alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**
          I, Dr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and Chief Executive Officer, certifythat:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProfessionalVeterinary Products, Ltd.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registration, and we have:
     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;
     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;and
     (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: December 15, 2004.
/s/ Dr. Lionel L. ReillyDr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and Chief
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1288 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1288

  To amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2013

 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Coburn, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY ACCOUNTABILITY.

    (a) Sanctions Under Rule 11.--Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``may'' and inserting 
        ``shall'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Rule 5'' and all that 
        follows through ``motion.'' and inserting ``rule 5.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ``situated'' and all that 
        follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting 
        ``situated, and to compensate the parties that were injured by 
        such conduct. Subject to the limitations in paragraph (5), the 
        sanction shall consist of an order to pay to the party or 
        parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred as a 
        direct result of the violation, including reasonable attorneys' 
        fees and costs. The court may also impose additional 
        appropriate sanctions, such as striking the pleadings, 
        dismissing the suit, or other directives of a nonmonetary 
        nature, or, if warranted for effective deterrence, an order 
        directing payment of a penalty into the court''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act or an amendment made 
by this Act shall be construed to bar or impede the assertion or 
development of new claims, defenses, or remedies under Federal, State, 
or local laws, including civil rights laws, or under the Constitution 
of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### Thomas I. MILLS v. STATE of Florida.

No. 38612.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
| ) /STt-206.)

Note A.—The Census Year begins June 1, 1879, and ends May 31, 1880.

Page No. 7Z Page Nv.

Note B.—All persons will be included in the Enumeration who were living on the ist day of June, 1880. No others will. Children BORN SINCE

Supervisor's Dist. No. 4 | June 1, 1880, will be OMITTED. Members of Famiiies who have DIED SINCE June 1, 1880, will be INCLUDED. Superv

‘| Note C.—Questions Nos. 13, 14, 22 and 23 are not to be asked in respect to persons under 10 years of age.

Enumeration Dist. No. Y2 : Enumeratic |

SCHEDULE |.—Inhabitants in bo-.Ly ahr Lv kf, . in the County of . eee _.., State of 70 220 fern, SCHED!
enumerated by me on the 7* 7 j/ (\avot June, 1880.

ni merdator, +

Nativity

|

Is the person fon the 2 .
day of the Enuntera- = ~ Place of Birth of this person, Place of Birth of the hue 1
tor’s visit] sick or | 2. = naming State or Territory Fatiten of this per- Mons
temporarily disabled, = 2 of United States, or the son, uamiig the
seas te be unable to | 3 = Country, if of foreign birth State or Territory
attend te ordinary = = of United States, or rl
lhusiness or duties? — = the Country, if of thie ¢

If so, what is the sick- . = = | foreign birth forety
ness or disability?

tien,

Relationship of each
person te the head -
of this family— ®
whether wife, son, -s
daughter, servant,
bourder, or other.

Jnne 1, 1880, Tf under

visit
scetions, thus: yy.

The Name of each Person whose place of
abode, on Ist day of Jnue, TSS), was
in this family.

year, give the month.

Profession, Occupation or Trade of
each person, male or female.

haus

Nomber of mouths this person has been unemployed

‘olor--White, Wa Mack, fy Mulatto, Mu.; Chinese, 0;
during the Census year,

Iudiau '.
larried during Census year,

Families numbered in order ot
Awe at last birthday prior to
year, give months in fr

Name of Street.

Name of Street,

- 25 5

(epaegvettt LL At77L0
Za 4 Ss 7 / ) 9
Atif 20%

£) ?

a Sex—Male My Female, F

1 if born within the Ce

re ‘

—— “Qefrar< 22 F 3
_Lartier oo fs fs
Cc atin, BDfa/3
Pratl PAM

We Mat hoot pene 7, 2
rover

ae:

 *
FZ

Mtn £0.74 3.2 va =
Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
available records like the one shown here.

-

Note D.—In making eutriex in columns 9, 10, 11, 12, 16 to 23, an affirmative mark only will be ased—thus es except in the case of divorced persons, column 11, when the letter ‘‘ D” is to be used.
Note E.—Quvestion No. 12 will only be asked in cases where an alirmative auswer has been given either to question 10 or to question 11.

Nove F.—Question No. 14 will only be asked in cases when a gainful occupation has been reported in column 13. Vv)

Note G.—In column 7 an abbreviation in the name of the month may be used, as Jan., Apr., Dec. iy 1
Exhibit 10.6.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to Distribution Agreement, made as of
this 2nd day of October, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), is by and between Fresenius Medical Care Holdings,
Inc. (“Fresenius”) and Humacyte, Inc. (“Humacyte”) (collectively, the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS, the Parties are parties to that Distribution
Agreement dated June 25, 2018 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Agreement pursuant
to the terms and conditions described herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
contained herein, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


 


		1.	Section 2.2.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following as of the Effective Date:



 


“2.2.1 Composition.
Each Party will appoint [***] to the JSC, with each representative [***]. As of the Effective Date, as defined
in the First Amendment to Distribution Agreement, such representatives are as follows:


 


	
        Humacyte Appointees:

        [***]
	
        Fresenius Appointees:

        [***]



 


The Humacyte [***]. The JSC may change its
size from time to time by consent of the Parties, provided that the JSC will consist at all times of an equal number of representatives
of each Party. [***] The JSC may invite non-members to participate in the discussions and meetings of the JSC, but such
participants will have no voting authority at the JSC and must be bound under written obligations of confidentiality no less protective
of the Parties’ Confidential Information than those set forth in this Agreement. The JSC will be co-chaired, with one (1)
chairperson designated by each Party, whose responsibilities will include conducting meetings, including, when feasible, ensuring
that objectives for each meeting are set and achieved. Responsibility for running each meeting of the JSC will alternate between
the chairpersons from meeting-to-meeting, with Fresenius’ chairperson running the first meeting. The chairperson for a particular
meeting will prepare and circulate agendas in advance thereof and will ensure the preparation and approval of minutes for such
meeting. The chairpersons have no additional powers or rights beyond those held by the other JSC representatives.”


 


		2.	Except as otherwise amended by the terms herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
and are hereby affirmed and ratified.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this First
Amendment to Distribution Agreement on the dates shown below.


 






     


     


    

 


	FRESENIUS:	 	HUMACYTE:
	 	 	 
	Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.	 	Humacyte, Inc.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ William Valle	 	By:	/s/ Jeffrey Lawson 
	Name:	William Valle	 	Name:	Jeffrey Lawson
	Its:	President	 	Its:	CEO
	 	 	 	 	 
	Date: 	10/7/19	 	Date:	October 2, 2019
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1499 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

278 Main Street in Chadron, Nebraska, as the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek 

Memorial Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. JOHANNS (for himself and Mrs. FISCHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 278 Main Street in Chadron, Nebraska, as 

the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT CORY MRACEK MEMORIAL POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 278 Main Street in Chadron, Ne7 braska, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

8 Cory Mracek Memorial Post Office’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1499 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Cory Mracek 

5 Memorial Post Office’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
° Oe
Sege 24, be i he

| .
| ‘A.cThe Census'Yede begins Sunes, io
Page No. Note Ball périone will be inliaded n fhe et citdren 7
sepmals Qt Nas ‘ene 0 OMITTED IED SNE tne, wf teinctuoED, |e gg |=
ry Note C~Questions Nos. r |

cnn
SCHEDULE L—Tahabitanis in 2OQCNrtede 3

enumerated by me on the

4 28a area ot ane in rapt operon nano yor eres | i
an ip of LedZvod oe |
-sin the County of A2édiava.:.., State ot ALK ca, |

18% day of Tame, 1880, ao

Ben. De

in
Lt

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www .archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

Tf

UNS SHS SDS:

es RN

pw es

i
bss!
#### Larry McCORMICK, Appellant, v. HARDRIVES COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-1046.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Neis R. Pearson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Centenary International Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of
                the
                Company.






/s/
      Carlos Fabian De Sousa


Carlos
      Fabian De Sousa


Chief
      Executive Officer


March
      25,
      2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated
      by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
      or
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
      the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
      Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Irene SYM, Petitioner, v. ACCELERATED LEARNING SCHOOLS OF FLORIDA et al., Respondents.

No. 43759.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 25, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Place of Birth, » dumb, blind, in-
Naming the State, Territory, sane, idiotic,
E .: pauper, or con-

i

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

="
So
—
So

pond
—
pt
rn"

7 :
Go

bo
7 8)

_
ad .
—_
b>

_
is)

RI LEILA
~ %

—
oS

—_
or ‘

—_ Ll
or co

—_
o>
—_
co

_
bon f
—_
~y

"
,
ue
7 .
-
a2
: >
’
7

Cope POL bet Pek eb ee Oe be tr
pope ER Nbc ke RE Be be oe eo OS

fmt
oo

pun
©
—"
Ls a) °

bo
—
bo
oO

bo
—_—
bt}
pd

A)
ts
bo
b9

bo
=)

fill
;

fink
ae
pt
ou
Bae
ie
mee
ts
evs
we
71
me
eal
an
ear.
ba
abit
ae

so wo ww
> Oo

bo
~Y

\
.

\

g .
, . | Q
Y v —_ .

&

§
s
\
v)

ji
= $ $
3

}

'

}

'

|

Pegs =
~s si J
s »4
_>.
P ~~

Oo
bo) i aaa
oo
b&S

eo
'
aw
oo

-

7 xX | :
SE SRR BWIN PRS REARS RAPER R SRE Db oR
SSE PPR ESAS RIS SHS SAAR RR So ABUSE hoffe

: :
4 m .
s
‘
:

NS!
a

oe!

Va
IS’.

6—4
#### ROBERT A. SULLIVAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. WILTON MANORS NATIONAL BANK et al., Appellees.

No. 73-155.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1974.

*562Vincent Meade, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

J. Patrick Dyal of Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Wilton Manors Nat. Bank.

POULTON, TIMOTHY P., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary final judgment in favor of the bank. The bank had been sued by appellant upon the theory that the bank had allowed a collection of a check payable to the appellant upon a forged endorsement. Based upon Florida Statute 673.3^-19(3) F.S.A. and the ruling in Messeroff v. Kantor, Fla.App.1972, 261 So.2d 553, the trial court entered its judgment.

 As we read that statute, it acts to eliminate liability when it might otherwise exist. Hence, it was necessary upon motion for summary judgment for the bank to file appropriate proofs that it had (in the language of the statute) “ . . . in good faith and in accordance with the reasonable commercial standards applicable to the business of such representative dealt with an instrument or its proceeds on behalf of one who was not the true owner. . ” The affidavit of the bank’s employee that it paid the forged check “in the usual course of business” was in our view insufficient.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GIGA INFORMATION GROUP, INC. FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        7,024          1,692
<SECURITIES>                                  1,804              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                13,810         13,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                    382            415
<INVENTORY>                                       0              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             30,269         26,975
<PP&E>                                        8,567         11,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                2,943          5,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               36,337         34,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        40,178         44,361
<BONDS>                                           0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0              0
<PREFERRED>                                       0              0
<COMMON>                                         10             10
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3,851)       (10,614)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 36,337         34,152
<SALES>                                      37,292         51,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             37,292         51,986
<CGS>                                        19,858         23,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                51,416         59,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                480            272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (509)          (281)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (14,095)        (7,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     62            (25)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (14,157)        (7,255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0              0
<CHANGES>                                         0              0
<NET-INCOME>                                (14,157)        (7,255)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.42)         (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (1.42)         (0.71)


</TABLE>
#### Walter John SMITH, Appellant, v. John Henry EARWOOD and Rose Wingler Earwood, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-41.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 17, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Parker Lee McDonald, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I,  Thomas W.  Martin,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp., the General
Partner of the Registrant in connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ICON Cash
Flow Partners L.P. Seven (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the  "Quarterly  Report")  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


Dated:   November 13, 2006

/s/ Thomas W. Martin
----------------------------------
Thomas W. Martin
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
ICON Capital Corp.
General Partner of ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER BRAND, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D23-1318 September 1, 2023 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Gregory G. Groger, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### John Paul HERB v. CRIMINAL COURT OF RECORD, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, Florida.

No. 36573.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Mandamus denied without opinion.