U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Washington, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL STAFETY AND

 POLLUTION PREVENTION

Date: April 29, 2010 

PC Code: 006329

DP Barcode: D368426 and 368579

MEMORANDUM

Subject: Acequinocyl and its Degradate, Acequinocyl-OH (R1), Drinking Water 

Assessment in Support of IR-4 New Uses Registration for Fruiting Vegetables 

(Crop Group 8), Okra, Edible Podded Beans, and Hops.

To: Sarah Levy, RAB 1

Dana Vogel, Branch Chief, RAB1

Health Effects Division (7509P)

Venus Eagle, RM 01

Autumn Metzger, PM

Insecticide Branch

Registration Division (7505P)

From: Iwona L. Maher, Chemist, ERBI

Stephen Wente, Ph.D., Chemist, ERBI

Brian Anderson, RAPL, ERBI

Anita Pease, Acting Branch Chief, ERBI

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

This memorandum summarizes the drinking water assessment for the IR-4 New Use registration 

of Kanemite 15 SC acequinocyl, miticide, for fruiting vegetables (crop group 8), okra, edible 

podded beans, and hops. Acequinocyl is currently registered for almonds, tree nuts, pistachios, 

pome fruits, citrus, grapes, strawberries, and ornamentals. The application rates for the proposed 

uses are the same as the application rates for the currently registered agricultural uses; i.e. 0.3 lbs

ai/acre for the maximum single application rate, with two applications allowed at a minimum 

interval of 21 days (0.6 lb ai/acre for a seasonal application rate). This assessment supersedes the 

previous drinking water assessment.
2

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A Tier II screening-level drinking water assessment was conducted for the proposed Section 3 

New Use of acequinocyl (2-(acetyloxy)-3-dodecyl-1,4-naphthalenedione; CAS# 57960-19-7; PC 

Code 006329) on fruiting vegetables (except cucurbits, field grown and greenhouse grown), 

okra, edible podded beans, and hops. The assessment is based on the maximum proposed 

application rate of 0.3 lbs. a.i./acre/application for apple and tomato, applied by ground foliar 

spray two times every 21 days (Kanemite 15 SC; 15.8% a.i.; submitted July 30, 2009). In 

addition to the proposed new use on fruiting vegetables (except cucurbits field grown and 

greenhouse grown), okra, edible podded beans, and hops, this assessment re-evaluates the 

existing use on apples and pecans because the previous drinking water assessment (done in 2007)

employed an older version of Perl shell interface program and older modeling input parameter 

guidance.

Similar to the previous drinking water assessment, two approaches were used in performing the 

drinking water assessment for the proposed acequinocyl uses. In Approach #1, acequinocyl was 

conservatively assumed to be stable to all routes of degradation to account for the uncertainties 

associated with the environmental fate data. In Approach #2, total (acequinocyl + acequinocylOH) residues were modeled with the assumption that the metabolite acequinocyl-OH (referred to 

as the R1 degradate in this assessment) is of toxicological concern. According to the HED 

Metabolism Assessment Review Committee (MARC) the residues of concern in the dietary 

exposure and risk assessment are acequinocyl and acequinocyl-OH (US EPA, 2007; DPs: 

330281and 337378). 

Surface water estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) were generated for acequinocyl 

using the Pesticide Root Zone Model/Exposure Analysis Modeling System (PRZM/EXAMS) 

model. The highest PRZM-EXAMS surface water modeling estimates were obtained for the 

Pennsylvania apple scenario for the acute value, and Pennsylvania tomato scenario for the 

chronic values. The recommended EDWCs for the human health risk assessment, based on 

apples, pecans, and tomato uses, are provided in Table 1. The EDWCs derived via Approach #1 

represent upper bound values while those derived via Approach #2 represent the lower bound 

values. 

Table 1. PCA Corrected Tier II Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations (EDWCs) Resulting from Ground 

Applications of Acequinocyl.

Drinking water source 

(model)

Use

(modeled rate)

1-in-10 year acute

(μg/L)

1-in-10 year 

chronic (μg/L)

30- year average 

(μg/L)

Approach #1: Total Toxic Residues (no acequinocyl degradation)

Surface water 

(PRZM/EXAMS)

PA Apples (0.6 lb ai/A) 12.22 1.79 1.41

PA Tomato (0.6 lb ai/A) 12.08 2.45 2.02

Approach #2: Total Toxic Residues (combined acequinocyl and R1)

Surface water 

(PRZM/EXAMS)

GA Pecans (0.6 lb ai/A) 5.14 0.17 0.11

PA Tomato (0.6 lb ai/A) 3.99 0.29 0.20

Approaches #1 and #2: Total Toxic Residues (combined acequinocyl and R1)

Groundwater 

(SCIGROW)

All Agricultural Uses

(0.6 lb ai/acre)

3.6 x 10-3≤3.6 x 10-3≤3.6 x 10-3
3

Acequinocyl and its major degradate, hydroxy-acequinocyl, were not monitored in surface and 

groundwater under the USGS’s National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program. 

Although the fate and transport database is complete, most of the environmental fate studies 

submitted prior to the initial registration were classified ‘supplemental’ due to numerous 

deficiencies identified in the fate studies such as poor chromatographic separation of acequinocyl 

and R1, use of chloroform:methanol solvent system, lack of LOD and LOQ data, un-eluted 

radioactive residues in the solid phase extraction process, and lack of storage stability data. 

These issues need to be addressed by the registrant to upgrade the fate studies.

2. PROBLEM FORMULATION

2.1. Background

The most recent regulatory actions for acequinocyl include the following:

• Section 3 Request for Uses of Acequinocyl (P.C. Code: 006329) on Greenhouse, Shade 

house, Ornamental, Floral, Foliage and Nursery Crops. August 7, 2003 (US EPA 2003, 

D291707)

• Section 3 Request for Uses of Acequinocyl (P.C. Code: 006329) on Pome Fruits, Citrus, 

Almonds, Pistachios, Strawberries and Outdoor Ornamentals. February 3, 2004. (US EPA 2004, 

DP Barcodes: D285811, D286428, D289153, D290010, D287269, D290009, D291174)

• Ecological Risk Assessment for Use of Acequinocyl (PC 006329) on Grapes, Pome 

Fruits, Citrus, Nuts, and Outdoor Non-Food Uses. August 17, 2007. (US EPA 2007, DP 

337381, 330467, 330471)

• Tier II Drinking Water Assessment for Acequinocyl. June 27, 2007 (US EPA 2007, 

DP337221)

The previous PRZM-EXAMS EDWC estimates were based on the Pennsylvania apple crop 

scenario. The 1-in-10-year annual peak (acute) concentration of parent acequinocyl was 13.4 

μg/L, the 1-in-10-year annual daily mean (chronic-non cancer) concentration was 2.73 μg/L, and 

the 30-year annual mean was 2.3 μg/L based on the Approach #1. Based on Approach #2, the 

acute, chronic-non cancer, and 30-year annual mean concentrations were 10.81 μg/L, 0.37 μg/L, 

and 0.2 μg/L, respectively, for acequinocyl and its R1 degradate. The ground water EDWC for 

acequinocyl and acequinocyl-OH in shallow ground water sources was 0.0036 μg/L for 

acequinocyl applied twice every 21 days regardless of the type of model approach used. These

EDWCs from shallow ground water sources are expected remain the same for the proposed uses 

as acequinocyl proposed use rates are the same as the currently registered food use rates. In the 

previous assessment, EFED recommended use of acequinocyl EDWCs derived using Approach 

#1, in the event that HED finds R1 is not of toxicological concern.
4

2.2. Mode of Action

Acequinocyl is a miticide. Its mode of action is mediated by both the parent chemical and its 

primary degradate, 2-dodecyl-3-hydroxy-1,4-napthoquinone (also referred to as R1, deacetylated 

acequinocyl, acequinocyl-OH, OH-AKD 2023, or AKM-05) through the inhibition of electron 

transfer in mitochondria.

2.3. Use Characteristics

KANEMITE 15 SC is a miticide for the control of Citrus red mite (Panonychus citri), European

red mite (Panonychus ulmi), Pacific spider mite (Tetranychus pacificus), Texas citrus mite

(Eutetranychus banskl) and Spruce spider mite (Oligonychus ununquis), Strawberry spider mite

(Tetranychus turkestam), Willamette spider mite (Eotetranychus willamettel), Two spotted 

spider mite (Tetranychus urticae and Tetranychus cinnabarinus), and Broad mite 

(Polyphagotarsonamus latus). According to the registrant, when applied to the foliage,

KANEMITE 15 SC provides quick knockdown and long residual control. Due to its unique 

mode of action, KANEMITE 15 SC is not expected to have cross-resistance to existing miticides 

and is reportedly very effective against various species of resistant and susceptible mites. 

Acequinocyl initial food use registration was for pome fruits, citrus, almonds, pistachios, 

strawberries, and outdoor ornamentals (US EPA, 2004). Currently, the registrant proposed new 

uses for acequinocyl include fruiting vegetables (except field grown and greenhouse grown 

cucurbits) (eggplant, groundcherry (Physalis spp.), pepino, pepper (includes bell pepper, chili 

pepper, cooking pepper, pimento, sweet pepper, tomatillo, and tomato), okra, edible podded 

beans, and hops. The maximum application rates for the proposed uses are not to exceed 0.3 lb 

ai/acre for a single application rate, and 0.6 lb ai/acre for a seasonal application rate, with a 

minimum reapplication interval of 21 days. The maximum proposed application rates are same 

as the application rates for currently registered acequinocyl agricultural uses. Table 2

summarizes the application rates and application methods for acequinocyl proposed and 

currently registered uses.

Product Information

Product Name: KANEMITETM 15 SC Miticide Ingredients

Active Ingredient: Acequinocyl 

(3-dodecyl-1, 4-dihydro-1, 4-dioxo-2-naphthyl-acetate)..........................................15.8%

Inert Ingredients........................................................................................84.2%

Total....................................................................................................100.00

Contains 1.25 lb ai/gal.
5

Table 2. Acequinocyl proposed use pattern for fruiting vegetables, okra, beans, hops, 

and registered uses1. 

Crop

Maximum 

Individual

Application 

Rate

lbs a.i./A

Number of

Applications

Minimum

Application 

Interval (days)

Maximum 

Annual 

Application 

Rate in

lbs a.i./A/year

Application 

Method

Fruiting vegetables, 

okra, edible podded 

beans, and hop

0.3 2 21 0.6 Ground 

spray

Citrus, tree nuts, 

grapes, pome fruits, 

and strawberries1

0.3 2 21 0.6 Ground 

spray

Outdoor ornamentals1

0.125 2

2

14 0.25 Ground 

spray

1

- Represent the registered food and non-food outdoor uses per label submitted July 30, 2009

2

- Calculated by dividing the max annual application rate by the max individual application rate.

The product label use restrictions specify that the product is not to be applied via irrigation, via 

aerial application, or within 75 feet of aquatic areas. In addition, it is not intended for indoor 

residential use.

Currently, the label includes the following surface water statement:

“This product may contaminate water through drift of spray in wind. This product has a potential

for runoff for several days after application. Poorly draining soils and soils with shallow water

tables are more prone to produce runoff that contains this product. A level, well maintained

vegetative buffer strip between areas to which this product is applied and surface water features

such as ponds, streams, and springs will reduce the potential for contamination of water from

rainfall-runoff. Runoff of this product will be reduced by avoiding applications when rainfall is

forecasted to occur within 48 hours. Sound erosion control practices will reduce this product's

contribution to surface water contamination.”

2.4. Conceptual Model

A. Risk Hypothesis

For acequinocyl, the following risk hypothesis is being employed for this national-scale drinking 

water assessment:

Acequinocyl, when used in accordance with proposed labels, can result in off-site 

movement of the compound product via runoff and spray drift, leading to human 

exposure to acequinocyl and its degradate acequinocyl-OH (R1) through consumption of 

contaminated drinking water. 

B. Conceptual Model

Submitted fate and transport data indicate that acequinocyl is highly reactive, with breakdown 

potentially occurring quickly via both photolysis and hydrolysis. Acequinocyl can reach surface 
6

water via spray drift and less likely via runoff. Once acequinocyl has entered surface water, it is 

not likely to persist as it will hydrolyze to form hydroxy-acequinocyl (also known as OH-AKD

023, 2-hydroxy-3-dodecyl-1,4-napthelenedione (HDNQ), and R-1). 

The source of the stressor considered herein is acequinocyl (PC Code 006329). The source and 

mechanism of release for the proposed new uses of acequinocyl are foliar ground application. 

The mechanisms of acequinocyl transport are spray drift (parent) and potentially surface water 

runoff (degradate). Leaching into groundwater is not expected to be a major contributor, based 

on submitted laboratory studies, indicating that acequinocyl has very low mobility potential. 

Surface water runoff from the areas of application is assumed to follow topography. Spray drift 

will follow the wind directions. 

Potential emission of volatile compounds is not considered as a viable release mechanism for 

acequinocyl, since volatilization is not expected to be a significant route of dissipation for this 

chemical because of the low vapor pressure of the compound. These transport mechanisms (e.g. 

sources) are depicted in the conceptual model below (Figure 1) and result in the potential 

movement of acequinocyl and hydroxy-acequinocyl into surface water, and less likely into

ground water. In surface water, acequinocyl appears to be short lived to form hydroxyacequinocyl. Volatilization, crop uptake, and tile drainage are potential mechanisms of transport 

that are depicted in the model, but not considered in this assessment due to their low significance 

for acequinocyl transport.

Figure 1. Conceptual model for acequinocyl mechanism 

of release and transport into drinking water sources. 
7

2.5. Analysis Plan

Two approaches were used in this drinking water assessment for the proposed acequinocyl uses

to account for the deficiencies identified in the registrant-submitted fate studies. In Approach #1, 

acequinocyl was conservatively assumed to be stable to all routes of degradation to account for

the uncertainties associated with the environmental fate data. In Approach #2, total (acequinocyl 

+ acequinocyl-OH) residues were modeled assuming that the R1 metabolite is of toxicological 

concern. In both approaches, surface water EDWCs were generated for acequinocyl using the 

PRZM/EXAMS model. 

The previous PRZM-EXAMS surface water modeling estimates were based on the Pennsylvania 

apple crop scenario. For this assessment, PA Apple and GA Pecan scenarios were re-evaluated 

with the use of updated Perl shell interface program, PE5.pl (November 15, 2006), according to

the current modeling input parameter guidance (Version 2.1; US EPA, Oct. 22, 2009). 

Additionally, seven scenarios were modeled for the proposed uses. Fruiting vegetables were 

represented by Pennsylvania, California, and Florida tomato and Florida pepper scenarios, edible

podded beans by Michigan beans and Oregon snap beans scenarios, and hops were represented 

by Oregon hops scenario. Currently, EFED does not have an okra scenario; therefore, Florida 

tomato and pepper scenarios were considered to be surrogate scenarios for the okra proposed 

uses. Okra can be grown throughout the Florida state, but commercial production is concentrated 

in the Dade County area and bordering counties. In 2004, Florida okra production was estimated 

at 1,500 acres (Florida Crop Profile: http://www.ipmcenters.org/CropProfiles/docs/FLokra.pdf).

Acequinocyl ground water EDWCs are the same as assessed in the previous drinking water 

assessment since the proposed application rates and intervals are the same as currently registered 

food uses.

3. ANALYSIS

3.1. Fate and Transport Characterization

Based on the environmental fate data reviewed for the initial registration that appeared to be of 

uncertain quality, acequinocyl appeared to undergo fairly rapid transformation in most aquatic 

and terrestrial environments. The chemical hydrolyzed with a half-life of a few hours to less than 

2 days under neutral and alkaline pH conditions (MRID 45434908). However, it was stable 

under acidic pH conditions. Photodegradation in water appeared to be the main route of 

degradation in aquatic environments, with half-lives of less than 15 minutes in sterile lab and 

river water. Acequinocyl also appeared to undergo fast degradation in terrestrial environments. 

The half-lives for aerobic biotransformation on soil were less than 2 days under laboratory

conditions (MRID 45434911). Under field conditions, acequinocyl applied to bare plots 

dissipated with half-lives ranging from 2 hrs in California to 14 hours in New York (MRID 

45651601). In contrast, the residue decline data submitted for the Magnitude of Residue studies 

on apples, pears, oranges, grapefruit, lemon and almonds indicated a mean half-life of 20 days. 
8

Acequinocyl presented very low mobility in soil. The soil adsorption Kd for acequinocyl ranged

from 678 ml/g in sandy loam soil to 1,620 ml/g in silty clay loam soil (MRID 45531902) based 

on a study with one test concentration as opposite of four test concentrations as Subdivision N 

guidelines specify. In the field studies, the parent was not detected below 0-15 cm soil depth 

(MRID 45651601). The major transformation products detected in the field included R1 (2-

dodecyl-3-hydroxy-1, 4-napthoquinone) and AKM-18 [2-(1,2-dioxotetradecyl) benzoic acid].

Based on acequinocyl bioconcentration factor in fish (BCF ranged from 307 to 387 (MRID 

45434923)) and its rather high octanol/water partition coefficient (Log Kow ≥ 6.2), acequinocyl

can expect to bioconcentrate in fish if found in water. Since acequinocyl has low vapor pressure

of 1.7 x 10-9PA (at 25 oC) and very low water solubility of 0.006 mg/L, any losses due to 

volatilization are expected to be minimal. Further details on fate studies and other fate properties 

of acequinocyl can be accessed from the original risk assessment document (US EPA, 2004). 

Table 3 provides summary of physical and chemical properties of acequinocyl. Table 1.1 of

Appendix I provides a summary of acequinocyl major degradates and their maximum percent 

formation observed in the laboratory and field studies.

Table 3. Physical and Chemical Properties of AcequinocylA

Common Name: Acequinocyl

CAS Chemical Name: 2-(acetyloxy)-3-dodecyl-1,4-naphthalenedione

CAS Registry No.: 57960-19-7

PC Code: 006329

Pesticide Type: Miticide

Chemical Family: Quinoline

Registrant: Arysta LifeScience North America, LLC

Trade Names: Kanemite 15 SC (EPA Reg. #: 66330-38)

Target Pests: Tetranychus, Panonychus and Eutetranychus spp

of mites

Formulation: Product–KanemiteTM 15 SC; 1.25 lb ai/gal

Types of Formulations: Technical (96.8% ai); End-Use Product (15.8%)

Empirical Formula: C24H32O4

Structural Formula of Acequinocyl

O

O

CH2(CH2)

10CH3

OCOCH3

Structural Formula of Acequinocyl Major 

Degradate:

Acequinocyl-OH 

Hydroxy acequinocyl or R1

2-Dodecyl-3-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone

PC Code: 606329; CAS # 57960-31-3

O

O

CH2(CH2)

10CH3

OH

Appearance: Pale yellow

Physical State: Liquid Suspension
9

Table 3. Physical and Chemical Properties of AcequinocylA

Vapor Pressure: 1.69 x 10-9pascals at 250C (technical)

Water Solubility: 6.69 μg/L at 200C (technical)

Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient (Log 

Kow):

6.2 (technical)

Molecular Weight: 384.5

Melting Point: 59.6C (technical)

Density: 1.13 g/cm3

A

- These physical and chemical properties are for the end-use product unless otherwise noted.

3.2. Drinking Water Exposure Modeling

3.2.1. Surface Water Modeling

The Tier II drinking water assessment was performed using PRZM (v3.12.2; May 12, 

2005)/EXAMS (v. 2.98.04.06; April 25, 2005) modeling with index reservoir (IR) scenarios and 

percent cropped area (PCA) adjustment factors. In performing the drinking water assessment for 

the proposed acequinocyl uses, two approaches were taken. In Approach #1, acequinocyl was 

conservatively assumed to be stable to all routes of degradation because of the uncertainties 

associated with the environmental fate data. In Approach #2, total (acequinocyl + acequinocylOH) residues were modeled assuming that the R1 metabolite is of toxicological concern. All 

half-lives used in this modeling approach were calculated based on the total (acequinocyl + R1) 

residues. Additionally, the adsorption coefficient (Kd) for the metabolite R1 was used in the 

modeling as R1 is more mobile than acequinocyl.

Table 3 lists the input parameters used for the PRZM/EXAMS modeling of acequinocyl and the 

R1 degradate. Table 4 presents PRZM/EXAMS estimated drinking water concentrations from 

surface water sources for acequinocyl and the R1 degradate for proposed (apples and pecans) and 

registered (fruiting vegetables, edible podded beans, okra, and hopes) uses.

Table 4. PRZM/EXAMS Inputs Parameter Values for Acequinocyl Total Toxic Residue 

 Approach 1 and 2.

Parameter (Units) Input Value and Unit Source of Information Approach #1

1 Approach #22

Maximum Application Rate 0.3 lb ai/acre (all uses) Proposed label

Maximum Number of Applications 2 Proposed label

Minimum Reapplications Interval 21 days Proposed label

Modeling Scenarios PA Apple

Fruiting Vegetable:

Pepper: FL Pepper

Tomato: CA Tomato

 PA Tomato

 FL Tomato

Edible Podded Beans:

MI Beans

OR Snap Beans

Hops:

EFED standard PRZM/EXAMS 

scenarios
10

Table 4. PRZM/EXAMS Inputs Parameter Values for Acequinocyl Total Toxic Residue 

 Approach 1 and 2.

Parameter (Units) Input Value and Unit Source of Information

OR Hops 

Initial Application Dates (dd-mm) 1/4 (PA Apple)

24/5(GA Pecans)

Fruiting Vegetables:

Pepper: FL Pepper: 15-10 (okra)

Tomato: CA Tomato: 21-07

 PA Tomato: 01-09

 FL Tomato: 01-04 (okra)

Edible Podded Beans:

MI Beans: 08-06

OR Snap Beans: 22-06

Hops:

OR Hops: 07-04

EFED application dates from DP 337381, 

330467, 330471

Application Method Ground, Foliar (CAM = 2) Acequinocyl is a foliar application

Application Efficiency Fraction 0.99 EFED standard default for ground 

applications

Spray Drift Loading Fraction 0.064 ground

0.063 air blast (apples)

EFED standard default for ground 

applications for all, but apples

Incorporation depth (cm) 0 Default for foliar applications

Molecular Weight (g/mole) 384.5 Product Chemistry

Water Solubility (mg/L) 0.0067 Product Chemistry

Vapor Pressure (torr) 1.268 × 10-6Product Chemistry

Henry’s Law Constant (atm-m

3

/mol) 3.9 × 10-5Product Chemistry

Kd (ml/g) 1027 970 MRID 45531902; 45434907

Hydrolysis Half-life (days) stable 9.6 MRID 45434908

Aqueous Photolysis Half-life (days) stable 0.19 MRID 45434909

Aerobic Soil Metabolism (days) stable 48.53 MRID 45434911

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism (days) stable 97 Twice the aerobic soil metabolism t1/2

based on the Input Parameter Guidance 

Manual, Pesticides (Version 2.1; Oct. 22, 

2009)1

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism (days) stable 649.8 MRID 45434913

1

Parent was assumed to be stable in the environment

2Combined half-live values for parent acequinocyl and acequinocyl-OH (R1) degradate

3The average of four Kads values (678, 1,620, 761, and 1,050) was used (1067), as the study was conducted only on one 

concentration.

4Binding was not correlated with organic carbon content so the mean Kads value of four values (3,400, 27, 380, and 72) was used

(970). 

5This half-life value represents the upper 90 percent confidence of the mean for acequinocyl+R1 residues

Table 5. PRZM/EXAMS Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations (EDWCs) for 

Acequinocyl Total Toxic Residue based on Approachs #1 and #2

A

.

Scenario

Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations

from Surface Water Sources (μg/L)

1-in-10 year annual peak 1-in-10 year annual mean 36 year annual

mean

Approach #1: Total Toxic Residues (no acequinocyl degradation)

PA Apples 12.22 1.79 1.41

PA Tomato 12.08 2.45 2.02

FL Tomato 8.55 1.70 1.12
11

Table 5. PRZM/EXAMS Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations (EDWCs) for 

Acequinocyl Total Toxic Residue based on Approachs #1 and #2

A

.

Scenario

Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations

from Surface Water Sources (μg/L)

1-in-10 year annual peak 1-in-10 year annual mean 36 year annual

mean

CA Tomato 1.95 0.36 0.25

FL Peppers 9.07 1.74 1.11

MI Beans 6.90 1.80 1.29

OR Snap Beans 7.19 2.19 1.53

OR Hops 6.94 1.65 1.27

Approach #2: Total Toxic Residues (combined acequinocyl and R1)

GA Pecans 5.14 0.17 0.11

PA Tomato 3.99 0.29 0.20

FL Tomato 1.37 0.09 0.06

CA Tomato 0.68 0.03 0.03

FL Peppers 1.56 0.06 0.04

MI Beans 1.66 0.10 0.08

OR Snap Beans 0.72 0.09 0.07

OR Hops 0.76 0.05 0.04

A

– A default PCA of 0.87 was applied

Regardless of the food crop use, a default PCA value of 0.87 was applied to EDWCs. Among all 

the registered and proposed new uses, the highest EDWCs from surface water sources were 

derived using Approach #1 for ground application of acequinocyl to PA apples scenario for the 

acute value, and Pennsylvania tomato scenario for the chronic values simulated at the maximum

annual application rate of 0.6 lb ai/acre. The acute EDWCs in surface water (1-in-10 year annual 

peak concentration) reached a maximum of 12.2 μg/L (PA Apple), the chronic non-cancer 

EDWC (1- in-10 year annual average concentration) is expected not to exceed 2.45 μg/L (PA 

Tomato), and the cancer/chronic drinking water concentration (30-year annual average) is 

expected not to exceed 2.02 μg/L (PA Tomato). The PRZM/EXAMS output files for selected 

modeled scenarios are provided in the Appendix II.

3.2.2. Ground Water Modeling

Estimated concentrations of acequinocyl total toxic residues in drinking water from shallow 

ground water sources for the proposed uses are the same as for currently registered uses because 

the application rates and intervals are the same for both uses. Therefore, the estimated 

environmental concentrations are not expected to exceed 3.6 x 10-3μg/L based on the maximum 

application rate of 0.6 lb ai/acre. This concentration can be considered as both the acute and 

chronic value. For details regarding SCI-GROW modeling refer to the previous drinking water 

assessment (US EPA, 2007). 

3.2.3. Assumptions and Uncertainties

The following uncertainties have been identified in the environmental fate properties and 

drinking water assessment for acequinocyl:
12

• Most of the environmental fate studies submitted prior to the initial registration were 

classified ‘supplemental’ due to deficiencies identified in the fate studies such as poor 

chromatographic separation of acequinocyl and R1, use of chloroform : methanol solvent 

system, lack of LOD and LOQ data, un-eluted radioactive residues in the solid phase 

extraction process, and lack of storage stability data.

• In PRZM/EXAMS modeling, Approach #1, acequinocyl was conservatively assumed to 

be stable to all routes of degradation to account for the uncertainties associated with the 

environmental fate data. This approach generated conservative, upper bound, EDWCs 

for acequinocyl. Therefore, exposure to acequinocyl maybe overestimated. 

• The impact of spray drift buffers was not considered in this drinking water assessment. 

With a 75 ft. spray drift buffer (spray drift fraction = .006), the ground application 

effective drift to a water body would be smaller than without the buffer (0.063). 

However, based on comparison of EDWCs (not corrected for PCA) derived for the PA 

Apples scenario with and without the 75 ft spray drift buffer, the impact of spray drift on 

the EDWCs is minimal. 

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.1 14.044 8.871 4.6167 3.0479 2.7325 2.0553 (Spray drift fraction = .063)

0.1 13.965 8.7949 4.5306 2.9738 2.6666 1.9749 (Spray drift fraction = .006)

• SCI-GROW estimated the concentration of acequinocyl (Approach #1) and total residue 

(acequinocyl+R1; Approach #2) in shallow ground water sources to be <0.0036 μg/L. 

The ground water EDWCs were obtained using the median Koc value of 37,550 ml/g for 

acequinocyl, and the median Koc value of 36,000 ml/g for the total (acequinocyl+R1) 

residues, which are greater than the Koc limit of 9,995 ml/g, and are beyond the scope of 

the regression data used in SCI GROW development. If there are concerns for such 

chemicals, a higher tier groundwater exposure assessment should be considered, 

regardless of the concentration returned by SCI-GROW.

• Two method validation studies (MRID 46182601 and 46182602) submitted by the 

registrant to determine the concentrations of acequinocyl and its metabolite(s) in soil and 

water extracts were reviewed by the EPA’s Environmental Chemistry Laboratory. The 

registrant was informed of the suggested amendments and request for new calibration 

data in a memo dated 27 June, 2007. Recently, the registrant submitted the amended 

analytical method for determination of residues of acequinocyl and its major metabolite 

R1 (hydroxy-acequinocyl) in drinking water, ground water and surface water (MRID 

48016602), and the amended analytical method for the determination of acequinocyl, 

hydroxy-acequinocyl, and AKM-18 in soil (MRID 48016601). The Agency is in the 

process of reviewing these submitted studies.

 3.3. Drinking Water Treatment

No specific information was available for the behavior of acequinocyl during drinking water 

treatment.
13

4. DATA REQUIREMENTS

Most of the environmental fate studies submitted prior to the initial registration were classified 

‘supplemental’ due to deficiencies such as poor chromatographic separation of acequinocyl and 

R1, use of chloroform: methanol solvent system, lack of LOD and LOQ data, un-eluted 

radioactive residues in the solid phase extraction process, and lack of storage stability data. 

These issues need to be addressed by the registrant to upgrade the fate studies.

REFERENCES

Orr, Gary R. 2009. Determination of Acequinocyl, Acequinocyl-OH, and AKM-18 in Soil 

Minor Analytical Revision of Method-136, Revision #2. Performing Laboratory: Arysta 

LifeScience North America, LLC. Laboratory Project ID: ARY-0413-2455153. Completion 

Date: November 18, 2009. (MRID 48016601) 

Orr, Gary R. 2009. Determination of Residues of AKD 2023 and Its Major Metabolite R1 

(Hydroxy AKD'2023) in Drinking Water, Ground Water and Surface Water. Minor Analytical 

Revision of Method-AGK/076. Arysta LifeScience North America, LLC. Laboratory Project ID: 

ARY-0413- 2455183. Completion Date: December 18, 2009. (MRID 48016602) 

U.S. EPA. 2003. Section 3 Request for Uses of Acequinocyl (P.C. Code: 006329) on 

Greenhouse, Shade house, Ornamental, Floral, Foliage and Nursery Crops. August 7, 2003 (DP 

Barcode D291707)

U.S. EPA. 2004. Section 3 Request for Uses of Acequinocyl (P.C. Code: 006329) on Pome 

Fruits, Citrus, Almonds, Pistachios, Strawberries and Outdoor Ornamentals submitted under 

DP Barcodes: D285811, D286428, D289153, D290010, D287269, D290009, D291174. 

February 3, 2004. (US EPA 2004, DP Barcodes: D285811, D286428, D289153, D290010, 

D287269, D290009, D291174)

U.S. EPA. 2005. Data Evaluation Record Review for Three Studies on Acequinocyl . August 

31, 2005 (D309566, D309568)

U.S. EPA. 2007. Ecological Risk Assessment for Use of Acequinocyl (PC 006329) on Grapes, 

Pome Fruits, Citrus, Nuts, and Outdoor Non-Food Uses. August 17, 2007. (US EPA 2007, DP 

337381, 330467, 330471)

U.S. EPA. 2007. Tier II Drinking Water Assessment for Acequinocyl. June 27, 2007 (US EPA 

2007, DP337221)

U.S. EPA. 2007. PP#s 6F7040 and #7F7176. Human-Health Risk Assessment for the Proposed 

Uses of Acequinocyl on Grapes, the Tree Nut Crop Group, and Residential Sites (Ornamentals). 

September 6, 2007 (US EPA, DPs: 330281and 337378)
APPENDIX I

Table 1.1. Summary of Acequinocyl Major Degradates and Maximum Percent Formation Observed

in the Laboratory and Field Studies.

Degradate 

Max Degradate Concentration (% of applied) and Time (days1) to Max Concentration

Hydrolysis Aqueous 

Photolysis

Soil 

Photolysis

Aerobic Soil 

Metabolism

Anaerobic 

Aquatic

Aerobic 

Aquatic

TFD

Hydroxyl-acequinocyl

(2-dodecyl-3-hydroxy-1,4-

naphthaledione, R1) 

pH 7: 

54.7% (96 hrs)

River water:

11.6% (2 hrs)

 33.8% (2 days) Water:

18% (0)

Sediment:

41.5% (3)

12.2% (0 days) NY: 37.8% (3 hrs)

GA: 37.8% 2

CA: 26.4% 2

AKM 18 [2-(1,2-

dioxotetradecyl)benzoic 

acid]

pH 7: 

7.1% (48 hrs)

23.7% (6 days) 9.2% (2 days) Water:

18% (0)

Sediment:

41.5% (3)

19.5% (1 day) NY: 16.5% (single 

replicate; 3 hrs)

AKM-08 [2-(2-oxododecyl)-3-hydroxy-1,4-

naphthoquinone]

Buffer solution:

12.9% (2 hrs)

O-Phthalic acid 

Buffer solution:

12.7% (24 hrs)

River water:

11.9% (24 hrs)

Phenol

River water:

10% (24 hrs)

CBAA (2-carboxy-α-oxobenzene acetic acid)

11.3% (2 days)

1 Unless otherwise specified.2

Formed immediately after application.
APPENDIX II

PRZM/EXAMS Modeling Output Files for Acequinocyl

Acequinocyl applied to PA Apples via air blast application

stored as acyquPAappleIRab.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: PAappleSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14751.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:00

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 3.179 1.919 0.7495 0.6019 0.5264 0.2365

1962 2.964 1.948 0.9531 0.7382 0.7249 0.5172

1963 1.302 0.9633 0.7407 0.6792 0.6589 0.5986

1964 2.782 1.894 1.025 0.878 0.8283 0.7192

1965 2.139 1.557 1.036 0.8714 0.8441 0.7661

1966 14.17 8.619 3.289 2.012 1.796 1.05

1967 5.168 3.993 2.6 2.056 1.896 1.497

1968 10.16 6.622 3.131 2.252 2.083 1.712

1969 14.08 8.899 4.68 3.049 2.728 1.945

1970 4.042 3.158 2.537 2.269 2.154 1.968

1971 8.648 5.727 3.066 2.342 2.15 1.727

1972 28.38 18.37 7.265 4.391 3.865 2.432

1973 7.87 5.442 3.045 2.446 2.34 2.229

1974 5.247 4.227 2.632 2.324 2.186 1.891

1975 13.72 9.534 4.425 3.038 2.733 2.032

1976 7.923 5.358 2.927 2.324 2.249 2.057

1977 2.643 2.493 2.25 2.208 2.155 1.787

1978 5.688 3.976 2.934 2.218 2.076 1.759

1979 5.086 3.745 2.654 2.154 1.998 1.781

1980 4.411 3.22 2.271 1.829 1.756 1.585

1981 3.326 2.533 1.952 1.636 1.549 1.43

1982 9.712 6.48 4.638 3.119 2.792 1.897

1983 4.951 3.712 2.402 1.978 1.891 1.707

1984 8.199 5.472 3.083 2.652 2.453 1.965

1985 4.864 3.556 2.534 2.132 2.026 1.895

1986 7.542 5.197 2.904 2.352 2.191 1.893

1987 5.524 3.917 3.184 2.341 2.242 1.874

1988 5.101 3.668 2.226 2.067 1.954 1.734

1989 6.905 4.995 3.101 2.436 2.449 1.955

1990 7.618 5.162 2.786 2.303 2.299 2.04

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 28.38 18.37 7.265 4.391 3.865 2.432

0.0645161290322581 14.17 9.534 4.68 3.119 2.792 2.229

0.0967741935483871 14.08 8.899 4.638 3.049 2.733 2.057

0.129032258064516 13.72 8.619 4.425 3.038 2.728 2.04

0.161290322580645 10.16 6.622 3.289 2.652 2.453 2.032

0.193548387096774 9.712 6.48 3.184 2.446 2.449 1.968

0.225806451612903 8.648 5.727 3.131 2.436 2.34 1.965

0.258064516129032 8.199 5.472 3.101 2.352 2.299 1.955

0.290322580645161 7.923 5.442 3.083 2.342 2.249 1.945

0.32258064516129 7.87 5.358 3.066 2.341 2.242 1.897

0.354838709677419 7.618 5.197 3.045 2.324 2.191 1.895

0.387096774193548 7.542 5.162 2.934 2.324 2.186 1.893

0.419354838709677 6.905 4.995 2.927 2.303 2.155 1.891

0.451612903225806 5.688 4.227 2.904 2.269 2.154 1.874

0.483870967741936 5.524 3.993 2.786 2.252 2.15 1.787

0.516129032258065 5.247 3.976 2.654 2.218 2.083 1.781

0.548387096774194 5.168 3.917 2.632 2.208 2.076 1.759

0.580645161290323 5.101 3.745 2.6 2.154 2.026 1.734

0.612903225806452 5.086 3.712 2.537 2.132 1.998 1.727

0.645161290322581 4.951 3.668 2.534 2.067 1.954 1.712

0.67741935483871 4.864 3.556 2.402 2.056 1.896 1.707
16

0.709677419354839 4.411 3.22 2.271 2.012 1.891 1.585

0.741935483870968 4.042 3.158 2.25 1.978 1.796 1.497

0.774193548387097 3.326 2.533 2.226 1.829 1.756 1.43

0.806451612903226 3.179 2.493 1.952 1.636 1.549 1.05

0.838709677419355 2.964 1.948 1.036 0.878 0.8441 0.7661

0.870967741935484 2.782 1.919 1.025 0.8714 0.8283 0.7192

0.903225806451613 2.643 1.894 0.9531 0.7382 0.7249 0.5986

0.935483870967742 2.139 1.557 0.7495 0.6792 0.6589 0.5172

0.967741935483871 1.302 0.9633 0.7407 0.6019 0.5264 0.2365

0.1 14.044 8.871 4.6167 3.0479 2.7325 2.0553

Average of yearly averages: 1.62265333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acyquPAappleIRab

Metfile: w14751.dvf

PRZM scenario: PAappleSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 1067 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 0 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 0 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 0 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.063 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 01-04 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to PA Tomato via ground application

stored as acequPAtomatoIRgr.out

stored as acequPAtomatoIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: PAtomatoSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14751.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:00

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 1.779 1.197 0.5114 0.3661 0.2586 0.07922

1962 6.747 4.219 1.784 1.564 1.555 0.8346

1963 7.528 4.787 2.425 2.111 1.749 1.317

1964 4.347 3.084 2.441 2.163 2.032 1.658

1965 7.224 5.199 2.957 2.284 2.097 1.69

1966 10.7 6.884 3.633 2.511 2.43 2.004

1967 5.832 4.144 2.867 2.485 2.333 2.124

1968 9.394 6.282 3.334 2.572 2.5 2.184

1969 7.62 5.156 3.329 2.526 2.319 2.103
17

1970 6.631 4.687 3.385 2.856 2.772 2.425

1971 8.706 5.903 3.752 2.695 2.536 2.297

1972 15.94 10.3 4.749 3.422 3.036 2.72

1973 9.625 6.562 3.682 3.026 2.9 2.691

1974 7.019 5.576 3.351 2.793 2.712 2.55

1975 21.72 15.3 6.746 4.445 3.94 2.738

1976 14.15 9.192 4.759 3.49 3.396 2.819

1977 5.125 4.516 3.546 3.235 3.189 2.741

1978 4.91 4.358 3.486 3.278 3.234 2.673

1979 10.16 7.459 4.726 3.984 3.634 2.92

1980 9.807 6.536 3.483 3.142 2.808 2.439

1981 7.55 5.372 3.309 3.002 2.839 2.426

1982 7.419 5.274 4.136 3.124 2.895 2.596

1983 10.47 7.623 4.697 3.475 3.212 2.599

1984 6.335 4.671 3.375 3.153 3.095 2.81

1985 7.595 5.403 3.608 3.052 2.935 2.697

1986 6.958 5.045 3.298 3.155 3.045 2.736

1987 9.005 6.325 4.058 3.214 3.282 2.824

1988 7.619 5.348 3.408 3.275 3.083 2.607

1989 11.51 8.42 4.366 3.333 3.089 2.585

1990 10.17 6.907 3.993 3.314 3.088 2.695

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 21.72 15.3 6.746 4.445 3.94 2.92

0.0645161290322581 15.94 10.3 4.759 3.984 3.634 2.824

0.0967741935483871 14.15 9.192 4.749 3.49 3.396 2.819

0.129032258064516 11.51 8.42 4.726 3.475 3.282 2.81

0.161290322580645 10.7 7.623 4.697 3.422 3.234 2.741

0.193548387096774 10.47 7.459 4.366 3.333 3.212 2.738

0.225806451612903 10.17 6.907 4.136 3.314 3.189 2.736

0.258064516129032 10.16 6.884 4.058 3.278 3.095 2.72

0.290322580645161 9.807 6.562 3.993 3.275 3.089 2.697

0.32258064516129 9.625 6.536 3.752 3.235 3.088 2.695

0.354838709677419 9.394 6.325 3.682 3.214 3.083 2.691

0.387096774193548 9.005 6.282 3.633 3.155 3.045 2.673

0.419354838709677 8.706 5.903 3.608 3.153 3.036 2.607

0.451612903225806 7.62 5.576 3.546 3.142 2.935 2.599

0.483870967741936 7.619 5.403 3.486 3.124 2.9 2.596

0.516129032258065 7.595 5.372 3.483 3.052 2.895 2.585

0.548387096774194 7.55 5.348 3.408 3.026 2.839 2.55

0.580645161290323 7.528 5.274 3.385 3.002 2.808 2.439

0.612903225806452 7.419 5.199 3.375 2.856 2.772 2.426

0.645161290322581 7.224 5.156 3.351 2.793 2.712 2.425

0.67741935483871 7.019 5.045 3.334 2.695 2.536 2.297

0.709677419354839 6.958 4.787 3.329 2.572 2.5 2.184

0.741935483870968 6.747 4.687 3.309 2.526 2.43 2.124

0.774193548387097 6.631 4.671 3.298 2.511 2.333 2.103

0.806451612903226 6.335 4.516 2.957 2.485 2.319 2.004

0.838709677419355 5.832 4.358 2.867 2.284 2.097 1.69

0.870967741935484 5.125 4.219 2.441 2.163 2.032 1.658

0.903225806451613 4.91 4.144 2.425 2.111 1.749 1.317

0.935483870967742 4.347 3.084 1.784 1.564 1.555 0.8346

0.967741935483871 1.779 1.197 0.5114 0.3661 0.2586 0.07922

0.1 13.886 9.1148 4.7467 3.4885 3.3846 2.8181

Average of yearly averages: 2.319394

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequPAtomatoIRgr

Metfile: w14751.dvf

PRZM scenario: PAtomatoSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr
18

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 1067 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 0 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 0 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 0 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.064 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 01-09 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to FL Tomato via ground application

stored as acequFLtomatoIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: FLtomatoSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:38

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w12844.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:22

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 0.855 0.471 0.1576 0.1257 0.1175 0.07271

1962 1.527 1.004 0.6013 0.4288 0.4265 0.2604

1963 3.229 2.043 0.9123 0.643 0.5727 0.4102

1964 3.418 2.54 1.348 1.145 1.109 0.8295

1965 4.884 3.282 1.945 1.317 1.152 0.9196

1966 5.541 3.894 2.129 1.763 1.68 1.208

1967 3.441 2.355 1.55 1.256 1.222 1.047

1968 6.169 4.401 3.121 2.282 2.072 1.41

1969 6.583 4.244 2.32 1.81 1.707 1.443

1970 4.007 2.815 2.098 1.681 1.551 1.305

1971 5.332 3.768 1.867 1.372 1.258 1.067

1972 7.007 4.343 2.57 2.18 2.173 1.5

1973 3.428 2.443 1.67 1.513 1.486 1.258

1974 5.076 3.162 1.692 1.319 1.306 1.132

1975 5.346 3.408 1.986 1.39 1.252 1.033

1976 8.853 6.256 2.6 1.753 1.658 1.246

1977 8.261 5.447 2.908 2.202 1.93 1.546

1978 7.068 4.539 2.513 1.985 1.796 1.545

1979 11.58 6.84 3.077 2.3 2.03 1.631

1980 5.08 3.438 2.4 1.897 1.768 1.526

1981 6.514 4.355 2.202 1.846 1.758 1.312

1982 9.56 6.149 3.395 2.533 2.517 1.984

1983 6.744 4.514 3.084 2.31 2.272 2.012

1984 10.84 7.785 3.346 2.409 2.254 1.974

1985 4.533 3.642 2.559 2.108 2.049 1.682

1986 5.93 3.817 2.048 1.838 1.702 1.537

1987 6.063 4.1 2.344 2.041 1.829 1.472

1988 9.862 6.313 3.364 2.727 2.715 1.786

1989 4.668 3.281 1.878 1.474 1.417 1.266

1990 6.847 4.39 2.507 1.956 1.907 1.325

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 11.58 7.785 3.395 2.727 2.715 2.012

0.0645161290322581 10.84 6.84 3.364 2.533 2.517 1.984
19

0.0967741935483871 9.862 6.313 3.346 2.409 2.272 1.974

0.129032258064516 9.56 6.256 3.121 2.31 2.254 1.786

0.161290322580645 8.853 6.149 3.084 2.3 2.173 1.682

0.193548387096774 8.261 5.447 3.077 2.282 2.072 1.631

0.225806451612903 7.068 4.539 2.908 2.202 2.049 1.546

0.258064516129032 7.007 4.514 2.6 2.18 2.03 1.545

0.290322580645161 6.847 4.401 2.57 2.108 1.93 1.537

0.32258064516129 6.744 4.39 2.559 2.041 1.907 1.526

0.354838709677419 6.583 4.355 2.513 1.985 1.829 1.5

0.387096774193548 6.514 4.343 2.507 1.956 1.796 1.472

0.419354838709677 6.169 4.244 2.4 1.897 1.768 1.443

0.451612903225806 6.063 4.1 2.344 1.846 1.758 1.41

0.483870967741936 5.93 3.894 2.32 1.838 1.707 1.325

0.516129032258065 5.541 3.817 2.202 1.81 1.702 1.312

0.548387096774194 5.346 3.768 2.129 1.763 1.68 1.305

0.580645161290323 5.332 3.642 2.098 1.753 1.658 1.266

0.612903225806452 5.08 3.438 2.048 1.681 1.551 1.258

0.645161290322581 5.076 3.408 1.986 1.513 1.486 1.246

0.67741935483871 4.884 3.282 1.945 1.474 1.417 1.208

0.709677419354839 4.668 3.281 1.878 1.39 1.306 1.132

0.741935483870968 4.533 3.162 1.867 1.372 1.258 1.067

0.774193548387097 4.007 2.815 1.692 1.319 1.252 1.047

0.806451612903226 3.441 2.54 1.67 1.317 1.222 1.033

0.838709677419355 3.428 2.443 1.55 1.256 1.152 0.9196

0.870967741935484 3.418 2.355 1.348 1.145 1.109 0.8295

0.903225806451613 3.229 2.043 0.9123 0.643 0.5727 0.4102

0.935483870967742 1.527 1.004 0.6013 0.4288 0.4265 0.2604

0.967741935483871 0.855 0.471 0.1576 0.1257 0.1175 0.07271

0.1 9.8318 6.3073 3.3235 2.3991 2.2702 1.9552

Average of yearly averages: 1.29131366666667

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequFLtomatoIRgr

Metfile: w12844.dvf

PRZM scenario: FLtomatoSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 1067 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 0 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 0 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 0 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.064 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 01-04 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)
20

Acequinocyl applied to CA Tomato via ground application

stored as acequCAtomatoIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: CAtomato_WirrigSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:36

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w93193.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:12

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 0.7821 0.4661 0.1542 0.1124 0.08828 0.03182

1962 0.8405 0.5233 0.211 0.1701 0.1452 0.09456

1963 0.8787 0.5599 0.2478 0.2061 0.1821 0.1402

1964 0.8732 0.552 0.2404 0.1999 0.1745 0.1346

1965 0.907 0.589 0.2765 0.2352 0.2093 0.1684

1966 1.093 0.7625 0.3611 0.2295 0.2019 0.17

1967 0.9586 0.6468 0.3316 0.2865 0.2587 0.2187

1968 0.9329 0.6111 0.3044 0.2625 0.2468 0.2104

1969 2.527 1.639 0.9605 0.7394 0.6548 0.4668

1970 1.494 1.036 0.6386 0.5146 0.4743 0.4049

1971 1.039 0.7154 0.4019 0.3615 0.3348 0.3119

1972 0.983 0.6627 0.4117 0.3136 0.2827 0.2621

1973 1.14 0.7797 0.4298 0.3396 0.3165 0.2854

1974 0.9851 0.6651 0.3638 0.3106 0.2832 0.2616

1975 0.9672 0.6518 0.3366 0.2946 0.2666 0.227

1976 2.263 1.438 0.7086 0.4345 0.3805 0.3146

1977 1.043 0.7046 0.4234 0.3121 0.2845 0.2639

1978 2.051 1.576 0.7459 0.5693 0.5146 0.4098

1979 1.041 0.7181 0.4138 0.3816 0.3646 0.3155

1980 2.336 1.512 0.7288 0.5198 0.469 0.3631

1981 1.173 0.8086 0.4954 0.3831 0.3563 0.2998

1982 1.442 0.9798 0.486 0.4368 0.3869 0.3089

1983 2.098 1.403 1.009 0.7146 0.6373 0.4974

1984 1.075 0.7527 0.438 0.4087 0.3953 0.3563

1985 1.025 0.7051 0.3904 0.3508 0.3217 0.3034

1986 2.027 1.334 0.6561 0.51 0.4555 0.3835

1987 1.087 0.769 0.4608 0.4134 0.404 0.3597

1988 1.034 0.714 0.4289 0.358 0.3302 0.3105

1989 1.018 0.6968 0.3837 0.3454 0.3248 0.293

1990 1.331 0.9276 0.4819 0.3617 0.3302 0.2963

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 2.527 1.639 1.009 0.7394 0.6548 0.4974

0.0645161290322581 2.336 1.576 0.9605 0.7146 0.6373 0.4668

0.0967741935483871 2.263 1.512 0.7459 0.5693 0.5146 0.4098

0.129032258064516 2.098 1.438 0.7288 0.5198 0.4743 0.4049

0.161290322580645 2.051 1.403 0.7086 0.5146 0.469 0.3835

0.193548387096774 2.027 1.334 0.6561 0.51 0.4555 0.3631

0.225806451612903 1.494 1.036 0.6386 0.4368 0.404 0.3597

0.258064516129032 1.442 0.9798 0.4954 0.4345 0.3953 0.3563

0.290322580645161 1.331 0.9276 0.486 0.4134 0.3869 0.3155

0.32258064516129 1.173 0.8086 0.4819 0.4087 0.3805 0.3146

0.354838709677419 1.14 0.7797 0.4608 0.3831 0.3646 0.3119

0.387096774193548 1.093 0.769 0.438 0.3816 0.3563 0.3105

0.419354838709677 1.087 0.7625 0.4298 0.3617 0.3348 0.3089

0.451612903225806 1.075 0.7527 0.4289 0.3615 0.3302 0.3034

0.483870967741936 1.043 0.7181 0.4234 0.358 0.3302 0.2998

0.516129032258065 1.041 0.7154 0.4138 0.3508 0.3248 0.2963

0.548387096774194 1.039 0.714 0.4117 0.3454 0.3217 0.293

0.580645161290323 1.034 0.7051 0.4019 0.3396 0.3165 0.2854

0.612903225806452 1.025 0.7046 0.3904 0.3136 0.2845 0.2639

0.645161290322581 1.018 0.6968 0.3837 0.3121 0.2832 0.2621

0.67741935483871 0.9851 0.6651 0.3638 0.3106 0.2827 0.2616

0.709677419354839 0.983 0.6627 0.3611 0.2946 0.2666 0.227

0.741935483870968 0.9672 0.6518 0.3366 0.2865 0.2587 0.2187

0.774193548387097 0.9586 0.6468 0.3316 0.2625 0.2468 0.2104

0.806451612903226 0.9329 0.6111 0.3044 0.2352 0.2093 0.17

0.838709677419355 0.907 0.589 0.2765 0.2295 0.2019 0.1684

0.870967741935484 0.8787 0.5599 0.2478 0.2061 0.1821 0.1402
21

0.903225806451613 0.8732 0.552 0.2404 0.1999 0.1745 0.1346

0.935483870967742 0.8405 0.5233 0.211 0.1701 0.1452 0.09456

0.967741935483871 0.7821 0.4661 0.1542 0.1124 0.08828 0.03182

0.1 2.2465 1.5046 0.74419 0.56435 0.51057 0.40931

Average of yearly averages: 0.282136

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequCAtomatoIRgr

Metfile: w93193.dvf

PRZM scenario: CAtomato_WirrigSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 1067 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 0 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 0 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 0 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.064 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 21-07 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to MI Beans via ground application

stored as acequMIbeansIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: MIbeansSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:40

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14826.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:04

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 0.9652 0.6287 0.4439 0.294 0.2688 0.1312

1962 3.416 2.119 0.9855 0.6962 0.6105 0.3975

1963 1.821 1.274 0.6912 0.5941 0.5602 0.4685

1964 4.525 2.846 1.394 1.194 1.078 0.7438

1965 3.508 2.319 1.186 0.9836 0.9597 0.8528

1966 4.521 2.914 1.405 1.072 0.9939 0.8325

1967 3.851 2.591 1.633 1.282 1.212 1.036

1968 7.956 5.16 2.48 2.017 1.865 1.442

1969 5.785 4.002 2.507 1.987 1.968 1.699

1970 5.488 3.751 2.2 1.792 1.741 1.613

1971 4.324 2.981 1.882 1.726 1.693 1.49

1972 7.045 4.66 2.38 1.908 1.834 1.672

1973 3.626 2.933 2.201 2.026 1.931 1.707

1974 6.063 4.124 2.383 2.051 1.957 1.724

1975 9.841 7.465 4.25 2.847 2.575 2.081

1976 7.564 5.205 2.962 2.45 2.444 2.183
22

1977 3.965 3.276 2.131 2.074 1.977 1.761

1978 3.117 2.248 1.96 1.766 1.734 1.448

1979 6.938 4.603 2.415 1.761 1.599 1.351

1980 6.993 4.567 2.421 1.905 1.89 1.539

1981 5.654 4.433 2.52 2.183 2.038 1.777

1982 3.751 2.769 2.033 1.915 1.873 1.68

1983 6.115 4.109 2.27 1.871 1.841 1.611

1984 3.632 2.699 2.052 1.824 1.771 1.614

1985 8.186 5.852 3.702 2.655 2.402 1.951

1986 7.69 5.179 3.757 3.091 2.76 2.188

1987 5.665 4.209 2.599 2.394 2.254 1.999

1988 4.218 2.984 2.025 1.981 1.892 1.69

1989 6.054 4.605 2.649 2.311 2.213 1.884

1990 5.644 3.813 2.142 2.011 1.948 1.753

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 9.841 7.465 4.25 3.091 2.76 2.188

0.0645161290322581 8.186 5.852 3.757 2.847 2.575 2.183

0.0967741935483871 7.956 5.205 3.702 2.655 2.444 2.081

0.129032258064516 7.69 5.179 2.962 2.45 2.402 1.999

0.161290322580645 7.564 5.16 2.649 2.394 2.254 1.951

0.193548387096774 7.045 4.66 2.599 2.311 2.213 1.884

0.225806451612903 6.993 4.605 2.52 2.183 2.038 1.777

0.258064516129032 6.938 4.603 2.507 2.074 1.977 1.761

0.290322580645161 6.115 4.567 2.48 2.051 1.968 1.753

0.32258064516129 6.063 4.433 2.421 2.026 1.957 1.724

0.354838709677419 6.054 4.209 2.415 2.017 1.948 1.707

0.387096774193548 5.785 4.124 2.383 2.011 1.931 1.699

0.419354838709677 5.665 4.109 2.38 1.987 1.892 1.69

0.451612903225806 5.654 4.002 2.27 1.981 1.89 1.68

0.483870967741936 5.644 3.813 2.201 1.915 1.873 1.672

0.516129032258065 5.488 3.751 2.2 1.908 1.865 1.614

0.548387096774194 4.525 3.276 2.142 1.905 1.841 1.613

0.580645161290323 4.521 2.984 2.131 1.871 1.834 1.611

0.612903225806452 4.324 2.981 2.052 1.824 1.771 1.539

0.645161290322581 4.218 2.933 2.033 1.792 1.741 1.49

0.67741935483871 3.965 2.914 2.025 1.766 1.734 1.448

0.709677419354839 3.851 2.846 1.96 1.761 1.693 1.442

0.741935483870968 3.751 2.769 1.882 1.726 1.599 1.351

0.774193548387097 3.632 2.699 1.633 1.282 1.212 1.036

0.806451612903226 3.626 2.591 1.405 1.194 1.078 0.8528

0.838709677419355 3.508 2.319 1.394 1.072 0.9939 0.8325

0.870967741935484 3.416 2.248 1.186 0.9836 0.9597 0.7438

0.903225806451613 3.117 2.119 0.9855 0.6962 0.6105 0.4685

0.935483870967742 1.821 1.274 0.6912 0.5941 0.5602 0.3975

0.967741935483871 0.9652 0.6287 0.4439 0.294 0.2688 0.1312

0.1 7.9294 5.2024 3.628 2.6345 2.4398 2.0728

Average of yearly averages: 1.47731

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequMIbeansIRgr

Metfile: w14826.dvf

PRZM scenario: MIbeansSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 1067 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 0 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 0 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 0 days Halfife
23

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.064 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 08-06 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to OR Snap Beans via ground application

stored as acequORspbeansIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: ORsnbeansSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14826.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:04

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 1.069 0.6743 0.4521 0.3027 0.2801 0.1199

1962 2.216 1.443 0.8331 0.6384 0.5733 0.4282

1963 1.951 1.304 0.7539 0.658 0.6397 0.5304

1964 3.833 2.503 1.375 1.126 1.033 0.8109

1965 4.18 2.785 1.526 1.314 1.233 1.077

1966 3.803 2.592 1.535 1.232 1.155 1.056

1967 6.049 3.938 2.093 1.692 1.634 1.429

1968 8.092 5.359 2.735 2.183 2.071 1.825

1969 6.236 4.328 2.583 2.261 2.225 2.004

1970 4.12 3.022 2.038 1.998 1.976 1.806

1971 6.124 4.091 2.278 2.061 1.985 1.689

1972 6.393 4.393 2.557 2.162 2.122 2.025

1973 4.728 3.684 2.767 2.498 2.41 2.121

1974 6.289 4.477 3.005 2.739 2.615 2.224

1975 10.05 7.524 4.533 3.173 2.905 2.536

1976 6.248 4.538 3.282 2.942 2.821 2.505

1977 3.603 2.841 2.411 2.355 2.261 2.001

1978 4.229 3.083 2.501 2.124 2.06 1.721

1979 4.88 3.49 2.196 1.871 1.853 1.58

1980 5.342 3.756 2.527 1.949 2.02 1.797

1981 7.392 5.718 3.118 2.591 2.421 2.096

1982 4.813 3.527 2.41 2.333 2.294 2.032

1983 5.695 4.249 2.43 2.088 2.044 1.917

1984 4.694 3.707 2.636 2.264 2.174 1.915

1985 10.4 7.744 4.294 3.218 2.958 2.521

1986 8.279 6.263 4.481 3.608 3.249 2.652

1987 5.987 4.532 2.914 2.895 2.723 2.354

1988 5.471 3.783 2.5 2.334 2.24 1.975

1989 6.643 5.069 2.869 2.419 2.328 2.107

1990 6.741 4.554 2.522 2.398 2.33 2.023

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 10.4 7.744 4.533 3.608 3.249 2.652

0.0645161290322581 10.05 7.524 4.481 3.218 2.958 2.536

0.0967741935483871 8.279 6.263 4.294 3.173 2.905 2.521

0.129032258064516 8.092 5.718 3.282 2.942 2.821 2.505

0.161290322580645 7.392 5.359 3.118 2.895 2.723 2.354

0.193548387096774 6.741 5.069 3.005 2.739 2.615 2.224

0.225806451612903 6.643 4.554 2.914 2.591 2.421 2.121

0.258064516129032 6.393 4.538 2.869 2.498 2.41 2.107

0.290322580645161 6.289 4.532 2.767 2.419 2.33 2.096
24

0.32258064516129 6.248 4.477 2.735 2.398 2.328 2.032

0.354838709677419 6.236 4.393 2.636 2.355 2.294 2.025

0.387096774193548 6.124 4.328 2.583 2.334 2.261 2.023

0.419354838709677 6.049 4.249 2.557 2.333 2.24 2.004

0.451612903225806 5.987 4.091 2.527 2.264 2.225 2.001

0.483870967741936 5.695 3.938 2.522 2.261 2.174 1.975

0.516129032258065 5.471 3.783 2.501 2.183 2.122 1.917

0.548387096774194 5.342 3.756 2.5 2.162 2.071 1.915

0.580645161290323 4.88 3.707 2.43 2.124 2.06 1.825

0.612903225806452 4.813 3.684 2.411 2.088 2.044 1.806

0.645161290322581 4.728 3.527 2.41 2.061 2.02 1.797

0.67741935483871 4.694 3.49 2.278 1.998 1.985 1.721

0.709677419354839 4.229 3.083 2.196 1.949 1.976 1.689

0.741935483870968 4.18 3.022 2.093 1.871 1.853 1.58

0.774193548387097 4.12 2.841 2.038 1.692 1.634 1.429

0.806451612903226 3.833 2.785 1.535 1.314 1.233 1.077

0.838709677419355 3.803 2.592 1.526 1.232 1.155 1.056

0.870967741935484 3.603 2.503 1.375 1.126 1.033 0.8109

0.903225806451613 2.216 1.443 0.8331 0.658 0.6397 0.5304

0.935483870967742 1.951 1.304 0.7539 0.6384 0.5733 0.4282

0.967741935483871 1.069 0.6743 0.4521 0.3027 0.2801 0.1199

0.1 8.2603 6.2085 4.1928 3.1499 2.8966 2.5194

Average of yearly averages: 1.76258

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequORspbeansIRgr

Metfile: w14826.dvf

PRZM scenario: ORsnbeansSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 1067 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 0 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 0 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 0 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.064 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 22-06 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to OR Hops via ground application

stored as acequORhopsIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: ORhopsSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w24232.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:54

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)
25

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 2.078 1.269 0.4862 0.2545 0.2022 0.08444

1962 4.094 2.574 1.193 0.8098 0.7491 0.442

1963 3.374 2.626 1.505 1.299 1.193 0.9813

1964 7.296 5.412 2.338 1.533 1.3 1.109

1965 4.669 3.443 1.886 1.573 1.525 1.339

1966 4.522 3.292 1.899 1.579 1.585 1.383

1967 5.08 3.517 1.992 1.596 1.528 1.324

1968 4.504 3.415 2.286 1.886 1.845 1.601

1969 4.42 3.218 2.246 1.953 1.815 1.626

1970 5.182 2.981 2.253 2.078 1.974 1.668

1971 4.277 3.1 2.029 1.775 1.718 1.644

1972 6.408 4.349 2.494 1.991 1.892 1.597

1973 7.372 4.901 3.067 2.383 1.965 1.516

1974 5.983 4.544 2.801 2.247 2.167 1.814

1975 3.989 2.905 1.968 1.763 1.722 1.555

1976 3.921 3.192 2.039 1.785 1.724 1.453

1977 5.463 4.097 2.517 1.876 1.56 1.152

1978 4.086 2.936 1.939 1.751 1.676 1.518

1979 4.619 3.235 2.173 1.953 1.825 1.572

1980 8.044 5.762 2.984 2.482 2.11 1.809

1981 5.28 3.856 2.797 2.487 2.433 2.018

1982 4.28 3.232 2.493 2.273 2.187 1.919

1983 4.175 3.378 2.585 2.309 2.226 1.907

1984 5.835 4.016 2.46 2.143 1.927 1.71

1985 3.341 2.5 1.805 1.757 1.711 1.544

1986 5.156 3.723 2.171 1.733 1.639 1.386

1987 8.766 6.211 3.519 2.103 1.811 1.546

1988 5.046 3.54 2.365 1.977 1.889 1.597

1989 9.203 6.023 2.808 1.95 1.709 1.442

1990 4.414 3.34 2.269 2.056 1.945 1.677

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 9.203 6.211 3.519 2.487 2.433 2.018

0.0645161290322581 8.766 6.023 3.067 2.482 2.226 1.919

0.0967741935483871 8.044 5.762 2.984 2.383 2.187 1.907

0.129032258064516 7.372 5.412 2.808 2.309 2.167 1.814

0.161290322580645 7.296 4.901 2.801 2.273 2.11 1.809

0.193548387096774 6.408 4.544 2.797 2.247 1.974 1.71

0.225806451612903 5.983 4.349 2.585 2.143 1.965 1.677

0.258064516129032 5.835 4.097 2.517 2.103 1.945 1.668

0.290322580645161 5.463 4.016 2.494 2.078 1.927 1.644

0.32258064516129 5.28 3.856 2.493 2.056 1.892 1.626

0.354838709677419 5.182 3.723 2.46 1.991 1.889 1.601

0.387096774193548 5.156 3.54 2.365 1.977 1.845 1.597

0.419354838709677 5.08 3.517 2.338 1.953 1.825 1.597

0.451612903225806 5.046 3.443 2.286 1.953 1.815 1.572

0.483870967741936 4.669 3.415 2.269 1.95 1.811 1.555

0.516129032258065 4.619 3.378 2.253 1.886 1.724 1.546

0.548387096774194 4.522 3.34 2.246 1.876 1.722 1.544

0.580645161290323 4.504 3.292 2.173 1.785 1.718 1.518

0.612903225806452 4.42 3.235 2.171 1.775 1.711 1.516

0.645161290322581 4.414 3.232 2.039 1.763 1.709 1.453

0.67741935483871 4.28 3.218 2.029 1.757 1.676 1.442

0.709677419354839 4.277 3.192 1.992 1.751 1.639 1.386

0.741935483870968 4.175 3.1 1.968 1.733 1.585 1.383

0.774193548387097 4.094 2.981 1.939 1.596 1.56 1.339

0.806451612903226 4.086 2.936 1.899 1.579 1.528 1.324

0.838709677419355 3.989 2.905 1.886 1.573 1.525 1.152

0.870967741935484 3.921 2.626 1.805 1.533 1.3 1.109

0.903225806451613 3.374 2.574 1.505 1.299 1.193 0.9813

0.935483870967742 3.341 2.5 1.193 0.8098 0.7491 0.442

0.967741935483871 2.078 1.269 0.4862 0.2545 0.2022 0.08444

0.1 7.9768 5.727 2.9664 2.3756 2.185 1.8977

Average of yearly averages: 1.464458

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006
26

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequORhopsIRgr

Metfile: w24232.dvf

PRZM scenario: ORhopsSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 1067 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 0 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 0 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 0 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.064 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 07-04 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to FL Peppers via ground application

stored as acequFLpeppersIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: FLpeppersSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:38

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w12844.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:22

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 0.7965 0.4555 0.155 0.1165 0.08548 0.02108

1962 0.9524 0.6123 0.3306 0.3029 0.2689 0.1745

1963 2.724 1.741 0.8963 0.618 0.5516 0.3388

1964 2.877 1.984 1.242 1.138 1.044 0.7797

1965 5.873 3.673 2.099 1.432 1.229 0.8839

1966 4.288 3.092 1.796 1.522 1.464 1.168

1967 3.102 2.112 1.352 1.163 1.109 0.9818

1968 5.139 3.681 2.641 1.959 1.787 1.267

1969 5.569 3.64 2.05 1.629 1.543 1.35

1970 4.578 3.011 2.111 1.582 1.519 1.316

1971 6.711 4.46 2.051 1.392 1.253 1.037

1972 7.569 4.822 2.435 2.092 2.066 1.507

1973 3.161 2.292 1.563 1.467 1.429 1.258

1974 5.587 3.98 2.038 1.41 1.329 1.187

1975 4.826 3.102 1.768 1.335 1.199 1.006

1976 7.718 5.502 2.382 1.69 1.57 1.234

1977 8.361 4.993 2.68 2.125 1.861 1.526

1978 7.011 4.92 2.706 1.975 1.823 1.565

1979 10.54 6.278 2.677 2.09 1.876 1.579

1980 4.869 3.299 2.199 1.78 1.67 1.497

1981 6.731 4.23 2.116 1.712 1.719 1.28

1982 11.62 7.107 3.61 2.547 2.645 2.072

1983 7.687 5.354 2.955 2.502 2.313 2.108

1984 12.65 8.892 3.707 2.515 2.289 2.025
27

1985 4.473 3.473 2.497 2.084 2.002 1.73

1986 7.341 4.635 2.331 1.903 1.805 1.613

1987 6.183 4.426 2.265 2.038 1.843 1.566

1988 9.344 5.989 3.101 2.513 2.527 1.756

1989 5.562 3.896 1.938 1.46 1.401 1.244

1990 6.394 4.102 2.268 1.832 1.774 1.268

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 12.65 8.892 3.707 2.547 2.645 2.108

0.0645161290322581 11.62 7.107 3.61 2.515 2.527 2.072

0.0967741935483871 10.54 6.278 3.101 2.513 2.313 2.025

0.129032258064516 9.344 5.989 2.955 2.502 2.289 1.756

0.161290322580645 8.361 5.502 2.706 2.125 2.066 1.73

0.193548387096774 7.718 5.354 2.68 2.092 2.002 1.613

0.225806451612903 7.687 4.993 2.677 2.09 1.876 1.579

0.258064516129032 7.569 4.92 2.641 2.084 1.861 1.566

0.290322580645161 7.341 4.822 2.497 2.038 1.843 1.565

0.32258064516129 7.011 4.635 2.435 1.975 1.823 1.526

0.354838709677419 6.731 4.46 2.382 1.959 1.805 1.507

0.387096774193548 6.711 4.426 2.331 1.903 1.787 1.497

0.419354838709677 6.394 4.23 2.268 1.832 1.774 1.35

0.451612903225806 6.183 4.102 2.265 1.78 1.719 1.316

0.483870967741936 5.873 3.98 2.199 1.712 1.67 1.28

0.516129032258065 5.587 3.896 2.116 1.69 1.57 1.268

0.548387096774194 5.569 3.681 2.111 1.629 1.543 1.267

0.580645161290323 5.562 3.673 2.099 1.582 1.519 1.258

0.612903225806452 5.139 3.64 2.051 1.522 1.464 1.244

0.645161290322581 4.869 3.473 2.05 1.467 1.429 1.234

0.67741935483871 4.826 3.299 2.038 1.46 1.401 1.187

0.709677419354839 4.578 3.102 1.938 1.432 1.329 1.168

0.741935483870968 4.473 3.092 1.796 1.41 1.253 1.037

0.774193548387097 4.288 3.011 1.768 1.392 1.229 1.006

0.806451612903226 3.161 2.292 1.563 1.335 1.199 0.9818

0.838709677419355 3.102 2.112 1.352 1.163 1.109 0.8839

0.870967741935484 2.877 1.984 1.242 1.138 1.044 0.7797

0.903225806451613 2.724 1.741 0.8963 0.618 0.5516 0.3388

0.935483870967742 0.9524 0.6123 0.3306 0.3029 0.2689 0.1745

0.967741935483871 0.7965 0.4555 0.155 0.1165 0.08548 0.02108

0.1 10.4204 6.2491 3.0864 2.5119 2.3106 1.9981

Average of yearly averages: 1.27795933333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequFLpeppersIRgr

Metfile: w12844.dvf

PRZM scenario: FLpeppersSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 1067 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 0 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 0 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 0 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.064 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 15-10 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.
28

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to GA Pecans via air blast application (Method Approach 2)

stored as acyquGApecanIRab.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: GAPecansSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:38

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w93805.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:18

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 0.7622 0.4012 0.1237 0.0861 0.07808 0.03735

1962 1.061 0.5674 0.198 0.1296 0.1183 0.0602

1963 0.9167 0.5137 0.2514 0.1693 0.1602 0.0823

1964 2.616 1.439 0.5505 0.366 0.319 0.1606

1965 6.254 3.403 1.179 0.6728 0.5567 0.2552

1966 2.93 1.595 0.6343 0.3722 0.3311 0.1943

1967 0.8221 0.4634 0.222 0.1667 0.143 0.1049

1968 1.001 0.5568 0.196 0.132 0.1195 0.08104

1969 1.373 0.818 0.3989 0.2361 0.2304 0.1267

1970 2.305 1.281 0.4613 0.2755 0.2479 0.1401

1971 1.013 0.6565 0.2944 0.2302 0.2033 0.1157

1972 6.148 3.278 1.07 0.559 0.4565 0.2034

1973 2.026 1.111 0.4863 0.3175 0.2783 0.1581

1974 0.8282 0.4688 0.2061 0.1702 0.1609 0.1063

1975 1.463 0.9273 0.3679 0.2493 0.2598 0.136

1976 0.8452 0.5073 0.3037 0.2278 0.1945 0.12

1977 0.8232 0.4616 0.2207 0.157 0.1571 0.09354

1978 1.099 0.6155 0.2458 0.1922 0.1701 0.08882

1979 1.088 0.7344 0.3482 0.2233 0.1935 0.1075

1980 1.205 0.7463 0.277 0.1861 0.1705 0.0999

1981 0.801 0.4409 0.1812 0.1323 0.1074 0.0681

1982 6.094 3.311 1.053 0.5694 0.4616 0.1895

1983 0.8984 0.5215 0.3236 0.2161 0.1781 0.1165

1984 1.086 0.6446 0.2323 0.1861 0.1581 0.08407

1985 4.224 2.285 0.7316 0.4079 0.3344 0.1528

1986 3.589 1.956 0.6811 0.4102 0.3541 0.1824

1987 3.489 2.104 0.8553 0.4642 0.3963 0.1959

1988 0.8265 0.466 0.1754 0.1448 0.128 0.09675

1989 3.528 1.944 0.7999 0.4575 0.3717 0.1632

1990 1.769 0.9798 0.3943 0.2326 0.2003 0.1177

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 6.254 3.403 1.179 0.6728 0.5567 0.2552

0.0645161290322581 6.148 3.311 1.07 0.5694 0.4616 0.2034

0.0967741935483871 6.094 3.278 1.053 0.559 0.4565 0.1959

0.129032258064516 4.224 2.285 0.8553 0.4642 0.3963 0.1943

0.161290322580645 3.589 2.104 0.7999 0.4575 0.3717 0.1895

0.193548387096774 3.528 1.956 0.7316 0.4102 0.3541 0.1824

0.225806451612903 3.489 1.944 0.6811 0.4079 0.3344 0.1632

0.258064516129032 2.93 1.595 0.6343 0.3722 0.3311 0.1606

0.290322580645161 2.616 1.439 0.5505 0.366 0.319 0.1581

0.32258064516129 2.305 1.281 0.4863 0.3175 0.2783 0.1528

0.354838709677419 2.026 1.111 0.4613 0.2755 0.2598 0.1401

0.387096774193548 1.769 0.9798 0.3989 0.2493 0.2479 0.136

0.419354838709677 1.463 0.9273 0.3943 0.2361 0.2304 0.1267

0.451612903225806 1.373 0.818 0.3679 0.2326 0.2033 0.12

0.483870967741936 1.205 0.7463 0.3482 0.2302 0.2003 0.1177

0.516129032258065 1.099 0.7344 0.3236 0.2278 0.1945 0.1165

0.548387096774194 1.088 0.6565 0.3037 0.2233 0.1935 0.1157
29

0.580645161290323 1.086 0.6446 0.2944 0.2161 0.1781 0.1075

0.612903225806452 1.061 0.6155 0.277 0.1922 0.1705 0.1063

0.645161290322581 1.013 0.5674 0.2514 0.1861 0.1701 0.1049

0.67741935483871 1.001 0.5568 0.2458 0.1861 0.1609 0.0999

0.709677419354839 0.9167 0.5215 0.2323 0.1702 0.1602 0.09675

0.741935483870968 0.8984 0.5137 0.222 0.1693 0.1581 0.09354

0.774193548387097 0.8452 0.5073 0.2207 0.1667 0.1571 0.08882

0.806451612903226 0.8282 0.4688 0.2061 0.157 0.143 0.08407

0.838709677419355 0.8265 0.466 0.198 0.1448 0.128 0.0823

0.870967741935484 0.8232 0.4634 0.196 0.1323 0.1195 0.08104

0.903225806451613 0.8221 0.4616 0.1812 0.132 0.1183 0.0681

0.935483870967742 0.801 0.4409 0.1754 0.1296 0.1074 0.0602

0.967741935483871 0.7622 0.4012 0.1237 0.0861 0.07808 0.03735

0.1 5.907 3.1787 1.03323 0.54952 0.45048 0.19574

Average of yearly averages: 0.127962333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acyquGApecanIRab

Metfile: w93805.dvf

PRZM scenario: GAPecansSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 970 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0.19 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 97 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 649.8 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 48.5 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 9.6 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.063 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 24-05 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to PA Tomato via ground application (Method Approach 2)

stored as acyquPAtomatoIRgr2.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: PAtomatoSTD.txt modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14751.dvf modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:00

Water segment concentrations (μg/L)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 0.776 0.4144 0.1664 0.1379 0.107 0.0372

1962 4.056 2.218 0.7164 0.5056 0.4655 0.1944

1963 2.835 1.575 0.5928 0.4671 0.3787 0.2474

1964 1.216 0.7084 0.3922 0.3442 0.3108 0.2172

1965 1.194 0.6816 0.3278 0.2323 0.2118 0.1559

1966 4.316 2.344 0.8795 0.4892 0.4403 0.2063
30

1967 2.506 1.4 0.6545 0.4217 0.3457 0.2234

1968 4.295 2.359 0.8745 0.5238 0.47 0.2558

1969 1.304 0.8341 0.4016 0.2767 0.2475 0.1978

1970 2.671 1.479 0.5438 0.3776 0.3141 0.1985

1971 2.307 1.302 0.6095 0.3388 0.2827 0.1946

1972 3.034 1.685 0.8792 0.5069 0.3722 0.223

1973 4.468 2.466 0.9281 0.5786 0.5058 0.2894

1974 3.504 2.297 0.836 0.5346 0.4522 0.294

1975 9.771 6.527 2.312 1.227 0.9986 0.4029

1976 6.677 3.706 1.426 0.8394 0.7443 0.447

1977 1.228 0.7703 0.5215 0.4977 0.4574 0.3436

1978 0.8842 0.5225 0.3584 0.3379 0.3128 0.2147

1979 2.2 1.452 0.7221 0.4996 0.4299 0.2498

1980 4.031 2.21 0.7247 0.5328 0.4082 0.2217

1981 2.638 1.573 0.5853 0.3445 0.2932 0.228

1982 1.645 0.9413 0.3597 0.2628 0.2391 0.1889

1983 2.127 1.21 0.5899 0.4731 0.412 0.2008

1984 1.354 0.7918 0.3451 0.3086 0.2861 0.2162

1985 3.08 1.711 0.6328 0.4014 0.3731 0.2025

1986 1.417 0.8366 0.394 0.3226 0.2526 0.1962

1987 2.426 1.365 0.8803 0.5302 0.5145 0.2666

1988 1.928 1.111 0.4387 0.3427 0.3122 0.2374

1989 4.601 2.983 1.043 0.5885 0.4689 0.2315

1990 3.979 2.216 0.8591 0.5564 0.4654 0.2698

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 9.771 6.527 2.312 1.227 0.9986 0.447

0.0645161290322581 6.677 3.706 1.426 0.8394 0.7443 0.4029

0.0967741935483871 4.601 2.983 1.043 0.5885 0.5145 0.3436

0.129032258064516 4.468 2.466 0.9281 0.5786 0.5058 0.294

0.161290322580645 4.316 2.359 0.8803 0.5564 0.47 0.2894

0.193548387096774 4.295 2.344 0.8795 0.5346 0.4689 0.2698

0.225806451612903 4.056 2.297 0.8792 0.5328 0.4655 0.2666

0.258064516129032 4.031 2.218 0.8745 0.5302 0.4654 0.2558

0.290322580645161 3.979 2.216 0.8591 0.5238 0.4574 0.2498

0.32258064516129 3.504 2.21 0.836 0.5069 0.4522 0.2474

0.354838709677419 3.08 1.711 0.7247 0.5056 0.4403 0.2374

0.387096774193548 3.034 1.685 0.7221 0.4996 0.4299 0.2315

0.419354838709677 2.835 1.575 0.7164 0.4977 0.412 0.228

0.451612903225806 2.671 1.573 0.6545 0.4892 0.4082 0.2234

0.483870967741936 2.638 1.479 0.6328 0.4731 0.3787 0.223

0.516129032258065 2.506 1.452 0.6095 0.4671 0.3731 0.2217

0.548387096774194 2.426 1.4 0.5928 0.4217 0.3722 0.2172

0.580645161290323 2.307 1.365 0.5899 0.4014 0.3457 0.2162

0.612903225806452 2.2 1.302 0.5853 0.3776 0.3141 0.2147

0.645161290322581 2.127 1.21 0.5438 0.3445 0.3128 0.2063

0.67741935483871 1.928 1.111 0.5215 0.3442 0.3122 0.2025

0.709677419354839 1.645 0.9413 0.4387 0.3427 0.3108 0.2008

0.741935483870968 1.417 0.8366 0.4016 0.3388 0.2932 0.1985

0.774193548387097 1.354 0.8341 0.394 0.3379 0.2861 0.1978

0.806451612903226 1.304 0.7918 0.3922 0.3226 0.2827 0.1962

0.838709677419355 1.228 0.7703 0.3597 0.3086 0.2526 0.1946

0.870967741935484 1.216 0.7084 0.3584 0.2767 0.2475 0.1944

0.903225806451613 1.194 0.6816 0.3451 0.2628 0.2391 0.1889

0.935483870967742 0.8842 0.5225 0.3278 0.2323 0.2118 0.1559

0.967741935483871 0.776 0.4144 0.1664 0.1379 0.107 0.0372

0.1 4.5877 2.9313 1.03151 0.58751 0.51363 0.33864

Average of yearly averages: 0.235083333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acyquPAtomatoIRgr2

Metfile: w14751.dvf

PRZM scenario: PAtomatoSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: acequinocyl

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments
31

Molecular weight mwt 384.5 g/mol

Henry's Law Const. henry 3.9e-5 atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 1.268e-6 torr

Solubility sol 0.067 mg/L

Kd Kd 970 mg/L

Koc Koc mg/L

Photolysis half-life kdp 0.19 days Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 97 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 649.8 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 48.5 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 9.6 days Half-life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP .336 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.99 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.064 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 01-09 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1 interval 21 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1 apprate 0.336 kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND 3

UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of entire run)
32

APPENDIX III

Acequinocyl Data Requirements

Table 3.1: Environmental Fate and Transport Data Submitted for Acequinocyl

Guideline # Laboratory and Field Studies MRID #’s Study 

Classification

161-1 Hydrolysis (dark; pH 5, 7, and 9) 45434908 Supplemental

161-2 Photodegradation in Water (pH 7) 45434909 Supplemental

161-3 Photodegradation on Soil 45434910 Supplemental

162-1 Aerobic Soil Metabolism

Aerobic Soil Metabolism

45434911

45434912

Supplemental

Unacceptable

162-3 Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism 45434913 Supplemental

162-4 Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism 45434914 Supplemental

163-1 Adsorption/Desorption (Technical)

Adsorption/Desorption (Metabolite, R1)

Leaching in Unaged and Aged Soil Columns

45531902

45434907

45531903

Supplemental

Supplemental

Supplemental

164-1 Terrestrial Field Dissipation 45651601 Acceptable

165-4 Accumulation in Fish 45434923 Supplemental