This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices to the public of the proposed

issuance of rules and regulations. The

purpose of these notices is to give interested

persons an opportunity to participate in the

rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules.

Proposed Rules Federal Register

2805 

Vol. 79, No. 11 

Thursday, January 16, 2014 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Part 1211 

[Document No. AMS–FV–11–0074; PR–1A] 

RIN 0581–AD24 

Hardwood Lumber and Hardwood 

Plywood Promotion, Research and 

Information Order; Reopening and 

Extension of Comment Period on 

Proposed Establishment of a Program 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA. 

ACTION: Reopening and extension of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the comment period on the proposed 

rule establishing an industry-funded 

promotion, research and information 

program for hardwood lumber and 

hardwood plywood is reopened and 

extended. The comment period is also 

extended for the new hardwood lumber 

and hardwood plywood information 

collection requirements by the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for the 

operation of the proposed program. The 

proposed Hardwood Lumber and 

Hardwood Plywood Promotion, 

Research and Information Order, was 

submitted to the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture (USDA) by the Blue Ribbon 

Committee, a committee of 14 hardwood 

lumber and hardwood plywood 

industry leaders representing small and 

large manufacturers and geographically 

distributed throughout the United 

States. 

DATES: The comment period for the 

proposed rule published November 13, 

2013 (78 FR 68298), is extended. 

Comments must be received by 

February 18, 2014. Pursuant to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 

comments on the information collection 

burden that would result from this 

proposal must be received by February 

18, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov or to the 

Promotion and Economics Division, 

Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, 

USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue 

SW., Room 1406–S, Stop 0244, 

Washington, DC 20250–0244; facsimile: 

(202) 205–2800. All comments should 

reference the docket number and the 

date and page number of this issue of 

the Federal Register and will be made 

available for public inspection, 

including the name and address if 

provided, in the above office during 

regular business hours or can be viewed 

at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Pursuant to the PRA, comments 

regarding the accuracy of the burden 

estimate; ways to minimize the burden, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; or any other 

aspect of this collection of information; 

should be sent to the above address. In 

addition, comments concerning the 

information collection should also be 

sent to the Desk Office for Agriculture, 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, OMB, New Executive Office 

Building, 725 17th Street NW., Room 

725, Washington, DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia A. Petrella, Marketing 

Specialist, Promotion and Economics 

Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, 

AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 

Avenue SW., Room 1406–S, Stop 0244, 

Washington, DC 20250–0244; telephone: 

(301) 334–2891; or facsimile: (301) 334– 

2896; or email: Patricia.Petrella@

ams.usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A 

proposed rule was issued on November 

6, 2013, and published in the Federal 

Register on November 13, 2013 (78 FR 

68298). That rule proposed the 

establishment of an industry-funded 

promotion, research and information 

program for hardwood lumber and 

hardwood plywood. 

USDA received congressional 

inquiries and letters from industry 

members requesting that the comment 

period be extended to allow additional 

time for interested persons to review the 

proposal and submit comments. 

USDA is reopening and extending the 

comment period an additional 30 days 

to allow interested persons more time to 

review the proposed rule, perform a 

complete analysis, and submit written 

comments. 

Authority: This notice is issued pursuant 

to the Commodity Promotion, Research, and 

Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 

7411–7425). 

Dated: January 10, 2014. 

Rex A. Barnes, 

Associate Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2014–00733 Filed 1–13–14; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0020; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–CE–039–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; British 

Aerospace (Operations) Limited 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for British 

Aerospace (Operations) Limited Model 

HP.137 Jetstream Mk.1, Jetstream Series 

200, and Jetstream Series 3101 airplanes 

that would supersede an existing AD. 

This proposed AD results from 

mandatory continuing airworthiness 

information (MCAI) originated by an 

aviation authority of another country to 

identify and correct an unsafe condition 

on an aviation product. The MCAI 

describes the unsafe condition as 

cracking of the forward main landing 

gear yoke pintle resulting from 

corrosion pits leading to stress 

corrosion. We are issuing this proposed 

AD to require actions to address the 

unsafe condition on these products. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by March 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
2806 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 11 / Thursday, January 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact BAE Systems 

(Operations) Ltd, Customer Information 

Department, Prestwick International 

Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, 

United Kingdom; phone: +44 1292 

675207, fax: +44 1292 675704; email: 

RApublications@baesystems.com; 

Internet: http://

www.jetstreamcentral.com. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Small Airplane 

Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, 

Missouri 64106. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call (816) 329–4148. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0020; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer, 

FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 

Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, 

Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329– 

4138; fax: (816) 329–4090; email: 

taylor.martin@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0020; Directorate Identifier 

2013–CE–039–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

regulations.gov, including any personal 

information you provide. We will also 

post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On December 16, 1986, we issued AD 

87–02–04, Amendment 39–5497 (51 FR 

47211, December 31, 1986). That AD 

required actions intended to address an 

unsafe condition on the products listed 

above. 

Since we issued AD 87–02–04, 

Amendment 39–5497 (51 FR 47211, 

December 31, 1986), there has been a 

reported failure of the main landing gear 

(MLG) on a Jetstream Series 3100 

airplane. An investigation revealed 

stress corrosion cracking of the MLG 

yoke pintle housing as a root cause of 

the MLG failure. 

The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 

for the Member States of the European 

Community, has issued EASA AD No.: 

2013–0208, dated September 10, 2013 

(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to 

correct an unsafe condition for the 

specified products. The MCAI states: 

Prompted by occurrences of the main 

landing gear (MLG) yoke pintle housing 

cracking, the United Kingdom Civil Aviation 

Authority (UK CAA) issued AD G–003–01–86 

to require repetitive inspections to identify 

any crack in the yoke pintle housing on MLG 

fitted to Jetstream 3100 aeroplanes in 

accordance with BAE Systems (Operations) 

Ltd Service Bulletin (SB) 32–A–JA851226, 

and depending on findings, corrective action. 

After that AD was issued, an occurrence of 

Jetstream 3100 MLG failure was reported 

after landing. The subsequent investigation 

revealed stress corrosion cracking of the MLG 

yoke pintle housing as a root cause of the 

MLG failure. Furthermore, the investigation 

report recommended a review of the 

effectiveness of UK CAA AD G–003–01–86 in 

identifying cracks in the yoke pintle housing 

on MLG fitted to Jetstream 3100 aeroplanes. 

Degradation of the surface protection by 

abrasion can occur when the forward face of 

the yoke pintle rotates against the pintle 

bearing, which introduces corrosion pits and, 

consequently, stress corrosion cracking. 

This condition, if not detected and 

corrected, could lead to structural failure of 

the MLG, possibly resulting in loss of control 

of the aeroplane during take-off or landing 

runs. 

To provide protection of the affected area 

of the MLG assembly spigot housing, BAE 

Systems (Operations) Ltd issued SB 32– 

JM7862 to provide instructions for 

installation of a protective washer, fitted at 

the forward spigot on both, left hand (LH) 

and right hand (RH), MLG. Consequently, 

BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd issued SB 

32–A–JA851226 at Revision 5 to provide 

additional accomplishment instructions for 

Non-destructive testing inspection (NDT) of 

MLG equipped with the protective washer 

installed in accordance with BAE Systems 

(Operations) Ltd SB 32–JM7862 and to 

introduce reference to MLG manufacturer 

APPH Ltd SB 32–19 at Revision 4, providing 

instructions for re-protection of the yoke 

pintle. 

For the reasons described above, this AD 

retains the requirements of AD G–003–01–86, 

which is superseded, and requires 

implementation of revised inspection 

requirements, and depending on findings, 

corrective action. This AD introduces an 

optional modification, which constitutes 

terminating action for the inspections 

required by this AD. 

You may examine the MCAI on the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov 

by searching for and locating it in 

Docket No. FAA–2014–0020. 

Relevant Service Information 

British Aerospace (Operations) 

Limited issued Jetstream Series 3100 & 

3200 Service Bulletin No. 32–A– 

JA851226, Revision 5, dated April 30, 

2013; Jetstream Service Bulletin 32– 

JA880340, dated January 6, 1989; which 

references British Aerospace Dynamics 

Division Service Bulletin 32–36, dated 

July 20, 1988; APPH Ltd. Service 

Bulletin No. 32–19, Revision 4, dated 

April 3, 2013; and APPH Ltd. Service 

Bulletin No. 32–40, Revision 1, dated 

February 2003. The actions described in 

this service information are intended to 

correct the unsafe condition identified 

in the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of the Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with this State of 

Design Authority, they have notified us 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all 

information and determined the unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

will affect 44 products of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it would take 

about 14 work-hours per product to 

comply with the inspection 

requirements of this proposed AD. The 

average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. 

Based on these figures, we estimate 

the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. 

operators to be $52,360, or $1,190 per 

product. 

In addition, we estimate that any 

necessary follow-on actions would take 

about 10 work-hours and require parts 

costing $5,000, for a cost of $5,850 per 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 11 / Thursday, January 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules 2807 

product for repairs. We have no way of 

determining the number of products 

that may need these actions. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Amendment 39–5497 (51 FR 

47211, December 31, 1986), and adding 

the following new AD: 

British Aerospace (Operations) Limited: 

Docket No. FAA–2014–0020; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–CE–039–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by March 3, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD supersedes AD 87–02–04, 

Amendment 39–5497 (51 FR 47211, 

December 31, 1986). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to British Aerospace 

(Operations) Limited Model HP.137 Jetstream 

Mk.1, Jetstream Series 200, and Jetstream 

Series 3101 airplanes, all serial numbers, 

certificated in any category. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association of America 

(ATA) Code 32: Landing Gear. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by mandatory 

continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of another 

country to identify and correct an unsafe 

condition on an aviation product. The MCAI 

describes the unsafe condition as cracking of 

the forward main landing gear (MLG) yoke 

pintle that resulted from corrosion pits 

leading to stress corrosion. We are issuing 

this AD to prevent failure of the MLG, which 

could result in loss of control of the airplane 

during take-off or landing. 

(f) Actions and Compliance 

Unless already done, do the following 

actions specified in paragraphs (f)(1) through 

(f)(11) of this AD: 

(1) For airplanes previously affected by AD 

87–02–04, Amendment 39–5497 (51 FR 

47211, December 31, 1986): At the next 1,200 

MLG flight cycle repetitive inspection 

required by AD 87–02–04 or within the next 

12 months after the last 1,200 MLG flight 

cycle repetitive inspection required by AD 

87–02–04, whichever occurs first, and 

repetitively thereafter at intervals not to 

exceed 1,200 MLG flight cycles or 12 months, 

whichever occurs first, do a nondestructive 

testing (NDT) inspection of each MLG 

assembly cylinder attachment spigot housing 

following the Accomplishment Instructions 

in APPH Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 32–19, 

Revision 4, dated April 3, 2013, as referenced 

in British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 

3200 Service Bulletin 32–A–JA851226, 

Revision 5, dated April 30, 2013. 

(2) For airplanes not previously affected by 

AD 87–02–04, Amendment 39–5497 (51 FR 

47211, December 31, 1986): Within the next 

300 MLG flight cycles after the effective date 

of this AD or within the next 3 months after 

the effective date of this AD or at the next 

overhaul of the MLG after the effective date 

of this AD, whichever occurs first, and 

repetitively thereafter at intervals not to 

exceed 1,200 MLG flight cycles or 12 months, 

whichever occurs first, do a NDT inspection 

of each MLG assembly cylinder attachment 

spigot housing following the 

Accomplishment Instructions in APPH Ltd. 

Service Bulletin No. 32–19, Revision 4, dated 

April 3, 2013, as referenced in British 

Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 

Service Bulletin 32–A–JA851226, Revision 5, 

dated April 30, 2013. 

(3) For all airplanes: Within 300 landings 

after a heavy or abnormal landing, conduct 

a NDT inspection of each MLG assembly 

cylinder attachment spigot following 

Accomplishment Instructions in APPH Ltd. 

Service Bulletin No. 32–19, Revision 4, dated 

April 3, 2013, as referenced in British 

Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 

Service Bulletin 32–A–JA851226, Revision 5, 

dated April 30, 2013. 

(4) For all airplanes: If any crack is found 

during any inspection required in paragraphs 

(f)(1), (f)(2), or (f)(3) of this AD, before further 

flight, take all necessary corrective actions 

following the Accomplishment Instructions 

in APPH Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 32–19, 

Revision 4, dated April 3, 2013, as referenced 

in British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 

3200 Service Bulletin 32–A–JA851226, 

Revision 5, dated April 30, 2013. 

(5) For all airplanes: Within 300 MLG 

flight cycles or 3 months, whichever occurs 

first after each NDT inspection required in 

paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, as 

applicable, and repetitively thereafter at 

intervals not to exceed 300 MLG flight cycles 

or 3 months, whichever occurs first, do a 

visual inspection of each MLG following the 

Accomplishment Instructions in APPH Ltd. 

Service Bulletin No. 32–19, Revision 4, dated 

April 3, 2013, as referenced in British 

Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 

Service Bulletin 32–A–JA851226, Revision 5, 

dated April 30, 2013. 

(6) For all airplanes: If any discrepancy is 

found during any visual inspection required 

in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, before further 

flight, take all necessary corrective actions 

following the Accomplishment Instructions 

in APPH Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 32–19, 

Revision 4, dated April 3, 2013, as referenced 

in British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 

3200 Service Bulletin 32–A–JA851226, 

Revision 5, dated April 30, 2013. 

(7) For all airplanes with a MLG 

incorporating a microswitch hole: Within the 

next 10,600 MLG flight cycles since new and 

repetitively thereafter at intervals not to 

exceed 1,200 MLG flight cycles, do a NDT 

inspection of each MLG microswitch hole 

following the Accomplishment Instructions 

in APPH Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 32–40, 

Revision 1, dated February 2003 as 

referenced in Part C, paragraph (2)(b) of 

British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 

3200 Service Bulletin 32–A–JA851226, 

Revision 5, dated April 30, 2013. 

(8) For all airplanes: If any crack is found 

during any NDT inspection required in 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
2808 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 11 / Thursday, January 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

paragraph (f)(7) of this AD, before further 

flight, take all necessary corrective actions 

following the Accomplishment Instructions 

in APPH Ltd. Service Bulletin No. 32–40, 

Revision 1, dated February 2003, as 

referenced in British Aerospace Jetstream 

Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32–A– 

JA851226, Revision 5, dated April 30, 2013. 

(9) For all airplanes: Doing all necessary 

corrective actions required in paragraphs 

(f)(4), (f)(6), and (f)(8) of this AD does not 

constitute terminating action for the 

inspections required by this AD. 

(10) For all airplanes: Modification of each 

MLG cylinder following BAE Systems 

(Operations) Ltd. Service Bulletin 32– 

JA880340, original issue, dated January 6, 

1989, constitutes terminating action for the 

inspections required by this AD for that 

MLG. 

(11) For all airplanes: The compliance 

times in paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(3), (f)(5), and 

(f)(7) of this AD are presented in flight cycles 

(landings). If the total flight cycles have not 

been kept, multiply the total number of 

airplane hours time-in-service (TIS) by 0.75 

to calculate the cycles. For the purposes of 

this AD: 

(i) 100 hours TIS × .75 = 75 cycles; and 

(ii) 1,000 hours TIS × .75 = 750 cycles. 

(g) Credit for Actions Done in Accordance 

With Previous Service Information 

This AD allows credit for the initial 

inspection required in paragraph (f)(7) of this 

AD if done before the effective date of this 

AD following APPH Ltd. Service Bulletin 32– 

40, at Initial Issue dated June 21, 1989. 

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to 

ATTN: Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer, 

FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, 

Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 

telephone: (816) 329–4138; fax: (816) 329– 

4090; email: taylor.martin@faa.gov. Before 

using any approved AMOC on any airplane 

to which the AMOC applies, notify your 

appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the 

FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), 

or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, a federal 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, nor 

shall a person be subject to a penalty for 

failure to comply with a collection of 

information subject to the requirements of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that 

collection of information displays a current 

valid OMB Control Number. The OMB 

Control Number for this information 

collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for 

this collection of information is estimated to 

be approximately 5 minutes per response, 

including the time for reviewing instructions, 

completing and reviewing the collection of 

information. All responses to this collection 

of information are mandatory. Comments 

concerning the accuracy of this burden and 

suggestions for reducing the burden should 

be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence 

Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: 

Information Collection Clearance Officer, 

AES–200. 

(i) Related Information 

Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA) AD No.: 2013–0208, dated 

September 10, 2013, for related information. 

You may examine the MCAI on the Internet 

at http://www.regulations.gov by searching 

for and locating it in Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0020. For service information related to this 

AD, contact BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd, 

Customer Information Department, Prestwick 

International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, 

Scotland, United Kingdom; phone: +44 1292 

675207, fax: +44 1292 675704; email: 

RApublications@baesystems.com; Internet: 

http://www.jetstreamcentral.com. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Small Airplane 

Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, 

Missouri 64106. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

(816) 329–4148. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January 

8, 2014. 

Earl Lawrence, 

Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–00764 Filed 1–15–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0483; FRL–9905–20– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans and Title V 

Operating Permit Program; State of 

Iowa 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) for the state of Iowa. These 

revisions will amend the Iowa air 

quality rules to eliminate state-only 

emissions testing procedures and adopt 

Federal methods; to reduce notification 

time for portable plant relocations, and 

allow electronic submittals of 

notifications; to update air quality 

definitions to be consistent with Federal 

definitions, and to place into rule the 

specific procedures for conducting 

emissions testing. 

EPA is also proposing to approve 

revisions to the Iowa Title V Operating 

Permits Program to revise the definition 

of ‘‘EPA Reference Method,’’ and to 

adopt by reference the revised Title V 

Periodic Monitoring Guidance. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing by 

February 18, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2013–0483 by one of the following 

methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov. 

3. Mail: Amy Algoe-Eakin, 

Environmental Protection Agency, Air 

Planning and Development Branch, 

11201 Renner Road, Lenexa, Kansas 

66219. 

4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver 

your comments to: Amy Algoe-Eakin, 

Environmental Protection Agency, Air 

Planning and Development Branch, 

11201 Renner Road, Lenexa, Kansas 

66219. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office’s 

normal hours of operations. The 

Regional Office’s official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:00 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Algoe-Eakin at (913) 551–7942, or 

by email at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of the Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the state’s 

revision to the SIP as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

revision amendment and anticipates no 

relevant adverse comments to this 

action. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action, 

no further activity is contemplated in 

relation to this action. If EPA receives 

relevant adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rules 

based on this proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so 

at this time. Please note that if EPA 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1