alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 241

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 565

[Report No. 103–830]

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 455) to amend title 31, United

States Code, to increase Federal payments to units of general local

government for entitlement lands, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 4, 1994

Mr. GORDON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 455) to amend

title 31, United States Code, to increase Federal payments to units of general local government for entitlement lands, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (S. 455) to amend title 31, United States

6 Code, to increase Federal payments to units of general
2

HRES 565 RH

1 local government for entitlement lands, and for other pur2 poses. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

3 All points of order against consideration of the bill are

4 waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

5 the amendments made in order by this resolution and shall

6 not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

7 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

8 on Natural Resources. After general debate the bill shall

9 be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule

10 and shall be considered as read. No amendment shall be

11 in order except those printed in the report of the Commit12 tee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each amend13 ment may be offered only in the order printed in the re14 port, may be offered only by a Member designated in the

15 report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for

16 the time specified in the report equally divided and con17 trolled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be

18 subject to amendment except as specified in the report,

19 and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the

20 question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole.

21 All points of order against the amendments printed in the

22 report are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of

23 the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and re24 port the bill to the House with such amendments as may

25 have been adopted. The previous question shall be consid-
3

HRES 565 RH

1 ered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

2 final passage without intervening motion except one mo3 tion to recommit with or without instructions.
House Calendar No. 241

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 565

[Report No. 103–830]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 455) to

poses.ernment for entitlement lands, and for other purFederal payments to units of general local govamend title 31, United States Code, to increase

OCTOBER 4, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# C_2023127EN.01003301.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Belaeronavigatsia v Council

(Case T-536/21) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus - Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists - Concept of ‘person responsible for repression’ - Error of assessment - Proportionality)

(2023/C 127/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Belaeronavigatsia (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Meyer and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and M. Carpus Carcea, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1001 of 21 June 2021 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2021 L 219 I, p. 67), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/999 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2021 L 219 I, p. 55), of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/307 of 24 February 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 97), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/300 of 24 February 2022 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Belaeronavigatsia to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Belaeronavigatsia to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.

---
Order entered July 30, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00888-CV 

IN RE AMY E. DAVIS, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 06-06944 

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges and Justice Stoddart 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT 

 CHIEF JUSTICE
#### James H. PRICE, individually and as last director and trustee of James H. Price & Co., Inc., a dissolved corporation, Voyle C. Johnson and Airlift International, Inc., Petitioners, v. William T. KRUGLAK, II, and Robert L. Achor, Respondents.

No. 41128.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 21, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
No. 10909.

#### The Aetna Indemnity Company *v.*Kander.

Decided March 2, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Messrs. Southard & Southard*and *Messrs. Lexozv, MacKellar & Wells,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Chittenden & Chittenden,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

             INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements of
ION Networks, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form S-8 [File No. 033-61837, 333-14681,
333-76809, 333-50204, and 333-76568] of our report dated February 11, 2005, on
our audits of the financial statements of ION Networks, Inc. and Subsidiary as
of December 31, 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, which
reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

Marcum & Kliegman LLP

March 22, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Evergreen Solar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A.
Farber, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, aS adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark A. Farber


Mark A. Farber
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/28/2011 11:00 AM

Subject: Re: Any word on CO?



### Thanks for the update Heidi. We look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible.

Lydia
November 3, 2014 

Mr. Michael F. Martin 

US Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Martin, 

Western Nebraska Regional Airport in Scottsbluff, Nebraska desperately needs essential air service on a 

daily basis to Denver, Colorado and other regional airports. Denver is a nearly 4 hour drive from 

Scottsbluff. Many depend on air service to connect with outbound flights from Denver International 

Airport. We live in a region with unpredictable and severe weather and often the roads to Denver are 

dangerous at best and sometimes completely closed. Flying to Denver is often the only feasible way to 

.travel there._ ·_ 

MC;lny people in our community with serious health conditions need flight service for medical appointments 

·in Denver, including our region's military veterans, some of who sustained serious injuries in the recent 

war~ overseas. 

Finally, business and professional people-including medical and education personnel-depend on 

flights to Denver to save time and money when attending meetings and professional development 

conferences. This includes employees of Regional West Medical Center and Western Nebraska 

Community College. So much time and money is saved when we are able to fly out of Scottsbluff instead 

of driving to Denver, paying for parking and possibly overnig_hts in h~ot~ls ju~t .to rnake connecting with 

flfghts·out'of'DIA~poSsible:·- ·· ···<' : ,-~.:' · . <. ::':V ·' --~, 1w""'··'-· 1 v'· '·' · 

Western Nebraska Regional Airport held a special board·h1eet1ii_9 tcPdiscuss1the Essential Air Service 

Please support the bid of Aerodynamics Inc. (AD I). ADi's bid wa~ $3.64 million for a 50 passenger flight 

that would run a 20-25 minute flight to Denver International Airport twicea day, Monday through Friday 

and once a day on Saturday and Sunday. The company isJJ?.se,~ .?utof Atlanta and has a corporate 

office in Cleveland. ADI is also pursuing contracts in North Platte and Ke~fr'ney. . 

Thank you·for.youi'time and attentio ,to Essential Air Service, f_or. Vlfe.~tern: Nebraska, .,. .·,: i 'l -~ '\ . 'I • ' i '· ··. •··;: H ' l: , , , ~ 1 !,; : "'-• , , 

. ".·. 

. ' 

PO Box 945 · ' ' ' .. ' ! ( • ; i• J •.. . ~" : ' . 

Scottsbluff, NE 69363 

. ;,..· .. i 

··t;-,;·· -.. -.1.
# C_2023035EN.01005001.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/50

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-221/21) (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Area-related aid scheme - Financial corrections - Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ - Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 - Article 5(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 499/2014)

(2023/C 35/58)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and C. Gerardis, G. Rocchitta and E. Feola, avvocati dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi, J. Aquilina and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the Italian Republic seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/261 of 17 February 2021 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2021 L 59, p. 10), in so far as it concerns certain expenditure it has incurred.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/261 of 17 February 2021 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it imposes a flat rate correction of 2 % on the Italian Republic relating to area aid granted in Italy in the amount of EUR 67 368 272,99 for the claim year 2017; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/261 of 17 February 2021 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it imposes a flat rate correction of 2 % on the Italian Republic relating to area aid granted in Italy in the amount of EUR 67 368 272,99 for the claim year 2017;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 14.6.2021.

---
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION December 16 , 2010 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Environmental Groups FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on Fri day , December 10 , 2010 b etween several environmental groups and EPA and included the following individuals: Luke Tonafel (NRDC), Don Anair (UCS), Therese Langer (ACEEE), Siddiq Khan (ACEEE), Coralie Cooper (NESCAUM), Vickie Patton (EDF), Drew Kodjak (I CCT), Hil ary Sinnamon (EDF), Ben Sharpe (ICCT), Jesse Prentice

- Dunn (Sierra Club) EPA: By ron Bunker, Cheryl By

num, Tony

Fernandez, and Angela Cullen The discussion focused on stringency of the proposed engine and vehicle standards, advanced technology

credits, and data collection.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 34880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Importer of Controlled Substances Registration

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Registrants listed below have applied for and been granted 
registration by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as importers 
of various classes of schedule I or II controlled substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The companies listed below applied to be 
registered as importers of various basic classes of controlled 
substances. Information on previously published notices is listed in 
the table below. No comments or objections were submitted and no 
requests for hearing were submitted for these notices.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Company                   FR Docket           Published
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Novitium Pharma, LLC............  83 FR 13520.......  March 29, 2018.
Rhodes Technologies.............  83 FR 22517.......  May 15, 2018.
Xcelience.......................  83 FR 22519.......  May 15, 2018.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the 
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823, 952(a) and 958(a) and determined that the 
registration of the listed registrants to import the applicable basic 
classes of schedule I or II controlled substances is consistent with 
the public interest and with United States obligations under 
international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 
1971. The DEA investigated each company's maintenance of effective 
controls against diversion by inspecting and testing each company's 
physical security systems, verifying each company's compliance with 
state and local laws, and reviewing each company's background and 
history.
    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in 
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the DEA has granted a registration as 
an importer for schedule I or II controlled substances to the above 
listed companies.

    Dated: July 12, 2018.
John J. Martin,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-15666 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### ARTHREE, INC., d/b/a The Carriage House, Appellant, v. R. Ray GOODE, as County Manager, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1404.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 16, 1973.

Pallot, Stern, Proby & Adkins, Miami, for appellant.

Stuart Simon, Co. Atty., and Robert A. Ginsburg, Asst. Co. Atty., for appellees.

Before PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment upholding appellees’ assessment of the appellant’s property for purposes of ad valorem taxation is affirmed. The record reveals sufficient competent evidence to sustain the assessment. See Powell v. Kelly, Fla.1969, 223 So.2d 305; Whitman v. Overstreet, Fla.App.1969, 230 So.2d 46.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1017 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1017

To withhold all United States funds from the United Nations unless the 
    United Nations carries out certain administrative and budgetary 
                                reforms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 25 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

 Mr. Pressler introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To withhold all United States funds from the United Nations unless the 
    United Nations carries out certain administrative and budgetary 
                                reforms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
any provision of law or treaty, no United States funds shall be made 
available to the United Nations or any of its specialized agencies 
unless the President certifies to the Congress that--
            (1)(A) the United Nations has established a permanent 
        position of inspector general within its administrative staff;
            (B) the United Nations inspector general has begun to carry 
        out his duties; and
            (2) the United Nations is conducting budgetary audits, 
        reviewing those audits, and implementing corrective measures, 
        if necessary.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hubert A.J. Whyte, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



June 08, 2004

/s/ Hubert A. J. Whyte



Hubert A. J. Whyte

President and Chief Executive Officer





#
#### James Henry McKISSICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-921.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 24, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Abraham FLEISCHMAN et al., Appellants, v. David A. MORRIS, Appellee.

No. 72-12.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 11, 1972.

Cushman & Cushman, Miami, for appellants.

Abbott, Frumkes & Albadeff, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ., and NATHAN, RAYMOND G., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellants’ (defendants below) motion to vacate default and a final judgment consequent upon such default.

Appellee filed his second amended complaint against appellants September 16, 1970, seeking to recover damages as a result of an alleged negligent operation by the appellants as owners of apartment *279house property. Such complaint, as well as the prior complaints, alleged that each and all of the defendants were residents of Dade County, Florida. No personal service of process under F.S. 48.031, F.S.A. was issued or served pursuant to the second amended complaint. On September 24, 1970, an affidavit was filed on behalf of the appellee to the effect that a letter was written to the manager of the appellants’ apartment house asking for their residence and mailing address and failure to respond to such letter would indicate that defendants were concealing their whereabouts. The affidavit further recited that the manager reported by telephone call to affiant and stated that the defendants live in Peru but he had instructions from them not to write to them or contact them in any way. Appellee then attempted to effect substituted service of process under F.S. 48.161 and F.S. 48.181, F.S.A. A default was entered against appellants on December 15, 1970, and final judgment on March 4, 1971.

Appellants contend that there is no affidavit or pleading setting forth the facts showing that defendants or any one of them were subject to such statutory authorized service of process. Appellee relies on the affidavit which alleges concealment by appellants of their whereabouts for service of process under F.S. 48.161 and F.S. 48.181, F.S.A.

Statutes providing for substituted service must be strictly construed and one seeking to effect service under it has the burden of presenting facts which clearly justifies its applicability. See Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 903. In the case sub judice, the record reflects that personal service of process was attempted only on one of the defendants against whom'default and judgment was entered even though they were all alleged to be residents of Dade County, Florida. Further, neither the affidavit nor the record reflects that sufficient search and inquiry was actually made to ascertain that each of the appellants were concealing their whereabouts.

Therefore, the order denying defendants’ motion to vacate the default and final judgment thereon is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.