alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LUM’S, INC., a Florida corporation, a/k/a Lum’s, Appellant, v. Joseph D. FARISH, Jr., Appellee.

No. 70-1143.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 4, 1972.

Smith, Mandler, Smith & Parker, P. A., and Joe N. Unger, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Farish & Farish, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, J J.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on June 22, 1971 (251 So.2d 338) reversing the summary final judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, 267 So.2d 325, by its opinion and judgment filed September 27, 1972 and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause with instructions to reinstate and affirm the decision of the circuit court.

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on August 31, 1971 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed June 22, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the summary final judgment of the circuit court appealed from herein is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
AP-77,046

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/9/2015 12:42:57 PM

Accepted 4/9/2015 12:49:54 PM

INTHE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ABEL A£°|TM

AT AUSTIN

vs. § 4

HENRY W. SKINNER

No. AP-77,046 (V ^

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

This Court has advised the parties that "there is a question ... whether this

appeal arises from a properly filed Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 64

motion requesting DNA testing ...," suggesting they "be prepared to address this

issue at oral argument." Order, Skinner v. State, No. AP-77,046 (Tex. Crim. App.

March 18, 2015) (citation omitted).

In response, Mr. Skinner seeks leave to file the accompanying supplemental

memorandum of law. An opportunity to review written arguments, as well as to

hear from the parties during oral argument, will better ensure that the Court

accurately resolves the jurisdictional question it asked the parties to address.

WHEREFORE, Appellant HENRY W. SKINNER requests that the Court

grant him leave to file the accompanying Supplemental Memorandum ofLaw.

Respectfully submitted,
s/ Robert C. Owen

ROBERT C. OWEN

Texas Bar No. 15371950

Bluhm Legal Clinic

Northwestern University

School ofLaw

375 East Chicago Ave.

Chicago, IL 60611-3069

(312) 503-0135 voice

(312) 503-8977 facsimile

robert.owen@law.northwestern.edu

DOUGLAS G. ROBINSON

1440 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005-2111

(202) 371-7800 voice

(202) 393-5760 facsimile

Counsel for Appellant

Henry W. Skinner
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This certifies that on April 9, 2015, a true and correct electronic copy of the

foregoing document was served via the Court's electronic filing system upon counsel for

the State ofTexas:

Katherine D. Hayes (katherine.hayes@texasattorneygeneral.gov),

Edward L. Marshall (edward.marshall@texasattorneygeneral.gov),

Franklin McDonough (Franklin.McDonough@graycch.com).

s/ Robert C. Owen

Robert C. Owen

Texas Bar No. 15371950

Counsel for Appellant
#### Luther E. MASTERS and Alma W. Masters, his wife, et al., Appellees, v. Marvin WIEKER and Lucille Wieker, his wife, Appellants,

No. 71-1135.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         551,094
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,649
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       9,069,165
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,120,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,666,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,626,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,666,451
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,254,597
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,079,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                175,174
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            175,174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   175,174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 24

BARRISTER GLOBAL SERVICES NETWORK, INC.



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


Board of Directors and Stockholders
Barrister Global Services Network, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Barrister Global Services
Network, Inc. as of March 31, 2000, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2000 and
1999. In connection with our audits of the financial statements, we have also
audited the financial statement schedule listed in exhibit 27 of the annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. These
financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Barrister Global Services
Network, Inc. as of March 31, 2000, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also,
in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements for those years taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.





KPMG LLP
Buffalo, New York
June 26, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1206 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1206

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To redesignate the Federal building located at 380 Trapelo Road in 
 Waltham, Massachusetts, as the ``Frederick C. Murphy Federal Center''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1206

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To redesignate the Federal building located at 380 Trapelo Road in 
 Waltham, Massachusetts, as the ``Frederick C. Murphy Federal Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 380 Trapelo Road in Waltham, 
Massachusetts, and known as the Waltham Federal Center, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Frederick C. Murphy Federal Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frederick C. 
Murphy Federal Center''.

            Passed the Senate February 1 (legislative day, January 25), 
      1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000755872
<NAME>                        KFP 85-LTD.
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         210,373
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  459,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (41,199)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         5,456,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,070,772)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,882,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        4,456,922
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,882,029
<SALES>                                        1,047,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,936,768
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  955,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               540,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             513,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (73,452)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (73,452)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (73,452)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (9.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (9.07)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Ion Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") on Forms S-3
(File Nos. 333-09507, 333-85693, 333-50246 and 333-83686) and Forms S-8 (File
Nos. 333-61837, 333-14681, 333-76809, 333-76604 and 333-76568) of our report
dated June 28, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
appears in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March
31, 2002.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
July 1, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.2

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10- K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John F. McGrath, Jr., Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

June 13, 2006

/s/ JOHN F. MCGRATH, JR.John F. McGrath, Jr.
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

December 6, 2006



### ERRATA

Appeal No.06-5035

LEONARD E. CASSELLA V UNITED STATES

Decided: December 1, 2006 Precedential Opinion

Please make the following change:

Page 13, line 16, change “district cour t” to “Court of Federal Claims.”
#### REDWING CARRIERS, INC., Petitioner, v. William T. MAYO et al., Respondents (two cases).

No. 39754.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 19, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW and CARLTON, JJ., and HODGES, Circuit Judge, concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                        CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

                        --------------------------------

                             Pursuant to Section 242
                                     of the
                             General Corporation Law
                                     of the
                                State of Delaware

                        --------------------------------

     THE UNDERSIGNED, being the President/CEO of California Steel Industries,
Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify as follows:

     1.   That certain paragraph (2) of Article Second of the Certificate of
          Incorporation of the Company is amended to read as follows:

               "(2) The Board of Directors shall have power to recommend
               changes, additions or amendments to this Certificate or the
               Bylaws of the corporation, subject to the approval of the
               stockholders; to fix and vary the amount to be reserved for any
               proper purpose; to authorize and cause to be executed mortgages
               and liens upon all or any part of the property of the
               corporation; to determine the use and disposition of any surplus
               or net profits; and to fix the times for the declaration and
               payment of dividends.

     2.   That the amendments set forth in paragraph 1 above have been duly
          adopted in accordance with the provisions of section 242 of the
          General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and the seal of the Company this
27th day of July, 1999.


                             By: /s/ C.  Lourenco  Goncalves,  President and CEO


                             By: /s/ Brett Guge, Secretary

                                       1
# C_2022244EN.01003102.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Ilunga Luyoyo v Council

(Case T-108/21) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

(2022/C 244/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-C. Cadilhac and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 30) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2020 L 419, p. 5), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo in so far as those acts concern Mr Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo in so far as those acts concern Mr Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.

---
#### Ulysses JACKSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-769.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
From: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

Date: 05/02/2012 03:39 PM

Subject: RE:SETTLEMENT agreement

It's a settlement agreement

- sorry I used the wrong term. Do you have these public documents? Click on

the attachment, upper left corner.

(See attached file: ENV_DEFENSE

- #593481

- v1

- DN_1369132_Motion_Filed.PDF)

(See attached file: ENV_DEFENSE

- #593479

- v1

- DN_1369131_Motion_Filed.PDF)

Sharon V. Nizich

Mineral s and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS

- US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541

- 2825

From: "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@E PA

Date: 05/02/2012 03:34 PM

Subject: RE: consent agreement stipulated date

Hi Sharon,

Is a consent decree or settlement agreement? The information I have fromOP lists it as a settlement

agreement.

Thanks,

Cortney

From: Sharon Nizich [ mailto:Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 2:48 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Subject: consent agreement stipulated date

The consent agreement lists June 15 as the proposal date. Also, I need to mo ve our talk tomorrow so

OGC can attend. Sorry for the change.

Sharon V. Nizich

Minerals and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS

- US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541

- 2825
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission 47 CFR Part 73
[DA 18-699; MB Docket No. 18-43; RM-11797]
 AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: At the request of The Chickasaw Nation, the Audio Division amends the FM Table of Allotments by allotting FM Channel 247A at Connerville, Oklahoma, as a Tribal Allotment and a first local Tribal-owned service to the community. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 247A can be allotted at Connerville, Oklahoma, as proposed, consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's rules with a site restriction 9.40 km (5.84 miles) southwest of the community. The reference coordinates are 34-25-00 NL and 96-43-53 WL.
 DATES: Effective August 20, 2018.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Y. Denysyk, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2700.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
                    *Report and Order,*
                     MB Docket No. 18-43, adopted July 5, 2018, and released July 6, 2018. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The full text is also available online at 
                    *http://apps.fcc.gov/​ecfs/​.*
                     This document does not contain information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. The Commission will send a copy of the 
                    *Report and Order*
                     in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 
                    *see*5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Radio
Radio broadcasting
 Federal Communications Commission. Nazifa Sawez, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
 1.The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 309, 310, 334, 336, and 339. 2.In § 73.202(b), the table is amended under Oklahoma by adding Connerville, Channel 247A, in alphabetical order to read as follows: § 73.202
  
 (b) * * * Channel No.*    *    *    *    *Oklahoma*    *    *    *    *Connerville
247A*    *    *    *    *


[FR Doc. 2018-15309 Filed 7-17-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P