alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14


 


RESEARCH AGREEMENT – AMENDMENT
#1


 


The following is Amendment #1 (“Amendment”)
to the Research Agreement (“Agreement”) between the Regents of the University of Michigan (“University”) and SunHydrogen,
Inc., (“Sponsor”) dated October 1, 2021.


 


The Parties agree that Article 1.1
shall be deleted entirely and replaced with the following:


 


“Project” means the research
project described in ORSP 22-PAF00982 and 23-PAF01834 under the direction of Nirala Singh as Principal Investigator entitled “Manufacturing
Science to Increase Efficiency of Photoelectrosynthetically Active Heterostructures for H2 Production” and as attached to this Agreement
by Exhibit A.


 


The Parties agree that Article 1.2
shall be deleted entirely and replaced with the following:


 


“Contract Period” is from October
1, 2021 through September 30, 2023, unless earlier terminated pursuant to this Agreement.


 


The Parties agree
that additional funding of $298,194 is awarded by this Amendment. Article 4.1 shall be deleted entirely and replaced with the
following:


 


Total costs to Sponsor for the Contract Period will not exceed
Five Hundred Ninety Four Thousand, Six Hundred Forty Two Dollars ($594,642) which shall be paid by Sponsor in equal quarterly installments
during the Contract Period. Payment will be made by Sponsor within 30 days of receipt of an invoice. Notice of any dispute regarding the
charges in an invoice must be provided in accordance with Article 16 and include a description of the item(s) in dispute and a reasonably
detailed explanation of the reason for the dispute. Sponsor will be billed monthly for actual charges incurred by the University. Any
dispute regarding the charges in the final invoice must be made within 90 days after receipt.


 


All other terms of the Agreement shall
remain unchanged.


 






     


     


    

 


	AGREED TO:	 
	 	 
	SUNHYDROGEN, INC	 	REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Woosuk Kim
    		By:	/s/ Peter J. Gerard
  
	(signature)	 	(signature)
	 	 	 
	Name:	Woosuk Kim	 	Name:	Peter J. Gerard
	Title:	Chief Operating Officer	 	Title:	Asst. Director-Sponsored Programs
	Date:	September 29, 2022	 	Date:	10-4-2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy (DoN) announces the availability of the inventions listed below, assigned to the United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy, for domestic and foreign licensing by the Department of the Navy.

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed to Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg. 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg. 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001, Email                         *Christopher.Monsey@navy.mil,*                         812-854-2777.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following patents are available for licensing: Patent No. 9,987,996 (Navy Case No. 200223): VEHICLE WITH AT LEAST ONE MULTIPURPOSE EQUIPMENT ITEM MOUNTED ON A WINCH AND ASSOCIATED METHODS OF USE//Patent No. 10,001,417 (Navy Case No. 2001416): ADAPTIVE HEAT FLOW CALORIMETER//and Patent No. 10,006,770 (Navy Case No. 200402): REMOTE LOCATION DETERMINATION SYSTEM.

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: July 23, 2018.

James Edward Mosimann III,

Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-16017 Filed 7-26-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7652

DEREK SPROUSE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Rossie David Alston, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00670

- RDA

- IDD )

Submitted : March 29, 2022 Decided: April 1, 2022

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Derek Sprouse, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derek Sprouse, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order dismissing, on 28 U.S.C. § 1915A review, his petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the Supreme Court of Virginia to act. We have reviewed the record and find no revers ible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Sprouse v. V irginia , No. 1:21

- cv 00670

- RDA

- IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2021). We deny Sprouse’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
IC 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1276 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2013 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To increase oversight of the Revolving Fund of the Office 

of Personnel Management. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1276 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Security Clearance 

3 Oversight and Reform Enhancement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. OVERSIGHT OF THE REVOLVING FUND OF THE OF5 FICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. 

