alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Robert K. Weiler, as Chief Executive Officer of Giga Information
Group, Inc. ("Giga") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30,
2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Giga.



Dated:  August 14, 2002

                                            ROBERT K. WEILER
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Robert K. Weiler,
                                            Chief Executive Officer of Giga
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16111]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 
30109.
    Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to 
have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed 
Commission action.
* * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-16111 Filed 7-24-18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### Nathaniel WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 36569.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 200 So.2d 280.
#### Sylvia G. FIERMAN et vir, Appellants, v. MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATER MIAMI, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 69-900.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 15, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

83 FR 35041, July 24, 2018.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

 Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

 The following matter will also be considered during the 2 p.m. Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, July 26, 2018:

Formal order of investigation

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                         For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the                               ( print page 35513)                            Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.                    

Dated: July 23, 2018.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-16035 Filed 7-24-18; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

                           [LETTERHEAD OF BANK EXIM]


                                $25,000,000.00

                                BANK GUARANTEE
                                --------------
                             NO. **7/****-**/*/**


CURRENCY       :UNITED STATES DOLLARS
AMOUNT         :US$ 25,000,000.00 (US DOLLARS TWENTY FIVE MILLION)
ISSUED AT      :JAKARTA-INDONESIA
ISSUED DATE    :OCTOBER 21, 1998
MATURITY DATE  :OCTOBER 21, 2000

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, WE THE UNDERSIGNED, PT. BANK EKSPOR IMPOR INDONESIA
(PERSERO) JAKARTA PLAZA EXIM BRANCH, JL. JEND. GATOT SUBROTO KAV. 36-38
INDONESIA, HEREBY ISSUE OUR IRREVOCABLE, UNCONDITIONAL, TRANSFERABLE DIVISIBLE
AND WITHOUT PROTEST OR NOTIFICATION PROMISE TO PAY AGAINST THIS BANK GUARANTEE
TO THE ORDER OF **** **** THE BEARER OR HOLDER THERE OF WILL BE PAID AT MATURITY
OCTOBER 21, 1998 TO OCTOBER 21, 2000 THE SUM OF US$ 25,000,000.00 (US DOLLARS
TWENTY FIVE MILLION) IN THE LAWFUL CURRENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

UPON PRESENTATION AND SURRENDER OF THIS BANK GUARANTEE AT THE OFFICE OF PT. BANK
EKSPOR IMPOR INDONESIA (PERSERO), PLAZA EXIM BRANCH IL. JEND. GATOT SUBROTO
KAV. 36-38 JAKARTA-INDONESIA SUCH PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT SET OFF AND
CLEAR OFF ANY DEDUCTIONS OR CHARGES, FEES OR DEDUCTION OR WITHHOLDING OF ANY
NATURE NOW OR HEREAFTER IMPOSED OR LEVIED, COLLECTED, WITHHELD OR ASSESSED BY
THE GOVERNMENT OF REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR
AUTHORITY THEREOF THEREIN.

THIS GUARANTEE IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY
SECURITIES (1993 REVISION) INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, PUBLICATION NUMBER
ICC 500.

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
PT. BANK EKSPOR IMPOR (PERSERO)
   JAKARTA PLAZA EXIM BRANCH


           [SEAL]


/s/ ****             /s/ ****
-----------------    -----------------
      B.43.B              B.64.1



ENDORSEMENT BANK INDONESIA
           [SEAL]

/s/ ****
--------------------------
No. 00-6621.

#### Cooper *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of First Investors Financial Services, Inc., (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tommy A. Moore,Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)                                                                   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Act of 1934; and

(2)                                                                   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:Sept 13, 2007
|        | By: /s/ Tommy A. Moore, Jr. |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Tommy A. Moore, Jr.         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

----
#### John J. TIMMINS, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Mary Alice FIRESTONE, and Joseph D. Farish, Jr., Appellees.

No. 43437.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 25, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
254 La. 132

#### Lawrence E. JOHNSON v. Charles P. WILLS.

No. 49817.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Charles P. Wills applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 220 So.2d 134.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
r deaf and
lind, insane,

pauper, or}

?

_—-—

16

15

of Madd,

SCHEDULE I.—Free Tahabits itauts in Mira bias heh in the Counity of ep
- enumerated by me, on the Jol_ doy of Me [try 11850, ,

= may Les oe
— ee = Sys —
| ras r3 DEACRIPTION, : E | | $3
| is 5 +} The Name of every Perscn whose usual place ~ x6 g Profession, Occupation, or T'rade ns} Pract or Biatu. \F 3 gre Whether deaf and
| . < ® ' = ot @ 7 "= ea | ' > ; ; ; .
£ Le : & of abode on the Arst day of June, 1850, was £4: of each Male Person over 15 é Naming the State, Territory, 2 $2 at cumh, Ripe seat,
bo : 223 | a & <i 25 ee idiotic, pauper, or
leie ia y in this family. eC years of age. =e or Country. BesBi ss convict,
iges 8s¢ Bi 8.13 ae ERE? Ea
a € ia |. > =z <= F
1 f 5 6 | 7 8 | 9 1011 12 3
! hin tt (dil Zi
a wy, Ln lifes Uf ee * Mel F pl
2 fr:
—he ti z= —
Hb IGG A If Aelws é
DIE ATS Moot $0 am ___ Atlan, ee 7
i be f / G J, 7
v ca Kt A eS, 2 : Whttl do —__ 7
5 ¢ |
I UN 411€€ ZVE hy ki A tases ile

BA LL. id. tU W/L

i <7 a / Tie

7

7 by be

oe hot
tke

lbn Soe eee

i Sy ae

Miptilhi Ce Phin lia uo So

bebe eit

aaa LitA Gelhawens 8

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

10

12

i4

io

16

17

” 2 a Lil Lf WAL, zz a L/ as ae

/ wer A Va ju ie 5 Se ee ///) 2 7 oon A -

, ee Pers ti ee ee ss

ost _ eitath te £F4t ot 2 er. res > sah +e |

wh ae! _ Sunak . Me } | oh 2 he eS | - :

Mt ew Bary Gs, oo z hs

mt Ge — A, nae: IA yore Doise abd = (tft poet ND a = J

" She; “ LEA ’ | feelec4) _ | -_ 3Pe

: ae In Lito.) \7\ |

1% =  bofezr At | Z ps 7 put | fix __

ek a 3 teLL sk Pa ae aS - HSA AS

* ee Wb be biel: j hu ay, Sh een ed a ee VA Lichen Shek WAS :

sas] Aller. 2 _/ = 2 x od

a huihact = a Lb date | ees oe Graham |

“ re 4 A = G MH : of = _ Littht / oa pe

i ben wales te An en Soe) 28 Me

eee, ye _ ale oy Sek rN feth tvet-_ Poy a ae
ani / 0 Male. th. 2 ees Sa a oa water |. aera At =

| J
Exhibit 10(i)


SOUTH BOSTON SAVINGS BANK
460 West Broadway
South Boston, MA 02127-9109
Telephone (617) 268-2500
Fax (617) 269-5354

SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

South Boston Savings Bank, effective as of the date hereunder, hereby enters
into this severance agreement with Stephen P. McNulty, Vice President. The basic
terms and conditions will be as follows:

Period of Agreement: Two (2) years from the date hereunder or the effective date
of a change of control of Boston Bancorp/South Boston Savings Bank - whichever
is later.

Severance Payment: Two years' compensation, an amount computed as the arithmetic
average of the three (3) most recent calendar years' compensation paid by South
Boston Savings Bank to Mr. McNulty time (2) two.

Form of Payment: Lump sum immediately following a termination of employment of
Mr. McNulty.

Geographic Restrictions on Involuntary Relocation: In the event of a change of
control of Boston Bancorp/South Boston Savings Bank, an involuntary relocation
of Mr. McNulty beyond a 20 miles radius from 460 West Broadway, South Boston,
Massachusetts shall result in the payment of severance compensation as described
above.

Restriction on Reduction in Compensation: In the event of a change of control of
Boston Bancorp/South Boston Savings Bank, a reduction in the level of
compensation paid to Mr. McNulty after such change of control, as compared with
the level of compensation paid by South Boston Savings Bank to Mr. McNulty prior
to such change of control, shall result in the payment of severance compensation
as described above.

Agreed to this 1st day of June, 1995:

/s/ Stephen P. McNulty                 /s/ Peter H. Hersey
-------------------------              ------------------------------
Officer                                    Peter H. Hersey
                                           Chairman of the Board & Acting
                                           President & Chief Executive Officer

                                       /s/ Robert E. Lee
                                       ------------------------------
                                           Robert E. Lee
                                           Office of the Chairman, Director &
                                           Senior Vice President
2 oe

a J

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND LABOR~BUREAU OF THE CENSUS ( Supervisor's Distict No. /./ ' Sees

THIRTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1910,-POPULA rim leumunnpeneiL ae 2 LBs
c NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE / Sr ete = a ms Cy” Ww es : KAY 4 SiG Diiien X,
<== peey A non, wa city, 7 . ER, © me Hy. a rR C q:

<3 en eucwai t VES:

P NRGAYE OBOTHER. DINSION OF COUNTY Uses} prs Weak bal uaa 0 asses Rawal, tows, pola Sasa. abd, bas, as lemon) :
= ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE {SS pay oF — FAR ig
OCCUPATION. ERSERSEIY OF HOA.

nate

ee NAME OF INSTITUTION.

LOCATION. NAME RELATION. PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. NATIVITY, CTTIZESNEIP.

ars “Bet of cach person whose place of abode on April 15 a ens t bce lel won Place of birth of each person and parents of cach person reumerstet. If born in the Untied States, | gs |
1 Skee == iene ~~ give ibe state ar territory, if of fereige birth, give Ube coustry. =

1916, was iu this family. Seat childree. =
Helatlousatp of this per f “st : ——— c —

Koter sername first, them ibe xires mame and middle —
Initial, tf any. sou to the head of the

Inclade every person Wiring os April 15, 1010, Omit
ehildren bore since April 14, 1010,

tiuastt neces af lnstitutlon, if hoy, dud \odicate the hues om whi the exiriew ure Gade. Mew leitrictios|

|

i | Whether
Whether abje to epesk ; an x
Exellab; or, Ef not, | Trede or prefresics of, or | tieneral nature of industry, employer 65 bat | bee at
particular Lied ef werk healers, or establishmest ‘4 ~
tice language spokes. deur by thls persen, as ta whiek this perven works, emeteg tte or | waaks
spinner, saleaman, ta- Beotion mill.drygoeds | warking
terer, et. store, farm, ett. | saowa LA

i

iy

free or
mortgaged,

tle alnee
tember 1,

ae py neers

schedule.

write,

‘Suz

the Valonw or Confed.
erate Army or Navy.

ther of farm

oh merriag

or Alvarced.

Place of birth of thls Person. Place fore of Father of = Place sg ory ot of

road, ete,

(eed plead Une oh tara
RIPE Petia ark Soe Sree
rev Shi sian ed
me tyehd fea ewe sR fawn teme —ariers Al bora ah tn
4 mets
i fave

Onacd
| Whether « sartivor of

Howse wumber (la '
| Whether nataral-
| teed or allen
| Whether able to
Kileeded wehool
e | Qwaed of rented,
| Yarm ur bower,

elites or Lown), |
Age al last birth

day
Namber of yoarso
riage:

in order of vi
| Year of lumle
| then tothela
| ed Ntates.

hatloa.

wes
e

100

Whether
ow | married, widow
|

|

3

I
{

| derof steltation. |

Namber of famtty |

Number of dweth
om | tog boune In are

@ | Calor or race,

al
“hy | Ne
dl

;

{
f
|

>
Ly. , tired tiles IR ee
be]
ch
fe

a

5 pes avenue,
ino

‘

'

a UF. tn * ~

are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http:/www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

3
F yy
iy
AZ
2
A

belay A hk |
a Joi ct A |

4
5

ci

tort bed |
CZ i
Me tes Al 7 #2 ”
af } ti)

eS,

+ aA
as
FE é;
y sh az A Ay : : Gh ,
J f A. ~~ “?

"MA “Ce fea :

v

Lr

°P Ter A ;
aT ae : G ww ob
a PO in as 7 a bi
Ker LL.
#### TRAEGER BROTHERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. O. L. PANTON, d/b/a Ormond’s Import Company, Appellee.

No. 71-381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 15, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,952,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,952,504
<PP&E>                                       7,353,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,306,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,886
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,196,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,306,143
<SALES>                                      1,913,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,472,836
<CGS>                                          295,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  295,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               650,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,526,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,526,363
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,526,363
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   108.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   108.91
        

</TABLE>
#### Paul ERICKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-753.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 174 DB 202 2 (No. 26 RST 2023)

:

SEANNE N. MURRAY : Attorney Registration No. 67700

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : ( Delaware County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6 th day of April

, 202 3 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinar y Board Member dated March 26 , 202 3

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

SEANNE N. MURRAY

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, h as demonstrated

that s he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for

admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active

status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the

Board in th e investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
#### DELTA ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellant, v. McDEVITT & STREET COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-104.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 19, 1972.

Edward M. Waller, Jr., of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey, Kinney & Boggs, Tampa, for appellant.

Harrison, Greene, Mann, Davenport, Rowe & Stanton, St. Petersburg, for appel-lee.

MANN, Judge.

This case was prematurely terminated by summary judgment. Delta submitted to McDevitt & Street, a general contractor, a proposal for work as an electrical subcontractor on an apartment project. McDevitt & Street sent a letter to Delta enclosing a contract form. “If you find the enclosed in order,” they wrote, “please affix your signature and seal on Page 5 thereof and return all four copies to this office. .' . . As soon as the enclosed has been returned to us and processed, we will return an executed copy of the contract to you for your files.”

Whether this constituted an offer, which Delta accepted, or whether the contract was not to be regarded as complete until executed by both parties, is a question of fact not resolved by the depositions and affidavits on file. The trial judge apparently relied on the deposition of Delta’s president, who replied, “Certainly”, to the *227question: “At all times did you contemplate that both Delta Electrical and Me-Devitt & Street would sign a written con- , ,

A distinction must be drawn between the intention to memorialize in writing an existing and binding agreement and an intention that no agreement come into being until both parties have executed a signed document.1 The factual issue here is virtually the same as that in Housing Authority of Fort Pierce v. Foster,2 and should proceed as that case did.

Reversed and remanded.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.

1

. See Hinote v. Brigman, 1902, 44 Fla. 589, 83 So. 303; Ocala Cooperage Co. v. Florida Cooperage Co., 1910, 59 Fla. 390, 52 So. 13.

2

. Fla.App.4th 1970, 237 So.2d 569.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1556 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1556

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating 
   to the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health 
                            Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2013

  Mr. Brown (for himself, Mr. Begich, and Mr. Merkley) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating 
   to the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health 
                            Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON COLLECTIVE BARGAINING OF 
              EMPLOYEES OF THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION.

    Section 7422 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (c).
                                 <all>
```
#### Mortimer Norman KORAN v. STATE.

No. 38489.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 11, 1969.

219 Certiorari denied without opinion. So.2d 449.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-16-00383-CV

Style: In re International Agencies Co., Ltd., Relator

Date motion filed*: June 1, 2016

Type of motion: Unopposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File His Response to

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Party filing motions: Real Party in Interest Jon Malone, Court-Appointed Receiver

Document to be filed: Response to Petition

Is appeal accelerated? Yes (original proceeding).

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: June 2, 2016

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: June 2, 2016

Date Requested: June 15, 2016

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: June 15, 2016.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

  

Date: June 2, 2016
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joshua M. BURSH, II.

No. 61251.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1978.

In re: Joshua M. Bursh, II, applying for supervisory writ of certiorari, and motion to stay arraignment. Parish of Lincoln.

Denied.