alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11

                Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED          
                                                                              DECEMBER 31,            NINE MONTHS ENDED 
                                                                     ----------------------------        DECEMBER 31,   
                                                                         1996             1995               1996
                                                                         ----             ----               ----


<S>                                                                  <C>               <C>               <C>       
Net income (in thousands)                                            $      258        $      224        $      586
                                                                     ==========        ==========        ==========

Weighted average shares outstanding  (1)                              1,427,001         1,491,600         1,441,341
Common stock equivalents due to the dilutive effect of
    stock options under the treasury stock method                        16,603                --             9,977
                                                                     ----------        ----------        ----------
  Weighted average shares outstanding and
    common stock equivalents                                          1,443,604         1,491,600         1,451,318

Primary earnings per share                                           $     0.18        $     0.15        $     0.40
                                                                     ==========        ==========        ==========

Weighted average shares outstanding and
   common stock equivalents (above)                                   1,443,604         1,491,600         1,451,318
Additional dilutive common stock equivalents using period end
   market value versus average market value for the period                1,232                --             7,858
                                                                     ----------        ----------        ----------

Fully diluted weighted average shares and
  common stock equivalents                                            1,444,836         1,491,600         1,459,176

Fully diluted earnings per share                                     $     0.18        $     0.15        $     0.40
                                                                     ==========        ==========        ==========

</TABLE>

(1)  Includes only the portion of ESOP shares committed to be released to 
     participants.
**EXHIBIT 31.1(A)****Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**     I, Dr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe registration, and we have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based onsuch evaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 16, 2006.   /s/ Dr. Lionel L. Reilly   Dr. Lionel L. Reilly, President and       Chief Executive Officer
#### Pearl VERHEYEN and Frank Verheyen, Appellants, v. OSIAS-JACK TAR HOTELS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-606.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 12, 1972.

Richard J. Taylor, of Strode, Hereford & Wolff, Sarasota, for appellants.

Joseph W. Gaynor, of Ulmer, Woodworth & Jacobs, P. A., St. Petersburg, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, appeal a final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee, defendant below.

*241We are of the view that the pleadings and depositions contained in the record on appeal present jury questions as to the issues raised by the amended complaint, the answer thereto and the affirmative defenses. There being issues of material fact at this juncture of the cause, it was error to enter a final summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 12

                     GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                           Six months ended June 30, 2001

                                   (Unaudited)



(In millions)

Earnings:
   Earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect                $287
      of change in accounting principle
   Fixed charges:
     Minority interest in net earnings of
       consolidated subsidiaries (1)                                   45
     Interest expense (2)                                              69
                                                                     ----
                                                                     $401
                                                                     ====
Fixed charges:
   Minority interest in net earnings of
     consolidated subsidiaries (3)                                   $ 61
   Interest expense (2)                                                69
                                                                     ----
                                                                     $130
                                                                     ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                   3.08
                                                                     ====


(1)  Minority  interest  in net earnings of  consolidated  subsidiaries includes
     earnings from purchased affiliates and dividends on subsidiary's  preferred
     stock.

(2)  Interest  expense   includes  an   amount  for  one-third  of  the   rental
     expense,  which the Company  believes is a reasonable  approximation of the
     interest factor for such rentals.

(3)  The  fixed  charges  amount  for  minority  interest  in  net  earnings  of
     consolidated  subsidiaries  represents  the pre-tax  earnings  amount which
     would be required to cover such fixed charges as calculated below:

                      Earnings From Purchased Affiliates or
                Subsidiary's Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
                -------------------------------------------------
                             100% - Income Tax Rate

     The  income  tax rate is based on the  relationship  of the  provision  for
     income taxes to earnings before income taxes for the respective period.


                                       8
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23(b)

                 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


     Arthur Andersen LLP audited the balance sheets of Material Sciences
Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, "MSC") as of February 28, 2002
and 2001, and the related statements of income (loss), cash flows, shareowners'
equity and comprehensive income (loss) for each of the three years in the period
ended February 28, 2002. These financial statements are included in MSC's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2003 and incorporated by
reference into MSC's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 33-00067, 33-40610, 33-31310, 33-57648, 33-81064, 333-15679, 333-15677,
333-33885, 333-33897 and 333-88387). After reasonable efforts, MSC has not been
able to obtain the consent of Arthur Andersen LLP to the incorporation by
reference of its audit report dated April 29, 2002 into the above-referenced
Registration Statements. The absence of an updated consent may limit recovery by
investors from Arthur Andersen LLP, particularly under Section 11(a) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Exhibit 21.  Subsidiaries of the Registrant

     Interchange  Bank (formerly  known as Interchange  State Bank),  and Clover
Leaf Mortgage Company,  Inc., both of which are incorporated in New Jersey,  are
wholly owned direct subsidiaries of the Registrant.

     Clover Leaf Investment Corporation, Clover Leaf Insurance Agency Inc.(d/b/a
Interchange  Insurance  Agency) and  Interchange  Capital  Company,  L.L.C.  are
incorporated  in  New  Jersey  and  are  wholly  owned  direct  subsidiaries  of
Interchange  Bank.  Clover Leaf  Management  Realty  Corporation,  which is also
incorporated in New Jersey, is 99% owned by Interchange Bank.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Evergreen Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael El-Hillow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|November 5, 2010       
|                       
|/s/ Michael El-Hillow  
|Michael El-Hillow      
|Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Susanne M. Galbraith 

611 Orr Street 

Miles City, Mt 59301 ' '-- ' --· f «-:, 

April10, 2013 

Docket Operations M-30 

West Building Ground Floor W 12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590; 3 

Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

This letter is written in support of continuing the Essential Air Service (EAS) to the 

communities of Miles City and Lewistown. 

We are the fourth largest state in the Union. If you took the following states; Road Island, 

Delaware, Connecticut, Hawaii, New Jersey, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, 

South Carolina, West Virginia and Maryland and placed them in our state, you would still 

have enough area to insert Delaware eleven more times. As you see, we travel great 

distances to seek out essential services. 

While we have adequate medical facilities in our area, if it is necessary to seek out 

specialists,_the nearest city would be Billings, MT or Denver, CO. The distance to each is 144 

and 515, respectively. Additionally, Miles City is a medical hub for the surrounding 

communities and residents of other areas travel large distances to Miles City, to see a 

medical provider. For example, if it becomes necessary for a resident of Alzada, MT to 

seek a specialist he/she would need to travel280 miles. 

In addition, our area is now in the mist of an oil boom and the cities in Southeastern 

Montana are all economically interconnected. We have many people working in the oil 

fields that live in "man camps" and whose families live in other cities and towns. Moreover, 

business representatives travel to these towns from other states. If one of the cities loses 

the ability to connect with another city, I foresee the other seven cities eventually losing 

their EAS. Because of the vastness of Montana, it is vital that we keep EAS in all our cities. 

Montana is second only to Guam in military recruitment. Our soldiers eventually come 

home and need medical assistance. The main veterans' hospital is Fort Harrison, MT. Our 

Miles City soldiers and veterans must travel roughly 6 hours, via automobile to Fort 

Harrison, to receive medical treatment. It is vital for our veterans to keep our EAS. 

i ~.J 
With a little "tweaking" in the flight schedule and some additional marketing, I believe that 

we can increase our EAS ridership. We, as a community, are committed to doing whatever 

it takes to keep this vital service. 

I would ask that you allow us to keep our EAS and give us the needed time to make this a 

viable service to our communities. 

Thank you. 

Best Regards, 

Susanne Galbraith 

City of Miles City, Ward 1 Council person
BY-LAWS OF
                                
                         MICROTECH MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
                                
                        AMENDMENT 3 - SECTION 13 AMENDED
                                
                                
                                
     Pursuant to Corporate  Resolution  passed August 15, 1996,  the By- Laws of
Microtech Medical Systems, Inc., are hereby amended as follows:

     Section 13. Number,  Tenure and Qualifications.  The number of directors of
the  corporation  shall be five.  Each director shall hold office until the next
annual or special  meeting of  shareholders at which a new Board of Directors is
elected and until his successor shall have been elected and qualified. Directors
need not be residents of Colorado or shareholders of the corporation.
     
Dated this 15th day of August, 1996.



                         ________________________________________
                         J. ROYCE RENFROW, Corporate Secretary
                          


<PAGE>

                                   BY-LAWS OF
                        MICROTECH MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
                                
                        AMENDMENT 2 - SECTION 23 AMENDED
                                
                                
                                
     Pursuant to  Corporate  Resolution  passed June 27,  1996,  the By- Laws of
Microtech Medical Systems, Inc., are hereby amended as follows:

     Section 23. Informal  Action by Directors.  Any action required to be taken
at a meeting of the Board of  Directors,  or any other action which may be taken
at a meeting  of the Board of  Directors,  may be taken  without a meeting  if a
consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by all of
the  directors  with  respect to the subject  matter  thereof.  Directors or any
committee  designated by the directors may participate in a meeting of the Board
of  Directors  or  committee  by  means  of  conference   telephone  or  similar
communications  equipment by which all persons  participating  in the meting can
hear each other at the same time. Such participation  shall constitute  presence
in person at the meeting.  Any written consent may be signed by the directors on
separate  counterparts and the facsimile  transmission of a director's signature
shall be deemed the equivalent of the original signature thus transmitted.
     
Dated this ________ day of __________________, 1996.



                         ________________________________________
                         J. ROYCE RENFROW, Corporate Secretary
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Bray and Annunziata 

RICHARD G. BROSCHINSKI 

v. Record No. 0651-95-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

ALCOA BUILDING PRODUCTS SEPTEMBER 19, 1995 

AND 

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (A. Thomas Lane, Jr., on brief), for appellant. 

 (J. David Griffin; Fowler, Griffin, Coyne & Coyne, on 

brief), for appellees. 

 The sole issue raised on appeal by Richard G. Broschinski 

(claimant) is that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in 

refusing to consider the June 9, 1994 letter of Richard D. 

Kolodner, a licensed professional counselor, on the ground that 

the letter does not qualify as a "medical report" under the 

Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act"). Upon reviewing the record 

and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's 

decision. Rule 5A:27. 

 In holding that Kolodner's opinion was not persuasive on the 

issue of disability, the commission found as follows: 

 The claimant principally relies on a letter 

of June 9, 1994, from . . . Kolodner, 

licensed professional counselor. However, 

this cannot be considered as a medical 

report. Neff v. Houff Transfer, Inc., VWC 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

File No. 165-33-84 (January 31, 1995). 

Kolodner is not a physician, and it does not 

appear that he has any type of professional 

graduate degree. Neither do we find any 

evidence that his opinion has been 

incorporated by any treating physician. 

 The commission's construction of the Act is entitled to 

great weight on appeal. City of Waynesboro v. Harter, 1 Va. App. 

265, 269, 337 S.E.2d 901, 903 (1985). 

 The term "medical report" is not defined in Code § 65.2-603 

to include reports of licensed professional counselors. If the 

general assembly intended that the reports of licensed 

professional counselors be considered as medical reports it could 

have specifically provided for such. It did so for 

chiropractor's treatment reports. See Code § 65.2-603(D). 

"While the . . . Act is to be liberally construed for the 

employee's benefit, that policy does not authorize the amendment, 

alteration or extension of its provisions beyond its obvious 

meaning." Gajan v. Bradlick Co., Inc., 4 Va. App. 213, 217, 355 

S.E.2d 899, 902 (1987). 

 Based upon the commission's interpretation of Code 

§ 65.2-603, we cannot find as a matter of law that the commission 

erred in refusing to consider the letter of Kolodner, a licensed 

professional counselor, as a "medical report" under Code 

§ 65.2-603. 

 For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 07-1931 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v . RODRIGO CAMPUSANO, Defendant, Appellant.

____________________ No. 07-2442 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v . JAIME PINILLOS, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA The opinion of this Court, issued on February 13, 2009, should be amended as follows. On page 5, lines 18-21 change sentence: "Based on . . . one hundred kilos;" to read as follows: "Based on the combined testimony of Rafa, Toro and Pinillos, the district judge could reasonably find that the intended transaction was for one hundred kilos;". On page 6, line 3, following "delivery" add sentence: "Indeed, Pinillos himself conceded on the stand that he was hoping to consummate a transaction for one hundred 'computers.'" On page 8, line 23, add the word " i n itial" following the word "smaller".
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- )ot'l;-t:?I3D Directorate Identifier: 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Hartzell Propeller Dick Edinger Several Concur. 

AOPA Rob Hackman 

Other/ Additional Information: 

Name TCDS Model Number Part Number 

Hartzell Propeller Inc P-845 HC-12X HC-12X20-7 _.,-

Hartzell Propeller Inc P46GL HC-12V HC-12V20-7 ../ 

Hartzell Propeller Inc P-845 HC-12X HC-12X20-8 / 

Hatizell Propeller Inc P46GL HC-12V HC-12V20-8 / 

TRW Hartzell Propeller P-917 HC-D2X HC-D2X20-7 _, 

Hartzell Propeller Inc P48GL HC-D2V HC-D2V20-7 / 

Hartzell Propeller Inc P48GL HC-D2MV HC-D2MV20-7 / 

TRW Hartzell Propeller P-917 HC-D2X HC-D2X20-8 / 

Hartzell Propeller Inc P48GL HC-D2V HC-D2V20-8 v 

Hartzell Propeller Inc P48GL HC-D2MV HC-D2MV20-8 -' 

Hartzell Propeller Inc P-888 HC-13X HC-13X20-8 ./ 

Hartzell Propeller Inc P51GL HC-D3V HC-D3V20-8 ./ 

Hartzell Propeller Inc P51GL HC-D3MV HC-D3MV20-8/ 

9