alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          692174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 16260565
<ALLOWANCES>                                    198476
<INVENTORY>                                    3144321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              20802069
<PP&E>                                        20549533
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6479637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                42557142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8986753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      18508561
<OTHER-SE>                                    14449167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  42557142
<SALES>                                        8721280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              14474548
<CGS>                                          2178165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6197072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7245398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 41132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1078016
<INCOME-TAX>                                    366526
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             711490
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    711490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
### ATTACHMENT 2 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

TO: County Clerk County of Ventura

800 South Victoria Avenue
Ventura, CA 93009

FROM: Ventura County Air Pollu tion Control District 669 County Square Drive
Ventura, CA 93003

DATE: March 10, 2009

Project Title: Rule 70, Storage and Transfer of Gasoline

Project Location -- Specific: District Wide

Project Location -- City: Project Location -- County : See above Ventura County

Description of Project: Rule 70 regulates vapor recovery systems at gasoline dispensing facilities. The revised rule provides an exemption from Phase II vapor r ecovery for fleets equipped with Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery (ORV R). It also provides an exemption from Phase II vapor recovery for E85 (ethanol) fueling facilities.l A restriction is placed on standing gasoline in Phase I spill containment devices. There is a new requirement for the daily inspection of hanging hardware and a new requirement for permit holders to submit test results within 14 days. The effective date of the revised rule is April 1, 2009.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Ventura County Air Pollu tion Control District Date Approved: March 10, 2009

Name of Person or Agen cy Carrying Out Project: Ventura County Air Pollu tion Control District

Exempt Status: Categorical Exemption pursuant to S ection 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Reasons Why Project Is Exempt:

Revisions to Rule 70 involve an action where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. No exceptions to this categorical exemption apply.

Contact Person: Donald R. Price, Ventura Count y Air Pollution Control District Telephone: (805) 645-1407

Michael Villegas

Air Pollution Control Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.4

                            PAGEMART WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------
                                                     NUMBER                PERCENT           EQUIVALENT
                                                    OF SHARES            OUTSTANDING           SHARES
                                                   ----------            -----------        ------------
<S>                                                <C>                   <C>                <C>
COMMON STOCK

From Founders' Stock                                2,300,000                 100.00%          2,300,000
Stock Options Exercised                             1,057,725                  84.70%            895,871
Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock          15,310,943                 100.00%         15,310,943
1994 Common Stock Offerings                        11,242,857                 100.00%         11,242,857
1995 Common Stock Offerings                         4,323,874                 100.00%          4,323,874
1996 Common Stock Offerings                         6,000,000                 100.00%          6,000,000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued             90,641                  89.27%             80,916
Warrants Exercised                                     48,300                 100.00%             48,300
                                                   ----------                               ------------
                                                   40,374,340                                 40,202,761

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                           40,202,761

NET LOSS                                                                                    $(44,485,195)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                          $     ($1.11)
                                                                                            ============
</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 22, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00705

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.A.T

.,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 02779

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s final order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Appellant ’ s court

- appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. See In re RR , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944 ( Tex. App.

— San Antonio, May 21, 2003, order) (holding that Anders procedures apply to appeals from orders terminating parental rights), disp. on merits , 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio, Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.)(mem. op.). Counsel states he has provi ded cop ies of

the brief and motion to withdraw to appellant and informed appellant of her right to review the

record and file her own brief. See id. ; Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85

- 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio, July 23, 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 92 4 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). In addition, counsel has provided appellant a form motion to use t o request access to the record. Appellant has not requested the record.

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we order that she do so by January 12, 201 5

. If appellant files a timely pro se brief, appellee may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days after appellant ’ s pro se brief is filed in this court. Alternatively, if appellant does not fi le a timely pro se brief, appellee may file a brief in response to counsel ’ s brief no later than

Febru ary 2 , 2015 . We further order the motion to withdraw filed by appellant ’ s counsel is held in abeyance pending further order of the court.

We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant and all

counsel.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, James C. Mroczkowski, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Merchants;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-115(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2004

              /s/ James C. Mroczkowski
              -------------------------------------------------
              James C. Mroczkowski
              Chief Financial Officer

                                       44
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

             List of Subsidiaries of Olympus Communications, L.P./1/

OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS, L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership)

   ADELPHIA CABLE PARTNERS, L.P. (99.98% general partnership interest) (a
   Delaware limited partnership)

       Key Biscayne Cablevision (50% general partnership interest) (a
       Pennsylvania general partnership)

       Southeast Florida Cable, Inc. (a Florida corporation)

           Mercom of Florida, Inc. (a Florida corporation)

           Palm Beach Group Cable Inc. (a Florida corporation)

               Palm Beach Group Cable Joint Venture (50% general partnership
               interest) (a Florida general partnership)

       South Florida Cable Advertising (14.28571% general partnership
interest) (a Florida general partnership)

       Timotheos Communications, L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership)/2/

   ADELPHIA TELECOM OF FLORIDA, INC. (a Delaware corporation)

   FT MYERS ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (a Delaware limited partnership)

       Ft Myers/Gateway LLC (a Delaware limited liability company)

   LEADERSHIP ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (99.9% general and limited
   partnership interests held by Olympus and its wholly-owned subsidiaries) (a
   Delaware limited partnership)

   NATIONAL CABLE ACQUISITION ASSOCIATES, L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership)

       Telemedia Investment Partnership, L.P. (75% general partnership
       interest)(a Delaware limited partnership)

   OLYMPUS CAPITAL CORPORATION (a Delaware corporation)

   OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING, LLC (a Delaware limited liability company)

   TELESAT ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (99.9% general and limited
   partnership interests held by Olympus and its wholly-owned subsidiaries) (a
   Delaware limited partnership)

   WEST BOCA ACQUISITION L.P. (99.9% general and limited partnership interests
   held by Olympus and its wholly-owned subsidiaries) (a Delaware limited
   partnership)

       Starpoint, Limited Partnership (50.36% limited partnership interest) (a
Pennsylvania limited partnership)

           Cable Sentry Corporation (a Florida corporation)

           Automatic Alarms Company, Inc. (a Florida corporation)
----------------------
/1/ Ownership of subsidiaries is indicated by indentations. Ownership of each
    subsidiary is 100% unless otherwise indicated parenthetically or by
    footnote.

/2/ Adelphia Cable Partners, L.P. and Olympus Communications, L.P. own 99.9% and
    .1%, respectively, of the partnership interests of Timotheos Communications,
    L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership).
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 16, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00573-CV

RADIANT DARKSTAR PRODUCTION, LLC, Appellant

V.

PHILIP B. SAUER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02152

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans

Opinion by Justice Lang

This is an appeal from the trial court’s April 4, 2013 order overruling Radiant Darkstar 

Productions, LLC’s motion to dissolve prejudgment writs of garnishment and emergency motion 

to release funds deposited in the registry of the court. Because it appeared these interlocutory 

orders were unappealable, we directed the parties to file letter briefs addressing our jurisdiction 

over the appeal. See In re Tex. Am. Express, Inc., 190 S.W.3d 720, 727 (Tex. App.—2005, orig. 

proceeding) (“As a general rule, writs and orders issued to aid judgment creditors in collecting 

on their judgments are not appealable.”). In its letter brief, Radiant Darkstar stated it had also 

filed a petition for writ of mandamus and had brought the appeal “in an abundance of caution” in 

the event certain portions of the challenged orders were determined to be injunctive in nature. 

See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2012) (allowing appeal 

from interlocutory order of district court granting or refusing a temporary injunction or granting 
–2–

or overruling a motion to dissolve temporary injunction). By opinion filed June 25, 2013, the 

Court conditionally granted Darkstar’s petition for writ of mandamus, specifically finding 

Darkstar has no adequate remedy at law. See In re Radiant Darkstar Prod., L.L.C., 05-13-

00586-CV, 2013 WL 3239672 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 25, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). 

Because the complained of orders are unappealable interlocutory orders and in light of this 

Court’s June 25th opinion, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Tex. Am. 

Express, 190 S.W.3d at 727.

130573F.P05

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

RADIANT DARKSTAR PRODUCTION, 

LLC, Appellant

No. 05-13-00573-CV V.

PHILIP B. SAUER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02152.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices 

Myers and Evans participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Philip B. Sauer recover his costs of this appeal from appellant 

Radiant Darkstar Production, LLC.

Judgment entered this 16th day of July, 2013.

 

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE September 30, 1998
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF Eagle Capital International, Ltd. AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000947431
<NAME>                                  Eagle Capital International, Ltd.
                                        (formerly IAC, Inc.)

       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998          
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998       
<CASH>                                       0          
<SECURITIES>                                 0          
<RECEIVABLES>                                0         
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0         
<INVENTORY>                                  0         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0         
<PP&E>                                       0         
<DEPRECIATION>                               0         
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               0         
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,652         
<BONDS>                                      0         
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0         
<PREFERRED>                            300,000         
<COMMON>                             1,997,918         
<OTHER-SE>                             754,986         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 0         
<SALES>                                      0         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             0         
<CGS>                                        0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           39,349         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              0        
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0        
<DISCONTINUED>                               0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0         
<CHANGES>                                    0         
<NET-INCOME>                           (39,349)         
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (0.02)        
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.01)           
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21



Subsidiaries of The Sands Regent



|                              |  |                           |  |             
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------
|Name                          |  | Entity Type               |  | Jurisdiction
|Zante, Inc.                   |  | corporation               |  | Nevada      
|                              |  |                          
|Last Chance, Inc.             |  | corporation               |  | Nevada      
|                              |  |                          
|California Prospectors, Ltd.* |  | limited liability company |  | Nevada      

---

|(*) |  | Equity interest held directly by Last Chance, Inc.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------
# COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 

### 2024 KW 0110 VERSUS KENDAL DOLLAR 

### MARCH 22, 2024 In Re: Kendal Dollar, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 23rd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Assumption, No. 

### 23306. BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. PMC CHH SMM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         167,076
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  63,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (50,642)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         5,546,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,242,995)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,526,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        4,381,508
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (39,584)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,526,072
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               868,771
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               587,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               84,839
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             461,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (264,658)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (264,658)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (264,658)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (32.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (32.67)
        
<FN>
NOTE: TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS AND TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE
BECAUSE REGISTRANT DOES NOT PRESENT A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Bob Oakland BROOKS, Appellee.

No. 73-95.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 10, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; A. J. Hoseman, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.