alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,295
<SECURITIES>                                    10,702
<RECEIVABLES>                                      233
<ALLOWANCES>                                        13
<INVENTORY>                                        298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,120
<PP&E>                                           4,750
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     36,563
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,285)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,241
<SALES>                                            206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,634
<CGS>                                            1,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (746)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DAY
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,182
<PP&E>                                          44,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,149
<BONDS>                                        133,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,319
<SALES>                                        122,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,034
<CGS>                                           75,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,733
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NO. 03-17-00661-CR

THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF APPEALS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS 

AUSTIN RAY CARPENTER §

 APPELLANT §

VS. §

 §

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

 APPELLEE §

APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF 

THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT: 

 COMES NOW, AUSTIN RAY CARPENTER, Appellant, by and 

through his Attorney, Rudy Taylor, and files this Motion for Extension of 

Time to File Brief. In support of this motion, the Appellant shows the Court 

the following: 

I.

Deadline for Filing Appellant’s Brief

 The 119th Judicial District Court Reporter, April Drake, filed the 

record in this case on 11/15/17. Appellant’s Brief is due 12/15/17. 

II.

Length of Extension Sought 

 Appellant requests an extension of 30 days. 

III. 

Need for Extension 

Appellee’s request for an extension is based on the following facts: 

ACCEPTED

03-17-00661-CR

21325954

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

12/15/2017 4:42 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/15/2017 4:42:55 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Due to personal illness, court appearances, several trial preparations,

and two bench trials, Appellant has had insufficient time to prepare 

said brief. 

IV.

Previous Appellant Extensions

There have been no prior Appellant extensions in this appeal.

Wherefore, Premises Considered, Appellant prays the Court grant 

this motion and extend the deadline for a period of thirty (30) days.

Respectfully Submitted,

Rudy Taylor Law

PO Box 1045

Eden, Texas 76837

512-387-2065

866-332-2599 (fax)

rudytaylorlaw@gmail.com

BY:_ /S/ Rudy Taylor 

Rudy Taylor

State Bar No. 24039498

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and 

foregoing Appellee’s First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief was 

emailed to Stacey M. Soule, Attorney for the Appellee, at PO Box 13046, 

Austin, Texas 78711-3046 on this the 15th day of December, 2017.

/S/ Rudy Taylor 

Rudy Taylor
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1247

To terminate the Extremely Low Frequency Communication System of the

Navy.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 15 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself and Mr. KOHL) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To terminate the Extremely Low Frequency Communication

System of the Navy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extremely Low Fre5 quency Communication System Termination and Deficit

6 Reduction Act of 1993’’.
2

•S 1247 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FURTHER FUNDING OF THE EX2 TREMELY LOW FREQUENCY COMMUNICA3 TION SYSTEM.

4 (a) PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Except as

5 provided in subsection (b), funds appropriated on or after

6 the date of the enactment of this Act to or for the use

7 of the Department of Defense may not be obligated or ex8 pended for the Extremely Low Frequency Communication

9 System of the Navy.

10 (b) LIMITED EXCEPTION FOR TERMINATION

11 COSTS.—Subsection (a) does not apply to expenditures

12 solely for termination of the Extremely Low Frequency

13 Communication System.

Æ
#### In the Interest of J. M., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1356.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 2, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Eva Weisner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Lance R. Stelzer,' Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks reversal of a delinquency order, on the ground on insufficiency of the evidence. The basis of the petition on which the order was entered was that the juvenile had engaged in shoplifting, the theft of a pair of shoes or boots from the store of J. C. Penney Co. On consideration of the record we hold the contention of the appellant that the evidence relating thereto was insufficient, is without merit. A security guard of the store who apprehended the appellant testified he observed the entire transaction, the taking of the shoes by the appellant from a counter in the store, the placing thereof in a bag and his departure from the store therewith without payment.

Affirmed.
-  Coronavirus 
-  Grants 
-  Health Insurance Reform 
-  HHS Administrative 
-  HIPAA 
-  Medicare and Medicaid 
-  Programs for Families and Children 
-  Public Health and Safety 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# Category: Coronavirus

**Topics: **Data

### Data

##         3028 - If my employer requires proof of my COVID-19 vaccination status, does that violate my rights under HIPAA?      

In general, the HIPAA Rules do not apply to employers or employment records. HIPAA only applies to HIPAA covered entities – health care providers, health plans, and health care clearinghouses – and, to some extent, to their business associates. If an employer asks an employee to provide proof that they have been vaccinated, that is not a HIPAA violation, and employees may decide whether to provide that information to their employer.

Read the full answer

##         3027 - I am a medical provider and received a call from the US Department of Health and Human Service’s Data Outreach Team . How can I verify that this is a legitimate call?      

In order to provide accurate information for the national COVID-19 response, you may receive a call from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) **Data Outreach Team’s Call Center**. If you are unsure about the identity of the caller, or would like to validate the accuracy of the call, you are free to hang up and call us back at **833-908-1527****. **You may also send an email to **Protect-ServiceDesk@hhs.gov** to receive a confirmation email.

Read the full answer

## Search HHS FAQs by questions or keywords:
House Calendar No. 89

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 259

[Report No. 103–259]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reother purposes. fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for mental appropriations for such programs for the ending September 30, 1994, and making supple- nancing, and related programs for the fiscal year appropriations for foreign operations, export fi- port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2295) making

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 89

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 259

[Report No. 103–259]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2295) making appropriations for foreign operations, export

financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1994, and making supplemental appropriations for such programs

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2295) making appropriations

for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994,

and making supplemental appropriations for such programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2295) making appropriations for
2

HRES 259 RH

1 foreign operations, export financing, and related programs

2 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and mak3 ing supplemental appropriations for such programs for the

4 fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other pur5 poses. All points of order against the conference report

6 and against its consideration are waived. The conference

7 report shall be considered as read.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50827

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

RIGOBERTO LOPEZ-GOMEZ,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-1503-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rigoberto LopezGomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez-Gomez has not filed a response.

He recently has been released from imprisonment and removed from the United

States.

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 26, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-50827 Document: 00511215640 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/26/2010
No. 09-50827

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and

in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th

Cir. 2007).

2

Case: 09-50827 Document: 00511215640 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/26/2010
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 34574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15514]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FR-9040-4]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7156 or https://www2.epa.gov/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements, Filed 07/09/2018 
Through 07/13/2018, Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20180156, Final, USFS, OR, Lobert Restoration Project, Review 
Period Ends: 08/20/2018, Contact: William Conroy 541-783-4039.
EIS No. 20180158, Final, HHS, OH, Final Environmental Impact Statement 
for Site Acquisition and Campus Consolidation for NIOSH, Review Period 
Ends: 08/20/2018, Contact: Harry Marsh 770-488-8170.
EIS No. 20180160, Final, BLM, UT, Alton Coal Tract Lease by 
Application, Review Period Ends: 08/20/2018, Contact: Keith Rigtrup 
435-865-3063.
EIS No. 20180161, Final Supplement, USFS, MT, Rock Creek Mine Project, 
Review Period Ends: 08/23/2018, Contact: Katelyn Miller 406-293-6211.
EIS No. 20180162, Final, USACE, CO, Northern Integrated Supply Project, 
Review Period Ends: 09/04/2018, Contact: John E. Urbanic 303-979-4120.
EIS No. 20180163, Draft, USFWS, CA, Green Diamond Forest Habitat 
Conservation Plan, Comment Period Ends: 09/04/2018, Contact: Dan Cox 
916-414-6539.
EIS No. 20180164, Final, USFS, CA, Exchequer Restoration Project, 
Review Period Ends: 08/20/2018, Contact: Elaine Locke 559-855-5355.

Amended Notice

    Revision to the Federal Register Notice published 06/01/2018, 
extend comment period from 07/16/2018 to 07/31/2018, EIS No. 20180113, 
Draft, DHS, ID, Bog Creek Road Project, Contact: Paul Enriquez, 949-
643-6365.

    Dated: July 17, 2018.
Robert Tomiak,
Director, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2018-15514 Filed 7-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
PAGE 1 OF 1 www.epa.gov/ozone/snap



### INVITATION: FIRE PROTECTION SECTOR

STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP

Hosted By: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Stratospheric Protection Division

Date: December 2, 2015

Time: 1 : 30

– 3 : 00 p

. m. (please plan to arrive by 1 : 00 p .m. to sign in)

Location: EPA, 1 201 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20004, EPA East

Room 4225

Background: EPA hosted a meeting on September 11, 2015, for interested stakeholders to exchange information on the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. During the past 12 months, EPA has taken four separate actions under the SNAP

program, to support the President’s June 2013 C limate Action Plan, which directs EPA to “use its authority through the Significant New Alternatives Policy Program to encourage private sector investment in low

- emissions technology by identifying and approving

climate

- friendly chemicals while prohibiting certain uses of the most harmful chemical

alternative s.” As part of SNAP’s continuing efforts, we are hosting this workshop which will concentrate on the fire protection sector.

Logistics: Please RSVP by November 25 th to Paul

- Harvey Weiner with a direct reply to

this e

- mail ( weiner.paul

- harvey@epa.gov ) or by telephone at (202) 343

- 9740. Please include your name and affiliation. You are welcome to share this invitation with other interested participants; however, please ask them to RSVP by November 25 th as well. We look forward to a productive and informative meeting.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0587

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSE MARTINEZ JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 28, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 23 2022

08/23/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0587
#### CRONBERGER *v.*CRAMPTON.

1. Motor Vehicles — Negligence—Question eor Jury.

In action against automobile driver for personal injuries to boy five years and seven months old, testimony that when boy • started across street defendant was 236 feet from point of collision, and that he did not see boy before striking him, *held,*to present question for jury as to defendant’s negligence.

2., Witnesses — Impeachment—Implied Contradictory Statements Open to Explanation.

■ Where witness testified that she saw boy run out from curb and saw collision, but did not see car before it struck him, statement by her implying that she had seen sufficient of conduct of driver and boy before collision to form judgment as to who Was to blame, *held,*competent in impeachment, but open to explanation, by her.

*239Appeal from Jackson; Williams (Benjamin), J.

Submitted January 28, 1932.

(Docket No. 92, Calendar No. 35,586.)

Decided April 4, 1932.

Case by Lawrence G. Cronberger against George Crampton for damages sustained when defendant injured plaintiff’s son, David Lawrence Cronberger. Directed verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Reversed, and new-trial ordered.

*Richard Price*and *Norman E. Leslie,*for plaintiff.

*Bishee, McKone, Wilson $ King,*for defendant.

Fead, J.

Defendant had directed verdict in an action for negligent injuries to plaintiff’s son, David, who was five years and seven months of age.

As David was crossing a 30-foot street in a .residence district of Jackson, he was struck by defendant’s automobile. The testimony most favorable to plaintiff was that, as David started to run across the street, defendant was 236 feet from the point of collision, and that, immediately after the accident, he said he had not seen David before he struck him. If this testimony be true, defendant, in the exercise of ordinary care, would have seen the boy and avoided the accident if he had been driving at a lawful rate of speed and keeping a proper lookout. His negligence was for the jury.

A witness, Mrs. Emens, testified that she saw the boy run out from the curb and she saw the collision, but did not see the car before it struck Dayid. On cross-examination, a prior statement by her was offered, solely for the purpose of impeachment, in which she said:

> “I wouldn’t say the man was speeding. I don’t remember just where he stopped. I thought the *240boy was to blame, and didn’t notice anything careless about the car driver.”

The statement necessarily implied that the witness had seen sufficient of the conduct of the car driver and the boy before the collision to form a judgment thereon. Her statement was open to her explanation, but was competent in impeachment. *McClellan*v. *Railway Co.,*105 Mich. 101.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Sharpe, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred with Fead, J.

North, J.

I concur on the first ground noted.

Potter, J., concurred with North, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000756680
<NAME>                        HMG Worldwide Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                        5,730
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                15,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                    453
<INVENTORY>                                  15,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             37,649
<PP&E>                                        8,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                2,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               51,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        36,845
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         93
<OTHER-SE>                                    8,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 51,729
<SALES>                                      68,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             68,457
<CGS>                                        49,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                15,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                     31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           1,904
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,904
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .19
        


</TABLE>