alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-109345, No. 333-109346, No. 33-14531, No. 33-54483, No.
33-64998, No. 33-65440, No. 33-68336, No. 333-04775, No. 333-04823, No.
333-62087, No. 333-62103, No. 333-95409, No. 333-41328, No. 333-71502 and No.
333-97713) pertaining to employee equity compensation plans of Novell, Inc. of
our report dated November 16, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Novell, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2004.


                                    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
January 10, 2005
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1277

To equalize the minimum adjustments to prices for fluid milk under milk

marketing orders, to require the Secretary of Agriculture to study the

solids content of beverage milk, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 22 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. DURENBERGER (for himself, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. KOHL, Mr. DASCHLE,

Mr. PRESSLER, Mr. DORGAN, and Mr. WELLSTONE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To equalize the minimum adjustments to prices for fluid

milk under milk marketing orders, to require the Secretary of Agriculture to study the solids content of beverage milk, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act shall be known as the ‘‘Dairy Equity Act’’.
2

•S 1277 IS

1 SEC. 2. EQUALIZATION OF MINIMUM PRICE ADJUSTMENT

2 FOR CLASS I MILK FOR ALL MARKETING

3 AREAS.

4 (a) USE OF SAME PRICE.—Section 8c(5) of the Agri5 cultural Adjustment Act, reenacted with amendments by

6 the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (7

7 U.S.C. 608c(5)), is amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (A)—

9 (A) in the third sentence—

10 (i) by striking ‘‘Throughout’’ and all

11 that follows through ‘‘order involved), the’’

12 and inserting ‘‘The’’; and

13 (ii) by striking ‘‘on the date’’ and all

14 that follows through the end of the table in

15 that sentence and inserting ‘‘shall be the

16 same for each marketing area subject to

17 an order and shall be $1.80 per hundred18 weight of milk having 3.5 percent milkfat,

19 with a transportation surcharge deter20 mined by the Secretary to compensate han21 dlers for the actual cost of moving milk

22 within and between orders.’’; and

23 (B) by striking the fourth sentence;

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

25 this section shall take effect on the first day of the first
3

•S 1277 IS

1 month beginning more than 120 days after the date of

2 enactment of this Act.

3 SEC. 3. STUDY OF SOLIDS CONTENT OF BEVERAGE MILK.

4 (a) FINDING.—Congress finds that current standards

5 for milk solids not fat contained in class I milk for fluid

6 use produced in geographic areas covered by milk market7 ing orders issued pursuant to section 8c of the Agricul8 tural Adjustment Act, reenacted with amendments by the

9 Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (7 U.S.C.

10 608c), are below the average levels of milk solids not fat

11 contained in unprocessed fluid milk that is produced on

12 farms of producers.

13 (b) STUDY.—Not later than 1 year after the date of

14 enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall—

15 (1) study the desirability and effects of fortify16 ing class I fluid milk described in subsection (a)

17 with additional nonfat solids, including consumer ac18 ceptance of fortifying the milk; and

19 (2) report the results of the study to the Com20 mittee on Agriculture of the House of Representa21 tives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,

22 and Forestry of the Senate.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             893
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,828
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,186
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,327
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,397
<LOANS>                                        104,260
<ALLOWANCE>                                        854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,544
<DEPOSITS>                                      84,892
<SHORT-TERM>                                    19,550
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,311
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,145
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 126,544
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,187
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  251
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    16
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,454
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 993
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,259
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,195
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       24
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    637
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         637
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.05
<LOANS-NON>                                        803
<LOANS-PAST>                                       321
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   796
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                        34
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  854
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               854
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.14




FORFEITURE AGREEMENT


 


This Forfeiture Agreement (this “Agreement”)
is entered into as of March 25, 2021, by and between FG SPAC Partners LP (the “Transferor”) and Aldel Financial Inc. (the
 “Transferee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Transferor desires to transfer 575,000
shares (the “Shares”) of common stock, $0.0001 par value, of the Transferee back to the Transferee for cancellation at no
cost.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree
as follows:


 


	1. 	Transfer of the Shares.



 


The Transferor hereby transfers to the Transferee
the Shares, and the Transferee hereby cancels the Shares.


 


	2. 	Representations and Warranties of the Transferor.



 


The Transferor represents and warrants that it
has full legal capacity and authority to enter into the Agreement and to transfer the Shares to the Transferee hereunder, and is not bound
by any agreement, instrument or governmental order prohibiting such transfer. The Transferor also represents that it is transferring such
interests free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those created by the terms of the Transferee’s organizational
documents or imposed by applicable federal and state securities laws.


 


	3. 	Binding Effect.



 


This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns.


 


	4. 	Entire Agreement.



 


This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
of the parties hereto.


 


	5. 	Governing Law.



 


This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of
the State of New York without regard to its conflict of laws principles.


 


	6. 	Modification.



 


This Agreement may not be amended or supplemented
at any time unless by a writing executed by the parties hereto.


 






    	 



     


    

 


	7. 	Headings.



 


The headings in this Agreement are solely for convenience
or reference and shall not affect its interpretation.


 


	8. 	Counterparts; Facsimile.



 


This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and
the same instrument. This Agreement or any counterpart may be executed via facsimile or other electronic transmission, and any such executed
facsimile or electronic copy shall be treated as an original.


 


 


[The balance of this page is intentionally left
page.]








    	 	2	 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed
this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.


 


Transferor:


 


	 	FG SPAC Partners LP
	 	 	 
	 	            	 
	 	By: 	/s/Larry G. Swets
	 	Name: 	Larry G. Swets, Jr. 
	 	Title: 	CEO of Manager


 


Transferee:


 


	 	Aldel Financial Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/Robert I. Kauffman
	 	Name: 	Robert I. Kauffman
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer


 






    	 	3
#### Henry Carl SKINNER et al. v. W. Clayton SIMONTON et al.

No. 54088.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 21, 1973.

In re: John S. Simonton, et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Lincoln, 284 So.2d 614.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### EVERSHIELD PRODUCTS, INC. v. SAPP.

No. 36231.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 20, 1967.

Appeal dismissed without opinion. 195 So.2d 10.
#### Mr. & Mrs. James H. LEWIS et al. v. CITY OF PASCAGOULA.

No. 46798.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 9, 1972.

Megehee & Brown, John G. Corlew, Pascagoula, for appellants.

Colingo & Blackwell, Pascagoula, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Darwin M. Maples, Judge.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and JONES, PATTERSON, INZER and ROBERTSON, JJ.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         679,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,184,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (165,173)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,474,835
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,774,618
<PP&E>                                       2,097,843
<DEPRECIATION>                               (788,492)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,502,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,900,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,167,432
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,520)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,502,006
<SALES>                                     20,289,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,289,818
<CGS>                                       12,513,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,513,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,261,022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                51,630
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (230,606)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,441,842
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (435,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,006,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,006,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 11:14 AM

To: 'jmagers76@yahoo.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Petition for Exemption: X12 Production Services, LLP

May 20, 2015 

Dear Mr. Magers: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1038). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 3, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000948218
<NAME> MINN DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                             257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     77,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,974
<PP&E>                                         167,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,647
<BONDS>                                         11,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,483
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,945
<SALES>                                         96,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,996
<CGS>                                           38,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,867
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,826
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,826
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
252 La. 170

#### Vera TOOLEY, divorced wife of Ronald J. PENNISON v. Ronald J. PENNISON.

No. 49261.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1968.

In re: James J. Morrison and Robert M. Pennison applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 208 So.2d 403.

Writs denied. There appears no error of law in the ruling complained of.

McCALEB, J., recused.
TOCLOL eae ae ae as ae ae ea aa a aa eal aa
TTA ae ee

aS SHHRECCY PDCENCERDIECHECRNEACENCY CONT ERAEECE

Ee ea (OMY Ligases Hate

Hes Se ae ae

lal Tot etre ATT a. Sr reeer eeur act

. *~ ;
,
.
‘
‘
o
‘ft
| . ‘
.
| 5
.
] :
’
ry . - -~-. - .
‘
,
‘

’ *
sara es | 3

(9 et i~|SVO SE CY

|
'
i

y i fie HM
iT¥OA4 0
Boesed o1q) oom

en 19(-298 "000 WER ‘a .
xiQS AONE ie

~~,
-~27.
las

a

~)

on, fg tharann, or heveatightcan

6.D.No. 44. BE. D.Na 3

Fetnetated ky ene en

= Ill

=
FOR OFFICE USE OXNLY—DO HOT WRITE Iv

a9

OCCUPATION
profession.
salesman

; 1940

Trade,
lar kind of work,

i

es
ea

H

PERSONS 14 YEARS OLD AND OVER—EMPLOYMIENT STATUS

“a ooh

petvate oF

WAT WORK!

caaivaine, "Four Senses Reports Uanost be Ved he Pespaece

not the U.S. Census Bureau.

any facts, i
oom. Bes ha Ee

itetod wut Go kned nip fr preparing susientea! abeematien enaseraing ths Nation'» pepeision,

yoo

POPULATION SCHEDULE

as his uscal
this,

aad Vastoass
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS

SIXTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES:

person
Gel, 14. CITIZENERIF OF “AR PORRION

which the
the prat Ie ears and ab which he i payscaly
claes of .

Li

person without previous work experience, enie: “ Non." in Col. 45 and leave Cols. 46 and 47

FOR PERSONS 14 YEARS OLD AND OVER
USUAL OCCUPATION, INDUSTRY, AND
blank.

USUAL OCCUPATION

sailed ih 4, uv ¢, i 3

Enter that
ae Ifthe
= soyee
f For a
5
a3;
#35
ses #4, &4, #4, a

-——-

5
nts
did

ie)

i

3
z

Riomentary echvol, lente Gh grade... 1, 0, ate., 8

Patieet Bip 2 popere need peat

Bullegy, bet te Hb peat —---

|
2
E
Ooi, i4, HIGHEST GRADS OF SOROOL COMPLETED,
None... 7

wis
we
wie

(Neme of institution and lines on which eniries are made)
iis
tote
wie
a
September 1000... ..... Mesch wenneemiane
Gi bo ands sedenn bore on ovo bliin) ”

F

2eDasee se

Institution ..............
Reromber 108... .cccccs 18

December 1008... nusscecs

October 1008... nnesececee WIP
January 1040 |

Ler doll anf {SERERROG OE BIBINER

—— CR RRR EDO SSRBEEEBNGNEE
ams Saas deed A wba dA Lad AA Ad AA a

So BRECELCEECECOEEEECEECPCUELCE
=

MeL EEE PEE FEI EE FE EEEEFEFEEEE

EDUCATION
(OR NATIVE
at;
ot after April |, 1698, ae Gillows, Bera in:

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

ore @eee

ed

.
dese we CP Seer eag see
ages 1690.

q
~
—
)
*

MOTEER TONGUE

—

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration,

Block Nos.
PERSONAL
DESCRIPTION

1
%
i
=
:
5
3
S

OR PERSONS OF ALL AGES

i
i %
:

daughter,

Cat 16, COLOR OB BACH,
o

erxtAl
.  Fownship os other

o|*

smae © wo ouNt pIOg - may oom

permes fp yerres
Ayqvee # ‘ponme p ‘omeq po onto, |“

“ ———- -

(W) pertes 52 (9) preae omeg |

Ga. & FALSE OF BONS, IX OWNED:

po mepee eT preqerneg po reqareg |”

a

SUPPLEMENTARY
QUESTIONS

ap "yas wares way | 0

4 s 5] 8/8 ¢
i]; Cj

evsaols
aay
eePLasaToar
#### Clarence Edward HARRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-725.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 19, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Leonard KELLER and Leonard Keller, Inc., Appellants, v. The MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Appellee.

No. 76-1948.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Shorenstein & Lewis, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Malspeis, Lococo & Brown, North Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HUB-BART and KEHOE, JJ.

*1261KEHOE, Judge.

Appellants, defendants and counterclaim-ants below, bring this appeal from a final judgment dated August 27, 1976, entered by the trial court imposing liability on them, both jointly and severally, for certain brokerage commissions and denying their counterclaims as an offset. We have carefully reviewed the record, heard arguments of the parties’ respective counsel and studied their briefs, and have concluded that no reversible error has been shown. See, e. g., *Strate v. Strate,*328 So.2d 29 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); *Biscayne Manufacturing Corp. v. Sandav Corp.,*323 So.2d 315 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); *Fernandez v. Arocha,*308 So.2d 45 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); and *Global Aero Service, Inc. v. Lloyd Aereo Boliviano, S.A.,*157 So.2d 708 (Fla.3d DCA 1963). Therefore, the final judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### Ivey DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 16, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Washington v. State, 86 Fla. 519, 98 So. 603; Martin v. State, 86 Fla. 616, 98 So. 827.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of First Investors Financial Services, Inc., (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BennieH. Duck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Act of 1934; and

(2)     The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  September 13, 2004

 
|   | By: /s/ Bennie H. Duck  |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Bennie H. Duck          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of First Investors Financial Services, Inc., (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BennieH. Duck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and                           |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
| Date: March 14,  2006 |                     |
|-----------------------|--------------------------|
|                  |                     |
|                  | By:                      | /s/ Bennie H.  Duck |   |
|                  | Bennie H. Duck           |
|                  | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----