Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2018 / Notices 34983 

who send electronic files or mail 

printouts. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 17,263. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. (This is not the cost of 

respondents’ time, but the indirect costs 

respondents may incur for such things 

as purchases of specialized software or 

hardware needed to report, or 

expenditures for accounting or records 

maintenance services required 

specifically by the collection.) 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

Legal Authority: Title 13, United 

States Code, Sections 131 and 182. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the 

Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15761 Filed 7–23–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act. 

Agency: U.S. Census Bureau. 

Title: Manufacturers’ Unfilled Orders 

Survey. 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0561. 

Form Number(s): MA–3000. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Number of Respondents: 6,000. 

Average Hours per Response: 30 

minutes. 

Burden Hours: 3,000. 

Needs and Uses: The data collected in 

the Manufacturers’ Unfilled Orders 

(M3UFO) Survey will be used to 

benchmark the new and unfilled orders 

information published in the monthly 

Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, 

and Orders (M3) Survey. The M3 Survey 

collects monthly data on the value of 

shipments, inventories, and new and 

unfilled orders from manufacturing 

companies. The data are used by the 

Bureau of Economic Analysis, the 

Council of Economic Advisers, the 

Federal Reserve Board, the Conference 

Board, and members of the business 

community such as trade associations 

and the media to analyze business 

conditions in the manufacturing sector. 

The associated monthly M3 Survey 

estimates are based on a panel of 

approximately 5,000 reporting units that 

represent approximately 3,100 

companies and provide an indication of 

month-to-month change for the 

Manufacturing Sector. These reporting 

units may be divisions of diversified 

large companies, large homogenous 

companies, or single-unit 

manufacturers. The M3 estimates are 

periodically benchmarked to 

comprehensive data on the 

manufacturing sector from the Annual 

Survey of Manufactures (ASM), the 

Economic Census (shipments and 

inventories) and the M3UFO Survey, 

which is the subject of this notice. 

Unfilled orders data are not collected in 

the ASM or the Economic Census. To 

obtain more accurate M3 estimates of 

unfilled orders, which are also used in 

deriving M3 estimates of new orders, we 

conduct the M3UFO Survey annually to 

be used as the source for benchmarking 

M3 unfilled orders data. Industries that 

maintain unfilled orders cannot fulfill 

the order in the same month in which 

the order is received. This is not true for 

each industry, and occurs mainly in 

industries where production takes 

longer than one month. In order to 

reduce burden from our respondents, 

the M3UFO data are used to determine 

which North American Industry 

Classification System (NAICS) 

industries continue to maintain unfilled 

orders. We then utilize that information 

to only request unfilled orders on the 

monthly M3 survey from the NAICS 

industries that actually have unfilled 

orders which cannot be completed 

within the same month that the order 

was placed. 

There are no changes to the MA–3000 

form, which is used to conduct the 

M3UFO survey. 

The Census Bureau will use mail out 

or mail back survey forms to collect the 

data with online reporting encouraged. 

Online response for the survey is 

typically 70 percent. Companies are 

asked to respond to the survey within 

30 days of receipt. The Census Bureau 

mails letters encouraging participation 

to companies that have not responded 

within 30 days and later uses telephone 

follow-up to seek response from 

delinquent companies. 

Affected Public: Businesses or other 

for-profit. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., 

Sections 131 and 182. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. 

Follow the instructions to view 

Department of Commerce collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the 

Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15816 Filed 7–23–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[Application No. 92–14A001] 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

ACTION: Notice of issuance of an 

amended Export Trade Certificate of 

Review to Aerospace Industries 

Association of America, Inc., 

Application no. 92–14A001. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce issued an amended Export 

Trade Certificate of Review to 

Aerospace Industries Association of 

America, Inc. (‘‘AIA’’) on July 9, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade 

and Economic Analysis, International 

Trade Administration, by telephone at 

(202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free 

number) or email at etca@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of 

the Export Trading Company Act of 

1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the 

Secretary of Commerce to issue Export 

Trade Certificates of Review. The 

regulations implementing Title III are 

found at 15 CFR part 325 (2014). The 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 

International Trade Administration, 

Office of Trade and Economic Analysis 

(‘‘OTEA’’) is issuing this notice 


jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with NOTICES
34984 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2018 / Notices 

pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b), which 

requires the Secretary of Commerce to 

publish a summary of the issuance in 

the Federal Register. Under Section 

305(a) of the Export Trading Company 

Act (15 U.S.C. 4012(b)(1)) and 15 CFR 

325.11(a), any person aggrieved by the 

Secretary’s determination may, within 

30 days of the date of this notice, bring 

an action in any appropriate district 

court of the United States to set aside 

the determination on the ground that 

the determination is erroneous. 

Description of Certified Conduct 

AIA’s Export Trade Certificate of 

Review has been amended to: 

1. Add the following companies as 

new Members of the Certificate within 

the meaning of section 325.2(l) of the 

Regulations (15 CFR 325.2(l)): 

• ACUTRONIC USA, Inc.; Pittsburgh, 

PA (controlling entity ACUTRONIC 

Holding AG; Bubikon, Switzerland) 

• ADI American Distributors LLC; 

Randolph, NJ 

• Advanced Logistics for Aerospace 

(ALA); New York, NY (controlling 

entity ALA SpA; Naples, Italy) 

• Aernnova Aerospace; Ann Arbor, MI 

(controlling entity Aernnova 

Aerospace; Min ̃ ano, Spain) 

• Aero Metals Alliance Inc.; 

Northbrook, IL (controlling entity 

Aero Metals Alliance; Surrey, UK) 

• AeroVironment, Inc.; Monrovia, CA 

• AlixPartners, LLP; New York, NY 

• Alta Devices, Inc.; Sunnyvale, CA 

(controlling entity Hanergy Holding 

Group Ltd.; Beijing, China) 

• Altitude Industries, LLC; Overland 

Park, KS 

• Amazon.com, Inc.; Seattle, WA 

• American Metal Bearing Company; 

Garden Grove, CA (controlling entity 

Marisco, Ltd.; Kapolei, HI) 

• Athena Manufacturing, LP; Austin, 

TX 

• Boom Technology, Inc.; Denver, CO 

• BRPH Architects Engineers, Inc.; 

Melbourne, FL 

• Burns & McDonnell Engineering 

Corporation, Inc.; Kansas City, MO 

• BWX Technologies, Inc.; Lynchburg, 

VA 

• Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc.; 

Tempe, AZ (controlling entity Solvay 

Group; Brussels, Belgium) 

• Delta Flight Products; Atlanta, GA 

(controlling entity Delta Air Lines, 

Inc.; Atlanta, GA) 

• EPTAM Plastics; Northfield, NH 

• Garmin International, Inc.; Olathe, KS 

(controlling entity Garmin Ltd.; 

Schaffhausen, Switzerland) 

• General Atomics Aeronautical 

Systems, Inc.; Poway, CA (controlling 

entity General Atomics; San Diego, 

CA) 

• Google LLC; Mountain View, CA 

(controlling entity Alphabet Inc.; 

Mountain View, CA) 

• GSE Dynamics, Inc.; Hauppauge, NY 

• Information Services Group, Inc.; 

Stamford, CT 

• Integral Aerospace, LLC; Santa Ana, 

CA 

• ITT Inc.; White Plains, NY 

• Job Performance Associates, LLC; 

Jacksonville, FL 

• JR Industries, Inc.; Westlake Village, 

CA 

• ManTech International Corporation; 

Fairfax, VA 

• Mercury Systems, Inc.; Andover, MA 

• Net-Inspect, LLC; Kirkland, WA 

• New England Airfoil Products, Inc.; 

Farmington, CT 

• Nokia US; Murray Hill, NJ 

(controlling entity Nokia Corporation; 

Espoo, Finland) 

• Norsk Titanium US Inc.; Plattsburgh, 

NY (controlling entity Norsk Titanium 

AS; H<nefoss, Norway) 

• Omega Aerial Refueling Services, Inc.; 

Alexandria, VA 

• Orbital ATK, Inc.; Dulles, VA 

• Pegasus Steel, LLC; Goose Creek, SC 

• PrecisionHawk Inc.; Raleigh, NC 

• Primus Aerospace; Lakewood, CO 

• PTC Inc.; Needham, MA 

• Range Generation Next LLC; Sterling, 

VA (controlling entities Raytheon 

Company; Waltham, MA and General 

Dynamics IT; Fairfax, VA) 

• Special Aerospace Services, LLC; 

Boulder, CO 

• SupplyOn North America, Inc.; San 

Diego, CA (controlling entity 

SupplyOn AG; Hallbergmoos, 

Germany) 

• The Aerospace Corporation, Civil 

Systems Group; El Segundo, CA 

(controlling entity The Aerospace 

Corporation; El Segundo, CA) 

• The Lundquist Group LLC; New York, 

NY 

• Tribus Aerospace Corporation; 

Poway, CA 

• TT Electronics; Perry, OH (controlling 

entity TT Electronics plc; Woking, 

UK) 

• Unitech Aerospace; Hayden, ID 

2. Delete the following companies as 

Members of AIA’s Certificate: 

• Accurus Aerospace Corporation, LLC 

• Aerospace Exports Incorporated 

• AirMap 

• Ascent Manufacturing, Inc. 

• Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation 

• Barnes Group Inc. 

• C4 Associates, Inc. 

• Camcode Division of Horizons, Inc. 

• Castle Metals 

• CDI Corporation 

• Curtiss-Wright Corporation 

• Cytec Industries, Inc. 

• FLIR Systems, Inc. 

• Fluor Corporation, Inc. 

• HP Enterprise Services—Aerospace 

• J Anthony Group, LLC 

• Lavi Systems, Inc. 

• LMI Aerospace, Inc. 

• Micro-Coax, Inc. 

• NYLOK, LLC 

• Oxford Performance Materials 

• Park-Ohio Holdings Corp 

• SCB Training, Inc. 

• Seal Science, Inc. 

• SIFCO Industries, Inc. 

• SITA 

• Spacecraft Components Corporation 

• Sunflower Systems 

• United Parcel Services of America, 

Inc. 

• Verizon Enterprise Solutions, Inc. 

• Vogelhood 

3. Change in name or address for the 

following Members: 

• Acutec Precision Machining, Inc. of 

Saegertown, PA is now named Acutec 

Precision Aerospace, Inc. of 

Meadville, PA 

• Alcoa Defense of Crystal City, VA is 

now named Arconic Inc. of New York, 

NY 

• Computer Sciences Corporation of 

Falls Church, VA is now named DXC 

Technology Company of Tysons 

Corner, VA 

AIA’s amendment of its Export Trade 

Certificate of Review results in the 

following membership list: 

• 3M Company, St. Paul, MN 

• AAR Corp., Wood Dale, IL 

• Accenture, Chicago, IL 

• Acutec Precision Aerospace, Inc., 

Meadville, PA 

• ACUTRONIC USA, Inc., Pittsburgh, 

PA 

• ADI American Distributors LLC, 

Randolph, NJ 

• Advanced Logistics for Aerospace 

(ALA), New York, NY 

• Aerion Corporation, Reno, NV 

• Aernnova Aerospace, Ann Arbor, MI 

• Aerojet Rocketdyne, Rancho Cordova, 

CA 

• Aero-Mark, LLC, Ontario, CA 

• Aero Metals Alliance Inc., 

Northbrook, IL 

• The Aerospace Corporation, Civil 

Systems Group, El Segundo, CA 

• AeroVironment, Inc., Monrovia, CA 

• AGC Aerospace & Defense, Oklahoma 

City, OK 

• Aireon LLC, McLean, VA 

• AlixPartners, LLP, New York, NY 

• Allied Telesis, Inc., Bothell, WA 

• Alta Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA 

• Altitude Industries, LLC, Overland 

Park, KS 

• Amazon.com, Inc., Seattle, WA 

• American Metal Bearing Company, 

Garden Grove, CA 


jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2018 / Notices 34985 

• American Pacific Corporation, Las 

Vegas, NV 

• Analytical Graphics, Inc., Exton, PA 

• Apex International Management 

Company, Daytona Beach, FL 

• Arconic Inc., New York, NY 

• Astronautics Corporation of America, 

Milwaukee, WI 

• Astronics Corporation, East Aurora, 

NY 

• Athena Manufacturing, LP, Austin, 

TX 

• AUSCO, Inc., Port Washington, NY 

• Avascent, Washington, DC 

• B&E Group, LLC, Southwick, MA 

• BAE Systems, Inc., Rockville, MD 

• Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp., 

Boulder, CO 

• Belcan Corporation, Cincinnati, OH 

• Benchmark Electronics, Inc., 

Angleton, TX 

• The Boeing Company, Chicago, IL 

• Bombardier, Montreal, Canada 

• Boom Technology, Inc., Denver, CO 

• Boston Consulting Group, Boston, MA 

• BRPH Architects Engineers, Inc., 

Melbourne, FL 

• Burns & McDonnell Engineering 

Corporation, Inc., Kansas City, MO 

• BWX Technologies, Inc., Lynchburg, 

VA 

• CADENAS PARTsolutions, LLC, 

Cincinnati, OH 

• CAE USA Inc., Tampa, FL 

• Capgemini, New York, NY 

• Celestica Inc., Toronto, Canada 

• Click Bond, Inc., Carson City, NV 

• Cobham, Arlington, VA 

• CPI Aerostructures, Inc., Edgewood, 

NY 

• Crane Aerospace & Electronics, 

Lynnwood, WA 

• Cubic Corporation, Inc., San Diego, 

CA 

• Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., 

Tempe, AZ 

• Cyient Ltd., Hyderabad, India 

• Deloitte Consulting LLP, New York, 

NY 

• Delta Flight Products, Atlanta, GA 

• Denison Industries, Inc., Denison, TX 

• Ducommun Incorporated, Carson, CA 

• Dupont Company, New Castle, DE 

• DXC Technology Company, Tysons 

Corner, VA 

• Eaton Corporation, Cleveland, OH 

• Elbit Systems of America, LLC, Fort 

Worth, TX, 

• Embraer Aircraft Holding, Inc., Fort 

Lauderdale, FL 

• EPS Corporation, Tinton Falls, NJ 

• EPTAM Plastics, Northfield, NH 

• Ernst Young LLP, New York, NY 

• Esterline Technologies, Bellevue, WA 

• Exostar, LLC, Herndon, VA 

• Facebook, Inc., Menlo Park, CA 

• Flextronics International USA, Inc., 

San Jose, CA 

• Flight Safety International, Inc., 

Flushing, NY 

• FS Precision Tech, Co. LLC, Compton, 

CA 

• FTG Circuits, Inc., Chatsworth, CA 

• Garmin International, Inc., Olathe, KS 

• General Atomics Aeronautical 

Systems, Inc., Poway, CA 

• General Dynamics Corporation, Falls 

Church, VA 

• General Electric Aviation, Cincinnati, 

OH 

• GKN Aerospace North America, 

Irving, TX 

• Google LLC, Mountain View, CA 

• GSE Dynamics, Inc., Hauppauge, NY 

• Harris Corporation, Melbourne, FL 

• HCL America Inc., Sunnyvale, CA 

• HEICO Corporation, Hollywood, FL 

• Hexcel Corporation, Stamford, CT 

• Honeywell Aerospace, Phoenix, AZ 

• Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 

Newport News, VA 

• IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY 

• Information Services Group, Inc., 

Stamford, CT 

• Integral Aerospace, LLC, Santa Ana, 

CA 

• Iron Mountain, Inc., Boston, MA 

• ITT Inc., White Plains, NY 

• Jabil Defense & Aerospace Services 

LLC, St. Petersburg, FL 

• Job Performance Associates, LLC, 

Jacksonville, FL 

• JR Industries, Inc., Westlake Village, 

CA 

• Kaman Aerospace Corporation, 

Bloomfield, CT 

• KPMG LLP, New York, NY 

• Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, 

Inc., San Diego, CA 

• L–3 Communications Corporation, 

New York, NY 

• LAI International, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ 

• Leidos, Inc., Reston, VA 

• Lockheed Martin Corporation, 

Bethesda, MD 

• Lord Corporation, Cary, NC 

• LS Technologies, LLC, Fairfax, VA 

• The Lundquist Group LLC, New York, 

NY 

• ManTech International Corporation, 

Fairfax, VA 

• Marotta Controls, Inc., Montville, NJ 

• Meggitt-USA, Inc., Simi, CA 

• Mercury Systems, Inc., Andover, MA 

• Microsemi Corporation, Aliso Viejo, 

CA 

• Momentum Aviation Group, 

Woodbridge, VA 

• MOOG Inc., East Aurora, NY 

• MTorres America, Bothell, WA 

• National Technical Systems, Inc., 

Calabasas, CA 

• NEO Tech, Chatsworth, CA 

• Net-Inspect, LLC, Kirkland, WA 

• New England Airfoil Products, Inc., 

Farmington, CT 

• Nokia US, Murray Hill, NJ 

• The NORDAM Group, Inc., Tulsa, OK 

• Norsk Titanium US Inc., Plattsburgh, 

NY 

• Northrop Grumman Corporation, Los 

Angeles, CA 

• Omega Aerial Refueling Services, Inc., 

Alexandria, VA 

• O’Neil & Associates Inc., Miamisburg, 

OH 

• Orbital ATK, Inc., Dulles, VA 

• Pacific Design Technologies, Goleta, 

CA 

• The Padina Group, Inc., Lancaster, PA 

• Parker Aerospace, Irvine, CA 

• Pegasus Steel, LLC, Goose Creek, SC 

• Plexus Corporation, Neenah, WI 

• PPG Aerospace-Sierracin Corporation, 

Sylmar, CA 

• PrecisionHawk Inc., Raleigh, NC 

• Primus Aerospace, Lakewood, CO 

• Primus Technologies Corporation, 

Williamsport, PA 

• PTC Inc., Needham, MA 

• PWC Aerospace & Defense Advisory 

Services, McLean, VA 

• Range Generation Next LLC, Sterling, 

VA 

• Raytheon Company, Waltham, MA 

• Rhinestahl Corporation, Mason, OH 

• Rix Industries, Benicia, CA 

• Rockwell Collins, Inc., Cedar Rapids, 

IA 

• Rolls-Royce North America Inc., 

Reston, VA 

• salesforce.com, inc., San Francisco, 

CA 

• SAP America, Inc., Newtown Square, 

PA 

• Securitas Critical Infrastructure 

Services, Inc., Springfield, VA 

• Siemens PLM Software, Plano, TX 

• Sierra Nevada Corporation, Littleton, 

CO 

• Sparton Corporation, Schaumburg, IL 

• Special Aerospace Services, LLC, 

Boulder, CO 

• Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., Wichita, KS 

• SupplyOn North America, Inc., San 

Diego, CA 

• Tech Manufacturing, LLC, Wright 

City, MO 

• Textron Inc., Providence, RI 

• Therm, Incorporated, Ithaca, NY 

• Tip Technologies, Waukesha, WI 

• Tribus Aerospace Corporation, 

Poway, CA 

• TriMas Aerospace, Los Angeles, CA 

• Triumph Group Inc., Wayne, PA 

• TT Electronics, Perry, OH 

• Unitech Aerospace, Hayden, ID 

• United Technologies Corporation, 

Hartford, CT 

• Universal Protection Services, Santa 

Ana, CA 

• Verify, Inc., Irvine, CA 

• Virgin Galactic, LLC, Las Cruces, NM 

• Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corporation, 

Valencia, CA 

• Woodward, Inc., Fort Collins, CO 

• Xerox, Norwalk, CT 

The effective date of the amendment 

is April 4, 2018, the date on which 


jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with NOTICES
34986 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2018 / Notices 

1 17 CFR 145.9. 

2 16 respondents × 250 annual responses per 

respondent = 4,000 total responses, × 0.1 hours per 

response = 400 total annual burden hours. 

3 16 respondents × 1 annual response per 

respondent = 16 total responses, × 2,606 hours per 

response = 41,696 total annual burden hours. 

AIA’s application to amend was deemed 

submitted. 

Dated: July 19, 2018. 

Joseph Flynn, 

Director, Office of Trade and Economic 

Analysis, International Trade Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15807 Filed 7–23–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Notice of Intent To Extend 

Collection 3038–0069, Information 

Management Requirements for 

Derivatives Clearing Organizations 

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC or 

Commission’’) is announcing an 

opportunity for public comment on the 

proposed collection of certain 

information by the agency. Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’), 

Federal agencies are required to publish 

notice in the Federal Register 

concerning each proposed collection of 

information, including each proposed 

extension or renewal of an existing 

collection of information, and to allow 

60 days for public comment. This notice 

solicits comments on reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements relating to 

information management requirements 

for derivatives clearing organizations 

(‘‘DCOs’’). 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before September 24, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by OMB Control No. 3038– 

0069, by any of the following methods: 

• The Agency’s website, at http://

comments.cftc.gov/. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments 

through the website. 

• Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 

Secretary of the Commission, 

Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 

1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 

20581. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as 

Mail above. 

Please submit your comments using 

only one method. All comments must be 

submitted in English, or if not, 

accompanied by an English translation. 

Comments will be posted as received to 

http://www.cftc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eileen Chotiner, Division of Clearing 

and Risk, Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission, (202) 418–5467; email: 

echotiner@cftc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., Federal 

agencies must obtain approval from the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(‘‘OMB’’) for each collection of 

information they conduct or sponsor. 

‘‘Collection of Information’’ is defined 

in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3 

and includes agency requests or 

requirements that members of the public 

submit reports, keep records, or provide 

information to a third party. Section 

3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies 

to provide a 60-day notice in the 

Federal Register concerning each 

proposed collection of information, 

including each proposed extension of an 

existing collection of information, 

before submitting the collection to OMB 

for approval. To comply with this 

requirement, the Commission is 

publishing notice of the proposed 

extension of the collection of 

information listed below. 

Title: Information Management 

Requirements for Derivatives Clearing 

Organizations (OMB Control No. 3038– 

0069). This is a request for extension of 

a currently approved information 

collection. 

Abstract: Part 39 of the Commission’s 

regulations establishes information 

management requirements for registered 

DCOs. The Commission will use the 

information in this collection to assess 

compliance of DCOs with requirements 

for DCOs prescribed in the Commodity 

Exchange Act and Commission 

regulations. 

With respect to the collection of 

information, the CFTC invites 

comments on: 

• Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information will have a practical use; 

• The accuracy of the Commission’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

• Ways to enhance the quality, 

usefulness, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and 

• Ways to minimize the burden of 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. 

You should submit only information 

that you wish to make available 

publicly. If you wish the Commission to 

consider information that you believe is 

exempt from disclosure under the 

Freedom of Information Act, a petition 

for confidential treatment of the exempt 

information may be submitted according 

to the procedures established in § 145.9 

of the Commission’s regulations.1

The Commission reserves the right, 

but shall have no obligation, to review, 

pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or 

remove any or all of your submission 

from http://www.cftc.gov that it may 

deem to be inappropriate for 

publication, such as obscene language. 

All submissions that have been redacted 

or removed that contain comments on 

the merits of the information collection 

requirements will be retained in the 

public comment file and will be 

considered as required under the 

Administrative Procedure Act and other 

applicable laws, and may be accessible 

under the Freedom of Information Act. 

Burden Statement 

1. COLLECTION 3038–0069—DAILY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS

[Regulation 39.19] 

Estimated number of respondents per year 

Reports 

annually 

by each 

Total annual 

responses 

Estimated 

average 

number of 

hours per 

response 

Estimated 

total 

annual 

burden hours 

16 ..................................................................................................................... 250 4,000 0.1 2 400 


jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with NOTICES