alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 37044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16343]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation; Notice of Meeting 
Amended

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a meeting of the Veterans' 
Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation (VACOR) will be held on Tuesday 
and Wednesday, August 28-29, 2018, in Room 542, 1800 G Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20006. The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. EST and 
adjourn at 4:00 p.m. EST each day. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
on the rehabilitation needs of Veterans with disabilities and on the 
administration of VA's rehabilitation programs.
    On August 28, 2018, Committee members will be provided with updated 
briefings on various VA programs designed to enhance the rehabilitative 
potential of disabled Veterans.
    On August 29, 2018, the Committee will begin consideration of 
potential recommendations to be included in the Committee's next annual 
report.
    Although no time will be allocated for receiving oral presentations 
from the public, members of the public may submit written statements 
for review by the Committee to Sabrina McNeil, Designated Federal 
Officer, Veterans Benefits Administration (28), 810 Vermont Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20420, or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f5c6e6d7d66616e21426c416a66634f796e21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5f6c4c7d7cccbc48be8c6ebc0ccc9e5d3c48bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>. In the 
communication, writers must identify themselves and state the 
organization, association or person(s) they represent. Because the 
meeting is being held in a government building, a photo I.D. must be 
presented at the Guard's Desk as part of the clearance process. Due to 
an increase in security protocols, and in order to prevent delays in 
clearance processing, you should allow an additional 30 minutes before 
the meeting begins. Any member of the public who wishes to attend the 
meeting should RSVP to Sabrina McNeil at (202) 461-9618 no later than 
close of business, August 20, 2018, at the phone number or email 
address noted above.

LaTonya L. Small,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-16343 Filed 7-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, Inc. and James L. Wilson, Defendants-Appellees-Appellants.

No. 3163.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 2, 1970.

Stafford, Pitts & Bolen, by James Michael Small, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

McLoughlin, Barranger, West, Provosty & Melancon, by Lloyd C. Melancon, New Orleans, Lewis & Lewis, by John M. Shaw, Opelousas, and Laborde & St. Romain, by P. J. Laborde, Marksville, for defendants-appellees.

Before FRUGÉ, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, Judge.

This is one of three consolidated lawsuits arising out of a fire of unknown origin. For the reasons assigned in Guiffre v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., La. App., 237 So.2d 402, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are taxed one-half to plaintiffs and one-half to defendants.

Affirmed.
No. 00-1060.

#### Konwinski *v.*Pirie, Acting Secretary of the Navy, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-6721.

#### Jenkins *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certio-rari denied.
#### Paul Eugene CUMMINGS, Appellant, v. Dorothy June CUMMINGS, Appellee.

No. 73-465.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 12, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1974.

Bernard C. Silver, of Antinori, Cohen & Thury, P. A., Tampa, for appellant.

Ann Loughridge Kerr, Tampa, and Walter W. Manley, Lakeland, for appellee.

GRIMES, Judge.

The judgment is hereby modified to the extent that the attorney’s fee to be awarded appellee’s attorney for services below is set at $350.00 according to the prior stipulation of the parties. The reference to costs which appears in the judgment shall be deleted, without prejudice to the right of the appellee to file a motion to tax costs in the lower court.

Nothing herein shall prevent the appellant from seeking an order under F.R.C.P. 1.540, 31 F.S.A., whereby the party who received property as a result of the divorce would be declared primarily liable, as between the parties, for debts which are secured by liens on that property.

Except as noted above, the judgment is affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and NANCE, L. CLAYTON, Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 4.5

 


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED VIACOMCBS
EXCESS 401(k) PLAN FOR DESIGNATED SENIOR EXECUTIVES- 


PART A (2021 RESTATEMENT) &


PART B (2021 RESTATEMENT)


 


 


Effective as of February 16, 2022, the ViacomCBS Excess
401(k) Plan for Designated Senior Executives (each of Part A and Part B) is amended such that, for all periods on or after February 16,
2022, all references to “ViacomCBS” or “ViacomCBS Inc.” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount Global”,
including such that: all references to the “ViacomCBS Administrative Committee” or “ViacomCBS Investments Committee”
shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount Global Administrative Committee” and “Paramount Global Investments Committee”,
respectively; all references to “ViacomCBS 401(k) Plan” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount Global 401(k) Plan”;
and reference to “ViacomCBS Inc.” in the definition of “Company” shall be deemed to refer to “Paramount
Global”.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to a resolution of the
Paramount Global Administrative Committee, the undersigned hereby executes this amendment this 7th day of October, 2022.


 


 


	 	 
	 	By:	 	
    /s/ Mark Beatty

	 	 	 	Name: Mark Beatty
	 	 	 	
    Its: Member, Paramount Global


    Administrative Committee
#### Eddie VINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
(This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000                                 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          21,308
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             118
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,875
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     69,008
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          50,535
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            51,143
<LOANS>                                        846,352
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,031,599
<DEPOSITS>                                     651,032
<SHORT-TERM>                                   135,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,328
<LONG-TERM>                                    152,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,031,599
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,849
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,352
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,201
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,694
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,997
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,204
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      403
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,225
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,225
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.39
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,306
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   368
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,600
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       57
<RECOVERIES>                                       194
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,140
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          7,140
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel., Jimmy Ray GALLOW v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 62865.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1978.

In re: Jimmy Ray Gallow, applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Evangeline.

Writ denied.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16047]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD


Sunshine Act Meetings Notice

TIME AND DATE:  Every other Wednesday through Fiscal Year 2018 at 2:00 
p.m., beginning on August 8, 2018. Meeting updates, such as changes in 
date and time or cancellations, will be posted at www.nlrb.gov.

PLACE:  Board Agenda Room, No. 5065, 1015 Half St. SE, Washington DC.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Pursuant to Sec.  102.139(a) of the Board's 
Rules and Regulations, the Board or a panel thereof will consider ``the 
issuance of a subpoena, the Board's participation in a civil action or 
proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or 
disposition . . . of particular representation or unfair labor practice 
proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of the [National Labor Relations] 
Act, or any court proceedings collateral or ancillary thereto.'' See 
also 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Roxanne Rothschild, Deputy 
Executive Secretary, 1015 Half Street SE, Washington, DC 20570. 
Telephone: (202) 273-2917.

    Dated: July 24, 2018.
Roxanne Rothschild,
Deputy Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-16047 Filed 7-24-18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1447 

AN ACT 

To make technical corrections to the Navajo water rights 

settlement in the State of New Mexico, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1447 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Mexico Navajo 

3 Water Settlement Technical Corrections Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NAVAJO WATER SETTLEMENT. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 10302 of the Omnibus 

6 Public Land Management Act of 2009 (43 U.S.C. 407 

7 note; Public Law 111–11) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Arrellano’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘Arellano’’; and 

10 (2) in paragraph (27), by striking ‘‘75–185’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘75–184’’. 

12 (b) DELIVERY AND USE OF NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER

13 SUPPLY PROJECT WATER.—Section 10603(c)(2)(A) of 

14 the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub15 lic Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1385) is amended— 

16 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘Article III(c)’’ 

17 and inserting ‘‘Articles III(c)’’; and 

18 (2) in clause (ii)(II), by striking ‘‘Article III(c)’’ 

19 and inserting ‘‘Articles III(c)’’. 

20 (c) PROJECT CONTRACTS.—Section 10604(f)(1) of 

21 the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub22 lic Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1391) is amended by inserting 

23 ‘‘Project’’ before ‘‘water’’. 

24 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

25 10609 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

26 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1395) is amended— 
3 

†S 1447 ES

1 (1) in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b), 

2 by striking ‘‘construction or rehabilitation’’ each 

3 place it appears and inserting ‘‘planning, design, 

4 construction, rehabilitation,’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘2 percent’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘4 percent’’; and 

7 (3) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ‘‘4 percent’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘2 percent’’. 

9 (e) AGREEMENT.—Section 10701(e) of the Omnibus 

10 Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111– 

11 11; 123 Stat. 1400) is amended in paragraphs (2)(A), 

12 (2)(B), and (3)(A) by striking ‘‘and Contract’’ each place 

13 it appears. 

Passed the Senate December 4, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1447 

AN ACT 

To make technical corrections to the Navajo water 

and for other purposes. rights settlement in the State of New Mexico,
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



        We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Novell, Inc. of our report dated November 19, 1999, included in the
1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of Novell, Inc. Our audits also included the
financial statement schedule of Novell, Inc., listed in Item 14(a). This
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial
statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

        We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-14531, No. 33-29798, No. 33-36673, No. 33-54483, No.
33-64998, No. 33-65440, No. 33-66704, No. 33-67276, No. 33-68336, No. 333-04775,
No. 333-04823, No. 333-62087, and No. 333-62103) pertaining to the Employee
Stock Option and Stock Purchase Plans of Novell, Inc. of our report dated
November 19, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Novell, Inc. incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended October 31, 1999.



                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
January 26, 2000
co

‘ ‘s ee ay gaa ome Ben ; t
4 PAT ej.i¢ =
V7
i ‘
7 Ne
yi
‘ \
¥
a
: /
/ | qe
Ws) Az] .
J i a 1 a et | sit}
/ i tala} fa y
. ) .
m4 ‘ ais “| :
at: d |
vs f mh, | ib Le Xp pATN
fa ! | ais / TABS
Av js] ids / jaj2is | « * <
y ‘4 Be cal } | [75 y \ t
i a | 44. ‘i | 4 tet | - ATA
j iN sy Niviy
| ‘|
vy is beqede | ‘|e | x
v Ca ie a {2}7 Filed | a ‘
rae) 4} | 7 7 ie a a Pe ve é J
EW. | | ‘| fe ;
2 v7] 1\4@ \4.} ‘ ; Npala
a / “eats 7 ‘ J Y i i <
eae). ik, * aa 7 2 ,
Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.
Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.
ae ae Ty ~ SE TS: .
U . 4 Wate da ee
#### David M. WOOLIN and Annie Woolin, his wife, et al., Appellants, v. Richard M. WHITE, as Trustee, Appellee.

No. 73-386.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,046,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,415,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                (1,129,860)
<INVENTORY>                                 13,705,033
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,787,305
<PP&E>                                       2,828,994
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,402,755)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,885,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,606,655
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,887,435
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,885,049
<SALES>                                     12,378,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,378,031
<CGS>                                        7,417,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,417,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,242,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                75,360
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (50,635)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                720,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (245,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            475,270
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   475,270
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1470 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with respect to the 

guidelines for specification of certain disposal sites for dredged or fill material. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. KAINE (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with 

respect to the guidelines for specification of certain disposal sites for dredged or fill material. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commonsense Permit5 ting for Job Creation Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GUIDELINES FOR SPECIFICATION OF CERTAIN DIS7 POSAL SITES. 

8 Section 404(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Con9 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1344(b)) is amended by adding at the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1470 IS

1 end the following: ‘‘The guidelines described in this sub2 section shall not prohibit the specification of a site due 

3 to the lack of a final site plan resulting from the lack of 

4 an identified end-user or industry or industrial classifica5 tion for the site in determining whether there exists a 

6 practicable alternative to a proposed discharge that would 

7 result in less adverse impact on the aquatic ecosystem.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91 l W6-05-D-0003 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60565 

Craig A. Holman, Esq. 

Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Kara M. Klaas, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute which is the subject of the appeal having been settled, the appeal is 

hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement is 

not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within one year 

of the date of this Order. 

Dated: 27 July 2017 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60565, Appeal of Aurora Flight 

Sciences Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Mulcahy, a Taxpayer, etc., *v.*City of Akron et al.

*Municipal corporations*— Awarding *public contracts*— Conflict *between state statutes and municipal charter*— Statutes *not violated in instant case.*

(No. 18704

Decided December 9, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Summit county.

*Messrs. Gommins, Brouse, Englebeck & McDowell,*and *Messrs. Rockwell & Grant,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Henry M. Hagelbarger,*director of law, *Messrs. Smoyer, \Glmedinst & Smoyer,*and *Messrs. Mather, Nesbitt & Wilkie,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by thi-s court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that the record in this cause was ordered certified by this court under a misapprehension that it involved the question whether, in the matter of letting public contract where the provisions of a charter of a chartered city are in conflict with the statute applicable thereto, the provisions of the charter supersede the provisions of the statutes. The record disclosing that no provision of the statutes pertaining to the letting of public contract has been violated, there was no error in the judgment of the Court of Appeals, whatever reasons it may have assigned for such judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Conn, JJ., concur.