alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 11, 2013

NO. 03-11-00640-CR

Alan Joseph Mury, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s 

judgment: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment 

of the trial court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and 

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified 

below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                   EXHIBIT 27

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet,  Statement  of  Operations,  Statement  of Cash  Flows and Notes  thereto
incorporated  in Part 1, Item 1, of this Form  10-QSB  and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                    <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                                 1,559,661
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          538,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            12,279,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       15,406,867
<PP&E>                                                 7,416,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (3,856,063)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         21,619,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  8,297,388
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               3,005
<OTHER-SE>                                             1,620,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           21,619,549
<SALES>                                                13,978,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       13,978,783
<CGS>                                                  8,180,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          8,180,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       6,047,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     349,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (360,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (360,034)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (360,034)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.11)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Shelter Properties VII Limited Partnership (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
#### Willie B. RICHARDSON v. STATE.

No. 36567.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 199 So.2d 770.
Page No. of ie ile

SCHEDULE 1—Free Inhabitants in = 2/72
of Lala enumerated by me, on the |.47%

 Descrerrion.

within the

bar.

Attended School
within the year.

: |
‘ ; “ ! ‘
The name of every persen whose usual | Sse | pion, old aa, or Trade of
place of abode on the first day of June, || ench on, | | Naming the State, Territory,
| | or Country.

dumb, blind, insane,
idiotic, paupér, or 4,

a

Dwelling-houses—
numbered in the
order of visitation.
Families numbered
in the order of
visitation.

| FS | Mord

mike 2-7 ae seen beat || i aealy ee
Cees CT aT

_Sninua D1 ‘
Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

a a oe |

, Nisit http://)www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
to | 290 \99h- J available records like the one shown here.

"

EET

ee seTy

cj eel ly iit fs Se aZ lll | | a Ze~
2 Ln Le t A | Zz Pall

is |

14 Diy ttpt a
15 D4 {42 J, oe UAC dal
16| / )

Lf ca €
| |
it CLA CL | g

iS
RSS}
YN INS RP
N\
ne

é
PEED eT
Rs ak tere

Se 3 a WA LU 4 :
Mat ’ Mh ied 2

>

‘
YS

S
N
uct
» Jo IK
vied fbb Th be

. B |,

\ S

M
|
j
I

No. white males, /f No. coloreé males, |__| No. foreign bora,
Le |] H |
No. white females, 2. 2-| No. colored females, aif) 3 era dumb,

:
i ;
-
A ‘
ia
ie. -
*
yee
|
‘i i
) |
’
;
o in .
n * 2 e
ye
i. .
va 5

oe

’
}
{
4 ]
; . i
‘
i d ‘
r ’ = ' ,
é oe - } . ; 3 ~ _ee ee * | aa j i
’ | i+ ia rte * be | Le. ) j r }

.

a a

- “f

-
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 145 (Friday, July 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16017]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Government-Owned Inventions; Available 
for Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DoN) announces the availability of 
the inventions listed below, assigned to the United States Government, 
as represented by the Secretary of the Navy, for domestic and foreign 
licensing by the Department of the Navy.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed 
to Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg. 2, 300 
Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface 
Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg. 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, 
IN 47522-5001, Email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#de9db6acb7adaab1aeb6bbacf093b1b0adbba79eb0bfa8a7f0b3b7b2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87c4eff5eef4f3e8f7efe2f5a9cae8e9f4e2fec7e9e6f1fea9eaeeeb">[email protected]</span></a>, 812-854-2777.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following patents are available for 
licensing: Patent No. 9,987,996 (Navy Case No. 200223): VEHICLE WITH AT 
LEAST ONE MULTIPURPOSE EQUIPMENT ITEM MOUNTED ON A WINCH AND ASSOCIATED 
METHODS OF USE//Patent No. 10,001,417 (Navy Case No. 2001416): ADAPTIVE 
HEAT FLOW CALORIMETER//and Patent No. 10,006,770 (Navy Case No. 
200402): REMOTE LOCATION DETERMINATION SYSTEM.

    Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

    Dated: July 23, 2018.
James Edward Mosimann III,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-16017 Filed 7-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Carol Ann JACOBS, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Woodrow Bernard Jacobs, Petitioner, v. SIMS CRANE SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation, Respondent.

No. 43868.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 3, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 491.

ADICINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Preferred Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 13, 2004                       /s/ Bradley E. Barks
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Bradley E. Barks
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                        1
“Tung flag it lilaue"

N\\

GOEulet

N

£NNN &\\ \ N\

£NN\\ £|G|AINQ £A\|\\ O. && S £WN R \\ $ £

££

'' # N

ŠSIFA $

NN \\

£

\

£

\

N'§

N

RN

§

§

|

|

N

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
THE AMERICAN MARINE ENGINEER 9

 

The S. S. "Mielero"

THE "MIELERO."

An indication of the feverish demand for freight steamers is_ found in the fact that although the large

steel tankiship “Mielero”, built by the Fore River

Shipbuilding Corporation for the Cuba Distilling

Company, of New York, was launched less than a

monthibefore, she left the Fore River yards on Feb.

17th, to go immediately into commission.

The§Mielero, the third of a fleet of these tankers

built by the Fore River Shipbuilding Corporation for

the Cuba Distilling Company, is designed to carry

molasses in bulk north and petroleum in bulk south,

without renovating her tanks. She has a carrying

capacity of about 1,500,000 gallons of molasses and

about 2,250,000 gallons of oil, the cargo deadweight

being a little over 1,000 tons. Her length between

perpendiculars is 389 feet and she is propelled by a

vertical triple expansion engine.

MASSACHUSETTS NAUTICAL SCHOOL.

The annual report of the commissioners of the

Massacuhsetts Nautical School, of which Capt. P. W.

Hourigan, U. S. N., is superintendent and command

er, dated January 1st, 1917, shows thatthe school

has made highly satisfactory progress. ,,-_The course

of instruction given is to. prepare young men for ser

vice as deck and engineer officers in the merchant

marine. The instruction is carried out on board the

U.;S. S. Ranger, a steam sloop-of-war, loaned to the

Commonwealth by the United States Navy Depart

ment. We make the following extracts from the re

port:

During the year there have been 175 students on

the rolls of the school, the sons of citizens of Mass

achusetts. They came from seventy-four cities and

towns of the state, and their previous education was

as follows: High school, 144; academies, 8; technical

schools and business colleges, 4; grammar schools, 19.

The average age of cadets at entrance was’ seventeen

years. There have been graduated thirty-eight

cadets, sixteen in the spring and twenty-two in the

autumn. The number of cadets enrolled in the

school at present is 100. The demand of the mer

chant marine for the services of the graduates is

much greater than the supply. So far as our records

show, about seventy-five per cent. of the 761 grad

uates of the school are serving in, or in connection

with, the merchant marine. In recent years the pro

portion entering the merchant service has continued

to increase.

The most desirable‘ improvement of the nautical

school which is in the power of the state to provide

would be a permanent berth for the schoolship prop

erty, so located that a building would be available

having study and exercise rooms. If the school had

a permanent berth on property which it could police,

excluding undesirable visitors and giving suflicient

play and drill grounds for the cadets, and school and

exercise rooms, the health of the school could be

maintained with greater assurance and the instruction

given with greater efliciency.
#### Martin KLEINBARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 12, 1968.

*128Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Marvin J. Emory, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of (1) possession of barbiturates and (2) using a false address to obtain barbiturates contrary to the provisions of § 404.02, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. The appellant presents two points. The first urges that the State failed to establish a primia facie case because it did not prove affirmatively that appellant obtained the drugs with criminal intent. Without deciding-the question of whether this particular statute requires scienter as a necessary element of the crime [see Coleman v. State ex rel. Jackson, 140 Fla. 772, 193 So. 84 (1940)], we hold that the evidence showed the giving of a false address where appellant did not live and never had lived and this, along with other testimony, established that the appellant knowingly gave a false address.

Appellant’s second point urges that he was denied the right of closing argument. This position has been repeatedly dealt with by the courts of this State who have held that unless the appellant requests closing argument, or objects to its omission, no error is shown. Willoughby v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 10, cf. State v. Jones, Fla.1967, 204 So.2d 515.

Affirmed.
Page No, Eleventh Census of the United States.

Supervisor's District No, 9 7 _ 1 . prchets
Enumeration District No. r ee <4. SPECIAL SCHEDULE.
SURVIVING SOLDIERS, SAILORS, AND MARINES, AND WIDOWS, ETO,

Persons who served in the Army, Navy, and Marine Oorps of the United States during the war of the rebellion (who are survivors), and

| widows of such persons, in [title | Oounty of __-Lee fart te

Stateof_ -_ “Haevaehieracte ____, enumerated in June, 1890. 6 f, 2 Y hte

———= = =: = = = =

Mamas ov SuRvivina Sovprens, SatLors, amd
f Mannings, anp Wipows. *| Regiment or Vessel.

6 ; 7

J}
IN1G

= |1865| =

rladéioa 2 sesal foe

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration, a
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

' Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

| Byres ep tie

4h | = |sv al te

11 to el

en SLO
sel

3] | poy Matto pot ole
34F altro Mal Hates:

at] 36S
259 La. 901

#### CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CORP. et al. v. LOUISIANA TAX COMMISSION et al.

No. 51783.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1971.

In re: The Louisiana Tax Commission, et al. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 251 So.2d 482.

Application denied; on the showing made, there is no error in the judgment of the court of appeal.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. HE R I B E R T O V AL E NC I A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 10266 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 8 -cr-0 1 4 0 8 -F JM

ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona F r e de r i c k J . M art one , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t23, 2010 ** B e f o r e : L E A V Y , H A W K I N S , an dT H O M A S , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . H e r i be rt o V a l e nc i aappe a l s f r om the 37- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng h i s g u i l ty - p l e ac o n v i c t i o n f o rr e e n trya f

t e rd e p o rt a t i o n , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. V a le n c iac o n te n d s th a t h is ab o v e - g u id e lin e s s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e ly 

# FI LED SEP 07 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 10266 2 unr e a s onabl e gi ve n hi s ba c kgr ound and c r i m i na l r e c or d. T he r e c or d r e f l e c t s the d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t p r o c e du r a llye rr , an dth e s e n te n c e im p o s e dis s ub s tan tiv e ly r e a s o n ab le u n d e rth e to ta lityo f th e c ir c u m s tan c e s . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 5 1 ( 2 0 0 7 ) ; U n ite d Sta tes v . Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d 984, 993 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( e n b a n c ) . F urthe r , c ontr a ryt o V a l e nc i a ’ s c ont e nt i on, the pr os pe c t i ve a m e ndm e ntt o the s e n te n c in g g u id e lin e s d o e s n o t a s s is t h is c a s e . See U . S . S . G . § 2L 1. 2. AF F I RME D.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947986

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          3,846,273
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 131,353,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                       75,000
<INVENTORY>                                       173,920
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 92,903,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                        14,368,899
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     27,041,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   92,903,706
<SALES>                                         1,558,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,558,019
<CGS>                                             311,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  546,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                574,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      125,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.40
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Miguel De Freitas, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[734 NYS2d 745]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the possession of narcotics. According to the unusual incident report, petitioner was the addressee of a package that contained 93 grams of marihuana secreted in a soup can. This discovery gave rise to a search of petitioner’s cell where correction officers found two hand-rolled marihuana cigarettes and 3.5 grams of loose marihuana. Petitioner was observing the cell search when the marihuana cigarettes were found; however, he was not present for the remainder of the search, having been taken for questioning by State Police about the marihuana that had come in the mail.

The evidence presented at petitioner’s disciplinary hearing included the unusual incident report, the misbehavior report and the testimony given by the correction officer who authored the report after he had conducted the search of petitioner’s *627cell. Also in evidence were the results of the laboratory tests that were positive for the presence of marihuana. This was sufficient to constitute the requisite substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt of the charged misconduct *(see, Matter of Rosario v Selsky,*266 AD2d 656; *Matter of Parker v Laundree,*234 AD2d 727).

Petitioner contends that the determination must be annulled because he was not present throughout the entire search of his cell. While it is true that under certain circumstances, the failure to permit an inmate to observe a cell search will require the dismissal of any resulting disciplinary charges *(see, Matter of Gonzalez v Wronski,*247 AD2d 767; *Matter of Llull v Coombe,*238 AD2d 761, 762, *lv denied*90 NY2d 804), this did not occur in the matter under review. Petitioner observed the first part of the cell frisk and was present at the time when the two marihuana cigarettes were found; hence, as to this contraband, his right to be present was not violated and the charge of drug possession is sustainable. Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his assertion of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.