alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6932
REYNALDO CHIROLDES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus D. SCOTT DODRILL, Warden; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-989) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 31, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reynaldo Chiroldes, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Reynaldo Chiroldes, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Chiroldes v. Dodrill , No. CA-01-989 (E.D.N.C. May 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. Hogan Lovells refers to the international legal practice comprising Hogan Lovells 

US LLP, Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells Worldwide Group (a Swiss Verein), and their affiliated businesses with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam 

Baltimore Beijing Berlin Boulder Brussels Caracas Chicago Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong 

Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco 

Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb 

 

Hogan Lovells US LLP 

Columbia Square 

555 Thirteenth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

T +1 202 637 5600 

F +1 202 637 5910 

www.hoganlovells.com 

June 23, 2010 

BY ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION 

Docket DOT-OST-1998-3305 

Docket Operations Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: 14 C.F.R. Part 243 – Passenger Manifest Information – 

Submission of Summary for Acropolis Aviation Limited 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 243.13, Acropolis Aviation Limited (“Acropolis Aviation”) hereby submits a 

statement summarizing how Acropolis Aviation will collect the passenger manifest information 

required by 14 C.F.R. Part 243, and how it will transmit the information to the Department of State in 

the event of an aviation disaster with respect to a covered flight segment. An unredacted version of 

the attached summary including contact information for representatives of Acropolis Aviation who will 

be available any time a covered flight segment is operated will be provided to the appropriate 

Department officials on a confidential basis under separate cover. 

Please feel free to contact me if you have questions concerning Acropolis Aviation’s operations or 

the procedures described in the enclosed summary. 

Sincerely, 

Sheryl R. Israel 

Counsel 

sheryl.israel@hoganlovells.com 

D +1 202 637 8898 

Counsel for Acropolis Aviation Limited 

Enclosure
#### Loren BUTLER, by and through his next friend and father R. Q. Butler, and R. Q. Butler, individually, Appellants, v. PORTER-RUSSELL CORPORATION, a Florida corporation; Kirkland Masonry, Inc., a Florida corporation; Hilton McTyre and Maule Industries, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

Nos. 69-969, 69-989, 69-990-69-993.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AT OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,737
<SECURITIES>                                     6,499
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                       770
<INVENTORY>                                      4,812
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,135
<PP&E>                                           1,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                     643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,890
<BONDS>                                            528
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,940
<SALES>                                         25,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,971
<CGS>                                           17,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    274
<INCOME-TAX>                                        78
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                196
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       196
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BIRNER
DENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,375,028
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,685,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                   361,498
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,215,862
<PP&E>                                       7,277,548
<DEPRECIATION>                                 670,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,905,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,923,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,997,527
<OTHER-SE>                                     451,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,905,118
<SALES>                                     18,980,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,980,220
<CGS>                                        4,790,958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,790,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,621,237
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             189,369
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                378,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                   141,239
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            237,417
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   237,417
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Donald Gee, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,

not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant

and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known

to us by others within those entities, particularly during the

period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about

the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of

the end of the period covered by this report based on such

evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the

registrant's most recent fiscal that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design

or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Donald Gee

---------------------------

Donald Gee

Chief Executive Officer



November 17, 2005
Order filed January 5, 2017 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00785-CV

____________

WOODS MFI, LLC, Appellant

V.

PLAINSCAPITAL BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-01321

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 21, 2016. Appellant timely 

filed a post judgment motion. The notice of appeal was due September 19, 2016. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed its notice of appeal on September 

28, 2016, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for 

extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed 

within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). 

Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an 
2

extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a 

reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery 

Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, 

no pet.). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal by January 15, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If 

appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 99.13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Barrick Gold Corporation (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report).

I, Catherine P. Raw,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 24, 2017



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Catherine P. Raw
|Name:                |  | Catherine P. Raw                                    
|Title:               |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sheldon Niles, Appellant.

[655 NYS2d 578]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered July 27, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A police officer on patrol in an unmarked car was stopped for a red light when the defendant crossed the street in front of him. The officer noticed a bulge in the upper pocket of the defendant’s jacket. Although the officer testified that he could not see the outline of a gun, the defendant had something in his pocket that "looked to me like a gun”. The officer approached the defendant, identified himself as a police officer and asked the defendant what was in his pocket. After the defendant responded that it was a gun, the officer placed his hand on the outside of the zippered pocket and felt that it was indeed a gun. He arrested the defendant and removed a loaded gun from the defendant’s pocket. At the police station, the defendant gave oral and written statements in which he admitted that he was carrying a gun.

The defendant contends that the gun and his statements should be suppressed because he was unlawfully arrested. The hearing court credited the officer’s testimony and denied the motion. We conclude that the record supports the hearing court’s determination. The officer’s observation that there ap*538peared. to be a gun in the defendant’s pocket constituted " ’a founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot’ ” and justified the officer's minimally intrusive question *(see, People v Hollman,*79 NY2d 181, 184). Once the defendant admitted that he was carrying a gun, the officer had probable cause to arrest him *(see, People v Carrasquillo,*54 NY2d 248).

The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur. .
#### Ralph H. HOLLERS, Appellant, v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-674.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 2, 1971.

Kelner & Lewis and Alan H. Dombrow-sky, Miami, for appellant.

Adams, George & Wood and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of Griffis v. Hill, Fla.1969, 230 So.2d 143.
Exhibit 31.2

Section 302 Certification

I, Sean M. McCarthy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Diedrich Coffee, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|Dated: January 25, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Sean M. McCarthy             
|                        |  |  |  | Sean M. McCarthy                 
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register: October 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 206)]
[Notices]               
[Page 65615]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26oc10-41]                         

[[Page 65615]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Portsmouth

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Portsmouth. The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires 
that public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal 
Register.

DATES: Thursday, November 4, 2010, 6 p.m.-8 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Ohio State University, Endeavor Center, 1862 Shyville Road, 
Piketon, Ohio 45661.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel Bradburne, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Energy Portsmouth/Paducah Project 
Office, Post Office Box 700, Piketon, Ohio 45661, (740) 897-3822, 
Joel.Bradburne@lex.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

 Call to Order, Introductions, Review of Agenda
 Approval of September Minutes
 Deputy Designated Federal Officer's Comments
 Federal Coordinator's Comments
 Liaisons' Comments
 Ohio University Update
 Administrative Issues:
    [cir] Subcommittee Updates
    [cir] Recommendation on Public Tour
    [cir] Motions
 Second reading of amendment to the Operating Procedures
 Public Comments
 Final Comments
 Adjourn
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The EM 
SSAB, Portsmouth, welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory 
committee meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons 
with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special 
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Joel Bradburne in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. The Deputy 
Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on October 14, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-26444 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### HOUSING AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF LAKE CHARLES, LOUISIANA v. Albert MINOR.

No. 61590.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Housing Authority of the City of Lake Charles, Louisiana applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Calcasieu. 355 So.2d 271.

Writ denied.