alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS AND
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,840
<SECURITIES>                                    14,758
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,927
<PP&E>                                         211,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,424
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       225,807
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,459
<SALES>                                             16
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,022
<CGS>                                              954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,335)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,335)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration



## FEB 

# fl 2014

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 v:,
__ f :r <-" i, .,__ !**~,**

Subject: Request for Extension ofExemptionNo. 5118, Regulatory Docket# FAA-2001-9128
Dear Sirs:
FAA Flight Inspection Services, Operating Certificate # RU3A796U, requests that it be granted an extension ofexemption No. 5118, as amended. Exemption from 91.119 (b) and (c), 91.159, 91.175 (a) and (b), 91.179, 91.515 (a) (1) and (a) (2) oftitle 14 CFRthat permits FAA Flight _Inspection aircraft to deviate from specific flight rules required by subpart B ofpart 91 while conducting flight checks ofair navigation facilities and instrument approach procedures.
There have been no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. We believe continued operation under the provisions ofthe exemption would be in the public interest. Additionally, we request thatthe exemption period be granted for a period ofat least three years, or longer ifpermitted. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,

# ~~~ Lmry G.**H~ilton** Director ofOperations Flight Inspection Operations Group Flight Inspection Services
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos.33-31932, 33-40222, 33-41854,33-43856, 33-58766, 333-110460, 333-115724, 333-15933, 333-24187 and 333-28415)of Magnetek, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses, and in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-31439, 33-33887, 33-34112, 33-34834,33-44519,33-58929, 333-04021, 333-17889, 333-45935, 333-45939, 333-90645, 333-90647,333-75418, and 333-129362) pertaining to the 1987 Stock Option Plan ofMagnetek, Inc., the Magnetek, Inc. FlexCare Plus Retirement SavingsPlan, the 1989 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Magnetek, Inc., theMagnetek Unionized Employee Savings Plan, the Amended and Restated 1989Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Magnetek, Inc., the Second Amendedand Restated 1989 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Magnetek, Inc., theMagnetek, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the Magnetek, Inc.Deferred Investment Plan, the Magnetek, Inc. 1997 Non-Employee DirectorStock Option Plan, the Magnetek, Inc. Amended and Restated DirectorCompensation and Deferral Investment Plan, the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan ofMagnetek, Inc., the 2000 Employee Stock Plan of Magnetek, Inc., the2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Magnetek, Inc. and the 2004 StockIncentive Plan of Magnetek, Inc. and Executive Employment Agreement for ThomasG. Boren of our reports dated August 17, 2007, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule ofMagnetek, Inc. listed in Item 15(a), Magnetek, Inc. management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofMagnetek, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended July 1, 2007.
|                 | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|----------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                 |
| Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
| August 24, 2007      |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

ION Networks, Inc.

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION


In connection with the periodic report of ION Networks, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Patrick E. Delaney,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
               and

          (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
               indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ION Networks,
Inc. and will be retained by ION Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date:  April 21 , 2005                       By       /s/ Patrick E. Delaney
       ---------------                               ---------------------------
                                                     Patrick Delaney
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
                                        -------------------------
                                        Michael E. DeDomenico
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        May 14, 2004
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6338

KAMAL NASSEREE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:11-ct-03223-BO)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kamal Nasseree, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kamal Nasseree appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief in his negligence action brought pursuant to the Federal 

Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671–2680 (West 2006 & 

Supp. 2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm. Cf. Logue v. United States, 412 

U.S. 521, 529-30 (1979) (no federal Government liability for 

negligent supervision of county jail employees where Bureau of 

Prisons lacked authority to physically supervise jail employees); 

Humphries v. N.C. Dep’t of Corr., 479 S.E.2d 27, 28 (N.C. App. 

1996) (holding that there can be no negligence where defendant 

owes no duty). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### F. E. C. RY. CO. v. JONES.

No. 38599.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | this annual report on Form 20-F of BT Group plc fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BT Group plc.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                              
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: May 19, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Gavin Patterson          
|                   |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Gavin Patterson        
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Group Chief Executive 
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 19, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Tony Chanmugam           
|                   |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Tony Chanmugam         
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Group Finance Director
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 24, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 24, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0077. DEIDRA CRUTCHFIELD v. MAIN STREET RENEWAL, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CV02501
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, E.L. Spencer, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2008



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                       
|E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                           
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1162 

To authorize the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration to provide certain funds to eligible entities for activities 

undertaken to address the marine debris impacts of the March 2011 

Tohoku earthquake and subsequent tsunami, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2013 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To authorize the Administrator of the National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration to provide certain funds to 

eligible entities for activities undertaken to address the 

marine debris impacts of the March 2011 Tohoku earthquake and subsequent tsunami, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE FUNDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, the Administrator of the National Oceanic and 

6 Atmospheric Administration may provide funds to an eligi7 ble entity impacted by the covered marine debris event to 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1162 IS

1 assist such entity with the costs of any activity previously 

2 carried out, being carried out, or to be carried out to ad3 dress the effects of such event. 

4 (b) FUNDING.—The Administrator may provide 

5 funds under subsection (a) using any funds provided by 

6 the Government of Japan for activities to address the ef7 fects of the covered marine debris event. 

8 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi9 nitions apply: 

10 (1) COVERED MARINE DEBRIS EVENT.—The 

11 term ‘‘covered marine debris event’’ means the 

12 events, including marine debris, resulting from the 

13 March 2011 Tohoku earthquake and subsequent tsu14 nami. 

15 (2) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term ‘‘eligible enti16 ty’’ means any State, local, or tribal government. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1133 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

new markets tax credit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2013 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. CARDIN, Ms. COLLINS, and 

Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the new markets tax credit, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Markets Tax 

5 Credit Extension Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF NEW MARKETS TAX 

7 CREDIT. 

8 (a) EXTENSION.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (G) of section 

10 45D(f)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1133 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘, 2011, 2012, and 2013’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘and each calendar year thereafter’’. 

3 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

4 45D(f)(3) of such Code is amended by striking the 

5 last sentence. 

6 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Subsection (f) of sec7 tion 45D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend8 ed by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any cal11 endar year beginning after 2013, the dollar 

12 amount in paragraph (1)(G) shall be increased 

13 by an amount equal to— 

14 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

15 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de16 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal17 endar year, determined by substituting 

18 ‘calendar year 2000’ for ‘calendar year 

19 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

20 ‘‘(B) ROUNDING RULE.—Any increase 

21 under subparagraph (A) which is not a multiple 

22 of $1,000,000 shall be rounded to the nearest 

23 multiple of $1,000,000.’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1133 IS

1 (c) ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RELIEF.—Subpara2 graph (B) of section 38(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

3 Code of 1986 is amended— 

4 (1) by redesignating clauses (v) through (ix) as 

5 clauses (vi) through (x), respectively, and 

6 (2) by inserting after clause (iv) the following 

7 new clause: 

8 ‘‘(v) the credit determined under sec9 tion 45D, but only with respect to credits 

10 determined with respect to qualified equity 

11 investments (as defined in section 45D(b)) 

12 initially made before January 1, 2014,’’. 

13 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para15 graph (2), the amendments made by this section 

16 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

17 Act. 

18 (2) ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RELIEF.—The 

19 amendments made by subsection (c) shall apply to 

20 credits determined with respect to qualified equity 

21 investments (as defined in section 45D(b) of the In22 ternal Revenue Code of 1986) initially made after 

23 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order filed October 13 , 20 11

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00 445

- CV

____________ KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER , Appellant

V.

THE KROGER CO. , ANN POTTER and MELINDA COOMBS Appellee s

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008

- 45365



### O R D E R
No record has been filed in this appeal. According to information provided to this
court, t his is an appeal from a judgment signed May 6, 2011 . Appellant filed his notice of appeal on May 18, 2011 . Appellant also filed a n affidavit of indigence

. On May 23 , 2011, the Harris County District Clerk filed a contest to appellant ’ s affidavit of inability to pay costs. Our records do not indicate th at the official court reporter, Amanda King, filed

a contest. This court has been advised that to date, there has been no order signed on the District Clerk’s contest.2

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 governs the procedure to be followed when a part y seeks to appeal without the advance payment of costs. Rule 20.1(i) provides that the trial court must either conduct a hearing or sign an order extending the time to conduct a hearing within 10 days after the contest was filed. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i)( 2). The time
for conducted a heari ng must not be extended for more than 20 days from the date the order extending the hearing is signed. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i)(3). If the trial court has not signed an order sustaining the contest within the period set for the hearing, the affidavit’s allegations will be deemed true, and the party will be allowed to proceed without advance payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i)(4).
In this case, the contest to appellant’s affidavit was filed more than four months a go. The time period to conduct a hearing and sign an order sustaining the contest has long passed. Accordingly, we issue the following o rder:
The allegations in appellant’s affidavit of indigence are deemed true and appellant is allowed to proceed withou t the advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i)(4).
The Harris County District Clerk is ordered to file a clerk = s record in this appeal on or
before November 14 , 2011 . The official court reporter, Amanda King , is ordered to file a reporter = s record in this appeal on or before November 14 , 2011.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher

.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 335

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1994

Mr. MICHEL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees.

1 Resolved, That Representative Vernon J. Ehlers of

2 Michigan be and is hereby elected to the following stand3 ing committees of the House of Representatives: The Com4 mittee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Com5 mittee on Public Works and Transportation.

Æ
#### Joseph A. PEEL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 9, 1970.

Joseph A. Peel, Jr., in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See this court’s opinion at 210 So.2d 14. In addition, this is the second motion for similar relief and as noted in the trial judge’s order there has been no new ground set forth by appellant. CrPR 1.850, 3 F.S.A. expressly provides that the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.

LILES, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
**FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE**

dated as of January 7, 2009

among

**SKYTERRA LP,**

**SKYTERRA FINANCE CO.,**

**THE GUARANTORS NAMED HEREIN**

and

**THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON**

as Trustee

to the

**INDENTURE**

dated as of January 7, 2008

among 

**SKYTERRA LP**

**(formerly named MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES LP),**

 

**SKYTERRA FINANCE CO.**

**(formerly named MSV FINANCE CO.),**

**THE GUARANTORS NAMED THEREIN**

and 

**THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON**

**(formerly named THE BANK OF NEW YORK)**

as Trustee

**16.5% SENIOR NOTES DUE 2013**

 

 

----