alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 139 (Thursday, July 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 34281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15361]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. FD 36205]


Atlantic and Western Railway, Limited Partnership--Acquisition 
and Operation Exemption--CSX Transportation, Inc.

    Atlantic and Western Railway, Limited Partnership (ATW), a Class 
III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 
1150.41 to acquire and operate approximately 0.37 miles of rail line 
owned by CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) between milepost S 198.55 and 
milepost S 198.92, in Sanford, N.C. (the Line).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ ATW states that it is also acquiring certain additional 
excepted tracks that are not subject to the Board's jurisdiction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ATW states that it entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with 
CSXT dated January 2, 2018, to acquire the Line in order to align 
operations and ownership of tracks in this area where ATW and CSXT 
operations converge. ATW also states that the proposed acquisition and 
operation of the Line does not impose or include an interchange 
commitment.
    ATW certifies that the proposed transaction will not result in ATW 
becoming a Class II or Class I rail carrier and that the projected 
annual revenue of ATW will not exceed $5 million.
    The transaction may be consummated on or after August 2, 2018 (30 
days after the verified notice was filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than July 26, 2018 
(at least seven days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No. 
36205, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each 
pleading must be served on Eric M. Hocky, Clark Hill PLC, One Commerce 
Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
    According to ATW, this action is excluded from environmental review 
under 49 CFR 1105.6(c) and from historic reporting requirements under 
49 CFR 1105.8(b).
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
WWW.STB.GOV.

    Decided: July 13, 2018.

    By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2018-15361 Filed 7-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                            0000947219
<NAME>                                    TST/IMPRESO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000
<CURRENCY>                                              USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    NOV-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                               55,579
<SECURITIES>                                         11,088
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8,228,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                        160,000
<INVENTORY>                                      22,182,244
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 30,623,075
<PP&E>                                           17,026,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9,540,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   38,181,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            21,843,883
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                53,038
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                       12,645,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     38,181,847
<SALES>                                          16,508,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16,508,353
<CGS>                                            14,603,992
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14,603,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      2,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    160,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  243,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     176,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                         51,176
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 125,650
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        125,650
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .02


</TABLE>
#### Mrs. Patricia FONTENOT, Individually, and as Tutrix of the minors, Vicki Leigh Fontenot et al. v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA et al.

No. 53270.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 1, 1973.

In re: Mrs. Patricia Fontenot, Individually and as Tutrix of the Minors Vicki Leigh Montenot, Rebecca Lyn Fontenot and Amy Carol Fontenot applying for certi-orari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu, 271 So.2d 323.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 46

Providing for enclosing the galleries of the House of Representatives with

a transparent and substantial material.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. JACOBS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing for enclosing the galleries of the House of

Representatives with a transparent and substantial material.

1 Resolved, That the Architect of the Capitol shall en2 close the galleries of the House of Representatives with

3 a transparent, and substantial material, and shall install

4 equipment so that the proceedings on the floor of the

5 House will be clearly audible in the galleries. There shall

6 be paid out of the contingent fund of the House of Rep7 resentatives such sums as may be reasonably necessary to

8 carry out this resolution.

Æ
CONSENT OF CERTIFIED P UBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors

Electronic Systems Technology, Inc.

Kennewick, Washington

 

We hereby consent to the use of our opinion, dated February 7, 2001 on the financial statements of ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC., for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 in the Form 10-KSB.

 

 

ROBERT MOE & ASSOCIATES, P.S.

 

 

 

Spokane, Washington

February 7, 2001
**Exhibit 31.2****Certifications**I, Thomas J. Koenig, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Day International Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date: May 15, 2006 By: /s/ Thomas J. Koenig         Thomas J. Koenig
San Joaquin Valley 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

December 2,2008 

Mr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager 

Rule Evaluations Section 

California Air Resources Board 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 9581 2 

Dear Mr. Guzzetta: 

Attached is the Rule Action Package for Rule 4306 (Boilers, Steam Generators, And 

Process Heaters - Phase 3), Rule 4307 (Boilers, Steam Generators, And Process 

Heaters - 2.0 MMBtuIhr to 5.0 MMBtuIhr), and Rule 4320 (Advanced Emission 

Reduction Options For Boilers, Steam Generators, And Process Heaters Greater Than 

5.0 MMBtuIhr), which were adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control 

District Governing Board on October 16, 2008. We request that the California Air 

Resources Board (ARB) transmit Rule 4306, Rule 4307, Rule 4320, and the appropriate 

documentation to the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. 

Included with this Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 

1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 

2. ARB APCDIAQNID Rule Evaluation Form 

3. Clean Copy of Rule 4306, Rule 4307, and Rule 4320 

4. StrikeoutIUnderline Copy of Rule 4306 and Rule 4307 

5. Governing Board Resolution 

6. Evidence of Public Hearing 

7. Governing Board Memo 

8. Staff Report with appendices. 

The package is being transrr~itted by e-mail to ARB staff. If you have any questions, 

please contact Manuel Salinas at (559) 230-5833 or manuel.salinas@valleyair.org. The 

District thanks you and your staff for your assistance. 

Sincerely, 

~cott Nester 

Director of Planning 

Attachments Seyed Sadredin 

Executive DirectorIAir Pollution Control Officer 

Northern Region Central Region (Main Office) Southern Region 

4800 Enterprise Way 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 2700 M Street, Suite 275 

Modesto, CA 95356-8718 Fresno, CA 93726-0244 Bakersfield, CA 93301-2373 

Tel: (209) 557-6400 FAX: (209) 557-6475 Tel: (559) 230-6000 FAX: (559) 230-6061 Tel: (661)326-6900 FAX: (661) 326-6985 

www.valleyair.org 

Printed on recycled papera
# C_2022222EN.01004102.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/41

---

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2022 — lastminute foundation v EUIPO — Scai Comunicazione (B Heroes)

(Case T-587/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/68)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 15.11.2021.

---
Exhibit 10.13(a)
​
Schedule identifying agreements substantially identical to
the form of Capital Increase Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.13 hereto
Subscribed Capital of Beijing
Tongmei Xtal Technology Co., Ltd.
​
	​


	​


	​


	​


	​



	​
	    
	Purchase
	    
	​

	Investor
	​
	Price (RMB)
	​
	Capital %

	Liaoning Haitong New Energy Equity Investment (Limited Partnership)
	​
	11,840,774
	​
	1.3373%

	Liaoning Haitong New Energy Low-Carbon Industry Equity Investment Co., Ltd.
	​
	4,604,745
	​
	.5201%

	Haitong Innovation Securities Investment Co., Ltd.
	​
	13,156,415
	​
	1.4859%

	Fujian Province An Xin Industry Investment Fund Partnership (Limited Partnership)
	​
	8,942,416
	​
	1.01%

	Jinggangshan Meicheng Equity Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership)
	​
	5,961,172
	​
	.6733%

	Hefei Walden II IC Industry Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership)
	​
	6,955,797
	​
	.7856%

	Qingdao Xinxingyi Equity Investment Fund Partnership (Limited Partnership)
	​
	3,974,553
	​
	.4489%

	Qiji (Hangzhou) Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.
	​
	3,974,553
	​
	.4489%

	Gongqingcheng Yi Hua Tong Ze Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership)
	​
	1,766,907
	​
	.1996%

	Sunrise Baoying (Ningbo) Investment Center (Limited Partnership)
	​
	1,315,642
	​
	.1486%

	Xiamen He Yong Zhi Cheng Equity Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership)
	​
	860,468
	​
	.0972%

	Hangzhou Jingyue Technology Development Partnership (Limited Partnership)
	​
	993,611
	​
	.1122%



​
_ Confidential Business Information

Combustors BURNER HEIGHT: 4-7 FEET AGS EFF RELEASE HEIGHT: 25 FEET AGS 4.46E+04 kJ/Kg

32",36" and 48" HEAT OF COMBUSTION:

EFF STACK DIAMETER: EFF EXITTEMPERATURE: 400·800 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) EFF EXIT VELOCITY: .1-.9 m/s 1000-1300degrees Fahrenheit (OF) BurnerTemperature Tank Flares

BURNER HEIGHT: 

## - 9-12 FEET AGS EFF RELEASE HEIGHT: 12-17 FEET AGS HEAT OF COMBUSTION: 4.46E+04 kJ/Kg

EFF STACK DIAMETER: .0762 m EFF EXITTEMPERATURE: 400-800degrees Fahrenheit (OF) EFF EXITVELOCITY: 10-400 feet/s I Treater Flares BURNER HEIGHT: 9-12 FEET AGS EFF RELEASE HEIGHT: 12-17 FEET AGS HEAT OF COMBUSTION: 4.46E+04 kJ/Kg .0762 m 400-800 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) EFF STACK DIAMETER: 

### -_.­ - EFF EXITTEMPERATURE:

__·w." EFF EXIT VELOCITY: 125-400feet/s

BURNER HEIGHT: 7-12 FEETAGS EFF RELEASE HEIGHT: 25 FEET AGS 4.46E+04 kJ/Kg 4" 400-800 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) HEAT OF COMBUSTION:

EFF STACK DIAMETER: EFF EXITTEMPERATURE: EFF EXIT VELOCITY: 12-40feet/s Treater Burner



# _--_._-._-------------------­ Confidential Business Information

..**_-------------------~_**

### RE: BakkenFlare data Skiba, RebeccaK. (MRO) to: Eric Wortman 07/24/2012 12:21 PM Hide Details From: "Skiba, Rebecca K. (MRO)" <rkskiba@marathonoil.com> To: EricWortman/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Eric, With the caveat thatthe data you were provided was averaged and not site-specific for any particular Marathon sites, we withdrawour claim ofConfidential Business Information with regard tothis data. Thanks, Rebecca 

### From: Eric Wortman [mailto:Wortman.Eric@epamail.epa.90v] 

### Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 11:55 AM 

### To: Skiba, Rebecca K. (MRO) 

### Subject: Fw: Bakken Flare data
Hello Rebecca, Below is the email I referenced in our phone conversation. As we discussed, Iwould like to reference the enclosed combustorand utility flare specifications in the airquality impact analysis discussions for an AQIA memo-to-file and technical support documentforthe Ft. Berthold FIP, specifically the heightand exit temperature.
Is Marathon able to withdraw the confidentiality claim on this document so that the specifications can be used in the AQIA discussions and a copy ofthe document can be included in the docket forthe rule? Please call me ifyou have any questions, Eric
Eric Wortman Environmental Scientist Air Permitting, Monitoring and Modeling Unit Office of Partnerships 

### & Regulatory Assistance EPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street (8P-AR) Denver, CO 80202-1129 Phone: (303) 312-6649 Fax: (303) 312-6064

, . 0
[No. 434-41770-3.

Division Three.

October 5, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Marvin Lee Lehnherr, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Chelan County, No. 4421, Lawrence Leahy, J., entered October 9, 1970. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
EX-4.93




 Exhibit 4.93 

Letter of Comfort 

No.: 2020 Asian Games Village Credit Granting 1154 

To: Beijing Branch of China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. 

Whereas, Beijing AmazGame Age Internet Technology Co., Ltd. has applied for external guarantee business in your bank and signed the Credit
Agreement with No. [2020 Asian Games Village Credit Granting 1154] (hereinafter referred to as “Credit Agreement”) and the Guarantee Cooperation Agreement with No. [2020 Asian Games Village External Guarantee
Cooperation Agreement No. 016, and 2020 Asian Games Village External Guarantee Cooperation Agreement No.017] (hereinafter referred to as “Cooperation Agreement”) with your bank. The Letter of Comfort is hereby issued by
[Changyou.com Limited ] (hereinafter referred to as “we” or “us”) to guarantee the realization of your bank’s creditor’s rights under the Credit Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement and to confirm to
your bank that we may actively assist your bank in obtaining the disposable funds of affiliates inside and outside the group for repayment. 











 The Letter of Comfort shall take effect and become legally binding upon us after
being signed by our authorized representative and sealed with official seal, which shall remain in force until all debts under the Credit Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement have been paid off. The Letter of Comfort cannot
be unilaterally revoked, withdrawn or changed. We have obtained and performed all necessary internal and external approval, authorization or other relevant procedures required for signing and performance of the Letter of Comfort. We shall not
defend against your bank on grounds including but not limited to failing to pass the internal examination and approval procedure, failing to meet other conditions stipulated in other contracts, failing to comply with the laws, regulations and
regulatory provisions, etc. 
 Authorized signatory: /s/ Changyou.com Limited 

Date: December 9, 2020
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                              HARBINGER CORPORATION

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                            March 31
                                                      --------------------
                                                        2000         1999
                                                      -------      -------
<S>                                                   <C>          <C>
Basic:



    Net income .................................      $ 1,372      $ 2,341
                                                      =======      =======

    Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding
                                                       39,439       39,879
                                                      =======      =======

    Basic earnings per share ...................      $  0.03      $  0.06
                                                      =======      =======

Diluted :



    Net income .................................      $ 1,372      $ 2,341
                                                      =======      =======

    Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding .......................       39,439       39,879

    Effect of potentially dilutive stock options        2,764          567

    Effect of potentially dilutive warrants ....           43            5
                                                      -------      -------

    Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding assuming dilution......       42,246       40,451
                                                      =======      =======

    Diluted earnings per share .................      $  0.03      $  0.06
                                                      =======      =======
</TABLE>




Computational Note:

         In connection with the computation of diluted earnings per share for
the quarters ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 options to purchase 129,000 and
6,000,000 shares of common stock were excluded because the options' exercise
price exceeded the average market price of the common shares, and therefore, the
effect would be antidilutive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         293,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,056
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,881,455
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,430,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 891,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     841,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   891,678
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               732,844
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  703,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,306
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2024 KW 0110

VERSUS

KENDAL DOLLAR MARCH 22, 2024

In Re: Kendal Dollar, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Assumption, No. 

23306. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

PMC

CHH

SMM