alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Changjun Yu, the
Chief Executive Officer of CHINA NUTRIFRUIT GROUP LIMITED (the Company), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this statement this 22nd day of June, 2011.

| | /s/
      Changjun Yu        
| | -----------------------------
| | Changjun Yu                  
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Nutrifruit Group Limited and will be retained by
China Nutrifruit Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
EXHIBIT 10.7(e)

    

    

    SCHEDULE A TO EXHIBIT 10.7(b)

    

    

    The following individuals entered into a First Amendment to the Ohio Valley Bank Company Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement with The Ohio Valley
      Bank Company which are identical to the First Amendment to the Ohio Valley Bank Company Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated January 26, 2016, filed herewith.

    

    

    	
            Name

          	 	
            Date of Agreement

          
	 	 	 
	
            Thomas E. Wiseman

          	 	
            January 26, 2016

          
	 	 	 
	
            Scott W. Shockey

          	 	
            January 26, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will conduct an open meeting and will solicit public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 21, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or (737) 800-4060.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Tuesday, August 21, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent                           ( print page 31838)                        to participate must be made with Gilbert Martinez. For more information please contact Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6523, or write TAP Office, 3651 S IH-35, STOP 1005 AUSC, Austin, TX 78741, or post comments to the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The committee will be discussing various issues related to the Taxpayer Assistance Centers and public input is welcomed.

Dated: July 2, 2018.

Terrie English,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2018-14643 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VOLUNTEER BANCORP, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,087,064
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,661,525
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,593,525
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,068,241
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,080,163
<LOANS>                                     58,213,792
<ALLOWANCE>                                    761,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,835,567
<DEPOSITS>                                  83,890,533
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,615,953
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,027,108
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,045,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,390
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,251,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              93,835,567
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,926,963
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              967,738
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               245,969
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,140,670
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,684,733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,941,555
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,199,115
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  180,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              22,672
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,758,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                485,907
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     309,312
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   309,312
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.53
<LOANS-NON>                                     20,095
<LOANS-PAST>                                   326,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               660,336
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   81,971
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,356
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              761,721
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           761,721
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1064 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for treatment 

of clinical psychologists as physicians for purposes of furnishing clinical 

psychologist services under the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2013 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for treatment of clinical psychologists as physicians for 

purposes of furnishing clinical psychologist services under 

the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Mental 

5 Health Access Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1064 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS AS PHY2 SICIANS FOR PURPOSES OF FURNISHING 

3 CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST SERVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

5 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ before ‘‘(5)’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting before the period the following: 

9 ‘‘, or (6) a clinical psychologist, but only with re10 spect to the furnishing of qualified psychologist serv11 ices described in subsection (ii) for which the psy12 chologist is legally authorized to perform by the 

13 State and who is acting within the scope of the psy14 chologist’s license (or other authorization under 

15 State law)’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished 

18 on or after January 1, 2014. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### CITIZENS BANKING COMPANY et al., Intervening Bondholders, Appellants, v. STURGEON BAY COMPANY, Debtor, Appellee.

No. 7490.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 11, 1937.

Dorr E. Warner, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.

Sayre, Vail & Dorn, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause being now before the court upon a motion to dismiss the appeal,- and

It appearing that, while the appeal is from a final order of discharge in a debtor proceeding under section 77B of the National Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C.A. § 207), it complains of the terms of a plan of reorganization approved by a requisite number of creditors of the debtor and confirmed by a prior order of the District Judge,

And it further appearing that an appeal earlier taken by the present appellant from the order of confirmation because involving a “proceeding” rather than a “controversy” in bankruptcy (Meyer v. Kenmore Hotel Co., 297 U.S. 160, 56 S.Ct. 405, 80 L.Ed. 557, was taken without leave of this court (required by section 24b of the Bankruptcy Law as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 47(b) and so was on motion dismissed,

And it further appearing by reference to assignments of error that appellants now seek review of the identical order sought to be reviewed in the abortive appeal heretofore dismissed, and the time for such review having expired, and

It being the conclusion of the court that under the guise of an appeal from an order of discharge the order confirming a reorganization plan, already executed, may not now be reviewed,

It is hereby ordered that the above appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed.
Appeals Reinstated, Judgments Affirmed , and Memorandum Opinion filed

April 14, 2020

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00263

- CR NO. 14

- 19

- 00264

- CR NO. 14

- 19

- 00265

- CR

RODERICK PALMS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1557128, 1557129, and 1557130

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N These appeals were abated on March 5, 2020. We reinstate the appeals.

Roderick Palms appeals his three convi ctions for aggravated robbery. Tex.
Penal Code § 29.03(a)(2) . Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he
concludes the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a2

professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811

– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
of his right to inspect the appellate records and file a pro se response to the brief. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60 days have passed and no pro se resp onse has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel’s brief and agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the
records . We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an An ders brief when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v.
State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the trial court’s judgments are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.

Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### Rudolph Jerome AUSTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-545.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Stewart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal quashed.
#### Carr *versus*Chartiers Coal Company.

The secretary of a private corporation, at a fixed salary, cannot recover’ extra pay for services in that capacity.

Error to the District Court of *Allegheny county.*

The action below was *assumpsit*by the Chartiers Coal Company, an incorporated body, to recover from its secretary, Carr, the defendant below, |200 retained by him beyond his annual salary, for extra services which he claimed to have rendered the company in numbering, filling, and countersigning coupon bonds issued by the company. The cause being submitted to the Court below upon a case stated, judgment was entered for the plaintiff below; to reverse which the defendant sued out this writ.

*Mellon*and Stanton, for plaintiff in error. —

The presumption of law and of fact is, that the annual salary compensated no more than the regular and defined duty; and it being shown that this duty was not within the enumeration, and it being admitted to have been worth the full amount of $200, the law implies an undertaking to pay for it. The work being shown to be extra, is therefore entitled to extra compensation; for it is a well established principle of law “ that, if work additional to that contemplated in the original contract be done at the request of the party benefited by it, he will be liable therefor, upon an implied promise to pay for it: *Story on*Contracts, § 15, citing Lovelock *v.*King, 1 *Moody & Rob.*60; Dubois *v.*Canal Co., 12 *Wend.*334; Damin *v.*Granby, 2 *Pick.*345; Hoadly *v.*McLean, 4 *Manning & Scott*340.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Black, J. —

A person employed as the secretary of a private corporation, at a fixed rate of compensation, cannot demand extra pay for services in that capacity, which were not anticipated at the time of his appointment, or which were not enumerated in the charter or by-laws. The fair construction of his contract is, that he will do whatever his employers may have occasion to employ a secretary about.

' Judgment affirmed.
260 La. 691

#### Louis C. PENDLETON v. Alphonse JACKSON, Jr., et al.

No. 52147.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 8, 1972.

In re: Louis C. Pendleton applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 256 So.2d 494.

The application is denied. The result reached by the Court of Appeal is correct.
CHARLES J. EATO,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5657

Opinion filed June 2, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Charles J. Eato, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew F. Vitale, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Posey L. CUNDIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-16.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 10, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 26, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of LOUD Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James T. Engen and Timothy P.O’Neil, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   November 12, 2004 | By:      | /s/ James T.  Engen                                                  |
|---------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |     | James T.  Engen                                                      |
|                            | * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer*                              |
| * *                        | * * | * *                                                             |
|                            |     | /s/ Timothy  P. O’Neil                                          |   |
|                            |     | Timothy P.  O’Neil                                              |
|                            | * * | *Chief Financial Officer, Vice  President, Secretary and  Treasurer* |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LOUDTechnologies Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

#2369429 — v2

 

1

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
ICC Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-37036, 33-37037,
33-85634, 33-85636, 33-89122 and 33-89124) of our report, which includes an
explanatory paragraph which refers to conditions that raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated March 19,
1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of ICC
Technologies, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994, which report is included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (set
forth above) of the Company of our report, which includes an explanatory
paragraph which refers to conditions that raise substantial doubt about
Engelhard/ICC's ability to continue as a going concern, dated March 19, 1997,
on our audits of the financial statements of Engelhard/ICC as of December 31,
1996 and 1995 and for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, which report
is also included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 27, 1997
EXHIBIT 11

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE




                                                              Three Months Ended
                                                               December 31, 1997
                                                               -----------------

Net Income                                                       $   458,790
                                                                   =========

Weighted average shares outstanding                                3,111,387

Reduction for common shares not yet
 released by Employee Stock Ownership Plan                          (255,080)
                                                                   ---------

Total weighted average common shares
 outstanding for basic computation                                 2,856,307
                                                                   =========

Basic earnings per share                                         $       .16
                                                                         ===

Total weighted average common shares
 outstanding for basic computation                                 2,856,307

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
 effect of stock options                                             122,648
                                                                   ---------

Total weighted average common shares and
 equivalents outstanding for diluted computation                   2,978,955
                                                                   =========

Diluted earnings per share                                       $       .15
                                                                         ===

                                      -17-
EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-37913, 33-41664, 33-41665, 33-41783, 33-65754, 33-71008,
33-71010, 33-86368, 33-86370, 33-86372, 333-03427, 333-03429, 333-65497,
333-65499, 333-65501, 333-72395) pertaining to the Micrografx, Inc. Incentive
and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended, the Micrografx, Inc. Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, the Micrografx, Inc. Restricted Stock Purchase
Plan and the Micrografx, Inc. Directors Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, of our
report dated September 28, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Micrografx, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1999.

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas
September 28, 1999



<PAGE>
#### L. A. HORSTED a/k/a L. A. Halsted a/k/a Alex Leonard a/k/a Willie C. Horsted, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-46.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 6, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.