alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Unitil Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned Robert G. Schoenberger, Chief Executive Officer and President, Mark H. Collin, Chief Financial Officer and Laurence M. Brock, Chief Accounting Officer,
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 |  |                                       |  |                   
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|Signature                                        |  | Capacity                              |  | Date              
|                                                 |  |                                      
|/s/ Robert G. SchoenbergerRobert G. Schoenberger |  | Chief Executive Officer and President |  | February 21, 2007 
|                                                 |  |                                      
|/s/ Mark H. CollinMark H. Collin                 |  | Chief Financial Officer               |  | February 21 , 2007
|                                                 |  |                                      
|/s/ Laurence M. BrockLaurence M. Brock           |  | Chief Accounting Officer              |  | February 21, 2007
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0220-13

EX PARTE RAHUL SUDHAKAR, Appellee

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

FORT BEND COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to a plea agreement, the Appellee pled guilty in 2009 to possession of a

controlled substance. In 2011, he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus claiming

that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to advise him of the deportation

consequences of his guilty plea. The trial court granted relief and the Court of Appeals

affirmed. Ex parte Sudhakar, No. 14-11-00701-CR (Tex. App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 2012).

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review contending the Court of Appeals erred
in holding that Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), applies retroactively to the collateral

review of a state conviction that was final when the Padilla opinion was issued. The State

pointed out that the U.S. Supreme Court recently held that, under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S.

288 (1989), Padilla does not have retroactive effect. Chaidez v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 1103

(2013). We adopted that Court’s reasoning as a matter of state law in Ex parte De Los Reyes,

No. PD-1457-11, __ S.W.3d __ (Tex. Crim. App. March 20, 2013).

The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in Ex

parte De Los Reyes. Therefore, we grant the State’s petition for discretionary review, vacate

the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals in light

of Ex parte De Los Reyes.

Delivered April 17, 2013

Do Not Publish
-  Civil Rights for Individuals and Advocates      -  Race, Color, National Origin 
  -  Disability        -  Section 504 
  -  Age Discrimination 
  -  Sex Discrimination & Harassment 
  -  Title IX 
  -  Section 1557        -  Civil Rights FAQs 
    -  Fact Sheets 
  -  Hill-Burton 
  -  Section 1553 
  -  Special Topics        -  Reproductive Health Care 
    -  Civil Rights and Opioids 
    -  Child Welfare 
    -  Community Living and Olmstead 
    -  Effective Communication in Hospitals 
    -  Emergency Preparedness and Response 
    -  Health Disparities 
    -  HIV/AIDS 
    -  Limited English Proficiency (LEP) 
    -  National Origin Discrimination 
    -  Shared Ancestry or Ethnic Characteristics Discrimination 
    -  Environmental Justice 
    -  Sex-Based Harassment 
    -  Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 
  -  HHS Nondiscrimination Notice 

                            -  English 
                            -  العربية‏ (Arabic) 
                            -  中文(简体) (Chinese, Simplified) 
                            -  中文(繁體) (Chinese, Traditional) 
                            -  Français (French) 
                            -  한국어 (Korean) 
                            -  Español (Spanish) 
                            -  Wikang Tagalog (Tagalog) 
                            -  Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese) 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# HHS Language Access Plan 2023

Read the Updated Language Access Plan

Content last reviewed April 11, 2024
TERRY DWIGHT JOHNSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4720

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed March 1, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. W. Joel Boles , Judge

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, and Justin Karpf, Certified Legal Intern, Ta llahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jason W. Rodriguez and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS

, OSTERHAUS

, and BILBREY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

SUFFOLK BANCORP (REGISTRANT)

Subsidiaries of the Registrant:



|                                |  |                             
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name                            |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|                                | 
|SUFFOLK COUNTY NATIONAL BANK    |  | United States               
|(wholly owned subsidiary)       |  |                             
|                                | 
|SUFFOLK GREENWAY, INC.          |  | New York                    
|Real Estate Investment Trust    |  |                             
|Majority Interest (non-voting   |  |                             
|preferred minority interest)    |  |                             
|                                | 
|SCNB FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.   |  | New York                    
|Investment and Insurance Agency |  |                             
|(wholly owned subsidiary)       |  |
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-143243) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-138839, No. 333-96967, No. 333-55082, No. 333-48226, No. 333-31120, No. 333-69381,
No. 333-37371, No. 333-37369 and No. 33-58991) of Exar Corporation of our report dated June 12, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP       
|                                 
|San Jose, California             
|June 12, 2007
Exhibit 23

             Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

 We have issued our report dated October 1, 2004, accompanying the
 consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of VPGI
 Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004.  We hereby consent to
 the incorporation by reference of said report in the following Registration
 Statements of VPGI Corp.:

 Form S-3 (File No. 333-97809 effective August 13, 2002);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-68326 effective August 13, 2002);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-62680 effective July 13, 2001);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-47692 effective October 25, 2000);
 Form S-8 (File No. 333-39358 effective June 15, 2000);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-31952 effective March 21, 2000);
 Form S-2 (File No. 333-06447 effective September 30, 1996).


 /s/  CF & Co., L.L.P.


 CF & Co., L.L.P.

 Dallas, Texas
 October 1, 2004
#### In re ESTATE of Otis O. SWEET, Deceased. William D. SWEET et al., Appellants, v. Charles H. SWEET, as Ancillary Administrator, Appellee.

No. 72-410.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 4, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended October 31, 2007, each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. and will be retained by Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

| /s/ Dr. Lionel L. Reilly | December 12, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dr. Lionel L. Reilly     |  
President/Chief Executive Officer

 
 

/s/ Neal B. Soderquist

December 12, 2007

Neal B. Soderquist

 
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President

 
 

 

  |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 738 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 738

Recognizing the self determination of Gibraltar to determine its status 
                    as a British Overseas Territory.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

    Mr. Holding (for himself, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Petri, Mr. 
  McIntyre, Mr. Murphy of Florida, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Grayson, and Ms. 
   Wilson of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the self determination of Gibraltar to determine its status 
                    as a British Overseas Territory.

Whereas the Department of State recognizes Gibraltar as an overseas territory of 
        the United Kingdom based on the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht;
Whereas the citizens of Gibraltar have freely and democratically expressed their 
        view to remain a British Overseas Territory in 1967 and 2002 when 99.6 
        and 98.48 percent of the Gibraltarians, respectively, voted in a popular 
        referenda their wish to remain a British Overseas Territory;
Whereas the United States has relied on Gibraltar's military facilities numerous 
        times, including America's first overseas military intervention in 1801 
        against the Barbary States, World War II, and the North Atlantic Treaty 
        Organization intervention in 2011 in Libya;
Whereas, during World War II, General Dwight Eisenhower used Gibraltar as his 
        headquarters to plan the liberation of North Africa stating, ``Without 
        it the vital air cover would not have been quickly established on the 
        North African fields.'';
Whereas the security situation in North Africa and the Middle East continues to 
        underscore the need for the United States to maintain secure access to 
        Gibraltar's military facilities;
Whereas Gibraltar has the right, under the United Nations Charter and the 
        International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to determine its 
        own future; and
Whereas the United Kingdom is a loyal ally that has stood by the United States: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the United States honors the contribution that 
        Gibraltar has made to advancing United States security 
        interests in the Mediterranean region since 1801 and extends 
        its deepest appreciation and thanks to the Government of 
        Gibraltar and its citizens; and
            (2) the views and rights of Gibraltarians should always be 
        imperative in any discussion of Gibraltar's status as a British 
        Overseas Territory.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ramon Perez SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-65.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 12, 1969.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Robert E. Metzker, and Arthur L. Rothen-berg, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See McBride v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 70.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy McCabe, Appellant.

[655 NYS2d 60]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered February 27, 1995, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant claims that the court improperly charged the jury on the defense of justification only under the theory of "deadly physical force”, when it should also have charged under the theory of "physical force”. Since the defendant did not object to the language used by the court in its charge, he failed to preserve this issue for appellate review *(see,*CPL *381470.05 [2]; *People v Buckley,*75 NY2d 843, 846; *People v Gurganious,*214 AD2d 681; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245, 249). In any event, the claim is without merit. The defendant here repeatedly struck the complainant on the head, ribs, and arms with a tire iron, fracturing his skull, among other injuries. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant, as is required when determining whether the charge to the jury was adequate *(see, People v Padgett,*60 NY2d 142, 144-145; *People v Watts,*57 NY2d 299, 301), the defendant’s actions can only be considered to constitute deadly physical force *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [11]; *see also, People v Magliato,*68 NY2d 24, 29; *People v Samuels,*198 AD2d 384). Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the court’s charge was proper.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.
#### Andrew L. KENNEDY and Joseph C. Bolardi, for the use and benefit of Andrew L. Kennedy, Appellants, v. David M. WOOLIN and Annie Woolin, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 67-418.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 30, 1968.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### John Earl HALL v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50399.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 29, 1978.

Henry E. Pope, Columbia, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Marvin L. White, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; R. I. Prichard, III, Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation;
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
    Dated: May 15, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Gerald Y. NgGerald Y. NgChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial andAccounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1004 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 77
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1004

                 To permit voluntary economic activity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2013

 Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                              May 22, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 To permit voluntary economic activity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anti-Trust Freedom Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY ECONOMIC COORDINATION BY INDIVIDUALS.

    The Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 
12 et seq.), and section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 
U.S.C. 45) shall not be construed to prohibit, ban, or otherwise extend 
to any voluntary economic coordination, cooperation, agreement, or 
other association, compact, contract, or covenant entered into by or 
between any individual or group of individuals.
                                                        Calendar No. 77

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1004

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                 To permit voluntary economic activity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 22, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FIRST
QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                               22,101,813
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                3,340,243
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                     17,259,522
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>         209,469,829
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>               56,165,061
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                 56,229,419
<LOANS>                             697,826,027
<ALLOWANCE>                           2,069,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,047,676,999
<DEPOSITS>                          716,029,348
<SHORT-TERM>                         38,595,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                   9,940,224
<LONG-TERM>                         137,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 99,168
<OTHER-SE>                          146,013,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>    1,047,676,999
<INTEREST-LOAN>                      13,839,389
<INTEREST-INVEST>                     3,990,475
<INTEREST-OTHER>                        447,709
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                     18,277,573
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                    7,418,560
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    9,787,616
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                 8,489,957
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           123,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                       15,937
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                       4,962,821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       4,191,300
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>            4,191,300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,453,815
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             3.41
<LOANS-NON>                           2,312,939
<LOANS-PAST>                                  0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                      1,949,677
<CHARGE-OFFS>                             3,000
<RECOVERIES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                     2,069,677
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>               2,069,677
        


</TABLE>