alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 7.1

Financial ratios



|                                                   |  |      |      |  |      |  |      |      |  |  |      |  |  |      |      |  |  |  |      | 
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- | ---- |  |  | ---- |  |  | ---- | ---- |  |  |  | ---- | 
|Year ended 31 March                                |  | 2013 |      |  | 2012 |  |      | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |     
|Return on capital
employeda                        |  |      |      |  |      |  |      |      |  |  |      |  |  |      |      |  |  |  |      | 
|Adjustedb%                                        |  |      | 22.4 |  |      |  | 20.6 |      |  |  | 18.7 |  |  |      | 16.0 |  |  |  | 14.5 | 
|Reported  %                                       |  |      | 20.9 |  |      |  | 19.5 |      |  |  | 16.9 |  |  |      | 13.3 |  |  |  | 2.3  | 
|Interest
coverc                                    |  |      |      |  |      |  |      |      |  |  |      |  |  |      |      |  |  |  |      | 
|Adjustedb times                                   |  |      | 5.1  |  |      |  | 4.5  |      |  |  | 3.4  |  |  |      | 2.9  |  |  |  | 2.5  | 
|Reported  times                                   |  |      | 4.8  |  |      |  | 6.0  |      |  |  | 2.8  |  |  |      | 1.8  |  |  |  | 0.5  | 
|Net debt to adjusted
EBlTDAb times                |  |      | 1.3  |  |      |  | 1.5  |      |  |  | 1.5  |  |  |      | 1.6  |  |  |  | 2.0  | 
|Capital
expendituredas a percentage of
revenueb % |  |      | 13.4 |  |      |  | 13.4 |      |  |  | 12.9 |  |  |      | 12.1 |  |  |  | 14.4 | 



|a | The ratio is based on profit before taxation and net finance expense to average capital employed. Capital employed is represented by total assets less current
liabilities (excluding corporation tax, current borrowings, derivative financial liabilities and finance lease creditors) less deferred and current tax assets, retirement benefit assets, cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial assets and
investments.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|b | Before specific items.
|- | ----------------------

|c | The number of times net finance expense is covered by operating profit.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

|d | Before purchases of telecommunications licences.
|- | ------------------------------------------------
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Johnny BROOKS and Robert Dorsey v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53945.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 1973.

In re: Johnny Brooks and Robert Dorsey applying for remedial writs or writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. Hearing has been fixed in trial court and issue is moot.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Preferred Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. Date: November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Bradley E. BarksBradley E. BarksChief Financial Officer
#### DeWEERD v. BARON.

No. 36494.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 197 So.2d 616.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 13, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 13, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0213. DMAC81, LLC v. HONG HOA T. NGUYEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF TUAN MINH NGUYEN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2018CV069059
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

M.D. MODZELEWSKI, R.Q. WARD, J. R. MCFARLANE

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

SEAN M. GREEN

SERGEANT (E

- 5), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201300 363

GENERAL COURT

- MARTIAL

**Sentence Adjudged:** 22 May 2013.

**Military Judge:** LtCol Chris Thielemann, USMC.

**Convening Authority:** Commanding General, 1st Marine

Division (REIN), Camp Pendleton, CA

. **Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation:** Maj D.P. Harvey,

U SMC

. **For Appellant:** CAPT Diane Karr, JAGC, USN.

**For Appellee:** Mr. Brian Keller , Esq

.

**3 0**  **January 2014**

**---------------------------------------------------**

**OPINION OF THE COURT**

**---------------------------------------------------**

After careful c onsideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### Athalee PITRE, wife of/and Christopher SCULLY v. AMERICAN MUTUAL LIABILITY INS. CO. and Cheri A. Miranne, Jr., et al.

No. 53591.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1973.

In re: Athalee Pitre, wife of/and Christopher Scully applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. No error of law has been shown by applicant.

TATE and DIXON, JJ.,

dissent. The case should be remanded to the trial court for it to reconsider its ruling in the light of Hill v. Green, 275 So.2d 407 (La.Sup.Ct.1973).
. -s. ." . .. i / ~ : f'! 

# " ,am It)ODGE

, . t. ~ ... ;' . ; . ::' ::' . ,~ :" , - .• . ~ :< " t ; MAYOR'S OFFICE I Matt Bemr i ch , Mayor I Dav i d R.
June 25 , 2014 

### Se n t Ele ctron ic all y v ia E - M ail Mr. Kevin Schlemmer Chief , Essential Air Service Division U . S. Department of Transportation <. J Office of the Secretary of Transportation ' I 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 

# I ' RE : Request Ordering Resoliciting Essential r ir Se ie l Docket Number: OST-2001-10682; Fort Dodg Request for Comments due before Jul t ,2014 Proposals Served Ap r il 22, 2014 

# :9

Dear Mr . Schlemmer: N U l

The F ort Dodge Region al Airport commi s si 9 supp rts the two year proposal from Air Choic e One f o r Option F2 offerin g dire ct s ervic e to mbert ~ ~ I " Loui s Internation al Airport w i th 18 flights per w eek for y ear one and 2 4 flights ~ r w eek 1 f qr year t w o. Fort Dodg e and Ma son C ity worked together to strategically attempt to attract a mainline carrier to serv e both o ur communities ; ho w e ver , w ith the present airl i ne e nv ironme nt thi s effort w a s not s u c ce ssf u l at this time. The C o mmission under s tands th e US DOT re qu ires that o ur c o mmunity recei v es tw in en gi ne service ; h o wever, th e Commission is supporting the qroposal submitted by Air Choice One with the single en g ine aircr aft du e to the limite d c ho ices of th e pro p os al s s ubmi tted. Additional co n siderati on w a s gi ve n du e to the s upport pro v ide d b y the Lambert-St. Louis Internation al Airport along with the enplaneme nt and reliability history of Air Choice One in th e commu ni ti es they currentl y serv e. Th e S t . L ouis market pro v ide s access to o v er 90 So uthw e st Airli nes d ail y fli g hts plu s other mainline c arriers , offering a c o mpetiti v e fare env ironment . We understand that Air Choice One's init i al proposal exceeds the $200 per passenger cap. We expect our community to utilize the service to lower f hiS ( amount below $200
. We will respectfully await the EAS Department of Transporta t ion's decision. Re s pectfull y , " , 

# / Sa 

# 'k ! ", ' / / 7 / 

# ~z r.: b ~~~ Matt Bemrich M ay or City of Fort Dodge I 

## I I I

Munic i pal Bu i lding. 819 1st Avenue South. Fort Dodge . IA 50501 • Phone : 515 . 573.7144 • Fax : 515.573.5751 Emai l : mayorofdodge @ fondodge i owa.org
# Patent

## Title
Stereoselective process for the preparation of 2-amino-ethanol

## Abstract

It will be appreciated that the instant specification and claims are set forth by way of illustration and not limitation, and that various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

## Background
## Claims

1. An acylamino acid ester of formula II ##STR139## wherein X is C.sub.1 -C.sub.6 -alkyl, or halogen, -halogenalkyl,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUMMIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. DATED MARCH
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       8,580,164
<SECURITIES>                                31,762,314
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,455,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,816,645
<PP&E>                                       2,589,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,019,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,419,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,477
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,496,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,019,533
<SALES>                                      1,423,887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,423,887
<CGS>                                          892,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  713,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                397,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            397,218
<DISCONTINUED>                             (4,895,265)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,498,047)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification of Annual Report

 

I, Gerald McMahon, Chairman andChief Executive Officer, of NeoRx Corporation (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that:

 

1.               the Annual Report on Form 10-K for theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (12 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 1, 2006 | By:                |   |
|---------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                | /s/ GERALD MCMAHON |   |
|                | Gerald  McMahon    |   |
|                     |                    |        |  |  |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

         Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of International Wire Group,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 15, 2006                       /s/ GLENN J. HOLLER
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Name: Glenn J. Holler
                                           Title: Senior Vice President,
                                                  Chief Financial Officer and
                                                  Secretary
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1091 

To provide for the issuance of an Alzheimer’s Disease Research Semipostal 

Stamp. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2013 

Ms. MIKULSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of an Alzheimer’s Disease 

Research Semipostal Stamp. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE RESEARCH 

4 SEMIPOSTAL STAMP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to afford a convenient 

6 way for members of the public to contribute to funding 

7 for medical research relating to Alzheimer’s disease, the 

8 United States Postal Service shall issue a semipostal 

9 stamp (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Alzheimer’s Disease 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1091 IS

1 Research Semipostal Stamp’’) in accordance with the pro2 visions of this section. 

3 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—The issuance and sale of the 

5 Alzheimer’s Disease Research Semipostal Stamp 

6 shall be governed by the provisions of section 416 of 

7 title 39, United States Code, and regulations issued 

8 under such section, subject to the requirements of 

9 this subsection. 

10 (2) DURATION.—The Alzheimer’s Disease Re11 search Semipostal Stamp shall be made available to 

12 the public for a period of 6 years, beginning no later 

13 than 12 months after the date of the enactment of 

14 this Act. 

15 (3) DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS.—All amounts 

16 becoming available from the sale of the Alzheimer’s 

17 Disease Research Semipostal Stamp (as determined 

18 under section 416(d) of such title 39) shall be trans19 ferred to the National Institutes of Health, for the 

20 purpose described in subsection (a), through pay21 ments which shall be made at least twice a year. 

22 (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term 

23 ‘‘semipostal stamp’’ refers to a stamp described in section 

24 416(a)(1) of title 39, United States Code. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Willie L. HERRING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-621.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 11, 1972.

Paul Pollack and Alvin Entin, I&jami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Parnell, Fla. 1969, 221 So.2d 129; State v. Profera, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 867.
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8Nos. 33-85634, 33-89124, 333-76957, 333-49290 and 333-139969 , Form S-3 Nos. 333-124355, 333-135580, 333-135581 and 333-138061 and Form S-4 No. 333-144093) of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. of our reports dated February 28,2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

February 28, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1236 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1236

  To repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and ensure respect for State 
                        regulation of marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2013

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bennet, Mr. 
   Blumenthal, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Brown, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Cardin, Mr. 
Carper, Mr. Casey, Mr. Coons, Mr. Cowan, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Franken, Mrs. 
Gillibrand, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Heinrich, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Kaine, Mr. King, 
Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Levin, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Menendez, Mr. 
Merkley, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Murphy, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Reed, Mr. Sanders, 
   Mr. Schatz, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Udall of 
Colorado, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Ms. Warren, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mr. 
Wyden) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and ensure respect for State 
                        regulation of marriage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Respect for Marriage Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SECTION ADDED TO TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, BY 
              SECTION 2 OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT.

    Section 1738C of title 28, United States Code, is repealed, and the 
table of sections at the beginning of chapter 115 of title 28, United 
States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to that section.

SEC. 3. MARRIAGE RECOGNITION.

    Section 7 of title 1, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows:
``Sec. 7. Marriage
    ``(a) For the purposes of any Federal law in which marital status 
is a factor, an individual shall be considered married if that 
individual's marriage is valid in the State where the marriage was 
entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any 
State, if the marriage is valid in the place where entered into and the 
marriage could have been entered into in a State.
    ``(b) In this section, the term `State' means a State, the District 
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or 
possession of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. John F. HIGGINS.

No. 5865.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh-Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1936.

Howard P. Locke, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

John F. Higgins, of Chicago, 111., pro se.

Before SPARKS and EVANS, Circuit Judges, and BALTZELL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Now this day come the parties by their counsel and this cause now comes on to be heard on the printed record and briefs of counsel and on oral arguments.

On consideration whereof it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the decision entered in this cause on October 24, 1935, by the United States Board of Tax Appeals be, and the same is hereby reversed; and that this cause be, and the *1007same is hereby, remanded to the said United States Board of Tax Appeals. It is further ordered that the mandate of this court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, stayed for sixty days.
EXHIBIT 32

Officer Certification under 18 USC 1350

We, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of AXS-One Inc. (the ‘‘issuer’’), do hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

|                                 |  |  |                                                                                |
|---------------------------------|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |  |  | AXS-ONE INC.                                                                   |
| Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  | /s/ William P. Lyons                                                           |
|                            |  |  | William P. LyonsChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board               |
|                            |  |  | /s/ Joseph P. Dwyer                                                            |
|                            |  |  | Joseph P. DwyerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

----
‘ees 2 , ff
(y Sherwar I,.— Free Inhabitants i NUN 1a eg in the Courity of Nor ork. State’
of Nas Soke enumerated by me, ere actuslbeas Ass't Marshal:

SS
Families numbered

in the order. of

visitation.

| Whether deaf sind’ |
dumb, blind, insane, |

The Name of every Person whose usual place | ‘¢ 2S) Profession, Occupation, or Trade Pract oF Brern.

a

of abode on the first day of June, 1850, was of each Male Person over 15 Naming the State, Territory,

idiotic, pauper, or)
| eouceies:

in this family. eS | years of age. or Country.

order of visitation.

alue of Real Estate

owned,
within the year.

Dwelling-houses
numbered in the

1.4 MP Aint
wa | Attended School

“Married within the
Persons over 20 y'ra of age |
who cannot Fead & write.

|

tow
MY)

a |"
qo

=
||

ne ) hoon 4
»

| a mh NN ‘Anbu

ISX 0, D4 V NNYAAN

adQ55

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

444444442

E

r

Ne 7
Brann Ras pn
By, (Bathe
, MY NAAN at BS

Ne

\ N\A AN iN

Af ep

\ » {\
| \\vare: * W  VATARSS)
d ‘ * ‘

WS Qk POWs \ NIVNAK % KA.
' \\ f
ANA, (SUN

EPRI & be

EP EPEE

lee

—

Bh Pi
rE

zp

_——.

_—-

ac
No. 00-1093.

#### Brandon *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certio-rari denied.
252 La. 164

#### Edward T. SHAW v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 49218.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1968.

In re: Edward T. Shaw applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 207 So.2d 832.

Application not considered. Not filed within the time prescribed by Section 11 of Article 7 of the Constitution.