alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50671 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CARLOS ENRIQUE SAMAYOA-PINEDA,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:14 -CR- 522 -1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Enrique Samayoa -Pineda again has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Samayoa-Pineda h as filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well

as Samayoa-Pineda’ s response. Regardless of several nonfrivolous issue s we

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 23, 2017 Lyle W. Cay ce Clerk Case: 15-50671 Document: 00513886692 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2017No. 15

- 50671

2 previously identified, it is dispositive that the Government has declined to waive the untimeliness of the appeal. See United States v. Pesina -Rodriguez , 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Therefore, without prejudice to a future 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion that Samayoa-Pineda may file, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-50671 Document: 00513886692 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2017
EXHIBIT 32-1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of MangoSoft, Inc. and Subsidiary
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dale Vincent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


By: /s/ Dale Vincent
    ----------------
    Chief Executive Officer (principal executive and financial officer)

    August 13, 2004

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### Pat PROCACCI, Petitioner, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-919.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Scott Absher, asChief Executive Officer of EntreMetrix Corporation, certify that:

1. I have		reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended		December 31, 2004 of EntreMetrix Corporation;

 

2. Based on		my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a		material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the		statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such		statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered		by this report; 

 

3. Based on		my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information		included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects		the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the		registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The		registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for		establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as		defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the		registrant and have:

 

(a)				designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such				disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our				supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the				registrant is made known to us by others within the company,				particularly during the period in which this report is being				prepared;

 

(b)				evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure				controls and procedures and presented in this report our				conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls				and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this				report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)				disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's				internal control over financial reporting that occurred during				the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's				fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has				materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially				affect, the registrant's internal control over financial				reporting; and 

 

5. The		registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our		most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to		the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's		board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)				all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the				design or operation of internal controls over financial				reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the				registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report				financial information; and

 

b)				any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or				other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's				internal controls and over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: April 6, 2005

 

/s/ Scott Absher                           

Scott Absher

Chief Executive Officer
• ?:^FV\RTMEMT OF 

Morgan Milton ,-^llnNS^lAl!!^^ 

6834 Deer Run Dr. 

Alexandria, VA 22306 

••^•-CKtt'OPERATIONS 

m m [3 P f:5 T 

Februan/ 8, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

West Building Grand Floor, Room W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Sun Country slot exemption Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

I am writing to request additional slots be authorized through this exemption 

proceeding so that Sun Country can continue its current service pattern in the 

LAN-DCA markets. I travel to Lansing often and enjoy the convenience and 

affordability that the Sun Country flight to LAN offers. Additionally, this route is 

important to the Greater Lansing's economic development efforts. 

DOT granting the Sun Country exemption would not adversely affect safety. The 

exemption merely allows Sun County to continue to operate the existing safe 

service into and out of DCA that has been successfully provided since April of 

2011. 

Please consider authorizing additional slots to allow Sun Country to continue its 

route to DCA. 

Thank you, 

Morgan Milton 

• • . 11-. - . . • •• ; 

c". ; •. • . ••! •
# ftECE\VEO

OPPT CBIC

# 70\~ JUL 25

# ~M \lt 55

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

Chambers Works

Deepwater, NJ 08023



### July 21, 2014

Director, Chemical Control Division

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room4146

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004



## Re: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003

- 0012 

## p.£CENE0**~\}()"'** 

## -nr.\(Ei ceNiER

EPAU'o'-



## DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100

PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples

June 2014 Sample Data

Dear Chemical Control Division: CBIC 

### Control Number 

# 361151

Attached please find summaries ofPFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A inJune 2014. In 

### accordance with the

current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are provided

to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures

include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this monitoring period.

# sm~

# Amu~arajasffigam "

Area Manager-Secure Environmental Treatment

DuPont Chambers Works

AJ/clc

Enclosures

## Copy to:

Document Control Office

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 6428

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only)

Principal Environmental Engineer

NJDEP Division of Water Quality

Bureau of Water Surfacing

Mail Code 401-02B

401 E. State Street

P.O. Box 420

Trenton, NJ 08625-0420AnalytePFOASampleIDDateTop(ft)Total(T)/Bottom(ft)unitsDiss.(D)Duplicate#ug/LTSummaryofAnalyticalResults662-June2014662-GRAB 662-GRAB662-GRAB 662-GRAB662-GRAB6/2/14 6/9/146/16/14 6/23/146/30/140000000000111112.152.552.461.773.92..PFOA=PerfluorooctanoicAcidug/L=microgramsperLiter·--Iug/L-microgramsperliterorpartsperbillion(ppb)LOQ=limitofquantification=0.100ug/LIISampleswereanalyzedbyCriticalPathServicesLLC.Reportedresultsrepresentasingleanalysis,exceptforthesamplecollectedon6/23/14.Acceptableprecisionwasobtainedandthereportedresultforthesamplecollectedon6/23/14representstheaverageoflabduplicateresults.1ITheNJDEPlabcertificationnumberforCriticalPathServicesLLCisPA072.<andND=NondetectatstatedreportinglimitPage1of1!Copyofcwk662grabresultsjun14.xls:Sheet17/21/20143:24PM
252 La. 111

#### BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the FIREMEN’S PENSION AND RELIEF FUND OF the CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, the Council of the City of New Orleans, John J. Petre et al.

