alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, Ronald L. Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Material Sciences Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

c.) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d.) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: November 24, 2004
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1346 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the alternative 

tax liability limitation for small property and casualty insurance companies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2013 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the alternative tax liability limitation for small property 

and casualty insurance companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION FOR ALTERNATIVE 

4 TAX LIABILITY FOR SMALL PROPERTY AND 

5 CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 831(b)(2)(A) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik8 ing ‘‘$1,200,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$2,012,000’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1346 IS

1 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec2 tion 831(b) of such Code is amended by adding at the 

3 end the following new subparagraph: 

4 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

5 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

6 year after 2013, the dollar amount set forth in 

7 subparagraph (A)(i) shall be increased by an 

8 amount equal to— 

9 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

10 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de11 termined under section 1(f)(3) for such 

12 calendar year by substituting ‘calendar 

13 year 2012’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in sub14 paragraph (B) thereof. 

15 If the amount as adjusted under the preceding 

16 sentence is not a multiple of $1,000, such 

17 amount shall be rounded to the next lowest 

18 multiple of $1,000.’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### MORETRENCH CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. BRONSON *&*VEAL ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-749.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 19, 1972.

*207Thomas W. Ruggles and John R. Bush of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellant.

John B. Ritch of the Law Office of Murray W. Overstreet, Jr., Kissimmee, for appellee.

WALDEN, Judge.

Plaintiff failed to give the owner notice that he had recorded a mechanic’s lien. That was in direct violation of Ch. 713.06 (2) (a), F.S.1969, F.S.A., which requires notice be given the owner within forty-five days of cessation of furnishing materials and services.

When plaintiff later tried to foreclose his lien, the trial court dismissed his amended complaint with prejudice solely due to his noncompliance with the above requirement. We disagree and reverse.

This case is controlled by Crane Co. v. Fine, Fla.1969, 221 So.2d 145, and its interpretation of Ch. 713.06(3) (c) 4, F.S.1969, F.S.A. Crane held that the statute requiring timely notice to the owner (713.06(2)) (a) only established priorities. Ch. 713.06 (3) (c) 4, supra, operated as a savings provision. If funds remained available after all lienholders filing timely notice had been discharged, then the tardy lienholder could also receive payment.

Crane made a logical and fair interpretation of the various statutes. We are in complete agreement.

Since we feel plaintiff should be allowed to participate in any remaining funds despite its non-compliance with the notice statute, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

MAGER, J., and WHITE, JOSEPH S., Associate Judge, concur.
IC 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1348 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 

Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1348 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Award 

3 Program Reauthorization Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TERMINATION. 

5 Section 108 of the Congressional Award Act (2 

6 U.S.C. 808) is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2013’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2018’’. 

8 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

9 This Act shall take effect as of October 1, 2013. 

Passed the Senate September 26, 2013. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### RONLEE, INC. and the Seaboard Surety Company, Petitioners, v. The STATE of Florida ex rel. L. C. MORRIS, INC., Respondent.

No. 43655.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 24, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 274 So.2d 570.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
# C_2022222EN.01004101.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/41

---

Order of the General Court of 1 April 2022 — Classen Holz Kontor v EUIPO — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer (new type tiling DRYTILE)

(Case T-308/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/67)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.

---
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 745 

Expressing the sense of the House that a Contract with America should 

restore American competitiveness. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 

Committees on the Judiciary, Natural Resources, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House that a Contract with 

America should restore American competitiveness. 

Whereas Congress should conclude a Contract with America 

to restore American competitiveness; 

Whereas a Contract with America should include a roadmap 

to move American competitiveness forward; and 

Whereas Drs. Michael Porter and Jan Rivkin have developed 

an eight point plan to restore American competitiveness: 

Now, therefore, be it 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 745 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that a 

2 Contract with America should include a roadmap to re3 store American competitiveness by— 

4 (1) simplifying the corporate tax structure with 

5 lower statutory rates and no loopholes; 

6 (2) taxing overseas profits earned by American 

7 multinational companies only where they are earned; 

8 (3) easing the immigration of highly skilled in9 dividuals; 

10 (4) responsibly developing America’s shale-gas 

11 and oil reserves; 

12 (5) aggressively addressing distortions and 

13 abuses in the international trading system; 

14 (6) improving American logistics, communica15 tions, and energy infrastructure; 

16 (7) simplifying and streamlining Federal regu17 lation; and 

18 (8) creating a sustainable Federal budget, in19 cluding entitlement reform. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ELISE MARVIN
, Appellant,

v.

BRETT H. MARVIN
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 2665

[ March 18, 2015 ]

Appeal and cross

- appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; David E. French , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 502013DR001537XXXXSB

.

Jonathan S. Root and Christopher A. Tiso of Jonathan S. Root, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant/cross

- appellee.

Michael D. Cirullo, Jr., of Goren, Cherof, Doody & Ezrol, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Joshua K. Friedman and Jason A. Brodie of Brodie & Friedman, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee/cross

- appellant.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed without prejudice. Pedraja v. Garcia , 667 So. 2d 461, 462 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1996) (Temporary relief awards “are amo ng the areas where trial judges have the very broadest discretion, which appellate courts are very reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of circumstances.”). The parties may present these issues, including the request for retroactiv e support, for consideration by the trial court in any final order or judgment.

G ROSS
, C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



EXHIBIT 6 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a), PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jamie C. Sokalsky, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Barrick Gold Corporation, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Barrick Gold
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and
have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 19, 2004
    /s/ Jamie C. SokalskyName:
    Jamie C. SokalskyTitle:
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                             NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.
                 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS AVAILABLE FOR
                         FIXED CHARGES TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31,                        2003          2002          2001         2000        1999
 ---------------------                         ----          ----          ----         ----        ----
<S>                                           <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>         <C>
Earnings before
   income taxes                               $75,306       $23,429       $15,265      $34,676     $47,572

Fixed charges
  (interest cost)                              23,786        25,012        29,339       27,208      31,586
                                              -------       -------       -------      -------     -------

Earnings available for
  fixed charges                               $99,092       $48,441       $44,604      $61,884     $79,158
                                              =======       =======       =======      =======     =======

RATIO OF EARNINGS AVAILABLE
  FOR FIXED CHARGES TO FIXED
  CHARGES                                        4.17          1.94          1.52         2.27        2.51
                                              =======       =======       =======      =======     =======
</TABLE>
252 La. 116

#### Frank PALMISANO v. Romalic H. SLUCH et al.

No. 49199.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1968.

In re: Frank Palmisano applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 207 So.2d 203.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.
### Order entered December 29, 2015

In The



## QCourt of §ppeals

jf 

## iftb IDistrict of \!Gexas at IDallas

No. 05-15-01069-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.C.M., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-19569-Z



### ORDER

We 

### DENY appellant's December 28, 2015 second motion for additional time to file brief.

We 

### ORDER appellant's brief to be filed by 

### 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 31,

2015. If appellant fails to do so, this Court will exercise available remedies, which

may include the removal of present counsel, ordering the appointment of new counsel, and

other relief this Court deems appropriate.

We 

### DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic transmission

to the Honorable David Lopez, Presiding Judge ofthe 256th Judicial District Court, and the parties.



### Is/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE



# RECEIVED IN

COURT nF 1\PPEM.S, 

### 5th DIST.



## JAN I 

## 5 LUH:i

LISA lVlATZ

CLERK, 5th DISTR!CT<rnurtnfApp.calslftftl1iHBtridnfwexa11atDalla11GeorgeL.AllenSr.CourtsBuilding600CommerceStreet.Suitt200Dallas,Texas75202RETURNTOSENDERCASE:05-15-01069-CVJUSTINF'""Ar>,..TDIYCt·lX.::7sDF:E"'-·jR·0SANDERTDCJ#01100HWVENUS,.r"¥_;}-TuLE--y-o.\-...G,"_.;!I':bF.:·c75z02@663!.0"',..)\<._..7S0266,j;\\1\'llr1.74-·0558fb-:S0-..t2l•II!p!lq}iiqdd
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**

 

I,William P. Lyons, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof AXS-One Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: May 13, 2005 | /s/ William P. Lyons      |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                    | William P. Lyons          |
|                    | Chairman of the Board and |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

1

----
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 10603 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**
versus **Ryan Michael Anderson,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:21

- CR

- 30

- 1

**______________________________** Before **Stewart, Duncan,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Ryan Michael Anderson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Anderson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 3, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10603 Document: 00516633916 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/03/2023No. 22

- 10603

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further re sponsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2
. Case: 22-10603 Document: 00516633916 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/03/2023