Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 35451 

rulemakings which tightened engine 

standards and required fuel 

formulations contain reduced levels of 

sulfur. See 65 FR 6698 (February 10, 

2000) and 81 FR 23641 (April 22, 2016). 

MOVES2014 modeling results indicate 

that removing the 26 counties from the 

expanded I/M program would not 

increase SO2 emissions. For these 

reasons, EPA proposes to find that 

removal of the 26 counties from the SIPapproved expanded I/M program would 

not interfere with maintenance of the 

2010 SO2 NAAQS in the State. 

vi. Non-Interference Analysis for 2008 

Lead NAAQS 

On November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964), 

EPA promulgated a revised primary and 

secondary lead NAAQS of 0.15 mg/m3. 

Under EPA’s regulations at 40 CFR part 

50, the 2008 lead NAAQS are met when 

the maximum arithmetic 3-month mean 

concentration for a 3-year period, as 

determined in accordance with 

Appendix R of 40 CFR part 50, is less 

than or equal to 0.15 mg/m3. See 40 CFR 

50.16. On November 8, 2011, EPA 

designated the entire State of North 

Carolina as unclassifiable/attainment for 

that NAAQS. See 76 FR 72907. North 

Carolina’s ambient lead levels have 

remained well below the standard. The 

pollution control systems for light-duty 

gasoline vehicles subject to the I/M 

program are not designed to reduce 

emissions for lead; therefore, removing 

counties from the program will not have 

any impact on ambient concentrations 

of lead. MOVES 2014 modeling results 

indicate that removing 26 counties from 

the expanded I/M program would not 

increase lead emissions. For these 

reasons, EPA proposes to find that 

removal of the 26 counties from the SIPapproved expanded I/M program would 

not interfere with maintenance of the 

2008 lead NAAQS in the State. 

IV. Proposed Action 

For the reasons explained above in 

Section III of this proposed rulemaking, 

EPA is proposing to approve North 

Carolina’s November 17, 2017, SIP 

revision. Specifically, EPA is proposing 

to approve the removal of Brunswick, 

Burke, Caldwell, Carteret, Catawba, 

Chatham, Cleveland, Craven, 

Edgecombe, Granville, Harnett, 

Haywood, Henderson, Lenoir, Moore, 

Nash, Orange, Pitt, Robeson, Rutherford, 

Stanly, Stokes, Surry, Wayne, Wilkes, 

and Wilson counties, from the SIPapproved expanded I/M program. 

Additionally, EPA is proposing to find 

that North Carolina’s removal of the 26 

counties from the SIP-approved 

expanded I/M program (and the removal 

of reliance on the I/M emissions 

reductions generated from those 

counties as part of the ‘‘credits’’ in 

North Carolina’s NOX emissions budget) 

will not interfere with the State’s 

obligations under the NOX SIP Call to 

meet its Statewide NOX emissions 

budget. In addition, EPA is also 

proposing to find that the removal of the 

26 counties from the SIP-approved 

expanded I/M program will not interfere 

with continued attainment or 

maintenance of any applicable NAAQS 

or with any other applicable 

requirement of the CAA, and that North 

Carolina has satisfied the requirements 

of section 110(l) of the CAA. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided they meet the criteria of the 

CAA. This action merely proposes to 

approve state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this proposed action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 

FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory 

action because SIP approvals are 

exempted under Executive Order 12866; 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), nor will it impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 16, 2018. 

Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15813 Filed 7–25–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2018–0536; FRL–9981– 

19—Region 7] 

Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Approval of 

the State Implementation Plan and the 

Operating Permits Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Iowa State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), and the 

Operating Permits Program. The 

proposed revisions clarify the types of 

mailing services that may be used for 

submitting construction and operating 

permit applications, and clarify that 

applications are not required to be 

submitted by certified mail. The 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
35452 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

1On December 29, 2009 (See 74 FR 68692), EPA 

did not act on Iowa’s provision that allowed for 

electronic submittal for construction permit 

applications (subrule 22.1(3)), and electronic 

submittal for operating permit applications (subrule 

22.105(1)) because Iowa’s electronic document 

receiving system was not approved pursuant to 

CROMERR. 

proposed revisions also eliminate the 

requirement for construction permit 

applications for projects that will not 

emit greenhouse gases (GHG) to submit 

the current separate three-page GHG 

form. In addition, a revision to the 

operating permit program is being made 

to require only one copy of the permit 

application instead of two. Finally, this 

proposed action includes minor 

grammatical corrections. EPA has 

reviewed these proposed revisions and 

determined that they will not impact air 

quality and will ensure consistency 

between the state and federally 

approved rules. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before August 27, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2018–0536 to https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Heather Hamilton, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 

(913) 551–7039, or by email at 

hamilton.heather@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section 

provides additional information by 

addressing the following: 

I. What is being addressed in this document? 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP and the operating permits program 

revision been met? 

III. What actions are proposed? 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

EPA is proposing to approve a 

submission from the state of Iowa to 

revise the Iowa SIP and Operating 

Permits Program. The proposed 

revisions to the SIP are to clarify the 

types of mailing services that may be 

used for submitting construction permit 

applications to include the U.S. Postal 

Service, private parcel delivery services, 

and hand delivery. Construction permit 

applications are not required to be 

submitted by certified mail. The 

proposed revisions also eliminate the 

requirement for construction permit 

applications for projects that will not 

emit greenhouses gases to submit the 

current three-page form. 

The proposed revisions to the 

operating permits program clarifies the 

types of mailing services that may be 

used for submitting operating permit 

applications to include the U.S. Postal 

Service, private parcel delivery services, 

and hand delivery. Operating permit 

applications are not required to be 

submitted by certified mail. This 

proposal to the operating permits 

program is being made to require only 

one copy of the operating permit 

application instead of two. 

This proposed action also includes 

minor grammatical corrections to the 

SIP for construction permit rules and 

minor grammatical corrections to the 

operating permits program rules. 

II. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP and the operating permits 

program revision been met? 

The administrative rule amendments 

in this submission were first published 

in the Iowa Administrative Bulletin as 

a Notice of Intended Action on January 

18, 2017. A public comment period was 

held from January 18, 2017, to February 

20, 2017, with a public hearing on 

February 20, 2017. EPA submitted a 

comment during the public comment 

period stating that the portion of the 

proposed amendment allowing 

submittal of a construction permit 

application or a title V operating permit 

application by email would not be 

approved until Iowa’s electronic 

document receiving system was 

approved pursuant to the Cross Media 

Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) 

at 40 CFR part 3.1 In response to this 

comment, Iowa requested an 

applicability determination from EPA. A 

response from EPA dated May 25, 2017, 

was sent to Iowa stating email 

applications would not be considered 

CROMERR compliant. 

In response to the applicability 

determination, the state of Iowa 

amended the rules to remove the 

provisions for email applications and 

republished the Notice of Intended 

Action for public comment on August 

16, 2017. A public comment period was 

held between August 16, 2017 and 

September 5, 2017, with a public 

hearing held on September 5, 2017. No 

comments were received during this 

period. The submission was sent to EPA 

on January 4, 2018, and received 

January 9, 2018. 

The state submittal met the public 

notice requirements for SIP submissions 

in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The 

submittal also satisfied the 

completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, 

appendix V. In addition, these revisions 

meet the substantive SIP requirements 

of the CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. These 

revisions are also consistent with 

applicable EPA requirements of Title V 

of the CAA and 40 CFR part 70. 

III. What actions are proposed? 

EPA is proposing to approve revisions 

to the Iowa SIP, and the Operating 

Permits Program. The proposed 

revisions clarify the types of mailing 

services that may be used for submitting 

construction and operating permit 

applications, and clarify that 

applications are not required to be 

submitted by certified mail. The 

proposed revisions also eliminate the 

requirement for construction permit 

applications or projects that will not 

emit greenhouse gases (GHG) to submit 

the current separate three-page GHG 

form. In addition, a revision to the 

operating permit program is being made 

to require only one copy of the permit 

application instead of two. Finally, this 

proposed action includes minor 

grammatical corrections. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this action, EPA is proposing to 

include in a final EPA rule regulatory 

text that includes incorporation by 

reference. In accordance with 

requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is 

proposing to incorporate by reference 

the Iowa Regulations described in the 

amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 

below. EPA has made, and will continue 

to make, these materials generally 

available through www.regulations.gov 

and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please 

contact the person identified in the FOR


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 35453 

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 

this preamble for more information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, 

this action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 

FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory 

action because SIP approvals are 

exempted under Executive Order 12866. 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTA) because this 

rulemaking does not involve technical 

standards; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

40 CFR Part 70 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Operating permits, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: July 16, 2018. 

James B. Gulliford, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40 

CFR parts 52 and 70 as set forth below: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 2 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart Q—Iowa 

■ 2. In § 52.820, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entry 

‘‘567–22.1’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.820 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED IOWA REGULATIONS

Iowa citation Title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

Iowa Department of Natural Resources 

Environmental Protection Commission [567] 

*******

Chapter 22—Controlling Pollution 

567–22.1 ........... Permits Required for New or Existing Stationary Sources.12/13/17 [Date of publication of the final rule 

in the Federal Register], 

[Federal Register citation of the 

final rule].

Electronic submittal referred to in 

22.1(3) is not SIP approved. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

PART 70—STATE OPERATING PERMIT 

PROGRAMS 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 70 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. 

■ 4. Appendix A to part 70 is amended 

by adding paragraph (s) under the 

heading ‘‘Iowa’’ to read as follows: 

Appendix A to Part 70—Approval 

Status of State and Local Operating 

Permits Programs 

* * * * * 

Iowa 

* * * * * 

(s) The Iowa Department of Natural 

Resources submitted for program approval 

revisions to rule 567–22.105. Electronic 

submittal referred to in 22.105 is not 

approved in the operating permits program. 

The state effective date is December 13, 2017. 

This revision is effective [date 60 days after 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
35454 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

date of publication of the final rule in the 

Federal Register]. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2018–15924 Filed 7–25–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 25 

[GN Docket Nos. 17–183, 18–122; DA 18– 

639] 

Notice of 90-Day Filing Window 

Extension for Earth Stations Currently 

Operating in the 3.7–4.2 GHz Band; 

Filing Options for Operators With 

Multiple Earth Station Antennas 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

International Bureau (Bureau) 

announces a 90-day extension to the 

filing window for fixed-satellite service 

(FSS) earth stations currently operating 

in the 3.7–4.2 GHz frequency band 

announced in the Public Notice (Freeze 

PN), DA 18–398. The Bureau also 

clarifies that applications to register 

multiple FSS antennas operating in this 

band that are located at the same 

address or geographic location may be 

filed in the International Bureau Filing 

System (IBFS) by using a single 

registration form and paying a single 

fee. Finally, the Bureau announces the 

availability of an additional option to 

facilitate the registration of large 

numbers of geographically diverse earth 

stations by filing an application for a 

single ‘‘network’’ license and paying a 

single fee in IBFS. 

DATES: 90-day extension of filing 

window closes October 17, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by GN Docket Nos. 17–183 

and 18–122, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal Communications 

Commission’s Website: http://

apps.fcc.gov/ecfs//. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• People with Disabilities: Contact the 

FCC to request reasonable 

accommodations (accessible format 

documents, sign language interpreters, 

CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov 

or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 888– 

835–5322. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Bair, 202–418–0945 or Paul 

Blais, 202–418–7274. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s 

document, DA 18–639, released June 21, 

2018. The full text of this document is 

available at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/ 

attachments/DA-18-639A1.pdf. It is also 

available for inspection and copying 

during business hours in the FCC 

Reference Information Center, Portals II, 

445 12th Street SW, Room CY–A257, 

Washington, DC 20554. To request 

materials in accessible formats for 

people with disabilities, send an email 

to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer 

& Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202– 

418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY). 

Background. On April 19, 2018, the 

International, Public Safety and 

Homeland Security, and Wireless 

Telecommunications Bureaus issued 

Public Notice DA 18–398 announcing a 

temporary freeze effective April 19, 

2018, on the filing of new or 

modification applications for FSS earth 

station licenses, FSS receive-only earth 

station registrations, and fixed 

microwave licenses in the 3.7–4.2 GHz 

frequency band. As a limited exception 

to the filing freeze, the International 

Bureau concurrently opened a 90-day 

window during which entities that 

operated existing FSS earth stations in 

the 3.7–4.2 GHz band could voluntarily 

file an application to register or license 

their earth stations if they were not 

currently registered or licensed in the 

IBFS, or could file an application to 

modify a current registration or license. 

The Bureau also waived the 

coordination report requirement for the 

duration of the freeze. 

90-Day Extension of Application 

Filing Window. The International 

Bureau now extends the original 90-day 

filing window announced in the Freeze 

PN for an additional 90 days, until 

October 17, 2018, in order to provide 

operators with more time to file 

applications, should they choose to do 

so. This action does not impact the cutoff date for operations eligible for the 

exception, i.e., only earth stations 

constructed and operational as of April 

19, 2018 are eligible for filing during 

this window. 

Filing Option for Operators with 

Multiple Co-Located Earth Station 

Antennas. The Bureau clarifies that 

operators with multiple receive-only 

antennas at a single geographic location 

or address may apply to register these 

antennas under a single earth station 

application and pay a single application 

fee, which is currently $435 (fee code 

CMO). 

Filing Option for Operators with 

Geographically Diverse Earth Stations. 

The Bureau announces that it is waiving 

certain sections of the Commission’s 

rules to permit operators of multiple 

geographically diverse receive-only 

earth stations to register those stations 

under § 25.115(c)(2) of the 

Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 

25.115(c)(2), which permits applications 

for ‘‘Networks of earth station operating 

in the 3700–4200 MHz and 5925–6425 

MHz bands.’’ Specifically, the Bureau 

waives the portions of § 25.115(c)(2) that 

are inapplicable to receive-only stations 

or are unnecessary as a result of the 

Freeze PN. The following procedures 

apply to applicants seeking to utilize the 

§ 25.115(c)(2) process for registration of 

receive-only earth stations during the 

filing window: Applicants must 

complete a ‘‘Lead Application’’ on Form 

312, Main Form and Schedule B; 

Schedule B should include a site ID for 

each geographic location where the 

applicant has receive-only earth stations 

and should provide the technical details 

required by the Form for each antenna 

at each site; the coordination report 

required by § 25.115(c)(2) is waived as 

described in DA 18–398; the 

requirements of paragraphs (i) and (v) of 

§ 25.115(c)(2) are waived for networks of 

receive-only earth stations; pursuant to 

DA 18–398, only earth stations 

constructed and operational as of April 

19, 2018 may file during the window, so 

the one-year construction period of 

§ 25.115(c)(2)(vii) is inapplicable. 

Fees. Applicants filing as a network of 

earth stations under § 25.115(c)(2) as 

described above must pay the fee for a 

‘‘Fixed Satellite VSAT System,’’ which 

is currently $10,620 (fee code BGV). 

Networks of receive-only earth stations 

are not subject to regulatory fees. 

This document does not contain 

proposed information collection 

requirements subject to the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– 

13. In addition, therefore, it does not 

contain any proposed information 

collection burden for small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees, 

pursuant to the Small Business 

Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public 

Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Troy Tanner, 

Deputy Chief, International Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15969 Filed 7–25–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS