Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2023 ALJ Decisions
                              In re LCD Complaint:  CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis (L34415), DAB CR6339 (2023)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




In re LCD Complaint:  CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis (L34415), DAB CR6339 (2023)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





*In re LCD Complaint:*
CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis
LCD ID Number: L34415
Contractor: Palmetto GBA
Docket No. C-23-628Decision No. CR6339August 25, 2023

        
              
    

      DECISION DISMISSING COMPLAINT

On August 2, 2023, the Civil Remedies Division received the Aggrieved Party’s submission, consisting of a complaint and supporting documents.  The Aggrieved Party reported that Palmetto GBA, a Medicare contractor, applied the “wrong code” when it denied reimbursement for an April 5, 2023 CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis, and that it should have applied “A56421,” a billing and coding article, rather than local coverage determination (LCD) L34415, “CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis.”  The Aggrieved Party, who is *pro se*, argued that application of A56421 would have yielded a favorable determination that her CT scan was a medically necessary procedure.

***The Aggrieved Party has filed a complaint, an amended complaint, and supporting documents; dismissal is required pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 426.410(c) because the Aggrieved Party did not file an acceptable complaint.1***

In an order dated August 14, 2023, I acknowledged receipt of the Aggrieved Party’s complaint.  I explained that, pursuant to the applicable regulations, I am required to determine if the complaint is acceptable.  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 426.410(b).  I further explained that I must determine whether the complaint meets the requirements for a valid complaint as set forth in 42 C.F.R. § 426.400.  I informed the Aggrieved Party that she had not filed an acceptable complaint, explaining:

Page 2

The Aggrieved Party’s one-page complaint did not list her claim number, the full title of the LCD being challenged, or the Medicare contractor.  42 C.F.R. § 426.400(c)(1)(v), (c)(4)(i)-(ii).  And to the extent the Aggrieved Party has been denied coverage pursuant to LCD L34415, the Aggrieved Party has not identified any specific provision of LCD L34415 that adversely affects her.  42 C.F.R. § 426.400(c)(4)(iii).  Nor has the Aggrieved Party articulated why the provision(s) of that LCD are not valid under the reasonableness standard.  42 C.F.R. § 426.400(c)(5).  Finally, the Aggrieved Party did not submit clinical or scientific evidence supporting her complaint, nor did she explain how this evidence shows that the LCD is not reasonable.  42 C.F.R. § 426.400(c)(6).

August 14, 2023 Order at 3 (footnote omitted).  Additionally, I explained that “to the extent the Aggrieved Party argues that the Medicare contractor should have relied on a billing and coding article, A56421, rather than LCD L34415, I cannot review such a matter.”  I further explained that, pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 426.110, the scope of my review is “whether an LCD is valid under the reasonableness standard.”

I directed the Aggrieved Party to submit a response addressing the items discussed in the paragraph quoted above.  I also directed the Aggrieved Party to clarify whether she is “actually challenging an LCD provision.”

When an Aggrieved Party files an unacceptable complaint, an administrative law judge must offer the Aggrieved Party an opportunity to amend the complaint, pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 426.410(c)(1).  If the Aggrieved Party fails to submit an acceptable amended complaint within the timeframe set by the ALJ, the ALJ “must issue a decision dismissing the unacceptable complaint.”  42 C.F.R. § 426.410(c).

I afforded the Aggrieved Party an opportunity to amend her unacceptable complaint, and the Aggrieved Party filed a response to my order, to include an amended complaint and supporting documents.  However, the Aggrieved Party did not articulate why the provision(s) of that LCD are not valid under the reasonableness standard.  42 C.F.R. § 426.400(c)(5).  Additionally, the Aggrieved Party neither submitted clinical or scientific evidence supporting her complaint (i.e., showing that a provision of the LCD is not reasonable), nor explained how this evidence shows that the LCD is not reasonable.  42 C.F.R. § 426.400(c)(6).  Because the Aggrieved Party did not file an acceptable complaint, I am required to dismiss the unacceptable complaint.  42 C.F.R. § 426.410(c).

**I am referring the Aggrieved Party’s complaint to the Medicare contractor for consideration as a timely request for redetermination.**

Page 3

Based on my review of the Aggrieved Party’s complaint and amended complaint, it appears that the Aggrieved Party may not be challenging the reasonableness of a provision or provisions of L34415, itself, but rather, is attempting to challenge Palmetto GBA’s application of L34415 to her circumstances.  Specifically, the Aggrieved Party stated the following in her amended complaint:

As stated in Exhibit 2, the contractor, Palmetto GBA, jurisdiction M, used the LCD L34415 in this denial.  According to the cms.gov Medicare coverage database and coverage guidance, “The CT scan of the abdomen will be considered medically reasonable and necessary under the following circumstance:  “Evaluation of known or suspected abdominal masses.”  Further, it states that “A CT scan of the pelvis will be considered medically necessary and reasonable under the following circumstances:  “evaluation of cysts, tumors, or masses of the pelvic structure.”  This appeal challenges Palmetto’s assessment that the procedure was medically unnecessary.  The Doctor statement in exhibit 1 clearly states this medical necessity.

Amended Complaint at 1.  It appears that the Aggrieved Party is arguing that had the Medicare contractor correctly applied L34415, it would have approved reimbursement for her April 5, 2023 CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis.  I do not have the authority to decide whether a Medicare claim should be paid or denied.  42 C.F.R. § 426.455(b).  My role is limited to deciding a legal challenge to an LCD provision or provisions.  42 U.S.C. § 1395ff(f).  The review of a Medicare claim that was purportedly wrongly decided based on reliance on an LCD involves a completely separate process than the review of whether an LCD provision is reasonable.  42 C.F.R. § 426.310.  To the extent the Aggrieved Party’s complaint can be interpreted as a challenge to how Palmetto applied the LCD, rather than a challenge to the reasonableness of the LCD, itself, I have directed Civil Remedies Division staff to forward this decision, along with a copy of all of the Aggrieved Party’s filings in this matter, for consideration by the Medicare contractor as a timely filed request for redetermination.  *See*42 C.F.R. § 405.942(a).

I note that the Aggrieved Party submitted a May 2, 2023 statement from her physician that she has a history of “malignant desmoid fibromatosis status post surgical resection . . . [that] requires surveillance CT scan [i]maging to ensure that there is no evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease.”  Aggrieved Party (AP) Ex. 1 at 1.  The Aggrieved Party’s physician further reported that the April 5, 2023 CT scan was a “medically necessary imaging procedure to ensure no evidence of recurrent disease that might need further treatment for curative [i]ntent.”  AP Ex. 1 at 1.  As previously discussed, the Aggrieved Party stated in her amended complaint that, pursuant to L34415, “[t]he CT

Page 4

scan of the abdomen will be considered medically reasonable and necessary . . . [for] evaluation of known or suspected abdominal masses” and “[a] CT scan of the pelvis will be considered medically necessary and reasonable . . . [for] evaluation of cysts, tumors, or masses of the pelvic structure.”  Based on the Aggrieved Party’s arguments and supporting evidence, I encourage the Medicare contractor to consider whether evidence of “malignant desmoid fibromatosis status post resection” that has been determined by a physician to require “surveillance” satisfies the provisions of L34415 regarding the medical necessity for a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis.

If the Aggrieved Party has additional information or arguments she wishes to submit as part of a request for redetermination, she may do so by following the instructions on page 6 of the Medicare contractor’s initial notice, dated June 30, 2023.  *See*AP Ex. 3.  I emphasize that the notice informed the Aggrieved Party that an appeal must be filed no later than **September 4, 2023**.2

In summary, the Aggrieved Party neither filed an acceptable complaint nor submitted an acceptable amended complaint.  Therefore, I dismiss the complaint pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 426.410(c)(2).  It appears that the basis for the Aggrieved Party’s challenge is that Palmetto GBA incorrectly applied L34415, and such a matter is outside of my jurisdiction because I may only review the *reasonableness* of an LCD provision or provisions rather than whether the contractor *correctly applied* an LCD provision or provisions.  *See*42 C.F.R. § 426.455(b).  Contemporaneous to the issuance of this decision dismissing the complaint, a copy of this decision and the Aggrieved Party’s submissions will be forwarded to Palmetto GBA for consideration as a request for redetermination.

Endnotes

1  Findings of fact and conclusions of law are in italics and bold font.

2  With a goal of ensuring that the Aggrieved Party has sufficient notice and opportunity to submit evidence and arguments in support of a redetermination request, the Civil Remedies Division expedited issuance of this decision dismissing the unacceptable complaint.
  
          /s/
        Leslie C. Rogall

                      Administrative Law Judge Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back