alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard L. Leza certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge, the Annual Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.



|                                                                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 19, 2007                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                        
|/S/    RICHARD L.
LEZA                                                                                                  
|Richard L. Leza Chief Executive Officer and President (Interim), and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
#### REDWING CARRIERS, INC., a corp., et al. v. CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORP., a corp., et al.

77-66.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 31, 1978.

*1204John R. Matthews, Jr., C. Winston Shee-han, Jr. of Ball, Ball, Duke & Matthews, J. Douglas Harris of Harris & Harris, Montgomery, for appellants.

James W. Garrett, Jr. and James T. Up-church, III, Montgomery, for appellees, Crown Central Petroleum Corp., et al.

FAULKNER, Justice.

On December 10, 1974, pursuant to a request from Crown, Redwing delivered gasoline to a Crown station. While filling one of the storage .tanks, a tank overflowed, and fumes were ignited by a concealed pilot light on a space heater in the station. Stephenson, a Crown employee, was severely burned and brought suit- against Redwing. The suit was settled for $87,500.00, and Redwing brought suit in Montgomery County Circuit Court seeking indemnity or contribution from the employer, Crown. Crown’s motion to dismiss was granted, and Redwing appeals. We affirm.

In seeking indemnity or contribution from Crown, Redwing alleged active negligence in Crown’s breach (through its agent) of its duty to have its premises in a reasonably safe condition and to provide Red-wing’s driver with proper assistance and instructions and contends that its own driver was, at most, guilty of passive negligence. However, Redwing’s attempt to distinguish this case from *Sherman Concrete Pipe Machinery, Inc. v. Gadsden Concrete & Metal Pipe Co., Inc.,*335 So.2d 125 (Ala.Sup.Ct. 1976) and *Gunter*v. *United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.,*340 So.2d 749 (Ala.Sup.Ct.1976) is no longer viable in light of this court’s recent decision, *Paul Krebs & Associates v. Matthews & Fritts Construction Co., Inc.,*356 So.2d 638 (Ala.Sup.Ct.1978). There we held as a matter of statutory construction that under Tit. 26, § 272, Code of Ala.1940 (Recomp.1958), “. . . no employer shall be held civilly liable for injuries to workmen injured in the course of his employment. To allow a third-party tort-feasor to recover over against the employer for injury to an employee would be to allow indirectly what is prohibited directly.”

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY,. JJ., concur:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                                                    THREE MONTHS
                                        YEAR ENDED        YEAR ENDED     YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED     YEAR ENDED       ENDED
                                       DECEMBER 31,      DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,    MARCH 31,
                                           1997             1998(1)        1999           2000           2001           2002
                                       ------------      ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------  ------------
<S>                                    <C>               <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>
Earnings:
  Net loss ........................     $ (43,887)        $ (59,316)     $ (99,867)     $(117,801)     $(107,903)     $  (7,533)
  Add:  Amount of
     previously capitalized
     interest amortized ...........            --               252          2,288          2,288          2,288            572
  Add: Fixed charges ..............        38,499            43,798         65,310         65,649         35,076          2,686
                                        ---------         ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
  Adjusted earnings ...............        (5,388)          (15,266)       (32,269)       (49,864)       (70,539)        (4,275)

Fixed charges:
  Interest in
     indebtedness .................        36,672            52,645         63,452         63,418         32,316          2,125
  Amortization of debt
     issuance costs ...............           844             1,172          1,291          1,992          1,317            237
  Interest portion
     of rental and
     lease expense ................           983             1,428            567            239          1,443            324
                                        ---------         ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
  Fixed charges ...................        38,499            55,245         65,310         65,649         35,076          2,686

Deficiency of
  earnings available to
  cover fixed charges .............     $ (43,887)        $ (70,511)     $ (97,579)     $(115,513)     $(105,615)     $  (6,961)
                                        =========         =========      =========      =========      =========      =========

Earnings to fixed charges ratio ...            --                --             --             --             --             --
</Table>

(1) The fixed charge adjustment to earnings excludes $11.4 million of
    capitalized interest.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1221 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1221

 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 25, 2013

  Ms. Mikulski (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA.

    The heading of subsection (c) of section 219 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Special Rules for Certain 
Married Individuals'' and inserting ``Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal 
IRA''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Evergreen Solar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard M. Feldt,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard M. Feldt
-----------------------------
Richard M. Feldt
Chief Executive Officer
May 2, 2005
PROMISSORY NOTE





From:  Global Tech International, Inc.



To:    Longborough Capital, PLC.



Date:  May 10, 2010



Amount: 250,242.21GBP





Global Tech International, Inc promises to pay to the order of Longborough Capital, PLC,  Two hundred fifty thousand two hundred forty-two and 00/21 British Pounds (250,242.21) GBP.  This note is unsecured, bears no interest and has not set maturity date. This note replaces the note dated December 15, 2003.



Global Tech International, Inc.



By: /s/ Majlinda Xhuti

Its: Chief Financial Officer
-  HIPAA for Professionals 
-  Regulatory Initiatives 
-  Privacy      -  Summary of the Privacy Rule 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Combined Text of All Rules 
  -  HIPAA Related Links 
-  Security      -  Summary of the Security Rule 
  -  Security Guidance  
  -  Cyber Security Guidance 
-  Breach Notification      -  Breach Reporting 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  Regulation History 
-  Compliance & Enforcement      -  Enforcement Rule 
  -  Enforcement Process 
  -  Enforcement Data 
  -  Resolution Agreements 
  -  Case Examples 
  -  Audit 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  State Attorneys General 
-  Special Topics      -  HIPAA and Part 2 
  -  Change Healthcare Cybersecurity Incident FAQs 
  -  HIPAA and COVID-19 
  -  HIPAA and Reproductive Health        -  HIPAA and Final Rule Notice 
  -  HIPAA and Telehealth 
  -  HIPAA and FERPA 
  -  Research 
  -  Public Health 
  -  Emergency Response 
  -  Health Information Technology 
  -  Health Apps 
-  Patient Safety      -  Statute & Rule        -  PSQIA Statute 
    -  Patient Safety Rule 
  -  Enforcement 
  -  Guidance 
-  Covered Entities & Business Associates      -  Business Associate Contracts 
  -  Business Associates 
-  Training & Resources 
-  FAQs for Professionals 
-  Other Administrative Simplification Rules 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# Numbers at a Glance

(As of October 31, 2015)

**Topics on this page:**
                            - Status of All Privacy Rule Complaints
                            - Total Investigated Resolutions
                            - Investigated Resolutions

----

 

** Referrals to DOJ - 563*

Back to Top

----

 

 

Back to Top

----

 

This bar graph shows a comparison of the complaints that OCR has investigated and resolved by calendar year according to the type of closure, and includes a bar reflecting the total closures.  The first bar in the group of three per year represents the complaints closed in which there was no violation, the second in which there was corrective action, and the third reflects the total closures.

 

Back to Top

 

Content last reviewed June 7, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        602,547
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,717,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                  106,536
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2,627,837
<PP&E>                                      2,040,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                117,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             13,828,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,084,179
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          65,904
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       99,609
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,474,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               13,828,801
<SALES>                                     1,973,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,973,482
<CGS>                                         948,554
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,716,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23,997
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             60,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1,767,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   82,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1,684,531)
<DISCONTINUED>                                990,878
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                (693,653)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.09)


</TABLE>
### David Carl Williams (Pro Se) 1 

### Global Arms and Ammunition 28-37th StreetN.E., Suite A 2 

### Auburn, Washington 98002 Telephone: (206) 325-9400 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 In

### the Matter of 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. ) DOCKET NUMBERFAA-2014-0320 GLOBAL ARMS AND AMMUNITION ) FAA CASE NUMBER2012NM710034 ) 

### ) ) RESPONDENT'S ANSWER ) )



# _________________________) To: Your Honor: Respondent Global Arms and Ammunition answers Complainant FAA's Complaint:

Admit.

1. 

### Admit. 2. 

### Deny. 3. 

### Admit. 4. 

### Admit. 

### 5. Admit. 6. Admit. 7. 

### Admit. 8. 

### Deny. Respondent's Answer Global Arms and Ammunition- 20l2NM710034 DMS No. FAA-2014-0320. Page I of3. 

### FACTS I.



### II.

Tel: 206-325-9400 Global Arms and Ammunition David CarlWilliams (ProSe)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 

