alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1319 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and 

the Secretary of Energy to conduct a fuel system requirements harmonization study, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2013 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. KIRK, Mr. COATS, Mr. PORTMAN, 

and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of Energy to conduct 

a fuel system requirements harmonization study, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gas Accessibility and 

5 Stabilization Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY. 

7 Section 211(c)(4)(C) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 7545(c)(4)(C)) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1319 IS

1 (1) in clause (ii)(II), by inserting ‘‘a problem 

2 with distribution or delivery equipment that is nec3 essary for the transportation or delivery of fuel or 

4 fuel additives,’’ after ‘‘equipment failure,’’; 

5 (2) in clause (iii)(II), by inserting ‘‘(except that 

6 the Administrator may extend the effectiveness of a 

7 waiver for more than 20 days if the Administrator 

8 determines that the conditions under clause (ii) sup9 porting a waiver determination will exist for more 

10 than 20 days)’’ before the semicolon at the end; 

11 (3) by redesignating the second clause (v) (re12 lating to the authority of the Administrator to ap13 prove certain State implementation plans) as clause 

14 (vi); and 

15 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(vii) PRESUMPTIVE APPROVAL.—Notwithstanding 

17 any other provision of this subparagraph, if the Adminis18 trator does not approve or deny a request for a waiver 

19 under this subparagraph within 3 days after receipt of the 

20 request, the request shall be considered to be approved as 

21 received by the Administrator and the applicable fuel 

22 standards shall be waived for the period of time re23 quested.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1319 IS

1 SEC. 3. FUEL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS HARMONIZATION 

2 STUDY. 

3 Section 1509 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub4 lic Law 109–58; 119 Stat. 1083) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting 

7 ‘‘biofuels,’’ after ‘‘oxygenated fuel,’’; and 

8 (B) in paragraph (2)(G), by striking ‘‘Tier 

9 II’’ and inserting ‘‘Tier III’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ftECE\VEO 

OPPT CBIC 

70\~ JUL 25 ~M \lt 55 

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

Chambers Works 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

July 21, 2014 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Re: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003 - 0012 

p.£CENE0 

~\}()"' 

-nr.\(Ei ceNiER 

EPAU'o'-

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

June 2014 Sample Data 

Dear Chemical Control Division: 

CBIC Control Number 

361151 

Attached please find summaries ofPFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works 

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A inJune 2014. In accordance with the 

current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are provided 

to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures 

include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this monitoring period. 

sm~ 

Amu~arajasffigam " 

Area Manager-Secure Environmental Treatment 

DuPont Chambers Works 

AJ/clc 

Enclosures 
Copy to: 

Document Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) 

Principal Environmental Engineer 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Water Surfacing 

Mail Code 401-02B 

401 E. State Street 

P.O. Box 420 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 
Analyte 

PFOA 

Sample ID 

Date 

Top (ft) 

Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 

units Diss. (D) Duplicate# 

ug/L T 

Summary of Analytical Results 

662 - June 2014 

662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 

6/2/14 6/9/14 6/16/14 6/23/14 6/30/14 

0 0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 0 

1 1 1 1 1 

2.15 2.55 2.46 1.77 3.92 

.. 

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid 

ug/L = micrograms per Liter ·--

I 

ug/L- micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) 

LOQ = limit of quantification = 0.100 ug/L 

I I 

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 

represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 6/23/14. 

Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample 

collected on 6/23/14 represents the average of lab duplicate results. 1 

I 

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. 

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 

! 

Copy of cwk 6
#### In the Matter of Eagle Insurance Company, Appellant, v Maroof Sadiq, Respondent.

[655 NYS2d 601]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the appeal, as limited by the petitioner’s brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated March 26, 1996, as, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to the original determination in an order dated February 6, 1996, denying the petitioner’s application for a permanent stay of arbitration.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, upon reargument, the order dated February 6, 1996, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for (1) a hearing to determine whether the subject vehicle was insured, (2) joinder of Allstate Insurance Company as a necessary party, and (3) a de novo determination of the petition.

