alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ WAYNE      GRONQUIST  |   |   |        |   |
| Wayne      Gronquist           |   |   |   |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer   |   |   |        |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer   |   |   |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |   |
| Date: April      15, 2009 |   |   |   |   |

----
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 2757

_____________________________ A RNOLD T HOMAS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

V ICKI T. T HOMAS , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

August 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The amended petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

R AY , C.J., and B ILBREY and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Arnold Thomas, pro se
, Petitioner

. No appearance for Respondent

.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-16-00466- CV

Joshu a S. Cof

fee, Appellan t
v. Ke lly Lyn n Cof

fee, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 200 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -F M- 13- 0069 63, H ONO RAB LE STEP HEN Y ELENOSK Y , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On J une 24, 2016, J oshua S. C o ff ee att empted an appea l from the district court’s “Or der on Motion to Clarify Divorce Dec ree ” and “Or der in Suit for Modification of Support Orde r and to Confirm Support Arre ara g e,” both sig ned on Mar ch 29, 2016.

I n response to our letter quest i oning jurisdiction over this appea l, Coffee contends that “by his calc ulations” the filing of his motion for new trial extended his appellate timetable. See Tex. R. App. P
. 26.1(a) (providing that cer tain timely

filed postjudgme nt motions extend time for filing notice of appea l). Motions for new trial are timely if filed within 30 day s afte r the complainedof judgme nt or order is signe d. Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a)
. Under this rule, Coffee ’s deadline for filing his motion for new trial was April 28, 2016. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 4.1; Tex. R. Civ. P. 3 29b(a)
. Howeve r, as Coffee acknow ledg es in his response and the rec ord confirms, he did n o t fi le hismotion for new trial until April 29, 2016. T hat untimely motion for new trial did not extend the 1 filing deadline for Coffee ’s notice of appea l, and the time to seek an extension for filing the notice of appea l ha s expired. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 26.3; Gilani v

. Kaempfe , 331 S.W .3d 879, 879 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011, no pet.) (dismissing appea l for want of jurisdiction afte r concluding that appellant’ s motion for new trial filed 31 day s afte r signing of judgme nt was untimely and failed to extend appellate timetable); see also Aziz v. W aris , No. 01-15-00175- CV, 2015 Tex. App. L EXI S 9068, at *7 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug
. 27, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appea l for want of jurisdiction afte r concluding that appellant’ s motion for new trial was filed day afte r deadline)
. Once the t ime for fil i n g a n o t i ce o f appea l and seeking an ex tension of t ime to file t he notice of appea l have expired, a party cannot invoke an appellate court’s jurisdiction. See Verburgt v. Dorne r , 959 S.W .2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997).

Coffee ’s J une 24, 2016 notice of appea l from the orders sig ned on Mar ch 29, 2016 is untimely , and we lack jurisdiction over this appeal
. Ac co rd i n g ly , we dismiss this appea l for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(a)
.

J eff Rose, Chief J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Goodwin a nd Bour land Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Aug ust 11, 2016

The district court need not have considere d the untimely motion for new trial and no order 1 on the motion appear s in the clerk’ s rec ord. 2
#### SEMINOLE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. W. Hugh DUNCAN, Appellee.

No. 72-848.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Volie A. Williams, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,134                  18,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,335                   7,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (420)                   (470)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,651                   8,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,474                  36,512
<PP&E>                                           1,990                   2,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,554)                 (1,706)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,950                  37,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,269                   2,892
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                        431                       0
<COMMON>                                           280                  18,400
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,929                  16,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,950                  37,984
<SALES>                                         29,698                  49,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,698                  49,352
<CGS>                                           19,058                  30,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,058                  30,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,133                   5,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,548                  12,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,562                   4,968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,986                   7,796
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,986                   7,796
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.60                    1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42                    0.80


</TABLE>
Exhibit
4.6


 


DESCRIPTION
OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES


REGISTERED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


 


As
of December 31, 2020, Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“we” or “our”) had one class of securities, common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (“common stock”), registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. The following description of our common stock is a summary and is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to, the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws. You
should also refer to the copies of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws which
have been filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


 


We
have the authority to issue an aggregate of 30,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common stock and 1,000,000 shares of $0.0001
par value preferred stock. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “PCSA.” The following
is a summary of our common stock:


 


Dividend
Rights. Subject to the rights of holders of preferred stock of any series that may be issued and outstanding from time
to time, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends and other distributions as may be declared by our
Board of Directors from time to time.


 


Voting
Rights. Each outstanding share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders
generally. In the event we issue one or more series of preferred or other securities in the future such preferred stock or other
securities may be given rights to vote, either together with the common stock or as a separate class on one or more types of matters.
The holders of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights.


 


Liquidation
Rights. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of our common stock will
be entitled, subject to any preferential or other rights of any then outstanding preferred stock, to receive all assets of the
Company available for distribution to stockholders.


 


Preemptive
Rights. As of the date hereof, the holders of our common stock have no preemptive rights in their capacities as such holders.


 


Board
of Directors. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors.
At any meeting to elect directors by holders of our common stock, the presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority
of the voting power of shares of our capital stock then outstanding will constitute a quorum for such election. Directors may
be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present and entitled to vote on the election of directors, except for directors
whom the holders of any then outstanding preferred stock have the right to elect, if any.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the NuCo2
Inc. Consolidated  Financial Statements as of December 31, 1996 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                      31,235,268
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                1,647,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   331,777
<INVENTORY>                                                     79,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            33,609,632
<PP&E>                                                      39,253,613
<DEPRECIATION>                                               4,791,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              73,683,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        4,853,457
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         7,163
<OTHER-SE>                                                  60,031,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                73,683,084
<SALES>                                                      8,404,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             8,404,185
<CGS>                                                        4,064,864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                8,514,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             456,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                407,670
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            407,670
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   407,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
#### Cumsie GIBBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-457.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 23, 1973.

Appeal reinstated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,778,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,184,800
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,419,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,015,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          649,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,015,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,994,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,893,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (128,800)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,228,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,228,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,228,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    40.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 10459]

Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that there is a sufficient factual basis to find that the relevant circumstances described in section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (hereinafter “INA”) (8 U.S.C. 1189), exist with respect to al-Ashtar Brigades (AAB), also known as Saraya al-Ashtar.

Therefore, I hereby designate the aforementioned organization and its aliases as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the INA.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: June 19, 2018.

Michael R. Pompeo,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-14837 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
#### Hector Cornillot LLANO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1415.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 28, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1978.

Nicholas J. Capuano, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Linda Collins Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.

*1261PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged in an information with unlawfully throwing, placing or discharging a bomb with intent to do damage to the property of Air Canada, in violation of Florida Statute 790.161.

Appellant was tried in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida without a jury. The trial judge found him guilty of the offense charged and sentenced him to ten years in the state penitentiary.

By this appeal appellant seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial judge’s finding that appellant was guilty of the unlawful throwing, placing or discharging a bomb, since the evidence adduced and that upon which the court based the conviction tended to show that appellant was not the perpetrator but was only involved in a conspiracy in aiding and abetting the crime.

We have carefully considered the point on appeal in the light of the controlling principles of law, transcript of the testimony and evidence offered during trial, briefs and arguments of counsel, and have concluded that reversible error has not been made to appear. *State*v. *Dent,*322 So.2d 543 (Fla.1975); *Damon*v. *State,*289 So.2d 720 (Fla.1973); *Hernandez v. State,*323 So.2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); *Heineman v. State,*327 So.2d 898 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and *Hampton*v. *State,*336 So.2d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Affirmed.
May 22, 2015

Mr. Gavin Shouppe 4K Aerial Imaging

4336 Lakewood Dr Marianna, FL 32448

Dear Mr. Gavin Shouppe:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 10, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0972), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 99.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

I, J. Charles Copeland, President and Chief Executive Officer of FNB Banking Company (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

| (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of theCompany for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                          |

Dated: March [__], 2003

|  | /s/ J. CharlesCopeland          J. Charles CopelandPresident andChief Executive Officer |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Raphael LAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-708.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 7, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### CITY OF CORAL GABLES, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellants, v. CITIZENS’ LEAGUE, INC., a non-profit corporation duly chartered and organized under the Laws of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-427.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.