alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022148EN.01001101.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli (Italy) lodged on 15 December 2021 — VB v Comune di Portici

(Case C-777/21)

(2022/C 148/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Napoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: VB

Respondent: Comune di Portici

Question referred

Is the Italian State’s legislation (in this case, Article 93(1-bis) and (7-bis) of Legislative Decree No 285/1992) contrary to Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in that it prohibits a self-employed worker resident in Italy for more than 60 days from travelling in that State in a vehicle registered in another Member State regularly used by that individual to travel and move about in the two Member States — the State of residence and the State where the vehicle is registered — in order to practise his profession (and for reasons relating to his private life)?

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    39875
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      22606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                111690
<PP&E>                                           21693
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  147380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           137214
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                        5719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    147380
<SALES>                                          38481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 38481
<CGS>                                            34142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    34142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    854
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                694
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31974-31975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14724]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY920000. L51040000.FI0000. 18XL5017AR]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
WYW087880, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As provided for under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 
amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement of competitive oil and gas lease WYW087880 from Samson 
Resources Company for land in Converse County, Wyoming. The lessee 
filed the petition on time, along with all rentals due since the lease 
terminated under the law. No leases affecting this land were issued 
before the petition was filed. The BLM proposes to reinstate the lease.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Hite, Branch Chief for Fluid 
Minerals Adjudication, Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State Office, 
5353 Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 82003; phone 
307-775-6176; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4c7cccdd0c1e4c6c8c98ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7c4cfced3c2e7c5cbca89c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf may call 
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Hite 
during normal business hours. The FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 
days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. 
A reply will be sent during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee agreed to the amended lease terms 
for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre, or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16 \2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and the $159 cost of 
publishing this notice. The lessee voluntarily agreed to one additional 
lease stipulation to protect cultural and scenic values of the Bozeman 
Trail. The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease 
per Sec. 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 
188). The BLM proposes to reinstate the lease effective April 1, 2016, 
under the amended terms and conditions of the lease and the increased 
rental and royalty rates cited above.


[[Page 31975]]


    Authority:  30 U.S.C. 188 (e)(4) and 43 CFR 3108.2-3 (b)(2)(v).

Christopher Hite,
Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 2018-14724 Filed 7-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Medizone International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin G. Marshall, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edwin G. Marshall Edwin G. Marshall, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  Date: March 12, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   SLC_335724.1
#### STATE EX REL. ST. PAUL GAS LIGHT COMPANY v. MINNESOTA TAX COMMISSION.1

April 28, 1916.

Nos. 19,809—(21).

Case followed.

Upon the relation of the St. Paul Gas Light Company this court granted its alternative writ of *certiorari*directed to 'Samuel Lord, J. G. Armson and J. T. Hale, as the Minnesota Tax Commission, to review the proceedings of that commission in the matter of the application of relator to the county board and county auditor of Ramsey county and to the Minnesota Tax Commission for a reduction of assessed valuation of personal property.

Discharged.

*Cobb, Wheelwright é Dille*and *Thomas F. Fitzpatrick,*for relator.

*Lyndon A. Smith,*Attorney General, and *Egbert 8. Oakley,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 157 N. W. 639.

Per Curiam.

The facts in this case are identical with those presented in the foregoing case of State v. Minnesota Tax Commission, supra, page 419, 157 N. W. 638, and the conclusion there reached is followed and applied. The order of the tax commission is sustained, and the writ discharged.
#### Dominic Laudisio et al., Respondents, v Diamond D Construction Corporation, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 207]

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costa and cross motion denied. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in granting the alternative request in plaintiffs’ cross motion for an order compelling further discovery on the issue of the workers’ compensation defense asserted by defendant. We agree. Plaintiffs commenced this action in June 1992, and defendant raised the workers’ compensation issue as an affirmative defense in its answer. Plaintiffs filed the note of issue and statement of readiness in September 1995, more than four years before their instant cross motion. “[A]bsent special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances spelled out factually, the motion court lacks discretion to permit further discovery after the note of issue and statement of readiness have been filed” *(Gould v Marone,*197 AD2d 862; *see, 10 Park Sq. Assocs. v The Travelers,*266 AD2d 859; *Melanson v Caggiano,*251 AD2d 1059). Plaintiffs failed to explain their failure to seek such discovery before the filing of the note of issue *(see, Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini,*265 AD2d 135, 140). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mahoney, J. — Discovery.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.
#### William Norman BOSTON v. BERTRAM YACHT DIVISION.

No. 38707.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1969.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
#### Delfin J. QUESADA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 3, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 1973.

Julio R. Ferrer, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lynn Richard Mattaway, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ-, and MELVIN, WOODROW M„ Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Floyd v. State, Fla.1962, 139 So.2d 873; Bretti v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 225 So.2d 516.
# C_2022237EN.01005201.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/52

---

Order of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Retail Royalty v EUIPO — Fashion Energy (Representation of an eagle)

(Case T-226/21) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 237/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Retail Royalty Co. (Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) (represented by: J. Bogatz and Y. Stone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Fashion Energy Srl (Milan, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2021 (Case R 2813/2019-5), relating to cancellation proceedings between Fashion Energy and Retail Royalty.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Retail Royalty Co. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Retail Royalty Co. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 14.6.2021.

