alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1070

AN ACT

To provide that certain politically appointed Fedficers, and for other purposes. to prohibit cash awards to Executive Schedule of- certain period during a Presidential election year, eral officers may not receive cash awards for a
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1070

AN ACT

To provide that certain politically appointed Federal officers

may not receive cash awards for a certain period during

a Presidential election year, to prohibit cash awards to

Executive Schedule officers, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1070 ES

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CASH AWARDS TO CERTAIN

2 FEDERAL OFFICERS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 45 of title 5, United

4 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 4507

5 the following new sections:

6 ‘‘§ 4508. Limitation of awards during a Presidential

7 election year

8 ‘‘(a) For purposes of this section, the term—

9 ‘‘(1) ‘Presidential election period’ means any

10 period beginning on June 1 in a calendar year in

11 which the popular election of the President occurs,

12 and ending on January 20 following the date of such

13 election; and

14 ‘‘(2) ‘senior politically appointed officer’ means

15 any officer who during a Presidential election period

16 serves—

17 ‘‘(A) in a Senior Executive Service position

18 and is not a career appointee as defined under

19 section 3132(a)(4); or

20 ‘‘(B) in a position of a confidential or pol21 icy-determining character under schedule C of

22 subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of

23 Federal Regulations.

24 ‘‘(b) No senior politically appointed officer may re25 ceive an award under the provisions of this subchapter

26 during a Presidential election period.
3

•S 1070 ES

1 ‘‘§ 4509. Prohibition of cash award to Executive

2 Schedule officers

3 ‘‘No officer may receive a cash award under the pro4 visions of this subchapter, if such officer serves in—

5 ‘‘(1) an Executive Schedule position under sub6 chapter II of chapter 53; or

7 ‘‘(2) a position for which the compensation is

8 set in statute by reference to a section or level under

9 subchapter II of chapter 53.’’.

10 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

11 The table of sections for chapter 45 of title 5, United

12 States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relat13 ing to section 4507 the following:

‘‘4508. Limitation of awards during a Presidential election year.

‘‘4509. Prohibition of cash award to Executive Schedule officers.’’.

Passed the Senate November 24 (legislative day, November 23), 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34880-34881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15664]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Johnson 
Matthey Inc.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration on or before September 21, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division 
(``Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, 
appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on May 
31, 2018, Johnson Matthey Inc., 2003 Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New 
Jersey 08066-1742 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of 
the following basic class of controlled substance:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Controlled  substance                Drug code   Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opium tincture..................................        9630          II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the above-listed controlled 
substance in bulk for distribution to its customers.


[[Page 34881]]


    Dated: July 12, 2018.
John J. Martin,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-15664 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Charles Anthony TURNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1146.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 10, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 20, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 20, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0311. MACON-BIBB COUNTY v. CARL HODGE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 19CV70509
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 774 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 774

 Honoring the life, accomplishments, and legacy of Louis Zamperini and 
                 expressing condolences on his passing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2014

     Mr. Reed (for himself and Ms. Waters) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the life, accomplishments, and legacy of Louis Zamperini and 
                 expressing condolences on his passing.

Whereas Louis Silvie ``Lou'' Zamperini was born on January 26, 1917, to Anthony 
        and Louise Zamperini, in Olean, New York;
Whereas Louis Zamperini represented the United States in the 1936 Olympics in 
        Berlin as a distance runner;
Whereas Louis Zamperini graduated from the University of Southern California in 
        1940 and enlisted in the United States Army Air Corps in 1941, earning 
        the rank of lieutenant;
Whereas in May 1943, Louis Zamperini's B-24 bomber malfunctioned and crashed 
        during a search-and-rescue mission over the Pacific Ocean, leaving him 
        and 2 other individuals stranded;
Whereas Louis Zamperini survived for 47 days adrift in a life raft with Second 
        Lieutenant Russell Phillips before being captured by Japanese forces and 
        placed in a prisoner of war camp;
Whereas for more than 2 years, during his imprisonment, Louis Zamperini endured 
        brutal treatment and forced labor with courage and resilience;
Whereas upon the conclusion of World War II, Louis Zamperini was released from 
        the prisoner of war camp in September 1945;
Whereas Louis Zamperini was promoted to captain and awarded multiple 
        distinguishing military honors, including the Purple Heart, the 
        Distinguished Flying Cross, and the Prisoner of War Medal;
Whereas Louis Zamperini was given the honor of carrying the Olympic flame in 
        1984, 1996, and 1998;
Whereas in the years after World War II, Louis Zamperini traveled as an 
        inspirational public speaker, using his experiences to inspire a message 
        of forgiveness;
Whereas the airport in Torrance, California, was named ``Zamperini Field'' in 
        honor of Louis Zamperini; and
Whereas Louis Zamperini leaves a legacy as a national hero and an inspiration to 
        future generations: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the life, accomplishments, and legacy of Louis 
        Zamperini; and
            (2) extends heartfelt sympathies and condolences to the 
        family of Louis Zamperini.
                                 <all>
```
#### HANEY CHEVROLET, INC., Appellant, v. Douglas E. ROOT and Martha S. Root, his wife, Appellee.

No. 71-479.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 25, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 1972.

William M. Rowland, Jr., of Rowland & Petruska, Orlando, for appellant.

Thomas E.' Kirkland, of Kirkland & Kirkland, Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., MAGER, J., and CARLTON, CHARLES T., Associate Judge, concur.
#### David BULLARD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-12.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 35276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Administration for Community Living; Notice of Federal Review of 
the Puerto Rico State Council on Developmental Disabilities (SCDD) and 
the Protection and Advocacy System (P&A)

AGENCY: Administration for Community Living, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Representatives of the Administration on Intellectual and 
Developmental Disabilities (AIDD), Administration for Community Living 
(ACL), will be conducting a federal review of the Puerto Rico State 
Council on Developmental Disabilities (SCDD) and the Protection and 
Advocacy System (P&A) on September 17-21, 2018.
    AIDD is soliciting comments from interested parties on your 
experiences with the work, program, and strategies employed by P&A and 
SDCC in meeting the needs of individuals with developmental 
disabilities and their families in Puerto Rico. You are encouraged to 
share your experiences by way of any of the following methods:
    Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b48676a796e25637e6e797f6a4b6a686725636378256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="73301f1201165d1b06160107123312101f5d1b1b005d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Telephone: 202-795-7301.
    Mail Comments To: Clare Huerta, Program Specialist, Administration 
on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Administration for 
Community Living, 330 C Street SW, 1st Floor, Washington, DC 20201.
    Comments should be received by September 10, 2018 in order to be 
included in the final report.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clare Barnett Huerta, Administration 
for Community Living, Administration on Intellectual and Developmental 
Disabilities, Office of Program Support, 330 C Street SW, 1st Floor, 
Washington, DC 20201, 202-795-7301.

    Dated: July 12, 2018.
Mary Lazare,
Principal Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-15905 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4154-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## Compressor White Paper submission

Dear Sir/Madam: Attached are Solar Turbines comments for the white paper on methane emissions from compressors. Regards, Anthony Pocengal Principal Environmental Engineer Solar Turbines Inc 858-505-8554



### Pocengal <Pocengal_Anthony@solarturbines.com> Anthony Mon 6/16/2014 11:44 PM To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>;  1 attachment Solar Turbines Comment Letter.pdf; **Page 1**  **of 1**  **Compressor White Paper submission -**  **OilandGas.Whitepapers**

**8/ 27/**  **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
#### FRISCHKORN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 7139.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 11, 1937.

Wm. A. Rhodes, of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

The court being of opinion that it is a question of fact whether the promissory note and the shares of stock received by the Frischkorn Homes Company as consideration for the transfer of all of its assets to the petitioner had a readily realizable market value within the meaning of section 202 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1921, 42 Stat. 229; and it appearing that it is a question of fact whether the taxpayer has expended all of the money received for real property taken in condemnation proceedings in the purchase of other property similar and related in use [section 203 (b) (5) of the Revenue Act of 1924, 43 Stat. 256] ; and there being substantial evidence to support the findings of the Board of Tax Appeals [Old Mission Portland Cement Co. v. Helvering, Commissioner, 293 U.S. 289, 294, 55 S.Ct. 158, 79 L.Ed. 649; Helvering, Commissioner, v. Rankin, Extr., 295 U.S. 123, 131, 55 S.Ct. 732, 79 L.Ed. 1343; Tracy v. Commissioner, 53 F.(2d) 575 (C.C.A.6)];

The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion. 30 B.T.A. 8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           1,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,233
<INVENTORY>                                     52,166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,459
<PP&E>                                         360,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,900
<BONDS>                                        140,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              336
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,321
<SALES>                                        469,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               469,136
<CGS>                                          384,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  384,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,094
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,117
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,963
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,154
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        2,207
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,947
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52


</TABLE>
01MINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0492

PARK COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL

and GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY and LUCKY MINERALS, INC.,

Defendants and Appellants,

and

TIM FOX, in his capacity as Attorney General

of the STATE OF MONTANA,

Intervenor and Appellant.

FILED

MAR 1 7 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

StSt114 nf hAnntana

ORDER

Pursuant to our Order of February 5, 2020, this cause was classified for oral

argument on Thursday, April 30, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. in the Strand Union Building,

Ballroom A on the campus of Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana. Due to

unforeseen circumstances in the operations of the Montana State University campus, the

venue and time for the oral argument has been changed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause is set for argument on Thursday, April

30, 2020, at 9:30 a.rn. in the courtroom of the Montana Supreme Court, Joseph P.

Mazurek Justice Building, Helena, Montana. No introduction will be given.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no spectators will be allowed in the courtroom.

The argument will be live-streamed and can be accessed through the Court's website at

http://stream.vision.net/IVIT-JUD/.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of

record, to Dean Paul Kirgis, Alexander Blewett III School of Law, University of

Montana, to James W. Stordahl, Court Administrator of the Eighteenth Judicial District,

03/17/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0492
to Anne Watson, Pre-Law Advisor, Montana State University, to John Mudd, Executive

Director, State Bar of Montana, and to the Honorable Brenda Gilbert, District Judge.

DATED this v- day of March, 2020.

For the Court,

//

-

Chie Justice

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000758256
<NAME>                        The Saint James Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,115
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       999,057
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,115)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### Cain *v.*Crow, Appellant.

Argued April 24, 1934.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cun-misrGHAM, Balbrige, Stabteelb, Parker and James, JJ.

*Charles Henry Fleming,*and with him *Robert Bruce. Greer,*for appellant. ;

*John J. Laffey,*for appellee.

*568October 3, 1934:

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense to plaintiff’s statement of demand. The action was in assumpsit to recover commissions alleged to be due on tbe sale of real estate.

The rule is well settled that judgment will not be entered summarily for the plaintiff on the pleadings unless his right to it is clear and free from doubt: Ashland Towson Corp. v. Kasunic, 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 496, 168 A. 502; Gordon v. Continental Casualty Co., 311 Pa. 109, 111, 166 A. 557; Chelten Ave. Bldg. Corp. v. Mayer, 306 Pa. 225, 159 A. 25. The plaintiff’s statement, in order to support such a judgment, must be self-sustaining,. and set forth such averments of facts as, if not controverted, would entitle him to a verdict for the amount of his claim: Chestnut Street National Bank v. Ellis, 161 Pa. 241, 28 A. 1082; Baldwin v. Ely, 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 233, — A. —.

In order to sustain the entry of judgment the court below was obliged to refer to, and in some degree rely upon, (1) the terms of a contract for the sale of real estate, which was not annexed to or made a part of plaintiff’s statement; and (2) the contents of a deed not made a part of plaintiff’s statement, or referred to in it, either by quoting from it or by reference to the records of the recorder’s office of Allegheny County. This it had no right to do. The judgment, being summary in character, must rest on the pleadings as filed and cannot be helped by extraneous matter.

On the pleadings, as they stand, plaintiff’s right to judgment is not sufficiently clear to warrant summary action by the court. It is not necessary, at this stage of the case, to go more fully into the facts. The issues of fact raised by plaintiff’s claim and defend*569ant’s counterclaim can best be determined after a hearing of the relevant evidence.

The judgment is reversed; defendant’s counterclaim is reinstated; and a procedendo awarded.
#### Stephen Allan SAPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-308.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 2, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 21**Exhibit 21 – List of Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries of Orion HealthCorp, Inc.   Subsidiary Name State of Incorporation or OrganizationBaytown SurgiCare, Inc. Texas   Bellaire ASC, LP Texas   Bellaire SurgiCare, Inc. Texas   Dennis Cain Management, LLC Texas   Dennis Cain Physician Solutions, Ltd. Texas   Integrated Physician Solutions, Inc.      Delaware   Medical Billing Services, Inc. Texas   San Jacinto Surgery Center, Ltd. 1 Texas   SurgiCare Memorial Village, LP 2 Texas   Town & Country SurgiCare, Inc. Texas 1 Sold effective March 1, 2006. 2 Sold effective January 31, 2006.
260 La. 681

#### John G. DISCON et al. v. SARAY, INC., et al.

No. 52068.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 8, 1972.

In re: John G. Discon et al., applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany. 255 So.2d 489.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.