alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before September 21, 2018.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division (“Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on May 31, 2018, Johnson Matthey Inc., 2003 Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 08066-1742 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class of controlled substance: Controlled 
                             substance
Drug code
ScheduleOpium tincture
9630
II
 The company plans to manufacture the above-listed controlled substance in bulk for distribution to its customers. Dated: July 12, 2018. John J. Martin, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-15664 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Calendar No. 421

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 116

A BILL

For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles.

MAY 5 (legislative day, MAY 2), 1994

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 421

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 116

For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 5 (legislative day, MAY 2), 1994

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment

A BILL

For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding any provision of the Immigration

4 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Fanie Phily

5 Mateo Angeles shall be held and considered to have been

6 lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent resi7 dence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon

8 payment of the required visa fee. Upon the granting of

9 permanent residence to such alien as provided for in this
2

•S 116 RS

1 Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer

2 to reduce by the proper number, during the current fiscal

3 year or the fiscal year next following, the total number

4 of immigrant visas which are made available to natives

5 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a)

6 of such Act, or if applicable, the total number of immi7 grant visas which are made available to natives of the

8 country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such

9 Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1058 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1058

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize per diem payments 
 under comprehensive service programs for homeless veterans to furnish 
    care to dependents of homeless veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2013

Mr. Heller (for himself and Mrs. Murray) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize per diem payments 
 under comprehensive service programs for homeless veterans to furnish 
    care to dependents of homeless veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Creating a Reliable Environment for 
Veterans' Dependents Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PER DIEM PAYMENTS FOR FURNISHING CARE TO 
              DEPENDENTS OF CERTAIN HOMELESS VETERANS.

    Section 2012(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(4) Services for which a recipient of a grant under section 2011 
of this title (or an entity described in paragraph (1)) may receive per 
diem payments under this subsection may include furnishing care for a 
dependent of a homeless veteran who is under the care of such homeless 
veteran while such homeless veteran receives services from the grant 
recipient (or entity).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mary Jane KELLEY, Appellant, v. John S. KELLEY, Jr., Appellee.

No. 71-774.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 24, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2022198EN.01004901.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/49

---

Order of the General Court of 15 March 2022 — Growth Finance Plus v EUIPO (catlover)

(Case T-115/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 198/71)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Growth Finance Plus AG (Gommiswald, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Twelmeier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 November 2020 (Case R 717/2020-1), relating to an application for registration of the word sign catlover as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,400
<SECURITIES>                                       188
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,579
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,113
<PP&E>                                          15,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,634
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,040)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,703
<SALES>                                          7,379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,843
<CGS>                                            1,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,438)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 324 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 324

    The committee to notify the President of completion of business.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 23, 1993

 Mr. Gephardt submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    The committee to notify the President of completion of business.

    Resolved, That a committee of two Members of the House be appointed 
to wait upon the President of the United States and inform him that the 
House of Representatives has completed its business of the session and 
is ready to adjourn, unless the President has some other communication 
to make to them.

