alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstInvestors Financial Services, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bennie H. Duck, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  Sept 8, 2005

 
|   | By: /s/ Bennie H. Duck  |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Bennie H. Duck          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Endeavor Unmanned Solutions, LLC

 senseFly eBee Checklist

1. 72 - 24 HOURS BEFORE FLIGHT: 

 NOTAM filed (1-877-487-6867)

2. MORNING OF FLIGHT:

 Verify NOTAM

 Check weather

 Batteries (fully charged) – Go/No Go

 Micro SD Card (installed; check available space) 

 Tablet (check fully charged)

 Radio / Radio Batteries - ICOMM and VO (check) – Go/No Go

 CHECK COMPLETE

3. SENSEFLY EBEE UAV PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST

 Body and Wings (Check for cracks and other damage)

 Pitot Probe (attach, free of obstructions)

 Propeller (install with two (2) rubber bands)

 Camera and Compartment Lid (install)

 Wings (install)

 UAS (place on a level surface)

 Battery (install)

 Automatic Self-Checks (verify complete) – Go/No Go

 CHECK COMPLETE

4. SENSEFLY EBEE COMPUTER PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST

 Ground Modem to Computer (connect)

 eMotion Program (launch)

 Flight Plan (construct and upload to eBee)

 GPS Satellite (verify reception) – Go/No Go

 VO Move into Position

 Radio Check with VO – Go/No Go

 Radio Call (to Tower or nearby airport as required) – Go/No Go

 CHECK COMPLETE

5. SENSEFLY EBEE TAKE-OFF CHECKLIST

 Launch Site (select)

 Wind Direction (determine)

 UAS (power on – three (3) shakes fore and aft)

 Launch UAS (into the wind)
 CHECK COMPLETE

6. SENSEFLY EBEE IN-FLIGHT CHECKS

 Visual Contact (Maintain) – Go/No Go

 Battery Level (Monitor)

 CHECK COMPLETE

7. SENSEFLY EBEE BEFORE-LANDING CHECKLIST

 Battery Level (check – no lower than 30%)

 Return Route (clear, safe for landing)

 Return Home (select if required)

 Battery Level at Time of Landing (no lower than 23%)

 Land UAS (on a level surface)

 CHECK COMPLETE

8. SENSEFLY EBEE AFTER LANDING CHECKLIST

 Battery (remove)

 eBee (inspect)

 Propeller (remove)

 Radio Call (to Tower or nearby airport as required)

 Radio Call to VO

 CHECK COMPLETE
No. 00-1105.

#### Youngblood, Individually and on Behalf of Youngblood & Associates P. L. L. C. *v.*Prudential Insurance Company of America et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 22

- 00029

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 431st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Cou rt No. 21

- 5447

- 431

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### M ARK 

### C. B OULDIN


### , Appellant

V



### .

UMB B ANK


### , N.A., AS 

### T RUSTEE 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant ’ s “ Opposed Motion t o Dismiss Appeal a nd

Extend Time t o File Appellant’s Brief

. ” Previously

, o n May 5, 2022, w e granted the

part of appellant ’ s motion requesting an extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief. We

now grant th e part of appellant ’ s motion requ esting dismissal of the appeal, and,

accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App . P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : May 19, 2022
December 17, 2014 

Dennis J. McLerran, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region l 0 

1200 Sixth Avenue 

Mail Code: RA-140 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Headquarters 

811 SW Sixth Avenue 

Portland, OR 97204-1390 

(503) 229-5696 

FAX (503) 229-6124 

TTY: 711 

RE: Withdrawal of Oregon Administrative Rule 340-200-0040 from State Implementation Plan 

Dear Dennis: 

As the Governor's designee for the Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan, the Oregon 

Department of Environmental Quality requests withdrawal of Oregon Administrative Rule 340-200-

0040 from the State Implementation Plan. 

DEQ is withdrawing OAR 340-200-0040 from the Klamath Falls attainment plan submission in 2012. 

DEQ adopts amendments to OAR 340-200-0040 as part of Oregon's SIP process. This rule contains the 

date Oregon adopted revisions to the SIP, but it does not contain information for inclusion into the 

federally-approved SIP and does not need EPA approval. DEQ therefore withdraws OAR 340-200-0040 

as part of the Klamath Falls attainment plan submission that is currently under consideration by EPA. 

Thank you for your assistance with revisions to Oregon's SIP. If you need additional information or 

have questions, please contact Andrea Gartenbaum, SIP Coordinator at (503) 229-5946. 

Sincerely, 

J~~i Aammond, 

Deputy Director 

CC David Collier, DEQ AQ Planning 

Paul Koprowski, EPA Oregon Operations office 

Justin Spenillo, EPA, Region 10 

Andrea Gartenbaum, DEQ SIP Coordinator 

Rob bye Lanier, Lane Regional Air Protection Agency
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Billy TAYLOR.

No. 61226.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 22, 1978.

James J. Gleason, III, Director, Office of Indigent Defender, Covington, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Woodrow Erwin, Dist. Atty., Julian Rodrigue, Abbott J. Reeves, Asst. Dist. Attys., Research and Appeals, for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Billy Taylor was charged by indictment with aggravated homosexual rape. La.R.S. 14:43. Prior to trial, the indictment was amended to charge him with attempted aggravated rape only. After a trial by jury, the defendant was found guilty as charged and sentenced as a multiple offender to imprisonment at hard labor for a term of eighty-one years. On appeal, defendant relies upon eight assignments of error for reversal of his conviction and sentence.

We have reviewed the record and find no merit in defendant’s assignments of error. Accordingly, we affirm his conviction and sentence.
2! 4 ne
>

~ TOWNSHIP OR OTHER DIVISION OF COUNTY —_

51
52
53

55
56
57
58

i a

STATE...
COUNTY

NAME OF INCORPORATED PLACE

[D1—s78]

|

Seas} -

ENUMERATION DisTRICT No.A2____

ee
.....-. DAY OF _¥ . 1920.

SUPERVISOR'S. DISTRICT mee

) wai CITY PS, MS
NAME OF INSTITUTION [lniserd anne of fastlintion, Wamp, usd nSicate te Uses oa wile the vaisles are eanden” ies taaivastiams} ENUMERATED BY ME ON THE... 7)... = A ; 4é Z _ EN
LL = f each h 1 f abod ry . = =F aa e as cuzwers v8 or ee a
ff a 0 ae te nae : i nha Fe 3 3 ql ile ; 8 Pisce of birth of each person and parents of each person SSEiaeddiuee Star tones (ot the state territery. fof foreign birth, give the place of birth 3 ; |
Fle mecemmvrentmmrmenin | SS VENTED | |e ede Ev | = se a | "Rees | eet
Be BEES conti ale i ea éls|s|2|s \3 : Ht Hi ei EE si H Place of birth. Mother tongue. Place of birth. | Mother tongue. Pisce of birth. | Mother tongue. i pis Spas
ol a G 7/8] o| 1 | a2 | a2 | as | 24 | a5 | ae | a7 | 18 19 20 31 23 i. 24 25 38 | 37
at g
Cay dead Vhs 59 = . = san
SES es GG Atal WA» » 4M) if | Me. A SI0p._. ats | KZ. nna AA Ls ssa aA yo 7 Le PRT
les! |221. A = "dce de
Fi Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau. i
\ —— Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.
etic Z, Czep:
alee y eet PY Rereen PONS Fd |_| lol LL EGU Gall Vea fen Raliel Lf. LEU _Z. (Ze oak Y 5s) Xe |
¥ ee J2 = Ch Cr I _ 4 p )
(eet 3 P hfe ACT eee =
pe =f i mn Pert
g —— U A AZ _
Se AL | | —— — — 4 = 2 Z — —
Dis) | | VAAN i leaps 2. Conshasele
Elis a rez Vesal bo tahude
—— oe bs a
is lod. é
s BH Chace. nF... Ale Le. =
| = [oa o_O, Vy i PD [_
| ——_
oe Be A bat... (» Dalene : | 4 TRE
/ ee A al 2 z zig MeleCanckeccbeas)
a bx felon or as = 2 Sea
——. SF a : =
3) ! y a / os 7 AY,
rd He att ethos ee y ¢ ¥ = 7 si
Deal Yok: F
doe Le v
— Zz
: ) 2.
| | Lt | Plo
! | aS Z = : bs
ee iy cree
Ls Re aa Cth, Za 3 a! 3 =
————_ a ; 4
Y if ; ee L oe a
l 4 — fc p
= 7 g ZZ,
| | ES 3 <2 Le

B17 54

52 77S

53
54 7£6

567 x?

