alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**Certification**

I, Bennie H. Duck,certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of First Investors Financial Services Group, Inc.

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The Company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and based on such evaluation:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport (based on such evaluation); and

c)        Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  Mar 14, 2007
|        | By: /s/ BENNIE H. DUCK  |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Bennie H. Duck          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### R. K. OVERSTREET v. BAL HARBOUR REGENCY HOTEL CORPORATION.

No. 38675.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 222 So.2d 270.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50561

HEATHER CLARK; DAVID CLAXTON; DAVID M. COMPTON,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

WILLIAMSON COUNTY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:10–CV–00869–LY

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This action for unpaid wages involves a dispute over the implementation

of the Fluctuating Workweek (“FWW”) method for calculating overtime pay. See

29 C.F.R. § 778.114. Named plaintiffs Heather Clark, David Claxton, David

Compton, and 112 other paramedics (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) sued their

employer, Williamson County (“the County”), alleging that it violated the Fair

Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., by failing to pay them at

least one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for overtime hours. The

district court entered summary judgment for the County, adopting a magistrate

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 16, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-50561 Document: 00512344068 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2013
No. 12-50561

judge’s report and recommendation concluding that the County’s payment

scheme complied with the FLSA under the FWW method. Plaintiffs timely filed

a notice of appeal and contend that the County’s compensation system was not

a valid FWW system.

We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Am.

Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. Rentech Steel LLC, 620 F.3d 558, 562 (5th Cir.

2010) (citing Am. Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. Canal Indem. Co., 352 F.3d 254,

259–60 (5th Cir. 2003)). Plaintiffs “bear[] the burden of proving that the

[County] failed to properly administer the FWW method.” Samson v. Apollo

Res., Inc., 242 F.3d 629, 636 (5th Cir. 2001) (citing Cash v. Conn Appliances, Inc.,

2 F. Supp. 2d 884, 896 (E.D. Tex. 1997)). The magistrate judge determined that

Plaintiffs could not meet this burden. The district court agreed with this

decision, concluding that the magistrate judge’s “application of the law and legal

analysis in support of his conclusions [was] sufficient and appropriate.” We

agree. After reviewing the briefs and relevantlaw, examining pertinent portions

of the record, and hearing oral argument, we conclude that the County is

entitled to summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-50561 Document: 00512344068 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2013
| add bar ree! BAU ‘OF THE CENSUS om scrlusigons tase ee
2 EY FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES: 1920—POPULATION a ee Da
4 Pon one RRM OF COUNTY terermeriw cn pee cess NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE ____ eee DA ir ¥ “Wras oF city mish Ay 0
ose SRR OF BREEN rarest ern Ons ae se — ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE TH 48 vay Or —Qlennang 120 IG, Mk0 pat iy on”
La prory wenavion, | rome | mmm mara | crrmexani? pamecation, Sa = oe i anemnealisi 20! :
L sap wbonqued r Re aa ule T Ta Ia T AS __ ScceraTion. asc ;
Anmaay 1, 1900, was i FY ft i j3 Hi] li te 4
met te “Sopeces |I aA i I HE = | = = wo, — " % ponte. | sapeany, ‘* altel’ O
amr ~| i oF lla Se BP ; SE AE SS SS =
a ala Daeg bh Beret aiecias epee |e Cae brake. : wean : a N coleeles
st eet iat a Roe, Ge fet ate
a ae DoT Wate CTW Mid ted Mor Unk as ens Teh I POORER RRA del Be HL
i ——" | Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau. y = NET mas yap
2 sg _ a Traber Real Calite l
A] pup : ‘ Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here. |
Dt ars |_FEIW Iasi fel) a Le op pe
Pt est eet ae
) : [te ly tenia et Caren ae ae
Se ee Bf,
Sa Pao re pa ficial ie : miglil i
| a a
| ag er A a
T2106 83} Baw Mens Hund Ola we MU
| id oni MW to S
rr Wa s
aS 5 dN
MW Se 3
MW > Mt
ea oh ART) ee
FEW 90d]
“eat A
xsi a
1a Xi
[FE W, B03 TRO at |
EW 26 $ lim ah
twice Sr
: a W. 40 3
W 35S tw Wn
IM W. 5% Mlueer a inv
FW so MRE) Ae Wi
“FEW 3s DP. a
Wiis S|
Mi 471M zi
Fe | W | 43/4,
FY Ga
iY cama
we im
ft
i
#### CARNEGIE HOTEL CORPORATION, d/b/a Blue Waters Hotel, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. William H. JACOBI, Appellee.

No. 66-777.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 15, 1967.

Silverstein & Nachwalter, Miami, for appellant;

Podhurst & Orseck, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, defendant in the trial court, appeals an order granting a new trial. The action was for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant’s employee acting in the scope of his employment. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant and the trial judge granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The grounds set forth in the order granting the new trial are: (1) the verdict is *201contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence; (2) the verdict shows that the jury misunderstood the legal effect of the evidence; (3) the verdict upon the evidence presented shocked the judicial conscience of the court. The appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion under the rule announced in Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669, and applied in Bennett v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority, Fla.1961, 131 So.2d 740.

Affirmed.
#### Ronald H. SANDS v. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 36119.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1967.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 20, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis*                     (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

                    1.                     *PF Investors, Inc., Whitehall, Wisconsin;*                     to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of PFSB Bancorporation, Inc., Whitehall, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire Pigeon Falls State Bank, Pigeon Falls, Wisconsin.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 19, 2018.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-15790 Filed 7-23-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the annual report of The Furia Organization, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Martin
Cohen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Martin Cohen
------------------------------
Martin Cohen
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
July 6, 2004


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
• 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 21 

Usting of EDB Wastes 

51 FR 5327·5331 

February 13, 1986 

(HSWA Cluster I) 

FEDERAL 

REQUIREMENT 

FEDERAL 

RCRA 

CITATION 

ANALOGOUS 

STATE 

CITATION 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

EQUIVALENT 

MORE 

STRINGENT 

BROADERIN 

SCOPE 

PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE WAC 173-303 

SUBPART D - LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 

WASTE FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES 

list of "K" waste 261.32 9904 x 

§261.32 - Hazardous waste from specific sources 

EPA Hazardous Hazard 

Waste No. Hazardous Waste Code 

(Organic Chemicals) • K117 Wastewater from the reactor vent gas scrubber in the production (T)

of ethylene dibromide via bromination of ethene. 

K118 Spent adsorbent solids from purification of ethylene dibromide (T) 

dibromide in the production of ethylenedibromide via bromination 

. of ethene. 

K136 Still bottoms from the purification of ethylene dibromide in the (T) 

production of ethylene dibromide via bromination of ethene. 

APPENDIX III TO PART 261 

add compound Appendix III 110(3)(f) x 

Compound Method No. 

Ethylene dibromide . 8010,8240 

APPENDIX VII TO PART 261 

• 

hazardous constituents Appendix VII 082(4) x 

February 13, 1986 - Page 1 of 2 
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 21: Usting 

of EDB Wastes (cont'd) 

FEDERAL 

REQUIREMENT 

FEDERAL 

RCRA 

CITATION 

ANALOGOUS 

STATE 

CITATION 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

MORE 

EQUIV· STRINALENT GENT 

BROADERIN 

SCOPE 

EPA Hazardous Hazardous constituents 

Waste No. for which listed 

K117 Ethytene dibromide 

K118 : Ethylene dibromide 

K136 · Ethytene dibromide 

o
 

February 13, 1986 - Page 2 of 2 

+ 

c
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      19,424,000
<SECURITIES>                                12,694,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,129,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   690,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,327,000
<PP&E>                                       7,264,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,021,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,851,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,275,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,025,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,851,000
<SALES>                                     28,104,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,263,000
<CGS>                                          266,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,673,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               365,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,206,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,362,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,844,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,844,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1(A)****Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**          I, Dr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Professional Veterinary Products,Ltd.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registration, and we have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based onsuch evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: December 14, 2005./s/Dr. Lionel L. ReillyDr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and Chief
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**

 

I, William P. Lyons, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AXS-OneInc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: November 12, 2004 | /s/ William P. Lyons      |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                    | William P. Lyons          |
|                    | Chairman of the Board and |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

1

----
#### Marilyn Foerst McQUAIN, a single woman, et al., Appellants, v. Clifton W. WHITMORE, Appellee.

No. 70-1200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 14, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Arthur S. BEST and Elizabeth Best, his wife, et al., Appellants, v. H. O. LASSETER, Sr. and Gwendolyn G. Lasseter, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 67-489.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 6, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Hendry EDGAR, Appellant, v. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 71-317.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 20, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.