alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8

Changes in subsidiaries of Océ N.V. since the listing thereof in Océ Form 20-F for its fiscal year ended November 30, 2005



|                             |  |                                               |  |                                                                                     
|---------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |  | Notes                                                                               
|CaseData Inc.                |  | United States                                 |  | Acquired November 9, 2006 and merged into Océ Business Services, Inc. December 2006.
|                             |  |                                              
|X Engineering Systems XES Oy |  | Finland                                       |  | Activities acquired and incorporated in Océ Finland Oy October 2, 2006
Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, and in connection with the quarterly report on
Form 10-QSB of Volunteer  Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  Greg Oliver,  the Vice President and
Cashier of the Company, hereby certifies that (1) the Report fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, and (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     This Certification is signed on May 12, 2003.




                             /s/ Greg Oliver
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                                 Greg Oliver
                                 Vice President and Cashier
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-29-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           13,466
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     2,299
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 16,730
<CASH>                                         123
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             2,432
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,350
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                14,024
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            1,229
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          1,142
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    150
<COMMON>                                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,350
<PREMIUMS>                                     1,344
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            224
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             88
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 13
<BENEFITS>                                     1,055
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    248
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                226
<INCOME-TAX>                                   68
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            158
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022398EN.01002401.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/24

---

Order of the General Court of 2 August 2022 — Kakuzo v EUIPO — Rauch Fruchtsäfte (Kakuzo)

(Case T-592/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 398/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Kakuzo GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and D. Mienert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: I. Harrington and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Rauch Fruchtsäfte GmbH (Rankweil, Austria)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 July 2021 (Case R 356/2021-5)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Kakuzo GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Kakuzo GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     6,949
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             23,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                               21,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         107,824
<PP&E>                                    29,935
<DEPRECIATION>                             5,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           142,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    135,041
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      25
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                 4,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             142,817
<SALES>                                   25,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          25,219
<CGS>                                     25,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             25,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           2,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (3,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (2,506)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2,506)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.10)
        


</TABLE>
#### William P. GILL v. Jerry W. TRAVIS et al.

No. 53435.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1973.

In re: Jerry W. Travis, Dairy Farmers Trucking Association, Inc. and Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 273 So.2d 699.

Writ denied on the facts found by the Court of Appeal. We find no error of law in its judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) the
Company's financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
-10KSB for te year ended September 30, 1996.  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)  financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       187,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   (187,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (62,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (62,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (62,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021368EN.01000601.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/6

---

Appeal brought on 24 February 2021 by Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-665/19, Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO

(Case C-114/21 P)

(2021/C 368/03)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Appellant: Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska, radca prawny, K. Gajek, adwokat, and M. Żuk, radca prawny)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 22 June 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed.

---
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Robert R. Galvin,  Chief  Financial  Officer of NuCo2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                   /s/ Robert R. Galvin
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Robert R. Galvin
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   May 15, 2003
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00453-CV

Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas and Travis County, Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 

NO. D-1-GN-16-000370, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The stay issued in this case on March 6, 2020, is lifted.

It is ordered on January 14, 2021.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1093 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1093

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 130 Caldwell Drive in Hazlehurst, Mississippi, as the ``First 
     Lieutenant Alvin Chester Cockrell, Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2013

  Mr. Cochran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 130 Caldwell Drive in Hazlehurst, Mississippi, as the ``First 
     Lieutenant Alvin Chester Cockrell, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT ALVIN CHESTER COCKRELL, JR. POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 130 Caldwell Drive in Hazlehurst, Mississippi, shall be 
known and designated as the ``First Lieutenant Alvin Chester Cockrell, 
Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Lieutenant Alvin Chester Cockrell, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed October 13, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00445-CV

____________

KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER, Appellant

V.

THE KROGER CO., ANN POTTER and MELINDA COOMBS Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-45365

O R D E R

No record has been filed in this appeal. According to information provided to this 

court, this is an appeal from a judgment signed May 6, 2011. Appellant filed his notice of 

appeal on May 18, 2011. Appellant also filed an affidavit of indigence. On May 23, 

2011, the Harris County District Clerk filed a contest to appellant’s affidavit of inability to 

pay costs. Our records do not indicate that the official court reporter, Amanda King, filed 

a contest. This court has been advised that to date, there has been no order signed on the 

District Clerk’s contest.
2

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 governs the procedure to be followed when 

a party seeks to appeal without the advance payment of costs. Rule 20.1(i) provides that 

the trial court must either conduct a hearing or sign an order extending the time to conduct 

a hearing within 10 days after the contest was filed. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i)(2). The time 

for conducted a hearing must not be extended for more than 20 days from the date the order 

extending the hearing is signed. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i)(3). If the trial court has not 

signed an order sustaining the contest within the period set for the hearing, the affidavit’s 

allegations will be deemed true, and the party will be allowed to proceed without advance 

payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i)(4). 

In this case, the contest to appellant’s affidavit was filed more than four months ago. 

The time period to conduct a hearing and sign an order sustaining the contest has long 

passed. Accordingly, we issue the following order:

The allegations in appellant’s affidavit of indigence are deemed true and appellant is 

allowed to proceed without the advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i)(4). 

The Harris County District Clerk is ordered to file a clerk=s record in this appeal on or 

before November 14, 2011. The official court reporter, Amanda King, is ordered to file 

a reporter=s record in this appeal on or before November 14, 2011. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-09507, 333-85693, 333-50246, and 333-83686 of ION Networks, Inc. and
subsidiaries on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-61837, 333-14681,
333-76809, 333-76604, and 333-76568 of ION Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries on
Form S-8, of our report dated June 21, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of ION Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31,
2002.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
July 1, 2002
Exhibit 32

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Section 1350

In connection with the Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford D. Nastas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 19, 2006

By:

/S/    CLIFFORD D. NASTASClifford D. NastasChief Executive Officer and Director


In connection with the Report, I, Jeffrey J. Siemers, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative
and Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 19, 2006

By:

/s/    JEFFREY J. SIEMERSJeffrey J. SiemersExecutive Vice President, Chief Administrativeand Financial Officer and Secretary




1
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**ChiefExecutive Officer**

 

I, Lori A. Jones, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSBof Analytical Surveys, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and the registrant’s have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) [reserved]

 

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this annualreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: December 27, 2005 |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ Lori A. Jones            |   |
|                         | Lori A. Jones |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer |
|                              |  |  |

 

1

----