alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I, Beaufort J.B.  Clarke,  Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer of ICON Capital
Corp.,  the General  Partner of the Registrant in connection  with the Quarterly
Report of ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P.  Seven (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Quarterly  Report")  certify,  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of my
knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


Dated:   May 23, 2006

 /s/ Beaufort J.B. Clarke
------------------------------------------
Beaufort J.B. Clarke
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ICON Capital Corp.
General Partner of ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven
#### Ralph Edward STUDER v. STATE.

No. 36543.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Appeal dismissed without opinion. 200 So.2d 285.
c= a ; =z raisaly Recovers i} ae i j

| DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF te 273. wi-s7e) Poe

3: ~ os = pee gl dees CENSUS =i _ li DISTRICT NO... ae

i ENUMERATION DISTRICT No, a2... 2 Q. oe
; hy COUNTY Tear re he ai RT =i _|NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE Sr See suns WARD OF CITY.
; i - NAME OF INSTITUTION Re ney en ere - 5 sip = : ENUMERATED BY ME ON a OF 20. athe

b ==, | reacporazonz. | 5 -. NAME RELATION. | Toute. | PEMA DOcePIN, | CITIZENSHIP. | -RDUOATION. NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE. i

; : a ; = ae —- of each person whose of abode on la 2 taal s Place of birth of each persua aud parents of sack persun enemersiad. Lf born in the United Siatos, give the viste or Lerritery. If o€ Foreign birth, cive the place of birt

i = oe. 7 Baan ook free fiom. January 1, 1920, wan In this family. / . i 5 re § < a i : — : ant sepa iie nour nr ther factions) = m2 : 3

i lH ete pik; |foely]  Roler sursame arat, (bes ¢ ire anaemia "Pera ig ue head ot 53 # : a3 | a3 2 \5s - * PERSON. FATHER. sore. 25i | a 3 “iia finds werk bee, aa

lc HEISE 3 meee |e | laa lp ——— a

' j c z é i we dg nb titan. = s ha y j & ® afz = = a a| fi 25 Fiace of birth, Mother tongue. Place of birth. Mother tongue Place of birth. | Wether tearus. i
uy a oS, = 7/al|o| so | a | s2 | a3 | 24 7 | 18 rr fe 20 2 33 = 7 26 30

A weaned Ir. | A Load Yel Gl tate —— na Peep paca _| 3 vel Wea -

d | y, } ¥/ Pi a /P -- zi Hien pia e im. Se 2

. it ee Historic census records are maintained and released by : i er :
, weiss he National Archiv nd Records Administration ho) Zicite |
: the Nationa es and Records Ad istration, —— POEEST ATA SOEE TA dari!
t not the U.S. Census Bureau. ‘es —_—)
(Pr... _ _ ; ; — secant arte — Ses Se ee 10
Visit http:/Mwww.archives.gov for more information about publicly : ee? 1

: available records like the one shown here. oie Pe ae eet 13

.
3
SSS
x
U

oot. ¢ Va
j ‘2 |
‘ i Z / “7
/

q ie —Vraud Soe | | RIFLE!
: ANE:
n 4 RE v z 10 |
Aen. a tn | laa
God ate | s | Sas
i 2s
78
PREF 3 6|
/
Ow ZA
Nt As
atlee
Lhe ( [2 FE 3F |
oo es air
: i mr Ar
i ROT 4r5_
i ened Dae | A\5-0\
« aoe é PEAT
: i Be. 46
: a 5 AES
3 = /¢\8

is

t =
ad Se
ee ee a8 ae eae Me

Tiia¥
ee eh Se ine x
#### Nancy HEATH, Appellant, v. Dr. Saul MILLER and Helen Miller, his wife, Appellees.

No. 67-577.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 12, 1968.

Rehearing Denied April 2, 1968.

David Goldman, Miami, and Jack H. Cohen, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Da-vant, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Garring v. King Cole Northshore Hotel, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 207; Colton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Fla.App.1962, 136 So.2d 361; North Shore Hospital v. Barber, Fla.1962, 143 So.2d 849; Gordon v. Vaughan, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 474.
254 La. 119

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry COOPER.

No. 49882.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 22, 1969.

In re: Larry Cooper applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, habeas corpus and stay order.

Application denied. On the showing made relator is not entitled to the relief prayed for.
**Exhibit 4.12**

----

**PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL**

Andy GreenCEO/BT Global Services  B8A  BT Centre

17 October 2006

Dear Andy,

**Amendment to Director’s Service Contract**

From 1 October 2006, BT is operating a flexible retirement policy with no fixed    retirement age. This means that BT's contractual retirement age of 60 will    cease. BT will, however, maintain the legal right to retire people from age    65 or above under the default retirement procedure defined in the Employment    Equality (Age) Regulations 2006.

