Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 52187 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1138; fax 425–227–1149. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- 

AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. 

(i) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 

2007–06–12, Amendment 39–14993 (72 FR 

12555, March 16, 2007), are approved as 

AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of 

paragraph (i) of this AD. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer, the action must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 

116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or 

the European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design 

Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by 

the DOA, the approval must include the 

DOA-authorized signature. 

(l) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2013–0016, dated 

January 16, 2013, for related information. 

You may examine the MCAI in the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0061-0002. 

(2) Service information identified in this 

AD that is not incorporated by reference is 

available at the addresses specified in 

paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD. 

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–3127, 

Revision 02, dated December 7, 2011, 

including Appendix 01. 

(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–3143, 

Revision 05, dated May 29, 2012, including 

Appendix 01. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness 

Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 

31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 

5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email 

airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; 

Internet http://www.airbus.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

7, 2014. 

Victor Wicklund, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–19725 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0794; Directorate 

Identifier 2012–NM–157–AD; Amendment 

39–17936; AD 2014–16–12] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault 

Aviation Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all 

Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 

2000EX airplanes. This AD was 

prompted by a revision to the airplane 

airworthiness limitations to introduce a 

corrosion prevention control program, 

among other changes, to the 

maintenance requirements and 

airworthiness limitations. This AD 

requires revising the maintenance or 

inspection program to include the 

maintenance tasks and airworthiness 

limitations specified in the 

airworthiness limitations section of the 

airplane maintenance manual. We are 

issuing this AD to prevent reduced 

structural integrity of the airplane. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

October 8, 2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in this AD 

as of October 8, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0794; or in 

person at the Docket Management 

Facility, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC. 

For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, 

P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ 

07606; telephone 201–440–6700; 

Internet http://www.dassaultfalcon.com. 

You may view this referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1137; 

fax 425–227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to all Dassault Aviation Model 

FALCON 2000EX airplanes. The NPRM 

published in the Federal Register on 

September 25, 2013 (78 FR 58973). 

The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 

for the Member States of the European 

Community, has issued EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2012–0157, 

dated August 23, 2012 (referred to after 

this as the Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the 

MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition 

for the specified products. The MCAI 

states: 

The airworthiness limitations and 

maintenance requirements for the Falcon 

2000EX type design are included in Dassault 

Aviation Falcon 2000EX (F2000EX) Aircraft 

Maintenance Manual (AMM) chapter 5–40 

and are approved by the European Aviation 

Safety Agency (EASA). EASA issued AD 

2008–0221 [http://ad.easa.europa.eu/ad/

2008-0221.pdf] to require accomplishment of 

the maintenance tasks, and implementation 

of the airworthiness limitations, as specified 

in Dassault Aviation F2000EX AMM chapter 

5–40 at revision 3. 

Since that [EASA] AD was issued, Dassault 

Aviation issued F2000EX AMM chapter 5–40 

at revision 7, which introduces new or more 

restrictive maintenance requirements and/or 

airworthiness limitations. 

Dassault Aviation AMM chapter 5–40 

revision 7 contains among other changes the 

following requirements: 

—Inspection and test of horizontal stabilizer 

jackscrew; 

—Test of various components of the 

electrical power system; 

—Revised Time Between Overhaul for 

screwjack of flap actuators -3 version; 

—Revised interval for checking the screw/nut 

play on screwjack of flap actuators -3 

version; 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
52188 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

—Removal of service life limit for screwjack 

of flap actuators; 

—Test of flap asymmetry protection system. 

F2000EX AMM chapter 5–40 at revision 7 

introduces extended inspection interval; 

—Tests of the auto brake system; 

— Inspection procedures of fuselage and 

wings; 

— Check of overpressure tightness on 

pressurization control regulating valves. 

Compliance with this check is required by 

EASA AD 2008–0072 [http://

ad.easa.europa.eu/ad/2008-0072.pdf]. 

F2000EX AMM chapter 5–40 at revision 7 

introduces extended inspection interval. 