                                 <all>
```
#### Fred O. DICKINSON, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY etc., Appellee. Fred O. DICKINSON, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. AGRICO CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Division of Continental Oil Company, a Delaware corporation, Appellee. Fred O. DICKINSON, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. MOBIL OIL COMPANY, a New York Corporation, Appellee.

Nos. Q-136 to Q-138, Q-157 to Q-159.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 9, 1972.

Larry Levy, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Preston O. Cockey, Jr., of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for appellees.

PER' CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order and judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See State ex rel. Drum Service Co. of Florida v. Kirk, 234 So.2d 358 (Fla.1970).

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., arid JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Pew, Appellant.

[656 NYS2d 1009]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]), defendant contends that the evidence is legally *931insufficient to establish that he acted with the intent to cause serious physical injury and that his conduct caused the death of the victim. We disagree. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), is sufficient to establish that defendant intended to cause serious physical injury and that his conduct set in motion the events that ultimately resulted in the victim’s death *(see, People v*Steinberg, 79 NY2d 673, 681-683; *People v Kibbe,*35 NY2d 407; *People v Novak,*179 AD2d 1053, *lv denied*79 NY2d 922).

We further conclude that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant did not violate defendant’s attorney-client privilege or deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.— Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Law-ton, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41745 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALBERTO CARDOZA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-616

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Alberto Cardoza-Rodriguez (Cardoza) appeals his guilty plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegally reentering the United States after having been previously deported. Cardoza challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). Cardoza’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Cardoza contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overruleNo. 05-41745 -2- Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Cardoza properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Cardoza argues that the district court erred by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct appeal. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu , 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). The claim is dismissed. See id. at 1102. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lucid, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L. Michael Hone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
March 30, 2012

/s/ L. MICHAEL HONE L. Michael Hone Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 92 

Encouraging people in the United States to recognize March 1, 2013, as 

Read Across America Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2013 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois (for himself and Mrs. DAVIS of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging people in the United States to recognize March 

1, 2013, as Read Across America Day. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success, and is a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading 

intervention and providing additional resources for reading assistance, including through the programs authorized in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

1965 and programs such as Early Reading First, ImVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:03 Mar 01, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR92.IH HR92

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 92 IH 

proving Literacy through School Libraries, and Striving 

Readers; and 

Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned 

about reading and education have joined with the National Education Association (NEA) to use March 1 to 

celebrate reading and the birth of Theodor Geisel, also 

known as Dr. Seuss: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. 

3 Seuss, for his success in encouraging children to dis4 cover the joy of reading; 

5 (2) honors the 15th anniversary of Read Across 

6 America Day; 

7 (3) encourages parents to read with their chil8 dren for at least 30 minutes on Read Across Amer9 ica Day in honor of the commitment of the House 

10 of Representatives to building a Nation of readers; 

11 and 

12 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

13 to observe Read Across America Day with appro14 priate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### JUBAN PROPERTIES, INC. v. Robert G. CLAITOR.

No. 12263.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 16, 1978.

Martin C. Schroeder, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-relator.

E. Drew McKinnis, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before PONDER and LOTTINGER, JJ.

Defendant in a Petition for Writs of Cer-tiorari, Prohibition and Stay Order seeks “a rule or order directed to Juban Properties, Inc. and the Honorable Melvin A. Shortess, issuing a stay order pending application for certiorari by Robert G. Claitor to the United States Supreme Court; further in connection with this stay order, an order mandating Juban Properties, Inc. to remove the fence constructed on the easterly fifteen (15) feet of its property . . . ”.

This court rendered judgment for plaintiff on December 28, 1977, 354 So.2d 672. An application for rehearing was denied on February 13, 1978, La., 356 So.2d 440. The Supreme Court of Louisiana on March 27, 1978 unanimously denied an application for writ of review.

Applicant is asking this court to stay a final and executory judgment and in conjunction therewith to issue a mandatory injunction to a party who is acting under a final judgment.

We find it inappropriate to do so.

Application for stay order and mandatory injunction denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21
                       SUBSIDIARIES OF ROTO-ROOTER, INC.

                 The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of
December 31, 1995.  Each of the companies is incorporated under the laws of the
jurisdiction under which it is listed and, in the case of each United States
company, under the laws of the state following its name.  The percentage given
for each company represents the percentage of voting securities of such company
owned by the Company or, where indicated, subsidiaries of the Company as at
December 31, 1995.

                 All of the companies listed below are included in the
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 1995.


Amira Services, Inc. (Florida, 100% by Service America Systems, Inc.)

Encore Service Systems, Inc. (Florida, 100% by Service America Systems, Inc.)

Nurotoco of Massachusetts, Inc. (Massachusetts, 100% by Roto-Rooter Services
  Company)

Nurotoco of New Jersey, Inc. (Delaware, 80% by Roto-Rooter Services Company)

OnCall Craftsmen, Inc. (Ohio, 100% by Roto-Rooter Services Company)

Roto-Rooter Canada, Ltd. (British Columbia, 100% by Roto-Rooter Services
  Company)

Roto-Rooter Corporation (Iowa, 100% by Roto-Rooter, Inc.)

Roto-Rooter Development Company (Delaware, 100% by Roto-Rooter Corporation)

Roto-Rooter Management Company (Delaware, 100% by Roto-Rooter, Inc.)

Roto-Rooter Services Company (Iowa, 100% by Roto-Rooter, Inc.)

RR Plumbing Services Corporation (New York, 49% by Roto-Rooter Services
  Company)

Service America Systems, Inc. (Florida, 70% by Roto-Rooter, Inc. and 30% by
  Chemed)
Dismissal and Opinion Filed July 1, 2013 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-12-01712-CV JUAN PREMITIVO CASTRO AKA JUAN PIUMITIVO CASTRO AKA JUAN P. CASTRO, JOSEFINA CASTRO, AND EUSABIO PALACIOS, Appellants V. SELF-HELP VENTURES FUND, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-02250 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee in this case is past due. By postcards dated December 20, 2012, we notified appellants the $175 filing fee was due. We directed appellants to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly ca utioned appellants that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of the appeal. Further, by postc ards also dated December 20, 2012, we notified appellants the docketing statement had not been file d in this appeal. We directed appellants to file a docketing statement within ten days and cautioned appellants that failure to do so might result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date , appellants have not paid the filing fee, filed a docketing statement, or otherwise corresponded w ith the Court regarding the status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b)(c).

121712F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

JUAN PREMITIVO CASTRO, ET AL, Appellants
No. 05-12-01712-CV V. SELF-HELP VENTURES FUND, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-02250. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers a nd Lewis participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee SELF-HELP VENTURES FUND recover its costs of this appeal from appellants JUAN P. CA STRO, JOSEFINA CASTRO, AND EUSABIO PALACIOS.
Judgment entered July 1, 2013

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE