alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward BERGER, Appellant, v. WHEATON VAN LINES, INC., and Julia Berger, Appellees.

No. 71-662.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 27, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### UNITED STATES CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. Jack R. ARNOLD et al., Respondents.

No. 40929.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 29, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 7, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 725 

Commending the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs for their 

joint campaign to raise awareness during September, Suicide Prevention 

Month, to reduce suicide among members of the United States Armed 

Forces and veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 

Ms. ESTY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ 

Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs for their joint campaign to raise awareness during 

September, Suicide Prevention Month, to reduce suicide 

among members of the United States Armed Forces and 

veterans. 

Whereas suicide is a leading noncombat cause of death 

among members of the United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas on average, 22 veterans are lost to suicide in the 

United States each day; 

Whereas more than 38,000 people in the United States take 

their lives each year, 20 percent of whom are veterans; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 725 IH 

Whereas the Joshua Omvig Suicide Prevention Act (Public 

Law 110–110; 121 Stat. 1031) was enacted in 2007 to 

establish a comprehensive program for suicide prevention 

among veterans; 

Whereas the Veterans Crisis Line, which was established 

under the Joshua Omvig Suicide Prevention Act, has received more than 890,000 telephone calls and facilitated 

more than 30,000 life-saving rescues; 

Whereas many suicides are preventable, and 90 percent of individuals who die by suicide have a diagnosable psychiatric disorder at the time of death; 

Whereas September is National Suicide Prevention Awareness Month; and 

Whereas in September 2014, the Department of Defense and 

the Department of Veterans Affairs launched the joint 

public awareness campaign ‘‘The Power of 1’’ to draw attention to the mental health services and suicide prevention programs available to members of the United States 

Armed Forces and veterans, focusing on everyday actions 

that can save lives: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the Department of Defense and 

3 the Department of Veterans Affairs for raising 

4 awareness during Suicide Prevention Month of the 

5 life-saving resources available to those who have 

6 served, or are currently serving, in uniform; and 

7 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

8 Suicide Prevention Awareness Month, ‘‘The Power 

9 of 1’’ campaign, and efforts to improve outreach to 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 725 IH 

1 individuals at risk for suicide, especially those ad2 dressed to veterans and members of the United 

3 States Armed Forces. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.3

                            PAGEMART WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
                                                -----------------------------------------------
                                                   NUMBER           PERCENT        EQUIVALENT
                                                  OF SHARES       OUTSTANDING        SHARES
                                                -------------    -------------    -------------
<S>                                             <C>              <C>              <C>      
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                             2,300,000           100.00%       2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                            642,233            96.78%         621,571
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock       15,310,943           100.00%      15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                     11,242,857           100.00%      11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                      4,323,874           100.00%       4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                       6,000,000           100.00%       6,000,000
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued          58,431            53.78%          31,425
   1997 Warrants Exercised                             48,300            68.40%          33,039
                                                -------------                     -------------
                                                   39,926,638                        39,863,709

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                  39,863,709

NET LOSS                                                                          $ (23,159,874)


NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                $       (0.58)
                                                                                  =============
</TABLE>
#### PRINGLE ASSOCIATED MORTGAGE CORPORATION v MERCURY AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 49493.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 26, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1977.

Aultman, Pope, Aultman & Tyner, Thomas W. Tyner, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

White & Morse, Richard P. Salloum, Graves, Riley & Meadows, Joseph R. Meadows, Richard B. Graves, Gulfport, for appel-lees.

Before INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON and BOWLING, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Harrison County; Frank W. Alexander, Chancellor.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM and LEE, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure will hold a meeting on October 10, 2018. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at:                         *http://www.uscourts.gov/​rules-policies/​records-and-archives-rules-committees/​agenda-books.*

# DATES:

October 10, 2018 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Vanderbilt University Law School, Alexander Room, 1st Floor, 131 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: July 13, 2018.

Rebecca A. Womeldorf,

Rules Committee Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-15360 Filed 7-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 11

                      THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER UNIT
                         (in thousands, except per unit)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          Years Ended December 31,
                                                                         --------------------------------------------------
                                                                                1998              1997             1996
                                                                         ----------------  ----------------  --------------
<S>                                                                      <C>               <C>               <C>
Partnership Units

   Average number of units outstanding during the period                       33,986            34,520           35,292

   Net units issuable in connection with dilutive options based 
    upon use of the treasury stock method                                         390               230              119
                                                                               ------            ------           ------
   Average number of primary units                                             34,376            34,750           35,411
                                                                               ------            ------           ------
                                                                               ------            ------           ------
Net income                                                                    $64,080           $44,493          $41,889
                                                                               ------            ------           ------
                                                                               ------            ------           ------
Net income per unit                                                            $ 1.89            $ 1.29           $ 1.19
                                                                               ------            ------           ------
                                                                               ------            ------           ------
Net income per unit - assuming dilution                                        $ 1.86            $ 1.28           $ 1.18
                                                                               ------            ------           ------
                                                                               ------            ------           ------
</TABLE>
##### 



AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Amendment Company Employee
  Agreement
     Eligible Property
    
    Percentage- *******************************************
    
    
    **
    %- Ocala Sale to Government or Not-For-Profit Buyer(a)
    
    
    2.25
    %(b)- *******************************************
    
    
    **
    %- *******************************************
    
    
    **
    %- *******************************************
    
    
    **
    %- Rio Rico Utilities
    
    
    1
    %- *******************************************
    
    
    **
    %- *******************************************
    
    
    **
    %- *******************************************
    
    
    **
    %




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



AVATAR HOLDINGS INC.By:
    /s/  Gerald D. KelferName:
    Gerald D. KelferTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer /s/  Dennis J. GetmanDennis J. Getman 3
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00432

- CR

Otto Ray KIETZMAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013W0631

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial

court is AFFIRMED. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

SIGNED December 23, 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
EX-10.12





 Exhibit 10.12 

 
 



 
 PROJECT PATRIOT BONUS AGREEMENT 

August 28, 2020 
 Dear Steve 

SkyWater Technology Foundry, Inc. is pleased to present you with this Project Patriot Bonus Agreement, which has the potential bonus earnings value of $62,500
(subject to applicable tax withholdings), subject to all the terms and conditions detailed below. 
 The actual bonus earned shall depend on completion of
Project Patriot and your level of effort and performance in the 7 project phases as well as the successful refinancing/recapitalization of the Company. 

In addition to the overall Project Patriot success and completion of the project, you must remain an employee in good standing and on active payroll through
the payout date in order to receive a payout. The “payout date” shall be the date on which the President and Chief Financial Officer review and determine the performance results associated with the overall project success. Such
determination shall be documented on a Project Summary Evaluation. If you terminate employment (either voluntarily or “for cause”) with the Company prior to the payout date, you forfeit any bonus that would have been achieved. 

This letter is not intended to be constructed as an employment contract, it does not guarantee the length of your employment with the Company, nor does it
alter the at-will nature of your employment with SkyWater Technology Foundry, Inc. You agree to keep the existence, amount and terms of this Project Bonus Agreement set forth herein completely confidential.
You shall not publish or disclose to any third party any confidential or proprietary information concerning the Company that was acquired or learned during your employment with the Company. 

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota without reference to conflicts of law rules. 

 

									
	/s/ Steve Wold	 	8/31/2020	 		 	  
	 	  

	Steve Wold	 	Date	 		 		 	
					
	/s/ Steve Manko	 	8/28/2020	 		 	/s/ Tom Sonderman	 	8/28/2020
	Steve Manko, CFO	 	Date	 		 	Tom Sonderman, President	 	Date

  

					
	Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MILTOPE
GROUP INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         128,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,890,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 13,836,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,133,000
<PP&E>                                      16,334,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,765,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,332,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,134,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,790,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,332,000
<SALES>                                     45,513,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,513,000
<CGS>                                       34,436,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,667,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,076,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,770,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,170,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,170,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
#### Richard FLEAK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-399.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1970.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; W. Rogers Turner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Bob BROWN d/b/a Bob Brown’s Biscayne Marine, Appellant, v. James A. BLAESER, Appellee.

No. 73-1388.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2022244EN.01003502.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Anferlux-Electrodomésticos (SmartThinQ)

(Case T-181/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark SmartThinQ - Earlier national figurative mark SMARTTHING - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Translation of the list of goods covered by the earlier mark into the language of the proceedings - Genuine use of the earlier mark)

(2022/C 244/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Anferlux-Electrodomésticos, Lda (Vila Nova de Monsarros, Portugal)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2021 (Case R 1657/2020-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Anferlux-Electrodomésticos and LG Electronics.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders LG Electronics, Inc., to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LG Electronics, Inc., to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.

---
HeinOnline -- 38 Fed. Reg. 1254 1973
HeinOnline -- 38 Fed. Reg. 1255 1973
HeinOnline -- 38 Fed. Reg. 1256 1973
HeinOnline -- 38 Fed. Reg. 1257 1973
259 La. 875

#### ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. FAIRMONT ROOSEVELT HOTEL, INC.

No. 51680.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 18, 1971.

In re: Zurich Insurance Company and Travelers Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 250 So.2d 94.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.

BARHAM, J., dissents from the refusal and assigns written reasons.

TATE, J., joins .in BARHAM, J., dissent.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that writs should be granted.

BARHAM, Justice

(dissenting from refusal to grant writ).

Civil Code Articles 2965-2971 make effects brought by travelers into a hotel or inn “necessary” deposits and impose absolute liability upon the landlord or innkeeper *214as depositary. Article 2971 limits, upon compliance with its mandate, the innkeeper’s *strict*liability as a depositary to $100.-00. Article 2969 permits the innkeeper to be released from responsibility for jewelry and “other valuable articles of such description as may be contained *in small compass”.*(Emphasis mine.) Article 2969 expressly states, however, that the protection there afforded in the case of small, valuable objects will not apply if the innkeeper or his employees are guilty of “fraud or negligence”.

The property stolen from the traveler in the instant case, furs, is not covered by Article 2969. If the relators relied upon the depositary’s absolute liability, they would be limited to the recovery of $100.00 since there was no special agreement for excess liability with the hotel and since the hotel had complied with the requirements of Civil Code Article 2971 that it post conspicuously in the guest rooms a notice of its limitation of loss. However, relators do not seek to recover from the hotel under these Civil Code articles treating “necessary deposit”, but instead seek to recover under Article 2315, alleging the *negligence*of the hotel. The hotel is unable to limit or escape its liability for its *negligence,*which is the proximate cause of the loss of the guest’s effects here.

The French and Louisiana Civil Codes have treated the necessary depositary as an insurer. Historically, our Legislature has attempted to relax the innkeeper’s *strict*liability as depositary, but never to exempt him from liability for his own *negligence.*22 Tulane L.Rev. 333.

The Code is clear and explicit in its intent, history and doctrine support that intent, and there is no line of jurisprudence to the contrary. Cf. Pfennig v. Roosevelt Hotel, 31 So.2d 31 (La.App.Orl.1947). I submit the Court of Appeal opinion is an incorrect statement of the law.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1220

To suspend temporarily the duty on exomethylene ceph v sulfoxide ester.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. COATS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on exomethylene ceph v

sulfoxide ester.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXOMETHYLENE CEPH V SULFOXIDE ESTER.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 Exomethylene ceph v sulfoxide ester (provided for in

subheading 2934.90.40) ..... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section applies with respect to articles entered, or
2

•S 1220 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### James W. BROCK, Appellant, v. Claude JONES, Appellee.

No. 710.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 27, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 27, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.