36482 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

spreadsheet models of the lamp types for greater 

detail on the estimates. 

7The October 2016 finding for rough service 

lamps was the result of a correction by NEMA to 

the data it initially submitted and relied upon by 

DOE for the April 7, 2016 notice. See, https://

www.regulations.gov/document?D=EERE-2013-BTSTD-0051-0075. 

the benchmark unit sales estimates and 

actual sales for each of the five lamp 

types in the following section and also 

makes the comparisons available in a 

spreadsheet online: https://

www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ 

appliance_standards/standards.aspx?

productid=16. 

IV. Comparison Results 

A. Rough Service Lamps 

On October 18, 2016, DOE published 

a notice announcing that the actual unit 

sales for rough service lamps were 219.7 

percent of the benchmark estimate for 

the 2015 calendar year. 81 FR 71794, 

71800.7 For the 2016 and 2017 calendar 

years, the exponential growth forecast 

projected the benchmark unit sales 

estimate for rough service lamps to be 

4,722,000 and 4,489,000 units 

respectively. The NEMA-provided 

shipment data reported shipments of 

9,674,000 units in 2016 and 5,860,000 

units in 2017. These findings are 204.9 

and 130.5 percent of the benchmark 

estimate. 

Since unit sales for rough service 

lamps exceeded 200 percent of the 

benchmark estimate in 2015, and DOE 

did not complete an energy 

conservation standards rulemaking for 

these lamps by the end of calendar year 

2016, the backstop requirement was 

triggered. DOE published a final rule on 

December 26, 2017, to adopt the 

statutory backstop requirements for 

rough service lamps which require that 

rough service lamps: (I) Have a shatterproof coating or equivalent technology 

that is compliant with NSF/ANSI 51 

and is designed to contain the glass if 

the glass envelope of the lamp is broken 

and to provide effective containment 

over the life of the lamp; (II) have a 

maximum 40-watt limitation; and (III) 

be sold at retail only in a package 

containing 1 lamp. (42 U.S.C. 

6295(l)(4)(D)(ii)) DOE will continue to 

collect and model data for rough service 

lamps for two years after the effective 

date of January 25, 2018, in accordance 

with 42 U.S.C. 6295(l)(4)(I)(ii). 

B. Vibration Service Lamps 

On April 7, 2016, DOE published a 

notice announcing that the actual unit 

sales for vibration service lamps were 

272.5 percent of the benchmark estimate 

for the 2015 calendar year. 81 FR 20261. 

For the 2016 and 2017 calendar years, 

the exponential growth forecast 

projected the benchmark unit sales 

estimate for vibration service lamps to 

be 2,467,000 and 2,345,000 units 

respectively. The NEMA-provided 

shipment data reported shipments of 

6,869,000 units in 2016 and 6,018,000 

units in 2017. These findings are 278.5 

and 256.6 percent of the benchmark 

estimate. 

Similar to rough service lamps, since 

unit sales for vibration service lamps 

exceeded 200 percent of the benchmark 

estimate in 2015, and DOE did not 

complete an energy conservation 

standards rulemaking for these lamps by 

the end of calendar year 2016, the 

backstop requirement was triggered. 

DOE published a final rule on December 

26, 2017 to adopt the statutory backstop 

requirements for vibration service lamps 

which require that vibration service 

lamps: (I) Have a maximum 40-watt 

limitation; and (II) be sold at retail only 

in a package containing 1 lamp. (42 

U.S.C. 6295(l)(4)(E)(ii)) DOE will 

continue to collect and model data for 

vibration service lamps for two years 

after the effective date of January 25, 

2018, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 

6295(l)(4)(I)(ii). 

C. Three-Way Incandescent Lamps 

For 3-way incandescent lamps, the 

exponential growth forecast projected 

the benchmark unit sales estimate for 

2016 to be 48,104,000 units and for 2017 

to be 47,610,000 units. The NEMAprovided shipment data reported 

shipments of 31,768,000 units in 2016 

and 28,468,000 units in 2017. As these 

findings are only 66 percent and 60 

percent of the benchmark estimate 

respectively, DOE will continue to track 

3-way incandescent lamp sales data and 

will not initiate an accelerated 

standards rulemaking for this lamp type 

at this time. 

D. 2,601–3,300 Lumen General Service 

Incandescent Lamps 

For 2,601–3,300 lumen general 

service incandescent lamps, the 

exponential growth forecast projected 

the benchmark unit sales estimate for 

2016 to be 34,241,000 units and for 2017 

to be 34,307,000 units. The NEMAprovided shipment data reported 

shipments of 3,679,000 units in 2016 

and 2,794,000 units in 2017. As these 

findings are 10.7 and 8.1 percent of the 

benchmark estimate respectively, DOE 

will continue to track 2,601–3,300 

lumen general service incandescent 

lamp sales data and will not impose 

statutory requirements for this lamp 

type at this time. 

E. Shatter-Resistant Lamps 

For shatter-resistant lamps, the 

exponential growth forecast projected 

the benchmark unit sales estimate for 

2016 to be 1,679,000 units and for 2017 

to be 1,684,000 units. The NEMAprovided shipment data reported 

shipments of 548,000 units in 2016 and 

474,000 units in 2017. As these findings 

are only 32.6 and 28.2 percent of the 

benchmark estimate respectively, DOE 

will continue to track shatter-resistant 

lamp sales data and will not initiate an 

accelerated standards rulemaking for 

this lamp type at this time. 

V. Conclusion 

This NODA compares the 2016 and 

2017 shipments against benchmark unit 

sales estimates for rough service lamps, 

vibration service lamps, 3-way 

incandescent lamps, 2,601–3,300 lumen 

general service incandescent lamps, and 

shatter-resistant lamps. For 3-way 

incandescent lamps, 2,601–3,300 lumen 

general service incandescent lamps, and 

shatter-resistant lamps, the 2016 and 

2017 sales are not greater than 200 

percent of the forecasted estimates. The 

2016 and 2017 unit sales for vibration 

service lamps are greater than 200 

percent of the benchmark unit sales 

estimate. The 2016 unit sales for rough 

service lamps are greater than 200 

percent of the benchmark unit sales 

estimate but the 2017 unit sales are 

below the benchmark unit sales 

estimate. DOE will continue to monitor 

these lamp types and will assess 2018 

unit sales next year. 

Signed in Washington, DC, on July 20, 

2018. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16097 Filed 7–27–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2016–9442; Airspace 

Docket No. 16–ASO–15] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Establishment of Class E 

Airspace; Crystal Springs, MS 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2018 / Proposed Rules 36483 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

establish Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

at Copiah County Airport, Crystal 

Springs, MS, to accommodate new area 

navigation (RNAV) global positioning 

system (GPS) standard instrument 

approach procedures serving the airport. 

Controlled airspace is necessary for the 

safety and management of instrument 

flight rules (IFR) operations at this 

airport. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 13, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule 

to: U. S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE, West Bldg. Ground Floor 

Rm. W12–140, Washington, DC 20590; 

telephone: 1–800–647–5527, or (202)- 

366–9826. You must identify the Docket 

No. FAA–2016–9442; Airspace Docket 

No. 16–ASO–15, at the beginning of 

your comments. You may also submit 

and review received comments through 

the internet at http://

www.regulations.gov. You may review 

the public docket containing the 

proposal, any comments received, and 

any final disposition in person in the 

Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except federal holidays. 

FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, and 

subsequent amendments can be viewed 

on line at http://www.faa.gov/air_

traffic/publications/. For further 

information, you can contact the 

Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is 

also available for inspection at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of FAA 

Order 7400.11B at NARA, call (202) 

741–6030, or go to https://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ 

ibr-locations.html. 

FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 1701 Columbia Ave., 

College Park, GA 30337; telephone (404) 

305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in title 

49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, 

Section 106 describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This proposed rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority, as it would 

establish Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

at Copiah County Airport, Crystal 

Springs, MS, to support standard 

instrument approach procedures for IFR 

operations at this airport. 

Comments Invited 

Interested persons are invited to 

comment on this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (Docket No. FAA– 

2016–9442 and Airspace Docket No. 16– 

ASO–15) and be submitted in triplicate 

to DOT Docket Operations (see 

‘‘ADDRESSES’’ section for the address 

and phone number.) You may also 

submit comments through the internet 

at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Persons wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2016–9442; Airspace 

Docket No. 16–ASO–15.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this document may be 

changed in light of the comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

comment closing date. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. All communications received on 

or before the specified closing date for 

comments will be considered before 

taking action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this notice may 

be changed in light of the comments 

received. A report summarizing each 

substantive public contact with FAA 

personnel concerned with this 

rulemaking will be filed in the docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s web page at http://

www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined between 

8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except federal holidays 

at the office of the Eastern Service 

Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 350, 1701 

Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 

30337. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents for Incorporation by 

Reference 

This document proposes to amend 

FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 3, 2017, and effective 

September 15, 2017. FAA Order 

7400.11B is publicly available as listed 

in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is considering an 

amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish 

Class E airspace extending upward from 

700 Feet above the surface within a 7- 

mile radius of Copiah County Airport, 

Crystal Springs, MS, providing the 

controlled airspace required to support 

the new RNAV (GPS) standard 

instrument approach procedures for IFR 

operations at the airport. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.11B, dated August 3, 2017, 

and effective September 15, 2017, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designation 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
36484 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

1 5 U.S.C. 552. 

2 17 CFR 145.9 (2017). Commission regulations 

referred to herein are found at 17 CFR chapter I, and 

can be accessed through the Commission’s website, 

www.cftc.gov. 

3See 78 FR 66621 (Nov. 6, 2013). 

4 7 U.S.C. 6s(l) (2012 & Supp. 2015). Like the 

Commission’s regulations, the CEA can be accessed 

through the Commission’s website. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a regulatory evaluation as 

the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal would be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.11B, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 3, 2017, and 

effective September 15, 2017, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward from 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth 

* * * * * 

ASO MS E5 Crystal Springs, MS [New] 

Copiah County Airport, MS 

(Lat. 31°54′09′′ N, long. 90°22′00′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius 

of Copiah County Airport. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 19, 

2018. 

Ryan W. Almasy, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16134 Filed 7–27–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Part 23 

RIN 3038–AE78 

Segregation of Assets Held as 

Collateral in Uncleared Swap 

Transactions 

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or 

‘‘CFTC’’) is proposing to amend selected 

provisions of its regulations in order to 

simplify certain requirements for swap 

dealers (‘‘SDs’’) and major swap 

participants (‘‘MSPs’’) concerning 

notification of counterparties of their 

right to segregate initial margin for 

uncleared swaps, and to modify 

requirements for the handling of 

segregated initial margin (the 

‘‘Proposal’’). 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 28, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by RIN 3038–AE78, by any of 

the following methods: 

• CFTC Comments Portal: https://

comments.cftc.gov. Select the ‘‘Submit 

Comments’’ link for this rulemaking and 

follow the instructions on the Public 

Comment Form. 

• Mail: Send to Christopher 

Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the 

Commission, Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission, Three Lafayette 

Centre, 1155 21st Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20581. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Follow the 

same instructions as for Mail, above. 

Please submit your comments using 

only one of these methods. To avoid 

possible delays with mail or in-person 

deliveries, submissions through the 

CFTC Comments Portal are encouraged. 

All comments must be submitted in 

English, or if not, accompanied by an 

English translation. Comments will be 

posted as received to https://

comments.cftc.gov. You should submit 

only information that you wish to make 

available publicly. If you wish the 

Commission to consider information 

that you believe is exempt from 

disclosure under the Freedom of 

Information Act (‘‘FOIA’’),1 a petition 

for confidential treatment of the exempt 

information may be submitted according 

to the procedures set forth in § 145.9 of 

the Commission’s regulations.2

The Commission reserves the right, 

but shall have no obligation, to review, 

pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or 

remove any or all of your submission 

from https://comments.cftc.gov that it 

may deem to be inappropriate for 

publication, such as obscene language. 

All submissions that have been redacted 

or removed that contain comments on 

the merits of the rulemaking will be 

retained in the public comment file and 

will be considered as required under the 

Administrative Procedure Act and other 

applicable laws, and may be accessible 

under the FOIA. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew Kulkin, Director, (202) 418– 

5213, mkulkin@cftc.gov; Erik Remmler, 

Deputy Director, (202) 418–7630, 

eremmler@cftc.gov; or Christopher 

Cummings, Special Counsel, (202) 418– 

5445, ccummings@cftc.gov, Division of 

Swap Dealer and Intermediary 

Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission, 1155 21st Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20581. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction 

A. Existing Requirements 

Subpart L of the Commission’s 

regulations (‘‘Segregation of Assets Held 

as Collateral in Uncleared Swap 

Transactions’’ consisting of Regulations 

23.700 through 23.704) was published 

in the Federal Register on November 6, 

2013 and became effective January 6, 

2014.3 Subpart L implements the 

requirements for segregation of initial 

margin for uncleared swap transactions 

set forth in section 4s(l) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’ or the 

‘‘Act’’).4

CEA section 4s(l) addresses 

segregation of initial margin held as 

collateral in certain uncleared swap 

transactions. The section applies only to 

swaps between a counterparty and an 

SD or MSP that are not submitted for 

clearing to a derivatives clearing 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS