alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000947969
<NAME>                        MangoSoft, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                21,873
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      22,030
<PP&E>                                                 3,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                         2,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        22,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  2,436
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                  27
<OTHER-SE>                                            20,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          22,961
<SALES>                                                    4
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           4
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          9,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (2,807)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (6,045)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (6,045)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (6,045)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.64)


</TABLE>
Meeting Agenda August 14, 2014 from 12 – 1:30 P M (PDT) **Teleconference: 1.866.299.3188, 202.343.9113#** Purpose: O pportunity for Arizona officials and utilities to ask questions regarding EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan. I. Welcome and Introductions 5 min II. Questions and Discussion (see attached concerns and question ) 80 min III . Summarize Next Steps 5 min  How to submit comments on proposal: http://www2.epa.gov/carbon - pollution standards/how- comment- clean - power- plan - proposed - rule  Spreadsheets and Technical Support Documents : http://www2.epa.gov/carbon - pollution standards/clean - power- plan - proposed - rule -technical - documents **Anticipated Attendees** ADEQ: Henry Darwin, E ric Massey, Steve Burr Tucson Electric Power: Erik Bakken, Jeff Yockey, Mike Sheehan Salt River Project: Kara Montalvo, Barbara Sprungl, Kelly Barr Arizona Corporation Commission: Steve Olea, Ed Stoneburg, Margaret ‘Toby’ Little Arizona Electric Power Coo p: Logan Gernet, Eric Hiser, Michelle Freeark Arizona Public Service: Chas Spell, Ann Becker, Mike Kafka Pacificorp: Bill Lawson and Cathy Woollums Tristate: TBD Tom Powers OAR, Senior Policy Advisor Will Niebling OAR, Senior Advisor for Congressional and International Affairs Reid Harvey OAP, Director, Clean Air Markets Division Joe Bryson OAP, Climate Protection Partnership Division Matt Clouse OAP, Climate Protection Partnership Division Jeremy Mark OAP, Clean Air Markets Division Jim Ketcham - Colwill Office of Policy Analysis and Review David Solomon Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Debra Dalcher Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Nathan Topham, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Colin Boswell Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Nicholas Swanson Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Deborah Jordan Director, R9 Air Division Colleen McKaughan Associate Director, R9 Air Division Amy Zimpfer Associate Director, R9 Air Division Ben M achol Chief, Clean Energy & Climate Change Office Niloufar Glosson R9 Anita Lee R9 Ray Saracino R9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000756899
<NAME> FIRST-KNOX BANC CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          17,012
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    131,988
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        330,641
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 496,899
<DEPOSITS>                                     404,067
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,986
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,772
<LONG-TERM>                                     33,415
<COMMON>                                        11,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 496,899
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,854
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,234
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                37,088
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,158
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,499
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,589
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      584
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (20)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,274
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,709
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,709
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.71
<LOANS-NON>                                        197
<LOANS-PAST>                                       862
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,122
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,840
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,876
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      539
<RECOVERIES>                                       245
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,166
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,135
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,031
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00253-CV

PKWF GP, LLC, Appellant

v.

Aqua Land Lakeway Medical Development, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-13-004262, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Aqua Land LakewayMedical Development, LLC filed amotion to dismissthis appeal

for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that the notice of appeal filed by PKWF GP, LLC is untimely. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. For the reasons that follow, we will grant the motion.

After the time for filing a notice of appeal and seeking an extension of time to file the

notice of appeal have expired, a party cannot invoke an appellate court’s jurisdiction. See Verburgt

v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); see also Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b) (filing of notice of

appeal invokes appellate court’s jurisdiction over parties). Here, PKWF filed a notice of appeal on

April 23, 2014, challenging a December 4, 2013 default judgment taken against it by Aqua Land in

the underlying suit naming multiple defendants. The default judgment against PKWF became final

when the trial court signed an order of severance on December 20, 2013. That day, PKWF filed a

motion for new trial in the original cause rather than the severed cause. PKWF set a hearing on

its motion, the trial court held a hearing, and the motion was denied by operation of law on
March 6, 2014. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(c) (motion for new trial overruled by operation of law if

not determined by written order within seventy-five days after judgment is signed).

The timely filing of a motion for new trial extends the appellate timetable by 90 days.

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a) (certain postjudgment motions extend time for filing notice of appeal).

However, even if PKWF relied on its filing of the motion for new trial in the original cause to extend

the deadline for filing its notice of appeal, the notice of appeal would have been due on March 20,

2014, ninety days after the signing of the December 20, 2013 severance order. See id. PKWF might

have obtained an extension of time for filing its notice of appeal until April 4, 2014, but that time

has also expired. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 (notice-of-appeal deadline may be extended if, within

fifteen days after deadline, appellant files notice of appeal in trial court and files proper motion for

extension of time in appellate court). PKWF’s notice of appeal was not filed until April 23, 2014.

On May 6, 2014, we requested that PKWF file a response to Aqua Land’s motion by May 16, 2014.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). PKWF did not file any response.

Because PKWF’s April 23, 2014 notice of appeal from the December 20, 2013 order

finalizing the default judgment is untimely, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. We grant Aqua Land’s motion and dismiss this

appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

 

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Appellee’s Motion

Filed: May 30, 2014

2
#### Roland Edgar LEGERE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1036.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 2, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Mark CROSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-701.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 12, 1971.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Alan R. Parlapiano, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

*778Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rodney Durrance, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. United States v. Wade (1967) 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct.1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149; Gilbert v. State of California (1967) 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178; Stovall v. Denno, 1967, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199; Shepard v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 11; and Robinson v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 237 So.2d 268.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10474]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “Judson Dance Theater: The Work is Never Done,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about September 16, 2018, until on or about February 3, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-10 of July 6, 2018.                

Jennifer Z. Galt,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-15655 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
96-1049 Fuller v. Neal

Attachment not available electronically.* This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. -2- UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 12/19/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ STEVEN MICHAEL TULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DONICE NEAL, and Capt. John Doe; GARY WATKINS, Major; KIM THOMPSON, Captain and Lt. John Doe; JOHN HADLEY, Major; LT. MCFEE; FRANK CARLTON, Lt.; BILL ESPANOSA, Sgt.; ALBERT MARTINEZ; FRAZZINO; ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-1049 (D.C. No. 95-S-2396) (D. Colorado)

_____________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

_____________________ Before BRORBY, EBEL and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

_____________________ After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore1 The district court's judgment was entered January4, 1996; the Notice of

Appeal was filed February 2, 1996. -3- ordered submitted without oral argument. Mr. Tuller is a state inmate and pro se litigant. Mr. Tuller filed a civil rights complaint against various prison officials. The district court dismissed the complaint as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C . §1915(d). We agree with the district court and dismiss the appeal. 1 We attach a copy of the district court's eight-page order of dismissal. Mr. Tuller appeals this decision and fails to persuade us of any error made by the district court. The district court's order is lega lly correct and supported by the record. The appeal is DISMISSED as it is legally frivolous for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court's orde r. Entered for the Court: WADE BRORBY United States Circuit Judge
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45478

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

DAMIAN MAXWELL BARBER

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 436

Filed: April 25, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail , District Judge.

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Lara E. Anderson , Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Damian Maxwell Barber pled guilty to aggravated battery . I.C. § § 18

- 903(c) and 18

-

907(b)

. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court

sentenced Barber t o a unified term of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of

three years . The district court retained jurisdiction, and Barber was sent to p articipate in the rider

program. After Barber completed his rider, the district court relinquished jurisdiction. Barber

appeals, claiming that the district court erred by refusing to grant probation.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district2 court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood , 102

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee , 117 Idaho 203, 205

- 06, 786 P.2d 594, 596

-

97 (Ct. App. 1990). The reco rd in this case shows that the district court properly considered the

information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Barber

has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdic tion. The

order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction and Barber ’s sentence are affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10471]


In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of al-Shabaab (and 
Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 
219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant 
to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation with 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that 
the circumstances that were the basis for the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have 
not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the 
designation and that the national security of the United States does 
not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 9, 2018.
Michael Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-15917 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1125 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1125

  To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress reports on 
                       water sharing with Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2013

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress reports on 
                       water sharing with Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Working to Address Treaty 
Enforcement Rapidly for Texas Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORTS ON WATER SHARING WITH MEXICO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of State shall submit to Congress a 
report--
            (1) not later than 45 days after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, and quarterly thereafter, describing efforts by 
        Mexico to meet the treaty obligations of Mexico to deliver 
        water to the Rio Grande, in accordance with the treaty between 
        the United States and Mexico entitled ``Utilization of Waters 
        of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande'' 
        (done at Washington, February 3, 1944); and
            (2) not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, and annually thereafter, describing the benefits to 
        the United States of the document entitled ``Interim 
        International Cooperative Measures in the Colorado River Basin 
        through 2017 and Extension of Minute 318 Cooperative Measures 
        to Address the Continued Effects of the April 2010 Earthquake 
        in the Mexicali Valley, Baja California'' (done at Coronado, 
        California, November 20, 2012 (commonly referred to as ``Minute 
        Number 319'')).
    (b) Action by Secretary of State.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the Secretary of State shall not extend Minute Number 
319 if the Secretary fails to comply with the requirements of this Act.
                                 <all>
```