alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 33970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10466]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Rescindment of a System of Records Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: ``Foreign Service Employee Locator/Notification Records, 
State-12'', which is being rescinded, contains information used to 
forward employees' mail and for the notification of next of kin in the 
event of an emergency or death of an employee.

DATES: On March 24, 2018, the Department of State published a notice in 
the Federal Register (83 FR 17873) that records in State-12 were being 
consolidated with ``Employee Contact Records, State-40'' into a single 
modified State-40, because the records and system purposes are 
substantially similar.

ADDRESSES: Questions can be submitted by mail, email, or by calling 
Mary Avery, the Senior Agency Official for Privacy (SAOP), on (202) 
663-2215. If mail, please write to: U.S. Department of State; Office of 
Global Information Systems, Privacy Staff, A/GIS/PRV; SA-2, Suite 8100; 
Washington, DC 20522-0208. If email, please address the email to the 
Senior Agency Official for Privacy (SAOP), Mary R. Avery, at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2e2c0dbc4d3d1cbf2c1c6d3c6d79cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bdbf9e2fdeae8f2cbf8ffeaffeea5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>. Please write ``Foreign Service Employee Locator/
Notification Records, State-12'' on the envelope or the subject line of 
your email.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary R. Avery, Senior Agency Official 
for Privacy (SAOP); U.S. Department of State; Office of Global 
Information Services, A/GIS/PRV; SA-2, Suite 8100; Washington, DC 
20522-0208 or by calling (202) 663-2215.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The records in ``Foreign Service Employee 
Locator/Notification Records, State-12'' (previously published at 42 FR 
49705) were consolidated with ``Employee Contact Records, State-40'' 
(previously published at 75 FR 67431). The new SORN reflecting the 
consolidated system of records ``Employee Contact Records, State-40'' 
was published at 83 FR 17873 on March 24, 2018.
SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER
    Foreign Service Employee Locator/Notification Records, State-12.

HISTORY:
    ``Foreign Service Employee Locator/Notification Records, State-12'' 
was previously published at 42 FR 49705 and ``Employee Contact Records, 
State-40'' was previously published at 75 FR 67431 before being 
modified and re-published at 83 FR 17873.

Mary R. Avery,
Senior Agency Official for Privacy, Senior Advisor, Office of Global 
Information Services, Bureau of Administration, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-15308 Filed 7-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-24-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Fred Joel WITKOFF, D. D. S., Appellant, v. Lillian CARLTON, Appellee.

No. 71-525.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 11

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                              Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                                March 31, 1998        March 31, 1998
                                                --------------        --------------
<S>                                            <C>                      <C>      
Net Income                                     $   557,945              1,016,735
                                                 =========              =========

Weighted average shares outstanding              3,122,845              3,117,116

Reduction for common shares not yet
 released by Employee Stock Ownership Plan        (249,790)              (252,435)
                                                 ---------              ---------

Total weighted average common shares
 outstanding for basic computation               2,873,055              2,864,681
                                                 =========              =========

Basic earnings per share                       $       .19                    .35
                                                      ====                   ====

Total weighted average common shares
 outstanding for basic computation               2,873,055              2,864,681

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
 effect of stock options                           123,346                122,997
                                                 ---------              ---------

Total weighted average common shares and
 equivalents outstanding for diluted
 computation                                     2,996,401              2,987,678
                                                 =========              =========

Diluted earnings per share                     $       .19                    .34
                                                      ====                    ===
</TABLE>



                                      -19-
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Lori A. Jones, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Analytical Surveys, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and the registrant’s have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this annual report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 10, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS, LP FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999. INFORMATION IS ONLY INCLUDED FOR OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS
LP (A REGISTRANT) AND DOES NOT INCLUDE INFORMATION FOR OLYMPUS CAPITAL CORP.,
WHICH HAS NO OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000861255
<NAME>       OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,829<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         429,426
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,116,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        648,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     329,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,116,704
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,067
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (61,474)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (534)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,940)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES NET OF ALLOWANCE
<F2>PR&E NET OF DEPRECIATION
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 748 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 145
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 748

                          [Report No. 113-617]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5682) to approve the 
                         Keystone XL Pipeline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2014

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5682) to approve the 
                         Keystone XL Pipeline.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5682) to approve the 
Keystone XL Pipeline. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of 
order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto 
to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate equally divided among and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
and the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                                 House Calendar No. 145

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 748

                          [Report No. 113-617]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5682) to approve the 
                         Keystone XL Pipeline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 12, 2014

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT
23.2
   
  INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT
  
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
HealthWarehouse.com (formerly Clacendix, Inc.). on Form S-8 (File No.
333-139072) of our report dated March 16, 2009 and April 15, 2010, with respect
to our audits of the financial statements of HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008.
  
  /s/Clark,
Schaefer, Hackett & Co.
  Cincinnati,
Ohio
 April 15,
2010
#### HENRY WATERS TRUCK & TRACTOR CO., INC. v. Sam RELAN.

No. 53589.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1973.

In re: Sam Relan applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 277 So.2d 463.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
#### ESTATE of William R. DEAN et al., Appellants, v. SAINT AIRCRAFT, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-14.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 8, 1972.

L. C. Schowe of Riley, Schowe & Salts-man, St. Petersburg, and James F. Littman, Stuart, for appellants.

Earnest W. Dean, Jr. of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, and James B. Thompson of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey, Kinney & Boggs, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal a summary final judgment entered in favor of the appellee.

Upon consideration of the entire record it appears that there are general issues of material fact which preclude the entry of a summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.
#### Nonna Osipova, Appellant, v J & J Hotel Co., LLC, Defendants, and New York City Department of Health et al., Respondents.

[736 NYS2d 229]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered on or about February 7, 2001, which, insofar as appealed from, converted *359the municipal defendants’ motion for dismissal for failure to state a cause of action to one for summary judgment and granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against said defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The municipal defendants’ motion to dismiss was properly converted into one for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3211 (c). Contrary to plaintiffs argument, she was afforded the requisite notice of the conversion and opportunity to make factual submissions. Summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs claims against the municipal defendants was proper in light of plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies (see, *Matter of BMP Contr. Corp. v City Envtl. Control Bd.,*202 AD2d 223). In any event, had plaintiffs claims against the municipal defendants been made after administrative avenues of relief had been exhausted, such claims, properly brought within a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see, *Caponigro v White,*223 AD2d 365, *lv denied*88 NY2d 802), would have been properly rejected on the merits since there was a rational basis for the challenged determination fining plaintiff for creating a nuisance within the meaning of Administrative Code of City of New York § 17-142. We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1191. GARY FORD v. THE STATE.

On March 28, 2013, Gary Ford was convicted of two counts of aggravated

assault, two counts of robbery by force, kidnapping, and aggravated sexual battery. 

Thereafter, on December 22, 2015, the trial court denied Ford’s motion for new trial. 

On January 26, 2016, Ford filed a notice of appeal to this Court.

1

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable

order. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is

an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See Rowland v. State,

264 Ga. 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Ford’s notice of appeal, filed 35 days after

entry of the order, is untimely, and this appeal is therefore DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

We note, however, that Ford was represented by counsel before the trial court

and may be entitled to pursue an out-of-time appeal. He is therefore informed of the

following in accordance with Rowland v. State, supra at 875-876: This appeal has

been dismissed because you failed to file a timely notice of appeal. If you still wish

to appeal, you may petition the trial court for leave to file an out-of-time appeal. If

the trial court grants your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that order

to file a notice of appeal referencing your conviction. If the trial court denies your

1 Ford also filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of his pre-trial plea

in bar based upon an alleged violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. 

This appeal was dismissed because Ford was not entitled to a direct appeal, but

instead should have followed the interlocutory application process. See Ford v. State,

319 Ga. App. 655 (738 SE2d 111) (2013).

March 18, 2016
request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that order to file a notice of appeal

referencing the denial of your request for an out-of-time appeal.

 The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to Ford and to

Ford’s attorney, and the latter is also directed to send a copy to Ford.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/18/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS AND
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,236
<SECURITIES>                                    14,463
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,925
<PP&E>                                         217,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,396
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       225,807
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   254,189
<SALES>                                          1,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,356
<CGS>                                            1,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,577)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
# C_2023155EN.01004801.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — Sánchez-Gavito León v Council and Commission

(Case T-100/21) (1)

(International Cotton Advisory Committee - Decision (EU) 2017/876 - Staff of an international organisation to which the European Union has acceded - Agreement on the applicant’s conditions of departure - Actions for failure to act - Absence in part of invitation to act - No standing to bring proceedings - Inadmissibility - Liability - Causal link)

(2023/C 155/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Maria del Carmen Sánchez-Gavito León (Reston, Virginia, United States), (represented by: M. Veissiere, lawyer)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Antoniadis, M. Bauer and A. Boggio-Tomasaz, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: T. Lilamand and M. Monfort, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Articles 265 and 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, a declaration that the failure to act of the Council of the European Union and of the European Commission was unlawful in so far as those institutions unlawfully refrained from acting following the formal call for action addressed to them by the applicant, a Spanish national and former staff member of the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) to which the European Union acceded by the adoption of Council Decision (EU) 2017/876 of 18 May 2017 on the accession of the European Union to the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) (OJ 2017 L 134, p. 23) and, second, compensation for the harm she allegedly suffered on account of the conduct of the Council, of the Commission and of their agents, which she claims failed to act even though they were aware of the harassment to which the applicant claims she was subjected by the Executive Director of the ICAC (‘the Executive Director’) and that director’s failure to adhere to the agreement on the applicant’s conditions of departure from the ICAC (‘the agreement on the conditions of departure’), and the absence of any means of redress by which the applicant could state her claim.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms María del Carmen Sánchez-Gavito León to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms María del Carmen Sánchez-Gavito León to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.

---