T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JS/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R I C K S I E G E L , a n in d iv id u a l, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. A N G E L A M . B R A D S T R E E T , i n h er of f i c i a l c apa c i tya s the L abor C om m i ss i on erfor the S t at e of C al i forni a, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 56991 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 2 4 8 0 - CA S- SS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C hr i s t i naA . S ny de r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R ic kS ie g e l ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s o r d e rd is m is s in g h is



# FI LED DE C 29 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ S/ Res ea r ch 08- 56991 2 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n f o rin ju n c tiv e a n dd e c la r a to ryr e lie f a g a in s t th e C a lif

o rn ia L ab o rC o m m is s io n e r . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . N

at ’ l A s s ’ n f orthe A dv anc e m e nt

of Ps y c hoanal ys is v . Cal. B d. of Ps y c hology , 228 F . 3d 1043, 1049 ( 9th C i r . 2000) . W e m a ya f f i rm on a nygr ound s u p p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . O v e v . G w i nn , 2 6 4 F .3 d8 1 7 , 8 2 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtre sol ved S i egel ’ s c l ai m s on tw o g roun ds, on e of w hi ch w as o n th e m e r its . W e a f

f irm o n th a t g r o u n df

o rth e r e a s o n s s ta te db yth e d is tr ic t c o u rt. T o the ext entS i egel ’ s e qu al prot ec t i on cl ai m i s bas ed on the di ff er ence s betw ee n the T a l e ntA ge nc i e s A c ta nd s t a tut e s r e gul a t i ng othe roc c upa t i ona l l i c e ns e s , the c l a i m f a i l s be c aus e the r e i s ar a t i ona l ba s i s f orthe C a l i f

orni al e gi s l a tur e ’ s de c i s i on to c r a f t th e A c t d if

f e r e n tlyf r o m o th e rlic e n s in g s ta tu te s . Se e N at ’ l A s s ’ n f orthe A dv a n c e m e n t o

f Ps y c h o a n a lys is , 228 F . 3d a t1050- 53 ( r e j e c t i ng e qua l pr ot e c t i on chal l enge t o C al i forni a l i ce nsi ng sc hem e und erra t i on al basi s t es tand st at i ng that “[ i]t s im p lyis n o t th e f

u n c tio n o f

th e c o u rts to te ll C a lif

o rn iah o w to c r a f

t its l egi sl at i on ”) . B e c aus e S i e ge l doe s nots t a t e ac l a i m unde rs e c t i on 1983, hi s c l a i m f or d e c la r a to ryr e lie f

u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 0 1 f a ils . Se e H

oe c k v . C i t yof P or t land , 57 F . 3d 78 1, 78 7 (9th C i r. 19 95 ).J S/ Res ea r ch 08- 56991 3 S i e ge l ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons a r e una va i l i ng. W e d e n yS ie g e l’s r e q u e s t f o rju d ic ia l n o tic e , a n dw e d e n ya s m o o t h is m o tio n to e x p e d ite th is ap p e a l. AF F I RME D.