alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 


See Transfer Restrictions on Reverse Side


 


	No. SPECIMEN	SPECIMEN Shares


 


ALFI, INC.


 


Incorporated Under the Laws of the State
of Delaware


 


Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value Per Share,
Cusip No. 00161P 109


 


THIS CERTIFIES THAT
**Specimen** is the owner of **SPECIMEN (SPECIMEN)** fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock,
$0.0001 Par Value Per Share, of Alfi, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder in person or by duly
authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are
issued and shall be subject to all of the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and amendments thereto filed or to be
filed or recorded in the office of the Secretary of the State of Delaware and to the provisions of the By-Laws of the Corporation
as now or hereafter amended.


 


WITNESS the signatures of the duly authorized
officers of Alfi, Inc.


 


Dated: _____________


 


	 	 	 
	President	 	Secretary


 


A-1


 


THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS. THEY MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE, PLEDGED
OR HYPOTHECATED IN THE ABSENCE OF A REGISTRATION STATEMENT IN EFFECT WITH RESPECT TO THE SECURITIES UNDER SUCH ACT OR AN OPINION
OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED OR UNLESS SOLD PURSUANT TO RULE 144 OF SUCH ACT.


 


For value received,__________________________hereby sells,
assigns and transfers unto __________________


 


(PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER(S) OF ASSIGNEE(S))


 


	
	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

                                                                                

	
	
	


 


Shares represented
by the within Certificate, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said shares on the books
of the within named Company with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


	Dated	 	 	 





	 	 	 	Shareholder
	 	 	 	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
	Signature(s) Guaranteed: 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 



 






     


     


    

 


	 		 





THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED
BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15 OR ANY SUCCESSOR RULE).
#### HILL *v.*WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 15,

September Term, 1961.]

*Decided December*7, *1961.*

Before Hammond, Prbscott, Hornby, Marbury and SybBRT, JJ.

*656Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Day, filed in the lower court, the application for leave to appeal from the order denying him post conviction relief is hereby denied.

*Application denied.*
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, Jeffrey J. Siemers, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Material Sciences Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

c.) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d.) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: November 24, 2004
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph Garfield BROWN et al.

No. 53339.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 16, 1973.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

Application denied. There is no showing that the trial judge abused his discretion.
#### In re ESTATE of Mildred BEDFORD, a/k/a Polly Bedford, Deceased.

No. 73-266.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 22, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
June 26, 2002





Exhibit 10.6





First
Reserve Fund VI, Limited Partnership (Fund VI)


First Reserve Fund VII, Limited Partnership (Fund VII)


First Reserve Fund VIII, L.P. (Fund VIII)


c/o First Reserve Corporation


1801 California Street, Suite 4110


Denver, CO 80202





| | Re: |  | Amendment to Agreement to Elect Directors dated as of April 17, 1996 (the Agreement)
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dear Tom:





This letter will amend the above-referenced Agreement to include Fund VII and Fund VIII as First Reserve Investors as defined in the Agreement. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full
force and effect except that Section 2.7 shall be amended and restated as set forth below:





Section 2.7. Term. This Agreement shall terminate and no longer be binding on the parties hereto at such time as the First Reserve Investors beneficially own (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) less than 10% of the Common Stock.





To acknowledge your agreement to this amendment, please sign below on
behalf of Fund VI, Fund VII and Fund VIII.





SincerelyTRANSMONTAIGNE INC./s/    HAROLD R. LOGAN,
JR.Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer




---




First Reserve Fund VI, Limited Partnership (Fund VI)


First Reserve Fund VII, Limited Partnership (Fund VII)


First Reserve Fund VIII, L.P. (Fund VIII)


June 26, 2002


Page 2





Acknowledged this 26th day of June, 2002





FIRST RESERVE FUND VI, LIMITED
PARTNERSHIPBy:

First Reserve Corporation, its General PartnerBy:

/s/  THOMAS R. DENISON Managing DirectorFIRST RESERVE FUND VII, LIMITED
PARTNERSHIPBy:

First Reserve GP VII, L.P., its General PartnerBy:

First Reserve Corporation, its General PartnerBy:

THOMAS R. DENISON Managing DirectorFIRST RESERVE FUND VIII, L.P.By:

First Reserve GP VIII, L.P., its General PartnerBy:

First Reserve Corporation, its General PartnerBy:

THOMAS R. DENISON Managing Director
**Exhibit
        23.1**
 
 
  **Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
 
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
        333-108735, No. 333-102946 and No. 333-138264 of Merchants and Manufacturers
        Bancorporation, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2007, relating to our
        audits
        of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial
        reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merchants
        and
        Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. as of December 31, 2006.
 
 s/
        McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
 
 Madison,
        Wisconsin
 March
        15,
        2007
, C.J. 

Gibbons 

J. 

estate, or a personal representative throughout the course of his 

suspension and thereafter; and (4) pay the costs of the investigation, 

preparation of hearing materials, and disciplinary hearings within six 

months. The hearing panel accepted the amended conditional guilty plea 

agreement and recommended the agreed-upon discipline. 

Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the guilty 

plea agreement should be approved. See SCR 113(1). We hereby impose a 

four-year suspension retroactive to the date that Fry was temporarily 

suspended under SCR 111 (March 27, 2014). Additionally, Fry must 

comply with all of the conditions in the plea agreement, as outlined above. 

The parties shall comply with the applicable provisions of SCR 115 and 

SCR 121.1. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Hardesty 

Parraguir-f0- 

Pidem. t 

Pickering 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A ,0ter, 
SAITTA, J., dissenting: 

I dissent because the agreed-upon discipline is insufficient in 

relation to Fry's admitted conduct. I therefore would reject the conditional 

guilty plea agreement. 

Saitta 

J. 

cc: Chair, Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board 

Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg 

Stan Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A ern
#### Marvin F. THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, etc., and Delores Haynes, Respondents.

No. 42970.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1973.

Certiorari denied. *267*So.2d 18.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Succession of Mrs. Augusta Leland, wife of George Evans BURGESS.

No. 62420.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: George E. Burgess, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 323 So.2d 914.

Writ denied.
#### Charles Everett KING, alias, v. STATE.

3 Div. 665.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 7, 1978.

After remandment by the Supreme Court of Alabama, AFFIRMED on mandate of the Supreme Court, 356 So.2d 1220. No opinion. All the Judges concur.
#### Carlton Lee GAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-1064.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 2, 1974.

Ray Graham, Sarasota, for petitioner,

John J. Blair, State’s Atty., Sarasota, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari denied. In view of the disposition of this case motions for oral argument and stay are denied as moot.

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1147 

To clarify the disposition of covered persons detained in the United States 

pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2013 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To clarify the disposition of covered persons detained in 

the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use 

of Military Force, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Due Process and Mili5 tary Detention Amendments Act of 2013’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1147 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISPOSITION OF COVERED PERSONS DETAINED IN 

2 THE UNITED STATES PURSUANT TO THE AU3 THORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE. 

4 Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization 

5 Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 

6 1562; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘The disposi8 tion’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in sub9 section (g), the disposition’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 sections: 

12 ‘‘(g) DISPOSITION OF COVERED PERSONS DETAINED

13 IN THE UNITED STATES.— 

14 ‘‘(1) PERSONS DETAINED PURSUANT TO THIS

15 ACT OR THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY

16 FORCE.—In the case of a covered person who is de17 tained in the United States pursuant to this Act or 

18 the Authorization for Use of Military Force, disposi19 tion under the law of war shall occur immediately 

20 upon the person coming into custody of the United 

21 States Government and shall only mean the imme22 diate transfer of the person for trial and proceedings 

23 with all the due process rights as provided for under 

24 the Constitution of the United States. 

25 ‘‘(2) PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER TO MILITARY

26 CUSTODY.—No person detained, captured, or armstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 1147 IS

1 rested in the United States, or a territory or posses2 sion of the United States, may be transferred to the 

3 custody of the Armed Forces for detention under 

4 this Act or the Authorization for Use of Military 

5 Force. 

6 ‘‘(h) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—This section shall 

7 not be construed to authorize the detention of a person 

8 within the United States, or a territory or possession of 

9 the United States, under this Act or the Authorization for 

10 Use of Military Force.’’. 

11 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR MILITARY CUS12 TODY. 

13 (a) REPEAL.—Section 1022 of the National Defense 

14 Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 

15 81; 125 Stat. 1563; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is hereby re16 pealed. 

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1029(b) of 

18 such Act (125 Stat. 1570) is amended by striking ‘‘applies 

19 to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘any other person’’ and 

20 inserting ‘‘applies to any person’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21

SCHEDULE OF TRANSMONTAIGNE INC. SUBSIDIARIES AT JUNE 30, 2000


Ownership                                                          State/Country
of                                                    Trade        of
Subsidiary   Name of Subsidiary                       Name         Organization
----------   ------------------------------------     -----------  -------------

  100%       K123 Corporation                         None         Colorado

  100%       Republic Natural Gas Company             None         Kansas

  100%       TransMontaigne Canada Ltd.               None         Canada

   65%       TransMontaigne Holding Inc.              None         Arkansas

  100%       TransMontaigne Pipeline Inc.             None         Arkansas

  100%       TransMontaigne Product Services Inc.     None         Delaware

  100%       TransMontaigne Terminaling Inc.          Razorback    Arkansas
                                                      Terminaling
                                                      Co.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<MULTIPLIER>           1000

       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          388
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                122
<PP&E>                                       11,598
<DEPRECIATION>                                2,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                9,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           223
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    1,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  9,864
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,517
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (136)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0

        

</TABLE>
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

December 12, 2008

Mr. Louis A. Olivarez

1098 S. Hwy 2037

Fort Stockton, TX 79735

Ms. Carolee Donna Dennis Cox

Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 1902

Aransas Pass, TX 78335

RE:Case Number:  08-0738

Court of Appeals Number:  13-07-00348-CV

Trial Court Number:  S-06-5501FL-C

Style:LOUIS A. OLIVAREZ

v.

RAELA JOHNSON OLIVAREZ

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court withdrew the order of December 5, 2008, dismissing the petition for review for want of jurisdiction, and reinstated the petition for review in the above-referenced case.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 08-0738Page 1**
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. A. J. MYERS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53949.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 1973.

In re: A. J. Myers applying for writ of certiorari and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The ruling of the trial judge was correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,195,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,210,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   614,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,030,000
<PP&E>                                      11,475,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,017,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             155,633,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,331,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,000
<PREFERRED>                                      6,000
<COMMON>                                        49,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,396,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               155,633,000
<SALES>                                     15,139,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,614,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,736,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,495,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (878,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (878,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (958,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,590,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.94)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 12

                     GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                          AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                         Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
<TABLE>
<S><C>
                                   (Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)

Earnings:
   Earnings before income taxes                                                    $ 362
   Fixed charges:
     Minority interest in net earnings of                                             44
         consolidated subsidiaries (1)
     Interest expense (2)                                                             66
                                                                           -----------------
                                                                                   $ 472
                                                                           =================

Fixed charges:
     Minority interest in net earnings of                                          $  63
         consolidated subsidiaries (3)
   Interest expense (2)                                                               66
                                                                           -----------------
                                                                                   $ 129
                                                                           =================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                  3.66
                                                                           =================

</TABLE>


(1) Minority  interest in net  earnings of  consolidated  subsidiaries  includes
earnings  from  purchased  affiliates  and dividends on  subsidiary's  preferred
stock.

(2) Interest  expense  includes an amount for  one-third of the rental  expense,
which we believe is a reasonable  approximation  of the interest factor for such
rentals.

(3)  The  fixed  charges  amount  for  minority  interest  in  net  earnings  of
consolidated  subsidiaries represents the pre-tax earnings amount which would be
required to cover such fixed charges as calculated below:

                      Earnings From Purchased Affiliates or
                Subsidiary's Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
                -------------------------------------------------
                             100% - Income Tax Rate

The income tax rate is based on the  relationship  of the  provision  for income
taxes to earnings before income taxes for the respective period.



<PAGE>
251 La. 733

#### George CLERK v. The CONNECTICUT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 49017.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 2, 1968.

In re: George Clerk applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second- Circuit, Parish of Ouachita. 203 So.2d 866.

Writ refused. The judgment complained of is correct.