alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


		SPECIMENSPECIMEN NUMBERSHARES C-EdgEwisE ThErapEuTics, inc. This CerTifies ThaT: INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE C o M M o n s T o C K SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP28036F105 SPECIMEN - NOT NEGOTIABLE is The owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF $0.0001 PAR VALUE EACH OF EdgEwisE ThErapEuTics, inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder thereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. DATED: BY: BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS, INC. TRANSFER AGENT AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE SPECIMEN not negotiable GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARYPRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 


 




     


     


    

		The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in commonUNIF GIFT MIN ACT - ....................Custodian.................... TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties(Cust)(Minor) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For Value Received,hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated Signature(s) Guaranteed NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. By The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to SEC Rule 17Ad-15. THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY STOCKHOLDER, UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE DESIGNATIONS, RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS AND SERIES AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED, SO FAR AS THE SAME HAVE BEEN DETERMINED, AND OF THE AUTHORITY, IF ANY, OF THE BOARD TO DIVIDE THE SHARES INTO CLASSES OR SERIES AND TO DETERMINE AND CHANGE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF ANY CLASS OR SERIES. SUCH REQUEST MAY BE MADE TO THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION OR TO THE TRANSFER AGENT NAMED ON THIS CERTIFICATE. COLUMBIA PRINTING SERVICES, LLC - www.stockinformation.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JUN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                          24,859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,252
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,245
<INVENTORY>                                    43,3093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               199,793
<PP&E>                                          14,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                 440,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,171
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000
<COMMON>                                     1,712,635
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,988,176)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,087
<SALES>                                        902,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               937,876
<CGS>                                          676,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  676,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               493,619
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (232,217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (267,573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (230,217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.070)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.070)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                      PEPSIAMERICAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                    UNAUDITED

             (U. S. DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      SIX MONTHS ENDED                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                           JUNE 30,                              JUNE 30,
                                              ----------------------------------    ----------------------------------
                                                    2000            1999                  2000            1999
                                                 -----------     -----------           ------------    -----------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>                   <C>              <C>
Net income (loss)                              $    (3,361)   $        823           $      2,100    $       379
Effects of dilutive securities
     Stock options                                      *               *                      *              *
                                                 -----------     -----------           ------------    -----------
Net income (loss) - assuming dilution          $    (3,361)   $        823           $      2,100    $       379
                                                 ===========     ===========           ============    ===========

Average common shares outstanding                   87,314          86,760                 87,314         86,760
Effects of dilutive securities
     Stock options                                      *               33                     *              *
                                                 -----------     -----------           ------------    -----------
Average common shares outstanding -
     assuming dilution                              87,314          86,793                 87,314         86,760
                                                 ===========     ===========           ============    ===========
Net income (loss) per common share             $     (0.04)   $       0.01           $      (0.02)   $      0.00
                                                 ===========     ===========           ============    ===========
Net income (loss) per common share -
     assuming dilution                         $     (0.04)   $       0.01           $      (0.02)   $      0.00
                                                 ===========     ===========           ============    ===========
</TABLE>

Note: If an item appears with a *, the item was not applicable or the
security was antidilutive for the period presented.
#### KELLY *v.*WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 22,

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided October 11, 1962.*

*643Before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney, Marbury and Sybert, JJ.

PER Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Oppenheimer filed in the lower court, the application of Arthur Kelly for leave to appeal from the order denying him post conviction relief from his imprisonment for armed robbery is hereby denied.

*Application denied.*
# C_2023252EN.01004101.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — Skryba v Council

(Case T-581/21) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus - Freezing of funds - Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into and transit through European Union territory applies - Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists - Collective nature of a sanction - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment - Proportionality)

(2023/C 252/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Siarheï Skryba (Marialivo, Belarus) (represented by: D. Litvinski, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Limonet and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/1002 of 21 June 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2021 L 219 I, p. 70), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 221/997 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2021 L 219 I, p. 3), to the extent that those two acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Siarheï Skryba to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Siarheï Skryba to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 10.1.2022.

---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 28, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D19

- 2272 Lower Tribunal No. 18

- 35602

________________ 

### Gregorian International, Inc., et al. , Appellant s ,
vs. 

### Alejandro Enrique Delfino Thormahlen , etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, William Thomas , Judge. Damian & Valori, LLP, and Melissa Damian Visconti, and Melanie E. Damian , for appellant s

. Holland & Knight LLP, Christopher N. Bellows, Anna Marie Gamez, J. Raul Cosio and Rebecca M. Plasencia, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LINDSEY, and BOKOR , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 Celestino Martinez , a Venezuelan citizen who resides in Broward County , Florida, appeals the dismissal of his complaint against Alejandro Enrique Delfino Thormahlen on the basis of forum non conveniens. The lower court granted the motion, in favor of conducting the litigation in Venezuela, without holding an evidentiary hea ring. 1 The standard of review on dismissal of a complaint on the basis of forum non conveniens is abuse of discretion. See Fla. R. Civ. P 1.061(a) ; Abeid

- Saba v. Carnival Corp. , 184 So. 3d 593, 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)

. “ The burden of proof of each element in the forum non conveniens analysis is on
the [d] efendants. ” Publicidad Vepaco, C.A. v. Mezerhane , 176 So. 3d 273 , 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) ( citing Telemundo Network Grp., LLC v. Azteca Int ’ l Corp. , 957 So. 2d 705, 709 ( Fla. 3d DCA 2007) )

. “ The first of the four [ Kinney ] factors is the availability of an adequate alternative forum

. As explained in Cortez , ‘ [t]his factor encompasses two separate considerations: availability and adequacy. ’” Id

. at 276 (quoting Cortez v. Palace Resorts,

1 Gregorian International, Inc., was a named plaintiff only on Count I (Declaratory Judgment). Before briefs were filed and oral argument was held, the parties resolved Count I by agreeing to a stipulated final judgment as to that count only. Consequently, Gregorian is not a party to the appeal , and the only remaining counts in the amended complaint are Count II (Tortious Interference with Advantageous Business Relationships ) and Count III (Defamation Per Se).3 Inc. , 123 So. 3d 1085, 1091 (Fla. 2013) ); see also Kinney Sys. v. Cont’l Ins. Co. , 674 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1996)

. Because the record demonstrates disputed issues of fact as to the “adequacy” of the Venezuelan forum, we r everse and r emand for the lower court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and make factual findings regarding
th is factor so that this C ourt may have a sufficient record from which to
conduct its review

. Reversed and remanded.
#### Sidney BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-891.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 11, 1968.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Herbert M. Klein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Hamilton v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So. 316. See also, Hagan v. Laragione, Fla.1967, 205 So.2d 289, 291. Cf. Plymale v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 201 So.2d 85, 86.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S JUNE 30, 2000 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,322
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,262
<PP&E>                                         446,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                 217,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 434,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,934
<BONDS>                                        470,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                   (136,776)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   434,099
<SALES>                                         30,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,927
<CGS>                                           36,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,595
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,322
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,205)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6046

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENNETH WAYNE MCLEOD, a/k/a Killer, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-98-306, CA-00-1215-1) Submitted: May 21, 2002 Decided: June 10, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Wayne McLeod, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Wayne McLeod seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McLeod , Nos. CR-98-306; CA00-1215-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2



Certification



I, J. van den Belt, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2002 (as amended, the Annual Report) of Océ N.V.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, the Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: September 23, 2003



By:

/s/    J. VAN DEN BELTName: J. van den Belt Title: Chief
Financial Officer and member of the Board of Executive Directors
#### John J. MACKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-150.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 27, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00188-CV 

JEFFORY G. SNOWDEN, Appellant 

V. 

BRIAN RAVKIND, TRACY EDMONDSON GAMBLE D/B/A FRISCO STRONG, 

AND MEGAN DEWOLFE, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 366-02116-2018 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Molberg 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

 Before the Court is the motion of Jeffory G. Snowden for an extension of time to file a 

petition for permissive appeal. Snowden seeks permission to appeal the trial court’s order signed 

on January 10, 2020. A petition for permissive appeal must be filed within fifteen days after the 

date the order to be appealed is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(c). An extension of time may be 

granted if the party files the petition within fifteen days after the deadline and files a motion for 

extension. See id. 28.3(d)(1)-(2). 

 The petition for permissive appeal was due on January 25, 2020. See id. 28.3(c). Snowden 

filed a timely extension motion on February 10, 2020. See id. 4.1(a), 28.3. However, he filed the 

petition for permissive appeal on February 11, 2020, one day past the fifteen-day grace period. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we deny the motion for an extension of time to file the petition for permissive appeal 

and dismiss the petition for permissive appeal as untimely. 

200188F.P05 

/Robert D. Burns, III/ 

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### In re ECM, a child.

No. K-500.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

May 20, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                         259,503
<SECURITIES>                                    11,088
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,211,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                   190,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,271,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,958,620
<PP&E>                                      16,259,192
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,237,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,016,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,695,704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,038
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,882,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,016,785
<SALES>                                     14,272,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,272,022
<CGS>                                       12,203,377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,203,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               190,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             181,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                222,755
<INCOME-TAX>                                    86,055
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            136,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   136,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>