---
256 La. 621

#### Catherine Bennett FRIERSON et al. v. *George*W. FALGOUT, Venson Seal, Individually and as Administrator of the estate of Harold Seal et al.

No. 50699.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 29, 1970.

In re: Catherine Bennett Frierson, wife of/and Alvin W. Frierson, Sr. and Huey Faciane, Individually and on behalf of his minor son, Randy Faciane applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany. 234 So.2d 842.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Annual
Report of China Nutrifruit Group Limited, a Nevada corporation (the Company),
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Colman Cheng, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to her knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company. June 30, 2009/s/ Colman
ChengColman ChengChief Financial Officer(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) [A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to China Nutrifruit Group Limited and will be
retained by China Nutrifruit Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 32-2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen R. Wherry, Senior Vice President, Treasurer, Assistant Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Goldfield Corporation and
will be retained by The Goldfield Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/S/    STEPHEN R.
WHERRYStephen R. Wherry Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer),Treasurer and Assistant SecretaryMay 6, 2010
The Partners
            T. Rowe Price Realty Income Fund I,
            A No-Load Limited Partnership:

            We have  audited the  accompanying balance  sheets of  T. Rowe
            Price Realty Income Fund I, A  No-Load Limited Partnership  as
            of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements  of
            operations,  partners' capital and  cash flows for each of the
            years in the three-year  period ended September 30, 1996.   In
            connection   with our audits  of the  aforementioned financial
            statements, we also have audited  the information included  in
            the related  financial statement schedule as  of and for  each
            of the  years  in the  three-year period  ended September  30,
            1996.   These  financial  statements and  financial  statement
            schedule  are   the   responsibility   of  the   Partnership's
            management.   Our responsibility is to  express an opinion  on
            these  financial statements  and financial  statement schedule
            based on our audits.

            We conducted our audits in  accordance with generally accepted
            auditing standards.  Those standards require that we plan  and
            perform  the  audit   to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about
            whether  the  financial  statements  and  financial  statement
            schedule  are  free  of  material   misstatement.    An  audit
            includes examining, on a test  basis, evidence supporting  the
            amounts  and disclosures  in  the  financial  statements.   An
            audit also  includes assessing the  accounting principles used
            and  significant estimates  made  by  management,  as well  as
            evaluating the overall  financial statement presentation.   We
            believe that  our audits  provide a reasonable  basis for  our
            opinion.

            In  our opinion,  the financial  statements referred  to above
            present  fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
            position of  T. Rowe  Price Realty  Income Fund  I, A  No-Load
            Limited  Partnership as  of September  30, 1996  and 1995, and
            the  results of its operations and its cash  flows for each of
            the  years in the three-year period ended  September 30, 1995,
            in conformity with  generally accepted  accounting principles.
            Also, in  our opinion, the information included in the related
            financial statement schedule as  of and for each of the  years
            in  the  three-year  period  ended  September  30,  1996  when
            considered  in  relation  to  the  basic financial  statements
            taken  as a  whole, present fairly, in  all material respects,
            the information set forth therein.

            Chicago, Illinois
            October 23, 1996
#### A. P. HUNT v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 6143.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Jan. 16, 1937.

Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On motion of counsel for respondent, and upon consideration of the Certificate of the clerk of the United States Board of Tax Appeals filed this day, it is ordered and adjudged that this cause be docketed in this court and the petition for review of decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals entered on March 21, 1936, be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
#### In re ESTATE of Katie PRUNCUTZ, Deceased. Eli Jerry PRUNCUTZ, et al., Appellants, v. Lina PUTIN, as Executrix of the Estate of Katie Pruncutz, Appellee.

No. 70-592.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 14, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 21.1



EXAR CORPORATION

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|1. |  | Exar Japan Corporation (a Japan corporation).
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------



|2. |  | Micro Power Systems, Inc. (a California corporation).
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------



|3. |  | Exar Ltd. (a United Kingdom Limited Liability corporation).
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



|4. |  | Exar SARL (a French Limited Liability corporation).
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------



|5. |  | Exar (Delaware) Corporation Shanghai Representative Office.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
263 La. 101

#### George KARAM v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO. and A. E. Darbonne, Jr.

No. 52882.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 19, 1972.

In re: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and A. E. Darbonne, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline. 265 So.2d 821.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
# C_2023216EN.01004201.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2023 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM)

(Case T-549/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark ROCHEM - Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE - Relative ground for invalidity - Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark - Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2023/C 216/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rochem Group AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rochem Marine Srl (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: R. Gioia and L. Mansi, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 June 2021 (Case R 1547/2019-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rochem Group AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rochem Group AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.

---
#### Frank P. KLOSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-698.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 28, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Raymond GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. James Harry COCHRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 72-447, 72-446.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
astra_ex104.htm

  EXHIBIT 10.4
  
  
  
 	 
	1
	

	 

  
 
  
 	 
	2
	

	 

  
  
 
 	 
	3
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	4
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	5
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	6
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	7
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	8
	

	 

   
  
  
   
 	 
	9
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	10
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	11
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	12
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	13
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	14
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	15
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	16
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	17
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	 18
#### HANEY CHEVROLET, INC., Appellant, v. Calvin L. JONES and Nikki Jones, his wife, Appellee.

No. 72-1022.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.