alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### H. F. ALLISON, Appellant, v. MID-FLA. HAULING, INC., a corporation, and Midwest Mutual Insurance Company, a corporation, Appellees.

No. N-521.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 14, 1972.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Robert Vines, Appellant, v Executive Department of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

[655 NYS2d 456]

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered June 7, 1996 in Sullivan County, which converted petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus into a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and dismissed the petition.

Petitioner challenges a determination of respondent Board of Parole, issued December 14, 1994, which denied his request for release on parole and ordered him held for an additional 24 months, with a subsequent parole hearing scheduled for December 1996. Inasmuch as the 24-month period specified in the determination has expired, this appeal is moot *(see, Matter of Alexander v Rodriguez,*182 AD2d 958). In any event, the Board’s discretionary release decision was in full accord with all statutory and regulatory requirements *(see, Matter of McKee v New York State Bd. of Parole,*157 AD2d 944, 945).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
#### Guenevere JENNINGS, Appellant, v. John A. JENNINGS, Appellee.

No. 74-125.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 21, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,156,517
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,494,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    431,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,492,278
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,492,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,005
<BONDS>                                      4,867,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,457,927)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,492,278
<SALES>                                        177,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  639,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             561,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,023,385)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,023,385)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,023,385)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (5,117)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (5,117)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000947427
<NAME> COMPUTRON SOFTWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          22,510
<SECURITIES>                                     1,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,768
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,150
<PP&E>                                          12,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,097
<OTHER-SE>                                    (52,036)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,380
<SALES>                                          5,629
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,791
<CGS>                                              281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,997)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,997)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,997)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section** **1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section** **906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alexander H. Good, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

|                          |                                  |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| /s/ Alexander H. Good

  |
| Name:                         | Alexander H. Good                     |
| Title:                        | Chief Executive Officer and President |

February 27, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM THE ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
               SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
        
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                          40,744
<SECURITIES>                                                    64,063
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   34,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       696
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               151,809
<PP&E>                                                          15,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   1,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 169,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           39,248
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                                      60,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   169,211
<SALES>                                                         22,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                36,280
<CGS>                                                            7,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    7,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                23,072
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  5,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     2,184
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              3,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     3,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    $0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    $0.14
         

</TABLE>
#### Mahan vs. Owen ad.

The affidavit to a claim against the estate of a deceased person need not be signed by the affiant. *(Gill vs. Ward,*22 *Arle.)*

Where neither the certificate, the caption nor the body of the transcript of a decree shows what court rendered the decree, it is no evidence.

*Appeal from White Circtiit Court.*

Hoñ. William C. Sevens, Circuit Judge.

Jordan, for the appellant.

B. D. Turner, for the appellee.

Mr. Chief Justice English

delivered the opinion of the court.

Mahan presented to the probate court of White county, for allowance against the estate of John Owen, deceased, a tran*348script of what purported to be a decree of some court, in favor of Mahan, against Owen, for a sum of money.

Mary A. Owen, the administratrix of John Owen, contested the claim, it was disallowed, and on appeal by Mahan to the circuit court, the judgment of the probate court was affirmed.

It seems that the probate court rejected the demand, because the affidavit was not subscribed by Mahan,, and the transcript was not properly authenticated.

The first objection was not well taken, as held in *Gill et al. vs. Ward et al.*22 *Ark.*

Passing over the informality of the certificate of authentication, attached to the transcript of the decree, in other respects, neither the certificate, the caption, nor the body of the transcript, shows what court rendered the decree.

For this cause the transcript was properly excluded, and the claim disallowed.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS IF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
(A) Identify specific financial statements.
(B) Identify filing.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (200)
<INVENTORY>                                     48,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,508
<PP&E>                                         100,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                (40,715)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,823
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,380
<SALES>                                        273,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               273,620
<CGS>                                          180,554
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  243,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   530
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,902
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,630<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.76
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,833
<SECURITIES>                                     1,835
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,141
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,275
<PP&E>                                          12,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,120
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,099
<OTHER-SE>                                    (52,917)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,361
<SALES>                                         10,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,597
<CGS>                                              887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roubik Gregorian certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge, the Annual Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.



|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|/s/    ROUBIK GREGORIAN                                                                       
|Roubik Gregorian Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 20, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 20, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0311. MACON-BIBB COUNTY v. CARL HODGE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

19CV70509
#### Frederick Paul LEISCHEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-629.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Andrew MAMON, Jr., et al.

No. 7169.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1967.

Robert W. Smith of Seale, Smith, Baine & Phelps, Baton Rouge, for Robert J. Da-rouse and Mary R. Darouse.

Horace C. Lane, Baton Rouge, for State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Robert J. Vandaworker of Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Phillips, Baton Rouge, for O. K. Radiator Co., Inc., and Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wisconsin.

Before LOTTINGER, SARTAIN, and ELLIS, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the case of Darouse et al. v. Mamón et al., 205 So.2d 127, decided by us this date, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.

Affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0762

_____________________________
T IFFANY L ATASHIA A SH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Martin A. Fitzpatrick , Judge

.
June 13 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
R OWE , K ELSEY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Professional  Veterinary
Products,  Ltd. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  October 31,
2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  each of the  undersigned,  in the  capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that  to his
knowledge:

     1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date: December 10, 2003.


By:    /S/ DR. LIONEL L. REILLY
    -------------------------------------------------
       Dr. Lionel L. Reilly, President, Chief Executive
       Officer and Director


By:    /S/ NEAL B. SODERQUIST
    -------------------------------------------------
       Neal B. Soderquist, Chief Financial Officer
Abatement Order filed July 2, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00332-CR

____________

BENJAMIN EUGENE ALLEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 8

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2000794

ABATEMENT ORDER

The reporter’s record has not been filed in this appeal. The court reporter has 

informed the court that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the 

reporter’s fee to prepare the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(A). 

This court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to proceed without the payment 

of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(B). Accordingly, we enter the following 

order. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).
We ORDER the judge of the County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 to 

immediately conduct a hearing at which appellant, appellant’s counsel, if any, and 

counsel for the State shall participate, either in person or by video teleconference, 

to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether 

appellant is indigent and, thus entitled to a free record and appointed counsel on 

appeal. The judge may appoint appellate counsel for appellant if necessary. The 

judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and 

conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing 

and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The 

transcribed record of the hearing, the court’s findings and conclusions, and a 

videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording of the video 

teleconference shall be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days of the 

date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or 

the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any 

party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to 

schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not 

request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date 

and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM