alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carl James PIAZZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-708.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 13, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 11.   Statement re computation of per share earnings

The reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per common share computations for the years ended December 31 are as
follows: (in thousands, except per share data)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                       2005                          2004                        2003
                                      ------------------------------------ -------------------------- ---------------------------
                                                     Weighted      Per              Weighted   Per              Weighted   Per
                                                     Average      Share             Average   Share             Average   Share
                                         Income       Shares     Amount    Income    Shares   Amount   Income    Shares  Amount
                                      ------------- ----------- ---------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------- --------
<S>                                   <C>           <C>         <C>        <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>
Basic Earnings per Common Share
Net income available to common
   shareholders                            $19,705      19,418      $1.01  $18,214    19,124    $0.95  $16,366    17,724   $0.92
                                                                =========                    ========                    =======

Effect of Dilutive Shares
Weighted average shares if converted                       417                           352                         263
                                                    ----------                      --------                    --------

Diluted Earnings per Common Share
Net income available to common
   shareholders                            $19,705      19,835      $0.99  $18,214    19,476    $0.94  $16,366    17,987   $0.91
                                      ============  ==========  =========  =======  ========  =======  =======  ========  ======
</Table>

All per share data and average shares were restated to reflect a 3-for-2 stock
split declared on January 18, 2005 and paid on February 18, 2005.

At December 31, 2004 257,100 stock options were excluded from the calculation of
earnings per common share as they were antidilutive. There were no shares that
were antidilutive at December 31, 2005 and 2003.
259 La. 880

#### Mabel Agnes Domingue LEBLANC et al. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al., Tri-State Insurance Company, Intervenor.

No. 51738.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 18, 1971.

In re: Tri-State Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 251 So.2d 81.

Application denied. The case having been remanded, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is not final.
#### SUCCESSION of George DARBY v. Monroe GALLOWAY.

No. 53561.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1973.

In re: Monroe Galloway applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 275 So.2d 839.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of SFG Financial Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-KS for the year ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Caska,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SFG Financial Corporation and will be retained by SFG Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 February
13, 2009
 By:
      /s/  Michael
      Caska
                    Michael
      Caska
                    President
      and Chief Executive
                    Officer
      (Principal Executive
                    Officer
      and Principal Accounting
                    Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                          880,000
<SECURITIES>                                 21,931,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 4,119,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (71,000)
<INVENTORY>                                   4,464,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             32,169,000
<PP&E>                                       13,268,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (7,282,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               39,890,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        15,510,000
<BONDS>                                       3,231,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   21,119,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 39,890,000
<SALES>                                      25,362,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             25,362,000
<CGS>                                        16,193,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                16,193,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              8,490,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,063,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,649,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    271,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           1,378,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,378,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .56





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Perry Law, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,

not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant

and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known

to us by others within those entities, particularly during the

period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about

the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of

the end of the period covered by this report based on such

evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the

registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth

quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design

or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Perry Law

---------------------------

Perry Law

Chief Executive Officer



May 18, 2007
PROMISSORY NOTE



From:  Global Tech International, Inc.



To:    TICO



Date:  July 30, 2009



Amount: $ 500.00





One hundred eighty days after date, Global Tech International, Inc promises to pay to the order of TICO Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($500.00) at 8% interest rate per annum.  This note is secured by Global Tech International, Inc. present and future goods, including (but not limited to) equipment and inventory, and all of debtor's present and future intangible collateral, including (but not limited to) pure intangibles, i.e. accounts and general intangibles, and semi-intangibles, i.e. documents, instruments, and chattel paper.

Global Tech International, Inc.





By: ______________________________________

Majlinda Xhuti, CFO







Due Date: January 30,
2010







GTINto Tico.doc
House Calendar No. 126

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 316

[Report No. 103–384]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 51) to

Columbia into the Union.provide for the admission of the State of New

NOVEMBER 19, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 126

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 316

[Report No. 103–384]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 51) to provide for the admission

of the State of New Columbia into the Union.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 19, 1993

Mr. MOAKLEY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 51) to provide

for the admission of the State of New Columbia into

the Union.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 51) to provide for the admission

6 of the State of New Columbia into the Union. The first

7 reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate
2

HRES 316 RH

1 shall be confined to the bill and the amendment made in

2 order by this resolution and shall not exceed three hours

3 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank4 ing minority member of the Committee on the District of

5 Columbia. After general debate the bill shall be considered

6 for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in

7 order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

8 amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in

9 the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee

10 on the District of Columbia now printed in the bill, modi11 fied by the amendment printed in part 1 of the report of

12 the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution.

13 The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute,

14 as modified, shall be considered as read. All points of

15 order against the committee amendment in the nature of

16 a substitute, as modified, are waived. No amendment to

17 the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute,

18 as modified, and no other amendment to the bill shall be

19 in order. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

20 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

21 to the House with such amendment as may have been

22 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or23 dered on the bill and any amendment thereto to final pas24 sage without intervening motion except one motion to re25 commit with or without instructions.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2





                             PAGEMART WIRELESS, INC.
                    Computation of per Share Earnings (loss)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
                                                        ----------------------------------------------
                                                             NUMBER          PERCENT      EQUIVALENT
                                                            OF SHARES      OUTSTANDING      SHARES
                                                            ---------      -----------      ------
<S>                                                     <C>                <C>          <C>      
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                      2,300,000       100.00%        2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                     828,571        94.10%          779,658
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                15,310,943       100.00%       15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                              11,242,857       100.00%       11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                               4,323,874       100.00%        4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                                6,000,000       100.00%        6,000,000
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                   75,891       100.00%           75,891
   1997 Warrants Exercised                                      48,300       100.00%           48,300
                                                        ---------------                --------------
                                                            40,130,436                     40,081,523

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                        40,081,523

LOSS BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS                                                         $  (9,981,000)
EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS                                                                     $ (13,808,000)
                                                                                       --------------
NET LOSS                                                                                $ (23,789,000)
                                                                                       ==============


LOSS BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS                                                         $       (0.25)
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM                                                                      $       (0.34)
                                                                                       --------------
NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                      $       (0.59)
                                                                                       ==============
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Donald Gee, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,

not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant

and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known

to us by others within those entities, particularly during the

period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about

the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of

the end of the period covered by this report based on such

evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the

registrant's most recent fiscal that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design

or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Donald Gee

---------------------------

Donald Gee

Chief Executive Officer



February 16, 2006
#### Samuel TARAVELLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-583.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 4, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1972.

Michael Clein, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joseph R. DeLucca, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Simpson v. State, Fla. App.1968, 211 So.2d 862; Reis v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 666.
# C_2020262EN.01002701.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/27

---

Action brought on 26 March 2020 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament

(Case T-188/20)

(2020/C 262/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: SA Close (Harzé-Aywaille, Belgium) and Cegelec (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. Rikkers and J. Teheux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | provisionally order the European Union, represented by the European Parliament, to pay compensation estimated at EUR 3 906 043 plus interest at the statutory rate from the date on which the damage arose, namely 27 March 2015; |
| --- | --- |

—

provisionally order the European Union, represented by the European Parliament, to pay compensation estimated at EUR 3 906 043 plus interest at the statutory rate from the date on which the damage arose, namely 27 March 2015;

| — | before ruling on the action, the applicants seek a stay of proceedings pending the judgment of the Court of Justice in the proceedings currently pending in Case C-447/19 and, if appropriate, of the General Court in the event of a referral; |
| --- | --- |

—

before ruling on the action, the applicants seek a stay of proceedings pending the judgment of the Court of Justice in the proceedings currently pending in Case C-447/19 and, if appropriate, of the General Court in the event of a referral;

| — | reserve ruling on the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve ruling on the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants claim that, if the appeal seeking to have set aside the judgment of 9 April 2019 (Case C-447/19, Close and Cegelec v Parliament) were upheld, it would have to entail the annulment of the decision taken on 19 March 2015 by the Parliament to award the public works contract concerning the ‘Project for the extension and refurbishment of the Konrad Adenauer Building in Luxembourg’, lot 73 (power station), reference INLO-D-UPIL-T-14-AO4, to the Association Momentanée ENERGIE-KAD (composed of the companies MERSCH and SCHMITZ PRODUCTION SARL and ENERGOLUX S. A) and, correlatively, not to have chosen the applicants’ tender, it follows that, firstly, the Association Momentanée ENERGIE-KAD could not be selected and that, secondly, the applicants, having submitted the lowest tender, should have been awarded the contract, the award of the contract being based solely on the criterion of price. The damage suffered is provisionally assessed at 10 % of the amount of their tender.

---
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Robert R. Galvin,  Chief  Financial  Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended  September 30,
2004 of the Company (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                         /s/ Robert R. Galvin
                                         --------------------
                                         Robert R. Galvin
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         November 9, 2004
```