alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1236 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1236

  To reauthorize the National Women's Business Council, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 15 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Bumpers) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small 
                                Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the National Women's Business Council, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Women's Business Council 
Reauthorization Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. MEMBERSHIP.

    (a) New Members.--Section 403 of the Women's Business Ownership Act 
of 1988 (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``nine'' and inserting ``eleven'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``, the 
                Secretary of Labor (or such Secretary's deputy),'' 
                after ``(or such Secretary's deputy)'';
                    (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end of the paragraph;
                    (D) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (E) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
            ``(4) one member shall be appointed by the President.''.
    (b) Terms of Current Members.--Any member appointed under paragraph 
(2) or (3) of section 403(a) of the Women's Business Ownership Act of 
1988 (15 U.S.C. 631 note) and serving prior to the date of enactment of 
this Act shall continue to serve until the expiration of the term for 
which the member was appointed.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 407 of the Women's Business Ownership Act of 1988 (15 
U.S.C. 631 note) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 407. AUTHORIZATION.

    ``(a) There are authorized to be appropriated $500,000 for each of 
the fiscal years 1994 and 1995.
    ``(b) New spending authority or authority to enter into contracts 
as authorized in this Act shall be effective only to such extent and in 
such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts.
    ``(c) This title shall cease to be effective 2 years after the date 
of enactment of the National Women's Business Council Reauthorization 
Act of 1993.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:





(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 20013 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 18, 2015/s/Larry VanceLarry VanceChief Executive Officer





This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:13 AM

To: 'pjensen@entint.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: Enterprise Integration, LLC (FAA-2015-2660)



### Dear Mr. Jensen:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-2660). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), m odel(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) sh ould include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by September 30, 2015. If we do not rece ive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
EXHIBIT 10.39



AMENDMENT NUMBER 3

TO THE

COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN

(the Plan)



Pursuant to Section 7.2 of the Plan, Community
Bancshares, Inc. hereby amends the Plan, effective as of October 1, 2004, by adding to the end of Sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.4 and 4.5 the following:



Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, determination of benefits under this Plan under optional forms of payment will continue to be
based on the actuarial factors in effect in the pension plan prior to October 1, 2004, and the revised actuarial factors adopted for the pension plan effective October 1, 2004 shall not apply in determining benefits under this Plan.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Community Bancshares, Inc. has caused this Amendment
Number 3 to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of this 1st day of September, 2004 to be effective as provided above.



COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.By:

/s/ Patrick M. FrawleyPatrick M. FrawleyChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President




|                       
|-----------------------
|ATTEST:                
|                       
|/s/ William H. Caughran
|Its Secretary
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER








I, Mary G. Merritt, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Preferred Voice, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:





a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c. presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: August 4, 2010
By:
/s/ Mary G. MerrittMary G. MerrittChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00453

- CV

Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas and Travis County, Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY,
NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 16

- 000370, THE HON O RABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The stay issued in this ca se on March 6, 2020

, is lifted

.

I t is ordered on January 14, 2021

.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justice s T riana and Smith
#### CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. Burnell Melvin YANCY.

No. 53344.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 8, 1973.

MOTION TO DISMISS ON GROUNDS OF MOOTNESS

On joint motion of Burnell Melvin Yan-cy, the relator in this case, through his undersigned counsel and the City of New Orleans, respondent, through its undersigned counsel and on suggesting to the Court that Burnell Melvin Yancy made application to this Court for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus and Prohibition and that this Court directed the Honorable Thomas L. Giraud, Judge of the Traffic Court of New Orleans, and the City of New Orleans to show cause on the twenty-seventh (27th) day of August, 1973 why the relief prayed for in relator’s petition should not be granted but that since the issuance of this Order the City of New Orleans has amended Affidavit E-77730 in such a manner that the affidavit charges relator with a violation of Traffic Ordinance 828 MCS Code of the City of New Orleans of 1956 as amended Section 38-111.1 (Careless Operation of a Vehicle) and that this amendment renders the issues of law raised in relator’s application moot:

Ordered, adjudged and decreed that this application is hereby dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of SurgiCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger S. Huntington,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/  Roger S. Huntington
#### Frankie LISTER et al. v. TEXACO, INC. et al.

No. 62837.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1978.

In re: Frankie Lister, et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of St. Mary. 361 So.2d 290.

Writ denied. The applicable substantive law is federal admiralty law, and we do not construe the court of appeal opinion as holding otherwise.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1228

To repeal the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 to provide new job opportunities,

effect significant cost savings on Federal construction contracts, promote

small business participation in Federal contracting, reduce unnecessary

paperwork and reporting requirements, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. PRESSLER, Mr. MACK, Mr.

BURNS, Mr. SMITH, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. BENNETT, and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To repeal the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 to provide new job

opportunities, effect significant cost savings on Federal

construction contracts, promote small business participation in Federal contracting, reduce unnecessary paperwork and reporting requirements, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Davis-Bacon Repeal

5 Act’’.
2

•S 1228 IS

1 SEC. 2. DAVIS-BACON ACT OF 1931 REPEALED.

2 The Act of March 3, 1931, entitled ‘‘An Act relating

3 to the rate of wages for laborers and mechanics employed

4 on public buildings of the United States and the District

5 of Columbia by contractors and subcontractors, and for

6 other purposes’’ (40 U.S.C. 276a—276a–5), commonly re7 ferred to as the Davis-Bacon Act, is repealed.

8 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 The provisions of this Act shall take effect thirty days

10 after the date of enactment of this Act but shall not affect

11 any contract in existence on that date or made pursuant

12 to invitations for bids outstanding on that date.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

   The undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 15, 2004
                                                     /s/ Thomas C. Shields
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Thomas C. Shields
                                                     Senior Vice President
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer






This certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be
retained by ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information from unaudited  Statements
of  Financial  Condition  at  September  26, 1997 and  unaudited  Statements  of
Operations for the three-months ended September 26, 1997, which are contained in
the body of the  accompanying  Form 10-Q and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                    SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                                          0
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   31,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                0
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  381,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           0
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                      (23,232)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    381,227
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                0
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                1,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (1,829)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    (795)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (1,034)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (1,034)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 24 – Consents of experts and counsel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of DirectorsElectronic Systems Technology, Inc.Kennewick, Washington

 

We hereby consent to the use of our opinion, dated February 8, 2002 onthe financial statements of ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC., for the years endedDecember 31, 2001 and 2000 in the Form 10-KSB.

 

 

 

MOE O’SHAUGHNESSY & ASSOCIATES, P.S.

 

 

 

Spokane, WashingtonFebruary 20, 2002
#### Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania *v.*Charles E. Leib, Appellant.

Argued June 6, 1975,

before Judges Wilkinson, Jr., Menceé and Rogers, sitting as a panel of three.

*David C. Harrison,*for appellant.

*Daniel R. Schuckers,*Assistant Attorney General, with him *Sydney Reuben,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Robert P. Kane,*Attorney General, for appellee.

*207July 10, 1975:

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The sole question in this case is whether pension benefits paid to the appellant are to be offset against unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 404(d) (iii) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess. P.L. (1937) 2897, *as amended,*43 P.S. §804 (d) (iii) (Supp. 1974-1975). We have twice squarely held that they are. *Etter v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review,*12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 642, 316 A.2d 659 (1974); *Ettelson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review,*12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 617, 316 A.2d 661 (1974). The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania denied the prayer of a petition for allocatur in *Etter*and we adhere to our prior determination.

Order

And Now, this 10th day of July, 1975, it is ordered that the instant appeal be and it is dismissed, and the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review be and it is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000753601
<NAME> OIS OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,078,567
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,100,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,411,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,402,175
<PP&E>                                      21,000,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,402,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       56,942,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        911
<COMMON>                                       974,684
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,364,325)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,402,175
<SALES>                                     22,693,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,693,555
<CGS>                                       43,775,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               82,267,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,778,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,296,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (63,352,407)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (18,459,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (44,893,407)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (44,893,407)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.53)
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

November 5, 2013

Before

RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 12

‐ 1212

ACUTE CARE SPECIALISTS, II, et al,

Plaintiffs

‐ Appellants

,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

‐ Appellee

. Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern District

of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:11

‐ cv

‐ 00465

Matthew F. Kennelly

, Judge

.

O R D E R

On consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc, filed on October 7, 2013,

no judge in active service has requested a vote, and all of the judges on the original

panel have voted to DENY the petition for rehearing.

Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is DENIED

.

It is further ORDERED :

The slip opinion of this court issued on August 22, 2013, is amended as follows:

page 6, line 6, “agreed” should be “agree ”.