alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1044 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the 

area of the World War II Memorial in the District of 

Columbia a suitable plaque or an inscription with the 

words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed with 

the United States on D-Day, June 6, 1944. 
2 

†S 1044 ES

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘World War II Memo5 rial Prayer Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF PLAQUE OR INSCRIPTION AT 

7 WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL. 

8 The Secretary of the Interior— 

9 (1) shall install in the area of the World War 

10 II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable 

11 plaque or an inscription with the words that Presi12 dent Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed with the United 

13 States on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day; 

14 (2) shall design, procure, prepare, and install 

15 the plaque or inscription referred to in paragraph 

16 (1); and 

17 (3) may not use Federal funds to prepare or in18 stall the plaque or inscription referred to in para19 graph (1), but may accept and expend private con20 tributions for this purpose. 

21 SEC. 3. COMMEMORATIVE WORKS ACT. 

22 Chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (com23 monly known as the ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’), shall 
3 

†S 1044 ES

1 apply to the design and placement of the plaque within 

2 the area of the World War II Memorial. 

Passed the Senate June 5, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1044 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in 

D-Day, June 6, 1944. D. Roosevelt prayed with the United States on scription with the words that President Franklin District of Columbia a suitable plaque or an inthe area of the World War II Memorial in the
[No. 957-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

December 20, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Ronald Lee Hester, *Respondent.*
**Exhibit 31.1****Certifications**I, Dennis R. Wolters, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Day International Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:October 4, 2006 By: /s/ Dennis R. Wolters       Dennis R. Wolters  President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-85634, 33-89124, 333-76957, 333-49290 and 333-139969 and Form S-3 Nos. 333-124355, 333-135580, 333-135581 and 333-138061) ofSkyTerra Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean,Virginia 

March 15, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-8(No. 33-40042),
Form S-3(No. 33-52590) and Form S-8(No. 33-72414) of First-Knox Banc Corp. Of
our report dated January 18, 1996 on the 1995 consolidated financial
statements of First-Knox Banc Corp., which report is incorporated by reference
in this Form 10-K.

                                         Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 26, 1996


                                                                         Page 95
#### Floyd F. FOSTER, et al. v. STATE.

No. 38602.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 220 So.2d 406.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, DavidKirwan, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Fischer ImagingCorporation;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.             Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b.             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.             Disclosed in thisannual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

a.             All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlsover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 1, 2006 | /s/ DAVID  KIRWAN                     |   |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|              | David Kirwan*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant



                                                        State or
                                                    Jurisdiction of
  Name of Subsidiary                                 Incorporation
  ------------------                                 -------------

MSC Pre Finish Metals Inc.                           Illinois

MSC Pre Finish Metals (EGV) Inc.                     Delaware

MSC Pre Finish Metals (MV) Inc.                      Delaware

MSC Pre Finish Metals (MT) Inc.                      Delaware

MSC Walbridge Coatings Inc.                          Delaware

MSC Specialty Films, Inc.                            California

MSC Laminates and Composites Inc.                    Delaware

MSC Laminates and Composites (EGV) Inc.              Delaware

Material Sciences Foreign Sales Corporation          U. S. Virgin Islands

Solar-Gard International, Inc.                       Florida

MSC Specialty Films (UK) Limited                     United Kingdom

Solar-Gard (Canada) Inc.                             Canada

MSC Specialty Films (Australasia) Pty. Limited       Australia

Solar-Gard (SEA) Pte., Ltd.                          Singapore

Innovative Specialty Films, LLC                      Delaware

MSC Pinole Point Steel Inc.                          Delaware

MSC Pre Finish Metals (PP) Inc.                      Delaware
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1289 

To retain the existing vehicle weight limitations for vehicles traveling along 

any segment of U.S. Highway 78 within Mississippi after such segment 

is incorporated into the Interstate Highway System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2013 

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To retain the existing vehicle weight limitations for vehicles 

traveling along any segment of U.S. Highway 78 within 

Mississippi after such segment is incorporated into the 

Interstate Highway System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RETENTION OF VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS 

4 ON U.S. HIGHWAY 78. 

5 Section 127(a) of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating paragraph (12) as para8 graph (13); and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1289 IS

1 (2) by inserting after paragraph (11) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(12) With respect to all segments of the Inter4 state Highway System within Mississippi that were 

5 previously designated as U.S. Highway 78, the sin6 gle axle weight, tandem axle weight, gross vehicle 

7 weight, and bridge formula limits set forth in para8 graph (2) shall not apply to a vehicle using any such 

9 segment if the vehicle could have legally operated on 

10 such segment before it was designated as part of the 

11 Interstate Highway System.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-85634, 33-89124, 333-76957, 333-49290, 333-139969 and 333-153375, Form S-3 Nos. 333-124355, 333-135580, 333-135581, 333-138061 and 333-155209, and Form S-4 No. 333-144093) of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. of our reports dated February 28, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial        statements of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

February 28, 2009
#### The BROWN FENCE & WIRE COMPANY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7114.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 11, 1937.

Davies & Eshner, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

E. B. Freed, U. S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The judgment below (9 F.Supp. 1008), is affirmed upon the authority of Founders General Corporation, Petitioner, v. James J. Hocy, Collector, etc., Nos. 398, 331 and 330, 300 U.S. -, 57 S.Ct. 457, 81 L.Ed. — , announced by the United States Supreme Court on March 1, 1937.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Donald Gee, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,

not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant

and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known

to us by others within those entities, particularly during the

period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about

the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of

the end of the period covered by this report based on such

evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the

registrant's most recent fiscal that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design

or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Donald Gee

---------------------------

Donald Gee

Chief Executive Officer



May 12, 2006
March 10, 2015 

MEMO to FILE 

Telephone conversation with Jack Hughes of Norfolk Southern Railroad. Mr. Hughes asked about the 

status of the upcoming final rule on creosote treated railroad ties and the upcoming proposal from 

Treated Wood Council on other types of treated wood. I told him both rules are scheduled to be issued 

this year. He also stated that his company would like to see manufacturers make ties from copper 

naphenate. 

George Faison
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Freddy Richard PARKER v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53429.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1973.

In re: Freddy Richard Parker applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. Based upon evidentiary hearing, plea of guilty was intelligently and voluntarily entered.
#### M. P., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-127.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 16, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 20, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, and Kurt Marmar, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, and CHARLES CARROLL AND HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, a juvenile, was charged as a delinquent upon the basis of his alleged participation in the breaking and entering of a store with intent to commit larceny. His trial was held before a referee pursuant to Chapter 20808, Laws of Florida, 1941. The appellant was represented by a public defender who offered no objection to the procedure. Nevertheless, on this appeal the appellant contends that the failure to grant him a trial before the court was fundamental error. We agree and reverse upon authority of our holding in K. M. v. State, Fla.App.1973, 277 So.2d 577.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
#### Mary Jean KOLARIK, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Joseph Kolarik, Deceased, Petitioner, v. RODGERS BROS. SERVICE, INC., etc. Respondent.

No. 43097.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 23, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 268 So.2d 187.

ERVIN, Acting C. J, and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ, concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1188 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1188

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition of 
   full-time employee for purposes of the individual mandate in the 
              Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2013

  Ms. Collins (for herself and Mr. Donnelly) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition of 
   full-time employee for purposes of the individual mandate in the 
              Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Forty Hours Is Full Time Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE.

    Section 4980H(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(E), by striking ``by 120'' and 
        inserting ``by 174''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A) by striking ``30 hours'' and 
        inserting ``40 hours''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 105 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 105

To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a full audit of 
 hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-
                     Katrina hurricane protection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 23 (legislative day, January 3), 2013

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a full audit of 
 hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-
                     Katrina hurricane protection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUDIT OF HURRICANE PROTECTION FUNDING AND COST ESTIMATES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 270 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Government Accountability Office, in 
coordination with the National Academy of Engineering, shall conduct 
and submit to Congress a full audit of hurricane protection funding and 
cost estimates associated with post-Katrina hurricane protection.
    (b) Purposes.--The purposes of the audit shall be--
            (1) to identify the causes for the extraordinary 
        miscalculations in cost estimates of damage caused by Hurricane 
        Katrina that were completed before the date of enactment of 
        this Act;
            (2) to conduct an analysis of resources available and work 
        required with respect to hurricane protection funding and post-
        Katrina hurricane protection; and
            (3) to identify strategies to replenish reprogrammed 
        funding from out-year work to immediate needs.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joan V. LEE et al., Appellants, v. GILBERT, SILVERSTEIN & HELLMAN, P. A., Appellee.

No. 77-3.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 25, 1977.

Jerry B. Schreiber, Miami, for appellants.

Gilbert, Silverstein & Heilman and Maynard J. Heilman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal we are asked to review the propriety of an order on a charging lien awarding a lawyer $2,500 for legal services rendered to a client on a tort claim. The client appeals and contends that there was insufficient evidence adduced in the trial court to support the order appealed from because no expert testimony was offered. We agree and reverse. A trial court may not fix attorneys fees without expert testimony. *Lamar v. Lamar,*323 So.2d 43 (Fla.4th DCA 1975); *Nivens v. Nivens,*312 So.2d 201 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); *Ortiz v. Ortiz,*211 So.2d 243, 245 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); *Lyle v. Lyle,*167 So.2d 256 (Fla.2d DCA 1964).

Reversed.