alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, of The First Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donna T. Rutland, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Dee Dee LoweryName:

Dee Dee LoweryTitle:

Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:

8-11-06


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The First Bancshares, Inc., and will be retained by The First
Bancshares, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 76-6649.

#### Jones *v.*Indiana.

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.
#### James L. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-51.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 17, 1972.

*221Michael B. Piper, St. Petersburg, and Carleton L. Weidemeyer, of Wightman, Rowe, Weidemeyer & Federico, Clear-water, for appellant.

Kaleel & Kaleel, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

1

. The contract provides: “If any person making claim under coverage U and the company do not agree that such *person*is legally entitled to recover damages from the owner or operator of an *uninsured motor vehicle*because of *bodily injury*to the insured, or do not agree as to the amount payable hereunder, then each party shall, upon written demand of either, select a competent and disinterested arbitrator.”

MANN, Judge.

The trial judge properly dismissed an action against the appellant’s insurer asserting coverage under the uninsured motorist clause, where the insurer had, after commencement of the action, demanded arbitration.1 The insured had not sought arbitration. The case differs from Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Winfree, Fla.App.2d 1971, 252 So.2d 388, in that there a demand for arbitration had been made by the insured but was ignored by the insurance company. Consequently, those plaintiffs were justified in bringing an action where this plaintiff was not.

On cross-appeal, the insurance company correctly asserts that attorneys’ fees for plaintiff’s attorneys were improperly awarded. The insured did not prevail in the action so the statutory requirement was not met.2

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

2

. Fla.Stat. 627.0127(1) (1960), F.S.A. provides: “Upon the rendition of a judgment or decree by any of the courts of this state against an insurer in favor of an insured or the named beneficiary under a policy or contract executed by the insurer, the trial court, or, in the event of an appeal in which the insured or beneficiary prevails, the appellate court shall adjudge or decree against the insurer and in favor of the insured or beneficiary a reasonable sum as fees or compensation for the insured’s or beneficiary’s attorney prosecuting the suit in which the recovery is had.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1310 

To require Senate confirmation of Inspector General of the Bureau of 

Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 16 (legislative day, JULY 15), 2013 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. 

HELLER, Mr. VITTER, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. 

ENZI, and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To require Senate confirmation of Inspector General of the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Consumer 

5 Financial Protection-Inspector General Reform Act of 

6 2013’’, or the ‘‘CFPB-IG Act of 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1310 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. 

2 The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 

3 is amended— 

4 (1) in section 8G— 

5 (A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘and 

6 the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’’; 

7 (B) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘For the 

8 purposes of implementing this section’’ and all 

9 that follows through the end of the subsection; 

10 and 

11 (C) in subsection (g)(3), by striking ‘‘and 

12 the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’’; 

13 and 

14 (2) in section 12— 

15 (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘the Di16 rector of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

17 Protection;’’ after ‘‘the President of the Import18 Export Bank;’’; and 

19 (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘the 

20 Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection,’’ 

21 after ‘‘the Import-Export Bank,’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of ViroPharma Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/    VINCENT J.
MILANO             
|Vincent J. Milano                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|October 28, 2009                     
|                                     
|/S/    CHARLES A.
ROWLAND, JR.       
|Charles A. Rowland, Jr.              
|Chief Financial Officer              

October 28, 2009

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00690

- CV

IN RE ESTATE OF Alvilda M. AGUILAR , Deceased

From the Probate Court No

. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PC

- 2802

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF JURISDICTION.

It is ORDERED that appellees Margaret Morales and Jesus Morales recover their costs of

this app eal from appellants Anthony C. Aguilar and Michael A. Aguilar.

SIGNED June 4, 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA's) Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) National Advisory Council will meet on September 11, 2018, 2:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. (EDT) in a closed teleconference meeting.

The meeting will include discussions and evaluations of grant applications reviewed by SAMHSA's Initial Review Groups, and involve an examination of confidential financial and business information as well as personal information concerning the applicants. Therefore, the meeting will be closed to the public as determined by the SAMHSA Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use in accordance with Title 5 U.S.C 552b(c)(4) and (6) and Title 5 U.S.C. App. 2, 10(d).

                    Meeting information and a roster of Council members may be obtained by accessing the SAMHSA Committee website at                     *http://www.samhsa.gov/​about-us/​advisory-councils/​csat-national-advisory-council*                     or by contacting the CSAT National Advisory Council Designated Federal Officer; Tracy Goss (see contact information below).                

*Council Name:*                     SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment National Advisory Council.                

*Date/Time/Type:*                     September 11, 2018, 2:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. EDT, CLOSED.                

*Place:*                     SAMHSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857.                

*Contact:*                     Tracy Goss, Designated Federal Officer, CSAT National Advisory Council, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857 (mail), Telephone: (240) 276-0759, Fax: (240) 276-2252, Email:                     *tracy.goss@samhsa.hhs.gov.*

Carlos Castillo,

Committee Management Officer, SAMHSA.

[FR Doc. 2018-15824 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
#### Numa S. LANDRY, Jr. v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company.

*No.*53205.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 1, 1973.

In re: Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company applying for writs of mandamus, cer-tiorari or review.

Writ denied. Judgment not final, and no showing of irreparable injury.
252 La. 115

#### Edith J. GIFFORD and Robert L. Gifford, Jr. v. AURAND MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al.

No. 49193.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1968.

In re: Aurand Manufacturing Company and General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 207 So.2d 160.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                             NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.

                                13531 EAST CALEY

                           CENTENNIAL, COLORADO 80111

                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
                   OFFICER REGARDING ANNUAL REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Kevin T. Knight, the President of Nordstrom Credit, Inc. (the "Company") in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission:

         -        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         -        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                        /s/ Kevin T. Knight
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Kevin T. Knight
                                                        President
                                                        March 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and will be retained by Nordstrom Credit,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Daniel Larry PIZZI and Sherian Pizzi, Appellants, v. Stanley MATUSOW, individually and Byron Holding Corporation, a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-650.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. SI, 1971.

Wilson, Burns, & Browd, Miami, for appellants.

Marvin M. Green and Melvyn Trute, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before SWANN, C. J., CHARLES CARROLL, J., and E. HARRIS DREW, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

By a second amended complaint it was alleged the appellant Daniel Larry Pizzi was a lessee of an apartment in which he resided with his wife, the appellant Sherian Pizzi; that the defendants Byron Holding Corporation, and Stanley Matusow and others had wrongfully evicted the plaintiffs, for which they sought damages. The trial court granted motions of the defendants Byron Holding Corporation and Matusow to dismiss, and dismissed the complaint as to them. The plaintiffs took this appeal from that order.

In a recent decision in this same case, dealing with a separate appeal taken by the plaintiffs from an order of dismissal of another defendant (Pizzi v. Central Bank and Trust Company, Fla.1971, 250 So.2d 895) the Supreme Court held the complaint was sufficient to withstand a motion of that defendant to dismiss. On the authority of that decision we reverse the order which dismissed the complaint as to the defendants Byron Holding Corporation and Stanley Matusow, and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 10.19.1


 




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE HUMACYTE, INC.

2015 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the Humacyte, Inc.
2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan is dated as of February 23, 2018.


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Humacyte,
Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted and the stockholders of the Company have approved the Humacyte, Inc. 2015 Omnibus
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors determines
that it is in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan in order to increase the number of shares of common stock issuable
pursuant to all Awards, including Incentive Stock Options (as such terms are defined in the Plan) from Twelve Million (12,000,000)
to Twenty-Seven Million (27,000,000) shares.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended
as follows:


 


		1.	Section 3(a) of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:



 


“Reserved Shares. Subject to the provisions
of Sections 12 and 13, below, (i) the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards is 27,000,000
Shares, and (ii) the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to Incentive Stock Options is 27,000,000 Shares.
The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.”


 


		2.	Except as herein amended, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as originally adopted
and approved.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby certifies that this
First Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors as of February 18, 2018 and by the stockholders of the Company as of
February 23, 2018.


 


	[CORPORATE SEAL]	 	HUMACYTE, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	/s/ Carrie S. Cox
	 	 	 	 	Carrie S. Cox
	 	 	 	 	President and CEO
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Paul A. Boyer	 	 
	 	Paul Boyer, Assistant Secretary
### NUMBER 13

- 11

- 00 744

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

BNP OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellant,

v.

TOBY SHOR AND SEASHORE INVESTMENTS MANAGEMENT TRUST , Appellee s

.

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

of Nueces County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

BNP Oil and Gas Properties, Ltd., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered in

trial court cause number 09

- 60343

- 3 by the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County,

Texas. This appeal was originally docketed in appellate cause 13

- 11

- 00413

- CV. In

that cause, a ppellant f iled a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. By order, the Court2

granted the motion and ordered the appeal of BNP Oil and Gas Properties, Ltd. to be

severed and placed in this cause for disposition. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a).

The Court, having considere d the documents on f ile and BNP Oil and Gas

Properties, Ltd.’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion

should be granted . The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed agains t appellant. See id . R. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having

di smissed the appeal at appellant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 1st day of December , 2011.
Exhibit 32-1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of MangoSoft, Inc. and Subsidiary
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dale Vincent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Dale Vincent
    ----------------------------------
    Chief Executive Officer (principal
    executive and financial officer)

    May 13, 2005

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Exhibit 23.2


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of SkyTerra Communications, Inc.:

     Under date of March 31, 2005, we reported on the consolidated balance
sheets of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2004, which are included in the annual report on Form 10-K.
In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial
statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement
schedule, Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. This financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule
based on our audits.

     In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.


/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 22, 2012

d1015

Order 

October 22, 2012

144773

SCOTT M. JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144773

COA: 303916

Macomb CC: 05-007517-DZ

MELONIE P. JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.