alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.2**

 

**REVOLVINGNOTE**

 
| $25,000,000 |   | April 30, 2002 |
|-------------|--------|---------------------|

 

For value received, the undersigned, MACKIE DESIGNSINC. (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of U.S. BANK NATIONALASSOCIATION (“U.S. Bank”), at 1420 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, Washington98101, or such other place or places as the holder hereof may designate inwriting, the principal sum of Twenty-Five Million Dollars ($25,000,000) or somuch thereof as advanced by U.S. Bank in lawful, immediately availablemoney of the United States of America, in accordance with the terms andconditions of that certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of even dateherewith by and between Borrower and U.S. Bank (together with allsupplements, exhibits, amendments and modifications thereto, the “Credit Agreement”).  Borrower also promises to pay interest onthe unpaid principal balance hereof, commencing as of the first date of anadvance hereunder, in like money in accordance with the terms and conditionsand at the rate or rates provided in the Credit Agreement.

 

Borrower and all endorsers, sureties and guarantorshereof jointly and severally waive presentment for payment, demand, notice ofnonpayment, notice of protest and protest of this Note and all other notices inconnection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default, dishonor orenforcement of the payment of this Note except such notices as are specificallyrequired by this Note or by the Credit Agreement, and they agree that theliability of each of them shall be unconditional without regard to theliability of any other party and shall not be in any manner affected by anyindulgence, extension of time, renewal, waiver or modification granted orconsented to by U.S. Bank. Borrower and all endorsers, sureties and guarantors hereof, if any, (1) consentto any and all extensions of time, renewals, waivers or modifications that maybe granted by U.S. Bank with respect to the payment or other provisions ofthis Note and the Credit Agreement; (2) consent to the release of anyproperty now or hereafter securing this Note with or without substitution; and(3) agree that additional makers, endorsers, guarantors or sureties maybecome parties hereto without notice to them and without affecting theirliability hereunder.

 

*[Thisspace intentionally left blank.]*

 

----

 

This Note is the Revolving Note referred to in the Credit Agreement andas such is entitled to all of the benefits and obligations specified in theCredit Agreement, including but not limited to any Collateral and anyconditions to making advances hereunder. Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein with the samemeanings.  Reference is made to theCredit Agreement for provisions for the repayment of this Note and theacceleration of the maturity hereof.

 
|   | MACKIE DESIGNS  INC. |
|--------|----------------------|
|   |                 |
|   |                 |
|   | By:                  |   |
|   |                 | Name: |   |
|   |                 | Title: |   |

 

2

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DAY
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             602
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,729
<PP&E>                                          46,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,895
<BONDS>                                        247,479
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           35,442
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (86,974)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,805
<SALES>                                        132,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,516
<CGS>                                           83,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,010)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,512
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,552)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,050)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      8,580,164
<SECURITIES>                               31,762,314 
<RECEIVABLES>                               3,902,008 
<ALLOWANCES>                                (652,925) 
<INVENTORY>                                   121,504 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              506,781       
<PP&E>                                      5,547,797      
<DEPRECIATION>                            (2,426,009)    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             48,446,287      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       6,823,083    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                      103,477 
<OTHER-SE>                                          0       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               48,446,287         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            4,013,804          
<CGS>                                       2,779,475          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               9,088,261          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (4,495,111)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,936      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                              (4,498,047) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.43) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.43) 
        

</TABLE>
#### B. C. SKINNER, Ben L. Skinner and Francis L. Skinner, Appellants, v. Dorothy WELLER, Appellee.

No. 67-133.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Aug. 10, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Evergreen Solar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A. Farber,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Mark A. Farber
------------------------------
Mark A. Farber
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2003
Exhibit 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION UNDER

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles A. Rowland, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of ViroPharma Incorporated;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Charles A. Rowland, Jr.
|Charles A. Rowland, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer    
|                           
|October 27, 2010
#### Walter L. HINSON, Petitioner, v. MARLIN E. FITCH, INC., Employer, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Carrier, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 37283.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 2, 1968.

Edward Schroll, Miami, for petitioner.

Anthony J. Beisler, Ft. Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 26, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Petitioner’s application for attorney’s fees is also denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Opinion issued February 25, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00843-CV

———————————

VINCENT YOUNG, Appellant

V.

PRO PLAYER FUNDING, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-58323

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Vincent Young, has filed an unopposed motion requesting that 

we dismiss his appeal and expedite issuance of the mandate. No prior opinion has 

issued. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
2

The clerk of this Court is directed to issue mandate immediately. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 18.1(c). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11:00 a.m., Wednesday, July 25, 2018.

# PLACE:

U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Determination on FIVE original jurisdiction cases.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jacqueline Graham, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20530, (202) 346-7001.

Dated: July 16, 2018.

J. Patricia Wilson Smoot,

Chairperson, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2018-15540 Filed 7-17-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
#### Floyd RHODEN v. Earl FAIRCLOTH, Attorney General.

No. 38786.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### INTERNATIONAL LADIES’ GARMENT WORKERS’ UNION, LOCAL 415, International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, AFL-CIO; Miami Joint Council of the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, AFL-CIO; all unincorporated voluntary associations, et al., Appellants, v. SCHERER & SONS, INC., a Florida corporation, and the Florida Apparel Manufacturers’ Association, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 65-411.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 7, 1968.

Kaplan & Shapiro, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Marchant, Perkins, Cook & Caldwell, Miami, for appellees.

ORDER ON MANDATE

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on the 28th day of June, 1966 (188 So.2d 380) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and,

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of the United States, by its opinion and judgment filed April 22, 1968 (390 U.S. 717, 88 S.Ct. 1402, 20 L.Ed.2d 249) and mandate dated May 17, 1968, now lodged in this court, vacated this court’s judgment and remanded the case to this court for further consideration citing Retail Clerk’s International Ass’n., etc. v. Schermerhorn, 375 U.S. 96, 84 S.Ct. 219, 11 L.Ed.2d 179 (1963); Local No. 438 Const. and General Laborers’, etc. v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 83 S.Ct. 531, 9 L.Ed.2d 514 (1963).

Now, therefore, having considered the above cases as directed by the Supreme Court of the United States it is ordered that the judgment of this court filed on the 28th day of June, 1966, is vacated, and the judgment of the Circuit Court appealed from in this cause is reversed with directions to enter an order consistent with the holding herein of the Supreme Court of the United States; costs allowed shall be taxed in the Circuit Court (Rule 3.16 (b) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-85636, 33-89124, 333-76957, 333-49290, 333-139969 and 333-153375, Form S-3 Nos. 333-30170, 333-76107, 333-92662, 333-124355, 333-134564,333-135580, 333-135581, 333-138061 and 333-155209, and Form S-4 No. 333-144093) of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. of our reports dated February 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of SkyTerra Communications, Inc.and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

February 25, 2010
Argued and submitted July 31, 2001,

affirmed May 1, 2002

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JOHN ALLEN WALTERS, aka JJ Walters, *Appellant.*

99120245C, 0003231C; A110353 (Control), A110354

(Cases Consolidated)

45 P3d 489

Meredith Allen, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was David E. Groom, State Public Defender.

Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Johnston,*176 Or App 418, 31 P3d 1101 (2001).
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

January 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 132877 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE KALIE RAHE, Minor.

_____________ _______________ _____________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 132877 COA: 270232

TAWNIE M. RAHE, Respondent-Appellant. Ingham CC Family Division: 00-056071-NA

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 26, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
    Dated: March 24, 2009
    By:
    /s/ DAVID E. OLSONDavid E. OlsonChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,
Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 17

- 5454

_____________________________ R OBERT S AGER , Petitioner ,

v.
F LORIDA C OMMISSION ON O FFENDER R EVIEW , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Wri t of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

January 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.
R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and
au thorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Robert Sager, pro se , Petitioner

. Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee , for Respo ndent

.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Name of Subsidiary:............   ICOS Systems GmbH
Jurisdiction of                   Germany
Organization:..................   ICOS Systems Computer Vertriebs GmbH

Name Under Which Doing
Business.......................

                                  IKOS Systems, Ltd.
Name of Subsidiary:............   United Kingdom
Jurisdiction of                   IKOS Systems, Limited
Organization:..................

                                  IKOS Systems K.K.
Name Under Which Doing
Business.......................

                                  Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa
Name of Subsidiary:............   IKOS Systems Kabushiki Kaisha

Jurisdiction of                   IKOS (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Organization:..................   India
Name Under Which Doing
Business.......................

                                  IKOS (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Name of Subsidiary:............
Jurisdiction of
Organization:..................
Name Under Which Doing
Business.......................
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           61810
<SECURITIES>                                     33200
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2495
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                107140
<PP&E>                                            6330
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  132523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            24174
<BONDS>                                            377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      107872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    132523
<SALES>                                          33652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 33652
<CGS>                                            21541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    21541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    39
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  14790
<INCOME-TAX>                                      5472
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          128
<NET-INCOME>                                      9445
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>