FORM 10-KSB--ANNUAL OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER
                             SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

                                   Form 10-KSB
(Mark One)
[X]   ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      OF 1934
      [No Fee Required]

                 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934
      [No Fee Required]

             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099

                      CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

         California                                              94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                       Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                   (Address of principal executive offices)

                   Issuer's telephone number (864) 239-1000

        Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

                                      None

        Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

                      Units of Limited Partnership Interest
                                (Title of class)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X  No___

Check if there is no disclosure  of delinquent  filers in response to Item 405
of  Regulation  S-B  contained  in  this  form,  and  no  disclosure  will  be
contained,  to the best of the  registrant's  knowledge in definitive proxy or
information  statements  incorporated  by  reference  in Part III of this Form
10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  [X]

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year.  $1,845,000

State the aggregate  market value of the voting  partnership  interests  held by
non-affiliates  computed  by  reference  to the price at which  the  partnership
interests  were sold,  or the average bid and asked  prices of such  partnership
interests as of December 31, 2001. No market exists for the limited  partnership
interests of the Registrant,  and,  therefore,  no aggregate market value can be
determined.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
                                      None

<PAGE>
                                     PART I

Item 1.     Description of Business

Consolidated  Capital  Properties VI (the  "Partnership"  or  "Registrant")  was
organized on May 23, 1984, as a limited  partnership  under  California  Uniform
Limited  Partnership  Act.  The  general  partner of the  Partnership  is ConCap
Equities,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "General  Partner" or "CEI").  The
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment  Investment and Management  Company
("AIMCO").  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  that  the  Partnership  is to
terminate on December 31, 2015 unless terminated prior to such date.

On December 7, 1984, the Partnership  offered $50,000,000 of Limited Partnership
Interest  (the  "Units")  pursuant to a  Registration  Statement  filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Units represent equity interests in the
Partnership   and  entitle  the  holders   thereof  to  participate  in  certain
allocations and  distributions of the  Partnership.  The sale of Units closed on
December 6, 1985,  with 181,808  Units sold at $250 each,  or gross  proceeds of
approximately  $45,452,000 to the Partnership.  Since its initial offering,  the
Registrant  has not  received,  nor  are  limited  partners  required  to  make,
additional capital contributions.

The  Registrant  is engaged in the business of operating and holding real estate
properties  for  investment.  By the end of fiscal  1987,  the  Partnership  had
acquired  seven  properties  and a 75%  interest  in a  joint  venture  with  an
affiliated  partnership which acquired one property. The Registrant continues to
own  and  operate  one  of  these  properties.  (See  "Item  2,  Description  of
Properties".)

The  real  estate  business  in which  the  Partnership  is  engaged  is  highly
competitive.  There are other  residential  properties within the market area of
the  Registrant's  property.  The number and quality of competitive  properties,
including  those which may be managed by an affiliate of the General  Partner in
such  market  area,  could have a material  effect on the rental  market for the
apartments  at the  Registrant's  property and the rents that may be charged for
such apartments. While the General Partner and its affiliates own and/or control
a  significant  number of  apartment  units in the  United  States,  such  units
represent an  insignificant  percentage of total  apartment  units in the United
States and competition for apartments is local.

The Registrant  has no employees.  Management  and  administrative  services are
provided by the General Partner and by agents retained by the General Partner.

Upon  the  Partnership's   formation  in  1984,  Consolidated  Capital  Equities
Corporation ("CCEC"), a Colorado corporation,  was the corporate general partner
and Consolidated Capital Group II ("CCG"), a California general partnership, was
the non-corporate  general partner.  In 1988,  through a series of transactions,
Southmark  Corporation  ("Southmark")  acquired controlling interest in CCEC. In
December  1988,  CCEC filed for  reorganization  under  Chapter 11 of the United
States  Bankruptcy  Code. In 1990, as part of CCEC's  reorganization  plan,  CEI
acquired  CCEC's general  partner  interests in the  Partnership and in 15 other
affiliated public limited  partnerships (the "Affiliated  Partnerships") and CEI
replaced CCEC as managing general partner in all 16 partnerships.  The selection
of CEI as the sole  managing  general  partner was approved by a majority of the
limited  partners in the Partnership and in each of the Affiliated  Partnerships
pursuant to a  solicitation  of the Limited  Partners  dated August 10, 1990. As
part of this  solicitation,  the Limited  Partners also approved an amendment to
the  Partnership  Agreement  limiting  changes of control of the Partnership and
approved conversion of the general partner interest of the non-corporate general
partner,  CCG, to that of a special limited partner  ("Special Limited Partner")
without  voting and without  other  rights of a limited  partner  except for the
economic  interest  previously  held  as a  general  partner.  Pursuant  to this
amendment  to the  Partnership  Agreement,  the  non-corporate  general  partner
interest  of CCG was  converted  to that of a Special  Limited  Partner  and CEI
became the sole general partner of the Partnership on December 31, 1991.

Prior to December 1994, all of CEI's  outstanding stock was owned by GII Realty,
Inc.  In  December  1994,  the  parent  of  GII  Realty,  Inc.,  entered  into a
transaction  (the  "Insignia  Transaction")  in which an  affiliate  of Insignia
Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia"),  acquired an option (exercisable in whole or
in part from time to time) to purchase all of the stock of GII Realty, Inc. and,
pursuant to a partial exercise of such option,  acquired 50.5% of that stock. As
a part of the Insignia Transaction,  the Insignia affiliate also acquired all of
the outstanding stock of Partnership Services, Inc., an asset management entity,
and Insignia acquired all of the outstanding stock of Coventry Properties, Inc.,
a property management entity. In addition, confidentiality, non-competition, and
standstill  arrangements were entered into between certain of the parties. Those
arrangements,   among  other  things,   prohibited  GII  Realty's   former  sole
shareholder  from purchasing  Partnership  Units for a period of three years. On
October 24, 1995, the Insignia affiliate  exercised the remaining portion of its
option to purchase all of the remaining outstanding capital stock of GII Realty,
Inc.

Both the income and expenses of operating the property owned by the  Partnership
are subject to factors outside of the Partnership's  control, such as changes in
the supply and demand for  similar  properties  resulting  from  various  market
conditions, increases/decreases in unemployment or population shifts, changes in
the  availability of permanent  mortgage  financing,  changes in zoning laws, or
changes in patterns or needs of users. In addition,  there are risks inherent in
owning  and  operating  residential   properties  because  such  properties  are
susceptible  to the  impact of  economic  and other  conditions  outside  of the
control of the Partnership.

There have been, and it is possible there may be other, Federal, state and local
legislation  and  regulations   enacted   relating  to  the  protection  of  the
environment.  The Partnership is unable to predict the extent,  if any, to which
such new  legislation  or  regulations  might occur and the degree to which such
existing or new legislation or regulations  might adversely  affect the property
owned by the Partnership.

The  Partnership  monitors its property for evidence of  pollutants,  toxins and
other dangerous substances, including the presence of asbestos. In certain cases
environmental testing has been performed,  which resulted in no material adverse
conditions or liabilities.  In no case has the Partnership  received notice that
it is a potentially  responsible party with respect to an environmental clean up
site.

A further  description  of the  Partnership's  business  is included in "Item 6.
Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation" included in this Form
10-KSB.

Item 2.     Description of Property

The following table sets forth the Partnership's investment in property:

                           Date of
Property                   Purchase      Type of Ownership             Use

Colony of Springdale
  Apartments               02/20/87   Fee ownership subject        Apartment
  Springdale, Ohio                    to first mortgage. (1)       261 units

(1)   Property is held by a limited  partnership in which the Registrant  owns a
      100% interest.

Schedule of Property

Set forth  below for the  Registrant's  property  is the gross  carrying  value,
accumulated  depreciation,  depreciable life, method of depreciation and Federal
tax basis.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                            Gross
                           Carrying   Accumulated                         Federal
Property                    Value     Depreciation    Rate    Method     Tax Basis
                               (in thousands)                          (in thousands)

<S>                        <C>          <C>         <C>                   <C>
Colony of Springdale       $10,904      $ 5,202     5-30 yrs    S/L       $ 5,065
</TABLE>

See the "Note A" included in "Item 7. Financial Statements" for a description of
the Partnership's depreciation policy.

Schedule of Property Indebtedness
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                           Principal                                        Principal
                           Balance At     Stated                             Balance
                          December 31,   Interest    Period    Maturity      Due At
       Property               2001         Rate    Amortized     Date      Maturity (1)
                         (in thousands)

Colony of Springdale
<S>                          <C>           <C>       <C>       <C>            <C>
  1st mortgage               $5,336        7.79%     20 yrs    11/2019        $ --
</TABLE>

(1)   See "Item 7. Financial Statements, Note E" for information with respect to
      the  Registrant's  ability to repay this loan and other  specific  details
      about the loan.

Rental Rates and Occupancy

Average annual rental rate and occupancy for 2001 and 2000 for the property:

                                       Average Annual            Average Annual
                                        Rental Rate                 Occupancy
                                         (per unit)
 Property                           2001          2000         2001        2000

 Colony of Springdale              $7,366        $7,339         92%         92%

As noted under "Item 1.  Description of Business",  the real estate  industry is
highly  competitive.  The Partnership's  property is subject to competition from
other residential  apartment complexes in the area. The General Partner believes
that the property is adequately  insured.  The property is an apartment  complex
which leases units for lease terms of one year or less.  No  residential  tenant
leases  10% or more of the  available  rental  space.  The  property  is in good
physical  condition,  subject to normal  depreciation  and  deterioration  as is
typical for assets of this type and age.

Real Estate Taxes and Rates

Real estate taxes and the tax rate in 2001 for the property were:

                                    2001             2001
                                    Taxes            Rate
                               (in thousands)

Colony of Springdale                $ 131            4.68%

Capital Improvements

During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Partnership completed approximately
$303,000 of capital improvements at the property.  These improvements  consisted
of  roof  replacement,   floor  covering,  appliance  replacements,   structural
improvements,  and air conditioning unit  replacements.  These improvements were
funded from cash from  operations  and insurance  proceeds.  The  Partnership is
currently  evaluating  the capital  improvement  needs of the  property  for the
upcoming year. The minimum amount to be budgeted is expected to be $300 per unit
or  approximately  $78,000.  The  capital  improvements  planned for 2002 at the
Partnership's  property will be made only to the extent of cash  available  from
operations.

Item 3.     Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General  Partner and affiliated  defendants  intend to oppose the motion and are
scheduled  to file their  opposition  brief on March 26,  2002. A hearing on the
motion has been  scheduled for April 29, 2002.  The Court has set the matter for
trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

During the quarter ended  December 31, 2001, no matters were submitted to a vote
of the unit holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.


                                     PART II

Item 5.     Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Security
            Holder Matters

The Partnership,  a publicly-held limited partnership,  offered and sold 181,808
limited partnership units aggregating $45,452,000. The Partnership currently has
2,657 holders of record owning an aggregate of 181,300 Units.  Affiliates of the
General  Partner  owned 88,726  units or 48.94% at December 31, 2001.  No public
trading market has developed for the Units,  and it is not anticipated that such
a market will develop in the future.

The following table sets forth the distribution from operations  declared by the
Partnership  for the  years  ended  December  31,  2001 and 2000  (see  "Item 6.
Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation" for further details):

                                                Distribution
                                                           Per Limited
                                        Aggregate        Partnership Unit
                                      (in thousands)

       01/01/00 - 12/31/00                 $ --                $ --
       01/01/01 - 12/31/01                    534               2.83

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations,  the  availability  of cash  reserves  and the  timing  of the  debt
maturity,  refinancing,  and/or sale of the  property.  The  Partnership's  cash
available  for  distribution  is  reviewed on a monthly  basis.  There can be no
assurance that the Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from operations
after required capital  expenditures to permit any distributions to its partners
in 2002 or subsequent periods.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 88,726 limited  partnership  units
("Units") in the Partnership  representing  48.94% of the  outstanding  Units at
December  31,  2001.  A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will make one or more additional offers to acquire additional limited
partnership  interests in the  Partnership  for cash or in exchange for units in
the operating  partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender
offers. Under the Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders holding a majority of the
Units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of matters,  which
would  include  voting on certain  amendments to the  Partnership  Agreement and
voting to remove the General Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 48.94% of
the outstanding  Units,  AIMCO is in a position to  significantly  influence all
such voting  decisions with respect to the  Registrant.  When voting on matters,
AIMCO would in all likelihood  vote the Units it acquired in a manner  favorable
to the  interest  of the General  Partner  because of its  affiliation  with the
General Partner.


Item 6.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-KSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions, competitive and regulatory matters, etc.) detailed in the disclosure
contained  in this Form 10-KSB and the other  filings  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission made by the Registrant from time to time. The discussion of
the Registrant's business and results of operations,  including  forward-looking
statements pertaining to such matters, does not take into account the effects of
any changes to the Registrant's business and results of operation.  Accordingly,
actual   results   could  differ   materially   from  those   projected  in  the
forward-looking  statements as a result of a number of factors,  including those
identified herein.

This  item  should  be read  in  conjunction  with  the  consolidated  financial
statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report.

Results of Operations

The   Partnership's  net  loss  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2001,  was
approximately  $171,000 compared to a net loss of approximately $204,000 for the
year ended  December 31, 2000.  The decrease in net loss is due to a decrease in
total expenses  partially  offset by a slight  decrease in total  revenues.  The
decrease in total expenses resulted from a decrease in interest and property tax
expenses,  partially offset by an increase in operating expense. The decrease in
interest expense is due to additional  interest being paid during the year ended
December 31, 2000, related to the refinance of the Partnership's  property.  The
decrease in property  tax expense is due to the timing of the receipt of the tax
bills,  which  affected the  recording of the related  accrual.  The increase in
operating  expense is primarily  due to an increase in payroll costs and utility
charges at the Partnership's property.

The decrease in revenues is due to a decrease in rental income largely offset by
an increase in other income and a casualty gain at the Partnership's property as
discussed  below.  Rental  income  decreased  as a  result  of  an  increase  in
concessions  offered  to  tenants.  Other  income  increased  as a result  of an
increase in late charges  collected,  slightly  offset by a decrease in interest
income due to lower  average cash  balances in interest  bearing  accounts and a
lower interest rate being offered on those accounts.

During the year ended  December  31,  2001,  a  casualty  gain of  approximately
$43,000 was recognized at the Colony of Springdale Apartments. The casualty gain
was related to a fire,  which  resulted from a lightning  strike in August 2001.
The gain  resulted  from the  receipt of  insurance  proceeds  of  approximately
$73,000,  net of  the  write  off of  undepreciated  property  improvements  and
replacements of approximately $30,000.

Included in general and administrative expenses are management reimbursements to
the General Partner allowed under the  Partnership  Agreement.  Also included in
general and administrative  expenses are costs associated with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment  property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions,  which
can  result in the use of rental  concessions  and rental  reductions  to offset
softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will
be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  December  31,  2001,  the  Partnership  had  cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately  $240,000 compared to approximately $810,000 at December 31, 2000.
Cash and cash  equivalents  decreased  approximately  $570,000 from December 31,
2000 due to  approximately  $535,000 and $230,000 of cash used in financing  and
investing activities,  respectively,  partially offset by approximately $195,000
of cash  provided by operating  activities.  Cash used in  financing  activities
consisted  primarily of distributions  to the partners,  and to a lesser extent,
principal payments made on the mortgage  encumbering the Partnership's  property
and payments on advances from an affiliate  partially offset by advances from an
affiliate.  Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements
and  replacements   partially  offset  by  insurance  proceeds   received.   The
Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

In  accordance  with the  Partnership  Agreement,  an  affiliate  of the General
Partner advanced the Partnership  $158,000 to cover operating expenses at Colony
of  Springdale   Apartments  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2001.  The
Partnership repaid approximately $19,000 of this advance including approximately
$1,000 in accrued interest.  Interest is being charged at the prime rate plus 2%
and  amounted  to  approximately  $2,000.  There were no loans from the  General
Partner or associated interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2000.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  Partnership  is  currently
evaluating the capital  improvement needs of the property for the upcoming year.
The  minimum  amount  to  be  budgeted  is  expected  to be  $300  per  unit  or
approximately $78,000. Additional improvements may be considered and will depend
on the  physical  condition  of the  property as well as  anticipated  cash flow
generated by the  property.  The capital  expenditures  will be incurred only if
cash is available from operations or from  Partnership  reserves.  To the extent
that  such  budgeted  capital  improvements  are  completed,   the  Registrant's
distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short
term.

The  Registrant's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $5,336,000 matures in November 2019 at which time
the mortgage is scheduled to be fully amortized.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,  the term of the Partnership is scheduled
to expire on December 31, 2015. Accordingly,  prior to such date the Partnership
will need to  either  sell its  investment  property  or extend  the term of the
Partnership.  If the Partnership is unable to extend its term, the ultimate sale
price of the investment property may be adversely affected.

On September 16, 2000, the Partnership  sought the vote of the limited  partners
to  amend  the  Partnership  Agreement  to  eliminate  the  requirement  for the
Partnership to maintain  reserves equal to at least 5% of the limited  partners'
capital  contributions  less  distributions.  The vote was sought  pursuant to a
Consent  Solicitation  that  expired  on  October  16,  2000 at  which  time the
amendment  was  approved  by  the  requisite  percent  of  limited   partnership
interests.

During the year  ended  December  31,  2001,  a  distribution  of  approximately
$534,000 was declared and paid  (approximately  $513,000 to the limited partners
or $2.83 per limited  partnership  unit) consisting of funds from operations.  A
distribution  of  approximately  $2,297,000  (approximately  $2,250,000  to  the
limited  partners or $12.41 per  limited  partnership  unit) was accrued  during
December 1999 and paid in January 2000. This distribution consisted of cash from
operations of approximately $1,175,000  (approximately $1,128,000 to the limited
partners  or $6.22 per limited  partnership  unit) and  refinancing  proceeds of
approximately  $1,122,000 to the limited partners ($6.19 per limited partnership
unit). No  distributions  were declared during the year ended December 31, 2000.
Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations,  the  availability  of cash  reserves  and the  timing  of the  debt
maturity,  refinancing  and/or  sale  of the  property.  The  Registrant's  cash
available  for  distribution  is  reviewed on a monthly  basis.  There can be no
assurance that the Partnership  will generate  sufficient funds from operations,
after required  capital  expenditures,  to permit  distributions to its partners
during 2002 or subsequent periods.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 88,726 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 48.94% of the outstanding Units at
December  31,  2001.  A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will make one or more additional offers to acquire additional limited
partnership  interests in the  Partnership  for cash or in exchange for units in
the operating  partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender
offers. Under the Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders holding a majority of the
Units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of matters,  which
would  include  voting on certain  amendments to the  Partnership  Agreement and
voting to remove the General Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 48.94% of
the outstanding  Units,  AIMCO is in a position to  significantly  influence all
such voting  decisions with respect to the  Registrant.  When voting on matters,
AIMCO would in all likelihood  vote the Units it acquired in a manner  favorable
to the  interest  of the General  Partner  because of its  affiliation  with the
General Partner.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2001, the Financial  Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144,
"Accounting  for the  Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived  Assets".  SFAS No.
144 provides  accounting  guidance for financial  accounting and reporting for
the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.  SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS
No.  121,  "Accounting  for  the  Impairment  of  Long-Lived  Assets  and  for
Long-Lived  Assets to be Disposed  Of".  SFAS No. 144 is effective  for fiscal
years  beginning  after  December  15,  2001.  The  General  Partner  does not
anticipate  that its  adoption  will have a material  effect on the  financial
position or results of operations of the Partnership.

Item 7.     Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI

LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      Report of Ernst & Young, LLP, Independent Auditors

      Consolidated Balance Sheet - December 31, 2001

      Consolidated  Statements of  Operations - Years ended  December 31, 2001
      and 2000

      Consolidated  Statements of Changes in Partners' (Deficit) Capital - Years
      ended December 31, 2001 and 2000

      Consolidated  Statements  of Cash Flows - Years ended  December 31, 2001
      and 2000

      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>


              Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



The Partners
Consolidated Capital Properties VI


We have audited the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet of  Consolidated
Capital  Properties  VI as of December  31, 2001,  and the related  consolidated
statements of operations, changes in partners' (deficit) capital, and cash flows
for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial
statements  are  the  responsibility  of  the  Partnership's   management.   Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion on these financial  statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable  assurance about whether the financial  statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting  the amounts and  disclosures in the financial  statements.  An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made  by the  Partnership's  management,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall
financial  statement  presentation.   We  believe  that  our  audits  provide  a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly, in
all material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial  position of  Consolidated
Capital Properties VI at December 31, 2001, and the consolidated  results of its
operations  and its cash  flows  for each of the two years in the  period  ended
December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting  principles  generally accepted
in the United States.


                                                          /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Greenville, South Carolina
February 15, 2002


<PAGE>



                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                       (in thousands, except unit data)

                                December 31, 2001

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $  240
   Receivables and deposits                                                      55
   Other assets                                                                 120
   Investment property (Notes E and F):
      Land                                                     $ 916
      Buildings and personal property                           9,988
                                                               10,904
      Less accumulated depreciation                            (5,202)        5,702

                                                                            $ 6,117
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                           $ 89
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           63
   Accrued property taxes                                                       122
   Other liabilities                                                             71
   Due to Affiliates (Note B)                                                   140
   Mortgage note payable (Note E)                                             5,336

Partners' (Deficit) Capital
   General partner                                              $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                       (81)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                                379           296

                                                                            $ 6,117

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                     (in thousands, except per unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           Years Ended December 31,
                                                              2001         2000
Revenues:
<S>                                                          <C>          <C>
   Rental income                                             $ 1,602      $ 1,698
   Other income                                                  200          156
   Casualty gain (Note H)                                         43           --
      Total revenues                                           1,845        1,854

Expenses:
   Operating                                                     867          791
   General and administrative                                    192          201
   Depreciation                                                  434          432
   Interest                                                      421          479
   Property taxes                                                102          155
      Total expenses                                           2,016        2,058

Net loss (Note G)                                            $ (171)      $ (204)

Net loss allocated to general partner                         $ --         $ --
Net loss allocated to limited partners                          (171)        (204)
                                                             $ (171)      $ (204)

Net loss per limited partnership unit                        $ (.94)      $ (1.12)

Distribution per limited partnership unit                    $ 2.83        $ --

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                      CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                       (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                 Limited                 Special
                               Partnership    General    Limited    Limited
                                  Units       Partner    Partners   Partners    Total

Original capital
<S>                              <C>            <C>        <C>      <C>        <C>
   contributions                 181,808        $ 1        $ --     $45,452    $45,453

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 1999          181,300       $ (1)      $ (79)    $ 1,285    $ 1,205

Amortization of timing
   difference (Note C)                --           --          9         (9)        --

Net loss for the year ended
   December 31, 2000                  --           --         --       (204)      (204)

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 2000          181,300           (1)       (70)     1,072      1,001

Amortization of timing
   difference (Note C)                --           --          9         (9)        --

Distributions paid to
   partners                           --           (1)       (20)      (513)      (534)

Net loss for the year
   ended December 31, 2001            --           --         --       (171)      (171)

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 2001          181,300       $ (2)      $ (81)     $ 379      $ 296

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              Years Ended December 31,
                                                                   2001         2000
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                               <C>          <C>
  Net loss                                                        $ (171)      $ (204)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                    434          432
     Amortization of loan costs                                        7            6
     Casualty gain                                                   (43)          --
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       (34)         204
      Other assets                                                     4           10
      Accounts payable                                                37           15
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            (19)           3
      Accrued taxes                                                  (26)          28
      Other liabilities                                                5         (153)
      Due to Affiliates                                                1           --

        Net cash provided by operating activities                    195          341

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                            (303)        (252)
  Insurance proceeds received                                         73           --
  Net withdrawals from restricted escrows                             --          135

        Net cash used in investing activities                       (230)        (117)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                 (140)        (114)
  Advances from affiliate                                            158           --
  Payments on advances from affiliate                                (19)          --
  Loan costs paid                                                     --          (35)
  Distributions paid to partners                                    (534)      (2,297)

        Net cash used in financing activities                       (535)      (2,446)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                           (570)      (2,222)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                     810        3,032

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                        $ 240        $ 810

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                          $ 379        $ 509

Distributions to partners of  approximately  $2,297,000 were accrued at December
31, 1999 and paid in January 2000.

        See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                December 31, 2001


Note A - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization:   Consolidated   Capital   Properties  VI,  a  California  limited
partnership (the "Partnership" or "Registrant"),  was formed on May 23, 1984, to
acquire and operate commercial and residential  properties.  The general partner
of the Partnership is ConCap  Equities,  Inc. (the "General  Partner" or "CEI").
The General  Partner is a subsidiary  of  Apartment  Investment  and  Management
Company  ("AIMCO").  The director and officers of the General Partner also serve
as executive  officers of AIMCO.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides that the
Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2015 unless terminated prior to such
date. The Partnership operates one apartment property located in Ohio.

At the  time  of the  Partnership's  formation,  Consolidated  Capital  Equities
Corporation ("CCEC"), a Colorado corporation,  was the corporate general partner
and Consolidated Capital Group II ("CCG"), a California general partnership, was
the non-corporate  general partner.  In 1988,  through a series of transactions,
Southmark  Corporation  ("Southmark")  acquired controlling interest in CCEC. In
December  1988,  CCEC filed for  reorganization  under  Chapter 11 of the United
States  Bankruptcy  Code. In 1990, as part of CCEC's  reorganization  plan,  CEI
acquired  CCEC's general  partner  interests in the  Partnership and in 15 other
affiliated public limited  partnerships (the "Affiliated  Partnerships") and CEI
replaced CCEC as managing general partner in all 16 partnerships.  The selection
of CEI as the sole  managing  general  partner was approved by a majority of the
Limited  Partners in the Partnership and in each of the Affiliated  Partnerships
pursuant to a  solicitation  of the Limited  Partners  dated August 10, 1990. As
part of this  solicitation,  the Limited  Partners also approved an amendment to
the Partnership Agreement to limit changes of control of the Partnership.

Prior to December 1994, all of CEI's  outstanding stock was owned by GII Realty,
Inc.  In  December  1994,  the  parent  of  GII  Realty,  Inc.,  entered  into a
transaction  (the  "Insignia  Transaction")  in which an  affiliate  of Insignia
Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia"),  acquired an option (exercisable in whole or
in part from time to time) to purchase all of the stock of GII Realty, Inc. and,
pursuant to a partial exercise of such option,  acquired 50.5% of that stock. As
part of the Insignia  Transaction,  the Insignia  affiliate also acquired all of
the outstanding stock of Partnership Services,  Inc., an asset management entity
and Insignia acquired all of the outstanding stock of Coventry Properties, Inc.,
a property management entity. In addition, confidentiality, non-competition, and
standstill  arrangements were entered into between certain of the parties. Those
arrangements,   among  other  things,   prohibited  GII  Realty's   former  sole
shareholder  from purchasing  Partnership  Units for a period of three years. On
October 24, 1995, the Insignia affiliate  exercised the remaining portion of its
option to purchase all of the remaining outstanding capital stock of GII Realty,
Inc.

Consolidation:  The Partnership's financial statements include the accounts of
Colony of Springdale Associates,  Ltd., which holds fee title to the Colony of
Springdale  Apartments.  The  results of its  operations  are  included in the
Partnership's   consolidated   financial   statements.   All  interpartnership
transactions have been eliminated.

Uses of Estimates:  The  preparation of financial  statements in conformity with
generally accepted  accounting  principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Investment  Property:  Investment property consists of one apartment complex and
is stated at cost. Acquisition fees are capitalized as a cost of real estate. In
accordance with Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards  ("SFAS") No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of", the Partnership  records impairment losses on long-lived assets
used in operations when events and circumstances  indicate that the assets might
be impaired and the  undiscounted  cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets are less than the carrying  amounts of those  assets.  Costs of apartment
properties  that have  been  permanently  impaired  have  been  written  down to
appraised  value.  No  adjustments  for impairment of value were recorded in the
years ended  December 31, 2001 or 2000. See "Recent  Accounting  Pronouncements"
below.

Depreciation:  Depreciation  is  provided by the  straight-line  method over the
estimated lives of the apartment  property and related  personal  property.  For
Federal income tax purposes,  the  accelerated  cost recovery method is used for
real property over 18 years for additions after March 15, 1984 and before May 9,
1985, and 19 years for additions  after May 8, 1985, and before January 1, 1987.
As a result of the Tax Reform Act of 1986,  for  additions  after  December  31,
1986, the modified  accelerated cost recovery method is used for depreciation of
(1) real property over 27 1/2 years and (2) personal  property  additions over 5
years.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Includes cash on hand and in banks. At certain times,
the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the limit on insured deposits.
Cash  balances  include  approximately  $234,000 at  December  31, 2001 that are
maintained by an affiliated  management company on behalf of affiliated entities
in cash concentration accounts.

Loan Costs:  Net loan costs of  approximately  $108,000  are included in other
assets and are being amortized on a  straight-line  basis over the life of the
loan.

Tenant  Security  Deposits:  The  Partnership  requires  security  deposits from
lessees for the duration of the lease.  Deposits  are  refunded  when the tenant
vacates,  provided  the tenant has not  damaged  its space and is current on its
rental payments.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value
of  Financial  Instruments",  as amended  by SFAS No.  119,  "Disclosures  about
Derivative  Financial  Instruments  and Fair  Value of  Financial  Instruments",
requires  disclosure  of fair value  information  about  financial  instruments,
whether or not recognized in the balance  sheet,  for which it is practicable to
estimate  fair  value.  Fair value is defined in the SFAS as the amount at which
the  instruments  could be exchanged in a current  transaction  between  willing
parties,  other than in a forced or liquidation  sale. The Partnership  believes
that the  carrying  amount of its  financial  instruments  (except for long term
debt)  approximates  their fair value due to the short  term  maturity  of these
instruments.  The  fair  value  of  the  Partnership's  long  term  debt,  after
discounting the scheduled loan payments to maturity,  approximates  its carrying
balance.

Leases: The Partnership  generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms
or less. The Partnership recognizes income as earned on its leases. In addition,
the General Partner's policy is to offer rental concessions during  particularly
slow months or in response to heavy  competition from other similar complexes in
the area. Concessions are charged against rental income as incurred.

Allocation  of  Profits,  Gains and  Losses:  Profits,  gains and  losses of the
Partnership  are allocated  between  general and limited  partners in accordance
with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement.

The Partnership Agreement,  as amended, and as described more fully in "Note C",
provides net income and losses to be allocated to the general  partner,  special
limited partners and limited partners at 0.2%, 3.8% and 96%, respectively. At no
time shall net losses be  allocated  to the  special  limited  partners  if such
allocation  would make the capital balance  negative or make a negative  balance
larger.  In the  event  that a loss  is not  allocated  to the  special  limited
partners,  it is  allocated  to the  limited  partners.  As the  partnership  is
currently  recognizing  net losses and the  special  limited  partners'  capital
balance is negative,  net losses are allocated  0.2% to the general  partner and
99.8% to the limited partners.

Segment Reporting: SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and
Related  Information"  established  standards  for the way that public  business
enterprises  report  information  about operating  segments in annual  financial
statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about
operating segments in interim financial reports.  It also established  standards
for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major
customers.  As defined in SFAS No. 131, the  Partnership has only one reportable
segment.  The General Partner believes that  segment-based  disclosures will not
result  in a  more  meaningful  presentation  than  the  consolidated  financial
statements as currently presented.

Advertising Costs: The Partnership expenses the cost of advertising as incurred.
Advertising costs of approximately  $53,000 in 2001 and approximately $42,000 in
2000 were charged to expense as incurred and are included in operating expenses.

Commitment:  On  September  16,  2000,  the  Partnership  sought the vote of the
limited partners to amend the Partnership Agreement to eliminate the requirement
for the  Partnership  to maintain  reserves  equal to at least 5% of the limited
partners' capital contributions less distributions. The vote was sought pursuant
to a Consent  Solicitation  that  expired on October  16, 2000 at which time the
amendment  was  approved  by  the  requisite  percent  of  limited   partnership
interests.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2001, the Financial  Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144,
"Accounting  for the  Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived  Assets".  SFAS No.
144 provides  accounting  guidance for financial  accounting and reporting for
the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.  SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS
No.  121,  "Accounting  for  the  Impairment  of  Long-Lived  Assets  and  for
Long-Lived  Assets to be Disposed  Of".  SFAS No. 144 is effective  for fiscal
years  beginning  after  December  15,  2001.  The  General  Partner  does not
anticipate  that its  adoption  will have a material  effect on the  financial
position or results of operations of the Partnership.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.  The following expenses were paid or accrued to the General Partner
or affiliates of the General  Partner  during the years ended  December 31, 2001
and 2000.

                                                           2001        2000
                                                            (in thousands)

Property management fees (included in operating            $ 96        $ 92
   expenses)
Reimbursement for services of affiliates (included
   in investment property and operating and general
   and administrative expenses)                             172         106
Partnership management fee (included in other
   liabilities and general and administrative
   expenses)                                                 52          --

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$96,000  and  $92,000  for  the  years  ended   December   31,  2001  and  2000,
respectively.

Affiliates  of  the  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative expenses amounting to approximately $172,000 and $106,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.  Included in these amounts
are fees related to construction management services provided by an affiliate of
the General  Partner of  approximately  $110,000  and $3,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000,  respectively.  The construction  management service
fees are  calculated  based on a  percentage  of current and certain  prior year
additions to investment property and are being depreciated over 15 years.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  from operations made to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administration  management
services.  The General Partner  received  approximately  $52,000 during the year
ended December 31, 2001. The General Partner received  approximately $102,000 in
January  2000,  resulting  from a  distribution  declared  during the year ended
December 31, 1999. No such fee was earned in 2000.

In  accordance  with the  Partnership  Agreement,  an  affiliate  of the General
Partner advanced the Partnership  $158,000 to cover operating expenses at Colony
of  Springdale   Apartments  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2001.  The
Partnership repaid approximately $19,000 of this advance including approximately
$1,000 in accrued interest.  Interest is being charged at the prime rate plus 2%
and  amounted  to  approximately  $2,000.  There were no loans from the  General
Partner or associated interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2000.

Beginning in 2001, the  Partnership  began insuring its properties up to certain
limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally  self-insured for a
portion of losses and  liabilities  related  to workers  compensation,  property
casualty and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the
AIMCO  limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers
unaffiliated with the General Partner.  During the year ended December 31, 2001,
the  Partnership  paid  AIMCO  and  its  affiliates  approximately  $19,000  for
insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 88,726 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 48.94% of the outstanding Units at
December  31,  2001.  A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will make one or more additional offers to acquire additional limited
partnership  interests in the  Partnership  for cash or in exchange for units in
the operating  partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender
offers. Under the Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders holding a majority of the
Units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of matters,  which
would  include  voting on certain  amendments to the  Partnership  Agreement and
voting to remove the General Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 48.94% of
the outstanding  Units,  AIMCO is in a position to  significantly  influence all
such voting  decisions with respect to the  Registrant.  When voting on matters,
AIMCO would in all likelihood  vote the Units it acquired in a manner  favorable
to the  interest  of the General  Partner  because of its  affiliation  with the
General Partner.

Note C - Change in Status of Non-Corporate General Partner

During the year ended December 31, 1991, the  Partnership  Agreement was amended
to convert the  general  partner  interests  held by the  non-corporate  general
partner,  Consolidated  Capital  Group II  ("CCG"),  to that of special  limited
partners ("Special Limited Partners").  The Special Limited Partners do not have
a vote and do not have any of the other rights of a Limited  Partner  except the
right to inspect  the  Partnership's  books and  records;  however,  the Special
Limited Partners  retained the economic  interest in the Partnership  which they
previously owned as a general partner.

ConCap Equities, Inc. ("CEI") became the sole general partner of the Partnership
effective  December 31, 1991. In  connection  with CCG's  conversion,  a special
allocation of gross income was made to the Special Limited  Partners in order to
eliminate their tax basis negative capital accounts.

After the conversion,  the various Special Limited Partners transferred portions
of their  interests to CEI so that CEI now holds a .2% interest in all allocable
items of income,  loss and  distribution.  The  difference  between  the Special
Limited  Partner's  capital  accounts for financial  statement and tax reporting
purposes are being amortized to the Limited  Partners'  capital  accounts as the
components of the timing differences which created the balance reverse.

Note D - Distributions

During the year  ended  December  31,  2001,  a  distribution  of  approximately
$534,000 was declared and paid  (approximately  $513,000 to the limited partners
or $2.83 per limited  partnership  unit) consisting of funds from operations.  A
distribution  of  approximately  $2,297,000  (approximately  $2,250,000  to  the
limited  partners or $12.41 per  limited  partnership  unit) was accrued  during
December 1999 and paid in January 2000. This distribution consisted of cash from
operations of approximately $1,175,000  (approximately $1,128,000 to the limited
partners  or $6.22 per limited  partnership  unit) and  refinancing  proceeds of
approximately  $1,122,000 to the limited partners ($6.19 per limited partnership
unit). No distributions were declared during the year ended December 31, 2000.

Note E - Mortgage Note Payable

The principal terms of the mortgage note payable are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                          Principal    Monthly                           Principal
                         Balance At    Payment     Stated                 Balance
                        December 31,  Including   Interest  Maturity       Due At
       Property             2001       Interest     Rate      Date        Maturity
                             (in thousands)
Colony of Springdale
<S>                        <C>           <C>       <C>       <C>            <C>
  1st mortgage             $5,336        $ 46      7.79%     11/2019        $ --
</TABLE>

The mortgage note payable is non-recourse and secured by pledge of the apartment
property and by pledge of revenues from the apartment  property.  The note has a
prepayment  penalty  requirement  if  repaid  prior to  maturity.  Further,  the
property may not be sold subject to existing indebtedness.

Scheduled principal payments of the mortgage note payable subsequent to December
31, 2001 are as follows (in thousands):

                             2002                $  143
                             2003                   154
                             2004                   167
                             2005                   180
                             2006                   194
                          Thereafter              4,498
                             Total               $5,336

Note F - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

                                               Initial Cost
                                              To Partnership
                                              (in thousands)

                                                     Buildings          Cost
                                                    and Related     Capitalized
                                                      Personal     Subsequent to
      Description         Encumbrance      Land       Property      Acquisition
                         (in thousands)                           (in thousands)
Colony of Springdale
  Springdale, Ohio           $5,336        $ 909       $8,358          $1,637

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                          Gross Amount At Which Carried
                              At December 31, 2001
                                (in thousands)

                                    Buildings
                                   And Related
                                   Personal             Accumulated     Date    Depreciable
      Description         Land     Property    Total    Depreciation  Acquired   Life-Years
                                                       (in thousands)
Colony of Springdale
<S>                      <C>       <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>  <C>     <C>
  Springdale, Ohio       $ 916     $ 9,988    $10,904     $ 5,202      2/20/87      5-30

</TABLE>

Reconciliation of "Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation"

                                                Years Ended December 31,
                                                  2001            2000
                                                     (in thousands)
Investment Properties
Balance at beginning of year                    $10,659          $10,407
  Property improvements                             303              252
  Disposals of property                             (58)              --
Balance at end of year                          $10,904          $10,659

Accumulated Depreciation
Balance at beginning of year                    $ 4,796          $ 4,364
  Additions charged to expense                      434              432
  Disposals of property                             (28)              --
Balance at end of year                          $ 5,202          $ 4,796

The aggregate cost of the investment property for Federal income tax purposes at
December  31,  2001 and  2000,  is  approximately  $10,052,000  and  $9,823,000,
respectively. The accumulated depreciation taken for Federal income tax purposes
at December  31, 2001 and 2000,  is  approximately  $4,987,000  and  $4,550,000,
respectively.

Note G - Income Taxes

Taxable income or loss of the  Partnership is reported in the income tax returns
of its  partners.  Accordingly,  no  provision  for income  taxes is made in the
consolidated financial statements of the Partnership.

The following is a reconciliation  of reported net loss and Federal taxable loss
(in thousands, except per unit data):

                                                     2001          2000
Net loss as reported                                $ (171)       $ (204)
Add (deduct):
   Depreciation differences                             (3)           (5)
   Unearned income                                       2            (2)
   Other                                              (100)         (112)
   Accruals and prepaids                               (12)           41
Federal taxable loss                                $ (284)       $ (282)
Federal taxable loss per limited
   partnership unit                                 $(1.56)       $(1.55)

The following is a reconciliation between the Partnership's reported amounts and
Federal tax basis of net assets and liabilities (in thousands):

Net assets as reported                          $ 296
Land and buildings                                (852)
Accumulated depreciation                           215
Syndication costs                                4,989
Other                                              284

      Net assets - Federal tax basis           $ 4,932

Note H - Casualty Event

During the year ended  December  31,  2001,  a  casualty  gain of  approximately
$43,000 was recognized at the Colony of Springdale Apartments. The casualty gain
was related to a fire,  which  resulted from a lightning  strike in August 2001.
The gain  resulted  from the  receipt of  insurance  proceeds  of  approximately
$73,000,  net of  the  write  off of  undepreciated  property  improvements  and
replacements of approximately $30,000.

Note I - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative  unitholders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General  Partner and affiliated  defendants  intend to oppose the motion and are
scheduled  to file their  opposition  brief on March 26,  2002. A hearing on the
motion has been  scheduled for April 29, 2002.  The Court has set the matter for
trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.


Item 8.     Changes in and  Disagreements  with  Accountants on Accounting and
            Financial Disclosure

            None.


                                    PART III

Item 9.     Directors,  Executive  Officers,  Promoters  and Control  Persons;
            Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Consolidated  Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or the "Registrant") has
no officers or directors. ConCap Equities, Inc. (the "General Partner" or "CEI")
manages and controls the Registrant and has general responsibility and authority
in all matters affecting its business.

The name of the director and executive  officers of the General  Partner,  their
age and the  nature of all  positions  with CEI  presently  held by them are set
forth below. There are no family relationships  between or among any officers or
directors.

Name                        Age    Position

Patrick J. Foye              44    Executive Vice President and Director

Martha L. Long               42    Senior Vice President and Controller

Patrick J. Foye has been  Executive Vice President and Director of the General
Partner  since  October  1,  1998.  Mr.  Foye has  served  as  Executive  Vice
President  of AIMCO  since May 1999.  Prior to joining  AIMCO,  Mr. Foye was a
partner in the law firm of Skadden,  Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP from 1989
to 1998 and was Managing Partner of the firm's  Brussels,  Budapest and Moscow
offices from 1992 through 1994.  Mr. Foye is also Deputy  Chairman of the Long
Island  Power  Authority  and  serves  as a  member  of  the  New  York  State
Privatization  Council.  He received a B.A.  from  Fordham  College and a J.D.
from Fordham University Law School.

Martha L. Long has been  Senior Vice  President  and  Controller  of the General
Partner since October 1998 as a result of the acquisition of Insignia  Financial
Group, Inc. As of February 2001, Ms. Long was also appointed head of the service
business for AIMCO.  From June 1994 until January 1997,  she was the  Controller
for Insignia, and was promoted to Senior Vice President - Finance and Controller
in January 1997,  retaining  that title until  October  1999.  From 1988 to June
1994,  Ms. Long was Senior Vice  President and  Controller for The First Savings
Bank, FSB in Greenville, South Carolina.

One or more of the above persons are also directors and/or officers of a general
partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited  partnerships which
either have a class of  securities  registered  pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of
Section  15(d) of such Act.  Further,  one or more of the above persons are also
directors and/or officers of Apartment Investment and Management Company and the
general  partner  of  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P.,  entities  that  have a class of
securities  registered  pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or are subject to the reporting  requirements of Section 15 (d) of such
Act.

The  executive  officers  and  director  of  the  General  Partner  fulfill  the
obligations  of the Audit  Committee  and  oversee the  Partnership's  financial
reporting  process on behalf of the General Partner.  Management has the primary
responsibility for the financial  statements and the reporting process including
the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight  responsibilities,
the executive  officers and director of the General Partner reviewed the audited
financial  statements with management including a discussion of the quality, not
just the  acceptability,  of the accounting  principles,  the  reasonableness of
significant  judgments,   and  the  clarity  of  disclosures  in  the  financial
statements.

The  executive  officers and director of the General  Partner  reviewed with the
independent  auditors,  who are  responsible  for  expressing  an opinion on the
conformity of those audited  financial  statements  with  accounting  principles
generally accepted in the United States,  their judgments as to the quality, not
just the  acceptability,  of the  Partnership's  accounting  principles and such
other  matters as are required to be discussed  with the Audit  Committee or its
equivalent under auditing standards  generally accepted in the United States. In
addition,  the  Partnership  has  discussed  with the  independent  auditors the
auditors' independence from management and the Partnership including the matters
in the written  disclosures  required by the  Independence  Standards  Board and
considered  the   compatibility   of  non-audit   services  with  the  auditors'
independence.

The executive  officers and director of the General  Partner  discussed with the
Partnership's  independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit.
In  reliance on the reviews and  discussions  referred to above,  the  executive
officers and director of the General  Partner has approved the  inclusion of the
audited financial  statements in the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2001 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The General Partner has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to
audit the financial  statements of the  Partnership for the current fiscal year.
Fees for the last fiscal year were audit services of  approximately  $36,000 and
non-audit services (principally tax-related) of approximately $18,000.

Item 10.    Executive Compensation

Neither  the  director  nor the  officers of the General  Partner  received  any
remuneration from the Registrant.

Item 11.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Except as provided below, as of December 31, 2001, no person was known to CEI to
own of  record  or  beneficially  more  than  five  percent  of the Units of the
Partnership.

Entity                                       Number            Percent
                                            of Units          of Total

Insignia Properties, LP                      42,480            23.43%
   (an affiliate of AIMCO)
AIMCO Properties, LP                         46,246            25.51%
   (an affiliate of AIMCO)

Insignia Properties,  L.P is indirectly  ultimately owned by AIMCO. Its business
address is 55 Beattie Place, Greenville, SC 29602.

AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. is indirectly  ultimately  controlled  by AIMCO.  Its
business address is 2000 South Colorado Boulevard, Denver, Colorado 80222.

No director or officer of the General Partner owns any Units.

As of December  31,  2001,  the  following  persons  were known to CEI to be the
beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of its common stock:

                                         Number of            Percent
     Name and Address                    CEI Shares           Of Total

     Insignia Properties Trust            100,000               100%
     55 Beattie Place
     Greenville, SC  29602

Insignia Properties Trust is an affiliate of AIMCO.

Item 12.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.  The following expenses were paid or accrued to the General Partner
or affiliates of the General  Partner  during the years ended  December 31, 2001
and 2000.

                                                           2001        2000
                                                            (in thousands)

Property management fees                                   $ 96        $ 92
Reimbursement for services of affiliates                    172         106
Partnership management fee                                   52          --

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$96,000  and  $92,000  for  the  years  ended   December   31,  2001  and  2000,
respectively.

Affiliates  of  the  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative expenses amounting to approximately $172,000 and $106,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.  Included in these amounts
are fees related to construction management services provided by an affiliate of
the General  Partner of  approximately  $110,000  and $3,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000,  respectively.  The construction  management service
fees are  calculated  based on a  percentage  of current and certain  prior year
additions to investment property and are being depreciated over 15 years.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  from operations made to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administration  management
services.  The General Partner  received  approximately  $52,000 during the year
ended December 31, 2001. The General Partner received  approximately $102,000 in
January  2000,  resulting  from a  distribution  declared  during the year ended
December 31, 1999. No such fee was earned in 2000.

In  accordance  with the  Partnership  Agreement,  an  affiliate  of the General
Partner advanced the Partnership  $158,000 to cover operating expenses at Colony
of  Springdale   Apartments  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2001.  The
Partnership repaid approximately $19,000 of this advance including approximately
$1,000 in accrued interest.  Interest is being charged at the prime rate plus 2%
and  amounted  to  approximately  $2,000.  There were no loans from the  General
Partner or associated interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2000.

Beginning in 2001, the  Partnership  began insuring its properties up to certain
limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally  self-insured for a
portion of losses and  liabilities  related  to workers  compensation,  property
casualty and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the
AIMCO  limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers
unaffiliated with the General Partner.  During the year ended December 31, 2001,
the  Partnership  paid  AIMCO  and  its  affiliates  approximately  $19,000  for
insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 88,726 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 48.94% of the outstanding Units at
December  31,  2001.  A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will make one or more additional offers to acquire additional limited
partnership  interests in the  Partnership  for cash or in exchange for units in
the operating  partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender
offers. Under the Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders holding a majority of the
Units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of matters,  which
would  include  voting on certain  amendments to the  Partnership  Agreement and
voting to remove the General Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 48.94% of
the outstanding  Units,  AIMCO is in a position to  significantly  influence all
such voting  decisions with respect to the  Registrant.  When voting on matters,
AIMCO would in all likelihood  vote the Units it acquired in a manner  favorable
to the  interest  of the General  Partner  because of its  affiliation  with the
General Partner.

Conversion of Non-Corporate General Partner; Special Allocation

In the year ended  December 31, 1991, the  Partnership  Agreement was amended to
convert the general partner interest held by the non-corporate  general partner,
CCG, to that of a special  limited  partner  ("Special  Limited  Partner").  The
Special  Limited Partner does not have a vote and does not have any of the other
rights of a Limited Partner except the right to inspect the Partnership's  books
and  records;  however,  the Special  Limited  Partner  will retain the economic
interest in the Partnership  which it previously owned as general  partner.  CEI
became the sole general partner of the Partnership  effective as of December 31,
1991. In connection with CCG's conversion,  a special allocation of gross income
was made to the  Special  Limited  Partner in order to  eliminate  its tax basis
negative capital account.

After the  conversion,  the various  owners of interests in the Special  Limited
Partner  transferred  portions of their interests to CEI so that CEI now holds a
..2%  interest  in all  allocable  items of income,  loss and  distribution.  The
difference  between the Special Limited Partners' capital accounts for financial
statement and tax reporting purposes is being amortized to the Limited Partners'
capital  account as the components of the timing  differences  which created the
balance reverse.


Item 13.    Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

      (a)   Exhibits:

            None.

      (b)   Reports on Form 8-K filed during the fourth quarter of 2001:

            None.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance  with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the  Registrant has
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Controller


                                    Date:


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following  persons on behalf of the  Registrant and
in the capacities on the date indicated.


/s/Patrick J. Foye            Executive Vice President      Date:
Patrick J. Foye               and Director


/s/Martha L. Long             Senior Vice President         Date:
Martha L. Long                and Controller



<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit Number    Description of Exhibit

       2.1        Agreement and Plan of Merger,  dated as of October 1, 1998, by
                  and between AIMCO and IPT incorporated by reference to Exhibit
                  2.1 filed  with the  Registrant's  Current  Report on Form 8-K
                  dated October 1, 1998.

       3          Certificate of Limited Partnership as amended to date.

      10.1        Bill of Sale and  Assignment  dated  October 23, 1990,  by and
                  between  CCEC and ConCap  Services  Company  (Incorporated  by
                  reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ended September 30, 1990).

      10.2        Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated October 23, 1990, by
                  and between the CCEC and ConCap Management Limited Partnership
                  ("CCMLP")  (Incorporated  by reference to the Quarterly Report
                  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1990).

      10.3        Property  Management  Agreement No. 119 dated April 9, 1991,
                  by and  between  Colony  Springdale  Associates  and  CCMLP.
                  (Incorporated  by  reference  to the  Annual  Report on Form
                  10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991).

      10.4        Assignment  and  Agreement as to Certain  Property  Management
                  Services  dated April 9, 1991, by and between CCMLP and ConCap
                  Capital  Company.  (Incorporated  by  reference  to the Annual
                  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991).

      10.5        Investor  Services  Agreement  dated  October 23, 1990, by and
                  between the Partnership and  CCEC(Incorporated by reference to
                  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended
                  September 30, 1990).

      10.6        Assignment  and  Assumption   Agreement   (Investor   Services
                  Agreement)  dated  October 23,  1990,  by and between CCEC and
                  ConCap  Services  Company  (Incorporated  by  reference to the
                  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,
                  1990).

      10.7        Letter of Notice dated  December 20,  1991,  from  Partnership
                  Services, Inc. ("PSI") to the Partnership regarding the change
                  in  ownership  and  dissolution  of  ConCap  Services  Company
                  whereby   PSI  assumed  the   Investor   Services   Agreement.
                  (Incorporated  by reference to the Annual  Report on Form 10-K
                  for the year ended December 31, 1991).

      10.8        Financial  Services  Agreement  dated October 23, 1990, by and
                  between the Partnership and CCEC (Incorporated by reference to
                  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended
                  September 30, 1990).

      10.9        Assignment  and  Assumption   Agreement   (Financial  Services
                  Agreement)  dated  October 23,  1990,  by and between CCEC and
                  ConCap  Capital  Company  (Incorporated  by  reference  to the
                  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
                  30, 1990).

      10.10       Letter of Notice  dated  December  20,  1991,  from PSI to the
                  Partnership  regarding the change in ownership and dissolution
                  of ConCap  Capital  Company  whereby PSI assumed the Financial
                  Services  Agreement.  (Incorporated by reference to the Annual
                  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991).

      10.11       Property  Management  Agreement  No. 421 dated May 13, 1993,
                  by and  between the  Partnership  and  Coventry  Properties,
                  Inc.  (Incorporated  by reference to the Quarterly Report on
                  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1993).

      10.12       Assignment and  Assumption  Agreement  (Property  Management
                  Agreement  No.  421)  dated  May 13,  1993,  by and  between
                  Coventry  Properties,  Inc.  and  R&B  Apartment  Management
                  Company, Inc. and Partnership Services,  Inc.  (Incorporated
                  by  reference to the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
                  quarter ended September 30, 1993).

      10.13       Assignment and Agreement as to Certain  Property  Management
                  Services  dated  May  13,  1993,  by  and  between  Coventry
                  Properties,    Inc.   and   Partnership    Services,    Inc.
                  (Incorporated  by reference to the Quarterly  Report on Form
                  10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1993).

      10.14       Property  Management  Agreement  No. 515 dated June 1, 1993,
                  by and  between the  Partnership  and  Coventry  Properties,
                  Inc.

      10.15       Assignment and Agreement as to Certain  Property  Management
                  Services  dated  November 17, 1993, by and between  Coventry
                  Properties, Inc. and Partnership Services, Inc.

      10.16       Stock and Asset Purchase  Agreement,  dated December 8, 1994
                  (the "Gordon Agreement"),  among MAE-ICC,  Inc. ("MAE-ICC"),
                  Gordon  Realty  Inc.  ("Gordon"),  GII  Realty,  Inc.  ("GII
                  Realty"),  and  certain  other  parties.   (Incorporated  by
                  reference to Form 8-K dated December 8, 1994).

      10.17       Exercise  of the Option (as  defined in the Gordon  Agreement)
                  dated   December   8,  1994,   between   MAE-ICC  and  Gordon.
                  (Incorporated  by  reference  to Form 8-K  dated  December  8,
                  1994).

      10.18       Exercise of the remaining portion of the Option (as defined in
                  the Gordon Agreement) dated December 8, 1994,  between MAE-ICC
                  and  Gordon.  (Incorporated  by  reference  to Form 8-K  dated
                  October 24, 1995).

      10.19       Contract to Purchase and Sell  Property  made and entered into
                  as of August 13, 1997, but effective  October 20, 1997, by and
                  between  Consolidated  Capital  Properties  VI,  a  California
                  limited partnership,  and The Vandenburg Organization, a Texas
                  corporation regarding Celina Plaza Apartments.

      10.20       Assignment and assumption of Leases dated October 13, 1997, by
                  and between  Consolidated  Capital Properties VI, a California
                  limited partnership and The Vandenburg  Organization,  a Texas
                  corporation regarding Celina Plaza Apartments.

      10.21       Blanket Conveyance,  Bill of Sale and Assignment dated October
                  13, 1997, by and between Consolidated Capital Properties VI, a
                  California    limited    partnership    and   The   Vandenburg
                  Organization,  a  Texas  corporation  regarding  Celina  Plaza
                  Apartments.

      10.22       Multi-family  note between Colony of Springdale  Associates,
                  Ltd. and GMAC Commercial Mortgage  Corporation dated October
                  25, 1999.  (Incorporated  by reference to the Annual  Report
                  on Form 10-K dated December 31, 1999.)

      16.1        Letter,  dated  August  12,  1992,  from  Ernst & Young to the
                  Securities  and  Exchange   Commission   regarding  change  in
                  certifying accountant.  (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K
                  dated August 6, 1992).

      16.2        Letter  dated  May  9,  1995  from  the  Registrant's   former
                  independent  accountant  regarding  its  concurrence  with the
                  statements  made by the  Registrant  regarding a change in the
                  certifying accountant.  (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K
                  dated May 3, 1995).