SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST 

 (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V)  SIP Submitted by: PA DEP/Allegheny County Health Department  Date Submitted: June 4, 2008  Subject: Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program Completeness Review Completed by: Sharon McCauley  Date Completed: August 21, 2008 Administrative Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 

1. June 26 letter from designee - Secretary PA forwarding June 4 letter from Allegheny Countyletter dated May 7, 2008 from ACHD addressincompliance with Section 110 (a)(2)(c), (D)(i) anhour ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS 

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 

2. Certification of Approval and Adoption 

5/15/08) 

 Section 2102.07 of Article XXI Allegheny CDept. Rules 

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 

3. Plan revision submitted through the PA DEP

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, 

4. 
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 

5. 

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 

6. Public notice and public hearing held on reguof May 7, 2008 accompanied the submittal for acounty’s compliance with Section 110 (a)(2)(c), for the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS 

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 

7. Certification enclosed 

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 

8. No comments were received 

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. PSD areas 2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 

2. PSD areas in Allegheny County 

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 

3. N/A 
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 

4. IBR of PSD as of July 1, 2007. Also letter d2008 addressing the county’s compliance with S(a)(2)(c), (D)(i) and (J) for the 8-hour ozone and NAAQS 

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 

5. N/A 

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 

6. IBR of PSD Regs 

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 

7. IBR of PSD Regs 

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 

8. IBR of PSD Regs 

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 

9. IBR of PSD Regs. Also May 7, 2008 Countaddressing the county’s compliance with Sectio(D)(i) and (J) for the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 N

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 

10. N/A