alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PAGE 1 OF 1

www.epa.gov/ozone/snap

INVITATION: FIRE PROTECTION SECTOR 

STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP

Hosted By: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Air and

Radiation, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Stratospheric Protection Division

Date: December 2, 2015

Time: 1:30 – 3:00 p.m. (please plan to arrive by 1:00 p.m. to sign in)

Location: EPA, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20004, EPA East 

Room 4225

Background: EPA hosted a meeting on September 11, 2015, for interested stakeholders 

to exchange information on the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. 

During the past 12 months, EPA has taken four separate actions under the SNAP 

program, to support the President’s June 2013 Climate Action Plan, which directs EPA to

“use its authority through the Significant New Alternatives Policy Program to encourage 

private sector investment in low-emissions technology by identifying and approving 

climate-friendly chemicals while prohibiting certain uses of the most harmful chemical 

alternatives.” As part of SNAP’s continuing efforts, we are hosting this workshop which 

will concentrate on the fire protection sector.

Logistics: Please RSVP by November 25th to Paul-Harvey Weiner with a direct reply to 

this e-mail (weiner.paul-harvey@epa.gov) or by telephone at (202) 343-9740. Please 

include your name and affiliation. You are welcome to share this invitation with other 

interested participants; however, please ask them to RSVP by November 25th as well. We 

look forward to a productive and informative meeting.
5 May 2016

Mr. Steven Niedzielski 5047 E. Roy Rogers Road Cave Creek, AZ 85331

Dear Mr. Niedzielski :

This is in response to your September 10 , 2015

, letter posted to the docket ( FAA−2015− 38 22 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption

from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR)

. You requested to conduct promotional photography and videography services using an unmanned aerial system

.

The information you submitted did not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81. On

November 24 , 2015 , the FAA sent you a letter stating that we were unable to process your request without further information. Specifically, we asked you t o provide the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek rel ief and the extent of the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

On April 11 , 2015 , the FAA received additional information. T he FAA has reviewed the information and finds that you did not provide the sections from which you seek relief , how granting the request would provide a level of safety and why granting the request would be in the public interest.2

Because your petition l acks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has close d your exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information

, please resubmit your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

\ s \

Lirio Liu

Director

, Office of Rulemaking
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 34578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 6, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior 
Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Richard Franke, Bayview, Texas, and Dennis Franke, Brownsville, 
Texas, individually, to acquire voting shares of Laguna Madre 
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire shares of First 
National Bank of South Padre Island, Texas. In addition, The McDaniel 
Nevada Irrevocable Trust, Fort Worth, Texas, Barbara McDaniel, Fort 
Worth, Texas, Trustee for The McDaniel Nevada Irrevocable Trust, the 
Estate of Melvin H. Chapman, South Padre Island, Texas, Stewart 
Chapman, Wichita Falls, Texas, Executor for the Estate of Melvin H. 
Chapman, Trevor Franke, Frisco, Texas, Denise Franke Yeary, Dallas, 
Texas, Richard Franke, Jr., John P. Franke, and Kevin C. Franke, all of 
Bayview, Texas; to retain shares and to join a group acting in concert 
to retain shares of Laguna Madre Bancshares, Inc.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 16, 2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-15472 Filed 7-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
## NO. 12-09-00196-CV IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEXA S ABD OU LI E SARR , § APP EAL FRO

M T HE 2 41 ST APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRI CT COURT OF BAN K O F AME

RICA , APP ELL EE § SMI TH CO UN TY

, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM Th is a pp e a l is be ing dis mis se d for fai lu re to c omp ly w ith the Te xa s Ru le s o f A pp e llate Procedur e. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3. Pursuant to R ule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing stateme nt was due to have been f

iled at the time the appe al was pe rfe cted, i.e., June 26, 2009. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 32.1. On June 26, 2009 , t h i s co u rt notified Appellant that he should file a docke ting statement immediately if he ha d not alrea dy done so. On the same date, by se parate letter, this court notified Appellant that the f

iling fee wa s due on or be fore July 6, 2009. Because Appe l l an t d i d not file the docke ting statement as re quested in our June 26, 2009 letter , th is c o u r t i s s u e d a s e c o n d n o ti c e o n J u ly 7 , 2 0 0 9 a d v is in g A p p e ll a n t th a t th e d o c k eting statement wa s past due. The notice also advised Appellant that the fil ing fee in the appea l was due to have been paid on or before July 6, 2009, but had not been r ece ived. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5. The notice further provide d that unless the docke ting statement and fili ng fee wer e filed on or befor e July 17, 2009, the appea l would be pre sented for dismiss al in acc ordanc e wit h Texa s Rule of Appellate Proc edure 42.3. The da te for f iling the docketing statement and the filing fee ha ve passe d, and Appellant has not c omplied w ith the court’s reque st. Because Appellant has f ailed, af ter notice , to c omp ly w ith Rul e s 5 a nd32 .1 , th e app e a l is dismiss ed

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c)

. Opinion delivere d July 24, 2009. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(PUBLISH)
260 La. 704

#### Phillip Carl PRUDHOMME v. CAMUS ELECTRIC COMPANY et al.

No. 52097.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 11, 1972.

In re: Camus Electric Company, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company applying for Certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 256 So.2d 364.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                    GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                      Nine months ended September 27, 1997

                                   (Unaudited)



(In millions)

Earnings:
   Earnings before income taxes                                   $669
   Fixed charges:
     Minority interest in net earnings of
       consolidated subsidiaries (1)                                62
     Interest expense                                               35
                                                                  ----
                                                                  $766
                                                                  ====

Fixed charges:
   Minority interest in net earnings of
     consolidated subsidiaries (2)                                $ 86
   Interest expense                                                 35
                                                                  ----
                                                                  $121
                                                                  ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                6.33
                                                                  ====


(1)  Minority  interest in net earnings of  consolidated  subsidiaries  includes
     dividends on subsidiary's preferred stock.

(2)  The  fixed  charges  amount  for  minority  interest  in  net  earnings  of
     consolidated subsidiaries represents the pretax earnings amount which would
     be required to cover such fixed charges as calculated below:


                Subsidiary's Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
                -------------------------------------------------
                             100% - Income Tax Rate

     The  income  tax rate is based on the  relationship  of the  provision  for
     income taxes to earnings before income taxes for the respective period.


                                        7
Exhibit 99.1

Financial statement schedule

Rule 12-09. Valuation and qualifying accounts.

YEAR ENDED 6/30/01

|                                |  |   |           | Column CAdditions |   |         |  |  
|------------------------------- |  | - | --------- | ------------------ | - | ------- |  | -
|
|
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $ | 2,046,015 |                    | $ | 512,363 |  | $

YEAR ENDED 6/30/02

|                                |  |   |           | Column CAdditions |   |         |  |  
|------------------------------- |  | - | --------- | ------------------ | - | ------- |  | -
|
|
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $ | 1,050,000 |                    | $ | 200,000 |  | $

YEAR ENDED 6/30/03

|                                |  |   |           | Column CAdditions |   |         |  |  
|------------------------------- |  | - | --------- | ------------------ | - | ------- |  | -
|
|
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $ | 1,250,000 |                    | $ | 672,000 |  | $

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 10.29


                                     July 14, 2001

                            Re: Non-Negotiable Promissory Notes
                                 dated as of July 14, 1998

     To the individuals on the attached distribution list:

     In connection with the  above-referenced  Promissory  Notes between each of
you as the Maker and  Sandata,  Inc.  as the Payee,  please be advised  that the
Payee has agreed to extend the due date of such Promissory Notes for one hundred
twenty (120) days until November 11, 2001.  Interest shall continue to accrue at
the current  rate and all other terms and  conditions  of the  Promissory  Notes
shall continue until such date.

                                     Very truly yours,

                                     Sandata, Inc.
                                     By:



                                     /s/Bert E. Brodsky
                                     Bert E. Brodsky, Chairman


<PAGE>
DISTRIBUTION:

Mr. Bert E. Brodsky
26 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY  11050

Mr. Hugh Freund
26 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY  11050

Ms. Carol Freund
26 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY  11050

Mr. Gary Stoller
26 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY  11050

Mr. Gerald Shapiro
26 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY  11050

Mr. Paul Konigsberg
440 Park Avenue South
New York, NY  10016
#### Antoinette Middleton, Respondent, v John Luther and Son et al., Defendants, and John W. Robertson et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[656 NYS2d 1021]

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, cross motions granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting the motion of plaintiff *954for an extension of time to file a note of issue and in denying the cross motions of defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to serve a note of issue within 90 days after having been served with 90-day notices pursuant to CPLR 3216. Plaintiff was required to file a note of issue or to move before the default date either to extend the 90-day period or to vacate the notices *(see, Spierto v Pennisi,*223 AD2d 537, 538), but plaintiff failed to do so. In order to avoid dismissal, plaintiff was required to demonstrate both a justifiable excuse for the failure to respond to the demands and a meritorious cause of action *(see,*CPLR 3216 [e]). Plaintiff failed to provide a reasonable excuse for her inactivity during the four years since the commencement of the action *(see, Terry v Southern Container,*214 AD2d 983; *Richter v Dunlap,*214 AD2d 983, 984). The affidavit of plaintiff’s counsel, containing conclusory statements concerning the complexity of the case, does not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay.

In light of our conclusion that the court abused its discretion in denying defendants’ cross motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216, the court’s subsequent order granting plaintiff additional time to conduct discovery and to file a note of issue must be vacated. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Major, J.—Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Green, J. P., Doerr, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         111,793
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               281,188
<PP&E>                                         848,112
<DEPRECIATION>                               (498,448)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 663,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           849
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,379,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   663,773
<SALES>                                        295,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               295,643
<CGS>                                           84,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               211,466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,469
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (148,487)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            255,956
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   255,956
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section** **1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section** **906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alexander H. Good, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

|                          |                                  |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| /s/ Alexander H. Good

  |
| Name:                         | Alexander H. Good                     |
| Title:                        | Chief Executive Officer and President |

May 8, 2009
<PAGE>
 
 SUMMIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.                                       EXHIBIT 11.1
Computation of Earnings Per Share
(Unaudited)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                                 March 31,
                                                            1997         1996
                                                                      (RESTATED)  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>    
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:                               
 Weighted average shares outstanding                    10,347,575    8,503,767
 Net effect of dilutive stock options--based              
  on the treasury stock method                                   -            -
                                                       ------------------------
                                                        10,347,575    8,503,767
                                                       ========================
  Net loss                                             $(4,498,047)  $ (251,404)
                                                       ========================

  Net loss per share                                   $     (0.43)  $    (0.03)
                                                       ========================


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
 Weighted average shares outstanding                    10,347,575    8,503,767
 Net effect of dilutive stock options--based
  on the treasury stock method                                   -            -
                                                       ------------------------
                                                        10,347,575    8,503,767
                                                       ========================
  Net loss                                             $(4,498,047)  $ (251,404)
                                                       ========================


  Net loss per share                                   $     (0.43)  $    (0.03)
                                                       ========================
</TABLE> 

                                    Page 14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      13,926,666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              174,121,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                378,207,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           570,610,653
<PP&E>                                     473,913,557
<DEPRECIATION>                            (37,571,926)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,095,508,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      223,005,375
<BONDS>                                    495,671,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,701
<COMMON>                                       304,791
<OTHER-SE>                                 375,744,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,095,508,365
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,047,060,694
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            3,016,881,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,289,825<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          25,495,361
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,393,552
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,454,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,938,759
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (335,362)<F2>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
<FN>
<F1>NET OF OTHER INCOME
<F2>NET LOSS AVAILABLE FOR COMMON STOCKHOLDERS AFTER $2,274,121 PREFERRED
STOCK DIVIDENDS
<F3>REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          54,006
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,555,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,967,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,413,770
<PP&E>                                      13,190,461
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,186,524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,265,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,598,927
<BONDS>                                        724,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   (147,686)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,265,157
<SALES>                                     11,793,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,793,252
<CGS>                                        6,185,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,450,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               889,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             889,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                542,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (195,177)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            738,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                186,758
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   924,782
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .005
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .005


</TABLE>