alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dennis Charles HARWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-804.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 23, 1974.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

MANN, Chief Judge.

We have before us an appeal from a judgment entered on a guilty plea to two counts, one charging possession of marijuana in a quantity constituting a felony and the other charging possession of narcotics paraphernalia. Harwood negotiated a plea of guilty to both charges with the understanding that he would not be sentenced to more than five years. We affirm on the record before us because there is no showing that the plea was not intelligently and voluntarily entered. There is however a matter of concern which Har-wood is at liberty to raise by petition filed under CrPR. 3.850, 33 F.S.A., if his plea was based on erroneous information. The trial judge stated, during a patiently conducted colloquy, that “there could be a maximum of ten years on this charge.” If these charges were independent and cumulatively punishable, this would be a correct statement of the possible maximum sentence to which Harwood was subjected. On the other hand, it is possible that these charges are such intertwined aspects of the same transaction that they are punishable by only one sentence for the graver of*570fense. It is possible, therefore, that the maximum penalty Harwood faced was five years rather than ten and that consequently a bargained plea for five years may have been entered without an understanding of this aspect of the law. We have most recently discussed the matter in Edmond v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 280 So.2d 449. *See*also, Foster v. State, Fla.1973, 286 So.2d 549, opinion filed December 5, 1973. For the reasons stated in the concurring opinion in Jackson v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 283 So.2d 390, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a petition under CrPR. 3.850 if he alleges that his guilty plea was not a knowing and voluntary one.

Affirmed.

McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 89 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 89

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to limit the size of 
 committees to 25 members and to prohibit Members from serving on more 
                      than one standing committee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 1993

Ms. Snowe submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to limit the size of 
 committees to 25 members and to prohibit Members from serving on more 
                      than one standing committee.

    Resolved, That clause 6(a) of rule X of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) No committee shall have more than 25 members.
    ``(4) No Member (including the Resident Commissioner from Puerto 
Rico and each Delegate to the House) may serve on more than one 
standing committee. Service on the Committee on Standards of Official 
Conduct shall not count for purposes of the preceding sentence.''.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm

The Board of DirectorsPoniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-140584, 333-134480, 333-123672,333-115497, 333-113706, 333-111344, 333-45398 and 333-35442on Forms S-3 and in the registration statements Nos. 333-135861,333-126209, 333-115729, 333-89476, 333-71368, 333-41764,333-32583, 33-43860, 33-46317 and 33-87108 on Forms S-8)of Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2007,with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of PoniardPharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, andshareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006annual report on Form 10-K of Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Our reports refer to theadoption by Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiary of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), *Share-Based Payment*, effective January 1, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, WashingtonMarch 15, 2007

----
#### Billy G. LAMBERT, Petitioner, v. RANDLE-EASTERN AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 40447.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 17, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J„ and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, of The First Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Johnson, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David E. JohnsonName:

David E. JohnsonTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

August 11, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The First Bancshares, Inc., and will be retained by The First
Bancshares, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jim FAIR, Appellant, v. H. L. WIGGINS, Appellee.

No. 69-588.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 6, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 34825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-48-2018]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 176--Rockford, Illinois; Notification of 
Proposed Production Activity; Leading Americas Inc. (Wire Harnesses); 
Hampshire, Illinois

    Leading Americas Inc. (Leading Americas) submitted a notification 
of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility in 
Hampshire, Illinois. The notification conforming to the requirements of 
the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on July 
16, 2018.
    The Leading Americas facility is located within Site 17 of FTZ 176. 
The facility is will be used for the production of wire harnesses for 
the forklift and heavy-duty construction equipment industries. Pursuant 
to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited to the specific 
foreign-status materials and components and specific finished products 
described in the submitted notification (as described below) and 
subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board.
    Production under FTZ procedures could exempt Leading Americas from 
customs duty payments on the foreign-status components used in export 
production. On its domestic sales, for the foreign-status materials/
components noted below, Leading Americas would be able to choose the 
duty rates during customs entry procedures that apply to wire harnesses 
(duty rate 3.5%). Leading America would be able to avoid duty on 
foreign-status components which become scrap/waste. Customs duties also 
could possibly be deferred or reduced on foreign-status production 
equipment.
    The components and materials sourced from abroad include electrical 
tape, electrical terminals, copper winding wire, electrical connectors, 
and flexible polyvinyl chloride tubes (duty rate ranges from duty-free 
to 5.8%).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the address 
below. The closing period for their receipt is September 4, 2018.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
Board's website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Juanita Chen at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f9938c9897908d98d79a919c97b98d8b989d9cd79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbb1aebab5b2afbaf5b8b3beb59bafa9babfbef5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-482-1378.

    Dated: July 17, 2018.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15690 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 34565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15484]



[[Page 34565]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-2013-000]


Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is August 2, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#43050611000c2d2f2a2d26103633332c313703252631206d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="286e6d7a6b67464441464d7b5d5858475a5c684e4d5a4b064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 13, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15484 Filed 7-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
258 La. 703

#### Herbert BAKER and Mrs. Gertrude Baker Paynter v. CHEVRON OIL COMPANY et al.

No. 51381.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1971.

In re: Herbert Baker and Mrs. Gertrude Baker Paynter applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Lincoln. 245 So.2d 457.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EX-10.11





 Exhibit 10.11 

 
 



 
 PROJECT PATRIOT BONUS AGREEMENT 

August 28, 2020 
 Dear Tom 

SkyWater Technology Foundry, Inc. is pleased to present you with this Project Patriot Bonus Agreement, which has the potential bonus earnings value of
$300,000 (subject to applicable tax withholdings), subject to all the terms and conditions detailed below. 
 The actual bonus earned shall depend on
completion of Project Patriot and your level of effort and performance in the 7 project phases as well as the successful refinancing/recapitalization of the Company. 

In addition to the overall Project Patriot success and completion of the project, you must remain an employee in good standing and on active payroll through
the payout date in order to receive a payout. The “payout date” shall be the date on which the President and Chief Financial Officer review and determine the performance results associated with the overall project success. Such
determination shall be documented on a Project Summary Evaluation. If you terminate employment (either voluntarily or “for cause”) with the Company prior to the payout date, you forfeit any bonus that would have been achieved. 

This letter is not intended to be constructed as an employment contract, it does not guarantee the length of your employment with the Company, nor does it
alter the at-will nature of your employment with SkyWater Technology Foundry, Inc. You agree to keep the existence, amount and terms of this Project Bonus Agreement set forth herein completely confidential.
You shall not publish or disclose to any third party any confidential or proprietary information concerning the Company that was acquired or learned during your employment with the Company. 

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota without reference to conflicts of law rules. 

 

									
	/s/ Tom Sonderman	 	8/28/2020	 		 	  
	 	  

	Tom Sonderman	 	Date	 		 		 	
					
	/s/ Steve Manko	 	8/28/2020	 		 	/s/ Tom Sonderman	 	8/28/2020
	Steve Manko, CFO	 	Date	 		 	Tom Sonderman, President	 	Date

  

					
	Page 1 of 1
#### Fred Lee MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2665.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 9, 1970.

Robert G. Ferrell, III, Public Defender, and Ned N. Julian, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Sanford, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James M. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

*720WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting):

I would reverse because of the failure of the State to prove that the defendant stole a 19S7 Lincoln automobile, Serial No. 57WA147302, Florida Tag 17 M 115, from its owner C. E. Williams, d/b/a C & J Motors, as charged. The defendant is entitled to a reversal and a new trial upon the principles announced in Morgan v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 186 So.2d 795 and Carson v. State, Fla.App.1967, 205 So.2d 340.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1214 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1214

To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the United States 
             of America for use by the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2013

 Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the United States 
             of America for use by the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``All-American Flag Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PURCHASE OF DOMESTICALLY MADE UNITED STATES 
              FLAGS FOR USE BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided under subsection (b), only such 
flags of the United States of America, regardless of size, that are 100 
percent manufactured in the United States, from articles, materials, or 
supplies 100 percent of which are grown, produced, or manufactured in 
the United States, may be acquired for use by the Federal Government.
    (b) Waiver.--The head of an executive agency may waive the 
requirement under subsection (a) on a case-by-case basis upon a 
determination that--
            (1) the application of the limitation would cause 
        unreasonable costs or delays to be incurred; or
            (2) application of the limitation would adversely affect a 
        United States company.
    (c) Amendment of Federal Acquisition Regulation.--Not later than 
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal 
Acquisition Regulatory Council established under section 1302 of title 
41, United States Code, shall amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation 
to implement this section.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Executive agency.--The term ``executive agency'' has 
        the meaning given the term in section 133 of title 41, United 
        States Code.
            (2) Federal acquisition regulation.--The term ``Federal 
        Acquisition Regulation'' has the meaning given the term in 
        section 106 of title 41, United States Code.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 2 shall apply to purchases of flags made on or after 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 4. CONSISTENCY WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.

    This Act shall be applied in a manner consistent with United States 
obligations under international agreements.
                                 <all>
```
#### Raul P. ARREOLA, Appellant, v. NEW YORK UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-765.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 22, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### James E. McDONALD v. STATE.

No. 38498.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1969.

Appeals dismissed without opinion. 221 So.2d 36.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF FINANCIAL POSITION, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND UNASSIGNED DEFICIT, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     1,216,317,983
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                 119,831,642
<MORTGAGE>                                 433,111,009
<REAL-ESTATE>                               25,015,350
<TOTAL-INVEST>                           1,794,275,984
<CASH>                                     250,097,769
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,720,021
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          10,612,954,546
<POLICY-LOSSES>                          1,880,339,454
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       29,141,237
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 394,493,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            10,612,954,546
<PREMIUMS>                                 950,824,960
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        136,016,402
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                         (1,705,441)
<OTHER-INCOME>                             605,378,130
<BENEFITS>                               1,238,713,348
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            116,913,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                42,864,653
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                74,049,195
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>