### 9. Admit. 10. 

### Deny. III. 

### I. a. Deny. b. Deny. c. Deny. d. Deny. e. Deny. f. 

### Deny. g. Deny. h. Deny. 1. 

### Deny. J. 

### Deny. 2. 

### Deny. 3. Deny. 

### AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES By way ofaffirmative defenses, Respondent Global Arms and Ammunition (hereon Global Arms) alleges as follows: I. Complainant's Complaint may fail, in whole or inpart, to state claims upon which relief canbe granted. 2. Complainant's claims may bebarred, in whole or in part, bythe acts or omissions of FedEx Corporation overwhom Global Arms had no control orright to control. 3. Complainant's claims may be barred, inwhole or inpart, bythe acts or omissions of otherthirdparties over whom Global Arms hadno control or right to control. 4. Complainant may have failed tojoinnecessary and indispensable parties. Respondent's Answer Global Anns and Ammunition- 2012NM710034 DMS No. FAA-2014-0320. Page 2 of3. Tel: 206-325-9400 Global Arms and Ammunition David Carl Williarus (ProSe)1 

### PRAYERFORRELIEF 2 WHEREFORE, Global Arms and Ammunition respectfully request: 3 I. That the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice and without cost; 4 2. That Global Arms and Ammunition be awardedreasonable fees and cost incurred in 5 defending this action; 6 3. For such other and further reliefthis Court deemsjust and equitable under the 7 circumstances. 8 DATED this 14'h day ofOctober, 2014. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Respondent's Answer Global Arms and Ammunition- 2012NM710034 DMS No. FAA-2014-0320. Page 3 of3. David Carl Williams (Pro Se) Global Arms and Ammunition

Tel: 206-325-9400 Global Arms and Ammunition David Carl Williams (Pro Se)
EXHIBIT 32.1


           CERTIFICATION OF M. H. MCILVAIN, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,
            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned officer of American Resources Resources, Inc. hereby certifies
that (a) American Resource's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of American Resources.


Date: January 15, 2008                       /s/ M. H. MCILVAIN
                                             ----------------
                                             M. H. McIlvain
                                             Exec. Vice President, and Chief
                                             Financial Officer,
                                             American Resource Technologies, Inc




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to American
Resource Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by American Resource
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                           8,712
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                     71,781
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,799
<PP&E>                                         858,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                 489,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 629,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,253
<BONDS>                                        580,492
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,594
<OTHER-SE>                                   (236,387)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   629,494
<SALES>                                        406,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               406,047
<CGS>                                          384,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  384,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,991)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,054)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,054)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (4.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.71)


</TABLE>
-  HIPAA for Individuals      -  HIPAA & Reproductive Health 
  -  Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders 
  -  Your Rights Under HIPAA        -  Your Medical Records 
    -  Employers and Health Information in the Workplace 
    -  Personal Representatives 
    -  Family Members and Friends 
    -  Court Orders and Subpoenas 
    -  Notice of Privacy Practices 
    -  Right to Access 
    -  HIV and HIPAA 
  -  FAQs 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# Will this HIPAA Privacy Rule make it easier for police and law enforcement agencies to get my medical information? 

## Answer:

No. The Rule does not expand current law enforcement access to individually identifiable health information. In fact, it limits access to a greater degree than currently exists, since the Rule establishes new procedures and safeguards that restrict the circumstances under which a covered entity may give such information to law enforcement officers. 

For example, the Rule limits the type of information that covered entities may disclose to law enforcement, absent a warrant or other prior process, when law enforcement is seeking to identify or locate a suspect. It specifically prohibits disclosure of DNA information for this purpose, absent some other legal requirements such as a warrant. Similarly, under most circumstances, the Privacy Rule requires covered entities to obtain permission from persons who have been the victim of domestic violence or abuse before disclosing information about them to law enforcement. 

In most States, such permission is not required today. Where State law imposes additional restrictions on disclosure of health information to law enforcement, those State laws continue to apply. This Rule sets a national floor of legal protections; it is not a set of “best practices.” Even in those circumstances when disclosure to law enforcement is permitted by the Rule, the Privacy Rule does not require covered entities to disclose any information. Some other Federal or State law may require a disclosure, and the Privacy Rule does not interfere with the operation of these other laws. However, unless the disclosure is required by some other law, covered entities should use their professional judgment to decide whether to disclose information, reflecting their own policies and ethical principles. In other words, doctors, hospitals, and health plans could continue to follow their own policies to protect privacy in such instances.

**Learn More:**

When does the Privacy Rule allow covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials? 

Created 12/20/02

Content last reviewed January 9, 2023