alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 24(b)




                 JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

      John Hancock Variable Annuity and Variable Life Insurance Accounts

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY



     The undersigned member of the board of Directors of John Hancock Variable 
Life Insurance Company does hereby constitute and appoint Henry D. Shaw, Ronald 
J. Bocage, Thomas J. Lee, Sandra M. DaDalt and Laura L. Mangan, and each of them
individually, with full power of substitution, his or her true and lawful 
attorneys and agents to execute, in the name of, and on behalf of, the 
undersigned as a member of said Board of Directors, the Registration Statements 
under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and 
each amendment to the Registration Statements, to be filed for John Hancock
Variable Life Account V, John Hancock Variable Annuity Account I and any other
variable annuity or variable life insurance account of John Hancock Variable
Life Insurance Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to take
any and all action and to execute in the name of, and on behalf of, the
undersigned as a member of said Board of Directors or otherwise any and all
instruments, including applications for exemptions from such Acts, which said
attorneys and agents deem necessary or advisable to enable any variable annuity
or variable life insurance account of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance
Company to comply with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the rules, regulations and requirements of
the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereof; and the undersigned
hereby ratifies and confirms as his or her own act and deed all that each of
said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to have done by virtue hereof. Each
of said attorneys and agents shall have, and may exercise, all of the powers
hereby conferred.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his or her hand on the
date shown.

                                             
       1/13/97                                   /S/ Ronald J. Bocage
     -------------                            --------------------------
     Date                                     Director
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


                                                                 August 16, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebLink Wireless, Inc. (the
"company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), pursuant
to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Kelly W. Prentiss,
Chief Financial Officer of WebLink Wireless, Inc., certify that, to the best of
my knowledge:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
company.




                             /s/ KELLY W. PRENTISS
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Kelly W. Prentiss
                             V.P., Finance Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                             August 16, 2002
#### James Warren ENNIS v. Anthony J. GREZIK.

No. 38544.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
----

**EXHIBIT****23.1**

June 29, 2010

**PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL**

The Board of DirectorsChina Nutrifruit Group Limited5th Floor, Chuangye Building,Chuangye Plaza, Industrial Zone 3, Daqing Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163316The People's Republic of China****Dear Sirs, 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-162916) and on Form S-8 (No.333-162915) of China Nutrifruit Group Limited (the "Company") and itssubsidiaries of our report dated June 29, 2010 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of the Company, which appears in Form 10-K of the Companyfor the year ended March 31, 2010.

Yours faithfully,

/s/ HLB Hodgson Impley Cheng             HLB Hodgson Impley Cheng

----
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Elliott Harvey d/b/a * From the 259th District Court

Pioneer Naturals Pet Foods, of Jones County,

 Trial Court No. 023133.

Vs. No. 11-15-00222-CV * October 12, 2023

Advanced Marketing Group, LLC, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal 

is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party 

incurring same.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS, L.P. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998. INFORMATION IS ONLY INCLUDED FOR OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS L.P.
(A REGISTRANT) AND DOES NOT INCLUDE INFORMATION FOR OLYMPUS CAPITAL CORP., WHICH
HAS NO OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000861255
<NAME> OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          44,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,407<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         355,470<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,011,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        726,982
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (135,947)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,011,999
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,642
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,959)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       115
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,074)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES NET OF ALLOWANCE
<F2>PP&E NET OF DEPRECIATION
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Edward WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Minnie Ferguson WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10861.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Sept. 25, 1967.

*92Hendrick, Fant, Sexton & Bain, Shreveport, for appellant.

George T. Anderson, Jr., Shreveport, for appellee.

Before GLADNEY, BOLIN and BAR-HAM, JJ.

BARHAM, Judge.

Edward Williams sued his wife, Minnie Ferguson Williams, for a separation, alleging abandonment. Mrs. Williams answered and reconvened alleging numerous acts of cruelty as giving her good cause to leave her husband and, as a basis for a separation, judgment in her favor. The trial court rejected the husband’s demands and granted the wife a decree of separation with an award of alimony pendente lite in the sum of $50.00 per month.

Plaintiff, defendant in reconvention, appealed, specifying error of the lower court in granting the wife the decree of separation, and, alternatively, that the sum of $50.00 per month is excessive.

The case presents only a factual question. The trial judge in oral reasons for judgment found a continuing relationship between Mr. Williams and a neighbor of such a nature as to cause aggravation and concern to the wife. The court also concluded that the husband had ordered the wife to leave the matrimonial domicile, and that although he recanted to some degree and in some manner prior to the separation, it was too late to absolve him of fault.

The trial judge found the cause of the separation to be the ill treatment of the wife by the husband. This Court has no reason to overrule the factual findings of the lower court in this regard. The Court further finds that the trial judge’s award of alimony pendente lite is not excessive.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed and the costs of this appeal are to be paid by the appellant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by rference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,361,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,473,897
<PP&E>                                       1,239,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,971,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,269,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,463
<COMMON>                                        11,938
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,689,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,971,514
<SALES>                                      2,166,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,166,667
<CGS>                                          766,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,006,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,747,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,386,699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,386,699)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,386,699)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)



</TABLE>
#### DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida et al., Petitioners, v. EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Respondent.

No. 37239.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 19, 1968.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., Stuart Simon, Gerald T. Wetherington and John G. Fletcher, Asst. County Attys., for petitioners.

*8Gambrell, Russell, Moye & Killorin, Theodore M. Forbes, Atlanta, Ga., William G. Bell, Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, for respondent.

Scott, McCarthy, Steel, Hector & Davis and Phillip Goldman, Miami, amicus curiae, National Airlines, Inc.

Smathers & Thompson, amicus curiae, Pan American World Airways, Inc.

John H. Wahl, Jr., Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Miami, Ma-honey, Hadlow, Chambers & Adams, Nathan H. Wilson, Jacksonville, and Rexford L. Hawkins, Atlanta, Ga., amicus curiae, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari has issued in this cause pursuant to certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, under Article 5, Section 4(2), of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. and Rule 4.5, subd. c (6), 32 F.S.A., Florida Appellate Rules. The case was certified to this Court as presenting a question of great public interest “in that the decision affects the payment of taxes and discounts thereon.” Based upon such certification we issued the writ.

We conclude that the District Court of Appeal reached the correct conclusion in its decision of this cause. The majority opinion of that Court, Fla.App., 207 So.2d 13, is adopted as our opinion herein, and its judgment as the judgment of this Court, and we hold that the writ heretofore issued should be discharged.

Petitioners (defendants below) have filed a motion herein to strike the amicus curiae brief of National Air Lines, Inc., and the appendix attached thereto, on the ground that they attempt to interject in these proceedings matters dehors the record herein. We are of the opinion that the motion is well founded and should be granted, and it is so ordered, Keating, etc. v. State of Florida ex rel. Ausebel, Fla.App., 157 So.2d 567.

The writ of certiorari hitherto issued herein is discharged.

CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, THOR-NAL and ERVIN, JJ., and MASON, Circuit Judge, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-27-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           14,949
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     2,834
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 18,561
<CASH>                                         260
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             2,963
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,726
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                14,860

<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            1,567
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          1,681
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                556
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    150
<COMMON>                                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,726
<PREMIUMS>                                     2,641
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            470
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             216
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 61
<BENEFITS>                                     1,873
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    662
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                557
<INCOME-TAX>                                   156
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            401
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Merchants and
Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. on the basis of such officers knowledge and belief for the sole
purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION I, James C. Mroczkowski, Chief Financial Officer of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation,
Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (1) The Annual Report of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. /s/ James C. Mroczkowski
Name: James C. Mroczkowski
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 16, 2005
256 La. 626

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph D. ABSHIRE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50747.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 21, 1970.

In re: Joseph D. Abshire applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.

is of the opinion that the trial court should be ordered to hold an evidentiary hearing under the allegations of the application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DAY
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,511
<PP&E>                                          44,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,234
<BONDS>                                        250,306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           33,146
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (87,551)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,835
<SALES>                                         43,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,137
<CGS>                                           26,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,804)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,563)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,552
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Elaine I. MIDGLEY, Appellant, v. Jack MIDGLEY, Appellee.

No. 73-19.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 14, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
HCFC Transfer Documents

1.) Arkema Transfers 2.) Solvay Transfers 3.) CBI Placeholder for Coolgas In vestment Property Transfers
#### Jo Anne POERSCHKE et al., Petitioners, v. Frances FANDREY, Respondent.

No. 44544.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 5, 1974.

Certiorari denied, Fla.App., 290 So.2d 492.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### CHOCTAWHATCHEE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. MOORE.

No. 38572.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 220 So.2d 20.
Capital-Plus Partners, LLC.

A FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY

__________________________________________________________________________________________

7620 Olentangy River Road

Columbus, Ohio 43235

614) 848-7620 / 841-3856 Fax





CERTIFICATE  OF  RESOLUTION

OF  THE  DIRECTORS  OF



LBO Capital Corp.





Mario DiNello

, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected

COO



( Name )



( Title )

of

LBO Capital Corp.

, aColoradocorporation/organization , and that at



( Company )

( State )

a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of said corporation held on the 12Day of  March, 2009

,



( Date )



pursuant to a signed Waiver of Notice , at which meeting a quorum was present and acting throughout ,



the following resolution was adopted :



RESOLVED , that the

COO

of this Corporation ,

( Title )

Mario DiNello

,and his  successors is hereby  authorized

( Name )

to   enter  into  a  Factoring  Agreement  with  Security  Agreement   with



Capital-Plus Partners, LLC. and to execute any documents  necessary  to

effectuate the terms of the above Agreement with Capital-Plus Partners, LLC.



/S/ Mario DiNello



( Signature )

Dated this

12

Day of

March

, 2009





As witnessed by:

___Anastasiya Gurevich_____________________ Title:__Accounting assistant_____

Signature:

____/s/ __Anastasiya Gurevich_________  Date:__12 March 2009______



STATE  OF

)

)      ss.

COUNTY  OF

)



On this 12 day of March, A.D. , 2009  before me , a Notary Public ,

personally appeared Mario DiNello , COO of ,

( Name )

( Title )

LBO Capital Corp. ,

COcorporation/organization , who being by me duly

( Company )

( State )

sworn , did say that  he executed the same as the free act and  deed  of  said  Corporation

and by authority of the Board of Directors thereof .

Tatsiana Husarava



Notary Public



Oakland

County , State  of

MI













MY COMMISSION EXPIRES :

07/15/2014





CERTRESO.DOC 09/10/92.