35216 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2018 / Notices 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), 

respectively. Potassium citrate and crude 

calcium citrate are classifiable under 

2918.15.5000 and, if included in a mixture or 

blend, 3824.99.9295 of the HTSUS. Blends 

that include citric acid, sodium citrate, and 

potassium citrate are classifiable under 

3824.99.9295 of the HTSUS. Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise is 

dispositive. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15885 Filed 7–24–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[Application No. 84–29A12] 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

ACTION: Notice of Application for an 

Amended Export Trade Certificate of 

Review by Northwest Fruit Exporters, 

Application No. 84–29A12. 

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce, 

through the International Trade 

Administration, Office of Trade and 

Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’), has 

received an application for an amended 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

(‘‘Certificate’’) from Northwest Fruit 

Exporters. This notice summarizes the 

proposed amendment and seeks public 

comments on whether the amended 

Certificate should be issued. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade 

and Economic Analysis, International 

Trade Administration, by telephone at 

(202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free 

number) or email at etca@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of 

the Export Trading Company Act of 

1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the 

Secretary of Commerce to issue Export 

Trade Certificates of Review. An Export 

Trade Certificate of Review protects the 

holder and the members identified in 

the Certificate from State and Federal 

government antitrust actions and from 

private treble damage antitrust actions 

for the export conduct specified in the 

Certificate and carried out in 

compliance with its terms and 

conditions. Section 302(b)(1) of the 

Export Trading Company Act of 1982 

and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the 

Secretary to publish a notice in the 

Federal Register identifying the 

applicant and summarizing its proposed 

export conduct. 

Request for Public Comments 

Interested parties may submit written 

comments relevant to the determination 

whether an amended Certificate should 

be issued. If the comments include any 

privileged or confidential business 

information, it must be clearly marked 

and a nonconfidential version of the 

comments (identified as such) should be 

included. Any comments not marked as 

privileged or confidential business 

information will be deemed to be 

nonconfidential. 

An original and five (5) copies, plus 

two (2) copies of the nonconfidential 

version, should be submitted no later 

than 20 days after the date of this notice 

to: Office of Trade and Economic 

Analysis, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, Room 21028, Washington, 

DC 20230. 

Information submitted by any person 

is exempt from disclosure under the 

Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 

552). However, nonconfidential versions 

of the comments will be made available 

to the applicant if necessary for 

determining whether or not to issue the 

amended Certificate. Comments should 

refer to this application as ‘‘Export 

Trade Certificate of Review, application 

number 84–29A12.’’ 

A summary of the current application 

follows. 

Summary of the Application 

Applicant: Northwest Fruit Exporters, 

105 South 18th Street, Suite 227, 

Yakima, WA 98901. 

Contact: Fred Scarlett, Manager, (509) 

576–8004. 

Application No.: 84–29A12. 

Date Deemed Submitted: July 10, 

2018. 

Proposed Amendment: Northwest 

Fruit Exporters seeks to amend its 

Certificate as follows: 

1. Add the following companies as 

new Members of the Certificate within 

the meaning of section 325.2(l) of the 

Regulations (15 CFR 325.2(l)): 

• Pine Canyon Growers LLC, Orondo, 

WA 

• WP Packing LLC, Wapato, WA 

2. Delete the following companies as 

Members of the Certificate: 

• Columbia Fruit Packers/Airport 

Division, Wenatchee, WA 

• Phillippi Fruit Company, Inc., 

Wenatchee, WA 

• Western Traders LLC, E. Wenatchee, 

WA 

3. Change the name of the following 

Members of the Certificate: 

• Columbia Marketing International 

Corp., Wenatchee, WA, is now named 

CMI Orchards LLC, Wenatchee, WA 

• Pride Packing Company, Wapato, WA, 

is now named Pride Packing 

Company LLC, Wapato, WA 

4. Correct the name of the following 

Members of the Certificate: 

• Diamond Fruit Growers, Odell, OR, is 

corrected to Diamond Fruit Growers, 

Inc., Odell, OR 

• HoneyBear Growers, Inc., Brewster, 

WA, is corrected to HoneyBear 

Growers LLC, Brewster, WA 

• Honey Bear Tree Fruit Co., LLC, 

Wenatchee, WA, is corrected to 

Honey Bear Tree Fruit Co LLC, 

Wenatchee, WA 

• L&M Companies, Union Gap, WA, is 

corrected to L & M Companies, Union 

Gap, WA 

• Polehn Farm’s Inc., The Dalles, OR, is 

corrected to Polehn Farms, Inc., The 

Dalles, OR 

• Valicoff Fruit Co., Inc., Wapato, WA, 

is corrected to Valicoff Fruit Company 

Inc., Wapato, WA 

Northwest Fruit Exporter’s proposed 

amendment of its Export Trade 

Certificate of Review would result in the 

following Membership list: 

1. Allan Bros., Naches, WA 

2. AltaFresh L.L.C. dba Chelan Fresh 

Marketing, Chelan, WA 

3. Apple House Warehouse & Storage, Inc., 

Brewster, WA 

4. Apple King, L.L.C., Yakima, WA 

5. Auvil Fruit Co., Inc., Orondo, WA 

6. Baker Produce, Inc., Kennewick, WA 

7. Blue Bird, Inc., Peshastin, WA 

8. Blue Star Growers, Inc., Cashmere, WA 

9. Borton & Sons, Inc., Yakima, WA 

10. Brewster Heights Packing & Orchards, LP, 

Brewster, WA 

11. Broetje Orchards LLC, Prescott, WA 

12. C.M. Holtzinger Fruit Co., Inc., Yakima, 

WA 

13. Chelan Fruit Cooperative, Chelan, WA 

14. Chiawana, Inc. dba Columbia Reach Pack, 

Yakima, WA 

15. CMI Orchards LLC, Wenatchee, WA 

16. Columbia Fruit Packers, Inc., Wenatchee, 

WA 

17. Columbia Valley Fruit, L.L.C., Yakima, 

WA 

18. Congdon Packing Co. L.L.C., Yakima, WA 

19. Conrad & Adams Fruit L.L.C., Grandview, 

WA 

20. Cowiche Growers, Inc., Cowiche, WA 

21. CPC International Apple Company, 

Tieton, WA 

22. Crane & Crane, Inc., Brewster, WA 

23. Custom Apple Packers, Inc., Quincy and 

Wenatchee, WA 

24. Diamond Fruit Growers, Inc., Odell, OR 

25. Domex Superfresh Growers LLC, Yakima, 

WA 

26. Douglas Fruit Company, Inc., Pasco, WA 

27. Dovex Export Company, Wenatchee, WA 

28. Duckwall Fruit, Odell, OR 

29. E. Brown & Sons, Inc., Milton-Freewater, 

OR 

30. Evans Fruit Co., Inc., Yakima, WA 

31. E.W. Brandt & Sons, Inc., Parker, WA 

32. Frosty Packing Co., LLC, Yakima, WA 

33. G&G Orchards, Inc., Yakima, WA 

34. Gilbert Orchards, Inc., Yakima, WA 

35. Hansen Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Inc., 

Yakima, WA 

36. Henggeler Packing Co., Inc., Fruitland, ID 

37. Highland Fruit Growers, Inc., Yakima, 

WA 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2018 / Notices 35217 

1See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 76 FR 64318 

(October 18, 2011) (Final Determination). 

2See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 76690 (December 

8, 2011) (First Amended Final Determination and 

Order). 

3 Id. 

4The full names of those companies are Zheijiang 

Layo Wood Industry Co. Ltd. (Layo Wood) and 

Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd., 

Riverside Plywood Corporation, Samling Elegant 

Living Trading (Labuan) Limited, Samling Global 

USA, Inc., Samling Riverside Co., Ltd., and Suzhou 

Times Flooring Co., Ltd. (collectively Samling 

Group). 

5See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court 

Decision Not in Harmony With the Final 

Determination and Amended Final Determination 

of the Antidumping Duty Investigation, 79 FR 25109 

(May 2, 2014) (Second Amended Final 

Determination). 

6See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Order, Baroque Timber Industries 

(Zhongshan) Company, Limited, et al. v. United 

States, dated November 14, 2013 (First Remand 

Redetermination), at 2–3. 

7 Id. 

38. HoneyBear Growers LLC, Brewster, WA 

39. Honey Bear Tree Fruit Co LLC, 

Wenatchee, WA 

40. Hood River Cherry Company, Hood River, 

OR 

41. Ice Lakes LLC, East Wenatchee, WA 

42. JackAss Mt. Ranch, Pasco, WA 

43. Jenks Bros Cold Storage & Packing, Royal 

City, WA 

44. Kershaw Fruit & Cold Storage, Co., 

Yakima, WA 

45. L & M Companies, Union Gap, WA 

46. Larson Fruit Co., Selah, WA 

47. Legacy Fruit Packers LLC, Wapato, WA 

48. Manson Growers Cooperative, Manson, 

WA 

49. Matson Fruit Company, Selah, WA 

50. McDougall & Sons, Inc., Wenatchee, WA 

51. Monson Fruit Co., Selah, WA 

52. Morgan’s of Washington dba Double 

Diamond Fruit, Quincy, WA 

53. Naumes, Inc., Medford, OR 

54. Northern Fruit Company, Inc., 

Wenatchee, WA 

55. Olympic Fruit Co., Moxee, WA 

56. Oneonta Trading Corp., Wenatchee, WA 

57. Orchard View Farms, Inc., The Dalles, OR 

58. Pacific Coast Cherry Packers, LLC, 

Yakima, WA 

59. Peshastin Hi-Up Growers, Peshastin, WA 

60. Piepel Premium Fruit Packing LLC, East 

Wenatchee, WA 

61. Pine Canyon Growers LLC, Orondo, WA 

62. Polehn Farms, Inc., The Dalles, OR 

63. Price Cold Storage & Packing Co., Inc., 

Yakima, WA 

64. Pride Packing Company LLC, Wapato, 

WA 

65. Quincy Fresh Fruit Co., Quincy, WA 

66. Rainier Fruit Company, Selah, WA 

67. Roche Fruit, Ltd., Yakima, WA 

68. Sage Fruit Company, L.L.C., Yakima, WA 

69. Smith & Nelson, Inc., Tonasket, WA 

70. Stadelman Fruit, L.L.C., MiltonFreewater, OR, and Zillah, WA 

71. Stemilt Growers, LLC, Wenatchee, WA 

72. Strand Apples, Inc., Cowiche, WA 

73. Symms Fruit Ranch, Inc., Caldwell, ID 

74. The Dalles Fruit Company, LLC, 

Dallesport, WA 

75. Underwood Fruit & Warehouse Co., 

Bingen, WA 

76. Valicoff Fruit Company Inc., Wapato, WA 

77. Washington Cherry Growers, Peshastin, 

WA 

78. Washington Fruit & Produce Co., Yakima, 

WA 

79. Western Sweet Cherry Group, LLC, 

Yakima, WA 

80. Whitby Farms, Inc. dba: Farm Boy Fruit 

Snacks LLC, Mesa, WA 

81. WP Packing LLC, Wapato, WA 

82. Yakima Fresh, Yakima, WA 

83. Yakima Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Yakima, 

WA 

84. Zirkle Fruit Company, Selah, WA 

Dated: July 20, 2018. 

Joseph Flynn, 

Director, Office of Trade and Economic 

Analysis, International Trade Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15925 Filed 7–24–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

the Second Amended Final 

Determination and Notice of Third 

Amended Final Determination of the 

Antidumping Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 3, 2018, the United 

States Court of International Trade (CIT 

or Court) entered its final judgment in 

Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. 

United States, sustaining, in part, the 

final results of remand redetermination 

pursuant to court order by the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

pertaining to the less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation on multilayered 

wood flooring from the People’s 

Republic of China (China). Commerce is 

notifying the public that the final 

judgment in this case is not in harmony 

with Commerce’s final determination in 

the LTFV investigation of multilayered 

wood flooring from China. Pursuant to 

the CIT’s final judgment, Dunhua City 

Jisen Wood Industry Co., Ltd., Fine 

Furniture (Shanghai) Limited, and 

Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) 

Co., Ltd. are being excluded from the 

order. 

DATES: Applicable July 13, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Aleksandras Nakutis, Office IV, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3147. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The litigation in this case relates to 

Commerce’s final determination in the 

antidumping duty investigation 

covering multilayered wood flooring 

from China,1 which was later amended.2

In the First Amended Final 

Determination and Order, Commerce 

assigned a rate of 3.30 percent to all 

separate rate respondents.3 Commerce 

derived this rate by averaging the rates 

of the two individually investigated 

respondents with weighted-average 

margins above de minimis, pursuant to 

section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). Pursuant to 

a series of remand orders issued by the 

Court that resulted in five remand 

redeterminations, Commerce (1) revised 

its calculation of dumping margins for 

two mandatory respondents and the 

China-wide entity; and, (2) made certain 

findings regarding the dumping margins 

that were calculated for eight separate 

rate respondents that were plaintiffs in 

the litigation. 

Regarding the dumping margins for 

two mandatory respondents in the 

investigation, on April 23, 2014, the 

Court granted a consent motion for 

severance and entered final judgment in 

Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) 

Company, Limited v. United States with 

respect to Layo Wood and the Samling 

Group.4 Consistent with the decision of 

the United States Court of Appeals for 

the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken 

Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. 

Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by 

Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. 

United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 

2010) (Diamond Sawblades), Commerce 

gave notice of this decision, as well as 

the amended dumping margins of zero 

percent calculated for Layo Wood and 

Samling Group.5 Further, because 

Commerce changed the surrogate values 

in its first remand redetermination for 

mandatory respondents Layo Wood and 

Samling Group,6 the highest calculated 

transaction-specific rate on the record 

became 25.62 percent, which Commerce 

assigned to the China-wide entity.7 The 

CIT sustained Commerce’s remand 

redetermination as it pertained to Layo 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES