alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Carl WELSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-658.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 11, 1972.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that appellant filed his Notice of Appeal on July 21, 1971, and that the order to which such notice was directed was entered on July 22, 1971, such appeal failed to confer jurisdiction upon this court and must be dismissed on authority of Dam v. David, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 338; Martin v. Martin, Fla.App.1971, 258 So.2d 6.

Dismissed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
261 La. 825

#### Gloria CARMOUCHE, Widow of Aloe J. OCMOND, Jr. v. Ruth D. ESERMAN et al.

No. 52405.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 1972.

In re: Gloria Carmouche, widow of Aloe J. Ocmond, Jr. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 259 So.2d 600.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
<PAGE>

FIRST CENTRAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                  EXHIBIT 12

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      1996               1995              1994              1993              1992
                                                      ----               ----              ----              ----              ----
<S>                                               <C>                <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
 and Taxes on Realized Gains                      $(14,029,197)     $   (595,447)     $  7,659,645     $  5,951,889     $  3,443,824

Fixed Charges
 Interest Expense on EDP Equipment                        --               6,510            13,783           35,651           38,868
Interest Expense on Debt                               513,266           594,763           626,475          786,819        1,012,730
Interest Component of Rent Expense                        --                   0           112,000          112,000          112,000
Amortization Debt Issue Costs                          157,796           103,093           170,044          268,389          283,384
                                                  ------------      ------------      ------------     ------------     ------------
Total Fixed Charges                                    671,062           704,366           922,302        1,202,859        1,446,982
                                                  ============      ============      ============     ============     ============
Total Earnings (Losses) (See Note)                $(13,358,135)     $    108,919      $  8,581,947     $  7,154,748     $  4,890,806
                                                  ============      ============      ============     ============     ============
Ratio of Earnings (Losses) to Fixed
Charges                                               (19.9):1             0.2:1             9.3:1            5.9:1            3.4:1
                                                  ------------      ------------      ------------     ------------     ------------
</TABLE>



NOTE:     For the purpose of  computing  the ratio of earnings to fixed  charges
          (i) earnings represent net income,  plus income taxes and any taxes on
          realized  investment  gains plus fixed  charges and (ii) fixed charges
          represent interest expense, plus amortization of capitalized debenture
          costs plus the interest  components  of rent expense  under  operating
          leases.

<PAGE>
#### JOHN G. LANE LINE, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, Florida, Appellee.

No. I-157.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

March 7, 1967.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1967.

Martin Sack, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant.

William M. Madison, Claude L. Mullís and William Lee Allen, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff seeks review of a final decree denying it the injunctive relief it seeks by its complaint herein, and dismissing with prejudice the cause.

By its complaint plaintiff asserts that it is the owner of a parcel of land in the City of Jacksonville presently zoned as Residence *17C” and usable only for residential purposes; that this parcel is adjacent to another parcel of land owned and occupied by plaintiff which is zoned Business “B” and usable for general business, distribution, and light industry and is in fact presently used and occupied by plaintiff in connection with the operation of its business; that plaintiff’s property zoned for Residence “C” use is no longer desirable or adaptable to that purpose but has a value only for those uses permitted by Business “B” zoning regulations; that it applied to defendant city for a rezoning of its parcel from Residence “C” to Business “B,” which application was denied; that such denial was arbitrary, discriminatory, confiscatory, and illegal, having no substantial relationship to public health, safety, morals, or general welfare and constitutes a taking of plaintiff’s property without due process of law.

Upon the evidence adduced at the hearing the chancellor found that the parcel in dispute was in fact no longer adaptable for use as residential property. The chancellor further found, however, that the change in character of the land in dispute which occurred between the date of zoning and the present did not arise from natural or other causes beyond the control of the plaintiff which rendered it no longer adaptable to residential use. The chancellor found that the change in character of the property resulted directly from the use to which plaintiff devotes the adjacent parcel of land owned by it under a Business “B” zoning classification and on which it operates its business. The chancellor concluded that to rezone plaintiff’s land to a Business “B” classification would work an unjustifiable hardship on the homeowners whose property is zoned for residential use only and which surrounds the disputed parcel of land on three sides.

The chancellor found that whether the zoning regulations of the city, as applied to plaintiff’s property, are reasonable and hear a just relationship to the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the community and its citizens was fairly debatable and therefore falls within the ambit of the city’s discretion in denying plaintiff’s application for rezoning. The chancellor’s conclusion is amply supported by the record under the established principles of law prevailing in this state, and therefore must be affirmed.1

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

1

. Dade County v. Mitchell, (Fla.1966) 188 So.2d 359; City of Miami Beach v. Lachman, (Fla. 1953) 71 So.2d 148.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, NHLBI R13 Conference Review.                    

*Date:*                         August 2-3, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Stephanie J. Webb, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0291,                         *stephanie.webb@nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 17, 2018

Michelle D. Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-15620 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
rO S1

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 941 05-3901

AUG 22 2013

Terry O’Neal

6515 Suzette Lane

Flagstaff, Arizona 86001

Dear Terry O’Neal:

Thank you for your letter dated August 6, 2013 to Administrator McCarthy regarding the Navajo

Generating Station and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed rulemaking to implement

the Best Available Retrofit Technology requirement at Navajo Generating Station (NGS). I have been

asked to respond to your letter on behalf of Administrator McCarthy.

EPA appreciates your comment letter and we have added your letter to the administrative record for our

proposed rulemaking on NGS. We will respond to all comments prior to taking final action.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Anita Lee, of my staff, at 1ee.anita(epa.gov.

Sincerely,

Deborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

f’iintc’cl on I?cc c/cd Papcr
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Birner Dental Management
Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78, or 78o(d));
      and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the period covered by the
Report.





Date:
                
                August
      13, 2009By:
                
                /s/ Frederic W.J. BirnerName:
                
                Frederic
      W.J. BirnerTitle:
                
                Chief
      Executive OfficerBy:
                
                /s/ Dennis N. GentyName:
                
                Dennis
      N. GentyTitle:
                
                Chief
      Financial Officer
#### Seibert *v.*Seibert.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *debatable 'constitutional question involved.*

(No. 18631

Decided October 21, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Champaign county.

*Mr. Benjamin E. Seibert,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. McGrew & Laybourwe*and *Messrs. Beaton, Bodey & Bodey,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Conn, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            UNITED DENTAL CARE, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                                      March 31,
                                                                              -------------------------
                                                                                 1997          1998
                                                                              -----------   -----------
<S>                                                                           <C>           <C>        
I.    Reported net earnings
      Net income........................................................      $     1,452   $     1,517
                                                                              ===========   ===========

II.   Basic earnings per share 
      A.   Shares outstanding
           Weighted average number of shares outstanding during
                the period..............................................            8,918         8,952
                                                                              ===========   ===========

      B.   Net income per share.........................................      $      0.16   $      0.17
                                                                              ===========   ===========

III.  Diluted earnings per share
      A. Shares outstanding
             Weighted average number of shares outstanding during
                 the period.............................................            8,918         8,952
             Shares potentially issuable upon the assumed exercise
                 of stock options and conversion of warrants, net of
                 assumed repurchase using the Treasury Stock method.....              241           154
                                                                              -----------   -----------
                 Total common shares and common equivalent shares.......            9,159         9,106
                                                                              ===========   ===========

      B.   Net income per share.........................................      $      0.16   $      0.17
                                                                              ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Iridium
LLC's financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000948421
<NAME> IRIDIUM LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          65,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,281
<PP&E>                                       3,887,153
<DEPRECIATION>                                 498,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,564,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,004,301
<BONDS>                                      1,714,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     44,406
<COMMON>                                     2,031,835
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,242,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,564,602
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               639,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             173,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (812,722)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (812,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (812,722)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.11)
        

</TABLE>
Aa

{or RON
a SN

©
Page No, y 3 ? eos Inquiries numbered 7, 16, and 17 are not to be asked im respect to infants. Inquiries numbered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are to be ans ered a: at ath
= 2h merely by an affirmative mark, as /.

>
if

ScuEepDuLE 1.—Inhabitants in Pccedest Wu AAD Ay, ___, in the County of Pr uf

of LA Zi te ee by me on the _2 2 day of ligast.\
Post Offi 2, ds a Ler YZ 5 sae , lss't Marshal.

|
|
i

Cc NSTI TIONAL

VaLete or UraLt Es7vate
RELATIONS.

OWNED,

-
y

fs
i
|

yeur, state
&c.)

Whether deaf |
and damb,
blind, insane,

—

Age nt Inst birthday. If

numbered in
f2t
viwards,

: ‘

Place of Dirth, naming State
'or Territory of U. S.; or the
Country, if of foreign birth.

Profession, Occupation,
or Trade of cach person,
male or female.

—

| The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day of
Juue, 1870, was in this family.

V.), Black| &
M.), Chi-

in (1)

Veb., & «.)

your, rive months

ro ;
in fractions, thus, 9,
tes (I,)

of visitation,
ee Vhitte (

- Trill

or idiotic.

a ——

Nulatto

the order of visitation,
21 years of age and up- |

month (Jun., b’eb.,
mouth (Jan.,

wards,
years ofnge

under!
Male Citize

If married within the vear, state
Attended school within the year,

Families, oumbered fn the order!

Male Citizens of UL &. of

Value of Personal aren

Dwellirng-houses,
Pother of forcigu birth,
Mother cf foreign birth.
If bern within the
Cunnot write,

Cannot read.

|
|

BH | | Value of Real Lstate,

or
—
=a
ot
ww
or
wy
cont
=
~)

»

am

3

|
‘e
a

{

=

y fal (Marriniglen lie Lle~ \F0\N | LUA _Jt0
—, Mary G VZRAR op Likes tae ~—

ee ee

fer . tildor ZZ | MW DL Uihperenbiarfoeeli¢y
— Mary ALONE val Nora

| _ Lae” EE 1S Via Za amok chert |
| —— Bhoinken \43 UW. Z a ts

: | 3 CLlteverth G wn aw .
| | ~~ Gratll | 4 an 67)
iS ALG ar | 2G

a | Leschard ten ZIAD 2, None. i GA |
F102 aay: Lio: a. We 1 gare: Lege |
| a VL os ‘Cis
? oy) atdchret
Z
op L
y/ a Pear Z eelasalir | te
|\AZ WE: (C2HA Lbrver |
of he YATL hier Z 4 Dp Aipeng Mocaee
ig] CL RW LE Ti te A
i MeL Yeu 1 Ella oh Ly It J4\ | Garzeur 2520

( 27214 WD Aicpong Loowtac |

y ve

{
ce
!

rs sed. e5 Of Ee. te ‘andi |Z ZA Carus Laborer
: S Lentz, eae. Ravan Mefins Noouet, |
> bch ard %2\ n\n ny |_|
biel, (Man. er Pa 0 m t 2 aom Peale. | 2 SFG \ |

’ (Z. Z sracphyarn t PX

LEVANL,
fo") Man

hss Be Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

bal

a2]

eatin

oe 2a W Vlora C | 12h FI stakes tog: * | | Chi
oy ey” 6" F 22 i Lo’
= Omar LUD: 1 SZ
ls Billet G:H YI a Che
Cee _ aa aa a2 ey /A7,

Ae Woz aby |b mM Ga tor-Cr—_| | — ther
ae | WE fol j ro aoe A Lergerri.

4 No.of whitefeunles, /  Nosofmales, foreign bye; | No. of insane,
“ “ familics, __ Bs “*  esolored males, oa “  fomales, \* .

_*¥
_
4

——F

ae “I ~~

a cast Sage
=e SS
PAs TEER SES rr ae

“ “ white males, AS. S\\ females = Ot) lid

—.
in ae —-
'use strict';
(function () {
  if (typeof window.CSS === 'undefined') {
    var myScript = document.getElementById('css_polyfills_loader');
    var src = myScript.getAttribute('src');
    var script = document.createElement('script');
    script.src = src.replace(/-loader.*/, '.min.js');
    script.async = true;
    document.head.appendChild(script);
  }
})()