alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                    GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  GE  Global  Insurance  Holding
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Ronald R.  Pressman,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
         material respects, the financial condition and  result of operations of
         the Company.



  /s/ Ronald R. Pressman
--------------------------
Ronald R. Pressman
Chief Executive Officer
July 31, 2002


                                       14
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph J. Ueberroth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph J. Ueberroth                        
|Joseph J. Ueberroth                            
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 8, 2007                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           18,863
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     781
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 21,194
<CASH>                                         374
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             6,569
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         1,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 38,589
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                22,618
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            2,632
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          2,419
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                1,653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    150
<COMMON>                                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   38,589
<PREMIUMS>                                     5,571
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            964
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             398
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 289
<BENEFITS>                                     4,733
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    1,395
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                438
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            433
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   433
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors of Newhall Management Corporation
 and Partners of The Newhall Land and Farming Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Numbers 033-53767, 033-53769, 033-58171 and 333-15303) of The Newhall Land
and Farming Company of our report dated January 15, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of The Newhall Land and Farming Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears
in the December 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K of The Newhall Land and
Farming Company.


                                              KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 21, 1997
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clarence WHITE.

No. 60821.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

Elizabeth W. Cole, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Clarence White was charged by bill of information with possession of heroin, a controlled dangerous substance. La. R.S. 40:966. On October 1,1975, he was tried before a twelve person jury and found guilty as charged. The trial court subsequently sentenced him to serve eight years at hard labor. On appeal, defendant alleges that six trial errors merit reversal of his conviction and sentence.

Having reviewed the assignments of error, we find them to be without merit and accordingly affirm defendant’s conviction.

However, we note *ex proprio motu*a possible error in the sentence, which appears on the face of the record. See, La. p.Cr.P. art. 920; *State v. Jones,*341 So.2d 3 (La.1976). Following his conviction, defendant was found to be an habitual offender under the provisions of La. R.S. 15:529.1. The court minutes indicate that he was sentenced to serve eight years at hard labor on his conviction for possession of heroin and eight years on his conviction as a multiple offender, with the two sentences to run concurrently.

Because La. R.S. 15:529.1 is merely a penalty-enhancing device and an indictment thereunder does not charge a criminal offense, the statute permits the imposition of only one sentence. See, *State*v. *Tillett,*351 So.2d 1153 (La.1977); *State v. Hill,*340 So.2d 309 (La.1976). Any sentence imposed for the substantive offense prior to the filing of an habitual offender charge is to be vacated coincidentally with imposition of the enhanced penalty. *State v. Tillett,*su*1361pra. If the minutes in this case accurately reflect the imposition of two concurrent sentences for the same crime, the sentence is erroneous. Therefore, the case is remanded for correction of the sentence, if necessary, in accordance with law.

Affirmed and remanded.
Exhibit 21


                                 Subsidiaries
                                  VPGI Corp.
                                  ----------
                                 June 30, 2003


                                     State            Date
 Name                                  of           Acquired/
 ----                             Incorporation      Created      Status
 (100% ownership,                 -------------      -------      ------
 unless otherwise shown)

 uniView Technologies Products
   Group, Inc.                        Texas          08-10-98    Inactive

 uniView Softgen Corporation (61%)    Texas          10-27-99    Inactive

 uniView Asia Limited (60%)           Hong Kong      06-26-02    Inactive

 Curtis Mathes Corporation            Delaware       11-12-93    Inactive
# Official Journal L 213/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 213 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6214 August 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 213

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6214 August 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1346 of 8 August 2019 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pomodoro S. Marzano dell'Agro Sarnese-Nocerino’ (PDO)) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1346 of 8 August 2019 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pomodoro S. Marzano dell'Agro Sarnese-Nocerino’ (PDO))

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.3

                            PAGEMART WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------
                                                     NUMBER                PERCENT           EQUIVALENT
                                                    OF SHARES            OUTSTANDING           SHARES
                                                   ----------            -----------        ------------
<S>                                                <C>                   <C>                <C>
COMMON STOCK

From Founders' Stock                                2,300,000                 100.00%          2,300,000
Stock Options Exercised                             1,167,063                  92.47%          1,079,210
Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock          15,310,943                 100.00%         15,310,943
1994 Common Stock Offerings                        11,242,857                 100.00%         11,242,857
1995 Common Stock Offerings                         4,323,874                 100.00%          4,323,874
1996 Common Stock Offerings                         6,000,000                 100.00%          6,000,000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued            127,399                  90.37%            115,135
Warrants Exercised                                    130,513                  48.10%             62,775
                                                   ----------                               ------------
                                                   40,602,649                                 40,434,794

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                           40,434,794

NET LOSS                                                                                    $(74,794,192)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                          $     ($1.85)
                                                                                            ============
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10-X


                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$500,000.00                                                       May 31, 2000


     On June 1, 2001 we promise to pay to the order of NATIONAL  MEDICAL  HEALTH
CARD SYSTEMS,  INC.  FIVE HUNDRED  THOUSAND AND NO CENTS  ($500,000.00)  DOLLARS
Payable at 26 Harbor Park Drive,  Port  Washington,  NY 11050 for value received
with interest at nine and one-half percent (9-1/2%) per annum payable quarterly.
The Lender represents that this loan may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

                                                      SANDATA, INC.
                                                      By:


                                                      s/s Bert E. Brodsky
                                                      Bert E. Brodsky, Chairman


Witness:

/s/Linda Scarpantonio
/s/Laurie G. Hof
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart-Tek Solutions
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: November ___, 2010

/s/ Brian BonarBrian BonarChief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE June 30, 1998
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IAC, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000947431
<NAME>                                  IAC, Inc.

       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998          
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998       
<CASH>                                       0          
<SECURITIES>                                 0          
<RECEIVABLES>                                0         
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0         
<INVENTORY>                                  0         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0         
<PP&E>                                       0         
<DEPRECIATION>                               0         
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,429         
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    4,982         
<BONDS>                                      0         
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0         
<PREFERRED>                            630,000         
<COMMON>                             1,172,895         
<OTHER-SE>                             702,545         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,429         
<SALES>                                      0         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             0         
<CGS>                                        0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              0        
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0        
<DISCONTINUED>                               0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0         
<CHANGES>                                    0         
<NET-INCOME>                                 0         
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.0        
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.0           
        


</TABLE>
TS-EMLA50/60/70/80 

Attachment #6 

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 3 

Environmental Release and Disposal Information on the New Chemical Substance at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter-Manufacture and Processing
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-5794

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GARRETT C. VICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CR-95-19)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: September 30, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sydney K. L. West, HORNE, WEST & MCMURTRIE, Gloucester, Virginia,

for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Robert E.

Bradenham II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Garrett C. Vick entered a guilty plea to distributing 9.748

grams of crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a), (b)

(West 1981 & Supp. 1996), and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1988). The district

court sentenced Vick to fifty-one months incarceration, ordered

five years of supervised release, and imposed a $50 special

assessment. In his plea agreement, Vick agreed to waive his right

to appeal any sentence within the statutory maximum on any ground.

Vick now seeks to appeal his sentence by challenging the constitutionality of the 100-to-1 ratio of crack to powder cocaine. We

dismiss the appeal.

During the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, the court questioned

Vick about the waiver provision contained in the plea agreement,

and Vick stated that he understood the provision. A defendant may

waive his statutory right to appeal his sentence if the waiver is

knowing and voluntary. United States v. Marin, 961 F.2d 493, 496

(4th Cir. 1992). For a waiver to be knowing and voluntary, the

district court should specifically question the defendant about the

waiver provision before accepting his plea. Whether the waiver is

effective is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. Based on Vick's

statements at the plea colloquy, we find that the waiver was made

knowingly and voluntarily.
* Had we found that the waiver was ineffective, we would

affirm the sentence. See United States v. Hayden, 85 F.3d 153, 157-

58 (4th Cir. 1996) (holding that statute providing higher penalties

for cocaine base than cocaine powder not unconstitutional and

finding that recent report by United States Sentencing Commission,

rejected by Congress, did not change court's view of crack-topowder sentencing disparity).

3

We therefore dismiss the appeal.* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### WESTERN CASUALTY AND SURETY CO. v. Donald MEYER.

No. 38800.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 223 So.2d 81.
251 La. 732

#### STATE of Louisiana v. David L. MITCHELL.

No. 49078.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1968.

In re: David L. Mitchell applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and stay order.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of LOUD Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James T. Engen andTimothy P. O’Neil, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 14,  2005 | By:    |   | /s/ James T. Engen                                                                                                   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | James T. Engen                                                                                                       |
|                                 |   |   | *President  and Chief Executive Officer*                                                                             |
|                                 |   |   |                                                                                                                 |
|                                 |   |   |                                                                                                                 |
|                                 |   |   | /s/ Timothy P. O’Neil                                                                                           |   |
|                                 |   |   | Timothy P. O’Neil                                                                                               |
|                                 |   |   | *Chief  Financial Officer, Vice  President, Secretary and  Treasurer (Principal Financial  and  Accounting Officer)* |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LOUDTechnologies Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----