alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 423

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 12, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2473) to designate certain National Forest

lands in the State of Montana as wilderness, to release other

National Forest lands in the State of Montana for multiple

use management, and for other purposes. The first reading

of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against

consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause

2(l)(6) of rule XI are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed ninety minutes, with

sixty minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural

Resources, fifteen minutes equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Agriculture, and fifteen minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the
2

HRES 423 EH

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. After general

debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute

rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now

printed in the bill. Each section of the committee amendment

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read.

Points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute for failure to comply with clause 5(a) of

rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph J. Ueberroth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/    JOSEPH J.
UEBERROTH
|Joseph J. Ueberroth       
|Chief Executive Officer   
|                          
|May 5, 2005               



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
SUSANAMARTINEZGovernorJOHNA.SANCHEZLieutenantGovemorNEWMEXICOENVIRONMENTDEPARTMENTSurfaceWaterQualityBureauHaroldRunnelsBuilding,N20501190SouthSt.FrancisDrive(87505)P.O.Box5469,SantaFe,NM87502-5469Phone(505)827-0187Fax(505)827-0160www.nmenv.state.nm.usOriginalviaUPS--CopyviaElectronicMailJune8,2012Mr.WilliamK.HonkerActingDirectorWaterQualityProtectionDivision(6WQ)U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1445RossAvenue,Suite1200Dallas,Texas75202-2733Re:StateCertificationDearMr.Honker:DAVEMARTINSecretaryBUTCHTONGATEDeputySecretaryJMIESH.DAVIS,Ph.D.DirectorResourceProtectionDivisionEnclosed,pleasefindthestatecertificationforthefollowingproposedNPDESpennit:VesselGeneralPermit(VGP)SmallVesselGeneralPermit(vVGP)Ifany,commentsandconditionsareenclosedonseparatesheets.cc:(w/enclosures)Ms. DianeSmith,USEPA(6WQ-NP)(viae-mail)PaulJuarez,USEPA(6WQ)(viae-mail)Mr.SamuelColman,ActingAdministratorEnvironmentalProtectionAgency1445RossAvenueDallas,TX75202-2733STATECERTIFICATIONRE:VesselGeneralPermit(VGP)SmallVesselGeneralPermit(vVGP)DearMr.Colman:6/8/2012TheNewMexicoEnvironmentDepartmenthasexaminedtheproposedNPDESpermitabove.ThefollowingconditionsarenecessarytoassurecompliancewiththeapplicableprovisionsoftheCleanWaterActSections208(e),301,302,303,306,and307andwithappropriaterequirementsofStatelaw.Compliancewiththetermsandconditionsofthepermitandthiscertificationwillprovidereasonableassurancethatthepennittedactivitieswillbeconductedinamannerwhichwillnotviolateapplicablewaterqualitystandardsandthewaterqualitymanagementplanandwillbeincompliancewiththeantidegradationpolicy.TheStateofNewMexico(X)certifiesthatthedischargewillcomplywiththeapplicableprovisionsofSections208(e),301,302,303,306and307oftheCleanWaterActandwithappropriaterequirementsofStatelaw()certifiesthatthedischargewillcomplywiththeapplicableprovisionsofSections208(e),301,302,303,306and307oftheCleanWaterActandwithappropriaterequirementsofStatelawuponinclusionofthefollowingconditionsinthepermit(seeattachments)()deniescertificationforthereasonsstatedintheattachment()waivesitsrighttocertifyInordertomeettherequirementsofStatelaw,includingwaterqualitystandardsandappropriatebasinplanasmaybeamendedbythewaterqualitymanagementplan,eachoftheconditionscitedinthedraftpennitandtheStatecertificationshallnotbemadeless stringent.TheDepartmentreservestherighttoamendorrevokethiscertificationifsuchactionisnecessarytoensurecompliancewiththeState'swaterqualitystandardsandwaterqualitymanagementplan.PleasecontactRichardPowellat(505)827-2798,ifyouhaveanyquestionsconcerningthiscertification.Commentsandconditionspertainingtothisdraftpermitareattached.Vessel General

Permit

(VGP) Small

Vessel General

Perm

it (vVGP

) State Certification

of the Proposed

NPDES

Permit June

8, 2012 Conditions

of Certification There

are

no comments

at this time. Comments

That

Are

Not Conditions

Of Cert

i fication Th ere

are

no comments

at this time.
Exhibit 99.2

                    GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  GE  Global  Insurance  Holding
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Marc A. Meiches, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
         material respects, the financial condition and  result of operations of
         the Company.



  /s/ Marc A. Meiches
--------------------------
Marc A. Meiches
Chief Executive Officer
July 31, 2002


                                       15
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00463-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.L., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 325th District Court

of Tarrant County (325-702420-21)

March 30, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                       387
<INVENTORY>                                      2,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,810
<PP&E>                                           6,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,216
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           762
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,824
<SALES>                                         12,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,096
<CGS>                                            3,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,508
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,567
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,567
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
                                                --------------------------------------------
                                                   NUMBER         PERCENT        EQUIVALENT
                                                  OF SHARES     OUTSTANDING        SHARES
                                                ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>             <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                            2,300,000          100.00%      2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                         2,488,572           99.43%      2,474,476
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock      15,310,943          100.00%     15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                    11,242,857          100.00%     11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                     4,323,874          100.00%      4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                      6,000,000          100.00%      6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                    (6,588)         100.00%         (6,588)
   March 2000 Debt Swap                            3,789,715          100.00%      3,789,715
   Canadian Transaction                              714,286          100.00%        714,286
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued        169,504           93.06%        157,734
   Warrants Exercised                                134,737           98.90%        133,256
                                                ------------                    ------------
                                                  46,467,900                      46,440,553

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                               46,440,553

NET LOSS                                                                         (30,960,949)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                              $      (0.68)
                                                                                ============
</TABLE>
#### Louis B. HARPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-195.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 8, 1970.

Frank A. Taylor, Orlando, Attorney Acting as amicus curiae, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order entered after a complete hearing denying appellant’s motions for new trial, to vacate his plea of guilty and to vacate judgment and sentence. These motions were made on the grounds that appellant was coerced and/or misled in changing his plea from not guilty to guilty at his retrial.

We have carefully and fully reviewed the record on appeal, briefs and oral argument of the parties. Upon our consideration thereof, we are of the opinion that the court did not mislead the appellant in any manner and that appellant’s guilty plea was freely and voluntarily entered. A defendant cannot be given the option of rejecting his uncoerced plea of guilty if his sentence fails to conform with his expectations. Manning v. State, 203 So.2d 360, 361 (Fla.App.2nd, 1967).

Accordingly, the order denying appellant’s motions must be and is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
ACQUIPORT PARK CENTRAL, INC.
                  C/O J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.
                          522 FIFTH AVENUE, 9TH FLOOR
                           NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10036

                               February 6, 1997

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Park Central Limited Partnership
c/o The Balcor Company
Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza
2355 Waukegan Road - Suite A-200
Bannockburn, Illinois  60015

Attention:  Ms. Ilona Adams

     Re:  Park Central Office Building
          Atlanta, Georgia

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is hereby made to that certain Agreement of Sale, dated as of January
20, 1997, between the undersigned, as Purchaser, and yourself, as Seller,
covering the captioned property (the "Contract").  All capitalized terms used
herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
the Contract.

In accordance with the Paragraph 8 of the Contract, the undersigned hereby
notifies you of its intention to extend the Closing Date to a date no later
than February 28, 1997.  Our attorneys will be in touch with you by telephone
to confirm the new Closing Date, which we anticipate will be either February 19
or 20.

Very truly yours,

ACQUIPORT PARK CENTRAL, INC.

By:  /s/ Wayne A. Comer
     -----------------------------
     Wayne A. Comer, V.P.

cc:  The Balcor Company
     Attention:  Mr. James Mendelson
     FAX:  (847) 317-4462

     Katten Muchin & Zavis
     Attention:  Daniel J. Perlman, Esq.
     FAX:  (312) 902-1061
<PAGE>
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT32

Officer Certification under 18 USC 1350

We,the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofAXS-One Inc. (the ‘‘issuer’’), do herebycertify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

|                      |  |  |                                                                            |
|----------------------|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |  |  | AXS-ONE INC.                                                               |
| Date: August  9,2006 |  |  | /s/ William P. Lyons                                                       |
|                 |  |  | William P. LyonsChief Executive OfficerandChairman of the Board            |
|                 |  |  | /s/Joseph Dwyer                                                            |
|                 |  |  | Joseph DwyerExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial Officer,and Treasurer |
|                 |  |  |                                                                       |
|                      |

----
H. Res. 61

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

February 4, 1993.

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee

on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House is

hereby waived with respect to a resolution providing for consideration of a bill relating to family and temporary medical

leave for certain employees.

Attest:

Clerk.
Giving Blood
        -  Why donate? 
        -  What is the process? 
        -  What are the donation types? 
        -  Can I donate? 
        -  What if I have concerns? 
        -  Who benefits? 
        -  Where can I donate? 

# Find a Blood Donation Center

## Enter your zip code below to find a blood donation center near you. Then, make an appointment to save lives today.

Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB)  provides a location service for blood centers across the U.S.
#### Richard FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-753.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Fund VII
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,404,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               392,844
<PP&E>                                      28,501,029<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,862,735<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,592,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          815,041
<BONDS>                                     12,744,191<F3>
<COMMON>                                     4,033,154<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,592,386
<SALES>                                      4,537,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,537,418
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,442,803<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,119,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,601)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,601)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,601)<F6>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes apartment complexes of $18,551,890, retail center of $9,661,845 and
deferred expenses of $287,294.
<F2>Includes depreciation of $12,807,221 and amortization of deferred expenses of
$55,514.
<F3>Represents mortgage notes payable.
<F4>Represents total equity of general and limited partners of ($236,264) and
$4,269,418, respectively.
<F5>Includes operating expenses of $1,723,450, real estate tax expense $437,955 and
depreciation and amortization $1,281,398.
<F6>Net loss allocated (246) to the General Partners and (24,355) to Limited
Partners for the year ended 12/31/95.  Average net income per unit of Limited
Partner interest is (.90) on 27,184 units outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES BERRY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 291 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES BERRY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 292 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18 th day of April , 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the

remaining issue. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did it not violate due process and the Sentencing Code for the trial court to

consider Petitioner's bare arrest record as a factor in imposing a more

severe sentence, and did not the Superior Court err in reviewing this under

an abuse[ ]of[ ]discretion sta ndard?
#### COSMOPOLITAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF WEST MIAMI, Florida, formerly known as Town of West Miami, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-401.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 27, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 25, 1970.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Da-vant, Miami, for appellant.

Allen Clements, Jr., Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ., and MARTIN, HENRY F., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Zack Co., Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 447.
Exhibit 23

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
NeoRx Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-65862, 333-35442, 333-45398 and 333-111344) on Forms
S-3 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-89476, 333-71368, 33-43860, 33-46317, 33-87108, 333-32583 and
333-41764) on Forms S-8 of NeoRx Corporation of our report dated March 2, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of NeoRx Corporation as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of NeoRx Corporation.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Seattle,
Washington
March 9, 2004

---

QuickLinks