alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 3

- 00 461

- CR

Style: State of Texas

.

v Isaias Santos III

Date motion filed * : December 20 , 201 3

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: September 16 , 201 3

Number of previous extensions granted: 2 Current d ue date: December 1 1 , 201 3

Date r equested: December 31, 2013

The motion to extend time to file a brief is DENIED. Appellant’s brief was originally due on
September 16 , 201 3

. On September 25, 2013, this C ourt notified appellant that appellant’s brief had not been filed and required a response within 10 days. On October 3 , 201 3 , counsel requested an extension

of time because he had “ various trial settings at [that] time.” We granted the motion and appellant’s

brief was due on October 28 , 201 3

. On November 20, 2013, this Court notified appellant that appellant’s brief had not been filed and required a response within 10 days. On November 26, 2013,

c ounsel requested a second extension without an explanation of why additional time was necessary

. We granted the motion with an admonition that no further extensions would be granted and appellant’s brief

was due on December 11, 2013

.

In the current motion to extend time

, filed on December 20, 2013 , counsel again provides no explanation for his reques ted extension. Accordingly, we deny the motion because counsel has not established extraordinary circumstances for a further extension.

If appellant’s brief is not filed within 10 days of the date of this order , the n the case will be

abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
38(b).

Judge's signature: /s/ Michael Massengale



Panel consists of

_____________________________ _______________

Date: December 31, 2013
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL D. BATES; JOYCE M.

BATES,

 Petitioners - Appellants,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-73333

Tax Ct. No. 1586-08

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted May 24, 2011** 

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Samuel D. and Joyce M. Bates appeal pro se from the Tax Court’s decision

upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination of income tax

deficiencies for years 2003 and 2004, and imposition of a penalty under 26 U.S.C.

FILED

JUN 07 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73333

§ 6662. They also appeal from the Tax Court’s imposition of sanctions under 26

U.S.C. § 6673. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a). We review de

novo the Tax Court’s legal conclusions and for clear error its factual findings. See

Comm’r v. Dunkin, 500 F.3d 1065, 1068 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

The contention that the Bateses were not subject to federal income taxes is

frivolous. See United States v. Nelson (In re Becraft), 885 F.2d 547, 548 (9th Cir.

1989) (order); Treas. Reg. § 1.1-1. No other challenges have been raised to the

Tax Court’s determination of income tax deficiencies, and thus we deem them

abandoned. See Cook v. Schriro, 538 F.3d 1000, 1014 n.5 (9th Cir. 2008) (issues

not raised on appeal are deemed abandoned).

The Bateses conceded they were liable for the accuracy-related penalty

under 26 U.S.C. § 6662 if they were subject to federal income taxes, and thus we

uphold the imposition of this penalty. See Sparkman v. Comm’r, 509 F.3d 1149,

1161 (9th Cir. 2007).

The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by imposing sanctions under 26

U.S.C. § 6673 for the Bateses’ frivolous arguments. See Wolf v. Comm’r, 4 F.3d

709, 716 (9th Cir. 1993) (standard of review).

The Bateses’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
> if2
SisS igh as Ba ee eS nee tL he a a SUPERVISOR'S DISTRICT No. teenies | SHEET No.

FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1920—POPULATION ENUMERATION District No.J/p4¢c2) fo A

ve x
NAME OF INCORPORATED piace Lear. LOTR LAY i aera es batanemesy—————« WARD OF ‘CITY ofl FrH9 2

e ? own ’ ’ ’ ’ . ] |
NAMIE SOR INSTITUTION kee Sn OE ear elle ieee ae ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE_....°7./~___ DAY OF 1920. (Bhanacter 2 Yhoryt7..«... ENUMERATOR. Ox

[lusert name of institutlon, ifuny, aud indicate the lines on which tae éntries are madé, Bee instructions. |

PLACE OF ABODE. NAME RELATION. TORE. PERSSMAL DESCRIPTION. CITIZENSHIP. | EDUCATION. NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE.

of each person whose place of abode on Place of birth of each d of each wumerated. If born in the Ualted the state %
pe P person and parents of each person ¢ edt ese bs mp hs ee orterritery. If of foreign birth, give the place ef birth

a —~—— - = er — —
PERSON, FATHER. NOTHEE.

OCCUPATION.

apeak

®

pet Nam- January 1, 1920, was in this family.

dwell-| ber of Relationship of this
"amll Enter sursame first, then the civyon mame ond middle Lf
|ami , initial, if amy. a — of

of vie
+ [Ital Include every person living o8 Jax: 1, 1920. Omit
= children bora slace January I, 1926.

married,
widowed, or di-

vorced.

3

—-

~ | 4 | Whether able to

: fi

—- -

© | Sex.
Attesded school
any time alace
ept. 1, 1919,

Yeerof iam
tlon totheUuit.
yer of mataral-
tion.

od States.
Naturalised or
If naturalised,

Street, avenu
road, ete.
Home owned or
i owned, free or |
Color or race.
alles.

|
i

Place of birth.

read.
= | Whether able to
write.

: |
19

| A
|

ve
e
Low
7
on |
-
i)
—
t—)
“i

NESS

ee
|

au

Ba

'
co oan ao oOo , &@ we

R S

SISSNS
Shs
A

Se
CREE S

_
o

a
——

|
roe

=

wed
ao

Sac

—_
=

18 ann

-
NN

Gs
Wr

Ss

i]
ae

w

iS

t
A

SESS GS
ce

to
i)

RE

Ss

con
w&
“~s

SESS
ps as

fo PSO
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. James WILLIAMS v. CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, HONORABLE JUDGE SECTION “B”.

No. 61162.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: James Williams applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. Application moot.

*1378CALOGERO, J.,

concurs. The trial judge has appointed John Blanchard, O.I.D.P., to represent petitioner in his out of time appeal.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Preferred Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: May 16, 2005
    /s/  Bradley E. BarksBradley E. BarksChief Financial Officer 1
#### SEMINOLE ASPHALT REFINING, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, a labor organization, Respondent.

No. 43116.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 23, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ, concur.
From: Beaver, Melinda

To: Kordzi, Joe; Lorang, Phil

Subject: FW: Materials for the February 10 Pre-call for the Meeting on Regional Haze in RTP

Date: Thursday, October 08, 2015 4:20:27 PM

Attachments: Agenda for February 10 pre-meeting conference call.docx

Invited March 3-4 attendees as of Feb 3 2015.pdf

Draft Agenda for the EPA-FLM-RPO-States meeting on regional haze program changes (to RPO state & tribal

 reps).docx

Topics III-IV Questions - New Guidance on Regional Haze (to RPO state & tribal reps).docx

Explanation of Pre-meeting materials for the EPA-FLM-RPO-States-Tribes meeting on regional haze program

 changes (Feb. 3 to RPO state & tribal reps).docx

Topics I II Questions - Rulemaking on RHR Revisions (to RPOs states & tribes).docx

Hi Joe,

I’m not exactly sure what you’re looking for (sorry if I missed an email), but I have this email in my

 inbox that Phil sent on Feb 3? I believe I sent the Feb 17 since Phil was on leave?

Let me know if you’re looking for something different,

Melinda

From: Lorang, Phil 

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 5:10 PM

To: djohnson@westar.org; hornback@metro4-sesarm.org; Theresa Pella; Wood, Anna; Rob Kaleel;

 dfoerter@otcair.org; swierman@marama.org; tmoore@westar.org; Bob Lebens

Cc: Jones, Rhea; Beaver, Melinda; Viswanathan, Krishna; Kelly, Bob; Terry, Sara; Tonnesen, Gail;

 Morales, Monica; McKaughan, Colleen; Webb, Thomas; Ruvo, Richard; Lakin, Matt; Timin, Brian;

 Misenis, Chris

Subject: Materials for the February 10 Pre-call for the Meeting on Regional Haze in RTP

Greetings,

Here are the materials to help us during our conference call on Tuesday, February 10, from 12:30-2

 pm. The 2-page “Explanation” is a good place to start reading.

We in EPA are expecting the RPO directors to distribute these materials to state/local people who

 need them, beyond the people addressed in this email. EPA-OAQPS will distribute the materials to

 the FLM staff who will be joining the conference call. EPA does not plan to post these on any of our

 websites.

Phil Lorang, Senior Policy Advisor

Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS

919-541-5463
. @Pf7-+?002 -OU60-oo~p 

CBI: Yes 

$ FINAL 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 99-0669 ENGINEER: Weil/PRH 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: Goldschmidt Chemical Corp. 

USE : c 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS : Yes Label: ,NO 

General Eqp.: 

Respirator: 

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials): 

CRSS : 

Chemical Category: 

VP : c1E-06 torr @25OC 

S-HZO: dispersible 

MW: 

Phys State: NEAT Liquid (est) ; PROC/FORM: 

MANUFACTURE: NK (imported) ; 

END USE: Solid 

Consumer Use: No - 

SAT (concerns) : 

Related cases (if referenced) : P95-0401, P96-0605/0606, 

P96-1079, P96-1503, P97- 

0303, P98-0813 

Ground Water: rapid 

Health: 1-2; Dermal, inhalation 

ECO : 2; All releases to water 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3 

' 5099000Ei 1 1 / 1 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 99-0669 

ASSUMPTIONS: 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

Page # 2 

- .. . 

CBI: Yes 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW No 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 99-0669 

Page # 3 

PROC - : 

Site/Location: 12 unknown 

Days/yr: e250 (CEB standard estimate) 

Process,Description: 

CBI: Yes 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.): 

WATER : < 0.34 kg/site-day over e250 Days/year 

from : drum/pail residual (3%) and blending vessel 

cleaning (1%) 

to: on-site treatment or POTW 

basis: - 

AIR: negligible (VP <: 0.01 torr) 

INCINERATION: <PV 

LANDFILL: not required, per SAT 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 

Tot. # of workers: 48 (4/site per telecon) 

Days/yr : e250 (CEB standard estimate) 

Inhalation: negligible (VP < 0.001 torr) 

Dermal : contact with liquids: 1,300-3,900 mg/day 

assume imported at 100% concentration 

Basis: incidental contact, 2 hands (connecting 

transfer line); drumming of formulation will be at 1- 

2%. 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 4 

PMN: 99-0669 

USE : 

-- 

CBI: Yes 

Site/Location: 

Days/yr : 

basis: 

~850 (generic scenario) 

170 (generic scenario) 

1 (generic scenario) .._ . 

250 (generic scenario) 

- -. 

.. Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container 

residue, - 

WATER : 

refinishing: not expected 

OEM: <2.7 kg/site-day over 250 Days/year 

OR 

<670 kg/site-day over 1 Days/year 

to onsite WWTP or annual sludge pit cleaning: 

basis : 

etc. ) : 

AIR : <23 kg/site/yr (generic scenario) 

INCINERATION: cPV 

LANDFILL: not required, per SAT 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
1. L 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 5 CBI: Yes 

PMN: 99-0669 

USE: (cont.) 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 

- *- 

Tot. # of workers: - <2,550 (3/site, generic 

scenario) L.. 

17 (generic scenario) 

: 250 (generic scenario) 

Days/yr : 170 (generic scenario) 

Inhalation: mist 

~0.19 - 0.75 mg/day over 170 days/year 

cO.O3-- ~0.12 mg/day over 250 days/year 

Basis: 

Dermal : contact with liquids: 65-364 mg/day 

1-2% concentration 

Basis: routine 2-hand immersion; less 

exposure for connecting transfer line (incidental 

contact, 2 hands) 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1440 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1440

  To amend the Small Business Act to allow the use of physical damage 
           disaster loans for the construction of safe rooms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2013

 Mr. Reid (for Ms. Landrieu) introduced the following bill; which was 
    read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 
                            Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Small Business Act to allow the use of physical damage 
           disaster loans for the construction of safe rooms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tornado Family Safety Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. USE OF PHYSICAL DAMAGE DISASTER LOANS.

    Section 7(b)(1)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(b)(1)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``the Administration may increase'' and 
        inserting ``the Administration may, subject to section 18(a), 
        increase''; and
            (2) by striking ``and modifying structures'' and inserting 
        ``, and modifying structures (including construction of a safe 
        room or similar storm shelter designed to protect property and 
        occupants from tornadoes or other natural disasters)''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to United States Code, the United States Mint announces the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (CCAC) public meeting scheduled for July 31, 2018.

*Date:*                         July 31, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EST.                    

*Location:*                         This meeting will occur                         *via teleconference.*                         Interested members of the public may dial in to listen to the meeting at (866) 564-9287/Access Code: 62956028.                    

*Subject:*                         Review and discussion of candidate designs for the 2018 $1 coin that will introduce a new series of dollar coins authorized by the American Innovation $1 Coin Act.                    

*Interested persons should call the CCAC HOTLINE at (202) 354-7502 for the latest update on meeting time and room location.*

In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 5135, the CCAC:

 Advises the Secretary of the Treasury on any theme or design proposals relating to circulating coinage, bullion coinage, Congressional Gold Medals, and national and other medals.

 Advises the Secretary of the Treasury with regard to the events, persons, or places to be commemorated by the issuance of commemorative coins in each of the five calendar years succeeding the year in which a commemorative coin designation is made.

 Makes recommendations with respect to the mintage level for any commemorative coin recommended.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Betty Birdsong, Acting United States Mint Liaison to the CCAC; 801 9th Street NW, Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7200.

Any member of the public interested in submitting matters for the CCAC's consideration is invited to submit them by fax to the following number: 202-756-6525.

Authority:31 U.S.C. 5135(b)(8)(C).

Dated: July 23, 2018.

David J. Ryder,

Director, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. 2018-15986 Filed 7-25-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PICTURETEL'S
BALANCE SHEET & INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          62,642
<SECURITIES>                                    38,078
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,392)
<INVENTORY>                                     30,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,663
<PP&E>                                         202,479
<DEPRECIATION>                               (106,824)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 352,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,341
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,242
<SALES>                                        406,152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               406,152
<CGS>                                          233,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,898)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,679)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (55,679)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.45)
        


</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947986
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          1,241,307
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  86,420,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,077,221
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                187,657,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                       111,326,687
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     72,086,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  187,657,395
<SALES>                                        15,584,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,599,840
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,276,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  200,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              7,266,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,856,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                        2.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        2.85
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>




</TABLE>
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Appellant, v. Nathan MANILOW and Marian Manilow, his wife, Appellees.

No. 71-536.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.