alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 114 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 114

    To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to certain 
                 exceptions to discharge in bankruptcy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 23 (legislative day, January 3), 2013

 Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Franken, Mr. Harkin, Mr. 
  Reed, and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to certain 
                 exceptions to discharge in bankruptcy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for Struggling Students Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTIONS TO DISCHARGE.

    Section 523(a)(8) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``dependents, for'' and all that follows through the end of 
subparagraph (B) and inserting ``dependents, for an educational benefit 
overpayment or loan made, insured, or guaranteed by a governmental unit 
or made under any program funded in whole or in part by a governmental 
unit or an obligation to repay funds received from a governmental unit 
as an educational benefit, scholarship, or stipend;''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10157

Summary Calendar

REBECCA REID,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BETTY STILES,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 3:09-CR-109-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rebecca Reid appeals the dismissal of her claim against Betty Stiles,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 25, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10157 Document: 00511549645 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/25/2011
No. 11-10157

former Johnson County Justice of the Peace, for a violation of the Eighth Amendment. Stiles terminated Reid from her position as a court clerk, which Reid 1

argues was cruel and usual punishment. Eighth Amendment violations, however, do not arise “until after [the State] has secured a formal adjudication of

guilt in accordance with due process of law. Where the State seeks to impose

punishment without such an adjudication, the pertinent constitutional guarantee is the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Ingraham v.

Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 671 n.40 (1977). Because Stiles merely terminated Reid’s

employment, the Eighth Amendment’s protections are inapplicable. 

AFFIRMED.

 Reid asserted several other claims, including violations of the Fifth and Fourteenth

1

Amendments, but she appeals only the dismissal of her Eighth Amendment claim.

2

Case: 11-10157 Document: 00511549645 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/25/2011
Exhibit 7.1
 FINANCIAL
STATISTICS  FINANCIAL RATIOS
 Year ended 31 March
    
    2011
    
    2010
    
    2009
    
    2008
    
    2007Financial ratiosAdjusted basic earnings per sharea  pence
    
    
    21.0
    
    
    
    17.3
    
    
    
    14.1
    
    
    
    20.2
    
    
    
    19.1Reported basic (loss) earnings per share  pence
    
    
    19.4
    
    
    
    13.3
    
    
    
    (2.5
    )
    
    
    21.5
    
    
    
    34.4Adjusted return on capital employeda,b  %
    
    
    18.7
    
    
    
    16.0
    
    
    
    14.5
    
    
    
    17.7
    
    
    
    17.6Reported return on capital employedb  %
    
    
    16.9
    
    
    
    13.3
    
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    14.4
    
    
    
    16.5Adjusted interest cover before net pension interestc  times
    
    
    3.4
    
    
    
    2.9
    
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    3.6
    
    
    
    4.2Reported interest coverd  times
    
    
    2.8
    
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    0.5
    
    
    
    6.2
    
    
    
    27.0
 
 a
    
    Adjusted results refer to the results before specific items.b
    
    The ratio is based on profit before taxation and net
finance expense to average capital employed. Capital employed is represented
by total assets less current liabilities (excluding corporation tax, current
borrowings, derivative financial liabilities and finance lease creditors) less deferred tax assets, retirement benefit asset,
cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial assets and
investments.c
    
    The number of times net finance
expense before specific items is
covered by adjusted operating profit.d
    
    The number of times reported
net finance expense is covered by
reported operating profit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999

<CASH>                                           1,804
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,488
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,765
<PP&E>                                          14,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,848
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,899
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,361
<OTHER-SE>                                     (75,857)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,380
<SALES>                                          7,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,399
<CGS>                                            1,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,165)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)



</TABLE>
#### Johnny Lee WORTHERN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-584.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 23, 1971.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender; and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record- on appeal in this cause having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Burton v. State, 128 So.2d 765 (Fla.App.1961).

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD, K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of SkyTerra Communications, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
Nos. 33-37036, 33-37037, 33-85634, 33-85636, 33-89122, 33-89124, 333-76957 and
333-49290 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 29, 2004 with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and the related
financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2003
annual report on Form 10-K of SkyTerra Communications, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP


New York, New York
March 29, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated April 20, 2001, included in or incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-00067, 33-40610, 33-41310, 33-57648, 33-81064,
333-15679, 333-15677, 333-33885, 333-33897 and 333-88387).


                                       /s/  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Chicago, Illinois
May 25, 2001
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1125 

To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress reports on water 

sharing with Mexico. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2013 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress 

reports on water sharing with Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Working to Address 

5 Treaty Enforcement Rapidly for Texas Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORTS ON WATER SHARING WITH MEXICO. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall sub8 mit to Congress a report— 

9 (1) not later than 45 days after the date of en10 actment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter, deVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:55 Jun 13, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1125.IS S1125

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1125 IS

1 scribing efforts by Mexico to meet the treaty obliga2 tions of Mexico to deliver water to the Rio Grande, 

3 in accordance with the treaty between the United 

4 States and Mexico entitled ‘‘Utilization of Waters of 

5 the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio 

6 Grande’’ (done at Washington, February 3, 1944); 

7 and 

8 (2) not later than 1 year after the date of en9 actment of this Act, and annually thereafter, de10 scribing the benefits to the United States of the doc11 ument entitled ‘‘Interim International Cooperative 

12 Measures in the Colorado River Basin through 2017 

13 and Extension of Minute 318 Cooperative Measures 

14 to Address the Continued Effects of the April 2010 

15 Earthquake in the Mexicali Valley, Baja California’’ 

16 (done at Coronado, California, November 20, 2012 

17 (commonly referred to as ‘‘Minute Number 319’’)). 

18 (b) ACTION BY SECRETARY OF STATE.—Notwith19 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary of State 

20 shall not extend Minute Number 319 if the Secretary fails 

21 to comply with the requirements of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 12.1

Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

|                                         |  | Years Ended June 30,
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|
|Interest component of rents              |  | $                   
|Amortization of deferred financing costs |  |                     
|Other financing costs                    |  |                     
|Interest expense                         |  |                     
|                                         |  |                     
|Fixed charges                            |  |                     
|Earnings before income taxes             |  |                     
|                                         |  |                     
|Earnings before fixed charges            |  | $                   
|                                         |  |                     
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       |  |                     

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           113,018,239
<SECURITIES>                                      44,465,437
<RECEIVABLES>                                     27,170,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (3,541,482)
<INVENTORY>                                        7,426,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 193,940,281
<PP&E>                                            41,157,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (12,418,210)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   321,168,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             31,394,712
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             47,620,909
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             636,758
<OTHER-SE>                                       232,149,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     321,168,161
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 110,148,942
<CGS>                                             66,100,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     66,100,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 167,160,925
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (124,744,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (124,744,556)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (124,744,556)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (2.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (2.76)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                                     June 30, 1998          June 30, 1998
                                                   ------------------     -----------------
<S>                                                    <C>                    <C>      
Net Income                                             $  462,328             1,479,063
                                                       ==========             =========

Weighted average shares outstanding ............        3,123,154             3,119,129

Reduction for common shares not yet
  released by Employee Stock Ownership Plan ....         (244,500)             (249,790)
                                                       ----------             ---------
Total weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation ............        2,878,654             2,869,339
                                                       ==========             =========

Basic earnings per share .......................       $      .16                   .51
                                                       ==========             =========

Total weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation ............        2,878,654             2,869,339

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
  effect of stock options ......................          125,419               123,804
                                                       ----------             ---------
Total weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for diluted
  computation ..................................        3,004,073             2,993,143
                                                       ==========             =========

Diluted earnings per share .....................       $      .15                   .49
                                                       ==========             =========
</TABLE>
#### Louis D. TAHASH, Appellant, v. Patricia D. TAHASH, Appellee.

No. 71-1022.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 25, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1220 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1220

To suspend temporarily the duty on exomethylene ceph v sulfoxide ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 14 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

   Mr. Coats introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on exomethylene ceph v sulfoxide ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXOMETHYLENE CEPH V SULFOXIDE ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
    

       ``  9902.31.12   Exomethylene ceph v sulfoxide            No change      No change      On or before     
                         ester (provided for in                                                 12/31/96        
                         subheading 2934.90.40)......  Free                                                     
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, J. Gordon Huszagh, President, Chief Executive Officer & Chief
Financial Officer of Suffolk Bancorp (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 13, 2009                                        
|                                                             
|/s/ J. Gordon Huszagh                                        
|J. Gordon Huszagh                                            
|President, Chief Executive Officer, & Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

Certification required by Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kevin T. Knight, President of Nordstrom Credit, Inc., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Nordstrom Credit, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2004                      /s/ Kevin T. Knight
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Kevin T. Knight
                                          President