It is therefore necessary to amend your Director's    Service Contract dated 23 November 2001 to omit Paragraph 16.1.1 which provides    that the Agreement terminates when you reach the age of 60.

To acknowledge your acceptance of this variation  of your Service Contract, will you please return the enclosed duplicate of this  letter with the form of acceptance duly signed.

Yours sincerely

/s/  Larry    Stone

**L W STONE**

Accepted and Agreed

|      |   | /s/ Andy        Green |   |
|-----------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
| Signature |   |                       |   |
|      |   | Andy Green            |   |
|      |   |                  |   |
| Dated     |   | 12/11/06              |   |
|      |   |                       |   |

 

| **Larry Stone**Company Secretary      BT Group      BT Centre      81 Newgate Street      London EC1A 7AJ      United Kingdom | **tel****fax****mob****email ** | +44 (0)20 7356 5237      +44 (0)20 7356 6135      +44 (0)7740 136290    larry.stone@bt.com**** | **BT Group plc**      Registered Office:      81 Newgate Street, London EC1A 7AJ      Registered in England and Wales no. 4190816**www.bt.com** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Warren HARRIS Jr.

No. 60664.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1977.

PER CURIAM.

Writ recalled. We cannot conclude at this stage that the trial judge erred in determining that severance is not required to assure a fair determination of defendant’s guilt or innocence of each offense.

TATE and DENNIS, JJ., dissent.
#### Francisco SARALEQUI, Appellant, v. STANDARD EQUITY COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-1305.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 8, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Perry H. PARKER v. STATE of Louisiana et al.

No. 61432.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Perry H. Parker applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 353 So.2d 333.

Writ denied.

TATE and DENNIS, JJ., would grant this writ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Shelter
Properties  VII 1999 Fourth  Quarter  10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000758009
<NAME>                              Shelter Properties VII
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       474
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                180
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                    22,834
<DEPRECIATION>                            11,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            12,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                   10,728
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              12,066
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4,025
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           3,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 545
<EPS-BASIC>                                72.13 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Clifford L. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-138.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 19, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### DUNCAN v. POPULAR PUBLICATIONS, INC.

No. 36591.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 199 So.2d 794.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15986]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Notification of Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee July 31, 
2018, Public Meeting

SUMMARY: Pursuant to United States Code, the United States Mint 
announces the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (CCAC) public meeting 
scheduled for July 31, 2018.
    Date: July 31, 2018.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EST.
    Location: This meeting will occur via teleconference. Interested 
members of the public may dial in to listen to the meeting at (866) 
564-9287/Access Code: 62956028.
    Subject: Review and discussion of candidate designs for the 2018 $1 
coin that will introduce a new series of dollar coins authorized by the 
American Innovation $1 Coin Act.
    Interested persons should call the CCAC HOTLINE at (202) 354-7502 
for the latest update on meeting time and room location.
    In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 5135, the CCAC:
    [ssquf] Advises the Secretary of the Treasury on any theme or 
design proposals relating to circulating coinage, bullion coinage, 
Congressional Gold Medals, and national and other medals.
    [ssquf] Advises the Secretary of the Treasury with regard to the 
events, persons, or places to be commemorated by the issuance of 
commemorative coins in each of the five calendar years succeeding the 
year in which a commemorative coin designation is made.
    [ssquf] Makes recommendations with respect to the mintage level for 
any commemorative coin recommended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Betty Birdsong, Acting United States 
Mint Liaison to the CCAC; 801 9th Street NW, Washington, DC 20220; or 
call 202-354-7200.
    Any member of the public interested in submitting matters for the 
CCAC's consideration is invited to submit them by fax to the following 
number: 202-756-6525.

    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5135(b)(8)(C).

    Dated: July 23, 2018.
David J. Ryder,
Director, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2018-15986 Filed 7-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Susan Jean RUGGERIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-117.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth. District.

July 25, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
259 La. 902

#### Steve CHABINA v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 51790.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1971.

In re: Steve Chabina applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 251 So.2d 414.

Application denied; on the facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct.
#### Charles A. PORTER, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 71-139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 5, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
252 La. 103

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clay L. SHAW.

No. 49211.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1968.

In re: Clay L. Shaw applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus and for stay order.

Writs denied. This Court will not interfere with orderly proceedings in the trial court, in the absence of a showing of irreparable injury. Relator has a remedy by appeal in the event of conviction.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-13165) pertaining to the 1988 Stock Option Plan, 1996 Stock
Plan, 1996 Employee Purchase Plan and 1996 Directors' Stock Option Plan of
Raster Graphics, Inc. of our report dated September 25, 1998, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Raster Graphics, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.
 
  Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Raster
Graphics, Inc., listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.
 
                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
San Jose, California
October 2, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,116,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              110,320,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                   760,340
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             128,036,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    102,432,154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,567
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,346,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               128,036,870
<SALES>                                      4,577,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,577,626
<CGS>                                        1,668,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,668,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,542,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               341,367
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,271,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                   464,177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            807,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   807,461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00432-CR

Otto Ray KIETZMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013W0631

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial 

court is AFFIRMED. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

SIGNED December 23, 2014.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Video Display Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities,
particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date:
June 12, 2007
    
    /s/ Ronald D. Ordway

Ronald D. OrdwayChief Executive Officer
• 

2124/92 . SPA 9 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 71: Mining Waste Exclusion II(oontd) 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

FEDERAL 

REQUIREMENT 

FEDERAL 

RCRA 

CITATION 

ANALOGOUS 

STATE 

CITATION 

EQUIVALENT 

MORE 

STRINGENT 

BROADERIN 

SCOPE 

2124/92 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 71 

Mining Waste Exclusion II 

55 FR 2322-2354 

January 23, 1990 

(Non-HSWA Cluster VI) 

Note: This isthe second revision tothe mining waste exclusion. The first occurred at54 FR 36592 (September 1,1989) and isaddressed by Revision Checklist 65. 

FEDERAL 

REQUIREMENT 

FEDERAL 

RCRA 

CITATION 

ANALOGOUS 

STATE 

CITATION 

WAC 173·303-

STATE ANALOG IS: 

MORE 

EQUIV- STRINALENT GENT 

BROADERIN 

SCOPE 

PART 260 • HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL WAC 173-303 

SUBPART B- DEFINITIONS 

DEFINITIONS 

1 revise 'designated 

facilitv" 260.10 040 x 

PART 261 -IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 

SUBPART A- GENERAL 

EXCLUSIONS 

"§261.4(b)(7)· replaces 

·this paragraph" twice; 

'roasting, autoclaving, 

and/or chlorination" 

replaces "roasting"; 

insert "(and/or autoclaving and/or chlorination)" after 

"roasting' within existing parenthetical 

clause; semi-colons 

replace anumber of . 

commas; significant . 

revisions tolast sentence which introduces listofwastes 261.41b)(7) noanalog X 

261.4Ib)17)(i) noanalog X 

January 23, 1990 - Page 1of2 
C 

2124/92 SPA 9 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 71: Mining Waste Exclusion II(confd) 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROAD· 

FEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV· STRIN- ERIN 

REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE 

261.4(b)(7)(ji) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(iii) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(jv) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(v) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(vi) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(vii) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(viii) no analog X 

261.4(b)(7)(jx) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(x) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(xi) no analog X 

261.4(b)(7)(xii) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(xiii) noanalog X C~ 261.4(b)(7)(xiv) noanalog X 

261.4(b)(7)(xv) noanalog X 

revisions tolistof 

excluded wastes; 261.4(b)(7)(xvi) noanalog X 

(i)(A)-(E) and 

(ii)(A)-(T) are replaced 261.4(b)(7)(xvii) noanalog X 

by(i)-(xx), with 

deletion offive 261.4(b)(7)(xviii) noanalog X 

conditionally retained 

wastes and some 261.4(b)(7)(xix) noanalog X 

revisions 'in wording 

forretained wastes 261.4(b)(7)(xx) no analog X 

PART 262 - STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 

SUBPART B- THE MANIFEST 

USE OF THE MANIFEST 

add new paragraph 

stating requirements 

when shipping 

hazardous waste toa 

designated facility in 

anauthorized State 

which has-not yet 

January 23, 1990 •Page 2of2 
• 

2/24/92 SPA 9 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 71: Mining Waste Exclusion II(confd) 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV- STRIN- ERIN 

REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE 

obtained authorization
 

toregulate that
 

particular waste as .
 

hazardous 262.23(el 180(3l(f) x
 

Note that this definition inthe Federal Register (55 FR 2353, January 23,1990) and i~ the july 1,1990 CFR contains atypographical error. The reference to260.20 should be 262.20 

• 

• January 23, 1990 - Page 3of2