35494 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2018 / Notices 

3. Commenters stated that HUD 

should try to streamline its over-income 

policies across multiple HUD programs. 

HUD Response: HUD appreciates the 

suggestion. However, this comment is 

outside of the scope of this notice. In 

many cases, over-income policies vary 

by program due to program design and 

funding structures, so HUD is limited in 

its ability to align such requirements. 

III. Implementation 

Through this notice, HUD is 

announcing that as of the date this 

notice is effective, HUD will be 

following the provisions of section 

16(a)(5) of the 1937 Act, as added by 

section 103 of HOTMA, using the 

method of determining the over-income 

limit as described in the November 29, 

2016, notice. PHAs must update their 

Admissions and Continued Occupancy 

Policies (ACOP) to implement these 

changes. Such policies must include the 

imposition of an over-income limit in 

the program, all instances of when the 

two-year timeframe begins, and 

notification requirements. If the 

implementation of this provision 

requires a significant amendment to a 

PHA’s annual plan, a PHA should 

immediately take steps to complete the 

significant amendment process in order 

to effectuate the policy change. PHAs 

must complete all relevant policy and 

PHA plan changes no later than 6 

months after the effective date of this 

notice. 

Once a PHA has completed updates to 

its ACOP and, if necessary, its PHA 

plan, when the PHA becomes aware, 

through an annual reexamination or an 

interim reexamination for an increase in 

income, that a family’s income exceeds 

the applicable income limit, the PHA 

must, per section 16(a)(5) of the 1937 

Act, document that the family exceeds 

the threshold to compare with the 

family’s income a year later. 

If, one year after the initial 

determination by the PHA that a 

family’s income exceeds the overincome limit, the family’s income 

continues to exceed the over-income 

limit, the PHA must, as required by 

section 16(a)(5) of the 1937 Act, provide 

written notification to the family that 

their income has exceeded the overincome limit for one year, and that if the 

family’s income continues to exceed the 

over-income limit for the next 12 

consecutive months, the family will be 

subject to either a higher rent or 

termination based on the PHA’s 

policies. If, however, a PHA discovers 

through an annual or interim 

reexamination that a previously overincome family has income that is now 

below the over-income limit, the family 

is no longer subject to these provisions. 

The family is entitled to a new 2-year 

grace period if the family’s income once 

again exceeds the over-income limit. 

HUD will provide additional 

information on where to locate 

applicable income limits, guidelines for 

PHAs to set alternative rents for overincome families, and any other guidance 

regarding this provision in a 

forthcoming notice. 

IV. Environmental Impact Certification 

This notice involves statutorily 

required income limits and exclusions 

with regard to eligibility for or 

calculation of HUD housing assistance 

or rental assistance which does not 

constitute a development decision 

affecting the physical condition of 

specific project areas or building sites. 

Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6), 

this notice is categorically excluded 

from environmental review under the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321). 

Dated: July 9, 2018. 

Danielle Bastarache, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and 

Indian Housing. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15941 Filed 7–25–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled Certain Lithography Machines 

and Systems and Components Thereof 

(II), DN 3329; the Commission is 

soliciting comments on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or complainant’s filing pursuant to the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The 

public version of the complaint can be 

accessed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, 

and will be available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server at United 

States International Trade Commission 

(USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov . The 

public record for this investigation may 

be viewed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure filed on behalf of Carl 

Ziess SMT GmBH on July 20, 2018. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1337) in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain lithography 

machines and systems and components 

thereof (II). The complaint names as 

respondents: Nikon Corporation of 

Japan; Nikon Research Corporation of 

America of Belmont, CA; and Nikon 

Precision Inc. of Belmont, CA. The 

complainant requests that the 

Commission issue a limited exclusion 

order, cease and desist orders and 

impose a bond upon respondents’ 

alleged infringing articles during the 60- 

day Presidential review period pursuant 

to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). 

Proposed respondents, other 

interested parties, and members of the 

public are invited to file comments, not 

to exceed five (5) pages in length, 

inclusive of attachments, on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should 

address whether issuance of the relief 

specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2018 / Notices 35495 

1Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: 

https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_

filing_procedures.pdf. 

2All contract personnel will sign appropriate 

nondisclosure agreements. 

3Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the requested 

remedial orders would impact United 

States consumers. 

Written submissions on the public 

interest must be filed no later than by 

close of business, eight calendar days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. There 

will be further opportunities for 

comment on the public interest after the 

issuance of any final initial 

determination in this investigation. Any 

written submissions on other issues 

should be filed no later than by close of 

business nine calendar days after the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. Complainant may file 

a reply to any written submission no 

later than the date on which 

complainant’s reply would be due 

under § 210.8(c)(2) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.8(c)(2)). 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to § 210.4(f) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). 

Submissions should refer to the docket 

number (Docket No. 3329) in a 

prominent place on the cover page and/ 

or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic 

Filing Procedures 1). Persons with 

questions regarding filing should 

contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All such requests 

should be directed to the Secretary to 

the Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this Investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel,2 solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and on EDIS.3

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of §§ 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: July 20, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15960 Filed 7–25–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1106] 

Certain Toner Cartridges and 

Components Thereof; Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Amending the 

Complainant and Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 18) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

amending the complaint and notice of 

investigation in the above-captioned 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on March 29, 2018, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of Canon 

U.S.A. Inc. of Melville, New York and 

Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, 

Virginia. 83 FR 13516–17. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 9,746,826 (‘‘the ’826 

patent’’); 9,836,021 (‘‘the ’021 patent’’); 

9,841,727 (‘‘the ’727 patent’’); 9,841,728 

(‘‘the ’728 patent’’); 9,841,729 (‘‘the ’729 

patent’’); 9,857,764 (‘‘the ’764 patent’’); 

9,857,765 (‘‘the ’765 patent’’); 9,869,960 

(‘‘the ’960 patent’’); and 9,874,846. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named numerous respondents including 

Aster Graphics Co., Ltd. (‘‘Aster 

Graphics’’) of Guangdong, China; Do It 

Wiser LLC d/b/a Image Toner (‘‘Image 

Toner’’) of Alpharetta, Georgia; Global 

Cartridges of Burlingame, California; 

GPC Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a GPC Image 

(‘‘GPC Image’’) of Kowloon, Hong Kong; 

and The Supplies Guys, LLC of 

Lancaster, Pennsylvania. The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations is also a 

party to the investigation. 

On June 13, 2018, complainants filed 

an unopposed amended motion to 

amend the complaint and notice of 

investigation (‘‘NOI’’) to do the 

following: (1) Change the name of 

respondent The Supplies Guys, LLC to 

The Supplies Guys, Inc.; (2) correct the 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES