alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1 
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             917,978
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,518,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (82,445) 
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,797,404
<PP&E>                                           2,267,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (349,575)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,743,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,985,676
<BONDS>                                         10,826,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           306,968
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,514,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,743,122
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,688,120
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,764,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,278,507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,354,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,743,122
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (19,354,819)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (619,252)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2023164EN.01003501.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2023 — Basaglia v Commission

(Case T-597/21) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents concerning various projects in the context of the eTEN programmes and of the fifth and sixth framework programmes for research and technological development - Partial refusal to grant access - Unavailability of documents - Unilateral restriction of the scope of the request for access - Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination - Unreasonable workload - Article 266 TFEU - Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court - Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment)

(2023/C 164/47)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Basaglia (Milan, Italy) (represented by: G. Balossi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2021) 5741 final of 27 July 2021 concerning a confirmatory application for access to documents.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Giorgio Basaglia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Giorgio Basaglia to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 15.11.2021.

---
## RINEHART LAW OFFICES Rusty Rinehart Attorneys and Counselors at Law 2105 S. Bascom Ave., Suite 360 Campbell, CA 95008 rusty@rinehartlaw.com

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin DOT, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building Ground Floor Room E12-320 WashingtonD.C. 20590 March 15, 2012

RE: FAA v. Ed Staub & Sons Petroleum, Inc. FAA Case No. 2010S070080 DearJudge Goodwin:
-, ·, :'' , I, Telephone: (408) 871-2696 Facsimile: (408) 871-2757

Pleasebe advised tha\:theabovereferenced case has settled and the defendant, Ed Staub and Sorts Petroleum; Inc. is withdrawing its request for a hearing on the matter.

.., t

Attorney forEdStaub and Sons Petroleum, Inc.
CC: Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-430 WilberWright Building, Suite 2W1000 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington D.C. 20591 

# RECEIVED 'MAR 22_ 2012 

# HEARING DOCKET
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rare Medium Group, Inc.:

The audit referred to in our report dated March 29, 1999, included the related
financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998,
included in the annual report on Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audit. In our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos.
33-37036, 33-37037, 33-85634, 33-85636, 33-89122 and 33-89124 on Form S-8, of
our reports dated March 29, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheet as
of December 31, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit), cash flows and financial statement schedule for
the year then ended which reports are included in the annual report on Form
10-K. Our report dated March 29, 1999, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered net losses and losses from continuing
operations, has a working capital deficiency, and has incurred losses through
December 31, 1998. These factors, raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of that uncertainty.

                                                      KPMG LLP
New York, New York
March 29, 1999







                                       32
#### Clifton STAPLETON v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 62517.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Travelers Insurance Company, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of LaSalle. 359 So.2d 1051.

Writ denied.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1008 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from implementing proposed 

policy changes that would permit passengers to carry small, non-locking 

knives on aircraft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from implementing proposed policy changes that would permit passengers to carry small, non-locking knives on aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Knives Out of 

5 Our Skies Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1008 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICY 

2 CHANGE TO PERMIT SMALL, NON-LOCKING 

3 KNIVES ON AIRCRAFT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, on and after the date of the enactment of 

6 this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security may not im7 plement any change to the prohibited items list of the 

8 Transportation Security Administration that would permit 

9 passengers to carry small, non-locking knives through pas10 senger screening checkpoints at airports, into sterile areas 

11 at airports, or on board passenger aircraft. 

12 (b) PROHIBITED ITEMS LIST DEFINED.—In this sec13 tion, the term ‘‘prohibited items list’’ means the list of 

14 items passengers are prohibited from carrying as acces15 sible property or on their persons through passenger 

16 screening checkpoints at airports, into sterile areas at air17 ports, and on board passenger aircraft pursuant to section 

18 1540.111 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (as in 

19 effect on January 1, 2013). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Gregg F. Stewart,  Chief  Financial  Officer of NuCo2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended  September 30,
2002 of the Company (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                 /s/ Gregg F. Stewart
                                                 -------------------------
                                                 Gregg F. Stewart
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 November 14, 2002
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 15, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City*                     (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

                    1.                     *Bern Bancshares, Inc., Bern, Kansas;*                     to acquire 6.5 percent of the voting shares of UBT Bancshares, Inc., Marysville, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire United Bank & Trust, Marysville, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 16, 2018.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-15471 Filed 7-19-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
#### BENSON *v.*WAYNE CIRCUIT JUDGE.

1. Justices op Peace — Appeal—Defective Return — Amended Return — Dismissal op Appeal — Abuse op Discretion.

Where, on appeal from justice’s court, justice failed to return any pleadings, as required by 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 16233, and, although appellant knew of said omission, he failed to procure amended return under sections 16236, 16237, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing permission to file pleadings four days before ease was to be heard, and dismissing appeal.

2. Mandamus — Dismissal op Appeal — Delay.

Mandamus will not issue to compel circuit court to set aside order dismissing appeal from justice’s court because of justice’s defective return, where petition for mandamus was not filed until eight months after appeal had been dismissed, and hearing thereon was not brought on until two years after order to show cause was issued.

Mandamus by Edward H. Benson to compel DeWitt H. Merriam, Wayne circuit judge, to vacate an order dismissing appeal from justice’s court.

Submitted October 20, 1931.

(Calendar No. 34,685.)

Writ denied January 4, 1932.

*Henry R. MacGillis,*for plaintiff.

*Frank P. Darin (Harold Goodman, of*counsel), for defendant.

*437Fead, J.

In his return on appeal to circuit court, a justice of the peace failed to state or return any pleadings, oral or written, as required by 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 16233. Plaintiff here, appellant there, knew at once of the omission, took no steps to procure an amended return under 3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 16236, 16237, but a month later, four days before the case was to be heard, moved the circuit court to permit pleadings to be filed. There was a dispute whether there had been any pleadings in justice’s court. On motion of the appellee, the court entered judgment dismissing the appeal for want of a proper return. Eight months later, plaintiff filed petition for writ of mandamus to compel the court to set aside the judgment. The order to show cause was issued two years ago and is now brought, on for hearing.

Plaintiff neglected to invoke the clear and definite remedy provided by statute by way of amended return. He has not been diligent in pursuing his action. There was no abuse of discretion, and no outstanding considerations of justice require issue of the discretionary writ of mandamus.

Writ denied, with costs.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., Concurred.
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

UNPUBLISHED 

March 29, 2016 

v No. 324674 

Wayne Circuit Court 

HERMAN RAMIK KERSEY, LC No. 14-004826-FC 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: RONAYNE KRAUSE, P.J., and JANSEN and STEPHENS, JJ. 

RONAYNE KRAUSE, P.J. (concurring). 

 I concur in most of the majority’s opinion. I write separately to indicate that I find that 

the prosecutor’s repeated statements about defendant being a convicted felon, outside the context 

of the felony firearm charge, to be improper. 

 The record is clear that the prosecutor essentially argued the issue of defendant’s 

conviction while discussing defendant’s credibility, in direct response to defense counsel arguing 

that the victim was not believable. Defense counsel objected and the trial court instructed the 

jury that the prosecutor’s comments were limited to the felon in possession of a firearm charge 

and that the prior felony was not for the purpose of whether or not defendant was believable. 

The prosecutor again stated that defendant was a convicted felon. Defense counsel again 

objected and the trial court stated “let’s move on”. “’Issues of prosecutorial misconduct are 

decided case by case, with the reviewing court examining the pertinent portion of the record and 

evaluating the prosecutor's remarks in context.’” People v Gonzalez, 256 Mich App 212, 222-

223; 663 NW2d 499 (2003), quoting People v Noble, 238 Mich App 647, 660; 608 NW2d 123 

(1999). I find this to be misconduct, however because a jury is presumed to have followed the 

court’s instruction, People v Graves, 458 Mich 476, 486; 581 NW2d 229 (1998), defendant was 

not deprived of a fair trial. 

/s/ Amy Ronayne Krause
# C_2022340EN.01003902.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — YF v EFCA

(Case T-664/21) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Termination of contract - Incompetence - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of good administration)

(2022/C 340/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: YF (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Fisheries Control Agency (represented by: S. Steele, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) of 18 February 2021 by which his contract of indefinite duration was terminated.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders YF to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders YF to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DAY
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,062
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     16,142
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,167
<PP&E>                                          52,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,601)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,333
<BONDS>                                        146,769
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,631
<SALES>                                         39,481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,481
<CGS>                                           24,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (126)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,497
<INCOME-TAX>                                       922
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,575
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 733 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 733

    Expressing support for designation of the month of September as 
                ``Clinical Research Innovation Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2014

Mr. Peters of California (for himself, Mr. Vargas, Ms. Matsui, and Ms. 
  Bass) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for designation of the month of September as 
                ``Clinical Research Innovation Month''.

Whereas Clinical Research Organizations (CROs) provide specially designed 
        services which are fundamental to the development of drugs, biologics, 
        and medical devices that improve the general health and well-being of 
        the people of the United States;
Whereas CROs have more than doubled in size over the past decade;
Whereas the number of studies conducted by CROs has increased by over 500 
        percent over the past 8 years;
Whereas CROs conduct 80 percent of the experimental research for innovative new 
        drugs;
Whereas CROs contribute more than 100,000 professional research jobs to the 
        global innovation economy;
Whereas these cutting-edge research organizations undertake approximately two-
        thirds of business activity for biopharmaceutical development, 
        demonstrating their critical involvement in the pharmaceutical, biotech, 
        and medical device industries;
Whereas of the 88 new drugs to receive Food and Drug Administration and 
        Emergency Medical Associates approval last year, 85 of them were 
        manufactured by CROs;
Whereas CROs research medical solutions to combat diseases such as breast 
        cancer, Alzheimer's Disease, hepatitis, diabetes, asthma, and 
        hypertension;
Whereas CROs have conducted thousands of clinical trials involving over 
        1,000,000 patients as they strive to tackle the world's most pressing 
        medical issues through innovative clinical research; and
Whereas the month of September would be an appropriate time to designate as 
        ``Clinical Research Innovation Month'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Clinical Research 
        Innovation Month'';
            (2) recognizes the considerable contributions of Clinical 
        Research Organizations to the United States; and
            (3) honors these organizations, which will continue to 
        inspire innovation in future generations.
                                 <all>
```