alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022237EN.01005402.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/54

---

Order of the General Court of 29 March 2022 — Gustopharma Consumer Health v EUIPO — Helixor Heilmittel (HELIXORIGINAL)

(Case T-797/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 237/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gustopharma Consumer Health, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Wachinger and R. Drozdz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Helixor Heilmittel GmbH (Rosenfield, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 October 2021 (Case R 1644/2019-1), in relation to opposition proceedings between Helixor Heilmittel and Gustopharma Consumer Health.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Gustopharma Consumer Health, SL shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Gustopharma Consumer Health, SL shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.

---
[No. 745-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

October 18, 1971.]

#### Ruth Vaughns, *Respondent,*v. Douglas W. McCann *et al., Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 706632, Horton Smith, J., entered May 14, 1970. *Remanded*with instructions by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
1

M E M O RANDU M

To : S e w a g e S l udg e I n c i n e r a t o r D o c k e t

F r om : A m

y H a m b r i c k

, U S E P A

D a t e : N o v e m

b e r 23

, 2010

Sub j ec t: M ee t i n g w i t h N A C W A

, N o v e m b e r 18

, 2010 f

r o m 12 : 00

- 1 : 30 p m ( D 201 )

A tt e nd a n ce

E P A NAC W A E R G

A m y H a m b r i c k R o b e r t D o mi n a k R o y O o mm e n

K e t a n P a t e l C h r i s H o r nb ec k A m b e r A ll e n

R o b i n D u n k i n s D o ug M c W illi a m s

W e n d y B l a k e

P e t e r T s i r i g o t i s

E r i c G i n s b u r g

P e t e r W e s t li n

N A C W A r e qu e s t e d a f

o ll o w up m

ee t i n g w it h

E P A h e l d o n N o v e m

b e r 18

, 2010

. N A C W A

p r o v i d e d E P A w i t h a g e n e r a l v e r b a l o v e r v i e w o f t h e i r m a j o r c o mm e n t s o n t h e SS I p r o p o s e d r u l e s

. N A C W A c o mm

u n i ca t e d t o E P A t h a t t h e y w ill b e s u b mi tt i n g a c o m p r e h e n s i v e d o c u m

e n t t o t h e

SS I D o c k e t w i t h t h e i

r c o m p l e t e li s t o f c o mm

e n t s

.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 17, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 33165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15164]



[[Page 33165]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 301

[REG-102951-16]
RIN 1545-BN36


Filing Requirements for Information Returns Required on Magnetic 
Media (Electronically); Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to a notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to notice of proposed 
rulemaking (REG-102951-16) that was published in the Federal Register 
on Thursday, May 31, 2018 (83 FR 24948). The proposed regulations are 
relating to amending rules for determining whether information returns 
must be filed by using magnetic media (electronically).

DATES: Written or electronic comments and request for a public hearing 
for the notice of proposed rulemaking at 83 FR 24948, May 31, 2018, are 
still being accepted and must be received by July 30, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations, 
Michael Hara at (202) 317-6845; concerning the submission of comments 
and request for a public hearing, Regina L. Johnson, (202) 317-5177 
(not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking that is subject of this document 
is under section 6011 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-102951-16) 
contains an error that may prove to be misleading and are in need of 
clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, in the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-102951-16) 
that is subject to FR Doc. 2018-11749, beginning on page 24948 in the 
issue of May 31, 2018, make the following correction in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. On page 24949 in the first column, 
under the caption ``Explanation of Provisions'', the last line from the 
bottom of the second full paragraph, the language ``Sec.  301.6011-2 
(c)(1)(iv), Example 4.'' is corrected to read ``Sec.  301.6011-2 
(b)(4).''.

Martin V. Franks,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2018-15164 Filed 7-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
04/20/201 1 14:5 9 FA X 202483514 2 0d/20/201 1 ll;i) 0 1202457779 9 FA A * DMS WICKS-FA

X 0002/00 3 PAG E 02/0 3

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N I n th e Matte r

of : Federa l Expres s Corporatio n :ARTMEN TO F ••:3P0RTATI0 N i i OPERATION S -^1: 5 FA A DOCKE T CP10NM000 8 FAA Cas e No , 2008NM70020 S DM S Ho . FAA-2010-079 2 Judge : RichardC . Goodwi n Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin ; NOTIC EO FAPPKARANC E Pleas e ente r

di e appearanc e o f

Glenn P . Wick s andRoncevert D

- Almon da s attorney s o f recor dfor Federal Expres s Corporation , Responden t i n tti c above-reference daction . Servic e o f al l paper s b y U.S . Mail , expedite dcourier service , an

dperftnnsi l dftlivftT y shrml db e addresse da s follows : Glen n P . Wick s Roncevert D . Almon d Th e Wick s Group , PLL C 121 5 17'*'Street , N W Sumne r Annex , Fouit hFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 Tel : (202 ) 457-779 0 Fax:(202)457-779 9 Date dthi s 20*

^ da y u f April , 2011 . jSlerb P . Wic l Roncever t D . Almon d Ih e Wick s Group , PLL C 121 5 17 * Street , N W Sunmer Annex , Fourt

hFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 Tel : (707. ) 4^7-779 0 Fax:(202)457-779 9 Counse l for

Responden t04/20/201 1 14:5 9 FA X 202433514 2 04/20/201 1 11:4 0 1202457779 9 FA A - DM S WICKS-FA> ^ @|003/00 3 PAG E 03/0 3

CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E T hereb y certif

y Ihal lli c fyrcgoin g documen t ha s bee n scnl , vi afacsimil e an dexpedite d courie r servic e to : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue . S W Wilbu r Wright Building—^uit e 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Fax:(202)493-514 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n OfHcc o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . F.a!? t HuUdm e Gn^uni dFloor , R mE12-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Tel : (202 ) 366-213 9 Fax:(202)366-753 6 Mr . Scott Morris , Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f th e Rcgioiifl

t Counse l (ANM-7 ) 160 1 Lin dAve. , S.W . Renton , WA9R05 7 Tel ; (425)227-141 7 Fax : (425 ) 227-110 7 On e (I ) cop y andoriginal

On e (1 ) cop y

On e (1 ) cop y

Date dthi s 20" ^ da

y o f Apri l 2011 .

^h e Wiof c Group , PLL C 121 5 17*Strei=t,N W Sumner Annex , Fourt

hFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 Tel : (202 ) 457-779 0 Fax : (202 ) 457-779 9 Counse l fo

r Reeponde m
To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: Richard Krock <rkrock@vinylinfo.org> Date: 12/17/2010 09:48AM Subject: PVC MACT Questions from VI

Hello Jodi,

In preparing for the January workshop on the PVC MACT, we are completing some internal analysis of the data bases and a few questions have come up. For the resin analytes, has ERG begun calculating MACT floor yet, and which data base are they being directed to use?

a.) VI Concentration data base 9-28-10

b.) Resin mass data base from ERG portal

c.) Both

If ERG is using the resin mass data base from the ERG portal, will they be normalizing the data for production rate through the facility on that day? Also regarding the resin data, did Certainteed ever submit any resin analysis?

Overall have there been any revisions to the data bases on the ERG portal? One area to call to your attention is in the stack emissions data, a number of analytes names are either misspelled or entered slightly differently even though they are the same analyte from one facility to another. On the aggregated data, these types of inconsistencies give the appearance of unique analytes when they are the same ones found from other facilities.

Regarding the January workshop, given the importance of completing the PVC MACT rule, industry prefers to focus the time only on the PVC MACT analysis and discussion and not to include any time for EDC/VCM discussion. If the date has been set, please let me know so that we can begin to make travel arrangements. Please give me a call at your convenience to discuss this. Thank you.

Richard Krock Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute 1737 King Street Suite 390 Alexandria, VA 22314 Direct: 571.970.3392 Mobile: 571.216.4474 Fax: 571.970.3271 Email: rkrock@vinylinfo.org http://www.vinylinfo.org http://www.vinylindesign.com
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

iion. 'i. Gilbert hdms 

County Attorney 

Jrsper county 

Jrs.per, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion MO. +7l+.&3 

captioned matter 

fro= pour letter as 

epsrt%nt. 

Court have the 

t to an Indevex-, from .any 

at he is ree over his re@ar 

ch road Is under 

tractor. The Contractor h+s begun the work and has 

taken out e bridge 05 the rose for the purpose of constructing a new one, and in doing so, did not build a 

detour bridge for the traffic, and especially the School 

Bus of the Jasper Indevendent School District. There is 

a road on the other sike of the bridge that leads into a 
, 

a27
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 581 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 581

Relating to early organization of the House of Representatives for the 
                      One Hundred Fourth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

 Mr. Gephardt submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relating to early organization of the House of Representatives for the 
                      One Hundred Fourth Congress.

    Resolved, That any organizational caucus or conference in the House 
of Representatives for the One Hundred Fourth Congress may begin on or 
after November 27, 1994.
    Sec. 2. As used in this resolution, the term ``organizational 
caucus or conference'' means a party caucus or conference authorized to 
be called under section 202(a) of House Resolution 988, Ninety-third 
Congress, agreed to on October 8, 1974, and enacted into permanent law 
by chapter III of title I of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1975 
(2 U.S.C. 29a(a)).
```
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 bioventusTM INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE
OWNER OF FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE CLASS A COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001 PER SHARE, OF BIOVENTUS INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly
endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: SR. VICE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC (Brooklyn, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY: AUTHORIZED OFFICER 711 ARMSTRONG LANE PROOF OF: DECEMBER 2, 2020
COLUMBIA, TN 38401 BIOVENTUS INC. (931) 388-3003 WO—20000352    FACE OPERATOR: DKS PRODUCTION COORDINATOR: RACHAEL PORTER 931-305-2898 REV. 1 COLORS SELECTED FOR PRINTING: INTAGLIO PRINTS IN SC-13 RED. LOGO PRINTS IN 4 COLOR PROCESS. PLEASE INITIAL THE APPROPRIATE SELECTION FOR THIS
PROOF:    OK AS IS    OK WITH CHANGES    MAKE CHANGES AND SEND ANOTHER PROOF 












 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– Custodian TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor) JT TEN – as joint tenants with right under Uniform
Gifts to Minors of survivorship and not as Act tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) shares of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer
the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE THE CERTIFICATE SIGNATURE TO IN EVERY THIS ASSIGNMENT PARTICULAR, MUST WITHOUT CORRESPOND ALTERATION WITH OR THE
ENLARGEMENT NAME AS WRITTEN OR ANYCHANGE UPON THE WHATEVER. FACE OF Signature(s) Guaranteed: STOCKBROKERS, THE SIGNATURE(S) SAVINGS SHOULD AND LOAN BE GUARANTEED ASSOCIATIONS    BY AND AN CREDIT ELIGIBLE UNIONS GUARANTOR WITH
MEMBERSHIP INSTITUTION IN AN APPROVED (BANKS, SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.    711 ARMSTRONG LANE PROOF OF: OCTOBER 13, 2020 COLUMBIA, TN
38401 BIOVENTUS INC. (931) 388-3003 WO—20000352 BACK OPERATOR: DKS PRODUCTION COORDINATOR: RACHAEL PORTER 931-305-2898 NEW
PLEASE INITIAL THE APPROPRIATE SELECTION FOR THIS PROOF:    OK AS IS    OK WITH CHANGES    MAKE CHANGES AND SEND ANOTHER PROOF
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7087

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

BARRY L. COLEMAN, JR.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:05-cr-00367-JRS-1; 3:08-cv-00064-JRS)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: January 5, 2012

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry L. Coleman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Angela 

Mastandrea-Miller, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Barry L. Coleman, Jr. appeals from the district 

court’s orders denying his motions to file a notice of appeal 

out of time and for reconsideration in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West 2006 & Supp. 2011) proceeding. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court.*

 United States v. 

Coleman, Nos. 3:05-cr-00367-JRS-1; 3:08-cv-00064-JRS (E.D. Va. 

June 13 & July 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * In addition, Coleman claims he received ineffective 

assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal. However, there is no constitutional right to 

counsel in a collateral attack. See Hunt v. Nuth, 57 F.3d 1327, 

1340 (4th Cir. 1995). Thus, even if counsel in his § 2255 

proceeding was ineffective, that performance cannot give rise to 

a cognizable claim for relief. United States v. MacDonald, 966 

F.2d 854, 859 n.9 (4th Cir. 1992).
# C_2022084EN.01002901.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 13 December 2021 — AAS BTA Baltic Insurance Company v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, Tieslietu ministrija

(Case C-769/21)

(2022/C 84/38)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā rajona tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AAS BTA Baltic Insurance Company

Defendants: Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, Tieslietu ministrija

Question referred

Is national legislation which requires the contracting authority to terminate a procurement procedure in a situation where the originally selected tenderer, which declined to enter into the procurement contract with the contracting authority, must be considered to constitute a single market participant with the next tenderer, whose tender meets the contracting authority’s needs and requirements, compatible with the principles of procurement defined in Article 18(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, (1) in particular with the requirement for Member States to treat economic operators equally and without discrimination, and with the principle of proportionality?

---

(1)  OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.

---
Exhibit 32.2  CFO Certification

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Michael W. Eller , President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the "Company")  (the Registrant), and Michael W Eller, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) of the Registrant, each hereby certifies that, to the best of their knowledge::



1.

The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-2 of Electronic Systems Technology, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:  /s/ Michael W. Eller

Michael W. Eller, President

(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date:  August 27, 2018

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Annual Report and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.; and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John FULFORD.

No. 53574.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1973.

In re: John Fulford applying for remedial writs and writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion by denying the defendant permission to defend himself along with the assistance of counsel. Cf. State v. Frizzell, 273 So.2d 831 (La.Sup.Ct.1973).

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the defendant-applicant is entitled both to defend himself and to assistance of counsel.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Murphy CAMERON.

No. 60797.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

Barry F. Viosca, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sierra Health Services, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc R. Briggs,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Marc R.
Briggs


Marc R.
Briggs


Chief
Financial Officer


March 17,
2008
# C_2021513EN.01002002.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 28 September 2021 — A v Finanzamt M

(Case C-596/21)

(2021/C 513/30)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Nürnberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A

Defendant: Finanzamt M

Questions referred (1)

| 1. | Can the second purchaser of a good be refused the right of deduction in respect of the purchase because he or she should have known that the original seller had evaded value added tax (VAT) in the first sale, even though the first purchaser had known that the original seller had evaded VAT in the first sale? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can the second purchaser of a good be refused the right of deduction in respect of the purchase because he or she should have known that the original seller had evaded value added tax (VAT) in the first sale, even though the first purchaser had known that the original seller had evaded VAT in the first sale?

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, is the refusal of the right of deduction in the case of the second purchaser limited in terms of amount to the shortfall in tax revenue caused by the evasion? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, is the refusal of the right of deduction in the case of the second purchaser limited in terms of amount to the shortfall in tax revenue caused by the evasion?

| 3. | If Question 2 is answered in the affirmative, is the shortfall in tax revenue calculated






  a. | by comparing the tax lawfully payable in the supply chain with the tax actually assessed, |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

If Question 2 is answered in the affirmative, is the shortfall in tax revenue calculated

a.

by comparing the tax lawfully payable in the supply chain with the tax actually assessed,

| b. | by comparing the tax lawfully payable in the supply chain with the tax actually paid, or |
| --- | --- |

b.

by comparing the tax lawfully payable in the supply chain with the tax actually paid, or

| c. | in another way, and, if so, what way? |
| --- | --- |

c.

in another way, and, if so, what way?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---