No. 49183.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1968.

In re: City of New Orleans, the Council of the City of New Orleans, John J. Petre et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 207 So.2d 168.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      Article 5 Financial Data Schedule for 1996 10-K
 
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000756767
<NAME>                        TELS Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                            31,980
<SECURITIES>                                      62,399
<RECEIVABLES>                                    982,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                     127,852
<INVENTORY>                                      750,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,053,004
<PP&E>                                         2,265,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,371,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,112,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,545,337
<BONDS>                                          235,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          77,835
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,253,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,112,377
<SALES>                                        6,728,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,728,816
<CGS>                                          3,842,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,039,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  36,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  10,196
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               122,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (378,074)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (29,379)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (348,695)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (78,486)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (427,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.11)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             933
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,491
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,197
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,506
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,522
<LOANS>                                         96,086
<ALLOWANCE>                                        772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,519
<DEPOSITS>                                      81,920
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                999
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,278
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 118,519
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,987
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,120
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    84
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,191
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,665
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,417
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,774
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      638
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (132)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (803)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.33
<LOANS-NON>                                        793
<LOANS-PAST>                                       291
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   608
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      516
<RECOVERIES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  772
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0088 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM233AD

A320 - 32 - 1310, R01 --- 6/23/11 A320 - 32 - 1336 --- 9/19/07 A320 - 32 - 1369 --- 3/26/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
#### Daniel Dale WHISENANT and Richard Bowen, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-737.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
FILED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V EN T HC IR C U IT DECEMBER 28, 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 14650 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 5 - 0 1 3 2 7 - CV - T- 3 0 - M SS CY N TH I A S. PH I LLI PS, P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s A M E R I C A N A I R L I N E S , I N C ., D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( D e c e m b e r 28, 2006) B efo re W IL S O N , P R Y O R an d H IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es.2

P E R C U R I A M: T hi s c a s e w a s br oughta nd s e t t l e d. T he pa r t i e s a c c e pt e d the be ne f i t s of the r e l e a s e a nd s e t t l e m e nta gr e e m e nt . W i th buy e r ’ s r e m or s e , pl a i nt i f f r e tur ne d t o the di s tr i c tc our ta nd a s ke d tha tthe c a s e be r e ope ne d. T he di s tr i c tc our tf ound tha tthe pl ai nt i ff’ s c as e had been ful l y a nd fi nal l y r es ol ved b y s ett l em ent . T he m att erw as di s m i s s e d a nd the c a s e c l os e d. N o a ppe a l w a s t a ke n. N o w p l ai n t i ff retu rn s t o th e d i stri ctco u rtfo r a t h i rd t i m e o n th e sam e fact s, thi s t i m e c l ai m i ng a bre ac h o f the se t t l em entagre em ent , i n t hatshe pre se rved her r ig h t to a d d itio n a l lo s t w a g e s . D e f e n d a n t, w h ile c o n c e d in g p la in tif f p r e s e r v e d th is r i ght , c ont e nds tha ti ta l s o pr e s e r ve d i t s r i ghtt o a c c e ptorr e j e c the rc l a i m . H e r e the defe nd antcl ai m s thati tdeni ed her cl ai m , the m att eri s over a nd do ne w i th, and, as a m att erof l aw , pl ai nt i ff’ s c l ai m i s bar re d b y the do ctri nes of r e s ju d ic a ta or col l at er al es t op pel . W e a gree . W e h a v e c a r e f

u lly r e v ie w e d th e r e c o r d in th e c a s e , th e s e ttle m e n t a g r e e m e n t, th e b r i e f s a n d th e a r g u m e n t s o f

c o u n s e l c o n t a i n e d th e r e i n . F i n d i n g n o e r r o r , we a f f i r m the j udgm e ntof

the di s tr i c tc our tba s e d upon the w e l l r e a s one d tw e l ve - pa ge re po rtand recom m endat i on of the m agi stra t e j ud ge dat ed M ay 26 , 20 06 , as a d o p te d b y th e d is tr ic t c o u r t. AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Brian R. Schaefgen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Brian R. Schaefgen 
|Brian R. Schaefgen     
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 3, 2005       



The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, an insurance corporation, Appellant, v. UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an insurance corporation, Appellee.

No. P-361.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 4, 1973.

E. Robert Williams, of Boyd, Jenerette, Leemis & Staas, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Carl D. Dawson, of Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Boyer, Sulik & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s final judgment awarding appellee $2,000.00 as its prorata share of an insurance claim resulting from an automobile accident involving an uninsured motorist.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, the briefs filed herein and oral argument of able counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we are of the opinion that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the judgment appealed herein and the same is therefore affirmed upon the authority of Allstate Insurance Company v. Dairyland Insurance Company, Supreme Court of Florida, 271 So.2d 457, opinion filed November 29, 1972.

Affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel., Marcus GROSSMAN, Relator, v. The Honorable Hal P. DEKLE, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida and Maureen Sklover Grossman, Respondents.

No. 67-817.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 13, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.