6 Section 1304(e) of title 5, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), in the first sentence, by 

9 inserting before the period the following: ‘‘, and for 

10 the cost of audits, investigations, and oversight ac11 tivities relating to the fund and the functions fi12 nanced by the fund, conducted by the Inspector Gen13 eral of the Office’’; and 

14 (2) in paragraph (5), by adding at the end the 

15 following: ‘‘Each budget submitted under this para16 graph shall include an estimate from the Inspector 

17 General of the Office of the amount required to pay 

18 the reasonable expenses to adequately audit, inves19 tigate, and perform other oversight activities relating 

20 to the fund and the functions financed by the fund 

21 for the applicable fiscal year, which shall not exceed 

22 0.33 percent of the total budgetary authority reVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:34 Oct 12, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1276.RFH S1276

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

S 1276 RFH

1 quested in the budget estimates submitted to Con2 gress by the Office for that fiscal year.’’. 

Passed the Senate October 10, 2013. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23(ii)

                            T.C. EDWARDS & CO., P.C.
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                   Since 1902

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE BOSTON BANCORP:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Company's Form S-8 (No.
33-28724) Registration Statement of the report dated January 2, 1996, relating
to the consolidated statements of financial condition of The Boston Bancorp and
Subsidiaries of October 31, 1994, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended October 31,
1994 and 1993, which report appears in The Boston Bancorp's annual report to
Stockholders for the year ended October 31, 1995, and which is incorporated by
reference in The Registration Statement.

/s/ T.C. Edwards & Co., P.C.

Woburn, Massachusetts
January 25, 1996


800 WEST CUMMINGS PARK o SUITE 5800 o WOBURN, MA 01801-6585 o (617) 935-7050
 o FAX (617) 933-4958
120 WEST BROADWAY o DERRY, NH 03038-2803 o (603) 434-0499 o FAX (603) 434-9594
# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Michael J. Smith,  President
 and Chief  Financial  Officer of TriMaine  Holdings,  Inc.,  certify  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimaine Holdings, Inc. for the quarterly
               period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
               requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
               of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 12, 2004

/s/ Michael J. Smith  Michael J.
SmithPresident andChief Financial Officer

---

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
TriMaine Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by TriMaine Holdings, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15760]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 02/02-0621 issued to 
Brookside Pecks Capital Partners, L.P., said license is hereby declared 
null and void.

United States Small Business Administration

    Dated: July 2, 2018.
A. Joseph Shepard,
Associate Administrator for Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2018-15760 Filed 7-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the November
30, 1999 consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,053,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  946,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,000,787
<PP&E>                                       1,027,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                (63,916)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,800,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,353,456
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,500,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,116
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,786,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,800,344
<SALES>                                      1,505,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,505,053
<CGS>                                          403,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  403,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,126,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,760)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,760)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
#### Jerry ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Charles GOODLETT et al., Appellee.

No. 72-897.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 20, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### The STATE of Florida ex rel. Fred JEFFERSON, Relator, v. E. Wilson PURDY, Sheriff of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-347.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 3, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6821

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EUGENE ROLAND SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-94-210, CA-97-482-2)

Submitted: October 27, 1998 Decided: November 13, 1998

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Roland Smith, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-94-210; CA-97-482-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr.

3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Jesse STATEWRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 8, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
See a ee a eee . ra
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS anno /f som l#-s [mane
SIXTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1940 Fete
“* x Baumersted by me on “SPS /

POPULATION SCHEDULE aL. te

‘RESIDENCE APatt 1 1985

ie WHAT PLACE TREE PRASOR LIVE OS APETS 1. ms) eed ‘OCCePSTIOS, (NDUSTET, AND Clas oF WORE
= ear oe aie
UTES paper eee = nora fpr ener hpere

“Ea mith. ee ees ‘ee Se

stg ae! i eee
Pa ume 5 J setting mull
Taser Efe ih ether eae f 4 Ean
B

‘o| Member of Derwewbeld. bo eeter wf
tt | COMM cen Maa)

vy 1 20

oat

kk Re
BY FE IS BSE [E] sewer

= Ric ite

Rie

Bi fe he

RRP
SSSssy

Pe |e te

lal
ce

hale

a8

¥

Le fe

Buu

LAP

bal wale

Pit
a
SPER

i - RE Rine Pte te ft TY a5) Pe [=| see, omate on

GREK RE

a

>
=

pares Are”

DL ber Pe
Titsaheigacr

h

PRESS S
<4

Sint ieta

a4

h>
ie.

