alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                    GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                          Six months ended July 1, 2000

                                  (Unauditied)


(In millions)


Earnings:
   Earnings before income taxes                                    $377
   Fixed charges:
     Minority interest in net earnings of
         consolidated subsidiaries (1)                               44
     Interest expense (2)                                            63
                                                                   ----
                                                                   $484
                                                                   ====

Fixed charges:
   Minority interest in net earnings of
      consolidated subsidiaries (3)                                $ 55
   Interest expense (2)                                              63
                                                                   ====
                                                                   $118
                                                                   ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                 4.10
                                                                   ====


(1)  Minority  interest in net earnings of  consolidated  subsidiaries  includes
     earnings from purchased affiliates and dividends on subsidiary's  preferred
     stock.

(2)  Interest  expense  includes an amount for one-third of the rental  expense,
     which the Company  believes is a reasonable  approximation  of the interest
     factor for such rentals.

(3)  The  fixed  charges  amount  for  minority  interest  in  net  earnings  of
     consolidated  subsidiaries  represents  the pre-tax  earnings  amount which
     would be required to cover such fixed charges as calculated below:

                     Earnings From Purchased Affiliates or
               Subsidiary's Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
               -------------------------------------------------
                             100% - Income Tax Rate

     The  income  tax rate is based on the  relationship  of the  provision  for
     income taxes to earnings before income taxes for the respective period.


                                        8
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
GlycoGenesys, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



|(1) |  | the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2003



|                                                  | 
|------------------------------------------------- | 
|By: /s/ John W. Burns                             | 
|Name: John W. Burns Title: SVP, CFO and
Secretary | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to GlycoGenesys, Inc. and will be retained by GlycoGenesys, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D18-4516 

_____________________________ 

R.C.O., a child, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Suzanne Bass, Judge. 

August 5, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Kasey Helms Lacey, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon Traxler, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Earl T. LANE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 53191.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Mar. 1, 1973.

In re: Earl T. Lane applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. Since the trial judge has reported that no habeas corpus petition by relator has been received by his court and that relator’s appeal is now pending, this application is denied.

DIXON, J., concurs in the denial; applicant must again file his application in the district court.
#### Henry J. REDD and Cecil Rosenblum, Appellants v. The POLK COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and National Medical Properties, Inc., a foreign corporation authorized to do business in Florida, Appellees.

No. 71-241.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 27, 1972.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1972.

J. M. McCarthy, of Harden & DeVane and David J. Williams, Lakeland, for appellants.

J. Hardin Peterson, Jr., of Peterson, Carr & Harris, P. A., Lakeland, for appel-lee National Medical Properties, Inc.

John Dewell, Bartow, for appellee Polk County Board of Adjustment.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the record herein and studied the merits of the points raised on appeal as argued in appellants’ *322brief, and have heretofore determined that oral argument be dispensed with.

We determine that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial qourt erred as a matter of law and that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1223

To extend the existing suspension of duty on power-driven weaving machines

for weaving fabrics more than 4.9 meters in width.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. BREAUX (for himself and Mr. HOLLINGS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To extend the existing suspension of duty on power-driven

weaving machines for weaving fabrics more than 4.9

meters in width.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON POWER-DRIVEN WEAVING MA5 CHINES FOR WEAVING FABRICS MORE THAN

6 4.9 METERS.

7 Heading 9902.84.46 of the Harmonized Tariff

8 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

9 31/90’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’.
2

•S 1223 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 shall apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn

4 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

6 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec7 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

8 of law, upon a request filed with the appropriate customs

9 officer on or before the 180th day after the date of the

10 enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from

11 warehouse for consumption, of goods described in heading

12 9902.84.46 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

13 United States that was made—

14 (1) after December 31, 1990; and

15 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en16 actment of this Act;

17 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

18 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

19 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

20 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

21 occurred on the date that is 15 days after the date of the

22 enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1077 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1077

 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
reauthorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2013