The maintenance tasks and airworthiness 

limitations, as specified in the F2000EX 

AMM chapter 5–40, have been identified as 

mandatory actions for continued 

airworthiness of the F2000EX type design. 

Failure to comply with AMM chapter 5–40 

at revision 7 might constitute an unsafe 

condition. 

For the reasons described above, this 

[EASA] AD requires the implementation of 

the maintenance tasks and airworthiness 

limitations, as specified in Dassault Aviation 

F2000EX AMM chapter 5–40 at revision 7. 

You may examine the MCAI in the 

AD docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0794- 

0002. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comments 

received on the proposal (78 FR 58973, 

September 25, 2013) and the FAA’s 

response to each comment. 

Request To Withdraw the NPRM (78 FR 

58973, September 25, 2013) 

An anonymous commenter stated that 

Dassault Aviation has taken appropriate 

steps to ensure that operators have 

sufficient knowledge and awareness of 

the corrosion prevention control 

program and that the maintenance 

manual includes the requirements of the 

proposed AD (78 FR 58973, September 

25, 2013). The commenter declared that 

all operators are likely including the 

actions in the proposed AD into their 

maintenance programs, even though the 

actions are not mandated by an AD. The 

commenter also stated that ‘‘ . . . any 

structural inspection of moderate detail 

already highlights specific critical areas 

(like the stabilizer actuator) so yet 

another avenue to enforce inspections of 

this nature is ludicrous.’’ We infer that 

the commenter is requesting that the 

NPRM be withdrawn. 

We do not agree to withdraw the 

NPRM (78 FR 58973, September 25, 

2013). Although an airplane 

manufacturer’s maintenance manual 

includes corrosion control inspections, 

with appropriate approval, operators are 

allowed to deviate from those 

procedures for their maintenance 

programs. This AD addresses the unsafe 

condition related to uncontrolled 

corrosion by requiring operators to 

include the manufacturer’s maintenance 

procedures in the operators’ 

maintenance program. No change has 

been made to this AD regarding this 

issue. 

Request To Revise the NPRM (78 FR 

58973, September 25, 2013) Based on 

New Service Information 

Dassault requested the NPRM (78 FR 

58973, September 25, 2013) be revised 

to refer to Chapter 5–40, Airworthiness 

Limitations, DGT 113877, Revision 9, 

dated February 2013, of the Dassault 

Falcon 2000EX Maintenance Manual. 

We agree with the commenter’s 

request and have updated paragraph (g) 

of this AD accordingly. We have also 

included a new paragraph (j) in this AD 

to give credit for the actions required by 

paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions 

were done before the effective date of 

this AD using Chapter 5–40, 

Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 113877, 

Revision 8, dated July 2012, of the 

Dassault Falcon 2000EX Maintenance 

Manual. We have redesignated 

subsequent paragraphs accordingly. 

Request To Remove the Terminating 

Action 

Dassault commented that paragraph 

(h) of the proposed AD (78 FR 58973, 

September 25, 2013) was ‘‘not suited.’’ 

Paragraph (h) of the proposed AD stated 

that ‘‘Accomplishing paragraph (g) of 

this AD terminates the requirements of 

paragraph (g) of AD 2010–26–05, 

Amendment 39–16544 (75 FR 79952, 

December 21, 2010), for Dassault 

Aviation Model FALCON 2000EX 

Airplanes.’’ Paragraph (g) of the 

proposed AD proposed to require 

revising the maintenance or inspection 

program by incorporating the 

information specified in Chapter 5–40, 

Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 113877, 

Revision 8, dated July 2012, of the 

Dassault Falcon 2000EX Maintenance 

Manual. The commenter stated that the 

repetitive inspection interval of 1,640 

flight hours was the same in the service 

information referenced in the NPRM 

and in FAA AD 2010–26–05. We infer 

that the commenter is requesting that 

paragraph (h) of the proposed AD be 

removed because it is unnecessary. 