57
wr?

aoa
62 725

65
66
er 2 OF

eo 7 7/
70

2 S2F
#### Tony MIRRA and Dolly Mirra, Appellants, v. John H. MARLOWE, Jr., individually and d/b/a John H. Marlowe, Jr., Realtor and Ralmar, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 71-408.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 1, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 10.3(b)

    

    

    SCHEDULE A TO EXHIBIT 10.3(a)

    

    

    The following individuals entered into director retirement agreements with The Ohio Valley Bank Company which are identical to the Third Amended and
      Restated Director Retirement Agreement, dated December 18, 2012, between Thomas E. Wiseman and The Ohio Valley Bank Company filed herewith.

    

    

    	
            Name

          	 	
            Date of Agreement

          
	 	 	 
	
            Harold A. Howe

          	 	
            December 18, 2012

          
	 	 	 
	
            David W. Thomas

          	 	
            December 18, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Career Development Programs in Diabetes Research for Endocrinologists.                    

*Date:*                         July 25, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Thomas A. Tatham, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7021, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-3993,                         *tathamt@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 18, 2018. 

David D. Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-15747 Filed 7-23-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Certified Public Accountant
















Board of Directors
Highlands Bankshares, Inc.


   We consent to the use of our report, dated January 31, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. as of December 31,
2002 and 2001, and the related statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 2002, which report appears on page 26 in the December 31, 2002
Annual Report to Shareholders of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. and page 54 of this
10-K.



                                    /s/ S. B. Hoover & Company, L.L.P.





Harrisonburg, VA
March 26, 2003
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50860

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Hector Cervantes-Resendiz, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-381-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Hector Cervantes-Resendiz appeals the sentence imposed following 

his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after having previously been 

removed, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Cervantes-Resendiz 

contends, for the first time on appeal, that it violates the Constitution to treat 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50860 Document: 00516216063 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2022
No. 21-50860

2

a prior conviction that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b) as a 

sentencing factor, rather than as an element of the offense. CervantesResendiz concedes that this issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. 

United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for 

future review. In addition, he has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

disposition. 

As Cervantes-Resendiz concedes, the sole issue raised on appeal is 

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 

553-54 (5th Cir. 2019); United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 

2014). Because his position “is clearly right as a matter of law so that there 

can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case,” Groendyke 

Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), summary 

disposition is proper. Accordingly, Cervantes-Resendiz’s motion for 

summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court 

is AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50860 Document: 00516216063 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2022
#### Bishop FOGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1043.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 19, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William F. Hunter, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 444]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant’s factual recitation during the plea allocution raised the possibility of the defense of intoxication, County Court conducted the requisite further inquiry with respect to that possible defense *(see, People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666). We conclude that the plea was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered *(see, People v Harrell,*278 AD2d 852). (Appeal from Judgment of Livingston County Court, Alonzo, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hayes, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.
#### Dean KILGORE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 72-269.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 21, 1972.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### John E. MUNGER, Appellant, v. Jean P. MUNGER, Appellee.

No. 70-567.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1971.

*773Joseph D. Farish, Jr., of Farish & Farish, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

R. T. Shankweiler, of Patterson, Malo-ney & Frazier, Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this case is John E. Munger, the plaintiff in a suit for divorce in the trial court. The appellee was the defendant below. She was awarded a divorce upon issues made by her counterclaim, alimony in the amount of $1.00 per year, lump sum alimony, and by a post-de-cretal order dated 25 June 1970 a $2,000.00 attorney's fee. There are only two issues properly . presented on this appeal. The first is whether or not the award of $1.00 per year periodic alimony was error. The second issue is whether or not the award of $2,000.00 for attorney’s fees for the ap-pellee’s attorney was justified by evidence.

On the basis of the briefs, the record on appeal, and the oral argument, it is our opinion that the award of periodic alimony in the amount of $1.00 per year was entirely consistent with the evidence which showed both the need of the wife and the ability of the husband to pay. As an alternative basis for affirming this award, it is our opinion that the award may be looked upon as simply a reservation of jurisdiction over the issue of periodic alimony, and such a reservation of jurisdiction is authorized by the provisions of F.S.1969, section 61.08, F.S.A., even though an immediate award of periodic alimony is denied. Carmody v. Carmody, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 40; Steele v. Steele, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 873, 875, and Dings v. Dings, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 227.

The second issue deals with the allowance of $2,000.00 to the appellee’s attorneys for their services in the trial court. While this issue is admittedly a close one, it is our opinion that the award is supported by the evidence of the value of the services rendered and the appellant’s apparent earning capacity.

For the foregoing reasons, the amended final judgment from which the present appeal has been taken is affirmed.

WALDEN and REED, JJ., and DRIVER, B. J., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Ceferino PEREZ, Appellant, v. M & M DREDGING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., and Village of Bal Harbourt, Inc., Appellees.

No. 70-157.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### LOUISIANA COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS v. William D. LYONS.

No. 9283.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 29, 1973.

Richard A. Dowling, New Orleans, for appellant.

R. Gray Sexton, Baton Rouge, for ap-pellee.

Before LOTTINGER, ELLIS and CRAIN, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

This is an appeal by William D. Lyons, Sr., from a decision of the Louisiana Commission on Governmental Ethics, dated September 20, 1972, the decretal portion of which reads as follows :

> “Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to the authority vested in it by Section 1121(A)(1) of the Code, does hereby direct the Governor, as the respondent’s appointing authority, to instruct Lyons that he must immediately cease the renting or leasing of premises from Frank O’Donnell or from any other individual who directly or indirectly conducts activities or operations regulated by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.

> “In the event this prohibited activity is discontinued by the respondent within 15 days of rendition of this Opinion, no disciplinary action will be levied.”

The record affirmatively shows that Mr. Lyons had discontinued the reprobated conduct prior to the date of the public hearing, which was held on May 23, 1972.

*507There is, therefore, no basis for the order handed down by the Commission, the matter having become moot as of the time of the May 23, 1972, hearing.

The decision appealed from is therefore reversed with the Commission to pay the costs for which it may be responsible under the law.

Reversed.
EXHIBIT 21

List of Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries of Orion HealthCorp, Inc. at December
31, 2006

Subsidiary Name                           State of Incorporation or Organization
---------------                           --------------------------------------
Baytown SurgiCare, Inc. (1)                        Texas

Bellaire ASC, LP (2)                               Texas

Bellaire SurgiCare, Inc. (1)                       Texas

Dennis Cain Physician Solutions, Ltd. (2)          Texas

Integrated Physician Solutions, Inc.               Delaware

Medical Billing Services, Inc.                     Texas

On Line Alternatives, Inc.                         Alabama

On Line Payroll Services, Inc.                     Alabama

Rand Medical Billing, Inc.                         California

Town & Country SurgiCare, Inc. (1)                 Texas


----------
(1) Merged into Orion HealthCorp, Inc. on January 18, 2007
(2) Partnerships cancelled on January 18, 2007
# ENCLOSURE 4:

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO40 CFR§ 51 .102 ANDAPPENDIX VOF 40 CFR PART 51CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 40 CFR§ 51 .102 & APP . VOF 40 CFR PART 51 REGARDING REVISIONS TOVERMONT'S STATE IMPLEMENTATION (SIP) As required by 40 CFR § 51 .102(f), I hereby certify that the requirements of 40 CFR § 51 .102(a)-(d) were met and that the public notice and hearing procedure followed was consistent with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, as applicable. Public notice of the proposed amendments to Vermont's Air Pollution Control Regulations and revisions to Vermont's SIP was posted online on November 3, 2010 at https ://secure.vermont .gov/SOS/rules/index.php and published on November 11, 2010in the Secretary of State's newspapers of record. The public was initially provided with the opportunity to comment until December 13, 2010 . This deadline was subsequently extended until December 17, 2010 . In addition, a public hearing was held on December 6, 2010 at 6:OOpmin the Auditoriumin the Pavilion Office Building located at 109 State Street in Montpelier, Vermont.

Richard A

. Valentinetti Certifying Officer
#### Edward W. DOYLE, Appellant, v. Francis C. MILLICAN, as Executor of the Estate of Frederick B. Mahle, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 69-1.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 17, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 17, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.