alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,794
<SECURITIES>                                   129,287
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,970
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,243
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    96 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,893
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,893
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,893
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE
901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.
100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR
EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

February 9, 2015

Hon. Gilberto Hinojosa Attorney at Law

622 E. St. Charles St.
Brownsville, TX 78520

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Jerad Najvar Attorney at Law 4151 Southwest Freeway, Ste. 625
Houston, TX 77027

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 14

- 00581

- CV

Tr.Ct.No. C

- 6914

- 13

- G Style: Lupe Rivera v. Leticia "Letty" Lopez

Dear Sir/Madam:

Appellee’s motion for leave to file sur

- reply brief in the above cause was this day GRANTED by this Court. The brief has been ordered filed as of February 2, 2015

, the date of receipt.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33276-33277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15292]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 19, 2018.

[[Page 33277]]


PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing Room 10800.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 551-5400.

    Dated: July 12, 2018.
Lynn M. Powalski,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15292 Filed 7-13-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Dorothy P. BEYER, Appellant, v. Lewis W. BEYER, Jr., Appellee.

No. 70-185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 24, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 24, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0079. AUTO ONE PLUS et al. v. CYNTHIA GRAHAM .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2015A3025
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1087

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession of a

handgun or ammunition by, or the private transfer of a handgun or

ammunition to, a juvenile.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 9 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1993

Mr. KOHL (for himself, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr.

LAUTENBERG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession of a handgun or ammunition by, or the private

transfer of a handgun or ammunition to, a juvenile.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Youth Handgun Safety

5 Act of 1993’’.
2

•S 1087 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF THE POSSESSION OF A HANDGUN

2 OR AMMUNITION BY, OR THE PRIVATE

3 TRANSFER OF A HANDGUN OR AMMUNITION

4 TO, A JUVENILE.

5 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 921(a) of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(29) The term ‘handgun’ means—

9 ‘‘(A) a firearm that has a short stock and

10 is designed to be held and fired by the use of

11 a single hand; and

12 ‘‘(B) any combination of parts from which

13 a firearm described in subparagraph (A) can be

14 assembled.’’.

15 (b) OFFENSE.—Section 922 of title 18, United States

16 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

17 subsection:

18 ‘‘(s)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell,

19 deliver, or transfer to a juvenile—

20 ‘‘(A) a handgun; or

21 ‘‘(B) ammunition that is suitable for use only

22 in a handgun.

23 ‘‘(2) It shall be unlawful for any person who is a juve24 nile to possess—

25 ‘‘(A) a handgun; or
3

•S 1087 IS

1 ‘‘(B) ammunition that is suitable for use only

2 in a handgun.

3 ‘‘(3) This subsection does not apply to a temporary

4 transfer to, or possession by—

5 ‘‘(A) a juvenile when the handgun is being used

6 in target practice under the supervision of an adult

7 who is not prohibited by Federal, State, or local law

8 from possessing a firearm or in the course of in9 struction in the traditional and proper use of the

10 handgun under the supervision of such an adult; or

11 ‘‘(B) a juvenile who is a member of the Armed

12 Forces of the United States or the National Guard

13 who possesses or is armed with a handgun in the

14 line of duty.

15 ‘‘(4) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘juve16 nile’ means a person who is less than 18 years of age.’’.

17 (c) PENALTY.—Section 924(a) of title 18, United

18 States Code, is amended—

19 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)

20 or (3) of’’; and

21 (2) by adding at the end the following new

22 paragraph:

23 ‘‘(5) A person who knowingly violates section 922(s)

24 shall be fined not more than $1,000, imprisoned for not

25 more than 1 year, or both.’’.
4

•S 1087 IS

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 31, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00507

- CR

Marlene LEVEN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR4845A

Honorable Ron Rangel , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on August 31, 2022

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 31st day of August, 2022

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Melvin TEAL.

No. 52994.

Supreme Court of Louisiana,

Feb. 22, 1973.

On motion of Albert L. Boudreau, Jr., appearing herein as the attorney representing the indigent defendant Melvin Teal, and on suggestion to the Court that the 15th Judicial District Court, Carrol L. Spell presiding, has released the defendant from prison rendering this matter moot since the writs herein had issued for a hearing on a writ of habeas corpus and on suggestion to the Court that Melvin Teal is no longer residing in the Parish of Vermilion nor is he in communication with undersigned counsel and that his whereabouts are unknown:

Ordered that the proceedings in this matter seeking a writ of habeas corpus be and they are hereby dismissed having been rendered moot by the release of the applicant from incarceration.
---

|Consent of Independent Auditor    | Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton
      LLP
|--------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|Suite 2000                       
|National Bank Tower              
|600 De La Gauchetière Street West
|Montréal, Québec H3B 4L8         
|                                 
|Telephone: 514-878-2691          
|Fax: 514-878-2127                
|www.rcgt.com                     

We have issued our independent auditors report dated November
7, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the
Annual Report of Sand Technology Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended July 31,
2011. We hereby consent to the incorporation of said report in the Form 20-F,
and to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of Sand Technology Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-08538, effective
March 27, 1998 and File No. 333-07462, effective August 20, 1997) and Form F-3
(File No. 333-51014, effective August 18, 2000).

Montréal, Canada,November 11, 2011

______________________________1Chartered
accountant auditor permit no. 20518

Chartered AccountantsMember of Grant Thornton International Ltd

---
[No. 215-3.

Division Three.

February 23, 1972.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Donald F. England, *Appellant.*
I - 1 

### Appendix I

Survey of Ferry Vessel Owner/Operators

During the first two weeks of November 2007, Air Re sources Board (Board or ARB) staff conducted a phone survey of ferry vessel owner/oper ators to estimate the engine model year distribution of California ferries. The surve y was conducted in response to the Board’s instruction to evaluate the possibility of accelerating the replacement of later model year (1996-1999) Tier 0 ferry diesel engines from the 2015-2016 time frame to 2014. The direction applied only to ferries with h ome ports outside the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as the origina lly proposed schedule provided for replacement of all Tier 0 engines on SCAQMD ferries prior to 2014. The purpose of the survey was to estimate the number of ferry engines that would be impacted by the change proposed by the Board.

Staff contacted nine California ferry operators and obtained information on a total of 35 ferries, as shown in Table I-1 below. Staff est imates that these represent approximately half of the total state-wide ferry fl eet. Of these 35 ferries, 4 ferries outside the SCAQMD have propulsion engines in the 1996-1999 model year range. Based on this survey, less than 10 ferries statewide would be imp acted by this schedule acceleration.

Table I-1 Survey Results: Number of Ferry Vessels by Area and

Propulsion Engine Model Year

Engine Model Year Home Port in

SCAQMD Home Port

Outside SCAQMD Total

Pre-1996 (Tier 0) 5 2 7

1996-1999 (Tier 0) 1 4 5

2000 (Tier 1) 4 4

Post-2000 (Tier 1) 4 10 14

2007+ (Tier 2) 1 4 5

Total 11 24 35
Order entered December 1, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00422-CV

ALAN D. GERTNER, IRA, Appellant

V.

HQZ PARTNERS, L.P., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-03044-H

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ November 25, 2015 second motion for an extension of 

time to file a brief. Appellees’ brief was timely filed on November 30, 2015. Accordingly, we 

DENY the motion as moot.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1002

___________________________

In re: Bryan S. Reichel, as surety for Rudy, Inc., as surety for Pure Choice, Inc., 

formerly doing business as America’s Team Properties

lllllllllllllllllllllDebtor

------------------------------ 

Bryan S. Reichel

lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant

v.

Mary Jo Anne Jensen-Carter, U.S. Trustee

lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee

____________

Appeal from United States Bankruptcy

Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit

____________

Submitted: June 12, 2023

Filed: June 23, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

 

Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
-2-

Bryan Reichel accuses the former United States Trustee of improperly seizing 

assets and allowing fraudulent claims in his now-closed bankruptcy case. The 

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the bankruptcy court’s1 denial of various 

motions and its decision not to reopen the case. Having carefully reviewed the 

record and the arguments on appeal, we affirm the judgment.2

 See, e.g., 11 U.S.C. 

§ 101(5)(A) (providing that a “right to payment” need not be “reduced to judgment” 

or “undisputed” to count as a “claim”); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001(c)(2)(D)(ii) 

(authorizing the bankruptcy court to determine “appropriate relief” when a proof of 

claim lacks supporting information). 

______________________________

1

The Honorable Katherine A. Constantine, Chief Judge, United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota.

2

We also deny the pending motion for oral argument.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40283 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TONY RAY MCDOWELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-99-CR-177-2

- - - - - - - - - -

April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Tony Ray McDowell has requested

leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McDowell filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief, McDowell’s

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 581

Relating to early organization of the House of Representatives for the One

Hundred Fourth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. GEPHARDT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relating to early organization of the House of

Representatives for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

1 Resolved, That any organizational caucus or con2 ference in the House of Representatives for the One Hun3 dred Fourth Congress may begin on or after November

4 27, 1994.

5 SEC. 2. As used in this resolution, the term ‘‘organi6 zational caucus or conference’’ means a party caucus or

7 conference authorized to be called under section 202(a)

8 of House Resolution 988, Ninety-third Congress, agreed

9 to on October 8, 1974, and enacted into permanent law
2

HRES 581 ATH

1 by chapter III of title I of the Supplemental Appropria2 tions Act, 1975 (2 U.S.C. 29a(a)).
**Exhibit      13.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:              June 19, 2007 | /s/                Leif JohanssonName:                Leif JohanssonTitle:                  President and ChiefExecutive                  Officer |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                June 19, 2007 | /s/                Pär Östberg          Name:                  Pär ÖstbergTitle:                  Senior Vice President and Chief                  Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Jimmie Lee HARRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-441.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 15, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Steven Rappaport, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Lance R. Stelzer, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a revocation of probation and a sentence of six months in the Dade County Jail to be followed by a one year probation. It is urged that the evidence of the violation of probation was insufficient, but we find that the evidence before the trial judge is adequate inasmuch as the trier of fact may consider and reject evidence which is contrary to that of the State’s witnesses. See State v. Young, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 567.

The State concedes and we find that the sentence is illegal. See Fla.Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A. See also Williams v. State, Fla.App.1973, 280 So.2d 518. Thereupon, the judgment is affirmed, and the sentence is amended by striking therefrom the provision for probation, and as amended the sentence is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Submitted on record and briefs August 20,

reversed and remanded with directions September 29, 1969

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*FRANCIS LEE CHATMAN, *Appellant.*

459 P2d 442

*Gary D. Babcock,*Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry, Fort and Branchfield, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a conviction upon trial by jury of contributing to the delinquency of a minor *79in violation of OES 167.210. Subsequent to Ms conviction, the Supreme Court of Oregon held unconstitutional that portion of OES 167.210 upon which the conviction was based. *State v. Hodges,*254 Or 21, 457 P2d 491 (1969). In light of *Hodges,*the state concedes prejudicial error in tMs case. The cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to discharge the defendant in tMs proceeding and for reference to the grand jury in the event that the prosecution determines it proper to proceed under another statute.

Eeversed and remanded with directions.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. §1350)



I, Wayne B. Fuquay, of Analytical Surveys, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2003 (the
Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Analytical Surveys, Inc.



Dated: August 12, 2004

|                                                      |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                     
|/s/ Wayne B. Fuquay                                  
|Wayne B. Fuquay President and Chief Executive Officer