alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice
130585 (53) Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. MICHAEL FRANCIS SPITZLEY, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the ESTATE OF DAVID A. Justices SPITZLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130585 COA: 255345 Clinton CC: 03-009578-CZ THOMAS P. SPITZLEY and KIMBERLY S. SPITZLEY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s January 12, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

M ARKMAN , J., dissents and states as follows:

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement in Spitzley v Spitzley , 477 Mich ___ (2007), I would grant the motion for reconsideration, reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and strike the sanctions against defendants.

K ELLY and C ORRIGAN , JJ., join the statement of M ARKMAN , J.

t0314 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 21, 2007

Clerk
#### BASIC FOOD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. K A R PRINTING OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-328.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 7, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 28, 1972.

Diaz-Asper, Katzen & Chulock, South Miami, for appellant.

Yelen & Yelen, Coral Gables, for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Farish v. Lum’s, Inc., Fla. 1972, 267 So.2d 325.
# C_2022198EN.01004301.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Lea Nature Services v EUIPO — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO ...?)

(Case T-197/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark SO ...? - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Lack of descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2022/C 198/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lea Nature Services (Périgny, France) (represented by: F. Drageon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: J. Quirin and J. P. Jacquey, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 February 2021 (Case R 1234/2020 4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Lea Nature Services and Debonair Trading Internacional.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Lea Nature Services to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lea Nature Services to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.

---
# C_2022472EN.01004001.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2022 — Philip Morris Products v EUIPO (Representation of angular lines in black and white)

(Case T-501/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark representing angular lines in black and white - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 472/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Philip Morris Products SA (Neuchâtel, Switzerland) (represented by: L. Alonso Domingo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Georgieva, E. Nicolás Gómez, M. Eberl and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 June 2021 (Case R 79/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Philip Morris Products SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Philip Morris Products SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 391, 27.9.2021.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131143 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131143 

 COA: 258149 

Gratiot CC: 03-004633-FC 

DANIEL CLARE RADEMACHER, 03-004634-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. David B. KELLY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53908.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 1973.

In re: David B. Kelly applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction. See evidence at hearing.
Exhibit 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       SECURED DIGITAL APPLICATIONS, INC.

     Pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  Section  242  of  the  Delaware  General
Corporations Code, Secured Digital  Applications,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation
(the "Corporation"),  adopts the following articles of amendment to its articles
of incorporation:

     1. The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation is
hereby amended by replacing paragraph "(a)" in Article IV:

          (a)  Authorized  Capital  Stock.  The total  number of shares of stock
which the  Corporation  shall have authority to issue is  351,000,000  shares of
capital stock,  consisting of (i) 350,000,000  shares of common stock, par value
$0.00001 per share (the "Common  Stock") and (ii) 1,000,000  shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.10 per share (the "Preferred Stock").

     2. This  Articles of Amendment to the  Articles of  Incorporation  has been
duly adopted by the  unanimous  written  consent of the  Corporation's  Board of
Directors and a majority of the  Corporation's  stockholders  in accordance with
the provisions of the Delaware  General  Corporations Law and the By-Laws of the
Corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  this Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated
Articles of  Incorporation  to be signed by its Secretary of the Board this 20th
day of July, 2004.

                                 SECURED DIGITAL APPLICATIONS, INC.


                                 By:/S/ Valerie Hoi-Fah Looi
                                    --------------------------------
                                    Valerie Hoi-Fah Looi, Secretary
FINAL REGULATION ORDER

AIRBORNE TOXIC CONTROL MEASURE FOR

AUXILIARY DIESEL ENGINES OPERATED ON

OCEAN-GOING VESSELS AT- BERTH IN A CALIFORNIA PORT

Adopt new section 2299.3, title 13, chapter 5.1, Ca lifornia Code of Regulations (CCR), to read as follows:

(Note: The entire text of section 2299.3 is new la nguage.):

Section 2299.3. Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Auxiliary Diesel Engines Operated on Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth in a California Port.

(a) Any person who owns, operates, charters, rents , or leases any U.S. or foreign-flagged container vessel, passenger vessel, or refrigerated cargo vessel that visits a California port, as defined in sectio n 93118.3(c), title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), must comply with section 93118.3 (subject to the exemptions therein), relating to the operation of a uxiliary diesel engines on ocean-going vessels at-berth in a California port. In addition, this section also applies to any person who owns or operates a port o r terminal located at a California port, as defined in section 93118.3(c)(6 ), where container, passenger, or refrigerated cargo vessels visit.

(b) This section shall not be construed as expandi ng or limiting either the application or requirements of section 93118.3, tit le 17, CCR, but is intended to alert affected persons of the requirements regardin g the operation of auxiliary diesel engines on ocean-going vessels at-berth in a California port and other provisions in that section.

NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 3965 0, 39658, 39659, 39666 and 41511, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sect ions 39650, 39658, 39659, 39666, 41510, and 41511, Health and Safety Code.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,593,224
<SECURITIES>                                25,971,448
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,177,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (652,925)
<INVENTORY>                                     92,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               890,388
<PP&E>                                       5,842,072
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,734,724)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,187,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,829,806
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,766
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,230,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,187,261
<SALES>                                      3,122,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,122,402
<CGS>                                        2,808,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,944,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,307,295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,773
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,309,068)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David James MELANCON.

No. 62563.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: David James Melancon, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Lafayette.

Writ granted. The order of the district court denying the withdrawal of the plea of guilty is reversed, and the case is remanded.'

SANDERS, C. J.,

dissents, being of the opinion the trial judge did not abuse his discretion.

SUMMERS, J.

Although I agree this writ should be granted, I cannot agree to the ex parte order setting aside the guilty plea without a hearing in this court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1261 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1261

  To authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1994 and 1995 for the 
     Board for International Broadcasting, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 20 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Mr. Pell (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1994 and 1995 for the 
     Board for International Broadcasting, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Board for International Broadcasting 
Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 8(a)(1)(A) of the Board for International Broadcasting Act 
of 1973 (22 U.S.C. 287(a)(1)(A)) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(A) $220,000,000 for fiscal year 1994 and such 
                sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 1995 and such 
                additional amounts for each such fiscal year as may be 
                necessary to offset adverse fluctuations in foreign 
                currency exchange rates; and''.

                                 <all>
```
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 752 

Congratulating Marcel Closset, a French citizen and former member of the 

French Resistance who was instrumental in saving a United States 

Army Air Corps pilot during World War II, for receiving the French 

Legion of Honor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Mr. O’ROURKE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Marcel Closset, a French citizen and former 

member of the French Resistance who was instrumental 

in saving a United States Army Air Corps pilot during 

World War II, for receiving the French Legion of Honor. 

Whereas, on September 27, 2014, Marcel Closset, a French 

citizen and former member of the French Resistance, received the French Legion of Honor in the rank of 

Knight; 

Whereas the French Legion of Honor was created by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1802 to recognize the accomplishments 

of military personnel and civilians for their service to 

France; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 752 IH 

Whereas the French Legion of Honor is the highest-ranking 

order and decoration given in France; 

Whereas, on July 17, 2014, the President of France nominated Marcel Closset for the French Legion of Honor to 

commemorate the 70th anniversary of the liberation of 

France during World War II; 

Whereas Marcel Closset is the current president of L’Amicale 

des Anciens du maquis de Mazinghien, an association 

that works to preserve the memory of the members of the 

French Resistance who fought for the liberation of 

Mazinghien, France, in 1944; and 

Whereas Marcel Closset was one of four people who risked 

their lives to rescue and hide Eliot Shapleigh, Sr., a 

United States Army Air Corps pilot from El Paso, Texas, 

who was forced to parachute from his crippled P–51 

Mustang into Nazi-occupied France in 1944: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Marcel Closset for receiving the French Legion 

3 of Honor. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33222-33223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15094]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Determination Concerning a Petition To Add a Class of Employees 
to the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and 
Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice of a determination concerning a petition to 
add a class of employees from the Feed Materials Production Center 
(FMPC), in Fernald, Ohio, to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under 
the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 
2000 (EEOICPA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 1-877-222-7570. Information 
requests can also be submitted by email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3e7e0e2f0e3e0e7e08de4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="286c6b697b686b6c6b066f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 21, 2018, the Secretary of HHS

[[Page 33223]]

determined that the following class of employees does not meet the 
statutory criteria for addition to the SEC as authorized under EEOICPA:

    ``(1) All employees of the Department of Energy (DOE), its 
predecessor agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors who 
worked in any area of the Feed Materials Production Center at 
Fernald, Ohio, from January 1, 1984, through December 31, 1989; and 
(2) all employees of the DOE, its predecessor agencies, National 
Lead of Ohio, or NLO, Inc., in any area of the Feed Materials 
Production Center from January 1, 1979, through December 31, 1983.''

    Authority: 42 U.S.C.7384q.

 John J. Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2018-15094 Filed 7-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2022119EN.01004801.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/48

---

Order of the General Court of 21 January 2022 — Santos v EUIPO (Shape of a citrus press)

(Case T-574/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 119/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Santos (Vaulx-en-Velin, France) (represented by: C. Bey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 July 2021 (Case R 281/2020-1), relating to an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a citrus press as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Santos. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Santos.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 15.11.2021.

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 136 (Monday, July 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-71-2018]


Approval of Subzone Status; VF Outdoor, LLC; Ontario, Santa Fe 
Springs and Corona, California

    On May 9, 2018, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones 
(FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port of Long 
Beach, grantee of FTZ 50, requesting subzone status subject to the 
existing activation limit of FTZ 50, on behalf of VF Outdoor, LLC, in 
Ontario, Santa Fe Springs and Corona, California.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (83 FR 22441, May 15, 2018). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed 
the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. 
Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive 
Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 
50R was approved on July 10, 2018, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to 
FTZ 50's 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Dated: July 10, 2018.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15113 Filed 7-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P