Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2019
                              David R. Gooldy, D.C., DAB CR5322 (2019)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




David R. Gooldy, D.C., DAB CR5322 (2019)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





David R. Gooldy, D.C.,
	(PTAN: SC6574E979),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-16-887Decision No. CR5322May 15, 2019

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, David R. Gooldy, D.C., is a chiropractor, practicing in South Carolina, who participated in the Medicare program until April 12, 2016, when the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) revoked his billing privileges, retroactive to August 24, 2015. CMS took this action pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(3), because, on December 10, 2007, Petitioner Gooldy was convicted of felony insurance fraud.
Petitioner appeals.
I find that CMS is authorized to revoke Petitioner's Medicare billing privileges because, within ten years preceding the revocation, he was convicted of a felony that CMS reasonably determined is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. I therefore affirm CMS's determination.
Background
By letter dated April 12, 2016, the Medicare contractor, Palmetto GBA, advised Petitioner that his Medicare privileges were revoked, effective August 24, 2015, the date of his re-enrollment in the Medicare program. As the letter explains, the contractor acted
**Page 2**
pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(3) because Petitioner was convicted of a felony – presenting false claims (to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina) for payment. The contractor imposed a three-year enrollment bar, pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(c). CMS Ex. 2.
Petitioner requested reconsideration. In a reconsidered determination, dated July 15, 2016, a contractor enrollment analyst upheld the revocation, citing Petitioner's felony conviction within the ten years preceding his enrollment. CMS Ex. 4. Petitioner timely appealed and that appeal is now before me.
CMS moves for summary judgment. However, because neither party proposes any witnesses, an in-person hearing would serve no purpose. *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶¶ 8, 9, 10). The matter may therefore be decided based on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.
CMS submits its brief (CMS Br.) and four exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-4). Petitioner submits a written argument (P. Br.). In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-4.
Discussion
***CMS may revoke Petitioner's Medicare enrollment because, within the preceding ten years, he was convicted of insurance fraud, a felony that CMS reasonably finds detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries***.1
**Statute and regulations**. CMS may revoke a provider's or supplier's Medicare billing privileges if, within the preceding ten years, he was convicted of a "felony offense that CMS determines is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries." 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(3); *see also* Social Security Act (Act) §§ 1842 (h)(8) and 1866(b)(2)(D). Offenses for which billing privileges may be terminated include – but are not limited to – financial crimes such as extortion, embezzlement, income tax evasion, *insurance fraud*, and similar crimes. 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(3)(ii)(B).
If, as here, the revocation is based on a felony conviction, the effective date of the revocation must normally be the date of the conviction. 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(g); *Norman Johnson, M.D.*, DAB No. 2779 at 20 (2017) (holding that ALJs are not permitted to depart from the regulation's plain text). However, inasmuch as Petitioner was apparently
**Page 3**
not participating in the Medicare program at the time of his conviction, the effective date is the date he re-enrolled.
**Petitioner's felony offense**. The record offers few details regarding the circumstances underlying Petitioner's felony conviction. On December 10, 2007, he pled guilty to presenting false claims to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina, an insurance company. CMS Ex. 1. He was sentenced to three years in prison (suspended) and ordered to pay $8,000 in restitution. CMS Ex. 1 at 3. Thus, within ten years of his Medicare enrollment, he was convicted of felony insurance fraud, a crime that is, by regulation, detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(3)(ii)(B). CMS may therefore revoke his Medicare enrollment and billing privileges, effective the date of that enrollment.
Petitioner, however, points out that the Inspector General excluded him from Medicare participation, and that CMS reinstated his enrollment and billing privileges on August 24, 2015. At the time, CMS was well aware of his felony conviction. Based on that approval, he provided services to Medicare patients. Because it approved his re-enrollment, CMS should not now be allowed to revoke; or, if allowed, the revocation should be no earlier than April 27, 2016, the date CMS notified him that his billing privileges were revoked.2
Like several of my colleagues, I am troubled by the contractors' propensity for enrolling suppliers who disclose serious felony convictions, only to revoke those enrollments years later. *See, e.g., Ian J. Griffith, PT*, DAB CR4817 at 14 n.9 (2017); *Donna Maneice, M.D.*, DAB CR4804 at 15 (2017). However, my authority here is limited. So long as the regulatory elements are satisfied – as they are here – I must affirm the revocation, and I may not alter the effective date based on principles of equity. *Cent. Kan. Cancer Inst.*, DAB No. 2749 at 10 (2016).
Thus, CMS justifiably determined that, within ten years preceding his re-enrollment, Petitioner was convicted of a felony detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. CMS may therefore revoke his Medicare enrollment. The duration of the re-enrollment bar is not subject to review. *Dennis McGinty, PT*, DAB No. 2838 at 14 (2017).
**Page 4**
Conclusion
CMS may revoke Petitioner's Medicare enrollment because, within ten years preceding his enrollment, he was convicted of a felony that, by regulation, CMS determined is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. I therefore affirm CMS's determination.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law to support my decision. back to note 1
                      2. Though Petitioner claims CMS notified him on April 27, 2016, that his billing privileges were revoked, CMS in fact notified him on April 12, 2016. CMS Ex. 2. back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back