alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carol S. JACK (Beloff) and Barry Beloff, her husband, Appellants, v. NORTHSIDE MOTORS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-298.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 31, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 28, 1972.

Wilson, Burns & Browd, Miami, for appellants.

Adams, George & Wood and David L. Willing, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla.Stat. § 713.58, F.S.A.; Gallucci v. Milavic, Fla.1958, 100 So.2d 375; Goldstein v. Sabella, Fla. 1956, 88 So.2d 910.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 25, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 25, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25A0194. PAULA POP v. JOHN WATTS, JR. et al .
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1207 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2013 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. CORNYN, and 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cameras in the Court5 room Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 28. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 45 of title 28, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the fol9 lowing: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1207 IS

1 ‘‘§ 678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings 

2 ‘‘The Supreme Court shall permit television coverage 

3 of all open sessions of the Court unless the Court decides, 

4 by a vote of the majority of justices, that allowing such 

5 coverage in a particular case would constitute a violation 

6 of the due process rights of 1 or more of the parties before 

7 the Court.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis 

9 for chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 

10 by inserting at the end the following: 

‘‘678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
-  HIPAA for Professionals 
-  Regulatory Initiatives 
-  Privacy      -  Summary of the Privacy Rule 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Combined Text of All Rules 
  -  HIPAA Related Links 
-  Security      -  Summary of the Security Rule 
  -  Security Guidance  
  -  Cyber Security Guidance 
-  Breach Notification      -  Breach Reporting 
  -  Guidance 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  Regulation History 
-  Compliance & Enforcement      -  Enforcement Rule 
  -  Enforcement Process 
  -  Enforcement Data 
  -  Resolution Agreements 
  -  Case Examples 
  -  Audit 
  -  Reports to Congress 
  -  State Attorneys General 
-  Special Topics      -  HIPAA and Part 2 
  -  Change Healthcare Cybersecurity Incident FAQs 
  -  HIPAA and COVID-19 
  -  HIPAA and Reproductive Health        -  HIPAA and Final Rule Notice 
  -  HIPAA and Telehealth 
  -  HIPAA and FERPA 
  -  Research 
  -  Public Health 
  -  Emergency Response 
  -  Health Information Technology 
  -  Health Apps 
-  Patient Safety      -  Statute & Rule        -  PSQIA Statute 
    -  Patient Safety Rule 
  -  Enforcement 
  -  Guidance 
-  Covered Entities & Business Associates      -  Business Associate Contracts 
  -  Business Associates 
-  Training & Resources 
-  FAQs for Professionals 
-  Other Administrative Simplification Rules 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# Numbers at a Glance

(As of September 30, 2019)

**Topics on this page:**
                          - Status of All Privacy Rule Complaints
                          - Total Investigated Resolutions
                          - Investigated Resolutions

----

 

** Referrals to DOJ - 786*

Back to Top

----

 

Back to Top

----

This bar graph shows a comparison of the complaints that OCR has investigated and resolved by calendar year according to the type of closure, and includes a bar reflecting the total closures.  The first bar in the group of three per year represents the complaints closed in which there was no violation, the second in which there was corrective action, and the third reflects the total closures.

 

Back to Top

Content last reviewed November 15, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1195 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1195

                 To repeal the renewable fuel standard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2013

 Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. 
 Cruz, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Scott) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 To repeal the renewable fuel standard.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Renewable Fuel Standard Repeal 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD.

    Section 211 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545) is amended by 
striking subsection (o).

SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL REPEAL.

    Section 204 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 
U.S.C. 7545 note; Public Law 110-140) is repealed.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the regulations 
under subparts K and M of part 80 of title 40, Code of Federal 
Regulations (as in effect on that date of enactment), shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1146 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to protect States that have in 

effect laws or orders with respect to pay-to-play reform, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2013 

Mr. KIRK (for himself, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to protect States 

that have in effect laws or orders with respect to payto-play reform, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Ethics Law Pro5 tection Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAY-TO-PLAY REFORM. 

7 Section 112 of title 23, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1146 IS

1 ‘‘(h) PAY-TO-PLAY REFORM.—A State transportation 

2 department shall not be considered to have violated a re3 quirement of this section solely because the State in which 

4 that State transportation department is located, or a local 

5 government within that State, has in effect a law or an 

6 order that limits the amount of money an individual or 

7 entity that is doing business with a State or local agency 

8 with respect to a Federal-aid highway project may con9 tribute to a political party, campaign, candidate, or elected 

10 official.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Leonard ANTHONY, Appellant, v. E. Charles GENTER, d/b/a Results Detective Agency, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-487.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 11, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000947429
<NAME> INTERNATIONAL WIRE GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          25,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,101)
<INVENTORY>                                     72,428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,069
<PP&E>                                         298,825
<DEPRECIATION>                               (141,317)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 588,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,321
<BONDS>                                        335,664
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   588,089
<SALES>                                        428,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               428,201
<CGS>                                          317,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  317,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,515
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,553
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,747)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,818
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
257 La. 617

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry CLARK v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51152.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1971.

In re: Henry Clark applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The record reflects that relator, to avoid exposure to the death penalty on two counts of aggravated rape, pleaded guilty under a plea bargain, with the advice of two attorneys, to two counts of attempted rape, receiving 20 years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. The application before us (he has filed three separate applications in the trial court) consists only of argument and conclusions which are refuted by the record. Relator makes no factual statement which warrants either the issuance of the writ or *533an evidentiary hearing. Relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

HAMLIN, J., is of the view that, considering the record as a whole, the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction.
#### CHAPMAN CONTRACTING COMPANY, formerly known as W. H. Williams Company, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CAPITAL NATIONAL BANK OF TAMPA, a national banking association, Appellee.

No. 71-807.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 15, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000755465
<NAME>                        Sandata, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    $

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                          1,229,718
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,756,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                      447,782
<INVENTORY>                                        17,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,374,635
<PP&E>                                         19,178,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,266,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,245,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,941,669
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            2,506
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,284,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,245,499
<SALES>                                        17,987,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               18,597,321
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,150,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                243,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   203,257
<INCOME-TAX>                                      189,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                14,099
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       14,099
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .01



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony J. LUCERO, Jr.

No. 53502.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1973.

In re: Anthony J. Lucero, Jr., applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Application denied. The trial judge has not abused his discretion.

BARHAM and TATE, JJ., are of the opinion that the order should be modified so as to require the examination in Lake Charles so as to avoid endangering the applicant’s life.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of income, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             774
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,486
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     27,682
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          29,792
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            30,325
<LOANS>                                         58,199
<ALLOWANCE>                                        692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,470
<DEPOSITS>                                     103,240
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,708
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 126,470
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,699
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,742
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   499
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,940
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,512
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,512
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,428
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       32
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  54
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,315
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,315
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       763
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,505
<LOANS-PAST>                                       254
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   660
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  692
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               692
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021338EN.01001401.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Justice de paix du canton de Forest (Belgium) lodged on 4 June 2021 — ZG v Beobank SA

(Case C-351/21)

(2021/C 338/17)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Justice de paix du canton de Forest

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ZG

Defendant: Beobank SA

Questions referred

| 1. | Under Article 38(a) of Directive 2007/64/EC, (1) is the payment service provider under a best endeavours obligation or an obligation of result regarding the provision of ‘information relating to the payee’? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Under Article 38(a) of Directive 2007/64/EC, (1) is the payment service provider under a best endeavours obligation or an obligation of result regarding the provision of ‘information relating to the payee’?

| 2. | Does the ‘information relating to the payee’ referred to in that provision include information from which the natural or legal person that received the payment can be identified? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the ‘information relating to the payee’ referred to in that provision include information from which the natural or legal person that received the payment can be identified?

---

(1)  Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC (OJ 2007 L 319, p. 1).

---
#### Terry O. GRUBB, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42686.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 28, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 264 So.2d 141.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated November 9, 1998 included in this Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended October 2, 1998 into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-8, Registration Nos. 33-11818, 33-30879, 33-33329,
33-44002, 33-57825 and 333-53163, and on Form S-3, Registration Nos. 33-47564,
333-53161, and 333-63427.





Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    November 25, 1998
# C_2020161EN.01004901.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/49

---

Action brought on 2 March 2020 — Ardex v EUIPO — Chen (ArtiX PAINTS)

(Case T-136/20)

(2020/C 161/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Ardex GmbH (Witten, Germany) (represented by: C. Becker, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lian Chen (Seseña Nuevo, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark ArtiX PAINTS — Application for registration No 16 825 614

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 November 2019 in Case R 2503/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the procedural rules derived from Article 24 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the procedural rules derived from Article 24 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626;

| — | Infringement of the procedural rules derived from Article 7(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the procedural rules derived from Article 7(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Breach of the principle of the right to a fair hearing; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of the principle of the right to a fair hearing;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Ex parte Terry Lynn Heath

No. 06-18-00127-CR

Appeal from the 276th District Court of 

Titus County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 40031). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Appellant is entitled to the relief 

sought. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Terry Lynn Heath’s Article 17.151 

petition for habeas corpus relief and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings 

consistent with this opinion. The mandate in this case shall issue immediately.

We further order that the appellee pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED AUGUST 15, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk