alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. ESTEBAN CORNELIO-LEGARDA, Defendant - Appellant. No. 20-8033 (D.C. No. 2:07-CR -00239-SWS-1) (D. Wyo.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before MATHESON , BACHARACH , and CARSON , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ This matter is before the court on the government’s Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings , by which it requests that this appeal be remanded to the U.S. District Court for the Dist rict of Wyoming for further proceedings consistent with this court’s decisions in United States v. McGee , No. 20-5047 (10th Cir. Mar. 29, 2021), and United States v. Maumau , No. 20-4056 (10th Cir. Apr. 1, 2021). Upon consideration, the court grants the motion, dismisses this appeal, and remands the case to the di strict court for further pr oceedings consistent with United

* This order and judgment is not bi nding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judica ta, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consiste nt with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### April 5, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court2 States v. McGee , No. 20-5047 (10th Cir. Mar. 29, 2021), and United States v.
Maumau , No. 20-4056 (10th Cir. Ap r. 1, 2021), including, if appropriate, vacating the May 27, 2020 Order Dismissing De fendant’s Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam
IC 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1171 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2014 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow a veterinarian to transport and dispense controlled substances 

in the usual course of veterinary practice outside of 

the registered location. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1171 RFH

1 SECTION 1. TRANSPORTING AND DISPENSING CON2 TROLLED SUBSTANCES IN THE USUAL 

3 COURSE OF VETERINARY PRACTICE. 

4 Section 302(e) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

5 U.S.C. 822(e)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(e)’’ and inserting ‘‘(e)(1)’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a registrant 

10 who is a veterinarian shall not be required to have a sepa11 rate registration in order to transport and dispense con12 trolled substances in the usual course of veterinary prac13 tice at a site other than the registrant’s registered prin14 cipal place of business or professional practice, so long as 

15 the site of transporting and dispensing is located in a 

16 State where the veterinarian is licensed to practice veteri17 nary medicine and is not a principal place of business or 

18 professional practice.’’. 

Passed the Senate January 8, 2014. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                             157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   666804
<ALLOWANCES>                                     30384
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                            4786
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  649131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         353350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      124842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    649131
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                109867
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    66908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               36392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  42959
<INCOME-TAX>                                     15900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              27059
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     27059
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2022284EN.01001101.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov — Romania) — SR v EW

(Case C-196/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents - Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 - Article 5 - Translation of the document - Translation costs borne by the applicant - Concept of ‘applicant’ - Service, by the court before which proceedings have been brought, of judicial documents on interveners in the proceedings)

(2022/C 284/10)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Ilfov

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SR

Defendant: EW

Interveners: FB, CX, IK

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000, must be interpreted as meaning that, where a court orders the transmission of judicial documents to third parties that apply for leave to intervene in the proceedings, that court cannot be regarded as being the ‘applicant’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 263, 5.7.2021.

---
[No. 401-2.

Division Two.

July 29, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Henry Otto Melich, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 39152, William F. LeVeque, J., entered October *9152, 1970. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 706 

Raising a question of the privileges of the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2014 

Mr. JONES (for himself and Mr. MASSIE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Raising a question of the privileges of the House. 

Whereas H.R. 1123, the Unlocking Consumer Choice and 

Wireless Competition Act, was introduced on March 13, 

2013; 

Whereas the Committee on the Judiciary marked up and ordered the bill reported, with strong bipartisan support, on 

July 31, 2013; 

Whereas the suspension version of the bill included new language to prohibit the bulk unlocking of cellular phones; 

Whereas the changes made to the bill fundamentally altered 

the substance of the underlying bill; 

Whereas the report of the Committee on the Judiciary on the 

bill was filed in the House on February 25, 2014; and 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 706 IH 

Whereas the bill was passed under suspension of the rules on 

the night of February 25, 2014: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives dis2 approves of the actions taken by the Committee on the 

3 Judiciary and the leadership of the House of Representa4 tives with respect to H.R. 1123 and directs the leadership 

5 of each committee of the House and the leadership of the 

6 House to operate in a matter that maximizes transparency 

7 and public trust. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Sandata, Inc.

