Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          Enter the terms you wish to search for.
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              FOIA (Freedom of Information Act)
                              The Privacy Act
                              HHS Computer Matching Agreements (CMAs)
                              2020 HHS Annual Computer Matching Report
 Navigate to:
  Freedom of Information Act
                                            
            
            Submit & Check Status of FOIA Requests
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      FOIA Contacts & Requester Service Centers and Privacy Act Contacts
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      HHS FOIA Reports
                          
            
            Annual Reports
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Quarterly Reports
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Chief FOIA Officer Report
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Open Pending FOIA Request Reports
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      FOIA Library / Electronic Reading Room
                          
            
            2016/2017 HHS Presidential Transition Documents
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      FOIA Exemptions & Exclusions
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      FOIA & Privacy Act Statutes & Resources
                          
            
            The Privacy Act
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      HHS System of Records Notices (SORNs)
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      HHS Computer Matching Agreements (CMAs)
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      FOIA FAQS
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      FOIA Appeals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      FOIA Fees
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      COVID-19 ContractsText resize icon

                    




2020 HHS Annual Computer Matching Report








  
  
    

  
      





A.  Current Composition of the HHS Data Integrity Board (DIB)

**Names and positions of the members of the DIB**

	Cheryl Campbell, Acting Chairperson and Voting Member, Acting Assistant Secretary for Administration
		Carol Maloney, Mandatory Voting Member, Executive Officer/Deputy Agency Chief FOIA Officer/Privacy Act SAOP
		Christi A. Grimm, Mandatory Voting Member, Principal Deputy Inspector General
		Martha C. Craig, Non-voting Advisory Member, Assistant Deputy Associate General Counsel
	**Name and Contact Information of the DIB Secretary**
	Jacqlyn Smith-Simpson
	200 Independence Ave., SW
	Washington, D.C. 20201
	Jacqlyn.Smith-Simpson@hhs.gov, (202) 795-7648
	**Any Changes in Membership or Structure of the DIB**
	N/A

B.  Matching Agreements HHS Entered Into in 2020

CMA HHS #2001
	**Participant Agencies:** HHS’ Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) is the source agency, and each State Agency Administering the Unemployment Compensation Program (also referred to as State Workforce Agency or “SWA”) is the non-federal/recipient agency.**Title:** “Verification of Unemployment Compensation (UC) Program Eligibility”**Description:** This matching program assists each SWA in administering the Unemployment Compensation (UC) benefits program, by providing it with new hire and quarterly wage information from OCSE’s National Directory of New Hires (NDNH) about UC benefit applicants and recipients, to use to establish or verify the individuals’ eligibility for UC benefits and continuing compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements of the UC program.**Link posted in the Agency’s website:**https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/acf-uc-cma-2001.pdf  **Please provide an account of whether the agency has fully adhered to the terms of the matching agreement.**Yes.**Please provide an account of whether all disclosures of agency records for use in the matching program continue to be justified.**All disclosures continue to be justified, based on the last cost benefit analysis (CBA) prepared, described below.**Please indicate whether a cost-benefit analysis was performed, the results of the cost-benefit analysis, and an explanation of why the agency proceeded with any matching program for which the results of the cost-benefit analysis did not demonstrate that the program is likely to be cost effective.**A CBA was conducted by the Department of Labor (DOL), which oversees the UC program, based on data provided by 51 of the 53 participating SWAs. The CBA demonstrates that, in FY 2018, the combined cost for all the SWAs to participate in the matching program was $1.9 million and that, due to use of NDNH data, SWAs collectively reported $53.6 million in established overpayments and $48.4 million in overpayments prevented and recovered.CMA HHS #2002
	**Participant Agencies:** HHS’ Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) is the source agency, and State Agency Administering the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program is the non-federal/recipient agency.**Title:** “Verification of State Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program (TANF) Eligibility”**Description:** This matching program assists each state agency in administering the TANF program, by providing the state agency with new hire, quarterly wage, and unemployment insurance information from OCSE’s National Directory of New Hires (NDNH) pertaining to individuals who are adult applicants for, or recipients of, assistance under the TANF program.  The state agency uses the NDNH data to establish or verify the individuals’ eligibility for TANF benefits, reduce payment errors, and maintain program integrity. The state agency may also use the NDNH information for updating the individuals’ reported participation in work activities and updating contact information maintained by the state agency about the individuals and their employers.**Link posted in the Agency’s website:**https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/acf-tanf-cma-2002.pdf**Please provide an account of whether the agency has fully adhered to the terms of the matching agreement.** Yes.  **Please provide an account of whether all disclosures of agency records for use in the matching program continue to be justified.** All disclosures continue to be justified, based on the last cost benefit analysis (CBA) prepared, described below.  **Please indicate whether a cost-benefit analysis was performed, the results of the cost-benefit analysis, and an explanation of why the agency proceeded with any matching program for which the results of the cost-benefit analysis did not demonstrate that the program is likely to be cost effective.** ACF’s Office of Family Assistance (OFA), which oversees the TANF program, provided performance outcomes derived from data provided by six of the eight state agencies participating in the matching program in FY 2018, which was used in performing a CBA. The CBA demonstrates that, in FY 2018, the combined cost for all eight state agencies to participate in the matching program was $241,863, but that they collectively avoided approximately $1,058,525 in improper payments to TANF recipients with previously unknown earnings.CMA HHS #2003
	**Participant Agencies:** HHS’ Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) is the source agency, and Social Security Administration (SSA) is the recipient agency.**Title:** "Verification of Eligibility for Extra Help (Low Income Subsidy) Under the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program"**Description:**This matching program assists SSA in administering the Extra Help program, by providing SSA with quarterly wage (QW) and unemployment insurance (UI) information from OCSE’s National Directory of New Hires (NDNH) about individuals who apply for or are receiving low-income subsidy assistance (extra help) under the Medicare Part D prescription drug program. SSA uses the NDNH information in determining the individuals’ eligibility for the extra help.**Link posted in the Agency’s website:**https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/acf-ssa-cma-2003.pdf  ******Please provide an account of whether the agency has fully adhered to the terms of the matching agreement.**Yes. **Please provide an account of whether all disclosures of agency records for use in the matching program continue to be justified.**All disclosures continue to be justified, based on costs SSA saves by using the matching program (an automated process) instead of a manual process to obtain the NDNH data (see below).**Please indicate whether a cost-benefit analysis was performed, the results of the cost-benefit analysis, and an explanation of why the agency proceeded with any matching program for which the results of the cost-benefit analysis did not demonstrate that the program is likely to be cost effective.**SSA performed a CBA for this agreement, based on FY 2018 data, which does not include any avoided or recovered improper payments as benefits to offset against the estimated $903,500 cost of conducting the matching program, so does not demonstrate that the matching program is likely to be cost effective. The HHS Data Integrity Board (DIB) approved the matching program based other supporting justifications stated in the CBA, i.e., $15,909,954 in cost savings to SSA from using the matching program (an automated process) instead of a more costly manual process to obtain the NDNH data.CMA HHS #2004
	**Participant Agencies:** HHS’ Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is the source agency, and the Department of Treasury’s Bureau of Fiscal Services is the recipient agency.**Title:** “Do Not Pay Initiative”**Description:** This matching program provides CMS with information from Treasury’s Do Not Pay Working System to assist CMS in identifying providers and suppliers who are ineligible to be enrolled in and bill Medicare, and should not be entrusted with patient care, because they are reflected in Treasury’s Do Not Pay Working System as ineligible to receive federal payments and awards..  The results of the matching program enable CMS to promptly suspend or revoke disqualified providers’ and suppliers’ Medicare billing privileges, avoid or recover improper payments made to them, and enhance patient safety.**Link posted in the Agency’s website:**https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cms-irs-do-not-pay-cma-2004-508.pdf   **Please provide an account of whether the agency has fully adhered to the terms of the matching agreement.**Yes. **Please provide an account of whether all disclosures of agency records for use in the matching program continue to be justified.**All disclosures continue to be justified, based on the monetary and non-monetary benefits of conducting the program, described below.**Please indicate whether a cost-benefit analysis was performed, the results of the cost-benefit analysis, and an explanation of why the agency proceeded with any matching program for which the results of the cost-benefit analysis did not demonstrate that the program is likely to be cost effective.**
	A CBA was performed, which does not quantify amounts of improper payments avoided or recovered to offset the costs of conducting the matching program, so does not demonstrate that the matching program is likely to be cost effective.  However, the CBA describes the following benefits that justify conducting the matching program:
	**Monetary Benefits:**
		Using Treasury’s Do Not Pay Working system under a single matching agreement with Fiscal Service avoids the need to manually compare files or to execute separate matching agreements with multiple agencies. CMS’ costs to detect disqualified providers and suppliers using those alternative methods would be significantly greater than the costs of conducting this matching program; those significantly greater costs are avoided by the matching program.
		The matching program enables CMS to detect unqualified providers and suppliers and suspend or revoke their Medicare billing privileges sooner than would be possible using alternative methods. This not only avoids future payments that would be improper, but reduces the incidence of malpractice cases and those attendant costs.
		**Non-Monetary Benefits:**
		Non-monetary benefits are of greater importance to the CMS mission, and include increased patient safety, reduced reputational risk, and prevention of malpractice. Patient safety is of utmost importance to the CMS mission and its importance cannot be measured in dollars.CMA HHS #2007
	**Participant Agencies:** HHS’ Administration for Children and Families (ACF) is the source agency, and Social Security Administration (SSA) is the recipient agency.**Title:** “Title II-Office of Child Support Enforcement Quarterly Match”**Description:** This matching program assists SSA in administering the Title II Disability Insurance (DI) program, by providing SSA with quarterly wage data (and, if legally required, unemployment insurance data) about DI applicants and recipients (clients), from OCSE’s National Directory of New Hires (NDNH). SSA uses the data to identify clients who are working and earning wages, so that SSA can make correct DI entitlement determinations, calculate correct DI payment amounts, and avoid and recover DI overpayments.**Link posted in the Agency’s website:** https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/acf-ssa-cma-2007.pdf   **Please provide an account of whether the agency has fully adhered to the terms of the matching agreement.**Yes.**Please provide an account of whether all disclosures of agency records for use in the matching program continue to be justified.**All disclosures continue to be justified, based on the last cost benefit analysis (CBA) prepared, described below.**Please indicate whether a cost-benefit analysis was performed, the results of the cost-benefit analysis, and an explanation of why the agency proceeded with any matching program for which the results of the cost-benefit analysis did not demonstrate that the program is likely to be cost effective.**
	SSA performed a cost-benefit analysis which demonstrates,  $19,155,311 in costs and $240,775,680 in avoided overpayments for 42,157 cases measured in FY 2018, of which 264 cases were determined to have an overpayment which would have continued undetected for eight months without the matching program, resulting in a favorable benefit-to-cost ratio of 12.6:1.CMA HHS #2008
	**Participant Agencies:** HHS’ Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is the recipient agency, and the Social Security Administration (SSA) is the source agency.**Title:** "Determining Enrollment or Eligibility for Insurance Affordability Programs Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act"**Description:** This matching program enables CMS to compare Health Insurance Exchanges (HIX) Program data about Qualified Health Plan applicants and enrollees (and other individuals seeking eligibility determinations through the Exchanges) to SSA data, to confirm the individuals’ 1) identity and citizenship, 2) status as deceased or imprisoned, and 3) Title II disability benefit quarters of coverage and monthly and annual income, for the purpose of determining the individuals’ eligibility to enroll in a Qualified Health Plan through an Exchange established under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and eligibility for Insurance Affordability Programs and  certifications of exemption from the shared responsibility payment; and for the purpose of making eligibility redeterminations and renewal decisions, including appeal determinations.**Link posted in the Agency’s website:** https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cms-ssa-cma-2008.pdf**Please provide an account of whether the agency has fully adhered to the terms of the matching agreement.**Yes. **Please provide an account of whether all disclosures of agency records for use in the matching program continue to be justified.**All disclosures continue to be justified, as non-discretionary under the PPACA (i.e., as necessary in order to provide a single, streamlined application process that will maximizes enrollments in Qualified Health Plans under the PPACA). **Please indicate whether a cost-benefit analysis was performed, the results of the cost-benefit analysis, and an explanation of why the agency proceeded with any matching program for which the results of the cost-benefit analysis did not demonstrate that the program is likely to be cost effective.**A CBA was prepared which covers all eight PPACA Marketplace matching programs. The CBA reflects that the matching programs do not avoid or recover improper payments with which to recoup the cost to conduct them, so does not demonstrate that the matching programs are likely to be cost effective. The CBA demonstrates a total estimated cost of approximately $39 million for agencies to conduct the eight Marketplace matching programs, and describes the following justifications:

	Because the PPACA mandated a single, streamlined application process, the matching programs are not discretionary but must be conducted even if not cost-effective to conduct.
		The existing matching structure, which is a choice, continues to be effective in providing accurate determinations and maximizing enrollments and continues to be less costly than an alternative structure that CMS could have adopted (which would have required each AE to enter into separate matching agreements with each source agency).
		Maximizing enrollments in qualified health plans results in coverage which (depending on usage) provides cost savings for enrollees (consumers) that outweigh their cost to apply for and maintain the coverage.CMA HHS #2010
	**Participant Agencies:** HHS’ Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is the recipient agency, and the Department of Homeland Security’s United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the source agency.**Title:** "Verification of United States Citizenship and Immigration Status Data for Eligibility Determinations"**Description:** This matching program provides CMS’ Health Insurance Exchanges (HIX) Program with immigrant, nonimmigrant, and naturalized or derived citizen status information from USCIS’s SAVE program about Qualified Health Plan applicants and enrollees (and other individuals seeking eligibility determinations through the Exchanges), for the purpose of  assisting CMS and State Administering Entities in determining the individuals’ eligibility to enroll in a Qualified Health Plan through an Exchange established under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) or eligibility for Insurance Affordability Program or for one or more exemptions.**Link posted in the Agency’s website:** https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cms-cma-2010.pdf**Please provide an account of whether the agency has fully adhered to the terms of the matching agreement.**Yes. **Please provide an account of whether all disclosures of agency records for use in the matching program continue to be justified.**All disclosures continue to be justified, as non-discretionary under the PPACA (i.e., as necessary in order to provide a single, streamlined application process that will maximizes enrollments in Qualified Health Plans under the PPACA). **Please indicate whether a cost-benefit analysis was performed, the results of the cost-benefit analysis, and an explanation of why the agency proceeded with any matching program for which the results of the cost-benefit analysis did not demonstrate that the program is likely to be cost effective.**A CBA was prepared which covers all eight PPACA Marketplace matching programs. The CBA reflects that the matching programs do not avoid or recover improper payments with which to recoup the cost to conduct them, so does not demonstrate that the matching programs are likely to be cost effective. The CBA demonstrates a total estimated cost of approximately $39 million for agencies to conduct the eight Marketplace matching programs, and describes the following justifications:

	Because the PPACA mandated a single, streamlined application process, the matching programs are not discretionary but must be conducted even if not cost-effective to conduct.
		The existing matching structure, which is a choice, continues to be effective in providing accurate determinations and maximizing enrollments and continues to be less costly than an alternative structure that CMS could have adopted (which would have required each AE to enter into separate matching agreements with each source agency).
		Maximizing enrollments in qualified health plans results in coverage which (depending on usage) provides cost savings for enrollees (consumers) that outweigh their cost to apply for and maintain the coverage.C.  Programs Where Cost/Benefit Analysis was waived

N/A

D.  Matching Agreements the DIB Disapproved

N/A

E.  Any Violations of Matching Agreements that Have Been Alleged or Identified

Yes.  The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has identified one violation that involved the continuation of matching activities following the expiration of the matching agreement.  Upon identification of the violation, the relevant HHS component immediately ceased matching activities with the participating agency.  Corrective action to re-establish the following lapsed matching agreement is underway and expected to be completed later this year.  Discussions between the participating agencies about other appropriate remedial actions are ongoing.

CMA HHS #1603 (Expired 10/1/2018)
	**Participant Agencies:** HHS’ Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is the source agency, and the Department of Defense/Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) is the recipient agency.**Title:** "Disclosure of Enrollment and Eligibility Information for Military Health System Beneficiaries Who are Medicare Eligible"**Description:** This matching program enables the DMDC to identify Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries who are eligible for TRICARE and become entitled to enroll in Medicare Part A and aren’t enrolled in Medicare Part B (to switch them from TRICARE to Medicare Part A) and individuals who are eligible for and have opted to be covered under Medicare Part B (i.e., to use Part B as primary payer and TRICARE as secondary payer), so that DMDC can comply with a statutory mandate to discontinue MHS benefits to beneficiaries who become eligible for Medicare Part A unless they enroll in Medicare Part B.

                    
  


Content created by Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Division Content last reviewed December 13, 2021 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​