alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lloyd F. GIARDINA and Bon Marche Furniture Co., Inc. v. MARRERO FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. et al.

No. 5998.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 21, 1973.

*580Greenberg, Cohen & Dallam, Nathan Greenberg, Gretna, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Chauppette, Genin, Mendoza & Keeton, Lawrence J. Genin, Marrero, for defendant-appellee.

Monroe & Lemann, H. Sloan McCloskey, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

James A. Manning, Asst. Parish Atty., for defendant-appellee.

Jonathan C. Harris, Baton Rouge, for State of Louisiana, Dept, of Highways, defendant-appellee.

Before REDMANN, GULOTTA and FLEMING, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

After a judgment signed April 23, 1973, dismissing a rule for preliminary injunction, plaintiff moved for a new trial April 25, and after denial of that motion May 21, filed a petition for appeal on May 23.

Obliged to note timeliness of appeals, Orrell v. Southern Farm Bur. Cas. Ins. Co., 248 La. 576, 180 So.2d 710 (1965), we point out that this appeal was not taken within the 15 days “from the date of the order or judgment” allowed by C.C.P. art. 3612. Plaintiff’s application for a new trial did not extend this period; Morris v. Transtates Petr., Inc., 258 La. 311, 246 So.2d 183 (1971).

On our own motion, the appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.


         Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of International Wire Group,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  November 14, 2005                     /s/ RODNEY D. KENT
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Name: Rodney D. Kent
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 19, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00119

- CV

INFINITY COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellant

v.

Michael TATSCH

, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12977

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction is carried with the

appeal.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day o f August, 2019

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
Submitted on record and briefs January 26,

affirmed February 26, 1970

#### NEWTON, *Appellant, v.*CUPP, *Respondent.*

(Case No. 67914)

465 P2d 734

*646Andrew Albert Newton," Jr., *in propria persona,*Salem, for appellant.

Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, Salem, for respondent.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Foley, Judges.

FOLEY, J.

Petitioner is a prisoner in the Oregon State Penitentiary under two concurrent sentences of 10 and 5 years. The validity of these sentences is not contested in these proceedings. Without the aid of counsel he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he is a Negro and has been discriminated against while in the custody of defendant.

He alleged that in a pending assault felony case against him in Marion County Circuit Court, Judge Val D. Sloper had denied his motions before he “had a chance to describer (sic) or explain * * * [them]” and that Judge Sloper held him in contempt of court when “the only thing * * * [he] was trying to do, was protect his rights in court.” He also charged that while he was taken to and from the county courthouse the deputy sheriffs subjected him to mental harassment; that he and another Negro have been charged with assault and battery on prison guards, but white men who did the same thing have not been prosecuted; that he has been ordered into the security and isolation building pending trial of the felony assault charge; that his mother has been barred from visiting him in the security and isolation building; and that his mail has been held up “for quite sometime.” He states these allegations constitute cruel and *647unusual punishment. The trial court, Judge Douglas L. Hay, peremptorily dismissed the petition because it “fads to state facts sufficient to constitute grounds for relief * *

"We agree with the trial court. None of the adegations relate to the legality of petitioner’s present incarceration nor set forth cruel or unusual punishment under any constitutional sanctions. The purpose of the writ of habeas corpus is to inquire into the legality of imprisonment and not to supervise administration of the institution. ORS 34.310; *Grenfell v. Gladden,*241 Or 190, 193, 405 P2d 532 (1965), cert den 382 US 998, 86 S Ct 588, 15 L Ed 2d 486 (1966); *Gibbs v. Gladden,*227 Or 102, 359 P2d 540, cert den 368 US 862, 82 S Ct 105, 7 L Ed 2d 58 (1961).

Petitioner’s other assignments are likewise without merit.

Affirmed.
II 

Calendar No. 504 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1214 

[Report No. 113–236] 

To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the United States 

of America for use by the Federal Government. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2013 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JULY 31, 2014 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the 

United States of America for use by the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘All-American Flag 

5 Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1214 RS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PURCHASE OF DOMESTICALLY 

2 MADE UNITED STATES FLAGS FOR USE BY 

3 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under sub5 section (b), only such flags of the United States of Amer6 ica, regardless of size, that are 100 percent manufactured 

7 in the United States, from articles, materials, or supplies 

8 100 percent of which are grown, produced, or manufac9 tured in the United States, may be acquired for use by 

10 the Federal Government. 

11 (b) WAIVER.—The head of an executive agency may 

12 waive the requirement under subsection (a) on a case-by13 case basis upon a determination that— 

14 (1) the application of the limitation would cause 

15 unreasonable costs or delays to be incurred; or 

16 (2) application of the limitation would adversely 

17 affect a United States company. 

18 (c) AMENDMENT OF FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGU19 LATION.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

20 enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory 

21 Council established under section 1302 of title 41, United 

22 States Code, shall amend the Federal Acquisition Regula23 tion to implement this section. 

24 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1214 RS

1 (1) EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term ‘‘executive 

2 agency’’ has the meaning given the term in section 

3 133 of title 41, United States Code. 

4 (2) FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION.—The 

5 term ‘‘Federal Acquisition Regulation’’ has the 

6 meaning given the term in section 106 of title 41, 

7 United States Code. 

8 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

9 Section 2 shall apply to purchases of flags made on 

10 or after 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

11 Act. 

12 SEC. 4. CONSISTENCY WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREE13 MENTS. 

14 This Act shall be applied in a manner consistent with 

15 United States obligations under international agreements. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 504 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1214 

[Report No. 113–236] 

A BILL 

To require the purchase of domestically made flags 

Federal Government. of the United States of America for use by the 

JULY 31, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Unitil Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned Robert G. Schoenberger, Chief Executive Officer and President, Mark H. Collin, Chief Financial Officer and Laurence M. Brock, Chief Accounting Officer,
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 |  |                                       |  |                   
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|Signature                                        |  | Capacity                              |  | Date              
|                                                 |  |                                      
|/s/ Robert G. SchoenbergerRobert G. Schoenberger |  | Chief Executive Officer and President |  | February 22, 2006 
|                                                 |  |                                      
|/s/ Mark H. CollinMark H. Collin                 |  | Chief Financial Officer               |  | February 22 , 2006
|                                                 |  |                                      
|/s/ Laurence M. BrockLaurence M. Brock           |  | Chief Accounting Officer              |  | February 22, 2006
Interchange  Bank (formerly  known as Interchange  State Bank),  Washington
Interchange Corporation and Clover Leaf Mortgage Company, Inc., all of which are
incorporated  in  New  Jersey,  are  wholly  owned  direct  subsidiaries  of the
Registrant.

     Clover Leaf  Investment  Corporation,  Clover Leaf  Insurance  Agency d/b/a
Interchange  Insurance  Agency  and  Interchange  Capital  Company,  L.L.C.  are
incorporated  in  New  Jersey  and  are  wholly  owned  direct  subsidiaries  of
Interchange  Bank.  Clover  Leaf  Management  Realty  Corporation,  a New Jersey
Corporation,  which  is  also  incorporated  in  New  Jersey,  is 99%  owned  by
Interchange Bank.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:





(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 20013 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 16, 2014/s/Larry VanceLarry VanceChief Executive Officer





This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
# C_2023189EN.01002901.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2023 — Gerhard Grund Gerüste v EUIPO — Josef-Grund-Gerüstbau (Josef Grund Gerüstbau)

(Case T-749/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Josef Grund Gerüstbau - Earlier national figurative mark grund - Relative ground for invalidity - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2023/C 189/37)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Gerhard Grund Gerüste e. K. (Kamp-Lintfort, Germany) (represented by: P. Lee, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Josef-Grund-Gerüstbau GmbH (Erfurt, Germany) (represented by: T. Staupendahl, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2021 (Case R 1925/2020-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gerhard Grund Gerüste e. K. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gerhard Grund Gerüste e. K. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7052 SHARIF ABDUL ALI, a/k/a Vincent Bradford Earl, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; MICHAEL BELL, Superintendent; SUSAN RHYNE-WHITE, Superintendent of Programs; J. JOHNSON, Sgt., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-ct-00948-FL) Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 6, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sharif Abdul Ali, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Sharif Abdul Ali appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ali v. Bennett , No. 5:04-ct-00948-FL (E.D.N.C. May 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT32

Officer Certification under 18 USC 1350

We,the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofAXS-One Inc. (the ‘‘issuer’’), do herebycertify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

|                    |  |                                                                            |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
|               |  | AXS-ONE INC.                                                               |
| Date: May 11, 2006 |  | /s/ William P. Lyons                                                       |
|               |  | William P. LyonsChief Executive OfficerandChairman of the Board            |
|               |  | /s/Joseph Dwyer                                                            |
|               |  | Joseph DwyerExecutive VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer, andTreasurer |
|                    |

----
**Exhibit 7.1****FINANCIAL RATIOS**                      Year ended 31 March **2010**  2009a 2008a 2007a 2006a                **Financial ratios**                    Adjusted basic earnings per shareb – pence  17.3   14.1   20.2   19.1   17.4 Reported basic (loss) earnings per share – pence  13.3   (2.5)  21.5   34.4   18.4 Adjusted return on capital employedb, c (unaudited)  16.0   14.5   17.7   17.6   18.1 Reportedreturn on capitalemployedc (unaudited)  13.3   2.3   14.4   16.5   17.1 Adjusted interest cover before net pension interestd– times (unaudited)  2.9   2.5   3.6   4.2   3.6 Reportedinterest covere – times (unaudited)  0.3   0.5   6.2   27.0   5.3                  a Restated. See page 94 of the Annual Report & Form 20-F 2010. b Adjusted results refer to the results before specific items, the BT Global Services contract and financial review charges in 2009, and net interest on pensions. c The ratio is based on profit before taxation and net finance expense to average capital employed. Capital employed is represented by total assets less current liabilities (excluding corporationtax, currentborrowings, derivative financial liabilities and finance lease creditors) less deferred tax assets, retirement benefit asset, cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial assets and investments. d The number of times net finance expense before net pension interest and specific items is covered by adjusted operating profit. e The number of times reported net finance expense is covered by reported operating profit.
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Sandata, Inc.

We  consent to the  reference  to our firm under the  caption  "Experts"  in the
Registration  Statements on (Form S-8) and (Form S-3) and related  prospectus of
Sandata,  Inc. and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated
August 24, 2000 with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements included
in its Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31,  2000,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

MARCUM & KLIEGMAN, LLP

/ s / Marcum & Kliegman, LLP
#### Charles J. LIVINGSTON & Allstate Insurance Company, a foreign insurance company, Appellants, v. Walter McREYNOLDS, Appellee.

No. Q-237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 7, 1972.

Jon D. White, of Fisher, Hertz & Bell, Pensacola, appellants.

William R. Davenport, Pensacola, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and it appearing that reversible error has not been demonstrated, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





The
      following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Financial Officer
      of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. on the basis of such
      officer's knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2003.





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**





**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Frederick R. Klug, Chief Financial Officer of Merchants and Manufacturers
      Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2003, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.





(1)  The
      Annual Report of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o
      (d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Merchants and Manufacturers
      Bancorporation, Inc.





/s/
                Frederick R. Klug





Name:
                Frederick R. Klug
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
              Date:
                March 15, 2007