alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

              STATEMENT DETAILING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

       For the year ended July 31, 2007 per audited Financial Statements:

    - net income (loss)                                      ($2,526,524)

Weighted Average Number of Shares
Outstanding Calculated as follows:              13,094,288
                                                ==========

                            WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF SHARES   WEIGHT   NUMBER OF SHARES
12,818,189          0.814      10,430,143
14,318,189          0.186       2,664,145
                               ----------
                               13,094,288

Income (Loss) Per Share                                           ($0.19)

For the year ended July 31, 2006 per audited Financial Statements:

    - net income (loss)                                      $(3,926,921)

Weighted Average Number of Shares
Outstanding Calculated as follows:              12,818,189
                                                ==========

                            WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF SHARES   WEIGHT   NUMBER OF SHARES
12,818,189           1.00      12,818,189
                               ----------
                               12,818,189

Income (Loss) Per Share                                          $($0.31)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 24, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 24, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0079. AUTO ONE PLUS et al. v. CYNTHIA GRAHAM .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2015A3025
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 734 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 734

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 18, 2014.
Whereas James Foley and Steven Sotloff were highly respected journalists whose 
        integrity and dedication were a credit to their profession;
Whereas James Foley and Steven Sotloff embodied the spirit of our Nation's First 
        Amendment liberties, including the freedom of the press;
Whereas James Foley and Steven Sotloff made significant contributions to our 
        Nation through their courageous reporting of events in Libya, Syria, and 
        elsewhere; and
Whereas the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is a terrorist 
        organization responsible for committing barbaric acts against United 
        States citizens, religious and ethnic minorities, and those who do not 
        subscribe to ISIL's depraved, violent, and oppressive ideology: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) strongly condemns the terrorist acts of ISIL, including the 
        barbaric and deplorable murders of James Foley and Steven Sotloff;
            (2) salutes James Foley and Steven Sotloff for their unwavering and 
        courageous pursuit of journalistic excellence under the most difficult 
        and dangerous of conditions;
            (3) mourns the deaths of James Foley and Steven Sotloff; and
            (4) offers condolences to the families, friends, and loved ones of 
        James Foley and Steven Sotloff.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2023035EN.01004902.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 December 2022 — CCPL and Others v Commission

(Case T-130/21) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Retail food packaging - Decision adjusting the amount of a fine - Calculation of the fine - Imputability of unlawful conduct - 2006 Guidelines on the method for setting fines - Upper limit of the fine - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Ability to pay)

(2023/C 35/57)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: CCPL — Consorzio Cooperative di Produzione e Lavoro SC (Reggio Emilia, Italy), Coopbox Group SpA (Bibbiano, Italy), Coopbox Eastern s.r.o. (Nové Mesto nad Váhom, Slovakia) (represented by: E. Cucchiara and E. Rocchi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and T. Baumé, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 8940 final of 17 December 2020 adjusting the amount of the fines imposed by Commission Decision C(2015) 4336 final of 24 June 2015 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39563 — Retail Food Packaging).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders CCPL — Consorzio Cooperative di Produzione e Lavoro SC, Coopbox Group SpA and Coopbox Eastern s.r.o. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders CCPL — Consorzio Cooperative di Produzione e Lavoro SC, Coopbox Group SpA and Coopbox Eastern s.r.o. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.

---
SERVE D SEPTEMBE R 6 , 201 1 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C 

## romiiO K D-ERATIO I 

### 1 A' < 2 0 INTH EMATTE RO F SKYWES T AIRLINE S FA A DOCKE T NO
. [T O B EASSIGNED ]

(Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO
. FAA-2011-048 6
AMENDE D PROCEDURA LORDE R Paragrap h# 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follow s : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O no r befor e Novembe r

4,2011 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discovery including , but

no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio n request s and/o r

interrogatories
. I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e adiscovery disput e the y shal l submi t

th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio ni natimel y manner.. .

)odwi n U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No
. FAA-2011-048 6 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2Wl000 *

ONECOP Y Tod dC
. Emerson , Respondent' s Representativ e Directo r - Governmen t

an dLega l Affair s SkyWes t Airline s 44 4 Sout hRive r Roa d St
. George , U T 8479 0 TEL : 435-634-353 0 FAX : 435-634-350 5 Jeffrey M
. Harper , Complaincmt' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Northwes t

Mountai nRegion , ANM- 7 Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W
. Renton,W A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-216 1 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodvwn , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i npersonorby ejqiedite

dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
# C_2022198EN.01005002.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/50

---

Order of the General Court of 1 March 2022 — Agreiter and Others v Commission

(Case T-632/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Amendment of the conditional marketing authorisation for Spikevax, a medicinal product for human use - COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified) - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 198/74)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Karin Agreiter (Merano, Italy) and the 33 other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex to the order (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 of the TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 5686 final of 23 July 2021 amending the conditional marketing authorisation for ‘Spikevax’ — COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified), a medicinal product for human use granted by Implementing Decision C(2021) 94 final of 6 January 2021.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Moderna Biotech Spain SL. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Moderna Biotech Spain SL.

| 3. | Ms Karin Agreiter and the other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Ms Karin Agreiter and the other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex shall pay the costs.

| 4. | Moderna Biotech Spain shall bear its own costs related to the application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Moderna Biotech Spain shall bear its own costs related to the application for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.

---
| Subsidiary                     |   | Jurisdiction |   | Ownership                                                                                                                       |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Hwareh.com,      Inc.          |   | Delaware     |   | 100%      owned by HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.                                                                                    |
|                           |   |         |   |                                                                                                                            |
| Ion      Networks Holding N.V. |   | Belgium      |   | 799      shares are owned by HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.One      share is owned by Stephen Gray, the Company’s former  CEO. |
|                           |   |         |   |                                                                                                                            |
| Ion      Networks, N.V.        |   | Belgium      |   | 513      shares are owned by Ion Networks Holding N.V.One      share is owned by Stephen Gray, the Company’s former  CEO. |

----
# C_2023007EN.01002901.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — WP and Others v Commission

(Case T-604/21) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Pensions - Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the EU - Transfer to the EU scheme - Additional years of pensionable service - Application for restitution of the amount of transferred national pension rights - Dismissal of application - ‘Minimum subsistence figure’ rule - Undue enrichment - Equal treatment)

(2023/C 7/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: WP, WQ, WR (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicants, as successors in title to A, seek annulment of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the European Commission of 16 November 2020 dismissing the application for restitution of the national pension rights acquired by A before his death and transferred to the pension scheme of the EU institutions and annulment of Commission Decision of 15 June 2021 rejecting the complaint lodged by A under Article 90 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders WP, WQ and WR to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders WP, WQ and WR to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 452, 8.11.2021.

---
Document

Exhibit 10.27
						
	
	Amendment No. 1 to Underwriting Agreement between North American Title Insurance Company and CalAtlantic Entities



			
	


Whereas, North American Title Insurance Company, a California corporation ("North American") and, CalAtlantic Title Agency, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, CalAtlantic Title, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("Title Agency") made and entered into an Underwriting Agreement, dated August 7, 2020 ("Agreement"); and
Whereas, North American and Title Agency desire to amend the Agreement.
Now therefore, for good and valuable consideration, North American and Title Agency agree to modify and amend the Agreement, effective      9/21/2020        (the “Effective Date”), as follows:
1.    Title Agency has advised North American that it has changed its name from CalAtlantic Title, Inc. to Lennar Title, Inc. effective September 21, 2020. Therefore, North American and Title Agency agree that the term “Title Agency” shall now refer to Lennar Title, Inc., a Maryland corporation.
2.    Title Agency has advised North American that it has changed its name from CalAtlantic Title Agency, LLC to Lennar Title, LLC effective September 21, 2020. Therefore, North American and Title Agency agree that the term “Title Agency” shall now refer to Lennar Title, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company.
The provisions of this Amendment shall control over any conflicting or inconsistent provisions set forth in the Agreement. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect other than as modified herein. All capitalized words and phrases contained in this Amendment shall have the same meaning as is assigned to them in the Agreement unless a new meaning is assigned in this Amendment.
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, which, when assembled, will be deemed to be an original copy of this Amendment and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly and properly executed by their respective officers having full authority to do so, to be effective as of the Effective Date.
															
	LENNAR TITLE, INC.
a Maryland corporation 
f/k/a CalAtlantic Title, Inc.
		LENNAR TITLE, LLC
a North Carolina limited liability company
f/k/a CalAtlantic Title Agency, LLC

					
	By:	/s/ Cristina Pardo		By:	/s/ Cristina Pardo
		Cristina Pardo			Cristina Pardo
	Its:	Executive Vice President		Its:	Executive Vice President


						
	NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	By:	/s/ Emilio Fernandez
		Emilio Fernandez
	Its:	President


			
	NATIC AGENCY ADMIN ONLY
	
	System records updated on:
9/21/2020
	By:
/s/ Beatrix Ciprian



Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2509
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2531
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               52
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2531
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15118
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  13481
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13481
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    167
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13648
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   164.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   164.36
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022119EN.01004101.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — CNH Industrial v EUIPO (CROPXPLORER)

(Case T-301/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark CROPXPLORER - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 119/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CNH Industrial NV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: L. Axel Karnøe Søndergaard, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2021 (Case R 387/2021-5), relating to an application for registration of the word sign CROPXPLORER as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders CNH Industrial NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders CNH Industrial NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 26.7.2021.

---
FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS October 1,2015 ABELACOSTA, CLERK No. PD-1189-14
In The Court ofCriminalAppeals OfThe State ofTexas Austin, Texas PD-1189-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 9/30/2015 6:22:55 PM Accepted 10/1/2015 9:10:04 AM ABEL ACOSTA r CLERK 

# / $> \

FRANCHESKA V. JAGANATHAN, Appellant

vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

### Now comes Francheska Jaganathan, Appellant in Cause Number No. PD-1189-14 before 

### this Court, and asks this Court to permit the extension oftime to file her Motion for Rehearing, pursuantto Texas Rule ofAppellate Procedure 79.6, and for good cause shows the following: 1. Appellant hereby requests leave ofthe Court to extend the time to file the Motion 

### for Rehearing. The currentdeadline is October 1,2015. No previous extensionsto file the Motion for Rehearing have been requested or granted. 

### 2. Undersigned counsel was preparing for trial in an attempted capital murder case that was set for trial this weekbefore being continued at the last minute. Undersigned counsel has 

### spent significanttime preparing for this trial and is unable to completethe Motion forRehearing in the above matter by the deadline. 

### 3. Additionally, counsel was in felony trial in Jefferson County District Court during most of the week of September 14, 2015. These two previous engagements in addition to 

# ELECTRONIC RECORD

### numerous unexpected engagements this week detracted a significant amount of time from preparing the Motion. 

### 4. Undersigned counsel respectfully requests a 15 day extension ofthe deadline.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this Court grant this Motion for Extension of Time to File the Motion for Rehearing and for such other and further reliefas the Court may deem appropriate. Respectfully submitted, THE GERTZ LAW FIRM 2630 Liberty St. Beaumont, Texas 77702 Tel: (409) 833-6400 Fax:(409) 833-6401


### I si Ryan W. Gertz By: Ryan W. Gertz State Bar No. 24048489 Attorney for Francheska Jaganathan

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### This is to certify that on September 30, 2015, a true and correct copy ofthe above and 

### foregoing document was served on the following by facsimile:
Chambers County DistrictAttorney's Office 404 Washington St. Anahuac, TX 77514 Via Facsimile

- (409) 267-4453
#### Lessee of FASSIT *vs.*RICHARD & CLARK.

After recovery in ejectment the plaintiff takes possession at his peril; the verdict being general.

The plaintiff recovered an undivided half of one tract of land, and a fourth of another, being part of the premises mentioned in the declaration. The question arose how he should take the verdict; and, after conversation with the court and bar, he entered it generally. He takes possession at his peril.

*Bates,*for plaintiff

*Frame,*for defendants.
#### Elton ADAIR v. Marvin HOLDEN.

No. 45379.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 26, 1969.

Wilroy, Wilroy & Hagan, Hernando, for appellant.

Roy E. Johnson, David Adams, Senato-bia, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.