alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Secured Digital Applications,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending  December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kelvin
Choon-Huat Ng, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kelvin Choon-Huat Ng

Kelvin Choon-Huat Ng
Chief Accounting Officer
April 14, 2008
#### KERSLAKE v. COMMUNITY FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF RIVERIA BEACH.

No. 38831.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Meeting Agenda

August 14, 2014 from 12 – 1:30 PM (PDT)

Teleconference: 1.866.299.3188, 202.343.9113#

Purpose: Opportunity for Arizona officials and utilities to ask questions regarding EPA’s proposed 

Clean Power Plan.

I. Welcome and Introductions 5 min

II. Questions and Discussion (see attached concerns and question) 80 min

III. Summarize Next Steps 5 min

 How to submit comments on proposal: http://www2.epa.gov/carbon-pollutionstandards/how-comment-clean-power-plan-proposed-rule

 Spreadsheets and Technical Support Documents: http://www2.epa.gov/carbon-pollutionstandards/clean-power-plan-proposed-rule-technical-documents

Anticipated Attendees

ADEQ: Henry Darwin, Eric Massey, Steve Burr

Tucson Electric Power: Erik Bakken, Jeff Yockey, Mike Sheehan

Salt River Project: Kara Montalvo, Barbara Sprungl, Kelly Barr

Arizona Corporation Commission: Steve Olea, Ed Stoneburg, Margaret ‘Toby’ Little

Arizona Electric Power Coop: Logan Gernet, Eric Hiser, Michelle Freeark

Arizona Public Service: Chas Spell, Ann Becker, Mike Kafka

Pacificorp: Bill Lawson and Cathy Woollums

Tristate: TBD

Tom Powers OAR, Senior Policy Advisor

Will Niebling OAR, Senior Advisor for Congressional and International Affairs

Reid Harvey OAP, Director, Clean Air Markets Division

Joe Bryson OAP, Climate Protection Partnership Division

Matt Clouse OAP, Climate Protection Partnership Division

Jeremy Mark OAP, Clean Air Markets Division

Jim Ketcham-Colwill Office of Policy Analysis and Review

David Solomon Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Debra Dalcher Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Nathan Topham, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Colin Boswell Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Nicholas Swanson Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Deborah Jordan Director, R9 Air Division

Colleen McKaughan Associate Director, R9 Air Division

Amy Zimpfer Associate Director, R9 Air Division

Ben Machol Chief, Clean Energy & Climate Change Office

Niloufar Glosson R9

Anita Lee R9

Ray Saracino R9
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





S. James
Miller, Chief Executive Officer of ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the “Company”),
and Wayne Wetherell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.    
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and





2.The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Annual Report and the results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Annual Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the
undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
the 24th day of February, 2010.





/s/    S.
      James MillerS.
      James MillerChief
      Executive Officer/s/    Wayne
      WetherellWayne
      WetherellChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will be retained by ImageWare
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### John RICHEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AMERICAN SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 3846.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 10, 1972.

Cormie & Morgan by Robert E. Morgan, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant.

Plauché, Smith & Hebert by Reid K. Hebert, Lake Charles, for defendant-ap-pellee.

Before SAVOY, CULPEPPER and DO-MENGEAUX, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

Plaintiff’s dump truck was damaged due to the negligence of the defendant motorist. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial judge erred in refusing to award plaintiff damages for loss of profits from the dump truck, during the 39 working days while it was being repaired.

During the time in question, plaintiff had a contract to haul sand and gravel. He drove one of his two trucks, hired a driver for the other and also leased additional trucks. Plaintiff contends he lost profits in the sum of $2,603.39 because one of his own trucks was damaged and he had to rely on the leased trucks. This contention is based principally on the testimony of plaintiff’s wife, who keeps the books on his hauling business. She said that the truck owned and driven by plaintiff earned such a net profit even after allowing for the wages of a driver. Testimony as to the earnings of other trucks on the job cast doubt on the figures given by Mrs. Richey. Furthermore, plaintiff earned a commission on the leased trucks with which he was able to complete the job.

In a written opinion the trial judge held: “Plaintiff has failed to prove, with reasonable certainty, his claim for loss of profits for loss of the use of the vehicle during the time in question, and that claim is therefore rejected.” We find no manifest error in this factual conclusion of the trial judge who saw and heard the witnesses.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff appellant.

Affirmed.
#### BARTOW DAIRY, INC. et al., Petitioners, v. William L. DICKEY et al., Respondents.

No. 39830.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 13, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-31216

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SUNDAY ADEOSHUN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

No. 2:01-CR-13-2

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sunday Adeoshun, a federal prisoner, moves to proceed in forma pauperis

(“IFP”) on appeal. The district court denied Adeoshun’s motion to appeal IFP

and certified that the appeal was not taken in good faith. By moving for IFP
No. 06-31216

2

status, Adeoshun is challenging that certification. See Baugh v.Taylor, 117F.3d

197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Adeoshun’s motion addresses only his asserted indigent status and does

not brief any argument regarding the district court’s determination that his appeal was not taken in good faith. Failure to identify an error in the district

court’s analysis is the same as if the appellant had not appealed the judgment.

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.

1987). Although pro se briefs are liberally construed, even pro se litigants must

brief arguments to preserve them. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.

1993). 

Adeoshun has not shown that the district court’s determination that his

appeal is not taken in good faith is incorrect. The instant appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Accordingly, the request for IFP status is

denied, and the appeal is dismissed. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. We caution Adeoshun that the filing of frivolous pleadings of any kind may result in the imposition of sanctions, including

dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in

this court and any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

Kurt C Nielsen v Safeguard Properties LLC 

Docket No. 333244 

LC No. 2015-149178-NZ 

Christopher M. Murray 

Presiding Judge 

Karen M. Fort Hood 

Elizabeth L. Gleicher 

Judges 

The Court orders that the November 9, 2017 opinion is hereby AMENDED to correct a 

clerical error in the caption information. The opinion caption is amended to correct the spelling of 

plaintiff-appellant's name to "Kurt C. Nielsen.". 

In all other respects, the November 9, 2017 opinion remains unchanged. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

DEC 2 1 2017 

Date
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

BARRISTER GLOBAL SERVICES NETWORK, INC.



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Barrister Global Services Network, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-8749 and 333-89947) of Barrister Global Services Network, Inc. on Form
S-8 of our report dated May 18, 2001, appearing in and incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Barrister Global Services Network, Inc. for
the year ended March 31, 2001.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Buffalo, New York
May 18, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 78 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 78

    Expressing support for designation of July as National Sarcoma 
                            Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2013

  Ms. Castor of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for designation of July as National Sarcoma 
                            Awareness Month.

Whereas sarcoma is a cancer of connective tissues, such as nerves, muscles, 
        joints, fat, bones, and blood vessels, and it can arise anywhere in the 
        body;
Whereas more than 13,000 people in the United States were diagnosed with sarcoma 
        last year, more than 5,000 died, and 50,000 are struggling with the 
        disease at any one time;
Whereas 1 percent of the cancers diagnosed in adults and 15 percent of cancers 
        diagnosed in children each year are sarcoma;
Whereas more than 50 subtypes of sarcomas have been identified;
Whereas the National Cancer Institute recognizes that sarcoma is often 
        misdiagnosed and underreported; and
Whereas July would be an appropriate month to designate as National Sarcoma 
        Awareness Month to raise awareness of the disease and encourage more 
        individuals to get properly diagnosed and treated: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of National Sarcoma Awareness Month.
                                 <all>
```
258 La. 705

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Clinton C. HOWARD v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51415.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1971.

In re: Clinton C. Howard applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Application denied; the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT 21.1

EXAR CORPORATION

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|1. | Micro Power Systems, Inc. (a California corporation).
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------



|2. | Exar IC Canada Corporation (a Canadian corporation).
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------



|3. | Exar SARL (a French limited liability corporation).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------



|4. | Exar GMBH(a German corporation).
|-- | --------------------------------



|5. | Exar Srl (an Italian corporation).
|-- | ----------------------------------



|6. | Exar Japan Corporation (a Japanese corporation).
|-- | ------------------------------------------------



|7. | Exar Korea Co. Ltd.(a Korean limited liability corporation).
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------



|8. | Exar Malaysia SDN BHD (a Malaysian limited liability corporation).
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



|9. | Exar Ltd. (a United Kingdom limited liability corporation).
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------



|10. | Exar (Hangzhou)Information Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing Branch.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------



|11. | Exar (Hangzhou) Information Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



|12. | Exar (Delaware) Corporation Shenzhen Representative Office.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------



|13. | Exar (Delaware) Corporation Taiwan Branch Office.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------



|14. | Exar (Hangzhou) Information Technologies Co., Ltd. (a Peoples Republic of China limited liability corporation).
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|15. | Exar Corporation Hong Kong Branch office.
|--- | -----------------------------------------



|16. | Galazar Networks Inc.
|--- | ---------------------



|17. | Neterion Corporation.
|--- | ---------------------
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lucid, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin J. Joyce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
March 30, 2012

/s/ MARTIN J. JOYCE Martin J. Joyce Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                  ------------
         Section 1350 Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and
                           Principal Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of 1st Independence
Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2007 (the  "Report") of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 6, 2007     /s/ N. William White
                                --------------------------------
                                Name:     N. William White
                                Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)


                            /s/ R. Michael Wilbourn
                                --------------------------------
                                Name:     R. Michael Wilbourn
                                Title:    Executive Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, James C. Mroczkowski, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Merchants;
2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-115(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 16, 2005
/s/ James C. Mroczkowski
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         269,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,082
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,550,990
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,427,418)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 523,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     485,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   523,019
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               487,226
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  514,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                238,083
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            238,083
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   238,083
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       of
                            Periodic Financial Report
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350

I, Arthur G. Ritchie, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Sand Technology Inc., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form
20-F for the Fiscal Year ended July 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sand
Technology Inc.

Date: January 29, 2008

                                  /s/ Arthur G. Ritchie
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                      Chairman of the Board,
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other
purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.