IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 714 

Reaffirming the peaceful and collaborative resolution of maritime and jurisdictional disputes in the South China Sea and the East China Sea as 

provided for by universally recognized principles of international law, 

and reaffirming the strong support of the United States Government 

for freedom of navigation and other internationally lawful uses of sea 

and airspace in the Asia-Pacific region. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA (for himself, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. ENGEL, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, and Ms. BORDALLO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming the peaceful and collaborative resolution of maritime and jurisdictional disputes in the South China Sea 

and the East China Sea as provided for by universally 

recognized principles of international law, and reaffirming the strong support of the United States Government 

for freedom of navigation and other internationally lawful 

uses of sea and airspace in the Asia-Pacific region. 

Whereas the maritime domains of the Asia-Pacific region, 

which include both the sea and airspace above the domains, are critical to the region’s prosperity, stability, 

and security, including global commerce; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 714 IH 

Whereas the maritime domain in the Asia-Pacific region between the Pacific and Indian Oceans includes critical sea 

lines of commerce and communication; 

Whereas China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia, 

and Brunei have disputed territorial claims over the 

Spratly Islands, and China, Taiwan, and Vietnam have 

disputed territorial claims over the Paracel Islands; 

Whereas, although the United States Government is not a 

claimant in maritime disputes in either the East China 

or South China Seas, the United States has an interest 

in the peaceful diplomatic resolution of disputed claims in 

accordance with international law, in freedom of navigation and overflight, and in the free-flow of commerce free 

of coercion, intimidation, or the use of force; 

Whereas in 2002, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations 

(ASEAN) and China committed to developing an effective Code of Conduct; 

Whereas that declaration committed all parties to those territorial disputes to ‘‘reaffirm their respect for and commitment to the freedom of navigation in and over flight 

above the South China Sea as provided for by the universally recognized principles of international law’’, and to 

‘‘resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes by 

peaceful means, without resorting to the threat or use of 

force’’; 

Whereas since that time, tensions over the disputed maritime 

and territorial areas have increased; 

Whereas on September 2010, tensions escalated in the East 

China Sea near the Senkaku (Diaoyutai) Islands, a territory under the legal administration of Japan, when a 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 714 IH 

Chinese fishing vessel deliberately rammed Japanese 

Coast Guard patrol boats; 

Whereas on February 25, 2011, a frigate from the People’s 

Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) fired shots at three fishing boats from the Philippines; 

Whereas on March 2, 2011, the Government of the Philippines reported that two patrol boats from China attempted to ram one of its surveillance ships; 

Whereas on May 26, 2011, a maritime security vessel from 

China cut the cables of an exploration ship from Vietnam, the Binh Minh, in the South China Sea in waters 

near Cam Ranh Bay in the exclusive economic zone of 

Vietnam; 

Whereas on May 31, 2011, three Chinese military vessels 

used guns to threaten the crews of four Vietnamese fishing boats while they were fishing in the waters of the 

Spratly Islands; 

Whereas on June 9, 2011, three vessels from China, including one fishing vessel and two maritime security vessels, 

ran into and disabled the cables of another exploration 

ship from Vietnam, the Viking 2, in the exclusive economic zone of Vietnam; 

Whereas on July 22, 2011, an Indian naval vessel, sailing 

about 45 nautical miles off the coast of Vietnam, was 

warned by a Chinese naval vessel that it was allegedly 

violating Chinese territorial waters; 

Whereas in April 2012, tensions escalated between the Philippines and China following a standoff over the Scarborough Shoal; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HRES 714 IH 

Whereas in June 2012, China’s cabinet, the State Council, 

approved the establishment of the city of Sansha to oversee the areas claimed by China in the South China Sea; 

Whereas in July 2012, Chinese military authorities announced that they had established a corresponding 

Sansha garrison in the new prefecture; 

Whereas on June 23, 2012, the China National Offshore Oil 

Corporation invited bids for oil exploration in areas within 200 nautical miles of the continental shelf and within 

the exclusive economic zone of Vietnam; 

Whereas in January 2013, a Chinese naval ship allegedly 

fixed its weapons-targeting radar on Japanese vessels in 

the vicinity of the Senkaku islands in the East China 

Sea, and, on April 23, 2013, eight Chinese marine surveillance ships entered the 12-nautical-mile territorial 

zone off the Senkaku Islands, further escalating regional 

tensions; 

Whereas on May 9, 2013, a fatal shooting incident occurred 

in which shots fired from a Philippine Coast Guard patrol boat resulted in the death of a Taiwanese fisherman; 

Whereas on May 1, 2014, China’s state-owned energy company, CNOOC, anchored its deepwater drilling rig Hai 

Yang Shi You 981 (HD–981) in Vietnamese waters and 

deployed over 80 vessels, including seven military vessels, 

to support its provocative actions and attempt to change 

the status quo by force; 

Whereas Chinese vessels accompanying Hai Yang Shi You 

981 (HD–981) intimidated Vietnamese Coast Guard 

ships in violation of the Convention on the International 

Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, ramming 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
5 

•HRES 714 IH 

multiple Vietnamese vessels, and using helicopters and 

water cannons to obstruct others; 

Whereas on May 5, 2014, vessels from the Maritime Safety 

Administration of China (MSAC) established an exclusion 

zone with a radius of three nautical miles around Hai 

Yang Shi You 981 (HD–981); 

Whereas China’s actions in support of the Hai Yang Shi You 

981 (HD–981) drilling activity constitute a unilateral attempt to change the status quo by force; 

Whereas, without prior consultations with the United States, 

Japan, the Republic of Korea or other nations of the 

Asia-Pacific region, China declared an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) over the East China Sea on November 23, 2013; 

Whereas China announced that all aircraft, even if they do 

not intend to enter the ADIZ airspace, would have to 

submit flight plans, maintain radio contact, and follow directions from the Chinese Ministry of National Defense 

or face ‘‘emergency defensive measures’’; 

Whereas the ‘‘rules of engagement’’ declared by China, including the ‘‘emergency defensive measures’’, are in violation of the concept of ‘‘due regard for the safety of civil 

aviation’’ under the Chicago Convention of the International Civil Aviation Organization and thereby are a 

departure from accepted practice; 

Whereas China’s declaration of an ADIZ over the East China 

Sea has contributed to increased uncertainty and unsafe 

conditions in the maritime region in East Asia and the 

broader Asia-Pacific region; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
6 

•HRES 714 IH 

Whereas freedom of navigation and other lawful uses of sea 

and airspace in the Asia-Pacific region are embodied in 

international law, not granted by certain states to others; 

Whereas the United States Government expressed profound 

concerns with China’s unilateral, provocative, dangerous, 

and destabilizing declaration of such a zone, including 

the potential for misunderstandings and miscalculations 

by aircraft operating lawfully in international airspace; 

Whereas China’s declaration of an ADIZ in the East China 

Sea will not alter how the United States Government 

conducts operations in the region or the unwavering 

United States commitment to peace, security and stability in the Asia-Pacific region; 

Whereas other governments in the Asia-Pacific region, including the Governments of Japan, Korea, Philippines, Australia and Indonesia have expressed deep concern about 

China’s declaration of such a zone, regarding it as an effort to unduly infringe upon the freedom of flight in 

international airspace and to change the status quo that 

could escalate tensions and potentially cause unintentional consequences in the East China Sea; 

Whereas the United States Government does not support unilateral actions taken by any claimant seeking to change 

the status quo through the use of coercion, intimidation, 

or military force; 

Whereas the United States Government is deeply concerned 

about unilateral actions taken by any state to prevent 

any other state from exercising its sovereign rights to the 

resources of the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and continental shelf by making claims to those areas that have 

no apparent basis in international law; declarations of adVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:28 Sep 09, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR714.IH HR714

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
7 

•HRES 714 IH 

ministrative and military districts in contested areas in 

the South and East China Seas; and the imposition of 

new fishing regulations covering disputed areas, which 

have raised tensions in the region; 

Whereas international law is important to safeguard the 

rights and freedoms of all states in the Asia-Pacific region; and 

Whereas a peaceful and prosperous China, which acts as a 

responsible international stakeholder and which respects 

international laws, standards, and institutions, will enhance security and peace in the Asia-Pacific region: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) reaffirms the strong support of the United 

3 States for the peaceful resolution of maritime terri4 torial disputes in the South China Sea and the East 

5 China Sea and pledges continued efforts to facilitate 

6 a collaborative, peaceful process to resolve these dis7 putes; 

8 (2) reaffirms the strong support for freedom of 

9 navigation and over flight and condemns coercive 

10 and threatening actions or the use of force to im11 pede these freedoms in international maritime do12 mains and airspace by military or civilian vessels, to 

13 alter the status quo or to destabilize the Asia-Pacific 

14 region; 

15 (3) urges China to refrain from implementing 

16 the declared East China Sea Air Defense IdentificaVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:05 Sep 09, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR714.IH HR714

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
8 

•HRES 714 IH 

1 tion Zone (ADIZ), which is contrary to freedom of 

2 overflight in international airspace, and to refrain 

3 from taking similar provocative actions elsewhere in 

4 the Asia-Pacific region; 

5 (4) urges the Association of Southeast Asian 

6 Nations (ASEAN), all United States allies and part7 ners, and all claimants to amiably and fairly resolve 

8 these outstanding disputes, including through devel9 oping a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea; 

10 (5) supports the continuation of operations by 

11 the United States to support freedom of navigation 

12 in international waters and air space in the South 

13 China Sea and the East China Sea; and 

14 (6) encourages the continuation of efforts by 

15 the United States Government to strengthen part16 nerships in the region to build capacity for maritime 

17 domain awareness in support of freedom of naviga18 tion, maintenance of peace and stability, and respect 

19 for universally recognized principles of international 

20 law. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS