alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of International Wire Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Dated: August 14, 2006
    
    /s/ GLENN J. HOLLERName: Glenn J. HollerTitle: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EUGENE HWANG

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1295

[ January 2, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Usan

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12

- 2440CF10A

.

Mark H. Klein of MHK Legal, PLLC, Coral Springs, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Stev en Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, G ERBER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

             MULTIMEDIA CONCEPTS INTERNATIONAL, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial  statements for the three months ended December 31, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<CAPTION>

<S>                           <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Sep-30-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                  Oct-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1996 
<CASH>                          1,115,724
<SECURITIES>                    0 
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     30,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,609,929
<PP&E>                          29,361
<DEPRECIATION>                  12,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,588,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           304,720
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        3,005
<OTHER-SE>                      7,280,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    7,588,368
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               183,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (171,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (171,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0 
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (171,026)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (.06)
        

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
261 La. 820

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Huey P. GAUTHIER.

No. 52427.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 1972.

In re: The State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Granted. (See order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable John S. Covington, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of October, 1972, the record in dupli*229cate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A. M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birner Dental Management
Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to his knowledge:


1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

                                   Date:    November 14, 2005


                                     By:    ___________________________________
                                   Name:    Frederic W.J. Birner
                                  Title:    Chief Executive Officer


                                     By:    ___________________________________
                                   Name:    Dennis N. Genty
                                  Title:    Chief Financial Officer
259 La. 904

#### LOUISIANA STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION et al. v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al.

No. 51791.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1971.

In re: Louis M. Sowers, Dir. of the Dept. of Corrections, and the Louisiana Department of Corrections applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 251 So.2d 524.

Writ refused. The result is correct.
#### William Dale, Respondent, *vs.*Frank Copple, *et al.,*Appellants.

1. *Practice, civil*— Appeal—Final *judgment.*— Where, oil appeal to the Supreme Court the record shows a verdict for plaintiff, and that the Court “ordered judgment entered accordingly,” but no entry of the judgment appears in the record, the appeal will be dismissed.

*Appeal from Livingston Circuit Court.*

*Broadus Of Pollard,*for Appellants.

*John E.*Wait, for Eespondent.

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action of trespass for cutting down the timber of plaintiff', William Dale; brought by him against the road overseer, William H. Anderson, and a number of other defendants. The record shows that a verdict was returned *322for the plaintiff, in the usual form, and then this language is used: “ Whereupon, the court ordered judgment to be en-

tered accordingly.” But no judgment is actually entered, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.

Judges Adams and Tories concur; Judges Wagner and Napton absent.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form  S-3  (No.  333-22165)  and the  Registration  Statement  on Form  S-8 (No.
333-31211) of Sandata,  Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated July 24, 1998,
which  appears  on page F-2 of this  annual  report on Form  10-KSB for the year
ended May 31, 1998.




Marcum & Kliegman LLP






Woodbury, New York
August 27, 1998
#### Doris Gantz et al., Appellants, v Richard Brown, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[655 NYS2d 985]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated February 22, 1996, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant Richard Brown as against the weight of the credible evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The jury’s determination that the defendant Richard Brown was not negligent in causing the automobile accident was supported by a " ' " 'fair interpretation of the evidence’ ” ’ ” *(see, Lolik v Big V Supermarket,*86 NY2d 744; *Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129, 134). Although one may be found negligent for failing to observe an approaching vehicle which is in plain sight, Brown claimed that he did not see the plaintiffs’ car until the time of impact because foliage was obstructing his view and the plaintiffs’ car darted out in front of him.(see, *Weigand v United Traction Co.,*221 NY 39; *Tannenbaum v Mandell,*51 AD2d 593). Accordingly, the trial court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict. Rosenblatt, J. P., Thompson, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before KING , M C CONNELL , and GERRITY , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Martin R. VILLARREAL Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ),

U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 201 900025
Decided: 11 December 2019

. Appeal from the United S tates Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

. Military Judge : Major Keaton H. Harrell , U.S. Marine Corps . Sentence adjudged 15 November 2018 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina , consisting of a military judge si tting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for ten months , and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander W. Scott Stoebner , JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

________________________ _ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________United States v. Villarreal , NMCCA No. 201 900025

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of First Investors Financial Services, Inc., (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, TommyA. Moore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)                      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Act of 1934; and

(2)                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:Dec 13, 2006
|        | By:                     | /s/ Tommy A. Moore, Jr. |   |
|--------|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Tommy A. Moore, Jr.     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**NEITHER THIS WARRANT NOR ANY OF THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE HEREOF HAVE BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "ACT"), OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAW.  THE WARRANTS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE HEREOF MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED, SOLD, ASSIGNED, EXCHANGED, MORTGAGED, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF OR ENCUMBERED WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF, AND ARE OTHERWISE RESTRICTED BY THE PROVISIONS OF, THE ACT, THE RULES AND REGULATIONS THEREUNDER AND THIS WARRANT.**

Warrant No. 2

**WARRANT**

**TO PURCHASE 1,875,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK**

**(SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT)**

**OF**

**SKYTERRA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.**

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P., or its registered assigns, is entitled, at any time prior to the Expiration Date (such term, and certain other capitalized terms used herein being hereinafter defined), to purchase from SKYTERRA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), 1,875,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company, (subject to adjustment as provided herein), at a purchase price of $.01 per share (the initial "Exercise Price", subject to adjustment as provided herein).

| **1.** | **DEFINITIONS** |
|--------|-----------------|

As used in this Warrant, the following terms have the respective meanings set forth below:

"Affiliate" of any Person means any other Person which directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with such Person.  The term "control" (including the terms "controlled by" and "under common control with") as used with respect to any Person means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.

"April Warrants" shall mean warrants to be issued by the Company to Harbinger on April 1, 2009 (or such other time that the Company and Harbinger may agree) to purchase an aggregate of 21,250,000 shares of Common Stock, and all warrants issued upon transfer, division, or combination of, or in substitution of such warrants.

 

 

 

----
259 La. 896

#### Alfha HARRELL v. DELTA DRILLING COMPANY and the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York.

No. 51733.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1971.

In re: Delta Drilling Company and The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 251 So.2d 97.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error in the judgment complained of.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                                                State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation
------------------                                                --------------------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>
Material Sciences Corporation, Engineered Materials and Solutions
  Group, Inc. (formerly known as MSC Pre Finish Metals Inc.)      Illinois

Material Sciences Corporation, Electronic Materials and Devices
  Group, Inc.                                                     Delaware

MSC Pre Finish Metals (EGV) Inc.                                  Delaware

MSC Pre Finish Metals (MV) Inc.                                   Delaware

MSC Pre Finish Metals (MT) Inc.                                   Delaware

MSC Walbridge Coatings Inc.                                       Delaware

MSC San Diego Holding Company Inc. (formerly known as MSC
  Specialty Films, Inc.)                                          California

MSC Laminates and Composites Inc.                                 Delaware

MSC Laminates and Composites (EGV) Inc.                           Delaware

Material Sciences Foreign Sales Corporation                       U. S. Virgin Islands

MSC Richmond Holding Company Inc. (formerly known as MSC
  Pinole Point Steel Inc.)                                        Delaware

MSC Pre Finish Metals (PP) Inc.                                   Delaware

MSC/GAC Laminates and Composites Holding GmbH                     Germany

MSC/GAC Laminates and Composites GmbH & Co.                       Germany

MSC/GAC Beteiligungs GmbH                                         Germany

MSC/TEKNO Laminates and Composites LTDA                           Brazil
</TABLE>
#### CONROY v. BRILEY.

No. 35897.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 191 So.2d 601.
#### Alvin STANFORD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John H. HENRY et al., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3110.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 25, 1970.

*419Joel B. Dickinson, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

Donald Soileau and John Saunders, Mamou, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, HOOD and MILLER, JJ-

HOOD, Judge.

Plaintiff, a sweet potato farmer, instituted this suit to compel defendants, as officers and agents of the State Market Commission, to issue a weevil inspection certificate to him relating to his 1969 crop of potatoes. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of plaintiff, granting him the relief which he sought, and defendants have appealed.

A weevil inspection certificate was issued to plaintiff pursuant to the judgment rendered by the trial court, and plaintiff’s 1969 potato crop has been marketed. All parties agree that the issues presented in this suit are now moot and that the appeal should be dismissed.

For the reasons herein set out, the appeal taken herein is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
October 26, 2015 

Dear Mr. Wingo: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition, Docket 

No. FAA-2015-3480. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighterthan-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft 

manual(s). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/9/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
#### In the Matter of Gloria Joanna S., an Infant. Gloria P., Appellant; New York Founding Hospital, Respondent.

[736 NYS2d 590]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about September 22, 1999, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child upon a finding of mental illness, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing medical evidence supports the finding that notwithstanding progress, respondent’s mental illness is such as to put the child, who has special needs, at risk of becoming neglected were she to be returned to respondent now or in the foreseeable future (Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; [6] [a]; *see, Matter of Theone A.A.,*282 AD2d 290, *lv denied*96 NY2d 718, *cert dismissed sub nom. McReynolds v Little Flower Children’s Servs.,*534 US —, 122 S Ct 386). Given such medical evidence, and the testimony of petitioner agency’s social worker relating to the child’s special needs and their management by her longtime foster family, a dispositional hearing was not necessary to find that, notwithstanding respondent’s love for and desire to parent the child, adoption is in the child’s best interests *(see, Matter of Joyce T.,*65 NY2d 39, 43, 46; *Matter of Tyesha W.,*259 AD2d 349). We have considered respondent’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Lerner, Rubin, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.