  Mr. Cardin (for himself, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Carper, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
  Coons, and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
reauthorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 
Watertrails Network Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 502(c) of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 (16 
U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 105-312) is amended by striking ``fiscal 
years'' and all that follows through the period at the end and 
inserting ``fiscal years 2014 through 2018.''.
                                 <all>
```
Matthew Rodriquez Secretary for Environmental Protection March 11 , 2016 Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator 

# Air Resources Board Mary D. Nichols, Chair 1001 I Street • P .O . Box 2815 Sacramento , California 95812 • www. arb .ca .gov

U . S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco , California 94105 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld : Edmund G . Brown Jr. Gov ernor

Enclosed are revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions consist of amended rules , listed in Enclosure A , from the following air pollution control and air quality management d istricts (districts) . Butte County Air Quality Management District Placer County Air Pollution Control District Sacramento Metropolitan Air Qual ity Management District Ventura County Air Pollution Control District Also enclosed is Air Resources Board Executive Order S- 16-001 adopting the districts ' rules as revisions to the SIP . To meet the U . S . Environmental Protection Agency criteria for determining that rule submittals are administrative ly and techn ically complete , we have enclosed evaluations of the effects of the rules on emissions , evaluations of the rules ' consistency with 40 CFR 51, and other supporting documentation provided to us by the districts . One compact disc and one paper copy, each contain ing the revisions in t heir entirety, are enclosed . · If you have any questions , please have your staff contact Ms. Karen Magliano , Chief, Air Quality Planning and Science Division , at (916) 322-5350 or by email at Karen . Magliano@arb
. ca.gov . Sincerelv .



# I'L .v. 

# f£/" R ichard W . Corey Executive Officer Enclosures cc : See next page .

The energy challenge faci ng Cali fornia is rea l . Every Californian needs to take i mmediate action t o reduce energy consumption. F

or a fi s t ofsimple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy cost s, see our website: http :// www. arb . ca .gov . Californ ia Environmental Protec t ion Agency Printed on Recycled PaperMr. Jared Blumenfeld March 11 , 2016 Page 2
cc : Mr. James Wagoner Air Pollution Control Officer Butte County Air Quality

Management District 629 Entler Avenue , Suite 15 Chico, California 95928 Mr. Erik White Air Pollution Control Officer Placer County Air Pollution Control District 11 0 Maple Street Auburn, California 95630 Mr. Larry Green Air Pollution Control Officer Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality

**Mana~ement** District 777 121 Street , Third Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Mr. Michael Villegas Air Pollution Control Officer Ventura County Air Pollution Control District 669 County Square Drive Ventura , California 93003 Mr. Alan Abbs Executive Director California Air Pollution Control

Officers Association 1107 Ninth Street, Suite 210 Sacramento, California 95814 Mr. Andy Steckel, Chief Rulemaking Office (Air-4), Region 9 U . S . Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco , California 95105 Ms . Karen Magliano , Chief Air Quality Planning and Science Division
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2


                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-61587, 33-61589, and 33-64149 of Habersham Bancorp on Forms S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-18023 of Habersham Bancorp on Form S-3 of our
report dated January 17, 1997, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Habersham Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 1998.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 26, 1999
252 La. 114

#### Dorothy Givens JENKINS v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 49192.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1968.

In re: Doris Washington applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 207 So.2d 255.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit 10.12


 



MARCH
1, 2021


 


ROB
PARIS

AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDED AGREEMENT, WHICH IS EFFECTIVE ON MARCH 1, 2021, IS MADE BETWEEN RIVULET FILMS INC, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND ROB PARIS
OF PARIS FILMS INC. THE FOLLOWING AMENDED TERMS ARE INCLUDED & APPLY:


 


		●	ROB
PARIS MONTHLY SALARY INCREASES TO $15,000/MONTHLY



 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE CAUSED THIS AGREEMENT TO BE DULY EXECUTED AND DELIVERED AS OF THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE
WRITTEN.


 


	/s/
    Mike Witherill	 
	MIKE
    WITHERILL	 
	RIVULET
    FILMS INC.	 
	 	 
	/s/
    Rob Paris	 
	ROB
    PARIS	 
	PARIS
    FILMS INC.
<PAGE>
 
                                                            EXHIBIT 23.2



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
  our reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
  Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 33-37913, 33-41664, 33-41665,
  33-41783, 33-65754, 33-71010, 33-71008, 33-86368, 33-86370, 33-86372, 333-
  03429, and 333-03427. It should be noted that we have not audited any
  financial statements of the Company subsequent to June 30, 1996, or performed
  any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.



                                 /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


  Dallas, Texas
  September 15, 1997
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK NEAL MAYE, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 254 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# C_2022051EN.01003102.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 December 2021 — Union Syndicale Solidaires des SDIS de France et DOM/TOM v Commission

(Case T-152/21) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Filing of a complaint with the Commission concerning the application of EU law - Time limit for reply - Right to good administration - Mandatory due diligence - Reasonable period - No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

(2022/C 51/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Union Syndicale Solidaires des services départementaux d’incendie et de secours (SDIS) de France et DOM/TOM (Nîmes, France) (represented by: O. Coudray, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm suffered by the applicant as a result of the Commission’s negligent failure to deal with her complaint, registered on 27 June 2019 under reference CHAP(2019)01840, for alleged breach of European Union law by the French Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Union Syndicale Solidaires des services départementaux d’incendie et de secours (SDIS) de France et DOM/TOM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Union Syndicale Solidaires des services départementaux d’incendie et de secours (SDIS) de France et DOM/TOM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.

---
Exhibit 13

Certification

OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Océ N.V. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), R.L. van Iperen, as Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors of the Company, and J. van den Belt, as Chief Financial
Officer and member of the Board of Executive Officers of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 7, 2006



/s/ R.L. van IperenName:

R.L. van IperenTitle:

Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ J. van den BeltName:

J. van den BeltTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and member of the Board of Executive Directors(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### George Boyce ROBINSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50329.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 29, 1978.

Caldwell, Lee, Richardson, Vance & Medley, L. Joe Lee, Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Catherine W. Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Russel D. Moore, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM, BOWLING and COFER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.4


                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
                                                                                --------------------------------------------
                                                                                  NUMBER          PERCENT        EQUIVALENT
                                                                                 OF SHARES      OUTSTANDING        SHARES
                                                                                 ---------      -----------      ----------
<S>                                                                            <C>               <C>             <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                                           2,300,000         100.00%         2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                                        2,488,572          99.43%         2,474,476
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                                     15,310,943         100.00%        15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                                                   11,242,857         100.00%        11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                                                    4,323,874         100.00%         4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                                                     6,000,000         100.00%         6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                                                   (6,588)        100.00%            (6,588)
   March 2000 Debt Swap                                                           3,789,715         100.00%         3,789,715
   Canadian Transaction                                                             714,286         100.00%           714,286
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                                       169,504          93.06%           157,734
   Warrants Exercised                                                               134,737          98.90%           133,256
                                                                                -----------                       -----------
                                                                                 46,467,900                        46,440,553

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                                46,440,553

NET LOSS                                                                                                          (30,985,000)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                                                     ($0.67)
                                                                                                                  ===========
</Table>