Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2023 ALJ Decisions
                              In re LCD Complaint: Assays for Vitamins and Metabolic Function, (L34914), DAB CR6397 (2023)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




In re LCD Complaint: Assays for Vitamins and Metabolic Function, (L34914), DAB CR6397 (2023)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





*In re LCD Complaint:*Assays for Vitamins and Metabolic Function(L34914)
Docket No. C-23-746Decision No. CR6397November 24, 2023

        
              
    

      DECISION DISMISSING UNACCEPTABLE COMPLAINTFor the reasons stated below, I must dismiss the Complaint challenging local coverage determination (LCD) L34914.I.  Background and Procedural HistoryLCDs are policies issued by Medicare fiscal intermediaries or carriers, generally known as contractors.  42 C.F.R. § 426.110 (definition of *Contractor*).  The regulations define LCD as:*Local coverage determination (LCD)* means a decision by a fiscal intermediary or a carrier under Medicare Part A or Part B, as applicable, whether to cover a particular service on an intermediary-wide or carrier-wide basis in accordance with section 1862(a)(1)(A) of the [Social Security] Act.  An LCD may provide that a service is not reasonable and necessary for certain diagnoses and/or for certain diagnosis codes.42 C.F.R. § 400.202.LCDs may be challenged under 42 U.S.C. § 1395ff(f) and 42 C.F.R. part 426.  Only individuals qualifying as an "aggrieved party," as defined below, may file a complaint challenging the validity of an LCD.  42 C.F.R. § 426.320.Page 2*Aggrieved party* means a Medicare beneficiary, or the estate of a Medicare beneficiary, who—(1) Is entitled to benefits under Part A, enrolled under Part B, or both (including an individual enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare, in a Medicare + Choice plan, or in another Medicare managed care plan);(2) Is in need of coverage for a service that is denied based on an applicable LCD (in the relevant jurisdiction) or an NCD [(national coverage determination)], regardless of whether the service was received; and(3) Has obtained documentation of the need by the beneficiary's treating physician.42 C.F.R. § 426.110.After receiving a complaint, an administrative law judge must first determine if the complaint is acceptable under the requirements in 42 C.F.R. § 426.400.42 C.F.R. §§ 426.405(c)(1), 426.410(b).The Civil Remedies Division (CRD) of the Departmental Appeals Board received correspondence dated October 17, 2022, from Dr. Megan J. Schlichte challenging LCD L34914 with respect to her patient, T.L.  In the letter, Dr. Schlichte stated that the "letter serves as my request for appeal of the inappropriate decision of the insurance company to deny coverage of laboratory testing . . ."  Dr. Schlichte explained that due to T.L.'s history of "multiple invasive melanomas as well as squamous cell carcinomas," his 20-pound weight loss over a period of a few short months prompted Dr. Schlichte to order several labs "to work up [T.L's] very concerning weight loss, concerning for metastatic cancer."  Based on the contents of the letter, it appears that Dr. Schlichte may be acting as a representative for T.L. and is challenging the LCD regarding the diagnostic lab claims enclosed with the letter.  Therefore, for purposes of this decision, I construe Dr. Schlichte's letter as an LCD Complaint.After receiving the complaint, I determined that the complaint was timely but not acceptable under the requirements in the regulations.  In a September 20, 2023 Acknowledgment of Receipt and Order to Aggrieved Party to Amend Unacceptable Complaint (Order), I first informed Dr. Schlichte that if she is acting as the aggrieved party's (AP's) representative, she must file a written authorization signed by T.L. appointing her as representative as well as additional identifying information for T.L. to confirm that T.L. is an AP.  Order at 3.  I then stated that the AP had 30 days to file a valid amended complaint that contained the following required information under 42Page 3C.F.R. § 426.400:*Beneficiary-identifying information.*  The AP must provide the beneficiary identifying information;*Written authorization.*  If Dr. Schlichte is acting as T.L.'s representative, then a copy of a written authorization to represent T.L. must be submitted;*Timeliness Information.*  A complete copy of the initial denial notice that includes the date of the notice;*LCD-identifying information.*  The specific provision(s) of the LCD adversely affecting T.L. as the AP;*Aggrieved Party statement.*  A statement from the AP explaining why he thinks that the relevant provision(s) of the LCD is (are) not valid under the reasonableness standard; and*Clinical or scientific evidence.*  Copies of clinical or scientific evidence that support the complaint and an explanation for why the AP thinks that this evidence shows that the LCD is not reasonable.In my Order, I also stated that the AP's response had to be filed electronically through the Departmental Appeals Board Electronic Filing System (DAB E-File) unless the AP obtained a written waiver.  Order at 4-5.The AP's valid amended complaint was due October 20, 2023.  As of this date, the AP has not filed a valid amended complaint.II.  DiscussionI am unable to conclude that the AP's Complaint is acceptable, because it does not comply with all of the requirements in 42 C.F.R. § 426.400 and the AP has failed to file an acceptable amended complaint within 30 days from my Order.  The regulations do not allow me to accept an incomplete complaint.  42 C.F.R. §§ 426.410(b)(1) and (2); *see generally* 42 C.F.R. §§ 426.100 through 426.490.  The regulations give an aggrieved party one opportunity to amend the complaint.  42 C.F.R. § 426.410(c)(1).  If the aggrieved party does not submit an acceptable amended complaint, then I must issue a decision dismissing the unacceptable complaint.Page 4In the present case, Dr. Schlichte indicated that the AP received the testing at issue and now seeks coverage under LCD L34914.  However, the AP's Complaint fails to include the following required information:  beneficiary-identifying information as set forth in 42 C.F.R. § 426.400(c); written authorization of Dr. Schlichte acting as T.L.'s representative; the specific provision(s) of the LCD adversely affecting T.L. as the AP; a statement from the AP explaining why he thinks that the relevant provision(s) of the LCD is (are) not valid under the reasonableness standard; and clinical or scientific evidence that support the complaint and an explanation for why the AP thinks that this evidence shows that the LCD is not reasonable.III.  ConclusionI conclude that the AP's Complaint does not meet the requirements in 42 C.F.R. § 426.400, and the AP has failed to submit an acceptable amended complaint within the timeframe determined.  Therefore, I must dismiss the Complaint, because it is not acceptable.  42 C.F.R. §§ 426.405(c)(2), and 426.410(c)(2).
  
          /s/
        Jacinta L. Alves

                      Administrative Law Judge Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back