alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022207EN.01003901.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Kalita and Haas v EUIPO — Kitzbühel Tourismus (Representation of two animals)

(Case T-206/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals - Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 207/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Oliver Kalita (Jochberg, Austria), Christian Haas (Kitzbühel, Austria) (represented by: G. Donath, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Graul and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Kitzbühel Tourismus, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (Kitzbühel) (represented by: M. Horak, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 February 2021 (Case R 863/2020-1), relating to opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, Kitzbühel Tourismus and, on the other, Mr Kalita and Mr Haas.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 February 2021 (Case R 863/2021-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 February 2021 (Case R 863/2021-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Mr Oliver Kalita and Mr Christian Haas; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Mr Oliver Kalita and Mr Christian Haas;

| 3. | Orders Kitzbühel Tourismus, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Mr Kalita and Mr Haas. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Kitzbühel Tourismus, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Mr Kalita and Mr Haas.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.

---
---

Exhibit
13.2



CERTIFICATION



The certification set forth below
is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Israel Chemicals Ltd. on Form 20-F (the “Report”) for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Kobi Altman, Chief Financial
Officer of Israel Chemicals Ltd., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
    Act; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of Israel Chemicals Ltd.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | March 16, 2016
|----- | --------------





|/s/ Kobi Altman                                     
|----------------------------------------------------
|Kobi Altman
        
        Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51548 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JON MARK WHITAKER, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-60-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jon Mark Whitaker appeals his conviction for mail fraud and the resulting order to pay restitution in the amount of $450,028.29. Whitaker argues that the Government failed to establish federal jurisdiction because the mailing of insufficient funds checks to suppliers and subcontractors did not further his scheme to defraud. He also contends that the district court erred in ordering restitution at an amount higher than the statutory maximum fine. The Government responds byNo. 06-51548 -2- seeking to enforce Whitaker’s appeal waiver and contends that his challenge to the amount of restitution is barred from review. Whitaker’s argument that the Government failed to establish federal jurisdiction is without merit. The Government alleged that Whitaker knowingly mailed insufficient funds checks to suppliers and subcontractors defrauding them of their services and delaying the discontinuation of their work so as to continue to perpetrate fraud on the home buyers. The mailings were integral to the fraud and without them Whitaker’s scheme “would have come to an abrupt halt.” Schmuck v. United States , 489 U.S. 705, 712 (1989). Whitaker’s appeal waiver was knowing and voluntary, and therefore, the waiver is enforced. See United States v. Melancon , 972 F.2d 566, 567-68 (5th Cir. 1992). As such, we do not address the merits of Whitaker’s challenge to the amount of restitution. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart-Tek Solutions
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: November 23, 2009                             | 
|--------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Perry
      Law                                 | 
|Perry Law                                           | 
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer | 

---
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

The Board of Directors 

 

Analytical Surveys, Inc.: 

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-53950, No. 33-59940 and No. 333-47365) on Form S-8 of Analytical Surveys, Inc. of our report dated December 22, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of AnalyticalSurveys, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedSeptember 30, 2003, which report appears in the September 30, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K on Analytical Surveys, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to a change in the Company’s method of accounting for goodwill in 2002. 

 

Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered significant operating losses in 2003 and 2002 anddoes not currently have any external financing in place to fund working capital and debt requirements, which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do notinclude any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 

 

**KPMG LLP**

 

San Antonio, Texas 

December 29, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 136 (Monday, July 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP17-495-000; CP17-494-000]


Jordan Cove Energy Project, L.P., Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, 
L.P.; Notice of Meeting

    The environmental staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) along with representatives of the U.S. Forest Service, 
Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will 
meet with representatives of the Yurok Tribe to discuss the proposed 
Jordan Cove LNG and Pacific Connector Pipeline Projects. The meeting 
will be held at the location and time listed below:

Yurok Tribe--Klamath Administrative Office, 190 Klamath Boulevard, 
Klamath, CA 95548, Phone: (707) 482-1350, Wednesday, July 18, 2018, 
10:00 a.m. PDT

    Members of the public and intervenors in the referenced proceeding 
may attend and observe this meeting; however, participation will be 
limited to tribal representatives and agency personnel. If tribal 
representatives decide to disclose information about a specific 
location which could create a risk or harm to an archeological site or 
Native American cultural resource, the public will be excused for that 
portion of the meeting. A summary of the meeting will be entered into 
the Commission's administrative record.
    If you plan to attend this meeting, please contact Mr. John 
Peconom, Environmental Project Manager at (202) 502-6352 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#195376717737497c7a76777674597f7c6b7a377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c36131412522c191f131213113c1a190e1f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 10, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15125 Filed 7-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

February 9, 2015

Hon. Gilberto Hinojosa

Attorney at Law

622 E. St. Charles St.

Brownsville, TX 78520

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Jerad Najvar

Attorney at Law

4151 Southwest Freeway, Ste. 625

Houston, TX 77027

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00581-CV

Tr.Ct.No. C-6914-13-G

Style: Lupe Rivera v. Leticia "Letty" Lopez

Dear Sir/Madam:

Appellee’s motion for leave to file sur-reply brief in the above cause was this day 

GRANTED by this Court. The brief has been ordered filed as of February 2, 2015, the 

date of receipt.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Peter LARSON.

No. 1536.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 17, 1937.

Carl L. Sackett, U. S. Atty., of Cheyenne, Wyo.

Armstrong & Armstrong, of Rawlins, Wyo., for appellee.

Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
# C_2022119EN.01004901.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/49

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — ICA Traffic v Commission

(Case T-717/21 R)

(Application for interim relief - Public procurement - Supply of disinfection robots - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2022/C 119/69)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ICA Traffic GmbH (Dortmund, Germany) (represented by: S. Hertwig and C. Vogt, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Mantl, B. Araujo Arce and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, that the Commission be ordered to not continue with the purchase, announced in its press release of 21 September 2021, of 100 additional disinfection robots on the ground that one of the framework contracts for the supply of a maximum of 200 disinfection robots has ceased to have effect and, second, the grant of any other interim measure necessary to maintain the status quo.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
#### Frances PILACHOWSKI, Appellant, v. Frank M. PILACHOWSKI, Appellee.

No. 71-53.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 21, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### GREEN, et al., Appellants, v. O. H. SCHWARTZ, Appellee.

No. 70-560.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04706

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04706\04706_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04706\04706_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04706\04706_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04706\04706_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04706\04706_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04706\04706_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04706\04706_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04706\04706_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04706\04706_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04706\Certification Statement Plant ID 04706.pdf Plant certification statement

04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_A5-2 plant aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_A5-3 WB Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_D3-1 POND 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_D3-1 POND 5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_F4-1 LTS-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_F4-1 LTS-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_F4-1 LTS-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_F5-6 Fly Ash Pond Wells.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_F5-6 Landfill Wells Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_Follow up Email 1.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials as part of survey.

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_Follow up Email 2.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials as part of survey.

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_Follow up Email 3.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials as part of survey.

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_Follow up Response 2.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials as part of survey.

x 04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_Follow up Response.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials as part of survey.

x 04706\04706_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04706\04706_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

04706\Supplemental Documents\04706_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Bontex,
Inc.'s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months
ended December 31, 1999, as set forth in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         394
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                   206
<INVENTORY>                                    5,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,814
<PP&E>                                         24,476
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,377
<BONDS>                                        2,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       157
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,273
<SALES>                                        18,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               18,034
<CGS>                                          13,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               87
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (650)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.41)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending November 30, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, P.
Evan Lasky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ P. Evan Lasky
-----------------
    P. Evan Lasky
    Chief Executive Officer
    January 8, 2003
#### MARTIN TUCKER & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. RIVERSIDE MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-830.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 29, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 29, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0165. IN THE INTEREST OF B. M. M. C., A CHILD (MOTHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2100245
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7327]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of section 
131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The Department is 
providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under Article X 
paragraph 3 of the Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of 
the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of 
Korea Concerning Civil Uses of Atomic Energy and the Agreement for 
Cooperation Between the United States of America and the Argentine 
Republic Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.

DATES: This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than 
April 13, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Sean Oehlbert, Office of 
Nonproliferation and International Security, National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Department of Energy. Telephone: 202-586-3806 or e-
mail: Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This subsequent arrangement concerns the 
retransfer of 9.2 kilograms of U.S.-origin atomized low-enriched 
uranium-8wt. % molybdenum powder, 19.734 percent enrichment, from Korea 
Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) in Daejeon, South Korea to 
Comisi[oacute]n Nacional de Energ[iacute]a At[oacute]mica (CNEA) in 
Buenos Aires, Argentina. The material, which is currently located at 
and prepared by KAERI, will be used for qualification testing of plate-
type nuclear fuel as part of a Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test 
Reactors (RERTR) program by CNEA. The material was originally obtained 
by KAERI from U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security 
Administration Y-12 National Security Complex pursuant to export 
license XSNM3613.
    In accordance with section 131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 
as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement 
concerning the retransfer of nuclear material of United States origin 
will not be inimical to the common defense and security.

    Dated: March 8, 2011.

    For the Department of Energy.
Anne M. Harrington,
Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2011-7327 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```