alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1077 

To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 

reauthorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2013 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. CARPER, Mr. WARNER, Mr. 

COONS, and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to 

provide for the reauthorization of the Chesapeake Bay 

Gateways and Watertrails Network. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake Bay Gate5 ways and Watertrails Network Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 Section 502(c) of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act 

8 of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 105–312) is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years’’ and all that follows 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1077 IS

1 through the period at the end and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 

2 2014 through 2018.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### W. J. LANG, individually and as Executor of the Last Will and Testament of Marie Lang, Deceased, Appellant, v. Donna KOCH et al., Appellees.

No. 71-587.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 2, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Stewart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2022284EN.01003401.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/34

---

Order of the General Court of 30 May 2022 — mBank v EUIPO — European Merchant Bank (EMBANK European Merchant Bank)

(Case T-331/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 284/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: mBank S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska and K. Gajek, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: European Merchant Bank UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: G. Pranevičius, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, mBank S.A., seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 March 2021 (Case R 1845/2020-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between itself and the intervener, European Merchant Bank (‘the contested decision’).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action

| 2. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.

---
#### OMER CORPORATION, doing business as Remo’s Restaurant, Appellant, v. George DUKE, Appellee.

No. 67-718.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 28, 1968.

Louis A. Sabatino, Miami, for appellant.

Norman Francis Haft, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, which was the defendant in the trial court, appeals a final judgment and assigns as error the trial court’s denial of its motion for a new trial. It affirmatively appears from the record that a procedural irregularity, which was the basis of the motion for a new trial, occurred during the final argument of appellant’s counsel before the jury retired. Appellant’s counsel learned of it before the jury returned to deliver its verdict, but he did not complain until the adverse verdict had been announced. Under these circumstances we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, for a new trial. See Tyus v. Apalachicola Northern Railroad Company, Fla.1961, 130 So.2d 580, 587, 588.

Affirmed.
#### Spencer F. NEEDHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-137.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 9, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Volie Williams, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,399,905
<SECURITIES>                                 2,111,608
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,511,513
<PP&E>                                      19,359,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,871,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,740,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,871,014
<SALES>                                      1,712,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,912,590
<CGS>                                          147,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               477,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,287,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,287,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,287,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    18.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    18.63
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   1 yr
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            817,367
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,002,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                      208,188
<INVENTORY>                                     1,063,355
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5,836,842
<PP&E>                                            264,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  7,798,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,659,071
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           1,803,333
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           30,053
<OTHER-SE>                                      3,088,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    7,798,937
<SALES>                                        69,561,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               69,561,525
<CGS>                                          67,285,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  71,401,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (206,432)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 22,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               ( 1,637,272)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        3,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,024,343)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.73)


</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                    /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Michael E. DeDomenico
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    May 10, 2006
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947986
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Seven

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          2,215,972
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 161,381,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                      177,222
<INVENTORY>                                       155,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                125,282,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                        44,829,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     37,109,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  125,282,592
<SALES>                                         5,898,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,898,186
<CGS>                                             908,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,702,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  150,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,902,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      235,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.62
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
#### Graham TEATERS, Petitioner, v. BROWARD MARINE, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 36536.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1967.

Richard L. Seidel, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Anthony J. Beisler, Fort Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

*158PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Request for Tier 3 Exemptions

The Skylift team developed the first electric conversion kits for helicopters and built the heavy-lift drone 

that carried Lady Gaga at her concerts. Our IP is focused on an innovative rotor system which provides a 

sustainable performance advantage over competitors using the same batteries or motors. Our tricopter 

designs are based on decades of experience with the benefits and risks of helicopters. We are 

requesting exemption from the 55-lb. MTOW (Part 107) and external load limitations (Part 133) under 

14 CFR.

Our prototypes are based on the proven track record of full-size helicopters and RC helicopters, 

however, we have added additional safety and reliability improvements. While keeping safety features 

like autorotation, we have removed the need for a swashplate. These reductions in moving parts and 

points of failure has resulted in a more reliable and serviceable vehicle. Balancing of torque between 

two of the main rotors reduces the load on the tail to 1/3 compared with single-rotor helicopters. 

Additionally, by remotely piloting the UAS, we have removed the pilot from danger during flight 

operations.

At present, we do not fly autonomously, our international award-winning pilot Reza Nemovi controls the 

vehicle within line of sight using an RC remote. The vehicle operates below 400 ft. agl and does not fly 

near or over people. These vehicles are purely used for R&D to demonstrate the capability of Skylift’s 

intellectual property to potential customers and investors. Our hope is to continue developing this 

technology in coordination with FAA guidelines to create a safe and reliable commercial vehicle. 

In addition to the hundreds of hours spent designing, machining and bench testing our vehicles, we have 

attached an Excel spreadsheet used to record our experimental flight logs. In addition to our 3D CAD 

drawings, please see the attached manuals and links for our components.

○ Attached

■ Align T-rex 700 tail

■ DJI NAZA Flight Controller

■ YGE 320HV ESC

■ SAB HPS 3

■ SAB H0429-S

○ Linked

■ Hitec Aurora 9x RC

■ Castle Creations HV160 ESC

■ Castle Creations 80 ESC

■ HiTec 8SB9360TH Servos

■ NeuMotor 1915 1.5Y

■ NeuMotor 2230 .5Y

■ NeuMotor 1910 2Y
254 La. 126

#### STATE ex rel. Richard SCOTT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 49895.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 5, 1969.

In re: Richard Scott applying for writ of mandamus.

Application denied. Relator is not entitled to the relief requested. See La.R.S. 15:574.9, subd. E.
P e No A ees Inquiries numbered 7, 16, and 17 are not to bo aiked in respect to infants. Inguiries numbered 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are to be
a6 : oo EEN OY OS SERRE AN, S85L:

SCHEDULE _].—Inhabitants in SA 4fj, } , @ _,in the County of _

of Aricta24 enumerated by me on the ____ day of , 1870 af
Post Office: "  /Leeeulylamase2 = | Zit: Ass't Marshal.

Epu Ca- CONSTITUTIONAL
TION, RELATION

;
4

Color.—White (W,), Black}

OWXED. ‘ PARENTAGE.

| =a =

?

i = = : ; VALUE oF Rea EstatTr |

ut

) Mule Citizensof U.S, of 2

| Le
Whether deaf |x

I's
| and dumb, es a

|

aa

Place of Birth, naming State
or Territory of U. S.; or the |
; Country, if of foreign birth. ;

{

Profession, Occupation,
or Trade of each person,
male or female.

| The name of every person whose
| place of abode on the fret day of
June, 1870, was in this family.

reign birth.
of
0

21 yeure of ag

wards,

| blind, insane,

of visitation,

or idiotic.

If born within the year, stato.
| Cannot write,

ee ee ee ee

the order of visitation.
cso right to vote is

enled cr abridged on
ther grounds than re-

in
(
€
| vellion or other crime.

Females (F.)

years ofnge and upwards,

month (Jan., Feb., &c.)

Families, numbered! in tho onler
Value of Persoun) Estate.
month (Jan., Feb., &c.)

(L.), Mulatto (M.), Chi-
nese (C.), Indian (J)
Mother cf foreign birth.

in fractions, thus, ye

Aco at Inst birthday, If
under] year, give months |

Sex.—Males (M.),

Caunot rend.
Male Citizens

|
}

Father of fi

—

' Dwelling-houses, numbered In

|
oy j

|
|

@ | Value of Nenl Ustate.

Kw |
S
>)
=
a) |

| et | Tf married within the year, state
} er Attended school within the year.
est

C
iB |

we
ha

PEPPER EeCEE

ae
we

r
a

| 8 iy Wasce Hillam Bp A!
2} | od Sp. |

—_—__—

Se c&c¢& NN 8 BH » B&H BU

—

ns
=

NV
1S Maur Yeti. 34 \e
__| —— Gatrhne 7p |
ee | ee Vpt02 ih /¢ Pre |
ii Ps Plun Jasot <b
| 10. 16 Chiatln Yoark ttle
: |— Jrany Lo \ fh
lok Geie \&.
+ 1, wee y vectra OF | a

t

— ~tA 26 £0! Mg /tewes |_|
AT" 3 oe Ai SCE Willen tee shoe: =e)
WAM dow jek Za Ae ne, are

ou ocal 27. Gu byl ae

|

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

C1 bi- € e FA | be - cei =|
dle hi VA 2 POG |e Ratorere |
hey CLAP he Plc qi Pe
VLG |

Bs Mong rd Ne AP ae tape Narn 2

Lek S ye\ Ad Miia,”
FS Bigesut 4 Mee, be Anrees

ee -_———

\y No. of dwellings, er No, of white females, re. No. of males, forcign born, ati

* families ** colored iaales, tow 8 fiemalesy ¢ a af
“ white males 7 ** females, ea st.

is A

{
snpelca)

‘county

Torlusne om crHex owsion oF COUNTY

ln

an NAME €F smTUTION

THIRTEE}

awe oF wconPonurco sLuce Al 2.8

ENUMERATED GY ME_ON THE

ia

DEPARTMENT OF COMMEROE AND LABOR-BUREAU OF THE CENSUS

ITH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 910—POPULATION

59

ont oF Abie

SUPERNSORS DISTRICT NO.
amin Borer

agai

Bhs

SE

Tae 41

int ghee

~ ee
[Wig aso

my

gia

4a).

Historic census record:

oie

Jo 4|

is are maintained and released by the National Archives and Ré

Visit http://www. archives.gov for more information about publicly aval

jecords

Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

lable records like the one shown here.

SST
Bets] SEF

2

{
{
7

sie

Vettel REO | | [feng tt meee ip on | agate ob i
Te Vat 3) Tyler hotdog macs ot. eth | Boat Weed rnaty |W Vk dele
bre Peal o|_\ tae Zoeel, pte Ocak New tang ee Dagpcbe” |i Vela
im 9 ib RISEN th clei aaraes ar al | Rye Apacer eee Pe
ra ra I Ce iar Goa pai (es ee
| Pata int pep lait fied Jade lo ere. iad
Den Lith hy om fap ; -
| Ee, Pee acme a Behe ese By Amen
rs oath = is bk a a Veal 1
Varsinoleatha Ze ae Ml Shape 4
lalgeesstas Tee | Nes Bee 4
pit ee ee (iene, Verses fe _|
inte fe macrsiie ers Sg aM vara i
ll Tim Fete BS
pogo Degen (Cagiva |. Pea Laeeh. Tar Weel ba! i
Sistas 0 De Fong ba KO Do Song bt L0 ers | 5 passin Pyle fouk, | Valo fe
aa en Coa ee
HE ie —lgeed Vomeitnns God ch Ye be
Pinca Pha d, Vrteg 08. Bere VLA
ieee pan aaah Slay a oT, aan babe : -
aed Seeder f Sunal, Serutuh | Sed Serle, lot sb | sg Ga [9 ero loony) |e Yalta _f
ape oy Ad Hy Sa A reyes bit ag bine 8 if, an oT f es ax
Le ee cB seoue im Wee [eo a (a Pola bated M1
ie ead SDA alan [2% iy rar aie aa rs
ae |
onal) 5 Sede Tn ase AVA ie mene I
petal Peal Bo Pada dR” deca ta cee
i i ” | :
‘ neds | Z ® TES
ae ae Goer Glad Sea Pracicle.| 4 | 7
#### Merle VAN CLEAF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-287.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 15, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Willie Anderson DOCK, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-685.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 14, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; John G. Ferris, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Manuel TALAVERA, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Adult Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-540.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 19, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
254 La. 127

#### STATE ex rel. George BUCHERT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 49898.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 5, 1969.

In re: George Buchert applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ refused. Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. See 15:574.9, subd. E.
Exhibit 11.1



UNITIL CORPORATION



COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                      |      |                         |       |  |      |       |  |   |      
|----------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ----------------------- | ----- |  | ---- | ----- |  | - | -----
|                                                      |      | Year Ended December 31,
|                                                      | 2007 |                         | 2006  |  | 2005
|EARNINGS PER SHARE (000s, except per share data)     |      |                         |       |  |      |       |  |   |      
|Net Income                                            |      | $                       | 8,746 |  | $    | 8,033 |  | $ | 8,553
|Less: Dividend Requirements on Preferred Stock        |      |                         | 136   |  |      | 133   |  |   | 156  
|                                                      |      |                         |       |  |      |       |  |   |      
|Net Income Applicable to Common Stock                 |      | $                       | 8,610 |  | $    | 7,900 |  | $ | 8,397
|                                                      |      |                         |       |  |      |       |  |   |      
|Average Number of Common Shares OutstandingBasic     |      |                         | 5,659 |  |      | 5,597 |  |   | 5,551
|Dilutive Effect of Stock Options and Restricted Stock |      |                         | 13    |  |      | 15    |  |   | 17   
|Average Number of Common Shares OutstandingDiluted   |      |                         | 5,672 |  |      | 5,612 |  |   | 5,568
|Earnings Per ShareBasic                              |      | $                       | 1.52  |  | $    | 1.41  |  | $ | 1.51 
|Earnings Per ShareDiluted                            |      | $                       | 1.52  |  | $    | 1.41  |  | $ | 1.51