alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     14,839,386
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 938,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                  224,901
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           18,290,861
<PP&E>                                      1,457,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                636,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             28,491,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      24,256,755
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          65,704
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       99,691
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,740,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               28,491,810
<SALES>                                    17,777,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           17,777,419
<CGS>                                      12,851,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              15,682,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (171,662)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             35,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,231,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                  762,571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,468,655
<DISCONTINUED>                            (1,798,894)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                (330,239)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.09)



</TABLE>
No. 00-1098.

#### Beverley *v.*Oto, Executor of the Estate of Oto, Deceased.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000757545
<NAME> 84A.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         162,473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  330,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               492,817
<PP&E>                                      18,207,994
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,264,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,436,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,391,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,436,385
<SALES>                                      1,984,346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,050,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,267,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,782,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,782,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,782,138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    67.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

d1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143652

DIANE BIES-RICE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143652 COA: 304313 Wayne CC: 08-100728-DO ALVIN FOSTER RICE, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the July 12, 2011 and August 16, 2011 orders of th e Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions pres ented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### WILLIAM LAWS, d. b. *vs.*THOMAS A. JONES, p. b.

In an action for taxes, the record should show that the plaintiff was a collector, and that the defendant had removed from the county, or died, without paying the tax.

Certiorari to Justice Tindal.

“ Record, to wit: Thomas A. ‘Jones *vs.*William Laws, who formerly acted as agent for Newton Rust. Summons for taxes issued the 1st. Febi’uary, 1838, returnable 24th February, demand $3 39. The parties appeared, and after hearing the allegations of the parties, judgment in favor of plaintiff for $3 39 debt, and 56 cents costs.

The exceptions wen' — 1. That the defendant was not liable to a suit against him as the former agent of Rust. 3. That the claim was for a tax, and it does not appear that Newton Rust had removed from the county, or had died without paying the same; and 3. That it does not appear that the plaintiff was a collector of county rates and levies.

*346
      *Robinson,*for plaintiff in error.

The court considered the judgment and proceedings erroneous on all three of the grounds taken, and

Reversed the judgment
#### STATE of Florida ex rel., BISCAYNE KENNEL CLUB, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Relators, v. Thomas A. TESTA, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Dade County, Florida; and Florida Thoroughbred Breeders Association, Inc., a Florida corporation, Respondents.

No. 71-1187.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                      19,306,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              205,759,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,772,064
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             280,735,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    238,431,056
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,567
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,864,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               280,735,120
<SALES>                                      9,609,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,609,333
<CGS>                                        3,879,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,879,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,378,646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,156,174
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,106,167
<INCOME-TAX>                                   403,751
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            702,416
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   702,416
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
### NU M BER 13- 91- 0002 8-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ TA LMAGE M. GU Y A ND SOLB . WE IL, III, A pp ellan ts, v . DA M SON OILC ORP ORA TION , ETA L., A pp ellees .

____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ On ap pe al f rom th e 2 3rd Dist rict C ou rt o f W ha rton C ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ____ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ju stice s Yañ ez, R od rigu ez, an d Be na v ide s M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam The la st act iv ity

i n thi s a ppeal occu rred on M ay 7, 2001, w hen app ell antsfil ed a moti on to retur n the ca se to t h e W har ton C ounty

D is tr ict C our

t for final dete rmi nati on. Si nce Ma y

7, 2001, there hasbeen no acti v ity i n thi s a p p e a l. O n M arch 19, 2 009, the Court orde red the parties to f ile an ad v isory regarding the statu s of the a p p e a l a n d , if appl ic abl e, a moti on to rein sta te t he appe al or a mot ion to dis mis s t he appe al.2

The par ti es hav e resp onded to the order by i nformin g the Cou rtthatthey no l ong er d e s ire t o p ro s e c u t e t h e ir a p p e a l a n d d o n o to p p o s e d is m is s in g t h e c a s e . Ac c o rd in gl y, we re ins tate and di smi ssthe appeal for want o f pros ecut ion
. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .3(b). Other pendi ng moti ons, i f any , are di smi ss ed asmoot.
P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 30th day

of Apr il , 200 9.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Caryl P. ShepherdCaryl P. ShepherdChief Accounting Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial 
Officer)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 14, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 14, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A0351. THOMAS A. ORIANS v. JASON CHIAN et al..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### Harry P. BUTTS v. STATE.

No. 36651.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Appeal dismissed without opinion. 200 So.2d 283.
252 La. 111

#### BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the FIREMEN’S PENSION AND RELIEF FUND OF the CITY OF NEW ORLEANS et al. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, the Council of the City of New Orleans, John J. Petre et al.

No. 49184.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1968.

In re: City of New Orleans, the Council of the City of New Orleans, John J. Petre et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 207 So.2d 166.

Writ refused. Relators have a remedy by appeal in the event of an adverse judgment on the merits.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Balance Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statments of Cash Flows
and Notes thereto incorporated in Part I, Item 1 of this Form
10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by refernce to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,277
<PP&E>                                       1,248,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,207,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,287,694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,794
<COMMON>                                         7,705
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,910,595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,207,788
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (176,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (176,947)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (176,947)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### James GILLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-178.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 19, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael MANSO, a/k/a Patrick Fusillo, Michael Vierthaler, Edward Kenny, a/k/a Dale Roberts, Steve Hill, and Jeffrey Roberts.

No. 61136.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 7, 1977.

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted in part. The ruling of the trial judge is set aside and the case is remanded for a new hearing on the motion to suppress. When the mover has shown that the evidence was seized without a search warrant, the burden of proof is on the State. *Vale v. Louisiana,*399 U.S. 30, 90 S.Ct. 1969, 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970). *State v. Lain,*La., 347 So.2d 167 (1977). In all other respects, the application is denied.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion that the evidence is adequate as to the stop of the first truck and the motion to suppress as to that search and seizure should be denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jun-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   May-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,200,014
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,547,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                   330,615
<INVENTORY>                                    16,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,747,899
<PP&E>                                         10,205,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,925,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,538,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,199,255
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,690,571
<COMMON>                                       1,216
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,690,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,538,548
<SALES>                                        11,312,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,881,469
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,956,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             354,960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                569,681
<INCOME-TAX>                                   307,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            262,681
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   262,681
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .16
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Shelter Properties VII Limited Partnership 1997 Year-End 10-KSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000758009         
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES VII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997   
<CASH>                                             612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          21,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,906   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,742   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,116     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,163    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,742    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,806    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,683    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 905    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       123     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.03<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>