SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-KSB
(Mark One)
[X]   ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      OF 1934

                 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

         California                                              94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S.Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                    Issuer's telephone number (864) 239-1000

        Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

                                      None

        Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

                      Units of Limited Partnership Interest
                                (Title of class)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X  No___

Check if there is no disclosure  of delinquent  filers in response to Item 405
of  Regulation  S-B  contained  in  this  form,  and  no  disclosure  will  be
contained,  to the best of the  registrant's  knowledge in definitive proxy or
information  statements  incorporated  by  reference  in Part III of this Form
10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  [X]

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year.  $1,862,000

State the aggregate  market value of the voting  partnership  interests  held by
non-affiliates  computed  by  reference  to the price at which  the  partnership
interests  were sold,  or the average bid and asked  prices of such  partnership
interests as of December 31, 2004. No market exists for the limited  partnership
interests of the Registrant,  and,  therefore,  no aggregate market value can be
determined.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
                                      None


The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending   claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes  and   possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

                                     PART I

Item 1.     Description of Business

Consolidated  Capital  Properties VI (the  "Partnership"  or  "Registrant")  was
organized on May 23, 1984, as a limited  partnership  under  California  Uniform
Limited  Partnership  Act.  The  general  partner of the  Partnership  is ConCap
Equities,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "General  Partner" or "CEI").  The
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment  Investment and Management  Company
("AIMCO") a publicly  traded  real  estate  investment  trust.  The  Partnership
Agreement  provides  that the  Partnership  is to terminate on December 31, 2015
unless terminated prior to such date.

On December 7, 1984, the Partnership  offered $50,000,000 of Limited Partnership
Interest  (the  "Units")  pursuant to a  Registration  Statement  filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Units represent equity interests in the
Partnership   and  entitle  the  holders   thereof  to  participate  in  certain
allocations and  distributions of the  Partnership.  The sale of Units closed on
December 6, 1985,  with 181,808  Units sold at $250 each,  or gross  proceeds of
approximately  $45,452,000 to the Partnership.  Since its initial offering,  the
Partnership  has not  received,  nor are  limited  partners  required  to  make,
additional capital contributions.

The  Partnership is engaged in the business of operating and holding real estate
properties  for  investment.  By the end of fiscal  1987,  the  Partnership  had
acquired  seven  properties  and a 75%  interest  in a  joint  venture  with  an
affiliated partnership which acquired one property. The Partnership continues to
own  and  operate  one  of  these  properties.  (See  "Item  2,  Description  of
Properties".)

The Partnership  has no employees.  Management and  administrative  services are
provided by the General Partner and by agents retained by the General Partner.

Upon  the  Partnership's   formation  in  1984,  Consolidated  Capital  Equities
Corporation ("CCEC"), a Colorado corporation,  was the corporate general partner
and Consolidated Capital Group II ("CCG"), a California general partnership, was
the non-corporate  general partner.  In 1988,  through a series of transactions,
Southmark  Corporation  ("Southmark")  acquired controlling interest in CCEC. In
December  1988,  CCEC filed for  reorganization  under  Chapter 11 of the United
States  Bankruptcy  Code. In 1990, as part of CCEC's  reorganization  plan,  CEI
acquired  CCEC's general  partner  interests in the  Partnership and in 15 other
affiliated public limited  partnerships (the "Affiliated  Partnerships") and CEI
replaced CCEC as managing general partner in all 16 partnerships.  The selection
of CEI as the sole  managing  general  partner was approved by a majority of the
limited  partners in the Partnership and in each of the Affiliated  Partnerships
pursuant to a  solicitation  of the Limited  Partners  dated August 10, 1990. As
part of this  solicitation,  the Limited  Partners also approved an amendment to
the  Partnership  Agreement  limiting  changes of control of the Partnership and
approved conversion of the general partner interest of the non-corporate general
partner,  CCG, to that of a special limited partner  ("Special Limited Partner")
without  voting and without  other  rights of a limited  partner  except for the
economic  interest  previously  held  as a  general  partner.  Pursuant  to this
amendment  to the  Partnership  Agreement,  the  non-corporate  general  partner
interest  of CCG was  converted  to that of a Special  Limited  Partner  and CEI
became the sole general partner of the Partnership on December 31, 1991.

Risk Factors

The  real  estate  business  in which  the  Partnership  is  engaged  is  highly
competitive.  There are other  residential  properties within the market area of
the Partnership's  property.  The number and quality of competitive  properties,
including  those which may be managed by an affiliate of the General  Partner in
such  market  area,  could have a material  effect on the rental  market for the
apartments at the  Partnership's  property and the rents that may be charged for
such apartments. While the General Partner and its affiliates own and/or control
a  significant  number of  apartment  units in the  United  States,  such  units
represent an  insignificant  percentage of total  apartment  units in the United
States and competition for apartments is local.

Laws benefiting  disabled persons may result in the Partnership's  incurrence of
unanticipated  expenses.  Under the Americans with  Disabilities Act of 1990, or
ADA,  all places  intended to be used by the public are required to meet certain
Federal  requirements  related to access and use by disabled persons.  Likewise,
the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment  properties
first occupied after March 13, 1990 to be accessible to the  handicapped.  These
and other  Federal,  state  and  local  laws may  require  modifications  to the
Partnership's  property, or restrict renovations of the property.  Noncompliance
with these laws could result in the  imposition  of fines or an award of damages
to  private  litigants  and  also  could  result  in an  order  to  correct  any
non-complying  feature,  which could result in substantial capital expenditures.
Although  the  General  Partner  believes  that the  Partnership's  property  is
substantially in compliance with the present  requirements,  the Partnership may
incur unanticipated expenses to comply with the ADA and the FHAA.

Both the income and expenses of operating the property owned by the  Partnership
are subject to factors outside of the Partnership's  control, such as changes in
the supply and demand for  similar  properties  resulting  from  various  market
conditions, increases/decreases in unemployment or population shifts, changes in
the  availability of permanent  mortgage  financing,  changes in zoning laws, or
changes in patterns or needs of users. In addition,  there are risks inherent in
owning  and  operating  residential   properties  because  such  properties  are
susceptible  to the  impact of  economic  and other  conditions  outside  of the
control of the Partnership.

From time to time, the Federal Bureau of  Investigation,  or FBI, and the United
States  Department  of  Homeland  Security  issue  alerts  regarding   potential
terrorist threats  involving  apartment  buildings.  Threats of future terrorist
attacks,  such as those  announced  by the FBI and the  Department  of  Homeland
Security,  could  have a  negative  effect on rent and  occupancy  levels at the
Partnership's  property.  The effect that future terrorist activities or threats
of such activities could have on the  Partnership's  operations is uncertain and
unpredictable. If the Partnership were to incur a loss at a property as a result
of an act of  terrorism,  the  Partnership  could  lose all or a portion  of the
capital  invested  in the  property,  as well as the  future  revenue  from  the
property.  In this regard, the Partnership has purchased insurance to cover acts
of terrorism. The General Partner does not anticipate that these costs will have
a negative  effect on the  Partnership's  consolidated  financial  condition  or
results of operations.

There have been, and it is possible there may be other, Federal, state and local
legislation  and  regulations   enacted   relating  to  the  protection  of  the
environment.  The Partnership is unable to predict the extent,  if any, to which
such new  legislation  or  regulations  might occur and the degree to which such
existing or new legislation or regulations  might adversely  affect the property
owned by the Partnership.

The  Partnership  monitors its property for evidence of  pollutants,  toxins and
other dangerous substances, including the presence of asbestos. In certain cases
environmental testing has been performed,  which resulted in no material adverse
conditions or liabilities.  In no case has the Partnership  received notice that
it is a potentially  responsible party with respect to an environmental clean up
site.

A further  description  of the  Partnership's  business  is included in "Item 6.
Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation" included in this Form
10-KSB.

Item 2.     Description of Property

The following table sets forth the Partnership's investment property:

                           Date of
Property                   Purchase      Type of Ownership             Use

Colony of Springdale
  Apartments               02/20/87   Fee ownership subject        Apartment
  Springdale, Ohio                    to first mortgage. (1)       261 units

(1)   Property is held by a limited  partnership in which the Partnership owns a
      100% interest.

Schedule of Property

Set forth  below for the  Partnership's  property is the gross  carrying  value,
accumulated  depreciation,  depreciable life, method of depreciation and Federal
tax basis.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                            Gross
                           Carrying   Accumulated                         Federal
Property                    Value     Depreciation    Rate    Method     Tax Basis
                               (in thousands)                          (in thousands)

<S>                        <C>          <C>         <C>                   <C>
Colony of Springdale       $11,957      $ 6,538     5-30 yrs    S/L       $ 4,787
</TABLE>

See "Note A" included in "Item 7. Financial Statements" for a description of the
Partnership's capitalization and depreciation policies.

Schedule of Property Indebtedness
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                           Principal                                        Principal
                           Balance At     Stated                             Balance
                          December 31,   Interest    Period    Maturity      Due At
       Property               2004         Rate    Amortized     Date      Maturity (1)
                         (in thousands)

Colony of Springdale
<S>                          <C>           <C>       <C>       <C>            <C>
  1st mortgage               $4,873        7.79%     20 yrs    11/2019        $ --
</TABLE>

(1)   See "Item 7. Financial Statements, Note D" for information with respect to
      the  Partnership's  ability to prepay this loan and other specific details
      about the loan.

Rental Rates and Occupancy

Average annual rental rate and occupancy for 2004 and 2003 for the property:

                                       Average Annual            Average Annual
                                        Rental Rate                 Occupancy
                                         (per unit)
 Property                           2004          2003         2004        2003

 Colony of Springdale              $7,164        $7,188         88%         91%

The General Partner attributes the decrease in occupancy at Colony of Springdale
Apartments  to adhering to stricter  credit  guidelines  in acceptance of tenant
applications.

As noted under "Item 1.  Description of Business",  the real estate  industry is
highly  competitive.  The Partnership's  property is subject to competition from
other residential  apartment complexes in the area. The General Partner believes
that the property is adequately  insured.  The property is an apartment  complex
which leases units for lease terms of one year or less.  No  residential  tenant
leases  10% or more of the  available  rental  space.  The  property  is in good
physical  condition,  subject to normal  depreciation  and  deterioration  as is
typical for assets of this type and age.

Real Estate Taxes and Rates

Real estate taxes and the tax rate in 2004 for the property were:

                                    2004             2004
                                    Taxes            Rate
                                 (in thousands)

Colony of Springdale                $ 126            4.90%

Capital Improvements

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Partnership completed approximately
$639,000 in capital  improvements at the property.  The  improvements  consisted
primarily of wood siding,  roof,  air  conditioning  unit,  appliance  and floor
covering  replacements,  and structural  improvements.  These  improvements were
funded  from  operating  cash  flow  and  insurance  proceeds.  The  Partnership
regularly  evaluates the capital  improvement  needs of the property.  While the
Partnership  has  no  material   commitments  for  property   improvements   and
replacements,  certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2005.
Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property
as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Item 3.     Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group (the "Heller action") was
filed against the same  defendants  that are named in the Nuanes  action.  On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector") filed an appeal (the "Appeal") seeking to vacate and/or reverse the
order approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24,
2003,  the Objector  filed an  application  requesting  the court order AIMCO to
withdraw settlement tender offers it had commenced,  refrain from making further
offers  pending  the appeal and auction  any units  tendered  to third  parties,
contending  that the offers did not  conform  with the terms of the  settlement.
Counsel  for the  Objector  (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively
requested the court take certain action  purportedly to enforce the terms of the
settlement agreement. On December 18, 2003, the court heard oral argument on the
motions  and denied them both in their  entirety.  The  Objector  filed a second
appeal challenging the court's use of a referee and its order requiring Objector
to pay those fees.

On January 28, 2004,  the  Objector  filed his opening  brief in the Appeal.  On
April 23, 2004, the Managing General Partner and its affiliates filed a response
brief in support of the settlement and the judgment thereto. The plaintiffs have
also filed a brief in support of the settlement. On June 4, 2004, Objector filed
a reply to the briefs  submitted by the Managing General Partner and Plaintiffs.
In addition both the Objector and plaintiffs filed briefs in connection with the
second  appeal.  The Court of Appeals  heard oral  argument  on both  appeals on
September 22, 2004 and took the matters under submission.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

As previously disclosed,  AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both
affiliates  of the General  Partner,  are  defendants in an action in the United
States  District Court,  District of Columbia.  The plaintiffs have styled their
complaint as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and
seek to certify state  subclasses in California,  Maryland,  and the District of
Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed
to  compensate  maintenance  workers  for time  that they  were  required  to be
"on-call."  Additionally,  plaintiffs  allege AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  failed to
comply  with the FLSA in  compensating  maintenance  workers  for time that they
worked in responding to a call while  "on-call."  The  defendants  have filed an
answer to the amended complaint denying the substantive  allegations.  Discovery
relating  to the  certification  of the  collective  action  has  concluded  and
briefing on the matter is underway.  Although the outcome of any  litigation  is
uncertain,  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not believe that the ultimate  outcome
will have a material  adverse  effect on its  financial  condition or results of
operations.  Similarly,  the General  Partner does not believe that the ultimate
outcome  will have a  material  adverse  effect on the  Partnership's  financial
condition or results of operations.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

During the quarter ended  December 31, 2004, no matters were submitted to a vote
of the unit holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

                                     PART II

Item 5.     Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Security
            Holder Matters

The Partnership,  a publicly-held limited partnership,  offered and sold 181,808
limited partnership units (the "Units") aggregating $45,452,000. The Partnership
currently  has 2,303  holders of record  owning an aggregate  of 181,300  Units.
Affiliates of the General  Partner owned 102,000 units or 56.26% at December 31,
2004.  No public  trading  market has  developed  for the  Units,  and it is not
anticipated that such a market will develop in the future.

The  Partnership  distributed  the  following  amounts  during  the years  ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per unit data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 Per                          Per
                              Year Ended       Limited       Year Ended     Limited
                             December 31,    Partnership    December 31,  Partnership
                                 2004            Unit           2003          Unit

<S>                             <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
   Operations                   $  107          $  0.57        $   50         $ 0.26
</TABLE>

Future  cash  distributions  will  depend on the levels of cash  generated  from
operations, and the timing of the debt maturity, refinancing, and/or sale of the
property.  The  Partnership's  cash available for  distribution is reviewed on a
monthly  basis.  There can be no assurance  that the  Partnership  will generate
sufficient funds from operations  after required capital  expenditures to permit
any  distributions to its partners in 2005 or subsequent  periods.  See "Item 2.
Description of Properties - Capital  Improvements"  for information  relating to
anticipated capital expenditures at the property.

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 102,000 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 56.26% of the outstanding Units at
December  31,  2004.  A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire  additional  Units in exchange for cash or a combination
of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO,
either through private  purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 56.26% of the
outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its  affiliates  are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the  Partnership.  Although the General Partner
owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the General
Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a
result,  the  duties  of  the  General  Partner,  as  general  partner,  to  the
Partnership  and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of
the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Item 6.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

This  item  should  be read  in  conjunction  with  the  consolidated  financial
statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report.

Results of Operations

The   Partnership's   net  loss  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2004  was
approximately  $129,000  compared to net loss of approximately  $112,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2003. Net loss increased for the year ended December 31,
2004 as a result of a decrease in total revenues  partially offset by a decrease
in total expenses.

The  decrease  in  total  revenues  for the year  ended  December  31,  2004 was
primarily due to a decrease in rental income partially offset by a casualty gain
(as discussed  below).  Rental income  decreased  primarily due to a decrease in
occupancy at Colony of Springdale Apartments.

In January 2004 a pipe bomb explosion  occurred at the property which damaged 16
electrical  meters and exterior  siding.  No  apartment  units were  damaged.  A
casualty  gain of  approximately  $9,000  was  recognized  during the year ended
December  31,  2004 due to the  receipt of  approximately  $16,000 in  insurance
proceeds,  net of the write off of  undepreciated  property and  improvements of
approximately $7,000.

In April 2004 there was a fire at the property that damaged two apartment units.
A casualty gain of  approximately  $12,000 was recognized  during the year ended
December  31,  2004 due to the  receipt of  approximately  $25,000 in  insurance
proceeds,  net of the write off of  undepreciated  property and  improvements of
approximately $13,000.

Total expenses  decreased for the year ended December 31, 2004 due to a decrease
in general  and  administrative  expense,  partially  offset by an  increase  in
property tax expense. Property tax expense increased for the year ended December
31, 2004 due to a prior year tax refund  received in the fourth  quarter of 2003
at Colony of Springdale Apartments.

General and  administrative  expenses  decreased for the year ended December 31,
2004  primarily  due to a  decrease  in the  cost of  services  included  in the
management   reimbursements   to  the  General  Partner  as  allowed  under  the
Partnership Agreement and the costs associated with the annual audit required by
the  Partnership  Agreement  partially  offset  by an  increase  in the  special
management fees earned by the General  Partner for executive and  administration
management services. The fee is equal to 9% of the total distributions made from
operations to the Limited Partners.  Also included in general and administrative
expenses at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are costs  associated  with the quarterly
and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies.

The  Partnership's  financial  results depend upon a number of factors including
the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest
rates on mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred to operate the  investment  property,
general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of
the Partnership,  the General Partner monitors the rental market  environment of
its  investment   property  to  assess  the  feasibility  of  increasing  rents,
maintaining or increasing  occupancy  levels and protecting the Partnership from
increases in expenses.  As part of this plan,  the General  Partner  attempts to
protect  the  Partnership  from the  burden of  inflation-related  increases  in
expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.
However,  the  General  Partner  may use  rental  concessions  and  rental  rate
reductions  to offset  softening  market  conditions,  accordingly,  there is no
guarantee that the General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further,
a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership, such as the
local  economic  climate and weather,  can  adversely or  positively  affect the
Partnership's financial results.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  December  31,  2004,  the  Partnership  had  cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately  $60,000 compared to approximately  $243,000 at December 31, 2003.
Cash  and  cash  equivalents   decreased  by   approximately   $183,000  due  to
approximately  $587,000 of cash used in investing activities partially offset by
approximately  $310,000 and $94,000 of cash  provided by operating and financing
activities,  respectively.  Cash  used  in  investing  activities  consisted  of
property  improvements and replacements  partially offset by insurance  proceeds
received.  Cash provided by financing  activities  consisted of advances from an
affiliate   partially  offset  by  principal   payments  made  on  the  mortgage
indebtedness   encumbering  the  Partnership's  property  and  distributions  to
partners.  The  Partnership  invests  its working  capital  reserves in interest
bearing accounts.

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Partnership  received advances from
an  affiliate of the General  Partner of  approximately  $354,000.  Interest was
charged at the prime rate plus 2% (7.25% at December  31,  2004) and amounted to
approximately $3,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004,
the amount of outstanding loans and accrued interest was approximately  $357,000
and is  included  in due to  affiliate.  There  were no loans  from the  General
Partner or associated interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2003.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  General  Partner  monitors
developments in the area of legal and regulatory  compliance.  For example,  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests  additional  compliance measures
with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these
changes,  the Partnership  expects that it will incur higher expenses related to
compliance.

The  Partnership  regularly  evaluates  the  capital  improvement  needs  of the
property.  While  the  Partnership  has no  material  commitments  for  property
improvements  and  replacements,   certain  routine  capital   expenditures  are
anticipated  during 2005. Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical
condition  of the  property as well as  anticipated  cash flow  generated by the
property.  Capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from
operations or from Partnership reserves. To the extent that capital improvements
are  completed,  the  Partnership's  distributable  cash  flow,  if any,  may be
adversely affected at least in the short term.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient  for any near term needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness  encumbering the Partnership's property of approximately $4,873,000
matures in November  2019 at which time the  mortgage is  scheduled  to be fully
amortized.

The  Partnership  distributed  the  following  amounts  during  the years  ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per unit data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 Per                          Per
                              Year Ended       Limited       Year Ended     Limited
                             December 31,    Partnership    December 31,  Partnership
                                 2004            Unit           2003          Unit

<S>                             <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
   Operations                   $  107          $  0.57        $   50         $ 0.26
</TABLE>

Future  cash  distributions  will  depend on the levels of cash  generated  from
operations, and the timing of the debt maturity,  refinancing and/or sale of the
property.  The  Partnership's  cash available for  distribution is reviewed on a
monthly  basis.  There can be no assurance  that the  Partnership  will generate
sufficient funds from operations, after required capital expenditures, to permit
any distributions to its partners during 2005 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 102,000 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 56.26% of the outstanding Units at
December  31,  2004.  A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire  additional  Units in exchange for cash or a combination
of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO,
either through private  purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 56.26% of the
outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its  affiliates  are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the  Partnership.  Although the General Partner
owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the General
Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a
result,  the  duties  of  the  General  Partner,  as  general  partner,  to  the
Partnership  and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of
the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

A summary of the Partnership's  significant  accounting  policies is included in
"Note A - Organization and Significant Accounting Policies" which is included in
the consolidated  financial  statements in "Item 7. Financial  Statements".  The
General  Partner  believes that the  consistent  application  of these  policies
enables the  Partnership  to provide  readers of the financial  statements  with
useful and reliable  information about the  Partnership's  operating results and
financial  condition.  The preparation of consolidated  financial  statements in
conformity with accounting  principles  generally  accepted in the United States
requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions.  These estimates and
assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial  statements  as well as reported  amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting  period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Judgments  and  assessments  of  uncertainties  are  required  in  applying  the
Partnership's  accounting policies in many areas. The Partnership believes that,
of its  significant  accounting  policies,  the  following  may involve a higher
degree of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  property.  These factors include, but are not limited
to,  changes  in the  national,  regional  and  local  economic  climate;  local
conditions,  such as an oversupply of multifamily  properties;  competition from
other available  multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response  to heavy  competition  from other  similar  complexes  in the area.
Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a
straight-line  basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership  evaluates all
accounts  receivable  from  residents and  establishes  an allowance,  after the
application of security deposits,  for accounts greater than 30 days past due on
current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

Item 7.     Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI

LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

      Consolidated Balance Sheet - December 31, 2004

      Consolidated  Statements of  Operations - Years ended  December 31, 2004
      and 2003

      Consolidated  Statements  of Changes in Partners'  (Deficiency)  Capital -
      Years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003

      Consolidated  Statements  of Cash Flows - Years ended  December 31, 2004
      and 2003

      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

              Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Partners
Consolidated Capital Properties VI


We have audited the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet of  Consolidated
Capital  Properties  VI as of December  31, 2004,  and the related  consolidated
statements of operations,  changes in partners'  (deficiency)  capital, and cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended  December  31,  2004.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion on these financial  statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance  with the standards of the Public  Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as a basis  for  designing  audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes  examining,  on a test  basis,  evidence  supporting  the  amounts  and
disclosures in the financial  statements,  assessing the  accounting  principles
used and  significant  estimates made by management,  and evaluating the overall
financial  statement  presentation.   We  believe  that  our  audits  provide  a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly, in
all material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial  position of  Consolidated
Capital Properties VI at December 31, 2004, and the consolidated  results of its
operations  and its cash  flows  for each of the two years in the  period  ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting  principles  generally accepted
in the United States.


                                                          /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Greenville, South Carolina
March 10, 2005


<PAGE>



                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                December 31, 2004

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                           <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                  $ 60
   Receivables and deposits                                                      26
   Other assets                                                                 130
   Investment property (Notes D and E):
      Land                                                     $ 916
      Buildings and personal property                          11,041
                                                               11,957
      Less accumulated depreciation                            (6,538)        5,419

                                                                            $ 5,635
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                           $ 40
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           85
   Accrued property taxes                                                       126
   Other liabilities                                                            127
   Due to affiliates (Note B)                                                   414
   Mortgage note payable (Note D)                                             4,873

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
   General partner                                              $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                       (79)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                                 51           (30)

                                                                            $ 5,635

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           Years Ended December 31,
                                                              2004         2003
Revenues:
<S>                                                          <C>          <C>
   Rental income                                             $ 1,610      $ 1,674
   Other income                                                  231          243
   Casualty gains (Note G)                                        21           --
      Total revenues                                           1,862        1,917

Expenses:
   Operating                                                     852          853
   General and administrative                                    149          194
   Depreciation                                                  467          472
   Interest                                                      397          405
   Property taxes                                                126          105
      Total expenses                                           1,991        2,029

Net loss (Note F)                                            $ (129)      $ (112)

Net loss allocated to special limited
  partners                                                        --           --
Net loss allocated to limited partners                          (129)        (112)
                                                             $ (129)      $ (112)

Net loss per limited partnership unit                        $ (0.71)     $ (0.62)

Distribution per limited partnership unit                    $ 0.57       $ 0.26

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



<PAGE>


                      CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                     Limited                 Special
                                   Partnership   General     Limited    Limited
                                      Units      Partner    Partners    Partners    Total

Original capital
<S>                                  <C>           <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
   contributions                     181,808       $ 1        $ --      $45,452    $45,453

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at December 31, 2002              181,300          (2)        (73)       443        368

Distributions paid to partners            --          --         (2)        (48)        (50)

Net loss for the year
  ended December 31, 2003                 --          --         --        (112)      (112)

Partners' (deficiency) capital
  at December 31, 2003               181,300          (2)       (75)        283         206

Distributions paid to partners            --          --         (4)       (103)       (107)

Net loss for the year
  ended December 31, 2004                 --          --         --        (129)      (129)

Partners' (deficiency) capital
  at December 31, 2004               181,300      $ (2)       $ (79)      $ 51       $ (30)

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                              Years Ended December 31,
                                                                   2004         2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                               <C>          <C>
  Net loss                                                        $ (129)      $ (112)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                    467          472
     Amortization of loan costs                                        6            5
     Casualty gains                                                  (21)          --
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                        --           (1)
      Other assets                                                    (9)         (17)
      Accounts payable                                               (50)          40
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            (13)          23
      Accrued taxes                                                    2          (11)
      Other liabilities                                               85          (68)
      Due to Affiliates                                              (28)          88

        Net cash provided by operating activities                    310          419

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                            (628)        (136)
  Insurance proceeds received                                         41           --

        Net cash used in investing activities                       (587)        (136)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                 (153)        (168)
  Advances from affiliate                                            354           --
  Distributions paid to partners                                    (107)         (50)

        Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities           94         (218)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents                (183)          65

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year                       243          178

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year                           $ 60        $ 243

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                          $ 354        $ 434

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow information:
  Property improvements and replacements included in
    accounts payable                                               $ 11         $ --

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                December 31, 2004


Note A - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization:   Consolidated   Capital   Properties  VI,  a  California  limited
partnership (the "Partnership" or "Registrant"),  was formed on May 23, 1984, to
acquire and operate commercial and residential  properties.  The general partner
of the Partnership is ConCap  Equities,  Inc. (the "General  Partner" or "CEI").
The General  Partner is a subsidiary  of  Apartment  Investment  and  Management
Company  ("AIMCO"),   a  publicly  traded  real  estate  investment  trust.  The
Partnership  Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December
31, 2015 unless  terminated  prior to such date.  The  Partnership  operates one
apartment property located in Ohio.

At the  time  of the  Partnership's  formation,  Consolidated  Capital  Equities
Corporation ("CCEC"), a Colorado corporation,  was the corporate general partner
and Consolidated Capital Group II ("CCG"), a California general partnership, was
the non-corporate  general partner.  In 1988,  through a series of transactions,
Southmark  Corporation  ("Southmark")  acquired controlling interest in CCEC. In
December  1988,  CCEC filed for  reorganization  under  Chapter 11 of the United
States  Bankruptcy  Code. In 1990, as part of CCEC's  reorganization  plan,  CEI
acquired  CCEC's general  partner  interests in the  Partnership and in 15 other
affiliated public limited  partnerships (the "Affiliated  Partnerships") and CEI
replaced CCEC as managing general partner in all 16 partnerships.  The selection
of CEI as the sole  managing  general  partner was approved by a majority of the
Limited  Partners in the Partnership and in each of the Affiliated  Partnerships
pursuant to a  solicitation  of the Limited  Partners  dated August 10, 1990. As
part of this  solicitation,  the Limited  Partners also approved an amendment to
the Partnership Agreement to limit changes of control of the Partnership.

Consolidation:  The Partnership's  financial  statements include the accounts of
Colony of Springdale  Associates,  Ltd.,  which holds fee title to the Colony of
Springdale  Apartments.  The  results  of its  operations  are  included  in the
Partnership's    consolidated   financial   statements.   All   interpartnership
transactions have been eliminated.

Uses of Estimates:  The  preparation of financial  statements in conformity with
accounting   principles   generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the financial  statements and  accompanying  notes.  Actual results could differ
from those estimates.

Investment  Property:  Investment property consists of one apartment complex and
is stated at cost.  Acquisition  fees are  capitalized as a cost of real estate.
The  Partnership  capitalizes  all  expenditures  in excess of $250 that clearly
relate  to the  acquisition  and  installation  of real  and  personal  property
components.  These  expenditures  include  costs  incurred  to replace  existing
property components, costs incurred to add a material new feature to a property,
and costs that  increase  the useful  life or  service  potential  of a property
component.  These  capitalized costs are depreciated over the useful life of the
asset.  Expenditures for ordinary  repairs,  maintenance and apartment  turnover
costs are expensed as incurred.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144,
"Accounting  for  the  Impairment  or  Disposal  of  Long-Lived   Assets",   the
Partnership  records  impairment  losses on long-lived assets used in operations
when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the
undiscounted  cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than
the carrying  amounts of those assets.  No  adjustments  for impairment of value
were recorded in the years ended December 31, 2004 or 2003.

Depreciation:  Depreciation  is  provided by the  straight-line  method over the
estimated lives of the apartment  property and related  personal  property.  For
Federal income tax purposes,  the  accelerated  cost recovery method is used for
real property over 19 years for additions  after May 8, 1985, and before January
1, 1987. As a result of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, for additions after December
31, 1986, the modified accelerated cost recovery method is used for depreciation
of (1) real property over 27 1/2 years and (2) personal property  additions over
5 years.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in
banks.  At certain times,  the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the
limit on  insured  deposits.  Cash  balances  include  approximately  $57,000 at
December 31, 2004 that are  maintained  by an affiliated  management  company on
behalf of affiliated entities in cash concentration accounts.

Deferred  Costs:   Loan  costs  of   approximately   $121,000  less  accumulated
amortization  of  approximately  $31,000 are included in other assets.  The loan
costs are  amortized  over the term of the related  loan  balance.  Amortization
expense of  approximately  $6,000 and $5,000 is included in interest  expense at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Amortization expense is expected to be
approximately $6,000 for each of the years 2005 through 2009.

Leasing   commissions  and  other  direct  costs  incurred  in  connection  with
successful  leasing  efforts are  deferred and  amortized  over the terms of the
related leases. Amortization of these costs is included in operating expenses.

Tenant  Security  Deposits:  The  Partnership  requires  security  deposits from
lessees for the duration of the lease.  Deposits  are  refunded  when the tenant
vacates,  provided  the tenant has not  damaged  its space and is current on its
rental payments.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value
of  Financial  Instruments",  as amended  by SFAS No.  119,  "Disclosures  about
Derivative  Financial  Instruments  and Fair  Value of  Financial  Instruments",
requires  disclosure  of fair value  information  about  financial  instruments,
whether or not recognized in the balance  sheet,  for which it is practicable to
estimate  fair  value.  Fair value is defined in the SFAS as the amount at which
the  instruments  could be exchanged in a current  transaction  between  willing
parties,  other than in a forced or liquidation  sale. The Partnership  believes
that the  carrying  amount of its  financial  instruments  (except for long term
debt)  approximates  their fair value due to the short  term  maturity  of these
instruments.  The Partnership  estimates the fair value of its long term debt by
discounting  future  cash flows  using a discount  rate  commensurate  with that
currently  believed to be available to the Partnership  for similar term,  fully
amortizing long-term debt. The fair value of the Partnership's long term debt at
the Partnership's incremental borrowing rate is approximately $5,360,000.

Leases: The Partnership  generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms
or less. The Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow
months or in response to heavy  competition from other similar  complexes in the
area.  Rental  income  attributable  to  leases,  net  of  any  concessions,  is
recognized on a straight-line  basis over the term of the lease. The Partnership
evaluates all accounts  receivable  from residents and establishes an allowance,
after the application of security  deposits,  for accounts  greater than 30 days
past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

Allocation  of  Profits,  Gains and  Losses:  Profits,  gains and  losses of the
Partnership  are allocated  between  general and limited  partners in accordance
with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement.

The  Partnership  Agreement,  as amended,  provides  net income and losses to be
allocated to the general partner,  special limited partners and limited partners
at 0.2%, 3.8% and 96%, respectively. At no time shall net losses be allocated to
the special limited  partners if such allocation  would make the capital balance
negative  or make a  negative  balance  larger.  In the event that a loss is not
allocated  to the  special  limited  partners,  it is  allocated  to the limited
partners.  In the  years  ended  December  31,  2004 and 2003,  the  Partnership
recognized  a net loss and the special  limited  partners'  capital  balance was
negative, so the net losses were allocated 0.2% to the general partner and 99.8%
to the limited partners.

Segment Reporting: SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and
Related  Information"  established  standards  for the way that public  business
enterprises  report  information  about operating  segments in annual  financial
statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about
operating segments in interim financial reports.  It also established  standards
for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major
customers.  As defined in SFAS No. 131, the  Partnership has only one reportable
segment.

Advertising Costs: The Partnership expenses the cost of advertising as incurred.
Advertising costs of approximately  $54,000 in 2004 and approximately $50,000 in
2003 were charged to expense as incurred and are included in operating expenses.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The  Partnership  has no  employees  and depends on the General  Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates  of the  General  Partner  receive  5% of  gross  receipts  from  the
Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing  property  management
services.  The  Partnership  paid to such affiliates  approximately  $90,000 and
$96,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,  respectively,  which is
included in operating expenses.

An affiliate of the General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting to  approximately  $155,000 and
$136,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively,  which is
included in general and administrative expenses and investment property. For the
year ended  December 31, 2003 the first three  quarters  were based on estimated
amounts  and  in  the  fourth  quarter,   the   reimbursements   of  accountable
administrative  expenses were adjusted based on actual costs (see "Note C"). The
portion of these  reimbursements  included in investment  property for the years
ended  December  31, 2004 and 2003 are fees related to  construction  management
services  provided  by an  affiliate  of the  General  Partner of  approximately
$57,000 and $4,000,  respectively.  The construction management service fees are
calculated  based on a percentage  of current year  additions to the  investment
property.  Approximately  $57,000  of the  accountable  administrative  expenses
remain unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and are included in due to affiliates.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administration  management
services.  The General Partner earned approximately $9,000 and $4,000 during the
years  ended  December  31,  2004 and 2003,  respectively,  which is included in
general and administrative expenses.

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Partnership  received advances from
an  affiliate of the General  Partner of  approximately  $354,000.  Interest was
charged at the prime rate plus 2% (7.25% at December  31,  2004) and amounted to
approximately $3,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004,
the amount of outstanding loans and accrued interest was approximately  $357,000
and is  included  in due to  affiliate.  There  were no loans  from the  General
Partner or associated interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2003.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General
Partner.  During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership was
charged  by  AIMCO  and  its  affiliates   approximately  $24,000  and  $21,000,
respectively,  for  insurance  coverage and fees  associated  with policy claims
administration.

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 102,000 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 56.26% of the outstanding Units at
December  31,  2004.  A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire  additional  Units in exchange for cash or a combination
of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO,
either through private  purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 56.26% of the
outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its  affiliates  are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the  Partnership.  Although the General Partner
owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the General
Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a
result,  the  duties  of  the  General  Partner,  as  general  partner,  to  the
Partnership  and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of
the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Note C - Fourth Quarter Adjustment

The Partnership's  policy is to record management  reimbursements to the General
Partner as allowed under the Partnership  Agreement on a quarterly basis,  using
estimated  financial  information  furnished  by an  affiliate  of  the  General
Partner.  For  the  first  three  quarters  of  2003,  these  reimbursements  of
accountable  administrative expenses were based on estimated amounts. During the
fourth  quarter of 2003,  the  Partnership  recorded an adjustment to management
reimbursements  to  the  General  Partner  of  approximately  $88,000  due  to a
difference  in the  estimated  costs and the actual costs  incurred.  The actual
management reimbursements to the General Partner for the year ended December 31,
2003  were  approximately  $130,000  as  compared  to the  estimated  management
reimbursements  to the General  Partner for the nine months ended  September 30,
2003 of approximately  $32,000. The adjustment to management  reimbursements was
included in general and administrative expenses.

Note D - Mortgage Note Payable

The principal terms of the mortgage note payable are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                          Principal    Monthly                           Principal
                         Balance At    Payment     Stated                 Balance
                        December 31,  Including   Interest  Maturity       Due At
       Property             2004       Interest     Rate      Date        Maturity
                             (in thousands)
Colony of Springdale
<S>                        <C>           <C>       <C>       <C>            <C>
  1st mortgage             $4,873        $ 46      7.79%     11/2019        $ --
</TABLE>

The mortgage note payable is a fixed rate mortgage that is  non-recourse  and is
secured  by a pledge of the  Partnership's  rental  property  and by a pledge of
revenues from the respective rental property. The mortgage note payable includes
a prepayment penalty if repaid prior to maturity.  Further, the property may not
be sold subject to existing indebtedness.

Scheduled principal payments of the mortgage note payable subsequent to December
31, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):

                             2005                   180
                             2006                   195
                             2007                   210
                             2008                   227
                             2009                   246
                          Thereafter              3,815
                             Total               $4,873

Note E - Investment Property and Accumulated Depreciation

                                               Initial Cost
                                              To Partnership
                                              (in thousands)
                                                     Buildings          Cost
                                                    and Related     Capitalized
                                                      Personal     Subsequent to
      Description         Encumbrance      Land       Property      Acquisition
                         (in thousands)                           (in thousands)
Colony of Springdale
  Springdale, Ohio           $4,873        $ 909       $8,358          $2,690

                          Gross Amount At Which Carried
                              At December 31, 2004
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    Buildings
                                   And Related
                                   Personal             Accumulated     Date    Depreciable
      Description         Land     Property    Total    Depreciation  Acquired   Life-Years
                                                       (in thousands)
Colony of Springdale
<S>                      <C>       <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>  <C>     <C>
  Springdale, Ohio       $ 916     $11,041    $11,957     $ 6,538      2/20/87      5-30
</TABLE>

Reconciliation of "Investment Property and Accumulated Depreciation"

                                                Years Ended December 31,
                                                  2004            2003
                                                     (in thousands)
Investment Property
Balance at beginning of year                    $11,392          $11,256
  Property improvements                             639              136
  Disposals of property                             (74)              --
Balance at end of year                          $11,957          $11,392

Accumulated Depreciation
Balance at beginning of year                    $ 6,125          $ 5,653
  Additions charged to expense                      467              472
  Disposals of property                             (54)              --
Balance at end of year                          $ 6,538          $ 6,125

The aggregate cost of the investment property for Federal income tax purposes at
December  31,  2004 and 2003,  is  approximately  $11,113,000  and  $10,523,000,
respectively. The accumulated depreciation taken for Federal income tax purposes
at December  31, 2004 and 2003,  is  approximately  $6,326,000  and  $5,891,000,
respectively.

Note F - Income Taxes

Taxable income or loss of the  Partnership is reported in the income tax returns
of its  partners.  Accordingly,  no  provision  for income  taxes is made in the
consolidated financial statements of the Partnership.

The  following  is a  reconciliation  of reported  net loss and Federal  taxable
(loss) income (in thousands, except per unit data):

                                                     2004          2003
Net loss as reported                                $ (129)       $ (112)
Add (deduct):
   Depreciation differences                             32            20
   Unearned income                                       1             4
   Other                                              (137)          103
   Accruals and prepaids                               (18)           (6)
Federal taxable (loss) income                       $ (251)         $ 9
Federal taxable (loss) income per limited
   partnership unit                                 $(1.38)        $ .05

The following is a reconciliation between the Partnership's reported amounts and
Federal tax basis of net assets and liabilities (in thousands):

Net liabilities as reported                     $ (30)
Land and buildings                               (844)
Accumulated depreciation                          212
Syndication costs                               4,989
Other                                             298

      Net assets - Federal tax basis            $4,625

Note G - Casualty Events

In January 2004 a pipe bomb explosion  occurred at the property which damaged 16
electrical  meters and exterior  siding.  No  apartment  units were  damaged.  A
casualty  gain of  approximately  $9,000  was  recognized  during the year ended
December  31,  2004 due to the  receipt of  approximately  $16,000 in  insurance
proceeds,  net of the write off of  undepreciated  property and  improvements of
approximately $7,000.

In April 2004 there was a fire at the property that damaged two apartment units.
A casualty gain of  approximately  $12,000 was recognized  during the year ended
December  31,  2004 due to the  receipt of  approximately  $25,000 in  insurance
proceeds,  net of the write off of  undepreciated  property and  improvements of
approximately  $13,000.  Subsequent  to December 31, 2004  additional  insurance
proceeds of approximately  $21,000 were received related to this casualty and an
additional gain of $21,000 was recorded during the first quarter of 2005.

Note H - Subsequent Event

Subsequent to December 31, 2004, the General Partner advanced to the Partnership
approximately  $212,000 to cover  expenses  related to capital  expenditures  at
Colony of Springdale Apartments. Interest will be charged at prime plus 2%.

Note I - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group (the "Heller action") was
filed against the same  defendants  that are named in the Nuanes  action.  On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector") filed an appeal (the "Appeal") seeking to vacate and/or reverse the
order approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24,
2003,  the Objector  filed an  application  requesting  the court order AIMCO to
withdraw settlement tender offers it had commenced,  refrain from making further
offers  pending  the appeal and auction  any units  tendered  to third  parties,
contending  that the offers did not  conform  with the terms of the  settlement.
Counsel  for the  Objector  (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively
requested the court take certain action  purportedly to enforce the terms of the
settlement agreement. On December 18, 2003, the court heard oral argument on the
motions  and denied them both in their  entirety.  The  Objector  filed a second
appeal challenging the court's use of a referee and its order requiring Objector
to pay those fees.

