alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
<TABLE>
       <S>                                                    <C>
       Name of Subsidiary:------------------------------------IKOS Systems GmbH

       Jurisdiction of Organization:--------------------------Germany

       Name Under Which Doing Business------------------------IKOS Systems Computer Vertriebs GmbH



       Name of Subsidiary:------------------------------------IKOS Systems, Ltd.

       Jurisdiction of Organization:--------------------------United Kingdom

       Name Under Which Doing Business------------------------IKOS Systems, Limited



       Name of Subsidiary:------------------------------------IKOS Systems K.K.

       Jurisdiction of Organization:--------------------------Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa

       Name Under Which Doing Business------------------------IKOS Systems Kabushiki Kaisha


       Name of Subsidiary:------------------------------------IKOS (India) Pvt. Ltd.

       Jurisdiction of Organization:--------------------------India

       Name Under Which Doing Business------------------------IKOS (India) Pvt. Ltd.


       Name of Subsidiary:------------------------------------IKOS Systems SARL.

       Jurisdiction of Organization:--------------------------France

       Name Under Which Doing Business------------------------IKOS Systems SARL
</TABLE>
#### Carrie O’Neal MURRELL et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE of Clinton CASE, by William H. Garland, Administrator, Appellee. Carrie O’Neal MURRELL et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE of Luthera M. CASE, by William H. Garland, Administrator, Appellee.

Nos. 71-739, 71-740.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 2, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 14, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1995
<CASH>                                          35,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  308,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    313,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               662,881
<PP&E>                                         470,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                 440,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 692,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          352,550
<BONDS>                                        285,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000
<COMMON>                                     1,712,635
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,757,441)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   692,936
<SALES>                                      1,000,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,000,021
<CGS>                                          681,518
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  918,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,373
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,373
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                219,356
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   300,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

AMERICAN SURETY CO.

(AGENT ANTONIO MUNOZ, JR.,

D/B/A BORDERLAND BAIL BONDS),

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00260-CV

Appeal from

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2015DBF0007)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a joint motion filed by the parties to vacate the trial court’s 

final order on judgment nisi and render judgment in accordance with the terms of the settlement 

agreement. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The motion is granted. Accordingly, we vacate the 

final order on judgment nisi entered by the trial court on June 25, 2015, and we render judgment 

against Appellant, American Surety Co. (Agent Antonio Munoz, Jr., d/b/a Borderland Bail 

Bonds) in the total amount of $522.79, which includes court costs in the amount of $365.00, 

interest on the bond in the amount of $35.07, attorney’s fees in the amount of $114.38, and staff 

time in the amount of $8.34. 

September 23, 2015

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30, 1999
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EAGLE CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL,LTD. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000947431
<NAME>                                  Eagle Capital International, Ltd.


<S>                              <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                  81,436
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        81,436
<PP&E>                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       5,495,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  370,393
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                              2,497
<COMMON>                                 3,159
<OTHER-SE>                           5,414,214
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         5,495,650
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             0
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       579,283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              0
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                          (579,787)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.03)



</TABLE>
# C_2022463EN.01004701.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/47

---

Order of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — FC v EUAA

(Case T-697/21) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Disciplinary proceedings - Refusal of request to stay disciplinary proceedings pending judgments of the General Court in related cases - Delivery of judgments of the General Court in the related pending cases - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 463/68)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: FC (represented by: V. Christianos, G. Kelepouri and A. Skoulikis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) (represented by: P. Eyckmans and M. Stamatopoulou, acting as Agents, and T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and L. Burguin, lawyers)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) of 25 July 2021 rejecting her complaint against the decisions of the EUAA of 24 February and 14 March 2021, by which the Chairman of the Disciplinary Board of the EUAA refused her request for staying the disciplinary proceedings initiated against her.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | FC shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Asylum. |
| --- | --- |

2.

FC shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Asylum.

---

(1)  OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.

---
#### Richard WILLIAMS, alias Sallahuddin Abdul Taib v. STATE.

6 Div. 676.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 20, 1978.

Darryl C. Hardin of Hardin & Gordon, Tuscaloosa, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Milton E. Belcher, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

TYSON, Judge.

The indictment charged the appellant with the robbery of Banks Sims by taking some $350.00 from his person by putting him in fear, etc. This indictment also charged the appellant in separate counts with assault with intent upon one Banks Sims, a law enforcement officer with the City of Tuscaloosa, and, further, in a still different count, with the robbery of Warehouse Grocery of Tuscaloosa, Inc.

The jury found the appellant guilty of robbery as charged and fixed punishment at ninety-nine years and one day imprisonment in the penitentiary. The trial court then set sentence in accordance with this verdict.

This is a companion case to that of *Moseley v. State,*Ala.Cr.App., 357 So.2d 390 (1978).

The issues asserted for review on appeal in the instant case are the same as those reviewed by this Court in *Moseley,*supra.

The issues are (1) evidence of another offense, which occurred as the appellant and his companions were fleeing the premises of Warehouse Grocery, and (2) whether or not there was a fatal variance between the indictment and proof as to the ownership of the stolen goods. These were fully discussed in *Moseley,*supra.

We have carefully examined this record and find no error therein. This cause is affirmed on the authority of *Moseley v. State,*Ala.Cr.App., 357 So.2d 390 (1978).

