alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23


             Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

 We have issued our report dated October 5, 2005, accompanying the
 consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of VPGI
 Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005.  We hereby consent to
 the incorporation by reference of said report in the following Registration
 Statements of VPGI Corp.:

 Form S-3 (File No. 333-97809 effective August 13, 2002);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-68326 effective August 13, 2002);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-62680 effective July 13, 2001);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-47692 effective October 25, 2000);
 Form S-8 (File No. 333-39358 effective June 15, 2000);
 Form S-3 (File No. 333-31952 effective March 21, 2000);
 Form S-2 (File No. 333-06447 effective September 30, 1996).


 /s/  CF & Co., L.L.P.


 CF & Co., L.L.P.

 Dallas, Texas
 October 5, 2005
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1046 

To clarify certain provisions of the Native American Veterans’ Memorial 

Establishment Act of 1994. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2013 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. TESTER, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify certain provisions of the Native American 

Veterans’ Memorial Establishment Act of 1994. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Vet5 erans’ Memorial Amendments Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIVE AMERICAN VETERANS’ MEMORIAL. 

7 (a) AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.—Section 

8 3 of the Native American Veterans’ Memorial Establish9 ment Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 80q–5 note; 108 Stat. 4067) 

10 is amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1046 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘within the in2 terior structure of the facility’’ and inserting ‘‘on the 

3 property’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘, in con5 sultation with the Museum, is’’ and inserting ‘‘and 

6 the National Museum of the American Indian are’’. 

7 (b) PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—Section 4(a) of the 

8 Native American Veterans’ Memorial Establishment Act 

9 of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 80q–5 note; 108 Stat. 4067) is amend10 ed— 

11 (1) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘AND NA12 TIONAL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN ’’ after 

13 ‘‘AMERICAN INDIANS ’’; and 

14 (2) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘shall be 

15 solely’’ and inserting ‘‘and the National Museum of 

16 the American Indian shall be’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.4


 


AMERICAN
ACQUISITION OPPORTUNITY INC.


12115
Visionary Way


Fishers,
Indiana


 


March
17, 2021


 


American
Resources Corporation


12115
Visionary Way


Fishers,
Indiana


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the
registration statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the
“IPO”) of the securities of American Acquisition Opportunity Inc. (the “Company”)
and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination (a “Business
Combination”) or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement)
(such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), American Resources Corporation
(“ARC”) shall make available to the Company certain office space, utilities, and secretarial, administrative
and consulting services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 12115 Visionary Way, Fishers, Indiana
(or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay ARC a sum equal to $10,000 per month, commencing on
the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. ARC agrees that payment of such amounts may be
deferred, without interest, until the date of consummation by the Company of the initial Business Combination upon a determination
by the Company’s audit committee that the Company lacks sufficient funds held outside the Trust Account (as defined below)
to pay the Company’s actual or anticipated expenses in connection with the Company’s initial Business Combination.
ARC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside
in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established by the Company for the benefit of the
Company’s public stockholders upon the consummation of the IPO as described in the Registration Statement (“Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements
with the Company in connection with this letter agreement and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason
whatsoever.


 


	Very truly yours,
	 
	AMERICAN ACQUISITION OPPORTUNITY INC.
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Mark C. Jensen	 
	Name: 	Mark C. Jensen	
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	
	 	 
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	 
	AMERICAN RESOURCES CORPORATION
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Thomas M. Sauve	 
	Name:	Thomas M. Sauve	 
	Title:	President
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 118 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 118

    To require the Commodity Credit Corporation to refund to first 
processors of sugarcane and sugar beets marketing assessments collected 
  by the Corporation during fiscal year 1991, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Commodity Credit Corporation to refund to first 
processors of sugarcane and sugar beets marketing assessments collected 
  by the Corporation during fiscal year 1991, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REFUND OF SUGAR MARKETING ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED DURING 
              FISCAL YEAR 1991.

    Notwithstanding section 206(i) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (as 
added by section 1105(c) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 
1990 (Public Law 101-508)), the Commodity Credit Corporation shall 
refund to first processors of sugarcane and sugar beets marketing 
assessments collected by the Corporation from the processors in 
accordance with such section 206(i) during the period beginning July 1, 
1991, and ending September 30, 1991.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


___________________________________________





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of The First
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, DeeDee Lowery, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      DeeDee LoweryName:
                    DeeDee
      LoweryTitle:
                    Executive
      Vice President and ChiefFinancial
      OfficerDate:
                    November
      13, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to The First Bancshares, Inc., and will be
retained by The First Bancshares, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Ralph R. GOODMAN and Leonard Feldman, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 71-166, 71-167.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 4, 1972.

Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These appeals, consolidated for appellate purposes, are from an order denying each defendant’s motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Rule 3.850 CrPR, 33 F.S. A., following an evidentiary hearing by the trial court.

From our consideration of appellant’s motion, the entire record on appeal, briefs and argument of counsel, we have reached the conclusion that there was no basis upon which the trial judge should have granted the motion, therefore, his action in denying the motion was proper. No reversible error having been demonstrated the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### L. A. PIERCE and Betty J. Pierce, his wife, Appellants, v. Essie G. COMPTON, Appellee.

No. 71-206.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 20, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 12

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO					18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO					SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Volvo Corporation (the "company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

- The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
Date: 30 May 2003 Name: Leif Johansson Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: 30 May 2003 Name: Stefan Johnsson Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

*** * ***

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Volvo Corporation and will be retained by Volvo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

*** * ***

**In accordance with the interim guidance for Section 906 certification issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003 in Release No. 33-8212, this certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Volvo Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

83 FR 32932, 16 July 2018.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

 Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

 The following item will not be considered during the Open Meeting on Wednesday, July 18, 2018:
      - Whether to propose amendments to the disclosure requirements in Rule 3-10 and Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: July 18, 2018.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-15673 Filed 7-18-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 21, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130583 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130583 

 COA: 262770 

Oakland CC: 98-158180-FC 

SAMUEL LEE DENARD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 6, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

d0614 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 21, 2006 

Clerk
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00422-CR

BENJAMIN MAURINE SADLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 183rd District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1382570).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on May 6, 

2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible 

error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered August 28, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Massengale.
#### Todd Johnson et al., Respondents, v Lawrence Phelan et al., Appellants.

[721 NYS2d 378]

—In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated March 16, 2000, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and on their counterclaims, and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion *395for summary judgment on the complaint and, in effect, to dismiss the counterclaims.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the cross motion is denied, the complaint is dismissed, the notice of pendency is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for entry of an appropriate judgment.

The Supreme Court erred in concluding that the plaintiff purchasers were entitled to specific performance of the installment contract in this case. Before specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property may be granted, a plaintiff must demonstrate that it substantially performed its contractual obligations and that it is ready, willing, and able to satisfy those obligations not yet performed, regardless of any alleged anticipatory breach by the defendant (see, *Bowen v Horgan,*259 NY 267, 269; *Petrelli Assocs. v*Germano, 268 AD2d 513). It is undisputed that the purchasers defaulted in making the annual installment payments required under the contract. The purchasers’ failure to do so constituted a material breach of the agreement precluding them from obtaining specific performance (see, *Grace v Nappa,*46 NY2d 560, 567; *Hooker v Wooten,*237 AD2d 572). The purchasers also failed to demonstrate that they were ready, willing, and able to perform and had the funds necessary to purchase the property (see, *Petrelli Assocs. v Germano,*supra;*Ober v Bey,*266 AD2d 441; *Goller Place Corp. v Cacase,*251 AD2d 287). Accordingly, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Under the circumstance of this case, the Supreme Court also erred in denying summary judgment to the defendants on their counterclaims for ejectment and a declaration that the installment contract was null and void *(cf., Heritage Art Galleries v Raia,*173 AD2d 441, 442; *Bean v Walker,*95 AD2d 70). Goldstein, J. P., Florio, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 46



		

			Exhibit 4.6

		




		
			
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			March 23, 2021
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Securities and Exchange Commission 
		

		
			100 F Street, NE
		

		
			Washington, D.C. 20549
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Re: CF Bankshares Inc.—Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Ladies and Gentlemen:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			CF Bankshares Inc., a Delaware  corporation, is today filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") its Annual Report on Form 10-K of CF Bankshares Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
		

		
			Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, CF Bankshares Inc. hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to CF Bankshares Inc.’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  None of such long-term debt exceeds 10% of the total assets of CF Bankshares Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
		

		
			Very truly yours,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			CF BANKSHARES INC.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			/s/Timothy T. O’Dell
		

		
			Timothy T. O’Dell
		

		
			President and Chief Executive Officer
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 10 - 00016 - CR

DAVID WILLIAM APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------ FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant David William pled guilty pursuant to a plea bargain to burglary of a habitation. The trial court placed him on four years’ deferred adjudication community supervision. A lmost seven months later, the State filed a petition to adjudicate, alleging several violations , including the commission of a new offense . Appellant pled “not true” to all allegations. After an adjudication hearing, the trial court found many of the all egations , including that regarding the

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

commission of a new offense, true. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Appellan t to eight years’ confinement. Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel avers that, in his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief
and motion meet the re quirements of Anders v. California 2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 3 This court afforded Appellant the opportunity to file a brief on his own behalf, but he did not. Once a n appellant’s court

- appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders , we are obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record to see if there is any arguable grou nd that may be raised on his behalf. 4 Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 5 We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in

2 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

3 See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510

– 11 & n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

4 See id. at 511.

5 See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).3

the r ecord that might arguably support the appeal. 6 Consequently, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )
DELIVERED: December 16, 2010

6 See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       6,597,807
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,790,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 40,313,309
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      17,498,191
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        17,676,919
<LOANS>                                    145,433,896
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,335,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             229,585,976
<DEPOSITS>                                 195,085,329
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,596,601
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,700,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,403,974
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,352,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             229,585,976
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             12,901,162
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,302,313
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               352,521
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            16,555,996
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,111,966
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,398,473
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        9,157,523
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   98,043
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              76,842
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,830,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,600,402
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,600,402
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,021,012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.87
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,022,683
<LOANS-PAST>                                   258,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,227,411
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,744,335
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  175,834
<RECOVERIES>                                    40,873
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,335,788
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,335,788
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>