alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 99 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 6, 2013. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 933) 

making appropriations for the Department of Defense, the 

Department of Veterans Affairs, and other departments and 

agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, and 

for other purposes. All points of order against consideration 

of the bill are waived. The amendment printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall 

be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 

bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 

amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
2 

•HRES 99 EH 

Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiaries of The Sands Regent



|                              |  |                           |  |             
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------
|Name                          |  | Entity Type               |  | Jurisdiction
|Zante, Inc.                   |  | corporation               |  | Nevada      
|Last Chance, Inc.             |  | corporation               |  | Nevada      
|California Prospectors, Ltd.* |  | limited liability company |  | Nevada      
|Plantation Investments, Inc.  |  | corporation               |  | Nevada      



---

|(*) |  | Equity interest held directly by Last Chance, Inc.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Mark T. Detillion

Mark T. Detillion
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)May 15, 2009
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Dismi ssed and Opinion Filed April 28, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05

- 20

- 00146

- CV
MARTHA MELENDEZ , Appellant

V. ALMARIE PEOPLES EDDI E , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 18

- 05857

- A
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Molberg, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Molberg The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated February 4, 2020, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of th e appeal. Also by postcard dated February 4, 2020, we informed appellant the docketing

statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal. By

lett er dated April 10, 2020, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been– 2

–

filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, (1) verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the

clerk’ s record, or (2) written documentation that appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so

would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, pr ovided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b),
(c).

200146f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
MARTHA MELENDEZ, Appellant

No. 05

- 20

- 00146

- CV V.
ALMARIE PEOPLES EDDIE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 18

- 05857

- A. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices Schenck and Nowell participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee ALMARIE PEOPLES EDDIE recover her cost s of this appeal from appellant MARTHA MELENDEZ.

Judgment entered this 28 th day of April, 2020.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jerry Paul FRANCIS.

No. 60810.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

T. Barrett Harrington, Charles T. Everett, Crowley, for defendant-appellant.

*1360William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Nathan Stansbury, Dist. Atty., Jack Derrick Miller, Asst. Dist. Atty., Rayne, for plaintiff-appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1017 

To permit flexibility in the application of the budget sequester by Federal 

agencies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Budget 

A BILL 

To permit flexibility in the application of the budget 

sequester by Federal agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION. 

4 In this Act, the term ‘‘agency’’ means— 

5 (1) an Executive agency (as defined in section 

6 105 of title 5, United States Code); 

7 (2) an office, agency, or other establishment in 

8 the legislative branch which is not a part of another 

9 office, agency, or other establishment in the legisla10 tive branch; and 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1017 IS

1 (3) an office, agency, or other establishment in 

2 the judicial branch which is not a part of another of3 fice, agency, or other establishment in the judicial 

4 branch. 

5 SEC. 2. FLEXIBLE SEQUESTER IMPLEMENTED BY AGENCY 

6 HEADS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, the budget sequester for an account in the 

9 security and non-security categories required by section 

10 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 

11 Control Act of 1985 for fiscal year 2013 shall be imple12 mented within each account as determined by the head 

13 of the agency with spending authority over such account. 

14 (b) APPROPRIATIONS OVERSIGHT.—The head of an 

15 agency may not exercise the authority provided in sub16 section (a) unless the head has submitted a notice of im17 plementation describing the proposed exercise of authority 

18 to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses not 

19 later than 5 days before exercising such authority. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1250

   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 
 operation of certain visitor facilities associated with, but outside 
    the boundaries of, Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of 
                               Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 15 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 
 operation of certain visitor facilities associated with, but outside 
    the boundaries of, Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of 
                               Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``The Fall River Visitor Center Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS OUTSIDE AUTHORIZED BOUNDARY OF ROCKY 
              MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK.

    (a) Visitor Center.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to 
expend donated or appropriated funds for the operation and maintenance 
of a visitor center to be constructed for visitors to and 
administration of Rocky Mountain National Park with private funds on 
the privately owned lands described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Parcels of Land.--The lands referred to in 
subsection (a) are described as follows:
            Being land owned by H.W. Stewart, Incorporated, and more 
        particularly described as follows:
                    Beginning at the southwest corner of the north one-
                half of section 16, township 5 north, range 73 west of 
                the sixth principal meridian, Colorado; thence south 
                eighty-seven degrees six minutes east, eight hundred 
                and fifty-four feet; thence north two degrees west, 
                three hundred and forty-six and one-tenth feet to the 
                south boundary of the right-of-way of U.S. Highway 34; 
                thence northwesterly along said south boundary nine 
                hundred and sixty feet to the west line of said section 
                16; thence south along the west line of said section 16 
                to the point of beginning.

                                 <all>
```
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 
  Section 1350

I, Tony J. Giuliano, acting as Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Sand Technology Inc., hereby
certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended July 31,
2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended and that the information contained in
the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Sand Technology Inc.

Date: November 7, 2011

| | By: | /s/ TONY J. GIULIANO                                
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------
| |     | Tony J. Giuliano                                    
| |     | Vice-President, Finance and
      Administration and
| |     | Chief Financial Officer                             

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for
any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

---
NO. 07-00-0484-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	APRIL 23, 2001

	______________________________

	SHELLY JO HORACEK,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 42672-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	Shelly Jo Horacek attempts to appeal from an order deferring her adjudication and

placing her on community supervision.  The order was entered pursuant to her plea of

guilty.  Furthermore, the trial court’s decision comported with the terms of the plea bargain. 

On appeal, appellant asserts three points of error which implicate the voluntariness of her

plea and the constitutionality of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure art. 42.12, § 5.   We

dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

	Appellant, having pled guilty and the trial court having abided by the plea agreement, was obligated to file a notice of appeal comporting with Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 25.2(b)(3).  In other words, the notice of appeal must state that 1) the

appeal involves jurisdictional defects, 2) the substance of the appeal was raised by written

motion which the court ruled on before trial, or 3) the court granted permission to appeal. 

However, the document filed by appellant is a general notice of appeal which contains

none of the aforementioned statements.  Being such, it did not vest this court with

jurisdiction.  Lowe v. State, 997 S.W.2d 670, 672 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1999, no pet.); see Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 715 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (requiring that the notice of one appealing after the adjudication of his guilt is deferred must also comply with Rule

25.2(b)(3)).  Furthermore, the time allotted appellant to amend the notice expired once she

filed her brief on December 18, 2000.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

	Next, the recent opinion from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Cooper v. State, No. 1100-99 (Tex. Crim. App. April 4, 2001) would also prevent us from entertaining the allegation that her plea was involuntary.  According to the court in Cooper, such an issue cannot be reviewed when an appellant pleads guilty and the trial court abides by the

plea agreement.  Id.  Since those circumstances appear here, we would again lack jurisdiction to consider those issues raised by appellant regarding the voluntariness of her

plea.

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

								Per Curiam

Do not publish.
**Exhibit 31****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Richard E. Gaetz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vitran Corporation Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of the registrant’s Board of Directors:a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 18, 2006     /s/ RICHARD E. GAETZ     Richard E. Gaetz
p. 1



# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 95 ) IV-C-6 1 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:56

AM Sheet 95of 232P. 2 

## fr-8-7-J4- UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO NAGENC Y 

# y!^ > -t£-.c-c / * mjrn&l S UNITE

D b 1 A lt atr t

vmui-inn,i- 1 A Lrn ui I Yp Z.* WASHINGTON , D.C . 20460 

### FE B 

### 8 198

8

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Do n Sundquis t Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Sundquist : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r January25 , 198 8 lette r relayin g th e concern s o f on e o f you r constituents , Mr . Verno n Jenkins , regarding EPA' s regulatoryproposa l t o requir e onboar d canister s o n ne wvehicle s t o contro l refueling emissions . T o assis t yo u wit hyou r response , I hav e enclose d a copyo f ou r proposa l fo r you r review . Sectio n E (page s 31177-31182 ) explain s EPA' s overal l rational e fo r proposin g onboar d controls . I f yo u woul d lik e furthe r detail s o f ou r analysis , pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso n o f th e Standard s Developmen t and Suppor t Branc ho f th e Emissio n Contro l TechnologyDivision , 256 5 Plymout hRoad , An n Arbor , Michiga n 4810 5 (FT S 374-827 0 o r Commercia l (313 ) 668-4270) . Thank yo u fo r you r letter . W e wil l plac e th e lette r fromMr . Jenkin s i n ou r publi c docke t an d full yconside r hi s comment s i n th e nex t phas e o f ou r rulemaking process . Sincerel yyours , C?.lG'N MS'.oMED-B

Y Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s Enclosur e cc : Docke t A-87-1 1 Prepare d by : For

mLetter:sal:2/3/88:AL88040 3 - ECTD , Ann Arbor , M I bcc : Regio n 0 4 Congressiona l Liaison/Quin n
REVISION A • 09/01/2008 

# UNIVAIR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION 2500 Himalaya Road, Aurora, Colorado 80011 PHONE

...................................... 303-375-8882 FAX

........................................... 303-375-8888 EMAIL

.................................. info@univair.com WEBSITE

.............................. www.univair.com

MSM 

# Service and Maintenance Manual 

# MOONEY M10

Serial Numbers 690001 thru 690011 and 700001 and onREVISION A • 09/01/2008

REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008

REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008REVISION A • 09/01/2008
#### William Beason MORRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-623.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2022171EN.01003902.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/39

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — WO v European Public Prosecutor’s Office

(Case T-603/21 R)

(Application for interim measures - Law governing the institutions - Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Lithuania - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 171/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: WO (represented by: V. Vitkovskis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of Decision No 28/2021 of the College of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 21 April 2021 rejecting the applicant’s candidacy for the position of European Delegated Public Prosecutor.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, John Ueberroth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b)
or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
| |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ John A. Ueberroth

John A. Ueberroth
Chief Executive Officer
November 6, 2003

21