alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Linda Ruth OLDAKER, Appellant, v. Larry Dale OLDAKER, Appellee.

No. Q-254.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 25, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 22, 1972.

Norton Josephson, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

John E. Hankal, of Coble, Stewart & McKinnon, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which provided that temporary custody of the minor child should be split for alternating three month periods and that no award for child support to either parent would presently be made.

Both parties challenge the split custody arrangement and appellant takes issue with the provision denying child support payments to her.

We have carefully reviewed the record herein and affirm that part of the judgment below which awarded temporary custody to the parents for alternating three month periods. A reviewing court will not substitute its judgment for that of the chancellor where the evidence presented to the chancellor sustains his findings. In view of the child’s tender age of three, we do not feel that such an arrangement is against the child’s best interest or welfare and, at this time, we find no objection to the chancellor’s attempt to be fair to both parents. Perhaps a different arrangement will be necessitated when the child reaches school age, but this is a matter for the lower court’s discretion when that time arrives.

As to the matter of child support payments, we are of the opinion that some award of payments to appellant should have been provided. The record supports only one conclusion — that appellant would hardly be able to support her minor child without some aid from appellee. We therefore remand this cause to the trial court for a consideration of the amount to be awarded appellant in child support payments during that period of time in which appellant has custody of the child. While we do not presume to interfere with the trial court’s dis*251cretion as to the amount of child support payments to be awarded, we do note that the parties herein had previously agreed upon an amount of $22.50 per week, and we simply bring this fact out for the trial court’s consideration.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.
Exhibit 11

                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

NET LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss per share is calculated as follows:
(in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                        MARCH 31,
                                                                        -------------------------------------
                                                                              2000                1999
                                                                        -----------------   -----------------
<S>                                                                     <C>                 <C>
Net loss                                                                        $ (2,464)           $ (3,602)
                                                                        =================   =================

BASIC:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding                                   10,107               9,956
                                                                        =================   =================

     Net loss per common share                                                   $ (0.24)            $ (0.36)
                                                                        =================   =================

DILUTED:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding                                   10,107               9,956
     Effect of dilutive securities:
         Convertible notes                                                             -                   -
         Stock options                                                                 -                   -
         Warrants                                                                      -                   -
                                                                        -----------------   -----------------
     Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares outstanding                                            10,107               9,956
                                                                        =================   =================

     Net loss per common and common
         equivalent share                                                        $ (0.24)            $ (0.36)
                                                                        =================   =================
</TABLE>
#### Walter Gilbert FULLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1344.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 27, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
261 La. 826

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Thomas IRWIN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52399.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 1972.

In re: Thomas Irwin applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
DERCRIPTION.

616

ear.

: Whether deaf land

dumb, blind, insane,
idiotic, pauper, or
| convict.

The Name of every Perscn whose usual place Piace or Birra.

Profession, Occupation, or’ ‘Trade

White,

of each:Male Person over 15 |

miulatto,|

blavk, or]

; |
of abode on the first day of June, 1850, was | Naming the State, Territory,

in this family. years of age. or Country.

order of visitation. it

in the order of |

visitation.

numbered in the
within they

Persons over 20 y'ra of age

who cannot read & write,

Families numbered
owned.

Value of Real Estate |i
Married within the

Dwelling-houses
Osler}

|
ws | Attended School

a
3

wy Sa in oT ;
oe a a vS ei | xO

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

a we, —

Uh ay
¢ A#2 by a Dy Ja od
oon Cla te ti WA ra AP vp sf

AL, A hisses )

Llane
tChhbe SOB a a C624

ented eee hE

So ee a oe
LLL ee ae
elas PLS

he AE

a

4b ns a I wae cel

—

Baer LL La

ees ee,
BL fA a Hitikcaee).
PST eS Ie
°/ AP at  Piflrive 2D |

"ETN Maas FD le ee
g e -
cour

oer crc reo e Teer netronre nace

a __ Mae Ge wsrrunon Alaa eng 3 LFasoa Sa : | ewutrceo or we on te oy op Deere
gee 2 ee A ee en
— fAE even] EM | ae fll EaaEs cca
ra: TDinsLa. Base
5 ig asf 4
so a
om pate
Lge [ee peval “161
é- SSS a
ee ee
; Bes Eas
Fa OF raat
bd z ape cae
Biglad alive vi FANAUA SD
pd z ZX ie
arms fe
2. Fal
ze : be
pial Sadia | attgata IOP 72
file oI a
Bape epee
EAL us
7 2
# id (rarare
sole 2¢ bala: he
, 3
bebacla
fe fr | eee
mA Lee
Ta z Va par EL ee r=? zz lel a t
|= _ historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau
Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here. aee aa
ae,
ia Za aaa Vidic iGate \iaith Grdiial Wh | Boag ba
y ATA IEL ae a SoZ
Z,
, ra :
i ie Zs

Bett)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>           5

<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-3
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000759726
<NAME>              P-B/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-3
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1996

<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-30-1995

<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          1,139,947

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                9,250

<PP&E>                          10,772,457

<DEPRECIATION>                  136,271

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  11,921,654

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,276,428

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      10,645,226

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    11,921,654

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,052,890

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,684,759

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              29,497

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 338,634

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    338,634

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   5.64

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORTION 

. DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0864 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR DECISION · 

The Court has reviewed Respondent's Motion To Extend Time to Answer Complainant's Motion 

for Decision. 

IT BE AND IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted. Federal Express Corporation is 

granted additional time within which to respond to the Motion until May I, 2015. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 
. '· 

SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2 W 1 000 1 

Greg Stofko, Respondent 's Counsel 

1700 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Suite 950 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

TEL: 202-393-9285 

FAX: 202-628-0654 

EMAIL: greg.stofko@fedex.com 

James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

2601 Meacham Boulevard 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5074 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant. 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-0864 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W .. Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
igpk_ex103.htm

  EXHIBIT 10.3
  
 Promissory Note
  
  
 	 Date: 
	  
	 October 3, 2022

	  
	  
	  

	 Borrower:
	  
	 Integrated Holding Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”)

	  
	  
	  

	 Principal Amount:
	  
	 $250,000

	  
	  
	  

	 Lender:
	  
	 Eugene Caiazzo

	  
	  
	  

	 Borrower’s Mailing Address:
	  
	 6810 N. State Road 7, Coconut Creek, Fl. 33073

	  
	  
	  

	 Lender’s Mailing Address:
	  
	 1300 N. Florida Mango Road, Suite 30, West Palm, Beach, Florida 33409

	  
	  
	  

	 Method of Payment:
	  
	 Payment will be made by direct deposit into Borrower’s account

	  
	  
	  

	 Annual Interest Rate:
	  
	 7.5%

	  
	  
	  

	 Maturity Date:
	  
	 April 3, 2023

	  
	  
	  

	 Annual Interest Rate on
	  
	  

	 Matured
	  
	  

	 Unpaid Amounts:
	  
	 15%



 
 
  
   
 Consideration In the
 Event of Default                                         
  
  
 	 1.
	 Terms of Payment (principal and interest): The Principal Amount and accrued interest are due and payable no later than the Maturity Date. Payments will be applied to accrued interest and the remainder to the reduction of the Principal Amount.

	  
	  

	 2.
	 Borrower promises to pay to the order of Lender the Principal Amount plus interest at the Annual Interest Rate. This Note is payable to Lender by the Method of Payment and according to the Terms of Payment. All unpaid amounts are due by the Maturity Date. After maturity, Borrower promises to pay any unpaid principal balance plus interest at the 15% Annual Interest Rate on Matured, Unpaid Amounts.

	  
	  

	 3.
	 Arbitration of Claims. The Parties consent to any dispute resolution between the Parties in accordance dance with and under the auspices and rules of the American Arbitration Association (the “Arbitration Service”), including any claim that the Borrower defaults in the payment of the Note. The arbitration shall take place in Coconut Creek, Florida, unless the Parties agree to conduct the arbitration in a different location. The arbitrator’s award shall be enforceable in any court having jurisdiction thereof



 
 
  
 
  
 	 
	 1

	

	 


 
 
  
 
  
 	 BORROWER:
	  

	  
	  

	 Integrated Holding Solutions, Inc. 
	  

	  
	  

	 /s/ Matthew Dwyer 
	  

	 By:  Matthew Dwyer, Chief Executive Officer 
	  

	  
	  

	 LENDER:
	  

	  
	  

	 EUGENE CAIAZZO 
	  

	  
	  

	 /s/ Eugene Caiazzo 
	  

	 By Eugene Caiazzo 
	  



 
 
  
 
  
 	 
	 2
#### Arthur Hazen PETIT, Petitioner, v. Louis L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 73-567.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**Certification**

I, Tommy A. Moore, Jr.,certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-Q of First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc.

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The Company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and based on such evaluation:

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport (based on such evaluation); and

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: Sept 11, 2006 |                         |
|---------------------|------------------------------|
|                |                         |
|                | By: /s/ TOMMY A.  MOORE, JR. |   |
|                | Tommy A. Moore,  Jr.         |
|                | Chief Executive  Officer     |

 

----
#### Ance KING, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-78.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### FLORIDIAN PEST CONTROL, Petitioner, v. W. E. MORRIS ROOFING CO. et al., Respondents.

No. 40332.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 4, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Manuel RODRIGUEZ, Respondent.

No. 42608.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 29, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 263 So.2d 267.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Barrick Gold Corporation (the Company), and to the incorporation by
reference on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-121500, 333-131715, 333-135769) of the Company, of our report dated February 18, 2015 relating to the Companys 2014 and 2013 consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as at December 31, 2014.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP                                 
|Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
|Toronto, Ontario                                               
|March 27, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Birner Dental
Management Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby
certify, pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350), that to his knowledge:


1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                            Date:    August  14,  2006


                              By:    /s/  Frederic  W.J.  Birner
                                     ---------------------------
                            Name:    Frederic  W.J.  Birner
                           Title:    Chief  Executive  Officer


                              By:    /s/  Dennis  N.  Genty
                                     ----------------------
                            Name:    Dennis  N.  Genty
                           Title:    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
        Andrew
        A. Farina, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”),
        certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1) the
        Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
        June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
        (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
 
 (2) the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
        September 26, 2007
 
 /s/  ANDREW
                  A. FARINAAndrew
                  A. Farina,Principal
                  Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Birner Dental Management
Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:








1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:May
13, 2008








By:     
  /s/
Frederic W.J. Birner


Name: 
  Frederic W.J. Birner


Title:     
Chief Executive Officer








By:       
 /s/ Dennis N.
Genty


Name:    Dennis
N. Genty


Title:      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.1


 


RMR Mortgage Trust


 


Summary of Trustee Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation
of the Trustees of RMR Mortgage Trust (the “Company”) for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification
at any time by the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board, as applicable:


 


		·	Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $30,000 for services as a Trustee. The annual fee for any new Independent
Trustee is prorated for the initial year.



 


		·	Each Independent Trustee who serves as a committee chair of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating
and Governance Committee receives an additional annual fee of $7,500, $5,000 and $5,000, respectively. The committee chair fee
for any new committee chair is prorated for the initial year.



 


		·	The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and
for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Luanne MILLER, Relator, v. Jack SANDSTROM, Director, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Dade County, Florida, and Paul Murchek, Director, Florida Parole and Probation Commission, Respondents.

No. 74-151.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 1, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus dismissed.