On January 28, 2004,  the  Objector  filed his opening  brief in the Appeal.  On
April 23, 2004, the Managing General Partner and its affiliates filed a response
brief in support of the settlement and the judgment thereto. The plaintiffs have
also filed a brief in support of the settlement. On June 4, 2004, Objector filed
a reply to the briefs  submitted by the Managing General Partner and Plaintiffs.
In addition both the Objector and plaintiffs filed briefs in connection with the
second  appeal.  The Court of Appeals  heard oral  argument  on both  appeals on
September 22, 2004 and took the matters under submission.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

As previously disclosed,  AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both
affiliates  of the General  Partner,  are  defendants in an action in the United
States  District Court,  District of Columbia.  The plaintiffs have styled their
complaint as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and
seek to certify state  subclasses in California,  Maryland,  and the District of
Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed
to  compensate  maintenance  workers  for time  that they  were  required  to be
"on-call."  Additionally,  plaintiffs  allege AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  failed to
comply  with the FLSA in  compensating  maintenance  workers  for time that they
worked in responding to a call while  "on-call."  The  defendants  have filed an
answer to the amended complaint denying the substantive  allegations.  Discovery
relating  to the  certification  of the  collective  action  has  concluded  and
briefing on the matter is underway.  Although the outcome of any  litigation  is
uncertain,  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not believe that the ultimate  outcome
will have a material  adverse  effect on its  financial  condition or results of
operations.  Similarly,  the General  Partner does not believe that the ultimate
outcome  will have a  material  adverse  effect on the  Partnership's  financial
condition or results of operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Environmental

Various  Federal,  state and local laws subject  property owners or operators to
liability for management,  and the costs of removal or  remediation,  of certain
hazardous  substances  present on a property.  Such laws often impose  liability
without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for,
the release or presence of the  hazardous  substances.  The  presence of, or the
failure to manage or remedy properly,  hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected  apartment  communities and the ability to sell or finance
affected properties.  In addition to the costs associated with investigation and
remediation  actions brought by government  agencies,  the presence of hazardous
substances  on a  property  could  result in claims by  private  plaintiffs  for
personal injury,  disease,  disability or other  infirmities.  Various laws also
impose  liability for the cost of removal,  remediation or disposal of hazardous
substances  through a  licensed  disposal  or  treatment  facility.  Anyone  who
arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous  substances  is  potentially
liable  under such laws.  These laws often impose  liability  whether or not the
person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal  facility.
In connection with the ownership and operation of its property,  the Partnership
could  potentially be liable for  environmental  liabilities or costs associated
with its property.

Mold

The Partnership is aware of lawsuits  against owners and managers of multifamily
properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the
presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial  monetary judgments
or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property
damage loss claims  arising from the  presence of mold and for  personal  injury
claims  related  to  mold  exposure.  Affiliates  of the  General  Partner  have
implemented a national  policy and  procedures to prevent or eliminate mold from
its  properties  and the  General  Partner  believes  that these  measures  will
eliminate,  or at least minimize, the effects that mold could have on residents.
To date,  the  Partnership  has not incurred any material  costs or  liabilities
relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law
regarding  mold is unsettled and subject to change the General  Partner can make
no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold
will  not have a  material  adverse  effect  on the  Partnership's  consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.

As  previously  disclosed,  the  Central  Regional  Office of the United  States
Securities  and  Exchange   Commission   (the  "SEC")  is  conducting  a  formal
investigation relating to certain matters.  Although the staff of the SEC is not
limited  in the  areas  that it may  investigate,  AIMCO  believes  the areas of
investigation include AIMCO's miscalculated monthly net rental income figures in
third quarter 2003,  forecasted  guidance,  accounts payable,  rent concessions,
vendor  rebates,  capitalization  of payroll and certain  other  costs,  and tax
credit  transactions.  AIMCO is cooperating  fully. AIMCO is not able to predict
when the matter  will be  resolved.  AIMCO does not  believe  that the  ultimate
outcome  will  have a  material  adverse  effect on its  consolidated  financial
condition  or results of  operations.  Similarly,  the General  Partner does not
believe that the ultimate  outcome  will have a material  adverse  effect on the
Partnership's consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

<PAGE>

Item 8.     Changes in and  Disagreements  with  Accountants on Accounting and
            Financial Disclosure

            None.

Item 8a.    Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the General Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's  principal
executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has evaluated
the  effectiveness of the Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures (as
such term is defined  in Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e)  under the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  as amended  (the  "Exchange  Act")) as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive
officer and  principal  financial  officer of the General  Partner,  who are the
equivalent  of the  Partnership's  principal  executive  officer  and  principal
financial  officer,  respectively,  have  concluded  that, as of the end of such
period, the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fourth quarter of 2004 that have materially  affected,  or are reasonably likely
to  materially  affect,  the  Partnership's   internal  control  over  financial
reporting.

Item 8b.    Other Information

            None.
                                    PART III

Item 9.     Directors,  Executive  Officers,  Promoters  and Control  Persons;
            Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Consolidated  Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or the "Registrant") has
no officers or directors. ConCap Equities, Inc. (the "General Partner" or "CEI")
manages  and  controls  the  Partnership  and  has  general  responsibility  and
authority in all matters affecting its business.

The name of the directors and officers of the General Partner, their age and the
nature of all  positions  with CEI  presently  held by them are set forth below.
There are no family relationships between or among any officers or directors.

Martha L. Long                   45   Director and Senior Vice President
Harry G. Alcock                  42   Director and Executive Vice President
Miles Cortez                     61   Executive Vice President, General Counsel
                                       and Secretary
Patti K. Fielding                41   Executive Vice President
Paul J. McAuliffe                48   Executive Vice President and Chief
                                      Financial Officer
Thomas M. Herzog                 42   Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting
                                       Officer
Stephen B. Waters                43   Vice President

Martha L. Long has been a Director  and Senior  Vice  President  of the  General
Partner since February 2004. Ms. Long has been with AIMCO since October 1998 and
has served in various  capacities.  From 1998 to 2001, Ms. Long served as Senior
Vice President and Controller of AIMCO and the General Partner.  During 2002 and
2003,  Ms. Long served as Senior Vice  President of Continuous  Improvement  for
AIMCO.

Harry G. Alcock was  appointed  as a Director of the General  Partner in October
2004 and was  appointed  Executive  Vice  President  of the  General  Partner in
February 2004 and has been Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
of AIMCO since October  1999.  Prior to October 1999 Mr. Alcock served as a Vice
President  of AIMCO  from July 1996 to October  1997,  when he was  promoted  to
Senior Vice  President-Acquisitions  where he served  until  October  1999.  Mr.
Alcock has had responsibility for acquisition and financing  activities of AIMCO
since July 1994.

Miles  Cortez was  appointed  Executive  Vice  President,  General  Counsel  and
Secretary of the General  Partner in February  2004 and of AIMCO in August 2001.
Prior to joining  AIMCO,  Mr. Cortez was the senior  partner of Cortez  Macaulay
Bernhardt  &  Schuetze  LLC,  a Denver  law firm,  from  December  1997  through
September 2001.

Patti K. Fielding was appointed  Executive  Vice President - Securities and Debt
of the General  Partner in  February  2004 and of AIMCO in  February  2003.  Ms.
Fielding was  appointed  Treasurer  of AIMCO in January  2005.  Ms.  Fielding is
responsible  for  debt  financing  and the  treasury  department.  Ms.  Fielding
previously  served as Senior Vice  President - Securities and Debt of AIMCO from
January 2000 to February 2003. Ms.  Fielding  joined AIMCO in February 1997 as a
Vice President.

Paul J. McAuliffe has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer
of the General  Partner since April 2002. Mr.  McAuliffe has served as Executive
Vice  President of AIMCO since February 1999 and was appointed  Chief  Financial
Officer  of AIMCO in October  1999.  From May 1996  until he joined  AIMCO,  Mr.
McAuliffe was Senior Managing Director of Secured Capital Corp.

Thomas M.  Herzog was  appointed  Senior  Vice  President  and Chief  Accounting
Officer of the General  Partner in February  2004 and of AIMCO in January  2004.
Prior to  joining  AIMCO in January  2004,  Mr.  Herzog  was at GE Real  Estate,
serving  as Chief  Accounting  Officer & Global  Controller  from  April 2002 to
January 2004 and as Chief Technical Advisor from March 2000 to April 2002. Prior
to joining GE Real  Estate,  Mr.  Herzog was at  Deloitte & Touche LLP from 1990
until 2000.

Stephen B. Waters was appointed Vice  President of the General  Partner in April
2004. Mr. Waters previously served as a Director of Real Estate Accounting since
joining AIMCO in September 1999. Mr. Waters has responsibilities for real estate
and partnership accounting with AIMCO.

One or more of the above persons are also directors and/or officers of a general
partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited  partnerships which
either have a class of  securities  registered  pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of
Section  15(d) of such Act.  Further,  one or more of the above persons are also
directors and/or officers of Apartment Investment and Management Company and the
general  partner  of  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P.,  entities  that  have a class of
securities  registered  pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or are subject to the reporting  requirements of Section 15 (d) of such
Act.

The board of  directors of the General  Partner  does not have a separate  audit
committee.  As such, the board of directors of the General Partner  fulfills the
functions of an audit  committee.  The board of directors  has  determined  that
Martha L. Long meets the requirement of an "audit committee financial expert".

The  directors  and  officers of the General  Partner  with  authority  over the
Partnership are all employees of subsidiaries of AIMCO. AIMCO has adopted a code
of ethics that applies to such  directors and officers that is posted on AIMCO's
website  (www.AIMCO.com).  AIMCO's  website is not  incorporated by reference to
this filing.

Item 10.    Executive Compensation

Neither the  directors  nor the  officers of the General  Partner  received  any
remuneration from the Partnership.

Item 11.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Except as provided below, as of December 31, 2004, no person was known to CEI to
own of  record  or  beneficially  more  than  five  percent  of the Units of the
Partnership.

Entity                                       Number            Percent
                                            of Units          of Total

AIMCO IPLP, LP                               42,480            23.43%
   (an affiliate of AIMCO)
AIMCO Properties, LP                         59,520            32.83%
   (an affiliate of AIMCO)

AIMCO IPLP, L.P is indirectly ultimately owned by AIMCO. Its business address is
55 Beattie Place, Greenville, SC 29602.

AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. is indirectly  ultimately  controlled  by AIMCO.  Its
business address is 4582 S. Ulster St. Parkway,  Suite 1100, Denver,  Colorado
80237.

No director or officer of the General Partner owns any Units.

As of December  31,  2004,  the  following  persons  were known to CEI to be the
beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of its common stock:

                                         Number of            Percent
     Name and Address                    CEI Shares           Of Total
     Insignia Properties Trust            100,000               100%
     55 Beattie Place
     Greenville, SC  29602

Insignia Properties Trust is an affiliate of AIMCO.

Item 12.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The  Partnership  has no  employees  and depends on the General  Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates  of the  General  Partner  receive  5% of  gross  receipts  from  the
Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing  property  management
services.  The  Partnership  paid to such affiliates  approximately  $90,000 and
$96,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,  respectively,  which is
included in operating expenses.

An affiliate of the General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting to  approximately  $155,000 and
$136,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively,  which is
included in general and administrative expenses and investment property. For the
year ended  December 31, 2003 the first three  quarters  were based on estimated
amounts  and  in  the  fourth  quarter,   the   reimbursements   of  accountable
administrative  expenses were adjusted based on actual costs (see "Note C"). The
portion of these  reimbursements  included in investment  property for the years
ended  December  31, 2004 and 2003 are fees related to  construction  management
services  provided  by an  affiliate  of the  General  Partner of  approximately
$57,000 and $4,000,  respectively.  The construction management service fees are
calculated  based on a percentage  of current year  additions to the  investment
property.  Approximately  $57,000  of the  accountable  administrative  expenses
remain unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and are included in due to affiliates.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administration  management
services.  The General Partner earned approximately $9,000 and $4,000 during the
years  ended  December  31,  2004 and 2003,  respectively,  which is included in
general and administrative expenses.

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Partnership  received advances from
an  affiliate of the General  Partner of  approximately  $354,000.  Interest was
charged at the prime rate plus 2% (7.25% at December  31,  2004) and amounted to
approximately $3,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004,
the amount of outstanding loans and accrued interest was approximately  $357,000
and is  included  in due to  affiliate.  There  were no loans  from the  General
Partner or associated interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2003.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General
Partner.  During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership was
charged  by  AIMCO  and  its  affiliates   approximately  $24,000  and  $21,000,
respectively,  for  insurance  coverage and fees  associated  with policy claims
administration.

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 102,000 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 56.26% of the outstanding Units at
December  31,  2004.  A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire  additional  Units in exchange for cash or a combination
of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO,
either through private  purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 56.26% of the
outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its  affiliates  are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the  Partnership.  Although the General Partner
owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the General
Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a
result,  the  duties  of  the  General  Partner,  as  general  partner,  to  the
Partnership  and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of
the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Item 13.    Exhibits

            See attached Exhibit Index

Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The General Partner has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to
audit the financial  statements of the  Partnership for 2005. The aggregate fees
billed  for  services  rendered  by  Ernst & Young  LLP for  2004  and  2003 are
described below.

Audit Fees. Fees for audit services  totaled  approximately  $25,000 and $36,000
for 2004 and 2003,  respectively.  Fees for audit services also include fees for
the reviews of the Partnership's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB.

Tax Fees. Fees for tax services totaled approximately $6,000 and $7,000 for 2004
and 2003, respectively.

                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                          Stephen B. Waters
                                          Vice President


                                    Date: March 18, 2005


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following  persons on behalf of the  Registrant and
in the capacities on the date indicated.

/s/Harry G. Alcock            Director and Executive        Date: March 18, 2005
Harry G. Alcock               Vice President


/s/Martha L. Long             Director and Senior Vice      Date: March 18, 2005
Martha L. Long                President


/s/Stephen B. Waters          Vice President                Date: March 18, 2005
Stephen B. Waters


<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit Number    Description of Exhibit

      3.1         Certificate of Limited Partnership,  incorporated by reference
                  to the Registration  Statement of Registrant filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

      3.2         Agreement of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to
                  the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant  filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

      10.22       Multi-family  note between  Colony of  Springdale  Associates,
                  Ltd. and GMAC Commercial  Mortgage  Corporation  dated October
                  25, 1999.  (Incorporated  by reference to the Annual Report on
                  Form 10-K dated December 31, 1999.)

      31.1        Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      31.2        Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      32.1        Certification   Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
                  Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Martha L. Long, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Consolidated  Capital
      Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 18, 2005

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior Vice President of ConCap
                                    Equities, Inc., equivalent of the
                                    chief executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Consolidated  Capital
      Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 18, 2005

                                    /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Stephen B. Waters
                                    Vice President of ConCap
                                    Equities, Inc., equivalent of
                                    the chief financial officer of
                                    the Partnership


<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of  Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI (the "Partnership"), for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Martha  L.  Long,  as the  equivalent  of the  chief  executive  officer  of the
Partnership,  and Stephen B. Waters,  as the  equivalent of the chief  financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  March 18, 2005


                                           /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Name:  Stephen B. Waters
                                    Date:  March 18, 2005


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.