### API/NPRA Comments on Non

- Continental Liquids Subcategory July 15, 2011 ATTACHMENT 1

### API/NPRA Comments on Non

- Continental Liquids Subcategory July 15, 2011 ATTACHMENT 2

# Tesoro Hawaii Refinery SG - 1102 Boiler Engineering Test s for Carbon Monoxide , Particulates and Metals
Report Number : 10

- 1933 October 7

- 9 , 20 10

Prepared for: Tesoro Hawaii Refinery 91 - 325 Komohana Street Kapolei, HI 96707

Prepared by: Emission Technologi es, Inc. 15609 Peterson Road, Suite D Burlington, WA 98233

### INVOLVED PARTIES: Contact: Albert Alvarez 91

- 325 Komohana Street Kapolei, HI 96707 Phone: (808) 547

- 3824 Fax: (808) 547

- 3868 E

- mail: aalvarez@tsocorp.com Emission Technologies, Inc. Contact: Rob Rusi 15609

- D Peterson Rd. Burlington, Washington 98233 Phone: (800) 507

- 9018 Phone: (360) 757

- 1210 Fax: (360) 757

- 1118 E

- mail: eti@eti

- usepa.com

### REPORT TEXT

SUMMARIES

F

IELD DATA GASES: PM TEST

FIELD/LAB DATA

PARTICULATES

FIELD DATA GASES: METALS TEST

FIELD/LAB DATA METALS

TEST AMERICA LABORATORY REPORT

QUALITY ASSURANCE/ QUALITY CONTROL

## Report Text Introduction Test Overview Overview of Sampling Methods Results and Reporting Conditions Process Overview Participants

### Introduction: Tesoro Hawaii Refinery (Tesoro) operat es a n 82 MMBtu heat input steam generator, (SG

- 1102) which produces steam for refinery processes. At the time of the source test, the boiler was firing at 32.3 MMBtu/hr based on stack flow rates and dry fuel factors. Emission Technologies Inc. (ETI) was contracted by Tesoro to provide some “in house” testing on the boiler for carbon carbon monoxide (CO), particulates (PM) and metals

. The metals to be tested were arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, manganese, nickel and lead. Test Overview: ETI performed tests on the outlet (stack) of the SG

- 1102 on October 7 th 

### through the 9 th



### . Table 1.0 lists the overall sampling pro gram used. Source tests for each parameter are specified following the standard EPA requirements listed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. 

## Table 1.0 Field Sampling Program
Unit Parameter Test Method Number of Test Runs Time/Test SG

- 1102 Sample Point Determinati on EPA Methods 1 1

- SG

- 1102 Velocity and Flow EPA Method 2 6 60/180 minutes SG

- 1102 O 2 

### and CO 2 

### EPA Method 3A 6 60/180 minutes SG

- 1102 Moisture EPA Method 4 6 60/180 minutes SG

- 1102 PM EPA Methods 5/202 3 60 minutes SG

- 1102 CO EPA Method 10 6 60/1 80 minutes SG

- 1102 Metals EPA Method 29 3 180 minutes

### Overview of the Sampling Methods : EPA Method 1

- Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources EPA Method 1 was used to aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate from a stationary source. A measurement site where the effluent stream was flowing in a known direction was selected, and the cross

- section of the stack was divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point was then located within each of these equal areas. The sampling travers e points for Method 1 need only be determined once. EPA Method 2

- Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate The average gas velocity in each stack was determined from the gas density and from measurement of the average velocity head wit h a Type S (Stausscheibe) or reverse type Pitot tube. EPA Method 4

– Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas A sample of the gas stream was extracted at a constant rate and then condensed and metered using an EPA Method 5 sample train. The weight gain of moisture condensed was determined gravimetrically. The moisture content is measured as grams of water collected and referenced to the amount of dry gas sampled to get the fractional water content of the stack gas. EPA Method 5/202 - Determination of Particulate and Condensable Particulate Matter Particulate matter wa s withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 248 ± 25 ° F ( 120 ± 14°C )

. Particulate matter that wa s dep osited on the nozzle, probe and front half of the filer holder we re rinsed with acetone and collected in sample bottles. The acetone wa s then evaporated off at the laboratory and desiccated for 24 hours. The particulate mass from the rinse and filter we re determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. The condensable particulate matter (CPM) , back half fraction , is the material that condenses after passing through the filter and wa s analyzed using Method 202 (OTM28). The method uses a Metho d 5 sampling train with the addition of a condenser, a water dropout impinger and a modified Greenburg Smith impinger (both dry) followed by a Teflon CPM filter. The impinger contents we re immediately purged after the run for one hour with nitrogen to rem ove dissolved sulfur dioxide gases

. The CPM filter was extracted with water and methylene chloride. The impingers are recovered, rinsed and the organic and aqueous fractions are separated using

### methylene chloride . The organic and aqueous fractions are then taken to dryness and residues weighed. The total of both fractions represen ts the CPM. EPA Method 3A

- Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental) EPA Method 10

– Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental ) Methods 3A and 10 use electronic gas a nalyzers for the measurement of O 2 

### , CO 2 

### and CO. The sampled gas was continuously extracted from the stack through a heated probe/filter assembly to a moisture knock

- out that removed water from the stack gas. The dry stack gas was transported from the outl et of the moisture knock

- out through a Teflon line to a mobile test trailer containing the gas analyzer. Inside the test trailer the stack gas passed through a vacuum/pressure pump to a gas manifold. The sampled gas was divided into separate streams thr ough stainless steel metering valves and glass flow meters. The analyzer detected the concentration of analyte gas within the sample and produced an output electrical signal proportional to analyte gas concentration. The electrical signals were recorded on a laptop computer. Instrument calibrations (zero and span checks) were performed as per 40 CFR 60. Sampling system calibration (external calibration) was accomplished by sending EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases to a location ahead of the filter assemb ly. Analyzer calibration and linearity determinations (internal calibration) were accomplished by sending the EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases directly to the analyzers. All components of the gas sampling and calibration system were constructed of Teflon , 316 stainless steel, or glass. The sample vacuum/pressure pump head was constructed of 316 stainless steel, Viton O

- rings, and a Teflon coated diaphragm. EPA Method 29 - Metals A stack sample wa s withdrawn isokinetically from the source, particulate emi ssions we re collected in the probe and on a heated filter, and gaseous emissions we re then collected in an aqueous acidic solution of hydrogen peroxide

. Samples were sent to an outside laboratory for analysis. The recovered samples we re digested and appropriate fractions
we re analyzed for arsenic (As), beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), Lead (P b), Manganese (Mn) and nickel (Ni) we re analyzed by inductively coupled plasma

mass spectroscopy (ICP

- MS)

.

### Results and Reporting Conditions The results of the pollutant emission tests are presented in Section 2. The units of reporting for the gases are parts per million dry volume (ppmdv) and pounds per hour (lb/hr)

. The units of reporting for the gases are parts per million dry volume (ppmdv), pounds per hour (lb/hr) and pounds per million Btu (lb/MMBtu). Particulates are reported in units of milligrams (mg), grains per dry standard cub ic foot (gr/dscf), gr/dscf corrected to 7% oxygen, lb/hr and lb/MMBtu. Metals are reported in units of micrograms per cubic foot ( **μ** g/cf) and lb/hr. The emission rates presented in the summaries are referenced to EPA standard conditions of 29.92 inches of mercury (“Hg) and 68 o 

### F.

### Process Overview: The boiler, which is fired on refinery fuel gas (RFG), fuel oil or a combination of both fuels, is rated at 82 MMBtu/hr heat input. The unit was running on fuel oil during the test. Figure 1 shows a conceptual diagram of the sampling location on the SG

- 1102

.

SG
- 1102

ETI Test Trailer 

### Figure 1 Participants: ETI: **•** Mr. Robert Ru si, Project Manager
**•** Mr. David Wagner , Field Technician **•** Mr. Paige Mendoza , Field Technician **•** Ms. Wendy Pounds, Quality Assurance Supervisor Tesoro: **•** Mr. Albert Alvarez served as project manager for Tesoro Hawaii Refinery.

## Summar ies Table 2.0 .1 Summary of Gases ; 10/09/10 Table 2. 0.2 Summary of Metals ; 10/09/10 Table 2.1.1 Summary of Gases; 10/07/10 - 10/08/10 Table 2.1.2 Summary of Metals; 10/07/10 - 10/0 8/10Client Tesoro Date: 10/09/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Unit: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

1 2 3

1 2 3

1 2 3 Average ppmdv 0.96 2.48 3.32 2.25 ppmdv @ 15% O 2 0.35 0.93 1.25 0.84 lb/MMBtu 0.0008 0.0022 0.0030 0.0020 lb/hr 0.021 0.057 0.077 0.052 

## Summary

Table 2.0.1
Run Number O 2 Average 5.12

11.69 11.86 4.89 5.19 5.29 Run Number Average Percent

Percent 12.09 11.79

CO 2

CO Run Number:Client Tesoro Date: 10/09/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Unit: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1933

RUN #1 Net Wt. gr/dscf (mg) @ 7% O 2 FRONT HALF: Probe & Nozzle:............................ 1.7 0.00099 0.00088 0.00086 0.00170 0.042 Filter:............................................ 2.1 0.00122 0.00108 0.00106 0.00210 0.052 Totals:............................................ 3.8 0.00221 0.00196 0.00192 0.00380 0.094 BACK HALF: Inorganic:...................................... 142.9 0.08318 0.07396 0.07222 0.14299 3.561 Organic:........................................ 12.5 0.00728 0.00647 0.00632 0.01251 0.312 Totals:............................................ 155.4 0.09046 0.08043 0.07854 0.15550 3.873 TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 159.2 0.0927 0.0824 0.0805 0.15930 3.967 RUN #2 Net Wt. gr/dscf (mg) @ 7% O 2 FRONT HALF: Probe & Nozzle:............................ 4.8 0.00253 0.00224 0.00224 0.00443 0.115 Filter:............................................ 0.8 0.00042 0.00037 0.00037 0.00074 0.019 Totals:............................................ 5.6 0.00295 0.00261 0.00261 0.00517 0.134 BACK HALF : Inorganic:...................................... 91.4 0.04813 0.04269 0.04258 0.08432 2.187 Organic:........................................ 12.6 0.00663 0.00588 0.00587 0.01162 0.301 Totals:............................................ 104.0 0.05476 0.04857 0.04845 0.09594 2.488 TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 109.6 0.05771 0.05118 0.05106 0.10111 2.622 RUN #3 Net Wt. gr/dscf (mg) @ 7% O 2 FRONT HALF: Probe & Nozzle:............................ 3.6 0.00189 0.00168 0.00168 0.00333 0.087 Filter:............................................ 0.0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.000 Totals:............................................ 3.6 0.00189 0.00168 0.00168 0.00333 0.087 BACK HALF : Inorganic:...................................... 73.5 0.03859 0.03424 0.03436 0.06804 1.773 Organic:........................................ 3.4 0.00179 0.00159 0.00159 0.00316 0.082 Totals:............................................ 76.9 0.04038 0.03583 0.03595 0.07120 1.855 TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 80.5 0.04227 0.03751 0.03763 0.07453 1.942 Net Wt. gr/dscf AVERAGES FOR ALL RUNS (mg) @ 7% O 2 FRONT HALF: 4.3 0.0024 0.0021 0.0021 0.00410 0.105 BACK HALF : 112.1 0.0619 0.0549 0.0543 0.10755 2.739 TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):........ 116.4 0.0642 0.0570 0.0564 0.11165 2.844 lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu gr/dscf gr/scf lb/hr

Particulate Results: gr/dscf gr/scf lb/hr Particulate Results: 

## Summary - Method 5 Particulate

Table 2.0.2

Particulate Results: gr/scf lb/hr

gr/scf lb/hr Particulate Results: gr/dscf

gr/dscfClient Tesoro Date: 10/07/10 Location: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10 Unit: Boiler #3 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

10/07/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 1 2 3

1 2 3

1 2 3 Average ppmdv 8.81 2.52 5.82 5.72

lb/hr 0.195 0.055 0.129 0.126 Percent 11.18 11.81 11.64 11.54

CO Run Number: Percent 6.20 5.28 5.43 5.64

CO 2 Run Number Average 

## Summary

Table 2.1.1

O 2 Run Number AverageClient: Tesoro Date : 10/07/10 City: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

10/07/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 1.603 1.526 1.452 1.527 lb/hr 0.00108 0.00102 0.00098 0.00103 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.00184 0.00184 0.00181 0.00183 lb/hr 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000012 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.00184 0.00184 0.00181 0.00183 lb/hr 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000012 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.0214 0.0103 0.0089 0.0135 lb/hr 0.0000144 0.0000069 0.0000060 0.0000091 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.0205 0.0065 0.0117 0.01290 lb/hr 0.0000138 0.0000043 0.0000079 0.0000087 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.00836 0.00712 0.00700 0.00749 lb/hr 0.0000056 0.0000047 0.0000047 0.0000050 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.405 0.424 0.408 0.412 lb/hr 0.00027 0.00028 0.00028 0.00028 Nickel Run Number Manganese Run Number Cadmium

Chromium Run Number

Lead Run Number Run Number

Run Number 

## Summary

Table 2.1.2

Run Number Arsenic

Beryllium 

### Method 29 Metals Testing

## PARTICULATES TEST Gases: O 2 

### , CO 2 

### & CO Table 3.0. 0 - 3.0. 3 Calibration Data Sheets Table 3.1.1 Run 1 Gases Table 3 .1.2 Run 2 Gases Table 3. 1 .3 Run 3 GasesClient: Tesoro ETI: Rob Rusi Location: Kapolei, HI Dave Wagner Unit: Boiler Paige Mendoza Site: 1102 Fuel: Fuel Oil Date: 10/09/10 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Instrument Information: Instrument Channel Color Model O 2 - - ZRE CO 2 - - ZRE SO 2 - - - NO x - - - CO

- - ZRE HCs

- - - Recorders:

- - -
Calibration Information: Instrument Units Zero Span Range Gas Cyl. No. O 2 % N 2 12.40 21.30 CC56348 O 2 % N 2 21.3 21.30 CC231540 CO 2 % N 2 12.5 21.00 CC56348 CO 2 % N 2 21 21.00 CC231540 SO 2 ppmv - - - - - SO 2 ppmv - - - - - NO x ppmv - - - - - NO x ppmv - - - - - CO ppmv N 2 99.1 188.0 CC56781 CO ppmv N 2 188.0 188.0 CC233240 HCs ppmv - - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - - - 

## Calibration Data

Table 3.0.0
Serial No. A0A6534T Make

A0A6534T

- -

Gas Flow (L/min) - CAI CAI

-

- - CAI

- A0A6534T

0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

0.5 0.5Client: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.0 0.0 Mid-Range Gas 12.4 12.3 High-Range Gas 21.3 21.1 40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 12.4

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.05% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.47%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.47% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.47% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.5% 0.0% 3 Analyzer Calibration Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 

### Direct Calibration Mode

0.00% 0.47% 0.94% Difference from Cylinder Value 0.00 0.10

Pre

1
2 

### Table 3.0.1

0.20 

### O 2 

### Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal)Client: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.0 0.01 Mid-Range Gas 12.5 12.3 High-Range Gas 21.0 21.2 40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 12.5

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Pre

1
2 

### Table 3.0.2

0.20 

### CO 2 

### Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal)

3 Analyzer Calibration Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 

### Direct Calibration Mode

0.05% 0.95% 0.95% Difference from Cylinder Value 0.01 0.20Client: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.0 0.81 Mid-Range Gas 99.1 96.0 High-Range Gas 188.0 185.0 40 CFR 60 Method 10-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 99.1

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.81 0.20 0.61 0.32% Upscale Gas 96.00 95.30 0.70 0.37%

Zero Gas 0.81 0.36 0.45 0.16 0.24% 0.09% Upscale Gas 96.00 95.80 0.20 0.50 0.11% 0.27%

Zero Gas 0.81 0.45 0.36 0.09 0.19% 0.05% Upscale Gas 96.00 96.10 0.10 0.30 0.05% 0.16%

Zero Gas 0.81 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.24% 0.05% Upscale Gas 96.00 95.40 0.60 0.70 0.32% 0.37% 3 Analyzer Calibration Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 

### Direct Calibration Mode

0.43% 1.65% 1.60% Difference from Cylinder Value 0.81 3.10

Pre

1
2 

### Table 3.0.3

3.00 

### CO Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal)Client: Tesoro Run: 1 Site: 1102 Start Time: 8:45 Date: 10/09/10 End Time: 9:44

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs 8:45 4.9 12.0

- - 0.9

- 8:46 4.8 12.0

- - 0.9

- 8:47 4.7 12.0

- - 1.0

- 8:48 4.8 12.0

- - 0.8

- 8:49 4.8 11.9

- - 1.1

- 8:50 4.8 11.9

- - 0.9

- 8:51 4.9 11.9

- - 1.1

- 8:52 4.9 11.9

- - 0.8

- 8:53 4.9 11.9

- - 0.9

- 8:54 4.9 11.9

- - 0.9

- 8:55 4.9 11.9

- - 0.8

- 8:56 4.9 11.9

- - 1.0

- 8:57 4.9 11.9

- - 1.0

- 8:58 4.8 11.9

- - 1.0

- 8:59 4.8 12.0

- - 1.1

- 9:00 4.8 11.9

- - 1.0

- 9:01 4.8 11.9

- - 0.8

- 9:02 4.8 11.9

- - 0.9

- 9:03 4.9 11.9

- - 0.9

- 9:04 4.9 11.9

- - 1.0

- 9:05 4.9 11.9

- - 1.0

- 9:06 4.9 11.9

- - 1.0

- 9:07 4.9 11.9

- - 0.9

- 9:08 4.8 11.9

- - 1.1

- 9:09 4.8 11.9

- - 1.2

- 9:10 4.8 12.0

- - 1.0

- 9:11 4.8 12.0

- - 0.9

- 9:12 4.8 11.9

- - 1.1

- 9:13 4.8 11.9

- - 1.1

- 9:14 4.9 11.9

- - 1.1

- 9:15 4.9 11.8

- - 1.1

- 9:16 5.0 11.8

- - 1.2

- 9:17 5.0 11.8

- - 1.2

- 9:18 5.0 11.8

- - 1.2

- 9:19 5.0 11.8

- - 1.3

- 9:20 5.0 11.8

- - 1.2

- 9:21 4.9 11.9

- - 1.0

- 9:22 5.0 11.8

- - 1.2

- 9:23 4.9 11.9

- - 1.1

- 9:24 4.9 11.9

- - 1.3

- 9:25 4.9 11.9

- - 1.3

- 9:26 5.0 11.8

- - 1.4

- 9:27 4.9 11.9

- - 1.4

- 9:28 4.9 11.9

- - 1.3

- 9:29 5.0 11.8

- - 1.2

- 9:30 5.0 11.8

- - 1.5

- 9:31 5.0 11.8

- - 1.4

- 9:32 5.0 11.8

- - 1.5

- 9:33 5.0 11.8

- - 1.2

- 9:34 5.0 11.8

- - 1.6

- 9:35 4.9 11.9

- - 1.8

- 9:36 4.9 11.9

- - 1.6

- 9:37 4.9 11.9

- - 1.3

- 9:38 5.0 11.8

- - 1.6

- 9:39 5.0 11.8

- - 1.5

- 9:40 5.0 11.8

- - 1.7

- 9:41 5.0 11.8

- - 1.4

- 9:42 5.0 11.8

- - 1.6

- 9:43 5.1 11.8

- - 1.8

- 9:44 5.1 11.8

- - 1.7

- Raw Avg: 4.9 11.9

- - 1.2

- Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 4.89 12.09 - - 0.96 - Table 3.1.1 

### ETI Field DataClient: Tesoro Run: 2 Site: 1102 Start Time: 10:21 Date: 10/09/10 End Time: 11:20

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs 10:21 5.2 11.6

- - 2.8

- 10:22 5.2 11.6

- - 2.5

- 10:23 5.2 11.7

- - 2.3

- 10:24 5.1 11.7

- - 2.4

- 10:25 5.1 11.7

- - 2.4

- 10:26 5.1 11.8

- - 2.4

- 10:27 5.1 11.7

- - 2.6

- 10:28 5.1 11.7

- - 2.6

- 10:29 5.1 11.7

- - 2.3

- 10:30 5.2 11.7

- - 2.6

- 10:31 5.2 11.6

- - 2.4

- 10:32 5.2 11.6

- - 2.6

- 10:33 5.2 11.6

- - 2.7

- 10:34 5.2 11.7

- - 2.7

- 10:35 5.2 11.7

- - 2.8

- 10:36 5.2 11.7

- - 2.8

- 10:37 5.1 11.7

- - 2.6

- 10:38 5.1 11.7

- - 2.3

- 10:39 5.1 11.7

- - 2.5

- 10:40 5.1 11.7

- - 2.7

- 10:41 5.1 11.7

- - 2.5

- 10:42 5.1 11.7

- - 2.5

- 10:43 5.1 11.7

- - 2.4

- 10:44 5.1 11.7

- - 2.8

- 10:45 5.2 11.6

- - 2.7

- 10:46 5.2 11.6

- - 2.6

- 10:47 5.2 11.6

- - 2.8

- 10:48 5.2 11.6

- - 2.7

- 10:49 5.2 11.7

- - 2.8

- 10:50 5.2 11.7

- - 2.8

- 10:51 5.2 11.7

- - 2.6

- 10:52 5.2 11.6

- - 2.7

- 10:53 5.3 11.6

- - 2.8

- 10:54 5.3 11.6

- - 2.7

- 10:55 5.3 11.6

- - 2.9

- 10:56 5.3 11.6

- - 2.9

- 10:57 5.3 11.5

- - 3.0

- 10:58 5.3 11.6

- - 3.1

- 10:59 5.2 11.6

- - 3.1

- 11:00 5.2 11.6

- - 3.3

- 11:01 5.2 11.7

- - 3.1

- 11:02 5.2 11.7

- - 2.8

- 11:03 5.2 11.6

- - 3.2

- 11:04 5.2 11.6

- - 3.2

- 11:05 5.2 11.7

- - 3.0

- 11:06 5.2 11.7

- - 2.8

- 11:07 5.2 11.6

- - 2.8

- 11:08 5.2 11.6

- - 3.1

- 11:09 5.2 11.6

- - 2.9

- 11:10 5.3 11.6

- - 3.2

- 11:11 5.3 11.6

- - 3.2

- 11:12 5.3 11.6

- - 3.1

- 11:13 5.3 11.6

- - 3.0

- 11:14 5.2 11.6

- - 3.2

- 11:15 5.2 11.6

- - 3.4

- 11:16 5.2 11.6

- - 3.3

- 11:17 5.3 11.6

- - 3.4

- 11:18 5.2 11.6

- - 3.2

- 11:19 5.2 11.6

- - 3.4

- 11:20 5.2 11.6

- - 3.2

- Raw Avg: 5.2 11.6

- - 2.8

- Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 5.19 11.79 - - 2.48 - Table 3.1.2 

### ETI Field DataClient: Tesoro Run: 3 Site: 1102 Start Time: 12:02 Date: 10/09/10 End Time: 13:01

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs 12:02 5.4 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:03 5.4 11.5

- - 3.8

- 12:04 5.4 11.4

- - 3.8

- 12:05 5.4 11.5

- - 3.3

- 12:06 5.3 11.5

- - 3.3

- 12:07 5.3 11.5

- - 3.5

- 12:08 5.3 11.5

- - 3.4

- 12:09 5.3 11.5

- - 3.4

- 12:10 5.3 11.5

- - 3.3

- 12:11 5.3 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:12 5.3 11.5

- - 3.5

- 12:13 5.3 11.5

- - 3.3

- 12:14 5.3 11.5

- - 3.5

- 12:15 5.3 11.5

- - 3.4

- 12:16 5.3 11.5

- - 3.5

- 12:17 5.4 11.5

- - 3.3

- 12:18 5.3 11.5

- - 3.7

- 12:19 5.3 11.5

- - 3.5

- 12:20 5.3 11.5

- - 3.4

- 12:21 5.3 11.5

- - 3.3

- 12:22 5.2 11.5

- - 3.3

- 12:23 5.3 11.5

- - 3.4

- 12:24 5.3 11.5

- - 3.4

- 12:25 5.3 11.5

- - 3.2

- 12:26 5.3 11.5

- - 3.2

- 12:27 5.4 11.5

- - 3.7

- 12:28 5.4 11.4

- - 3.7

- 12:29 5.4 11.4

- - 3.7

- 12:30 5.4 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:31 5.4 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:32 5.3 11.5

- - 3.5

- 12:33 5.3 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:34 5.2 11.6

- - 3.7

- 12:35 5.2 11.6

- - 3.4

- 12:36 5.3 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:37 5.3 11.5

- - 3.7

- 12:38 5.3 11.5

- - 3.9

- 12:39 5.3 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:40 5.3 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:41 5.4 11.4

- - 3.6

- 12:42 5.4 11.4

- - 3.5

- 12:43 5.4 11.4

- - 3.8

- 12:44 5.4 11.5

- - 3.8

- 12:45 5.3 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:46 5.3 11.5

- - 3.6

- 12:47 5.3 11.5

- - 3.7

- 12:48 5.2 11.6

- - 3.6

- 12:49 5.3 11.5

- - 3.9

- 12:50 5.3 11.5

- - 3.7

- 12:51 5.3 11.5

- - 4.0

- 12:52 5.3 11.5

- - 3.8

- 12:53 5.3 11.5

- - 3.8

- 12:54 5.4 11.4

- - 3.8

- 12:55 5.3 11.5

- - 4.0

- 12:56 5.3 11.5

- - 4.0

- 12:57 5.3 11.5

- - 4.0

- 12:58 5.3 11.5

- - 4.0

- 12:59 5.3 11.5

- - 4.3

- 13:00 5.3 11.5

- - 4.0

- 13:01 5.3 11.5

- - 4.1

- Raw Avg: 5.3 11.5

- - 3.6

- Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 5.29 11.69 - - 3.32 - Table 3.1.3 

### ETI Field Data

## PARTICULATES TEST Flows Table 4 . 0 Flows and Moisture Data S heet Table 4 . 1 Lab Data Table 4. 2 Fuel Data
Raw Data SheetsClient: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Unit: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1933

1 2 3 Run Start Time: 8:39 10:21 12:02 Run Finish Time: 9:39 11:21 13:02 **θ** Sample Time, minutes 60 60 60 Stack Shape (Circle or Rectangle): V m Dry Gas Meter Reading,dcf

.................. ...........INITIAL: 696.543 724.083 754.358 FINAL: 723.702 754.143 784.413 V m Volume of dry gas sampled, dcf 27.159 30.060 30.055 Y Meter box calibration factor 1.008 1.008 1.008 P bar Barometric pressure, inches Hg 30.13 30.11 30.09 P static Stack static pressure, inches H 2 O -0.07 -0.06 -0.06 **∆** H Differential meter press, inches H 2 O 0.5436 0.6126 0.6240 T m Meter temperature, degrees F 90.9 91.3 89.3 V lc Volume of H 2 O collected, ml 70.0 79.0 79.0 %O 2 Percent of oxygen in stack gas 4.89 5.19 5.29 %CO 2 Percent carbon dioxide in stack gas 12.09 11.79 11.69

C p Type-S pitot tube coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 Ave. square root of pitot readings, (inches H 2 O) 1/2 0.1689 0.1799 0.1816 T s Stack temperature, degrees F 403.4 406.8 404.3 D s Stack diameter, feet - CIRCLE 4.00 4.00 4.00 L s , W s Stack dimensions, feet - RECTANGLE

D n Nozzle diameter, inches 0.440 0.440 0.440 A n Nozzle area, ft 2 0.001056 0.001056 0.001056 Calculated Values:

V m(std) Meter corrected volume,dscf 26.457 29.248 29.331 V w(std) Volume of water vapor,dscf 3.301 3.725 3.725

B ws Fraction of H 2 O vapor 0.1109 0.1130 0.1127 B ws/sat Fraction of H 2 O vapor at saturated conditions 8.7982 9.0562 8.8740 %N 2 Percent nitrogen in stack gas 83.02 83.02 83.02 M d Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 30.13 30.09 30.08 M w Wet molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 28.78 28.72 28.72 A d Cross sectional area of stack, ft 2 12.57 12.57 12.57 P s Absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg 30.12 30.11 30.09 V s Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec 12.10 12.93 13.04 Q std Average stack volumetric flowrate, wscfm 5,618 5,977 6,042 Q std Average stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm 4,995 5,302 5,361

I Percent isokinetic sampling 105.1 109.5 108.6 Circle 

### Table 4.0 Flows and Moisture Field Data

Run Number:

avg P **∆**Client: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Unit: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1933

PARTICULATE LABORATORY DATA:
1 2 3 1.8997 1.9107 1.9118 1.8970 1.9049 1.9072 Blank acetone weight, g............................................. 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0017 0.0048 0.0036 0.3288 0.3298 0.3270 0.3267 0.3290 0.3279 0.0021 0.0008 0.0000 TOTAL FRONT HALF PARTICULATE, g: 0.0038 0.0056 0.0036

1 2 3 2.0764 2.0064 1.9873 1.8818 1.8827 1.8874 0.0517 0.0323 0.0264 0.1429 0.0914 0.0735
1.9188 1.9148 1.9041 1.9060 1.9019 1.9004 Blank methylene chloride weight, g.............................. 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0125 0.0126 0.0034

V t

-Volume of NH 4 OH titrant, ml............................ 30.35 18.95 15.50
TOTAL BACK HALF PARTICULATE, g: 0.1554 0.1040 0.0769

0.1096 0.0805 TOTAL PARTICULATE, g: 0.1592 Organic: Final weight, g:..................................................................... Tare weight, g:................................................................. Weight gain, g:.................................................................... Inorganic: Final weight, g:..................................................................... Tare weight, g:................................................................. Weight gain, g:................................................................ Probe/Nozzle Wash Residue Wt

. Final weight, g:..................................................................... Tare weight, g:....................................................................... Weight gain, g:........................................................

M c - Mass of NH 4 + added to sample, g:................................. Run Number: 

## Laboratory Data

Table 4.1

Run Number:

BACK HALF OF TRAIN FRONT HALF OF TRAIN

Filter Wt. Final weight, g:..................................................................... Tare weight, g:....................................................................... Weight gain, g:........................................................Unit: Tesoro Date: 10/09/10 Client: Kapolei, HI Fuel: Fuel Oil Location: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Fuel Data/Ambient Conditions 1 2 3
Q f Fuel flow rate, scfm

- - - F BTU Fuel heating value - gross Btu/lb 19,688 19,688 19,688 F O2 O 2 F-factor, dscf/MMBtu 9,218 9,218 9,218 %O 2 Average percent of oxygen in stack gas 4.89 5.19 5.29 lb/hr CO 2 emissions from stack

- - - Calculated Values: 1 2 3
Q std , (Ave stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm)

- - - Fuel Flow (MMBtu/hr)

- - - 

## M-19 Stack Flow

Table 4.2
Run Number:

Run Number:Page 1 of 1



### Tesoro Hawaii Corporation 91-325 Komohana Steet, Kapolei, HI 96707 Sample ID 803746 Unit CDU Code Unit Fuel Oil Sample Date 10/04/2010 06:00 Test Date 10/04/2010 05:05 Crude Name PYRENEES-DURI-ARAB_EX_LT-SAHARAN Method Test Result Units D4052 API Gravity 22.0 API Meth19 GHG-Carbon by weight 87.3 wt% Meth19 GHG-Gross Heating Value 19228.3 Btu/lb Meth19 Fd Fuel Factor 9289.3 dSCF/MMBtu D240 Calorific Value, Gross Btu/lb 19228.3 Btu/lb D240 Calorific Value, Gross Btu/gal 1.4761 th/gal D240 Calorific Value, G MMBtu/bbl 6.200 Btubbl D7171 Hydrogen Content by NMR wt% 12.33 wt% D5762 Nitrogen, Instrument Reading 18.4 mg/L D5762 Dilution Factor 50x D5762 Nitrogen, Total ppm 1063 ppm D5762 Ambient Temperature 72 °F D4294 Sulfur, wt% 0.261 wt% D445 Viscosity @ 210 F, cSt 6.6 cSt D445 Viscosity @ 210 F, SUS 47.8 SUS

## METALS TEST Gases: O 2 

### , CO 2 

### & CO Table 5 .0.0 - 5 .0.3 Calibration Data Sheets Table 5 .1.1 Run 1 Gases Table 5 .1.2 Run 2 Gases Table 5 .1.3 Run 3 GasesClient: Tesoro ETI: Rob Rusi Location: Kapolei, HI Dave Wagner Unit: Boiler #3 Paige Mendoza Site: SG1102 Date: 10/07/10 ETI Job No: 10-1933 10/08/10

Instrument Information: Instrument Channel Color Model O 2 - - ZRE CO 2 - - ZRE SO 2 - - - NO x - - - CO

- - ZRE HCs

- - - Recorders:

- - -
Calibration Information: Instrument Units Zero Span Range Gas Cyl. No. O 2 % N 2 12.40 21.30 CC56348 O 2 % N 2 21.3 21.30 CC231540 CO 2 % N 2 12.5 21.00 CC56348 CO 2 % N 2 21 21.00 CC231540 SO 2 ppmv - - - - - SO 2 ppmv - - - - - NO x ppmv - - - - - NO x ppmv - - - - - CO ppmv N 2 99.1 188.0 CC56781 CO ppmv N 2 188.0 188.0 CC233240 HCs ppmv - - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - - 0.5 Gas Flow (L/min) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

0.5 CAI A0A6534T

- -

- - CAI A0A6534T

- -

- - 

## Calibration Data

Table 5.0.0
Make Serial No. CAI A0A6534TClient: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10 Location: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 Mid-Range Gas 12.40 12.40 High-Range Gas 21.30 21.30 40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 12.4

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.40 12.40 0.00 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.40 12.40 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.40 12.50 0.10 0.10 0.47% 0.47%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.40 12.60 0.20 0.10 0.94% 0.47% Pre

1
2
3 0.00 

### Table 5.0.1 O 2 

### Analyzer Calibration Data Direct Calibration Mode 3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal) Difference from Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration

Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00%Client: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10 Location: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 Mid-Range Gas 12.50 12.50 High-Range Gas 21.00 21.00 40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 12.5

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.50 12.30 0.20 0.95%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.50 12.30 0.20 0.00 0.95% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.48% 0.48% Upscale Gas 12.50 12.25 0.25 0.05 1.19% 0.24%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.24% 0.24% Upscale Gas 12.50 12.23 0.27 0.02 1.29% 0.10% Pre

1
2
3 0.00 

### Table 5.0.2 CO 2 

### Analyzer Calibration Data Direct Calibration Mode 3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal) Difference from Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration

Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00%Client: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10 Location: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.00 1.00 Mid-Range Gas 99.10 96.00 High-Range Gas 188.00 186.00 40 CFR 60 Method 10-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 99.1

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.0% Upscale Gas 96.00 97.70 1.70 0.9%

Zero Gas 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Upscale Gas 96.00 97.70 1.70 0.00 0.9% 0.0%

Zero Gas 1.00 0.10 0.90 0.90 0.5% 0.5% Upscale Gas 96.00 96.20 0.20 1.50 0.1% 0.8%

Zero Gas 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.3% 0.2% Upscale Gas 96.00 95.10 0.90 1.10 0.5% 0.6% Pre

1
2
3 1.00 

### Table 5.0.3 CO Analyzer Calibration Data Direct Calibration Mode 3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal) Difference from Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration

Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 0.5% 3.10 1.6% 2.00 1.1%Client: Tesoro Run: 1 Site: SG1102 Start Time: 15:30 Date: 10/07/10 End Time: 18:30

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Raw Avg: 6.2 11.0

- - 9.6

- Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 6.20 11.18 - - 8.81 - 

## ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.1Client: Tesoro Run: 2 Site: SG1102 Start Time: 8:45 Date: 10/08/10 End Time: 11:45

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Raw Avg: 5.3 11.6

- - 3.0

- Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 5.28 11.81 - - 2.52 - 

## ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.2Client: Tesoro Run: 3 Site: SG1102 Start Time: 12:26 Date: 10/08/10 End Time: 15:26

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Raw Avg: 5.5 11.4

- - 5.9

- Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 5.43 11.64 - - 5.82 - 

## ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.3

## METAL S TEST Flows Table 6 . 0 Flows and Moisture Data Sheet Table 6 . 1 Lab Data

Raw Data SheetsClient: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10 City: Kapolei, HI 10/08/10 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

1 2 3 10/07/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 START TIME:............................................... 15:30 8:45 12:26 END TIME..................................................... 18:30 11:45 15:26 **θ** Sample Time, minutes 180 180 180 Stack Shape (Circle or Rectangle): Circle V m Volume of dry gas sampled, cf 83.766 85.316 85.583 Y Meter box calibration factor 1.008 1.008 1.008 P bar Barometric pressure, inches Hg 29.90 29.87 29.91 P static Stack static pressure, inches H 2 O -0.07 -0.06 -0.06 **∆** H Differential meter press, inches H 2 O 0.6008 0.6075 0.6138 T m Meter temperature, degrees F 88.8 97.2 90.5 V lc Volume of H 2 O collected, ml 212 230 230 %O 2 Percent of oxygen in stack gas 6.20 5.28 5.43 %CO 2 Percent carbon dioxide in stack gas 11.18 11.81 11.64

C p Type-S pitot tube coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 Ave. square root of pitot readings, (inches H 2 O) 1/2 0.1723 0.1723 0.1743 T s Stack temperature, degrees F 405.8 409.5 408.2 D s Stack diameter, feet - CIRCLE 4.00 4.00 4.00 L s , W s Stack dimensions, feet - RECTANGLE NA NA NA

D n Nozzle diameter, inches 0.434 0.434 0.436 A n Nozzle area, ft 2 0.001027 0.001027 0.001037 Calculated Values: V m(std) Meter corrected volume,dscf 81.302 81.477 82.839 V w(std) Volume of water vapor,dscf 10.00 10.84 10.84

B ws Fraction of H 2 O vapor 0.1095 0.1174 0.1157 %N 2 Percent nitrogen in stack gas 82.62 82.91 82.93 M d Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 30.04 30.10 30.08 M w Wet molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 28.72 28.68 28.68 A d Cross sectional area of stack, ft 2 12.57 12.57 12.57 P s Absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg 29.89 29.87 29.91 V s Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec 12.43 12.47 12.59 Q std Average stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm 5,086 5,032 5,105

I Percent isokinetic sampling 108.8 110.2 109.3 

## Flows and Moisture Field Data

Table 6.0
Run Number

avg P **∆**Client: Tesoro Date: 10/07/10 City: Kapolei, HI Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1933

1 2 3 Sample 131.00 125.00 121.00 Blank 0.68 0.68 0.68 Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60 Total, **μ** g 130.32 124.32 120.32 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 1.603 1.526 1.452 Sample Blank Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total, **μ** g 0.15 0.15 0.15 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.00184 0.00184 0.00181 Sample 0.21 0.16 0.25 Blank 0.25 0.25 0.25 Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total, **μ** g 0.15 0.15 0.15 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.00184 0.00184 0.00181 Sample 2.60 1.70 1.60 Blank 0.86 0.86 0.86 Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60 Total, **μ** g 1.74 0.84 0.74 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.0214 0.0103 0.0089 Sample 2.00 0.86 1.30 Blank 0.33 0.33 0.33 Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total, **μ** g 1.67 0.53 0.97 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.0205 0.0065 0.0117 Sample 1.10 1.00 1.00 Blank 0.42 0.42 0.42 Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60 Total, **μ** g 0.68 0.58 0.58 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.00836 0.00712 0.00700 Sample 33.7 35.3 34.6 Blank 0.78 0.78 0.78 Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total, **μ** g 32.92 34.52 33.82 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.405 0.424 0.408 results ≤ 0 reported as 1/2 the detection limit 

## Lab Data Method 29 Metals Testing

Table 6.1

Manganese, **μ** g Run Number

Lead, **μ** g Chromium, **μ** g Cadmium, **μ** g Beryllium, **μ** g

Arsenic, **μ** g

Nickel, **μ** g

## TEST AMERICA LAB REP ORT880 Riverside Parkway West Sacramento, CA 95605 tel 916.373.5600 fax 916.372.1059 www.testamericainc.com 

### November 4, 2010 TestAmerica Project Number: G0J150622 PO/Contract: 10-1933 Robert Rusi Emission Technologies 15609 D Peterson Rd Burlington, WA 98233

Dear Mr. Rusi, This report contains the analytical results for the samples received under chain of custody by TestAmerica on October 14, 2010. These samples are associated with your 10-1933 Tesoro project. The test results in this report meet a ll NELAC requirements for parameters that accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are noted in the case narrative. The case narra tive is an integral part of this report. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (916) 374-4333. Sincerely,

Robert Weidenfeld Project Manager

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 1 of 25

## Table of Contents 

# TestAmerica West Sacramento Project Number G0J150622

Case Narrative Quality Assurance Program Sample Description Information Chain of Custody Documentation AIR, M29 Metals by ICPMS Samples: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Sample Data Sheets Method Blank Reports Laboratory QC Reports

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 2 of 25

# Case Narrative TestAmerica West Sacramento Project Number G0J150622
AIR, ICPMS, Metals The RPD for nickel in the duplicate analysis report is above the upper limit of 15.

There are no additional anomalies associated with this project.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 3 of 25

### TestAmerica Laboratories West Sacramento Certifications/Accreditations Certifying State Certificate # Certifying State Certificate # Alaska UST-055 New York* 11666 Arizona AZ0708 Oregon* CA 200005 Arkansas 88-0691 Pennsylvania 68-1272 California* 01119CA South Carolina 87014

Colorado NA Texas T104704399-08-TX Connecticut PH-0691 Utah* QUAN1

Florida* E87570 Virginia 00178 Georgia 960 Washington C1281 Hawaii NA West Virginia 9930C, 334 Illinois 200060 Wisconsin 998204680 Kansas* E-10375 NFESC NA Louisiana* 30612 USACE NA Michigan 9947 USDA Foreign Plant 37-82605 Nevada CA44 USDA Foreign Soil P330-09-00055 New Jersey* CA005 US Fish & Wildlife LE148388-0 New Mexico NA Guam 09-014r *NELAP accredited. A more detailed parameter list is available upon request. Updated 3/25/2009 

### QC Parameter Definitions QC Batch : The QC batch consists of a set of up to 20 field samples that behave similarly (i.e., same matrix) and are processed using the same procedures, reagents, and standards at the same time. 

### Method Blank : An analytical control consisting of all reagents, which may include internal standards and surrogates, and is carried through the entire analytical procedure. The method blank is used to define the level of laboratory background contamination. 

### Laboratory Control Sample and Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCS/LCSD): An aliquot of blank matrix spiked with known amounts of representative target analytes. The LCS (and LCSD as required) is carried through the entire an alytical process and is used to m onitor the accuracy of the analytical process independent of potential matrix effects. If an LCSD is performed, it may also be used to evaluate the precision of the process. 

### Duplicate Sample (DU): Different aliquots of the same sample are analyzed to evaluate the precision of an analysis. 

### Surrogates: Organic compounds not expected to be detected in field samples, which behave similarly to target analytes. These are added to every sample within a batch at a known concentration to determine the efficiency of the sample prep aration and analytical process. 

### Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): An MS is an aliquot of a matrix fortified with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to an entire analytical procedure in order to indicate the appropriateness of the method for a particular matrix. The percent recovery for the respective compound(s) is then calculated. The MSD is a second aliquot of the same matrix as the matrix spike, also spiked, in order to determine the precision of the method. 

### Isotope Dilution : For isotope dilution methods, isotopically labeled analogs (internal standards) of the native target analytes are spiked into the sample at time of extraction. These internal standards are used for quantitation, and monitor and correct for matrix effects. Since matrix effects on method performance can be judged by the recovery of these analogs, there is little added benefit of performing MS/MSD for these methods. MS/MSD are only performed for client or QAPP requirements. 

### Control Limits: The reported control limits are either based on laboratory historical data, method requirements, or project data quality objectives. The control limits represent the estimated uncertainty of the test results.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 4 of 25

# Sample Summary TestAmerica West Sacramento Project Number G0J150622

WO# Sample # Client Sample ID Sampling Date Received Date L8LC1 1 M29-R1-DIESEL 10/ 4/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM L8LC1 1 M29-R1-DIESEL DUP 10/4/2010 10/14/ 2010 09:05 AM L8LC3 2 M29-R2-DIESEL 10/ 4/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM L8LC4 3 M29-R3-DIESEL 10/ 5/2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM L8LC5 4 M29-R1-KEROSENE 10/5/2010 10/14/ 2010 09:05 AM L8LC6 5 M29-R2-KEROSENE 10/6/2010 10/14/ 2010 09:05 AM L8LC7 6 M29-R3-KEROSENE 10/6/2010 10/14/ 2010 09:05 AM L8LC8 7 M29-R1-1102 10/7/ 2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM L8LC9 8 M29-R2-1102 10/8/ 2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM L8LDC 9 M29-R3-1102 10/8/ 2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM L8LDD 10 M29-BLANK 10/8/ 2010 10/14/2010 09:05 AM


### Notes(s): - The analytical results of the samples listed above are presented on the following pages. 

### - All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

### - Results noted as “ND” were not detected at or above the stated limit. 

### - This report must not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. - Results for the following parameters are never reported on a dry weight basis: color, co rrosivity, density, flashpoint, ignitability, layers, odor, paint filter test, pH, porosity, pre ssure, reactivity, redox potential, specific gravity, spot test s, solids, solubility, temperature, viscosity, and weight.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 5 of 25G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 6 of 25G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 7 of 25G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 8 of 25G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 9 of 25

# AIR, M29 Metals by ICPMS

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 10 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-R1-DIESEL

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-001 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/04/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 0.92 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AA

L8LC11AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 0.096 B

0.096 B 0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AD

L8LC11AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 1.4

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AE

L8LC11AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 0.90

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AF

L8LC11AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 0.89 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AG

L8LC11AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 1.0 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC11AH

L8LC11AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level. B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 11 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-R2-DIESEL

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-002 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/04/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 1.2 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AA

L8LC31AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium Beryllium 0.17 B

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AC

L8LC31AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 2.4

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AD

L8LC31AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 1.8

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AE

L8LC31AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 0.93

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AF

L8LC31AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 1.7 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AG

L8LC31AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 1.0 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC31AH

L8LC31AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level. B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 12 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-R3-DIESEL

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-003 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/05/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 1.6 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AA

L8LC41AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 0.13 B

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AD

L8LC41AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 1.5

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AE

L8LC41AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 0.78

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AF

L8LC41AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 1.5 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AG

L8LC41AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 0.59 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC41AH

L8LC41AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level. B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 13 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-R1-KEROSENE

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-004 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/05/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 0.38 B,J

0.38 B,J 0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AA

L8LC51AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 0.052 B

0.052 B 0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AD

L8LC51AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 1.4

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AE

L8LC51AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 0.59

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AF

L8LC51AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 0.50 B,J

0.50 B,J 0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AG

L8LC51AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 0.47 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC51AH

L8LC51AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 14 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-R2-KEROSENE

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-005 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/06/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 0.22 B,J

0.22 B,J 0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AA

L8LC61AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 0.12 B

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AD

L8LC61AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 1.2

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AE

L8LC61AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 0.62

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AF

L8LC61AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 0.39 B,J

0.39 B,J 0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AG

L8LC61AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 0.59 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC61AH

L8LC61AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 15 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-R3-KEROSENE

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-006 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/06/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 0.37 B,J

0.37 B,J 0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AA

L8LC71AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 0.12 B

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AD

L8LC71AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 1.2

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AE

L8LC71AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 0.62

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AF

L8LC71AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 0.93 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AG

L8LC71AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 0.46 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC71AH

L8LC71AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 16 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-R1-1102

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-007 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/07/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 131 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AA

L8LC81AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 0.21 B

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AD

L8LC81AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 2.6

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AE

L8LC81AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 1.1

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AF

L8LC81AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 33.7 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AG

L8LC81AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 2.0 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC81AH

L8LC81AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level. B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 17 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-R2-1102

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-008 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/08/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 125 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AA

L8LC91AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 0.16 B

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AD

L8LC91AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 1.7

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AE

L8LC91AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 1.0

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AF

L8LC91AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 35.3 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AG

L8LC91AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 0.86 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LC91AH

L8LC91AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level. B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 18 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-R3-1102

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-009 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/08/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 121 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AA

L8LDC1AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 0.25 B

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AD

L8LDC1AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 1.6

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AE

L8LDC1AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 1.0

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AF

L8LDC1AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 34.6 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AG

L8LDC1AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 1.3 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDC1AH

L8LDC1AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level. B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 19 of 25Emission Technologies Client Sample ID: M29-BLANK

TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622-010 Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/08/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 0.68 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AA

L8LDD1AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium Cadmium 0.25 B

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AD

L8LDD1AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium Chromium 0.86

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AE

L8LDD1AE Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese Manganese 0.42

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AF

L8LDD1AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 0.78 J

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AG

L8LDD1AG Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 0.33 J

0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L8LDD1AH

L8LDD1AH Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level. B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 20 of 25

## QC DATA ASSOCIATION SUMMARY
G0J150622

Sample Preparation and Analysis Control Numbers

ANALYTICAL LEACH PREP SAMPLE#_______ MATRIX

_______ METHOD

________________ BATCH # _______ BATCH #

_______ MS RUN#

_______ 001 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134 002 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134 003 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134 004 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134 005 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134 006 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134 007 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134 008 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134 009 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134 010 AIR SW846 6020 0301292 0307134

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 21 of 25METHOD BLANK REPORT TOTAL Metals Client Lot #...: Client Lot #...: G0J150622 Matrix.........: Matrix.........: AIR
REPORTING PREPARATION- WORK PARAMETER _______________ RESULT

_____________ LIMIT

_________ UNITS

__________ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ ORDER #

________ MB Lot-Sample #: MB Lot-Sample #: G0J280000-292 Prep Batch #...: Prep Batch #...: 0301292 Arsenic Arsenic 0.34 B

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AA

L88E21AA Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AC Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AD Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium ND 0.60 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AE Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 0.073 B

0.073 B 0.30

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AH

L88E21AH Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese ND 0.30 ug SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AF Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 0.21 B

0.60

ug

SW846 6020

SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 10/28-11/01/10 L88E21AG

L88E21AG Dilution Factor: 1 NOTE(S):

____________________________________________________________________________________________ Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 22 of 25LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622 Matrix.........: Matrix.........: AIR
PERCENT RECOVERY RPD PREPARATION- PREPPARAMETER ___________ RECOVERY

________ LIMITS

__________ RPD

____ LIMITS ______ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ BATCH #

_______ Arsenic 90 (79 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

90 (79 - 110) 0.30 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium 88 (70 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

87 (70 - 110) 0.70 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium 90 (79 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

91 (79 - 110) 1.5 (0-16) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium 95 (84 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

95 (84 - 110) 0.19 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 92 (86 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

94 (86 - 110) 2.0 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese 96 (84 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

95 (84 - 110) 1.8 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 98 (86 - 110) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

96 (86 - 110) 2.2 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1
NOTE(S):

____________________________________________________________________________________________ Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 23 of 25LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DATA REPORT TOTAL Metals Lot-Sample #...: Lot-Sample #...: G0J150622 Matrix.........: Matrix.........: AIR
SPIKE MEASURED PERCNT PREPARATION- PREP PARAMETER ____________ AMOUNT

_______ AMOUNT

________ UNITS

________ RECVRY

______ RPD

____ METHOD _________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ BATCH #

_______ Arsenic 60.0 53.7 ug 90 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 53.9 ug 90 0.30 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium 60.0 52.8 ug 88 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 52.4 ug 87 0.70 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium 60.0 53.8 ug 90 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 54.6 ug 91 1.5 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium 60.0 57.3 ug 95 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 57.1 ug 95 0.19 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Lead 60.0 55.1 ug 92 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 56.2 ug 94 2.0 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese 60.0 57.8 ug 96 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 56.8 ug 95 1.8 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel 60.0 58.6 ug 98 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292

60.0 57.3 ug 96 2.2 SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1
NOTE(S):

____________________________________________________________________________________________ Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 24 of 25SAMPLE DUPLICATE EVALUATION REPORT Metals Client Lot #...: Client Lot #...: G0J150622 Work Order #...: Work Order #...: L8LC1-SMP Matrix.......: Matrix.......: AIR L8LC1-DUP Date Sampled...: Date Sampled...: 10/04/10 Date Received..: Date Received..: 10/14/10
DUPLICATE RPD PREPARATION- PREP PARAM_____ RESULT ___________ RESULT

___________ UNITS

________ RPD

_____ LIMIT _______ METHOD

_________________ ANALYSIS DATE ______________ BATCH #

_______ Arsenic SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001 0.92 J 0.94 ug 1.5 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Beryllium SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001 ND ND ug 0 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Cadmium SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001 0.096 B 0.090 B ug 6.1 (0-16) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Chromium SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001 1.4 1.7 ug 14 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Manganese SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001 0.90 0.95 ug 5.2 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Nickel SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001 0.89 J 1.4 ug 48 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1 Lead SD Lot-Sample #: G0J150622-001 1.0 J 1.0 ug 0.66 (0-15) SW846 6020 10/28-11/01/10 0301292 Dilution Factor: 1
NOTE(S):

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level. B Estimated result. Result is less than RL.

G0J150622 TestAmerica West Sacramento (916) 373 - 5600 25 of 25

## Quality Assurance/Quality Control ETI QA Document Hand Calculations Gas Certifications Meter CalibrationsQUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL Emission Technologies, Inc. continued success is an example of their pride taken in quality testing. Analytical procedures and environmental measurement data are structured with a quality assurance program which equals or exceeds the minimum QA/QC requirements set forth by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for each applicable method. ETI executes the following topics through every test project to ensure valid measurement data:

**∗** Preventable Maintenance **∗** Pre

- test and Post

- test Calibration **∗** Blanks and Spiked Samples **∗** Field System Checks **∗** QA/QC Matrix Tables **∗** Employment of QA/QC Officer The following table is an activity matrix for Method 8 from the EPA Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Syste ms. By diligently following such activity matrix tables, Emission Technologies, Inc. reports justifiable, valid measurement data.

_____________________________________________________________________________________ T ABLE 1.1 A CTIVITY M ATRIX FOR P ROCUR EMENT OF A PPARATUS & S UPPLIES
A CTION IF F REQUENCY AND METHOD REQUIREMENTS A PPARATUS A CCEPTANCE LIMITS OF MEASUREMENT ARE NOT MET Sampling Sampling probe Capable of 100 o C Visually check; run Repair, return with hea ting (212 o F) exit air at heating system to supplier, system flow rate of 20 L/min checkout or reject Probe nozzle Stainless steel (316); Visually check before Reshape and sharp, tapered, leading each test; use a sharpen, edge (angle **≤** 30 o ); micrometer to measure return to the difference between ID before field use supplier, or measured ID’s **≤** 0.1 after each repair reject mm (0.004 in.); no nicks, dents, or corrosion; uniquely identified (Meth. 5, Sec. 3.4.2) Pitot tube Type

- S (Meth. 2, Calibrate according Repair or Sec. 3.1.2); attached to Meth. 2, Sec. 3.1.2 return to to probe with impact supplier (high pressure) opening plane even with or above nozzle entry planeT ABLE 1.1 ( CONTINUED ) A CTION IF F REQUENCY AND METHOD REQUIREMENTS A PPARATUS A CCEPTANCE LIMITS OF MEASUREMENT ARE NOT MET Differential Criteria in Meth. 2, Check against gauge

- As above pressure Sec. 3.1.2; agree oil m anometer at a gauge within 5% of gauge

- minimum of three (manometer) oil manometer used points: [0.64(0.025), to calibrate 12.7(0.5), 25.4(1.0)] mm (in.) H 2 0 Vacuum gauge 0

- 760 mm Hg range; Check against a Adjust or + 25 mm (1 in.) Hg mercury U

- tube manometer return to accuracy at 380 mm upon receipt supplier (15 in.) Hg Vacuum pump Capable of maintaining Check upon receipt Repair or a flow rate of 0.03

- for leaks and return to 0.05 m 3 / min (1

- 1 .7 ft 3 / capacity supplier min) for pump inlet vacuum of 380 mm (15 in.) Hg with pump out

let at 760 mm (29.92 in.) Hg; leak free at 380 mm (15 in.) Hg Orifice meter **∆** H @ of 46.74 + 6.35 Visually check upon Repair, if mm (1.84 + 0.25 in.) receipt for damage; possible; (recommended) calibrate against otherwise, wet test meter return to supplier Impingers Standard stock glass; Visually check upon Return to pressure drop across r eceipt; check pressure supplier impingers not excessive drop (Method 8, Sec. 3.7.1) Filter holder Leak free (Method 8, Visually check before As above Sec. 3.7.1) use Filters Glass fiber without Manufacture’s Return to organic binder guarantee that filters supplier and designed to remove meet ASTM standard replace 99.95% ( **≤** 0.05% method D2986

- 71; penetration) of 0.3

- **μ** m observe under light dioctyl phthalate for defects smoke particlesT ABLE 1.1 ( CONTINUED ) A CTION IF F REQUENCY AND METHOD REQUIREMENTS A PPARATUS A CCEPTANCE LIMITS OF MEASUREMENT ARE NOT MET Hydrogen 30% H 2 O 2 reagent Upon receipt, check Replace or peroxide grade or certified label for grade or return to supplier ACS certification Potassium KI reagent grade or As above As above iodide certified ACS Thorin 1

- (o

- arsonophenylazo)

- Upon receipt, check As above indicator 2

- naphthol

- 3,6 disul

- label for gra de or fonic acid disodium certification salt, reagent grade or certified ACS Barium perchlor - Ba(ClO 4 ) 2 - 3H 2 0,

- As above As above ate trihydrate reagent grade or solution certified ACS Sulfuric acid H 2 SO 4 , 0.0100 N + Certified by manufacturer, As above solution 0.0002N or standardize against 0.0100N NaOH previously standardized against potassium acid phthalate (primary standard grade) NO x NO x to NO Before each field te st; Repair Chemiluminescence conversion efficiency Introduce a concentration Analyzer 

### ≥ 90% of 40

- 60 ppm NO 2 to the analyzer in direct cal mode; Calculate converter efficiency: 

### 100 C C Eff V Dir NO 2 

### × **=**

_____________________________________________________________________________________

### API/NPRA Comments on Non

- Continental Liquids Subcategory July 15, 2011 ATTACHMENT 3

# Tesoro Hawaii Refinery SG - 1102 Boiler Engineering Test s for Particulates and Metals
Report Number : 10

- 19 82 December 11

- 13 , 20 10

Prepared for: Tesoro Hawaii Refinery 91 - 325 Komohana Street Kapolei, HI 96707

Prepared by: Emission Technologies, Inc. 15609 Peterson Road, Suite D Burlington, WA 98233

### INVOLVED PARTIES:

Contact: Albert Alvarez 91

- 325 Komohana Street Kapolei, HI 96707 Phone: (808) 547

- 3824 Fax: (808) 547

- 3868 E

- mail: aalvarez@tsocorp.com Emission Technologies, Inc. Contact: Rob Rusi 15609

- D Peterson Rd. Burlington, Washington 98233 Phone: (800) 507

- 9018 Phone: (360) 757

- 1210 Fax: (360) 757

- 1118 E

- mail: eti@eti

- usepa.com

### REPORT TEXT

SUMMARIES

FIELD DATA GASES: PM TEST

FIELD/LAB DATA PARTICULATES

FIELD DATA GASES: METALS TEST

FIELD/LAB DATA

METALS

TEST AMERICA LABORATORY REPORT

QUALITY ASSURANCE/ Q UALITY CONTROL

## Report Text

Introduction Test Overview Overview of Sampling Methods Results and Reporting Conditions Process Overview Participants

### Introduction:

Tesoro Hawaii Refinery (Tesoro) operates a n 82 MMBtu /hr heat input steam generator, (SG

- 1102) which produces steam for refinery processes. At the time of the source test, the boiler was firing at 32.3 MMBtu/hr based on stack flow rates and dry fuel factors. Emission Technologies Inc. (ETI) was contracted by Tesoro to provide some “in house” testing on the boiler for particulates (PM) and metals

. The metals to be tested were arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, manganese, nickel and lead. Test Overview: ETI performed tests on the outlet (stack) of the SG

- 1 102 on December 11 th 

### through the 13 th 

### . Table 1.0 lists the overall sampling program used. Source tests for each parameter are specified following the standard EPA requirements listed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. 

## Table 1.0 Field Sampling Program
Unit Paramete r Test Method Number of Test Runs Time/Test SG

- 1102 Sample Point

Determination EPA Methods 1 1

- SG

- 1102 Velocity and Flow EPA Method 2 6 60/1 92 minutes SG

- 1102 O 2 

### and CO 2 

### EPA Method 3A 6 60/1 92 minutes SG

- 1102 Moisture EPA Method 4 6 60/1 92 minut es SG

- 1102 PM EPA Methods 5/202 3 60 minutes SG

- 1102 Metals EPA Method 29 3 1 92 minutes

### Overview of the Sampling Methods :

EPA Method 1

- Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources EPA Method 1 was used to aid in the representative measurem ent of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate from a stationary source. A measurement site where the effluent stream was flowing in a known direction was selected, and the cross

- section of the stack was divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point was then located within each of these equal areas. The sampling traverse points for Method 1 need only be determined once. EPA Method 2

- Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate The average gas velocity in each stack was determined from the gas density and from measurement of the average velocity head with a Type S (Stausscheibe) or reverse type Pitot tube. EPA Method 4

– Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas A sample of the gas stream was extracted at a con stant rate and then condensed and metered using an EPA Method 5 sample train. The weight gain of moisture condensed was determined gravimetrically. The moisture content is measured as grams of water collected and referenced to the amount of dry gas sampl ed to get the fractional water content of the stack gas. EPA Method 5/202 - Determination of Particulate and Condensable Particulate Matter Particulate matter wa s withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 248 ± 25 ° F ( 120 ± 14°C )

. Particulate matter that wa s deposited on the nozzle, probe and front half of the filer holder we re rinsed with acetone and collected in sample bottles. The acetone wa s then evaporated off at the la boratory and desiccated for 24 hours. The particulate mass from the rinse and filter we re determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. The condensable particulate matter (CPM) , back half fraction , is the material that condenses after pass ing through the filter and wa s analyzed using Method 202 (OTM28). The method uses a Method 5 sampling train with the addition of a condenser, a water dropout impinger and a modified Greenburg

- Smith impinger (both dry) followed by a Teflon CPM filter. The i mpinger contents we re immediately purged after the run for one hour with nitrogen to remove dissolved sulfur dioxide gases . The CPM filter was extracted with water and methylene chloride. The impingers are recovered, rinsed and the organic and aqueous frac tions are separated using

### methylene chloride . The organic and aqueous fractions are then taken to dryness and residues

weighed. The total of both fractions represents the CPM. EPA Method 3A

- Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Statio nary Sources

(Instrumental) Method 3A use s electronic gas analyzers for the measurement of O 2 

### and CO 2 

### . The sampled gas was continuously extracted from the stack through a heated probe/filter assembly to a moisture knock

- out that removed water from the stac k gas. The dry stack gas was transported from the outlet of the moisture knock

- out through a Teflon line to a mobile test trailer containing the gas analyzer. Inside the test trailer the stack gas passed through a vacuum/pressure pump to a gas manifold. Th e sampled gas was divided into separate streams through stainless steel metering valves and glass flow meters. The analyzer detected the concentration of analyte gas within the sample and produced an output electrical signal proportional to analyte gas con centration. The electrical signals were recorded on a laptop computer. Instrument calibrations (zero and span checks) were performed as per 40 CFR 60. Sampling system calibration (external calibration) was accomplished by sending EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases to a location ahead of the filter assembly. Analyzer calibration and linearity determinations (internal calibration) were accomplished by sending the EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases directly to the analyzers. All components of the gas sampling and calibration system were constructed of Teflon, 316 stainless steel, or glass. The sample vacuum/pressure pump head was constructed of 316 stainless steel, Viton O

- rings, and a Teflon coated diaphragm. EPA Method 29

– Multiple Metals A stack sample wa s with drawn isokinetically from the source, particulate emissions we re collected in the probe and on a heated filter, and gaseous emissions we re then collected in an aqueous acidic solution of hydrogen peroxide (analyzed for all metals)

. Samples were sent to
an outside laboratory for analysis. The recovered samples we re digested and appropriate fractions we re analyzed for arsenic (As), beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), Lead (P b), Manganese (Mn) and nickel (Ni) we re analyzed by inductively coupled plasm a - mass spectroscopy (ICP

- MS)

. Results and Reporting Conditions The results of the pollutant emission tests are presented in Section 2. The units of reporting for the gases are parts per million dry volume (ppmdv) and pounds per hour (lb/hr)

. The units of reporting for

### the gases are parts per million dry volume (ppmdv), pounds per hour (lb/hr) and pounds per million

Btu (lb/MMBtu). Particulates are reported in units of milligrams (mg), grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf), gr/dscf corrected to 7% o xygen, lb/hr and lb/MMBtu. Metals are reported in units of micrograms per cubic foot ( g/cf) and lb/hr. The emission rates presented in the summaries are referenced to EPA standard conditions of 29.92 inches of mercury (“Hg) and 68 o 

### F.

### Process Overview:

The boiler, which is fired on refinery fuel gas (RFG), fuel oil or a combination of both fuels, is rated at 82 MMBtu/hr heat input. The unit was running on fuel oil during the test. Figure 1 shows a conceptual diagram of the sampling location on the SG

- 1 102

.

Figure 1 Participants: ETI: Mr. Scott Chesnut , Project Manager Mr. David Wagner , Field Technician Mr. Paige Mendoza , Field Technician Ms. Wendy Pounds, Quality Assurance Supervisor Tesoro: Mr. Albert Alvarez served a s P roject M anager for Tesoro Hawaii Refinery.

## Summar ies Table 2.0 .1 Summary of Gases ; 1 2 / 11 - 12 /10 Table 2. 0.2 Summary of Metals ; 1 2 / 11 - 12 /10 Table 2.1.1 Summary of Gases; 1 2 / 13 /10 Table 2.1.2 Summary of Particulates ; 1 2 / 13 /10Client Tesoro Date: 12/13/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Unit: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

1 2 3

1 2 3 Percent

Percent 10.26 10.36

CO 2 6.93

10.47 10.36 6.90 7.00 6.90 Run Number Average



## Summary

Table 2.0.1
Run Number O 2 AverageClient Tesoro Date: 12/13/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Unit: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1982

RUN #1 Net Wt. gr/dscf (mg) @ 7% O 2 FRONT HALF: Probe & Nozzle:............................ 4.2 0.00170 0.00150 0.00169 0.00334 0.074 Filter:............................................ 1.0 0.00040 0.00035 0.00040 0.00079 0.017 Totals:............................................ 5.2 0.00210 0.00185 0.00209 0.00413 0.091 BACK HALF: Inorganic:...................................... 111.9 0.04524 0.03996 0.04492 0.08894 1.957 Organic:........................................ 2.7 0.00109 0.00096 0.00108 0.00214 0.047 Totals:............................................ 114.6 0.04633 0.04092 0.04600 0.09108 2.004 TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 119.8 0.0484 0.0428 0.0481 0.09521 2.095 RUN #2 Net Wt. gr/dscf (mg) @ 7% O 2 FRONT HALF: Probe & Nozzle:............................ 5.4 0.00288 0.00256 0.00288 0.00570 0.102 Filter:............................................ 0.7 0.00037 0.00033 0.00037 0.00073 0.013 Totals:............................................ 6.1 0.00325 0.00289 0.00325 0.00643 0.115 BACK HALF : Inorganic:...................................... 51.9 0.02769 0.02459 0.02769 0.05483 0.983 Organic:........................................ 2.8 0.00149 0.00132 0.00149 0.00295 0.053 Totals:............................................ 54.7 0.02918 0.02591 0.02918 0.05778 1.036 TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 60.8 0.03243 0.02880 0.03243 0.06421 1.151 RUN #3 Net Wt. gr/dscf (mg) @ 7% O 2 FRONT HALF: Probe & Nozzle:............................ 6.0 0.00297 0.00263 0.00295 0.00584 0.113 Filter:............................................ 0.0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.000 Totals:............................................ 6.0 0.00297 0.00263 0.00295 0.00584 0.113 BACK HALF : Inorganic:...................................... 96.2 0.04757 0.04210 0.04723 0.09352 1.805 Organic:........................................ 2.0 0.00099 0.00088 0.00098 0.00195 0.038 Totals:............................................ 98.2 0.04856 0.04298 0.04821 0.09547 1.843 TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):..... 104.2 0.05153 0.04561 0.05116 0.10131 1.956 Net Wt. gr/dscf AVERAGES FOR ALL RUNS (mg) @ 7% O 2 FRONT HALF: 5.8 0.0028 0.0025 0.0028 0.00547 0.106 BACK HALF : 89.2 0.0414 0.0366 0.0411 0.08144 1.628 TOTAL (FRONT & BACK):........ 94.9 0.0441 0.0391 0.0439 0.08691 1.734 

## Summary - Method 5 Particulate

Table 2.0.2

Particulate Results: gr/scf lb/hr

gr/scf lb/hr Particulate Results: gr/dscf

gr/dscf

lb/hr

Particulate Results: gr/dscf gr/scf lb/hr Particulate Results: lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu

lb/MMBtu gr/dscf gr/scfClient Tesoro Date: 12/11/10 Location: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10 Unit: Boiler #3 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

10/07/10 10/08/10 10/08/10 1 2 3

1 2 3 Percent 10.67 10.56 10.25 10.49 Percent 6.30 6.42 6.77 6.50

CO 2 Run Number Average 

## Summary

Table 2.1.1

O 2 Run Number AverageClient: Tesoro Date : 12/11/10 City: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

12/11/10 12/12/10 12/12/10 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.206 0.163 0.117 0.162 lb/hr 0.00012 0.00010 0.00007 0.00010 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.00302 0.00167 0.00175 0.00215 lb/hr 0.0000018 0.0000010 0.0000010 0.0000013 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.03325 0.01837 0.02041 0.02401 lb/hr 0.0000197 0.0000113 0.0000119 0.0000143 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.0242 0.0479 0.0210 0.0310 lb/hr 0.0000144 0.0000294 0.0000122 0.0000187 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.0516 0.1454 0.0063 0.06777 lb/hr 0.0000306 0.0000892 0.0000037 0.0000412 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 0.01773 0.01425 0.01493 0.01564 lb/hr 0.0000105 0.0000087 0.0000087 0.0000093 1 2 3 Average **μ** g/ft 3 1.104 0.976 0.669 0.916 lb/hr 0.00066 0.00060 0.00039 0.00055 Nickel Run Number Manganese Run Number Cadmium

Chromium Run Number

Lead Run Number Run Number

Run Number 

## Summary

Table 2.1.2

Run Number Arsenic

Beryllium 

### Method 29 Metals Testing

## METAL S TEST Gases: O 2 & 

### CO 2 

### Table 3.0. 0 - 3.0. 3 Calibration Data Sheets Table 3.1.1 Run 1 Gases Table 3 .1.2 Run 2 Gases Table 3. 1 .3 Run 3 GasesClient: Tesoro ETI: Scott Chesnut Location: Kapolei, HI Dave Wagner Unit: Boiler Paige Mendoza Site: 1102 Fuel: Fuel Oil Date: 12/13/10 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Instrument Information: Instrument Channel Color Model O 2 - - ZRE CO 2 - - ZRE SO 2 - - - NO x - - - CO

- - - HCs

- - - Recorders:

- - -
Calibration Information: Instrument Units Zero Span Range Gas Cyl. No. O 2 % N 2 12.40 21.30 CC56348 O 2 % N 2 21.3 21.30 CC231540 CO 2 % N 2 12.5 21.00 CC56348 CO 2 % N 2 21 21.00 CC231540 SO 2 ppmv - - - - SO 2 ppmv - - - - NO x ppmv - - - - NO x ppmv - - - - CO ppmv - - - - CO ppmv - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - -

-

- 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

-

- -

-

-

- Gas Flow (L/min) - CAI CAI

-

- - 

## Calibration Data

Table 3.0.0
Serial No. A0A6534T Make

A0A6534T

- -

-

- -

-Client: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.0 0.0 Mid-Range Gas 12.4 12.3 High-Range Gas 21.3 21.1 40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 12.4

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.05% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.47%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.47% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.47% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.40 0.10 0.00 0.5% 0.0% Pre

1
2 

### Table 3.0.1

0.20 

### O 2 

### Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal)

3 Analyzer Calibration Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 

### Direct Calibration Mode

0.00% 0.47% 0.94% Difference from Cylinder Value 0.00 0.10Client: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.0 0.01 Mid-Range Gas 12.5 12.3 High-Range Gas 21.0 21.2 40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 12.5

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% Upscale Gas 12.30 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 3 Analyzer Calibration Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 

### Direct Calibration Mode

0.05% 0.95% 0.95% Difference from Cylinder Value 0.01 0.20

Pre

1
2 

### Table 3.0.2

0.20 

### CO 2 

### Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal)Client: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.0 0.81 Mid-Range Gas

- 96.0 High-Range Gas

- 185.0 40 CFR 60 Method 10-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid

-

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.81 0.20 0.61 #VALUE! Upscale Gas 96.00 95.30 0.70 #VALUE!

Zero Gas 0.81 0.36 0.45 0.16 #VALUE! #VALUE! Upscale Gas 96.00 95.80 0.20 0.50 #VALUE! #VALUE!

Zero Gas 0.81 0.45 0.36 0.09 #VALUE! #VALUE! Upscale Gas 96.00 96.10 0.10 0.30 #VALUE! #VALUE!

Zero Gas 0.81 0.36 0.45 0.09 #VALUE! #VALUE! Upscale Gas 96.00 95.40 0.60 0.70 #VALUE! #VALUE! Pre

1
2 

### Table 3.0.3

#VALUE! 

### CO Analyzer Calibration Data

3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal)

3 Analyzer Calibration Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 

### Direct Calibration Mode

#VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! Difference from Cylinder Value 0.81 #VALUE!Client: Tesoro Run: 1 Site: 1102 Start Time: 7:45 Date: 12/13/10 End Time: 8:44

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs 7:45 7.0 10.3

- - - - 7:46 6.9 10.3

- - - - 7:47 6.9 10.3

- - - - 7:48 7.0 10.2

- - - - 7:49 6.9 10.2

- - - - 7:50 6.9 10.3

- - - - 7:51 6.9 10.2

- - - - 7:52 6.9 10.2

- - - - 7:53 6.9 10.2

- - - - 7:54 6.9 10.2

- - - - 7:55 6.9 10.2

- - - - 7:56 6.9 10.2

- - - - 7:57 6.9 10.2

- - - - 7:58 6.9 10.2

- - - - 7:59 7.0 10.1

- - - - 8:00 6.9 10.2

- - - - 8:01 6.9 10.2

- - - - 8:02 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:03 6.9 10.2

- - - - 8:04 6.9 10.2

- - - - 8:05 6.9 10.2

- - - - 8:06 6.9 10.2

- - - - 8:07 6.9 10.2

- - - - 8:08 7.0 10.1

- - - - 8:09 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:10 6.9 10.2

- - - - 8:11 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:12 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:13 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:14 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:15 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:16 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:17 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:18 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:19 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:20 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:21 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:22 7.0 10.1

- - - - 8:23 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:24 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:25 7.0 10.1

- - - - 8:26 7.0 10.1

- - - - 8:27 7.0 10.1

- - - - 8:28 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:29 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:30 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:31 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:32 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:33 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:34 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:35 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:36 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:37 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:38 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:39 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:40 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:41 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:42 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:43 6.9 10.1

- - - - 8:44 6.9 10.1

- - - - Raw Avg: 6.9 10.1

- - - - Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 6.90 10.26 - - - - Table 3.1.1 

### ETI Field DataClient: Tesoro Run: 2 Site: 1102 Start Time: 9:21 Date: 12/13/10 End Time: 10:20

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs 9:21 7.1 10.1

- - - - 9:22 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:23 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:24 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:25 6.9 10.3

- - - - 9:26 6.9 10.3

- - - - 9:27 6.9 10.3

- - - - 9:28 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:29 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:30 6.9 10.3

- - - - 9:31 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:32 6.9 10.2

- - - - 9:33 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:34 6.9 10.3

- - - - 9:35 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:36 6.9 10.3

- - - - 9:37 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:38 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:39 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:40 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:41 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:42 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:43 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:44 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:45 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:46 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:47 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:48 7.0 10.3

- - - - 9:49 6.9 10.3

- - - - 9:50 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:51 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:52 7.0 10.3

- - - - 9:53 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:54 7.0 10.3

- - - - 9:55 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:56 7.1 10.2

- - - - 9:57 7.0 10.2

- - - - 9:58 7.0 10.3

- - - - 9:59 7.0 10.2

- - - - 10:00 7.1 10.2

- - - - 10:01 7.1 10.2

- - - - 10:02 7.0 10.2

- - - - 10:03 7.1 10.2

- - - - 10:04 7.0 10.2

- - - - 10:05 7.0 10.2

- - - - 10:06 7.0 10.2

- - - - 10:07 7.0 10.3

- - - - 10:08 7.0 10.3

- - - - 10:09 7.1 10.2

- - - - 10:10 7.1 10.2

- - - - 10:11 7.0 10.2

- - - - 10:12 7.0 10.3

- - - - 10:13 7.0 10.2

- - - - 10:14 7.0 10.3

- - - - 10:15 7.0 10.3

- - - - 10:16 7.0 10.3

- - - - 10:17 7.0 10.3

- - - - 10:18 7.0 10.3

- - - - 10:19 7.0 10.3

- - - - 10:20 7.0 10.3

- - - - Raw Avg: 7.0 10.2

- - - - Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 7.00 10.36 - - - - Table 3.1.2 

### ETI Field DataClient: Tesoro Run: 3 Site: 1102 Start Time: 11:02 Date: 12/13/10 End Time: 12:01

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs 11:02 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:03 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:04 7.0 10.2

- - - - 11:05 7.0 10.2

- - - - 11:06 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:07 7.0 10.2

- - - - 11:08 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:09 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:10 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:11 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:12 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:13 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:14 7.0 10.2

- - - - 11:15 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:16 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:17 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:18 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:19 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:20 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:21 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:22 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:23 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:24 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:25 7.0 10.3

- - - - 11:26 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:27 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:28 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:29 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:30 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:31 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:32 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:33 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:34 6.9 10.4

- - - - 11:35 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:36 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:37 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:38 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:39 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:40 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:41 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:42 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:43 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:44 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:45 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:46 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:47 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:48 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:49 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:50 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:51 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:52 6.9 10.4

- - - - 11:53 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:54 6.8 10.4

- - - - 11:55 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:56 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:57 6.8 10.3

- - - - 11:58 6.9 10.3

- - - - 11:59 6.8 10.4

- - - - 12:00 6.8 10.4

- - - - 12:01 6.8 10.4

- - - - Raw Avg: 6.9 10.3

- - - - Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 6.90 10.47 - - - - Table 3.1.3 

### ETI Field Data

## METAL S TEST Flows Table 4 . 0 Flows and Moisture Data Sheet Table 4 . 1 Lab Data Table 4. 2 Fuel Data
Raw Data SheetsClient: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Unit: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1982

1 2 3 Run Start Time: 7:45 9:21 11:02 Run Finish Time: 8:49 10:25 12:06 **θ** Sample Time, minutes 64 64 64 Stack Shape (Circle or Rectangle): V m Dry Gas Meter Reading,dcf

.................. ...........INITIAL: 39.545 78.665 108.968 FINAL: 78.265 108.426 141.195 V m Volume of dry gas sampled, dcf 38.720 29.761 32.227 Y Meter box calibration factor 1.008 1.008 1.008 P bar Barometric pressure, inches Hg 30.02 30.03 30.02 P static Stack static pressure, inches H 2 O -0.07 -0.06 -0.06 **∆** H Differential meter press, inches H 2 O 1.0323 0.7174 0.8125 T m Meter temperature, degrees F 84.2 91.8 93.7 V lc Volume of H 2 O collected, ml 106.8 77.0 85.7 %O 2 Percent of oxygen in stack gas 6.90 7.00 6.90 %CO 2 Percent carbon dioxide in stack gas 10.26 10.36 10.47

C p Type-S pitot tube coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 Ave. square root of pitot readings, (inches H 2 O) 1/2 0.1700 0.1384 0.1482 T s Stack temperature, degrees F 390.8 384.1 382.8 D s Stack diameter, feet - CIRCLE 4.00 4.00 4.00 L s , W s Stack dimensions, feet - RECTANGLE

D n Nozzle diameter, inches 0.501 0.501 0.501 A n Nozzle area, ft 2 0.001369 0.001369 0.001369 Calculated Values:

V m(std) Meter corrected volume,dscf 38.091 28.861 31.142 V w(std) Volume of water vapor,dscf 5.036 3.631 4.041

B ws Fraction of H 2 O vapor 0.1168 0.1118 0.1149 B ws/sat Fraction of H 2 O vapor at saturated conditions 7.9243 7.4641 7.3804 %N 2 Percent nitrogen in stack gas 82.84 82.64 82.63 M d Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 29.92 29.94 29.95 M w Wet molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 28.53 28.61 28.58 A d Cross sectional area of stack, ft 2 12.57 12.57 12.57 P s Absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg 30.01 30.03 30.02 V s Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec 12.17 9.85 10.55 Q std Average stack volumetric flowrate, wscfm 5,713 4,664 5,002 Q std Average stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm 5,046 4,143 4,427

I Percent isokinetic sampling 108.4 100.0 101.0 Circle 

### Table 4.0 Flows and Moisture Field Data

Run Number:

avg P **∆**Client: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10 Location: Kapolei, HI Unit: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job Number: 10-1982

PARTICULATE LABORATORY DATA:
1 2 3 1.9839 1.9822 1.9792 1.9787 1.9758 1.9722 Blank acetone weight, g............................................. 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0042 0.0054 0.0060 0.3706 0.3662 0.3622 0.3696 0.3655 0.3605 0.0010 0.0007 0.0000 TOTAL FRONT HALF PARTICULATE, g: 0.0052 0.0061 0.0060

1 2 3 2.1443 2.0263 2.0772 1.8932 1.9716 1.9735 1.9733 1.8934 0.0608 0.0009 0.0077 0.1119 0.0519 0.0962 0
1.9848 1.9663 1.9492 1.9712 1.9819 1.9633 1.9470 1.9710 Blank methylene chloride weight, g.............................. 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0027 0.0028 0.0020 0.0002

V t

-Volume of NH 4 OH titrant, ml............................ 35.70 0.50 4.50
TOTAL BACK HALF PARTICULATE, g: 0.1146 0.0547 0.0982 Run Number: 

## Laboratory Data

Table 4.1

Run Number:

BACK HALF OF TRAIN FRONT HALF OF TRAIN

Filter Wt. Final weight, g:..................................................................... Tare weight, g:....................................................................... Weight gain, g:........................................................

Inorganic: Final weight, g:..................................................................... Tare weight, g:................................................................. Weight gain, g:................................................................ Probe/Nozzle Wash Residue Wt

. Final weight, g:..................................................................... Tare weight, g:....................................................................... Weight gain, g:........................................................

M c - Mass of NH 4 + added to sample, g:.................................

0.0608 0.1042 TOTAL PARTICULATE, g: 0.1198 Organic: Final weight, g:..................................................................... Tare weight, g:................................................................. Weight gain, g:....................................................................Unit: Tesoro Date: 12/13/10 Client: Kapolei, HI Fuel: Fuel Oil Location: Boiler Site: 1102 ETI Job No: 10-1982

Fuel Data/Ambient Conditions 1 2 3
Q f Fuel flow rate, scfm

- - - F BTU Fuel heating value - gross Btu/lb 19,688 19,688 19,688 F O2 O 2 F-factor, dscf/MMBtu 9,218 9,218 9,218 %O 2 Average percent of oxygen in stack gas 6.90 7.00 6.90 lb/hr CO 2 emissions from stack

- - - Calculated Values: 1 2 3
Q std , (Ave stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm)

- - - Fuel Flow (MMBtu/hr)

- - - 

## M-19 Stack Flow

Table 4.2
Run Number:

Run Number:

## PARTICULATE S TEST Gases: O 2 & 

### CO 2 

### Table 5 .0.0 - 5 .0.3 Calibration Data Sheets Table 5 .1.1 Run 1 Gases Table 5 .1.2 Run 2 Gas es Table 5 .1.3 Run 3 GasesClient: Tesoro ETI: Scott Chesnut Location: Kapolei, HI Dave Wagner Unit: Boiler #3 Paige Mendoza Site: SG1102 Date: 12/11/10 ETI Job No: 10-1968 12/12/10

Instrument Information: Instrument Channel Color Model O 2 - - ZRE CO 2 - - ZRE SO 2 - - - NO x - - - CO

- - - HCs

- - - Recorders:

- - -
Calibration Information: Instrument Units Zero Span Range Gas Cyl. No. O 2 % N 2 12.40 21.30 CC56348 O 2 % N 2 21.3 21.30 CC231540 CO 2 % N 2 12.5 21.00 CC56348 CO 2 % N 2 21 21.00 CC231540 SO 2 ppmv - - - - SO 2 ppmv - - - - NO x ppmv - - - - NO x ppmv - - - - CO ppmv - - - - CO ppmv - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - - HCs ppmv - - - - - -

- - -

- Gas Flow (L/min) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

- - -

- -

- -

- -

- CAI A0A6534T

- 

## Calibration Data

Table 5.0.0
Make Serial No. CAI A0A6534TClient: Tesoro Date: 12/11/10 Location: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 Mid-Range Gas 12.40 12.40 High-Range Gas 21.30 21.38 40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 12.4

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.05% Upscale Gas 12.40 12.38 0.02 0.09%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.19% 0.14% Upscale Gas 12.40 12.38 0.02 0.00 0.09% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.09% 0.09% Upscale Gas 12.40 12.28 0.12 0.10 0.56% 0.47%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05% 0.05% Upscale Gas 12.40 12.25 0.15 0.03 0.70% 0.14% Pre

1
2
3 0.00 

### Table 5.0.1 O 2 

### Analyzer Calibration Data Direct Calibration Mode 3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal) Difference from Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration

Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.08 0.38%Client: Tesoro Date: 12/11/10 Location: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

Cylinder

Value (ppmdv) Calibration Response (ppmdv) Zero Gas 0.00 0.00 Mid-Range Gas 12.50 12.50 High-Range Gas 21.00 21.10 40 CFR 60 Method 3A-13.0 Analyzer calibration error ≤2.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference System Bias must be ≤5.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Drift must be ≤3.0% of calibration span or 0.5% absolute difference Calibration Span = High-Range Gas Cylinder Value Upscale Gas = Mid 12.5

System Bias and Calibration Drift Assessments Run Direct - System Difference Pre - Post System Response System Bias Calibration Drift Zero Gas 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.19% Upscale Gas 12.50 12.41 0.09 0.43%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.29% 0.10% Upscale Gas 12.50 12.42 0.08 0.01 0.38% 0.05%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.24% 0.05% Upscale Gas 12.50 12.42 0.08 0.00 0.38% 0.00%

Zero Gas 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.29% 0.05% Upscale Gas 12.50 12.43 0.07 0.01 0.33% 0.05% Pre

1
2
3 0.00 

### Table 5.0.2 CO 2 

### Analyzer Calibration Data Direct Calibration Mode 3-Point Linearity Check (Internal Cal) Difference from Cylinder Value

Analyzer Calibration

Response (ppmdv) Direct System Difference (% of Calibration Span) 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.10 0.48%Client: Tesoro Run: 1 Site: SG1102 Start Time: 16:30 Date: 12/11/10 End Time: 19:30

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Raw Avg: 6.3 10.6

- - - - Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 6.30 10.67 - - - - 

## ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.1Client: Tesoro Run: 2 Site: SG1102 Start Time: 8:45 Date: 12/12/10 End Time: 11:45

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Raw Avg: 6.4 10.5

- - - - Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 6.42 10.56 - - - - 

## ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.2Client: Tesoro Run: 2 Site: SG1102 Start Time: 8:45 Date: 12/12/10 End Time: 11:45

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Raw Avg: 6.4 10.5

- - - - Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 6.42 10.56 - - - - 

## ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.2Client: Tesoro Run: 3 Site: SG1102 Start Time: 12:26 Date: 12/12/10 End Time: 15:26

Source: Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Component: O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Units: % % ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv ppmdv Raw Emission Data 3-hr Average: Measurement Time O 2 CO 2 SO 2 NO x CO HCs Raw Avg: 6.7 10.2

- - - - Bias Corrected Emissions: Average: 6.77 10.25 - - - - 

## ETI Field Data

Table 5.1.3

## PARTICULATE S TEST Flows Table 6 . 0 Flows and Moisture Data Sheet Table 6 . 1 Lab Data

Raw Data SheetsClient: Tesoro Date: 12/11/10 City: Kapolei, HI 12/12/10 Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

1 2 3 12/11/10 12/12/10 12/12/10 START TIME:............................................... 16:30 7:53 11:25 END TIME..................................................... 19:42 11:05 14:37 **θ** Sample Time, minutes 192 192 192 Stack Shape (Circle or Rectangle): Circle V m Volume of dry gas sampled, cf 50.722 92.524 89.519 Y Meter box calibration factor 1.008 1.008 1.008 P bar Barometric pressure, inches Hg 29.93 29.99 29.99 P static Stack static pressure, inches H 2 O -0.06 -0.05 -0.06 **∆** H Differential meter press, inches H 2 O 0.2855 0.7574 0.6918 T m Meter temperature, degrees F 84.6 90.5 98.0 V lc Volume of H 2 O collected, ml 129.5 198.7 203.0 %O 2 Percent of oxygen in stack gas 6.30 6.42 6.77 %CO 2 Percent carbon dioxide in stack gas 10.67 10.56 10.25

C p Type-S pitot tube coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 Ave. square root of pitot readings, (inches H 2 O) 1/2 0.1501 0.1529 0.1456 T s Stack temperature, degrees F 385.8 386.1 383.8 D s Stack diameter, feet - CIRCLE 4.00 4.00 4.00 L s , W s Stack dimensions, feet - RECTANGLE NA NA NA

D n Nozzle diameter, inches 0.385 0.484 0.484 A n Nozzle area, ft 2 0.000808 0.001278 0.001278 Calculated Values: V m(std) Meter corrected volume,dscf 49.621 89.828 85.729 V w(std) Volume of water vapor,dscf 6.11 9.37 9.57

B ws Fraction of H 2 O vapor 0.1096 0.0945 0.1004 %N 2 Percent nitrogen in stack gas 83.03 83.02 82.98 M d Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 29.96 29.95 29.91 M w Wet molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 28.65 28.82 28.71 A d Cross sectional area of stack, ft 2 12.57 12.57 12.57 P s Absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg 29.93 29.99 29.99 V s Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec 10.71 10.86 10.35 Q std Average stack volumetric flowrate, dscfm 4,491 4,639 4,404

I Percent isokinetic sampling 90 99 100 

## Flows and Moisture Field Data

Table 6.0
Run Number

avg P **∆**Client: Tesoro Date: 12/11/10 City: Kapolei, HI Site: SG1102 ETI Job No: 10-1968

1 2 3 Sample 10.40 14.80 10.20 Blank 0.18 0.18 0.18 Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60 Total, **μ** g 10.22 14.62 10.02 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.206 0.163 0.117 Sample 0.00 0.00 0.00 Blank 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total, **μ** g 0.15 0.15 0.15 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.00302 0.00167 0.00175 Sample 2.00 2.00 2.10 Blank 0.35 0.35 0.35 Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total, **μ** g 1.65 1.65 1.75 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.03325 0.01837 0.02041 Sample 1.90 5.00 2.50 Blank 0.70 0.70 0.70 Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60 Total, **μ** g 1.20 4.30 1.80 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.0242 0.0479 0.0210 Sample 2.90 13.40 0.88 Blank 0.34 0.34 0.34 Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total, **μ** g 2.56 13.06 0.54 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.0516 0.1454 0.0063 Sample 1.20 1.60 1.60 Blank 0.32 0.32 0.32 Reporting Limit 0.30 0.30 0.30 Total, **μ** g 0.88 1.28 1.28 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 0.01773 0.01425 0.01493 Sample 55.2 88.1 57.8 Blank 0.41 0.41 0.41 Reporting Limit 0.60 0.60 0.60 Total, **μ** g 54.79 87.69 57.39 Total, **μ** g/ft 3 1.104 0.976 0.669 results ≤ 0 reported as 1/2 the detection limit Beryllium, **μ** g

Arsenic, **μ** g

Nickel, **μ** g 

## Lab Data Method 29 Metals Testing

Table 6.1

Manganese, **μ** g Run Number

Lead, **μ** g Chromium, **μ** g Cadmium, **μ** g

## TEST AMERICA LAB REP ORT

## Quality Assurance/Quality Control

ETI QA Document Hand Calculations Gas Cer tifications Meter Calibrations

### API/NPRA Comments on Non

- Continental Liquids Subcategory July 15, 2011 ATTACHMENT 4 (see Excel Spreadsheet in July 15, 2011 email from Matt Todd)

### API/NPRA Comments on Non

- Continental Liquids Subcategory July 15, 2011 ATTACHMENT 5

### API/NPRA Comments on Non

- Continental Liquids Subcategory July 15, 2011 ATTACHMENT 6