Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 140 / Friday, July 20, 2018 / Notices 34557 

landowners/tenants when HCIS 

preventative or corrective maintenance 

becomes necessary to ensure 

uninterrupted Intercontinental Ballistic 

Missile command and control 

capability. The information collection 

requirement is necessary to report 

changes in ownership/lease 

information, conditions of missile cable 

route and associated appurtenances, and 

projected building/excavation projects. 

The information collected is used to 

ensure system integrity and to maintain 

a close contact public relations program 

with involved personnel and agencies. 

Affected Public: Business or other for 

profit; Not-for-profit institutions. 

Annual Burden Hours: 1,125. 

Number of Respondents: 4,500. 

Responses per Respondent: 1. 

Annual Responses: 4,500. 

Average Burden per Response: 15 

mins. 

Frequency: On Occasion. 

Dated: July 17, 2018. 

Shelly E. Finke, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15515 Filed 7–19–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Special Communication and Contact 

Control Measures 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice; comment request. 

SUMMARY: This directive establishes the 

Special Communications and Contacts 

Control Measures (SCCCM) program to 

provide specific limitations on the 

communications and contacts of Army 

Corrections Command (ACC) prisoners 

to protect national security, public 

safety, the good order, discipline and 

correctional mission of the Army 

Corrections System (ACS) facilities from 

acts of violence or terrorism. 

DATES: Comments are due by August 20, 

2018. 

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to: Office of 

the Provost Marshal General (Gregory 

W. Limberis), 2800 Army Pentagon, 

Washington, DC 20310. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Gregory Stroebel, (703) 545–5935. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

(a) Upon direction of the Assistant 

Secretary of the Army for Manpower 

and Reserve Affairs (ASA (M&RA)), the 

Commander, ACC, may authorize the 

Commander of an ACS Facility to 

implement SCCCM that are reasonably 

necessary to protect persons against the 

risk of death or serious bodily injury. 

These procedures may be implemented 

upon written notification to the 

Commander, ACC, by the ASA (M&RA), 

that there is a substantial risk that a 

prisoner’s communications or contacts 

with persons could result in death or 

serious bodily injury to persons or 

substantial damage to property that 

would entail the risk of death or serious 

bodily injury to persons. These SCCCM 

ordinarily may include housing the 

prisoner in administrative segregation 

and/or limiting certain conditions of 

confinement, including, but not limited 

to, correspondence, visiting, interviews 

with representatives of the news media, 

and use of the telephone, as is 

reasonably necessary to protect persons 

against the risk of death or serious 

bodily injury. The authority of the 

Commander, ACC under this paragraph 

may not be delegated. 

(b) Designated ACS facility staff shall 

provide to the affected prisoner, as soon 

as practicable, written notification of the 

restrictions imposed and the basis for 

the restrictions. The notice’s statement 

as to the basis may be limited in the 

interest of prison security or safety, to 

protect against acts of violence or 

terrorism that could result in death or 

serious bodily injury to persons, or 

substantial damage to property that 

would entail the risk of death or serious 

bodily injury to persons. The prisoner 

shall sign for and receive a copy of the 

notification. The prisoner’s attorney(s) 

of record shall also provide a written 

acknowledgement of receipt of the 

notice and an agreement to abide by the 

SCCCM. 

(c) Initial placement of a prisoner in 

administrative segregation and/or any 

limitation of the prisoner’s conditions of 

confinement in accordance with 

paragraph (a) of this section may be 

imposed for up to 120 days or, with the 

approval of the ASA (M&RA), a longer 

period of time not to exceed one year. 

Special restrictions imposed in 

accordance with paragraph (a) of this 

section may be extended thereafter by 

the Commander, ACC, in increments not 

to exceed one year, upon receipt by the 

Commander, ACC of an additional 

written notification from the ASA 

(M&RA) that there continues to be a 

substantial risk that the prisoner’s 

communications or contacts with other 

persons could result in death or serious 

bodily injury to persons or substantial 

damage to property that would entail 

the risk of death or serious bodily injury 

to persons. The authority of the 

Commander, ACC under this paragraph 

may not be delegated. 

(d) In any case where the Secretary of 

the Army specifically so orders, based 

on information from the Provost 

Marshal General/Commanding General, 

United States Army Criminal 

Investigation Command (USACIDC) that 

reasonable suspicion exists to believe 

that a particular prisoner may use 

communications with attorneys or their 

agents to solicit, further, or otherwise 

facilitate acts of terrorism, the 

Commander, ACC, shall, in addition to 

the SCCCM imposed under paragraph 

(a) of this section, provide appropriate 

procedures for the monitoring or review 

of communications between that 

prisoner and attorneys or attorneys’ 

agents who are traditionally covered by 

the attorney-client privilege, for the 

purpose of deterring future acts of 

terrorism. 

(1) The certification by the Secretary 

of the Army under this paragraph (d) 

shall be in addition to any findings or 

determinations relating to the need for 

the imposition of other SCCCM as 

provided in paragraph (a) of this 

section, but may be incorporated into 

the same document. 

(2) Except in the case of prior court 

authorization, the Commander, ACC, 

shall provide written notice to the 

prisoner and to the attorneys involved 

prior to the initiation of any such 

monitoring or review authorized under 

this paragraph (d). The notice shall 

explain: 

(i) That, notwithstanding the 

provisions of DoDI 1325.07, AR 190–47, 

or other rules, all communications 

between the prisoner and attorneys may 

be monitored, to the extent determined 

to be reasonably necessary for the 

purpose of deterring future acts of 

terrorism; 

(ii) That communications between the 

prisoner and attorneys or their agents 

are not protected by the attorney-client 

privilege if they would facilitate 

criminal acts or a conspiracy to commit 

criminal acts, or if those 

communications are not related to the 

seeking or providing of legal advice. 

(3) The Commander, ACC, with the 

concurrence of the Judge Advocate 

General and the Army General Counsel, 

shall employ appropriate procedures to 

ensure that all attorney-client 

communications are reviewed for 

privilege claims and that any properly 

privileged materials (including, but not 

limited to, recordings of privileged 

communications) are not retained 

during the course of the monitoring. To 

protect the attorney-client privilege and 

to ensure that the investigation or 

judicial proceeding is not compromised 

by exposure to privileged material 

relating to the investigation, judicial 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
34558 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 140 / Friday, July 20, 2018 / Notices 

proceeding or to defense strategy, a 

privilege team shall be designated by 

the Judge Advocate General, consisting 

of individuals not involved in the 

underlying investigation or judicial 

proceeding. The monitoring shall be 

conducted pursuant to procedures 

designed to minimize the intrusion into 

privileged material or conversations. 

Except in cases where the person in 

charge of the privilege team determines 

that the acts of terrorism are imminent, 

the privilege team shall not disclose any 

information unless and until such 

disclosure has been approved by a 

federal or military judge presiding over 

the legal matter for which attorneys or 

their agents represent the particular 

prisoner. 

(e) The affected prisoner may seek 

review of any specific limitation on 

communications or contacts imposed 

pursuant to this directive in accordance 

with AR 190–47, paragraph 10–14. The 

Commander, ACC will act on any 

request for review. 

The Provost Marshal General is the 

proponent for this policy and will 

incorporate the provisions of this 

directive into AR 190–47 as soon as 

possible. This directive will be 

rescinded upon publication of the 

revised regulation. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15425 Filed 7–19–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–03–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army, Corps of 

Engineers 

Availability of the Final Environmental 

Impact Statement for the Northern 

Integrated Supply Project, Larimer and 

Weld Counties, Colorado 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers (Corps) Omaha District has 

prepared a Final Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) to analyze the direct, 

indirect, and cumulative effects of a 

water supply project called the Northern 

Integrated Supply Project (NISP or 

Project) in Larimer and Weld Counties, 

CO. The purpose of NISP is to provide 

the Participants, a group of 15 water 

providers and communities, with 

approximately 40,000 acre-feet (AF) per 

year of new, reliable municipal water 

supply through a regional project 

coordinated by the Northern Colorado 

Water Conservancy District (Northern 

Water). NISP would result in direct 

impacts to jurisdictional waters of the 

U.S., including wetlands. The 

placement of fill material into waters of 

the U.S. requires authorization from the 

Corps under Section 404 of the Clean 

Water Act. Northern Water is the 

applicant for the Section 404 permit, 

acting on behalf of the Participants. In 

accordance with Section 176 of the 

Clean Air Act a Draft General 

Conformity Determination has been 

prepared for the Project. 

DATES: Written comments on the Final 

EIS and the Draft General Conformity 

Determination will be accepted on or 

before September 4, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments 

regarding NISP, the Final EIS, and the 

Draft General Conformity Determination 

to John Urbanic, NISP EIS Project 

Manager, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 

Omaha District, Denver Regulatory 

Office, 9307 South Wadsworth 

Boulevard, Littleton, CO 80128, or by 

email to nisp.eis@usace.army.mil. 

Requests to be placed on or be removed 

from the NISP mailing list should also 

be sent to this address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Urbanic, NISP EIS Project Manager, 

telephone 303–979–4120, fax at 303– 

979–0602, or email at nisp.eis@

usace.army.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Final 

EIS was prepared in accordance with 

the National Environmental Policy Act 

of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the 

Corps’ regulations for NEPA 

implementation (33 Code of Federal 

Regulations [CFR] Parts 230 and 325, 

Appendix B). The Corps, Omaha 

District, Denver Regulatory Office is the 

lead federal agency responsible for the 

Final EIS. Information contained in the 

EIS serves as the basis for a decision 

regarding issuance of a Section 404 

Permit. It also provides information for 

local and state agencies that have 

jurisdictional responsibility for affected 

resources. 

The Corps released a Draft EIS for 

NISP on April 30, 2008 and a 

Supplemental Draft EIS on June 19, 

2015. The Corps has considered the 

comments received on the Draft and 

Supplemental Draft EIS in the 

development of the Final EIS. The 

purpose of the Final EIS is to provide 

decision-makers and the public with 

information pertaining to the Project, 

disclose environmental impacts of the 

alternatives, and identify mitigation 

measures to reduce impacts. In NISP, 

Northern Water proposes to construct 

Glade Reservoir with a total storage 

capacity of approximately 170,000 AF. 

The Project would also involve 

rehabilitating the existing diversion and 

intake structure in the Cache la Poudre 

River as well as constructing a new 

diversion and intake structure, forebay, 

pumping facility, and outlet channel. 

Glade Reservoir would inundate 

approximately 7 miles of U.S. Highway 

287 and a section of the Munroe (North 

Poudre Supply) Canal, requiring a 

relocation of the highway and the canal. 

Northern Water also proposes to 

construct the South Platte Water 

Conservation Project (SPWCP) which 

includes Upper Galeton Reservoir with 

a total storage capacity of approximately 

45,624 AF. The SPWCP includes the 

construction of a new diversion and 

intake structure in the South Platte 

River, pumping facilities, and new 

pipelines for Upper Galeton Reservoir. 

This FEIS evaluates the effects of the 

following alternatives to NISP: 

Alternative 1—No Action Alternative; 

Alternative 2M—Glade Reservoir with 

modified conveyance and the South 

Platte Water Conservation Project 

(Applicant’s Preferred Alternative); 

Alternative 2—Glade Reservoir and the 

South Platte Water Conservation Project; 

Alternative 3—Cactus Hill Reservoir, 

Poudre Valley Canal Diversion, and the 

South Platte Water Conservation Project; 

and Alternative 4—Cactus Hill 

Reservoir, with multiple diversion 

locations, and the South Platte Water 

Conservation Project. 

In accordance with Section 176 of the 

Clean Air Act and the Environmental 

Protection Agency’s general conformity 

regulations (40 CFR part 93, subpart B), 

a Draft General Conformity 

Determination has been prepared for the 

Project. Section 176 of the Clean Air Act 

requires federal agencies to ensure that 

their actions conform to applicable 

implementation plans for achieving and 

maintaining the National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards for criteria air 

pollutants. The Corps has prepared a 

Draft Conformity Determination for the 

Project and has included it in Chapter 

4.14.7 of the Final EIS. The Draft 

General Conformity Determination finds 

that all alternatives of the Project 

conform with the State Implementation 

Plan. 

The U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region VIII, U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land 

Management, Colorado Department of 

Transportation, Colorado Department of 

Natural Resources, Colorado 

Department of Public Health and 

Environment, and Larimer County 

participated as cooperating agencies in 

the development of the Final EIS. 

Copies of the Final EIS will be 

available for review at: 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES