alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1044 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1044

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the area of the 
World War II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or 
  an inscription with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt 
         prayed with the United States on D-Day, June 6, 1944.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``World War II Memorial Prayer Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF PLAQUE OR INSCRIPTION AT WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior--
            (1) shall install in the area of the World War II Memorial 
        in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or an inscription 
        with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed with 
        the United States on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day;
            (2) shall design, procure, prepare, and install the plaque 
        or inscription referred to in paragraph (1); and
            (3) may not use Federal funds to prepare or install the 
        plaque or inscription referred to in paragraph (1), but may 
        accept and expend private contributions for this purpose.

SEC. 3. COMMEMORATIVE WORKS ACT.

    Chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the 
``Commemorative Works Act''), shall apply to the design and placement 
of the plaque within the area of the World War II Memorial.

            Passed the Senate June 5, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1044

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the area of the 
World War II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or 
  an inscription with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt 
         prayed with the United States on D-Day, June 6, 1944.
```
#### Lois E. FISHBACK, Appellant, v. Louis TOWNSEND, Appellee.

No. 72-906.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 26, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 15, 1973.

*428B. Lee Elam of Barrs, Melendi, Williamson & Burton, Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

EVANS, VERNON W., Jr., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from Final Judgment entered in favor of the Appellee in the Civil Court of Record in and for Hillsbor-ough County, Florida.

Appellant complains of error in the granting of a Motion to Strike a loss of use claim arising out of a motor vehicle accident. The record before this Court reflects that the Appellant brought suit for damage to her motor vehicle which was alleged to be a total loss. Appellant also claimed damages for loss of use during the period of time required for replacement. The Appellee’s Motion to Strike the loss of use claim was granted and that is the only ruling of the court below which is argued here.

The lower court found that Appellant had executed a release of all claims for a valuable consideration prior to the filing of her lawsuit and entered Final Judgment for Appellee, defendant below. In the light of this record it is apparent that the error, if any, complained of was harmless and the Judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

McNULTY, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
# C_2022222EN.01004002.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/40

---

Order of the General Court of 1 April 2022 — Classen Holz Kontor v EUIPO — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer (DRYTILE)

(Case T-307/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/66)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.

---
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Earnest COLLINS, Jr., Respondent.

No. 36370.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1967.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Edmund McDaniel & Pyle, Lake Alfred, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court in this case (Fla.App., 197 So.2d 574) is one of reversal. There appears, however, to be no majority opinion.

Petition for certiorari has been filed here alleging conflict with Roberts v. State, Fla., 164 So.2d 817; Grant v. State, Fla., 171 So.2d 361 and Male v. State, Fla.App., 189 So.2d 521, all relating to the admissibility of a confession.

In view of the reversal by the district court without a majority opinion setting forth the reasons therefor, request is respectfully made to the District Court of Appeal, Second District, that it prepare and adopt a majority opinion setting forth the theory and reasoning upon which the judgment of reversal is based. Jurisdiction of the cause is relinquished to that court temporarily for that purpose. When this has been accomplished, the cause shall be returned to this Court which will then proceed to determine whether or not sufficient conflict exists to require a further review here. See Solomon v. Sanitarians’ Registration Board, Fla., 147 So.2d 132; Sanitarians’ Registration Board v. Solomon, Fla.App., 148 So.2d 744, and Solomon v. Sanitarians’ Registration Board, Fla., 155 So.2d 353.

It is so ordered.

O’CONNELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before GASTON , HOUTZ , and MYERS Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Mat t hew D. BRAITHWAITE Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 20 21 00 242

Decided: 18 November 2021
Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge : Terrance J. Reese
Sentence adjudged 21 May 2021 by a general court

- martial convened at Camp Fuji, Iwakuni, Japan , consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 18 months , forfeiture of all pay and allowances
, and a bad

conduct discharge.
For Appellant: C

ommander Kyle Calvin Kneese , JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.United States v. Braithwaite , NMCCA No. 20 2 100 242 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________

PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materi ally prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JS/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICK SIEGEL, an individual,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ANGELA M. BRADSTREET, in her

official capacity as the Labor

Commissioner for the State of California,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 08-56991

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02480-CAS-SS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Rick Siegel appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

FILED

DEC 29 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JS/Research 2 08-56991

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for injunctive and declaratory relief against the California

Labor Commissioner. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Nat’l Ass’n for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis v. Cal. Bd. of

Psychology, 228 F.3d 1043, 1049 (9th Cir. 2000). We may affirm on any ground

supported by the record. Ove v. Gwinn, 264 F.3d 817, 821 (9th Cir. 2001). We

affirm.

The district court resolved Siegel’s claims on two grounds, one of which was

on the merits. We affirm on that ground for the reasons stated by the district court. 

To the extent Siegel’s equal protection claim is based on the differences between

the Talent Agencies Act and statutes regulating other occupational licenses, the

claim fails because there is a rational basis for the California legislature’s decision

to craft the Act differently from other licensing statutes. See Nat’l Ass’n for the

Advancement of Psychoanalysis, 228 F.3d at 1050-53 (rejecting equal protection

challenge to California licensing scheme under rational basis test and stating that

“[i]t simply is not the function of the courts to tell California how to craft its

legislation”).

Because Siegel does not state a claim under section 1983, his claim for

declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 fails. See Hoeck v. City of Portland, 57

F.3d 781, 787 (9th Cir. 1995).
JS/Research 3 08-56991

Siegel’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

We deny Siegel’s request for judicial notice, and we deny as moot his

motion to expedite this appeal.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         514,183
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,313,524
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 86,029,168
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      34,364,761
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        33,360,600
<LOANS>                                     91,635,785
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (347,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             227,399,623
<DEPOSITS>                                 117,583,183
<SHORT-TERM>                                17,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,644,263
<LONG-TERM>                                 44,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,675
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,800,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             227,399,623
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,735,641
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,575,338
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,310,979
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,034,163
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,843,903
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,467,076
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,618
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             139,718
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,484,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,182,634
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     950,633
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   950,633
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.06
<LOANS-NON>                                    451,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               345,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,618
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              347,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           347,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: February 5, 2015 519459 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of 

MILTON C. DAVIS, 

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: December 2, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________

Milton C. Davis, Stone Mountain, Georgia, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City

(Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Board, filed February 13, 2014, which ruled, among other things,

that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment

insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment

without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the

Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant

resigned from his employment as a counselor with a nonprofit

agency for personal and noncompelling reasons. The record

establishes that although continuing work was available, claimant

resigned from his job because he was nervous that a lack of a

signed contract between the employer and the federal government

for the funding of the services provided by the employer would

result in his loss of employment. Inasmuch as resigning from a

job in anticipation of being discharged has been held not to

constitute good cause for leaving employment (see Matter of
-2- 519459 

Carcaterra [Association for Computing Mach., Inc.-Commissioner of

Labor], 90 AD3d 1389, 1390 [2011]; Matter of Dixon-Weaver

[Commissioner of Labor], 67 AD3d 1243, 1244 [2009]), we find no

reason to disturb the Board's decision that claimant was

disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits under

the circumstances herein. Furthermore, because claimant

indicated on his application for unemployment insurance benefits

that his separation from employment was due to lack of work, the

Board's finding that he made a willful false statement to obtain

benefits will not be disturbed (see Matter of Ferreira

[Commissioner of Labor], 84 AD3d 1609, 1610-1611 [2011]; Matter

of DeGennaro [Commissioner of Labor], 68 AD3d 1274, 1275 [2009]).

Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely in connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Retractable Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Thomas J. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas W. Cowan, Chief Financial Officer, do
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



/s/ THOMAS J. SHAWTHOMAS J. SHAW PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/s/ DOUGLAS W. COWANDOUGLAS W. COWAN VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25930]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Addition to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add a product to the Procurement 
List that will be furnished by a nonprofit agency employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments Must Be Received on Or Before: 12/1/2014.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT COMMENTS CONTACT: Patricia 
Briscoe, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
action.

Addition

    If the Committee approves the proposed addition, the entity of the 
Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the product listed below from the nonprofit agency employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following product is proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for production by the nonprofit agency listed:

Product

NSN: 8520-01-432-2618--Hand Soap, Liquid, Biobased
NPA: The Lighthouse for the Blind, St. Louis, MO
Contracting Activity: General Services Administration, Fort Worth, 
TX
Coverage: A-List for the Total Government Requirement as aggregated 
by the General Services Administration, Fort Worth, TX.

Patricia Briscoe,
Deputy Director, Business Operations, (Pricing and Information 
Management).
[FR Doc. 2014-25930 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
251 La. 736

#### C. I. T. CORPORATION v. J. B. LEE TRACTOR & IMPLEMENT COMPANY, Inc., et al., Commercial Credit Equipment Corporation.

No. 49023.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 2, 1968.

In re: C. I. T. Corporation applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 204 So.2d 106.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
#### Hubert FOUNTAIN, a/k/a Hubert Fountain, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-115.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 25, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7550
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM RAYMOND DURHAM, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-86, CA-01-546) Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 20, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Raymond Durham, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William Raymond Durham seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Durham , Nos. CR-92-86; CA-01-546 (W.D. Va. July 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2023155EN.01005102.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — SE v Commission

(Case T-763/21) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Commission’s pilot programme for recruiting junior administrators - Rejection of application - Eligibility conditions - Criterion of a maximum of three years of professional experience - Equal treatment - Discrimination based on age)

(2023/C 155/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: SE (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Schima, L. Vernier and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 23 April 2021 by which the Commission rejected his application for the pilot ‘Junior Professionals Programme’ (‘the JPP’) and, second, compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders SE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.

---
#### STATE of Louisiana and Sheriff of St. Landry Parish et al. v. Willie Joe DOMINGUE.

No. 53578.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1973.

In re: Willie Joe Domingue applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. Moot as State of Louisiana v. Willie Domingue, No. 27-774 has been nolle prossed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,731,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,524,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                   130,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,371,885
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,176,718
<PP&E>                                      12,883,755
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,683,848
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,417,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,046,173
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,613
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,744,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,417,431
<SALES>                                     26,470,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,470,200
<CGS>                                       23,462,472
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,462,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (180,177)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               130,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             186,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (123,995)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   138,420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (262,415)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (262,415)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>