MATTER OF Y —J --G— 

In VISA PETITION Proceedings 

VP 16-1-23207 

Decided by Board October 4, 1960 

Preference quota status—Transfer to nonquota status—Act of September 22, 

1959—Retention of parent-child relationship not affected by marriage or age 

of child. 

(1) Approved third preference petition which lapsed on June 2, 1959, when 

beneficiary "child" of resident alien petitioner attained age 21 may be revalidated ab initio under September 22, 1959 amendment to Immigration 

and Nationality Act enlarging third preference category to include unmarried sons or daughters of resident aliens. 

(2) Beneficiary is also eligible for transfer of third preference status to nonquota status under section 4 or 6 of Act of September 22, 1959. Proviso in 

latter sections regarding retention of relationship and status Is satisfied so 

long as the basic family relationship, which is unaffected by the age or 

marriage of the child, continues unchanged. 

BEFORE THE BOARD 

DISCUSSION: The case was certified by the District Director, 

Los Angeles District, to the Assistant Commissioner, Examinations, 

who in turn has certified his decision of April 11, 1960, that the 

beneficiary be considered a nonquota alien pursuant to section 6 of 

the Act of September 22, 1959. 

The petitioner, a native and citizen of China, 49 years old, a permanent resident alien, who was admitted to the United States on 

Mai,10, 1955, in possession of a special nonquota immigrant visa 

issued under the Ref-Ogee Relief Act of 1953, as amended, filed a 

-visa petition on December 10, 1957, to accord the beneficiary preference status pursuant to section 203(a) (3) of the Immigration and 

Nationality Act. The beneficiary is the male child of the petitioner, 

a native and citizen of China, born ,Tuna 2, 1938. On January 31, 

1958, the visa petition was approved for a third preference status 

under section 203(a) (3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

as the minor unmarried child of an alien lawfully admitted to the 

United States for permanent residence. However, the beneficiary 

became 21 years of age on June 2, 1959, and approval of the visa 

petition was automatically revoked pursuant to 8 CFR 206.1(b) (5). 
The beneficiary's name was removed from the third preference quota 

waiting list and inserted on the waiting list of nonpreference quota 

immigrants chargeable to the quota for Chinese persons. 

Section 2 of the Act of September 22, 1959, amended section 203 

(a) (3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act so as to extend 

third preference eligibility to unmarried sons and daughters of permanent resident aliens. The term "sons and daughters" includes 

persons over 21 years of age as well as a "child" as defined in section 

101(b) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.' Accordingly, 

under the provisions of section 203(a) (3) of the Immigration and 

Nationality Act as amended by section 2 of the Act of September 

22, 1959, the beneficiary, who is now over 21 years of age, is under 

the present law eligible for third preference quota status and approval of the petition may in any event be revalidated a initio for 

that category. 

While there is no doubt that the beneficiary is qualified for third 

preference status, a further question to be resolved is whether he 

may be considered as eligible for nonquota status under the provisions of section 4 or section 6 of the Act of September 22, 1959. 

Section 4 of the amendatory Act of September 22, 1959 provides 

as follows: 

Any alien who (1) is registered on a consular waiting list pursuant to 

section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (66 Stat. 179) under 

a priority date earlier than December 31, 1953, and (2) is eligible for a quota 

immigrant status under the provisions of set:lion 203(a) (2), (3), or (4) of such 

Act on the basis of a petition approved by the Attorney General prior to 

January 1, 1959, and the spouse and the children of such alien, shall be held 

to be nonquota immigrants and, if otherwise admissible under the provisions 

of the Immigration and Nationality Act, shall be issued nonquota immigrant 

visas: Provided, That, upon his application for an immigrant visa, and for his 

admission into the United States, the alien is found to have retained his 

relationship to the petitioner, and status, as established in the approved 

petition. 

Section 6 of the same Act provides as follows: 

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 3 and 20 of the Refugee Relief 

Act of 1953, as amended, special nonquota immigrant visas may be issued to 

aliens eligible to enter the United States for permanent residence under all 

the applicable provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act: Provided, 

That each such alien is found to be the beneficiary of a visa petition approved by the .111.ttorney General pursuant to section 202(a) (2) and (2) and 

section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act prior to January 1, 1959, 

and such petition was filed by a person lawfully admitted into the United 

States under the provisions of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953, as amended: 

Prnoidad further, That, upon his application for an immigrant vies, and fur 

his admission into the United States, the alien is found to have retained his 

relationship to the petitioner, and status, as established in the approved 

petition. 

122 CFR 42.32. 

93 
The original visa petition according the beneficiary third preference status was initially approved on January 31, 1958, and it is 

apparent that he satisfies the prerequisites of section 4 of the Act 

of September 22, 1959. In addition, it has been established that the 

petitioner was admitted to the United States under the provisions 

of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953, as amended, and The requirements of section 6 of the same Act also appear to be satisfied. The 

issue, however, is in the construction to be placed upon the provisos 

to section 4 and to section 6, containing identical language to the 

effect that it must be found that the alien has "retained his relationship to the petitioner, and status, as established in the approved 

petition." There is no controversy as to the relationship which is 

conceded to be established. The Service finds that the beneficiary 

has the requisite status in that the significant word relevant to 

status is "unmarried." The Assistant Commissioner in his order of 

April 11, 1960, traces the history of the legislative action, the final 

draft of section 4 changing "the unmarried son or daughter under 

21 years of age" to "the children of such alien"; and section 2 of 

which changes section 203(a) (3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act from "children" to "unmarried sons and daughters" 

thereby granting adult unmarried beneficiaries the same preference 

as minor unmarried children. 

The Department of State in a memorandum dated June 30, 1960, 

and in oral argument before this Board expresses the view that the 

proper interpretation to be placed upon the word "status" contained 

in the provisos to sections 4 and 6 of the Act of September 22, 1959 

is that the beneficiary in order to qualify be not only unmarried but 

also under 21 years of age. The State Department argument cites 

the use of the terms "unmarried son or daughter under 21 years of 

11.07" and "minor children" in several amendments, as well as the 

legislative history, and contends a literal reading of the statutory 

language requires that the unmarried adult sons or daughters of 

aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence cannot qualify for 

the benefits of section 4 or section 6 of the Act of September 22, 

1959, regardless of whether they attained the age of 21 years before 

or after September 22, 1959. 

The language contained in the proviso to sections 4 and 6 of the 

Act of September 22, 1959 (Public Law 86-363) is not the first instance of the use of such language. Thus, the same proviso appears 

in motion 12 of the Act of September 11, 1957. 

Any alien eligible for a quota Immigrant status under the provisions of 

section 203(a) (1), (2), or (3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act on the 

basis of a petition approved by the Attorney General prior to July 1, 1957, 

shall be held to be a nonquota immigrant and, if otherwise admissible under 

the provisions of that Act, shall be issued a nonquota immigrant visa: Provided, That, upon his application for an Immigrant visa, and for admission to 

94 
tne United States, the alien is found to have retained his relationship to the 

petitioner, and status, as established in the approved petition. 

The legislative report on the Act of September 11, 1957 2states 

that the purpose of the bill was to grant nonquota immigrant status 

in a limited number of cases to certain skilled specialists, alien 

parents of United States citizens and the spouses and children of 

aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence on behalf of whom 

a petition for the preference status under the Immigration and 

Nationality Act was approved by the Attorney General prior to 

July 1, 1957. It appears clear from this language that the class 

eligible for advancing from oversubscribed first, second and third 

preferences into nonquota status under section 12 of the Act of 

September 11, 1957 was required to qualify for the first, second and 

third preferences as of the cutoff approval date of July 1, 1957. 

Similarly, section 4 of the Act of September 22, 1959 requires the 

alien to have been registered on a consular waiting list under a 

priority date earlier than December 31, 1953, and that he be eligible 

for a quota immigrant status under the pruvisfoith of section 203 

(a) (2), (3) or (4) of such Act on the basis of a petition approved 

by the Attorney General prior to January 1, 1959, in order for the 

alien, his spouse and children to qualify as nonquota immigrants. 

In connection with this section, the House legislative report to 

accompany H.R. 5896 3which later became the Act of September 22, 

1959, stated that a considerable number of prospective immigrants 

remained registered under registration dates earlier than December 24, 1952, although preference status was made available to them 

under the 1952 Act; and that it was considered equitable and in 

accordance with the general family uniting principle , of the immigration laws to enable the beneficiaries of the preference petitions 

filed by their relatives (within the statutory limits of consanguinity) 

to be reclassified into nonquota status if their names appeared on 

consular waiting lists under a date earlier than December 24, 1952; 

and that this result was achieved by section 4 of H.R. 5896. The 

amendment to this section included into the nonquota category the 

accompanying spouses and minor children of the beneficiaries of 

the approved preference petitions. The House Report also comments that section 6 of the bill was designed to complete the operation of the Refugee Relief Ant. of 1952, as amended, by permitting 

the entry in a nonquota status by the members of immediate families (second and third preference quotas) of those beneficiaries of 

the 1953 law who chose to come to the United States without their 

close relatives and now desire to have their families reunited. 

A careful consideration of the arguments advfinced by the oppos2 Senate Report . No. 1057 (85th Cong., lst Seas.), p. 3. 

House Report No. 582 (86th Cong., 1st sess.), pp. 3-4. 

95 
ing parties indicates that the difficulty arises because of an apparent 

confusion occasioned by the language of section 2 of the Act of September 22, 1959 changing third preference status under section 203 

(a) (3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act from "children" 

to "unmarried sons and daughters"; and those portions of sections 4 

and 6 of the Act of September 22, 1959 moving into nonquota status 

relative-designated preference visa petitions approved prior to January 1, 1959; and section 4 which also covered into the nonquota 

classification the spouse and minor children of the beneficiary of the 

previously approved second and third preference visa petition. Section 203(a) (3) as amended by section 2 of the Act of September 22, 

1959 has no connection with sections 4 and 6 of the amendatory act. 

The beneficiaries referred to in sections 4 and 6 are the beneficiaries 

of old visa petitions approved prior to January 1, 1959, who retain 

that relationship and status. The spouse and children of such beneficiaries referred to in section 4 of the Act of September 22, 1959 

are the spouse and children acquired by the beneficiary after approval of the visa petition, such approval having been prior to 

January 1, 1959. 

A study of the language of section 12 of the Act of September 11, 

1957 and of sections 4 and 6 of the Act of September 22, 1959, as 

well as the legislative history as set forth above, leads to the conclusion that the proviso regarding retention of relationship to the 

petitioner and status refers not to the beneficiary's present marital 

status or his age, but refers to the consanguinity which gave the 

alien beneficiary second. third or fourth preference status as the 

result of the approval of his visa petition prior to January 1, 1959. 4 

 Since section 4 of the Act of September 22, 1959 permits the beneficiary of the petition approved prior to January 1, 1959, and who 

has been on a waiting list since December 31, 1953, to bring in his 

accompanying wife and children, it is apparent that the marital 

status of the beneficiary or his minority is not involved in the words 

in the proviso regarding wetention of relationship and status. All 

that is required is that the beneficiary retain the relationship which 

gave the beneficiary the preference status, such as a child, including 

a stepchild or adopted child, or a parent, including a stepparent or 

adoptive parent, to the petitioner at the time the visa petition was 

approved prior to January 1, 1959.. As long as the beneficiary remains in the eligible class in which he qualified for the second or 

third preference prior to January 1, 1959, he complies with the pro4 Prior to January 1, 1959, preference status under section 203(a) (2) was 

available to parents of citizens of the United States, such citizens being at 

least 21 years of age; preference under section 203(a) (3) was available for 

immigrants who were the spouses or the children of aliens lawfully admitted 

for permanent residence, and preference under section 203(a) (4) was granted 

to brothers, sisters, sons or daughters of citizens. 

96 
VISO regarding relationship and status_ Tf, for exa mple, an adoption 

has been terminated or the marriage creating a stepchild relationship has been dissolved, such a person would no longer have the 

relationship which qualified him initially for the second or third 

preference status. 

In the instant case it has been established that the beneficiary 

was the subject of an approved third preference quota classification 

under section ‘203(a) (3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

prior to January 1, 1959, and there has been no interruption in his 

relationship or status. It has also been established that the petitioner was admitted to the United States for permanent residence 

under the Refugee Relief Act of 1953, as amended, thereby qualifying the beneficiary under the provisions of section 6 of the Act of 

September 22, 1959. The beneficiary, therefore, may be approved 

for nonquota status either under section 4 or section 6 of the Act of 

September 22, 1959. The visa petition has been revalidated ab 

initio. We will approve the visa petition for nonquota status. 

ORDER: Tt, is ordered that the visa petition he -approved for nonquota status under sections 4 and 6 of the Act of September 22, 1959. 

97 

654377-- 63 —s