alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021462EN.01002601.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/26 |
| ---------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 30 August 2021 — SIA Mikrotīkls v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Case C-542/21) (2021/C 462/31) Language of the case: Latvian Referring court Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) Parties to the main proceedings Applicant at first instance and appellant: SIA Mikrotīkls Defendant at first instance and respondent: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests Question referred Must the combined nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, ( 1 ) as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 ( 2 ) of 9 October 2012 and Commission Implementing Regulation No 1001/2013 ( 3 ) of 4 October 2013, be interpreted as meaning that subheading 8517 70 11 of the combined nomenclature can include router aerials configured for use in local area networks (LAN) and/or wide area networks (WAN)? ( 1 )  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1. ( 2 )  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 of 9 October 2012 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2012 L 304, p. 1). ( 3 )  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2013 L 290, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 21

     SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES OF HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

               1.  Highwoods/Florida Holdings GP, L.P.
               2.  AP-GP Southeast Portfolio Partners, L.P.
               3.  Highwoods/Tennessee Holdings GP, L.P.
               4.  Highwoods/Tennessee Holdings, L.P.
               5.  AP Southeast Portfolio Partners, L.P.
               6.  Highwoods/Florida Holdings, L.P.
               7.  Forsyth Properties Services, Inc.
               8.  Highwoods Services, Inc.
               9.  Southeast Realty Options Corp.

<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JENNIFER L. MACAVOY, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 645 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 23rd day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT  23







                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Analytical Surveys, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-24142, No. 33-33948, No. 33-53950, No. 33-59940 and No. 333-47365) on Form
S-8 of Analytical Surveys, Inc. of our report dated December 29, 1999, except as
to the last paragraph of note 4 and notes 10 and 11, which are as of March 6,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Analytical Surveys, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1999, which report appears in
the September 30, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Analytical Surveys, Inc.



KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 6, 2000
# C_2021289EN.01002401.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 6 April 2021 — Italy Emergenza Cooperativa Sociale v Azienda Sanitaria Locale Barletta-Andria-Trani

(Case C-213/21)

(2021/C 289/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: Italy Emergenza Cooperativa Sociale

Defendant and respondent: Azienda Sanitaria Locale Barletta-Andria-Trani

Question referred

Does Article 10(h) of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) — together with recital 28 of that directive — preclude national legislation which provides that contracts for the provision of emergency ambulance transport services may be directly awarded, on a preferential basis, solely to voluntary organisations — provided that they have been registered for at least six months in the national third sector register, belong to a network of associations and are accredited under the relevant sectoral regional legislation (if any) and on the condition that such an award ensures that the service can be provided within a framework of effective contributions to social goals, which pursues objectives of solidarity, in an economically efficient and appropriate manner and in accordance with the principles of transparency and non-discrimination — to the exclusion of other non-profit organisations, and more specifically social cooperatives, such as non-profit-making social enterprises?

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

---
# C_2023024EN.01003601.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Bowden and Young v Europol

(Case T-72/21) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Europol staff - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Loss of nationality of a Member State - Termination of contract - Article 47(b)(iii) of the CEOS - Request for an exception from the condition of employment provided for in Article 12(2)(a) of the CEOS - Refusal to grant an exception - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Length of the administrative procedure - Reasonable time - Legitimate expectations - Equal treatment - Interest of the service - Duty of care - Manifest error of assessment)

(2023/C 24/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Ian James Bowden (The Hague, the Netherlands), Janey Young (The Hague) (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (represented by: A. Nunzi, O. Sajin and C. Falmagne, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

By their action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the decisions of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) of 30 March 2020, by which it refused to grant them an exception from the condition of nationality laid down in Article 12(2)(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘CEOS’) and consequently terminated their respective contracts on the basis of Article 47(b)(iii) of the CEOS.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Ian James Bowden and Mrs Janey Young to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Ian James Bowden and Mrs Janey Young to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.

---
# C_2022213EN.01004901.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/49

---

Order of the General Court of 28 March 2022 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Rimex Trading (UNK UNIK)

(Case T-144/21) (1)

(2022/C 213/68)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 163, 3.5.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet of Global Marine Inc. and subsidiaries
as of 9-30-98 and the related condensed consolidated statement of operations
for the nine months ended 9-30-98, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          52,000
<SECURITIES>                                     1,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  181,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               308,200
<PP&E>                                       1,810,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 374,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,901,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,100
<BONDS>                                        595,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     988,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,901,600
<SALES>                                          3,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               903,300
<CGS>                                            2,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  630,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                242,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            188,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   188,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1083 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1083

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that veterans' 
   allowances and benefits administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
               Affairs are not included in gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 8 (legislative day, June 7), 1993

Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. DeConcini, Mr. Graham, Mr. Akaka, Mr. 
Daschle, Mr. Campbell, and Mr. Jeffords) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that veterans' 
   allowances and benefits administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
               Affairs are not included in gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Tax Fairness Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF VETERANS' BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 134(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified military benefit) is 
amended by adding at the end thereof the following flush sentence:
        ``For purposes of this paragraph, the term `qualified military 
        benefit' includes any veterans' allowance or benefit 
        administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.''.
    (b) Limitation on Modifications.--Paragraph (3) of such section is 
amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking out ``subparagraph 
        (B)'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``subparagraphs (B) and 
        (C)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Exception for veterans benefits.--
                Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any veterans' 
                allowance or benefit administered by the Secretary of 
                Veterans Affairs.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1984.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           4,285
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                       937
<INVENTORY>                                     88,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         278,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        152,302
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,753
<SALES>                                        175,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,597
<CGS>                                          102,559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75
        

</TABLE>
#### Vivian SKINNER, etc., Appellant, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 76-1306 and 76-1307.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 18, 1977.

*1123Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Fred 0. Past-ernack, Miami, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and Mark Hicks, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated appeals are from an order granting summary final judgment for a defendant, Volkswagen of America, Inc., and the summary judgment entered pursuant to the first order. The judgment appealed is for the company which imported and then distributed a foreign built automobile to dealers in the United States. The negligence alleged was a failure to warn of a claimed design defect. It affirmatively appears from this record that there is no factual allegation or facts presented to support the knowledge of this defendant of the alleged design defect. Therefore, the judgment appealed must be affirmed upon authority of the holdings in *Carter v. Hector Supply Co.,*128 So.2d 390 (Fla.1961), and *Williams v. Joseph L. Rozier Machinery Co.,*135 So.2d 763 (Fla.2d DCA 1961).

Affirmed.
Exhibit 11 – Statement regarding computation of per share earnings

 
The following table reconciles  the income and average share amounts used to compute both basic and diluted earnings per  share:

2003
2002
2001
Net income (loss)
$    123,006
$    213,576
$    (10,296)
Basic earnings per share:
Weighted average    shares outstanding
    5,083,146
    5,083,146
    5,083,146Diluted earnings per    share:Weighted average    shares outstanding
5,083,146
5,083,146
5,083,146Shares    contingently exercisable from    stock options
530,000
535,000
*Weighted average    shares outstanding
5,613,146
5,618,146
5,083,146
* Certain stock options were excluded from the computation of earnings    per share due to their antidilutive effect. The number of such options is $515,000 for    2001.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than August 2, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta*                     (Kathryn Haney, Director of Applications) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Paula Swiber individually and as trustee for Wallace Carline and Gracie Carline, Mike Swiber, Glen David Carline, Carline Land Corporation, Carline Bouef Properties, all of Morgan City, Louisiana; Lisa Carline, of Miramar Beach, Florida; and Stephen Swiber, of Gibson, Louisiana;*                     to retain shares of M C Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain shares of M C Bank & Trust Company, both of Morgan City, Louisiana.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 13, 2018.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-15330 Filed 7-17-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
#### Ronald H. RUSSELL, Appellant, v. Joyce M. RUSSELL, Appellee.

No. 73-618.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 16, 1973.

Appeal quashed.
#### Frank CONROY v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH.

No. 38232.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 16, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 217 So.2d 164.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Erik E. Prusch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of Outerwall Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 28, 2016 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Erik E. Prusch     
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Erik E. Prusch         
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Frank Paul FRIEDMAN and Travelers Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Lester D. VAN SWAYCK, Appellee.

No. 70-501.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 2, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Smart-tek

Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31,2006 as filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Perry Law, Chief

Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section

13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Perry Law

------------------------------

Perry Law

Chief Financial Officer

February
13, 2007
#### Lewis Haywood MERCER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-219.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 14, 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 4, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 14, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23

- 2170 Lower Tribunal No s

. HSMV Case No. MS

- 23

- 071 , DOAH Case No. 23

- 1420

________________ Amigos Traffic School, Inc. ,

Appellant,

vs. Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles ,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

. Claudio R. Cedrez LLC , and Claudio R. Cedrez Pell e grino, for appellant. David Arthmann, General Counsel , and Linsey Sims

- Bohnenstiehl, Assistant Gen er al Counsel (Tallahassee) , for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR , JJ.
PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Bagarotti v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals
Comm’n , 208 So. 3d 1197, 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“An administrative hearing officer ’ s findings of fact may not be disturbed by a reviewing court if those findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence.”); see also O.H. v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities , 332 So. 3d 27, 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“It does not matter that there may be competent substantial evidence to support alternative findings of fact, only whether the hearing officer ’ s findings of fact are supported by competent and substantial evidence.”)

.
# C_2021242EN.01000202.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/2

---

Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Dermavita Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-643/19, Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA)

(Case C-26/21 P)

(2021/C 242/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Dermavita Co. Ltd (represented by: D. Todorov, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Allergan Holdings France SAS

By order of 4 May 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Dermavita Co. Ltd should bear its own costs.

---