API/NPRA Comments on Non-Continental Liquids Subcategory

July 15, 2011

ATTACHMENT 1



















































































API/NPRA Comments on Non-Continental Liquids Subcategory

July 15, 2011

ATTACHMENT 2
Tesoro Hawaii Refinery

SG-1102 Boiler

Engineering Tests for

Carbon Monoxide, Particulates and Metals 

Report Number: 10-1933

October 7-9, 2010

Prepared for:

Tesoro Hawaii Refinery

91-325 Komohana Street

Kapolei, HI 96707

Prepared by:

Emission Technologies, Inc.

15609 Peterson Road, Suite D

Burlington, WA 98233
INVOLVED PARTIES:

Contact:

Albert Alvarez

91-325 Komohana Street

Kapolei, HI 96707

Phone: (808) 547-3824

Fax: (808) 547-3868

E-mail: aalvarez@tsocorp.com

Emission Technologies, Inc.

Contact:

Rob Rusi

15609-D Peterson Rd.

Burlington, Washington 98233

Phone: (800) 507-9018

Phone: (360) 757-1210

Fax: (360) 757-1118

E-mail: eti@eti-usepa.com
REPORT TEXT

SUMMARIES

FIELD DATA

GASES: PM TEST

FIELD/LAB DATA

PARTICULATES

FIELD DATA

GASES: METALS TEST

FIELD/LAB DATA

METALS

TEST AMERICA 

LABORATORY REPORT

QUALITY ASSURANCE/

QUALITY CONTROL
Report Text

Introduction

Test Overview

Overview of Sampling Methods

Results and Reporting Conditions 

Process Overview 

Participants
Introduction:

Tesoro Hawaii Refinery (Tesoro) operates an 82 MMBtu heat input steam generator, (SG-1102) which 

produces steam for refinery processes. At the time of the source test, the boiler was firing at 32.3 

MMBtu/hr based on stack flow rates and dry fuel factors. Emission Technologies Inc. (ETI) was 

contracted by Tesoro to provide some “in house” testing on the boiler for carbon carbon monoxide 

(CO), particulates (PM) and metals. The metals to be tested were arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, 

chromium, manganese, nickel and lead.

Test Overview:

ETI performed tests on the outlet (stack) of the SG-1102 on October 7th through the 9th. Table 1.0 lists 

the overall sampling program used. Source tests for each parameter are specified following the 

standard EPA requirements listed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A.

Table 1.0

Field Sampling Program

Unit Parameter Test Method Number of Test 

Runs Time/Test

SG-1102 Sample Point 

Determination

EPA Methods 1 1 -

SG-1102 Velocity and Flow EPA Method 2 6 60/180 minutes

SG-1102 O2 and CO2 EPA Method 3A 6 60/180 minutes

SG-1102 Moisture EPA Method 4 6 60/180 minutes

SG-1102 PM EPA Methods

5/202 3 60 minutes

SG-1102 CO EPA Method 10 6 60/180 minutes

SG-1102 Metals EPA Method 29 3 180 minutes
Overview of the Sampling Methods:

EPA Method 1 - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources

EPA Method 1 was used to aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or 

total volumetric flow rate from a stationary source. A measurement site where the effluent 

stream was flowing in a known direction was selected, and the cross-section of the stack was 

divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point was then located within each of these 

equal areas. The sampling traverse points for Method 1 need only be determined once.

EPA Method 2 - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate

The average gas velocity in each stack was determined from the gas density and from 

measurement of the average velocity head with a Type S (Stausscheibe) or reverse type Pitot 

tube. 

EPA Method 4 – Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas

A sample of the gas stream was extracted at a constant rate and then condensed and metered 

using an EPA Method 5 sample train. The weight gain of moisture condensed was determined 

gravimetrically. The moisture content is measured as grams of water collected and referenced 

to the amount of dry gas sampled to get the fractional water content of the stack gas.

EPA Method 5/202 - Determination of Particulate and Condensable Particulate Matter 

Particulate matter was withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber 

filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 248 ± 25°F (120 ± 14°C). Particulate matter 

that was deposited on the nozzle, probe and front half of the filer holder were rinsed with 

acetone and collected in sample bottles. The acetone was then evaporated off at the laboratory 

and desiccated for 24 hours. The particulate mass from the rinse and filter were determined 

gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. 

The condensable particulate matter (CPM), back half fraction, is the material that condenses 

after passing through the filter and was analyzed using Method 202 (OTM28). The method uses 

a Method 5 sampling train with the addition of a condenser, a water dropout impinger and a 

modified Greenburg Smith impinger (both dry) followed by a Teflon CPM filter. The impinger 

contents were immediately purged after the run for one hour with nitrogen to remove dissolved 

sulfur dioxide gases. The CPM filter was extracted with water and methylene chloride. The 

impingers are recovered, rinsed and the organic and aqueous fractions are separated using 
methylene chloride. The organic and aqueous fractions are then taken to dryness and 

residues weighed. The total of both fractions represents the CPM.

EPA Method 3A - Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Stationary 

Sources (Instrumental)

EPA Method 10 – Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary Sources 

(Instrumental)

Methods 3A and 10 use electronic gas analyzers for the measurement of O2, CO2 and CO. 

The sampled gas was continuously extracted from the stack through a heated probe/filter 

assembly to a moisture knock-out that removed water from the stack gas. The dry stack 

gas was transported from the outlet of the moisture knock-out through a Teflon line to a 

mobile test trailer containing the gas analyzer. Inside the test trailer the stack gas passed 

through a vacuum/pressure pump to a gas manifold. The sampled gas was divided into 

separate streams through stainless steel metering valves and glass flow meters. The 

analyzer detected the concentration of analyte gas within the sample and produced an 

output electrical signal proportional to analyte gas concentration. The electrical signals 

were recorded on a laptop computer. Instrument calibrations (zero and span checks) were 

performed as per 40 CFR 60. Sampling system calibration (external calibration) was 

accomplished by sending EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases to a location ahead of the 

filter assembly. Analyzer calibration and linearity determinations (internal calibration) 

were accomplished by sending the EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases directly to the 

analyzers. All components of the gas sampling and calibration system were constructed 

of Teflon, 316 stainless steel, or glass. The sample vacuum/pressure pump head was 

constructed of 316 stainless steel, Viton O-rings, and a Teflon coated diaphragm.

EPA Method 29 - Metals

A stack sample was withdrawn isokinetically from the source, particulate emissions were 

collected in the probe and on a heated filter, and gaseous emissions were then collected in 

an aqueous acidic solution of hydrogen peroxide. Samples were sent to an outside 

laboratory for analysis. The recovered samples were digested and appropriate fractions 

were analyzed for arsenic (As), beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), Lead 

(Pb), Manganese (Mn) and nickel (Ni) were analyzed by inductively coupled plasmamass spectroscopy (ICP-MS).
Results and Reporting Conditions

The results of the pollutant emission tests are presented in Section 2. The units of reporting for 

the gases are parts per million dry volume (ppmdv) and pounds per hour (lb/hr). The units of 

reporting for the gases are parts per million dry volume (ppmdv), pounds per hour (lb/hr) and 

pounds per million Btu (lb/MMBtu). Particulates are reported in units of milligrams (mg), grains 

per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf), gr/dscf corrected to 7% oxygen, lb/hr and lb/MMBtu. 

Metals are reported in units of micrograms per cubic foot (μg/cf) and lb/hr. The emission rates 

presented in the summaries are referenced to EPA standard conditions of 29.92 inches of 

mercury (“Hg) and 68 o

F.
Process Overview:

The boiler, which is fired on refinery fuel gas (RFG), fuel oil or a combination of both fuels, is rated at 

82 MMBtu/hr heat input. The unit was running on fuel oil during the test.

Figure 1 shows a conceptual diagram of the sampling location on the SG-1102.

SG- 1102

ETI Test 

Trailer

Figure 1

Participants:

ETI:

• Mr. Robert Rusi, Project Manager

• Mr. David Wagner, Field Technician

• Mr. Paige Mendoza, Field Technician

• Ms. Wendy Pounds, Quality Assurance Supervisor

Tesoro:

• Mr. Albert Alvarez served as project manager for Tesoro Hawaii Refinery.
Summaries

Table 2.0.1 Summary of Gases; 10/09/10

Table 2.0.2 Summary of Metals; 10/09/10

Table 2.1.1 Summary of Gases; 10/07/10-10/08/10

Table 2.1.2 Summary of Metals; 10/07/10-10/08/10
Client Tesoro Date: 10/09/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Unit: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

1 2 3

1 2 3

1 2 3 Average

ppmdv 0.96 2.48 3.32 2.25

ppmdv @ 15% O2 0.35 0.93 1.25 0.84

lb/MMBtu 0.0008 0.0022 0.0030 0.0020

lb/hr 0.021 0.057 0.077 0.052

Summary

Table 2.0.1

Run Number O2 Average

5.12

11.69 11.86

4.89 5.19 5.29

Run Number Average

Percent

Percent 12.09 11.79

CO2

CO Run Number:
Client Tesoro Date: 10/09/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Unit: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1933

RUN #1

Net Wt. gr/dscf

(mg) @ 7% O2

FRONT HALF:

Probe & Nozzle:............................ 1.7 0.00099 0.00088 0.00086 0.00170 0.042

Filter:............................................ 2.1 0.00122 0.00108 0.00106 0.00210 0.052

Totals:............................................ 3.8 0.00221 0.00196 0.00192 0.00380 0.094

BACK HALF:

Inorganic:...................................... 142.9 0.08318 0.07396 0.07222 0.14299 3.561

Organic:........................................ 12.5 0.00728 0.00647 0.00632 0.01251 0.312

Totals:............................................ 155.4 0.09046 0.08043 0.07854 0.15550 3.873

TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 159.2 0.0927 0.0824 0.0805 0.15930 3.967

RUN #2

Net Wt. gr/dscf

(mg) @ 7% O2

FRONT HALF:

Probe & Nozzle:............................ 4.8 0.00253 0.00224 0.00224 0.00443 0.115

Filter:............................................ 0.8 0.00042 0.00037 0.00037 0.00074 0.019

Totals:............................................ 5.6 0.00295 0.00261 0.00261 0.00517 0.134

BACK HALF:

Inorganic:...................................... 91.4 0.04813 0.04269 0.04258 0.08432 2.187

Organic:........................................ 12.6 0.00663 0.00588 0.00587 0.01162 0.301

Totals:............................................ 104.0 0.05476 0.04857 0.04845 0.09594 2.488

TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 109.6 0.05771 0.05118 0.05106 0.10111 2.622

RUN #3

Net Wt. gr/dscf

(mg) @ 7% O2

FRONT HALF:

Probe & Nozzle:............................ 3.6 0.00189 0.00168 0.00168 0.00333 0.087

Filter:............................................ 0.0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.000

Totals:............................................ 3.6 0.00189 0.00168 0.00168 0.00333 0.087

BACK HALF:

Inorganic:...................................... 73.5 0.03859 0.03424 0.03436 0.06804 1.773

Organic:........................................ 3.4 0.00179 0.00159 0.00159 0.00316 0.082

Totals:............................................ 76.9 0.04038 0.03583 0.03595 0.07120 1.855

TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 80.5 0.04227 0.03751 0.03763 0.07453 1.942

Net Wt. gr/dscf

AVERAGES FOR ALL RUNS (mg) @ 7% O2

FRONT HALF: 4.3 0.0024 0.0021 0.0021 0.00410 0.105

BACK HALF: 112.1 0.0619 0.0549 0.0543 0.10755 2.739

TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):........ 116.4 0.0642 0.0570 0.0564 0.11165 2.844

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

gr/dscf gr/scf lb/hr

Particulate Results: gr/dscf gr/scf lb/hr

Particulate Results:

Summary - Method 5 Particulate

Table 2.0.2

Particulate Results:

gr/scf lb/hr

gr/scf lb/hr

Particulate Results: gr/dscf

gr/dscf
Client Tesoro Date: 10/07/10

Location: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10

Unit: Boiler #3

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

10/07/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

1 2 3

1 2 3

1 2 3 Average

ppmdv 8.81 2.52 5.82 5.72

lb/hr 0.195 0.055 0.129 0.126

Percent 11.18 11.81 11.64 11.54

CO Run Number:

Percent 6.20 5.28 5.43 5.64

CO2

Run Number Average

Summary

Table 2.1.1

O2

Run Number Average
Client: Tesoro Date : 10/07/10

City: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

10/07/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

1.603 1.526 1.452 1.527

lb/hr 0.00108 0.00102 0.00098 0.00103

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.00184 0.00184 0.00181 0.00183

lb/hr 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000012

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.00184 0.00184 0.00181 0.00183

lb/hr 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000012

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.0214 0.0103 0.0089 0.0135

lb/hr 0.0000144 0.0000069 0.0000060 0.0000091

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.0205 0.0065 0.0117 0.01290

lb/hr 0.0000138 0.0000043 0.0000079 0.0000087

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.00836 0.00712 0.00700 0.00749

lb/hr 0.0000056 0.0000047 0.0000047 0.0000050

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.405 0.424 0.408 0.412

lb/hr 0.00027 0.00028 0.00028 0.00028

Nickel Run Number

Manganese Run Number

Cadmium

Chromium Run Number

Lead Run Number

Run Number

Run Number

Summary

Table 2.1.2

Run Number Arsenic

Beryllium

Method 29 Metals Testing
PARTICULATES TEST

Gases: O2,CO2 & CO

Table 3.0.0-3.0.3 Calibration Data Sheets

Table 3.1.1 Run 1 Gases

Table 3.1.2 Run 2 Gases

Table 3.1.3 Run 3 Gases
Client: Tesoro ETI: Rob Rusi

Location: Kapolei, HI Dave Wagner

Unit: Boiler Paige Mendoza

Site: 1102 Fuel: Fuel Oil

Date: 10/09/10 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Instrument Information:

Instrument Channel Color Model

O2 - - ZRE

CO2 - - ZRE

SO2 - - -

NOx - - -

CO - - ZRE

HCs - - -

Recorders: - - -

Calibration Information:

Instrument Units Zero Span Range Gas Cyl. No.

O2 % N2 12.40 21.30 CC56348

O2 % N2 21.3 21.30 CC231540

CO2 % N2 12.5 21.00 CC56348

CO2 % N2 21 21.00 CC231540

SO2 ppmv - - - - -

SO2 ppmv - - - - -

NOx ppmv - - - - -

NOx ppmv - - - - -

CO ppmv N2 99.1 188.0 CC56781

CO ppmv N2 188.0 188.0 CC233240

HCs ppmv - - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - - -

-

Calibration Data

Table 3.0.0

Serial No.

A0A6534T

Make

A0A6534T

- -

Gas Flow (L/min)

-

CAI

CAI

-

- -

CAI

-

A0A6534T

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

 Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.0 0.0

Mid-Range Gas 12.4 12.3

High-Range Gas 21.3 21.1

40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 12.4

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.05%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.47%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.47% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.47% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.5% 0.0%

3

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

Direct Calibration Mode

0.00%

0.47%

0.94%

 Difference from 

Cylinder Value

0.00

0.10

Pre

1

2

Table 3.0.1

0.20

O2 Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal)
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

 Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.0 0.01

Mid-Range Gas 12.5 12.3

High-Range Gas 21.0 21.2

40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 12.5

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Pre

1

2

Table 3.0.2

0.20

CO2 Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal)

3

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

Direct Calibration Mode

0.05%

0.95%

0.95%

 Difference from 

Cylinder Value

0.01

0.20
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

 Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.0 0.81

Mid-Range Gas 99.1 96.0

High-Range Gas 188.0 185.0

40 CFR 60 Method 10-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 99.1

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.81 0.20 0.61 0.32%

Upscale Gas 96.00 95.30 0.70 0.37%

Zero Gas 0.81 0.36 0.45 0.16 0.24% 0.09%

Upscale Gas 96.00 95.80 0.20 0.50 0.11% 0.27%

Zero Gas 0.81 0.45 0.36 0.09 0.19% 0.05%

Upscale Gas 96.00 96.10 0.10 0.30 0.05% 0.16%

Zero Gas 0.81 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.24% 0.05%

Upscale Gas 96.00 95.40 0.60 0.70 0.32% 0.37%

3

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

Direct Calibration Mode

0.43%

1.65%

1.60%

 Difference from 

Cylinder Value

0.81

3.10

Pre

1

2

Table 3.0.3

3.00

CO Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal)
Client: Tesoro Run: 1

Site: 1102 Start Time: 8:45

Date: 10/09/10 End Time: 9:44

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

8:45 4.9 12.0 - - 0.9 -

8:46 4.8 12.0 - - 0.9 -

8:47 4.7 12.0 - - 1.0 -

8:48 4.8 12.0 - - 0.8 -

8:49 4.8 11.9 - - 1.1 -

8:50 4.8 11.9 - - 0.9 -

8:51 4.9 11.9 - - 1.1 -

8:52 4.9 11.9 - - 0.8 -

8:53 4.9 11.9 - - 0.9 -

8:54 4.9 11.9 - - 0.9 -

8:55 4.9 11.9 - - 0.8 -

8:56 4.9 11.9 - - 1.0 -

8:57 4.9 11.9 - - 1.0 -

8:58 4.8 11.9 - - 1.0 -

8:59 4.8 12.0 - - 1.1 -

9:00 4.8 11.9 - - 1.0 -

9:01 4.8 11.9 - - 0.8 -

9:02 4.8 11.9 - - 0.9 -

9:03 4.9 11.9 - - 0.9 -

9:04 4.9 11.9 - - 1.0 -

9:05 4.9 11.9 - - 1.0 -

9:06 4.9 11.9 - - 1.0 -

9:07 4.9 11.9 - - 0.9 -

9:08 4.8 11.9 - - 1.1 -

9:09 4.8 11.9 - - 1.2 -

9:10 4.8 12.0 - - 1.0 -

9:11 4.8 12.0 - - 0.9 -

9:12 4.8 11.9 - - 1.1 -

9:13 4.8 11.9 - - 1.1 -

9:14 4.9 11.9 - - 1.1 -

9:15 4.9 11.8 - - 1.1 -

9:16 5.0 11.8 - - 1.2 -

9:17 5.0 11.8 - - 1.2 -

9:18 5.0 11.8 - - 1.2 -

9:19 5.0 11.8 - - 1.3 -

9:20 5.0 11.8 - - 1.2 -

9:21 4.9 11.9 - - 1.0 -

9:22 5.0 11.8 - - 1.2 -

9:23 4.9 11.9 - - 1.1 -

9:24 4.9 11.9 - - 1.3 -

9:25 4.9 11.9 - - 1.3 -

9:26 5.0 11.8 - - 1.4 -

9:27 4.9 11.9 - - 1.4 -

9:28 4.9 11.9 - - 1.3 -

9:29 5.0 11.8 - - 1.2 -

9:30 5.0 11.8 - - 1.5 -

9:31 5.0 11.8 - - 1.4 -

9:32 5.0 11.8 - - 1.5 -

9:33 5.0 11.8 - - 1.2 -

9:34 5.0 11.8 - - 1.6 -

9:35 4.9 11.9 - - 1.8 -

9:36 4.9 11.9 - - 1.6 -

9:37 4.9 11.9 - - 1.3 -

9:38 5.0 11.8 - - 1.6 -

9:39 5.0 11.8 - - 1.5 -

9:40 5.0 11.8 - - 1.7 -

9:41 5.0 11.8 - - 1.4 -

9:42 5.0 11.8 - - 1.6 -

9:43 5.1 11.8 - - 1.8 -

9:44 5.1 11.8 - - 1.7 -

Raw Avg: 4.9 11.9 - - 1.2 -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 4.89 12.09 - - 0.96 -

Table 3.1.1

ETI Field Data
Client: Tesoro Run: 2

Site: 1102 Start Time: 10:21

Date: 10/09/10 End Time: 11:20

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

10:21 5.2 11.6 - - 2.8 -

10:22 5.2 11.6 - - 2.5 -

10:23 5.2 11.7 - - 2.3 -

10:24 5.1 11.7 - - 2.4 -

10:25 5.1 11.7 - - 2.4 -

10:26 5.1 11.8 - - 2.4 -

10:27 5.1 11.7 - - 2.6 -

10:28 5.1 11.7 - - 2.6 -

10:29 5.1 11.7 - - 2.3 -

10:30 5.2 11.7 - - 2.6 -

10:31 5.2 11.6 - - 2.4 -

10:32 5.2 11.6 - - 2.6 -

10:33 5.2 11.6 - - 2.7 -

10:34 5.2 11.7 - - 2.7 -

10:35 5.2 11.7 - - 2.8 -

10:36 5.2 11.7 - - 2.8 -

10:37 5.1 11.7 - - 2.6 -

10:38 5.1 11.7 - - 2.3 -

10:39 5.1 11.7 - - 2.5 -

10:40 5.1 11.7 - - 2.7 -

10:41 5.1 11.7 - - 2.5 -

10:42 5.1 11.7 - - 2.5 -

10:43 5.1 11.7 - - 2.4 -

10:44 5.1 11.7 - - 2.8 -

10:45 5.2 11.6 - - 2.7 -

10:46 5.2 11.6 - - 2.6 -

10:47 5.2 11.6 - - 2.8 -

10:48 5.2 11.6 - - 2.7 -

10:49 5.2 11.7 - - 2.8 -

10:50 5.2 11.7 - - 2.8 -

10:51 5.2 11.7 - - 2.6 -

10:52 5.2 11.6 - - 2.7 -

10:53 5.3 11.6 - - 2.8 -

10:54 5.3 11.6 - - 2.7 -

10:55 5.3 11.6 - - 2.9 -

10:56 5.3 11.6 - - 2.9 -

10:57 5.3 11.5 - - 3.0 -

10:58 5.3 11.6 - - 3.1 -

10:59 5.2 11.6 - - 3.1 -

11:00 5.2 11.6 - - 3.3 -

11:01 5.2 11.7 - - 3.1 -

11:02 5.2 11.7 - - 2.8 -

11:03 5.2 11.6 - - 3.2 -

11:04 5.2 11.6 - - 3.2 -

11:05 5.2 11.7 - - 3.0 -

11:06 5.2 11.7 - - 2.8 -

11:07 5.2 11.6 - - 2.8 -

11:08 5.2 11.6 - - 3.1 -

11:09 5.2 11.6 - - 2.9 -

11:10 5.3 11.6 - - 3.2 -

11:11 5.3 11.6 - - 3.2 -

11:12 5.3 11.6 - - 3.1 -

11:13 5.3 11.6 - - 3.0 -

11:14 5.2 11.6 - - 3.2 -

11:15 5.2 11.6 - - 3.4 -

11:16 5.2 11.6 - - 3.3 -

11:17 5.3 11.6 - - 3.4 -

11:18 5.2 11.6 - - 3.2 -

11:19 5.2 11.6 - - 3.4 -

11:20 5.2 11.6 - - 3.2 -

Raw Avg: 5.2 11.6 - - 2.8 -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 5.19 11.79 - - 2.48 -

Table 3.1.2

ETI Field Data
Client: Tesoro Run: 3

Site: 1102 Start Time: 12:02

Date: 10/09/10 End Time: 13:01

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

12:02 5.4 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:03 5.4 11.5 - - 3.8 -

12:04 5.4 11.4 - - 3.8 -

12:05 5.4 11.5 - - 3.3 -

12:06 5.3 11.5 - - 3.3 -

12:07 5.3 11.5 - - 3.5 -

12:08 5.3 11.5 - - 3.4 -

12:09 5.3 11.5 - - 3.4 -

12:10 5.3 11.5 - - 3.3 -

12:11 5.3 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:12 5.3 11.5 - - 3.5 -

12:13 5.3 11.5 - - 3.3 -

12:14 5.3 11.5 - - 3.5 -

12:15 5.3 11.5 - - 3.4 -

12:16 5.3 11.5 - - 3.5 -

12:17 5.4 11.5 - - 3.3 -

12:18 5.3 11.5 - - 3.7 -

12:19 5.3 11.5 - - 3.5 -

12:20 5.3 11.5 - - 3.4 -

12:21 5.3 11.5 - - 3.3 -

12:22 5.2 11.5 - - 3.3 -

12:23 5.3 11.5 - - 3.4 -

12:24 5.3 11.5 - - 3.4 -

12:25 5.3 11.5 - - 3.2 -

12:26 5.3 11.5 - - 3.2 -

12:27 5.4 11.5 - - 3.7 -

12:28 5.4 11.4 - - 3.7 -

12:29 5.4 11.4 - - 3.7 -

12:30 5.4 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:31 5.4 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:32 5.3 11.5 - - 3.5 -

12:33 5.3 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:34 5.2 11.6 - - 3.7 -

12:35 5.2 11.6 - - 3.4 -

12:36 5.3 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:37 5.3 11.5 - - 3.7 -

12:38 5.3 11.5 - - 3.9 -

12:39 5.3 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:40 5.3 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:41 5.4 11.4 - - 3.6 -

12:42 5.4 11.4 - - 3.5 -

12:43 5.4 11.4 - - 3.8 -

12:44 5.4 11.5 - - 3.8 -

12:45 5.3 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:46 5.3 11.5 - - 3.6 -

12:47 5.3 11.5 - - 3.7 -

12:48 5.2 11.6 - - 3.6 -

12:49 5.3 11.5 - - 3.9 -

12:50 5.3 11.5 - - 3.7 -

12:51 5.3 11.5 - - 4.0 -

12:52 5.3 11.5 - - 3.8 -

12:53 5.3 11.5 - - 3.8 -

12:54 5.4 11.4 - - 3.8 -

12:55 5.3 11.5 - - 4.0 -

12:56 5.3 11.5 - - 4.0 -

12:57 5.3 11.5 - - 4.0 -

12:58 5.3 11.5 - - 4.0 -

12:59 5.3 11.5 - - 4.3 -

13:00 5.3 11.5 - - 4.0 -

13:01 5.3 11.5 - - 4.1 -

Raw Avg: 5.3 11.5 - - 3.6 -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 5.29 11.69 - - 3.32 -

Table 3.1.3

ETI Field Data
PARTICULATES TEST

Flows

Table 4.0 Flows and Moisture Data Sheet 

Table 4.1 Lab Data 

Table 4.2 Fuel Data

Raw Data Sheets
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Unit: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1933

1 2 3

Run Start Time: 8:39 10:21 12:02

Run Finish Time: 9:39 11:21 13:02

θ Sample Time, minutes 60 60 60

Stack Shape (Circle or Rectangle):

Vm Dry Gas Meter Reading,dcf .................. ...........INITIAL: 696.543 724.083 754.358

FINAL: 723.702 754.143 784.413

Vm Volume of dry gas sampled, dcf 27.159 30.060 30.055

Y Meter box calibration factor 1.008 1.008 1.008

Pbar Barometric pressure, inches Hg 30.13 30.11 30.09

Pstatic Stack static pressure, inches H2O -0.07 -0.06 -0.06

∆H Differential meter press, inches H2O 0.5436 0.6126 0.6240

Tm Meter temperature, degrees F 90.9 91.3 89.3

Vlc Volume of H2O collected, ml 70.0 79.0 79.0

%O2 Percent of oxygen in stack gas 4.89 5.19 5.29

%CO2 Percent carbon dioxide in stack gas 12.09 11.79 11.69

Cp Type-S pitot tube coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84

Ave. square root of pitot readings, (inches H2O)1/2 0.1689 0.1799 0.1816

Ts Stack temperature, degrees F 403.4 406.8 404.3

Ds Stack diameter, feet - CIRCLE 4.00 4.00 4.00

Ls, Ws Stack dimensions, feet - RECTANGLE

Dn Nozzle diameter, inches 0.440 0.440 0.440

An Nozzle area, ft2 0.001056 0.001056 0.001056

Calculated Values:

Vm(std) Meter corrected volume,dscf 26.457 29.248 29.331

Vw(std) Volume of water vapor,dscf 3.301 3.725 3.725

Bws Fraction of H2O vapor 0.1109 0.1130 0.1127

Bws/sat Fraction of H2O vapor at saturated conditions 8.7982 9.0562 8.8740

%N2 Percent nitrogen in stack gas 83.02 83.02 83.02

Md Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 30.13 30.09 30.08

Mw Wet molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 28.78 28.72 28.72

Ad Cross sectional area of stack, ft2 12.57 12.57 12.57

Ps Absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg 30.12 30.11 30.09

Vs Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec 12.10 12.93 13.04

Qstd Average stack volumetric flowrate, wscfm 5,618 5,977 6,042

Qstd Average stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm 4,995 5,302 5,361

I Percent isokinetic sampling 105.1 109.5 108.6

Circle

Table 4.0

Flows and Moisture

Field Data

Run Number:

∆P avg
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Unit: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1933

PARTICULATE LABORATORY DATA:

1 2 3

1.8997 1.9107 1.9118

1.8970 1.9049 1.9072

Blank acetone weight, g............................................. 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010

0.0017 0.0048 0.0036

0.3288 0.3298 0.3270

0.3267 0.3290 0.3279

0.0021 0.0008 0.0000

TOTAL FRONT HALF PARTICULATE, g: 0.0038 0.0056 0.0036

1 2 3

2.0764 2.0064 1.9873

1.8818 1.8827 1.8874

0.0517 0.0323 0.0264

0.1429 0.0914 0.0735

1.9188 1.9148 1.9041

1.9060 1.9019 1.9004

Blank methylene chloride weight, g.............................. 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003

0.0125 0.0126 0.0034

Vt -Volume of NH4OH titrant, ml............................ 30.35 18.95 15.50

TOTAL BACK HALF PARTICULATE, g: 0.1554 0.1040 0.0769

TOTAL PARTICULATE, g: 0.1592 0.1096 0.0805

Organic:

Final weight, g:.....................................................................

Tare weight, g:.................................................................

Weight gain, g:....................................................................

Inorganic:

Final weight, g:.....................................................................

Tare weight, g:.................................................................

Weight gain, g:................................................................

Probe/Nozzle Wash Residue Wt .

Final weight, g:.....................................................................

Tare weight, g:.......................................................................

Weight gain, g:........................................................

Mc - Mass of NH4

+

 added to sample, g:.................................

Run Number:

Laboratory Data

Table 4.1

Run Number:

BACK HALF OF TRAIN

FRONT HALF OF TRAIN

Filter Wt.

Final weight, g:.....................................................................

Tare weight, g:.......................................................................

Weight gain, g:........................................................
Unit: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10

Client: Kapolei, HI Fuel: Fuel Oil

Location: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Fuel Data/Ambient Conditions 1 2 3

Qf Fuel flow rate, scfm - - -

FBTU Fuel heating value - gross Btu/lb 19,688 19,688 19,688

FO2 O2 F-factor, dscf/MMBtu 9,218 9,218 9,218

%O2 Average percent of oxygen in stack gas 4.89 5.19 5.29

lb/hr CO2 emissions from stack - - -

Calculated Values: 1 2 3

Qstd, (Ave stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm) - - -

Fuel Flow (MMBtu/hr) - - -

M-19 Stack Flow

Table 4.2

Run Number:

Run Number:



Tesoro Hawaii Corporation Page 1 of 1

91-325 Komohana Steet, Kapolei, HI 96707

Sample ID 803746

Unit CDU

Code Unit Fuel Oil

Sample Date 10/04/2010 06:00

Test Date 10/04/2010 05:05

Crude Name PYRENEES-DURI-ARAB_EX_LT-SAHARAN

Method Test Result Units

D4052 API Gravity 22.0 API

Meth19 GHG-Carbon by weight 87.3 wt%

Meth19 GHG-Gross Heating Value 19228.3 Btu/lb

Meth19 Fd Fuel Factor 9289.3 dSCF/MMBtu

D240 Calorific Value, Gross Btu/lb 19228.3 Btu/lb

D240 Calorific Value, Gross Btu/gal 1.4761 th/gal

D240 Calorific Value, G MMBtu/bbl 6.200 Btubbl

D7171 Hydrogen Content by NMR wt% 12.33 wt%

D5762 Nitrogen, Instrument Reading 18.4 mg/L

D5762 Dilution Factor 50x

D5762 Nitrogen, Total ppm 1063 ppm

D5762 Ambient Temperature 72 °F

D4294 Sulfur, wt% 0.261 wt%

D445 Viscosity @ 210 F, cSt 6.6 cSt

D445 Viscosity @ 210 F, SUS 47.8 SUS
METALS TEST

Gases: O2,CO2 & CO

Table 5.0.0-5.0.3 Calibration Data Sheets

Table 5.1.1 Run 1 Gases 

Table 5.1.2 Run 2 Gases

Table 5.1.3 Run 3 Gases
Client: Tesoro ETI: Rob Rusi

Location: Kapolei, HI Dave Wagner

Unit: Boiler #3 Paige Mendoza

Site: SG1102 Date: 10/07/10

ETI Job No: 10-1933 10/08/10

Instrument Information:

Instrument Channel Color Model

O2 - - ZRE

CO2 - - ZRE

SO2 - - -

NOx - - -

CO - - ZRE

HCs - - -

Recorders: - - -

Calibration Information:

Instrument Units Zero Span Range Gas Cyl. No.

O2 % N2 12.40 21.30 CC56348

O2 % N2 21.3 21.30 CC231540

CO2 % N2 12.5 21.00 CC56348

CO2 % N2 21 21.00 CC231540

SO2 ppmv - - - - -

SO2 ppmv - - - - -

NOx ppmv - - - - -

NOx ppmv - - - - -

CO ppmv N2 99.1 188.0 CC56781

CO ppmv N2 188.0 188.0 CC233240

HCs ppmv - - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - - -

0.5

Gas Flow (L/min)

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

CAI A0A6534T

- -

- -

CAI A0A6534T

- -

- -

Calibration Data

Table 5.0.0

Make Serial No.

CAI A0A6534T
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10

Location: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00

Mid-Range Gas 12.40 12.40

High-Range Gas 21.30 21.30

40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 12.4

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.40 12.40 0.00 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.40 12.40 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.40 12.50 0.10 0.10 0.47% 0.47%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.40 12.60 0.20 0.10 0.94% 0.47%

Pre

1

2

3

0.00

Table 5.0.1

O2 Analyzer Calibration Data

Direct Calibration Mode

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal) Difference from 

Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

0.00%

0.00 0.00%

0.00 0.00%
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10

Location: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00

Mid-Range Gas 12.50 12.50

High-Range Gas 21.00 21.00

40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 12.5

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.50 12.30 0.20 0.95%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.50 12.30 0.20 0.00 0.95% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.48% 0.48%

Upscale Gas 12.50 12.25 0.25 0.05 1.19% 0.24%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.24% 0.24%

Upscale Gas 12.50 12.23 0.27 0.02 1.29% 0.10%

Pre

1

2

3

0.00

Table 5.0.2

CO2 Analyzer Calibration Data

Direct Calibration Mode

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal) Difference from 

Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

0.00%

0.00 0.00%

0.00 0.00%
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10

Location: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.00 1.00

Mid-Range Gas 99.10 96.00

High-Range Gas 188.00 186.00

40 CFR 60 Method 10-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 99.1

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.0%

Upscale Gas 96.00 97.70 1.70 0.9%

Zero Gas 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.0%

Upscale Gas 96.00 97.70 1.70 0.00 0.9% 0.0%

Zero Gas 1.00 0.10 0.90 0.90 0.5% 0.5%

Upscale Gas 96.00 96.20 0.20 1.50 0.1% 0.8%

Zero Gas 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.3% 0.2%

Upscale Gas 96.00 95.10 0.90 1.10 0.5% 0.6%

Pre

1

2

3

1.00

Table 5.0.3

CO Analyzer Calibration Data

Direct Calibration Mode

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal) Difference from 

Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

0.5%

3.10 1.6%

2.00 1.1%
Client: Tesoro Run: 1

Site: SG1102 Start Time: 15:30

Date: 10/07/10 End Time: 18:30

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

Raw Avg: 6.2 11.0 - - 9.6 -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 6.20 11.18 - - 8.81 -

ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.1
Client: Tesoro Run: 2

Site: SG1102 Start Time: 8:45

Date: 10/08/10 End Time: 11:45

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

Raw Avg: 5.3 11.6 - - 3.0 -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 5.28 11.81 - - 2.52 -

ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.2
Client: Tesoro Run: 3

Site: SG1102 Start Time: 12:26

Date: 10/08/10 End Time: 15:26

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

Raw Avg: 5.5 11.4 - - 5.9 -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 5.43 11.64 - - 5.82 -

ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.3
METALS TEST

Flows

Table 6.0 Flows and Moisture Data Sheet 

Table 6.1 Lab Data 

Raw Data Sheets
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10

City: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

1 2 3

10/07/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

START TIME:............................................... 15:30 8:45 12:26

END TIME..................................................... 18:30 11:45 15:26

θ Sample Time, minutes 180 180 180

Stack Shape (Circle or Rectangle): Circle

Vm Volume of dry gas sampled, cf 83.766 85.316 85.583

Y Meter box calibration factor 1.008 1.008 1.008

Pbar Barometric pressure, inches Hg 29.90 29.87 29.91

Pstatic Stack static pressure, inches H2O -0.07 -0.06 -0.06

∆H Differential meter press, inches H2O 0.6008 0.6075 0.6138

Tm Meter temperature, degrees F 88.8 97.2 90.5

Vlc Volume of H2O collected, ml 212 230 230

%O2 Percent of oxygen in stack gas 6.20 5.28 5.43

%CO2 Percent carbon dioxide in stack gas 11.18 11.81 11.64

Cp Type-S pitot tube coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84

Ave. square root of pitot readings, (inches H2O)1/2 0.1723 0.1723 0.1743

Ts Stack temperature, degrees F 405.8 409.5 408.2

Ds Stack diameter, feet - CIRCLE 4.00 4.00 4.00

Ls, Ws Stack dimensions, feet - RECTANGLE NA NA NA

Dn Nozzle diameter, inches 0.434 0.434 0.436

An Nozzle area, ft2 0.001027 0.001027 0.001037

Calculated Values:

Vm(std) Meter corrected volume,dscf 81.302 81.477 82.839

Vw(std) Volume of water vapor,dscf 10.00 10.84 10.84

Bws Fraction of H2O vapor 0.1095 0.1174 0.1157

%N2 Percent nitrogen in stack gas 82.62 82.91 82.93

Md Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 30.04 30.10 30.08

Mw Wet molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 28.72 28.68 28.68

Ad Cross sectional area of stack, ft2 12.57 12.57 12.57

Ps Absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg 29.89 29.87 29.91

Vs Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec 12.43 12.47 12.59

Qstd Average stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm 5,086 5,032 5,105

I Percent isokinetic sampling 108.8 110.2 109.3

Flows and Moisture

Field Data

Table 6.0

Run Number

∆P avg
Client: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10

City: Kapolei, HI

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

1 2 3

Sample 131.00 125.00 121.00

Blank 0.68 0.68 0.68

Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60

Total, μg 130.32 124.32 120.32

Total, μg/ft3 1.603 1.526 1.452

Sample

Blank

Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30

Total, μg 0.15 0.15 0.15

Total, μg/ft3 0.00184 0.00184 0.00181

Sample 0.21 0.16 0.25

Blank 0.25 0.25 0.25

Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30

Total, μg 0.15 0.15 0.15

Total, μg/ft3 0.00184 0.00184 0.00181

Sample 2.60 1.70 1.60

Blank 0.86 0.86 0.86

Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60

Total, μg 1.74 0.84 0.74

Total, μg/ft3 0.0214 0.0103 0.0089

Sample 2.00 0.86 1.30

Blank 0.33 0.33 0.33

Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30

Total, μg 1.67 0.53 0.97

Total, μg/ft3 0.0205 0.0065 0.0117

Sample 1.10 1.00 1.00

Blank 0.42 0.42 0.42

Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60

Total, μg 0.68 0.58 0.58

Total, μg/ft3 0.00836 0.00712 0.00700

Sample 33.7 35.3 34.6

Blank 0.78 0.78 0.78

Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30

Total, μg 32.92 34.52 33.82

Total, μg/ft3 0.405 0.424 0.408

results ≤ 0 reported as 1/2 the detection limit

Lab Data

Method 29 Metals Testing

Table 6.1

Manganese, μg

Run Number

Lead, μg

Chromium, μg

Cadmium, μg 

Beryllium, μg

Arsenic, μg

Nickel, μg



TEST AMERICA LAB REPORT
880 Riverside Parkway West Sacramento, CA 95605 tel 916.373.5600 fax 916.372.1059 www.testamericainc.com

November 4, 2010 

TestAmerica Project Number: G0J150622 

PO/Contract: 10-1933 

Robert Rusi 

Emission Technologies 

15609 D Peterson Rd 

Burlington, WA 98233 

 

Dear Mr. Rusi, 

This report contains the analytical results for the samples received under chain of 

custody by TestAmerica on October 14, 2010. These samples are associated with 

your 10-1933 Tesoro project. 

The test results in this report meet all NELAC requirements for parameters that 

accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are 

noted in the case narrative. The case narrative is an integral part of this report. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (916) 374-4333. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Weidenfeld 

Project Manager 

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 1 of 25
Table of Contents

TestAmerica West Sacramento Project Number G0J150622 

 Case Narrative 

 Quality Assurance Program 

 Sample Description Information 

 Chain of Custody Documentation 

 AIR, M29 Metals by ICPMS 

 Samples: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 

 Sample Data Sheets 

 Method Blank Reports 

 Laboratory QC Reports 

 

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 2 of 25
Case Narrative

TestAmerica West Sacramento Project Number G0J150622

AIR, ICPMS, Metals 

The RPD for nickel in the duplicate analysis report is above the upper limit of 15. 

There are no additional anomalies associated with this project. 

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 3 of 25
TestAmerica Laboratories West Sacramento Certifications/Accreditations 

Certifying State Certificate # Certifying State Certificate # 

Alaska UST-055 New York* 11666 

Arizona AZ0708 Oregon* CA 200005 

Arkansas 88-0691 Pennsylvania 68-1272 

California* 01119CA South Carolina 87014 

Colorado NA Texas T104704399-08-TX 

Connecticut PH-0691 Utah* QUAN1 

Florida* E87570 Virginia 00178 

Georgia 960 Washington C1281 

Hawaii NA West Virginia 9930C, 334 

Illinois 200060 Wisconsin 998204680 

Kansas* E-10375 NFESC NA 

Louisiana* 30612 USACE NA 

Michigan 9947 USDA Foreign Plant 37-82605 

Nevada CA44 USDA Foreign Soil P330-09-00055 

New Jersey* CA005 US Fish & Wildlife LE148388-0 

New Mexico NA Guam 09-014r 

*NELAP accredited. A more detailed parameter list is available upon request. Updated 3/25/2009 

QC Parameter Definitions 

QC Batch: The QC batch consists of a set of up to 20 field samples that behave similarly (i.e., same matrix) 

and are processed using the same procedures, reagents, and standards at the same time. 

Method Blank: An analytical control consisting of all reagents, which may include internal standards and 

surrogates, and is carried through the entire analytical procedure. The method blank is used to define the level 

of laboratory background contamination.

Laboratory Control Sample and Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCS/LCSD): An aliquot 

of blank matrix spiked with known amounts of representative target analytes. The LCS (and LCSD as 

required) is carried through the entire analytical process and is used to monitor the accuracy of the analytical 

process independent of potential matrix effects. If an LCSD is performed, it may also be used to evaluate the 

precision of the process.

Duplicate Sample (DU): Different aliquots of the same sample are analyzed to evaluate the precision of an 

analysis.

Surrogates: Organic compounds not expected to be detected in field samples, which behave similarly to 

target analytes. These are added to every sample within a batch at a known concentration to determine the 

efficiency of the sample preparation and analytical process.

Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): An MS is an aliquot of a matrix fortified with 

known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to an entire analytical procedure in order to indicate the 

appropriateness of the method for a particular matrix. The percent recovery for the respective compound(s) is 

then calculated. The MSD is a second aliquot of the same matrix as the matrix spike, also spiked, in order to 

determine the precision of the method.

Isotope Dilution: For isotope dilution methods, isotopically labeled analogs (internal standards) of the native 

target analytes are spiked into the sample at time of extraction. These internal standards are used for 

quantitation, and monitor and correct for matrix effects. Since matrix effects on method performance can be 

judged by the recovery of these analogs, there is little added benefit of performing MS/MSD for these methods. 

MS/MSD are only performed for client or QAPP requirements.

Control Limits: The reported control limits are either based on laboratory historical data, method 

requirements, or project data quality objectives. The control limits represent the estimated uncertainty of the 

test results.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 4 of 25
Sample Summary 

TestAmerica West Sacramento Project Number G0J150622

 

WO# Sample # Client Sample ID Sampling Date Received Date

L8LC1 1 M29-R1-DIESEL 10/4/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LC1 1 M29-R1-DIESEL DUP 10/4/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LC3 2 M29-R2-DIESEL 10/4/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LC4 3 M29-R3-DIESEL 10/5/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LC5 4 M29-R1-KEROSENE 10/5/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LC6 5 M29-R2-KEROSENE 10/6/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LC7 6 M29-R3-KEROSENE 10/6/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LC8 7 M29-R1-1102 10/7/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LC9 8 M29-R2-1102 10/8/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LDC 9 M29-R3-1102 10/8/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

L8LDD 10 M29-BLANK 10/8/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM 

Notes(s): 

- The analytical results of the samples listed above are presented on the following pages. 

- All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.

- Results noted as “ND” were not detected at or above the stated limit.

- This report must not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.

- Results for the following parameters are never reported on a dry weight basis: color, corrosivity, density, flashpoint, 

ignitability, layers, odor, paint filter test, pH, porosity, pressure, reactivity, redox potential, specific gravity, spot tests, 

solids, solubility, temperature, viscosity, and weight.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 5 of 25
G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 6 of 25
G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 7 of 25
G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 8 of 25
G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 9 of 25
AIR, M29 Metals by ICPMS 

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 10 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-R1-DIESEL

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-001 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/04/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 0.92 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AA L8LC11AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 0.096 B 0.096 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AD L8LC11AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 1.4 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AE L8LC11AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 0.90 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AF L8LC11AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 0.89 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AG L8LC11AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 1.0 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AH L8LC11AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 11 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-R2-DIESEL

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-002 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/04/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 1.2 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AA L8LC31AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium Beryllium 0.17 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AC L8LC31AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 2.4 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AD L8LC31AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 1.8 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AE L8LC31AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 0.93 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AF L8LC31AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 1.7 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AG L8LC31AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 1.0 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AH L8LC31AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 12 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-R3-DIESEL

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-003 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/05/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 1.6 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AA L8LC41AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 0.13 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AD L8LC41AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 1.5 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AE L8LC41AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 0.78 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AF L8LC41AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 1.5 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AG L8LC41AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 0.59 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AH L8LC41AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 13 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-R1-KEROSENE

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-004 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/05/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 0.38 B,J 0.38 B,J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AA L8LC51AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 0.052 B 0.052 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AD L8LC51AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 1.4 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AE L8LC51AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 0.59 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AF L8LC51AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 0.50 B,J 0.50 B,J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AG L8LC51AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 0.47 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AH L8LC51AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 14 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-R2-KEROSENE

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-005 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/06/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 0.22 B,J 0.22 B,J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AA L8LC61AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 0.12 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AD L8LC61AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 1.2 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AE L8LC61AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 0.62 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AF L8LC61AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 0.39 B,J 0.39 B,J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AG L8LC61AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 0.59 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AH L8LC61AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 15 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-R3-KEROSENE

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-006 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/06/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 0.37 B,J 0.37 B,J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AA L8LC71AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 0.12 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AD L8LC71AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 1.2 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AE L8LC71AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 0.62 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AF L8LC71AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 0.93 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AG L8LC71AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 0.46 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AH L8LC71AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 16 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-R1-1102

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-007 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/07/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 131 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AA L8LC81AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 0.21 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AD L8LC81AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 2.6 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AE L8LC81AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 1.1 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AF L8LC81AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 33.7 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AG L8LC81AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 2.0 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AH L8LC81AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 17 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-R2-1102

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-008 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/08/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 125 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AA L8LC91AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 0.16 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AD L8LC91AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 1.7 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AE L8LC91AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 1.0 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AF L8LC91AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 35.3 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AG L8LC91AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 0.86 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AH L8LC91AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 18 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-R3-1102

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-009 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/08/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 121 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AA L8LDC1AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 0.25 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AD L8LDC1AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 1.6 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AE L8LDC1AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 1.0 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AF L8LDC1AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 34.6 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AG L8LDC1AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 1.3 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AH L8LDC1AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 19 of 25
Emission Technologies

Client Sample ID: M29-BLANK

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-010 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/08/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 0.68 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AA L8LDD1AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium Cadmium 0.25 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AD L8LDD1AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium Chromium 0.86 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AE L8LDD1AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese Manganese 0.42 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AF L8LDD1AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 0.78 J 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AG L8LDD1AG

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 0.33 J 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AH L8LDD1AH

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 20 of 25
QC DATA ASSOCIATION SUMMARY

G0J150622

Sample Preparation and Analysis Control Numbers

ANALYTICAL LEACH PREP

SAMPLE#_______ MATRIX _______ METHOD ________________ BATCH # _______ BATCH # _______ MS RUN# _______

001 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

002 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

003 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

004 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

005 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

006 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

007 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

008 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

009 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

010 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 21 of 25
METHOD BLANK REPORT

TOTAL Metals

Client Lot #...: Client Lot #...: G0J150622 Matrix.........: Matrix.........: AIR

REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK

PARAMETER _______________ RESULT _____________ LIMIT _________ UNITS __________ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER # ________

MB Lot-Sample #: MB Lot-Sample #: G0J280000-292 Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292

Arsenic Arsenic 0.34 B 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AA L88E21AA

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AC

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AD

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium ND 0.60 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AE

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 0.073 B 0.073 B 0.30 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AH L88E21AH

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AF

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 0.21 B 0.60 ug SW846 6020 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AG L88E21AG

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 22 of 25
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622 Matrix.........: Matrix.........: AIR

PERCENT RECOVERY RPD PREPARATION- PREPPARAMETER ___________ RECOVERY ________ LIMITS __________ RPD ____ LIMITS ______ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ BATCH # _______

Arsenic 90 (79 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

90 (79 - 110) 0.30 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium 88 (70 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

87 (70 - 110) 0.70 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium 90 (79 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

91 (79 - 110) 1.5 (0-16) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium 95 (84 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

95 (84 - 110) 0.19 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 92 (86 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

94 (86 - 110) 2.0 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese 96 (84 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

95 (84 - 110) 1.8 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 98 (86 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

96 (86 - 110) 2.2 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 23 of 25
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DATA REPORT

TOTAL Metals

Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622 Matrix.........: Matrix.........: AIR

SPIKE MEASURED PERCNT PREPARATION- PREP

PARAMETER ____________ AMOUNT _______ AMOUNT ________ UNITS ________ RECVRY ______ RPD ____ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ BATCH # _______

Arsenic 60.0 53.7 ug 90 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 53.9 ug 90 0.30 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium 60.0 52.8 ug 88 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 52.4 ug 87 0.70 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium 60.0 53.8 ug 90 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 54.6 ug 91 1.5 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium 60.0 57.3 ug 95 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 57.1 ug 95 0.19 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead 60.0 55.1 ug 92 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 56.2 ug 94 2.0 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese 60.0 57.8 ug 96 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 56.8 ug 95 1.8 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel 60.0 58.6 ug 98 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 57.3 ug 96 2.2 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 24 of 25
SAMPLE DUPLICATE EVALUATION REPORT

Metals

Client Lot #...: Client Lot #...: G0J150622 Work Order #...: Work Order #...: L8LC1-SMP Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR

L8LC1-DUP

Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/04/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10

DUPLICATE RPD PREPARATION- PREP

PARAM_____ RESULT ___________ RESULT ___________ UNITS ________ RPD _____ LIMIT _______ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ BATCH # _______

Arsenic SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001

0.92 J 0.94 ug 1.5 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Beryllium SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001

ND ND ug 0 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Cadmium SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001

0.096 B 0.090 B ug 6.1 (0-16) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Chromium SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001

1.4 1.7 ug 14 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Manganese SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001

0.90 0.95 ug 5.2 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Nickel SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001

0.89 J 1.4 ug 48 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

Lead SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001

1.0 J 1.0 ug 0.66 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

Dilution Factor: 1

NOTE(S): ___________________________________________________________________________________________

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.

J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 25 of 25
Quality Assurance/Quality Control

ETI QA Document

Hand Calculations

Gas Certifications

Meter Calibrations
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

Emission Technologies, Inc. continued success is an example of their pride taken in quality testing.

Analytical procedures and environmental measurement data are structured with a quality assurance 

program which equals or exceeds the minimum QA/QC requirements set forth by the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) for each applicable method.

ETI executes the following topics through every test project to ensure valid measurement data:

∗ Preventable Maintenance 

∗ Pre-test and Post-test Calibration

∗ Blanks and Spiked Samples

∗ Field System Checks

∗ QA/QC Matrix Tables

∗ Employment of QA/QC Officer

The following table is an activity matrix for Method 8 from the EPA Quality Assurance Handbook for Air 

Pollution Measurement Systems. By diligently following such activity matrix tables, Emission 

Technologies, Inc. reports justifiable, valid measurement data.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

TABLE 1.1 ACTIVITY MATRIX FOR PROCUREMENT OF APPARATUS & SUPPLIES

ACTION IF

FREQUENCY AND METHOD REQUIREMENTS

APPARATUS ACCEPTANCE LIMITS OF MEASUREMENT ARE NOT MET

Sampling

 Sampling probe Capable of 100o C Visually check; run Repair, return

 with heating (212o

 F) exit air at heating system to supplier,

 system flow rate of 20 L/min checkout or reject

Probe nozzle Stainless steel (316); Visually check before Reshape and

sharp, tapered, leading each test; use a sharpen, 

edge (angle ≤30o

); micrometer to measure return to the

difference between ID before field use supplier, or

measured ID’s ≤0.1 after each repair reject

mm (0.004 in.); no nicks,

dents, or corrosion;

uniquely identified

(Meth. 5, Sec. 3.4.2)

Pitot tube Type-S (Meth. 2, Calibrate according Repair or

Sec. 3.1.2); attached to Meth. 2, Sec. 3.1.2 return to

to probe with impact supplier

(high pressure) opening

plane even with or above

nozzle entry plane
TABLE 1.1 (CONTINUED)

ACTION IF

FREQUENCY AND METHOD REQUIREMENTS

APPARATUS ACCEPTANCE LIMITS OF MEASUREMENT ARE NOT MET

Differential Criteria in Meth. 2, Check against gauge- As above

pressure Sec. 3.1.2; agree oil manometer at a 

gauge within 5% of gauge- minimum of three

(manometer) oil manometer used points: [0.64(0.025),

to calibrate 12.7(0.5), 25.4(1.0)]

mm (in.) H20

Vacuum gauge 0-760 mm Hg range; Check against a Adjust or

+25 mm (1 in.) Hg mercury U-tube manometer return to

accuracy at 380 mm upon receipt supplier

(15 in.) Hg

Vacuum pump Capable of maintaining Check upon receipt Repair or

a flow rate of 0.03- for leaks and return to

0.05 m3

/ min (1-1.7 ft3/ capacity supplier

min) for pump inlet

vacuum of 380 mm (15

in.) Hg with pump outlet at 760 mm (29.92

in.) Hg; leak free at

380 mm (15 in.) Hg

Orifice meter ∆H @ of 46.74 +6.35 Visually check upon Repair, if

mm (1.84 +0.25 in.) receipt for damage; possible;

(recommended) calibrate against otherwise, 

wet test meter return to

supplier

Impingers Standard stock glass; Visually check upon Return to

pressure drop across receipt; check pressure supplier

impingers not excessive drop (Method 8, Sec. 3.7.1)

Filter holder Leak free (Method 8, Visually check before As above

Sec. 3.7.1) use

Filters Glass fiber without Manufacture’s Return to

organic binder guarantee that filters supplier and

designed to remove meet ASTM standard replace

99.95% (≤0.05% method D2986-71;

penetration) of 0.3-μm observe under light

dioctyl phthalate for defects

smoke particles
TABLE 1.1 (CONTINUED)

ACTION IF

FREQUENCY AND METHOD REQUIREMENTS

APPARATUS ACCEPTANCE LIMITS OF MEASUREMENT ARE NOT MET

Hydrogen 30% H2O2 reagent Upon receipt, check Replace or

peroxide grade or certified label for grade or return to supplier

ACS certification

Potassium KI reagent grade or As above As above

iodide certified ACS

Thorin 1-(o-arsonophenylazo)- Upon receipt, check As above

indicator 2-naphthol-3,6 disul- label for grade or

fonic acid disodium certification

salt, reagent grade or

certified ACS

Barium perchlor- Ba(ClO4)2 -3H20, - As above As above

ate trihydrate reagent grade or

solution certified ACS

Sulfuric acid H2SO4, 0.0100N + Certified by manufacturer, As above

solution 0.0002N or standardize against

0.0100N NaOH previously

standardized against

potassium acid phthalate

(primary standard grade)

NOx NOx to NO Before each field test; Repair

Chemiluminescence conversion efficiency Introduce a concentration

Analyzer ≥ 90% of 40-60 ppm NO2 to the

 analyzer in direct cal mode;

Calculate converter efficiency:

100

C

C Eff

V

Dir

NO2 = ×

_____________________________________________________________________________________


















API/NPRA Comments on Non-Continental Liquids Subcategory

July 15, 2011

ATTACHMENT 3
Tesoro Hawaii Refinery

SG-1102 Boiler

Engineering Tests for

Particulates and Metals 

Report Number: 10-1982

December 11-13, 2010

Prepared for:

Tesoro Hawaii Refinery

91-325 Komohana Street

Kapolei, HI 96707

Prepared by:

Emission Technologies, Inc.

15609 Peterson Road, Suite D

Burlington, WA 98233
INVOLVED PARTIES:

Contact:

Albert Alvarez

91-325 Komohana Street

Kapolei, HI 96707

Phone: (808) 547-3824

Fax: (808) 547-3868

E-mail: aalvarez@tsocorp.com

Emission Technologies, Inc.

Contact:

Rob Rusi

15609-D Peterson Rd.

Burlington, Washington 98233

Phone: (800) 507-9018

Phone: (360) 757-1210

Fax: (360) 757-1118

E-mail: eti@eti-usepa.com
REPORT TEXT

SUMMARIES

FIELD DATA

GASES: PM TEST

FIELD/LAB DATA

PARTICULATES

FIELD DATA

GASES: METALS TEST

FIELD/LAB DATA

METALS

TEST AMERICA 

LABORATORY REPORT

QUALITY ASSURANCE/

QUALITY CONTROL
Report Text

Introduction

Test Overview

Overview of Sampling Methods

Results and Reporting Conditions 

Process Overview 

Participants
Introduction:

Tesoro Hawaii Refinery (Tesoro) operates an 82 MMBtu/hr heat input steam generator, (SG-1102) 

which produces steam for refinery processes. At the time of the source test, the boiler was firing at 

32.3 MMBtu/hr based on stack flow rates and dry fuel factors. Emission Technologies Inc. (ETI) was 

contracted by Tesoro to provide some “in house” testing on the boiler for particulates (PM) and metals. 

The metals to be tested were arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, manganese, nickel and lead.

Test Overview:

ETI performed tests on the outlet (stack) of the SG-1102 on December 11th through the 13th. Table 1.0 

lists the overall sampling program used. Source tests for each parameter are specified following the 

standard EPA requirements listed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A.

Table 1.0

Field Sampling Program

Unit Parameter Test Method Number of Test 

Runs Time/Test

SG-1102 Sample Point 

Determination EPA Methods 1 1 -

SG-1102 Velocity and Flow EPA Method 2 6 60/192 minutes

SG-1102 O2 and CO2 EPA Method 3A 6 60/192 minutes

SG-1102 Moisture EPA Method 4 6 60/192 minutes

SG-1102 PM EPA Methods

5/202 3 60 minutes

SG-1102 Metals EPA Method 29 3 192 minutes
Overview of the Sampling Methods:

EPA Method 1 - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources

EPA Method 1 was used to aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or 

total volumetric flow rate from a stationary source. A measurement site where the effluent 

stream was flowing in a known direction was selected, and the cross-section of the stack was 

divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point was then located within each of these 

equal areas. The sampling traverse points for Method 1 need only be determined once.

EPA Method 2 - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate

The average gas velocity in each stack was determined from the gas density and from 

measurement of the average velocity head with a Type S (Stausscheibe) or reverse type Pitot 

tube. 

EPA Method 4 – Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas

A sample of the gas stream was extracted at a constant rate and then condensed and metered 

using an EPA Method 5 sample train. The weight gain of moisture condensed was determined 

gravimetrically. The moisture content is measured as grams of water collected and referenced 

to the amount of dry gas sampled to get the fractional water content of the stack gas.

EPA Method 5/202 - Determination of Particulate and Condensable Particulate Matter 

Particulate matter was withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber 

filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 248 ± 25°F (120 ± 14°C). Particulate matter 

that was deposited on the nozzle, probe and front half of the filer holder were rinsed with 

acetone and collected in sample bottles. The acetone was then evaporated off at the laboratory 

and desiccated for 24 hours. The particulate mass from the rinse and filter were determined 

gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water.

The condensable particulate matter (CPM), back half fraction, is the material that condenses 

after passing through the filter and was analyzed using Method 202 (OTM28). The method uses 

a Method 5 sampling train with the addition of a condenser, a water dropout impinger and a 

modified Greenburg-Smith impinger (both dry) followed by a Teflon CPM filter. The impinger 

contents were immediately purged after the run for one hour with nitrogen to remove dissolved 

sulfur dioxide gases. The CPM filter was extracted with water and methylene chloride. The 

impingers are recovered, rinsed and the organic and aqueous fractions are separated using 
methylene chloride. The organic and aqueous fractions are then taken to dryness and residues 

weighed. The total of both fractions represents the CPM.

EPA Method 3A - Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources 

(Instrumental)

Method 3A uses electronic gas analyzers for the measurement of O2 and CO2. The sampled gas 

was continuously extracted from the stack through a heated probe/filter assembly to a moisture 

knock-out that removed water from the stack gas. The dry stack gas was transported from the 

outlet of the moisture knock-out through a Teflon line to a mobile test trailer containing the gas 

analyzer. Inside the test trailer the stack gas passed through a vacuum/pressure pump to a gas 

manifold. The sampled gas was divided into separate streams through stainless steel metering 

valves and glass flow meters. The analyzer detected the concentration of analyte gas within the 

sample and produced an output electrical signal proportional to analyte gas concentration. The 

electrical signals were recorded on a laptop computer. Instrument calibrations (zero and span 

checks) were performed as per 40 CFR 60. Sampling system calibration (external calibration) 

was accomplished by sending EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases to a location ahead of the filter 

assembly. Analyzer calibration and linearity determinations (internal calibration) were 

accomplished by sending the EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases directly to the analyzers. All 

components of the gas sampling and calibration system were constructed of Teflon, 316 

stainless steel, or glass. The sample vacuum/pressure pump head was constructed of 316 

stainless steel, Viton O-rings, and a Teflon coated diaphragm.

EPA Method 29 – Multiple Metals

A stack sample was withdrawn isokinetically from the source, particulate emissions were 

collected in the probe and on a heated filter, and gaseous emissions were then collected in an 

aqueous acidic solution of hydrogen peroxide (analyzed for all metals). Samples were sent to 

an outside laboratory for analysis. The recovered samples were digested and appropriate 

fractions were analyzed for arsenic (As), beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), Lead 

(Pb), Manganese (Mn) and nickel (Ni) were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-mass 

spectroscopy (ICP-MS).

Results and Reporting Conditions

The results of the pollutant emission tests are presented in Section 2. The units of reporting for the 

gases are parts per million dry volume (ppmdv) and pounds per hour (lb/hr). The units of reporting for 
the gases are parts per million dry volume (ppmdv), pounds per hour (lb/hr) and pounds per million 

Btu (lb/MMBtu). Particulates are reported in units of milligrams (mg), grains per dry standard cubic 

foot (gr/dscf), gr/dscf corrected to 7% oxygen, lb/hr and lb/MMBtu. Metals are reported in units of 

micrograms per cubic foot ( g/cf) and lb/hr. The emission rates presented in the summaries are 

referenced to EPA standard conditions of 29.92 inches of mercury (“Hg) and 68 oF.
Process Overview:

The boiler, which is fired on refinery fuel gas (RFG), fuel oil or a combination of both fuels, is rated at 

82 MMBtu/hr heat input. The unit was running on fuel oil during the test.

Figure 1 shows a conceptual diagram of the sampling location on the SG-1102.

SG- 1102

ETI Test 

Trailer

Figure 1

Participants:

ETI:

Mr. Scott Chesnut, Project Manager

Mr. David Wagner, Field Technician

Mr. Paige Mendoza, Field Technician

Ms. Wendy Pounds, Quality Assurance Supervisor

Tesoro:

Mr. Albert Alvarez served as Project Manager for Tesoro Hawaii Refinery.
Summaries

Table 2.0.1 Summary of Gases; 12/11-12/10

Table 2.0.2 Summary of Metals; 12/11-12/10

Table 2.1.1 Summary of Gases; 12/13/10

Table 2.1.2 Summary of Particulates; 12/13/10
Client Tesoro Date: 12/13/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Unit: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

1 2 3

1 2 3

Percent

Percent 10.26 10.36

CO2

6.93

10.47 10.36

6.90 7.00 6.90

Run Number Average

Summary

Table 2.0.1

Run Number O2 Average
Client Tesoro Date: 12/13/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Unit: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1982

RUN #1

Net Wt. gr/dscf

(mg) @ 7% O2

FRONT HALF:

Probe & Nozzle:............................ 4.2 0.00170 0.00150 0.00169 0.00334 0.074

Filter:............................................ 1.0 0.00040 0.00035 0.00040 0.00079 0.017

Totals:............................................ 5.2 0.00210 0.00185 0.00209 0.00413 0.091

BACK HALF:

Inorganic:...................................... 111.9 0.04524 0.03996 0.04492 0.08894 1.957

Organic:........................................ 2.7 0.00109 0.00096 0.00108 0.00214 0.047

Totals:............................................ 114.6 0.04633 0.04092 0.04600 0.09108 2.004

TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 119.8 0.0484 0.0428 0.0481 0.09521 2.095

RUN #2

Net Wt. gr/dscf

(mg) @ 7% O2

FRONT HALF:

Probe & Nozzle:............................ 5.4 0.00288 0.00256 0.00288 0.00570 0.102

Filter:............................................ 0.7 0.00037 0.00033 0.00037 0.00073 0.013

Totals:............................................ 6.1 0.00325 0.00289 0.00325 0.00643 0.115

BACK HALF:

Inorganic:...................................... 51.9 0.02769 0.02459 0.02769 0.05483 0.983

Organic:........................................ 2.8 0.00149 0.00132 0.00149 0.00295 0.053

Totals:............................................ 54.7 0.02918 0.02591 0.02918 0.05778 1.036

TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 60.8 0.03243 0.02880 0.03243 0.06421 1.151

RUN #3

Net Wt. gr/dscf

(mg) @ 7% O2

FRONT HALF:

Probe & Nozzle:............................ 6.0 0.00297 0.00263 0.00295 0.00584 0.113

Filter:............................................ 0.0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.000

Totals:............................................ 6.0 0.00297 0.00263 0.00295 0.00584 0.113

BACK HALF:

Inorganic:...................................... 96.2 0.04757 0.04210 0.04723 0.09352 1.805

Organic:........................................ 2.0 0.00099 0.00088 0.00098 0.00195 0.038

Totals:............................................ 98.2 0.04856 0.04298 0.04821 0.09547 1.843

TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 104.2 0.05153 0.04561 0.05116 0.10131 1.956

Net Wt. gr/dscf

AVERAGES FOR ALL RUNS (mg) @ 7% O2

FRONT HALF: 5.8 0.0028 0.0025 0.0028 0.00547 0.106

BACK HALF: 89.2 0.0414 0.0366 0.0411 0.08144 1.628

TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):........ 94.9 0.0441 0.0391 0.0439 0.08691 1.734

Summary - Method 5 Particulate

Table 2.0.2

Particulate Results:

gr/scf lb/hr

gr/scf lb/hr

Particulate Results: gr/dscf

gr/dscf

lb/hr

Particulate Results: gr/dscf gr/scf lb/hr

Particulate Results:

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

gr/dscf gr/scf
Client Tesoro Date: 12/11/10

Location: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10

Unit: Boiler #3

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

10/07/10 10/08/10 10/08/10

1 2 3

1 2 3

Percent 10.67 10.56 10.25 10.49

Percent 6.30 6.42 6.77 6.50

CO2

Run Number Average

Summary

Table 2.1.1

O2

Run Number Average
Client: Tesoro Date : 12/11/10

City: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

12/11/10 12/12/10 12/12/10

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.206 0.163 0.117 0.162

lb/hr 0.00012 0.00010 0.00007 0.00010

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.00302 0.00167 0.00175 0.00215

lb/hr 0.0000018 0.0000010 0.0000010 0.0000013

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.03325 0.01837 0.02041 0.02401

lb/hr 0.0000197 0.0000113 0.0000119 0.0000143

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.0242 0.0479 0.0210 0.0310

lb/hr 0.0000144 0.0000294 0.0000122 0.0000187

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.0516 0.1454 0.0063 0.06777

lb/hr 0.0000306 0.0000892 0.0000037 0.0000412

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

0.01773 0.01425 0.01493 0.01564

lb/hr 0.0000105 0.0000087 0.0000087 0.0000093

1 2 3 Average

μg/ft3

1.104 0.976 0.669 0.916

lb/hr 0.00066 0.00060 0.00039 0.00055

Nickel Run Number

Manganese Run Number

Cadmium

Chromium Run Number

Lead Run Number

Run Number

Run Number

Summary

Table 2.1.2

Run Number Arsenic

Beryllium

Method 29 Metals Testing
METALS TEST

Gases: O2 & CO2 

Table 3.0.0-3.0.3 Calibration Data Sheets

Table 3.1.1 Run 1 Gases

Table 3.1.2 Run 2 Gases

Table 3.1.3 Run 3 Gases
Client: Tesoro ETI: Scott Chesnut

Location: Kapolei, HI Dave Wagner

Unit: Boiler Paige Mendoza

Site: 1102 Fuel: Fuel Oil

Date: 12/13/10 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Instrument Information:

Instrument Channel Color Model

O2 - - ZRE

CO2 - - ZRE

SO2 - - -

NOx - - -

CO - - -

HCs - - -

Recorders: - - -

Calibration Information:

Instrument Units Zero Span Range Gas Cyl. No.

O2 % N2 12.40 21.30 CC56348

O2 % N2 21.3 21.30 CC231540

CO2 % N2 12.5 21.00 CC56348

CO2 % N2 21 21.00 CC231540

SO2 ppmv - - - -

SO2 ppmv - - - -

NOx ppmv - - - -

NOx ppmv - - - -

CO ppmv - - - -

CO ppmv - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - -

-

-

-

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

-

-

-

-

-

-

Gas Flow (L/min)

-

CAI

CAI

-

- -

Calibration Data

Table 3.0.0

Serial No.

A0A6534T

Make

A0A6534T

- -

-

-

-

-
Client: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

 Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.0 0.0

Mid-Range Gas 12.4 12.3

High-Range Gas 21.3 21.1

40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 12.4

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.05%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.47%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.47% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.47% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.5% 0.0%

Pre

1

2

Table 3.0.1

0.20

O2 Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal)

3

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

Direct Calibration Mode

0.00%

0.47%

0.94%

 Difference from 

Cylinder Value

0.00

0.10
Client: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

 Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.0 0.01

Mid-Range Gas 12.5 12.3

High-Range Gas 21.0 21.2

40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 12.5

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

3

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

Direct Calibration Mode

0.05%

0.95%

0.95%

 Difference from 

Cylinder Value

0.01

0.20

Pre

1

2

Table 3.0.2

0.20

CO2 Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal)
Client: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

 Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.0 0.81

Mid-Range Gas - 96.0

High-Range Gas - 185.0

40 CFR 60 Method 10-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid -

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.81 0.20 0.61 #VALUE!

Upscale Gas 96.00 95.30 0.70 #VALUE!

Zero Gas 0.81 0.36 0.45 0.16 #VALUE! #VALUE!

Upscale Gas 96.00 95.80 0.20 0.50 #VALUE! #VALUE!

Zero Gas 0.81 0.45 0.36 0.09 #VALUE! #VALUE!

Upscale Gas 96.00 96.10 0.10 0.30 #VALUE! #VALUE!

Zero Gas 0.81 0.36 0.45 0.09 #VALUE! #VALUE!

Upscale Gas 96.00 95.40 0.60 0.70 #VALUE! #VALUE!

Pre

1

2

Table 3.0.3

#VALUE!

CO Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal)

3

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

Direct Calibration Mode

#VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!

 Difference from 

Cylinder Value

0.81

#VALUE!
Client: Tesoro Run: 1

Site: 1102 Start Time: 7:45

Date: 12/13/10 End Time: 8:44

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

7:45 7.0 10.3 - - - -

7:46 6.9 10.3 - - - -

7:47 6.9 10.3 - - - -

7:48 7.0 10.2 - - - -

7:49 6.9 10.2 - - - -

7:50 6.9 10.3 - - - -

7:51 6.9 10.2 - - - -

7:52 6.9 10.2 - - - -

7:53 6.9 10.2 - - - -

7:54 6.9 10.2 - - - -

7:55 6.9 10.2 - - - -

7:56 6.9 10.2 - - - -

7:57 6.9 10.2 - - - -

7:58 6.9 10.2 - - - -

7:59 7.0 10.1 - - - -

8:00 6.9 10.2 - - - -

8:01 6.9 10.2 - - - -

8:02 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:03 6.9 10.2 - - - -

8:04 6.9 10.2 - - - -

8:05 6.9 10.2 - - - -

8:06 6.9 10.2 - - - -

8:07 6.9 10.2 - - - -

8:08 7.0 10.1 - - - -

8:09 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:10 6.9 10.2 - - - -

8:11 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:12 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:13 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:14 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:15 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:16 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:17 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:18 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:19 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:20 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:21 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:22 7.0 10.1 - - - -

8:23 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:24 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:25 7.0 10.1 - - - -

8:26 7.0 10.1 - - - -

8:27 7.0 10.1 - - - -

8:28 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:29 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:30 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:31 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:32 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:33 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:34 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:35 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:36 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:37 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:38 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:39 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:40 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:41 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:42 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:43 6.9 10.1 - - - -

8:44 6.9 10.1 - - - -

Raw Avg: 6.9 10.1 - - - -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 6.90 10.26 - - - -

Table 3.1.1

ETI Field Data
Client: Tesoro Run: 2

Site: 1102 Start Time: 9:21

Date: 12/13/10 End Time: 10:20

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

9:21 7.1 10.1 - - - -

9:22 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:23 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:24 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:25 6.9 10.3 - - - -

9:26 6.9 10.3 - - - -

9:27 6.9 10.3 - - - -

9:28 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:29 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:30 6.9 10.3 - - - -

9:31 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:32 6.9 10.2 - - - -

9:33 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:34 6.9 10.3 - - - -

9:35 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:36 6.9 10.3 - - - -

9:37 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:38 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:39 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:40 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:41 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:42 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:43 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:44 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:45 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:46 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:47 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:48 7.0 10.3 - - - -

9:49 6.9 10.3 - - - -

9:50 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:51 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:52 7.0 10.3 - - - -

9:53 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:54 7.0 10.3 - - - -

9:55 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:56 7.1 10.2 - - - -

9:57 7.0 10.2 - - - -

9:58 7.0 10.3 - - - -

9:59 7.0 10.2 - - - -

10:00 7.1 10.2 - - - -

10:01 7.1 10.2 - - - -

10:02 7.0 10.2 - - - -

10:03 7.1 10.2 - - - -

10:04 7.0 10.2 - - - -

10:05 7.0 10.2 - - - -

10:06 7.0 10.2 - - - -

10:07 7.0 10.3 - - - -

10:08 7.0 10.3 - - - -

10:09 7.1 10.2 - - - -

10:10 7.1 10.2 - - - -

10:11 7.0 10.2 - - - -

10:12 7.0 10.3 - - - -

10:13 7.0 10.2 - - - -

10:14 7.0 10.3 - - - -

10:15 7.0 10.3 - - - -

10:16 7.0 10.3 - - - -

10:17 7.0 10.3 - - - -

10:18 7.0 10.3 - - - -

10:19 7.0 10.3 - - - -

10:20 7.0 10.3 - - - -

Raw Avg: 7.0 10.2 - - - -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 7.00 10.36 - - - -

Table 3.1.2

ETI Field Data
Client: Tesoro Run: 3

Site: 1102 Start Time: 11:02

Date: 12/13/10 End Time: 12:01

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

11:02 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:03 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:04 7.0 10.2 - - - -

11:05 7.0 10.2 - - - -

11:06 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:07 7.0 10.2 - - - -

11:08 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:09 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:10 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:11 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:12 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:13 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:14 7.0 10.2 - - - -

11:15 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:16 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:17 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:18 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:19 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:20 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:21 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:22 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:23 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:24 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:25 7.0 10.3 - - - -

11:26 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:27 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:28 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:29 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:30 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:31 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:32 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:33 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:34 6.9 10.4 - - - -

11:35 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:36 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:37 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:38 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:39 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:40 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:41 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:42 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:43 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:44 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:45 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:46 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:47 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:48 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:49 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:50 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:51 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:52 6.9 10.4 - - - -

11:53 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:54 6.8 10.4 - - - -

11:55 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:56 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:57 6.8 10.3 - - - -

11:58 6.9 10.3 - - - -

11:59 6.8 10.4 - - - -

12:00 6.8 10.4 - - - -

12:01 6.8 10.4 - - - -

Raw Avg: 6.9 10.3 - - - -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 6.90 10.47 - - - -

Table 3.1.3

ETI Field Data
METALS TEST

Flows

Table 4.0 Flows and Moisture Data Sheet 

Table 4.1 Lab Data 

Table 4.2 Fuel Data

Raw Data Sheets
Client: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Unit: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1982

1 2 3

Run Start Time: 7:45 9:21 11:02

Run Finish Time: 8:49 10:25 12:06

θ Sample Time, minutes 64 64 64

Stack Shape (Circle or Rectangle):

Vm Dry Gas Meter Reading,dcf .................. ...........INITIAL: 39.545 78.665 108.968

FINAL: 78.265 108.426 141.195

Vm Volume of dry gas sampled, dcf 38.720 29.761 32.227

Y Meter box calibration factor 1.008 1.008 1.008

Pbar Barometric pressure, inches Hg 30.02 30.03 30.02

Pstatic Stack static pressure, inches H2O -0.07 -0.06 -0.06

∆H Differential meter press, inches H2O 1.0323 0.7174 0.8125

Tm Meter temperature, degrees F 84.2 91.8 93.7

Vlc Volume of H2O collected, ml 106.8 77.0 85.7

%O2 Percent of oxygen in stack gas 6.90 7.00 6.90

%CO2 Percent carbon dioxide in stack gas 10.26 10.36 10.47

Cp Type-S pitot tube coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84

Ave. square root of pitot readings, (inches H2O)1/2 0.1700 0.1384 0.1482

Ts Stack temperature, degrees F 390.8 384.1 382.8

Ds Stack diameter, feet - CIRCLE 4.00 4.00 4.00

Ls, Ws Stack dimensions, feet - RECTANGLE

Dn Nozzle diameter, inches 0.501 0.501 0.501

An Nozzle area, ft2 0.001369 0.001369 0.001369

Calculated Values:

Vm(std) Meter corrected volume,dscf 38.091 28.861 31.142

Vw(std) Volume of water vapor,dscf 5.036 3.631 4.041

Bws Fraction of H2O vapor 0.1168 0.1118 0.1149

Bws/sat Fraction of H2O vapor at saturated conditions 7.9243 7.4641 7.3804

%N2 Percent nitrogen in stack gas 82.84 82.64 82.63

Md Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 29.92 29.94 29.95

Mw Wet molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 28.53 28.61 28.58

Ad Cross sectional area of stack, ft2 12.57 12.57 12.57

Ps Absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg 30.01 30.03 30.02

Vs Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec 12.17 9.85 10.55

Qstd Average stack volumetric flowrate, wscfm 5,713 4,664 5,002

Qstd Average stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm 5,046 4,143 4,427

I Percent isokinetic sampling 108.4 100.0 101.0

Circle

Table 4.0

Flows and Moisture

Field Data

Run Number:

∆P avg
Client: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10

Location: Kapolei, HI

Unit: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1982

PARTICULATE LABORATORY DATA:

1 2 3

1.9839 1.9822 1.9792

1.9787 1.9758 1.9722

Blank acetone weight, g............................................. 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010

0.0042 0.0054 0.0060

0.3706 0.3662 0.3622

0.3696 0.3655 0.3605

0.0010 0.0007 0.0000

TOTAL FRONT HALF PARTICULATE, g: 0.0052 0.0061 0.0060

1 2 3

2.1443 2.0263 2.0772 1.8932

1.9716 1.9735 1.9733 1.8934

0.0608 0.0009 0.0077

0.1119 0.0519 0.0962 0

1.9848 1.9663 1.9492 1.9712

1.9819 1.9633 1.9470 1.9710

Blank methylene chloride weight, g.............................. 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002

0.0027 0.0028 0.0020 0.0002

Vt -Volume of NH4OH titrant, ml............................ 35.70 0.50 4.50

TOTAL BACK HALF PARTICULATE, g: 0.1146 0.0547 0.0982

Run Number:

Laboratory Data

Table 4.1

Run Number:

BACK HALF OF TRAIN

FRONT HALF OF TRAIN

Filter Wt.

Final weight, g:.....................................................................

Tare weight, g:.......................................................................

Weight gain, g:........................................................

Inorganic:

Final weight, g:.....................................................................

Tare weight, g:.................................................................

Weight gain, g:................................................................

Probe/Nozzle Wash Residue Wt .

Final weight, g:.....................................................................

Tare weight, g:.......................................................................

Weight gain, g:........................................................

Mc - Mass of NH4

+

 added to sample, g:.................................

TOTAL PARTICULATE, g: 0.1198 0.0608 0.1042

Organic:

Final weight, g:.....................................................................

Tare weight, g:.................................................................

Weight gain, g:....................................................................
Unit: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10

Client: Kapolei, HI Fuel: Fuel Oil

Location: Boiler

Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Fuel Data/Ambient Conditions 1 2 3

Qf Fuel flow rate, scfm - - -

FBTU Fuel heating value - gross Btu/lb 19,688 19,688 19,688

FO2 O2 F-factor, dscf/MMBtu 9,218 9,218 9,218

%O2 Average percent of oxygen in stack gas 6.90 7.00 6.90

lb/hr CO2 emissions from stack - - -

Calculated Values: 1 2 3

Qstd, (Ave stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm) - - -

Fuel Flow (MMBtu/hr) - - -

M-19 Stack Flow

Table 4.2

Run Number:

Run Number:
PARTICULATES TEST

Gases: O2 & CO2

Table 5.0.0-5.0.3 Calibration Data Sheets

Table 5.1.1 Run 1 Gases 

Table 5.1.2 Run 2 Gases

Table 5.1.3 Run 3 Gases
Client: Tesoro ETI: Scott Chesnut

Location: Kapolei, HI Dave Wagner

Unit: Boiler #3 Paige Mendoza

Site: SG1102 Date: 12/11/10

ETI Job No: 10-1968 12/12/10

Instrument Information:

Instrument Channel Color Model

O2 - - ZRE

CO2 - - ZRE

SO2 - - -

NOx - - -

CO - - -

HCs - - -

Recorders: - - -

Calibration Information:

Instrument Units Zero Span Range Gas Cyl. No.

O2 % N2 12.40 21.30 CC56348

O2 % N2 21.3 21.30 CC231540

CO2 % N2 12.5 21.00 CC56348

CO2 % N2 21 21.00 CC231540

SO2 ppmv - - - -

SO2 ppmv - - - -

NOx ppmv - - - -

NOx ppmv - - - -

CO ppmv - - - -

CO ppmv - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - - -

HCs ppmv - - - - -

-

-

- -

-

Gas Flow (L/min)

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

-

-

-

- -

- -

- -

-

CAI A0A6534T

-

Calibration Data

Table 5.0.0

Make Serial No.

CAI A0A6534T
Client: Tesoro Date: 12/11/10

Location: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00

Mid-Range Gas 12.40 12.40

High-Range Gas 21.30 21.38

40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 12.4

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.05%

Upscale Gas 12.40 12.38 0.02 0.09%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.19% 0.14%

Upscale Gas 12.40 12.38 0.02 0.00 0.09% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.09% 0.09%

Upscale Gas 12.40 12.28 0.12 0.10 0.56% 0.47%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05% 0.05%

Upscale Gas 12.40 12.25 0.15 0.03 0.70% 0.14%

Pre

1

2

3

0.00

Table 5.0.1

O2 Analyzer Calibration Data

Direct Calibration Mode

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal) Difference from 

Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

0.00%

0.00 0.00%

0.08 0.38%
Client: Tesoro Date: 12/11/10

Location: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

Cylinder 

Value 

(ppmdv)

Calibration 

Response 

(ppmdv)

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00

Mid-Range Gas 12.50 12.50

High-Range Gas 21.00 21.10

40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0

Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference 

Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value

Upscale Gas = Mid 12.5

System Bias and 

Calibration Drift 

Assessments Run

Direct - 

System 

Difference

Pre - Post 

System 

Response System Bias

Calibration 

Drift

Zero Gas 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.19%

Upscale Gas 12.50 12.41 0.09 0.43%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.29% 0.10%

Upscale Gas 12.50 12.42 0.08 0.01 0.38% 0.05%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.24% 0.05%

Upscale Gas 12.50 12.42 0.08 0.00 0.38% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.29% 0.05%

Upscale Gas 12.50 12.43 0.07 0.01 0.33% 0.05%

Pre

1

2

3

0.00

Table 5.0.2

CO2 Analyzer Calibration Data

Direct Calibration Mode

3-Point Linearity Check 

(Internal Cal) Difference from 

Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration 

Response (ppmdv) 

Direct System

Difference (% of 

Calibration Span)

0.00%

0.00 0.00%

0.10 0.48%
Client: Tesoro Run: 1

Site: SG1102 Start Time: 16:30

Date: 12/11/10 End Time: 19:30

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

Raw Avg: 6.3 10.6 - - - -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 6.30 10.67 - - - -

ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.1
Client: Tesoro Run: 2

Site: SG1102 Start Time: 8:45

Date: 12/12/10 End Time: 11:45

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

Raw Avg: 6.4 10.5 - - - -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 6.42 10.56 - - - -

ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.2
Client: Tesoro Run: 2

Site: SG1102 Start Time: 8:45

Date: 12/12/10 End Time: 11:45

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

Raw Avg: 6.4 10.5 - - - -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 6.42 10.56 - - - -

ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.2
Client: Tesoro Run: 3

Site: SG1102 Start Time: 12:26

Date: 12/12/10 End Time: 15:26

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Component: O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs

Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv

Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average:

Measurement Time O2 CO2 SO2 NOx CO HCs 

Raw Avg: 6.7 10.2 - - - -

Bias Corrected Emissions:

Average: 6.77 10.25 - - - -

ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.3
PARTICULATES TEST

Flows

Table 6.0 Flows and Moisture Data Sheet 

Table 6.1 Lab Data 

Raw Data Sheets
Client: Tesoro Date: 12/11/10

City: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

1 2 3

12/11/10 12/12/10 12/12/10

START TIME:............................................... 16:30 7:53 11:25

END TIME..................................................... 19:42 11:05 14:37

θ Sample Time, minutes 192 192 192

Stack Shape (Circle or Rectangle): Circle

Vm Volume of dry gas sampled, cf 50.722 92.524 89.519

Y Meter box calibration factor 1.008 1.008 1.008

Pbar Barometric pressure, inches Hg 29.93 29.99 29.99

Pstatic Stack static pressure, inches H2O -0.06 -0.05 -0.06

∆H Differential meter press, inches H2O 0.2855 0.7574 0.6918

Tm Meter temperature, degrees F 84.6 90.5 98.0

Vlc Volume of H2O collected, ml 129.5 198.7 203.0

%O2 Percent of oxygen in stack gas 6.30 6.42 6.77

%CO2 Percent carbon dioxide in stack gas 10.67 10.56 10.25

Cp Type-S pitot tube coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84

Ave. square root of pitot readings, (inches H2O)1/2 0.1501 0.1529 0.1456

Ts Stack temperature, degrees F 385.8 386.1 383.8

Ds Stack diameter, feet - CIRCLE 4.00 4.00 4.00

Ls, Ws Stack dimensions, feet - RECTANGLE NA NA NA

Dn Nozzle diameter, inches 0.385 0.484 0.484

An Nozzle area, ft2 0.000808 0.001278 0.001278

Calculated Values:

Vm(std) Meter corrected volume,dscf 49.621 89.828 85.729

Vw(std) Volume of water vapor,dscf 6.11 9.37 9.57

Bws Fraction of H2O vapor 0.1096 0.0945 0.1004

%N2 Percent nitrogen in stack gas 83.03 83.02 82.98

Md Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 29.96 29.95 29.91

Mw Wet molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 28.65 28.82 28.71

Ad Cross sectional area of stack, ft2 12.57 12.57 12.57

Ps Absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg 29.93 29.99 29.99

Vs Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec 10.71 10.86 10.35

Qstd Average stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm 4,491 4,639 4,404

I Percent isokinetic sampling 90 99 100

Flows and Moisture

Field Data

Table 6.0

Run Number

∆P avg
Client: Tesoro Date: 12/11/10

City: Kapolei, HI

Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

1 2 3

Sample 10.40 14.80 10.20

Blank 0.18 0.18 0.18

Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60

Total, μg 10.22 14.62 10.02

Total, μg/ft3 0.206 0.163 0.117

Sample 0.00 0.00 0.00

Blank 0.00 0.00 0.00

Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30

Total, μg 0.15 0.15 0.15

Total, μg/ft3 0.00302 0.00167 0.00175

Sample 2.00 2.00 2.10

Blank 0.35 0.35 0.35

Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30

Total, μg 1.65 1.65 1.75

Total, μg/ft3 0.03325 0.01837 0.02041

Sample 1.90 5.00 2.50

Blank 0.70 0.70 0.70

Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60

Total, μg 1.20 4.30 1.80

Total, μg/ft3 0.0242 0.0479 0.0210

Sample 2.90 13.40 0.88

Blank 0.34 0.34 0.34

Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30

Total, μg 2.56 13.06 0.54

Total, μg/ft3 0.0516 0.1454 0.0063

Sample 1.20 1.60 1.60

Blank 0.32 0.32 0.32

Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30

Total, μg 0.88 1.28 1.28

Total, μg/ft3 0.01773 0.01425 0.01493

Sample 55.2 88.1 57.8

Blank 0.41 0.41 0.41

Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60

Total, μg 54.79 87.69 57.39

Total, μg/ft3 1.104 0.976 0.669

results ≤ 0 reported as 1/2 the detection limit

Beryllium, μg

Arsenic, μg

Nickel, μg

Lab Data

Method 29 Metals Testing

Table 6.1

Manganese, μg

Run Number

Lead, μg

Chromium, μg

Cadmium, μg 
TEST AMERICA LAB REPORT
Quality Assurance/Quality Control

ETI QA Document

Hand Calculations

Gas Certifications

Meter Calibrations
API/NPRA Comments on Non-Continental Liquids Subcategory

July 15, 2011

ATTACHMENT 4 (see Excel Spreadsheet in July 15, 2011 email from Matt Todd)
API/NPRA Comments on Non-Continental Liquids Subcategory

July 15, 2011

ATTACHMENT 5


API/NPRA Comments on Non-Continental Liquids Subcategory

July 15, 2011

ATTACHMENT 6