We do not agree that paragraph (h) of 

the proposed AD (78 FR 58973, 

September 25, 2013) should be omitted 

from this AD. We are providing relief for 

operators of Dassault Aviation Model 

FALCON 2000EX airplanes by allowing 

them to terminate the actions required 

by paragraph (g) of AD 2010–26–05, 

Amendment 39–16544 (75 FR 79952, 

December 21, 2010), and instead doing 

the actions required by paragraph (g) of 

this AD. If we did not include paragraph 

(h) in this AD, operators of Dassault 

Aviation Model FALCON 2000EX 

airplanes would have to show 

compliance with both paragraph (g) of 

AD 2010–26–05 and paragraph (g) of 

this AD. Paragraph (h) of this AD 

removes that redundancy. No change 

has been made to this AD in this regard. 

‘‘Contacting the Manufacturer’’ 

Paragraph in This AD 

Since late 2006, we have included a 

standard paragraph titled ‘‘Airworthy 

Product’’ in all MCAI ADs in which the 

FAA develops an AD based on a foreign 

authority’s AD. 

We have become aware that some 

operators have misunderstood or 

misinterpreted the Airworthy Product 

paragraph to allow the owner/operator 

to use messages provided by the 

manufacturer as approval of deviations 

during the accomplishment of an ADmandated action. The Airworthy 

Product paragraph does not approve 

messages or other information provided 

by the manufacturer for deviations to 

the requirements of the AD-mandated 

actions. The Airworthy Product 

paragraph only addresses the 

requirement to contact the manufacturer 

for corrective actions for the identified 

unsafe condition and does not cover 

deviations from other AD requirements. 

However, deviations to AD-required 

actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, 

and anyone may request the approval 

for an alternative method of compliance 

to the AD-required actions using the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

To address this misunderstanding and 

misinterpretation of the Airworthy 

Product paragraph, we have changed the 

paragraph and retitled it ‘‘Contacting the 

Manufacturer.’’ This paragraph now 

clarifies that for any requirement in this 

AD to obtain corrective actions from a 

manufacturer, the action must be 

accomplished using a method approved 

by the FAA, EASA, or Dassault 

Aviation’s EASA DOA. 

The Contacting the Manufacturer 

paragraph also clarifies that, if approved 

by the DOA, the approval must include 

the DOA-authorized signature. The DOA 

signature indicates that the data and 

information contained in the document 

are EASA-approved, which is also FAAapproved. Messages and other 

information provided by the 

manufacturer that do not contain the 

DOA-authorized signature approval are 

not EASA-approved, unless EASA 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 52189 

directly approves the manufacturer’s 

message or other information. 

This clarification does not remove 

flexibility previously afforded by the 

Airworthy Product paragraph. 

Consistent with long-standing FAA 

policy, such flexibility was never 

intended for required actions. This is 

also consistent with the 

recommendation of the Airworthiness 

Directive Implementation Aviation 

Rulemaking Committee to increase 

flexibility in complying with ADs by 

identifying those actions in 

manufacturers’ service instructions that 

are ‘‘Required for Compliance’’ with 

ADs. We continue to work with 

manufacturers to implement this 

recommendation. But once we 

determine that an action is required, any 

deviation from the requirement must be 

approved as an alternative method of 

compliance. 

We also have decided not to include 

a generic reference to either the 

‘‘delegated agent’’ or ‘‘design approval 

holder (DAH) with State of Design 

Authority design organization 

approval,’’ but instead we have 

provided the specific delegation 

approval granted by the State of Design 

Authority for the DAH throughout this 

AD. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

with the changes described previously 

and minor editorial changes. We have 

determined that these minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 

58973, September 25, 2013) for 

correcting the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 58973, 

September 25, 2013). 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 18 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Maintenance/inspection program revision ........ 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ................. N/A .............. $85 $1,530 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD will not 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0794; or in 

person at the Docket Management 

Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The AD docket contains this 

AD, the regulatory evaluation, any 

comments received, and other 

information. The street address for the 

Docket Operations office (telephone 

800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES

section. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

2014–16–12 Dassault Aviation: 

Amendment 39–17936. Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0794; Directorate Identifier 

2012–NM–157–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes 

effective October 8, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

Certain requirements of this AD terminate 

the requirements of AD 2010–26–05, 

Amendment 39–16544 (75 FR 79952, 

December 21, 2010), for the airplanes 

identified in paragraph (c) of this AD. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Dassault Aviation 

Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes, 

certificated in any category, all serial 

numbers. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 05, Time Limits/Maintenance 

Checks. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by a revision to the 

airplane airworthiness limitations to 

introduce the corrosion prevention control 

program, among other changes, to the 

maintenance requirements and airworthiness 

limitations. We are issuing this AD to prevent 

reduced structural integrity of the airplane. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
52190 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Revision of Maintenance or Inspection 

Program 

Within 30 days after the effective date of 

this AD, revise the maintenance or inspection 

program, as applicable, to incorporate the 

information specified in Chapter 5–40, 

Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 113877, 

Revision 9, dated February 2013, of the 

Dassault Falcon 2000EX Maintenance 

Manual. The initial compliance time for 

accomplishing the actions specified in 

Chapter 5–40, Airworthiness Limitations, 

DGT 113877, Revision 9, dated February 

2013, of the Dassault Falcon 2000EX 

Maintenance Manual, is within the times 

specified in that maintenance manual, or 30 

days after the effective date of this AD, 

whichever occurs later, except as provided 

by paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) of this AD. 

(1) The term ‘‘landings’’ in the ‘‘First 

Inspection’’ column of any table in the 

service information means total airplane 

landings. 

(2) The term ‘‘flight hours’’ in the ‘‘First 

Inspection’’ column of any table in the 

service information means total flight hours. 

(3) The term ‘‘flight cycles’’ in the ‘‘First 

Inspection’’ column of any table in the 

service information means total flight cycles. 

(4) For task number 52–20–00–610–801–01 

52–205 the initial compliance time is within 

24 months after the effective date of this AD. 

(h) Terminating Action for the Affected AD 

Accomplishing the actions specified in 

paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the 

requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 2010– 

26–05, Amendment 39–16544 (75 FR 79952, 

December 21, 2010), for Dassault Aviation 

Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes. 

(i) No Alternative Actions and Intervals 

After accomplishment of the revision 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no 

alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or 

intervals may be used unless the actions or 

intervals are approved as an alternative 

method of compliance (AMOC) in 

accordance with the procedures specified in 

paragraph (k) of this AD. 

(j) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, 

if those actions were performed before the 

effective date of this AD using Chapter 5–40, 

Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 113877, 

Revision 8, dated July 2012, of the Dassault 

Falcon 2000EX Maintenance Manual. 

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1137; fax 425–227–1149. 

Information may be emailed to: 9–ANM–116– 

AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using 

any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office/certificate holding 

district office. The AMOC approval letter 

must specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer, the action must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 

116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or 

the European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA); or Dassault Aviation’s EASA Design 

Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by 

the DOA, the approval must include the 

DOA-authorized signature. 

(l) Related Information 

Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European 

Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness 

Directive 2012–0157, dated August 23, 2012, 

for related information. This MCAI may be 

found in the AD docket on the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov/

#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0794-0002. 

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Chapter 5–40, Airworthiness 

Limitations, DGT 113877, Revision 9, dated 

February 2013, of the Dassault Falcon 

2000EX Maintenance Manual. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 

2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606; 

telephone 201–440–6700; Internet http://

www.dassaultfalcon.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

1, 2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–19020 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0978; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–120–AD; Amendment 

39–17958; AD 2014–17–05] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 767–400ER 

series airplanes. This AD was prompted 

by reports of turbine wheel bursts in the 

air driven pump (ADP) turbine gearbox 

assembly (TGA), which resulted in the 

release of high energy fragments. This 

AD requires replacing the existing ADP 

TGA with an improved ADP TGA. We 

are issuing this AD to prevent fragments 

from an uncontained turbine wheel 

burst penetrating the fuselage and 

striking passengers, or penetrating the 

wing-to-body fairing and striking 

ground handling or maintenance 

personnel, causing serious injury. 

DATES: This AD is effective October 8, 

2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in this AD 

as of October 8, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, 

MC2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may 

review this referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES