alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fire Chief, Sitka Fire Department

AI Stevens

Assistant Fire Chief, Sitka Fire Dept.

Dave Miller

Sincerely,

Please consider the impact of all the fire departments that benefit from the services that Harris

Aircraft provides as well as the emergency disaster response needs. Thank you.

Without the continued services of Harris Aircraft ..the Sitka Fire Department could not afford to

help the State of Alaska in providing the required mandatory training. The State of Alaska

would have to send in instructors and resources from the interior resulting in lost time to all

who attend the training.

As the Emergency Managers for the City and Borough of Sitka, these outlying communities also

fall under our responsibility for notification and assistance during major disasters. Harris

Aircraft plays a vital role in resources and personnel in the event a community requires

immediate aid.

This training is provided to the smaller fire departments of Petersburg, Kake, Gustavus, Hoonah

and the communities of Prince of Wales. Without the services of Harris Air, we could not help

these smaller communities due to the amount of time required to travel to these locations. For

example, Alaska Airlines to Petersburg is one days travel to and one days travel from. Utilizing'

Harris Air, it is a simple 20 minute flight. The short time flights are not a matter of convenience

as you may think but a matter of response. All of these communities have only one fire dept.

including Sitka. These fire depts. depend on each and everyone of their volunteer members to

be available for emergency calls as much as possible. Two days travel via Alaska Airlines is not

acceptable.

The members of the Sitka Fire Department are in full support of Harris Aircraft Service, Inc. in

obtaining an Air Carrier Certificate.

Subject: Support for Harris Aircraft Services

To: Whom it may concern

Department of Transportation

,.

~FIREDEPARTMENT

209 LAKE ST. . SITKA, ALASKA . 99835

907 ..747-32\~gust so", 2014

City and Borough of Sitka
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 752 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 752

 Congratulating Marcel Closset, a French citizen and former member of 
 the French Resistance who was instrumental in saving a United States 
  Army Air Corps pilot during World War II, for receiving the French 
                            Legion of Honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2014

Mr. O'Rourke submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating Marcel Closset, a French citizen and former member of 
 the French Resistance who was instrumental in saving a United States 
  Army Air Corps pilot during World War II, for receiving the French 
                            Legion of Honor.

Whereas, on September 27, 2014, Marcel Closset, a French citizen and former 
        member of the French Resistance, received the French Legion of Honor in 
        the rank of Knight;
Whereas the French Legion of Honor was created by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1802 to 
        recognize the accomplishments of military personnel and civilians for 
        their service to France;
Whereas the French Legion of Honor is the highest-ranking order and decoration 
        given in France;
Whereas, on July 17, 2014, the President of France nominated Marcel Closset for 
        the French Legion of Honor to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the 
        liberation of France during World War II;
Whereas Marcel Closset is the current president of L'Amicale des Anciens du 
        maquis de Mazinghien, an association that works to preserve the memory 
        of the members of the French Resistance who fought for the liberation of 
        Mazinghien, France, in 1944; and
Whereas Marcel Closset was one of four people who risked their lives to rescue 
        and hide Eliot Shapleigh, Sr., a United States Army Air Corps pilot from 
        El Paso, Texas, who was forced to parachute from his crippled P-51 
        Mustang into Nazi-occupied France in 1944: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Marcel 
Closset for receiving the French Legion of Honor.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.2**

Certification of Annual Report

 

 

I, Susan D. Berland, Chief Financial Officerof NeoRx Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.               the Annual Report on Form10-K for the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (12 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  March 28, 2005 | By:    | /s/ SUSAN D. BERLAND |
|----------------------------|--------|----------------------|
|                       |   | Susan D. Berland     |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,222
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,334
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,078
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            49,078
<LOANS>                                         75,962
<ALLOWANCE>                                        307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,626
<DEPOSITS>                                      85,368
<SHORT-TERM>                                    14,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,103
<LONG-TERM>                                     22,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  11,855
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,466
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,515
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   180
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,161
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,825
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,273
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,888
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        1
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   7
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,444
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,444
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       956
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.20
<LOANS-NON>                                        218
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    605
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   311
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        5
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  307
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               281
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             26


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.6 


 


Consent of
Independent Registered Accounting Firm


 


We hereby consent to the use in
this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 20-F (the “Registration Statement”) of New Found Gold
Corp. (the “Company”) of our report dated December 23, 2020 relating to the financial statements of the Company
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading
“Statements by Experts” in this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement.


 


/s/ Crowe MacKay LLP


Chartered Professional Accountants


Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

March 17, 2021
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

BILLY CEPERO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10124

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00178-PMP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2014** 

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Billy Cepero appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying as moot

his motion to compel his former counsel to return his case file. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

The district court denied Cepero’s motion because it found that former

FILED

APR 11 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
counsel had already returned the entire case file to Cepero. We review this factual

finding for clear error, see United States v. Yi, 704 F.3d 800, 805 (9th Cir. 2013),

and the court’s denial of Cepero’s motion for abuse of discretion. See United

States v. Anthony, 93 F.3d 614, 616 (9th Cir. 1996). Because the record supports

the district court’s finding, it did not abuse its discretion in denying Cepero’s

motion. 

To the extent Cepero challenges the district court’s order denying his motion

for appointment of appellate counsel and the underlying January 30, 2012,

judgment, we decline to consider these arguments because they are outside the

scope of this appeal. 

AFFIRMED. 

2 13-10124
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**OfficerCertification under 18 USC 1350**

 

We, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of AXS-One Inc. (the “issuer”),do hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
|                              | AXS-ONE INC. |
|-----------------------------------|--------------|
|                              |         |   |
|                              |         |   |
| **Date:  **May 13, 2005 | By:          | /s/ William P. Lyons |   |
|                              |         | William P. Lyons  Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                              |         |   |
|                              |         |   |
|                              | By:          | /s/ Joseph Dwyer |   |
|                              |         |   | Joseph Dwyer  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,  and Treasurer |
|                                   |              |  |  |  |  |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Smart-tek

Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Perry Law, Chief Executive

Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section

13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Perry Law

---------------------------

Perry Law

Chief Executive Officer

May 18, 2007
# C_2022095EN.01000601.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 20 August 2021 — Finanzamt X v Y

(Case C-516/21)

(2022/C 95/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant: Finanzamt X

Applicant: Y

Question referred

Does the tax liability for the leasing of permanently installed equipment and machinery pursuant to Article 135(2), first subparagraph, point (c) of Directive 2006/112/EC (1) (‘the VAT Directive’) cover

| — | only the isolated (independent) leasing of such equipment and machinery or also |
| --- | --- |

—

only the isolated (independent) leasing of such equipment and machinery or also

| — | the leasing (letting) of such equipment and machinery which is exempt by virtue of (and as a supply ancillary to) a letting of a building, effected between the same parties, pursuant to Article 135(1)(l) of the VAT Directive? |
| --- | --- |

—

the leasing (letting) of such equipment and machinery which is exempt by virtue of (and as a supply ancillary to) a letting of a building, effected between the same parties, pursuant to Article 135(1)(l) of the VAT Directive?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-37913, 33-41664, 33-41665, 33-41783, 33-65754, 33-71008, 33-
71010, 33-86368, 33-86370, 33-86372, 333-03427, 333-03429, 333-65497, 333-65499,
333-65501, 333-72395, 333-96501 and 333-62826) pertaining to the Micrografx,
Inc. Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended, the Micrografx,
Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, the Micrografx, Inc. Restricted
Stock Purchase Plan and the Micrografx, Inc. Directors Stock Purchase Plan, as
amended, of our report dated August 9, 2001, except for the first paragraph of
Note 2 and the first paragraph of Note 10 as to which the date is August 28,
2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Micrografx, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
June 30, 2001.



Dallas, Texas
September 25, 2001


                                      59
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Preferred Voice, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary G. Merritt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/  Mary G. MerrittMary G. Merritt Principal Financial Officer November 13, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Mosby, Appellant.

[654 NYS2d 926]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The argument of defendant that County Court erred in admitting evidence that he possessed $1,026 at the time of his arrest is not preserved for our review as a matter of law *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). Were we to review the argument, we would conclude that it is without merit. Because defendant was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell, evidence of money found on defendant’s person at the time of arrest is probative of defendant’s intent *(see, People v Strunkey,*221 AD2d 387, *lv denied*87 NY2d 925; *People v Sanchez,*197 AD2d 359, 360, *lv denied*82 NY2d 902; *People v Gadsden,*192 AD2d 1103, *lv denied*82 NY2d 718), and it was permissible for the prosecutor to comment upon the evidence on summation *(see, People v Sanchez, supra).*(Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Bristol, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 33934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15433]



[[Page 33934]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting July 24, 2018, Telephonic, 12:00 
p.m., 10th Floor Board Meeting Room, 77 K Street NE, Washington, DC 
20002

Agenda

Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board Member Meeting Status: All 
parts will be open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: 

Open Session

1. Approval of the Minutes for the June 25, 2018 Board Member Meeting
2. Monthly Reports
    (a) Participant Activity
    (b) Legislative Report
3. Quarterly Reports
    (c) Investment Performance
    (d) Budget Review
    (e) Audit Status
4. Enterprise Risk Management Update
5. IT Update

Contact Person For More Information: Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office 
of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: July 16, 2018.
Dharmesh Vashee,
Deputy General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-15433 Filed 7-16-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1265 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1265

 To amend the Export Administration Act of 1979 to extend indefinitely 
  the current provisions governing the export of certain domestically 
                          produced crude oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 20 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Mrs. Murray (for herself and Mr. Hatfield) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Export Administration Act of 1979 to extend indefinitely 
  the current provisions governing the export of certain domestically 
                          produced crude oil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RESTRICTIONS ON OIL EXPORTS.

    Section 7(d) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 
App. 2406(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 20 or any other 
provision of law, this subsection shall remain in effect until 
expressly repealed. During any period during which this subsection is 
in effect (without regard to the application of the termination 
provision in section 20)--
            ``(A) all authorities under this Act may be exercised to 
        the extent necessary to assure compliance with this subsection; 
        and
            ``(B) the provisions of section 11 shall apply to 
        violations under this subsection.''.

SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

    Section 20 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 
2419) is amended by striking ``The'' and inserting ``Except as provided 
in section 7(d)(4), the''.

                                 <all>
```
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

376 

CAF 10-00488 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF LEOPOLIAN P., III, 

AND STEPHEN M., JR. 

----------------------------------------------- 

JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

TIFFANY B., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

AND LEOPOLIAN P., II, RESPONDENT. 

THOMAS N. MARTIN, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

CARACCIOLI & NELSON, PLLC, WATERTOWN (ANNALISE M. DYKAS OF COUNSEL),

FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

KIMBERLY A. WOOD, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, WATERTOWN, FOR LEOPOLIAN

P., III AND STEPHEN M., JR.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County

(Richard V. Hunt, J.), entered January 29, 2010 in a proceeding

pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other

things, terminated the parental rights of respondent mother. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Family Court.

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court