alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 99-60115 Summary Calendar

__________________

PHUC CINH XUAN TROUNG,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

---------------------------------------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A-27-852-607

----------------------------------------------------

March 9, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Phuc Dinh Xuan Truong, a Vietnamese national, has filed a petition for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) final order of deportati on. Because the petition for review was filed

in excess of 30 days from the BIA’s decision, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider it. S ee Illegal

Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 § 309(c) (4)(C). Accordingly , the

petition for review is DISMISSED.

To the extent that Truong’s petition sounds in habeas, it is TRANSFERRED to the United

States District Court for the Western Dist rict o f Louisiana for disposition. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(b).

Truong’s motion for release on bond pending deportati on is similarly TRANSFERRED. Truong’s

motion for leave to amend his pleadings is DENIED.PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED; PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

TRANSFERRED; MOTION FOR RELEASE TRANSFERRED; MOTION TO A MEND DENIED.
252 La. 101

#### Joseph HARDY, Individually and as natural tutor of the minor child, David Hardy v. Julia B. BYE, wife of/and Albert A. Bye, Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company et al.

No. 49196.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1968.

In re: Joseph Hardy, individually and as natural tutor of the minor child, David Hardy, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Bernard. 207 So.2d 198.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in its judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                 389
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               8,691
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         27,057
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              13,066
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                12,919
<LOANS>                                             55,728
<ALLOWANCE>                                            197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     108,018
<DEPOSITS>                                          74,166
<SHORT-TERM>                                        19,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  1,376
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                11
<OTHER-SE>                                          13,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     108,018
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      1,152
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                      709
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                        94
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     1,955
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                     917
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,209
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                  746
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                           39
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      44
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                        455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        366
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                             366
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        7.55
<LOANS-NON>                                            160
<LOANS-PAST>                                             8
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        377
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                       158
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                            0
<RECOVERIES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                      197
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                   111
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                 86
        


</TABLE>
.:._ .. 

) 

CBIC Control Number 

358630 

C. H. PATRICK & CO., INC. RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

RECEfVEO 20 I Y FEB 2 5 M111: f 6 

MAR · R ·14 

February 12, 2014 EPA DOCKET CENTER 

Document Control Office (DC0)(7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW 

Washington, DC 20460-001 

II 

ATTN: TSCA Section 4- Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

RE: Application for Exemption, TSCA Section 4 Test Rule, C. I. Leuco Sulphur Black 1 

(CASRN 66241-11-0), Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals; Second 

Group of Chemicals, 76 FR 1067, January 7, 2011. 

·-7 Dear Sir or Madam: 

C. H. Patrick & Company, Inc. submits this application for exemption from the 

requirements for testing C. I. Leuco Sulphur Black 1 (CASRN 66241-11-0} under the 

applicable TSCA Section 4 Test Rule as referenced above. 

As part of our exemption application we are providing the following information: 

1. The identity of the test rule, the chemical name, and the CASRN of the test 

substance on which the application is based: 

Scanned & Processed in 

CIS by: SHARON 

• Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals; Second Group of 

Chemicals, Federal Register, 76 FR 1067, January 7, 2011. 

• C. I. Leuco Sulphur Black 1 (CASRN 66241-11-0) 

2. We are requesting an exemption from all testing requirements for C. I. Leuco 

Sulphur Black 1 (CASRN 66241-11-0) because we are aware that another 

company has sponsored the testing and reporting. 

3. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant: 

• C. H. Patrick & Company, Inc. 

1806 Perimeter Road 

Greenville, SC 29605 

(864) 422-2301 

1806 Perimeter Rd. Greenville, SC 29605, (800) 526-2793, Fax: (864) 277-8569 
C. H. PATRICK & CO., INC. 

4. Name, address and telephone number of appropriate individual to contact for 

further information: 

• Thomas J. Reardon 

1806 Perimeter Road 

Greenville, SC 29605 

(864) 422-2646 

C. H. Patrick & Company, Inc. provides, as part of our application for exemption, the 

following statement of financial responsibility consistent with 40 CFR 790.99: 

I (C. H. Patrick & Company, Inc.) understand that if this application is granted 

before the reimbursement period described in Section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, 

C. H. Patrick & Company, Inc. must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the 

person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the 

requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application 

is based. 

Please feel free to contact me should you have questions or require additional 

information. 

Sincerely, 

President, CEO 

C. H. Patrick & Company, Inc. 

1806 Perimeter Rd. Greenville, SC 29605, (800) 526-2793, Fax: (864) 277-8569
# C_2021206EN.01001401.xml

| 31.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Εfeteio Athinon (Greece) lodged on 3 March 2021 — VP, CX, RG, TR and Others v Elliniko Dimosio

(Case C-133/21)

(2021/C 206/18)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Εfeteio Athinon

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: VP, CX, RG, TR and Others

Respondent: Elliniko Dimosio

Questions referred

Is national legislation, such as that at issue, which imposes different treatment for wage purposes on workers with fixed-term contracts within the meaning of clause 1 of Directive 1999/70/EC

Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP. (1) In particular, is national legislation under which different treatment of workers for wage purposes is justified on the ground that they provided their work under fixed-term contracts in the knowledge that they were covering fixed and permanent needs of the employer compatible with clause 4 of Directive 1999/70/EC?

---

(1)  as compared to the comparable permanent worker, on the basis of the sole criterion of differentiation that their contracts are classified by their employer or by law as fixed-term contracts for work, compatible with clause 4 of Directive 1999/70/EC?

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViroPharma Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Vincent J. Milano                                                
|Vincent J. Milano President
and Chief Executive Officer July 28, 2010
|                                                                     
|/s/ Charles A. Rowland, Jr.                                          
|Charles A. Rowland, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer July 28,
2010
State of California

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

EXECUTIVE ORDER R-10-002

Relating to the Adoption of the Amendments to New P assenger Motor Vehicle

Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards

WHEREAS, on September 24, 2009, the Air Resources B oard (ARB or Board) conducted a public hearing to consider proposed ame ndments to new passenger motor vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards, as set f orth in the Initial Statement of Reasons, which was released to the public on August 6, 2009;

WHEREAS, following the public hearing on September 24, 2009, the Board adopted Resolution 09-53, in which the Board approved of th e proposed amendments to California Code of Regulations (CCR), title 13, sec tions 1961 and 1961.1, and to the

“California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Pro cedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium -Duty Vehicles” incorporated by reference in CCR, title 13, section 1961(d) (as las t amended May 2, 2008), as set forth in Attachments A and B, and modified by Attachments C and D thereto;

WHEREAS, Resolution 09-53 directed the Executive Of ficer to take final action to adopt the regulatory amendments set forth in Attachments A, B, C, and D to Resolution 09-53, with such other conforming modifi cations as may be appropriate, to make the modified regulatory language and any addit ional supporting documents and information available to the public for a period of at least 15 days, to consider such written comments as may be submitted during this pe riod, and to make such modifications as may be appropriate in light of the comments received, or to present the regulatory amendments to the Board for further cons ideration if he determines that this is warranted after review of the comments;

WHEREAS, on November 24, 2009, the modified regulat ions, reflecting the amendments approved by the Board and other changes made to best reflect the intent of the Board at the hearing, and additional documen t, were made available for public comment for a period of at least 15 days, with the changes to the originally proposed text clearly indicated, in accordance with the prov isions of title 1, California Code of Regulations, section 44; and

WHEREAS, a number of written comments were received during the supplemental 15-day comment period and those comments, as well a s the comments received during the initial 45-day comment period, have been consid ered by the Executive Officer.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recitals and findings contained in

Resolution 09-53 and the Final Statement of Reasons are incorporated by reference

herein.Executive Order R-10-002 -2-

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that sections 1961 and 1961.1 , title 13, CCR, are hereby amended as set forth in Attachment 1 hereto, and th e California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subseque nt Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles are her eby amended as set forth in

Attachment 2 hereto.

Executed this 22 day of February , 2010, at Sacramento, California.

/s/

_____________________ James N. Goldstene

Executive Officer

Attachment
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000754590
<NAME>                          TM Century, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                     1
<CURRENCY>                                              US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                  1
<CASH>                                                      422339
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               789507
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 95510
<INVENTORY>                                                 448293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           1930809
<PP&E>                                                     2730584
<DEPRECIATION>                                             2263000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             2876038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       342949
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     29705
<OTHER-SE>                                                 2332978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               2876038
<SALES>                                                    6904492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           6904492
<CGS>                                                      1918907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              6408191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             945250
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         945250
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                945250
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.38



</TABLE>
260 La. 699

#### Robert James HART v. Dick RICHARDSON, Wood Scales, Inc., et al.

No. 52084.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 11, 1972.

In re: Robert James Hart applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Washington. 255 So.2d 435.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Masakazu Kurushima, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 27, 2006



By:

/s/ Masakazu KurushimaMasakazu Kurushima, President and Chief Executive
Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Frank RECASNER v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53140.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 1, 1973.

In re: Frank Recasner applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction. The record of the trial court shows the plea of guilty was free and voluntary.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion this writ must be granted since the relator did not have his constitutional rights explained to him before the plea was received. The plea was taken after Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 and the complete transcript of the plea colloquy negates compliance with Boykin.

TATE, J.,

concurs in the denial on the basis of State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La. 315, 259 So.2d 557 (1972).

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., dissent from the refusal.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                       (All dollar amounts in thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Year Ended December 31,
                                                               -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                                2000          1999         1998         1997         1996
                                                               ------        ------       ------       ------       ------
<S>                                                            <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Income before income taxes.............................        56,138        77,027       26,816       44,316       67,725
Fixed charges..........................................        19,837        17,861       19,645       16,642       12,578
Amortization of capitalized interest...................           534           686          609          409          198
Capitalized interest...................................          (300)         (588)      (1,940)      (1,952)      (1,667)
                                                               ------        ------       ------       ------       ------
  Earnings.............................................        76,209        94,986       45,130       59,415       78,834
                                                               ------        ------       ------       ------       ------
Imputed interest relating to rental expense............           460           470          169           83           58
Interest expense.......................................        19,377        17,391       19,476       16,559       12,520
                                                               ------        ------       ------       ------       ------
  Fixed charges........................................        19,837        17,861       19,645       16,642       12,578
                                                               ------        ------       ------       ------       ------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.....................           3.8           5.3          2.3          3.6          6.3
</TABLE>

                                       1