II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1173 

To affirm the authority of the President to require independent regulatory 

agencies to comply with regulatory analysis requirements applicable to 

executive agencies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2013 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. WARNER, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To affirm the authority of the President to require independent regulatory agencies to comply with regulatory 

analysis requirements applicable to executive agencies, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Independent Agency 

5 Regulatory Analysis Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1173 IS

1 (1) the term ‘‘Administrator’’ means the Ad2 ministrator of the Office of Information and Regu3 latory Affairs; 

4 (2) the term ‘‘agency’’ has the same meaning as 

5 in section 3502(1) of title 44, United States Code; 

6 (3) the term ‘‘economically significant rule’’ 

7 means any rule that the Administrator determines is 

8 likely to— 

9 (A) have an annual effect on the economy 

10 of $100,000,000 or more; or 

11 (B) adversely affect in a material way the 

12 economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, 

13 competition, jobs, the environment, public 

14 health or safety, or State, local, or tribal gov15 ernments or communities; 

16 (4) the term ‘‘independent regulatory agency’’ 

17 has the same meaning as in section 3502(5) of title 

18 44, United States Code; and 

19 (5) the term ‘‘rule’’— 

20 (A) means a rule, as that term is defined 

21 in section 551 of title 5, United States Code; 

22 and 

23 (B) does not include a rule of the Board 

24 of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1173 IS

1 the Federal Open Market Committee relating to 

2 monetary policy. 

3 SEC. 3. REGULATORY ANALYSIS BY INDEPENDENT AGEN4 CIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President may by Executive 

6 order require an independent regulatory agency to comply, 

7 to the extent permitted by law, with regulatory analysis 

8 requirements applicable to other agencies, including the 

9 requirements to— 

10 (1) identify the problem that the agency intends 

11 to address by a new rule (including, where applica12 ble, the failures of private markets or public institu13 tions that warrant new agency action) and assess 

14 the significance of that problem; 

15 (2) examine whether any existing rule (or other 

16 law) has created, or contributed to, the problem that 

17 a new rule is intended to correct and whether the ex18 isting rule (or other law) should be modified to 

19 achieve the intended goal of the new rule more effec20 tively; 

21 (3) identify and assess available alternatives to 

22 direct regulation, including providing economic in23 centives to encourage the desired behavior, or pro24 viding information upon which choices can be made 

25 by the public; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 1173 IS

1 (4) consider to the extent reasonable in setting 

2 regulatory priorities, the degree and nature of the 

3 risks posed by various substances or activities within 

4 its jurisdiction; 

5 (5) design its rules in the most cost-effective 

6 manner to achieve the regulatory objective and, in 

7 doing so, consider incentives for innovation, consist8 ency, predictability, the costs of enforcement and 

9 compliance (to the Federal Government, regulated 

10 entities, and the public), flexibility, distributive im11 pacts, and equity; 

12 (6) assess the costs and the benefits of the in13 tended rule and, recognizing some costs and benefits 

14 are difficult to quantify, propose or adopt a rule only 

15 upon a reasoned determination that the benefits of 

16 the rule justify its costs; 

17 (7) base its rulemaking decisions on the best 

18 reasonably obtainable scientific, technical, economic, 

19 and other information concerning the need for, and 

20 consequences of, the intended rule; 

21 (8) identify and assess alternative forms of reg22 ulation and, to the extent feasible, specify perform23 ance objectives, rather than specifying the behavior 

24 or manner of compliance that regulated entities 

25 must adopt; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
5 

•S 1173 IS

1 (9) seek the views of appropriate State, local, 

2 and tribal officials before imposing regulatory re3 quirements that might significantly or uniquely af4 fect State, local, or tribal governmental entities, 

5 whenever feasible; 

6 (10) avoid rules that are inconsistent or incom7 patible with, or duplicative of, other rules of the 

8 independent regulatory agency or other agencies; 

9 (11) tailor rules to impose the least burden on 

10 society, including individuals, businesses of differing 

11 sizes, and other entities (including small commu12 nities and governmental entities), consistent with 

13 achieving the regulatory objectives, and taking into 

14 account, among other factors, and to the extent 

15 practicable, the cost of cumulative rules; 

16 (12) draft each rule to be simple and easy to 

17 understand, with the goal of minimizing the poten18 tial for uncertainty and litigation arising from un19 certainty; and 

20 (13) periodically review its existing economically 

21 significant rules to determine whether any such rules 

22 should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or re23 pealed so as to make the agency’s regulatory pro24 gram more effective or less burdensome in achieving 

25 the regulatory objectives. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
6 

•S 1173 IS

1 (b) ECONOMICALLY SIGNIFICANT RULES.—For any 

2 proposed or final rule identified by an independent regu3 latory agency as, or determined by the Administrator to 

4 be, an economically significant rule, the President may by 

5 Executive order require the independent regulatory agency 

6 to provide to the Administrator and publish with the pro7 posed and final rule the following information, to the ex8 tent permitted by law: 

9 (1) An assessment, including the underlying 

10 analysis, of benefits anticipated from the rule to11 gether with, to the extent feasible, a quantification 

12 of those benefits. 

13 (2) An assessment, including the underlying 

14 analysis, of costs anticipated from the rule together 

15 with, to the extent feasible, a quantification of those 

16 costs. 

17 (3) An assessment, including the underlying 

18 analysis, of costs and benefits of potentially effective 

19 and reasonably feasible alternatives to the rule, iden20 tified by the agencies or the public, including im21 proving existing regulations and reasonably viable 

22 nonregulatory actions, and an explanation why the 

23 planned regulatory action is preferable to the identi24 fied potential alternatives. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
7 

•S 1173 IS

1 (c) REVIEW BY OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND REGU2 LATORY AFFAIRS.— 

3 (1) REQUIREMENT TO SEEK REVIEW.—The 

4 President may, by Executive order, require an inde5 pendent regulatory agency to submit to the Adminis6 trator for review— 

7 (A) any proposed economically significant 

8 rule, either prior to publication of the notice of 

9 proposed rulemaking or, if the head of the inde10 pendent regulatory agency elects, during the 

11 general public comment period; and 

12 (B) any final economically significant rule, 

13 prior to publication of the final rule. 

14 (2) NONBINDING ASSESSMENT.—An Executive 

15 order issued under this Act may require that, not 

16 later than 90 days after the independent regulatory 

17 agency submits a proposed or final economically sig18 nificant rule for review, the Administrator submit 

19 for inclusion in the rulemaking record the Adminis20 trator’s assessment of the extent to which the agen21 cy has complied with any of the regulatory analysis 

22 requirements made applicable by Executive order. 

23 (3) DETERMINATION AND EXPLANATION BY

24 INDEPENDENT AGENCY.—An Executive order issued 

25 under this Act may require that, if the AdminisVerDate Mar 15 2010 20:56 Jun 21, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1173.IS S1173

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
8 

•S 1173 IS

1 trator concludes under paragraph (2) that the inde2 pendent regulatory agency did not comply with one 

3 or more requirements of the Executive order with re4 spect to a proposed or final economically significant 

5 rule, the head of the agency that issued the economi6 cally significant rule shall include with the final 

7 rule— 

8 (A) a determination that the rule complies 

9 with the specified requirement or requirements 

10 and an explanation of that determination; and 

11 (B) if applicable, an explanation why the 

12 independent regulatory agency did not comply 

13 with one or more of the specified requirements, 

14 based on the statutory provision authorizing the 

15 rule. 

16 SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON JUDICIAL REVIEW. 

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—The compliance or noncompliance 

18 of an independent regulatory agency with the require19 ments of an Executive order issued under this Act shall 

20 not be subject to judicial review. 

21 (b) AGENCY RECORD.—When an action for judicial 

22 review of a rule promulgated by an independent regulatory 

23 agency is instituted, any determination, analysis, or expla24 nation produced by the agency, and any assessment pro25 duced by the Administrator, pursuant to an Executive 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
9 

•S 1173 IS

1 order issued under this Act, shall constitute part of the 

2 whole record of agency action in connection with the re3 view. 

4 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec5 tion shall be construed to bar judicial review of any other 

6 impact statement or similar analysis required by any other 

7 provision of law if judicial review of such statement or 

8 analysis is otherwise permitted by law. 

9 SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

10 Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit the 

11 authority of the President with respect to independent reg12 ulatory agencies under any other applicable law. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS