alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Medizone International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve Hanni, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Steve Hanni Steve Hanni, Principal Financial Officer  Date: July 23, 2008  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**OfficerCertification under 18 USC 1350**

 

 

We, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of AXS-One Inc. (the “issuer”),do hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the issuer.

 

 
|                                          | AXS-ONE INC. |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------|
|                                          |         |
|                                          |         |
| **Date:   **November  12, 2004 | By:          | /s/ William P. Lyons |   |
|                                          |         | William P. Lyons  Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                                          |         |   |
|                                          |         |   |
|                                          | By:          | /s/ William G. Levering  III |   |
|                                          |         |  William G.  Levering III |
|                                          |         |  Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer, |
|                                          |         |  and Treasurer |
|                                               |              |  |  |  |

 

1

----
H. Res. 734 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 18, 2014. 

Whereas James Foley and Steven Sotloff were highly respected journalists whose integrity and dedication were a 

credit to their profession; 

Whereas James Foley and Steven Sotloff embodied the spirit 

of our Nation’s First Amendment liberties, including the 

freedom of the press; 

Whereas James Foley and Steven Sotloff made significant 

contributions to our Nation through their courageous reporting of events in Libya, Syria, and elsewhere; and 

Whereas the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is 

a terrorist organization responsible for committing barbaric acts against United States citizens, religious and 

ethnic minorities, and those who do not subscribe to 

ISIL’s depraved, violent, and oppressive ideology: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) strongly condemns the terrorist acts of ISIL, including the barbaric and deplorable murders of James 

Foley and Steven Sotloff; 

(2) salutes James Foley and Steven Sotloff for their 

unwavering and courageous pursuit of journalistic excel-
2 

•HRES 734 EH 

lence under the most difficult and dangerous of conditions; 

(3) mourns the deaths of James Foley and Steven 

Sotloff; and 

(4) offers condolences to the families, friends, and 

loved ones of James Foley and Steven Sotloff. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7626

TYRONE CURRENCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOUGLAS STROUT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-98-619-5-H)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Currence, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Currence, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. See Currence v. Strout,

No. CA-98-619-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.1****Certifications**I, Dennis R. Wolters, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Day International Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2005 By:  /s/ Dennis R Wolters    Dennis R. Wolters    President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph C. Sienkiewicz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Royce Biomedical,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 17, 2005                             /s/ Joseph C. Sienkiewicz
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Joseph C. Sienkiewicz
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C §1350)



I, Lori A. Jones, of Analytical Surveys, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2003 (the
Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Analytical Surveys, Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: May 17, 2004    
|                       
|/s/ Lori A. Jones      
|Lori A. Jones          
|Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021338EN.01001402.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 9 June 2021 — Tilman SA v Unilever Supply Chain Company AG

(Case C-358/21)

(2021/C 338/18)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: Tilman SA

Respondent in cassation: Unilever Supply Chain Company AG

Question referred

Are the requirements under Article 23(1)(a) and (2) of the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, signed in Lugano on 30 October 2007, satisfied where a clause conferring jurisdiction is contained in general terms and conditions to which a contract concluded in writing refers by providing the hypertext link to a website, access to which allows those general terms and conditions to be viewed, downloaded and printed, without the party against whom that clause is enforced having been asked to accept those general terms and conditions by ticking a box on that website?

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,386,472               8,782,019
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,376,027              14,606,483
<PP&E>                                         565,463               1,548,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                 188,904                 220,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,644,198              73,410,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,233,955               2,113,337
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       42,046,807              54,473,947
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       233,564                 207,975
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,129,872              15,869,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,644,198              73,410,583
<SALES>                                     62,674,149              46,037,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,926,171              46,535,329
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,539,016              36,078,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               506,478                  98,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,508,967               1,105,616
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,940                 161,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,342,359)             (6,505,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (746,063)               (795,281)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,596,296)             (5,710,230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,596,296)             (5,710,230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18                  (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14                       0
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ISAIH VEYTIA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50027

D.C. No. 3:09-cr-03145-JLS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Isaih Veytia appeals from the 96-month sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952,

960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

JAN 05 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50027

Veytia contends that, when imposing a sentence below the statutory

mandatory minimum, the district court erred by determining that the government’s

substantial assistance motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) permitted it to consider

only the factors set forth in section 3553(e) and not the factors set forth in 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a). Veytia contends that this determination conflicts with

Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007), and leads to a sentence that

violates the parsimony principle. These contentions are foreclosed. See United

States v. Jackson, 577 F.3d 1032, 1035-36 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors of Newhall Management Corporation and Partners of The
  Newhall Land and Farming Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Numbers 033-53767, 033-53769, 033-58171 and 333-15303) of The Newhall Land
and Farming Company of our report dated January 21, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of The Newhall Land and Farming Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears
in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of The Newhall Land and
Farming Company.


                                        /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 18, 1998
#### The State vs. Herrington.

Vulgar language, however offensive, does not justify an assault and battery, though it may be considered by the jury in mitigation of the fine.

*Appeal from Cranford Circuit Court.*

Hon. John M. Wilson, .Circuit Judge.

Mr. Attorney General Hóllowell, for the State.

Mr. Justice Compton

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendant, *Herrington,*was indicted in the Crawford Circuit Court for an assault and battery upon one *West.*

*196At the trial the defendant was acquitted, and the case comes before us on exceptions taken to the decision of the court overruling the State’s motion for a new trial.

The only question presented for our determination is, whether the verdict of the jury was warranted by the testimony.

It appears that *West,*the party injured, in a spirit of jest, indulged in pranks and vulgar language, which were offensive and annoying to the defendant, who, in consequence thereof, became exasperated, and inflicted a severe blow upon *West*with an iron wedge.

Although the language and deportment of *West,*as stated in the bill of exceptions, were in the highest degree reprehensible, and well calculated to provoke violence on the part of the defendant, who was quite an old man. yet they did not justify an assault, and could only be considered by the jury in mitigation of the fine.

There being no evidence whatever, as appears by the record, to support the finding of the jury, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
# C_2022119EN.01003702.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2022 — Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann v EUIPO — Cirillo (POMODORO)

(Case T-76/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark POMODORO - Genuine use of the trade mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Statement setting out the grounds of appeal - Period for lodging - Article 58(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 - Proof of genuine use)

(2022/C 119/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR (Tübingen, Germany) (represented by: H. Hillers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Francesco Cirillo (Berlin, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 November 2020 (Case R 715/2020-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann and Mr Cirillo.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the proceedings before the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 110, 29.3.2021.

---