T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AME S A. MOR GA N, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. C L A R K C O U N T Y C R E D IT U N IO N ; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 17605 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 3 3 3 - PM PP AL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da P hi l i p M . P r o, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a m e s A . M or ga n appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt di sm i ss i ng hi s a ct i on ar i si ng fr om the al l eged deni alof di sabi l i ty benef i t s und eran 

# FI LED APR20 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 17605 2 i ns ur a nc e pol i c y . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de n o v o , R hoades v . A v on P r ods . , I nc . , 5 0 4 F . 3 d1 1 5 1 , 1 1 5 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 7 ) , a n dwe a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d f orl a c k of

s ubj e c t - m a tt e rj ur i s di c t i on b ecau se th ere w as n o d i v ersi ty j u ri sd i ct i o n , M o rg an p l ead edo n l y st at e l aw cl ai m s, a n dM o r g a n ’s 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 c la im w a s n o t c o lo r ab le . See A rb a u g h v. Y &H C o rp . , 546 U . S . 500, 513 n. 10 ( 2006) ( “ A c l a i m i nvoki ng f e de r a l - que s t i on j ur i s di c t i on . . . m a ybe di s m i s s e d f orw a ntof

s ubj e c t - m a tt e rj ur i s di c t i on i f i ti s not c ol or abl e , i . e . , i f

i ti s ‘ i m m a t e r i a l a nd m a de s ol e l yf orthe purpos e of

obt a i ni ng j uri sdi ct i on ’ or i s ‘ w ho l l y i nsub st ant i aland fri vo l ou s. ’ ” ( ci t at i on om i tt ed)) . B e c au s e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt la c k e ds u b je c t- m a tte rju r is d ic tio n , it p r o p e r ly d is m is s e dth e s ta te law c la im s . See Sco t t v. P a sa den a U

n i f i ed Sch . D ist . , 306 F . 3d 6 4 6 , 6 6 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) ( e x p la in in g th a t af e d e r a l c o u rt h a s n o d is c r e tio n to r e ta in supp l em ent alj uri sdi ct i on ov erst at e l aw cl ai m s i f the courtdi sm i ss es the fe dera l cl ai m s f or l ac k o f s ubj ec t -m att erj uri sdi ct i on ). W e c o n s tru e th e ju d g m e n t a s ad is m is s a l w ith o u t p r e ju d ic e . See Kell

y v . Fle e tw ood E nte rs . , I

nc . , 37 7 F . 3d 10 34 , 10 36 (9th C i r. 20 04 ).08- 17605 3 I n l i ghtof

ourA pr i l 29, 2009 or de rde ny i ng appoi ntm e ntof c ouns e l a nd s t a t i ng tha tno m ot i ons f orr e c ons i de r a t i on s ha l l be f i l e d ore nt e rt a i ne d, w e do not c o n s id e rM o r g a n ’s c h a lle n g e to th e d e n ia l o f ap p o in tm e n t o f

c o u n s e l. M organ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.