alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Theodore J. White, Appellant, *v.*Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Appellee.

Submitted on briefs, December 6, 1974,

to Judge Kramer, Wilkinson, Jr. and Rogers, sitting as a panel of three.

*111January 6, 1975:

*Saul Doner,*with him *LaCheen, Doner, Lacheen, Gross & Finkel,*for appellant.

*Sydney Reuben,*Assistant Attorney General, with him *Daniel R. Schuckers,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Israel Packel,*Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This is an appeal by Theodore J. White from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming a referee’s denial of compensation.

The claimant was employed by Motor Freight Express as a driver and platform worker. On December 22, 1972, appellant and several other employees were confronted on the company’s premises by the terminal manager and the security officer who were investigating the theft of playing cards from a shipment in the company’s possession. The company representatives asked these employees to submit to a search. The testimony of the employer’s witnesses accepted by the referee and the Board was that, although the appellant first refused to be searched, he eventually submitted and that playing cards were found on his person.

Theft of an employer’s property is an obvious disregard of the standards of behavior which an employer has the right to expect from his employee and is wilful misconduct. *Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review,*11 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 535, 314 A.2d 528 (1974).

The appellant testified that he was not searched and that cards were not found on his person. He contends that he was fired for refusing to submit to what he terms an illegal and unconstitutional search of his person and that his refusal to be searched was not wilful misconduct. If *112the facts had been found as the appellant related them, the case would present the interesting legal questions he suggests. However, there was a conflict of testimony and the Board, as was its prerogative, found against the appellant’s version, as had a management-union grievance panel previously.

Order affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Floyd GRIGSBY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53897.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 1973.

In re: Floyd Grigsby applying for writ of habeas corpus and other remedial writs.

Writ denied. Upon the evidence adduced at the hearing there is no merit to this application.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs. Relator was arrested in 1960 for the crime of murder. He was found incompetent to stand trial because of mental incapacity and confined to East Louisiana State Hospital until 1965. He entered plea of guilty to murder without capital puni:.lament and was sentenced to life impi isonment. His complaint of incarceration beyond the period for parole exists because time for incarceration in the hospital was not credited to the penal sentence. His remedy is by application for clemency to pardon board.
1 From: Biscoe, Melanie

Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 2:13 PM

To: Donovan, William

Cc: Doh, Austin; Morton, Thurston; Spatz, Dana; Louie

‐ Juzwiak, Rosanna

Subject: RE: Metaldehyde revisit

Will,

During the windows upgrade I lost my metaldehyde runs, so I redid the runs using the updated model and

scenarios. They result in fairly comparable maximum peak and post

‐ breakthrough average EDWCs (they are the same

order of magnitude, anyway).

Below is a comparison table with the first row indicating the recommended EDWCs from the 2013 DWA (DP404861),

and the second row the EDWCs I ran today (they are in PPB).

Because our daily time series model output is not in PPM (it’s in PPB), I exported it to an excel file and created a column

with PPM. Two excel files are attached

‐ one file is for FL Citrus (highest peak value) and one file is for NC Coastal

(highest post

‐ breakthrough average). I have also attached the point

‐ estimates for a batch run of all the scenarios so you

have that if you want to see how other scenarios fared in this updated model run. If you have any questions, just let me

know.

Metaldehyde ground water

modeling comparison 30

‐ year simulation

(metaldehyde applied first 6 years only)

Acute

(Peak)

ug/L Chronic

(Post

‐ Breakthrough Average)

ug/L

2013 Drinking Water Assessment

PRZM

‐ GW v. 1.0 1,740

(WI Sands) 635

(WI Sands)2 Initial Scenarios

PRZM

‐ GW v. 1.07

1,880

(FL Citrus) 915

(NC Coastal) Revised Scenarios distributed

March 2014

Best Regards,



## Melanie Biscoe

Environmental Risk Branch III

Environmental Fate and Effects Division

Office of Pesticide Programs, US EPA

biscoe.melanie@epa.gov

703

‐ 305

‐ 71063 From: Donovan, William

Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 7:23 AM

To: Biscoe, Melanie

Cc: Doh, Austin; Morton, Thurston

Subject: Metaldehyde revisit

Hi Melanie,

HED is evaluating a new use petition for metaldehyde to add pea, bean, ginseng and clover uses. Last year you provided

metaldehyde EDWCs based on the turf use pattern. The highest e stimates came from the PRZM

‐ GW results, with the

acute value of 1740 ppb from the 30 year simulation. Because food and drinking water dietary risk is now at 100%

aPAD, we would like to look into running the full distribution of water numbers instead of using the point

estimate. Co uld you please send us the full result file in ppm?

Thanks for your help.

Will

William H. Donovan

US Environmental Protection Agency

OCSPP/HED/RABV

Washington, DC 20460

703

‐ 305

‐ 7330
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended  September 30,
2007 of the Company (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ Michael E. Dedomenico
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael E. DeDomenico
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                November 9, 2007
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheets for  CIMARRON-GRANDVIEW GROUP,  INC.  at March 31,1999, the Statements of
Income for  the year ended March 31, 1999,  and is  qualified in its entirety by
reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         151,078
<SECURITIES>                                    10,795
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,873
<PP&E>                                           3,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              767
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       693,949
<OTHER-SE>                                    (528,934)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,015
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,084
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,738
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,738
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        





</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

            CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND CASHIER
             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Volunteer  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Corporation")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  the President and Vice  President and Cashier of the  Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Corporation;

Date:  May 14, 2004                         By: /s/ Reed D. Matney
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Reed D. Matney
                                                President


Date:  May 14, 2004                         By: /s/ Greg Oliver
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Greg Oliver
                                                Vice President and Cashier
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of SurgiCare, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip C. Scott,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Phillip C. Scott, Chief Financial Officer(1)
April 13, 2004




----------------------------------
(1) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  SurgiCare,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  SurgiCare,  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       65
#### Betty WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R—141.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 7, 1972.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Thomas C. Turner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of her conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of second degree murder for which she was sentenced to serve thirty years imprisonment. The Public Defender filed an Anders-type brief and appellant was given thirty days to file a supplemental brief, which she has failed to do.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein and *416our consideration thereof requires a conclusion that no error was committed in the trial court. Accordingly, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
6546 Woodland Oaks Dr.

Magnolia, TX 77354

(832) 212

- 6011



### ST10 Personal Ground Station

Operating System AndroidTM
Number of Channels 10 Control Transmission Distance/Range (Optimum Conditions) FCC Compliance: Up to 800m (2624.67 ft) CE C ompliance: Up to 400m (1312.34 ft)
Robust Radio Control Modulation Yuneec Protocol Video link Frequency Band 5.8GHz Video Transmission Distance/Range (Optimum Conditions) FCC Compliance: Up to 600m (1968.5 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 300m (984.252 ft) Flight Systems Telemetry Data On Screen Display (OSD) Yes LED Backlit LCD Screen Capacitive Multi

- Touch 4.5” Tactile (Vibrating) and Audible Feedback Yes

Built

- In LiPo Battery Voltage / Capacity 3.6V/5200mAh 18.72Wh Charger Auto

- Charge Mode via Micro

- B USB Cable with AC to 5V DC USB Power Supply (Included)
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00164

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court N o. 1529557D
Before Bassel, J.; Su dderth, C.J.; and Womack, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Op inion 

### O QUAVIEN 

### W AGO NER 

### , Appellant

V


### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a ccordance with a plea bargain between the State and Appellant Oquavien Wagoner , Wagoner pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated robbery w ith a dea dly weapon, and the State agreed to dismiss another aggravated

- robber y charge in return
for Wagoner ’ s guilty plea. Wagoner filed a notice of appeal. The trial court initially signed an inaccurate certification that did not indicate that Wagoner had entered into a plea barga in but eventually signed an amended certification stating that Wagoner had entered into a plea bargain and had “ NO right of appeal. ” We notified Wagoner ’ s court

- app ointed attorne y of the trial court ’ s ame nded
certif ication and informed him that unless he filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, we would di smiss it. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We received no response.
The record reflects that Wagoner specifically waive d any pretrial motions and
al l rights of appeal as part of his plea agreement

. Therefore , in a ccordance with the
trial c ourt ’ s amended certification, we di smiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a), (d), 4 3.2(f); Chavez v. State , 18 3 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) ; Mill er v. S t ate , N o. 02

- 18

- 00 467

- CR, 2019 WL 1179421, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Mar. 14, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op., not de signated for publi cation) ; see also Ken n edy v. State , 297
S.W .3d 338, 342 (Tex . Crim. App. 2009) (explaining charge

- bargain agreement) ; Shankl e v. State , 119 S.W.3d 808, 813

– 14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) ( same)

. Per Curiam3 Do Not Pub lish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: August 8, 2019
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00032-CR

Shozo Tanaka

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

426th of Bell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 79918

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 9, 2022
#### WEE MAC CORPORATION, doing business as Commodity Options of Florida, a Florida corporation, and Wesley J. Moffatt, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, by Fred O. DICKINSON, Jr., Comptroller, as Head of the Department of Banking and Finance, Division of Securities, Appellee.

No. 73-1474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1234

To authorize the payment of Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance in accordance

with title 38, United States Code, as amended effective on December

1, 1992, in the case of certain members of the Armed Forces killed

in an aircraft accident on November 30, 1992.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 15 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To authorize the payment of Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance in accordance with title 38, United States Code,

as amended effective on December 1, 1992, in the case

of certain members of the Armed Forces killed in an

aircraft accident on November 30, 1992.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, for purposes of applying subsection (e) of section

4 1967 of title 38, United States Code, to the 13 members

5 of the Air Force killed on November 30, 1992, in the mid6 air collision of two C–141 Starlifter aircraft during a night

7 air-to-air refueling exercise near Harlem, Montana, the
2

S 1234 IS

1 amendment made by section 201 of Public Law 102–568

2 (adding such subsection to such section 1967) shall be

3 treated as having become effective on November 30, 1992

4 (rather than on December 1, 1992).

Æ
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avery Communications,  Inc. Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Thomas C. Ratchford,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Thomas C. Ratchford
-----------------------
Thomas C. Ratchford
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002

<PAGE>
Exhibit 31

                                CERTIFICATION

      I, Joseph R. Rozelle, certify that:

      1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VPGI Corp.;

      2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
 statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
 make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
 statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
 this report;

      3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
 financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
 material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
 flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
 report;

      4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
 controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
 15(e) for the registrant and have:

           a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
      such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
      us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
      which this report is being prepared;

           b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
      about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
      of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
      evaluation; and

           c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
      registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
      quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
      or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting; and

      5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
 control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
 committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
 equivalent functions):

           a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
      are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

           b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
      or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting.

 October 13, 2006

                               /s/  JOSEPH R. ROZELLE
                               ------------------------------------
                                    Joseph R. Rozelle
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Principal Financial Officer