alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Nov-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    Nov-30-1996
<CASH>                              72,179
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                      380,452
<ALLOWANCES>                       115,572
<INVENTORY>                         33,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   489,568
<PP&E>                             390,409
<DEPRECIATION>                     354,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1,363,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              460,367
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                             2,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                      2,216,668
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,809,721)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     1,363,171
<SALES>                            673,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 3,472,593
<CGS>                              605,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    1,571,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 1,844,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   4,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     51,957
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 51,957
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        51,957
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                              HARBINGER CORPORATION

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                         Three Months Ended
                                                             March 31
                                                       ----------------------
                                                        1999           1998
                                                       -------       --------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>      
Basic:

    Net income (loss) available to common
      shareholders.................................... $ 2,341       $ (1,338)
                                                       =======       ========

    Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding..............................  39,879         41,046
                                                       =======       ========

    Basic earnings (loss) per share................... $  0.06       $  (0.03)
                                                       =======       ========

Diluted:

    Net income (loss) available to common
       shareholders................................... $ 2,341       $ (1,338)
                                                       =======       ========

    Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding..............................  39,879         41,046

    Effect of potentially dilutive stock options......     567             --

    Effect of potentially dilutive warrants...........       5             --
                                                       -------       --------


    Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding assuming dilution............  40,451         41,046
                                                       =======       ========

    Diluted earnings (loss) per share................. $  0.06       $  (0.03)
                                                       =======       ========
</TABLE>




Computational Note:

         In connection with the computation of diluted earnings per share for
the quarter ended March 31, 1998 all common share equivalents have been
excluded because their impact on the Company's net loss per share is
antidilutive.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1122 

To authorize States to use assistance provided under the Hardest Hit Fund 

program of the Department of the Treasury to demolish blighted structures, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2013 

Mr. PORTMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize States to use assistance provided under the 

Hardest Hit Fund program of the Department of the 

Treasury to demolish blighted structures, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Neighborhood Safety 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1122 IS

1 SEC. 2. USE OF HARDEST HIT FUND AMOUNTS FOR DEMO2 LITION ACTIVITIES. 

3 Notwithstanding any provision of title I of the Emer4 gency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 

5 5211 et seq.), any regulation, guidance, order, or other 

6 directive of the Secretary of the Treasury (referred to in 

7 this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’), or any agreement (or 

8 amendment thereto) entered into under the Hardest Hit 

9 Fund program of the Secretary under such title I, any 

10 amounts of assistance that have been, or are, allocated for 

11 or provided to a State or State agency through the Hard12 est Hit Fund program may be used, without limitation, 

13 to demolish blighted structures. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Glen LESSOR and Mildred Lessor, his wife, Appellants, v. Donald A. DOUGLAS, Appellee.

No. 73-710.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 5, 1974.

Alfred J. Anton, Miami, for appellants.

Horton & Perse, Stanley M. Rosenblatt, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Knox v. Spratt, 23 Fla. 64, 6 So. 924; Stevens v. Gray, Fla.App.1969, 217 So.2d 350.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105

- 2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

November 9, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Conference Call with United Autoworkers to discuss the EPA/NHTSA Proposed

Rulemaking for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017

- 2025 Light

- Duty

Vehicles

FROM: William Charmley, US EPA

TO: EPA Docket # EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0799

This memo documents a conference call held on December 9, 2011 between representatives of

the United Auto Workers (UAW) and EPA to discuss the EPA/NHTSA Proposed Rulemaking

for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017

- 2025 Light

- Duty Vehicles

The confe rence call attendees from United Auto Workers included

Barbara Somson and Brad Markell from the UAW participated in the call, and from EPA the

participants included Margo Oge, Chet France, and Bill Charmley

The discussion topic was lim ited to questions from the UAW regarding the upcoming public

hearings for the Joint NPRM.
#### Warren D. SAMET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-201.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 16, 1973.

*451Martin S. Saxon and Max B. Kogen, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ. *

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against, charged with unlawful possession of marijuana in a quantity exceeding five grams in weight.

The offense charged was a felony under §§ 404.02 and 404.15(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Under said statutes the offense was a misdemeanor, if a first conviction was involved and the quantity possessed was less than five grams in weight.

The cause was tried before the court without a jury. The state failed to present any evidence as to the quantity or weight. The finding of guilt and adjudication by the court did not define or refer to the crime of which the .defendant was found guilty as being either a felony or a misdemeanor. The sentence imposed was confinement for one year in the county jail, which would have been a permissible sentence in either event. See penalty statute referred to in subparagraph (1) of § 404.15 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

In this non-jury trial, when the attorney for the defendant moved the court to treat the matter as a misdemeanor because of absence of evidence as to the weight, the court appears to have proceeded on the basis of a felony, without proof of the weight, stating: “Well, I think I can. It’s in evidence. I can look at it and I can know it’s more than five grams.” We have been shown no authority by the state to support the proposition that where proof of an offense is dependent upon a showing by the state that the weight of drugs or value of property taken (as upon a charge of grand larceny) that necessary element of the offense may be considered established beyond a reasonable doubt (with no evidence presented thereon) solely by observation of the item or property by the trier of facts.

Concededly, there could be instances where the trier of fact could readily conclude that certain property met a weight or value requirement. However, in a case such *as*this where the matter was questionable, it is essential that the evidence be submitted. It has been so held in cases relating to larceny. See Escobar v. State, Fla.App.1965, 181 So.2d 193; Suarez v. State, Fla.App.1962, 136 So.2d 367; and Lambert v. State, Fla.App.1959, 111 So.2d 68.

Accordingly, as contended for by the appellant, the sentence imposed by the court is set aside. The cause is remanded to the trial court with direction to amend the judgment to designate the offense of which the defendant was found guilty as being a misdemeanor, and for reimposition of sentence thereon as provided for under the appropriate statute.

It is so ordered.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Brian R. Schaefgen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Brian R. Schaefgen 
|Brian R. Schaefgen     
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 8, 2007            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1151 

To reauthorize the America’s Agricultural Heritage Partnership in the State 

of Iowa. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2013 

Mr. HARKIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the America’s Agricultural Heritage 

Partnership in the State of Iowa. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘America’s Agricultural 

5 Heritage Partnership Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE AMERICA’S AGRICUL7 TURAL HERITAGE PARTNERSHIP. 

8 Section 707 of division II of the Omnibus Parks and 

9 Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1151 IS

1 note; Public Law 104–333) is amended by striking ‘‘Sep2 tember 30, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2023’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an Agency of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. CLEARY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. O-375.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 16, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1971.

Geoffrey B. Dobson, Tallahassee, for appellant.

J. Rex Farrior, Jr., of Shackleford, Far-rior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State Department of Transportation seeks reversal of the final summary judgment entered in favor of Cleary Brothers Construction Company for the full amount of withheld payments in connection with the construction and repair of the Plum-mers Point Bridge.

Having previously moved for a summary judgment in its favor, appellant now contends that summary judgment against it was improper because the questions of the duty and negligence of the parties were clearly ones for the jury.

We have fully and carefully considered the record on appeal, briefs and oral argument of the parties. It appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the summary judgment appeal is erroneous, the said judgment is therefore affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Missouri River and Gold Gem Corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martyn A. Powell, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Missouri River and Gold Gem Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 17, 2004

/s/Martyn A. Powell

Martyn A. Powell

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### Grover C. CRISWELL, d/b/a Criswell’s Money Museum, Petitioner, v. BRINKS SIGNAL CO., Inc., Respondent. Irving M. MOSKOVITZ, Petitioner, v. BRINKS SIGNAL CO., Inc., Respondent.

No. 41071.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 26, 1972.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 1972.

Allgood, McPherson & Cobb, New Port Richey, Marks, Gray, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, and Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey, Kinney & Boggs, Tampa, for petitioners.

Thomas A. Clark and William F. McGowan, Jr., of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, 245 So.2d 265, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this Court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record, we are now led to conclude. that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and DREW, J. (retired), concur.

ROBERTS, C. J., dissents.
#### Wright *v.*State.

(Division A.

June 10, 1935.)

[161 So. 870.

No. 31665.]

Lee M. Russell, of Jackson, for appellant.

*243W. D. Conn, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, for the state.

*244Argued orally by Lee M. Russell, for appellant, and by W. D. Conn, Jr., for the state.

McGowen, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The conviction of burglary herein cannot be upheld by this court. The confession should have been excluded for the reason that it was induced by the hope of reward, held out to the appellant.

Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001
                                                     --------------------------------------------------------
                                                          NUMBER              PERCENT           EQUIVALENT
                                                        OF SHARES           OUTSTANDING           SHARES
                                                     ----------------    ----------------    ----------------
<S>                                                  <C>                 <C>                 <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                     2,300,000              100.00%          2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                  2,508,997              100.00%          2,508,997
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock               15,310,943              100.00%         15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                             11,242,857              100.00%         11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                              4,323,874              100.00%          4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                               6,000,000              100.00%          6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                             (6,588)             100.00%             (6,588)
   March 2000 Debt Swap                                     3,789,715              100.00%          3,789,715
   Canadian Transaction                                       714,286              100.00%            714,286
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                 190,651              100.00%            190,651
   Warrants Exercised                                         134,737              100.00%            134,737
                                                     ----------------                        ----------------
                                                           46,509,472                              46,509,472
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                46,509,472

NET LOSS                                                                                     $    (39,319,298)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                           $          (0.85)
                                                                                             ================
</Table>
#### ARONS *v.*DETROIT, GRAND HAVEN & MILWAUKEE RAILWAY CO.

Railroads — Negligence—Failure to Plank in V-shaped Space in Crosswalk — Statutes.

Railroad company is not guilty of negligence as matter of law, under 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 11121, in not planking in V-shaped space in crosswalk near where rails of side track and main traek are merged; statute being permissive merely.

Appeal from Wayne; Collins (Joseph H.), J., presiding.

Submitted October 20, 1931.

(Docket No. 148, Calendar No. 35,978.)

Decided December 8, 1931.

Case by Richard Arons against Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company for personal injuries received while crossing tracks alleged to be defective. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*242*Lorne R. Randall*and *Leo F. Covey,*for plaintiff.

*Frederic T. Harward*and *William W. MacPherson,*for defendant.

Clark, J.

Plaintiff sued for damages for personal injuries averred to be due to negligence of defendant in failing to maintain properly a crosswalk. Defendant had judgment in a trial without a jury. Plaintiff has appealed.

The question is under 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 11121: "Was defendant guilty of negligence as a matter of law in not planking in a V-shaped space formed in a crosswalk at a place where a rail of a side track approached a rail of a main track and near where the rails were merged?

Defendant has testimony that it was impracticable to plank the V-shaped space, which it filled with stone or cinders, the rest of the crosswalk being plank.

The portion of the cited statute is:

> “Provided, That when any pavement or sidewalk is laid upon or across any such crossing or intersection, plank may be used between the rails and for one foot on either side of such rails.”

This statute by its very terms is permissive, not mandatory.

This answers the contention made.

We find no reversible' error.

Affirmed.

Butzel, C. J., and Wiest, McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, and Fead, JJ., concurred.
#### Robert Mario DiBLASI, Appellant, v. Peggy Ann DiBLASI, Appellee.

No. 74-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 19, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

            Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of International Wire
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

            (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

            (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      /s/ GLENN J. HOLLER
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Name:  Glenn J. Holler
                                      Title: Chief Financial Officer



Dated: May 15, 2007