alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022128EN.01002502.xml

| 21.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/25

---

Order of the General Court of 14 January 2022 — Alauzun and Others v Commission and EMA

(Case T-418/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Amendment to the conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Comirnaty - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - No interest in bringing proceedings - No direct concern - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 128/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Virginie Alauzun (Saint-Cannat, France) and 774 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: F. Di Vizio, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, L. Haasbeek and K. Mifsud-Bonnicci, acting as Agents), European Medicines Agency (represented by: S. Drosos, C. Schultheiss and S. Marino, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment, first, of Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 4034 final of 31 May 2021 amending the conditional marketing authorisation granted by Implementing Decision C(2020) 9598 final for ‘Comirnaty — COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified)’, a medicinal product for human use, and, second, of the EMA’s opinion of 28 May 2021.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Ms Virginie Alauzun and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Virginie Alauzun and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.

---
CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE00110 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

Administration for Community Living, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Representatives of the Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AIDD), Administration for Community Living (ACL), will be conducting a federal review of the Puerto Rico State Council on Developmental Disabilities (SCDD) and the Protection and Advocacy System (P&A) on September 17-21, 2018.

AIDD is soliciting comments from interested parties on your experiences with the work, program, and strategies employed by P&A and SDCC in meeting the needs of individuals with developmental disabilities and their families in Puerto Rico. You are encouraged to share your experiences by way of any of the following methods:

*Email: Clare.huerta@acl.hhs.gov.*

*Telephone:*                         202-795-7301.                    

*Mail Comments To:*                         Clare Huerta, Program Specialist, Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Administration for Community Living, 330 C Street SW, 1st Floor, Washington, DC 20201.                    

Comments should be received by September 10, 2018 in order to be included in the final report.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clare Barnett Huerta, Administration for Community Living, Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Office of Program Support, 330 C Street SW, 1st Floor, Washington, DC 20201, 202-795-7301.

Dated: July 12, 2018.

Mary Lazare,

Principal Deputy Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2018-15905 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4154-01-P
#### KILPATRICK FORD, INC. v. R. V. ALEXANDER and A. M. Alexander.

No. 53204.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 1, 1973.

In re: Kilpatrick Ford, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Jackson. 271 So.2d 388.

Application denied; there is no error in the judgment of the court of appeal.
## 

EXHIBIT 23.1: CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-92551,
333-94579, 333-94581 and 333-32164), Form S-4 (No. 333-92857) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-30767,
333-79713, 333-95203, 333-32996, and 333-40890) of Great Plains Software, Inc. of our report dated June 22, 2000 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 7, 2000

63

---

## QuickLinks
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Robert R. Galvin,  Chief  Financial  Officer of NuCo2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2002
of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                       /s/ Robert R. Galvin
                                                       --------------------
                                                       Robert R. Galvin
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       February 14, 2003
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-5794
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GARRETT C. VICK, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-19) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: September 30, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sydney K. L. West, HORNE, WEST & MCMURTRIE, Gloucester, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Robert E. Bradenham II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Garrett C. Vick entered a guilty plea to distributing 9.748 grams of crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a), (b) (West 1981 & Supp. 1996), and 18 U.S.C . § 2 (1988). The district court sentenced Vick to fifty-one months incarceration, ordered five years of supervised release, and imposed a $50 special assessment. In his plea agreement, Vick agreed to waive his right to appeal any sentence within the statutory maximum on any ground.Vick now seeks to appeal his sentence by challenging the constitutionality of the 100-to-1 ratio of crack to powder cocaine. We dismiss the appeal. During the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, the court questioned Vick about the waiver provision contained in the plea agreement, and Vick stated that he understood the provision. A defendant may waive his statutory right to appeal his sentence if the waiver is knowing and voluntary. United States v. Marin , 961 F.2d 493, 496 (4th Cir. 1992). For a waiver to be knowing and voluntary, the district court should specifically question the defendant about the waiver provision before accepting his plea. Whether the waiver is effective is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. Based on Vick's statements at the plea colloquy, we find that the waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily.* Had we found that the waiver was ineffective, we would affirm the sentence. See United States v. Hayden , 85 F.3d 153, 157- 58 (4th Cir. 1996) (holding that statute providing higher penalties for cocaine base than cocaine powder not unconstitutional and finding that recent report by United States Sentencing Commission,rejected by Congress, did not change court's view of crack-topowder sentencing disparity). 3 We therefore dismiss the appeal. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,004
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,154
<PP&E>                                          15,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,361
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,566)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,071
<SALES>                                          3,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,787
<CGS>                                              662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34907-34908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10473]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``Armenia!'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Armenia!,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about 
September 20, 2018, until on or about January 13, 2019, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbc8ded8cfd2d4d5898f8e82fbc8cfdacfde95dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e192848295888e8fd3d5d4d8a19295809584cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me

[[Page 34908]]

by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 
12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring 
Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), 
Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of 
Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-10 of July 6, 2018.

Jennifer Z. Galt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-15656 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
2
Exhibit 1
Form 10-KSB
VideoPlex, Inc.




                  CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                               OF
                         VIDEOPLEX, INC.

                               E-1
<PAGE>

                  CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                               OF
                         VIDEOPLEX, INC.

     This is to certify that, there is hereby organized a
corporation under and by virtue of N.J.S. 14A:1-1 et seq., the
"New Jersey Business Corporation Act."

     1.   The name of the corporation is VIDEOPLEX, INC.

     2.   The address (and zip code) of this corporation's
     initial registered office is

               Raritan Plaza III
               Raritan Center
               Edison, N.J.  08837

     and the name of this corporation initial registered agent at
     such address is

               Martin S. Horak

     3.   The purposes for which this corporation is organized
are:

        To engage in any activity within the purposes for which corporations
may be organized under the "New Jersey Business Corporation Act." N.J.S.
14A:1-1 et seq.

     4.   The aggregate number of shares which the corporation
shall have authority to issue is:

          One HUNDRED (100) SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK, NO PAR VALUE.

     5.   The first Board of Directors of this corporation shall
consist of ONE Director(s) and the name and address of each
person who is to serve as such Director is:

    Name                 Address                    Zip Code
Martin S. Horak          Raritan Plaza III
                         Raritan Center
                         Edison, New Jersey            08837

     6.   The name and address of each incorporator is:

    Name                 Address                    Zip Code
Martin S. Horak          Raritan Plaza III
                         Raritan Center
                         Edison, New Jersey            08837

                               E-2
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each individual incorporator, each being
over the age of eighteen years, has signed this Certificate; or
if the incorporator be a corporation, has caused this Certificate
to be signed by its authorized officers, this 11 day of August,
1983.

                                   /s/ Martin S. Horak

                               E-3
<PAGE>
#### VAFIDES v. DAVLIN.

No. 35768.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Appeal dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF AMBASSADORS INTERNATIONAL, INC.



|1. | Ambassadors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Ambassadors Cruise Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Cypress Reinsurance, Ltd, a Bermuda corporation
|-- | -----------------------------------------------



|4. | BellPort Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | --------------------------------------------



|5. | American West Steamboat Company, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ambassadors Cruise Group, LLC
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|6. | EN Boat LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ambassadors Cruise Group, LLC
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|7. | QW Boat LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ambassadors Cruise Group, LLC
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION**Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Vitran CorporationInc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Vitran Corporation Inc. on Form 10-Q for thethree months ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Vitran CorporationInc.        Date: April 25, 2007 By:  /s/   RICHARD E. GAETZ    Richard E. Gaetz    President andChief Executive Officer            By:  /s/   SEAN P. WASHCHUK    Sean P. Washchuk    Vice President Finance and
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 6

- 00 383

- C V

Style: In re International Agencies Co., Ltd., Relator

Date motion filed * : June 1 , 201 6

Type of motion: Unopposed First M otion f o r Exten sion of Time to File His Response to

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Part y filing motion s : Real Part y in Interest Jon Malone, Court

- Appointed Receiver

Document to be filed: Response to Petition

Is appeal accelerated? Yes (original proceeding).

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: June 2 , 2016

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due D ate: June 2 , 2016

Date Requested: June 1 5 , 2016

Ordered that motion i s:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: June 1 5 , 2016.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley



Date: June 2, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      28,540,444
<SECURITIES>                                   101,981
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,145,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (544,747)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,920,031
<PP&E>                                      16,140,814
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,040,577)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             160,423,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,476,225
<BONDS>                                        996,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       36,224,441
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       428,933
<OTHER-SE>                                 103,619,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               160,423,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,694,450
<CGS>                                       19,650,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,650,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            63,849,706
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (49,470,380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (49,470,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (49,470,380)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.55)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6087

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAFAEL JAIMES-JAIMES,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:01-cr-00245-1)

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes appeals a district court order
denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have reviewed

the record and the district court order and find no reversible
error. We affirm for the reasons cited by the district court.

United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes , No. 1:01-cr-00245-1 (M.D.N.C.
Dec. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED