alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1006 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1006

To preserve existing rights and responsibilities with respect to waters 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2013

  Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
 Inhofe, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Coats, Mr. Risch, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Grassley, 
 Mr. Wicker, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Heller, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Hatch, 
   Mr. McCain, Mr. Lee, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. 
Chambliss, Mr. Burr, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Scott, Mr. Flake, Mr. Cornyn, and 
  Mr. Coburn) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To preserve existing rights and responsibilities with respect to waters 
                         of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserve the Waters of the United 
States Act''.

SEC. 2. IDENTIFICATION OF WATERS PROTECTED BY THE CLEAN WATER ACT.

    (a) In General.--Neither the Secretary of the Army nor the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall--
            (1) finalize the proposed guidance described in the notice 
        of availability and request for comments entitled ``EPA and 
        Army Corps of Engineers Guidance Regarding Identification of 
        Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act'' (EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0409) 
        (76 Fed. Reg. 24479 (May 2, 2011)); or
            (2) use the guidance described in paragraph (1), or any 
        substantially similar guidance, as the basis for any decision 
        regarding the scope of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
        (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or any rulemaking.
    (b) Rules.--The use of the guidance described in subsection (a)(1), 
or any substantially similar guidance, as the basis for any rule shall 
be grounds for vacation of the rule.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                             PAGEMART WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
                                                        ----------------------------------------------
                                                           NUMBER           PERCENT        EQUIVALENT
                                                          OF SHARES       OUTSTANDING        SHARES
                                                        -------------     -----------      -----------
<S>                                                     <C>               <C>              <C>      
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                     2,300,000          100.00%       2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                  1,057,725           95.47%       1,009,840
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock               15,310,943          100.00%      15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                             11,242,857          100.00%      11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                              4,323,874          100.00%       4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                               6,000,000          100.00%       6,000,000
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                  90,641          100.00%          90,641
   1997 Warrants Exercised                                     48,300          100.00%          48,300
                                                        -------------                      -----------
                                                           40,374,340                       40,326,455

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                         40,326,455

NET LOSS                                                                                   ($8,982,341)


NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                              ($0.22)
                                                                                           ===========
</TABLE>
256 La. 623

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert GASTON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50718.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 9, 1970.

In re: Robert Gaston applying for writ of certiorari.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
December 13, 2007

RECEIVED

Mr. Donald S. Welsh (3RAOO)Regional AdministratorU. S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion III .

1650 Arch Street nliftn iiL’ (iJ1JJ)

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Dear Mr. Welsh:

I am pleased to submit the enclosed revision to the State of Delaware State

Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance of the National Ambient Air

Quality Standards for Ozone, Fine Particulate Matter (“PM 2.5”), and Visibility. The purpose of

the SIP revision is to detail how Delaware meets all of the necessary implementation,maintenance, and enforcement measures required by Clean Air Act (“CAA”) §1 10(a)(2). The

effective date of this revision is December 13, 2007.

In this SIP revision Delaware addresses those requirements of Section 110(a)(2)(A)-(M)

of the CAA which have not been specifically addressed in other SIP revisions. It is acompilation of certain elements that describe how Delaware demonstrates how the eight-hourozone and in some cases the fine particulate (PM25)NAAQS are being implemented, maintained

and enforced. The elements of this SIP revision, once approved by EPA, will provide a federallyenforceable written confirmation of how Delaware will continue to comply with the Section

11 0(a)(2) requirements of the CAA.

The requirements of the CAA Section 1 10(a)(2)(’A) have been met through the normal

public hearing process established by the State of Delaware with proper notification (30 days)prior to the convening of the public hearing. A public hearing was held on December 12, 2007.

Attachments A and B are copies of affidavits as proof of proper notification. It is the position of

the State of Delaware that all minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean Air Act

Amendments have been met.

De€awvie taztze defte’td4 ot
cc: Judy Katz, EPA w/encl.

Dave Arnold, EPA w/encl.Au Mirzakhalili

John A. Hughes

Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14847]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 6, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Midwest Bancorp, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; to acquire 100 
percent of Northern States Financial Corporation and thereby indirectly 
acquire NorStates Bank, both of Waukegan, Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001. Comments can also be 
sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#490a2624242c273d3a6728393925202a283d2026273a092730672f3b2b67263b2e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="24674b4949414a50570a455454484d4745504d4b4a57644a5d0a4256460a4b5643">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. MB Mutual Holding Company and MB Bancorp, Inc., both of Wall 
Township, New Jersey; to merge with Metuchen MHC and Metuchen Bancorp, 
Inc., both of Metuchen, New Jersey and thereby indirectly acquire 
Metuchen Savings Bank, Metuchen.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 6, 2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-14847 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Joseph J. Ueberroth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Joseph J. Ueberroth
|Joseph J. Ueberroth    
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 3, 2005       



The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                          Brooktrout Technology, Inc.
                                  Subsidiaries

                                                          Jurisdiction
         Name                                           Of Incorporation
         ----                                           ----------------

InterSpeed, Inc.                                        Massachusetts

Brooktrout Networks                                     Massachusetts
Group, Inc.

Technically Speaking Incorporated                       Massachusetts

Brooktrout Technology                                   Massachusetts
Europe Limited (U.S.)

Brooktrout Technology                                   United Kingdom
Europe Limited (U.K.)

Brooktrout Holdings, Inc.                               Delaware

NetAccess, Inc.                                         Delaware

Brooktrout Foreign                                      U.S. Virgin Islands
Sales Corp.

Brooktrout Business                                     Massachusetts
Trust

Brooktrout Securities                                   Massachusetts
Corporation

BTGP, Inc.                                              Delaware
#### Leon Thomas LaSALLE, Appellant, v. Flossie Mae BAKER and Timothy Baker, husband and wife, and Timothy Baker, individually, Appellees.

No. 71-775.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 27, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
The Honorable William A. Norris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth

1

Circuit, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-4204

___________

Susan Romeo Joelson, *

Appellant, *

 v. * District Court for the

Seagate Technology, Inc.; Brendan *

C. Hegarty, sued as Brenden * (UNPUBLISHED)

Hegarty, *

Appellees.

*

* Appeal from the United States

* District of Minnesota

*

___________

Submitted: June 13, 1997

 Filed: July 14, 1997 

___________

Before MURPHY, LAY, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1

___________

PER CURIAM.

Susan Romeo was employed as an executive assistant at Seagate

Technology, Inc. After she left her position, she brought this damage

action alleging gender discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation,

defamation, and breach of contract. The 
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of 2

Minnesota.

-2-

district court granted Seagate's motion for summary judgment. After a

2

careful review of the record, we affirm on the basis of the district

court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT 99.1

The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chairman of the Board
of Directors and Principal Executive Officer Merchants and Manufacturers
Bancorporation, Inc. on the basis of such officer's knowledge and belief for the
sole purpose complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Michael J. Murry, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Principal Executive
Officer of Merchants and Manufacturer Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

(1) The Annual Report of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (14 U.S.C. 78m or
78c (d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Merchants and
Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc.

              /s/ Michael J. Murry
              --------------------
              Name: Michael J. Murry
              Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors and Principal Executive
                     Officer
              Date: March 28, 2003
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 724 

Recognizing the historical links and friendship between Scotland and the 

United States and respectfully supporting a truly democratic process. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 

Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee (for himself and Mr. MCINTYRE) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the historical links and friendship between Scotland and the United States and respectfully supporting 

a truly democratic process. 

Whereas the links between the people of the United States 

and the people of Scotland includes three centuries of lineage, cultural, political, military, and economic relations; 

Whereas Scotland has directly influenced the foundation of 

United States democracy, individual freedom, self-representation, and to this day this legacy continues; 

Whereas Founding Father, Thomas Jefferson, embodied 

these Scottish Values and translated them into the 

United States Declaration of Independence, reaffirming 

that millions of people in the United States have Scottish 

roots and identify with their Scottish ancestry, and ScotVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:40 Sep 16, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR724.IH HR724

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 724 IH 

tish people and culture have had a profound effect on the 

United States throughout its history; 

Whereas under the devolution settlement, Scotland has 

achieved a degree of self-governance, but not full self determination; 

Whereas in accordance with an agreement between the Governments of Scotland and the United Kingdom, a referendum will be held in Scotland on September 18, 2014, 

on whether Scotland should be an independent country; 

and 

Whereas, on June 5, 2014, President Barack Obama stated 

that the decision on independence is ‘‘up to the people of 

Scotland’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) believes that the future of Scotland can only 

3 be determined by the People of Scotland on Sep4 tember 18, 2014; 

5 (2) expresses support of the manner in which 

6 the independence debate is being conducted in a 

7 peaceful, inclusive, and democratic way, and com8 mends it as an example to the rest of the world; 

9 (3) expresses deep friendship toward the Scot10 tish people; and 

11 (4) believes that a strong and prosperous Scot12 land is important for United States national prior13 ities. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                                  UROCOR, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED          NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 SEPTEMBER 30,               SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                           --------------------------  --------------------------
                                                               1997          1996          1997          1996
                                                           ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
<S>                                                        <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Net income...............................................  $    521,808  $    634,981  $  2,363,222  $  1,332,911
                                                           ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Divided by;
  Weighted average shares outstanding (1)................    11,069,309    11,189,263    11,907,105     9,261,512
  Plus:
  Supplemental shares (2)................................       --            --            --            129,857
                                                           ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Total weighted average shares outstanding................    11,069,309    11,189,263    11,907,105     9,391,369
                                                           ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Earnings per share.......................................  $        .05  $        .06  $        .21  $        .14
                                                           ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
                                                           ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
(1) Convertible Preferred Stock, Class A Stock and Class B Stock are reflected
    on an "as if converted" basis for periods prior to the Company's initial
    public offering. Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options
    and warrants is reflected using the treasury stock method.
 
(2) Reflects common and common stock equivalent shares issued in the 12 months
    prior to the Company's initial public offering at an exercise price below
    the public offering price of $11.00 per share. After the first three months
    of 1996, such common stock equivalent shares are included in the calculation
    of the "weighted average shares outstanding" above.
# C_2021502EN.01003001.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/30

---

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2021 — Amazon.com and Others v Commission

(Case T-19/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Online sales - Decision to open an investigation - Territorial scope of the investigation - Exclusion of Italy - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 502/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Amazon.com, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States), Amazon Services Europe Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Amazon EU Sàrl (Luxembourg), Amazon Europe Core Sàrl (Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Komninos and G. Tantulli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Ernst, T. Franchoo, G. Meessen and C. Sjödin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 7692 final of 10 November 2020 initiating proceedings under Article 102 TFEU in Case AT.40703 Amazon — Buy Box.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Italian Republic, the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Competition and Market Authority, Italy), the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the Computer & Communications Industry Association. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Italian Republic, the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Competition and Market Authority, Italy), the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the Computer & Communications Industry Association.

| 3. | Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Amazon EU Sàrl and Amazon Europe Core Sàrl shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Amazon EU Sàrl and Amazon Europe Core Sàrl shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The Italian Republic, the Competition and Market Authority, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the Computer & Communications Industry Association shall bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Italian Republic, the Competition and Market Authority, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the Computer & Communications Industry Association shall bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 1.3.2021.

---