alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-  HIPAA for Professionals 
-  Regulatory Initiatives 
-  Privacy      -  Summary of the Privacy Rule 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Combined Text of All Rules 
  -  HIPAA Related Links 
-  Security      -  Summary of the Security Rule 
  -  Security Guidance  
  -  Cyber Security Guidance 
-  Breach Notification      -  Breach Reporting 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  Regulation History 
-  Compliance & Enforcement      -  Enforcement Rule 
  -  Enforcement Process 
  -  Enforcement Data 
  -  Resolution Agreements 
  -  Case Examples 
  -  Audit 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  State Attorneys General 
-  Special Topics      -  HIPAA and Part 2 
  -  Change Healthcare Cybersecurity Incident FAQs 
  -  HIPAA and COVID-19 
  -  HIPAA and Reproductive Health        -  HIPAA and Final Rule Notice 
  -  HIPAA and Telehealth 
  -  HIPAA and FERPA 
  -  Research 
  -  Public Health 
  -  Emergency Response 
  -  Health Information Technology 
  -  Health Apps 
-  Patient Safety      -  Statute & Rule        -  PSQIA Statute 
    -  Patient Safety Rule 
  -  Enforcement 
  -  Guidance 
-  Covered Entities & Business Associates      -  Business Associate Contracts 
  -  Business Associates 
-  Training & Resources 
-  FAQs for Professionals 
-  Other Administrative Simplification Rules 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# Orthopedic Clinic Pays $1.5 Million to Settle Systemic Noncompliance with HIPAA Rules

Athens Orthopedic Clinic PA ("Athens Orthopedic") has agreed to pay $1,500,000 to the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and to adopt a corrective action plan to settle potential violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy and Security Rules. Athens Orthopedic is located in Georgia and provides orthopedic services to approximately 138,000 patients annually.
                          - Read the HHS Press Release
                          - Read the Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan *

* People using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, contact the HHS Office for Civil Rights at (800) 368-1019, TDD toll-free: (800) 537-7697, or by emailing OCRMail@hhs.gov.

Content last reviewed September 21, 2020
Exhibit
10.8


 


LOAN
EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


This
Loan Extension Agreement (the “Extension Agreement”) is dated as of this February 2, 2021, by and between Mr.
Yat-Gai Au (“the Lender”) and Regencell Bioscience Limited (“the Borrower”).


 


Terms
not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the loan agreement entered into between the Lender
and the Borrower on November 10, 2020 (the “Loan Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Lender agrees to make the Loan available to the Borrower in a timely manner or make payments on the Borrower’s behalf,
according to the needs of the operations and research activities of the Borrower and its subsidiaries or parent company;


 


WHEREAS,
the Maturity Date of the Loan and Existing Loan is June 30, 2021 and is subject to indefinite extension if agreed by the Parties
in writing.


 


NOW,
the Lender and the Borrower agree as follows:


 


1.
According to the needs of the operations and research activities of the Borrower and its subsidiaries and parent company for the
period from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, the Lender agrees to provide up to US$3 million in the form of Loan or make payments
on the Borrower’s behalf during the period from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022. This US$3 million amount can be adjusted
based on the needs of the operations and research activities of the Borrower and its subsidiaries and parent company and agreed
by both Parties in writing.


 


2.
The Maturity Date of the Loan and Existing Loan shall be extended from June 30, 2021 to December 31, 2022 and is subject to indefinite
extension by the Parties in writing.


 


3.
Except as specifically amended hereby, the parties hereto acknowledge and confirm that the Loan Agreement remain in full force
and effect and enforceable in accordance with their terms.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be signed by their duly authorized
officers.


  


Dated:
February 2, 2021


 


	The
    Lender	 	The
    Borrower
	 

        /s/
        Yat-Gai Au
	 	  

        /s/
        Yat-Gai Au

	Mr.
    Yat-Gai Au	 	Authorized
    Signer: Yat-Gai Au
	 	 	Title:
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
252 La. 117

#### QUINN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc. v. Maurice J. SAVOIE, Anthony G. Orgeron and William M. Justice, Jr., Clerk of Court for the Parish of Jefferson.

No. 49200.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1968.

In re: Maurice j. Savoie et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 207 So.2d 229.

Writ refused. The judgment .is not final.
EXHIBIT 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Martyn A. Powell, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Missouri River and Gold Gem Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:  February 12, 2003

/s/Martyn  A. Powell

Martyn A. Powell

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### James H. BLACK and Patricia Ann Black, his wife, Appellants, v. Robert B. CLIFTON and Phyllis K. Clifton, his wife, Appellees.

No. 73-106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 2, 1973.

*466Charles M. Rieders, of Vocelle, Harris & Rieders, Merritt Island, for appellants.

John Minot, of Shepard, Shepard & Minot, Cocoa, for appellees.

WALDEN, Judge.

This is a specific performance problem. It arose out of a written contract to sell real estate. The problem-causing provision found therein was “Seller convenants and warrants, (1) that there is ingress and egress to said property over public roads; . . ."

It developed that the defendants-sellers did not own and could not deliver such public road access and same was available, at best, only by private easement. Regardless, with this back drop, the purchasers under the contract, as plaintiffs, sued the sellers for specific performance. Specific performance was denied. Purchasers appeal. We reverse.

The implicit and underlying dis-positive question has to do with the right belonging to the vendee to compel vendor to perform his contract to the extent of his ability. See generally 29A Fla.Jur., Specific Performance § 83 et seq. Where a seller can not convey all of the lands he contracted to convey or where the quality of his title does not meet the contract standard and can not be remedied, nevertheless the buyer is entitled to specific performance of the contract for as much of the property as the vendor can convey or of the quality of title that he possesses, subject to an abatement in the purchase price because of such default or deficiency. Rose v. Henderson, Fla.1912, 63 Fla. 564, 59 So. 138; Brown v. Griffin, Fla.1954, 75 So.2d 781. The contract in question was complete, clear and unambiguous on its face and was not a proper subject for the admission of parol evidence to explain or vary it. Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 565.

In short the purchasers here, having chosen to accept the fact that there was no ingress or egress to the property over public roads, were entitled to specific performance and conveyance of the property to them with an appropriate abatement in the purchase price because of this deficiency and the fact that the property was only reachable by easement. Rose v. Henderson, supra; Brown v. Griffin, supra; Presley v. Worthington, Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 714. The sellers should not be heard to deny their contract and to escape performance by reason of their own deficiency and inability to perform as they promised. Triplett v. Brevard Properties, Inc., Fla.1927, 94 Fla. 869, 115 So. 534.

The appealed judgment is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

OWEN, C. J. and MAGER, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                           6,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                       705
<INVENTORY>                                     96,313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,870
<PP&E>                                       1,214,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                 545,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 959,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,539
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,760
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,132)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   959,496
<SALES>                                        704,481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               704,481
<CGS>                                          638,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  638,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   929
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,421)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,953)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,468)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)
        

</TABLE>
i

S, "6 ee
Page No ha ) or Inquiries numbered 7, 16, and 17, are not to be saked in respect to fufants,’ ‘Inquiries numbered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17; 19, and 20 are to be SS!
wie eas y a aa ae aan

ScnepuLe 1.—Inhabitants in, & LP Geen , in the Oouiity of rea oy , State
: : { 7

/ 2
of =F Azone zetp , enumerated by me on the LAr day of _ Le i¢72c_, 1870.

Post Office: / 4-Cf, | C20 : ; wees EAS a 7) €2_, Asst Marshal.

oa

|

Families, numbered In the order

F EDUCA- COXSTITUTION AL
im | TION, RELATIONS.

oa

a Saar
VALUE OF Real Estate
OWNED.

| If married within the year, state.

—

Whether deaf
and dumb,
blind, insane,
or idiotic.

numbered in
year, state

ul month (Jan., Feb., &o.)

5. 8.

Minle Citizens of L

Place of Birth, naming State
or Territory of U. 8.; or the
Country, it of foreign birth.

Profession, Occupation,
or Trade of each person,
male or female,

The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

— —_—_—

|

ae

right to vote is

ry ber

of visitation,

Females (F.)
Color — White ( W.), Black

—-—

the order of visitation.
Je Citizens of U. 8. of 21
yenrs of age and upwards,

hose

other grounds theo re-
bellion_ar other crime,

month (Jan., Feb., &c.)
21 years of age and u

wards,
denied or- abridged

[ Attended school within the
w

nese (C.), Indian (I)

| Father of furgign birth.
Motber of foreign birth

Age at last birthday, If
(B.), Mulatto (M.), Chi- $

Dwelling-houses,
ander |
Cannot read.
Cannot write

In fract

—

QD | Value of Real Estate.
© | Value of Persuna) Estate.
tact | If born within the

as
=m
ey
to

ww
t
jane
aF |-
2 |

|

—

a

|

4 Sia YE 4 2k aloakae ee Pe MW Ba PRY Gal
Je _ ¢ | , eo
 Hegacrg fMbeceuy C |; “| ALE. a few

, + .
EEC APS H PHligs ‘diss 4 /

en .  —-  °) a -  ~ e  *)

PU feted. Mccle#-

—

= WE c. LL: 7? ‘ / e /
=
56.3 6: inne: C See . A fy , FLIP PEE
13) ah. pigs 9 ee ZS\ Z| 4 Zz VELA LA : CEL LS we

—— —_ —

Bf Sficii. Rites: Le: : W/a Durant > cL0 “ =

)

——

-

MINININES

$-

the vA w, fei . 2 y }, ec 2 eG i
/

}
J

i ), ; , en ‘) - of
| — CLA) Les a, All J A = CLL Ls Pe se —s . SA LAZCL Le ee

Z xD, pe ; A 6 ~ ; & : < 29 2 een if {|

a ne

PA ‘ _/ if
Ms? -— s 15 - 3 ) :
Zaz: gale © rage se 2a 3 f | LL at

Sci

|
|

te
>

€ ck Chapt AL jos f z GIES os re
} -
7 4 “a | 2 ——,
EA Lis mnt LS A a I ; Ee,
> 2 7
Bee (Z c Ae chacd |G)? XG Oe or LO tS etd Ce PONE.

=
A oS: if,

w
_

it A yerernns on eee a

|

foe pe it =.

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

ured bake. * Whee

‘,

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

——

ROT SENDS

Ath, ae i
{aoe 22 heer ee £ :

Lie ever leh (2

STN SSK TN

|

SPS

i

ae NINN oN

No. of dwellings, 7d { yNo. of white females, (5 No. of males, foreign born, 43
“ “ families, “ke colored males, f ee et females; sé a“ A
co 4 white males, 2 j se Ot “ females, “a & blind,
#### Howard Virgil Lee DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-482.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 26, 1968.

Lee R. Horton, Jr., Public Defender, and J. Michael McCarthy, Special Asst. Public Defender, Lakeland, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant appeals from the denial of post-conviction relief sought by way of a petition under CrPR 1.850, 33 F. S.A.

Shortly after defendant was arrested for forging an endorsement, he was declared insolvent and given the assistance of the Public Defender. Defendant thereafter filed a “Motion for Reappointment of Counsel, giving no reason for the request, but demanding the right to have two specifically named attorneys appointed to represent him. The motion was denied, and defendant, assisted by the Public Defender, entered a plea of guilty to the charge of forgery. After being adjudicated guilty and sentenced, defendant moved pursuant to CrPR 1.850 for post-cónviction relief. The motion was denied and this appeal followed.

The sole issue to be resolved is whether the defendant was entitled to appointment of counsel of his own choice. The Florida courts have consistently held that the criminally accused have no such right, and we feel bound by the reason and logic of these cases. Diehl v. State, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 240; Brooks v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 876; Donald v. State, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 453; Wilder v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 395. Therefore, the order denying post-conviction relief is affirmed.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10(F)
 Customer No.Loan No.
 RBC BANK (USA)
 AMENDMENT TO $17,000,000 COMMERCIAL PROMISSORY NOTE: C & I
 VIDEO DISPLAY CORPORATION LEXEL IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC. FOX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., INC. Z-AXIS,
INC. TELTRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AYDIN DISPLAYS, INC. RBC BANK (USA)
 W I T N E S S E T H :
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 NOW THEREFORE
 ARTICLE 1.  Amendments to Promissory Note
 Section 1.1 Amendment
 Payment Terms




---



##### 



Section 1.2 Entire Agreement; No Novation or Release
 Section 1.3 Choice of Law; Successors and Assigns




---



##### 



BORROWER:VIDEO DISPLAY CORPORATION
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]LEXEL IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]FOX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]Z-AXIS, INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]TELTRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]AYDIN DISPLAYS, INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]BANK:




---



##### 



RBC BANK (USA)By:Name:Title:
  RONALD D. ORDWAY




---



##### 



Customer No.Loan No.
 RBC BANK (USA)
 AMENDMENT TO $3,500,000 COMMERCIAL PROMISSORY NOTE: C & I
 VIDEO DISPLAY CORPORATION LEXEL IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC. FOX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., INC. Z-AXIS,
INC. TELTRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AYDIN DISPLAYS, INC. RBC BANK (USA)
 W I T N E S S E T H :
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 NOW THEREFORE
 ARTICLE 1.  Amendments to Secondary Promissory Note
 Section 1.1 Amendment




---



##### 



Payment Terms
 Section 1.2 Entire Agreement; No Novation or Release
 Section 1.3 Choice of Law; Successors and Assigns




---



##### 



BORROWER:VIDEO DISPLAY CORPORATION
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]LEXEL IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]FOX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]Z-AXIS, INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]TELTRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]AYDIN DISPLAYS, INC.
    
    Attest:By:Ronald D. Ordway, its CEO
    
    Gregory L. Osborn, CFO[SEAL]BANK:




---



##### 



RBC BANK (USA)By:Name:Title:
  RONALD D. ORDWAY
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                           <C>
Name of Subsidiary:.......................... ICOS Systems GmbH
Jurisdiction of Organization:................ Germany
Name Under Which Doing Business.............. ICOS Systems Computer Vertriebs
                                              GmbH

Name of Subsidiary:.......................... IKOS Systems, Ltd.
Jurisdiction of Organization:................ United Kingdom
Name Under Which Doing Business.............. IKOS Systems, Limited

Name of Subsidiary:.......................... IKOS Systems K.K.
Jurisdiction of Organization:................ Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa
Name Under Which Doing Business.............. IKOS Systems Kabushiki Kaisha

Name of Subsidiary:.......................... Virtual Machine Works, Inc.
Jurisdiction of Organization:................ Delaware
Name Under Which Doing Business.............. Virtual Machine Works, Inc.
</TABLE>
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

37 38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/16 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 3.1.1.1

CERTIFICATE OF DECREASE
OF THE
SERIES A PREFERENCE STOCK
OF

PICTURETEL CORPORATION
Pursuant to Section 151(g) of the
Delaware General Corporations Law

Reference is made to the Certificate Of Designation, Preferences And Other
Rights of the Series A Preference Stock (The Series A Certificate of
Designation) of PictureTel Corporation, a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware (the Corporation), which certificate
was dated February 15, 1999 and was duly filed with the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware on February 16, 1999.

PictureTel Corporation hereby certifies that, pursuant to the Certificate
of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, and in accordance with Section
151(g) of the Delaware General Corporations Law, the Board of Directors of the
Corporation on July 11, 2000 duly adopted the following resolution, which
resolution remains in full force and effect as of the date hereof:

RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority granted to and vested in the
Board of Directors and in accordance with the provisions of the Certificate of
Incorporation, the number of shares of Series A Preference Stock designated in
the Certificate Of Designation, Preferences And Other Rights (The Series A
Certificate of Designation) of this Corporation is reduced, subject to the
filing of the Certificate of Decrease with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware, as set forth below:



| | 1. |  | Section 1 of the Certificate of Designation is amended by
replacing the words Six Million (6,000,000) in the second sentence
with the words Four Million Five Hundred Thousand (4,500,000).
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]



---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Decrease to be executed by a duly authorized officer on July 17, 2000.

|                       |  |                                                                                             
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|PICTURETEL CORPORATION
|                      
|By:
Name:
Title:       |  | ______________________________
______________________________
______________________________

2
a2 &

/

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS

A a a

FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED ST, ATES: 1920—POPU

NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE

Se ikaw iron

259

(o1-o7m)

LATION

|

}

SUPERVISOR'S DISTRICT No.....>_

ENUMERATION DISTRICT No LZ§—

snout WARD OF CITY
yp

a

SHEET No. va ;
SHAN)
5 LR Py

Crrmmexsair.

fh

EDUCATION.

HP

NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE.

Hh lie

RODD ant
UV UY

‘osm Meh ot ach om wn pawn ooh pen sence Hy ath Tad An at tutor. Ha fren Bi, ne the pla at snd —

CCL ce

>

if
j
T

aT

Ft

IT.

9.

| [For

L
ri

4A
va
sbesl

3757

4
5797

in

S5se266

pus
EAN