alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Synthesis

4-methoxy-a-[[(octylsulfony l)oxy]imino]-Benzeneacetonit rile is synthesized by converting 4-Methoxyphenylacetonitril [CASRN 14271-83-1] with Amylnitrite (115 mol%) under basic conditions to the co rresponding Oxim a -(hydroxyimino)-4- methoxy-Benzeneacetonitrile - [CASRN 76104-14-8]. The reaction is performed

at 20°C in Toluene/iso-Pr opanol/NaOH. The Amylnitrit is dosed continuously over 3 h and the reaction mass is kept for 6 h at 20°C to complete the conversion. After work-up with water the solvent mixture Toluene/iso- Propanol/water is

distilled off. The intermediate is dilu ted with Methylenchloride and Triethylamine is added as scavenger for the HCl formed during the next step. The reaction mass is cooled down to 0°C, Octans ulfonylchloride is added during 90 min and the reaction mass is kept for 1 h to co mplete conversion. After work-up with

water the solvent mixture is distilled off and changed to Ethanol. The Product is crystallized from Ethanol by cooling to -10°C. White crystals are obtained.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of
Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Donald Gee, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Donald Gee

---------------------------

Donald Gee

Chief Executive Officer

February 16, 2006
#### Anne L. SEGEL, Appellant, v. Irving G. SEGEL, Appellee.

No. 73-965.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 16, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of International Wire Group,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 14, 2007                         /s/ RODNEY D. KENT
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Rodney D. Kent
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
258 La. 555

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Emanuel DAVIS, Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51352.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 26, 1971.

In re: Emanuel Davis, Jr. applying for writ of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made is insufficient to justify the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                           85,082
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   360,702
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                     106,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                632,722
<PP&E>                          110,090
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  760,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           501,497
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                        124,981
<OTHER-SE>                       17,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    760,637
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,650,386
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,579,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,179,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               50,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (146,257)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                  (146,257)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0.000
        


</TABLE>
259 La. 897

#### Mrs. Minnie Ruhl WOODS and Mrs. Lorena Ruhl Hillerich v. The SOCIETY FOR the PROPAGATION OF THE FAITH OF the ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS, INC., et al., and Succession of Joseph Louis Ruhl.

No. 51773.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1971.

In re: Mrs. Minnie Ruhl Woods, Louis Hillerich and Carl Hillerich applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany. 251 So.2d 438.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
#### Steven Richard DIEHL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-637.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 31, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal quashed.
Exhibit 99.1

Financial statement scheduleRule 12-09.

Valuation and qualifying accounts.

YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

|                                |  |   |           | Column CAdditions |   |         |  |  
|------------------------------- |  | - | --------- | ------------------ | - | ------- |  | -
|
|
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $ | 1,050,000 |                    | $ | 200,000 |  | $

YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

|                                |  |   |           | Column CAdditions |   |         |  |  
|------------------------------- |  | - | --------- | ------------------ | - | ------- |  | -
|
|
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $ | 1,250,000 |                    | $ | 672,000 |  | $

YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

|                                |  |   |           | Column CAdditions |   |         |  |  
|------------------------------- |  | - | --------- | ------------------ | - | ------- |  | -
|
|
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $ | 1,922,000 |                    | $ | 125,000 |  | $

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 13.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    this annual report on Form 20-F of BT Group plc fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in this annual report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of BT Group plc.
 Date:  May 13, 2009
    /s/ Ian LivingstonName:
    Ian LivingstonTitle:
    Chief ExecutiveDate:  May 13, 2009
    /s/ Tony ChanmugamName:
    Tony ChanmugamTitle:
    Group Finance Director
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated June 11, 1999, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of CT Holdings, Inc. (formerly Citadel Technology, Inc.) as
of February 28, 1999 and for the year then ended, included in the February 29,
2000 Annual Report of CT Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-KSB. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Citadel Technology, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-65189, No. 333-03291, No.
333-15665, No. 333-53151 and No. 333-63051 effective December 20, 1995, May 8,
1996, November 6, 1996, May 20, 1998, and September 8, 1998, respectively) and
Form SB-2, effective November 25, 1998 as amended by Post Effective Amendment
No. 1 effective March 23, 2000.

GRANT THORNTON LLP
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Dallas, Texas
June 9, 2000
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10794 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

LUIS MANUEL LEON QUINONES
,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 320

- 2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Manuel Leon Quinones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores
, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Quinones h a s not filed a r esponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 23, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10794 Document: 00514442100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/23/2018No. 17

- 10794

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to with draw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-10794 Document: 00514442100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/23/2018
[No. 583-1.

Division One—Panel 1.

September 20, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Wesley Robert Johnson, *Appellant.*

*Patrick, Zylstra & Pitt*and *Ted D. Zylstra,*for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

*Edward C. Beeksma, Prosecuting Attorney,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s counsel on appeal has moved for permission to withdraw pursuant to the authority of *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967) because of his belief that the appeal is without merit and frivolous. Following receipt of his counsel’s motion to withdraw and the brief in support thereof, appellant moved for dismissal of counsel.

The granting of probationary status, which is the sole issue on this appeal, rests almost exclusively with the trial judge. *State v. Riddell,*75 Wn.2d 85, 449 P.2d 97 (1968); *State v. Skinner,*3 Wn. App. 367, 475 P.2d 129 (1970). We have examined the record, including appellant’s pro se brief, and have determined that the trial court’s refusal to grant probation was neither arbitrary nor capricious, but was well within the sound exercise of judicial discretion. The appeal is frivolous, appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
251 La. 740

#### Viola C. HOLLAND v. Allen J. ISTRE et al.

No. 49028.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 2, 1968.

In re: Viola C. Holland applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 203 So.2d 754.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
LSP
a:
Page No. 4 &: e@- Inquiries numbered 7, 16, and 17 are not to be asked in respect to infants. Inquirles nombered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are to be aa a 507

ly by an afiirmative mark. as /.
A mere PA
SCHED 1.—Inhabitants in CU ass OLevirra , in the County of _~¢ Lon cer Xs , state

of o- , enumerated by me‘on the _7 ¥_ day of , 1870.

, 104
Post Office: af CL: 7 FCS = , Asst Marshal.

|

~~ _ — - —_ ee

—

, | Pamilfy, numbered in the order

CONSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONS.

,ALUE OF REAL ESTATE
. OWNED. PARENTAGE.

—eE————EE

d

4,

}

&o.)

Whetber deaf
and damb,
blind, insane,

—

| Male Citizens of U.S. of 21

The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

Place of Birth, naming State
or Territory of U. S.: or the |

Profession, Occupation,
or Trade of each person,
male or female.

—

of visitation,
ive months
us, yy
Feh.,

Color.— White (W.), Black

Country, it of foreign birth ar tdtatle:

—

the order of visitation.
Females (F.)

eat Inst birth-day. If
ih

der 1 year,

in fractions,
wouuth (Jun, Feb., &e.)

muuth (Jun,
Attended acho) within the year.

Dwelling-honses, numbered in
(B.), Mulatto (M.), Chi-
nese (C.), Indian (1.)
Valne of Personal Estate.
If born within the year, state
If married within the year, state
21 yeurs of age and u
years of age and upward
whoee right to vote Is
denied or abridged on
otber grounds than re
bellion or other crime

Fatber of foreign birth
Mother of foreign birth.
Male Citizens of U. 8. of

Ag
un
Sex.—Males (M.),
Value of Rea) Estate.
Cannot reud.
Cannot write.

~~
=

|
wards.

~)
| ow
iw
i
ath
=
=H
wl
i)
—)

|
|

}

—==—a

|
|
|

I

.
‘
7

§
|
|

Q’

7 4
;

>

4

lle
gor 2 tag
Jy Barn hapacg Herel,
aot, MS

: CLM Lf (je UO |
LA
A -
el. 5(\Flew| Morve. He ;

LAA (Se WEE sy aut News Bae ie io in

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

x F ST
Gtk a SUA |e Varn _|
22 cd | Nees [> | | |
(ad OFect he, 211 |e) WerrKees. pe | S]f 0.)
No. of dwellings, Y Oe white females, / {Gis No. of ot a born, f 0 | No. of insane,
: 4
“« « families, bs es “  eolored males, /  “ “‘ females, “

“ “white males, “25 “ “ “ females, / “ “ blind,

ed

—-- —- ——_
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 34837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR18-66-000.
    Applicants: Alpine High Pipeline LP.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b), (e)+(g): Notice of Name 
Change and Revision to Statement of Operating Conditions to be 
effective 7/2/2018.
    Filed Date: 7/16/18.
    Accession Number: 201807165056.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/6/18.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-979-000.
    Applicants: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing Tariff Waiver--ROFR Posting.
    Filed Date: 7/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180716-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/30/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered, 
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 17, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15705 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-01-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           17,965
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     1,865
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 21,227
<CASH>                                         445
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             6,143
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         1,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 37,929
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                22,734
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            2,606
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          1,751
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    150
<COMMON>                                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   37,929
<PREMIUMS>                                     1,738
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            290
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             35
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 107
<BENEFITS>                                     1,361
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    471
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120
<INCOME-TAX>                                   16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            104
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   104
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1097 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1097

To prohibit a Federal agency from establishing or implementing a policy 
  that discourages or prohibits the selection of a resort or vacation 
 destination as the location for a conference or event, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2013

  Mr. Heller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit a Federal agency from establishing or implementing a policy 
  that discourages or prohibits the selection of a resort or vacation 
 destination as the location for a conference or event, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect America's Cities from 
Government Blacklist Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CERTAIN TRAVEL AND CONFERENCES POLICIES OF 
              AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES.

    An agency of the Government of the United States may not establish 
or implement a policy that discourages or prohibits the selection of a 
location for travel, an event, a meeting, or a conference because the 
location is perceived to be a resort or vacation destination.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 12.1

Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

|                                         |  | Years Ended June 30,
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|
|Interest component of rents              |  | $                   
|Amortization of deferred financing costs |  |                     
|Interest expense                         |  |                     
|                                         |  |                     
|Fixed charges                            |  |                     
|Earnings before income taxes             |  |                     
|                                         |  |                     
|Earnings before fixed charges            |  | $                   
|                                         |  |                     
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       |  |                     

QuickLinks
251 La. 737

#### Dan A. RITCHEY et al. v. James H. DESSER et al.

No. 49024.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 2, 1968.

In re: James H. Desser and George E. Desser applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 203 So.2d 735.

The application is denied. Since the Court of Appeal has found that plaintiffs have made out the necessary prima facie case for the issuance of a preliminary injunction; reversed the judgment of the trial court; and remanded the case for further proceedings; the matter is not final, as the question of the issuance of a permanent injunction is still pending before the trial court. The rights of all parties are reserved.