alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.3

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
                                                --------------------------------------------
                                                  NUMBER           PERCENT       EQUIVALENT
                                                 OF SHARES       OUTSTANDING       SHARES
                                                ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>             <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                            2,300,000          100.00%      2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                         2,488,572           91.14%      2,267,966
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock      15,310,943          100.00%     15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                    11,242,857          100.00%     11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                     4,323,874          100.00%      4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                      6,000,000          100.00%      6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                    (6,588)         100.00%         (6,588)
   March 2000 Debt Swap                            3,789,715           74.82%      2,835,371
   Canadian Transaction                              714,286           88.69%        633,473
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued        169,504           88.38%        149,809
   Warrants Exercised                                134,737           97.56%        131,456
                                                ------------                    ------------
                                                  46,467,900                      45,189,161

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                               45,189,161

NET LOSS                                                                        $(76,165,541)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                              $      (1.69)
                                                                                ============
</TABLE>
****


****







**NON-QUALIFIED
STOCK OPTION AWARD**


**PURSUANT
TO HABERSHAM BANCORP**


**1996
INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN**





THIS
AWARD is made as of the Grant Date by HABERSHAM BANCORP (the "Company") to
_____________ **,** (the
"Optionee").





Upon and
subject to the Terms and Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, the Company hereby awards as of the Grant Date to Optionee a
non-qualified stock option (the "Option") pursuant to the Plan, as described
below, to purchase the Option Shares.





a)
    Grant
      Date:**December
      31, ______.**





b)
    Type
      of Option: Non-Qualified Stock Option.





c)
    Plan:
      Habersham Bancorp 1996 Incentive Stock Option
Plan.





d)
    Option
      Shares: All or any part of**_____
      shares**of
      the Company's common stock, $1.00 par value per share ("Common
      Stock").





e)
    Exercise
      Price: $**________**per share of Common Stock.





f)
    Option
      Period: The Option may be exercised as to all or any portion of the Option
      Shares during the Option Period, which commences on the Grant Date and
      ends generally on the earliest of (a) the fifth (5th) anniversary of the
      Grant Date; (b) the date the Optionee experiences a Termination of
      Employment for any reason other than due to death; or (c) one (1) year
      following the date of the Optionee's death. Note that other limitations to
      exercising the Option, as described in the attached Terms and Conditions,
      may apply.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed and sealed this Award as of the Grant
Date set forth above.


HABERSHAM
      BANCORPBy:Title:





By
signing below, the Optionee hereby accepts the Award and agrees to the Terms and
Conditions attached hereto.





Optionee
Exhibit 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION UNDER

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vincent J. Milano, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of ViroPharma Incorporated;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Vincent J. Milano                
|Vincent J. Milano                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|October 27, 2010
No. 10946.

#### Yarick et al. *v.*Parker, Treasurer of Lucas County, et al.

Decided October 6, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Mr. B. A.*Hayes, for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. C. S.*Northup, city solicitor, and *Mr. O. W. Nelson*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of GIANT GROUP, LTD. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the
 Quarterly Report), I, Burt Sugarman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  | 
|------------------------ |  | 
|Dated: November 12, 2004
|                        
|/s/ Burt Sugarman       
|Chief Executive Officer
#### Jay Calendar FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-74.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 24, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7626

TYRONE CURRENCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOUGLAS STROUT, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-619-5-H) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Currence, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Currence, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Currence v. Strout , No. CA-98-619-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### James H. PRICE v. A. J. ROME.

No. 38715.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1969,

Rehearing Denied Sept. 16, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 222 So.2d 252.
#### Ernest MOCZIK and Mae Moczik, Appellants, v. TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND, of the State of Florida; The City of Naples, a Municipal Corporation; and The Naples Yacht Club, Inc., Appellees.

No. 68-522.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 16, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The data reported in this exhibit are based on unaudited statements but
include all adjustments which the company considers necessary for a fair
presentation of results for this period.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000041499
<NAME> THE GILLETTE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      76,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,418,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                56,000
<INVENTORY>                              1,823,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         4,830,000
<PP&E>                                   5,428,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           2,217,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          11,081,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,390,000
<BONDS>                                  1,760,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 91,000
<COMMON>                                 1,356,000
<OTHER-SE>                               3,866,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            11,081,000
<SALES>                                  4,350,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         4,350,000
<CGS>                                    1,665,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,665,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,656,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          34,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            989,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               349,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        640,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               640,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .56
        


</TABLE>
# C_2023127EN.01003201.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Aquind and Others v ACER

(Case T-492/21) (1)

(Energy - Competence of the ACER - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Error of law - Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 - Article 92 of the Withdrawal Agreement - Ad hoc exemption regime under Article 308 of and Annex 28 to the Trade and Cooperation Agreement)

(2023/C 127/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Aquind Ltd (London, United Kingdom), Aquind Energy Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Aquind SAS (Rouen, France) (represented by: S. Goldberg, Solicitor, and E. White, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (represented by: P. Martinet and E. Tremmel, acting as Agents, and by B. Creve, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Tamás and O. Denkov, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Lo Monaco, L. Vétillard and M.É. Sitbon, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their application based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) of 4 June 2021 concerning a request for an exemption relating to an electrical interconnector connecting the electricity transmission systems in the United Kingdom and France.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Aquind Ltd, Aquind SAS, Aquind Energy Sàrl and the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) to bear their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aquind Ltd, Aquind SAS, Aquind Energy Sàrl and the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) to bear their own costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 391, 27.9.2021.

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 34619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15482]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-
Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: July 20, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
July 16, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class 
Package Service Contract 41 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-192, CP2018-270.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-15482 Filed 7-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Gerard HANLON v. SLINE INDUSTRIAL PAINTERS, INC., and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and PPG Industries, Inc.

No. 62535.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: PPG Industries, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of *1178Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Calcasieu. 358 So.2d 700.

Writ denied. We cannot say the result is incorrect, without necessarily subscribing to the reasons.
Presidential Documents

31321 

Federal Register 

Vol. 83, No. 128 

Tuesday, July 3, 2018 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of June 4, 2018 

Delegation of Authority Under Section 709 of the Department 

of State Authorities Act, Fiscal Year 2017 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, I hereby delegate to the Secretary 

of State the authority to submit, in consultation with the Secretary of the 

Treasury, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, 

the report required under section 709 of the Department of State Authorities 

Act, Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–323) (the ‘‘Act’’), as amended. 

The delegation in this memorandum shall apply to any provision of any 

future public law that is the same or substantially the same as section 

709 of the Act. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 4, 2018 

[FR Doc. 2018–14485 

Filed 7–2–18; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCSTrump.EPS</GPH>
#### Sebastian County vs. Sutton et al.

Where no motion for a new trial has been made, nor any question of law reserved at the trial, there is nothing before this court for adjudication.

The rule established in *State Bank vs. Conway,*13 *Ark. 344*— which *is simple, and easily understood and followed*— applies as well to cases submitted to the court as to a jury; and to casos where there is an agreed statement of facts, as where the facts are proved by witnesses.

*Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court.*

Hon. Felix I. Batson, Circuit Judge.

G. J. Clark, for appellant.

Hon. Chief Justice English

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment in this case must be affirmed under the rule of practice settled in *State Bank vs. Conway,*13 *Ark.*344—which was applied in *Gardner vs. Miller et al.,*(present term,) a case similar to this.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22431-22432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9768]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities; Arts and 
Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the 
Arts and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506, in Room 730, from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., on 
Thursday, May 13, 2010.
    The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for 
Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts 
and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after July 1, 2010.
    Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial 
data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of 
transportation and security measures

[[Page 22432]]

confidential, pursuant to the authority granted me by the Chairman's 
Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee Meetings, dated 
July 19, 1993, I have determined that the meeting would fall within 
exemption (4) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and that it is essential to close the 
meeting to protect the free exchange of views and to avoid interference 
with the operations of the Committee.
    It is suggested that those desiring more specific information 
contact Advisory Committee Management Officer, Michael P. McDonald, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/606-
8322.

Michael P. McDonald,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-9768 Filed 4-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
                                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          NUMBER                    PERCENT                  EQUIVALENT
                                                         OF SHARES                OUTSTANDING                  SHARES
                                                       ---------------           ---------------           ---------------
<S>                                                    <C>                       <C>                       <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                      2,300,000                    100.00%                2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                   1,074,725                    100.00%                1,074,725
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock                15,310,943                    100.00%               15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                              11,242,857                    100.00%               11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                               4,323,874                    100.00%                4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                                6,000,000                    100.00%                6,000,000
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                  127,399                     87.23%                  111,124
   Warrants Exercised                                           49,450                    100.00%                   49,450
                                                       ---------------                                     ---------------
                                                            40,429,248                                          40,412,973

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                             40,412,973

NET LOSS                                                                                                      (25,348,032)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                                         $         (0.63)
                                                                                                           ===============
</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1227

To make technical corrections to emergency unemployment benefits provisions.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. WOFFORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To make technical corrections to emergency unemployment

benefits provisions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subclauses (II) and (III) of sec4 tion 102(b)(2)(A)(v) of the Emergency Unemployment

5 Compensation Act of 1991 are amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(II) The requirements of this

7 subclause are met for any week if the

8 national rate of total unemployment

9 (seasonally adjusted) for each of the 2

10 most recent calendar months (not

11 averaged) for which data are pub-
2

S 1227 IS

1 lished before the close of such week is

2 less than 7 percent, and if the re3 quirements of subclause (III) are not

4 met for such week.

5 ‘‘(III) The requirements of this

6 subclause are met for any week if the

7 national rate of total unemployment

8 (seasonally adjusted) for each of the 2

9 most recent calendar months (not

10 averaged) for which data are pub11 lished before the close of such week is

12 less than 6.8 percent.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 subsection (a) shall apply as if included in the amend15 ments made by section 101(b) of the Unemployment Com16 pensation Amendments of 1992.

Æ