alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Inhabitants of the Town of Memphis, Appellants, *vs.*John O’Connor, Respondent.

i. *Ordinances*— Fines, *suits for*— Particularity *of statements.*— In proceedings to recover a fine for violation, of a town or city ordinance, it is sufficient if the statements inform the defendant with reasonable certainty of what he is called upon to answer. The technical accuracy of an indictment is not required.

2. *Ordinances of towns*— Fines, *suits for*— Statements *therein.*— A suit to recover afine for breach of an ordinance of a town organized under W. S., Ch. 124, is a civil action. A complaint on such a cause of action, whose only charge is, “that the defendant committed a certain offense contrary to an ordinance of the town,” is bad, and the suit must be dismissed upon motion.

*469
      *Appeal from Scotland Circuit Court.*

*Nat. M.*Cwynne, for Appellants.

I. Technicalities should not be regarded in pleadings before courts of limited jurisdiction.

It was the duty of the Circuit Court to proceed to hear, try and determine this cause upon the merits.

*Keys 8?*Knott, for Respondent.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

. The defendant was prosecuted, convicted and assessed to pay a fine in a proceeding before the town authorities for an alleged violation of an ordinance. '

He appealed to the Circuit Court, where upon his motion the case was dismissed, and the plaintiff has brought the cause here.

The main question is, whether the complaint filed, and upon which defendant was tried, was so palpably insufficient as to j ustify the court in dismissing the case.

The only charge contained in the complaint was, that the defendant committed a certain offense contrary to an ordinance of the town. It is the well .established doctrine in this State, that in proceedings to recover a fine for the violation of a town or city ordinance, it is not necessary for the statement to be as technical as an indictment. It is sufficient if it informs the defendant with reasonable- certainty of what he is called upon to answer. (St. Louis vs. Smith, 10 Mo., 438.)

But tested by this rule, the complaint is not good. It refers to no particular ordinance; does not state what the penalty is for the supposed offense, nor does it allege such attendant circumstances as to advise- the defendant of the cause of action.

The statute, which governs this proceeding, (W. S., (3rd Ed.) 1318, § 16) declares, that all fines and penalties accruing to any town, organized under the provisions of the statute, may be recovered by a civil action. But the complaint here would not be a good statement in any civil action, and there*470fore it cannot be permitted as a basis to uphold or sustain the proceedings. Nor do we think the court erred in refusing the application for an amendment. The amendment changed the character of the ease, and was not allowable.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

The other Judges concur, except Judge Sherwood, who is absent.
TRUSTEE RESIGNATION

TO:   Nordstrom Credit, Inc.

  In connection with the appointment of Norwest Bank Colorado, National 
Association as successor trustee under the indenture (defined below), 
Wells Fargo Bank (Colorado), N.A. (the "Resigning Trustee"), hereby 
resigns as trustee under that certain indenture by and between the 
Company and the Resigning Trustee dated as of November 15, 1984 as 
supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 15, 
1988, the Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 1989 and the 
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 19, 1990 (as 
supplemented, the "Indenture"), providing for the issuance from time to 
time of unsecured debentures, notes or other evidences of indebtedness 
of the Company (the "Securities") to be issued in one or more series 
under such Indenture.  The Resigning Trustee acknowledges that 
$311,000,000.00 aggregate principal amount of debt securities are 
outstanding under the Indenture.

  The resignation is provided pursuant to Section 610(b) of the 
Indenture, and shall be applicable with respect to all series of 
Securities heretofore issued under the Indenture.

DATED:  March 20, 1997

WELLS FARGO BANK
(COLORADO), N.A.


BY /s/  Richard J. Sullivan
        ------------------------
        Richard J. Sullivan, III
        Vice President
EXHIBIT 99.1



Below each General Partner's name is a list of the limited  partnerships,  other
than the  Registrant,  for which the General Partner serves as a general partner
and the companies for which the General  Partner serves as a director.  The list
includes only those  limited  partnerships  and companies  which have a class of
securities  registered  pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 or are subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Act.

John J. Nooney

  Limited Partnerships:

   Nooney Real Property Investors-Two, L.P.     Nooney Income Fund Ltd., L.P.

  Companies:

   None

                                       21
# C_2021422EN.01000501.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 15 July 2021 — easyJet Airline Company Ltd. v HG

(Case C-435/21)

(2021/C 422/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: easyJet Airline Company Ltd.

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: HG

The case was removed from the register of the Court of Justice by order of the President of the Court of 10 August 2021.

---
#### Bernard B. WORKMAN, Appellant, v. DAVIDSON DRUGS, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-11.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 10, 1973.

David A. Maney, Rood & Hapner, Tampa, for appellant.

Patrick H. Dickinson of Dart, Dickinson, O’Riorden, Gibbons & Quale, Sarasota, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

McNULTY, j., dissents.
#### Joseph A. NOLL, Jr., Appellant, v. Dianne L. NOLL, Appellee.

No. 70-413.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 19, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 02, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 02, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0842. AMANDA DESHEA WYNN v. SUMMIT MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C. et 

al.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

January 25, 2013

t0122

Order 

January 25, 2013

145694

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145694

COA: 309286 

Grand Traverse CC: 11-004419-FH

GARY MARK TREMAIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### ALLEN TROVILLION, INC. and Hardware Mutual Casualty Company, Petitioners, v. Everett C. STAMPER, and Florida Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 42748.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Paul E. Martin, the Principal Financial Officer of Enstar Income
Program II-2, L.P. (the Partnership) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that, the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership. /s/  Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinPrincipal Financial OfficerApril 14, 2004
# C_2022148EN.01004803.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/48

---

Order of the General Court of 8 February 2022 — Hoteles Olivencia v EUIPO — Corporacion H10 Hotels (HOTELES HO)

(Case T-707/21) (1)

(2022/C 148/67)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 17.1.2022.

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: July 25, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[reg] hereby 
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 
19, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request 
to Add Priority Mail Contract 454 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-195, CP2018-
273.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-15844 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Barbara Ann BARR v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the Louisiana DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS.

No. 61617.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 17, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana thru La. Department of Highways, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Jackson. 355 So.2d 52.

Denied.
#### Russell U. SNEDEKER, Appellant, v. Juanita Clark SNEDEKER and Cavalier Insurance Corporation, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 72-928.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 29, 1974.

Robert J. Carroll of Muscarella, Pere-nich & Carroll, P. A., Clearwater, for appellant.

David G. Hanlon of Shackleford, Far-rior, Stallings & Evans, P. A., Tampa, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Bencomo v. Bencomo, Fla.1967, 200 So.2d 171, and Papy v. Frischkorn, Fla.App.3rd, 1970, 234 So.2d 718.

McNULTY, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
#### Mrs. Elizabeth Ann Daigrepont BURMASTER etc. v. GRAVITY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 2 OF the PARISH OF ST. CHARLES et al.

No. 62792.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1978.

In re: Fromherz Engineers, Inc., applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of St. Charles.

Writ granted and consolidated with Appeal No. 62809.

DENNIS, J.,

concurs but is of the opinion that this court does not have appellate jurisdiction in No. 62809 because there is not a final judgment in the case.'

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered ease having been duly considered, it is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable William Bradley Judge of the 29th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of St. Charles, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 6th day of October, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained. It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this court, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
Page No. yA |

_ Low Oe IAG
SCHEDULE 1—Free Inhabitants in ve ee ae f}
of acne enumerated by me, on the aie day of als 1960. __ 4 Z2z2Z-__Ase't Marshal. |
Post Office Goi Pe acheo

~~“

i
:

a TTT LL LT

» year. Ew

\4 = zs Descuirrion. . . at Vatoe or Estate Owwzp. Z| : : | i :
= 3 ih | - = a ;
p58 - " _ The name of every person whose usual Profession, Occupation, or Trade of | | Place of Birth, z js = | Paipearyeaizg
SEs es place of abode on the first day of June, each person, male and female, over Value of - Walue of Naming the State, Territory, Peal be ‘dae. tinue ab
=D. rs g 1860, was in this family. 15 years of age. | Real Estate. Personal or Country. | = g : paupe
a oe Estate. ' Ze] 28 | convict.
s zt 25 > | 2 Es
Ae? | em | a a je les|
’ to ar ce ce | — —— es eae
| ‘ee @., g 10 it 12 13 14 :
= - =<—===.

i |
}

a e

gic: aE
pel te bo aeenk [3 Pl aera 32 NG)

i ey eee

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau. 7 2s

CA Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.
Exhibit 23



             Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

 We have issued our  report dated August 17,  2001, except for  Note E as  to
 which  the  date  is  September  26,  2001  and  for Note B as to which  the
 date is August 6, 2002, accompanying  the consolidated financial  statements
 included in the  Annual Report of uniView  Technologies Corporation on  Form
 10-K/A  for the  year  ended  June 30,  2001.   We  hereby  consent  to  the
 incorporation  by reference of  said  report in the  following  Registration
 Statements of uniView Technologies Corporation:

 Form S-3 (File No. 333-62680 effective July 13, 2001);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-47692 effective October 25, 2000);
 Form S-8 (File No. 333-39358 effective June 15, 2000);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-37474 effective June 1, 2000);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-31952 effective March 21, 2000);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-81693 effective July 8, 1999);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-68985 effective December 22, 1998);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-59401 effective September 2, 1998);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-52515 effective May 29, 1998);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-41061 effective February 19, 1998);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-33835 effective October 8, 1997);
 Form S-2 (File No. 333-06447 effective September 30, 1996);
 Form S-3 (File No. 33-95516 effective April 5, 1996).


 /s/  Grant Thornton LLP


 Grant Thornton LLP

 Dallas, Texas
 August 6, 2002
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jimmie D. KENNEDY.

No. 53560.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1973.

In re: Jimmie D. Kennedy applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and for stay order.

This application is moot. On May 14, 1973 a mistrial was ordered in case #36,486 and a continuance ordered in case #35,963.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 11.1

                             PAGEMART WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
                                                                  ------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      NUMBER             PERCENT             EQUIVALENT
                                                                    OF SHARES          OUTSTANDING             SHARES
<S>                                                               <C>                  <C>                 <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                              2,300,000               100.00%           2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                           1,074,725               100.00%           1,074,725
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                        15,310,943               100.00%          15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                                      11,242,857               100.00%          11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                                       4,323,874               100.00%           4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                                        6,000,000               100.00%           6,000,000
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                          127,399                87.23%             111,124
   Warrants Exercised                                                   49,450               100.00%              49,450
                                                                  ------------                              ------------
                                                                    40,429,248                                40,412,973

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                           40,412,973

NET LOSS                                                                                                     (25,348,032)


NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                                          $      (0.63)
                                                                                                            ============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.6

CONSENT OF EXPERT

I, Rick Sims, hereby
consent to the use of my name in connection with the references to scientific and technical information relating to mineral properties of Barrick Gold Corporation (the Company) in the Annual Information Form for the year ended
December 31, 2016 (the AIF) and the related Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company.

I do also
hereby consent to the use of my name and the incorporation by reference of the information contained in the AIF and Annual Report on Form 40-F into the Registration Statements of the Company on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-121500, 333-131715, 333-135769), Form
F-3 (File No. 333-206417) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-216099).

Yours very truly,



|              |  |                                        
|------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|/s/ Rick Sims
|Name:         |  | Rick Sims                              
|Title:        |  | Senior Director, Resources and Reserves
|Dated:        |  | March 24, 2017
rue SF
renur Oat No 0

Enumeration Dt No,

SCHEDULE L—Tnhabitants in. Pati. . Be State of. Lezaree
. enumerdted by me on the as day of June, 1880.
Lathe brie

Lav 494 Gray wae iy ae
TE en te Waa
A

Ba : ime 7
| Fane OW F: 5 TTT Bomenteu Cone Baw) *
[Dae ned tale TLDs Bonne :

—7—— Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

and Lrelland*

944, Visit http://www.archives.qov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

— Sante 0 W\¢ 24\  deaghli, . :  Conmeaticuts Ne Me, on
Date Mleoe....\w & ge)  Semrand. - _ - Sanglard. Lagland, pd,"
_ weed Sar : is Co ope
| Yehrcy. Mary, 9 7 38) Starch : N\ Letand, Leelend Leeland”
easel], Jatin Bd, wan - 7 - — Mernagtivh an, Gori}
ey. KL. M Ve.
— Samos L, Wim. 4 dom ' , nerd ~~ Conmecheal am ee
— Florence F 4 tog ble, ai - Connechech Conn YL...
) = Way hun Cleat. _€e 2 2
2am al |" ca eed tags Fat] Samet. i Some tre raeost Jo _
Zam Lee lene  Qars3 10) ford, Muy WV F 7d — Z Manel Seaan
foie tes ORNL dun pean ant
a All LNG |e” = ee ee i [| fj Caasctent| B22, | Saodann
Mpa fon Day 27 & oe SLED | ety Baal ss AY Spel ean Lian”
alerssgvd 0 |: | et i =i LN Deascachuse Z (aon
foe Wir ve) Aegprng henge | ji 1) \Qenccttcah | Comm | Con,
Ge on rts sh | abedeedare Le Gpeatent Camm | Corn

Crevran, Bnd, $i, Soret ome vy Lefer e?.| Leeland Lago”
"02 parr Cathars, E23 2

| Dees” ats cr aaege pee EN

11333 S03] Chimes, Ranue7 LW tn 4p "
Ts OheraL Wf 3\

— wee

Jn lara L WES, a i ar. teye| L Nesp So

Aa — Z i Zoran | Geen

fe. re E " me

Tt brn Mit hme?
Cea Las al * *

Lect,

ond Lpelanit

| Zn Laglanrd

Vespa devia) .
iv rrervone Fe

— Cardinal Z
Way. | erranl.

Sop Bt ir tm 18 1 im yt dh et tl pt i, itn
TT eee ree

EEERERR EE Sep

H
1
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947986

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          1,653,996
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 137,031,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                      150,000
<INVENTORY>                                       193,361
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 98,940,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                        22,510,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     31,550,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   98,940,532
<SALES>                                         3,406,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,406,939
<CGS>                                             608,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,065,351
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   75,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,489,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      168,912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.49
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>