+4

SEREE B

RPRARR b

Heee Ficl Kis

NSS RR
=

| = B

Ss
Ke

is

LNB € |

|
—-

|
|
|

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

POR PERSONS 14 YEARS OLD AND OVER

SaUA OoCePATOOM, ENDUETEY, 4x0 CLUsS OF WOREER

ie al corns wich pee aa kis eas Sn. vile be i pares
Sakic xogeemeed whch bet partly sae Hore PES i
Tees peewa wile prevbns wus enpuchenen, ext “ane” bs Cu, and Ingen Cul, ot ant at

a ls

Desa!
<n
—

S| gest tet merrnge
#### SHEARSON, HAMMILL & CO., Inc., and Alfred Cinque, Appellants, v. George VOUIS, Appellee.

No. 41335.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. *1,*1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb.. 15, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
• 

I 

!I 

r; 

7 

.0

I . 

1 

13 

1, 

15 

16 

1

"'

.,

I 

10 

30 

31. 

.32

a_ 

34 

3tl 

36 

37 

3' 

4 

• 1

:1 

.. IJ 

60 

-

STATE _ 

Cou�,T . ., . "

DEPAATMEN·r OF COMMERC ND LABOR BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 

THIRTEENTH OENS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1910· Po/,,c

ULJTION ( E tw1ERATIOH 01 TRICT NO .. _o{_ �--

TOWNSHIP OR OTHER OIVISION OF COUNT'Y • NAME OF INCOR OA,\TEO f

> LACE 

_...__.. � I I 

.. ·-····-·- ....... _ .................. 

-

I lltM"f"J '''"'I,.,, !Ml.I ... 11,,i,.J 

-·

� 

·-•l .... 

' ....... ot 

.... ,.__ dMit, 

- _..__ .. u.1,. 'llll�. � -- -·---·-• 11.., l.u:ftliM1h.. 

--··· __ ,. __ 

lnat•,-0•; 

····--· ...... 

J ----.---,_._ .......... .....,�

(j 

WARD OF crtv.--4---'...,,._ ________ _ 

• 

N:. E r i ISTI UTICN ---�---•-�·••· --··-···-- . . ••. __ • . . � • . _ •• 

tr� . , ... bt•.tJ.t.lli. u .... ,. lb.d ...... J)•ll -...i •iJliit. u�. I ■.Iii!

U TII)_ . 

-

l 

---1 

:I 

• J.JI •=

.. r ,._.11 p,tr.ffll ,. i..,.., ;!11,rc, r.r at,r,J,. oa A prll I,'), 

1010. "&.• ll'I I bl, farnllJ. 

l[aCU, ••mnze A"4. tli.--. U••· 11•..-• ..... ••4' ... .fl• 

lsl&l&.I. II '"'. 

1-1"" ••dT JKI r ll•l>•r - April I�, 1918. 0•11

Olin.In. ..... �.f .IJnl lJ, 1■10. 

II f.L.l Tl.OS. 

U.. LliU ••·• Iii II' •f 111 L.._ t,r"" 

._ •• Ule •rad of 1.1111• 

c..Jl1 • 

' 

J 0-N 

I 

---

u d

.... 

.nu

, 

ll,,

. 

11u }

--�·-·•--•-.-,- I 

J ENUMERATED BY l�E ON THE ···-·····-···--·- ·····-··-···· DAY OF •• ··-··--···--····-·-·-·· 1910. 

r1na rr . 

J 

,. 

&ot:c no:1. 

..

• 

•

-1--•· ---I -�--t-- --•--

1 

I 

• • 

l. I .

• 

2, 

I 

,l,L,.(._l.L4-,) 

-

•• J..-

I ,)--

-

I 

-

c:..c.-.,r.-...-, 

I I

-• I

I ,, 

• 

-----------------· ---. -··· ... - --- --+--

,,. � <1-r-A._.. ;ti,; I <AI 

I I •

�-

�.,,. 1.uv -,_ fr...--:( 

I_� LUA� �

..,���:::::::....-,--=�--�I--+-_

+-' --1-�l -�l ::!:! .. tt---.-=-====; 

--:--2.-� r� �;; ·

-

,,.,

···��

o??,.!=::-. ��--�--�-;::�- �-- ------tr!t·I;' I�/ j) - • j'!c..o'

:-

::.=;t\·i;'�--- -��1��- ;

'£« 

••• 

-

- --�'it . -�� -f-"'I�i:·-� , 11f -�-J-----•---.--. . , 

-

I

I - �an�L�����-���� 

I -· ··----- -----· ----- --

6""!.... --,I i:-c.. -- ,_ . -z:_l "1-

-� /Jf • W I 

,,-/ 1-11--.-1...r:-- - • • 

• 

'-····-··--·--··--=--�-4:l:'t:_ '-�--- -�_..,....k_ ,-i.,, � '72- .

...... ,,,_; � I 

' ______________ ..,__ • -···--------------- ---····· • •+•••--1-

-------------

.:?ft' o-< � UJ "J..4Jo '----1---- :J.

I 1 ZtJ t41T 

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly 

I 

I 

---

r. 

-zu w

'l(J 

--+--�,--•--------�� --··-· !�_!_{�:-•• ·ii,• ·iJ ;i: -�-

1��·.2 1.- v )ml m 

.3 

� J'. ,, u-.--A. I "�L ic.1 r ..i.-v< (, I v� - .

- I

-

4 

I I 

' 

I 

I 

I I 

I 

I 

I 

/ 

.I 

[ _ _1,. _ _J_!_ --1------��::::::::::::=�_Y/_ _'μ!� 

-�-;-, -1

W ·-�- _____ _ 

._➔-�' --1----===�___!_/�:d���:;;; ��_J_:::SZ!,��'£ J. l,b, "JJ

/.3.. � 17'1 // 

• 1 

• 

0 

1.3 

lfi 

81, 

35 

87 

Si 

,o 

4-✓
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6475

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIDO MAURICE THOMPSON, a/k/a Tito Thompson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00294-GCM-1)

Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tido Maurice Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Dana Owen Washington, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tido Maurice Thompson appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce 

his sentence pursuant to Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and 

conclude the district court properly found it lacked the 

authority to reduce Thompson’s 120-month sentence, which was the 

statutory mandatory minimum. See United States v. Munn, 595 

F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010) (explaining that this court 

reviews de novo the district court’s “conclusion on the scope of 

its legal authority under § 3582(c)(2)”); see also Dillon v. 

United States, __ U.S. __, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2690–92 (2010) 

(clarifying that § 3582(c)(2) does not authorize a resentencing, 

but rather permits a sentence reduction within the narrow bounds 

established by the Sentencing Commission). Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United 

States v. Thompson, No. 3:05–cr–00294–GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 284 ) ll-K - 

# (I ) -9 7 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:58AM Sheet 284 of 325P. 2 

# Natura l Gas Monthl y 

# ra Februar y 198 4 Energy Informatio n Administratio n Offic e o f Oi l an d Gas U.S . Departmen t of Energ y Washington , D.C . 2058 5

Thi s repor

t was prepare d b

y th e Energ y Informatio n Administra tion , th e independen t statistica l an d analytica l agenc

y withi n th e Departmen t o

f Energy . Th e infor

- -matio n containe d herei n shoul d no t b e construe d as advocatin g o rnecessaril y reflectin g an y polic y positio n o

f th e Departmen t of Energ yo ran y othe rorgani zation . DOE/EIA-013 0 (84/02 ) Distributio n Categor

yUC-9 8 

# A-83-2 7 I I-K-(I)-9 7
#### Ola SUMMERALL, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOIST AND DERRICK COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-552.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 10, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
254 La. 134

#### SALLEY GROCER COMPANY, Inc. v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY.

No. 49823.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 223 So.2d 5.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.