alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 755 

Supporting the goals and ideals of American Education Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2014 

Mr. JOYCE (for himself, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. MEEHAN, and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of American Education 

Week. 

Whereas November 16 through November 22, 2014, marks 

the 93rd annual observance of American Education 

Week; 

Whereas public schools are the backbone of the Nation’s democracy, providing young people with the tools they need 

to maintain the Nation’s precious values of freedom, civility, and equality; 

Whereas, by equipping young people in the United States 

with both practical skills and broader intellectual abilities, public schools give them hope for, and access to, a 

productive future; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 755 IH 

Whereas people working in the field of public education, be 

they teachers, higher education faculty and staff, 

paraeducators, custodians, substitute educators, bus drivers, clerical workers, food service professionals, workers 

in skilled trades, health and student service workers, security guards, technical employees, or librarians, work 

tirelessly to serve children and communities throughout 

the Nation with care and professionalism; and 

Whereas public schools are community linchpins, bringing together adults, children, educators, volunteers, business 

leaders, and elected officials in a common enterprise: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of American 

3 Education Week; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe American Education Week by reflecting 

6 on the positive impact of all those who work together 

7 to educate children. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 9 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 9

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 3, 2013.
    Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, the hour of daily meeting of the 
House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative 
business was conducted on the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and 
Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1
  EXHIBIT 12 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS


                           COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Years Ended December 31,
                                                                           -------------------------------
                                                                             1999        1998        1997
                                                                           -------     -------     -------
                                                                                (Dollars in thousands)

  <S>                                                                      <C>         <C>         <C>
  Pretax income........................................................    $ 2,161     $ 5,106     $ 4,945
  Add fixed charges:
      Interest on deposits.............................................     23,594      21,963      18,765
      Interest on borrowings...........................................      1,023         730         777
      Portion of rental expense representing interest expense..........        227         180          78
                                                                           -------     -------     -------
          Total fixed charges..........................................     24,844      22,873      19,620
                                                                           -------     -------     -------

  Income before fixed charges..........................................    $27,005     $27,979     $24,565
                                                                           =======     =======     =======

  Pretax income........................................................    $ 2,161     $ 5,106     $ 4,945
  Add fixed charges:
      Interest on borrowings...........................................      1,023         730         777
      Portion of rental expense representing interest expense..........        227         180          78
                                                                           -------     -------     -------
          Total fixed charges (excluding interest on deposits).........      1,250         910         855
                                                                           -------     -------     -------

  Income before fixed charges (excluding interest on deposits).........    $ 3,411     $ 6,016     $ 5,800
                                                                           =======     =======     =======

  RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:
      Including interest on deposits...................................       1.09X       1.22x       1.25x
      Excluding interest on deposits...................................       2.73X       6.61x       6.78x
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40652

Conference Calendar

 

TODD CARRAWAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE STATE OF TEXAS; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE; JAMES A. LYNAUGH; LUPE LAZANO,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-94-CV-43

- - - - - - - - - -

October 22, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Todd Carraway, a Texas prisoner (# 668946), appeals from the

district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the

defendants in his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. He asserts that the district court erred in determining

that the defendants had not denied him access to the courts by
No. 96-40652

-2-

maintaining an inadequate law library at his place of

confinement. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the

parties and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment for essentially

the same reasons adopted by the district court. See Carraway v.

The State of Texas et al., No. L-94-CV-43 (S.D. Tex. May 14,

1996).

AFFIRMED.
No. 10579.

#### Cook et al. *v.*The Pennsylvania & Ohio Railway Co.

Decided December 8, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Ashtabula county.

*Mr. R. W. Calvin*and *Messrs. Hoyt, Munsell & Hall,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Charles iMwyer*and *Mr. H. E. Starkey,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION**

**302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Ernest Gillespie,certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofPreferred Voice, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or cause such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and 

 

c. disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls. 

 

/s/  Ernest Gillespie

 

Ernest Gillespie 

Controller 

(Principal Financial Officer) 

August 14, 2003
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

AKHIR MUHAIMIN WILLIAMS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-50034

D.C. No. 2:01-cr-00297-ABC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. King, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 26, 2016**

Before: McKEOWN, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Akhir Muhaimin Williams appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 50-month term of supervised release and two special conditions

imposed upon his second revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 29 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-50034

Williams argues that the district court procedurally erred in imposing the 50-

month term of supervised release and that the term is unreasonable. We disagree. 

The record reflects that the district court considered Williams’s arguments and 

adequately explained its determination that a 50-month term of supervised release 

was necessary. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) 

(en banc). Moreover, the record reflects that the district court considered only 

proper sentencing factors, including Williams’s repeated failure to comply with the 

terms of release and the need to protect the public. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). 

Finally, the term of supervised release is substantively reasonable in light of the 

sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See Gall v. United States, 

552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). 

Williams next challenges the special conditions of supervised release 

requiring him to (1) participate in mental health treatment, as directed by 

probation, and (2) submit to warrantless searches upon reasonable suspicion of 

unlawful conduct. Contrary to Williams’s arguments, the district court’s reasons 

for imposing each of these conditions are apparent from the record. See United 

States v. Daniels, 541 F.3d 915, 924 (9th Cir. 2008). Moreover, because the 

conditions are reasonably related to deterrence and the protection of the public, and 
3 15-50034

do not involve a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary, the 

district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing them. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3583(d); Daniels, 541 F.3d at 924. Lastly, the warrantless search condition does 

not violate Williams’s Fourth Amendment rights. See United States v. Dupas, 419 

F.3d 916, 922 (9th Cir. 2005). 

We do not consider issues or arguments not raised and argued in the opening 

brief. See United States v. Mejia-Pimental, 477 F.3d 1100, 1105 n.9 (9th Cir. 

2007). 

AFFIRMED.
#### Selig SNOW, Petitioner, v. Florence BLOOM, Executrix of the Estate of Bernard Bloom, Deceased, individually, Respondent.

No. 42117.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 17, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ADKÍNS and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.
#### Bernard STEPPE, Jr. v. STATE.

No. 38757.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (100)
<INVENTORY>                                     43,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,219
<PP&E>                                          75,754
<DEPRECIATION>                                (36,385)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,015
<SALES>                                        258,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,194
<CGS>                                          174,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   119
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,752
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of this Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 (adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer
of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|               |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|March 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ VICENTE WRIGHT                   
|               |  |     |  | Vicente Wright                       
|               |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 1, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas*                     (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

                    1.                     *VBT Financial Corporation, San Antonio, Texas;*                     to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Inter National Bank, McAllen, Texas.                

 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 5, 2018.

Yao-Chin Chao,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-14721 Filed 7-9-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
# C_2022418EN.01002901.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — OE v Commission

(Case T-486/21) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Teleworking - Claim for reimbursement of telephone and Internet connection expenses - Claim rejected - Plea of illegality - Partial admissibility - Article 71 of and Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Principle of equality and non-discrimination - Right to respect for private life)

(2022/C 418/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: OE (represented by: G. Hervet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Windisch, S. Bukšek Tomac and J. Van Pottelberge, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, acting as Agent)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, first, annulment of the decision of the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Brussels (OIB) of the European Commission of 18 December 2020 rejecting her claim for reimbursement of the professional expenses resulting from the teleworking arrangements imposed on her and for a 4G USB dongle, and, secondly, an order that the Commission, first of all, reimburse her for those expenses, next, provide her with that Internet access and, lastly, pay her compensation of EUR 10 000 for the damage she has allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders OE to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OE to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Decides that the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union are to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Decides that the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union are to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.

---