alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1











INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Clacendix, Inc. (Formerly ION Networks, Inc.) on Form S-8 [File No. 333-139072] of our report dated April 14, 2008, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Clacendix, Inc. (Formerly ION Networks, Inc.) as of December 31, 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Clacendix, Inc. (Formerly ION Networks, Inc.) for the year ended December 31, 2007.







/s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP





New York, New York

May 28, 2008
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 30171 Su m m ar y Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. E A R L K E N B U C H A N A N , a ls o k n o w n a s E a r l S c r o g g in s , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 5: 01- C R
- 50027- 1
B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * The Fed e r al Publ i c D e fe nde r ap po i nt e d t o r e pr e s e nt Ear lK e n Buc hana n has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . Ca lif o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S. 738 (1967 )
. Bucha nanha s no tf i l e d ar e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r ivo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November

18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o . [5 th C ir c u it C a s e N o .]

2 G RANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Scott, Appellant.

[656 NYS2d 908]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robinson, J.), rendered August 22, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

The defendant contends, and the People concede, that he was denied his right to a public trial *(see,*US Const 6th Amend; Civil Rights Law § 12; Judiciary Law § 4; *People v Jones,*47 NY2d 409, *cert denied*444 US 946) because the Supreme Court excluded his girlfriend and their child during the testimony of an undercover police officer. When the defendant objected to the exclusion of his family, the People offered no evidence that the family could be a threat to the officer. Nor did the Supreme Court make findings that the family would be a threat *(see, People v Kin Kan,*78 NY2d 54, 58-59; *People v Gutierez,*86 NY2d 817; *cf., People v Dorcas,*218 AD2d 813). Thus, the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

*545In light of our determination herein, we do not address the defendant’s remaining contention. Copertino, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.
#### Johnny HOGAN, Appellant, v. The CITY OF ORLANDO, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 782.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 9, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Evergreen Solar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard G.
Chleboski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard G. Chleboski
-----------------------------
Richard G. Chleboski
Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 116 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 421

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 116

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

              For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                  May 5 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 421
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 116

              For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                  May 5 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

                Reported by Mr. Biden, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
any provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et 
seq.), Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles shall be held and considered to have 
been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required 
visa fee. Upon the granting of permanent residence to such alien as 
provided for in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by the proper number, during the current 
fiscal year or the fiscal year next following, the total number of 
immigrant visas which are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of such Act, or if applicable, 
the total number of immigrant visas which are made available to natives 
of the country of the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas** 

April 14, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00668

- CV

WEST 17TH RESOURCES, LLC , Pamela Mika Wolf, and Thomas Mika,

Appellant s

v.

Lucian A. PAWELEK and Carleen J. Pawelek,

Appellee s

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 04

- 00087

- CVK

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Second Motion for Ext ension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. T he

appellee ’ s brief is due on May 8, 2015.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS W HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of April, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Oct 04 2010 

Mr. Russell Schaub 

Chief Pilot 

EagleMed, LLC. 

6601 Pueblo Road 

Wichita, KS 67209 

Dear Mr. Schaub: 

We have received your September 20, 2010, correspondence withdrawing your petition for 

exemption that posted to the docket (No. FAA-2010-0492) on May 6, 2010. 

Your letter has been placed in the public docket. No further action will be taken on your 

petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,730,920
<SECURITIES>                                 2,629,414
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,219,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,808,844
<INVENTORY>                                  1,056,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,133,182
<PP&E>                                      18,569,412
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,610,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,378,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,384,036
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       110,034
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,234,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,388,719
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,313,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,893,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,046,634
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,589,499
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,033,138
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,556,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,556,361
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ellen McDaniel FLOOD.

No. 53215.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Mar. 1, 1973.

In re: Ellen McDaniel Flood applying for writ of certiorari, review, prohibition and mandamus.

Granted. Hearing ordered. See State v. Migliore, 261 La. 722, 260 So.2d 682.

SANDERS, J.,

is of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge was correct. See State v. Hunter, 250 La. 295, 195 So.2d 273 (1967).

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents against another step by this court against law and order. See my dissent in State v. Migliore, 260 So.2d 690.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that law, order and justice require the granting of the writ.
#### Frank THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-375.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 8, 1970.

Paul L. Martz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

*881Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Willie James LYNN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-1080.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 11, 1968.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Herbert M. Klein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Arthur L. Rothenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

*33PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Hunter v. State, 29 Fla. 486, 10 So. 730; Goodwin v. State, 157 Fla. 751, 26 So.2d 898; Manning v. State, Fla. 1957, 93 So.2d 716; State v. Trafficante, Fla.App.1962, 136 So.2d 264; Allison v. State, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 922; Harrell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 306.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


                                                                 August 16, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebLink Wireless, Inc. (the
"company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), pursuant
to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Kelly W. Prentiss,
Chief Financial Officer of WebLink Wireless, Inc., certify that, to the best of
my knowledge:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the company.



                             /s/ KELLY W. PRENTISS
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Kelly W. Prentiss
                             V.P. Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                             August 16, 2002
# C_2023252EN.01004901.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/49

---

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2023 — Bategu Gummitechnologie v Commission

(Case T-771/21) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Competition - Decision rejecting a complaint - Material loss - Reality and certainty of the damage - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2023/C 252/58)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Bategu Gummitechnologie GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: G. Maderbacher, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Szczodrowski and A. Keidel, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the material loss which it allegedly suffered as a result of the European Commission’s unlawful conduct in proceedings ‘AT.40492 — Fire Protection Bogies’ concerning a complaint lodged pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles [101 and 102 TFEU] (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Bategu Gummitechnologie GmbH shall pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Bategu Gummitechnologie GmbH shall pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.

---
No. 00-936.

#### Carlson *v.*Hyundai Motor Co. et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order entered September 1 6 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00525
- CV DONALD DAVIS, Appellant
V. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellee On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. DF
- 05
- 01417
- T 

### O RDER On July 28, 2015, we ordered Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing certain items requested by appellant. We further ordered Ms. Pitre to file written verification of any items that could not be located. The supplemental clerk’s record has been filed, but it does not include all the items requested or written verification that those items could not be located. Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Pitre to file, no later than Septemb er 25, 2015, either (1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the following items or (2) written verification the se items cannot be located :

• May 23, 2005 “response/answer/request to dismiss;”

• January 22, 2015 “notice of dismissal hearing;” and,• Febr uary 26, 2015 , March 18, 2015, and April 7, 2015 “notice of hearing for defendant’s second amended request/motion for sanctions/taxation and bill of cost under frivolous claim act

. ”
We DENY appellant’s September 14, 2015 “motion for sanctions against the Dallas County District Clerk for Recover y of Cost for Late Appellate Record s .”
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and all the parties.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
#### David J. Connor et al., Respondents, v Town of Manlius et al., Appellants. In the Matter of David J. Connor et al., Respondents, v Town of Manlius, et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[656 NYS2d 1020]

Order and judgment unanimously *955affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Stone, J. (Appeals from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J.—Renewal.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Doerr, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Lawrence Wright, Petitioner, v Glenn Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[735 NYS2d 833]

Lahtinen, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations of respondent Superintendent of Orleans Correctional Facility and respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner challenges two separate determinations finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. Initially, we note that the Attorney General has submitted documentation establishing that the tier III disciplinary determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Despite his contentions to the contrary, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled as to this determination and this portion of the petition is dismissed as moot *(see, Matter of Curtis v Goord,*274 AD2d 808; *Matter of Maldonado v Miller,*259 AD2d 912).

We turn next to the tier II disciplinary determination finding petitioner guilty of smuggling, making threats and violating facility correspondence procedures. Based on our review of the record, we agree with petitioner that there is insufficient evidence to support that part of the determination finding him guilty of smuggling. Additionally, with regard to the charge of. threats, the record reveals that the Hearing Officer misread petitioner’s letter and that the evidence is otherwise insufficient to support the determination insofar as it found him guilty of threats. Accordingly, those charges must be annulled and expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as there was no recommended loss of good time and petitioner served the penalty imposed, it is not necessary to remit the *780matter for a redetermination of the penalty *(see, Matter of Baez v Goord,*261 AD2d 741, 742). With regard to the remaining charge of violating facility correspondence procedures, we find that the misbehavior report, together with the evidence adduced at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see, Matter of Jackson v Portuondo,*287 AD2d 847; *Matter of Di Rose v Coombe,*233 AD2d 799). Petitioner’s remaining arguments have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the portion of the petition challenging the determination of guilt following the tier III disciplinary hearing is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Adjudged that the determination of guilt following the tier II disciplinary hearing is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of the charges of smuggling and making threats; petition granted to that extent and respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner’s institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.
EXHIBIT32

Officer Certification under 18 USC 1350

We, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofAXS-One Inc. (the "issuer"), do herebycertify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

|                                                 |  |        |  |                                                                                             |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|--------|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|                                            |  |   |  | AXS-ONEINC.                                                                                 |
| **Date:**    August 12,2005 |  |   |  | /s/ William P. LyonsWilliam P.LyonsChief Executive Officer andChairman of theBoard          |
|                                            |  |   |  | /s/Joseph Dwyer Joseph Dwyer Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer, andTreasurer |
|                                                 |

----