alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State Highway Department *v.*Campbell *et al.*

(Division A.

May 13, 1935.

Suggestion of Error Overruled June 10, 1935.)

[161 So. 461.

No. 31726.]

*398E. R. Holmes, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, for appellant.

*399Logan & Barbee, of Hernando, for appellees.

*401Argued orally by E. R. Holmes, Jr., for appellant, and by R. F. B. Logan, for appellee.

Smith, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant instituted a proceeding in the court of a justice of the peace under section 1480' et seq., Code 1930, for the condemnation of land owned by the appellees, for use as part of a public highway. The judgment rendered awarded the appellees damages in the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars, from which the appellant appealed to the circuit court. A motion by the appellees to dismiss the appeal was sustained. The ground of this motion is that, after the rendition of the eminent domain judgment, the appellant accepted the benefit thereof by entering upon and appropriating the land, thereby waiving its right to appeal. In support of its claim that this motion should have been overruled, the appellant says, first, that it had the right to enter upon and appropriate the land for highway purposes without first compensating the appellees therefor; and, second, although at the time the motion was sustained it was in possession of the land, and using it for highway purposes, that it entered upon and appropriated the land prior to the commencement of the eminent domain proceeding.

The first of these contentions will be left out of view, and no opinion expressed thereon, for the reason that the judgment of the court below sustaining the motion to dismiss the appeal must be reversed on the appellant’s second ground therefor. The evidence discloses that *402prior to the commencement of the eminent domain proceeding the appellant had entered upon the land, and had done everything necessary towards the construction of the highway thereon, except laying concrete, although, according to the appellees, this was done without their consent. 'We are not here concerned with the right of the appellant to enter upon and appropriate the land prior to compensating the appellees therefor, and express no opinion thereon. Assuming merely for the purpose of the argument -that this appropriation of the land was wrongful, nevertheless the appellant was not deprived thereby of exercising its right to condemn the land for highway purposes; and it did nothing after the eminent domain judgment was rendered that it was not doing prior to the institution of the proceeding therefor.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should have been overruled.

Reversed and remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; PAR-17-031: Role of Age-Associated Metabolic Changes in Alzhemimer's Disease.                    

*Date:*                         July 31, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Samuel C. Edwards, Ph.D., Chief, BDCN IRG, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5210, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1246,                         *edwardss@csr.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 17, 2018.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-15605 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUMMIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. DATED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      14,451,896
<SECURITIES>                                35,668,406
<RECEIVABLES>                                  796,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,741,443
<PP&E>                                       2,034,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,108,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,199,306
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,121
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,803,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,108,679
<SALES>                                      2,713,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,713,933
<CGS>                                        1,514,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,727,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                697,783
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            697,783
<DISCONTINUED>                             (2,884,959)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,187,176)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 114 

To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to certain exceptions 

to discharge in bankruptcy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2013 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. HARKIN, 

Mr. REED, and Ms. WARREN) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to 

certain exceptions to discharge in bankruptcy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness for Strug5 gling Students Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCEPTIONS TO DISCHARGE. 

7 Section 523(a)(8) of title 11, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘dependents, for’’ and all that follows 

9 through the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘de10 pendents, for an educational benefit overpayment or loan 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 114 IS

1 made, insured, or guaranteed by a governmental unit or 

2 made under any program funded in whole or in part by 

3 a governmental unit or an obligation to repay funds re4 ceived from a governmental unit as an educational benefit, 

5 scholarship, or stipend;’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- 2015-4207 Directorate Identifier: -AD 20 15-NM- 123-AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, AT A, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGAN IZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

JAL Atsushi Tabata 8112/2015 Paragraph (j)( l )(iii) error 

Lu~l:l i,.. F'o.h(\ t. e... lll!. ~4..- a '10f "l_l)\~ f.b.t6 ('r .... J.,( \ Y I )(iii) t.rtot' ,.h> '~;'"'(' ('-~~~ _.. ~ ..... R>blt..tt 9 IC\ "'l.C)\S c:.~ 1-~'+~1.\-1\bS Q.1.. d.f'f . 

~Q.oC:. u '"' 'Etl\ ~\\o.ro C:..\GJ"ti ~ \'\ 1..0\~ ~ ~ll-11,\lt..S Cl"l.- o.,p1

•• 

X;o........ A i.r\\NZ.S. f::..A,o,.. \v... e rt& 1()\S $to "':l;'"t-'l.I-1\"'S' Ct."l.. ft..t·~ ~I 

Other/Additional Information:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141935

ANTHONY HANSKNECHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141935 COA: 297010 Ionia CC: 2009-027135-CZ CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC., d/b/a B-93 and WBCT-FM, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1017 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1017

  To permit flexibility in the application of the budget sequester by 
                           Federal agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2013

  Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                               the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To permit flexibility in the application of the budget sequester by 
                           Federal agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``agency'' means--
            (1) an Executive agency (as defined in section 105 of title 
        5, United States Code);
            (2) an office, agency, or other establishment in the 
        legislative branch which is not a part of another office, 
        agency, or other establishment in the legislative branch; and
            (3) an office, agency, or other establishment in the 
        judicial branch which is not a part of another office, agency, 
        or other establishment in the judicial branch.

SEC. 2. FLEXIBLE SEQUESTER IMPLEMENTED BY AGENCY HEADS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
budget sequester for an account in the security and non-security 
categories required by section 251A of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 for fiscal year 2013 shall be 
implemented within each account as determined by the head of the agency 
with spending authority over such account.
    (b) Appropriations Oversight.--The head of an agency may not 
exercise the authority provided in subsection (a) unless the head has 
submitted a notice of implementation describing the proposed exercise 
of authority to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses not 
later than 5 days before exercising such authority.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.2Consent of Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.     As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 33-57348, No. 333-34617, No. 333-66938 and No. 333-117533) on FormsS-8, and the registration statements (No. 33-90296, No. 333-112518 and No. 333-119725) on Forms S-3of Parallel Petroleum Corporation of information from our reserves report dated January 16, 2006and all references to our firm included in or made a part of the annual report on Form 10-K ofParallel Petroleum Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.     /s/ CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.Ft. Worth, Texas
Exhibit 32.1  CEO Certification

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom L. Kirchner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ T. L. KIRCHNER

Tom L. Kirchner                                                                        
Chief Executive Officer                                                               
Date:  March 24, 2010
# C_2022198EN.01006502.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/65

---

Order of the General Court of 17 March 2022 — Alcogroup and Alcodis v Commission

(Case T-740/21) (1)

(2022/C 198/94)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 17.1.2022.

---
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the undersigned, Michael E. DeDomenico, Chief Executive Officer of NuCO2 Inc., a
Florida  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify,  to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004
of the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Michael E. Dedomenico
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Michael E. DeDomenico
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          February 9, 2005
```
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph BANKS, Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53953.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 1973.

In re: Joseph Banks, Jr. applying for writ of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition and other remedial writs.

Writ refused. The petition presents no basis for relief.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
H. Res. 748 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 13, 2014. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5682) to 

approve the Keystone XL Pipeline. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill 

are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided among and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the chair and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) 

one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00511-CV

JUBILEE ACADEMIC CENTER, INC.

v.

CAMERON APPRAISAL DISTRICT

On Appeal from the

404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-DCL-05470-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in 

accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 16, 2022
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 137th District Court of Lubbock County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on November 7,

2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Jose Garcia v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00119-CR Trial Court Number: 2012-434,958

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 07, 2014, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on January 23, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
**Exhibit32.2**

 

Certification of Annual Report

 

I, Susan D. Berland, ChiefFinancial Officer of NeoRx Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.               theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (12 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March  1, 2006 | By:    | /s/ SUSAN D.  BERLAND |   |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Susan D.  Berland     |   |
|                      |        |                       |        |  |

 

1

----
‘*

**i** OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN**

**&JQaoeblo c.**  **uoodmw ldepadilip**  **qou@y Attorney**  **Jj.& walls**  **county** **A&&o*,** **texml**

**glrlrturo, waharired**  **thm sup**  **a on**  **praotioe uld**  **pouedur*** **la** The opaatmontale0 pmrldod

t b* ttme it iLla the fulee, tho llfile uiththo Beorotmqo? 11 **8rtieles** or eeationrof the **ou~ral uws**  **OS the**  **state** or **~9~9, aa**  **part8 0t**  ut10lo* 8nd sootlon8 of ruoh qwmral xawa, wbleh, in itr judpmnt, are ropoalqdba 8ootlon of thim Jut. Such llrt giving the ooaetruotlon aS the 8uprme Qourt am to the *nom& L8wr u14 pta of lawmrepe*led by !3oat&oaZ #hUl bebatitute, an& hove the 8mm weight m.4 effect, 8s l n7 Other daoleloa of the Supreme Cuurt.agonorableC. Woodrow Laughlin,page 2

By Senate Eill 206, the 44th L*gISlatu?apassedwhat **is known**  **as Article**  **7336,1,** **Vernon*6** **Revised** Civil **Stattat4m, ad**  **Seotion 6**  **thereof pmrldes**  **a form**  **for aitat$oas**  **in tar**  l uits.

The s~pr4B4 COUt Or TaXaS aoioplisd With Section 3 of Eiousa

Bill 108, supra, end tiledwith the ;earetaryof Stats a &fat of all artiolasand sectionsof the GeneralLaws whlah wm in its judgamntrepealed**by** the Rules of Praotloeaad **Pro- ..duN**  **in Civil**  **Imtions.** An sxamlaatlonOS the list does not **ulaa$ose that**  **Artiole 7328.1,**  was tansldsred**by** the Supreme Court as belkxg

repealed. The list **war,** filed **bl the**  **Suprmse Court**  **on wteber**  **29,** 1940, and /,rtiolr 732&l, uas a part of the General L&W at that time. %e are theraforeof the oppinlon ,that Rule Eio. 101 of the &lg+s of Practiosand Proaedure In Civil hations doeu uot~mplaoe Ar%ials 7326.1,

You are theretore~adrlsed that fn our oplnlona oltation in a tax suit is riot suff,iaient

wile86 it is substantlallp In the fork pTe%eribedby said hrticla 9ZWl.l.

**IQ** answer to **yOUr SSOOnd**  **pWStien** .yQu are adtlaad that Artlola 73138.1

has not **been** rspaaledfor the seasons above **etated,** and that the folpl presaribsdtherein is the proper fors~ fbl: use in tax suits,
Your attentionIs se&lad to the faot that ths Suprssm Coart has amended Eule No. 8 of the Ruler of Praotloeand Proemlure in Cftil **Aotlons, effeotlre**  Daoember 81, 1941, expressly aontlnulngthe rules zoverniq procedure Fn Tax suits whicrh were effwtlre faumbdiately prior to Saptstribar 1, 1941. Trusting thet tha toregoIn(~ fully asmwersyour Inquiry,we are Tours very truly