alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
252 La. 165

#### George VOGT, Jr. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 49219.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1968.

In re: City of New Orleans applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 208 So.2d 420.

Writs denied. The judgment complained of presents no error of law.
#### GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a California corporation, Appellant, v. Melba I. CORY, as surviving widow of Fay C. Cory, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 70-214.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Thomas R. Waddell, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02610

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

02612\02612_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

02612\02612_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 02612\02612_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02612\02612_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02612\02612_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02612\02612_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02612\02612_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02612\2612_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02612\Certification Statement_02612.pdf Plant certification statement

02612\Supporting Documentation\02612_DE Karn_SEEG ICR Transmittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02612\Supporting Documentation\02612_DEK_Part A_Section 5_A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02612\Supporting Documentation\02612_DEK_Part A_Section 5_A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02612\Supporting Documentation\02612_DEK_Part C_Section 2.3_C3-31.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02612\Supporting Documentation\DEK_Part D_Section 3.1_D3-POND-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02612\Supporting Documentation\Emails\Letter containing CBI from plant_2_25_11.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02612\Supporting Documentation\Emails\Re Steam Electric Questionnaire Questions - Karn 2612.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 02612\Supporting Documentation\Emails\Steam Electric Questionnaire Questions - 2612.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database .
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Denis Gallant, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,

not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant

and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known

to us by others within those entities, particularly during the

period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about

the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of

the end of the period covered by this report based on such

evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the

registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design

or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Denis Gallant

------------------------------

Denis Gallant

Chief Financial Officer



February 16, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, J. Gordon Huszagh, Acting Chief Financial Officer of
Suffolk Bancorp (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|Date: December 20, 2011       
|                              
|/s/ J. GORDON HUSZAGH         
|J. Gordon Huszagh             
|Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INS. CO. v. MASON.

No. 38417.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 218 So.2d 185.
Exhibit 8, only page

Changes in subsidiaries of Océ N.V. since the listing thereof in Océ Form 20-Ffor its fiscal year ended November 30, 2002.

| **Name of subsidiaries**                 |   | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation of Organisation** |   | **Notes**           |
|------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|                                          |   |                                                   |   |                     |
| Océ-Taiwan Ltd.                     |   | Taiwan                                            |   | In liquidation      |
| Océ Reprographic Technologies, Inc. |   | USA                                               |   | Acquired April 2000 |
#### Frank T. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-3.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 2, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
259 La. 874

#### William D’AUBIN et ux. v. MAURONER-CRADDOCK, INC., et al.

No. 51782.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 18, 1971.

In re: William D’Aubin and Edna Lucille Lovett D’Aubin applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 251 So.2d 398.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roubik Gregorian, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge, the Annual Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.



|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                             
|/s/    Roubik Gregorian                                                                                      
|Roubik Gregorian Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,717,620
<SECURITIES>                                 6,635,785
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,869,168
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,365,268)
<INVENTORY>                                 36,617,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            80,268,514
<PP&E>                                      35,499,927
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,882,109)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,202,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,152,526
<BONDS>                                     18,146,353
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    26,223,114
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,706,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               117,202,423
<SALES>                                     69,579,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,579,717
<CGS>                                       45,465,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,465,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            22,849,984
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,492,195)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (198,282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (49,877)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (248,159)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (248,159)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
#### Ann J. GALLANT, Petitioner, v. ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 40585.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 25, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ILMART CHRISTOPHE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3657

[ April 8, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502013CF012488AXXMB

.

Philip J. Massa of Philip J. Massa, P.A., West Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm B each, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, G ERBER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      22,252,710
<SECURITIES>                                 4,002,594
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,220,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                   782,149
<INVENTORY>                                    586,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,418,340
<PP&E>                                       5,743,254
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,612,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,471,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,183,719
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,170
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,373,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,471,098
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,832,561
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,104,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,079,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               877,407
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             170,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,332,911
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,332,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,332,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Elliott Harvey d/b/a * From the 259 th District Court

Pioneer Naturals Pet Foods, of Jones County,

Trial Court No. 023133

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00 222

- CV * October 12

, 202 3

Advanced Marketing Group, LLC

, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t he appeal

should be dismissed . Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal

is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are tax ed against the party

incurring same.
#### TALLAHASSEE MALL, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Robert J. ROGERS and Iva Lou Rogers, Appellees.

No. FF-282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 21, 1977.

C. Gary Williams and M. Julian Proctor, Jr., of Ausley, McMullen, McGehee, Caroth-ers & Proctor, Tallahassee, for appellant.

N. Sanders Sauls of Pennington, Wilkinson & Sauls, Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

First, we find and hold that appel-lees, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, had standing to bring their action there.

Second, recognizing that the lease which is the subject matter of this litigation was breached when appellees’ assignor assigned same to appellees without the prior written consent of appellant, we nevertheless hold, in accordance with the cases cited in the briefs, that such breach neither rendered the assignment invalid nor terminated the lease; therefore, we agree with the trial court that the primary issue to be resolved was whether appellant unreasonably withheld consent to the assignment. In that regard we find that there was sufficient competent evidence-before the trial court, apparently believed, to have sustained a finding that appellant did in fact consent to the assignment, though not in *1273writing; that appellant waived by its actions the requirement of written consent; and that in any event appellant’s consent was unreasonably withheld.

No useful purpose will be accomplished by recitation here of the evidence upon which we base the foregoing findings. That evidence is meticulously recounted in the briefs of the parties with citations to appropriate portions of the record on appeal. It was also recited during oral argument before the court.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1075 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1075

 To designate the Federal building in Fredericksburg, Virginia, as the 
      ``Samuel E. Perry Postal Building'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 1993

  Mr. Warner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal building in Fredericksburg, Virginia, as the 
      ``Samuel E. Perry Postal Building'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SAMUEL E. PERRY POSTAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 600 Princess Anne Street in 
Fredericksburg, Virginia, (commonly known as the ``Main Post Office'') 
shall be designated as the ``Samuel E. Perry Postal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Samuel E. Perry 
Postal Building''.

                                 <all>
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart-Tek Solutions
  Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
  2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
  Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: February 19, 2010                             | 
|--------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                    | 
|/s/ Perry Law                                       | 
|                                                    | 
|Perry Law                                           | 
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer | 

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Preferred Voice, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Ernest Gillespie, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Ernest Gillespie
|--------------------
|Ernest Gillespie    
|Controller          
|August 14, 2003     



22
#### Paul L. DIXON and Ann C. Dixon, Appellants, v. Frank J. SHARP, Appellee.

No. 72-97.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 24, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1


                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                                    THREE MONTHS     NINE MONTHS
                                YEAR ENDED     YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED   YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED      ENDED           ENDED
                                DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,   SEPTEMBER 30,
                                   1996           1997         1998(1)       1999         2000          2001            2001
                                ------------  ------------- ------------- -----------  ------------ -------------  --------------
<S>                             <C>           <C>            <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>            <C>
Earnings:
  Net loss ....................   $ (48,598)   $ (43,887)    $ (59,316)   $ (99,867)   $(117,801)   $ (23,228)        $ (96,125)
  Add:  Amount of
     previously capitalized
     interest amortized .......          --           --           252        2,288        2,288          572             1,716
  Add: Fixed charges ..........      35,041       38,499        43,798       65,310       65,649        3,280            32,374
                                  ---------    ---------     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------         ---------
  Adjusted earnings ...........     (13,557)      (5,388)      (15,266)     (32,269)     (49,864)     (19,376)          (62,035)

Fixed charges:
  Interest in
     indebtedness .............      32,368       36,672        52,645       63,452       63,418        2,642            30,055
  Amortization of debt
     issuance costs ...........       2,143          844         1,172        1,291        1,992          251             1,209
  Interest portion
     of rental and
     lease expense ............         530          983         1,428          567          239          387             1,110
                                  ---------    ---------     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------         ---------
  Fixed charges ...............      35,041       38,499        55,245       65,310       65,649        3,280            32,374

Deficiency of
  earnings available to
  cover fixed charges .........   $ (48,598)   $ (43,887)    $ (70,511)   $ (97,579)   $(115,513)   $ (22,656)        $ (94,409)
                                  =========    =========     =========    =========    =========    =========         =========

Earnings to fixed charges ratio          --           --            --           --           --           --                --
</Table>

(1) The fixed charge adjustment to earnings excludes $11.4 million of
capitalized interest.