The petitioner established a prima facie case as to the existence of insurance coverage for the subject vehicle by producing the police accident report which contained the offending vehicle’s insurance code designation *(see, Matter of Centennial Ins. Co. v Capehart,*220 AD2d 499; *Matter of Wausau Ins. Co. v Ramos,*151 AD2d 487). The proof submitted by the respondent, a letter from the Claim Department of Allstate Insurance Company, the offending vehicle’s alleged carrier, stating in *606conclusory fashion that it did not insure the offending vehicle, was insufficient to overcome the prima facie case presented by the petitioner *(see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Rivera,*148 AD2d 393; *Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Horowitz,*121 AD2d 634, 635; *Matter of State Wide Ins. Co. v Libecci,*104 AD2d 893). It was, therefore, improper for the Supreme Court to determine that the vehicle was uninsured without a hearing, and without joining Allstate Insurance Company as a necessary party *(see, Matter of Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Boiano,*199 AD2d 314). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?country=US&countryid=US&addtohistory=&searchtype=address&cat=&address=9909%20Jefferson%20Blvd&city=Culver%20City&state=CA&zipcode=90232%2d3505

- npr.org
http://www.npr.org/about/press/NPR_Fact_Sheet.pdf
# C_2022024EN.01004201.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/42

---

Order of the General Court of 9 November 2021 — Amort and Others v Commission

(Case T-267/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen — COVID-19 vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S [recombinant])’ - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Lack of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 24/55)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Heidi Amort (Jenesien, Italy) and the 22 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 1763 (final) of 11 March 2021 granting a conditional marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen — COVID-19 vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S [recombinant])’, a medicinal product for human use, as amended and supplemented.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by TF, TG, TH and TI, by TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II and by VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by TF, TG, TH and TI, by TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II and by VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II.

| 3. | Ms Heidi Amort and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex I shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Ms Heidi Amort and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex I shall pay the costs.

| 4. | TF, TG, TH and TI, TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II and VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

TF, TG, TH and TI, TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II and VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 263, 5.7.2021.

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of registration.
 SUMMARY: Registrants listed below have applied for and been granted registration by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as bulk manufacturers of various classes of schedule I and II controlled substances.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The companies listed below applied to be registered as bulk manufacturers of various basic classes of controlled substances. Information on previously published notices are listed in the table below. No comments or objections were submitted for these notices. Company
FR docket
PublishedCedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc
83 FR 5275
February 6, 2018.Cayman Chemical Company
83 FR 17678
April 23, 2018.
 The DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of these registrants to manufacture the applicable basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated each of the company's maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing each company's physical security systems, verifying each company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing each company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the DEA has granted a registration as a bulk manufacturer to the above listed companies. Dated: July 19, 2018. John J. Martin, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-15963 Filed 7-25-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Vivian K. O’ROURKE, Appellant, v. TOWN OF LAKE PARK et al., Appellees.

No. 71-1018.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 2, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Cutter & Buck Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on December 10, 2004 (“the Report”), I, William B.Swint, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
|        | /s/ WILLIAM B.  SWINT                           |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | William B. Swint                                |
|   | *Interim President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|   | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                 |

 

----
..**~~. re~~**  

## .... ,:\i

# C~ Chippewa County**1~AIRPORT** 

## Economic Development Corporation www.airciu.com www.airciu.com (906) 495-5631 • Fax: (906) 495-5714· e-mail: ccedc@sault.com March 22, 2010

The Honorable Ray LaHood UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ofTRANSPORA TION 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590.
Dear Secretary LaHood: The Economic Development Corporation ofChippewa County and Chippewa County International Airport, the only commercial airport located 

### in Michigan's EasternUpperPeninsula, wish to express

. strong support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit Metro and

Haneda Tokyo airports
.. Approval ofDelta's newservice would be a major benefit for ourregion. With daily service between Chippewa County International Airport and Detroit Metro, area businesses wouldbenefit from convenient connections to Tokyo's Haneda airport

- service would position businesses in our region to strengthen relationships with Japanese markets. Business travelers look to the convenience provided byflying into Tokyo's downtownHaneda airport. Given the disproportionate economic challenges that Michigan has faced and continues to struggle with, and Delta's estimates that 300jobs are created to support each new long-haul transpacific flight -by approving Delta's application, the Departmentwould provide some measure ofreliefto the State's beleaguered economy. Detroit Metro is a proven and successfulgateway to Asia, and as an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment·· Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our business travelers. Thank you for your consideration ofthis request. Cordially,

athy President ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

ofCHIPPEWA COUNTY
5019 W. AIRPORT DRIVE • KINCHELOE, MICHIGAN 49788
sT/s 7

SUPERVISOR'S DISTRICT NO 3 | SHEET NO.
ENUMERATION DISTRICT No.2 3 ein Lf-

the oh WRRD (OR SGU a sree, 2

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—BUREAU OF THE CENSUS OQ Di-ss] |

FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED tit we J970- POPULATION

TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF COUNTY _........ ee ee entaseets RN ON aia ee Ne NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE ./

[insert proper uame and, also, name of class, as towuship, town, precinct, district, hundred, beat, etc. See instructions.)

~~ {Insert proper jgnne and, 1

[Insert name of institution, ifany, and indicate the lines on which the entries Gre made. See instructiotis.)

4 1, or borough. See instructions) a
NRE OF INS TORLITON ccc at Re Ss oh ie ge ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE... G@2#e DAY OF MAB BAO. ye Ltt Wt hyet-2l 22 ENUMERATOR.

PLACE OF ABODE. NAME RELATION. “OCCUPATION.

—

:

widowed,ordl-| *

CITIZENSHIP. EDUCATION, NATIVITY AND MOTHER TONGUE.

Place of birth of each person and parents of each person enumerated. If born tn the Unlted States, elve theatate or territory. If of foreign birth, cive the place of birth
and, in addition, the motbertomgue. (See instructions.)

peak

= of each person whose place of abode on

, | House | ROMs! vam: January 1, 1920, was In this family.

Bamber
or farm, | 1 Tr | eerily| Enter suruame first, then the given name and middle Relationship of this
etc. ing | Samily : y erson tothe head of

(Sea | house lImorde Initial, if any. he family,

In order| of vi
Instruc- of vin- tation Inclade every person Ilving on Saanary 1, 1920. Omit
children born alnce January 1, 1920.

= | Age al last birth-
day

Xum-
meat beet
Trade, profession, or ie- | Industry, business, or extab- arm
ularkind of work done, as lishment in which atwork, were jeched-
spinner, salesman, labor- Aa cotton mill, dry goods |“O'her.or} ale.

. . working
er, ef¢, store, farm, etc. on own

account,

e

English.

PERSON, FATHER. MOTHER,

tlon totheUntt-

ed States.
earofnatural-

iia
Attended school

mortgaged.
any time since
Sept. 1, 1019,

Home owned or
rented

Single, married,
vorced,

Year of Immigra-

If naturalized,

Whether able to
write,

Whether able tos

Naturalized or
Whether able to
read

If owned, free or
allen.

Street, avenue.
road, etc

Place of birth. ~ Place of birth. | Mother tonguc. Place of birth. Mother tongue,

= | Color or race,

R ISR [5|s 3
a

oo
a
mn

r]

23 2 28

~_

es

ry

Historic census records are maintained and released by
the National Archives and Records Administration,
not the U.S. Census Bureau.

~

Mert __| |
| 0 kc} poe”
Visit http:/www.archives.gov for more information about publicly | 7 Se AC EE aE Ratti 3
available records like the one shown here. | ——————

—"
So <
re

_
ne

RERERERRE

_
to

—
em W

AUK ge NG

ay
ar

—
o

="
~]

-"
@

—
©

o

—

tN

we)

un
‘a
ie

oS ¢

2
2
i
2 f.
2
24 LZ
vi |W Ge. Motes
9
> |
9
-

4
ane

31 ‘ a :.

«J

a ;
eave LL OA 2

Lit Yop
wy, A Nita

ae AY} Oem
| eed ~

AJ LY a

i)
vs)

to
=]

Ww
Oo

oo
to

os
(o>)

oo
—

MK VAL,
Wie mis

i]
ou

os
a

Lv)
«~]

Oo
ao

i)
oO

he
oO

ron
_

rn
to

a
Ww

ro
r-

we
oe
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA STATE TROOPERS 

ASSOCIATION (PSTA) (TROOPER JOHN 

BOGAROWSKI),

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 49 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Preferred Voice, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mary G. Merritt, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.













/s/ Mary G. Merritt




Mary G. Merritt


Principal Executive Officer


Principal Financial Officer


February 11, 2011
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cutter & Buck Inc. ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on December XX, 2002 ("the Report"), I, Frances M. Conley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/FRANCES M. CONLEYFrances M. Conley
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

---
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Allen E. Larson, certify that: 

1.   Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Minn Dak Farmers Cooperative;  

2.   Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.   Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 

4.   TheCompany’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

a)   designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

b)   evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation. 

c)   disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   TheCompany’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theCompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board ofdirectors: 

a)   allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

b)   anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.