alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 19, 2019

No. 04-19-00119-CV

INFINITY COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

Michael TATSCH,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12977

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction is carried with the 

appeal.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 134 (Thursday, July 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14928]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-18-2018]

Production Activity Not Authorized; Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 26--
Atlanta, Georgia; PBR, Inc. d/b/a SKAPS Industries (Non-Woven 
Geotextiles); Athens, Georgia

    On March 9, 2018, PBR, Inc. d/b/a SKAPS Industries (SKAPS) 
submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ 
Board for its facility within FTZ 26--Site 29, in Athens, Georgia.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (83 FR 13473, March 29, 2018). On July 
9, 2018 the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that 
further review of the activity is warranted. The production activity 
described in the notification was not authorized. If the applicant 
wishes to seek authorization for this activity, it will need to submit 
an application for production authority, pursuant to Section 400.23.

    Dated: July 9, 2018.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14928 Filed 7-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
#### A. C. TOLBERT and Dorothy Tolbert v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49911.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 16, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1977.

William T. Bailey, Lucedale, for appellants.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Scherry J. LeSieur, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; Merle F. Palmer, Judge.

CONVICTION IS AFFIRMED AS TO DOROTHY TOLBERT AND THE CONVICTION OF A. C. TOLBERT IS REVERSED AND HE IS REMANDED TO THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF OF GREENE COUNTY TO AWAIT ACTION OF NEXT GRAND JURY.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
Order entered November 26, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01623-CV

IN RE BARCEL USA, LLC, Relator

On Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-03517-C

ORDER

The Court has before it Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The Court requests that 

Real Party in Interest and Respondent file any responses by December 9, 2013.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1050 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1050

  To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in 
       Dallas, Texas, as the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 27 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

Mr. Mitchell (for Mr. Krueger) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in 
       Dallas, Texas, as the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in Dallas, 
Texas, is designated as the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record, map, or other 
paper of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 is 
deemed to be a reference to the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                 PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VPGI Corp. (the
 "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
 and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick A.
 Custer, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
 Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S1350, as adopted pursuant to S906
 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


 October 13, 2005

                               /s/    PATRICK A. CUSTER
                               ------------------------------------
                                    Patrick A. Custer
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 165
          - [Docket Number USCG-2018-0578]
          - RIN 1625-AA00

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Coast Guard is correcting a final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 12, 2018. The Coast Guard issued a final rule republishing its 2014 rule that established a permanent safety zone on the navigable waters of Port Valdez within a 200-yard radius of the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) Port Valdez Ferry Terminal.                    

# DATES:

Effective July 19, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

                        To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to                         *http://www.regulations.gov,*                         type USCG-2018-0578 in the “SEARCH” box and click “SEARCH.” Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have questions about this rulemaking, call or email LTJG, Carlos M. Quintero, MSU Valdez, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 907-835-7209, email                         *Carlos.M.Quintero@uscg.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR 2018-14863 appearing on page 32208 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Thursday, July 12, 2018, the following correction is made:                

§ 165.1712a 

1. On page 32209, in the second column, in part 165, in amendment 2, the section heading “§ 165.1712a Safety Zone; Alaska Marine Highway System Port Valdez Ferry Terminal, Port Valdez, Valdez, AK.” is corrected to read “§ 165.1714 Safety Zone; Alaska Marine Highway System Port Valdez Ferry Terminal, Port Valdez, Valdez, AK.”. 

Date: July 16, 2018.

Katia Kroutil,

Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-15438 Filed 7-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

SUMMIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Computation of Earnings Per Share
(Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                       Three Months Ended            Six Months Ended
                                                             June 30,                    June 30,
                                                       1997           1996           1997          1996
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
    Weighted average shares outstanding             10,359,065     9,153,849       10,353,351     8,512,379
    Net effect of dilutive stock options--based
     on the treasury stock method                            -             -                -             -
                                                   ---------------------------  ---------------------------
                                                    10,359,065     9,153,849       10,353,351     8,512,379
                                                   ---------------------------  ---------------------------
    Net loss                                       $(6,309,068)   $ (222,210)   $(10,807,115)   $ (473,614)
                                                   ---------------------------  ---------------------------
    Net loss per share                             $     (0.61)   $    (0.02)   $      (1.04)   $    (0.06)
                                                   ---------------------------  ---------------------------
 
 FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
    Weighted average shares outstanding             10,359,065     9,153,849      10,353,351     8,512,379
    Net effect of dilutive stock options--based
     on the treasury stock method                            -             -               -            -
                                                   ---------------------------  ---------------------------
                                                    10,359,065     9,153,849      10,353,351    8,512,379
                                                   ---------------------------  ---------------------------
     Net loss                                      $(6,309,068)   $ (222,210)   $(10,807,115)  $ (473,614)
                                                   ---------------------------  ---------------------------
     Net loss per share                            $     (0.61)   $    (0.02)   $      (1.04)  $    (0.06)
                                                   ---------------------------  ---------------------------
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royce Biomedical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31,2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joseph C. Sienkiewicz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 17, 2005                         /s/ Joseph C. Sienkiewicz
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Joseph C. Sienkiewicz
                                                    Chief Financial Officer


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Royce Biomedical, Inc. and will be retained by Royce Biomedical,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
Argued and submitted April 26,

reversed and remanded for new trial May 29, 2002

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*SCOTT EARL MIDDLEMISS, *Appellant.*

9909-49687, 9907-46385; A110658 (Control), A110659

(Cases Consolidated)

47 P3d 528

David E. Groom, Public Defender for Oregon, and Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Michael J. Slauson, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*659PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010; resisting arrest, ORS 162.315; and failure to appear, ORS 133.075.1 Defendant appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in permitting the trial to proceed without first determining whether he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. The state acknowledges that the courts have held on numerous occasions that waiver of counsel requires that the difficulties of self-representation and the benefits of being represented by an attorney be made known to a defendant before a waiver will be considered knowing and voluntary. *See, e.g., State v. Meyrick,*313 Or 125, 831 P2d 666 (1992). The state further concedes that the record in this case does not reveal that defendant was advised about the dangers of self-representation. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and therefore accept it.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

1

 ORS 133.075 has since been repealed and renumbered as ORS 133.076. *See*Or Laws 1999, ch 1051, § 63.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 33943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, Center for Genetic Studies (7797).
    Date: July 25, 2018.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Gerald L. McLaughlin, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Policy and Review, National Institute 
on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 4238, MSC 9550, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9550, 301-827-5819, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1d6dc808584d0f1dfd8d99fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9aea4f8fdfca889a7a0a1e7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No.: 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 12, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-15279 Filed 7-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1201

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide cost share assistance

to construct reservoir structures for the storage of water in rural areas,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. HEFLIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide cost

share assistance to construct reservoir structures for the

storage of water in rural areas, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COST SHARE ASSISTANCE FOR RESERVOIRS

4 FOR RURAL WATER SUPPLY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Watershed Protection and

6 Flood Prevention Act is amended by inserting after section

7 3A (16 U.S.C. 1003a) the following new section:
2

•S 1201 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 3B. COST SHARE ASSISTANCE FOR RESERVOIRS FOR

2 RURAL WATER SUPPLY.

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the other require4 ments of this section, the Secretary may provide the Fed5 eral share of the cost of constructing a reservoir structure

6 for the storage of water to increase the water supply in

7 a rural area. The Federal share shall be not less than 50

8 percent, as determined by the Secretary.

9 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—The cost of increasing the water

10 supply of a rural area in connection with a project assisted

11 under subsection (a), excluding the cost of constructing

12 main water transmission lines, may not exceed 50 percent

13 of the total cost of the project.

14 ‘‘(c) PURPOSE.—In order to qualify for assistance

15 under this section, a project must increase the supply of

16 water in an agricultural or rural community in a rural

17 area that is experiencing a severe problem with the quality

18 or quantity of water.

19 ‘‘(d) RURAL AREA.—As used in this section, the term

20 ‘rural area’ means any area other than an area within a

21 standard metropolitan statistical area (based on the most

22 recent decennial census of the United States).’’.

23 (b) DEFINITION OF WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT.—Sec24 tion 2 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 1002) is amended by strik25 ing ‘‘Each project must contain’’ and all that follows

26 through ‘‘benefits of the project.’’.
3

•S 1201 IS

Æ
#### Clara B. TESTON, Appellant, v. Lonnie TESTON, Appellee.

No. 72-511.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130585 (53) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MICHAEL FRANCIS SPITZLEY, Personal Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the ESTATE OF DAVID A. Justices SPITZLEY,
 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130585 

 COA: 255345 
 Clinton CC: 03-009578-CZ 

THOMAS P. SPITZLEY and KIMBERLY S. 

SPITZLEY,
 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 12, 

2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows: 

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement in Spitzley v Spitzley, 477 

Mich ___ (2007), I would grant the motion for reconsideration, reverse the judgment of 

the Court of Appeals, and strike the sanctions against defendants. 

KELLY and CORRIGAN, JJ., join the statement of MARKMAN, J. 

t0314 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 21, 2007 

 Clerk
# C_2022463EN.01004002.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2022 — Associação do Socorro e Amparo v EUIPO — De Bragança (quis ut Deus)

(Case T-752/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark quis ut Deus - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 463/57)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Associação do Socorro e Amparo (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J. Motta Veiga, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: I. Ribeiro da Cunha and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Duarte Pio De Bragança (Sintra, Portugal)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 October 2021 (Case R 581/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 October 2021 (Case R 581/2021-4) in so far as it annulled in part the decision of the Cancellation Division of 29 January 2021; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 October 2021 (Case R 581/2021-4) in so far as it annulled in part the decision of the Cancellation Division of 29 January 2021;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Associação do Socorro e Amparo. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Associação do Socorro e Amparo.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.

---