alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 15, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: February 4, 2005 |  | /s/ Roger M. Laverty                 
|                        |  | Roger M. Laverty                     
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



Note: A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and will be retained by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

I, Ronald A. Martell, Chief Executive Officer of Poniard
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (12 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/ RONALD A.
MARTELL                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Ronald A. Martell Chief
Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.18


                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                             NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT


         This First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement ("Amendment") is
entered effective as of the 1st day of December, 2006, by and between ORION
HEALTHCORP, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and PHOENIX LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation ("Investor").

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, the Company and Investor entered into a certain Note Purchase
Agreement dated September 8, 2006, (the "Note Purchase Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, Section 9.10(b) of the Note Purchase Agreement provides that
it may be amended in a writing signed by the Company and Investor.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in order to induce the Company and the Investor to
consummate the transactions contemplated by the Note Purchase Agreement, and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the Company and Investor agree as follows:

         1.   Clause (d) of Section 4.10 of the Note Purchase Agreement shall be
amended to refer to Schedule 3.1(p).

         2.   Except as explicitly set forth in this Amendment, the Company and
Investor hereby reaffirm the Note Purchase Agreement in its entirety.

         3.   This Amendment shall be construed and enforced under the laws of
the State of New York without regard to conflicts of laws.

         4.   This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will
be an original as regards the party whose name appears thereon and all of which
together will constitute one and the same instrument.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Investor hereto have executed this
Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement as of the date first written above.

                                             ORION HEALTHCORP, INC., a Delaware
                                             corporation



                                             By:  /s/ Terrence L. Bauer
                                                --------------------------------
                                             Name: Terrence L. Bauer
                                             Title: President and Chief
                                                    Executive Officer



                                             PHOENIX LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
                                             a New York corporation


                                             By:  /s/ John H. Beers
                                                --------------------------------
                                             Name: John H. Beers
                                             Title: Vice President
MICROTECH MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

                          Secretarial Certificate


     I, J. Royce Renfrow, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected Corporate
Secretary  and the keeper of the record of MICROTECH  MEDICAL  SYSTEMS,  INC., a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado,  and
that the  following  is a true and  correct  copy of  certain  resolutions  duly
adopted at a meeting of the Board of  Directors  thereof,  convened  and held in
accordance  with the  By-Laws of said  Corporation  on the 16th day of  October,
1996, and that such resolutions are now in full force and effect:

     "RESOLVED,  that the corporate  officers are hereby  authorized to issue to
Glacier  Valley  Holding  Corporation  six  million  two  twenty-five   thousand
(6,225,000)  shares of common stock in the Corporation,  restricted  pursuant to
Rule 144 pursuant to Agreement of September 30, 1996,  in partial  consideration
of the  Corporation  s  purchase  of a portion  of the  Community  at Bear Creek
Subdivision.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed my name as Corporate  Secretary and have
caused the  corporate  seal of said  Corporation  to be hereunto  affixed,  this
_______ day of October, 1996.


                              _____________________________________
                              Corporate Secretary


Sworn to and subscribed before me, this _____________ day of October, 1996.


                              _____________________________________
                              Notary Public
                              _____________________________________
                              My Commission Expires
<PAGE>
NOTE:  Original of the Amendment is attached here.
EXHIBIT 21
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                        --------------------------


                                                               STATE OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                             INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
Cooperstown and Charlotte Valley Railway Corporation           New York
     
Central New York Railroad Corporation                          New York

Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Corporation         New York
     
Lackawaxen and Stourbridge Railroad Corporation                Pennsylvania
     
Delaware Otsego Equipment Corporation                          New York

Fonfulco, Inc.                                                 New York

The New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway Corporation      New Jersey
     
Susquehanna Properties, Inc.                                   New York

Staten Island Railway Corporation                              New York

Delta Warehousing Corporation                                  New Jersey

Rahway Valley Company, Lessee                                  New Jersey

Rahway Valley Railroad Company                                 New Jersey
                                   
Susquehanna Bulk Systems, Inc.                                 New Jersey

                                    - 48 -
EXHIBIT 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.033-14531, No. 033-48395, No. 033-54483, No. 033-64998, No. 033-68336, No. 333-38435, No.333-109345, No. 333-109346, No. 333-04775, No. 333-04823, No. 333-38435, No. 333-62087, No.333-62103, No. 333-95409, No. 333-41328, No. 333-71502 and No. 333-97713) pertaining to employeeequity compensation plans of Novell, Inc. of our report dated November 16, 2004, except withrespect to the matter discussed in the second paragraph of Note E relating to fiscal year 2004, asto which the date is May 25, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Novell, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended October 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPBoston, Massachusetts
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1316 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 138
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1316

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2013

Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                             July 18, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Seniors' Access to 
Medicare Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVISORY BOARD.

    Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), sections 3403 and 10320 of 
such Act (including the amendments made by such sections) are repealed, 
and any provision of law amended by such sections is hereby restored as 
if such sections had not been enacted into law.
                                                       Calendar No. 138

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1316

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 18, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
#### Irwin *versus*Wickersham.

If a point of law be reserved on the trial of a cause, the point and the facts upon which it arises must be stated upon the record in order to authorize the Court to enter judgment *non obstante veredicto.*

Error to the District Court of *Allegheny county.*

This was an action of covenant brought to recover ground-rent alleged to be due to plaintiff on a lot in the city of Pittsburgh.

On the trial of the cause, defendant’s counsel submitted four points in writing, requesting certain instructions to the jury, all of which the Court answered in the negative, and directed the jury to find for the plaintiff, and *reserved the points.*Neither the points reserved, nor the facts upon which such points were founded, were stated upon the record.

The Court afterwards entered judgment for the defendant *non obstante veredicto.*

This ruling of the Court was assigned for error.

*Bigham*and *Leslie,*for plaintiff in error.

*Shinn,*contra.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Black, J. —

After the evidence in this case had been, gone through with on both sides, the Court directed the jury to find a verdict in favour of the plaintiff, which was done of course. After-wards a judgment was entered for the defendant, *non obstante veredicto,*upon points said to be *reserved.*But how reserved? They are not specified. Nobody can tell what they are from anything that appears on the record. Perhaps it was meant to reserve the written propositions submitted by counsel. In the absence of any facts to apply them to, they are mere abstractions. The truth of the case is in no way ascertained. It is not admitted by the parties; the jury did not pass upon it, and the Court could not. *317What does it matter whether the plaintiff or defendant was right on the law, since there is not a fact found to which it refers ? We repeat again, that' if a point of law is to he reserved, it must be done by stating on the record the facts on which it arises.

Judgment reversed and *venire facias de novo*awarded.
Exhibit 32.1


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Orion
HealthCorp, Inc. (the "small business issuer"), hereby certifies as follows:

         The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the small business issuer (the
"Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small
business issuer.

Dated this 2nd day of April, 2007.

/s/ Terrence L. Bauer
----------------------------------------------
Terrence L. Bauer, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and
will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### First National Bank & Trust Co. *v.*Jaffe.

Argued April 30, 1934.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldbige, Stadtfeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*326
      *Maurice L. Avner,*for appellant.

*A. L. Wolk,*and with him *Benjamin Diamond,*for appellee.

July 13, 1934:

Opinion by

Baldkige, J.,

This appeal is from the decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, sitting in equity, filed in No. 868, October Term, 1932.

We have this day filed an opinion in an appeal of the First National Bank and Trust Company of Tarentum from the same decree, wherein we upheld the validity of the assignment of certain bailment leases and accounts by Frank Jaffe to that company, and ordered an accounting by Shenkan of any moneys in his hands collected thereon by him. We agree with the appellant’s contention that the learned court below was without authority in attempting to adjudicate the rights of creditors of the Jaffe estate, who were not parties to the bill, nor for whom relief was sought. The main contention involved, however, was the right of this appellant to an accounting, which we decided adversely to him. Nothing is to be gained by a further discussion of what was said in that opinion.

The appeal is dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Exhibit 12.1
  CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of BT Group plc;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to
be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys
auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Ian LivingstonName: Ian LivingstonTitle: Chief Executive
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 21
                                                                 ----------

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



Name of Subsidiary                               State or other jurisdiction of
------------------                               incorporation or organization
                                                 -------------------------------


PictureTel Securities Corporation                Massachusetts

PictureTel International Corporation             Delaware

PictureTel Technology Corporation                Delaware

PictureTel Service Corporation                   Delaware

PicTel Videoconferencing Systems Corporation     Delaware

PictureTel Australia Pty. Ltd.                   Australia

PictureTel International Ltda.                   Brazil

PictureTel GmbH                                  Germany

PictureTel Italy S.r.l.                          Italy

PictureTel Japan, KK.                            Japan

PictureTel Mexico S.A. de C.V.                   Mexico

PictureTel Service Ltd. Pte.                     Singapore

PictureTel Scandinavia AB                        Sweden

PictureTel (Schweiz) AG                          Switzerland

PictureTel UK Limited                            United Kingdom

PictureTel FSC, Ltd.                             United States Virgin Islands

PictureTel Venezuela SA                          Venezuela

MultiLink, Inc.                                  Massachusetts

MultiLink Europe Ltd.                            United Kingdom

MultiLink UK Limited                             United Kingdom



          All the subsidiaries are wholly owned (except for director's
qualifying shares in certain countries), either directly or indirectly, by the
company and may do business under their own name as well as the name PictureTal
Corporation
261 La. 821

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Amos W. McINTYRE.

No. 52428.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 1972.

In re: The State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ granted. (See order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable John S. Covington, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of October, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A. M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

DIXON, J.,

dissents from the granting of this writ. Defendant is charged with the “theft of entertainment services” by entering a football game with the i. d. card of another. A necessary element of theft is the intent to deprive the other of the object permanently. LSU can still entertain with football. There are numerous lawful ways the university may prevent the transfer of i. d.’s, but nothing has been stolen in this case.
#### WEISS v. STONE.

No. 38574.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Appeals dismissed without opinion. 220 So.2d 403.
#### Luis ACEVEDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-690.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 5, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Bruno GRIGNOLO, Petitioner, v. Charles P. CARROLL, and Greenfield Real Estate Investment Trust, Respondents.

No. 70-810.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 31, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 21, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.