alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Perry Law, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,

not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant

and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known

to us by others within those entities, particularly during the

period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about

the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of

the end of the period covered by this report based on such

evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the

registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth

quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design

or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Perry Law

---------------------------

Perry Law

Chief Executive Officer



February
13, 2007
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 

MEMORANDUM 

DA TE: September 4, 2014 

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION PREVENTION 

PC Code: 128973 

DP Barcode: 418735 

SUBJECT: EPA Response to Waiver Request for an Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism study 

(GLN 835.4400) in Support of the Registration Review of Primisulfuron-methyl. 

TO: Christina Scheltema, Chemical Review Manager 

Michael Goodis, Chief RM53 

Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division 

7508P 

FROM: Andrew Shelby, Physical Scientist ~ ....?' ~ /' 1- '1 · fl( 

Environmental Risk Branch 6 / """ / 

Environmental Fates and Effects Division 

7507P 

THROUGH: Mark Corbin, Branch Chief /) II () r I 

Environmental Risk Branch 6 ~ ~ Environmental Fates and Effects Division 

7507P 

ln response to the posting in the public docket of the ··Primisulfuron-methyl Generic Data Call-In 

Notice (Document ID EPA-HQ-OPP-20 I l-0844-0014 in www.regulation.gov), the registrant 

Syngenta Crop Protection provided a waiver request related to the data request Jor an anaerobic 

aquatic metabolism study for primisulfuron-methyl. EPA requested the data to better 

parameterize the surface water modeling as currently 2X the anaerobic soil metabolism value is 

conservatively assumed. The purpose of this memorandum is to address the waiver requests for 

this study. 

Syngenta provides a sensitivity analysis (MRID 49318201) assuming EPA's conservative 

estimate of anaerobic aquatic metabolism in the absence of data (half-life = 178 days) and an 

assumed least conservative value (half-life = 1 day). Using the PE5 shell of PRZM/EXAMS, 

acute values varied by up to 6% and chronic values varied by up to 8%. Syngenta concludes that 

conducting an anaerobic aquatic metabolism study has very low potential to add value to either a 
drinking water assessment or ecological risk assessment. Therefore, Syngenta accepts the EPA's 

proposed primisulfuron-methyl anaerobic aquatic metabolism half-life of 178 days (total test 

system) for risk assessment purposes rather than conducting a new study. 

The Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) recommends accepting this waiver request 

from Syngenta as they have demonstrated the impact of the requested data would be small and 

they accept the conservative assumption made in its absence. 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 728 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 728

Expressing support for the designation of a ``Small Business Saturday'' 
 and supporting efforts to increase awareness of the value of locally 
                        owned small businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2014

 Mr. Graves of Missouri submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of a ``Small Business Saturday'' 
 and supporting efforts to increase awareness of the value of locally 
                        owned small businesses.

Whereas, there are 28,200,000 small businesses in the United States;
Whereas small businesses represent 99.7 percent of all businesses with employees 
        in the United States;
Whereas small businesses employ over 48 percent of the employees in the private 
        sector in the United States;
Whereas small businesses pay over 42 percent of the total payroll of the 
        employees in the private sector in the United States;
Whereas small businesses constitute 98 percent of firms exporting goods;
Whereas small businesses are responsible for more than 46 percent of private 
        sector output;
Whereas small businesses generated 63 percent of net new jobs created from 1993 
        through 2013; and
Whereas November 29, 2014, is an appropriate day to designate as ``Small 
        Business Saturday'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of a ``Small Business 
        Saturday''; and
            (2) supports efforts--
                    (A) to encourage consumers to shop locally; and
                    (B) to increase awareness of the value of locally 
                owned small businesses and the impact of locally owned 
                small businesses on the economy of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2023223EN.01000301.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — R.I. v Inspecţia Judiciară, N.L.

(Case C-817/21, (1) Inspecţia Judiciară)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Rule of law - Judicial independence - Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU - Decision 2006/928/EC - Independence of the judiciary - Disciplinary proceedings - Judicial Inspectorate - Chief Inspector with powers of regulation, selection, assessment, appointment and disciplinary investigation)

(2023/C 223/03)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: R.I.

Defendant: Inspecţia Judiciară, N.L.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, read in conjunction with Commission Decision 2006/928/EC of 13 December 2006 establishing a mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption,

must be interpreted as precluding national legislation:

| — | which confers on the director of a body competent to conduct investigations and bring disciplinary proceedings against judges and prosecutors the power to adopt acts of a normative and individual nature relating, inter alia, to the organisation of that body, the selection of its staff members, their assessment, the conduct of their activities and the appointment of a deputy director, |
| --- | --- |

—

which confers on the director of a body competent to conduct investigations and bring disciplinary proceedings against judges and prosecutors the power to adopt acts of a normative and individual nature relating, inter alia, to the organisation of that body, the selection of its staff members, their assessment, the conduct of their activities and the appointment of a deputy director,

| — | where, first of all, those members of staff and the deputy director alone are competent to conduct a disciplinary investigation against that director, next, their careers depend, to a large extent, on the decisions of that director and, finally, the term of office of the deputy director will end at the same time as that of the director, |
| --- | --- |

—

where, first of all, those members of staff and the deputy director alone are competent to conduct a disciplinary investigation against that director, next, their careers depend, to a large extent, on the decisions of that director and, finally, the term of office of the deputy director will end at the same time as that of the director,

when that legislation is not designed in such a way that there can be no reasonable doubt, in the minds of individuals, that the powers and functions of that body will not be used as an instrument to exert pressure on, or political control over, the activity of those judges and prosecutors.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 19.4.2022.

---
EXHIBIT 10.3

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$20,000.00                         Dallas, Texas                October 14, 1996


         FOR VALUE  RECEIVED,  Preferred/Telecom,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation
promises  to pay to the order of  Lawrence E.  Steinberg,  at 5420 LBJ  Freeway,
Suite 540, LB 56,  Dallas,  Texas 75240,  or at such other address as the holder
hereof may designate, the principal sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00),
together  with  interest on the unpaid  principal  balance  from the date hereof
until this note is paid in full at a rate of 10% per annum.

         Principal and interest shall be payable in one  installment on November
25, 1996.

         All payments  received shall be applied first to the payment of accrued
interest and then to the payment of principal.

         Maker shall have the right to prepay any and all amounts due  hereunder
without penalty for the privilege of doing so.

         No payment shall be considered in default  unless it is not paid within
ten (10) days after delivery of written notice of nonpayment.

         In the event  default is made in the  payment of this Note,  the unpaid
balance on this Note shall at once become due and payable,  without  notice,  at
the option of the Holder. Failure to exercise this option shall not constitute a
waiver of the right to declare the entire  principal  due and payable at once at
any subsequent time.

         If, after default,  this Note is placed in the hands of an attorney for
collection,  or if collected  through judicial  proceeding,  Maker shall pay, in
addition to the sums  referred to above,  a reasonable  sum as a  collection  or
attorneys'  fee and all other  costs  incurred  by Holder in  collection  of the
unpaid amounts due hereunder.

         This note is secured  evidenced by a security  interest granted under a
Security Agreement of even date herewith between maker and payee.

         Each maker, surety,  guarantor,  endorser or other party liable for the
payment of this Note, in whole or in part,  hereby expressly waives  presentment
and demand for payment,  notice of intention to accelerate  maturity,  notice of
acceleration of maturity, protest and notice of protest and nonpayment, bringing
of suit and  diligence  in taking any action to collect sums owing  hereon,  and
agree that this Note,  and any payment  hereunder,  may be extended from time to
time without in any way affecting such liability.

PROMISSORY NOTE - Page 1

CORPDAL:58183.1  26287-00001

<PAGE>


                                                     MAKER:

                                                     PREFERRED/TELECOM, INC.


                                                     By:
                                                              G. Ray Miller
                                                              Its:  Chairman



PROMISSORY NOTE - Page 2

CORPDAL:58183.1  26287-00001
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Anton io, Texas

June 27, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00237

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.J.G., A CHILD

,

Appellant

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA01800 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. The reporter’s record was originally due to be filed on May 28, 2019

. By order dated June 11, 2019, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record, Ms. Angie Jimen ez, was ordered to file the reporter’s record by Friday, June 21, 2019. This court’s order stated, “ NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED

. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(b)(2) (precluding appellate court from granting extensions of time to file record in excess of thirty days cumulatively in parental termination ap peals ).

On Monday, June 24, 2019, Ms. Jimenez contacted the court and stated she would file the reporter’s record by Tuesday, June 25, 2019. On Wednesday, June 26, 2019, Ms. Jimenez filed a notification of late record stating she had not been paid the f ee for preparing and filing the reporter’s record . The clerk’s record shows appellant is represented by retained counsel.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date of this order,

and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). If appellant files written proof that the reporter’s fee has been paid or that he is enti tled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee, Ms. Jimenez is ORDERED to file the reporter’s record the day after such written proof is filed._________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
256 La. 619

#### Joan Beggs CHAPIN v. Bobbie Thomas CHAPIN.

No. 50693.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 29, 1970.

In re: Bobbie Thomas Chapin applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 234 So.2d 781.

Application denied. Judgment not final. .
No. 00-1038.

#### Rodriguez *v.*United States.

C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.
256 La. 612

#### Gertrude BOUTERIE et al. v. T. W. KLEINPETER et al.

No. 50695.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 29, 1970.

In re: Gertrude Bouterie and Mrs. Alma B. Leckert applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Lafourche, 234 So.2d 812.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### In re ESTATE of Grace G. DIX, Deceased.

No. 67-297.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 6, 1967.

Appeal quashed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Vernon BRANAUGH.

No. 60736.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

George P. Bevan, McKinnis, Juban & Be-van, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EQK REALTY INVESTORS I FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       135,875
<OTHER-SE>                                    (138,896)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,603
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,174
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,488)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.16)


</TABLE>
#### Clemente LOPEZ and Johnnie Simmons, Petitioners, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40997.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 12, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 245 So.2d 309.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-133451 and 333-98705 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 13, 2006
relating to the financial statements of Interchange Financial Services
Corporation, and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
Interchange Financial Services Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
_________________________

New York, New York
April 28, 2006
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIE E. COBB,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-1711

[March 23, 2016]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562009CF000718A.

Willie E. Cobb, Avon Park, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard 

Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. See Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1992).

CIKLIN, C.J., TAYLOR and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 700 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 134
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 700

                          [Report No. 113-570]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2014

     Mr. Cole, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported through the legislative day of September 5, 2014, 
providing for consideration or disposition of measures relating to the 
ongoing humanitarian crisis on the U.S. southern border, border 
security, and related immigration law.
    Sec. 2.  It shall be in order at any time through the legislative 
day of September 5, 2014, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the 
House suspend the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV, relating 
to measures addressing the ongoing humanitarian crisis on the U.S. 
southern border, border security, and related immigration law.
                                                 House Calendar No. 134

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 700

                          [Report No. 113-570]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 31, 2014

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```