alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,694
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             821
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,843
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     40,818
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        229,271
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 296,678
<DEPOSITS>                                     264,669
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,013
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           904
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 296,678
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,023
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,487
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   584
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                21,094
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,896
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,090
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,004
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      192
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  78
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,848
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,848
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,409
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.11
<LOANS-NON>                                        699
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,939
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       38
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,093
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,093
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE SECOND
QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                               23,231,327
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>               11,515,185
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                     18,866,681
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>         193,057,503
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                3,844,202
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                  3,888,367
<LOANS>                             723,280,487
<ALLOWANCE>                           2,372,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,013,241,169
<DEPOSITS>                          724,177,185
<SHORT-TERM>                         45,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                  13,376,753
<LONG-TERM>                         122,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 79,327
<OTHER-SE>                          108,607,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>    1,013,241,169
<INTEREST-LOAN>                      27,904,038
<INTEREST-INVEST>                     7,244,947
<INTEREST-OTHER>                        815,088
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                     35,964,073
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                   14,681,561
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   19,248,719
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                16,715,354
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           426,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                      195,072
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                      10,026,555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       7,995,492
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>            7,995,492
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          4,749,266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             3.40
<LOANS-NON>                           3,905,521
<LOANS-PAST>                                  0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                      1,949,677
<CHARGE-OFFS>                             3,000
<RECOVERIES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                     2,372,677
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>               2,372,677
        


</TABLE>
7-224. | ie b MI
TWELFTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES. / 4 iso) lU A Vi

SCHEDULE No. J J—-POPULATION. (Sr eee c

1 Sesereawaction District vo. L24 ES, eR Le * 22,

Pdi (6 awe fish arae pe Re ie of Institution, ——_—— x eee een a Semen neces eon y

SEs “name of township, town, precinct, district, 0 r other oes as the case may ¥ be. See instructions. }

Name of incorporated city, town, or village, within the above-named division lea tar hd how - ee ss senpegpeene een me ELE Ward of city, PP, See ee | z=

VEZ
~ YO eA | AAA... Enumerator.
i | *

y y "i NITIZENSHIP. OCCUPATION, TRADE, OR EDUCATION. . ani
LOCATION, NAME RELATION. PERSONAL DESCRIPTION. NATIVITY. CITI SE FESSION : ,

County _...{Z4-

in

Township or other division of county

Enumerated by me.on the -- LY day of June, 1900, —€

ij
|e
.

=

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If born in the United
States, give the Stale or Territory ; if of foreign birth, give the Country only.

of

of each perscn whose place of
abode on June 1, 1900, was NETH.
in this family.

of each person TEN YEARS of age
and over.

. married,
ivo ;.

livorced
re married,
many

~ | Age at last birthday,

“of dwelling-
rder

house, in the o
of years In the

Enter surname first, then the given name and Relationship of each

middie inital, if any. — ier: © head

Place of birth of this Place of birth of Fatnrn Place of birth of Motuxu
Person. o n. of this person.

of vieitation,

r of how

a < person living on Jane 1, 1900.
chi nm born since June 1, 1900.

Number of those children

living.

ti t
the United States.

Number of farm schedule.

Number of family, in the
Year of immigration to

order

Can epeak English.

Number of yea
hild
ths)
Can read.

visitation.
Whether single

Number

United States,
> | Attended school (in

|:
E

| Owned free or mort

% | Owned or rented.
!

cx «| Color or race.

ww | Number

w 1
-

SES SES

EY RSS

S

L_—
SPIES
Ss ESS PE VRS SEIS

in
SSP
SPS

YSSs
| ES

s

| EBA UE fase. 816 “FL.
Ronshlee | vs Fa SBA L | |
| Head \o) Yy Aig $i ih be 78 , :
Z| \ Fi fede, £6693 012 | 0 2| Lehane. <seeeesag.. 2
SABE |
| (9 %6\ 41
4

743703 ed MAL
TEAGED A f|
1g | 902) ra

a has ~ “us uae By s7 mS |

1943454 Ae 3$ ae
j Qld.
, tn tra Waarase 1972) FL |

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Laer F: v f= LE me Le 7 Be JE Og =
i

MBSY/3\f
pele 2
/L7S\ 4 af |
ht (8458
Langs E448
es
% PTs. /?\#|
#### BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOL BOARD v. William J. GUSTE, Jr., et al.

No. 61609.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Jackie Martin and Fred E. Shew-make, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Bossier. 355 So.2d 64.

Writ denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.

TATE, J.,

is of the opinion that the school board’s policy may be an abuse of its great discretion because of the strong legislative policies designed to permit school teachers and personnel to participate in elective government.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Gabriel Battista, Chief Executive Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), have reviewed the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 and, based on the inquiries I have made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief Executive Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc., I hereby certify that:
 
 (i) the Talk America Holdings, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Talk America Holdings, Inc.
 
 This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive Officer of Talk America Holdings, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Talk America Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Talk America Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 /s/ Gabriel Battista
 Gabriel Battista
 Chief Executive Officer
 November 11, 2003
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent
,

v.

RANDY BOBLITZ , Petitioner

.
No. 1 CA

- CR 20

- 0576 PRPC FILED 6

- 10

- 2021

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2014

- 006080

- 001 The Honorable Nicole M. Brickner
, Judge Pro Tempore

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL
Arizona Attorney General’s Office , Phoenix By Linley Wilson Counsel for Respondent

Randy Boblitz , Kingman PetitionerSTATE v. BOBLITZ Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Paul J. McMurdie, Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, and Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM :

¶1 Petitioner Randy Boblitz seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Proce dure 3 3

. This is Petitioner’s first p etition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior cour t abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete
, 227 Ari z. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the sup erior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find t he petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUMMIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. DATED JUNE 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,643,541
<SECURITIES>                                18,622,853
<RECEIVABLES>                                  893,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,383,327
<PP&E>                                       1,767,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,412,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          963,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,503
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,360,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,412,093
<SALES>                                      1,932,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,932,575
<CGS>                                          992,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,127,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                409,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            409,875
<DISCONTINUED>                               (883,489)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (473,614)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
(This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,739
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          31,376
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     77,464
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,863
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,055
<LOANS>                                      1,013,922
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,224,377
<DEPOSITS>                                     735,968
<SHORT-TERM>                                   201,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,934
<LONG-TERM>                                    189,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,224,377
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 54,152
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,646
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                59,798
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              19,046
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,822
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,976
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,250
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,100
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,100
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,293
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.96
<LOANS-NON>                                        792
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   235
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,500
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       48
<RECOVERIES>                                       379
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,081
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,081
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
#### Richard W. BLACHARSKI, Appellant, v. Walter WATTS, Appellee.

No. 72-27.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 2, 1972.

*466Richard W. Blacharski, in pro. per.

Jack Ackerman, of Johnson, Ackerman & Bakst, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida, sitting in its appellate capacity. The order affirmed a final judgment against the appellant entered by the Small Claims-Magistrate Court for said county. The judgment awarded the plaintiff, Walter Watts, the appellee here, $1,000.00 from the appellant who was the defendant in the trial court.

At the outset we note that this court does not have jurisdiction to review by appeal an order rendered by the Circuit Court sitting in its appellate capacity. Article V, Section 5(3), Florida Constitution 1968, F.S.A. We have elected, however, to treat the proceedings herein as a petition for common law certiorari and will review the order of the circuit court on that basis. The scope of such review is limited to a determination from the face of the record whether the lower court exceeded its jurisdiction or otherwise deviated from the essential requirements of law. Dresner v. City of Tallahassee, Fla.1964, 164 So.2d 208, 210.

From the record before the circuit court it appears that the plaintiff sued the defendant in the Small Claims-Magistrate Court for $1,000.00. His claim was based on two documents. One is entitled, “Pre-subscription Agreement.” It was executed by the plaintiff, the defendant, and John Morían. The other document was drawn on a form designed for use as a promissory note. It was signed by Morían and Thomas F. Navarre, but not by the defendant. The nature of these two documents and the intent of the parties thereto with respect to the defendant’s obligation, if any, to the plaintiff, are not readily apparent from the face of the instruments which are vague and ambiguous in the extreme. Therefore, a record of the extrinsic evidence presented in the trial court was essential to any meaningful review by the circuit court of the final judgment. Unfortunately no such record was presented to the circuit court. This left the court with no alternative but to indulge the presumption of correctness in favor of the trial court’s order and affirm the same on that ground. The circuit court did not avoid its responsibility to review the judgment as appellant here suggests. Rather it is the appellant who failed in his responsibility to present an adequate record for purposes of supporting his appeal. See City of South Bay v. Armstrong, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 21.

*467For the foregoing reasons, we hold that the circuit court’s order of affirmance was in compliance with the essential requirements of law and deny certiorari.

Certiorari denied.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
#### Richard St. Clair WELLINGTON, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Appellee.

No. K-250.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 12, 1968.

*29Richard St. Clair Wellington, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

SPECTOR, Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.

Wellington and an accomplice were charged with armed robbery, and the public defender was appointed to represent them. They both entered guilty pleas in August, 1963. In March, 1968, appellant filed his motion to vacate judgment and sentence contending that he was entitled to his own appointed attorney, and that it was constitutional error to require him to share appointed counsel with his codefendant. In support of his claim, appellant relies on Baker v. State, 202 So.2d 563 (Fla.1967), holding that appointment of counsel to represent two or more defendants denies each of them the right to- effective assistance of counsel.

We reject appellant’s contention and affirm the order appealed. The instant case is factually distinguishable from Baker, supra, in that here there was no trial during the course of which it could be said that there might have arisen conflicting interests, strategies, or defenses which might have at once been detrimental to one of the codefendants and beneficial to his alleged colleague in crime.

In the case at bar, no opportunities for such conflicts existed since appellant and his codefendant both pled guilty. We hold, as did the District Court of Appeals, Second District, Mitchell v. State, 213 So. 2d 289, Opinion Filed August 14, 1968, that the rule in Baker, supra, is not applicable where the defendants entered guilty pleas.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., J., concur.