alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                         368,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,753,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                   468,877
<INVENTORY>                                     27,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,147,034
<PP&E>                                      13,515,248
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,115,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,957,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,999,963
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,911,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,957,342
<SALES>                                      8,964,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,562,223
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,804,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              506,91
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                251,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            259,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   259,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles James MALLORY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-161.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 28, 1968.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

BARKDULL, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a conviction of robbery. He and two other men entered a store together. Once inside, they separated; one left, the premises and the appellant went to the rear of the store with the proprietor’s father. Another of the trio stayed at the front of the store and, when approached by the proprietor, he stated he didn’t want anything ; that he was waiting on the appellant and then he pulled a gun, stuck it in the proprietor’s stomach and demanded the money in the cash register. An altercation ensued between the proprietor and the man holding the gun, during which time the appellant grabbed two sweaters and ran. The only one apprehended was the appellant. He was tried on the charge of robbery, convicted, judgment and sentence accordingly.

By this appeal, it is urged that the most the record will sustain is a conviction of petit larceny because it fails to link the appellant’s crime with the actions of the party pulling the gun and demanding that the owner of the store turn over the money in the cash register. We affirm.

The evidence is unrefuted that the appellant and the “gun wielder” entered the store at the same time; that they separated and, while another pulled a gun and demanded money, the appellant grabbed articles not belonging to him and fled from the scene. We find ample evidence to support the conviction, either because the appellant acted in concert with the “gun wielder” or because he took advantage of the situation, adopted the circumstances of the store owner’s being under the threat of a gun and removed personal property not belonging to him. See: Bass v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 614; Perry v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 892; Eaton v. State, 8 Ala.App. 136, 63 So. 41; People v. Lee, 55 Ill.App.2d 371, 204 N.E.2d 588.

Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the conviction, judgment and sentence here under review is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

ELIZABETH A. B OWN 

BY: 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

ANTHONY CORIA, AN INDIVIDUAL; 

AND MCKAYLA INC., D/B/A ALAMO 

HAND CAR WASH & DETAIL, A 

NEVADA CORPORATION, 

Appellants/Cross-Respondents, 

vs. 

ERIC LORETO JORDAN, 

Respondent/Cross-Appellant. 

No. 84058 

FIL 

OCT 07 2022 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK F UPREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUTY 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, 

this appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed. 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge 

Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge 

Stephenson & Dickinson, P.C. 

Rogers, Mastrangelo, Carvalho & Mitchell, Ltd. 

Prince Law Group 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

61. - 31 (42(0 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER
#### William Clinton CHANDLER, Appellant, v. Dorothy Ricketts CHANDLER, Appellee.

No. 70-502.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 31, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Walter L. MEDLIN, Petitioner, v. Honorable Claude R. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Respondent.

No. 72-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1972.

Prohibition denied.
#### Robert K. HUGHES, et al., Appellants, v. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-370.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 22, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Lewis R. DOWDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-231.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 1, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Robert C. Parker, Jr., Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
le-ex46_327.htm



 


				
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
EXHIBIT 4.6




DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES

REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Lands’ End, Inc. has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: our Common Stock.

DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK

The following description of our Common Stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) and our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), each of which are incorporated by reference as exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We encourage you to read our Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws and the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as amended, for additional information.  

Authorized Shares of Capital Stock

Our authorized capital stock consists of 480,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”).  As of January 29, 2021, there were 32,614,088 shares of Common Stock outstanding. The outstanding shares of our Common Stock are fully paid and nonassessable.

Listing

Our common stock is listed and principally traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under the symbol “LE”.

Voting Rights

Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by the stockholders, including the election of directors. Our Common Stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

Dividend Rights

The holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends.

Liquidation Rights

Holders of Common Stock will share ratably in all assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders in the event of dissolution.

Other Rights and Preferences

Our Common Stock has no sinking fund or redemption provisions or preemptive, conversion or exchange rights. Holders of Common Stock may act by unanimous written consent.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Computershare Investor Services is the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock.
#### Randy WILLCUTT, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Bruce L. Willcutt v. Larry T. BROWN.

No. 50163.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 15, 1978.

Pritchard, Myers & Gordon, Robert A. Pritchard, Pascagoula, Hurt & Dickerson, Darryl A. Hurt, Lucedale, for appellant.

W. S. Murphy, Lucedale, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and WALKER and LEE, JJ.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL ON THE ISSUE OF DAMAGES ONLY.

PATTERSON, C. J., ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG, BROOM and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
(This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          21,517
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             102
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0  
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     66,990
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          45,792
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            46,346
<LOANS>                                        884,811
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,058,207
<DEPOSITS>                                     652,308
<SHORT-TERM>                                   119,561
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,284
<LONG-TERM>                                    194,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,058,207
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 31,896
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,598
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,494
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,616
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,399
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,095
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      745
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,267
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,267
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.28
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,491
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   214
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,600
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      178
<RECOVERIES>                                       292
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,459
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          7,459
        


</TABLE>
#### TOWN OF LANTANA, Florida, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 71-212.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 24, 1972.

Malcolm Anderson, West Palm Beach, for appellant Town of Lantana.

C. Robert Burns, of Burns, Middleton, Farrell *&*Faust, Palm Beach, for appel-lees Wakeman Construction Co. & United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Robert T. Scott, of Gunster, Yoakley, Criser, Stewart & Hersey, Palm Beach, for appellee Bethlehem Steel Corp.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs, record, and oral argument, it is the opinion of this court that the appellant has failed to make reversible error appear. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
## NUMBER 13 - 2 3 - 00 448 - CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF MANUEL PEÑA AND ROXANNE ALVARADO PEÑA AND IN THE INTEREST OF M.P.J., A.E.P., AND M.R.P.
On appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron C ounty, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Longoria, Silva, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria
On October 17 , 2023, a ppellant Manuel Peña filed a pro se notice of appeal from a final decree of divorce and order for conservatorship. On October 23 , 2023, the Clerk of th is Court requested appellant to pay the $205.00 filing fee for the notice of appeal within ten days. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5 ( “ A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce2 this rule by any o rder that is just. ” ); T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 51.207 (delineating the required fees and costs in an appellate court). T he Clerk also advised appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e), 25.1(d)(2), and 25.1(d)(4) , and requested corre ction of these defects

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 9.5(e), 25.1(d)(2), 25.1(d)(4); see also id. R. 37.1. On November 1 5 , 2023, the Clerk notified appellant that he was delinquent in submitt ing the filing fee for the notice of appeal and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if the filing fee wa s not paid

. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c). On December 14 , 2023, the Clerk again advised appellant that the notice of appeal was defective, requested correction of the defects, and advised appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defects were not c orrected

. See id. To date, appellant has neither paid the filing fee for the notice of appeal nor filed a corrected notice of appeal. This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC , 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2017, no pet.). Here, appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee and has not filed a corrected notice of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b), (c). NORA L. LONGORIA Justice Delivered and filed on the 29th day of February , 202 4

.
262 La. 1073

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Alfred HUEY, Jr.

No. 52631.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 18, 1972.

In re: Alfred Huey, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

Application denied. Relator has an adequate remedy for review in the event of conviction.

BARHAM, J.,

is of opinion the writ should be granted. See Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85, 88 S.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed.2d 923, and United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 for a clear U. S. Supreme Court adjudication of the precise issue contrary to the trial court.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should be granted. We should not avoid consideration of the constitutionality of the statute under which defendant is charged. In the event of conviction, defendant has no right of appeal unless the sentence is long enough to give this court jurisdiction. There is no right of appeal in Louisiana unless the sentence exceeds mínimums fixed in our Constitution.
#### Robert A. JOHNSON, Jr., Appellant, v. Susan Anita JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 72-484.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 7, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Steven M. Caspers, certify that:



1.

        I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;




2.

        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.

        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.

        The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)

        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)

        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.




c)

        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.

        The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)

        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)

        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.






Date:

        July 15, 2008

        

        /s/ Steven M. CaspersExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




---
ex_232264.htm


 


Exhibit 10.18


 


2021 Cash Bonus Plan Summary


 


Target bonuses for named executive officers of AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) under the 2021 Cash Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) will range from 35% to 60% of such executive’s 2021 base salary. The target bonuses for the Company’s named executive officers for 2021 are as follows:


 


	
			Name

				
			Position

				
			Bonus %

			
	
			Vincent Angotti

				
			Chief Executive Officer

				
			60%

			
	
			Pamela Palmer, M.D., Ph.D.

				
			Chief Medical Officer

				
			40%

			
	
			Raffi Asadorian

				
			Chief Financial Officer

				
			40%

			
	
			Badri Dasu

				
			Chief Engineering Officer

				
			35%

			



 


Mr. Angotti’s cash bonus under the Plan shall be based 100% on the achievement of the 2021 corporate objectives.  The cash bonuses under the Plan for all other named executive officers shall be based 40% on the achievement of his or her individual performance goals, as determined by the Board, and 60% on the achievement of the 2021 corporate objectives. The named executive officers’ actual bonuses may exceed 100% of target in the event performance exceeds the predetermined goals.
TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF COUNTY _..

NAME OF INSTITUTION ._._..-..

PLACE OF ABODE.

Nem-
ber of

ase
vie
itation Iuclade ever

NAME

laltial, If amy.

persona living on Jan
drem bora since January

[Insert name of institution. any, PSM 06 ‘which the entries are made. See insiruciions |

——*)-— | of each person whose place of abode on
January 1, 1920, was In this famlly.

- familly Kater surname first, then the ctvem mame and middle

1, 1920. Omit
» 1vto.

{Insert proper name and, also, name of class, as towaship, town, precinct, district, hundied, beat, etc. Bee instructions.)

MERCE— (D1—5738] ?
DEPARTMENT OF COM BUREAU OF THE CENSUS | SUPERVISOR'S DISTRICT No. Z SHEET No” ‘

FOURTEENTH .CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1920—POPULATION | ENUMERATION District No. 282

NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE .. Bige Ie SOO ELT, cocanssnnaccabsaceginn

(leet jaapet aahaa anatase assie'a class, as city, vidage, town, or byriniyli See instrnciians )

ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE Ge DAY OF Sessan . 1920,

RELATION. E CITIZENSHIP. EDUCATION. NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE.

= a ae. We Tess oh Place of birth of each person and parents of each pereun eoumerated. If born Im the United States, clive the state or territory. Ifef foreicm birth, sive the place of birth
and, in additioa, the mother tomgur. (Nee instructions.)

PERSON, FATHER. MOTHER,

Relationebip of this
[ks family scat of
ef

tloa,

tlom totbeUnit-
od tates,
earofnataral-
any time slace
bept, 1, 1019,

allen,
read.

2a

Mother tongue. Place of birth. ~ Mother tongue.

Single, married,
widowed, or dl

Yearot tmmilera-
If naturalized,
| Attended school
Whether able to
Whether able to

it owned, [ree or
mortgaced, |

= | Naturaliazed or

~
-
i]
-
ri
=
~“

2

fr
Warp of city “7%

Q
Edward P. Om Shit _ ENUME

OFCTUPATION,

Tes Sc + profession, of partie. Iadustry, buslneas, or estab

rhia rigs to we fos dour, a« Iishment in which af work,

res Jatt » waleoman, labae as colton mill. dry gots
rf, ate, store, farm, elec.

wy, x4

RATOR,

Fr bauphey er ber of
ar

workipe
on oFR

= Ler ;
. PS

TRIRRA EH

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Q? «ZtnAs«- <

ines

And,

Oieetaett

<

gts c

Exe Gaaled baht, “tut Bi!

Mae
Drader Baie Meee. 4%,

itp. t<_

“bas |
ee pe. a Eola Hunk br