We  consent to the  reference  to our firm under the  caption  "Experts"  in the
Registration  Statements on (Form S-8) and (Form S-3) and related  prospectus of
Sandata Inc. and to the  incorporation by reference  therein of our report dated
August 13, 1997 with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements included
in its Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31,  1997,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                       MARCUM & KLIEGMAN, LLP

                                                     /s/ Marcum & Kliegman, LLP

Woodbury, New York
August 29, 1997

<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 24.2**

 

 

**Power of Attorney**

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESEPRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Harris Ravineand David Kirwan the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact andagents, each with full power and substitution for the undersigned and in theundersigned’s name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign FischerImaging Corporation’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2004 (the “Form 10-K”) and any or all amendments to theForm 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and otherdocuments in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,granting unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power andauthority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite andnecessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents andpurposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying andconfirming all that either of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or hissubstitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereto.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed as of this31st day of March, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/  LARRY  E. LENIG JR |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   | Signature                         |
|   |                              |
|   | Larry  E. Lenig Jr.               |
|   | Print  Name:                      |

 

----
# C_2022340EN.01003302.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — Zdút v EUIPO — Nehera and Others (nehera)

(Case T-250/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark NEHERA - Absolute ground for invalidity - No bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2022/C 340/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ladislav Zdút (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: Y. Echevarría García, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, interveners before the General Court: Isabel Nehera, (Sutton, Ontario, Canada), Jean-Henri Nehera (Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada), Natacha Sehnal, (Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) (represented by: W. Woll, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 March 2021 (Case R 1216/2020-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 March 2021 (Case R 1216/2020-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 March 2021 (Case R 1216/2020-2);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and those incurred by Mr Ladislav Zdút, including the necessary costs incurred in the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and those incurred by Mr Ladislav Zdút, including the necessary costs incurred in the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal;

| 3. | Declares that Ms Isabel Nehera, Mr Jean-Henri Nehera and Ms Natacha Sehnal are to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that Ms Isabel Nehera, Mr Jean-Henri Nehera and Ms Natacha Sehnal are to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 278, 12.7.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,937,507
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,875,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 24,984,386
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,068,584
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,007,495
<LOANS>                                     73,781,779
<ALLOWANCE>                                    971,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             110,330,172
<DEPOSITS>                                 101,120,472
<SHORT-TERM>                                   925,434
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,128,739
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,495,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,390
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,655,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             110,330,172
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,261,512
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,236,254
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                90,255
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,588,021
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,433,916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,642,939
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,945,082
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  180,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,218,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                823,880
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     546,718
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   546,718
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.77
<LOANS-NON>                                    471,380
<LOANS-PAST>                                   554,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               842,328
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   88,133
<RECOVERIES>                                    37,015
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              971,210
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           971,210
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Order entered November 26, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01623
- CV
IN RE BARCEL USA, LLC, Relator On Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 13
- 03 517
- C



### O RDER The Court has before it Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The Court requests that Real Party in Interest and Respondent file any responses by December 9, 2013. /s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
Presidential Documents

31641 

Federal Register 

Vol. 83, No. 131 

Monday, July 9, 2018 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 9766 of July 3, 2018 

Honoring the Victims of the Tragedy in Annapolis, Maryland 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Our Nation shares the sorrow of those affected by the shooting at the 

Capital Gazette newspaper in Annapolis, Maryland. Americans across the 

country are united in calling upon God to be with the victims and to 

bring aid and comfort to their families and friends. As a mark of solemn 

respect for the victims of the terrible act of violence perpetrated on June 

28, 2018, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States 

by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby 

order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the 

White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military 

posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government 

in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, July 3, 2018. I also direct that the 

flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United 

States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of 

July, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-second. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14744 

Filed 7–6–18; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3295–F8–P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCSTrump.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Gillette Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
W. Cramb, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Charles W. Cramb
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Charles W. Cramb
                                          Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                          Officer


Date:  November 1, 2002
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.


         Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of International Wire Group,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  August 14, 2003                           /s/ GLENN J. HOLLER
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Name: Glenn J. Holler
Title: Chief Financial Officer
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 747 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there be support 

for a referendum on the independence of the Kurdish region of Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mrs. LUMMIS, 

Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. 

GOHMERT, Mr. JONES, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. LONG, and Mr. HUNTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

there be support for a referendum on the independence 

of the Kurdish region of Iraq. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) there should be a referendum by the 

4 Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq to deter5 mine whether Kurdistan should become an inde6 pendent and sovereign country by its people; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 747 IH 

1 (2) the United States Government should recog2 nize and abide by the results of such a referendum. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS