alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 116 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 116

              For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
any provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et 
seq.), Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles shall be held and considered to have 
been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required 
visa fee. Upon the granting of permanent residence to such alien as 
provided for in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by the proper number, during the current 
fiscal year or the fiscal year next following, the total number of 
immigrant visas which are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of such Act, or if applicable, 
the total number of immigrant visas which are made available to natives 
of the country of the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.

                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Principal Accounting Officer**

**Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C §1350)**

 

I, Barry Golko, of Analytical Surveys, Inc.,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB forthe year ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) which this statementaccompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Analytical Surveys, Inc.

 
| Dated: December 27, 2005 |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
| /s/ Barry Golko               |   |
| Barry Golko                   |
| Chief Accounting Officer      |

 

1

----
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000458

23-FEB-2018

07:54 AM
259 La. 633

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Marshall JOHNSON, Jr., v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51628.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 5, 1971.

In re: Marshall Johnson, Jr., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The minutes of March 12, 1970 in No. 75,830, charging armed robbery, affirmatively show that relator was informed of his constitutional rights, the nature and consequences of a guilty plea, the penalty assessed for the crime charged and that relator knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered the plea of guilty.
#### Nancy Feinerman et al., Respondents, v Brian Kaplan et al., Appellants.

[736 NYS2d 680]

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered February 15, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The Supreme Court properly addressed the merits of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, notwithstanding that it was made more than 120 days after the filing of the note, of issue *(see,*CPLR 3212 [a]; *Andaloro v Hidden Ponds Dev. Corp.,*273 AD2d 185; *Quinlan v Kaufman,*258 AD2d 453; *Gonzalez v 98 Mag Leasing Corp.,*261 AD2d 508, *affd*95 NY2d 124).

*481Summary judgment should have been granted in favor of the infant defendant, as he established, prima facie, that his actions were not a proximate cause of the decedent’s injuries, and the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to that showing (see, *Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Co.,*51 NY2d 308, 315).

Even if there had been a question of fact as to the liability of the infant defendant, his parents were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. It is well settled that “[pjarental liability for the torts of a child does not arise merely from the parental relationship” *(Gordon v Harris,*86 AD2d 948, 948-949; *see, Brahm v Hatch,*203 AD2d 640, 641; *Armour v England,*210 AD2d 561). Insofar as is relevant to this appeal, liability may arise where the child has a tendency to engage in vicious conduct that might endanger a third party, and the child’s parents are aware of such propensities *(see, LaTorre v Genesee Mgt.,*90 NY2d 576, 583; *DiCarlo v City of New York,*286 AD2d 363; *Brahm, supra).*

The record does not support the plaintiffs’ assertion that the infant defendant engaged in violent or vicious conduct prior to the incident in question and that his parents were aware of such conduct *(see, Brahm v Hatch, supra; Armour v England, supra).*The defendants Keith Kaplan and Amy Kaplan submitted proof in admissible form that they had no knowledge of the infant defendant’s tendency to engage in vicious conduct, and the plaintiffs failed to submit proof which raised a triable issue of fact. Thus, those defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Altman, J.P., Feuerstein, O’Brien and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
## Record of Contacts Docket No. FAA- 2011 - 125 6 Contacts. Wi th whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? O rganization P erson Contacted Date Response TCCA Helen Tsai 02/07/2011 Assisted in acquiring contact information for DECA Engineering DECA Engineering Bob Foster 02/15/2011 Affected S/N and corrective action instructions RAA Connie Arnold 02/22/2011 Informed of NPRM and the opportunity to comment

.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending November 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, P.
Evan Lasky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ P. Evan Lasky
-----------------
P. Evan Lasky
Accounting Supervisor
February 28, 2003
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 519

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding religious

intolerance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 12, 1994

Mr. DORNAN (for himself, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr.

GINGRICH, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. HYDE, Mr. DELAY, Mr. ARMEY, Mr.

MCCOLLUM, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. GOSS, Mr. PACKARD, Mr.

CRANE, Mr. FIELDS of Texas, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. KIM, Mr. BURTON

of Indiana, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. STEARNS, Mr.

GOODLATTE, Mr. STUMP, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. MCKEON,

Mr. TALENT, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. HANSEN, and Mr. SUNDQUIST) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives

regarding religious intolerance.

Whereas the rights, liberties, and freedoms enumerated in the

Constitution of the United States are guaranteed to all

citizens regardless of their religious beliefs or affiliations;

and

Whereas individuals of all religious denominations have made

substantial contributions to the establishment, preservation, and protection of the system of government of the

Nation: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HRES 519 IH

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) the House of Representatives strongly op3 poses anti-Christian bigotry and all other forms of

4 religious intolerance and condemns all manifesta5 tions and expressions of religious bigotry and intol6 erance;

7 (2) the House condemns individuals and organi8 zations that foster intolerance, suspicion, hatred, or

9 fear of individuals who—

10 (A) hold values rooted in religious tenets;

11 (B) participate in the political process to

12 ensure that the laws of the Nation reflect such

13 values; and

14 (C) advocate public policies that are re15 spectful of such values; and

16 (3) it shall be the policy of the House to seek

17 to ensure that the rights of individuals to participate

18 in the political process of the Nation are not in19 fringed on the basis of their religious beliefs or

20 affiliations.

Æ
Facility Data

Facility Name - DEC ID

Utica Metal Products

6-3016-00065

Address 1526 Lincoln Ave. Utica, NY 13502

Type of business Job Shop

# of Employees 73

Hours of Operation per year 2500

Annual Revenue ($) 5,000,000

Process Type Decorative electroplating

Tank Design and Operation

Dimensions (inches) 34L x 22W x 36H

Rectifier Capacity 0-12 volts, 750 amps, 9 KW

Annual Hours of Operation 2500

Emisison Control Technology

Type of control/control device fume supressant - Zero-Mist Liquid R

control device operating parameters 45 dynes/cm

Emission test data Complete test report

Exhaust design

Emission point EP00002

Stack height (m) 9.7536 32 feet

Stack diameter (m) 0.256 inches: 16.5 Lx 19.25 W

Exit velocity (m/sec) 2.05 6.725 ft/sec

cubic meters per minute 25 890 cfm

Exit temperature (K) 294 70 degrees F

Other Available Supporting Documents

Emission Inventory Report 1997

Chromium release lbs/yr 0.01

Permit Application/Operating permit

Title V - online

http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/32249.html

Process flow diagrams/plant layout Attached: 3 drawings in 2 files
inches: 16.5 Lx 19.25 W

6.725 ft/sec

70 degrees F
Rinse

Rinse Drip tray

Rinse

Rinse

Nickel Rinse

Bright Nickel Vat

Semi

Bright 

Nickel

Rinse

Rinse Rectifier

Controls

Chrome Plating Tank

Ni Strip

Nickel

Activator

Pickleen

 AS-10

Hot Rinse

Not to Scale

DI

Rinse

Rinse

Warm rinse

 Rinse Zincate

Electro

 Cleaner 

Sparkleen 367

Caustic

Rinse

Nickel 

Pickle

5%

Rinse

Nickel Chrome Plate

tank length width depth freeboard

activator 36 36 36 4 202.02 179.57

160 cleaner 48 30 36 4 224.47 199.53

nickel pickle 60 30 36 3 280.58 257.20

Semi-bright nickel 72 30 36 4 336.70 299.29

 Bright nickel 72 30 36 4 336.70 299.29

chrome 34 22 36 4 116.60 103.64

chrome spray rinse 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81

chrome rinse 1 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81

chrome rinse 2 24 24 36 4 3.00 79.81

chrome rinse 3 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81

chrome rinse hot 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81

Process Tank Volumes

maximum 

volume

operating 

volume
EXHIBIT 11

 

THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY

 

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER UNIT

**(inthousands, except  per unit)******

 

 
|                                                                                                |   | **Years Ended December 31** |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                |   | **2001**                    |   | **2000** |   | **1999** |   |
| Partnership  Units                                                                                  |   |                        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Average number  of units outstanding during the period                                              |   | 25,284                      |   | 27,658 |   | 31,388 |   |
|                                                                                                |   |                        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net units issuable in connection with  dilutive options based upon use of the treasury stock method |   | 296                         |   | 311 |   | 280 |   |
|                                                                                                |   |                        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Average number of primary units                                                                     |   | 25,580                      |   | 27,969 |   | 31,668 |   |
|                                                                                                |   |                        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                                                                                          |   | $                           | 91,057 |   | $ | 85,396 |   | $ | 90,392 |   |
|                                                                                                |   |                        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income per unit                                                                                 |   | $                           | 3.60   |   | $ | 3.09 |   | $ | 2.88 |   |
|                                                                                                |   |                        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income per unit - assuming dilution                                                             |   | $                           | 3.56   |   | $ | 3.05 |   | $ | 2.85 |   |
259 La. 871

#### Maude McDonough QUERBES v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO. et al.

No. 51726.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 1971.

In re: Paul G. Rocha applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 253 So.2d 83.

Writ denied: Under the facts found by the court of appeal, we find no error of law.

McCALEB, C. J.,

is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
# C_2023063EN.01004902.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/49

---

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2022 — Sunrise Medical and Sunrise Medical Logistics v Commission

(Case T-721/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff and statistical nomenclature - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff heading - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 63/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Sunrise Medical BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands), Sunrise Medical Logistics BV (Amsterdam) (represented by: L. Ruessmann and J. Beck, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hradil and M. Salyková, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1367 of 6 August 2021 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2021 L 294, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Dismisses the application as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application as inadmissible.

| 2. | Orders Sunrise Medical BV and Sunrise Medical Logistics BV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sunrise Medical BV and Sunrise Medical Logistics BV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 17.1.2022.

---
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-108735 andNo. 333-102946 of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. of our reports dated March 14,2006, on the consolidated financial statements of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc.,management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, whichappear in this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K./s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLPMadison, Wisconsin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Financial Data Schedule for Olympus Communications L.P. for the twelve
months ended December 31, 1997.  Information is only included for Olympus
Communications (a registrant) and does not include information for Olympus
Capital Corp., which has no operations.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000861255
<NAME> OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,577<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         265,783<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 728,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        673,804
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (112,217)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   728,952
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,363
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,751)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (51)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables net of Allowance
<F2>PP&E net of Depreciation
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION


I, B. Fred Oden, III, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Resource Technologies, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;




4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:




a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;




b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;




c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and




b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.




Dated this 17th day of August, 2011.


/s/ B. Fred Oden, III



B. Fred Oden, IIIPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2022119EN.01003801.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2022 — Construcciones Electromecánicas Sabero v EUIPO — Magdalenas de las Heras (Heras Bareche)

(Case T-99/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Heras Bareche - Earlier EU figurative mark MAGDALENAS DeLasHeras - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 119/51)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Construcciones Electromecánicas Sabero, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, P. Román Maestre and D. Liern Cendrero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Magdalenas de las Heras, SA (Aranda de Duero, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2020 (Case R 1019/2020-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Magdalenas de las Heras and Construcciones Electromecánicas Sabero.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Construcciones Electromecánicas Sabero, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Construcciones Electromecánicas Sabero, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.

---
#### GABLE ROOFING COMPANY, Inc., etc., Petitioner, v. Worley BROWN et al., Respondents.

No. 39991.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 5, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.