alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83678/July 20, 2018]


Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Order Scheduling Filing of 
Statements on Review; in the Matter of the Investors Exchange LLC; for 
an Order Granting the Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Establish a 
New Optional Listing Category on the Exchange, ``LTSE Listings on IEX'' 
(File No. SR-IEX-2018-06)

    On March 15, 2018, Investors Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'' or 
``IEX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule 
change to establish a new optional listing category on the Exchange, 
referred to as the ``LTSE Listings on IEX'' or ``LTSE Listings.'' The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on April 2, 2018.\3\ On May 11, 2018, the Division of Trading and 
Markets, for the Commission pursuant to delegated authority, extended 
the time period for Commission action on the proposed rule change.\4\ 
On June 27, 2018, the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 1 to the 
proposed rule change.\5\ On June 29, 2018, the Division of Trading and 
Markets, for the Commission pursuant to delegated authority,\6\ 
approved the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82948 (March 27, 
2018), 83 FR 14074 (April 2, 2018) (SR-IEX-2018-06).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83217 (May 11, 
2018), 83 FR 22998 (May 17, 2018).
    \5\ See letter from Claudia Crowley, Chief Regulatory Officer, 
Investors Exchange LLC, dated June 27, 2018, available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-iex-2018-06/iex201806-3956434-167066.pdf.
    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30 3(a)(12).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83558 (June 29, 
2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice 431,\8\ the Commission is 
reviewing the delegated action, and the June 29, 2018 order is stayed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 201.431.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice 
431, that by August 20, 2018, any party or other person may file any 
additional statement.
    It is further ordered that the June 29, 2018 order approving the 
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 (SR-IEX-2018-06) 
shall remain stayed pending further order of the Commission.

    By the Commission.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15926 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### W. S. JACKSON and Beverly Jackson, his wife, Appellants, v. Billy M. ADKINS, d/b/a Mountaineer Motor Sales, and Paul Brooks, Appellees, and Northwestern National Insurance Co., Garnishee.

No. 70-391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Adams, George & Wood and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellants.

Moore, Welbaum, Zook & Jones and Neil A. Devaney, Miami, for garnishee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Seaboard Surety Co. v. Acme Wellpoint Corp., Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 688.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 142 

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for abortions, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2013 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for abortions, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hyde Amendment 

5 Codification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING FEDERALLY FUNDED ABORTIONS. 

7 Title 1 of the United States Code is amended by add8 ing at the end the following new chapter: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 142 IS

1 ‘‘CHAPTER 4—PROHIBITING FEDERALLY 

2 FUNDED ABORTIONS 

3 ‘‘SEC. 301. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING FOR ABORTIONS. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No funds authorized or appro5 priated by Federal law, and none of the funds in any trust 

6 fund to which funds are authorized or appropriated by 

7 Federal law, shall be expended for any abortion. 

8 ‘‘(b) HEALTH BENEFITS COVERAGE.—No funds au9 thorized or appropriated by Federal law, and none of the 

10 funds in any trust fund to which funds are authorized or 

11 appropriated by Federal law, shall be expended for health 

12 benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion. 

13 ‘‘SEC. 302. TREATMENT OF ABORTIONS RELATED TO RAPE, 

14 INCEST, OR PRESERVING THE LIFE OF THE 

15 MOTHER. 

16 ‘‘The limitations established in sections 301 shall not 

17 apply to an abortion— 

18 ‘‘(1) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of 

19 rape or incest; or 

20 ‘‘(2) in the case where a woman suffers from a 

21 physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, 

22 including a life-endangering physical condition 

23 caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that 

24 would, as certified by a physician, place the woman 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 142 IS

1 in danger of death unless an abortion is per2 formed.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                    GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                      Nine months ended September 26, 1998

                                   (Unaudited)


(In millions)

Earnings:
   Earnings before income taxes                                   $880
   Fixed charges:
      Minority interest in net earnings of
         consolidated subsidiaries (1)                              64
      Interest expense (2)                                          37
                                                                  ----
                                                                  $981
                                                                  ====

Fixed charges:
   Minority interest in net earnings of
      consolidated subsidiaries (3)                               $ 90
   Interest expense (2)                                             37
                                                                  ----
                                                                  $127
                                                                  ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                7.72
                                                                  ====


(1)  Minority  interest in net earnings of  consolidated  subsidiaries  includes
     dividends on subsidiary's preferred stock.

(2)  Interest  expense  includes an amount for one-third of the rental  expense,
     which the Company  believes is a reasonable  approximation  of the interest
     factor for such rentals.

(3)  The  fixed  charges  amount  for  minority  interest  in  net  earnings  of
     consolidated subsidiaries represents the pretax earnings amount which would
     be required to cover such fixed charges as calculated below:

                Subsidiary's Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
                -------------------------------------------------
                              100% - Income Tax Rate

     The  income  tax rate is based on the  relationship  of the  provision  for
     income taxes to earnings before income taxes for the respective period.


                                        9
#### Howard O’NEILL and Betty O’Neill, d/b/a Betty O. Houseboat Rentals, Appellants, v. Martin BLACKWELDER, Appellee.

No. 70-179.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1214 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1214

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2014
      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the United States 
             of America for use by the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``All-American Flag Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PURCHASE OF DOMESTICALLY MADE UNITED STATES 
              FLAGS FOR USE BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided under subsection (b), only such 
flags of the United States of America, regardless of size, that are 100 
percent manufactured in the United States, from articles, materials, or 
supplies 100 percent of which are grown, produced, or manufactured in 
the United States, may be acquired for use by the Federal Government.
    (b) Waiver.--The head of an executive agency may waive the 
requirement under subsection (a) on a case-by-case basis upon a 
determination that--
            (1) the application of the limitation would cause 
        unreasonable costs or delays to be incurred; or
            (2) application of the limitation would adversely affect a 
        United States company.
    (c) Amendment of Federal Acquisition Regulation.--Not later than 
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal 
Acquisition Regulatory Council established under section 1302 of title 
41, United States Code, shall amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation 
to implement this section.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Executive agency.--The term ``executive agency'' has 
        the meaning given the term in section 133 of title 41, United 
        States Code.
            (2) Federal acquisition regulation.--The term ``Federal 
        Acquisition Regulation'' has the meaning given the term in 
        section 106 of title 41, United States Code.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 2 shall apply to purchases of flags made on or after 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 4. CONSISTENCY WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.

    This Act shall be applied in a manner consistent with United States 
obligations under international agreements.

            Passed the Senate September 16, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Donald Earl WALLACE, Petitioner, v. ROBERT B. EHMANN, INC., and Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 42287.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 27, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1194 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1194

   To establish the Upper Mississippi River Environmental Education 
                                Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 1 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

    Mr. Durenberger (for himself and Mr. Wellstone) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To establish the Upper Mississippi River Environmental Education 
                                Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE.

    It is the purpose of this Act to establish the Upper Mississippi 
River Environmental Education Center that shall serve as both an 
education center for elementary children and adults as well as an 
interpretation area depicting the environmental issues related to the 
Upper Mississippi River Valley.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.

    The Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service is 
authorized, in accordance with the provisions of this Act, to provide 
financial assistance to pay the costs of construction and equipment for 
an Upper Mississippi River Environmental Education Center (hereafter in 
this Act referred to as the ``Center'').

SEC. 3. LOCATION OF CENTER.

    The Center shall be located in Winona, Minnesota.

SEC. 4. APPLICATION FOR ASSISTANCE.

    No financial assistance may be made under this Act unless the 
application is made to the Director of the United States Fish and 
Wildlife Service at such time, in such manner, and containing or 
accompanied by such information as the Director may reasonably require.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated $7,500,000 
to carry out the provisions of this Act.
    (b) Availability.--Funds appropriated pursuant to the authority of 
subsection (a) shall remain available until expended.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                             THREE MONTHS
                                        YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED      ENDED
                                        DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31,   MARCH 31,
                                           1996          1997          1998          1999          2000          2001
                                        -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Earnings:
  Net loss ...........................  $   (48,598)  $   (43,887)  $   (59,316)  $   (99,867)  $  (117,801)  $   (39,322)
  Add:  Amount of
     previously capitalized
     interest amortized                          --            --           252         2,288         2,288           572
  Add: Fixed charges .................       35,041        38,499        43,798        65,310        65,649        17,618
                                        -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
  Adjusted earnings                         (13,557)       (5,388)      (15,266)      (32,269)      (49,864)      (21,132)

Fixed charges:
  Interest in
     indebtedness ....................       32,368        36,672        52,645        63,452        63,418        16,734
  Amortization of debt
     issuance costs                           2,143           844         1,172         1,291         1,992           540
  Interest portion
     of rental and
     lease expense ...................          530           983         1,428           567           239           344
                                        -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
  Fixed charges                              35,041        38,499        55,245        65,310        65,649        17,618

Deficiency of
  earnings available to
  cover fixed charges ................  $   (48,598)  $   (43,887)  $   (70,511)  $   (97,579)  $  (115,513)  $   (38,750)
                                        ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========

Earnings to fixed charges ratio                  --            --            --            --            --            --
</TABLE>


(1)      The fixed charge adjustment to earnings excludes $11.4 million of
         capitalized interest.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,669
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,046
<INVENTORY>                                     31,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,984
<PP&E>                                         288,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 515,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,238
<BONDS>                                        309,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           874
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   515,430
<SALES>                                        138,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,717
<CGS>                                           93,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   289
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,576)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,475)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,461)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
#### Almond H. THOMAS and Irene Thomas, his wife, Appellants, v. ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, and Henry Roberts, Appellees.

No. 67-968.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 30, 1969.

Taylor, Brion, Buker, Hames, Greene & Whitworth and Robert J. Paterno, Miami, for appellants.

Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam and Fred R. Ober, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on July 23, 1968 (212 So.2d 920) affirming the summary final judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed July 30, 1969 (226 So.2d 100) and mandate dated September IS, 1969, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment of affirmance;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on August 28, 1968 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed July 23, 1968 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the summary final judgment of the circuit court appealed from in this cause is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of this court. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
-  HIPAA for Professionals 
-  Regulatory Initiatives 
-  Privacy      -  Summary of the Privacy Rule 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Combined Text of All Rules 
  -  HIPAA Related Links 
-  Security      -  Summary of the Security Rule 
  -  Security Guidance  
  -  Cyber Security Guidance 
-  Breach Notification      -  Breach Reporting 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  Regulation History 
-  Compliance & Enforcement      -  Enforcement Rule 
  -  Enforcement Process 
  -  Enforcement Data 
  -  Resolution Agreements 
  -  Case Examples 
  -  Audit 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  State Attorneys General 
-  Special Topics      -  HIPAA and Part 2 
  -  Change Healthcare Cybersecurity Incident FAQs 
  -  HIPAA and COVID-19 
  -  HIPAA and Reproductive Health        -  HIPAA and Final Rule Notice 
  -  HIPAA and Telehealth 
  -  HIPAA and FERPA 
  -  Research 
  -  Public Health 
  -  Emergency Response 
  -  Health Information Technology 
  -  Health Apps 
-  Patient Safety      -  Statute & Rule        -  PSQIA Statute 
    -  Patient Safety Rule 
  -  Enforcement 
  -  Guidance 
-  Covered Entities & Business Associates      -  Business Associate Contracts 
  -  Business Associates 
-  Training & Resources 
-  FAQs for Professionals 
-  Other Administrative Simplification Rules 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# Coastal  Ear, Nose, and Throat 

Coastal Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT), located in Ormond Beach, Florida, failed to provide timely access to medical records after lawful requests for such records from a patient. Coastal ENT has agreed to take corrective actions and has paid $20,000 to settle a potential violation of the HIPAA Privacy Rule's right of access standard
                          - Read the HHS Press Release
                          - Read the Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan

Content last reviewed July 15, 2022
252 La. 173

#### Mrs. Sheba L. Oswald WAPPLER v. Mrs. Georgia Marie Clarke BRAUCHT et vir.

No. 49236.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1968.

In re: Mrs. Sheba L. Oswald Wappler applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 209 So.2d 603.

Application not considered having been filed too late.