alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

                      USA DETERGENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  Appendix A to Item 601(c) of Regulation S-K
                       Three Months ended March 31, 1999
                     (in thousands, except per share data)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,055
<SECURITIES>                                     2,002
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,064
<INVENTORY>                                     14,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,728
<PP&E>                                          60,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,836
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,168
<SALES>                                         59,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,390
<CGS>                                           39,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                        58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,166
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     64
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and statement of earnings of Gerber Scientific, Inc
as of and for the nine-month period ended January 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statemments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,668
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     67,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,700
<PP&E>                                         107,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 310,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,150
<OTHER-SE>                                     211,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   310,307
<SALES>                                         86,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,884
<CGS>                                           47,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,558)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF HOLLY HILL, a municipal corporation, for the Use and Benefit of L & M PAVING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. O-127.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 22, 1971.

Fred J. Woods, Jr., of Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf & Barkin, Tampa, for appellant.

Leon G. Van Wert, Daytona Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed herein is affirmed on the authority of the decision rendered by the court in the case of United Bonding Insurance Company v. City of Holly Hill, 249 So.2d 720.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Mary G. Merritt, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Preferred Voice, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b. evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):



a. all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and



b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Mary G. Merritt          
|Mary G. Merritt              
|Vice President Finance       
|(Principal Financial Officer)
|November 12, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The data reported in this exhibit are based on unaudited statements but include
all adjustments which the company considers necessary for a fair presentation of
results for this period.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000041499
<NAME> THE GILLETTE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             63,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,320,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       58,000
<INVENTORY>                                     1,784,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5,242,000
<PP&E>                                          5,621,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,203,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,583,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,053,000
<BONDS>                                         3,259,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        88,000
<COMMON>                                        1,362,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,126,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,583,000
<SALES>                                         4,353,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,353,000
<CGS>                                           1,605,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,605,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,809,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 52,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   871,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      302,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               569,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      569,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .50


</TABLE>
#### Paul Jansen, Appellant Respondent, *v.*Fred P. Schneider, Respondent Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October, 1912.)

Contracts — severability — instruction in aviation.

A contract for instruction in aviation, pursuant to which plaintiff was to pay $150 in advance and $100 after he had received lessons and was able to fly, is entire and cannot be separated and apportioned.

Cross' appeals from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Few York.

Leonard McGee, for appellant Jansen.

Charles P. Halloek, for appellant Schneider.

*Per Curiami.*

Plaintiff on June fourth made an agreement with defendant for instruction in aviation for which defendant was to be paid $250 for teaching plaintiff to fly. Plaintiff paid this $150 in advance, the remaining $100 to be payable after the plaintiff had received the lessons and' was able to .fly.

Plaintiff was first sent to the shop to see the construction of the machine and learn how to assemble the parts, where he worked from-June seventh to June fifteenth. On June *49fifteenth plaintiff was told, there was no work for him there, and plaintiff went home to wait for lessons in the field. After that plaintiff went to defendant’s place at Belmont Park and saw defendant’s mechanic, hut got no instruction. Plaintiff reported daily .until June thirtieth, without receiving any lesson. The machine was then taken apart to be moved to Nassau Boulevard where plaintiff went early in July. But no opportunity was given him to use the machine which was not even put together. After making-demands, the Legal Aid Society was appealed to and wrote the defendant on plaintiff’s behalf. On August fourth the defendant replied:

“ If Hr. Jansen will call at my school at Nassau Boulevard, he will receive his lessons at once.”

Plaintiff, however, did call, but received only one practical lesson in the biplane on August sixteenth, when- in about a minute a screw dropped out, so that the machine had to be stopped.

Other demands were repeated and disregarded until, on August twenty-third, plaintiff notified the defendant that, as he was not getting instruction, he would not come again, followed by this suit for the return of his payment of $150.

The trial court gave the plaintiff judgment for seventy-five dollars and costs, from which both sides have appealed.

The evidence indicates such indifference and neglect by defendant (especially after his written promise on August-fourth that plaintiff should receive his lessons “at once”), that the court was justified in finding that defendant had broken his contract. The work in the shop was a preliminary, but the defendant’s contract was entire, and cannot be separated and apportioned. Starr v. Liftchild, 40 Barb. 541; Kabus v. Seftner, 34 Misc. Rep. 538.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Present: Grane, Putnam and Aspinall, JJ.

Judgment reversed.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        - News Releases

#  News Releases 

**Collected by:** U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 

**Archived since:**Sep, 2013

**Description:**
This collection includes HHS news and announcements from 1991+.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Science & Health

**Creator:**    	    OS/ASPA

    Enter a search term on the right to search the text within the archived pages. Or for more search options, use the Advanced Search options below.    

Capture date range:

 Help with Search

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Search Page Text

Please enter terms above to search for archived content.

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
Confidential Business Information 

Combustors 

BURNER HEIGHT: 4-7 FEET AGS 

EFF RELEASE HEIGHT: 25 FEET AGS 

4.46E+04 kJ/Kg 

32",36" and 48" 

HEAT OF COMBUSTION: 

EFF STACK DIAMETER: 

EFF EXIT TEMPERATURE: 400·800 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) 

EFF EXIT VELOCITY: .1-.9 m/s 

Burner Temperature 1000-1300 degrees Fahrenheit (OF)

Tank Flares 

BURNER HEIGHT: - 9-12 FEET AGS 

EFF RELEASE HEIGHT: 12-17 FEET AGS 

HEAT OF COMBUSTION: 4.46E+04 kJ/Kg 

EFF STACK DIAMETER: .0762 m 

EFF EXIT TEMPERATURE: 400-800 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) 

EFF EXIT VELOCITY: 10-400 feet/s 

I 

Treater Flares 

BURNER HEIGHT: 9-12 FEET AGS 

EFF RELEASE HEIGHT: 12-17 FEET AGS 

HEAT OF COMBUSTION: 4.46E+04 kJ/Kg 

.0762 m 

400-800 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) 

EFF STACK DIAMETER:

-_.­ - EFF EXIT TEMPERATURE: 

__·w." 

EFF EXIT VELOCITY: 125-400 feet/s 

BURNER HEIGHT: 7-12 FEET AGS 

EFF RELEASE HEIGHT: 25 FEET AGS 

4.46E+04 kJ/Kg 

4" 

400-800 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) 

HEAT OF COMBUSTION: 

EFF STACK DIAMETER: 

EFF EXIT TEMPERATURE: 

EFF EXIT VELOCITY: 12-40 feet/s 

Treater Burner 

--.-.-------------------­

Confidential Business Information 

..
RE: Bakken Flare data
 

Skiba, Rebecca K. (MRO)
 

to:
 

Eric Wortman
 

07/24/2012 12:21 PM
 

Hide Details
 

From: "Skiba, Rebecca K. (MRO)" <rkskiba@marathonoil.com>
 

To: Eric Wortman/R8/USEPA/US@EPA,
 

Eric,
 

With the caveat that the data you were provided was averaged and not site-specific for any particular Marathon
 

sites, we withdraw our claim of Confidential Business Information with regard to this data.
 

Thanks,
 

Rebecca
 

From: Eric Wortman [mailto:Wortman.Eric@epamail.epa.90v]
 

Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 11:55 AM
 

To: Skiba, Rebecca K. (MRO)
 

Subject: Fw: Bakken Flare data
 

Hello Rebecca,
 

Below is the email I referenced in our phone conversation. As we discussed, I would like to reference the
 

enclosed combustor and utility flare specifications in the air quality impact analysis discussions for an AQIA
 

memo-to-file and technical support document for the Ft. Berthold FIP, specifically the height and exit temperature.
 

Is Marathon able to withdraw the confidentiality claim on this document so that the specifications can be used in
 

the AQIA discussions and a copy of the document can be included in the docket for the rule?
 

Please call me if you have any questions,
 

Eric
 

Eric Wortman
 

Environmental Scientist
 

Air Permitting, Monitoring and Modeling Unit
 

Office of Partnerships & Regulatory Assistance
 

EPA Region 8
 

1595 Wynkoop Street (8P-AR)
 

Denver, CO 80202-1129
 

Phone: (303) 312-6649
 

Fax: (303) 312-6064
 , . 0
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7161

GEORGE W. KELLY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN CARMICHAEL; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-3660-6-20AK)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George W. Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George W. Kelly seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Kelly v. Carmichael, No. CA-97-3660-6-20AK

(E.D.N.C. June 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2022207EN.01003802.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — PO v Commission

(Case T-36/21) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/338/17 - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Article 1d(1) and (4) of the Staff Regulations - Reasonable accommodation - Principle of non-discrimination on the ground of disability - Directive 2000/78/EC - Obligation to state reasons - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Responsibility - Material and non-material damage)

(2022/C 207/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PO (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the competition selection board of 29 April 2020, taken following a review, not to include his name on the reserve list for Open Competition EPSO/AD/338/17 as well as the decision of the appointing authority of 14 October 2020 rejecting his complaint and, second, compensation for the harm he allegedly suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 110, 29.3.2021.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Gerber Scientific, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  December 10, 2004



| | /s/ Marc T. Giles                     | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | Marc T. Giles
Chief Executive Officer | 



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.