alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 10477]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “Islam and the Classical Heritage,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Legion of Honor, in San Francisco, California, from on or about August 25, 2018, until on or about January 27, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-10 of July 6, 2018.                

Jennifer Z. Galt,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-15833 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
      Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This
                29th day of March, 2006./s/
                David D. StovallChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Annette BanksChief
                Financial Officer
#### Robert Lee LEVY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-666.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                    GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                         Six months ended June 26, 1999

                                   (Unaudited)


(In millions)

Earnings:
   Earnings before income taxes                              $590
   Fixed charges:
      Minority interest in net earnings of
         consolidated subsidiaries (1)                         44
      Interest expense (2)                                     53
                                                             ----
                                                             $687
                                                             ====

Fixed charges:
   Minority interest in net earnings of
      consolidated subsidiaries (3)                          $ 61
   Interest expense (2)                                        53
                                                             ----
                                                             $114
                                                             ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           6.03
                                                             ====


(1)  Minority  interest in net earnings of  consolidated  subsidiaries  includes
     dividends on subsidiary's preferred stock.

(2)  Interest  expense  includes an amount for one-third of the rental  expense,
     which the Company  believes is a reasonable  approximation  of the interest
     factor for such rentals.

(3)  The  fixed  charges  amount  for  minority  interest  in  net  earnings  of
     consolidated subsidiaries represents the pretax earnings amount which would
     be required to cover such fixed charges as calculated below:

                Subsidiary's Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
                -------------------------------------------------
                             100% - Income Tax Rate

     The  income  tax rate is based on the  relationship  of the  provision  for
     income taxes to earnings before income taxes for the respective period.


                                        9
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130181 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130181 

 COA: 266192 

Kalamazoo CC: 03-001363-FH 

HADJI HUSSINE SANDERS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 8, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND CASHIER
             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Volunteer  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Corporation")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  September  30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the   undersigned,   the  President  and  Vice  President  and  Cashier  of  the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Corporation;

Date:  November  12, 2004                     By: /s/ Reed D. Matney
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                     Reed D. Matney
                                                     President


Date:  November  12, 2004                     By: /s/ Greg Oliver
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                     Greg Oliver
                                                     Vice President and Cashier
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
                                                

                             PAGEMART WIRELESS, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (In thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)

                                                                    
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                            THREE MONTHS
                                 YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED     YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED     YEAR ENDED          ENDED
                                DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31,       MARCH 31,
                                   1994           1995           1996          1997           1998(1)          1999
                                ------------  ------------   ------------  -------------  ------------     -------------
<S>                            <C>             <C>          <C>            <C>            <C>              <C>        
Earnings:
  Net loss.................... $    (45,813)   $  (53,113)  $    (48,598)  $    (43,887)  $   (59,316)     $  (25,203)
  Add:  Amount of
     previously capitalized
     interest amortized.......            -             -              -              -           252             572
  Add: Fixed charges..........       12,933        30,720         35,041         38,499        43,798          15,024
                               ------------  ------------   ------------   ------------   -----------      ----------
  Adjusted earnings                 (32,880)      (22,393)       (13,557)        (5,388)      (15,266)         (9,607)

Fixed charges:
  Interest in
     indebtedness.............       11,209        28,383         32,368         36,672        52,645         14,668
  Amortization of debt
     issuance costs...........          800         1,052          2,143            844         1,172             314
  Interest portion
     of rental and
     lease expense............          924         1,285            530            983         1,428              42
                               ------------  ------------   ------------  -------------   -----------      ----------
  Fixed charges                      12,933        30,720         35,041         38,499        55,245          15,024

Deficiency of
  earnings available to
  cover fixed charges......... $    (45,813)  $   (53,113)  $    (48,598) $     (43,887)  $   (70,511)     $  (24,631)
                               ============   ===========   ============  =============   ===========      ==========


Earnings to fixed charges
  ratio.......................            -             -              -              -             -               -
</TABLE>

(1)  The fixed charge adjustment to earnings excludes $11.4 million of
     capitalized interest for the year ended December 31, 1998.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles EDWARDS.

No. 60957.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 22, 1978.

Loyola Law School Clinic, William J. O’Hara, III, Supervising Atty., New Orleans, Gwendolyn Thompson Robein, Student Practitioner, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Howat A. Peters, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Edwards was indicted on September 17, 1975 by the Orleans Parish Grand Jury on three counts of distribution of a controlled dangerous substance, heroin, in violation of R.S. 40:966. -Following a trial by jury defendant was found guilty as charged and was sentenced to life imprisonment at hard labor on each of the three counts. On appeal defendant relies on only one assignment of error but also requests an examination of the record for discoverable errors.

We find no merit in the assignment of error (a request that the jury be instructed on entrapment), and we have found no error discoverable by an inspection of the pleadings and proceedings which would warrant a reversal of defendant’s conviction.

*Decree*

Accordingly, we affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence.

AFFIRMED.
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Odes Neal HAMILTON and Raymond Augusta Black, Appellees.

No. 70-855.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 27, 1970.

Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Caidin, Rothenberg, Kogan, Kornblum & Rothenberg and Edward Carhart, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the state from a pretrial order in a criminal prosecution in the circuit court, as authorized by § 924.07 (8) Fla.Stat., F.S.A.1969. The challenged order granted defendants’ motion for severance, opposed by the state, which had elected to try jointly the defendants who were charged by indictment with the crime of murder in the first degree. The defendants, in the presence of each other, had made statements which were self-incriminating and which implicated the other. We find no error in that ruling of the trial court. It represented a matter resting in the discretion of the court (Jackman v. State, Fla.App.1962, 140 So.2d 627; Sylvia v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 286), and *510in the circumstances presented the order of severance was proper. See Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476.

Affirmed.
EPA Meeting with Airlines for America

January 26, 2012

Attendees:

EPA OUST: 

Mark Barolo, Liz McDermott, Linda Gerber, Paul Miller, Tim Roberts, Erin Knighton, Cho Yi 

Kwan, Dave Hamnett

Airlines for America:

Grant Smith, Burns and McDonnell Engineering

Steve Barker, Airlines for America

Tom Richichi, Beveridge and Diamond

Bethany French, Beveridge and Diamond

Tim Pohle, Airlines for America

At this meeting EPA and the Airlines for America discussed the proposed changes to the UST 

regulations. The discussion focused on the proposed changes to previously deferred airport 

hydrant systems and the universe of commercial airports that would fall under the proposed 

regulations.
Exhibit
4.2


 


WETOUCH
TECHNOLOGY INC.


 


DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES


 


GENERAL


 


The
following description of our capital stock is intended as a summary only. This description is based upon, and is qualified by
reference to, our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as mended to date (our “certificate of incorporation”),
our Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended to date, (our “bylaws”), and applicable Nevada law. This summary may not
complete. You should read our certificate of incorporation (including the certificate
of amendment thereto) and our bylaws, which are incorporated by reference as exhibits
to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the provisions that are important to you.


 


DESCRIPTION
OF COMMON STOCK


 


We
are authorized to issue 300,000,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $0.001 and as of March 23, 2021, we had 31,811,523
shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The voting, dividend and liquidation rights of the holders of shares of common
stock are subject to, and qualified by, the rights of the holders of the preferred stock, if any, of the Company.


 


Dividend
Rights


 


The
holders of outstanding shares of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends out of funds legally available at the times
and in the amounts that our board of directors may determine.


 


Voting
Rights


 


Each
holder of our common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders.
Cumulative voting for the election of directors is not provided for in our articles of incorporation, which means that the holders
of a majority of our shares of common stock voted can elect all of the directors then standing for election.


 


DESCRIPTION
OF PREFERRED STOCK


 


We
are authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock at a par value of $0.001 and as of March 23, 2021, we had
no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.


 


Preferred
Stock


 


The
preferred stock may be issued at any time or from time to time, in any one or more series, and any such series shall be comprised
of such number of shares and may have such voting powers, whole or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences
and relative, participating, options or other special rights and qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereof, including
liquidation preferences, as shall be stated and expressed in the board resolutions of the Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1115 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1115

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to ensure that minimum 
wage requirements do not apply to inmates with respect to work done for 
           the incarcerating entity, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 16 (legislative day, June 15), 1993

   Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Bryan, and Mr. Dorgan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                       Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to ensure that minimum 
wage requirements do not apply to inmates with respect to work done for 
           the incarcerating entity, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938 TO INMATES.

    (a) Definition.--Section 3(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 
1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(e)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and (4)'' and inserting 
        ``(4), and (5)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(5) The term `employee' does not include any inmate of a 
        penal or correctional institution of the Federal Government, 
        District of Columbia, or a State or political subdivision of a 
        State.''.
    (b) Exemptions.--Section 13(a) of such Act (29 U.S.C. 213(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (15) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(16) any inmate of a penal or correctional institution of 
        the Federal Government, the District of Columbia, or a State of 
        political subdivision of a State.''.
    (c) Application.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
as if enacted on the date of enactment of the Fair Labor Standards Act 
of 1938.

                                 <all>
```
#### Stewart CARRIER et ux., et al. v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 53974.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 1973.

In re: Huey Duncan and Beverly W. Duncan applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 281 So.2d 805.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its opinion.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.
   /s/ Dr. Lionel L. ReillyDr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ Neal B. SoderquistNeal B. Soderquist, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-96967, No.
333-55082, No. 333-48226, No. 333-31120, No. 333-69381, No. 333-37371, No. 333-37369 and No. 33-58991) of Exar Corporation of our report dated June 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP       
|                                 
|San Jose, California             
|June 14, 2005