alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  State or other jurisdiction of
Name of Subsidiary                                incorporation or organization
------------------                                ------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>

PictureTel Securities Corporation                 Massachusetts

PictureTel International Corporation              Delaware

PictureTel Technology Corporation                 Delaware

PictureTel Service Corporation                    Delaware

PicTel Videoconferencing Systems Corporation      Delaware 

PictureTel Australia Pty. Ltd.                    Australia

PictureTel International Ltda.                    Brazil

PictureTel International BV (Netherlands)         Netherlands

PictureTel GmbH                                   Germany

PictureTel Italy S.r.l.                           Italy

PictureTel Company, Ltd.                          Japan

PictureTel Mexico S.A. de C.V.                    Mexico

PictureTel Service Ltd. Pte.                      Singapore

PictureTel Scandinavia AB                         Sweden

PictureTel (Schweiz) AG                           Switzerland

PictureTel UK Limited                             United Kingdom

PictureTel FSC, Ltd.                              United States Virgin Islands

PictureTel Venezuela SA                           Venezuela

MultiLink, Inc.                                   Massachusetts

MultiLink Europe Ltd.                             United Kingdom

MultiLink UK Limited                              United Kingdom

Starlight Networks, Inc.                          California

</TABLE>

         All the subsidiaries are wholly owned (except for directors' qualifying
shares in certain countries), either directly or indirectly, by the company and
may do business under their own name as well as the name PictureTel Corporation.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1929

TERRY HOUSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, 

COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFSCME LOCAL 2250,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02507-GJH)

Submitted: April 27, 2018 Decided: June 6, 2018

Before WILKINSON, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

C. Sukari Hardnett, HARDNETT & ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring, Maryland, for 

Appellant. Mark J. Murphy, MOONEY, GREEN, SAINDON, MURPHY & WELCH, 

P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Houston appeals from the district court’s final judgment entered in her

action asserting claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 

U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017); the Age Discrimination in 

Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2017); and the 

Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2012), against the 

Executive Board of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, 

Local 250. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Houston v. Exec. Bd. of the Am. 

Fed’n of State, County & Mun. Emps., AFSCME Local 2250, No. 8:15-cv-02507-GJH

(D. Md. filed Dec. 7, 2016 & entered Dec. 8, 2016; July 10, 2017). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Thomas W. VICKERS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF REGENTS, Appellee.

No. 73-148.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 19, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Richard Connelly, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CT Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;


4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:


a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;


b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and


5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):


a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.




Date: April 14, 2004

/s/ RICHARD CONNELLY
--------------------
Richard Connelly, Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial Officer


<PAGE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1299 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 

vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 16 (legislative day, JULY 15), 2013 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself and Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to 

the operation of vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WIS4 CONSIN HIGHWAYS. 

5 Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(j) OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WIS8 CONSIN HIGHWAYS.—If any segment of the United States 

9 Route 41 corridor, as described in section 1105(c)(57) of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1299 IS

1 the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 

2 1991 (105 Stat. 2032; 119 Stat. 1211) is designated as 

3 a route on the Interstate System, a vehicle that could op4 erate legally on that segment before the date of that des5 ignation may continue to operate on that segment, without 

6 regard to any requirement under subsection (a).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Gail M. BAPTISTE, Diane Shields, Annie Brown, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of her Minor Child, Amerales Brown, and Julia Green v. Daniel WASHINGTON and New Orleans Public Service, Inc.

No. 62530.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: New Orleans Public Service, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans (9052-9055). 359 So.2d 1122.

Writ denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.3

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001
                                                       ------------------------------------------------------
                                                           NUMBER             PERCENT            EQUIVALENT
                                                         OF SHARES          OUTSTANDING            SHARES
                                                       --------------      --------------      --------------
<S>                                                    <C>                 <C>                <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                     2,300,000              100.00%          2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                  2,508,997              100.00%          2,508,997
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock               15,310,943              100.00%         15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                             11,242,857              100.00%         11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                              4,323,874              100.00%          4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                               6,000,000              100.00%          6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                             (6,588)             100.00%             (6,588)
   March 2000 Debt Swap                                     3,789,715              100.00%          3,789,715
   Canadian Transaction                                       714,286              100.00%            714,286
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                 190,651              100.00%            190,651
   Warrants Exercised                                         134,737              100.00%            134,737
                                                       --------------                          --------------
                                                           46,509,472                              46,509,472

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                46,509,472

NET LOSS                                                                                       $  (33,575,000)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                             $        (0.72)
                                                                                               ==============
</Table>
#### William Roy LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-899.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 20, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1(B)****Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**     I, Neal B. Soderquist, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe registration, and we have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based onsuch evaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 16, 2006.   /s/ Neal B. Soderquist   Neal B. Soderquist, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                     List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant


American Journal Inc., a New York corporation.

Camelot Entertainment Sales, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

Four Crowns Inc., a Delaware corporation

Inside Edition Inc., a New York corporation.

K.W.M., Inc., a Delaware corporation.

King World Corporation, a Delaware corporation

King World Direct Inc., a Delaware corporation

King World FSC Corporation, a Virgin Islands corporation.

King World/RWS Inc., a New York corporation

King World/LBS Inc., a New York corporation

King World Merchandising, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

Quickstead Inc., a California corporation.

Topper Productions Inc., a California corporation
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 385

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit consideration

of any measure proposing a balanced-budget constitutional amendment

until the Congressional Budget Office certifies that the Federal budget

has been in balance for the two most recently completed fiscal years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1994

Ms. MARGOLIES-MEZVINSKY submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

prohibit consideration of any measure proposing a balanced-budget constitutional amendment until the Congressional Budget Office certifies that the Federal budget

has been in balance for the two most recently completed

fiscal years.

1 Resolved, That rule XXII of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the

3 following new clause:

4 ‘‘7. It shall not be in order in the House to consider

5 any measure proposing a constitutional amendment to bal6 ance the Federal budget until the Director of the Congres-
2

•HRES 385 IH

1 sional Budget Office certifies, in writing, to the House

2 that the Federal budget has been in balance for the two

3 most recently completed fiscal years before the consider4 ation of that measure.’’.

Æ
#### Helen Ann CLAUSEN, Appellant, v. Victor CLAUSEN, Appellee.

No. 71-404.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 1, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | 1.                The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |  Date:      November                  13,                  2007    |   |
|   |   | /s/ /s/                Frederic W.J. Birner                                                                     |   |
|   |   | Name:                     Frederic W.J. Birner                                              |   |
|   |   | Title:                      Chief Executive Officer                                    |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                 |   |

|   |        |                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|   |   | /s/ Dennis                  N. Genty                                                                                                                                               |   |
|   |   | Name:       Dennis                    N. GentyTitle:         Chief                    Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |

----

----
# Official Journal L 340/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 340 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6530 December 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 340

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6530 December 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2583 of 19 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2278 suspending the Common Customs Tariff duties referred to in Article 56(2), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 on certain agricultural and industrial products | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2583 of 19 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2278 suspending the Common Customs Tariff duties referred to in Article 56(2), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 on certain agricultural and industrial products

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
252 La. 104

#### SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION v. Starling SIMON and Ursule Abshlre Simon.

No. 49170.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1968.

In re: Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corporation applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vermilion. 207 So.2d 561; 207 So.2d 546.

The application is denied. The judgment complained of is not final.