alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 33-33013, No. 33-33063, No. 33-65157, No. 33-68860, No. 333-49837 and No.
333-44436 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 33-45815 on Form S-3 of
Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2002,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Network Equipment Technologies,
Inc. for the year ended March 29, 2002.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


San Jose, California

June 14, 2002


                                    Page 56
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

December 6, 2006 

ERRATA

Appeal No.06-5035 

LEONARD E. CASSELLA V UNITED STATES

Decided: December 1, 2006 Precedential Opinion 

Please make the following change: 

Page 13, line 16, change “district court” to “Court of Federal Claims.”
260 La. 702

#### INTERNATIONAL PIPE *&*CERAMICS CORPORATION v. CHARLES CARTER COMPANY, Inc., et al.

No. 52082.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 11, 1972.

In re: Charles Carter & Company, Inc., and The Employers’ Fire Insurance Company applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 255 So.2d 495.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 566

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives urging Israel and

the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to reach agreement on

holding free and democratic elections in Gaza and the West Bank.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 4, 1994

Ms. DANNER (for herself, Mr. RAHALL, and Mr. KILDEE) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives urging

Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)

to reach agreement on holding free and democratic elections in Gaza and the West Bank.

Whereas the United States has traditionally supported the

principle of free and democratic elections to settle political disputes;

Whereas elections are an essential step in establishing selfgovernment for the Palestinian people of the West Bank

and Gaza Strip and are thereby an indispensable element

for reaching a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace in

the Middle East;

Whereas Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization

signed the historic Declaration of Principles on Interim
2

•HRES 566 IH

Self-Government Arrangements (DOP) at the White

House on September 13, 1993;

Whereas Article III of the DOP calls for elections in the

West Bank and Gaza Strip with the goal of holding the

election no later than 9 months after the entry into force

of the DOP so that the Palestinian people may govern

themselves according to democratic principles;

Whereas the DOP calls for the direct, free, and general election of a ‘‘Council’’ under the supervision of international

observers;

Whereas on May 4, 1994, the Government of Israel and the

Palestine Liberation Organization signed an interim

agreement on self-rule in the Gaza Strip and the Jericho

area that reaffirms the election of a Palestinian Council

(Article III.6); and

Whereas Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and PLO

Chairman Yasser Arafat met in Gaza on September

25, 1994, to discuss the issue of Palestinian elections

in the West Bank and Gaza and agreed to continue

negotiations on the issue in the coming months: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) urges Israel and the Palestine Liberation

3 Organization (PLO) to reach agreement on the mo4 dalities for holding free and democratic elections in

5 Gaza and the West Bank at the earliest possible

6 moment;

7 (2) calls upon the Administration to assist Is8 rael and the Palestinian Council in negotiating the
3

•HRES 566 IH

1 election modalities promptly and to offer the assist2 ance of United States agencies and institutions in

3 the preparation for Palestinian elections; and

4 (3) urges that universal suffrage be afforded to

5 all qualified Palestinians, including residents of East

6 Jerusalem and displaced Palestinians registered be7 fore June 4, 1967, as stipulated in the Declaration

8 of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrange9 ments (DOP), without reference to race, religion,

10 gender, or citizenship.

Æ
# C_2023035EN.01005501.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/55

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Allessa v EUIPO — Dumerth (CASSELLAPARK)

(Case T-701/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - EU word mark CASSELLAPARK - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Lack of descriptive character - Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public - Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2023/C 35/65)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Allessa GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: S. Fröhlich, M. Hartmann and H. Lerchl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Carim Dumerth (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: T. Wieland and C. Corbet, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 August 2021 (Case R 1043/2020-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Rejects the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Rejects the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Allessa GmbH to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Allessa GmbH to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.

---
# AVIATION ADVISORS, LLC



## johnsabel@aviationadvisors.com
January 23, 2015 

# RECEIV JAN 282015 

# HEARING DOOC

CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Hearing Docket Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Attn.: Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-430 WilburWright Building, Room 2014 Washington, D.C. 20591

To Whom It May Concern: RE: Docket No. 2013EA030023 Laurel Avionics Co., Inc.

Enclosed please find a completed Option Selection Form requesting a formal hearing in the above-referenced matter pertaining to my client, Laurel Avionics Co., Inc. A copy ofthis request has also been sent to FAA attorney Mr. Zachary M. Berman. Please direct all communications regarding this materto my attentron at the address below. Very Truly Yours, 

# )lv.- '\(·.··

# YilQ

John V. Sabel, Esq. Enclosure: Option Selection Form Cc: Mr. Zachary M. Berman

'!·I

## Option SelectionForm 

# RECEIVE

Regional Counselforthe Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 

# JAN 282015 HEARING DOC 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica,NY 11434 Laurel Avionics Company, Inc.- 2013EA030023 Subject Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty Response Attachment In reply to your Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty Laurel Avionics Company, Inc. elects to proceed as indicated by its check mark beside the numbered paragraph below: 

### 1. L) Laurel Avionics Company, Inc. hereby submits 

### the amount ofthe proposed civil penalty with the understanding that 

### an Order Assessing Civil Penalty will be issued in that amount. 2. L/LaurelAvionics Company, Inc. herebyrequests a formal hearing in accordance with Section 13.16 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations. By sending this form to the Federal Aviation Administration, Eastern Region, Laurel Avionics Company, Inc. also hereby certifies that a copy ofthis form has been filed with the Hearing Docket Clerk (Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence A venue, S.W., Room**~A,** Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk).**·~14-** 

## ** Please note that Laurel Avionics Company Inc. will not be entitled to a hearing if it files this form with the .Federal Aviation Administration. Eastern Re2:ion. VvlTHOUT having filed this fonn or awritten request for a hearing with the HEARING DOCKET CLERK.**A110R~EY/REPRESENTATIVE** Name: 

# Jvh" V

# :S,,,c<~Q,\ Firm: P,.."V·<"'---'t-,r:;.,-._ 

### A "t'<,t**~s.:_:(·:s.** L**~--C** Address:

### ·~Si."2. 1'1"\.•f\""t·"'" ):y-·. ,.

### {'{\::)_::,;.,_~:"-.)AS\'..._,(), 

# Rl\- IS\0'( PhoneNo. ·7**~-4·-** <--1.$ 7- ?
..:::;, 

## 1 ·



## 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,186
<SECURITIES>                                       753
<RECEIVABLES>                                      708
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        631
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,299
<PP&E>                                          64,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,640
<BONDS>                                         10,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,092
<SALES>                                          6,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,380
<CGS>                                            5,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,920
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                       671
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,491
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33


</TABLE>
#### Philip S. Gellman, Respondent, v Fred Pettit, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[722 NYS2d 211]

Appeal unanimously *969dismissed without costs *(see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy,*140 AD2d 988; *Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts,*63 AD2d 566, 567; *see also,*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hayes, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Habersham Bancorp:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-64149, 33-61587, 33-61589, and 333-48507 on Forms S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 333-18023 on Form S-3 of Habersham Bancorp of our report dated
January 17, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Habersham
Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 Annual report
on Form 10-K of Habersham Bancorp. Our report refers to changes in the methods
of accounting for goodwill in 2002 and for derivative instruments and hedging
activities in 2001.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        KPMG LLP



Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 2003
NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                     Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of Registrant
                               as of June 29, 2000

N.E.T. APLA, Inc.                      (State of Incorporation: Delaware)
N.E.T. China, Inc.                     (State of Incorporation: Delaware)
N.E.T. Credit Corporation              (State of Incorporation: California)
N.E.T. Europe Ltd.                     (Incorporated Under the Laws of England)
N.E.T. Europe S.A.                     (Incorporated Under the Laws of France)
N.E.T. Federal, Inc.                   (State of Incorporation: Delaware)
N.E.T. International, Inc              (Incorporated Under the Laws of Barbados)
N.E.T. Japan, Inc                      (State of Incorporation: Delaware)
Network Equipment Technologies
 Europe GmbH                           (Incorporated Under the Laws of Germany)
FlowWise Networks, Inc.                (State of Incorporation: California)


                                    Page 66
Exhibit 10.37


 


PROMISSORY NOTE (“NOTE”) - 0% SIMPLE
INTEREST


 


$3,240


11/02/2020


 


 


For VALUE RECEIVED, SYBLEU INC. (“Borrower”)
promises to pay to BST Partners (“Lender”) the principal sum of Three Thousand Two Hundred and Forty Dollars [$3,240.00]
with no interest to accrue on the balance. The said principal shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America
at the demand of the Lender. This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. The Borrower
hereby waives any notice of the transfer of this Note by the Lender or by any subsequent holder of this Note, agrees to remain
bound by the terms of this Note subsequent to any transfer, and agrees that the terms of this Note may be fully enforced by any
subsequent holder of this Note. All terms and conditions of this Note shall be interpreted under the laws of the state of California
and venue shall be the state of California.


 


 


 


SYBLEU INC.( Borrower)


 


By/s/David Koos 


CHAIRMAN AND CEO


 


Accepted By:


 


BST PARTNERS (Lender)


 


By:/s/David Koos


 


CHAIRMAN AND CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1186 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1186

                For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 1993

   Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANT OF NATURALIZATION TO OLGA D. ZHONDETSKAYA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, Olga 
D. Zhondetskaya shall be naturalized as a citizen of the United States 
upon the filing of the appropriate application and upon being 
administered the oath of renunciation and allegiance in an appropriate 
ceremony pursuant to section 337 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
    (b) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) 
shall apply only if the application for naturalization is filed with 
appropriate fees within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Mark T. DetillionMark T. DetillionChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
August 12, 2010 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: March 20, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Howard J. Hoffman, EPA - OGC

SUBJECT: March 20, 2015 Meeting with Advanced Energy Economy Regarding Proposed 

Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

On March 20, 2015, Kevin Culligan of OAR and I met with Arvin Ganesan and Matt Stanberry

of Advanced Energy Economy to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan 

for existing power plants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DAY
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,826
<PP&E>                                          49,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,713
<BONDS>                                        256,262
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,857
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (83,706)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,715
<SALES>                                         42,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,556
<CGS>                                           26,738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (160)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (342)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (342)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6338** 

KAMAL NASSEREE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:11

- ct

- 03223

- BO )

Submitted : July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Kamal Nasseree , Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kamal Nass eree appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief in his negligence action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671

– 2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 201 5 ). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordi ngly, we affirm
. Cf. Logue v. United States , 412 U.S. 521, 529

- 30 (1979) (no federal Government liability for negligent supervision of county jail employees where Bureau of Prisons lacked authority to physically supervise jail employees); Humphries v. N.C . Dep’t of Corr. , 479 S.E.2d 27, 28 (N.C. App. 1996) (holding that there can be no negligence where defendant owes no duty). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, J. Gordon Huszagh, President & Chief
Executive Officer of Suffolk Bancorp (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained
in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|Dated: December 20, 2011           
|                                   
|/s/ J. Gordon Huszagh              
|J. Gordon Huszagh                  
|President & Chief Executive Officer
1 B E C K H A M
, L I SA

Fr o m: R i c h a rd.Gri me s@a p s

. c om S e nt: T u e s d ay , J un e 10
, 2014 11 : 18 AM T o: L ee , A nita S u b j ec t: Mo d e l in p ut inf o r m a ti on Att a chme nt s: F CPP_ D e p

_ A nn

_ AR E A

_ H 2 S O4

_ Stud y A r ea .xl s x.txt

I w ill call y o u t o r e v i e w t h i s w i t h y o u

.

--- NO T I C E

-- -
Th i s m e ss a g e i s f

o r t h e d e s i g n a t e d r e c i p i e n t on l y a nd m a y c on t a i n c o n f i d e n ti a l , p r i v il e g e d o r

p r op r i e t a r y i n f o r m a ti on. I f y ou h a v e rece i v e d it i n err o r , p l ea s e no ti f y t h e s e nd er imm e d i a t e l y a nd d e l e t e t h e o r i g i n a l a nd

a n y c o p y o r p r i n t ou t

. U n i n t e nd e d rec i p i e n t s are p r oh i b it e d fr o m m a k i n g a n y o t h er u s e o f t h i s e- m a il

. A lt hou g h

w e h a v e t a k e n r ea son a

b l e p re c a u ti ons t o e nsu re n o v i r

us e s are p re s e n t i n t h i s e- m a il , w e a cce p t no l i a b ili t y f o r
a n y l oss o r d a m a g e ar i s i n g f r o m t h e us e o f t h i s e

- m a il o r a tt ac h m e n t s, o r f o r a n y d e l a y o r e r r o r s o r o mi ss i ons i n t h e c on t e n t s w h i c h r e su lt fr o m e- m a il t ra ns mi ss i on.