alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SOUTHERN STATES MASONRY CO., INC. v. MISSION INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 61416.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Southern States Masonry Co., Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 353 So.2d 307.

Denied.

DIXON, CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant this writ.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 36589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16185]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of Intent To Terminate 
Receiverships

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (``FDIC'' or ``Receiver''), as Receiver for the 
institutions listed below, intends to terminate its receivership for 
said institutions.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Date of
             Fund                  Receivership name               City                State         receiver
                                                                                                    appointment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4637.........................  First National Bank of    Keystone...............  WV                    9/1/1999
                                Keystone.
10446........................  Security Exchange Bank..  Marietta...............  GA                   6/15/2012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The liquidation of the assets for each receivership has been 
completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance 
with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to 
proven creditors. Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined 
that the continued existence of the receiverships will serve no useful 
purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receiverships shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of any of the receiverships, such comment must be made in 
writing, identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and 
be sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201. No comments concerning the termination 
of the above-mentioned receiverships will be considered which are not 
sent within this time frame.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on July 25, 2018.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16185 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 145 (Friday, July 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-8512-000]


Miller, Paul J.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on July 18, 2018, Paul J. Miller, submitted for 
filing an, application for authority to hold interlocking positions, 
pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825d(b) 
and section 45.8 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR part 45.8 (2018).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
``eSubscription'' link on the website that enables subscribers to 
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed 
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#682e2d3a2b27060401060d3b1d1818071a1c280e0d1a0b460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bafcffe8f9f5d4d6d3d4dfe9cfcacad5c8cefadcdfc8d994ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 8, 2018.

    Dated: July 19, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-16086 Filed 7-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.37


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment (this
“Amendment”) dated as of the 12th day of February, 2021 amends the Employment Agreement, dated July
31, 2018 (the “Agreement”), by and between Adial Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and
William B. Stilley, III (“Executive”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.  


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth below.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
for the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1. Term of Employment.
Section 1.16 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“1.16. “Term
of Employment” means the period commencing on the date hereof and ending on March 31, 2026.”


 


2. Annual Bonus.
The first sentence of Section 3.2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“During the Term of Employment,
the Executive shall be eligible to earn an annual performance bonus based on the achievement of the performance goals established
by the Board or a committee thereof in its sole discretion, with an annual target bonus opportunity of forty percent (40%) of the
Base Salary and the potential to earn a higher bonus for above target performance, with the amount of any such bonus to be determined
in the sole discretion of the Board or a committee thereof, in any case, excluding the Executive (the “Annual Bonus”).”


 


3. No Other Amendments;
Confirmation. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Agreement, as amended by this
Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter thereof.


 


4. Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but both of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


5. Choice of
Law. This Amendment shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware without
regard to its conflict of laws principles.


 


[Signature page follows]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.


 


	 	Company:
	 	 	 
	 	ADIAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Joseph
    Truluck
	 	Name: 	Joseph Truluck
	 	Title:	 Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	Executive:  
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ William B. Stilley, III
	 	WILLIAM B. STILLEY, III
Exhibit 21.  Subsidiaries of the Registrant

     Interchange Bank (formerly known as Interchange State Bank), and Clover
Leaf Mortgage Company, Inc., both of which are incorporated in New Jersey, are
wholly owned direct subsidiaries of the Registrant.

     Clover Leaf Investment Corporation, Clover Leaf Insurance Agency Inc.(d/b/a
Interchange Insurance Agency) and Interchange Capital Company, L.L.C. are
incorporated in New Jersey and are wholly owned direct subsidiaries of
Interchange Bank. Clover Leaf Management Realty Corporation, which is also
incorporated in New Jersey, is 99% owned by Interchange Bank.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Date:  July 14, 2006                    /s/ Larry F Vance
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Larry F Vance
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
#### Veitch W. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION and Harold T. Mooney, Respondents.

No. 72-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 13, 1972.

*252Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward and Allan M. Glaser, Miami Beach, for petitioner.

Frank A. Wilkinson and John Huskins, Winter Park, for respondents.

Before CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Florida Real Estate Commission suspending the registration of petitioner as a real estate broker for a period of six months. The commission’s order of suspension was based on its finding that petitioner was guilty of fraud, concealment, dishonest dealings and breach of trust in failing to submit an offer to his principal prior to his purchases of the property in question for his own account, in violation of § 475.25(1) (a) Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

The determinative point before us is whether the final order of the commission is supported by competent substantial evidence. Upon careful consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we have concluded that the order of suspension was not supported by competent substantial evidence and was contrary to the manifest preponderance of the evidence. Therefore, certiorari is granted and the final order of the Florida Real Estate Commission under review is quashed.
#### MARKS v. NOVAK.

No. 36560.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 199 So.2d 319.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated March 25, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 513 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-251369) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Denis Gallant, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,

not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant

and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known

to us by others within those entities, particularly during the

period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about

the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of

the end of the period covered by this report based on such

evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the

registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design

or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Denis Gallant

------------------------------

Denis Gallant

Chief Financial Officer



November 17, 2005
Exhibit 31.2

Section 302 Certification

I, Sean M. McCarthy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Diedrich Coffee, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 21, 2008 |  | /s/ Sean M. McCarthy   
|                      |  | Sean M. McCarthy       
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                 PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the restatement of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
 of VPGI Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
 "Report"), I, Patrick A. Custer, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
 Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S1350,
 as adopted pursuant to S906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
 the best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


 October 13, 2004

                               /s/  PATRICK A. CUSTER
                                    -----------------
                                    Patrick A. Custer
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Principal Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 7, 2017 

# Order

Clerk July 7, 2017

154374 (150)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 154374

v COA: 325856

Berrien CC: 2014

- 001528

- FH

EDWARD PINKNEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of the American Civil Liberties Union of

Michigan for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief

submitted o n June 30, 2017, is accepted for filing.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Ex parte William Antonio Alarcon Arriola

No. 06-23-00203-CR

Appeal from the County Court of Maverick

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 32532). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

van Cleef, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice 

Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, William Antonio Alarcon Arriola, has adequately indicated 

his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 30, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Julius P. BROXSON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. S-273.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 1973.

Julius P. Broxson, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shcvin, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Julius P. Broxson, in seeking a writ of habeas corpus alleges that in the year 1957 he was convicted, by jury verdict, in the Circuit Court of Santa Rosa County, Florida, of the crime of robbery, and sentenced to a period of twenty years. Petitioner further alleges that he was rep*479resented by private counsel; and that after his conviction, following counsel’s advice, he informed the court of his desire to appeal and his inability to raise funds to prosecute same. This court’s records reflect that on March 28, 1967, a judgment of affirmance was entered pursuant to petitioner’s collateral attack on the foregoing judgment of conviction (197 So.2d 61).

In Remp v. State, 248 So.2d 677 (1 Fla.App.1970), this court in considering a similar factual situation held the doctrine of laches applicable which precluded the right of petitioner to a belated appeal.

Upon the authority of Remp v. State, supra, we decline to issue the rule nisi and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby denied.

SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Professional
Veterinary Products, Ltd. Form 10-Q (the Report) for the quarter ended
October 31, 2004, each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. and will be retained by
Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. and furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request. Date: December 15, 2004. /s/ Dr. Lionel L. Reilly Dr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and Chief Executive Officer
 /s/ Neal B. Soderquist Neal B. Soderquist, Chief Financial Officer
#### BYRONS DEPARTMENT STORE, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Shirley R. WILLIAMS et al., Appellees.

No. 72-526.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 27, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.