This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices to the public of the proposed

issuance of rules and regulations. The

purpose of these notices is to give interested

persons an opportunity to participate in the

rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules.

Proposed Rules Federal Register

34953 

Vol. 83, No. 142 

Tuesday, July 24, 2018 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Part 956 

[Doc. No.: AMS–SC–18–0028; SC–18– 

956–1] 

Sweet Onions Grown in the Walla 

Walla Valley of Southeast Washington 

and Northeast Oregon; Proposed 

Amendments to the Marketing Order 

(No. 956) 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites 

comments on proposed amendments to 

Marketing Order No. 956, which 

regulates the handling of sweet onions 

grown in the Walla Walla Valley of 

Southeast Washington and Northeast 

Oregon. The proposed amendments 

would change the Walla Walla Sweet 

Onion Marketing Committee’s 

(Committee) size, quorum, and voting 

requirements. It would also change the 

staggered term limits so that one-half of 

the producer and handler member terms 

expire every two fiscal periods instead 

of one-third every three fiscal periods. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

September 24, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments 

concerning this proposed rule. 

Comments must be sent to the Docket 

Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement 

Division, Specialty Crops Program, 

AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 

Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, 

DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or 

internet: http://www.regulations.gov. All 

comments should reference the 

document number and the date and 

page number of this issue of the Federal 

Register and will be made available for 

public inspection in the Office of the 

Docket Clerk during regular business 

hours, or can be viewed at: http://

www.regulations.gov. All comments 

submitted in response to this proposed 

rule will be included in the record and 

will be made available to the public. 

Please be advised that the identity of the 

individuals or entities submitting the 

comments will be made public on the 

internet at the address provided above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Geronimo Quinones, Marketing 

Specialist, or Julie Santoboni, 

Rulemaking Branch Chief, Marketing 

Order and Agreement Division, 

Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 

1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 

0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; 

Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202) 

720–8938, or Email: 

Geronimo.Quinones@ams.usda.gov or 

Julie.Santoboni@ams.usda.gov. 

Small businesses may request 

information on complying with this 

regulation by contacting Richard Lower, 

Marketing Order and Agreement 

Division, Specialty Crops Program, 

AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 

Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, 

DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– 

2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email: 

Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, 

proposes an amendment to regulations 

issued to carry out a marketing order as 

defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposal 

is issued under Marketing Order No. 

956, as amended (7 CFR part 956), 

regulating the handling of sweet onions 

grown in the Walla Walla Valley of 

Southeast Washington and Northeast 

Oregon. Part 956 (referred to as the 

‘‘Order’’) is effective under the 

Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act 

of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), 

hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The 

Committee locally administers the 

Order and is comprised of sweet onion 

producers and handlers operating 

within the area of production and a 

public member. 

Section 608c(17) of the Act and the 

applicable rules of practice and 

procedure governing the formulation of 

marketing agreements and orders (7 CFR 

part 900) authorizes amendment of the 

Order through this informal rulemaking 

action. The Agricultural Marketing 

Service (AMS) will consider comments 

received in response to this proposed 

rule, and based on all the information 

available, will determine if the Order 

amendment is warranted. If AMS 

determines amendment of the Order is 

warranted, a subsequent proposed rule 

and notice of referendum would be 

issued and producers would be allowed 

to vote for or against the proposed Order 

amendments. AMS would then issue a 

final rule effectuating any amendments 

approved by producers in the 

referendum. 

The Department of Agriculture 

(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in 

conformance with Executive Orders 

13563 and 13175. This action falls 

within a category of regulatory actions 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive 

Order 12866 review. Additionally, 

because this proposed rule does not 

meet the definition of a significant 

regulatory action it does not trigger the 

requirements contained in Executive 

Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum 

titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing 

Section 2 of the Executive Order of 

January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing 

Regulation and Controlling Regulatory 

Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017). 

This proposal has been reviewed 

under Executive Order 12988, Civil 

Justice Reform. This rule is not intended 

to have retroactive effect. This rule shall 

not be deemed to preclude, preempt, or 

supersede any State program covering 

sweet onions grown in the Walla Walla 

Valley of Southeast Washington and 

Northeast Oregon. 

The Act provides that administrative 

proceedings must be exhausted before 

parties may file suit in court. Under 

section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any 

handler subject to an order may file 

with USDA a petition stating that the 

order, any provision of the order, or any 

obligation imposed in connection with 

the order is not in accordance with law 

and request a modification of the order 

or to be exempted therefrom. A handler 

is afforded the opportunity for a hearing 

on the petition. After the hearing, USDA 

would rule on the petition. The Act 

provides that the district court of the 

United States in any district in which 

the handler is an inhabitant, or has his 

or her principal place of business, has 

jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on 

the petition, provided an action is filed 

no later than 20 days after the date of 

entry of the ruling. 

Section 1504 of the Food, 

Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 

(2008 Farm Bill)(Pub. L. 110–246) 

amended section 8c(17) of the Act, 

which in turn required the addition of 

supplemental rules of practice to 7 CFR 


jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
34954 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21, 

2008). The amendment of section 8c(17) 

of the Act and the supplemental rules of 

practice authorize the use of informal 

rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend 

Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut 

marketing agreements and orders. USDA 

may use informal rulemaking to amend 

marketing orders based on the nature 

and complexity of the proposed 

amendments, the potential regulatory 

and economic impacts on affected 

entities, and any other relevant matters. 

AMS has considered these factors and 

has determined that the amendments 

proposed are not unduly complex and 

the nature of the proposed amendments 

is appropriate for utilizing the informal 

rulemaking process to amend the Order. 

A discussion of the potential regulatory 

and economic impacts on affected 

entities is discussed later in the ‘‘Initial 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis’’ section 

of this proposed rule. 

The proposed amendments were 

unanimously recommended by the 

Committee following deliberations at 

two public meetings held on November 

14, 2017 and March 3, 2018. The 

proposals would amend the Order by 

changing the Committee’s size, quorum, 

and voting requirements. This action 

would also change the staggered term 

limits so that one-half of the producer 

and handler member terms expire every 

two fiscal periods instead of one-third 

every three fiscal periods. 

Proposal 1—Reduce Committee Size 

Section 956.20 provides that the 

Committee consists of ten members, six 

of whom shall be producers, three of 

whom shall be handlers, and one public 

member. This proposal would amend 

§ 956.20 by reducing the size of the 

Committee from ten to seven members, 

four of whom shall be producers, two of 

whom shall be handlers, and one public 

member. The requirement that each 

member have an alternate with the same 

qualifications as the member would 

remain unchanged. 

Since promulgation of the Order in 

1995, the number of Walla Walla sweet 

onion producers and handlers operating 

in the industry has decreased, which 

makes it difficult to find enough 

members and alternates to fill all the 

positions on the Committee. Decreasing 

the Committee’s size from ten members 

to seven members would make it more 

reflective of today’s industry. Having a 

smaller size committee would enable it 

to fulfill membership and quorum 

requirements. These changes should 

help the Committee streamline its 

operations and increase its 

effectiveness. 

Proposal 2—Revise Term of Office and 

Staggered Term Limits 

Section 956.21 requires Committee 

members and their alternates to serve 

for three years in staggered terms with 

one-third of the terms expiring each 

year. 

This proposal would change § 956.21 

by revising the terms of office for the 

producer and handler members from 

three years to two years beginning on 

June 1 so that one-half of the Committee 

changes every year. The staggered terms 

would also change so that one-half of 

the producer and handler member terms 

expire every two fiscal periods instead 

of one-third of the producer and handler 

members forms expiring every three 

fiscal periods. The proposed term limit 

changes would only apply to producer 

and handler members, and the public 

member term would remain three years. 

Proposal 3—Revise Quorum and Voting 

Requirements 

Currently, Section 956.28(a) states 

that six members of the Committee shall 

constitute a quorum, and six concurring 

votes shall be required to pass any 

motion or approve any Committee 

action, except that recommendations 

made pursuant to § 956.61 shall require 

seven concurring votes. 

The proposed changes would modify 

§ 956.28 to state that four rather than six 

members would constitute a quorum 

and four rather than six concurring 

votes would be required to pass any 

motion to approve any Committee 

action, except for recommendations 

made pursuant to § 956.61, which 

would require five rather than seven 

concurring votes. These changes would 

help to streamline the Committee’s 

operations and increase its 

effectiveness. 

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

Pursuant to the requirements set forth 

in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered 

the economic impact of this action on 

small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 

prepared this initial regulatory 

flexibility analysis. 

The purpose of the RFA is to fit 

regulatory actions to the scale of 

businesses subject to such actions in 

order that small businesses will not be 

unduly or disproportionately burdened. 

Marketing orders issued pursuant to the 

Act, and rules issued thereunder, are 

unique in that they are brought about 

through group action of essentially 

small entities acting on their own 

behalf. 

There are eight handlers of Walla 

Walla sweet onions subject to regulation 

under the Order and approximately 15 

producers in the regulated production 

area. Small agricultural service firms are 

defined by the Small Business 

Administration as those having annual 

receipts of less than $7,500,000, and 

small agricultural producers are defined 

as those having annual receipts of less 

than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201). 

The Committee reported that 

approximately 390,000 50-pound bags 

or equivalents of Walla Walla sweet 

onions were shipped into the fresh 

market in 2017. Based on information 

reported by USDA’s Market News 

Service, the average 2017 marketing 

year f.o.b. shipping point price for the 

Walla Walla sweet onions was $14.90 

per 50-pound equivalent. Multiplying 

the $14.90 average price by the 

shipment quantity of 390,000 50-pound 

equivalents yields an annual crop 

revenue estimate of $5,811,000. The 

average annual revenue for each of the 

eight handlers is therefore calculated to 

be $726,375 ($5,811,000 divided by 

eight), which is considerably less than 

the Small Business Administration 

threshold of $7,500,000. Consequently, 

all the Walla Walla sweet onion 

handlers could be classified as small 

entities. 

In addition, based on information 

provided by the National Agricultural 

Statistics Service (NASS), the average 

producer price for Walla Walla sweet 

onions for the 2012 through 2016 

marketing years is $15.27 per 50-pound 

equivalent. NASS has not released data 

regarding the 2017 marketing year at 

this time. Multiplying the 2012–2016 

marketing year average price of $15.27 

by the 2017 marketing year shipments of 

390,000, 50-pound equivalents yields an 

annual crop revenue estimate of 

$5,955,300. The estimated average 

annual revenue for each of the 15 

producers is therefore calculated to be 

approximately $397,020 ($5,955,300 

divided by 15), which is less than the 

Small Business Administration 

threshold of $750,000. In view of the 

foregoing, the majority of Walla Walla 

sweet onion producers, and all of the 

Walla Walla sweet onion handlers, may 

be classified as small entities. 

The proposed amendments would 

change the Committee’s size, quorum, 

and voting requirements. They would 

also change the staggered term limits so 

that one-half of the producer and 

handler member terms expire every two 

fiscal periods instead of one-third every 

three fiscal periods. 

The Committee’s proposed 

amendments were unanimously 

recommended at two public meetings 

on November 14, 2017 and March 3, 

2018. If these proposals are approved in 


jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules 34955 

a referendum, there would be no direct 

financial effects on producers or 

handlers. The number of producers and 

handlers operating in the industry has 

decreased, which makes it difficult to 

find enough members to fill positions 

on the Committee. Decreasing the 

Committee’s size would make it more 

reflective of today’s industry. 

The Committee believes these changes 

will serve the needs of the Committee 

and the industry. No economic impact 

is expected if the proposed amendments 

are approved because they would not 

establish any new regulatory 

requirements on handlers, nor would 

they have any assessment or funding 

implications. There would be no change 

in financial costs, reporting, or 

recordkeeping requirements if this 

proposal is approved. 

Alternatives to this proposal, 

including making no changes at this 

time, were considered by the 

Committee. Due to changes in the 

industry, AMS believes the proposals 

are justified and necessary to ensure the 

Committee’s ability to locally 

administer the program. Reducing the 

size of the Committee would enable it 

to fulfill membership and quorum 

requirements fully, thereby ensuring a 

more efficient and orderly flow of 

business. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35), the Order’s information 

collection requirements have been 

previously approved by OMB and 

assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 

(Vegetable and Specialty Crops). No 

changes in those requirements are 

necessary because of this action. Should 

any changes become necessary, they 

would be submitted to OMB for 

approval. 

This proposed rule would impose no 

additional reporting or recordkeeping 

requirements on either small or large 

Walla Walla Valley sweet onion 

handlers. As with all Federal marketing 

order programs, reports and forms are 

periodically reviewed to reduce 

information requirements and 

duplication by industry and publicsector agencies. 

AMS is committed to complying with 

the E-Government Act, to promote the 

use of the internet and other 

information technologies to provide 

increased opportunities for citizen 

access to Government information and 

services, and for other purposes. 

USDA has not identified any relevant 

Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or 

conflict with this action. 

The Committee’s meetings were 

widely publicized throughout the Walla 

Walla Valley sweet onion production 

area. All interested persons were invited 

to attend the meetings and encouraged 

to participate in Committee 

deliberations on all issues. Like all 

Committee meetings, the November 14, 

2017 and March 3, 2018, meetings were 

public, and all entities, both large and 

small, were encouraged to express their 

views on the proposals. 

Finally, interested persons are invited 

to submit comments on the proposed 

amendments to the Order, including 

comments on the regulatory and 

information collection impacts of this 

action on small businesses. 

Following analysis of any comments 

received on the amendments proposed 

in this proposed rule, AMS will 

evaluate all available information and 

determine whether to proceed. If 

appropriate, a proposed rule and notice 

of referendum would be issued, and 

producers would be provided the 

opportunity to vote for or against the 

proposed amendments. Information 

about the referendum, including dates 

and voter eligibility requirements, 

would be published in a future issue of 

the Federal Register. A final rule would 

then be issued to effectuate any 

amendment favored by producers 

participating in the referendum. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ 

rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. 

Any questions about the compliance 

guide should be sent to Richard Lower 

at the previously mentioned address in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section. 

General Findings 

The findings hereinafter set forth are 

supplementary to the findings and 

determinations which were previously 

made in connection with the issuance of 

Marketing Order 956; and all said 

previous findings and determinations 

are hereby ratified and affirmed, except 

insofar as such findings and 

determinations may be in conflict with 

the findings and determinations set 

forth herein. 

1. Marketing Order 956 as hereby 

proposed to be amended and all the 

terms and conditions thereof, would 

tend to effectuate the declared policy of 

the Act; 

2. Marketing Order 956 as hereby 

proposed to be amended regulates the 

handling of sweet onions grown in the 

Walla Walla Valley of Southeast 

Washington and Northeast Oregon and 

is applicable only to persons in the 

respective classes of commercial and 

industrial activity specified in the 

Order; 

3. Marketing Order 956 as hereby 

proposed to be amended is limited in 

application to the smallest regional 

production area which is practicable, 

consistent with carrying out the 

declared policy of the Act, and the 

issuance of several marketing orders 

applicable to subdivisions of the 

production area would not effectively 

carry out the declared policy of the Act; 

4. Marketing Order 956 as hereby 

proposed to be amended prescribes, 

insofar as practicable, such different 

terms applicable to different parts of the 

production area as are necessary to give 

due recognition to the differences in the 

production and marketing of onions 

produced or packed in the production 

area; and 

5. All handling of onions produced or 

packed in the production area as 

defined in Marketing Order 956 is in the 

current of interstate or foreign 

commerce or directly burdens, 

obstructs, or affects such commerce. 

A 60-day comment period is provided 

to allow interested persons to respond 

to these proposals. Any comments 

received on the amendments proposed 

in this proposed rule will be analyzed, 

and if AMS determines to proceed based 

on all the information presented, a 

producer referendum would be 

conducted to determine producer 

support for the proposed amendments. 

If appropriate, a final rule would then 

be issued to effectuate the amendments 

favored by producers participating in 

the referendum. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 956 

Onions, Marketing agreements, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 7 CFR part 956 is proposed to 

be amended as follows: 

PART 956—SWEET ONIONS GROWN 

IN THE WALLA WALLA VALLEY OF 

SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON AND 

NORTHEAST OREGON 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 956 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

■ 2. Revise § 956.20 to read as follows: 

§ 956.20 Establishment and membership. 

(a) The Walla Walla Sweet Onion 

Marketing Committee, consisting of 

seven members, is hereby established. 

The Committee shall consist of four 

producer members, two handler 

members, and one public member. Each 


jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
34956 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

member shall have an alternate who 

shall have the same qualifications as the 

member. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. Revise § 956.21 to read as follows: 

§ 956.21 Term of office. 

(a) Except as otherwise provided in 

paragraph (b) of this section, the term of 

office of grower and handler Committee 

members and their respective alternates 

shall be two years beginning on June 1. 

The terms shall be determined so that 

one-half of the grower membership and 

one-half of the handler membership 

shall terminate every year. Members and 

alternates shall serve during the term of 

office for which they are selected and 

have been qualified, or during that 

portion thereof beginning on the date on 

which they qualify during such term of 

office and continuing until the end 

thereof, or until their successors are 

selected and have qualified. 

(b) The term of office of the initial 

members and alternates shall begin as 

soon as possible after the effective date 

of this subpart. One-half of the initial 

industry grower and handler members 

and alternates shall serve for a one year 

term and one-half shall serve for a two 

year term. The initial, as well as all 

successive terms of office of the public 

member and alternate member shall be 

for three years. 

(c) The consecutive terms of office for 

all members shall be limited to two twoyear terms. There shall be no such 

limitation for alternate members. 

■ 4. Revise § 956.28 to read as follows: 

§ 956.28 Procedure 

(a) Four members of the Committee 

shall constitute a quorum, and four 

concurring votes shall be required to 

pass any motion or approve any 

Committee action, except that 

recommendations made pursuant to 

§ 956.61 shall require five concurring 

votes. 

* * * * * 

Dated: July 19, 2018. 

Bruce Summers, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15792 Filed 7–23–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0878; Airspace 

Docket No. 14–AWP–10] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Amendment of Class D and 

Class E Airspace, and Establishment 

of Class E Airspace; Honolulu, HI 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

modify Class D airspace, and Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface, and establish 

Class E surface area airspace at Wheeler 

Army Airfield (AAF), Honolulu, HI. 

This action also would update the 

airport name and geographic 

coordinates in the associated Class D 

and E airspace areas to match the FAA’s 

aeronautical database, and would 

replace outdated language in the 

airspace description. An editorial 

change to the airspace designations also 

would be made. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 7, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590; telephone: 1– 

800–647–5527, or (202) 366–9826. You 

must identify FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2014–0878; Airspace Docket No. 14– 

AWP–10, at the beginning of your 

comments. You may also submit 

comments through the internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, and 

subsequent amendments can be viewed 

online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/ 

publications/. For further information, 

you can contact the Airspace Policy 

Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is 

also available for inspection at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of FAA 

Order 7400.11B at NARA, call (202) 

741–6030, or go to https://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ 

ibr-locations.html. 

FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steve Haga, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center, 2200 S 

216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198–6547; 

telephone (206) 231–2252. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority, as it would 

amend Class D and Class E airspace at 

Wheeler Army Airfield (AAF), 

Honolulu, HI, to support standard 

instrument approach procedures for IFR 

operations at the airport. 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Persons wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA– 

2014–0878; Airspace Docket No. 14– 

AWP–10’’. The postcard will be date/ 

time stamped and returned to the 

commenter. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this notice may be changed 

in light of the comments received. A 

report summarizing each substantive 


jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS