alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
262 La. 1074

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Freddie Lee MERRITT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52639.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 18, 1972.

In re: Freddie Lee Merritt applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, certi-orari and prohibition.

Writ refused. Considering the evidence taken by the trial judge, we are of the opinion that the showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the evidence does not appreciatively show that relator was given the Boykin warnings.

TATE, J.,

concurs in denial. See State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La. 315, 259 So.2d 557 (1972).

DIXON, Justice,

dissents.

I am unable to conclude that Boykin has been followed.
Faison, George 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Hi George, 

Miller, Jeff <Jeff_Miller@treated-wood.org> 

Friday, May 30, 2014 7:00 PM 

Faison, George 

TWC NHSM petition 

EPA NHSM TWC Petition info on BTU and Quantities 5 28 14.doc 

Here is an electronic copy of the information that we handed to you on Wed. 

Thx, Jeff 
TREATED 

WOOD 

COUNCIL 

1101 K Street, NW 

Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20005 

Phone: (202) 641-5427 

Fax: (202) 463-2059 

ESTIMATES OF BTU VALUE AND QUANTITY OF TREATED 

WOOD BIOMASS RECYCLED FOR ENERGY 

(as part of the TWC Petition for Determination of Identifying Non-Hazardous Secondary Treated 

Wood Biomass as a Non-Waste under 40 C.F.R. Section 241.4(a), filed with EPA on April 3, 

20 13) 

May 28, 2014 

BTU Estimates·: 

Waterborne: 

Borate-only Treated Wood 

Copper and All Organic-Based Treated Wood 

Creosote and Oilborne: 

Creosote (non-tie) Treated Wood 

Oilborne Copper Naphthenate Treated Wood 

Pentachlorophenol Treated Wood 

Dual Treated Wood: 

Creosote and Borate 

Oil borne Copper Naphthenate and Borate 

7, 200 BTU per pound 

300,000 BTU per cubic foot 

7, 200 BTU per pound 

300,000 BTU per cubic foot 

7,900 BTU per pound 

400,000 BTU per cubic foot 

7, l 00 BTU per pound 

290,000 BTU per cubic foot 

7, I 00 BTU per pound 

290,000 BTU per cubic foot 

7,500 BTU per pound 

350,000 BTU per cubic foot 

7,200 BTU per pound 

300,000 BTU per cubic foot 

·BTU values derived from TWC NHSM Petition to EPA, dated April3, 2013 
Estimates on the Quantity of Treated Wood Biomass Potentially Recycled for Encrgyt: 

Waterborne (as part of C&D recovery): 

Borate-only Treated Wood 

Copper and All Organic-Based Treated Wood 

Creosote and Oilborne: 

Creosote (non-tie) Treated Wood (actual) 

Oilborne Copper Naphthenate Treated Wood 

Pentachlorophenol Treated Wood (actual) 

Dual Treated Wood: 

Creosote and Borate 

Oilborne Copper Naphthenate and Borate 

7,800 million cubic feet per year (MCF/yr) 

(50% of all Borate-only treated wood used 

each year - 15,600 MCF, i.e. 3% of 520,000 

million cubic feet per year) 

169,000 MCF/yr 

(50% of all copper and all organic-based 

treated wood used each year - 338,000 

MCF, i.e. 65% of 520,000 MCF/yr) 

5 MCF/yr 

(20% of 25 MCF used each year) 

0.5 MCF/yr 

(50% of I MCF used each year) 

6.4 MCF/yr) 

(20% of 32 MCF used each year) 

2,500 MCF/yr 

(50% of 5,000 MCF used each year) 

250 MCF/yr 

(50% of 500 MCF used each year) 

t Quantity estimates derived from T WC Comments to EPA on NHSM Proposed Rulemaking, dated August 2, 20 I 0, 

and LSU 2007 Statistical Overview of the US Wood Preserving Industry
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cutter & Buck Inc. ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 9, 2002 ("the Report"), I, Frances M. Conley, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/FRANCES M. CONLEYFrances M. Conley
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive, Financial
and Accounting Officer)
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         July 25, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 19, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 454 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-195, CP2018-273.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-15844 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
##### 



Novell, Inc.
Letter of Understanding
 Date:
    
    August 1, 2006
 To:
    
    Tom Francese
 From:
    
    Ron Hovsepian, President/CEOAlan Friedman, Senior Vice President People
 Re:
    
    Terms and Conditions of your Long-Term International Assignment
      RELOCATION BENEFITS:
  1




---



##### 




    
    Per page two of the Offer Letter, an annual cash allowance of USD$250,000.00
GROSS (less applicable tax withholding), which is intended to compensate you for a portion
of your expenses associated with your housing, car, cost of living in the assignment
location, and the continuation of your residence in Texas.
    
    Per page two of the Offer Letter, Novell will reimburse you for the cost of you
and your dependents to travel to or from the United States, up to a maximum reimbursement
of USD$24,000 NET (Novell pays applicable taxes) per year, subject to your submission of
receipts to Hewitt Mobility, Novells relocation vendor.
    
    For the duration of the assignment, Novell will directly pay for the cost of
storing those of your household goods that currently are being stored by Hewitt Mobility in
the United States for the duration of the assignment. Novell will also pay the vendor
directly to move these goods out of storage and to a location designated by you. However,
once the goods are moved out of storage , any additional fees associated with accessing
these stored goods shall be at your own expense and must be paid directly by you to the
vendor.
    
    Per page three of the Offer Letter, at the end of your assignment Novell will
reimburse you for the costs associated with your move back to the United States, up to a
maximum of USD$50,000 NET (Novell pays applicable taxes), provided you submit appropriate
documentation to receive reimbursement in accordance with Novells reimbursement policies.
    
    If Novell requests and you agree to return to the United States for the purpose
of accepting a different position or assignment, you will be offered the core relocation
benefits package per the applicable Novell relocation policy at that time.
    
    Novell will supply annual tax preparation in the US and in foreign locations
where required based on your work-days in such countries, including pre-assignment tax
consultation. All tax preparation and consultation shall be provided by a Certified Public
Accounting firm of Novells choosing (the CPA firm).
   STATUS AS AN AT-WILL EMPLOYEE:
 2




---



##### 



NOVELL U.S. PROCESS & POLICIES APPLY:
  PLEASE REVIEW:
  CHANGES AMENDMENTS AND GAPS:
    3




---



##### 



Return the signed copies of these documents to Janice Jones in the Novell Human
Resources Department and retain any copies for your files.
 4




---



##### 



Signatures
  /s/ Tom Francese
    
    Aug. 23, 2006Tom Francese
    
    Date/s/ Ron Hovsepian
    
    August 24, 2006Ron Hovsepian
    
    Date/s/ Alan Friedman
    
    Aug. 2, 2006Alan Friedman
    
    Date
 5




---



##### 



ACCEPTANCE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
   /s/ Thomas M. Francese

SignatureThomas M. Francese

Printed NameAug. 23, 2006

Date
 6
#### Clifford Samuel POARCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-570.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                             642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     86,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,384
<PP&E>                                         169,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,477
<BONDS>                                         10,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,483
<COMMON>                                           121
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,148
<SALES>                                        132,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,289
<CGS>                                           42,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,174
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,174
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Francis Kyle RUMFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 16, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Indian River County; D. C. Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1



                     NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                 Computation of Ratio of Earnings Available for
                         Fixed Charges to Fixed Charges
                             (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended January 31,              2002         2001         2000         1999         1998
----------------------            -------      -------      -------      -------      -------
<S>                               <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings before
income taxes                      $23,429      $15,265      $34,676      $47,572      $42,959

Fixed charges
  (interest cost)                  25,012       29,339       27,208       31,586       36,475
                                  -------      -------      -------      -------      -------

Earnings available for
  fixed charges                   $48,441      $44,604      $61,884      $79,158      $79,434
                                  =======      =======      =======      =======      =======

Ratio of earnings available
  for fixed charges to fixed
  charges                            1.94         1.52         2.27         2.51         2.18
                                  =======      =======      =======      =======      =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 11. Statement re computation of per share earnings

The  reconciliation  of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per common share  computations  for the years ended  December 31 are as
follows: (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Years Ended
                                             December 31, 2004              December 31, 2003              December 31, 2002
                                         --------------------------     --------------------------     --------------------------
                                                  Weighted     Per               Weighted    Per                Weighted     Per
                                          Net     Average     Share      Net     Average    Share       Net     Average     Share
                                         Income    Shares    Amount     Income    Shares    Amount     Income    Shares    Amount
                                         ------   --------   ------     ------   --------   ------     ------   --------   ------
<S>                                     <C>        <C>        <C>      <C>        <C>        <C>      <C>        <C>       <C>
Basic Earnings per Common Share
Net income available to common
   shareholders                         $18,214    19,124     $0.95    $16,366    17,724     $0.92    $12,877    14,714     $0.88
                                                              =====                          =====                          =====
Effect of Dilutive Shares
Weighted average shares if converted                  352                            263                            186
                                                   ------                         ------                         ------
Diluted Earnings per Common Share
Net income available to common
   shareholders                         $18,214    19,476     $0.94    $16,366    17,987     $0.91    $12,877    14,900    $0.86
                                        =======    ======     =====    =======    ======     =====    =======    ======    =====
</TABLE>


All per share data and average  shares were  restated to reflect a 3-for-2 stock
split  declared  on May 23,  2002 and January 18, 2005 and paid on July 12, 2002
and February 18, 2005, respectively.

At December 31, 2004 257,100 stock options were excluded from the calculation of
earnings per common share as they were  antidilutive.  There were no shares that
were antidilutive at December 31, 2003 and 2002.
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Malvin ENGLANDER, Appellee.

No. 69-661.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1971.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Joseph Durant, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Jepeway, Gassen & Jepeway, Frates, Floyd, Pearson & Stewart, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on June 16, 1970 (237 So.2d 193) reversing the order of dismissal of the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed April 7, 1971 (246 So.2d 746) and mandate dated May 12, 1971, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause with instructions to reinstate the order of the trial court dismissing the information as to Malvin Englander;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued on August 4, 1970 is withdrawn as it applied to Malvin Englander, the judgment of this court filed June 16, 1970 insofar as it applied *677to Malvin Englander is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the order of the trial court dismissing the information as to Malvin Englander is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the Criminal Court of Record (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
#### Madeline WOLFE, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY and Ashton Tyler, Appellees.

No. 43761.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 30, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Morgan W. WALKER et al. v. LOUISIANA EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY and the Honorable John J. McKeithen, Governor, State of Louisiana.

No. 53522.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1973.

In re: Louisiana Expressway Authority applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 274 So.2d 716.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law presented by this application.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

CALOGERO, J., recuses himself.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. John Henry MAJORS, III, Respondent.

No. 41238.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 21, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 247 So.2d 446.

ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, C. J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          804439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                804439
<PP&E>                                         6697580
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2343748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5158271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           981177
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4177094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5158271
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                974970
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                828637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               85539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     60794
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
260 La. 701

#### Elmer VITTETOE, Jr. v. TRADERS & GENERAL INSURANCE CO. et al., and Allstate Insurance Co. et al.

No. 52077.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 11, 1972.

In re: Jackie J. Mattson, Baptist Christian Academy and Traders & General Insurance Company applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 255 So.2d 831.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.
#### The HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and Joseph La Motta, Appellants, v. Michael S. NEWMAN, Appellee.

No. 71-1278.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 3, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Milan DILBER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-1196.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 14, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 72-980.

#### Vastola *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir.

Certiorari denied.
| > pa Ingles aumbared 2.1 apd 17 are not to be asked in rexjact to tants icon wusbered11;12,16, 16;17,19, and 0a
Page Nove} ri ssberei REVS :

-ScuHepute 1.—Inhabitants in SOes; tds Draw 22/2, in the Count y of B.
of Tr7y12210_, enumerated by me on the 7 day of ila 1870s
tee sae ;

VaLUE OF Real: Estate |
OWXED.

—— —— ——

/

Black
(M.), Chi-

__nere (C.). Indian (Fh)

it na
alt

ive months
te, he

|
|

nombered in

Profession, Occupation,
or Trade of each persen,
male or female.

The name of every person whose
place of abode on the first day uf |
June, 1870, was-in this family.

——

-

me

Cannot write.

Females (Fy
—White (W.),

i

the oder of visitation,

i+ =] Value of Pereona) Estate,

born within the year, state
‘Jun, Feo ae)
moath (Jan,, Feb, &e.)

' nt = Pirth-aay.

Ago
under i
month (Jan.,

If married withis the year, state

(B.), Mulatto

in fract

Famillica, numtercd in the onier |
of visitation
u

Attended sebool within the

Dweolling-horres,
Sex,—Males (M.),

Color
f

i

f

k

}
!
‘
i
}

<2
a
a
oe
by
&
=
S
«
=
se
>

i
pr
i

ai f

"
to
i
>)

'
t

ms
1 oR
| TM | Canmot read.
|

I

a

}

aI

]

ohh ine Wrorti Arm :

~

lw e ett yes thet = aes

Sees Say) ee Se ee

|
.
: |
| 0,6-60\L bis?

Aon

eee Berg | Wi Ay! DN
a htenara. LS Wes am one
[he iar tata. Pray |) t ae a b

‘ Peat _ Pray. 241 fa 2B : Ava Aa. |
19 Witl'awe alin 19. D8 Prorter exons
20/26 290 Uvhrnem Edaon’? 400 [2| Alaattrr—_|
hel ieee Bahay 0? Badr err
“et Agave Ly I (3| 7 Pho
cates: Pore fta B__
eg Seek paola Wb) —
si _——— Aylara\!1'} 23 Be eye aoe |
256 | ac Ail Tn Y OAS ies Se Dow) £57
7 i | SEs Costar Asien | 4 ee |
Historic census records are maintained and released by fy Sy]
the National Archives and Records Administration,

pean Pat not the U.S. Census Bureau.
Paw

is Ba, | Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly
2bg\2Zhy Lyles Chaat available records like the one shown here.

SOW Ifd| ecBady Alora
aa AA

aad abt Dnexachute Uatemad 22 Dil Yl Derren tn Pass | |
6) Eee, a. = _ No.of white foal, We tein en Zz 7 Mer 2 /.