alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003
of the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
                                             -------------------------
                                             Michael E. DeDomenico
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             February 13, 2004
```
Item 14 - (a)3 Exhibit  10(t)

                                  EXTENSION OF
                          PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

      THIS  AGREEMENT  (The  Extension  Agreement)  made as of  this  1st day of
January,  1999, by and between FJS PROPERTIES  FUND I, L.P., a Delaware  Limited
Partnership ("Owner"), and M.L. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., a Florida Corporation
("Management Company").

      WHEREAS,  Owner and Management  Company have previously  entered into that
certain management  agreement (the "Management  Agreement") dated as of December
1993, for the property  management of the garden apartment  complex known as the
Pavilion Apartments, West Palm Beach, Florida, and

      WHEREAS,  the Management  Agreement by its term originally  expired at the
end of December 1998, and

      WHEREAS,  the Owner and  Management  Company  desire to further extend the
term of the Management Agreement as herein provided,

      NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

      1. The Management Agreement shall and hereby is extended for an additional
five year period to expire on December 31, 2003,  subject to the  provisions for
termination  prior to the  expiration of the term as provided in sections 3.3 of
the Management Agreement.

      2. In securing tenants for the Property,  the Management  Company shall be
authorized to employ on behalf of the Owner,  the services of unaffiliated  real
estate  brokers  and  other  similar  tenant  referral  professionals  when  the
Management Company deems it reasonably  necessary.  Commissions paid to any such
brokers  or  professionals  (which  shall in no event  exceed  those  reasonably
customary for such  services in the locality  where the Property is located) for
tenant referrals shall be at Owner's expense.

      3.  Except as  modified  herein,  all of the terms and  provisions  of the
Management Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

      4.  The   mailing   address   for   notices  to  both  Owner  and  Owner's
Representative is: 264 ROUTE 537 EAST, COLTS NECK, NJ 07722.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and
seals, or caused these presents to be signed by their proper  corporate  offices
and their proper  corporate  seal to be affixed  hereto,  the day and year first
above written.

OWNER                                 FJS PROPERTIES FUND I, L.P.
                                      by:  FJS PROPERTIES, INC., general partner


                                      by:    Andrew C. Alson
                                      -----------------------------
                                             Andrew C. Alson, president

MANAGEMENT COMPANY:
                                      M.L. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.

                                      by:    Murray Liebowitz
                                      -----------------------------
                                             Murray Liebowitz, President
#### Ex parte Roscoe B. HOGAN.

No. 77-32.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 2, 1977.

PER CURIAM.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
#### Leonard Robert SELFRIDGE, Jr., Petitioner, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Respondent.

No. 70-556.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1970.

Certiorari quashed.
Exhibit
32-1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MangoSoft, Inc. and Subsidiary (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Selig Zises, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
                  
                  /s/
      Selig
      ZisesInterim
      Chief Executive OfficerMay
      15, 2009




This
certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15588 and #15589; LOUISIANA Disaster Number LA-00086]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Louisiana dated 07/17/2018. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes and Straight-line Winds. *Incident Period:*
                         04/13/2018 through 04/14/2018.
 DATES: Issued on 07/17/2018. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/17/2018. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/17/2019.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Parishes:*
                     Caddo *Contiguous Parishes/Counties:* Louisiana: Bossier, De Soto, Red River. Arkansas: Lafayette, Miller. Texas: Cass, Harrison, Marion, Panola. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.813Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
7.160Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.580Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.580Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15588 C and for economic injury is 15589 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas. 
 
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: July 17, 2018. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-15756 Filed 7-23-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>  (replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<CIK>             0000755465
<NAME>            Sandata, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>      1
<CURRENCY>        $

 <S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     Year

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                   JUN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     MAY-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                            1,533,576
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     3,491,549
<ALLOWANCES>                        532,875
<INVENTORY>                          29,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  6,107,012
<PP&E>                           15,239,627
<DEPRECIATION>                    8,070,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   14,221,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             5,871,413
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              2,481
<OTHER-SE>                        4,252,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     14,221,179
<SALES>                          14,551,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 14,735,867
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    14,353,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   97,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     285,019
<INCOME-TAX>                        171,177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 113,842
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        113,842
<EPS-BASIC>                           .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .04


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                    GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                         Six months ended June 27, 1998

                                   (Unaudited)


(In millions)

Earnings:
   Earnings before income taxes                                   $557
   Fixed charges:
      Minority interest in net earnings of
         consolidated subsidiaries (1)                              43
      Interest expense (2)                                          24
                                                                  ----
                                                                  $624
                                                                  ====

Fixed charges:
   Minority interest in net earnings of
      consolidated subsidiaries (3)                               $ 59
   Interest expense (2)                                             24
                                                                  ----
                                                                  $ 83
                                                                  ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                7.52
                                                                  ====


(1)  Minority  interest in net earnings of  consolidated  subsidiaries  includes
     dividends on subsidiary's preferred stock.

(2)  Interest  expense  includes an amount for one-third of the rental  expense,
     which the Company  believes is a reasonable  approximation  of the interest
     factor for such rentals.

(3)  The  fixed  charges  amount  for  minority  interest  in  net  earnings  of
     consolidated subsidiaries represents the pretax earnings amount which would
     be required to cover such fixed charges as calculated below:

                Subsidiary's Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
                -------------------------------------------------
                              100% - Income Tax Rate

     The  income  tax rate is based on the  relationship  of the  provision  for
     income taxes to earnings before income taxes for the respective period.


                                        7
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ronald W. Guire, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31,
2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of Exar Corporation.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RONALD W. GUIRE                            
|Ronald W. Guire                                   
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
|Assistant Secretary and Director                  
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Raymond H. PUGH, Appellant, v. OXFORD GALLERIES, Appellee.

No. 69-1048.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Burnis N. McINNIS et ux.

No. 62813.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1978.

In re: Burnis N. Mclnnis and William J. Mclnnis, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Vernon. 360 So.2d 887.

Denied.
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rare Medium Group, Inc.:

The audit referred to in our report dated March 29, 1999, included the related
financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998,
included in the annual report on Form 10-K/A. This financial statement schedule
is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audit.
In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos.
33-37036, 33-37037, 33-85634, 33-85636, 33-89122 and 33-89124 on Form S-8, of
our reports dated March 29, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheet as
of December 31, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit), cash flows and financial statement schedule for
the year then ended which reports are included in the annual report on Form
10-K/A. Our report dated March 29, 1999, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered net losses and losses from continuing
operations, has a working capital deficiency, and has incurred accumulated
losses through December 31, 1998. These factors, raise substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

                                                      KPMG LLP
New York, New York
April 9, 1999
#### Dennis D. SALESKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. O-261, P-165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 11, 1972.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and John W. Watson, III, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Richards v. State (Fla.App.1968), 214 So.2d 31; Wilder v. State (Fla.App.1963), 156 So.2d 395.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS   The Board of Directors NeoRx Corporation:  We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-65862, 333-35442, 333-43712, and 333-45398) on Form S-3 and in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-71368, 33-43860, 33-46317, 33-87108,
333-32583 and 333-41764) on Form S-8 of NeoRx Corporation, of our report dated
January 25, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of NeoRx
Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which
report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of NeoRx
Corporation.   /s/ KPMG LLP Seattle, Washington March 27, 2002
#### John R. HAWKE and Jean O. Hawke, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. RULE POOL COMPANY, Inc., Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

No. 71-597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 22, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements Nos. 33-85634, 33-89124, 333-76957 and 333-49290 on Form S-8 and No. 333-124355 on Form S-3 of our report relating to the consolidated financial statements of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. andsubsidiaries, and the related financial statement schedule, and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated March 29, 2006, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkyTerraCommunications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Baltimore, Maryland 

March 29, 2006
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Ronald Harry EVANS, Appellant, v. The Honorable Dan SATIN, Judge for the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit, and Jack Sandstrom, Director of the Dade County Jail, Appellees.

No. 73-1056.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Pace Advertising Agency, Inc., Respondent, v Manhattan Pacific Management Company, Inc., Appellant.

[654 NYS2d 140]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered June 21, 1996, which, in a turnover proceeding, granted petitioner judgment creditor’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee, adjudged respondent garnishee in civil contempt, fined respondent $57,478.16, together with plaintiff’s costs and disbursements, including attorneys’ fees, and permitted respondent to purge its contempt by paying such fine and fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Special Referee’s rejection of most of the offsets claimed by respondent and finding that respondent owes the judgment debtor $57,478.16. The documentary evidence, and indeed respondent’s own concession that its seven prior accountings were inaccurate, constitute a clear showing of respondent’s disobedience of the court’s prior orders to provide proper accountings, prejudicing petitioner and warranting a finding of contempt. The court properly refused to permit respondent to introduce "additional offsets” that had not been included in any of the seven prior accountings after the hearing had already begun. The $57,478.16 found owing, plus petitioner’s costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, *132is an "actual loss or injury” sustained by petitioner for which respondent was properly fined (Judiciary Law § 773; *Gordon v Janover, 121*AD2d 599). We have considered respondent’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
#### Clara TINGSTROM, wife of/and Sidney ERRHARD, Sr., et al. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 53551.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1973.

In re: Melvin E. LeBlanc, Sr. and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Ascension. 274 So.2d 911.

Application denied. No error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
CHARLES J. SIMPSON, JR. 

BY HAND 

Rudy Spruill 

ZUCKERT SCOUTT b RASENBERGER, L.L.P. 

888 Seventeenth Street, NW; Washington, DC 20006-3309 

Telephone [202J 298-8660 Fax [202J 342-0683 

WY\Wzsrlawcom 

March 12,2010 

Office of Information Services 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Application of All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. 

DIRECT DIAL (202) 973-7926 

cjsimpson@ZSriaw.com 

--j 

.. -j 

for an Amended Statement of Authorization (Docket OST-2001-11127) 

Dear Mr. Spruill: 

On March 9, 2010, All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd., filed an Application for an Amended 

Statement of Authorization in the above-referenced docket. 

We have completed polling and no carrier has objected to the grant of this application. 

We respectfully request that the Department proceed to grant this application as soon as possible. 

cc: service list 

Charles J. Simpson, Jr. 

David M. Endersbee 

Counsel for All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd.