raweginy —\lo}?

Lup |i Ines!

Day Dte.. Male bs

1499) Wea. diva. 26

MS.

Historie census records

Mace

ob bags: Adc, a
AO) Mecweunts (EM... | 17 Bo...
a —lealenl 2.
usate Ui? J ss?
pp arbi VLIE BM.

Visit http://www archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not

i

V
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1504 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1504

          To increase funds set aside for off-system bridges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2013

 Mr. Casey (for himself and Mr. Blunt) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To increase funds set aside for off-system bridges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIDGES NOT ON FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS.

    Section 133(g)(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``15 percent'' and inserting ``25 percent''.
                                 <all>
```
#### ALABAMA HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. v. HOME HEALTH CARE AGENCY OF NORTH ALABAMA, INC.

SC 2586.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1977.

*1354S. P. Keith, Birmingham, for appellant.

James B. Kierce, Jr. of Stone, Patton & Kierce, Bessemer, for appellee.

FAULKNER, Justice.

Alabama Home Health Care, Inc., incorporated in 1970, has offices in Birmingham and Bessemer. Home Health Care Agency of North Alabama, Inc., incorporated in 1975, has offices in the same cities.

Testimony indicated that Alabama Home received many telephone calls and mail deliveries intended for Home Health Care Agency of North Alabama.

In June, 1976, Mr. Beard, who operated Alabama Home, had the telephone listing (white pages) of his corporation changed to “Home Health Care, Inc. of Alabama.” He admitted that although he did this in an attempt to clear up the confusion and uncertainty, there has probably been an increase in the uncertainty since the listing change was made. There was testimony that confusion existed both before the listing change, and after.

Alabama Home, the plaintiff, sued under Tit. 10, § 21(4)(1), Code of Alabama, 1973 Supp., seeking an injunction to require the defendant to discontinue use of its name, “Home Health Care Agency of North Alabama, Inc.”

Defendant counterclaimed, asking that the plaintiff be required to discontinue use of the name “Home Health Care, Inc. of Alabama” (as listed in the phone book after June, 1976).

After a hearing ore tenus, the trial court found that (1) the defendant’s name was not so similar to the plaintiff’s as to create confusion in the minds of the public; (2) “Home Health Care, Inc. of Alabama” (plaintiff’s phone listing name) is so similar to the defendant’s name as to create confusion and uncertainty; and (3) “Home Health Care, Inc. of Alabama” (plaintiff’s phone listing name) “. . . is a name assumed by the plaintiff and its use is not authorized by law.” The court denied plaintiff’s requested relief, granted defendant’s requested relief and taxed costs against plaintiff.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under the ore tenus rule. The evidence does not show that the court was palpably wrong and unjust. See *Food Centers, Inc. v. Davis,*286 Ala. 629, 244 So.2d 576 (1971).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and' EMBRY, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 14 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 14

   To provide for the partial settlement of certain claims under the 
                  Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 26, 2013

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the partial settlement of certain claims under the 
                  Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southeast Alaska Native Land 
Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Maps.--The term ``maps'' means the maps entitled 
        ``Sealaska Land Entitlement Finalization'', numbered 5 and 9 of 
        17, and dated October 17, 2012.
            (2) Sealaska.--The term ``Sealaska'' means the Sealaska 
        Corporation, a Regional Native Corporation established under 
        the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et 
        seq.).
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
            (4) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of Alaska.

SEC. 3. SOUTHEAST ALASKA PARTIAL NATIVE LAND CONVEYANCE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act and subject to valid existing rights and subsection (b), 
the Secretary shall convey to Sealaska the 2 parcels of Federal land 
comprising approximately 3,380 acres, as generally depicted on the 
maps, in partial fulfillment of the remaining land entitlement of 
Sealaska under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 
Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)).
    (b) Public Easements.--The conveyance under subsection (a) shall be 
subject to the condition that the Secretary identify and reserve, by 
the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, 
public easements under section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims 
Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1616(b); 85 Stat. 708) with respect to the 
Federal land conveyed under subsection (a).
    (c) Treatment of Land Conveyed.--The Federal land conveyed to 
Sealaska under subsection (a) shall be considered to be land conveyed 
by the Secretary under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims 
Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)).
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Josephine HILL.

No. 53075.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 26, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 1973.

Richard R. Storms, Ruston, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., LeRoy A. Hartley, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Ragan D. Madden, Dist. Atty., O. L. Waltman, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Barham, Tate and Calogero, JJ., were of the opinion that a rehearing should be granted.

BAILES, Justice.

The defendant, Josephine Hill, was tried by a jury and convicted of the crime of manslaughter, La.R.S. 14:31, and sentenced to serve nine (9) years in the state penitentiary. During the proceedings she had perfected four bills of exceptions, but has only urged one bill on this appeal.

Defendant’s single bill of exceptions was taken to the trial court’s overruling of her motion to quash the bill of information. The motion to quash alleged a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights by virtue of La.C.Cr.P. Art. 402 and Art. 7, Sec. 41 of the Louiisana Constitution of 1921.

Our holding in the case of State v. Enloe, La., 276 So.2d 283, decided this date, is dispositive of the issue raised by this bill of exceptions. For the reasons therein assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

BARHAM, J., dissents for reasons assigned in State v. Enloe, this date, La., 276 So.2d 283.

TATE, J., dissents for reasons assigned in State v. Enloe, rendered this date.
#### Clarence C. OWEN, Appellant, v. Al RUMMEL and Reida Joyce Rummel, Appellees.

No. 7441.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 8, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification

of

PSB Holdings, Inc.

under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the Company) certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d), and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date:  August 10, 2007



PETER W. KNITT

Peter W. Knitt

President and CEO





SCOTT M. CATTANACH

Scott M. Cattanach

Treasurer

(Chief Financial Officer)