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                         JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                     3960754
<SECURITIES>                                              18700679
<RECEIVABLES>                                              9225538
<ALLOWANCES>                                                628000
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          35296736
<PP&E>                                                     3425216
<DEPRECIATION>                                             1471999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            40133086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      6310907
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                    180663
<OTHER-SE>                                                14968846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              40133086
<SALES>                                                   17274652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          17274652
<CGS>                                                      3656063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              8751246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            200000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            5441799
<INCOME-TAX>                                               2258357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        3183442
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               3183442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.20
        
 

</TABLE>
#### Mary Louise MAYTAG, Appellant, v. ALFRED D. REID ASSOCIATES, etc., Appellee.

No. 77-2264.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 25, 1978.

Earl Faircloth, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Roger A. Bridges, Coral Gables, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *McNayr v. Cranbrook Investments, Inc.,*158 So.2d 129, 131 (Fla.1963); *Turner v. Long,*225 So.2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); *Clutter Construction Co. v. Naples Builders Supply Co.,*166 So.2d 813 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); *Lee County Oil Co. v. Marshall,*98 So.2d 510, 512 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957).
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Clyde Y. GIDDENS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53572.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1973.

In re: Clyde Y. Giddens applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles T. Bernhardt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 6, 2011





/s/Charles T. BernhardtCharles T. Bernhardt, CPAChief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 9 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Barrick Gold Corporation (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report). I, Jamie C. Sokalsky, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  a)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date:   March 30, 2005 /s/   Jamie C. Sokalsky
Name: Jamie C. Sokalsky
Title:   Executive Vice President and
            Chief Financial Officer
RECEIVABLES PURCHASE AGREEMENT

   This Receivables Purchase Agreement is executed by and between 
Nordstrom, Inc., a Washington corporation ("Nordstrom") and Nordstrom 
Credit, Inc., a Colorado corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of 
Nordstrom ("Credit").

   WHEREAS Credit is the owner and holder of certain amounts owing, from 
time to time, by a person or persons, including any guarantor thereof, 
under certain VISA accounts (I) owned by Nordstrom National Credit Bank 
as of July 31, 1996, other than VISA accounts which are 30 days or more 
delinquent on a contractual basis as of July 31, 1996, or (ii) 
originated y Nordstrom National Credit Bank during the period from the 
close of business on July 31, 1996 to the close of business on August 
14, 1996, including in each case without limitation, amounts owing for 
the purchase of merchandise and services, periodic finance charges, cash 
advances and cash advance fees, access checks, annual cardholder fees, 
credit insurance premiums, late fees, overlimit fees, return check fees 
and all other fees and charges, and all monies due or to become due with 
respect to any of the foregoing and all proceeds (including "proceeds" 
as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code (the "UCC") of the State of 
Colorado) thereof, the aggregate amount of which as of July 31, 1996 was 
$208,462,983 (the "Receivables"); and 

   WHEREAS Nordstrom desire to purchase from Credit, and Credit desires 
to sell to Nordstrom, the Receivables;

   NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

   1.   Credit hereby sells, transfers, assigns and conveys to Nordstrom 
all of Credit's right, title and interest in and to the Receivables, and 
Nordstrom hereby purchases all of such right, title and interest in and 
to the Receivables for a purchase price of $208,462,983; and

   2.   Credit agrees to do and perform, from time to time, any and all 
acts and to execute any and all further instruments required or 
reasonably requested by Nordstrom more fully to effect the purposes of 
this Agreement, including, without limitation, a financing statement 
relating to the transfer of the Receivables pursuant to this Agreement 
under the provisions of the UCC of the State of Colorado and any other 
applicable state and any financing statements or continuation statements 
relating to the Receivables requested by Nordstrom for filing under the 
provisions of the UCC of the State of Colorado or any other applicable 
state.

   This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the 
State of Colorado, without reference to its conflict of law provisions, 
and the obligations, rights and remedies of the parties hereunder shall 
be determined in accordance with such laws.





DATED this 14th day of August, 1996.

NORDSTROM, INC.,
a Washington corporation



By /s/ John A. Goesling
   ------------------------------
   John A. Goesling, Executive
   Vice President

NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.
a Colorado corporation


By /s/ John A. Goesling
   ------------------------------
   John A. Goesling, Executive
   Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1171 Referred in House (RFH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1171

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2014

 Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
    the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow a veterinarian to 
  transport and dispense controlled substances in the usual course of 
        veterinary practice outside of the registered location.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSPORTING AND DISPENSING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IN THE 
              USUAL COURSE OF VETERINARY PRACTICE.

    Section 302(e) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 822(e)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(e)'' and inserting ``(e)(1)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a registrant who is a 
veterinarian shall not be required to have a separate registration in 
order to transport and dispense controlled substances in the usual 
course of veterinary practice at a site other than the registrant's 
registered principal place of business or professional practice, so 
long as the site of transporting and dispensing is located in a State 
where the veterinarian is licensed to practice veterinary medicine and 
is not a principal place of business or professional practice.''.

            Passed the Senate January 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997 for May Limited  Partnership  1984-2 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000757385
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         286
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  333
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               619
<PP&E>                                         10,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   652
<SALES>                                        1,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,311
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,098
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,098
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,098
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  85.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  85.71
        


</TABLE>
#### Heriberto MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. WINN-DIXIE STORES et al., Respondents.

No. 42772.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.